Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-09-1998
{ ~rsr , O I a#.xtaw I City Council Agenda Packet June 9,1998 i VIA Y Y ~LL 3 2x' 0 0 AGENDA Appnda No0 - - CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL kgenda Item __~a~ June 9, 1998 Date After determining that a quorum is present and convening in an open meeting, the City Council will convene in a closed meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 9, 1998 at ; :15 p.m. in the Council Work Session Room at City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: 1. Closed Meeting: A. Consultation with Atiomcy-Under TEX• uOV'T• CODE Sec. 551.071 1. Meet with City Attorney to consider strategy, discuss status, mediation and settlement of litigation styled Denton County Historical Museum, Inc. v. Denton County, et at., Cause No. GC-98-00098-C filed in the Probate Court of Denton County, including, but not limited to issues related to allegations of breach of contract and owtncrship of artifacts. 2. Meet with City Attorney to consider strategy, hiring of outside counsel, and discuss possible conflict of interest matters in litigation styled Edward Soph, Carol Soph, Dale Branum, Citizens for Health), Growth, and Joyce A. Poole v. City of Denton Zoning Board of Adjustment, Cause No. 98- 10388.16, filed in the 161' District Court of Denton County, a petition for wTit of certiorari seeking a reversal of the Denton Zoning Board of Adjustment's action in the United Copper Industries, Inc, appeal. B, Conference with Employees - Under TEX. GOVT. CODE Sec. 551.075. The Council may receive information from employees during a staff conference or briefing, but may not deliberate during the conference. ANN' FINAL ACTION, DECISION, OR VOTE ON A MATTER DELIBERATED IN A CLOSED MEETING OR ON INFORMATION RECEIVED IN A CONFERENCE WITH EMPLOYEES WILL ONLY BE TAKEN IN AN OPEN MEETING THAT IS HELD IN C'ONIPLIANCE WITH TEX. GOVT. CODE CH. 551• THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES ThE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO A CLOSED MEETING OR EXECUTIVE SESSION AS m AUTHORIZED BY TEX. GOV'T. CODE SEC 551.001, ET SEQ. (TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT) ON ANY ITEM ON ITS OPEN MEETING AGENDA OR TO RECONVENE IN A ' • CONTINUATION OF THE CLOSED NTEF.TING ON THE CLOSED MEETING ITEMS NO-FED ABOVE, IN ACCORDANCE N~1111 THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, INCLUDING, WI FHOUT LIMITATION SECTIONS 551.071.551,085 OF THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT. Special Called Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on TuesCr.y, June 9, 1998 at 6:00 • p.m. in the Council Work Session Room at City hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which 0 • I the following items will be considered: +M.' K 32X Q 0 tD 1 F City of Denton City Council Agenda June 9, 1998 Page 2 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the settlement of litigation styled Denton County historical Museum, Inc, v. Denton County, Texas and the City of Denton, Texas, et at, Cause No. GC-98.00098•C filed in the probate Court of Denton County; authorizing and ' ratifying the Mayor's execution of the Settlement Agreement dated June 4, 1998; authorizing the City Manager and the City Attorney to act on the City's behalf in executing any and all documents and to take other actions necessary to finalize the settlement and release of claims. 2. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the retention of Terry Morgan & Associates (Morgan) to provide a defense for the City of Denton Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) and such other legal support required by the City of Denton in Cause No. 98.10388.16 in which the plaintifrs are Edward Soph, Carol Soph, Uale Branum, Citizens for Healthy Growth, and Joyce A. Poole, 3. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing settlement of a roof damage claim and authorizing the City Manager to accept the settlement and to execute a partial release of claims in return for payment of General Accident Insurance Company for roof damage by the contractor on the City Hall renovation contract, Following the completion of the Special Called Session, the Council will convene into a Work Session at which the following items will be considered: NOTE: A Work Session is used to explore matters of interest to one or more City Council Members or the City Manager for the purpose of giving staff direction into whether or not such matters should be placed on a future regular or special meeting of the Council for citizen input, City Council deliberation and formal City action. At a Work Session, the City Con;fcil generally receives informal and preliminary reports and information from City staff, 6liclals, members of City committees, and the individual or organization proposing council action, if invited by City Council or City Manager to participate in Vic session. Participation by individuals and members of organizations invited to speak ceases when the Mayor announces the session is being closed to public input, Although Work Sessions are public meetings, and citizens have a legal right to attend, they are not public hearings, so citizens are not allowed to participate in the session unless invited to do so by the Mayor. Any citizen may supply to the City Council, prior to the . f beginning of the session, a written report regarding the citizen's opinion on the matter being explored, Should the Council direct the matter be placed on a regular meeting agenda, the staff O will generally prepare a final report deftninS the proposed action, which will be made available to all citizens prior to the regular meeting at which citizen input is sought. The purpose of this procedure is to allow citizens attending the regular meeting the opportunity to hear the views of 1 their fellow citizens without having to attend two meetings. 1 1 Presentation of Denton Municipal Electric's State Championship lineman rodeo teams. 2. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding Phase I Impact Fees and 10-year Capital Improvement Plan from the consultant, Duncan Associates. r 25 32 x ❑ 4 n - ]e1HI7E1 City of Denton City Council Agenda June 9, 1998 Page 3 II 3. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction concerning Residential Solid Waste automated collection and a public/private partnership to develop a Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). 4. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding an update of the City of Denton Workforce Diversity Plan (FY 1997/98 to 2001/02). 5. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the 1998.2003 Capital Improvement Program as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. I 6. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff regarding the interim Corridor Ordinance. I 7. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding public comments received during the Alternative Development Scenarios public meetings. 8. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding cable television rates. (The Cable Television Advisory Board recommends approval of C2 Consulting's recommended maximum permitted rates (6-0) on May 27, 1998) 9. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the results of the supplemental budget priority questionnaire with City Council CERTIFICATE I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the __day of , 1998 at o'clock (a.m) (p m) CITY SECRETARY • NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION ROOM 1S { ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT • LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. • • PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 349.8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1.800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. ~.r, 10 32 X ID 0 anloa O araer~« , ` Agenda Na ~g o )-2, Agenda Ite Date i Date ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AUTHORIZING SETTLEMENT OF LITIGATION STYLED DF.NTON COUNTS' HISTORICAL AIUSEUAI, INC. 1'. DENTON COUNTY, TEUS AND CITY OF DENTON, TF.,> AS, FT .4L, CAUSE NO. GC-98-00098-C FILED IN THE PROBATE COURT OF DENTON COUNTY; AUTHORIZING AND; RATIFYING I HE MAYORS' EXECUTION OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 4,1999; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY TO ACT ON THE CITY'S BEHALF IN EXECUTING ANN' AND ALL DOCUMENTS AND TO TAKE OTHER ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FINALIZE THE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS f SECTION I: That certain Settlement Agreement dated June 4, 1998 settling the litigation styled Denton Count 'v Historical Aluseurn, Inc. v Denton Coun{v, Texas and the Ciq. of Denton, Texas, et al, Cause No. GC-98.06098-C in the Probate Court of Denton County is hereby approved and the Mayors execution of said agreement is hereby authorized, ratified and approved The City Manager and'or the City Attomey arc hereby authorized to execute orders releasing and dismissing all claims and all other documents in a form approved by the City Attorney and to take all other actions necessary to finalize the Settlenteot Agreement. SECTION 11, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval PASSED AND APPROVED this the. Jay of ---,1998 JACK MILLER, MAYOR 't ATTEST: j • JENNIFER WALTERS, SECRETARY i PY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL, FORM, HERBERT L. PROUTY, CI1 N' ATTORNF:N' FSIMIDUCPI"I!iLdlur NKunxnIK I oploon,Aluwum Afu,cum SCm1wK,n Urdd,% ~5 S r ~~r co yy~ 2~i x 32 01 o ' 0 n i i I q hqeda No ~gtda Itenj Date ORDINANCE N0. , I , I AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE RETENTION OF TERRY MORGAN & ASSOCIATES (MORGAN) TO PROVIDE A DEFENSE FOR THE CITY OF DENTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (ZBA) AND SUCH OTHER LEGAL SUPPORT REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF DENTON IN CAUSE NO. 98.10388-16 IN WHICH THE PLAINTIFFS ARE EDWARD SOPH, CAROL SOPII, DALE BRANUM, CITIZENS FOR HEALTHY GROWTH, AND JOYCE A. POOLE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, a document entitled "Petition for Writ of Certiorari" was filed on June 1, 1998 with the 16u' District Court in Cause No. 98.10388.16 styled Edward Soph, Ca of Sonh. Dale Branum, Citizens for Healthy Grog v h City of Denton Zoning Board-QfAdjustment, and %%IILREAS, the allegations in such petition relate to thu ZBA upholding the decision of the City's Director of Planning and Development regarding, but not limited to, the issuance of a building permit to United Copper for the construction of a rod mill in an area zoned for Light Industrial uses; and WHEREAS, Morgan provided the legal support to the ZBA in conducting the hearing appealing the administrative decision of Dave Hill and such Arm is under contract with the City to provide legal support to the City in matters relating to planning and zoning matters; and WHEREAS, the City and Morgan desire to amend their existing contract to provide the legal services needed by the ZBA and the City in preparing a defense to the allegations raised in the matters referenced above; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: A STIO,y II That the contract batween the City of Denton and Terry Morgan & • Associates is hereby amended to provide legal services necessary to prepare a defense for the t City of Denton Zoning Board of Adjustment and such other legal support needed by the City of Denton in Cause No. 98.10388.16 in which the Plaintiffs are Edward Soph, Carol Soph, Dale Branum, Citizens for Healthy Growth, and Joyce Poole SECTION L That the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute the • amendment to the above contract necessary to effectuate this retention and the legal expe ises 0 • authorized herein shall be paid from the City's Risk Fund. 5ECII Ill That this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and approval r. t 25 10 32 X I O } O i t 1 ~ PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1998. JACK MILLER, MAYOR ATTEST: i JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTOKNEY , I i , , l ' 4 r r„ a[..:~r I f [ r z .~ya7 , 14 °r 2 it a 1, t a. 10 32dil 0 j r agenda I~te~m/ 56 3 ORDINANC F NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING SE11LESIENi OF A CITY HALL ROOF DAMAGE CLAIM; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER '10 ACCEPT THE SETTLEMENT AND TO EXECUTE A PAIRTIAL RELEASE OF CLAMS IN RETURN FOR PAYMENT BY GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY FOR ROOF DAMAGE BY THE CONTRACTOR ON THE CITY HALL RENOVATION CONTRACT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, during the process of construction of the first phase of renovation of the City Hall under the Contract with the general contractor Furstenberg Constriction Company, Inc. ("Furstenberg") dated January 22, 1997, the roof outside the Council Chambers was damaged; and WHEREAS, the City made a claim under the Contract against the contractor, and the contractor and the City have agreed to settle the claim for payment of twenty five thousand nine hundred dollars ($25,900) by Fursienberg's insurer. General Accident Insurance Company, in return for the City releasing all claims growing out of this incident, while preserving other claims and rights under the Contract; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the public interest to approve the settlement of this claim; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HF.RLBY ORDAINS: SECTION -L That, in consideration of the payment by General Accident Insurance Company of twenty five thousand nine hundred doila s (S25,900), the settlement is hereby approved. The City Manager is hereby authorized to cveeute the attached release of claims in a form approved by the City Attorney, releasing F'urslenberg Construction Company, Inc. and various other parties from all claims growing out of the incident that caused the roof damage oc'.side the City Council C"hambcrs, white preserving any other claims, rights, and remedies the , m have under the Construction Contract and contract documents Hith Furstenber City may f3 , Construction Company, Inc. SEC] ION 11. That this ordinance shall becowc effective immediately upon its passage i and approval PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of1999. i~ • ! 11': K \IILLE•'R, MAYOR _ k ~.J • r 75D ID 0 0 I 1 ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: IIERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY ; A~ ti BY: : 1 n, ~ 111ir l..iiv il, (Nil'. i'Y.1, it ~7.t,l Ml In (f.tl[.nI In.I A( " 1 l.. ' " Page 2 t !e Ml:~ 25 I0 32XIo i s , . 0 ~I • I Agenda Nn .2- Ap^nda 11 tfin_ Date_SL~~ I CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS Memorandum TO: Mayor and Members of City Counci I FROM: Howard Martin, Assistant City Manager/Utilities DATE: June S, 1998 SUBJECT: Texas Lineman's Rodeo On Saturday, May 30, 1998, the Third Annual Texas Lineman's Rodeo sponsored by the Engineering Extension Service if Texas A&M was held. Nineteen linemen teams representing investor-owned, co-op, contractor, and municipal utilities across the state of Texas competed. Denton Municipal Electric was represented by two journeyman and two apprentice teams. Events in which the journeyman teams competed were pole climb with egg, hurt man rescue, lighting arrestor change-out, underground cable splice, rope splice, and first-aid/controlled bleeding. Events in which the apprentices competed were pole climb with egg, hurt man rescue, first-aid/controlled bleeding, rope splice, and a written test. The Denton teams placed as follows: Journeyman Team #1 - Craig Mankin, Brad Watts, Tim Kutas First Place Municipal Division Third Place All Divisions First Place First-Aid Third Place Pole Climb with Egg - Craig Mankin Journeyman Team 42 - Wes Gideon, Rowdy Patterson, JR Richardson Second Place Municipal Division • Apprentice #1 -Matt Warschun First Place All Divisions First Place Rope Splice First Place Written Test Third Place Hurt-man Rescue • Third Place Pole Climb with Egg Apprentice #2 - Kevin Strickland First Place Pole Climb with Egg First Place First Aid "veJ,, fPd lu &,Aty Ser, ea" 25 x 32 x Q wry O War" A~rnda N a_ g O,L,L Agenda Item e, AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET Oats""`7._ AGENDA DATF.: Junc 9, 1998 DEPARTMENT: Utility Administration ACM: Iloward Martin, 349-8232 lye SUBJECT RECEIVE A REPORT, HOLD A DISCUSSION AND OWE STAFF DIRECTION REGARDING PFIASF I IMPACT FEES AND 10-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FROM THE CONSULTANT DUNCAN ASSOCIATES, IIACKGRO I, James 13, Duncan of Duncan Associates will present the preliminary results of the first phase of the water and wastewater impact fee study, I his first phase covers only the cost associated with raw water supplies, centralized water ,Iorage, production and treatment d facilities and wastewater treatment facilities. The second phase will cover water transmission and distribution and wastewater collection facilities, and will be based on the preferred development scenario resulting from the comprehensive plar ning effort. Duncan Associates has used the land Use Assumptions rccommendou by the Capital Impruvcments Ads isory Committee to develop a 10-year Capital linr:ovemcnts Program and the impact fees. A copy of the 10-year CIP is attached as Exhibit 11. Thn consultant team will brief the Council on the contents of the I0-year C111, the methodology for calculating the impact fee and the drill impact fee. Depending on public input and City Council recommendations, the preliminary impact fee results will lie adjusted. F MMATED 5C'IIEDU E OF PROJE See Exhibit I "Impact Fee Schedule PRIOR ACTIO,_/ RE 'IrW fCoune I Ilo rd & Is o s Council briefing on process considerations for enacting impact fees- October 28, 1997. 1 Council briefing on the comprehensive plan- December 16, 1997. Council briefing on impact fees- January 13, 1998. TJ Council approval of Professional Services Agreements for impact fees implementation, February 17. 1998, j t , 25~~C1 32x , ,u•r,a ,td .79?`',t I.. ;S:< fb'"I$.~^w Y..a":. 4C ~~X`'^: "'NkI)V? FV lbf./.tiayvuxtz ~rm..d.. . T. u... .i qI S tpl i Council approval of ordinance creating the Denton Capital Improvements Advisory R 1 Committee, March 17, 1998. ! Council approval of ordinance to set a hca: ing date on Land Use Assumptions, April 21, } 1998. Council approval of Public Hearing on'~and Use Assumptions on June 2, 1998. f FISCAL INFORMATION a " None Respectfully submitted: Director Water Utilities I 1 } y F Exhibit I Impact Fee Schedule Exhibit 11 Preliminary 10-Year C IP and Impact Fee i n; s 41 ~ ,'I rr i Y ~ ~k 10 32x ~ p r .fir} hDact Fee Schedule Task Dates Assuming that we base Land Use Assumptions on Market Forecasts Council appoints Adv Board 17-Mar Rust briefs Council and Adv Board on 24-Mar market forecasts Rust modifies forecasts as appropria;o 3125-4115 I: Council sets hearing date 21-Apr Adv Board recommends land use 22-Apr f,r assumptions Mandawry 30-60 day public review 4122.612 Council holds public hearing 2-Jun Council adopts land use assumptions 16-Jun AGTIDuncan reviews existing plant info 3118.4110 AGT1Duncan prepares 10-yr CIP 4113-5131 PUB review 1-Jun City Cc in it review 9-Jun Adv Board review 24-Jun AGT1Duncan modify 10•yr CIP 6/12.7124 t Council sets hearing date 4-Aug j Adv Board sends comments on CIP 12-Aug 0 Mandatory 30-60 day comment period 815-9115 Council holds public hearing 15-Sep I Council adopts fees 10*96 I EXHIBIT i :m~$~afy=: r` 2~i Cl 32 x I ❑ 0 { C*va JmfL nwmencr pan for I WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES aroa7an~ rh<c~d DENTON, TEXAS S DUNCAN ASSOCIATES P, rpared by m asematoi with ArM.IED GEOGIIAPMC TECHNOLOGIES ALAN PLL* M Pt ASSOCIATES • may I w 0 0 I i 01 EXHIBIT 11 • O TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 E LEGAL FRAMEWORK 2 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ..........................................................2 SERVICE AREAS ..................................................................3 SERVICE UNITS ...................................................................7 12 DEMAND PROJECTIONS . CAPITAL COSTS .................................................................15 Water Treatment 15 Water Supply 16 Wastewater T eatment 18 20 0187 SERVICE CREDITS NET COST SCHEDULE 23 i TABLES j I Table I: Population Growth, 1970.1997 1 Table 1: Potential Single-Family Fees . , . 1 Table 2: Population of Water/Wastewater Service Areas 4 Table 3: Meter Equivalency Factors 8 Table 4: Water Service Units, 1998 . 8 9 Table 5: Wastewater Service Units, 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 6: Water and Wastewater Service Area Populations, 1988.2009 10 Table 7: Population per Service Unit . 11 Table 8: Water and Wastewater Service Units, 19992009 11 Table 9: Water Demand per Capita, 1988.1997 12 Table 10: Wastewater Demand per Capita, 19881997 13 Table 11: Peak and Average Water Demand, 1999.2009 13 Table 12: Wastewater Demand, 1999.2009 14 Table 13: Water Treatment/Pumping/Storage Costs, 1999.2009 Table 14: Lake Ray Roberts Cost . . 17 Table 15: Water Supply Costs, 1999.2009 18 Table 16: Existing Wastewater Plant Cost 18 Table 17: Wastewater Treatment Costs, 1999-1009 . . 19 Table 18: Water Treatment Debt Service Credit 20 Table 19: Water Supply Debt Service Credit , , . 21 0 Table 20: Wastewater Debt Service Credit . . . 22 Table 21: Water and Wastewater Net Cost per Service Unit , 23 Table 22: Water and Wastewater Net Cost by Meter Site . . . 23 a~ 32xi El 0 x INTROF3UCTION Denton has experienced significant growth in recent years. The City's population has grown by about two percent annually since 1970. Denton County has grown significantly faster than the state average, and was the fastest growing county in Texas during the 1980s. Table S POPULATION GROWTH, 1970.1997 CRY of DeaL Slow of Donlon Coun:a Texas 1970 Population (Census, 411/70) 39,874 75,633 11,198,665 1980 Populati on (Census, 411/80) 48,063 143,126 14,229,191 1990 Population (Census, 411190) 66,270 273,525 16,986,335 1996 Population (Estimate,7/1/96! 74,645 350,905 19,128,261 Annual Growth Rate, 1970-80 2.1% 8.9% 21% Annual Growth A at&, 1990-90 3.6% 9.1% 1,9% Annual Growth Rate, 1990.96 2.1% 4.7% 2.1% $1M r Texas State Data Center (growth rates are uncompounded). I The City of Denton does not currently charge water or wastewater Impact fees. This Capital Improvements Plan has been developed according to the requirements of State law to be used as the basis for the preparation of impact fee ordinances for water and wastewater facilities. It identifies the capital Improvements that will be required during the ten-year period from 1999 to 2009, and determines the portion of the costs of those facilities that are attributable to growth over the planning period. The water and wastewater impact fees are being developed in phases in order to get some impact fees in place before the end of the year. This first phase covers only the costs asre ciateui with centralized water supply, treatment and storage facilities and wastewater treatmor ilities. The second phase will cover water transmission and distribution and wastewate section facilities, and will be based on the preferred development scenario resultirg rm the comprehensive planning effort. The maximum potential fees for new single•famib . {ter and wastewater customers are as follows. Table 1 POTENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY FEES Maximum Water Supply, TrestmenvStorege Impact Fee 52,044 Maximum Wastewater Treatment Impact Fee $554_ S Total $2,598 S M TeNe 21. City of l0e,ntoNWator s.,d Wastewater Impact Fee CIP 5/28198 Page I 00 r' ~5 k 32XI❑ Y a , arNerwr 0 LEGAL FRAMEWORK Impact fees must be developed in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. The state law lays out very specific requirements for the technical development of these fees as well as the procedures necessary for enactrnent of such fee programs. A key provision of the Impact fee act is that lots that were platted prior to the adoption of the impact fee ordinance are exempt from payment of the fees for one year. No impact fee may be assessed on the application for a building permit or water or wastewater connection for such a lot within the first year of impact fee adoption. Given this 12-month grace period, there is generally no need for additional provisions to phase the impact fees in gradually over time, Another significant provision of Chapter 395 is that the impact fee schedule that is in effect at the time a lot is platted is the one that applies to the property, regardless of when development occurs. This occurs through a process called "assessment." Assessment must occur a, tho time of plat recording, or, for property already platted or not required to be platted, at the time of development approval or building permit, whichever occurs first, Essentially, impact fee assessment simply locks in the fee schedule In place at the time assessment occurs. Any subsequent revision to the Impact fee schedules does not affect the Impact fees owed for the development, The statute makes clear that no action by the local government is required to lock in the fee schedule. ' While state law also allows collection of impact feesat time of plat recording, mostcommunities impose water and wastewater impact fees at time of connection to the utility system. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS "Land Use Assumptions" is the term used in Chapter 395 to refer to growth projections. It is defined as a "description of the service area and projections of changes in land uses, densities, intensities and population in the service area over at least a 10-year period." The purpose of the land Use Assumptions is to project the demand for capital improvements that will be needed to serve anticipated growth. • While Land Use Assumptions are important for facility planning, this does not mean that they will necessarily have a strong relationship to the impact fee levels themselves (I.e., the impact fee per dwelling unit). Denton's water and wastewater impact fee levels will be primarily determined by utility demand statistics, the cost to provide a unit of capacity and the amount of outstanding debt. Consequently, the impact fee level will, In general, be unaffected by the . rate of growth implied by the Land Use Assumptions or by the number of new facilities that must be built to accommodate anticipated growth. If the Land Use Assumptions prove to be p 0 overly optimistic, some facilities included in the Capital Improvements Plan will turn out to be unnecessary and can be deferred until a later date, while if the growth rate is higher than expected, additional facilities will need to be added. Adding or subtracting facilities from the City of DontorVWater and Wastewater Impact Fog V? 5128/98 r Pape 2 ~r 4C1 32 x0 Now 0 Capital Improvements Plan may change the average cost per unit of capacity slightly, but is unlikely to change it significantly. Thus, while the land Use Assumptions should be as accurate as reasonably possible in order to support sound facility planning, it should be understood that they will have little effect on the impact fee schedules themselves. The Land Use Assumptions must cover at least a 10-year period. The Capital Improvements Plan on which the impact fees are calculated must contain the projected demand for capital facilities required over a period not to exceed ten years. Since the two must be compatible, both the land Use Assumptions and the Capital Improvements Plan should cover a 10-year period. The Act requires that the public notice for the land Use Assumptions include "an easily understandable map of the service area to which the land use assumptions apply." A document meeting the above requirements, Lard Use Assumptions, was completed in April 1398 and was recommended for adoption by the Denton Capital Improvements Advisory Committee on April 22, 1998, The City Council held a public hearing on the Land Use Assumptions on June 2, 1998 and is scheduled to adopt them on June 16, 1998. The report contains 1999-2009 projections for population, dwelling units, nonresidential square footage, residential densities and nonresidential Intensities for the City's water and wastewater service areas. SERVICE AREAS Chapter 395 lays down a number of requirements regarding service areas. The Land Use Assumptions must be prepared for each service area. The Capital Improvements Plan, in turn, must include a description of the capital improvements and costs for each service area, based on the approved Land Use Assumptions. Finally, impact fees collected from development within a service area must be spent with the same service area. The Texas impact fee enabling act, in Sec. 395.0}1(91, defines "service area" as: the area within the corporate boundaries or extraterritorial Jurisdiction of the political subdivision to be served by the capital Improvements or facilities expansions specified in the capital Improvements plan.... The service area, for * the purposes of this chapter, may include all or part of the land within the political subdivision or Its extrolerritorial )urisdiction. The City has considerable discretion In the designation of service areas within its jurisdiction. As a general rule, the fewer the number of service areas, the better. Since funds collected from . a service area must be spent within the same service area, the creation of a large number of small service areas will restrict the flexibility of spending impact fee revenues and may make it p difficult accumulate sufficient funds in some service areas within the five years allowed by law to spend them. The state statute specifically authorizes "systemwide" land use assumptions for water and wastewater facilities. City of OentomWalar and Wastewater Impact Fee CIP 5/28/99 r r Pape 3 08 32 Io Mai % nnrnna t r ° e .roasts ' , + The service areas are required to be delineated in the Land Use Assumptions that are adopted as a prerequisite for development of the Capital Improvements Plan and impact tee ordinance. The City Council is scheduled to consider adoption of Land Use Assumptions for the water and wastewater impact fees on June 16, 1998. The document identifies the City's CCN service areas for water and wastewater as the respective Impact fee service areas for those facilities. A CCN is a "Certificate of Convenience and Necessity" that must be approved by the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC) before services may be provided to properties within the designated area. I The water and wastewater service areas Include all of the area within the City of Denton, plus different areas of the City's Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The Wastewater service area includes all of the area within the Water service area, plus and additional area that is in the 1 City's wastewater CCN but not In its water CCN. The service areas are illustrated In Figure 1: Water Service Area and Figure 2: Wastewater Service Area. The Land Use Assumptions put J the City's 1997 population at 71,450, somewhat lower than the State Data Center's estimate for 1996 cf 74,645. However, the Land Use Assumptions clearly show that the populations of j the water and wastewater service areas are larger than the population of the city, and that strong growth is anticipated over the next ten years. Table 2 POPULATION OF WATERIWASTEWATER SERVICE AREAS i CRY of water wuttweut Daataa Service Area ServiceA-es 1997 Population 71,450 74,400 60,300 109 Population NA 76,931 65,190 2009 Population NA 121,362 130,967 i•. Annual Growth Rate, 1997.99 NA 3.11% 3.0% j Anncel Growth Rate, 1999-09 NA 5.4% 5.4% ;gkfS~r City of Denton, ll the Assumptions, April 22, 1996 (growth rates era k uneompnurnded), f j 0 r I J~4 City of OentorWWaler and Wastewater Ingect fee CIP 5128/96 , t: 1! 1 Page 4 09 7) K ❑ 32 X10 M NMLMLMILL 0 i Figure 1 r Water Service Area 1 r t r r ~•im r { { s i City p Page 5 I of DenlorvWater and Wastewater Im acl Fee CIP S/28/98 10 a. 32X w j Figure 2 Wastewater Service Area r 1 %4- a r ~ 3w r ; 1 t~ A City of Don tonWate, and Wail ewater Impact Fee CIP 5!28/98 > > Page 6 1l 10 32 X Io 41 7 t tip J eanraaca • O SERVICE UNITS To calculate Impact fees to accordance with Chapter 395, the growth in demand for capital facilities over the planning horizon must be expressed in "service units," which are defined in Sec. 395,001(10) as: o standardized measure of consumption, use, generation, or discharge attributable to an Individual unit of development calculated In accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards for a particular category of capital Improvements or facility expansions. Most typically, service units for water and wastewater utilities are based upon the capacity " attributable to water meters In the utility system. The reason for this is that water meters are physical elements that are under the control of the utility and that limit the maximum capacity demand of various users. The recommended service unit for Denton's water and wastewater impact fees Is the "single- family equivalent" (SFE), which is based on the size of the water meter. An SFE is the water or wastewater demand associated with the smallest water meter used in the system (5/8"x 314"), which is the meter typically used by a single-family resklence. The ratio of each larger meter's capacity to the capacity of the base meter determines the SFE multiplier applied to each larger size meter, Section 395,014(a)(4) of the Texas Impact fee act requires: ...an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a servfce unit to various types of land uses, including residential, commercial, and industrial. Despite this language, water and wastewater impact fees are almost universally charged based on the size of the water meter, irrespective of land use. Table 3 b the recommended equivalency table, showing the capacity of wafer meters of various sit , and the equivalency factors. s ! Pw i J%O ` i City of DentervWeter end Wntewetor Impect Fee CIP V211411 ''i; 1 Page 7 25 10 10 0 I m" Table 3 METER EQUIVALENCY FACTORS I Water Maximum SFEs Meter cap" per Size (ppm) Meter 5111'x 14' 10 1.0 1' 25 2.5 1.1/2' S0 5.0 2' BO BA 3' 160 16.0 4' 250 25.0 6' 500 50.0 8' B00 80.0 10" 1,150 115.0 ur a Maximum continuous duty now rates in gallons per minute for simple and compound meters from American Water Works Association, AWWA Standards C700, C701, C702, C703, Excluding four meters for wholesale customers, the i4y cu'rendy has 17,761 active water connections, with meters ranging In size up to ten Inches In diameter. Based on the recommended equivalency factors, the City currently has 30,630 single-family equivalent water customers, as shown in Table 4. Table 4 WATER SERVICE UNITS, 1998 Meter No, of SFEa/ Size Customers Meter SFEs i 3l4' 15,438 1.0 15,430 1' 830 2.5 2,075 1.1/2" 534 S.0 2,670 2' 760 8.0 6,080 • 3' 127 16.0 2,032 ; { 4' 58 25,0 1,450 6' 9 500 460 B" 4 80.0 320 10 1 115,0 1$5 Total 17,761 30,630 Soures; Number of active nm wholosale water connections by meter size from City of Denton, April 1998; PCs per meta from Table 3. City of Denton/Wster and Wastewater Impact Fee CIP 5/26/98 A 1 s Page 8 R. X 32X , ~aeowru G } saenvs M The City does not have information on the number of wastewater customers by water meter size. However, it does have data on the total number of both water and wastewater customers by customer class. The total number of water and wastewater customers are virtually, Identical However, the 1997 data reveal that the City has more residential wastewater customers than r' water customers, and fewer nonresidential wastewater customers. Because nonresidential customers tend to use larger meters and represent more SFEs, the estimated number of wastewater service units Ls about 5 percent lower than the number of water service units. p Table 5 ; WASTEWATER SERVICE UNITS, 1998 Resideadal Commercial Government Total t A Water Customers, 1997 11,571 2,522 189 17.285 Wastewater Customers, 1997 11,656 2,309 100 _ 17 !65; Ratio of Wasterwater/Weter Customers 1.019 0.416 0.529 0.999 1 _ Total Water SFEa 1996 17,072 12,110 1,118 30,630 Estimated Wastewater SFEa,1998 11,396 11,120 750 29,266 o r Average mnnttdy non-wholesale water end wastewater customers for 1997 from City of Denton, Water Statistics and Wastewater Sratsrks; total water SFEe for 1996 from Table 1; water SFEs by customer class derived tram some source as Table 1. Projections of growth In service units will be based on the population projections contained In n the City's adopted Land Use Assumptions. However, not all residents living In the City's water f ` and wastewater service areas are City utility customers. Some residents rely on individual well water and on-site sewage disposal systems. Consequently, the total population projections from s the Land Use Assumptions must be reduced to estimate service population. The service popu!ations are estimated by assuming, based on the City staffs knowledge of their systems, that about 93 percent of potential water customers and 87 percent of potential wastewater f customers are currently being served, and that these percentages will increase to about 97 percent and 89 percent, respectively, over the next ten years. The resulting estimates and forecasts of water and wastewater service area populations, derived r from the adopted Land Use Assumptions, are shown in Table 6. ,w. City of DantorVW.ter and Wastewater irrpeet Fee CIP W SAO tr t Page 9 a ` cs 2~X ~.~l. k V~~~~ . s sorter 0 A i ' 41r,. Tahb 6 WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA POPULATIONS, 1998-2009 Water Service Area Wastewater Service Area Twat Service Pevmt Total Service Percent Year Population Po ule~ Served Populadoe Popelation Served 1988 57,000 59,400 1966 58,000 60,400 1990 59,300 61,900 1991 60,200 62,900 I 1992 61,200 63,900 1993 62,500 65,400 1994 64,400 67,300 1995 04,900 67,800 1996 65,800 66,800 1997 74,400 68,900 93% 60,300 70,000 87% 1998 76,631 71,100 93% 82,709 72,10 87% r 1999 79,931 73,300 93% 85,190 74,300 87% 2000 81,299 75,200 92% 87,146 76,500 87% 2001 83,738 17,500 93% 90,318 78,800 87% 2001 86,250 79,800 93% 93,090 81,200 67% 2003 90362 67,800 97% 97,774 86,900 89% 2004 95,091 92,200 97% 102,631 91,300 89% 2005 99,845 96,800 97% 107,763 95,900 89% 2006 104,837 101,700 97% 113,151 100,700 69% 2007 110,079 106,800 97% lle,8o9 105,700 89% 2008 115,583 112,100 97% 124,749 111,000 89% 2009 121,382 117,700 97% 130,987 116,500 89% tare Total population from City cfDenton, tandUseAssumptions; service population from Alen Plummer Associates, Phase l lmpacr Fee CIP Schedule, May 28, 1998. j • The 1998 estimates of the total number of water and wastewater service units can be related 1 to the estimated population served in 1998 to derive multipliers to convert population to service units. The multipliers are presented in Table 7. City of Denton/Water and Wastewater Impact Fee CIP 5/26/98 t Pape 10 iJ , 10 32x10 O Table 7 POPULATION PER SERVICE UNIT 1991 Service 1991 Pop! Population SFEe SFE Water 71,100 30,630 2.32 Wastewater 72,150 29,266 2,17 J.ource,1998 service populations from Tably 2; 1998 SFEe from Tables 4 and 5, The state impact fee act, In Sec, 395.014(a)(5(, specifically requires that the Capital Improvements Plan must enumerate, among other things: I ...the total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria,.. This requirement of the Impact fee act is fulfilled by rnultiplyirg the service population in each service area by the populatlorVsetvice unit ratios, as shown in Table 8. Table I WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE UNITS, 1999-2009 Water Service Ares Wastewiter Service Area Service Population/ Service Population/ Year Population SFE SFEe Population SFE SFEe 1999 73,•900 2,32 31,595 14,300 2.17 30,081 2000 75,200 2,32 32,414 16,500 2.11 30,972 -14 2001 17,500 2.32 33,105 78,800 2,47 31,903 2002 79,800 2.32 34,391 81,200 2.47 32,811 2003 87,800 2,32 37,845 86,900 2,47 35,182 2004 92,200 2.32 39,741 91,300 2.41 36,964 2005 96,800 2.32 41,724 95,900 2.47 38,828 2006 101,700 2.32 43,836 100,700 2.41 40,769 2007 108,600 2 32 4034 105,700 2.47 42,794 Mill 112,100 2,32 48,319 111,000 2,47 44,939 e 2009 111700 2,32 50,733 116,500 2.47 41,168 New SFEe, 1999.2009 19,138 11,945 J14 k M Populations shown are service pol from Table 6; population per SFE multipliers from Table 1. City of DentonMaler and Wastewater Impact Fee OIP V28198 t' + Page I I a 1 32 x 1 0 , i i DEMAND PROJECTIONS Figure I PER CAPITA DEMANDS, 1988-191117 Average per capita water and wastewater demands can be determined based on historic ;M system-wide demand in millions of gallons per day (MGD) and the historic service area m - populations presented above. These per capita estimates represent both residential and " nonresidential demand, and are useful for projecting future system requirements, m particularly when no significant shifts of land use io - _ ratios are expected. 21 ° M0 late iM° 1111 Hp tM3 1110 .0°7 IHA 1101 Two types of per capita water demand are -►Pa°awdn +Avg Water +^'J wnhwatar s relevant: water treatment systems are sized to accommodate peak day demand requirements, while water supply facilities are required only to accommodate average daily demand. Wastewater treatment facilities, in contrast, are designed to accommodate average daily f rs during the peak month. Per capita demands over the last ten years are Illustrated in Figure 3 and presenled in the following Tables9 and 10. Based on these data, Alan Plummer Associates has determined that 360 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) should be used to project peak water demand, 180 gpcd should be used to project average water demand and a70 gpcd should be used to project wastewater flows. Table 9 kI WATER DEMAND PER CAPITA, 1089.1991 Total Demand IMGDI Service Per Cephs (gpcdl Year Peak Average Population Peak AraraL~_ 1988 21,12 10,38 57,000 376 182 1989 t8.97 9,24 58,000 327 159 I 1990 2072 1011 59,300 149 115 1991 21.72 9.65 60,200 361 164 1992 11.22 8.91 61,200 281 146 i 1993 22.74 9.90 62,500 364 158 1 1994 feel goo 64,400 292 141 1995 2065 9.12 64,900 309 141 r 1996 22.68 1209 ,65,800 345 1B4 0 1997 2333 10.91 68,900 339 158 0 Assumed for System Demand Prop,diona 360 180 u c Peak day and annual finished water ploductiom (exctuding wholesale use) Irom Alan Plummer Associates, Phase I lmpact too CIP Schedule, May 28,1998; water service mutation from Table 6, City of Denton/Water and Wastewetar Impact Fee CIP 5426198 . i l Pepe 12 , t e> 5 ti o li ,r.aeeer o i Table 10 WASTEWATER DEMAND PER CAPITA, 1988.1917 Td. Demand Service Per Capita Year IMOD) Popaladoe (gpcdl 1988 928 59,400 156 1989 927 60,400 153 1990 9.87 61,900 159 1991 9.44 62,900 150 1992 9A3 63,900 148 1993 9.04 65,400 138 1994 9.30 67,300 136 1995 11.32 61,800 167 1996 10,95 68,800 159 1997 1248 70,000 170 Assumed for Projections 110 o r Average daily wastewater flows during peak month from Alen Plummer Associates, Phase I Impact Fee CIP Schedule, May 29, 1998; wastewater service population from Table 6. Based on these per capita demand assumptions, and the serv ice population projections deTlved from the Land Use Assumptions, systemwide water and wastewater demand projections are shown in the following Tables 11 and 12. Table 11 PEAK AND AVERAGE WATER DEMAND, 1999-2009 Service Pei Caafu logcdl System Demand tMGD1 Yem Population Peak Avg. Peak_ Avg. 1999 73,300 360 160 2639 1319 2000 75,200 360 Igo 21.07 1354 +w 2001 77,500 360 180 21.90 13,95 2002 79,800 360 180 28.73 14 36 2003 81,800 360 180 31.61 15.80 r 2004 92,200 360 180 33.19 16,60 2005 96,800 360 180 34.85 1742 2006 101,700 360 180 36,61 1831 y 2001 106,600 360 160 3845 1922 2008 112,100 360 160 40.36 20.18 2009 117,700 360 160 42,37 21.19 New Demand, 1999 2009 15.96 800 Source; Service population from table 2; per capita demand from Table 9. City of DentonMlater and Wastewater Impact Fee UP 5128198 =r r s + Page 13 0 32 n y ;.ia a , r! ~ 6 ~ 5 % aaeava 0 1' . JV{Op0i11 , , I~ Table 12 WASTEWATER DEMAND, 1999.2009 Per Capita System Service Demand Osmaed Yost Potietalkw loped) (MGO) 1 1994 74,300 170 12.63 2000 76,500 170 13.01 2001 78,800 170 13.40 2002 81,200 170 13.60 2003 88,900 170 14.77 , 2004 91,300 170 15.52 2005 95,900 170 16.30 2006 100,700 170 17.12 2007 105,700 170 17.97 2008 111,000 170 18.87 2009 116,500 170 19.81 New lkmand,1999.2009 7.18 Sourer, Service population from Table 2; per capita demand from TON 10, I It shculd be noted that the system demand projections are based strictly on projected growth in retail utility customers, and do not include demand from wholesale customers. This is because the City's contracts with its wholesale customers allow the City to terminate the k. obligation when it needs the capacity for its retail customers. r i 9 .4 Y N.a Y ~ I City of Denton/Water and Wastewater knpact Fee CIP 5/28AB 1: I Page 14 x. 19 ; i i ;x 25 C 32'x s 0 1 x:arvar f CAPITAL COSTS For all components of the City's water and wastewater systems, there Is some excess capacity that will accommodate a portion of growth demands. But additional facilities are also needed. The calculations in this section allocate the excess capacity in existing systems for use by new development, with the remainder of growth demand being met by new facility capacity. This produces a weighted average cost for new development that acknowledges the fact that new customers will use existing facilities, and will at the same time create a need for additional facilities. The cost estimates presented in this report are based on conceptual design for use in planning and Impact fee computations. As more detailed site information becomes available, an update of the project costs should be made based on detailed site survey and design information. Water Treatment Water treatment facilities are sized to accommodate peak day demands. The existing Spencer Road water treatment plant has a maximum daily capacity of 28.9 MGD. In 1999, the peak day demand Is projected to be 26.39 MGD. Consequently, there are no existing deficiencies In water treatment capacity. On the contrary, the existing plant will have excess capacity of 2 51 MGD. New water customers anticipated over the ten-year period from 1999-2009 will increase the peak day requirement by 15.98 MGD. A portion of this can be met with existing excess capacity, while the remaining 13.47 MGD will need to be met with new plant capacity. i The City has completed preliminary design for a figure 4 new water treatment plant to be located near PEAK WATER DEMAND AND CAPACITY, 1461.20 2 1 Lake Ray Roberts. The Initial construction I phase will be for a plant with 10 MGD capacity. +0 9M99 All of this capacity will be required by projected I growth. The second phase will expand the 19 _.__i owc9_ capacity by an additional 10 MGD, and a 9a - portion of this capacity will also be required by r9 1 ^1c1~~ m. n1wu9 _ projected water customer growth over the 1999• $ Is 2009 period (see Figure 4). :o a -A •x~-- In addition to the new treatment plant, related facility improvements will be needed to convey the raw lake water to the treatment plant and the treated water to the City's water transmission a ion 161 +wr 11114 H9l 1191 1009 r00r 100A Iwo tool system, 'these Include the Hartlee Field Road d • Acw1 oomma t • Booster Pump Station, the High School Booster Pump Station and the 7.2-mile main transmission line from the Lake Ray Roberts plant to the 0 • t city system, Finally, two elevated storage tanks identified as needed in the City's Water W' Distribution System Master Plan are also Included In the first phase water Impact fees (a third i City of Denton Water and Westewetei Impact Fee CIP 5/28196 Page 15 20 •L El 32 X ID now 'aaeranae 1 . 0 -isnearas r 1.0 MG tank for the 900 pressure plane is required for existing conditions and is not eligible for Impact fee consideration}, f The existing and planned capital improvements and costs for water treatment, pumping and storage facilities are summarized in Table 13. About $44 million is attributable to the cost to ` serve new water customers anticipated over the 1999-2009 period, Dividing the eligible cost by the projected number of new water service units results in a cost of $2,278 per service unit. Table 13 WATER TREATMENT/PUMPING/STORAGE COSTS, 199!Q00 Cppsc 1i11t MGD1 Percent Total Needed 1999.2009 Total Cost Eligible Cost ExistinpSpencerRaad WTP 28,90 2.51 8.60% $45,300,000 $3,937,000 Lake Ray Roberts WTP, Phase 1 1000 1000 100,00% $25,000,000 $25,000,000 Lake Ray Roberts WTP, Phase 2 10.00 3.47 34.70% $15,000,000 $51205,DDo Subtotal, Water Treatment 4890 15.98 NA $85,300,000 $34,142,000 Hardee Field Road Boostar Pump Station 16,00 13.47 94.19% $4,500,000 $3,789,1700 High School Booster Pump Station 16.00 13.47 84.19% $6521000 $549,000 Mein Transmission Line from Rey Roberts WTP 44 Do 1347 3061% $4,850,000 $1,485,DD0 Bolster Pump Station Tie In 44,00 1347 3061% $1,400,000 5429,000 University Tank (2.0 MGI NA NA 75,00% $2,750,000 $2,043,000 1.35 @ Loop 88 Tank 11.0 MG) NA NA 100,00% 111, 10,000 $1,140,000 Subtotal, Water Pimping/Storage NA NA NA $15,292,000 39,455,000 Total, Water TreatmenVPumpinOlorapa NA 15,98 43.34% $100,592,000 $43,597,000 New Water Service Units, 1999 2004 _ 19,138 Cost per Service Unit ISFE) 52,218 ur a Improvements and cost estimates from Alan Plummer Associates, Phase IImpact feeCIPSchedule, May28,1998; cost of existing Spencer Road weler treatment plant is depreciated replacement cost based on City of Denton, Paed Assals Depreciation Report, September 30, 1997 and fmpineerinp News-Record Construction Cost Index (curr9nt = March 1998); w I alai p eak w et er c apac4y needed from Table 11; total capacities and percent of Neter tanks attributable to provAh from memo . from P.S. Aurora, P.E., City of Denton Public Works, April 20, i Water Supply The City's water supply comes primarily from water rights in Lake Lewisville and Lake Ray Roberts. The Lewisville Reservoir was constructed by the U.S, Corps of Engineers to hold a total of 436,000 acre feet of conservation storage, of which the City holds the right to 21,000 • i acre feet of storage. Based on a safe yield of 90.2 MGD, the City receives 4,34 MGD in water '19+ rights frcm Lake Lewisville, The City also has rights to its share of treated effluent credits, which are projected to be 0.63 MGD in 1999, for a total of 4.97 MGD. City of Denton/Water end Wastewater Impact Fie CIP 5/211/98 r r Pape 16 2l 32Xd .r • i jEf i The City's remaining water needs are supplied Pigara f` by Lake Ray Roberts. The reservoir was AVERAGE WATER 0EMANDANO SUPPLY, IIM2004 f conshacted by the U.S. Corps of Engineers r0 ',1160 °/0M1"714M50 with the cities of Denton and Dallas being the r+ - local sponsors and responsible (26% and 74% ; 12 respectively) for repaying 50 percent of the rt 00 total cost of $301 million. The City has water rights of 19.8 MGD from this lake plus wastewater effluent credits from Gainesville of r`-- about 0.65 MGD for a total of 20.45 MGD. e _ a ~ The water supply from both lakes L 25.42 ► MGD. Since the City's total average vater ° 1111,09°10 02 1114 1 996 19 90 1000 30 i 02 loci 20 oe Not demand for the year 2009 Is projected to be 21.19 MGD, the City has sufficient water `P0~"d0°""d ♦AanulOemand supply for the planning period (see Figure 5). The total cost to the City for its participation Ir; the construction of lake Ray Roberts is estimated to be about $69 million, excluding interest pAyments. A portion of this cost, however, is for a greenbelt and other recreation facilities, Exclvding recreational costs, the total cost to the City is about $62 million, as summarized in Table A. Table 14 LAKE RAY ROBERTS COST 1997 Capitali2ed Cost $61,105,336 Plus 1989.1996 Principal Payments $1,976,116 Total Principal Cost $69,111,SC1 Percent Water 69,38# Total Water Cost $62,067,000 Sourca: 1997 cep4ohied cost and percent water ham City u} Denton, "Schedute of Wow Storage Rights - Lek#Say Roberts, for } the Year Ended September 30,1997"; principal p"Ma 19891996 • from City of Denton, `Loki Rey Roberts Water Supply Current Payments,' 1997, + As shown in Table 15, about 39 percent of the cult of Lake Ray Roberts is attributable to i growthoverthel999.2009period. Divlding this by the projected number of new water service • • + • ' units results in a cost of $1,269 per service unit. 101 City of Dantorii Water and Wastewater Impact Fee CIP 5128/96 !r 1 r + Page 17 24 o , 4 x, ~C~ 32x 10 0 0 - I I Table 15 WATER SUPPLY COSTS, 1499.2004 Lake Ray Roberts Water Rights (MGDI 19.BD { Lake Ray Roberts Treated Wastewater Credits {MGD) 0,65 Denton Share of Lake Ray Roberta Capacity IMGO) 20.45 Capacity Required for Growth, 1999-2009 (MGD) 8.00 Percent Required for Growth, 1999-2009 39.12% Denton Share of Lake Rey Roberts Cost $62,067,000 Eligible Cost Attributable to Growth, 1999-2009 524,261,000 New Water Service Units, 1999.2009 19,136 Cost per Service Unit {SFE) $1,269 $eurM Denton share of like Rey Roberts capacity from P.S, Aurora, City of Denton, April 20,1998; water supply capacity required for growth from Table 11; Denton share of lake cost from Table 14; new water Sl from Table 8. , Wastewater Treatment In 194, the City completed a $9.5 million expansion of its wastewater treatment plant. The existing wastewater treatment plant has a depreciated replacement cost of about $21 million, as shown in Table 16. The plant Is now designed to treat up to 15 MGD, and is in compliance with all State and Federal discharge permits. With a projected demand In 1999 of 12,63 MGD, the City has no existing capacity deficiencies with regard to wastewater treatment. Table 16 EXISTING WASTEWATER PLANT COST Existing Plant Original Cost $26,690,788 ENR Factor for 1994 1066 Replacement ydue $29,203,000 n Poteent Depreciation 27.7% Depreciated Replacement Cost 121,114,000 ; Source; Original cost jai of 1994 upgradel and percent depreciation from City of Denton, fired llssers Depreciation Report, September 30,1997; ENR fector based on March 1996 Construction Cost Index from fnpineenng News-Record. • 0 City of Dartor0ater and Wastewater Impact Fee CIP 5128/98 Ot tt r Page 16 I El x Fe1Rllr ~ , u t. According to the demand projections presented Fipen 8 earlier, projected growth In wastewater WASTEWATER FLOWS AND CAPACITY, 1988.2009 customers over the 1999.2009 period will increase demand by 7,18 MGD. As a result, new customers over the next ten years will consume the remaining excess capacity In the 1.1.6m c,1Km. re woo ' treatment plant, as well as 80 percent of the ,e o capacity of the planned 6 MGD expansion (see ! , 7 { Figure 6). Dividing the costs of existing and Ie new capacity attributable to projected growth i by the projected growth in wastewater service - e _ units results In a cost of $899 per service unit, e as shown In Table 17. e Ioil It" 1111 1011 091 11 11 Hue Poor 1001 7001 Pool / r froiedW Flows ♦ Actual Flows Table 17 WASTEWATER TREATMENT COSTS, 1999-2009 caoachr fMCDi Percent ' Toul needed 1899.2009 Total Cast EO01ble cast Existing Wastewater lraatmordPlant 1500 2,37 1560% 821,114,000 53,338,000 6 MGD Expansion 8.00 4.81 80.17% 515,000,000 812,028,000 Subtola1,Weslewstar Treatment 21,00 7.18 NA 836,11A,000 815,362,000 I New Wastewater Service Units, 1999 200.1 17,085 , Coal per Service Unit ISFE) $099 JjoL !Improvements,cepecitiuandcostestimatesfromAlanPlurmorAssociates,Phase!impactFee i CIP Schedule, May 28,1998; total capacity needed from Table 12; existing plant cost from Table 18, 1 f t i5 qR/ City of Dant on/Watu and Wastewater knpect Fat CIP BJ2B/9B t r 7 Page 19 24 - ~tJRr rt. Ci, . 10 41 srwmsa 0 UFA" DEBT SERVICE CREDITS New water and wastewater customers will help pay off outstanding debt incurred for existing f facilities through their monthly rates, To avoid requiring new customers to pay Mice for capital f facilities, once through impact fees and again through rate payments, the Impact fees should be reduced to account for debt service payments. In this section, a debt service credit per service unit Is calculated for water treatment (all existing water facilities with the exception of Lake Ray Roberts), water supply (Lake Ray Roberts) and wastewater facilities. Although this phase of the impact fees rovers only the cost of central facilities, it was not possible to determine what portion of outstanding debt was for Improvements to such facilities; consequently, credit was given for all outstanding debt. The methodology used was to divide each year's debt service payment by the projected number of service units in that year to determine an annual credit per service unit. The net present value of the future stream of debt service payments is the debt service credit per service unit. Table 11 WATER TREATMENT DEBT SERVICE CREDIT Year Principal Inlerat Told Water SFEs CredkSFE 1999 $1,329,000 $600,000 $1,929,000 31,595 $61 2000 $1,175,000 $529,000 $1,704,000 32,414 $53 2001 $1,131,000 $472,000 51,601000 33,405 $49 1002 $1,097,000 $419,D00 ST,516,D00 34,397 $44 2003 $1,078,000 $365,000 S1,443,0D0 31,645 $36 2D04 $1,051,0D0 $311,000 51,361,000 39,741 $34 2005 $1,026,000 $258,000 $1,264,000 41,724 $31 2006 $990,000 5206,000 $1,196,000 43,836 $27 2007 116315,000 $158,000 $994,000 46,034 $22 2008 $891,000 $113,000 $1,004,000 48,319 $21 2009 $725,000 511,000 $796,000 50,733 518 -14 2010 $641,000 $36,D00 $671,000 51,741 513 1011 $66,000 $18,000 $86,1100 52,782 $2 2012 $72,000 11114,WD S86,D00 53,838 82 I 2013 575,000 $11,000 $06,000 $4,915 $1 2014 $80,000 SUM $81,000 56,013 $2 2015 586,000 $2,000 $88,000 $7,133 $2 total $12,351,01',J $3,590,000 515,941,000 $418 Net Present Value $321 0 Source:0eblserv+cepayment111`01 ftcludingLolio Ray Roberts, from City of Denton Water Utilities, 1998; water SFE11999.2009 from Table water 1 SFEs 2010-2015 estimated assuming 2% annual growth; net present value based on 5.5% discount rate. CRy of DoontorvWster and Vdastewater Impact Fee CIP 5/28/98 Pape 20 25 25 32x an - - I - I W~ klomomwi%Wo~, s o , i I x Table 19 WATER SUPPLY DEBT SERVICE CRED'T Non- Water Year Principal Interest Total Recreation Me CredOFE 1999 $490,000 $2,012,000 $2,562,000 52,290,000 31,595 $72 2000 $525,000 $2,032,DW $2,557,000 $2,285,000 32,414 $70 2001 11,140,000 $3,704,000 $4,844,000 $4,330,000 33,405 $130 2002 $1,415,000 13,628,000 $5,043,000 34,507,000 34,397 $131 2003 $1,495,000 $2,735,DW 54,230,000 S3,7B1,000 37,845 $100 2004 $1,115,000 $1,115,000 $2,230,000 $1,993,000 39,741 $50 2005 $755,000 13,397,000 34,152,000 $3,711,000 41,724 $89 2006 $610,000 $3,345,000 54,156,000 $3,715,000 43,836 $85 r 2007 $865,000 33,301,000 14,168,000 $3,724,000 46,034 $01 2008 $910,000 $3,253,000 54,163,000 313.721,000 48,319 $77 2009 $960,000 $3,202,000 $4,162,000 $3,720,000 50,733 $73 2010 $1,015,000 $3,148,000 $4,163,000 $3,72,000 51,747 $72 2011 12,025,000 53,065,000 $5,090,DW $4,549,000 52,782 $66 2012 12,140,000 $2,952,000 $5,092,000 $4,551,000 53,838 $85 2013 $7,265,000 $2,830,000 $5,095,000 $4,554,000 54,915 $83 2014 $2,390,000 $2,701,000 $5,091,000 $4,650,000 $6,013 $81 2015 12,530,000 32,56000 $5,094,000 $4,553,000 57,133 $80 2016 52,615,000 $2,417,000 $5,092,000 $4,551,000 58,276 SIB 2017 $2,835,000 $2,261,000 $5,096,000 $4,555,000 $9,441 $77 2018 $2,995,000 $2,095,000 $5,090,000 $4,549,000 60,630 $75 2019 $3,175,000 $1,919,000 $5,094,000 $4,553,000 61,843 $74 I ' 2020 $3,360,000 $1,731,000 $5,093,000 $4,552,000 63,080 $72 2021 $3,560,000 $1,538,000 55,096,000 $4,555,000 64,341 $71 2072 53,16500 51,325,000 55,091,000 5050,000 65,626 $69 2013 $3,990,000 $1,105,000 $5,095,000 54,55000 66,941 $68 2024 $4,215,000 1811,000 $5,095,000 54,555,000 68,279 $61 2025 $4,475000 $622,000 $5,091,000 $4,556,000 69,645 $65 2026 $2,105,000 1431,000 $2,542,000 $2,212,000 71,038 $32 2027 $2,220,000 $320,000 $2,540,DW 52,270,000 72,459 331 2028 $2,340,000 $197,W0 $2,531,000 $2,268,000 73,908 $31 2029 $2,415,000 $61,000 $2,542,DW $2,272,000 75,366 1140 Total $61,040,000 $65,951,000 $132,901,000 $118,867,000 12,285 Net Presont Value 3111182 , 1998; non- iesDebt service payments for lake Rey Roberts from Plty of Denton Water Utilit Debt $2 4f: portion is 89.38%, which excludes cost of greenbuh; watet SFEs 1999 2009 from Table 8; water Me 20102029 estimated assuming 2% annual growth; net present relue based on 5.5% discount rate. i City of Donton/Water and Wastewater impact Fee CtP 5/28/98 Page 21 20 3'a 7..'i x 10 J 32X 10 Noma Ri - D . i Table 20 WASTEWATER DEBT SERVICE CREDIT I Wastewater Cred'N Year Principal Interest Total SFEs SFE 1999 $950,000 $683,000 $1,633,000 30,081 $54 2000 $891,000 $624,000 $1,515,000 30,972 $49 2001 $949,000 $575,000 51,52400 31,903 $49 2002 $951,000 1525,000 $1,476,000 32,874 $45 2003 $1366,000 $473,400 $1,439,000 35,182 $41 2004 $972,000 $420,000 $1,392,000 36,964 538 2005 2988,000 5367,000 $1,355,000 38,826 $35 2006 5993,000 $310,000 $1,303,000 40,769 $32 2007 $634.000 11266,000 $904000 42,794 $21 2006 567400 5229,000 5903,000 44,939 $20 2009 $60,000 $194,000 $795000 47,166 $IJ ; ' 2010 SHOW $163,000 $747,000 48,109 $16 2011 $490,000 $133,000 $623,000 49,072 $13 2012 1500,000 11104,000 $604,000 50,053 $12 2013 $510,000 117,000 $587,000 51,054 $11 2014 $520,000 $50,000 $570,000 52,075 $11 205 $200,000 $31,000 $231,000 53,117 $4 2016 $210,000 $19,000 $229,000 54,179 $4 2017 $225,000 $6,000 5231,00) 55,263 $4 Total $12,808,000 $5,249,000 $18,057,000 $475 Net Present Value $345 S -pKcw Debt service payments for 19$7 through 1997 wastewater land issues from City of Demon Wster Utilities, 1998; wastewater Wit 1999.2009 from Table 9; wastewater SFEs 2010-2017 estimated assuming 2% annual growth; net present value basedon 5.5%d5iscount rate. J 'f } I Qj City of DontomWof n and Wasrawatar krW Fee CIP same tw r. I r r Pape 22 Cs 32 10 , + A a , NET COST SCHEDULE The net cost per service unit is calculated by subtracting the credit per service unit from the cost per service unit. As shown in Table 21, the net cost per service unit is $2,044 for water and $554 for wastewater. Table 21 WATER AND WASTEWATER NET COST PER SERVICE UNIT Coal/ Crediv Net Cosy SFE SFE SFE Water Treatment/Pumping5torage $2,278 ($3211 $1,957 WaterSupp)q $1,269 {51,1821 $87 Subtotal, Water Facilities $3,547 ($1,503) $2,044 WastewaterTyIatmeM $899 {5345) $554 Total, Water and Wastewater $4,446 {$1,6481 $2,598 _uat Costs from Tables 13,15 and 17; credits from Tables 8, 19 and 20. The following net unit cost schedale represents the maximum impact fees that may be charged L by the City for central water and wastewater facilities, based on the adopted Land Use Assumptions, the utility system evaluation and capital improvement cost estimates prepared by Alan Plummer Associates, and the additional data and analysis presented in this study. Table 22 WATER AND WASTEWATER NET COST BY METER SIZE Water SFEe Mid Cost Per SFE l&et Con on Meer Meter per Site Meter kid" Wastewater Water Wastewater 6/8" K 3r4' 1.0 $2,044 $554 $2,044 $554 1 1 ' 2,5 $2,044 $554 $5,110 $1,15 ..t 1-172' 6.0 82,044 $554 $10,220 $2,770 1 , 2' 8,0 $2,044 $554 $16,352 $4,432 3' 16,0 32,044 $554 $32,704 $804 4' 25.0 $2,044 $554 $51,100 31$,650 6" 50.0 $2,044 $554 $102,200 521,700 6" 60.0 $2,044 $554 5163,520 $44,320 { 10' 115.0 $2,044 SS54 $235,060 $63,710 Sources SFEe per meter Irom Table 3, not costs per SFE from Table 21. 0 City of DontOrvWstar and Wastewater Impact Fee CIP 5126/96 Page 23 28 j. 10 32XID awrm p AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET r AGENDA DATE: June 9, 1998 DEPARTMENT: SOLID WASTE ADMINISTRATION ACNI: HOWARD MARTIN U' SUBJECT: Receive a report. hold a discussion and give staff direction concerning a Residential Solid Rasta automated collection and o public'privatc partnership to develop a Materials Recovery Facility tNIRFi BACKGROUND: The baseline Solid \1a5fe budget recommended by the Public Utilities Board includes the follotting not programs projects Stith no rate increase: • Residential Automat:d Route • Roll-0@• Route Addition • .klternative Daily Cover • After Hours Drop-Off Site Other programs considered but not recommended for funding include dumpster screening in the Oak Hickory street area, construction site pilot rec}cling program, and enhancements to the landfill drop-off recycling site, The Public ltilities Board is also recommending a supplemental decision package for your consideration for a pubhc/priyate partnership to develop a Materials Recovery Facility t41RFl. A number of benefits could be realized by having the MRF including being able to n provide curbside recycling to our residential solid waste customers, being able to recycle over 251ro of our waste stream. and the ability to oft'-set our cost by bringing in waste from outside - ' • the city limits. The MRF would process the haste by removing recyclables and the landfill bound haste ttould be baled at a density of 1800 lbs. per cubic yard as opposed to the 12001b density tse currently c\perience in our landfill. This has the effect of creating additional space in our landtill. This t'acility could enable us to achieve the recycling goals identified in the Solid \I'aste \la,ter Plan 5 N n 32xio tom! L + 0 { i i'. i 4 F.SI'IS1:\"1 { I3 S(H :It( I.F. OF PROJECT The residem .1 n ate ,%ould begin with the second quarter of FY 1999 and the MRF is estintaled tr' ur pn ce..in ht the middle of ff 1999. PRIOR AIC I IUD ItE~ lk:\~: Ulscussi,rm Ith tin' Public I n1wl:s Board regarding these issues tune begun to January of this %ear 11 . MRI .onta•11I and tiltancing hate etohed based upon input from the Board. 1 FISCAL \1 0101 %1 10\: v Financial w :i:xioii '•%Ill he pi,:,cnted in the e\I1161I5. Respectfull) submitted: Charles S. R'alkins • Director of Solid Waste I Bhlbil I MA.,,i R:comrncndanons LOIN 3 Reodcnnal Rourc Addition E~hibn } \ia:enal He«nery Fac rl rt) ~ Ethibrl J llr.,rnt.nlon Vt vo lal and Financial %nal%s+s Backup r I t . l r, k 2. l OWN r F 1% 2XICl RIM 411LAL~Olq&ERMnOSAL~ • ! 1 A'1 1 t i. 1 • 1° I I (i jf l I 1 f • 1 j BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS •***BAS1•:L1NE 13UDGET: Residential Automated Route j Leese Purchase Roll-off Route Addition Alternative Daily Cover After Hours Drop-Off Site a Dumpster Screening in Oak/Hickory area Construction Site Pilot Recycling Program Enhancements to Landfill Drop-Off Site •:•MATF RIALS RECOVERY FACILITY (MRF) Private-owned and operated 140,000 tons/vear Cite-kmiled and operated Not RL-,omi 3 „?5 k i 0° 32 I a. I . ~ ~ ~ 1 ail •I. '1 p.: I. , I fl i' i l 1. Y RESIDENTIAL ROUTE ADDITION r I i • r' , I 4 4e.5 x ❑ 32X~❑ , I a {%•1 ~ y8 ,Y X11 YI A rP J Y ' f i' f I.i o ,r . I ~ r r r . . 0 4 1 Fully-Automated Collection A fully automated system entails complete mechanical collection and dumping of a specialized container. Containers range in size from 32 to 440 gallons. The crew, I' normally one person, rarely dismounts from the vehicle during collection, so solid waste i containers must be placed where they are accessible to the fifting device. Customer participation in ft placement of the containers is essential to successful automated collection. The collection vehicle usually has a large capacity to take advantage of the speed of operation. The body sizes range from 20 - 40 cubic yards. There are two types of automated collection technologies: • a crane-like arm of four to 13 feet in length that can be operated by the driver from Inside the vehicle cab, the arm reaches out, grasps the container, raises and dumps R and returns ft container to its original position on the curb; and • a claw like grasping device attached to the side of a side loader that extends out to 4 feet to the container bd up grasp ng it to the vehicle, raise- tip-and empty the container and return the container to its original position on the curb. These containers must be sturdy enough or flexible enough to allow the claws to grasp them without damage. The claws handle containers from 32 to 440 gallons. Automated collection systems advantages include: • no dismounting, no manual collection or dumping, • reduction to one person per collection vehicle, • the person is an operator not a colfectof, • fatigue is minimal, • dramatic reduction In injuries and • due to the less physical demands individuals with less physical strength can operate the vehicles. Figure 111•3 illustrates several fully automated collection vehicles. Jt. J 5 Ir 0.. J 5 r ,a -y r atr 2!5 * ❑ 32 x , . 41 1 ~r E. i • i . ~ , . S. r , r i Manual Collection } k l Manual collection vehicles can be of any size or configuration. Residential solid waste I . is usually collected in compacting bodies mounted on either single axle or double axis i chassis. The common types of equipment used are rear and side loaders (Figure III-1) I Sizes range from 6.39 cubic yards. The loading hopper can be in the rear, side or front, 4 hopper sizes range from 1.5 wbic yards. t Some LGUs utilize open bodied non-oompacting vehicles to collect bulky items, etc. Normal crew sizes range from one person who drives and bads to three or more workers. Non" work patterns for manual collection are: • one man • drives veNcle and loads, • two man - driver and loader. both may bad, loader may bed, driver drives: they may interchange roles, or • three man • driver and two loaders; driver drives, loaders load. r The drawbacks to manual collection are: • as the day progresses fatigue sets 4r and affects the speed of operation , • higher injuries than semilfull automated, • increased chance of lifting injuries • increased chance of Injuries from boarding or leaving vehicle • oanrot handle as large a route a$ semOuti automated collection per worker, • greater percentages of severe injuries, • crew physical burnout and increased absen'seism, and • r crows must be inkysiceuN capable of performing rapetitioue sustained lift of Nbs or more. E ,y ! i 'r l 1 , i 25)( 10 32 e 0 i 1 l t 4) i SOLID WASTE PROGRAM OPTION Option I A (No Rate Incrtate) PRIORITI' PROUR4AtMUC'RIPTION F$$'l NETCA.1'11NA1.4NC'F UECTRIC'REP4YAIENT $201,000 f-IUQ(WU 1 1 Residential Aulomaled Route salt %o S31NI INN I 2 Roll Olf Route Addition SIN) INN) 12 WI 4M J Allernalise Dail (wer SN0 11MI J After floor Drup-Off Site S80" 1145,190 Ne; krr~rrnnlYndYJlNnJin level S Dum slerxreenin S401NN1 SI0101N1 sissImm If, Construction Silt Pilot Rrc clip Sib NI SNU (NNI SIJN 21NI 7 lKithanctmemi to Landfill 4NI NII fNN1 0.0491 Option 1 b (No Rate Increase) PR1OR11V PROGR4All!ESCRIPTION (Y)ST NETCANIIBAIAN('E F. I.ECTRIC'RAP,4YAIEW V S201.000 s.I(to ovu I Residential Manual Riwle 131 INMI SIbq,INMI 1)1X1 INNI 2 Rull Off Route Addilbe S2111MIU 5149 MNI S31Nt IMNI 3 Ahernalise Daily ('user 14149) 149 "I Sl1N) INM1 J After Flour Drop-Off Silt S3IINII) sN111NM1 129! 491 t Dum rler lcreenia SJOIMNI SNIT 1101 S2J3 VNI b ('nnslroctiun Silt PiH;I Rte elie 516 (MI SNf11NNl S22b 71NI T I 1 q 1 1 %he i f O tiOn I C (No Rate Increase) PRIORITY PROGR4311lEA'('RIPTION C'ONT NET (A.IYIRAL_4N('F El.EfTRI('REPAYAIENT i 0 52JN,000 ! oli'000 0 1 RrsldenMA Semi Automaltd Ruutt still m 5120,200 1l1MI INN> w 2 Roll Off Ruule Addition $Z0 INN) 11191 IIN1 1lIM> INNI ! Allernatise Daily Coser 5u0501 SEfNMI _ S2bv TINT J More Ilrour Dru -OII Site 131 INNI 1NEI INNI 1134 71M1 S Dum ster scree Lln SJII NNI SNEI IMNI 1194 TIN/ sYalfi+rr,rnnnYnikJFun,hrr lrrr! _ 6 CongWclion Sile NNsf Rrs cHag Slb ENI 1NIi INNI 1177 rNMI an fill Drop-Off Silt S3! 491 NII INNI I U JINI 7 Feths rn r to i .ce. . !~•~,tiq:r:--ems, ' ~ ~I ID o I I PROGRAM OPTION 1 Option I it Option I b Purtiaala$ Equipment Reatio$ Egoipaaeot Marralm Peraonul $77,000 $71.000 TT 25FfE Drivel Backe Driver, dt Temp Supplin S61000 56.000 f6 Fuel $4Slh> $3,300 S3,500 Uniform Prolftlive Clolbi S"1 $500 $300 Malmlenance $It.~00 S1i~00 510,000 Senktr 56om SUM 50 Lease Purchase CoMminer $21,e11t1 $19,908 F 1prm nl Pa menl 151,200 $40UJJ Cepilal 510,1100 110,000 $o Teo'flppen 110,tN10 $10,000 iUTAL 5163 f a• 597 ' N.nud r..ul a 0A he M liime #0001 1.a y 4w! v I • I Cuslomd$ro"th $2U1,SSa 1 (Aertime 524,530 FY 1997 S69,t60 ReAlctlonof25%(Prop"W$91.190) FY 1999 $16,195 L FY 1999 S 1111.000 1 QaNge bag S." 2 Esislin; personnel S15,0W Transfer to Rtsldemial I S O ALL f 27 ,600 A R 32x~ tll i i O I RESIDENTIAL ROUTE restonnage brush total 92 18776 0 18776 93 18493 0 18493 94 17938 2501 20445 95 16842 4315 21157 96 16944 6930 23874 97 18880 7154 26034 Residential solid waste and brush hm increased 38.7% since fy 92 r: building permit data 90 104 0 p 91 134 0 p 92 1% 0 0 k 93 one Earn detached 307 two family i one fam attached 0 • ; 94 252 4 0 95 288 3 2 96 267 l 14 97 thru no 202 0 6 total of 1760 units Residential staflng: 7 m ideotial drivers 4 Mahn wwoe Worker 11 1 I Maintenance Worker I 1.25 Temp/seasonal Note: Used to have 6 driven, S Maint Worker IL and 12 Maim Worker 1. Reagaai W in 95/96 by proototrng one res supv to collation mgr, added a crew fader and deleted a Maur Worker L Last h 824 hours were lost due to waters co". From i 1994 thru 19% resideaU svgs sprox IS 1 hours sick and 2208 boors vacation r _ l r • f a, r r r hu`t' J~f r ` a{ t 7 x a 32x10 l 'i. 5tl n y xF r . , 0 . Aloes Aeddst" house 00110! by route TUSS-Pd Oft Wod brw3 ra 1310 1122 2 1370 1191 ; 4 3 5531 1200 ; 1 IiIS 1 1114 ; ~ S 1220 130S 3 6 1121 1317 3 E. r 7 rwW route 667 3 i ~7 1317 Aversp E i r i r ~ 0 • 1i 10 I J }itY, ~IJJ 1 1 r 32X' 10 Mi i s i %gram I . MATERIAL RECOVERY FACILITY I -44 y r 11 F 1.: 1 r~ l l ~ f ~ ~~~32 x - r o orbs SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING PEOUEST FY !998.99 s 0apt D r,s,on Sold Waste Dwadn No Landhrl program Tills. MaletiV Recovery faalrty Brief Program Description: Public private partnership &'In a nasty cOnveralon bun 10 consthCt and Operate a mater a:0 reco.ery habry ,A1Re 1 near the G r7 of Oenion umow ho 1 Parson *I Reci DataE No of Begin 081e1 Annual Hours, positions Proposed Position Tate End Date FTE i l l Program Es enditure Datait: Account 8ud at In" No. Account Tole III ew 2nd rear 3rd year Expenditure Inc #$is 8123 Plastic 8a Blue 8a a 2S 000 85%X MFIF Pro essin Fee 255,081 eS%X MRF Capital Fes 217.298 8809 Cloaweposicli 11,830 8e22 Transfer IPranch se fool :5111 Expenditure Re verion'. t4 RayenW rnAancemenr: td Outside Contact Revenue E33,S00 Outside franchise Fos Revenue 24,500 RacYelin Revenue 4,000 Funding from, OfAer Sources t-1 Eapend,mre Increases Subtotal 534.1533 0 0 Eapenditul Reduction Subtotal 0 0 0 Revenue, Enhancement Subtotal 814.000 0 0 r . funding from Other Soufces Subtotal 0 0 0 ' y Told 111"16ram Funding Re ulrament • • 11/.leT 0 0 Negative number repraaenta a net eaeess of revenue over ercense aq.r..... 6RSe 3 raV , 12 12 x i 0 0 CITY OF DENTON TEXAS___ ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES Dept. Sod Waste Divis;an Division No. tandfi8 108031 1998.97 1997.98 1997.98 199899 RESOURCES ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE PROPOSED Outside Conrad Rev!nua 0 0 0 633.500 + Outs,ds Franchise Fee Revenue 0 0 0 24,500 Recycling Revenue 0 0 0 4,000 { TOTAL RESOURCES 0 0 0 654,000 1996-97 1997.96 1997.98 1998.99 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE PROPOSED Supplies 0 0 0 25,000 MRP Processing Fee 0 0 0 255,064 MRF Capital Fee 0 0 0 217.298 f CIO$ ura'Pos 1 closure 0 0 0 11,830 j Transfer lFranch ss Feel 0 0 0 25,341 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 534,533 PERSONNEL 1996.97 1997.98 1997.98 1998.99 4FuR T1me Equfvalentsl ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE PROPOSED Service Mamtenance 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OffcerClencal 0.00 O.M 0.00 0,00 TeeltruuhPars professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SWorNPuwc Safety 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ManapemanuSupervivon 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL REGULAR PERSONNEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tempwary Seasonal _ 0.00 0.00 0100 000 TOTAL PERSONNEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .r MAJOR BUDGET CHANGES e PuCLc'orrvsta partnership with a waste convsrs on firm to construct and operate a rnatenels recovery facility (MRF) near tN City C( Con" LarKM 1 V0444 led to Ow/ry SerVICia 13 I • k r' K 10 32XI I] 0 j Landfill Life with Increased Compaction Life through 2066 versus 2040 14,000,000 12,000,000 - - - - N u $ 10,000,000 - - - - E ci 8.070,000 - .a E 6,000,000 - 0 v 4,000,000 2,000,000 - - - - - - - 0 1099 2004 2000 2014 2010 2024 2029 2034 2039 2044 2049 20'34 +-1800 LB& / CY -a-1200 LBs / CY t I i, 2 ~l 3 2 x ❑ Wells" 0 1 LandAll Call U"99 (Your Entoring Each Coll) 2015 2013 - - - 2011 - 2009 2007 2005 - - 2003 2001 1999 - - k 1997 1 - - k Cell 1 Cep 2A Cd 28 Cell 2C Cd 3A No Ex;>en0e0 Recyclkq -s- MI Recyc kq * 40,000 Tons Reoyctk►p + 180,000 Torn i,And}ill Cell Ueeae Fiscal Year Entering each Cell C U Ceti 2A Cd_2e CA" CaL U No Expended Recycling 1999 20011 2003 2006 2006 WCI Recycling + 10,000 Toro 1999 2002 2006 2010 2014 WCI Recycling + 160,000 Tom 1999 2001 2002 2006 2007 im 2009 200.1 2002 2002 204 2006 2000 2002 204/ 200! 2410 No Expended Recycling 1 I 2A 2A 29 26 26 2C 2C 2A 7A 3A WCI Recycling + 10,000 Tom I 1 I 2A 2A 2A 29 29 2e 26 29 2C JL WCI Recycling + 160,000 Tom I I 2A 29 29 28 2C 2C 6A 2A 38 26 V, 32XIII o ; ' o I i I SOLID WASTE j ons i I OPTION PROGRAM DESCRIPTION NET CASH BALANCE" RATE IMPACT LANDFILL RECI'CL.ING 1999 2014i 2001 21412 21413 19" 24111 21N11 21412 21111 CV/YR. SITELIFE 1'R. ".u11'14. aF ^ tg 110°,6 II (Ri",w h SIC. W6 4 70% 1 p ~ 1 HasetAne 200,116 Oil bllw. IM4 IIlM146 b)1 NFr 056 470^ii , J 17 J1 1J?• 11 Y% 1111". 000', 1 ISr AIRF, 2 Willi 140,M) 1,"14 r~ a e 120,122 (d) IS- Ii"« i . Iriy~xt yhx~rR 171117(1 '1',xr j' M ~ M i IIIM/. 111141 011"6 001, 15416 ~I o NIRF^ Z:S g S2 Q Q Ob",i 0L!L IIIW. U0% IIII!L 3 LL'uh Annual of 2111,140 "frm.r oN V n 205 So 191,991 40 15 IS eune rdw ♦ n h m wgh t m,g, lu Jill I'M1111rpnr 11 a^Aurlxr renuiu V1 • 1111!4 11(06 ll (a•. II W,h ll fl!L i I 3 lo 0 O a-anram Material Recovery Facility { 331 Toss Per Day COD Private Work Days Ton Per Da Diversion Rau otO Tonnage) p` u` Processing Fee a-Swi„ Reg ciin Processing Fee 4,,.` Recycling Sale City % of commodity ravenue Fixed Cost Return Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Fixed Cost Ca ;tai Payments Payments Payments Pa ants Buildi 5109,440 9,120 $109,440 91 E ul ent Baler, Conveyor, Etc,) $285,646 23,604 $255,648 23. 0 0 Add 10% 0 $0 a artable Cost OSM Salaries (Personnel) 1 $591,1551 49 201 5591 1511 49,203 Others Su lies, Maint. Services) 1 $345,600 20,800 5,600 28, p 1 Volume 6 Processing Cost Tonnage Fee onna NF" Commercial 70405 21,940 70485 Residential 18,880 $75520 18,680 Contract, Cash Fee, Other Dept. 13,697 $54,708 13 697 Outside Load 0 So 0 Total 19310621,__11411M 103 2 Recycling Processin Volume S Cost Recycling Volume 14,944 1429 34 WCI Rec ciin Revenue 14,944 $597 760 14,429 $721,4 COD Recycling Revenue 14,944 45070 14,429 -554,106 Total 1 944 3 1 2 0 Total Vanable Costs 06M $931 181 5936 768 Processing Revenue $989339 $1308402 Profits 1.4% 513176 39.0% _ $271 H6 Total FfKed d Var4ble COSU 5831186 $93617" • Tora! Revenue Fixed d Processing 5960232 $1308 401 Profits 1.4% 13476 29.0% $271 Q + ( Cosf per Ton 909 KS2 j7-3 Revenue rTn $9.221 1 Prorir r Ton 0.13 17 ` u~ r) 3 2 L7 )A-= ar Ma D 11"I V Material Recovery Facility 430 Tons Per Day COD Private Work Days Ton Per Da::, Diversion Rats (Total Tonnage) Processin Fee s Recycling Processing Fee Rec din 4ale i % o! commodi avenue Fixed Cost Return Annual Monthly Annual Men'" Fixed Cost Ce ial Payments Payments Payments P ants Building $109440 9,120 $109.440 9 1201 E ui ment Baler, Conveyor. Etc. $285,648 23,804 85,848 23, $396,09 32 f 4 39 061 319 Add 100,5 434,597 631 Ytb 434,597 36 2111 Variable Cost OW Salaries Personne $591158 49283 $591156 49253 Others (Supplies, Maint. Services $34 ,000 28,800 34 ,600 26,8 75,"31 5931, 475.0 Volume & Processing Cost Tonnage Fee Tonnage Residential 19 500 $87 75 Ccmme+clal =314,950$139,800 000 .0001 $ 319 Cor,lrad, Cesh Fee, Other Oept. 74 S00 365 2 Culside Load 34,50 $157,27 Total $5116,11 131 Recyclin Processing Volume d Cost Rec ctin Volume 20,223 19 93 WCI Recycling Revenue 20,293 $811,710 19,593 $979,654 COD Recycling Revenue 20,293 1,171 19,593 473,474 Total 20 9 1 0 - Total Variable Costs O&M $936168 $934.75%6 Processing Revenue $1290339$1636961 Profits 37.7% $31113,6113 $4.0% $591.19 rotat Fixed A Varlsble Costs $13318N JJ! t141 . Total Revenue Fixed 6 Procv!tnj 11724 938 31970 646 Profits 291% 393092 48.0% 63170 Q • Cosf r Ton 9.52 9.52 Revenue r Ton _ 312.33 3!1.06 Profd r ton 32. 1' - 1.58 ~8 f, 32 X I 0 a Solid Waste Franchise Fee $700 $600 $500 - - _ - - - n $400 c0 $ 5300 - . ,f $200 - I $100 _ - 1~t i $0 y FY" FY00 FYN - ^FY02- FY03 FY04 FY05 --0-BaseLlne (Option 1) -40-MRF WMA Plus 40,000 Tons (Option 2) ~n MRF WNh Plus 160,000 Tons (0- -pC ) +3 I r.. 32 x • o ' 1 t , i III . r .y i i i PRESENTATION MATERIAL AND 1 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS BACKUP I i V 1 20 1 0 32Vx 10 0 SOLID WASTE l MASTER PLAN ORIGINAL GOALS: ♦ Continue drop-off recycling until curbside begins ♦ Bi-monthly curbside newspaper collections - 1996 ♦ Target high value materials ♦ Intermediate Processing Center (IPC) - 1998 ♦ Begin once weekly collection of recyclables and once weekly collectin of solid waste - 1998 ♦ Elimination of drop-off facilities - 1998 ♦ Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) - 2005 ♦ Achieve diversion rate of 10% - 1995, 25% - 2000, 45% - 2005, 50% - 2010, 55% - 2015 ♦ Expand Landfill - 1997 ♦ Co-locate Resource Recovery Industries with IPC • • ♦ Regional Recycling & limited landfill services f21 25 x' CJ 32 x 10 A qmwp" 0 r SOLID WASTE ( MASTER PLAN REVISED GOALS: ♦ Continue drop-off recycling until curbside begins ♦ Elimination of proposed bi-monthly curbside newspaper t.ollections ~ J ♦ Establish partnership for high value recyclables - 1997 ♦ Intermediate Processing Center (IPC) - 2000 1 ♦ Material, Recovery Facility (MRF) - 2010 ♦ Phase in apartment complex recycling program ♦ Establish landfill recycle / salvage center 1 , ♦ Achieve diversion rate of 10% - 1995, 1 Coo • 2000, 30% - ! 2001, 40% - 2010, 55% - 2015 ♦ Expand Landfill in 1998 ♦ Co-locate Resource Recovery Industries with [PC ♦ Regional Recycling & limited landfill services 22 32do T 51 It p .1 r v 'i 1~ r 2~~ 1 . 1 ~ ~ 1 1~ ~r'ti ti r ~ i' • r is . 