HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997
r ,:ems Ka
Q
Denton Municipal Utilities
Annual Report 1997
( - -.tj 0 32x 10
.
w ,
t+ ' ' `tl x rt e ~
Denton Municipal Utilities
} Annual Report 1997
1 V! t~ I
The Eleotrlo UtIlii "Energizing tomorrow's
community todayl"
a.
D€D€// r,v
-0V SfO+ ' rn~ ~I
.d r; ' ,.••.di The Water Utility."quality water, abundant
~..l : sources & excellence in serv{oel
The Wastewater Utlllty,''Commlttedtothe
stewardship of clean water for the futurel"
i
i , j 1D •
l ,r
r rl
Solid Waste t)apartments"15fflclent service, oost
„ competitive & environmentally responslblel"
[N 4111= 32 X
d
r,>
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEMBERS
~ i
l
Qeorge Hopkins, Chairman, serving on the Board since 1994
E,
i t A
Vi 1
i i Bill Glass, Vioe•Chairman, serving on the Board since 1992
}
Dick Norton, Secretary, serving on the Board since 1998
Bob Coplen, serving on the Board since 1991
M ~ Q ~
Charldean Newell, serving on the Board since 1997
t3
MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOQ:,RD
u
The Management t * '
Study provided `V
reoommendatlons
that will be
combined with
Uxlsting goals and
strrAtegles to form
tho Utilities' Vision
for the Future."
The year 1997 hrought many new, exciting, and difficult challenges to public Utilities Board Chalrntan
the Board and Staff. The electric iadnswy continues to move closer to George Hopkins, atoirg with
retail wheeling, We are aggressively exploring options which will Board menibers Bill Giese, Dick
permit Denton to he competitive in a deregulated market. The Issue Norton, Bob Coplen and
ot'siranded investment recoacry, the most 1111portant Issue associated Charldcdn Newell, help set the
with deregulation, has a major Impact oil Electric plAnnhtg activities, policies and goals, guiding the
Utilities 11110 the future.
A key Solid Waste milestone was reached when (lie Texas Natural
Resources Contscrvation Commission officially awarded a permit to
expand the existing landfill. However, notch work remains to he done
iu the ucxt year to preparr tine site for actual operation. New options
for recycling waste nnaterial look prontising, lit terms of both waste
diversion and useful life of the landfill, "A word of tappreoiation for
the years of service rendered
I;fl'oris cornthme to streamline Water and Wastewater operations to the City Of 00hton by Robert
® make them more cost effective and conspetitive Willi other providers E. NelsOh who retired on
The need for new and expAnded treattneut facilities, while properly January 2, 1998. He was an
maintaining the existing infrastruciu,e-, presews planning challenges, outstanding leader. We look
forward to the leadership of
't'he results of the recent management study assured the Utilities It Is Howard Martin who has been
well managed and fully capable of serving theiteeds of the community. named to replace him.'
• ' The recomnrettdations of the study, when combined with the existing ~ • •
t. goals and strategies, form the Udlitles' Vision for the Future
yy/{\I'W/~/~/M ~r
,twr' H~tat~hlA
George Hopkins
1
,
cir
1
1
MESSAGE FROM THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER OF UTILITIES
a
Ft Fn
"The flnanclal
` strength of each
Utility [department
Improved In 1997,'
5-'
[s
The Assistant City Manager of Flnanclal Goals reached or Exceeded and Every
Utilities, Howard Martin, Ufility Improved, Overall FInanclal Strength
provides leadership toy the five
utility departments • 1;lectric, Loch of the utility operations exeaeded the net Income goals despite
Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste lower than budgeted commodity sales, The combination of good ,k
411111 Fleet services. revenues and below budgeted expenses provided strong net income
performance for every organization. Solid Waste recorded revenues
significantly above projections, based primarily on greater commercial
volumes Revenues for the other utilities were close to budget,
although residential revenues were generally affected by greater than
normal rainfall and the stagnant recycling product market,
Pvery Utility closely managed costs and ended the year below budgeted
expenses, This enabled each utility to record above budget net Income
for 1997, and that continued a positive financial trend over the past
several years to Improve the Department's balance sheets, This
stronger financial position also allowed the Utilities to reserve a por-
"Timely moalpt of the tlon of fund balances for future use. The existing reserve strategy has
landfill permit was orltlool to Included specific reserve funds for rate stabilization, debt retirement,
the suooass of the landfill tank painting, landfill closure/post closure/development plan lines,
eXpan8lon projeot, emergency and working capital, In 1997, new reserve funds were
established to meet contingency and capital construction requirements, tp
1997 Management Study results Very Positive
The Utilitlas Depariment received a major review of Its overall
2 performance level by a management consulting firm retained to study
i,n s£Se 1y r
i 1 ' •Y
0
all aspects of utility management and operations, This Independent
review is required every 10 years by Denton's City Charter and reflects
the need to periodically reaffirm that the Department is providing
quality service to the community I ant pleased to report that the I
results of this review in 1997 were very positive,- A summary of the
key study findings are provided in a special section of this annual
report
Permit Received for Landfill Expanslon
A major accomplishment occurred in 1997 when the State of Texas j
issued it permit to expand the existing landfill site The elhttination of JI
file need for public hearings saved two very valuable resources
money and time. Major constructon will begin ht March 1998 and ?
while the schedule Is light, the first cell should be ready for operator
'is the existing site reaches fill capacity,
New Vehicle Maintenance Program Established
A new concept In vehicle malritcoanec was lntplentented by she piece
Services Department to improve service to the city's vehicle fleet, This
new concept is similar to the various "HMO" prograptst one annual
fee covers all of a division's normal maintenance requirements, The
intent is to improve preventative maintenance by removing the cost
associated with Individual maintenance events Departments will have
all incentive to receive the maxittltttn benefit for the lump sntn cost
dtcy incur, and the net result should be greater irreveuta6ve ntahlte-
Rance mud lower overall vehicle ntafnteuance costs,
l1
Marcy Challenges Ahead For Utilities Department
'there are signifleantissaes at hated or on the horizon that will have a The Utililies' public communica"
major Impact on utility operations In the future, The most significant lion progrcun was enhanced
issue is the likelihood of a deregulated electric market in the near through th. expansion of video
fulttre and [lie great uncertainty surrounding competitive market production and the addition of ID 0
9.; conditions, The Department has enlisted the aid of engineering and the new Cable TV "Utility
legal consultants to thoroughly study and analyze all potentlal options Updates" spot,
that will provide the best benefit for the citizens of Denton,
3
r ,
.2'nlyr b 3 l
b
0
t
I
MAJOR STUDY OF UTILITIES DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS CONDUCTED BY
MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRM
CITY OF DUTON
unicipal Utilities
anagement Studq '
~99~ "The study report
identifies several
critical findings."
BLACK & VEATCH
KFNIG Feel Manvlck
f
Much of 1997 wits spent on the Study Gives Utilities Department High Marks far
(hilities Management Sludy Ouallty Service
The final management study report has a recurring theme That
summarizes the on-going accomplishments of the Utilities Depart-
a mentt "quality service," livery major utility operation Is recognized for
achieving this primary customer service goal as evidenced by the
1!I following study report comments,
t
"System rellabillry and high levels of service are the foundation
"Tho rnanagomi}nt study
aonHrmad that the U}Iiltlos of the Electric Utility's operating effort," u
Dopartmont Is providing k
quality strrvloe to Its The Department as a whole Is highly conscious of the need to provide
trtt customers;' , a high level of customer service and of the community's expectations r
of a high quality of product and service, (Witer/Wasitwiter)
"Personnel In Solid Waste are dedicated and continually seek
ways to improve service levels and performance economy,"
4
Jy 't'r4(~hT } h. ! i it.~{~SK 1~'M~ _ _ .'I
j f ~s i l
• ~y~-r~~.~~~f~yL 1
v
c3
Key Report Findings Dooument Overall Strengths
of Utilities Department
The study report Identifies several "critical findings" confirming that
Denton's programs, practices, policies and procedures are more "City Charter requires
detailed, more professional, and more proactive than many other an Independent
utility organizations' management study
every 10 years,"
" OMU Is a well-run municipal utility with a record of success
planning for its longterm resource requirements,"
"I)MU has attracted highly qualified and skilled employees and has
Invested hl its "human capital" to ensure quality performance,"
" t)MU has developed and Implemented excellent planning,
analydcnl and ntanagelnent tools."
"Mitt has been proactive ill optimizing most of Its utility
processes and III reducing or containlag operational costs."
"As it result of comprehensive imerviews, analysis, and
benchnlarking, the consultants consider I)MU to be cotupethive
In most areas In the cllvirolllllent III which it must exist." F".
Study Supports Future Utility Planning
The study also contained recomillendatlolls for improverttents that
The Utilities I)epatytnent earsled
require stafT'review, These recantruendations will be carefully studied many awards and recognitions
by the Utilities' staff, public Utilities Board Arid City Cpumcil, and this year Including the "TPPA
Implemented If they provide Improved effectiveness, efiiciencies or Overall C;ommunicatltlns
customer service, The study results will also play a key role In shaping Award," the "Business of the
flture operations as these recommendations are Incorporated into the Year Award," and two "Recycling 9
s utility planning process, partnerships" awards.
8
f
L
UTILITY DIRECTOR R.E. NELSON RETIRES
i
i
V
"Through Bob
Nelson's leadership, the
Utilities Department
l , enjoys an excellent
reputation both locally
and nationally"
R,E, "Boh" Nelson bas lead the Bob Nelson, Denton's long-time Executive Director of Utilities, retired
Utllides Department for the last or% January 2, 1998. Mr, Nelson directed the City's Electric, Water,
twenty years, Wastewater, Solid Waste, pleet Service, and Storm Draluage operations
for twenty years,
Beginning with the first Texas Municipal Power pool meeting in 1974,
Mr. Nelson has been heavily Involved In the development of the
Utilities He has been a leader for the Utilltl" at a regional, state and
national level, serving as an ofllcer or member of the TMPA from {
1974-97, APPA from 1985 • 1993, TMUA from 1978 1979, TML
from 1985 - 1989, ERCOT front 19711 - 1998, NERC In 1986, and
TMPP from 1974. 1998, He was pre,iented with the Alex Radin
Distinguished Service Award from the APPA, winning top honors over
two thousand other nominees,
0 Highlights of Mr. Nelson's career Include the creation of the Upper
Trinity Regional Water District and making Lake May Roberts and its
parks and greenbelt a reality, Mr. Nelson was Instrumental In organiz-
ing a fiber optic communication network to link up all substations and
the City of Denton, He also contributed to the permitting process for t
Denton's landfill expansion with construction starting in January 1998,
r
Mr Nelson's focus on the development of sound long-term planning,
t, capital budgeting, and good analysis of capital and operatlonal invest-
tnents before implementation ensured Denton's utility future,
Everyone At the City appreciates Bob Nelson's past service and will
miss him,
8
,
i
r
t
I
THE ELECTRIC UTILITY
q
Tw'
I3lectrtc `Crew~Vtetnber in the 'nrti 'unity„
i 1 ,t q
1 41:'-: r
The Electric U itity
"Ehergizin
f tomorrow's
K commuhlty
todayf"
. t' CU tldu Ulall ~ r a" _ ,
Qp InspCCtl~11 of the ,+`.s
~ } unll','3' plicrator,
,
electric
F~ a empInyces take p
pilde in qualily
."chston)er,
R~ service,
y i
i ~
~aW + - - et FAQ
4 ,
E~
i
1
3
i
t
Retell Salos Close to 1998 levels
$ ? af'1 Retall sales to Denton customers totaled 902,177 MWH in 1997, 4.1Rb
"N~, f o►rn~tl Iegi4lVb below budget but close to 1996 sales of 906,099 MWF{ Residential
4 a0tlolt (tit plfQ{Ho customer sales of 312,522 MWH were essentially on target and only
Fr or uiatlsyrt 1,9% below 1996 sales of 313,604 MWH, Industrial sales were 61%
y°,q` otsaurr~d if! j;U1i7t~" below budget at 385,404 MWH, but were 2,9% above 1996 sales of
f"o' > 3740611 MWH, The lower than expected Industrial sales accounted j
for 70% of the total below budget energy sales performance.
Peak. nerg~ 1 HAiad Commercial sales were on budget at 171,345 MWH but 3.0% below
' 1996 sales, representing In part a migration of some customers to the ,
In .kegawatt±!
Industrial class, Government sales were below budget but represent #
i; plscal Xea ,
only 2,6% of customer sales. Some Government customers also moved
to the Industrial customer class In 1997. Despite lower than expected =
sales, a new record peak demand of 229 was recorded on July 29th,
cY
240
s
Off-System MWH Sales Contlnued to Decrease as
` projected
Off-system sales (resale) to the cities of Howie, Bridgeport and
- - Parmersvllle totaled 18,091 MW 14 In 1997 as compared to 34,321 r
/ MWH sold in 1996. However, sales to Brazos Electric Power '
2~Q Cooperative (BEPC), Garland and other electric Reliability Council of
Texas (ERCOT) members were 53,906 MWH In 1997, compared to
r 48,160 MMI in 1996, Total MWH sales were 70,880 in 1997 as
compared to 82,481 MWH in 1996,
- Rate Revenues 8010W Budget But Above 1998
/ Revenues
20b'
a Retail rate revenues totaled $61,091 million, 5,5% below budget but
i 1.8% above 1996 revenues of $60,015 million, Residential revenue
was on target at $24,567 million and 1,9% higher than 1996 revenues I fl.
of $24.107 million, Industrial rate revenues totaled $20,148 million, Q
8,9% below budget but still above the $19,821 million received in 1996
by 1.6%. The Implementation of it new university discount rate Is the
primary reason for the below budget Industrial rate revenue perfor•
180'' <<,ti '96,:i, mance, That reduced rate revenues by approximately $875,000,
'~lau .!95 6 Including a one time refund/credit of $565,000, This factor accounted
f;x} jj for half of the Industrial revenue shortfall,
A
L ' ! a I
~
a ,
0
0
) i
d
Small Commerclal revenues of $13,522 million were slightly below
budget and slightly above 1996 revenues of $13.2$0 million, Govern-
ment revenues were below budget and 1996 revenues, in line with
lower MWH sales, The remaining Lighting, htin Dusk to Dawn and u a
g g g A new PUC ruling..
