The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-14-1998 ^ i.,. i , ~r7 ,n + Y I i + ~ I I~~1 14 + rfl~'A !.r r - J,_ r r,Y y ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ti E. si '~'G^~ J 5 ~ ~ S 4 9 r ! i^1Ir~A " 'f 1' ! y S+~ DIY ~ `1; al t 7 "5" i ~ i i• 1~ ~ ~ ~ + 1 ~ S f trff v ~ h I d 13M1 ~o . + f ~ t °r ^~t P ~ ti5 r I t i' ~ I J { a t~ 10 Q lv~ h! r+ P ~ i I ~ ~ d I+~ 3 r ,r i'I i! X~~ Y+I~+ t,`~It "S •,r~ ^ ~,lf g~+7 'S." 'el y f r + 7 1^ + ~ 1 ~ t 1, !r ' ~j '~t t v ~ c III v: ~ ~ ~'7 ~ ~ ' I u i 1 I ,fit I 1 ~ ~ ! v f " " S J ~ i 3 x i pf Fl 1 •f i City Council Agenda Packet April 14 1998 K p Y k4 I1. 41 of t f I F .r: ; 1 , O ~,qf,)da No AGENDA Apenda Item CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL Date---~ia April 14, 1998 Afler determining that a quorum is present and convening in an open meeting, the City Council wili convene in a closed meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, April 14, 1998 e, at 5:15 p,m. in the Council Work Session Room at City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: I. Closed Mecting: A, Conference with Employees -Linder TEX. GOVT. CODE SL% 551.075. The y, Council may receive information from employees during a staff conferei:ce or briefing, c but may not deliberate during the conference.' ANY FINAL ACTION, DECISION, OR VOTE ON A MATTER DELIBERATED IN A CLOSED MEETD'G OR ON INFORMATION RECEIVED IN A CONFERENCE WITH EMPLOYEES WILL ONLY BE TAKEN IN AN OPEN MEETING THAT IS HELD IN COMPLIANCE WITH TEX. GOV'T. CODE CIL 551. THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO A CLOSED MEETING OR EXECUTIVE SESSION AS AUTHORIZED BY I EX, GOV'T. CODE SEC. 551.001, ET SEQ. (TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT) ON ANY FT EM ON ITS OPEN MEETING AGENDA OR TO RECONVENE IN A CONTINUATION OF THE CLOSED MEETIN'O ON THE CLOSED MEETING ITEMS NOTED ABOVE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEIE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, t INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION SECTIONS 551.071.551.085 OF THE OPEN MEEIINGS ACT. Special Called 1vlecting of the Cily of Denton City Council on Tuesday, April 14. 1998 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Work Session Room at City Ifell, 215 E, McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the folio" ing ilea, will be considered: I. Consider adoptio^. of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a change order to the Intake Structure Dredging Project, Bid No. 1936; authorizing final payment to the contractor and the release of claims of all parties; and providing an effective date. 2. Consider a motion to authorize the holding of a City Council meeting outside of City Hall. WcA Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, April 14, 1998 at 6:15 p.m, in the Council Work Session Room at City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will K, considered, NOTE.: A Work Session is used to explore matters of interest to one or more City Council Members or the City Manager for the purpose of giving staff direction into tahcther or not such ' matters should be placed on a future regular or special meeting of the Council for citizen input, r City Council deliberation and formal City action, At a Worl Session, the City Council generally teceives informal and preliminary, reports and information from City staff, officials, members of City committees, and the individual or organization proposing council action. if invited by City Council or City Manager to participate in the session. Participation by individuals and members of organizations invited to speak ceases when the Mayor announces the session is being closed to 25 ❑ 32x , t `ir ei ~-13 SONY~ City of Denton City Council Agenda April l4, 1998 Page t public input. Although Work Sessions are public meetings, and citizens have a legal right to attend, they are not public hearings, so citizens are not allowed to participate in the session unless invited to do so by the Mayor. Any citizen may supply to the City Council, prior to the beginning of the session, a written report regarding the citizen's opinion on the matter being explored. Should the Council direct the matter be placed on a regular meeting agenda, the staff will generally prepare a final report defining the proposed action, which will be made available to all citizens prior to the regular meeting at which citizen input is sougat. The purpose of this procedure is to allow citizens attending the regular meeting the opportut,ty to hear the views of their fellow citizens without having to attend two meetings. 1 • Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding a request from the Historic Landmark Commission for funding for an archival study and archeological survey of the Pickneyville site. 2. Receive a report and provide direction to staff regarding the location and use of the Governor's Community Achievement Award landscaping award. 3. Receive a funding recommendations report from the Community Develop,nent Advisory Committee (CDAC) and the Human Services Committee (11SC) and hold a discussion regarding the proposed 1998 City of Denton Action Plan for Housing and Community N%clopment. (James McDatle, CDAC Chair, and Fran Moore, HI Chair, are cheduled to pro ride brief ngs.J 4, Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding the exten:=ion of the 1998 deadline for obtaining a tax exemption for designated historic sites, 5. llold a discussion regarding an ordinance creating an abatement of [axes assessed by the City of Denton. Texas for appropriate repairs and renovation of historic buildings in the downtown commercial district of the City of Denton. 6. Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give direction to staff with regard to the proposed annexation of two tracts of land and a request to release land from the City of Denton l;xtra-Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). A. Oakmont 11. Approximately 1.6 acres annexation and 2.1 acres disannexation near State School Road and Robinson Road. The areas are part of a single-family residential subdivision. i B. The Preserve at Pecan Creek. Approximately 13 acres near Edwards Road. This proper( will provide secondary access to a proposed mixed-use, mixed-housing - r commt.nity. Townhome development is proposed in this particular area, C. Release of 1:TJ. An area near Bartonvilie, south of FM 407. A siagledamily subdivision is proposed. Do applicants have expr^ssed a desire to connect to Barton ille utilities. fi r 2.'. 10 32XIC1 11111111111111110 I IY Y< 1 t ! f ,'f, r u y ~b r ~ r .I R fC 4 , 'y < r y+~ P. Y' i ` 1 - F R~' r+fr b, ) r l 1 ! 1 , .t f 1 1 1w. 1 I'' t o S J t l 1 7 r ~9 t ; 1" f f, r f f Y 1 f n f r tt. I~ s f• o,, ar, ~r~f~, , F ,r t f f f `.1 r ~ s • f 4` r 1 O, I ~ F r r ! r fCV. I ~ f o'. I r h t I f t 1 t 1 I I1 pt f ~I' W r 1 1 SY.` 1 r .ROl141 p^ City of Denton City Council Agenda April 14, 1998 Page 3 7r Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the 1998.1999 Solid Waste holiday disposal schedule. t 8. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding growth forecasts. CERTIFICATE 1 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 1998 at o'clock , . 3 (a.m) (p.m.) CITY SECRETARY NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION ROOM 1S ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES AST. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 349.8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1.800-RELAY•TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE 1 SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. t f i x.10 ` 32X 10 0 ddddwffi~~ .gyp Y y Y , Ag6nds Nv..._gL - s Agenda Item " Date` I ORDINANCE NO. r AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CHANGE OR- DER TO THE INTAKE STRUCTURE DREDGING PROJECT, BID NO. 1936; AUTHORJZ- ING FINAL PAYMENT TO THE CONTRACTOR AND THE RELEASE OF CLAIMS OF ALL PARTIES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, there has been a dispute between the Contractor, Hydro Pump & Equip mcnt, Inc,, and the City regarding the final completion of the Intake Structure Dredging Projocl, Bid No. 1936, to uncover a lower intake valve at Lewisville Lake; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to settle the matter by the execution of a final de- ductive Change Order, which would reduce the Contract amount by $33,770.00 and provide for a final payment of 520,000.00 to the Contractor; and WHEREAS, the Contractor and Surely have executed the Change Order, releasing all claims against the City, and the Contractor has executed an Affidavit and Final Release, affirm- ing that all final bills have been paid; and WHEREAS, the City deems it in the public interest to authorize the City Manager to exe- cute the attached Change Order to Intake Structure Dredging Project, NOW, THEREFORE, i THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDA•NS: SECTION I. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Change Order to Intake Structure Dredging Project on Bid No. 1936 with the Cnntractor, Hydro Pump & Equip- ment, Inc., and the Surety, Amwest Surety Insurance Company, Bid No. 1936, in substantially the form of the attached Change Order, which is made a part of this ordinance as if written word for word herein. 1 SECTION _It, That the City Manager is hereby authorized to make the final payment to x the Contractor in the amount set forth in the Change Order, SlCTION IIL That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval PASSFJI ANr APPROVFD this the ___day 1998. i y JACK MILLER, MAYOR 1 32x0 11 ~.Y ~nl Y 1. . , Y l 1 1 1 r. r Y 1 ~4 f r. , r 0 s~ r r r~ 11; f t rwweuv 1 , •1 i ' ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY. r, '",0dbp LOLIClm I~nPm~.n.n'91 l,0~ol+'9 Jnp wen 64 1 + j I 1 r< J r ~ N ~ 1 f 2 r 25 x ❑ 32 xl❑ Rarer 0 "WIMM Y _ I I i i CHANGE. ORDER TO INTAKE STRUCTURE DREDGING PROJECT CHANGE ORDER NO.: One OWNER: City of Denton, Texas CONTRACTOR: Hydro Pump & Equipment, Inc SURETY: Amwesl Surety Insurance Company BID NO.: 1936 CONTRACT DATE: September 17, 1996 WHEREAS, Owner and Contractor executed an Agreement dated Scptember 17, 1996, relating to Bid No. 1936 in the amount of $80,495.00, which secured performance by Surety's Bond No. 1287270; and WHEREAS, the Agreement provided that Contractor was to dredge 2,000 cubic yards of material from water intake structure and channel and deposit in lake disposal area; and WHEREAS, a dispute has arisen relating to whether or not the terms of the Agreement have been met, and Owner, Contractor, and Surety desire to settle the dispute subject to the pro- visions set forth herein; NOW, THEREFORE, OWNER, CONTRACTOR, AND SURETY (Parties) agree as foiloAs: 1. The Parties agree to make the following chan_tes in this Contract: Liquidated Damages Credit: S33,770 Total Amount of this Change Order Credit: S33,770 The Original Contract Sum was SS0.495 Net Change by Previously Authorized Change Orders 0 The Contract Sum Prior to this Change Order was 80,495 The Contract Sum Decreased by this Change Order (33,770) The New Contract Sum Including this Change Order will be 46,725 Amount of Previous Payments Slade to Contractor under Contract (26,725) Final Payment Due Contractor Under this Change Order $20,000 2. Upon the execution of this Change Order by the duly authorized represcu(aGves of the Par. tics, Owner agrees to remit a check to the Contractor, Hydro Pump & Equipment, Inc., in the amount of $20,000.110, in full satisfaction of Owner's responsibilities under the Agreement. By its signature hereon, the Surety fully consents to this payment to Contractor. 3, that the approximately 1336 cubic yards of material which has been removed from the lake 0 , is found to be satisfactory completion of the intake structure dredging protect, and Owner waives any claims it may have to additional liquidated damages. u 4. 1'hat the warranty and guaranty provisions of the N'C1'C'OG Standard Specifications for Pub- tic Works Construction, which Acre incorporated into Bid No. 1936, were honored by Con- 3 25 AD 32XI❑ ~ ~ n6 VOW" 4 Q 1i ! t ' S ICI tractor and Surety for a period of one year from December 10, 1996, which is the agreed upon date of final completion. 5. Contractor and Surety release any and all claims, liens, rights, judgments, demands, or inter- ests they may have now or in the future against Owner for breach of contract or any other le- gal or equitable remedy, including, but not limited to, failure to receive adequate compensa- tion for work performed and all mechanic's and materialman's liens under the Constitution and laws of the state of Texas growing out of Intake Structure Dredging Project Bid No. 1936 and this Contract. Owner releases Contractor and Surety from and against any and all claims, demands, judgments, or causes of actions that it may have now or in the future in connection with the Intake Structure Dredging Project Bid No. 1936, Performance Bond No. 1287270, 6. All services performed under this Agreement are warranted to be in accordance with the J contract documents, including, without limitation, the plans and specifications. Contractor and Surety guarantee, in accordance with their respective obligations, that this work will be { free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one year from the job com- pletion date of December 10, 1996. 7. 'that, prior to Owner's remitting of $20,000.00 to Contractor, Contractor shall provide an af- fidavit that payrolls, bills for materials and equipment, and other indebtedness connected with the wo;k hava been paid or otherwise satisfied. i 8, This Change Orde • shall extend to and bind the Parties and their successors and assigns. 9. To the extent that this Change Order conflicts with tenns and provisions of the Agreement between Contractor and Owner, She terms and provisions of this Change Order prevail 10. ]'he unenforceability of any provision of this Change Order shall not affect the validity or cnforccability of any other provision hereof. 11. This Change Order is not valid until signed by all the Parties. , By execution hereof, the parties represent that the perso executing this Change Order arc fully authorized to bind the respective parties to all the terms and conditions of this Change Order. C'111' OF DENTON (Ow tier) Approved as to Form: 1 • By' - - By' _ - • Ted Bcnavides, City Manager Herbert L. Prouty, City Attorney Date signed by Owner _ i I 4 % LP 25x ICa 32xId ~ • _ ~ 1 1 ~ J I 1 f 1 7 I ~ i I' , e v f. • 1 a,A'~i z a • , i w I 1 ♦ A d I t ~ l a ~ ~ pie { i 1" Gnu, r\' I ~ 1 m~o~se i , HYDRO PUMP & EQUIPMENT, INC. (Contractor) Cerporate Secretary/Witness By' By: Louis Yelich, President Dale signed by Contractor _ AMWEST SURETY INSURANCE CO. (Surety) Corporate Secretarv/WiInes s By: By _ Date signed by Surely r° 'J ~ '01 1 nvvrn.rsu~etnt~rrr~.corn,n<mneo`CmnKUMbboRilTo,~y,o.4r6. { r + + J 'I j i 1 i 5 r w, v ~ 1 T A ti r ~ i L 1' I t1 r L { e~ p. 1 < . n . i. s J y f { , J.• :,a. .y .Yaa.JOr!uf.n vlmAt.Y1K+..~'i. MLaRt`CYiMIY4CN ~ nn-ry ~ r Agenda No. ~ Agenda Item Data l AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET I ~ AGENDA DATE; April 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office CAI: Ted Benav ides, City Manager S BJECT Consider a molios to authorize the holding of a City Council meeting outside of City Hall. f BACKGROUND On August 5, 1997 the Council adopted Ordinance No. 97.220 which allows the holding of Council meetings outside of City Nall under certain circumstances. This was in accordance with section 2.05 of the City Charier and section 4• l of the Rules and Procedure of the City Council. The ordinance indicates that the Council may hold meetings in places away from City Hall so long as the Mayor announces the location of that meeting at the City Council meeting immediately preceeding the meeting to be changed, and a motion or simple resolution is approved by at least four members of the Council. On Friday, April 17 1h the Council will be holding a joint session with the Demon Independent School District at the Radisson Hole] in Denton. Approval of this motion will allow compliance with Ordinance No. 97.220. attached Ordinance No. 97220, section 2.05 of the Charter and section 4.1 of the Rules and Procedure are for your information. Respectflilly s bmitted; 1 nnife Walters ty Secretary i V I 1 _ , 1(0 10 0 I II` M1 I I I fLLti1MD~~wIIMS17.4ly i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING T14E CITY COUNCIL, UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES SET FORTH HEREIN, TO HOLD MEETINGS OUTSIDE OF CITY HALL; VALIDATING PREVIOUS MEETINGS AND ACTIONS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Hail or the Denton Municipal Building is in the process of being renovated and is not available for City Council meetings during the period of renovation due to lack of appropriate space to accommodate all members of the public, lack of proper access to persons with disabilities and due to potential dangers and inconvenience to the members of the general public during construction; and WHEREAS, the City Council from time to time may need to hold meetings away from City flail to serve the public interest; NOW, THEREFORE, i BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SKT3Q~LI The City Council, for the period from July 1, 1997 until the Council Chambers in the City 110 at 215 East McKinney Street, are completely renovated and ready for public use shall hold all its meetings in the Police Department Conference Room, the Central Jury Room and other areas of the Denton Municipal Complex at 601 East Hickory Street, Denton, Texas, unless it directs the meetings be held in another location by ordinance or resolution. SEC1ION I I, That the City Council shall hold meetings on the budget beginning at 4.00 ant on August 8 and August 15, 1997 in the Golden Eagle Suite in the University of North Texas Union Building at Prairie at Avenue A, Denton, Texas SfLCl-IQN lit. In accordance with section 2,05 of the City Charter and section 4.1 of the Rules and Procedure of the city Council, the City Council may from time to time hold joint 0 meetings with the Denton Independent School District, workshop meetings, retreat and budget meetings and regular and special meetings in places away from City hall that are readily accessible to all members of the public so long as the Mayor announces the location of that meeting at the meeting of the City Council immediately proceeding the meeting and, a motion or simple resolution is approved by at least four members of the Council, approving the meeting site All such meetings shall be held in accordance with Chapter 55 i of the Government Code 0 S_E~fION IV All previous meetings and all actions taken at those meetings held at a C 0 location other than the City Hall at 215 East McKinney Street, including, without limitation, any SwF' joint meetings with the Denton Indepc:,::nt School District and the Denton Planning Commission , any workshops or retreats, are hei r,y affirmed, ratified and approved 2 Y t \ q A ..t ~ r R t l w 1 14 A ~ 1 \ A ~.1 I ~r~' Ay ~ / rJ ~ A t ~4 f\ Y, 1 Y a tirv ~'i v! ,~1 ~I R `I ~ v F.1 v 11 1 ~ \ , ~ 1 r 1 V '~Y Y ~ Y. Y ! 4 III w I ly r SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval 1997, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 7 ~Y JAC ILLER, MAYOR r ATTEST: i JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY BY: J 3 t. w 7 17 i f . 0 r' 1 • anaise~ CHARTER 1 2.06 law, but shell not Interfere with the managerial duties and responsibilities of the city man- ager. The mayor shall have all the same powers and privileges as any other councilmember, including entitlement to vote upon a matters considered by the council, but shall have no veto power. The council shall, as soon as possible after the annual election, elect from its membership a mayor pro tem. The mayor pro tem shall act as mayor during the absence or disability of the mayor and if a vacancy occurs shall become mayor for the completion of the unexpired term. (Ord, No. 79.86, 12, 12.11.79, ratified 1.19.80) Sec. 2.04. Vacancies In council, Where a vacancy in any place on the council shall occur, the vacant place shall be filled by a special election, and, where necessary, by a runoff election, In the same manner as provided In this charter for the regular election of the rouncilperson. Such special election shall be held on a Saturday within sixty (60) days fol:owing the creation of the vacancy, and the run,,fr election, where necessary, shall be held on the fourteenth day alter the preceding election: provided, however, that where a vacancy shall occur within one hundred and twenty (120) days of a regular election, no special election to rill the vacancy shall be called, unless more than one vacancy occurs. (Ord. No. 76.12, Amend. No. 2, 4.6.76) See.. 2.06. Meetings of the council. 