The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-18-1996 I I i! p 1 \!/rte ` WOMMIr 06" O"m is may I"I ,r _ ` --around I l"Vatlon Contour SAW* At 10"" *Wk Lot tine 1. 7'14 Owwo" of 60004 apa000I 1o t1 i lota r1tM mail yarM 94W Ia, As a ►aeaitla of this plar wrlw OW4" bom". A Omwitp o1~i prwiM trpttio aM4wJa rWaUvlrJr► ,Mks ~ New S" Water Main "m m4y rolt4W ON Will w rimelo t'rily **Ww tirt Inds~ +roi+tka st " a ALP New Flre Hydrant _ _ _ MIt41 +1 0i a aW by mm to as 1tiaY' hMoro M hNMa* 11TH 00# 41 miar 0TON"" eow am vv*L&wA4m1 to" "s d by RU , onaw D UIR4 r ! ,ll hal.ra N aaoltea, and ° !t -'~1 r- oMtM11Y 1oMMr ortlMrtioa +w~ / r{tlitt400 Sadr a lravr~f ~ r N - New A" Sanitary Sewer rind Manhole .ll. w Y oMw 4".~ 1 W ~ .«N,a 01011 Ilr bli rl M4111 Mrwaa rollrr all tw ao tal~ Ly 1 hhlaa0. ►1 adil L► t .~inr! , rrMw«a"`'»► New storm Drain N Inlet ~wto Liw1), ~.w r irr, rp,a.OV~ Aind 00000 _ Y_ Lot of' l Protected Tree Miia r llet+a vil M~o1# Ia oAirr+n' ~ ok tM r dwi w _ wl".,= :w: boom" iEA1LtY all oNnors 1 t s Briok Column a Fenoe a !t p; wpot ty . W plop l~wl hit t" 4.01 aol ;11* dui" lat0 1r wee. the pottio0 1101 r) 0~ 1001 j8( Private Security tight S I1 G a tiM 1W to arriniltlY'~na~ mr*16 A Ammo ~lrtriat ~to 091"b" rt"44 bO="W, r ~ Plat. L~0 At" 10000 N M. Liao) (~r M to s ~ ~ 111 Mr ~ f1 I~ ~;O-z - 1'30 i~1 L f~L - ~jE- - Drainage Eo.-iment &AL__ Building tine r! 61~ 1i4~rMi► M n$ ~q to M W=t t` eNli rim dr~+M~'' 11044 0041 NWOk of rd ig11wg1 l! A h oiM +p0atyaaMt u>< `JairO !at 1040 la' SYSH Side Yard Setback _ 16 S side 40 lot it t 14 ar1atOAN" o) 101 f lb "60OW 81 SYS13 Side Yard Setback / Driraroy Aa01ar ft "*AW 00 440 priva" 0troot 110 Aaaopi4tio0 rwtww 1,V RYSS --w--- Rear Yard Setback MaOiaaai Mntia as 90641ny Mawr) 1 MOW haraloo0 the laMraai for Wda0opw*t~~e~ "nd ate, Vicinity Map t $0 U14/day i In' FIYSB---_,--• Reor Yard Setback a iadaa~ifOatim oMAI OPOR Iron 0030 =oi! rMftwotianl 1,110 rq.lt. at this oontriqut voftw to 4400 i 1 e' P.U.C. Public Utility Easement i 130 l y a~bb em W anthe t 100001 w r s. r i r~ r r'ri-)'1 1 playoaY and r`ant0, caMNM 21) 1 01 3030 MOM lot, e v apwwa to rn m e of Building Area I. 1. A arc 04Ia080 Will br t4w o" 413030 'fowl Lana. lidevelk dam" to rropraty and Sal ~y 0111 atlk to roaa4eMakwll UND p~r~raW tkxMM 43404 out u! ar4 a! tbo k" that w" oawud by tdr 1, I I 4, It ir'aar "Patad that OAO-p Aoo of 400114 0tility, OUNANlk and ooartrout ar n4ihtoin the P privata Owsm$t l~rawNrt41 1 bgln ddrrttiog M im"Aary 101100 Rity of D1atma rtamle'f#. 5m~~kpa l;~,r, C,Ivck 1. to # W palpl 400404 0030 Q, thlo 100 ig %A WN X- TbM tko a y yD Owirwe , wtNa oas 4 ~ oW r A~141Nign rc wOaMr iwbr trO Mwrba injury to "(no)ulin 1 to the p~ Oy~y rwyrfaoa r.o illrbwh i Ipnw.' idi11i14+1 w+rl.ngr r~MialM www►d'6 o1 ► t~rwlt rWsMe1,M i 4 Dart r1w6,+ llt+ 1 r ~,'',.r►. C1 7130 portiara of tho rlto r 4 4J 4. !1a`prntaM alty, licit 3Yai44*4 We ad all "rooWAift land. rtal~Y d"is qM alraktl l' I ~ I I I `i. 11 10 will hr Ift1wLol tme jar r _ _ 4.lMr a ti i l+~islllot e, Mtko aai0tai~i~t bw tin city alt 1 Ito W40" 1 ~ .j / ! tal 11 M Mh htacN lK 0" 141*1 i Aveett"t w di0tr 4 01 0 MW l., aaMdi is i A, 0~1M 4rlarwri:, '1 p~ t3 rj~c> Gem, C. all « tsl~!}tr0 a. t M Arhaiwo Commaniwtior Jo MrAr+ Newell ta"640"" w as itri""O" oyRlrr i~ .bki~. 1.. Mr W1~03 t 4xpyy ►1yo1 ~tioa at Math o rMr 7M aa~ of 140010Y Laa tMak 1 0115 w ari0tai+rM t" $N*Wty boil no YI OtMr Mko") a h►i 080, rrl~ar. ~ °iOMri', a hooyaad 0001ry 1'M. 11i 1r" 0t tMr rOMirLiM dneranoa ~4 f1I,1 t+l. ~ Mtl►lalhhl atirM 1/ ahrirogn a - baMM~I1~I~a~1 Il~} hlNe~ilrt r~11 wr idrez. I 1101 f i 1 U Communication Cem.t. N 88rr57i52uE a 0 33 9I 1 r, . . .A _ -7T _ I L /r'~ i q ph„ygpth 4vd"s~, , r rft*m"w ma", 00 tw"i at h►llaoln111tUr am 106014 f- II Iip~ llliM M. 001,101 fM Irla's llakl#1a Sit byRw►1r r}proEia r~euvlw..r4a. r.r..►..vrl. I 12' Private Drainage Ft , "4 1 ' I 77, J T? Public Communications Esmt, ✓ /I/ IpG~~' 0 ~ / ✓ ~i ✓ tnlp 'j v N 1001 1",/ f l r r , ✓ ✓ r; JEL f s i~ 1,10 0 `gyp, - II H20-`- x' - 3 i; Ellison Park Circle 1 r/ a a 00 C; I ,.r, \ I r. r~ .at rf" of Wjodted that perky vs;ua aso"opetm are not fat 6*41, tr~w sf Ytreet Ito ( pcivmt*) that w#rv" the 00 41iri a t qty = tm w 1 o or wo i4 r iMc+ of too Rk Ni !i 1bc ~rM h its" ft will par city Was 1 ttl r O U1140140 plus Obey Will pay for / a { N o V r ~ , tD 3 ~12 90, 940 1-1L a~ / 15 _ I J ~ J i(wi L5 iiwiCy Ltlylli f~e147iz testa mi6 ~ .d41 Yn AmAmomwaft&A. qb" W112 VY wr?r_ ~lu~ ~nA lNr~e4 MturM riak oaluwept'snae, prl~erlandscaping and they wyetarr W I I ,M , y ' LO H communlr;a io N / W N 1 % Easement L..... V/ j al % iL LO //24 U-)I 21 OD z /ZZ 10 101,1W / /3 J6, i I co~ 20 SY, MENNEN 50' ~01 Y I op I _~k 2~ / 26 to to O.F. ME[ l I l I//~~ /~Q ray '27 ~ _ / 0 w ~ r , ~r•~ ~ ~ /,1 ,~Sid~wol~~imtr~ ~ I .r +-100' , J 16' Utility EsMf. a crc cnDle " L sto7'm S 8°,391U W 3 51.19' 3 r See Note 7. n U n P.x~ CJ -Stan d '77: ~ D r.,x. ;16' 1• I l J F'~~Ik;in~: L r~ l: L { ~r I_S F _ MOMMENEW . rr y i 1 ■J q( 1 - i i ~ ~ll 1 Ti L ~r a i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET June 18, 1996 i s a t:. r AGENDA Agenda CITY OFJUnNeT4$' CITY COUNCIL bate da 11e m1 closed Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesdayy, June 18, 1995 at 5t45 p.m. in the civil Defense Room of city Hall, 215 E, McKinney, Denton, Texas, at which the following items will be considersdt NOTE1 THF, CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO CLOSED MEETING AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT I5 LEOALLY PERMISSIBLE, 11 Closed Msetingt A. Legal Matters Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.071 1. Joint discussion with Board of Directors of Economic Development corporation of Denton, Ina, to deliberate and consider the appointments to, contemplated litigation, and attorney/client privileged advice to resolve conflict of i,ntereat questions with regard to the Board of Directors of the Economic Development Corporation of Denton, Inc, 2. Consider acceptance of a possible assignment on behalf of a 4S non-profit economic development corporation to be formed by the City from Bill Methenitis, Trustee; the possible %ease of the assigned property and discussion regarding terms of the lease relative to the vacant Texas instruments facility, B. Real Estate Under TEX. GOVT CODE Soc. 551.072 1 1. Consider acceptance of a possible assignment on behalf of a 4B non-profit economic development Corporation to be formed by the city from Bill Methenitis, Trusteel the possible lease of the ` assigned property and discussion regarding terms of l the lease relative to the vacant Texab Instruments facility. 26 Discuss the acquisition of property for expansion for the City's landfill, C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.074 14 Joint discussion with Board of Directors of Economic Development Corporation of Denton, Ina, to deliberate and consider the appointments to, contemplated litigation, and attorney/Client privileged advioo to resolve conflict of interest questions with regard to the Board of Directors of the Economic Development Corporation of Denton, Inc, 2. Consider and deliberate appointments to the position of and duties of the Assistant Municipal Judge, I ~t v r City of Denton City Council Agenda tigendA No. June 18, 1996 Page 2 A001148 Otll. DAIS. ^ Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tueoday, June 18, 1996 at 7100 P.M. in the Council Chambers of city Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 10 Pledge of Allegiance A. U,S, Flag B, Texas Flag "Honor the Texas Flag - I pledge allegiance to thee, ~ Texas, one and indivisible.}' 2, Consider approval of the minutes of May 21 and May 28, 1996, 3, Resolutions of Appreciation A, consider approval of a resolution of appreciation for Mary Jane Pannell. B, Consider approval of a resolution of appreciation for Jann sanders, 4, Citizen Reports As Receive a ottizen report from Marcia Tester regarding "Family Connections" - an emergency runaway shelter for Denton County, B. Receive a citizen report from Kelli Reny regarding "Family Connectionsf, - an emergency runaway shelter for Denton county, C. Receive a citizen report from Nell Lights regarding problems with her property in the City. D. Receive a citizen report from Dessie Goodson regarding various issues concerning the City, E, Receive a citizen roport from Christine McAdams regarding paving liens. 5. Public Hearings A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance to rezone 2.6662 acres from the Single Family 16 (SF-16) zoning district to the Office Conditioned I ()(a)) zoning district, The property is located on the west side of Lillian Miller, approximately 500 feet south of T-35E, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval, 5-1.) B. Hold a public hearing to receive input regarding cable television rates in the City of Denton. I I j r' pity of Denton City Council Agenda June i$, 1996 Page 3 aydnda No,_. ~ ~ Apanda )lero''`'~"~ Data._L.P.:' 6, Consent Agenda Vach of these items is recommended t.y the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent AgenJ.a authorizes the city Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. The City Council has received baokground information and has had an opportunity to raise questions regarding these items prior to consideration, Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back- up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 7.A, 7, 9), This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of the Consent Agenda. A citizen may not speak or fill out a "request to speak" form on an item on the Consent Agenda unless the item is removed from the Consent Agenda. The speaker shall be allowed to speak and the item shall then be considered before approval of the Consent Agenda. A. Bids and Purchase Ordersi 1. Bid #1910 - Bell Avenue sidewalk Repair 2. P,0. #65548 - Decision Technology, Ina. 3. P.O. #65777 - IBM B. Tax Refunds 16 Dentex Title Company - 551.63 2. Dentex Title Company - 540.93 7. Consent Agenda Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. (6.A,1. - Sid #1910) S. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for purchases of materials or equipment which are available from one source in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (6,A.2. ° P.O. #65549, 6.A.3. - P.O. #65777) 8. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Article V entitled "Hotel Occupancy Tax" of the Finance and Taxation Chapter of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas by amending Section 10-101 relating to the definitions of "hotel" and "permanent resident" and adding "Reporting and Payment Period"1 amending Section 10-102 entitled "Levied! Amount= Exemptions't by amending Subsections (a) and (b)) amending Section 10-103 entitled r, City of Denton City Council Agenda a~umida ND .IS.Q: t ~x~~ June 18, 1996 j Page 4 Agontlq Illlrsl _ tltlla~ `use A "Collection" by deleting subsection jb) I amending Section 10-104 entitled "Quarterly Reportsf by replacing with "Reporting and Payment Period"1 amending Section 10»109 entitled "Use of Revenue Derived from Tax" by adding language to ensure compliance with Section 351,103 of the Tax Coded and by adding Section 10-110 entitled "Conflict of Taws"" B. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract between the City of Denton and Binkley & Barfield, Inc, for engineering services to prepare construction plans, specifications, details, and special provisions for Robertson/Bell bypass, C. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Binkley & Barfield, Inc, for an ineering services for the replacement of the existing culvert on Kerley Street, D. Consider adoption of an ordinance adding section 18-13 to Chapter 18 of the Code of ordinances to prohibit the operation of skateboards, roller skates, roller blades or other similar devices on all sidewalks in the area surrounding the City Square. (The Traffic Safety Commission recommends approval,) E, Consider adoption of an ordinance designating and establishing a school safety speed zone for Immaculate Conception Catholic School on both directions of Bolivar Street from its intersection with Second street to its intersection with Third Streets and reducing the maximum prima facie speed limit for said school safety speed zones to twenty miler per hour during certain hours, (The Traffic Safety Commission recommends approval,) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance partially vacating a certain public utility easement recorded in the plat Records of Denton County at Cabinet I, page 118, as it pertains to Lot 2R, Block A of the Bell Place Addition. a, Consider adoption of an ordinance amending section 25-5 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton to eliminate the requirement that persons soliciting charitable contributions on the public streets or roadways shall not walk on the main travelled portion of the roadway for the purpose of soliciting funds, 9. Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution amending Policy No. 144.01 "Solioitation in City Facilities" of the Personnel Policies and Prooodures Manual of the City of Denton to provide for solicitation for United Way and the "Fill-The Boot" campaign by city employees on City time and/or in uniform. 7 s; City of Denton City Council. Agenda June is, 1996 )VAR MU,~.a/4~ l Page 8 rgaudoHftm Oat a r' 10- Consider nominations/appointments to the City?s Boards and Commissions. At Consideration of the nomination of Juanita Johnson to tho Denton Development Policy Committee, B. Nomination to the Keep Denton Beautiful board, t C. Rno@ive a nomination from the City Manager to the Civil Service Commission, D. Consider nominations to varioue City Boards/Commissions, 11, Updato from Municipal Judge Ramsay regarding Municipal Court and a recommendation to consider the appointment of an Aseistant Municipal Judge, 12. Reoeive a report and hold a discussion regarding the proposed 1996-2001 Capital Improvement Program. 13. Vision Update 14, Miscellaneous matters from the City manager. 15, Official Action on Closed Meeting Itemsi A. Legal Matters B, Real Estate C, personnel D. Board Appointments 16. Now Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 17, possible Continuation of Closed Meetings A. Legal Matters Under TEX. GOVIT CODE Sec, 551.071 at Real Estate Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sao. 651,072 i C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 55x.074 t City Of Denton City Counoil Agenda June 18, 1996 r~~enda NO..Z LC LL _ Page 6 Agenda (lent C E R T .I F I C A T E I aerti.fy that the above notioe of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Penton, Texas, on the day of 1996 at O~olook (a.m.) P (pm.`~`_ _ t 1 CITY 84CART- RF1 Y NOTE) THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDAN09 WITH 'THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILTIPIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER$ FOR THE HEARXNG IMPAIRED IF IR QUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED NEETINp, PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (MD) BY CALLING 1-800-REIA<Y-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INIERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH s THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. AC000318 t I L v ~t m tem Apenda . I CITY Oe UBNTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES i4punda Itehie. May 21, 1996 o2 The Council convened into a Closed Meeting oil Tuesday,~My, 21 ~ 0 1996 at 5145 p.m, in the civil Defense Room of City Hall. PRESENT/ Mayor Milled Council Members Beasley, Bites, Cott, Krueger, and Young. ABSENT/ Mayor Pro Tom Brook 1, The Council considered the following in Closed Meetingi A. Logaal Matters Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sea, 551,071 B, Real Estate Under TEX, GOVT CODE Sao, 551.072 1• Considered acceptance of a possible assignment on behalf of a 4S non-profit etronomia development corporation to be formed by the City from Hill Mothenitis, Trustee, relative to the vacant Texas Instruments facility. 0. Personnel/board Appointments Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sao, 551.074 The Council convened into a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, May 21, 1996 at 700 p.m, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, PRESENT/ Mayor Miller] ! Council Members Beasley, Bites, Cott, Krueger, and Young, ABSENTt Mayor Pro Tam Brook 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance to the U, 5, and Texas flags, Mayor Miller presented a proclamation for National Public Works Week. 2, The council considered approval of the minutes of April 2, 9, 10, 16, and 23, 1996, Krueger motioned, Young seconded to approve the minutes as presented. On roll vote, Beasley "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Young 'tayell, Biles aye , and Mayor Miller "aye". Motion carried unanimously, 3. Presentation from Strickland Middle School Class 8-3 (Zan Auntin, teacher) of their Keep Texas Beautiful Awarding Winning Project, ''An Environmental Guide for Kids: Denton 2000-our Home, our Environment.ff Students from Strickland Middle School class 8-3 presented the Council with oopion of their project. . 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes May 21, 1996 aUe~IdA Page 2 No,.d.S. Agepd Item pate c 4. Citizen Reports A. The council received a citizen report from Rick Gibbons reggarding the Community Development Advisory committee's $0 allocation for "Starting over, Ina,". Mr. Gibbons stated that "Starting Over" was a non-profit drug and alcohol outpatient treatment center. The organization was founded in 1992 and in 1993 opened an intensive outpatient program. It had provided services for over 220 clients, The organization was waiting to receive word of a grant award from the Hilton Foundation. He understood that the City and the CDBG funds could not be authorized on a contingency basis. He asked Council to wait until next Tuesday to award the funding for the CDBG funds until he received word about the additional funding he was requesting. Council Member Young stated that he was in support of the program but that there was no where to get the funds for this year. He suggested that Mr, Gibbons begin the paper work for an application for next year's funds. Gibbons stated that he had applied for funds several years ago and was told that the organization did not have enough history, He had put together grants and now had a history of service and was still waiting for funding. He was requesting $34,900 from the City, Mayor Miller stated that the Council had received a report from the Human Services Committee which had looked at his program. There were limited funds and the committee's recommendation was based on that and not on the kind of program. B. The council received a citizen report from Nell Lights regarding the flood plan, debris from tho, concrete company near her home, pollution and ditches. Ms. Lights stated that when she purchased her property in this area she had no idea of the danger of concrete pollution and flood damage. She had not received notification that her property was in a flood plain, There was a misunderstanding between her property and the concrete company. The concrete company was causing problems with her property such as drainage, diteheU and pollution in the area. She needed help with the concrete company. She asked why the concrete company did not have to take polluted water away from the site rather than putting it in a drainage ditch, She had asked before to remove tho flood plain so that she could build on her property. 5. Citizen Requests A. The Council considered a request from J, Mike Riley for an exception to the noise ordinance from Thursday, July 4 - F i~ City of Donton city Council Minutes C. 4...... May 21, 1996 hptlntla No., Page 3 AgWA Item Saturday, July 6 until 12100 midnight at the North Texas State Fairgrounds for the Pro Youth Rodeo Association. Veronica Rolan, Administrative Assistant, stated that Mike Riley was requesting an exception to the noise ordinance for the Pro Youth Rodeo Association at the North Texas Fairgrounds. Krueger motioned, Biles seconded to approve the exception, on roll vote, Beasley "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Young "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Miller "aye", Motion carried unanimously. 6. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance rezoning 21,62 acres to the Single Family-16 (SF- 16) zoning district. The site, known as Estates of Forrestridge Sec. 11, was located at the western terminus of El Pasao Drive. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 6-0,) Frank Robbins, Director for Planning and Develol:mont, stated that this property was annexed in March and the proposal would change the zoning from temporary Agricultural zoning to Single Family-16, The Planning and Zoning Commission determined that all of the policies of the Denton Development Plan had been mat. !the Mayor opened the pubic hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. The Mayor closed the public hearing, Council Member Cott suggested delaying consideration of the proposal for one week as there were three serious oppositio4 s from people who lived in the area. He felt the opposition could be solved if the matter was discussed with the neighbors. Robbins stated that one of the longer eommonts was a letter in which staff had had a conversation with the individual. The concern there was with access to El Paseo. That was not an issue asisoeiatod with this zoning but was rather associated with platting. There was no regulation which could require a reorientation of the road during platting just to give a property owner access to a street, The property which was in opposition still had access to public streets. Council Member Biles felt that some of the responses from the neighbors were confusing, For example, one indicated that he owned the lot on Oa'c Forrest which hacked up to the subject property. The owner did not wants to look into someone else's backyard. That comment was not appropriate as it was not their property, There was no one at .his meeting expressing opposition. i city of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda No„-~ ~ ~--~May 21, 1996 Page 4 AgdAdPtem T The following ordinance was considered: NO. 96117 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING AN ORIGINAL ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION OF SINGLE FAMILY (SF-16) FOR A 21,667 ACRE TRACT LOCATED AT THE WESTERN TERMINUO OF EL PASEO DRIVEL PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF! AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Biles motioned, Krueger seconded to adopt the ordinance, on roll vote, Beasley "aye", Cott "nay", Krueger "aye", Young "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Miller "aye", Motion carried with a 5-1 vote. Be The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance rezoning 1,63 acres to the Two Family (2F) zoning district from the single Family-16 (SF-16) zoning district, The property was located on the east side of Lillian Miller Parkway, approximately 350 feet north of Southridge Drive. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 6-0.) Frank Robbins, Director for Planning and Development, stated that this proposal was initiated by the Planning and zoning commission as a consequence of trat:sferring the property to the GIS system. When the property was originally zoned, there was a road planned in the area known as Ridgeway, The zoning survey followed the proposed location of Ridgeway. Later when Lillian Miller was built change atheo zonings to but the on a was, different This was alignment, a clean up h to zoning location based on the alignment of Lillian Miller. The Mayor opened the public hearing, No one spoke during the public hearing, The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 96-118 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY 16 (SF-16) 'ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 1.63 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE EAST SIDE OF LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY THE NORTH MAXIM rUMSO AMOUNT G OF R $2,E000.00 PROVIDING PENALTY 5 IN FEET FOR FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOFf AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I~ i City of Denton city council Min+ates C7 May 21, 1996 Agenda No,_ Page 5 Agend Beasley motioned, BilaS seconded to adopt the ordinance, on roll vote, Beasley tlayeu, Cott "aye", Krueger ''ayes', Young "ayelt, Bilge "aYe", and Mayor Miller "ayall, Motion carried unanimously. C, The Council hold a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance amending Section 33-47 of the Code of Ordinances to remove retesting requirements for renewal of sign licenses. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommended approval 6-0.) Frank Robbins, Director of Planning and Development, stated that this was a streamlining of the sign ordinance, There was a current provision for a two year license as at the time the ordinance was approved, it was undergoing changes on a regular basis. This tied not. happened for several years and it was felt that the provision for retesting was no longer needed, The license period would bo extended from 2 to 4 years with no retest required at the end of the four years, The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing, The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was consideredt NO, 96-119 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AMENDING SECTION 33- 47 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TO + DELETE RETESTING REQUIRE14ENTS FOR RENEWAL OF SIGN LICENSESt PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, i Bilgs motioned, Young seconded to adopt the ordinance, On roll vote's Beasley "aye", Cott l+ay0l, Krueger "aye", Young 'layer, Biloa aye , and Mayor Miller "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 7. Variances A. The Council considered a variance to section 34-114 (13) (a) of the Code of Ordinances (private street paving standards) for the Tower Addition. The site was located near the east side of Mayhill Road, approximately 1,800 feet north of Treatment Plant Road, (The Planning and zoning commission recommended approval 6- 0.) i Frank Robbins, Director for Planning and Development, stated that City regulations required that this private street needed to be paved, The only development on the site would be a tower and a building to support the electronics of the tower. The development 1 City of Denton City Councii Minutes Agenda No.- May 21, 1996 Page 6 Agenda stein _ would generate only two - three trips per week and it was deemed unreasonable to require the paving of the street, Biles motioned, Young seooncied t; approve the variance, On roll vote, Beasley "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger Playa", Young "aye", Biles 10aye", and Mayor Mil?.er "aye", Motion carried unanimously, 8. Consent Agenda Couhoil Member Young asked that Item 8,A.3., Bid #18930 be pulled for discussion. He asked if the defoliation was harmful. to animals and fish, Denise Hai-pool, Senior Buyer, stated no that only the vegetation which stopped water flow would be affected, Siles motioned, Young seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, on roll vote, Beasl,,y "aye", Cott "aye,', Krueger "aye", Young "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Miller 'lays". Motion carried unanimously, A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1, Bid 01087 - Police Motorcycles 2. Bid #1889 - Ambulances 34 Bid #1893 - Drainage Channel Vegetation Management 4, P.O. #65002 - Integrated Computor Systems 5, P.O. #65209 - Physic Control 96 Consent Agenda Ordinances Counoil considered the Consent Agenda Ordinances 9A-9C. Beasley motioned, Bilas seconded to approve Consent Agenda Ordinances B.A. - 8.0. on roll vote, Beasley llayell, Cott Faye", Krueger "aye+l, Young "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Miller Playa". Motion carried unanimously. A. NO. 96-120 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIOS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOP THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES) PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (7,A.1. - Bid #1887, 7.A.2, W Aid #'1889) B. NO. 96-121 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS] PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (7,A.3. - Bid #1893) 1{ }fl City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda No. May 210 1996 Agendl110m Page 7 C, NO, 96-122 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDINO FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW 2XrMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS] AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, (7.A.4. - P.O. #65002, 74A,5. - P.O. #65209) 10. ordinances A, The council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute a contract between the City of Denton and the Kansas City Southern Railroad company for wire crossing. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that as the railroads were here before the City, the City had to obtain permission to cross railroad. right-of-way. The ordinance would authorize execution of the agreement, The following ordinance was oonsideredc NO. 96-123 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY FOR WIRE CROSSING) AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORI AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Biles motioned, Young to seconded adopt the ordinance, i Herb Prouty, City Attorney, stated that the City would be including wording for an indemnity for an environmental negligence or environmental fines and a clause that irrespective of any negligence on the part of the railway, the City would never, insure another party againot their negligence A provision would be added to indicate that nothing herein would make the City or the licensee liable for actions involving the sole negligence of the railroad. on roll vote, Beasley "ayell, Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Young "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Miller "aye", Motion carried unanimously, B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending Ordinance 96-043 by changing the SR and SR4] rates for residential wastewater service to revise the methodology for dotermining residential wastewater rates} and authorizing credits for residential wastewater customers. (The Public Utilities Board recommended approval.) I City of Denton City Council Minutes Agoildn No, 2 May 21, 1996 Page 8 Agenda 11omT _ Earl crews, Utility Financial Administrator, stated that this proposal had been reviewed by Council at the last work session The change would make the charges more fair for the month of February in terms of the wastewater oharges and would also revise the methodology used in calculating the winter average, Council Member Biles expressed a concern for residents who might experience lifestyle changes, The proposal was to eliminate those cost figures which fell outside of the plus or minus 25$ range, 254 p uslifestyle minukl situ tion, nh it diviggduale would Banda up ralways paying at a higher rate as there would not be another subsequent change. He felt it might be better to move the width of the band to a plus or minus 50* Crews felt it would be appropriate to stay with the plus or minus 25$ and allow the previous winter average to adjust by that amount, Council Member Bil.es stated that if the cost figure would fall outside that plus or minus 25% band, a credit would be given to the 25$ point and in future winters, there would be the opportunity to for another adjustment. Crews replied correct that there would be a 25* adjustment each year if the average stayed the samu in the future. Mayor Miller asked if the ordinance needed to be amended. Crews replied yes that the ordinance would have to be amended to state "using a pus or minus 25$" on the wastewater schedule. The following ordinance was considered: No, 96-124 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 96-043 BY CHANGING THE. SR AND SRW RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE TO REVISE THE METHODOLOGY 10OR DETERMINING RESIDENTIAL WASTEWATER RATES1 AUTHORIZING CREDITS FOR RESIDENTIAL WASTEWATER CUSTOMERS) PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Biles motioned, Cott seconded to approve the ordinance subject to incorporating the plus or minus 25t; language as was discussed for both schedules. On roll vote, Beasley "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Young "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Millar "aye", Motion carried unanimously, C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the professional services agreement with Resource Management City of Denton city council. Minutes AUenONo,- May 21, 1996 Agend_torn__~ Page 9 Onto. International by adding a task order and authorizing additional compensation. Sharon Mays, Director for Electric utilities, stated that the Public Utilities Commission was moving very rapidly to deregulate the utilities industry, This required much paperwork and there was not enough staff available to carry out that paperwork. This amendment to the agreement would assist with the filing of data on stranded investments, This was a critical item in this process and was a very large project, Council Member Biles asked if only city of Denton issues were being addressed. Mays replied correct as it was important for the City to stand alone as there needed to be very 6peoifie investment figures. The following ordinanoe was oonsideredi NO. 96-125 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL ("RMI") BY ADDING A TASK ORDER AND AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL COMPENSATIONI AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Biles motioned, Young seoonded to adopt the ordinance. Council Member Cott asked why the City was not studying the effect on the bond business as well as on stranded costs. Mays replied that they were very aware of the impact the process had on the bond rating. This was very specific as the City was responding to a very specific set of requests and demands from the Public Utilities Commission, On roll vote, Beasley "ayeff, Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Young "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Miller "aye's. Motion carried unanimously, D, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the commercial lease agreement between the City of Denton and Avionics International Supply, Inc. (The Airport Advisory Board recommended approval.) Joseph Portugal, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that this amendment would enable Avionics to secure funding for their building. By assigning the lease to the lending institution they would secure the note and guarantee their funding for the building, ~r~rrr~rr~ City of Denton city council minutes A~onde Na~~~ May 21, 1996 page 10 Apondp Ipm Tr?-~.~ Dplp~2.M! The following ordinance was oonsideredi N0, 96-126 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER Of, THE CITY OF DRNTON, TEXAS TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND AVIONICS INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY, INC,; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Biles motioned, Cott seconded to adopt the ordinance. on roll vote, Beaelley "ayele, Cott "ays"o rtrueger 114ye", Young sayer', Biles uayen, and Mayor Miller i'ayeff, Motion carried unanimously, 11. Resolutions authorizingh theCouncil considered application ° to the resolution Justice Division of the office of the Governor, State of Texas, requesting funding for one Juvenile/domestio violence investigator and associated training and equipment for a Family services unit, Mike Jaz, Chief of Police, stated that this resolution would authorize the .ubmission of an application for a grant for a Juvenile/domestic violence investigator and associated training and equipment for a Family Services Unit, This was a five year similar to other grants which the City had applied for through r Criminal Justice Division, the The following resolution was considereds NO, R96-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, STATE OF TEXAS, REQUESTING FUNDING FOR ONE (1) JUVENILE/DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INVESTIGATOR AND ASSOCIATED TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT FOR A FAMILY SERVICES UNIT) AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Young motioned, Biles seconded to approve the resolut.on on roll vote, Beasley "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Younn ,;ayes, Biles aye , and Mayor Miller aye , Motion carried M,-o,imously, B. The Council considered appr. authorizing the City Manager to sign ar,,i submit to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1996 Action Plan for Housing and Community Development wil!, appropriate certifications, as authorized and required by the Housing, ?rid Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, nd the National. Affordable Housing Act of 19901 as amended, (Tho Community Development Advisory Committee recommended approval. City of Denton city council minutes Awda Nu. )O May 21, 1996 Page 11 Agenda tern 0110.._ ! 15..-.~~ - Barbara Rose, Community Development Administrator, stated that this resolution would approve the 1996 Action Plan for housing and community development, There were revisions included in the agenda packet which stemmed primarily from the additional money received from the Federal government., These additional funds were included in the Plan as unprogrammed funding. The only other revision was the deletion of the road hump project as requested. The Plan did not include the activity stage as the project would be considered by the Committee and a recommendation returned to Council regarding the additional funds that could be used to fund the activity stage, The Action plan included those recommendations that had already taken place without any recommendations that might be considered for the additional funding. City Manager Benavides stated that the council had indicated that they wanted the money to be used for the activity stage. Rose stated that because of, Federal requirements, recommendations would be taken to the committee and it was required that those recommendations be put out for public comment for a 30 day period, That %4ould have to take place before those additional funds were allocated for projects. Council Member Giles stated that there was a 30 day period required by Federal law for public comment before the council could move on the funds or before the Committee could move. Ross replied before the additional funds which the City received notification of could be allocated to specific projects, Council Member Biles asked if the $7,500 which was allocated for the road humps could be specifically designated for the activity stage. Ross stated that the $7,500 by itself was not sufficient funding for the activity stage. The Parks Department was working on options for the stage for porhaps something less than what was initially planned or looking at a stage which was originally planned. City Manager Benavides stated that yes the $7,500 could be allocated for the stage oven if it was not adequate, Ross replied that it could be but because of the volume of the additional funding the City was receiving, it was suggested at the last meeting that. those funding amounts be returned to the Committee and discuss with them the potential uses of those funds including the $7,500 which Council requested be deleted from the Action Plan. City of Denton city council minutes Aomida No... May Page 212 1996 Pa Council Member Giles stated that he understood that the $7,500 which had been rooommended for the road humps would be specifically designated to be used for the activity stage. He understood that the stage would have to go back through a process for consideration as to what recommendations to make such as how much it was going to cost how big would be the back, eto. His intent at the last meeting was to make sure that the $71600 for the road humps was deleted from a street category and specifically put into a stage category. Ross stated that that was not included but the Council could amend the Action Plan to include that as just stated, she had misunderstood the Council from the prior week and had included that money as unprogrammed funds to be programmed as the committee worked on the allocations for the additional funding. Council Member Hiles stated that the committee would have to put this out for public comment for a 50 day period at which point in time the Committee would have to provide another, recommendation and then return to Council for consideration. Ross stated that there were additional funds besides those which would go towards the activity stage, The standard procedure when additional funds were received or if not all funds were allocated, was to have the Committee provide an additional allocation recommendation. council Member Hiles wanted the stage in bred Moore Park to be specifically considered by tho Committee with a specific recommendation back to Council. If the recommendation was to build a $45,000 stage as was an original projection, $7,500 would already be earmarked for the stage coming from this meeting. Ross replied that that was something the Council could do at this time, Council Member Heasley asked if all of the projects which were not funded in the first consideration would be considered again or would applications have to be resubmitted, Ross stated that based on Council's recommendations at the last Council meeting, staff was going to go to the Community Development Advisory Committee and the Human Services Committee with specific proposals and ask them to consider those proposals, The activity stage would be included in those proposals, Council Member Heasley asked if all of the projects not receiving funding would be considered for this additional funding, Ross stated that they would be considered by the Committee. F. city of Denton city council minutes Agenda NO, May 210 1996 Agenda/ elem. Page 13 Dale city Manager Benavides stated that his understanding was that counoil wanted $7,BOO from the road humps for the stage. The remainder of the balance to get to the $450000 would dome from the $76,000. The Committee would have discretion for the $30,000 which was unprogrammed and +.indirected by the Council to consider projects which were not originally allocated or to consider new projeots. The first $45,000 was earmarked, if rational and practical, for the aotivity stage. There would not be much discretion on the Committee's part for this amount of money. Council Member Biles stated that he was ready to make a motion that $45,000 of the $76,000 would be used for an activity stage subject to working out the details on the stags. That would leave $31,000 for other projects recommended by the Committee. He understood from this meeting that federal law required a 30 day public comment period, had to go to Committee, eto. Could the council decide at this meeting to fund an activity stage. Ross stated that the council mould set aside at this meeting $7,500 from road humps for the stage and Council could direct ste.ff to set up the additional funds needed to build a stage and work with the Committee to achieve that. Because of the substantial naturs of the additional funds, a 30 day publio comment period was needed before returning to Council for action. Council Member Biles asked who required the 30 day time period. Ross repliod that the City of Denton Citizen Participation Plan and the Consolidated Plan regulatione. required at least a 30 day public comment period prior to allocating funding. City Manager Benavides stated that it was a legal hurdle required. But council could designate what it wan-Led to use the $45,000 for. Council Member Beasley stated that she was in agreement of building the stage but did not have a problem letting this go back to the committee. Young motioned, Cott seconded to allocate $45,000 for a stage at this meeting. Mayor Miller indicated that this could not be done at this meeting but that Council had indicated its direction to staff. Council Member Young understood that the dollars could be designated for the stage at this meeting and then go through the 30 day process. Ross stated that council could direct staff to not aside those funds and set that up as part of the citizen participation process. i City of Denton city council Minutes Agenda No- 4 May 21, 1996 Agand 1! Page 14 Maor subject Miller to settingdasthat ide upetoo$45,000afor ther activity resolution Floss stated that the $45,000 would include the $7,600 as funding for the activity stage, Hrueger council Member e he Council wanted to asked maif the 30 day ke an amendment to comment Committee's recommendation, Roes replied no that the 30 day period for public oomment was not due to any changes which Council might make to the Committee's additional recommendation, whioh had not yet been subject to the citizen participation process. Cis,, Manager Benavides stated that the Council could reallocate any of the comment per iod lwas money requiredtfor dthenow $76,0 00 which no one had seen yet. Council Member Biles stated that the motion included that would previously allocated $7500 was out of the $1 million, l be used for a stage out of the original allocation and Council $4S 000, the funding to come out of could give direction it toion for tme balance the Lidia De Is Garza, speaking through an interpreter, stated that she was in support with their hiring n bilingual to assist bilingual individuals Martha Garcia stated that she was a member of the MLK Advisory Committee and she was in support of hiring a bilingual individual atfthe assist Rosemary Rodriguez a who was also in center. of the proposal statement MLK Center. Richard Godoy stated that he was a social worker at Denton High School and supported the hiring of a bilingual social worker at the MLK Center. The needs of Hispanic residents in that part of the City were great and they needed someone in a professional position who could communicate in their own language. The area families had the City he area who se vsocial ices inworker coulds help a linneed k themrwithbilingual Franoisa Ryan stated that she was in support of hiring a bilingual staff worker at the MLK Center who understood the Hispanio culture, The MLK Center could be used for. ESL classes. Martha Guerra stated that she was in individual staff person who was aware of the Hispanic culture. The f r, City of Denton city Council Minutes :ponds No, . May 211 1996 Aponda Slam page 15 rr~~ MiN-w. J Hispanic population needed information on the way the city functioned and there was a need for better communication between the city and Hispanics, Sherri MoDade stated that f+he was in opposition to some of the funding requests. There were requests for funding which were not approved such as an extension of the TWU Cares Program, a request for furniture and equipment for the American Legion Hall, and needs of the Girl scouts, she suggested not funding the maid service at Fairhaven as it only affected a select few and there were many more people who could be helped better with those funds. Council Member Beasley stated that at the last work session, she had asked staff to look at funding that position through a staff position in the City budget. The recommendation from the Committee felt that this funding should be done through a regular staff position of the City and not through the COBG funds. There were a lot of needs in the community and there was only a limited amount of funds. The money for Fairhaven was for very elderly individuals who needed help in every day living. City Manager Benavides stated that the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Chief of Police would be looking at the issue for separate analysis on how to beat respond to this request. The recommendation would be presented to council during the budget process for consideration. The following resolution was consideredi NO. R95-025 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT A 1996 ACTION PLAN FOR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WITH APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATIONS, AS AUTHORIZED AND REQUIRED BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1990, AS AMENDEDI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. On roll vote on the motion to approve the resolution with the deletion of $7,500 from the speed bump project and add to that ;x'1,500 an amount up to $45,000 for an activity stage at Fred Moore Park, On roll 'Iota, Beasley "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Young "aye", Biles llayGll, and Mayor Miller "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 12. The Council considered nominations/ appointments to the Keep Denton Beautiful Board, the Development Policy Committee, the Vision Project Cabinet and the Data Processing Board. There was no appointment to the Denton Development Policy, z City of Denton City Council Minutes AoondaNo..f.i ~~c2:~j May 21, 1996 Page 16 Aoeride Ihni ~L 0.118 . { 2,1- Council Member. Young nominated Lupo Tovar to the Data Processing Advisory Board, Gayla Robles was nominated by Mayor Pro Tem Brook at a previous meeting for the Keep Denton Beautiful Board. On roll vote, Beasley 'layoff, Cott "aye", Krueger 'layoff, Young 'laye'l, Hiles 'layelt, and Mayor Miller "aye", Motion carried unanimously, Mayor Miller indicated that there was a vacancy on the Vision Cabinet as he had moved to the chair position upon election as Mayor. Council had another appointment available for the Cabinet, Council Member Beasley indicated that she would be interested in the position, council Member Krueger nominated Council Member Beasley, On roll ! vote, Beasley 'laye'l, Cott I'aye'l, Krueger 'layeu, Young "ayoff, Biles "aye", and Mayor Miller '+ayeff, Motion carried unanimously, 13, Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager, City Manager Honavides did not have any items for Council, 14. There was no official action taken on items discussed in the earlier Closed Meeting, 15, New Business The following items of New Business were suggested by Council Members for future agondest A. Council Member Young requested a re-evaluation of the day laborer situation. B, Council Member, Krueger asked for a review of the current solicitation policy for charitable solicitations specifically the fire fighters "Fill the soot" campaign. He was in favor of amending the current policy to allow the fire fighters to solicit for this charity while on duty and in uniform. City Attorney Prouty stated that a recent Attorney General's opinion was not in favor of what the fire fighters wanted to do, C. Council Member Hiles stated that he would like to review the policy to allow on-duty in uniform charitable solicitations. D. Mayor Miller stated that the Council had received an invitation for a work shop and luncheon of NCTCOG for June 7th. 16, The Council did not meet again in Closed Meeting, Oity of Denton City Counoil Minutes May 21, 1996 Apvntla No.. Page 17 Apvntla Ilom~-~- Daty. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 800 p.m, MK MILLER, MAYbR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WA17TERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS A000030N i i a Agonda Nu.._% ').L;✓. Agond 110m',f_,c;~...,,~ CITY OF DhNTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 28, 1996 The Council convened into a Work Session on TueaHay, May 28, 1996 at 7x00 p.m. in the City Council chambers. PRESENTi Mayor Miller] Mayor Pro Tom Brockj Council Members Beasley, Riles, Cott, Krueger, and Young, ABSENTt None 11 The Council received a report, hold a discussion and gave staff direction regarding an interlocal agreement for the widening of McKinney street, Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation, stated that the developer of tho County Court Complex indicated a need for a widening of McKinney street as the Complex would have a large impact on the traffic in the area, The County was agreeing to participate in the project from Audra/Woodrow and provide $300,000 for the project. Staff was needing direction from Council to approach the Texas Department of Highways and aok that a portion of McKinney be removed from their maintenance system and placed in the City's system. Currently the city's maintenance ended at Janie Street and the Department of Highways had maintenance from Janie to the Lake. Janie was a residential street and was not a logical termination point for maintenance. Woodrow was an artzirial street and was a more logical termination point for maintenance. A typical Highway project took three years to go through the system and as a local projeat would take approximately 6 months to get it off the highway system. The local Area Engineer was in agreement with the proposal and would support thu City in its efforts, Staff had had a meeting with the County and all agreed that this was the best solution. Staff was requesting direction from the Council as to whether to ask that the project be removed from the Highway'a maintenance system, If within 6 months the City received approval from the Highway Department, the project could be completed in 1997. Council would be asked to consider a formal agreement before any construction was started. Council Member Young asked how long the project would be once started, Clark stated that that would depend on the method used for construction, This was a State road so it would have to remain open during construction. In tha'. case it Would take several months to complete the project. Another option was a high speed rebuilding project as was done on Teasley between 135 and Dallas Drive. That was done in approximately 20 calendar days, Council Member Young stated that no businesses would be afferted. Clark stated that. it was all residential, Council. Member Beasley asked for the total cost of the project. Clark indicated that the total cost of the project was $390,000 of which } s r Agenda City of Denton City Council Minutes Agenda /1llom, May 26, 1996 Dalo Page 2 the County had a reed to contribute $300,000. There was $90,000 in reserve from previous bond iseiues for such a project, Council Member Beasley stated that the time line with the State was three years. Clark replied correct and that there was no guarantee that it would be funded at all. Council Member Beasley asked about maintenance costs. Clark indicated that the project would be an 81' asphalt road with not much maintenance the first to years. Krueger motioned, Young seconded to proceed with staff recommendations, council Member Cott felt that a drop dead date was needed if the State did not return with an answer in a timely fashion, Clark stated that a year could used as the County wanted the road built within a year. On roll vote, Beasley "aye'', Brook "aye", Cott "aye", KLU«ger "aye", Young "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Miller "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 2. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding a time line for Boards/Commissions appointments, Jennifer Walters, City Secretary, reviewed the schedule presented in the Council back-up materials. She indicated that the date for the Briefing Session would need to be changed due to a conflict with another evening meeting which the Council was going to attend, A proposed date for the Briefing session would be June 12th instead of June 13th, She reviewed the time line and the events which would take place on oath date, council held a discussion on the nomination/appointment process. it was felt that the process was somewhat unfair as not all Council Monbers had nominations/ appointments to each board/commission, suggestions wore made to rotate the Council Member's positions on the boards/commission or to increase the number of members on each board to at least; seven or fourteen to allow each council Member to have a nomination/appointment to each board/ commission. It was noted at there were some Charter provisions which dictated the number of members on certain boards such as the Library Board. It was felt that a work session needed on this issue with further consideration by the Council. 4 Aponda lem ~..~j~•~-~ City of Denton City Council Minutes May 28, 1996 Page 3 Mayor Millar asked if there were any problems with the time line as presonted with the change for the Briefing Session. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with the time line as amended. Fallowing the completion of the Work Session the Council convened into a Special Call Meeting. PRESENT: Mayor blill rlegor p and m r okl Council Members Beasley, silos, Cottf Kru ABSENTI None 1. The Council considered the following in Closed Meeting: A. T.agal Matters Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sec. 551.071 1, Considered acceptance of a possible assignment on behalf of a 4B non-profit economic development corporation to be formed possible Please of the roams ign©dMproperty andrdisoussion Texas regardi terms of the n trum nts facility lease relative va ant Attorney tot the City 24 Considered and discussed claim of Bertha Odnoposoff LongridgegDrivePublic company for. propertytdamageCity atf1012Denton p i B. Real Estate Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sao. 551.072 C, Personnel/Board Appointments - Under TEX. GOVT CODE Sao. 551.074 1. Deliberated and considered the appointments to the Board of Directors of the Economio Development Corporation of Denton, Inc, 2. The Council did not take any action from the Closed Meeting, I With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:2 p.m. i MILLER JENNIFER WAL'TERB----- JACK MAYOR CITY CITY OF SEOR DZNTONMAf~Y, TEXAS CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACCO0312 't Agenda No, _ Lillr,___,_ Agenda Ilem,-A Date " NIARV BANE PANNEL,L" WHEREAS, oil May 31, 1996, Mary Jane Pannell retired, after serving with [lie City of Denton since October 1, 1973; and WHEREAS, during lite post 20 years, Mary Janc has represented our City as an examplo or a quality servlcc employee; avid WHEREAS, the City of Dotlon has boot fortunate in having cnjoye.l the dedicated and outstanding service of Mary Jane 1101111011 and wishes to recognizo some; and 1VRE.REAS, Mary Jane has always served above and boyonJ the efficient discharge of her dukes In promoting the welfare and prosperity of the City, and bas carried the Altl respect of her fellow employees, colleagues and citizens of Denton; NOW0 'I'llEREPORE, T11C4 COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF DENTON IIPRVlJY RKSOLVFS1 That the sincere and warm oppreclatfom of Mary Jane felt by the citizens and officers of the City of Demon, be formally conveyed to her In a permanent manner by recording this Resolution upon the )mcia[ minutes of ilia City Council of the City of Donlon, Texas, and for- warding to her a tole copy dtcreof as a lokcn of our appreciation. PASSED AND A11PROVFD this day of , 1996, JACK MILLER, MAYOR ^ AlVST: JI NNIPLIt WAL11316, CITY S14CRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEOAL PORb1: IMMIJ1 R'f L. PROUT'Y, CITY ATTORNEY 11 Y: l it 1 Agenda No,_ CAS" Agenda a M_ We, "JANN SANDPRS" 1VJIPREAS, on fviny 31, 1996, Jann Sandct. relfred, aflur serving with II, City of Denton slice August 7, 1983; and quality 1VserviceDEReRmASpl, duringn oyee;tirodpast 12 years, Jann has represented our Clty as an example of n a WHEREAS, Iho City of Denton has been fortunate in having enjoyed the dedicated and outstanding service of Jann Snnders and wishes to recognize same; and WIIFJREAS, Jann tins always served above and beyond the ofnciom discharge of her dulles In promoting the welfare and prosperity of 1}re C11y, and has earned the !till respect of Der fallow employees, collengues and clllzens of Denton; NOW, THEREFORE, TIM COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON IIF,RkUY RESOLVEM 'f'lint (ito shicere and warm appreciation of Jann Sanders fell by the clilzeas and officers of the City of Denton, be formally conveyed to her 1n a permanent manner by recording this Resolullon upon the official mtnutes of the Chy Councll of the Cily of Donlon, 'T'exas, and for- warding to her n true copy thereof as a token of our appreciation, PASSED AND APPROVED this day af,_ 1996, JACK MlLLLrR, MA)1011 A'T TPST: 1CNNIFfIR WAITERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO IXOAL FORM: 11PI 1ERT I, 11RC r1TY, CI'T'Y ATTORNEY BY: u a Awde k..-a~- Agenda lto D,'Ite-_ DATE; June 18, 1996 CITY COUNCIL DEPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Counoil FROM, 'fad Benavides, City Manager SUBJECT: Hold a publto hearing and consider an ordlnanoe rezoning 2,6662 acres from the Single Family 16 (SF-16) zoning dlstrlot to the Office Conditioned (0(o)) zoning dlstrlot, The subject property Is located on the west side of Lillian Miller, approximately 600 feet south of 1.35E, , $FrOMMENDATtCI ~I: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the request, five In favor, one opposed (6.1). S" ARY, See Planning and Zoning Commission Report, BACKNIMP; See Planning and Zoning Commission Report. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS At:F CTED: Not applioabte, None. Respeotfully submitted: „pp _ Ted Ben as City Manager Apanda Na_L(SZ_•~~_ Agonda Item Prepared by r VA - Walter t~, Reeve ,"Jr Urban Planner Approved, Frank Q bins, AICP Director Planning and Development Attaohment #i Planning and Zoning Commission Report, Attaohmen1112: Crdlnanoe Attaohment 113; Minutes of the April 24, 1996, P & z meeting. j I I i t a2°rncHN•Ns'r Agenda Nn. ~ HAW PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT To: Denton City Council From: Planning and Zoning Commission Date: June 16, 1996 Subjeot: Z-96007 GENE AL INFORMATION Applicant: Mr. Rob Rayner 1108 Dallas Drive, Suite 310 Denton, Texas 76201 Owner: First State Bank of Denton PO Box 100 Denton, Texas 76202 (Mr. Phil Gallivan) Action: Rezone 2.6662 acres from the Single Family 16 (SF-16) zoning district to an Office Condition (0(oj) zoning dlstriot, Location: The subject property Is located on the west side of 1-II11an Miller, approximately 600 feet south of 1.36E, (See Attachment i) Surrounding Zoning and Land Use. North: Red Lobster and shopping center In the Commerolal (C) zoning dlstriot South: PD-87 (a vacant single family resldentlal PD). East: Shopping center In the General Retail (GR) zoning district, West: Single family resldentlal In the SF-16 zoning district, Denton Development Plan: Low Intensity Area #79 (71% allocated), S#a CAL I_( FO TION The subjoct property is Lots 6, 7, & 8 of the J.W. Erwin Subdivision. It Is unknown whether the property will be developed as three separate lots, or whether It will be replatted and developed as one lot. As existing platted lots, there are no public improvements required from the City's Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, If the property Is replatted, there would be a number of mayor concerns. These same Issues could also be considered as part of the rezoning request, but would require being made part of the ordinance In order to be bindlnct. A left turn lane would be required In t.Illlan Miller, there would be no additional driveway outs into Lllllan Miller, drainage would need to be collected on•slie, and run directly Into the existing storm sewer In Lllllan Miller, A short storm sewer extunslon would be required. Additional fire hydrants would need to be provided, Sidewalks would be Page 1 4 r i Agenda No._LCl Agenda Ilona required along the Lillian Miller frontage, and the 8 Inch water line directly north of the properly might require extension depending on the slope, BACKGROUND There Is quite a bit of history asscolaled wllh this properly, 1881 Case Z•1497, a request to rezone the property from SF-16 to Offlce, Is denied by the Planning and Zoning Commisslon October 1983 Case Z-1616, a request to rezone the property from SF-16 to General Retail Is withdrawn by the applloant (at that time) prior to the Planning and Zoning Commisslon public hearing December 1983 Case Z-1625, a request to rezone the property from SF-16 to a Planned Development for Offlce Use was withdrawn by the applicant (at that time) prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing. December 1985 Case Z-1772, a request to rezone the property from SF-16 to a Planned Development for Office Uso was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and denied by the City Council. February 27, 1991 The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denlal of a request to rezone the area from SF-16 to a Planned Development hr a 5,148 square foot restaurant (Owens) and 12,121 square foot office. The recommendation was not appealed to the City Council. Prior to September 1989, this tract was located in a moderate actlvlty center. In August 1988, the Appendix A Task Force (Denton Development Plan) was appointed by the Clty Council and was given the duty of recommending the boundaries of intensity areas In order to Implement the polloles of the Denton Development Plan. In drawing the llne for this particular lntenslly area, the Task Force considered the existing land in that area The Task Force came to a consensus that moderate nodes should contain no more than 20 acres of Commerotal/retall type uses (1/3 Mule). This particular area oontalned 23.16 acres of existing retall/commerclal activities; therefore, It was agreed that this was enough nonresidential usage for that area In vlew of the traffic build up on Lillian Mlller. The Task Force Identified a boundary line for the moderate actlvlty center which inoluded only the 23,16 acres of land currently zoned commercial and general retail, This particular tract was excluded from the moderate aolivlty center because of Its residential zoning and vacant land use status Page 2 4~ , Apenda Agenda Ilom.`- 1_~~,e Date D~5 NOTICE Nineteen notioes were malled on April 12, 1996, Seven repllos were received, two In favor and five opposed. The opposed responses represent 21,28% of the land area within the 200 foot notloe, and as a result, the "20% Rule" will be In affeot, requiring six (6) Counoll votes to approve, ALYSIS The table below will provide a summary of the Plan related analysis for this pro)eot, Denton Development Plan Polloy Analysts Summary Low Intensity Area Z-98.007 Davelopment Hating V$ Policy POLICY COMMENTS shiMeanrry 9anewaal connuMl elCOeaINMI InconalflMl I rdooAvolopniont be conslstonl Mill the Plan, a Allocated Intensity - 100 fnlonslly trips, should not exceed hs Proposed Intensity - 376lntonsly tripe, ACA MACAW Intensity. The proposed Inlonsity Is 1134% more than allowed by the Donlon Development Pion. strict allo plan conhol wllhln 1,000 No silo plan proposed. This Is Cgnllicantly fool of existing tow density noonslstent with post staff m ommondallons x restdonhal, on provlous cases, and Also foconeietont With Iho p1m Trofllo design to ensure that Will. LI@nn Milton Is classl0od no a primary orlorlat. Family or Non•Hostdonhat uses have access to colloctors or larger x arterlAls with no direct owes$ through rosldonllal shoots. sufflolenl groan space, rocreneonal Landsoaptng will bo raqubod es per the Citya foallltios And dlvorshy of parks Oro Lsndscaping, Screoritng, and Troy provided, Prosorvatlen Ordloance. The eoplicsnt Is proposing a Class '0' buBerya,d without a fence. No locelton Is proposed, Our neslgn x Ouldellnos (whloh ere unadopled), would requlro a Class 10' bufforyard, whh fence, on the south and wall property lines, No bufferyaid would bo roqulred Wong Iho northorn property Iles. Input Inlo-planning by nolghborhood A nalghborhood meeting was hold on April 3, assoclahons and counolls Is 1890, 1016 area rosldanla attended, The x oncoumged. response was not posltiva. Nolghborhood sorvlce center The subject property has dfreot access to concentration Ulm Mlhm, Which Is classilled as A primary aderlAL Maximum plan slxO 11 3 acres along x A prlmary artortal. Subject property to 2.0002 oores, Nonrosldonllal Y2 mllo separAtlon The subject properly Is dirootly adjaoont to A shopping cooler to the north, and Is wehln 200 x fool of A shopping cooler to Iho east across LIIIIan Miller, Page 3 ~5 C' Agenda N0._/ `e Agenda il9m,`- Any loan of conllnuous strip IFRO90,1morcJ1noAI of this property would extend oommorcial development Is stronOsldanllel zoning further south along X discouraged In or near low Intensn Miller, and would be 0onelderod strip areas dovalopmem, Lillian Miller Sproule Area PoloaO, QIVen the p(ominonco of the scull, 8asl Planning Afta and 1he thoroughfare network In li sector there are likoly to be prossures 10 fccae high to moderate fntenslty land usas , FM 1181, Lillian Miller parkway, Hobson Isms, 6358, and between Loop 288 And Lluian Miller, along Teasley Lane These pressures are fikoly to. FM2 a 1, FM 2184 is developed as 0 primary arterial And extended further south to ulorantaty connect wish the DFW Airport, The policy of this Plan therefore is io roslrtot the further Intmsfen of high and modoraio intonaity land uses in this area. Limlted nolghborhood services and high density housing conslslont will, the slondarda for a tow Intensity area, are not pfohlbitod. The l090wtng ei iHO guldo9nes Oro required, The neighborhood dcnallyAntonolty The proposal exceeds the plan maximum standards should be ctosoly intanohy by 134% monitored and vigorously X implomanted. ROStrlcl curb 01,19 to Teasley Lane, If 1epl011ed, access will be limiled to the FM 2181, Lillian Miller, and Hobson exisling driveway, Lane. X Restdenital subdivislons should be NA 9an0raliy designed so houses do not 1000 onto maJof thoroughfaros. Th4so should accosr, onto local and collector otreols. p Through traffic to DPW, NA _ _ X In oonsfdufno the dlaproporttonato share alloostlon of Intvnslty, the Planning and Toning Commission and City Council should consider the lollowing items, but are not Ilmltad to these Ilemal Adequato tnfrAotti There will be a number of public improvements required II the pror•orly Is roplalted. Theao same ImproVemonts can, and should, be oonsfdomd as part of the rezoning requesl, but would need to be part of Any ordinanoo rezoning the properly to order fo be binding. The major Issue A number of the previous Doses was tiefflO Impacts on Ulan Millier. in the most recent case (1981), the peNlioner propu0ed dedicating A place of property and conslruoling a fight hurt Jana at the oornor of Llluan Miller and I. 358, The applicant also proposed to constru0t a loft turn lane for the nOrthbound Jones of Llluan Mllior Info the property. The Applicant In this ones has not conducted a Trafho Impact Anatysls for the proposal. Other poblfo lmpfovements would be required 1f the property Is repiAtfed, or modO ii of the ordinance rezoning the proporty, Hydrant spacing Is 6001001 in re9idOntiAl arena, And 300 foot in commerclalAndualilAt areas, Flre hydrant spacing Is a requfremanl of the Clty'O Subdivlslon and Land Devolopmont Ragulatlone, bul would onty come Into play II the w property is roplatiod or If such A roqulremont is made a port of any ordinance rezoning the property. Unusual Topography The subject piopody Is gently sloping, At one polnl It was homily woodod but woe clear-cut' In the cantor, There are no unusual lopogrophlo foAlwos that would warfeni an additional Intensity ellocouon• page 4 , ,lt Q oats. , ' compolibllity Thls property would act as a translllon area balwoen the ehopping contef directly north and the rosldentlal uses to the south and wool. With good 0114, ar6hooW10, and fandscopo design, en office stwoluto conslotont Wllh the Intensity P01101e8 of the Plan (10,880 square loot) could potentially be an asset at this location, Howovor, the applicant has proposed on amount of Office spaco that grossly exceeds Ilia maximum allowed by the plan, and 'e proposing only to blue metal oxtortors hom the Lllllan Mlllor frontage. A bufferyaid Is proposed, but It lacks Iho required foncing, and there to no Idenihcatlon as to its local on. No addlllonol site landscaping Is proposed, olhor than that rogolied by the Olys Landscaping, screening, and Troo Proservatlon ordinance, Tols location has long bean IdoWled as a W axlromely sensltlvo to use, scale, and ooithoUo Issues. The pelitlon, as proposed, Is In the staff's oplnlon ImOquate to address these long Idontlflod concerns, e app can propose 00770766 1181 o can ons 1. Restricted list of permitted uses (Attachment 2), 2. Total floor area for all buildings constructed on the tract of land not exceed 25,000 square feet. The allocated Intensity of 160 Intensity trips would allow a maximum floor area of 10,666 square feet. The applicant has proposed an amount of square footage that Is 134% greater than the allowed maximum, 3, All loading dock and dumpster Areas shall be screened from view of Lillian Miller by solid, opaque, screens (fences, walls, or vegetation), reaching a height of at least six (s) feet above grade, If vegetation Is chosen, the owner of the property shall malntaln such that It rem,glns opaque throughout each Sear, 4. That corrugated, or any other metal exterior, shall not be allowed on any new building elevation visible from Lillian Miller for any now buildings, 5. The owner of the property shall maintain all tre-%rt larger than two (2) Inches In diameter within ten (10) feet of any prooerty line not along Lillian Miller. 6, No °off-premise" signs (as defined by Section 33.2 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, or Its successor) will be permitted. 7. Bufferyard standards would be a Class "C" bufferyard, whiok, consists of four (4) canopy and eight (8) understory trees in a fifteen (16) foot wide I strip per each one hundred linear feet. 8. No direct oft-site lighting. 8. Maximum height of buildings two stories, Conway Street Is a private driveway dedicated by the J.W. Frwln SUbdIvIsIon to Page 6 N M V f' qe a o.. - owners of property in that subdivision. Conway Street is not, and rlh qc. dedicated City of Denton public street. No owner was listed on thil' street, however, a letter was found in the 1991 case file regarding the street, and is ` Attachment 3. For the Council's information, Traffic Engineering took 24-hour traffic counts at two locations along Lillian Miller in February 1995. LOCATION 1995 1993 1992 1991 1990 South of 1-35 20,898 13,859 11,709 12,087 9,754 North of Southridge 12,672 10,141 9,037 9,048 6,382 HECOMMENOATION The Commission recommends allocation of a disproportionate share of intensity and approval of the Office Conditioned zoning, with the following conditions: 1. A restricted list of uses (see list of prohibited uses Attachment 4). 2. That the total floor area for all buildings constructed on the 2.6662 acres shall not exceed 25,000 square feet. 3. That no loading docks shall be permitted. 4. That the exterior walls of all buildings shall be constructed of brick or brick veneer. 5. The owner of the property shall maintain all trees larger than two (2) inches in diameter, which are located within ten (10) feet of any property line, other than a property line fronting on Lillian Miller Parkway. 6. No "off-premise" signs (as defined by Section 33-2 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, or its successor) shall be permitted. 7. No direct off-site lighting shall be permitted. 8. A "bufferyard" measuring fifteen (15) feet wide, and comprising four (4) canopy and eight (8) undersiory trees per each one hundred (100) linear feet, shall be installed along the western and southern property fines of the subject property. 9. There shall be no second story windows allowed on the western- or southern- facing facades of any buildings located on the subject property. 10. Maximum building height shall not exceed two (2) stories. Page 6 E l~ Ate ALTERNATIVES Aothda elm 1. Approve as requested. 2. Approve as recommended. I Approve with additionaVother conditions. 4. Deny. 5. Postpone consideration. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location map. 2. Proposed list of uses. 3. Letter regarding Conway Street. 4. Recommended list of prohibited uses. Page 7 9 Y 1 s r• i I msi ~,~ld I No. r ` Apen Item , V*V#j" Date ' y . r.:.-: V' ~c), • ~aZ alp 't- L i r.c r tar s ~1+ r;r r OCA~lL"!G WBDfYiS1QY ~PMSE OI+E J !A 11voAsir' Lor ? Lof !R ICL4E17•/G EF IA1f0 C041077L'4fL trs trot[ rsasa Lor to SOUTNWCE MLLA6V S?FAp44 CE,k e 6 CA& F, K. aft, PA BLOCK 4 y QY Q ~ . IdvFO ~j6 ~ 3 y ^ t' - a 41 oe4v ` 9 \ v IdYF~ GEJVLr z RrMl c° \ 8 a~ r IG3vEL7 Sf /c . • y~o I ~ N REQUESTED- 8 OFFICE - ~i Y inr r.4 s.~ \ N as•:r rM• r tes."r \ L ge,Ita ND, uou o=fine District z +th As7erida Item pjRMITTED USESe 0a;e Primary Residential rare Unit Deyelepaenfs Hate or Mob-l! Educational, Institutional & special Uses Art Gallery or Museum Church or Rectory College or University or Private School Day Nursery or Kindergarten School -Gratip 179mee- 4W, 94;fty me-eer Hospital (colter 9, ea-r-9-1) Institutions of Religious or Philanthropic Nature Public Library Monastery or Convent " WmrsiP4 Home or Residence 000-1-400-1 6~18M School, Business or Trade Utility, Accessory and incidental Urea Qamunky eenter (Priyat" Elee F-1--a-1 WKNA_N@W~Wca Line- T__•+rsrie plal~..~ n_~_i._. X11 ..ce+ Ic ♦ i wry=~*w►~ centr ,No-* occupat"M Telephone, Business Office ns!h tzza 041. ._=Gtabien Recreational and Entertainment Useg GOURGIFY C4Ub a c v);iz crr002f ewcrae Otis Tr napo a 0 Related Uses l F r Z "Qt' office District (continugal AGOG No. Agenda tem Retail and Service Type Uges Date Offices, Professional and Administrative Studio for Photographer, Musician, Artist or Health Agricultural Tune Usec Animal Clinic or Hospital (No outside runs or pens) PERMITTED USES WITH APPROVED SPECIFIC USX Q MIT• Educational- Institutional_ special. Uses y 99uJue fuz Care of Utility. Accegpny and In .{dental Uses vILhIlir $LilAing, Chepp yard-ef Raee}, ezete-er i-e Pik TIC Transpo*tation Related uses 1-id H Retail and service Type Uses .Ca~atel~e Mortuary ur-ran*re4-a&r4-s*- ~Restanrar[t , o MArcial Type Ltses Scientific or Research Laboratories YARD Front Yard: Minimum 25 feet. Side Yard;., )to side„yard ,is-specified for non-residential use except where anon-residential use abuts upon a district boundary line dividing such districts from a residential district or when the side yard is adjacent to the street, in which event a ten (10) foot side yard shall be provided. Rear Yard: No rear year is specified.for non-residential use except where retail, commercial or industrial uses back upon a common district.line, whether separated by an alley or not, dividing the district from any of the residential districts listed, a minimum of ten (10) feet shall be provided. G c • C ~ -"Olt Office District (continuedf Agenda No Agenda Item Date rte,=___ WEIGHT REd LATION9! Any legal limit, except as-follows: In the districts where the height of buildings is restricted to two (2) 0*-%U*eo j2+ Oise , cooling towers, roof gables, chimneys and vent stacks may extend for additional height not to exceed forty- five (45) feet above the average grade lino of the building. Water f stand pipes and tanks, church steeples, domes and spires, and school buildings and institutional buildings may be erected to exceed three (3) stories in height in residential areas restricted to two (2) or three (3) stories in height, provided that one additional foot shall be added to the width and depth of side and rear yards for each foot that such structures exceed three (3) stories in height. RUPPLENENTAL REODLATIONSS 1. Parking (Based on use. See Article 34--115.) 2. Signs 3. Lighting 4. Landscaping 5. Screening and Fencing /3. s F C • Sgenda Mo.[ Southwest Agenda item Federal Savings Date HIGHLAND PARK WEST 4300 MacArthur Avenue Dallm, Uxas 75209 r February 15, 1991 t Mr. Randy Carter senior vice President First State Bank 101 South Locust Denton, Texas 76201 SUBJECT: QUITCLAIM DEED TO FIRST STATE BANK OF CONWAY CONWAY STREET Dear Mr. Carter: The following is a summary of the agreement between First State Bank (Bank) and Southwest Federal Savings Association (SWFSA) regarding Conway Street (an abandoned private street). SWFSA will execute a Quitclaim Deed to Bank and has agreed in return as compensation to SWFSA, the following: 1) The Quitclaim Deed will be executed once the proposed rezoning of the property owned by Bank is approved. 2) Bank will build a six foot brick wall with columns appropriate to enhance the value of the adjoining residential lot development facing the east side and facing Conway, the street area. Estimated cost approximately $20,000. 3) Bank will comply with the city landscaping requirements refleting the Conway Street area to include a berm, shrubs, and sprinkler system. Estimated cost approximately $75,000. 4) The second floor of the office building structure will. have no windows facing south or west to the Conway area. ~Y Y i PS( eF rI • Agenda No. Agenda Item C Date Mr. Randy Carter First State Bank Page 2 5) Bank will escrow funds at SWFSA for the landscaping and fence at the time the Quitclaim Deed is executed. oofFSth belsubdivision h and o the improvements lots affectedd by enhance the the proposed development by Bank. The above ,is a summary of the basic business terms of our agreement. our agreement is subject to the execution of mutually acceptable document, which address the business and legal details. I would appreciate if you would acknowledge this and return an original to me for my records. Sincerely, . 'Yl Michael J. Moin9om Credit Specialist RTC Acknowledged by: First State Bank By: Its: Date: F i' ATTAq"WST Agenda No Agenda Item LIST OF PROHIBITED USES Date Z-"7 Community Unit Development Dormitory, Boarding or Rooming House Hotel or Motel Community Center (Public) Group Homes Halfway House Hospital (General Acute Care) Hospital (Chronic Care) Nursing Home or Residence Home for Aged Occasional Sales Park, Playground or Public Community Center School, Private Primary or Seoondary School, Public or Denominational Accessory Building Community Center (Private) Electrical Substation Electrical Transmission Line Temporary Field or Construction Office (Subject to Approval and Control by Building 01110"r) Fire Station or Similar Public Safety Building Gas Transmission Line and Metering Station Home Occupation Off Street Parking Incidental to Main Use Off Street Remote Parldng Sewage Pumping Station Private Swimming Pool Telephone Line 6 Exchange Switchino or Relay Station Water Reservoir, Water Pumping Stallon or Well Country Club (Private) with Goff Course Public Golf Course Public Park or Playground Public Play field or Stadium Swim or Tennis Club Railroad Track or Right-of-way Farm or Ranch Cemetery or Mausoleum Fraternity, Sorority, Lodge or Civic Club Home for Care of Alcoholic, Narcotic, or Psychiatric Patients Public Building, Shop, Yard of Local, Stale, or Federal Government Radio andlor Television Microwave Tower Water Treatment Plant A rport Landing Field or Heliport Commercial Parking Lot or Structure Cafeteria Mortuary or Funeral Parlor Restaurant Y Z-96-007 ATTACHMENT 2 Agenda No.~ Agenda Item Date ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY 16 (SF-16) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO THE OFFICE CONDITIONED (0[c]) ZONING ' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 2.6662 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY APPROXI- MATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF I-35E; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.0[ FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Mr. Rob Rayner, on behalf of First State Bank of Denton, initiated a change in zoning for 2.6662 acres of land from the Single Family 16 (SF-16) zoning district classification and use designation to the Office Conditioned (O(c]) zoning district classification and use designation; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 1996, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of a change from the Single Family 16 (SF-16) zoning district and use classification to the Office Conditioned (0[c]) zoning district and use classification; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 2.6662 acres of land described in Exhibit 1, is changed from the Agricultural (A) zoning district classification and use designation to the Office Conditioned (0(c]) zoning district classification and use designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the uses described in the list attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 2, shall be prohibited within this district, in addition to those ordinarily prohibited by the Commercial classification or any other condition listed herein. 2. That the total floor area for all buildings constructed on the 2.6662 acres shall not exceed 25,000 square feet. 3. That no loading docks shall be permitted. 4. That the exterior walls of all buildings shall be constructed of brick or brick veneer. 5. The owner of the property shall maintain all trees larger than two (2) inches in diameter, which are located within /7 F Agenda No. Agenda Item I Date ten (10) feet of any property line, other than a property line fronting Lillian Miller Parkway. 6. No "off-premise" signs (as defined by Section 33-2 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, or its succes- sor) shall be permitted. 7. No direct off-site lighting shall be permitted. 8. A *bufferyard* meuvuring fifteen (15) feet wide, and comprising four (4) canopy and eight (8) understory trees per each one hundred (100) linear feet, Shall be in- stalled along the western and southern property lines of the acreage described in Exhibit 1. 9. There shall be no second story windows allowed on the western- or southern-facing facades of any buildings located on the acreage described in Exhibit 1. 10. Maximum buildir:3 height shall not exceed two (2) stories. SECTION, II. Tr.at the City's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification. SECTION III. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary ` is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, a daily newspaper published in the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 19:+6. BOB CASTLEF;RRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: PAGE 2 v y5 f Agenda No, _ Agenda Il'emv✓ Dafe.~_.L.O._~ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY. i I PAGE 3 /9. 4 R i I Agenda N0. 2 ~x?}161T Agenda tam Dale M i DESCRIPTION OF 2.6662 ACRES IN THE JOHN McCOWEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 797, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENTON, TEXAS. ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE JOHN McGOWEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NU14BER 797, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BEING ALL OF LOTS 6, 7 AND 8, BLOCK 1, J. W. ERWIN SUBDIVISION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 337, PAGE 530, DEED RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6 WHICH IS THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3R, BLOCK 1, J. W. ERWIN SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN CABINET E, PAGE 96, PLAT RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND IN THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY A DISTANCE OF 449.32 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8, BLOCK 1, AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A CALLED 5.1649 ACRE TRACT, TRACT 1, AS DESCRIBED IN A DEED FROM, TERI TAYLOR COMPANIES, INC., TO MAVEX 9, INC., ON THE 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1992, AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 3417, PACE 0001, REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 8 AND THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID MAVEX 9, INC. TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 258.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CONWAY STREET IN THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 11, BLOCK A, THE RIDGE OF SOUTHRIPGE, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN CABINET D, PAGE 330, PLAT RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY OF CONWAY STREET A DISTANCE OF 449.39 FEET TO THE NCRTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6 AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3R; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 09 SECONCS EAST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 3P. A DISTANCE OF 258.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 2.6662 ACRES OF LAND. o2 a. a ..:1 3 r' . P&Z Minutes ATTACHMENT 3 Agenda No. 2C 4 April 24, 1996 Agenda Item Page 2 Date-~C) Ms. Russell: We will now go into a closed meeting to consider legal matters under the Texas Government Code 551.071. It is now 5:15 p.m. Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, April 24, 1996, and began at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 215 E. McKinney. Meeting called to order at 6:05 p.m. L Consider approval of the minutes of the April 3, 1996 meeting. Ms. Russell: Are there any corrections to the minutes? Mr. Powell: I move approval of the minutes as presented. Mr. Cochran: Second. Ms. Russell: Any discussion? All in favor please raise your right hand. Opposed same sign. Approved. (6-0) 17. Hold a public hearing and consider a request to rezone 16) zoning district to the Office conditiioned (O[c])zoning district. from sub e ~ p oFerty i1o ated on the west side of Lillian Miller, approximately 500 feet south of I-35. (Z-96-007) is located Ms. Russell read the rules of procedure for the public hearing and opened the public hearing. Mr. Reeves: This is a rezoning of 2.6662 acres on the west side of Lillian Miller just south of the Red Lobster. We mailed nineteen notices out on April 12th. We received three responses in opposition and two in favor. At this point in time, I don't know if the 20% rule will be in effect, but it will probably be pretty close. The fast time rezoning was attempted in February of 1991, it was for a Planned Development for a five-thousand square-foot restaurant, which was Owens, and a twelve-thousand square-foot office. The request before you tonight is for the Office conditioned zoning district. There is a list of conditions that the applicant is proposing for the property in your backup on page 16. The applicant is proposing to restrict the list of permitted uses. The total floor area for all buildings is not to exceed twenty-rive thousand square feet. The loading dock and dumpster areas will be screened. Corrugated or metal exteriors will not be allowed on any building elevation visible from Lillian Miller. The owner will maintain all trees larger than two inches in diameter within ten feet of the property line. There will be no off-premise signs allowed. The applicant is proposing a class C bufferyard which would consist of four canopy and eight under-story trees per everyone hundred linear feet in a fifteen-foot wide strip. There is no location proposed for that, and our normal C bufferyard would also have a six-foot fence. Condition number eight is that there will be no direct off-site lighting and the final condition is that maximum height of the buildings will be two story, which in the Office zoning district the maximum height is three stories. In your backup, you have the analysis that was done in reference to the DDP. The proposed twenty-five thousand square-foot building would exceed what is allowed by the Plan by a hundred and thirty-four percent. The maximum square footage that would be allowed by the Plan would be ten thousand, six hundred and sixty-six square feet. There is no site plan proposed. The Plan calls for strict site da. p. Agenda No. P&Z Minutes Agend Item April 24, 1996 MIT Page 3 Date _ I / SF,_ plan control within sixteen hundred feet of existing low density residential, traffic designed to ensure that multi-family or non-residential uses have access to collectors or larger arterials with no direct access through residential streets. The proposal would meet that; there is direct access to Lillian Miller which is an arterial level street. This is somewhat inconsistent with the green space. There was a neighborhood meeting on April 3rd, and I can't say that there was a lot of support for the project as it was presented that night. Neighborhood servi-.e center concentration: the plan would allow up to five acres along a freeway, three acres along Lillian Miller; and this property is 2.6 acres, so it would meet that requirement of the Plan. We also have some policies that directly relate to Lillian Miller. Two of those are that the neighborhood density and intensity standards should be closely monitored and vigorously in;plemented. The proposal exceeds the Plan intensity by a hundred and thirty-four percent. Curb cut; are restricted on Teasley Lane, F.M. 2181, Lillian Miller, and Hobson Lane. There is already an existing driveway cut, and there may be a possibility of obtaining another right rum, only out from the property. The other two criteria for the Lillian Miller specific area policies aren't applicable to this case as they apply to residential subdivisions and through traffic to Dallas/Ft. Worth Airport. Staff is not recommending approval of this conditioned rezoning for a number of reasons that are in your backup. It is not consistent with several important areas of the Plan, those being intensity, site plan, and separation of the strip commercial development. We are not saying that this property shouldn't be used for office; we are saying that it should be done as a Planned Development where the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Council have the opportunity to took at a plan and see what it is they are proposing and see how it is going to work. Ms. Russell: Would the petitioner care to speak? Mr. Rob Rayner: My name is Rob Rayner, and my office is at 1108 Dallas Drive, Suite 310. We did have a neighborhood meeting, and there were nine families represented. The owner of the property feels that the Office conditioned zoning is the best use of the property. At die neighborhood meeting, we addressed several issues, and we feel that some of those issues have been meet with this conditional zoning from the past as well as the present concerns that they have. One of them is that you have permanent uses that are office in nature. Many of the uses that we have in the Office zoning have been marked out. We marked out the restaurant use from the list of permitted uses which would eliminate any unpleasant smells. You would have traditional office hours of eight to five with no late night activity so the unpleasant noise would not be there. We have a condition for no off-site lighting. We are using the Office conditional zoning because it protects the surrounding neighborhood, and the neighborhood will know what is permitted, and those uses will be disclosed. The condition restricts the building size as well as addressing the bufferyard standards. This helps the neighborhood realize the natural beauty that will be used to screen the building from the residential neighbors. By using the conditional Office zoning, the city allows the landowner to market his property with disclosed restrictions that can be flexible to a variety of users fitting with the permitted uses. The reason that we like the conditional zoning is because we have seen that it works very well with different kinds of zoning, meeting different needs within the city. With your PD zoning, because we do not have a buyer, or a user at this point, we don't know what kind of office will be there or what shape that office will be. If we are restricted to a PD, as the staff has recommended, then we are obligated to follow that specific size and shape. If we have a user that doesn't need that, then they will have to come back before you to have it changed; and we think that is a little cumbersome for them. We feel that if we can have the flexibility as this conditioned Office zoning has allowed in previous cases; it gives us some flexibility. The conditioned zoning has been a3. J 1 a i .rrl 1 Agenda No. P&Z Minutes Agenda If em April 24, 1996 Date 1~' Page 4 a wonderful alternative, as opposed to PDs and straight zoning. We need to have the flexibility and to be able to maximize the market potential for the property. Mr. Cochran: All of the list of uses that have been eliminated were done by you and the property owner? Mr. Rayner: Yes, and the conditions were done by the property owner. Ms. Russell: Did you have this list of conditions when you met with the neighborhood? Mr. Rayner: No. Our feeling was to have the neighborhood meeting and see what the neighborhood wanted, and then we could address that with the conditions and the permitted uses. It was quite apparent from the meeting that the neighborhood wanted residential use, so we felt that by looking at past experiences with this tract of land, the feast offensive use and the highest and best use for the land was Office. We knew that the intensity trips for an office would be less than a restaurant. The owner feels that it would be a very nice office location. Ms. Russell: Is there anyone to speak in favor of the petition? Is there anyone to speak in opposition to the petition? I have cards from Clint Ballard and Chris Schweiker, and they are both in opposition. Mr. Skip Beard: My name is Skip Beard, and I live at 2304 Stonegate. There is a tremendous amount of interest in this particular issue from the people in that neighborhood. There are a lot of concerns with this rezoning. Talking about property values, talking about concerns regarding changes that can occur once a zoning change takes place in order to accommodate a certain type of building and then that building plan somewhat changes over time as a result of marketplace conditions or buyers changing their mind. Those kinds of changes end up occurring after the fact with little opportunity for anyone to do anything about them. All of those are concerns that the neighborhood has. They have a high stake in their property values and what goes on in that particular area of the city. Ms. Jane Graner: My name is Jane Graner, and 1 live at 2400 Stonegate Circle. Currently, my home is the only residence that is within two hundred feet of the site. I am concerned with traffic and property values especially since my property backs up to this site. I have a lot of concerns. This is my dream home that I worked very hard for. After graduating from TWU in 1984, 1 decided that I wanted to make this my permanent home. 1 bought this lot with the understanding that it backed up to residential property. 1 wanted a lot with good access to 1-35, yet I was very concerned about privacy and light pollution. For me, star gazing as an amateur astronomer is a very important passion of mine. I deliberately chose a lot that was as far away from street tights as possible. If any kind of office goes up, even with only indirect security lighting, that will greatly inhibit my ability to enjoy my love of stars. Moreover, my privacy will be compromised. In addition to light pollution, there will be noise pollution; and also, if this zoning change goes through, it may take years to sell the other lots that are there on Stonegate Circle. I ask that you protect us from this zoning erosion, its effects on our neig►soorhood; and I appeal to you as a citizen to protect me and my home from these adverse effects of having to live right next door to it. Mr. Powell: The other lots that are there are not occupied at this time? C>? 5( 4 1 P&Z Minutes April 24, 1996 Agenda No. Page 5 Agenda Nm Date Ms. Graner: Not at this time. Dr. Ray Stephens: My name is Ray Stephens, and I live at 619 Ridgecrest. When the citizens who live adjacent to the property that is the subject of this rezoning request and the citizens who live in the affected neighborhood invested in their homes, they put a considerable amount of their limited capital at risk. For most of them, this purchase is the greatest amount of capital outlay they will personally face in their lifetime. Obviously, they looked over the neighborhood to get an idea of the quality of life where they would invest. They may have searched through the maps at City Hall to find the parameters of residential zoning that would provide some space from the higher intensity zoned area, to locate their homes where the noises and smells associated with non-residential uses would not crowd up against them. They expected and depended upon local government to protect them from an erosion of zoning that would seriously jeopardize their investment and diminish the quality of life they enjoy in their neighborhood. A major concern is the adverse effect of property values on adjacent homes and homes in the neighborhood if the rezoning is done. Many of the citizens who have reservations to this proposed rezoning are those who would not have purchased homes in this area if they had even suspected that city government would not honor what amounts to a pledge to help preserve their property values by keeping the parameters of residential zoning in tact. I respectfully request that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny this attempt to invade this neighborhood with Office conditional zoning with all of the flexibility that makes such zoning so open ended. How much farther will city government allow the erosion to go? What good is a plan if it is not adhered to? The plan for this neighborhood, made in good faith, as the highest and best use, and subsequently followed by city government, has been in place for some time. We have existing higher intensity uses nearby; we have zoning for residential in place. Please help preserve the existing plan for residential community development that has been in place for approximately the last thirty years. Mr. Powell: You talked about flexibility. You talked about Office zoning having a lot of flexibility. it would appear to me that the applicant has taken out almost all of the flexibility with the conditions that he has added. Dr. Stephens: If the zoning is changed from residential to something else, then it is much easier to come back to the Council to have adjustments made. The idea seems to me that one of the best protections we have is to keep it residential so that we won't have to worry about repeated trips here as Office conditional may be adjusted. I heard what was said; I was at the neighborhood meeting that Mr. Rayner talked about. And at that time, the same thing I am expressing here was made there- that if we had our choice, we'd rather keep it residential. Ms. R.swil: Dr. Stephens, I have a question. I wasjust asking Mr. Robbins to refresh my memory; I know this is bigger than a collector street. Lillian Miller is a secondary arterial street and it's quite a busy street. To my memory, there are no residences that open on to this street along there. Do you recall? Dr. Stephens: Not at this time; however, the lots south, right next to the lots in the petition, on down to Southridge Drive, were set up as garden-type homes back in the mid-80s, not Single Family 16, as in the interior. At least it maintains its residential nature. The idea is that the zoning was in place, but no residences were built. There are no residences that face Lillian Miller in this particular area. as. P&Z Minutes AOM111 NO. ~r-- nd Him April 24, 1946 AoeDate Page 6 Ms. Russell: This is quite a busy street, and I am trying to recall that there are not residences that face this street. Since they can't face any other way on Lillian Miller, would you want to build a home there? Dr. Stephens: The developer of the entire Southridge area chose to build his home on the interstate. Mr. Cochran: You mentioned the time frame of thirty years; when was Lillian Miller Parkway planned through there? Dr. Stephens: About mid-80s. Mr. Robbins: That's correct. Mr. Cochran: So at the time that these were zoned, residential Lillian Miller was not on the plans? Dr. Stephens: That is correct. Mr. Robbins: If my memory is correct it might have been zoned with a road planned through it called Ridgeway. Dr. Stephens: The Ridgeway that you are talking about became Lillian Miller. The original plan was in 1465. The entire area was set up as residential. Mr. Moreno: I have a question? If this rezoning was approved, could the petitioner come back and ask that these conditions be removed. Mr. Robbins: That would require another rezoning, and you would review that, and it would go to the Council. Mr. Mitch Vexler: My name is Mitch Vexler, and I am the second developer of Southridge East and the Ridge of Southridge. I am currently the largest landowner in the immediate vicinity. I have sold well over a hundred lots in the area, and I plan on developing another nine acres on the immediate boundary of the property in question. 