Temporary Service revenues were 22016 above budget at $991,000, due mandatod open oooess
to much higher than expected Temporary Service revenues. Ofr- to all wholmsaleeleotrio
system (resale) revenues were $2,647 million compared to a budget of irnnsmisslon assets'
$2.757 million, 4,0% below projections.
New Wholesale Transmission Revenues Earned in
1997
A new source of unhudgeted revearcc (and cost) came on line In 1997.
Based on a Public Utilities Commission (PUC) ruling, all transmission
systems are now avallat•le to other udfitics oil a wholesale basis,.
Wholesale transmission revenues of $1,093 million were earned In
1997 compared to costs of $1.921 million,
Overall Revenues Close to Budget While Costs
Below Projectlons t
't'otal electric system revenue, which adds oirsysteut revenue, flew
wholesale transmission revenue, interest earnhtgs ($3,504 million), and
other non-operational lucome, was $76,169 million compared to a
budget of" $77,296 million, or within 1.50u of the budget, This
I t
compares very favorably to total 1996 revenues of $73,392 million, t.:<
'l'ocal expenditures reflected in file Comprehensive Annual Piuaucial
Report (CAPE), which includes depreciafion but excludes debt princi-
pal and fixed asset outlays, were $69,040 mullion in 1997 compared to
$66.950 million in 1996. Oil a cash basis, 1997 expenses of $70,7313 Anew transformer, added to Jim
million were $1,971 million or 2,6016 below budget and slightly higher Christal Substation, will help the
than 1996 expenses of $62024 million. Significant savings occurred in electric Utility better serve their
the maintenance and fixed asset expense areas, but were partially offset commercial customers by
by unbudgeted wholesale transmission costs,
~ doubling the substations
s Net Income of the CAPR basis was 7,129 million compared to 1996 capacity,
Income of $6,442 million, Cash net Income for 1997 totaled $5,431
million, 24,3% above 1996 cash net income of $4.369 million, and
significantly above 1997 protections,
9
'1 d f~.xth . ! r 17 f A G
'h...., ..~_.tr.L~ h.~.-r ms's/i~. I.1L. ~
Organization' Restructured to Become More
Efficient and to Prepare for Greater Competition
.R Several organization changes were instituted in 1997 that will r
strengthen the utility's ability to compete In the coming deregulated
market. One of the most significant changes was the formation of a
? separate Marketing furctlon that will allow the utility to focus greater
attention on key customers and develop strategies to maintain or i
increase market penetration for electric services, A now Communica-
dons group was formed and other communication functions were
realigned under a new giber/CIS division, The Dispatch function was
also absorbed by the, Substations division,
Electric Distribution crew splices Major Improvements Made WEthin $yetem
cable for a fiber optic network
which will link all substations and The capacity of the Jim. Christal Substation was upgraded to
the City of Denton accommodate growth In system demand. The $200,000 cost to
accomplish the upgrade was substantially below budget, A major new
fiber optics communication project was completed In cooperation with
the Denton Independent School District (DISD), All schools within
DISD are now linked together using modern fiber optics communica-
tions equipment,
Legislative Action on Deregulation Delayed but
Industry Continues to Move Toward a Competitive
Market
The Issue of deregulation and stranded Investment continues to receive
attention at the state level but no resolution has been reached, This
® remains a major Issue for both Denton and the TMPA system, and Is
"The Utility completed an important factor that will determine Denton's ability to compete in
a maJOr neW the future marketplace. Denton has retained legal assistance to
communications project represent the Electric Utility in the state legislative process,
In a cooperative effort
with DI9D,'
e ~ p r
t
10
k ,
A=Z ~4~1 ft'
I
ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT
REVENUES EXPENSES
Residential $ 26,224,408 Personal Services $ 6,199,718
Industrial /Commerclal 34,080,780 Malnil8vppIMist 4,723,099
Government 1,894,004 Purchased Power 39,808,644
CBP1R080181Miso 4,173,603 Fixed Assets 3,008,648
Interest /Transfer ,,087A72 Debt Service I Other 7,920,323
Other 998,166 Administrative Cost 4,140,627 t
Total = 70,24-3 Total 84,80869~
REVENUES EXPENSES
Cute, Derlmai
Int&e N! 1'M1 NeINpnUal AJm Coil ; Somm
rransryr x4s 61s 8Y, s
6Y. Aa,nlf5uDD7 r
t>e✓w 5arcOr M•f0 ~ 1
Omer 10'fi
C9D/Rosa 'a0 11'5 EE€ €
~{lit
Mac j 4jIt
GX ppit iE~,f
I.
l,neeAgelf
n9YBIryT9~l 55, i
`yV,~ fMesU'd4 - P n61
Co++~'e~oal 67r,
66k
Total Rovenuea & Cash Expenaos Rate Revenuo by Customer Class
1074 30
_ 6z , 15
196E 6177 10
e7 99
4995 t 6493 ly
- SGT 7 S
768
1993 ~ Gt 95
S5 00 mm 6600 7000 199t 1970 1qm 1994 1093
M11110119 111
rtE:penses {]nevanuef ■Ra6denIla 10 CWM014,41 111111 NO t0bl 110ov e1nment tSLyntS ,
..ww
Average Billed Rovenuo I KWH Annual Glgawatt Hour Sales
4$0
1997 ee9 Oro
ID36 ee3 3M
1s 309 111111
Ig9s eel J~
d 900 n
1 ~ V
1974 a to I60 m
5 1993 e49 60
1.00 100 300 400 600 060 iW $00 0 1997 1996 1995 1991 - 1993
Cants I KWH
■ResMenual tlCwtunercial 111neu{Inal r6ev6mMen! plghta
li
.1tt fit f~d~r eif 1 ~ i ~ 'l ~ Y
r~..
b
ELECTRIC STATISTICS I
I
Manhours Worked tlrosa Revenue Pof Monhour
1997 91.996 19)7 2M
1o96 506.726 IV's ?M
I6?5 `2M.w 1995 N
0011 Im I82 1991 41>
490J 205.1 7 1991 212
200.000 Mow
Manhoure no, 000 250.009 205 210 21S ?70 (S) 22S 270 M 210
I
~
Oobt Coverage Ra116 Bonds Payable
1997 81 1997 16 17
1096 ~ NO 1?]6 ISM
1995 3 40 1995 M 16
1211 7)] 1491 211!
, 4J3 199 1441 24 21
n. ~7[BlI
1 00 )DO 106 600 Soo 6 00 10 11 11 16 11 70 22 14 26
Bond Covenants 1,26 MIIII0n6(3)
Fixed Assot Addlltone Bond Addltlona
io, r 6ooe.611 12f 7 o u
14)6 2166.250 1916 0 S
1995 2061 !A5 1995 17
1991 001
V4~i1 290) 521
19J7 2.16165 4491 91
1.000604 200000o )000000 1,000.000 00 02 04 of 08 10
111 MIII10n6 (S)
d
Net Asset Value Installed Bleotrlo Llnes
1497 44 0 ~y91 111
VD16 AY4 26
1415 6171071 1491 110
{ 7S J9 79 61 41 4S 42 105 115 IN HS IL' 40
Millions (S) Mllu of Una
12
' Ty y rl
I rtAilpl ;A Z
i ,
j r
f,
THE WATER UTILITY
Water E'' ploy' ee~ Sha'rtii KnowledquVith Class
~w . yr,
i v
,r~
,p I
F
t
ThdVater Utility
"00ality water,
abundant sources
& excellence in
servicel ;
' Water & W tstc
fi water employees ttt.NJON.
® celcbtatc Dritlkitly,
Water Week at
City Cnnncil.
i
Parliele temoyal
& mnxfluizatinn +ka
of chollicals 9
prnmoles Plant ' •1i~,`~,
low,
s;~ez. OplLuizntion: ,r+
E
xhi'~b
....wY.:3LYrw4r✓}.lu~.....r.«.~.~rrr+rr+- - ua._. I ~ E "4t1~
to
Water Sales Affected by Above Average Rainfall
*,/I it,; Retail and wholesale water sales for 1997 totaled 4.610 billion gallons,
a+bt { !3~,' 3,0% below projections and 3,9% below 1996 volumes of 4,797 billion
4 i;lOrt~M~g1i~~~ gallons, In general, sales were impacted by temperature and rainfall
" The Diatrl
Plan will Iwff~b variations during the year, Residential volumes of 1,605 billion gallons
blue prlr~l }pr,, yt" were 046 below budget and 12,1% below 1996 volumes, Commerclal
capital Itt~pf4~~q sales came in at 2,140 billion gallons, 41% below budget and 4,0%
pro~eottr below 1996 sales of 2,230 billion gallons,
Wholesale sales to Upper Trinity Regional Water District (UTRWD)
f. were 732,9 million gallons, 6,840 above budget However, this was due
Rainfall "Inl 1naehe1" 13y to new sales of raw water that began In July, 1997 (223,8 million
Fiscal '(''"ear gallons), which accounted for 30,5% of total annual sales UTRWD
yr,
completed construction of its new water treatment plant in the
summer of 1997, several months earlier than expected, The sale of
60 only 509,1 million gallons of treated water to UTRWD (25,8% below
budget) reflected UTRWD's switch from treated to raw water use,
Government sales were 10,140 below budget but account for less than
3% of total volume sales,
Average dally volumes for retail customers were 10,623 million gallons
per day (MOD). When wholesale volumes are added, average daily
requirements were 12,631 MGD, 3,9% below 1996 dally requirements
40 }1. of 13.14 MGD. The 1997 peak demand of 24,76 MOD occurred on
July 28th, 1.05 MOD below the historical peak demand of 25,81 MOD
fY.
set in 1996, When wholesale demand of 3,00 MGD Is removed, the
i } Denton retail peak demand was 21,76 MOD, 4.4% below the 1996
g retail peak demand of 22,75 MGD,
e / ~4 Rate Revenues Lower Than expected but Total
Revenues Exceeded Budget Projection
20
r t i
Iyt Rate revenues closely followed the below budget volume sales, Total
rate revenues of $14,498 million were 3,346 below budget and 6,7%
i3 below 1996 revenues of $15,533 million, Residential revenues were
only ,7% below budget at $6,305 million, but 8,6% below 1996 rev.
4?
+ t enues. Commercial revenues of $7,011 million were 3.940 below
budget and 4,2% below 1996 revenues, Wholesale revenues from
0 ±j UTRWD were sigol8cantly affected by the transition to raw water sales,
R as revenues of $749,201 were 16,090 below budget Government
'93 '94' 45 '96 99
customer revenues of $432,828 were 6340 below budget,
14
0
G
i
Total operating and nonoperating revenue totaled $16,024 million,
2.6% above budget but 4.4% below 1996 revenues of $16,762 million,
interest earnings of $1.195 million were significantly above budget and
more than offset lower than expected rate revenues.
Cost Savings Significantly Enhanced Not Income I
Total CAFR costs were recorded at $11,816 million, significantly below "lower than budgeted
both the budget and 1996 CAPR expenses of $13,992 million, Savings costs contributed
occurred In several areas. Over half of the savings occurred in the to positive not
income,
maintenance area when the $550,000 tank painting project was
deferred. Cash expenses of $13591 million were 16,8% below budget
and slightly above 1996 expenses of $13,210 million,
The slightly above budget revenues and lower than expected costs
combined to provide a CApR net Intone of $4,208 million compared
to $2,770 million in 1996. Cash net Income of $2,433 million signifi•
candy exceeded the budget Incame of $1,087 million, but was 31,590
below the $3552 million net income recorded In 1996,
Cross Connection/9ackflow Testing Requirements ;
Improve Water Safety
ti
The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) has s
established requirements to prevent contamination front a possible
cross connection or backfow entering the water supply. The Utility °
must test all bmAllow prevention assemblies upon installation by •
1 certified testers and annually test assemblies in high hazard
installations,
14 _
r
The Staff has prepared and the City Council adopted a cross
connection ordinance that requires the Installation and Inspection of
appropriate control devices and sets up a certification and testing
program that supplements existing plumbing permit requirements, Water Meter Shop employees
The Utility will also track high hazard locations, such as hospitals,
~ received Tokay software training p •
laboratories, car washing facilitles, etc., and notify property owners of
the need for annual testing and filing of testing documentation with for the prevention of backfow
AF' the ('fly, and cross connections,
~
_if5
E
New Water Distribution Master Plan Adopted
F ~
A new comprehensive plan for the development of the water
distribution system through the year 2020 has been adopted by the
Utility, 1( will provide the basis for capitol Improvement planning.