1a) On the second (2nd) Tuesday in April, or as soon thereafter as practicable, the council shall meet at the city hall and the newly-elected members shall qualify, and assume the duties of office. Thereafter, the council shall meet regularly at such times as may be prescribed by its rules but not less frequently than once each calendar month. All meetings of the council shall be held at the city hall unless the council shall by ordinance or resolution designate another place. b) Special meetings shall be called by the city secretary upon request of the mayor, city manager, or a majority or the members of the council. (c) The city manager shall attend all meetings of the council and may take part in the ^ discussion of all matters coming before the council but shall have no vote. (Ord. No. 7986, 12, 12.11.79, ratified 1.1980) Sec ?,08, Quorum, voting. w A majority of the members of the council shall constitute a quorum in- the transaction of business, and the affirmative vote of a majority of the council Shall be neaseery to repeal any ordinance or take any official action In the name of the city, except as otherwise provided in this Charter or by the general laws of the State of Texas. 0 Ib) The ayes and noes shall be taken upon the passage of all ordinances or resolutions and the vote or each member shall be recorded in the minutes. (Ord. No. 7612, Amend. No. 3, 4.6.76; Ord, No. 7988, 12, 1211.79, ratified 1.19.80) 4 i i - ~r~ 32XIO n.. 4, 1 1 1 (e) No staff member, other than a staff member having the floor, shall enter into any discussion either directly or indirect- ly without permission of the presiding officer. 3.3 Citizens: of the Council, and will w be admitted to the Council chamber eupnto the fire safety capacity of the room. (b) All citizens will refrain from private conversations in the Chamber while the council is in session, (c) Citizens attending Council meetings shall observe the same rules of propriety, decorum, and good conduct applicable to the administrative staff. Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks or who becomes boisterous while addressing the Council or while attending the council meeting shall be removed from the room if the Sergeant-at-Arms is so directed by the presi- ding officer, and such person shall be barred from further audience before the council during that session of the council. (d) Unauthorized remarks from the audience, stamping of feet, applauding, whistles, yells, and similar demonstrations shall not be permitted by the presiding officer, who shall direct the Sergeant-at-Arms to remove such offenders from the room. In case the presiding officer shall fail to act, any member of the council may move to require him or her to act to enforce the rules, and the affirmative vote of four (4) members of the Council shall require the presiding officer to act. (e) No placards, banners or signs of any kind will be permitted in the Council Chamber except exhibits, displays and visual aids used in connection with presentations to the Council, provided that such exhibits, displays and visual aide do not disrupt the meeting. f 3.4 Enforcementi The city !tanager, in the absence of a designated law enforcement officer, shall act as Sergeant-at-Arms for the Council, and shall furnish whatever assistance is needed to enforce the rules of decorum herein established. 3.5 Seating drrapgementt The City Secretary, City Manager and City Attorney shall occupy the respective state in the Council chamber assignod to them by the Mayor, but any two or more members 0 of the Council may exchange seats. 4. TYPES OF MRITIK91 J 4.1 Regular M4etinas: The council shall meet at seven o'clock p.m. on the first and third Tuesday of each month or at any 5 ' s.'Sr K l_1 32 X' c I . I other times set by the Council, unless postponed or canceled for valid reasons. All regular meetings of the Council will be held in the Municipal Building at 215 East McKinney Street, or such loca- tion as the City council may by motion, resolution or ordinance f designate. ~I L~-- 4.2 ,Special Meetinaai Special meetings may be called by the Mayor, the City Manager, or by any three members of the Council. The call for a special meeting shall be filed with the City Secre- tary in written form, and he or she shall post notice thereof as provided by law, 4.3 Workshoo_Meetingas Workshop meetings or work sessions may be called using the same procedure required for special meet- ings. (See Sec. 4.2) The purpose of the workshop meeting is to discuss or explore matters of interest to the City, to meet with a City Board, Commission, or Committee Members, City staff or officers of civic organizations, governing bodies or individuals I specifically invited to the session by the Mayor, Council or City I Manager. These meetings are informational and normally, no final action shall be taken unless the posted agenda indicates otherwise. Citizens or other interested persons attending the work session will not be allowed to participate in the session unless invited to i do so by the Mayor. Citizens should be advised of the nature of the work session and that their input may be received and consid- ered at a regularly scheduled council meeting where the agenda pro- vides for final action to be taken on the matter. The purpose of this procedure is to allow the citizens attending the regular meeting the opportunity of hearing the views of their fellow citizens in a more formal setting. Any citizen may supply the City council a written statement or report regarding the citizen's opinion on a matter being discussed in a work session. If the mayor invites citizens to participate in a work session, their participation will cease at the point the Mayor closes the session to public input to allow the council to give City staff direction as to needed information for the possible future meeting without distracting comment from the audience. • 4.4 Emergency Meetinass in case of emergency or urgent public necessity, which shall be e..pressed in the notice of the meeting, an emergency meeting may be called by the Mayor, the city manager or by three members of the Council, and it shall be suf- ficient if the notice is posted two hours before the meeting is convened. O 4.5 Closed Meetinges The Council may meet in a closed O 1 meeting pursuant to the requirements of the Texas open Meetings 1.1 Act, chapter 5511 TEX. GOVT CODE ANN. (Vernon 1994), as amended. 6 32 x E u C • ~I i WORM Agenda No, Agenda Item Date { I , AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET i AGENDA DATE: April 14,1998 DEPARTMENT: Economic Development (Main Street) ACM: Kathy DuBose, Assistant City Manager of Finance SUBIECT: RECEIVE A REPORT, HOLD A DISCUSSION, AND GIVE STAFF 1 DIRECTION REGARDING A REQUEST FROM THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION FOR FUNDING FOR AN ARCHIVAL STUDY AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE PICKNEYVILLE SITE BACKGROUND., A group working on preservation of the original site of Pickneyville was awarded 55,000 in Lalor funds to conduct three fundraising projects under the name "Friends of Denton County History." The group is currently in the process of obtaining authorization from the City to ulili2e the funds through the Denton Co;wty Historical Society rather than under the name "Friends of Denton County History." According to Barry Vermillion, these funds are obligated for a pow-wow ment, which is tentatively scheduled for the third week in Scplembcr. In a presentation to the Historic Landmark Commission on March 9, Commissioner Vermillion reported that the owners of the Pi:kncy%ilie land wish to move forward as rapidly as possible with a sale. In order for the group to actively solicit major donations to acquire the • property, an archeological sun-ey veri fying the significance of the site is urtfently needed. An arcluclogist who visited the property recently located shards of early 19` century ceramic ware. There is also evidence of earlier Wachita occupation of the land. Due to the urgency of authenticating the site, the Historic Landmark Commission passed a resolution asking Council to fund the archeological survey. This request is for the City to fund the archeological survey directly; it is not a request for additional funds for Friends of Denton r1 County Ilislory or for the Denton County Historical Society, p Members of the Historic Landmark Commission will present their request for funding at the work session. 1 0 Page 1 LIEW .y J r 5 I I. c •I I 1 I Y I ~ v f ' ~ Y l a f 1 J 11~ t f J. ~ i Y S , 14 Y it 1 ~~~r L7~ f ~•t l t Y , J I f 1 ~ v/ I r' v n .+G « S . O I F I ( 1 v + v 1 I PRIOR ACTIONIEVIEW : At the March 9 meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission, a res. +tion requesting Council to consider funding this project passed by a vote of 6-0. FISCAL INFORMATION: The resolution by Historic Landmark Commission asks Council , to find an amount not to exceed $7,500. The resolution does not specify the proposed source of funds (e.g. Lalor, general fund, etc.). Preservation of historic resources does qualify as an E eligible expenditure of hotel-motel taxes. I~ E EXHIBITS: Excerpt from drafl minutes of the Historic Landmark Commission x: Respectfully submitted; Linda Ratliff, Director ` Economic Development Department 'ra Prepared by: • /Q Denisha Williams • Main Street Manager • • 2 • Page 2 F, {x o r . I❑ 32X 10 wa Excerpt from minutes of the March 9,1998 Historic Landmark Commission meeting IV. Receive a report regarding Pickneyviile site from Commissioner Barry Vermillion and make recommendations pertaining to the report i Commissioner Vermillion recapped the Pickneyville project. Pickneyville was the site of the first I county seat in Denton. The site has been located and the property is currently for sale. As a member of the Denton County Historical Commission, Commissioner Vermillion invited Dan Potter, an archeologist from the Office of State Archeology of the Texas Historical Commission, to visit the site and offer advice, The archeologist visited the site on February 12, 1998 and collected several shards of ceramic ware. He found that one piece suggested an early 19" century date, possibly dating from the founding of the site. The archeologist suggested that an archeological contracting firm be hired to conduct a professional survey of the site to verify if this is the site of Pickneyville. Commissioner Vermillion has made s request for bids for the survey and has received one response. The first bid was for 57,240. Commissioner Vermillion assured the Commission that this survey would produce final evidence of authenticity for both the Wichita site and Pickneyville A funding source is needed for the archeological survey. Commissioner Vermillion intends to ask both the City of Denton and Denton County to assist in ' purchasing the site and making it a historical site. The site to be purchased will probably be 14- 15 acres. He also stated that there may be burial sites associated with the Wichita land. Commissioner Vermillion added that local archeologists were unavailable for the survey project. Chairman Lowry asked for a resolution to request funds from City Council to finance the archeological survey. A motion was made by Commissioner Vermillion for the RFSOLCITIOX: The historic landmark Commission requests that the Denton City Council consider 0 funding an archival study and archeological survey of Pickneyville, Denton County, Texas, and associated Wichita site for an amount not to exceed 57,500. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Montgomery and passed by a vote of 6-0. Commission Chair Lowry will ask to be included on the next City Council agenda to present the resotution on behalf of the Historic Landmark Commission. to 3 0 32X I O r a r AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET Agenda No Agenda Iteml oZ AGENDA DATE: April 14, 1998 Oats DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development DCM: Rick Svehla1 SUBJECT Receive a report and provide direction to staff regarding the location and use of the Governor's Community Achievement Award landscaping award BACKGROUND As part of the Governor's Community Achievement Award from the Texas Department of Transportation and Keep Texas Beautiful, Denton received $60,000 for a landscape project on state right-of-way. The Keep Denton Beautiful Board presented several suggestions to the City Council at their August 26, 1997 work session. At the October 14, 1997 Keep Denton Beautiful meeting, the Board of Directors recommended Fort Worth Drive as the site for the landscaping award. Letters from the Texas Department of Transportation indicating that Fort Worth Drive has been designed to include landscaping and that landscaping may be installed at the end of the widen project are attached. TXDOT will be responsible for preparing a plan for approval by Denton. i The Board requested written documentation from the Texas Department of Transportation about tite possibility of landscaping 1-35E at the Ave D exit. This information was provided in Decemher 1997. A copy of the letter from TXDOT Landscape Ar hitect Tony Lucido is attached. A chart oil the required clear zones is also Included in the attachments. UTIMATFD SCI EDULE OF PROJECT TXDOT began widening Fort Worth Drive in February 1999. Landscaping would be installed at the end of the widening project. Completion of the project is currently scheduled for Starch 1999. Based on the Dallas Driv- and University Drive projects, the landscaping contracts should be completed by the end of constntction to March 1999. Landscape Installation could begin immediately upon completion of the road project in tht fpring of 1999. PRIOR A-MON/REVIEW She City Council reviewed several suggestions at their August 26, 1997 work session. Sites and projects discussed included Fort Worth Drive landscaping, the 1.35W entrance marker landscaping, redbud tree plantings along the interstate system, and wildflower plantings along rights-of-ways. FISCAL IYFORNIAT10N According to TXDOT estimates, the landscaping will cost approximately S61.000. The Governor's Community Achievement award provides $60,000. TXDOT will provide specific costs with the design Q I for the landscaping. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: Prepared by: ~~.LLttY its.. David Hill / Director, Planning and Development Cecile Carson Small Area Planning Manager - » 32x10 Vail-'A 4, V F _ ,r, it n o • ~ I ~ ~ ~ c i r i % ' ,f ,err A, ill '!,l/ l~~ , , M • 4 . i * ~ ~ ' 1 {yti ;?s l e a 1 Y J 1 1 1 r , a 1'." ..,~.'i >Fli'..t', JN,Hn 1,.i4h Yu • r~~,. ~ .._u.~. ru .uuu. , a" TABLE OF CONTENTS ~r { 1. RECOMMENDATION t Rt 4 A. Summary of project and analysis of projects discussed at the August 27, 1997 r' City Council meeting B. Location map IL TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -A A. Governor's Community Achievement Award Landscape Project Development Flow Chart B. Claude Eisom, Area Engineer regarding Fort Worth Drive •4 •l i' 1 C. Patrick Haigh, District Landscape Architect regarding Fort Worth Drive D. Tony Lucido, Landscape Architect regarding t-'S E at Ave D E. Clearance Zones 1 l Ill. FORT WORTH DRIVE CONSTRUCTION PLANS IV. LANDSCAPE MEDIAN PHOTOS V. MINUTES ,r• A. City Council meeting of August 26, 1997 B. Keep Denton Beautiful meting of October 14, 1997 { l~ 1 d" J~otx~g~~~ ~C7x~ 176X~~ , y'SrrkYs,1 , Wom a+s,r~a GOVERNOR'S COMMUNITY ACHIEVEMENT AWARD RECOMMENDATION: FORT WORTH DRIVE LANDSCAPING OF 10,431 SQUARE FEET OF AREA " PROJECT COST 561,164 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FSTiMATFS FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION t IRRIGATION $6,259.00 S60 PER HEAD FOR 100 SQUARE FEET OF COVERAGE LANDSCAPE MATERIALS $52,155 .00 GROUND COVER, SHRUBS, SOIL, MULCH AT $5 PER SQUARE FEE T TREES S2,750.00 SUGGESTIONS ON OTHER PROJECT'S DISCUSSED BY CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST 27,1997: 11 f RECOMMEND ALTERING SLOPE OF THE AREA IN FRONT OF DALLAS DRIVE "WELCOME TO DENTON" SIGN • Project will be completed by an Eagle Scout in the Spring 1998 BEGIN PROGRAM TO SELL WILDFLOWERS FOR CHRISTMAS, BIRTHDAYS, ANNIVERSARY AND OTHER HOLIDAYS Program in Dallas provided some funding for a project in cooperation with TXDOT, Keep Denton Beautiful Finance Committee discussed the idea in October. Plan to be considered for 1999 JJ AVE D AND 1.35E AREA TXDOT reviewed the site and provided the attached letter. The letter expresses concerns about landscaping this area. Major constraints addressed include the need for a retaining we wit4 a 30 foot clear zone and the slope of the hill. Although the project may still be possible, the cost would be substantial. The Board has suggested a long-range project involving TXDOT, the University of North Texas and the City of Denton. REDBUD PLANTINGS TXDOT guidelines will permit planting but additional work will be required to identify sites and determine watering options. Trees from the National Tree Trust and other donations are available to continue this project. { 32 X I0 SWAM q , 31 { Governors Community Achievement Award Rs"maWW l.na"s She i i k ~G t~ N W r 1 w. J 4 :MYf:.T C.~A:'vtS~1!Yn9'. f i.~ r n Y" r 1 1" r V w + "~e d-}t°ft1441~'r'ir f a ll 1 + t! l xE 1 1 x. ~'1 4 !z iid g~, r ~ Y .x I ' :4 1 '~~I + 1,, 1'f r1 ~k '~!y b~ rti" f ! 1 ~ ' f a" r.. >i 1 rr. + 1 . r~ i ~fis~a L 1 ur el~. '^I a 4, ! r.., ~ ' 1 F;1 x yr , II i _ e f . a' r ro 1~ tr L t h `f~ t J r' ' r , T . ................w...~.m.w..,w~.~..~..... .......,nY~A4"~5' ~'A~.+....~,... ~1 . _ 1~ I r , 1 + 1 f~ 4 , ,I A It: i r w' 1 1 P 1 I~ I 1 1 r 1 #:f 4 O + _rJ a..l~ 1 TWE LINE MYMYM` YMy MIxY~I Yr~O M11M1 tt,M4,~~ ~,l - . PE ............................................................._.................._..._..__t......................_... _ _ . . +1 r yrc , f _ r WO awWWA w nw wl tannuc+ rw4 w[rna k4wmwm IpAMS 1 h PARnC der a ea va, L'SN" ~-1-_. COY f7 R"In %rn - r Tn F Y.cxs..s N~ ................$y..;;,F... I,;sx... ~a... rrxr_..._.....~v,.,._ AGaOe e!v .s.. xM1 r DWS rw ~Cyu 1 tC L^70~. ' `4 I II Y JLi LANDSCAPE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT FLOW CHART 4N S~ ll, L rr~~ t? r~ ~~y't l' h 7;T x I1J 2X~D 25X~~ xG ,3airi'`k' 14f 4~ai _ r YP'I Y! i<:, ~ r ~ y.'•. G 4 " , ~ i r y 1 ' N ; rr , ~ I b. Y~ 1 I E i 1 , Y~ 1 P, ~ C li 1 111! + i I 7 y ,f i! A 4 1 y 'G_'Qh v YYIa fY, ~ tly~` T,,, l~ I ,tip a~^1 .Yk 1 P~ T Aid 4 Ir . Q ■ r P' ~ I l 1 n a a ~ t P 1 ititl4illi Yi11 YJ`AY~.u~naM N. t.... ...4n.wvwn '.y n.. n...w.+ Mrv. ~ II V r 1 Yl ~ ~ t r 1 i ~ Texas Department of Transportation 2824 W. PRAIRIE DENTON. TEXAS 78201.5117 (840) 387-1414 : ' . February 17. 1998 Control: 81-04-018 Highway, U.S.377 County: Denton Ms, Cecile Canon. Executive Director Keep Denton BeautiAd P.O. Box 374 Denton, TX 76202 Dear Ms. Carson, Th:% is to confirm our conversation this morning about landscaping on U.S. 377, Plans for the above referenced project include souk provisions for fume landscaping (casings for irrigation lines). If the City of Denton selects this location, we will need to coordinate your efforts with those of our contractor, Jagoe Public, Inc., We expect that we will not have problems with coordination as long as you are able to with to begin nay work until Jailed has completed their work in the areas you propose to landscape. Completion of the project Is currently scheduled for March 1949. If revisions to the roadway plans are needed to better socor rrwdate your project, you an coordinate with Mr. 1 Jerry Clark, P. E. (the engineer responsible for the design) and Chris W. Behnke, P.E. (TxDOT Assistant Area Engineer), I Please feel free to all if you need anything further, t I, Sincerely, Claud P. Elsom 1D, P.E. i Am Engineer cc: Bill check It. l Pat Haigh Jerry Clark Tim Massey Ae fpwrOppIAny EMPOW f ~,rj. A. t +,I i.t'I 6v° 4 1 tl,~ 1 ~ .4`1 i ~J}I+. L~r~v. ~~r~G y.n ( °.~°d et I ~SIi ~lt ki 4 ~ yJq,: p ut,n 'II ill ,.nl I 1 'f I J 1 1 .Jr` h l ~ i ! A! . 1 L~ 1 ~P J , 0^' I 4 ~ ^ ~y21 ~f i f , I i 11 ~ t t V 1 ~ . :i1dS[i1 E ' f , r n °JJ 1 " ' i , f , Texas Department of Transportatlon P.O. BOX 3087. MUM, TEW 7522 (214) 320-0100 March 12, 1998 ; Control 81.4 U. S. 377, Denton Denton County Ms. Cecile Carson, Executive Director Keep Denton Beautiful P. 0. Box 374 Denton, TX 76202 Dear Ms. Carson: I recently fecelved a copy of Mr, Buz Elsom's letter regarding landscaping on Fort Worth Drive (US 377), We believe that this section of roadway has a very good potential for landscape development. As Mr. Elsom stated, we should work to install the landscape without Interfering with the present contractor. Our recent experiences with landscape development projects, we have found that we generally get a better Installation and a lower cost when we separate the projects from the preceding roadway construction project, Since Mr, Elsom stated in his letter that the roadway should be compimed next March, we should plan to take bids on a landscape development project In February, This would mean the plans should be in Austin by November. We can begin to develop ~ the landscape plans now, and make any necessary changes if significant changes occur on the roadway. I will ask Tony Lucido to proceed with a conceptual plan for this section and send a copy to you and Mr, Etsom for comments before developing construction documents. It you have any questions, please contact me at (214)320.8205 or Mr. Lucido at (214)320.6638, J' Sincerely, Patrick J. Haigh District Landscape Architect cc: Tony Lucido • Buz Elsom, P, E. • • C•1 ~iyrtf rr ~ l M 64 dtq~unJly Empblrr - r, ,1, 2 .hx1❑ 32x0 r SMMYYW ` ! p `r a i J Texas Department of Transportatlon PA. Box 3067 DALLAS, TEXAS 75221.306741 (214) 320-0100 November 17, 1597 ,i Ms, Cecile Carson Keep Denton Beautiful P.O. Box 374 Denton, TX 76202 Dear Cecile; We have reviewed the IH 35E and Ave. D site as a potential landscape she for the Govemors Community Achievement Award and discussed the location with the engineering office In Denton. There are a few constraints oonceming landscape development in this area. One of the design considerations Is modular retaining walls (a decorative type landscape wall) to replace the existing concrete traffic barrier wall, The problem Is that modular retaining walls do not meet highway regulations since they do not meet r the crash standards (they are unforgiving). Therefore, they must comply with our 30 foot clear zone policy, Setting that s back 30 feet would defeat our purpose. Another concern Is that the slopes In this area have a tendency to fall. This Is the reason for placement of the concrete traffic barrier on the east slope to hold the soil. If an Irrigation system is installed It will Increase the chances of slope failure due to added moisture in the soil. There are also long term plans to widen Ill 35E making it six lanes. The reality of this , would occur more than 10 years from now. I hope this addresses some concerns for this Intersectlon. If 1 can be of further assistance, please contact me at (214) 320-6636. Sincerely, G , Tony Lucido Landscape Architect An E04OvP Fr *&F ; y ❑ 32X 0 , r v " h i IiIK i11U % s , . " i HOrf10rstO, Clear Zooe Standards y. (Driveways and Olher Roadside Obstructions) Location Functional Design Avg. Dally _Clear Zone WWih (f6) Classifkatioa Speed (mph) Traffic) Mlafmrtn Deairsbk y Rural Freeways All All 30 (16' for romps) Rural Arterial All 0. 