1 O •r a • 1 i, SOLID WASTE ( MASTER PLAN DIVERSION FACILITY PARTNERSHIP: r ♦ Eliminate need for Intermediate Processing Center r ♦ Materials Recovery Facility - 1999 ♦ Eliminate need for commercial cardboard an,] office paper recycling partnership ♦ Eliminate need for apartment complex recycling program ♦ Develop landfill recycling / salvage as component of Total Recovery Facility (TRF) ♦ Achieve 40% diversion rate by 2000 1 I F r„ I ;a r: .t y '7 r 23 'r t F, 32 X 10 `PY , r t Proforma Summaries WCI + WC+ I 1999.2005 x1,000) UQ-EQApQfsj 40.QOO Tons 190QN Tons Residential Revenue $21,135 $19,758 $19.672 Commercial Revenue 35,668 33.684 33,576 lenton Landfill Revenue 3,941 3,941 3,941 Outside Contract Landfill Revenue 0 7,407 39,442 Outside Contract Franchise Revenue 0 280 1,530 Recycling Revenue 679 768 1,439 Other 246 246 246 Total Operating & Other Revs $61,668 566,090 $99,846 Operating Expenses ($47,548) ($45,308) ($46,774) WCI Capita) Fee $0 ($2,293) (52,293) WCI Processing Fee $0 ($3,923) ($7,407) Debt Service Interest (53,061) ($2,811) (53,245) r Nonoperabng Revs iExps) $1,400 $1,311 $2,180 Operating Transfers (Out) (55,9.52) M M% 157.3921 ($55,166) tS59,142) ($64.931) ry. Net Income S6,503 $6,948 $34,915 Fixed Assets ($2,514) (52,436) ($2,436) Debt Principal ($6,923) ($5.411) ($7,943) Electric Repayment (54321 (59521 (54621 ($9,869) (58,329) ($10,861) ` ( Cash Net Income $1,023 $2,584 $28,546 umufatlve Cash Income 51,537 S3,168 $29,047 i Total Revenue $64,871 569287 $103,830 I Total Cash Expense SO-84H 566.2 } :..;.262 I Cash Net Income 51,923 12,5(1.4 529.548 t: ).r`J Or % r 24 L 0. .~~t 1, 32 X I II e 0 1 n • SOLID WASTE PROFOP.MA SUMMARIES ~ Ls1 rs3 ru a rs "SWMaf.pw111E011ic1e 114LBf: j H7 u'q url b1:1 1]I ill 1 Ow . it N'" IJ w Ulu id • om:. a1^.^.. o Y' 15' I AI 1 Z1 I k] I r. I s: 615 "I Crnn ll+Ril 01.x,1 +1! Itt Is) So: of I" !1U' L.11 I. i lr1<rnJ 4.re /1 14 " '11 n rl u!1 ' 17 n~ 11 a w v 1t L' L' Eiu :q. r1•yl s•r awl uv1 will u»1 u'>1 {I'1I ".N to 1.1 11+641 11)'1 U'A &A ell uII$ Will 10 01'1 u'1" - tva rani Glrm A 3111 4-J"1 'I U., V'NI 0 0"1 1! uh d l' h 01111 n Colo 4lico Ili 1,ll 16!1 1YI Coll IN, U9q b.-..rre10M L+:[ AI rl YI 2'1 'It 'H 14 1'IV Ctreal T'll Crn I::L ::1,1 JUL in J:L AL Ji1 +119111 I IllI (11111 IT1ul dull IH11 11'1 IS!r1 u1'"! br :ne.T. r 9S •Y Al V4 CI 16 U' I kl UJ E:n uu &A 111 u.Y 1a: 11JC1 F." 1.If1 ',1191 SI'I 1111! 'A7 1.1, rN11 'u11 11'11 Cod lm.00 M31 "L 1'+'11 P'/1 '•A'1 '.'1'41 I'l•R 'I UU lr+r •<.1'tin1 JE'Sli IL::W At Ili, A. 2-2l lux KJ, 11' 411 59.811 t1w 4w Nc.r u 111 J& 1al a:, 1I I" L'.u1 a•..:uTl cw __.S•w 1.1 _ U+" 1:,1L'.__1 ell lrr IL rN U1,1 uY4 110714 111 I1.Y 114Y 1.0x1 511 Ih T.II CIII I<rw B.S: ILNJ ku:.f 11JEE LUU t1"1 I" : 1111 , 14 W ell, WJ u' PO U'1 IH MSW WCI.10,MGTln 1•Srl in pl ' r r Y 1 w.rllli liti U'N N' 1 11 V14 oil 3 N1.1 feu' UN' 61!" «c.1 s1q-•. I Y' I'N 1'1' 111 +I)' 114 1'17 1V "1 1 l1, [4n4n :IT..llf 4. rut Ii' A SM IY. 111 1" 11w 1 Iw i1 -71 1 • r "1 r 1 11t i f0 1! 441 Not, C. 1rN It n bdl aNrl r.•.r y. Jo is 11 Il I: 144 Poi earn p w '1,A 1a x 'V V 1 U 4 L VU ' ]Ilr u a a v M on a u s a 11Y'C[r.r11 }y 4A 1141, `1141 )-1 111.0 111" NN] 1')N! 4Yi N0 so *10 {I 1.1 Ili-, No" %I N ii 1r $I Ili 1'1111 11174a Tr11 Cawlx/1...« 1)1:1 47u' 1r.I 1«'r '4w1 1611 I114 1 Ulm f1:I Cr1w I. 'Y'1 +111 411• +16 411 J'4 I•ri1 92411 N:10•r.wla/0w 167'4 51L 1•b 154 1 4.1 '4U. 41001 ' C10111.<. IN1nl' IfEi a DJ! !L) 14L )'h li 111'4 b.n.Ii A. I l¢n 'u 'H rA 1!1 1" l'1 'U 1'111 k«b./ T•rn 1 Crn J:1 1+11 lar J:1'. 94C ZA. 9,1 IM!.'ll O Us, 1UI IC31 IH'1, IIAI 1'IN 111+1 ur1-0 +..n..-. L,1 E:111 L:1 :1:1 bli 471 1 L1MC Li L3 8:1 ELL aII Lu aafl [I" .olli ,c u11 ~K11 41CI 'A!7 d'e 1l Tl 1" 4 111 ",111 Doom Oro<II IY71 .011 1'q 11A, PT-I 1 'Li H N>I ;llrlr Os1r'."1 L'N7 1'..111 i .1:1 E 1 1 JIM J•H'I '4"y] J•NOl LYL i L= i JLUL c.w' w In,r. . :rNTrTl CUl 1n•.-. 8,'J 1'!11 L" Full Elam ial 11 1L1V Troll wwr.l 11'u 111]1 got" to xI 1171' V11!6 1'1 Sr. us is? T Is C«t Ie4^r Ulna 11lµ Ioii WU Ulm 1"a 1141-4 IY131 us1 U.' 4]1 4'I 1N. 1w 1'11 Nw 119SWWC1.160,000fon1nSwinpl 1 ru)r'1.1 err.1 Wei U'14 Nlrr 114I'1 U{'4 I]N• 11.1 all 1.1617 o '1rnMr;.l pal I Y' O .J. [ !1! 4 41 +/U 11'1 11.1 Ili 1H Crb^ V,^ 11 P• tl• NI "C M 01 1" u"1 7wnal'", r or 111 [wR.l ldl IV$ IM IM' 4P1 111 6Sol IN we Note !11 .I Idi l.. "l I'1 IIl lot 114 H ill {•SV 1 S 4'r; r,, 111•.1 11 r-1 ltr Nr 1« Jl 1"w 3•r U 14 14 11 Il L' l.' L•7 '>'r kr++•J{?•• 1.4 P'1Y 1'4 IA 611! 641'1 0'1•N 1')1 61 k1 IA 1`4 P'vl 1'1 Xf 611" 6ely TI'U 1'1•:1 I'Itc/ In 014 'flb kwl'wJ Gcwvl 4N:' 4'41 14r' 1"4 4114' 1•w1 !I,1, 94 "A' J 1 N^ [i. v, e. J'p IM ell ,.11• ,4131 J'M 1'A1 64 063, ' b:l wrrlMl roe 1111' 11 w'1 i„. 11'1} 10./11 Iru. 1o M.. 1!101) fH 14nu'„14r IK,oil I'L HS 4'h .t]1 kU ►l1gl :'i+: 1 b,rwnry 4n (rlr •1! NI M 1L I'1 MJ VI U.61 1 :lwwaq ''r rla O:' Jlt .IL.'.7131 .CIL ;AIL 'J7'+ J'I'1 J1-111i7 •'T 11:1 1'11 11w Illb t'u •1'.11 l, U-1 11J.~ ul•r Wu "L vuAli 11.11 ' i • 1111 1L'v 11.•4 LLJU LLv1 P" Mf11 ILI: 115111 ' 1tL '1t 1111 +111 0rr'1 «o '1:'11 K. A'~ 1'h Vol 1'to'1 rAll Iy" J'N1t :a Ali 11, 1611 n'u in j1v- [r+ar1,-fro Cr1 "IL LkL JS 7 1 1!(71 W +l 2:11 J• It,, J' -1 1.. lob ILI" 1111 11:x.1 114E w ^..•4 LLU t. oN 1111 Will 4z: 1611 K" uw 1'111 1'.,+1 111:3 LA1 L;i 1:1.111 Sf.W 115.]1 1'1:5: 'f014,ae 1^H1 1.161 14 q1 14/u P11" 1'11'1 1'1 AS 0'1TIV 'r0 t«n [trr 11114 1'>!A 1'1131 III.Im 1LISH 11111 1'1,11+ vuu !1711 45:1 4f'1 w1 14 1 w'N 5, 19 141"1 i 25 10 ~ ~2 X I O~ leek n SCUD WASTE 99SWNOEapandrl Recvcie tayr Moor T41a.4+4 By pa n n n n n .-v 177%4 N I'M 1392 12191 1111 LIN Z= 1041 1702 2011 2001 iY! t:A=2 Rcsv,lA19 7 P0"lit'al 12611 {2.664 11 b1 $2712 $2.795 62191 121192 53150 b215 97725 / Icomnlefc,al 1)13 10,9 1.150 1611 4;H 1025 1064 5102 5114 s441 f\ Vrldril 1395 SC, 112 571 all S23 550 SM 431 4" l Recycling b, 33 75 IS IS % 101 III 1111 1 ' 5 s0 0 0 0 a 9 a I 0 6Tdat Operalmq Revenues a a b166 Hill 17 Sig 14 01 NDH b111 12104 {9131 613 is 1941 CIAaLBt1l60LL1! 7 Rs/dMl'al 13 M 21 33 N 14 31 7a 37 27 a Commercial 11 0 O 0 0 0 D 0 0 p 9 Landrl (Aspnan) 0 a a O a f o D o o 10 Admgvstrarpn C 0 0 o a 0 4 O ± p It Total Operating a are, Ravenum N 950 S774 91552 N 049 N 129 N,Ib N 732 11172 59 501 111.1 oplitatala~ac1as99 12 Pa viol 12167 !2295 tilu $2171 12.740 12141 {2.925 1304 931,36 p lpq 13 SQW,65 in 112 312 421 417 44 555 514 4T3 14 MarnlenaMe 755 pro pro r,l 767 102 WIN W bl me •i^ IS Sorecels Sib 665 6M 921 952 Nl 140 199 10r0 11b 16 In lurarKe vii 31 31 37 34 34 is 50 n Al 17 Sundry I% •50 102 .60 142 1, 157 11, IS! 110 is Diner, 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 p ' 19 M'SCe6aneous 0 0 a 0 0 0 I OI 0 a 0 o a o 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 p 19 !lad Oebt 11 50 40 M M 32 13 14 31 >t t 20 RelerveS • Contingency 0 D 0 150 150 111 ISO ,12 ISO 114 21 Admen Transle0 Gen Gov 4% Sol $41 SN SOO 621 454 191 1M 764 22 Depreolinon 167 219 IH 30 472 917 Lad Sol 290 290 23 Total Operating Eapwses 34162 15241 M4 SO 035 16265 IS S51 12.14 B.ob 17301 11.913 ' 11hOg-89Y61L164 1 an~nSefV operaling interest 1192 1,37 57» 5700 1200 MIS $2IS 9226 1212 1134 ZS kon 4peraunp interest 24 IS N Y W IS 14 13 is IS ~ . 26 Reserves ' Contingency 15" 0 0 ISO IN 154 ISO 150 tic l5p 27 Mbt Service IMere32 1121) 14711 14151 15301 [551) 026) 1402) 150/1 1401 (367) ' 210#0 IesuAnCe Eapenle 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 29 ONer Transfer Expense a 121) 1241 0 1 a o 0 0 0 ]D Doing MdOI Pod 0 411 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 31 Deb Retirement 0 ISSI 145) 0 0 p a p a p 31 LaudM Clo5ule 7 POStck4ura + 11291 122$2 Snu 1011 lam! IIOaI 1L1e1 v12u 17g1k t2011 32 Total NOeoperaling RdenlNl (Ex, 11.326 1IWI IH501 92,11 lLM) ,92411 Isllol ISM) 1 ' I#NI Ilgsl 001t160a -han slots -LOA 33 UIINty Translate ON 11057 I'Mr 11041 [41) 15711 1411 ISO) IS141 (113) 15491 34 Frawkse Fee 1111 129E !7961 1111 47205 1364 !3211 35 Total transfers oil 153' 11974 1393) ,T79 17!11 6301 5:441 13511 10201 ,till ;hp 19171 1171 r { 36 Net Income 12 167 11 o57 11A13 S, or 1102 tit! IXIS Iwo so$ 1951 ' 37 Total Operating 6 Omer Revenue mMo 11741 11542 U041 12.129 N6M 141)! 19 Ill It 409 11115 34Nonoperalm9 Revenues « ) 6 0:6 714 311 4,1 so all 711 411 391 439 ri 39 Reserves Gp+lal Canstructron 9 a a >D SO !D b N IQ x 43 total Revenue 12171 11410 11121 12517 Nbt so opt 132.0 12612 194% 110041 • 41 TOlat Casa E,penles 14 521 it 4S 17.464 NNI 12103 19114 14141 11112 191115 127% 42 Ruenres ' Capital C0nelevcnon 0 a o f0 >0 $0 N N so !0 4)FitedAsoi 111 121 323 391 261 tit 20 266 673 111 44 D6Dt PANIC* l 510 C39 139 122 9M 1015 111 1717 1171 Ilq 9KAy LT Dept E'IeCIOC 2! 150 110 121 N a o 0 0 a upay LT Debt LAM S 110 190 Im 120 u a a 2 0 41 Cosh Net In40rne Ulm HI Ms is 566 'pSl (14! 121 4.53 4tn 46 ReseMS 1400 6411 1112 1.4 6770 {717 It" 91214 11.311 11,131 26 Tr. ti - SO ~-I ..5 x IQ . 32XlCl 4~ , F. ' q NESIOENTIAL SMIO WASt! l 995 W YoE 4c4n0eaP 4q oe AclvAl Bu00er fs!1vu FY N F'1 FV rr re h 1992 1@90 1740 1394 20CA 3x11 2702 td] I T all Armun Cusrmv, 192020 IN 776 196650 022415 207015 207615 Eli all 0Ji Us 275 . .'76'.. i 231,,13 Gat-I'm "'l b-,11^ 65670 66.067 66767 69761 w72S 92.066 97467 95602 21.199 170654 7 Avg Cvi 1'041 Cusl 04S 044 046 Du 045 045 046 OU 011 049 4 Ar9 A14116O 1 Cun 1700 1.700 1700 17 DO 1300 1365 +715 1450 1460 +470 00614110 Ane^,.n ~ 6 57,190 0.199 5 Ne4Oar l Fu4 2.6+1 62 677 17 646 9 763 9."I 52.960 9.961 $.116 11504081 Fill 0 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f0as71r Diem 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Sal Swcil 11 1D 11 U 29 37 u 21 2S 7i I Total Op4lnry P4nnw4 2646 12.564 52.607 1,2766 9.794 9.967 12992 U, 140 9.215 $22S 10 Sale M ►eluw Ups 2S 21 21 2S 25 All 27 21 21 21 11 Ap01ar10a4 1 t I 1 0 1 I 1 9 1 12 ow Yur 0 a 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 13 ►etYCWIQ Sf 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 146rosn /Guu 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 15 p 0 p 0 0 Q 0 9 0 0 - Iatotal Op814log 1Ol 2,735 62724 52.747 9.119 9120 $,017 9021 $.116 9.2SI 1:11262 11 ►p 602 1691 5197 61.106 11,140 11.114 U 201 II M 11167 11,]21 II sill 411 115 167 163 Ito 111 1. r? 111 102 161 192 19 Marlene xf II1 93 95 110 112 114 111 119 121 124 20 54ti c11 9t 10S 105 179 167 t17 120 194 190 202 . 21 IFSu4nte 4 i 1 'I 12 12 +2 is I] 12 22 Surby I 4 4 1 4 27 0rra 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 24 Ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 25 Il Cons 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 26 660 God 0 16 11 IZ 12 111 13 13 14 is 1 2f Mac14Unwu4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 AOmn Tall Gel Gw 979 269 029 261 211 296 716 9S ]SS 371 29 cwa j la^ 6 11 U 21 u 2s 35 26 a n , 30 TOW 004i'l q Ew^ws 1,424 11.577 41177 11.661 61.970 12002 9061 9,174 12203 9.274 bkowel .,1 Ia sol I 31 101,,131 0301 674 151 161 170 669 674 174 171 f7f 160 72 Mo"'p's" u,lsr6sl 12 9 1 ! 3 t 2 I 1 I $3 Gil 14" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 Oe01 S Nt:4 1014.111 1, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7S Mae PM Cunenl oev 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 34 AA+w1 fllol 106001 (tell 0971 {1791 11421 (ow) (101 in IMI 1901 (021 37 I.AMn6 E4cen44 (7661 14561 14561 i6H) (3771 (ex 1551) 111 10111 (6651 A Rwydiq E404^u 036) (2101 (216; (207) 12211 (207) 1711) (2161 1210) (210 ' )I Ul Clowls F04 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 9 0 0 so Toul Nora og5N 11"W.01 I (!5701 (1641) (97631 IOU) (Sall 11666) (6R91 (9091 1'.6091 Val 1 47 0 6139 0 6 101^d11Q^' f 41 lnirty TnMI4n 0131 ISry (91 191 004) 0071 I1101 VIZ I+tn 11201 1241 1 , 1 42 FrMCAa4 T•4nnar Gil Fur 11131 1611 1061 'JEl 1161 1995 1& A UQ11 um 47 Tour 7'I'l11 M 111S1 (96) 197) 0901 11961 1202; 1211) (2i S1 (221) 12261 o 1 44 MN kwom6 6670 6210 910 (1134) (1134) 4751 (991 {k'0 '.1621 1132) 45 I it CPO two s Ow 4wwr 2 776 9 724 9 711 9.611 9 621 9.01 r 9,021 63.116 $3.252 U 262 h 44 wee4>tmy 4.A.a. M 69 11 L u 26 3 b IQ 02 Ir At Tory owrw8 12.924 12.702 9171 12 el $2900 9.09 9103 63.254 11272 9UA - ' . At Ta41 C11n EAcenw4 2.+64 1 . 361 952'1 9014 $3013 9.111 9J10 9.317 63311 9454 1 46 F Asa A9092 11 12 1! 7 2 u 3 4 ! 1 410.0( P11t'D4l 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 4 9 ' SO Cash Not 114014 aw 911 6317 151201 IS 113; 11119) !671 Me) 4591 d1101 $1 M'e AOINI*an1 6$% 000% 000`` 000% 450% 000% 470% 210% 000% ~ f f 1 lk , ( 14 26 ~I. 10 10 ' ~ x I '1/3(71616 ) COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTI ! i9SWNcE4+rdeOPerycr AaWI BuOael EY,m6lr At FY FF FY FY FY Cr U97 J90 199! 1999 an 2761 Nu 27.J =111 Yd1 I TOW Ammw1 CmlOmeh 26571 26404 216+3 21673 29063 79103 29 SA3 24 .v 70;,4 k: ' a Lav1m ClU Yards 151162 371 wo 313000 36061! 3"33S ]92129 396012 407%3 411167 1755'e 3 Ara CaEt YES I Cal 1a 34 27]7 1309 1321 1379 1336 13 e7 1370 1111 .1.6 All Min$417 CI,v 13263 16+67 15501 16240 26245 1710 11t 48 11103 13033 '9011 9ntra6o4 ale 7CannalcW Fen 1669 53.906 51.371 91.591 5+631 64.1]'1 64,175 $6 209 55.111 55361 1 Swcal PcauO a 11 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 SI+'4 Summ4ge 92 96 96 41 u 10 11 1 96 91 aINSa7 Gass 2 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 Taal OPen1Yq Pwmus 73.713 51019 $4 "a 64 "1 SAW $5024 Well $1302 13.4 4 15 460 R Ol0aLB6s6aw6 ~ 10 Acd'ancn 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 ! VI ONa 31 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 111mp V441 f1"weq 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 ParyC" 1 a ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 III INSN 76n" 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 9 0 1 19 ToMI Doom" 6 ONar 13111 9+ 021 64.441 64 .111 54'71 57 024 S7 066 $5.302 17.114 $1 460 n F m r 16 paymm Sul 1707 5107 1144 5171 1697 1921 1957 1960 1'610 j 17 f4pes 107 nl 116 12r 163 124 179 111 134 136 It r ,6 MinlManc/ 333 120 AN 354 361 366 375 363 311 391 11 $e NCn 312 291 all 760 769 270 276 261 217 791 i! fl. 20 I'SvINI 11 14 14 14 14 14 IS 17 15 '1 at SumEry I 6 6 6 6 6 1 1 1 1 22 T•srsgr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Omm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 MAP Calls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 6aE Oeq 0 77 77 17 11 N 16 U M 71 20 Me,:Ofim as 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 at AOnn Transfers Oem Gar 161 1/t 191 190 199 211 274 131 251 760 20 Oeolebalwn l5 230 id LU Ul L61 LSI 174 W Al 29 TpUl Ogrnnta E,w mi $1640 11,196 11111 $1,920 91,%? 12.055 1. t24 12.194 1.x4 52371 6100a010ism) 301nlrnsl 16301 1103 In 1127 $ul 1,11 f'24 f125 $131 1134 5175 11 NVOw,slrq w rof 77 00 48 2S is 4 17 4 4 fa 32 Otter Renmw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Oed SeNrta twell 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 Mdd Pod Cumamr RW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 3S Admn Furbrq (00001 1611 (179( 1111) Iltdl (%1 Il71 (961 1611 1641 111 r - 361andr1 EWrln 173077 123217 12,3271 (2,4651 12,220) a4,40) (1.1+91 126271 (2611) ra.S561 31 bgevlq Exm" 1"7 Iii! (12) 1791 (AM (45) {40) (41) 142) (416 36 Lame C101u11 Fwd a a 0 0 0 0 a 9 0 0 39 TDW Nonapennn9 R@,,v,, S It 11,4111 (%.6027 11317) (1479) 11226) '12.4501 1 u, 130) lu,629) 112614) 1u SO) t Op901909• mnw.m IQy 40 wlrty TramsfanW 1221 161 107 0091 Ilia U15) (111) (1221 (1251 11291 41 Fmrc1,4e hanpe, Omersl Fun Lw 1111 1673 201 um 11G31 113A 910E 11121 JA 17 TOW TyNtem Ow 1761, (73) (73) (161) 1212) 17167 (215) (2791 (m !2151 r 43 NN Inaema 15317) 1137) 103 Sol 1791 1300 6570 137 u9S 1011 u f" Owl" 6 01r4. 41.464 13116 51,021 14,417 64,641 11.721 (5.026 15,066 67.302 17.114 Is AM >r h /5 hrwsany MVtM 130 131 If0 142 130 124 140 133 137 144 { 66 ewa« Cure C>rnor 9 9 D SO 'b 70 !0 70 SO SO . 47 Told Rev mw 91641 61.156 $1,112 3417] SA 901 35202 97756 15.461 $owl is 010 r i 4110141 CASA Eu4r4n 14300 64 39 $4 it4 SAW 14151 15005 54 ?1? 15751 IS 323 55375 ' 47 Awn" cwm Cre~.nr 0 0 0 50 !0 Sal 10 50 50 !0 1 AS F.nd AIN4 toe 163 163 211 179 744 161 157 IN 200 j 42 DOW PIN041 0 a 0 a 9 0 a 0 9 0 1 50Cash N" It"" (:Aul !11111 1196 11111 5749 1196 1339 92,26 1279 1372 ' 7. fl F+'e A;uummr 1045 1005 000% 0005 150% 000`4 410.1, 2105 030% t'~• tr. t. u ~ t 27 W, I ®R 10 4 o - LANDFALL AM41 6ua041 EIn•a', FY FY Fr rr FV FY FY 995.vv:E.n~aearFpcla ;.242 ;346 LM 1373 2000 2]01 2702 M73 370! 2003 Tan, I P4fa4nl A' 10 LF +1160 11640 12W +0106 11379 16655 11935 '14,6 19891 4391 1 r C4m111Ta 10 LF Mass 66 565 So us 69 715 70,'61 11 122 12 900 N 122 76 so 1 71 Sot, 3 CWIQC1 to LF - 2403 2600 34W 1039 1200 1529 1715 9224 9665 10.169 4 OuWO, to LF 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 5Cash to LF low 10032 7034 1246 7463 1667 1917 6.313 1.727 9,165 1 1 6 011 a LF Six 5u xQ 30 312 ]26 331 335 in 113 ! 7 Total Annual riot, 103040 09,740 91354 103417 +05202 107.021 106 91'! 112023 $15271 116622 6 Lariat PI Y 5620 5660 4660 5610 5900 1120 9940 9950 1010 $1000 0,su1c6Batm141 9 Raf4anlal 7427 5466 KSd $156 4641 $577 16,11 1519 5667 9661 $665 10 C.amMn;Jl F4a5 2.307 2321 2 377 2.66S 2 220 2 "0 2.119 3621 2 616 2 $So II Cor1l'act F4tl 60 111 0 229 241 254 2" 217 306 331 12 OI.tw4 CAy 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Cal Fees 29, 747 2111 21) 224 136 249 261 796 307 14 0", Fall 11 aA ! 10 11 1a 12 13 t4 IS IS L4lCaaanryuf 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 9 Q 0 16 ?alai nl4+q Prr4nuaf S3 OW $3972 L3 M3 53556 62274 53577 0277 0171 62901 57173 11 A4 M Car flwitam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 State Su6nna4 11 la 14 11 20 21 71 22 23 25 H Asq- q Conine Peww4 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to Awah P•0 it 0 Q 9 Q 0 0 0 9 0 0 21 Ta141 004rs1rq 1 Omn 0 011 0 266 13097 U sit $3294 53 507 $3251 53 900 $3 932 $3116 Ocu9ra.fx 6 gl 22 PaY'o4 6293 WA S:IA 6259 U70 1361 6292 4404 $at$ 5429 23 54005 31 53 U 102 104 107 109 Ili 113 n! 214Aa✓lol 210 217 217 213 230 262 746 253 256 263 25 s.7r4n 210 3:9 321 404 412 421 429 626 44 4s! "IrwoKa ) S ! 7 1 1 t 1 1 1 27 953 ,f 95 toot 130 150 132 134 toe 140 144 uo 21 Co, ar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0m It 30 044 DW 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 31 A/4a,114n"a S 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 32 Alt, I " C. y,. 111? P.n G7 67 67 a7 20 14 t0 64 h 94 37 D40ao4tan 101 11 u 10 233 )01 N1 "a 505 SOS 34 Tow 0c4o'mq E.o4nln 11.071 II 162 5+.162 5+.468 91,$71 It a" 11,"1 51.66+ 11,062 12020 FI8zL5uLL.1Ft'ydUl 36 r101M 10301 Sn h0 5'! Ito 112 fU 114 5+s h0 117 M Noiti4 lnrq Ire,ost 211 to 21 32 34 a 14 10 10 37 P 00'42 Aor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 cIw sanc6 Intel"! 16011 (47s) (479) 1x301 (457) (456) 14031 (509) (am 1367) 39 War Pod Currant PAL. 0 131 17) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 40 AA*hn Fwhill 106001 (I X) (2161 142) 1112) It") (1361 0291 034) 113r (141) At IAUC4,an4ouf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 elm P4marwm 0 (45) 1451 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Clo urS l Pmlclolu14 L1311 AM (2261 12062 MA :2511 am (2m as iII'!1 l 4 row Nonaci lnq ipe'l ul 155141 (39311 111101 11766) Wool Is 779) 156911 M211 (SIM) 11662) II 001aY10.I7 lOnA a! CJLIIN 7,11"1114,11 ,11 n out (44) (901 1901 17151 1252) 17601 12671 12751 12171 12121 44 11g1Uw T'an15.141 Go l I UA L32u U" {1131 L= 4149) un LIM LISA am r tan T xalom 0,A Coot (222) 1222) 13661 1364) 4043 (796) (4311 1441) 46491 AS 9M Ica" SI,US 5963 5753 1"S 6210 $136 loa+ 1762 1762 1711 r 411" t3Fr1'r0, alr ft..r+4 Uott 0266 0097 53570 M294 53517 0250 $3900 $3 fu $3190 1 SO ii 4 NJ 44.4-Ae 222 >a 44 44 46 u 0 21 26 u 0 it Total P4.enu4 $3 293 "311 $3 140 63521 $3340 !3111 %3301 $3925 0,058 U "1 52 ?0141 Col EI1:41,a1 U.461 93201 132" 62467 0390 9.130 62297 51034 54 a31 93 H2 "j Flats Allots 3 102 1;2 162 67 27 42 62 u so SA low It 530 6,19 IM 1162 694 1 014 11! 1261 7279 1 211 ' SS P4PWn'4nt 6h'tK 1Lan41 2F ISO 'S0 100 100 51 0 0 0 0 50 Cash Not Inatome 1606 1113 11661 135) {13D1 111121 1L0 1!.1091 +6261 du 51 said As,.ftr IN 4901 2304 230'. 2YY. 1m 2113% 2101 200% . Lalmfa P.:u._IJ0 ® S 1 P4L04nrJl 17+ 00 532 00 12290 $3S 10 S3141 131 Di S29 l7 US 20 174 r7 532 59 2 ca'it"l l 9700 0112 53112 136 76 531 37 W 11 1" As $5 10 wit $2 ss 3 cmraa 626 34 12654 W" $A 539 77 W40 9' 01 $3t IS 132 42 W 10 to 71 4 01,1,44 C,ry 12634 130 S2 11v u too 17 W M U! 73 111191 13121 136 ce too 53 S Cal IA.91 129$3 12904 4"64 1110 it 0+29 5310 Wu 11431 11% OF 57/7s 1 dnu CR7 cool. t30 00 130 17 sk IF 175 14 W os 626 14 627!1 1713) 439 I4 $3192 1 28 4 a)ad';tn~:ti x 10 ;~x1❑ [Amu ( I calm" pagcad Trryo 7,61 2SC3 75a7 2516 25'17 7556 1127 7791 4561 75,5 2571 2elt 2614 2.127 7791 7961 ` RICYCIING Amal EvaJ11 Elurn4lo FY FY fY FY F'I FY try 995wVOfrwndr.ROtire 3392 Liz 7396 :399 2006 2007 2x1 M M 2394 ~ ' I tons Yn0 W4sr1 1.196 7051 6972 7159 1727 7499 ?676 7.971 1293 6622 2 Two N4Mpopor 1.736 122S 2649 2050 2061 7112 2,1u 2.196 2252 2]09 Tong CsnJbu d 1,070 0 400 266 292 29, 701 704 316 124 j 4 Tors WhIl I ComWlor Paper 31 7 1 ! ! S S S 6 1 ! Tone Glass r 004r 213 m 22S 162 164 16? 169 114 116 193 6 Tone AWm I Silo) Tm w JO! 0 i5 Y a 21 as ]9 49 7PecyclW TonnaOo 10377 1657 10.!02 5700 99M +0116 10332 10.701 11,064 1,462 Awapo P1v11o9/Ton 9191? 11719 9]040 s72.10 15110 93611 937N 93972 4166 BmO0W9 9 dice Peer so u S2 10 10 to s0 so b sn 10 Ca dbarJ 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 AWAmes 2 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'F 12 Moror 04 0 1 I D 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Oro" 01 Stn 39 30 72 71 63 Is 9e 107 111 (If 14 Y1re Wash Fxoomlq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1S 111914 lbal MRF RMnoe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +6 Cormewc l MRF 9"me 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 li CWIMIA Me$ RovMw a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 R4sdar"I F,Mrq U6 250 216 20 an 237 211 216 2N 216 11 col ~mal Fw6ry SBA u 71 31 u 43 !0 43 42 61 20 Total Rory:er'q 11"Im a 956? 4766 5567 9316 934 $771 S318 4360 9371 9379 O face064e 71 P8,M4 vro4 Stop {n7 417 1149 5135 $156 5+67 1,61 4573 $176 22 3,401,19 13 11 t9 1? V +1 It +9 19 19 1) Ma of"" C 63 63 62 67 54 63 61 66 69 24 SON Cos 67 36 34 N 44 AS AS a? at 4q 2! 11693rd. I 7 2 3 3 3 3 ] 3 21 Swwry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 270m1r. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 09 er 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 146[1111100,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 70 540 Debt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` 31 odw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 Ad+M Tnnalen Gen G0,, 30 34 34 33 35 P N 42 M 4? ' 34 Tow N1gluq [ACA ISIS !46 S34' 9353 1737 5341 $762 5374 9367 400 1411 1 mnoG,o w Fwnuft 35 Irrem" 114VI 12 93 41 u sa u u 93 0 93 3e Nw op/'Flry mlorost 0 1 13 1 9 , . 1 1 f 37 00101 A" 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Dow So,we Imoro' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0wr o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ' 40 Aden F"N (0600) 171 (41 4) (a) UI (3) (3) (31 (3) 13) ' it 09)4r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0lrr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a3 Q14r 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 Tow Nwot4nnrq Revenoll (411 !5 19 IS 14 Is01 13 so s0 U OnvA3oGlacsfmlQu9 141 4% M,IM T rs4's ON 0) 101 101 (a) (4) 0) (4) (a1 (4) 46 0tnor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 Tout TIa12,41 00 11) (01 10I 0) (41 ',4I 0) (4) a) IA) . 3 M Not IrFOnN Of 124 1+1 4111 15 U 1126i fury 14331 I►STI ( li 47 1,I 001"4 4 Ocr a." 5761 9366 1363 9311 1354 6371 1346 5360 %311 9379 44 wrarary ae4no4 2 f 1A 1 2 2 1 3 f It A; To41 Pnm~1 5369 937! 9776 9327 1]61 9314 9354 m 9374 w5 _ W Total essn Eaonsal 4361 9375 1774 1327 &361 1714 9354 m 9314 931! S1 F1od Asia'$ 11 44 w 12 36 12 17 t2 12 12 52 Dos P kr%l 0 Q 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 ~ 93 G1N Net at Ineeme 10 93 to 1o b 93 b so W b a , 1 1 ! 1 29 V 0 1 t 1. 41 1~ 10 ' Asti I 1~ •4 k r } ADMINISTRATION 4;n,4 Bua9el Esnr41e FY sv FY M re C, 995WN~Eivl a 4el''e 1391 Id91 1351 LM 2719 2001 20Q2 2= 2'!d 145 9olftn.u I Saga W1Pe Tars4r 5106 1347 fi17 $406 5309 b72 UOS Ule S 2 V'aeo•/ C4om1 t•4nster D 0 0 0 0 0 D 0~ 0 EIWN Tnrs'er 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 4 Ws1N Trams, 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 D S wsslewuer fgnthr 0 0 0 D 0 C 0 0 0 0 6 ►roperry Managerm 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 a 7 FIW S"cls TgMhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 4, I0INN1 Gam 0 0 0 4 Q 0 0 2 0 9 D TVN Pevlnres S1o6 f54} 1542 1401 9UD W2 9709 5316 U24 U00 r. auazasy^ue G ' 10 P4Yme 943 ule u+e MID $226 $217 u4o uU p51 4Y1 1 11 Su00uee 1 1 9 9 9 IO to ID 10 10 M4nW A" 9 IS 1S 12 11 q 11 1) 14 14 17 Senncn 22 127 t22 b 07 N N 40 41 ' 14 N116MOI 0 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 IS 90,67 10 I 1 1 / 1 1 l 1 1 , tI O,NN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,70PN o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aan.I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'I 19 /b Dept 1 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Peun.n• CVtnrJenry 0 0 0 ISO t50 150 ,b ISO 150 ISO +n 21 Abnn IgtVo,s Gen Car 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 DMOOS n q Q Q D 9 9 0 9 9 4 21 Tow Ooealnq Eeoenus 9760 5763 &W $421 9437 5445 MU 5462 $470 1,17111 6lo06leeenof+JEmausl 241011,151 esl {6 4001 b b b b to to b b to b ZS NOnOW/IA/ Inlereel 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Peunn CmlevrIcy 0 0 a ISO ISO ,SO ISO ISO 1b ISO at Ow SenN o,tvest 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 2/ Mdd Pod Cunem Per 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 OINer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 lanal.l Emenu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 01 DoW tsw4nce EV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 32 wvlm V.ofV 0 1211 1211 0 a 9 9 0 a 9 u tow Nwxoenw,a P4+enun I to full ;ull SIb fIb 91b 1150 4150 silo 1+30 QRwhw T hagn .eI 11 U" Tn givers OA 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Oiw 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 TaW ?,aMNS GO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a r 17 NN Neerlw SM S152 1137 4127 k 1 121 u $4 64 $4 16 It" 0441,0/ 1 Dew a." 5106 9342 Sul 1401 1119 SU2 tJ06 $311 ►074 5112 ~ Dl NVeoenr9 eMM 0 0 0 150 ISO 130 ISO ISO ISO Ib 40 Tool Pe, N4 a 6706 1542 SS12 (556 M69 6472 6456 $464 W4 f/u 41 foul Caen Eep1^sn 5306 9342 15,12 9556 6Y9 9472 3455 1466 6174 5463 , 12 Faea A1UI1 t 2 7 2 2 27 2 4 4 4 i 41 Oetl Pmcwel o D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u Pe01T it Doti E'4nrs 2! 130 IN 125 SO 4 0 4 9 4 , I. CIA. IS Cue Not 1:40" b so so b b to b s0 b b 1 r: x• F ~ r7 j } r ti~Il 1 ~1 1 i '^r r `I 30~ r I1 I. ,F111 //~Y yrreJ• M1n + .t~ ' N 4 ~I ~e Ir 15 ~ I 31W 1 0 0 , ,a.mlwl o • . I SOLID WASTE - WC, RecytLng . Contract Vawme 4110 "it E61-rw,e 8^.I to rr rv n rr r. KSWWC4 . 40 VA ray 01,111,01 U2 7976 IM LM 2= 1741 27.3 23u 2741 ?>s 57} so / So PV. OR17aLEkp~tvl6uC{ t RIsdonuai 12644 12144 uso I 2716 wu uact 12410 us's 12121 512, 2 Cort7mer6al 2793 10'1 4.440 out 4,1al 4J 57 x795 4.131 4111 2317 1 L"111 M Sol 307 471 197 522 $0 590 933 177 4 001de Contract 0 La"In 0 0 a am 1.195 1.171 1,117 t 074 1 052 1724 S 0,0vas C",AQ F•e1z1r4 F1e 14\7 0 0 0 24 4 U U 41 60 4 6 RKyCIIng 61 33 7S 13 Y 1A 111 177 130 IM 7 a 0 4 0 4 9 4 a 4 4 a Total Operating Revenues 96 me S7717 S15o6 IS 649 19.330 so 134 1.1431 79164 1" Slows 9fn&f Roy Ouss 9 Resdenual 33 21 H 32 34 34 3s 36 17 31 10 Commercul 11 a 0 a 4 0 o a o a It Landhe a a a o 0 0 0 a o o 12 Adminutrallon a 9 4 9 0 9 9 9 0 0 13 Total Opening A Othar Ravi M.nO 1724 11937 M,7at 1131) 11379 51454 so wo as.so7 1'0.06 7 QQI!LUYIg F.e•nlas 1 14 Payrca 6267 U244 U2" 2119 Us" 2.757 4214 12.925 93013 1.7.103 15 Supohes 732 312 312 NS 151 165 414 464 493 503 If Mamnaance 114 1'0 710 TI In 7?9 723 737 12 717 175ernc e9 In a14 014 013 719 105 In IH $31 W 'J in s0nnce '1 31 31 31 34 3s 37 M M H 19 Sundry 107 140 140 193 in 115 re" 11s 164 112 20 Transfer o a 0 0 a I a 2 4 6 21 WC4 Ceptal Fee 0 a all In 49 434 us 317 120 20 WCI Proces3'ng Fes a o a 271 54 in 196 627 w 194 21 Bad 000) 17 47 40 30 39 35 u 75 M 34 22 Rosaries • Ccnl4ngaNy 0 0 0 ISO ISO 150 ISO tso 150 130 23 Adri Tnnehn Om Gov 191 511 541 154 SY 171 154 $07 730 714 r 24 Depredation W ail 221 242 422 542 Set 111 W W ( S Total 09er1i ElpensM 14)12 $5241 15233 MID" $7025 17211 47.11 s7, 727 st737 61.0M 26 Doomfirl; Inlenfl silt 130 420 2193 1230 1230 9332 SIM Uri 24 27 Non-0petaing Interest 24 M Y Y 21 40 10 1 41 It 21 Resehel • eonengerlcy is" 0 a ISO ISO ISO w ISO Ile ISO 29 Debt Service Inhlrest 15417 1471) (475) Iga7 (4511 I3321 14221 13131 13421 ',1471 30 DeM I11uancI Expense o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Other Transer Expense 0 1261 (211 0 0 a 0 O a a 32 CoM. Motor Pod 0 131 131 0 0 a a a 0 0 33 Dea RNnemeM a (111 I/s1 0 0 o a o 0 0 33 La710N1 C101416l PoNtloeurs UA 1224 (22L ILL am JA 1Lb 131b 12311 {21.11 ' 34 Total Nonoperalinq Pevenues IExt 11 Ye 154) Mai) 1241 !!2721 11321 42507 12127 4121 1!291 ^ Q46iaafla.113t1{11I11Q5Q1 33 VI&ty Trans7erl Out 11041 0051 11061 1411 (4157 Idw 11+47 154) 15331 11411 ' • 36 FranNle Fee am M 13173 A" 610 1214 13713 (22]1 137E UK ' 17 Total Translers ON 13531 1"1 1344 (1011 (3021 A547 IOU) 190) 11061 (W7 1 36 Net InCOTe Ulu at NJ 11450 11,4 $1733 d.1p0 947 5401 $w 1100 39 To1a3 Ophat,nq IS OtMr Perlnus So ISO 1774 11937 so 102 Ml) to 370 Is 6" 19520 11 SRI s10 no J 40 Norlopenong P.: muse to" 233 314 403 404 NI 392 no 430 04 I 1 41 Pesari • Cap'.), Corslluct4oa 9 9 a 30 so la s0 n to 9 I' • 42 Total Permit se I'1 1+571 11154 IIJ 54 11,21 1191 19 Ke Is 961 $10 011 si oin ~ ~ • ►6 43 70141 Cash Expenses 54420 1,45 1747 MV2 top" 1144 33AM so Ul 19622 1.0 YS ' W AtIoNes • Captst ConstnxIon o 0 0 5o so so So Y Y 90 4S Fl zed Alsals too 322 32) 399 29 MO 717 262 211 in ~ 6 DOW Porldpal 5.10 630 6'31 642 an 176 104 in 730 1,11 atAlpay LT Deal 110Clnc 21 ISO 130 at so Is 0 0 0 0 it P4081 LT Dad Land 2s M 1!0 1o 1m 300 11 9 0 9 49 C2sn Not Income u.1$4 1'4 7309 254 $141 1423 1419 and 64"1 1114 ~ I SO RsSoNes Sim 1417 1701 111 11491 11N 93.215 U.002 s3001 93.161 31 it ---r , , 25 x Q 32 x I r LYh low" ~ t 1 ME$0Df 1 l SOLID WAS;C WO Raleronrq . Co'nIla vow's "SNWCt . 100(0 Ta" CVI Acl1,a1 11.0"I Sfli'1.A fiI Fr FY Fv FY FY FY 1 1942 1m 1991 1199 2tbA 2001 Nd,2 20C3 27'1 2:A5 I Tara, A %j~C.11o 4n 192620 190176 196650 20241S 203015 203613 220215 ?,A its 705415 2%115 2 D1011. C. "An 1",111 Ilion 11190 61063 16063 61364 90.725 92066 93467 qS 601 911,199 1XIM 3 AvgcvTc YtNr Cvsl 045 046 046 0" 013 045 046 017 ON 019 AAvg Will Pi Cop 1300 13 DO 1300 1300 1300 1300 1300 1300 1]00 1740 ~6fi{ Fa 1011 S RIS44rbil Wt Fast 2.611 52.62] 1646 1.764 1.177 1.779 12711 1195 0103 U196 I v 6 Ra sa#eAI PO,4 0 12 22 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 I i SMIN - Gnu 16 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 i , - e stato SY N" u a 19 23 a 23 u a 26 as 9 ToW Gl7arat" loom wet 2.645 1.661 16e7 12.766 12,791 1602 1.610 1511 1127 u.921 Ome[lamm 10 SAA of Pduu Sags 29 29 20 2S as 26 27 21 M 21 - 11 At717aancss e 1 1 6 1 e 1 9 1 P _ 17 Pror Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I, F,"IMIq so 31 31 11 14 Is 1S Is IS 1S ' 14 slum IOnu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 is Dow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 tow OOSnonq i Oln4, 2.736 !2.124 U 747 12 630 1241 u 1S1 1.160 52.669 1.179 x.914 H►1111N 629 11,197 5697 11,106 !1.110 (1,111 11 NIP 11 245 1126] 11321 ' 11 S„pmu 141 163 163 195 224 229 233 236 243 241 tOrantanamA to 93 N 110 n2 p14 111 n9 111 121 ,f 20 54ncas 97 105 105 179 1113 197 90 191 196 202 f'r 21 wourancat 4 1 1 12 12 12 12 13 13 0 n Svn4r7 1 4 1 A 1 4 4 4 A 4 23 Trlyda 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 1 S C 24 Oleo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 WCI Csou Fss 0 0 0 U 69 w 59 51 23 14 26 WC1 Proaessl fa 0 0 0 36 71 10 q 116 h M 21 Sae DON 0 16 111 12 14 14 14 14 It 14 21 Adore T7n611111 Go OW 239 269 269 261 211 291 316 335 355 376 - 29 Owsc,alw 1 if 14 91 23 u u b a as 30 TOW 00"I'mq lawsat 1124 11.!77 !1.517 31174 1.136 u, 195 42260 1.329 1.374 1,1" NO0cmglft 0B6F IT Im4ml 16301 111 151 sit SM 170 170 170 970 111 113 32 FAM49va" Ir1a,sm }2 1 9 s 1 2 0 0 1 0 33 ONIlr Rev 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 DON Ssrocs In18414 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lS slda Pod CunaM A" (91 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Adwn iundng 106001 101) 11") (71) I/S) (671 1941 176) 1791 (111) 181) [ 313an44 lpnsa (3611) (454) (411 (131) (7091 )6911 III 115)) (737) (9071 I 31 poor.Mrq low" (131) 121101 (lisp (67) IT in IS?) III) IS4) 1301 PH I 29 carom Cnwn Fero a 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 v 40 Tow Nw4venat" Rsrsnuq f 11!301 15644 ($713) IS640p (1603) ($7b) 1160'5) 13117) 15M 11936) OMMila"AlIllIltt JMA1 t 11 V661y TIASIM OA (34) 491 Ill 194) (%I (991 (102) (106) 1101) 11111 12 FrImade P" W7 am VD Low {631 3851 LU LU IM 1111 43 Tow Flndla Out (1151 196) 1961 1175) (loop (1131 (1151 )1161 lily 011 44 me eama 1670 1210 sill (1159) 1120) (1311) (m (6+64) 15 m) 1Is"i As I" opo,'" 1 0-w ll rw 2,231 $.724 12.717 12,910 1.141 12.151 1AGo V "ll 1119 u 974 b 46 No vat," llmmii M 10 91 it 11 29 21 11 23 41 Tow Rn MVA 9124 1.714 12 631 12693 $.112 1.1123 1.930 19.0 u./31 u04? 1 ` uTxal Cafe 6r.4rlsl 9,154 1561 sas19 1,0" si110 932111 12" !3302 114111 33626 As F~Isa Alsatt it 19 12 7 2 611 3 4 1 6 q 1o Oun Pnrc4:a1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 s0 C66N Not 91eame 6110 9217 Still 151461 iu51) (6311$ (S]60] 111"2) lla"I 6s79) $1 Rail 0,41ftenl 133% 000% 0 Par. 0%1% ow. 000% OWN 010015 30s% ti 1 1 32 { 7;~ 1 15+ 75 -V, ~1 32 x 4 e , .r . o 1 COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTE WCI li . CarlnQ VOV ACw► &.Op i Etnmre FY FY Fr For FY FY FY - 99SWKI . 40000 ton, W1w 3392 1396 3950 1399 ~ UL 2993 2GL3 m 3005 I Toni Amur Cldmmen 2651 24404 21541 21193 29063 29303 11143 29713 30021 30763 lLAda4l CWc Y4N4 353162 37S 000 173000 271.464 201148 263259 253454 241370 250,731 254342 3A.1 CAC Yes I CW 1231 1537 IS 31 0" 974 191 158 124 1135 -147 4A.14re 001 C,sl 13263 16467 16411 16240 162" 11235 16231 11229 16734 11395 Cg malkpIN1u S Ca.wCrl lees 13.189 331123 $41" $4510 $4$49 04664 14,)!1 14,164 $4.Id 14.951 d Souol PCew 0 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stan S.Thal" 92 or 10 71 77 10 $9 E6 10 11 IONSAI Gau a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 TOW O04ntm1 Pwenue $3.793 94019 $4440 S4 U l 54 "a 1 64 ?S7 54,195 54.634 1411a 15 022 ~ 10 App,nc., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 It OW41 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 PW Yea, poccr, 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 13 Fl"lnq 7 7 7 62 73 90 101 111 114 117 14 bnnn I Grim 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 111oW Opealrur 6011141 11111 54071 64"1 54 741 547" $4047 64131 14$41 149$4 $5.130 to Patrol $"1 $702 1102 $046 $671 Sao? $924 1357 $No 11.010 17 S,4vaes 107 Ila III 121 121 129 121 t3l 134 136 16 1,04olom"ll 3SS 320 320 354 >61 36a 375 363 391 1" 19 54NCtl 300 291 791 240 265 270 216 281 717 253 ° j. t01Mu' l 11 14 14 't 14 t4 15 1S 1$ if 71 Sundti 1 6 6 6 1 6 a 1 7 7 71 Tm,,i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Dow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .a 1NCt Caput Fa 0 1 0 184 3" 311 119 363 192 106 15 WCI 11,an4u1 Fes 0 C 0 126 264 776 ISE 305 177 730 . 24 bad Dept 0 23 22 I1 t9 19 M 20 20 20 27 Ahr.n T 1nden GM GOY Ise 191 111 190 In 711 224 237 751 761 26 Dew"I*A 36 111 w 3.12 113 LIZ 151 Sag lu 142 h 29 TOUT O"vin1 Erpenu4 51640 11736 $1.751 12232 U$20 uon $2.165 02873 12,160 UIPS1 301-14.411 ISWI 1105 516 1113 1106 1111 1119 1,20 $121 1122 5121 31 "o Om,atnp W4,e41 75 60 " 25 1 12 7 2 13 7 1 1 32 Oda A" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Ded Senee IrnnP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 stow ►•,ot Cumenl Aw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3S Adnr1 FV6N 106001 104; 1129; 11164 (1331 P3) (147) (111) (123) 1tXI 11301 j X LAMA EAW64 12,307) 12.321) (2.377) (.158; (2,075) it "?I (I.Wd) 11.133) It 1m) (2.1961 37 A*:r gCorer" 119) (93) 1721 (192) (411) (41) (4201 020) (m In61 34 LAMA CWw,o F1,M 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 TOW 4onco41vq Pt"enwe it (7A11) (2 A03) 1123431 167, ISO !u 501t (73291 i023ri1 167,753) 162,0"1 1123461 ~I 60WimY Tnm m Ovt (21 Ie) 6) (1441 0001 (154) 11591 11641 OW (173) es F„e.,1141 Fn {181 1621 Al Ll= (3m2 L3111 0.141 Lm L127J 633L 42 TOW T1441411 ON P61 1711 2132 12471 (256) (2061 (7191 12$41 12105 (21) ' 43 Not exoeu 1"17) 112521 5163 (71St tow) 16"21 16464) (5464) 41201 (17481 ix ' " 7x4 Cp'," 6 hr Pe" 51116 14021 94 447 $4.743 14194 14,041 54 I'm 54148 44,149 65,139 a3 ryaw.44„e 44.4.,44 00 136 170 130 104 131 123 123 136 121 4 "ae•ew none crrra 0 9 0 50 59 50 SO 'A 50 50 . 46 Tout sari ur'6 $4 1S7 54 111 14 177 $4 no 55.021 65061 ".111 15.173 ` 461oui Car E,tvr4e $4 390 14.436 $4,414 15314 $5579 65561 Is $01 13113 ".371 '.4.505 • 47 e1l.rl.1 . c.ona cldr m 0 0 0 50 So 50 60 50 50 50 4a P,"Assert 148 163 163 216 171 241 1All 190 102 too 49 Dee1 Pm lcsl 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 50 Cum Not kw" 4S4";, 112910 1196 1"a'I r%xI 115601 !15721 I$A$4) (1150) 102)11 S1 Pre AAA:meri 6044 900". 000'. 000% 000: 007. 000•. 000111 10351 1 '4 1 I 33 t 1 J,~6'{h 4'r Sra 1❑ r3~ ?X,10 4. umu a LANI7FNI A, "I Bw79e1 En~rvale FY h n FY r, FY FY j 395WWCI . a0 300 T;rS 0u. .39: 3390 :346 1349 27v0 1171 i0Q2 2L0 200! 20175 1 Pndenpat 10 LF '1 No 17040 11540 11003 11049 16'94 11.167 11029 19.+02 1966) 2 CO 1,41 IO LF % 415 6e 615 61665 Sa 995 5165) 75.714 $4631 54 3`49 SS NS S N 071 3 Contncf w IF 2 303 7 600 3,4M 6 079 I Ito $ us 1.163 o Y4 9663 10.169 40uleM IG LF 0 0 0 11.100 31.200 33300 32400 31100 31600 31.600 5Cash to LF 10604 10032 7.034 7246 7"463 7667 1.917 1313 6.129 9,165 1 CAN, to LF 321 III 000 309 Al 1. Z 006 235 310 343 7Total Annw1 Tons 103362 99.740 97354 107697 123,161 123.452 122736 123020 125654 126.765 I Lalldpl Pate'CY 5620 4660 1110 1110 $900 1920 1940 1360 top 11000 t - Ocidua:bG AP,, c'0 9 Polsowtlal Fees 5766 $451 5456 1757 1709 Mae 1136 1757 17S7 1907 I0Car+nea611 Flo$ 230) 2.771 232) aIse 1075 1Ia7 1904 1113 I.am 2,191 II Conlon Fees 60 116 N 729 241 254 266 217 306 331 12 Weds C•T1 0 0 0 6'2 I,IS3 1065 1077 tMe 1,012 1,'19 13 Coo Fop 297 341 its 213 224 23e 749 041 am 301 1400w Fees '1 24 9 IQ 11 12 12 y 14 1s 15 Macalahacus Q 0 0 9 Q 0 0 Q a a t6 TOW OPOMI q Peverve6 9.060 9272 9.0/9 13979 $4.414 14162 $.241 54.166 9,214 54.947 CgW FId104A1 t 7 Ad In COrswaean 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II Slaw SwMrga it 14 14 41 63 62 N u 63 rA 79 Pecyclnq Coalran Aa.rwe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0.'aao eaww Pv 'w a" 4v a Q 0 26 N 13 43 il 40 y it TOW 006 req a OtM• S3071 M IN 9 092 $ 044 $ 327 $ M6 $.350 M 291 $.319 Moss DU M0.LA09043 r 22 Parse Sass 1706 We w9 970 SMI 1392 said $14 $29 27 Similes S1 63 67 102 13 IS 91 99 101 Ica 24 Marl",,ce 210 217 217 233 no 207 211 215 all 224 25 Semcas 210 329 329 404 261 266 761 251 259 MS M Irwnnce 3 5 S 1 1 7 1 7 7 7 17 Sandh 9S 130 130 ISO IN 31 153 111 137 too 20 Omar 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 29 NCI C.p4a1 Flo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 30 WCI Pm ssnq foe 0 0 0 64 204 ale 224 233 265 IS? 31 Sad D"A 0 7 2 a 2 2 2 2 2 2 M AyniTnnele's Gen a:c. 60 11 $7 67 7) 74 79 $ a9 $ ' 13 Damnaoon >y 11 51 110 203 212 303 390 402 9Q7 34 TOW 09en5rq EWneS 11 0)t 11,162 U, 1-2 N.S7a 51,63S It No 61,761 11.$43 11.199 11,1142 i Na00peu0opBahgn'n cE tn,L] f\ 5lnlenv text III 110 s+5 111 SM 113 614 113 111 $17 94 76On.OFen" 1r!an11 211 11 2e 32 14 23 6 1 it 37 Other Pam, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 6 0 - 36 DOW f411NO'ca M81411 !sat) (1751 (475) 14301 (4571 (3321 (422; 130) 1121 (431 - 30 MO4e, Poo euneh: Rev 0 131 (7) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Adnn FundnQ 106001 0361 (7161 (242) 8221 (12q 11341 (109) 11121 111@) (I I@) at MUOUM0041 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 Dew A46nnym 0 (ASt 145) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 C105U14 I P011CImun LU 17201 1226) (2A 11111 am 1219) 4A {2311 Illl7 1 44 Total WrtOnnnhq IPev61w1 11614, 119401 4950) Islas IVIS) 136501 (1771) 11695) (16701 37601 C611a004-Incs1u5.1CaW as Vh1er TnMl/n CM N) 1301 1921 12201 4261 IM 1240) 1241) 12541 (2621 46 fnrtcnra Fee 1119) a" 11011 UAU UTAI 11693 11771 L= U711 M " 47 Teal Tgnsnn Out 1160) (21, 11 12271 (3111 (405) !6011 (412) (Al?) 142SI (4621 11, As Not lncema 11.225 1342 5740 11,407 11,707 It W 0 "1 11,335 Sl3N Ila9S ^n 49 Ira Ceanery l 11V I 9 206 9 097 V 014 14 577 14 256 $ 39 so n' $.710 95060 ' 50 +v a4 M.N rr.a•ue 277 L if 43 20 a 23 L I2 13 S S1 TOW Paaue 13291 13314 1714s $.067 12540 34.'102 9.273 12.311 $.367 11010 S2 TJW Cash [,cartel uAs7 13201 93221 9,445 M 9291 9712 9357 Most 14.031 W F,,ed Uses 1 102 102 147 IS a1 42 k 54 96 1 S4 Dew Pnn " 530 99 639 602 443 175 704 TA T31 1.111 ' 55 Pe06)n'an1 IKl c IL~m 21 ISO ISO so 100 100 b 0 0 0 54 Cash hit Ir4e" SAM 111] 19201 942 11.000 Lott 9991 1951 We SLQN 1 S) PA'a A,bp,Slrvnr 4 My a 304 270% 2 206E 220% I toss. 6 toy 2004% S Untila.PAAlS _120 111asderlW 121$3 171041 $205 13931 13835 Mill 13971 13100 14562 1 2caw "lvi S3700 $3700 93766 us 17 17105 1A13 $3310 13201 9611 7 Contras in 34 104 47 121 72 9060 $3107 17114 13242 13710 W 71 /Ounda Crr 10434 13044 62000 12046 IV It 9131 at 12 $3a 21 in fa 1 I Cash IA,gi 17967 12977 530 s9 9129 131ld IIIN 13377 INot 11471 , { 1OPar C10 Dews 13000 13011 13514 oil" We 13115 13113 13914 $3913 E 34 l ,1,1 n w r1` 1 ~r' A ISM -DAN • a ♦ O , Y is 14dY/q I "."--•r..:r_~~,,_ 3s :s.3 sxe :5:: r';3 242:e :;525 441115 ~ 13366 15020 IS 1% 21'93 23525 71206 i4 Is RECYCLING AO"I Bu09et E4Lntare FY FY FY FY FY FY FY 99SWOYCI . 40000 Tone 01. IM 1946 Um 1N4 Lr9G IIB3 2909 t0C3 2201 2d` I Ton Ya,l Nate _ 7.196 7 052 6 972 1 159 7 321 7 939 7 676 7 976 1713 6 U. 7 Tone te•spep4r 1,736 1275 2649 12.401 12.766 15.165 17,105 16967 11576 20095 3 T1ae C4lmard 1,070 0 400 1,1111 1,193 2.174 2,401 2,666 7743 2621 r 4 Tong Whne-N cwvr ter Paper 31 7 7 30 31 36 42 47 b ,9 S Ton4 O4,u 0Wr 233 Me 225 979 1000 1 223 1 351 1 500 1943 567 $Tong Alum r 31" r TA 310 106 56 313 220 266 349 ]J2 m 396 [ 7 Pectow Torwge 10.377 1652 10 502 22.925 23 147 26 506 20 669 31 We 32.501 33 54 f{` OSwage PllITon 11917 11319 1475 1541 $546 1943 6539 ISM IS32 AeaOUn 6 GOCe Paper t0 u S2 10 t0 16 10 t0 U to 10 CIr:11:16wd 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I ACV4"1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 12 1Nolw 04 0 1 1 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 13 O DO 00 SIa4 39 30 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Yard wale Proca4+n9 0 9 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 15 Re144n5a1 Flo" Pwow4 0 0 0 11 Is is is 15 1$ 15 11 Con1n4ae1 Prod,cl Rweaue 0 0 0 67 73 90 101 11l 114 n7 I7 Conrraa PnOx.1 Ptlrwlw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 II Raaenosr F,,I 130 250 216 67 71 61 61 so 30 19 11 Cenwnet,al Fr4N 366 13 u M2 616 415 020 130 M IN 20 Total Ra Omg Revenue 1367 136! 136.3 1632 7500 $501 1596 1603 1390 1290 ~ r ' GLItL'dQfaNrldtl II v 21 Pav'o1 1149 11 t2 1172 1149 170 113 113 177 179 162 92 SucOIIa 23 1d 10 17 6 6 6 1 6 1 23 41aetavann r7 63 63 62 1 7 7 7 1 7 - 24so"as 67 31 36 4 0 111 45 46 q 41 25 m/ore^ce I 2 J 3 2 ! J 7 2 7 26 sv4'y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 01Mr - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Omer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 WC1 Cawta1 Fa 0 0 0 217 am 436 435 an 217 120 30 844 Dew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 31 Orr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 32 Adnn Tu41e1 Gen. Gov. 30 34 34 33 33 37 31 42 4 41 33 Dep,eoaw 0 3a 26 x 33 v am 1m 63 11 34 Tow OSwurq C41vn4e4 63f W7 1353 1551 M31 1631 1646 1655 144 1353 i l\ y0a00f7Y[41 R...n._. rE...,w1 1 , 361ntareu 1630; u 10 t7 k 730 121 121 {H S26 431 3e Nom Ov-,awq Inlwat 0 0 U T 1 3 1 0 7 0 37 01044 Pw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 Ow 54NKO 1n1e1e1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 390mw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Adrrvn Fun6^9 100011 131 (A1 19) (2) 12) 1.21 121 121 12) 121 410544 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ill 0", o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Omw 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 ToW Nor"e,i" Pwenua N1) tS 19 16 710 720 W 1M 121 1tt 45 Mimi twins r9 ON U) (01 101 12) (2) !21 12) 12) (2) 131 As 07141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 Total twilee Gal 111 (01 101 (2) (2) 121 12) 12) (2) (3) 1 r . M Not lnonm4 1'1 121 116 1,117) 11231 11731 (1201 112d) 3") ',1211 r t 47 the )w2,J I Oe« Fwr♦4 1361 4361 1363 1572 1500 Ism? 1591 1003 1710 1291 j 4e vra.,~e 44444.44. 2 6 1! 6 32 21 26 u IS u 1 49 TOw Parf 1369 433 L376 1511 kill 1617 1625 1131 1411 1321 + 1 1 SO Toroo. CaAS Erpen4a 1.369 "?1 137/ 2541 1012 1617 162s 1631 1410 60 51 Fved As,we 11 u u 12 1a 10 12 12 12 12 r 173 r. S2Date P,nco4+ 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 13 Coos Na Income >7 10 10 /o so 13 so 16 so so i • I, d ~ rY f' c 35 u Y r It 'v{p pal x~.L j ,r L.: ~,7d{:^S,YhF1•~.,.1 (:7 x 10 `Y .32x• 0 1 0 f 1 rI~ AOMINISTM1ATIISN AGW9,4ggl Efl,,AI@ FV FY FY FY FY FY n1 99SWWCI . 4C 100 two all I$3I 1396 1996 Im 2000 2001 20C2 2003 2304 i::3 9eivss I sr 4 Wave Ton1,a m $542 W2 5341 t749 5717 1305 t716 a WOMng CAPW T-4ntt4I - 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 3 f Ew,nc Tws'o 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 { i' s Wttp Tgntlsr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 SWt s'"aw Twits, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 P'O",if M4rsa4nNal a 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 f Fall SONK11 trSnst.r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO1rot Gant 9 0 0 9 0 0 9 9 0 1 I Tow P4.1nuw 1.1011 1:4. 5:42 WI Sus t3" 1305 1116 534 %W 10 Ppnl 5223 5214 1214 {219 5226 {211 $240 9241 S23A 5252 I! &Aches E 1 I I 5 10 IO 10 10 .0 ' ti mAeWOM4 2 1s II IS IS 15 13 13 14 '4 10 SONCw 22 122 122 76 37 36 79 3/ 40 Al ' !1 MWan[4 0 1 1 t t t 1 I I f ; 15 Sm4ry 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 16 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r~. r Other 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O IOmu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Md 001 17 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 7 20 P4SoNes - CvI,rgonry 0 0 0 ISO ISO ISO 160 ISO ISO 'SC 1 tt A3'yn raMta eon Gov 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 22 Owr" ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f 93 Tour OPtrSIN Evem"s I250 13" 53" $429 5427 Sus SAM uu SAM 5411 f 24 Inwood IF.701 10 10 SO so so s0 $0 so so 60 25 Wo OsanIp Iweast 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 AMN" • Cwbnwcv 0 0 0 ISO Iw ISO 160 Ise ISO 'SO 27 am so," Ir10,111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Mao Pod CunSM A" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' at coot 0 0 0 0 C 0 O 0 0 0 30 IAnara CKww 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 21 Cob Iwwne4 Exe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 M-scolarooul ESP 0 2L Uhl 0 0 9 9 0 0 9 17 TOW Now9motmq Pevlnuw 1 so ISM 11211 3150 1150 1150 $150 IISO $ISO $'S0 I OOADO06-Itt16d.m 34 u44y Twslo s ON O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 ' 35 011,4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Tow Tr4nba W 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 Sr NN IKoni Sri $152 1152 542 102 w 12 64 14 14 3e f" 0a'1" 4 Cw 4ntnA 5306 9542 1542 5341 131/ On LIM SSt1 3x24 5211 So bg4~M4 An4nM 0 0 0 ISO ISO 150 ISO ISO ISO '50 40 TOW IMON" $1101 $542 $542 5491 $499 5527 Nu syl $474 tw ' 41 TOW Cash Erprn4t 3306 $542 $642 14/1 5499 5321 6455 3406 6414 Sm 49 Fwd Attot I $ 2 2 2 21 ! 4 4 4 43 0401 11 K04I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u po"I sr Co" rectm 23 LW 130 W t9 SS 0 0 0 0 r 0" 'r is cash MM Incem4 to $o to to to 10 SO $o so $a i • • v. , $ tw 17 36 2 }C WO y r r ''x . J souowasre _ ..r. n fv WCI Pecrclmg . Conlraat Volume Al t41 6"b1N [It"e 8,104 rv r fv r0 995WkG • •60000 T~ Colos LW 126 :396 1299 2300 ~1 1002 W =II. 2005 5.1791 Asa P4 Opel nn-PAyinau 1 RH'tlfnl'a1 67646 92661 92 ear 12.714 92 794 W bu 12110 121's 12 177 82 639 Cornmem'81 1792 1011 4440 161 d 771 x.797 4.M 4 W 1174 dais La1v]fi0 a9S sel 107 671 197 Sal SSO $90 117 477 _ 40924'68 Contract 0 Lards 0 0 a 1143 5571 6156 1121 4040 Slat /Ad2 ' 504!06 C9N'da F,V+YVtd Fds 14%1 a 0 0 110 71f 292 246 734 217 756 - 6 PKycIrq 41 82 7S 114 16 203 222 742 2" 747 7 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 Q 0 6 Total OD4,811ng Revenue 1110 111 V p 5a 111005 10973 $9616.1 114 W 114 756 114 bar 119 471 OIAer Revenue i 0 Re6'dent.al 33 21 25 72 74 74 35 SO 07 77 10 COmm4re41 71 0 0 0 a n a a 0 0 11 LanaN 0 a 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 12 Abnuhslratwn Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 17 Total Cgeraling 6 Other Pevemel 6150 1124 S'S37 111034 514 We 1'd 117 514179 114.74 694,701 SIS,S00 ' 14 III 12.167 1224 5724 12171 Us" 67.717 12 SO 12921 13013 61901 I y is &Clots 732 772 M 14s 454 661 474 664 197 Sea 1 16 Maml orAme 764 Pa 710 m 195 r„ 717 767 757 717 77 strY9ee1 191 IN Add 127 Ye WS HI I's 111 W - a Inadlnce t1 J. 31 27 x a I7 9 31 10 Sundry 104 140 141 160 711 Sea 3011 34 107 111 20 T7anslaf 0 0 0 a 0 1 2 7 4 S 21 WCI CaPtal Fes a 0 0 lit 435 • 635 471 2.7 120 ' 20 WCI Processmy Fos 0 0 0 W 1087 1,+01 1.141 1,14 12" 1,291 21 Bad OW IF 40 10 x 82 Is 6 1S 6 S4 22 Reserve • Conl,ngency 0 0 0 950 150 191 ISO ISO 750 ISO 71 Admo1 Transfers Gen Gov 491 569 541 551 56 121 16 67 731 r14 24 Dwoo&w w 111 mQ 102 192 612 1% 121 19 217 i Total Opent'nq Expenses 14,762 55247 51173 tax 1161 17,61 616 6675 66s7 6.rid 20 Operating IMeresl 1112 1171 6220 114 Wild 13W sat 91s7 tits 1274 - 27 Non-0perating Interval 24 6 M It a 11 V 14 96 12 26 R414M1 - Conlingemy 1 50 0 0 160 190 Ise ISO 150 I" ISO 20 DOW Sal IntaPIM 1611 04711 14751 14301 111A 14791 15401 (A rad Idea) 1051 10 Dew 76uamo f"Pse 0 0 0 0 a 0 4 4 9 4 31 01774 Transfer Expense 0 461 d9 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 32 COn1. Motor Poof a X 135 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 - - 33 pew Rellrem"I 0 pal 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 11 LACOM Cloture f PelMoure Lux 122E 0211 1291 0016 2a 1206 Lum 12011 (2061 34 Taal Norkoora nq Revenue (Ex; 11171 .61!1 W11 ,82731 61711 11115) ,82111 1161 15501 1114+) . + op TQsle's n.SOutt h r 35 U115ty ry UInd4H OA 11017 11051 0,161 1491 µ75I 14V1.5031 4111 9111 11491 = . 1i FrancMSe Fat 0611 22D 098 WSL 65511 S2SI 65211 Am 6961 1616 37 Total Trdnafal Out 0171 4971 641 12921 0.0111 11.0821 65.0671 110191 111091 (1 14n f 30 Not IROom4 93 112 loll 11.150 13242 1116 92171 Ss 312 54171 Ad is! 11.47 79 Total OplydLng 6 O+het Ravenut 6Ne 1124 6753) 111071 196 ON H/IH 1969'9 It1.114 111,702 111 We I 1 40 Nonop4'anng Revenue 2046 213 711 369 s9 567 iY Sal 510 Lie 41 Reehes • Cap'la1 Conslnrtl,:n Q Q 0 W so 0 0 90 IQ ID 42 Total Revenut 6.1'1 17171 57.96 11.453 6'4192 911.45 6'1631 $11304 1162tl Me a5 • 9 43 Total Cash Expanse 6.120 11.65 st 417 to NO 110971 110.922 11+071 lit IN 511-171 111,924 44 Rtoomm • Capital CondtnXI-on 0 0 0 $O s0 90 t0 6 9o 90 1 S Fixed Assail tell 322 327 1901 ISO 360 W 212 217 IM a Dew Pnnc"I 530 UI 136 162 4" 114 7225 1141 1239 I,e6 I 1 47 Repay LT Debt EiwIr.c as 190 196 60 0 11 0 0 a 0 41 Repa) LT P-N L" ZS 720 110 IQ 300 ula 42 0 1 1 49Cash Net income 656 11d S76 6316 14 Sea Ad 1t$ 3162 14 lop 6.16 62)0 SO Resarvlf 9600 5411 6MI 12.070 17111 511,664 1'1481 17062 824)4 421.047 q7 + 7 ~ X111 ' 0 RESICEMTUI SOl10 WASTE ! WCI F4q C nnq 4 C[,tta:1 YP~^V l 995 JfWC1 . 1011'30 Tc,4 OV Ac1,31 Ill E+urv-e h' FY FY Fir FY N FY 1292 I39B 137! 1399 2700 2003 UU 2:Ln3 20G1 ULS 1 Tc,al Mnua i C mlx4 n 192120 190'76 196650 642415 2030,S 203 e15 204215 21A VS M e's 006015 ' 20m c+ •,,a ropl 6,s 15190 61063 16063 19384 90725 92766 93667 95104 )6.199 100654 / 3 Avq Cvtx V64, C mr 045 046 046 Du 045 046 046 a47 041 049 ` 4 A1q M9, 1.4! C,%1 1700 1300 1300 1300 1300 1300 1300 1300 ,300 1300 92fil All S Feeoenha Feet all 32.623 $2.646 12.764 32 »1 12 019 $2.167 52.793 52.107 12110 6 Ras sma al Pclvl) 0 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 1 713tiv1!G14u 16 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 flf 5 Sue Swn,A'ge 19 13 12 U 21 U U 2S 29 25 9 Tt11,I Gw'anlq Fn@Nft 2Gas $2664 52617 12,766 12.794 327102 32.610 we's 12127 f26DS GR,n Rwen,.a. IO sale 01 ll Ups 2S 21 21 25 2S 26 27 27 n 29 1 11 A00IA%*% 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 17 Ill x44, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t3 Aecvcw,g so 31 21 17 26 21 26 21 29 29 14 ill , Gqw 0 0 0 D 0 D O 0 O 0 15 Cheat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t1 To-so o l 6 0"r 2.738 12.126 12.741 12176 $2654 U 564 $2.173 $2163 52.190 52.901 li I? Ill 01.01... 120 1197 U 11.106 61 140 37114 51,209 31245 11.217 V Ul j 14 SUP060 115 163 133 193 224 229 233 234 20 244 194aeleanc6 011 IS 95 110 t,2 lu 017 14 121 t24 Pr 20 Sm<a+ 97 105 IDS 179 tea ,117 190 194 191 642 , It Inounxe 4 ! 9 12 12 12 12 13 13 17 22 3,04y t 4 4 a 4 A 4 4 4 4 23 Tlenah, 0 0 a 0 0 1 7 3 4 S 24 01014, 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 2 a 0 2S rib C1DIIM Fla c 0 0 32 69 eo 91 St 25 14 2S WCI F,an leg Fee 0 0 0 38 76 so 93 11 $ 64 11 9a0 Dee 0 Is 3 12 20 21 22 21 21 11 29 A01M 7qn+1e11 Gen Car 239 269 261 264 241 2911 3,6 335 336 376 29 ot11>reeean 8 U U 21 U 21 m U all n 30 Tow ODeaap WeN11 1 424 31.6x1 11677 11274 32.143 32207 62,270 12331 $2,367 $2.653 en .u IEtna.. el 71 K41611l (am) S'4 151 S11 131 110 sn $70 170 371 171 32 N0n-00411109 101,8,4111 12 9 9 S 4 7 1 1 2 0 j 33 gne, Rev 7 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 34 o4Al sense Inll'ov 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3s Mad 152O1 Cv1na Rev 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 AOrrwt F8,," 108001 (101! 11137 07% 115) 111) 1941 (71) (791 (111 1831 I 31 laVil Eoe A (7611 IASS) IAS111 1755) 1736) 11771 (921) (9401 (9711 11 Aril - 38 1lacycarq EeOenAa 4138) 12110) 121) (1q (47) phi 1311 1211 131 10 391una11 Cn+a FYN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 40 TOW herroc4MI.19 AMM,49 1 1,35301 456411 111671 158461 1319x) 11933) (19651 13971) (1941) (11,076) Ow,km 41 Mor 716,1101 664 IX 19) lA) (961 (96) (191 (102) 1105) 11011 (1111 42 fnncM6a FN AU Ah 18D )1111 1121 1211 im 1M M lml U Tow T1+n+lers GA 111SI 19,51 Al Ins) (I r9) 11161 (1 0801 (164) 11821 'I u Net lxeM 1610 12,0 $311 ,1,59) !32641 1S"al ISM 116121 (16271 ISE09) , t 431sa Oil l Gate 114 '.v 2738 52.121 12,747 $2.$e U854 12.814 12873 52.1163 93M2 $2,301 44 5v,,c~j A"" 68 w $ 0 U U U U 27 11 47 ro1,1 PWMVA 2824 12.714 1.138 12191 62627 $2.$f $2.W 52054 92 NO $2173 • at real Cun Er.^a^w+ 2,164 32. S61 32 s,9 $006 53111 $,430 $as1 53.512 93,561 $.764 48 F FAO u581A 17 r2 q f 2 811 3 1 ! 6 1 f 41 Cott FI%VAI 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 SO CV16 MA1 Inmma 660 1217 6311 41451 X12") 114921 113151 ISM) IVAP 4117) St 1114,e AJIU51 enr 6301 000'+ 000% 000% 000% 000`+ 90D% 00015 0004 1 ~ 1 r 1 38 .1~ xN➢ r' 3210 ;Mamma 1 emsum COMMEACIAL SOLID w4ST1 'NCI 14"C' q . Cc•Paa Vply Ac1u41 0,59em f+an4Y FY FY iY F1 FY FY r1 1 99sw&cl . '50:00 to's 0111 194I 2M1 174! 19:9 212 2001 2062 2003 2005 2003 1 7o1a1 Annwr 012+100414 26777 24.404 22647 21523 29063 39 K7 MA3 29.793 ]0027 30M7 1 1 UnN~n Ca01: Ylry4 - 353 162 7's 00o 319 000 271566 933 548 253 212 253.451 249 370 7!0.757 256 N: Il 3 A.q CGADc Yds l Cusl 1235 IS71 1537 151 974 196 a64 124 43S 147 AMq MIN &I $ Cm1 17213 161:7 16467 +6340 1624! '6235 16231 16229 16234 16240 - 1 .$OYOdJ7 5 Ca1ti•rrcul Fa44 N619 !3.427 5312 $4.110 5649 51265 !4.127 $4.r64 $4 We 5$47 6 5pecal 11140"o O 1s II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I e 7 Swe Sumia'04 92 Ia so 11 72 70 s9 a 70 t1 i 1Baa5n: Gnt• 2 0 0 0 4 4 0 9 O 0 9 Tout Opf'AIN ANnnu4 S1783 S404 $4.440 $4641 5.721 $4 757 5, 79S 5.636 14.174 6.115 CIn1, Re.4nu4a 10 AXha'1us 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 O O II Olw 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Prw rear AK"N O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 , q Aw^F11,W 2 7 t 17 141 111 197 213 211 211 14 IgNsm I Gnu 0 4 9 0 0 9 0 9 0 a IS Tcul Ooenunq a 01tnr 17116 14.021 5,122 5.771 $662 $4P72 5.901 is 50 45.090 u. 133 IS A.y:a4 5611 $702 5702 Will 1671 (697 5424 5912 5960 11010 17 Suwve 101 111 tla 121 123 126 IM U+ 134 139 ` II Meow l^:O 3SS 720 720 )5 Al 361 371 763 791 "a E` if SON<*$ 300 291 211 263 263 270 276 MI 211 207 7 20 lr"nixe ll 14 14 14 14 14 19 19 1S 1/ t 21 Sandq I 6 4 1 6 6 1 1 7 7 22 rnnvoo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Otnu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 'r 24 YICI Ga151 Fee 0 0 0 164 369 374 779 343 +92 106 - 29 wci Froutlnq Fes 0 0 0 Id MA 171 2" 303 722 319 - 20134d CAM 0 22 22 11 29 3+ 31 31 30 30 27 Adm1n T,snd4n Gen Goa 191 191 191 190 199 211 224 2'31 751 2% ' 21 DeplKtanon 11 IN M 7.33 311 !6! 360 321 310 1111 29 Tow OP441" EW111e/ (1,640 11.79a 11.741 52.232 12.629 12.711 12013 17,902 52.719 12712 baollos3 3N1410,11 1110 ~Jd1L1EJaa0ilfl Slog $76 1127 11g $+11 Silt 12+20 1121 5127 Un 31 ld ao attllq In14,41t 23 SO 41 2S 20 IT 4 1 U 3 32 Ore, Pev 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 33 000 S4mr4 mtelm 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Wor Pod Curem Aa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Ayres Fundirq 10/0CI 5641 (IM) 1116) 0311 11361 (1471 1119} 1+211 (121) 11311 39 LaMt4 Elwnee (2.3071 12,771) (2.327) 121571 (241521 il."Al (2,3$4) tUllll 11.215) II ski) 37 Aagtl" Elpen4e 0611 (121 (72) (367) (252) 12113 (213) (2091 122) 73 X Landl6 Clown Fund a a 9 a a a a 0 0 0 30 TOW 146ncOOMI" Aaaemues II Sa 11111 132.4031 V 345; 112.5321 112.4011 (126141 152.1021 (11/01) 112220) 137.331) r CaKolloo Tam", ft L" 40 vlpv T•6nslen Out 1225 111 fat Il4al I.tso1 (+541 Vill 1160 (lea! 11771 41 Fnncnls4 P44 1361 5921 um U911 L= a, f41a um ILM I►13 42 Total T:4n fol Dui 06) 1731 (131 124 (2531 (249) 1261) (as? (272) (M •3 Nei IrkOnn 133171 11252) am (1232) 1542+1 116401 156111 (16191 152001 444% I W I" M_" a 1241 Me" 31116 14 wI $4,442 $4 771 64.162 &A t32 SA m 35047 "m U.133 ( T 49 heape'M19 1IMMI 130 Ili 179 110 134 133 124 124 136 124 4 44 Awer11 Ca,u Clna•RM 0 0 0 SO 20 30 20 w Sa SO 0110121 Anenue 11206 64.157 kill 1A I)a 35 osI 55,117 15.163 15221 11275 11. xv 1 48 Two, Caen Eu,ll 1.190 $4,430 54 414 15277 SSS+P $5010 55.161 ISIS) IS .64a 13.761 { ' ) 47 Awewl - Como Co Wr 0 O 0 30 SO so s0 So s0 so 412 fued Asnrs 146 163 103 211 171 244 141 190 112 164 I 40 Coal FINICAP 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 9 s0 Caa6 Net Income 1544) 112011 1109 153151 34661 47131 13103) twl1 (1271) 164541 SI Ara A"I'nenl $04% 000'1 0004: 000% 007. OWN. 000': 000% 007. :Y t _ r r' 1 39 <:;~r~.. ,r 7 5~ 32X 10 • 1 66101 • I LANDFILL A7.a1 Bu00al f4erav fv Fr Fr Fv f1l h FY 99SWWCI . 180000 T,," 0 139. :395 an 1399 2000 2CG1 20C2 M07 MO4 2CC5 . r", 114964111119 IO IF xsaw 176+0 1764) to 003 449 11.134 16467 16929 11409 x9161 " 2 Cor ..,,Cal 10 LF 7C 936 66665 66665 569" 571): 55714 54831 54)36 SIR 56971 r 3Coetran m LF - 2503 2600 3494 6039 1260 1327 116s 9224 9665 10.167 / 4 06moa W LF 0 0 0 16 S50 153900 141700 145600 143,100 14) 100 143100 ( 0656 10 LF 10664 10032 7,034 7.246 7463 7611 7,117 6313 0.129 916! . Oths, 10 LF IV 517 300 X2 3L9 126 3Y 753 317 791 I 7T01al Annual Tons +03%2 0.740 17.354 167542 24551 236952 236.176 234.320 236.954 259 us i eLan0h4 R4wCV 5620 $660 5160 366 1900 1920 $040 3960 5960 61000 Obef-Inn A vit0j 60 j 9 Re54r141 Foos 9366 3451 SASS 1755 1736 5177 $926 6940 6137 61,073 IQ 000un4mal Feu 2307 2727 2327 2.152 2.152 2364 2394 2291 127S 2,600 11 Cwt," Fees 69 I16 So 229 241 254 266 257 MIS 939 12 Outs-00 CM 0 0 0 2747 5361 6079 6.139 $361 Sam 630 U Cash F4ee 297 347 1" 213 224 am 249 267 206 307 1401Mr Fees t0 24 0 10 tl 12 12 13 14 is Is Miscelunaooa a a 0 0 0 0 o a a o 167014100471x0 Perenues 63060 93 272 $3071 66,106 mISO 31112 s0.01 III VA II. S4 613669 Calm An16d,tl 17 A4 In Con9t"IW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 sole sm rm-go 11 14 14 lie 212 2% 206 201 202 201 t0 RWVCmrq COMMA 111 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 200use4 C. wt~ em4«.N1 0 9 0 LU 213 257 230 231 221 am at Totes O04n1n0 A plnr U071 0266 93092 56331 10171 310262 110440 110096 so 033 111,147 i 22 Flings 5295 11fA am 1350 93 '0 9311 9392 !404 1416 6429 'Y ! 23 SAO" SI 6 63 02 93 IS 91 99 101 103 24 M4ntra+ca 216 211 211 233 203 201 211 215 all 224 as SaNK" 210 729 329 44 261 266 261 254 ass 263 ll 26 IpiI ) 3 3 7 1 / 7 7 7 1 f 27 so" as 130 130 ISO )07 2" 295 m 2% 300 21 Otnr 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 WCl C4D4ar Fall 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 WCI Pro,:osi Fee 0 3 0 1% 727 11) 77S 102 134 639 31 µ46 0461 0 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 U Adrrvn Tnnslan 00 Om 4a 67 67 67 70 74 79 64 69 94 6 Deora0a11a1 L19 U 51 133 275 39 424 416 100 Sm 34 Total Ocamwv Esprses 61071 61.162 61.179 11,656 62275 S2)6p $2544 12.19 at 720 12.762 a10pm;01p0.A an." F.rvr.aa krona (630) 111 110 613 so III 613 614 Vs 111 617 1N0e4pal lnana VI t0 21 32 V 35 It t0 31 9 37 0", 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 DON Sroce Inbreel tsall (4754 (41SI (430) (4571 (U!) Isom (472) (402! (469) 39 Mohr ►00I Cunam R4s 0 (3) 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 AAnn Fur" (01001 11361 (216) 142) Dam 1124) (134) 110" 111) 1$14) ills) 41 Nt9t46rpus 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 42 Dow RF6nr. l 0 7151 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Closun I P0aI010wn 11391 12201 13111 2m 12001 12061 12mi 12111 1X1.1 I= 44 TOW Nonop4n6np (Pe.MUso rsi t11401 119501 117111 (17401 937661 (1630 (6711 16131 11771) $1~9a9111fU11d1DW 1 AS thisy Tnnaun 0.e (461 190) 101 (2201 1226) 12331 12401 (24F) 12541 12621 r as FWcnua FN AA U3L 15711 1451 mm L40L 16061 {7961 m 11161 r 47 Tow T•arllen Dot 11931 12211 (223) (a661 1565) 1634) ill"I (641) 16421 (6971 4 as Nei 919,174 It 22S 6962 6740 13 am $9510 Stan U417 le cm !5.117 16197 I 4917x, C>o94W 1 Dew ebYy4 13 071 53296 93092 56771 19 x71 11002 6+0,"a 110096 61 O3) 111,147 S li . 50 y "ors ii 222 21 as 40 as 0 a9 24 S2 a It ?Dial PStru4 "297 ".3t4 93,13$ 66772 $1221 (10330 610..,: 110,120 (1916 (11,172 I I 52 Tout Curl E4paoses 12401 1:1211 &1229 93.647 N 271 14.14 KW 64.07 14.101 65.621 6 F.11 Alsols 3 102 102 1la 67 27 42 at 64 SI { S4 0401 Pnrrcoal 330 939 930 ill 1193 t, lea / 225 1,241 1750 1,601 IS Raptn,ent F'7cmc !Lad) 25 ISO ISO 60 100 too 41 0 0 Q S6 Cash Not 111,1400M Ia11 6132 40 12223 IOU LUA 65.522 13111 LLCM L53s) ,i 31 Pale AAustmenl 4 K.. 8)0% 130% 2 204 120'1 6.la% 110% 100% L6n17..9a1n.LJ20 V306 o 1-. • 1 1111ee4rhal sit 00 "194 $41 14071 1111 11s021 14164 $020 a Canr'lanal 11700 11106 1' 71 11120 1271 Sal 1? 1211 1411 6466 3 cwwl 126)4 12647 62672 "040 93101 Sit 75 93412 133 to 63316 k 4 OutsE4 Coy 12634 110 u 12000 120 41 an 11 Ul 3? 11112 in 21 122 n I C ICash I Oita) 12967 122" IV so S3129 "tM 332" 93037 63107 U4 1s 0a4, 'ef Cools. woo 630 11 046 14 lists 13614 937 $s 116 u 6M 14 1715 M . r 40 ` t ~y„ 111 4stiMh~r x 10 32x ❑ . a . ~e.'.eJ 1. ^.42e J'9' .:L3 :c: 'S5 I.ac .IJ e1.: ar 7:d :1318 E 15366 156.7 'glee 21,133 775:6 24766 24128 I 4 RECYCLING htWl Bvagel Fnm41e FY FY FY FY FY FY FY 99 snAw:1 180700 Ton C 3942 1990 1950 1399 2^~ 20111 2aC2 20101 2^.66 2'~' I TV, Yob Wavot I, 195 7042 6972 7.153 7.321 law 7676 19'6 62r'. 1 I 2 t;n6 Na*wwer 1.736 122S 2619 12431 12766 1548S 11 IM 16967 19 S76 27:95 3 Tone temoc411 1.070 0 400 1.741 1193 2.174 2401 2.VA 2.743 2621 i ` 4lr as ^te,conyipl Paper 31 7 7 30 31 m 42 47 44 41 ' S Ton Glass) 00o, 233 264 225 179 1,008 1.223 1,351 1400 1,143 1 511 6 Ton Alwn Sled I re, 110 1a6 93 219 220 2T! 224 32I 32 146 7 P" *d Tmru0e 103,17 1652 10502 21 US 23.141 25 ISM 28 us 21.$04 32,501 33520 A,igr Rev s%,r Ton 51917 11319 57.40 11060 Ito Sr 11045 11021 11010 9993 Salalln I 1 OM41 Pewr so u S2 9o so b to so b so 10 Cvftald 20 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 - 11 4,p4p4K11 2 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 12 M"04 0 1 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Omv 06 Stu 39 30 72 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 - 14 YY6 Wade Pm llwo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Ael4ental 0!1," Rr.lnue D 0 0 17 26 20 26 23 29 22 16 Commemal 1`10" Revenue 0 0 0 47 141 173 113 213 lit 211 I? Contract pm" Amm.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r81114~tal Fvnbn/ 138 250 216 61 41 36 31 21 3 (101 i - I9 Commert4 Ito" 110 U u 352 252 219 211 20 111 ax 11 ' M Taw Aeaycprq Rel elhll 5367 5368 5367 IS31 $467 1457 $466 $471 4:70 5165 J 21 P47m1 1749 1172 1'12 5149 170 III NS 671 111 162 22 54O142 27 19 19 11 6 6 1 6 1 8 23 4anr"No 77 63 63 U 7 7 7 1 1 1 24 Sencu 67 38 36 N 4) 4 AS b 47 48 29 klw/nce 1 2 7 3 2 2 2 2 1 7 29 send 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 O6ar- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ill 210Mar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to WC, C*Dw Fee 0 0 0 217 435 435 an 435 211 129 300010 Deb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 310" 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 3I kstto1 twills Gee Gov 30 34 34 33 33 17 39 42 44 e7 33 000u sw 0 2D m a 33 32 62 U 4S 6S { 34 tour OOe,iitmO E.W idis 5346 93017 93M $554 5631 1640 6630 $650 5446 1356 _ r~1000 Pr.en..u IF eereul ' 35 Inum1 (1301 12 b P 12 $179 1156 1154 1151 1141 9164 X Nw4Dwslrq Nle,00 0 1 13 7 S 4 1 1 3 1 37 00dr It& 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 390M Sense Inured 0 D D O 0 0 D 0 4 0 ' 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 39 G4, 121 r b Abnn Rlwly 10800) 13) 141 (51 12) (2) IA (7) 121 It) 410cw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 42011,4 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 o D 43 Otr e 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 - j u Tow Nowetimq A MM,," 119 SS 59 17 SIU h51 1117 PSO 6W 6162 001r4Sr4"1ncFfrtSL10 f 45 I/ows, Nvem 0v1 III (01 101 111 12) 111 (2) 121 (2) 131 b Omer 9 D 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 1 IR' ` 41 tow Tgre(4a Om (q 101 10) 121 12) (21 (2) 121 121 (31 t { • if 0111 Ircem4 419 624 111 till) (1231 427) (1301 15331 (5321 ;5331 I s 411x, 0o4.,4r,4 1 r " e4.1" 4.)61 1366 1363 1332 Syt fast 5466 1479 5270 Iris Y aaae wj 44w~.a1 2 I 16 1 145 101 140 151 150 IN 49 Txe1 AOerve 1361 4715 9316 141 6612 U17 5625 1431 6411 m SD T,'A! C4d• EIC411e1 5369 137E 5116 tS41 1612 14t7 9371 1671 1411 1329 It $1 F.uO tit+v4 t9 44 44 12 10 10 12 12 12 is 12 ow p"cel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 b b b t 47 cash 0111 sr"ml b so b b b b so ~ `F I r f I 41 rr % . ❑ 75 ~ 10 32'x e I 0 f I C J I ADMINISTRATION 41641 &Ogel Eshrvl4 FY rY r! FY !Y h FY , i . WSWWC1 . 160 700 Tans 0,1 :942 t396 1346 LM 2910 2x1 227& 23 203 2X6 1 9aA0ys2 1 SOW NtYY Tgry!p 6)06 $542 $542 $341 5341 1377 MS 3316 57.1 5717 , 2 Wo& g CAD.W Tlands, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 'S E4oln1: Tnn44r 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 4 won, Tnntly 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 3 'W' IaYAnr T+an 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 O 'e IS Pro04rq M4nsg4m.o1 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 14N SYV¢n Tnrs4r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i. 4014,1 Gon1 9 Q 0 9 0 0 0 9 9 0 ' 1 Tons PwanYn 1106 15542 $542 Lul 13" $37? sxs $316 SU& $ilt OCl3Y4 .n~nae I 10 PYpol 5223 1216 5211 6212 $229 9233 1240 9241 9294 Ww , . N sw0an 1 f 1 f 9 to ID ,D +D ,o 12 va"11 rc4 2 19 19 12 13 13 13 13 14 14 13 54n¢4s 22 122 122 31 37 31 N 30 40 41 14 In4arV1ce 0 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 16 Su1yry 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 16 Omar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1';L. ' V Olga 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 12 Olrnr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 bad 0401 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 20 PauYft• Cwl,,gency 0 D 0 ISO ISO ISO ISO ISO ISO 190 21 Admen N"I"s Gen ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Ctw'aSw 7 9 0 0 P 0 9 0 0 P 23 Total Owit" fcrm 1260 m 13" 421 W1 145 lass 6462 410 476 NM1004HLM P... nu~f~ It'y~nu~I 241W111041111 16301 so so to so f0 $0 so 10 f0 4 25NOnr D•nt:rg Irwom 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Rn4h41 • canlup4nry 0 0 0 ISO $50 ISO 150 ISO 150 ISO 17 DIN 54ve4 10,111051 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 M" Pod C6pm4m A" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 CAI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3011rW,d E4Wnn D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 31 044 41wrct Ew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 32 Mat4nan s E.o 0 ILI 1261 9 9 9 9 9 Q 0 I~ 33 Total No emhrp A"An n ( so (3261 11211 11550 1150 6156 1150 $ISO VSO 1150 Qp4ypp Trandan 10.41 i 4 UMiry 7764103 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3S Other 9 Q P 9 Q 0 0 0 0 0 31 TOW Tnnlem Out 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 W1 rleenl4 126 5192 1192 W 667 162 k 4 k 4 + 5 r r ' + 31 tar OwtNs 6 OM Re," 6306 $542. 1542 1311 $319 13" 6305 6314 1324 6333 31 e4•eo4'a0 fte, w 0 0 0 410 ISO ISO 190 ISO ISO 190 1. 40 TOLM AIIII l 6306 $542 6512 411 406 6527 W11 466 444 463 ` . 41 TOW CAM EIIWntn 1306 $542 6512 411 409 6527 lass SAW 414 413 4 li 42 Pied A Ws 1 2 2 2 2 27 2 1 4 4 4 040 Pm M"' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 RANT LT 040 E4aK as 359 160 m m 15 9 0 9 0 E II 45 Da1N WI kv 110,4 1o so W 1o 4 b 4 10 10 16 r , I 1~ 4 1 1 i 1 I x. n e. fi`J I I I C i {ri ` , I 42 ; 32x. I r' ~ t 1F A 1 s 1 ,.,aiaar~ c j t .A 1 A I j DRAFT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MINUTES JUNE 1. 1998 AGENDA 11 L%I9 CONTINUE REVIEW AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE FISCAL _.p 1 EAR 1999 SOLID WASTE BUDGET + EarlCrasss. Dlrcctcrol'Financial Administratile Scnices and Charles S, Watkins, Director of Solid Waste resiessed the Fiscal Year 1999 Solid Waste•operaiing budget. The badger presentation included options for ) a Matcrials Recowe Facd iN t%IRFi, residential awomated route (with and equipment rental option), roll of route. aliernatise dail} cos er program and an attcr hours drop-orf site The Public Un[Hlcs Board noted unanlmou5h to approse the fY 1999 Solid Waste budget after a motion b) Board Member Dick Nonan and second b% Hoard Member Bili Giese >r rPf. I. Y .1 t I i to I/ f t 1 'I r I ~ r I i a A ~ 1 t A s ) r ) 4, d v r. { jL I F. 43 X 10 ' uri' ~S. r. I,V ~4" 1 . 0 1 I Apenda No__Lu wQ Agenda Item AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET Dale f AGENDA DATE: June 9, 1998 " DEPARTMENT: Human Resources ACM: Mike Jez SUBJECT: VI Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding an update of the City of Denton Workforce Diversity Plan (FY 1997/96 to 2001102), r SACK ROUND: The City progressed from Affirmative Action to Workforce Diversity (WFD) in 1992. At this time the City's focus and philosophy progressed from a "federally-mandated" mission to a sincere commitment to develop an accessible and inclusive work environment. The City's mission became to create a diversified workforce that reflected the demographics of the community. Two (2) year WFD plans were developed and implemented for 1992.94 and 1994.96, In 1996, the curry, it 1VFD plan was developed with the assistance of Dr. Richard Lewis, diversity consultant. The attached WFD plan is a five (S) year plan of action that extends in the year 2002. This plan incorporates he go?Is and strategies recommended by the diversity consultant, Workforce Diversity Committee and Diversity Management Panel. Additionally, the organization's plan includes WFD plans devised by the respective city departments. PRIOR ACTION1Rh'VIENV (Council. Boards, Commissloos] , The City's Management Team, Workforce Diversity Committee, and Diversity Management Panel have reviewed this document. The WFD plan reflects their recommendations and r input where applicable. O FISCAL INFQRMATION S 1 Fiscal impact will be the responsibility of individual departments as each implements the specific goals for their areas. Any recommendations having organizational impact and requiring additional furding will be presented for Council approval during the budget process. , j 1 Wod force Dlvereiy CC Agenda June 1991 doe ` 1 © i n M • n!.... a/':'nPaw4~'er •x..r~r.luu .n.r.'MM1Hrr.xrMrrr...nswr n:u nrn..~. u.. ~ i Respectfully submitted: Mike Jei, Assist t City Manager of Operations PreparM by: Paulette Ovens-Holmes Director of Human Resources i Enclosures: 1. Workforce Diversity Plan Update Presentation Outline 2, Workforce Diversity Plan Update J d ~ I N v~ FI~..~IA , I 1 J rrl r4~ r r r'. Sr 2 ' V Warkfoaae D vereity CC AWds June IM doe i " ' "7, 32X 4 A Q I I 1 Workforce Diversity Plan Update Presentation Outline • The City's mission Is to create a diversified workforce that mirrors the demographics of tho community at all levels of the organization. Our vision is to devls9 hUlistic strategies that would enable the organization to recruit and retain qualified Individuals within each department and job family as well as employee-related activities, committees and task forces. • Based on the guidance of Diversity Consultant Dr. t-ewla, The City's management team, Workforce Diversity Committee and Diversity Management Panel have provided their thoughts and Ideas over the past year on ways to effectively achieve 4 diversity within our organization The Workforce Diversity Plan reflects their Input, directiot and strategic plans where applicable. The plan likewise includes the following recommendations! 1. Develop departmental strategic plans that would Identify one to three major Issues, and include targeted goals, objectives, and timelines for each. Track departmental progress and provide a written update annually to the City Manager. 2. Consider each employment vacancy as an opportunity to create a diversified workforce where applicable. Devise a tracking system to evaluate departmental opportunities and level of success to hire qualified minorities, women and protected class Individuals. 3. increase the intern salaries to be competitive with the market so that departments are ablo to attract and retain qualified Individuals, 4. Consider utilizing the newly formed developmental tracking option for employees demonstrating potential for upward mobility In each depalment. 5. Create two-three mobility positions to be rotated from the City Manager's office with the caveat that staff is able to find funding within tie resources available. • 6. Continue City participation In the Texas Education and training Co-op's Summer Youth Training program. 7. Continue annual recruitment efforts as well as Include an increase In recruitment activities with local universities and technical colleges. • , O • 3 i 10 3zx10 M1 O 1 ' 1 ••r♦ rn- r..r ..r,nM1M1 M r1nTnT rvM1.r a ..r... . nnV. •V..V LVUi.MMn-Jn•rrna♦ ~ iN.nn Y. Workforce Diversity Plan Update Presentation Outline 8. Disband and then replace the current Workforce Diversity Committee (WFD) members with managers who will advocate and ensure effective diversity efforts. 9. Update the City Council on an annual basis regarding the accomplishments as well as the status of departmental and organizational diversity issues, goals and objectives, 10. As a pilot program, conduct one off site test for the Flre Department for fiscal year 1M_99. 11,Continue to employ aggressive strategies toward building a market-driven compensation plan, a3 l M I Y~ L L l \K*r Li i 1 i i) k. 32 x 0 acme I i City of Denton Ik j 1 I Workforce Diversity Plan I Update - Presented to I Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Managers Directors { Prepared by • Human Resources o • May, 1998 l y r~~.. S.X10 32XI❑ M3 U 0 1 1 1 11 1 j I Workforce Diversity Plan Update Table of Contents Page ! 1. From Affirmative Action .......rr............rr rrr............rrr.........rr.........r,r.•...4 11r Affirmative Action Plan Updates•••.• ....rrr.rr......rr..r •rr.•.rr.4 Ill. Affirmative Acdon Advisory Committee .rr..rr.....r•rrrr......r•..rr 4 i' IV. To Workforce Diversity .rr........ 3 ~r V. Workforce Diversity Plan Updates....rrr..r,..r..rrrrrrrr..rrr....rrrr.....rrr....r,rr....... 3 Vt. Workforce Diversity Committee,....rrrrrr•.rr..rr.•rrr.rr.•.r.•.rrrrrr......rrrr..rr.rr....rr 3 Vt1. Workforce DiverrityPlan (1997-9g to 2001-02) 6 Vlll. Workforce Diversity Plan Recommendations •r.•.rrrrrrrrrr.rrrrr.rr,...........rr... 7 A. EEO Policy #100.01 .............•rrrr...rr•... rrr•r..rrr...•.rr..........rrrr..r„r,... A2 B. Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan ,r.•.....•..,r.r•..•••.....•r•r..rr.rr••r•02 C. City/Community Demographics Analysis 1• Workforce Analysis (Race)rrr,..•....r..r.rrr....r ................rrr..rr.....rr.C2 2, Workforce ArWysis(OenderlAge).r,r....,rrr ................rr,.................C3 • IX. Diversity Management Panel r•••..•..rr...•.r..r..,.rrrrr.rr•r...r,r.•rrrr.......r.•r.•...r•.. 9 I X. Diversity Management Panel Research and Findings 9 XI. Diversity Management Panel Recommendations It X11. Workforce Analysis l A. City Council, ................•........rr...r rrrrrrr•.rrrr.rr......rr.....rr ..rr 14 B. City Manager's Office 16 S. C. City Attorney.,,......„ rr ...............•.,•r ......•.rr•rrr....r •..•.....22 ...,,...r..rrrr.r.r .......r..rr.....r.........rr....r.r.........r......rrr ~ D. Municipal Judge 27 ' 1 2 7 K 32 X 1 II' MERL Q 1 1 i Workforce Diversity Plan Update Table of Contents (Continued) , Page E Deputy City Manager ...............................................................29 • Engineering & Transportation 30 t • Facilities Management 34 • Planning & Development . 38 F. AsslstantCity Marsager • Finance, ..............43 ✓ • Finance ...................44 • Finance Management & Budget .....................................................45 • Fiscal Operations............................... .......................................46 Information Services ..................................................................41 • Library Services . ........48 • Economic Development . ,,.....,49 • Finance Plans ...........................................................................SO • Business Enterprise Plan ..............................................................54 0. Assistant City Manager - Operations 37 • Fire ......................................................................................SS • 1-luman Resources ........60 • Parks& Recreation ............64 a Police . ...68 H. Assistani City Manager • Utilities „ 73 • Utilities . .......74 a Water Utilities . ........................73 • Sol Id Waste „ 76 • Electric Utilities..... 83 ? r . Xlil, Appendix , • Workforce Analysis by Job Family 67 a Workforce Analysis by Department/Job Family 90 I ti l 5 f~ 32x0'. 1 . 1 0 U I Workforce Diversity Plan Update 1. From Affirsradve Action.., The City's Affirmative Action Program dates back to the early 1980's. The City has maintained a policy of equal employment opportunity (EEO1 and non•d'scrimination in employment. While policy established the framework In which the City operated, the end result was actually determined by daily practices and systematic compliance with the policy. As a result, the City's Affirmative Action Plan was developed and organized as follows: • Introduction including legal basis for EEO and the City's EEO policy statement, Policy 0100.01 (Attachment A) • Workforce and county statistics • Goals, timetables and strategies for the organization as well as departments • Affirmative Action respoasib9itles v A malntenancelupdates ` a "Let's Talk It Over" Process • employee counseling and assurance of non- retaliation 9 An appendix including EEO/EmploymenVFIretPolice brochures, employment process flow chart and an affirmative action malting list 11. Affirmative Action Plan Updates The Affirmative Action Program plans were updated every two (2) years until fiscal year 1996.97, The current plan is a five-year plan (Attachment B). III. Afflrniative Action Advisory Committee i The Affirmative Action (AA) Advisory Committee was implemented in 1983 and met annually to provide Input on changes and/or revisions needed to the Affirmative Action Plan. In 1981, the committee moved from annual meetings to quarterly meetings continuing to provide input on changes as well as assist In evaluatinglupdating the plan. The AA committee was initially comprised of twelve (12) managers and supervisors. O The Committee was facilitated by the Employee Relations Specialist and supervised by ~v the Director of Personnel/Employee Relations, Employer sub-groups were developed as needed on specific issues. i • 32XID A Memo Worktoree Diversity Plan Update May, 1998 IV. To Workforce Diversity The City progressed from Affirmative Action to Workforce Diversity (WFD) in 1992. At this time the City's focus and philosophy also progressed from a "federally- mandated" mission to a sincere commitment to develop an accessible and inclusive work environment. The City's mission was to create a diversified workforce that reflected the demographics of the community. Critical elements in the WFD plms Included: • Recruitment efforts to increase qualified protected cltas applicants e Data analysis of applicant tracking information, workforce statistics, etc. • Employee development efforts • Employee communlcatiordeducation • External eommunicatioNcommunity involvement V. Workforce Diversity Plan Updates Two (2) year WFD plans were developed and implemented for 1992-94 and 199496. In 1996, the current plan was developed with the assistance of Dr. Richard Lewis, diversity consultant. The current Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan (Attachment B) Is a five (S) year plan that extends to year 2002. VI. Workforce Diversity Committee The Affirmative Action Advisory Committee officially became the Workforce Diversity Committee in 1991. The WFD committee Is comprised of twelve (12) diverse employees from throughout the organization plus a representative from the Human Resources Depprtment. The committee meets on it monthly kiwis and currently reports to the City Manager. Outlined below is the WFD committee's vision, mission and role; 4 The committee's vfffon: "To enhance awareness of group differences within the organization with an emphasis on appreciation and value. As a result, to create an atmosphere in which employees are able to • succeed without influence from group membership." 