The plan identifies several new capital requirements, Including water
transmission lines, storage tanks, elevated storage tanks and pump
stations, The Plan Identified a critical need for new elevated storage in
the middle and upper plane areas,
,t
A
Construction Began on Sanger Pipeline
The project to construct a water transmission line between Denton and
Sanger moved from the engineering to the construction phase in 1997,
The Water plant obtained new Denton and UTRWD entered into a contract to jointly develop and
equipment to monitor the clarity operate a transmission line that will serve areas north of Denton. The
of the water leaving the treatment g218 million pipeline runs from Loop 288 North along 1.35 to Sanger,
plant, This process helps them and will be used Initially to provide treated water to the City of Sanger, l'
to continue providing the high. f
quality water citizens enjoy In This additional transmission line capacity will support Denton's eco•
Denton.. nomlc development goals for the area along the 1,35 corridor, north of '
the City, There has been a significant increase In commercial activity
lit this area in recent years.
In addition, Denton has oversized the line from 12" to 16" from Loop
288 to Mllam Road. Completion Is scheduled for April 1998, and
Denton's share of the total contract costs is approximately $IA
million, The water will be sold to UTRWD for resale to Sanger
"The Sanger pipeline will through a wholesale contract,
® provide Increased water This essentially ends the Interim sale of treated water to UTRWD,
tranemiselon capacity to Denton's only wholesale treated water sales will be to UTRW`S for
support future resale to Sanger, development In north All previous wholesale water customers have
Denton" transferred to UTAWI) for water service during the past few years,
Denton expects to sell raw water to UTRWD under a separate whole-
4) sale raw water contract for the next several years,
18
r tF
"OL
1
ca
l
1
I
i
I
1
WATER DEPARTMENT
i ~
j
REVENUES EXPENSES
Cottlmerclaf 7,080,499 1Stipp IMlso 1,798,602
Residential $ $,377,219 [AdmlnlsRsFvo nalServices $ 2,111,799
Oovornmanl 448,663 ased Power 670,289
Wholossle 793,636 Assoia 11360,839
InlerpstlTrana!er 1,194,80? ervICOIother
Other 128,766 Cost 6,784,783
Total 2 674 y1004'19
6 !
{
REVENUES
EXPENSES
Nuvor C", Nrknei
hemrer , I% Ad," CON ,--SeMae
7% - ae 4
/00%
IA%
% 16%
\ Ma~llau9Pl
r Mk
Nfwlole•1 13%
5% PmWIe4
PMU
:Ilfl~
OOVemmeM ~ IEI IEf I
SYI li + ~f NWAiW,
1
Cwnmerasi 1{ 0%
44% oe53se oo 1
oo,v
u%
TOlal RuVCnuea S 09sn Expanses 4ROovearsl stomerClus
_
to, r---•••-~ teo7 e
1935 2
_ 1105 9
1993 _f
Ta r
V-y1991 _ 14 It 199] IS Av 1
sco 9P: ~ 110 1300 1500 1100 1900
tltl uvonuds Une3Wem mmolelme rAotner
Water • Avotage Revenue Annual (191101111 Coneumed
110 F
1999 J 20 CO
995 S m 1994 J!s S~_, woe toe o S° 100 161 200 150 300 S
AG 400 VA 1995 1991 1497
Carmere+9!in9vemmenl mmoMlsle lJoth r
17
1 ~ , r S
1
t~
c:
I
WATER STATISTICS
Manhours Worked Grose Revenue Per Monlleur
lot 11 ,111 -1901 IM
x
Ip•A 176.1 6 Ig91 ❑3
1095 Uf,474 1096 1 1
.1991 190,451 1991 101 r
lmf II, 013 1,43
I SP
110.000 170,000. 110.070 140,000 M 70 170 110 710 t
Manhows lil
r
Real Coverage Rotlo Bonds Payable
Im/ 16 1907 441 ,
1990 179 1006 491
1975 101 1995 14.00 F
904 1' 1091 194
1997 703 Im3 1 dd 7~
OM 100 1 50 7 07 766 3 co 3 77 00 10 N 30 40 60
Bond Oouenlnl • US MIIIlon9111 1
Flxed Asset Addlllone Bond Additlono
1991 350 111 1997 097
1916 I, 061 94 1906 100
1695 UN.156 1997 040
104 1.001019 1976 000
lm! 1711176 1097 1,1
3!4,057 Ow Ow 1350,ow 1150,000 01. 66 09 1.0 17
lil Mullom lit
b ,
Net Asset Volue Installed Water Lines
1007 9101 Im) 1 9
IYB 97.71 1096 X31
w 1095 9130 104 311
® Iml b6 d6 1944 301 ~ S
t.. ~ 1071 63 Of Imf
J lA.M .6000 7000 6000 31W 10000 11000 710 760 900 300 $10 310 390 140 760
Mllllonl (ill) Will of Line
1A
cr
l
THE WASTEWATER UTILITY
Tree Farm at the Wastewater Treatment Plant
i
i
I ~
s. ~
The Wastewater Utility
"Committed to the
stewardship of
clean water
for the futurel"
Wastewaiar crews ~
_ vacuuor manholes tttatet► ~ ~ '
as parr of their -
Preveralve
Main- Program,
Rxperirnent.9 are j
imdetway with
Vermf or worm
cumiiost{ng, I
19
1 .y
t•7
i
I
j
1
Treatment Volumes Higher Than Expected, While
Billed Volumes Below Projections
"Above &ern$e Billed volumes for 1997 totaled 2,883 billion gallons, 12,9% below
rainfall Increased hudg tt and 7,0% below 1996 billed volumes of 3,101 billion gallons,
treatrmOntvolurflee ` Residential billed volumes of 93 t.4 million gallons were 19,2Wo below ¢
but lowered billed
volumes and projections and 11.0% below 1996 volumes, Residential volumes
revenues;' continued to be affected by the revision in methodology for calculating
residential wastewater winter averages, Commercial billed volumes
were only 3,5% below projections at 1,537 billion gallons, essentially
equal to 1996 billed volumes,
Effluent Volume In
Billions Of Gi11ons,3
Fiscal 'Year y Sales of effluent to the Spencer Power Plant were nearly 50% below
budget, but effluent sales are diMrult to predict as power plant
requirements depend on several variables, The Residential and
Effluent cusinmers accounted for 88% of the below budget billed
5 volume recorded In 1997, While government customer volumes were
also below budget, wholesale volumes w,ributed to Corinth and
UTRWD (Argyle) were nearly 11% abcw, , b,.dget,
/ The Wastewater Treatment Plant discharged 4.705 billion gallons in
4 1997, 16.4% above projections and 24,6% above 1996 volumes of 3,777
~ +,y 1s billion gallons. Tltls is attributable to a greater amount of rainfall it,
' I' 19971 and storm water accounts for a significant percentage of the
total volume treated, The 1997 peak wastewater flow of 32.86 MGn
occurred on February 136, and this peak exceeded the 1996 peak flow
of 17,94 MGD by over 8390
' i Net Income Positive Despite Lower Billed Volumes
2 and Revenues
'
Rate revenues tracked lower billed volumes and were recorded at
$9,607 million, 6,7% below budget but only 2,0% below 1996 revenues
Ir of $9,804 million, Residential customer revenue, now based on a flat
rate over a 12 month period, was $3,495 million, 8,7% below budget
O 1 but only 2,2% below 1996 revenues of $3,575 million, Commercial
revenue of $5,353 million was 3,2% below budget and essentially equal h Q
t to 1996 revenues o($5,370 million,
Erb
Government and Industrial (effluent) revenues were below budget,
0
'94 '95 Industrial revenue accounted for 279b of the total below budget rate
20
r*r+ ~ fr o~.+rAp431'~t v,,;(~ ° ~ _i i r2, I
i ~ ,~,l~'" r.:•,' rid. „t~yy~.
0
revenue performance. Wholesale revenues were 10.5% above budget,
In line with higher than expected billed volumes. t
Total revenues were recorded at $10,504 million, 4.8% below budget
and slightly above 1996 revenues of $10.439 million, Expenses,
however, were lower than projected, with CAR expenses recorded at "The biosollds
$8.157 million, This provided on-target CAM net income of $2,347 oomposting operation
million, which was only slightly below 1996 Income of $2,465 million. will pay big divldende,"
Cash expenses of $9.681 million were 6.4% below budget, due
primarily to salary savings, the lack of development plan line projects
and the deferral of some capital projects. The combined revenues and
expenses provided cash net Income of $,823 million, 6,60/o above
budget, but significantly below 1996 net Income of $1,702 million
Compost Operations Increased Significantly "Cost savings offset
revenue shortfalls and
The production of compost material rose by 26% in 1997, reaching allowed the Wastewater
8,155 cubic yards as compared to 6,470 cubic yards in 1996, This also Utility toaohieve Its
represents a 444% Increase above the 1,500 cubic yards produced In Ilnanolal
goals for the year,"
1995, The Wastewater Utility began compost marketing activities in
1997. Compost was sold as elther wood mulch or finished compost in
volntutcs of one-half or one cubic yard, A total of 391 cubic yards of
f TM
wood mulch and 938 cubic yards or compost were sold to Individual
cltstonters, which provided revenues of $22,686 to offset the cost of ,
operation Approximately 3,500 citbic yards of compost was used for f`
City parks landscaping and for landfill cover application, This program
also provides an operational and cost benefli by saving Inridflll space,
Cnstoutcrs currently pick tip the compost material In an unpackaged
form at the compost site, but plans are underway to Improve the
Process, Compost material will be bagged In smaller volumes, which
will improve handling and make the compost available to a greater
number of customers. This action will also provide new sales of
compost material to commercial firms, increasing revenues to levels
that more fully recover costs.
A utility customer picks up a
truck load of the Wastewater S ftT
t Inflow/inflltratlon Correotlin Projects Initiated Plant's "Dyno Dirt" compost I
Following Smoke Testing Efforts
The results of the smoke testing progrant began to pay dividends in
1997 as specific repair projects were began to correct
21
=Nomad
66 1
~V
V
I
I
inflow/infiltration problems in the wastewater collection system,
Approximately 5150,000 was dedicated to correction projects within ~
the three regions of the City that were smoke tested, and several more
projects are planned for completion during the next few years, Two ^
more regions need to be smoke tested to complete the city-wide testing
program to identify specific areas that need priority attention for j
correction efforts)
I
I
i
Water Declamation Plant Received State Award for i
t, Support of Tree Planting Project
The Texas Forest Service and Texas Urban Forestry Council awarded
the 1997 Community Award to the Denton treatment plant,, The
plant, along with Keep Denton Beautiful and the Denton County
Drainage crews install warning Master Gardeners, collaborated on a "tree farm" program that
signs and road blocks to help provides trees for numerous civic tree planting projects, beautification
citizens steer clear of high water, projects and the Ray Roberts Greenbelt project, The Water Reclama•
tion Plant contributes to the program by providing compost used when
planting new trees and other landscape materials,
Drainage Maintenance Capabilities Significantly
Strengthened
'rhe ability of the Department to satisfy growing drainage maintenance
requirements was greatly enhanced through the addition of new posi-
tions and programs through the budget process, The addition of Ave
new positions beginning in Plscal Year 1998 enabled the department to
establish separate O&M, Channel Rehabilitation and Special Projects
crews while maintaining street sweeping activities,
A "Drainage Department
employees have New or enhanced programs include a channel recovery project,
completed extensive Increased maintenance activities as outlined In the Dralnage O&M
training on flood plan, a safety program, overtime funding for Improved high water
conditions and high water response, and new dumpster service for street sweeping operations, A
rescue." major new automated flood warning system Is also planned for 1998
that will Improve the Department's response to flood conditions In Q
a critical areas of the City,
22
m
c~
i
i I
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
# a
REVENUES EXPENSES
Residential E 3,500,984 Personal Servfcos S 2,429,063 I
Commet0€al 6384,162 MAinlISuppIMiac 1,280,995 t
Government 379,677 Purchased Power 434,320 i}
Wholesale 369,377 Pixed Ass els 1,096,239
Interest I Transfer 86000 Debt Sorvlce/Other 3,208,881
Other 180,874 AdminlstradvaCost 1,261,856
Total 1 1Q604r394 ToUl 9,66 ,364 i
iI
REVENUES EXPENSES
INVOW oftf Ra3dMaai Admn COST
iran4br $5~ 33% 10% Pon"
75K
w1WIb'e i
4k~I II!I i
II 'lh!111 AEI I Man11 SVPPI
! jE jlk,lit iII~IU~IEI ~ 7%
~'111 IIjffl k~ EIIjI''l~Elillgl[II~lf]I~I
9I j lilllllll l(l dlEl PurNal fd
Gorercm4r.1 nett Sercd! !~3EEi !I IlI;IEII Por&
sx Owe l;;f!i11E1 ak
Sax `IIII!il
Canrcera al
51k h,edAOW
A1
Total Revenues & Cash Expenses Rate Revenue by Customer Class
B
1592 ~ 9 Io A
~.50
-.v.._...Y~
19'A G d
10 46
t935 ~ 3
A e9
19Ird 7
A 91 1
1093 1.71 . - i - il AIL
76r
7 d dom A00 e 0 Id co 1200 y9/ 4A 1935 1934 1093
MINUS It
■E:eMn4es Ottevenuer Ilnosdonne! tlCornmerdel ■NMO!a59re ■aovemmem pr3u!er
Wastewater • Average Revenue Annual Gallons Hllldd
s7r -339
, (A
1316 yr 170
I, t9)S 31r 0Be
ass nso
QY 1le
1313 tae moo
dSO 100 150 200 150. 000 143 406 1992 193A 1415 1994 1933
(SI1 4000 Gallons ■RewonGe1 Oconwor"I Sw510!eurs woovernmenl toome+
23
a`+'vw x yXI i
%
1% 1) jelik
1
e
WASTEWATER STATISTICS
Manhours Worked Oross Revenue Per Manhour ,
1991 131,11 1191 70
f9k 115.551 1996 U
Y»5 111 l7J 1996 60
i
1996 11?657 1994 72
57
199) 1 ,911 100
M
125,C/A 110,000 115,0% 140,M4 115,000 t6 26 36 M 50 so r0 0
Manhours RI
Debt Coverage Ratlo Bonds Payable
1597 1933 16 rl
r
1946 1916 It
lViS 0! 1075 I/ 3
V»I 3 1071 I6 N
t
V») 03 1997 1166
Ilk00"
150 600 10 1 1 1/ 16 16 20 6 20 21 21
Band Covenant • 1.26 Millions ISI
Fixed Asset Additions Bond Addi lone
»i 1m6s7 1»r 120
1916 )66l E9/ Iy56 100
1935 I,J19,IM 1935 090
1991 1.007 019 1»I 060
1977 r1 V6 1093 1,1
150000 650.000 1,1!0.000 IAw 000 04 06 06 10 17
s (S) Millions (S)
Net Asset Value Installed Wastewater Lines
. 1 id I»7 120
I
f9?6 1670 1936 Jib
!935 )7 1 1977 1H
1994 151 1991 101
I. 991 7161 4971 6
V000 2000 1000 1000 mm 170 760 790 300 310 310.