730 10 16 750,1500 16 30 1500 or mute 30 / Rural Collector 45 or more All Use above rurat arterial criieria 40 of less All 10 l Rurat Local All All r to N Urban Frcesvays All All` r - - ` { 30(16 for ramps) Y Urban Ali (curbed) 45 or less All 1.5 from curb Not Urban All (uncurbed) 43 of more All use above rural arterial criteria t7 Urban All (uncurbed) 40 or less All lo' Urban All (curbed) 50 or mote All Use above rural arferint* L criteria insofar as available border width peimits. Yy i • e Average ADT over project h ft. I.e., 0.3 (picsent AM and future ADT). Use tool ADT un two-frayroadways, • directional ADT on one-way roadways. ' W/O barrier or other safely treatment or appurtenances, Measur.d from edge of travel lane for all cut sections and rut all fill sections where side gropes are 61 or fla(ter. Where fill slopes are steeper than 6A h is desirable to provldc a harard•free area beyond the loo of slope. Desirable, rather than minimum, values should be uscu where feasible, For low speed (cuibed 43 mph or les+ st+reds, uncurbM 41) n ph or Ir%% speed%) streets, cross drnfnage ullverl ends minimally should be olis•fl 4' from bxk ail curb us 4' from uutslde edge of %Wu6les. 32x10 }.:4,.J .7 r r, r rf wlt% "Vr y:M r s- c.. u - , >r;:A ,,..r!.r.,{., c.. ,f r.. •,.trr.„,e ,.=',;1' d M~A:i e 9. u, r{•,: 1ri } IJ I I 1, k f.::, .,"r .t •h.,..o-.. „ L 9 f u .Y 1t . .fi {t c v .f t' 4~:rM-.t W5, a % ~ y f ,•ii r! y rl. 1 r ,~I t~^ ' 15 x,~A^jy";~I~,. q,. A i;. A 1'{ , l i r a.; f I ! r`. A VA l r I a %T r r {~.x'~'f ".ty 1 t % 5 I ! u~ e, v r f r < S` r n. r I' i, . I t R a ° ' Ira I I X 1 : y"N a+ ~I 1 y a i r I I'I„ . I r i e, r ~!*r r 4 4 s A~ , ! ! r l ~ f r ~.1 t ~ 1 i I I f I f ~y t y f e' W ~y.. A ~ r` rl r N r( ` 1 IV rL f{ 31r,, f r~rf♦ ari' INN, Man, 1-0 tall-M 1-mm-py a ~ ti fr ~ A 'YWfMl+rw i_ 1 ~'re y"0 ~~~~r+~ ~e r tK 1W~ ` r 1 r/ ~r +r )III A ' ~ .9r ♦rI y r f IYi17i .r r ~1 f r i ~ r~ *loop, r 1rq r y /i~ to ~M r , it ~ yl ri5 .a i a~ q~-~~ .S r -'n'om t~3.~.'rs!~^ sr I IJ(t \ r S~ I ......ulurruuue.ureuun.u.n.tu.u.urru.u.uu.~..rn..' 0.100 rui~. uuu . n p1H ['~Z t7d4prrr / a+to ~a aua auo o~+a o-loo i,5 ;;°••j,+' i% J A _ rtOt' PA 1114 I CS' - }~t SN1N 1 ,....~ere• ati: i / r f : •uu a u uumus Y rr nrnv,• L• • ua uu. p > px % ML iv'i Sr, I _ 1 r i SCALE: lm =1000m 10 rx 32X10 r (r,~'~'~1 rf%.. . 1, Y': ➢ :.,I . ; i l ,.i:' r r r.r i~ , t "Y• ;!1 . i. .y I! i+v x~7ef, ,"n n . r r I~'. .x C I ~rx.,,,. :h 14 1 n Fi }r ~ r S `,r " r" .s , a r , .1,. ,+.4 ➢ yy a{ , vt!f~''i1 ri,. r .i 16~. ,k ,s1, ~r e ti~rn a~, J~p .rfvv W. ,,1 ! r v.. r:;.:,r. ~ ,,.,}pi .,1 .r ~ 1 , ti n d r ..,;,'v ri t .'~e ~ G'~Y, r. i !~C ~1~~,q .Yore I .r. 1.. r r e p, it., 1~ ,•f ,i':k{" 1 i x! a➢ ,"rF 1 { n~', H') , t i..:a I 1. ,rn ~"w rye. rl5 p ,.zf I e ' "I r I .:I v >wr •d t,G Ja a i + 'l v 9 h c" i .'.n r~~', tyi.➢'N r I , v ~ f ~°nA ' h ~ I ' 'ti°xx a,i ~~dr~~~n$~,~4i`+~ 41 ~IYL G ~ ~9_..l~I.GY.f _ r~' I r \ I ' r ~ Y ' ~ I f h ~ 1 tl r x i s V,F 111Lei r e r ' 'f ~ ° { Y / r k.. r "45~a~{ 41 ~ f ~e T~,r Y ~ i~ t A r 1 l I II" I x. r.'r , t r L r• t. r r: . Yt7®R h v k t f a r i r t ' i Y,,,r,' •I t~ J r, r 14 f 4, i r , it ,i .t P` r V 1r1r ' rl ,fr 1 I i a ~ r "p {I t wn t ' IT, ..tea., _ al~'M'RRMimM,aawawrr.+ ._..-w~:~u"..«u.~uArJUAtl11~'WW~IJAMi~~'A ~J'~~ '1 ~ ~ hR f 7 a Ar IA r I,n i JKI. ~r w, ,4r o I A I, O=- rar/4 unur, %,a West at0*9811 moves a,Gurra,rn ~Nw uuu„eu uuuutau~r arfJ rre ` i u 1 ,Q;rIO 7't10 0466 6QI0 1 x760 D7A0 0400 1 . . . . . . . 125 OPA nt - , , alHt10 969320 n2 J _}~~....~r+rrwd f i 777 1 YrriiR er,taat aaavnlu rrau. rn.rrart~aauu ae.rS,aur u• it PA SYI r I as r l rA x~r ~ 0 I y e w n., W.r I .au., Pr1Q ld „ ~ n.rn^.. ~ ,..1* ~ ^'P~„ X• ,{_r i'~ 'I r" ~1' '~q'.~MInM,R'~+.•y~: • Y ~.....•~~y. r. SPAlA~r rl , 'Y idtl ~i! ~r ,!bPix1 X5+8 ^.:''r d 4 X 32 X 10 r:' I' 25'X I ` r r i C ~ V , ✓ti ~f Y ,AIU , il' 4 I r✓ Ytt~ dit y t ( ~ nu ,1 ."l d i ~ J.r I 2,i ~ f 1 .Aid ~yti 472 , t Y ~ r ~u ~ t ~f 1,: I 14 nt fA~ h„ , r 4! r if l t •'Y n 9~ k.r i h A,n i I Y S ti i ,Ir r it jri 1~ l •t 5~ t ~ c x ~ c vr~'" ~ dt ~I . i r ~ r L A 1 y 1 ~i 1 4 K } t.:3'A.u'MY.d A'n, ).:1lAw i'rYlaEwiYCMaLL„Gr+n +anr~ ~ 'f-,~i;r ~ ,r S~ dys a"u:.,+. w.rtir~~w.r.a,..v....... . ~ Sej"Y: _ , ~ i LANDSCAPE MEDIANS r 1 r 11~y'Ey y~ gg~~✓~l ~ i 01 y , f Teasley Lens at Was DM Dallas OM at Rlo Grande Blvd. Example of TXDOT PaAnerohip Dallas Ortve at Rio Grand* Blvd. ,t. Example of TXDOT Partnership n~ 1 l Gos aw's Commalty Ad&vemml Award 1 4 r ~g~.~,; i C 32 x b ('J I fib i F O as CITY MAIIAGfF 07.07.10 30~OSa r.:; V G CITY'O?bg'I'T'o4tltlsYCl)I,JNC'1LMINl11ES ` August 26,1997 + l After determining that a quorum Has present and convening in an open meeting, the City Council convened in a closed meeting on Tuesday, August 26. 1997 at 5:15 p.m. in the Police Conference Room of the Benton Municipal Complex, PRESENT- Mayor %Iltler, Mayor Pro Tom Brock; Council Members Beasley, Kiistoferson, Cochran, Durrance and Youag ABSENT: None I, fhcC'ounctlconsidered the(ol)otvinginClosed Meeting: IN, Conference with Employees Lender TF.X r;OYIT CODE Sec. 111.071. The Council received information from employees or questioned employees during a staff con fercnce or briefing, hue did not deliberate during the conference, The Council comered Into a Work Session cm Tuesday, August 26, 1997 at 6 00 p,m. in the Central lur) Room of the Denton MunicipalCompte-4 r 1, The Council held a joint meeting with the Keep Denton Beautiful Board regarding recommendations for use of the Govemor's Community Achieycmcnt Award. Larry %lullens, Chair-Keep Denton Beautiful Board, stated that the City had been awarded the Onvemor's Community' Achievement Award for a landscape project that had to he designated on a State nght-of•wav. The Board did not have a definite site for consideration but had several proposals. Once the decision was made at the City level for a location. tr+t process would gn to t`,e Highway Department for comiderat ion, Circile Carson, Planner 111. stated that T%Dot provided funding of this type on an annual basis Denton was one of nine tkinncrs tvid this was the third time Denton had rectlved thin funding The award this year was for 561),000 Factors fer site selection involted safety, visibility, future constnuction, snJ support network for maintenance, The nett step was the development content that was done to decide 7pecific elements of the project, The preliminary design stage would be done by Txl)a As this was not a grant but an outright money gift, no matching funds by the City " were required and the City needed no landscaping design The final approval stage had to be approved by TxDot. Once the plan was finally adopted, it wuuld be bid by T%Nt and a contract awarded TsDol .could work with the contractors for construction, have a final inspt6on with a maintenance phase included There were a number of proposed sites with pros and cons for each site One proposed site wa± Avenue D at 1.33E' This site was highly visible. had a potential of connecting with landscaping being done at LINT and the projedl design could be similarto a project done in Richardson that TxDot could use. Cons far this site included the possible construction or 3 new bridge or road widening which could eliminate the site and the requircnt<nt of the City by 0 • Txbot to assume the mainitrlmce on 1.)5, Ancti,er site was Fort Worth (Drive at 1.31 to Collins J Street This site was part of the Trr)nl road construction project, was visible from WISE and Fort ~b Worth Drive, turd was included as a priority entrance that needed improvement by the original t Beautification Task Force. The cons for this silo included the timing of the road construction project set to begin In January 1998. An I.35w' entrance marker was another possible site. Pros for this site included the fart that this was a CiP approved projectwith strong citizeneonlmitment. Cons indicated that the marker was not on gtato right•of.vvap. TxDot would require City maintcnanct of I.31E and the limited use of landscape. A redbud planting, another proposed 12 ✓ r 0 wanasrr O • v I ;I FPC41 CITY nAHAG[F FV No.i P40'494594 1J-07.91 10;"15 v y ('it) of Denton City Council %linutes L August 26, 1997 Page ` project, would have a faster implementation since there was less design required but the locations were limited to 30' from the road or along slopes. An 1-35 wildflowers planting, the last proposal. had the pros of faster implementation since less design was required and a seasonal impact. A con for that site was Ihul it %%ould be hard w determine a success faetorand was a seasonal impact. May or Miller stated that there rras no recommendationfrnm the Board Carson replied no that the Committee had asked for a joint meeting in order to discuss where the project should K- located Mayor Pro 'Tern Brock stated that her first choice would be As erue D at 1.35E. One side of the intersectionhad a vets prepy yard and the other side had no landscaping at all and looked very bad. Some type of work nccded to be done in that area as it was one of the main entrances to the IJnivcrsityof North Tcvas 1 Council Slembcr Bcaslry asked if there was bond money for beautifrcationor for roadwork only, Rick Svehla. Doputy City Manager, stated that that money csas for roadwork only. UNT had indicated that they would have some money mailable for landscaping and entrance markers io the CantscrOy Council %lrmber Braslev asked about lar dscaping money for Fort Wonh Drive, S% W3 stated that !here tray a small amount of money for landscaping from 1.35 to Collins Street Most of ihr right-nf-v%ay rss narrow and would he hardscared. I Co,tncil Member Beasley stated that she would be in favorofeitherofthe fitstiwu projects. i Council Member Xjistoferson stated that her preference would be the redbud planting as 1.35 was so visible for visitors In Itcnton, Her second eholce would l,e Fort Worth Drive. Council Member Young inJieatedthai the entrance marker to Dallas Drive needed some work, as it " was hard to see One area to consider was landscaping Dallis Drive all the way to Bell Avenue. ; Council Member Cochran stilledthat the wildflo Aer ploting would be his preference, That ptoject could cost kss with money as ailahle fat other projects. I Council NIcmbcr Durrance stated the all of the projects had merit The entrance market was already in the CIP and he unuld not recommend that project. Initially he was interested in redbud • planting He suggested finding th. projetit that would visualize the maximum amount for the dollarsasailable. 0 Mayor Miller stated that the two ptevious projects made a difference in the greets. Hie opinion was ( for a more noticeable difl'erenceas frith the overpass at Avenue D and he would favor that project. 1 Sdullen$ slated that there would be a board inciting with a committee set up for Council consideration The time frame needed to be worked on. Matching funds could be put into the project along r, iih the award money 13 ? h x~ 32 x 41 I r ' r 1 0 it I 111 KEEP DENTON BEAUTIFUL, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES ` OCTOBER 14, 1997 PRESENT: GERI ASCHENBRENNER, CAROLYN BACON, THOMAS EDMUNDSON, " BETH CLARK, RAY CROFF, JAN DICKSON, BOBBIE CATES, RON FORSYTHE, ALICE GORE, LITTIE GROOMS, JACQUELINE KING, SARAH LaGRONE, VERA LANEY, LARRY MULLEN, HARRY PHILLIPS, MABEL SAUNDERS, SARAH SAUNDERS AND DEE DEE d:OTT ABSENT: A19ITA BYROM, KEVIN KASPAREK, MARK OSBORNE, BARBARA SEARLS iND BILL SWAIN STAFF: CECILE CARSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND SHERRILL CAMPBELL, SECRETARY I. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 1ittie Grooms made a motion to approve the minutes. The notion was seconded by Larry Mullen and carried unanimously. II. OLD BUSINESS A. CONSIDER MAKING A RECOMMENDATION ON THE GOVERNOR'S COMMUNITY ACHIEVEMENT AWARD SITE Cecile Carson reported that the proposed landscaping site on Fort Worth Drive cavern an area of 10,431 square feet at costs varying from $40,302. to $65,336. for irrigation, landscape materials and trees. Ms. Carson stated that the appearance of the landscaping would be similar to Teasley Lane and Dallas Drive using more diversity in tree species similar to University Drive. Ms. Carson stated that there is a possibility of including some of the redbud trees donated to KDB by Bill Utter Ford. Ms. Carson stated that TXDOT is going to investigate the area of the Avenue D bridge over I-35. Another location discussed was the Welcome to Denton sign on Dallas Drive using wildflowers to cover the slope to the street side of the sign. The Finance Committee has discussed the possibility of selling wildflowers to be used in public plantings as a gift for Christmas, birthdays, anniversaries and other holidays. Larry Mullen made a motion to'recommend the Fort Worth Drive site to the City Council. The motion was sscon Ud by Harry Phillips and carried unanimously. Cecile Carson anticipated that the recommendation would go the Council in 0 November or December. She continued that r, TXDOT representative will be providing information on Ave. D before we present the recommendation to Council. i 14 32x10 r Y Y~ t 1 • 1. . r -ANA" O . G Agenda No. Agenda Item Date.! AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: Aprit 14,1998 DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development CM/DCMIACM: Rick Svehla?,:!~ SUBJECT Receive a funding recommendations report from the Community Development Advisory Committe. ;CDAC) and the Human Services Committee (HSC) and hold a discussion regarding the proposed 1998 City of Denton Action Plan for Housing and Community Development, (James McDade, C'DACC'hair and Fran Moore, HS'C Chair are scheduled to provide briefings.) BACKGROUND I On an annual basis, the City of Denton prepares an Action Plan for submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The Action Plan serves as the city's application for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and ROME Investment Partnerships program funding. In 1995, using a process with extensive input from citizens and local nonprofit organizations, staff developed Denton's Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development. The Consolidated Plan is a five-year strategy detailing housing, social sen ice and public works projects benefiting low and moderate-income households and neighborhoods. Annual Action Plans are developed based on the strategies outlined in the Consolidated Plan. The 1998 Action Plan represents the fourth year of the City's five-year strategy for housing and community development. Public hearings requesting citizen input regarding the use of CDBG and 140ME funds time held in December, Application availability was advertised in December and • January, Staff held application workshops in January. CDAC and HSC held funding heariugs during February an I Slarch. Both committees developed a set of funding recornmendations to present to City Council. Staff has integrated these recommendations into the 1998 Action Plan for council review. Page 8 of the Action Plan booklet provides a list of the activities recommended for 1998 funding. Please refer to your 1998 Action Plan booklet for additional information. This booklet (il eowains a copy of the proposed 1498 Action Plan and minutes of the CDAC and 11SC p Q meetings Retain this booklet./brJurure meetings. i Page 1 >r i 0 ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT Public comment period March 29 through Aril 30 Action Plan public hearing Aril 21 City Council considers approval of Action Plan May 12 Submission of Action Plan to NUM June 1 Environmental review process May 15 through July 20 Release of funds b HUD August 4 _ Project initiation August 5 PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, BoardL Commissions) Community Development Advisory Committee members have developed recommendations for use of $1,715,481 in CDBG and HOME funds on housing, capital improvements, nonprofit facility improvements and program administration. CDAC also recommended that the HSC allocate CDBG funds in the amount of S 179,547 to human services activities. This amount represents the maximum amount of CDBG funds that can be used for human services activities. CDAC Committee minutes are included on pages 55 to 76 of the Action Plan booklet. i The Human Services Committee members developed recommendations for the use of $179,547 in CDBG funds and 5201,353 in the city's General Fund. Though the Action Plan indicates that the HSC is recommending use of general fund dollars, approval of the Action Plan does not approve HSC's General Fund recommendations. Human Services Committee recommendations for the General Fund budget will be included in the normal budgetary process. See pages 77 to 164 of the Action Plan booklet for HSC minutes. KCAL. INFORMATION All projects and programs approved under the 1998 Action Plan are funded with CDBG and HOME funds. No general fund dollars are included in the proposed 1998 Action • Plan. f See Attachment A, page 4 for the 1998 CDBG and HOME funding summary. See Attachment B, pages 5 and 6 for 1998 funding recommendations. See pages 3 through 4 of your acl~on plan booklet for funding amendments to prior year plans. • BID INFORMATION • • Each project will be bid as required by local, State and Federal law, Page 2 ~r 32XIO 141, ~ 3 t it y 1 SrY 1 VV v IVY E. 1.. ?I• r r i ~Y t ,F " j ~51 , p ~V~ `r e axV r , - ~i f x 1 T ~r ~ q,tl ~11w I; v.~, t c + v .el v r'~ ~ is fi M1 ` I i .r. 1 y t h i ' 'f r ( 4 . r I p + I 1 7 1 4 y t V ~ ~ y 1 xrY~O ' i ~ I . , r ' k 11 . % F? ~k ' r MAP 1 A projectlactivities map is included on page 43 of the Action Plan booklet. u; { Respectfully suubbfmitted Dave Hill Director of Planning and Development Prepared by: % Barbara Ross Community Development Administrator Attachment A: Community Development Funding Summary, page 4 Attachment B: CDAC and HSC Funding Recommendations Chart, pages 5 -6 Attachment C: Human Services Committee 1999 Funding Recommendations Chart, page 7 Attachment D: Letter from CDAC regarding Carpenter Rd, and Gayla/Bridges wastewater projects, page 8 Provided under separate cover: 1998 Action Plan booklet (Includes Action Plan, CDAC and HSC minutes.) + '1 . o , Page 3 x1d xlt7 32 b4 41E~kr~i<. r. , *ARAM ~0 a ' y Y r ice. .:.ar.,, 4 a. m .t,3.: Y• .C~3:Lk`k1.u.11{F~MOr4~YM1~M.. , , ~ _ - ....~w,a,,-..~.w.,w;ri-re'.~v A+M1full'1 an+Ja~MMI r IWc.,:.r /y 1 ~ 7 e. { ATTACHMENT A „r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDING SUMMARY 1998 PROGRAM YEAR i 1998 1998 FUNDING AVAILABLE CDBG GRANT HOME GRANT TOTAL A. 1998 Entitlement Grant S 1,061,000 S 482,000 S 1,543,000 B. 1997 Reallocated Funds $ 135,981 $ $ 135,981 C. 1998 Program Income (Proposed) $ 31,000 S 5,500 S 36,500 10 D. Funds Allocated to Administration Activities S (239,396) S (48,200) $ (287,596) ` 1 13. Total Funds Available for Applications $ 988,585 S 439,300 S 1,427,885 Pe;e 4 l •r 1 S. i s'. 25x ~ 32XIO O ti 1 REVISED. April 1, 1998 PLANNING I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION CDAC AND HSC FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS 1998 PROGRAM YEAR 1996 two FUNDING CDBO GRANT HOME GRANT 1196 TOTAL COMMITTEE 1996 ACTFIATIES I PROJECTS REQUESTED $966,669 $439,300 GENERAL FUND RECOMMENDED CDAC Carpenter Rd. Wastewater project 114,740 0 0 0 0 CDAC Carpenter Rd Water I- rojed 57.610 37,610 0 0 37,610 CDAC Demoirton Pr rem 73,400 50,000 0 0 5D,000 CDAC Denton Affordable Housing Cori. -Afford obk Housing Prog 100,000 0 100,000 0 100,000 CDAC Denton AffordobfaHousing Corp - rati Costs 24,050 0 24,050 0 24,050 COAC Denton Affordable Housing Co - Transitional Housing 30.000 0 0 0 0 CDAC DentonC Co. Da Nurse Root 7,775 7,775 0 0 7,775 CDAC Denton Co. Friends of the Family Sheffer • Electrkal Rehab. 