0 , i I 32XIO l • u VA Workforce Diversity Plan Update blay, 1998 ne committee's mission: "The committee, in partnership with the City Manager and acting in an expert role, will develop selected goals and assess progress toward the achievement of workforce diversity." ✓nre committee's role(s): • Assess the organization's progresilt .adards • Experts In the field of diversity • Develop and update planslstandwis • Champions/Ambassadors of diversity • Bridge builders in the organization and the community VII. Workforce Diversity Plan (1997-98 to 2001-02) The current WFD Plan is comprised of two major components. These include: A. Component Nl, Workforce Diversity Cornti ttee Plan The Workforce Diversity committee with assistance from Dr. Richard Lewis, diversity consultant, developed four (4) major issues with a goal and strategies for each issue. The four major issues include, • Expand communication of diversity Issues. • Increase individual professional growth and opportunity. • Positively Impact the community's perception of the City of Denton as an inclusive and accessible employer and service provider. • Increase WFD members' ability to be expert advisors and educators in the area of workforce diversity. B. Com,)onenl N2; Departmental/ Divisional Plans Ancther component of the WFD plan Is the inclusion of departmental issues, goals . and strategies. Each Executive will be responsible for developing three (3) major issuer with a goal and strategies for each issue. Two issues have been identified b/ the Ctty Council and City Manager; j 1, Devise and employ aggressive strategies that would maintain and create where necessary diversity within employee-related activities, task forces and committees. r ~ V • li 32.x 113 a,. s' r n 1 x b t t. A4 nwv~s 0 { i , 1 a 1 ••rnxM. ?,.nrY Sw t.. 4 an ~'~n wnwwsiaYn~ { f , I Workforce Diversity Plan Update May, 1998 , 2. Devise and employ aggressive strategies to maintain and create where necessary a diversified workforce that reflects the demographics of qualified members of nur community within each department or division while maintaining a race and ' Sender ~ieutral hiring, selection and promotion process. (See Attachment C for city/community demographics analyses and Attachment D for workforce analysis.) Every effort should be made by all executives, managers, employees and representatives of the City to include persons var. ing in race, color, ethnic origin, gender, age, socio-economic background as well as lifestyle and disability/ability status in all City activities, functions, talk forces and committees, (Please see ' Attachment C for city/community demographics analysis and Attachment D for f workforce analysis.) Ir A Vill, Workforce Diversity Plan Recommendations , . In October 1997, the Workforce Diversity Committee provided the following recommendations to Executives: i A. Complete the development of the current WorVorce Diversity Strategic Plan and ' present to the City Council by June of 1998. B. Continue to Include diversity progress goals In the performance .valuations of managers, supervisors and executives with the caveat that the goals are realistically assessed and progress of such goats show tangible re. 4ts. 'i . C. Provide ongoing assistance from the Ilum an Resources Department to help Etecutives with training and developmunt of Issues, goals and strategies where needed. D. Analyze and provide a status update of the WFD Strategic Pan annually to the City Council, Continue formal updates every five (S) years far Council approval. 1 r' 1 { L t I Ir T 4 ` Na e~!I. I f t i 7 I, - - - 25 K I C1 32x l tits K 16 i I e 4 i ' . ..wnf~'.et ry.~nw www+~~~MTeR1N'..hRn IM ~ NIM1~.~ ' I I 1 1 • 1 f j ATTACHMENT As EEO Policy 0, r 0100.01 ~ 0 0 '~aP e . 1 f I' Q 32x'0 • F 'G J4 ~ t 4r-' t ~1 ' ' s o ' , a I IOF J PAGE CITY OF DENTON POLICYlAD11INISTRATIVE PROCEDURE/ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE SECTION: HUMAN RESOURCES REFERENCENUMBER 100 01 SUBJECT: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY INITLALEFFECTIVEDATE: , 07-04.92 TITLE: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY LAST REVISION DATE t POLICY STATEMENT, It is the policy of the City of Denton to afford equal opportunity in employment to all individuals regardless of race, color, religion, gender, age, disability status, national origin, or other protected A, classification, Therefore, the City is committed to the following principles of Equal Employment 1 Opportunity law which are designed to achieve a diversified work force: , O 1. To recruit, hire and promote all job clasiifications without regard to race, color, religion, gender, age, disability status, national origin or other protected classification, 2, To base decisions of employment so as to further the principles of equal employment opportunity and work force diversity. 3, To ensure that in-house advancement decisions are made in accordance with the principles of equal employment opportunity by imposing only valid requirements for in-house advancement opportunities. 4, To ensure that all personnel actions, Including but not limited to compensation, benefits, transfers, layoffs, return from layoff, training, education through tuition reimbursement, will be administered v ithout regard to race, color, religion, gender, age, disability status, national origin, or other protected classification. S, To ensure that all facaitiesot the City of Denton are available to employees on a non- discriminatory basis; and that all social and recreation programs sponsored for employees be . open to participation without regard to race, color, religion, gender, age, disability status, national origin, or other protected classification, Y JV FAR ' POLICY, 100 M r A2 i 10 32XIO I 7_1 1 i r l r r rf ATTACHMENT B: Workforce Diversity Committee • Strategic Plan 0 • t 4 YI' I= 1„w Ar r % ti CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan i 1997-98 to 2001-02 IYFD CommLYee 1. ISSUE.. L.xpand communication of Jivr:'v is<ucs, internally and externally. IL GOALto improve communicatiot. and change the perception that diversity is it Human Resource function, MILLS IONLS BY FISCAL YLAR STRAILGILS 91.98 98.99 99-00 00-01 01-02 6 I. Conduct empluyeediversity forums. Conduct 8i-annually Lii-annually Annually Annually First Meeting 2 Publish committee goals'objccui es Complete Annually Annually Annually Annually in the city neusletier. Lipun Plan Completion 1 J. publish cornmimcrupdates Complete Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain I( • in the city ncusletter. As Needed 4. Pro%iJc WFL) committee reports Complete Annually Annually Annu.ill n u11y and ulsl tlev to City Manager through Annually divcrsily status furuw S. Post and update diversily-related Complete Sustain Sustain Sustain Su'lain ; • information on the City's ucbsite. As Needed • 6. Create a W'Fly Committee logo, Complete By 09'98 tta efdptm doc ;+tiC.1 32x~~ 1 0 f i C•IT1' OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997.98 to 2001-02 j WFD Committee 1. ISSUE: Increase employee professional Stu%th and development to prepare them tor promotional optxrrtunities. II. GOAL: Io encourage more CKren5lve use of development tracking'tuition reimbursement programs MILESTONES BY FISCAL YEAR SIRAIEGIES 97.98 98.99 99.00 00.01 01`02 1. WFD -embers present informutiun Complete Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain at depali.,lent meclings. As Needed 2 WfD members prevent updates Complete Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain at ncsv employee uriauatiun sessions. Apt Needed M ' J WFi) members spotlight success unries Complete Sustain Sustain Sustaiq Sustain of development track ing'tuil ion As Avadabla reimbursement, via newsicucr and Oyen, 4 u'I'D members develop survey items for Dcvetup Administer Lvalvate & Administer Lvaluate& development irackingluitien By 09x98 Survey Update Survey Survey Update Survey reimbursement programs j " W wlJplan ~r.K ~ • 1 1 r,,. ?SK~~ 32X • VAN" 0 Mom* CIT%' OF DENTON Workforce Dhersily Strategic Plan J 1997.98 to 20,1-02 1 if'FD Committer L ISSUE: Positively impact the community's perception of the City of Denton as an inclusive and accessible employer and service prusider. II. COAL: to act as a catalyst for positivechange (internally and evlemally). MILESTONE'S BY FISCAL YEAR 5 (KAILGIE,S 9798 98.99 99-00 00-01 01-02 I 0.'I'Uc0mmi0eesurveysHOrAforce Create Administer Evaluare~ Administer Evaluatek on dh -sity issues Instrument Survey Update Survey Survey Update Survey u'} D members create C 0 D F S. C'omplcre Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain presentation. Presentation J. Provide anop(wnunityfor community !lost 110SI Elost 11051 110SI Icadento attend NCbl l'rain -the- Iraincr Iraining Training Irdining Sraining !ruining Instinrte and di%er5ily eor"hops. • 4 %'M cummittee produces insert Complete Update Update Update Update forcurrentw:ruitingbrochure ByU9'99 spot l lght r tg : om rn it Ice and the City's divcaity goals'progress. 3. Encourage depanmcni participation Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain • in specific recruiting events. Send Available protected classempluyces whenever Wot p,ssible. .tart~~aK J ~5 3 2x~~ y r AMM CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997.98 to 2001-02 I H'FD Commiflee i I, ISSUL: Increase WIFE) members' ability to be advisors and educators in the area of eorkforce diversity. 1T. ooAL! To develop professional and leadership skills and opportunities fur Committee members. MILESTUNES BY FISCAL YEAR SIRATEGIES 97.98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01.02 I I. W'FD members attend citizen fire Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain and police academies. Availabte 2 'A 11) members attend NCBI Train- Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustuin Sustain the-'Frainers.minars. Available 3 WF0 members participate in mentor Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain programs. Available 4. 'Alf 0 members participate in Covey Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Leadership Seminar. Available 5. WF0 members participate in C.0D E S. Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain sessions and review taped videos. Available LLA 0IJpLn J(w 4 I❑ tL't 'l. ~i x ~ C~ 32 x Q I I j t I i ATTACHMENT C. City/Community Demographics Analysis j - .i ?~h❑ 32 r f y F Workforce Analysis City of Denton vs. Civiiian Labor Force By Race I City of Denton• CiviUan Labor Fo"e'• white Whim e« Black 6f oil oil block 1.6% Odwr ; Otter MNakks MinwWea !.9% Hkpaak Hiapank 6A% { 1 i L • J ayffayrr data w I R ty, 1998, Data does not inrhdt sprclal 08reemerf; ItWOOM , andw hromery empkyers. • • 1990 COW • fmplayrd and Untmphytd, Dw available /w rrtoloymm PrgMed ro My 1998. Soarer: fats Emp/aymrrr CMWIska nn I F} f ~ - - i.' 25)(10 32X 1'u , e ; , ~ o ' City of Denton Workforce Analysis ' Division By Race a ! i Exeeudve," 4WO'4 tfivielon B" /Dint/ Am11': t Wblte."' xo City Manager City Manager's Office 0 0 0 100%) 9(90%) 10 Division Total 0 0 '.1(109fo) 9 (9096) Leg t. 9, 0 O 8City Anornty 0 111196) r: N w Municipal Judge Judge'sOPfke 0 0 1,~ !0' O';are 10046),~eZ Deputy Engineering & City Manager Transportation 5(10%) 0 0 14(29%) 29 (6l 48 Facilities Managernent 0 0 0 1 (9%) 10(91%) it Planning R Development 3 (8%) 0 0 2(6%) 31(86%) 36 Division Total a# It (896) 0 O 11 p8~~. it } f (.i EVhVer data as of May, Off Nia *wy nrx Include special agreenwns, Beau mt, and/or iennprreary emplay'ery. . ~r,"5 x 0 32 x I I p aae~na O City of Denton Workforce Analysis Division By Race Executive Buck Asian Am.L Hispanic White..' TOW Assistant City Finance 0 0 0 2(19%) 9(82%) 11 Manager -Finance Management & Budget 1 (5%) 1 (5%) 0 0 18(90%) 20 Fiscal Operations 5(14%) 0 0 5(14%) 26(72%) 36 Information Se -vices 1(6%) 0 0 1(6%) 16(88%) 18 Library Services 1(8%) 0 0 1(3%) 36(89%) 40 Economic Development 1(9%) 0 0 0 10(91%) 11 Division Total 11(8%) 1(1%) 0 9 (796) 115(84%) 136 Assistant City Fire 1 (1%) 0 0 0 115(99%) 116 Manager - Operations Human Resources 2(20%) 0 0 3(30%) 5(50%) 10 Parks & Recreation 6(10%) 0 2(3%) 6(10%) 46(77%) 60 Police 12 (8%) 0 2 (1%) 10(6%) 135 (85%) 159 • Division Tote! 21(6%) 0 4(1%) 19(6%) " 301(8796) t 345 Asa istant City Utitities 600%) 0 0 4 (6%) 52(94%) 62 Manager - Utilities Water Utilities 1 (2%) 0 0 3 (6%) 49(92%) 53 • ' Solid Waste 5 (9%) 0 2(4%) 15(27%) 34(60%) 56 j Electric Utilities 6(4%) 0 0 4(3%) 126(93%) 136 DWon Total 18(6%) ' 0 20%) 26(8%) 261 (W%) *7 F r t"' T i T' +lr; 38(6%) ! (196) i"o) 'l,{A96) 7i6 (849i);r P Empfnyee dwa as (01o, 1998, tiara d4 KS nrq im 1w a special eereement, seasanal, w Poor Itmpwary ayfgees. Div.' d,t 32 X O Mom a Workforce Analysis City of Denton vs. Civilian Labor Force By Gender City of Denton* Civilian Labor Force" 61a1c SAak 7U%- a,tkt.r. Sox k~ Ala+~'i; Femak _ Fenrk 0 -l~ s Expiayre data as iJAfay. 1998. ana dors not Include i;46af ajsrewml, #asonal, asd/a se%Wfary enpbyees. s• !VW Census • E+rydoyrd and Unnnpluyed bur avails A# for rinphryrMM. Pro/ecaQla hly 1996. Sorrce: fetal EnpfoyMeM Conasdlslan s! __32x ?.5 _ 10 i e r 0 f 1 P City of Denton Workforce Analysis Division By Gender/Age i Executive 'PW &vWon Female Male Over City Manager City Manager's Office 7(70%) 3(30%) 8000%) 10 Nvlslon Total :1 7(70%). 3 (3096) 8000%) 'Leo 4 C1ty Attorney (4496) 4(44%) k 9 , Mtuticlpal Judge MttnldPSI Jndge'a + r s+, * (Pr> Oftkt i'a'"klrvz f.'y" .41 ~F4s. ii d'w f4?: W~ 100%) 1, ~ ) 2 (100 iv) Deputy Engineering & City Manager Transportation 5(10%) 43(90%) 24(50%) 48 Facilities Management 2(18%) 9(82%) 6(35%) 11 Planning & 1 Development 21(58%) 15 (42%) 17(33%) 36 'i~ DMalon 7oW 7 ' {2946) b')f(7146j 47 ;49%) 6"A j Empbore dana as of May, 1998 Dose does nor lnrlwk Wdal agreemrnr, seasonal, arwor temporary ovOyees. 25 1 El 32XIO s 0 i s City of Denton Workforce Analysis Division By Gender/Age `fie;' Executive Division r >ii7 Fentale Male Over 40 Total 1z Assistant City Finance 4(36%) 7(64%) 7(64%) 11 Manager -Finance Management & Budget 19(95%) 1 (5%) 4(20%) 20 Fiscal Operations 36(100%) 0 18(50%) 36 Information Services 11 (61%) 1(39%) 13(72%) 18 Library Services 27(67%) 13 (33%) 19(48%) 40 LA.onomic Development 9(82%) 2(18%) 4 (36%) 11 Division Total 106(79%) 30(22%) 65(49%) f' 136 Assistant City Fire 8(7%) 108(93%) 69(59%) 116 Manager Human Resources 8(80%) 2(20%) 2(20%) 10 Operations s Parks & Recreation 20(33%) 40(67%) 28(47%) 60 Ponce 40(25%) 119(75%) 48(30%) 159 Division TOW 16(21%) 269(79%) 147(43%) ' 343 , Assistant City Manager Utilitie! Utilities 7(11%) 55 (89%) 26(42%) 62 - Water Utilities 10(19%) 43 (81%) 24(43%) 53 Solid Waste 5 (9%) 51 (91%) 30 (54%) 56 r Electric Utilities 23 (17%) 113(83%) 52 (38%) 136 Division ToW 45(15%) 262(83%) 132(43%) rli 307 904 Total s;.`•w 267 (3696) 637 (70%) 405(45%) Emplohre dala as of M o, 1998. Mra doer m I Include Wdal agreement, tear(eal. and/or fem1rorary vVlo )eer. bi~l as - - 25 X IO 32X IO i ,,:m.. 0 l #y~ Workforce Diversity Plan Update May, 1998 [X. Diversity Management Panel The Diversity Management Panel was created in direct response to Council approved ' recommendations by Diversity Consultant Dr. Ri.hard Lewis and the Council- appointed Diversity Task Force. Chaired by the Director of Human Resources, the Diversity Management Panel consists of fifteen (15) r pagers that have been designated to discuss, research and provide plans of action, to implement seven (7) recommendations from the Diversity Task Force. The Diversity Management Panel convened in May 1997 and disbanded in September 1997. However, the Management Panel managers retrain as a resource group to the Director of Hurnan Resources who is responsible for coordinating and monitoring the approved plans of action for the targeted objectives. The recommendations by Dt. Lewis and the Diversity Task Force were presented to the City Council by the City Manager in February 1997. These include: • Implement a Diversity Management Panel that will be responsible for implementing recommendations accepted by the City Council. • Expand the City's internship program with a recruitment component aimed at attracting minority and female college students. • Establish temporary mobility positions designed to allow individuals to cross-train and improve their opportunities for upward mobility. Two (2) to three (3) positions are to be created and located in the City Manager's office. Minority employees are to be targeter. • Consider training options for the unemployed and underemployed that would continue to support programs such as the Summer Youth Employment and Training program administered by the North Texas Education and Training Co-op. • Create an Employee Recruitment Plan designed to consolidate the recruitment activities in the Human Resources Department, rather than the existing departmental approach. This effort is to be adequately funded and include a focused approach to improve minority participation. 0 • Consider off-site Civil Service examinations. A systematic smdy should be conducted to determine the best off-site testing venues. • Update the City's compensation plan and bring pay ranges to 'market' as soon as possible. Improved recruitment efforts are contingent upon competitive pay. 0 Note: The last recomm^ndation regarding Disadvantage Business Enterprise Goals and the data collection methodologies associated with these goals were assigned to the Assistant City Mai,ager for Finance and the City Attorney's office, A Workforce Diversity Plan is included in the Finance Department Workforce I, Analysis section (page 53). 8 IS 25"10 32XIO 6 0 i Workforce Diversity Kra Cpdate May, 1998 X. Diversity Management Panel Research and Findings In order to maximize the management panel's research efforts, the Diversity Management Panel was divided into four (4) sub-groups, • Intenship Program • Mob'lity Positions • Training for the unemployed and underemployed • Employee recruitment plan and Off-site Civil Service Exams Their research and findings are summarized below: I. Internship Program The intern and administrative aide positions are temporary, part-time and entry level positions within the organization. Employees in these positions are itenerally pursuing a college degree and desire local goverrunow experience in local government to enhance their professional exp:riences and career marketability. Most interns and administrative aides work 20-30 hours per week for 3-6 months. The City has approximately nineteen (19) Interns In the General Fund artd forty (40) in Utilities. There appears to be an ample number of positions to provide training and upward mobility to females and minorities. However, only fifty-three percent (53%) o the total positions are filled. It is tNrefore staff "s intent to analyze these positions and appropriately classify them into market pay bands that will ,cable the organization to attract qualified individuals and create a diversified workforce where necessary. The overall employee demographics for intern and administrative :;de positions include; • 75% White i • 10.7% African American I • 10,7% Hispanic i , • 3,6% Asian The intern and administrative aide demographics more than exceed the demographics of our available civilian labor pool for Denton County. Unfortunately, we have few entry-level employment opportunities for these employees once their internships are completed. • 0 1 9 x[ x ~0 32 arlrnzs Workforce Diversity Plan Update May, 1998 2. Mobility Positions The proposed mobility positions would allow incumbents to rotate throughout work areas for training and development purposes. The mobility positions are designed to improve the incumbent's opportunities for upward mobility. These positions would work best as entry-level positions, preferably full time. The organization currently has management assistant positions that are full time. These positions require more education and or experience than the intern and administrative aide positions. Management assistant positions are viable options for upward mobility for interns or administrative aide employees as well. Therefore, these positions appear to be ideally suited for training and rotation within the organization. 3. Training for the Unemployed and Underemployed Currently, the organization participates in the Svmmer Youth and Training program administered by the North Texas Education and Training Co-op as well as the Texas Workforce Commission. The program assists the City in recruiting, training and retaining teenagers who desire work experience in local government at no cost. The Director of Human Resources chain the newly formed Advisory B,~srd to the North Texas Education and Training Co-op that is composed of representatives from major employee in Denton County. This board provides suggestions and directions in preparing employees for their respective organizations. 4. Employee Recruitment Plan Since the early 1980's, the City has developed an extensive recruitment schedule, specifically targeted for police, Fire and general organizational recruiting. Human Resources coordinates participation of nearly 100 recruitment trips or job fairs each year. There is generally a representative from Police, Fire and/or Human Resources at each recruitment site. Even though Human Resources represents and promotes other departments, there is certainly the opportunity for representatives from other departments to participate in the formal recruitment process. The current diversity budget is $16,150 designated io rover the cost of the City's recruitment activities. S Off-site Civil Service Examinations The sub-committee for this area requested a legal opinion finm Haynes and Boone to determine the feasibility and legality of off-site testing !or police and fire entry level exams outside of Denton, within or outside of the stare of Texas. 0 The opinion indicates affirmatively that the City may conduct polict and fire entry-level exams within the state of Texas. The opinion however, discwrages the City from off-site testing out of state. 10 I,J 1 e O r, TWO W Workforce Diversity Plan Update Stay, 1995 Chi logistics of off-site testing will be a major undertaking. However, it may 1 be well worth the effort if the City is able to increase its recruitment efforts to include minorities and women in public safety, specifically within the Fire " department that remains homogeneous. 6. City Compensation Plan The City of Denton developed an aggressive compensation plan for the 1997.98 fiscal year. It included efforts to move positions closer to the market s,j that the City could recruit as well as retain exceptional employees. The strategic plan spearheaded by the Human Resources Department includes recommendations to continue moving the current pay plan to be market driven over the next 2.3 years. XL Diversity Management Panes Recommendations Based on their research and findings, the Diversity Management Panel provides the following recommendations to further implement the Council adopted diversity goals: A. Increase the administrative aide and intern salaries to be competirive with the ` market. Current entry-level salary for the administrative aide, intern I and Il positions are $5.15, $5.91 and $7.78 respectively. These positions will be analyzed and appropriately classified into market pay bands that will enable managers to attract qualified individuals and create a diversified workforce where necessary, B. Consider uriliting the developmental tracking option 08 months of additional etperience and training to reach ni nimum qualifications of th., position) for employees demonstrating porentiat for apward mobility in ea^'i department, effettise May 1098. There is generally a lower cost associated with hiring employee on developnentat tracking (5% below entry salary), howev;r any additional cost would I,c incurred by the individual departments. C. Create t»a (1) - three (3) mobility positions to be rotate? from the City Manager's office (CM0) with the minimum qualifications of a bachelor degree in public administration or retated frrid. The condition of employment would include a 0 minimum two (2) year commitment and co^tinuation of their college education where appropriate Mobility positions will be created for fiscal year 1998-99 only if staff is able to find available funding, in addition, design and individual action plan iuxi schedule to include two years of training and development in four (4) to six (6) major departments such as: the CNIO, Finance, Utilities and Human Resources, Departmental rotation would be 4 p based upon employee interest, area of expertise and organizational teed. Include 1..rdiag for the mobility positions in the 1998.99 budget process for approval by _ouncil and implementation by staff effective October I, 1998. ll O , 6MM" r . xM! v 9 n.v pra.r r.. ..wwv~v ~ ~.i, ` l Workforce Diversity Plan Update May, 1998 I D. Continue City participation in the Texas Education and Training Co-op's Summer Youth Training program for fiscal yeas 199.9-2003, Additionally, encourage participating departments to conduct departmental new employee orientation to target position responsibilities and departmental expectations to enhance the program's effectiveness. Then is no salary or benefits cost associated with this i recommendation. E. Continue annual recruitment e&rs to include an increase In recruitment activities xfth local universities and technical colleges. Survey directors, managers and supervisors regarding upcoming recruitment needs. Include applications and an interviewing schedule where feasible to increase the pool of qualified applicants for open positions. Include representatives from the Workforce Diversity Committee and/or the departments on scheduled recruitment trips or job fain where feasible effective October 1, 1998. There is no recommendation for a budget increase for FY 1998-99. F. As a pilot progrun, conduct one (1) off-site test for the Fire Department for fiscal year 1998.94. 'fhe approximate cost will be $4-3,000 which would Include costs for recruiting, r-sting and post-testing (backgrounds). If the pilot program Is srxcessful, we recommend that the testing be expanded to include one (1) off-site testing per year in both Police and Fin. Include funding in the 1998.99 budget process for approval by Council and Implementation by staff effective October 1, 1998. 0. Continue to enploy aggressive compensation strategies toward building a market- driven compensation plan. Include compensation recommendations in the 1998-99 budget process for Council approval. H. Devise tracking system to evaluate opportunities to hire minorities, women and other protected class individuals. I Disband then redesign the Wor orce Diversity Community to be ccmprised of + r ' managers, as per the recommendation provided by Diversity Consultant Dr. Lewis effective October 1, 1998. .p rwM `p 1r • • 12 i r r~ r i ~ y~, - - irt x 10 32x0II o ' 1 i r i Y 1 I i i CITY COUNCIL . 0 J14 u~eaaa O sasaasss I r . CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Sorglegic Plan 1997-98 to 2001-02 Alayor arid Council I` ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive strategies that wuuld promote, maintain and create ssherc necessary diversity within citywide activities, task forces, comminecs, boards and commissions, 11. GOAL: To improve or maintain cityw ide activity, task force, committee, board and commission representation at levels that reflect the demographics of the community. MILESTONES BY FISCAL YEAR SIRAILCIES 97.98 98.99 "-00 00-01 0I-02 I When suggest ingor nominating new Complete M Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain memK-rs for boards and commissions, Available consider candidates frum all ethnic and ecunumic groups to ensure -44 representation level reflects demographics of community. 2 When forming a City lack force or Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain t commince,cndeavorto include Available rcprescntaGvrs from all ethnic and economic groups to ensure representation level reflects demographics of community. i 0 3. Implement strategies Ioeducate Complete As Sustain S!,stain Sustain Sustain ethnic and economic groups concerning Mailable membership resiwnsibilit% nicitywide wsk furce, committees, boards and commissions w encourage pa•l is i pation. I f' n,pcr ax' r 25 k 1❑ 32x0 1 rrs^:~ u , Y j j I I r CITY MANAGER 11 tiw; ~5 ❑ 32XIEJ PAN M" t: 1 r i City of Denton Workforce Analysis Ted Benavides, City Manager Division By Race . AeiAti NA Diridon 6lrck 1~ City Manager's Office 0 0 0 1(10%) 9(90%) 10 1, )It 14 OIL, Dlvtalon Cotrl i+ o! o >t (10% 9 t9b9i) y 1Y - i8 Division By Gender/Age Division vi,10 Fatale' Msiie' Over 40 4 Cotal City Manager's Office 7(70%) 300%) 8000%) 10 A Divido TOW 7('109%) 3(30%) S(100%) r 0 `f ! a Emp7rryer dale as,eAlay, 199A. Daiu drKa rwwlnclwk special arrnmrnf, sruax+ut, and/or kmpaary rmp7a7v:t. i Dirt drc ' o • o i i • City of Denton Workforce Analysis City Manager's Office Ted Benavides, City Manager Ract Age Gender American Black Asian Indlan Hispanic White Over 40 Under +0 $dal 96 Female 7 ! 7 7096 Male 1 2 3 3 ,3096 Tidal 1 9 s 10 °A 10% 90% 10096 Race Age Gender Amman Wink Indian 091. A llulunk under 40 o% M,r Au~a \ S IU% M% U"F o • M'h ire 09'1 10 K'r70%k 41% IOUs r Cmplenxr &da as of May, I W8, nale dun Mfg im rdr t1wld arrerwa, uasonal, and/or Iraparary a irkyrrs, V..f r ~lailJ`1nr. iLU1 . e C t CITY OF UF:NTON Workforce Diten4 Strategic Plan 1997.98 to 2001.02 City Manager's Office I, ISSUE Devise and employ aggressive strategics to maintain and create where nectssary a divercifled workforce that reflects the demographics of yualifitd members of ourcommunity within each department ordi0sion while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process, II 60AL: 1'a improve where necessary or maintain employee workforce makeup levels that reflect the demographics of yuahricd members or the community, while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process, MILLSIUNES BY FISCAL YEAR SIRA IEGIFS 97.98 98.99 99.00 00-01 01-02 I, 'A hen in City's best interest, post Comptcle As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain openings inichur and exterior to get Available group of applicants * 2, Coordinate with human Resources to Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain • ensure job opportunities are posted at Available protected class group colleges and universities, 3 Use careful consideration to male and Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain protected class group applicants that Availatle are qualified, meet all jub requirements, I • and pass reference check. , 4. Devise tracking system to naluate Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain opportunities to hire minorities, women Available and other protected class-individuals i ~ mar dK I 5 10 3?X i i ~YLt 0 1 CITY OF DYNTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-9P to 2001-02 City Alanager's Office I. ISSM Devise and employ aggressive strategies that would maintain and create where necessary diversity within employee-related activities, task forces, and committees. 11. GOAL To improve or maintain employee-related activity, task force end cummittee representation at levels that re,leci the demographics of the community. MILESTONLS BY HSCAL YEAR SIRA'ILGILS 97.99 9899 99-00 00-01 01-02 I, Men form ingemploy ce-related Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain wsk force or committee, endeavor to Available include representatives fram all a uric and economic groups to ensure representation. level reflects I demographics of community. N 2. Implem°nt strategies to educate Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain empluyee. conceming membership Available responsibility in employee-related I task furces and commitees to encourage participation. f i ` is `0 mgr J+.K 2 r~ry}. a_;tlQ 32xI7 1 v li a1101iiN 0 t t 1 i } CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan i { 1997-98 to 2001-02 City Afanager's Office 1. ISSUE: Devise and employ strategies that encourtoe the work force to celebrate the divcrsity of the community. 11. GOAL! To improve or maintain awareness of the diversity of the community. -------------~---`-~MILESTONESI3YFISCAL YEAR S1RA11 LGILS 9M9 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-0- I 1.nsure City Manager's Office and CumElcte As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain If stull'parlicipatrin oil diversiy' Asailable ` training and awareness acnl ltivs 1 nsure departmental repieser ion Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain r, on in-house workforce diversity Available commincc, l ' ,fi 1 l 1 3. hnsure city participation und'or Complete As Sustain Suslaiu Sustain Sustain represcneatiun in diverse community Available organitatlons. ~ ' I h i 1 C mar d,k 3 i 32x10 25 Q 1 i I i G M 1 ' • CITY ATTORNEY 1 A " O • I I City of Denton Workforce Analysis City Attorney's Office }{erb Prouty, City Attorney Race A e Gender American Black Asian Indian Hispanic White Over 40 Under 40 '11'otol % iii Female 4 l 3 4 44% Male 1 4 3 2 $a 56% ibtal 1 8 4 S 9 1196 8991 4496 56% 1 i Race Age Gender \ Asian II'S ana 1 119; V Aro man IM am , i i Pemak Hl.k Oval 40 UmkiM - 414 4A Mak • ~i# >e~ O While I F foyer dma as aJM ay, 19VA Duna dal AM i4d wk mjrn'kd aYreemral• lemon!, aM/a rr m~ mparary enydoyrn. or. 5-\I~~y Q~ ¢ 1.~r F l..A$74i4ki a ` t . J 3 C. x• r s , suaa:o 0 • CITY OF DENTON Workrorce Dhersity Strategic Plan 1997.98 to 2001.02 Gry Attorney's Ojfrce i iSSUL lhvise and employ aggressive strategies to maintain and create where necessary a diversified %misrurce that rellws the demographics of qualified members of our eonununity within each department or divisive while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process. 11 GOAL, To improve where necessary or maintain employee viAl'orce makeup levels that relied the demographics of qualified members ul' the community, while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process. SIRA'IRAUS I Request in the 1998.99 budge( funds to allow attorney vacancies to be advertised in the texas Bar Journal and the texas Law)er, both statewide pubtications, in addition to the 1) FW newspapers so that a larger pool ul'qualilicd minorities will be on notice of such facancies in the City Attorney's Olnce „ 2. Should a vacancy arise in the 97.98 budge) )ear, pose notice of such vacancy in the placement of ice for texas Southern University Law School, ~ Houston, Texas (which has a predomicant Af6can•American student burly) and St. Mary's University Law School, San Amonio, (eras (which has a • high Hispanic student enrollment) i i l Identify newspapers which cater to minority cultures through circulation area or native language (r. X. newspapers which adsertise on TV or radio I stations wide high minority listening audiences and which may be printed in Spanish or Vietnamese). a. Request in the 1998-99 budget funds to allow support staff vacancies to be advertised in newspapers which have a predominam minority circulation area. 1 w lagal arc - 25x 10 32x ❑ o } t taraa!avr 1 ti CITY OF DENTON Workforce Dh ersNy Slrrfegle Plan 1997-99 to 2001-02 CJfy Atrorncy'r OfJ1rc - I, ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive strategies Iho would maintain and create where necessary diverAy within employee-rclared adisiries, task forces and committees. 11. GOAL, To improve or maintain employee-related activity, task force and committee represemation at levels that raped the demographics of the community, $1 RA1WWS I In oral communications and written ci,;ds reports to council members and staffrepurts to the City Manager's staff, the City Attorney's (i will encourage the selection of minorities to Council or employee-related committees, task forces, boards and commissions when the opportunity for our ul'lice's input allows same. 2. The Cil) Attorney's Once will encourage staff members' participation in social cultural City activities and provide recognition at slaff'mectings to stai'r' t ` memisen who attend such arr ia. Staff members w ill be encouraged to continue to attend meetings involving diverse citizen groups. r~. 1 A Iryal dx 2 4 1 1 112540 ` 32XIO -mill 7raensai 0 waver ' r j I i CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-98 to 2001.02 1710Rfforney's OjJ1re 11SSUE Devise and employ aggressive strategies that will exemptify the City Attorney's Office's recognition thet the great strength of the American system of democracy has always come from diversity. 11. GOAL: To improve or maintain our office's involvement in community measures which encourage cultural awareness and sensitivity through education and participatiun S1RATEGILS I. to the extent aIIuwed by the ('anons of Ethics, encour•-Vi assistant city at torneys to give pro a rrru legal advice to non-profit trJucationaI and cultural organitatiuns not in a conflict of interest with the City which promote ethnic and cultural awareness and sensitivity and allow discretionary time tube used for such advice. 2. Provide City Council w ith annual report of pro hums legal hours expended by assistant City attorneys on projects of non-prurit cultural orgamitaliuns which r. Ilea the demographics of our community. . 3. Incourage members of our staff to become familiar with the history and traditions of various ethnic groups and different cultures representative of our community. a I IS / t'ncx umge staff members to learn another language, such as Spanish, to improve understanding of other cultures ' f 1 1, al dtK 1 ~~1 k 2510 32x10 s ti,`d rya r r . HIMOR ' gnaw= : j I 1 4 i i 4 I 1 Ji p fk 1 1 I I 1 • I 1 1~1 MUNICIPAL JUDGE r.. a Q SJMeCNf% O 7 City of Denton Workforce Analysis Municipal Judge's Office Robin Ramsay, Municipal Judge Race A Gender American Black Asian Indian 146 panic While Over 40 Under 40 otil, 96 Female 1 t ;1 so% Male 1 1 1 s096 Tolwl 2 2 % 100% 10096 r Race Age Gender 11I.Ank Art rinn Under 10 hVilan ox n4loi nv nx Nilul ft, FeaNk 30% whilt t I(X)% t; Mr Over b 1001 ~a Erry lo) et data as of may, 1948, Data dcwf ml include eperw alrermeel, .ealdWl, oad/or temporary employers. r ♦ r r ..-r. ''I 3 2 0 1 E i k` 4 Y F f Y 1 • 1 DEPUTY CITY MANAGER * Enalneering do Tmwporlafon * Fncllldei Miuoemen! 0 * Pimnlos & Development 0 • r' ?5 f~ 32 x 10 r AML -MALAIffi~-q%ML-%IIL mom s • o City of Denton Workforce Analysis Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager Division By Race Divlslon Buck Aaiun Am.1, Hiepnalc White Total Engineering & Transportation 3 (10 St) 0 0 14(29%) 29 (61%) 48 Facilities Management 0 0 0 1 (9%) -10(91%) 11 Planning & Development 3 (85A) 0 0 2(6%) 31(86%) 36 Division Totn1 8(8%) 0 0 17 (18%) 70 (74%) 93 r l Division By Gender/Age Divislon Female Mak ; Over 40 Total • Engineering & Transportation 5(10%) 43(90%) 24(50%) 48 Facilities Management 2(18%) 9(82%) 5(55%) 11 Planning & • Development 21 (58%) 15 (42%) 17 (53%) 36 • xr INrtalon Totat 28 (29%) 67(71%) 47(.43%) " 95 fmpln3rr darer ar JMqv. 1994, hula diver noa lurfadr rrxdnl a„rr, mrn7, uarannl, arel,br frnykrrarr rmp7gee. r DiO a., I 32Xl❑ e 0 a City of Denton Workforce Analysis Engineering & Transportation Jerry Clark, Director Race A Gender American A' r Black Asian Indian Hi, a While Over 40 Under 40 Female 2 1 2 3 2 14% Male 3 13 27 21 22 Tolal 5 14 29 24 24 'v - r `A i ' . ' % 10%j 19% 6196 5096 5096' a Race Age Gender F Asian Amokan IV: (A Indian NIut1 I U% lhsr'nk ' u 241{ `'r~.i r UrvJrr 111 Ovor w 1 `I'lriM1 1uyy^~ TJ4J+~ht~ ~1~ 11,E 90% Is . 0 WAinr Mak 61% ~ 90% +d' Employee dais as of May. iWJ Data das as lmiwdr sperfd aereemenl. sta:aaal, awd/or tea aisrary earplaytes. t IV r t .aarusw i F 1 .t i CITY OF DL,NTON I Workforce Diversity Stralegic Plan 1997-9810 2001-02 Engineering d Transportation I I ISSUE'. Nvise and employ aggressive strategies to maintain and create where necessary a diversified workforce that reflects the demographics of qualified members of our communlh within each department or division while maintaining a race a,rd gender neutral Airing, selection and promotion process. ll. GOAL: To improve where necessary or maintain employe-,orkforce makeup levels that reflect the demographics of qualified members of the community, while maintaining a race and genuer neutral hiring selection and promotion process. M1LLS1UNESbS FISCAL'tLAR S'iRA'lI'61LS 91.98 98.99 99-00 00-01 01-02 I Improve or inaintain workforce Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain diversity where necessary by giving Immediately' careful consideration to qualified j ^ candidates. I , r • 2, Aggressively' advertise and recruit Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain in targeted areas to attract goatificd Available minorities. .1 Participate w ith Iluman Resources in L'amplete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain career days at large ed colleges and Available universities - I I na tram do I t zr'i I AX Cj 't 2XIO l 1 i CITY OF DEN 1'ON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997.98 to 2001-02 Engineering & Transporfaflom 1 ISSUE: Devise one employ aggressive straiegies that would mai vain and crone where necessary diversity within employee•rchved aaivitics, [ask forces and committees IL GOAL.' To impruvr or maintain employee-related ac6 ity, task furor and cummivee representation at levels that r; Ilia the demographics of the cummunity, IN1111 S IONLS BY F ISC AL YEAR S1Risl'L:GIL:S 97.98 98-99 99.00 00.01 01.02 I. Recommend and encourage Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain pinicipation of minurity emplo)ces Available on City committevs(insurasiLe. diversit), open house). .nv 2, RotateparticipationofallEngineering/ Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain . Transportation emplu)ces on City Available committees. , F' . i , i ' w I nelran due 25 ~0 32x10 y ,xcarma o , i tea,.. C'ITV OF DENTON Workforce Dh ersity Slralcgic Pion 1997.98 to 2001-02 Engbfeerbtg A Trarsporlarlon I ISSLU oevive and employ strategies to -.1p retain productive employv7s. j 11 GOAL, To impruve or maintain where necessary turnover ratio. MILESTONES BY IISCAL YEAR 1 SIRATLUILS 97.99 99.99 99.00 00.01 01-02 I L Actively use develot"cntal tracki g Cumplele As Suvtaln Sustain Sustain Sustain policy to increase applicant pool Available 2. I'ruvidetraining opportunities to Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain allemployees, Olfcraddilional Immediately opportunities to at-risk employees and'or rhuse who request additional training, 7 3. Mect indivlduilly with employees Irnplenlem Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain on is regular basis to solicit COmmCM3 Imme liately and concerns. Accommodate if po sible and practical r J Reduce organitathtnal confusion • Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain blxkage Show appreciatiun for Immediately employees; recognite, encourage v, and reward outstanding performance 'All CHH%MI regularly through staff meetings, memorandums, newslclie s and other appropriate mediums of conmunicalion. w w I Inelwn do 3 - - - - - 25 x 10 32X' 0 ~,Wl 14 O C1 v • i City of Denton Workforce Analysis f Faculties Management Bruce Henington, Manager Race A e Gender American Black Asian Indian His c White Over 40 Under 40 96 Female 2 2 2 1891 male 1 8 4 5 9 8296 Total 1 10 6 5 °k 996 9196 SS96 4596 Race Age Gender E 1 "pall, fnruk Aran i y' Eel{ I I'A e ENI1 Under 40;';y4i•~`;i Amrn~xn 43% IiJuii ~.$`~7b 1.f z t *d4 u I Liver 40 t y'EigN!'y rare f.. is% 44 Mek ~ i71{ " 1 wn„e via I i ~;aylvyn daEa ar rrJMay, 1 Sh1R parr dun m4 Ui ludr iperla! atmmtw, ~tasrwul, and/or rnrywra7 nEgnluyrn. i r 32 \ f ~ f LI . ' 1 l '~I I 1 ( J ' S. 1 t' r 11 V I f r ' .fit ~ir r 1 e e y` T e CITY OF DENTON y Workforce Diversity Strategic Flan ' 1997.98 to 2001.02 "r EaciliNes Management j 1, ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive strategics to maintain and create where necessary a diversified workforce that reflects the I demographics of qualified members of our community within each department or division while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring selection and promotion process. II. GOAL: To improve where necessary or maintain employee workforce makeup levels that reflect the demographics of qualified members of the community, while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process. MILES10NES SY FISCAL YEAR SIRA111GIE.S 91.99 98.99 99.00 00.01 01.02 I. Assess departmental representation and Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain comparison to demographics of the ` community. 2. Research and implement internship Research Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain 1 y • program in cor.,unctiuu with the depattmenttargeting persons of under represented groups. f r li I to ~ !w aw ~ _ 1 Its: 10 3'2X 10 i 1' • 1 ,J ~ f M1 t~l 1 ~'I t ' I r . p 1 t yt S , I CITY OF' DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan ' 1997.98 to 2001.02 j Facilities Management 1 I ISSUE: Devise and empluy aggressive strategies that would maintain and create %here necessary diversity within emyluyee•relaled activities, trsk forces and committees. II. GOAL: To improve or maintain employee-related activity, task furce and committee represenlauon at levels that renect the demugraphics of the community MILESTONES BY FISCAL YEAR ~I StRA1EGIES 91.98 98.99 99.00 00-01 01.92 I Ensure that departmental appulntmcnls Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain to city actin it l:s. c,mrniItces and task forces rettaelthe diversity of the community % l). 4 I+ + b r.ew 2 se T d tr a r ` r.t i t c. 2 • a o e ti I c~ - t - ' 'III t CITY OF DFNTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-98 to 2001.02 Facilities Alanagemenr I ISSUE: [-vise and employ aggressive strategies to create and awareness and appreciation of diversity within the dcparlm mi and H ithin the City of Iknton. 11 , GOAL. To improve or maintain an awareness and appreciation oremployee diversity. MILESIONLS BY FISCAL YEAR , STRAILGILS 97.98 98-99 99-0o M-01 01-02 ! Ensure thal all dvpanmenl employees Assess and'or Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain have panicipaled in reyulred dversity Schedule training. 2 F'osler a departmental culture where the Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain benefits of diversity are appreciated i w J sac dk 3 Iµy , ,rui, " ' ~5 x 10 32X10 wi 0 0 City of Denton Workforce Analysis Planning & Developmentil' David Hill, Director Race Age - ; r C}bidle American Black Asian Indian Hispanic White Over 40 Under 40 Female 2 2 17 8 13 1, AS Male 1 14 9 6 • I' 1S 426 Total 3 2 31 17 13 °k 8% 0 _ 4696 3396 ' lmdndrr Plannin,t, Commwiiry Deveh pmrnl, Building lnrprrriont, and Con miner Health di14slons. Race Age Gender 1Enrank Avian MtKrwm {IA Indian EII,A"~ S a x Mete Urnkr 10 remit 41% 14 111 r'.~~,µr SI% ~y~r J Over 4O 7711 ' / 0 While Ie % w 00 f.mpluyre data ar rV May, IWA Dma dart np Imlude Ipalal agar nrnl, rearawl, aid or u rrpurary arp/oyrrr. 3 2 s O 1 f 1 I v ,r I CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Slraleglc Plan 1947-98 to 2001-02 { Planning A Denelopmew L ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive strategies to maintain and create where necessary a diversified moAlorce that relhtits the demographics of qualified members of our community within each &partmenl or division while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring selection and promutioo process. II. GOAL: To improve where necessary or maintain employee %orkrorce makeup levels that rerIco the demographics orquulilied members or the community, %hile maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process, MILLSTONES BY FISCAL YEAR STRAILGILS 97.98 98-99 99.00 00.01 01.02 Continue aggressively recruiting Continue Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain qualified applicants locally, regionally and nationally where opportunities arise rv 2 Partner with lluman Resources, Implement Sustain Jrstain Sustain Sustain participating In career day prograrns by sending planningempluyces or relevant career infonnation. i i r I jV 'p pl in die c>3't+. , 25 ri I a 32 X10 r y I n Y aaaww I { CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-98 to 2001.02 Planning A Development 1, ISSUL: Devise and employ, oggressise strategics that vsouhl maintain and create where necessary' diversity w ilhin cmpluyce-related actisitics, task forces end committees. II GOAL! To improve or maintain employee-related sciisity, task force and committee represcniatiun at lock that reflect the d vnngraphics of the community. MILLSTNNLS BY HSCAL YLAR S'IRA 'ILGtt;S 97-98 98.99 99-00 00-01 0t-02 I bnprme and maiglain where necessary Assess & Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain discrse rcprescmation of planning lmptemcni employees on al City employee committees, 2. Rotate participation ofpt°nning Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Susrain ,t • employees on all City committees 3. Continue to work through the I lousing Continue Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain & Urban Development Department with minority' & women business enterprises, i ptun aw Z 10 321' • s i ,arnvuer , L 1 . M1 CITY OF DENTON Workforce Div ersity Strategic Plan k 1997.98 to 2001.02 ' Planning A Development 1 ISSUE: Devise and employ strategies to develop all employees. 11 GOAL: Fo develop employees, personally and puoNssionaIly. M ll. BY FISCAL YEAR S1 RA11,611(S 97.98 98.99 99.00 00.01 01.01 I. Research & implement intcmal training Begin & Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain oppurtunhlcs with a culturaVreglunal Implement diversity emphasis, 2 Isrovidetraining oppontanitiesOil Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain promote sensitivity and tolerance of all persons, I,t personality assessments, diversity training, etc, 2. Research & encourage employees Research & Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain voluntary participation in community Recor,mcnd service-based organizations and projects, i plan J.4 25 10 32x' 10 . 1 r - A p t a+n'.: w r[:'N,h'.'uW .+nn MYn.Wr.bvw• . E I ^ I I . 1 I I i 4 { 1 I i t ~ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER-FINANCE f * Finance * Finance Management & Budget * Fiscal Operations * Information Services * Library Served * Economic Development * Ftonnc Pl" x * Bueinds Enterprise Pin ` i r I a , 10 32XIO,j 111111W 61 AJI . • o , is own 7 r City of Denton Workforce Analysis Kathy DuBose, Assistant City Manager Division By Race D1vWon Blark Asian Atr.l. Hispanic White " Total Finance" 0 0 0 2(18%) 9(82%) 11 Management & Budget 1(5%) 1(5%) 0 0 18(90%) 20 Fiscal Operations 3 (14%) 0 0 5(14%) 26(72%) 36 Information Services 1(6%) 0 0 1(6%) 16(88%) 18 Library Scrv :es 3 (8%) 0 0 1(3%) 36(89%) 40 l conomic Development 1 (9%) 0 0 0 10(91%) 11 J Division Total 11 (8%) 1(1%) 0 9 (7%) 115(84%) 136 1 Division By Gender/Age Division tresnJe Mate Over 40 Total JIJ ° I Finance' 4 (36%) 7(64%) 7(64%) 11 Management & Budget 19(93%) 1(5%) 4(20%) 20 Fiscal Operations 36(100%) 0 18(30%) 36 ° 1nformatir~n Services 11(61%) 7 (39%) 13 (72%) 18 Library Services 27(67%) 13 (33%) 19(48%) 40 ° Economic Development 9(82%) 2 (18%) 4(36%) 11 Division Toted " 106(78%) 30 (21%) 6.4(49%) 136 a '/mltxlrrf'rnnnrr,ldminis7ra(L!n, pvrrhaomg, Eruornnlrl7ndapment, A Warehouse, 4+ Emplmre darn as r~ Mo. 1999, Dada drwi not 1ndide special agreUnent sea.s(Mal, amkoe re"niry etykM n m I Dirt d.k 2.9) A0 32XID 0 0 o I City of Denton Workforce Analysis Finance* Kathy DuBose, Assistant City Manager Race Age Gender Amerkan Black Asian_ Indian Hiap.nic White Over 40 Under 40 'Co/at % Female 4 3 1 4 36% Male 2 S 4 J = 7 64% Total 2 9 7 4 !l % 18% 82% 64% 3696 !nrlarles finance Adrninislrolion, Purchasing, Auditing, warehouse, and Manicipat Court dieisim. Race Age Gender IAR MiYn Hm`I n~ s llnkr w Amvnrvn US 1 f'emYk • . y 761f r 4 Over 40 O W % Male . ws White c,,Y' Ats f' Fny luya duru at of May, iYflA, Data dor! Ora Inciwh 1pKia1 asreeavnl, seasonal, and/or fe"rary egnioyees. i~ J,nr .,'Vf ! M M 1 ry'. 8y J 1.J ,e! X L~r 0 0 City of Denton Workforce Analysis Finance Management & Budget* Jon Fortune, Director Race Ale Grndtr . Antirrlcan r Black Asian Indian Hb Ic WNW Over 40 Under 40 ` Female 1 1 17 4 1S 93% Male L `-l -596 iulal I 1 18 4 16 20 2096 80 rr ~h 596 S96 ml" 771 In,iudfl Anuunling. rw, and Sudgrl d4is1aw. r Race Age Gender Aaiun Auarknn !t \ hill inn Mao N, J? 11"PanK Dver 40 hld,Y 011 20% While L' 9G♦ Femnk M F. yhPyrr drug as of slay, 1990. Islas, d we Rd ln,iude Im lal agr'sewser, rratanal, and/(V Jtevilvary rryrlayro. ~ x . 3 1 r~ I U I1 M1 n City of Denton Workforce Analysis Fiscal Operations* Diana Ortiz, Director Race A ender American Black Allan Indian Illg nk White Over 40 Under 40 Female S S 26 1s Is ` 1 X 36 100% Male 1 ,lt~k;pr Nei S S 16 Is 1s ek 4%1 1 14% 71% 30% 5096 ? . • lnrludrr Cu.nwner Service, Caehlrring and Municipal Court drNalon.r, i Race Age Gender Mien Mxrkan U% InJnn Male ule.1 0% o% I{ S Hi14% I/% I Llmkr 40 Wn 40 w% !U% ~ t ~Y 1r While Femek 72% IW% 6u p7oyee Alta at of May, 1998 tAw doer &V breLule rperlal agrenanu, mimal, Wlw re"f) eayakoyeer. y I Nola ~MMALMMALMRLMLJMMA ~ I O i • { City of Denton Workforce Analysis Information Services" Alex Pettit, Director Race A it Gender American r Black Asian Indian Hia c WWte Over 40 Under 40 % Female 1 1 9 9 2 33 63% Male 7 4 3 1,',1''' i` 7 39% Total 1 1 16 13 8 le °%5 6% r 6% 88% 72% 28% • lnrhedvs WorrnnNas Servires andAdminlsirailke Senlres divlsiom. Race Age Gender Amcrkan L.G~° Ili Mask Asian 9S M x i ex e ~ ~ antler Nl Win u'1 Mile k"k Over W 611E KTiK 711< M byloyee dala as o/May. IWN. Oola Mi me 1mr66le spnW arrienwas, seasonal, aedw Iesselarary tgrkyeei 0 0 City of Denton Workforce Analysis Library Servlces• Eva Poole, Director Race _ r A p American r,,+; Y„ Black Asian Indian Hi spank White Over 60 Under 60 '[1olt►I %y' Female 1 26 16 13 : , ~7 67% Male 2 1 10 5 b •33% Total 3 1 36 19 21 40 e7o 8% 3% 89% 48% S2% • Lu lades lJbrnry Arlin nlnmlivn, Cmmlafim Terhniral SerWrei, Children'i Senierl, and 8ranrh dMstonr. Race Age Gender A,r Aim Irdi+it Iinpenlr reu A Male ))II ~ r-o.ei Itl /ll VrWer b 171 o 1 emalt ' M'hhe 6){ 4 ~ 1Yf{ A . fmrlgre data of of Mry, lVS+b 1)ala dote) nor lnrhrdr 7perla! a~reraam, iearwaf, andlor lenyoorary elrphryerr. '519 ~•'~p A ~.~~x B { sa 0 .:'4;«0,44 Y City of Denton Workforce Analysis Economic Development* Linda Rsulff, Director Race A n& American . B6,A. A&Ian Indian Hispanic White Over 40 Under 40 % Female 1 B 3 6 9 82% Male 2 1 1 '3 18% 1,0181 _ 1 10 4 7 11 % 996 91% 36% 644. - 1nr7iedri Airpuri and Eranmu r fkw1opmem diniim. 1-.I Race Age Gender 1 A,ien Ile yank' Amarkrn Mek f , In1kn II% S yi i1 U% (het 40 Urkkt 40 64 % whhe 91% Fettuk !'ey,loyre Jura ai yfAfay, 1V9d. l7ak1 Awl naf Inclyde rprrlal arrrrmenl, uaeaal, 04d/61 kwpoeery etgnloyeu. ell • I aarnenw 1 UTV OF DFNTON Workforce Diversity Slraleglc Plan 1997-98 to 2001.02 Finance' I. ISSUL: Devise and employ aggressive strategies to n6wain and credit where ni a diversilitJ workforce that rcllects the demographics of qualified members of ourcummunhy within each depurtmcnl or Jrvision while mainlaiuing a rite and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion prucess. II GOAL: To improve rnhtre necessary or maintain ernplu)te workl'urce makeup Iuvels that reltecl die demographics of qualltiecl members ul' the communi y, while uminlaining a ras't and gender neutral hiring, selctlion and prumulion process. MILLS IONES BY FISCAL YLAR S I kA 11 611 S 97.98 98-99 99.110 110-01 01-02 r i Insuieallcmnplu)eesu0enddi aersity Sustain Susl,lin Swwin Sustain Stioain and C'usey training and ina+rpurale renewal sessions during the year. 2 Aclively pursue'recruit via wldelp As Needed As Needed As Needed As NceJeJ As Needed sdvenlsed jub opprmunities including professional publications, university. professional urganitadons and minority publiculion. 3. Develop and Include In budget process Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual annual cuntracl w ith Ddllas Morning News and Fun Wonh Star Telegram advertising job opportuniies, '7..rua Und7 acid Strmrgier Jw /Oianr.4dnrrnuaearsrn, i$ h:rarng, Iredhang, 11 ruel;nuw, 11ururgad r'owr, Arr'uariling. Tar, Midg s. I'a'lemur Awrrnv, flebinning, l is Ji u ni,nurn ,l'rrvrrrr, Admmi Nrernv Gmravr, 1 r M drT ,%'o a er 'told f lvrmmu t h i d(I'mod O fmdN l fi'r' 10 32x10 1. 1 c n , rast'alw ; C ITV OF DENT ON Workforce Diversity Stralegic Plan 1997.98 to 2001-02 1~7narrc<' ` I. ISSUL':: MMse and empluy aggresslve sualcglei to maintain and create where necessary a diversified workforce that reflects the demographics of qualified members of our community within each deparlinent or division while maintaining a rice and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process, li. DUAL, to improve where necessary or maintain empluyee workforce inakeup levels that ri:111w the demographics ofqualificd mcin k-rs of the community, while maintaining a race and gender neutral hirsq, selection and promotion process. M111STUNFS BY FISCAL YLAR S I KAII LUIL S 91.49 98-99 994l 00.01 01.02 4 (bmmil to accompany Human Resources As Needed As Needed As Needed As Needed As Needed in Career Day prugrants and'ur provide relevant career infonnetion. A , S Use'promole the use of luition As Needed As Needed As Neelkd As Needed As Needed . reimbursernem as a devclopmenl tool 6. L2evelopmcnt of F'inance'l,ibrary web Develop Sustam Sustain Sustain sustain pages on the City's webshe, y 1. Continue to malnlain presence at Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual un ik a rsil ics a is pre senta tons/ i.'., nreuUring programs', pursue at the • high-school level. '11.1ur. u,Kd find S}ruregier I.* I innate : IdnN,tnll'dri 1.1, !'an hoIinit, III diong, II owA"w.le, ,10,"1'4107 (u'irr, Art tu,AI pig, put. Budgrl, f'LJiUmrr LII m er ( "Wilervng, ' btpormalion Stn itri,Adopoicclrlrtnr scri0(I.J. Li 1i Sir, vkrr 1Un!Lroihlin ii'fh' 14 I(j'moitl r nn dkx 2 x 1a 32xiIJ arasseu i Q r 1r raeraew , r C'I'I'Y OF DFN,rON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-99 to 2001-02 riff 010ce I ISSUII, IX-vise and empluy aggressive strategies to maintain snJ create %here necessary a diversified Aurklorct thin rctlccts the demographics of qualilied members of our community within each department or divirlou chile maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process. ll. COAL', To impruve where necessary or maintain eorpluyce %orkfurce makeup levels that reflect the demographics of qualilied members of the cornmunity,'Ahile maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selcokm and promotion process. MIiESUONI:SBYFISCAL YFAR SIRAILfill'S 9798 9699 99-00 UU-01 U1-U2 4. Commit to accumpany I lumrm Resources As Ncir&d As Needed As Needed As Needed As Needed In Career Day programs and'or provide relevant career Information, S. Use'prornotc the use of tuition As Needed As Needed As Needed As Needed As Needed j . reimbursement as a developownt loaf 6. Development of Pit, ance'Library Neb Develop Sustain Sustain Sustain sustain f pages on the Ciry's %cbshe. 7. C u ninue to maintain presence at Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual universities via presentations! . mcnluring programs; pursue of the high-school level, •Lnvr, rJn,il ~rnJ Srrurrg!rafrrr Pururnr;IJnrrnrarr,morr, Pnrrhrrrrrrg, rhodrialy, It'urvhnrae .lhinfcywl ('aura, ArruanrinK, 7'ut Badgrr r'unonivr Sep 10, v. '01 ill, r1olig ~ hil~>rmulrurr J'rrvh'rr, Admurirlrulin.G'na+va,lrMdq'Sirrlrrr ❑nJ l:rununtle lLnd,ynnvnl tin a.a 2 i ~1 x la :25 2xa , ulsaut+ I i .rwwc , , i { l , t C'FIN OF DENTON 1Vorkrorce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997.98 to 2001-02 Finance" I, ISSl1E Oevisr and employ aggressisr strategies that aouW mainlain snd ereutr sshere necrssary Jisrrsily within cmplu) ec•relutrJ actisities, NA forces and cumrniuers. II GOAL: 1u impruse of mainlain employee-related aciisity, task furce and committee representation m lescls Ihul reflect die uoutographics al' the community MIL LS [ONES DY I ISCAL YEAR SIKAILOILS 97.95 98.99 97-VU OP-UI UI•U2 I staggered rumion of dcparhncau As Nccded As Needed As Needed As Needed MO. 1-d cmplo)ce reprcsenlatises on ciy lli-annual 13i-annual lli-annual 13i•annual Fii•c.mual C ow I rt illccI 2 iderilifyheekpotentialreprrscntatises On-going On-going Ongoing On-going On-going lu recuntmcnd lo Council or Cal, Manager for appoinlincnt to boerdsculnmissions, etc I. 3. Actiscly publlclaersolicil allendance Annual Annual Annuo~ Annual Annual al annual boards and cornmisslons reception. 4 laiminate'sunsel wuucessary %olunleer As Needed As Needed As Needed As Needed As Needed groups in order loespand (free-up) limited suluntecr pool. `y8tr'Aire, Umd mid.s'rr u4 Kira Jar Anmrnw 4dni i n i srr,ni on. PYr, hising. Auda"ng II'urrhown dfworgwl Casa, Jwaunnng, 7as. Weil, I'u.,lomr r.%o oce, Caahwrng, U bi/'Hn'allnn5rni,fir, .fdmirmrrulirr 3errlrrr, Iibrw)lirorices and I comma. I k lic1q,nnrrr IJ In kw - 1 15 0 32 ease an Y' 1 r ~ I ~ Y I ! . Jameaj" e Warm i t S ' CITV OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-98 to 2001-02 I~ r1hance" I. ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive strategics that woule maintuin and create where necessary diversity within City activities, task furces, committees, boards and commissions, II. GOAL To Improve or mainwin City activity'lask furce ommin"e board!cunimission representation et levels that rellrct the demographics or the cumrnunily. MILLS IUNE5131' fISCAI. YEAk S I RAI LUILS 97-98 91.99 99.00 IW-01 01.01 3. Cburdinatr volunrecr efTurts as a resource Un-guing on-going On-going Un-going 011-going V y (pool) through local service clubs, ntighburhuucl groups, etc. 6, publish application forms'description Un•guing On-going On-going On-going On-going 4 nt for boards and commissions, etc, in newspapers, on-line, parks and S recreation play brochures and citizens nrwslener. ~P 'lviur. fh Ki7 miJ IYratrgleaJ~,w PLrdn,e.ldmfnrrlralfr~n, 1hYr~Nwnig, .4u Jihng, lRnelwore, Alurorllti+7 Cuurr. 4rr~YurVrng, Tint HrrJgrr, e'a.ibYxav',4rrL r. 1 brlncrm~, y lrV'rniannn ken rres, 4dm~nUlydfirr 5'rn irro, library&n irer and l rommi, lb-eel.ywiew IVn aw I ~#'A r 32 X 0 s 0 h ales I t 5 1 i I CITY OF DFNTON Worktorce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-98 to 2001.02 Business Enterprise i I ISSUL: OvOse and employ strategies to include small as well as women and minurity o,sned businesses in the City's purchas+m,,Mrd process. II. GOAL: To increase small is well as women and minority owned businesses in the City's purchasing and bid process. k' MILLSTONES BY FISCAL YEAR SIRAILGILS 91.98 9899 99.00 W-01 01.02 kegutar atlrndancc and program Implcmcnl Ongoing Ongoing alt oing Ongoing railkiraul at the momdily meetings { sponsored by North Central fesas College Small Business Ehsdopment Center 2, hired FAX of "Notice to Sidder'i" for Implement Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing supply, service or construction projects to African-American and I lispanic { i • Chamber ofCommerce 3. lnrunnaldiscussion sessionAith Implement ongoing ongoing Onguing Ongoing leadership representatives of both organitatluns 4. Ihvrluped a N'dcume Prusprdise Implement Ongoing Ongoing ongoing Ongoing Sopplicv'Conlrador Brochure S. Assigned a specific individual to assist Implement CAtguing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing in hid document complelion while maintaining the confidentiality of the bid process i r Inkw Jiw I a x10 25 X~ 32 9 , 'aa~rara O . I l I Y, i CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-98 to 2001.02 Business Enlerprise I, ISSUE thvlse and employ strategies to include small as well as wunlen and minority owned businesses !n the City's purchasingbid process II. GOAL, To increase small as well as women and in nority owned businesses in do C'ily's purchasing and bid process, MILLS ONLS BY HSCAL YEAR - SIKAILGILS 91.98 98.99 99-00 00-01 0I-02 6, ('onlbine lu cncuurege small anJ Implement (41gu ng Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing minority participation In all legal nutiu•s ofprojecls fur bid 7 NI,ilnniln the vuchasing Ut'llce as a llnplevsent Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing central uilkv'loculion to disseminate bid inrurmalion and other lsenineol mfurtnation for any interested minority vendors 8 Support compliance with legislative Implement Onguing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing concoming Historically Undcrutilited Business (H U,B )is per tc%as Local Uuvernrneni Code Chapter 252, t i 9. Listing the bacMngof minorilq, Implement Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing I women ussned, )IUB and J disadvantages business enicrprise I ns a criteria In our evaluuliun of a new fnuuciA software system for the Purchasing function U U ndln~ do 2 ;r lip 1 f i i I ' I f i E t i 1 1 ~ ASSISTANT CITY } MANAGER-OPERATIONS * Fire i * Humoo Rewurm { 0 * Porky & Recreadoo 0 * Pouce 1 J14 32 X I O r i 0 O n t.mmt t y I I I "ity of Denton Workforce Analysis Mike Jez, Assistant City Manager Division By Race I DIVW00 Black Aslan Am.1. Hlspanle While Total Fire 1 (1%) 0 0 0 7799 116 Human Resources 2(20%) 0 0 3(30%) 5 (50%) 10 Parks & Recreation 6(10%) 0 2 (3%) 6(10%) 46 (7755) 60 Police 12 (8%) 0 2 (1%) 10(6%) 135(85%) 159 I s Whim Total 21(6%) 0 4(1*) 19(6%) 301(87%) Us Division By Gender/Age D[vWoo Female Male Over 40 Total Fire 8(7%) 108(93%) 69(39%) 116 Human Resources 8(80%) 2(20%) 2(20%) 10 60 Parks & Recreation 20(33%) 40(67%) 28(47%) Police 40(25%) 119(75%) 48(30%) 139 Dlv[s[on Total 76(11%) 269 (78%) 147(43%) 343 Eny,fgrrr dnln n.r u(bluy, 1998. lknn AiKr n<a lndudr ayrrin7 ugrrrmrn7, rran»mf, o~or frmpnrury rrry,7,~ru. DA d,m 10 32xI0 0 nawwrwe,a " O . r o City of Denton Workforce Analysis Fire Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief Race Abe Gadder American Black Asian Indian Hispanic white Over 40 Under 40 7`a'k l 96.' Female l 7 2 6 r 8 7% Male 168 67 41 ;.108 9395 TWO 1 I15 69 1? ' 116 j % 1 `A 9996 5996 41% , I { 4> I i Race Age Gender "10'k A~i~n Frttuk Il ~ I,M1 Ilupank 1f U7< d \I~ ~ I + Llmfn t0 Il1< ,.ii,', I II KI 1.01 4LLk 1 4 ~i~ ' [ I1~ 1`Y~`i 1,•{ a w x.4'1 +~.u+.] ~ 1 (her 40 1 Whitt Mtk 99% 971{ N 00 E~ryuluyre 41a at of May, im. Daa Jou Aa MrAde speck! ajree,*w%t erase wl, W* k#vmpy employeet. ISM ,aoss>nsa 0 arsroa - J I i CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-99 to 2001-02 i Fire I. ISSUE Devise and employ aggressive strategies to maintain and crease where necessary a diversified workfurce that retlcwts the demographics of qualified members of our commun~fy within each department or division while maintaining a raceand gender neutral hiring, selection andprumotion process, Il. GOAL: To improve there necessary or maintain employee svorkrorce makeup lesels that reflect the demographics of qualified memlxrs of theeummunity, while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion pruccss. SIRAIEGIES I. Dkvefup a Fenton Fire Department recruitment video in Fl' 1997198 (January I, 1998). 2. D?evclop a Denton Fire Department informational brochure to be used for marketing and recruitment in FY 199798 (January 1, 1998) I Develop and implement it Fire Explorer Program in EY 199899. i I 4 Continue to pursue nun-civil senicejub assignments io the Fire Department in support services and a nun-emergency EMS transfer business in FY i I 1999'99. S. Make every effort to talk to local communi,y groups to encourage minority participation in the February (1998) Fire Recruit 'lest by: Actively soliciting response from African American and Latino-based organizations at surrounding universities, especially UNT and I WU. l'alking to local minority Chambers of Commerce as wrll as service dubs with large number of minority members lalking to local minority churches and church groups. fre&% Y 1~' r x C~ 32 x I o o 0 ~i i , City of Denton Workforce Analysis Human Resources Paulette Owens-Holmes, Director Race Age `(3Nldlt.. American Black Asian Indian Hlapank White Over 40 Under 40 Female 2 1 S 2 6" Male 2 2 Total 2 3 S 2 % 20% 30% !0% 20% 80%"t I Race Age Gender Amrkee Indian Mien Nteck 0% 0% Orer40 malt a0% m% tU% s ba 111~~nka h i While Ulderb • 0do 1 30% Mk 00% 5 /'I EpF4gef dam ae q jay, 1M Dare deft 1101 OK'6de 4wdn1 @tr&wM, uduwAL Wlof 1twwrmy el11 k"tj. 32x C7 0 u M CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-98 to 2001-02 Haman Resources r I, ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive stwegies to maintain and create where necessary a diversified workforce that rvfIccts the demographics of qualifieJ members of our community within each department or division while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process II COAL: To improve where necessary or maintain employee workforce makeup at Icvels that re%ci the demographics of qualified members of the community, while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process. MILESTONES BY FISCAL YEAR SIRAI"GIKS 97.98 98.99 99-00 00-01 01-02 I. Continue aggressive recruiting program Continue Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain and send an IIR employee to scfieduled career fairs in the metroplar. 2 Lepand list of IIR recruiterstu include Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain . all IIR employees iulerested in attending by 01198 ntclroplex career fairs. 3, Evpand adserliscment of IIR positions Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain to include colleges, univcrsitiev, business Available schools, IIR associations, other cities. Incaliy•bascd mganirorlnns, local cable L ' access channel and the Internet. 4. Upgrade Internet websiteb)creating Funding Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain .a1 an on-line application 'resume page Request I~ ON " hr J~~c I w,, 7 x~ 32xI~ E, I ■ ter~raa . 0 i • it t I CITY OF DENTON Workforce DN ersity Strategic Plan 1997.98 to 2001-02 Human Resources t. ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive strategies that would maintain and crease where necessary diversity within empluyee-related activities, (ask forces and committees. 11. GOAL: To improve or maintain employee-related activity, [ask force and comminee representation at levels Ihat reflect the demographics of the cummonity. MILESTONES BY FISCAL YEAR MAT'EGIFS 9748 98.49 99-00 00-01 01-02 I, Improve where necessary and maintain Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Suslain diverse representation ofempio,ees Immedialcly on all IIR-supported committees, i e, T Ilabits, Workforce Diversity, etc, j M 2 Recommend and encourage selection I dement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain orqualified minority participants hr mcdia(ely • (employees and citizens) loother f committees, boards, task forces. I e, i LIC, Wellness, C,O D L' S , NC81, Civil Service Commission, DhfC. £nvironmenlal, employee picnic, etc I 3. Rotate participation of IIR employees Implement Sustain Suslain Sustain Sostain k • on all City committees, Immediatcly • 1 i a + I hr dr 2 - - - ?c x 32 O - I i 9 1 r I CITY OF DENTON Workrorce Dicersily Strategic Plan 1997.98 to 2001.02 Human Resources 1. ISSUE, Nvise and employ aggressive strategies to promote development and career advancement for all department emplo)ecs, li GOAL, To develop employees who are highly-competent and well-rounded human resources professionals. MiLLSIONLS BY HSCAi. YEAR SIRATL:GILS 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01.02 I L Create a clear career path for ill Develop Sustain Susiau.7 Sustain Sustain departnu:pipositions idcntir)ing By 09,98 lucical advancement and compelencies needed to advance to the next level. 2, Create a training and development Lkvelop Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain program/curriculum and goals specific By 0 98 Io each department position orjob family. 3. Encourage participation Of all Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain employees in department activities Immediately and decisions, 4. Create cross-training opportunities Complete Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain fur allemplo)eeswithin thedepartment . As Available 5, tltilitedevelopmentaltracking policy Complete Sustain Sit.tain Sustain Sustain • when possible, As Av a i lable I ~ 6 Increase communication within the lmpleinent Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain department and inform IIR employees Immediately about events and issues that Olio the entire urganitatiun. o~ w hr ax 3 75 f~ 32XI❑ x~:M o I City of Denton Workforce Analysis Parks & Recreation l Ed Hodney, Director 1 Race Age Gender American 1 L.,tt , 1 Black Asian ALan Hbpanic White Over 40 Under 40 'I'ota) 9i Female 1 19 10 10 ",x. '20' '33% Male S 2 6 27 is 22 '640 67% Total 6 2 6 46 29 32 60 1096 3% 10% 7796 47% 33% i Race Age Gender Amerkn Indion r ASI,n fl iepnnk Hemde 31% i 10% Over Wi:s,,•.j + C. Under 40 + ' . M~4 0 4 61% • ~ I I ''J' M'h ite I 77'4 I EmplWe Bala a of May, 1998 Gala darn wr IwWe epmW yrmneM, rearowel, and/or kwporary employe I CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1497-98 to 2001.02 PaAs A Recreation i I. ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive strategies to maintain and create where necessary a diversified workfurce that rellects the demographics of qualified members of our cummunity within each department or division while maintain ins a race and gender neutral hiring, sekc:fon and promotion process. 11. GOAL: To improve where necessary or maintain employee workfurce makeup levels that reflect the demographics of qualified members of thecommunity, while maintaining a race and gender r.eutral hiring, selection and promotion process. MILESTONES BY FISCAL YEAR ~ v SIRAIEGIES 97.91 98.99 9900 00.01 01.02 I, Estdblish an exhaustive list of agencies, Complete Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain schools, publications, and businesses that may be contacted to recruit qualife(i r :,torities for Park$R Rec,ealion positions. 2. Establish an inter-departmental Initiate Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain "employee swap" or cross-training i program to enhance career development and advancement uppuriunities for the Lit) %orkfurce FAN an' ~5xId 32XIO G t ~ f! ,'f r r'•" tq i s 9th 5 0 aansaof , - r t } i i t CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-9810 2001-02 Parks Br Recreation 1. ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive strategies tea would maintain and create when necessary diversity within employee-related activities, task forces and comminees. 11. GOAL: To improve or maintain employee-related activity', task force and committee representation at levels that reflect the demographks of the community. MILESTONES BY FISCAL YEAR STRAILOIES 91-98 98.99 99-00 00.01 01-02 I, Ensure minority representation Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Suslaill on al I major task forces and comminees composed of department employees. 'f . spy - c i ~ t i ' i I % } 1 'r~ / F ( l 4 I 1 4 a ' n 1 I 1 r . nra edr~ 1 l n r r i, CITY OF DENTON ity Strategic Plan Workforce Divers 1997-98 to 2001-02 Parks A Recreation 1. ISSUE: In order to continue to diversify the Parks & Recreation workforce at all levels, strategies are needed to ensure that in-house job candidates can compete effectively %ilh applicants from outside the organization, II. GOAL.: Expand career development and promotion opportunities within the Parks & Recreation Dcparvnent, MILLSTONES BY FISCAL YEAR STRATEGIES 97.98 98.99 99-0 00.01 01.02 I. Develop and implement a mentoring Initiate Continue & Continue & Continue & Continue & program that will improve the Assess Assess Assess Astrss opportunities for career development and advancement for PARR employees. Y:. i ^s ~Js ~w 32 25 0 A City of Denton Workforce Analysis PoBce* Mike Jez, Assistant City Manager Race Age s ~j,:.GOO(W A nerkan ),4 Black Asian Indian Hispanic White Over 40 Under 40 Female 7 2 31 _ 11 29 t=1'.',`, 33 Male 5 2 8 161 37 82 J 9 75,1i Total 12 2 10 135 49 Ill 196 696 SS96 3091 7096 sC"' e,; i,_,'~,;; • lnrludn C, ail Serdrr and Non-Civil Semite amVloyru. Race Age Gender Amrrkm Indian ILyrnw Arlan IR 6% o's Feerk 7111 . INn1 _ Ner 40 i j ~~~'~T! l~l M,+ti} dye, !,O urikf 7aS40- Mrk 75% welrc Ian S0 tMpluyer AV r as of Mar, 1998. Dura don eM 41rhlde eperlal arrtfoi it uoeal, end/d reaporary relployen, +3 ,,.4ve ,r, : Erg, ~I A 1, I k yn nuwwm - • J o . I t i CITY OF DFNTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997.9810 2001-02 Adice 1. ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive strategies to maintain and create where necessary a diversified workforce [hat rellcets the demographics of qualified members of our community within each depurtment or division while mamtaining it race and gender neutral hiring, selection and pn •"ion process. IL GOAL: To improve where necessary or maintain empluyee workforce makeup revels that reflect the demographics of qualified members of the community, while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process. MILESrONLS BY FISCAL YEAR 51RA11:GILS 91.98 98.99 99.00' 0X1-01 01.02 I. Identify, and participate in recruiting Sustain Sustain S stain Sustain Sustain- opportumlies that target qualified protected class individuals 2 Identify and utilize protected class Implemented Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain employees as recruiters, 01'96 A . 7. Mentor qualified civilian employees Suslain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain for sworn positions. 4. Consider diversity in transfer and Complete AS Sustain Sustain Suslain Sustain promotional decisions involving Available equaliy qualified candidates, 5. ProviJe in-service training opportunities Complete As Sustain Sustnin Sustain Sustain and encourage use urtuilion Available reimbursement fur professional develupmenf, p~.~liu dnc I ewe ".5 ' 3 rG xrl ` ~3.. 1:6f nl Wpb i1 , x 7'~ • aces.. , rarr~n f CITY OF DENTON Workforce Dit'erslty Strrtegic Plain 1997-98 to 2001.02 Police I, ISSUE Devise and employ aggressive strategies that would maintain and create where necessary diversity within employee-rclaled aclisities, task forces and committees. IL GOAL; To improve or maintain empluyee-reliled activity, task force and comriiltee representation at levels that reflect the demographics of the community. MILLSTONIS BY HSCAL YEAR SI'M LGIES 97.98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01.02 I Communicate activities to all entplusccs C'omplele As Sustain Sustain Suslain Sustain io rmure equal uppuriunity for all to Available participate. 2. Consider diversity when assigning Complcle As Sustain Sustain Sustain Suslain empluyces to employee-related Available • activities, task forces and committees. Pmphasize diversity in citizen Complete As Sustain Suilain Sustain Sustain participation in departmentactivitlas, Available such as the Citizen's Police Academy and the ]'raining Academy Advisory lWard, i 4 Provide opportunity for ill citizens to Complete As Sustain Sustain SUSWn Suslain participate in the cunsultation, Available adaptation and mobilization phases of 1 Con munlty Policing. 1 I O IxAne dkk = i'. 0 ss •nc. - h CITY OF DENTON Workrurce Diversity Slralegic Plan 1997.9890 2001-02 Police 1. ISSUE Devise and employ strategies to increase positive interactions, both mtemally and externally, through increased understanding of diversity issues and improvcJ interpersonal skills ll GOAL' To increase employee understanding of dlrersity issues and improve interpersonal skills. MILESTONES BY FISCAL YEAR { STRATLGILS 97-98 98.99 ".00 00-01 01.02 11I, 1. Evaluate interpersonal skills of applicants. Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain 2 Provide Covey training to all empluyecs, Complete As Complete As Completed Sustain Sustain Available vv.4able 08'99 3, Provide diversky training to all sworn Completed Complete Complete police officers every two years 0997 68199 08101 I 4. Provide diwsi y awareness, sensitivity, Complete As Complete As Comply As Complete As Complete As customer service sndcommunications Available Available Available Available Available i skills training to all : mploy ea. 5, Accept and investigate all inte,aal and iustain Sustain Sustain Sustain sustain 1 ealernal complaints regarding diws:ly and sensitivity issues • j 6, Reinforce appropriate bchaviur of ' ustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain 1I employca through positive recugniti,m and negative discipline. J r p uve arc 3 2.) 132 x 10 e .r • 1 ~ 1 1 t , I i • ASSISTANT C: i Y t MANAGER-UTILITIES ' * Utuidea , S a * Water Utultlea * sous wale • • • * Electrk VtWUes . SOON= s 0 'A719'.FA I i i 1 City of Denton Workforce Analysis Howard Martin, Assistant City Manager Division By Race Division Black Avian Amrt. Hispanic White Total Utilities" 6(10%) 0 0 4(6%) 52(94%) 62 Water Utilities 1(2%) 0 0 3(6%) 49(92%) 53 Solid Waste 3(9%) 0 2 (4%) 15(27%). 34(60%) 56 Electric Utilities 6(4%) 0 0 4 (3%) 12G (93%) 136 Divislon ToW 18 (6%) 0 2(1%) M (B%) 261(83%) 307 Division By Gender/Age Division Female Male Over 40 Total Utilities* 7 (11 5509%) 26 (42%) 62 Water Utilities 10(19%) 43(81%) 24 (45%) 53 Solid Waste 5(9%) 51(91%) 30 (54%) 56 Electric Utilities 23 (17%) 113(83%) (38%) 136 - i, Division Toter 45(13%) 262(85*)] 132(4.1%) *7 14 'lnrhkirwOdiNrsAdminiwulrnnand ifeel drnhrr, Enplm re data as e J bfay, 1998, Dula drre and indudc viper ia( ogreenrrna, seasonal, and'rv rnryarary rmpkneer. MO die ~ n 32XIO 0 r o 4 i i City of Denton Workforce Analysis Utilities* Howard Martin, Assistant City Manager Race A Cendef American r < < r• Black Asian Indian Hilt ttic White Over 40 Under 40 9i Female 3 4 1 6 % .y i'' 119i Male _ 3 4 48 2s 30 ' ~a•,'!! 90% Tidal 6 4 82 26 36 `r'` '6? _ 10%6 696 84% 42% 6896 + lnrludrs UriI,lirs/Elarrrr Adminislrarim, Solid Wave, and flat Sentres d4ijions. Race Age Gender Ana rkan Indus tlia~ani Asian U% e% Femtk 1 Bx 'A II% • H IA, k u% Over 40 ij R+ p% , t r a• under w z i Fy ss+~ i N5. sex t~ a' ' • a • what n4 x Mail rvx J J Employer dala m of May, 1998 Me dots no iswWr speew arrrrnlrnr, seasonal, and/or trnywrary rnployets I ~~,,,TI ~.+K ♦ ~I R ~1...1 n Pk..J 32 ■j♦■ C Y1[ i'^ ":H.!r eel , ,J~ r l , ryI City of Denton Workforce Analysis Water Utilities* JW Jordan, Director Race A .Gender American Lp I I, Black Asian Indian His nk White Over 40 Uoder 40 ';fiolal : % Female 10 6 3 16 19% Male 1 3 39 18 23 43 ' .61% Total 1 3 49 24 29 % 2% 696 9396 4396 5396 ' a Im hide. Wafer Adminislralion, Wafer Distribution, Wafer Meter A Repair, Water Engineering, Wastewater Collection, Wasteknfer F.'ngin rem q and Drainage Al virions. r Race Age Gender lli,panc AlM'f kYll A~ IrY11~n ~ F'emak U% 19{ A~iYn ~ 25 "vefb Q% II'i 2 ~ Undill 40 J yr,r, While ` 92% Male ! H lit J EnsMvyer Baia as oJ.Nay. J998 fbfa Ars nil In, belle rperrial aA rerment. redinnal, alkI k IYrporary rnwloyeer. yip Musa" 0 .XW City of Denton Workforce Analysis Solid Waste Charlie Watkins, Director Race A American Slack Asian Indian Hispanic Wbite Over 40 Under 40 a Female 1 4 3 2 Male 4 2 is 30 27 1A ?G "W~:'; 3 1~J1 Total s 2 is 34 30 26 % 996 496 2796 60% 5496 4696 Race Age Gender Amrkrn Atna lnlnn Femrk oil \ r% 1l ifpanic 9% nlq, Y 4%efdrd Under40 5 } 46% Over 40 N~ '~d` d,~*r1 341{ Y y, .11R 1"'M1,r M'"~1P. i i ' f While * . 