Million 1(S) MIlas of Line
24
. ...~~,$p.,I,y^~ ~9fi ,'k:'~pa n~Ft• ey ` } r5
77 FF77~r`` 3
I
l
T14E SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT
TNRCC Granted Denton 'a' Landfill Pertnit
CITY OF DENTON
ca~rrat.
~Me~rs otwA,co tC
PRAM
DENTON LANDFLL EXPANSION r
My CW oQ-00N CI iRIbT01h ' '
At Xa* on a %Om vn. caanuctar ;
• 1WSRNwittn V"do q t wit Loo~r
1 ..'.nr~rm~ae crrnvgNS mi- wog
r:
Solld'Wa'st4 bspcj'rtme # 1
r
sdrvice'.
cost,i'ompotltive, J& ~y
a
r 4
JV
e,o j~0hm al
r F ~ , i J 1 3 S 1 ,i ~4
i
1
ecgClitig Cacilit~ w!rli~ `
llltvct~ b~N~lbN
thc1l~lnri'dfillaE•' MM~a1rr.NueiMlinu~ibr 'r '
t
i_~u 1161r n c t l o 11
d o i the lan'dflll @
t, 4xdnnsi'on
project, has ' l
f begun, l
25 I
....L.wJSi. J ..u.•....~...~~~.........,Irr, -::ofLAWMWk1
1
1
r
I
Landfill Tonnage Significantly Above Projections
r Solid Waste landfill tonnage totaled 103,062 tons of solid waste
"The residential waste disposed of in 1997, 10% above the 86,955 tons landfiiled in 1996,
stream decreased for the{:
seventh straight year's Residential volumes totaled 57,365 cubic yards in 1997, 5,5% below
budget and even with 1996 volumes of $7,355 cubic yards. Commer-
cial landfill volumes of 353,162 cubic yards exceeded, projections by
t~ 101% and exceeded 1996 volumes of 311,799 cubic yards by 13,30Po,
r Other solid waste volumes received at the landfill from municipal,
contract and cash customers totaled 41,972 cubic yards, only 13%
Solid WdsW, 'omhe,"cia[ below target but 111% below 1996 volumes of 47,728 Cubic yards.
X0.luutes ln,:ionOx 1000);1
By Piscal . ear ' I ; Residential disposed of 18,880 tons in 1997, 11,4% above the 16,944
tons recorded in 1996, Commercial recorded a very significant
increase of 27,24'0, front 55,413 to 70,485 tons, while tonnage from the
other municipal, cash, and contract landfill customers decreased from
80 j 15,186 to 13,697 tons, or 9,84'0.
I
Recycling tonnage increased by 7.6%, from 9,706 tons In 1996 to ~
10,444 tons in 1997, and was significantly above the 1,618 tons
recycled in 1993. The overall recycling rare Increased by 1001o from
1996 to 1997, from a total of 9,9% to 11,04'0 by weight, nearly six times
60 the 1993 recycling rate. Residential recycling rates increased by 4.5o/0
from 1996 to 1997, and currently represents 34,940 of the iota[
residential waste stream when yardwaste is included, It is estimated
that over 54,000 cubic yards of landfill space was saved In 1997
tz ! through recycling, representing an avoided landfill cost of $191,000,
~ i i4o
) r
Residential and Commercial Rate Revenues Higher
e, Than Expected
2.' Residential revenues of $2,630 million were 6,Po above budget and
' 2,441 above 1996 revenues of $2,568 million, Commercial revenues
were 8,8% above projections at $3,781 million and 15.7% above 1996
revenues of $3269 ntillion This performance was primarily due to
very high demand for open top and special pickup service; Dumpster A
and compactor revenues were very close to budget. Recycling revenues
40
or $60,973 exceeded 1996 revenues, but were substantially below the
r $111,675 budget and reflected the continuing weak recycling product
market. 5 4{6 if ,97,
0!
0
Landfill revenues from cash, contract and other customers were 3.5%
below projections at $395,269, but 7,1% above 1996 revenues of
$369,175 million, These revenues continued to decline In line with
lower volumes of material brought directly to the landfill,
The total combined rate revenues from Residential, Commercial and "The award of the
Landfill customers were 7.1% above budget at $6,806 million and 9,7% landfill oo118t ma
permit was a majon
or
above total 1996 rate revenues of $6,206 million. Total revenues from milestone In the
all sources totaled $7,581 million, 6,7% above budget and 13,0% above landfill expansion
1996 revenues of $6,709 million, projeot I
t
Greater Than Expected Revenues and Lower Than
Budgeted Expenses Enhanced Net Income
Net income on the CAM basis was $1,846 million, substantially above
budget And nearly double 1996 net income of $957,600. Also, a major
adjusinient that decreased landfill closure costs by $1.476 million was
reflected in the income statement as extraordinary Income, bringing
total CANR net income to $3.323 million. On the cash basis, expenses
totaled $6.479 million, 8.8% below budget but 7.4% above the 1996
total expense of$6,035 sttillion. Cash net income was $1,102 million,
significantly above budget as well as 1996 cash net Income of $674,264,
Public•Prlvate Partnerships Formed to Enhance
Recycling Programs
Denton welcomed several new private enterprise partners to help
expand various recycling programs. A private paper recycling firm
added the capability to recycle many other types of paper in addition
to newspaper. Another partnership with a textile company resulted in
Denton becoming the only metroplex city with a used clothing
recycling program. Other potential partnerships are being pursued to
recycle construction And demolition debris, furniture and mattresses.
Customer service to Solid Waste's
Recycling Programs Recognized With Awards commercial customers has been •
enhanced to promote a positive
J. . business
Solid Waste's continuing efforts to improve its recycling program rapport with Denton's community,
earned the Department two signiAcant awards in 1997, The Denton
County Corporate Recycling Council (DCCRC) presented the City
with the Environmental Vision Award for Recycling er Waste
27
Q
0
{
Minimization, Shortly afterwards, Denton received the Texas Recycling
Coalition's (TRC) Best Recycling Partnership in Texas award, These i
r.. v
awards attest to Denton's strong commitment to community-wide
r recycling programs.
ti
Landfill Expansion Permit Received Without Need
3,,1 for Final Public Hearing
3
In October 1997, TNRCC awarded a permit to the City of Denton to
proceed with construction of the expanded landfill When completed,
a total of 155 acres of landfill space will be available to provide three
decades of secure disposal space for the City, Construction will begin
early 1998, with completion scheduled for the following October.
Solid Waste employee, Mike
Fogel, teaches our TNRCC This event culminated several years of effort to secure a final state
certified I laxardous Waste permit in time to provide new landfill space before the existing site was
Inspection Class to Denton's full, Hard work on the part of the Staff and the City's engineering
landfill employees. consulting firm resulted in the award of the permit without the need
for the final public hearing, This accomplishment allowed the Depart- ~
merit to avoid large legal fees as well as schedule delays that might have
resulted In other slgniAcant costs,
i
1
Landfill Training Programs Recognized at State and
National Level
i
The Solid Waste Landfill staffmade a presentation on its landfIll
training program to the 351h Annual International Solld Waste
Association of North America (SWANA) Conference In St, Louis, The
presentation focused on the significant benefits of the training pro-
grain, including a reduction In the accident rate, a reduction his the
workers compensation rate, and higher employee retention.
Denton Is currently the
only city in Texas that Is
eertifledtotraln landfill The`Staffalso discussed the TNRCC accreditation for continuing
operators In waste education credits given when teaching the Waste Inspection Program
Inspection,' developed at the Denton landfill, Denton Is currently the only city in
Texas that is certlfied to train landfill operators in waste Inspection, O
t" Another highlight was Dentort's participation in the Texas SWANA
Statewide Safety Committee in 1997• The state group was formed to
provide a resource network for members concerning safety issues and
training programs,
28
~i
c~
1
Y
SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT
REVENUES EXPENSES
Reeldentlal $ 2,629,803 Personal Services E 2,167,49900
Commercial 3,781,017 Mainl I Supp 1 Mc 1,933,086
Landfill 395,268 Closure IPostclosure 217,070
Hoeycling 60,973 Fixed Assets 188,081
Inleresl7Transfer 437,762 Debt Sorvice70thaf 1,191,880
Other 276,683 Administrative Cast 781,696
Total 7,681.396 1 Total ,479,121 1
1
REVENUES EXPENSES {
44A Re3idenUel pww*I
}5% Adorn C9fl Se*e
Trerafei-~
e% ,Ik=i
Recytlng Debi Serval IIP€ Iiii:! I,
ovw
.EI €Glill~€
SA
(9muU Al3vJleaypl
_ CO~M1'nlIU11 p6" we
- ~ yd
49% 3% 30%
Total Revenue & Cash Expenses Rate Revenue by Customer Close
400
a9r -lss 360
_ g43 G
1978 --loll all 300
964
1995 $21 a00
s~ 1.50
1991 4 8756a 100
1973 4 88 050
200 300 440 500 goo 700 800 900 1991 1098 1998 IVA Ml
Mllllonsl3l rnesdenUel gcommeaal roi3p4ul
rE,peme9 IlRevenuee
Solid Waste • Average Revenue Annual CuW blo Yard Landlilled
400
1991 1504 360 . . -
19% ie97 ~ MID _
~y8 J60
19gs g7V 240
He
50 ID ~
800 700 9.07 1100 1300 1500 17 oa 1002 1998 IOOS low 1093
rnnaenlul bCamxrwi raepo3r
4 r;` {4)! Cuble Yard
20
SOLID WASTE STATISTICS
I
Manhours Worked Gross Revenue Per Monhour
1927 111,665 1997 63
h
$06 ,40.2 t690 w 5
1995 1'!,520 1 W5 43
199d 116.9.4 I991 <0
463! 179.5651 1993
IISMO 125000 1$s 600 545.000. 155000 ,060 2000 3000 4000 5009 6000 1000 6000
Manhours Ifl
Debt Coverage Ratlo Bonds Payable
1991 ~3 91 f i
1997 761
19.9 1385 I 19li fide
105 14 89 1995 4 67 II
104 77 1991 11F
199) 31 1991 C>2
106 260 300 400 $0 60 700 200 600 60 60 1600
Bond covenant y 1,26 Millions If}
i
Flxed Asset Addltions Bond Additions
1997 I 031 1997 0 20 1
1936 254,462 1996 309
1695 361,762 1995 033
1996 760, 715 ID34 1,45
1993 113. bt !993
100.00 150,00'1 20060 Ma 0) mo wo mow
I 2 1 i
If1 Mllhons (f)
iA
.j L
Not Asset Value
1997 fit 6.19
loge I~s91f, ~ 1995 76 ~ ~ r
` 19vd 19
VI .4`,~ 1693 BI
100 200 30 4M 500 600 7.0
Mllllons (f}
30
tr~rY1AM4 ne - i1 1 ;j r F
k iWrri `n ^ ~~r.eii
~ r
U
11
I
i
(j
01 1,
Y E, lY XI
JS a4a~, ~~)[jS' >
}9 i ~~§,P rr~~ rl '
t
! ' EI s ' J~4. I {,i r, '6 R Ir
t? t 4,+tGt? "P +t "JJ ~ YI I!