9,667 9,867 0 0 9,567 CDAC Donlon Community Development Co40,200 0 0 0 0 COAC Ems ncy Repair Program 50,000 50.000 0 0 50,000 CDAC Fairhaven Retirement Home, Inc. Rehabilitation 33,294 23,294 0 0 23294 CDAC fred Moore Da Nurse School - Plaround 14,030 11,630 0 0 11,630 y a CDAC Ga WBrid es Wastewater Project 374,620 0 0 0 0 CDAC Ga IuBrid es Water Pr 'ed 92,660 82,660 0 0 92,880 z v COAC HomeD erAssislanc4P ram' 3500u0 3N6195 0 0 308,195 CDAC Homeowner Rehabilrlation Program' 383,211 72,307 240,904 0 313,211 a' COAC Masse Sheet Drainage Project 154,000 0 0 _ 0 0 CDAC Morse Street Culvert Project 226,000 0 0 0 0 CDAC OwsleSteel Repave and Sidewalk Construction Project 129,000 132,200 0 0 132,200 CDAC 5 uoia Park Speed Hums Pro'ecl 13,500 13,500 0 0 13,500 CDAC South Central Street Pavm Project 112,000 0 0 0 0 CDAC Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program, F_airNwn Inc' 79.196 0 74,346 0 14,346 COAC Wood St. Drainage 91,000 0 0 0 0 HSC Adutl Day Core of North Texas 15,000 12,000 0 0 12,000 HSC AIDS Services of North Texas 15,000 12,000 0 0 72,000 MSC Boys 5 Girls CIUD of Donlon Cc 24,086 4,847 0 4,153 9,000 HSC Cam Summit Inc 0,000 0 0 6,000 6,000 HSC Children's CMnic, Denton Khvanis 20,000 0 0 0 0 HSC Community rood Color 4,000 0 4,000 4.000 1 i r A f r}"r./r,•'' i ~..7 32X . I L7 ii j. 4 % I i 1 REMSEO: April 1.1998 . PLANNING !COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION COAC AND HSC FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS 1998 PROGRAM YEAR 1991 1 FUNDING CDOG GRANT HOME GRANT 1191 TOTAL tHS 1990 ACTMTIES i PROJECTS REQUESTED 1900,806 1431,300 GENERAL FUND RECOMMENDED 3 Court painted S dal Advocates, Denton Co. 10,000 O 0 8,000 8,000 Denton City CoDa Scholl 23,D00 0 23,000 23,000 Denton CaChildren's Adv Center 20,1 0 9,000 9,000 Denton Co. Coo Ministries 14,900 0 0,000 1 HSC Denton Co Mental Heft Mental Retardation SIERRA Pr ram 16,616 15,000 0 0 15,000 HSC Denton County Friends of the Fami, 40,000 0 41 40,000 HSC Denton Fr i Resource Center 20.000 0 5,000 5,000 HSC D I S 0 Home Instruction Pr ram for Preschool Youn stern 14,722 0 0 0 0 HSC DISD Teens Taki Responsibility in Parentis Success 10,000 10,000 0 0 10,000 HSC FalrhIi RelirementHome 11,000 11 0 0 9,500 HSC Family Heath Can, Ina. 30,000 20,000 0 0 21 HSC First Texas Coundl Cam Fas Bn I 8 Gids 10,000 111 0 5,000 y HSC Fred Moore Day Nursery School 37,1 0 0 37,000 37,071 1 li HSC HOPE, Inc. 30,000 25,000 0 6,000 31 rD HSC Interfaith Ministries of Denton 12,000 0 0 12,000 12,000 -4 HSC Mothers Against Drunk Oriv 11i Tern Chapter 1,280 0 0 0 0 W HSC North T%. Human ResourceGrou 30,000 10000 0 O 10,000 HSC PARD, ASA$ and TRAC SchoWships 23,780 16.000 0 0 15,000 HSC PARR MLK"Its Kids Da Kam 27,974 22,000 0 0 22,000 HSC PARD, Owsle Summer Pa round Pr ram 18,051 14,000 0 0 14,000 HSC REACH. Inc 10,100 6,200 0 0 6,200 HSC Rldl Unlimded 3,6M 0 0 3,000 31 HSC RSVP 8,500 0 0 8,200 0,200 HSC SPAN, Inc 28,000 0 O 20,000 28000 HSC S cial0l m iti, Denton namos 15,000 0 9,000 9,000 0 HSC UNT Student Health Center 21 0 0 0 0 Communi pevel menlAdministration 207,596 239,396 48,200 287,596 ~oyf i0iAL3 _ $3.090,89 2 01,227,181 "07.600 1201 753 $1 122 834 CDAC a Community Development Advii Commin" NSC ■ Noma lotirkaa Corr mm" ' Tneu sc'avnas wr also be aHeded M amer4mm:a made to Moms Adios Plans P1nss sam pope 3.5 of ft Mien Plan twoelal for a dalM7ed *Vkv a W on M brildr not TF4 ~r 32 x ` r I Q I 4 %Mom ATTACBMENT C HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1998 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS 1999 1998 Recommend6on6 Agency 1995 1996 1997 R4Que11ed core offirland Fund Adult Day Care of North Texas 12,000 12,000. 15000 :2,00 0 AtOS Services of North Texas 7,500 10,000 15,004 15,000 12,000 0 Boys & Girls Clubs of Denton County 7,600 24,086 4,847 4,153 , Camp Summit, Inc 3,000 8,000 8,000 0 6.000 Children's Clinic, Denton Kwanis 20,000, 0 0 Community Food Center 3,500 3500 3.500 4,000 0 4,000 Court Appointed Special Advocates of Demon Co. 10,000 0 8,000' Denton City-Co. Day School 21,000 21,000 23,000 23,000 0 23,000 Denton Ca. Children's Advocacy Center 10,000 20,000 0 9,000 Denton Co Cooperative-Ministries 7,000 14,900 0 8,000 Denton Co. Friends or the Family 31 40,000 40.000 40,000 0 40,000 Denton Co MHMR (Respite Care) 15.000 14,153 OenlonCo MHMR(SIERRA) 18,616, 15,00' 0 Denton Family Resource Center 5,000 20,000 0 5,000 D1S0 HIPPY 14,722 0 0 DISO TTRIPS 10000 10,000 14,000 10,000 10,00 0 Fairhaven Retirement Home 10,000 11,000 11,000 11,00 9,500 0 Family Health Care, Inc 31,000 55,000 0 30,00 20,000' 0 First Texas council or Camp Fire Boys & Girls 3,300 10,00 5,00' 0 Fred Moore Day Nursery School 35,000 35,000 37,100 37,00 0 37,00 HOPE. Inc. (3090 Program) 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,00 0 5,00 HOPE Inc (Trans Housing) 26,000 25,000 25,000 25,00 25,00 0 interfaith Ministries of Denton. Inc. 7,500 8,250 90,00 12,00 0 12,00 Juvenne Dversionary Services of Denton 11,000 Library 10,000 Mothers Against Drunk Driving NT Chapter 1,280 0 0 North Texas Human Resource Group 28,432 30 00 10,00 0 North Texas Human Resource Group 3,566 Parks (ASASITRAC Scholarsi 23,780 15,00 0 Parks (Alternative Avenues Program) 5,000 5,754 0 Parks i Kings Kids Day Kamp) 16,750 21 25,0 27,974 : 22,00 0 Forks IOwsley Summer Playground Program) 11,750 18,011 16.400 15,951 14,00 0 REACH, Inc 10,40 5,200' 0 Riding Unlimited 3,000 3,600 0 3,00 RSVP 7,800 7,600 6200 .8,500 0 8,200 SPAN, Inc 26000 26,000 26000 2600 0 200 Speaal Olymp,Cif Denton Dynamos 15,000 9,251 15,00 0 9,00 Special Olympics, Denton Dynamos 743 , TWU CARES Health Center 21 lazo 24.000 UNT Student Health Center 28,920 0 0 0 , 1998 TOTAL REQUESTED :579,129 CO SO (Shaded) 161,000 118,000 1163,651 $179,547 GENERAL FUND 5651100 163,868 1165,443 =207,353'" TOTAL FUNDED 1721,100 1349,166 1340,100 3388,900 • Programs not funded In the previous budgel yes? fleshed o4ma,9e ''General fund Dudgtl InereasI d $41-010 Page 7 Syr,. ,rs :i~ a: y ry [ v1 v, aT I_! 32 L~ + ~a a , + a, ~v Aeat+a~ i't e r r1 ATTACHMENT[ D { • I MEN 40RANDUM To: Mayor and Members of the City Council i From: Community Development Advisory Committee Subject: Carpenter Road and GaylaBridges Area Wastewater Needs Date: April 14, 1998 I On February 21 the Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) reviewed the applications for Community Development Block Grant and HOME progrem funding. These applications included requests by the City's Water(Wastewater Department for improvements in the Carpenter Road and GayWBridges area. Total funding requested for water and was,-water improvements in these two areas was $619,6NI. While committee members agreed that the need for improvements was great, they also agreed that the total amount of funding requested was "above and beyond CDAC's scope of funding." Funding for these project; alone represented over 300/a of the CDBG dollars available for projects. r Based on the information provided and the funding available, CDAC is recommending that CDBG funds of $130,270 be used to provide City water services to the households on Carpenter Road and in the Gayla/Bridges area. The committee further recommends, due to the serious health concerns arising from the lack of wastewater services In these two areas, that the City of Denton find other sources of funding to provide services to these neighborhoods. Community Development Advisory Committee members thank you for the opportunity to provide input on these issues. Please let us know if you have questions or need additional information regarding any of the committee's recommendations. Sinc 0 James McDade 0 9 Chair Community Dwelopmcnt Advisory Committee Page a I C] 32x10 mom 0 SAW" Apinda No.~7V'r/! Gr. Ag nda Itern oat, _ AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: April 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT: Economic Development Department ACM: Kathy DuBose, Assistant City Manager of Finance SUBJECT Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the extension of the 1998 deadline for obtaining a tax exemption for designated historic sites. BACKGROUND In 1997. the City Council adopted an ordinance for the purpose of encouraging the preservation of individually designated historic sites by providing for a reduction of the City's property tax to qualifying properties. The ordinance provides a fifty percent (501/6) tax exemption for designated historic sites, which includes "any structure and the land necessary for access to and use of the structure." The exemption has a ten-year term. The ordinance also provides for recapture of the taxes if within 25 years of receiving an exemption, the property is removed as a designated historic site. The removal of the designation may occur either at the request by the owner or in the event the property is totally or partially destroyed or altered by the willful or negligent act of the owner. City Council has several options to consider regarding this ordinance: I . City Council may increase or decrease the exemption. Currently the exemption is 50%, but you may increase it to 100°/a. 2. City Council may extend the 10-year exemption for a designate site. The Texas • Tax Code does not set a limit on the number of years the exemption may be given 3. City Council may extend the life of the ordinance for another ten years or indefinitely keeping the same terms a- the current ordinance. 4 Staff recommends that an ordinance be prepared that extends the deadline for obtaining • an historic site designation for another ten-year period (January 1, 1999 through O • December 31, 2008) and that the same leims P.nd conditions of the existing ordinance 1 apply. 1 fir, ❑ 32Xi❑` I i iI 1i le,t 1t.yY 5::, i ~ I>~er ?v1 i~ ~ f''. r;. ;',r I 1 ~ 9 s e. s e t r 6 i a i~ (Y1 ~ V"' ~ J f4c i n , ~,v n ~ u t TJ ~ e} 'w 1 } e T. vlAi ~ fal I a )s ~ , r ~ ;h lA I i f ~ I Y F ~ ~ .i , rl V ,tip, c~ 0 o e ~ n ~ ~ ra ri ~ ' ~ It e 4 ~'I i y x r IT i x. ` 'i f T P } .d r „ r Ya I ..y a'v..... :~N nA >l .w.: v.,•... 1. ,.r. .r4 .4ra.~.ti,"::. ~ _.w 1. I ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT The ordinance, itself, also has a ten-year iife and will expire on December 31, 1998. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW T The extension of the tax exemption ordinance has been discussed at a previous meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission and was received favorably. This item is scheduled for the Commission's April 13, 1998 meeting for formal recommendation to the City Council. FISCAL INFORMATION "A X11 In 1997, the total value exempted tinder this ordinance was $1,599,742, resulting in a total City ad valorem tax incentive of $8,210. „A In 1996, the total value exempted under this ordinance was $1,781,140, resulting in City rt resulting in a total City ad valorem tax incentive of $9,411. E)MIBIIS Ordinance 87.189 Respectfully submitted; J Linda Ratliff, Director Economic Development Department 2 ; I 3 25 ~ 10 32JO C 1 1649L NO. AN ORDI AMENI CHAPTER 22 CODE OF ORDINANCE$ TO PROP DE NFOR A PARTIAL TAX EXEMPTIONOFOR HDESIGNATED HISTORIC SITES RSPEA PERIOD OF TEN C YEARS', IFIED CASES; AND PROVIDING FOR RN EFFECTIVE DATE OF TAXES IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION a I• That Chapter Article IV to read Code of be amended e3-6` 6y YUS ARTICLE IV. TAX EXEMPTION OF DESIGNATED HISTORIC SITES Sec. 12.50. Purpose This article is enacted for the purpose of emcouragiog the preservation of individually designated historic sites by pro- viding for a reduction of the city's property ta•t to qualifying properties. Sec. 22-51. Definitions "Designated historic site" shell mean any structure, and the land necessary for access to and use of the structure, which is: 0. 1 (a) designated as a Recorded Texas Historical Landmark by the Taxis Historical Commission; or (b) individually designated as an "historic landmark,, the accordance with article 28A of Appendix g Code of Ordinances. For purposes of this article, a "designated historic site" shall not Include amy structure Inclusionh to ins historic district,sItelprovidede for iio article 18A. gi Sec. 22-S2. Partial Tax Exemption of Designated Historic sites (a) Any property which is a designated historic site on the first day of January for say year beglmmiag with 1940 and extending to sad including 1994, shall be exempt from real property ad vslorem taxes levied by the City of Denton to the extent of fifty (S01) percent of the assessed value of the designated historic site. The exemption provided for hereto shall apply for a maximum of ten (10) successive years, beginning with first year the property is entitled to the exemption during the specified years 3 .C.O P~,Mf MM+ 32 IX 1 1 I O I r I 1 and continuing and including each and every year of the nine (9) successive years thereafter during which the those nine historical site on the first day oroperty is o a designated (b) Immediately ive after Director first of a Planning and Community each year, the Execut D velop- sent shall notify the chief appraise[ of the Denton County Appraisal District of all designated historical sites that qualify herein~r a that year. prtax ovided exemption perr.gCe claimin xemption the the e the exemption must application form apply the for chthe ief appraiser Of heliDenton County Appraisal District as provided for by State law. Sec. 22-57. Recapture of Taxes M (a) If any designated historic site is, within twenty-five (2S) years from any year in which the property received a 1 tax exemption under this attic hi 1) removed as a designated historic site by ordinance, upon the request of the owner: or i 21 acemod fter it ahas been gdeterminedt to historic boon totally cor partially destroyed or altered by thewillful or negligent ■ct of the owner at the owner's agent, in violatiop of article 28A1 II an additional tax is imposed, on the effective date of the ordinance providing for its removal as a designated historic site, equal to the difference between the City taxes imposed for each year an exemption was made under this article, and the taxes that would have been Imposed had the exemption not hen mads, plus interest on the additional amount at an annual rate of seven (78) per- taaes would have become duedif not on which exempted the additional in providing for the removal of a property me a { • (b) If, designated historic se albecau of Its tered as provided being aD partially ve$ the or totally destroyed or city council, after receiving the determination of the Bistoric Landmark Commission and Planning and toning ' Commission, determines, after public hearing for which the owner shall be given notice, that the property was • totally or partially destroyed at altered by the willful C • or negligent act of the owner or his representative, in historic violation of the additional tax provided forthis section shall lbenimposed. i ( 1 O l ~c1 A tax lien attaches to the property on the date it is re- moved an a designated additional tax and iInterest i imposedsbyuthis section- The lien exists in favor of the City of Denton for which the additional tax is imposed. ld1 tThe Cit tax he additional ltaxtimposedlandtshall prepare a and a deliver a statement to the owner for the additional taxes plus inte,rest as soon as practicable a.-,ter removal of the property as a designated historic site. The taxes and interest are due and become delinquent and incur penalties and interest as provided by law for ad valorem taxes imposed by the City It not paid before the first day of February of tsxhe Imposed, the year in which the additional SECTION It. That it any section, subsection, Paragraph, sentence, c suss, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any Person or circumstance is hold invalid by any court of competent Jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the of the Ci wouldChav ilenactsd such remainingportions hdespiteeo nyasuch invalidity. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effactiv imma ate y upon its passage and appr val. PASSED AND APPROVED this theGday of 190 7. UMSUVOINS1 MAYOR • ATUM JS ran LTtRB, CITY SECRETARY APP V AS TO LEGAL FI)RXI DEBRA AD ADA1tI DRAYOVITCMFIs CITY ATTORNEY Q • BYt 5 41 • rUNIX" C u~eun I Agenda Na Agenda Item_ Date/ -9~ y AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: April 14,1998 DEPARTMENT: Economic Development (Main Street) ACM: Kathy DuBose, Assistant City Manager of Finance o UBJEC' : HOLD A DISCUSSION REGARDING AN ORDINANCE CREATING AN ABATEMENT OF TAXES ASSESSED BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS FOR APPROPRIATE REPAIRS AND RENOVATION OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS IN THE DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF DENTON BACKGROUND, Since the adoption of the Property Appearance Guidelines in 1997, the Vision Cabinc, and several boards, commissions,, and other groups have asked for tax incentives to encourage the use of the recommendatiorm In a Council work session in the fall of 1997, several Council members expressed interest in considering a tax incentive package. Staff has researched various types of incentives that could be applied to historic properties. Prior to developing this draft ordinance, discussions were held with th-. Historic Landmark Commission, the Downtown Development Advisory Board, and the Main Street Association. All groups agree that a tax incentive would help promote greater compliance with the Property Appearance Guidelines. Staff Ixl ieves that the best possible option for an abatement would be a tan freeze as presented in this draft ordinance. The ordinance would provide a valuation freeze on the City of Denton portion of property taxes for a ten year period for eligible structures. The freeze would apply to the structure and land reasonably necessary for access to, and use of the building. The main qualifications for eligibility would be: 1, Buildings 50 years old or older within the established target area; 2. Exterior rehab over 520,000 or 25°o of the most recent ta-c valuation of building, O whichever is less; and, 3. Rehab plans approved for compliance with Property Appearance Guidelines. • Pepe t a s 1~ 32xID . % I rawxr i I Review of construction plans and verification of completion will be done by the Historic Landmark Commission. Council must approve each tax abatement. This taK incentive applies only to substantial rehabs, It does not address less expensive projects that might have a significant visual impact without being costly. Signs and paint jobs are examples of projects that can make a huge impact on the overall effect of a building. In order to have some leverage for these types of projects, staff also recommends allocating approximately $3,500 annually to a grant fund that could be used for small grants of $300- $500 per building. We could require compliance with Property Appearance Guldelines in order to get these grants. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW: On March 20, a summary of the major points of the ordinance was approved unanimously during a joint meeting of the Downtown Development Advisory Board and the Main Street Association Board. The group also endorsed the concept of the sign and paint grant fund. The draft ordinance will be presented to the Historic Landmark Commission for recontmcWations on April 13. HLC's recommendation will be presented to Council at the work session on April 14. As Council members are aware, a National Register district nomination for the Courthouse square is currently being prepared by our preservation consultant, Lila Knight, The Historic Landmark Commission has discussed various types of incentives that could be used in conjunction with the National Register district. It is likely that the Historic Landmark Commission will propose additional preservation incentives after the National Register district is completed later this year. FISCAL INFORM 7~4 ION: The exact financial impact of the tax freeze is impossible to predict. However, the advantage to the City of Denton is that no reduction in current revenue is proposed. The tax Geeze would encourage rehabilitation that would add value to the tax roles after the completion of the ten year freeze. Based on the current effec live rate of 0.51315, for each $10,000 increase in property valuation, the City would forego $51.31 per yearor $513,10 for the ten-year freeze period. A $50,000 increase in the value of a building, for example, would "cost" the City $2,565.50. However, the frceze has the potential to encourage rehabilitation projects that might not otherwise have been done. a Pape 2 , z ~ x Cl 32 X lo ' S i r o i J 1 Cn ♦ PAL, n a i ! s pfv i i 0 7- I r ` 4 +4 r 1 r r I r nY - . A • r 0 r 1.`.t'hB .Pl W'1.1Y.n... ♦.r.w~W.•rS4~.+N4NV^M1~'L .+•~r V.♦; r'♦'I lSw p.,rn ~ ..a.r..vn.. f l < ~ 1 EXHIBITS* Draft ordinance Summary of common historic preservation incentives r Respectfully submitted: Linda Ratliff, Director Economic Development Department I I II Prepared by: I I Dcnisha Williams Main Street Manager ' Mi~ . , r: • Pepe 3 „r. x Q 32 X10 INK& 0 , ' Susan. . • : . 