60% Mrs 911< a fnyofnyer data a.r of May, 1998. Wile doer *a fndrfr WId apfratrN, se LVO , and/a kovorary 0,Woyra. p OY RN IF, `l: aattraaress 0 t i CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversify Strategic Plan 1997-98 to 2001-02 Ufilifies' 1. ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive -vwegies ti maintain and create where necessary a diveniried wurkro a that rcllrcts the demographics cf qualified members of our community w ithin each department or division while met aining a race and gender neutral hiring, sele,tion and promotion process, ' t{ II. GOAL: 7o improve where n r.essary or maintain employee workforce makeup levels that reflect the demographics of qualified members or the community, white maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process, MIUSIONES BY FISCAL YEAR ST RAILGItS 9798 98-99 99-00 00-01 01.02 1 Advertiseaobs in minority publications Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain and media outlets. Available 2 Produce a newslener or marketing implement Revise As Revise As Revise As Revise As n brochureesplainitgjoboppurtwities Needed Needed Necdcd Needed ] and benefits for students. 3. Postjob notices in minority churches C'ompkte As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain and with other minority based Available organizations. 4 Partner with other departments and Request Monitor Revise As Revise As develop a recruiting program targeting Funding Needed Needed DISD high school students S, kewrite job ads ans applications for Implement Revise As Revise As Revise As Revise As better :ecessibility of all people, inclining forms in Spanish, ~larur, Kind and ib alrgiea fw l?rlrnri AJmirt6rrutiac Astler, ll,rne 71eer %'rrr,ea anJ fnafr,mnienhd 4', trtrei i uid AR i III I II Kea ? < szxio • o t' , r , ' 1 - t 1 4 CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan S 1997-98 to 2001-02 i bilidej 1, ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive strategics to maintain and create where necessary a diversified workforce Iliat reflects the demographics of cloahfed membeo of our community within each departmenl or division white maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process. It. GOAL: To improve where necessary or maintain employee workforce makeup levels that reflect the demographics of qualified members of the community, wh's maintaininga race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process. 1 -J MILESTONES BY FISCAL YEAR SIRAILGIES 97.98 98.99 W00 00-01 01.02 6 Ilave actual workers in a jub category Implement Revise As Revise As Revise As Revise As complctejobadsrdemriptions. Needed Needed Needed Needed y ti 7. Send department representatives to Implement Revise As Revise As Revise As Revive As ^ career fairs to whom the potential Needed Needed Needed Needed f w applicants can relate. C! y. 1 4 •Gaur, Krwf and s rwrKlri f t I ahair AJmrrrIj tn,flwr, N Lrer. &Ad Wass, f frrr Servu er and Envirunmrrurd N-n'lers wd Juc 2 {~I i ti;r t'~,. vfi,'°~trE:7x,~ i I O r t . I r CITY OF DENTON 3 Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan ; 1997.98 to 2001-02 ' Utilities" 1. ISSUE: Devise and employ aggressive strategies that would maintain and create where necessary diversity within City activities, task forces, committees, boards and c omm issiomi. If GOAL: To impruve or maintain City activity!task .`orce,'cummiitee/board/commission representational levels that rcnctt the demographics of the community. MILFSTONES BY FISCAL YEAR STRATEGIES 97.98 99.99 99.00 00.01 01.02 insure that all hiring committees reflect Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain the demographics of the community. P # 1 2 Organize a departmental diversity Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain committee that works with the Director to oversee iMplernCrildtiOn Of [he department's diversity goals and strategies it a J Ursne, gwrl and slra'eglrs/or I'Ithtier ,fdminlalydlran. R:' ,ofd Wade, thurl SrvvrorI artd Loft irogntenln -twm'Ices mil.fiR D t 41tr+~^~*"}~rrjl.t ~r.e' ' 7:J •Y,' ~ fi ~ Ii!A'!1 'J 3 L ~ ~f u 1 i Jr11I1N} t 1 1 CITY OF DENTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1991-98 to 2001.02 (4ilifies a I ISSUE, Lic0se and employ effectise strategies to reduce emplu)ce turnover and encourage the advancement and grux Ih ul'emplu)ees from all demographic groups represented in our community. 11 COAL U provide a xurkplace atmosphere That encourages the retention and gruxrh ur ernplo)ees, bul particularly of those %bu have been historically underreprescnled in the wurkplace. MILLSTONLS BY FISCAL YEAR SIRAII[61FS 91-98 98.99 99-UO 00-01 01.02 pruv ide an a Ffect N c, expedient training program that encourages emplu)ces to impruve Ibcir skills and team new Things. 1. Develop a xay to track emplo)ee's oevelop Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain • groxth in skills, I 2. NO cle a vpecifc time fortdking Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain C!)L tests and certification courses and tests J. Fnsute that all crew leaden arc providing Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain' their employees equal opportunity and I • tune for training • i 4. Re-evaluate the time p rind allox%H Re-evaluate Rcsisa As Revise As Revisit As Revise As for obtaining a CUL. Needed Needed Needed Needed •hrnv, gnat and ru aligns/ur l'IrL7rej Ad"i in jrrat on, Il o1vr, SufrJ ll'derr, ✓•frr7.5irwi rr and f:nri~unrnrnrgLknb ri I will aoc 4 MAN s u r CITY OF DENTON H'orkforce Uisersity Strtategle Plan 1997.98 to 2001-02 i [1Eilia'let I, ISSUE', Devise and ernpluy effective strategies to reduce cmpiosce lumuver and encourage the advancement and growth of employees from all demographic groups represented in our community. IL GOAL To provide it workplace atmosphere that encourages the retention and growth of employees, but particularly of those who has : been hislurically underrepresented in the workplace. MILLSIONLS BY FISCAL YEAR ST KA'ILGILS 97.98 98-99 99.00 00.01 01.02 ' Molisate and encourage the ectise participation of ernployecs in departmental activities and decisions. L Study a'pay' for skills acquired" policy. Request Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain • Funding 2. Identify ways to encourage and sulicil Implunenl Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain employee opinions and suggestions, 1 Kestructure the empluyee recognition Res Ise Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain , program to enhance its meaningfulness • to employees and management. t 1 Oo ~ Ivor, good and s raieg . a for L Tldirl Adni aslrarion, Water, Staid n usir f Irri Srn'ii n and E'nvironmenwl.kvvlres r Will W, ,g S x Q 32 X c..rse<as 0 b I t I t CITY OF DENTON Workforce D ersity Slralegie Plan 1997.98 to 2001.02 tltilitlet * 1. ISSUE.', Devise and employ effective strategies to reduce employee turnover and encourage the advancement and gruwth of employees from all demographic groups represenred in our community. 11 GOAL, To provide a workplace annosphere that encourages the retention and growth ufempluyees, but particularly of those who have been historically underrepresented in the workplace. MILESTONES BY FISCAL YEAR ST RAIEGILS 97-98 98.99 99-00 00-01 01-02 [mpruve communication I. 1 ncuuragc dialogue between foreman Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain and employees stn it one-on-one basis. M 2, Study ways to facilitate hiring employees Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain whose English is marginal by cunenl ~ standards Conduct communication training for Sustain Cuuduet Sustain Sustain Sustain depanmcni. Follow Up v 4. Dcvelopleadership programfurcrew Ikvclop Inlplcment Sustain Sastain Sustain leaders and managers, 1- Conduct diversity training on a division basis 1. Begin training by division. Implement Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Ossue.gifa7 unJalrulrgirrJrrrf tlllflej,dJnunlalrulim?Nbler,Solid J1'We,F'fvrr,R'roler and E'nvlra nmoo'd Serwre N uul Aw 6 25 x 10 32x~L7 e 0 1 i City of Denton Workforce Analysis Electric Utilities* Sharon Mays, Director Race All* Odder American ~ralkye , Black Asian Indian HL a White Over 40 Under 40 ~ Female 2 l8 9 14.''x:'' 1796 Stale 4 4 too 43 70 tiiN ~'!83 Total 6 4 126 51 84.) r' % 496 396 9396 3896 6296 * herhldes Eleatic Adminlatrarian, Eleatic Production, Utilities DiValch, Eleatic Distribution, Eleatic Substations, Eleatic Englneeriog, Herlrir Afelering, Eleatic Meter Reading, Eleatic Customer Service and Eleatic Communlrorfont divisions, Race Age Gender American Indian Mnn Ilx Hispanic ux \ 71l Female e bled l7 SL ~ x tree w 5+ salt ; r r~~n~ ~tan!~~ ' Uridgi 40 WhNe 93% Mak t)!f w Empluyet data as o/Alay, 199g, Data awe nM lnrlaale spreiai agreenvrN, reatonaf, ad/w lrrgoorary ea~olayeet, 32 X ~.fairrar u. e 4 loom" 0 r i10MRS CITY OF DFNTON Workforce Diversity Strategic Plan 1997-9810 2001-02 E7ecfrtc Utilities I. ISSUF'.: Doke and employ aggressive strategies to maintain and create where necessary a JiversilieJ workforce that rellccts the demographics of qualified members of our community w ithin each department or division while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process II. GOAL: To improve where necessary or maintain employee workforce makeup levels that reflect the demographics of qualified members of the community, while maintaining a race and gender neutral hiring, selection and promotion process. MILESTONES BY FISCAL YEAR S1RAILGIES 97.98 9899 99.00 00-01 01.02 1. Create CroundsmanIClassificaiiun. C'omplcte Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain By 06.'70;98 2 Advertise pusi6ons in minoriq-targeted Complete As Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain f publications. Available O 1 With lluman Resources assistance, Meet with IIR Complete As Complete As Complete As Complete As participate more aggressively in by 01/)0'98 Needed Needed Needed Needed recruitment activities with minority o(ganizations, high schools and vocational schools. V I d. Increase presentation opportunities Identify by Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain I for minority groups, 031) 198; Notify by 07x)0'98 tae J.r 1 r 10 A, ti CITY OF DFNTON Workforce Di%ersity Strategic Plan 1997-98 to 2001.02 Electric Utilities L ISSUE: Deselop training, processes and procedures which support the creation of a culture of trust, cooperation and Ieamwurk. 11 GOAL Create a culture in which people of all backgrounds can rea.h their maximum potential j MILLSTONUS BY i ISCAL YEAR SIRATEGIL'S 97.98 98.99 99.00 00.01 01.02 1l I Insulve effected employees in decision Ongoing Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain { making process 2 I'roside training and coaching in elfective (hi•guing Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain communication and Ieamwuk i h ' 3, Meet annually w ith all department Complete Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain t employees lu discuss their sicws and by 01/1098 solicit input on issues which need to be addressed. 4. Establish a minority task force to monitor Complete Meet Meet Meet Meet progress and coordinate minority 13) 02%131198; Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly , recruitment efforts. Mcct Quarterly etc, 4K 2 p ~ ❑ 25 x ❑ 32X a lWil 0 1 i i ~ r i r^ r I 1 'PI m ' I APPENDIX • ,i Ilk ~o V. 32x tX'~w ' x l O I \ 1 i . i . 1 City of Denton Workforce Analysis By Job Family I Job 8amily Slack Ada Am.t. Hispahk White Over 40 TOW i Executives 2 1 5 6 8 Females Executives Males 1 14 IS lS 1(9%) 2(9%), 19(82% ? 19 (8291) 13 Job Family Birk Adan Am.l. Hispanic Whhe Over 40 TOW Management/Supervisory Females 2 15 9 17 SlanagementlSupenIsory 3 2 S 62 31 75 Males SO) 2 (2%) 10 (11%) 77 (84%) 40 (43%) *0 92 Job Family Black Aden AMA. Rpank Whit Over 40 1t'olal Professional S 3S IS 43 Females Professional l 1 3 36 IS 41 Males 6 (1%) 1(1%) 3 (4%) 74 (88%) 33 (39%) • 1 ~ on ~ nnea„~ sn , ,.`a sr 25 32XIO I Mr 0 our" a MOM } City of Denton Workforce Analysis By Job Family Job Fully ~.!j: Black Asian Am.l. Hispanic While Over 40 Total Technical/ Professional 21 1 57 20 r79 Females Technical/ Professional 8 1 20 132 57 161 Males 29(12%) 1(1%) 21{8%) l89{79%) 77(32%) ' M Job Fundy Black Aslan Am.t. IHispank White Over 40 TOW OfficelClerical 7 1 6 100 63 114 Females OfficclClerical 2 2 10 5 14 Males 9(7%) 1(5%)r.s~a x 8(6% 110(86%) 68(33%)r 12$ Job F"y Black Asian Am.L Hiapank, White Over 40 Total ServicelMaintenana _ t 1 5 1 7 Females Service/Maintenance Males 13 1 21 79 53 114 14(12%) °"'~`~'~~`s a~" ! (1%) 22 (1816) b4 6996) 14(45%) 121 S J14- 10 .2 .5 32X r i s , { O . 1 City of Denton Workforce Analysis By Job Family Job >trmlly G' Il!"&' A'dw Aosl.l. Over 40 { .Total , Police I 6 1 7 Females Police ` 2 7 95 35 106 Males 2(2%) (6%) 101(119ki 36(32%) ,9Wi 113 30%) ' Job hw Slick Ado *m.l. bpmle, ' 1Vkkr' ` Over 40 Fire Females Fire 103 65 103 Males 63 (63%)'', lid pppp I 'O MA Jnc ;r 5 S IN, 15).0,I❑ t, 32X I0 s o ' l s City of Denton Workforce Analysis { Positions By Job Family City Manager's Office Job Family Poshkro Black Alan Am.[. hispanic White Over 40 Told Executives Citv_Manager I 1 I Slates Deputy City Manager 1 _ I 1 Total r i i 2 2 Job Family Position Black Asian Am.[, Hispanic White Over 40 Total Professional Auditor 1 3 females Assistant to CM i 1 1 3 1 1 City Secretary Management Asst. If - t 1 Professional Public Info. Officer 1 I I Males - - Total S 3ts.r' S "Job Family Poskion Black Ado Am.l. Hispanic White Over 40 'Cold TechnicaL, Professional Executive Secretary Females Total O Ui.f aoc 32X I Cl A ~ Iris ai19a~ a i - O ' r City of Denton Workforce Analysis # Positions By Job Family City Manager's Office .t robe r A:Poe&ion f& Eg! Beek AsUu Over 40 •TOW ti OfficelClerical Senior Secretary 1 I 1 Females Clerk III I I I i~ T r aX*i d4 .":dif di #7n CC1 `~C~vS~~' +~~,„9 t 2 t M1i~RV .+1`. n p`i "d g~if ti oeQfar♦h1lRI; t'OW i( I r;r d 1) ' p rNYs d(K 1„r ,1,♦'~i rl 2' • S 2.5 K K10 y pn} •r: er 1'.,, 32 . _ x~❑ 0 OUR" 0 I " i City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family City Attorney's Office Job Family Position Black Asian AMI Hhpank %Me Over 40 Total Executives City Attorney 1 1 - I Males - - Total 1 I l Job Family Position Black Asian Am,L Hispanic Whhe Over 40 Tot SfanagemenlrSupervisory First Assl. City Attorney 1 I l dales ,'vv3 Total t„ i I r, 1 _Job Family Position Black Asian Am.l. Hispanic White Over 40 Tot Professional Asst. City Attorney II l ~1 Females Professional Litigation Attorney- Alales Asst, City Attorney M 1 I Assn City Attorney I l 1 I Total i 3 1 4 Job Family Position Black Ada Am.l. Hispanic Whhe Over 40 TOW f TechnicalTroressional Legal Asst. I Females ToW r r, r• v.,yr a r,r r { p p l sr sa az' 1 r~ Ui~! di,c 7~~ y 32 x, y • tit r' Z ~ L t. 0 } IT~r ~ I • ~ 1 J r ' f f City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family C' Attome 's Office r + f T i J" JQ- rv 1 i-. t';, r0. F"'ynR H1LW l 1: 1 ?ut~a' yob t~mtly;,~ ' doxat t.p► r: c".':t Over 40 Officelclerkal Administrative secretary 1 1 1 Females Senior Secretary 1 l ~q V f rie$/Hetlnt y'olal ; t ~ + j ~ r 57i $ft~~ rr r ,a t \0 1 w r r . 0 i, a - J, a i 1 r City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Municipal Judge i.r.`I ~!~.A 0 ti... OVlT IO ~-.Executives Municipal Judge 1 l 1 Males rOta1 4~' F 4sa fit ; 14"*." t" r" P~ S l' l ~ ugly 20 ...!.y{". YOI!1 ply a•ki~'A`iq AaV~U..; .e!i gi.'.A11 i .ey,,,y a.:~ ;rt S'; •,a ~,;i i Over 40 01 Technical/Proksslonal Muni. Court Coordinator 1 l 1 Femalcs 4, 1 2 nn~ak J." r aIL 3.' , 25 x Ib 32X 0 0 o 0 City of Denton WorkL rce Analysis Positions By Job Family Engineering and Transportation JobFamQy Pam h~ Black A&u Am.l. Hispanic' WNle Over 40 Total Executives Director 1 l 1 Slates Total A.f^j I -jWi ' , Job Fanslly Paeldoa Black Aden Am.l. Hbpa k Wbhe over 40 ToWI Management/Supervisory Supervisor J 2 3 2 5 Males Total ;`,alF4 t 11-6 '01 i it 2 AJ; ' 3 2 S Job Family Poeidoo ` Black Adaa Am.I. Hfepa» is : Wtstte Over 40 Told Professional Transportation Coord. I t Females - f Ptofessionai Engineer Associate _ _ t t vales Engineer Administrator 1 I U nn s a~ ~1 32 X o ,ate City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Engineering and Transportation as !ob Family v -sa Pbdtlon Black Alan Am.L pYnfc; Wlttl~ Over 40 "Fnlal rechnical/Professional Tech It _ l 1 Females Planning Tech II _ 1 1 Te.hnical/Profess lonal Tech I I 1 1 2 Mates Tech 11 2 8 6 10 I f I Planning Tech It Survey Tech f 1 I Traffic Signs Tech 2 1 2 - Tech Apprentice l 1 l { ~*nw, r;~~~a, Me;c~ j ~~~rerar~xl ~'q*a;'11 t1 813.19 Job Family < Fodden °c Black AAmu Am.I. Hliepude . W6ka Over 40 Total M Office/Clerical Clerk I 1 1 1 Females 1 1 1 i ~ Administrative Secretary 4V Total S x, 1S' !S 144 i iP! l4 Ct^' m 7Ji L kRF~N 7$ 1 Yanst i t 2 ~ f I INr r dnc 10 32 X I O 0 4 , ate. t • City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Engineering and Transportation uti,`~ ~a Job FU* V-4'6a Pail* I" ; AWq Md.L ~ ~ Over 40 Service/Maintenance Transportation Manager 1 1 Males Maintenance Worker I 1 1 2 2 4 Maintenance Worker 11 2 2 4 2 8 Equipment Operator 1 4 4 S ToW t xa+~,a s vainer^~s t': qm . wac~a:c' '1: 8 1t< 'r "TOW NO a,c 1 r a:. 25 X 32do rmaw~n 0 M i City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Facilities Management j Job Family Position Black Arun Am.l. Hispank Whke Over 40 Total ! Executives Director t i 1 Males Total Job Family Position Buck _ Allan Am.l. Hispenk White Over 40 Total Management/Supervisory Supervisor t I I Males Total 1 Job Family Poeklon Black AsM Am.l. Hfepat k White Over 40 'total Professional Administrative Assistant I 1 I Females Total 1 1 whrIAP':1 Job Family Position Black Aeon Am.l. Hispaak Whke Over 40 Total Technical/Professional Technician 1 S 1 6 Males r .;s Total 1 L:T S'q.9 b ' Y d m DA Jcc 32 x I EI r iii - - I f r City of Denton Workforce Analysis E Positions By Job Family Facilities Management ~~yy;,yy~~yy p~ Wmp as.tT~~ Job Famtl~; 1'odtkn BI1ck ~ =r'"rKmt~ e t~ Over 40 i I ! Office/Clerical Secretary Females ++76 "L. 'Irow i4`o'dYV. ' b?$o?9MI, `^Urwk :W,'-i~:75".Yn Job Family _ Posift W*& Mlao Am.l. Over 40 Service/Maintenance Custodian 1 I 1 Males IV, TOW beyffit ant Total 6 Mir"£ 10 I I ` 01%1 Ax I; + ~ri~'~~ zr1 x 10 32 x I o s O o . City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Planning and Development Job Family Peaitiaa Black Allan Am.I. Hispanic White Over 40 Total Executives Director l l 1 Males - Total Job Family Position Black Asian Am.I, Hispanic White Over 40 Total ManagementlSupenisory CD Administrator I I 1 Females Housing Specialist l l 1 Program Specialist I 1 I ]lousing Assistant i l 1 Management/Supervisory Assistant Director _ I I _ I Males Building Official I I Assist. Building Official_ I 1 _ 1 Human Services Coord. I I Job Famlly Position Black Ad" Am.I. Hispanic White Over 40 Total Professional Planner I I I Females Planner 11 t _ _ 1 Planner 111 2 i 2 Professional Planner 1 2 _ 2 1 Males Planner III l `.:~+P:~AYa~ 6 t;+~Fr 2s 32X 101011111 s Mae= 0 City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Planning and Development Job Farally Paddw Block Alan Am,I. Hispanic White Over 40 Total TechnicallProfes0onal Sr. Planning Tech I 1 Females Executive Secretary I 1 1 Health Inspector 2 2 Code Officer _ 1 1 Plans Examiner I 1 I 1 Technical/Professional GIS Engineer 1 I I Males Health Inspector _ y 1 1 Code Officer 2 2 2 Inspcctor11 _ 3 3 3 CD Inspector I 1 Job Famlly Posldoa Black Alan Am.l. Hlrp" White Over 40 ToW Office/Clerical Secretary 3 2 _ 3 1 Females Clerk III 3 _ 1 3 Senior Secretary I Tolal ..,Nu Wkl; 6 3 rf~t~s 1 Dep irtmew Tdal 3 r 4~a a~~ f~ r°r;r h •7,~ Z " 1 ~ ~ 31 17 ~ I o i niO doc I 32x10 aaaxnn 0 e i City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Finance Job Family Position Black Asian Am,l. Hispanic White Over 40 Told Executives Assistant City Manager I 1 _ 1 Females Total l I nr~~;" 1 Job Famlly Position Black Asian Am.l. Hispanic White Over 40 Total ManagementiSupervisory Purchasing Agent t 1 1 Stales Warehouse Supervisor I I I Told 2 2 2 Job Family Position Black Asian Am.l. Hlspank White Over 40 Total Professional Senior Buyer I I I Females e Total r; ire` r..e 'dC 1 I . eat I Job Fam11y Position -Black Asian Am.l. Hispanic White Over 40 Total Technical/Professional Executive Secretary I I Stales - 77- in~''Y e Total O IJ I li. l d.x 32 SUMMON O } i i I i i J r City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Ruance I t t' JoS fFamz , 3rd poe~tloa i'a 91aek Aden' Am 1.', N'tike : Over 40 CoW Office/Clerical Secretary t I t Females Senior Secretary i t 8; 'a`air'.Se! Total JjO!Krb: 3t~i^Af.~'! , ~~Y1i dl,iw , ?/-Vg Sn"_"'. Ip,R~~I ?.;.r9 t 't r,~ rN Podtlba I xrt w Slack Aden'. e " Over 40 'oW lob »wmOY 'KV Service/Maintenance Courier l 1 1 J !tales Warehouse Attendant l l 2 Warehouse Lead l 1 1 1 Total rtsa kwcv'~ rx~6~r~+w~' 45y" ;3+7!t,.Z 2Ir+ parlafenl7oul J 1 1 I I w ,man" o I I ~ f City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Je b Family Management and Budget Job Family Position Black Asian Am.l. Hbpaele White Over 40 Total Executives Assistant Director _ 1 I Females Executives Director _ I _ I Males Total a + r 19-'p'I:HA Z Job Family Position Black Asian Amd. Hbpanic Whla Over 40 ToW ManagentewISupervIsory Foreman _ J I I Females - 1 TDB Job Family Position . Black Asian Ant1. Hispank While Over 40 _ Total Professional Financial Analyst 1 _ i Females Managem.nl Assistant li 1 1 Accountant I _4 I I Accountant II Grants Accountant Utility Accountant t 1 TOW~ F 01 %1 dog y 10 32XIEJ O If ~ t City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Management and Budget 1 JobFsn* Poddoa c iM;sa Block AA ft Am.1. mbl-wk Wblle,'; Over4O TqW Technical/Professional Payroll Tech I I Females Accoundng Tech _ I I I Sr, Utility Clerk 2 2 VVA.0 Total Ir:s,<; c rqa: sj:x~ ?is~CS!scvv t aar tr: t 3; I ,.'y a~ Job PuWy POW011 Black ' Aldan Ant 1,"`,` . EWp1n(c' over 40 's llod 1 I l Office/Clerical Administrative Secretay Females Accounts Payable Clerk Accounts Payable 11 _ 4 _ 4 Accounting Clerk 11 l1 I TJ_, :r!imWi41 iDri!tS;rh A(~}?+li''~ l 2 1 ~ y. Dlparfrolllt'COtal... ~~gv'~r' 1 ' ~ l ~`>~:~!+~pt~+'k# ,'~~§a~2 r, ~ e' 4 , { 1 + nf*S QM 32xio gain& 1 i i 1 t City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Fiscal Operations 7' Job F& ly :1 Poddoo „ black Aden Am.l. Attpank WWt• ` Over 40 ToW Proresslonal Management Assistant 11 1 I remales !P yr Tow ?iPlc ^ni r~:.Si 1~ :''1 !'3aa aR1'4t Y.,13'4'~a'i~ i1o-.4;:. p ; • 7rd Job F"y P081don Back Adm Am.l. l a"okk Wbko r Over 40 TOW TechnicatiProfessiona! Accounting Clerk II I 1 I Females Occupational Nith. Nurse I i I Assistant Court Rep. 3 2 1 6 Court Rep. 2 1 2 3 ~Ow- Job Fmdy PotWoa Blrck Adrm Am.l Fl4pmlc /NhW Over 40 j• Office/Clerical Cashier I 4 2 4 Females Cashier It I l I Receptionist 1 1 2 Senior Secretary I I Customer Rep. I I I. a 12 • Senior Rep. 2 1 3 3 • Clerk I 1 I I c r ..t sa row staz: ao t .t dxar A 2 )'AW t9 13 r"A V I - 25 32 10 1 i i i City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family i i Fiscal Operations ' Over 40 to6 FMI 'r et~w' `err ,Y A+ 4 Service/Maintenance Sm. Collection Analyst 1 I Females '~a R'F '4+a!q!'Wy ~ i,;"R^'4 'WrsmY~~(,!W ~•4'y~7t?~" wNM57': iy~:~7. t - r s Y r t F ' 101 32 10 p t 1 City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Information Services w Job Family s: Position ' :r € Black Aram Am.l. Ubpnk Whhe over 40 Total Executives Director I M ales ~j "a:eT P, A" AM irk .tCjb LS f£ l a1~ l rN"J F ToW Job Family Poddon Black Ado Ath 1. H#pok Wbka Over 40 Tool Managemem/Supervisory Manager 3 3 3 Females ManagemendSupervlsory Manager Malcs Job Famgy Poaiittoo Black Ado Atn.L Fibpak WhH4 Over 40 fow Proressional Programmer 1 1 1 Females Trainer i i Proressional Programmer 2 2 2 Males Help Desk 3 1 3 l •ai. T_`-' ,9 .*~»c ..:o°t 1: ~...r.x'"1:"'Yi .rd'irm' .Y ■ ~Y~ l~. ~Y i J14 V 0 UN disc ?5 K 10 32xI El y:~ l al~lw y. t r r , 5 r. 1 ' City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Injornnadon Services M,4 Job Fad wif' , ~rY *4' Poahloto' afl~el[ X11 : p 1,. Over 40 ' Office/Clerical Admin. ServLes Staff 1 1 4 4 6 I Females Am" TOW 'tY IVN r"w 1 4 1fl~etitlllNrOtd ~arx~`. i,'I r16 13 7.t, I,f#r V { VII, kY z 5 x I o 32 x 1 O i . r City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Library Services f Job Family Patkkn Nuk Atkm Am.l. Hkpoik %%ko Over 40 Totnt Executives Director l 1 l Females Total ` W-iTIVI.f " Job Family x~''` nd Podtion • Black Atlas lan.l. Hlepook WLIa Over 40 ToW ' Manage mentl5upervisory Library Manager _ I 1 Females Branch Manager l 1 Tai Job FwWy ` Podtloa " Black Atlas Am.L Hitpeak White Over 40 Total Professional System Administrator t I I y Females Librarian 6 4 b a Professional Librarian 2 _ 2 Males rra~R re l 9 S C rZw r ~i tl N*I dox _ { Io 32XIO • ID rear. f r ' City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Library Services rim dobNujV: 4 ,Vr%x "poddoa 'VA'r 7 it" MIW Alq. 1t~ptolt 1Vhltri t. Over 40 Office/Clerical LibraryAssistant 111 1 _ 1 Females Clerk 11 3 l 3 f Clerk 1 7 4 7 Library Assistant 11 4 1 4 Library Assistant I I I 1 AdmInistraNve Secretary I I 1 Office/Clerical Library Assistant ill 2 1 2 Males Clerk It 2 2 2 Clerk I 1 1 _ 4 2 6 Library Assistant I 1 _ I h i - v ~!1 abMfi 1," k,w 5 3 Wb r~,r twti , fSi~ el + Y~ ~k yL. 13 t 9" Tow i 1 1 CIA i UPI aM i 25.Io 32 x~d i OEM" r 0 i - i City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Economic Development Job Family Podd= "t` C Mack Aebm Am.l. Mpaak Whhe Over 40 ToW Executives Director Females ^i. ' Total Job Family Poddon Black Asia Am.I. Hbpank While Over 40 Total Management/Supervisory Airport Manager 1 I Males t Tolal Job FmfJy Position " Black Aden Am3. ttbpank White Over 40 Fold Professional Financial Anafyst r I 1 Females Development officer _ I 1 • Eco`Dev. Coordinator I 1 I promotion Spedafist I ~ _ l 1 Main Street Coordinator I 1 row 1 t ;r>J Ir iitA4.ia3 I:! I ~ jo, V t~ 0h s doe - 7r, , Ia szXl • pr Y r f, t r r Y y r r City of Denton Workforce Analysis F Positions By Job Family Economic Development k u,w,a~ W Cis.. rtu na 8)Adk I►dori M0.I1 VI over 40 Job N Poddoa 13bp.de 1 l TechnicallPrefessional Executive Secretary Females Technical/Professional Maintenance 11 1 ! t Males srx aria T" ~an~w Y rrk tx t~~ b, s. Fyn ;`se±.Y~J. i•G :~crMr 1 x,1 Job Frmll~ `s xt , 'Poeltbo,' B1oc1t Aadut ` AmYt. , It1Yple W tii; Over 40 lfioW OfflceXlerical Secretary 2 1 2 Females Fv~sr4i" TaW ''atiE.wL3 ;r;':fi3a paiCha~ tKa3 @& 3k4+er ] +i' 7T -'"1 ar DlNt?Ot TOW tn.~+s~rata>vrie f0 4 77751 1. 2 ~f niYtdlw I 2. 10, 32X 1 0 i i City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Fire Job Faintly Pmum r ' ,a Black Atlao AM.1. Flbpank VAd o' Over 40 tow Executives Fire Chief 1 1 1 Males 4 Total Mj~n elf x .'_S. +~N 4t1 :~y"g t 'd" Kt9Si 1 r" JobFamlly Posidon Black Asian Am,1. IWpoalcWhke ` Over 40 TOW` Management/Supervisory Fire Marshal 1 1 Males Protection Engineer 1 1 Taal a41 6^ Z 5 2 Job Family Paldon Black A" AM.14 11tapttink. Vfts Over 40 Total Fire Deputy Chief l _ l I Males Battalion Chlef 4 4 4 Captains 20 18 20 Drivers 31 24 31 Firefighters v _ 47 1S 47 r,,, ToW stitax° »rxawYtyt4 dttwat.trtr wa7+;,103 6S ..;r:10$ I V Q nn! ac x./ ~3 2x~~ Mai 0. i 1 J I I O ` :ate 1 1 City of Denton Workforce Analysis i Positions By Job Family 1 Rre Blrtck _ Wponlt W~IEe' ; Over 40 1'opt~. Job Fw* r4" tty Tccbnic&I/Professional Communication Officer 1 4 1 S Females Public Educator I l Technical/Professional Fire Inspector I 1 l Males Investigator _ l l ; c:= Jab Family ax:. uasaafi+ ati BIACk g1k Over 10 1 too l _ 1 officeXlerlcal Administrative Secretary Females Secretary 1 1 1 r?~y Tolal..a-~arrra_kt asastr t`" ~rfa5r tai;." I ,•,ar„~sty' r" Depvtmenl'MoW ! ao-a 'j x.r rz cs ucfi ,>i~,r~ Qe~cy lid X59 -~Al .x, Il6 i ~ I Ir d 4 a.v. ~ 0 0 s • I City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Human Resources i Job Family POSWOo Black Adw Ain.]. Hk+panle White Over 40 Tottal Executives Director 1 1 1 Females f~ l Job Family = Poaitim Black Add Am.I. Hispank' White Over 40 ToW Professional Generalist 1 l Females Management Assistant U 1 l Assistant Director 1 l Professional Generalist 1 l Males - TOW 'x' `-r€. r r's!x%3 °HtiM'~_~$ ti. y~eFi~'. ~fb%i7 l' Y,~ ;.hi-.'~ ev(T'i[ii'' Job Faintly ftskloe Black Ado Amt. HMpwk_ WIM Over 40 Total l 1 7echnical!Profrssional Benefits ---Spec iali st Females FI n.t +!a fir TOlAI `f R rr I , rl~ 32xIo y i ?Y 4 0 V ry + f~ r r ~ Q I' 4 rRVAf101a ' r it r~ 7 1 r 5 I { r A ~ ~1 'ter • `Y~ • Ili r' " W r i r f S 1 •r tfe r ~ ~ a r -II 1T , City of Denton Workforce Analysis ' ? Positions By Job Family . Human Resources h'I A l Over 40 t ~'f,• i'4T Y~ V A' 7 1~ N " ~ Office/Clerical HR Representative 1 l l Females Receptionist I ` I Administrative Secretary I I Office/Clerical HR Representative 1 1 Males r: 41; Nil :..r +Q~I-1~ ~.Yu!!~xZ 4:7,{~l~S~ '~.fy~'1 ~Lar a: -v`'14TfLe 4 Z y Y I I, Y V V 9 rhVsdM r; 10 r 3G x i o i ^ . . 1111 ~ 1 City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Parks and Recreation J,* Fa.* a " paekloa Iduk Asia eld;l., 111* 1k 1~ldfe Over 40 ToW Executives Director 1 l 1 ` Males y y yt ¢ kry y p ` Job PAOLO ` • a Fre i Paddy z~ Asa alftk 'JW AM.I. t4p )C' {y*' ? Over 40 Told ManagementlSupcmisory Superintendent 1 1 Females Managers 2 1 2 Supervisors 4 3 4 Management/Suj':rvisory Superintendent 1 I 1 Males Supervisors l 1 1 3 3 6 Equipment Operator 1 9 7 10 Maintenance Worker 1 l 2 4 4 7 • Y.~ki1~Y"' 5'y!Y➢ u't'RV] M~nM.M1S9.!' i~ll4''/IP I '~}qi~y~, 14JAN9!l':•, 19 Tow 4 .31.. • M a doc }:4 25 v,10 32Xlca aa~ , to at ' City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Parks and Recreation Job Fttt»ily P"oa ":'a: Blaclk Asdttn Am.l. Bfeptsnic Nhhe Over 40 ToW Professional Park Planner 1 I Females Horticulturist t t I Marketing Specialist _ I l 1 Recreation Specialist It 2 2 2 Recreation Specialist I 3 1 3 Professional Recreation Specialist I 1 I 3 1 5 Males ToW 1 1 6 13 Job Ftsmlly Pceitloo 131"k ` AaLu Am.l. 1Y6ke OveI'TiW -44 Technical/Professional Recreation Leader 1 1 Females TechnicaVProfessional Crew Leaders 4 i Males Recreation Leader 1 2 T013) 2 qs", -,-0 1 ' 1 1 i .o Div do. 25 x~ 32X~❑ c i •I e 0 I 4 ,1, I. >a t , r k 1 City of Denton VV r, Irkforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Parks and Recreation Over 40 Office/Clerical Administrative secretary l I I Females Secretary 1 _ l Clerk III I I Office/Clerical Clerk I l t Males i TOfAr Dep~rtmertTote! w 6 raa~l` ~'Z F ~~2a~! 16 28 ^ty1S0 i t , • r N O NO drs w o ' AMR= i 1 I i City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Police I Job Family*s poaitbet Black Aelan Am.T. Hlspank Wbhe Over 40 Total Executives Assist. City Manager I I I Males Assist. Police Chief I 1 l Total 2 Z 2 y Job Fwnlly Position "r Black Aalan Am.[. Hispank Wbke Over 40 ToW Police Captain I 1 Females Police officers I S 1 6 Police Captain I I 1 Males Lieutenant 1 7 _ 6 8 Sergeant 1 10 6 11 Police Officers I 1 7 77 22 86 'T'otal a~ 3 ry. „Raa~;r~3~Z si~x~.~7 tFs~t'101 36 X113 Job Faintly Paeitioa Black Alan Am Htipanic Whhe Over 40 Professional Family Coordinator 1 I Males Total i r a e,, -ti i i~ Uk~ 5 da 1 Y~ ,r ~ t 32xI❑ 0 WACO } g r • F City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job F.mily Police Job Family Position BLc4 Aden Am.l. Hispanic Mite Over 40 Total Technical/Professional Administrative Secretary 1 I Females Records Secretary I I Clerk 111 _ l I Animal Control 2 1 2 Public Safety Dispatcher 2 1 10 2 13 Jailers 2 2- Duty Officers 2 2 1 4 Property Tech I I I Technical/Professional Animal Control _ S 3 Males Public Safety Dispatcher l 1 Jailers 3 3 TOW 8 I .yt S 34 Job Family Podtion Black Asian AMI Htrps* WMN Over 40 Total Office/Clerical Records rechniclan S 3 S Females Secretary 2 2 2 Total 7 S 7 I i~ I~ IM s dd% I I F, 32X nil ~ r Rwsns 0 , j ` ruie~ ' r f ` r: r .I• City of Denton Workforce Analysis f Positions By Job Family Police 04, r. #3 H#j4: J~n(R X S' r~+ r .ajt%~P f 'r74~p V4 r,:..# 6 ~;1 # h ,'1 Over 40 v r. P v~. r ur' x *.c 4 ko.. ,k. ServiceJMaintenance Parking Officer I 1 2 Females y~47k- aOw w~ 7h$Sgfr f ~~f~iE~& ~i>Pyi~f :r~k #lM^t.! `'[rr r , 014 o > W DO d(K y, 75 10 32x0 ~P4,al ti. K r Neu= . C t City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Utilities i Job Family s Position Black Asian Am.b Hispanic Wbke Over 40 Tmal Executives Assistant City Manager I I I Wei - Total,, te; d$ v a., 1 I~,r* rtr 1 Job Family Poskion Black Asian Am.l. Hkpank Wbke Over 40 Total Management/Supervisory Manager 1 3 2 4 Males Tola! i . • a' 1 s: ; 2 w _r, + 4 Job Family Position Black Asian Am.L Hbpank Withe Over 40 Total Professional Ltility Projects Coord I I Females Professional Financial Administrator I l 1 Males Tact f „ s.u,; Z i?< 2 Job Family Position Black Asian Am.l. Hispanic Whke Over 40 Total • "echnicaVProfessfonal Executive Secretary 2 2 • Females Technical/Professional Crew Leader 1 12 1 13 Males Sr, Engineering Aide _ 3 1 3 lam r N 0 ~I i i I ;~rrarrr 0 i I City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Utilities i M ;O Job Finally Padtkn Black Awn , Am.l. Hispo k White Over 40 ToW OfflcelClerical Senior Secretary I 1 Females Clerk I 1 TOW I Job Faros Position Black Asian Am.l. Hispank WWW Over 40 ToW. Service/Maintenance Maintenance Worker II l l Females Tech 11 I 1 1 Service lMaintenance Equipment Operator 2 A S 10 Males Maintenance Worker 1 2 2 Maintenance Worker II 2 _ 6 4 B Meter Mechanics 1 3 3 4 Maintenance Worker 2 1 2 0 Chief Mechanic 3 3 3 Maintenance Mechanic 1 3 -2 3 Foreman l I I ToW 3 1 r.v 30 20 :sz~:as 33 Deparfineot Total 6 4 0, S2 26 "'77' 62 f r~ - ~~,~IGa 32XIO 77 7 s , 0 s ,nw City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Water Utilities Job Fam{iy r w Poehioa Black Adea AM.l. Hispack White Over 40 Total Executives Director I I 1 Females Total ~ v "c •,a 4F , s, a,'s `;~1'k: 1 I w~,.:~ I - i - i Job Family " Podtioa Black Ad" Am.l. Hispanic Whke Over 40 TOW j btanagementlSupervlsory Emir. Services Manager I _ I li Males Foreman_ 1 I { Supervisor 1 2 2 3 Production Manager 1 I I i Total ..;uk ...!7 k4ad.,:-A -°fFwi.S+t^. 3 6 Job Famll POetdon " Black Arlan Am.t. " y H9padc, Whke , Over 40 ~ TolOl . , ! Professional Lab Supervisor 1 I I J Females Management Assistant I l l 1 " Professional Envir. Servlce Coord. I l it I Males - ~ TOW 2 rt":.`y { r ~I u P + I Ik.1 dux 1 r t 2> 10 32XID 1 0 amaroa i I a ~ I i i I - I I City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family j Water Utilities i I ~ Job family 1-14 ae 4-111r-' poritioa xb+. ~'a Btack JAsIm, Ana., ; Hielaok VV* Over 40 Iotal Technical/Professional Electrician l l l Females Technical Assistant I l Lab Techs. 2 1 2 Lab A_ ist ant I I Technical/Professional Plant Operator 1 1 1 2 2 Males Plant Operator 11 1 ~4 S S I Maintenance Mechanic 1 - I 1 Maintenance Tech, 11 1 1 4 Lead Electrician I I Chemist _ 1 _ l Lab Assistant I l PCA Officer I 1 I ♦ Inspector l t Environmental Tech. I I Electric/NW Technician 2 1 2 Tech. If 6 3 6 Crew Leader 2 2 2 ♦ Welder I I Tech. 1 3 1 3 Apprentice - 2 2 ! Tech. Ill y I I Total '~iM'Xi i,va ~4d tom'-~''` i " l6 f{ '~7 t4 .4 lI r114t dk ~ ' x 10 32XIO D s % a . i, c { di)Yas City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Water Utilities k f .mu)r). tn?.iiA' a'~lTdzNt.8r4~i1~}1 Job Fmk podNoo ti'" Ado Am.t.`` Hbpmit.: Over 40 ; ,1r Office/Clerical Clerk III 2 2 2 Fes-,-Iies 'r's yd' M .1GYt~.Y'.Y'¢ S ,+:'xT''3 3 y fy-,i r~+], y Se 1' J~► i 'Z 2 1 r1'K-~ 2 w5m n:tii Tow 1 A +S'f I l K poskku Black Ado' Aui.f. myawk, Wblite ` Over 40 'riolyd ServicclMaintenance Hea y Equip. Operator 3 3 Males Maintenance Worker I l l rc lP`~Y7' TOW ~a lp w!4H I1t}~ :i F1?'.~s }7Si°t :.M~CIsN14.r v( aqi.4F 4 a: Depart. M'[ohl ' t s ar l 24 S f !3,' ' } r, t ` • • JJAI i D.smx ~5' as 32 !o 6 , O emra,n I City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Solid Waste Job Family - Position Black Asian Am.l. Hispank While Over 40 TOW Executives Director I 1 l Males - Total Job Family Position Black Asian Am 1. _ Hispank White Over 40 TOW Mat;agement/Supervisory Supervise.! 1 _ I I Males Manager 2 I 2 Total l a,,. ,u s 2 2 ;ti i as n 3 Job Faintly Poshloo Black AAia Ato.l. Hispanic While. Over 40 Total Professional Admin. Services Coord. 1 I Males Recycling Coordinator I 1 l • - Total 2 1 ata, 2 _ Job Family Position Black Asian Amt. Hispank Wbile Over 40 Total Techniul/Professional Scrvice Representative I E E Females Technical/Professional Crew leader 2 2 2 4 Males Maintenance Mechanic 1 1 Told d 't` FJ 3 J 3 ~r-ax~i 6 1 r~ I nn s a,~ I 0 Manor c , IN amn 1 ' I o r City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Solid Waste Job Famlly F0,5100n ` Black Aaiao Am.i. Mpank Whke Over 40 TOW I 1 1 OfflcelClerical Admin. Secretary Females Clerk III 1 1 I Secretary 1 l 1 Cashier yy 1 I I T 4 Job FarnEly Poekion Bieck Alen Am.]. Hkpauk Whhe Over 40 Told Service/Maintenance Commercial Driver 1 4 8 8 0 Males Maintenance Worker 1 3 4 S 6 12 Maintenance Worker 11 1 3 1 4 Residential Driver 4 3 3 7 Equipment Operator 3 1 3 1 Inspector I 1 1 ToW + a~r 4 ~~.*.rn~.f t =~sa 1 "FvF". 12 a ati 23 201, i 40 ;,vrJ,tc 1Aiti;'k'2 13 AtR:"IG{~ 30 • Yfa1 JV • 0 Di. s aK J M y 32XIO : O E s ' !aacena t City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Electric Utilities Job Fmgy ~g Ga' p rte B&wk A~iin" . t din lI. IIY Over 40 ~.'~atall Executives Director Electric Utilities 1 I I Females Total <r,;a'4' :;zYs"aN0 ~4~ttwsi x~.N I s: Job !»amtly 1POwt{oe Buck Ache "j" Oulli, HY . r VYbke Over 40 ToW ManagemeL-HSupervisory Electric Prod. Manager 1 l l iy Males Foreman 12 5 12 Supervisor Electric 1 I I Superintendent 2 2 2 Communications Mgr. 1 I I Marketing Specialist I 1 Commercial Marketing I 1 Tow 10 Did mk KIO 2X 0 City of Denton Workforce Analysis I Positions By Job Family Electric Utilities job Fame9 r,~rr si r posttloafsly Mk AtlW Adt l.' 040~ ° Over 40 W,:i s;x4W. Professional Special Projects I { Females Public Information I _ l l Utility Project Coord, I I Utility Rate Administrator _ l I { Professional Results Supervisor I I I Males Engineer Associates I I Utilities Svc. Admin. I 1 Management Asst. 11 1 1 Training/Safety Coord. I I Computer Analyst l 1 Operations Manager 1 _ 1 ' I i. w fJ 25 K10 32 X I a • o it 1 City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Electric Utilities Job Fart* Pod dw ffiKk Ado Atm.l, Hbpuk 1~hlfa Over 40 -tow Technical/Professional Multi-Media Specialist l 1 Females Tech. It 2 l _2 Line Tech _ I 1 Electric Apprentice _ l t v 1 Executive Secretary 1 1 Technical/Professional Tech 1 4 l 4 Males Opus, Maint, Trainer 3 1 3 Tech. Apprentice 7 7 Tech 11 _ 1 S 3 _9 Tech Assistant _ S 1 _ I Production Ops 11 6 3 6 Production Operator S 1 _ 5 Lead Tech i 11 7 11 Journey Tech 15 10 15 Line Tech_ l 2 2 1 5 Electrician 5 1 5 Electric Apprentice 2 2 • Senior Engineer 1 l • - - TdW : r v,; ;a9s:. s t'xM N G' :gY S rQ^ id~J15 j a'r7a~5 3113~1~i . 86 Uid Jx t 25 ~0 32XIO s 5 I ' I i City of Denton Workforce Analysis Positions By Job Family Electric Utilities Job Family Poaitlon Black Adal' Am.l. Hbpauk White over 40 Total Office/Clerical Secretary 4 _ 1 4 Females Utility Dispatcher _ 3 3 3 Admin. Secretary ' 1 I Senior Secretary 1 I Offce,'Clerical Utility Dispatcher I I Males Secretary I I Total 11 4 11 Job Family portion Black Adao Am.L Hkpank WbIte Over 40 'total TScrvice Maintenance Utility Service _ I I Females Meter Reader I I Chief Meter Reader 1 1 Service/Maintenance Lead Tree Trimmer I I _ I Males Tree Trimmer I _ I Utility Service 2 _ 2 Meter Reader 1 6 2 7 Tata1 1.'; ra/Gt. k~Xfm'i§,C'3'~k 1 it't x.;'•'lZ 3 ±+`sfJ 14 Departs eol Total 52 " 136 F~ ~~y,10 32XID 0 r o i•' X11 a i,. t _ i'u?:. re "h'N'N.IY W,), x,nrr M.. a rn... he.., I AGENDA INFORMATION SIIFFT Atrenda No .,1Q•'a.2.Z AGENDA DATE: June 9, 1998 AQenaa Item S _ Date UEPANTM1iENT: Finance CM/UCM ACM: Kathy DuBose, Assistant Cily Manager of Finance + SUBJECT' Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give starf direction regarding the 1998-2003 Capital Improvement Program as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. BACKCROUND In yout City Council back-up material, under a separate cover, please rind the Proposed General Fund and Utilily 1998.2003 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Ciiy Charter requires that the , proposed C1P, as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission, be presented by the City Manager at least 90 days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. I Year 1998-99 of the Proposed 1998.2003 C'IP represents the last year of the five-year CIP approved by voters in 1996. You may recall that the 1997.98 Operating Budget included funding to complete the five-year C•IP approved by voters in 1996 one year early. Each year City Council adopts the first year only of the five-year CIP. 'the Genera) Fund CIP includes tite proposal for capital projects for the five years following the 1998.99 year. Ibis is only a proposal at this time. It is anticipated that the City Council will appoint another citizen committee to prepare the next bond program within the year. the proposed CIP as submitted will serve as a guide to facilitate the process, (In May 24. 1998 the Planning and Zoning Commission, after holding two separate public hearings, recommended the City Council approve the 1998-2003 CIP as proposed. I PRIOR ACTION/RFVIFNV (Council, Hoards, Commissions) Not applicable. F;i C'~1L INFORM Al1Ul~ ` Mc • Nat apprcablc. EXIIIH FS (If applicable) 1998.2003 Proposed Capital Improvement Program. spcctfuily sub fitted: CV. Fortune ' Director of enagement and Budget i i i I c 25A 32X~a s mamma t , I _t { 1 :a 11 l!' I ' . f I .f I I k ! 1 I 4 i I. i I i I I I ! I. I CITY OF DENTON PROPOSED { CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM e 19984003 t rl Arm- Its 32x10 I I I MAW" I I I , i 1998-2003 f CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Table of Contents General Government Capital Budgeting Calendar .................................................................1 1998.1999 Project Summary .......................................................................3 1999.2000 Project Summary .......................................................................4 2000.2001 Project Summary .......................................................................5 2001.2002 Project Summary .......................................................................6 f 2002.2003 Project Summary .......................................................................7 ~ 2003-2004 Project Summary Other Projects Submitted >A • Other Projects Submitted Summary 9 + Utilities Electric ....................................................................................................13 Water ...20 • ~f Wastewater ..............................................................................................27 Solid Waste ..............................................................................................34 Fleet Services ...........................................................................................41 i ~ , i I I I i f ! I 1 i' I I i I i t! I I I! 1 l i T i 10 32 x RQM" . I l:-i { :i I _a I .:.7 t I I { I_ i I I I I I f I I ! l 3 t I' i ~ i i I i i 1998.99 BUDGET CALENDAR (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) February 10 Tues Discussion of Budget Priority Questionnaire with City Council Council briefing on budget process (Operating and CIP) l February 11 Wed Priority Questionnaire distributed to City Council February 17 Tues City Council returns Budget Priority Questionnaire February 24 Tuas Review and discussion of Budget Priority Questionnaire results with City Council. March 11 Wed Planning and Zoning Commission briefing on CIP process. March 24 Tues Budget Kickoff March 25 Wed Planning and Zoning Commission and Public Utilities Board hold a joint public hearing to receive input regarding capital projects May 13 Wed Presentation of Capital Improvement Program to Planning and Zoning Commission (General Government and Utility) ii j May 27 Wed Plannil ig and Zoning Commission holds a public hearing to i j receive input on the 1998-2003 Capital Improvement Program. June 10 Wed Planning and Zoning Commission considers a recommendation to City Council regarding the Capital Improvement Program. ~r June 16 Tues Capital Improvement Program presented to City Council September 8 Tues City Council adopts Capital Improvement Program budget (First year of Capital Improvement Program) t I• 25 i Q 32X10 0 , , o CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1998 - 2003 In 1995, the City Council oppoin led a Blue Ribbon Committee, comprised of fifty citizens, to review the capital needs of the cify of Denton and to prepare a live-yearplan for a bond program. After long hours end diligent work, the Blue Ribbon Committee developed a plan which was presented to the citizens of Denton for their approval in February f 996. The election results rellected overwhelming support for th! five-year bonJ program as proposed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. The 1998-2003 Capita Improvement Program ICIPf represents the City's five-year plan for development, The Capital Improvement Program is reviewed each year to reflect changing priorities and provides a framework for identifying capital requirements, Impact of capilel projects on j operating budgets, scheduling, end coordinating related projects. The proposed CIP includes a sixth year for the year 200304. This year was included to provide a complete five year plan following the completion of the 1998.9., program, which Is the final year of bond authorization from the last bond election. The Capital Improvement Program has two primary components. first is the General Government CIP, which represents projects that are nom utility relater' such as streets, drainage, parks, airport, and General Government facilities. Typically, these projects will be funded via general obligation bonds, certificate of obligation bonds, or other financing methods. Second is the Utility CIA, which represents projects that benefit the i:ily', enterprise funds such as the Electric, Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, and Fleet Service departments. Typically, these projects will be. fu•,dad vie revenue bonds or other methods. The Capitai Impfoverient Program budgeting process begin each a }oint public hearing held by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Public Utilities BOerd to solicit input from the community, In addition to the public hearing, the City Council completes a budget priority questionnaire, The public hearing, the results of the budget priority questionnaire, and the criteria *jelovr all serve as the basis for staff to prepare CIP requests. I . 1. Public safety, health and life; 2. Service demands; 3. Legal rvqulrements, liability or mandate; 4. Quality and reliabilityol current service level; S. Economic growth and development; 6. Recreational, cultural, and aesthetic value; and . 7. Funding ability; i ' 8 Operating budgets. Once tuests are prepared, the General Government requests are presents l to the Cit., Manager, and Utility requests are presented to the Public Utilities Soa•i for review. The City Manager's and Public Utility Board's recommendations are then ►ant to the Planning and Zoning Commission. After a seco.id public hearing, the Planning and Zuning Commission mak,4 their recommendation for a five-year CIP to the City Council for rhm ai provaf. Trt: proposed 1998 d003Capitel Improvement Plan is wmmarized in the foliowing pages. i 2 It 1 10 32 X w. h - 0 , ersreara p I I I I I I f I I i ! I f I ( ! I I I f I F t. I I 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENEPAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL (ME;so REQUIRED AID TOTAL OPERAT. PROJECT E%IB11N0 AUTH. UNAUTM. OTHER CITY W PROJECT AND YI.AR DIVAEPT NUMBL•R PAOJECTNAME 60N08 UNISSUED UNISSUED FUNOINO CONST. C091t hIAINT. I 9E-99 'Drainage 081019 Cod Street Drainage 480,000 460,000 480,000 W-99 Drainage 081036 Cooper Creek Channel PH II 600,000 00, D00 600,000 9E-99 Drainage 081061 Dallas Or Ye Drainage 60,000 80,000 80,000 96-99 Drainage 0810620 Misc Drain Capital Improve PH IV 125,000 125,000 125,000 96.99 Drainage 081XIE Misc Drain Capital Improve PH V 250,000 250,000 250,000 96.99 Drainage 081069 Pace DriveDrtinage 400,000 400,000 400,000 96.99 Drainage 081081 South Lake Retention Pond 260,000 260,000 260,000 98-99 Drainage 081082 CarrolllH.ickory Culvert Improve 118,000 116,000 116,000 ,899 Parks 006301D Upgrade Existing Parks PH IV 700,000 700,000 700,000 4,000 - 96 39 Parks 000305B Ati Futilities Renov 8 Dev PH B 500,000 500,000 500,000 9899 Perks 006308 South Lakes Park PH II Development 650,000 650,000 650,000 53,000 9899 Parks 006315 UnrversdyDrive Landscaping 249,070 249,000 244,000 496,000 98 rig f° arks 006325 Athletic Fields Additions IL Improve 600,000 600,000 600,000 i1 111 t'a,IS OUG326 Fuf,,re Indoor Recreation Facility 500,000 $00,000 500,000 x~ Uo63z7 Park/libraryExpansnn 600,000 600,000 6001000 100.000 e s 0010106 Wdlcwwood Pay 6 Drain (Oplion Iq 875,000 675,000 675.000 r 1'uns 0010116 South Ruddeli Street Sidewalk 88,000 86,000 88,000 96 9v Trans 0010132 MayhdULocp 286 Connector Road 745,000 7:5,0()0 745,000 9899 Trans 0010136 Roselawn Pay Benard to Cemetery 250,000 250,000 250,000 98-99 Trans 001013B Ateual Turn Lents PH II 287,000 287,000 287,000 9849 Trans 0010142 Jim Crystal BrOges 200,000 200,000 200,000 • 98-99 Trans 00101489 Loop 286 (1.35) to Teasley 250,000 250,000 250,000 98.99 Trans 001015C SidewalkslBikeways PH Ill 142,000 142,000 142,000 98.99 Trans 0010118 Trallic Signals PH II 325,000 325,000 325,000 9B-:19 Trans 001022D Street Construction PH IV 450.000 450,000 450,000 9869 Trans 001022E StreetConstru0ion PH V 379,000 379,000 379,000 96419 Trans 001022E Street Construction PH V 240,000 240,000 240,000 98-99 Trans 001083 Riney Road Paving 140,000 140,000 140,000 9899 Trans 001097 Mills Rd From Mayhill to Ryan Entrance 300,000 300,000 150,000 450,000 GRANO TOTAL 249,000 10,532.000 0 0 10,781,000 399,000 11,180,000 157,000 'urciudr~cr!JKNrf dcAhyelwn r.rtrl GNMiu va yikN hind ieWwcn 3 1 2ixlCl 12 xID R .r . edaar 1 i 0 j 1 i l Y 1998.200 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OENERALOOVERNMENT TOTAL IMEMOy REQUIRED AID TOTAL OPERAT. PROJECT EXISTINO AUTH. UNAUTH. OTHER CITY tle PROJECT AND YEAR OIVIOEPT NUMBER PROJECT NAME BONDS UNISSUED UNISSUED FUNDBIO COSTT. COSTS _ MAINZ 1999-2000 Parks 6330A Desgruconstrucl Phase 101 Ne Civic Center Po ilk Master Plan 350.000 350,000 350A00 19994000 Building 000203 Future Building Nerd 526000 525,000 525,000 19992000 Trans 0010.150A Loop 258 Spur-Pnase I 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1999.2000 Drainage 1610-79 Wstarsined P4nw0r4inage Master Plans 1,200000 1,2W D00 1,200,000 0 0 3,775,000 0 3,775A00 0 3,775,000 0 •'a i i i r , Jr ti P: hrMieu~uiMM~lodryrYUn Mw earn rk pMVeera nwuw ` r r 711.A9Ce1 IIII 1 l r I I i 1 I 17 1 :1 I":1 I .i I .l 4 l l l l i I I I 1 l I I I I I I I I, 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT _ TOTAL (MEMO) REQUIRED AID TOTAL OPERAT. PROJECT EXISTING AUTH. UNAUTK OTHER CITY IN PROJECT AND YEAR DIVIOEPT NUMBER PROJECTNAME BOND! UNISSUED UNISSUED FUNDING CONTT, COSTS M"T. 200001 Pars 63306 Continue designlconstructicn Phase I of Civic Center Perk Master Plan 100,000 400000 100.000 2000-01 Building 000201 Future Building Need 600,000 600.000 600,000 2000-01 Trans 0010.15Cd Loop 266 Spur- Phase 11 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,700.000 200001 Drainage 061037 Pecan Creek Near Robertson (Utility Payback) 191,000 191,000 191,000 2000-01 Damage 061036 Coorer Creek Detention Pond-Cortstructran b lend Purchase-Phase I I225,000 1,225,000 1,226.000 0 0 4,116,000 0 1.118.000 0 4, 11E,000 - 0 r I ~ ) j 1 ~ vifda~ roun.r d uwprMn, Urd tuna rrd p WNd Mw m S i ~h t`~ 25 K I o 32x1 0 s O h r • • r 1 f 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT k TOTAL (MEMO) f! REWIRED AID TOTAL OPERAT. PROJECT EXISTING AUTN. UNAUTH. OTHER CITY IN PROJECT AND 09T9 MAINZ YEAR DIVIDEPT NUMBER PROJECT NAY.E BONDS UNISSUED UNISSUED FUNDING CONST, 0 2001.02 Parks 63300 Cunhnvo der gt9construct,on Phase I of Cnk Cancer Pad Mosier Plan 62500 625,000 625 000 2001-02 Buddinp 000205 Future Swidin, Need 300,000 300,000 300,000 2001-02 Trans 0010.90 Modung4wrl LShn COnneClwn 200,000 200,000 200,000 2001-02 Trans 001O109 Mockingbird Lane ~Mnpo Ill AUdral 190,000 190000 790,000 I+I 200102 Trans 0010.159 9tual Rd A Treft Ogmsl an FM 426 750.000 750,000 750,000 I 2001.02 Drainage 0610-92 MayhiO Brk3ge-Pocan Creek 650,000 650,000 654000 2001,02 Dranage 061069 Pace OralnogaPhass II 60D,000 600,000 604000 2001,02 Dralnago 061065 Mulkey Drainage (Wha Oe. ,c rdMVY) 340,000 340.000 340,000 0 0 4,455,000 0 1,455,000 0 4,455000 0 i p 1 I~ r i~ . r 1 •waa~uMu•nau9ewnnoseww"raorraMan, u $ 6 r I I I I I I I f' ~ I ! I ( s,;l I ( I I I i I 1! 1 I c I r, ~ 1 10 25 32 10 I + ( i Y i ~ ~ I I I ~ I I I I l_1 I :'t I~ I.1 t J I I I I i( 1 1 I ~ 3 ~ S ~ 19982003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL OOVERNMENT TOTAL (MEMO( REOUIREO AID TOTAL OPERAT. PROJECT E%1STINO RUTH. UNAUTH. OTHER CITY IN PROJECT AND YEAR DIVIDEPT NUMBER PROJECT NAME BONDS UNISSUED UNISSUED FUNDING CONST. COSTS MAINT, 2002-03 Parks 6330D Complete despNconstrudwn Phase I of Clvlc Center Park Master Plan 725,000 725,000 725,000 2002-03 Parka 6334A CommundyParkAcquisition 125,000 125,000 125.000 2D02-03 Building 000208 Future SuMmg Need 400,000 400,000 400,000 2002-03 Trans 0010449 Interchanges Loop 288 (Stuart end Kings Row)•Lsnd 550,000 550,000 $50.000 2002-03 Trans 0010151 IH35E Mill to US 77 900,000 900,000 900,000 2002-03 Trans 0010SS West Windsor (Bonnie Brae to Hinkle) 484,000 454,000 484,000 2002.03 Drainage 061039 Cooper Creek Construction. Phase H 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2002-03 Drainage 061V5A Peon Creek Drainage 550000 550,000 550,000 2002-03 Uri + . It 0810-620 Miscellaneous Drainage 200,000 200,000 200,000 0 0 4,934,DD0 0 4,934,D00 0 4,934,000 0 ~y A 1 ,I 9L 'YcAdn nnRwrrr d oErpdian W wiea *d ge ws w rvw s 7 ;~p{I ~rk~i ,l 2a ! 32 x LML uetanw r 4998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL (MEMO) REQUIRED AID TOTAL OPERAT. PROJECT EXISTING AUTH. UNAUIH. OTHER CRY IN PROJECT AND [YEAR ONJDEPT NUMBER PROJECT NAME BONDS UNISSUED UNISSUED FUNDINO COSTT. COSTS MAINZ 200301 Parks 63348 Commun4y Park Acquisition 175,000 375 000 375,000 2003.04 Parke 8335 New Parke and Greenbetl Derelopmenl 575,000 575.000 575,000 2D03-04 Building 000207 Future 60dirlg Need 425,000 425,000 425,000 2003-04 Trans 0010-73 West Airporl Freeway (Loop 268 West) 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 2003.04 Trans 001015(0) Miscellaneous Sidewalk 200,000 200,000 200,000 2003-04 Trans 001022 (F) Mrscellaneous Streets 450,000 450.000 450,000 2003-04 Trans 001017 (D) Traffic Spnals 300,000 300.000 300,000 2003.04 Drainage 0810.75C Pecan Creek Drainage 2,000,000 2,000.000 2,000,000 2003-D4 D ainage 0810-62 (H) Mrscellarcnus Ore nage 260,000 260,000 260,000 0 0 5,585,000 0 6585,000 0 5,585,000 0 I =1 'I (i r ti', I I ,i , i 1 jv I 'rcMarvrrcrtsr AoElyrt+n Mk OMnG aW erw~ErWnwr wr 8 I! ~ ~ I ~ I! I I l I } 11 I )i;eY e`; '.1 i I R I I I I i I 1 I • ~t',y)rr1, y Q/~ 4 2 32 x 0 1rpA0Pl[r , 0 I I l I i E I? 1 3 I I I+ I t I i! I Il 1 I l ~ I I 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL (MEMO) REQUIRED A10 TOTAL OPERAT. PROJECT EAISTINO AUTH. UNAUTH. OTHER CITY IN PROJECT AND YEAR OIVIDEPT NUMBER PROJECT NAME BONDS UNISSUED UNISSUED FUNDING COSTT. COSTS MA1NT. Other Drainage 081012 Sequoia Park Drainage 0 0 1203 DW 1203000 1203 D0 Other Drainage 061013 Thunderbird Drainage 0 0 97, D0 91070 97000 Othm Drainage Oe10t1 Darns rt Worth Drive Ora inage 0 0 371, D0 371.000 374000 Other Drainage 0010.16 Corbin R dad Bridge 0 0 1.103,000 1,103000 1,103,00 Other Drainage 081011 Fort Worth Drlvs Drainage 0 0 928 500 926,000 916,000 O1ner Drainage 081016 Rauch E stales Drainage 0 0 1,598000 1,598.000 1.548900 Other Uaunage 081018A Ranch E slates Dramage(Minor Systems ADovegrdundi 0 0 275,000 235,000 235,000 Other Drainage 0510 le A Ranch Eslales daina9ry Minor Systems Above Grand) 0 0 335,000 335,000 333.00 Oil at Oranage 0810-18-B Ranch Eetales Drainage(Mina Syslemk LMdmground) 0 0 761,000 764 000 761,000 Other Orainage 0810 2D Houston Pli ceiskno Drainage 0 0 517,000 5174000 517000 Other Drainage 0610 22 highland Park Road Drainage 0 0 210000 210,000 210,000 Other Drainage 081023 E Hickory Streirl Drainage 0 0 191,000 191.000 191 CO , Other Drainage 081024 5 F, Adell Street Drainage 0 0 339,000 339.000 33900 Other damage 081026 Oakland Slreel Drainage 0 0 1,049,000 1,019,000 1,049.007 Other Drainage 081027 Northridge Drainage 0 0 314000 311,000 311,00 Other Drainage 081025 Strickland Junior High Drainage 0 0 10600 106,000 106.000 Other Drainage 0810.29A Good SamarBen Voltage Drainage (Option 2) 0 0 469000 469,000 469 OW OBrei Drainage 0810 31 Shady Oaks Drainage 0 0 987,000 91 967000 Oilier damage 061033 Eclor Street dana0e 0 0 811000 611,000 e11,000 (nher Drainage 081038 Willow Creek Or linage Kerley To Morse 0 0 81100 814,000 a14OW Other Drainage 081D 43 Penn Creek University to Cordes 0 D 600000 6W DOD 600000 Other Dram age 081D 44 Pecan Crest; Cordes to Fution 0 0 300,000 300,DW 300 DW Other Drainage 08.045 Pecan Creek San Gabriel to Colorado 0 D 362.000 36200 362,000 Other Drainage 0810 49 Pecan Creek SperKoi Shady Oaks 3 0 215.000 215,000 215.000 Other Drainage 081031 Cooper Creek FM2164 to Brooke Street 0 0 411,000 414, D0 414.000 Other Drainage 081057 Angeline Bend Drainage 0 0 117,000 117,000 117 00 Other Drainage 0810 58 Mills Road Drainage 0 0 641900 617,000 647 00(1 Other Drainage 0810 62F Miscellaneous Drainage Improvements 0 0 283,000 263,000 263,000 Other Drainage 0810 63 El Paced Drive French dam System 0 0 11,000 27, D00 27 D0 Other Drainage 0019.04 Santa Monica Drive Drainage 0 0 131,000 134900 134,000 Other Drainage 0510 66 Bernardr5ycamclo Street damage 0 0 333,00 333,000 333.000 Other Drainage 0510-67 JohosvirDaughedy Street Drainage 0 0 160,000 160,000 160,000 Other Dramoge 0810-60 Wood Sbeel Orainage 0 0 111,000 117,000 111,000 Offer Drainage 061070 JsgWScnpture Street Drainage D 0 79,00 7800 7900 Othel Drainage 081071 i50eet Dramoge 0 0 15300 153005 153000 Other Drainage 001072 Mont"ld Lake Bypass 0 0 269 No 262,005 262000 Other Drainage 081074 Peril Oaks Drainage D 0 260,00 260.00 266000 Other Drainage 0010 75 B Pecan Creek Improvements North of Sycamore Street 0 0 1 500.000 1.50000 1 500 WO E Other Drainage 051075 C Pecan Creek Improvements North at Sycamore Street 0 0 200 000 2,00000 2 000 000 Other damage 0610-76 8omie Br s. Box Culvert 0 0 26100 261,00 261,00 Other Drainage 081077 King Rat Boa Culvert At C doper Branch 0 0 133,000 133,00 ?33 ON mlua.i c~,unu«rr d olwaeiar. ~rN Cw'n:r nP a«r« NMriAl[1i 9 f 4 Noma -4maL~lm%MLMAM-NmJLmm i B moms 0 auto 0 I r i 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT__ - TOTAL _ IMF h/0j REQUIRED AIO TOTAL OPERAT . PROJECT EXISTING _ IISSUED OTHER CITY IN POTS AND YEAR DIVIDEPT NUMBER PROJECT NAME BONDS UNISSUED UN__ _ FUNDING COSTT COSTS 1 MAINT. Other Drainage 0510.78 Paisley Street Boa Culvert at Service Center 0 0 83,000 83 DOD 83000 Other Drainage 061060 laurehvood Drainage l mpovairri D D 191, DOC 191.000 191.000 Other Drainage 0810.61 Taylor Park Channel irnprovements 0 0 941. DOO 941 DOD 94.010 Critter Drainage OB10-62 Memo Slreel Drainage lmpmvemenls 0 0 63000 63000 63000 Other Drainage 0810-63 Eagle Drive Drainage Phase ll 0 0 1,516.000 1,516000 1,516000 Other Trans 0010-11 PershinglJuno Vey Recemlrudion 0 0 4000 4000 4000 Dther Trans 001055 Bernard Street paving and Drainage 0 0 1,691 000 1,691,000 1.691.000 01hee Irons 001050 Kings Row Paving and Drainage 0 0 2,465000 2465,000 2,465,000 Other trans 001061 Ent Windsor Drive Paving and Diauvage 0 0 812000 412,000 812000 Other irons 001062 West Windsor Drive Paving and Orwi (opfion l 0 0 3,610 000 3610000 3 610 000 Other Irani Will b3 Soulh Bunie Brae Paving and Darage 0 0 2502000 2 502000 2,502,000 Other Trans D010 64 Fvtayfin Road Paving and Drainage PH I 0 0 5,366.000 5.366000 5.366. DOD Other Trans 001065 Maytill Road Paving and Drainage PH 11 0 0 4046.000 4,046000 4046,000 01hcr Trans 001075 Masch Branch Road Phase 1' 0 0 1643 ON 1,643.1410 1,643 DOD r Other trans 001011 Slate School Road Pavai¢and Drainage 0 0 1,176,000 1,116000 1,176000 Omer Trans 0010 62 Scripture Street Paving and Drainage 0 0 1252.043 1,252,000 1,252 WO Other Trans 0010 95 Phi Lane Paving and Drainage 0 0 1,265,000 1 265,DOO 121 000 Other bans 0010.101 Volhold Road Paving 0 0 61,000 81,000 67,000 Omer Trans 0010105 Greenleaf Circle Paving a Drainage D 0 166,000 164000 168,000 Other Trans DOW 106 Laltirnors Street Paving a Drainage 0 0 404,000 404,000 004 ON Other trans 0010 110 Mmkingbad Lane Paving and Drainage( Paisley la Audi 0 0 446000 446 DOD 446.000 Other Irani 0010112 Lindsey Steel Cut Do Sac 0 0 53,000 53,000 53000 r . Oder Tuns DOW 113 Maple Slreel Paving and Disinsoliv lch to Bernard) 0 0 224,000 224,DOC 724,000 Oiler trans 0010-114 Ranch Eseles Slreel DOnal UL110n 0 0 755.000 755,000 155.000 Oiler Trans 0010117 Oakes Street Paving 0 0 52,000 52,000 52,000 Oiler trans 0010-116 Mmeuaneous Sii Rewstrud+on 0 0 500,000 WC DOD Soo ON Other trans 0010 119 Meadow RKW Drive CuI Do Sac 0 0 48.000 48,000 48.000 Omer iron! 0010 121 Welch at Hrithland Rlghl turn lane 0 0 24,000 24,000 24,000 Other Trani 0010 123 McCwr li Street EalenxonlParvin to Posel wail 0 0 278,000 276,000 276,000 4 Other Trans 0010127 South Bonnie Brae Improvement 1371 to Ro selawn) 0 0 1018. DOD I Ole 000 1.Ole WO Other Trans 0010126 Roselawn Examw lJoirei Street to 1351 0 0 1,195 NO 1,10 NO 1,19500 Other Trans 0010 130 East WnWSor Drive Extension 0 0 396,000 396000 396.000 Other tune 0010131 West Airport Free way 0 0 6962000 61ON 6962000 Other trans 0010134 Oplicom System D 0 53,000 53000 53000 Other Trans 0010135 Feielawn Paving grid Drainagel Bernard to Fort Worth U,we) 0 0 363 000 363 000 363000 1 Otrer Trans WI O 150 two 256 Bypass. Spencer 10 635 0 0 4,000 COO 4 000 000 4 000 000 Other barn 0010-152 Mngo R cad Psiong hoprovemehts l Mockingbird to Cooper C reek Road) 0 0 787000 7117000 78700 Other Iraris 0010153 Kendotph Slieel paving 6 Drainage 0 0 169.000 169 DOD 169 DOD Other Tracu 0010155 South Locust Street Paving a Duinape 0 0 889 DW 809 ON 889000 ,~iw., ~.na.n.v a uesrron tiid •e.M• •a w~•' a nva uowu, I 0 I 4 I I l' f ''4 f ~ 1 L 1 I! f 1 1! 1 1 1 1 a!~ ~f~ 32x [ ' r >•sno. ' 1 r ' .fir. I ! I 1 I t l : ~ I . 1 f 1 G f I _ 1 I i I ! I I I l l.,! I l i I 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GENERAL GOVERNMENT TOTAL (MEMO) REQUIRED AID TOTAL OPERATPROJECT EXISTING AUTK UNAUTH, OTHER CITY IN PROJECT AND YEAR DIVIDEPT NUMBER IIIOJEOT NAME BONDS UNISSUED UNISSUED FUNDING COSTT, COSTS MAINT. Other Trans 0010.15E Meadow West PevUv S Drainage 0 0 381,000 381,000 361,000 Oltwr Trans 0010157 Muce4neovs Trafyc Sgnol Construclion 0 0 300000 300,000 300,000 - Other Trans 0010 IS6 Mrsooll"m Sidewalk ConsWUion 0 0 200,000 200,000 200.000 Other Perks 0063300 Improven+enls to Chic Center Pad Phase III 0 0 1,000.000 1,000 000 1,000,000 55 D00 Other Parks 006328 Northe aal Rove abort Center 0 0 2,400,000 2,400.000 2,400,000 188.000 1 OO+er Parke 001502 landscape loop 286(Nol budpetedby TX DOT) 0 274,000 0 274,000 274,000 $48,000 40.000 Other Parke 006308 Now Actuates Center 0 0 2,269,000 2,289,000 2,269,000 74,000 Other Parks 006332 Crvk Center Buldirg Renovation 0 0 0 976,000 976,000 918,000 Olher Pads 006333 Development of Northeast Perk Site Phase II 0 0 440,000 440,000 440,000 5d 000 Other Anporl D010V Reconstruct sarmuud and op ova runway safety area. 0 0 100,000 100,000 1.000 ,000 1,100,000 10,000 Other Arporl 0010010 Construct 1.500 fool Runway I T wension to Oro noih 0 0 335,000 20,000 4154000 3.014 ON 3,431,000 , Other Arporl DOI0011 Construct ParohlToKmayToRunway 17135 0 0 250.000 250,000 2,250,000 2,500,DOO Other Arport OOID-06 Comprehensive Airport Inhsstructire Improvements 0 0 160,000 180,000 1,620,000 18D0.000 Other Arport DO 10-0? Land Acqusdion 0 0 72,060 72000 648,000 720060 Other Airport 001006 Construct Tcmmal Suftig 0 0 500 DDO 500.000 200,000 760,000 v Other A+rpol 001009 General Aviation Automobile Pedtrg Lot 0 0 16,000 16,000 1444000 160 000 Omer Library 7001 New North Brunch Library 0 0 2,500, D00 2,-00,000 2.500,600 349,000 r Other Library 7001 New Main Sulldinp 0 0 11,500, DOO 11,500006 11,500,000 922,000 I M • Other Police 0040-Of J4N Expansion 0 0 600000 600000 SmDIX) 27,000 i 1 I ~r t I i(. ' 'inaMrceYkMrYVNpYUn. MaxYYiox MarwYAlM mweM a i :~~a~,J ~;~~;,1 25 ❑ 32 x M O am►aw O i .r I I i i CITY OF DENTON 5~ 1 1 i 12 I I'i~ l l l f ''4 I za ! IJ i I t i l l# l i l 10 32X i i i c r l i I I I i I i I ELECTRIC ~R ei [ ~l ri n yy~ e r j, 1!L" A a T i , 1 s 1 Y I Y I I I! i~ I j! F j i 1 .Y! 4 .I 1! I I! I I i I( ~ 1998.200 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH RECiAEMENTS ELECTRIC UTILITY (1 X 1000) _ NUMBERlkT CATEGORY 1611 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL 1 OWE? PRODUCTION ADDITIONS SO 10 SO $650 50 $650 2 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 500 500 500 500 500 2,500 3 OVERHEAD E%TENSIONSAMPROVEMENTS 450 315 450 401 448 2,130 4 UNDERGROUNDEXIENSAMPROVES 2,282 1,966 1,775 1,461 1,461 6,947 5 DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS 504 564 820 703 159 3.150 6 METERS 298 313 330 347 364 1,652 7 AUTOMATED METER READING 177 161 145 130 130 743 6 DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATIONS 1,029 1,437 968 145 553 4,132 9 STREET LIGHTING 205 203 216 210 211 1,047 10 RESERVED 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 135 95 120 95 85 530 12 69 KV UPGRADE 441 700 456 350 408 2,357 13 CONTINGENCY 300 400 400 400 400 1,900 14 OFFICE EQUIP, COMP, FURN, SYS MAP 33 10 10 10 10 73 15 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 53 0 0 0 0 55 16 COMMUNICATIONS ANDCONTROL 290 100 0 0 40 430 11 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENT 35 38 38 37 31 181 j . 15 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT 58 163 20 30 36 316 19 OVER, TO UNDER CONVERSIONS 335 341 260 275 290 1.501 20 MISCELLANEOUS, OTHER _ 12 14 18 16 20 60 TOTALS: 17,136 11,340 66,324 16,776 $0,164 532,314 BONOFUNDED $1,603 12,088 11,375 $442 1956 18,466 CURRENT REVENUE 5.538 5,292 4,951 5,333 4,796 25,906 i AID IN CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 O7AtS: $7,139 17,380 16126 66,770 H,784 132,374 i "GROUP ASSIr,NMENT jCAj NUMBERS are useQ for 16enUTiuUon of CIA Projed4 by major utepory of 4Rp4nsa LEGEND; $ (GI GROWTH ININEWEGUIVMENT ISI STATUTORY (q IMPROVED SERVICE (RI REPLACEMENT III TECHNOLOGY 13 ;:''x4'41• 25x r 3iLw5,11~',:' ~~MI 0 32) 1 iiiiiii= ■ A s , 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELECTRIC UTILITY PROJECT BOND CURRENT UTILITY A104N FISCAL YEAR NUMBER GA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSIR COST 091011,01 11 ITT POWER PLANT EQIPMENT W 135 933 90 1741 Ii 51-+01'02 14 ITI OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 6 6 0 6 TOTAL 1931 11" ELECTRIC PRODUCTION W $4 14 940 11-101141 3 (0) OtH EXTENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS 10 1470 1460 /o 900 191011-02 17 (01 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 0 36 36 0 37 11.103143 4 IG) UIO EXTENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0 2,292 2,212 0 1,212 11.103144 6 10) TRANSFORMERS AND EQUIPMENT 0 604 604 0 104 /9103105 11 (1) MI SC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 W 60 0 10 11103104 It III QIH TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS 0 111 119 0 111 31 103147 14 (0) MISC. OFFICE EQVIPMENTfURWTURE 0 f 1 0 6 ".103101 12 (GI IIKV LI'AE UPGRADE (POLES AND CONDUCTOR) 441 0 Mt 0 MI N 103101 11 101 COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 0 34 3I 0 31 191031 10 1 (GI RESIDENTIAL STREETLIGHTS 0 103 103 0 103 91.103611 1 (0) ARTERIAL STREETLIGHTS 0 It 42 0 42 111031-11 1 101 STREET LIGHTS - SECURITY 0 40 40 0 40 0 011.13 2 IOU CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 100 600 0 600 191031.14 13 101 CONTINGENCY _ 0 300 No 0 300 TOTAL 19//1011 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 311 1,704 --S,t41 99,143 11 1032 01 1 III REPLACE If AN BREAKERS 931 11 111 90 111 1f 101107 I IG) DUPLEX ARCO SUBStAtION ISO 0 190 0 160 1910124) 4 III REPLACE OVERCURRENT RELAYS 0 40 40 0 40 of 103204 I (G) LAND PURCHASE FOR NEW SUBSTATION SITE SO 0 60 0 10 191932 OS 11 IRICAPITAL TOOL AND EQUIPMENT 0 40 60 0 40 01-10320 16 01 MISC FIBER OPTIC PROJECT 0 100 100 0 100 11-103201 14 (TIOFFICE FVRMIURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 t t 0 7 TOTAL UN-INS ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 1114 3197 1,171 N 11,111 • 11.103341 14 101 COMPUTERS 0 4 1 0 TOTAL 1991 It" ELECTRIC ENOINEEMNO 0 14 14 ---;0--------- a- N 1014-01 6 (GI METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT 90 92U 1231 t0 1211 ".103402 1 ITI REMOTE METER READING PACKAGE 0 110 110 0 110 11103403 20 101 UNINIERRUPTIOLE POWER SUPPLY 0 it It 0 12 011-1034-04 T (T) METERING EQUIPMENI FOR RATE MONITERINO 0 N 61 0 17 TOTAL 1/111111 ELECTRIC METER FIELD SERVICES - so 461 t4l R 094041141 11 INS TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 10 910 910 t0 10 Ndof1-02 It (R) SCADA UPGRADE 111 0 171 0 ITS I1 lost -03 It III 6ERVIC E CENTER COMPUTER ROOM UPGRADE 0 t0 20 0 20 191061-04 16 (1) MCKENNA PARK COMMUNICATION FACK.ITY 0 /6 II 0 65 1S 106145 11 IN) MISC FIBER PLANT 0 12 It 0 12 19106106 14 IN) MISC OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 16 1/ 0 IS TOTAL 1991.1911 FIBER I GH 111 `J(2N 231 TOTAL 1111• T/N ELECTRIC DIPARTMENT 11,313 1,9341 7,131 H 1,111 14 I { I I t I I" ~ I 1 -~ti1 I ~:I I! l I ! i I { I i 1 E x 32" MIN 0 , o , 1998.200 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELECTRIC UTILITY _ PROJECT BONO CURRENT UTILITY MD4N FISCAL Y_AR 4 NUWEI OA PROJECT NAME _ FUND REVENUE _FUNDING CONSTR COST 00.101155 11 ITI POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT 10 136 136 $O 13S 00101141 14 ITI OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 6 6 0 _ 1 I TOTAL E0111-2000 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 10 P NO $O $40 00.103141 S JO) OAI EA I ENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS 10 1375 1316 10 1371 00103142 17 101 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 0 36 36 0 $6 00103142 4 101 U/0 EXTENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0 1,216 1,963 0 1,631 00.103144 1 101 TMNSFORMER6 AND EQUIPMENT 0 66,11 216 0 661 004021,011 11 11) MISC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 W 60 (1 10 00.103141 11 IA DM 10 UNDE RGROVND CONVERSIONS 0 311 341 0 361 00403147 14 (0) MISC. OFFICE EQUIPMENTJFURNITURE 0 6 1 0 6 00.103141 12 10)61KV LINE UPGRADE IPOLES AND CONDUCTOR) 100 0 700 4 700 0040314E U 10) COMMUNIC ATION EQUIPMENT 0 31 36 0 31 00403140 f 10) RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS 0 100 100 0 100 00-103111 1 10) SIR EET LIGHTS • ARTERIAL 0 63 63 0 63 00 103111 f 101 STKEET LIGHTS • SECURITY 0 40 40 0 40 00403113 1 10) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 600 100 0 100 001031.14 13 101 CONTINGENCY 0 400 600 0 600 TOTAL 19"4000 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 6700 11,650 $6,160 10 11,110 00103241 1 IRI REPLACE 63KV BREAKERS 111 IS 117 10 195 00103242 1 IDI NEW SUBSTATION (SOL01 PHASE I 1,300 0 1,300 0 11300 00.103243 1 p) REPLACE ELECTRO•MECH RELAYS 0 44 44 0 44 00.103244 11 111 MISC F I BE R OPTIC PIII CT 0 100 100 0 100 A 70TAL 163E-0010 ELECTRIC SUBST LTIONS 1,361 1141 11,137 14 11,677 00.103441 1 (0) METERS ANO ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT 10 1313 1313 10 1313 00.103441 1 IG) REMOTE METER READING PACKAGE 0 111 121 0 121 0(1.103441 10 (G) UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY 0 14 14 0 14 00403444 1 tR) ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION MONITORING 0 34 30 0 36 TOTAL 111162,1000 ELECTRIC METER FIELD SERVICES W 1461 417 10 NII 00404141 111 (N) TOOLI AND EQUIPMENT 10 170 NO 10 110 DO.104141 11 (R) UPGRADE FIBER RIND 0 111 121 0 121 TOTAL 11111-M FIBER 1 G1 10 213 2131 /C 1135 TOTAL 163E 440 ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT 11,015 1,2E 7,360 7,210 I I f I I I I y 25 32X 1 Q 1 i r 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELECTRIC UTILITY PROJECT BOND CLARENT UTILITY AJ04N FISCAL YEM NUINER OA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE PUNOINO CONSTR COST 011011-01 11 IT) POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT 84 531 131 60 135 01.1011-02 14 IT) OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT _ 0 E 6 0 6 TOTAL 20004001 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION 50 110 560 10 610 01.1071-01 3 (0) WH EXTENSIONS S IMPROVEMENTS 10 8460 6650 10 9460 014071-02 17 101 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 0 11 N 0 34 01.1071-03 4 101 W0 EXTENSIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS 0 1,771 1,771 0 1,776 01.103144 1 101 TRANSFORMERS AND EQUIPMENT 0 130 620 0 630 01.103146 11 111 MISC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 60 10 0 10 01103146 H III OIH TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS a 360 260 0 260 01.103141 14 10) MISC, OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURNITURE 0 1 1 0 1 01.103146 12 (0) IIIKV LINE UPGRADE (POLES AND CONDUCTORSI 116 0 161 0 131 01.103146 IS 101 COMMUNICATION EOUIPMENT 0 20 20 0 20 01.1031.10 6 (0) RE SIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS 0 101 101 0 107 01.1031-11 6 10) STREET LIGHTS- ARTERIAL a 13 63 0 13 01.1031-13 0 I01 STREET LGHTS • SECURITY 0 11 41 0 46 01.103113 1 10) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 500 600 0 600 01.1031,14 1$ 101 CONTINGENCY 0 600 100 0 600 1 TOTAL 2000.2001 E LECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 8461 64,336 94,762 SO 944703 01101241 1 11111 REPLACE 61KY BREAKERS 112 11 1101 10 107 01.1012-02 1 (0) DENTON NORTH SUBSTATION 126 0 126 0 129 01103243 1 p) REPLACE ELECTRO46ECH RELAYS 0 N 66 0 46 TOTAL 2000.2001 ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 1111 161 6661 10 $161 01103441 1 IO)METERS ARDASSOCUIED EQUIPMENT 10 1330 $130 10 6330 01.103141 7 ITJ REMOTE METER READING PACKAOE 0 121 126 a 125 'I 01.103443 20 (01 UNINTERRUPTISLE POWER SUPPLY 0 16 16 A If 0 01.103146 11 (1) METER I EST 80ARD 0 26 26 0 21 1+ 01403141 7 (RI ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION MONITORING _ 0 20 20 0 20 TOTAL 2000-2001 ELECTRIC METER FIELD SERVICES 50 1111 $611 k 66+6 1 01.101141 11 (4) TOOLS AND IQUIPME NT 10 (10 110 100- (10 TOTAL 20002001 fIBER 1019 10 f0 10 10 i 1 ,326 TOTAL 20002001 ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT 1,371 84061 ,326 64 I 0 i 4j J 16 I 1 I ~ ~ 1 i I ~ t 1 ,1 i 1 i 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I E 1 s: ?5 x l❑ 32XIO o } f I I I I I I I I i f i L~ I i I) I I i V I I I] i I I l ~ 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELECTRIC UTILITY PROJECT BOND CURRENT UTILITY ATOM FISCAL YEAR NUYSER OA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST 02.101141 11 (T) POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT 60 $36 630 60 631 I 02101142 14 ITT OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 6 { 0 1 02.101143 1 (TI POWER PLANT IMPROVEMENT! 0 _ 160 660 0 130 TOTAL 20014002 ELECTRIC PRODUCTION $4 6310 5660 60 $690 02.1031-01 3 (0) ORi EXTENSION! AND IMPROVEMENTS 0 6407 1401 10 6107 02.103142 17 (0) POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 0 31 17 0 37 021031-01 4 (0) WO EXTENSION! AND IMPROVEMENT! 0 1,111 1,111 0 1,161 02.1031-04 S (0) TRANSFORMER! AND EQUIPMENT 0 703 703 D TO 024011-06 11 (1) M19CTOOL! AND EQUIPMENT 0 b 60 0 W 02403146 H PI OM TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS 0 276 276 0 276 02.1031-01 14 (OI NBC. OFFN3 E EQUIPMENTIFURNITURE 0 S 6 0 { 024031-01 12 (0) 19KV LINE UPGRADE 1POLES AND CONDUCTOR) S60 0 360 0 360 02.103146 10 (0) COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 0 36 31 0 36 021031.10 1 (0) RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHT! 0 107 107 0 107 02403141 1 (0) STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL 0 63 63 0 63 021031.12 1 (G) STREET LIGHT! - SECURITY 0 40 40 0 40 02 1031 11 1 101 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 600 600 0 600 02103114 13 (01 CONTINGENCY 0 400 400 0 400 TOTAL 700-2002 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 1360 94,011 .131 1,136 01103201 1 IRS REPLACE it KVBREAKfAS 192 61 167 10 H7 02103201 1 p) REPLACE ELECTRO"MECH RELAY! 0 46 41 0 01 TOTAL 20013002 ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONS 192 6+3 131 60 1149 02.1034-01 4 101 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT SO 1347 6317 60 1317 021031-02 7 111 REMOTE METER READING EQUIPMENT 0 130 130 0 130 02403443 20 (01 UNI%TEW1UPTIBLE POWER SUPPLIES 0 11 11 0 11 TOTAL 2001.2002 ELECTRIC METER FIELD SERVICE! 491 6461 0 6496 0140 141 11 (N) TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT w 110 610 60 110 TOTAL 20012002 FIBER 1018 10 10 10 4 ' TOTAL 2001-2002 ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT 6"1 61,233 66,111 60 VT1 I N 32X 10 o o , 1 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ELECTRIC UTILITY PROJECT OONO CURRENT UTILITY AID4N FISCAL YEAR NUMBER OA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST 03.1011-01 11 (T) POWER PLANT EQUIPMENT W 136 116 SO 631 j 031011-02 14 (T) OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 6 S 0 6 TOTAL 20024003 ELECTRIC PRODW:TION 10 140 649 60 NO 034031-01 1 (01 OJH EXTENSION$ I IMPROVEMENTS 14 b2 S446 10 446 03103141 1? (01 POWER FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS 0 31 fl 0 31 031031-03 4 10( WO Ea TENSIONS It IMPROVEMENTS 0 1,661 11661 0 1,111 03-103144 S 101 TRANSFORMERS S EOUIPMENT 0 761 TH 0 1111 034031-06 11 p) MISC. TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 to so 0 10 03.163146 11 111 OM TO WO CONVERSIONS 0 210 210 0 260 031031-07 14 10) MISC. OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURNITURE 0 $ S 0 6 03401141 11 10) SIKV LINE UPGRADE (POLES ARO CONDUCTOR) 406 0 401 0 406 03.101140 16 10) COMMUNICATION EOUIPMENT 0 34 34 0 31 03.1031.10 $ (0) RESIDENTIAL S1REEf LIGHTS 0 1M 101 0 101 03.1031.11 1 (0) STREET LIGHTS - ARTERIAL 0 62 of 0 62 03.1031.12 0 (G) STREET LIGHTS - SECURITY 0 40 40 0 40 03.1031.13 2 101 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESEF.VE 0 600 100 0 600 03403114 11 (01 CONTING E NCY 0 400 400 0 400 TOTAL 2002.2003 ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION 1401 14,111 14,607 W 14,607 03.1012-01 6 (0) SPENCER INTERCHANGE 131KV BREAKER AND BUSS 6110 13 113 60 163 03103242 1 (0) UPGRADE LOCUST SUBSTATION TO 136KV 400 0 400 0 _ 400 TOTAL 20024003 ELECTRIC SUBSTATIONB 1660 63 1661 60 1653 03.193441 6 101 METERS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT 14 1364 1344 30 1314 03.1034-02 1 101 REMOTE METER READING EQUIPMENT 0 130 130 0 130 03103443 20 101 UNINTERRUPTABLE POWER SUPPLY 0 20 20 0 20 TOTAL 20012003 ELECTRIC METER FIELD SERVICES /0 614 614 10 1614 03.101141 11 IR) SCADA HARDWARE UPGRADES 10 140 140 W _ NO 10TAL 20012003 FIBER I CIS 0- lio- 1-0 NO TOTAL 20912003 ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT 6666 14,711 16,764 60 6,114 lB { i I I I I I i I I I '?~i I ,,;I,l I ! I I I I I l l i 1 1 1 1 - - - ` I❑ ` 25 x ❑ 32X f.~ • a , i I j I k o I I r•' ' , I I~ t ~ I WATER ,I l I Y r,l 7VY ~I, tl It t ,r r s 14 i . v r tom, r ~ , a i 4I Y v' f f -1 r ~ . i If>a, r4 ~4 1 Vr ~ ,.'~rk}+dpi::h~13'`•uE'a:w":..Z'+,~"v~"r'k''v1.,'..},p„!,q _ e r . % o 1 t I i I r` I k I ~ I I A i I i ! i 1 I .1 ) I ; i f i I I 11 I I L 11 _3 1998-2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH REQUIREMENTS WATER UTILITY X 1000) i GROUP ASSIGNMENT NUMBERS CATEGORY _ 1699 2000 2001 2002 2003 TOTAL 1 NEWWATERPLANT ITRANSLINE $0 $100 $310 $74952 $11,512 $19,874 2 BOOSTER STATION 0 60 810 4,840 4,940 10,350 3 ELEVATED STORAGE 850 2,340 700 0 0 3,890 4 DISTRI8UTION SYSTEM UPGRADE 860 1,560 100 14058 659 5,937 5 REPLACEMENT WATER LINES 485 343 357 345 300 1,830 6 FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATERLINES 200 200 2D0 200 200 1,000 7 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATERLINES 250 250 250 250 250 1,250 S OVERSIZE WATER LINES 100 100 100 100 10D 500 9 TAPS, FIRE HYDS, AND METERS 356 337 337 360 360 1,750 10 TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 137 137 204 76 90 644 11 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 250 250 250 250 250 1,250 12 COMMUNICATIONS AND CONTROL 204 0 0 0 0 204 13 OFFICE FURNITUREXOMPUTER/EOUIP t8 13 11 14 11 67 14 MISCELLANEOUS 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 REGULATORY DISINFECTION MODIFICATIONS 0 897 1,694 3,792 0 6,583 18 WATER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS 410 35 10 t0 10 475 17 STATE HIGHWAY RELOCATIONS _ 1,236 $13 0 0 0 1,$49 116,356 17,235 $7,033 $16,241 118,662 $$7,463 Bond Fund (3.421 $5.870 $5,482 $17,742 $17.111 $49,408 Current Revenue 1.859 1,477 1,485 1,405 1,371 7,597 Aid In Construction 78 88 Be 100 100 450 Grand Total 66,356 $1,236 $71033 $16,247 $14,612 167,463 1 "GROUP ASSIGNMENT (OA) NUMBERS are used for idenlikew of CIP Projects by major calepory oterpense LEGEND: (0) GROWTH IN) NEW EQUIPMENT IS) STATUTORY (1) IMPROVED SERVICE (R) REPLACEMENT (T) TECHNOLOGY `f k s 19 r `d o ' n 1998-2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WATER UTILITY TOTAL TOTAL { PROJECT BOND CURRENT UTILITY AID-IN FISCAL YEAR NUMBER OA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST 09-0450-01 13 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFLRNITURE 10 63 13 10 13 994460-02 13 (RI MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE MACHINES 0 2 2 0 2 TOTAL 1996.1991 WATER ADMINISTRATION 10 66 IS 10 15 194460-02 13 JAI OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 2 2 0 2 994460-03 10 (R) TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 6 1 0 5 11-010044 11 (A) CHEMICAL FEED AND PROCESS CONTROL EQUIP. 