GYM ! 1 f~t' ' I tl
I J }1
st .:S ~s i. J r f r it II 'f ! --i~ <
f~ Ll { St - a ~
' 1 r
i k5!~ J J~ S~ ,h ~ I 1
12
so$i t;+ :yy i+ f• • I
zr; f OPERATING
I ~ +w k; i~✓++~+i++l'J+S(~ `J(+, vtJ I r
1 itF r STATISTICS
A 1 + 1. YS T~
'i f ~ r ,'~i J, fI ~ ! 11✓t~t 1 ~~t ~{9$•~~i~r• iX
1 t I~ ! 1 oy ! - al ' 111 , rA. vrr o $
! `S ~},1 yf r y, I' 1 111 9~ o /R cSY
.I
j 1a ~ I ' • , S p04 > ~ n`~'i y t ~ i~Y , itt R~2
~ 1 1 i ~ ' I / 1 ~ _ H1+1111 {:yy.{J\ Yln y r{Y,
I I f ' 1 ' I d < 4fs4 . 0001`\ 0 OI~i > \
~ ~ r I + .r. !C'cl' y 11 ~ ♦11~
1 1 +I ~ ~ (1 1 { i .y~y,<i>i~ y 1✓a ~t i Y' e (i~'
rl LJ I~ytas wmo ~ j ' if b
ia~ •~k i,, Y cJ{Jr v~}
T 1f 1 ~v vI. t i.. u ~3~.w4
J. ~ (~F Ya'6 e~ O✓0~ \ '~:2, 3S,,ry' .~.::t .;o^:
r t Y\i 1/x'11 i~ < C"\ ,`:%~:1\N
r rw
rt { [ 1 ._i f 1 ?DI~I/y.,+E~ly({\ `'w S,\,\Sn N,\\~ y
I , f ` J~ 1 '{'111(4 SQL `~Y\ \ 21S t ~Khy r'
S-~ 1 E k1114\t\~\\Z~~Sv fro u ` \ ~~`r'~
1 ~
a i OIa, 1 lK
111 a a
\Ev\ IIt \ Ey~i Y~\
! i 11 i S 1 ~ s\ a` ~x tv\ ,e
0
I
I
i
STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS
Opsretlone, 1992 1998 Si ~hanec
Blectrbr
Net Energy to System 838,61% 939,926 •0.13%
Elactrio Sales • Denton (MWH) 802,177 908,099 •0,43%
Eloolrio Sales ON System (MWH) 70,880 82,481 14,07%
Etectrlo System Peak (MW) 229 219 4.67%
Number of Ekx%lo Customers 32,686 31,604 3.11%
webr:
Raw Water pumped (1,000 Gets) 4,142,612 6,181,468 •4.80°4
Pinlshad Water Pumped (1,000 Gals) 4,868,282 4,940,671 •5.81%
Water Sales (1,000 Gals) 4,610,454 4,797,411 •3.90%
Water Syetam Peak (MOD) 24.78 26.81 4.07%
Number of Wafer Customers 17,287 16,850 2.80%
Wastewater:
Wastewater Influent Treated (1,000 Gals) 4,640,004 3,965,984 17.02%
Wastewater Volume Billed (1,000 Gals) 2,882,605 3,100,761 •7.04%
Wastewater EftlueM Treated (1,000 Gals) 4,472,010 3,777,128 18.40%
Wastewater Influent Peak (MGD) 26.18 17,94 46.9314
Wastewater EHlusnt Pssk (MOD) 21.08 $4.42 40.10%
Number of Wastewater Cuslomers 17,270 16,885 2.20%
Solid Waster
Gross Cublo Yardage 551,371 478,910 16.13%
Cublo Yardage Landfillod 452,499 417,174 8.47%
Number of Solid Waste Customers 18,861 18,385 2.69%
U111ky,
Total Ulllity Manhours 692,487 888,245 -0.83%
Pinaholalr
D01I818 1,000)
Rats Revenues $03,695 $91,673 2"10%
Total Revenues $$04,349 $101,195 3,12%
Operating Expenses $71,718 $71,131 083%
® Total Expenses $94,660 $93,061 161% Q
is Credit Raiingl
Standard 8 Pool's Colporatlon A+ A+
Moody's Investoro Service All Al
r
32
i
i
i
I
o
{ MISCELLANFOUS STATISTICAL DATA
1
Percent of
fY. 1097 Soft lee rte C elUAft AnnualliWH ired& PA".KYi
University of North Taxes 84,410,412 9.36% 18,149
Pelerblll 35,037,761 195% A,380
Taxes Women's University 32,784,091 3,63% 8,243
City of Denton 29,221,474 3.24% 11,035
1'elra Pak 21,087,200 2,34% 4,368
Donlon Independent School District t8,878,487 1.85% 9,881
Donlon Regional Modfcal Center 11,929,937 1.32% 2,087
Donlon Slate School 11,902,490 1.32% 3,433
Victor Equipment 11,283,410 1126% 2,842
ACME Stick 10.846.82.9 1.1$°619 3,t08
265,668,081 29,44°/9
t
Percent of
p,Y, Auj G"Alar Cuetomefe Aopu8l d~ Water galas
Upper Trinlty Regional Water OWrlot ' 732,900,000 16,W/#
Unlvetslly of North Texas 194280,670 4.32%
Coy of Denton 162,636,620 3.316/°
Texas Woman's University 148020,050 3.21%
Denton independent School District 47,483,660 1,03%
Pe161bill 41 393,350 090%
Lakewood Estates 49,218,500 1,07°l0
Denton State School 68,476,600 1.27%
Clayton Homo$ 40,081,000 0.870/.
Woodhill Aparimenls 32.88B.ZOS! 0116E
Wholesale Customer 1,602,313,040 32.68%
audgelfiLW fka..Yesu ie.hle waw l1ae~atelec solid Walla I
1997 143 64 7 67.4 67,1
1098 1408 6518 84,6 05.0
1895 143.6 65,6 62.7 86.0
1994 138.6 66,6 012 63,0
1993 142.8 88A 82.1 68.4
1092 148.3 65.8 60.6 68.3
1891 145.8 62.0 68.6 49.0
Adminlslrelive R01 and Debt
It1L4Ge119t11lIlUe_.99dt..AAU Tratislera S`usei.Eanlel 6ad.Oeh1 Suylc
1997 3,801,829 6,621,882 316,657 11,791,039
WOO 3,891,346 6,602,340 397,465 11,932,027
1996 3,405,801 6,391,889 3x8,202 0,271;000
1994 3,311,088 4,666,649 281,469 01891,000
1983 3,288,070 4,076,573 211,004 9,729,602
1992 3,096,236 4,016,700 237,203 10,oil,640
1001 3,046,893 3143,861 43,491 9,861,006
Rainfall Average
AWGe1W1eQIle sssWUeal ntlA P.Opu19110n (lnnhael Tome ra slurs (Degrees)
1997 71,460 44.65 83,70
1998 70,637 36,25 04 90
O e
1995 69,b50 35,29 64.02
1994 08,060 58.40 63.78
1993 07,422 38.09 03.10
1092 60,902 34.31 63.93
1991 66,470 49.47 64.36
3.1
0
ELECTRIC STATISTICS
ENohks 1991 ]392 ]8~4 18@9 1895 199& 1892
Numb*( nl Monthly Customers
Residential 23,654 24,171 24,468 26,822 26,463 26,886 27,624 ,
Commercial 2,968 3,132 3,139 3,218 3,280 31310 3,382
Industrial 26 29 62 71 73 77 64
Govemmeni al 169 170 171 174 166 175 193
Other Me 205 216 1,105 11108 1,165 1,303 j
Total 26,903 27,706 28,066 30,388 31,000 31,805 32,686
i
I
Annual Peek MIN 160 177 100 202 211 219 229
Annual Megawatt Hours
H denlial 261,732 266,483 283,571 289.612 295,631 3$8,604 312,621
Commercial 241,163 237,681 173,344 166,884 168,703 170,660 171345
Indwirial. 226,203 24043 320,823 346,395 300,326 374,611 365,404. ,
Oovomrecntal 42,863 26,186 29,496 31,271 32,721 28,777 23,440
Other 7,397 6,614 8,853 61864 6,673 7,421 8,466
Total 778,378 767,009 814,087 841,026 864,253 906,099 902,176
Annual Revenue (0 x 1,000)
Aritdential $20,049 $10,265 520,998 $22.406 $22,440 524,107 26,224
Commercial 18,145 17,309 12,931 13,201 13,189 13,280 13,447
IrNuetriol 12,056 12,631 16,231 18,465 18,383 19,821 20,634
Governmental 2,979 2,010 2,037 2,356 2,398 2,119 1,895
Other $87 648 660 710 710 717 999
Total $54,917 551,762. 55200 $51,147 $571132 $60,103 562,199
Canis 7 KWH
nosidenlial 8.00 7.64 7.40 7.74 7.59 7.67 6.07
Commerctal 7,62 7.28 7.46 701 7,02 1,62 7.65
Industrial 5.33. 6420 6.08 633 6.10 6.20 6.35
Oovemmenlal 6.05 7.68 0.91 7.53 7.33 7.36 848
Other 920 9.95 9.62 10.47 10.42 10.47 10.68
Total 743 0.75 0.49 6.79 6.61 6.03 6.89
Average Monthly Df11
H9sidontlal $74.12 $80.36. $71,61 $7231 $70.69 $74.11 79.10
e Commercial 609.53 400,57 34190 34207 335.06 334.37 331.34
Industrial 38$1606 38,008.02 21,023.97 21,072.154 21,106.18 21,404.77 20,409.11
novorninentat t,467.69 950.19 095.50 1,128.35 1,201,29 1,009.88 819.99
Other 307.30 263.05 264.86 64.22 63.85 6v.00 $3.88
Total $169.80 $15566 $167.02 $166.71 $163.14 $168.49 5159.07
k
J
34 Note, For FY. 1994 8 forward, the 'Other' cuslomat count now IMkKI" IM LT 1408 Nk LID, L9, and DO ratae.
}ry - -r
w
Nfi
WATER STATISTICS
€ water 1991 1882 1893 AM 18>~ 1886 18~Z
Number 01 Monthly CuMonwa
Resk1en11al 13,873 14,193 14;444 13,888 13,898 14,253 t4,674
Commelclol 2,232 21288 2,308 2,345 2,369 2,419 21622
00Valnmontal 115 120 122 lei 161 175 189
Wholesale 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
3. Other 1 1 1 i 1 4
Total 16,223 16,684 16,877 18,177 16.421 18,850 17,287
Annual Peak Day (MOD) 2387 18.97 24.24 20,31 22,76 26481 24,76
Annual Gallons Conaamrid (x 1000)
Aaeldontlal 1,604,193 1,419,883 1,000,990 1,466,831 1,629,412 1,825,401 f06,037
Commercial 210621897 1,828,693 2,044,487 1,098,714 .2,060,643 2,229,799 2,140,001
Governmental 105,118 104,371 161,819 139,603 143,40 176,330 1211217
Wholesale 351,662 336,761 $24,244 392,647 611298 666,877 609,100
Other 0 0 10306 43,964 0 204 2231800
Total 4,023,870 3,789,628 4,285,245 4,037,769 4,235,245 ;,797,411 4,809.464
Annual Revenue
Res denllal 54,487,070 S4,90f,972 $5,822,394 $$.$89,903 $5,840,202 68,164,640 $0.6",219
Commerclal 5,123,600 8,465,379 8,058,687 .8,303,302 6,689,680 7,309,306 1,090,499
Governmental 229,816 3$3,478 479,317 432,461 455,227 846,604 448,663
Wholesale '175,783 771,645 764,180 114,689 640,045 709,833 672,948
00101 (Raw) 0 0 231,196 64,647 0 2,172 120,688
Total $10,616,980 $11,442,374 $13,085,614 $13,105,062 $13,642,331 $16,327,767 $14,700,211
$ Per 1060 Gallons
Residonllal $2.93 $3.45 53.61 $3.81 $3,62 $1.10 $3.97
Commor6al 2.48 283 2.96 3.16 331 338 3.31
Oovemmenial 2.16 300 3.18 3110 3117 3111 3.42
Wholesale 231 2,29 2.17 1.82 1.27 148 1.32
Other 0.00 0.00 1.41 1.48 0400 10.65 0.64
'tole! $2.64 $3,02 53.08 $3.26 $3,20 5320 $3.19
Ayerage Monthly Bill
' Resldenlfal $26.95 $2818 $32.44 $1446 05.07 $30.58 $36.47
Commefelal 101,29 200.47 21877 223188 292,76 261,70 234.00
Oovemmenlal 166.16 217464 326.85 224.31 236.02 200,56 191,01
Wholesale 32,324,29 32,147,71 29,340.83 26,485.62 21,043.64 29,678.38 28,039.60
01her 0.00 0.00 19,288.33 6,403,02 0.00 181,00 10,067.53
Total $54.63 $57.60 $64.66 587,61 $68.72 $76.81 $70.86
~I Q
38
.j~ 'y~' F4( M ,Irv, 4 ~rl {rI
s •s ~ a~d~,iir.i~~W~)i4~'. 4=
0
WASTEWATER STATISTICS
waetewaf« 1Bn1 l IM I im lane IM
Numbsr of Monthly Cuatomen
Reaklemlal .14,365 14,634 14,778 13,985 14,204 14,644 14,866
Commercial 2,121 2,087. 2,122 2,150 2,171 2,241 2,309 ^
00vemmenlal 89 85 87 87 87 95 100
Wholesale 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Other 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 18,680 16,712 16,992 16.227 16.467 1605 17,270
Annual Qallone WNW
Hosklenlial 1,004,910 1,054,480 05,703 1,014,660 959,364 1,047,718 931;416
Commercial 1,524,453 1,367,713 1,442,628 1,601,876 1,616,677 1,552,430 1,637,465
Oovemmenlal 61,278 42,389 61,769 64,585 64,978 81,543 $5,462
Wholesale 133,234 169,822 167,038 178,600 202,661 186,200 187,303
Other 118,635 98,603 60,740 195,805 273,650 263,771 170,840
Total 2,80.608 2,142,967 2,707,850 2,943,625 3,006,028 3,101,761 2,882,605
Annual Revenue l
Residential $2,208,850 $2,664,001 $2,767,094 $3,140,224 $3,449,800 .$3,563,909 $3,509,983
Commercial ?,941,303 3,352,791 4,011,221 4,649,107 6,162,179 6,400,705 6,384,152
06vermnenlal 82,727 01,900 126,381 147,246 157,966 187,059 173,677
Wholesale 208,200 344,985 309,449 333,372. 393,908 366,698 369,377
Other (IrMUS1081) 96,670 06,398 65,609 226,980 334,615 206,616 228,618 {
Total $5,707,620 $6,440,185 $7.281,654 $8,497,010 $9,519,066 $9,797,685 $9,683,607
5 Per 1000 00110110
n6sldeollal $2.16 $2.42 $2.77 $3.09 $3.60 5319 $3,71
commorclot 1193 2.42 2178 5110 3.42 3.46 3.60
Oovemmonlal 1.61 2.17 2.48 210 2.87 3.05 3.13
Wlwlesala 2.16 2118 1185 1.80 1.04 1.98 2.08
Other 0.83. 0.98 1.09 1116 1.22 1.14 1433
Total $1.97 $215. $2.88 $2.89 $3.17 !3.16 $9.36
Average Monthly 0111
nosldenlfal $13.33. $14,64 $16.55 $18.71 $2024 ' $110.36 $19.69
Cemmerclol 11646 133.85 157,50 18023 198,94 200.82 104431
Qovommenlal 71.46 89.03 123.43 141,04 ibf,31 1£4.01. 14437
Wholesale 6,008.21 7,187.19 6,446.85 6,945.25 8,208.36 71639.60 8,112.02
Other 0,046.00 8,033.17 4,625.73 18,815.00 27,884.66: 24,051,33 18,884.63
. Total 629.89 E32.11 $35.81 $43.64 $40.17 E40.38 546.73
i
30
I
i
fr~f~ r rvt+ i t r w r, ~ {
F
113
,
- Z
- I
L
I
SOLID WASTE STATISTICS
I
"Id waab 199 IM 1849 IM im i99B 1ffi
Numbor of Monthly Cuafom4ra
Resldentlal 15,038 16,189 16,348 16,499 15,654 15,698 16,068 .