0 .l II, ORDINANCE N0, AN ORDNANCE CREATING AN ABATEMENT OF TAXES ASSESSED BY THE CITY OF DENTON. TEXAS FOR APPROPRIATE REPAIRS AND RENOVATION iii OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS IN THE DOWNTOW4 I COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF DENTON; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY. WHEREAS, Article 8, Section 1•F of the Texas Constitution and Section 11.24 of the Texas Property Tax Code enable the City of Denton to exempt from taxation part or all of the assessed value of certain historically significant sites in need of tax relief to encourage their preservation; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton finds such tax relief is needed to encourage the preservation of historic structures and sites within the Downtown Commercial District of the City of Denton; and WHEREAS, the City Council also finds that such tax relief will provide economic incentive to develop projects in historic buildings worthy of preservation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ! j CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, THAT: i SECTION 1. GRANTING OF PARTIAL EXEMPTION. Any property which is designated as a historically significant site pursuant to the terms of this chapter and which is substantially rehabilitated as provided herein shall have an assessed value for ad valorem tax purposes equal to the assessed value of the property for the tax year immediately prior to the renovation, for a period of ten (10) years following the completion of the renovation. Only the historic structure and the land reasonably necessary for access to, and use of, the structure shall be subject to the tax valuation freeze. The valuation freeze period shall begin on the first day of the tax year following A completion of the rehabilitation project. SECTION 11, DESIGNATION OF HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES. For the purpose of this Ordinance, all structures 50 years old or older which are within the boundaries of the,)owntowa Commercial District as indicated on Attachment "A" hereto, are designatm as historically signifKant sites in need of tax relief to encourage k~ their preservation. O ~1+P r w,sap. n, Jac.au.ne r. r! 32 x❑ c SECTION III. ELIGIBILITY. To be eligible for a property tax valuation freeze, a property must meet the following requirements: 1. The properly must meet the requirements for designation as a historically significant site in need of tax relief as defined in Section Two of this Ordinance. 2. The property must meet all requirements for application, certification and verification as set forth below. SECTION IV, APPLICATION PROCESS. Applications for a historic structure preservation tax exemption pursuant to this Ordinance are to be filed with the Preservation Officer of the City of Denton, who shall be the agent for the City of Denton for the purposes of administering this Ordinance. Each application shall be signed and sworn by the owner of the property and shall: A. State the legal description of the property proposed for Certification; B, Include an afPdnr• by the owner stating the structure is 50 years old or older and is located within the Downtown Commercial District; C. Include detailed plans and/or descriptions of the proposed work demonstrating rehabilitation is in accordance with the Property Appe. •aace Guidelines [set forth in Exhibit "B" hereto?]" QUESTION TO LEGAL; Do Property Appearance Guidelines have to be included as part of code if they are ari attachment in this ordinance? The Guidelines would be cumbersome to include in the coda Also, the Guidelines may be modified periodically. Could we say something such as "in accordance with the version of the Property Appearance Guidelines most recently endorsed by City Council Property Appearance Guidelines are available in the office of the Preservation Officer and in the Planning Department"? D. Include cost estimates indicating the repair or rehabilitation of the exterior of the building will equal or exceed 25% of the most recent tax valuation of the structure or $20,000, whichever is less. Roof repair or replacement may comprise no more than 50% of the minimum threshold amount necessary to qualify for tax abatement; E. Include a projection of the estimated construction time and predicted completion date of the historic repair or rehabilitation; F. Authorize the members of the Historic Landmark Commission, the City Manager or designee, and/or elected officials to visit and inspect the property proposed for Certification to verify that it is in need of substantial repair or rehabilitation and to verify repair or rehabilitation; 0. Sign an agreement to submit an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to determine compliance with Property Appearance Guidelines for any exterior modifications to the property for the duration of the period during which the tax freeze is in effect; • H. Include a tax certificate showing all taxes due upon the property have been paid; and t 1. Provide any additional information to the Historic Landmark Commission Fyn which the owner or Committee deems relevant or useful such as the history of 1 MYeRMIf mnpNthluAw~ b ,.J k 32 x R~ 1 rrrax o I O l 1 the structure, access to the structure by the public, ur any proposed changes in use of the structure. Each application shall contain sufficient documentation confirming or supporting the information submitted therein. , SECTION V. CERTIFICATION PROCESS. Upon receipt of the swom application, the Preservation Officer shall forward the application to the Historic Landmark Commission for review, The Historic Landmark Commission shall review the proposed rehabilitation for conformance with the current version of the Property Appearance Guidelines, The Historic Landmark Commission shall recommend to the City Council whether the structure shall be eligible for the tax exemption. The Commission may recommend approval of the application as submitted, approval with conditions, or denial. The written recommendation of the Historic Landmark Commission shall be delivered to the City Manager no more than thirty (45) days after submission of the application to the Preservation Officer by the applicant. Upon receipt of the recommendation of the Historic Landmark Commission, the City Manager shall within thirty (30) days place the matter upon the City Council Agenda r for determination of eligibility. In determining eligibility, the City Council shall first determine that all the requirements of this Ordinance have been met and that only the historic structure and the land reasonably necessary for access to, and use thereof is to be provided favorable tax relief as provided in Section I of this Ordinance. If eligibility is determined, the Council shall authorize the City Manager to execute a tax exemption certificate upon verification of completion. $E ,N--YL VERIFICATION PROCESS, Upon completion of the repair or rehabilitation, the Certified applicant shall submit to the Preservation Officer a swum statement of completion acknowledging that the structure j has been substantially repaired or rehabilitated in accordance with the plan approved by the Historic Landmark Commission and City Council, Applicant must also present documentation verifying that the cost of repair or rehabilitation meets or exceeds the amounts established in Section IV of this Ordinance. The Preservation Officer, upon receipt of the swom statement of completion, but no later than thirty (30) days thereafter, shall make an investigation of the property and shall approve or disapprove the fact that the property has been substantially completed as required for Certification. If the repair or renovation deviates in any way from the construction plan approved by Council, the Historic Landmark Commission shall determine whether or not the modifications are in accordance with the Property Appearance Guidelines. If verification of completion shall be deemed unfavorable, the Certified Applicant shall be required to complete or cortect the repair or rehabilitation in order to obtain the tax exemption provided by this Ordinance. If the verification of completion is favorable, the Preservation Office shall notify the City Manager in writing of compliance. Thereafter, the City Manager shall execute a tax exemption certificate and forward same to the Tax Assessor/Collector for Denton County. 1D 1 r M..ee~r~xic~a..n.m a 3.r1 ~t " 32 X a LJ o c t SECTION VII. ALTERATION OR DESTRUCTION, If the Preservation Officer or a member of the Historic Landmark Commission has reason to believe that an exempted structure has been altered or totally or partially destroyed by the willful act or negligence of the owner or his representative, the Preservation Officer shall immediately cause the matter to be scheduled for the earliest possible consideration by the City Council, If, after giving notice and hearing to the owner, the City Council determines that the exempted structure has been totally or partially destroyed or altered by the willful act or negligence of the owner or his representative, the owner shall immediately repay to the City all of the tax revenues that were not paid because of the exemption plus interest calculated at an annual rate of six percent (6%). Where an exempted structure is totally or partially destroyed or altered by other than the willful act or negligence of the owner or his representative, the owner shall, within thirty (30) days, request a demolition permit when repair is not feasible, or request a building permit to reconstruct the historically significant site in accordance with the Property Appearance Guidelines ( Attachment "B" 7)l the development codes of the r City of Denton and the approved plans for that structure. Renovation is hereby deemed feasible when destruction or alteration is fifty percent (30%) or less of the structural value of the building. In cases where a demolition permit is issued by the City because renovation is not feasible, repayment of tax revenue is not required 11 SECTION VIII. TRANSFERABILITY TO FUTURE OWNER(S). f NOTE TO LEGAL: IF POSSIBLE, WE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THIS TRANSFERABLE TO NEW OWNERS DURING THE TEN YEAR PERIOD. PERHAPS NEW OWNERS COULD NOTIFY US OF THEIR PURCHASE OF TAB PROPERTY AND SIGN AN AGREEMENT TO HAVE ALTERATIONS TO Tit STRUCTURE, INCLUDING SIGNAGE, REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE W)ItH i, PROPERTY APPEARANCE GUIDELINES. SECTION IX. USE IN CONJUCTION WITH OTHER TAX INCENTIVES. At the discretion of City Council, the tax freeze provided in this ordinince rniy liIin conjunction with tax abatements for Historic Landmark zoning as provided iq',..'cle3 of the Denton City Code. The applicant must meet all requirements for eAcKtax O abatement separately in order to be considered for both abatements. This tax freeze maybe used in conjunction with other types of sbaleA6U ihit gybe developed in the future, unless otherwise prohibited by statute or by ordinance. SECTION, SEVERABILITY. o The provisions of this Ordinance are severable. If any provisions of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person orcircumstances shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remainder of this Ordinance shall nevertheless be valid, 1'd~rddepmmtlQMArM~w b ~J 0 e~ el Ir, 1, '1 Ir 1~ ti 0.d YY 0 ' Y i v♦ t 1 r,' t^p y , , y 1 s ,i E^ 'i K4 fv.IS/ I,TY. Y~'R156W.. v ' 1 SECTION ELEVEN. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon the passage of ten (10) days or upon publication of its caption, whichever is sooner. r ° . PASSED AND APPROVED THS DAY OF 11998. , CITY OF DENTON , By: Jack Miller Mayor ATTEST: F Jennifer Walters pity Secretary f 1 I II I' L iI 1 1 ~'e f, 1 ' 1 I Y r ie r 10 3'2 0 1 • w s~ r.. Downtown Commercial District 1 r.+n .Y .4 k% ~ Y 1 JIM r DD w wr 00 1 -MAN e E~ In M, 1 i ISM Attnclimont. A 9 rr r 1 "rr t Y,..1 32x 0 " % . . I Summary of common historic preservation incentives Type of Incentive Exampletexplanation Pros Cons Partial or full tax exemption Portion of city taxes (e.g. 50%) on Encourages substantial Only applies to expensive rehab land and structure are exempted renovations. Review process projects. No incentives or reviews for fora specified period (usually 10 encourages quality rehab, smaller projects, years) when renovation exceeds X% of assessed tax role improvement value Tax freeze Taxes are "frozen" at pre- No loss of current revenue to city. Less tangible or predictable benefit to renovation level, usually for ten Assures owner that taxes will not owner than an exemption; therefore, years, increase on substantial rehab for program gets used less. 10 year period. Low interest loans (private sector) Loans for rehab offered at below Little or no expense to city Requires coordination of public and prime. Usually reviewed for government. Can be any size private sector program. Flas to be f appropriateness by design project, renegotiated or renewed more frequently committee and reviewed for than a tax abatement ordinance. Only credit-worthiness by lender. participating lenders are included. Usually voluntary private-actor Design review can be circumvented by participation, or city can offer banks' "good customers." May not offer guarantee or 'buy-dawn"" enough cost savings to insure use of o m. Revolving loan fund Low interest fours fir rehab Appealing incentive to many Competes with privale-sector lenders. I ' offered through a rev wing loan building owners. Can be used for Probably very labor-intensive to fund, large or small projects. administer. Limited to available funds at any given time. May or may not offer enough savings to insure use of prostrom. l Matching grants Grants offered for quality rehab Could include large or small Not sure if this can be done from city's projects, projects. Very enticing incentive; general fund (may require CDHG "cash in hand". funding). Requires cash outlay from city. Maybe more controversial from businesses in other parts of town. - ~5.10 32xI❑ MIA 51 • .I • I AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET .tpeude No, 4penda ltem~~`' Date ? z~ AGENDA DATE: April 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT: Planning Department DUM: Rick Svchla. 349-7715 SUBJECT - Annexation Report. Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give direction to staff with regard to the proposed annexation of two tracts of land and a request to release land from the City of Denton Extra- Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). A. Oakmont 11. Approximately 1.6 acres annexation and 2.1 acres disannexation near State School Road and Robinson Road. The areas are part of a single-family residential subdivision. B. The Preserve at Pecan Creek. Approximately 13 acres near Edwards Road. This property will provide secondary access to a proposed mixed-use, mixed-housing community. Townhome development is proposed in this particular area. C. Release of ETJ. An area near Bartonville, south of FM 407. A single-family subdivision is proposed. The applicants have expressed a desire to connect to Bartonville utilities. J3ACKGROUNll Over the past several months representatives of two properties currently located in the City's ETJ have discussed with staff the possible annexation ortheir property into the City. In additiin, one property representative has requested the release of land from the City's ET). The two proposed annexations: I. Oakmont It. Approximately 1.6 acres annexatlon and 2.1 acres disannexation near State School Road and Robinson Road. The areas are part of a single-family subdivision. 2. The Preserve. Approximately 13 acres near Edwards Road. This property will provide ' secondary access to a proposed mixed-residence community. Townhome development is • proposed in this particular area of the development. T he proposed release of ETJ: I • Zcna Development Corporation. An area near Bartonville, south of FM 407. A single. family subdivision is proposed. The applicants have expressed a desire to connect to • Brrtonvilic utilities. O • Oakmont 11. This property is located in southeast Denton, west of State School Road and north of Robinson Road, and straddles the Denton - Corinth city boundary. The property was rezoned from PD-117 to SF-7(c) in June, 1996, The concept or a land swap between Denton and Corinth was presented at that time, Now, the applicants would like to move forward with the proposed annexation and disannexation with Corinth. ` I f 1(. Ir:e nrrr mr if R.p, n'lur,+nbnu Nr 1,+i,lY:dlf f7rh dr 1 I y ~ I _i r ~ " a = Ta Ff r ~ ~ 9 S a , , , , a tr yI ~ Pr µ ~ ~ P: I h , a f . 4 r ' 1 ,r d r~ r e. d tV I o'' r '1'• -.r a r r y c f r r' r ::IOfFill~ r ~ y , n A preliminary plat for a portion of the property entirely within the City of Denton (Oakniort 11, Section 1) was approved in November, 1996, and the appla.ants have are in the process of finalizing that final plat. This property is unaffected by the proposed annexation/disannexation. i The proposed annexation/di.sannexation is necessary to prepare for development of subsequent sections. The current city boundary bisects several lots within proposed layout of the subdivision. The proposed city boundary follows lot lines, allows for the provision of wastewater service from the appropriate city, clarifies the responsibility for street maintenance, and provides for clearer addressing within the subdivision. See attachment 2. The proposed annexation/disarmexation would shill 1.552 acres from Corinth to Denton and 2 107 acres from Denton to Corinth. The Preserve. This property is located in southeast Denton, north and east of 1-35E near the Shady Shores exit. It is bordered by the City of Shady Shores on the east. The property was zoned as PD-132 in 1988. It is part of a former PD 88 that was created in 1984. A mixed-use, mixed housing development is proposed. The owners have applied for approval of a Developrr.cm Plan for the property. The concept of an annexation of a small area to provide secondary access to the development was presented at that time. The applicants would like to move forward with the proposed annexation concurrently with Development Plan approval. A preliminary plat for a portion of the property entirely within the City of Denton (Oakmont 11, Section 1) was approved in November, 1996, and the applicants have are in the process of finalizing that final plat. This property is unaffected by the proposed arr.eration/disannexation. Requested Release from Denton ETJ Zcna. Development Corporation has requested that land within the ETJ of Denton be released so that it can be annexed into tl:'e Town of Bartonville. Staff has requested additional information. 't'here has been no response. Staff seeks direction with regard to these arriexationv, particularly City Council willingness to swap land with Corinth as proposed, annex land in the area of Edwards Road, and to release land from its ETJ in the Bartonviile - Argyle area, PRIOR AC [ON I REV LW (Council, Boards, Commission There has been no prior notion or review of these proposals by other Boards or Commissions. FISCAL INFORNIATION I At this time, there has been no fiscal analysis prcpar,:d: ror all annexations a Scrvice Plan and Annexation Study are required: AT'T'ACHMENTS 1. Location Map - Oakmont 11 and Proses O 2. Annexation Exhibit Oakmont Il 3. Preliminary Plan for The Preserve at Pecan Creek 4. Location Map - Request to Release ET1 5. Correspondence packet - Zcna Development Corporation ! 1l lrn m"!ri f 1? 11",..rl rt,&,~ i lip '4 2, t } ?-5 32 X10 LALUMA " J `r n••; 4 ~il r n , n1 'i i~^F f 1 ~ n n , ~~,~Rw ! u° r rf I 3 i v y~ ~ i.rr lr, F I i . a' r` lox~ l J r I Respectfully submitted: i Da ' ill Director of Planning and Development Prepare! by: Mark Donaldson Assistant Director, Planning and Development 1 . a' ~17" S 1'41 f Vi lJ„~~rmlrt !!.i hl+,., an ie Wpi.r,.iN rl llJ)F 3.~ + t , , x 32 X' ~ ~f I,f t ~ I r ~y 1 11 1 1n-. f I ~ A' f 1 I u i f 1 ~ , E. \ a r } I 4 h ii '.li ~v +r r .n n.. _ •.w. s... r. ne..n n~. ~ a r • v 1' ATTACHMENT 1 LOCATION MAP PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS i ~ I THE PRESERVE f OAKNIONT II 4. T'£t~vG~ ,i dF • x; 10 r ti. ~ f Ir I r f ~ ~l 1 ;s, x, I + f t'I: r n~ ~ r } + ,1 I + 1 r, I 1 f f M1 iy e 1 ,r r+ r ` . 1 V f V. ~ ~ r F Ir I~ 1. ' I. ~ ~ 5 ' • r Y r, ~ f • 7 t n 1 r ~ IAA i ATTACHMENT 2 ANNEXATION EXHIBIT _ OAKNIONT II `Ab 11 , sf T ~ ~ F A 1 : I Qk` I 1 1 1 O Y I r i 1 I 1 l I~~- ~ j I - i I I I 1 I 111++I 1I IJ+II l1 I ~ I' , jj I r ICI ~ Irf ~`'LL _~~I~ ~I~~ ~ i~~ f i ~ r i~I r I I I - I i J1 . 8... r. I 1 , I I o I 10 32 x 1 G • IFtMiJA ATTACHMENT 3 PRELIMINARY PLAN THE PRESERVE AT PECAN CREEK a 1 k ~ ,~t ~ !I;I . i II G _ R llllllifill I ;~iiiiriti i ti7a: i i , ~ a a r 10 a.ee ,er♦ ,ne eao. O 31 r W z W. w F CL W z F' ~I I LL I ((yy n max, y )i l_I ;32 X I LJ NEON _ ti • I a i ~ ' 1 r~. ' 1 R 3 ~1 t 1 f 1 1 f l I li ~I ~d i ~,1 r I Iy I • is ATTACHMENT 4 LOCATION MAP REQUEST TO RELEASE ETJ • I 574 R 1 _S c f?,, DENT( c MOMM' Wl )N _wlko -I •__-__/JN ~l~___-1I M~ r~ -tel. , I ~ - ARGYLE • r l`'IFIDL. ~hlrwipie.N~__I ~ 1 4R 111111 'AREA OF REQUEST 1 FM 401 -J ANYON- "T"k "Vi !I BARTOE 7. 