0 10 10 0 10 994460-06 16 (R) DISTR. CONTROL UPGRADE FOR PLANT FILTERS 0 200 200 0 200 914460-06 14 (T) VAR. FREQ. DRNE FOR LAKE PUMP STATION 200 0 200 0 200 I $94480-07 12 (A) MOTOROLA MC3 2000 BASE UNIT 0 2 2 0 2 114460-01 12 (T) REPLACE SCADA SYSTEM 176 0 1T6 0 t76 114480-09 3 (0) 2 MO ELEVATED STORAGE TANK 600 0 100 0 800 994410.10 3 (011 MO ELEVATED STORAGE FOR UPPER PLANE 280 0 250 0 260 91-046DA01 1 (GI RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FACILITIES (1168) 0 0 0 0 0 99-0460A0) 2 (01 BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM Tit-IN 0 0 0 0 0 094460002 1 (0) FINISHED WATER TRANSMISSION LINE (19911 _ 0 _ 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1196.1190 WATER PROD. 11,226 1119 61,4" f0 61,444 99.044t-01 1 (0) OVERSIZE WATERLINES 9100 60 6100 10 6100 1"41-02 13 (A) OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES 0 1 1 0 1 19-0461-03 1 (0) WATER TAPS, LOOPS 0 66 11 71 142 19-0461-04 10 (R) MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 30 30 0 30 01-0411-06 6 (RI REPLACE WATERLINE • WESTWOOD 0 16 10 0 16 ^ 09-046144 6 JR) (1991) FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATER LINES 0 200 200 0 200 , 99-0461-08 7 10) DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATERLINES 0 260 260 0 260 • 19-0461-01 11 IS) STATE HIGHWAY 17 RELOCATION 611 0 918 0 616 11-0461.10 6 IR) REPLACE WATERLINE • ARCHER TRAIL 0 100 100 0 100 19-0411.11 12 IN) RADIOS 0 12 12 0 12 194411.12 11 (R) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 260 260 0 2" 11-0411012 17 (9) STATE HIGHWAY 360 RELOCATION • MIDDLE EAST 420 0 620 0 620 11-0461!06 I (AI REPLACE WATERLINE • WESTCHESTER 0 232 232 0 232 11-0461.107 1 (RI REPLACE WATERLINE. SANDPIPER 0 131 136 0 131 19-0461!12 4 (q DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE (BERNARD) 610 0 180 0 660 . TOTAL 1116.1991 WATER DISTRIBUTION 2,196 1,291 3,410 674 63,566 • 11-046241 1 JR) WATER METERS 10 oleo 1110 60 1160 11-0462-02 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES 0 1 1 0 1 114412-03 10 IS) MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 12 02 0 12 104412-04 13 (R) OFFICE MACHINES 0 1 1 0 1 914412-00 1 (R) REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS AND VALVeS 0 34 34 0 u 91.0412-01 12 JR) RADIOS 0 16 11 0 16 TOTAL1998.1191 WATER METER REPAIR --~0 313 131---13 - so 373 20 ~ I( ) { 1 I I I i t f! 1 i~ - RKMNA- VA ! 1 r t 1 r r i t , r- =Y . r r I T ~ f ''nr~ ~ V 1998.2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WATER UTILITY TOTAL TOTAL IPROJECT 90ND CURRENT UTILITY AID{N FISCALYEAR NUMBER OA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNOINO CONSTR COST "011741 10 )6) FIELO EOMPMENT 60 11 $1 60 61 11-011542 17 )R) OFFICE EQUIPMENT 6 FURNITURE 0 1 1 0 1 11411541 11 171 OFFICE MACNINES 0 / A 0 6 TOTAL 11/6.1111 WATER ENOINEERINO 60 7 67 60 {7 61-0160-01 10 1111 LAO EQUIPMENT 60 41 64 60 64 ; 91411042 13 (T) (W INFORMATION MONT SYSTEM 0 t 2 0 2 914110-07 10 (R) LABORATORY EQUIPMENT 0 16 16 0 _ 16 TOTAL 1S"1019 WATER LABORATORY 60 621 21 60 621 TOTAL 1116.1 WATER DEPARTMENT 1,11 1,669 6,210 76 66,166 j; t 1 ( ,Y f 21 1, Y r i I e ' 0 ~I i ( 1998-2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WATER UTILITY TOTAL TOTAL IPROJECT BOND CURRENT UTILITY AID-IN - FISCAL YEAR NUMBER OA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST 004450-01 12 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURNITURE 90 13 13 SO 13 094450-02 13 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE MACHINES 0 2 2 0 2_ TOTAL 1999.2000 WATER ADMINISTRATION SO 15 16 f0 SS 00.0460-01 11 (3)OZONATION(SPENCER PLANT) OISINF,SYSTEM 6397 60 1397 $O 6397 00.0450-02 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 2 2 0 2 00-0450-03 10 (R) TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 6 6 0 S 004460-04 16 (R) CHEMICAL FEED AND PROCESS CONTROL EQUIP. 0 10 10 0 10 D04460-09 16 (R) REPLACE EXISTING CHEM. STORAGE TANK 0 2S 26 0 25 00-0460-07 2 (0) BOOSTER STATION FOR THE UPPER PLANE 60 0 50 0 60 00-0460-06 16 (0) CHLORINATION SYSTEM OAS SCRUBBERS 500 0 500 0 S00 00-0460A01 1 (0) RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FACILITIES (1161) 0 0 0 0 0 004460A03 1 (0) BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN 0 0 0 0 0 , 00-0460002 1 (G) FINISHED WATER TRANSMISSION LINE (1991) 100 0 100 0 700 00-0460106 3 (G) 2 MO ELEVATED STORAGE TANK 1,460 0 1,450 0 1,450 J 00-0460K10 3 (0) 1 MG ELEVATED STORAGE FOR UPPER PLANE 190 0 190 0 690 TOTAL 1990.2000 WATER PROD. 13,301 542 63,N9 -~0 13,439 00.0461.01 1 (G) OVERSIZEWATERLINE$ 6100 10 5100 60 6100 00.045142 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES 0 1 1 0 1 00.0461-03 9 10) WATER TAPS, LOOPS 0 72 72 16 160 00.0451.04 10 (R) MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 30 30 0 30 004441.05 6 (R) REPLACE WL - RANCH ESTATES1 0 25 2S 0 25 00-046144 6 (A) (2000) FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATEALINES 0 200 200 0 200 00-046147 5 (R) REPLACE WATERLINE - AMARILLO 0 11 11 0 11 00446141 7 (G) DEVELOPMENTPLAN WATERLINES 0 250 260 0 250 00-0461-09 4 11) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE (LOOP 266) 126 O 126 0 126 e 00.0"140 4 p) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE • HWY 377 75 0 75 0 75 00-0461.12 11 (R) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 250 250 D 259 00-0461012 17 (S) STATE HIGHWAY 360 RELOCATION •MIDDLEIEAST 617 0 $13 0 413 00-0461J12 4 (1) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE (BERNARD) 151 0 169 0 659 00.04611406 1 (R) REPLACE WATERLINE - OAKWOOD 0 301 307 0 307 00.0461K09 4 STATE HIGHWAY 77 RELOCATION S00 0 600 0 FOO_ TOTAL 1999.2000 WATER DISTRIBUTION -X7,273 -61,110 13,419 _18-6- S3.501 1 00-046241 0 (R) WATER METERS 60 1134 6134 60 1134 00.046242 13 IR) OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 1 1 0 1 00.0462-03 10 (S) MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 12 12 0 12 00.046244 13 IR) OFFICE MACHINES 0 1 1 0 1 00.0462-06 9 (R) REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS AND VALVES _ 0 43 43 0 43 ` TOTAL 1199.2009 WATERMETEA REPAIR $261 IIfE 00.0413.01 10 (S) FIELD EQUIPMENT 10 61 61 69 N 004463-02 13 IR) OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE 0 1 _ 1 0 _ 1_ TOTAL 1996-2000 WATER ENGINEERING {0-- -~2 0 JI{ 22 i I ~ 1 f i -r i i 1 1 ( 1 1 I 1 .32 El J e .i , n I. I 4 I,"?,~ I ~ I .L:! I. ~ i i I:+ 4 :_.1 I _1 I I 11 I l ! I 11 i f l } l I L 1 1 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WATER UTILITY TOTAL TOTAL IPROJECT BOND CURRENT UTILITY .AID4N FISCALYEAR Ai NUMBER OA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST • 4 00-04104)1 1! (T) DN OtFORMATM MGMT SYSTEM 60 62 62 60 62 00-0410-02 10 (T) N.P. LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPH 0 14 14 0 14 00-04042 10 (R) LABORATORY RENOVATION 0 6 6 0 6 TOTAL 1000.2000 WATER LABORATORY S21 621 60 621 F TOTAL 1115• WATER DEPARTMENT 1,610 1,477 $7,147 SN 1,276 1 ~ ,v l~ I' 11 I I ~ ~l • rt } 2] e ARA +k ~x ? 5 Q 32 x r o o I I 1988.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WATER UTILITY _ TOTAL - TOTAL IPROJECT _ BOND CURRENT UTILITY AID-IN FISCALYEAR NUMBER OA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUN04NG CONSTR CO;T 01-0150-01 13 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURNITURE $D 11 11 f0 $1 01-015042 13 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE MACHINES A 0 2 _ 2 0 2 TOTAL 2000.2D01 WATER ADMINISTRAIION i0 13 f7 SO $3 01-0160-02 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES $D 62 63 $0 12 01-0160-03 10 (R) TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 9 5 0 i 01-0460-04 It (R) CHEMICAL FEED AND PROCESS CONTROL EQUIP.' 0 10 10 0 10 01-0460-06 10 (T) PARTICLE COUNTERS 0 TO 70 0 10 01-046DA01 1 (0) RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FACILITIES (1966) 210 0 210 0 210 01-046DA03 2 10) BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE4N 70 0 /0 0 10 01-0160002 1 IGI FINISHED WATER TRANSMIS307N LINE (1991) 100 0 100 0 100 01-0160106 3 IG) 2 MO ELEVATED STORAGE TANK 700 0 100 0 700 OS-0160K01 15 (S) OZONATK3N(SPENCER PLANT) D1SINF.SYSTEM 1,114 0 1,604 0 1,191 01446OK07 1 (0) BOOSTER STATION FOR THE UPPER PLANE 540 0 510 _ 0 510 TOTAL 2000.2001 WATER PROD 3,514f/l 63,601 -ro $3,101 01-0161-01 1 10) OVERSIZE WATERLINES 6100 {0 $100 $0 $100 014161-02 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES 0 3 3 0 3 ' 01-016103 1 (G) WATER TAPS, LOOPS 0 04 91 66 11'0 01-016141 10 (R) MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 30 30 0 30 01-0461.09 1 (R) REPLACE WL• RANCH ESTATES II 0 29 25 0 25 01-046141 6 (R) (2001) FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATER LINES 0 200 200 O 2DD 01-0461.01 IF (O) DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATERLIN£I 0 290 250 0 250 01-0461.12 11 (RI CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 290 250 0 250 ' 01-0161.13 4 (1) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE (RYAN) 04 0 04 0 61 01-0461L01 4 (1) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE (LOOP 2661 1,111 0 1,191 0 1,191 01-046100 4 (1) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE - HWY 371 525 0 $25 0 525 a 014461L09 $ (R) REPLACE WL • RANCH ESTATES 1 0 101 111 0 191 014461L07 6 (R) REPLACE WATERLINE • AMARILLO _ 0 141 141 _ 0 141 TOTAL 20002001 WATER DISTRIBUTION 1,400 1,111 -i30 71 16 3,160 01-0162-01 1 (R) WATER METERS $0 1120 $120 $0 H 0 01-0462-02 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 1 1 0 1 ` 010162-03 10 (S)MACELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 $0 10 0 60 ' 01-0112-04 13 IRI OFFICE MACHINES 0 1 1 0 1 010112-05 1 (RI REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS AND VALVES 0 47 41 0 67 TOTAL 20004001 WATER METER REPAIR --f0-sill .719 0 311 ti• r 01-0163-0f 10 IS) FIELD EQUIPMENT $0 N 11 $0 51 014463-02 13 1R) OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE 0 1 _ 1 0 _ 1 TOTAL 20004001 WATER ENGINEERING - 52 014110-01 10 IT) K P SPECTROMETER 1 11 a 148 lp 148 1O AL 2000-2001 WATER LABORATORY 0 41 0 ~6 TOTAL 2000• WATER DEPARTMENT 5,04 61.405 66.641 16 1,033 24 ' I 1 I ~ I I ~ I a I I ! I I I I i I I I I I I # 1 , Q r 1998.2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WATER UTILITY TOTAL TOTAL IPROJECT BONO CURRENT UTILITY AID-IN FISCALYEAR NUMBER GA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST 02-0460-01 13 SRI MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTJFURNITURE SO $1 11 iD 11 00-045002 13 SRI MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE MACHINES _ 0 2 2 _ 0 2 TOTAL 2001-2002 WATER ADMINISTRATION 02-044002 13 IRI OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES SO $2 12 t0 $2 020450.03 10 IR) TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 0 1 6 0 6 02-0410.04 11 (R) CHEMICAL FEED AND PROCESS CONTROL EQUIP." 0 10 10 0 10 0244MA01 1 (0) RAY ROBERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FACILITIES (1911) 31610 0 3,660 0 3,660 02-0460A03 2 10) BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN 41640 0 4,640 0 4,640 02-0460002 1 (G) FINISHED WATER TRANSMISSION LINE (1991) 4,372 0 4,372 0 4,372 02-0450K01 15 (S) 020NATION (SPENCER PLANT) DISINF, SYSTEM _ 3 792 0 3762 0 3,712 ' TOTAL 20014002 WATER PROD. 1/,6H 17X16,601 ~0 -~+6,eo1 02-0441.01 S (0) OVERSIZE WATERLINES 6100 t0 1100 60 t100 020441-02 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES 0 3 3 0 3 020411.03 9 10) WATER TAPS, LOOPS 0 40 10 100 ISO 02 040 04 10 (Rl MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENI 0 20 20 0 20 02 0441 05 S (R) 120021 REPLACE WATERLINE 0 20 20 0 20 07 0461 01 6 (RI FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATER LINES 0 200 200 0 200 02 0461 01 1 101 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WATERLINES 0 290 260 0 230 02 0461 12 11 (RI CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 250 230 0 260 020411MOS 6 IRI REPLACE WL•RANCH ESTATES 11 0 321 326 0 325 02046110113 4 (R) DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE RYAN loss 0 1.061 0 11056 TOTAL 2001.2002 WATER DISTRIBUTION ~ 1,151 {1.141 -X2,300 i 500 ~ ~ {2,4b1 02.0462.01 9 (R)WATFRMETERS $0 5530 1130 $0 $130 02-0463-02 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 1 1 0 1 02-0462-03 10 IS) MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 30 30 0 30 02-0412-04 13 (R) OFFICE MACHINES 0 1 1 0 1 024413-06 6 IR) REPLACE FIRE HYDRANTS AND VALVES 0 SO SO 0 10 TOTAL 2001,2002 WATER METER REPAIR -~3-~3T-717 t0 02.0463.01 10 IS) FIELD EQUIPMENT $0 $1 $1 t0 11 02-046342 13 (R) OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE _ 0 1 1 01 f . TOTAL 20014002 WATER ENGINEERING sb-"~1~-~3 b ~v-ff . I' 02.0410-01 10 (T) MICROSCOPE WITH FLUORESCENCE ACC6 10 120 120 f0 120 02.0450.02 13 (1) DIV INFORMATION MOM? SYSTEM _ 0 3 3 _ 0 3 TOTAL 2001.2002 WATER LABORATORY 60~ $23 TOTAL 2001• WATER DEPARTMENT S1 1.74J 61.40 19,147 100 11,34) 25 ri ~ ❑ 302' e m J 1998.2002 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WATER UTILITY T TAL TOTAL IPROJECT BOND CURRENT UTILITY AIO4N FISCAL YEAR NUMBER OA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNCINO CONSTR COST i 03445041 13 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EOUIPMENTIFURNITURE 60 61 11 60 61 034450-02 13 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE MACHINES 0 2 2 0 2 TOTAL 20024003 Wafer dept WATERADMINISTRATIO14 60 3 3 60 _ $3 03-045042 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES 60 62 12 60 62 03-040043 10 (R) TOOLS AND EQUIFMENT 0 6 6 0 6 03.040044 11 (R) CHEMICAL FEED AND PROCESS CONTROL EQUIP.-' 0 10 10 0 10 03-0460A01 1 (0) RAY ROGERTS WTP AND RAW WATER FACILITIES (1614) 7,140 0 7,140 0 71140 03-0460ADS 2 (0) BOOSTER STATION AND SYSTEM TIE-IN 4,140 0 4,140 0 040 034460002 1 (0) fINISHEO WATER TRANSMISSION LINE (1991) 4 372 D 1372 0 372 TOTAL 2002.2003 Water dept WATER PROD, ~10, 51 17 U,366 SO 611,319 034 01-01 6 (0) OVERSIZE WATERLINES 1100 60 1100 60 11 DO 03-0461-02 13 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE AND MACHINES 0 3 3 0 3 030461-03 2 101 WATER TAPS, LOOPS 0 10 10 100 110 03-0411-04 10 SR) MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 20 20 0 20 030461.05 5 (R)130031 REPLACE WATERLINE 0 20 20 0 20 01 0411 06 0 IRO FIELD SERVICES REPLACE WATERLINES 0 200 200 0 200 41.41-101 7 (0)DEVELOPMENTPLAN WATERLINES 0 260 260 0 250 03 1,4111 09 4 (1) DISTRIBUtION SYSTEM UPGRADE (LOOP 241) 160 0 ISO 0 ISO 010441 12 11 (R) CAPITAL CONSTRUCt10N RESERVE 0 T50 !SO 0 ISO 03 0411N01 5 (R) 130021 REPLACE WL 0 20 !IO 0 210 03 046IN13 4 IH) CISIRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE RYAN 606 _ 0 600 0 606 TOTAL 20024003 Water dept WATER DISTRIOUTION --i%6 - 1,103 4 62 106--y 1,662 03-0462-01 6 (R) WATER METERS 60 6130 100 10 613D 03-0412-02 13 JR)OFFIOEFURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 1 1 0 1 03-041243 10 IS) MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 30 30 0 30 03-041244 13 1R)OFFIC! MACHINES 0 1 1 0 1 50 03-041245 6 (R)REPIACE FIRE HYDRANTS AND VALVES 0 60 SO 41 TOTAL 2002.2003 Water dept WATER METER REPAIR sill I 7 ~ 21~ 03-0443-01 10 131 '.9ELD EQUIPMENT 10 11 61 60 11 03-041302 13 (R)OFFICEEQUIPMENT ANDFURNITURE 0 1 1 0 1 TOTAL 200!•2003 Water dept WATER EMOINEERINO ~soso d 03-041141 10 11I MASS SPECTROMETER 10 614 114 60 614 03-041042 10 (R) LABORATORY EQUIPMENT - 0 14 14 0 14 03041043 10 (R)LASORATORY•FURNACEIAC UNIT 0 6 6 0 S TOTAL 2002.2003 Water dept WATER LABORATORY ~so 134 -134--j0 TOTAL 2002• WATER DEPART 611.110 1,371 ASI 100 1!,512 26 I I I ! I I I I I i) I I I I I! I I! i l l l l} i} - - 15 ~ 10 32 x 10 c _i. i I I 1 I t I i f ! ~ .r t 41 )1 `y 1 V ~ t♦ WASTEWATER rll 1 ~ I' + 11111 1 It I n I 0 Pi'r 1 ' rr" 11 i _ ~ ~r .11 t t r r r+ 1 T .r s,* . J 5 i 1 wr ~41 , 1 qa 4 k, ~ F i~ 1 a1 t r,~ {r, ii° ~eir~' 1~if .^"g !~!~1~y1 ~ t n~J9 r~i, aPl}rt ct~e ~~iJ ~ ,r I u4sAer 1 1 I , 1690.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH REQIREMENTS WASTEWATER UTILITY (Sx1w) OROUP ASSIONMENT' NUMBERS CATEGORY 1935 2000 7601 2002 2003 TOTAL 1 WASTEWATER PLANT IMPROVEMENTS $150 $175 3110 50 30 3395 2 WASTEWATER PLANT EXPANSION 200 640 8,000 6,000 0 13,040 3 LIFTSTA110N IMPROVEMENTS 1,500 4 0 0 55 1.559 4 COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 REPLACEMENT SEWER LINES 1,107 649 350 350 350 2 606 6 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES 250 250 250 250 250 1,250 7 OVERSIZE WASTEWATER LINES 100 100 100 100 100 500 6 INFILTRA710WINFLOW 050 1,135 750 650 550 4.435 0 TAPS 50 50 50 50 50 250 10 TQOLS AND EQUIPMENT 73 70 100 163 69 475 11 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 250 250 250 250 250 1,250 12 COMMUNICATIONS 6 CONTROL 71 31 0 0 0 106 13 OFFICE FURWCOMPUTERfEQUIP 17 10 6 34 6 61 14 MISCELLANEOUS 30 300 40 62 10 462 15 STATE HIGHWAY RELOCATIONS 610 213 0 0 _ 0 023 TOTALS: 36,261 $4,043 11,006 $3,129 $1,392 621,434 BONOFUND 63,135 32,266 60,767 $6,115 6000 319.605 . CURRENT REVENUE 2073 ,1,711 1,160 1,204 1,142 1,299 AI04N CONSTRUCTION 60 50 50 50 50 250 TOTALS: 16,261 94,049 11,006 36,121 11,312 127,434, "GROUP ASSIGNMENT (GA) NUMBERS or* used Ior idenh6uton or CIP ProAcu by m4jor ate3ory of expense LfOtND: I i' (OI OROWtH INI NEW It OUIPME NT IS; SlAtUTORY (N AIPROVED SERVrCE (RI REPLACEMENT ITITECHNOL001 • 1 1' J),01 1 27 I 25 x ~ ri 32X ,I • o 1998.2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN WASTEWATER UTILITY TOTAL 10TAL PROJECT BOND CURRENT CITY AIO-IN FISCALYEAR NUMBER OA PROJECTNAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTRCOST 01-045141 12 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURNITURE 60 60 62 60 62 16-0161.02 12 (R) OFFICE MACHINES 60 6!67 60_ 61 TOTAL 1191.5111 WASTEWATER ADMIN. 60 65 65 10 $5 19.0470-01 12 ITI LIFT STATION SCADA 60 629 621 60 126 ' 0044"p S IS) PROCESS IMPROVEMENT 0 0S 0S 0 25 11-0171-d. 1 ITI REF AUTOMATIC BAWLER$ 0 46 41 0 41 61-04,1041 10 IT) SURVEILLANCE CAMERA 0 20 20 0 20 000-0170-00 12 IT) TRANSMISSION OF PLANT 6CADA 0 6 I 0 1 11.0470-01 12 (0) PLANT 6CADA REFORMAT O 20 20 0 20 11-0170-07 1 (51 FLOW SPLIT (ELECTRIC VALVE ACTIVATORI 0 06 21 0 76 19447001 2 151 WWTP UPGRADE • 21 MOD 200 0 200 0 200 104470-01 1 (q ODOR CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS 0 20 20 0 20 99.0170.10 14 (T) BENEFICIAL REUSE PILOT PLANT 0 30 SO 0 20 TOTAL 10164911 WATER RECLAMATION 1200 1251 5451 10- 1491 99 047107 7 (GI OVERSIZE SEWERLINES 6100 60 6100 60 1100 99041142 10 (R) W3CELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 10 10 0 10 110111-03 S tO) SEWER TAPS 0 0 0 10 60 11017104 6 (0) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWERLINES 0 200 250 0 !SO 910//105 12 IR)RADIOS 0 1S IS 0 16 190//1-01 6 IR) MANHOLE REHABILITATION 0 ISO 150 0 ISO 110471-01 6 IRI FIELD SERVICE IAMIARY SEWER REPLACEMENT 0 60 60 0 60 90 041110 16 (R) HWY it SEWER LINE RELOCATION-300 TO IJ6 400 0 400 0 400 01011111 6 (R)REKSEWER LINES -UNDERWOOD•PHASE O 0 1S 12 0 47 + 01-01114! 1I (R) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 260 250 0 !SO 194471002 6 (0) HICKORY CREEK INTERCEPTOR CROSSINGS 0 600 600 0 no • 11-0411011 IS (R) HWY SOO SEWER LINE RELOCATION41.11 TO LOOP 211 210 0 210 0 210 114411N10 1 (0) REPLACE SEWERLINES• ARCHER TRAIL 0 210 2S0 0 ISO 11.0111106 1 pI(1961)UPORADEINTE411CEPTORAINFILTRATIOWNFLOWCORRECTION4'HASEI T00 0 700 0 700 01-0411J11 1 (G) REPLACE 6EWERLINES•UNDERWOOD-PHASE 1 0 261 2% 0 201 01-0/71J72 2 (11 COOPER CREEK LIFT STATION 1600 0 1100 1 - TOTAL 11164111 SEWER COLLECTION v 11,1 4 5, S2 ,012 7630- O"T600 'a- RF 28 I I I I I i I I t I I 1 I -i I 1 1 1 I I f l I a5 x ~C 32x~❑ Sf i. ~ Y~ ° f I f f r ~ r_ S t:t I~IYRNI ~ ' % 7M♦tltlq r r h • 11 1 ~ . i ' t r t ~ e f i y fI r I.~ f ~ Y + 1V 9 i i• I I 2 / 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN WASTEWATER UTILITY _ .r TOT7i r6"L PROJECT BOND CURRENT CITY AID4N FIOCALYEAR NUMBER OA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST 11-047241 10 101 FIELD EQUIPMENT 10 11 U 10 13 114472-01 13 IR1 OFFICE EWIPMENT E FURNITURE 0 1 1 0 1 TOTAL IIII.1MWASTEWATER EN0INEERING 10OD N 111-0411-01 13 IN) LABORATORY DATA PPOTECMN 10 11 N 10 N "448142 10 (N) LABORATORYEOUIPMENT 0 1 0 0 S 11-041143 10 (N) LABORATORY CASEWORK 11 0 20 0 11 11-041141 11 IN) DIV INFORMATION MOMT SYSTEM 0 1 1 0 1 TOTAL INI•IIN WASTEWATER LABORATORY 16 1 44 0 114117-01 10 IT) RADIONUCLIDE MONITOR 19 11 17 N p 114113-01 If 1R)PORTABLERADIOS 0 1 1 0 1 TOTAL If10.11" WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT 0 11 011 TOTAL 11101.1110 WASTEWAIERO PARTMENT 15117 1,071 $5,204 6 0,110 ;.5 I „ r~ 1Y,y ,r • i 29 pt 1 3 , !dp {54K~ ~32x 1 f 1998.1009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN WASTEWATER UTILITY TOTAL _TOTAL PROJECT BOND CURRENT CITY AID-IN FISCAL YEAR NUMBER OA _ PROJECT NAME FUND _ REVENUE FUNDING CONSTA cost 00-0451-01 13 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EOUIPMENTIFURNITURE 30 13 63 (0 13 00.0451-02 13 IR) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE MACHINES $0 12 111062 TOTAL 1591.2000 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT WASTEWATER AD_ {0 6S f0 S5 00.0470-01 14 JR)TUBGRINOER 10 6300 1300 f0 1300 00.0470-02 12 IT) LIFT STATION SCADA 0 37 71 0 3? 00447043 1 (SI PROCESS IMPROVEMENT 0 35 35 0 35 00-041004 3 ISM LIFT STATION RENOV 0 4 4 0 4 00-0470-05 1 IT) ULTRASONIC LEVEL INDICATORS 0 30 30 0 30 00-0470-06 1 IS) FENCING 0 6S 41 0 IS 00-041007 1 (R) RETURN SLUDE FLOW METER UPGRADES 0 0 1S 0 16 00-0470-Kol 2 IS) WWTP UPGRADE • 21 MOD 940 0 940 _ 0 _ 640 TOTAL 1911.2000 WATER RECLAMATION 5140 - 1471 ~{1,36~ 10 X1,511 00.0471-01 7 SO) OVERSIZE SEWER LINES $to0 10 5100 10 1100 , 00-047102 10 (R) MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 10 0 10 000471.03 9 (0)SEWER TAPS 0 0 0 10 60 00-0411.04 4 (0) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES 0 250 230 0 ISO 00-0471.05 1 17)111 CORRECTION • MIDDLE PECAN CREEK BASIN IS 4 IIS 0 10 00.0471.06 1 111 in CORRECTIOSMOKE TESTING - HICKORY CREEK 0 200 200 0 '00 00.001.01 1 (R) MANHOLE IMPROVEMENT 0 150 110 0 150 00-0471 .0 1 JAI FIELD SERVICE SANITANYIEWEA REPLACEMENT 0 W 10 0 W 000471-10 6 (R) (2000) REPLACE IEWER LINE 1 0 1{ 11 0 15 00041112 11 (R) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 250 250 0 290 00-0471011 16 (R) HWY 110 SEWER LINE RELOCATION-ELM TO LOOP 226 211 0 113 0 213 00-0411105 1 (1)IACORRECMN-WESTERN PECAN CREEK BASIN 1`00 0 700 0 700 00.0471KII 6 (R) REPLACE SEWERLINE6 • UNDERWOOD PHASE II 0 134 134 0 234 00.0471KIO 9 (R) HWY 17 SEWER LINE RELOCATIOW360101-05 354 0 $50 0 350 TOTAL 1199-2000 SEWER COLLECTION 111444 11,160 {2,007 S30 i2,01 00.0472-01 10 (3) FIELDIQUIPMENT 60 0 13 10 63 00-041242 13 (R) OFFICE EOUIPMENI AND FURNITURE 0 1 1 0 1 00-047243 13 (1) OFFICE MACHINES 0 6 1 0 1 TOTAL 109.2000 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING so 00-0411-01 13 (T) ON INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM 10 63 12 10 13 . 00-0411-02 10 (T) HIGH PC AFORMANC 9 LIQUID C HROMATOGRAPH 0 36 31 0 30 TOTAL 101.2000 WASTEWATER LABORATORY X13-'~13 fd-Gb 00448341 10 IS) REMOTE MOWTORINO EQUIPMENT 60 NO (10 10 110 00.0413-02 10 16) PRETREATMENT SAMPLINOISAFETY 6 1 1 0 1 00.0413-03 13 IT7 DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM 1 3 3 0 _ 3_ TOTAL 1004000 PRETREATMENT V--~rO- -~'vff -0 X35 TOTAL 1104000 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 12,211 IJI1 63,0 0 4,041 30 I I ~ ~ ~ 1 I I) s l r+ s,-;a ~ ~ I I I r l r r 1 s( a: l 32XIQ isms" III 1998.2002 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN WASTEWATER UTILITY TOTAL TOTAL IPROJECT BOND CURRENT CITY AID-IN rISCAL Y NUMBER OA PAOJECTMAME FUND REVENUE FUNDINO CONSTII _COSi 01446141 13 JR)MISCELLANEOUSOFFICE EQUIPMENT!FURNITURE 10 63 $3 $0 13 01-0131-02 13 IR) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE MACHINES 10^ 111 62 f0 Ot_ TOTAL MO-201 WASTEWATER ADMIN. 01-0170-01 1 II) COVERED STORAGE FACILITY 10 $50 04) f0 ISO 01-0170-02 1 IT) ROAD PAVINO 0 30 10 0 10 01417043 1 IS) FENCINO 0 30 30 0 30 01411041 11 11)TERRAOATORDAY BPREO 0 10 10 0 10 014110-KCI I 161 WWLP UPGRADE 41 MOD $ 000 _ 0 _ 1000 0 $ 0000 10741, 20002001 WA7ER RECLAMATK)N 0000 $160 1,100-~--~0 ---$6,160 01-017141 1 10) OVERSIZE SEWER LINES 1100 10 $100 $0 $100 01-0111-02 10 (R)ASSCELLANEOUSEQUIPMENT 0 10 10 0 10 01417143 0 10) SEWER TAPS 0 0 0 60 SO 01-0111-01 6 10) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES 0 160 230 0 260 01441141 1 (R) MANHOLE IMPROVEMENT 0 ISO 160 0 160 01441141 6 IR) FIELD SERVICE SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT 0 10 SO 0 60 010171.11 6 JR) (2001) REPLACE SEWER LINES 0 11 16 0 11 014I7112 11 IR)CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 260 250 0 250 0141711,01 1 III U CORRECTION • MIODLE PECAN CREEK BASIN $00 0 100 0 100 01017100 1 (R) 2000 REPLACE SEWERLINES 0 215 1$$ _ 0 _ 216 TOTAL 20002001 SEWER COLLECTION A -T1n71c- lsb" $1,/60 01417241 10 (S) FIELD EQUIPMENT 10 63 11 $0 $3 01447102 12 (R) OFFICE EQUIPMENT B FURNITURE 0 1 1 0 1 TOTAL 1000.1001WASTEWATER ENOINEERINO 14-i~~ ~l • 014111-01 10 IT) ICP SPECTROMETER (12.10 672 f0 i! TOTAL 10002001 WAS TEWATfR LABORA TONY 72 ~60 112 E f 01411341 10 IT) ICP EMIS610N SPECTROMETER 111 f0 1+e 0 111 ,I +,4 TOTAL 200 HOIP11ETAEATMENT 1/ 11 ~0 11 Ip TOTALI000M01 WASTIYVATEA DEPARTMENT 81,701 6 0' 31 p, - t, 7ti A, o 32'x r . 1. i 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN WASTEWATER UTILITY, TOTAL TOTAL PROJECT BOND CURRENT CITY AID414 FISCAL YEAR NUMBER 0+1_PROJEC7 NAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST._. 02446141 13 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURNITUR! 10 63 63 10 63 02446142 13 (R) MISCF! LANEOUS OFFICE MACHINES 60 62 62 (0 _ 62 TOTAL 2001.2002 WASTEWATER ADMIN. 65 51 60 {S 02-0470.01 14 (I) IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT 60 620 620 10 120 02-0110-02 10 IN) AIRCOMPREISOR 0 11 11 0 it 02-0110-01 13 M) COMPUTER UPGRADES 0 20 20 0 20 024110.4 14 (R) SCARAB UPGRADE 60 0 60 0 60 02-0110-K01 2 IS) NNVTP UPGRADE • 21 MOD 6,~_ 0 4000 0 -__-.00000 TOTAL 20014001 WATER RECLAMATION X6,060 $$1 0,101 60 A,iv1 - 02-017141 7 10) OVERSIZE SEWER LINES 1100 SO 1100 10 6100 02-0471-02 10 (R) MISCELLANEOUS EOUIPMENT 0 10 10 0 10 02.471-03 S (0)1EWER TAPS 0 0 0 60 60 02447144 1 (0) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES 0 260 ISO 0 260 024471-06 1 (I) MCORRECTION - EASTERNPECANCREEKBASIN 100 0 100 0 100 024471.07 1 (R) MANHOLE IMPROVEMENT 0 ISO 160 0 160 02-0471.01 1 (R) FIELD SERVICE SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT 0 60 SO 0 W 024471.11 1 (R) 120021 REPLACE A EWER LINES 0 16 16 0 11 024171.12 111 (R) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 0 260 260 0 250 02.471M06 1 (N MCORRECTK)N•MIDDLE PECAN CREEK BASIN 600 0 100 0 100 024671M11 1 (R) 2001 RIPLACE SEWER LINE (CONSTRUCTION) 0 216 216 0 216 TOTAL 2001.2003 S:WERCOLLECTION "-1j1a7 I-171 ---i2+b-~--11,860 * I 02447241 10 (5)fIELDE001PMENT SO 63 63 10 13 ' -I • 02447242 13 (R) OFFICE EOUIPMENT IS FURNITURE 0 1 1 0 1 024472-03 10 (T) CAMERA VAN 0 - 400 100 0 100 TOTAL 2001.2002WASTEWATER ENOINEEFUNO ~10 X04 1104 ~I54 I 024411-01 10 (R) LABORATORY CASEWORK 126 60 621 60 126 0241142 14 IN) WAL%4h RIFRIOERATORIFR£ESER 0 12 12 0 12 TOTAL 2001.2002WASTEWATER LABORATORY Ut sit Ot 63f- 02-0403-01 13 (T) DIV INFORMATION MOMT SYSTEM S6 11 11 10 is 02-0413 03 10 (S) LANDML MONITORINO IOUIPMENT 1 14 _ 14 0 14 . I ?DIAL 2001-2002PRE7REATMENT -13-~I1~- 7f>r~--13"7311 R TOTAL 20014002 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 111,104 11,011 813 1 j 7 1 i 32 I I I I I I I b ! '1) 4 I- ! I ! I I 1 f l 11 4 1 3 2 I X 1 r I , i C 1 I i 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN WASTEWATER UTIUTY TOTAL ~ T07IT4 PROJEC I BOND CURRENT CITY AIOJN FISCAL YEAR NUMBER OA PROJECT NAME --FUND REVENUE fUNDINO CONSTR COST 03-0451-01 13 lit) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUPMENT/FURNITURE SO 13 13 10 13 07-0151-02 17 IR) MISCELLANEOUS OFF" MACHINES 12 I2 _ 10 12 TOTAL 2002-2003 WASTEWATER ADMIN. k tiS f 10 36 031410-01 I IR) LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS 0 _ SS _ IS0 SS_ Ij TOTAL 2002.2003 WATER RECLAMAMN IZ-`- $is {63 {0 Iss 034111-01 7 10) OVERSIZE SEWER LINES SIW s0 1100 (0 1100 034171-02 10 IR) MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 0 10 10 0 10 034171-03 1 10) SEWER TAPS 0 0 0 10 W 034471-01 1 IQ) OEYELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES 0 230 250 0 250 030171-07 1 IR) MANHOLE IMPROVEMENTS 0 ISO ISO 0 ISO 03417VIII 1 (R) FIELD SERVICE SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT 0 60 60 0 SO 03-0171.11 1 IRI 2003 REPLACE SEWER LINES 0 13 IS 0 11 F 03 0471-12 11 JAI CAPITAL CON51RUCTON RESERVE 0 260 ISO 0 230 03 0171 MOs 1 (1) M CORRECTION • MIDDLE PECAN CREEK BASIN IN 0 700 0 1,1111 03 0171 MII I (R) 2002 REPLACE LINES 0 _ 299 all 0 216 TOTAL 2002.2003 SEWER COLLECTION --{10~ 71,010 11,110 -{SO ST.16 TOTAL 20022003 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING {0 03 0111 01 10 (T)MA36 SPECTROMETER Its 66 0 _ 66 TOTAL 10022003 WASTEWATER LABORATORY ~TO 766 i 10 till V y 03-011101 13 IT) DIV INFORMATION MOMT SYSTEM 0 3 I 0 S • 03-0113-02 11 III REMOTE MONITORING EOVIPMENT 0 10 10 0 10 03.0463.03 10 JAI SAMPLING EQUIPMENT 0 1 1 0 1 TOTAL 20022003 WAITEWATER PRETREATMENT 11 J~77 -10- -711 I i TOTAL 2002.2003 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 100 $1,442 Fr4l s0 7112 40. 31 Kla 32X1 1 t t vamp" ArR7tA y ♦I ( r ~ f J. . r. r n It J 1 i i CITY OF DENTON 34 r P.1 '.~~✓'tJ ii ~I ~~1♦ GG I l~t~nrl ly J~(t r 25 10 ILr E I I I I i i SOLID WASTE"'',':,,', =mama 3 A 1 ~ } r < u gay r a ~ I 7 U I. 1 , r I I I _I I i .:i I I _l I I .1 I I k I I I 1 l ! I ! I _I ! I i 1998-2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH REQUIREMENT$ SOLID WASTE S X 1000L_ GROUP ASSIGNMENT NUMBERS " CATEGORY 199! 2000 2001 2002 2003 _ TOTAL - 1 OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 11 12 12 12 10 $57 2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENT 120 690 10 0 0 1760 3 CONTAINER IMPROVEMENTSNPGRADES 185 275 195 185 193 11,033 4 SOLID WASTE OFFICE CONSOLIDATION 0 0 180 0 0 5180 5 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION RESERVES 50 50 50 60 50 1250 6 COMMERCIAL FACILITY IMPROVEMENT 42 0 0 0 0 :&2 ,c 7 LANDFILL EXPANSION-CONSTRUCTION 295 260 1500 100 0 12.155 S RECYCLING SITLADDITIONS 149 1081 0 0 0 $1,230 9 RECYCLING SITE IMPROVEMENTS S 10 15 10 5 $45 10 LANDFILL SITE IMPROVEMENTS 0 65 0 30 55 1150 11 MISCELLANEOUS 6 0 0 0 0 $6 $183 12,383 11,962 sit? 1313 16,909 SONDFUND $414 11,946 81,500 $100 10 $3,960 CURRENT REVENUE 8449 8137 8482 5267 $313 1948 ,AID-IN CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL 1863 821383 11,902 5317 1313 88,901 "GROUP ASSIGNMENT IGAI NUMBERS are used for Aent+6al'ae or CIP Projects b7 m4jor aWg" d espensl . LEGEND: (OIGROVJTN (N)NEWEOUIPMENT MI STAIUTORY (1( IMPROVED SERVICE (RI REPLACEMENT ITI TECNNOIOGY 1 35 S. 25 e 0 • I I 1998-2403 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SOLID WASTE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL IPROJECT PROJECT BONO CURRENT CITY AID-W FISCALY NUMEIER OA PROJECT NAME COST FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST N-0400-01 1 (1) MISC E L. OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT s0 $2 52 s0 $2 TOTAL 19941099 SW ADMINISTRATION SO $2 52 SO 67 994101-01 1 (1) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT s0 $3 53 $0 $3 99-0601-03 11 (RI MISCELLANEOUS TOOLS A EQUIPMENT s0 $4 $4 $0 $4 TOTAL 1991.1991 SW RESIDENTIAL $0 - 67 11 60 $7 90-060241 3 (R)DUMPSTER SCREENING so $5 65 so 65 904102-02 3 (NR)MISCELLANEOUS DUMPSTERS 0 s1/! $1611 so $is$ 99-0602-03 1 IR) MISCELLANEOUS FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 0 $2 62 $0 $2 99-0602-04 6 (uG) COMMERCIAL FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 0 US $39 90 S3S 99-0602-05 1 IN) VEHICLE CHECK POINT 0 $7 $7 so IT 99-060246 11 (N) RADIO 0 $2 $2 60 $2 194002-07 6 (N) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION 0 $SO $50 $O $so TOTAL 1228.1999 SW COMMERCIAL 60 1266 291 $0 1266 99 0401 01 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EOUIPMENT AND FURNITURE $0 62 62 60 $2 19040!-01 2 (N) FUEL TANK REVETMENT 10 $30 $30 s0 $30 09040301 2 R) REPLACE FUEL TANK so $20 $20 to $20 19 0901KO4 2 (Si METHANE COLLECTION SYSTEM 170 s0 ITS s0 $70 99 0403-01 7 (N) MAINTENANCE SULDING SO 1911 115 $0 699 990003-06 3 (N) MISCELLANEOUS DUMPSTERS s0 S1S s16 $0 $15 994003-09 7 101 BUFFER ZONE $200 60 6200 so $200 TOTAL 1196.1999 SW DISPOSAL 270 112 432 0 432 • 99-010441 9 ;I) RECYCLING SITE IMPROVEMENTS s0 $5 $S V. SS $9-0104-02 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT SO $2 62 So $2 99-0104-03 1 (G) ADOIEXPANO RECYCLING SITE$ s0 H 65 so $S 09-0804-KC / (G) INTERMEDIATE PROCESSING CENTER DESIGN 1144 s0 61" s0 $144 TOTAL 1991-1999 SOLIO WASTE SW RECYCLING 11 $12 156 0 156 TOTAL 1994.1999 SOLID WASTE $411 449 6463 0 863 e • rat 36 I I I I I f I 1 I I I I I I ! I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 7 . 32X 0 ' I :_s ! :1 I I :I I i I i I i 1 I :I 1998-2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SOLID WASTE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL [NUMBI ROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT CITY A104N FISCAL YEAR ROA PROJECT NAME COST FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST 00-0600-01 1 (1) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 60 S2 62 60 $2 TOTAL 1099.2000 SOLID WASTE SW ADMINISTRATION 60 $2 2 60 $2 00-0801-01 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT SO 62 12 SO 62 TOTAL 1999-2000 SOLID WASTE SW RESIDENTIAL 0 $2 62 60 62 004802-01 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 60 63 13 $O 13 004302-02 3 (NIR) MISCELLANEOUS DUMPSTER3 60 6170 6170 6o 9170 004602-03 3 (R) OUMPSTER SCREENING SO 66 65 60 $1 00-0602-07 S (N) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION 0 650 650 60 _ 650 1 TOTAL 1996.000 SOLID WASTE SW COMMERCIAL 90 6228 6228 6226 00-060341 1 (RI MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE FURNITURE 90 $2 62 60 62 j 00.0803L0 7 (G) PHASE 2A LANDFILL CONSTRUCTION 6200 60 6200 60 6200 { 00460343 10 (1) PUBLIC DISPOSAL AREA 90 $39 635 I9 635 r 00.0803-04 10 (q PARKING LOT SAPROVEMENT6 $0 630 130 60 630 { 00480345 7 (0) PURCKASE A NEW SCALE 660 SO 160 60 160 00-06031(0 2 (S) METHANE COLLECTION SYSTEM 6630 60 6430 W 6630 TOTAL 1906.2000 SOLID WASTE SW DISPOSAL 690 67 9SJ 0 057 00-0806-01 9 (q RECYCLING SITE IMPROVEMENTS 60 610 S10 60 610 00-080142 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 16 63 63 60 63 004604-03 I (0) ADWEXPAND RECYCLING SITES 60 629 125 SO 62S 004801K01 I (N) INTERMEDIATE PROCESSWO CENTER 61,064 SO 31,058 60 61,066 004101-06 3 1N) RECYCLING CONTAINERS 60 1100 6100 64 6100 TOTAL 19992000 SOLID WASTE SW RECYCLING $1,014 1 ,191 ,164 I TOTAL 19992200 SOLID WASTE 1,646 6437 ,38 0 2,393 i i i f 37 0 I i 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SOLID WASTE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL - PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT CITY AID4N FISCAL YEAR NUMBER GA PROJECT NAME COST FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST 01-0600-01 1 (1) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 60 12 82 60 67 01-0600-02 6 (N) SOLID WASTE OFFICE CONSOLIDATION 60 625 826 60 876 TOTAL 2000.2001 SOLID WASTE SW ADMINISTRATION 80 27 821 0 27 01-0601-01 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OfFFICE EQUIPMENT 80 83 $3 60 63 01-0001-02 4 (N) SOLID WASTE OFFICE CONSOLIDATION _ 60 666 660 80 866 TOTAL 2000.2001 SOLID WASTE SW RESIDENTIAL 80 " 68 80 866 01480244 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT 60 63 83 60 63 01480242 3 (WR) MISCELLANEOUS DUMPSTERS 80 8176 6173 60 8176 01-060243 7 Ill DUMPSTERSCREENMO 86 86 86 6J 65 01-060244 8 IN) SOLID WASTE OFFICE CONSOLIDATION 60 US 865 60 866 01-0802-01 S (N) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION 0 880 ISO 60 840 TOTAL 20W2001 SOLID WASTE SW COMMERCIAL 5286 11290 0 8288 01-0803-01 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE FURNITURE 80 82 62 60 62 01,0603-02 2 IN) HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL STORAGE N 810 NO 60 610 01,1140343 3 IN)MtSCELLANEOUSDUMPSTERS b 646 11,111, 60 816 01403.1.06 7 (G) PHASE 2A.LANDFILL CONSTRUCTION N,"o 80 _ $6,500 80 61,600 TOTAL 2000-2001301.10 WASTE SW DISPOSAL 1,600 r 1,627 81,62? 01-060141 0 (1) RECYCLING SITE IMPROVEMENTS 60 818 618 60 618 01410442 1 (R) M;%CELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 60 82 62 W 87 01480443 4 (N) SOLI) WASTE OFFICE CONSOLIDATION 60 828 625 60 826 TOTAL 2000.2001 SOLID WASTE SW RECYCLING 0 142 2 to 942 • TOTAL 2000.2001 SOLID WASTE 1,600 1,1411 111.11412 N,"2 1 s • I 38 I I I I ~ I I ~ I f I %'°1 I ''1 I I I f I 1 ! I! 1 1 9 1 5'K 3 2 x IQ LIEU 1 1 fF , 1 ~ , f f1 ~ f i V I r I r 1 ~ • 1 I I 1 f I I:~ I ,:9 k _1 f I I I ;.i i I I l f J l J ~ E l i l I I i 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SOLD WASTE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL PROJECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT CM IN FISCAL ARI T NAME Alp LIMBER GA PROJEC COST FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONlTR COST 024100-01 1 (1) MISCEL.OFF" SUPPORT EQUIPMENT f0 $2 12 f0 $2 TOTAL 20012003 SOLID WASTE SW ADMINISTRATION 0 $2 92 f0 52 024MI41 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT s0 $3 $3 $0 $3 TOTAL 2001.2002 SOLID WASTE SW RESIDENT-' 0 3 $3 $0 3 f 02490241 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT so 63 $3 $0 $3 02410242 3 (MM) MISC E LLANEOUS OUMPSTERS SO s190 $01) f0 silo w 1s $s 10 $5 OZ-004243 3 (0 DUMPSTER SCREENING 02-0102-07 8 (N) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION 0 $SO $60 s0 Ho TOTAL 2001.2002 SOLID WASTE SW COMMERCIAL $231 239 f0 231 F i i 02490341 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE FUN)VTUREEQUIPMENT s0 $2 $2 $0 $2 02480343 10 (110) LANDFILL ROAD IMPROVEMENI5 SO $30 $30 W $30 E 02480341 T (G) BUILD A SCALE HOUSE $100 $0 $100 $0 SIDI) TOTAL 2001.2002 SOLID WASTE SW 04SPOSAL 100 $32 02 0 132 02010401 9 (1) RECYCLING SITE IMPROVEMENT! f0 s10 s10 s0 SID 02010442 1 (R) MISC EL. OFF ICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT $0 $2 $2 10 $2 TOTAL 20012003 SOLID WASTE SW RECYCLING 12 12 12 TOTAL 2001.2002 SOLID WASTE slod 267 S30 0 71'~ P pi I i. i i i I• ! 39 .2,sx 32X y H 'l 1 0 ' 1 • Yli'NAI I I 1 l I f is • i 1998.2093 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SOLID WASTE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL JECT PROJECT BOND CURRENT CITY AMM FI ICAL Y NBEAOA PROJECT NAME COST FUND REVENUE FUNOING CON3TR COST j' 03410041 1 IQ KISCO L. OFFICE SUPPORTEOUIPMENT f0 62 62 60 $2_ ! TOTAL 2002.2003 SW ADMINISTRATION 60 2 62 60 03-060141 1 (R) MISCEL. OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT f0 63 63 SO 67 TOTAL 26024003 SW RESIDENTIAL 60 3 ! 3` 03460241 3 (WR) MISCELLANEOUS DUMPSTERS 60 6116 6135 SO 611! 03-030242 $ (WR) DUMPSTER SCREENING SO 68 SS 60 66 03-060243 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT SO 63 13 60 61 03-0102-07 6 (N) CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION 656 150 SO 660 TOTAL 2002.2003 SW COMMERCIAL - Ill," 241 52/5 0 621/ 03-0607-01 10 (1) LANDFILL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS SO 620 620 10 620 034603-01 1 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT 60 12 62 60 12 03-0603-03 10 p) PUBLIC DISPOSAL AREA 60 616 613 60 NS 034603-1 10 (N) SECURITY C AMERAS 60 620 620 60 120 TOTAL 2002.2003 SW DISPOSAL 0 57 657 SO S7 03460141 9 (1) RECYCLING SITE IMPROVEMENT 60 63 63 60 15 TOTAL 2002.2003 SW RECYCLING 0 6 0 T TOTAL 2002•M03 SOLI) WASTE 313 313 60 313 ii { I 40 I r I, ) ! I l I ~ + I I I I I 11 t i 16 11 i t 1 ~ I R 10 - fd , . RAN= v , s FLEET SERVICES','-.., ` r Q 1 r: r O p LI r :r Zs . r 3 N Y,r s~ c . dr d Y~ M , a A . , , r i 1 I E I V `3 f 'i f i I i i 1 _i I I :I I 1 I i I i L'_7 I 1 i_ € i E 1 _l I 1998-200 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN CASH REQUIREMENTS FLEET SERVICES (S X 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT NUMBERS" CATEO0RV 11N 2000 2001 2002 =0C$lOtAi. 1 COMPUTERIPRINTER EQUIPMENT SO $42 SO SO so $42 2 OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 4 3 3 5 2 17 3 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 2 0 0 0 0 2 4 TOOLS AND EOUIPMENT 25 3 9 6 10 53 5 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE S 0 0 0 0 0 0 FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS S7,D00 SO 0 0 0 1,000 TOTALS: $1,031 141 112 111 612 $1,122 BOND FUND so so so $0 SO SO CURRENT REVENUE 18 48 12 11 12 101 AID•INCONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER 1,021 0 0 0 0 1,021 TOTALS: $1,0311 $41 S52 $11 W 11,122 "GROUP ASSIGNMENT (GA) NUMBERS are used for identif"Wn o(CIP Projects by major category of expense L"ENM . (G) GROWTH (N) NEW EDVIPMENT (S) STATUTORY (1) IMPROVED SERVICE (R) REPLACEMENT (T)TFCHNOLOGY r } 1 Vol 41 JJ r r. 25 i f I r r is r 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ` FLEET SERVICES ' TOTAL TOTAL + PROJECT SONG CURRENT CITY A10-IN OTHER PROJECT + NUMBER OA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST + 19-0650-01 6 (H) CONSTRUCT NEW FLEET SERVICE CENTER 10 W 61A00 f0 11,000 11,000 E M-0610-02 4 (R) SPECIALTY TOOLS 0 4 4 0 0 4 01114660-03 2 (0)OFFICEFURNITME 0 2 2 0 0 2 914660-04 4 (N) MOStIE MACHINERYMOUIPMENT 0 0 21 0 B 21 91-0660-06 3 (0) EMERGENCY EYEWASH SHOWERSISTATIONS 0 2 2 0 0 2 19-066040 6 (T) EMISSION CONTROL EQUIPMENT 0 / 1 0 0 1 TOTAL 1116.1999 FLEET SERVICES • VEHICLE MAINT, 10 611 11,037 10 11,071 11,037 M-0663-01 2 (G) OFFICE FURNITURE 10 63 12 10 10 12 TOTAL 1M1.11 IS FLEET SERVICES - PARTS S FUEL It 2 $2 60 0 02 TOTAL 1M .1M1 FLEET SERVICES 10 611 1,039 60 61,071 61,039 I : 1. ' 41 I i s ~ i t I { I i I f 1 l i 1 1 A l 0 E ~~F`~, +tc."'~ 25 x ❑ 32 x 1 r~ L v• f C 1 r '1998-2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FLEET SERVICES TOTAL TOTAL IPN ROJECT BOND CURRENT CITY AID-IN OTHER PROJECT U MBER GA PROJECTNAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST 00-0660-01 2 (0) OFFICE FURNITURE 90 63 63 f0 90 57 004660-02 i (R) SPECIALTY TOOLS 0 3 3 0 0 3 TOTAL IM-00 FLEET SERVICES • VEHICLE MAINT. 60 $9 36 60 60 S6 004667-01 1 (01 PRINTER/SCANNERIFAX MACHINE to 111 82 so so $2 00-0663-02 1 (T) AUTOMATED INVENTORY SYSTEM AND BAR CODE SCANNERS 0 60 60 0 0 40 TOTAL 1!99.2000 FLEET SERVICES -PARTS & FUEL 90 642 642 $0 90 6~2 TOTAL 1999.2000 FLEET SERVICES 30 6418 $411 so $0 a I r f,r~ ,t i 43 10 15 x f t` li r s.. r i r r- I} ry 1 \Y~ ~ i - ` r 1 ;r r } 1998.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN r r FLEET SERVICES C i TOTAL =CC Fwml OJECT BONG CUPRENT CITY AID-IN OTHER PROJECT } ERGA PROJECT NAME FUNO REVENUE FUNOINO CONSTR COST i r 014n1041 2 {0} OFFICE FURNITURE SO $3 $3 SO SO SS 01-0610-02 i (R)SPECIALTYTOOLS 0 A 1 0 0 1 TOTAL 2OW2001 FLEET SERVICES - VEHICLE MAINT, SO $T iT SO 10 ST 01-061341 / (G) PARTS WVENTORY SHELVING SYSTEM SO S6 S/ SQ SO $S TOTAL 2000-2001 FLEET SERVICES • PARTS i fUEL SO SS SI SO $0 S6 TOTAL 2000-2001 FLEET SERVICES Sd N2 12 0 SO $12 44 I I I I II I i I I "t t' t f 1 11 1 1 1 1 i! i f t! ~ v"t 5x10 gip. 32XILI R1 Y I I ( 1_ I 7 I f l! _.i I ..J f{ 1 .l 11 I .t i_/ f J 11 L 1 ! I ( k 1999.2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FLEET SERVICES TOTAL TOTAL PROJECT BOND CURRENT CITY A104N OTHER PROJECT NUMBER GA PROJECT NAME FUND REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST 024660-01 2 101 OFFICE FURNITURE 60 63 63 66 60 63 02-0660-02 6 (RI SPECIALTY TOOLS 0 1 1 0 0 6 TOTAL 2001.2002 FLEET SERVICES • VEHICLE MAINT. 60 it 69 60 60 it 02-0663-01 2 (R) OFFICE FURNITURE 60 62 62 10 60 62 TOTAL 20014002 FLEET SERVICES • PARTS A FUEL 60 62 62 60 60 62 TOTAL 2001.2002 FLEET SERVICES 60 611 11 60 60 611 ,r r i 45 I' JOY t 25 „ I a 32 x 10 slop~ ;lam,,. , 4 4 1 I i 1998.2009 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FLEET SERVICES TOTAL TOTAL PROJECT BOND CURRENT CITY AWN OTHER PROJECT NUMBER flA PROJECTNAME MD~ REVENUE FUNDING CONSTR COST " 07-0670-01 4 (R) SPECIALTY/Oi OHMIC TOOLS 10 110 NO 10 i0 510 TOTAL 2007.2007 FLEET SERVICES • VEHICLE MAINT. 10 10 110 f0 10 110 02-065741 7 (O)OFi ICE FURNITURE SO 12 12 10 SO /2 TOTAL 2002.2007 FLEET SERVICES • PARTS 6 FUEL 10 12 12 10 10 2 TOTAL2002.2003 FLEETSERVICES 0 12 12 0 12 ~I I 'j I I i • i i 46 I I I I(( ; ( ~ I 1 I~ I, ~ I t I I I ~ 1 !R l! If "'1' 10 L 11-1 .4 32 x1o 0 1 '~iA6k7b:V Age,Aa No. Y -OZ2- AGENDAINFURMATIUNSHEET Agxrdaftdn) WWS-..~..~~r AGENDA DATE: Jnne 9, 1998 Oahe k - 4 - 9 R DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development Department CM/DCMIACM: Rick Svehla i SUBJECT Receive a report, hold a discussion, and provide direction to staff regarding the interim Corridor Ordinance BACKGROUND In January 1998, the City Council directed staff to prepare a corridor ordinance to implement regulations to enhance and improve the appearance and safety of corridors. The preliminary approach was presented to the City Council in a work session on April 28. Based on comments from the meeting, staff reduced the number of corridor classifications from three to two: Gateways and Entranceways, and eliminated Mayhill Road and Lakeview Blvd, from the ordinance. The US Highway 380 designation was changed to Gateway, and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended increasing the section covered to include Primrose Street west to the city limits and Ruddell Street east to the city limits. Overall regulations related to setbacks, architectural materials, architectural design, uses visible from the corridor, signs, and nor,-conforming landscaping are recommended. Internal corridors will be addressed as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that roads be reviewed separately, after adoption of the interim ordinance and completion of Comprehensive Plan, to determine if specific policies and ordinances for the road segment should be adopted. These roads have more existing development, and a case by case review would provide an opportunity to address the issues related to each road. During t';e Planning and Zoning Commission work session, the Commission stated the need for a plan for public improvements along corridors to enhance the corridors. In 1987, the City Council instituted a process to apply for TXDOT matching funds as TXDOT road projects are proposed. The matching grant process was used to install landscaping on Teasley Lane (FM 2181) and University Drive (US highway 380). Elements of a public improvement plan for -fight-of-way may include landscaping of right-ofways and medians, TXDOT logo signs, maintenance of roadway areas, directional signs, lighting, and sidewalks. f i 3 In regard to nonconfonning properties, the interim ordinance recommends perimeter parking lot I • plantings along all dc,rRnated corridors by 2003. The Legal Department has inserted an appeal process that would allow until 2008 for compliance, The City Courcii could allow the landscaping to be insrallcd in the parkway or the area between the property line and she edge of the roadway. Staff recommends that planting in the parkway be permitted if the City develops a landscape project for the corridor, The plan may be developed as part of a Small Area Plan or as part of an improvement plan for the area. As part of the plan, the property owner could participate in the project and complete the perimeter planting in the parkway. All landscape plans in the parkway would require review by the 0 Development Review Committee with consultation with the TXDOT Resident Engineer and the City of p Denton Department of Transportation and Engineering, Nonconforming land uses and amortization is not a part of this proposed ordinance but is addressed in Sec. 35.48 of the Code of Ordinances. A copy of the ordinance is the last attachment in our packet. ><IC_ 32X • r As reported during the June 2 public hearing, Terry Morgan has advised us to provide notice under Local Government Chapter 211. Section 211.007 provides two options for notification. First, Sec. 211.007 (c) states a written notice "shall be sent to each owner, as indicated by the most recently approved municipal tax roll, of real property within 200 feet of the property on which the change in classification is proposed. The notice maybe served by its deposit in the municipality, properly addressed with postage paid, in the United States mail." The notice must be provided before the IOu , day before the Commission hearing. Our initial research indicates the number of notices would be over 2,400. In order to comply with this provision, notice would be mailed by June 26 and a second hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission would be held on July 8. Section 211.006(a) requires notice of a public hearing be published in an official newspaper before the 151h day before the date of the City Council hearing. The newspaper advertisement would be provided on July 5, 1998 for the City Council July 21 public hearing. The second notification option requires that the City Council by ordinance set 3 joint public hearing of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and this allows the City Council to set a different notification requirement. [Local Government Code 211.007 (b) anC (d)] Local Government Code Section 211.007(d) states, "The go~eming body of a home-rule municipality may, by a two-thirds vote, prescribe the type of notice to be given of the time and place of a public hearing held jointly by the governing body and the zoning commission, If notice requirements are prescribed under this subsection, a the notice requirements prescribed by 211.007(b), 211.007(c) (quoted above) and by Section 211.06(a) (quoted above] do not apply." Section 211.007(b) still requires that the Commission make a i recommendation before the governing body may take action. In this option the Commission would make a recommendation during thejoint meeting and then the City Council would vote. In the second option, the written notice and the Chapter 211.006(a) newspaper notice would not be required. If Council votes to proceed with option two, staff recommends an extensive notification process including notice in the newspaper, a utility insert, and notice on Marcus Cable Channel 25 and 26 bulletin boards. Other notification options could include notice to the Chamber of Commerce mail list, which includes approximately 1,112. The goal of the alternative notice would be to provide more effective communication on a broader scale but would eliminate the difficulty and staff time in preparing an accurate mail list of the approximately 2,400 parcel owners by June 26. The completion of the mail list is critical in maintaining the revised schedule for City Council action on July 2 L ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT The remaining schedule will depend on the City Council determination on the notice, Option one: public notice would be mailed by June 26, a Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing would be held on July 8, and the City Council public hearing would be scheduled for July 21. Option two: City Council action on June 16 to prescribe the public notice, public notice to begin June 21, and ajoint public hearing with the City Council and Planning and Zoning • Commission on July 21. PRIOR ACTIO~-IlREV1EW (Council. Boards. Commisslens The City Council held a public hearing on June 2, 1998, At the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on May 27, the Commission recommended approval by a vote of 4.1. The staff met with the Denton Chamber of Commerce on Friday, May 29 and will report comments from the meeting at the June 2 public hearing. A complete schedule is enclosed. The V;-!on for the 21" Century Live Team recommended that a, corridor study be • completed to promote economic development and the quality of life in Denton. The Live Team p r♦ recommended using "signature plant materials" and building materials from the Courthouse on the Square to create repealing drrign elements throughout the city. This is demonstrated in the selection of materials for the entrance mbAcrs. 2 • 5 x 10 32x1a i 4 , O , FISCAL. INF RAIATION Additional staff review will be required but not specific fiscal impact is anticipated at this time. The enhancement of public right of way, as a companion component to the corridor ordinance, will require a financial commitment but a recommendation on the public enhancement is not being proposed at this time. Re subrted: + !ti David Hill Director of Planning and Development Prepared by: UCA U l~.h.ayv~~ i1 Cecile Carson Small Area Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: I -Schedule (page 4) 2 - Map (page 5) 3 • Draft Ordinance and Exhibit A (pages 6.13) 4 - Traffic Counts (page 14) 5 - Summary by Topic (page 15.74) 6 - Summary by City (page 75.88) 7 - Zoning Ordinance provisions on non-conforming uses (page 89.92) 8 - Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of May 27,1998 (page 93 -98) " , . .f if l 1 3 0 _ S ~ nor:. Y I .r ,~Yt t. arm 32 VOW O ' ^L r k J; i '~1~ r e~ s' 1 ~ l= l I ~.4N"i\`R.'4Mwl.v~.w. ,n ark. ~,u,-`W'c•'w,er",r+M•lv1eY,..~,.l.,:.ewvsaucnem:rew s..,, V{{Mra. M.wHw'I+mwn~ lw:: ~ • ! Ir ATTACHMENT I Corridor Ordinance Schedule As approved by City Council January 1998 February-March Research r Contact TXDOT about traffic counts and public enhancements Discussions with Building Inspections, Code Enforcement, and other City departments March-April Draft proposal Review proposal with Vision Committee April/May Complete ordinance and submit to legal ` April 28 City Council Work Session May 13 Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session r # , May Potential meeting with the Vision for the 21" CenturyCabinet and'or Live Team May 27 Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing and recommendation May 20 Meeting with Chamber of Commerce June 2 City Council Public Hearing June 9 City Council Work Session June 16 City Council meeting to adopt alternative notification ordinance June 17-July 21 Newspaper advertising, utility inserts, and other notification of proposed .rrdinance July 21 City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing , Ordinance adoption proposed ya h t ~f : 1 1 ~r e ~h 1 ;~k ry 1 r, I .P v +i~ f tly A4 9 r I I I r - - 1 } l I I } l- J u I I s, c9 d 4 - a I NIIM 71 ~ I i ~ I ~ r, 3• 1 a 1 i 0 ~ Ott S f 11 a~ %low _ fn r ~ ~ I 32 x „J rj' , t l~l L ,~Y,~ b"N µ e I ATTACHMENT 3 i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 35 "ZONING" CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON BY ADOPTING ARTICLE XI "CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT"; PROVIDING A CLASSIFICATION FOR DESIGNATING ROADWAYS IN DENTON; ESTABLISHING A MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACK ALONG DESIGNATED ROADWAYS; PROVIDING ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR DESIGNATED ROADWAYS; ESTABLISHING SCREENING REQUIREMENTS FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT, VEHICLE SERVICE BAYS, LOADING DOCKS, AND OUTSIDE STORAGE OF MERCHANDISE; LIMITING THE VISIBILITY OF CERTAIN USES ALONG DFSIGNATED ROADWAYS; REQUIRING TRAFFIC CsRCULATION PLANS FOR PROPERTIES THAT ACCESS THE DESIGNATED ROADWAYS; AND PROVIDING FOR NON-CONFORMING LANDSCAPING; PROVIDING FOR CREATION OF SIGN DISTRICTS; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Denton City Council has determined that our corridors impact the visual image of our community; and WHEREAS, the Vision for the 21" Century project identified entranceways as a component of the vision for Dent^n as a great place to live, work, learn and play; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the public interest to insure that new developments in Denton will help to enhance the economic and aesthetic environment; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton recognizes that the establishment of new rules and regulations through an overlay district for architectural standards, setbacks, screening of uses, prohibition of certain uses if visible from the corridor and traffic circulation will help to enhance the economic and aesthetic environment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted public hearings on the proposed regulations contained herein NOW THEREFORE 1 • THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTIQN 1. That Chapter 35 "Zoning" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Dentin, Texas is heteby amended by the adoption of Title XI, entitled "Corridor Overlay District," so that hereafter said tide shall be and read as follows: i Draft June 9, 1998 6 Revised from June 2, 1998 Corridor Overtay District Ordinance w YYr! it s , • o ARTICLE X1. CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT Sec. 35-411. Short Title and Scope. This article shall be known and may be cited as the Corridor Overlcy District. This article is creating a new district that overlays current districts and that except where they conflict with this article all rules and regulation of the underlying district shall still have full force and effect. Sec. 35-412. Stelernent of Purpose. The intent of this article is to promote the immediate and long-term public health, safely, economic stability and general welfare of the citizens of Denton by establishing regulations related to access and appearance of designated roadways. This article is intended to promote the following general purposes: l) To provide a visually attractive environment for those who travel through the City in automobiles buses, other motorized vehicles, non-motorized vehicles or on foot. 2) To combine the plant materials and person-made structures to visually soften the built environment, cleanse the air, and reduce the heat effect of pavement. ; 3) To establish a character or theme for Denton that is visible along its corridor. I i 4) To design and locate streetscape amenities that are visually pleasing but avoid conflicts with driver sight visibility triangles end utilities. 1 5) To preserve the Cross Timbers lerrain and to enhance the grand prairie. 1 6) To create a distinctive sense of arrival to Denton. 7) To address issues facing corridor users including motorists, transit, cyclists, pedestrians in order to create a safe and efficient transportation system. " I 8) To communicate a sense of order and safely to motorist and pedestrians through 4 development of landscape design, access plans and structural treatments. 9) To retain and enhance land value by restricting incompatible uses and creating a sense 1 of visual unity along corridors. ' 10) To market Denton as a unique and identifiable city for economic development, r Sec. 35.413, C•lasslllcations. 0 ' 1) Galewreys: The Gateway designation is reserved for the roadways with the highest volume of traffic and provides limited direct access, Roads designated as Gateways Draft )one 9, 1998 7 Re% tvd from June 2, 1998 Corridor 0%crlay District Ordinance 10 32XIO s 0 include: 1-35 N, 1-35 W,1-35 E, Loop 288, U.S. Highway 380 from Primrose Street west to the city limits and U.S. Highway 380 from Ruddell Street east to the city limits. Along Gateways, maximum efforts will be taken to preserve natural features including trees, native vegetation, and views. Regulations shall be applied to property within a 500 foot wide ship on each side of the roadway measured from the centerline of the roadway, ;nd the regulations shall apply to the entire property whether all or part of the property is located within the total 1,000-foot wide strip. II 2) Entranceways: Entranceways are classified as primary or secondary arterials and may have curb and gutter or barrow ditch or swales along the right-of-way. Entranceways shall include: US Hwy 77 from 1.35N to Windsor Dr., Teasley Lane (FM 2181), Fort Worth Drive (US Highway 377) from 1.35 E south to the city limits, Locust Streit (FM 2164) from Loop 288 north to the city limits, McKinney Street (FM 426) from Loop 288 east to the city limits, and Sherman Drive (FM 428) from Loop 288 north to the city limits. Regulations shall be applied to all property located within 250 feet from the centerline of the roadway and the regulations shall apply to the entire property whether all or part of the property is located within the 500-foot wide strip. 3) City limits: The regulations shall apply to property along the designated roadway that is within the city limits. As annexation occurs along the designated roadways the regulations shall apply to the area annexed. Sec. 35-414. Setback Requirements, 1) General provision: Driveway accesses and a sign in compliance with the city of j Denton Sign Ordinance may be located in the setback area. All provisions of the Landscape Ordinance 98.100 shall apply. In determining the landscape and tree, requirements for the setback, a calculation of the land area in the setbacu: in comp?rison to the overall land area shall be made. Landscaping requirements and trees shall be installed in the setback in an equal per"riage of the land area; for example if the setback is I osi, of the overall property then 101/9 of the tree and landscape requirements must be i - installed in the setback. 2) Gatewrys: A 25-foot minimum landse..pe setback measured from the property line is ' required. Within the area, all existing trees shall be preserved. Native vegetation shall be • undisturbed in the area of existing trees. No parking shall be pennitted within the 25- foot setback. 3) Entranceways: A 15-foot minimum landscape setback measured from the property line is required. Within the area, all existing trees shall be preserved. , Native vegetation shall be undisturbed in the area of existing trees. No parking shall be permitted in the setback, • O Sec. 35-415. Arch hectura! Standards. a 1) Materials: The exterior walls of the building visible from the designated street shall be comprised of stone, cast stone, stucco, brick, limestone, granite or a similar appearing Dr an June 9, 1998 8 Revised from June 2, 1998 i Corridor Overlay District Ordinance r 32x10 0 "v~nexn I Q I +wsess f natural or created masonry material. A maximum of 100/6 of the building facade visible from the designated strerf may be comprised of "split face" concrete block. Glass including windows and doors shall be limited to no more than 50% of the front building facade visible from the designated street and no less than 20%. The exterior glass shall have a maximum reflectance of 20%. An alternative building material consistent with the appearance of the materials listed above may be approved upon recommendation of the Building Official to the Director of Planning. 2) Colors: Neon and fluorescent wall colors are specifically prohibited on all building faces visible from a designated gateway or entranceway. 3) Design: The design of each stracture shall include relief to front wall and roofline. No single uninterrupted surface plane shall be permitted. Reference Exhibit A, Building ArticulaL on. Sec.35-416. Screening. 1) Mechanical equipment: Mechanical equipment including satellite dishes must be visually screened from view from the designated roadway and from adjacent residential zones or uses. Roof-mounted equipment shall be integrated into the building design and screened from view from the designated roadways, 2) Veblcle service bays and loading docks: All vehicle repair, service, and maintenance bays and all loading docks shall be arranged or screened so that the bay(s) or dock is not visible from the designated roadways or adjacent residential zones or uses. All screening provisions of Ordinance 98-100 shall apply. 3) Limited visibility uses: The following uses shall be prohibited from being visit e from the designated com.or. These uses are permitted if screened by vegetation, masonry walls, or similar solid construction, or by design within a building, in addition to the required setback, so that the use is not visible in any manner from the designated roadway or adjacent residential zones or uses. Primary Residential Uses Trailcr Camp or Mobile Home Park ! Educational, Institutional and Special Uses Correctional Facility 1 Utility, Accessory and Incidental Uses Electric Generating Plant 1 Electric Substation ! Electrical Transmission Line ! ! Private Utility Shop cr Storage Yard Publ,c Building, Shop, Yard of Local, State. or Federal Government y Sewage Primping Station Dian June 9, 1998 9 Re% ised from June 2, 1998 Corridor Oserlay District Ordinance 10 32 X I O • 0 a~nsa a r Sewage Treatment Plant g' Telephone Line and Exchange Switching or Relay S,a:ion Water Pumpinb S ation or Well Water Treatment Plant ' Drag Strip or Commercial Racing Fairground or Exhibition Area Go-Cart Track SexualIy Oriented Business i , Transportation Related Uses Hauling or Storage Company Motor Freight Terminal Railroad Freight Terminal Railroad Passenger Station Parking Lot Truck ' Automobile Service Uses Auto Wrecking or Salvage Yard Tire Retread;ng or Capping ; Retail and Service Type Uses Household Appliance Service and Repair (Outside) Secondhand Ctore, Used Furniture or Rummage Sale Tool or Trailer Rental Agrlceiturai Type Uses Hatchery, Poultry Livestock Auction Uveslock Feeding Plant, Pens, or Yards Commtrelal Type Uses t Contractors Shop and Storage Yard Heavy Machinery Sales and Storage I t Petroleum Products Storab: •Wltolesale Storage and Sales of Fumibare or Appliances Outside A Building 0 Trailer Rental or sales i Natural Resource Storage and Extraction Petroleum Collecting or Storage Facilities I r" N' i . Speciallndustria! Processes Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plant 0 Brick Kiln or Tile Plant 0 I ' j1V' Cement or Hydrattd Lime Manufacture Dump or San'iary Fill Area i Mixing or:iale of Concrete Draft June 9, 1999 t V + Revised from June 2, 1998 a Corridor 0% May District Ordini.-c } ; ? K ~ ri 32X MAIN ,a A s o r w Open Salvage Yard for Rags or Machinery etc. Smelter or Refinery 4) Outs'.ae storage and storage or merchandise outside: All business operations and activities shall be conducted within an enclosed building. The only exceptions for outside activity shall be off-street parking or loading; drive-in or drive-through windows at financial institutions, restaurants, prescription pharmacy or dry cleaners, and outside eating in conjunction with a restaurant, No merchandise other than vehicles located on a lot used primarily for the sale of vehicles or living materials such as Christmas trees, pumpkins and flowers may be visible from the designated i roadway or adjacent residential zones or uses. Merchandise may be placed outside if screened by solid vegetation at the time of planting as per':zrdinance 9e-100, or by a minimum 8-toot masonry or similar solid construction wall so that the merchandise is not visible from the designated roadway or from adjacent residential zones or uses. Sec. 35-417, Traffic Circulation Plan. A trafii^ circulation plan shall be prepared and provided for all new devel(,pment. This plan should allow a safe and efficient flow of traffic in'out of property to maximize the capacity of the roauway. Access management design features will allow the congestion of the adjacent roadways to 'A minimized. Examples of access management include corner clearances, driveway spacing, joint access driveways and parallel access roads. The Traffic Circulation Plan should provide detailed information showing how the development will minimize transportation impacts while providing the necest ry business connection to the Entranceway Corridor. :he plan shall be reviewed by the city of Denton Engineering Department for compliance with all Subdivision Regulations. See. 35-418. Nun-Conforming Properties. 1) Landscaping: All legal non-conforming properties within the designated corridor shall provide landscaping by October 1, 2003. The minimum requirement shall be compliance with Sec.31.7(I)(a) Parking Lot Screening, perimeter screening and Sce.31.8(Ordinance 98.100). 2) Redevelopment: In the event of demolition of an existing legal non-conforming use, • all requirements of this code shall be met In accordance with provisions of Code of Ordinances, Sec. 35.13(d), all requirements of this cod; shall apply if partial destruction exceeds 50016. 3) Appeal: AlLlceal non-conformjng properties within it designated corridor shall tonrplyyllhthe perimeter scrccninst requirements for parking lots a.dained in Code of Ordinmes. Sec 31.70)(a) by October I. 2003, The owner of a legal non- ; • LQakralin¢ property play appeal for relief to the Board of Adjustment to determine a 0 • later cogioliance date. In due ding whether to get relief to the owner based upon vich it peal. the Board of &ustmentshall t No consideration the factors set firth in Code of Ordinances- Sec. 35.48(b). but jn no event all such compliance slate be extended beyond October 1. _QM Draft line 9, 199,9 11 Revised frorn Jun: 7, 1998 Corridor Os c r la y D i strict Ordinance 32 x o (r d r f I &Sam 0 , I f Sec. 35419. Signs. A sign district shall be required for any property which has more than three hundred (300) feel of continuous frontage on a Gateway or Entranceway. The plan shall conform + to the provisions of Code of Ordinances, Sec. 33.254(2). All signs in the sign district 1 must be designed to conform to regulations in Code of Ordinances, Chapter 33 as presently enacted or as hereinafter amended. SECTION IL That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon convi. tion, be fined a sum not exceeding S2,000.00. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is viol•Ired shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. f. a (L r?N UL That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not effect the validity of the remaining F portions of this crdinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby dr;cia,vs it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such validity. SECTION IV, That save and except as amended hereby, all the provisions, sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of Chapter 35 of the Code of Ordinances shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION V. That this ore inance shall become effective fourteen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this urdinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-chronicle, a daily newspaper published in the City of Derlon, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1998. JACK MILLER, MAYOR ATTEST: • JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY t' I~ .r APPROVED AS rO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT'.. PROUC,7Y, CITY ATTORNEY ♦ • u } c ~ 1 BY: Draft tune 9, 1998 12 Revised from lune 2, 1998 , Corridor Overlay District 0rdinance l';ot~t , x 32 x.0 25 10 ARM= 0 oMmowr EXHIBIT A BUILDING ARTICULATION H - Height of building MHFL - Maximum horizontal facade length MVFL ■ Maximum vertical facade length MHOL - Minimum horizontal offset length "w p3 p 4 - - P MVOL - Minimum vertical offset length 4 I, ! f I'~ I l~lU low.-aIt(f I MNOL • (MM) tiLFS Ft. ~ 2Sfi of nuaLamn ler~ar of ei7er aljaeeat ptra ISOMETRIC OF HORMONTAL ARTICULATION /MVFL . 7f 1G of rJ is .~4s teu (1 of eib:r al,aa~. pLoe , i.iY0L. l7t( I'yj, f"~I yItjI Hh~ Rio ~ ~ M,~r,~~ ~ I' I,I~ y •YSy .l~t&4~ Ltl 4 yT~i t 4a!'Lil 4'FA iy ,l~ i P9', Ii 't P a r. X14 X41! ' 1; k~ w} 'lL ' ,L1 ° t r. N-i.~`:~'~ ~ r I I i 1 I ~i a~ F ~ '~9t ''E~' ~4f IW"~~, I r~ I'~sZ, ' ~6s 'w' F; t'!ri tip I M r 6 t ~ 'M g-I Y~ C gjl~.1 f1 .l 1 1 e ~'.5NT ~i 4 ,IiJ y~ j rll~l li il~ll~`~~ 1 PLAN VIFW-HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION ELEVATION•VERTiCALA_RTICULATIO\ I i ~ jo, ]3, 25 x r~~ i 0 ATTACHMENT 4 CORRIDOR TRJAFFIC COUNTS 1990 DIstrictTraffic Map Y 1.35 N Corridor US 377 1.35 N Interchange to Hwy, 360 45,000 Collins 1o Eagle 22,758 1.35 N Hwy. 388 to Loop 288 33,000 Eagle to W. Oak 26,938 Loop 288 to FM 3163 '0.000 Country Club Rd. S to City Limits 4,800 E f-35 W Corridor Sherman Dr, Hwy, 2449 to Interchange 20,000 Loop 288 to North City Limits 7,948 1.35 E Corridor McKinney St. Loop 268 to South City Limits 80,000 loop 288 east to City Limits 11,279 Hwy 77 to FM 2181 62,000 2161 to Hwy 371 67,000 MayhlT1 Road 3034 Hwy 377 to interchange 43,000 Loop 288 Corridor Fm 2164 North to City Limits 2500 FM 2164 to 428 8,600 428 to Hwy 380 10,200 Hwy 380 to 426 19,200 1997 Traffic Count 1 City of Denton 426 W to Loop 288 10,000 426 to 1.35 E 19,200 Major Intersections Hwy 390 Corridor 1.35 E at Llllian Miler 20,998 135 E at Teasley 14,564 W'e3t from 1.35 in C?!y l im is 14,700 South of 135 E at Hwy, 371 19,667 at 1-35 E 16,600 North at 1.35 E at Hwy 371 26,299 1.35 E to Hwy 377 22,000 1.35 E at McCormick 14,298 Carroll Blvd. To Bell 25,672 1-35 N at Hwy. 380 13,811 Bell Ave. to Ruddell 25,294 Hwy. 380 at Bonnle Brae 17,415 at FM 2164 21,000 Hwy. 380 at Malone 23,908 42 o Loop 248 28,100 Hwy. 380 at Carroll 18,873 East from Loop 288 to City Limits 25,225 Hwy. 380 at Nottingham 22,317 Hwy 380 sit Old North 21,126 Hwy 77 Corridor Hwy. 380 W of Loop 288 18,647 j Hwy. 380 E of Loop 288 25,225 1.35 E to FM 2181 17,500 Loop 288 at FM 426 17,279 r FM 2181 to 426 13,600 Loop 288 N of Colorado 25,928 1.35 N to Windsor Dr, 8675 Loop 288 S of Colorado 29,100 Mayh111 Rd, at FM 426 18,869 • Oak J Hickory Corridor Carroll Blvd. At Pearl 29,983 JV Hickory at Bonnie Brae 10,509 Carroll Blvd. At Parkway 26,863 Oak at Carroll Blvd. 23,961 Carroll Blvd. Al Cresent 22,103 1 •lk at Bonnie Brae 9878 14. 32 x I❑ [ 1 rl 1 I' j svsa " , ATTACHMENT 5 f i it ~ 1 { r 1 L ~ h ~ l~ 1 j 111 r+ CORRIDOR STUDY SUMMARIES 1 a r r l rPi:r x ,r ' k ,e?a w ! S ' r 15. a 2 f) Awl 32X t [a MIKI~,11-W.AKA MAR J~XRMMUUM • r~ > CITY COMPARISON SUMMARY - BY TOPIC Landscape Setback Addison. Tens s In all districts a twenty foot (20') landscape buffer strip must be provided siong the entire length of the portion of the perimeter of the lot where a public or private street exist, exclusive of driveways and access ways at points of ingress or egress to and from the lot. The property shall be responsible for landscaping, irrigation, and maintenance of any R,O.W area between the pruverty be and the curb line, e Town R.O. W should be included in the twenty foot (20') buffer and will reduce the amount of required landscaping ores of the lot by that amount (squire foot for square foot) a The minimum requirement for R.O, W. landscaping shall be one (1) 4 inch caliper shade tree and eight (8) shrubs for each twenty (20) Iinear feet of frontage. plant material planted in the street landscape buffer strip can be massed together to create visual interest at key entry points of focal points. e One half the number of required shade trees may be satisfied on a two-to one basis with ornamental and evergreen trees. Bradford pear or other pear cultivan are considered ornamental trees under these landscape regv'. Ions. a All required screening, parking perimeter, and interior parking landscaping shall be included in the overall 20°/a of gross site landscaping. a No tree may be planted closer than two and one-half (21/2') feet to the paved portion of any parking surfaces, e No tree planting area maybe less than rive (5) feet wide in any dimension and shall not contain less than Menty-five (25) square feet of continuous permeable land. Dedfgrd - 30-ft front yard area (may be on TXDOT R.O.W. with written approval - up to 10 R.) a Must contain 3 trees of 3 Inch caliper and 11 ft. in height a Ail shrubs, berms, or combination screen mire' be a minimum 3-ft, height I Colleisitl - 40 A, from property line. If parking Is setback 40 ft, the building frontage maybe setback 10 A. from property line. EIo"er,~found , e Principal Roadway- 2511. minimum from R, O.W. e Country Roadway - 25 ft. minimum from R.O. W, t a Sccuic Roadway - 30 A. minimum from RA.W, JjM0 EtilLis-25 ft. minimum front yard a landscape Buffer • 18A. in width, parking may intrude to 8 fl, provided the berm is not reduced (vorth Richland Hilb - 50 56 of landscape requirement should consist of shrubs, trees flowering beds, with majority in front yard area a Landscape buncr of !111. minimum, if parkin; permitted in the 6ont building line area llass North Tollway orridor ' Upall e Landscape Setback - 30 A. from R.O.W. ~I Preston Road Overlay District p • a Landscape Setback - A 30-R. wide landscaped edge from the front property line. Not to prohibit plat anent of driveway. Landscape edge may be reduced to 15 h., if the combined width of the unpaved R.O. W, and the landscaped edge is at least 4015. ' 16. +,a 25 x 32 X r sswuvs , o , xcaamrza date 1=. 190 tprMsedl e Landscape Setback- Minimum 30 n. from KOM., not to prohibit driveway opening, maybe reduced by as much as 15 n, of the rombined widdt of the unpaved R.O.W. and the landscape edge ism least 40 n. i Southlake a Landscape Standards -Areas of landscape plantings called bufferyards shall be provided along any applicable right-of--way. A recommended plant selection list Is provided. Additional landscaping, above and beyond the landscape ordinance, must be provided in the parking areas depending on the amount of parking provided between the building and the applicable right-of-way. New Orleans, Lqu(slans Bullard Avernic Urban Couidof District • Landscape Buffer - Within 20 n, from R.O.W, with trees planted one per 25 linear feet of street fronta ;e th2li ag lrban Corridor District a I,anescape Buffer -15 fL, may include utility R.O.W, trees planted one per 25 linear feet of street iron 1ge CITY OF DENTON CURRENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE NO. 98-100 D I tE F ERYARDS a. BuiTeryards shall be required under the following canditiam: (1) Multi family tlses shall buffer when adjacent to single family or attached housing uses. (2) Commercial uses shall buffet when adjacent to single-family, attached housing, multidandly , and lesser commercial uses. (3) Industrial uses shall buffer when adjacent to any use, ir.cluding lesser industrial uses, b. Plant materials, walls, or fences may be used within required yards, as specified in Section 35• 911 of the City Code, to buffer adjacent land uses. Trees or plans used in required yards may be used to demonstrate r •mpliance with other sections in this article. *'See Attached Section See attacheC section PROPOSED CORRIDOR ORDINANCE 5112ACK REOUIRENIENTS • 1) General provision: Driveway access and a sign in compliance with the City of Denton Sign Ordinance may be located in the setback area, All provision of the Landscape Ordinance 98.100 shall apply, and trees shall be placed in a manner to limit interference between pedestrians and the treer, 2) Gatews[ys: A 25-foot minimum landscape setback measured from the property line is required. Within the area, all existing trees shall be preserved, Native vegetation shall be undisturbed. No parking shall be permitted in the setback, 3) Entranceways: A 15-foot minimum landscape setback measured from the property is required. Withn the 0 area, all existing trees shall be presen ed. Native , ,getation shall be undisturbed. No parking shall be pemdned in the setback 17. i i a 1 r7 10 32:x 10 ~!r) x ! s , ,asaaaf. p w~eswse+ I ZONING 4 35.91 I Schedule Minimum Front Yards-Residential Districts r-- A IFP IF 1) f/.lu sr I ;.f M! R wr wry r fit I \L+In.T Ire .,N r lv a: n1.•un.•.•frJ dN .i q I : w~ I l ( I.~•.r.1 .M. fl: Schedule Minimum From Yards-Noriresidential Districts "i-7 a" ~ o a ea I Ira II HI j 4se ~s~ ftrl i\r ` ai 3 's 9f i I .rr n.. y, f ti.. `•fi; I 21 Special front yard regulations include the following: a Where the frontage on one (l) side of a street between two (21 intersecting streets is divided by two (2) or more toling districts, the front yard shalicorrply rith the requtrements of the most restrictive district for the entire frontage. See section 35.392. b. Where a building line has been established by plat or ordinance approved by the city planning and toning commission or enacted by the city council and such line requires a greater or lesser front yard setback than is prescribed by this chapter for the district in which the building line is located, the required front yard shall comply with the building line so established by this chapter or plat. c. The front yard shall be measured frrf i the property line to the front face of the building, covered porch, covered terrace or attached accessory building. Eaves • and roof extensions may project Into the required front yard for a distance not to exceed four 141 feet and subsurface structures may not project into the front yard to a'eight greater than forty (40) Inches, See section 95.390. d. Where lots have double frontage running through from one 111 street to another, a required front yard shall be provided on both streets unless a building line for I accessory buildings has been established -Jong one (11 frontage on the plat or by ordinance, In which event only one ill regt [red front yard need bt observed. Set O 0 section 35$91. e. If buildings along the frontage of any street in it singit block have observed an "sr average setback which Is greater or lesser in dimension than the mit,:mum front supp No I 18. M M +ui J l Y., S =in I tS 3591 DENTON CODE II Yard estabnished In the district, then the average front yard ofallbuildings in the block shall establish the minimum front yard; however, this provision shall not be Interpreted as requiring a frontyard of more than fifty (501 feel or any building to observe a setback exceeding ten (10) feet greater than that observed on any adjacent lut• Sec section 35.393. f. In the MF•2 district, a minimum front yard of twenty-five 125) feet shell be required; provided, however, that In nocase shall the distance from the centerline of the street on which a building fronts to the front face of the building be less than one-half the height or the building. See section 35.396. g. The minimum front yard setback In a plsnned developm^nt district shall be established by the final plan. h. Gasoline service station pump lslands shall not be located nearer than eighteen 418) feet to the frontproaerty line. Pump Island canopies may extend to Within ten r 1101 feet of the front p operty line, provided such canopies are not enclosed and remain unobstructed from the ground to the roof of such canopies. I. In the CB central business district, no front yard is required, except that no structure may be erected nearer than thirty (30) feet to the centerline of any street upon which such structure fronts, nor may any building be erected ahead of any building line established by ordinance, Ig1 Sidt ycrd. rt1 In the following tuning districts, the minimum required aide yard shall be in accor• dance with the following schedule, and no building, structure or use shall be located so as to have a smallerside yard on each sideofsuch building than required; provided, however, where a building designed and constructed as a two-family dwelling or , one-family attached dwelling is built across a lot lire or a lot on which a two-family dwelling is located Is subdivided or resubdivided, no minimum side yard shall be required on that sideof the dwelling where one (1) living unit adjoins the other living unit along a common wall: " I Schedule Minimum Side Yards-Residential Districts j r {FP 11 1 If 11 71' t W a 10 .I t.7 I'~ ~ 1 1 0 r jCC tt > r€ E I : , ) >5 sA iE fIG 111 •S A u` 1 . 4a1,•f rnSn'..f'arv.a•a rnnn'.m n}irrJ. dro' 10 Fraa 4baJ11 nq, a,faae {Jf rl'1 ~HI•n tJ Irtl MIrl Yf M:YJN ,r . {MJVJ,rld•nr,,ItM1: Nf4 J'.M,T.a Ir.lYildaxpd ~u aJ. raJIW fIJrJ'M H'•s inJ IAIMYl la rb hna~,p,•hA ` • n bq ' ~ f I fJ f , e.rl fR ~ t 1. I 19 1• I r I a • IuhM'.LJa t.. J' SJPP No 1 19. I `r 25 ~d 32x10 o , v ran YMrwe MM4 eeA fa"ce^uoW ItlgV\~eP f' MW MeI/i f /1 hl Z fMP♦' P•rM/Y/11yy~ 1 ua.t 1J` , ell- o f _ iLandscape Reserve 1 Carrolton Corridor Pine 32 10 JO i 'S Olga MqALMlJMMLmmg&m&m&M r tttt 1 . Q r i URBAN DESIGN AD14CWt tAMD Ufr I PPO MD NNILOFM[M AgACDO LAND Of n•XOSIO avIIONMod i~ u ~r arRl•uMr VII III IYXI.'INM Iup~I~+iMI ---~-M'IY•{rMIM rIQll1IMIM{ (n~DeI1WfI MMOM~ • •IY141X1 1=YI 10" 1 •M1wI WA1MX 1 1WM«~I1Yl~ ~iY1 41 N IX ,Y41 1Y iN 1Y YO11N f1 ~ 1~iie 40 ROItN4 ~ •1MIXRNrRwl.t rVYX1YrRMI1E .r~ ."