Commercial 11100 1,345 1,720 1,746 1,764 2,308 2,361 "
Disposal 631 698 828 999 678 J79 431
Total 16,769 17,232 17,904 18,244 17,987 18,385 18,861
Oross Cublo Yards
ResldenAal 70,116 72,651 78,808 106,608 120,738 142,107 149,474
Commercial 193,298 241,696 310,723. 340,716 $21,160 319,861 359,026
otsposal 92,769 63,895 76,182 114,027.. 60,866 48,021 41,972
Total 364,172 378,161 462,711 563,351 602,688 610,070 5$1,371
Annual Cublo Yards Landllikd
flesldential 78,116 72,661 68,693 65,474 67,168 57,355 67,386
Commerclal 193,296 241,695 310,723 340,146 318,784 311,798 363,182
01sposal 92,769 63,895 781182 114,027. 801888. 48,021 41,072
Total .364,172 378,161 465,698 619,646 438,800 417,174 462,499
Recycled Cublo Yards
Aesldenlw 0 0 7,113 43,134 63,670 $4,842 85,348
Commercial 0 0 0 bit 2,396 8,063 8,783
Disposal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 7,113 43,706 661968 92,005 02,109
Annual Revenue
Resldenllal 91,700,139 $1,802,477 $1,954,422 $2,130,166 $2,316,026 $2,680,442 $2,620,80
Commercial 1,616,674 1,769,169 2,303,170 $2,426,972 21778,598 31305,066 3781,017.
otsposai 287,042 198,947 238,042 $667,879 4$8,309 378,308 395,268
Total $3,494,65S $3,761,083 $4,406,643 56,227,037 $5,6611933. $8,243,838 $808,088
$ Cublo Yard Landfllled
neslaenlial $21.76 $24.81 $28.45 932.63 $40.60 $44.64 $45.84
Commo1c;al 7.85 7.28. 7.41 7.14 8172 10,60 1031
Disposal 2 60 3111 3.12 -6,86 8.05 7.88 9.42
Tmal $057 $9.95 $9.87 $10,06 $12.79 $14.97 $16.04
e Awsoe Monthly ON
Dosklontlal $0.42 $9.89 $10.61 $11,45 $12.32 $13.69 $13,M
Commercial 114.90 100.00 111.01 116,93 131.28 110.33 133,46
Dtspwal 35.37 23.76 23.03 65.71.. 10423 83118 - 78.36
Total $17,32 $10,10 $20.02 $23.88 $26.85 $26.30 $30.07
p
s
FLEET SERVICES DEPARTMENT H1-LIGHTS
"Retalned earnings
were positive in 1997.'
Fleet Services maintains over 600 Financial Performance Excellent
City vehicles ensuring that each
City department can provide The Fleet Services Department achieved a large degree of financial
essential services to the citizens success in 1997 by earning a positive net income that erased a retained
of Denton. earnings deficit, Total revenues of $2.196 million were $232,022 below
budget (9,5%) but total CAR expenses of $2,028 million were
$412,9)4 (16.9%) below budget, This combination provided a net
income of $168,392 and a positive retained earnings of $154,432,
I
New Vehicle Warranty Program Implemented
A new concept in vehicle maintenance was developed in 1997 that
closely resembles an HIY10 insurance programs. Each department
budgets a specific amount ofvehicle maintenance dollars that covers
"Jack Jarvis also provided all normal maintenance requirements during the fiscal year, regardless
0 professional vehicle of how many times maintenance service is needed, Lake an HMO, the
maintenance service to incentive for regular preventative maintenance activities should reduce
customers with Garage labor
rates 16% below the overall vehicle maintenance costs over the lifetime of each vehicle,
prevailing rates In the area,
congratulations to Jack Fleet Services 0 Jarvis for a job well done) Superintendent Retires ,r
Jack Jarvis, Superintendent of Fleet Services, retired after 18 years of
service to the City of Denton, During this period, he managed the
Garage, Machine Shop, Parts and Fuel divisions and also administered
the Motor Pool fund, Jack was responsible for budget close to $5.5
38 million and the care of over 600 city vehicles.
t,4 , yr
I
r
E
i
a
,
. y r} `~.!~4 ++ee tt do i
I:#1
if Vt~
• I 1F ~ 3,, 1 ~ ~ 1 , 'i
f:t
it ; t r rrsa >~Illl...{l
fl:
r '
irl I I
•r I,
I
itlnli ? 2 ~i . •i, f I i
x t,
' ria i s~£1o s1~{, 4l f, ti, 1 _1
13
FINANCIAL >
rs
STATEMENTS ; ';~:l x'Y 'MR
~ jf S )7 ,f 2
. I { t 1 i ~ .f3 r r TF
v I J<tf a~ ,emn.
4-1~1411
If
111 11.11+) 11 r1V ! k i?
1111~~11.~1
K l
Y
~sx
i - " irC 1101,13 11 t1i~1f~
ilw
i ,tun )ro,Cl d.0.♦ ~f a~ 2!X FfiF )
} * l1 i t~ 1.1~~UV~a.,y~.y,11f ?¢<)~;;7~ x
"L 'l EI F b\~ 11111!.;.!4:'+tiJ,~.1~ A x~i~::: I' ` p~f1
z. r I appt /~./t4F.~`a. )t ~ '•,c,
1 ~~//t1~ \aYy3(`y ~Q, bra 'xp~
q 1 I / f ~ i , j~ ~ + t1~10'~ifSf•?~' ~ ~V' ~.ap~
JJ
39
R ,Ir r' ,tier
1 t ...Y y. YEA ~TP rf)1~J ,1 '~I~ ~ , I
,•4...~ f-itu~aY.~u.....•~•wY~aw --~-1W~r3 } ,4(f~~
0
BALANCE SHEET
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (unaudited)
r eefrie wauf
A96t'f8r
Cools end deposes 10 f202,r03
Imglmems 0 603,335
ftoHNades ("0 Wowaixes lw uM04ec96tea)
Aa is 5,005;258 0 ,
UnbOd Orly "Wit 4,569,834 1,104,038
Accnrdd Mersa( 656,991 82,501
00m1 1093,419 1,015
I NO Ilan mhdr lands 315.903 9.9%
Mcaust& a lwomory 691,107 0 1
Pfep&d dame 0 0
Deaened bond 1110 6 MIS 351,081 ,660,405
Halldcled assets
cuA end deposes 416.006 2,900,326
Imroskrwls 01.094,691 10,640.124
Accn»d wamsl 59,181 145,014
At 6W$ Re<elvat4d 1,968,746 0
Due hm mbef furda 0 0
MY" 10 odrof kids, 3,181,764 0
FIAed easels InelNeecwnWMed depredabani 44,205.440 02,020,052
Will At"" 1261119 06 7,581,179. +l
LIA91UTIe8 AND MD XQU1T9 1
LIA01LM1191 111
AoWgms payable end acuwd e7pMees 08,452,251, 1340,228
Relaklape payable 0 0
ACtotWafed "Ild <Ompensalw AbSO406 MAN 1064511
Deposes 1,160.424 0
Payabla hom 1611dded 0800
AorounU payeble end eocnm dspeme! 0 131,521
RB7Nne" payable 0 0
" Io Odsof Inds 0 0
Ae<nsod IFAwos1 333,690 074,123 f
C.Revenue and general bbagaWn bonds payable 1,931,700 7699,133
Dw to aM1 fonds 88,041 22,155
Adva" from Olhof Fwit 0 0
Oameal DUl aiion bonds payable 0 0
H4vem bads payaVd 10,360,214 40,312,919
Nos P9yabo 6 51,210,934
69Usaudlp051Ucsul6 Cosl 0 _ 0
Will 1.IabIII1Me ~ 29,654,195 91.771.244
FUND EDU11y!
(w6b0ed dapl:Y-
From other MROPasL'es of govern IAI m4s I3A60 6342
In ak1 or w4tw on 1430 .lli 14654259
Lose. Au Oafod defKeda4on __L9B,8)y X8254
Nei awersbuled coptel 42),939 9,605,915
Helatnas eamigs (dole )
W.dened (or bmd falvernml 3,052,791 6342,990
R411thm lot !Mull, DIP 1,959,411 0
nos6N06 101 work In progress 0 q
R09dNed IN 'Apilal o<nsUwvw . ..600.000 250.000
flo."Ned IV lanmal fowwoM 0. 0
rt4mfwd fm MA (acram6ni
71esemd Iw. dmvslef fepla<emenl 0 0 r.
P RestlSCd IV file slablUsflon 51.30¢000 2,750,000
Redowd Ior wating opllel 1,633,000 310,000
Rearmed 1w emergency 4,083,000 796,000
9450tv4d 101 wales low4r 0 750,000
11686lved ref waled wdaa 0 0
Reserved Iw SANA7 pf0tads 0 6,703,097
FW*N4d 161 Lonwo"my 0 500,000
A0e6r3 la Wf90trUdue finandng 0 1.000.900
UA Orold (defied) 4 _53,70,624 01 !72 10 2
Told! RMAWAd 6ilrrings 08,101,315,. 28,964,1 to
Total Fund tpJfy jDaIdt) 9961 A,270 J 3560934_
toll LIWIPMe aw Fund [quay u IPA189.465 117,381,118
r
40
1 : r5 ;7
Y lo
a ti
an ri
r
BALANCE SHEET
SEPTEMBER 30, 1947 (unsuditd)
t 6Y64Mw6Mr "m w44N
A6un:
cmh Or X1
1 oa,oo w216e
m4ov dM lalM46owY1t14 br wfW64c8614)
AtcowU D °
U1bd4d Wry eirv4N 806.918 071,6b2
Maud VMN4 68.188 D
01W 16.238 43.636
Out Ilonr ww twdi 0 8,640
mofthwfdrw 6n6y&y 0 24,712
Prow OMU 0 0
' D"r*d bond Woms6s top% 206.421 0
ptwk4d 6"w
CMh rd depatlN 1.101.306 901,016
rn,.46rNnti 6.000,64 1.9k,126
AODU66 Wo" 44,400 68,11W
AOONM R600v66U
Due 6o0 o6w hrd6 0 0
f Adwnp k 0" KA& 0 0
i Fixed MMU (nN 6I6xwr"#W depredogoh) 21,00.621 6 1103,*0,
low A6644 IO.IS5,923 1 ,401,/0
UASlu1106 AND FUW EOUIYY
UA0IUTIMI l
A"j* pg46N 6M 6aonud #4~ 6977900 401,165. 1
Re16h6ge WY•We ° 0
Awur "Nd WOW WkO"OW 6W6atM 131,161 124,146
o"Nom 0 °
POY" rtW f"M6d 61041
ACCaNJ P&r" 6M 6WArd NA44M 76.701 19,101
Adwr lp p6Y6W6 ° 0
Duo to 4her VM 0 0
AOaued MIMI 39.1,151 65.610
C, ROVMU6 W gon4n1 oWgotM bo(sde p6YeWo 043,167 MAC
Doe 10 6NI hede 223,140 69.065
AdvWo from O1W Fwd! 3,000000 761,164
0 7.61 T.056
6en414 obNOW bong 14Y654
Novenae W4s poleli4 16,186206 °
N016 paYeNe 0 21296
061a 11$6 ld6tuN Cwt 0 1.421,32°
tali) LNb11MNi ?0,153,236 11216,203
FUND COUITYI
C Idmw papeal
Ffoln w her mvkpsK" w govo6lm mal UMt 00,0),099 0
uI ad 4 G8814b1Ad 11,"2,426 0
Lest. Ac AAien depredation 140,266128). .D.
N4 CmArbod daplal 7.046.723 0
fleNned bum" tdetital'
Reioved Nr bold IebrenKM 2.563,764 0
Re3elve4 for We Clp 0
NewroW for wax in pr(orees 4AISA40
Ree4w for (Ipllw "4vte 150000 60.000 .