1 ~ 75 32XIO w MOW= , O Awsq ft ATTACHMENT 5 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ClTYHAt1. WEST 221 N. ELM DENTON, TEXAS 76201 f817)566-8200 DFW METRO 434.2529 January 28, 1998 Ms, Vicky Gaddy, Construction Coordinator Zena Development Corporation P.O. Box 92884 Southlake, TX 76092 Subject: Deer Creek Estates Bartonville, Texas Dear Ms. Gaddy: I am in recelpt of your letter requesting direction regarding the release of land from the City of Denton Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Attached was a letter from the City of Bartonville expressing an interest in annexing the property, and a metes and bounds description of the property in question. To take this forward to the City Council of Denton, it is necessary to provide: a A map of the property and its surrounding area, which clearly shows the current City boundaries of Bartonville and Argyle, and the ETJs of Argyle, Bartonville, and Denton. • A letter from the City of Argyle that acknowledges their agreement with the proposed annexation of the subject property to the City of Bartonvtlle. If you have any questions or need additional Information, please feel free to contact me at (940) 349-8350, Si ,errre-lly,, Mark Donaldson . Assistant Director, Planning and Development Q ' c: Dave Hill, Director a. "Dedleal d 10 Quality Snrl[e" x 10 32x IO 01, e i e/IIII!!I~ ~ .i ~ ~1 V' q f _ ! I .1. i 1 , 10NA CORPORATION January 13, 199 Mr. Mark Donelson CITY OF DFNTON Planning Department 221 N. Elm Street Denton, Texas 76201 RE: Deer Creek Estates Bartonville, Texas Dear Mr. Donelson: Per our previous conversation, on December 9, 1997 we tiled an Annexation Petition with the Town of Barlonvilic for the parcel of land described in the attached Exhibit A. We have Keen advised by the Town of Bartonville that this particular land is currently located within the Extra Territorial Jurisdiction of the City of Denton and they have suggested that we apply with the City for a release of this land to the Town of Bartomille. ' For your use, we have included copies of all previous correspondence with the Town of Bartonville. Please let us know how we should proceed from this point with the city of Denton. Sin/cer~,ly, Vicky Gaddy ` Construction Coordinator • Is, Enclosures • r Vol 9. P. O. Boa 92864, Southiake, Tem. 76091 102 W. Worth, Suite 200, Grapevine, Texas 76051 Metro (8 17) 424-1292 Fu (817) 421.6910 1 ~5 x 32XIII e f tr.. .t1t991f r. 0 j 15iS0 6 t A C1'S-P-TAP41.. IHr. - e17 cif E9:0 X2 EXHIBIT A ZONING EXHIBIT 030 ACRES Being all that certain lot, tract or parcel of lend situat6d in the William Blalock Survey, Abstract Number 44, Daniel Cook Survey, Abstract Number 230, A.R. Loving Survey, Abstract Number 736, Sam Liunby Survey, Abstract Number 767 and John Gib:rons Survey, Abstract Number 169% T -jwn of Bartonville, Denton County, Texts and being all thou certain cuts of land described in deed to The Wilkerson Children's Trust No. Three recorded is Volume 2350, Page 894, William Wilkerson, being a callod 2132 sore tract of land recorded in Volume 1736, Pats 753, William Wilkerson, Tract (1) One, being a called 74.995 acre tract of land recorded in Volume 2032, Page 629, Crate, Wilkerson Trutt, being stalled 47.877 am tract of land, recorded In Volume 2368, Pages 966, Craig Wilkerson Trust, being a called 60.000 acre tract of land recorded in Volume 2388, Page 994, Craig Wilkerson A Damon Wilkerson Trust, being a called 21.472 we tract of land, recorded in Volume 2388, Page 998, William Wilkerson, being a i called 4.9967 acre tract of land, recorded in Volume 1541, Page 919, William Witkatort rcwtded in Volume 2052, Page 633 sad William Craig Wilkerson recorded in County Clerk's File No. 9&050884 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texts sad being more particularly 1 descn'bed as follows: BEGONING at the nortbeast corner of the said Wilkerson Children's Trust No. Three tract, said comer being the southeast comer of the H .M. Pitner, Second Tract recorded is Volume 418, Page 734 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texu and being a point In the westerly right- of-%%a) of Foal Market Road No. 407; THENCE Southerly along the easwly line of said Wilkerson Children's Trust No. Three tract and the westerly right-of-way of Farm to Market Road No. 407 to the southeast comer of the said Wilkerson Children's Trust No. Three tract and the North" corner of %be Saa-A-R sy Co. tract recorded in Volume 65S, Page S93 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; I TEIENCE Westerly along the north tine of said San-A-Ray cut and the south line of acid Wilkerson Children's Trust No. Three to the northeast comer of said 2.132 sere tract; THF,NCE Southerly along the cut line of the called 2.732 we tract to the southeast comer thereof on the south tine of said San•A•Ray tract and the north line of that certain Pones City inn, Inc. tract recorded in County Clerk's File No, 97.001408 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texu; THESE CE Wentrly along the south line of the called 2.732 acre tractand the north line of said Ponca City Inn tract being in the east line of uld William Wilkerson tract; THENCE Southerly along the west line of the said Pones City Ian tract to the soutbeast oomerr cf said 14.398 acre tract and the eoMust comer of that to taro Decoy Investment tract dated 7- $48; 4 THEKE Westerly slony the south tine of said 14.598 acre tract and the south line of sold 10. y ,wt4 7 v. 3 Z x E j I . r 3 i C 1 1 I 4 1 es a . I I r :i/ID/?7 5: SS S L R CDtiSJ_T;r47SI Ire. 617 21 ES:0 X3 i 74.995 acre tract to the sombwest comer thereof and the nortbwegt comer of the said Decoct I intestments trot and being on the cast line of the W.H. Seal tract worded in Volume 409, Page 31 of the Deed Records of Denton Couny, Texas; y THENCE NonLrly along the west line of the gild 74.993 acre tract to a point; THENCE Westerly to the westerly southwest comer of said 74,995 acre tract; THENCE Northerly to the south line of Lot 6 Tucker Addition, an addition to the Town of Banontille, Denton County, Texas, recorded in Cabinet E, Page 138 of the Plat Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE Easterly along the south line rf mid Lot 6 and Lot 7 to the southerly southeast comer thereof to a point for comer, THENCE Northerly to the northwest corner of called 74.995 am tract; THENCE Easterly along the south line of mud Lot 7 and 8 and the north line of said 74.995 acre tract to the notheast corner thereof said point being southeast comer of Lot 8, of gild Tucker Addition; THENCE Northerly along the east line of said Lot 8 to northeast corner thereof and the southeast corner of mud 60.000 acre tract; THENCE Westerly along the south line of the said 60.000 acre tract and the north fiat of said Lot I and the conk line of Dote Creek Road io the southwest comer of said 47.617 acre tract; THENCE Northerly along the east at of Dote Creek Road and the wen at of the called 47,677 acre tract to the southeast comer of the called 21,472 acre tract; THENCE Northwesterly along the north line of Dove Creek Road and the south line of said 21.472 acre tract to the southwest corner thereof; THEN'CE'r'ortberly Mons the west line of the tailed 21.412 acre tract and the apputent city limits of the City of Argyle, Texas, to the a point for comer, said point being at the apparent city limits of the Toan of Bartonville, Texu; THENCE Easterly along the said limits of Bwomilie to a point in %be vest line of the said Wilkerson Children's Trust No, Three trot; THENCE Northerly along the said limits of Butonviile and the west line of said Wilkerson Children's Trust No. Three tract to the northwest corner thereof; THENCE Easterly along the north floe of the said Wilkencn Children's Trust No. Three to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containia8 approximately 330 acre, more or less. • 10 11. K 2!~ C~ 32;x 4 ~ 4 4 Y a M u . AWN" ; l TOWN OF BARTONVILLE ANNEXATION PETITION (TLGC 143.028) TO THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF BARTONVILLE, { TEXAS: 1, the undersigned owner of the hereinafter described tract of land, which is vacant or on which less than three (3) qualified voters reside, petition the Town of Bartonville, Denton County, Texas, pursuant to Texas Local Government Code 143.028, to extend the present Town linuts so as to include as a part of the Town of Bartopville, Texas, the following described territory, to-writ: See Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof. I certify that the above-described tract of land is contiguous and adjacent to the ` Town of Bartonville, Texas and that it is less than one-half (1/2) mile In width. Zena D 1 pment Corp atlon :gaa e C. Pat DiFonzo, President Printed Name STATE OF TEXAS 4 4 COUNTY OF DENTON BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name 1 is subscribed tote orego:ng strument and he/she acknowledged to me that he/she • executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN under my hand and seal of office, this day of , ,u 19_ ! • Notary Public of and for • • The State of Texas 12. ANNEXATION PETITION • Page 1 bv%annexpet '25 10' 3:2 X I :i y~r ~ t y P..' et.)i•I Ip Y FYI. iR r Vl III 4 t ~yW A e^~ I` y v r" , 1 E a 5 y % % n y « J • v r ~ 1 I 11 L r . 0 y n I 1 t l r I l, , "41 t n.'.1 ,t,4 ..w a..., ...a....w1r~u wn. r. ..+ri..1. r. i.M. v t ECEIVED QQ DEC 2 21997 U~RTMMLLE r _ IBI December 18, 1997 Zena Development Corporation Mr, Pat Dironr.o President P.O. Box 92W Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Mr. DiForuo: We are in receipt of your Annexation Petition regarding the properties owned by Dr, , William Wilkerson and located outside the Bartonville Town limits. The Town of Bartonville is interested in annexing the land, however, it has been discovered that the properties in question are currently located within the Extra Territorial Jurisdiction of the City of Denton. We suggest that you contact the City of Denton and request a release of the land to the Town of BartonvMe. We look forward to working with you regarding the above. Sincerely, .tees ✓1+1' ' Annemarie Moore Town Secretary r, 1941 E.1e1rt Road, Bsrtom Ile, Texas 76226 (817)430-4052 I ~ b rV~ 32x10 Y ~ v ' 1 1 n a' ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 I• i r t r , n r t r / gyp, Agenda No AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET Agenda Item Cate. AGENDA DATE-. April 14, 1998 DEPARTMENT-. Solid Waste ACM-. Howard Martin, Assistant City Manager/Utilities' SUBJECT Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the 1998.1999 Solid Waste holiday disposal e schedule. BACKGROUNDISUMMARY This schedule deals primarily with the residential collection schedule. Up until a few years ago the Residential Division took most of the holidays listed on the proposed holiday schedule which is enclosed. For the last four or five years the residential employees have worked all holidays, with the exception of three days per year. These employees have observed one day at Thanksgiving, one day at Christmas, and one day on New Year. Most other city empluyees receive 9 holidays per year, The Solid Waste Mpartment is proposing a residential collection schedule that would allow our residential employees to observe 7 holidays per year. The schedule would provide for the same holidays as orr other employees with the exception of the day after Thanksgiving and Christmas Eve. The department proposer. to implement this residential collection schedule beginning with the Memorial Day holiday. The Commercial and Landfill divisions of Solid Waste are proposing no change and will be off only on Thanksgiving day and Christmas day to be in tune with businesses which need service, LRII RACTION/RF'VIEW(CouncilBoards Commissions) The Public Utilities Board voted unanimously (5.0) to approve the Solid Waste Holiday Schedule at their February 16, 1998 meeting. FISCAL INFORMATION 'Ibis will save approximately $7,000 per year. Re, tfully submitted, r i r O Charles S, Watkins, Director Solid Waste Department AllachmemaL Proposed 1496.99R"1dcntialttolidgScheJule P2- Mi tute5 from the rehruary 16^, 1996 Public Utilities Road Meeting -AW 7h x 10 32x10 JjLjjqKj~~mj&~~ ME Mamma 1 Q tl j. c. t e ,wrw T 'IT I PROPOSED HOLIDAY SCHEDULE RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE NEW YEAR'S DAY Friday, Jan. 1 1999 Closed Thurs. route on Wed. Fri. route on Thurs. SILK DAY Monday, Jan. 18 1999 Closed Mon, route on Tues. Tues. route on Wed. MEMORIAI JAY Monday, May 25 1998 Closed Mon. route on Tues. Tues. route on Wed. 4"" OF JULY (Observed) Friday, July 31998 Closed Thurs. route on Wed. FrL route on Thurs. LABOR DAY Monday, Sept. 7 1998 Closed Mon. route on Tues. Tues, route on Wed. THANKSGIVING DAY Thursday, Nov. 26 1996 Closed There. route on Wed. D DAY AFTER Friday, Nov. 27 1998 Work r, CHRISTMAS EVE Thursday, Dec. 24 1998 Work CHRISTMAS DAY Friday, Dec. 25 1998 Closed Thurs. route on Wed. F ri. route on Thurs. ATTACHMENT I 1110 3 2 % aaaafa9Rf~ ~ f , ~ f ~ t f w h1 ~ Y 1. ,;r ' v , .14 r . 1 r fl r .r.,♦ Jb u. n.A4/ft fy ..ru ..ur .r s. r .3 FrMO VNnt4xJvLrrM'M Yf. ....r~..~ ~ , i AGENDA ITEM b: CONSIDER AND APPROVE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL HOLIDAY SCHEDULE Charlie Watkins, Superintendent of Solid Waste, asked the Board to approve a collection and disposal holiday schedule fa residential Solid Waste employees beginning May 25,1498, during the observance of Memorial Day. Mr. Watkins informed the Board that for the lost four or five years these employees have worked all holidays (with the exception of one day at Tbatsksgiving, Christmas and New Years) while most City employees received nine holidays per year. He proposed that Solid Waste employees receive the same holidays as other employees i.e. Martin Luther King Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. The exception would be the day after Thanksgiving and Christmas Eve- those routes will remain unchanged. Mr. Watkins explained that the Commercial and Landfill divisions of Solid Waste are not included in this proposal because of the continued effort to address the identified needs of the business community; therefore those employees will continue to receive two holidays, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. TTre Public Utilities Board voted unanimously to approve the proposed Solid Waste collection and disposal holiday schedule for residential employees after a motion by Board Member Dick Norton and second by Board Member Charldean Newell i 1 )it 4 4 Y t J~o 3 ATTACHMENT 2 32 X I O . lqlsommmmw~ . ti 0 Agenda No _ Agenda Item Date " AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: April 14",1998 DF,PARTMENT: Planning & Development DCM: Rick Svebla, 3497715 i S E Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding growth forecasts. BA GROUND The Denton Plan Process includes a stage in the process devoted to projections of population growth and land use demand. This stage also entails an evaluation of the fiscal impacts that would be envisioned in providing public services to new residents and previously undeveloped and. RUST Environment and Infras'ructure is the lead firm, and is handling the preparation and presentation of the grow'!, forecasts. The first presr station to City Council was made at the March 24'h, 1998 Wc,k Session, which evaluated future growth prospects and influences for the ` city as a whol;. i A second presentation has been scheduled for April 10, 1999 to provide insight into future "sub-area" growth, breaking the city into smaller statistical areas as described during the last work session. An outline that highlights the major points of the forthcoming presentation will be delivered to City Council member on Monday, April 13,h,1998. The forecasts will provide support for two major activities: (l) the continuation of the consultant work will lead to the development of a "preferred development scenario" that mill assist in the formulation of the comprehensive plan, particularly with respect to the growth management strategy, and 1 (2) the forecasts will be used by the recently appointed Advisory Committee to produce land use assumptions required to calculate development impact fees. I CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE The project schedule includes four major components: #lA Forecasts City Council Work Session March 1998 41D "Sub-Area" Forecasts City Council Work Session: April 11998 02 Alternative Development Scenarios City Council Work Session: April 28'h, 1998 #3 Public Review & Comment May 1998 Public Meetings i i #4 Preferred Development Scenario City Council Work Session August I lih, 1998 4 • 1 32X10 % • I ~ I R 1 r 1 ~ I • \ 1 r Y - r . r 1 2 i rf t t ~ n v 0 l' Y~ k • J :rte • Capital Improvements Advisory Committee Scheduler The use of the forecasts for the development of impact fee land use assumptions will be completed by the advisory committee on k r April 22nd, 1998, when committee recommendations are forwarded to City Council for adoption. As its initial task, the Advisory Committee will be asked to review information provided by consultants during a series of three meetings to recommend land tse assumptions to City Council. An estimated ;lreakdown of discussion topics is as follows: #l Forecasts March 25",1998 02 Land Use Demand April B", 1998 #3 Land Use Assumptions Recommendations Apri122nd,1998 i I PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW The Denton City Council instructed staff to develop a schedule to integrate The Denton Plan with the implementation of development impact fees. The Department of Planning and Development and the Department of Water/Wastewater have been working since November 1997 to prepare Requests for Proposals, review consultant proposals, and select consultant teams to coordinate all necessary activities. Two firms, RUST Environment & infrastructure (RUST), and Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, Inc. (HOK), were selected as the consultant team for the pro~ect. The RUST / HOK contract for this project was approved by City Council on February 17 '1998, The scope of services for forecasting and land use planning consultant services is intended to ' assist community decision-making with respect to future growth by accomplishing the following tasks: 1. Determine the City's build-out capacity 2. Forecast population growth 3. Forecast land use demand for different density patterns 4. Prepare alternative development scenarios 5. Allow time for public review and comment on scenarios 6. Prepare preferred development scenario for comprehensive plan guidance .1 i EXHIBIT Copies of the presentation outline will be hand-delivered to City Council members on Monday, • April 13", 1998. i Respectfully Submitted: avid M. Hill R Director of Planning and Development i 2 r , • Vann= i o ~ • LIL 00. 0+ • • • i • m cD (n l ! ( co • • e ~ o • %,r - ~ )k-) 32 x L 1, 1, 7P " c Y • . a r 1 Y' f Y ~ I r ~ 'I 1 ~ I • L'` r a a r Y v i ~ z . ,'a i n a ,'f. a ( t~ t L a y, 1 "'I j lid b l V r . 4 1 rM1 ,r. , .i , ,t•I i • 3 { r ~ r Briefing Content r ♦ Review Of Donlon Historical Da • Discussion Of Forecasting Me odology • Revisit Some Forecasts For Met opiex ♦ Population Estimates for The CI r- ♦ Subarea Estimates • Historical Population of Area Cities r ~i r i> City-of-Dent©n-Population a-- (Bureau the Census) +0.00 70,000 60,000 50,000 1.00% • ~ r y a 40,000 1,00% D.00% ~ t c 50,000 4.00% ! d', D 20A00 3.00% 2.00% 10,000 1.00% 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 MO 1960 1970 19,0.\ 90 - Yoe r *p „ d. y9j.~rr,,w11^ 1 111- 25 V10 32X y v ~ n] r R~. , e i 0 .d 9t.- y' r' f Y i is Y yY` k ''1~ 1 ' Y 1 r l , i r State Data Center Population Estima 'a 76,000 3.00° 7/000 - 2.30°h - 72,900 ° c 70,000 2.007° ~ 68,000 • • ° 1.60% 66,000 • 1,00°h 64,000 0.30°h y a 62,000 • e,r 60,000 0,00% 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 199 997 \ i NCTC00 Population Estimates! 72,000 .00°h _ 71,000 / .007. 70,000 _ oo°h „ 69,000 .00% a 68,000 1.00% -°n 67,000 2.00% ~ 66,000 65,000 .00% 1 64,000 5.00v° 63,000 00 ~ °i. r 1990199119921993199/1AA31996199T~ ~ - ~ ~ * 2 I 14 1~?5 A ❑ 32x~ i . i . 0 , ; 1 ` a r Population Forecasting Met dol gy + N•t2 Pt2 = Ptl + Bt1-t2 - D t P,2= Population At Futur Tlme B,1,2= Broths Between l1 d t2 D _ tta:= Deaths Between ~l8 ~ M,,.,2= Migration Betwe n t1 a lit I State Data Center Scenarios ♦ Base Migration Rate Is 198 to 1990 ♦ 0.0 - No Migration ♦ 0.5 • Rate Is 1/2 Of The 80.9 Rate ♦ 1.0 • Rate Is Equal To The 80- 0 Rat • 1.25 • Rate lei 1.26 Times The I 90 ate 3 k a 32XI❑ w. i I fad _ .r e , (a r t Y_ r. r , Texas Water Development Bo d Scenarios • Base Migration Rate Is 198 to 1990 ♦ M_00 - No Migratlofl~, • M_06 - Rate Is 112 Of The 8190 Rate • M_10 - Rate Is Equal To The 0.90 R to _ • M ML - Is The Most Likely at 1 Metroptex Population foreca OLD/ 12,000,000 _ _ , 10,000,000 A 8,000,000 a 8,000,000 0 4,000,000 -b-8 snarlo 0.0 2,000,000 aarlo 0.6 1 ~-6t !Ha 4.0 w , 1690 04 1990 2000 2010 _ 202 -2030 _.l r.u r 1 4 I I ' 9 f{ 5 1 ~ l I ~ ` f r ~ 7y. ~"5 "1 ~ I ~ 1 f S 1 pew f' 1 1:~. }r 1 .a } "J . 1 1 M ~ • t 1 M I ~ 1 . Y f , ! IR Y . J Y~ I° a 4 i i ~ 4 r 5 1 1 ti r 1 " 1 { 3 1 Y I ^R > r _ a C a ~ r r A J I a ~ I _ s ..1 a I 1 k 5 , I, .r f 1} 5 .A 1 1:' ~ k r ...~AS:v :m`WVa Nry+~AtwrM+i 4i~i.. • ..~.....~w:......2......,. ~.2.v . 1 • t r~ Annualized Percent Population Incre r 00-Area - - r a 3.00% r Y 2.00% 1. t 1 4 1.60' 1.00% s o.oo e s o.eo 0.60% .o-s 1.00 0.00% + s oo•N ,990 2000 2010 L--- - 200 Ynr - - ~ M l State Data Ceriterforecaats FO U } Looa.ooa ' Looa,eoo . y. +o0 1 i ai aAoo,ooa ..K2 i ~ teoe,ooa ~ ooo,ooo L, we,eoo ` 1in@ 30" wfa 10111 1034 -row 1949 o ,f l `W 1+ n 5 r I i C 1 ^ Y" f ~ I ? I L I• a `•R C~ It j. ~ I yr ..r , I' I I w r.l ~ r , l I 1 LI , 1 w j ~ ~ c . t i c ~ l ` t O z I I ( r' ~ e r r r i i v G 360,000 -Stem arlo M00 ~ Seen sno M 10 260,000 S"morlo MML 0 200,000 160,000 100,000 .r 60,000 0 1000 2000 2020 2040 20 0 Dots from Donal Wm ho News • Feb. 1, 1"1 Metropiex Apartment atio i _ . ---city - _Ap~__ -44 Arlington 39 Dallas 60 Donlon 45 Euless 41 Girland \26 Grand Prairie Irving 43 Plano 27 e e ti K*. 