~i.. I A, ~i:-; •v~ 1*..i ~ " ~ ~ ~r II 1rnlK I ~I I Iwo - 2 .J Ye.Y Y~1Yi Mr weM, ~•YYOI YMXI NYeI wY~Yle ~ Y1Mew1YN Y1YX.e1tYI M1 YW "y _ _ ~~t ~W _YI~11bl w_X _Y_e ~y Y ~ YIf1DYW1Y - ~ ~ • I •Nw~~ •~~~.~Y1r ~le r. AY..•, - Vu-+ 21 IAMDIUM M Fig lr IANDiCA" rxtu PROAMU/11t*" r~ rf I •.1 otv~t o~t~r~rsn~ _ 1 Iii Y.•II•e•ni•~i.~~r11M Ne111rNi• 1•I~,e[~NII Lill rl lri.l ...~1 •ir1.l~ •N~•14 Is f ~ • i , f 25 x 10 32 X I O iAwm w r 0 ~ r d wworAw 1 pi LANDSCAI STREET YARD nY 1MYpIN~ y-~ nY 11OYPIN ' ~L i~i~Y •llli it Inln w. ice, mm w~ f 1a IIY NI~II.N .DIY 1q\IIIN~ moo] ,Im1YN InYI w. IAA NM noYnW 1M_ ~ UL~ ~ ...1. .rte ~ ~ OWER~ MPREHENSIVE •r r. r. •r•r.~ •r rr r rr nr•.rr• rY .r nF •ii r••. i ~t l ~'~i 1 • .Jr • r 4` . R~ 32) i' ~ Screen Berm Ma 'or i emu hfarc twMPAVMMWMum9mym I d 4 S hr} rr 't '+61r F I M \lt~li Av1. .v t. f LANDSCAPED DESIGN 1 ---ELENIENT1'S --J screwed PaWng Berrn' hnling ~ <l ~ 1 1 ry ly rf c'i d µj"%+1, ~yt Il :v i R'.rd r,ltll~~R, i Vic i f'row Mcnsn's 11arking Lot 1 f' ~ ~ l1 q J ~ 11rn pn's Uistrihutic~n I'lano I'arkl%a\' \frrN ii Krtii Ih turl,l1Uon 14r111 d111 u 1 SJlri'v 11hulr,Jlc E eldiliv Road Addi,i,n. Tr\u, Ab- ri T ,r ,i icanrJ 1'di 1. i nk ~ I A,rdl gk,i"CII' iA 's - LANDSCAPED DEISIGN ELEINIENTS {f n~i Lee, : f 1 r1 'yby (Y.1~Mh~~d Cy,d~x ~ 1~ h w C y~,y *r 7~ ~ w { '.YY Ityp 3Yi~, a t~n',wwr ka~ h'41V f w i li~lllu+i EtI~,+J L • r,~ Id's s w 1 AIJ ~f 1 1". 'N 114" N' 'I 'S • d M(' ~ ~4`•~~+ tii~it~, b t ~t+111 3' ~ ~ y~l ~~~g~~ a y1 r 1 " o j'~ i iii li,•ni Inl i0 11,il + fw , Y n r, ~r. '4A 4 ~ r. J 4~ . LANDSCAPED DESIGNS ~ EI,ENIENTS I%l 1171 Slrcri~Ard Scibatk~ I fo~%cr Mound, I ctu, (:5 I'l. From I wukcal+c SclhaJ) •r d* } J I aa I i 0 bsaF„ , r l , 6 i • I i • t ~ r . ~rwbnr~w. tanwe ono rtn+~ ~ Q ~ The Beltline Corridor District _ Grand rrxlrlc, Texu 4b L. n iA Mt I~u.1 M.MK'IAtfJI.u r .n.. 4nP 27, 10 u 1 ~'AWWA1 y /IM~.wIM.wI W.y /M/.MY I~Mf /A117 ~ AY I.I.V M.MI V.Y« / /.MI I/wt' A'M /qM (rvvw..rw r'rYy pw.~ see Wei t" m m ! `Jf ! } y'y k Of .,fll m tl f 1J I ..:r:rr. ' .r MYMMf Iw (MV MA I..m~.r.NR hM..1JAwMYR/I.W IM ~.~MM~aM~~ IM My M'ME' (IM A....M~ FLOODPLUN SECTION N //'IY MY• ~.r'.. NI..IT/II~I • W.M MMIIN IM.IMT IMWTI'•M'rr NIIIMM.. rMVVV.IY.IYM..Y IM. ff rd .1 LA IV4 ~!;,fi11IJ1 1 B O O B U G S ~ o❑aaa❑ ®®8 n ra ppnnnn 0 ✓1 i`.~f~~.I ~.:II DELTLINE ROAD SECTION. The Beltline Corridor District Grad er.ldf, ref .f l9 C~Ylf M7110.1IAfKKNi1f i fw 19 2 n CJ 32 X I O a%& ERA I eraaeser . • 1 I Q Incompatible land uses require buffering Q Depth of Corridor Commercial should be using trees & walls or a combination not more than 300 feet and rat less thereof, than 150 feet o C310 l o d CO MB 0 0 99q[ad o COQ C3 c - s= to -ll vreearraave► +dafe+uatv+r venue Gomm U3 Design wrong corridors include uniform slgnage, Q Corridor development should orient traffic fr' shared drives, landscape bullets between roadways toward Arterial Sweets and dlscoursgo and parking tots, and lands aping In the street yar*s entering residential neighborhoods Corridor Commercial Ot Access to commercial property does ( Buffering between single family and not encroach into residential commercial uses may consist of neighborraeds. All access is daectly landscaping and/or solid walls, In from thoroughfare streets addition dumpsiers and mechanical equipment areas should be Q 0 ❑ screened. ❑ a interior of parking lots Q ay, should be landscaped. 1 p t. a 1 q a Commieroal rods Oq %ludd may corners ued to i knclude an t of the !nil reaction of any y combination theroor. _ a ❑ d a P Primary lchararterwic is that the commerclat d P 6 P ~7 actraly Is direclgd low aide the Interaction • P and does not extend ; Size of Comn.ercial Node is not restricted by width or depth. whatever IN lateraty down ft sufficlent to perform the necessarycommerclal eclivfty, unlike Corridor Intersecting atraels Commercial which Is encouraged to not exceed 300 feet in depth i No ,de CQmLrlerctal Commercial Development Forms MidCities Blvd. Corridor Study City of North Richlsnd HIIII 29 10' 32XID I 14"A A 0 I i I COP v1&vfh1db IIi Figure 2 - SH 114 Portal "A" - Existing I Proposed Image 1 (Westbound) n X F1 /y/ ~~/fMMr/YIrw ~1 I Existing I Proposed %r 32x Io ffifffffi~ o , c . i S I ary of 8outhrate Figure 3 • Portal *A' • S.H.114 ® East Southleke Boulevard L b /ARM f~f/.R N M , :ww MLL UAW ~OOWL mw mLrar p~nyN ~ I w'f ~ ln7MD f MM1/ t4.gniovwMp, O Ito 0A."YOU lhk AASSW ern w frwv..t J R a-- C u O g.. O/f 114 a 25 x I CJ 32 x IU 1 O 1 K i • 1 ~ I I i CRY of Sourhlake Figure 6 - Plan - Bridge Overpass P~VNIED DNOGF /C1lC fT'~ % IINL5re 6 ca+aRr ' aGlAH6N/AL TREE 4Re+'~ ew HPA'AN iommw ' V ~ • ._•..r.~..~ yam, , / ` SKUAL PA✓/•Kt I ~ ~ EfYtUuO Gyrettt LHR7fehY CeEtrE' RWU bwet ---rC, 'l5 x 32x0 L, • ' o - Ory oJSomthlake Y Figure 8 - Plan - S.H. 114 Landscape Zone i sravh4i R>tiD ' rm - y ftovnw< _ I` o (eRe lWkK Sm AM A Inn ^ p•..~ v ' Jill ~f I + 2 ! ~7 32 x O 0 O y n? ram I Ciry ofSourhtaki Figure 9 - M 1709 Portal "B" - Existing / Proposed Im.ige (Eastbound) - - 44, Existing e ~~i4r x r ~ - .r f L' 4 Y Atr l r V I1 _.L ~ dr ~ i r ' i, awna~ r .awe ai •sr Y L n I oly of &whtab Figure 10 • Pfau • Major Intersectlon at F.M. 1709 ~ AR11 A4K - } JMln tie 1 wnY Mro+ CWA"Mn AW I ar . .awiA E:. r ' pwne enwa- - I I I ! I f MW K.4R wepu mn.a ~-J*5 AJCTRAJAA A40 AfCGT MYW I Ip - [ I I 1 , 75 x 32 x 0 f O Screened EquiDment/LoadingQra;sh Addison, Terra P All screening must be at least six feet in height measured from the horizontal plane passing through the nearest point of the oft-street loading space and may be provided by using any one or combination of the followh g, subject to approval by an authorized Parks Department representative. s Evergreen shrubs planted three (3') feet on center, in a double staggered row, or a Evergreen trees planted (6') six feet on center, unless authorized Parks Department appnves an alternative planting dvrosity as being capable of providing a solid appearance within onn year. a A fence, will, or berm. Fences and walls troy not consist of corrugated metal, corrugated fiberglass, sheet metal, chain link, or wire mesh or any material that is in the Planning d Zoning Commission's opinion as unsightly material. a If screening with an ruthen berm, the berm must be planted with turf guns or ground cover recommended by the Parks Department. The slope of L%e berm shall not exceed 33% f t 1) for lawn areas and shall have a minimum crown width of 3 feet, Bedford - Equipment screened with masonry similar to main structure Flower Mo gld - 6 A. minimum, masonry w ill to match primary structure or planting kllA2 - Roof mounted mechanical units shall be screened. Oround mounted mechanical units shall be screened from view by wills constructed of the a ne materials and finishes as the building or by a solid landscape screen. These screens shall be a minimum of 6 ft. in height. Plants must be placed so as to ereue a 6-ft, all solid screen within two years of installation Southlake a NlychanicalEqui2mentScretnin mechanical equipment or satellite dishes must be visually screened from the applicable rights-of-way or from property within 400' which Is seaidentially toned or designated for residential use on the Land Use Plan. a Lgid pg Area Screening- Loading and service areas are limited to the side or rear of the buildings, A tmilnimum 10 foot solid masonry screening wall must be provided to screen views of any loading docks from any applicable right-of-way and residentially zoned property of property designated as residential on the Land Use Plan. a Trash as . 1 Sr aJU - All trash receptacles shall be located outside of bufferyards and eball be screened by a minimum g foot solid masonry screen on four sides, allowing a gate on one side. Fart Dels oir, Colorado . Desi¢nGuideLmgg No speei6e ordinance design recommendaticns included. d New Orleans. Loulslans Highway UrbanCorridgr Metric a Storage - Refuse slorage "closed 6 ft. opaque screen with gale t4 a Loading Areas - Screened by wood, brick, or masonry 6 fL minimum i Y' d 36 - -a6`1 25 32 i❑ b F Aw , 1 i a rv. .n .n _.n.. .raw s...... 1 t CITY OF DENTON CURRENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE 98.100 v (1) Outdoor Storage Area Screening a Any outdoor storage area, or portion thereof, must be screened from public rights-of-way using live evergreen screening plants, six (6) feet In beight at installation, spaced no more than eighteen (IS) Inches apart, edge to edge. b. A fence or wall may also be used for outdoor storage area screening, provided it Is at least six (6) feet tall, opaque, and of masonry, stone, or wooden material, or of the same material as that of the principal building. Dumpster enclosure openings may not face public rights-or-way unless they are gated. PROPOSED CORRIDOR ORDINANCE MECHNICAL EQUIPMENT AND ROOF-TOP SCREENING All mechanical equipment, including satellite dishes, must be visually screened from view from the designated roadway and from adjacent residential zones of uses. Roof-mounted equipment shill be integrated into the building design and screened from view from the designated roadways. , VEHICLE SERVICE BAYS AND LOADING DOCKS All vehlcie repair, service, and maintenance bays and ali laWing docks shall be arranged or screened to that the bay(s) or dock is not visible from the designated roadways or adjacent residential zones or uses. All screening provislons of Ordinance 98.100 shall apply. OUTSIDE STORAGE All business operations and activities shall be conducted within an enclosed building. The only exceptions for outside activity shall be off-street parking or loading; drive-in or drive-through windows a financial institutions, restaurants, prescription pliamucy or dry cleaners, and outside eating In conjunction with a restaurant, No merchandise than other vehicles located on a lot used primary for the sale of vehicles or living materials such as Christmas trees, pumpkins, and Gowen may be visible from the designated roadway or adjacent residential zones or uses. Merchandise maybe placed outside if screened by solid ve^etation at the time of planting as per Ordinance 98.100, er by & minimum 8-foot masonryor similar solid construction wall so that the merchandise is not visible from the designated roadway of from adjacent residential zoi cs of uses, r 37 i '.a Fri ,r' F x 32X • 0 Site Elements PARKING- Industrial MarnMin sfM free pla,hng5 oAevnd peryneltr ~ 5di4 rEnce around Skra9G ` I , ?re4 ~ I II ' l a Road E,r~r.1 5Mro9e and SCrvic• Guild/n9 fiidewa/k 1-1700 I9 Area (,rots B~%'er' Section A-A' JCresn VoNje areR w'?A n1a601ry a• woad } tna/0iure h comp/onra~~ arch~~ECfvr@ `I 9}ora a ,gar rice Gui la'M~ c t • ~ Area i 1 I 1 Berm and oed evenSrElns to area arovMd /oadmy prd sa}drago area I e I r • [ oadrrg A. - a A A' L l . d Plan F11 5A.6 Forl6eholr,Colorado Ueelgn Guldellaee ~ ■~rr~l~iur~rr,rrr~r~,rrr~r.~~..~ to re~i~rww,r~~r,~+~~ f, 1K ~,v a a M Vq } o I Site Elements BARKING- Vehicle Storage 9Gr&en 5f~raae orea Wv/h be, m anti ~gve•q-een ;-~'J~h~nys JG~P2 5/p rage 4~e4 w/K, y0lid NoM Awel cha-ink tente wfh vinyl singe 40' mrni,num Storage prEa _ _ G+~si•-~ lAeWa1A ~uFFe+ Section A-A' ~Marnlarn yfreef +eA S01id WOOLY fence/ f o/0~1 ings Choon Nk ;&ce vv4h Vrn r l 5frr~5 , e i I ~ A 0 ~VEftICLE , StORACsE A ~ Aa~s~ A, 061 Porltlelsolr,Colorado Ucslgn Guldllnes II! 6.1•i 39 3 2 a f • O 1 AmWiectual D Igo Aussto ' a Height- Max. permitted beight may increase as the distance from the R.O.W. increases. Within 200 fl, no building shall exceed 28 ft. Beyond 200 ft., max, height may increase, but shall not exceed 29 ft. in low intensity, 40 ft in moderate intensity, and 53 ft in high Intensity area I Building materials - Design shall utilize, to the greatest extent, building materials compatible with the Hill Country environment, such as rock, atone, brick, and wood. Mirrored glass with reflectance greater than 20 % Is prohibited. I i Bedfor a Buildings constructed of 1001/6 masonry a A pitched roof construction will be required on all structms 5,000 sq. ft. or less I Design shall include relief to walls end roofs on all structures 5,000 sq. n. or greater • Earth tones, pastels { Dish iDesign Worksheets are a part of the site plan opplicatic it package presented to the Community development staff along with, landscaping, parking, and civil en gineering drawings for review prior to building permit review.lhe scoring system is designed to achieve a simple minimum number as low as 15 in the Manufacturing District and to a high 30 In the Village Retail District a Ft^ade Articulation Variables -'his rule gives points for breaking long facades by a variation in the building surface. a Vertical Departure Variables - Ibis rule gives points for breaking walls in the vertical such as providing roof slopes a Shade Coverage Variables - Points tee awardad In this category for building facades that have projections or ether features that provide building ahadowa that visually break up long flat building facades. • Horizontal & Diagonal Ruof Plane Variables - Decorative features, roof or will designs like parapets, ridges, eaves, etc that provide visual interest, will gain a small number orpolnts, but can be useful to the designer as a tool to get tie points needed. a Fenestration Variables - Donis, windows, and other framed building openings help to break up the "bleak" look of a long blank wall Points are given for the amount of openings in a building surface. Design Guidelines Checklist a Consistency: The mixing of too many diffetent architectural styles within a development or between adjacent developments should be avoided • Materials Natural, unpainted materials should be used wbeneverpossible , a Colors: Earth end wood lone colon should be the primary colors used throughout the development , a Variation: Contrasting wall planes, architectural elements, and roof lines should be used to preclude monotonous elevations Grand Prairie a Materials - 83 % atone , brick, glass, not to exceed 50'Ya glass 0 • Co'or - Pastel earth tones a Design- Suggested simple style elements a Signtge - Signs regulated by size, location, and type n. 40 s ~ 2 10 32XI❑ 1 ~ ' ~ ~ ° iL[ 1 t ~ ~ ~ J r I 5 , l~ . 4' 1 f North Mchland Hills Arcliitectu it f J a Two story structures prohibited within rust 100 A f Exterior surfaces should be brick or atone, concrete and stucco prohibited o Design of structure must I-xlu& relief to walls end roof, no single uninterrupted surface-planes film Building Design - a Materials - 75 %of any exposed exterior wail shall consist of glass, native stone, clay-fired brick or tile, or it combination of these. All exterior buildings nude of glass shall have a maximum exterior visible cegectance of 20 Color finish must be cons istent with the remainder of the building. , Southlgkg Architectural Design a Building Fagade Articulation -All fscadee which are visible from the applicable rights-of- way or are within 400 feet of residentially zoned property or property designated as residential on the Land Use Plan shall provide horizontal and vertical articulation to break-up the recedes. -Horizontal Articulation - No buildings fagade shall extend greater than one (3) times f' the wall's height without having a minimum offset of 15% of the wall's height, and such offset shall continue for a minimum distance equal to at least 25% of the maximum length of either adjacent plane. s - Vertical Articulation - No horizontal will shall extend fat a distance greater than three (3) tunes the height by a minimum of 15% of the wall's height, and such height change shall continue for a minimum distance equal to at least 2$% of the mwilmurn length of either adjacent plane, a Masonry Requirements- Facades which are visible from applicable rights-of-way nr from property within 400 feet zoned residential or designated as low or medium density residetiOl on the Lxad Use Plan, such masonry requirements shalt exclude the use of cement, concrete tilt will, and other masonry materials of similar characterbrics. In addition the use of standard concrete block hall be limited to 1046 of any fvgade viable from adjacent public right-of-way; and stucco or plaster shall only be allowed when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7r8a Inch thickness, or by other process producing comparable stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications, a Exposed Columns - All exposed structural support columns must be constructcJ of or clad in the um~ masonry msteeal as the principal structure. a Architectural Fencing - Alt fencing which runs parallel to the applicable rights-of-way must be constructed of the primsry masonry material of the building, wrought iron, or living plant material and shall provide for a minimum offset of 6 feet every 60 feet of will, a Reflective Class - No mote than s0% of any building fagsde may be reflective glass having a 1 reflectance greater than 10%. r ' . z a Height -The height of any applicable building shall meet the requirement of the underlying zoning district unless adjacent to residential property- then the building shall be controlled by l1 a height limitation line having a ratio of 4:1 from the property line. , a r t 41 ~l t :25 x 32xU Q r t A~Y 1 k Y ~ y l.'.i .y 1 I1 I i 1 I . ~ ~ J 1 ~ T e (1' ,Kra( ( t ) ~ ~ t RIMIMN '1' ✓ ~ 1 4 O . w. ~,..,.r.,.r:s til.n . J._ Y f Ta V. , y i { PROPOSt 1 CORRIDOR ORDINANCE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS r 1) Materialist The exterior wails of the building visible from the designated street shall be comprised of stone, cost stone, stucco, brick, limestone, granite ore similar appearing natural or created masonry material. A micimum of ' 10% of the building fagade visible from the designated street she]. be comprised of "split face" concrete block. Glass including windows and doon shall be limited to no more than 50% of the front building fa;ade visible from the designated street and at, ku than 20%. The exterior glass shall have a maximum reflectance of M. An alternative building material consistent with the appearance of the materials listed above may be approved upon recommendation of the Building Official to the Director of Planning, 2) Colors Neon and fluorescent colors are specifically prohibited on all building faces visible from a designated gateway of entranceway. 3) Desigot The design of eacb structure shall include horizontal and vertical srticulahoo. No awgle uninterrupted y' sudoce plane shall be permitted. Referent c Exhibit A. Building Articulation, 10 r 1 I It 1 I I • ~ ~1 k a 42 10 1 7 1 1 111 1- - W- '~'6ddldj I e . ,vow" 0 I ;K*JVAy COMMERCIAL EUILOING OESIGN 1LLL S i RA i i0N • A ,•1. _,rn y r~l FRONT O-VATION 1 Tri~ 1.1• _ • -.r4 BUILDING F001 PRINT J I 1 pp MJ e_+rTPROW l E=1 SIOF (NORTHWEST) & RIGHT Side (SCUTMSST - NOT SHOWN) E-VAT7ONS PROJECT: Columbia HCA Medical Orrice Building 8 4301 Brown Trail SCORING: NOTES: ZONING DIS T. = CC-1 • Village Retail -sects required ■ 30 points A. Facade Articulation: 25 88 pts, - multiple comer breaks on all sides B. Vertical Departure: 6.20 pts. -resldentlml style sloped roof • C. Shade Coverage: 4,00 pts. 'several porticos on ail visible aides D: Horizontal Planes: 17.30 pts, - multiple roof planes i E. Fenestration: 16.60 pts, - multiple window and door openings TOTAL POINTS: 69.98 points APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: This building scored very high ertd is approved because of the eln;,ed rooJan the many porticos and window and door openings. These fcatures break up the building planes providing for much visual relief, Even though the building Is long and deslgn feat irisomewhat repetitive, the and result is an attractive, visually appealing facade that is Il with Caiievville architecture. 1110vv ULPO+ - - - ccmoatible City of Col1e)~Vllle Commerclei Deel=e Overlq Dblrlet 43 r ~i C~] 32 • o COMMERCIAL BUILDING DESIGN ILLUSTRATION - 8 ---2- noaautrar Ncto 1 , LE--TSIDE(sour"ARIGHTSIDE L .11LLL (NORTH -NOTSHOWN, E.EVAT10N5 - - w~- BUILDING FOOTPRINT h1~ { _ulo ulu FIL -1 L 4 LP FACNT E:S/ATVON PROJECT Slackbuster ViCeo Il SH 121 north of Glade Road SCORING: NOTES: ZONING GIST, = CC2 • Shopping Center 'score required ■ 25 points A. Facade Artlcu!atlon; 6,46 pts, ' long building sectlons bring points down 8, Vertical Departure: 0.24 pts. 'same credit for rounded edge of canopy C. Shade Coverage; 0.00 pts, ' no credit is given for unframed shaded areas I D: Horizontal Planes: 2.00 pts. • credit for canopies that create roof planes E. Fenestration: 1.30 pts. ' Isrge glass expanses without framing TOTAL i+01NTS: 9,94 paints APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: This building socrod very low and is not approved because of the long wall 0 t tyyj expanses without viswl relief. Tile windows we flush with the wall surface and there are few door openings to break the wall planes. The roofllne is straight and unbroken cominul, Ig the stark look of the wall planes. The canopies are the only design feature that do provide s visual break in the building, but that feature is not sufldent to bring the points up to a passing grade. The and result of this deal n Is a comm"al "box fook"with little visual aooeal. r tee wieen city or coneyvme commerdet Design Overley Distrid 21) I0 32xIO ggigigaiii p ~ I r' 0 0 4 \ae.aye . COMMERCIAL BUILDING DESIGN ILLUSTRATION • C r, .l.i r11N1 1,1 1 1 • ~ FRCNT ELEVATION du LL!NG FOOTPRINT RtuHT SCE (NORTHEASi) ELEVATION It' 41 LE=T SIDE (SOUTHWEST) E'.fi/ATICN PROJECT: E, Nerds Orug Store 1! Glade Read at Colleyville Blvd. SCORING., NOTES: J -44 ZONING OISTI = CC-1 • Vulage Retail • score required ■ 30 pclntq A. Facade Artie--AtIcn: 6.20 pts. ' some credit for 100% vis'Alty (4 aides) 8. Vertical 0e,18rure: 0.40 pts. ' lack of sloped or rounded reoflines or edges • C. Shade Coverage: 14.e3 pts, • strong front portica with wide column framing 0• Horizontal Panes: 6.00 pu. ' wail-roof parapets and rootline changes E. Fenestration: 4.00 pts, ' good window openings and few side openings To JOINTS: 31,43 paints + APPROVED 1 01 SAPP ROVED 17 O • J14 COMMENTS: This buildi,Ig 6chieved a more than adequatA sacra and is appravedl the strongest feature of the Facade is the front portico with large columns that frame the openings at the front Most cf the other scores were mid-rangs. While the sides Mere relatively flat, material changes and v is parts cechere at the side for prescriptlon pick-up helped to alleviate this aspect. Since all four tildes of hi !wilding are visible from the street, it took a concerted effort to provide n0cfent Interesd~ndes to gain a passing score. r mnnmreek, City or Colteyr.lle Commercial D# rl`n Orerley Diehl! 45 ,00 .5 ~U 32xio COMMERCIAL BUILDING DESIGN ILLUSTRATION - D (CP-0 District) 5v ~r• r ` ~fL, ~t ~~cife •~rT~.~.. rc,i ,ll` Ih t1,~. `+=,t~.-J ~ t Y L yl ~ I / ..y t i•. v~ a,+~er • f.:iA. l fit.: J l,s ! .I y ~ 14.1 14 1 is t k I 1 f iHS'!1,; t uurini rti.rl II, •il;n It,ul.i~ Ili:h I11 ~P;iOJE (T _Fla'r~I~TIiI r rs i~ E '~7 + `301(,cl~j~ill~ E31 d RF_fJIJIRE D SCORE: 90 PROJECT SCORE, > > .J - __r _ 46 c C COMMERCIAL BUILDING DESIGN ILLUSTRATION - H (l District) ~r~-dG: "dam 4~iy1.~" f - I, MR 6 i i I I 1 YQ f L'1 4r 5 . F aX S C V 4 1 ,10 I'Ih o((nlll)~illc Tr FiC 1(SAYF BOTH SS) ( ornwcrki.il Ursipn ll.rrla% ISi.lricl PROJECT: O F'!J f la< Inc Build rig !1 E E504 Colleyville Blvd I Rt_QUIRED SCORE_ 10 - 47 PROJEC SCORE I n Y C COMMERCIAL BUILDING DESIGN ILLUSTRATION I (ML District) - ON F t ~ v 'c 1ip, 'rti ~L~X'v~~v .1 - ~+Sy` V~ t ! ✓ ~ ~S~ ' Jam- ~ _ C } 1P 1 NEV f .l'! f 11'J0 1 CBS 00 J v l ii!!~ i Ila ~1e4 3 i t .7 7A7, C i NU 7 ^ r{a ~>aA s' x.Lg1'~S. ri' f sr. 1 l~Yj L9`I^ iti• ."CAy ti Ya. z li e~ 'L~ ~'~,t t s t .1 I i ii iss • O Y..~~_`a.-r Y7 ,Yt•rvY tG; t' afs,;;t; _ 7TH " a S."~ P ~"jC! terc r w . o Ih of 1 Wit 4 F'.GN 511:E ELEVA fI:N Coinmrrridl ih,ipi Ihrrl,n IIM,ict I PROJECT Eiovle' An -r,ol Hoso'.;al 6u Id r,g 1l G413 Colleyville E31~d 6 REQUIRED SCORE 10 _ 48 PROJECT SCORE: 34. ~~~r.~t~~\~}. r'~+IY~!^1 111 t i 0 I I COMMERCIAL. BUILDING DESi,A ILLUSTRATION , J CC-2 District 1 I,an 'T _1L,f. 1. _,~Lf~µ aQ~lf .i¢~ + ,l1y Hk/J}tex~l ..ll'h R. 't l P _T= 4AV COW FLU _ - ~.~d'::~-y~~'Y.tf'... ' CCI I EYVe I E M VD FROM EI EVATION 1. PP A . . i.. f INU.i YAPPAWU -If :7 GLOOM FRONT ELEVATION IPROJECT: Kroger Grocery Building 114904 Colloyvi~ IIe® REQUIRED SCORE: 2$ PROJECT SCORE: 36.31 City orCalleyvlne Commercial DeLlo Overlay District YyW I I , o C Cr~L_ ~~L ~~Cr'v.~C J iIC C' nL bUIL.:Ih~U UDES ~3N f FACTORS C0.P.I1PARISON OF TV40 BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO STORES i r 7J L' a _ CCLLE'r;V-E STORE 1 SH 121 ! DESIGN SCORE = 11.21 O ROO e_ z Y - ! NORTH RIC-?LAND HILLS STORE ! HWY. 163! SCORE = 28.64 I 5() r 4 " 11 I fh,ien I nnit% %li11, KJ. I'4enn. fear" ELENTENTS OF I)F.SIGN STANDARDS e ~ ~,F r 1h r. ra. ~ 1d 0 1~ 'f ~ ~ axL i rlau y w as ARw ~ r r. }-t Q e r ^ I,t~v~i I anal ~!~•,c (nmle,r.,ll,uil~ 11x1 I I I f ~1 I I'I i 1'.,w \II,unl. Il\d, 11004:1 %10W)d. Il'\.h 1 I i I 2cq ~ y i 1 , ~jf i P y t a • d d r ~l. L 1<C124 ,y~r~1t`Fy4 kl ~t } J~ 6hr~rrl~ ARCHITECTURAL rirFY~ kt rY t1 ~ DESIGN ELEMENTS w G, w r x! Aif' r, yi t r':' 0 O InlIU5lfla! I)i51fICI Plano Park.+'ay. t : ~~r•',, Plano, Tcxa, I y Y '.'T ) fY f. 1 52 rvi„~ yLvA J it ~ r l r Y qu, + n r T yi Nib. IT .n.. r SC IN * y ti I 1 fl ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ELE~IIEN7'SAl { 4a`~~RIT' 1 ~M~1 Y~ R I~~~ IJI i~41 (\'tl l~ 401 a Yw MM,. ti{IUI III AM II XAS . 47 A .s • y p 1 ~~d I UNIFORMITY IN ARCFIITECTURAE. DESIGIN EI.ENIENrl'S r ~J ~'~~I Cdr )i;11•i~P ~l i ~r,rry~u"{rrRrt7"r Ti`ta`n F{~ i YQr . i ~ l h 1 v. r rt ~~(Fi r~ i ~liv{✓'~` yZ~~,~ jmY(ri"~~y g~' i• 40~'?r hr~Pl4i';4"r'~`I` ~'~`~.4•. gel" r r 'r r• ,<~,yr,~.g,. -aM1 ~-0~{ tr~fj7`,.~a'~r ~ I ~ i41 V ~ r ~r r r r,b~ i i+ a Any C E 74 L o . ' r . ~w ter. TVI i r 1 }fir r O { i FIGURES: ARCHITECTURAL STYLE SAMPLE STYLE ELEMENTS ; Metal' TJe i C] 0 i ROOF TYPES AND MATERIALS ^n rkslFloorAetell YdnJowAAkutmnen ° 7 Y ~ . • ICI DOOR AND DOORWAY DETAILS WINDOW DETAILS ARCADES CHARACTER ELEMENTS Note. See sample p~otoyrephsolproJcch on film with the Plsnnln° Oepmdmenl t Grand Prairie BeitEne Corridor i 0 a , I ' I I I FIGURE 6: EXAMPLE A-CHILI'S CASA LINDA Tile Roof Pampcl • Good ! Masonry Building of 15%• Good I( Windows4l3tins within Pcrccntale do Rdleomce • Good a1 Colo( • Nonconlorminl to Archimctosal Dniln :y~.~.,~ay\^`~a Chaacut• Needs Modification: .>s Watl Sipn wiAsin Covenle Percenrote • Good \ - ~r~.~"_'' .~C.'C,~..,~F ;...~s ' 1,~~' It ~ tl~'~•~Y-~' t ~ I • ~ ll 1' ~ I t t r r t ~ ~ ~ r l ~ ~1"h~r~ • , _ ~ • r t ! rte- , 1 .rte....`-~~ , ' ' . /-S rte..- . . , .r-• ~ I Cua Linda Shopping District . Dallm f Grand Prairie Behline Corridor f 32XIO 1 FIGURE 7: EXAMPLE B-s HILl'S WESTCHESTER Windewtl WAS within Percentsje & Rcncctance • Coed i Coley • None onfomingle AmMacenlral Duirn _ Charactot•Needs Modifiemion Entry Roof & Now Wsll • Noneonronninli • Needs Modification - Roof- MaiedsisndColor Penpet Wall • Style Elements M,aonry Buldin j 0( 15% • Good . Wall Sign wi LVII Coremp Perccnta:e • Cood b tZ ~7A Site Lendaeape • Good ~ ~ . • r I IVufe}maler Dhltfct • Crsnd PnGls Grand Prairie Beldfne Corridor l Man" w i ` t' i -I stln®sr 3 i i 1 a EXHIBIT 43•A RUIt DINARTICULATION e r H - Height of building MHFL o Maximum horizontal facade length MVFL - Maximum vertical facade length MHOL a Minimum horizontal offset length 'y MVOL - Minimum vertical of set length t ~3 v ~ _ Ta_ q r- } P 1 ~ dk r M! ~ a x I. TO h4ff1.-7(Fi) I it , WROL~155(t11'~ F:HF2..15li otauwoum lcryA of cidu adjucot p6nc I { ISOMETRIC OF HORIZONTAL ARTICULATION MVFL 25%ofrtualM=kart of eiAer adjattn( piano t•SVfI MVOL ~ IS1G (F ~ f H-1. Wn, "FEE "Hitt I Pt ~ x- a tl . ! • z a. }srar r i, N :I ~i~' 'ntl !I }P ;1ryq' a'uy ~i t • a I, li, 11 I I„ I I f ~I I°~I~, n I '7~ I I I a~ { d„ d,a:: ils3:.', 11 CLAN N'l NY- HORIZO JLTAL ARTICULATION ELEVATION • VERjICAL ARTiCULATIOY r t City ofSouthlake 4 VIA i:, 25 x M 32 x CE) LA W-AL-MRMIMMUMMM-M-R& f 1 4 - , EXHIBIT 43-E REOUIPED BUILDING SETBACK FROM RESIDENTIAL r r, a: Residentlal t t ytoe Property Line tt~ Q~o4 ~ fso~ ~~.aeu r Resldentlal ResrYard.40 I At15104° F ---00 Rear Yard 50 It 100 150 200 a . i t y r.r i , Nate: Per Soction 45.11, no con resides,W building may eucroub to Cie aces above a line having a slope of 4:1 from any property line of a residentially Cooed property or a property with a low or medium dens: y residential Ind Cue destpadoo is the Compre&rulve Laod Use Plan. However, a structure may be built ,\p to wltb3n 10 fat of the ! i 1>` residendal property lime, Provided that the succture h no greater than otte story or 20 feet in helSht. r " ~ t t ~ Psi l / 1 ti City of Southlak4 59 e , o , Site Access A~uta • Principal Roads -Direct access to a principal roadway is prohibited if the lot has less than 200 ft. of !i frontage. Joint access may be required for abutting lots, which have insufficient frontage to allow a driveway approach. • Hill Country Roadways - Access maybe prohibited from any tract having acc rss to a street intersecting with a Hill Country roadway which has access though an existing Joint use access easement or driveway. If access is not prohibited, access is restricted to one A sway unless traffic volume exceed 5,000 vehicles per day, or a traffic impact analysis dersonstratea need. Nc "lore than two access points shall be permitted. I Bedford Sjisd Acccss Required - Access to individual development shall be obtained through mutual and cross access drives on-site, Multiple driveway entrances shall be prohibited, Grand Prairie • Curb Cuts - One for every 200 ft. of frontage, not closer 150 A. center line to center line • Joint Access - Required North Rlcbland bills • Shared drives and parallel access drives required Traffic Circulation Plan 1i Dedford + A traffic circulation plan shall be prepared and provided, with the Specific Use Permit site plan, for all new development i CITY OF DEN ro1V CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE 'Access to Arterial Streets, Acccss to Collector Streets, and Separation of Driveways referenced, see attached. PROPOSED CORRIDOR rPRDIVANCE jRAFF.IC -C PCU1A770V PLAN A traffic circulation plan shall be prepared and provided for all new development. This plan should allow a safe and efficient now of traffic Wout of the property to maximize the capacity of the roadway. Access management design features will allow the congestion of the adjacent roadways to be ndnimized. Examples of , access management include comer clearances, driveway spacing, joint access driveways, and parallel access roads. The Traffic Circulation Plan should provide detailed information showing how the development will minimize transpora6on impacts while proviSing the necessary business connection to the Entranceway Q Corridor The plan shall be reviewed by the City of Denton Engineering Department for compliance with all subdivision regulations. 60 A sarn. 0 -aUBDIVISION AND -LAND DEVELOPMENT F apT o an (7) MQdificatione After the work performed under the permit is approved, no person shall thereafter alter or change the approved driveway or parking lot without submitting a new application In accordance with the provisions of this section. (d) Access to arterial streets The requirements for access to arterial streets shall be as follows: (1) Rgryose. The access regulations of this subsection are adopted In recognition that primary and secondary arterial streets are designed and intended to be used as major routes carrying high volumes of traffic. Each driveway access allowed to an arterial street will necessarily interfere with the function of those streets, Thls subsection, therefore, is adopted for the purpose of preserving and enhancing the traffic capacity of arterial streets by strictly limiting direct driveway access to those streets. (2) cc s crke ' Driveway access to a primary or secondary arterial street shall be governed by the following criteria: a. Access to any arterial street shall not be allowed unless there Is no other reasonable means of providing safe and adequate access to the property. b. Developments and residential subdivisions shall be required to provide a public marginal parallel access street, alley or private parallel access drive to serve the development or individual lots fronting the arterial street, unless the requirement would make the property wholly useless for any pertpitted use as zoned. c. No development shall be allowed access to ar. arterial street if property excluded I from the development plans could have reasorably been used to provide adequate alternative access. d. Any property previously subdivided In vlolation of state law or city ordinance ' shall not be allowed access to any arterial street, if other access could have been provided except for such unapproved subdivision of the property, e. Existing single•famiy and two-family lots not developed In accordance with paragraph b of this section may be developed with a circular drive constructed in 0 accordance with Appendix A-8 and Appendix A-9. Such driveways must be at least 50 feet from any intersection measTred from the right-of-way line and most be at least 10 fee: away from any adjacent driveway measured between radius. The circular drives shall not be designed such that a connection from a residential to an arterial street is created. 0 (3) /access standards When driveway access to an arterial street Is the only reasonable 0 means of providing safe and adequate access to the property as determined In accordance with this section, the following standards shall apply: Nerd jl a gel renion M wdIAW renton. AxxDDdu 61, M 3 10 • 0 S l SUBDIVISION AND aND nv 2L0PM,-.SJ .SilApTER 34 a. Cornrnercial. - 1. Only one (1) driveway per property shall be permitted, unless all of the following conditions are met: i. The applicant submits a traffic engineering study performed In accordance with accepted professions: traffic engineering standards as determined by the E city engineer, clearly showing that the traffic for the single permitted drive- i way would exceed five thousand (5,000) trips per day or five hundred (500) trips p-r hour during peak hour use, ii. permitting the additional driveway would not violate driveway separation or comer clearance standards; and iii. The need for each additional driveway would substantially outweigh any traffic problems or hazards created on the arterial street by allowing the additional driveway. 2. The driveway shall, whenever possible, be required to be located and designed so as to provide joint or shared access with adjoining properties. 3. The development which Is allowed access shall be required to pay for, design or provide, at no cost to the city, all traffic-control signs, equipment, structures, devicee or improvements which are reasonably necessary to minimize the effect of the additional access allowed or to provide for the safe movement of traffic or pedestrians. b. Residential, Only one (1) driveway lot shall be permitted, except that a circular drive constructed in accordance with Appendix A-S and Appendix A-9 and meeting the applicable comer clearance and separation standards may be permitted. (e) Access to collector streets. The rer:I*ements for access to collector streets shall be as S follow,: (1) Commercial, Industrial and multifamily properties fronting on collector streets shall be allowed one (1) driveway for each seventy-five (75) feet of frontage on one (1) street, provided that each driveway would meet the separation and corner clearance requirements o,' this section. The 6riveway shall, whenever possible, be required to be located am dcsigaed so as to provide joint or shared access with adjoining properties. (2) Single- and two-:amity residential developments shall be designed so that lots do not require driveway access to existing or proposed collector streets. If the shape or size of the property is such fiat the lots cannot be designed to avoid driveway access to a collector Nord pkeurd wenloa as torFAd I enbe. .470(OOEbi 62 w Kamm s 0 isxssvrw SUBDIVISION Atm. LAND DEVEIAPNENT HATER 34 street, driveway access may be designed in accordance with the requirements for existing single-family and two-family lots. (3) Existing single-family and two-family lots may be developed with a standazd , residential driveway or a circular drive constructed in accordance with Appendix A-8 and Appendix A•9. Such driveways must be at least 50 feet from any intersection measured from the right-of-way line and must be at least 10 feet away from any adjacent driveway measured between radius. The circular drives shall not be designed such that a connection from a residential to a collector street is created. (f) S_ eparation of driveways. Driveways shall be separated as follows: (1) The regulations of this subsection are for the purp ;e of ensuring that all driveways are separated by sufficient distance so as to avoid int, eying with the safe movement of traffic. In interpreting and applying the separation requirements, the following shall apply: a. The separation requirements shall be determined in reference to any existing driveways on or off the property, Where applied to a property which is ]orated adjacent to an undeveloped tract, the separation requirements shall account for the placement of future driveways on the adjacent undeveloped property. b. The minimum separation specified may be reduced if the amount of street frontage for the property is insufficient to e11ow for one (l) driveway access that would have the necessary separation from an existing driveway on adjacent property. If a reduction in the minimum separation specified is allowed, the separation shall be reduced only to the degree necessary to allow for the driveway. c. The separation distances specified shall be measured from the nearest edge of each driveway at the tight-of-way line. (2) The minimum driveway separation standards are as follows: Minimum t ee fin Feet) • Arterials 300 Collectors 75 Local/estate 10 (g) Comer clearance standard-1. Corner clearance standards shall be as follows: (1) To ensure that the traffic movements from driveways do not unduly conflict with the 0 movement of traffic on intersecting public streets, the minimum distances be tween drive- ways and the intersections of public streets are adopted in this subsection. In Interpreting and applying the standards, the following shall apply: Nord prward venion w torriied nnlon. Avoraoru 63 32X10 4 ~ I`1 L ~ 24' Mutual Driveway Easement to set back W Imm property pne Corridor Road Vacant Lot ' i r' Shared Driveways Without Parallel Access Road ,I 24' Mutual Driveway Easement to set back W from property line Corridor Road _ I r Shared Driveways With Parallel Access Road f ti~ ~ t Typleal of Shared Driveway Actress Alternatives Y^ J , r; I City of North Rlchlend "IM 64 , w ~ 25 32X 10 x 10 Parking Layout Sxapd Prairie e parking Location - 1 bay (approximately 64ft plus landscaping) between front building face and 1 property lines. Any additional parking shall be provided beside or to the rear of the building. • Circulation -joint access required to provide smooth flow of traffic. FIGURE I: SITE LAYOUT JLVA~ 1K..tr r-.--.e We lmumofIfu 09ayoIParkfng 4 4 In Front of Bulldintp facade ' ~s aa.T'~AU v / Tay 3 A. e s~::k -fie ~AR ~n~.y^.~f4L. ZPyd.,~'i S•. •.~j. Jornl Access Access netween Properties 1517 Ft. Mntmum • i 200 Ft. Average i Sauthlake Parking Lot Impacts • The parking lot landscape areas shall be modified as follows based on the percentage of parking located between i,c building fa;ade and the R.O.W, Less than 25%- 13 sq. A. per parking stall 25°Ne •750,1e - 19 sq. A. per puking Ftall Greater than 75%- 23 sq. A, per parking stall "Where parking Is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W., shrubs obtaining a mature height of three (3) feet or greater must be planted al a t%nimum spacing of ihIrty Inches (30') en center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas. 65 10 32 aaaralaa c EXHIBIT 43•D PARKING P£RCENTA A ATIOA'S 6uIL91N6 ~ 6UI L17tNb o~ca rr P~.R KEN (iv. & fKw 100 7. *r AL ~~JJ ~Ja fIJ Vf [aJ.V• --j IL py n4/.n lrer/s.+. lsn ay l~•/..slier /Rrt ls.e 'l H i' WIL 1hSQ_ 6 i 6~a~ bLOb. n.l aa• I ee rr"'~ ~ . AlKW6 (70i ToT1L) M K W G, K607. or 'rTwl~ P 1 El Cf Tvfat. [[M1~.Ir h.f 1 ae~+) w>. n.. • I[+.. e~ Ulrsa T.a. <I'w••a ...w•f1 . ~ti W/W Ver /M1f4 tUi I P.. n4/r, 1S. 17fi/aM. H.D ' NOTEr Per Section 43.9.b.3.g, landscape areas must be provided throughout the parking lot based on the percentage 1 of the total parking spaces which are located between the building facade and the right-of-way as follows: Percentage t [ndscone Area R ouh Per Parkins Stall 0.23% 13 square fxtper stall 2554.75% 11 square feet per Still > 75°r4 23 square feet per stall Clty of 5outhlake I 66 32X 2 10 r, ❑ 0 arasaama 0 , rims" I Prohibited Use Bedford Any outdoor sales or storage as principle or accessory Automatic coin or attendant operated car wash Automotive glass, trim, or upholstery shop Automotive repair shops and garage, as principle or secondary use Chenucal an,' allied products manufacturing and packaging Convenience grocery stores Convenience stores with a drive-tbru window i Dairy products manufacturing and/or wholesale i Drive-in and drive-thm restaurant Gasoline service stations Heavy construction equipment and implements Laundry, dry-cleaning & dyeing plants Massage salon Meat, fish, or poultry markets Me tale and meal product manufacturing and assembly Mobile home, campers, and recreational vehicle sales Multi-family dwellings/apartments/condominkums Pawn shops Self-service storage facilities Sexually oriented business Ter xtilea and fiber products Wholesale automotive vehicle equipment and establishments f of l eys it lr Mobile home dwelling Farming &Livestock breeding)'raising Public maintenance & storage buildings Solid Waste disposal sits Railroad or motor freight terminals Transportation vehicle storage yards or garages Automobile repair & storage w/ outside storage Warehouse and distribution food packaging and manufacturing All other manufacturing Grand Prairie l Livestock sales k` Electrical substation- SUP I RsdiorTelevision Tower- SUP Water treatment plant Sewage pumping station l Railroad passenger terminal S~tttb]~ke l Permitted Uses - Permitted uses shall be in accordance with the underlying zoning district. However in C. 1,C-3, and c-4 districts, tires, batteries, and automobile accessory sales, provi&d that such activities occur entirely within the confines of the business structure itself mad nursery yards may only be allowed u a Spe.iirc Use Permit MO i . 67 32xIo o PROPOSED CORRIDOR ORDINANCE LIML'ED VISIBILITY USE The following uses shall be prohibited from being visible from the designated roadway. These uses are permitted if screened by solid vegetation at the time of planting, masonry walls, or r:milar solid construction, or by design within a building in addition to the required setback, so that the use is not visib',e from the designated roadway or from adjacent residential ?ones or uses. Primary Residential Use Trailer Camp or Mobile Nome Park Educational. Institutional and Special Use Correctional Facility Occasional Sales Utility. Accessory and Incidental Use Accessory Building Electric Generating Plant Electric Substation Electrical Transmission Line Private Utility Shop or Storag: Y,rd Public Building, Shop, Ycrd of Local, State, or Federal Government Sewage Pumping StanOn Sewage Treatment Plant Telephone Line and Exchange Switching or Relay Station Pater Reservoir, Water Pumping Station or Well Water Treatment Plant Drag Strip or Commercial Racing Fairground or Exhibition Area Go-Cart Track Sexually Oriented Business Transportation Related Uses Hauling or Storage Company (vehicle parked and visible from the corridor) Motor Freig' t Terminal Railroad Freight Terminal Pailroad Passenger Station Pa king Lot Truck A eomobile Service Uses Auto Wrecking or Salvage Yard Tire Retreading or Capping Retail and Seri ice Type Uses riousehold Appliance Service and Repair (Outside) Secondhand Store, Used Furniture or Rummage Sale Tool or Trailer Rental Autiyi1ural Typc Usqs Hatchery, Poultry Livestock Auction Livestock Feeding Plant, Pens, or fords a Commercial Tvye Use Contractors Shop and Storage Yarl i Heavy Machinery Sales and Stooge Petroleum Products Storage.Who~esale Storage and Sales of Furniture or Appliances Outside A Building Trailer Rental or salt' Natural Resource Storm aylExtraction . ~ Petroleum Co:lCoilec*:rig or Storage facilities 5=ial Industrial ProceAu Asphalt or Concrete Hatching Plant Brick Kiln or Tile Plant Cement or Hydrated Lime Manufacture Dump or sanitary Fill Area Mixing or Sale of Concrete open Salvage Yard for Rags or Machinery etc. S melte r or Re finery 6R 12 S 32X10 MW I aassewsr~ 4 d ' t e . WORMWOOD f r Non-Conforming Use Bs9Cucd Nonconformity- AU structures that art nonconforming at the time of adoption of the "HC", or which are deemed ronforming as a result of regulations, shall be subject to the following: a Existing uses that are legal uses in the underlying districts, but are caused to be nonconforming by the regulations of the "HC", shall be considered legally conforming uses. a All related non-conformities relative to Landscaping and Screening Regulations and Development Standards, shall be brought into compliance prior to Much 1, 2003. This does not apply to structures that do not meet architectural standards. a Any site, which is non-conforming to the regulations listed in Landscaping and Screening and Development standards, shall submit a Bite assessment, in the form of a site plan, wbich indicates the manner in which any applicable noecomformity will be brought into compliance. a Any site requiring a site assessment, in the form of a site plan shall be submitted by Much 1, 1999, said plan subject to approval by City Council. ! - ' PROPOSED CORRIDOR ORDINANCE ' NON-CONFORMING LANDSCAPING I ) Landscaping: /.U legal nonconforming properties within the designated corridor shall provide landscaping by October I, 2003. The minimum requirement shall be in compliance with Sec. 31.7(1x&) Puking Lot Screening, perimeter screening (Ordinance 98.100) 2) Redevelopment: All requirements of+hls Condor Code shall be met in the event of demolition of an existing legal noo-conforming use. In accordance with provisions of Code of Ordinance Sec, 33-11(d), all requirements of this code shall apply if partial demotion exceeds 30%. , t ,r i 1 f yZ~1 1~ 1 _ yp 1' ~4 , ~ rt Fy t 4 1 I w 1 1 ~ < l'V 1 t 1 • t 1 a r `1, 11~ 69 32 X I o 25 4 f i P r Siea¢e r p''•'_ • Hill Country One free standing with 0.4 sq. feet per linear foot of frontage, up to a maximum of 64 sq. it., and 12 R above grade in height For all other signs, 10% of facade sea of the rust 15 R of be Ving height is required a Expressway Corridor One free stand'u,ct sign with 0.7 sq. foot per linear foot of fror age or 60 sq. R, whichever is la, qer, up to a maximum of 300 sq, ft. and a Max. height of 35 feet above frontage street pavement or 20 feet above grade at base of sign, whichever is bigher. Sacrnd Prairit $JgIIggG a Monument signs Size - 6 R in height and 8 ft, in width, with height increasing by 1 foot for each 50 R beyond 150 R of sign frontage up to a maximum of 20 R in height Sign area A maximum of 60 X of the monument alga structure free may be used to identify Oie business on that site. Identification - May only list project name and tenant activities. - Sign location - Must be located in a landscape setting. Combination - A series of contiguous properties may combine signage into a single monument, where the properties have been planned as it unified development. However j each individual property would not be allowed their own individual sign in addition to it comb fined sign. Number of Signs - Each lot may have one monument sign. However a mulG•tensmt complex comprised of more than one building, shall be. permitted one sign per building, provided that bt ildings separated by a distance of 60 R or less shall be considered a { single building. li - Spacing of Signs - Mo: ument signs must be spaced a minimum of 150 R. apat, and 60 .1. from am„ner lot. - -hangeable messages - Signs may include electronic-"y changeable messages which identify;pecial events on site 7 a Wall signs - Only on-site signage shall be allowed. - Sign area - the maximum area of all wall signs combined on one building elevation shall not exceed 3% of the total area of that elevation. q - Stay include canopy signs, and flat w&IVfaseis signs • Pole signs - Location • Prohibited in the district except that they shall be permitted AitHit 50 R of the I H 30 R.O.W. r - Size - No pol: sign shall exceed 300-sq. A of sign area on each of i:p to 2 faces. r Height - No role shall exceed 50 R to height Gam the grade of the adjo ent public load. Prohibited Signs - f ortable signs, window signs, roof signs, pole signs( except permi led by this section), 1 and billboards. a it North Richland Hill Max. height 25 A., max. sue 100 sq. R, major development pylon signs still ptnnitte,' provided 100,000 sq. R. floor space p t,' i 711 tr - - - y q2 A ' p 1 y aavDaseau ' EAU Preston Road Overlay District Signagg All freestanding speav,ent, general business, identification, institution, and multi-purpose signs shall be monument type. The copy are shall be framed on All four sides by at least 6 incl. 7 of masonry rock, or other materials compatible with an associated building's fascia. An additional three feet may be permitted for earthen berms, stone mounds or other landscape features if part of an approved landscape plan Maximum Height Maximum Size Maximum Co Size A artment sl ns SR. 35 S4. fl. 20 Sq A. General Business Signs 8 ft. 90 eq. A. iJ s . ft identification Signs 8 A. 125 s A. 100 sq. 11. Institution Sighs 811. 45 ft. SO s q. tt. Multi- uryoss Signs 12 A., 225 $q4 ft. Identification - 50 s q. L Directory - 70 s q. ft. Reader Board _30-sq. A tiew Orleans. Louisiana Bullud =e Urban Corridor District a 4cccssory Signs - Each business shall be allowed ailher one (1) flat or one (1) projecf.tg Sian. Sign Area - Allowable sign area computed one sq. foot per linear foot of tenest spree, man 70 sq. R. No sing shall project more than five (5) A. from the building. No acces.,:.y sing shall be erected above the parapet level of the main building. a Canop; Signs - Each business on the premises shall be allowed two (2) canopy signs with the area of each sign limited to six (6) sq. R. a Detached Signs - Each development shall be allowed one (1) detached sign - Sign Area - Allowable sign arcs computed one sq. foot per linear foot of street frontage. In a development containing less than two (2) acres the maximum allowable sign area is seventy (70) sq. R. The maximum allowable sign area for a development of over two (2) acres is 100 sq. fl. The maximum allowable height is twelve (12) ft. Highway Urban Cogidor Distrct a Accessory Signs- Each business on premises shall be allowed either one flat or one projecting sign. Sign area -Computed at one(1) square foot per linear foot of building width or M.vidual tenant space along the wall on which the business has its main entrance. Max 200 sq, ft. n No projecting sign shall extend five feet(S) from the face of the building. a Canopy Signs - Ea:h business shall be allowed two (2) canopy signs with the area of each dgn limited to etght(8) 54 A a Detached - Eachbuilditig shall be Allowed one it) e.-fached sip. i - Sign area - For a development conta' ,ing less than two (2) acres the Allowable area for each face of a double face sign shall oe computed at one (1) sq. ft. per linear ft, of street frontage, or 70 sq ft, whichever is less, Max. Height shall be thbty•five (33) R. t IVL~ 71 5 x 10 3z I~ 1 . s uereearri . rasearar ,k Propored Corridor Ordioance Signs A sign district shall be required for any property which has more than three bundred (300) feet of continuous frontage on a Gateway or Entranceway. The Site Pita shall conform to the provisions of Code of Ordinance Sec, 33.254 (2). All signs in the district must be designed to conform to regulations in Code of Ordinance, Chapter 33. *See Attached Amendment to City of Denton Code of Ordinance See, 33.146 Manner of Measurement (2) a. Curb Ilne me, emend - Measurement along a vertical line extended upward from f the nearest curb line ~ public street fronting the premises or from the edge of JbI oWW 1 ~ load fronting tf e. wernise where the sign is to be located. The horizontal line is the maximum height allowed at that location. f (2) o. IH-35 measurement - Along 1H-35, the height may be measured from the O aund when no fronage exists get-iteheiglNl lY .7 r; j F 1 kl ii .r 72 , + Y 1 32 x~ ~ 10 • alga" 0 I i 133-127 DENTON CODE Sec. 33127, Certificate of occupancy. The building official shall not issue a certificate of occupancy for any premises on which a sign or supporting structure does not meet the requirements of this chapter, (Ord. No. 93.029, 1 X11, 3.2.931 Secs. 33.128-33.145. Reserved. ARTICLE V. TECILYICAL REQUIREMENTS DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec, 33.148. Manner of measurement. The measurements required for signs by this chapter shall be made using the following procedures: 1( Setback. To apply the setback provisions of this chapter for signs at anyone ill point, the following measuring procedure shall be used: a. Draw an imaginary vertical line extending upward from the curbline of the premises; b. Beginning at any point on the vertical line, draw an imaginary horizontal line perpendicular to the vertical line and curbline and extending toward the prem. i ses; c, Beginning at the point where the vertical line intersects the horizontal line, measure along tLe horizontal line for the required setback. See section 33221. t2i Hright. The maximum height of is ground sign shall be determined by the method of measurement that allows the greeter height, as follows: i a. Curb line rneasurement, Measure along a verticai tine extended upward from the nearest curb line of the public street frontingthe premises where the tdgn is to be located, to the maximum height Allowed for the sign,. From that point, extend a horizontal line to where the sign Is to be located. The horizontal line is the maximum height allowed at that location. (See Appendix Illustration 14b) b 11f•35 measurement. Along IH•3,1 tl:e height may be measured from the principal lanes, the frontage road, or the ground, whichever allows the greeter height. iSee illustration 14bJ c, Neturof ground fecel measurement. At the highest point of the sign, draw s horizontal line to the outer extremities of the sign,. At the center of the horizontal lire, draw a vertical lint tothe natural ground level below. (The "natural ground 0 level" shall include any changes in topography necessary for development or the property.) The vertical line may not exceed the height allowed ror the sign at that location. (See Illustration 14b.1 Stipp No a 73 y,.; hx 0 32xIO o , aeesMaa . o 1 SIGNS AND ADVERTISING DEVICES 4 33.254 Sec. 33.253, Sign plan. The sign plan for the district shall show, in the form and manner specified by the depart- ment,thelocation, setback, size, dimensions, height oraltsigns regulated by this chapter, any other conditions, restrictions or regulations that will apply to the district, and any other information specified by the department, the commission or council needed to adequately evaluate the sign plan. Such information may include, but Is not limited to, information concerning the items noted in section 33.254, tOrd. No, 91.948, 4 XXXIV, 4.2.91; Ord. No. 93.029, 4 XXVI, 3.293) Sec. $3.254, Creation, review of plan, criteria. The council may approve the creation of a sign district for any property which has more i` than three hundred (300) feet of continuous street frontage on one 111 public street if it finds the district: (1) Provides & comprehensive plan for signs that would be clearly superior to what would be allowed without the plan; (2) Would be compatible with surrounding properties. In considering whether a district and sign plan is compatible and clearly superior, the commission and council shall consider, but are not limited to considering the following: a. Scale. The relationship between and compatibility of sign scale, site scale and the scale of nearby buildings, h. Color. The relationship between and comp-.6bility of sign color to the color of nearby buildings and landscaping: The degree to which sign colors are compli• mentary to their surroundings, c. Material. The materials of the signs and how they relate to their surroundings. d, Shape, The shape and design of the signs and how they relate to their surround. ings e, Landscaping. The relationship of signs to landuaped feature.o in and outside the district. f Traffic safety and traffic circulation, The impact of the signs on driver's view, the degree to which view obstructions Pre created or improved, avoidance of confu• • sion with or obstruction of traffic control signs and devices, and the time It takes a motorist to read the sign.. g. Mumination. The Impact and compatibility of sign illumination within the dis- trict and in relation to neighboring properties. The avoidance of glare and li.aht pollution, h, Integration. How the signs in the district are integrated I:ito a unified develop- meet concept with the topography, building design, other signs, landscaping, traffic circulation and other development features of tbedistrict and neighboring property. 13) Is not being used merely to avoid or gain a variance or the sign regulations; Sapp, No 9 74 i ,~5K10 32xi❑ N~ i ATTACHMENT 6 i r I. *u . !I 'i C ORRIDOR STUDY SI.JMMARIES X a: r~ i ! 1 r ` ~ }I. ,e^I 1 1 X Y i . l i J X, i .3 Y y ' 'T 11, 4 4 f r Y J \ 1 rR :I ,fir Ih 'i 75 t` X mr~' ~ ~ f Y ,y 25)( K -Lim ataaausa , 0 1 xa~aw y CITY COMPARISON SUMMARY - BY CITY Addison, Texas Street Lan dscsoe Bua I In all districts a twenty foot (20') landscape buffer strip must be provided along the entire length of the portion of the perimeter of the lot where a public or private street exist, exclusive of driveways and access ways at points of ingress or egress to and from the lot The property shall be responsible for landscaping, irrigation, and maintenance of any R.O. W area between the property line and the curb line, a Town 4LO.W should be included in the raenty foot (20') buffer and will reduce the amount of required landscaping area of the lot by that amount (square foot for square fool) s The minimum requirement for R.O.W. landscaping shall be one (1) 4 inch caliper shade tree end eight (8) shrubs for each twenty (20) linear feet of frontage. Plant material planted in the a7ect landscape buffer strip can be massed together to create visual Interest at key entry points of focal points. s One half the number of required shade hers maybe satisfied on a t%o•to•one basis with ornamental and evergreen trees. Bradford Pear or other pear cuttivars are considered ornamental trees under these landscape regulations. s All required screening, parking perimeter, and interior parking landscaping shall be included in the overall 20%ofgross site landscaping. a No tra. may be planted closer that two and one-half (2112') feet to the paved portion of any parking surfaces. a No tree planting area may be less than five (5) feet wide in any dimension and shall not ccntain less than twenty-five (23) square feet of continuous permeable land Qfl Street Loading Spaces -All off-sttect loading spaces on a site must be screened from all public and private streets adjacent to that site. s All screening must be at least six feet in height measured from the horizontal plane passing through the nearest point of the off-street loading space and may be provided by using any one or c. rntination of the following, subject to approval by an authorized Parks Department rcpresentative. s Evergreen shrubs planted three (3') feet on center, in a double staggered row; or s Evergrecn trees planted (6') six feet on center, unless authorized Parks Department approves an alternative planting density as being capable of providing a solid appearance within one year, a A fence, wall, or berm. Fences and w ails may not consist of eomrgated metal, corrugated fiberglass, sheet metal, chain link, or wi,e mesh or any material that Is in the Planning & Zoning Commission's opinion as unsightly material • If screening with an earthen berm, the berm must be planted with turf grass or ground cover ^ recommended by the Parks Department. The slope of the berm shall not exceed 33% (3: O for lawn areas and shall have a minimum cwwn width of 3 feet s Parkins Lot Scree=&- Screening must be provided for all surface parking lots on the site adjacent streets. The screening most extend slang the entire street frontage of the surface parking lot, exclusive of driveways and access ways at points. Of ingress and egress to and from the site; and visibility triangles. s Tht .arface parking lot careening must be it least three and one-half (15) feet higher thin the finished eltvatica of the adjacent parking lot. The screening maybe provided by evergreen shrubs, berm, fence or wall. 0 s Et ergreen shrubs planted three (3') fee on center in a double staggered row in a bed at least 36 O ~ inches wide. s A berm at least (2.5) two and one-half Teti m feet high with a slope not to exceed 33% ~4,j (3, 11 The minimum crown width must be three (3) fee 1. Berms must be covered in live vegetation. Plants used for screening on is berm must reach a minimum height of thirty (3D) inches within two years of installation and beat least eighteen (18) inches high when planted. 76 - } 2 x IC] 32xNO o ~eusowaa , • A fence or wall constructed of materials compatible with the principle building. One third of any fence or wall must be screened with acceptable plant material. Austin, Texas Hill Country Roadwa ' rrldor - All land within Austin's zoning Jurisdiction located within 1,000 ft. from each side of the public right-of-way of the following roadways: Loop 360 from Hwy, 290 W to US 183, RM 620, from SH 71 to Anderson bfill Rd„ RM 2222 from Highland Hills Dr. to RM 620, RM, from Loop 360 to SH 71, and Southwest Pkwy, Nonresidential floor to area ratio -All nonresidential buildings :hall be lintited to & maximum Floor-to- Area Ratio computed by reference to slope gradients and intensity level as follows Intensity Level" Slope Oradient of Land Low Moderate High 0-I5% 29 25 .30 15.25% Og .10 .12 25.35% r 04 .05 .06 ••Intemity Zones Nigh Intent.' All land within 1.076or It.0w. ormolntenectina rate rraintained roadwaya,md wici, frontage 0. osh hfahwoya or on une highway and an inter ting arterial or collector roadway. Moderate Inter y - All land nor included in high intensity, with fronuge on designated roads Low Intensity - All land not ir.luded in mc&tate and high. Development Stud a Height - Max. permitted height may increase as the distance from the RA.W, increases. Within 200 R, no building shall exceed 28 ft. Beyond 200 ft , max. height may L :rease, but shall not exceed 28 ft. in low intensity, 40 A. in moderate intensity, end 53 A. in high Intensity areas. • Building materials - Design shall utilize, to the greatest extent, building materials compatible with the Hill Country environment, such as rock. stone, brick, and wood. Mirrored glass with reflectance greater than 20 % is prohibited, Landscape • Tree Removal - Each nee of 6" diameter or greater that is removed, the owner shall plant a sufficient amount of native species to reasonably compensate for the loss. a Highway Vegetative Buffer- In cases where the buffer area has previously been substantially disturbed, the buffer area shall be revegetatcd with native trees, shrubs, and grasses and up to SD°r; of buffer may be used for detentiowsedimentation poods and wastewater drain fields, subject to such restoration. • C learing - No clearing shall be allowed within 100 ft, of R.U.W., except for clearing accessaryto provide utilities and access to site, In rn case sball ve; elative buffet exceed 200/0 of the acreage of the applicant's property, • Preservation - At least 40 ?6 of the site, excluding dedicated E,O.W„ shall be left in a natural • stale, To meet this requirement, priority given to the protection of critical areas as identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Natural areas located within parking medians and the required llighway Vegetative Buffer may count toward this 40;16. 1 Ssts cd Parkins • Screening - All parking areas and detention andar water quality ponds shall use existing vegetation, or installed landscaping to screen pavement, vehicles, and ponds from the existing rr. udway and from adjacent properties. • Massing - This screening shall Include dense massing of bees in addition to existing native understory, vegetation, shrub massing, and berms. Traffic Access Requirements • Principal Roads - Direct access to a principal roadway Is prohibited if the iot bas less than 200 ft. of frontage. Joint access may be required for abutting lols, which have insufftclent frontage to allow a driveway approach. 77 I la 32XIII + It M, A , .awo.aa , o Ow" M I a Hill Country Roadways - Access maybe prohibited from any tract having access to a street intersecting with a Hill Country roadway which has access though an existing joint use access easement or driveway. If access is not prohibited, access is restricted to one driveway unless traffic volume exceed 1,000 vehicles per day, or a traffic impact analysis demonstrates need. No more than two access points shall be permitted. HilulagS a Hill Country - One free standing with 0.4 sq. feet per linear foot of frontage, up to a maximum or( 4 sq. A., and 12 R, above grade in height - For all other signs, 10% of facade area of the first 13 fl. of building height is required a Expressway Corridor One free standing sign with 0,7 sq. foot per linear foot of frontage or 60 sq. ft., whichever is larger; up to a maximum of 300 sq. ff and a Max. height of 33 feet above frontage street pavement or 20 feel above grade at base of sign, whichever is higher. Bedford, Texas RiehwayCorridorOvvlavDistrict- StateHigHighway Ill property included - 200 ft, R'O'W' Front Yard Setback - 30 ft. (may be on TXDOT ROW with written approval--up to 10 can be on R.O.W.) Prohibited Uses Any outdoor sales or storage as principle or accessory Automatic coin or attendant operated car wash Automotive glass, vim, or upholstery shop Automotive repair shops and garage, as principle or secondary use Chemical and allied products manufacturing and packaging Convenience grocery stores Convenience stores with a drise-thru window Dairy products manufacturing and,or wholesale Drive-in and drive-thru restaurant Gasoline sets ice stations heavy construction equipment and Implements Laundry, dry-cleaning 3 dyeing plants Massage salon Meat, fish, or poultry markets %letah and metal product manufacturing and assembly Mobile home, campers, and recreational vehicle sales ` Multifamily dwellings'epartmenm'condominiund Pawn shops Self-service storage facilities Sexually oriented business Textiles and fiber products 4A nolcsale automotive vehicle tquipmeni and estakl4hments Shared Access Required - Access to individual development shall be obtained througb mutual and cross access drives on-site. Multiple driveway entrances shall be prohibited, 11 Traffic Ctf :uladon Flan - A traffic circulation plan shall be prepared and provided, with the Specific Use Permit site pan, for all new development. o . LatL±pe buffet- 30-ft, front yard area a Must contain 3 trees of 3 inch c diper and 12 ft. in height 1 a All shrubs, Berms, or combination screen must be a minimum Mt height Develo went Standards a Buildings constructed or lW16 masonry i i 78 32 X s , O S l awatrwa • A pitched roof construction will be required on all structures 5,000 sq. R. or less • Design shall include relief to walls and roofs on all structures 5,000 sq A. or greater • Earth tones, pastels • Equipment screened with masonry aimilar to main s ucture • Ground mounted signs - 6it maximum height, 50 eq. it, maximum similar masonry material • Lighting Plan - Fixtures m rst hav maximum height of 30 R and the light must be directed toward the ground Nonconformity - All structures that art noncotJomring at the time of adoption of the "HC", or which are deemed conforming as a result of regulations, shah be subject to the following: • Existing uses that are legal uses in the underlying districts, but are caused to be nonconforming by the regulations of the "HC", shall be considered legally conforming uses, • All related non-conformities relative to Landscaping and Screening Regulations and Development Standards, shall be brought into compliance prior to March 1, 2003. This does not apply to structures that do not meet architectural standards. • Any site, which is nonconforming to the regulations listed in Landscaping and Screening and Development standards, shall subm t a site assessment, in the form of a site pion, which indicates the manner in which any applicable nonconformity will be brought into compliance. • Any site requiring a site assessment in the form ore site plan shall be submitted by March 1, 1999, said plan subject to approval by City Council. Maintenance Reguirements -Maintenance agreement approved by the City, shell be signed by the applicant'owner for maintenance of all landscaped areas, sidewalks, drive areas, and puking lot lighting The maintenance agreement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be filled for record in the deed of records of Tarrant County and binding on all owners, lessees, and successors. Includes maintenance orsidcwalks, lighting systems, parking, irrigation and sprinkler systems. Carrollton, Texas LQrrldor Concept Pla -A conceptual guide and gmual standard for addressing Carrollton'$ corridors as to image and physical appearance. The Plan's concepLi and technical recommendations require farther evaluation and analysis as to their appropriatene.s by each City department prior to actual implementation. Maior City Entrances • Plantings - Simple in bold linear, long single rows to make an impact at 65 mph are required. • Walls - Used to link intersections on either side of the interstate and state highway, with city logo • Entry space and walls - Lined with seasonal flowers and low evergreen 5sctia)~teessa a Identified by removed paved median and minimised median breaks • A historic light standard should be used in the median, with a new light standard functioning 1 as the only street light source a Street Trees should be planted 50' spar) in wider medians 0 • Brick paving flat Mork should fill narrow medians, between planters &gj~jj4j;i - Streets rumdrig through the mote cununercial adjacent uses, have fewer trees required in the adjacent R.U.W, and the tree palate is somewhat smaller. The need for clear unobstructed commercial graphics and signage provides for less trees to be planted in these corridor The placement of trees should tecogni2e the need fur view zones. Screened Parkins • Berm - 3' minimum height, and 24' minimum setback from street frontage • Wall - hrinimum 2' and max 4', constructed of materials that compliment architectural style 0 • Hedge - 2'.6' high, constantly maintained as clipped hedge 0 J • Loose screen planting - Minimum 2%6', staggered roe of shrubs specifying dwarf plant varieties • BernWall - Minimum 3' berm street side end a retaining will on the parking surface side 79 32X o arsawma 1 Colleyvifle, Texas Commercial Zoning Ordinance -Applies to all commercial and industrial development within the City of colleyvitle. Front Yard 5e back - 40 R. from property line. If parking is setback 40 ft, the builc,ng frontage maybe setback 10 R, from property lino Commercial Desia Des istrict -District Design Worksheets are a part of the site plan application package presented to the Community developmem staff along with, landscaping, parking, and civil engineering dranings for review prior to building permit review. The scoring system is designed to achieve a simple ! minimum number is low as ;Sin the Manufacturing District and too high 30111 the Village Retail District a Facade Articulation Variables -This rule gives points for breaking long facades by a variation in the building surface. a Vertical Departure Vanables - This rule gives points for breaking wails in she vertical such as , providing roof slopes. I Shade Coverage Variables - Points are awarded in this category for building facades that have projections or other features thet provide building shadows that visually break up long flat building facades, a Horizontal & Diagonal Roof Plane Variables - Decorative features, roof or wail designs like parapets, ridges, eaves, etc, that provide visual interest, will gain a small number of points, but can be useful to the designer as a tool to get the points needed. Fenestration Variables - _toors, windows, and other framed building openings help to break up the "bleak" look of & long blank wall Points are given for the amount of openings in a building surface. l leiuhi - Building height 2 stories max 35 ft Prohibited Uses Mobile home dwelling Farming &Livestock breedingRaising Public maintenance & storage buildings Solid Waste disposal sites I Railroad or motor freight terminals Transportation vehicle sturage yards or garages Automobile repair & storage w1 outside storage Warehouse and distribution Food packaging and manufacturing All other manufacturing ArShl9Siit[RI UuidtL=- Design formula, point system A Flower Mounds Texas EdulRAMttadagy - Designation given to the major Flower Mound roadways which will have a more suburbanized density of development, but which are of important significance in establishing and maintaining a quality image of the town. They are to have a high quality of landscape treatment and higher than normal landscaping to the roadside, including special pedestrian and'or hike and bike trail provisions. t Landsc m Sctback- 2Sdt. minimum from R OX S Landscape Arca - 20 % of street yard • Itee PlJr&Z J&tiss p I 11000 sq. R. @ street yard less than 0.2 S acre 112300 sq. R. (a sweet yard 0.23 to 23 acres ~J 1/5000sq. ft. @ street yard over 2 S acres Tree size - 2"caliper min. in street yard Street Trees - I per 304 frontage, 3" caliper so A 9K MIAM~MMALIMILAIJMMRU O 1 WAWA" Parking Area Landscape - 90 sq. fQ12 parking spaces Pa_rktng Area Trees -1 tree Mparking spaces, max : t?-fl. front any apace Pgjk gAreg Screening - Viewline 3A minimum, plants, ber ms, walls, or natural topography Equipment/ T a_ she Screening - 6-ft. nu-iimum, match building materials or plant Lodip@ SeN' a Screening- 6-fl. minimum, masonry wall or planting ' Senaration From Residential Use - 6-R minimum, masonry or planting Country Faadwav - These have enough sdditional R.O.W. available to provide drainage swale% instead of curb and gutwt, preservation of natural landscape, naturclized new landscaping and special recreational trail features, such is eques6iantrails. Landscape Setback- 25-fl. minimum j anlicoDe Area - 50% of street yard Tree Planting Ratios 111000 sq. A. @ street yard less than 0.25 acre 0500 sq. ft. @ street yard 0,25 to 21 acres 115000 sq. ft. @ street yard over 2.5 acres Tree size - 2" caliper min. in street yard Street Trees -1 tree per 30-It. of frontage, 3" caliper Parking Area Landscape - 90 sq. ft./12 parking spaces Parking Arco Trees - t tree 30/ parking spaces, max 50-fl, from any space Parking Area Screening -Vie wline 3-111. minimum, plants, berms, walls, or natural topography ` Ecuipment/ Trgsb Screening - 6-A. minimum, match building materials or plant f Loading Service Sc Iming - 6-ft. minimum, masonry will or planting S-eparationFromResidentialUses-6•n.minimurrmasonry or planting Scenic Roadway -Roadways which Bove the most impactor. the image of Flower Mound, whether through the quality of existing natural environment or the significance of the roadway no major entrance to the town. The scenic roadways are to have the maximum preservation of existing natural feature, trees, views, extensive landscaping of the roadside where it does not currently exist, and limitations on density of new dnrlopment within 1000 ft. of the roadway ccntcrtine. Landscape Setback - 504 minimum Landscape Area - 50°6 of street yard Tke; Planting Ratios No o street yard less than 025 acre 11500 sq. ft. @ street yard Tree size - 2" caliper min. in street yard Street Tree - I tree per 30-ft. of frontage, 3" caliper Parking Arco Landscape - 90 sq. fU l2 parking spaces Parking Area Trees- 1 tree 10/ parking spaces, max 50-ft, from any space 1 Parking Area Screening - Viewline 3-ft . minimurr% plants, berms, walls, or natural topography Equirmenh' Trash Scteenin¢ - 6.11. minimum, match building materials of plant 'F Loading Service Screening - 641. minimum, ma<oruy wall or planting . Separation From Residential Use - 6-ft. minimum, masonry or planting Design Guidelines - Reviewed by Planning Department i Grand Prairie, Texas $dtlint Corridor - Identified by City Council as a special district with the City of Orand Prairie. It inroivcs major invesuncnis by the City for economic development in both the creation of Lone Sur Park at Grand Prairie and the planning and manipulation of flood plain lands to create developable sites. @uilding Setbacks a Front Yard - 25 fl s Height - Unlimited, except must be a setback of 2 ft. for each 1 ft. In height from a lot in a t: residential zoning district 1)1 l 25)(10 32x10 , i I aawasw 0 I Perrrined Land Use Livestock sales Electrical substation- SUP Radio/Television Tower - SUP Water treatment plant Sewage pumping station Railroad passenger terminal Site Lavout • Parking Location - I bay (approximately 64ft plus landscaping) between front building face and property lines. Any additional parking shall be provided beside or to the rear of the building. • Circulation -joint access required to provide smooth flow of traffic S.Ii~lfttP.ing • Parking Lo's - Tree canopy - I tree for each 20 spaces, no parking located I00•A. from the center of tree - 3 inch trees, with minimum S ft. island (glass cover in island) • Screening of Parking - 3 A. high solid shrub, berm fence, or combination, In no case shall the slope of the berm exceed 3 1, unless it is being retained on the private property aide of the berm. • A minimum 3-A. berm t hall be used along both sides of Bel'ine Rd. its the screening method along this roadway, unless prevented due to unique site condition& atrettsc Dina - Minimum I tree for 40 A, frontage, 3" caliper • Placement of Trees - AV required street trees shall be placed between the future roadway curb line and the parking area or front building line, whichever is closest to the street R.O.W., however trees shall net be planted closer than 3 A. to the curb line Landscape Buffer - IS A. in width, parking may intrude to 8 f. provided the berm is not reduced Site LandscaM Area • Minimum Landscape Atea - Each developed site in the district shall maintain a minimum of 70"6 of the site in landscaping, The nuninmm maybe reduced to I s% of the site by the J planting o: additional trees. II • Reduction of Landscape Area - The amount of required landscaping may be reduced by 120 sq. A. for each 3" caliper shade tree planted. This does not include trees, which are required for parking areas or for strectscaping However, up to S0'/. of the trees provided under this + provision may be added to the parking lot or roadway landscaping areas. Two ornamental trees may be substinrted for one shade tree Site Access • Curb Cuts - One for tsery 200 ft of frontage. not closer 150 A. center line to center line • Joint Access - Required Architectural Soindards " s • !Materials - 85 °S stone , brick, glass, not to exceed 50% glass • Color - Pastel earth tones • Design -SuB!•.sied sample style elements • Signage - Signs regulated by size, location, and type 5it:~gs 1 • Monument signs Stu - 6 A. in height and 8 A. In width, i0r height increasing by I root for each 50 R. i beyond I so A. of sign frontage up to a maximum of 20 A. in height. Sign area - A maximum of 60 % of the monument sign structure face m.? be used to Identify the b+tsiness on that site Q rdentifcation - May only list project time and tenant activities. Sign location - Slust be located in it landscape setting. Mu►' - Combnation -A series of contiguous properties may combine Signage Into it single 1 monument, where the properties leave been planned is t untried development. However i 82 ,y y 10 A , r+rasac•e ~ ' 0 VVVAMM I i each individual property would not be allowed the it own individual sign in addition to a combined sign. - Number of Signs - Each lot may have one monument sign. Howeve: i multi-tenant complex comprised of more than one building, shall be permitted one sign per building, provided that buildings separated by a distance of 60 ft or less shall be considered a ` single building. - Spacing of Signs - Monument signs must be spaced a mi ,L-r, of 1:0 ft apart, and 60 A. from another lot - Changeable messages - Signs may include electronically changeable messages which identify special events on site I • Wall signs - Only on-site signage shall be allowed. - Sign area - The maximum area of all will signs combined on one building elevation shall not exceed 3% of the total area of that elevation. - May include canopy signs, and flat waltrfascia signs • Pole signs - Location • Prohibited in the district except that they shall be permitted within 50 ft. of the IN 30 R.O.W. - Size - No pole sign shall exk cod 300-sq. ft of sign area on each of up to 2 faces, - Height - No pole shall exceed 50 A. in height from the grade of the adjacent public too; • Prohibited Signs - Portable signs, window signs, roof signs, pole signs( except pertnitted by this section), and billboards. Review Process a Site Plan required, prior to building process. a Content of Site Plan- The site plan shall include such things as structure. streets, sidewalks, off-street parking and loading, landscaping and drainage, end buildings elevihuns specifying etltfT<e materials, color, and eignage. e Review Process - Chief Building Inspector and Planning Director shall approve site plan, or it may be forwarded to council, if there are substantial variances. • Content crReriew - Compliance with the intent of this zoning ordinance, including landscaping, fagade matctials, architectural style elements, screening regulations, setbacks, land use regulations, signage, parking, and any other standards. North Richland Hills, Texas 9LLQ1tt BIrd;Sp1Jdar Studv - The extension of Mid-Ciues Blvd. provides through access from Precinct Line Rd. to Rufe Snow Dr. The availability of the roadway and the quality of the Mid-Cities Bh d, Corridx will likely be a significant incentive frn development to occur along the roadway. The majority of the land within the study is undevelopr.d. In fact very little development has occurred since 1992. Lan~gcaDl21Y A a 50 4,' of landscape requirement should c nsist of shrubs, trees flowering beds, with majority in front yard area • Landscape buffer of S A minimum, if parking permitted in the front building line Area Parkins a Curbs pruvid:d on all parking surGues ' a Curb stops in all parking that "head in" to any landscape area • Parking rf vehicles prohibited within the building line set-back areas on lot a Skated uriva and parallel access dhves required 0 Smug a Max. height 25 ft , max. site 100 sq. ft major development pylon signs still permitted provided 100,000 sq. A. floor space Arch lectuta • Two story structures prohibited within first 10011. 