1 also build over a million square feet a year-single family, multi-family, office, and single family subdivision. I don't object to an "office" use, but what I object to is the question of flexibility. What has been proposed...1 believe that tract of land should be used for medical doctor's offices; however, with certain conditions put on it. There is a reasonable solution to what is at hand here; however, what has been proposed and the method that it has been proposed in, is not the best for the subdivision, and it is not in my best interest as a landholder. What has been taken off of the list are uses that never would have been put there in the first place. What has been offered as the applicant's proposed conditions, in my opinion, I wouldn't be caught dead building property with these types of restrictions on them. The applicant is proposing that corrugated or any metal exterior shall not be allowed on any new building elevation visible from Lillian Miller. Corrugated is butler; butler is a steel frame with a steel exterior. The lots that back up to that particular tract have roughly three-hundred- to five-hundred-thousand dollar homes on them. That is what I plan on building or having built on those lots. You don't put a butler building next to that caliber of home. There are other things such as lighting; lighting issues can be resolved. Q'6 . M V r P&Z Minutes A~~nda Item _j April 24, 1996 Page 7 Date ' The other conditions that are here such as off-site signage and off-site premises are insignificant, What is significant is the fact that they have requested a two-story maximum height. You don't want a two-story building being able to look into the back yard of these homes. The concept of putting a two-story building there, in my opinion, would be out of the question. For those reasons, I am in strong opposition to the way that this proposal has been submitted, although I do not oppose the office-type use. Mr. Cochran: Would you propose that we make our decision on this zoning based on the value of the houses behind this property? Mr. Vexler: No. I am currently developing over a thousand multi-family units in the metroplex, and one of those properties is in Lewisville. We had eighty-thousand dollar duplexes in the backyard of a particular tract of land with an alley in between. The people in the duplexes had no objection to the multi-family, but they had an objection to my original layout. I had a third story that looked over the duplexes, so I changed by layout and had a solid brick wall facing the duplexes. Anything that is over two story will be able to see over an eight-foot fence and it will affect the value of the lots and the value of the homes. What you want is a high-class facility that is representative of the area with a brick facade. I sold tots to the majority of the people in the audience, and I have an obligation to them and to future developers to make sure that whatever goes in that subdivision is representative of that area. There shouldn't be a butler building in that area, and it shouldn't be a tv o story building in that vicinity. Mr. Powell: Aren't the houses in the area two story? Mr. Vexler: You are talking about a house versus an office building. Mr. Powell: You can still see over the eight-foot fence. Mr. Vexler: But you are not talking about something that backs into one lot after another, and there is a big difference. An office building has anywhere from a fifteen- to seventeen-loot floor plate and a house has a ten-foot floor plate. That is five to seven feet per floor which would be ten to fourteen foot height difference, not to mention what goes upon the roof. You could end up with a two-story building that has an overall height of forty-two feet. Ms. Russell: If it were a brick building and there were no windows on the back? We had a case farther down the street where it is a two-story building, but there are no windows on the back to overlook the neighborhood. Mr. Vexler: There is a piece of land next to that property that is currently zoned SF-16, and I own it; and if you had that type of facility; then 1 would have to contend that. You could have a two-story building with no wirtdows on two sides and that would be one ugly building. I would object to that. Ms. Vera Gershner. My name is Vera Gershner, and I live at 2312 Stonegate Circle. The reason why I have chosen to speak tonight is because we have lived there the longest, and we have the largest home. We chose to build a large home because my husband has been diagnosed with a debilitating illness, and we knew that over time he would be increasingly handicapped. We built a d r- Hyenaa P&Z Minutes Agenda Item April 24, 1996 Date l Page 8 home for a multi-family dwelling. We live with my daughter and her family. When we decided to build such a large home and commit the rest of our life to that, we looked all over the county before we decided to build in Denton. We have a large investment to protect. When you buy a piece of property, you should be able to count on the zoning of that area and the protection that you assume is in those contracts when you first sign them. We have a lot of concern in the area, and I want to support the things that Ray Stephens said. 1 really would tike to thank the city for their recommendation. I hope that you will protect our neighborhood in a way that we won't have to keep coming back. Dr. George Christy: My name is George Christy, and I live at 2416 Southridge Dr. I would like to ask a question, and that is, "who is the present owner of the property and who is representing this petition?" Mr. Reeves: The owner of the property is First State Bank, and they are also the petitioner. Dr. Christy: My problem with the petition is that it is intentionally vague, and, because of its vagueness, it is untimely. The last time that we were here addressing the Owen's Family Restaurant, we knew the nature of the use, and we could visualize the problems, such as the hours of operation, the congestion, the extent in short the adjoining property owners and those nearby would be inconvenienced. Here we have a very generalized petition to open this property to office usage. I will not say that I am unalterably opposed to putting offices in there, but I would like to have a little more definite information and a little more definite idea of just what sort of offices are going in. I would like to have the ability to judge for myself how much congestion and how much inconvenience might result to property owners in our area. 1 think for that reason, the fact that we do not know precisely what use the property will be put to, or exactly what the result will be to the neighboring area, that this petition is untimely and should be rejected, at least until we have a more definite sort ` of petition and prospective usage. Ms. Russell: Dr. Christy, you brought up a very good point. (Read the list of permitted uses that the applicant is proposing.) (Read the names, off of the yellow comment cards, of those people in opposition but not wishing to speak: Andrea Saddler, Dean Saddler, Tobye Nelson, Alice Greenspoon, Mrs. Gil Adami, and Charlotte Whaley.) Mr. Alvin Whaley: My name is Alvin Whaley, and 1 live at 2364 Hollyhill. 1 can't say that my opposition is that great, but there are a lot of questions that are unanswered. 1 heard key words such as loading docks and corrugated metal buildings. 1 would say that it needs a lot more research before we finalize it. Mr. R.B. Escue: My name is R.B. Escue, and I live at 707 Ridgecrest. I am about three hundred feet from the properly in question. I built my house in 1965; there was no Golden Triangle Mall, there was no Lillian Miller, and the only thing that was along 1-35 was the Texas neon sign. That one little place has developed into Southridge Village, which was supposed to be a moderate area and is already well over the moderate configuration. The petitioners are asking not for strip zoning, but for spot zoning. For some reason, we have Provid-nt Bank coming in and establishing a commercial place on an SF-16 lot, which the city has never been able to explain. That is to the north. To the south, you have what is called single family detached. All of that area was SF-16 in order to protect ti i P&Z Minutes .agenda No. 96 April 24, 1996 Agenda Item fi f-) Page 9 Date l the existing homes which were there in Southridge, and to give us some latitude of buffering with respect to encroachment. That is disappearing. I certainly hope that you will hold the petitioner to a more stricter situation because of the situation of spot zoning that would be involved in this particular case. Ms. Russell: Is there anyone else to speak in opposition? Do you wish to hear from Mr. Vexler again? Mr. Vexler: The petitioner brought up the marketability of the land without him being able to change the zoning. In the past year, I have bought about five hundred acres of commercial land and single- family land and, on occasion, some of the land is not zoned the way that I want in order to develop it. In that case, l go to City Council and get it rezoned. Basically, this land is in the same position. If I was a buyer for this tract of land, it is in a good location, it is a good tract of land; if I was interested in it, I would make an offer conditioned on rezoning. At that point in time, 1 would make my presentation. This is not the time or the method in which it needs to be done. It needs to be marketed under the current zoning and if someone is interested in the property, then that is the time to bring a petition to the Commission. Ms. Russell: Is there anyone else to speak in opposition to the petition? Would the petitioner care to make any rebuttal? Mr. Rayner: One of the things I would like to address is Mr. Stephens saying that Mr. Stiles' home being on I-35; that is true, but the front door is not facing 1-35. What 1 would like to do is to talk about the 1991 case, addressing the restaurant. The owner of the land wishes to use this property for office. What we have done is taken the concerns of the citizens, and we have tried to make it fit those concerns. I do not see where an office building is going to create smells, particularly those smells that we were greatly concerned about when we were talking about a restaurant. I do not see the office hours and the noise being affective when you are talking about an office building that will have a traditional type of time frames, where your restaurants now will stay open until 2:00 in the morning. Back when this case was brought up, there were problems. We had Teasley going under I-35 and it was only two lanes. We now have turn bays, turn arounds, things that help offset the congestion that you have along that corridor. You also have a right turn lane right in front of lack in the Box which was the very issue that Jerry Clark, the city engineer, asked about in 1991. That has been taken care of. The owner, First State Bank, took care of that because it was a need that was there. It was done even though the zoning was turned down. These were importlnt issues eiat the engineering department was looking at. To address the Conway Street situation--Conway Street is a private road. We did quite a bit of investigation work through title companies so that we could find out ownerships. We found that it has been a private drive and is not dedicated to the city. It is not in very good condition because it hasn't been used in a number of years. It is not owned by the applicant or Mr. Vexler. The Denton Development Plan, that was approved in 1988, does not address and could not address the issues that you face in today's market. Conditional zoning is a wonderful tool that the city should use for landowners to give them the flexibility to use their property. It is unfortunate that you all have the backup information, the knowledge; you know the conditions that have been presented before you, and many of the people that are sitting here don't have that wealth of information, so they may not understand when we talk about a metal building. I would have to agree with Mr. Vexler in that I don't think a butler building was intentioned there; ~'g. 4 F ti 1 NgInda No P&Z Minutes Apeadt tern April 24, 1996 Date Page 10 but atone time, Peterbilt, which was then Moore, had a metal building for storage. 1 did not want to have that kind of concept, 1 wanted to have ...if there was going to be some kind of storage and if it was going to be a metal building, then it would have a brick facade. It would be similar to the office building itself. If there is no butler building there at all, then that is fine also. That is the ► reason I put it in there, to cover that particular type of use that I have seen in the past. I think that we have the conditions that fit an office building, and it allows people to use that land in an affective way. 1 don't think the citizens behind me care if the building is U-shaped or L-shaped. I think that they are concerned that we have a good user and that it doesn't stay vacant. I think this conditional Office zoning is a good tool for developers to have the access to use in the City of Denton. Mr. Powell: Do you think that the applicant would accept the conditions that the office building be a brick construction? Do your conditions cover windows on the back side of the building to the south or west? Is that part of the conditions? I have just been informed that it was part of the conditions for 1991, but it is not now. Would you consider those conditions now? Mr. Rayner: Yes, sir, we would. Mr. Drake: I am concerned that this could be misconstrued later and viewed as being a negotiated and prohibited contract zoning issue. I would just like the parties to clarify on the record that this is not a negotiation, that Lt. Powell is just asking about possibilities that the owner might entertain and that Mr. Rayner was speaking about possibilities which would or would not be acceptable to the owner and not any kind of a negotiated zoning case. Mr. Rayner: I go under the concept that the Commission can put whatever conditions they want and I don't mean to imply negotiating. If we did not like those particular items, then we would have the choice of submitting our own to the City Council. Is that not correct, sir? Mr. Drake: You would certainly have the right to appeal. The point that 1 wanted to make is that the Commission is going to make their recommendation to the City Council irrespective or whether it is acceptable to the owner or not. The Commission is going to be acting in the best interests of the community based on the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens at large. I assumed that Lt. Powell was concerned about what may or may not be a developable use for the property; that he was concerned about making sure that whatever the Commission was considering would not be something that would make the property not valuable to the owner, rather than trying to reach any kind of negotiated settlement of zoning. I just wanted to make sure that was clear on the record. Mr. Rayner: Thank you, 1 would not want that to be misconstrued either. Ms. Russell: For an office building, how do you envision the need for a loading dock? Mr. Rayner: I think once again loading dock should have been removed. The dumpster was along the lines of the Moore Business Forms, now Peterbilt. Ms. Russell: We will close the public hearing. Mr. Reeves, would you talk to us a little about Conway Street-how wide and who owns it? ~ D, C P&Z Minutes Agegda tem April 24, 1996 Uate Page 11 Mr. Reeves: Conway Street is a private driveway that was dedicated by the original plat, not only the property in question, but up and down both sides of its length. It is technically a private driveway. This was all the J.W. Irwin Subdivision. 1 think it was platted in the middle 40s and Conway Street was a private driveway dedicated to, and for the use of, residents along it. It is not now, nor has it ever been, a city street. Obviously, when we do the two-hundred-foot notice, we have to identify all the property owners. There is no identifiable owner for Conway Street. I think Mr. Rayner said that his research was unable to identify who owns it. If it were a standard city type 'F street, what normally happens when the city abandons a right-of-way is that adjoining property owners on both sides get half of it. In this particular case, I don't know what would happen. My understanding is that down at the end, where the lots in question are located, it is heavily forested. If there is any pavement left there, it will not be very useable. Conway Street is fifty feet wide. Ms. Russell: In the event that the Office zoning is passed, what is the setback from the back property line? Mr. Reeves: In the Office zoning, I believe the setback is based on the height of the building. There is a minimum setback, and then you add X number of feet for every X number of feet in additional height of the building. It is in your backup on page 22. Ms. Schertz: Is there any situation where this case could come back to us if the Office zoning is passed? Mr. Reeves: Zoning-wise, they would not be back unless they wanted to do something other than what is on the list of uses or in the list of conditions. These are three platted lots, and, at some point, they may want to come in and replat this into one big lot. At that point, it would be a residential replat that would require a public hearing, and would require notice of everyone in the subdivision that lives within two hundred feet. Unfortunately, at this time, there is almost nothing left of the J.W. Irvin Subdivision. A plat is a little bit different from a zoning case. Unless they were asking for some sort of variance, we could send out notices and they could object, but it wouldn't make any difference if it met our requirements-you would be required to approve it. If there is a variance involved and people object, then the 20% rule would come into effect. This means that it could potentially take six members of this body to approve a plat with a variance. This property is in a transition location between the commercial center to the north and the residential uses back behind it. Staff is not necessarily opposed to an office-type zoning because that is a fairly low intensity type of use. The problem that staff has with what is proposed here in front of you tonight is that it is grossly over the intensity allowed by the Plan. It is a hundred and thirty-four percent over allocated. Some of the conditions would be an excellent addition to a planned development; they don't adequately address the issues associated with this site, and, as you can tell from the staff report and the history on this property, it has long been a site that has been known to have certain sensitivities associated with it regarding the scale of the project, the size and type of project and the aesthetics associated with it. While we cannot recommend approval of what has been put in front of you tonight, we don't necessarily think that it is not possible to have an office use there; we just think that it needs to be in a planed development where you can see the arrangement of the site. (Covered the twenty percent rule.) '3/. .r,ua No.1~C75 P&Z Minutes Agenda tem April 24, 1996 - Page 12 Date Mr. Cochran: This is a classic zoning case where the neighborhood interest is against the interests of the developer. It is always the most difficult decisions that we have to make up here. There are a number of excellent points on both sides. There were some points made by some of the neighbors that I am personally sensitive to. Ms. Gershner talked about the contract of zoning and about a bond with property owners, and that is something that comes up here all of the time. It is something that I truly believe in. That is a big issue. There are some other factors here that affect me and one of them is that things have changed over the years and the major factor that affects me is that Lillian Miller has come along and thrown things a little out of kilter. Making this land function as single family area just can't happen; it doesn't seem reasonable to me that someone would want to put their home there. The fact that the petitioner has voluntarily limited their list of uses-! think they are acting in gooa faith, and I think it addresses most of the fears that you all have about how this land may develop. It seems to me that it is destined that something is going to happen there and it will not be single family. We have talked about buffer zones, and it seems to me that you have a natural buffer zone with that abandoned street back there. It would be very difficult for me to look at this and not think that it is a reasonable use. Mr. Moreno: I am concerned about the proposed intensity. 1 think this is the most dangerous intersection in Denton and for that reason, and some others that have been brought up, I am going to vote against this. Ms. Schertz: Often times we are not privileged to know what parties are involved in a situation. This evening we are privileged to know that it is First State Bank; and, living in Denton for over eleven years, I understand that First State Bank is committed to Denton, and they have shown it time and time again. I think that they have shown it again this evening when they have agreed to the conditions and have come forth and given us conditions and restrictions of what they would put there. Based on my confidence and faith in First State Bank, I don't believe they are going to put anything there that would disrupt the community or hurt the homeowners or the value of the property. I think they will keep this in mind. They are here listening tonight; they value the concerns that you have. I think 1 will take this into consideration when I vote this evening. Ms. Russell: I would like to make some comments because I have some concerns about what has been offered. 1 think that it is valid that the construction be all brick, that there be no second-story windows on the south and west side, and that there be no loading dock. If you agree with me, whoever makes the motion, if you would take that into consideration. Mr. Powell: I move we recommend approval of this request to rezone 2.662 acres from the Single Family (SF-16) zoning district to the Office conditioned (O(c]) zoning district with the conditions that it be brick construction, no second-story windows on the south or west side, that there be no loading dock in addition to the applicant's conditions. Ms. Schertz: I'll second. Ms. Russell: Any discussion? All in favor of the motion please raise your right hand. Opposed same sign. Approved. (5-1) Mr. Moreno opposed. f ~iWI~♦ r, i I I, I i Agenda Item . Dale -6 7_Zje_96. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING • DENTON, TEXAS 76201 • TELEPHONE (817) 566.8307 p Olftoe of the City Manager s CITY COUNCIL REPORT c TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council G; FROM: Ted BeriVides, City Manager , DATE: June 13, 1996 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON LOCAL CABLE TELEVISION RATES RECOMMENDATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: Following the Council Work Session briefing on June 11, 1996, and in keeping with provisions in the City's Cable Ordinance, a public hearing has been scheduled in order to receive input from the public regarding local cable television rates. Announcements of the date and time of the public hearing have appeared on two cable channels (25 and 26) for at least five consecutive days. Staff will bring a resolution to approve the local cable television rates to the City Council on July 2, 1996. RACKCROUND: The City is certified by the FCC to regulate local cable television rates for the basic level of cable service, associated equipment such as converters and remote controls, and the hourly service charge. Marcus filed, on February 28, 1996, for a rate increase to be effective June 1, 1996. The City had 90 days from the date of the tiling to review the rate increase before it became effective. The passage of the 90-day time period does not diminish the City's authority or power to approve the rates. It simply means that the rate increase can be implemented. The following table illustrates the pro-June rates which Marcus was charging its subscribers, the original rate increase request, and the modified rate increase which was actually implemented by Marcus on June 1 for those items for which the City has regulatory authority. 'Dedicated to Quality Service" ti City Council Report Agenda No.~ Page 2 Agenda Item Date ( Original Modified Pre-June Rate Rate Rate Request Request Broadcast Basic $ 9.70 $10.26 $10.26 Remote Control $ 0.04 $ 0.14 $ 0.13 Non Addressable Converter $ 1.05 $ 1.21 $ 1.06 Addressable Converter $ 2.27 $ 2.86 $ 2.55 Hourly Service Charge $31.55 $57.41 $42.72 i The City's consultants recommend that Denton approve the modified rates. The lower rate increase will reduce Denton subscribers' cable bills by an average of about $7 per customer per year, or about $107,000 compared to the original rate increase request. Marcus has already implemented the lower rates which were recommended by the consultant. Should these revised rates be approved by Council, no rollback or refunds would be required. PROGRA3fS, DEPARTAfENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED; City Council, Marcus Cable, Cable Television Subscribers within the City of Denton. FISCAL IA/PACT: Consultant: approximately $1,000. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: Prepared by: Ted Benavideess City Manager Richard Foster Public Information Officer Approved: Aortugal Assistant to the City Manager AAAO"EO r2 +r: ~wG• 1. Apende NO..... ..jug- Agenda Item - 1*'o . Dale- CITY of DEMON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING ~ 215 E. McKINNEYa DENTON, TEXAS 76201 {817) 566.8200 o DFW METRO 434-2529 CITY COUNCIL REPORT i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council i FROM: Ted Benavides, City Manager DATE: June 4, 1996 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A TAX REFUND TO DENTEX TITLE COMPANY RECOMMENDATION: The Tax Department has mailed an Overpayment Letter and an Application for Refund to the taxpayer. All completed forms and necessary documentation have been returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Clerk recommends. SUMMARY: Chapter 3 1 .11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $500.00. Dentex Title Company has requested a refund in the amount of $551.63 because they overpaid the tax for Liberty Educational Ministries Inc, on account #035295. BACKGROUND. Dentex Title Company paid $551.63 on November 14, 1995 and Temple-inland Mortgage Company paid $551.63 on December 29, 1995 resulting in an overpayment. Dentex Title Co. is requesting a refund of the overpayment. A tax refund is due. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Tax Department and the tax account of Liberty Educational Ministries, Inc. FISCAL IMPACT: $551.63 "Dedicated to Quality Semi: e" I a City Council Report Agenda NO. Page Apendp item DO/ Please advise if I can provide additional information. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: f_ w Prepared by: Ted Benavides City Manager i Ilene Evans Tax Clerk i 3 Ap roved: 7hF rtune inanc ff icer AAA0449B i 4 r , i; sub P *parry Tam Board APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND RokVWAppscaeon31.11(4/12) Collecting Office Name; CITY Q;: Dr-haou A ends No._L `C _C _ Collecting Tax For: TAX DEPARDAmT Agenda HAM(ol') 216 E MCKINNEY ( axing Units) , _-0 DENTON, TEXAS 76201 Oate Address City, State, Zip Cade - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In order to apply for a tax refund, the following information must be provided by the taxpayer. IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNER: ,y Name: cA ,o.u RlAj F5 IAJe, Address' 1560 o,Uk, r 11t11770,0r yC z07 ,20/7 Telephone Number (if additional information is neededi: IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: ! Description of Property: Sr !4 0. ae t w s ; e R- -64= 40 4 r '40 is s / .Z Address or Location of Property n Account Number of Property: 0.3 5 2 9S or Tax Receipt Number: INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Refund Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested 1. C/r40r- a0rili 19 _4LtY_ / 19 'L5 S S'S/ 4 S Sfi 6 a 201riOtap-.581 19 2 -2-J_/19~+ = 5 6.3 Z 3. 19 / to- i $ Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): lJ r/ a Ca • A" D 0-4Na l1 QAT-AG¢ Co 9AC4 2412 gg T,ax ns> 7-HI-5 IAecEc. , ._DE t)TjE4 7/TC£. C'o• 15 -V^0tJ ~PQtk1.5T/N6, A- .9fFuAJ-0 dF Try' 6tlfA6tVrHEu-r- "I hereby apply for the refund of the abov"eacribed taxes and certify that the information I have given on this form is true and correct" roe l ura~ r /7s E do m mVy Signature, g,urou~ ~x 7W Lot Date of Application for Tax Refund DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval Signature of Authorized Officer Date Signature of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxing Date Unit(s) for refund applications over $500 Any person who makes a false an" upon Me foregoing reco•d shat bs oubioet to ono of the following pon0n; 1. owsonmonl of not more than 10 yore not lase than 2 years and/or a Me of not more than 86,000 or both such ins and Imprisonment; 2. coninemeatin )all fora form up to 1 year or a Me not to oxcaed 82,000 of" such Ilse and Imprisonmont as sN forth In Section 37.10, Penal Code. PEWUO 3111 ti f MAY-30-96 12149 FROM.DENTEX TITLE COMPANY ID.1B175666445 PACE 2/2 ♦ . - " *PMT STATE BANK Dentex Title Company I,ENSOT~Tx . ~ N ~ ELM A s101 Agenda No. DENTON, TX 75201 No. . ifs 95-12880 Agenda It m 0 0 6.3 2.5.";-,? {81 ~ SG60282 PAY Tp E Five Hundred Fifty-One Dollars and Sixty-Thr:3 Cents °A~ AAMW OHDEq OF Noveibek 10, 105 s55i.b3 CITY oK OENTON 215 E. MCKINNEY OB+TEXITim tiCROwACpID"ik i OENTONi TEXAS 76202 Y t1~1 . t1 I 034#T6Z `l S p' 00632SPO':ij19L47421: 1'04'S029't0 4'00000S51reISO. Tom' :DENTO UA uFV SP) :7-tLb T 61 T T < 20 31VIS LVRJ 200701 ®0. igliBO i1 A[i7 Lt.. J [7 .7 r a F REPORT F10R050W 05/28/96 AT 19:17 O V E R P A Y M E N T S ACCOUNT NO. RECEIPT NO. NAME ADDRESS AMOUNT STATUS 0 17318200000 95/03/15-0015 AFV ENTERPRISE INC 2.20 OVERPAY 02178300000,95x03/22.0115 POWERS, BOB C FOWLER DR 20.00 OVERPAY;. 16677700000!95/03/28-0076 rSALDINGER „ BRIAN .D JIM CHRISTAL' R 10.42 OVERPAYr x16677600000 95/03/28-0229 BALDINGER, BRIAN 0 JIM'CHRISTAL R:1.14 OV E R PA Y..0943120000095/03/28-0388. FORD,';LINOA P; MACK PL 31,99 OVERPAY 0275116000095/03/28-0462FOLSEW LEE RIDGECREST CR :730:55 OVERPAY" 02432000000 95/03128-0564 JACKSON, JOSEPH H LINDEN DR 305.49 OVERPAY 17898400000 95/03/28-0567 SUTTON, RUSSEL C CHARLESTON CT 900.00 OVERPAY 10323900000 95/03/28-0642 DEKEMP, RACHEL H LATTIMORE ST 41.71 OVERPAY 19325400000.95/03/28-0643 OARTER,'LYNN A LATTIMOR£ ST 40.50 OVERPAY 13072300000 95/03/29-0471 SAADSHAW, DURWARD 6 JR : SEVILLE-RD 1,3.20,46 OVERPAY,,, ! 13431t00000 95/03/29-0903 XNIOHT 4 MILLER P/S.SHADY. ;OA3(S UR 22.D3 OVERPAYS .15479500000 95/03/29-0968, US ARMY .ENG'01S7 1,74 OVERPA.Y`; 02343400000`95/04/02-1033 "OLUFSEN, ELIZABETH SANTA MONICA D 912.61 OVERPAY " 03346700000 95/04/02-1062 SPRABARY, DARYL W MAPLE ST 149.30 OVERPAY 02996900000 95/04/02-1079 FOX, HOMER S WOOD ST 25.85 OVERPAY 17318200000 95/04/02-1136 AFV ENTERPRISE INC 2.70 OVERPAY 03448500000.95/04/02-.1137. :AFV ENTERPRISE INC 2.70 OVERPAY 09430200000 96/04/021272 SIGGS, ANTHONY C MACK Pi >6.$4 OVERPAY'i 02029400000,95/04/03-0253 :SELLERS', WILLIE' SCOTT 'DR' 24.73 OVERPAY'' 02603600000 95/04/03-0339 HIPPL£.<'JOHN C GEORGETOWN OR 492.86 OVERPAY 0351ZL1nnene a4L04703-0438 GAILEV. DWIGHT L N ELM S7 36E_hFj'(IVFRPAY 000 95/04/03-0439 LIBERTY EDUCATIONAL MINISTRIES INC S BONNIE BRAE 651.63 OVERPAY' 9MR89000 953104103-0773 WVULVLKIUN7. --LTAVE-5 -W REED01M L7T-406.62 OVERPXT_ 51407200000 95/04/05-0063 KECK, TOBY TEASLEY 9 97 L 3.89 OVERPAY I137480000o:95/04/1A-0124 THE STEAM MACHINE 'OAKRIDGE ST, 1.50 OVERPAY; 0224840000095/04/29-0084 VILLARREAL,.BAKER J' IMPERIAL DR! 29.10'OVERPA 9147340000095/04/29-0203 120D 1-35 9307 30.16 OVERPAY 03380$00000 95/04/29-0442 "SORRELLS, RANDY OEWAYNE SCRIPTURE ST5.47:OVERPAY ! 03173200000 95104/30-0425 WIMMER, JEFFREY G 6 TAMARA SALADO ST' 482.49 OVERPAY ' 02972500000 95/04/30-0450 SPRABARY, BETTY MULKEY LN 16.41 OVERPAY 16691000000 95/04130-0649 MADDOX, MICHAEL E WELLINGTON OAK 27.04 OVERPAY 11980200000 95/04/31-0817 STING EAGLE LTD P/S AVE E 62.01 OVERPAY 119x1020000095/04/31-0854 :STING-,EAGLE LTD Pf5 AVE E: 190,11; OVERPAY 90149300000 95/05/010-0102 FIRST INSTANT PRINTING IJ40 N ELM ST II, 69 OVERPAY ' 02369000000 95/05/05.0390 'JORDAN, LOU A': EGAN 'ST 433.29.: OVERPAY 02466500000,85/05 08 0931 GRIFFIN, ERNEST R NOT77NGHAM.OR. 9100;OVERPAY 03151400000 95/05/05-0337 FULLINGTON, JEFFREY D TYLER ST 123.74 OVERPAY 08224600000 95/05/05-0338 TOLLESON, CHRISTIE R DALLAS DR 205.20 OVERPAY 09431200000 95/05/05-0339 FORD, LINDA P MACK PL 33.99 OVERPAY 03357200000 95/05/06-0024 WENDT, WILLIAM L HIGHLAND ST 3.82 OVERPAY 029497.00000 96105/14-0001 ELIZABETH' Irr 2:39OVERPAY 02879500000 95108122+0010 SMITH, 'ANNIE 'R E SHERMAN,01% 'o'of OVERPAY ^I' 02100200000 96/06/26-0008 WILLIAMS. DONALD R EMERY ST 2,00 OVERPAY 80191100000 9510Sj26-0063 RAMA .THAI:CHIN,ESE CUISINE AVE G36,26 OV,£RPAY 91348700006 95/05/27-0017 'HOLT, VICKY 6 HYDE, JEANINE N LOCUST ST 0.07 OVERPAY 91593300000 95/05/27-0019 HOLT, VICKY d HYDE, JEANINE W HICKORY ST 0.02 OVERPAY 51435200000 95/05/28-0025 SHOCKLEE-CARTER, ROSETTA E MCKINNEY 950 0.48 OVERPAY 51429100000 95/05/29-0018 LASLIE, ROBERT E MCKINNEY 917 1.55 OVERPAY 91474300000 051.06108»0012 `A=1'LEASiNG A'SALESDALLAS OR..' 0.10 OVERPAY. o52s61oo000 96/05/15.0005 :BANKS, DOROTHY ESTATE BAILEY:ST- ' 0.89 OVERPAY 61,926400000 9'"6420-.0034 DIAMOND, JUANITA S MAYHILL 11 .126 14.43 OVERPAY Ail P~DY atV ¢puaQY i Agenda No. 9 e AD Agenda Item oL3oZ Date & CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING P215 E. MCKINNEY 9 DENTON, TEXAS 76201 (817) 566.8200 DFW METRO 434.2529 i CITY COUNCIL REPORT i { F TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council f s FROM: Ted Benavides, City Manager DATE: June 5, 1996 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A TAX REFUND TO DENTEX TITLE COMPANY RECOMMENDATION: The Tax Department has mailed an Overpayment Letter and an Application for Refund to the taxpayer. All completed forms and necessary documentation have been returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Clerk recommends. SUMMARY: Chapter 31. 11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $500.00. Dentex Title Company has requested a refund in the amount of $540.93 because they overpaid the tax for Linda K. Berry on account #036160. BACKGROUND: Dentex Title Company paid $540.93 on November 21, 1995 and Chase Manhattan Mortgage Co. paid $540.93 on December 31, 1995 resulting in an overpayment. Dentex Title Company is requesting a refund of the overpayment. A tax refund is due. r PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Tax Department and the tax account of Linda K. Berry. FISCAL IMPACT: $540.93 "Dedicated to Quality Service" .Iw h~j1 4 Agenda No. City Council Report Agenda Item_ Page 2 C- Dale Please advise if I can provide additional information. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: Prepared by: Ted Benavi es I City Manager Ilene Evans Tax Clerk Approved: Jon jjortu'ne Chi Financ Officer Attachment: Application for Tax Refund Copy of Cancelled Check Copy of Overpayment Report AAA044A7 i i V r 08/08/88 07:81 V98178e88288 CITY OF DENTON X002/OOY P,.,"'"W A11"~'TaxMwd APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND C~ apPfiteawl 31.11(4/64 ends ho.._.. - d~ Agenda Hem Coliectng Office Nmw _ Collecting Tax For 216 E McKfNNlY ng Un Address Gty, Stag, Zip Code - In order b apply for a tax refund, the hqlowing information must be provided by ft taxpayer. IDEKTIWAT)ON pF PI1p ER ONrM-A Name A,~.4 kt Address; v Z L7Z -p Telephone Num bow (d additi onal Information is nMI04 y i • 7S I I)- - IDE9ITMPICATION OF PROPERTY: Dasoriptiorl of Property: J9 Q3~8~ 14)eA. ` / s D . Address or Locafion of Property. Account Number of Property: -p IA 0 of Tax Rooeipt Number; INFORMATION ON PAYMEAIT of TAxg& Name of Taxing Unh Year for Amount of From Which Rotund Which Refund Date of iho Amount of Tax Refund Is Requested Is Requesbd Tax Payment Taxes Paid Rsqueated 1. Orr 19 15 -ZL& / 12 $ I-a&] 19 2. 19 10 /19, = $ TaximeWs reason for refund (mch suppofting documeMatlonX X / t2om e y Aw D -e 85 0,1) ZI&S zOil4&41 ZW7E if - I i Te r! ir. J ,Qt , r a Ofru A) F Wt _ O dt..PMY".A) r "I f weby apply for the refund of Via abovsdeaonbed texas and certify that as IMCrmalion I have given on this form Is true and Correct- fee ; 'Aaw -rlf[z Ca . A- .3OV.f/ j5r-M , Set for (0 3 i Sbnabue T XW, )e 1 -40 l Dots of Wicaffoh for Tax Refund - - - - - DETEAMINATION FOR TAX AIIFUND: Approval Diaapprovtd Signature of Auihorfzed Oftef Data signature of PnWdx1g Officer(s) of Taxing Dote Unh(a) for rafund applications over MOO Any pers.- who alahee a taws w" upon themmeshm reaordalwi w aubjaetaoa.aelofsaowYp peelft%. 1. 'Moo 180 loneldof reel mere 91" 10 YOM eer is" than 1 YOM aMror a tine of net mere plan UAW or bew Such *V and im9rNMI rant; A oon41w1wrd in (aa for a term WP a t y.er Or a fine net to exceed JISM of peal am* On and 1 p In " wo w sal Isr* In Seeetkw $7.10, Pend Code, wuw: m n 4 mionda No. f - Dentex Title Company FOIST STAIN ♦ ESCROWACCOUNT 300 N. ELM, SUITE 101 DENTONNTON, TX TX 76201 GFO 95-1428R NO. 0 0 6 4 6 7 (817) 568-0282 PAY Five Hundred Forty Dollars and Ninety-Three Cents DATE AMOUNT TO THE ORDER OF November 17, 1995 $540.93 CITY OF DENTON 215 E. HCKINNEY Df,NTE) tt COM ANY•EBCROW OUNT OENTON. TEXAS 76201 00 11000646 711' 1: 1119 L474 2l: ROO4 5029 r2o 1000000540931 11 171 ltl;vati~ ;t1r.i ti A 5 REPORT FIOR05DW 06/04/46 AT 19:19 O V E R P A Y M E N T S PAGI,. ACCOUNT NO. RECEIPT NO. NAME ADDRESS AMOUNT STATUS OF PAYI 61199201000 95/06/27-0008 MEEKS. JOHN WESLEY S MAYHILL N 23 0.67 OVERPAY 51512900000 96/06/29-0035 MOERBE, KEVIN W. E MCKINNEY N47 4.06 OVERPAY 02158700000 95/07/0t-0029 NEBLETT, JAMES M W OAK ST' 232.31 OVERPAY 02401800000 95/07/08-0007 ROCHA.'LE08ARO0 N CRAWFORD ST 76,i8 OVERPAY 51410400000 95/07/08-0017 DIMARTIO,'DOUGLAS TEASLEY'0256 L 0.03 OVERPAY ; 03440600000 95/07/23-0012 SICKLEY. N ALEX SPENCER RD" 0.01 OVERPAY 03532000000 95/07/29-0022 EAGLE-PICHER IND INC I-35W 0.01 OVERPAY 03130100000 95/08/20-0006 GALE, JOHN L SUNNYDALE LN 0.80 OVERPAY 9C133100000 95/08/20-0019 RAMA THAI CHINESE CUISINE AVE C 36,26 OVERPAY 61303000000 95/08/20-0026 LAWSON,GREG TEASLEY N353 L 0.81 OVERPAY 51506600000 95/OS/24-0016 RAFKIN, WYNELL TEASLEY 0 67 L 40 215 OVERPAY. 51431000000 95/08/29.0030 CLAYTON ESTATES E MCK[NNEV'N28 x06.1{0 OVERPAY 51374100000 95/08/280032 SKARPA, ALAN TEASLEY 0262 1. 1,$1 OVERPAY, 02329400000 96/08/30-0009 JOLLY, LEO M BUCKINGHAM OR tO.31 OVERPAY 0'1731600000 95/08/'11-0013 RIDG!' •rnn~ m E UNIVERSITY Q 0.05 OVE 15 'x03616000000 96/09 04-0009 BERRY, LINDA K E MISSION ST 40. V -PAY TOTAL OF OVERPAYMENTS 21,557.22 0.00 .c a w F L Agenda No. '4dS A'wda Ite pate (0 26 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of STATE law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION i. That the following competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids: BID N13AHM CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 1910 FLOYD GLENN SMITH CONCRETE CONTRACTOR $16,593.95 SECTION . That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, and insurance certificate after notification of the award of the bid. SECTION Iii, That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein. 6 f i i Agenda No, Agenda Item SECTIO.NU. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive ' bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as ar:'-orized herein, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1996. JACK MILLER, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY: Cot TRACf.DOC t DATE: =en ; Item CITY COUNCIL REPORT Date TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Ted Benavides, City Manager SUBJECT: BID #1910 - BELL AVENUE SIDEWALK REPAIR BECOIEMENDATiOr1: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder, Floyd Glenn I Smith Concrete Contractor, in the amount of 516,593.95. SUMMARY• This bid is for the removal and replacement of approximately one block (190 sq. yds.) of sidewalk from Withers Street to Texas Street with a small portion on Texas Street. The bid includes sidewalk, curb cuts, hydromulch, unclassified excavation and other related activities. BACKGROUND, Tabulation Sheet PRO[:RAMC DF~gTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTE& City of Denton Engineering Department, Citizens of Denton, Property owners and residents in the area. FISCAL NWAL - This project is Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded Account #219-OSA-CDAH-8502. Respectfully submitted: Ted $ avides City Manager Ap ved: J Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 744.AGENDA fill) x 19In BIDNAME BELL AVENUESIDEWALK FIAYD DBR TIIATEN GLENN CONSTRUCTION BUILDING OPEN DATE MAY 30,1996 SMITH INC. & MAINT. i DESCRIPTION -VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR _ VENDOR TOTAL BID PRICE S16,S93.96 S29,"IAO NO BID _ ADDENDUM I YES YES BID BOND YES YES I ~I o d ~ ,2 s •n 'a n v I .f d h i i i i ' E j j t ,:f w ti r Agmda Ne,-2 J Agenda Item ORDINANCE NO. Dale„ AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW 0MMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 252.022 of the Local Government Code provides that procurement of items that are only available from one source, including: items that are only available from one source because of patents, copyrights, secret processes or natural monopolies; films, gas, water and other utility Purchases; captive replacement parts or components for equipment; and library materials for a public library that are available only from the persons holding exclusive distribution rights to the materials; need not be submitted to competitive bids; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to vrocure one or more of the items mentioned in the above paragraph; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SEC]ION-1. That the following psrhases of materials, equipment or supplies, as described in the "Purchase Orders" attached hereto, are hereby approved: PURCHASE ORDERMIMBER YINDOR AMOUNT 65SU DECISION TECHNOLOGY, INC. 534,668.00 65777 IBM CORPORATION S60r84O.00 SEC110N L That the acceptance and approval of the above items shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the quotation for such items until such person shall comply with all requirements specified by the Purchasing Department. SECTtnN 111, That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any contracts relating to the items specified in Section I and the expenditure of funds pursuant to said contracts is hereby authorized. MJ3rzj f i r, Agenda N0.36--- Agend3 Item SRCTION 1V, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately u~ approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1996 JACK MILLER, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY: SOLE SOURCE I ( I DATE: JUNE 18, 1996 CITY Q1ANCli REPORT Agenda No, r Agenda ite" _ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Date- FROM: Ted Benavides, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER #65545 - DECISION TECHNOLOGY, INC. RECOMMEMDATIOX* We recommend Purchase Order #65548 to Decision Technology, Inc. be approved in the amount of $34,668.00. SUMMARY: This purchase order is for mainframe and personal computer software licenses. The software licenses from Decision Technology, Inc. allow the mainframe to transfer data by way of 3270 type terminals, DOS-mode PCs or Windows-based PCs and offers an easy-to-use interface enabling reports to be printed at the mainframe or PC level. This software is a sole source acquisition available only from Decision Technology, Inc. and is protected by specific copyrights and patents. Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval. Sole source acquisitions are exempt from the bid process as listed in Texac r ocat Gayernmen at Code Chapter 252 Section 22-7 BACKGRO Purchase Order #65548, Quote from Decision Technology, Inc., Minutes of Data Processing Advisory Board. PROCRAMS~ n~P,~RTMFNTS OR CRO fP AEEECTED Information Services Division and those served by the mainframe computer. • Funds for this purchase will come from the 1995/96 budget account #468- 044-COMP-%47-8521 and 8502. Respectfully submitted: Ted City Manager A ro ved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 741.AOENDA k PURCHASE ORDER NO. 65548 THIS IS A This number must appear on all CONFIRMING ORDER invoices, delivery slips, eases, (IF MARKED) tins., boxes, packing slips and bills. 00 NOT DUPLICATE Req N,x Bid Nc Date: 06 06 96 Pap No. Ol 11 CITY O PURCHASING DIVISION 1901- TERN SONf 1TDEENTON. TEXAS 76201-4354 8`171383-7100 D/FW METRO 817/287-0042 FAX 817/383-7302 'VENDOR NA 45/ DECISION T>SCHWIAGY, Inc. DELIVERY CENTRAL ONLY S11 ADDRESS 4390 OS RT 1 NORTH ADDRESS INFORMATION SERVICES r 601 E. HICKORY PRINCETON NJ 08540 DENTON, TEXAS 76205 VENDOR NO. DSC49002 DELIVERY OWTED 06 18 96 FOS DESTINATION BUYER TS TERMS 001 1.00 SA VENDOR CAT. # N/A MFG NAME 30,668.00 30,668.00 CITY # 20564 NAMPRANO i PC LICENSES 002 1.00 EA VENDOR CAT. # N/A NPG NAME 4,000.00 4,000.00 CITY ID # 57551 TRAINING E e m 9 r' PACE VOTAL: 340668.00 O ~ a° o GRAND ALs 34,668.00 01 468 044 COW 9647 8521 30,668.00 02 468 044 COME, 9647 8502 4,000.00 INSIRUCIIONS; 3. Terms ' Nei 30 oMn•..ro.1.,i,• •nrr.a.l L Sao/ NI 1d Inwics w,th Autligft eoyy. , 4, Shipping Instructions: F.0.6 Destination prepaid N.r.u .m....,• •,•e wa,l plq ry : Acrwhs Payalh ) 5. No federal or state sales lax shall be included 115E mc1(Ihvy SL in prices billed c in9 iv Sion BtMdn, TX 19201-4299 ...:.3 PURCHASING 0 KFF • W li Acenda No.,9,/, Apenda item Date Decision Technology Cost Analysis April Rent 0 PC 64674 51,706 May Rand 0 PC 65690 1,706 June Rent 1,704 Purdw" Prbe 91,520 Apd CrMR (420) CnKM M) June CruM (1(270) ' Tom New Cat 590,606 { Tratnhip Cat $4,000 2 Oaye 0 52.000 per day a I 1 r .9(2.- Agoowa No. Agenda Item Date ~nr 9Co SCHEDULE A Sh t Ddet Sperm Ne: 7308 QII XWW: 4781-91E Groap: 23-29 Op. Sya VS &SSA lttOwwr. CXS DoCidWAmlym $31,900 !1,639 Iateelltte ibr WIG&m - up to 23 copies Te00 390 Sab 40te1 !39,401) !2,049 Lar p tNeeottlrtd 20% -7.880 -410 Lfotossl Fee 'ee $31,320 $1,639 The LiOmm Fie is a one dme chap >md WW= two eats ot'd0eummtsdon eed Wnwom ibr oat ym ftm the Start Data "O" M at>,ti load" a coedit to the LkGm Fee AW NOW FO& made order the Lloeatt e's AotMn atiOa 10 IMU tht DO"= MOW ss Woww 75 % tithe Leal mooth'e M,,,,I Far SOli ottbo prerioee month's teahl Br sad 2slr. aI the uustal !be for the month berate the pueviow month 7 he LesM Fee W Month lacittder maiateosme sod peovidee a pod-up liaaee at the Ond of ft two you Liwasae apew to m the 1.caee he per Maoth ht a period dtww#.(w mamths with the exnepdoa that D~ to Oata 1 dan7 cwleodv year, l ioantee my %Mlbaste prymenot under its mnul Awd ltmdiag li one, As At my time doting the Leaea, Llomse mry d4d i One time peymoat to obtain a paid-op Lioraae IueWMm rate pear Ot wdtttemea0e. The 1JOeuwe Fa "at that time be $31,l201m a credit d $1,000 !hr each mob d Lease paymoft Acmplod: Amptod: Doddon Txh=kW, I= cite at DentaO By. By Name: Name: 75t1e: Titter Ante Date: Pap) d3 r k Prnl Date MINUTES OF DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING OF JUNE 12, 1995 MEMBERS PRESENT: Don Edwards, Rosa Lawton and Renae Seely and Lupe Tavor MEMBERS ABSENT: Bruce Mitchell OTHERS PRESENT: Gary Collins Renae Seely made a motion the minutes of the November 27, 1995 be approved. Rosa Lawton seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. Gary Collins stated that the annual renewal of the IBM operating system software was due. Gary Collins explained that this software was necessary for the IBM 4381 mainframe to operate and no application software such as Payroll, Utility Billing, etc. could function without this software being operational. Gary Collins also explained that this software is proprietary and a single source vendor. Rosa Lawton made a motion the Board recommend the City Council approve the annual maintenance agreement with IBM for maintenance of the operating system software. Lupe Tavor seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that there was a software package available from Decision Technology, that would provide the using departments to download data from any of the mainframe files to spread sheets, databases and documents on their PC's. Gary Collins stated this software was unique in the way it took VSAM and tape files and made them appear as relational databases. Gary Collins indicated during the trial period this software was used to download Waste Water data from the mainframe for analysis in determining the extent of the rebate for February Waste Water billing. Renae Seely made a motion that the Board recommend the City council approve the purchase of this software package from Decision Technology known as Decision Analyzer. Rosa Lawton seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that IBM had introduced a new program that bundled software and hardware. Gary Collins stated under this new program tte City could acquire a new IBM 9221 mainframe and new disks drives for the budgeted costs associated with software and hardware maintenance. Gary Collins explained that this program was a 3 year lease purchase and was based upon annual up front payments. Gary Collins stated that the new mainframe computer s r;d s ~y F r r, Agend, No. a~ Agenda Item , would be 2.3 times faster than the current mainframeDatecomputer ^and the new disks would have an additional 5 gigabytes of disk storage than the current disk drives. Gary Collins indicated that due to the annual up front nature of the payment schedule that the city would have to wait until the beginning of the new fiscal year to enter into this agreement. Lupe Tavor made a motion that the Board recommend the City Council approve a 3 year lease purchase with IBM for a new IBM 9221 mainframe and new 45 gigabyte DASD drives and controllers when the funding became available. Rosa Lawton seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that the City had installed a new release of the Geographic Information System (GIS) software and that the RISC/6000 workstations in the Engineering and Planning Departments were exceptionally slow due to memory size and speed. Additionally, Gary Collins explained that when memory upgrades were priced the costs to acquire faster, larger machines was not significantly more than the memory and processor speed upgrade costs. Gary Collins stated a side benefit of acquiring new workstations for the Engineering and Planning Departments is the old workstations could be used for General Public access to the City's GIS System. It is planned to place one of the old workstations in City Hall West, City Hall and the Service Center for use by the General Public. Gary Collins stated that the funds for these replacements was coming primarily from the 1990 GIS CO Funds. Rosa Lawton made a motion that: the Board recommend the City Council approve the purchase of these new workstations from IBM. Lupe Tavor seconded the motion and it paEses unanimously. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. Af3DiMM M . y F DATE: NNE 18, I Agenda No. -5--- C.iTY CO 1NCII REPORT Agenda ltem Date - TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Ted Benavides, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER # 65777 - IBM CORPORATION RFCO MEND TION: We recommend Purchase Order # 65777 to IBM Corporation be approved in the amount of $60,840.00. SUMMARY! This purchase order is for the annual maintenance agreement for the mainframe software utilized by the Information Services Department. This annual expense includes routine software maintenance, periodic upgrades and requested trouble-shooting. This expenditure will be paid monthly and covers from June, 1996 through May, 1997. Data Processing Advisory Board recommends approval. This software maintenance is only available from IBM. It is protected by specific copyrights and or patents and is exempt from the bid process as indicated in the Texas Iota GoYernmental CQ& Chapter 252, Section 22-7(A). RA KGRO NI)a Purchase Order #65777 to IBM Corporatio i, Quote from IBM Corporation and Data Processing Advisory Board Minutes. PRO . AMC D .PARTMENTS OR GROIZS FFEMM- Information Services Division and all departments serviced by the mainframe computer. FIS .AL IMPACT: Funds for this service will come from 1995/96 budget funds account #100- 044-0080-8521 Licenses. Respectfully submitted: w navldes City Manager Ap roved: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Title: Purchasing Agent 742.COUNCIL PURCHASE ORDER NO: 05777 THIS IS A Xxx lids rwrnber must appear on all CONFIRMING ORDER hwcdces, delivery slips, cases, . (IF MARKED) ctna., boxes, packing slips and bilTs. DO NOT DUPLICATE - Rey Nex Bid Ncx Dale: 06 10 96 Page No. 01 PURCHASING ~ICOTY9 1-8 DEN TEXAS DENTTONN, TEXAS 76201-4354 VENDOR IBM CORPORATION 8171383-7100 DIFW AAETRO 817/267-0042 FAX 817/383-7302 NAME/ DEPT CD4 DELIVERY CONFIRMATION ONLY C11 ADDRESS P.O. BOX 841593 ADDRESS INFORMATION SERVICES DALLAS TX 75284-1593 601 E HICKORY DENTON, TX 76205 VENDOR NO. III49001 DELIVERY OLIOTED O6 17 96 FOB DESTINATION BUYER TS TERMS e 001 60840.00 VENDOR CAT. $ N / A MFG NAME 1.000 60,840.00 CITY # 93921 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE FROM JUNE 1996 THRU MAY 31, 1997 t El _a A v . m P GE TOTAL t 60,840.00 OR ND TOTAL s 60,840.00 01 100 044 0080 8521 60,840.00 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS` 3. Terms - Net 30 lug'- -1ko-44 'p-6144) L W etginal ittrehx with dtlplieele espy.' 4. Shipping instructions' V0.6. Destination prepaid iu-49o .uw.a, -povi,od.l L III! to Accounts Pgalte S. No lederat or state sales tax shall be included 215 E, MtM(heMX 5t in prices billed -Pi •c ng ivs on i JC~y F hiberriviorm BusNnrass huenmss VQljiprjruYl l • LvAftw Agenda No. +..M,.m„ aQ~ !w. 21 E MCKINNNEY P:C~11-0 1606873 pa b 1 DENTON TX 76t?? VICES p 7r I80YbI0-00 TWH G' 5,070.00 +~abq,COrr,tOw~ '6 XT11 10 F:' Z!, 4~Z..6.... rr+~ r..rrr,.~ rr hnWY MIWMME3 r r r.