25 x 10 32XIO t w~ a: ~ftk +r:r-•• a t~'rF l~yt b r ~r°'~ V4 r~I,~~t~~~ 1fi ,',y jr, ;u',r ~~(*r a% .5 ` ~t rr~ey t tiir~tiY~}SR~~ifr •4,; ~i~r v r r N~ ~ a a Y . { 1 v 0 c r + ! J + Iii r I r ! S A 1 -a i y r ~ - r , r 1 r ti ' a q r: NI r 4 t : r { ~.t , .r . ~ all Unit Cost For Undeveloped, Re den 11011 L d Location Cost •rAcrn City of Denton $17.18,000 Denton county $8.20,000 Alton $401-60,000 Frisco $20• ,000 ` West Plano $$660-60,00---- - 8outhiske $2640,000 McKinney 926,000 Study Sub-area Forecast by NCTC d , ~ I I 8ubini T1990 2010 020 1 62 86 1 17 7 7 e j' 2 - -e4e 420 2 4e _ 4,6X 1 o,9x i 3 20,127 1,e67 2 ,400 12 % 1 ,2X i 4 101394 14 - -1 , - _ 5111 6 .155 + 8 21,304 1t 1Si ,2X__ 7 ~i SACC I,,,,2 10 A •'.r 7~a^a r 4 M_tin P+°Pyi 1h o s' 1 +A + I ~ i + I rn f~ r ~ + ®Y ~1 J 0 J t f L +J R I J 1 Y n f ~ ,yl . 4Y.:p S.v M'aK Wra it +H s.. r - ` I I'. a._ +.rnu~wn'•.n u.~. ~ F „ ' J , i ds Study Sub-area Forecasts y N C s - ---8ubume 19A0 --010 ----1 20 - 8 11,612 7,430 ZO990 ! 62 ,555 9,183 7 4,810 j 7Ax 50 .6% 6 784 9 1 3,417 27, x 32 .0% [n', 9 624 94Q _ --2' !0-- _ 16.1 25 .8% 10 1,413 4,992 of 11:PFi 1 Study Sub A 3X_ b N TC G - - -area Forecast y Subnna 1990 010 020 $ 11 140 ,190 3 94 12 2,274 1491 S 72 .6x 1 Ax 1S 1,153 856 3 22 11.3% Z 4.9% l,Oyy 12 077 14 4,240 113:b'S 15 3,061 411.0% 1_83bA% - 't r 32X _ i a 0. r 1af~~< 1~ , , n F~ r, rt F 9'~ y L F F } ti t rt , J..' i F~h ~ ~Tf it r yr 1 7, t ~ 1R ~F .fi f'~ 6a 1 rl at 5j, i t`^ t 11ti ":~.+r i~'fN 1 i~ er w ~J n w, n v~'~ r J ~ j T J~ 1 ~ 'ti 1 4 . , s F ~T> a , y t , q. a , Lx , A , ~ trx f T f r d , ~ ~ r'. f ~ ,i d y k 1 .1 i 1 a ' 1 t i . r ~ yr t 5r yA 4 'k l e ~ , y ~ Y 1 r` ,...C~bw~u>'a nrh,kwC.ray..u.,......,wi ,n t"'__~~~.. ~ t, f Y'i_~u."F~.~:..a:+',ww•rw.~..{e.r.ClS.......,;.v _~a~.. ~ ~e F.. "zz Study Area Summary 1990 2010 2 20 84,009 127,800 186 384 2.4% 8% , „t Population Data for ArNngton, Taal IN.NI i _ t "I all r'tl f _ I I".NI r MIIM IN M on ' f r. f 1 t y NN 1114 1114 YN to two IN1 1114 NN MO Year w ~ 1 VV~~ r 71, r t' x. - t ~n u„ ~ ~ t p w ~S A 25 x _ t , 32 x 10 { I 41t c'~ ' • ~i l ` ' ~ x ~ n I _ r ~ .{,e7k J~~ I"9 aC ~ r' w 1 ~ { ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ f v ~e t ~rt i d o f J N I h V r e r 4,q G i '14 {M ,r-ti y Pv ° z~J °1 r 0 t,: 1 r Iti JI ih .v¢ '`IL 6 1 Iw M1' 1 y d y i r r Y q1, V F r 0 , I r n r~ e L 6 , 1 A 4 . 7 } J 9r tia~~ I r . ~I r ...6wF~.J.u.aiw;roik:.S-w ..w=........::,! ~....r;'. ~1. t.~ •I1::_:.....Ly..:wS....rr.,~..::-..,:~........:c:il'~....._ ~ t, r Population Data for Austin, Texas : R M,M TaR WIN lw m'm t IIn [ atM law aM _ 1 iw iN 1010 IN IN law ,M IM-_IIT'' -aE_--,IN_~- en - ~r Population Data for Fort WoM, Taxes wsrr-----------__--------- --slat , I nw i 1 Ia,M4 1 Iw - 7 1 tw O A Year Y 1y l r 10 I ..t~~~".. 25 x 10 32x10 o- j a i G. P 7.1 b ~G -0 4 la 1~i' a F x ~F i YW t~ r !C t 1 1 i p y.',' a ~ , v 7 I FS7 J;Itti n Y~ r ~A. 'S' > i., 4 I r Y du~c 4k f ~j I S t ~ a n C t w I'LL , . 1 r I t~l ~ ~'1 `i'S~ ~ ` 4. I `:f 6 n r ~ . K'~ A" 6r~ e1 I J tl I c 1 Y a 6 ~ 1.~;' f ^.I L ~~1 ~r~~,y LF~ ~.a ~I!v, J i`.4 J S rll d r 1 k~Y r~ .1 !o'.. 41 61-1 r 1 it •~Yi, Ir~~ ~.I ~y rri I ~ i' / r .I ~ L li~ r• / it W. J~'~~1^r• ~ 1 l.a Y ¢f ~~7e vii ;S f t' r rP~. JJ y r 1 d ~ C ] 1 p: Y. :xt; I ' at ; ?fir YY t 1 i 1 f 1 • u♦ • K Y • 1 F ~ .~I..O•:AiwY+naOaNeai.Y.a..~.w ,.n F. , ..-.«.,~..«..a,~r:...~u.•.._. ~f'_ • I' Y 12 ^yy 11 1 Population Data forOadarA Taus low law _ . .1 l., a law am % law 1 NMI w,w ;I am x naI WHO 1 M. LIA i t ~r 11.: 3'f am _ In.-. i rr IM ICI IW ICO Iw tw IM 1110 I IW , y8or Y Z I I ',r Paqu4tion Data for Gland Promp, Taut ra PS t G IBM a all YW 1 •.1 ,1•?. ab j 1 t h1 I a, W h 1, a W rrl r' ,w IMI Iw ICI Iw H01 1,. i; r• , rA; 75 x 10 32X 1 0 A' r n 1 R e 2 1 uv, ns Iii ! > 1 ggy c M, i t r la f I• fi' n 1 4 . i i,trry y~t°va l,' F v.!4 ~Ir«~, 'fir ~rl lx tw~~, Jlr 1 (x`,,J ar,i ~t1 ~yl r(I.l JO ~1 S I '~~x 5 n i L t 7 f . I , ~ L. I Y 5 A J k !,1 r cc f~~ c " I J e~ ' S Yu 'J h v 4 1 r n, F ^ rt a s l a s y I s "1 r ~ n yv b l l ~ ~ I L 7. 1 , ♦ Z I !.o Its F 'Irk, r, , l~ ~ r Y d v. ~.1 N1 ~ ff t s ii ~ 4 J I M t +~r S^ L ~ Y} ~ r J4 i j r ~G ~s~ ~~v r y C L ,s '1 e r +r t ~K ~ I rv Y . e . r 1 J J. . IJ o rl 1 r rv . r . r F . I' F r I • r r y 5 r ' \ nr~ ~ li 1 I 1 C I y ' e?r rl 1 } '~i vx l~ 9 ' d >I "s'*. x s 1 f ss % Population Data 1w hhnp, Texas mowr IMAM A W.M „ Ir.rr L. _ WYII WIN HlIm r r M NO , e rar r.w ! 'w 1 MAO am r pMM Ibl IFr IMP irl iW IW WO _ ,Ih I _ _ rW - _ Year p ! r ` r Population Dots for Mnqulp, Texas t 1r -44 Irr~ • M.Mf F r Y11 J ' I r ~ Ylq „ 1 Now 1I I f' 1 r N W4 "If o I'm If* to 0 Yur cr, l + r r /L N„~r I rl. . I I I I: r t 12 . , Jt ,r 1. 32 MR MR Room morm m u r, rr l r s v' et^; i y r a I 64 '7 'fix f f ~ r v f. ~ x '.I ! I i 1'~ I " 'i 'C k ~Lil i D ° 1, ~r d 1ta r7f . 4i~kr{L I I ?~I'e~, M p#. I i, e i ~0 4 V } 1 b I. t , ♦ t i k x I , F i'~ ~ U I i. 1 i I y r 1, ro ~ J r yp•, ~ T~ p ` Y 1 ~ t n • b. < t e '•l i" 1' t M` a L I f ; r 7 4, ,D J r .~yi.~I. 1 I v ! : L 4 X e 1~ " 1 v'. k ;i yll - ~0 + 7 ~ S.• ' CJ t v fit. - -t . I a a t , i~. t. `fa . 1 w J FJ Ie.: 1 1 MIS ~ ~ ~ \ + 1 r i~ ' F 1 ~ I rt 1 re. y vx,. 1 II a°rS ~ r r t ~ f S~ r s , 2 a 5 .M.:.i.ww'isaxlw t ....H.....r-..n..r...«:,...W......_,..,«,i~...... .L.. J. ~ Y r... ; I~ z Powlaw Diu for Parlor Texas i , I Iwo .i~ r r. ID J ' 00 `j NMI Ymj ~1 IL111~ D " r.r IN ml All" 1 am '.i . Ir Ir nre Ine Ir ire ON Var tl r i r PogubWn DIU for Pkh"On, Tan I , 77- r -00 I ; Ida r: $6.40 IRYI M! aim 1 • AM III r m ~ ' ' WON • low IO We IYO Itll IW it ~M NN I_ IM , • r' ~ 1 Year U , 1J a I D~ 32 x y,~~ I i t ' ~ r E i0 ~ i Y S 1f.. y 1: 1 ~ S ! 1 Il I p i Y P• 71x1 J i M M1 r r I~ r I y ' r rr d .1 wr ~ r . ~1 l ! 41 I L ' ~1 ti 5 I . I u f 1~ 0 r 'p I #409 kid / / I Population Estimates t North Central Texas Council of Go%•ernments Research and Information Services Summary of Regional Population Estimates Y' c rdorlh Cenlral Te6as region Continued to grow at a brisk popula!-on base each year as the much larger cities (3.650) a _e last scar adding 83000 people for a total 1995 Fort Worth grew by another 3 500 people last year, population of 4.414.300 ti"dah 97 expanding regional lob banging is population to 470000 t;,zn pripolalion yrOwth has increased Substantially ovEr 1 5 yea s redere ng the out m,g,abon of the iate Nine cities in the NCTCOG region have grown by more l '.7. A -d e9rly 1x9905 to po;dive net in migralion in the than 304.° since the 1930 Censi1s, which is fcor times the u yea-s Slnee the 1990 Census, the region has regional average They include Frisco (123'_) , Flower grown by 302000 ll wdli 571, of this growth Mound (84'0 , Southlake Ie0'°). Highland Village l4260), cr'r. Ir1Nj in vie last two years Coppell (411,) Allen (371e) Rowlett 137'°) Plano (320-a) and Keller (30''°). With the exception of Plano. more of sl of n u yro:.lh nas been in Collin Ddllas Denlon, and these cities has a population giealer than 35.000, While Ta ,ant Counbos Thii tour counties represent 901, of all most of these cities are not among Ile largest in the region, - reglonal growth or 270000 people, in the last 5 years they do represenl a concentration of population gro~Vh in Tre, hrgs~;t popuialion gain during ti--s span was in Collin close proximity to the Highway 121 corridor (see map on C,.r)ly Ectv.ecn 1990 and 1995 Collin County grew by page 5). eXandmg south from the Hurst-Eu!ess•Sedlord 8? OCO pe0p'e v, 111 30'. of this gro mh occurring last year area to the northeast into cenlral Collin County Much Of Tarrant County ranks a close second adding 80.000 the growth along H ghway 121 is atVlbuted to D'FW Airport PC: the bels,een 1930 and 1995 Dallas County grew by wh ch has long been an economic boost not only to the 69 000 dxiriq the first ha !f of Itie 1990 s while Denlon cities surrounding it but to the entire Dallas Fort Worth County adder) 41000 people to its lolal during this five MetropleK year per,orl S n,-li1rty five cities added 32°.° of all new growth in the Annual Regional Growth - re ~nn last year Plano which has led population growth 156000 i L , C ery yeti, since line 1990 Census added 10000 people s' year Further tetv,eerl 1990 and 1995, Plano added t_ a -o 51 as many reeple as all of Denlon County Dallas 100 000 o . 1 t'! an inr•reas ro supply and demand for mulli-lamily j i f r ;,,s nq gre,v by an add r oval a 200 people with most of 1'- t+" ~nr,iease laking pla4e in the North and Far North as well 50.000 rt e Uptown a,ea Arlington grew by another 3.800 e:p'e tast year Ali a large portion of this growth in the sa !hwest Flower Mound while substantially smaller than o 0t`-er high growth areas, is adding as many people to its 1000 1940 1091 1007 1997 1004 1005 A 41 1 ~~~~10' 32x1 ,~'3 0 „ , , 7 ~4'l E.:1 9 .U'p 1 a .Y y: 1 • ,i. . ,;c r r, , . ' .i rT' r ti ` t ~ I ~ ~t t > 1r r~~ " ~1 ~ li i~l 1 1 r ' r r/ ri u a 7 i 1 ~ ~r 1 , 1 i % . ' I ' V Compound Annual - ' ' Final Final Flnal Revised Rwlaad Estimated Growth ' Consul Cmeus Consul Population population population Pala . i king QIW Ill VIA] Hill SYIAS WOODS r Collin County 67,421 145 255 264,030 302 an 320 400 344,450 5 704. , Allan' t,o40 1314 79.315 11 no 24 000 26,600 860'. Coma 1212 1,520 1777 1.750 1750 1.750 016'. : e F4rd4w " 463 193 1.554 1.7$0 t 6SO 1170 400'. F4rme,wi9a 2.311 2360 2640 2650 2650 2.650 006'. F4aco' 1,645 3.499 6.136 6400 11.000 13,700 10421. .le Lucas Sal 1,310 2205 2250 2250 2,400 160'. McKinney 15.193 16 ass 21.263 23,350 25400 27,550 554'. MWpnY 261 4150 1.547 1P560 1550 1,650 1.37'. P4da' 361 1.096 1.213 1450 1.300 1,450 313' P4n0' 17,672 72731 12161s 13000 156490 ifill $031. Punci 1.105 3.400 2446 2400 2400 2,500 0441. P10041 Sol 619 1,016 1,050 1.100 1100 352'1 Wy14 2675 3.152 4716 1.100 9050 1600 205' Pomander of Collin County 17.550 Ip 029 30290 31, too 31500 32.000 115'. - Spill Cme4 2.790 11 30 311 42 650 461S0 50,750 730'. CaNds county 13al dos 1.556.765 1652910 1864 ISO 1102550 102,400 077.1 Addnon $93 5557 1713 1450 0950 10,150 3095 Ili 5P'in9e 10464 13146 17404 17.S5o 11000 11 250 100'. 1 Cella, Hill' 2610 6649 10906 21.40 13050 24,50 4Di Cacknll Min ISIS 3262 3745 3.750 7100 3100 030'. Copper 1.726 3626 lie 101 It No 21.900 23,100 7. so'. 041114' 144401 904.016 1001411 1ot7, 157 1021.0so 1030.150 047'. Di 6.617 is 536 30 $44 gall 33 150 33 400 2 t6'. puncanv:ne' t4,105 27741 75006 35.050 35100 311 0Do'. Farms, 11 21,492 24.667 24250 24.350 24400 21.400 013'. Gen", 11437 136 657 160135 164 200 100 291 112200 132'. Glenn He:/nt4 257 1033 4$64 4,$50 4600 4,850 039' Grand P,a ne- 50904 7L462 09606 101.100 102750 103550 012'. - ' Highland Pad 10.133 a 900 1 739 1.700 a 700 6.150 003'. HoLhms 1.its 2177 2710 2.700 2750 2.750 0241. Irving 91.260 109043 155037 161,050 164050 155,050 144' LanG910, 10522 14101 22117 22450 22151 22600 040' . 61os0uee 65111 67,053 10146, 106$50 107350 1o94 s0 160' R,chardw 4S40S 72494 14640 76650 71 on 70200 093'. Row+etl 2243 7$22 23250 27.200 20 SW 31,600 601•. sachp 777 1 $40 6 746 Sam $ 250 6.630 4 10"1 - sea2imne 4]90 7,704 1909 9150 0350 9450 1.11'. Sun nyvald 995 1.404 2.221 2250 2251 a300 061'. Unweryq Park 23496 22.254 22.259 22.700 22350 22350 01 Wd.ner 1.022 2367 2479 9.500 aSoo a.500 018' Remaoder 01 Dotal Cuunty 14,9x0 1.152 6115 a 230 4 250 0250 SPI4 i 162141 1267411 131.193, 130$501 14L 950r I5,, 6001 •1061'. 04nton County 75633 143.560 277525 249.050 313950 21? ISO 321'. 0:pv1e 443 1.111 1575 1,eso Ion 7.0017 403' Ili 771 946 1,lip I,ISO 1150 MOO •071'. cis::o111an tress 40.5a0 62169 43.150 42000 90,700 110'. camth 461 1.264 3944 4100 4x50 1.500 422'. ' Cii 39874 44.063 $6210 67,100 N ISO 4o Iso IN'. Douel0 Oak NI 030 1 064 1,700 1.100 1,760 1.071. Fiche, Mound ,,ass 4.402 15527 20.100 94 I00 21,550 1360". H,ciaryc, k. all 1422 1.623 1800 1150 1.950 063'. Highland Vdlape Its 3246 7.027 1050 1.100 10,000 1W. 1 I• Min 741 920 1234 1250 1 300 2300 1.101. Krum 454 9th ,.542 1,000 1050 1,650 144'. Lek, Dil 1 3.117 3654 37D0 3750 2900 137.1 Lew wills 12114 242+1 At 521 48.850 $0900 12800 9 70'. ' Lml4 Elm 363 926 1.259 1.am 1.150 1,150 •162.1 E PW Pomi 1 $67 2 211 1536 9.550 2 f00 2750 1.70'. Poanos4 111 910 1 its 1.730 181110 1,000 747'. 51 1,$03 2154 3.514 3.650 3.050 4,100 3X.. . • shady shon4 543 013 1,OAS I.too 1 300 1.750 154'. Tir e Ca10ny NI 12 400 12 113 22 700 11 23 100 002'. bonny clue NI NI .1 1924 4050 900 1400 90'. Re,nanda of Donlon county 12,026 21 ,9 521 99 o" 30.750 722300 33 500 3 04'. ' sp1i 1 cn., 1000 11 l+: 125 $461 !45500! 124 e5c, 2244501 •I 13'. ti. f Enle County - 4d.238 59743 1s 067 SS Son 16130 90 300 i 14' Elmer 11,04F 19,110 13169 14050 14200 14150 012'. Faun 2,140 2221 2212 2200 9200 1.200 -0n'. rely 1,309 1,306 1809 1700 1.700 VIA) 002'. Mpillon'sm, a$22 3210 1049 6,150 6550 1750 211'. Ovals 339 1.061 aoa7 1100 2000 2.40 W, p,i $01 1,147 list 4150 1.030 4854 all' - Pod Oak 70 1,662 3.124 $200 3450 3$ad 272'. .r AT x 10 32x0 air ) aT ' ! ' w >9l ~ ~ . : + .,I~4 d,~a y 2 r a C V Ia I 0 3 +1 p 1 ~ e ° 4 .J / 7 t bV / ~ t 1 i r O 1 -2 Compound Annual Final Final Final Awleed Sell Estimated Crowlin Census Census Consul Population Populaion Populaion II .Ic oil 171110 b4190 51179] 111194 11119s 1090.199t r Ft' Ell e County fconlll y'a.a MOha' 13472 14,624 17,964 lasso to ISO 19000 116'. ' Pemamdet at Ellis County 14131 21.926 56 542 37.100 36050 3610 1 16'. Spilt Piles . 191 194 712 700 700 750 .035'. troth County 16.141 22560 97.991 26,100 76250 :6.450 054'. Min 2010 2.723 3.190 $.200 7 250 3 250 0 32'. Srephenwns 9277 11!61 13502 13550 13600 13100 03 1 , Remands, of Erath County Ill 7956 1!.299 11.350 11430 11,500 07/'. Hood County 6.366 17,114 28961 21 29100 30600 1+S'. ' G.ano'.Iry 2113 3332 4.045 4.100 4.150 4,250 103'. Peron nder of Noad Count' 3 695 14.362 24 936 25 300 75 650 26.350 1 171. Huol County 47.9x6 55241 64.343 65200 ac 350 65250 033'. Gallo Male 935 1060 100a 1,100 1100 1.1N 062'. Commoce 9534 a150 6625 6150 6650 6900 023'. 0'19mltis 22043 22161 23071 23200 233% 23150 007'. Cum~an 644 1.002 1.x10 1.450 1450 1,450 , 31'. l Ply 1 433 1.594 1.505 1 500 1 SO 1 $00 •0 07'. I Pemandn of Hull County 12678 20.455 30714 31.100 31, I51 21.150 04x'. Johnsen County 45769 67649 97165 9s 350 100250 102700 117'1 A rnaao 2129 2701 2916 2250 2950 3000 0s9'. 11,1"an 7.7+3 11 734 16113 16.150 11.400 11,950 2 33'. 1 t el l 16 015 19 211 22 205 22 300 22 350 12,600 0 37'. G'+rdve« 935 1,205 1. 245 1250 1250 1750 CCs'. Jcahue' 924 1470 3521 3900 4050 4300 252'. leena 2410 301) 3944 x050 4290 4.450 257'. pellil of JChnson County 15541 794:9 48255 49200 50257 61 ex 142'. s0l POn 19341 111011 11.3x3! 120501. 12200! 12.430! Keulman County 32641 39 N7 52220 53350 1$050 56300 1 s0'. Comb.na 242 69s 1 329 1 350 1 am 1 450 1 11S'. P6ndall 714 651 1652 1.750 2000 2100 I11'. Panay 1.745 2483 4 070 4 200 4 350 4450 1 1 1:+41711 An' 4012 4658 5251 5350 5600 5500 091'. v.omp 992 1035 1184 1200 1200 1200 02a'. 6404^M 1 239 1443 145a 1.450 1 500 1 $50 1 301. inlell 14162 1320 12AW 12 SW 12$10 12650 0271 P.mamon+1 i Cauny 9569 15447 25226 25950 27050 27,650 211'. SPLI Cme1 11291 11371 17061 14501 14701 14501 Navarro County ` 31.434 35323 M926 39850 39900 40.100 0091. Oa'. Cm1•ur4 19972 21.712 22911 22150 27900 23000 0 name 1446 1562 1.702 1.100 1700 1700 002'. Pala rdl OF t l Ccanly 9.132 12 029 15113 '.5300 15 300 15100 0 12'. Pala pima Col 28962 24062 25057 28.450 26430 26.450 113'. 44 re, al WOlu' 18411 Asea 14935 14 05C 14800 1411130 012'. Re'amde• OF Palo fl Cou,l1 10 Sao INl 10681 ,1 .650 11650 11.550 167'. SPnr Clloe(1351 1371 L021 sal Sol (SO) m Feel County 33. sea ~AI x09 64.795 65150 66550 69000 134'. - A. edu 620 1077 1169 1,150 1.,50 1.200 055'. , P0," 686 1174 2322 2300 2400 x450 114'. , • Sp,npicwn 1.194 1 858 1.740 1.750 1.750 1 Soo 0 721. y+talhnlomd 11750 12049 4304 15050 15500 is 140 131'. ll PrA 230 1.113 2376 2350 2400 1450 1051. A Van OF, OF P nee r C owy 11117 26658 40731 41.300 42300 44050 166'. 11 SP1a Cltee 789 930 1.665 1750 1 250 1750 .1 Co.. Pocewen County 7066 ~_1Ab2s 25604 27,300 29250 30ISO ISO'. Heart S20 1,451 7.106 2300 2500 2700 $35'. 1 All 3121 5939 10486 11 ISO 11150 12100 306°. pvr60 Gla 1575 1,566 2206 1200 2450 2100 96". Re,I do, OF ROCa A oil Cl 1.605 4561 7.525 7.750 1030 1200 162'. 1 • si Col #a 265 997 3279 3.900 4400 4650 163'. Q jv Somlrvoll county 73 4154 1300 5350 $350 5350 -004'. Glan Fla" 1$14 2073 1940 .1950 1950 1950 ,00!'. ` / Panamdr al Somor,oll Counly 1.:39 1.079 3411 3400 3400 3400 '007'. 711 rent Counly }IS 367 661.$31 1.170103 1703650 12311'0 t250.7l0 141'. Anmpron' 90 229 160.113 x61.717 269 750 276100 279 600 Ate 4493 6.822 aa66 1.160 1150 9.300 1x1•, RNIa'd 10049 20.821 43162 4/ sox 45000 /1,700 092'. AV .i SxI[- 32XIO Fol % r 1 r 1, 1t G ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ a S ( R 6 4 1 i ' v1 ~ , r t ~~t ' , % mv~ra6r ' ' 1 , r , , Compound , Annul Final Final li Fl 0,901h Cenaue Cenaue Census Populallon Population Populatlen mate ' uln0 4111110 Clow $1147 10131 Inns ln(li99s I To,rant County (COn7lnli , Beni 6169 13579 19514 19.750 19950 20150 062`, l ldovr4 1263 2169 2133 2200 2350 2,350 206', a Col's ywlla 3342 4700 17724 14.450 15200 14000 4911, " Go4YV 2662 5852 6970 7,000 7,050 7.100 039. Cacclrun91en 031den4 7$7 1.100 1758 1900 2000 lose 329 Ed;0c'm Village 1.143 2695 271$ 2.700 2.700 2750 027., 1 19310 24002 38149 38.600 39300 39.750 04T, Emman ASl0 5307 7672 5450 5700 5750 029', Foan Hill 1235 11681 11482 It 450 11450 IIAS0 -006'. f04 Nl0 nn 795455 305.164 447.619 459,150 467,100 470,150 100'. Gin emna' 7.049 11.001 29.196 30750 32.500 33-000 261., Hs +:m ally 28.127 29014 32656 3:450 33100 33350 031', Hv.11 27215 31420 33574 34.200 34950 35.550 1.21': Kell, 1474 4156 13654 15.550 16700 1I've $69 KP-i,.,le 3070 2594 4096 4.200 4450 4150 2.24', LAIa Vi 4958 4394 4S9t 4600 4670 4.650 027 , 6'e^ereW 3650 al02 13619 15300 17250 16.250 334', NAcnla„d+dY Is $14 30592 45697 47,500 49550 50650 110 ' pvioa m 1 779 2431 2 37, 2 350 2 350 2 35(. .0 1; of can Bay NI NI 1271 1250 1250 1,300 041 A, rend Hills 6165 7.977 7.971 1010 1150 1 ISO 0 r5 , Ri 4.Oaks 1193 8 890 6.$80 6 550 6 ON 9.400 000". SAS, A* 2302 3736 1.551 1550 1700 0300 1.781, Se-1'n, Awl, 4771 3921 3926 7900 3900 3400 •013': Seloln,a~e' 2031 2896 7082 1.550 111650 11!10 13 Io, , Yya'a.0a 3778 10264 20009 20450 20450 214050 1071 VlCelwonh V^494 4 574 3 651 2 350 2 350 2 350 2.350 0 Oe' N.^ne StlhemPll 17449 13506 1s 472 is 450 ism 15400 .0 fat: 410-8,10e, of Tvaml coumir 24366 30019 34044 34550 35 am 35,'00 0y7 Sc1'Gbaa ?600 4397 11139 19.400 20650 21,500 101' wiae Counly 21 A'$ 21 452 34679 31.750 35300 35,000 055', Bor: 695 802 1041 1.050 1050 1,100 11i - / 8 0!±od 3614 3737 3Set 3600 3Sh, 7400 Ott , 1 DOIA'I" 3240 a. t04 4104 1150 4350 1,100 140'. pv~ A n:1u 01 ^ Counly 11 415 16 955 25 805 25 950 24 309 20,500 0 Sic Nine CC,mly Vi D9- Area 240152 2931293 1885415 4010400 4100750 4,192.Soo Ise' ICOr:., Oil as Ci- A Eli, 11011011. Knur^an pa,lcr Rix'.a:, Term[, NCiC00 Beg on(14ii 2$06442 3119406 4111.750 4219500 4331.1 0 4411,300 151', , a 1990 C:,c,'ar0,rc'a'4nn. a teen 00i Crisped by me Ceroul Pon eu AMad to splitCl111s Populallon Adde le SpIItC1UN Poputatlon CQVIn C2421Y Dllla9 31,701 tmugCount Y Olann Heights 107 . F11chlydson 12,124 Mor lhld 153 . Sachsa 431 Cedar Hill 62 Al Clty 161 Grand Pralrle 4 i Garland 15 Johnson Count Monshmid 361 Dat!IaS0.V0ty Carrollton 43,297 Combine 141 Kaufman Ca52Dty Ddlaa / Oraplvlnl 1 Sugovlll6 3 lewlsvllle 1,313 Collis 3111 C6fkILIC004 Atli 9,231 ' . Wylie 64 Mineral Wells 31 1 O1Ncn_C9>.LOIy Datgs 11,224 RoikismiNg3tD1Y Kowlatt 4,115 , fr40o 1,010 Dallis 71 6outhlaAe 344 Wylie 71 Plano 174 Coppell / LBf dtillob Burleson 2,795 Fort Worth 3 Grand Frafde 20,790 For 14Chnlcat quealione ttntar,l 6r7an llabe, RnaeeR and Information $@,vl01,14C7000, To order teplea 61 this and other COO PubnOallana, ii Area felt, Pollonal Information Cenler, NCTCOO, NI Bit Flags Drive, Suite 00, P, O. lot 096, Arlln9le*, Tease 160065454, (ittj 5467300 i 1 z1 2h 32x~[I All I. Ammm- ~y ti' I I ~ ~ r ! t y" i r: r I Q Rraerau4 ` i l Hwy. 121 Growth Corridor ...r SEEMSET i u~a j xnrq' i ......1 I ~ I I , 11'I.J lilt M:1 I ' I 1 I I I 1 , I F, a 1 Cenlon Co. ~ I I R. ,.;u,,r;l AW f I :'t Fb.a~a aK j Him 121 rA IIA ~0, .i.... ...i T. 1 fou nW r 9e4r Cofir Food 1 i , I I , r I I Tartant Ca Dllla! Co Population Estimates Methodology: NCTCOO s pnputahon estimales are based on current housing rates were used In conjunction wile bull6ng permit data to Ili snto•:as for each city in the NCT000 region with a population produce city level populalion estimates. Final population for of ,000 or more. The figures are reviewed at the regional level for January 1. 