83 +1c" , IQ 32XIfa ray 6 aaoamt . • Exterior surfaces should be brick or stone, concrete and stucco prohibited • Design of structures rust include relief to walls and roof, no single uninterrupted surface planes Prohibited Uses - Service uses and ntail uses that require large areas of outside storage are prohibited. Th se uses would include vehicle ear tots, rental facilities, auto t.-pair facilities, and self storage facilities. All permanent outside storage and display are also prohibited. Zoning,- Current Industrial and agricultural coned land use, should be changed to G2 or Rd, as directed by future land use map. Piano, Texas Dallas North J911"iX Corridor Minimum Front Yard - 50 fl. from frontage roads Minimum Side Yard - of comer lot, 50 ft. if on street side Maximum Building Height -Twenty stories, not to ex:red 323 ft., et cept as noted in other setback requirements. Maximum Lot Coverage - $0%, 700/t if s'ructured parking facilities are included Other Setback Rea uirem n . -In addition to front, side, and rear yard requirements, the following minimurn setbacks from residential zoning districts shall apply to all buildings as measured from the district boundary line of the nearest residential district a Front Yard Setback -A minimum of 50ftas measured fiom the property line or three times the height minus 30 A. as measured from the nearest residential district boundary line is required, whichever is more restrictive. Conversely, the allowed building height at I cerrain setback, would be equal to 113 the setbaJ plus 10 fl. a Building Height - A maximum of 8 stories or 14D fL in height, whichever is more restrictive, shall extend for a distance of 1,000 fl, from the nearest t esidential district boundary line. • Setback - Beyond the 1,000 ft., the setback shall increase at a rate of one times the height of that portion above 140 ff or eight stories, whichever is more restrictive, up to 323 A. in height or twenty stories, whichevtr is more restrictive. Building D<sien • Materials - 75 % of any exposed exterior will shall consist of glass, native stone, clay4'ued brick or tile, or a combination of these All exterior buildings made ofglass shall have a maximum exterior visible reflectance of 20 Color finish must be consistent with the remainder of the building, • Equipment - Roof mounted mechanical units shall be screened, Ground mounted mechanical units shall be srrcened from view by walls constructed of the same materials and finishes as the building of by a solid landscape screen These screens shall be a minimum of 6 A. in height. Plants must be placed so as to create it 6-fl. tall solid screen within two years of " installation • Open Storage -Not lobe located bet% ten building face and R.OX A maximum height not 0 to exceed height of screening. Not to exceed 10 % coverage of the lot area or 30 % of the main building gross floor area, whichever is more restrictive Shall be screened by & solid wall of the same type and manner of construction of main building. Csnrltled Use Electric Powet Generating Plant - SUP Llectricol Substation Sew age Treatment Plant- SIT Watcr Treatment Plant Shops, Orrice, and Storage Area for Public?rivste Utility t: Accessory Buildinf or Use ii heavy Machinery Sales and Storage Concrete/Asphalt Belching Plant-SUP General Manufacturing/ Inclotrial Use complying with performance standards-SUP i 84 . IT 7~ ;5„ 15. 10 32JO s , a ' l Limited Assembly & Manufacturing Use complying with performance standards Industrial Park - SUP Ljjg!cace Setback - 30 ft. from R.O.W. Lol d4eapin¢ - Minimum one 3"caliper tree and one ornamental (7 fl. planted height) per 50 ft. of frontage Screening - a Parking - Minimum height of 18 inches, shall consist of earthen berms, shrubbery or combination. Shrubbery hedges shall fo*n continuous coverage and retaining walls used for berming shall not exceed 40 inches in height within landscape edge Irrigation System - All landscaping musibe Edgated and replaced if damaged Maintenance -Long-term agreement, private property agreement should equal munic ipality level Preston Road Overlay District Property Included -All properties within 300 ft of existing centerline of Preston Rd. and all properties w ithin 300 ft. of the centerlines of intersecting major thoroughfares, except Highways 190 and 121. The district shall extend along said major thoroughfares for a distance of 1,000 4. from the centerline of their intersections with Preston Rd, Landsc pp Setback -A 30.4, wide landscaped edge from the front property line. Not to prohibit placement of driveway. Landscape edge maybe teduccd to 13 ft., if the combined width of the unpaved RO.W. and the landscaped edge is at least 404. Landscanin¢-A minimum or one 3"ca!ipershade tree and one 3" caliper ornamental tr et74. tall planted height) per 50 fl. of frontage, exclusive of driveways, Scieening a Parking - A m nimum of I8" in height, in those locations where the landscaped edge separates a surface parking area from Preston Road or another major thoroughfare. Landscape screen shall consist of earthen berms, shrubbery hedges or a combination. a Retaining Wall - May be used to facilitate berming if not visible from the str:et, shall not exceed 40 inches in height.. a Earthen Berms - Shall have a maximum slope of 4 ft, of horizontal width for every 1 A. of vertical height. a Shrubbery Hedges - Should form a continuous living screen Living screens, retaining walls, and screening walls more than 40 inches, but no greater than 8 ft. in height, may be placed beyond the required landscape edge snd'or the required front yard setback, whichevet is greater, Irrigation Systemx - Shall be installed to ensure maintenance of plant materials in a living A growing condition Landscape Plan - Including planting and irrigation details shall be submitted with the site plan review p[occss. Sigr a}yg- All freestanding apartment, general business, identification, institution, andmulti•purpose signs shall be monument type. The copy are shall be framed on all four sides by it least 6 inches of masonry n rock, nr other materials compatible with in associated building's fascia An additional three feet may be permitted for earthen berms, stone mounds or other landscape features if part of in approved landscape ~i . plan. f Maximum Height Maximum Size Maximumco Size Ada tment si ns 8 ft. 35 s q, IL 20 Sg. It Cleneral Business Signs 8 ft. 90 s 4. 70 a . R 1d02ritlcstion signs 8 ft. 125 s R. 100 !q. G. t Institrtion Signv 8 4. 45 IQ, 4. 30 14, A. I Mult -purpose Si ns 114.. 223 s 4. Identification - 50 . R _ Dreclo -70 .4. 0 Reader Bard -30-s q, R State Hwy, 190 (proposed] - 7o provide appropriate design standards for the development of properties within the State highway 190. These standards recognize the significance of SH 190 as a regional traffic AS far; 2.5 K 3 2 x I❑ d .arA~r ' o . l artery. Slate Highway 190 is a eight-lane highway with frontage roads u'-at provide limited access to adjacent properties. I_andsome Setback - Minimum 30 ft. from R.O,W., not to prohibit driveway opening, maybe reduced by as much as 15 ft. if the combined width of the unpaved R.O.W. AM the landscape edge is at least 40 ft Laiidscaoina - Minimum one 3" caliper shade tree and one ornamental tree( 7 ft planted height) per 50 ft. of frontage Screening a Parking - Minimum height of 18", shall consist of earthen berms, shrubbery or combined a Shrubbery bedges shall form continuous coverage and retaining walls used for berming shall not exceed 40 inches within landscape edge I Jmication Svslem - Installed to ensure maintenance Southlake, Texas ante Huzbway 114. FM 1709(Southlake Blvd).FM 1938 (Davis B! Al Prooertv Included -all properties which adjoin, art located within 100' of, or which provide for vehicular access to SH 114, FM 1709, FM 1938 or properties along the east side of Carroll Avenue between SH 114 and 1709. Building Setback- Applicable properties within the corridor overlay zone must maintain front building setbacks equal to or greater than (a) 50 feet. Landscape Slander -Areas of landscape plantings called bufferyards shall be provided along any applicable right-of-nay. A recommended plant selection list Is provided, Additional landscaping, above and beyond the landscape ordinance, must be provided in the parking areas depending on the amount of parking provided between the building and the applicable right-of-nay, Mechanical Equipment Screen ag -All mechanical equipment or satellite dishes n, l be visually screened from the applicable rights-of.way of from property within 400' which is residentiab) toned or designated for t6dential use on the Land Use Plan. Loading A:ea Sctggpjng- Loading and service areas are limited to the side or rear of the buildings. A minimum 10 foot solid masonry screening wall must be provided to screen views of any loading docks from any applicable right-of-way and residentially zoned property or property designated as residential on the Land Use Plan, 114 hs Receptacle Screening - All trash receptacles shall be located outside of bafferyards and shall be screened by a minimum 8 foot solid masonry screen on four aides, allowing a gate on one side. Atchilectural DcsLo a Building Fagade Articulation - All facades which are visible from the applicable rights-of- way or are within 400 feet of residentially zoned propery or property designated as residential on the Land Use Plan shall provide horizontal and vertical articulation to break-up the facades. Horizontal Articulation - No buildings facade shall extend greater than three (3) times the wall's height without having a minimum offset of 15% of the mall's height, and such offset shall continue for a minimum distance equal to at least 25% of the maximum a length of either adjacent plane. - Vertic.! Articulation - No horizontal w 'I shall extend for a distance greater than three (3) times the height b) a minimum of 151,8 of the %ill's height, and such height change shall continue rot a minimum distance equal to at least 25% of the maximum length or vulier adjacent plane a Masonry Requirements - Facades which are visible frum applicable rights-nf~way or from property within 400 feet zoned residential ordesignated as low ormediumdensity residential on the Land Use Plan, such masonry requirements %bill exclude the use of cement, concrete tilt wall, and other masonry materials of similar characteristics. In addition the us: of standard 0 concrete block hall be limited to lVia of any facade visible from adjacent public right-of-way; f and stucco or plaster shall only be allowed when applied using a 3-step process over diamond y metal lath mesh to a 718' inch thickness, or by other process producing comparable stucco s finish with equal or greatet strength and durability specifications. a Exposed Cot inns -All exposed structural support columns must be constructed of or clad in the same masonry material as the principal structure. 86 loom" i O alb I i I a Architectural Fencing -All fencing which runs parallel to the applicable rights-of--way must be constructed of the primary masonry material of the building, wrought iron, or living plant , material and shall provide for a minimum offset of 6 feet every 60 feet of wall. • Reflective Glass -No more than 50% of any building faqade maybe reflective glass having a reflectance greater than 10%. • Height - The height of any applicable building shall meet the requirement of the underlying zoning district unless adjacent to residential property - then the building shall be controlled by a height limitation line having a ratio of 4:1 from the property line. par ing Lot Impacts - The parking lot landscape areas shall be modified as follows based on the percentage of parking located between the building facade and the R.O.W. Less than 25% - 13 sq, ft per parking stall • 15%.73110- 19 sq. R. per parking stall ` Greater than 75% - 23 sq. R. per parking stall "'Where parking is provided between the building setback line and public R.O.W., shrubs obtaining a mature height of three (3) feet or greater must be planted at a minimum spacing of thirty inches (30") on center continuous along all paved edges of the parking or drive areas, Permitted Uses - Permitted uses shall be in accordance with the underlying toning district. However in C- 2,12-3, and e•4 districts, tires, batteries, and automobile accessory sales, provided that such activities occur entirely within the confines of the business structure itself and nursery yards may only be allowed as a specific Use Fermis. New Orleans, Louisiana flullard Avenue Urban Corridor District - The purpose of this district is to provide for a superior environmtent along a portion of Bullard Ave , a major transportation corridor in Eastern New Orleans, through the concept oroverlay zoning district, These special regulation Include size design requirements intended to complement land use do elopment and to establish a positive design image along the corridor. Front Yard Setback - 20 ft. from R O. W Landscape Suffer - Within 20 A. from R.O. W, with trees planted one per 25 linear feet of street frontage L Winst - No fixtures taller than 23 ft. Sctcenin a Parking -?V to 54" above top of curb elevation, must provide overall continuity, may be masonry wall or earth berm • Storage - Refuse storage enclosed by an opaque screen minimum 6 R, in height Inlcrix la, j5cayjng- Landscaped areas within the interior of the vehicular use area shall be provided when the area is over 3,000 sq fl., shall occupy 8% of total vehicular use aces, and shall be at least 100 sq. 0. in area. the length of any side shall be five (5) R The Interior landscape areas shall have raised curbs, with an approved tree planted at minimum of one (1) tree per 100 R, of interior landscaping. Fetimeter Landscape Stria- To clearly delineate boundaries of vehicular use areas, shall count as ' pan of 8% interior landscape . Vehicular Stone S'ards - Landscape requirements in this otdinance do not apply to automobile vehicular storage yards The following criteria shall be used in determining compliance, j a A vehicular storage yard shall not be accessible to vehicular traftic of the general public. • Any vehicular storage yard shall be located behind the minimum building setback of fifty (30) 1 n. • Any vehicular storage yard shall be enclosed with an opaque fence having it minimum height of six (0) feet. A wooden feac: r masonry wall maybe used to satisfy this requirement, a Within the twenty (20) foot landscape buffer, there may be located "outomd ie display path" - Only one (1) automobile display pad per 100 linear foot of street frontage. 0 0 - Any out-mobile pad shall setback ten (10) feet from the R.O.W., and contain sufficient area for one (1) auto mobile Any auto mobile display pad shall be setback a maximum height of three (3) ft, above curb elevation 87 Awl 1! ~r r A ! K, I M1.J 32X10 e wraxraa (l] I 1 +ta'allaal - Except for permitted automobile display pads , all other landscape requirements in this ordinance shall apply to the required landscape buffer zone in any automobile dealership, ~i,nags • Accessory Signs - Each business shall be allowed either one (1) flat or one (1) project'ng sign. - Sign Area - Allowable sign area computed one sq. foot per linear foo, of tenant space, max 70 sq. ft. No sirg shall project more than five (5) ft. from the building. No accessory sing shall be erected above the parapet level of the main building. • Canopy Signs - Each business on the premises shall be allowed two (2) canopy signs with the area of each sign limited to six (6) sq. A. • Detached Signs - Each development shall be allowed one (1) detached sign - Sign Area - Allowable sign area computed one sq foot per linear foot of street frontage. In a development containing less than two (2) acres the maximum allowable sign area is seventy (70) sq. ft. The maximum allowable sign area for a development of over two (2) acres is I DO sq. (t. The maxintum allowable height is twelve (12) R. Ii¢hwav Urban Corridor District - The purpose of the district is to provide a cuperiot environment along a portion of 1.10 and 1.510 Urban Corridors in Eastern New Orleans through the application of an overlay district. The overlay district regulations are intended to supplement the regulations of the underlying (base) zoning districts and to provide harmony and compatibility of development over it portion of the length of the 1.10 and 1.510 Urban Corridors. Front Yard Setback -1 S ft from R.O W. Landscape Huffer - 15 ft., may include utility R.O.W, trees planted one per 25 linear feet of street frontage SS.tSSni0ir • Parking - 36" to 54" above top curb elevation, must provide continuity, may be masonry will or earth berm • Storage - Refuse storage enclosed 6 ft. opaque screen with gates • Loading Areas - Screened by wood, brick, or masonry 6 ft. minimum Ljghfiag - No fixtures taller than 25 ft. Intetior Landscaping - Landscaped areas within the interior of tb A1cular use area shall be provided m ben the area is over 5,000 sq. R., shall occupy 8% of vehicular area, and shall be at least 1100 sq. R. in area. The length of ant s;de shall be free (5) ft. The interior landscape areas shall have raised curbs, with an approved tree planted at ninimum of one (1) tree per 100 A. of interior landscaping, Pcrintetct Landscape Strit- Shall count as partof the minimum eight (8) % interior landscape area. A landscape perimeter strip rv! h a minimum width of five (5) ft. is required along the outer edge of a vehicular use area, gt@A Lot (luffer Strip - Minimum depth of S ft , one tree per 25 linen feet, three shrubs per tree required V i )at $torage Yards -Landscape requirements in this ordinance do not apply to automobile vebicular storage yards The following criteria shall be used in determining compliance. • A vehicular storage yard shall not be accessible to vehicular traffic of the general public. • Any vehicular storage yard shall be located behind the minimum building setback for the site. • Any vehicular storage yard shall be enclosed with ar opaque fence having a minimum height of six (6) feet. A wooden fence or masonry wall mr.y be used to satisfy this requirement. • Withir the fifteen (15) foot landscape buffer, they: may be located "automobile display pads' j - Only one automobile display pad per 10( linear foot of street frontage - Any automobile pad shall setback len (10) fee( from the R.O,W., and contain sufficient area for one (1) automobile Any automobile display pad shall be setback a maximum height of three (3) ft. above curb elevation Except for pettru led automobile display pads, all other landscape requirements in this ordinance shall apply to the required landscape buffer zone in any automobile dealership. 88 5 K Io 32XI❑ s 0 i ATTACHMENT 7 ZONING 13548 diate vicinity has within the sal. 'r-month period been changed or acted on by the board or city council so as to alter the facts and conditions upon which the previous board action was based, as determined by the board. Such change of circumstances shall permit the rehearing of an appeal by the board prior to the expiration of a six-month period, but such conditions shall not have any force in law to compel the board, after a hearing, to grant a subsequent appeal; such subsequent appeal shall be considered entirely on its merits and the peculiar and specific conditions related to the property on which the appeal is brought. (Ord. No. 94.078, 11, 5.3.94) Sec. 3347, Remedies available from an appeal At a public hearing relative to an appeal, any Interested party may appear before the board in person or by agent or by attorney. The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to ' establish the necessary facts to warrant favorable actin, of the board on any matter. Any action granting a variance authorizing the issuance of it building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be valid only for a period of six (g) months from such action, unless said building permit or certificate of occupancy is secured in the six-month period, in which event the action shall be permanent, The board shall have the authority to grant a longer period. If said building permit or certificate of occupancy is not secured within the six-month period, or within any extended period granted by the board, the action of the board shall become void without prejudice to a subsequent appeal and such appeal shall be subject to the same regu- lations and requirements for hearing as herein specified for the original appeal. (Ord, No 94.078, 13 1, 5.3.94) f Sec, 35-48. Nonconforming uses and structures. (a) Amortisation of nonconforming uses. The board may require the discontinuance of nonconforming uses of land or structure under any plan whereby the full value of the structure and facilities can be amortized within a definite period of time, Wiling Into consideration the general character of the neighborhood and the necessity for rll property to conform to the regulations of this chapter. All actions to discontinue a nonconf firming use of land and etrue- ture shall be taken with due regard for the property rights of the persons affected when cons dered in the light of the public welfare and the character of the area surrounding the 0 designated nonconforming use and the conservation and preservation of property The board shall, from t ime to time, on its own motion or upon cause presented by the city er an aggrieved person, inquire into the existence, continuation or maintenance of any noticcn!nrnming use within the city (b) Criteria for determining amortization period. Before the board may determine an j amortization period, it must consider the following factors: (1) The owner's capital investment in the structures on the property at the time the use became nonconforming, (2) The amount of the investment rew,zed to date and the amount remaining, If any, to to recovered during the amortization period, SUPP nos 89 ./!rt Y 1 10 32 X I O Saw" o , 4 1 WOW 435-48 DENTON CODE (3) The life expectancy of the investment. (4) The existence or nonexistence of lease obligations, as well as any contingency clauses therein permitting termination of such leases. (5) Removal costa that are directly attributable to the establishment of a termination date. (6) Other costa and expenses that are directly attributable to the establishment of a termination date. (c) Discontinuation of nonconforming uses. (1) If the board establishes a termination date for a nonconforming use, the use must cease operations on that date and the owner may not operate it after that date unless it becomes a conforming use, (2) The right to operate a nonconforming use terminates if the nonconforming use is discontinued or remains vacant for six (6) months or more. The board may grant an exception to this provision only if the owner can state an extreme circumstance that demonstrates that there was not an intent to abandon the use even though the use was discontinued for six (6) months or more. (3) A nonconformiog use terminates when the structure housing the use is destroyed by the Intentional act of the owner or his agent. (Ord. No. 94-078,11. 5.3-94) Sec. 35.49. Restoration of nonconforming use. The board may authorize the reconstruction and occupancy of a nonconform!ng structure, or a structure containing a nonconforming use, where such structure has been damaged by fire or ether causes to the extent of more than fifty (50) percent, but less than the total, of the replacement cost of the structure on the date of the damage. The structure trust be restored or reconstructed so as to have the same approximate height and floor area that it had imme- diately prior to the damage or destruction. The property owner has the burden of proof to establish the height and floor area of the structure immediately prior to the damage or de- struction. A restoration or reconstruction in violation of this paragraph immediately termi- nates the right to operate the nonconforming use. (Ord. No. 94.078, 11, 5.3.94) Sec. 33.50. Nonconforming structures, (a) A person may renovate, remodel, repair or rebuild s nonconforming structure without J14. board approval if the work does not increase the degree of nonconformity nor enlarge the nonconforming structure. A person shall comply with all applicable codes and ordinances when renovating, remodeling or repairing a structure housing a nonconforming use thrt has been approved by the board. Supp No s 90 F 'K 10 32XIO' NNW A i 0 ,VOW'" 1 ' j ~I I I ZONING 13"1 i (b) The right to rebuild a nonconforming structure terminates if the structure is destroyed by the intentional act of the owner or the owners agent. If a nonconforming structure is ' damaged or destroyed other than by the intentional act of the owner or owners agent by lees than fifty (50) percent of the replacement cost of the structure on the date of the damage, a person may restore or reconat-uct the structure without board approval. (Ord. No. 94-078, { 1, 5.3-94) Sec. 35.51. Variances. (a) A variance may be granted when the board fords, (1) That there are @peel&I circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance Is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or building and do not apply generally to land or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or building; and (2) That the granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood In which the property Is located; and (3) That the granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance as granted by the board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and ( 4 ) That the literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of this ordinance will result in an unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of this ordinance and that in granting such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done. (b) In granting any variance under the provisions of this article, the board may designate such conditions in connection therewith which, in its opinion, will secure substantially the purpose and intent of this ordinance. (c) The board may permit such variance of the frcnt yard, side yard, rear yard, lot width, • lot depth, coverage, minimum setback standards and landscaping where the literal enforce- ment of these provisions would result In an unnecessary hardship, and where such variance is necessary to permit a specific parcel of land which differs from otherparcels of land in the same district by being of such restricted area, shape or elope that it cannot be developed in a manner commensurate with the development permitted upon other parcelsof land in the aamedistrict (d) A variation from the standards established by this ordinance shall not be granted to relieve a self-created or personal hardship, nor for financial reason only, nor shall suct. mod. • ification be granted to permit any person a privilege in developing a parcel of lend not per- mitted by this ordinance to cth^r parcels of land in the district. (Ord, No. 94078, 11, 5.3-94) 1 I , .1❑ 32xl❑ MEN& WARM 0 .135-52 DENTON CODE h Sea 35.52. Special exceptions. (a) A special exception may be granted when the board finds that: (1) The exception is in harmony with the ordinance; (2) The public welfare and convenience are substantially served; (3) Neighboring property is not substantially injured; (4) Exceptions will not alter essential character of the district and immediate location; and (5) The exception will not weaken the general purposes of the regulations. (b) In determining its finding, the board shall take into account the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the numberof persons residing or working in such building or upon such land, traffic conditions in the vicinity, and conformance of such area to the Official Zoning Map and comprehensive plan. (c) In granting any special exceptiun under the provisiots of this ordinance, the board may designate such conditions in connection therewith which, in its opinion, will secure sub- e.antially the purpose and intent of this ordinance. (d) The board may, after public hearing and subject to the conditions and safeguards herein contained, authorize special exceptions to this ordinance, limited to the follow rng: (1) The board may allow a change from one nonconforming use to another nonconforming use when: (a) The change of the use does not prolong the life of the nonconforming use; and (b) The change of the use is to a more restrictive clasacation. When a nonconform- ing use is changel to a nonconforming use of a more restrictive classification, the building or structure containing such nonconforming use shall not later be re- verted to the former lower or lees restricted classification. The board may estab- lish a specific period of time for the conversion of the occupancy to a conforming use. (2) A person shall comply with all applicable codes and ordinances when renovating, remodeling or repairing a structure housing a nonconforming use that has been ap- proved by the board. (3) A person shall not expand a nonconforming use beyond the lot on which the use is located except the board may permit the person to provide off-street parking or load- ing spaces on another lot. (Ord. No. 94-078, 11, 5-3-94) • Sec. 355.3. Signs. The provisions of this article shall not apply to the regulation of signs. Appeals, variances and opecisl exceptions involving signs shall be heard by the sign board of appeals. (Ord. No. 94.076, 11. 5.3-94) i Says No 6 92 ( 25K10 32XIU r o LW' o I ATTACHMENT 8 EXCERPTED DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 27, 1928 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, May 27, 1998, at 5 30p m.. In the City Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 East McKinney, Denton, Texas, Present. Bob Powell, Carol Ann Ganzer, Susan Apple, Rudy Moreno, and Jim Engelbrecht Absent. Ellen Hoover•Scheru and Elizabeth Gourdie Present from Staff. Eddie Martin, Assistant City Attorney: Mark Donaldson, Assistant Director of Planning; David Salmon, Engineering Administrator, Wayne Reed, Planner I; Donna Bateman, Senior Planning Technician: Cecile Carson, Planner III The meeting was called to order at 5,30 p m. PUBLIC HEARING 111. Hold a public hearing and consider making a recommendation to the City Council concerning the Interim Corridor Ordinance. Commissioner Powell. Item 16-hold a public hearing and making a recommendation to the City Council concerning the Interim Corridor Ordinance. Ms Carson. Ms. Cecie Carson presented the staff report. Ms Carson. The Small Area Planning staff presented this to you in work session two weeks ego. We are on a schedule that is Included in your backup moieties for o public hearing this evening followed by a June 2 public hearing with the City Council, a June 9 work session with the City Council, end then a public tearing with the Council on June 18 T.A ordinance dself Is an Interim ordinance that addresses some specific area In The city, primarily as shown on the mar that was provided to you and on the overhead-for roadways that are c"Aside the Loop 288, 1.35 boundary . The ordinance would address specifically regulations related to setbacks, architectural materials end design, uses that would be visible from Corridors. traffic circulation plan, signs and nonconforming landscapes At this time, we do have a draft ordinance that Is In your materiel The ordinance that is provided has not been technically-all the technicaVlegol language approved by the Legal Department, but substantlvey it v.•auld stay the same depending on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission Based on the comments from the Commissioners at the work session, you will notice In the materials that you have several items that we have added as underlined materiels-specdicaly In the Statement of Purpose section, some clarification and an additional Hem regarding economic development Issues that could be pursued by having a corridor ` ordinance In the area of class fcicalion, we have recommended that there be two clessi8cations of roadways-one as gateways and the second as entranceways. The gateways would be those primary roads to the primary traffic- generating roads that take people through and around the city, specifically Interstate 35E, 35W, and north Loop 288 and 380 Mr Engelbrecht had suggested that we review extending the 380 sedan of the roadways to Include certain seclons Although we did not chanoe the information specificatly, we did add on this map-you can see a provision to consider by the Commission adding 380 to Primrose, and then 380 to Ruddell Street. In reviewing those sections of the road, we Identified that there are large sections of undeveloped property In this area that will be developing in Me future that this ordinance could apply to without resulting in a great number or nonconforming land uses PI the same time, Dallas Drive was also ment oned as a possible Inclusion in this area At this time, the stall would nol recommend including that section because according to our surveys, there are only two tracts of undeveloped property along that section, which would put a majority of that roadway Into a nonconforming status In that particular case, the road might be considered once we have an interim ordinance adopted and could kook at specific roadways that are within the Loop 288 internal area or the street area inside with the Comprehensive. Plan. 0 In the provision section of the Codes, there are details regarding setback requirements, We do propose for t gateways a 25-fool setback and for entranceways a 15-foot setback. The landscaping that would be required in this u would be in proportion directly 10 the amount of landscaping that would be required on that property, So, nd additional landscaping would be required, but we would ask [hat 0, for example, 10% of the property Is pail of that setback area, then 10% of the tendsceping that would be required by ordinance 98.100 would be required in that .r 93 it y o ' o - I , Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes May 27, 1998 Page 2 of 7 setback area In regardi to architectural standards and materials, we do have recommendations regarding maleriair tar stone, cast atone, stucco, brick, limestone, grantee, and similar masonry types of matdrialf. We do recommend a Imitation on the amount of glass to not more then 50% or less than 20%, so that you would have some reflection along those entranceways but not have total glass-front buildings. The design standards that are proposed for you In Exhibit Aare from the City of Southiske They provides minimal requirement of relief along the frontage of s building so that you would not simply have flat-front and fat-roof buildings but would require some gradation In the front of the buildings or the top of the buildings themselves. Screening would be required for mechanical equipment and loading docks and vehicle service bays. There is also a proposal for certain uses that are listed on page seven and on page eight that would be slowed but would be required to have Imbed visibility. In such, they would have to be designed so that they would not be visible from the roadways, There is also a provision related to outside storage of merchandise and materials This would be also In compliance with certain regulations IhM are also currently Included In the landscape ordinance as well-that would require all merehmdise activities that w ould be visible Irom these streets be contained inside Vw building and not be located where they are visible from the corridors. Mr Clark has provided some language that's s8gri different from what you may have seen In your work session materials for traffic circulation plan to try and minimize along these eorrldons the socess onto those roadways because, obviously, the main purpose of these roads Is to move traffic, and we are trying to develop a planning mechanism where we could limit the seem points to rsduca congestion along those roadways Nonconforming properties on page nine of the ordinance-specifically in dam one under lands'-wiping-ft suggestion or recommendation from staff Is a minimum perimeter parking-requirement screening me per ordinance 98.100 and that this be accomplished for all nonconforming uses by the year 2003. The redevelop sedan regards properties that might be destroyed or demolished, In which ease, these provfslons of this coda would be applicable If partial destruction -weeds 50%. That is a sland,rd that is currently In our zoning ordinance, but we restated that hero for elarificstlon that this ordinance would apply. 'n regards to signs, we are proposing that the provisions of the sign district, which are located in the existing Cry of Denton sign w6rience, be required M properly has more than 300 feet of frontage. Currently, that Is on optional provison, and we would recommend that k be considered an actual requirement of this particular Interim condor code. And finely, In the tat sedan under signs, we recommend an ahering of the existing language to massure the height of the signs from the existing roadways or frontage roads, rather measurements from N ones of Interstate 35 primarily Primary reasoning for this Is In our research that's also shown to you in the back, that the signs are ranging In height from 50 to 80 feet along these corridors which Is in many ways Inconsistent with other developments along Interstate 35. From a visual perspective and actually from se advertising perspective, the height requirements measuring from the ground level would still provide adequate . owing of those particular signs. Some of the Commissioners also mentioned an Interest in a public Improvement plan that would coincide with this As you will note on the staff report sheet, that Is something that we do plan to couider a s@ follow-up to this interim ordinance. A public improvement plan would be considered, and elements of that could include landscaping of right-of-ways and medians, consideration of ways that we could actually provide logo signs (which you mov see In Lewisville and on your way to Fort Worth at Alliance Airport) that are currently not slowed within the oily lmhs of Denton, increased maintenance of our roadways, possibly directional signs (which was recommended by the Entranceway Committee of the Won project), lighting and also sidewalk standards There was also a comment about Incentives that might be offered In meeting that landscaping provision One of the options that we are considering for that pi 'o Improvement pion would be requesting mal,:hing grant funds from TxDOT for actual placement of screening and landscaping along those •uelways in the right-of-ways Y6is Is something that since 1981 the City Council has recommended that we do any I,, a there is a widening or an shoring of a roadway that Is U.S. or FM designated It Is how we did the landscape medians on UnNers4j from Malone Street to 1.35 and the landscaping [ho' was done on Teasoy Lane, FM 2181 from 1-35 south. So, that would be a possible way to address that Incentive process-to have certain ruade ldentfxd and a plan proposed to [he Texas Department of Transportation. Michele Lazo Is here again this 3 evening, who did a great deal of the research In the backup materials that you have, Dcth of us will be available to answer any questions that you may hove Commissioner Powell. Any questions of Ms. Corson? Yes, ma'am Me Ganter. Cecile, ten me again why we are not including Dallas Dove on that? Because I see traffic: constently Q coming QM of 1.35 onto Dann DrNe. To me, that Is another entrance Inlo the city, which M is a major entrance. I do not understand why-I heard what you said, but I stir do mot under'and M. Me, Canon. I understand We have added a few roadways, Initially, we baked only N arose [hat were going to be outside Interstate 35 or Loop 188-primarily because of the amount of developed versus non-developed property i 94 i r O sasaares ' ' O ramie I Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes May 27, 1990 Page 3 of 7 that the ordinance would actually apply to On Highway Ti w Dallas Drive, with the exception of what 1 currently Identify as [coo undeveloped Me, this ordinance would not apply unless there was major reconstruction or demolition of existi ra butd'vogs. So you would have.... Ms. Ganzer: So, unless some of that ugly stuff that's there now, we gel rid of that.... Ms Carson: That is right, Ms. Gamer Then, okay; I understand that. Ms. Carson. So, the thought or We particular ascil Is that this would be something that oould be add'Heed with a Comprehensive Plan. Once that's adopted and discussed with acme of the issues about streets, then that mgnS be an area where we could work on parkway landscaping or other alternatives other than last the private property that would be affected by an ordinance such as the one proposed today. Ms Ganzer: Okay, Ail right; thank you. Commissioner Powell: Any other questions? Yee, Mr. Engebrecht, Mr. Engsbrecht: We know that the State Highway Department is coming up to the Loop with 390 on the east. And than they arses I understand, they're going to mow forward from 268 westward. Do we he" a timetable that they have prosenled to us for that work moving westward? f Ms Carson: We do have a somewhat 6mtative schedule Mr. Clark has presented some Information. They'll actually be doing same preliminary work on elrenng some of lye turn lanes on 360 In this westernmost sectim In the next year, but cis actual widening of the road wonT occur until alter tit year 2000 IS willbegin on the east side and work Its vrey west through tit city for completion. We ors still talking two to three years for the work to begin and to continue across lowarda the western edge of the city Mr. Engelbfecht Okay; k wus just my thought-I do not know to what extent would rAe lrontagea of sny of this be Impacted by the chsnging of that roadway and, therefore, would we want to change the delta for those existing businesses to come In compliance at 14 point at which the road is completed? 1 don't know. I'm just asking M I [here Is any need to do that. Ms. Carson: That Is som thing that we could research. Most of the-from our undenlanding, eapeWlty In the weelern section of the roadway from Carroll Boulevard and working wool, the dust widening wail occur In the { median it is M . Mr Engelbrecht. Okay i Ms. Carson. ...so there will be very little actual change in that odsr edge except with the possible movement of utility lines Mr Engelbrocht, Okay; to n wouldn't matter? Me Carson If anybody else has any other comments, they are welcome, Mr Salmon may have acme more l sformation on that Mr. Engelbrechl. M part of this also-do you know where we stand when the lighting ordinance that is in the process to limn up lightv.g? w Ms. Carson We did not address k speoifkeit 0 this . Mr. Engebfecht, I know 0 a Ms Carson .because R was covered me a separate ordinance Mr. Engelbrecht Right, will M be coming along soon behind this? f 9 5 ~ ~'r S ' axes" p , D VAVWJs Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes May 27, 1998 Page 4 of 7 Ms. Carson: It Is in the processing. I donl have a specific time schedule for that. But If has h!" indicated to us from Council that that would be on Issue that we would be working on. Mr. Engelbrechl Soon; all right. So, no necessity to put some IMIe statement In here a>oct,..7 Ms, Carson: Correct. Mr. Engelbrechl, Okay; thank you. Commissioner Powell, M/ other questions of Ms. Carson at this time? Ms Carson. I should oleo-I am sorry, I noticed that Mr, Moreno had also asked us about a Chamber meeting, and 0 you will notice on your schedule we do rave that scheduled for 7:30 a m. on Friday morning. Mr. Engelbrechl: Yes; an Issue came up this evening. We have a-and I did not exactly to that In here -S there something In here about a 50-foot buIII line? We have a 254ool..,7 Ms. Carson Not In this particular ordinance. We use the 25-foot setback, which Is a currant requirement in our zoning ordinance for most properties-for a setback requirement but not for a Is illding line I think that I woo a proposal on one of your earlier publro hearings Mr. Engerbrechl, It was, and h is not exactly etear to me hi was assuming shat that got in-was made a cond'ocia by the s!aN based on this, but 8 Is not In hen, I am not sure, d Mark could also explain, where that came from, how that Is related to this :'A not ash him earlier Mr Donaldson That particular corsddinn came from,.. I Mr Engelbrechl, Did it just come from that other ase? Mr. Donaldson ...from that Baruch property,.. Mr. Engelbrechl Okay. Mr Donaldson: which was much In anticipation of the corridor ordinanca end more of a guess, having been done like sls of seven weeks ego, Mr Engelbrechl Yes; right So, we do not have s 50-toot setback requirement on this? Mr Donaldson No. Just the Mf Engeibracht. Just the 25-fool Mr. Donaldson landscape Mr. Engelbrecht. Yes, I wanted to ask you earlier about Thal, but I would do a now-because we have some al 40, which was pointed out to us, and so we wsnl to be consistent. N we are going to have some line, what have we e been using In the past, and Is 8 tonsistenti We do not have one, to that Is fine, Ms Corson. No, that Is the reason why ors use the 2S-loot, because thal N the consistent requires tent typically in our zoning ordinances-this 25-foot setback requirement. You w ll And, even on Unhini Drive, there are soma segments of what was formally PDA that have upwards of Mfoot before Pis building an actualy, be constructed because of to,ssideroloon of what the widening of that road might have been from 1989 forward s • Mr Engelbrechl Right. okay, thank you . Commissioner Powell. Any there other questions? Rudy? I have one of two. I was not M the work session, so some of these questions might be redundant, and if to, I apologize, Subject--hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on the Inter m Corridor Ordinance. Why Is It abed an Inferlm-Intoon between what? 96 32 X s s~aae.aa c l Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes May 27, 1998 Page S of 7 Ms. Carson: The ordinance that we have is very general In As approach because we're dealing with roadways that are very different, such as Interstate 35 and 2181 or Hcrth Locust Street. We are considering this an Interim ordinance. We would fill to have an opportunity to come back In the future, possibly after the Comprehensive Plan, and look at some of these roadways in more detail and more specifically address Issues that might affect that roadway that do not anted one of the other roadw a, For example, 35W has no service roads now on that roadway. A corridor study for that particular rood might take Into account more specific about how circulation might occur along that Interstate section to be quRo different from 3SE Ong south. Commissioner Powell Thank you. Down at the bottom of page one-fiscal inlormitloi - does not exactly go slang with what you said earlier. If I read this-the city does moll have any plane to spend any money to accomplish this-B I read this correctly, tBut I am guessing that people that own property along these a9seways, roadweye, co .klors are going to have to spend money by the year 2003 or whatever. Can you explain that to m67 Ms. Carson: The current policy that we have of-Ihe Council has provided direction on--11 that anytime that a roadway that the Taxes Department of Transportation would have authority over Is being widened or worked on, that we would consider requesting a matching gram on that roadway to do some type of landscape knprovements Al this time, the only one of the roodweye that we are showing as part of this program that Is under that Core schedule that would be considered Is U S. Highway 77. There hasn't, to my knowledge, been a spedfk dollar amount committed by the City as to how a matching gram would be done. So, we do not have an axed dollar amount. We are suggesting, as part of the reoommandations, that property owners who are In noncompliant provide perimeter parking screening by the year 2003, and that, technically under ordinance WWII, would have to been done on private property and not on the public property. But that could be one of the considerations that we could put in as part of our public Improvement processes-how that TxDOT funding request might be matcMd to I provide additional landscaping on some of these corridors So, there's not a financial commitment that we are making all this time, but it is part of our policies to do that. Commissioner Powell, If that were to happen, that wouldn't be a suggestion to those people, They would have 10 do N-eorred7 Me. Carson That's correct Commissioner Powell It would have the fora of law? Ms Canon. It would: yes. air. Commissioner Powell. Okay. Page two, June 10 Planning and Zoning Commission Update-do I read that correctly-Ihot we're not going to vote on anything at that time? f Ms Carson, Correct. Actually, there is nnl a Planning end Zoning Commission meeting scheduled Iv June 10. i Thai was imi laly put Into the schedule, but we have loomed that that well be am off night, Based on the current 11me schedule, we would not come back to the Commission after their recommendation this evening sxcpl to provide them with details on what 14 Council oduely his done In these three meetings between now and your next public meeunp Commissioner Powell, Thank you Page nine, I'm not-and 1 know I probably always ask this same queslion-but why do we continue to change the sign ordinanc? We have got what everybody thought was a parted sign ordinance, and now we are doing N again. 'As. Carson Vled, this is a recommendation to sduaoy go back to provision, that were orlglnalty adopted In the r ordinance regarding the measurement of height to consider the maximum height of the elpn to adusAy be height of the sign that Is listed In the ordinance itself-measured Irom pray or surface road, ` Commissioner Powers. Except that we oil also establishing a sign district here. 0 • Ms Carson That's @ provision that Is currentlyin the ordinance AA of the provisions la that are in the ordinance k a now The difference Is that N is optional under the current ordinance, and we're recommending that those Wl provisions be required N. In this particular instance, the property is M a corridor, is In the designated area, and has frontage more Ihan 300-feet. So, A Is taking an exieting provision and simply-sduaky requiring, Instead of making A an optional requirement i i 91 r., ry ) s7 tJ 3'~ X Io L111 MI&M~~mqkmqLILMA~~~ ~ 4. edua~ I , nn o-'~.r.. « .«....a.. w...nw. ..y„~atrm o-rv .av.. ~ v Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes May 27, 1ggIS Page 6 of 7 X Commissioner Powell. gut an optoial provision is something that you could do or rat do. This win hove the fora of law? r Ms. Carson; Vu; l icely what l's Bang "'t not akering the ordinance; k's mere:y roquirkrg that for liras area they show how the sign-tlmita( to what .4. Irwin was prwosing-1a how those signs are gong to Interact for an entire property that fronts along one of these ou. tors, instead of having it done more in a piscemeM manner. Commissioner Powell: Thank you vary much. Any ott,w questions, comments here? I would suppose l's time for a motion. I didnl see a suggested motion two. Ms. Carton: It is a public hearing. I am not tuft M fhe,e Is anyone in the audience that would like to speak on this. Commissoner Powell: Oh, rue; I am sorry; I apola;aa. I didn't cal a public hearing We wN open a public hearing. Wald heard from staff. We'll ask K then is anyone In the audlance that would like to speak for the Issue? Anyom In the audience that would like to speak for? PA" in the eudlence that would kke to speak a lainst, Anyone in the audsnce that would like to speak against? Ms. Canon, do you have anything a" on this Issue? Ms. Carson: Just that the sctuoly sugges ad motion is at IN bottom of palls one, which says to recommend ~ approval of the Harlot ordinance as present id. Commissioner Powell: Thank you. h was rk ht down there and missed A. Thank you wry much, If there h no one "asking for and no one speaking against and staff has closed and there are no other ques9one or statements, I soil clod the public hearing end now ask for a motion. Thank you very, much for telling me. 1 did not catch that It was a public hearing, Ms. Apple: Mr. Chakmtn, I will recommend app,•rval of the Interim Corridor Ordinance. Commissioner PowoC Is there a second? Mr. Moreno: Seoond. Commissioner Powell: We hove a motion and a w"id to recommend approval of the Inter" Corridor Ordlnsnce Any other questions here before wr voh4 Mr Engelbreohl: 1 guest my only, queo Wn of staff Is,-4 )usl want to make tuft 1 understand that Nal Interim CorrkW Winance would Include Highway 390 from Ruddel asst to loop 299 and Highway 390 from PrimtoA west to I•SSE? Ms Carson: That's Inckbed in our rtoommendation. Mr. Engolbrechl: Thank you. Commissioner Powell: N there are no other quesfbnaloommaMS, I'1 eel for a vote. Votes have all been oast. The ` r score is four in favor and one against, (1- 1 with Commissioner Powellcettkq the nay vote) ~ it ~ 11 • mown= o . r«aarns AGENDA INFOMIATION SHEET e AGENDA DAT E: dune 9, 1998 AW* N0. x'022 E PP* DEPARTIN£NTs Planning&Development 01MCDIlA01: Rkk SvehlatTtv? ' Receive aarreport, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding public comments received during Alternative Development Scenarios public meetings. IIACKGR On April 28O'",U*U1998, City Council viewed a presentation of the Alternative Development Scenarios. Issues of interest included growth ~attcros, population density, land use demand, and development timing. Representatives of 110K, a Dallas planning cod design firm, umeiled four "Alternative Development Scenarios" - (1) CORRIDORS, (2) URBAN CENT ERS, (3) NEIGHBOR3100D CENTERS, and (4) COMPACT GROWTH. The scenarios were explained in detail by the consultants describing potential growth management options commonly employed throughout the United Statcs. Copies of the Altemative Scenarios with implications, impacts and policies for each are included as EXHIBIT 01. I pl'BLIC AIEEI'INGS AND PRESENTATIONS Upon examination and approval of release by Council members, staff prepared a schedule of public meetings to allow members of the community to review the Alternative Development Scenarios, where they could state their preferences and any criticisms they may Nava Staff has used the following means to communicate these meetings to the public: PeOton Record-Chrapicle advertisement and story coverage, inserts and notices in utility bills (33.100), Myers to every clumentary school child distributed through the school district (13,000), flyers at all major public facilities (500). Cable channel 25 notification of meetings and video presentation showings, aird city cable channel 26 meeting schedule The sc hcdul a of publ i c meetings included: Slay 7i° Sam Itouston Elemcntary Meeting Completed 20 Attendees stay 14" Wilson Elementary Meeting Completed 3 Attendee slay 20" Ra)zor Elementary Steering Completed 8 Attendees May 21" Rivers Eltmentary Sleeting Completed 0 Attendee slay 29'" Bomrun Elementary Meeting Completed 35 Attendees Junc 4" Council Work Room Meeting Completed 47 Attendee Ma) 10 Park ttosrd McetingCompleted Board siceting Slap 29's ('hanibcr of Commerce Meeting Completed 22 Attendees June 1" Public Utilities Board Steeting Completed Board Meeting Sui s cy sheets acre presented along with the scenarios handout for the community' to fill out and return to staff. Staff used a 25 minute video of the 110K team presenting the scenarios at each merging. After each video presentation, staff rclicrated the conceptual nature of the growth management options and tun took oral comments, which staff has reported • to the City Council on a weekly basis. Meeting updates are included as L\IiIBIT 02. A total of I SO people attended the presentation mcctings, excluding board meetings. Staff will present drat, analysis of this data and the survey later in this reprn t, 1 11'F,1' & COJ S siNCUSIONS prcllminary Surrey Results '[be sunny staff prepared to analyze the scenarios was based on the implications and Impacts of each scenario. • Koch scenario assumed full population projections for growth at 225,000 people In 2020, We asked that each • • scenario be rated independently from the other based on the direction for growth that Denton should follow, i Choices ranged from strongly agree to strongly disagree with each particular scenario statement. The sun'eys were then riled based on the percentage of people answering that question based on each of the S possible C xlclq 11fCUbfP PIAN'A1ttk"Sroronnr AlSfiC85 dot Page I of to 3 2 X I❑ "Y a 0 ...rte. • 0 I , opinions. There are overlaps within each plan where agreement or disagreement was prevalent, regardless of the scenario option. The data is what staff has received up to June Sw and includes 21 surveys. Subsequent data will be entered and the results updated as more surveys are received. The following reviews the survey results thus far, CORRIDCQS ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO Strongly Agree Neutral Massive Strongly For each of the folowing, Indicate H this Hthls to the for growth that Denton should fallow, + re ss' 14% 1014 14% INS 71% 7h intensity qM ri in a pattern of an e t ots m4ur oroul axe and h ly wry s. -0 0ni 10% 43'4 109k 34% Growth occurs primarily on scant land wish Ii mi tad to in vestmem, seder clop ment and In All ac Iir ity. 145 19% $1% 24'4 Orvell a,low.dcnsily land u8paticm wilh highest densities along eanldors,second hilliest within the f rreew ay loop and lower drniiry outside the loop. IIII tl 3"L Y5 1914 14% $11% Dnclop mrnl may rullow s sprawl or kaphog psaem vi 14w; 24% 31% 14% Srerelaiion of land uses with some mlved use Dow nwo n, and more rariesy or resldenhal typo 0^^s I9°5 37ti 24% 2414 Po mble a dl ac ency Iis it s wflh elnjte family and non redden 0 al der rlopme nl. 0^'. 141: 19"4 19^4 31% Most nrw der elupmenucliriry It outalde or Duo nw% m, minimd Ter"itment In Dowr.'nw n, if. Downtown is much smsller In this Moreno S't5 10°; 24% 10.1. 51% Greater land site consumed under thiucenario', leis aSricullunl lsnd it preserved ST. 1015 19'4 19¢5 41% rommercid elrip drvdnpment may occur. 19 33% 144 19% Thoroughfares would probably foltow 6Sridoed meet pattern Neighborhood etreela would probably , - ° follow a curvilinear and cul-de-sac pattern J". 10 lu. S' 41% Lower dcnuro and des dupmrn! patterns teaks mm transit sus feasible and more avpemia e t a 0^, I41 " 24°4 015 6214 Mare miles of hi lbw tyI and meets req mired More vehicle miles era tr4te'ed and ueuge trip let phi _ are lunar. . 19^. 29°5 19% The grim a.on or Loop 211 would prubab ly be n ceded by 2020 43% -11"; _U', 0^, 10115 Natural ay rat ms would be parse nod fur it romsle 73.5- 24". It, 19^Y i0"5 Linter parka and enrirunmennl open space wish trails COUId be ahbliahed In the flood plain areas ' p I P. 3114 20- !i'. 10^5 No Lrpe rcyor it park but Com mumty and nelghbnhood parks In open apace items connected w the AL line a park system. n^. 33; 14^. 0". 24% Ahand,,ned radruod nghl-of.wty could be used fur hike and bike trails 10 ten pu lu an -1 ar iote wll pro a y e required to nnlcr the tiger pagrap Ie area owner W4 ° K WIN those prwl3ed should be amdler{n K'de t -0 r!". 1rP'. 19. 19". 71% Mme wtlerA moor 4alenrom will be rrgahed wllh t higher cost due to kapnng dn'elopmenl and low ' •p' _ dcnally growth I , • u. 0'. 10"^- ~ 14^, 74^a 43% the cost to pros iJr pubhetenkteis probably higher due to more diapered pattern of growth. er^a ul . Jt U'v tv 32% May be more dJncult to hoe ade9wle teipanse tlmea for public trig ly. f r.3 l1' Wit Ski 33% 1J Greaser d~tlann between urfuola Localioms should be encouraged in open apace eortldur uui 1 C' kit 141 Ill Oki pKAN 'AliN,SretsnosAISLT6A 1m page 2 of lQ I 1 i i . _,~__r. 10 10 32 X e,__ a Q ' } r • 4. URBAN CENTERS ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO snanely Agree Neutral Dtaagne etrangy For each or the loltowlng. Indicate Mist Is she direetlon I growth that Denton should follow. Agree Disagree t :114% 31% 24% 19% s% ~t ird Otavith octave around defined growth ecnkn within the Clry • Downtown Cenur, Commercial Centers end AlrponOndm:rid Can let 14% 24% 105. 14% 19% e Urban comic "are located e1 the inr•nections Of major IhorougM1farea. b R 14% 31% 29% 14% Sv: A M1!ih Intenmihy end drm~ty ofuta al oe UrDen Cenkre k 19% 24% 24% 29% 1 . Limltrd rcinvenmenl and rcdevelo; rtknl of Do wnlownIn at is blMis Compact Growth or Neiphlwrhood Collins) . I r• M% 11% I9% 24% S% Lend vat w ithln rye Urban Cause limited, Commercial Urban Ce^kn have a mix of offrcR commercial and high density reudenlial n 197k 41% 10% 14% 10% AIrpon Urban Corer hie Ind ustrlat w his su pporsing office and commercial areal. 14% 10"4 19% 31% 19% Oretn Deh4l lntltullunal woes and higher density raidentitl watt should be rncounied along the freeways. 10x4 31% 19% 19'4 S% Raid entiai Oro wth.urrou ands urbro ceatrn with a decreae In do ndty a dntenn fro m the a rban ten car mcrrueC More variely of residential Ty pre " 191a 311% 29% 1Oki S% Community elated commercial dev a lnpmy In mi ght"runt some secondary nodes. s 19% 33% 24 , 10% 3% Major thoroughfare system would probably follow a gridded creel pollen. r 1 31% 14% Minimal seca"ary Iboroughfarr netwurk. s 24% IJ% 10'4 34% 29% Mare raldrntial erects would lint dlit s 11y to major th oloulhfs a. 21°. IN 14% 24-6 S% Density al Urban Centers make$ Masi basil mole feaibie H 29, 33% 191. 514 M% The e%lin non of Leap gel would probably M needed by 1020 17% J7% Sn'. Sn4 S% Natural ry lens wou1J be preened forilia it tot ' 19^. 4376 01b 24% 5% Lln ear parts end ens it on mental opti space wish Irai is could De alobts hed in the rood plain eras to u1. pros ids for plniH regbnd pert need. 11 . 7E $tr S'k 19% ~ Abandoned nilnnJ righrof•w q could be used far hike and Dlke Inih. w y 14^: 111 to^. IJ": 514 Pubbc open or act area co old be iisldad within each urban trnkr, d W. SPY I9^6 10^1 314 Regional rrereatinn opporwei6a could be pralded in linear park sysem to Irovlde for sd'lae regional park needs w s 1144 I9".s 24% 10t: Mon pee Lee and fee hnlitlu will probably be needed tampered to Compsot Scrnelo, hnwssrr should be Ins than Corridor Scenario due to same dcisoky toncen trtl lone at Urban Corlett. Ill . !"4 29^,4 290; 9t 6 19°. Meer miles of itrecn am it 61;1111 is lh an Comp oil Scene rho, bow rv el thou l d be Its s than Corridor Sccn aria ! 70% 29% to^. 19",: Th e c oat to pros ldr pub is eel ices should be tower then Corridor Sc marl o basic vet n of slow a Compact Scenario s Iv'. 71",Y II% 21% 19% .1 s ' Shnuld be Geier m base adeqmu response limes An publle it rely to long a Infrc eongeetlon Is as aided I s l0^. U4 -Una -'!v^4J -S% Less distance between schools Ihan Corridor Scrnulo', loilllaea should be encoun led in open space n tortidar ilea C 'S1( 131' .11f ('OMP PLAMAIIN,SUnarim AlSCC CIP doc Page 3 of 10 s l 10 32 10 mow t NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO I strongly Agree Mi Daagra. strong y For each of the lollowin, indicate ff this Is IM dirodon For prv4 the! Denton should Follow, A see In ZZ rr 33% 33% 24% 0% A low it Intensity rod density or use at Neighborhood Conltn compered to Urban Centers , 't 797. 1155 21% 0% NoShborhood Cc rising are not loci at the In tersections ofmajor thorrughferes e w ]S% 29% 1 19% 0% Incredi dcosity and Intensity m the Downtown. k 013% 33% 19% 14% 0% Residential gruwthocii around neighborhood centers. Residential development within walking distance t I (usually V^ to % mile) of nellhborhoaJ center. 13% 33% 19% 0% 14% Major cemmcrahl nodes and industrial districts exist. C ~a 10'4 29% 29% 29% S% Separation till uta ii within Neighborhood Center and Dow nlowll. 1 5 .t 19% 24% 24% 23% 10% Vertical mited•use dc.dop rdi ~.'ho the Neighboehood Center. " 19^. 33% 24% 71% 1 Reinrestmenl and rede.elopu ant may occur Downtown to 4ncreau the intensity and dim icy crusts Dot mown rafter than Corti sor or Lhban Center Scenarios, 33°u 19% 1334 0% Clmiled use of large lot residential, " 10". !2% 1971 10% 1015 Other nan-residcntial districts would occommod+te Industrial and mare nltonaleommerclal ocli% tots a 19". 43% 29% 11 0% Majm thorn ughfare system would prob ably follow 1 pidded street began. •s 24". 311% S!% 3% (J75 N eighborhood tire, uystem ern be griddle d or eorvllincar. "51"S 31% [In. 1111 Grater hierarchy to 0inrpurl+Lion ii a grtarer secondary network, Secondary meat a) gem mnaea to - J No i gh borhood Centers, how ere r flow is on pedestrian access 31% 14% 10% 075 oppurlum4a for i transit, .i 29". 33% 2911, 0ei 10'. thr arm lion of I.cop 291 would probably be needed by 2020. a 4371 !t"5 14". 1 Dediared bike lance and bike traits could be established ¢($(a a 41"t 24'. 24'. S% 071 N+lural gstemt would be pretii for drainge , 'a1 w 29;5 79% 191. 24% d% l.lnat par" and enrirunmentd open apart with Ii could be esnblhhed In the flood plain arc as to mYl provide for pan ivt regional perk need, a " 311% 19". 571 14% Abandoned railroad right-0f sy could be used for hike and bike trolls. n , 2u e3% I9•1'1 0"1 3% Neighborhood parks looted within centers. Regional recreation opportunllie could be pruaided in liner 1 Park ow.re to provide for scuts re tonal ark needs. % C-0 BE I4^. $29t 24 t0t 0"t More pobcs and era facilities will probably be compared to Urban heten Scenrrlst; however those 1 provided will probably be smalier In uNe It should be asim to have rdequrle responal times for pubbe ssrety 4 tl•1 6214. 24% 0'.v 0.5 leas mils ofatreeu and utililin should be needed than under Urban Centers Scenario LLY 1011 32% 24"5 11% 0% the cost to provide public Ili may be h4lirr than Compact Socialist but should be less than Cori - Scenario ^!9 q% 1071 107t 0^t Schools should be louled within Nil hborhood Centers with a focus on pedestrlro access. public risen S apace and echoot flat truund treat m6thl be combined wlthln the Neighborhood Center. i 0 . 1' Mc'nGTHiiMANAhikrScenarlMAISCCe-9dw Pap 4 of 10 N.t { u COMPACT GROWTH ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO saamtly Aper Noncral D npn Sari For each of the 1d1o971ng,1ndirala I thls Is the dlrnh; ion for prow h that Denson should follow, A mr 'a n 33% 0% 31% 19% 10% Development Is within a defined arts determined by an urban l:o%tb boundary , 5 n29% 24% M 10% lo-'s Maj or ityofdevelopmenloc curt%ilhln ekletinS urban area throw=h n:nvisLe t, redevelopmcnt and innl) rr devtlopr ert. 'a 19% t9% 211 2191, 1"1. rncrii in in tent i ty and denI ry cf built envIt"n nt• Sri steel in Downtown, High avtrsat densi l ice w i thin the gro rrh boon dory. Densi ty deers it inp dn1rdy as di its nce from Down town inrreascs. woossissis 1011, 19% 19% 33% 19%s Mixed land use wi thin the e n lire grow th boundary . II°4 33% 23% 10% 10% Di strict,' vi th. Srowlh boundary hate primary land use but would also allow sit pporlini uRt j w 19% 2li 14% 191: 10% Mued land me wool J be hi l hear In the l' Mow%~ with lgnaier InteSation o r uses both v crl,c al ly and hon2umally 19^a 29% 2931 19% 314 Net ni It mere and rede vtloporenl may occur Downtown to Increase the It Iii and density Alt its Du wntowt 1, much larger loan nth ar ice r ior. 10^. 73'4 24% 22% to". Uor, led uIt or tsr st lit l Nil den lid . 23% 31% 19% to% 10% Alriculturcl land would likely be preen rd in the area outside of the growth boundary. ° 2a°: 29°a 23% 111 Tkr thomughfsre a) firm (iaeludmS neighborhood streets) would probably rollow agnddcd street pa;tern to allow rot more rflicient use of la rd. " 141. 19%s 33% 24% 10% Loop 0eew mys aurroun dml Downtown may require higher apse i ty to rent the ms. .r Ir 19% 1 drew 10°a IO%1, blare transit 11 mlet rr aible dut to hi gEer den, it lea amd may likely be rcqul and to meet the blnsrI all stn in reds o r the more dens urban a my i ronmen t _74^:- 19% 19^i 3'4 S%s rcw er mils offreew ay and roads would be rcq uved to eu ppun gro w th. irowev er, with in the Sru.2. Alto more ro paci ly wou ld be required on the rood sy items to supporl It S2rer den Illy dear ctopment and id congestion. H 10^1 29 u a3% 101". 10'. The nka s ion of Loop 291 weit or 147 may not be would probably be needed be fare In 2n 29^° 33% 71^. I011, 7"1, D;drcstad bArlancvandbike lnibcould brestablished. I to 14 „ 29" 33% 1W. ! The I¢ke to the sal and the dnin+gl Daim to the weer make a ndural envies, mental boundary to limp 84 Falursl ayaremr would be preened fur drainye. ' 2v^. 29°k 19 19^'. 7sa Ne ghborhoud bard open ipi should be dopened Ihroughoul the City fbllowlng the grid palitm r 'In w 0 20 , 39 Ali I0 24 7ni Lmar park, and errvlroenri open spas with trills could be established in the flood pion Alas fur puultt park need, A isrgr nlii.rid park+dim:iI the linarpark system could be atabinhcd forictiae pork needs • „ 21 293 241. 3". 19hs Abandoned ralro,d right-0f way cc uld be used fog hikend bike bull. rower polite and AN facilities would probably be required b service the smaller aeoenphie $No however, that pmvlded may need to be Inge,, Should be easier W We sdequere relpome times for E pub lit ldely I long as craft; senses Don Is IvelJed, 10^° 3111, 29^. 19% S"4 NenrictinS growth to umdlrr SenpapAle area will result in frwar wafer and sewer ertetDiom ' f'1 241. 31;3 II^. 3'.a l he cunt to prow we p ubhc ie n ice s it low e r at higher di iRI(u rill doici it bees me it ry high 1. ~ Q ~ ~ 19^ 10^: !7 l0",1, S Schnnl Lktllom would follow ,ties rVdded atria ahem. i I I C ,lit Ill. I It (131,111i p1, AN MN,Sccnari os AISdt 69 dot ty880 S 0 ~ I ~ ;.'~a. 2h K 32XIO w. • ~ ,a~o+aaa 0 - I We can come to some conclu ions with the preliminary survey results collected up to June Sr,'. However, these conclusions may change as we receive more surveys. Overlap within 1he f scenarios I According to the answers given in the surveys, several of the impact and implications from the four scenarios received similar responses. Within the Environmental, Parks & Recreation section of all four scenarios, responses strongly agree , with the premrvation of natural areas, the use of floodplains as linear parks and trails, and the continued maintenance and improvement of the parks system of the City of Denton. Responses to the survey showed that land usns and traffic j patterns that create strain on the existing transportation system should be discouraged. Mixed development should occur, and some nodes of commercial and industrial districts should continue to exist apart from single-family land uses. Downtown Denton should remain a focus of economic importance to the City, Reinvestment and increased density should I be encouraged within the Downtown. Three transportation related implications received similar responses. Alternatives in transportation to the single occupant vehicle (car) should be encouraged through increased use of bicycling and public transportation. Three of the four scenarins encouraged the construction of the western section of Loop 288, while the Compact Growth stated it wasn't needed. The three similar loop construction implications received positive responses, while the non-build option in the Compact Growth Scenario received a neutral majority. All three scenarios (Urban Centers, Neighborhood Centers, and C'cmnact Growth) which listed major thoroughfares to be built in a gridded paaem received positive responses, the Corridors 5stnario listing the addition of neighborhood streets following a curvilinear or cul-de-sac panem received a more negat ve I rsponsc Gridded street patterns allow for more options of route choice by drivers thereby reducing the load on major anoints and intersections by diffusing traffic over a greater area In addition, narrower, straight roads increase pedestrianism. Striking DiJjerences one of th, more unusual mucomes of the survey is the amount of public funding for services that citizens might be willing to pay for the implementation of managed growth. The highest amount of public cost for services listed as an impact of growth under the Corridors Scenario received strong negative responses. However, increased amount of services (fire, police) and several positive responses to increased constnuction of roadways show that many of the respondents realized the need for increased spending by the City to provide adequala services for a growing city. Some individuals during public meetings stated that they would be willing to pay higher taxes to manage growth, but more specifically as a no growth policy. Af,yolii) of Opinion Most of the question: w hich received it majority of "strongly agree' or "agree" responses were within the Neighborhood C niters Scenario, with Compact Growth Scenario having the next highest number, Excluding Environmental, Parks & recreation catcgory which received strong agreement across all scenarios, respondents expressed positive opinions for the 1 development patterns end densities that both the Neighborhood and Compact Growth Scenarios would bring. During one meeting, a citizen staled that the Neighborhood Centers Scenario, while controversial, would have the greatest positive impact on the perceived problems of traffic and land use compatibility, While not receiving a majority of "strongly agree,, responses many of the land use issues within the Urban Centers Scenario including a separs,ed industrial center around the airport and the continued development of a strong commercial area did receive uany poaitise responses, however ` contrary results on creating more energy in the downtown as o mixed use commercial node were high Use of this element in combination w ith the land use implications of the Neighborhood Scenarios could be incorporated to provide a central dense commercial area with adequate arterials servicing it. Design standards could be implemented which promote walking between different commercial developments within the center, Strip development and continued sprawl received the majority of strong negative responses. Q ' c set nr rte cONIP PLAVAll UkrScenarlm AIq CC 6 9 d v Page G of 10 a.M r w Public Comments Staff has sent weekly update reports from all the presentatior, meetings to the Council members. The meeting updates are attached as EXHIBIT 03. Again there are some comments that overl,q with regularity and some that do not. The following outlines the major comments that have been consistent thrvughout the public presentation process: Growth should be planned and doesn'tjust happen; take a proactive approach not a laissez-faire one Transit issues, including light rail and regional commuter aystems should be planned for Neighborhoods orientation should be it slroag factor Clean business and industry Development should pay for itself Synergy should remain focused in Downtown and the Universities Worry ovt r the deterioration and I sss of business in dowmtowri Balanced _rowth and Timed Growth Other C1rn vi. Control Options Slowing down growth Use of Tit, Abatement Policies should be very specific Concern of er higher densities and equal concern over spawl C'omprchcnsive Plan enforcement as related to zoning Market Driven Plans - Developer driven plan Policy Driven Plam Citizen driven plans Infrastructure capacities and costs to provide more Transportation as the largest issl Provi ions for City services in outlying areas, costs to the community School planning pdotities Implications of the costs by the plan ohs ices Quality of Life Varieties of housing at different costs, affordability Some willing and some not willing to reduce the use of automobiles Lnvironmem.t issues including air, water, contaminants and pollution ('dies visibility and growth quality Limitations on the types and quantity orindustriai growth Development of more streets allowing a variety of route options Maintain City fdcntity, not be another suburb or bedroom city to Dallas-Ft. Worth or Lewisville Du not want sprawl, however a few citizens maintained they would be willing to pay for no growth and large lots, even if it means sprawl and higher taxation Want walkabdity, bikabllity and alternative transit options No direct access along limited access highways sastainability of the city on all levels Park and open space planning, including maintaining 100 year flood plains out of development areas Prucide good job opportunities; partnerships with the universities to provide programs forjob needs Ilse architectural regulations and performance standards ^ fstabllsh a green builder program Prw ide a visual theme for the City of Denton Concerns expressed over our natural resources, presen ing and conserving them, protecting them as well ltesoruce availability as a timing mechanism for growth I Impacts on our watersheds and drainage systems r Pith firP.crriclpatinrr at the presentations of the Alternative Development Scenarios was low. Stafbelleves there was not ' ennayh rorrunentary crud that to was not sl f dent to result Ina comntuniry consensus on the growah management of the C'crr, Mmi n rr. hared on what rommcnrarp and letters we rereived, staff has attempted io draw conclusloar bared on that b forornction ~S 1'Altr; i'1111'OMI'l'L!xNAIdk~3cenuN,n NYCC aad.K Pagel of 10 x ICl 02x10 M' r O I I Some comments and letters refer to the rate of growth and rssumptions for full population made in developing these scenarios. In this case, they stared this as unacceptable. The assumptions are that the population projections in 2020 will be 225,000 people and none of them assumes growth controls for a lower rate of growth or population controls. The plan for growth at that population rate could change to the year 2070, 2040 or even 2050, if Council were to set policies to control the timing, placement and rate of growth, A strong contingent of citizens are attracted to this modified option of I the Compact Growth scenario. Fur staff to address policies available to the City for implementation of this type of growth management, staff will require time to prepare more in-depth research. Regardless of futur: direction by the Council regarding the rate of growth, Ac will still need to look at the relative placement of uses. The Corridors scenario was overwhelmingly thought lobe a "negative" plan for growth A majority of the participants were partial to the Neighborhood Centers scenaria and the concepts supporting this type of plan. They were also in favor of strengthening the downtown as it strong and viable force for the community as a business and cultural resource. That the downtown should encourage redeveiopmeat in some areas and strengthen it tics to the community and other eistricts as well as the universities, There was acceptance that the city has already developed in some areas as Corridors and as Urban Centers. There was some indicat'on that urban centers on a limited basis might be t good way to deal with industrial uses, connectivity and expansion of the downtown as it vibrant and strong center beyond the square itself, that limited urban centers on a smaller scale at major intersections would be acceptable. However, strong indications about transportation and roadways issues led into the problems that were occurring in specific areas that have encouraged this Iype of growth pattern. Slany people liked the idea of more roads, more often, interconnected, allowing more mobility and alternate options for travel routes. This concept for transportation is most apparent in the Neighborhood Centers end Compact Growth scenarios. East Aest and north-south through connections In the City are a major issue, people believe these through connections could alleviate much of the tra-portation problems internally to the City. Use of some aspects of the Compact Growth scenario found some favoritism when issues such as neighborhood distinctions, less use of the automobile, vralkabilsty, biking, transit viability and light rail were discussed, as well as growth control options. The scenario allows the City to use funds in a mor, economical way that bring up the quality of life for everyone, notJust some of the city. The linking of parks and natur l resource preservation, including prohibiting development within of the 100 year aloodplain is an issue that win overwbrlming majorities of approval, protection of our natural resources and maintaining the quality of those resources is also a large factor in the comments, Affordability was a issue that negated the Corridors scenario as an option (let the market have its way) and somewhat the Urban Centers scenario because they dissipate commun'ties, resources, have high financial impacts and tend to cause sprawL These two scenarios also took enemy from the downtown, one of the issues everyone agreed on as being important, Pat'ks and orcn space, as w cII as biking Acre consistent issues. Sidewalks and pathways through connected parks also brought a lot of support Using these assets of open space, drat age corridors and cultural aspects of the city could mean a way to bring stronger in^ritity to the city as a whoic• '>-1_.ly were concerned about growth impacts on an environmental level as Atli as deterrents to their quality of life. tinmc apressed their concern over rn•nprehensiae plan enforcement. Asked how we can use the document more crrcctivcly as a guide to zoning and land use issues. Asked if the City could require enforcement of the policies and cnmprchcnsive plan by requiring toning petitioners to mat a formal proposals to amend the comprehensive plan if they w aid to do something other than what it indicates are uses allowed. They believe this should be done prior to tone R changes. Many exrressed concern over currently zoned aid undeveloped lands, Asked if the City could initiate re zonings of these properties to possible neuttal uses until ,uch time as a proposal comes forward with specific plans and cvcn a timetable fur development, there A as major concern over what the plans meant by industry, to the level that people wanted the word and uses defined at this point Majorities of the people oho spokr- regarding industrial uses want clean business and industry. lluy appear to want the city to be very precise about how they use tai abatements, if at all, and whom they are extended to. Slany v, ant industrial to be restricted to specific arts and the uses within Industrial to be limited to clean ones. No unc oprcared to want heavy industrial use. Many wanl,-d performance standards to be much tougher than our current zoning ordinance indicates There was a strong continlient thatbclieves development should pay for itself. That the city should not extend infrastructure on the taxpayers dime They all appear to want levels of sustainability for the city E.; finances and the environment of the city is a whole ►1► c Ni( nr nrromp rrAVAIIN~Sc, as"rxlstr-a-cd,x Post 8 of 10 h rte - ~ ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT Current Schedule ~ City Council Update Alternative Scenarios June 9" P&Z Work Session Update Alternative Scenarios June 24" P&Z Work Session Preferred Scenario July 22nd i City Council Work Session Final Report Population Forecasting July 18" PUB Presentation Preferred Scenario August 3" , P&Z Public Hearing Recornmendation Preferred Scenario August 12" ~I City Council Work Session Preferred Scenario August 25" City Council Pubic Hearing. Adoption Preferred Scenario September 15" City Council Public Hearing If Necessary Preferred Scenario October 0 ! Rev lew Process Dependent on Council instruction and action regarding the direction of the P.Itemative Development Scenarios, staff has prepared two options to possible action by rcuncil. do Proceed with the plan process as we have contracted with RUST/HOK under the current scope of work. Staff and HOK would be using limited public comments and existing land uses to identify patterns consistent with the adopted Denton Plan Policies and those comments and suncye we have received. Staff is proposing to audit the Council members duri^3 the recess period in individual sessions to discuss growth management issues leading to a preferred scenario. Ootion 2 Extend the schedule and provide more public meetings, with more advertisement and gamer more citizen input and ccnscnsuc into the plan. Following the Council recess near the end of July, staff proposes to offer the Council a planning charette to discuss issues and concerns and work with the consultants, RUST/HOK on ideas for growth management planning and reach conciv, r-ii. This charette will enable the consultants, Council and staff to move forward together io.vard citizen consensus and concluecns toward a preferred scenario. Changes to work being performed in either case will cause a change in scope of work for our consultants, RUSTVOK. Staff has prepared a schedule for Council's review should they conclude they would like to proceed wr'.:'his option. i Alternate Schedule City CosaiciI Update Alternative Scenarios June 9" V&Z Work Session Update Alternative Scenarios June 24' City Council change Conclusions July 24" or 33" ~ City Council Work Session Final Report Population Forecasting July 18" P&Z W'erk Session Preferred Scenario Septembc: 9" " PUB Presentation PreferredSceoarict September 21 P&Z Public Hcarin2 Recommendation Preferred Scenario September 23" Citv Council Work Session Preferted Scenario October 13" ('ityCouncdrublicHeir, Ing Adoption Preferred Scenario October 20 City Council PuNicHearing If Necessary Preferred Scenario November 3" PRIOR AC'TIUNlR£aEW' the City Council instructed staff to develop a schedule to integrate The Denton Plan wPh the implementation of development impact fees. The Npartment of Planning and Development and the Department of WaterMaslew'alerhave been working since Novemtxrof 1997 to prepare Requests for Proposals, review consultant proposals, and select consultant teams to coordinate all necessary activities. Two firms, RUST Environment& Infrastructure (RUST), and Nclimuth, Obata I Kassabaum. Inc (HOK), were selected as the consultant team for the project. The RUSTTIOK • contract for this project was approved by City Couricil on February 17'", 1995. 