~ r r~rr+r limldrlrulrll+ifolnln+!l+Idd+h+rJI+G6n+lbdnll ` J I PO Box RM CORPORATION - TIN A DALLAS TX175n4-3593 Remittance Coax r,r,qur~ a+ dwae . . (000) 967-7082 12 3336224 1802610 060146 060600060807033 000507000 10 assure prooarcredit please death this portion and return with remittanOa. INVOICE FOR LEASE/RENTAL MACHINES AND /Olt LICENSED PROGRAM CNAROES row mwAwm4L CW0. N1f aMW LOW PPM Tm A/l =AKX NYL. TAX NET A"Uff CPT DATE DATE QK41100 DZiC./X ANIOtMr skrlLMp TAlOIi FUTWOOKINVIlm asst AWIVTAN V$ Pme Vu ' 399 004l6n 06 #Lf% 0ue0/9s sm.06 18$.00 3203 9ro.C re as 9989 c=s"m V2 026 0007009 OWOL76 06/90/!6 1.304.00 1r104.QQ 3401 MAD Grp 21 1A= MC 1227 ow go 29 am= q.0 m 96" V9FJ'X UN4, COW K ° m oomis 06/03/96 06i904-196 6$s.co cr on. cc 0999 o0nro OF 36 aA4= NLc ~a . sn Am VW/AF Varsm a np 062 on) 11 W03ns 06/3" $9o.oo tri $20.00 1097 am or as NNW= "m c 566 V9LMNIR VERSM 6 on 0087032 W01i96 Wmns 162.00 Qo saves MAD or as am= ro.c VWMAST VrTiiM 2 084 008013 "/a%/% 06/9016 $3.00 91.00 14n am go as a" HLC af06 V$1114 CR Vdlom 9 096 @Wei4 Wolf% 04mm" Lte.00 122.00 1173 am amp = emm= ILc INFORMATION SERVICES Pb" 1 6606873 (mm d,r JUNE Ir 1996 J ~aear+N~ 1802610-00 Inrlemstionat Business Machlnss Corporation CONTINUED w F Y, Agenda No. 96 "won is mw"*m m.r Agen6 illft !.w .9 e- CITY OF D[KTON 6606873 Dail 2 D1ENTONTX_N76201-4229 AUG MIlk~ w CORM` AW«jrr 1802610-00 TV" Sr070.0 11 0 AONra CWPWM + ~u~~ w 1 T 1{yn~o nen euYnwnur ~S C r~wr.rQ wr9rr S • ,Eddud+tlMlMt+dnilhlit+hhnltbidu++Itnlnil sz fl kltc N CORe RATION - IM PO RO DALLAS TX 75284-1693 nernttancs Ca: M haM~r W 14Y r: 0800) 967-7882 32 333624 1602b10 060196 060600060807033 a00507000 To assure proper credit please detach this portion and return with remittance. INVOICE FOR LEASE/RENTAL MACHINES AND /OR LICENSED PROGRAM CHARGES T"Weemar 1S1Y! LOS FROM "m APPLm AKA APR. tA% wr AMOUNT MODNlIw" OPT DAIX DATE CHM W 43TMC./R AMOUNT W= NO 'TAM PRATVOEICRpTSGM a160% VWVVSAM %WROIOR a 11167 miels 06/01/96 1016/30/96 149.00 149A0 13016 owCPtoW=MLC 3477 am= me we 20 am PT I= so me Olr 2/ VR PT IM 031 1 o VILAM V3 Oft 0026m 06/01/% OGM.10% 145.00 3Af.00 0604 am ORP 3O am= MIX f73f ACFAW VlMOpM 2 XNA 0OW79 0%/03/96 06/60/96 1603.00 335.00 0306 am Ow 34 On= MLC f73f ACF/NCP VO132OM 2 3019 """a 06/01/96 06130/6 414.00 414.00 41623 w= KZ L3I34QOE 3736 ow PL/i TRAN@ZW us Vl us 0o37oa16 06/03/96 016/50/916 59.00 39.00 4W GA= L=9W f7A6 DOLOW Cum COWLR a Iis vi Cfl OODLA16 10501/96 016130/96 231.00 2x1.00 4111 BAO= I =MW sm MY MINT 3TVCSCI/Vf-OO8 Imo 90ORri9 06/01/96 06/20/% 7160.00 7160.00 C11°"•"+"""' INFORMATION SERVICES All" 2 -.:.,-.:-av 6606873 t~etaaa JUNE It 1996 J Avomr w 1802610.00 Intwrlationai Business MaahineaCorp!oration 7 CONTINUED I a F i N{N.II~YV{{M'YYMI.YY~Iw~W11~.-v A.rY.~YW, O~~ Agenda No- N•'°•1° _ b"0'00"p/ . Agelld!'W _Pw. CITY OF DENTON 6606873 01 • 40 3 215 E MCKINNEY DENTON TX 76201-4229 ` AnovMN„Nw =W60• mmom 1802610-40 TNM 50070.0 a OrO ~i,,'~ C114wwn~nYf~rMr Ad*~" mm lli1CORP111~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIFIIIIIIIIIlllflilil~dl I~l1 ORATION - TNM PO BOX 841593 DALLAS TX 75284-1593 Remittenes Co! c.{4w{oM w1 rt (800) 967-7882 32 3331624 1802610 060196 060600060807033 000507000 to assure proper credit please detach this portion and return with remittance. INVOICE FOR LEASE/RENTAL MACHINES AND /OR LICENSED PROGRAM CHARGES 1YM UNBC11121" f LSE PROM T HM AFPL=ML! APR. TAX Wr AMOIRIT NXIVI11011111111L a" DATE DATT ' 0*m D7IC./x AVOW RXMLCM TAM 4m 11"m LZCfIrf 4M &AS= Litz ILO) S,97O.00 1/070.x0 e RSa119 TO PAYIffT HM R EM= TO TIQO aNOSM NAY HAVE BM MEZ> TO aM I CI VARM mmwm TRUI17 f. TNff aiYOSE EMM M Ts IfLiNAM R TO "111 SOII CIAITOIMt AORNIQR FOR UZOOM PMWAM. "Id 011122M M MAIMM FOR A LISM PROORMI a CWTAI)= ON A OU'PLOVOT AVAa.M X CN 1113"mY. INFORMATION SERVICES 3 ~Kgnarrw 6606613 Wmig.Aff{ JUNE 1 1996 J +IeeewO►w»no0r 1802610-00 International Business Machines Corporation s,o7o.00 F Y, MINUTES OF DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD MEETING OF JUNE 12, 1995 MEMBERS PRESENT: Don Edwards, Rosa Lawton and Renae Seely and Lupe Tavor MEMBERS ABSENT: Bruce Mitchell OTHERS PRESENT: Gary Collins Renae Seely made a motion the minutes of the November 27, 1995 be approved. Rosa Lawton seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. Gary Collins stated that the annual renewal of the IBM operating system software was due. Gary Collins explained that this software was necessary for the IBM 9361 mainframe to operate and no application software such as Payroll, Utility Billing, etc. could function without this software being operational. Gary Collins also explained that this software is proprietary and a single source vendor. Rosa Lawton made a motion the Board recommend the City Council approve the annual maintenance agreement with IBM for maintenance of the operating system software. Lupe Tavor seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that there was a software package available from Decision Technology, that would provide the using departments j to download data from any of the mainframe files to spread sheets, databases and documents on their PC's. Gary Collins stated this software was unique in the way it took VSAM and tape files and made them appear as relational databases. Gary Collins indicated during the trial period this software was used to download waste Water data from the mainframe for analysis in determining the extent of the rebate for February Waste Water billing. Renae Seely made a motion that the Board recommend the City Council approve the purchase of this software package from Decision Technology known as Decision Analyzer. Rosa Lawton seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that IBM had introduced a new program that bundled software and hardware. Gary Collins stated under thin new program the City could acquire a new IBM 9221 mainframe and new disks drives for the budgeted costs associated with software and hardware maintenance. Gary Collins explained that this program was a 3 year lease purchase and was based upon annual up front payments. Gary Collins stated that the new mainframe computer rgda No. ,~~:nda lfem Ca' '9 would be 2.3 times faster than the current mainframe computer and the new disks would have an additional 5 gigabytes of disk storage than the current disk drives. Gary Collins indicated that due to the annual up front nature of the payment schedule that the city would have to wait until the beginning of the new fiscal year to enter into this agreement. Lupe Tavor made a motion that the Board recommend the City Council approve a 3 year lease purchase with IBM for a new IBM 9221 mainframe and new 45 gigabyte DASD drives and controllers when the funding became available. Rosa Lawton seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Gary Collins explained that the City had installed a new release of the Geographic Information System (GIS) software and that the RISC16000 workstations in the Engineering and Planning Departments were exceptionally slow due to memory size and speed. Additionally, Gary Collins explained that when memory upgrades were priced the costs to acquire faster, larger machines was not significantly more than the memory and processor speed upgrade costs. Gary Collins stated a side benefit of acquiring new workstations for the Engineering and Planning Departments is the o City's GIS ld workstations could be used for General Public access to the workstations Sin tCity Hall Westl City Hall and the Service hCenter for use by the General Public. Gary Collins stated that the funds for these replacements was coming primarily from the 1990 GIS CO Funds. Rosa Lawton made a motion that the Board recommend the City Council approve the purchase of these new workstations from IBM. Lupe Tavor seconded the motion and it passes unanimously. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. tivriooozo e P Agenda Item.f Date ~'ITY C'OUN I a~unn~+ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council i FROM: Ted Benavides, City Manager SUBJECT: An Ordinance to Update Article v. Hotel Occupancy Tax RFCOMMFNQ AM The audit staff recommends that the Hotel Occupancy Tax Ordinance be updated to reflect the 1995 State Legislative changes. In addition, staff recommends changing the Local Hotel Occupancy remittance procedures. BACKCR fNh• Hotel Occupancy Tax 1993 and rporated into the City Proposed changes to the conttracttwere recommended in the of the Hotel Occupancy Tax and action was recommended by the Audit Committee. On April 23, 1996,it 1995 the changes were presented to Council for discussion. Council directed Staff to bring an ordinance to them for formal consideration. J - The changes are highlighted on the attached ordinance draft. They cover three major areas: 1) DeJlnulon changes to coincide with State definitions; 2) Remittance procedures that will require monthly or quarterly remittance based on volume; and 3) Changes in exemption criteria to reflect the State legislation. PRQ .RAMC, DEPARTM NTS OR c Accounting spectflcally. Changes will affect Tax, Budget, and f9CA1.1XaAr,T• The updates to the ordinance will reflect State legislative changes. The remittances will allow the Tax Department to monitor and evaluate collections monthly. Monthly collection will enhance the Tax Department's ability to properly reimburse organizations requesting a refund of the Local Hotel Occupancy Tax. Respectfully submitted: J~~ w Ted Ben idroe es Prepared by: City Manager Susan E. Coff Internal Auditor Approv d: l µ ~~Sl Kath u e Executive Director of Finance F:\WPDOC51oR1)\HO^EL*CC, CRD Agenda No. Agenda Item 4__-. . Date. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AMENDING ARTICLE V ENTITLED "HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX" OF THE FINANCE AND TAXATION CHAPTER OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY AMENDING SECTION 20-101 RELATING TO THE DEFINITIONS OF "HOTEL" AND "PERMA- NENT RESIDENT" AND ADDING "REPORTING AND PAYMENT PERIOD"; AMENDING SECTION 10-102 ENTITLED "LEVIED; AMOUNT; EXEMPTIONS" BY AMENDING SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ; AMENDING SECTION 10-103 ENTITLED "COLLEC- TION" BY DELETING SUBSECTION (b) ; AMENDING SECTION 10-104 ENTITLED "QUARTERLY REPORTS" BY REPLACING WITH "REPORTING AND PAYMENT PERIOD"; AMENDING SECTION 10-109 ENTITLED "USE OF REVENUE DERIVED FROM TAX" BY ADDING LANGUAGE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 351.103 OF THE TAX CODE; BY ADDING SECTION 10-110 ENTITLED "CONFLICT OF LAWS"; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That section 10-101 of the code of ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended to change the defini- tions of Hotel and Permanent Resident, and by adding the definition of Reporting and Payment Period to read as follows; all provisions of section 10-101 not specifically changed herein shall remain in full force and effect: Sec. 10-101. Definitions. Hotel means any building in which the public may, for consideration, obtain sleeping accommodations, including a hotel; motel; tourist home, house or court; lodging house; inn; rooming house; or bed and breakfast 1MW tom',4 rust inelt3det? a :tp~cpita1 eanika'ie~s+.W„or nurs~~i~hnm~ dC1^1 t4t"i` Or OthBr ho~stgiticG 1ST $CWiiaE ~l e~~i~ied and opo aced' as t t tt c~~ni aF heigt r ~s iW to atr . a ? iYlltl ~dry` ~nL fS ltilt~nt ' ner.Xcut;on Qi "`,h f@ > alt ~ 1~ 1 k~0~~ ~.''A1~ N~~ c~efi~?iec"t~fJ~~~Gt~dY1~~1iQ03T, ~dCS4~~~n~"~►< u e3d ~#ry ~~the :ihsti£'u~ of ~~J th ' ~rbe ~c~~r, s ~e ti ~►c:ca'mritr a # oz fnx pbraano ! etigaget~ oa ih ca tfor,ilrcx3rm or ac`eiiti"tji at the` irtEittten x:. Permanent resident is asp6reon4ho has';tha ri'ht't6. o ,ua posedea rcinm In a hrtel;fcir,at 400t 3d eais+±!c~uilva da"ye a s long,: as there is do in'terrupticrh ;tsf` paytgetit, for, the p I< oCle„„ 'A person is a permanent resident if he'entere occupancy under a lease, the duration of which is at least 30 consecutive days, or if he has previously occupied the room or space for 30 consecutive days. Reportln^' ~ahd payment, psrfod means. A calendar; tnointh UnUbA the hotel owes eet# thaxt $500 ?fora calendar r'of th',.'`cx s r f Aptnda Mo.JSS? Apend item na.e 1~(a $1,500 fora,calendar quarter'. it the precedi.ngr is true tkte i?otesl,qualifies1: report and pay.bas.ed'An a<quart6xl per~.od -0< SECTION II. That subsection (a) and (b) of section 10-102 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 30-102. Levied; amount; exemptions. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, there is hereby levied a tax of seven (7) percent of the price paid for a room in a hotel on every person who, under a lease, concession, permit, right of access, license, contract or agreement, pays for the use or possession or the right to the use or possession of a room that is in a hotel, coats two dollars ($2.00) or more each day and is ordinarily used for sleeping. The price of a room in a hotel does not include the cost of food served by the hotel and the cost of personal services performed by the hotel for the person except those services related to the cleaning and readying of the room for possession." fs` ad ~a V ~Vi W3A .i ~.s 'w (b) No tax shall be imposed under subsection (a) of this section upon the following persons: (1) A permanent resident; Lf ) Ari I16ffioere> rlo'yae ag¢n ~ ins i;itutiors <4 tarries G S1'3' ~£tukic~ a ~ 1! t~.`➢ Ci~t._ i Y 4VII Ary4xnepkInnI a irM g~r;aere2 aha r~~~at ~~et ;rsti"~,~~`1~ai~; ~azAviled °kt~ pht;t69 zt~~~3 id~niy3ty ~azid ' exe'ailit ~ ata£ue€" a t~se~ ;pergoY►r ie~~ <%1~ 1'eCit~redQ pay tie bayc. Uel,~te' a tai ~hsbdgh= t~?°; SECTION III. That section 10-103 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended by deleting subsection (b) to read as follows; all provisions of section 10-103 not specifically changed herein shall remain in full force and effect: PAGE 2 s Agenda No. 9- 6 ~a Agenda item P.±RZ-6. nate-.[9_ ' _ Sec. 10-103. Collection. [text of general provisions un- changed] (a) (text unchanged) K 11e18~q SECTION IV. That section 10-104 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended by amending section 10- 104 to read as follows: Sec. 10-104. Quarterly Reports. 4A:fa-1t.~~~~hdy/;~y Fa1R~~i ~ S'~►~~ F3 r.iiti~~~ F+~i~BAiWA✓* 4i~. a, t 'w ~m w.ve ~k A ~q s ♦ ~ 'y ~ 3 dt7Ri~ 21901 a w L. t Ilk. Val, 1;ru-.a S arcin r k r N x Nil T~ ~C a' ,GC^' ,..M Y3' . .vim, wa 11 {♦.,oW A ~ly:.I.EJ',~ .,0.. 5 ' ~yez. rvFi-xX. ♦M" 4 X1 r.P. ~ L r a J i Y' i W a^i+ r Y11C~ UDi~ ~1lIN tft3~'{3Q47^xd gV,4~4S1tX t~s,, k, t *0 X tt~i a► t e~~l aEk#~ qc k a rsixtis' SECTION V. That section 10-109 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended by adding a second paragraph to section 10-109 to read as follows; all provisions of section 10-109 not specifically changed herein shall remain in full force and effect: PAGE 3 w Agenda No. _01 - Agenda Item y _~t=D~p-• Date Sec. 1o-log. Use of revenue derived from tax. hter~ d}vd`<rom't~ rcMhal tie xS~~rtds 1 4vW V : Fy 5,.1 . r9`.. Y w s r,. d M 351" o the ' T CODC, cort•pliance with` Chapte3 Sec. 351.103. may, v ~ ,r w r .n r+ ~ a Y r wa u~i..°2cv~.µ~'C~x~.~R~~w! rsr a, a .,aa~r•.«~% . a"lf^. L. Lu riN CK.',.N.•! wH .k. a. .d W'k a x . w aY +9. ..L ~ .La. SECTION VII. That if any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. SECTION VIII. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $1,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION IX. That all provisions of the ordinances of the City of Denton in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed, and all other provisions of the ordinances of the City of Denton, not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION X. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1996. JACK MILLER, MAYOR PAGE 4 h -Ccd~iiJ ~jenda No.3_f _ 03tE ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY: ift~l~0 Q 1 PAO3 5 s J r F r JUN-13-19% 14:39 CITY OF DENTON PLANNING P,83i83 Agenda No. ` Agenda Item_T CITY COQCIL• REPORT FORMAT Date- DATE: June 6, 2996 TO: Tad Benavides, City Manager FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation SUBJECT: Engineering Services Contract Robertson/Bell Cutoff Relief Bypass REATION• Approve the ordinance approving the Engineering services Contract With Binkley and Barfield. ~~SMARX/BACKGROUND: This contract is for $29,600 to provide Engineering Services to prepare construction plans, epecificatio,ns, details, and special provisions for Robertson/P.11 Bypass. This project is in the first year of the 5 year CIP. Use of the consultant provides expertise and is providing a very cost efficient design and set of construction plena. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMMS, OR GROUPS AFFSCTntn: Citizens in the Robertson/Bell area, Engineering and Transportation Department, The Drainage Maintenance Dept., and CIP Program. FISCAL IMPACT The total cost is $29,600. RESPECTFULLY 9UBMJTTED: e &v "es Cit Manager Prepared/Approved by: Q✓ er ar P.M. ect o Engineering s Transportation AEE00767 TOTAL P.03 t a'ry L Agenda No.96L_00e 7_. Agenda It_emXy Date ~o MEMO To: Ted Benavidas, City Manager From: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation. Subject: Engineering Services Contracts Date: June 6, 1996 The first year of the CIP is a short one in that with the bonds sold in May of 1996, there will be only seven months to get the projects started. We are proposing to use the Engineering Firm of Bi .:Jey and Barfield to design and develop construction plans and specifications for the Kerley Street Culvert Replacement and the Bell-Robertson Bypass Culvert. Design of these two projects involves str rctural engineering which is one of the specialities that we do not possess in house. Particularly, the Bell-Robertson Culvert will have to be a direct traffic box culvert due to the shallowness required with a bypass concept versus the standard straight across (under) the railroad tracks. The Kerley Culvert involves looking at two structures including the railroad trestle and developing either one large structure that is more efficient or two separate ones with the railroad structure to be funded if possible now but most likely in the future. We have worked with Fred Balster, P.E. of Binkley and Barfield on some designs for the bridges on Jim Christal Road that needed evaluation and minor reconstruction to keep them open. Mr. Balster is very prompt in that he usually delivered the work before the agreed upon deadlines and the plans were of excellent quality. We recommend that the engineering services contracts be awarded for $16,900 on the Kerley Culvert and for $29,600 on the Bell-Robertson Bypass Culvert. The Bell-Robertson Design will be for both Phases of the Project so that it can potentially be built in conjunction with a large + utility project being designed now. y w C J: \WPW.S\DRD\BE L I f.ULV.ORD • Agenda No. Agenda Item Date ORDINPIICE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND BINKLEY & BARFIELD, INC.; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a contract between the City of Denton and Binkley & Barfield, Inc. for Civil Engineering Services for construction of a relief storm sewer to be built under the overpass at the intersection of Robertson Street and Bell Street. SECTION II, That the City Manager is hereby authorized to expend the funds as specified in the contract. SECTION III, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1996. JACK MILLER, MAYOR { ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY, 1 . , Agenda Nu,_lit :044~- Agenda ltern_. Me CITY OF DENTON ENGINEERENG SERVICES AGREEMENT This agreement is made and entered into by and betwecn the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and BINKLEY & BARFIELD, INC., hereinafter referred to as . "ENGINEER" acting by and through their duly authorized representatives. The terms of this Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the City by its Director of Engineering and Transportation or his designated representative hereinafter referred to as "Director". WITNESSETH; The CITY hereby contracts for the services of ENGINEER to prepare construction plans, specifications, details, and special provisions for, Robertson/Bell Cutoff RQI gf Bypass located In the City of located in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called the "PROJECT" I. EMPLOYMENT OF THE ENGINEER The City agrees to retain the Engineer, and the Engineer agrees to perform professional engineering services in connection with the Project as set forth in the paragraphs following; with diligence and in accordance with the usual professional standards customarily obtained for such services in the State of Texas, and the City agrees to pay, and the Engineer agrees to accept fees as specified in the paragraphs following as full and final compensation for the work accomplished. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of the work is set forth in Exhibit A, attached to and made part of this Contract for all purposes. Deviations from the scope of work may be authorized from time to time by the City by written authorization. III. SCHEDULE OF WORK The Engineer agrees to begin work immediately upon execution of this Contract and to proceed diligently with said work to completion, as described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part of this contract for all purposes. This agreement may be sooner terminated in accordance with the provisions hereof. Time is of the essence in this agreement. The engineer shall make all reasonable efforts to ccmplete the services set forth herein as expeditiously as possible and to meet the schedule of work herein established. IV. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT Payment to the Engineer for services rendered will be made monthly based upon the Engineer's monthly progress report and itemized and certified statements on an invoice form that is acceptable to the City. Monthly statements should include authorized non-salary expenses with supporting itemized invoices and shall be submitted to the City on or about the fifteenth (IS) day of each month. Compensation for the services of the Engineer will be as set forth in Exhibit C, which is attached hereto and made a part of this contract for all purposes. I Agenda No,y% Agend IIEm____ _ Pate l.. . . The itemized and certified statements shall show the total amount earned to the date of submission and the amount due and payable as of the date of the current statement. Final payment of any money due shall be made to the Engineer after satisfactory completion of all services and obligations covered in this contract, including acceptance of design by the City. The final payment does not relieve the Engineer of his responsibility of correcting any errors and/or omissions resulting from his negligence during the design as well as the construction of the project. Nothing contained in this section shall acquire the City to pay for unsatisfactory as . reasonably determined by the Director, or which is not submitted in compliance of the contract, or when the engineer is in default under this contract. V. INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY The City agrees to furnish the information set forth in Exhibit D, attached to and made a part of this Agreement for all purposes, prior to the Engineer's beginning work. Vl. PROGRESS REPORTS The Engineer shall submit monthly progress reports and attend monthly progress meetings scheduled by the City. Each report shall outline work accomplished and special problems or delays encountered on the Project during the previous report period, and the planned work activities and special problems or delays anticipated for the next report period. VII. INSURANCE A. The Engineer agrees to furnish, Engineer's Workman's Compensation in accordance with statutory requirements and Professional and Employer's Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage in amounts satisfactory to the City but not less than $1,000,000 annual aggregate, and agrees that such coverage shall be maintained during the term of this Contract. The Engineer shall be responsible for determining that its subcontractors, where permitted, likewise carry and maintain adequate insurance coverage. B. All such insurance shall be maintained with an insurance company licensed to do business In Texas with a rating of A- or above with Best. The insurance policies shall name the City as an additional insured and contain a provision that such insurance shall not be cancelled or modified without 30 days prior written notice to the City. VIII. LIABILITY The Engineer will and does hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever, including bodily injury, property damages, court costs and reasonable attorney's fees, by reason of injury to third persons oxasioned by any negligent act, error or omission of the Engineer, its agents, employees, or other person for whom the Engineer is legally liable, in rendering or failing to render professlow-1 services with regard to the performance of this Agreement. The Engineer will, at his cost and expense, defend and protect the City against any and all such claims and demands arising olt of the negligent performance of the Engineer, its agents, employees or other persons for whom the Engineer is legally liable, in connection with work performed under this Agreement. 2 4 Ngenda IX. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR In the performance of work or services hereunder, the Engineer shall be deemed an independent contractor not under the direct control and supervision of the City, and any of its employees performing work required hereunder shall be deemed solely employees of the Engineer, or its subcontractors where permitted. X. SUBCONTRACTS In fulfilling its duties pursuant to this Contract, the Engineer may subcontract to individuals, corporations, organizations, governments or governmental subdivisions oragencies, partnerships, associations or other legal entities. Such subcontracts will be entered into only with written approval from the City. Subcontractors are listed in Exhibit E, which is attached to and made part of this contract for all purposes. XI. TRANSFER OF INTEREST Neither the City nor the Engineer may assign or transfer their individual interests in the Contract without the written consent of the other party. The City and the Engineer each binds itself and its successors and assigns to the other party with respect to all covenants of this Contract. Nothing herein is to be construed as creating a personal liability on the part of any officer or agent of the City. XII. AUDITS AND RECORDS At any time during normal business hours and as often as the City may deem necessary, the Engineer shall make available to representatives of the City for examination all of its records with respect to all matters covered by the Contract and will permit representatives of the City to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Contract, for a period of three (3) years from the date of final settlement or for such other or longer period, if any, as is required by applicable statute or lawful requirements. XIII. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY The Engineer shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Engineer shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Employment, upgrading, demotions or transfers, recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoffs or terminations; selection for training, including apprenticeships; and participation in recreational activities. The Engineer agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. The Engineer will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Engineer, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Engineer will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by the Contract so that such provision will be binding upon 3 T Agenda No, 1..,CoOeS_._ Agenda~ Item-"l Oate-!~' 1SA._ each subcontractor, excepting that the foregoing provisions shall not apply to contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. The Engineer shall keep such records and submit such reports concerning the racial and ethnic origin(s) of applicants for employment and employees as the law may require. The Engineer agrees to comply with such rules, regulations or guidelines as may be issued to implement these requirements. XIV. CONTRACT TERMINATION Either parry may terminate this Contract upon giving written notice to the other party at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of termination. In the event of termination, the Engineer shall deliver to the City all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs, etc., prepared by the Engineer under this Contract. The Engineer shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed in accordance with the provisions of this agreement prior to termination. Should the City subsequently contract with a new consultant for continuation of services on the project, the Engineer shall cooperate in providing information. XV. COST ESTIMATES Cost estimates prepared by the Engineer represent its best judgement as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. It is recognized, however, that the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the Contractor's method of determining bid process, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, the Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that bids will not vary from estimates prepared by him. But nothing herein shall relieve the Engineer from diligently using his best efforts to provide an accurate estimate of the probable construction cost of the project. XVI. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All documents, including original drawings, estimates, specifications, field notes and data are and shall remain the property of the City, and the City shall have the right to access and use of all such data related to the project. The Engineer shall have the right to retain copies of all such documents. The Engineer will provide a complete set of reproducible mylars of the completed drawings plus magnetic disks containing the roadway plan and profile drawings on AutoCAD to the City at no additional cost to the City. The City understands and agrees that if it uses these documents on other projects that it does so at its own risk, and the Engineer shall not be liable to the City for any failure of these documents regarding other projects. XVII. SPECIAL PROVISION Tias instrument contains the entire Agreement between the City and the Engineer, except as additionally stated in Exhibits A through E. XVIII. RIGHT-OF-ACCESS The City will furnish right-of-access on the land for the Engineer to perform the required surveys, or other necessary investigations. The Engineer will take reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the land in the performance of such surveys and investigations. The City will explain to land owners that some damage to vegetation may be unavoidable when obtaining access to the site, and in performance of survey activities. 4 Agenda ND. Agenda Item ~)p da Datey L _ 1_(9 XIX. MAILING ADDRESSES All notices and communications under this Contract to be mailed or delivered to the City shall be sent to the address of the City as follows, unless and until the Engineer is otherwise notified. Mr. Jerry Clark, F.E. City of Denton City Hall West 221 North Elm Denton, Texas 76201 All notices and communications under this Contract to be mailed or delivered to the Engineer shall be sent to the address of the Engineer as follows, unless and until the City is otherwise notified: Fred Barer. P.E. HINNY & B RFIRr.fl_ INC_ 12860 Hillgrest Road. Spite 222A Dallas. Texas 75230-1519 Any notices and communications required to be given in writing by one party or the other shall be considered as having been given to the addressee on the date the notice or communication is posted by the sending party. XX. CONTRACT AMENDMENTS The parties hereto, without invalidating this Contract, may alter or amend this Contract upon advance written agreement of the parties. XXI. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES Approval by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of tl:e responsibility and liability of the Engineer, it's employees, associates, agents, and consultants for the accuracy and competency of their designs or other work; nor shall such approval be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for any defect in the design or other work prepared by the Engineer its employees, subcontractors, agents, and consultants. XXII. VENUE Venue of any suit or cause of action under this contract shall lie exclusively in Denton County, Texas. This contract shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. XXIII. NO BENEFITS. Nothing under this Contract shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this contract to anyone other than City and Engineer and the duties and responsibilities undertaken are not for the benefit of any other party. 5 f F r; Agenda No Apenda item Q XXIV. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Engineer shall fully comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws. XXV. CAPTIONS The captions of this contract are for informational purposes only and shall not in any way affect the substantive terms or conditions of this contract. Executed in two (2) counterparts, each of which is deemed to be an original and as of the day and date first written in this contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Denton, Texas, by its duly authorized City Manager and engineer, has executed this Agreement through its duly authorized undersigned officer on the day of .19 CITY: CONTRACTOR: The City of Denton, Texas BINKLEY I INC. BY: BY' City Manager Fred Balster, P.E. Engineer-Manager 1 i I 6 ~r F i Agenda No. ZLP Agenda hem_ r EXHIBIT A Date .4 BASIC SERVICES The scope of services includes civil engineer'rg services for the preparation of construction plans for a relief storm sewer to be built under a railroad overpass at the intersection of Robertson Street and Bell Street. The plans are to be prepared to extend the culvert to the west side of Bell Street. The project would include reconstruction of a portion of Robertson and Bell Street, rechannetizak:on, and relocation of utilities. The goal of the project is to reduce the frequency of flooding at Robertson Street. SPECIAL SERVICES 1. Topographic survey of the site and setting control points for the contractor's surveyor. 2. Easement exhibits (two estimated). 3. Hydraulic modeling. ADDITIONAL SERVICES If additional services are required for the project, the fees will be agreed upon by both parties prior to execution of those services. Fee payment will be by percentage of completion. EXHIBIT B The schedule for completion of the design phase is 120 calendar days. EXHIBIT C BASIC SERVICES LUMP SUM FEES Construction Plans and Bid Documents $ 20,000.00 SPECIAL SERVICES Topographic Survey $ 2,600 00 Hydraulic Modeling 4,000.00 Easement Exhibit ($600 per each) 1200.00 Expenses 1800 00 Total $ 29,600.00 J} Y F I Agenda No.96 Agenda Item Date EXHIBIT D Items to be furnished by the City: I. Horizontal and vertical control data. 2. As built plans of the existing infrastructure. 3. FEMA flood plain information. 4. Railroad approvals (if required). EXHIBIT E Subcontractor List: IOM, Inc. - Survey Services Morrison Hydrology - Hydraulic Modeling i y JUN-13-1996 14:39 CITY OF DENTON PLANNING n P.02i03_ Agenda No.~[~O„-• Agenda Item CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT Date 6:ZE- Ela - - DATE: June 6, 1996 TO: Ted Benavides, City Manager FROM: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation SUBJECT: Engineering Services Contract - Kerley Street Culvert Replacement RECOMMENDATION: Approve the ordinance approving the Engineering Services Contract with Binkley and Barfield. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: This contract 1a for $16,900 to provide Engineering Services for replacing the Kerley Street Culvert between Scott and Minor Streets. This project is in the first year of the 5 year CIP and we are trying to get these projects underway quickly. Use of the consultant provides needed structural expertise and is providing a very coat efficient design and set of construction plans. PRDaRAMS. DEPARTMENTS. OR GROUPS AFFECTED Citizens in the Kerley Street area, Engineering and Transportation Department, The Drainage Maintenance Dept., and CID Program. FISCAL IMPACT The total cost is $16,900 for the engineering services to develop plans and specifications for the Kerley Street Culvert Project RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: w afs 'v Ci Manager Prepared/Approved by: J C P. S. Di ctor o: nginearing & Transportation AEE00767 k 4 O Agenda H0.~L.s=j1W_ Agenda Item Date t,,-Mr-94 MEMO To: Ted Benavidas, City Manager From: Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation. Subject: Engineering Services Contracts Date: June 6, 1996 The first year of the CiP is a short one in that with the bonds sold in May of 1996, there will be only seven months to get the projects started. We are proposing to use the Engineering Firm of Binkley and Barfield to design and develop construction plans and specifications for the Kerley Street Culvert Replacement and the Bell-Robertson Bypass Culvert. Design of these two projects involves structural engineering which is one of the specialities that we do not possess in house. Particularly, the Bell-Robertson Culvert will have to be a direct traffic box culvert due to the shallowness required with a bypass concept versus the standard straight across (under) the railroad tracks. The Kerley Culvert involves looking at two structures including the railroad trestle and developing either one large structure that is more efficient or two separate ones with the railroad structure to be funded if possible now but most likely in the future. We have worked with Fred Balster, P.E. of Binkley and Barfield on some designs for the bridges on Jim Christal Road that needed evaluation and minor reconstruction to keep them open. Mr. Balster is very prompt in that he usually delivered the work before the agreed upon deadlines and the plans were of excellent quality. We recommend that the engineering services contracts be awarded for $16,900 on the Kerley Culvert and for S29,600 on the Bell-Robertson Bypass Culvert. The Bell-Robertson Design will be for both Phases of the Project so that it can potentially be built in conjunction with a large utility project being designed now. a J:NWPWS%a+DVJ 1wrter.ORo daeada No. ' too) Agend Item Data it a or 6id ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND BINKLEY & BARFIELD, INC.; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a contract between the City of Denton and Binkley & Barfield, Inc. for Civil Engineering Services for replacement of the existing culvert on Kerley Street. SECTION Ii. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to expand the funds as specified in the contract. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1996. JACK MILLER, MAYOR I ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY: I r t Agenda No. Agenda Item Vle_ _ Date " _ CITY OF DENTON ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT This agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Denton, Texas, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and BINKLEY & BARFIELD, INC., hereinafter referred to as "ENGINEER" acting by and through their duly authorized representatives. The terns of this Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the City by its Director of Engineering and Transportation or his designated representative hereinafter referred to as "Director". WITNESSETH: The CITY hereby contracts for the services of ENGINEER to prepare construction plans, specifications, details, and special provisions for: Kerly Street Culvert located in the City of located in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, hereinafter called the "PROJECT" 1. EMPLOYMENT OF THE ENGINEER The City agrees to retain the Engineer, and the Engineer agrees to perform professional engineering services in connection with the Project as set forth in the paragraphs following; with diligence and in accordance with the usual professional standards customarily obtained for such services in the State of Texas, and the City agrees to pay, and the Engineer agrees to accept fees as specified in the paragraphs following as full and final compensation for the work accomplishtd. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of the work is set forth in Exhibit A, attached to and made part of this Contract for all purposes. Deviations from the scope of work may be authorized from time to time by the City by written authorization. III. SCHEDULE OF WORK The Engineer agrees to begin work immediately upon execution of this Contract and to proceed diligently with said work to completion, as described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part of this contract for all purposes. This agreement may be sooner terminated in accordance with the provisions hereof. Time is of the essence in this agreement. The engineer shall make all reasonable efforts to complete the services set forth herein as expeditiously as possible and to meet the schedule of work herein established. IV. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT Payment to the Engineer for services rendered will be made monthly based upon the Engineer's monthly progress report and itemized and certified statements on an invoice form that is acceptable to the City. Monthly statements should include authorized non-salary expenses with supporting itemized invoices and shall be submitted to the City on or about the fifteenth (15) day of each month. Compensation for the services of the Engineer will be as set forth in Exhibit C, which is attached hereto and made a part of this contract for all purposes. l AgEAa No. 7L J Agend Item Date The itemized and certified statements shall show the total amount a rned to the date of submission and the amount due and payable as of the date of the current statement. Final payment of any money due shall be made to the Engineer after satisfactory completion of all services and obligations covered in this contract, including acceptance of design by the City. The final payment does not relieve the Engineer of his responsibility of correcting any errors and/or omissions resulting from his negligence during the design as well as the construction of the project. Nothing contained in this section shall require the City to pay for unsatisfactory, as reasonably determined by the Director, or which is not submitted in compliance of the contract, or when the engineer is in default under this contract. V. INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY The City agrees to furnish the information set forth in Exhibit D, attached to and made a part of this Agreement for all purposes, prior to the Engineer's beginning work. VI. PROGRESS REPORTS The Engineer shall submit monthly progress reports and attend monthly progress meetings scheduled by the City. Each report shall outline work accomplished and special problems or delays encountered on the Project during the previous report period, and the planned work activities and special problems or delays anticipated for the next report period. VII. INSURANCE A. The Engineer agrees to furnish, Engineer's Workman's Compensation in accordance with statutory requirements and Professional and Employer's Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage in amounts satisfactory to the City but not less than $1,000,000 annual aggregate, and agrees that such coverage shall be maintained during the term of this Contract. The Engineer shall be responsible for determining that its subcontractors, where permitted, likewise carry and maintain adequate insurance coverage. B. All such insurance shall be maintained with an insurance company licensed to do business in Texas with a rating of A- or above with Best. The insurance policies shall name the City as an additional insured and contain a provision that such insurance shall not be cancelled or modified without 30 days prior written notice to the City. Vlll. LIABILITY The Engineer will and does hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever, including bodily injury, property damages, court costs and reasonable attorney's fees, by reason of injury to third persons occasioned by any negligent act, error or omission of the Engineer, its agents, employees, or other person for whom the Engineer is legally liable, in rendering or failing to render professional services with regard to the performance of this Agreement. The Engineer will, at his cost and expense, defend and protect the City against any and all such claims and demands arising out of the negligent performance of the Engineer, its agents, employees or other persons for whom the Engineer is legally liable, in connection with work performed under this Agreement. 2 r' Agenda No. - © _ Agend Item 9 Date l 2(t IX. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR In the performance of work or services hereunder, the Engineer shall be deemed an independent contractor not under the direct control and supervision of the City, and any of its employees performing work required hereunder shall be deemed solely employees of the Engineer, or its subcontractors where permitted. X. SUBCONTRACTS In fulfilling its duties pursuant to this Contract, the Engineer may subcontract to individuals, corporations, organizations, governmentsorgovernmental subdivisions or agencies, partnerships, associations or other legal entities. Such subcontracts will be entered into only with written approval from the City. Subcontractors are listed in Exhibit E, which is attached to and made part of this contract for all purposes. XI. TRANSFER OF INTEREST Neither the City nor the Engineer may assign or transfer their individual interests in L)e Contract without the written consent of the other party. The City and the Engineer each binds itself and its successors and assigns to the other party with respect to all covenants of this Contract. Nothing herein is to be construed as creating a personal liability on the part of any officer or agent of the City. X11. AUDITS AND RECORDS At any time during normal business hours and as often as the City may deem necessary, the Engineer shall make available to representatives of the City for examination all of its records with respect to all matters covered by the Contract and will permit representatives of the City to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Contract, for a period of three (3) years from the date of final settlement or for such other or longer period, if any, as is required by applicable statute or lawful requirements. XIII. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY The Engineer shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Engineer shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Employment, upgrading, demotions or transfers, recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoffs or terminations; selection for training, including apprenticeships; and participation in recreational activities. The Engineer agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. The Engineer will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Engineer, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Engineer will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by the Contract so that such provision will be binding upon 3 Agenda Mo.~. Agenda Item Date each subcontractor, excepting that the foregoing provisions shall not apply to contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. The Engineer shall keep such records and submit such reports concerning the racial and ethnic origin(s) of applicants for employment and employees as the law may require. The Engineer agrees to comply with such rules, regulations or guidelines as may be issued to implement these requirements. XIV. CONTRACT TERMINATION Either party may terminate this Contract upon giving written notice to the other party at ]east thirty (30) days prior to the date of termination. In the event of termination, the Engineer shall deliver to the City all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, reports, photographs, etc., prepared by the Engineer under this Contract. The Engineer shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed in accordance with the provisions of this agreement prior to termination. Should the City subsequently contract with a new consultant for continuation of services on the project, the Engineer shall cooperate in providing information. XV. COST ESTIMATES Cost estimates prepared by the Engineer represent its best judgement as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. It is recognized, however, that the Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the Contractor's method of determining bid process, or over competitive bidding or market conditions. Accordingly, the Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that bids will not vary from estimates prepared by him. But nothing herein shall relieve the Engineer from diligently using his best efforts to provide an accurate estimate of the probable construction cost of the project. XVI. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS All documents, including original drawings, estimates, specifications, field notes and data are and shall remain the property of the City, and the City shall have the right to access and use of all such data related to the project. The Engineer shall have the right to retain copies of all such documents. The Engineer will provide a complete set of reproducible mylars of the completed drawings plus magnetic disks containing the roadway plan and profile drawings on AutoCAD to the City at no additional cost to the City. The City understands and agrees that if it uses these documents on other projects, that it does so at its own risk and the Engineer shall not be liable to the City for any failure of these documents regarding other projects. XVII. SPECIAL PROVISION This instrument contains the entire Agreement between the City and the Engineer, except as additionally stated in Exhibits A through E. XVIII. RIGHT-OF-ACCESS The City will furnish right-of-access on the land for the Engineer to perform the required surveys, or other necessary investigations. The Engineer will take reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the land in the performance of such surveys and investigations. The City will explain to land owners that some damage to vegetation may be unavoidable when obtaining access to the site, and in performance of survey activities. 4 1 4 1 r . t i r Agenda ND.- Agenda Item Date_ XIX. MAILING ADDRESSES All notices and communications under this Contract to be mailed or delivered to the City shall be sent to the address of the City as follows, unless and until the Engineer is otherwise notified. Mr. Jerry Clark, P.E. City of Denton City Hall West 221 North Elm Denton, Texas 76201 All notices and communications under this Contract to be mailed or delivered to the Engineer shall be sent to the address of the Engineer as follows, unless and until the City is otherwise notified: Fred Balster. P.E. BINKLEY & BARFIELD, INC. 12860101cres_r Road. Suite 222A Dallas. Ted, 75230-1514 Any notices and communications required to be given in writing by one party or the other shall be considered as having been given to the addressee on the date the notice or communication is posted by the sending party. XX. CONTRACT AMENDMENTS The parties hereto, without invalidating this Contract, may alter or amend this Contract upon advance written agreement of the parties. XXI. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES Approval by the City shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of the Engineer, it's employees, associates, agents, and consultants for the accuracy and competency of their designs or other work; nor shall such approval be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for any defect in the design or other work prepared by the Engineer its employees, subcontractors, agents, and consultants. XXII. VENUE Venue of any suit or cause of action under this contract shall lie exclusively in Denton County, Texas. This contract shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. XXIII. NO BENEFITS. Nothing under this Contract shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in ads contract to anyone other than City and Engineer and the duties and responsibilities undertaken are not for the benefit of any other party. 5 I vv Je~ 4 E Agenda No. J Agenda Item C_" Date " XXIV- COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Engineer shall fully comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws. XXV. CAPTIONS The captions of this contract are for informational purposes only and shall not in any way affect the substantive terms or conditions of this contract. Executed in two (2) counterparts, each of which is deemed to be an original and as of the day and date first written in this contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Denton, Texas, by its duly authorized City Manager and engineer, has executed this Agreement through its duly authorized undersigned officer on the day of -------419. CITY: CONTRACTOR: The City of Denton, Texas BINKLEY 8 BY: BY: City Manager Prod Balster, P.E. Engineer-Manager 6 M s W fj♦ ~+;ienda rva.9~~ Agenda reel n ce: Data. !)fLqA EXHIBIT A BASIC SERVICES The scope of services includes civil engineering services for the preparation of construction plans for the replacement of an existing culvert on Kerly Street and a bike path. The project would include reconstruction of a portion of Kerly Street, channelization, and relocation of utilities. SPECIAL SERVICES Topographic survey of the site and setting control points for the contractor's surveyor. ADDITIONAL SERVICES If additional services are required for the project, the fees will be agreed upon by both parties prior to execution of those services. Fee payment will be by percentage of completion. i EXHIBIT B The schedule for completion of the design is 120 calendar days. EXHIBIT C BASIC SERVICES LUMP SUM FEES Construction Plans and Bid Documents $ 14,000.00 SPECIAL SERVICES Topographic Survey $ 1,500.00 Expenses $ 1.400.00 Total $ 16,900.00 d3 M s E Agenda No. Agenda Ilem jbc Dale 6 sa :I 4. EXHIBIT D Items to be furnished by the City: I. Horizontal and vertical control data. 2. As built plans of the existing infrastructure. 