` . R4ervool IN lam" wwimot 0 060,08
R6eewtd for debt IeUf&nem 0 367160
Re/arvM fur ddngslw r&Au,, 4d 0 16000
R46N#d MI 1916 911NFta60n 800,000 WOO
Reibrad IN ON" tapY4 211,000 146400
pmaved IN oftwomey 9A 4.00 373,000
RHINO for w6161 towN 0 0
0146Ned 001 W014 We60 0 0
Flo-.mod IN tamil pol"i 21 9.3" 160,000
Rodmd la mrM6,my .
! R4erved Ia InbellniUweSnandrq I,000A06 0
i~ b'nree6Wad (6600) I , BI2 .170'",401
TOW noi*od EwrMp 2211419662 4,261.625
144 rwW EOJfY (oppo 26412,465 4201 03 •
'1014 LNWIRW MW rurld ttlu" 49,188,023 Ib
41
..9, r~S 3k lrh 1fI % r ~•y 4" ! 7.. Y 6 x
l
32
'a~ .,uLRrv„tr, er e ~
r ~
Q
I
M1
~k
BALANCE SHEET
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (unaudited)
Taw Yell 11141041
S"Mwb r 30, 10#1 Sophie nbae 30, 1910
ASSETS:
Cash ell do ogm 1204,703 1874,900
hvesmknle 2,180,923. 0,066,00
naoaN4Nac Ines o all"W"S M twolacobba)
AKOU11s 8,005,236 8,078,944
unN9W IAAIy Nuke 6.176,30 51662,608 ~
Accneld hnresl 100.50 - 1,016,955
01::,1 1,125,266 610323
Due Iran 4Owv rods 32$.346. 104,703
LwrNanAlA mmlwy 122,419 941,406
PfafWd dams 0 1,636
DAlaned bond bsuae" Call 1,138.796. 1,221,226
Ito orkled Asaeh
Cash and dermils 5.763.351 3,434.219
Invelsmet i 00,039,014 01,941,144
04cf wd 104"1 30,201 351.012
Au"I neaNAble 1,968,140 0
Due Irdm OUNI. fulls 0 8,833,7/9
Memo to o0wr Amble 3,791384 4,831,184
1,502,154
'Fled AUAU (not 01 ecw,,. Med&PredabOA) 101,199,515 ---L?
TAM A1selA 300,303,392 30!.301, 229
LIABILITIES ANO FUND EQUITY
VAUILITIEB;
Ac I$ W11,18 and aOMW eaperwea 1Y,274.664 61408,803
Re4e9wgo pAYa51e. 0 11.148
A0tt 0816d ui0eld c O mliad ebaMtel 760,811 V7.074
DO W& LVo6,424 1,158,161
Payable I(om aArkled .dots - 0
Aso" PaYWO ell atCA" a406elt" Moll 142,038
nelou" Payable 0 42,502
Due to ouwt lurm 0 0
Atmod Werasl .1.699,918 110110.489
C. nay" and g4nerol Okp Wn toads payable 8,01 A.68V 0.000.632 .
Due to other funds 304,372 0,3611,221
Advance Isom Other Funds 3381,284 4,031,181
0eneral 009001 bonds PAYAW 7,017,968 130.811
nevenue ball/ paywo 16.610.001 91.013.851
We PAYANO )1,241,203 J1,500,764
ClOure 7 Posl0muro coal 1,424,320 2,90OMi
Tola11.41411141 14014 310 W 42021
FUND EQUITY:
COrd,IblAAd ceptAl. ,
1
fran olhe/ mWocipmes m 9ov*v ONal we 14.1709.024. 14,000.614
In AA o. e"rudw 2106,305 25,874,101
LOS! M irydalad of"WOu0n :26,410 544 µ„-„___011, 4,1119)
Not ooWinded (OPAAI : 14,076,477. 14,299,112
nlUlnr!d 6uaan9afdafCk)•
AilWed for blxd uSimml 17,648.845 12,802,451
nseorved for Muff CIP 1,059,411 0 -
nasarvod for woo in pdvs" 015,049 0
naerved tot w6l p0foda 1,060,000 0
n"irm for mrolil 1016mom W,016 456,916
i.. nose rued ter bleb4 foramen, WOO 301100 I
Ra4ne1 for blur "or moatrmenl 76000 760W II
Rel4nhl to rota SIMWIaMi 55.550.000 45.932000
nasAlnd IN Wood" ce0161 2,300.OW 2.153000
Reserved fm emergency - 6716,rj00 6,384,OW
nwrlm lot Abler I6Ae1 760,000 650,070 .
nelil fov W6Ie1 Well 0 1
nesan~s6 la oaOOal pyecll 8,41J,243 17,398,101
Reserved loo o"Agency 700,000 0
ness"d la WrbshKIUl lea" 2,0W,000 1,11MOW
Udfebenkd (datitN) 66 .112 ,,4_~~ 163
Total ROU160 eaminps 163.82d,b 5 134,851,988.
Too Fund Equity (DeOdt) 187890 612 140,1_.60.200
Tool L7Ab4111N AM FuM E4u7Iy 300,303,792 ~302.W2.2f
42
I
,e ; ~ 1,
32
!
I
j
{
4
STATEMENT OF REVENUES 8 EXPENSES
AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
FISCAL YEAR 1887 (unaudited)
i
(
EIIlUb wow
OPERATRIO REVENUES:
beewd fierce $72.0418,310 so
"
Via* "Nn :Q O 14,700,321
Wlslowoter urge o 0
CnLg6e IN ON"$ 617,115 0.
S0 (ky 0 46,741
Tom DPC4160 Revenues 12,465661 14,718,062
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Pumshod Party 38,974,024 510,269
Fuot 6.763.010 0
Pv, I"so of "ter 0 17,227
swrMS IM we9es 6,103.716 21"1,709
M11a11416 end ugp,af 761,300 638,376
tAanlenLK/ Ltd repair/ 1,152,977 730,1(0
uwanaldl 3,201,309 2.268,921
CIOf O0611010SUre Cost 0 0
Adm"wetrea Colt 6140 692 11994,19)
Wc00L,eaus 3,630192 441,296
T09e1 Operelaq Erpenle! 64.000,117 8711.601
OPeraing W-we 8.565,31/ 6.001.265
Nf1NOPERATM REVENUES (EXPENSES):
IniOroll Wove J,501,5R2 1,1WSW
Inldresl oxwoo end Wail 0Nlrgal 15,09),253) (3.052.001)
EXher [17!,1£81 62,910
1`4101 Notk",814y RCVMu1S (ArpoI 2,236,800 (1,171./861
Nwo 8010ro Oparaing 7pUErs
f0.021,tifl /,229.758
operevp 1rs0UWl In 0 O
OPeratng Tmoefen Out (3,631,014). (22d 651
70161 OFeraln0 T'44014 In 1000 (3.091,9+6} 122.165)
FXTRAOFI NNARY ITEM
E07e M 001undng of MM! 0 0
Nil 1A00rM 71129,200 1,201,611
Fued Alsels (2,105,609) 11,261,31!)
Pow P,Wvl (+.950107) (2.690.809)
CAPA6"01 E)PO 61 (8126") (60662)
A"rew Adrvllmea 0 0.
CWwo AdNAnenl 0 0
s Celli NO how 6131.061. 2,432,890
AN 00preouliol of filed moms 85.070 MOSS[
+ a17ae6d with CM11411ANd Gp9al
P Inudilf In 16126W earnngs 71181,278 1.8A 1,162
ROMEO EMNIN00 (DEFICIT) • 10101"6 92,001,053 24,098957
Adwllmenl 01 TnW Aisdo 0 0
)WAR7EO EARN0105 (OEFIOR) , 0041 99,191,331 £8,064,119
j
AWAI
Told 1n00ms 76,180,213 10,023,674
Tdd1 ACCNiI EaPense 69,010.013 51,818903 ^
1 7,1£9,200 1,207,611 tY
'i CesN,
valid W6" 16,1111 13 18023,614
low CNA E!8£M9 7071„mf 10 1J600,W_
4 6,81,001 _ 2.432
43
r n ,c i Y
r - .
f
0
U
STATEMENT OF REVENUES & EXPENSES
AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
FISCAL YEAR W (unaudited)
wwbrow 694Id W"M
ovEaAr174b aevENUE9: r '
Ekdrb feNde $0 f0 ,
0 0
Whiff 10M14rB
W010Wa11 It"$ 9,909.007 0
CAalpef IN n1v6ea 6 8919.010
sundry .32136 10010
T"I Op/ralg R winis 9,927010 7,030,129
OPERATING E%PE1,1686:
Pufml,wd P6"l 400174 0
Fuel J3.3M 0
0 0
pu R3e119 d "lei
sAarea end m"A 2,120.090 2,187,104
11a14'N1fa0d auppEe4 231,796 331,917
010,600
MAnlananre and 10AV4 we )03
pprpegpp, 1.493,697 16),79/
Gbfure /pwldmure cot 0 110.764
Adm'utif6alh'0 Col USIA" 761,696
W400r'e1400u4 617,909 939,060
Taal C"falnq OwIts 6.071 A74 6110420
Operve4 fmom0 3.0'.3.163 5870101.
N040P FLATWO a6VEWAS (6091190611
NV451 rOWU4 382.)60 413,752
InWall erperae And Wdl mery06 15090.6847 (3909621
qhm (61,4.11 5680,610
total N0ne434rela4 ptanu41 (F fpemO 1179,746) 1.646 300
in0orne 0410.0 "wing .milers 2610.124 3.382.001
0p01al+* Tr640014 In 6 0
0"I'ing IWONa OBI. 1227.110) (59,0601
tae1 001Alnp W441e14 In (00) . !223,1401 (59.086)
EA IRA0P01NMY ITEM.
LOH an r0!wN.rg OI bonds 0 0
1101 Into" 2147284 3.)22.921
Fa A4sol4 (4340251 1799.061)
OW 2hn"al 1977.6131 135r7,N;d)
06pAll. i W%et (111414) 0.
k, , Auyuilm, (t,riCO 1111! 150 ow)
GnsuoFAlutlmer 0 (1,574 05)
CIA 1401 he fw 87100 11102275
Add Oeur& 1, uI fund a14411 I, IM }3/ 0
arqu rod nah to6r, led c17061
by eau In rela ned Wr gf 3,416379 3.)22,421
X07.311400 EAb1AN69 /OEMIT) 10MIf98 17,975364 9501u2
A,Imtni4nI of FAM ASIe14 0 0
JiEtAINEO EARNIN09 1bEMrt) , W MI 21,VA,462 1,181,023
Aww1.
i TC44I Intomo 10.04,393 9,110.391
total Aftvil E7penfe 6,161,109 6,933,470
,.1 2.30 284 3,322,921
Oelh. - '
, I Y6101 loco 5e 1001,303 f, so 1.3%
Imol carom t2wit 9041354 6A29,121
623,030 1,104,216
44
I
i
,C . ~f fir'>I '1'R 342
d. t
s?Y~;lFYu1 •
d
STATEMENT OF REVENUES & EXPENSES
AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
FISCAL YEAR 1947 (unaludltsd)
Yew Yw Enwd r
Is"kn6sr 30, IW epNr" 30.1x01
OPEM+940 AE it"Ill
EWrN $V%A !72,04,518 669.S~J.IaO
Walt' aamna 14,100,321 16.326,386
Wo l"bly orvfcs `B.W.607 9,1191.80
C!rarp o lv itr*" t:66e,ibe 0,x30,U6
Sods, 110,193 129.045
Taal V*AGnp Na WM 104.863#95 101,1111,111/
OPEIIATNAO EXPENSE6:
41.4x9.061
Puroha Nd Pews 3944,001
rut' Voi.3ea 8,961,NS
Puf"Jo d wife 17,211 aom
Sa11d46 old w6pes 51,909.079 11.301x69
N16166616 IN sv,,4t 1,969.370 1,910,016
M&WONA s, and foo0a 3,510,116 3,/1T.9S4
Dep "*l 1.161.197 /,611,06
Obfuff I Noctimv coil 116,164 954:%.