1995 also Includes estimates of persons living In group eorslslency with other indicalor9 of regional population such as quarters (nursing homes, dormltones, etc.). All figures are labor force estimales and ON stal shcs reviewed by each city prior to publication. County level estimili r are adlusled for cities that ere In more then one county. Cities complete a building permit form that provides NCTCOO Remainder of county totals are ashmaled based upon secolWary 4. with Information on budding completions, demolitions. ennelalions resources and have been adjusted to reflect 111nar2110% ~t and other changes In housing sock Ihal occurred Ihroughoul the for year. Tho reported housing units by type (single lam'rly, multi Revised population estimates require prlor year adjustments .mily. other) are added to the 1990 Census housing stock figures through methodological changes to ensure consistency The to develop estimales of current year housing stock. Persons per compound annual growth column provides a convenient Indicator household figures and occupancy rates were adjusted slightly In of the annual geowlh rate for each oily end c )unity from 199010 order to account for nalional trenda as well as regional and local the current year, comparable to a compound Interest tale, rates observed from secondary data sources and surveys. These Ali% 3,11 x V 7 'p l r.$ ilr~ E a 1~ Irv ~ r e,'ah ~i a~iy~y~p✓ t, ' ] ~ ~ n t lr, ~ ~ ✓ t ,i ' I ' e ~r ' [ r v 1 Pi r l 1 • 1 ~d f v 1 v.j 1 ' +A'Y I ~ L. MAP OF THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS RE 31ON (AN CIHes aver 1,000) - s IT rte. r ......:'.'N'ee.. Wi31 M.. V , V ~ Nl}re r Y •ri+ eyr LIr v1 YT e..,r Ln. 'M J NONT w • n.we. u: '.In 1w rlOCewM,L •..w..a bn. •e.rl . . YOV. W. Yr} ...r. r ..r4'y e40 nNT0 PSPrll1 fNNaANT. a ` we r oft ^ '.j Bald Naol) 1o"som .]i M1r IUVfNaN 104aMIL , Y.:y ( - WIVMaO i Bulk Rat[ No,lh CnlrAl 7era1 CounCil of GovernmenIS U.S. POSOTAGE i r Ceni[r"ml Two. 516 Six Flags Onve PPAA );1 P. 0 Boa 588E Aii.n0lon, Texas 4 Arlin9ron, 7X 76XS-5868 Parini 90 n i ykI 1 25 w C 32 x 1 o LM e 'y F. i ; A A rarvaxro r , 190 Population Estimates I April 1997 North Central Texas Council of Governments Research and Information Services Summary of Regional fourth and fifth with population growth rates of 13% and 1211, respectively, These three cities all sit within the Population Estimates State Highway 121 Corridor that has defined high growth in the 1990s , Corinth and Murphy fianked Frisco as the The North Central Texas region grew by 112,175 persons first and third fastest growing cities last year with rates list year. yield ng a total 1997 population of 4,653,325 of 18'a and 1400, respectively. These two small cities are This growth in excess of 100,000 marks the first time in the re!ative newcorners to the top ranks of high growth cities 1990s that new migrants or relocations account for more and represent the second tier effects of the Slate Highway \ than one-half of the region's new residents. These 121 Corridor. migrants are drawn by a sustained economic boom in North Central Texas that created more than 80.000 new Ne,., housing construction also saw a ten year high In the jobs lasr year with an unemploymenr rate of 4.0°o number of units completed (37,721) as developers tried to keep pace with the region's popisation growth. Eleven Cities captured 50°0 of ell the growth in the North Economic migrants help explain the 46% Increase In Central Texas area last year. Plano, again, led all cities by multi-family construction as 12,832 multifamily units adding 11,350 new porsons, Dallas ranks second at were completed last year. This trend promises to continue 8.250, fo!!o,sed by Fort Worth (6,650). Arlington (5.850), into 1997, as an additional 15,000 units are already Lewisville (4.200), Flower Mound (4,150), Allen (3600). permitted for construction this year. Multifamily Irving (3,400), Garland (2,850), Grand Prairie and construction has not only increased In total numbers but McKinney (each with 2.800). All of these cities are In the has also spread beyond the four core counties and Into region's four core counties of Collin, Dallas, Denton and more cities, in 1995, only fourteen cities in our region Tarrant, added at least 50 new multifamily units, In 1996, there 0 v.ere twenty-four cities that built 60 or more units and Consequently, the four core counties accounted for ii of almost 600 units were built outside the core counties, all last year's growth, achieving a total combined population of 4,035,000 persons. Tarrant led all counties Annual Reglonal Growth in fatal growth with 27,600 persons, However, Collin County displayed the highest annual growth rate at 7°o, adding 25,900 new persons. Collin also is the only county 150,000 in the region that has grown by more than 5010 since the _ Q 1990 census. Dallas County closely followed Collin in total growth with 25.800 new persons and Denton County grew 100,000 by almost 5°o this year adding 16,400 persons r' r 50,000 Fill Frisco, the region's second fastest growing city in 1996 at a rate of 1600, tripled Its 1990 Census population this 0 w year, Southlake and Flower Mound, the only other titles 1992 1993 1994 1995 1998 11997 1991 reporting morn than twice therr Census counts ranked rr 1, '2~t IF 1, t C e 1 s r r f 5 ~4 fit. F. eacame Ca4npound - Al l FLut Final Final Revised Revtoed Neurluled GrovAh Consul Census Census Population Population Population Ran 1 41,70 am= 411190 "Its 1MA6 1MI17 1990-1997 { Collin County 66,920 140,576 264,D36 346,400 371,200 31 6.23% + ` Al 1,440 1314 19.313 26,900 29,450 33050 a20% Celina 1,272 1,520 1,737 1750 I'll 1,900 1.34% FaiMew 463 693 1,SS4 2.000 2.100 :.300 5IMM Farmerril 2,311 2,360 2,640 2650 2.650 2.650 0D6% v Fusco' 1,645 3499 6,136 13650 Is 450 19.100 1031% Lucas 540 1,370 2.205 2400 2650 21000 360% MaKirmay 15,193 16,255 21,283 20400 31150 34.050 7,21% M cphy 261 1,150 1,547 1,650 1,650 2.100 4.63% cartel, 367 1,096 1,213 1450 1,550 1,650 4.66% Plano' 17,672 72.331 127,665 169900 161,050 192,400 6.24% Princeton' 1,105 3,406 2,448 2,500 2000 ,2,650 118% Prosper 501 675 1,016 1.200 1,300 1,400 4.63% Wylie 2475 3,152 1,716 9.850 10,100 10,700 3.06% Remain0er of Colin County 17,765 20,109 30.019 33.100 34,050 35,000 2.30% Spirt Cmas 2,790 IMI 36116 51.000 62.350 53.350 Dallas County 1,327,696 1,556,419 1,852,610 1,0311 SO I,p50.600 1,978,600 096% Ad0ison 593 5,553 6,763 10.200 10950 11,100 353% Balch Springs 10,464 13746 17,400 10300 t9.350 Ill 091% Cedar Hill' 2,610 6.649 t9,986 24450 25,550 21 496% Cocknl Hill ISIS 3.262 3,146 3.600 3,600 3,000 0.21% r Coppell 1,726 3,626 16,661 24.050 25.500 27,350 7,53% , Damao' 644,401 904,078 1,D07,511 1,034,400 1,039100 1,041 0.57% DeSolo 1617 15,538 30.544 33.950 34.750 3S,300 2,17% Duncsnv104' 14,105 27,701 35,006 35,300 35.650 ISM 0.35". F srmom 9'urch 21,492 24,963 24,250 24,500 24.111 25,400 069% Garland' 51,437 138657 160,635 193.100 195 SW 199.350 1.40% Glenn Height 257 1,033 4,561 4,650 4,050 5,050 t 61% Grand PmJ iq 50,900 71,462 99.606 104,350 105,350 101,150 1.23% Highland Park 10,133 6.909 6,139 9050 0IN 1.450 1.11 Hutchins 1,715 2.837 2,719 2.750 2750 2750 0.17% twit 97.290 109943 155 031 166.350 169 200 172600 1.60% Ler,casler 10522 14807 22.117 22750 22.950 23400 0.84% ktes'Me 55,131 67,053 101,484 109,850 111.550 113,400 166% Richordwn 48405 72.495 74,610 70750 61,100 83,150 1,57% ;**let 2,243 LS22 23160 32.350 34400 36730 7,01% Sach @ 777 1.640 $946 6,700 6060 7,150 4.40% Seagoville 4,390 1,304 6.969 0500 0.800 10,250 2.00x Sunnyvale 995 1404 2125 2300 2.350 2.400 1.11% Uni'eniy Park 23.493 22154 22159 23000 23,100 23850 103'. wfmar 1,922 2967 2,479 2300 2300 2,500 a 13% Remainder at D13e$ County 16.941 9,161 6.127 6.250 6250 4250 0. t31k Spill Cities 7,641 11,654 (31093) 152100) (54,9501 1604001 Denton County 75,633 143,125 273,325 320,400 335650 332,050 3.81% Arve 443 1,11f 1,375 1.950 2.000 2,000 3.6011 Autrey 731 940 1,136 1,100 1,100 1,150 0.16% Control 13,855 40,595 62.160 Ill 93.000 95,050 211% Copper Canyon NI 465. 970 t.I SO 1,200 1200 2.04% Corinth 451 1.261 3,914 4.900 6,3Cd 0.250 7.00% Donlon 39,674 48 D63 66.270 09.800 70,450 71.450 1.12% OouHa Oak HI 135 1,564 1,000 1,850 2,050 2.1/% Flory, Mound 1.665 4.402 13,527 29,600 33,100 314550 14.16% HKhoy Creek 210 1,422 1,493 2000 ,2000 2450 1.19% Higi Yulage 616 3146 7,027 10,350 10.800 11,300 729% Milli 741 920 1,234 1,300 1,400 Iwo 2.13% Krum 454 117 1,542 1,650 1,760 1,600 232% 1.0t Dallas 1,431 3.171 31% 4.130 4650 5100 638% ' .4wiv,1I 1,264 24.273 46.521 57350 57,500 11,700 427% LihMl Elm 363 926 1,255 1,150 1100 1,250 (006x) F401 Pomf 1,663 2211 2,936 2800 1.850 2,000 199% Roanoke 617 910 1610 1900 1,900 1,950 2.62% Sanger' 1,603 2,754 3,514 4,100 4150 4,200 266% ShadY Shone 543 013 1,045 1.350 1.3$0 1,500 650% The Coomy to 11,566 22,113 23150 6330) 23,650 1.00% Trophy Cn,o NI Ni 3.022 4,400 4150 51150 4,12% Rome Inds, of Donlon County 12,626 11,870 25,072 31.600 32.950 34,100 292% Spill C01e4 (11855) 27563 (25.5661 (24300) 1236001 01300) , E1118 Cow my 46,638 119,743 15.161 91.700 03650 90400 1.01% Ennis, 11,040 111 t0 13,869 14,450 14,650 14,900 1.07% forms 2,110 2926 2112 2100 1100 9.200 1006x1 r holy 1,309 1306 1,899 1,750 1,150 1.750 0.44% 1 Mclothisn' 2,322 32t9 1040 5,000 6,050 0,250 324% 01% Leif Ni W 064 1400 I,DSO 1100 1.66% 0,14 339 1,007 2027 ,2,550 2650 2,100 4,90% Pal,nv1 601 1,101 7,059 1,650 1,100 1.700 0.36% ,r _ ? % MCA 32x~❑ 3. . l r . 1r ~ S ~ Compound Annual Fuel Find III Revised Revised Estimated GrovKh Census Census Census Populallon Population population Rate 4MI70 4A180 4l1AO 111195 ///196 111197 1190.1197 Ellis Count' (eontlnueM Red Cal 767 1,882 3,124 3.600 4.050 4,450 538<. Wa.ehschie' 13450 14,624 17,964 19.100 11.150 20,000 I.59% Pemender of Ellis Count' 14,431 21,938 35057 38 NO 39. No 40.750 1.91% ~ Spot Cnies 191 194 712 no 800 900 ~ E rdh County 18.1u 222,560 27,991 29.050 29350 30,200 1.13% Dubin 2 810 2.723 3190 3,250 3 250 3,300 050% 5lephenvilu 9.277 11.681 13,502 13700 13,750 14,300 0e5% Remainder of ECM County 6.054 7,956 11,299 12100 12 350 12,500 t 63% Hood County 6,368 17,714 28,961 32,350 33500 35,000 264% Gnarl 2473 3.332 4.045 4,250 4.500 5050 3.34% Rameinder of Hood County 3.69S 14.302 24.936 28,100 29.000 29,950 2.75% Hunt County 47,946 111 64.343 65400 65700 68,100 040•. CaxpMirs. 935 1,060 1.068 1,100 1, too 1,100 044% Commela 9534 8,130 8.825 71000 7,000 7,100 059% GreanAll, 22043 22,161 2? 171 23150 23350 231500 027% C7uidan 544 1,002 1,300 1ASO 1,Soo 1,500 146% Wdle CITY 1433 1,594 1.505 1.550 1,550 1,550 044% RamaindeF of Hum County [3159 21,295 30514 31,050 31100 31,350 040% Johnson County 45789 67,649 97,185 103,750 loIll 107,650 1.54% Alvarado 2,129 2,701 2,918 3.000 3.050 3,100 0.90% euri 7,713 11,734 16,113 17,950 16350 16,650 2.35% Cleburne Ia015 10,218 22.205 22700 22150 23,400 0.71% Grand0ew 935 1.205 1245 1.250 1,750 1,300 0.64% Joshua' 924 1470 3 921 4.300 CAM 4,550 262% Keene 2.140 3 013 3 944 4450 1450 4,500 1.97% Venus 414 S11 977 1600 1 650 1.650 Ill Remainder of Johnson Couny 16133 28.841 47205 50,950 52.100 53100 176% Spill Cries (9341 (1.101) 11343) (2450) 12.650) 12.7001 Kaufman County 32392 390;5 52220 50730 $8050 59.350 1,111 Combine 249 638 1329 1430 1300 1,350 2.St% Cr4ndao 774 831 1657 2,100 2700 2.250 4.68'6 Forney 1.745 2483 4070 4,450 4.700 4,850 2.63% K4UIman• 4012 4,659 5 251 5 Soo 6.550 5600 096% Kemp 9N 1,035 1,164 1,200 1200 .1,200 020: Milbank 1,239 1,443 1459 1350 1,550 1,800 1.39% Tsrtl 14,182 13225 12,490 12,650 12.650 12,750 0.31% Remainder of Ka ufman Couny 9.320 14,779 25494 26,300 29.150 30000 2.44% Spin Cries (126) (137J 1708) (450) 14501 (450) Navarro County 31,150 35323 39.025 40.309 40,350 40,500 021% Ccnmana 19972 21,712 22911 23,000 23.000 23,050 009% ll 1446 1.552 1,702 1700 1,700 11700 (002%) Remainder of ful county 9.732 12,029 15,313 15.6% 18.650 15, 75o 0.0% Palo Pinto Country 26962 24,062 25055 25 NO 26,050 27,350 1.314". Mineral Wells' 18411 11466 14.135 11850 14450 11,000 I'M Remsirdef of Palo Pero County 10.586 9,631 to 602 10,750 11,050 11,300 0.93% Spin lilies (35) (371 (482) (50) (SO) (50) r r Porker County 37.888 44, W9 64766 73 ISO 77.100 84225 3.22% . A43a 620 1,027 1, 16a 1,200 1150 1,350 2,16% Hudwn Oaks Ni 309 711 1,150 1200 .t2W 106% ll 686 1,174 2322 2450 2500 2,650 1.96% Spnn9bwn 1,194 1,656 1740 1,800 1.600 1,850 091% Weatnerlord 11,750 12042 14604 16,550 16000 111,550 3.40% III Pek 230 1,11) 2.320 3,050 3.100 3150 $54% Sand ar d Parley County 11,611 26,349 47026 46,100 48.000 60.000 3.35% Sp1n C,iu 789 930 INS 1.250 1,250 1,175 Rockwell County 7,040 14.526 25604 31,050 32,150 34,500 4. S2% Huth 520 7459 2.101 2.750 1.030 3,130 6,13% Rockxan 3,121 6934 10.466 12,200 13000 13.000 4.15% Royse CM 1,535 1.566 2206 2.650 2,700 2,750 3.32% Remainder of Rakwal County 1,1105 4.567 7,525 1,700 9,050 0,400 3.35% sod cores 265 097 3.279 4,750 8,050 9400 lomerven County 2,793 1154 5360 5.600 6,700 8,750 1.05% ° Glen posts 1,654 2.075 t949 1,050 1150 1,050 001% Remainder of So"Nen County 1,230 2179 3411 3 NO 3750 3,600 1.61% Tdr and County 115,361 150,860 1170,103 1,256450 1,279,200 1,301.600 1.65% ArMgion' 90221 160,113 261717 26t,150 227,000 292650 1.6ex ~Q 32XIO -Mm n! 1~, n I I u a ,1 1, d ~~r 1 r (.'1 + ray, I t l ' t ~ ' r 1 , w 5 . . 4 s + II i 1 1 r 1 x7521xra 1 Compound Annul Find Final Final Revised Revised Estimated Growth Census Census Census Population Population Population Role 411 r70 H1140 U1re0 111105 111ili 111197 1990.1997 Tarrant Ca only (Contlnued) Azle 4,493 5622 $068 9300 9.750 9 500 103% Bei 10,049 20821 43762 45900 46,600 47,850 1.33% Benbrook A,169 13.579 13.564 20250 20,550 21,150 1.:6% y. Blue V"nd 1.283 2,169 2133 2400 2,400 2400 176'. Colleyville 3.342 6.700 12724 16200 16750 17,400 4.75'. CnW'ey 2.662 5852 6974 7ISO 7200 .7.300 06a'. Oal.cdNnglon Gardens 757 1.100 115a 2050 2.too 2.100 2671. - EdOecliffWage 1743 2.695 2.715 2,750 2750 2.150 0Ill... E ulasa 19,316 24.002 3817 39,900 40.850 41,300 1.18% fverrran 4,570 5.387 5.i72 5.750 5750 S750 0.209v Foresl Hill a,236 11,684 11 652 11.550 11350 11,670 015% Fon 11 393,455 385,164 447619 473600 477850 484.530 1.16'. Grapevine' 7.049 11,801 29.196 33,100 33.600 3500 289 Hallorr Cry 28,1t27 29,014 32856 33300 33900 34830 006'. Hallett 270 262 795 1,000 1,000 1.050 421% Hunt 27,215 31,420 33574 35.650 36000 36.3M 1.164 Karla, 1,474 4,156 13683 16250 19350 20750 636% Kenneddle 3,076 2,594 4096 4850 5000 5.150 3.15% Ole wo,th 4,95a 4.394 4.591 4.650 4,650 4.651 0.19% Mamneld' 3,655 a.102 15815 19,850 20.800 22.151 532'. N. Ft4hlarW Hills 16,514 30.592 45995 SO 650 $1,550 5255) 20% Pantego 1,779 2,431 2.371 2400 2400 2.400 0.164 Pelican Bay Ni NI 1271 1300 1,450 1500 2 40% Richland Hills 1.865 7977 7,978 6750 a.150 8.300 0.59'. Rwer Oaaa 4193 6 690 a 580 gem 6.600 a.60C 0.04% Sagman 2,362 3736 1551 9,400 10000 10.550 3.18% Sansom Fans 4,771 3 921 3 928 3.900 1900 3900 (011•.) Soumlake' 2031 .2.806 7982 13350 14.950 16650 4370'. Watauga 3.776 10284 20009 21,100 21.350 21 NO 1.21% } I Yleslwanh Village 4.578 3.$51 2350 1,650 1,850 1150 {348'.1 wril. Se6lemenl 17449 13508 15472 15400 15 am 15450 1002'.1 Pemairlder or To,, air C ount4 24,110 29,854 33232 34050 34.300 34.500 0561. SPIT C'nea 1.600 5397 17.$39 21.500 22.100 23930 w111County 19.681 26575 34 E'9 36850 37.550 79.250 1464 Boyd 695 889 1041 1.100 1100 1,100 0821. Bridgepod 3614 3,737 3581 3600 3650 3.650 OPP. Dealer' 3240 4,104 4245 4400 4450 4,550 103% Remainde• of wee County 12.131 17,645 25$12 27,750 28.350 28.950 1.71'. 1 _ r. Nine County Urban Arts 2351,569 2930.545 3$85415 a.215.200 4304 150 4,411.275 1.90•. lCollin.Odlac. Demon Bill , Jvhnw Kalman, Pa,ker, Pockwail, Tarram) NCTCOG Peyton l18 ceunnen 2$04442 3119,806 Ulf 75) 11050.300 4,542.140 4,x54,325 1654 a 1D90popufalron bra'! nave ben onK;e7fy cn4nyed 8Y nil Cannes Sumau. 4 ' n SPLIT CITY TOTAL S Added to split Cllles Populatlae Added to split clues Populalten Added to SPIN CHINA Population • CDIllncDuElty Dallas 42,11 De11t91Lcounly Dallas 11,671 writeLL gu* 011111 1 1 Richardson 14,996 Frisco 1,400 64491 1 Secuts 631 seuthreke 401 - Florae Call 169 Plano 1,316 Peron 44110111 Asia 1444 Garland 15 Ceppell 6 Mineral wens 21 Fan Worth 7 ~ I Delta) County Canonton 44,117 BopkweUSOUnty Powlen 1,3611 Combinl 449 E1611auide Glenn Helghis 934 colas 76 Grapevine 6 mansnold 156 wrile 177 • lswlavllle 1550 Ceder Hill 54 ovals 304 Gral4 Prairie 4 IlmnL4iii larloean 2,090 @ @ Wylie 117 Grand Prairie 22,0» d9mean Cauaty Nansnetd 341 For technical quo aeons, Contact lloclry oardlnar, Raearch and Inlorfivi lon slrwv'L NCT000r Teamster Capita of this end otn o COG puhlitaeods, Contact Atka Tole, Oeptond klimmatbn Corner, NCT000, 411 all Flaps Drive, lulls V4, P.O. Box s11, Arlington, Texas 71006-611, (81 71 16-11 40. L ! 1, J!'fir•'1 4 I K. 32 X I r II A/foae0~ • G Ile I Tall" ~I ( - - -t- ; Top I I y , Ten Cities I j Denton County ur,t.w Collin County - Flower Mound r~ r--- I I Orand P Irle--•. I t 1 _ AM I \ l Tarrant County I Dallas County 1 Share of Top 10 Cities Regional Growth 50% Remaining 126 Cities 'Grand Pralrle and McKinney led for 10th f Population Estimates Methodology: NCTCOG s por lation estimates are based on current housing conjunction with building permit data to produce city level inventories for each city In the NCTCOG region with a population population estimates. Final population for January 1, 1996 also of 1,000 or more. The figures are reviewed at the regional level for Includes estimates of persons living In group quavers (nursing consistency with other indicators of regional population such as homes, dormitories, etc ) All figures are reviewed by each city labor force estimates and vital statistics, prior to publication. County level estimates are edJusled for cities that are in more than one county. Remainder of county totals are 0 Cities complete A building permit form that provides NCTCOG estimated based upon secondary, resources and have been with Information on building completions, demolitions, annexations adjusted to reflect annexalions. and other changes in housing stock that occurred throughout the prior year, The reported housing units by type (single family, multi Revised population estimates require prior year adjustments family. ether) are Added to the 1990 Census housing stock figures through methodological changes to ensure consistency. The to develop estimates of current year housing stock. Persons per compound annual growth column provides A convenient Indicalor household figures and occupancy rates were adjusted slightly in of the annual growth rate to, each city and county from 1990 to order to account for regional and local trends observed from the current year, comparable to a compound Interest rate. secondary data sources and surveys. These rates were used in ,er tf~ :)5 , 10 32x10 ~,t momom mass 01.!uc r011 f1' tln 1 In C SI 1~~ 4~~-A4{'fI a 'a~~'.. .1 ) ! t.CJZ la J~nr t r rr,n. q✓~) I W B ~y "1' { if \ i 1'I° ./A n I a~ I' i . t,Y $ P r r )l Iti°~ rYr;~t I t r l +ti I x r I Y of n .5S ';r t t N}1 r 1'.I n t m ♦;~~ry 'bq I ) a t III . 1 r r 'I 1 -il r r o r ) r { 1 a r 1' v ~ '0'~ r J n I. d ' 5~ I-) r' r w e~~~r I ~ t n. , I 1 4 , 1. a al ✓ I n. I l n. ° n r ; F. t; t r r A t r ,I• a a !ea=MN - f .1 r r { % n i ax.k •~r t .I { t~ ~ . ut ra ti's L ~ ! ~ ~ 1 Y r , i~ Map of the North Central Texas Region (All Cities over 1,000) i Was Denton I ft. Collin •l`"'~+' ~ •pY11Y .In.l~ •ay.Ywl .WIY .R4~aq •Fanaba ' y~y .4Y OIIY •IN.. .Nrkn .aw,Y 'tall •VI01`OwY, OI. '.y. .FY. .tiV .will •Cas Wb tYr Y.iwlCMlw~aNM .lbnll , n.am MN151Ya NNY ~ Il~atgwn• NW• YMY11. b1aY }(II,Y NY. .lra.,y wa..• a°Yaid Muni YiwYFW. IiaM•f' NYan'y~ I,,~ItVIFY M •1°P W1nY• warOM~4IalwlaMaTn N'1'MMI M1F •al~ aYMM. d4 'aae• IM~I/ • M1M'F~lla CsIMtIC ~T '~"N .}x.,11 M wbYr1 j~f vim, OaYYY,IY OIra.aN'w .al+l Flue tI~M.,~.~W.r o - ~ .w~~F/YI1a lafall111 ° ,"Kra, N~Ny~'~ ~l Y4 'fYMM 6YM/ ) Parker Tenant D Ne <wrY '",rTa" , Palo Plnto Hood Johnson 't""" •NIa •1`"'' n 7. Efalh awn.w..r. •NaaYlr'wYar Kaufman ar f t « ' £r, aw,w. Ellls + .a.pY+a Somor Somennll rlln, twlCw. I 1 b. Navarro I % North Central Texas Council of Ooverrveents U.S. SUN Rate Centerpolnl Two, 616 Six Flaps 00ve PAID ANnBe 586 Arlington, Texas Permn 00 gtoon, TX 616.5686 a i i n 0.1 ~I, nt I ~ r 17 r, , x 32 X I O r.l u yr ~ , ~ Y i lY A .rt.. ,r a I I ~ I~r ~j, } 4 1 hl. ~ I4 y ~ l~ I l.'.p ~ °I a1 I y t y~ ~I y +v I J , , ~ e , r r t r S\ Y.~ 1 b .r ~ y y I r 4 Or , i i"' r .V "I ~ S r E t~ I I • r'iF + i i fn ) h r 1.:.11 l ~ I. r11. ,y l F l r I . I City of Denton Demographic Statisitics 1960.1998 Year Population Percent School Percent Unemployment Size In Acres Slae In Sq Mlles Increaea o Enrollment Increase School Rats M ofJan•1 As olJart•1 1960 26,844 NIA NIA N/A 5952 9.30 1970 39871 32878 NIA NIA NIA 18217.22 28AS 1980 48,063 17.038 NIA NIA NIA 21833.53 33.80 1988 65.623 26,759 10186 6.2 33185.14 $1.85 1989 66,011 0.588 10,276 0.925 7.5 33250.39 52.00 1990 66,27D 0391 10,690 3136 5,4 33550.29 52.42 1991 66,47D 0.301 10,060 2.409 7.5 33550.29 52.42 1992 66.902 0.646 11.233 2.430 7.1 34917.29 54.56 1993 67.422 0.771 11.650 3.579 8.2 34040,35 54,59 1994 _ 68,650 1.789 11800 1.271 8 34967.45 54;04 1995 69,550 1.294 12,100 2.479 4.9 35047,14 54.78 1998 70,450 1,278 12,512 3.293 305 35248.61 86.07 1997 71,450 1.400 12,777 2.074 3.5 35438.33 6S,37 } 1998 73,050 2.190 NIA NIA NIA 35133.67 $5.63 0 Populnfbn Fpunt hx l9B0,1170, l98D, I J. S. 9umou cf Csnsut Popufetlan Flpurst for olheryeerv N" CO*W Terar Counotof OovsmmMlt =OOF Demographic Qulckle.xis 4113!98 25P110 32 O