3. Bike path approvals. EXHIBIT E Subcontractor List: 10M, Inc. - Survey Services d M' F Agenda No,.,._ . A'Qenda He g Date- (O-lp-gla CITY CoUNCIL REPORT FORMAT DATE: June 6, 1996 T03 Ted Benavides, City Manager FROMs Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation Skateboards# the all Sidewalkstes, Roller SUBJECTS Prohibition lades i or o operation RECOtetENDATION: Approve the ordinance that would prohibit these devices on all Sidewalks that surround the Square. The Downtown Advisory Board and the Downtown Parking Committee recommend approval. anw aRY /BAQKQAQVND t The Square is located at the top of one of the best hills in Denton for downhill devices. The wide sidewalks also attract users. The square is primarily a place to do business, for tourism, and for the residents of the dwelling units. The devices business owners primarily tare compatible terestediin the prohibition due to nearemisses with their customers. DEPART!ffiNT3 OR GROUPS AFFECTEDt PROGRAMS The Downtown Area Businesses, Governmental Units, and Residents, Engineering and Transportation Dept, Police Department FISCAL I P!! ACTT $2500 for signet and misc. materials. More than 100 signs affected. RESPECTFULLY SUBMJTTEDi i ee~ e nev City Manager Prepared/Approved by: c r r p cto o Engineering & Transportation AEE00767 i Y I I I ` Agenda No. ' Agenda Item Date l o •4e -24- MEMO To: Ted Benavidas, City Manager From:4kerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation. Subjec . Prohibition of Skateboards, etc from Square Area Date: June 6, 1996 This request was initiated by Bill Thomas due to his customers having near misses with skateboards. Bill consulted with Jane Jenkins of the Main Street Office. They then visited with me to get their options. The concept of prohibiting skateboards, roller blades, and like devices from the Square was then placed before the Downtown Advisory Board and the Downtown Parking Committee. Both approved the concept since the Square is primarily a place of business, for tourism, and for the residents. The before mentioned devices are not compatible with those uses. Traffic Safety approved the concept and is recommending it to council. There was some discussion of this being a City wide ordinance. The end result of that discussion was that only neighborhoods who ask for this prohibition should be regulated. The Fry Street Area has shown some interest but has not reached consensus to where the process could be included with this request. i Please advise if you need further, information. F Ac Cnda No. Agenda Item Date _ TSC Minutes May 6th, 1996 page 11 1 i ITEM #6 AN ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT THE USE nF SKATEBOARDS AND ROLLERBLADES ON SIDEWALKS IN THE SQUARE (DOWNTOWN) AREA. Clark presented the request. He said the map needs to be corrected to show Cedar, Pecan, Walnut, and Austin too. That's really what is classified as the Square as described in the backup. The City of Celina and Fredricksburg are the primary cities with ordinances. Celina's ordinance was in 1989 and Fredricksburg was in 1965. Both Denton and Richardson adopted skateboard ordinances in 1966. That's when the first skateboard craze hit. The primary issue here, which is supported by the Denton Downtown Advisory Board and the Denton Parking Committee, is that it's a community thing. These activities conflict with the ability to do business and can inflict harm to potential customers. The main uses on the square are for customers and tourism. Staff recommends passing an ordinance that would limit access. You may eventually get some other requests, possibly the Fry street area. They haven't gone to the level of seeking area wide support. Staff has talked to a person in that area. Staff recommends that TSC go ahead and limit skateboards and rollerblades on the square sidewalks to include the area inside Austin, Cedar, Pecan and Walnut. Devine asked if this would go to City council for an ordinance. Clark said yes. Bill Thomas said he had three reasons for being here. (1) As a merchant (Ethan Allan), he is the one who started this process because of a near accident at his store in January. (2) He is also Chairman of the Downtown Advisory Board and (3) Chairman of the Denton Main Street Program. This is a community effort boiled down to him being here to speak for this ordinance. The concern is for safety of customers and also safety for the skateboarders. There is a lot of plate glass on the buildings. His store is a favorite spot because if you go off West Oak in front of Cris Savino's that's a great place for them to sail out into the street. His horror is one of those skateboarders going through a plate glass window. He would probably be sued by that parent. Also safety for the customers, he had a customer that almost got hit twice within 20 minutes one afternoon. That's what prompted him to start this process and go through the channels. He encourages TSC to strongly think about this ordinance before there is a joint suit between some merchant and the City of Denton will be involved also. Devine asked if this is the only place that has this problem. It seems if there is a problem around the Square there is a potential problem elsewhere. Her thinking is if there is a problem on the Square, Fry street, or any other strip the ordinance should cover all those problems instead of sending different ordinances to the Council. Clark said the reason staff is being cautious about that is cities tend to pass ordinances that cover the whole city. In a lot of places, they don't want that and what staff would rather have AEE0075E ' a r 4 F r AyEAda A9enda Item__" Date! TSC Minutes May 6th, 1996 page 12 is community support. Staff doesn't want to impose something on everybody unless it's wanted. Staff only wants to place government where citizens want government placed. Jane Jenkins, Main Street Manager, echoea Clark's comment that this has gone through several downtown committees. Some of the concerns at the discussion was that they commend kids that are out being recreational and understand that it's a recreational activity. They would rather have them doing that than some other things. The Square in particular is an attractive area for skateboarders as mentioned because of the high curbs and steps. It is a challenging course for them. It's her observation that if people skateboard on sidewalks they have a little less control in stopping and starting than perhaps people on rollerblades. But, rollerblades are being included to try to get safety. Pedestrian traffic has increased considerably downtown. There aren't real wide sidewalks. Some of the customers are tourist and some of them are people who have been shopping the square area a long time. They are frightened when someone comes whizzing by them on a skateboard. She understands staff's concern. They had thought about doing something city wide, but this is an area where the merchants and constituents have come forth. They think its a problem and want to take care of it. She isn't sure the merchants of Fry street think its a problem, but the police officers may. Enforcement is going to be another issue. Traffic enforr.ement, at the Square, has improved considerably. Obviously, someone riding a skateboard down the street isn't going to get a ticket. There has to be somebody there to ticket them. Bill coming out of his store and myself saying "excuse me you aren't suppose to be do that" isn't going to cut it. warThey that, but it will give them caacit to put that they shouldn't be skateboa ding. uClarkk''s going to work with them on signs so they won't be cluttering up the Square with signs. It may be doing something in conjunction with the parking signs. She encourages TSC to approve the ordinance. It would be good for the Square to protect merchants and customers alike. Sawko asked what her feeling was regarding Austin, Pecan, Cedar and Walnut. Jenkins said she is sorry it's not on the map. Those streets form the square and when staff refers to the Square these streets are included as those boundaries. They do form a perfect square. Also if you don't include them, one of the biggest problems is at the corner of Oak and Cedar street. There are some steps there in front of Cris Savino's property where you extend East Oak cut to that back street. It just makes a real clean definition of w:iere the boundaries are for this. Phillips asked if there was a current ordinance for bicycles. Clark said the current ordinance listed as Section 17-11 says that rollerskates, roadway. a It doesn't prohibit that's them from being on the sidewalk. AEE007SE k .~r,Ui7~Jd h0.. Venda Item^ Dale Ca.1 TSC Minutes May 6th, 1996 Page 13 Sawko said his questions was about bicycles. Clark said basically what Chapter 5:51 says from "Texas Criminal Law" is bicycles are treated as vehicles and are not to be upon the sidewalk. It used to be more clearly written. This new code clouded that up a little. Hartsfield said he wonders if this will push skateboarders down in front of Sue's Bride 'N Formal and in front of Bank I. He has seen them a lot of times right in front of Sue's Bride N Formal. He has seen them there 10:00 at night and wonders if the boundaries are too narrow. This will push them just to the edge of the boundaries. Devine asked if that would still fit in with the community groups. Hartsfield asked if it would be defined with block numbers. Clark said you wouldn't be able to do that with the outside. Hartsfield said if you included the 200 block of West Hickory at Bank 1, the parol office, and the George Lambert building. Clark said you could go just 500 feet each side of the intersection, that would be simpler. Several people have been involved in setting block numbers over the years, so it could get confusing. Hartsfield said 500 feet on the outside boundary. Clark said yes, 500 feet from each intersection or whatever TSC decides. Hartsfield said 500 feet from Cedar and Hickory would cover the 200 block West Hickory, Sue's Bride N Formal, and Five Star Supply. Jenkins said skateboarders once skated off the high steps at the Court House, but the people who worked there stopped that. But, a lot of the businesses are not going to be open at night. Sawko said he sees them at night mostly and never in the daytime. Unless you have a police officer out there patrolling, he isn't sure that they are necessarily going to follow a sign. Kids will be kids. Hartsfield said, he is sure if this is passed, the merchants on the Square will keep the police officers busy until they get the message. Devine said if you start passing out $100 fines, it will stop pretty quick. Sawko asked if the signs would make Denton look unfriendly at all. Clark said staff would try to minimize that affect by combining them with other signs. Jenkins agreed. She said they will try to make it as friendly and safe as possible. She will get with Clark to design them. STAFF RECOMMENDED: Approval COMMISSIONERS: Hartsfield made a motion to prohibit the use of skateboards and rollerblades on sidewalks on the square in the downtown area with 500 feet outer limits. Luce second the motion. Phillips asked if rollerblades should be changed to rollerskates. Devine said that's a good point. Can they rollerskate and not rollerblade? Clark said Legal will write that all up. Motion passed unanimously. AEE007SE 1 Y /r J F Agenda No, 9-6 - . Agenda Item Date ~ TSC Memo April 18, 1996 page 7 ITEM #6 AN- ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF SKATEBOARDS AND ROLLERBLADES ON SIDEWALKS IN THE SOUARE (DOWNTOWN) AREA: This request is from the Downtown Advisory Board and the Downtown Parking Committee to consider that skate..boards and rollerblades be prohibited from all sidewalks In the Square Area. A map is attached that describes the area between Cedar and Austin and between Walnut and Pecan. Mr. Bill Thomas, who previously addressed the Commission regarding this, has gained the approval of the two committees that provide citizen leadership to the Square Area. The primary issue is that customers on the Square are being put at risk by the skateboarders and rollerbladers who do not respect the safety of others. Merchants have quoted many near misses and potential accidents from these recreational users of the slopes and large sidewalks on the square. Staff research included the cities of Richardson, Garland, Plano, and University Park as to whether they had ordinances that address this issue. Only Richardson had an ordinance which dates back to 1966, and it keeps skateboards off the street except at intersections to allow safe crossing maneuvers. The City of Denton has an ordinance that also (dated in 1966) prohibits roller skates, skateboards, etc on roadways (Section 18-11). In my discussions with Legal, they feel that a new specific ordinance is needed to address this issue. Staff does not recommend that this ordinance be expanded at this time since there are no formal complaints. Enclosed is a copy of an ordinance from The City of Celina. Staff recommends approval of the proposed ordinance for safety, liability, and functional reasons. The Square is intended to be a place for businesses, residences, and community activities. Recreational use of steep inclines on public streets and sidewalks is not compatible with the previous uses described. AEE006ES I i A~Eff~d 0,_~ , - 0 em 7ti~ WTM EAST ❑AK _a z y:-~+T Y4 EAST HICKORY a rt^a _ `RlT'.TV• -e•6~YlY't'~'r'r.'~~^'f-~T "-i"Y Fw±l i'~T'r~~r:'O~~S~~~~~TI S. tWTJiIX No SKAIMBOARDS ON TIM SQUARE F a F r Agenda Mo.-96- Oa Agenda Item 4q Dale jvk~~ ru ~,;b o 5~~e,a,4 i 10' sc.~ u Q,~.fiv ~a Spa ►.-Ic P~ po w- G CK &6 " 1cl g40 Y F Agenda No.% InA!9 Agenda Item~=_ 76S Transportation Code 1551.103 f CHAPTER 551. OPERATION OF BICYCLES, MOPEDS, AND PLAY VEHICLES SUBCHAPTER A. APPLICATION OF CHAPTER Sown 55I.00f. 110 afreaad. 551.0m Mopd ltc" JR.= so 531.100. fiturrrrd) SUBCHAPTER B. REGULATION OF OPERATION s51.1ot. kfdet sad badaa. Ssl.lo>. Oe.ttalopasnlerG 5SI.105. Operadwa,o.e- o SSI.tOS, Safery aedpmsse SSI.105. amoveddva,ad% a; SUBCHAPTER A. APPLICATION OF CHAPTER ° ISS1.001. Persons affected. ~hii ~ aapplies only to a perm operating a bicyck on: (Added a pub m W& fa the aubuive operation of bicycles. by L 1995, cby. 165111 e0: W1N1) ISS3.001. Mooed ltoelnded. A txovieion of this subdik applicable to a am appifa to o cam than a s provision that by its tuttureeeroot apply to a mopeiA to ddedby L1995, c haA l 11 e . fV1NJ.) 11551.0031o SS1.100. (Reserved) SUBCHAPTER B. REGULATION OF OPERATION 1551.101. Rights and dudes. (a) A person opeeadnt a bicycle has the rithu and dudes applicable to a driver opersti n j s vehicle wider this subdtk, unku: (1) a provision of" chapaer Am a right or dut) , or (Z) a rI& or uuyy appUcabk to a driver operatM It a v&kk cannot by In nstme apply to a person operadn_ ad>rieyck to (bb) A parent: of keldW or a guardian of a word my not knowingly perndt the chile or ward Yf (Added by L 1995. d*.165(1 A Ox 911M) 1SS1.102. General operation. (a) A person hicoperraadag a bicycle "I ride only o0 or uutde a permanent and replar seat attached 10 the (b) A person may not use a bicyck to carry more persons than the bicycle Is designed or aqufppad b arry. (c A person opmdtq a =Is may not use the =k to arty as objett that pm"nu the parson ham operating dsa bicycle with atloss ono lwt6oe the handlebars of the bkyck. (d) A person opsndng a bicycle, coaster, sled, or toy vehicle or wkg roller sken nay rot aaach eider the Of the bicycle, coute sled toy vehicle, at tuner 4*u to a saeetar or vehicle on a (A&MbyL1995, .165(1Aeff. WINS.) 1551.103. Operation on roadway, (a) Eacept u provided by Subseaion (b), a person opendri j a bicycle on. a roadway who is moving slower than the odat traffic on the roWway shall ride as near a practicable to the right curb of edge of the roadway, unless: (1) the person is paasinj another vehick moving In the same direction; w i- F.~ Y~ ~~(d L ~ w r y lJr 1 MY ~ ~ , ~'3~1~; :fit Y~; ,7 fl@ ~ y}~/~~}. ~Lx'►~~ltT~4i r~i.,,(-r ay~l! J I, ~~R1 ~'{j,v • •~`~rl.'Y a: }~'sBtH{•J•!~; Vf t':~. Y~'}4~fi►t~~.~t i'. H h .:r7w. ,i, , J- ~ . ORDINANCE NO.-0- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CELINA, TEXAS, PROHIBITING THE OPERATION OF SPATE130ARDS OR ROLLER SKATES WITRIN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY1 PROHIBITING THE OPERATION OF BICYCLES ON SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES OP CHURCHESf PROVIDING FOR,SEVERASILITY1 PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCES PRO- VIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE AELIEFI PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLI- CATION HEREOF1 AND PROVIDING FOR AN tFFECTIVE DATE BEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the citizens of Celina to prohibit the use of skateboards and roller skates within the public rights of way and the use of bicycles adjacent to commercial establishments and churches to protect the health, safety and welfare of the com- ■unityl NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CELINA, TEXASs SECTION Ii No person shall operate a skateboard, roller skates, or skate scooter, whether manually or self-propelled, within the public rights of way, including streets, county roads, and public sidewalks adjacent to commercial establishments and churches. SECTION M No person shall operate a bicycle on any side- walk or sidewalk area adjacent to any commerical establishment or church. SECTION IIi.t If any section, subsection, paragraph, sen- tence, phrase or clause of this Ordinance shall be declared Invalid for any reason whatsoever, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions of this Ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect, and to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable. SECTION IVi it any person, firm, or corporation violates the terms of this Ordinance, upon conviction therefor, such person, firm, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a minds- meanor and shall be fined a sum not in excess of Two Hundred and No/100 Dollars (5200.00) and assessed court costa as provided by (MS9fbgl/8/901ORD1N3/Skate-3) Agenda No.. Agenda llem Owe lav. These penal provisions shall not prevent an action on behalf of the City of Celina to enjoin any violation or threat- ined violation of the terms of this Ordinano , or an action for mandatory injenction to remove any previous violation hereof. SECTION Vi The caption of this ordinance shall be published one time in a newspaper having general circulation in the City of Celina, and shall bacons effective upon such publication. DULY PA89ED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MMINA, TEXAS, on this the 21r-day of • V U CORRECTLY ZWI-TLDt ti K City secretary i . v✓ YD RUCIZR Mayor 4 V ~•4Y 1i h{,endi tJb.1~Q~ LJO~7 Agenda IteemQQ ` 16 8 DENTON CODE Date e ° Sea 18.8. Validity of inffic-eantrol devices, sips and signal a. h In prosecutions for any traffic offense, the authorized installation and official nature of sil traffic-control devices, signs and signals shall be presumed. (Code 1966, 8 24-89) Sec. 18.9. Riding on portion of vehicle not Intended for passengers. It shall be unlawful for any person to ride on any vehicle upon any portion thereof oot designated or intended for the use of passengers. This section shall not apply to any employee engaged in the necessary discharge of a duty or to persons riding within truck bodies in epeoe I intended for merchandise. (Code 1966, § 24.9) Sea 18.10. Boarding or alighting from moving vehicles. ' It shall be unlawful for any person to board or alight from any vehicle while such vehicle is in motion. (Code 1966, 0 24.11) ' See. 16.11. Use of roller skates, skateboards, eta, on roadway. It shall be unlawful for any person upon a skateboard, roller skates or riding in or by means of any toy vehicle or similar device to go upon any :roadway except while crouinf a street on a crosswalk, and when to crossing such person shall be granted all of the rights sad shall be subject to all of the duties applicable to pedestrians. (Code 1966, 6 24.18) I Sec. M12. Designation of restricted turn. d (a) The traffic engineer is hereby authorized, subject to approval by the city crouna'I determine those intersections at which drivers of vehicles shall not make a right, left or U Wo and shall place proper signs at such intersectional The mating of such turns maybe pd between certain hours of any day and permitted at other hours, in which event the hours be plainly indicated on the signs or they may be removed when such turns are peradsa (b) Whenever authorized signs are erected indicating that no right, left or U two b permitted, no driver of a vehicle shall disobey the directions of such signs. (Code 1966, 124-40) r Secs. 18.13-18.30. Reserved. 1260 1 I F J.\WPDOMORASKATLOAD Agenda No. Agenda Item Date ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ADDING SECTION 18-13 TO CHAPTER 18 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO PROHIBIT THE OPERATION OF SKATEBOARDS, ROLLER SKATES, ROLLER BLADES OR OTHER SIMILAR DEVICES ON ALL SIDEWALKS IN THE AREA SURROUNDING THE CITY SQUARE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Section 18-13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby adopted and shall read as follows: see. 16-13. Skateboarding, roller skating, and roller blading prohibited on sidewalks in designated areas. When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall operate a skateboard, roller skates, roller blades, or other similar device at any time on any sidewalks running adjacent to the streets listed below; (1) On Pecan Street from five hundred (500) feet west of its intersection with Cedar Street to five hundred (500) feet east of its intersection with Austin Street. (2) On Oak Street from five hundred (500) feet west of its intersection with Cedar Street to five hundred (500) feet east of its intersection with Austin Street. (3) On Hickory Street from five hundred (500) feet west of its intersection with Cedar Street to five hundred (500) feet east of its intersection with Austin Street. (4) On Walnut Street from five hundred (500) feet west of its intersection with Cedar Street to five hundred (500) feet east of its intersection with Austin Street. (5) On Cedar Street from five hundred (500) feet north of its intersection with Pecan Street to five hundred (500) feet south of its intersection with Walnut Street. (6) On Elm Street from five hundred (500) feet north of its intersection with Pecan Street to five hundred (500) feet south of its intersection with Walnut Street. (7) On Locust Street from five hundred (500) feet north of its intersection with Pecan Street to five hundred (500) feet south of its intersection with Walnut Street. s I Apenda No.1 - ©as- Apenda Item I Date~"~ (B) On Austin Street from five hundred (500) feet north of its intersection with Pecan Street to five hundred (500) feet south of its intersection with walnut Street. SECTION 11, That if any provisions of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. SECTION III. That all provisions of the ordinances of the City of Denton in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed, and all other provisions of the ordinances of the City of Denton, not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION IV. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not to exceed two hundred dollars. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within (10) days of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the _ day of , 1996. JACK MILLER, MAYOR 1 ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY: , I Y f _ `41} T, ~~~~r< Nd, *4'0~ h ands Item 6 40 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT DATES June 4,1996 TOs Ted Benavides, City Manager FROMS Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation SUBJECT: School Zone for Immaculate Conception Catholic Church School B&COMMENDATIONs Approve ordinance for the school zone. Staff feels the Traffic Safety Commission has clearly defined the difference between a school and day care when they considered this item. This school's scheduled growth could soon reach that of the Selwyn and Liberty Christian schools. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The school fronts on Bolivar. There is significant pass by traffic that is running between Carroll and Elm and Locust using Crescent and Second Streets. The 85th percentile speeds were around 36 mph which is well over the speed limit of 30 mph. The school site is well designed with the building set back and access of the back alley, but the concerns are the potential accidents on the perimeters and to pedestrians. This is a new school that just started operation. Current enrollment is at 100 students, but staff received additional growth projections at the meeting implying major expansions in the near future. PROOR,MS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEDs Parents and students of Immaculate Conception Catholic Church$ Engineering and Transportation Dept., Police Dept., and the general neighborhood on Bolivar FISCAL "12ACTs $500 for signs, paint, and misc. materials RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: 'led nes •r~-`\ Cit Manager Prepared/Aplprno_ved' by: qor,ly ar , ct r Engineering 6 Transportation AEE00767 1 K t. Agenda No. Agend Item Date MEMO To: Ted Benavidas, City Manager From. Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation Subject: School Zone-Immaculate Conception School Date: June 4, 1996 The evaluation for this school zone has gone through an evolution due to the stages of new growth that the school is in. The enrollment this past year was about 100 students. The actual traffic impacts on Bolivar Street were not significant. Backup and minutes from Traffic Safety shows the studies that we did for volumes, speeds, school faculty, and pedestrians. Our first concern was that the size of this school was such that the impacts were not really noticeable now. The site is well designed so that loading and unloading before and after school were not dangerous. An alley serves the back entrances and the parking lot provides excellent separation from Bolivar Street for the parents and children. At the Traffic Safety Meeting, the administrators and parents quoted figures for rapid projected growth which would get them into the size that Selwyn and Liberty Christian are . Both of those school have a measurable impact on the adjoining streets ( US 380 and Bonnie Brae). The Traffic Safety Commission was very clear that they see this school as equal and equivalent to the other two private schools. They also provided some support that day care centers not receive school zones. The reasoning for that is that school zones need to be unique and justified by impacts so that the motorists who must obey the school zone regulations can clearly see the need. Motorists in the last ten years have begun to flagrantly violate regulations that they do feet are reasonable and necessary. That makes them less likely to follow school zones at the Denton Independent School District sites where the impacts are even heavier thap at the private schools. Staff recommends that the school zone be approved based on Traffic Safety clearly making distinction as to the classification of this school and protecting the environment that school zones provide when placed in warranted locations. :s , f. Agenda No. 6 Agenda 11cm TSC Minutes May 6th, 1996 page 3 IT_ ~ CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A SCHOOL ZONE ON BOLIVA.R STREET FOR IM%CULA TE Clark presented CONCEPTION CHVRCH• between Third and Second street. It's said new school Theyve done ea good job in providing TSC the data; how many people they have, growth, and times of interest matching those of Selwyn and Liberty Christian schools. Staff has done speed studies. The first one was done on March 18th and the problem with that was it was during Spring Break. It was studied again on April 18th. The volumes are significant, but not more than you would expect for a street like this. The counts from April 18th shows traffic flow, drop offs, and teachers arrival, so there are a lot of detail on that study. It tells you that the 85% percentile northbound was 36 and southbound was 35. That's saying you do have some speeding. The thing you need to be aware of is he didn't take study on people stopping coming in and out. That would affect the study a little. Basically, what they want to control is the pass through traffic. They are assuming that all their drop off and teachers are driving the speed limit. A report is enclosed from Cummings and Pewitt to give some comparison also. Staff's concern with this is that it is a small school. No significant amount of accidents are recorded and speeding is still marginal. Drivers are obviously going over the speed limit, but it's equivalent to a lot of other streets at this time. Staff is concerned about a small school automatically being given a school zone. If that is done, then all the day cares of this size should be given one too and there are a great number of those. It might be that TSC wants to make a clear distinction between schools and daycares. Staff would Devices". It like T that you make an t engineering study and not Control blanket coverages for things that may or may not truly have an effect. This school could eventually get to that stage. The primary movement happening on this street has a negative effect on the school. There is cut through traffic coming from Crescent down to Second street to access Elm and Locust. If from your observation you witnessed it and felt it needs controlling, then you should recommend it. Staff recommends that you not place a school zone here at this time. Devine said she went through this and couldn't find school zones. Is this a Texas state law rather than city ordinance? Clark said no, the city passes it's own city ordinances on school zones. Devine said, so there is no state law that TSC has to worry about. Clark said the basis that staff is using is the "Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices^, you may want to get Cummings input on that AEE007SE 9 f Fl Agenda No. Agenda i(em Dafe _ _ TSC Minutes flay 6th, 1996 page 4 too. This manual tells you what to look for in a school zone. That's not only a state manual but is used nationally. Devine said, so there is not a state law that says schools should have a school zone. Clark said there is not a state law that says there needs to be 500 vehicles before its ok. Staff is using its judgement, there is no documentation or something that says because of this they can't have it. Devine asked if the state differentiates between a school and a daycare in the area of education? The state is responsible for education - right. Clark said yes. Devine asked if the state differentiated between a daycare and an actual school. Clark said he is not aware that they would. He thinks it would be based on the number of vehicles coming in and out. Cummings said there isn't any differentiating. The state would look at the same criteria - both traffic and pedestrian. If there, they would certainly apply them. Devine said where she was hearing concerns is if this school was allowed a school zone for a small school, TSC would then be obligated to allow one for a daycare. She believes the state does differentiate between a school and a daycare. There are definite criterias to qualify for a school. Clark said the state probably does have clear definitions as to what qualifies as a school versus a daycare. Devine said she doesn't believe TSC would be obligated to give a daycare a school zone just because they have little children. Phillips said he can see a difference because a daycare wouldn't have children up to the third grade. The children in the third grade (7 or 8) may be walking home. If that's the case, there is a problem. It's unlike a daycare in that respect. At a daycare, they aren't walking home or anything like that. Clark said the first study showed there wasn't any walkers. The second study shows one walker. Phillips said a school is a school. It seems if it's a school, let them have it. Tim Donahue, a resident of the city of Denton and parent of two children at this school, came forward to address the commission in favor of the request. He said after 12 years in the Marine Corp, he and his wife settled in Denton. They are real happy here. The situation is not static. The school is going to be a minimum up to sixth grade with a possibility of going through 7th and 8th. If you look at this diagram between Third street and where the atrium is going, it is going to have a fence around it. There is always the possibility of a ball going into the street. The children could end up being closer in the street when going after the ball. Although this school is small, hundreds of children go to this school every AEE0075E E t Agenda No.1S~,c? Agenda Ite -0-4 Dale TSC Minutes May 6th, 1996 page 5 week for religious education and they are not being counted. Lastly, the other private schools have no walkers and do have signs. Since the school has opened, he has witnessed one accident involving a Denton Police officer on Bolivar and Crescent. It was right when school was opening at 8:00 a.m., so there is a possibility of that happening. He thinks everyone ought to err on the side of safety. There are a lot of children going to be there - 80 now. He would like to be able to leave tonight knowing that he can go back to the 2, 500 families from the parish rid say the city is supporting their new school. Margaret Zinn, Principal of the school, came forward to speak in favor of the request. She thanked the city for taking time to commission the speed study. The fact that the average speed was 26 mph does show that the average speed is below 30 mph. She asked how many vehicles was above that average and on that note also was it one or two significantly above that? Like Donahue has said she would like to err on the side of safety because it only takes one accident. One other point is that they are not considered a daycare. They have specific guidelines. Their school is preschool through 2nd grade this year. Next year it will be 3rd with a possibility of going onto 6th with 7th and 8th in the future. Gene Herberger, resident at Southridge and also president of the Home and School Association at Immaculate Conception, came forward to address the commission. He agrees with Devine and Phillips. This is a school and doesn't know of another school in Denton that doesn't have traffic control. You have to have traffic control because these loved ones are so unpredictable. You might have walkers today and 12 tomorrow without a leader. He urges TSC to give favorable consideration to the traffic control and appreciates that which they do for them. Tony LaBarbera, resident, business owner, and parent came forward to address the commission. Another new issue for consideration is across the street they are planning on buying homes for the new teachers and nuns who are going to go there. There will possibly be a 7th and 8th grade in the future. Training the people to slow down now, with the minimum of students now, will be crucial for people to slow down. They are putting in a playground and it is not a place for people to be going through at different speeds. He sees several people flying through there. They need safety, protection for their kids, growth, and training for people traveling through there. Sawko said there was an interesting point brought up, are there any other schools that don't have traffic control in Denton? Clark said there are some schools that start at Kindergarten and go up to 2nd grade. Some of the daycares do have that. As far as ABE0075E F `h Agenda NG.~~ ~v~s Ap ada//Ilam-J Le TSC Minutes may 6th, 1996 page 6 Sawko asked if the main concern here was that this will prompt the daycares. Clark said staff wants to be consistent so people will pay attention to them. Staff is concerned if they go all over town, people won't. If they are truly needed based on volume, they should go in. It could be TSC thinks that this is a reasonable volume, staff doesn't think so yet. Sawko asked, what is a reasonable volume? Clark said 500 vehicles per day. You can definitely tell when school is letting out. It is subjective. It could be that they could have 200 kids and meet that. One of the things they have is their site is well designed. They are dropping their people off in back and are also dropping people off in the parking lot. The actual drop off movements are well off the road. Turning into the site is the problem. Staff wasn't aware of the plans across the street and possible grades over there. If TSC feels that's important, it needs to be taken into account. Sawko asked, how many walkers are there? How many children live in the direct area? Zinn said she only knows of one family who walks to school. There are many who live in the surrounding area. Laura LaBarbera, who has a daughter at immaculate Conception, came forward to address the commission. sFeak,itwas our choice oto stop She at a the i grades listening are now. There were a number of children going all the way to the 6th grade. But, because they wanted to start with something financially stable instead of drawing on their credit line, they stopped at 2nd grade. There was probably 10 children per grade up to the sixth grade interested. They had to let those children know they couldn't accept them. They do have a vo',ume and will have a volume of children. There are over 100 children registered to go next year. That is based on last months figures. They are planning seriously to grow. This needs to be something considered. Phillips said the signs ought to be put up. If this is going to be a school, lets start it up and do it right. Hartsfield agreed. H doesn't see artsfield said Liberty Christian has the volume and the zone. He walking to Liberty Christian. o hatgschool Bis small, Selwyn it has anyone 8-90 students. All it takes is one car and a fatality accident. It is not a daycare but a credited school. He wouldn't be in favor of giving a school zone to a daycare. Also the cut-through traffic from Carroll on Crescent to Bolivar to access Elm and Locust is significant. Hobdy said it's inconceivable that there would be a school without a school zone in this town period. Bolivar street is one of those streets in a residential area. If you are traveling Bolivar, you know you should be traveling relatively slow anyway. It's not going to be a big imposition to ask someone to slow down to school zone speed to get past the school. AEE007SE ra Agenda Ha9-~~V_ O'%'J_... Agenda Item TSC Minutes May 6th, 1996 page 7 , Devine said she would be voting in favor also. A school is a school in her opinion. STAFF RECOMMENDED: Denial based on vehicle volumes COMMISSIONERS: Phillips made a motion to approve the school signs for Immaculate Conception school. Sawko second the motion. Phillips, Sawko, Devine, Hartsfield, and Hobdy voted yes. Luce voted no. Motion passed. AEE007SE Y E t, Agenda No,.] Agenda Item TSC Memo Date ~ -2 " (p._ April l8, 1996 page 4 ITEM 43 ONSID R APPROVA) F .A SCROOL ZONE ON BOLIVAR TR Fm FOR IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH This is a request by the principal of the private school located at 1212 Bolivar. Margaret Zinn describes her current enrollment at 90 students per year. She states that the traffic on Bolivar is consistently over the posted 30 mph speed limit. The school will be adding one grade per year, so with the average per grade at 18 students. There are several day cares in the city that have significantly higher enrollments. Dannie Cummings, Cummings and Pewitt Traffic Consultant, has reviewed this zone to gain additional insight and to help us be consistent with other communities. His report is enclosed. His report basically finds no real need for the zone based on existing traffic and still allows for significant growth before the impact would be of enough significance to warrant the zone. The parking lot and the alley are designed such that the primary movements of unloading and loading take place well out of the way of passby traffic. The school has mentioned the playground that is adjacent, but again the protection is for parents to be able to safely deliver and pickup their children and does not cover them during school hours. A fence should be added immediately by the school if they are concerned about children leaving that playground and straying into the street. Our observations to date do not show much activity there. The primary pass through traffic on Bolivar follows the route from Crescent to Second street to access Elm and Locust from Carroll Boulevard. The most recent radar studies showed an 85th percentile of the pass through traffic to be 36 mph in the a.m. peak hour and 33 mph in the p.m. peak hours (see radar studies attached). Again, the highest volumes are in the neighborhood of 130 vph in the morning which Bolivar is easily capable of handling. Staff recommends that the zone not be installed at this time based on our field evaluations and engineering studies of the site. AEE006ES 6 ~i~i1~lL1~►l.Ti7 Agenda No, ~ C _ g da ft^ PLIll ll 12V C, Date ngineering Planning • rveying MEMORANDUM DATE: April 9, 1996 TO: Jerry Clark, P.E. Director of Transportation and Engineering FROM: Dannie Cummings, P.E. Cummings 6t Pewitt, Inc. RE: Immaculate Conception Catholic School School Area Speed Zones At your request we have evaluated the need for school area speed zones on Bolivar Street adjacent to the referenced school. The school speed zones were specifically requested by the school to cover Bolivar between Second and 'T'hird Streets. City staff obtained 126 radar controlled speed observations along Bolivar on March 18, 1996. That data indicated the 85th percentile speed to be approximately 31 mph which is within one mph of the posted speed of 30 mph. As you are aware, speed limits are typically established by using the 85th percentile speed as the prime indicator of what the speed limit should be. The median speed was calculated to be 26 mph. This means that 50% of the 126 observed vehicles were travelling at a speed which is four mph less than the posted speed limit. Observations of the traffic operations along Bolivar on March 19 helped to confirm that the traffic speeds appeared to be reasonable and within the posted speed limit and driving conditions of the area. We did observe a few vehicles that were travelling at what we estimated to be approximately 35 mph. However, it is a well accepted engineering fact that typically 15 percent of motorists will drive beyond the speed that is considered safe and prudent for a particular roadway. When applied to the total 126 vehicles observed on Bolivar, 19 vehicles during that study period could be assumed to exceed the posted 30 mph speed limit. Also, there are no established school crosswalks in the area which suggests that very few, if any, of the students that may walk to school actually cross Bolivar. As you are also aware, the primary reason for the installation of school speed zones is to provide students with s safer crossing environment at established school crosswalks. We collected vehicular and school child pedestrian traffic volume data at the school site on April 3 during the morning school drop off period. That data has been summarized in the table on the following page. As you can see, the volumes are very light with only 131 total vehicles (44 northbound and 87 southbound) counted on Bolivar during the study period. 1475 Richardson Drive ♦ Suite 230 ♦ Rieharrlson, Texas 75080 (214)680.0602 ♦ Fax (214)690.6371 t r; Agenda Nokllf~ Agenda IteDateDuring the one hour study period 24 vehicles exited from Bolivar onto the school's property to drop off children. No drop offs were observed occurring on the street. Also during this time period no school children were observed walking or riding bicycles to school. SCHOOL AREA VOLUMES AM W&6bouad Sant6hoati • Scboo) •Tra#fic; ( ea:. :`~:~::~'~:i:,;;:::::::> ;:;:`',~..},..::,:;.r.'•I,'.:,:'.,17,':,;.r:,J,I,(f,J, l.'•: }:I;J.[II::;:;:~[I ?:rl'}r5 •••,•,'•,•,~l~{,'~: . S...dY.>:..... tilt olt ;ft 1?velkt:.:::: Period l~ofivar:: l~k~iirg<`' ; ........g.._......... 7:15-7:30 9 9 0 0 7:30-7:45 12 19 9 0 7:45 - 8:00 22 36 9 0 8:00-8:15 11 23 6 0 Based on our field observations, analysis of the vehicular speed data on Bolivar, and analysis of the vehicular and pedestrian traffic volumes, it is our opinion that school speed zones are not oecessary at this location at the present time. If you or your staff should have any questions regarding this information, please do not hesitate to contact me. a T f; Agenda No Agend Item Date~-- JmmaaUatE 61onaE#tion &tfiofie -Sefii0of 1212 Bolivar Denton, Tess 76201 _ Tel: (817)381-1155; Fa:: (817)381-1837 @[QU 7 06 February 26, 1996 Revision 2 !V) ' Traffic Safety Commission City of Denton Attn: Jerry Chrk 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 RE: Request for Signs To Whom It May Concern: Immaculate Conception Catholic School would like to request school zone speed limit signs which would ensure the safety of our students on the school grounds. We request two signs be placed on Bolivar St. at the north and south limits of the school noting school zone speed limits for the hours of 7:00 - 9:00 a. m. and 2:00 - 4:00 p.m We have an enrollment of 90 students in grades PreK 3 year olds through second grade for the 1995- 1996 school year. The speed of traffic on Bolivar seems to be consistently in excess of the posted 30 mph residential speed sign. With our projected growth of 1 grade per year, the safety of many students is at risk Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Feel free to contact me if you should have any questions at 381-1155. Sincerely, Margaret ZijW Principal MZ(es dc: Jeff Kruger Enclosure: Map of schol designating placement of signs i w A Agenda No... Agenda Item~~ P CJ X x ate ~_Z S R Z ~ 3 r_~ E- s m m Q n ~ o 0 41. Y tr1 n M -~cn C1'~Onmcn! s A. 3 4 D e F Agenda No. Agenda Item - 60 Mi101i MOAN Tdil= 3PM D a I e wa F LO War ftMo M.P.R. AUTOPM AUTMMOMIL M Cooll. lMMC13 k um AAUT Clrariea la%L" MILL }O~ • Uou No !B i O 4941 Ilk 11% lOL liMM. Ly Rowdor ' ~ ~v~ SPEED ~ ~./~i~ 1~,r..!'.KGC~-~/m/~~~~t.Z`ul+l~G,CG e,~,•7~X/,Cl~l~f-~/~', 1 ~ .e,a..~,,ZJ.~i" ~i4. M, a M/ L i.v,d•-r=p.,t.G~~~.el~s / "r J- Z-44 f I .C.tic.ttsa~ , f Apende No ` Agenea Item E _ "M ~gldt rAMCU SPEm Oate~ Ilea hoar shoot M.P.B. iUft t } NzfttLm ~ MMtI*s A&UT§ Dip". mtbtaa ttoa Uon - 0 S, 10 so NB SyB 7 ~EACC~fk s igt,c~r~~4 P~2~T Q/W z 4 G O v PEpFs71e1An1 1 SpQ -?e, 76 4carl 5d A+~~, .~PEEO 1815/ 1-32 ~!f G~LG ~ 31 t/ENKCES~ +~1 pd4 • 5AP , o2F. )7 71 "~/~~cCEriT,tE 36.27 r Agenda No. r. dOts_ Agenda Item W101t @IDl~ 1jd=U 3FM Date ~1 tLr~ uuy sbees Laoesla 6~1LJ✓~a,e ~k~ ee 3 P`~ 3: cTp ~CSedl M.P.FI, k n= cvmll_ mi"tum lauve feral AOliY1p8~ UDCiS NSS a TOW saes 0208 go N 8 5 S I foau. cue S i 3Q, 5"M O H ~~e.au -ftd 3o MPN ~eeerdee 8 1-32 j I F e J :'.Y`' C!':102C \S 20!JE .ORD ^ Agenda No. Date j Item ter- - Age Date - ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING A SCHOOL SAFETY SPEED ZONE FOR IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC SCHOOL; REDUCING THE MAXIMUM PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT FOR SAID SCHOOL SAFETY SPEED ZONES TO TWENTY (20) MILES PER HOUR DURING CERTAIN HOURS; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00); PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That based upon an public hearing authorized by the provisions of Section 545.357 of the Transportation Code, V.T.C.A., the prima facie speed limit of twenty (20) miles per hour for vehicles is hereby determined and declared to be prima facie reasonable and safe, and such speed limit is hereby fixed for vehicles traveling within the herein described school zones. SECTION II. That the time periods for the reduced speeds for the school zones described below shall be from 7:00 a.m. until 9:00 a.m. and from 2:00 p.m. until 4:00 p.m. on school days. The lo- cation of school zones described below shall be as follows to-wit: Immaculate Conception Catholic School Both directions of Bolivar Street from its intersection with Second Street to its intersection with Third Street. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Denton defining school zones and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION IV. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sen- tence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. F Agenda a. Agenda item _ PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1996. JACK MILLER, !MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 7 1 Agenda Ng. .CITY co A" ADenda Item DATE: Date_ to-/~- 9ti June 1B, 1996 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Ted Benavides, City Manager SUBJECT: Partial Easement Abandonment - Bell Place Addition The Development Review Committee and Planning & Zoning approval. Commission recommends GARY/BR K ROUN The attached plat illustrates the portion of the abandonment. T.M. Stingley, representing Lake CitiesmDentonaCongregationfof Jehovah Witnesses, is requesting the City of Denton abandon a portion of the previously platted utility easement shown, effecting Lot 2R, Block A, of the Bell Place Addition. There is currently a sewer line occupying this easement; however, subsequent replats of the property indicate that this sewer line will only serve Lot 2R. Typically sanitary sewers are not required to be they only serve one tract. The church has changed its original construction plans and are seeking to increase their building footprint. This abandonment would allow them more latitude to locate their building accordingly. There is an existing manhole at the south end of the tract and the City of Denton will preserve a 16'x 16' easement area for maintenance. ~BAMS nEPARTM~TS OR CR01D4 nrrcrm Engineering 6 Transportation Department, Utility Department, Lake Cities Denton Congregation of Jehovah Witnesses r FISCAT. TMPA T: I None Respectfully Su,pmitted: Te Benavides Prepared by: City Manager /1 5i Paul Williamson Engineering Tech II Approved by: Je ry Clar Di a or o Engineering 6 Transportation ccceP3.upd 1 t r aw c7xrs s s . onn Agenda Ha. Apeada Ilem Oate~;~~ e ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PARTIALLY VACATING A CERTAIN UTILITY EASEMENT RECORDED IN THE PLAT RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AT CABINET I, PAGE 1181 AS IT PERTAINS TO LOT 2R, BLOCK A OF THE BELL PLACE ADDITION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton has received a request for the partial abandonment of a certain utility easement; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas reviewed the requested abandonment and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Denton, Texas has deter- mined that the utility easement being partially vacated is no longer needed for public use; and WHEREAS, the fair market value of the utility easement has been determined and received, as required by section 272.001 of the Texas Local Government Code and DENTON, TEX., CODE ch. 2 art. IV. (1991); NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the portion of the utility easement described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and recorded in Cabinet 1, Page 118 of the Plat Records of Denton County, Texas, as it pertains to Lot 2R, Block A of the Bell Place Addition, is permanently vacated and extinguished as a public easement, to the extent described in said exhibit. SECTION Ii. That by reason of such vacation the City of Denton's property interest in the vacated portion of said easement shall, by operation of law, revert to the owner or owners abutting the easement herein abandoned, and the City of Denton releases any and all claims to the use of the vacated portion of said property as a public easement. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immed- iately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1996. JACK MILLER, MAYCR II l Agenda Agenda ilem Date w~ ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY By. j PAGE 2 y { ( Agenda No. i Agenda Item "EXHIBIT A" Date (A . ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the City and County of Denton, State of Texas in the B.B.B. & C.