Adm6081bs Cep 11,161,272 0,45,701
Nnal!snsws 5,332,017 4,050.20
tole oporsi" bwol BA,001,956 66.319.166
00&61.2 INO/na 19,171,('119 16169.751
11040M11AI1NC REVENUES (EX"N9E6):
101Af411 revenue 6720,2#6 3,350.953
1610111 lkW" and hual Nvoss 16.729.000) [7,346)01)
01Mr 1,631.260 139.160}
Teal tl&,WfalNW flersnuas (Efpeme) 021160 1t.030,92b)
ww# wafe 004fatno Tmnalvs 21,003,303 13#11.630
cwlal v2 Tranf190 1n 0 0
opelimo 'franalers W (3,998269) fiia.Blq
lolal owmirg 7fanfWra in i0N1 13,9982") - fil0.elq
FX7NAON04NAAV IIEN:
Loft a refooAl 0 b,Mf. 0 0
Not lnfa+ra 17.0010 +9,0439;04!0
rued MAI$ (4.820092) 15.49,5681
oeu Pmcbal (0F16,413) N.e59,Jeo1
Capoood Egenlos f1b2391S1 13 #.98q
Aawal AdlustmsN 0 766.x01
OOPM Adjul"W4 11.594,9951. 0
tN '1 clsh W lmcO . 11.619.366 02U,30Y
Add. tlopwla6m d food afsols 1.085923 1,161303
~a al"o wan cWvwsd upul
9 Mass h e6lWed eW"t 15812/139 104#26.708
NETAINEO EA"WS (C)MCIT) • 10+014 134951,098 190,624,811
AdNNmM1 0 Food Molt 0 0
RETAMO EA1 Nis (6EFICAl • 970!97 16362403S 134,"1.00
Aclrud
( fotil Wome 111,131461 101.!82,001
Tua1 AWJAI Efpeeso 01,65.115 0,827.851
17,007,018 12AJ6ole
a\ tool lrw n 110,042188 101'162,067
9i 1sa
TOW c"h EXpo" (WIN 00
o.24uiJ_ x.2u,3o1
45
!u^ifstrfki
Q
STATEMENT OP CASH FLOWS
FISCAL YEAR 9997 (unaudited)
Ekelrl0 water
Cash 80we hdm Dp:aBnq ActlVitlp;
Cash iocdvod from midatem 5703161900 $21,087,255
Cash NU to woollies lot somm (69,013,168) (2,106,806)
Cash axis fo suppa'os (61167,616) (4,296615)
1401 lash proWed by (used tor) operellona 6.64,496 14,681,601
Cosh hews hem hcaosplkl Bnenc)a0 so1W81ea
OperaSnp he15e003 W 10 othel WAS (3,691,914) (22,165)
Pdndpol pall on ACverke from Elumso 0
OpNatlng frensfals in r,dn othel finds 1,050,000 0
ConlnbuoPn9 to Past fllpka0mehl Fund 0 0
ConlrWA" 10 ahem (211,394) 0
Proceeds born od»I 38,665 58.207
44 ash (usedlor) "Icapnal rumndng sct1i6e/ (2,616,843) 68,142
Cash flows hom caplkl and iNSkd Bn4ikhM ac8vhlaal
Ploceods rotefved from cemnbi atru 11,000 307,815
Pmsdj e} pald on revenerm binds (1,950.tAp (21620,431)
Inknal Ord reseal dsM00s (I, 101,009) (3.2011630)
peotaeds from oak or re9emu00 lands 0 0
Prooftim barn I66Wmg d odes payola 0 0 I
Proceed! 110M isdie" Ilan 410rb 0 0
Principal payriml Cn notes payable 0 0
PAndpal payment 06 edvaiua I06m ekdmm 0 O
payment received an A&anoe to o"t Binds 0 0
Acaryman and dimol Wri of fixed a65ela (5,105,748) (2,065.697)
PrhdPel Pa)maMl under CaP'461108n otAgibOn 0 0
Paympora 10 rafunAng bend olofow a90n1 0 0
Hat Cash maed lm) taptal 10161ed edolo! 18,14:1,55/) (T,/80,P32} f
cash from
Issuance Ad.ance to solid wame 0 0 i
Protoeaa Ircm Sole of mvoslmom sommies 69,353,778 10,209,956 I
Purchase ormysmmoM sacumiilis (66244,5131 115,5)6,999)
Wiliest lealved On Invesmianle 3,632,43 1,169,404
Hel cash prounkd by (usalforj invol" 4,841,718 (4,11S,629)
ad'mVil
Het Idtfosle (daci In cash and (0857,963) 53'0c'8' 23 j
cash equlvolento f
Cash Sea rash equha!M s . IO'JIM 1,330,591 16061
Cash end wsh e4*44nk 9!30,97 1476,000 03,100,028
PetoWauOn of 1.11MY ayitsm Operbbrig rudda ln6wie 10
Not CaSn PrD Mod by (used fei C"Sw0 AcWtall {
0"w"2 Inaeme
Adluslmmis. 6,565.514 6,004,255
Depletnatim Elpvnse 3.281,309 2,266021
Oain (Loss) In (ilml assek 0 (9.387)
Cloa,re f P91mmurs 040680 0 0
Comm (nmeaae) In reroNabies 41934,169) (249,516)
Dcuease firx;reaso) an dio Irmo elnol funds p666Mf 6MOO
Oocroas4 (mroas) In ImeMwins 219.071 0
rs ''f CouvAso 11MIeam) a prep o items 0 11178
Increase (Doudsw) In "Cowls payable 3,Y09,990 07,605 '
y Intlowe tDCUeal9) m lease payable 0 0
V Inmeaa0 (0600W) 0 BCCU"nulelad Unpaid
compensaled absences 12,102 2,993
16drel69 Irrut(ease) kh due 10 other funds (D.233,MS) (28,246)
Total Adustmenls 3,121 0UL _ 11,683,1540
1461 Cash P(Nded by Ofwitfmg AcWtol 5,464,496 514,687,601
i
r
~1
Z'01 '4
MOM
U
I
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FISCAL YEAR 101 (unaudfind)
w.lr,ww 4eNd w.ae
can nowt from Opentln9 acwhi"t
Cmh lotsfr6d (10M cultMlere $12,130,126 $7,004.f.41
Cmh Od to kployem la e4nkca (2,419.2021 (2d00.b73)
Cub Peed to uv,"cs 1211100,073) (2.1e6,6eq
NN ash pfD~ by (used IN) 004I1t10ns 7,170,429 2,25:,340
Cmh Novas Nom W460BatAMM1r4 WOVWM:
OPerNNy IrMS1019 as 10 *MI WA (2",146) (61,000)
(I,000.d00) (40.000)
09411" nanHers in hom obw Nnda 0 0
^4016%Aorle to f" nopllant4nl Fred Im•039f {4,000)
t; A Iorr4 to O"ws 1e,92a 0...
Proaedl Nom dMl 0 (02,375
feet all (ulodfor) nonoaPNN WAMr0 6*4" (1,213,250) (16,1170)
CNh NOws Iwn eWW MW tehMd %mmi ly kdrtOMi
Proceeda e"old frdn cwuwod CWW dfAtl 0
PA1dp01 paid m rivw* ba of 19011,ri2) 1521,W2)
Inivem am 10"1 dfarJo! (1,014,550) {046,778)
Proceeds Iron 564 of revMde bonds 0 0
pfoceed9 Ifbr Iaswy 01 Was payable 0 0
Proae0 1704, aManC4 Iron 416000 0 C
Pr'ndpd PaveloAl on notes wable 0 102,458)
Pd"I p4yMMl M idvemV flan 9IMM 0 J
Payment Ie24Nid on adrana ro. rV*t fulls 0 0 e
Ac"sieM and eonslnrction of rood amels (2,173,427) 1410.1184)
PwPal psymem urklef tepllal Im" 01,46titrl 0 130.095)
payrnatflo to r6bysmf fiord mtro,v og"I 0 0
Plot cash 1usWla) taptal relaled W*WS (4,015,944) (1,819,016)
cot'( flows Pon,'nvNOnq klrvhlN:
Ism" aevMa io. sW Aane 0 0
P(aeods fran safe of MvosonoM Wbl%*$ Td 89,638 9,400224
Purdulso d Irwe0m91q eewlilds !0.3!7.8011 10211,030)
Inlefost towyod on lnv461mmt4 $60.924 441,045
Not cast. lfwded by (Qmd fo0 m+eslYlP 1027.2011 MW 969)
Not r4N74se (decleno) In t1sN Ind 3t,t113,d26 1$1,761,276)
than gvIvalinis
Ca A all cash oq*AJOls • 101) 1RP 222.E70 2,745.204
clsh and cash equlvalenls • 013097 $1,406,990 $941.010
NMMOaaUM of WAY syslen, Oporalin9 Funds Inoorns to
fret Cmh PrW40 by (umd for) bptrafin0 AcWVoA
JpafsVN lfK lr (050,189 MAIN
A Suemooc
Lprodaeon £lpomo 1,495,631 team
Oat {Las) In 1110 assale (1,301) 0
Clnsu 41 Posldaure orpens0 0 116,764
Cecr4anl (Increase) In lowA es (99,343) (24,420)
00cromo rmlea") In due horn Omf tuna 2,302,179 26.432
flouWa OL'resta) 61 hvenlorles 0 0
(Nt49sle OrmoasO In prepaid dcros 800 0 ,
lodrosts {COdeas4) it, xcpllae payable 111,301 64,323
Inciesso (Cacrema) h I4m. payable 0 0 '
lntromo pavoise) In rimonwid w3 upped
oempeialed absOn"t 15.635 11911
Increase (Docrasm) to duo 10 ovror lund7 223,140 62,965
trial Agabbenle _ 4,Q60.651 415,079
Not Cash PI&MW by Cpetalm0 AMA1169 57,110,023
i
W~o
41
,.fig - - ~{jy~ I'~,.er d"~iFva ,~i t v; _ o• t
O
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FISCAL YEAR 1997 (unaudited)
T04141 VW Eroded
Cah flows from operating sollw "t bepMMbM 30, 1197 "resew 30, 1110
Cash Iecelved from CUSlolnere $110,847,824 394,088,130
Cash paid to erVoynes fa seMces (07,082,399) (65,93,811
0uh paid 10 svpplers . (14249,922) (151)144039)
Nei Cash pt&MM by (used rot) o"osVons 29,515.503 23,814,088
CHfi flows from n"CSpNal tinanc lno 001hoilINf
ODar IN Iranslefs p1A to 01ha7 104$ (3,908280) 1710,814)
OP04409 9a nfers In from other funds 11060,000 0
ConbACOm9 to floe[ lieyaoemeni Fond _ (01,704) (101,071)
Co tt?UNOAA to amass (10'2.485) . (0,249)
Pimods loom olhof .221,037 09,940
Nel each lusedfer) noneWA, 6mondng wiertes (2,909.421) (012,9941
Cello flows from Capital and termed 11PlnCing uhv0lau
p(t(eld9 fecohed ripe contrimhod capAa) 406,486 281.1 G3
Pmripal paid On tal'Cnm bonds (5,009,832) (4,SS2,780)
IP1414SL and 14041 Charges 15,927,983) {6,060,021 '
Proealoas [turn 34'9 of rovemo bends 0 44,2W,000
Piocoods hart Wong C4 ndea payahte 0 282,360
Proc4eds to= "an(o roan eledde 0 0
pnnnpM payment on notes Payatlo (32,450) 133,005,0921
Pdndpal payment Cn e&ance mom eledr{C 0 ti'morn)
Payment rreNOd on. advance to (AlMr funds 0 1.05,000
Acglh,lon and ConilfwlJon at 64ed assess 19.76,120) 10,002.1411
Prinocal payments under tep4el lease oblgation (38,095) 1102.161
Pay2enls la roles Antj bond osaow agent 0 0
N61 cash (usedfot) eaplal tolalod edWas (21,258,600) (11,470 237)
Cash Iows loom 111"suno 0011016c
lioWt6 acNanC9 (a solid waste 0 0
Proceeds loan ehla of InvosimeM eeWreies 60,133.491 84,139.446
Purchase of ovesimenl sacumfei (80,349,221) (101,030!14)
Worlosi lotehved on 01v6almonle 5,6&5,043 6.369,970
NQ cash p16."46d by (utedra) 9was" !2,530.681 12.421839)
anM6os
Net InerHla (dacwif) In Cash add 52,7260795 [$837,702)
Cash equ)valenla
Carh and Cash agAvs'ahlg • IMIN3 4309.169 5,146,961
Cash AM Cash ealoMe. • 973014 $1,038,034 54,309,250
Nico061400n Of NI0y eyslem Cpefating Funds lu me to
Not Cash PlWdOd by (used la) Oper006g ACSvtles
Operefelg Incme 18,16,839 18,470,&59
AvfuslmeM91
bepischow F.vpmo 1,187,167 ,817,656
Oafn O.oI3) In 14ed assels
CMiurel POSIdNw! (apene0 IIB,Y6, 254,302
DaIdsi r (Increas4) In feuivabfa) {2,301,617) 616,745
OeUaase (Incroli") In due from other OW1 4,712,134 (7,520,621
004roaso (moreass) N Invanledes 210,071 341,141
Oocriese (IW40111 In propakJ Gems 1,890 1,8301
bttloav t0screase) M A(e(aalls payable 3,981,118 (391,061)
IM 4150 (179A16AIa) In old AgAAd '
e 6
Inbelle (04Ue49e) In A(,CVr 1VV6d 4npaw 0 r
COmpeMai6d abs"S 32,831 62,711
IntraA14 (Cecreaas) M du) to Omar funds (7,173,855) 8453,054
trial A464t4hie 117045,652 .84101
Nol Cash Plavided by Operating 40mu99 ~ Sn,527,191 827~8BB,76~~9
48
'rrl Ji E f ~ i ~p~x7 t
t 1tii n .rc j .3 7 'R
• 32X
K.
MANAGEMENT
February 1, 1998
DENTON._CI7Y COUNCIL
JACK MILLER, MAYOR
EULINE BROCK, MAYOR FRO•TEM
RONI BEASLEY, COUNCIL MEMBER
MIRE COCHRAN, COUNCIL MEMBER
NEIL DURRANC8, COUNCIL MEMBER
SANDY KRISTOFFRSON, COUNCIL MEMBER
CAKL YOUNG, COUNCIL MEMBER
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
GEORGE HOPKINS, CHAIRMAN
BILL CASE, VICE-CHAIRMAN
DICK NORTON, SECRETARY
BOBCOFLEN
CIEARLDEAN NEWELL
0EFlQJy M mEl98B
TED $ENAVIDLS, CITY MANAGER
HOWARD MARTIN, ASSISTANT CI'T'Y MANAGER OF UTILITIES
UT LIT" pB9C7OB-
SHARON MAYS; DIRWTOR OF ELECTRIC UTILITIES
(VACANT), DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATIONS
JILL JORI)AN, INTERIM DIRECTOR OF WATEII,/WASTEWATER
ENGINEERING AND FIELD SERVICES
1
i