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract Number 185 and being part of Lot 2114 Block A, Bell Place Addition, an addition to the City of Denton, recorded in Cabinet 10 Page 118 of the Plat Records of Denton County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the most northerly northeast corner of said Lot 2R, Block A, same being the southeast corner of a tract abandoned and vacated by the City of Denton, formerly Vine Street right-of-way, by Ordinance 92-023A recorded in Volume 3162, Page 732 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Tens; THENCE North 88° 271401, West along the most northerly north line of said Lot 211 a distance of 23.03 feet to a paint for corner, said point being the centerline of & 16' utility easement as shown on said Bell Place Addition plat; THENCE South 00° 13' 53" West along said centerline a distance of 3.17 feet to a point for corner, THENCE South 370 34' 00" West along said centerline a distance of 65.32 feet to a point for corner, THENCE South 00° 07120" West along the centerline of a 16' utility easement to the south as shown on said Bell Place Addition plat a distance of 13.16 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 370 34' 00 East a distance of 13.16 feet to a point for corner, THENCE South 000 07' 20" West along the east line of said 16' utility to the south a distance of 181.51 feet to a point for corner, said point lying 16' north of and perpendicular to the south line of said Lot 2R; THENCE North 890 19126" West 16' north of and parallel to the south line of said Lot 211 a distance of 16 feet to a point for corner, said point lying on the west line of said 16' utility easement; THENCE North 00° 07'20" East along the west line of said 16' utility easement a distance of 160,46 feet to a point for corner, THENCE North 370 34100 East a distance of 13,16 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 29736 square feet of land. 5.7.% benp6c wpd Agenda No./`O Q Agenda Item Date . rMu C4~ t 00" alAWMW SITE hcr~r+afr AP LOCX T. l?N , l!~ . . w . F i - • NITh'ERS"~TRFfT._._. ~r~a.G y M,/r"~Y ~^Y/.IYA 1'YY-i. ~11.H~ri 10.•10 .n•Y III goo r•.•.yr~ •w Y.C.^'..w^ u i-i': i i. r' \ C. 41Rf .tp07/Ar .Iollool`r..Z.I'`lFirr .r ..`r,. r.....,:'~.~ C. C. DEAL AWIF Y 4,106 of I WK d C 1 • I yy .•I~Y=-rY W w YI-r r. ~r^ u 1~, .w ya. x111 I 7 .MY w Y~~ r'•1' L n. Iwn I 041 L`- h of Intl 0 i Yy[ w' i iY`. i .~^Ii Li: ..i ....•..i. ~s~ } { _ _ ~1♦7 a~~wla 1 f r r.•.~~•w.l r..rrl.^'•Y U. r.r~" 'w• I 1 • . 101 , , ' •L~ ee ,~i' 3]• . .....1.. E fIr M Yaa M • AYYr Y-... r 'a_ r ~Iw w w ! i;: ! M 47 410 ! 710 412 1 Yrrr4,•u••. N oo•oroo• ! /OB •a~ Ts • Yr~, gIoo, of =1 AD I]. 11' P a» wYYr a.r rr •YYYwr ;T'n Low ~ Y rwM M..r.•r .1 Ylw.._. ar. 3/ Y I . =LY YY.Y Y =.M = .1 wl Y a y ~i V IU.11~ r r. r - L/A III OFF` a a a.r / a AYIm. •A 1 00'! 4' 72' M ..3'""....^ ".,.:L r IL,. r 34.0]' ~M ".n. ...C 1 ~S Q / r`YIr •Iwr MI .'M Yr.I .w •~-W _.~•.r L.•.1 googo _AA . w IWO 10 AOAO 9E0'CAIION __a_..__.."..__-....,.. .»►irg~ ~rOr111~ / / _r Y^~r',wrr Y~-ice. ...,.Iwo rr / i E bd~ 0.0941 41cAES 1411 Yl~ I Y.w r.r.yr ~ . A ,tea Ag L 0T 6 ` Yr w r rr r.r. _ _ g t 4,0 FMK ACAEI ICA, r`~• Lr1~ye ^~/nom Ito •1 Y.? _ 1 »K ♦1 I~• / r Y •ra {•141 .1 a a f 7~ ` y ! IF IIVe'D7• ! I'JO. 61• »aL. I for6 " 1 t 1.~. • IY. u M . I I • Ll OF tiCl.tl~l[Z'~.''''I.yyy~ _Y'L'' . 11 •7 : :.Y: +1... [ '1 ! rR .'•Y / } •'~•1„! •r r •.1 61..1 .m Y, r 11 a» as °ir _~1 P LL M 1491'8• [ 75.51' F. 11V/» rtYRS[d-ir>r is rir.w~.. L[ 11 $111-111-41. t 70.50' 1 . L7 1 at 51 n t 55.5a' &A j goo wY. w. 0 7941 A Y r'Lrw• Y Intl. .r Y a L0/ B may/ 3 C 'r..i~ - .r:r V.~~~/~/ LOT 5 t / I - g crcLwEO t c•L.c%J 1 / u•rYe/n e.YwY>wa .i..r. v. Y. :*1~ Yv r;/'I I 3T __JLtt-_ J/ • y - . _ l aF_ _ . - 'Sw.-1 F:. a w.. M / . AY...Ia1Bw6~-.,A•wa1 # ..'~?lir......w~.:; ilr:.i. •N 89.47'00'Y 474.07' n.» / nw~~roLrlrq~/w.,~,w _ I a. o2Y6 en / I awarY r..w~ Irk LOT S lo, a ~~r0 o C) LJE - N rt• • rtun41 l/r AIDS,, METROPLEX ENGINEL41NG CONSULT IqN - YgJYgI LACIMEEPJAG L Tt •MIAG • 7L40 rl AOR A13'h l-LI•Yq / IIL11al Y}M pig W`d w T 1:p - lot 1/41. 14 I.bN - ORR-$ / cwmoM91] 11 T! 6,10 xYwt 5Yw 4,Y-lAU ron• WAN -[--Isms LNL tUC r3c Lor 1R r, Do AL .LA/ O l UnL _ •T- T.i.pnYtLin, 4,M[ utIC1 MOON tntl•c1.Tlal BELL PLACE ADDITION q Ytr>`tIL or JUgtAM'1 WIT 1,1411 LOTS 9A AM ]A. BLOCK A M - 00.0' pe. lfl-A M7LU110 MA) Will A» , OF LPL a. L.. 1 t, L4L Rat. Ll LI CnI Poll ANL'N+ TOM M21 AD Y•Yw LI "I lc pan 1. Ago. L lr6 u. Y.Y. Fn • IIr1 M.•tnt o m0r WAS Do M7 , [t IM[ [.M opts IM Try { • CMty LIn6 L w r n u Ill LOT JR. 1 C.A.N. COO1 k"I, AYflYCT MAKA IN 1.1.• NI101n/ LION • • • 1.1441: ' f r7 Aror ArOY MAIM re". Y.[.- Ytllitt htwt. L r a r r r 1w'.41. '411 no rg0n 1[0411[ ITr J .~Q, _ LOGflPY.IMI 7AAM SCALE 1 DATE JOB M. 0.[.• trtln •941 bM. ~IA'•Ol 9DIt/A`tr4L1 r 1[I1711~iM. IIL:V f 1'. o 1• /'T.{ t• CKOIm. JJt. L BO•. 1e 0111311 so a 0tJ1]B t.[.• cea nluuml LAMl. r(', •.1., 1111 . 1100- ,L rb l~,.It: ~~'~Y'~'' yy L`i.. 7,•J:4y,L. T'[.~I'. ,I'. ~Y',• '/1"4 pArS'Jl L 4r/Xjr /7-4s1-4 1 i tt T' Agenda No. ' 0 ' J^ P&Z Minutes Agenda Item April 241 1996 Date' Page 20 - Mr. Jones: Second. Ms. Russell: Any discussion? All in favor please raise your right hand. Opposed same sign. Approved. (6-0) c. Consider the preliminary and final plats of Lots 1 and 2, Block of Wier Acres Addition. The 4.004-acre site is on the north side of Jim Christal Road, approximately 581 feet east of Masch Branch Road. Mr. Yost: Now that the variances have been recommended to the City Council, we are moomnerding the preliminary and final plats conditioned on the approval of the variances. Mr. Powell: We find that the pn:himinary and final plats of Wier Acres as submitted do not meet the requirements of Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordina;r.es; however, they will if the variances are ranted as recommended. Therefore, 1 move approval of the preliminary and final plats of Wier Acres contingent upon approval of the variances. Mr. Jones: Second. Ms. Russell: Any discussion? All in favor please raise your right hand. Opposed same sign. Approved. (640 73. Consider easement abandonment Lot 2R, Bell Place Addition. Mr. Salmon: Mr. T.M. Stingley, who is mpresroting Lake Cities/Denton congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, is requesting that the city do a partial abandonment of a utility easement on the Bell Place Addition, Lot 2R, Block A. When this property was platted several years ago, apparently there was a sewer line constructed coming up through this easement. 'through various replats, it turned out that this sanitary sewer that was installed Is only going to serve this lot. Typically, sanitary sewers are not required to be public facilities unless they serve more than one property. There is really no need for the existing sanitary sewer in that easement to be a public facility. Originally, the Jehovah's Witness Church was proposing a small building in the corner of the lot, and apparently they have changed their plans. They are proposing to build a somewhat larger building more toward the front of the lot, so they would like to remove a portion of the sewer line and do away with the easement so that it will allow more room for their building. There is an existing manhole at the very south and of the property, and we will be maintaining a sixteen-by-sixteen-foot easement at the very end, which is acceptable to them. Mr. Cochran: t move that we grant a partial easement abandonment of Bell Place Addition, Lot 2R, Block A. Mr. Jones: Second. Ms. Russell: Any discussion? All in favor please rake your right hand. Opposed same sign. Approved. (6-0) ;-r E:\MP000S%0RD\FILL.B0T Apanda No.._._.,J.k__Qa~ Agenda Item 86- Date. d~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON AMENDING SECTION 25-5 "SOLICIT- ING BUSINESS OR CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT THAT PERSONS SOLICITING CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS IN THE PUBLIC STRERTS OR ROAD- WAYS SHALL NOT WALK ON THE MAIN TRAVELLED PORTION OF THE ROADWAY; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Section 25-5.2 "Regulation of Charitable Solicitations" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended to read as follows: See. 25-5.2. Regulatiov of Charitable aolicitations. Notwithstanding any provisions contained in section 25-5 or section 25-5.1 of this code, no person shall engage in the following: (1) No solicitation shall be permitted along primary arterial roadways Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. (2) Solicitation shall be prohibited prior to thirty (30) minutes after sanrise and after thirty (30) minutee prior to sunset of any day, Monday through Saturday, and shall be prohibited at any time on Sunday. (3) No one under the age of fourteen (14) years of age shall solicit along primary arterial roadways. (4) No person shall solicit without wearing a traffic safety vest and displaying a valid permit upon their person. (5) No person shall be exempted from observing all traffic regulations and pedestrian duties. SECTION II. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phraFe or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION III. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when the provisions of this ordinance become effective which are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict only, and all other terms and provisions of such L F r Agenda No.~~ ~ Agend/as item r' 0011,[ 3r T prior ordinances not in conflict with the provisions shall remain in full force and effect. ,NEON IV. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $500.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1996. JACK MILLER, MAYOR ATTESTr JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY: l Y 4 T' } Afen4a No. Agenda Item Date 10 l~ 9~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON AMENDING POLICY NO. 114.01 "SOLICITATION IN CITY FACILITIES" OF THE PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO AUTHORIZE CHARITABLE SOLICITATION BY CITY EMPLOYEES IN UNIFORM AND ON DUTY FOR SOLICITING CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE UNITED WAY AND FOR THE "FILL-THE- BOOT" CAMPAIGN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed it in the public interest to authorize City employees to solicit charitable contributions on duty and in uniform; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I. That Policy No. 114.01 "Solicitation in City Facilities* of the Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual of the City of Denton is hereby amended by adopting the new Policy No. 114.01, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION Ii. That save and except as amended hereby, all the remaining sentences, paragraphs, sections, and clauses of the Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual of the City of Denton shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION III, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day or. , 1996. JACK MILLER, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY: %Wx /Ml Agenda No. ` d,- CITY OF DENTON Agenda cero PAGE I OF ._1 Date r ' • POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTP.ATIVE DIRECTIVE SECTION: REFERENCE NUMBER: GENERAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 114.01 SUBJECT: EFFECTIVE DATE: SOLICITATION BY CITY EMPLOYEES TITLE: REPLACESr SOLICITATION BY CITY EMPLOYEES i POLICY STATEMENT; City offices are for the purpose of conducting City business. To facilitate internal productivity, no employee of the City of Denton may engage in political activity, solicit contributions, sell tickets, or take orders for any cause or function to another City employee or to a member of the general public while on duty or in any public building, including coffee rooms and break rooms, or on any public property owned or controlled by the City of Denton or on any private property or otherwise, except to solicit contributions for the United Way or for the "Fill-the-Boot' Campaigns. Employees soliciting contributions for the United Way or "Fill-the-Boot" Campaigns, cit sucheithercontributifrom a theemployees or off thetCitygeneral facilitiies on duty authorized in uniform solicit in accordance with any restrictions set forth under Section 25-5 "Soliciting Business or Charitable Contributions,, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, or any other applicable laws, rules, or regulations. The City Manager may also grant exceptions to the prohibition against solicitation and other activities hereunder in special circumstances. Exceptions may include collections for employees leaving City employment and employees suffering personal hardships. I• POSTING OF ALL ADVERTISEMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, LEAFLETS AND ITEMS No other non-job related announcement or printed material may be attached to any window, or building owned by the City of Denton unless approved by the City Manager. Announcements and printed material must have the approval of the City Manager to be posed on a City bulletin board. Specific technical job related material must be approved by the division manager. All items posted must have a removal date in the lower right hand corner. The public service bulletin board located In the service bulletiniboard mustxaddhhererto thesguiidelines However by the the lic establi shed users II. DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED ITEMS TO CITY EMPLOYEES Any printed item, i.e., discount coupons, tickets, announcements, etc., to be distributed to City employees must be coordinated with the Director of Human Resources. To obtain approval, a printed item must be City-related business, or HumancResourcesf Deit for City emploees due to The the method ofd t ibuting City. approved materials. g e:\rrwcc~rou\ UM, VOL 4 z i } E:\RPI0C5\RE5\S0LICIT.7 PG' Agenda No. 00 Agenda Item. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON AMENDING POLICY NO. 114.01 "SOLICITATION IN CITY FACILITIES" OF THE PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO AUTHORIZE CHARITABLE SOLICITATION BY CITY EMPLOYEES IN UNIFORM FOR SOLICITING CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE UNITED WAY AND FOR THE "FILL-THE-BOOT" CAMPAIGN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed it in the public interest to authorize City employees to oolicit charitable contributions in uniform; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION I._ That Policy No. 114.01 "Solicitation in City Facilities" of the Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual of the City of Denton is hereby amended by adopting the new Policy No. 114.01, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION II. That save and except as amended hereby, all the remaining sentences, paragraphs, sections, and clauses of the Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual of the City of Denton shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1996. 4 JACK MILLER, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PRODUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY: v i F f I Agenda No. Agenda Itam CITY O F DENTON PAGE1 OF 1 Date / POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE SECTION: REFERENCE NVNBER: GENERAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 114.01 SVBJECTs EFFECTIVE DATE: SOLICITATION SY CITY EMMPLOYESS TITLE: REAWCBS s SOLICITATION BY CITY EMPLOYEES POLICY STATEMENT: City offices are for the purpose of conducting City business. To facilitate internal prodsctivity, no employee of the City of Denton may engage in political activity, solicit contributions, sell tickets, or take orders for any cause or function to another City employee or to a member of the general public while on duty or in any public building, including coffee rooms and break rooms, or on any public property owned or controlled by the City of Denton or on any private property or otherwise, except to solicit contributions for the United way or for the "Fill-the-Boot" Campaigns. Employees soliciting contributions for the United way or "Fill-the-Boot" Campaigns either from other City employees or from the general public are authorized to solicit such contributions either on or off the City facilities in uniform in accordance with any restrictions set forth under Section 25-5 "Solicitiag Business or Charitable Contributions" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of A~r:tcc., or any other applicable laws, rules, or regulations. The City Manager may a,eo grant exceptions to the prohibition against solicitation and other activities hereunder in special circumstances or what may be considered a hardship case. Exceptions may include collections for employees leaving City employment and employees suffering personal hardships. 1. POSTING OF ALL ADVERTISEMENTS, AN,10UNCEMENPS, LEAFLETS AND ITEMS No other non-job related announcement or printed material may be attached to any window, or building owned by the City of Denton unless approved by the City Manager. Anncuncements and printed material must have the approval of the City ' Manager to be posed on a City bulletin board. Specific technical job related material must be approved by the division manager. All items posted must have a removal date in the lower right hand corner. The public service bulletin board located in the Library is exempt from this policy. However, users of the public service bulletin board must adhere to the guidelines established by the Library. II. DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED ITEMS TO CITY EMPLOYEES Any printed item, I.e., discount coupons, tickets, announcements, etc., to be distributed to city employees must be coordinated with the Director of Human Resources. To obtain approval, a printed item :mist be City-related business, or a specific benefit for City employees due to their employment with the City. The Human Resources Department will determine the method of distributing all approved materials. ~ ~"won ~wu ~ wm c:r. rtr i a c. 6:\WPD0CS\RE5\S0LICIT.3 Agenda Na._9~' ~ Acv,,da/Item c~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON AMENDING POLICY NO. 114.01 "SOLICITATION IN CITY FACILITIES" OF THE PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO AUTHORIZE CHARITABLE SOLICITATION BY CITY EMPLOYEES IN UNIFORM; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed it in the public interest to authorize City employees to solicit charitable contributions in uniform; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVE'': SECTION I. That Policy No. 114.01 "Solicitation in City Facilities" of the Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual of the City of Denton is hereby amended by adopting the new Policy No. 114.01, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTIO IT. That save and except as amended hereby, all the remaining sentences, paragraphs, sections, and clauses of the Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual of the City of Denton shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1996. JACK MILLER, MAY0.1 ATTEST; JENNIFER WALTERS# CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY: AW-11 f Agenda No. Agenda IteJ~Q.~~ CITY OF DENTON PAGE 1 OF 1 DateS9_Ll[ POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE SECTION, REFERENCE NUMBER: GENERAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 114.01 SUBJECT, EFFECTIVE DATE; SOLICITATION BY CITY EMPLOYEES i TITLE, REPLACES, SOLICITATION BY CITY EMPLOYEES POLICY STATEMENT: City offices are for the purpose of conducting City business. To facilitate internal productivity, no employee of the city of Denton may engage in political activity, solicit contributions, sell tickets, or take orders for any cause or function to another City employee or to a member of the general public while on duty or in any public building, including coffee rooms and break rooms, or on any public property owned or controlled by the City of Denton or on any private property or otherwise, except to solicit contributions. Employees soliciting contributions either from other City employees or from the general public are authorized to solicit such contributions either on or off the City facilities in uniform, but not on duty, and in accordance with any restrictions set forth under Section 25-5 "Soliciting Business or charitable Contributions" of the Code of ordinances of the city of Denton, or any other applicable laws, rules, or regulations. The City Manager may also grant exceptions to the prohibition against solicitation and other activities hereunder in special circumstances or what may be considered a hardship case. Exceptions may include collections for employees leaving City employment and employees suffering personal hardships. 1. POSTING OF ALL ADVERTISEMENTS, ANNOM!CEMENTS, LEAFLETS AND ITEMS No other non-job related annoancement or pr.'.nted material may be attached to any window, or building owned ny the City of Denton unless approved by the city 4anager. Announcements and - Lrirted material must have the approval of the City Manager to be posed on a City bulletin board. Specific technscai job .related material must be approved by the division manager. All items posted must have a removal date in the lower right hand corner. The public servioe bW.letin board located in the Library is exempt from this policy. However, users of the public service bulletin board must adhere to the guidelines established by the Library. II. DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED ITEMS TO CITY EMPLOYEES Any printed item, i.e., discount coupons, tickets, announcements, etc., to be distributed to City employees must be coordinated with the Director of Human Resources. To obtain approval, a printed item must be city-related business, or a specific benefit for city employees due to their employment with the City. The Human Resources Department will determine the method of distributing all approved materials. ~"►ooc~~noei uoctar. n ~ V Agenda No. G Agenda item CITY OF DENTON PAGE 1 OF 1 D31C _ POLICY/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE SECTION: REFERENCE NIMERt GENERAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 114.01 ' SUBJECT: EFFECTIVE DATE: SOLICITATION BY CITY EMPLOYEES r TITU t RE PLACES : SOLICITATION BY CITY EMPIOYEES POLICY STATEMENT: City offices are for the purpose of conducting city business. To facilitate internal productivity, no employee of the City of Denton may engage in political activity, soli- cit contributions, sell tickets, or take orders for any cause or function to another City employee or to a member of the general public while on duty or in any public build- ing, including coffee rooms and break rooms, or on any public property owned or control- led by the City of Denton or on any private property or otherwise, except to solicit contributions. Employees soliciting contributions either from other city employees or from the general public are authorized to solicit such contributions either on or off the city facilities in uniform and on duty, in accordance with any restrictions set forth under Section 25-5 "Soliciting Business or Charitable Contributions" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, or any other applicable laws, rules, or regulations and subject to the following restrictions: 1. No City employee shall be allowed to solicit charitable contributions on duty for more than 24 hours during one calendar year. 2. No City employee shall be authorized to solicit charitable contributions on duty when it interferes with that employees regular duties or functions. 3. In soliciting charitable contributions on duty, the City employee will comply with all other applicable sections of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton and all other City policies, procedures, and regulations. 4. The City Manager shall have the authority to impose additional restrictions on solicitation of charitable contributions by employees working on duty when he feels it serves the best interest of the City to impose such restrictions. The City Manager may also grant exceptions to the prohibition against solicitation and other activities hereunder in special circumstances or what maybe considered a hardship case. Exceptions may include ccllactions for employees leaving City employment and employees suffering personal hardships. 1. POSTING OF ALL ADVERTISE!WTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, LEAFLETS AND ITEMS No other non-job related announcement or printed material may be attached to any window, or building owned by the City of Denton unless approved by the City Mana- ger. Announcements and printed material must have the approval of the City Mana- ger to be posed on a city bulletin board. Specific technical job related material must be approved by the division manager. All items posted must have a removal date in the lower right hand corner. The public service bulletin board located in the Library is exempt from this policy. However, users of the public service bulletin board must adhere to the guidelines established by the Library. II. DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED ITEMS TO CITY EMPLOYEES Any printed item, i.e., discount coupons, tickets, announcements, etc., to be dis- tributed to City employees must be coordinated with the Director of Human Resour- ces. To obtain approval, a printed item must be City-related business, or a spe- cific benefit for City employees due to their employment with the City. The Human Resources Department will determine the method of distributing all approved materials. 1.\MPDOCS\M IUXIOLICIT. ML{ r F Agenda Agenda item . Date/OdAE::~ C/TYQFDENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING DENTON, TEXAS 76201 • TELEPHONE 817-566-8309 Of lce of the City Secretary MEMORANDUM DATE: June 14, 1996 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM., Jennifer Walters, City Secretary SUBJECT: Board/Commission Appointments The following is a list of current Board/Commission vacancies: Denton Development Policy Committee - Mayor Miller has nominated Juanita Johnson. Keep Denton Beautiful Board - Robert Gentile has resigned. This is a nomination for Council Member Krueger. If you require any further information, please let me know. Je e W ers C Secre ary ACCOOOF4 'Dedicated to Quality Service" .f Y ' F a I Y' Agenda No- Agenda Item Date._ MEMORANDUM To: Betty McKean - Executive Director - MSED From: Tom Klinck - Director of Human Resources Date: Ysy 170 1996 Subject: Civil Service Commissioner - Re-appointment - Dennis Stephens Betty, each year about this time, the City Council appoints boards and commission members. The Civil Service Commission is the only citizen board that is appointed by the City Manager (and confirmed by City Council) 'seo Attachment 1. - 143.006 of Civil Service Law) As you can see from Attachment 2. Civil Service Commissioner Appointment Schedule, Mr. Dennis Stephens is eligible for re- appointment. Dennis was appointed in July, 1993, just after Frank Davila was re-appointed to a 3-year term (Frank resigned after he accepted a new position in Denver, Colorado). Thus, Dennis has just completed the majority of Frank's unexpired term. I am recommending that Dennis be reappointed by the City Manager. Dennis has been a very involved member of the Commission. He has attended the 3-day Civil Service Workshop in Austin twice. He has learned a great deal about the details of the law as well as his role as a Commissioner. As you know, Dennis is the Executive Director of Human Resources for the Denton Independent School District. Thus, he is very familiar with employee matters. He brings to the commission fair, objective, and balanced judgement in dealing with issues that the commission must rule upon. Please let me know if you have a question concerning this. Thank you. j4f Thomas W. linck tkme9628.tk 5/17/96 w 0 e 4 w Agenda No.1 ' S Agend ife n Dale - Attachment 2. - Chapter 143.006 I +i v f a C Agenda No. Agendaa/ I_temG- p' Da rr- 9 leSS~ 4 143.006. Implementation.: Commiaslon (a) On adoption of this chapter. the Fire Fighters' and Police Officers' Civil Service Commission is estab- lished in th municipality. The chief executive of the municipality shall appoint the members of the commis- sion within 60 days after the date this chapter is adopted. Within 30 days after the date the municipal- ity's fast full fiscal year begins after the date of the adoption election, the governing body of the munici- pality shall implement this chapter. (b) The commission consists of t)ure members ap- pointed by the municipality's ch(e:' executive and con- / fumed by the governing body of the municipality. Members serve staggered three-year terms with the term of one member expiring each year. If a vacancy occurs or if an appointee fails to quality within 10 days after the date of appointment, the chief executive shall appoint a person to sere for the remainder of the unexpired term in the same manner as the original appointment. (c) A person appointed to the commission must: (1) be of good moral character; (2) be a United States citizen; (3) be a resident of the municipality who has resided in the municipality for more than three years; (4) be over 25 years of age; and (5) not have held a public office within the pre- ceding three years. (d) In making Initial appointments, the chief exeeu- Uve shall designate one member to serve a oie-year term, one member to serve a two-year term, : nd one member to serve a three-year term. If a municipality has a civil service commission Immediately be.ore this chapter takes effect in that municipality, that civil service commission shall continue as the commission established by this section and shall administer the chit seosice system as prescribed by this chapter. As the terms of the members of the pre%iously existing commission expire, the chief executive shall appoint members as prescribed by this section, if necessary to create staggered terms as prescribed by this sec- tion, the chief executive shall appoint the initial mem- bers. required to he appointed under this chapter, to serve terms of less than three years. I ro±.'s< i E Agenda No. Agenda Item Date Attachment 2. - Civil Service Commissioner Appointment Schedule CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIONER APPOINTMENT SCHEDULE i; ,I COMMISSIONER 2991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Newell Al A2 A3 NEW Stephens • Al A2 A3 i Bates Al A2 A3 NEW + - Serving unexpired term of Frank Davila Al - First term of 3 year term A2 - Second term of 3 year term A3 - Third term of 3 year term o Al ~ o r APP005DI a w r• ,penda Item /DC _ Date_ CIVIL BERVICn coXXjBBIONERB Charldean Newell, Ph.D. - Chairperson UNTO Regents Professor Secretary - Marilyn Wolford 709 Mimosa (H) Denton, TX 76201 565-3264 (0) 387-4768 (H) Original appointment date 02/09/90 Current term expires 05/31/97 Dennis Stephens - Commissioner Denton I-S.D., Personnel 1304 Heather Lane (H) Denton, TX 76201 387-6151 (0) 387-2459 (H) Original appointment date* 07/93 Current term expires 05/31/96 Jana Sates - Vice Chairperson Union Camp, Quality Assurance 2315 Leslie Denton, TX 76205 566-3254 (0) f 382-3178 (H) Original appointment date 06/17/92 Current term expires 05/31/98 *Frank Davila appointed June, 1993 for 3 year term; Dennis Stephens appointed to serve this unexpired term beginning of July, 1993. APP0O898 Y F ti Agenda No, 96 BOARD/COMMISSION NOMINATIONS Agenda Item ~1404 _ 1996-97 Date ep [g -~b ArRPORT ~DpI80~Y BO11RD D.iat CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 7 John Dulemba 1994-96 Miller 3 Don Smith 1994-96 Biles 4 James Jamieson 1994-96 Cott 5 Jim Risser 1994-96 Beasley 7WINAI. SHELTER ]1DpXBORY BOARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION EBt1 0 N I 2 Joella Orr 1994-96 Krueger BOARD OF RDJUS R" D= CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 5 Rebecca King 1994-96 Beasley 3 Bob Hagemann 1994-96 Biles 4 Joe Bendzick 1994-96 Cott 2 Larry Collister 1994-96 Krueger BUILDING CODVt BOARD D= CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 3 James Fykes (ALT) 1994-96 Biles 4 Byron Woods (ALT) 1994-96 Cott 5 Steve Kniatt 1994-96 Beasley 6 (Mary McCain) 1994-96 Brock (Architect) 7 Greg Muirhead 1994-96 Miller CABLE TV ADVISORY Bonn DUT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION T RM CO. UNCIL, 5 Mark Burroughs 1993-96 Beasley 2 Richard Rodean 1993-96 Krueger c Y 4r S~ L r III ¢QNKtTNITY DEVELOPT ADViBOAY COIOI*T yenda No.~ DIST CURRENT MEMBER AOEoda Item _ NOMINATION Oa 5 Dorothy Martinez 1994-96 Beasley 6 Peggy Fox 1994-96 Brock 7 Jean Ellen Rogers 1994-96 Miller 3 Larry Bailey 1994-96 Biles 5 Ann Hatch 1994-96 Beasley DATA PROCEBBINO V*BORY B0~ M CU RENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 2 Rosa Lawton 1994-96 Krueger 3 Bruce Mitchell 1994-96 Hiles 4 Renae Seely 1994-96 Cott ~TO1R1 ADVISORY BO 4n DIET CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION ~,$ji ~QUNCIL 3 Geneva Berg 1994-96 Biles 4 Joanna Deonath 1994-96 Cott 5 Joy Williams 1994-96 Beasley 6 Michael Flanagan 1994-96 Brock 7 Rahna Raney _ 1994-96 Miller ELECTRICAL CODE 80 on DIST CURRENT MEMB R NOMINATION TERM COUN.rr, 3 (John Hardinger) 1994-96 Biles (Master Electrician) 4 Don Fox 1994-96 Cott 1 Robert Hicks (ALT) 1994-96 Young HISTORIC LAND AZ [nnYL7earnv DIST CURB-- RENT M&MM NOMINATION TIM 02= 3 (Kenneth Morgan) 1994-96 Hiles (Real Property Owner 7 Judy Cole 1994-96 Miller 2 Jim Kirkpatrick 1994-96 Krueger t F r, RAN SERVICBB COMMITTEE A9 nnd a a Hem Ited PM CURRENT MEMBER Age NOMINATION ;)e 6 Pat Muro 1994-96 Brock 7 Diana Briggs 1994-96 Miller 2 Kevin Miller 1994-96 Krueger 4 Sandy Kristoferson 1994-96 Cott EEEP DENTON B87117TIrUL BQARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION Imo! COUNCIL 1 Mabel Devereaux 1994-96 Young 6 Gayla Robles 1994-96 Brock 7 Vera Laney 1994-96 Miller 3 Fjola, Jeffries 1994-96 Biles 4 Bill Watson 1994-96 Cott LIBRARY SOM DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION COUNCIL 7 Kjell Johansen 1994-96 Miller 3 Kathy Pole 1994-96 Biles 4 Ema Ruth Russell 1994-96 Cott PARZO AND_ RECREATION BOARD DIST CURRENT MFM4_BER NOMINATION TF,$ COUNCIL 7 Tom Judd 1994-96 Miller 2 Loyce Wilson 1994-96 Krueger PLANNING AND SONINO CONIMIBBION DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 3 Mike Cochran 1994-96 Biles 5 Ellen Schertz 1994-96 Beasley 6 Katie Flemming 1994-96 Brock I t Agenda No. e,% nO2FL PLOWING AND XECHANICAL CODE BOARD Agenda Ate DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION Dag 5 Millard Heath 1994-96 Beasley (Mechanical Contractor) 6 Lee Capps 1994-96 Brock (Layman) 1 (JeYf Peploe) 1994-96 Young (Master Plumber) PUBLIC DTILITIEB BOARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TE COUNCIL 5 Bill Giese 1992-96 Beasley SIGN BOARD OF APPEALS DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 1 Spencer Washington 1994-96 Young 3 Ann Houston (ALT) 1994-96 Biles 7 Mike Wiebe 1994-96 Miller TRAFFIC SAFETY COXXI88I0H T CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION BERM COUNCIL 6 Greg Sawko 1994-96 Brock 1 Kathy Devine 1994-96 Young 2 Derrick Hartsfield 1994-96 Krueger 3 Mark Coomes 1994-96 Biles 4 Larry Luce 1994-96 Cott CIVIL SERVICE CONXI88ION SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION 2 Dennis Stephens 1993-96 City Mgr. D I HOUSING AUTHORITY :,Venda No. CURRENT MEMBER Agenda Item NOMINATION Oa1T~ 1 Tony Soto 1994-96 Mayor 2 Bob Crouch 1994-96 Mayor i s TEA BOARD OP bIUCTORS Ew CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION T~BM 0 Tom Harpool 1994-96 Council i ACCO0128 4 i Agenda No.. Apenda !tern f~ . Date ~ 'AF- 96 CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 215 E WKINNEY • DENTON, TEXAS 76201 (817) 566-8200 • DFW METRO 434.2529 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 13, 1996 TO: Ted Benavides, City Manager FROM: Kathy DuBose, Executive Director of Finance A~l SUBJECT: THE PROPOSED 1996-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Attached is the Proposed 1996-2001 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for your review. City Charter requires that the proposed CIP, as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission, be presented to the City Manager at least 90 days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. Each year the City Council is responsible for approving the first year of the five year CIP. Typically, as each year advances, new projects are recommended for the fifth year only, while projects for the first four years remain unchanged. The first four years of the 1996-2001 CIP represent the recommendation by the 1996 Citizens' Blue Ribbon Committee that was formally approved by the citizens in a bond election fast February. On June 12, 1996 the Planning and Zoning Commission, after holding two separate public hearings regarding the CIP, unanimously recommended that City Council approve the 1996-2001 CIP as proposed. In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission expressed their desire that City Council consider increasing operational funding for drainage maintenance. Please advise if you have any questions. Thank you. JF; of Attachment AFF011FE "Dedicated to Quality Sendce" a' t I i M 1 is 1996-2001 e y CAPI'T'AL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM s Table of Cowenls General Government 1s I I Capital Budgeting Calendar 1 ~s 1996-97 Project Summary 3 1 1997-98 Project Summary 4 1998-99 Project Summary 5 `r 1999-2000 Project Summary 6 I1 2000-2001 Project Summary 7 9 ~I I Other Projects Submitted Other Projects Submitted Summary 17 Utilities Executive Summary 21 191, Electric 29 Water 43 I Wastewater 55 Solid Waste 65 6 Fleet Services 73 6 6 I 6 s r t 1996-97 CIP CALENDAR 1a January 16 - Friday Priori Questionnaire distributed -o City Council. February 13 Tuesday Review and discussion of Budget Priority Qjestionnaire results with City Council. March 7 - Thursday Budget Kick-off (Operating and Capital Improvement Program). March 13 - Wednesday Planning and Zoning Commission briefing of Capital Improvement process March 19 - Tuesday City Council briefing on budget process - 8 Operating & Capital Improvement Program March 27 - Wednesday Planning and Zoning Commissiou and Public Utilities Board hold a joint public hearing to receive input x regarding capital projects. April 5 - Friday Final Draft of Operating budget and capital improvement requests due. April 10 -Wednesday Public Utilities Board receives preliminary draft of Utility Capital Improvement Program April 12 - Friday General Government fifth year capital improvement requests are presented to Executive Committee for consideration. f April IS - Monday Public Utilities Board workaeselon to review Utilities budgets !I April 16 - Tuesday Executive Committee ranking of capital improvement requests due to Budget Office. April 19 - Friday Executive Committee discussion of capital improvement priority proposal. April 24 - Wednesday Executive Committee formulates General Government CIP recommendation to take to Planning and Zoning Commission. May I - Wednesday Public Utilities Board worksession to review Utilities budgets May 15 - Walnesday Public Utilities Board mall approval of Utility budgets - CIP/Operating { May 22 - Wednesday Presentation of Capital Improvement Program to Planning and Zoning Commission (General Government and Utility). June S . Wednesday P,.aning and Zoning Commission holds a public bearing to receive input on 1996-2001 Capital a Improvement Program. E! June 12 - Wednesday Planning and Zoning Commission considers a recommendation to City Council regarding the Capital Improvement Program. June 18 - Tuesday Capital lmprovement Program presented to City Council. I September 17 - Tuesday City Council adopts Capital Improvement Program budget (first year of Capital Improvement Program). }f I ,vwi is i Ea to 4 }r4 F K GENERAL GOVERNMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The Capital Improvement budgeting process began with a joint public hearing held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Public Utilities Board to solicit input from the community. In addition to the public hearing, the City Council completed a budget priority questionnaire. The public hearing, the results of the budget priority questionnaire, and actual need all served as a basis for staff to prepare capital Improvement program requests. Once requests were prepared, they were presented to the City's Executive Committee for consideration. Each project was evaluated based on its impact on: 1. Public Safety, Heaith and Life; 2. Legol Requirement, Liability or Mandate; 3. Quality and Reliability of Current Service Level; 4. Economic Growth and Development; 5. Recreational, Cultural and Aesthetic Value; and 6. Funding Ability. The Executive Committee recommendations were then sent to the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval. Once the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a recommendation based on staff's proposal, the CIP is submitted to the City Council for consideration and approval. The recommended 1998.2001, Five-Year General Government Capital Improvement Plan Is summarized in the following pages. Now guidelines were implemented during the 1991.92 planning process Incorporating projected annual Inflation rates for each project requested for the plan's fifth year. This approach allows a more comprehensive identification of operation and maintenance costs related to each project and a more accurate estimate of future project coats. Those projects recommended for fifth year funding are proposed for 2000-2001. Other projects submitted though not recommended are Included for Informational purposes. 2 . a F r' I i fiiiififr iiiiif~ flffifM (1511! on mm mom omm wom mom Mom mom 6" b11" 1996-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT .,a a AYR70B®riKl 11e0k1111E!>< AD TOTAL OPMAT. uwivtN, bnr.~1 crrvr w' r1a;,ecr °~10 - ottr r Iuum PI6"TNAl1E 6cr~na. 'W1iWUen', uaileug0 • wrs~llsa oonit Doan MAINT. W-W DRAINAGE 061004 ME?" 0 400.000 400000 200.000 500 W-w DRANAOE 0610906 0000 aAMMITAN VAAAGE DRAPNOE 100,000 100.000 100.000 500 M-W DPA04AOE 0'!0!0 CAFPOAA SENTCLUERTUPPOVEhleM 250.000 250.000 250.000 1.000 N -V OAANAOE 0610045 MMC DRAINAGE CANTAL LffWNEMENTS PH 1 125.000 125.000 120.000 W-W PARKS 00=19 UPGRADE ENSTlp PARK? PH I 450.000 mow mo.000 3.000 00-8? PAWS 0OMM ATMETIC PACUITES RENOV A OEV PH I 400.000 400.000 400000 M-w TUNS 0010140 SOUTHEAST DENTON ICMAUM PH 0 ao.m 50.000 50.000 500 M-67 TRAM 0010141 AVENLE O MCC "TON 450.000 200.000 1501000 440.000 I'm M-W TPANY 00101409 PHAK I NOT TOM" CMNOO TOMOAN) BSOA00 590.000 500.000 1.000 W-0 TMNS 00101405 LOOP 4MNPASS-RKIM-OF-WAY PHI 341AW 341 AM 541.000 W - W TMNS 001006 PORT WORTH OR PAVN3 i DMN pHME I L 4 1.400000 0 M BOND MONEY) 1.400A00 4.000.000 5.400.ODO M-6T MANS 001015A 810EWAL041 IVAYSPH1 142A00 142.000 142.000 1.000 w -ow TMNS 0010066 STREET OomaTKICT10N M 1 450.000 450000 450,000 4.000 "-OF TMNS MMS U.S n FRDM LNNEFOrYOWVE TO I -15 1,000000 500000 1.900A00 4.155.000 5.6SSA00 IA00.000 4A90.000 0 500000 6.100A00 8aSSA00 14.484AM 12.500 1 "This rwervie souros inoiudes ow WOatM of oblipalbn, hbnd baianos, and gerwW !und resouross. Lo I ----T-- b f T 1. A 1986-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT AYIIOP01fDfN(, ,c rY ;::~"`s,.°yy"~y~R` ~A~'~.,i~15i ~,..r °z, har .e'` /1y A~~. ;TOTAL. OPFMAT. ~ IAAiN7, UNHWJSD W¢a ~ ad*m 97-0 OPAP" x1910 EAO E 01WF OKAAA l PEVHM WOOLL1 % 946A00 py,COp 046000 97-w DMNAOE 001017 MA90EY STfIET OMNAOE 00,000 90,000 6OA00 600 97-0 ONANAOE 001010 FIETCHEABANCHATHDMMFAME ISO= 190,000 160,000 11000 07-00 OPAhAOE 06IMS MNCHESTATES DRA9NOE-PHASEI 125,000 126,000 126,000 97-16 onAMOM MR= M,9C OPANAW CAPFTAL 61PPDYEMENT9 PH N 126000 126,000 126,000 1,000 07-w PAPM 000110 oOWN7OWM M►PlovD NT6 700.000 700,000 1601000 960,000 97-90 PAAKS ODMI C WOAADE E700T04 PAAKI PH N =OA00 360,000 390,000 3,000 07-16 PARKS 009wl 0~600N OF ML46 AND N LAKES IFC CENTERO 1AD0A00 f A00,0D0 1.000,000 76,000 97-w TPMNS 001074 MAKH BMNCN ROAD PINOE I 1,18TA00 11167,000 1,167,000 n-w TUNIS oo,9w GAME ONRUNWALK 01,000 61,000 61,000 97-00 TPANG oolm KNO9NOWBDEWOA'X .16000 36000 36,000 W-w Tf1AN8 00,010 6DEWAUUN100EWAY8 PH 1 14$000 142,000 142,000 01-91 TMN9 o0low 61KEET 14lo0NSTKUCTION PH N 486000 460,000 460,000 07-10 PAC MOMT o0m 0110 AENOWAT10N PAYE 1 71 &W 719,000 660,000 11296000 179,000 0 6910,000 0 716,000 6029,000 700,000 6726000 260,600 'Thb womm wume indudo owwmba of obugation, fund betenoe, end 911 Wal hmd r9,1omm. G ra Sy E• fffffw >1 IM 6126 ~1 I~1 moll WIN r~ f~ fililA i!tl ~ O~ M~ MED. 1996-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT r ~ r ~ AMIIOPOIB)riK1 Zf" ~ n' # f. .1~• 4 2 iq1 A K :r N ~,1 --777 ``L ~ op~,i.~ TAmr. L%AulhL PIIO=T "AND : fRl6lriYR ,lIIO.~iCT ilAllt ' .VsDllp* ° ' .HMI'iNJGQ • ~"fV110B1a OONrT. COBTT6 MAW. 04-a ORANAOE 001001 OALM WINS 011.1140E !0,000 !0,000 00,000 U -N 00101.0E 001002 PECAN CREE( BRADSHAW TO MAN CHANNEL 260.00 280AW 200,000 00-00 ORANAOE 001010 00rt 6TREETORAIIAOE 480.0 400A0 400,000 90-0 DRANAOE 08100 PACE DANE DRANAOE 40040 40A00 400.00 04-90 OFMKAeE Won PECAN alEat-R000ELL 240.000 260,000 250,000 68-0 DPANAOE 001000 000PERCFMCHANNEL PHASE I am 000,000 600,000 00-0 OPANAN 011001 SOUTH LAKE RETENTION POND 20MA0 200,000 260,000 96-0 op"" 0010NO MOO 0RANAWCAPITALa/MIDVEMENTOPHW 126,000 124,000 124,000 64-0 PAAQ 0000008 ATKITIC FACLITE9 RENOV 6 OEV PH I Wco0 WOOD 000,000 96-m PAAKS 00000 SOUTH LAM$ PARK PHASE I DEVELOPMENT 400AM 060AM 680,000 60,00 W-0 PANTS 00WO UPGRADE EWTI.!7AtV6PHM 700,000 70,00 700,000 0,000 90-0 PAR4 flows UNVt&lTYOWYELANDOC1PNO 2011,000 240,000 240,000 400,000 90-90 7MN4 0010108 ATONAL TU01 LANE$ M I Wm 267AW 267,000 06-90 TRANS 0101 T8 TRAFFIC 010NALa M A 425,00 126,000 026,000 W-0 TRANS 01010 MAYHuADOPINS Ook LECTOR MAO 746,000 746,000 740,000 66-90 TRANS 00100 COLLNO ST PAYTNO AND DRANAOE PWM I 040,000 610,00 6401000 W-0 TRANS 010130 N*W&X"I SWAYS PH 0 1121000 142,00 142,00 96-0 TRANS 010020 4TREET OOINTAUCTION M N 440A0 440.0 460,000 U-0 PUB OAFETY mm PH I FOEJPOLCCANI COMP PM OERY. 21000AOo 2,00.00 2,000,00 11 09-0 Pm OVCS 0'16001 DATA PROCEISINOML24 SYSTEM 2.00,000 2AM= 2,00.00 4,000,00 ~ 240.00 7,IO0A0 0 4AOOA00 11#440X0 2,240,00 14,000A00 57,000 'This ra wxn ow W4kjdm oartMWw of ob9gaatlon, hxld baknce, and genwW fund rosourow. Y r' i a~ 1996-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AMIV7F'Oe®IMCt GENERAL GOVERNMENT t,10TAL {08Sb) .r fmml1Nm ~ ppO.IBCT OPE11At. fr70nf>tldl 1MlTfL / ^ ' YNMITIt 0111161 boy flI6~1lCY ° TTftAM pNIOOrY ' - FUNDM' c"". COSTS IIAIfR. . Nuw~ p~n,~ccrM~ sowni' ;uNaru~n uleau~ t te.000 x6.000 00-9000 ORANAOE a, ma ciaROtuleavwt' CuvERT eaPROVEMENTe 116.000 802.000 vo-9000 ORMMOE 081041 PECAN WEEK SYCAMOFle SOUTH TO RUOOEU 502.000 302.000 000.000 1.000.000 T.000.aoo w-9000 oRAeuoE 08104+ PECAN cREEKrwS PEC-4 09104 00-21M m1nnA0E 08 674,000 1062E MISC0nAM"CAPITAL RiPRdYOAENTSPHv 574AM 574.000 00-2000 PARK6 0003M 600,000 ATHLETIC FACUTE6 RENOY A DEV PH 0 6001000 600,000 1.100.000 1,100,000 M-eD00 ►M16 000724 ATHLETIC FIELDS AOORIOMe AND eAPttOYEMENT6 t,100.00o 600,000 600.000 90-2000 PAF*W 00"m FUTURE INDOOR REC4EATION FACUTY 900 000 600.000 800,000 100.000 e0-9000 ►ARKO 000797 PMK1LilMArElO'AN6K1N 800.000 200.000 M-9/A0 TRAM{ 0010142 JM CRY6TAL NW0E8 200.000 200.000 140,000 140.000 99-2000 MANE 001o67 P14EVROADPAYNO 140,000 300.000 160.000 460.000 M-9000 TP/YW 001067 WILLS VOID fROM YYIYIILL TO RYAN ENTRAIlCE 300.000 260.000 280.000 M-9000 TWm 0010130 R086AW PAYNOSENAK) TO 0EMETARY 200.000 874 000 676.Ow M-9000 TPA" 0010106 1M7<lAWW000PAVN0AIDOFWMOE(OPTION q 8~o 48.000 »-2000 T11AN6 08104 1e SOUTH RuOOEU VFW SIDEWALK 06.000 !6.000 226.000 226,000 N-9000 TRANS 0010170 TTMFfIc 9 0 44LB PH ■ mom 290.000 250.000 290,000 00-2w TM1/6 o0101449 woPteea-7wrotEA>Ktr 760.000 x60.000 040104¢048 6TREETOON6TRUCTKINPMV 766.000 W-7000 TRANS p 0 7.779000 160000 7 790.000 100000 0 7,7T6,000 i uThjS T4lvslwo 60!X09 k101ud616 owVkah6 of ob%adon. fllfld bmk"*. and 9WWOl fUrld f66ou1o66. M1 a it 1~ t16t~ rr~ 166111 wu IN6M Ia1N1 6n~1 r.rv aia661 16a611 69997] 16~ t~17■1 ~ ~ ~ 1996-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GIWERNMEHT C4,t~A1l,C~.APAOIGIID Wf, TOTAL s a t ` ' ? r r y,. ~ 1161XJp11~ : ToTAL oolmT. AO y " Pl101ECT : f ;i a ' ~Y Gt Y ° v~ C' r tti6LYIR`'4 5 a, ttY• s+^ f YL9AM ` rr t V<. N/6MdER . T M1< SON* (Rll~t 11 .1JIMNIM901 ► RM1D1 C101NT. cOSTS g 11AINT. 7000-01 TPA" 001076 WMTAP"TFASSMArf110MT-OF-wA`/) 00,000 di0A00 600,000 2000_01 wwa 001070 MOCKNOBWLANE 00NECTICN 186,000 167,000 181,000 9000-01 TRAM o010w MIBcBlow CON6/=rcN 600,000 400,oo0 400,000 9000-01 ORAP" 01HOM: MI6C OMNAOE 00N6TUCTICN 176,000 1.6,000 125,000 XCO-01 OPAK40E 061017 PECAN CREEK CAANAOENEAR RCBENT90NPMAIIE1 181,000 161,000 191,000 2000-01 DRAF E 061010 PECAhICREEK9RIN04PEC-6 210A00 210,000 710,000 2000-01 WJkDN01 000201 FVTLlREWLDN0 NEED$ 626,000 628,000 626000 1000-01 PMWS 000090 WROVEMEld19T0CIVIC COVER PARKPHAWI 600A00 600,000 DOOA00 16,000 , 2000-01 PARK8 00!611 ATHLETIC FEWADDITX 6PMA6E 1 6004100 600,000 300,000 100.000 6,686,000 9,606,000 11386000 110,000 I `rk rr, amw sours tmkwa cs vk4kta^, of obigatbn, uw bakr4*, and p mrsl fund rssoures. a t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title West Airport Freeway (ROW) Task Schedule Project 0 0010-73 (Month/Year) Design Bid Construct CwWktod Requesting Dept. Eng & Transp Begin Oct 00 V Estimated Cost $890,000 End Sep 01 is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? _ Yes X No Project DescriptionlLocation Provide funding to begin acquiring right-of-way for spine road west of the airport that may end up being the western Loop 288. I Project Purpose Oustification Provide improved access to industrial area around the Airport. The arterial will act as a spine road between the two runways. It will provide the primary road circulation to the airport from US 380 and 135W. ` Request 4y: Planning 6 Zoning Comm, Transportation Subcommfttee, staff, Couna Construction Fwxiitg $chedutle (11.000'S) 1990.97 1997.98 1998.99 1999.00 2000-01 Total Existing Bonds - issue: Authorized/Unissued Bonds UnauthorizedlUnissued Bonds 890 890 Aid in Construction Other Total 890 890 ConstrucSion Funding costs fj 11,000'+1 1996.97 1997.98 199849 1999-00 2000-01 Total Services 890 890 Lend (Right-of-way) Construction Other Total 890 890 00uating Budget Costa 1411, 000's) 1996.97 1997.98 1998.99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Personal Services Supplies Maintenance Services F Debt Service Insurance Fixed Assets Total Pfease list expected source of operating funds. Will this project result In any savings? Yes, approximate amount annually -,X- No AEE006EF f w;'t r to CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Ie Project Title Mockingbird Lane Connection Tuk Soho" Project ! 0010.90 (AforrrA 0w) Dead 8Ad Cemrneet Cempbted is Requestkg Dept. Eng b Trwsp Begin Oct 00 Feb 01 Apr Ot Estimated cost 1183,000 End Jan O1 Mar 01 Aug 01 Ice r Is Ilia an update or revision of a arrertt Clip Project? _ Yn No j 1 Project Desedption!location f Construct a curved eomection on Mockingbird lane at Paisley replacing the existing dog leg. fight-of-wsy has already been acquired. L! j 1 Project PerpraelJuatlfication 9 PrWds safer intersections at Mockingbird and Paisley streets. If I! { t Reauaet by., AA ft TraeaporbWon s66e0rrnalttee, slaw owm& aMm i*ieaail/ I 1 Sakodidr 1+'1,000 SJ 1696-07 169748 1998.69 1966-00 2000-01 Total Existing Bonds - issue: AudioritedNriawed Bonds 11 lirwrdmitedAk issued Bonds 183 183 i 4 Ad in Construction Other { Total 163 183 M ~ caaaeuewa ~r.a~leir cab llt w,OAow 169647 169746 1996.96 1699-00 2000-01 Total Services 26 25 1 Land IRightof-way) Construction 166 ISO Other Tool 163 183 OPO - 11111111 1111641111100 i Caleb .000081 1"047 1N7-g8 1996.96 1999-00 2000-01 Total Personal Services Suppa" Maintenance Services Debt Service lruurence Fixed Assets ToW Plena bat aapeoted aouroe of operetirg futile. i f4 WE M project result in any sarongs? _ Yes, approximate amount annually ~t - No AEE006FI 9 w 4 F J CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title Miscellaneous Street Construction Task schedule Project K 0010022F (Mumth/y"d Design Bid Construct Compieted Requesting Dept. Eng & Transp Begin Oct 00 Estimated Cost $400,000 End Sep 01 r Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? Yes X No Project Descrilptfonllocation These funds will be used for street construction for existing street reconstruction or economic development incentives. Oversite Committee will recommend final choices to P & 2 and City Council. Project Purpose/Justification Many streets need reconstruction work that are not to a complete remove and replace condition. This funding allows small contracts or City forces to complete that work that is above the capabilities of the allocated maintenance funds. Request by: Council, P & Z, Pubic, Survey, Stall Conahucficrr Fmmft Sdw" (11,0005) 1996-98 1998.97 1997.98 1998 98 199940 ToW Existing Bonds - issue: 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Aid in Construction 400 400 , Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 400 400 Caxhuodor► FM4V Cosfs 0 11000IS) 1096.98 1998.97 1997.98 1988-99 189900 Toted Services 0 Land (Flight-of-way) 0 r Construction 400 400 r. Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 400 400 Opnetihy &retgef Cosh 0f,owW 1996.96 1998.97 107-98 1988-89 1889-W Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 Please Gst expected source of operating funds. Will We project result in any savings? Yes, approximate amount annually No AEE00761 10 Y F Le CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I Project Title Miscellaneous Drainage Improvements ►a Task Scb*&Wo Project # 0081062F (MontWYeu) Design Sid Comma CempJsled ti Requesting Dept. Eng & Transp Begin Oct 00 Estimated Cost $125,000 End Sep 01 16 Is this on update or revielon of a current CIP Project? Yes X No 1 Project DescrilptiorAocation E This would provide capital to address drainage or flooding problems in city. These would be completed by the City Drainage maintenance crews or through contractors. it $ Project Purpose/Justification These small drainage problems are caused by lack of basic infrastructure (older areas) or new development (adjacent of I 1 upstream). Finally, some lot to lot conflicts are severe enough to flood homes and should be considered. The Oversite Is Committee will recommend final choices to P & Z and City Council. I J Requested by. Coin P d Z, PuMe, Survey, Staff { Conwirwolle" Fmh*W SChill # 1#1,000,51 1988.88 1886.97 1897.88 19" IM40 TOW 11 Existing Bonds - issue: 0 I Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Vnsuthorized/Urtissued Bonds 0 Aid in Construction 125 126 Other 0 Told 0 0 0 0 125 126 ! COru&UWW FP Carp isI'MW 19"48 1996-07 1"740 111111111111141-111111111 111*11111111111-00 TOW Services 0 # Lard (Right-of-way) 0 I` Construction 125 125 Otter 0 Total 0 0 0 0 126 125 OPWOOV Cosla1,000s) 1986.96 199687 199748 1998.89 1889-00 TOUT I Personal Services 0 l i! Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 I1 Services 0 Debt Service 0 k Insurence 0 l Fixed Assets 0 Told 0 0 0 0 0 0 I1 Please ffst expected source of operating funds. Drainage maintenance crews will use some of these funds to repair channels, pipe systems, etc. r 11 _ _ Will this project result In any savings? Yes, approximate amount annually - -No f feAEE00760 11 t r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title Pecan Creek Drainage Near Robertson Phase Il Task Schedule Project 0 0810-37 (Month/Year) Design Bid Construct Completed Requesting Dept. Eng & Transp Begin Jan 01 June 01 Aug 01 Apr 02 Estimated Cost $191.000 End May 01 July 01 Mar 02 Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? Yes X No project will expand capacity for Pecan Creek Wec-41 under Bell Avenue by improving culvert capacity. Will extend Pecan [::::wee:d ect Oescril0onlLocation k Drainage near Robertson improvements scheduled for 95.96 by adding culvert under Bell Avenue. I se/Jus.ificatioo hannel needs capacity improvements at Robertson and Ball to prevent the diversion north along Bell and the ing problem et Robertson end Bell Avenue. This project wouldcomplete those improvements made in the 1996 . rosf by: l'trd6e, Drainaga Subcommittee, SfeH t".anefrrr ew FwNAitg Ss/wddi (lf,OdO'SI 1988.97 1997-98 7898.99 1989-00 2000-01 Total Existing Bonds - issue: 0 Authorized/Urdssued Bonds 0 Una uthorizedlUn!ssued Bonds 191 191 Aid In Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 191 191 Cawftw ww ruedrrg r Cosfs tY1,f00'e7 1998.87 1997.98 199849 1999-00 200001 Total Services 79 19 Land (Right-of-way) 3 3 Construction 189 189 Other 0 I Total 0 0 0 0 191 191 Opereakilp Budget , Costs 1*11000IS) 1998.97 1997.98 189899 1999-00 2000-01 Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance ^0 Services 0 Debt Service D w_ Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 Please fist expected source of operating funds. Will this project result In any savings? Yes, approximate amount annually X No I~F,~006FE w v i -a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM i Project Title Peen Creek Branch PEC•3 tJ Task Sabedule Project t 081040 f"Wei y"d 00410e Aid CoM&W Completed k4 Requseft OW. Eng L Trensp Begin Aug 00 Jon 01 Mar Of Aug 01 Estimated Cost 1710,000 End Dec 00 F,b 01 July 01 t a Is thb on i update at nviefon of a NnM ClP Pre(sct? _ Yn -IL Pic, Project D"wipdonitacatlon Fi Provide lined bottom from the and of the existing Willow Springs drainage project to KerleY street. The project win improve flow deracteristics and greatly reduce maintenance costs. to l ' Project Purposft"111 likatim p s Eliminate starding water/bird problem and improve esthetics while increaskV the ci*" capacity. !e i ! t z llaqusf by: 0niup A*ecmakkles. Stets I QaaadrnNes lrariro } (1 J'obadall Nf 1A00'2f ION47 188788 1888-" 1"8-00 2000-0! rTOW (a Existing Bands - iswr AudwriaedUisusd Bonds ! U OAll'o WdAJr4aeuod Bonds 210 210 Aid In Construction If opt w " Total 210 210 ffi r I t CataasaaiMao Matrp ' EE cbm 1*1100oW 1888,87 188748 18"48 18"-00 2000-01 Tool I SerMse 35 35 ~I Land 04M-of•wayl corelruetion 175 175 Other S Total 210 210 Qrnrelt/ 1M*oe i Costr01,0011111 18"-87 188748 1"B-" 188A-00 2000-01 Total Persona! Swvkea st,ppaea Maintenance Service Debt Service Insures Fixed Assets Total Pisw ht eRpeatsd sewn of opero*4 fwds. WE this project muh In arty sevirvo? _ Yes, approx-Aats amount amually X No i Al AEE006FD 13 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title FUTURE BUILDING NEEDS Task Schelde Project 0 002001 (Mwtpvyw) 0"10 Bid Construct Coms*led Requesting Dept. Building Begin Estimated Cost $526,000 End Is this all update or revision of a current CIP Project? Yes X No Project Description/Location To Be Determined Project Purpowl lusti8eation ~ To Be Determined Regreesfad by. Courra, P a Z, Pu k, Survey, Staff COW&WCObrr Aw"W SohattlsY 1111000111 1"5-90 199997 1997.98 199849 19994)o Tatsi Existing Bonds - issue: 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthori :ed/Unissued Bonds 0 Aid in Construction 526 526 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 626 526 Corubuofte Pastsiry cow (1!,000'8) 1896.98 199647 199748 199840 10"40 Total Services 0 Lard (Right-cf•way) 0 Construction 0 0 Other 0 Tool 0 0 0 0 0 0 t)Pa I ft Qesfs 01 NoW 198686 1998-97 1987-98 1625-" 199900 Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 M Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 Please NeteaPected eouroe of opereting funds. Cr3inage maintenance claws will use some of these funds to repair channels, pipe systems, etc. Mill this protect result M any savings? Yes, approximate amount annually No ti 14 v +-i i, ra 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1 Project Title improvements to Civic Center Park, Phase I l.e Project RaOwsted By Task Project 008330a Sdodrdns r a i (Mandivyear) Design Bid Corrstruet Comp4ted lisqu oft Dept. PARD Begin 10.2000 03.2001 06-2001 is Estimated Cost $500,000 End 03.2001 04.2001 04-2002 04-2002 I' Is this en update or revision of a current cop Project? _ Yes -'X No is . I Project 0escriptiorULocation is This Is the first phase of a two-phase project which would redefine parking, walkways, and landscaping features in the Civic Center Complex, in order to enhance the ability of the perk to support special events, attract out of town visitors and improve 1; the appearance of the Civic Center Complex. Project would include a waterscape design feature along the drainage ways, -public plazas, formal ardens and other amenities. s s Protect PaPoalJuadfiestlon t The 30 year old Civic Center Complex is Onton's primary location for public events, as well as the seat of government. The park is showing the wear and tear that results from sevsrel events and thousands of participants each year. A major facelift is s needed to restore the perk to its deserved "ft shi ' status in the ~ t W p parka system. iesss~ It S0111110 s 1'I1,000,S) 1999-87 1997.98 t98aii IM-00 20002001 TOW 14 Existing Bonds - Issue; 0 0 Authorizeftnissued Bonds t UnautlhorizedAMissued Bonds 600 500 + i Aid In Construction Other fi $ Total 500 500 Caubsroa" AWMN p 4" as 01.00101 198997 199740 1999-08 1999-00 2000-2001 TOW Services 100 100 Land iRight-of-way) Construction 400 400 0thW Totsl 500 500 ! Cash tof,000's) _ 1984.97 1997.99 199909 1990-00 2000.2001 TOW Personal Services 26 25 Supplies 3 3 Maintenance 13 13 Services 16 15 Debt Service Insurance Fixed Assets Total 36 36 t` Plesa IN expecbed soaua of operating funds. ttt Annu!I General Fund appropriations. Will we project resit In any savings? _ Yes, approximate amount annually X No 97dy 5 lj r 1997-2001 CAPI)AL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title Athletic Field Additions, Phase 11 Project Requested By Task SdradWa Project i 006331 (Mor"Wyeald Dasipn BJd Cautruct ConVated liequesting Dept. PARD Begin 10-2000 02-2001 05.2001 Estimated Cost $500,000 End 02.2001 03.2001 02-2002 02.2002 Is this an update or reviyfon of a current Clip Project? Yee x No Project Oescipbonllocation Project includes the construction of several new lighted baseball fields, lighted softball fields, and/or lighted soccer fields, and adequate parking at locations as determined by the Parks Master Plan. project Purpose/Justification The 1990.20008ond program provides funds for the construction of two new baseball fields and the renovation of several xi athletic fields to hatp satisfy the need for youth fields through year 2000. This proposal would fund additional soccer, baseball and softball facilities to most projected growth in participation bevond 2000. CorabusEkas $060" M 1.QMW 199897 109749 1999-09 1 "040 20002001 Total Existing Bonds - Issue: " Authorized/Unissued Bonds Unauthorized/Urissuad Bonds 500 500 Aid In Construction Other Total 600 600 laaaeeWaOba fasrrxg CaN lI ID" 18) 199A-97 109740 199809 1099-00 2000-2061 Told Services 35 35 Land 1Right-of-way) Constn:.tion 465 485 Other Total' I 500 500 apaiaav drat , Coats ft31.OWW 4999-97 199799 199889 1999-00 2000.2001 Total Personal Services 60 50 Supplies 5 5 Maintenance to 10 Services Debt Service 35 35 insurance Fixed Assets - 1"w 100 100 please Net expected sa•ce of oparaBng funds. Annual General Fund appropriations. WIN this project result In arty savWgs? _ Yes, approximate amount annually J No 97c 16 F r' tttLR~ ~ ~ ~ RfAr Ott ~ tL~ ~ ~6 ttt91M t0rell ~ t~ 1996-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENEW GOVERNMENT - OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED y tii TorAa ; ryE" (I AID TOTAL * T. 1l~+AIC DIV IILI91!!At<MbJ$bTNME ~Clllflrr 4t'SIINiJl4D'LN11gUERb IiI11Df510, . °COOT. cos" ►WNT. OTHER ASMORT Wom O0NS>AXTdAAPnoN o 1e0A00 leoooo IAQAW I.600.00o OTHER AAPORT 1T01 90W TAXLAMAt40tANOA000wmONISWNCATH 0 207,300 2071AW T.SaS,wo 2,070,000 OTHER AAPORT 0019006 CONSTIUCTISWRUMWAYEk7EMHONTOTHEA. 0 336.000 3sdAxw 5,010.000 3,351,000 OTHER NIPORT 0019001 OONSTAXTFUE.SICYU0EFACLrrY 406.000 450,000 486,000 OTHER AAPORT 0010006 00NGTRUCTO96ULAVMTONTOWNALSULDSK] 0 712AW 712.000 313,000 11076,000 OTHER AAPCRT WNW CbNSTAUTO PARKING 9U1M®MAOODAD.EXT. 0 151.000 lei= 11719.000 1,910,000 OTHER ASIPCRT 0019006 RELOCATE MASCH SRANCH ROND 0 230.000 2301000 2,006,000 2290000 OTHER DRAENAE 06100E COOPER CAErXCHM09LPHASE 1 21616,000 2,630.000 2636,000 OTHER DRAINAGE 0111012 SEOUONPAA DRA AGE 1,201,000 12031000 1,203000 OTHER ORANAM 001013 THLNDE1SAD DRANAOE 97.000 57AW 97,000 OTHER DRANA3E 061014 DANE CATWORTHDANEDRAI-LWE 360.oco 300AW MAW OTHER CAA AGE 06161e OOIBNRCYIDBRIDGE 1.1011,000 1.102.000 1,102,17170 150,000 OTHER DRANAOE 061000 HOUSTONPLACfJB91A0RAFAAOE 517,000 617.000 317,000 WHIR CR414AM mm E HICKCRY STRUT 100,ooo 100,000 10CAN OT►61 DRAINAGE 037094 S.800081TReETORAN0j0E 334,000 3"A00 335,000 011191 DRA►MOE OSH 001 OAKLAND 67REE I DMNMOE I A11S.000 1.0115.000 11049,000 OTHER DPA06WE Woo? NORTSIOOEORMI110E 313.000 315,000 313000 OTHER DRAINAGE 061026 87RIC1411NDJIMgR HIOM CAANAOE MAW 107.000 107.000 OTHER DRASMOE 061050 EVT319PNMOMAYDRIAMA E 25.000 MAN 20000 i OTIER DRAWN 061001 SHADY OHIOORA11&W 060000 MAN 9561000 4.000 OTHER DRAPOne 061002 WI SIPWCRAINW 8101000 aI0.000 510,000 40.000 07HM ORAPOM won MOOKNa ADU11ECRANAOE 66.000 06,000 66.000 OTHER ORASIAOE OIHO04 COOPER BRANCH CRANAOE 14111000 142.000 142,000 OTHER DRASIAOE mm PECAN OILM KER EY TO MOW 1101000 41 SAGO 415.000 OTHER DANW41i won (R)OFER CA CHAN PH M IkL DETENTION PON00) 21000,000 2.000,000 2,000,000 OTHER GRAMO E 09I046 PECAN OWW t MN91SIP/ TO DOWELL 517.000 61 TA00 $17.000 01161 CRANAOE 061044 PECAN CREEK 00RDELL70FLA.TON /58.000 160000 186.000 OTHER ORAMWE 0010116 PECAN C RES( SAN OWEL TO04ARAOO 344,000 344,000 SKOW 'TIIIs tev~ source Inehr!es cor"cates of obigodon, turd bW&nce, and Q"IW fund resources. J M F t r OD 1996-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN tea, GENERAL, GOVERNMENT - OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED ,,a ~ r ' 'T01'AL 2 w r / S AND :AA: . OPEMT e11NAtlffi. Y: ~1 A"D m" 1~T. ax~ !IrA~v~A1wR V`T~~yy.~ ^ : 100.000 1!0,000 oT1,e1 DPAPO E WON pew o* 3(4pek1o I TO *vw CA 1 1ft~ 221. 00 221000 OTMM DRMl1OE won 000Wo1EEKWRDSOIDRAA4T0DUAVE 221A00 11s.o00 116A00 Ile ow OTle31 Di1ANiAOE 061067 ANOEIJNBBIODAANALIE 617A00 071rw CRMIAOE 061000 MLLSROADORANAAE e47A00 M7AOo 26peD 20,000 O1H61 OTIABIAOE 061068 EL PASBO FABK;H CfiAN SGAW 188A00 0111B1 OMNAOE 081061 BANTA MONN;A ORANAOE 1 wooo 138,000 maw ~ oop OTHBI DRMIAOE 061006 B6INMIOJBYCIMIOIIE STAEET DRANAOE 880.000 loom 140A00 100,000 on+et awLwE moo? ,A~rlsor4eLw0►1B1TrSTREET OMN1AOE 116,000 ,t0.000 olim OIVWAOE 061o06 WOODSTFWWAK44E 110.000 6e1.00o 0111.000 581.000 oT4fee DAANAOE 08100 BElLNIESro1VYlArdE PARM 9740 DAANAOE 111B.o0o 182.000 One31 d1A01M3E 061071 182,000 MAW 208,000 OTHBi CAAHAOE 061072 MON1ECCf1 LAABWASS X000 202AM orrm ORANAOE 061074 MWOAKSOMA94AGE 2016000 180.000 100.000 100AM 0111M OIIANAQE 061086 1MAEYS1PEl"rORABNOE 186A00 186AOC 011151 CAAF" 061086 OBVVAOAKAAEFRYC►wO*LPAK NBIRMT10N 136.000 274.000 274,000 546A00 074791 PARKS 001602 UVIOBCIPE LOOP 261 MOT IN TED BY TX 007) 274.000 2.208.000 2.2114.000 28011.000 o1MH1 PAP" 000800 NEWAOWTc11CEM@1 1 000 140.000 Mm PAAKS 000002 COIARADOBOLUVAA) UWOSCAPNO 146,000 2.100.000 2,400.000 2,400A00 OTMM PNM 008045 NCAT11 0TTECREATIONCeNM ,400,000 ,400 0 1800AW Olim PARKS 000000 apROVBAWM TO CW C COMM PARK PHASE a ~ 1170.000 O'n1BR PARK! 008002 CHIC Otfr1B1 BULDI'1O r03U0VAT10N 610 .000 011181 PARKS 00" DM UPIO 1T OF 40AT1 WTPARK SnE PHAK N ~w j e7A00 SIAM r7AOo 011181 TRANS 0010101 SOATIOMDAWPAVNO 1SIAOO 106.000 071181 TRANM 0616106 aREBir•Af CNCI,EPAYNO AND OAANAOE 166.000 "LOCO 762A00 762.005 oR031 TRM "1 0010408 MocKwaB10lN PAV a ORANOLMA TO MNaQ ,Opp 446.000 1 AM 31,000 01140% TRAMS 0010140 MOCIOIVmPD L44 PAVNO N+0 ORAPLAOE PABYEY 10 MA1N 440.000 S AW ALLEY REOONOW CTION 81.000 071151 TAAN11 00+0414 PB18HN01! *TNs revenue source includes certllf oS of obIgaWn, hmd baknce, and prwsw fund resources. z a K L++W7 L~ric.I I.wws4 I.. H~ hoof 1.1 al" 000101 tttBt~ ttttttM ttttt~ tZi~ 1996-2001 CAPITA! IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT - OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED c11>yluvlorrlPlN3ro6EOwtt TOTAL 11/4:400) z. ammo AID: TOTAL omAT. tIlIOJ6tl[ aF7(15TIIIO,A'. r 1411 Ft.'^ ' I11UIf7131t OTHI1 '0" MI ` PPOAW AND ° • ` , rEArl' ON/OM N1NISElt t4110.1EOTltA11H 4iN11rU1M (rNM64*0 RmolmO OOMT. CONS MAW. i 01H94 TRANS 0010112 U NDSEYSTREETCUL-DE-SAD 62.000 52.000 62,000 OTHER TRANS 0010113 MAPLESTPAVAIDCRAII(WP.GHTOBERNAAq 224.000 224000 224,000 OTHER TRANS 0010114 RANCH ESTATES STREET RECONSTRUCTION 765,000 756,000 756000 1.000 F OTHER TRANS OMOI17 ONOAWNSTREET PAYNO 51.000 61,000 51,000 OTH99 TRANS 0010110 MEADrAV RODE CAME OIL- DE-SAC 47,000 47.000 47,000 OTHER TRANS 00101200 LOOP 20W490BYPASSRgNT-OF-WAY 2,677A00 215771000 2,517,000 74,000 OTHER TRANS o01 o126 MCOOMMCK $I DRENPMRVN TO ROSEIAW14 250,000 200,000 260,000 OTHER Two 0010124 CARROU Eww. EXTEND a. R OOE TO WINDOM 36,000 30,000 36,000 OTHER TRANS 0010125 OONNECTION RD (TEABIEY TO STATE SCHOOL Rq 304,000 354,000 354,000 OTHER TRANS 0010126 NORTH NOTTINGHAM EXTENSION 406,000 466,000 406,000 OTHER TRANS 3o101a 9SOME SRA WAOMea 0077 TOROSMAWN4 1,016.000 11016000 1,016,000 OTHER TRANS 3 IMI RoeELAWN EXTENSION (TAMES ST TO BONNE B) 1,196.000 1,156A00 1,1901,0DO OTHER TRANS o31m31 EMTWINOSOR OWE EXTENSION 300000 390A00 356.000 OTHER TRANS 0010131 WESTA*MlFREEWAY PHABEI 41006.o00 4,006,000 4A06,000 OTHER TRANS 0010140 WEST APPORTFREEWAY PHASEI 2,556000 2,555,000 2,566,030 OTHER TRANS omo+3/ AUDOSAA11N000ON4EOTON V2.000 Mow 272,000 OTHER TRANS 0010134 OP1100M SYSTEM 521000 62,000 62,000 OTHER TRANS 0010166 AOSELAWN PAV ANO MAN OERNAAD No FT Wl 346000 346000 346,000 OTHER TRANS 00/0146 mu Avg" - LOWER ROAD 21100,000 2,100,000 2,100,000 OTHER TRANS 0010160 9OWM91FEETSOEWALX 100,000 I00A00 1001000 OTHER TRANS 0MOISI OAANTPN40IYAYSOEWALK 04,000 34,000 34.300 OTHER TRANS 0010162 SOUTH WOW STREET PAVNO AND OPAPC40E 160100 166000 160,000 OTHER TRANS OOI016 AVBIUESPAVNO 153,000 163,000 153,000 O lm IRANI 001056 WESTWAY PAY04 ANO DAANME 401,000 401.000 401,000 OTHER TRANS 001066 BERNAIDSTREET PAVNOANDDRANAOE 1,500,000 1150,000 1,500,000 OIH11A TRANS 001067 WOM STREET PAVNGI *0 DRANAOE 767A00 737,000 737.000 ern" TRANS 001010 IA1106 ROW PAvwa AND DRAINAGE 2.404A00 2.464.000 2.404A00 071191 IRA4$ 001061 EAST WINOSOt DRIVE PAVING AND DAAI AM 412A00 612.000 512.000 OTHER TRANS 001062 WEST WINDSOR DRIVE MUG AND CRAPIKJ (*41 3110,000 314110,000 3,510,000 •TNs rev~ sourc6 Inckides coftates of obigation, fund balance, and gwwml fund resources. r b a 0 1996-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN c1p,1r1~.4P11~•EOv«, GENERAL GOVERNMENT OTHER PROJECTS SUBMITTED ~iwEMOI M i ,y r3 r c f~a w ..L y t , y1 x w w ~j4 s• y" r A ` .l' ~r ►s~ C~ yJ, lam- r1AT. jilt. & x w u"~'~ i `R w . b SO d n ' w n .x 7 J R.z an >K f~ > w wJ• ' x. ':y+ •:r~ yA..e q 'Sl" ``YI~iVRV IM~Ynw/o VNwT+' 11 _W OTT" TRANS WOO B U1H SOWN ow PAVING A/1D t7 WWE 2.902.000 2,!02.000 2.!!02,000 PM 6A67A00 OTHER iRANB 0010M IAAYIa.L Am PAVING MV MANAGE 6,667A00 s, 1116.000 OTHER TRANe 001016 WYOUROAD PAVNOANDCRANA01E PHASE1 4,046100 4,046000 AN W?.000 067,000 014191 TRANS 0010/1 OOLUi ST PAVING • dW1 P►M~ 1 MAN 4~s13~000 OTHER TRANS 001076 VAKH BRANCH ROAD PKW 0 I.Mooo 1,s46.000 76100 4.17SAW 014191 TRANS 001077 STATE 6O1100LROAD PAVfWA!'1001W~M/3E 4,176100 1.1 202,000 WHIRR IRAN$ 001010 MOMP4 AD SHOULDER 202,000 202100 160 00p 160,000 loop" 074191 7RAN8 001011 AV9AlEAPAVNO 1.26ZA00 1,4Q2~000 OTM9n TRANS 001012 SCRPTU1E81FWPAWKiAN00RANAM IMA00 461100 401.000 Nt 100 01!191 TRANS OOnOM NE6TYI/10SOit ORNE PAVING (OPTION N 710100 710.000 OTT61 VANS 001011 PAYNE OWE PAYNO AND ORANAOE 710.000 1000 I'Smo0o IANA00 OTHER 1RIWS 001016 AUyIALANE PAYNOANDORANADE 265000 256.000 OTHER TRANS 001011 SBLAWEIUEOORONAOOTOCAM 250.000 73.591100 1,1),6000 76000,000 10,743.000 66.746,000 •Thla reverxls sources Includes ce0cates of ObigaBon, fund balance, and general fund resources N .d r ~J 4 IJ UTILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN r The fiscal year 1997-2001 CIY totals $125.216 million as compared to S114.473 million the 19%-2000 CIP. In comparison to the 1996-2000 CIP, the 1997.2001 CIP reflects increases for each department except Wastewater. The five year CIP, by department, is shown below as compared 4, to the 1996-2000 CIP: FY 1997-2001 FY 1996-2000 r ELECTRIC $ 54.556 million S 50.459 million i , WATER 28.082 million 22.522 trillion WASTEWATER 29.203 million 30.318 trillion r s SOLID WASTE 12.279 trillion 10.204 million E FLEET SERVS/OTHER 1.096 million _ 970 million Total $125.194 trillion $114.473 million it i The Utility funded CIP, exclusive of the Fleet SeMces/Other CIP, totals $124.120 million for the fiscal year 1997-2001 period as compared to $113.503 million for the 1996-2000 CIP period, an ! s increase of $10.617 million, or 9.4%. tt Drainage and Fleet Services capital programs are funded by General Government. For the proposed CIP, the Fleet Services Machine Shop has been dissolved and appropriate CIP items have l been absorbed by the other utility departwets. ie l MAJOR ISSUES/PROGRAMS/PROJECTS -1997-2001 CEP I r Ekc b k Pro&cdar Power Altereativer - The CIP currently contains $27 million for a 38 MW (50 E 1 MW additional capacity) combM cycle gas turbine generator at the Spencer plant for fiscal year 1 i 1998. However, other viable power supply alternatives will be studied in greater detail prsor to a t decision on this project. This project accounts for 4911/o of the total Electric CiP and 22% of the Utility department CIP. t e New Utility Savice Center Facility - The Electric CIP contains $6.700 million for a new Service Cater facility that will support all Utility divisions. Construction and relocation of functions will be i in phases, with contract award in 1997 and final relocations occurring in 2001. How the other I b utilities will pay for their share of the costs has not been determined at this time. i Flecmie Substation Evpansion4nWrovement - The proposes CIP does not include tha addition of ! any new substation, a change from the existing CEP which included a new downtown substation in 1998/1999. The new CIP contains funding to duplex the rim Christal substation in 1997 at a cost of approximately 5750,000. The substation CIP also continues the 10 year 69KV breaker replacement t+r program begun in 1992, as well as the I SKV breaker conversion program. to I P9 21 r 4 Electric Distribution Line Overhead to Underground Program - The program has normally been funded at one-half of one percent ($350,000 . $400,000) of electric revenue. In 1997 and 1998, however, the University Drive and Denton Center Line projects add another $345,000 per year to the program. Wirer Hang Construction Project - The projected costs cf a new water treatment plant at Lake Ray Roberts are now appearing in the proposed five year CIP as engineering costs associated with a booster pump station/ground storagelsystem tie-in project and a finished water transmission line project. Actual construction of the plant is scheduled to bepn in the year 2003 with a completion date of 2005. Water Regulatory Disinfection Modification - A $6.083 million effort to install an ozonation disinfection system at the water treatment plant is programmed for 1999 - 2001. This project is needed to conform to anticipated EPA rules affecting disinfection byproduct levels. - Elevated Storage Tank - The Water CIP reflects the need for two new water towers, one in the middle pressure plane in southwest Denton at a cost of $3.525 million, and another in the upper plane akxig 1-35 at a cost of $940 million. Site location will be a significant issue, particularly in the middle pressure plane area. Wastewater Plant Expansion Project - A $13.040 million wastewater treatment plant expansion t project is scheduled for completion in 2000. The financial impact of this large project is being offset by the scheduled completion of the debt repayment to the Electric utility in the same year. . Wastewater Lift Station Improvements - 54.475 million is allocated in the 1997 and 1998 CEP for a new Gflstation to serve the Cooper Creek Sanitary Sewer basin. Another improvement provides $350,000 to replace th; force main along Teasley Lane, from Ryan Road to Lillian Miller. State Highway Relocations - The Water and Wastewater CIPs include approximately $3.9 million to relocate service lines along FGghway 380 ($3,292 million) and Highway 377 (5.608 million) in 1997 and 1998. Water costs account for $2.724 million, while Wastewater costs total $1.176 million. Solid Wade Landfill Expansion Project - The landfill expansion project is scheduled for completion - in 1997 at a new CIP cost of $4.231 million, The CIP also has $2.900 million for Phase I excavation and Phase 2a work beginning in 1999. Solid Waste Interme&ate Processing Center - This major Solid Waste project provides a facility to process recyclables, scheduled for completion in 1998 at a cost of $1.982 million. ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT CIP SUMMARY The total 5 year 1997-2001 CIP totals $54.556 million as compared to current $50.459 Y million CIP. This represents a $4.097 million increase over last year's CIP and relates primarily to I 22 :I a s ~a l Ea i the addition of a new $6.700 million Service Center facility to the CIP. Fiscal year 1997 accounts for $6.521 million or 11.8°/a of the total 5 year program, and is financed primarily by current revenue t-s ($4.503 million) versus bond funds ($1.945 minion), i A comparison of the proposed 1997-2001 to the current 1996-2000 CIP, by year is as follows is in million): 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 tf 1997-2001 CEP N/A 6.521 32.989 4.640 5.311 5.095 f s 1996.2090 CIP 4.449 5102 30.227 LM 4,554 N/A Difference .719 2.762 (.788) .757 f4 10 The major 1997 projects listed below are detailed in individual project sheets within each t division's budget/CIP section. The following 7 projects total $4.579 million, or 70% of total fiscal year 1997 CIP expenditures in millions): I~ j t -Service Center Facility (97-1021I-01) $ 1.125 -U/G Extensions/Improvements (97-1031-03) 1.421 d -Overhead Fidensions/Improve (97.1031-01) .318 ! t -Denton Center Line Relocation (97-1031.09) .345 -Contingency (97-1031-08) .400 s -rim Christi! Substation (97-1032-02) .750 -Meters and Assoc Equip (97-1034-01) .220 I t Other capital expenditures are highlighted on the 5 year CIP summary page (by group it assignment number), Every single project is also listed on the 5 year summary, by year and by division. Major capital programs include: I't -Gas Turbine Combined Cycle ($27.0 million in 1998) 1 -New Central Dispatch Facility ($6.700 million in total 5 year CIP) -Distribution substations ($1.076 million in 1997. $1.865 million in total CEP) I -Underground improvements ($5.245 million total CIP) i -Overhead extension/improvements ($1.814 million in 5 year CEP) i o -Over/Under conversions ($2.285 million in 5 year CIP) t y WATER DEPARTMENT CIP SUMMARY I The total 5 year 1997.2001 CIP totals $28.082 million as compared to the $22.522 million I e 1996-2000 CEP, an increase of $5.560 million. The primary cause of this increase is the addition of $4.017 million for the plant disinfection modification project, including $3.8 6111lion in 2001. The state highway relocation costs also increased by $1.459 million. The CEP also contains S11.250 for 11 development plan line funding at $290,000 per year. i ter f t+t 23 l`3,4 K 7 A comparison of the proposed 1997.2001 to the current 1996-2000 CIP, by year is as follows (S in million): 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 - 1997-2001 CIP N/A 4.090 8.207 4.805 4.552 6.428 1996-2000 CIP 5.098 M 5,056 1125 3,691 N/A Difference (1.462) 3.151 1.680 .861 The fiscal year 1997 portion of the CIP totals 54.090 million, consisting of $1,327 million in revenue funded projects, $2.669 million funded by bond debt, and $94,000 from aid in construction. The major 1997 projects listed below are detailed in individual project sheets within each division's budget/CEP section. These projects include (in millions): -Distribution Sys Upgrade (Kerley) (97461-G09) $1.094 -2 MGD Elevated Storage Tank (97460-06) .270 -State Hwy 380 Waterline Relocation (97-461-G12) .537 -State Hwy 377 Relocation (97461.13) .265 -Development Plan Waterlines (97-461-08) .250 -Disinfection Sys Modification (97460-05) .225 These 6 projects account for $2,641 million or 65% of the total CIP expenditures for fiscal year 1997. Other major projects in the 1997.2001 CIP are highlighted on the 5 year CIP summary page (group assignment) and all projects are listed on the 5 year summary, by year and by division. The following major capital programs account for 940% of the total S year CEP: -Regulatory Disinfection Modification - ($6.808 for 5 year CIP) { -Elevated Storage - ($4.465 million over 5 year CEP) -State Hwy Relocations - (52.635 million for 5 year CIP) -Replacement Water Lines/Field Services Replace Waterlines - ($2.334 million over 5 year CIP) -Distribution System Upgrade - ($1.138 in 1997 and $5.417 million over 5 year CIP period) -I-35 Water Line (Sanger) - ($1.630 million for 5 year CIP) -Taps/Fire Hydrants/Field Equip - ($1.797 million total over 5 year CIP period) -Development Plan Waterlines- ($1.250 million total over 5 year CIP period) WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT CIP SUMMARY The 1997.2001 CIP totals $29.203 million as compared to tt,e 530.318 million 1996-2000 CIP, a decrease of $1.115 million. This decrease is not due to any major program changes, but 24 a Fa reflects minor adjustments to existing programs. The major expenditure remains the S 13.0 million upgrade to the treatment plant scheduled for 1999 and 2000, and this project accounts for 451/0 of ' the total 5 year CIP. A. comparison of the proposed 1997-2001 to the current I W&2000 CIP, by year is as follows ii (S in million): 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 a, 1997-2001 CUP N/A 4.858 6.026 6.443 7.845 2.031 t 1996.2000 CIP 4.002 L2§1 4.930 8.066 !M N/A a Difference (.410) 1.096 .377 (.207) Within the total 5 year CIP, $4.858 million is reflected in fiscal year 1997, including S 1.285 million in revenue funded projects, $3.523 million funded by bond debt, and $50,000 from aid-in- ! i construction !r T he major 1997 projects listed below are detailed L-k individual project sheets within each t division's budget/CIP wcOnm. These 7 projects total $3.745 million and account for 79% of the 1997 t t CIP and'.nclude (in millions): 1 + -Cooper Creek Lift Station (97-471-HI t) S2.100 -Denton West Force Main (97-471-H12) .307 -1996 Upgrade Interceptor I&I (97-071-H05) .301 -Ft Worth Drive Sewedine Relocation (97-471-13) .284 ! s -Replace Sewerline - Archer Trail (97-471-H10) .278 -Development Plan Lines (97-471-04) .250 -Infiltration Inflow Investigation (97.471-06) .225 tt { Other major projects in the 1997-2001 CIP are highlighted on the 5 year CIP summary page t e (group Assignment Numbers) and all projects are listed on the 5 year summa,-y, by year and by division. Major capital programs include the following: F ! e -Wastewater Treatment Plant Imp/Exp - $13.674 million in the, 5 year CIP) -Liftstation improvements ($5.064 million in 5 year CEP) -Collection System Upgrade - ($3.351 million over 5 year CIP) j t -Replacement Sewer Lines - ($2.127 million over 5 year CUP period) -Infiltration/Inflow Projects - (SIA25 million in 5 year CIP) i -Development Plan Sewer Lines (S 1.250 million in 5 year CIP) 14 -State highway relocations - (S 1.129 million in the 5 year CIP) These programs account for 96% of the total Wastewater 1997 -2001 CIP. Over 5211/6 of Total rs capital expenditures occur in 1999 and 2000, due to the treatment plant expansion. r~ t4 25 Y C F SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT CLP SUMMARY The!otal 5 year 1997-2001 CIP totals $12.279 million as compared to the $10.204 million 19964000 CIP, an increase of $2.075 million : t is increase is due to additional costs associated with landfill expansion-permitting projects during the UP period. The major expenditure is for the construction phase of the landfill expansion at a cost of $3.231 million plus another $1.000 million for property. A major follow-on landfill constructiion/expansion accounts for another $2.900 million. Recycling adaitionstimprovements total $2.215 million in the CEP. These efforts account for 76% of the totrA 5 year CIP program costs. h A comparison of the proposed 1997-2001 to the current 1996-2000 CIP, by year is as follows (S in million): 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 1997-2001 CEP NIA 5.386 2.870 .988 2.488 .547 1996-2000 CEP 5.437 2M .676 LOD 05 N/A Difference 2.999 2.194 ( .711) 2.483 Within the total s year CIP, $5.386 million is reflected in fiscal year 1997 (44% of the total), which includes $335,000 in revenue funded projects and $4.976 million funded by bond debt, plus ano0l.-r $75,000 from reserves. The major 1997 projects listed below are detailed in individual projc A sheets within each division's budget/CIP section. These projects include ('m nOiau): -Landfill Construction (Phase 1) (97-803-I02) $3.231 -Property Acquisition for Landfill (97-803-01) 1.000 -Buffer Zone (Trees/Irrigation Sys) (97-803-03) .250 -Water Line - Mayhill-Spencer-Edwards (97-803-04) .225 -Intermediate Processing Center (97.804-104) .200 These 5 projects totaling $4.906 million account for 91% of total 1997 capital spending. Other projects in the 1997-2001 CEP are highlighted on the 5 year CEP summary page (Group Assignment Number) and all projects are fisted on the 5 year summary, by year and by division. Major capital programs include the following: -Lardfiil Expansion - Construction - ($6.351 million in the 5 year CIP) -Recycling Site Impr/Additions .($1.963 million over 5 year CEP) -Landfill Expansion - Property - 51.000 million in 5 year CEP) -Regulatory Requirements - ($1.303 million in 5 year CIP) These, programs account for 86 of the total Solid Waste 1997-2i><:l CIP. Over 67•/. of total capital expenditures occur in first two years of the CEP period as a result of the landfill expansion1property acquisition and recycling (Intermediate Processing Center) projft-ts. 26 b F Y. Programs tr the 5 year CIP basically reflect the recommendations of the Solid Waste Master Plan Comrnittee, although adjustments have been made in terms of costs and schedules to hold down expenses in the recycling area. wr FLEET SERVICES DEPARTMENT CIP SUMMARY ~v w; The Fleet Services 1997-2001 CIP totals $1.096 rrullion compared to $970,000 in the 1996- 2000 CIP. The major project is a new Fleet Service Center facility shown in 1997 at a cost of $1.0 million, and this project accr irts for 93% of the total Fleet Services 5 year CIP. The Machine Shop division has been removed from the CIP and work absorbed by other utilities. There are no other major projects contained in the CIP. Most projects in 1997-2001 are for normal replacement of existing capital items. Facility improvements, including the fleet service center, account for 94% of 4 the total 5 year CIP. Ir This department is not f nid(.d by Utility revenues, but operates as a City working capital fund + under Utility department managemait. Funding responsibility for the Motor Pool fund rests with the i r Finance Department in General Government. is Is Ij I~ !f lr !1 F' t II# It ti Iw 27 if If E i I f# i I# Is i# I` t1 Ir I~ I; ELECT~C I ii I k# I' E# i 11 i i# iM I r~ ro 29 4 k r M~ 1MIlIrI Mr~re ~M1r MMM~M #rw~s Irr~l 1~1 lwrw MlrI4! t~IMM1 r.ry w.q r.r1 FWI MIIMrI rS ~ ~6 1997 - 2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH FIEQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC UTILITIES l$ x 100q d0b0 20 11 TOTAL Br'ii8 iCA1 SOOfY 1 POWER PRODUCTION ADDITIONS $25 $27,000 $25 $0 $650 $27,700 2 POWER PRODUCTION REPLACEMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 OVERHEAD EXTENSIONSAMPROVEMENTS 318 506 333 327 330 1,814 4 UNDERGROUND EXTENSAMPROVES 1,421 803 1,104 1,380 537 5,245 5 DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS 318 238 166 124 156 899 8 METERS 220 1 ?8 200 171 306 1,175 7 AUTOMATED METER READM 90 78 82 162 90 502 8 DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATIONS 1,076 293 180 187 129 1,665 9 STREET LIGHTING 334 300 296 193 244 1,337 10 DISPATCWOPERATIONS 83 945 140 65 as 1,298 11 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 95 as 70 80 95 425 12 GAS PIPE LINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 RIGHT-OF-WAYIFACIL PURCHASES 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 OFFICE EQUIP, COMP, FURN, SYS MAP 52 150 5o es 40 377 15 BUILDINGS: CENTRAL DISPATCH 1,150 1,175 1,175 1,800 1,600 8,700 16 COMMUNICATIONS, AND CONTROL 228 22 9a ea 98 528 17 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENT 40 35 36 36 36 182 18 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 0 20 0 0 0 20 19 OVER TO UNDER CONVERSIONS 645 645 300 395 000, 2,285 20 MISCELLANEOUS. OTHER 426 416 410 420 421 2,104 .1 1 TOTALS: $4521 $32,960 $4,640 $5,311 $5,095 $54,558 "OnOUP ASSIGNMENT fflJMtBERS we used to WOW" W of CIP Pro" by MW ca*gwy of s**n". W F x I w N } 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN EL8CWX UUMEt TarAL' - TOT14 m40mT BOND .CIIIMIEW" UTILITY A30-0I. FWALYEAt1 >rIW.1E43T OCitT FUND DOG CONeM OOST MOM • i GA PROJECT NAME W 620 I 25 s0 q-1011-01 1 (T) POWER KANNT MPIIOVEME~ 10 00 0 25 W-1011-02 t1 (T) POWER PV NT EOUf%4W p 0 20 10 0 10 97-1011-03 14 (T) OFFICE FURNITURE AND EOUFMENT 0 f55 s10 to s10 TOTAL 1000-97 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 1,12s o +,12s o +,12s 97-100101 15 (G)SOMECENTERFACIUrr 0 01 a1 0 61 97-1021-02 10 (Q) RELATIONAL DATABASE SETUP 07-1:21-03 10 (R)CCMFUTERNAROWAREUPGRAAES $1,1 02 61 2222 2 0 0W 2 TOTAL 1006-07 DISPATCFNOPEAATIONB to 9318 $31e so s31e 97-1031-01 3 {G) OM EI(TENSIONS AND MPROVEME►RS 0 40 40 0 40 97-1061-0P 17 (O) POWER FACTOR MPNOVDAENTS 0 1,421 1421 0 1421 97-1031-03 4 (Q)Up~9OpN0A71DMpppYEMEMB 0 310 Wa 0 316 97-1031-04 s (M TAANGRONdERSAND EOUIPMENT 0 56 55 0 55 07-1031-06 11 (1) MOC. TOOLS AND e0UfWENT 0 300 300 0 300 97-103t-08 10 (1) Oh+TOUNDENFOUNDOONVEP44DW p 16 1s 0 15 07-1031-07 14 (G) MISC. OFFICE ECUIPMENTTIFURNRURE p Opp 400 0 400 97-1061-os 20 (M CONTMENCY 0 346 346 0 $45 97-1031-09 10 (G)DENTONCENTER LINE RELOCATE 0 45 43 73 116 07-1001-10 0 (0)RESIDENTIA STFWLIGNWS p 170 170 0 170 - 07-1031-11 0 (Q) IIREET UGKTS - ARTERIAL 79 0 39 97-1031-12 0 (a) STREETLIGHTS - SECURITY 0 M W ~ 473 03 39 073 66,646 qf4 TOTAL ION-97 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION p 110 110 to 110 97-+062-01 a (Rl REPLACE 00 KV DREAKF.I4S 750 0 750 0 759 07-1032-02 0 (0)DUPLD(OFJMCMRMTAL SUBSTATION 0 6o 00 0 00 w 97-1002-03 a (I LOCUST 15 KV SREAIOeR00NVER64)N 30 36 0 3e 97-1032-04 0 %11010"OVEROUMMIENTRELAYS o + 1 0 1 0 71 07-ION-06 14 (4 PURNITUREANDMURES 7o 0 70 Ts ~ 07-ION-00 S (Q) LANDPLMICI4ASE 0 75 75 0 n-lose-pi 10 LOCAL AREA NETwonc COMMUNICATIONS (OPTIONAL) o 125 126 0 its 0p 81.01 i7-loae-o9 1S (4 MISC FIBER OPTIC I710:ECTS (~+D►A 6ee0 5467 IiR67 TOTAL 1000-97 oA=RIC SUBSTATIONS 25 0 25 25 0 0o s2a 026 07-1009-01 is (14 E74G114El:AING APMCA ' INTEORATION 90 5n T01.: +900-h ELECTRIC EN WEERPO 6220 so 5220 wo 0 7S 07-5954-01 0 (M METERS &ASSOCMTED EOWPMENT 0 iS 76 0 10 OT-1064-02 7 M REMOTE METER READING DUVMION 0 10 16 I s t3 0 ~0 e0 Y,320 97-1064-06 20 lQ1UNMEARJP11BlE POWEI W*LY 0 15 sm 07-1034-04 7 (1MLI-METERTESTER TOTAL 1900-97 ELECTRIC MErm FIELD SERVICES i i M Y a• r am ma "m Pon Now mom om" "MA "a" *am mm" "am mum" W" m" 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELSTIMC UTKm" vt 424 v~ , ; . ' T.tY t W TOTAL♦ 4• A 0 r CURMW TOT. . ~~yyv~lyti~yr ateI~A~W-w~ PUNO Qt1 PUNOMKM CONSTR 1. YVP~ 97-1042-01 20 04 VOW EA TWG ENHANCEMENT PACKWE So 010 $to so $to 97-1042-00 14 MRIRIVWANDFWURES 0 1 1 0 1 TOTAL 1006-07 MaCTRIC CUSTOMER HWMIITIDN 0o 611 911 !o if f 07-1061-01 14 (O) MOO OFM E EOLWr#UAWrURE So 925 925 So 925 TOTAL 1096- 97 ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATION so 025 025 6o 025 97-1061-01 6 H COAMAUMCATIONS EQUIPMENT so 020 020 0o S2o 97-1061-09 10 (iO REPU CEVINTAGERADIO REPEATEis 0 16 16 0 10 97-1001-00 16 (R) UPGRADE UTIM DEPARTMENT LAN SERVER 0 12 12 0 12 97-1001-04 11 (N) PERSONALOOMIRWER TRAP" AREA 0 20 20 0 20 TOTAL 1000-97COAM IJNICATIDNS 6o 008 106 So 056 70TAL 1000-97 ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT 01,910 54,503 W440 $73 00.521 w w w A 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELECTRIC UTILITIES TOTAL TOOTAL P'ROJI001 BOND CiJR1AN UTILITY AIO W FOCALYEAR bL1MBEMt GA PROJBOTILWWE 000 T fVNO IIEVENAJT RJNOINO CONSTR COST 06-1011-ot 1 (G)OiA6TINA"COMMEOk;YCLEMTALLATIQN 60 Sv= $V.000 so $27.000 06-1011-02 11 (F) POWER RANT EOUIFMENT 90 120 120 $o Sn 06-1011-02 14 (T) OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT s0 110 1t0 s0 $10 TOTAL 1007-00 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION $0 $V.030 $27.030 $0 s27,030 W-1021101 15 (0) SERVICE CENTER FACILITY $1.150 so $1.150 so $1,150 W-1021-02 10 ppSCADAUP13RADE so 5616 Ila75 so sa75 06-1021-00 10 44 SYSTBA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE so 150 Iso so $50 N-IMI-04 10 %CUSTOMER FEEDBACK ANDMONITORNG 60 sm $20 $o $20 W-1021-06 14 (Q OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE $0 Ills Its so sts TOTAL IMT-06 DISPATCK*PERATIONS $1.150 $am $2.110 s0 $2.110 90-1061-01 3 (0) OM EXTENSIONS AND MPROVDAENT6 so sm 1603 so 1506 96-1031-02 17 (0) POWER FACTOR IMPROYBAENTS 0 36 35 0 35 96-1031-03 4 (0) Up EkTB1810Nb AND IMPROVEMENTS 0 a03 803 0 503 90-1031-04 5 (G)TRAWFURMER6ANDEQUIPMENT 0 230 236 0 230 W-1061-05 11 (A MISC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 50 50 0 5o W-1001-00 19 (s OM TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS 0 300 300 0 300 W-1031-07 14 (0) MAC. OFFICE EQUOMENTRURNRURE O 12 12 0 12 00-1001-06 20 (0) DONTMgENCY 0 400 400 0 s400 o 08-1001-00 10 (0)DENTONCENTER LINE RELOCATE 0 345 345 96-1061-10 0 (0)RESIDS AL STREET LKKrS 0 42 42 70 112 00-1061-11 9 (G) STREET L OM - ARTERIAL O 148 140 0 96-1031-12 0 (O) 91 REEL LKWITS - SECURITY 0 40 40 0 40 TOTAL 1007-00 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION s0 $2.917 $2,017 $70 112,087 06-1 ow-Ot 0 (R) REPLACE 40 KV BREAKERS 1o 115 Ills so $115 94-1002-02 0 (s NORT"AIDFS 15 KV BKAII RR CONVERSIDN 0 120 120 0 00-1002-0 a (I)REP1JtCEOYERCUM@TRELAYS 0 36 36 0 36 00-1002-04 14 (N) PUNMaTURE AND FIXTIA 8 0 10 10 0 10 TOTALIW?-06ELBGTFW SUBSTATIONS i0 $2103 1263 s0 S25 98-1009-01 16 (N4 OKUNEE IMIG APPLICATION INTEGRATION 0 25 25 0 25 TOTAL 1007-06 ELECTRIC ENGNEE IINO so 125 $25 $0 $25 $21e M-1004-O9 a (G) METERS a ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT o Iz78 ~a 78 78 SS-10M-O2 7 M RTIAOTE MEM READVA WK40E 0 18 18 0 18 01-tON-08 20 (G) UNNTWVLW ®lOWF11 SUPPLY f-!0104-0a COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 0 is 26 0 YO o 10 0 10 SS-1094-O6 14 (NpFURNaTUREANDFWI`URE6 - Il1 /0 > TOTAL 1007-910 ELECTRIC MErGR FIELD SERVICES Ir r own !O1 imm ~M 1m lrM1M 1 6taMy No" aw" OWN mm 16tIIw iiiiiiiiiiiiit 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN awn= UT0 ME6 lf#AVM' ° ~J i M 1 Y `I', `c.W1~R7{ a%M~W~~ y IwI~~II l'iYV/Y.~. a^ WT .0w FUND 1 .p !L<;*ymi Max" come" ' COtr' 06-1011-01 14 (Iq OFIVE FURWPJRE AND EOIAPMFNT $0 Tr6 >a 10 $5 TOTAL 1007-06 EIBCTAIC MErM READW =0 /d 65 10 $5 06-1042-01 14 (04 OFFICE FURNT UAE AND EOLIIPMENT $0 16 =6 i0 $a TOTAL 1007-06 ELECTRIC CUSTOMER HION"TION 10 is so $0 is 06-1061-01 14 (G)M16COFFICE EOUPTIP)RIIITURE 60 160 160 00 160 TOTAL 1007-00 ELECTRIC ADMM6TMT10N 60 160 060 SO i50 96-1001-01 6 (!4 COIMUMCATIONS EOMT so 040 040 10 S40 00-1001-02 16 (MFIEPLACEVINTAGERADIO REPEATOW 0 f6 616 60 116 06-1061-06 10 (IQ LAN SEGMENTATION EOUIPMENT 0 6 6 0 0 06-1061-04 11 (14FUM6TUREANOFIXTUAn R 16 16 0 15 TOTAL 1007-0600WAUNICATIDN6 10 167 167 10 $V TOTAL 1007-06 ELECTRCDEPAWMINT 111110 051700 $12,010 670 134,060 { W 2 w o+ 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELECTRIC UTKmEs TOTAL, TOTAL ; ? 910Nb a "6 . CUR16f t))UJ11f• AIDrM! FNCALYEAR $RfMlEil GA M% MT NAME owrl FUND REVEMR P~RNDMIG COMiTR COST f 00-1011-Ot 1 (T) POWER RANT IMPROVEMENTS so $26 $25 $o $25 s9-10i 1-02 t s (T) POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT so $20 $2o w $20 90-1011-06 14 (0) OFFICE FURNITURE AND OXAPMENT 0 10 10 0 10 y TOTAL 1000-90 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION i0 $65 "a f0 $65 90-102111 15 (0) SERVICE CENTER FACILITY 1,150 0 1,150 0 11150 00-1021-09 10 (q CUSTOMER FEEDBACK AND MONITORING 0 15 15 0 15 90-1021-03 10 COMPUTER -AIDED DISPATCH 0 100 100 0 100 00-1091-04 10 (RJCOIAPUTERHARMAREUPGRADES 0 25 25 0 25 TOTAL ION-90 ELECTRIC Dt9PATCHr PE T1DNS 01,150 $140 $t 200 $0 01,200 90-1031-01 3 (G; OM E CTENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS $0 m 6733 $0 $333 90-1031-02 17 (0) POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 0 35 36 0 35 09-1061-03 4 (G)U/GEXT WIDNSANDIMPF0VEMENTS 0 1,104 1,104 0 1,104 09-1061-04 5 (O) TRA FOFIMERS AND EQUIPMENT 0 105 165 0 165 90-1061-05 11 (q MISC. TOOLS AND EOUIPMENT 0 50 50 0 50 90-1061-00 10 (gC/HTOUNOERGROUNOCONVERSIONS 0 700 300 0 000 99-1071-07 14 (G) MISC. OFFICE EOUIPMENT/FURNITURE 0 5 5 0 5 99-1061-09 20 (G)OONTWOENCY 0 400 400 0 400 00-1051-00 0 (0) SUNTATION ADDITION OWNU.G. 0 31 31 41 72 00-1061-10 0 (0) RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS 0 162 152 0 152 00-1001-11 0 (G) STREET LIGHTS - Af .91AL 0 42 42 0 42 .OTAL 1900-09 ELECTFLC DI$TRlWnON SO $2,017 52,617 $41 $2,650 99-1032-01 6 (q REPLACE 00 KV BREAKERS 0 120 120 0 120 90-1034-02 6 (q REPLACE OVERCURREMRELAYS 0 40 40 0 40 N-1032-06 16 (q FIBER OOMMUNICATONS TO.lMI CHRISTAL 0 60 00 0 60 TOTAL 1000-90 ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS $0 6210 $240 SO $240 90-1067-Ot 15 (N) ENOW4EEPJW APPLICATION INTEGRATION 0 25 25 0 25 TOTAL 1906-90 ELECTRIC EN014EEA NG s0 U5 S26 W $25 1 SO-1004-01 4 (G) METERS S ASSOC EOAR $0 $200 $200 $0 $200 9o-to64rlo9 7 (T) REMOTE $4EfER REAOM PACKAGE 0 62 02 0 62 911-1034- 06 20 (0) UN94TERRJPTNLE POWER SUPKY 0 10 It 0 10 TOTAL 19011-00 ELECTRIC METER FIELD SERVICES $0 5301 $301 $0 8101 00-1041-01 1/ ?9 REMOTE WATER METER READWG PACKAGE $0 $20 $20 to $20 TOTAL 1097-96 ELECTRIC METER READM $0 in $20 SO $20 r MI IM am 161! Mot /0rt11 p11Et so" Iww wM ON" MCI W~ bwo mm ~ 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN a=Tm uTLrnEt /CTAL. ; gam. ° i; r ,,r' '~:•,TOTAL f !!l1b,lYCT a PAOJMJCT $ Ilk" C{lil(!Bi i~TKJT'l !1!D=1M . FItCA1 1lEAR c T eta . OQ 1 1001DINO k TA tT 00-1061-01 14 (G)MItCOFMGEQUOM (TIPJAWUM 00 616 $15 t0 itS TOTAL 1966-20 ELECCTNCAOMM6TRATIDN q 618 t/6 t0 116 9Y-1061-01 6 (04COMtWWATIONSEOU6#1ENT /o t20 120 to 120 t 9t-1061-02 16 (1q REPLACE VINT RADIO PO AWN 0 It 18 0 16 TOTAL 1006-9000AtAWATIDNS /0 636 w t0 t" MIALING-00 MOM OePARTMENT 11,160 W,440 64,600 Mt 64,040 w a S 0 r..! u a K E w 00 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELECTRIC UTILITIES TOTAL TOTAL PROJECT PROJECT BoND CURREN UTKM AIO-W FISCAL YEAR INUMSER 3A PROJECT NAME COLT PUND REVL5IAJI FUNDNQ CONSTR COST 00-1011-01 11 (T) POWER PLANT EOUIPMENT 60 in $20 $0 620 00-1011-02 14 (0) OFFICE R)RNITUREANDEDLAPMENT 0 10 10 0 10 TOTI L 1000-2000 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION $0 $30 $30 60 630 00-1001101 15 (0) SERVICE CENTERFACI(ITY 61,600 $0 61,600 $0 $1,600 00-1021-02 10 (R AUTOMATIC GENERATRDNOONTROL $0 $50 650 60 $50 00-1021-03 10 40)CAXTO#AEAFSEDWKANDMONITORING $0_ $15 $15 W 315 TOT/LL, 1000-2000 OIBPATC/1/OPEMTONS $1,600 $66 $1,065 $0 $1.605 00-1031-01 J (0) OM EXTENSIONS L IMPROVEMENTS W $327 6327 60 6327 00-1031-09 17 (G) POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 0 30 36 0 36 00-1031-03 4 (G) U/G EXTENSIONS & MPWAWENTS 0 WA 630 0 630 00-1031-04 4 (G) UO NEW LOOP 296 FEEDER TIE 0 550 550 0 550 00-1031-06 5 (G) TRANSFORMERS $ EOUIPMENT 0 124 124 0 124 00-1061-00 11 (Q MISC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 60 w 0 60 00-IMI-07 19 (1) O/HTOU)000NVERSIONS 0 $05 305 0 305 00-1061-06 14 (G) MISC.OFFICE EW MENT1FUANRURE 0 50 50 0 50 00-1031-00 20 (G)CONTOOENCY 0 400 400 0 400 00-1031-10 0 (a)RESIDENWLLSTREET LJOKTS 0 25 25 33 56 00-1031-11 9 (G) STREET LJONTS - ARTERIAL 0 90 00 0 00 00-1031-12 0 (G) STREET LIONTS - SECURITY 0 46 45 0 45 TOTAL 1000-2000 ELECTRIC DISTAWTION so 62.032 62,002 $33 $21.955 00-1002-01 6 (R)RLRACEOVERCURRENTRELAYS 60 125 $125 $0 $125 00-1002-02 5 RUL4CEOVERCURRENTRELAYS $0 42 $42 60 $42 o0-1002-w 16 (4 FIBERCOMmUNICATONS TO POCKR/S $US. $0 70 $70 W $70 TOTAL 1000-2000 ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 60 $237 $237 60 6237 00-1033-0% 14 (14 oFFICE RJRRMTURE AND FKnAES $0 61o 11,10 $o _ $10 TOTAL 1SM-11MELECTRIC ENOINEEAMO $0 $10 NO $0 610 00-1034-01 0 (06)METERS ANDASSOCMTED8WPMENT $0 $171 SIN $0 $171 00-1008102 7 (G) 810 MTE METER REAOMO PACKAAE 0 66 66 0 66 00-iCN-06 20 (0) UNMTERRIPTIBLE POWER SUPPUE6 0 20 20 0 20 TOTAL 1060-2000 ELECTRIC METER FED SERVICES SO {277 $277 6o $277 oo-1011-01 7 (4 REAOMO SYSTEM FOR GMTWAWATER $o 676 $76 6o $76 TOTAL 1006-$0 ELECTRIC METER REAOM01 $6 $76 670 60 $76 00-1061-01 14 (0)MISCOFFICEEQUIPT/PURNITURE 0 16 I6 0 _ i5 TOTAL 1000-2000 ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATOR $0 $15 $15 6o $15 F ti 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UWTMUY*MES /y j,P ;;MT~OTr~AccL~•~`~ M 1y1CA6R MAME z., d .1X4AT d.un 11weY1P PJ1400- * OOigTll 00'.f INAl~IA ' 00-1061-01 S (4 00WA WAT10"SWffAEW 0 20 20 0 20 00-1061-02 10 n AGRA-: WAGE MW F PEATERS 0 1e to 0 1e TOTAL 1988-200000MMUWAT10N8 80 SSS in 80 w TOTAL 1008-2006 ELEOTMC DEPARTMENT 81.800 83,078 88276 SES 88,14 w ~o s ft k f r, 1 997 -2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELECTRIC UTILITIES TOTAL TOTAL PtOJECT BOND Aft" UTILITIr A1t1-R4 FWCALYEAR >yl► PIIO~CTNA66E gmv FUND HEVENL4 w►~wNC+ CONSTR COOT Lmm-~ 6o "m 6063 so ~0 01-,1011--m 3 (T) POWER P1~WT IMPROVEMENTS 0 20 2p o 20 01-1011-02 11 (T) POWER PUNT EQUIPMENT 0 10 10 0 20 01-1011-05 14 (~OFMEF~RTUREANDBOUIPMENT !0 6010 - 1000 60 to S&O TOTAL 2000-2001 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION (1,1100 W f1A00 30 61,600 01-1OP1101 16 (0) SERVICE CENTER FACILITY 00 f$0 660 f0 650 Ot-1001-00 10 (1 ECONOMIC DISPATCH SOFTWARE 60 646 616 6o 611 01-1001-03 10 (1 CUSTOMER FEEDBACK ANDMOIMTOAM 11,100 $is (1,666 60 f1,e15 TOTAL 2000-2001 018PATCHVOPEMTIONS fa 6300 63'0 60 6330 01-1031-01 3 (0)O/HEXTENSIONS E6MPAOVEMENi6 o x x O 30 01-1061-oe /7 (G) POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 0 697 S30 0 36 01-1031-03 4 (0) U10 WV:61oNe & PM EiAENTS p 160 156 p 156 01 -031-04 6 (G) TRANSFORMERS A EQUIPMENT 0 50 56 0 50 01-1051-06 11 (9MISO.TOOLS ANDEQUIPM04T 0 Oso 900 0 300 01-1001-oe 10 ro OA{ 10 U/0 coNVERSIONe 0 5 s 0 5 01-1061-07 t4 (0) MW. OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE 0 400 400 0 400 01-1061-00 20 (01 CONTINGENCY 0 00 00 43 76 01-1091-00 0 (G)I~IOENTIALSTREET U0M8 p 120 120 0 120 0 _ 41 ° 40 01-1031-10 I (0)STREET uGWS-ARTERIAL 01-1031-11 0 (0)11REEI LIGHTS - SECURrtY 60 62,315 62,053 643 62.056 TOTAL 2000-204; ELECTRIC 14TI I6UTION so so 606 60 663 O1- ,735-0/ a (P) REPLACE 60KV 9REAW" f0 M so so 05 Sm so $44 01-1032-0o e g REPLACE OVEYGIRREE WAYS l0 60 i°° 6o f60 01-1003-09 to (>a FAMMOUMMUNICATIONS TOARCO WO. 6p 6100 6100 60 6100 TOTAL 2000-2071 ELECTRIC SUBSTATIDW so NO 610 so 610 ot-1063-.Ot 14 (N) OFFICE FURNIMAGAND FOITURE9 6p fto fto so fto TOTAL 2000-2001 E1F.CTRC ENGMIEERNG 10 saw 6x0 so 6266 01-1064-01 a (0) MffM S AND ASSOCIATED 61:U K*XT 0 00 00 0 go 01-1004-03 7 (T) REMOTE METER READNO PACKAGE 0 21 21 0 21 21 01-1004-oe SO (G) LNStTF~6d°TEE E POMYFi+ IUPPUp 0 26 26 0 01-1004-06 11 (T)tdETE11TEST1lOARD 6° 94n $422 so 1OTAL:000-20Dt ELECTRC METER FIELD SERVICES ~ 0 20 20 0 120 so 620 01-1041-01 7 RO d1TAeuPPORT EQUIPMENT 6o 620 TOTAL TAL 1066-2049 ELECTRC MATER RFJLLXIIG jmjjjjjmjmjjjmmr~ F 3 am mm 000 Now 61m$ "MR IUMt bm"1 I- M" MiWy bm" Wm *WSW w1 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELWTIIIC YTILMEs TOTAL TOTAL p^0, f PRbJEOT 00,40 CURAM UTILnv w>D-1N ' FIOCALZR PROJEC NAME GOAT NO MNOINti coNSTA COST 01-1061-4" t4 (G)MMOMEEOLPMENTlPUANME 0 16 1s 0 15 TOTAL 2000-2001 ETECTRICAOMNBTAATION so $IS 616 $o $is 01-1081-M 8 (114 COMIMUNICATDN$ EQUIPMENT 0 20 20 0 20 Ot-1061-02 16 (In ADCAGEWTAGGRAMAVEATER8 0 1s Is 0 I6 TOTAL 1000-200tCOMMUNICATIOM so in $66 so Sw TOTAL 2000-20M FA=TAC DEPARTMENT $1,600 $3,452 $5,052 $46 $5,005 GRAND TOTAL ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT 7,446 46ASI 54,296 260 54,555 J► r,. E~ WATER r 43 t M i Yr, w" OWN mms wmd mmd bow $moo Now me" No" am" ON" ON" ow 1997 - 2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH REQUIREMENTS WATER UTILITIES X 1000) GROUP YEAR 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 TOTAL ASSIGNMENT NUMBERS CATEGORY 1 NEW WATER PLANT !TRANS LINE $0 $0 $0 $0 $150 $150 2 BOOSTER STATION 0 0 eQ 540 $0 $600 3 ELEVATED STORAGE 320 2060 2085 0 0 $4,465 4 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE 1,138 1,159 923 922 1,275 $5,417 5 REPLACEMENT WATER LINES 319 262 313 220 220 $1,334 6 FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATERLINES 200 200 200 200 200 $1'000 7 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER LINES 260 250 250 250 250 $1,250 8 OVERSIZE WATER LINES 100 100 100 100 100 $500 329 336 362 377 393 $1,797 9 TAPS, FIRE HYDE, AND FIELD EQUIP 10 LABORATORY IMPROVEMENTS 28 26 48 19 18 $141 p p 0 $0 11 0 0 9 7 6 3 3 $28 12 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 13 OFFICE FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT 15 12 21 12 12 $72 14 MISCELLANEOUS 105 80 40 15 16 $255 16 REGULATORY DISINFECTION MODIFICATIONS 225 500 397 1,894 3,792 $608 18 1-35WATERLINE 260 1,380 0 0 0 $1,830 0 p 0 $2~835 17 STATE HIGHWAY RELOCATIONS 802 1 54,090 $8,207 $4,805 $4,552 $8,428 $28,082 6/16/9618:12 *MROUP ASWNMENT"MMBEAe w WW for MMOCAUM CO CM Pm" M "WO od " o/ *Vw"• A N z- f 6/leps 1s:6e 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WATER uTIUT1Et~ TOTAL TOTAL L7MITV AID-01 FWCALYEAR PIID.IEOT MOND 4URAE1f COOT INID.E1%T "C.OtT F1JgD IIEVlMJI FLIDINNO `00~ 4)A S4 10 N 07-0160-01 13 (N1 M I&CELLMEOLIS OFFICE EOUIPMENTIFL"ITum s4 S4 to H TOTAL 10011-97 WATER AOMM/IBTRATION 97-ONO-01 14 (0) LAND PURCHASES FOR LAKE LEWISVILLE MW WATER PUMP STATION $46 in sc $as so 60 to is so so 07-0400-00 111 (1b OFFICE FURNITURE AND EOUFMENT so 00 la so sa 97-01110-os 14 (R) TOOLS AND EOLN%Wn $110 110 to it0 07-ONO-04 14 M **MI AL FE® AND PROCESS CONTROL EQUIPMENT 1~t26 Ina 10 1240 tO 1220 97-ONO-011 is (6) oISwFECTION SYSTEM MODIFICATION 1270 n-o16oACt I {O 13.646 6270 so W ~ 00 STOWE TANK 07-04110-011 (a) ) 9 MY MO RCSlE11TS YYTPANATED TP AND MW P W WATER FACILITIES 119ee9 119.70 t0 so n-040OA05 2 (0) BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN 110,4n 10 a so w 10 10 so 60 o i0 TRANSMISSION LINE (tool) 80.317 1040 00' 97-01110002 1 (0) FINISHED WATER t 97-0460101 1 (O) ELEVATED STORAGE FOR THE UPPER PLANE 0010 121 i11a1 00 TOTALINS-07 WATER PRODUCTION 1100 So 1100 So 1100 W-0401-01 a (o) oVE14SQE WATERLIM 11 11 W 63 97-0401-01 13 (R)Of71CEPJAN1TLIREANDMACHINES so 1$7 Sal $04 1165 97-0401-00 9 (0) WATER TAP$. LOOPS s0 SOa w to w 07-0401-04 0 (14 REPL FIRE HYDRANTS S VALVES i00o 10 tO so 144 97-01111-06 4 (iQ (1007) ECTOR r a. if, uPOMDE SCRIPTURE TO UNIVERSITY N 1m 1200 i0 i200 07-0401-011 C (1Q(1007)FED SUNICESREPLACIE WATEMJNE$ 10 1111 $111 to $15 1200 /o 12110 s260 to 1260 07-04111-07 a (W REPLACE wATERLIIEO - MYRTLE so 14110 07-0101-05 7 (O) DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATERWIES Si Aso sm $0 ~ t0 1260 07-o1O1-11 1s (O)t-S6 WATER LINE 1404 N t std 97-ON1-1S $7 (9) STATE HIOHWAYSnRELOCAT10N sm so 01x0 $Iso 00 1,.$so 67-0401006 6 (IQ 861140 E MMCALtANE" WAVES - ~D 1$ISO $1,004 s0 11.004 1 iO 1537 p-04111000 4 (+DISTRISUTIOM9Y9TEM11JPORAOE(ID:RLEY) 12.400 {11,17 to 106 10 11114 07-0461012 17 (v STATE HIGHWAY M RELOCATION 1116 to 1164 1164_ so 00,246 97-041011,108 s (W REPLACE WATERlI1ES-LAURELW000 12,006 11.127 si.1Ua TOTAL 1006-97 WATER DOTTOLMON to 1129 1549 60 $129 11 ERS 87-040-41 0 (1QWATL7IMET $0 11 11 so 07-04"-09 1s (IQOFFIDEFURNRImANoEOUIPMENT 10 $is 156 10 $0 07-0409-00 a (6) MSSCOLLANEOUS fouf4ENT 00 it y W 0$I146 $0 4040 12 S7 -01"-04 (R) OFFICE MACHR4ES 4040 TOTAL1000-97 WAFERM1kTERREPAIL t1 iO 61 It so ft w t, 97-o401-01 1 (S) FED EOUrMENT l0 01 N so sa 07-0401_00 13 (IQOFFICE ECLIrMAENTSf1IWrflI1E io N to 110 07-NO-03 42 PQ OFFICE MACHINES to I10 110 TOTALING-07 WATERp101NEEMNO 4 p, f Mo own "M WON mum Now ON" Mo mwq no 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT' PLAN y16/9916:69 Nx°+ a.;' r .TOTAL'. ' 's ; 4 . t.7'O?AL DOTAL : di dll F UONr1 `:11TLITY a AID M , F91CAL 76AR W-000-01 10 ~ LOO MTOpY"Alo a $14 614 t0 $14 97-0400-09 10 MA" SPW" OMFM $14 a 1114 10 $14 n-aw-a 14 m SAC UWT _ V u r~ w ~s TOTAL1900-97 WATERLABMTORY SM 010 900 90 900 TOTALt999-h WATER DEPARTMENT 92,969 91,0¢7 901062 994 04000 A V A 00 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN a+ 16 WATER UTI ITIF31 TOTAL ` TOTAL TOTAL P1$O.EEEC! 'i' PROJ@CT ESO)ID . CEIRREN NYMM AID -1N FISCAL YEAR Pl+OJEOT 600 !'IN4D171G CONRTR coo N-0400-M 13 (111198CELI.ANEOUSOFFICE EOLVVENTIFMWRIJRE $0 61 $1 i0 $1 TOTAL 1007-00 WATERAOMWIMTRATION /0 61 $1 6o $1 00-0100-02 13 (R) OFFICE RMOOTURE AND EOUIPI+ENT to so IS $O N 911-0100-00 14 (RJ TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 10 16 $5 to $3 N-0190-04 14 (1q CHEMICAL FEED AND PROCESS CONTROL EOU04AENT $o 010 110 to $10 N-0100-05 14 (T) PARTICIF COUHTIE RS $0 000 100 $0 685 96-0100-00 IS (0)CMLOIYNATIONSYSTEM EMEROENCYOASSpWS9EA8 1600 1600 $0 1000 to 1000 90-0"cm 1 (O) MAY ROSERTS INTO MID RAW WATER FACILITIES (100 /1 a7IS 10 $0 to to $0 911-0400100 2 (G) 1000T1E10TATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN $10,417 $0 to 6o $0 $0 00-0400000 1 (0) FOIWNEO WATERTIWNOIM6{ION LINE 11001) NA+r /o /o /0 /o $0 911-0480101 S (G) ELEVATED STORAGE FOR THE UPPER PLANE 6948 1000 $0 6N0 60 Sw N-048om S (0) 2 MG ELEVATED STORAGE TANK 13A26 $1.170 $0 $1.170 W $11170 TOTAL 1007-N WATERPROOUCTION 82,000 IN $2,616 $o 12,04E 96-0481-01 0 (G) OVEAS12EWATERUMES 0100 60 $100 to $100 N-0481-01 13 (111) OFFICE FURNRUhE AND MACHINES l0 $3 $3 $0 $3 06-0481-00 0 (O) WATER TACO. LOOPS $0 100 ISO 1+04 $163 W-0401-04 9 (R) FWL FIRE HYDRANTS i VALVES $0 W7 137 $0 937 N-0481-06 S (71) (100 REPLACE WATERLINE $310 6o $17 $17 $o $17 06-OM-08 0 (R) (10N) FIELD SEAVICES REPLACE WATER LIN ES to 12x0 6200 $0 1200 N-0481-00 7 (0) DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATERLINE$ /o $260 1250 to $250 N-0481-11 10 (0) 1-20 WAIEALINE $1030 $1380 W 5+.000 60 11,380 06-0481-12 4 DMTRISUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE (SERNARDI $I.7N to w EN w UK 16-048100 4 (1 OMTMK f*N SYSTEM UPGRADE IKE X" $1,473 1300 so WOO 1o S3o0 011-0481012 17 M STATE HIGHWAY $80 RELOCATION $2400 11AW /0 SIAM $0 61,633 911-0481105 4 (R) (IWn ECTOR M I, IV UPGRADE SCRIPTURE TO UNIVV=Y on MN WOO $790 60 $795 06-0481+7! 0 (!n REPLACE WATERI MMES - MYRTLE $26o to $246 1246 /0 $245 TOTALIN7-N WATEROISTRISUTION $4,100 $1,178 116.283 $104 s5x, N-0482-01 9 (Id WATER METERS W $130 $180 to SI30 N-0102-SIT 10 (Fq CIF ICE FMMNTURE AND FOUIPMENT $0 $1 $1 $0 $1 98-OW-0 9 (0) MSCBIANEOV• EQUIPMENT to $6 18 /0 $1 :1 N 1,37 N-OIN-01 12 (R) oFFICE MtiC110m a 81 TOTAL+Nr-N WATER METERREPAiR /o 8137 $IV 6o /0 11 $1 6o 11 N-OIN-Of 9 (9) FIELD EQUMM34T f0 11 11 IO I1 N-0481-00 11 ()0 oFFlCE [CUWMENT A mml I LIRE W N $1 Io 65_ N-g1S0-OS 12 (T)1JFFICL• MACHINES TOTAL 1007•-N WATER ENOINECJIOKI $0 t7 $7 to $7 ~ c 4 1111 W" 4wd *0" w104 0090 h+d Wri tr* "Now bk*W Muw Now 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN w+abb 16:66 WATER UTILffm r TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL My1CJIeCT sW1O CUIrlOf , UTKM ADO-01 P16CA Vt Al GA _ CORT ~ P~tO CT 1tAYE : Cf3ir ' " flJllo " IIEMENIA " oxwoo " Down M-0110-05 10 M LA/OIIATOW ASMATION M $4 64 M $4 OD-OW-42 10 M 1/C WG 0PE WRM RlXF FACEW* t0 sm 190 i0 0.20 ~ M-ONO-0 12 (T) ON. WP~TION M6Mi. SMTEM a 1+ i+ 10 1+ 0-000-04 10 (R) LAM ECUPMW so $4 14 10 14 IOTALIW-00 WATERLABORATCRY to an to W TOTAL I W-M WATER DEPARTMENT won $t.436 $6,106 $101 '1!.101 A ~O s F V 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ~1°J°61°`66 WATER YTMJTIE6 Al TOTAL TOTAL PIIOd11CT I ECT so" CEI IM t f < 11TA ITY ; A1O-Ni FISCAL TfM q QA hEva" iilIW11/01 CONSTR COST r 00-0160-01 13 (R) MISCELLANGOIA OFFICE EOLWAtEltTfFi WrL*E i0 $10 !10 !0 {10 TOTALIM-OVWATER AOMNMTRATION so Ito 910 90 $10 00-0460-01 Is (6) OZONATI011(SPENM PLAN) DONFECTION SYSTEM t0A03 /307 90 9307 so 9307 90-04,00-09 13 (F4 OFFICE ROWT11RE AND EOUPMENT so s° so 90 $6 09-0100-0! 14 (R) TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT so 96 96 so 96 99-000-04 14 (R) CHEMICAL FEED AND PROCESS CONTROL EQLWMENT to !10 $to so 910 90-ONO-06 14 (R) IIEPLACEMENT OF EXISTNO CN809CJL STOWE TANK us 10 926 126 so 926 09-0460-07 2 (o) SOOSTER OTATMN FOR THE UPPER PLANE 9000 960 W $40 10 160 00-0460A01 1 (0) RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FACILITIES (1966) 116.736 so so 10 !o so 00-0411"m 2 (Gi) SOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN $10,447 so 60 !0 90 10 80,317 so !o so so so 00-0100000 1 (0,) FINISHED WATER T L64E (1901) Sam !2.066 so 92,066 90 92,006 09-0469gd S (6) 2 M2 ELEVATED ATEO 67ORA" 0RAO E TANK TANK TOTAL 1900-99 WATER PRODUCTION 92,642 f40 92,660 10 92696 90-0401-01 6 (G) OVERSIZE WATERLM 9100 so $too so $too 9o u 90-OM -o0 13 n OFFICE F11FM4t7URE AND MACHINES so 91 I s 1161 90-04M _w 9 (W WATER TAPS, LOOPS so so 1S106 96 H6 a 641 S4t 99-0461-04 9 (p REPL. FIRE HYDRANTS a VALVES f22o so m m so 920 W-0461-06 6 (1p (ISM REPLAICE WATERLPIE 9200 99-0461-06 6 (R) (199,0) FIELD sERVIrms REPLAO E WATER LINES so so ~o sm sop um !0 so sm a-0161-06 7 (o) DEM.OPMENTKMWATEF MMES 91x,7 163 W m $0 m 1"It s9-0161-oa 4 ( DWTROUTION 9310 so !296 9m so w-0161.106 s (Ps (119 RSKAEPLACE wATERlM1E st,7q leeo !0 ~ s0 i°°0 00-0401J12 4 DISTFMITION 0YOM UPGRADE MEANARD) TOTAL ION 99 WATER061TA811N 11 q23 :973 51,060 1116 $2,01 1 10 1134 H34 W 9134 90-0469-0/ 0 (p WATER METERS 60 3t I1 so 34 so 84 00-0400-00 15 (R) OFFICE PUMP r ft AND EOUPMENT p 61 96 !0 93 01-OW-46 9 (s) LOCBLAHMIS IDWPMENT _ so 91 11 so $1 96-016E-o/ 12 (p OFFICE MACNNE6 TOTAL 1906-99 wATER METER REPAAi _ so $141 1141 so 1141 Y U F IM Iii MN MMr Ind M01N OWN Mu1 hNON VA" iwrT 00010 000 ~ 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMFNT PLAN a+.ros 1a~s WATER VnUT= TOTAL TOTAL NOW v OA FUMD ° RbVl1111~ . (iONSTIR 10-0100-M 0 (M FEZ EOUNI0IBR IO $1 11 so 11 M-OMS-OQ 13 (Ft OFFICE EOUNIMEJIT A RMITURE 10 11 $1 10 $1 9C-0IN-W 12 M OFRCE MACFIN S6 /0 I6 t6 i0 $6 TOTAL t900-90 WATER ENONEEIMNO p 67 97 $0 $7 20-0490-41 10 m 10P E6MSM PECTROMETER i0 S" N6 IO w TOTAL 1000-00 WATER LADORATORY l9 S" as l0 1" TOTALIM-00 WATM DEPARTMENT 0.606 I1.126 UAW 1116 WADE i x N 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PUN WATER UT%JTIES 70TAL TOTAL -TOTAL ~ mIcu CT W" CUTMIHI UTRM AM-04 FOCALVEAR onma%m AA PR4OUM1 MIME co" FUND ReMNA FiLUDN10 OONSTR COST 00-460-ot 13 (p MISCELLANEOUS C*FICE EQUIPMENTIFIRI'LITURE to $1 to 61 TOTAL ING-2000 WATER ADMINISTRATION to 61 $1 to $1 00-0160-M 13 (Iq OFFICE I TINRURE AND EQUIPMENT to $4 $4 so $4 00-0160-4)6 14 IF# TOOLS AND EOUIPMEN T $0 i6 $5 to $3 00-0160-04 14 ( 048MCAL FEED AND PROMS CONTROL EQUIPMENT i0 $to $10 w $to 00-040cm , (0) RAYROBERTSWTPANDRAWWATER FACILITIES (19" t1S.733 to to to so to 00-046oAOS 2 (0) BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-N $10.447 $0 to to to w 00-o4eo000 1 (0) FINISMED WATER TRANSMISSION LINE (1901) toA17 to $0 to so 00-016010)1 15 (S) OZONATION (SPENCER PLWI) DISINFECTION SYSTEM scom S ~ 60 S ~ w S11894 00-0160= 2 (0) BOOSTER STATION FOR THE UPPER PLANE ;5 t> i tw TOTAL INO-2000 WATER PROUV ` 0ON 12.431 921 $2 00-0461-01 8 (0) OVFJMIZE WATERLINES $100 to $too $o $100 to $3 $3 $0 $3 00-0101-09 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES 72 $1?9 $194 00-0401-00 9 (0) WATER TAPS. LOOPS $p $4 1" 00-0491-01 o (F4 REPLACE FIRE NYDRANT6 i VALVES 0 i $43 1$7872 ~ $43 w $20 00-0461-06 6 (p (20001 REPLACE WATERLINE i22o $4 s $S" iSn ip 1$20 00-001-08 0 (R) (,995) FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATERLINES so Sm $m so $200 00-0461-0 7 (0) DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATER INES 3 W tW to $03 00-0461-00 4 (q DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE (LOOP 295) $10 1669 s iu 00-ow.112 4 (I) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE (BERNARD) $1..7311173 i m 10e $ $,,pp ON to $200 00-ONI IDS 6 (Iq (f909) REPLACE WATERLINE TOTAL 1990-2000 WATER DISTRIBUTION 51.022 1706 If A1o SG 11.932 t0 i1$4 1134 W 1134 00-0192-01 9 (R) WATER METERS i1 00-04011-02 13 (R) OFFICE MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT s `1 S0 $1 00-0002-0$ 0 (S) MSSCELLAN1i0US EQUIPMENT $1 t1 to S' 00-0+62-04 12 (R) OFFICE MACHINES so to $141 N11 to $141 TOTAL 1119-2000 WATER METER REPAIR $4 $1 $1 $4 t1 00-0151-01 9 FIELD EQUIPMENT to 11 $1 $0 11- 00-ONt-02 13 (R) OFFICE EOUIPhM T AND FURNITURE - to $4 $1 $4 62 TOTAL 1900-2000 WATER ENGINEERING W 62 iR t0 92 00-0110-M 12 (T) Der NFOIIMATION MOW SYSTEM :14 62 t14 to $14 ao-0110-OS 10 (T) M.P. LXM C"ROMATOORAPN $9 t0 $S 0o-OW-03 40 (119 LABORATORY IRIVOCIVATI0N $14 o N $21 to 121 TOTAL 190-2000 WATERLABOMTORY TOTAL1009-2000 WATER DEPARTMENT $3.470 toed $4.430 1122 $4.662 M . t R F L' . } 8511` I ' 1 PAN IIIIIIIIN 911tH OW 91r 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 6!11!96 16:66 WATEII UTILTTIEB TOTAL yy TOTAL TOTAL /IIO QT [0$418 dIMEN LITxm AID-IN FOCAL VIAR NU11Ei1i ~ 0U1 MIO~DT 1$ANR OQOT - FUND . REVEMLN FilNDlN1O . CONRTR OOST 01-0480-•01 18 (F9 MOCEUMEOt/80FFICE EOUf4AEN `T/FNNNRURE to SI $1 SO it TOTAL2WO-2001 WATER ADMINISTRATION so $1 41 so $1 01-0480-02 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES 90 $0 is t0 " 01-0480-09 14 (R} TOCU AND EOUPMENT 60 $5 96 $0 $3 01-04e0-04 14 (!q CHEMICAL FEED AND PROCESS CONTROL EOMMENT 80 S10 SID 80 110 01-0180401 1 (0) RAY WOO" WTP AND RAW WATER FACILITIES (198 $18,733 " 60 $0 10 $0 01-0180A08 2 (0) 8008TER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN $10,447 10 " $0 W $0 01-0480001 1 (0) R6&lED WATER TRANSMISSION LINE (1991) $0,317 5180 $0 6180 10 $160 01-0/801m1 t3 (S) OZONATION (SPENCER PLANT) O0m=TION SYSTEM $0,063 63.742 b $3,7112 90 $3.792 TOTAL2000-2001 WATERPRODUCTION 13,0: 821 $3.363 $0 $3.333 01-0461-01 0 (v) OVERSQE WATERLINES 8100 SO 1100 80 $100 01-OW-02 13 (AI OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES $0 $3 63 so 01-0481-00 0 (0) WATER TAPS, LOOPS 10 $84 $e4 $138 $220 01-0401-04 9 (K REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS A VALVES m $47 $47 $0 $47 01-0481-06 6 (R) (1000} REPLACE WATEMM W $20 $20 $0 $20 01-0401-00 6 (R) (ISM FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATER LINES /0 1200 $200 90 1200 01-0401-06 7 (0) DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATERLINES 10 sm 5280 90 1230 0'-0481-1$ 4 (4DOTIMSUTIONSYSTEM UPGRADE (RYAN) $1,661 104 " 984 90 $64 01-046100 4 (+DOTRWAIONSYSTEM UP0RADE(LOOP 2" $1,317 $1,191 So 11,[61 /0 $1,191 of-0441 US 6 41q ($000) REPLACE WATE ARM to 4200 5200 So 5200 TOTAL 2000-2001 WATERDISTRILIfTION 51,376 $604 62,174 $136 $2.316 01-0132-01 9 (R)WATER METMLS $0 $120 $120 90 $120 01-0/60-09 13 (R)OFFICEFURNITURE ANDEOLIVMENT " $1 $1 9O $1 01-0482-08 9 (R) IiOCELLANEOU8 EOLWMENT so $6 t6 60 i6 W-0402-04 12 (F!) OFFICE MACHNES so $1 $1 $O It TOTAL2000-2001 WATER METER REPAIR so $127 $127 90 $127 tl Ot-0188-01 9 (8) FIELD EOLAPMENT 10 $1 $1 so 01-0461-02 13 (R) OFFICE EOMPMENTANDFURNITURE " 81 $1 10 TOTALIW-2001 WATERENOSIEERINO SO $3 62 W $2 01-0490-O1 10 p0 LAS RENOVATION " 63 63 to $3 01-0490-02 12 m OW INFORMATION MOMT SYSTEM 10 $2 $2 /0 92 01-0400-08 10 (N LADORATORY EOLNPMENT l0 116 $I6 $0 SI6 i TOTAL2000-2001 WATERLASORATORY " 120 in $O `120 TOTAL NW-2001 WATER DEPARTMENT ".317 $973 ".292 1138 16,428 1097-2001 ORAND TOTAL - WATER talAn $6.ea1 $21.007 1871 t2e.062 w r - ~s i e; M ri 1 ~r t gi tp WASTEWATER I I ►f1 E~ tt l It I 55 r 1I 5 F w No" Now Woo besot bw=4 kwo Now amm i 1997 - 2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH REQUIREMENTS WASTEWATER UTILITIES X 1000) yGROUR b > A$SlGN ENT** YEAR, 1097 .';1 x98 to" 2000 2001, TOTAL NUMBER$ CATEGORY 1 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMP $173 $78 $61 $62 $260 $634 2 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXP 200 840 6,000 6,000 0 13,040 3 LIFTSTATION IMPROVEMENTS 2,602 2,621 22 19 0 5,064 4 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE 336 750 750 760 765 3,351 5 REPLACEMENT SEWER LINES 342 266 759 380 380 2,127 6 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES 260 250 260 250 250 1,260 7 OVERSIZE WASTEWATER LINES 100 100 100 100 100 500 8 INFILTRATIONANFLOW 375 400 350 160 150 1,425 9 TAPS AND FIELD EQUIP 50 53 63 63 63 262 10 LABORATORY IMPROVEMENTS 75 62 87 67 34 315 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 3 3 0 7 21 34 13 OFFICE FURNITUREXQUIPMENT 5 3 11 6 10 34 14 MISCELLANEOUS 18 0 0 12 8 38 15 STATE HIGHWAY RELOCATIONS 429 700 0 0 0 14129 TOTALS: $4,858 $8,028 $8,443 $7,845 $2,031 $29,203 611 6196 IS: 24 a w, •tonow ANamo r tM NUM MS an uwd for ie. *bmoe of Cr Pro}ar K m Y of J t 1897-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 51161°615:46 WASTE WATER UTILITIES TOTAL' < TOTAL :TOTAL ~110uECt ! G7TY : E±ONO C111iSE1f Of" . ' AID--Ili FISCAL." CONSTR, T 57-0451-01 16 (R) M OCELLANEOUS OFFICE EOUIPMENT/FURNITURE 4 04 $4 w 94 TOTAL 1666-67 WASTEWATER ADMIN. w w 64 64 w N 9?-0470-01 1 (In FENCING w 626 as w 525 9?-0470-02 3 (1q LIFT STATION 6MPROV w 620 $20 w w 9?-0470-05 3 (11) VARIABLE SPEED OR w Sts 626 w 62s 07-0470-04 1 (6) OPERATION PROCESS EQUIP w us S26 w $25 07-0470-00 3 04 LIFT STATION RHVOYMOR CNTRL w 626 626 w $25 07-0479-06 3 (R) LANDPURCFIASE w $26 $2s w 925 9?-0470-07 1 (N) PLANT TRAINING FAC w 520 S20 to 120 W-0470-09 1 (8) SEPTIC WASTE DUMP 1156 w 956 t0 1186 W -0470-M 1 (8) KUARDOUS WASTE STORAGE $0 626 us w 925 W-0470-10 1 (14 PENN VALLEY PUMP w $12 till w $12 07-0470-11 1 M ABANDON (OO-'A LA w S5 $5 to $5 97-0470-12 I (T) RADIO EOUPMERT w M to w tb W-0470106 2 (6)WWTPUPGRADE -21 Mao $13,040 w 11108 w 6p TOTAL 1666-97 WATER RECLAMATION 615040 $156 6216 $400 to 11406 97-0471-01 7 (O)OVWISRESEYYHILIIED $,o0 w $100 w 9100 W-0471-06 O (M $00 1 E11 TAPS $0 w $0 $w $50 17-0471-04 6 (0) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWERLINES w um Ssw w $250 97-4)471-09 4 (0) (1 M7) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR 6 N CORRECTION $760 1106 w $36 w $35 W-0471-06 8 0 INFILTRATION INFLOW MIVESTIOATION 11226 $0 $126 w Sm W -0471-W 6 (14 MANHOLE IMPROVEMENT w $150 Si so w t15o W -MI-0 6 M FIELD SERVICE SANITARY 611WE1 REPLACEMENT w 1100 Sao w $50 97-0171-10 8 w $14 $14 w $14 (10(1007) CLEVELAND ST. SEIMERIPECAN CREEK CR0866a 6246 w 1261 t2a w 11204 W-0471-IS 15 (A) FORT WORTH ONVE$EWERLINER0.0GLTION tt46 W-0471411 1S (14 HWY. no SEWER LINE RELOCATION 6605 $146 w $146 w ~1 W-Wlmw 4 M IOM UPOMDE NTURCORTORA N CORRECTION 0617 5601 w }101 w 97-0471N10 B (R) (1111% REPLACE8111VEN.INE - ARC"91I TRAL S200 w we 8270 w $276 W -0471 H11 6 q COOPER CHEEK LIFT STATION $4.475 $2.100 $0 61.104 so WND7 W- 47I H12 6 14 DENTON WEST FORCE MAIN 66302 11607 w $w? TOTAL IOM-W SEWER COLLECTION $7,821 MIS St,OM 64860 No $4266 w 6, w 111 so W-0472-o2 is 09 OFFICE EOtAPMENT LA FURNITURE 612 07-OM-00 14 (4 SEWER VIDEO CAMERA w $1$12 2 $116 w 1113 TOTAL IOM-W WASTEWATEREHGINEEPM w w E m61 Now "WIS MGM Irm `ft" 0"0 ON* pa" owl* "m go" No" 6s" M" 1997-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SAW" 14:40 WA61TE wAT Ell uT1UT1Et6 x0791 TOTAL ; . : TOTAL ~yy .y yy~y~~ ~~y~/ IW~11t 1'1~W1 F~ VMfo~ 5~ M~ i . 6 A ,J,. aTY ,4 °`'~+IpINA b01447R ODOT p_W-oI W 10 M IAA{s &f6GTOFI ETER $E6 t0 166 $0 sm 17-00"-0! 14 (R) LADFUN04 QlAC tWT /o t0 to 10 66 S? -0m -06 12 M ON WR~TION MONK SYSTEM N $ 63 so u TOTAL 1606-07 WASTEWATER LASOAATORY 0o 164 $0 644 to 664 n-OW-01 10 (e) 6AMPUNG EOLW EHT so 610 $10 to Ito 07-0441-06 10 (R) 6TORAOE 0L6L m uPORAOE i0 110 610 6o Ito TOTAL 1064-07FRETlEATMENT 6o 6o 120 170 so 620 TOTALION-07 WASTEWATEROEPAITFMENT 120,601 66,626 61 66 64AN No 64,466 ~o s k 1997-01 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PLAN WISM 15.40 WASTE WATER UTILITIES - TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL "q; fSTY Blow CRMMRElr. tOS1T _ AM-I; FOCAL irE ►R 1 w+~N FINDING', OOST I 1iAM10JC~+TMAYE Flu NO 00-0161-01 13 (i) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EOUIPMENTIPJRNRUNE 60 12 $2 b $2 TOTAL 1007-00 WASTEWATER AOMMI. to to 92 sZ 60 62 00-0470-01 1 (R0 FE4CM4GL 626 6o 126 623 60 625 00-0470-02 3 (70 LIFT STATION RENOVATION 63 00 p 63 60 63 89-0470-05 3 (T) LIFT STATION SCJADA 615 to 116 616 to S16 6e-0470-04 3 (0) lETIEFICML SLUDGE REUSE 0000 6400 W $400 W 6400 ee-041P0-06 1 (S) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT 622 w 622 122 6o S" ee-0470-0e 1 (S) IRRIGATION EOUVIFNT 620 $0 120 620 6o 620 56-0470-07 t (N) AIR COMPRESSOR 611 f0 111 611 6o 611 00-0470105 2 (0) WWTP UPGRADE - 21 MOO 1610 M so 6040 so 6640 TOTAL 1167-e6 WATER RECLAMATION SIAM 11,440 Iee $1 X* 6o 61 Am 66-0471-01 7 (0) OVERSIZE SEWERLMNES 6100 6o 1100 60 6100 06-0471-03 a (G) SEWER TAPS to 6o 6o S5o $50 ee-0471-04 S (0) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SENrF "ES 6o Sm 62W to 6250 56-0471-06 4 (0) (1006) UPGRADE wrucEPTOR 611 CORRECTION 1750 635 ID 6m to $33 56-0471-0e 6 (1) INFILTRATION MUM CORRECTIONINVESTIGATION 1200 60 6200 6o 6200 06-0471-07 a (F0 MAm4OLEIMPROVEMENT so 6150 4150 so 1150 6e-0471-06 S (R) FIELD SERVICE SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT 6o 160 660 t0 650 66-0471-11 S (R! REPLACE SEWERLw0 - UIDERWOOD 6714 so 536 635 to wa 00-0471011 15 (10 MY Ie0 SERVER LINE RELOCATION feet 6700 6o 6700 to 1700 00-04710011 3 (0 COOPER CAM LIFT STATION $4,475 12100 60 62100 60 62100 SS-0471105 4 (0) (16S'n UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR 6 N CORRECTION 6750 $715 6o 6715 60 6715 00-0471110 5 p0 (1007) CLEVELAND ST. SEWEIMCAN CREEK CROSSING 5246 to 1231 6231 1b 6231 TOTAL 1007-00 SEWER COLLECTION 67.006 63AN 6710 14.0ee 160 64.010 Sh0472-01 S (S) FaD EOUPMENT 10 63 63 60 W SS-0472-02 13 (!0 OFFICE EOUPM@IT S FURNITURE 60 N St 60 54 TOTAL 1607-!6 WASTEWATER ENGMEERMNG 1o 6o 64 k Io 00-ow -01 10 40 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT 1o 12 $2 6o 62 00-0401-05 10 (t) ANALYTICAL MOMENT UPGRADE to $12 612 so 612 00-0001..06 1 t m IOM Wrom I11TION MGMT SYSTEM 00 w $3 4o 64 SS-ONt -04 10 04 CHEMICAL C1SS4ETS tIO 64 µ 1 t 3 00-W.-OS 10 (A) LABORATORYEOUPMEVT i0 113 $13 00 112 00-0451-OS t 0 (10 LAB RENOVATION W $12 112 to TOTAL OW-00 WASTEWATER LABORATORY 60 p /4S 146 -so 60 43 $3 t0 63 00-0400-01 10 (T) DN "'mom RATION MGWT SYSTEM i0 612 N 2 60 412 0111-040111-ft 10 REMOTE MONTORS/G EQUIPMENT N M yL 10 E! 00-0400-OS 10 (iOWAPLINGEGUPMENT - 60 ste Sts b= TOTAL 1007-00 PRETREATMENT TOTAL1907-96 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 65000 5666 65,476 $so 16.026 4 r, 4 mom how 000 peUM *mW Wwm4 s,"A bmwow owoW Wiiwwl "-&W, 64-4 &---4 &A-A-4 U--4 bob" 16how Oba" 1997-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 6114,016 16:40 WASTE WATER UTILITIES ZO?AE: TOTAL TOTAL C$TY ' ^ rl014D 4CURRElf C11Y , Ail)-M1 PMCALYEA$4 AlAh" COST rAND REVENIA FUNOM. COMM COST fiA 00-0451-01 IS (IQMISOBL NEOWOPMEEOWPMENT^RNiTURE i0 $10 $10 i0 NO TOTAL 1$06-0a WASTEWATERADON. 50 W $10 510 $0 $70 10-0170-01 1 (q FENCING $o Sao, Sao $o $30 so-0470--m i LIFT STATION SCAOA i0 422 $22 SO 422 00-4470-06 1 (N) SAMPLERS $0 $5 85 SO iS 50-0470-04 1 (a) PROCESS M+ROVEMENT so we an $o 1120 011-0470406 2 (8) W WTP UPGRADE - 21 MOD Si sit c 50 000 So 55 000 $o $6,000 TOTAL 1005-6a WATER RECLAMATION 614 40 54,000 565 WNS $0 So.%m 90-001-01 7 (a)ONE)MItEaEWERL m $400 SO $100 SO $100 M-0471-08 0 (0)SEWER TAPS $o to $o $60 m 99-0471-04 a (0) D4 8"VENT PLAN SEWER4INES $0 $250 mi $0 $230 99-0471-06 4 (q (1005) L*GAADE INTERCEPTOR a N COW*C71ON $760 $0 $35 $a6 so $36 0-0471-00 a (q INPRTRATION NPLOW INVESTIGATION 6200 $o $200 $o $400 00-0471-07 0 (IOMWIOLERENASRlTAT10N $0 $160 $150 $0 $ISO 10-0471-06 5 (p FIELD SERVICE SANLTARY SEWER REPLACEMENT so Sao 150 $o $50 00-0471-10 5 (q (1000) REPLACE SEWER LINES am am so $w 0-0471J06 4 (M (10" UPGRADE WEROEPTOR 6 N CORRECTION $7S0 $715 so $716 so $715 00-0471 KI C 5 (R) (150% REPLACE SEWER LINES $714 so5670 $a" so we VOTALIM-06 SEWER COLLECTION 52,541 $1,015 61,104 $2.200 $60 $2,250 W-0472-01 0 n RD EOUIPMENTT $0 $a Sa $0 $3 06-0471-02 13 (ld OFFICE ECUiMENT a FURNITIAM $0 $1 $1 $0 $1 TOTAL III6-IS WASTEWATERENGINEEAINO 5o 60 $4 N M-0481-01 10 (T) ICPVANISION SPECTROMETER to 72 $72 W $72 TOTAL 1006-00 WASTEWATER LABORATORY so $o $72 $72 10 $72 96-0403-01 10 (T) ICP EMI MON SPECTROMETER 6o 416 ills $0 616_ TOTAL 1000-I6 WASTEWATER LABORATORY $o W $7s i15 s0 $is 460 66,448 TOTAL 1066-60 WASTEWATER DERARTMENT 610.554 $7,015 $f Ala "No. O. °d S F N 1997-01 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PLAN Lyl6lfets:46 WASTIE WATER 17TIunce TOTAL' TOTAL TOTAL Mp F CITY 00N6 AUMEMf CMTY A10-1141 . FACALYMA NITII0EIM OA eff% T NAME OO&f FUND -vmma COkSTR COST 00-0481-01 4S (FQMISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EOUIPMENT/FUIWRURE t0 $1 it 60 $1 TOTAL 19M-1000WASTEWATER ADMIL 60 $0 $1 51 SO $t i t 00-NTO-01 1 (Ip F04CM so WO $30 $0 IV 00-0470-02 S (T) LIFT STATION SCAM 6o $1f $to 6o 61f 00-0470-05 1 (8) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT $28 60 628 $28 $o $26 00-0470-04 1 (S) LIFT STATION REWN 64 6o $4 64 SO 94 00-0470106 2 WWTP UPGRADE - 21 MOD $1%000 60 o00 6o 60 o00 6o 66,900 TOTAL 1MB-2000 WATER RECLAMATION 616,972 66,000 $61 UAW 6o 60,061 F 00-0471-01 7 (0) OVEFWZE SEWER LINES $too so $100 so 6100 00-0471-00 9 (0) SEWER TAPS 60 60 M 660 660 00-0471-04 8 (G) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES 6o 6250 $260 $0 $260 00-0471-05 4 (4 0004 UPGRADE MVTEROEP70R i N OOFMCTION 6750 636 60 106 $0 9" 00-0471-07 8 (11) MANHOLE IMPROVEMENT 60 $160 M SO $0 fl 00-0471-08 5 (R) FIELD SERVICE SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT 6o $50 660 $o $50 00-0471-10 5 (Iq (2000) REPLACE SEWER LINES SSW $0 630 $80 so ~ 00-04X1 4 (41008 UPGRADE INTECEPTOR & N CORRECTION 6780 b $716 6713 $0 67tS 00-0471 KIO 5 {ID (168" REPLACE $EWER UNES SSW- 60 $300 6300 60 Saw TOTAL 1086-1000 SEWER COLLECTION $2,160 6135 $1,405 $1.00 $50 61.060 00-0472--01 8 (8) FIELD EQUIPMENT 6o $3 $3 60 $3 00-0472-02 13 (R) OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE 60 61 $I $0 $1 00-0472-08 12 (T) OFFICE MACHINES to $5 60 $0 $5 TOTAL 1888-$000 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING so 6o 60 60 6o $o 00-0481-01 12 (1) ON INFORMATION MOW SYSTEM 60 $2 62 to $2 00-0481-02 10 M H.P. LIOUIO CH110MATOGRAPH 636 60 NS $o f38 00-0481-06 14 (8) WATERSHED MONITORING $0 $12 $12 $0 $12 TOTAL Im-2000WASTEWATER LASORATORY $0 $M $14 482 $0 $62 00-0486-01 10 (n REMOTE MONITORING EQLV% ENT 6o $10 $10 $0 110 00-OW-09 10 PMTMATM MT$AMVIMOMAFETY EQUIPMENT 6o 18 f8 to $0 00-044-M 13 (T) DIV 8uw~TION M OWT SYSTEM _ b N $3 so 612 63 TOTAL ISM-2000 PRETREATMENT to 60 ~ 622 to TOTAL 1990-2000 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT $15,238 60,+73 61,622 671706 S50 $7,845 M F I~ am Sd1N ow um mom Saw" mm MITI ~ S>~ Y 1997-01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 6/10/88 16=40 WASTE WATM UTMMES fOYAIS " TOTAL TOTAL pmr' 166ikI C-w" cm AD-IN pSCA1 YEAf1 FUN T fA 014646 MAW 01-0461-01 13 (FomacELLANWWOFFICE EQUIPASNTIRJRwruFtE SO $1 so 60 61 TOTAL 2000-20CKWASTEWATER ADMN. 59 $0 N SI 9o ST 01-0170-01 1 (T) TOMMEL SCREEN $180 So $160 51 So 90 $190 01-0470-OS 1 (T) COVERED STORAGE FACILITY 950 $0 590 $50 50 $30 01-0470-08 1 (R) ROAD PAVNO $S0 SO SSO SS0 50 S30 TOTAL 2000-2001WATER RECLAMATION 7250 SO 1299 5280 9c 5280 01-0471-01 7 (G) OVERSIZE SEWER LINES 6100 So $100 90 $100 01-0471-06 9 (0)SEWER TAPS 90 $0 60 $50 $60 C1-0171-04 6 (0) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LNES 90 5250 5260 90 $250 01-0471-06 4 (1001) UPGRADE 94TERCEPTOR 5750 $50 80 Sso so $50 01-0471-07 a (R) MANHOLEWRIIOVEMENT So $150 4190 50 $150 01-0471-06 5 (114 FIELD SERVICE SMITAAY SEWER REPLACEMENT So 560 S60 So $30 01-0471-10 9 (R) REPLACE SEWERLNES SS50 So ow $300 $0 ON 01-0471-11 9 (p (2001) REPLACE SEWERLNES 01-0471 LOS 4 (12000 UPGRADE 61TERCEPTOR 6 NFLTRATOOWNFLOW 9760 67 so 16 W 57 513 W $715 TOTAL 2000-2001 SEWER COLLECTION $2,190 9666 5790 $1,845 Sw S1,095 01-0472-01 9 (9) PADEOUIPMENT 90 63 $S So $3 Ot-0472-02 1S (II) OFFICE EQUIPMENT 6 FURNRURE 41 91 $4 9o $1 Of-0KM-08 12 M OFFICE MACHOOES SO 0 $S SO TOTAL 2000-2001 WASTEWATER ENGNEEFOA 41 So so so W W-0481-01 10 4% LABORATORY DATA PROTECTION so 0 so so 01-0411-02 14 (t4 LAD2QUIPMENT $2so so SS so is 5 50 525 to $is 01- "I -08 10 (44 LAS CASEWORK 25 $41 so S2 Ot •-0481-04 12 (T) ON INFO MGMT SYS 544 TOTAL2OW-2001 WASTEWATER LABORATORY So R2S 519 SM 10 01-0485-01 15 (T) ON NFORIMTRON MOW SYSTEM 5o se 04 $a 41 01-0411-02 12 (3) LANDFM.L MONITONNO EOUrMIE4T So $14 914 9o Sl4 TOTALS000-11M PRETiEATMENT So 90 522 622 _ TOTAL9000-2001 WASTEWATERDEPARTMEI4T 1 1 1 E o,1 1687-2000 GRAND TOTAL -%ASTEWATER 599A97 522A81 MAW 928,893 5250 Sam it SOLID WALSTE {A 65 N T y, tt~ ~ II~ II~ t1III~ tlltltlll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~A ~ ~ 1997 - 2001 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH REQUIREMENT SOLID WASTE (S X 1000) x> pip ~%18S1GNMENT a 1997 1998 - .1 2000 200.1 T47AL " NUMaERS' CATEGORY 1 COMMUNICATIONSEQUIPMENT $10 $0 $0 so $0 $10 2 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $122 $26 $5 $2 $0 $151 3 OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT $22 $11 $9 $6 $9 $59 4 REGULATORY REQUIREMENT $546 $83o $83 $0 $45 $1,303 5 CONTAINER IMPROVEMENTSAIPGRADES $180 $175 $170 $175 $180 $860 6 EXISTING LANDFILL CONSTRUCTION $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 7 LANDFILL EXPANSION-PROPERTY $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 8 LANDFILL EXPANSION-PERMITTING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 9 LANDFILL EXPANSION-CONSTRUCTION $3,231 $90 $700 $2,296 $45 $6,351 10 RECYCLING SITE ADDITIONS $200 $50 $0 $0 $0 $250 11 RECYCLING SITE IMPROVEMENTS $33 $1,887 $15 $16 $15 $1,986 12 RECYCLING EQUIPMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 13 MISCELLANEOUS $63 $2 $6 $3 $253 $327 $6,398 $2,870 $988 $2,488 5547 $12,279 **GROUP ASSIGNMENT (GA) NUMBERS we usod for IdsnWatlon of COP pmjw is by n*or c4doM of wgmw. o. 31 Y 'f1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SOLD WASTE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL MAO~iECT' Pw Am 00T1o ;cUo TdfT ' . CITY FkG1LYEAR NAME Opel FLITLO Fe?VB+uE PLMDNO c7Tt1E1t cow 07-oew-o1 5 (11 MtsCE. OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT to 62 $2 W 62 97-atop-0e 2 (T) Lw)E. COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE so 9o to to 0 s7-0900-0 Is (IOFFICEPlEMODEUw to is 63 to ss TOTAL 100-07 SW ADM MTRATION 9o $13 913 to 913 f7-0901-01 2 (tp MMSCELLANEOU9 OFFICE EQUIPMENT to 64 $4 W 94 07-001-0e 2 PA WOUL►NEOUS COMPUTER NARDWARFJSOFTWARE so a $a to 96 07-OW-03 2 (TO ROUTE AUTOMATION to 1125 925 $0 926 TOTAL 19th-117 eW RE ODffML to 954 NA to ts4 97-ow-ot 1 (N) COM uw-ATION 9o so $6 to tb 117-060e-0e 5 (4 OUM PSTER ec1ASNM to to a to 95 117-090e-08 1s Aq oomw icmFAaurY wwRovEMVm so Sm $a $0 $36 97-OW-04 5 n 11EwA*XW ND OUM FITERS to $6 65 to 116 W-0ow-011 5 MA REPLACE M *CELLANEOUS DUMPSTEM 90 S76 975 $is 1160 07-ot0e-06 2 (111 WORK(ORDNS AUTOMATION 9o 920 920 to 920 97-OM-07 15 (p M*CQJLA&lOUt TOOL& AND Ea1IPM EXT to 1190 915 to 9~ 07-01169-011 2 (M MmCBjANEOU9 COMPUTA HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE to to a to 9is 97-01100-ce Rom AUTOMATION! to 9 1147 to 117-0,011-1o 1s (MVEMICLEO MPOWT 110 $7 a 117 !0 117 97-011011-11 18 (!O maegUANEOUS OFFICE EOUPME'KTAND FURmTURE so 116 63 so t' 97-CM-12 2 ("M ROUTE DATA OOLECTIONOYSTEM $0 Ns 91s $0 91s ToTAL 11196-97 tW COMMERCIAL to 92s7 Fm 976 $5122 07-011011-o1 7 p PNOPERTYACOUMTTION FOR LANDFILL V 231 to ts, to to 111Aoo ET-0906102 2 (M M44E I LANDFILL CONSTRUCTION e• ~s1 3ml esl t to to t~peo 97-OW-05 4 p) KW w ZONE 9260 to t2so ~ tzz6 90 1226 97-04011-a 4 (0) WATEw Lrd - M AYMU-sPO~cER TO EDWARDS $m to tso S to 11 5 a-0,011-at s (q MMCE,UWEOU6 OFFICE FuRINTURE AND EOUIPMENT 7o 110 ao so Sic n-owwo 4 (s1 METNANE0013aCTION SYSTEM :4,776 11,9 94,791 90 a,►t1 totAL sae-n ew a11POeAt so t, 111 to 9, 87-0104-0 S (!q MMSCl7 LANEOU9 OFFICE SUPPORT EOLAPMENT to 92 92 to 62 a-0011-a 11 (1REOYOLINO WE wrROVISMEWS to sm W-a11o4lor, 10 (a) PITERMmirg PRocusm COMA DE61oN soo ~ ~ to ts2 ST-ow-a t 1 (RIM +G 0014TA6mLe a p 92 9o $2 97-CM-08 1 m RAO" 9200 Sm 9266 110 62se TOTAL 1006-07 tW PrFCYCIFVO ToTAL 1 m-97 SOUD WASTE - 14M sm is - 1 F ~M ssr IMN i 1 N f~ Aft #Oi1 Iti1N I MA BMW Ono IIMi 111111111 ~ ~ IMI! 1907-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SOLD WASTE odown" ?`p i ~a 'N•: . T'pYjll. , ° tCTAL. TOTAL•:: *AVOW t$DaobT PIWCf MOHD CALYEAA Rim Eli" OTHER 7isOOesT r y r r r so-0100-01 s (R) W EL OFFICE SUPPORT EQLWMENT so $2 $4 s0 92 08-0100-02 2 (T) MISCELLANEOUS COMPVTERHAROWAREANDSOFTWARE so t4 $6 s0 iE q TOTAL1117-es $WAOMMMITPATION $0 $7 $7 so $7 90-0001-01 3 M MMCEL ANEOUB OFFYJ E EQWMEW W $2 12 so 62 $$-0101-02 2 (M¢ M ISCELL NAPA COMPUTER SOFTWARE w 12 1% 19 L TOTAL 1007-9$ sW RE6DENfl1L s0 $7 87 so 61 SS-O8oQ-01 1 (Ni" M ISOM MEOUS DUMPSTERS 00 $166 $I s6 s0 $16$ 96-0801-at 2 (N)MSSCELIANEOUS COMPUTER so $10 $10 so IIO 96-0008-06 S (K" MAWSTEA SCREDI M$ so ss $3 s0 $5 06-OON-04 13 (iq WSMIANEOU$ OFFICE FURNMJM so 92 92 $0 $2 TOTAL W-98 SW OOM MERVAL so 8172 $172 so s,72 010-0101-01 $ (R) MYICELLANEOUS OFFICE EOIAPIIEVIT/FURMfFURE so 55 $3 so 8/-0909-02 2 (Na LAP TOP COMPUTER so $6 $s so $6 s$-0101-os 6 (M MMSCEIIANEOUB DUMPSTERS so $i$ $16 so $15 88-05001011 4 (E) METHANE OOLLEOTION SYSTEIA Sm so moo so $610 a-am-0$ S (14 M ANTEIUNOE WALDWO $0 w w $0 wo TOTALIM-96 SW OI6POSAL $800 1116 $746 $0 $746 88-0804-01 11 0 FISCYCL NG WE my"OVEMENTS $o W $1$ so $15 N-0101-0t 10 1% ADOMOMAL FIECYOLI N0 $RES 90 w $60 $o 50 so-OS04-O8 S Al WCEL ANEOUS OFFICE SUPPORT EGLOWE 4T $0 02 $2 100-010484 11 Qs sITOWWATE PRCCES414 CENTER $1.701 s0 $1'M s0 $1. IM-0004-0$ 11 n TUB OPIINOER PAD O(TENSIONJWAUIS - $0 S90wo- $0 x,,010 TOTAL 1987-$$ EWFW41UM $1.782 $167 $1A08 W TOTAL1s87-96 SOUO WASTE 82.412 8438 1A 8TO 20 - g F V 'i r 1 v 0 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SOLD WASTE 14UL" TOTAL TOTAL PllOyliCf bOfiD OUft* NT CITY FWALVM FUND *lr4l* PJNDM COST OTHM N-oeo9-01 s MWEI.LANEOUII OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 10 tt 92 $o $2 TOTAL 1390-99 GW ADWOTPATION 9o M 92 to $2 i0-0101-01 3 (Fo MSC U04EOUS OFFICE EOUIPMENT/FU1WfiURE so $3 63 so $3 SS-ow-02 2 mMOCELUWEOUSCOVPUTERMARDWAIEANDSOFTWARE {0 46 $5 10 95 00-40M -03 f3 (R) MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS ANDEOUOMENT o0 64 64 so $4 TOTAL 1333-90 SW RESIDENTIAL $0 $12 912 $0 $12 00-0900-01 6 (Fq DUMPSTER SCREENM $0 N N W Ss 90-0000-02 6 (WTI) MOCELiANEOV0 0OMP8TER3 so 1106 ties 10 $105 00-N02-06 13 (p MNCELLANE" FURNITURE AND EOLW ENT 90 $2 92 $0 TOTALING-90 SWCOMMLERCSAL so $172 $172 19 9172 N-0300-01 3 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE FURNITURE AND EOUIPMENT 90 $2 $2 so 92 ~ $m so 920 00-0906-02 4 (N) FUEL TANK REVENTMENT GO N 130 sw 930 W N-NOS-OS 4 (R) REPLACE FUEL TANK ~ sm $0 $33 $p sm $0 1700 90-OS00-Or 4 (M) DOOR CONTROL MTEM so 90-00001006 9 (0) LANDFILL EXC:AYATIOWOLIALTTY CONTROL 9 $no ! o $7N so $706 TOTAL ION-00 SW OISPOGAL 90 $f6 {58 W 146 N-0001-01 I I p PSCYC404 SITE OAPRMMENTS $2 $2 so $2 90-ow-02 3 (W MOCUTAME04A OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT $0 117 9$2 t0 $2 TOTAL ION-90 SW RWYOUNO 6799 soN :a ToTAL1SN-N 6000 WASTE b iiiiinciiii 1mIiiiiiiIi r mimimill NommIl own 1~o VA" Irr4 Mrrl basso OUSE" 6100fill Now WW 1"7-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SOLD WASTE TOTAL ' T~O~TA/L + TOTAL ' PROdBCT . • 9010 ~ CtM~IfT r N I ■ ',~1~ PMDJECTNAMS OOOT RINp pMNDbL01 OT11ti1 s. 00-am-Im 0 (1 M16CELLANEOU6 OFFICE EOUPMENTMA NITURE 60 12 92 10 82 TOTAL 1991-00 SW ADMI ATRATION so 12 62 so $2 00-0901-01 S M MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EOMPMENTIFURNITURE b a $2 10 $2 TOTAL 1999-00 SW RES'OENTIA 10 12 12 90 92 00-0901-01 116 (Iq LMBCELLANE" OFFICE EQL*%I rfT^*WTURE 10 93 63 10 lu 00-0101-09 a K" MISCELLANEOUS DUMPSTERS 10 1170 9170 to It70 00-0900-08 a (119 DUMPSTER SMENINO 10 99 0 10 65 00-OM-04 2 (1111 MISCELLANEOUS SOFTWARE b 12 12 so 92 TOTAL 1190-00 SW COMMERCIAL 10 111) 11110 1o 1150 00-0108-01 S (FV MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EO MAENTPIUM(TUAE 90 92 12 W 32 00-08001011 9 (0) PHASE 12A. LANDFILL CONSTRUCTIDN 92 00 $0 SUM 90 MM 00-0900-06 9 0 KISL1C DISPOSAL AREA so Sw so 9o sm 00-0109-04 9 (1) PARWA LOT UPROVEMOM 10 930 Sw 10 m 00-0909-05 9 (1 SCALE HOUSE 0MVIOVEMENTS 90 820 S20 90 120 TOTAL 1191-00 SW LANOFIL.L 52.200 967 92W 00 92.211 00-0904-01 11 0 RECYCLNQ SITE 111PROIIEMENTM 1Q 116 Ili s 9o 810 00-0804-01 S (R) MIBCQLMEOLIS OFFICE SUPPORT EOUPMENT 1Q 92 92 9a 92 TOTAL11/9-00 SWRECYCUNO 99 N7 117 90 1017 TOTAL 1111-00 SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT _ 200 x.116 I v V r- t 1597-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SOLD WASTE ow7119 MAL Y T&AL' TOTAL PIIWrC1' in"ln sow OtIR11 tT' OITY FllGY YEM NIAllm, 9A_ PftW NAME 01-0100-01 3 (q MISCEliMMA OFFICE SUPPORT EOWMENT 10 62 12 60 12 01-0100-02 13 (14) SOLE) WASTE OFFICE CONSOLIDATION 10 646 $46 60 PIS TOTAL2000-0t SWAO MA6TRAT10N 1o $47 $47 $0 647 01-0101-01 3 (FI) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT W 93 93 60 $3 01-MI -02 13 (N) SOLID WASTE OFFICE CONSOUMTION /0 686 686 10 685 TOTAL2000-01 SW AESV04TML 10 161 S!1 W "a Ot-0902-01 IS (!b MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EMOVEW to 63 $3 so 93 01-0101-OQ S K" MISCELLANEOUS MWOTEM $0 $176 $175 W $175 01-0902-03 5 (9 DUMPSTER SCAEDIM 60 65 $5 60 65 01-0002-04 13 (N) SOLID WASTE OFFICE CONSOLIDATION i0 me S86 10 185 TOTAL2000-Ot SWOOMMEACIAL 10 6288 8298 W 6296 01-0103-01 3 (Ip MMCEU ANEOUS OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 60 92 62 60 $2 01-0106-02 4 (F4) W1iAIDOUSCMEMCALSTORM4E 10 w S46 b 645 01-OON-05 9 (FQ MISCELLANEOU MWOTEM 10 616 615 10 613 01-OM-04 9 (M COYER FOR K0JC DISPOSAL MEA 10 m 630 10 w TOTAL2000-01 SWOOPOSAL 10 602 6!9 60 102 01-0104-01 11 (A RECYCLNOSITE AVROYEMENTS 619 N5 10 915 Ot-0101-02 3 (11) MOCEILANE09A OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 60 u $2 60 62 01-0101-0! 13 (1Q SOLID WASTE OFF" CONSOt"TION W _ W6 W WS TOTAL2000-01 SW RECYCUFIO 10 w 932 W 132 TO'TAL2000-01 SOUOWASTE W? 0647 s0 _J5 4L 1007-010RANOTOTAL-SOUDWASTE ltozee lt,g19 &ILM !73 11 270_ P r r r FLEET SERVICES ~ 73 G w ) 1MeR IIMI w" mm rr UI11ll Merl a" "m .dw mom a" ww wr! "084 6000 W" Now am" 1997 2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH REQUIREMENTS FLEET SERVICES (s x 1000) GROUP S o Sa; yY a,' i T 2001 TOTAL 2000 118SIrNMENT ;CATEGORY ,1„997 1998 t~LJIV~13ER3 ~ i 1,999 1 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $4 $2 $0 $0 $0 $6 2 OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 2 2 2 0 2 8 3 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 9 10 8 8 9 40 5 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE 11 23 0 0 0 34 6 FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 1,000 0 0 0 0 1008 $1034 $37 $8 se $11 $1,098 I "GROUP ASSIGNMENT (GA) NUMBERS are used for kIwAlkatfon d GP Projects by major category el aAWse. y V w F i4 r, V 1997-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FLEET SERVICES TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL >•?SO~iBCT 1wimem, OA ,~,PFIOJEZITWO: S;; < ; . PROJECT . $1510 ,CLUMEIfY : ~ CRY AIO-N , r OTHER 'PROJECT COST a-0660451 a moo TRLOOTNEWRLEETSERVICEC&ITER $1,000 m so $`IAOD so PAW $1,000 n-ONO-01 1 (R) PERSONAL COWLITER 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 91-06$0-02 4 (F) AIR- WACT WRENCH 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 87-0660-M 5 (T) EMIMION COMROL EOUIPMENT a 0 a a 0 0 a TOTAL ISM-97 FLEET SERVICES - VEHICLE MKT. $4 $0 $12 $1,012 so stow $1,012 07-0501-01 4 (IV CUTOFF SAW $4 10 $4 64 s0 $0 $4 97-0661-02 4 (R) WELDNO EOUIPMENT s o 3 s 0 o s TOTAL 19W-97 FLEET SERVICES - MACHINE ~ $7 to $7 $7 so so s7 07-CM-01 1 (P+ POSONALCOMPUTER $2 so $2 $2 so so $2 97-OW-02 2 OFFICE FURNITURE 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 97-OEM-r, (T) AUTOMATED PAL INVENTORY CONTROL a 0 a a o 0 1 97-065$-04 5 (8) OVERFILL PREVENTION FOR USTs a 0 s 3 0 0 3 TOTAL I ON-07 FLEET SERVICES - PARTS a FUEL $13 so $16 $15 so 10 $15 TOTAL 16$6-97 FLEET SERVICES 28 0 54 1,034 0 1.000 1,034 W-0010-01 2 (0) OFFICE FURNITURE $2 so $2 $2 so :o $2 08-0610-02 4 (fo SPECIALTY Tma 4 0 4 4 0 0 4 TOTAL 1x9T-9a FLEET SERVICES - VEHICLE MANT. M 10 s5 so so so $0 90-06x1-01 4 R CHOP SAW $3 s0 $3 $3 $0 $0 ss 90-0681-02 4 m NANO TOOLS s 0 3 3 0 0 TOTAL 1197-10 FLEET SERVICES - MACHINE SHOP M so $8 $a so $0 $a i 9$-068$-01 1 (ft PUDONALCOMPVTER $2 0 2 2 0 0 2 M-06M-02 5 (S) CATH0010 PROTECTION FOR USTs 21 0 29 211 0 0 23 TOTAL IWf-M FLEET SUM= - PMTS R Fre. so so taa so p aD ~ W TOTAL 1997-M FLEET SERVICES $s7 W $$7 $s7 9D 9x-ow-o1 2 (0) OFFICE FURNITURE M $0 62 $ soo p S 9x-OW-02 4 (FtSPECIALTY TOOLS $ 0 3 sa TOTAL 1995-99 FLEET SERVICES - V841CLE MANT. 65 so 94 M so $0 M . c {1 tr e li.l fi Y I111II I~ ll~ fly ON" MGM "m No ~ mom mm" Iraq ow" am" No" "m 1097-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FLEET SERVICES TOTAL a' PlblBgT r1rQJBCT lOND TOTAL OA ' Ppq IE CT AyE' i T c" , " , N OTHE11 . PAOdECT i a. s COST 90-0501-01 4 pp SPEC1ALTV TOOLS $3 a a $3 so so $3 TOTAL IM-90 FLEET SERVICES - MACHM SHOP - so 0o $3 $s so so $3 s TOTAL 1005-99 FLEET SERVICES s5 So so se 0o so $8 00-Oleo-02 s (R) SPWIALTY TOOLS R+ $o $3 $9 $0 so $3 TOTAL 1000-2000 FLEET BERMES - VEHICLE MAP1T. p so 13 $3 so so $a 00-0501-01 s (I) WIRE WELDER _ 63 00 s, N so so 93 TOTAL 1955- 2000 FLEET SERVICES - MACHNE 8•IOP $3 so 05 $3 so so $3 TOTAL 1099-2000 FLEET SERVICES so q se i6 so so 66 01-0050-02 4 (M BMIALTY TOOLS s0 so is is m so so TOTAL 2000-2001 FLEET SERVCES - VEHICLE MAINT. so so is IS $0 60 s5 o1-0501-01 s n WELONO EGU MENT ts so ss $3 so 0o $3 TOTAL 2000-2001 FLEET SERMES - MACHNE SHOP ss so $3 63 so $0 93 01-0555-01 2 (110 OFFICEFURNMAE $2 0 2 2 0 0 2 TOTAL 2000-2001 FLEET SERVICES - PARIS A FUEL so $0 62 $2 i0 t0 S2 TOTAL SM-200, FLEET SERVICES so so $11 $11 so so i WAND TOTAL IW7-2M FLEET SERVICE, $05 so 06 $1.000 so $1.000 $1.096 r 4 G i Handout to Council 6.18-96 OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL JUDGE MEMORANDUM THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL TO: FROM: ROBIN A. RAMSAY DATE: JUNE 18, 1996 RE: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGES (REVISED - 6:30 p.m.) As the members of the Council are aware, the Denton Municipal Court currently has only one presiding judge, that being myself, and one assistant judge, Ms. Tanya Cooper. As of this date the position of Part-time Municipal Court Judge, a minimum twenty (20) hour position, has not been filled. Until such time as the current needs of the Municipal Court have been evaluated, the twenty hour part-time position will not be rifled. It is my hope as presiding judge that the needs of the Court can be met efficiently with the least possible people while still improving the efficiency of the Court. In short, until a need can clearly be defined, the part-time position will not be rdled. However, there still exists a need for assistant judges who can be available on relatively short notice in addition to scheduled court dockets. In fact, it is the Court's feeling that at least two persons could be appointed in order to assure constant availability and redundancy in the event of conflict. These assistant judges would therefore be serving in more of an "alternate or substitute" capacity. In February 1996, the Human Resources Department posted advertisements In the Dallas Morning News, the Fort Worth Star Telegram and the Denton Record Chronicle. In response to these advertisements, Human Resources received over 30 applications in the form of resumes or %itae. Of the responses, Human Resources then eliminated a few of the applicants who did not meet the required criteria, those being primarily that the applicants possess a license with the State Bar of Texas and that they have at least two years of legal experience. The resumes of the remaining applicants were then forwarded to the Municipal Judge's office for review. After review, and upon advise of the Human Resources, starting in May, I personally spoke by telephone with the remaining applicants who could be reached by telephone or bad provided current telephone numbers. The questions posed to each candidate are provided on the attached telephone questionnaire. c ,t s a Based upon the resumes submitted and based upon the telephone interviews, the Court, together with a representative of Human Resources narrowed the candidates to seven ('n, with much of the determination based upon flexibility, geographical availability and prior judicial experience. A committee was then formed, consisting of myself, Cay McSpedden, Debra Rose and Stephanie Berry of the City Attorney's Office. Personal interviews were scheduled for each of the seven finalists. Each Interview was approximately one hour in length and emphasized the requirements of flexibility and availabflity with Inquiry as to prior municipal court experience and any potential conflicts that may exist for any of the candidates. The seven finalist candidates were Greg Bertrand, J. E. Brownlee, Kimberly Cawley, James W. Coleson, David D. Garcia, Brian S. Holman and Eariean Murphy. While each of the candidates demonstrated more than ample ability, several of the candidates expressed some hesitation in regards to these positions as they do not provide any guarantees as to scheduled hours, and therefore have no guaranteed income. As several would have to decline criminal representation in order to accept this position, a few of the candidates indicated that without such a monetary guarantee, they would hesitate In accepting these positions. A few of the other candidates, while possessing excellent legal skills, did not have prior judicial experience and inasmuch as they would require specific training with no consistent practice, they too were eliminated. Eventually, the committee felt comfortable, based upon availability and experience, that at least three of the candidates were very well suited for these positions. The Committee felt quite confident that these three candidates also possess the kind of personalities that would mold well with the current court system and that their personalities would enable them to make a smooth transition into our system. Once the committee had an opportunity to meet and suggestion made, the Court than conferred with members of the Municipal Court Committee to obtain continents and suggestions as to the manner to proceed and the candidates to be recommended. Personal references were contacted as to those candidates to be submitted to council. After further discussion with the members of the City Council and after a review of the available hours which can be allotted to multiple positions, I can recommend that the Council appoint three persons to serve as assistant Municipal Court judges for the City of Denton. I can assure the Council that I will try in all ways possible, attempt to assign times and schedules which are as evenly allocated as possible, taking into consideration the "as needed" requirements of the positions. It should be rectgnized that, while the total number of hours performed by each judge may be somewhat lighter, the overall goals of flexibility, availability and redundancy will be achieved. As all of these individuals have indicated their willingness to undertake the position with this "as needed" condition In mind, this option may present the best solution for the Municipal Court's needs. r!Sr`yE• r[tq ;*1 4Accordingly, it is my pleasure to recommend to you the following persons (listed alphabetically) for appointment to the positions of Assistant Municipal Court Judges for the City of Denton: Ms. Kimberly Cawley (resume attached) and Mr. David Garcia (resume attached) and Ms. Earlean Murphy (resume attached) Respectfully Submitted, o In A. R Municipal e Denton Muni Court No. 1 I r t t C TRLRPRONR INTBAVIRN APPLICANT NAM DATZ OF TRLRPRONR INTRRVIM TRLRPRONR Nmn CONTACTU 1. What would you consider to be your primary area of practice currently? 2. Where do you feel you spend most of your daytime hours - Geographically? 1 3. How many court appearances do you have on an average week? Where are these appearances? (Dallas Co. Tarrant Co., Denton Co. ect.) 4. Do you feel you would be available on short notice to serve as judge for the City of Denton in the event of illness or unavoidable absence of the presiding judge? 5. If so, how much time, on an average work day, would you require, to be able to appear on short notice? I 6. Do you currently serve as judge for any other municipalities or courts? If so, which Courts and what days and times are you scheduled to serve? i Telephone Interview Page 1 a( r )`G l n v 7, The City and Court are currently considering that this position would be scheduled NOT as a minimum of Twenty (20) hours per week, but rather a maximum of 10 -15 hours per week and that scheduling would be on an "as needed" basis only. If the city makes a decision to do this would you still be interested in this position? (Keep in mind there would accordingly, be no "beneffts package) 8. Would you be available to serve as magistrate on weekends or holidays? If so, how many weekends or holidays would you be willing to serve? 9. What experience have you had specifically with municipal court law, either as Judge, prosecutor or defense attorney? If no municipal experience, how do you feel municipal courts might be different from other county and district courts? 10. What do you feel is a municipal court's purpose? - 11. Why are you interested in this job? { Telephone Interview Page 2 L x KfMBERLYA. CA *MY 120 Sleepy Holbw Highland Villate, TX 75067 (h) 214/317-2102 (w)214/436.1SSS EdRUA i St. MUY's Wv*r*Ity 8ahool of Law, San Antonio, To=s Doctor of Iurisp: udeoce - May 1993 Admitted to Texas Bar - November 1993 Dbdwr*Ity of Xortb rMos, Denton, Texas Bachelor of the Arts - English, French - August 1991 Dean's List Golden Key National Honor Society Gamma Beta Phi Nominee for Honors and Service Sigma Tau Ddu Nominee for English Honors Rhode Leland College, Protidence, Rhode Island 1985-1988 Dean's List Honor Society Secretary as a Freshman Honor Society President as a Sophomore Professional Eiperiensgi Alternate I&nicipal Court J~jdQe, Town of 7'1over )found, May 1995 to present Attorney.. Neiman i Barnes, L.L.P. August 1994 to present Solo Practitioner, Denton Courty,Texas November 1993 through August 1994 Undergraduate Experience: Research assistant, Professor Aloyalus Leopold, St, Marys University Fall 1992 through August 1993 Law clerk.. Neiman and Barnes, P. C. Summer 1990 through Summer 1993 Intern, Bexar County District Attorney's office, Fall 1991 through Summer 1992 i I ~r M XCalft,e.2of2 Volunteer Agbdft 'Habitat for Humanity, Board of Directors 'West Texas Legal Services In-service Provider 'Christian Community Action Pro Bono Attorney 'Child Advocacy of San Antonio, acting ad litem for abused and neglected children 'Big Brothers and Sisten program Related Training: 'Moot Court Competitor ' Wesd,aw and Lexis Training 'CD ROM Research Training Other Intetnts: Running and fitness, racquetball, reading Referenc-a.: Donna Shannon, Municipal Court Coordinator, Flower Mound 2121 Cross Timbers, Flower Mound, Texas 75028; 214/539-6006 Linda Steele. Municipal Court Coordinator, Lewisville 1197 W. Main, P.O. Box 29901)2, Lewisville, Texas 75067; 214/436-1558 Rose Chavez, City Secretary, Sanger P.O. Box 578, Sanger, Texas 76226; 817/458-7930 Other References Available Upon Request r' S( 1 • 1 David D. Garcia Attorney at Law 1200 W. University, Suite 150 Denton, Texas 76201 817-387-9555 Qualifications Licensed to practice law in Texas on November 2, 1984; Assistant Municipal Court Judge, Denton, 1986; Member: Denton County Bar Association; College of the State Bar of Taws; Texas Trial Lawyers Association; Texas Young Lawyers Aseociation (Selected to serve on the Ethics Committee 1993.1994). Also admitted to practice before U.S. District Court, Northern, Eastern, and Western Districts of Texas. Education Texas Tech University, 1977.1981 Lubbock, Texas B. A. in Psychology University of Texas, 1981.1984 Austin, Texas Doctor of Jurisprudence Emplonnent History Associate Attorney Don I. Windle, P.C. 1985/1986 Denton, Texas Associate Attorney Michael J. Whitten, P.C. 1986/1992 Denton, Texas Partner Milner, Walters & Garcia, P.C. 1993/1994 Denton, Texas Managing Partner Kern & Garcia, P.C. 1994/1995 Denton, Dallas & El Paso, Texas Owner Law Offices of David D. Garcia, P.C. Currently Denton, Texas Civic Activities Member: Board of Directors Denton County Friends of the Family, 1987- 1995; Denton Chamber of Commerce; Denton Benefit League; Denton Arts Guiid; Denton Community Theater; Board of Directors Denton Boy's Baseball inc., 1995- present. Volunteer baseball coach for YMCA and Denton Boy's Baseball Inc. 1994-present. Sunday School teacher Denton Bible Church. y 5 4 lot EARLEAN C. MURPIf~i'~" 71 Attorney at Law 509 Ranch ~ft 2H #1 67 LICENSES The United States Supreme Court, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States District Courts Northern, Eastern and Western Divisions of Texas and Northern District of Illinois. Licensed in the States of Illinois and Texas EXPERIENCE 1995 - Present DIRECTOR OF LITIGATION, West Texas Legal Services, Inc,, (A federally-funded legal service organization providing civil legal services to the poor). As an integral part of central administration, responsible for overseeing and assisting in the litigation efforts and training of approximately 47 attorneys. 1987- 1994 MANAGING ATTORNEY, West Texas Legal Services, Inc. Fort Worth and Denton Texas offices. Supervised and managed the organization's largest of 10 offices. Directly responsible for first line supervision of a staff of 25. Worked closely with Executive Director to reorganize the office and put into place various office procedures and systems to help deliver legal services more efficiently to the poor. 1986. 1987 MANAGING ATTORNEY, Hyatt Legal Services, Fort Worth area. (A for-profit nation-wide law firm). Handled family law, bankruptcies, social security incorporations, adoptions and criminal cases. Supervised and managed fun's largest office. 1984 - 1986 PRIVATE PRACTICE, Earlean C. Murphy and Associates, 1976- 1983 Chicago and Harvey, Illinois. Set up and organized office; developed business. Handled various cases including the closing and clearing of all legal problems for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development on their respective properties. 1983- 1984 ENFORCEMENT ATTORNEY, Secretary of State Securities Division, Chicago, Illinois 1980- 1982 ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, Chicago State University Business Law (part-time) 1975 JUDICL41 INTERNSHIP, Judge Albert Porter, Criminal Courts, Chicago, Illinois t ti 1970 - 1975 TEACHER, Chicago Board of Education, Chicago, Illinois Full-time position while attending law school during the even'.ng. EDUCATION Juris Doctor DePaul University College of Law, Chicago, Illinois, 1976. Bachelor of Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois, 1970. Sciem Graduated Cum Laude - Business Education Amclate of Thornton Community College, South Holland, Illinois, 1969. Arta Graduated with honors - Business/Accounting HONORS One of the first ten recipients of a Legal Opportunity Scholarship, 1970. Who's Who of American Women (1981 - 1992) Who's Who in the Midwest (1985 - 1986) PROFESSIONAL American Bar Association SOCIETEE.S State Bar of Texas (Family Law Section) State Bar of Texas Mentoring Committee (1992-1995) Denton County Bar Association (1987-1992) Board of Directors (1989-1991) College of the State Bar of Texas (1991-1995) Tarrant County Bar Association 1993 Black Women Bar Association 1993 CIVIC Advisory Council, Fred Moore Day Care Center (1988-1992) NAACP (1988.1992) Board of Direetors,Cook County Legal Assistance Foundation (1983-1986) Chicago Urban League (1983-1986) Board of Directors, So.Suburban Health Systems (1977.1979) REFERENCES Furnished upon request Resumf of Eartean C. Murphy