0 • Inc scupe of services for forecasting and land use planning consultant services is intended to assist community de-;isiurr making with respect to future growth by accomplishing the following tasks. 1. Determine the City's build-oul capacity. c +t( [it I) ROMP Pt ANA11Dn 5retu drier A15{C a-a aue Page 9 o f 10 i , 2s 32 ~ s Iry R}y ,3I l• C I t ' r 11 F 1 ,i-'• I ~t j I J 0 E f 2. Forecast population growth, 3. Forecast land use demand for different dei,sity patterns. 4. Prepare alternative development saenar as. 5. Allow time for public review and comment on scenarios. 6. Prepare 'he preferred development v,enario for comoreheasive plan guidance. FISCAL, INFORMATION. The consultant scope of work for the forecasting (RUST) and the alu•mative development scenarios work 010K) contains fees for services not to exceed 5224,642. Project funding will be fimiehed by the General Fund, through reimbursement of the Utility Fund. EXHIBITS Exhibit #I Alternative Development Scenarios Booklet Exhibit #2 Written Pa'alic Comments Exhibit #3 Public Meeting Updates 'i Respectf ly Submitted ' ( 1 ~ r Y { uz Mark Donaldson, Assistant Director for David M. Hill, Director Planning and Development Prepared by: I Nan,, K. McBeth Comi •ehenske Planning Manager Y • I (y I I~ i I I I "I C MCBBtrIbMT PLAN`AIOe Srmnior AJS1CC 669.6oe Page 10 of IO t) ' • tI I z~ IM1. Ie - .:e, 25:~ ~Ca 32x~d iL l r , . _ j Denton The i Alternative Develo meet Scenarios CONCEPTS & ANALYSIS FOR: ^7RRIDORS SCENARIO'' . RBAN CENTERS SCENARIO NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS SCENARIO COMPACT GRGWTH SCENARIO ' - 1 9 OPINION SURVEY j • April 1998 ° • ' i RUSTMOK CITY OF DENTON EXHIBIT 1 I 10 . 10 e 0 ternative eve opment enarios Introduction In order to understand the Implications of different growth patterns, the City has used consultants to provide us with options. The options are "conceptual" in nature and do not imply specific land uses or specific transportation solutions. The options presented in this booklet are an attempt to use current information about the City's physical form, current growth patterns, and population forecast indicators to formulate methods of growth. The options range from loose controls to tight controls on growth and the City's ability to sustain that growth. The question we need to answer is: what are the Impacts to Denton under these types of typical growth patterns? The flow chart below illustrates the process the City is taking to create the Denton Plan. The Denton Plan Policies have been adopted. Currently we are ' conceptually analyzing the city as a whole. This all leads to the resulting "Comprehensive Plan" of the Denton Plan for the city. The Denton Plan is scheduled for completion in the fall of 1999. Public comment and input are Integral for completion of each stage. The Comprehensive Plan Process I %hL. N . , Preferred Development Scenario Completion fall 1998 t • The "Overall" Denton Plan • • or Comprehensive Plan for the City Completion Fall 1999 •2- i k r C.] 32 x I ❑ Mqu 1 0 , I i t101NA l temative Development 5ce"arlos Assumptions The Alternative Development Scenarios presen!ed herein are Intended to provide a glimpse of the manner in which development could occur In Denton within a twenty-year horizon. The four hypothetical scenarios, the Corridor Scenario, the Urban Centers Scenario, the Neighborhood Centers Scenario and the Compact Growth Scenario, Identify the physical form, the potential Implications related to development patterns, land use, transportation, environmental and urban design, as well as the potential City policies that should be considered In order to determine a Preferred Development Scenario for the City of Denton. In order to create four distinct hypothetical scenarios that fully document the concepts associated with each development type, some exiting conditions Including land uses have been modified. As the development of a preferred scenario is initiated, the aspects of the alternative scenarios that are viewed favorably by the City Council and the Citizens of Denton will be Incorporated along with exiting land uses in order to create that scenario, Several Bask assumptions have been made in order to provide a baseline For comparing the conceptual scenarios. Again, as additional information Is provided by the City of Denton and RUST regarding a preferred land use mix, preferred residential densities and anticipated future populations, it will be incorporated Into the development or the Preferred Development Scenario. For the basis of comparison, the following assumptions have been made in developing the Alternative Development Scenarios for the Cit, of Denton, • The Planning Horizon Is for the year 2020; • The estimated population In the year 2020 will be 230,000 to 240,000 people; • The Land Use Mix In the year 2020 will be the same as currently exists; The Zoning Mix in the year 2020 may or may not be the same as cur ently exists; • In the Corridor, Urban Centers and Neighborhood Centers Scenarios, over densities will be the same as exist today In Denton; • In the Compact Growth Scenario, the overall density will be 33% higher than exists today In Denton. The following pages present the four Alternative Development Scenarios, their potential Implications, and policies that may be necessary to make each scenario become a rewity In Denton. It Is hoped that these allernativrs will initiate discussion of the issues associated with the future urban form for Denton in order to prepare a preferred scenario that will guide development in Denton over the next twenty years. IDa,DO4 - ci... rr Ducar cniau en ioo,0o0 - hr ss1r • 1.1 1111 e$ Ir lol,u 1 Il t.al , lo0,On0 ■r, qr1 4.u If / 1,111 ( 104,400 V/d 1111 71 1 111 j Ioa,eDe - - - ~ VA1 t,1flJ1 Il 1.1 II,III . 1DO,Daa _ V.tl[r /Ill • • 1.1 111 1 /I•II 11111 1.11 1.1 11111 1 14.1 x11.11 / /1 IAII 1110 loss pool 9446 1110 kill 7191 1 1111•/' 1'rrl 41,11.".001 Il,n 1.11 1411, x111/ 1,,•111 1 A Range of Possible Growth Trends for Denton Land Use and Population , C City Comultent predicts growth at 5 to 71/6%. Potential Population Capacity with Current Zoning. ' .3. i »r,, ~I 2h x 32x.10 LILMWK I I I s i 110 _ _ J 1 THE DENTON PLAN 77 e a o AM Y'i 0.7 ' y f ~I _7 _Rp Y. I U I I I I ~ i If + 4 (mot. 47, 12 ID I t I ~ w fF-'~ .1~ ~ r ~ °I I ~tw l,{ J f f 10, I~~ l I \ _~I C i L__auaie Mug- I _ C ~ ! 17, THE DENTON PLAN Coy of Nwom D E ,v r o r e X,4 s JED Mir ~ _ ,•-,~a~~ ~ ,7 , y1 y 1 I/ yR ~Y" II /l 1 YNt ( 1 ~ ~ \ ~ L , v v ~ ~1ry,"Y' '~Y ~Y ~W 11 4~w 'yV yI L ♦I' v - Mal TILL DEN TON PLAN ~ 9 use~ae+r[ " ' o i I I , II / I ~ 1 t: 1 f~ J Magna I _ T l` 't i spy , /7 Ail f f ' I -J a ~1 ~ ~ ~u ry~'y ~ I C+I az 1 J i' `f ~«_J ( '1 ~'L _ r y .'i~C'ti~ r 111 • 1.'J j ty.. A• i ~ I /`~11 ~ III ~ ~~,i ~ ! TIDE DENTON PLAN D1) EATCIA, FEX4IS ~ ~ 1 3 2 I I Y { I~1 r I , E /i .,per- p r. V I ~ f p I.W f• E I ~ WMy .i. RY 1r r ~ ~ ' 1 • ~ W by . 111 THE DENTON PLAN ANN e 0 c BLUM _ -y f pp~~ io - QA[ a! A Vie, 1Y IIIIII,pr ~ - - - r - ,~>r EI ea I elf I - {rki J i T i xl ass, -Pp - ( r I L-J - - - - o y~ 0 Is " I e • ° 4 ~ Pa i P 0 .lL I 40 THE DENTON PLAN ~r rNP/oevwe DEA'iDA'. TEXAS 1 19'19 ISO , i O C i 1_ - ,1G ~J ~sw i 'i i t l,.n}I J` ~ ? J... S J I - C. -J 1 oil, [ !T a..~ n M J1 •1' r 51 + M < r -.'0" grip, MVIN THE DEATON FLAN lot /0% r 1 MKT tiC... 1 ',.Ll 9",A r d - 1 IV ~ l~titFM3I U - .I~ IN ~s~ I I f• ~s s r ~ r ~J I - JAI Q. L r t ` THE DENTON PLAN L-E[D*)~, - f fi, ~?rI~ iycn i ` a eiL '9 ~~r` 1 L. i. 32 X Y• h I • o 1 ( N 1 CITY OF DENTON ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS INI PA CfSA MPLICAT IOM y CORRIDOR URBAN CENTERS NEIGHBORHOODCENTLHS COMPACT GROWTH -High 1, ciliy l"hopmlet seer n le l pill,, nor to. IS, II my a flMrdten we ern I'm • A later Mlady end Assail, or Not 1114111 hborA"/ •D"dapnnlY+Irbil AllAned fmdeSornSoedi3n x L bond, aloes m.)., lhomi,ghfoln And high rays. wI, his Me City • D..mloWm CIA ter, Comm aerial Cenrtn Came" ampsred U Lots, Ca herb afloat SI boundary. >`L,• •Orc-IR1"un pdmatn, le .,all land rich limited And Alromm Adwttdd Cter. •Netlhb•"oed Cents" Arne 111 At the hhMelon • AINJOrly e1fdmdle;0I Nrun MAIN 116801 arbor f i rein, nllnrnl, rrdmlopmnund bell srthi, •U6.0 serial an located at the InteeaMlonaaf Major of major ldorwpfrrn era mnuli minrnlmal ndatolopmool Aid teCn P •0•ae11 a kwi iy land .110.11".. Iris Nish l Actrate 1. • I alrillig fatly A Rd klenlte) IN ml W.neewA dnelopmnt y N den, lilt, .long so rridnn, second b 101heit.111 in the • A 11111. I.dy led done ly o f eel IOhl U,tAO Anmeetlal grewa login . round salghteb,id teol,n formula In hetntly adfnfly of hung onvIregoolaq 1`111-61 loop and low,, fraly o.DVo floor. Coles. 'llnid.4e1 am dnelop+Ithin Walking dhann pal,te Is the Do.ati p!p- -Del II.Pn., may hone. mSir, .1 ar hap frog penlrn. -Limited robe,nrmnl led adtr.lop meal of D. ..N wn (n'=F. 311 to r9 a 01) of neigh barhuaderasure. Hlpk atloAp dateline Irdlm the growth bovedary ^ (not a%ita .1 1111 or NtigbharboneMajor ammo^h l oodre end hfuel,Uf districts falls. MIlk%ilkM density n Dowaaslneg lndly g"nednl 1i amid, as dull'" from De.en.a Nameless. -Inmate. of land stn wlm I.M. an l•,A no Me," woo -Landau MMhork. Una 110114. •$.PA rN= N Sold ail"sort *"is Neighboebeal -Mix ed lo M Nls I IN me fall" moth bNeMiry, • M61 be edjoc,ncy less go. with Mask Jim sly 04 •6m mer,41 Urbe. Conlon Far 0 mla efs'lon. Carter I'd Dewate.a. • PUIrkk Wink Si k"bdery boom primary long els monraldnlhl d...ga Ml commercial old high density rat dmttrt 1I .;,ad els dndepat one slight. rho Ndpb,,mkd tot ocum sballow "pp.4nl an • hla l new do .lap man l loH•Iy it wecde of De. n io- n; •Alrp"I Urine Cents' 611 In4r4 del win sup M nlnl (i II me he bl en oom be t 11110 the Dowokwa- mInlmelMmatledOne11D...is., orrws a Wad o. m lmntAl ern. • IS linr4!mnl and fodndermoei an my "gut DOwnaWa witha greater ln4pniho grain loth worllnAy • Do. now. 4 MVd s,I real,, on k Kl a rms. 'fie"n beill, IIIIII'lianel I'" bin Algal, deftly to bs now lee he lone: I, led dneiy or safe. And herhonwily, • M•n,Arlo) of roddaual Nylon. e.,,ftellol ate ehe.V be eatarr,gMalong the freeway. Dowel.. 1111 ran Crnldor, J,bm Cater •ndn.nlm.land rd"Jepmfal May otter De.aaWa 5 C freer land one lee umll.der A ON k If am; lee Rnk.alar pow O lurrou,01 erbmA ralmw 1161 ]n"r" M k.InI M Intensity gad dealer Al eaa .pkua... a Son d ipn. ,d delegate In Oonny a distant, bom bombe longer • Llmlled am go -,,go be,ldaltsl. Dowglawe h Marl barge rho gnat ten wloa CA m m 1,1 Sol map l... opm.nlnmy afar, Mcneseo. •0, M, AOe.rnW.lbl 041rk4 would aefemmodah • Len 11.4 als of help$of lmm.nd plan ra piety 4mildn4ILy pet Inda441 And r0. regional oemwlrelol AO,NIOke. • Apk+la"l toed w"m nosy to greed In So v" • Com ma my Related rem Miller lrrelep meet might slow, sulfide or the Inwlt bee edgily. of Mme tet.dery reset M1 •7A,rough At rat would IN rob ably follow A padded II nol -Abler Noroulhf.r ytbm weld probably callow A •bh]"no"ugh hen w"W pnbby, fallow l poldM • The Avontfin tI 0,:hfkj"bbo"M petie, 1.Nel,literbood&,.tA. sets prubobty Iwile. a Irldd.f else patter, 11,M ptte A. Hrneri weam pnbeby lone. a wemeed M en pnm . tun 111 ease and tot do at pmra • Mini and sanfdair Poe roulSfm at.odl •Nrllarisol Meant lptem row be pmd.d or"nlless, a ello. M Mee reeekn a a of as bog. Lee,, d.mllknnddod.pmenrp.Itm meal mat, •Alnn rnlderwlal mnru would Net lirerdy h major -Omar iwnrm) to In asperse bbl eobrork; elmes •Lggp Initial, Serengethl D"n1A.a my rnatrg O Im,11 k4 tea Nle. n..il $,fMfet)Network . Nike apaMy buns the am - h Mor, miles or Mlhwlyr end itree4 required. Deady a- li Casten fillies Mel ln.ell more ]eeondaryf/M lyn.n sari Ndghbortaad Conlon; • MaeInutl I, men 11, Iw a MOM dndM And r< •Mon ,.Mali mlln ntlrsaM1l.e umogolelphenpaf fiuibk. Mw"n AeaheapeAnlrhe seloLL aq pay be "Wed a New W"aspAnwnw soh y an lang.. TNe eeegdoa of Laap 288 would pnbahy be a ended Opparf.010s for meet 1m.til arms mom deals I• me mirmioinL ~ etas "nalua al Leap l4 n.Vproh.blyag"ded by 3021. • Tburftake at Loop lm may mat be Needed 17 M& •power ar a MDn.gand mgt Radom barrelling No by 3020, • DMkoted bin loan led b1111rar, onm M sopped l"wn• Nstinlr, eMa lieymM am Herd • nteblW eL "parry "mm LA fgglmd" led ref yeloen is f appore Hgtn drolly lnnopmnlW slow me"" • ' • The "teak" M loop 311 a1 orm may pled Los model began UM • Dflka W MI Lon AM kAN fen, rem M , r> 30) x e alAiAmn + : e t p 1 , r , C~ CITY OF DENTON ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS IMPACTSAMPLICATIONS er, CORRIDOR URBAN CENTERS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS COMPACT GROWTH - 'NOM "I lydemt could k limed for dnlnrye. NUSnI would to pmried for dnlnage. • Nanrarniasr wmW be ymrrd W drain age. Moo lake IN Ito tart and thadnoage AWN to rke some •Lln,e pmrlu on Ito elnontuld,pr epxrrilb trots •LO"rporke rid eulnmmnol spot rpaoolrl lrlrb • fkeu ON rho and nvirmnenul pea yin a tInto Oath wont metmutual bandeq utlalt p ooh < z r00W N nl.1,11i1ng in flu lied polo d m. eodd he uobs,hed in the pod plain gnu o pro, by, for amid be"bhhd in IN flood plate Move to prseldr • NaHnl rydom rBob# be pouring M drainage. r C • Na Is the milonbl pats boo'. dos money ud adagboehod poulm regional park ends hr ps,J" tyand park ands • Nrlpllarhmd build apupae dooW M doped L perk. in open to.,,:, at e...e ul to ON 0.... pork •Abnemory ra tood rlnbawpwq 90014 N Abaadoned railroad rlbWrRwq c.W be IsnwllPd at CYy".lot ht yid peas ~ eL yuem. tied for bit, and the inks ud or hat ld Mkt mfio. • fhnr plu got nalnsentol yn yin Nil used Abandoned railroad rllhtraRwy rail/ be •hbh on yen Both, table be entitled 01110"" Nelphbarkeod prim kneed*thin "him rid/ M a:obhhd k the ltd sides one hr puhed Z W ud fort IN. or d blkt look 011 ens, 'highs"' n"nue"I sppdm dl""old M proelded pork seeds Y C 1 •Ae/loed runirlnal ppinunho9"aid N pa,Wed is be Upshot pt, yens IN pOweWeM knler reglseet • Abesdnd nAnad AIFlNdwayfosW be ad he 614 y limo park yuem to ptnW. far arlle initial park park sods Rod the Into. T it, • A Who "lldgd part dla"N o Qe Amor park symes k: 9"111, hlsbfbad hr all" pilot Iftilig star, pun and her, 1101 probably N,teaod • Man pike Bad firs 10,1110",0014 pnbobly to •plut pike and" hnhima mW probably led rdgdnd • lnor potion and An fmadd werW pnbsNyIN U 1.111 the dry-, hoop tests Boom bon euHhm nsdrd compared is Compact pta"Ila; karat "spmd is little Carton U44" banner tilde* rayabse o Banks AUSd11rr/myepble am p ter Wed lhootd N, moth in kill ote.ll N lea the I C"rN-, peneld d" o mm, Operate who p,ehdiy be lma11.r he stale. bewne dwm, poet may dad Is be IN rye. 14 •pton milt, , Ittr"o t n w wto rdl to rgdrd. Cenlly r"mlrirtom a hood CulaM1 lea mill" damn and ddwin Amid be made •lntrktep lnwdO U a m.rkr gegnpha in, wl11 •The "n o pre m, pubtl, anion o probably lWhr Mon oil" M motto Id.111sli" led, Compe" the I ..time lfrka Crib gemnla mats, be oa s, lea at rims, led NLLldas Bob td non dbpmd pots d prowls, peenuh; Crone oseald he lm in, CorrWar kn"IO •PA W k sraW pbte, bank" mut he klnha • Tke rd be ywt pbh e,rvba it one at tlltn 7. • May to non dltikdl 1. be,, .dq..h mpnn unto The jaw, he ps,W. embh Mreli" de.W be here them ehu Comport Lenaro hi shsoW Mb ones Canada dusts" (nth Quo" bowed room tlgsg 0i - far BAN tangy. Cot gn"rbe bit, n it be is kw is Csmpal L"s M. •AMsW be "der o have dpmala rapes llnm her { a 1J f Serl to dnldk"e"a tend MoariipaM fisaM hobhuhey ft b.1 usnflkmp~ bmeded. - < •Cremrdkn«t Nfran nkools Leorba asadlM s I z + nro.npd In room ape,,"Irma, ens pbodd k,aor hshv odeswna mpety lint" par path oky. • newel, lueM" *saw Mkw dM grWdd anal toe < bogie ohry s herd a tnlAe ueyaos b Indd •Schab d00la N Mated Nthm Nunlhrkad Con ten pain 0i Y lea dkann bdn.m Mtoole rhos C, TWO, p"iudo. shN hen" ped"ldsa gun. hill, rpm pus od . • Location, dmW N eonunnng In aged pan norm" Mtge phypnad some OLIN be nmliad worth eta ants. NdtglbaMd Cole. ` F Il. 1 I. l,. • n S ,e .F r , w e -..Y11 1 ;yet nee; x 10 32 x 1 0 p i ti r I' CITY OF DENTON I ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS POLICIES ey CORRIDOR URBAN CENTERS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS COF:PALTGROWTH tz I 7 ccyCpolicy mromlln[ high lnlsndty d.14hpmml 40 'aA4 Panq luppnEpg tllt0 klutly and Sleepily or h[7 Wlpenlnp Al OeatopmulA.IghbortaOd nnLn AlolrleeHNrAa IN-* 11,110447. A• deny A'gA.gr old moor lhora.lh%r.o deokpmal at Urboo Cason ortMn.IdratlA umrdlk 11418 IA m lye wlhing FF eflewce Ar midmn, Porky "lvdint neon able IRAN eel fxulh (4 PAlq leppaning b yh dopey dndap mm l 11000 Perkyk"ling Urboa C, o late at n.Jaf lAttaatloal h4ho brolly load In De.ebwl"IA led retkeIs v m4Jtr mrrWOn a/. lihin Dawea%n. end/.1[".11 AS IbAr Ad. eel Ott D.4. coma ledol rang n.lln0 that edghbadmd ennrn war IRen a dmtMy if the date m4 from Dmkwa bendnl ti art lad.trleig pelntrlaa leer end aA M build It Meer Innnntle"s C pulley ee..urglni lnn0 d.,I.p mml I'd ninrnrmml. tut belle/ at larn.Ilons d lemabq arrow Fend" Sewing lad 4nNanling"I"welal mod p. p Polleln plding and Intowling nln..1Mal I'd 0" I kr.tmml Downb.l Panty mpportlnI'on• ntmmi andaa• Inr All mono Inodmnt Do. slaw". I Ackslubin01nd 1tmun01M e1nrnlmml a/nw > D'.nto.m Am trimmant Noted A, p. 7 Porky mro.nll"[ 0,1114 had IN -IIhI- 60 park" anmer.iing mind are b'.Nm. a. Parkin l.ppartlnI MI led te n4 am w%h It Wawa Cmtem t4e4tbo.had Canton den lppnprler• Particle, tuppocdol Mll d M do•ebymutt for P.Ilq wo...pq M, Lmr-.lion ofa'uwk m rwt.,n Poloki upporlin[ mked ait dmfnpmrnn DO.-lawn. Palley entar.glnl the pmerntla4 of hklafk mrutlwel. Panel mompniq 1,41 'ItImIty am 00.110.A v O F.I1,knla1del.lebd .m 4dl.eenq keen Porky mou.. Slog in, pr4mm311on. I Awwk mnebrn Polley a....ging 64 d01kpmell of eilbbarboede perky meangiq AepnArn1rb11f lkNrle nnatarn T< land nd4hb.thad Cat.rh J pricy b dyke unl4 11,1pe0mmenhl Trllopnat PaIlq 101940111 the beatkN of ops spin and the pary 7mltiq 04 lreolpaml 6111 a eatldraaeg d.e.pMNl orlnsnietknrt a," and hishot d4mlly Porky YwidnO the dumapmal of krp bt nlNmelA PengAs dr•A.p ae be. domlln pldrn.e ear wAidan mideotlal_0%009 IN rm w lyo Panel lntima"9 g Its lrorm~lka Rol kuhenk land. A ~ Farley aneam01p rho eawnaMe doykahrnl heel. ~ a Perky to darkp IfamlAtem k a pWded pane. Perky I. d..Aap ibarplh Ern In l grwded Pon,,,. Porky it dn.kp thorwihfene IN l lrwdee Fames Pony pop.n101 a SrWdd NM pones r Paney to d"lig alOAWA.ad $I rrk is a e.IJawe Palley i. dnedp l lralp,ma.n I lnm olikt supports poky It 00414111 lnapn.lla yr.m whkt b. l pulleys NpprMg 602, npeDy or k"aoyor ell" and t.,fli"eer pun., tee mronyn% See dmdy l...Upma111: Uete l Cenrn Mil de-.lopd"cap b7 mloan Ntkh INemb 04 1yleet to lapporl DonlnM. ' 1eIlA1or1ae0ta44a I < Porky 1. wppan the R,vi,m , stitr of tran lumil PoA7 pupperting like lmpkm Aetbo of Moto lrlmlf Panel pppnranl Ali lnAopmA ofm III MM.P. C t. thI W.,I l..rlt it V Mmt IAN teeneportmb. Need, of IM UAa Cent," Polk? loppr1101 Pool Rem to As 111S1ban N/ p I n l athef aem of the Cp. antes Mley lappoAng Al lnmepr.t of lnmporblks 'A Pandn fnro.nd'ArA, temllaad enpill.Na eplnq bt%.d sot develop rklk not IN.A Monde ry I werrmld, ealkkl lnea.reiing mod ot rlnman 44 Le" 601 NN Poky As lgpon Ad lm plrmp111ba of Mato IN-III d"0 rmlMlq Al NpbaeM1 ar11r Nab ptewe of ' II p arlmnod wAo 1,1W M,Rk. Rot Sell Mabry. ti.,]p Fdkl ayprtinp M dnMpmlol orbAe ism 1d" ~F Nh la "A a Fro[Nah J I 1❑ 32x10 7. P-P I CITY OF DENTON AIXERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS POLICIES CORRIDOR URBAN CENTERS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS COMPACTOROWTH f r ~ Palt/guppWlns lAr penrvaWn ofblYnlrytlrmA paAq luppeWlns d, Panenulesdwronrrymmr. polled MppeWk(de PrecnaTla afananl fyfkml, pvpq MppeWlnsT4 ornan+IbndMhnlrymewa Y polity 60drvdoD home !,rk qIlam to nodPIda Po M17 "took! line DIrk qIlan In flecol k hh+y M /nero1 Danr ! q port Wm he Rat1kla ►sMy M➢DordM 60 of rant Be boAad < Z P ~ J Q e.I, he lmed,s pA 1411,llln Been time pillPark aelhkln. A me hr jl PIA Badnlllaa IoM loan. y6 3 Polity la pponly the derdopmnt of lam mi.ii hbry fopponlnb da de0dopment ornPknalperil patty MppaAM eta/aellap,at dryknryprW htky la dra10p baler PIA 0) won IN lAedplale S Bad YdghEehad pvW eenmrled lu Aver adjacent a The later pan gltam for d,lkl ns10ul a/)aemit is at lose perk gdnew for act"rryknd ants kr pupil park keyrh10s F U pea poem fm nits paA It vWI, /ark weds park aaeda Z Palky M de,lq l loose ril PIA the Mhr Y fillet Mppamki milk n I.lb pnpl me. ►.lky wpponiy nM1 60 trBlb prasr,ma hnq INgg q deelopm MO or Peru 010,14 PIA orth kits seT(bboAaed ecolan 2 policy yips, Will de /edepmml of ON loan and psllry erppenks the laebpmneaylhelama lid tnM1 led mippem1'(nRMInM1 PMpnm IRA and S.PpoAri n M1 to IM h pryMmt. J pill, a pn,lde patlk onkn Is a cal rlAdne flit is pall, pAN mm less la a far eMka1 F.Tky Is pall p.blk tsnk, Is IoM a gkkal Polity w pules Pblk note Is a e,n thkknl Indira, and 60 lea le 0„Ilhk l t,A ohsUdeynl, Paean ar 4411(.1 oll or. Mc4 TAM adegaM weaer Bad 10 bMk 4ePwka Net the a drynts saner lid M leas ke/kIn MA List olivillifill p.blk "rely rn nos Il me :e be maintained poll me rely mlmnts IlmM In be nalaMined p.bne Mhq aspects d" no to sell tabM1 wkly r"Paes times me N arabinlnd J, and the pilot IN. •:,•nlrnl a new to City wnlrr. and As lablk IN,,a,nnlcal annl Is Coq knke, a/ this pYbd b60 eaaanleae BeMM Y Cup tsnkn ad M plbhc 10 navari kcrw 60 Clq"nkn .S I pihcy loarapn( khol kin mem. n be adjkMl60 Polity 40 MYM(Ins khal 10011011160 be edl0eal M patty emennyi ktal kcarka and Mail. Cup pBhy"I, News wale led wagtawa60r kmta am •60 o' G more time eRrld,n .pin gaaeonldon +enkM OOt M near"" M lonbd-lnk the jh t1thMl PM+lq as knklq dale gain aAMla p o Brl(t1YAale mile 01A a inn a Pedntrhs aMssa Ill area bindery. z Pa" Msm"Ols combkk( pabn, elms open poAq me, "is" petal blMhM as lo/o. dr nod kind Ony ,Aa Pr1lled little Pau,r4. i IF IJt 3 0 l _ 32x pI ~ +d, ~ 2 ti ~ i7 . 0 t - E I City of Denton Planning and Development Department ! r • 221, N Elm Street ? • • Denton, Texas 76201 Voice: (%0) 319.8350 Fax, (940) 349.7707 , e-mail. davehCiglobal.net wuw:httpV/www.ci.denton.tx.us -111- f II x :r o , (EC E O V E 15 15 Linden Dr. HLJUN Denton, TX 76201 June 02, 1998 41998 1 Dave Hill, Planning Directs 221 N. Elm St. Denton, TX 76201 I , Dear Mr. Hill and Members of the Planning Committee, I attended the May 29 meeting at Boman where the four scenarios for Denton's future were presented. I like many aspects of the "Neighborhood Plan," particularly the Idea that one could simply walk to stores or work. I was born in New Yak, just outside of New Yak City. My family did not always own a car, since it was not necessary. We walked to xhoo?s church, the grocerystore, the deli, the five-and-dime store, the post office, and all other offices where we paid our bills. These neighborhoods were built from the start to be mixed-use areas of apartments and business. I can remember only a handful orprivatelyowned homes. Currently, I live near Denton High School. It Isn't feeble to think you could tear up entive neighborhoods to put x in apace for enough businesses to make my life canplee. Three years ago, l voluntarily took an eoormous pay cut ; . to work in Denton. 1 consider myself very lucky, but few half-way-decent•psying jobs exist in Denton. Although am still in my field of work, computer programming, there are only* handful of jobs in this field in Denton. If everyone walks to work, well have a great crew at the neighborhood fast food shops. Unless everyone owned theta own businesses, neighborhood employment is a big dream. I think one of the keys to planning that was mentioned in the meeting I attended Is the need to limit growtb. Growth should be planned, but it should also be limited. Nearly everyone in attendance agreed the "small town" / flavor of Denton should be presert d. Planning, then, should come in the form of restricting building permits. Fewer permits should be granted, and not all new neighborhoods should be filled with homes over $150,000 and cspec!ally not just ones over $200,000. Wivtre are all of the neighborhood people-- walking to work, making minimum wage or somethingjustaboveminimm- going to live? riot In$200,000homes. Our city has already exhibited signs of division bete v the "haves" and "have-nots," I realize new development warrants new roads, new parks, new schools, new' tries, new civic service!,, but don't forget the oentra!, northern and western aides of town. It truly looks like the rich ;re catered-tu, while oh w services languish. (I do applaud the renovittion of McKenna Park recently, but I long complained over the condition of that park, while tennis courts and jogging tracks were built at South Lake Park.) Since the only businesses Denton attracts are either manufacturing (low pa)ing) or service-oriented (extremely low paying), the only drawing card Denton has is housing. That is the offer that's on the table right now, If it's not monitored carefully, this offer will become our contract with the disaster. Y Sincerely, . ~Ce U~cclr~ I . Grace Chalon t i s L V l ~Yry S ~ ! ' t EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 s fir' err, R~ ~~~W rl, it ~94 Cat ~x 10 A~ it .',V6 32X 0, 011101 • MOM O W" M i aLEGEOV Dr. Eva H: Cadwallader WAY 2 7 Philosophical Consultant 3920 Fawn Drive Dentoo TX 76208 940-566-3018 i Mr. David Hill Director of Planning City of Denton 221 N. Elm St. Denton TX 76201 May 23, 1998 1 I Dear Mr. Hill; j This is to repeat some of my concerns expressed to you at the public meeting regarding the Denton Plan as you presented it on May 14. 1 First, I am seriously concerned about the lack of definition of key terms, especially "mixed use" as it appears on the printed matter. In response to my question," Wher. does the term 'heavy industrial' appear? I did not find it anywhere," you stated, "I do not distinguish between heavy and light industrial" You said that you do not think this distinction important. I do. I stated that it looks as if the term "mixed use" would allow for any kind of industry, including heavy industry to be located in or near at least some residential areas. This is unacceptable to me. i At least the following terms need to be defined as precisely as possible: I. Heavy irdustrial 2. Light industrial • 3. Commercial 4. Business 5. Mixed use. (if this term is to be used in more than one sense, th to those different senses need to be clearly defined and their different senses clearly Identified on all planning documents,) Defining these terms should include precise specifications as to what i+ and is not permitted in areas labeled by them, & swell as a statement of what geographical distance (if tny) is needed to • , • separate the different uses. After being defined, these terms need, of course, be used consistently--on maps as well as on all city documents. EXHIBI Page 2 is 32XIQ, e C 2 i Failing to define terms precisely, and not using them consistently, is one of the chief causes of tensions in the community. Defining terms in an arbitrary and capricious way is another. Second, I have Indicated my distress at the lack of opportunity for timely citizen input into the democratic process regarding zoning In Denton. I was told, In effect, that people unhappy with decisions being made this year should have been around in 1969. Presentations of The Denton Plan i, are evidently supposed to address this difficulty. But at the meeting you chaired on May 14 we were 1 presented with assumptions already made. And it was not my impression that these assumptions were open to question. One such assumption pertains to the amount of growth citizens consider desirable in the next twenty years. Another assumption concerns the kind of growth as relating to its Impact on the quality of life of the residents. A number of people at the meeting I attended expressed themselves on this point. I am concerned that false dichotomies are being presented or Implied regarding the public desire for growth. The Issue is not for or Against growth as such, The Issues are how much growth? how rapid? and most of all whether growth is to be HEALTHY or not, "Healthy" here is to be taken literally. The most important Issue is whether Denton growth is going to involve pollution that endangers our health. The citizens of Denton should have direct input lato this Issue, and in such a way that their desires actually influence city planning and public policy. The democratic process In Denton ought to permit such input in a timely and ongoing way. If it is really true inat present law does not permit this, then that law (or those laws) need to be changed. Never again should anyone be told that they should have been around nearly thirty years ago in order to avert what they consider an assault on their health and safety today. Finally, l have a third group of concerns. This pertains to the nature of public meeting about zoning issues and Denton growth planning. For one thing, these meetings are usually presented as "informational" only. And citizens are ruled out of order for expressing opinions that aren't questions. Why is legitimate information flow only unidirectional in Denton? Then too, citizens are regularly chastised in city sponsored public meetings for "being emotional." Ordinary human beings are feeling persons, with passions about the living conditions imposed upon them by their city. They are not trained lawyers. Must they be disenfranchised for that? Is that what America is about? Recently an article appeared in the Denton Record-Chronicle bemoaning the lack of attendance at the meetings regarding the Denton Plan. (interestingly, I did not see an article reporting the content of the concerns citizens expressed at the mating 1 attended.) I can't help but wonder v: hether that lack of attendance could have anything to do with some of the concerns I am expressing here. i 1 have not filled out The Denton Plan Opinion Survey because this document does not ask any I O • of the questions I am interested In. On the contrary, it is full of assumptions 1 do not share. I also wish to comment here that the survey results reported on the front page ofthe May 23 DRC are another example of this kind of thing. "Do you believe growth in Denton County should be EXHIBIT 2 Pagn .3 1. - - ti:.~ 25 x 10 32xI Ma. I • 1 e 1 ' I encouraged?" is a simplistic question. Of course most people favor growth. The questions to ask are What kind of growth? Polluting growth? Growth that seriously impacts their health and quality of life? Responsible city planning should focus on HEALTH first and foremost. Second, as I have expressed to you in person, I am deeply troubled by the apparent lack of opportunity for timely citizen Input Into matters that concern their futures. Only one example of this is the fact that all four of the Denton Plan scenarios make the assumption that Dencon'e population will approximately triple in twenty years. The scenarios survey you have distributed d lot allow the possibility that the Citizens of Denton might prefer to limit growth to less than di , say double Instead of triple. 1 heard no discussion whatsoever of this issue. However at the meeting 1 attended I did hear many people state that they had moved to Dentor because of Its presently attractive quality of life, together with their fear that quality could not be sustained given the Plan assumptions. i In short, why foes your survey not ask people how much and whit kind of growth they want? i Sincerely, Eva H. Cadwallader, Ph. D :c: Mayor Jack Miller Roni Beaslev Carl Young Neil Dl!danCe Mikc Cochran Sandy Kristoferson i i t , ~ I • ~ iY. O ` j i`a 1 p EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 1.' t - -1-- Fry t k : % 2 0 32 ❑ • • 0 „awaco (E 0 RE 0 VIE ( 525 Mimo^.a Drive JUN 1 M8 Denton '.X 75201-0856 flay 31, 1998 F Mr, Dick Svehla Assistant City Manager City of. Denton Dear Mr. Svehlat You asked the people at the meetlig at Borman School, May 28th to write to you concerning their thoughts. i don't really feel that you need anything further if you were listening to the same voice., I did that night, Moreover, you and I know that few will follow up their concerns in writing. I will write to you for them. You and others in the administration and on the council, including the Mayor, should understand thoroughly that the overwhelming number of thoughtful, concerned citizens do not want growth as we are now experiencing that growth. We don"t want hundreds of new houres without sidewalks or acceptable wide roadways. If you listened carefully at Borman, you got that message clehrly and loudly. We DD want some sort of pro eerjanaj traffic administration. Complaints you heard at Borman are appropriate, in my view. Better to spend our money on traffic administration than on an architectural firm. Read a third year urban management text. We do N= want potentially dangerous manufacturing plants. in Denton. (Safety Kleen had an explosion this week.) We want the decision an the smelter reversci! We are especially irked that that type of plant was given "a tax abatement." :4here are your sensibilities?? Denton is not Texas City and we do = want potentially dangerous plants in the city. Such plants must be discouraged. We 0 want r.idewalke - in every new development area interior a- well as exterior sidewalks,, older areas should be assessed for sidewalks. The harsh macadam roads make walking people lurch and fall while subjecting them to unconttolled drivere. ore M want developers to build substantial streets, made of good materials and wide enough for the traffic anticipated. Bicycle pathways would he appreciated. The new landscape ordinance j will enhance Denton's landscape. The illumination requirements mu .t br c•.trictly enforced while ligh':ed signs sho<<~A the muted, J .~lniter aXHISIT 2 Page 5 II ' ~~y' K 25 32x10 memo" 0 a \ q 1 n I atnwmx , • Gott(,ttEtt-~~; AI•~cva~a~,:ve. I~LUG(c~tlle,l~ G✓e.Gltdv(c~4, j Aj 'ji G rvvvVlity' p o jLl f t 13 U1 V doll, ~ Mil ,Ij IA ~L(~va~ry I(1!<t.7 1 'Ybtk> Y•~3~!ci1 YEI~4ra 1~1i~C~a c4kev 44i2StI -to fpvovi'& vvP1I l'vlr~tu~rl~, 1o Bilk uvba~l '~~~prtwj , ~t1G wltd ZJ~ bulldtuy ' £x~vn ~61i~th ~-o~•ll l~i•~l, Fotolic~~ .{ira~ :~,ccEl( l'~ rt'I~lr'a C►4 cYr4lrl!ir 31[r10AJ }'o'TtrJ r A ~LDI/1 ~i11LtY'•"i'l~f~', ~v :`:~~1~ ;`y ::c"11'it:~r=v~~ -Pr 6(Eve0eA 111/r4G `tY?t!r~l~ /i:~~i}Cl,crv~ r' G, W1kat, Dil6( at4l'o1t 0 4-:W 4r It I dxYflv,tr of Cv.pxl,rSlrtel ~M011!CIII rPri(1 (C5 ~~voWklt iwl4vt'v4eoa 'ittCV11-k(6 U1vlty r)rellixvic6 l t':Adivew-1 ~lll~ ~'GrOVEt'~( l~I+ i17vc 1r 1ja iri1CVQY~r~ 4vhevve., t Iliif lIev C~Clv,ilr, eleucl, rv Yd-Aevel (»c~ea~%, ' ~.!*ivtliON %irctiwlt, ~Fi,lJtll[r~ ;+1kVG?~ill~ 65'°. p-~ 1 %✓tv,"([. 3µlorurb~i(fri W(tiL~t ( ~-ll;l1(*- _lfa vtIYLT~,h~rl,, ~ 1 G. GvVYI«~ ~~.f~"Elr~lt!trl~ ril[tty; ;-a OL btl iitll.-Ncoa•)IC, i I JUN 1 i'-. U 1 1 a p EXHIBIT 2 page 6 ; t r I ` tYti• r S 32 X 10 ' o ire . ..3, . ~(aii~ rtdflc~ t~tua ~u~ hcvlcvs pvabteoiN~ w+~l~ . pfuwnti jltt~l ~ t~i~~y ( omi, ~ P"ovew oloio 4;47 ycGitbvla AIAWIfelo C(/tl~litVNl 'WG1`i Ci (~iE Get rvlvb4r, Vok%'A4or.- , i b. GJould rv;idc~i~l'al i~a ~G ~~v»~i•l~c~ tai UYb~vt Cetiaw~ j Iik-e 4jie ~ ~F(wlc~t oveY hlove+o vtoeuAosoo, /r}ra►ly fav (oc~~Nkctevo}G I4uoKw APIA "~IrsJ- (wittC., eiubalwt~,tiorey II I f ~ 4 ?6oiiAeaitt3( E1YlAos, tedioxod' el l~1GV I~torCll~v1-Coved ll,lcv~c~s~~ w4l, 4ke, 10261•1 Cyr Cr6.b w4ev 4Z4 Aa(4;4I [eve( vii to - 2OMG I }Jetclkbovlioool GeAevw , jll<G ~~bG41~Ykej l~C ( bt^O11c1~V~4+t Ilb LOt1tG~Y~' trou(t~ 4e d }o iv-;ol,,,4e, "A e(&uiccc~s Ri 4tke, commuitki Dr p~vl,~p~ v~Qvee~ 3u2IID~II,G t'E~waes ~v -~lliil ~'o✓ 1l~lilr~y fi1cG ~7v{~h ~Svta( ~Vyw~l~ o✓ hGwictti I uewe-A o ecttlevop oliitk cooW vied )o lx, eepbio;W1 Wevii mOV6' ti-t,,c1 vii v,lupllev . tical" . foov, coYJ; lJI'O<.tti 4~y6e4 (Plet4s I ll(ovC iLkVCS411j N11 IE~-/~ uu,~i~lo;.31 t,t, tl~zvt•~~pv. e I ~lt~4tilk -4%% (e.OJ 46 cum deulce4 o1ivto ~vom~ 4a jt4 t'c ,riveti,eltiEs w+ ~ n~c~ 2~ t~c +kzs - -Rit"i woo(el ( ha 41y,- vYO vvbl 1f,wla(t1j , eotweuto'" <r~ves NVA • cOivefk4dA arc wwpleo of 4i4~5 c ei)atv~"J 4vete , Ym4q (.cc 41tL wix o; ust~, 3Yocnicl FYC( 54wc~,CtF-ttilc►L ,jve,.4 Wtvc~t~ ig K,tu( 5~vpitl Cd{ec~e6~vd. txxIBIT 2 Paqi 25 k ~l7 32X' r I WIN" PZ tovve:~-ialL i~ 1u~ suvv>~e~ bv4 Inae~n~ '~w!dev (,olvvzdo . bCec,t c(~~sw ~+5 ~a✓ atow} ' 30 +~ctw, taw ~ S 4pv-~AaA- a vxt MelvookA pF ~k1S ~Q erg' 9:r+t3vi~ ie 4,Ak Ke pv4A oll ~ht W4.4vt'c. I, 0map Love- bee" Cy~kev 6K AOtthl 4WC0, W`1 -Cov LUOV0, tia~ucsc Viet* ov -ko - ~vv'pc~~~ VLlve.6 tAyy~ 109t" tia ltit~~ -4~r~ °y`f `1 -41~ vev~ wae~l•~k~ tau o-C~v~l {~v~lc~~-O--~v{<<5 VeK~oin ~iCU.ta -~0 orvvve off', ~1. V>"tttty Wo tt vevr'l Gvbl plDf-a -Avmk 1 V(,vt-~ ~1V~ll~G►1 O+i~e-t~e~ 1~4ve~.~l.~ toliii~eati«s1,,,~0{~ 0~ GVf ~yV¢ ~ ~ I ~r I~~~va~>~vut-~wo usot~tcf ~~ecc1 lv 1~e ealti~~~lea~li r I rGc~cvt~v~~td ~~td ypo~✓adecl-C•khty iy ~ewc~ l~v~ Gx~iwtitiivv ~vtd -h'lw tb11t~V►91►41c1~. ~ t C , ~t { 1r, r EXHIBIT 2 Page 8 ; 32GX W 0 C CITY OF DENTON TEXAS CITY HALL WEST • 221 N ELM DENTON TEXAS 7620f (817) 566-6200 DFW METRO 434.2529 Date: May 8, 1998 To: City Council CC: Planning bt Zoning Commis on From: David Hill, Direct Planning and Devel ent SUBJECT: INFORMATION UPDATE -Alternative Development Scenarios Public Meeting Schedule The Alternative Development Scenarios were presented to City Council at their April 28th work session by our consultants, HOK. A series of meetings have been scheduled for public review. The r schedule and locations of those meetings are N 1 May 7" Sam Houston Elementary OOMPLETED 3100 Teasley N 2 May 14" Wilson Elementary 1501 Emerson #3 May 20e Rayzor Elementary 1400 MAlone N4 May214 Rivera Elementary 701 Newton n „ N5 May28'" Borman Elementary 1201 Parvin • db June 4" Council Work Room ~ Cky Ha>i 1 Presentation Materials dt Opinion Sunvy Staff has prepared a booklet for dismbution to the public of theAhemative Development Scenarios presentation materials. It includes the process for the Denton Plan, the analysis and scenario • utfonnation drawings, the impacts, and policies which may be needed should one of these concepts 0 • or A combination of concepts be selected as a preferred scenario to base the comprehensive plan on. C.WICBETHOTY COUWA INFQSI I CGPZ Update dw EXHIBIT 3 Page 1 "D edicatrd so QuAry serrkr" * ► 2.) X10 32XIO • 0 1 I. You are a color version of this booklet. Please ho on to this for the duration of the fix =a refer= during the cubhe and for WoA white version of the hearin&L fie public will receive a black and attachment you are receiving u the meetings or they are available at City Hall West An opinion survey that is detached from the body of the booklet is also provided. The survey reviews the impacts or implications each scenario for growth have and relates it to a level of agreenxnt based on direction of growth the City of Denton mtrllllavv. A consensus of the survey results will be prepared once they have been returned to staff and after the public meeting process is completed May 7" Public Meeting On May 7, staff held a public meeting at Houston Elementary School. 20 otizuts from the community attended Staff introduced the presentation as concept" grcmrth nunagement tools and options the City could undertake. A video was produced for the purpose of then nwetings with HOK presenting the four scenarios, which the audience v°xwed. Afterwards, the audience viewed the full in erdubits that were displayed and a discussion and question and answer period ensued Staff s will keep record of the issues and comments raised durutg the entire public meeting period f. ATFACHMEN' : Alternative Development Scenarios Booklet Opinion Survey r r s. • Page 4 EXHIBIT 3 Page 2 r ' ~ I IN ,yq Q , i_ O 1 r I i CITY OF DENTON TEXAS CITYHALL WEST • 221 N. ELM DENTON TEXAS 76201 " (817) 566.8200 DFW METRO 434.2529 Date: May 15,1998 To: City Council OC: Planning be Zoning Commission From: David Hill, Director Planning and Development SUBJECT: INFORMATION UPDATE -Alternative Development Scenarios 1 Public Meeting Schedule The Ahertutive Development Scenarios were presented to Cary Comm at their April 28th work session by the CiVs consultants, HOK A series of meetings have been scheduled for public review. The schedule and locations of those mectings are. M 1 May 7 h Sam Houston Elementary COMPLETED 3100 Teasley M2 May 1411 Vinson Elementary COMPLETED 1501 Emerson M3 May& RA)=Elementary 1400 Malone N4 May2V Riven Elementary 701 Newton N5 May28" Borman Elementary M 1201 Parvin N6 June 4'1i Council Work Room • City Hall Other presentations may include: Public Utilities Board Presentation May 181, 9AM Park Board Presentation May IS" 6PM ! Chamber of Corrunme Pending , ! ! DISD Pending DR-C Editorial Board Pending i a 1 EXHIBIT 3 Page 3 C WOETHtCIIY COUNCIL INF"15 CC•P2 Upd wdoc Page 1 INdicated to Quality Service" Amaff= 32 10 ,.r■rl~nrnf ~4 E 0 E: y S May 14e Public Mecting On May 14', staff held its 20 in a series o f 6 public meetings at Wilson Elementary School. Eighteen cepttul oath citizens from the community attended. Staff introduced the presentation as con. management tools and options the City could undertake. A video was used presemusg the four scenarios. Afterwards, the audience viewed the full size exhibits that wem displayed and a discussion and question and answer period ensued iuues discussed: • Transportation alternatives; individuals willingness to give up or use vehicles less • Life span of fossil fuels left to our disposal • Impact on our water resources; water sources planned until 2050 ■ Outside cities and county 4rW on all our resources ■ Population Data Breakdown byt what exactly the numbers include, such as student break& wns by commuters and residents • University growth forecasts? • Air Quality designation °Serious" category; meatues to relieve this, causes? Air quality a a problem t Protection of the core of the City that "identifies" what Denton is; its uniqueness; and makes it a town/city and notjust another suburb • Mass transit; regional connections, light rail use to the metroplex. for commuten • Performance Standards for industrial uses; induwW mixed use means providing other service uses for those industries + Firmly define areas suitable for industrial • Upgrade and tigl= up the zoning code ■ Current projects could be grandfadwed in or the City could mandate rezoning certain uses, although that has not been proposed ■ Electric deregulation effect on these scenarios • Resource availability is a timing mechanism in merry cases • The Ell area the City u capable of expanding to changes when we reach the 100,000 people threshold from 3,5 miles to 5 miles Upstream impacts on downstrevn within watersheds ■ Upgrade the pedestrian and cycling availability in the city, the neighborhood scenario would be viable in promoting this ■ Sanitary "er upgrades, upgrade inflow and infilt 2don standards n ■ Storm Sewers, capacities are low, need impeoveme.rts, overburdening of the system -44 • Upgrade code enforcement 1 ~ I t , s NW1 EXHIBIT 3 Page 4 I . C WC6ETKCITY000NCIL INFO15.15 CC-PZ Upduts.doc Pope 2 Vol J „ y e « I" ~ 10 2~ LA I - Im 0 'i l CITY OF DEN TON, TEXAS C)TYHALL WEST 221 N. ELM DENT(A TEXAS 76201 ?817)566-8200 • DFW METRO 434.2529 Date: May 22, 1999 To: City Council CC: Planning be Zoning Commission From: David Hill, Director l Planning and Development SUBJECT: INFORMATION UPDATE -Alternative Development Scenaios Public Meeting Schedule The Alternative Development Scenarios were presented to City Council at their Apnl 28's work session by the City's consultants, HOY, A series of meetings have been scheduled for public review. r The schedule and locations of those meetings are. N I May 7' Sam Houston Elementary COMPLETED 3100 Teasley N 2 May 14'" W1i son Elementary COMPLETED 1501 Emerson 03 May 2C' Raynor Elementary COMPLETED 1400 Malone 04 May 21' Riven Elementary COMPLETED 701 Newton 05 May 28" Bomw. Elementary . 1201 Parvin • 86 June 4s' ComcilWork Room i City Han 7 Other presentations may indude. k Park Board Presentation May 18'' 67M COMPLETED Public Utilities Board Presentation June I' 9AM Rescheduled • Clumber of Commerce Pending ` • • DISD Pending DR-C Editorial Board Pending EXHIBIT 3 Page 5 5-22 CGPZ Updete.dae Pap 'Drdicne 110 tWury se"W" ~s 2 IS x ~ ~ 32 X I O o , u i May 18' Parks Board Meeting On May 18" planning and Development Staff numbers presented the Ak native Development Scenarios to the Parks Board Staff explained the implications of each of the scenarios as they relate to the developm:nt of neighborhoods, regional parks, and bkyde traU The members of the Parks Board were also interested in how the different scenarios would affect the placement of new schools within the Denton Independent School District Issues Discussed; • Development of regional parks within the Compact Growth Scenario • How pedestrian and bicycle transportation would be irr p vd. • Development of schools and ocher public property. May 20i5 Public Meeting On May 200, staff held its 3'a in a series of 6 public meetings at Raynor Elementary Schoo4 Eight citizens from the conununity attended Staff introduced the presentation as conceptual growth management tools and options the City could undertake. A video was used presenting the four scenarios Ahem-Ards, the audience viewed the full size exhibits that were d'iskid and a dkmion and question and answer period ensued Issues discussed: • Residential density representations on the charts were by color - dwel.i,:g units per acre? • How transportation was reflected within each scenario. ■ Planning process to reach the preferred growth scenario ■ Sust"bility • Transportation alternative • Status of the Electric utility ■ Other communities using Neighborhood Centers and Compact Growth Scenarios + Citizens able to use bigxlej, sidewallks, parks with out driving to get there. ■ Nurture the city to provide good job opportunities. • Neighborhood Centers Scenario use of the core area of the city, • Emironmenul factors, ■ Green builder program ■ The number of abandoned buAdings in Denton • Use of architectum tegulations, A N IS" "theme" for the City, . How many people who live here work outside of the city, ■ Possibility of commuter rail service from Denton to DaWFt. Worth. May 21' Public Meeting J On NW 21`, staff held its 4" in a series of 6 public meetings at Rivera Elementary School. No ` citizens from the community attended Staff a continue to seek tnae opportunitles to dixtus the 0 Alternative Development Scenarios with the public, EXHIBIT 3 Page 6 i 5.22 CC PI Update.doe Pago 2 2S Io 32XIO now ..rren , o , s' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS CITY HALL WEST 221 N, ELM DEMON TEXAS 76201 (817) 568.8200 DFW METRO 434.2529 Date: May 29,1998 To: City Council CC. Planning bt Zoning Commission From: David Hill, Director Planing and Developm SUBJECT: INFORMATION UPDATE -Alternative Development Scenarios 1 Public Meeting Schedule The Ahemative Development Scenarios were presented to City Council at their April 28'x' wok session by the City's consultunts, HOK A series of meetings have been scheduled for public review. The schedule and locations of those meetings are: A 1 May Tr' Sun Houston Elementary COMPLETED 3100 Teasley P2 May 14" Wilson Elementary COMPLETED 1501 Emerson #3 May 2e Raynor Elementary COMPLETED 1400 Malone k4 May2l' Rivera Elementary COMPLETED 701 Newton y N5 Mx/28" Borman Elementary COMPLETED 1201 Pavia #6 June 4"' Council WA Room City Hall O:he: presenrtions may include. Park Board Presentation May 1861 6PM COMPUTED Public Utilities Board Presentation June 1' 9AM Rescheduled Clwnber of Commerce May 29" 7:30AM COMPLETED ~ 0 ~ DISD Pending DR-C Editorial Board Pending EXHIBIT 3 Page 7 55-29 MP2 Updale.doc pap•• 1 'De1lra:rd no Qua7i:y Smke" i~ ~t. n 2 ti x ❑ 32 x ❑ 1r~ • O . { WSW May:S6 Public Meeting On May 28', staff held its 5' in a series of 6 public meetings at Bonnarr Elementary SchooL Thirty- Five (35) citizens from the community attended Staff inaloduoed the presentation as conceptual growth management tools and options the City could undertake A video was used presenting the four scenarios. Afterwards, the audience viewed the full size exhibits that were duplryed and a discussion and question and answer period ensued r Issues uscussed; ■ Comments given during the meetings are not used at the staff and Council level. ■ Using the Compact Growth scenario would Unit the population through the planning horizon. ■ The current planning process isn't as responsive as the previous attempts. ■ Limitations on industrial growth should be enforced. The City needs more arterial streets which have less commercial development on them ■ Any commercial development on Loop 288 should have access roads and not on the train lanes. ■ Denton should be maintained as a bedroom community- ■ Marry citizens would be willing to pay higher taxes to limit growth ■ Use of the Corridor Scenario would increase traffic, ■ Focus of transportation should be shifted from the car to alternative forts of transportation. Mass transit, pedestrianism, and bicycles are an valid. More sidewalks and walkable neighborhoods should be designed for Denton. Safety is important for any pedestrian crossings. + Citizens of Denton do not want it to be designed like Dallas or Lewisville. + Promodon of the Downtown and Universities. ■ Use of t he Corridor and Urban Centers Scenarios would promote urban sprawl. ■ The Compact Growth Scenario is costly and increases density, but it saves open space and agricultural land ■ A combination of the Neighborhood Center Scenario and the Compact Growth Scenario would be useful to Denton + Planning process should be moved to a neighborhood level of input. Use of the sm4 area plans would be helpful in the neighborhoods■ Past plans of Denton have worked well. The Urban Centers Scenario is very similar to previous plans, ■ The City should maintain strict control on the implementation and enforcement of the plan. ■ Neighborhood Centers Scenario would be controversial, but with a combination of alternatives it could alleviate many of the problems the City u cxpenen•ung. ' ■ The City should require an environmental impact statement for each new development 13 • part of the. Denton Plan. ■ A survey of residents should be made to detemune if they want to remain a bedroom f community or become more industrial, J14 EXHIBIT 3 Page 8 529 CGP2 Update do: Popp 2 s r 1 r ` r 1,' ~+rS{ 75k10 32XIO i *owns May 20 Chamba of Commerce On May 29~, staff attended the breakfast meeting of the Chanber of Conurrrce. Twmty-two (22) dtIzens from the community attended The Ahentatim Devdopn*nt scenarios, Growth Projections, and Land Use Assumptions. Issues Discussed: • Questions about rebtionship to the North Central C rA of Cmwnmmu Population Data, i ' and the 2000 US Census, • The land value to use and the Land use to tax base percentage. • The process for the implementation of the scenarios. • How do we analyze comments / use of the survey information 8C direct comments at meetin ~ { School District involvement and boundaries. How taxes accrue to the district to build and E expand schools. ■ How is the city sharing and comparing data with the School District i, • The future planning of school sites, " • Pro-vim vs, reactive responses to problems, ' + School Districts • fiscal reality of how money rooftops / people / to schools ratio they can afford. How are schools timed, j ■ Comprehensive Plan Outline • Traditional porions/topics ■ Non-traditional topic • The Street ■ The Fringe (what's going on around us p=esing with the school district in planr4 I t' ( I1; i I 11~, a' EXHIBIT 3 Page 9 , &290 -PZUpdata.doc Ppa3 ~ ~ ~ 25)( 32X .,art - 0 ass+nv CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS CINHALL WEST 221 N. ELM • DENTON. TEX4S7620J (817)566.8200 • DFW METRO 434-2529 Date: June 5, 1098 To; City Council CC: Planning & zoning Commission From: Nancy McBeth, Comprehensive Planning Manager Planning and Development SUB! ECT: INFORMATION UPDATE -Ahemative Development Scenarios i Public Meeting Schedule The Alternative Development Scenarios were presented to City Council at their April 28' work session by the City's consultants, HOK A series of meetings have been scheduled for public review. The schedule and locations of those meetings am M 1 MAY r Sam Houston Elementary 0014PLE-171) 3100 Teasley N 2 May 141" Vrtlson Elementary COMPLETED 1501 Emerson #3 May 20" Raynor Elementary COMPLETED 1400 Malone N 4 May 21" Rivera Elementary COWLETED 701 Newton N5 May 28'"' BomwE:ementary COMPLETED 1201 Parvii • #6 June 4" Council Work Room COMPLETED c C:ry Hall Other presentations may include: Park Board Presentation May IS" 6PM COMPLETED Public Unliaes Board Presentation June V 9AM COMPLETED If Chamber of Commerce May 29'" 7:30AM COMPLETED + I ~ Exhibit 3 Page 30 6-5 MPZ UOU6.60o Pala 1 a. 'Drdicated to Quality Servks" . x r. it r 1 Iron w. 25 x I 0 32 x 10 • 1 t~MI~ O r7li'{4.'ri Jur.e 1' Public Utilities Board s On June 1■, staff attended the meeting of the Public Utilities Board The Alternative Development Scenarios, Growth Projections, and Land Use Assumptions were discasW during their regular agenda. t ■ Comments regarding land we percentages in Denton, average to other cities under 100,000 in ! population. ■ City could support 300,000 population within current zoned land area. ■ Compact Growth has a service boundary which could be used to control growth timing, area of growth and patterns of growth. ■ Reduction of the number of permits issued is one way to reduce growth. f A Preferred Scenario v.>71 be a blending of many components of each scenario. 1I ■ Commercial / Retall / Office within centers. i ■ Positive feedback on the walkabIty aspect. ■ Design quality standards. ■ Did not bite 6,z unaracter or the implications of the Corridor Scenario. ■ Implications of costs to City with spravi ■ PublictnLisponation aspects of plans. ■ Non-attainment status and mobile emissions, ■ SPAN - timetable for use of service. ■ Ii'ransit - requires long term plaruurtg & good growth patterns. ■ Economic impacts • higher for Corridors Scenario to low financial strain on Compact Growth Scenario with a higher quality of life. ■ Preferred Scenario will discuss relative scenario fiscal impacts ■ Interaction wiui Dallas and Ft Worth ■ Mcuoplex economy nukes it difficult to predict hidustrial growth The City can offer the land use opportunities. June Public Mceting On June 4', staff held its 0 in a series of 6 public meetings at City Council Work Session Room in City Hall. Forty-seven (42) citizens from the commcurity attended. Staff introduced the presentation as conceptual growth management tools and options the City could undertaker A video was used presenting the four scenarios. Aftemards, the audience viewed the full size exhibits that were displvyed and a discussion and question and answer period ensued Issues Discussed: ■ population assumptions • why 22; t M in 2020? Year& rate of growth can be adjusted. . ■ Opinion that density may not mean less expense, but land values go up. ■ Rates of growth • timing of growth • location of growth. r ■ State h Federal government, national control over roads and traruportation improvements. improvements are programmed over several }ears of time, ■ School overcrowding, crime, envivr_meriul issues • how we respond through the plan? J • 1Xltere do land cues go that benefit our patterns of growth) 1 ■ Locadon of industrial • always though'.',t was to the west • ■ Land use rights become defensible by law whe + land's zoned for certain uses. S p ' ■ Can the plan affect existing vo^in through the comprehensive plan? Enforce the comprehensive plan when zor t changes occur. ( ■ Af sty of the new earrings in the past year have supported trends to densifyr 6.5 CGP2 Update doc Pape! Exhibit 3 Page 11 • r 10 32XID i e i O 'h'blETJ• Market can drive density. • Balance of property rights to community interest Levels of mass transit oppommides, ■ Internal and regional transit systems need *improvements". a "good" system • Better to have a plan to reflea and reinforce communityconsensw. ■ Examples of traditional neighborhood centers. ■ Transportation! • What factors influence choices for growth management? ■ What is a healthy balance of land use? City Council should take the lead in deciding strategies. ■ What cities have 20 year plans and 75,000 population? What has it done for them? ■ Mixtures of land us: • to cost / valuation in taxes • Bedroom city vs. a singular community. • How will these changes affect the community? ■ Quality of life Issues • Environmental Quality • Development Quality • SersiceQuality i • Educational Quality ■ Where is the "Vision" for Denton • What do we want to be? ■ Prominence of universities and downtown j • Design Quality • Meeting times should be later. • Wants "professional" job oppomtnides in Denton, • Keep and enhance good character and qualities of Denton. ■ Slow down planning process/ more meetings are required. ■ Do not increase density, but diversity. Luke St wants to know about the Neighborhood Centers Scenario. ■ Consequences to decisions • including taxes. ■ Layout loations of future roads. • Keep character as "toga." li • How do we limit rates of growth? ■ More policy, more design and quality standards • Decide whether existing toning will remain in place, • f low do we make the comprehensive plan "enforceable?" • Use of "petitioner" amendments procedures to the comprehensive plan ■ lawsuits uphold comprehensive plans. Gvt we restrict the industrialization and locations of industrial limits? ■ Realistic goal for Denton would be between Urban Centers and Neighborhood Center 0 Scenarios in 10 years. • Planning should have some Saturday meetings. • Restrict to certain types of growth • Pick time and place of growth ■ Reiteration of [king Neighborhood Centers Scenario, ~ ■ How do you revitalize Doxmtogn? • How can we stop "heavy" • type of industrial uses? j 0 , • Do we have adequate plans for the landfill? (30 year solid waste plan) ■ Concentrate industrial at the airport ■ Extension and timing of western section of Loop 288. ■ Do Neighborhood Centers have special zoning or restrictions? 6-5 CON Update dcc Page3 Exhibit 3 Page 12 ` 10 32 X 1[ . • t 1 1 0 i 1 l• r 1 ? . i . e Design Gtuddutes • Creation of moved-use, how does it worts? • Difficult to find smO businesses to fill N4borhood Center, • Build into plat corridors and pfau for ovets that continue thro* town, (East-West, North ' South). t , 1. 1 r 1 . a A 1 I ~ /Y 1 J M '1 l ~ ' I ti• Y r ~1 1 I 1' i '.a .1 Exhibit 3 Page 13 &5 CC•PZ Vpdsts.doc Pape 1 1 tit; '•k x 4 aaam" Agohdo No Agenda Itemyq Dale. ~7n-a--_ AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: June % l"S DEPARTMENT: General Government CAI: Ted Benavides SUBJECT; Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding cable television rates. BACKGROUND: FCC guidelines provide an opportunity for cable operators to adjust their rates either quarterly or annually. For the third consecutive year, Marcus Cable has elected to file rate adjustments annually. The city is certified to regulate rates for basic cable service, associated equipment, and the hourly service charge. The city received the appropriate filings (FCC Form 1240 for basic cable service and FCC Form 1205 for equipment and the hourly service charge) on February 27, 1998. Marcus' proposed rates went into effect on June 1, 1998. The city retained the services of C2 Consulting (Ms. Connie Cannady) to review the FCC Forms 1240 and 1205. A public hearing, with proper notification, was held on Nlay 26, 1998. 1 he city has one year from the date of the rate filings (until February 27, 1999) to complete its review of the rates. The City Council's options are, 1. Approve the rates as proposed by Marcus Cable and which went into effect June 1, 1998. 2, Take no official action and allow Marcus' rates to stand as implemented. 3. Reject or modify the proposed rates and issue a rate order adopting the rates as recommended by C2 Consulting. I If the council selects option P3, the cable company can either: i 1. Accept the modified rates and issue any overcharges to subscribers as a refund. 2, Appeal the council's decision to the FCC. Marcus Cable's director of regulatory compliance and planning has indicated that Marcus' adjusted rates are the result of "certain external costs (i.e. programming), inflation, true-up udjustments, and increased costs associated wish delivering cable service, as allowed by the Forms 1240 and 1205." All Denton • cable customers have been notified of the rate changes on or before May 1, 1998, in accordance with O O FCC rules. Nis. Cannady's initial report nn the FCC Form 1240 (Exhibit 2) recommended a basic cable rate of $9.42/mo., S.031mo. less than Marcus' proposed rate, Upon receipt of additional information from Marcus, Nis. Cannady amended her original FCC Form 1240 report (Exhibit 3). In her amended report, she recommence a basic cable rate of $9,441mo (a S,01/mo. decrease from Marcus' proposed rata) } ~ E t , L f ~ f 36 X I O ~ I o _ e , c" a.rb C ,;k J".INLY /!n4'aL. 2i?w~f,GN.Y L. A9vM?v4a,! mow:>x,an .r »r.., ~ Ms, Cannady's review of the FCC Form 1205 (Exhibit 4) makes the following recommendations: Addressable remote control: $ .18/mo. Non-addressable converter: S 1.19/mo. Addressable converter S 3.221mo. Advanced analog converter $ 3.43/mo. I 1 Hourly service charge: $26.81/mo. I Changing Tiers: S 2.00/mo. Exhibit 1, Denton Cable Television Rates, consists of four columns: A, B, C, and D. Column A shows tl actual cable rates from the period June 1, 1997, through May 31, 1998. Column B shows the maximum permitted rates for the period June 1, 1998, through May 31, 1999, as calculated by Marcus Cable. Column C shows the actual rates implemented by Marcus on June 1, 1998, to be effective through May 1, 1999. Column D shows the maximum permitted rotes for the period June 1, 1998, through May 31, 1999, as calculated by C2 Consulting. ; Council establishes the maximum permitted rates (within FCC guidelines). The two columns detailing maximum permitted rates are Column R (Marcus' ealculadons) and Column D (C1 Consuhing's calculations). Rates shown are exclusive of the 5% franchise fee, r~ Section 8-136 (b) (3) states that "within 90 days after the (public) hearing, the council shall render a written decision on the company's petition, either accepting, rejecting or modifying the petition and reciting the basis of its decision." Therefore, a resolution stating maximum permitted rates will be brought to City Council at a future me( ing (prior to August 26, 1998). i PRIOR ACTION/RP.VICW: The city's Cable Television Advisory Board recommends the maximum permitted rates as recon,mcndcd by C2 Consulting by a vote of 6-0 (May 27, 1998). FISCAL OSWRbl TION: 1 The city receives 3% of gross revenues from Marcus Cable as a requirement of the cable television { franchise. EXHIBITS: 1. Table: Denton Cable Television Rates. 2. C2 Consulting evaluation of FCC Form 1240 (May 8, 1998). 3. C2 Consulting amended evaluation of FCC Form 1240 (May 15, 1998). f ' " 4. C2 Consulting evaluation of FCC Form 1205 (May 15, 1998). Respectfully submitted: ,II py a) B y Willi s j s Assistant to the City Manager f 1 i Prepared by: ' • • JV-I \ R, t :yAD\ Richard Foster PiOt'nhkTY, A~endYin lnSl,rdAnUV110 dne Public Information Officer 10 32XIO I ~ , +t ar~sasr 0 t , Exhibit 1 DENTON CABLE TELEVISION RATES A B C D S Recommended' Maximum Maximum Permitted Rate* Permitted Rate Edstioe' (Marcus) Proposed' (C7) effective 611/9 effective W/98effective 611198 effective 61119 Basic Rate $ 9.881mo. S9.45 S 9.43/mo.' $ 9,44/mo.' Basic Remote Control $ .131mo. N/A N/A N/A Addressable Remote Control $ .161mo. S .18 S .18/mo. $ .I Vino. Non-addressable converter $ .95/mo, $1.43 S 1,431mo. $ 1,19/mo. ' Addressable Converter S 2.57/mo. $3.80 S 3.25/mo. $ 3.22/mo. Advanced Analog Converter'' N/A $4.01 S 3.95/mo. $ 3.43/mo. Hourly Service Charge SI9.03Av. $27.49 527A9/hr. 526.81/hr. Changing Tiers S 2.00_ S 200 S 2.00 $ 200 Cable Showcese•'• S14 24/mo. SI6.39 Column A consists of actual cable rates from June 1, 1997, to May 31, 1998 Y Column B consists of the maximum permitted rates as calculated by Marcus for the period June 1, 1998, to May 31, 1999 Y Column C consists of Marcus' proposed ratrs for the period June I, 1998, to May 31, 1999 Column D consists of the maximum pematted rates as calculated by C2 Consulting for the period June 1, 1998, to May 31, 1999. Council sets the maximum permitted rate (within FCC guidelines). The two columns detailing maximum permitted J rates arc Column B (Marcus' calculations) and Column D (C'2 Consulting's calculations). 0 t i . , • Exclusive of s% franchise fee. ; AMT + Turner Broadcasting System (Channel 18) will move from Basic to Cable Showcase * • Mnton system currently not capable of using this piece of equipment. Expanded tier; rates regulated by FCC rIO+Ceblel VK'ab1e1 V R&" doc 3 ~ `craw r E sr'tiF : L" 1 25 10 32 X10 p 0 i Exhibit 2 INCINSULTING SERVICES, INC. 7801 Penaoss (972) 126-7216 Dallas. Texas 75248 (972) 726-7216 (lax) May 8, 1998 Mr Richard Foster Administrative Assistant Citv of Denton 215 Fast McKinnev Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mr. Foster. C2 Consulting 5cnices, Inc. ("C2'1 has completed its review of the FCC Form 1240 submitted to the Citv of Denton, Texas (the "City") by Marcus Cable ("Marcus" or the "Company') on or about February 27, 1998. The following report provides a brief discussion of the issues noted during the review, and C2's recommendations regarding potential City Council actions for establishing the maximum permitted monthly basic service rate. 'this study does not constitute an examination of the financial condition of Marcus or its parent company. Therefore, C2 cannot and does not express any position with regard to the accuracy or validity of the financial information provided by Marcus during the c, arse of the analyses. OVERVIEW OF THE FILING According to the information provided by Marcus, services received via the Denton headcnd total twcaty-five basic senice channels t According to the filing, Marcus f • currently charges 59.88 for basic service and proposes to decrease the basic service rate by S0 43 to $9.45 for the period June, 1998 through May, 1999. I There are three major factors which explain Marcus's proposed changes in the basic service rate for the Denton headcnd: f r ~ these counts are as of January. 1998 Marcus is proposing to move one channel (1VT85} Born the basic f senice tier to tier 2 as of June 1. 19911 1 4 rM ;,ail 7 ICJ 32XIO J 0 ~wraevu j Mr Richard Foster May 9, 1998 Page 2 I. Marcus' proposed computation of external costs for the true-up period results in a three percent reduction to the external costs included in the 1997 pro,;,cted computations (decrease impact). " 2 The impact of removing WrBS from the basic service tier during the projected period reduces the residual costs and the external costs included in projected rate components (decrease impact), 3. The net true-up calculation proposed by Marcus shows that the actual rates charged during the true-up period (June, 1997 through February, 1999) were in excess of the rates as trued-up in this filing (decrease impact). jII ANALYSES OF THE FILINGS I Project Objectives and Activities The project objectives are three fold: 1. Assessment of the completeness of the filings with regard to the information and documentation that must be filed with the City. 2 Assessment of the reasonableness of the proposed computations in light of the City's prior rate decisions. FCC regulation and recent FCC rulings. 3 Assessment of the reasonableness of the proposed computations in light of the system specific costs and subscriber data Given these objectives, C2 condt cted the following project activities: a Review of the filing to assess the completeness based on the FCC Form instructions a Review of the tiling to identify any issues with respect to the data and•'or methodologies employed by Marcus s Submission of follow-up data requests and subsequent review of Marcus's responses 1 a Review of recent FCC decisions that may have an impact on Marcus's proposed methodologies or the City's alternative actions a Development of potential altemativcs available to the City In establishing maximum permitted basic service rate J~v i Will s • ~a 0 Mr. Richard Foster Slav 8, 1998 Page 3 I Summary of Findings j C2 identified three main issues with respect to Marcus's proposed computations of the basic service rate. These are I. Marcus' proposed computation of programming costs for both the true-up and projected periods do not appear to reflect the costs for the particular period in question. 2. The supporting documentation provided by Marcus does not support the Company's proposed copyright fee increase for the projected period. 3. Marcus has incorrectly computed the basic service rate reduction related to the r~ movement of WTBS from the basic service tier. 1, Computation of Programming Costs I As you are aware, a major component of the basic service rate is the cost of providing certain programming services, Based on the Form 1240 formulae, these costs are included as extemal costs; the level of which is projected in a given rate year. In the rate year following these projections, the estimated external costs are trued-up based on actual expense. 1 he true-up computations of programming costs provided by Marcus includes the averaging of both known and estimated programming costs for the last two months of the true-up period (i e, January , 1998 through February, 1998). In C2's opinion, any true- up computations should not include estimated increasesldecreases in programming costs; such calculations are contrary to the Form 1240 concept of 'Vue•up". As provided in FCC Order 93.397, paragraph 79, " as part of the annual rate change, a 'true-up' mechanism is available to correct projected cost changes with actual cost changes." [emphasis added] Therefore, C2 adjusted Marcus's proposed computation of"true•up" programming costs i to reflect only costs that are known. The impact of this adjustment reduces the basic J! service rate by approximately 50.031. l • r The "known" costs provided b blarcur were bestl on the told costs y per subscriber for the basic service flIr tier C2 requested programming costs on a "per channcf" basis from Mucus, but the Computy responded that such information was confident ial and proprietary C2 not es that other cable operators have provided { s the " per channel" information which allows fora bemt understanding of whether the pro7osed changes in programming costs are reasonable 6 I t 'AW z5 t , • 32X 5w.~r_,. x hC1 0 ~eura~aa , i i YYASeaa Mr. Richard Foster May 8, 1998 Page 4 ' 2. Computation of Copyright Fees Copyright fees are also a component of the external costs included in the basic service E rate. As with programming costs, actual copyright fees are used for the true-up period, and the projected period includes an estimated level expense. of a rise. Marcus estimated the projected period copyright fees based on a five percent (5%) increase over the actual "per subscriber" true-up period costs. Based on a review of the anticipated revenue on which the copyright fees are based, a i fire percent increase in the amount per subscriber for the projected period does not appear to be justifiable.' Because the basic service rate is proposed to decrease by $0.43, it follows that basic service revenue (on which copyright fees are computed) will also decline ,4 'Therefore, it is O's opinion that the five percent increase in the per subscriber copyright fee should not be allowed. The adjustment reduces the basic service rate by approximately 50.003 3. Residual Coat Impact of Channel Movement Pursuant to the Form 1240 formulae, channel movement from one tier to the other must be reflected by a transfer of the "residual cost" for that channel. If a channel is being moved from a particular tier of service. the transfer is calculated based on the residual cost shown on Worksheet 4 for the tier in question. Conversely, the tier to which the channel is being moved reflects the residual of the tier from which the channel is being moved adjusted for the difference in the number of subscribers between the two tiers. For example, assume that a channel on the basic service tier is being transferred to Tier 2 service. Also assume that the basic service "residual" on Worksheet 4 is $0.50. Finally, the number of subscribers are 1,000 for basic and 800 for Tier 2, Worksbeet 5 should rellect the following computations, Basic Service Worksheet S Adjustment (S50) Tier 2 Worksheet 5 Adjustment $50 i x 1.000 • 500 + 800 S ~ 50.62 S Copyright fees are based essentially on the amount of revenue received for tiers of service that carry broadcast channels and distant satellite channels C2 is not recommending a "downward" adjustment to the level of copyright fees, because such decline > assumes that the number of subscribers In the true-up period will remain the same during the protected i period Marcus has Inctuded a pro)eeted subscriber count that reflects a five percent increase over actual r " December, 1997 counts rho efore, any increase in ro enue due to the number of subscribm is already taken into account P; rr 7 i~tir ?5 I n 32 x ❑ MEMO= • 0 ~a.bara 1 ' j . 1 Mr. Richard Foster May 8. 1498 Page 5 C'2 noted two errors in Marcus' proposed computation on Worksheet 5 for the movement of WTBS from basic service to Tier 2 service as of June I, 1998. First, the Company computed a residual component (Worksheet 4) that did not take into account the removal " of the channel as of the first day of the projected period. More specifically, the Company computed the projected per channel residual cost for basic service as if WTBS will remain on the basic service tier for six months of the projected period. This is clearly incorrect. Second, the Company computed the adjustment for the basic service tier on Worksheet 5 using the computation that should be employed for the Tier 2 adjustment (See example above) The results of correcting for each of these errors essentially offset one another, with a de minimuc impact on the rate' SUNI IIARV OF RECOWMENDATIONS Based on the above findings, C2 recommends the following adjustments he considered by the City in determining the maximum permitted monthly basic service rate: 1. The City should consider adjusting the true-up of programming costs to reflect only known costs. 2. The City should consider disallowing the proposed increase in per subscriber copyright fees for the projected period. 3, The City should consider correcting the adjustment on Worksheet S to reflect the date of movement of WTBS and computation of residual impact based on the Form 1240 formulae 4. The City should consider ordering a maximum permitted basic service rate of 5942 as compared to the Company's proposed $9.45. Additional Issues and Recom mendstions C2 notes that Marcus has not included any information related to the Tier 2 service.6 As you recall, these rates are regulated by the FCC, but only in the event that a complaint is f led by the franchising authority. Pursuant to FCC regulations, a complaint can be tiled by the franchising authority upon receipt of multiple (more than one) complaints by subscribers within ninety (9o) days of the date the rate increase becomes effective. 1 C2 strongly recommends that the City file the appropriate complaint this year upon receipt of the required subscriber complaints. As regulation of the Tier 2 rates is „ scheduled to "sunset" in March, 1999, a final review by the FCC should be conducted. • The adjustment to Worksheet 4 residual component his a downward impact on the rate, and the adjustment for Marcus computation of Worksheet 5 at if it were for the Tier 2 computation his an offsetting increase to the basic service rue s C2 submitted requests for information related to Tier 2 senicca to which the Company responded that such information was not required by the tool franchising authority for purposes of regulation ~ g c 32XIO r I Mr. Richard Foster May 8, 1998 Page 6 C2 greatly appreciates having this opportunity to work with the City of Denton. If you have any questions regarding this report, the project activities, or any of the rccommendat ons, please contact Ms. Connie Cannady at (972) 726.7216. Very truly yours, of lily U ' Va.~ t'd" xc . C2 Consulting Services, Inc. e F f 1 ,1 r 1 4 5 % x, , 9 s T r~, 25 ❑ F 32 x 0 e 0 • > o I h.d r11o^.0 p,1--I DENTON HFADFAID hrln rr,, nr rl,m Mil rml n nhnn„n l. ' 4 1. st" of Red lam Fa ma of I'CC F om 1110 (esler n's' a tee epprapriefe nos) r I1 1n dIla III F(CFrm 1l l Obern pre, arras>fded vtrN EC C! 113x. mint the Liar orda a.vlmCeatfieha termlddylo l rl IN i b)I m on F(. I ima 1710 be en III t - Iy Ide d m It to Irsnchasdl SLOIlAd) l It In eat" the Idle uF Lire mM At c AN ldbrt Immldry'y) 1 Stan al FCC FnM 1210 FJ og Joel 1110 'i a the epprlrynae bad) its 1n A I l a Ner l (C I'm 1200 been preI ) i t • d m dh the F (1 + It, ne. III doelied ~ I..I yyl b f i s do F(C Fam I t006een pn, bhul) lied. eh Ire F tmewh a ng 4Nhr dm ! ' If F ee. enmr the dste fLiedl 1 (mn!'AVYYI 10 Coble Progropaing genie"CompleMlutrtefcsern'e' mlhe spproprias bor) ~ 1l. . It IsAlh: lom beeµ Ned n rnparse. Wn FCC Fine 129 eosplsM' I I _ _ _ _ _ J If)n. eldet Ole dWe of Orecemple M'.~ {mmldy)y) t--I I A it Ii ICC ram 1105 Being Iterlsded With ifiel0ong i it Selectios ol'Goisg Fonerd' C►rsel Addgws Methodology (eNU n'a' title epproome bas) =0o''l here 1 yew re una the origerd Wee NARKI P ME 1 Fi0D1 O(. heel here 1 y nu We una tk net. 41A MI nl n IC iIS M F 1 N14 1 Il arrA the C %I S -ill- 111( 1tI holy,, ale Lied to n, se recol cq Ire 111 10 ch,uuleh rr2ded durng the period Sley 15. @41 Iu Ue e 31 19411 11. Ile sdced Uplr+ds Methodology 'An;/ O're""'i ndrnk<'xurm.rrvv:Aerprrb'ern urdngy+wemr rA„noq, wxJr'wd.n.yiiq'ev.n BVeel~Ir ee rlw •lnbk E-I heck let I) ou ere a ryud J) rd ,s Ji s),l ea a ey( Lire mednlned heedrnd rq and lr s e lhrdrdaly Put I: Pretiminuy Information Module A: Maximum Permitted Rare From Previous Filing e k s e l I nt I IN ntteanm Muk owes tat l _ 11" e twe l 4 r It, In r h,mwn Ilk III w it, 10441 1, a.n Module 11: Subunbership ~Air -t e 1 I rr I rr Aerrl rw Muk I kt 1 rkt 1 im 1 Mr I Ir Aarl,t hhrrrlvnhlp'.0 snit l p 11rnd l Ie,~:1 4J 1nye lour Mwnfilplr lndl plbody 1e I'd nr IY@uNJ dvr pe ldw nlniryl~r il,rln kJ ryru.l ',dM• Module Ce lienslion InlarmNloB ~ I I ~I it th rrl be r r I I I Inmea lrJlwkm npnnd lee,Alld Film 111, In'ln 1 n" 1 2 I III ldlpmn l 11JI11 N lh).rda Ib,r,ralnV 4i ewt lrrmplner Intl 4 Id'pnmiwl,el dlnat pl'erndtM'L 1 'I re nilprro l inn l.•1rwl p Ill vh ll 1~ e. mere lit lnPp„"'slily Module D: CldeulalIII the Base Ride A T e 1 IIr 11r beterl rr btk flit tltll 1w1 iw1 rmuMllul,rxrl Cer.k Ve,mra a1 i110 O n l l wrem l na n d %'A.$ W Mlae ' Ill A midi tp, 11r 0eI1'ro sn"r u1 I. .110141 '•elhrd 4,mea y' "A t' Y l".Ihdn«IAI.-• raem tol lkkmm 44mta pikell IR ~maa rv l pkieka y11111 1111 Ill in pS, 1 IN lnap l etc 111 A 1, nv Ivl. lam 10 r 1 32x0 0 i _ 1 ~ ' , 4 it 31 tm 1 i 0 i. ' 9VAeYFa7 . .r 1 o~ m,d •m mww+,m l , mm,a * DENTON HEADENp +p xm•4J h1 D,ro 11 uw1 Nnh,Mbm llJi!4 i II' IxnM Mn,dl4eyiwm 1n JI.W 10,1!01 D, 14vpm IA' DI DI D11)4 W M D1 Part 11: True-Up Period Ma "ale Er Timing Iolormalioo I; MT.Ip,d lnalphlYlry l4d,xneJ'IAamm'I','J'n1'T. hn U.Inclmufd 4Mvrµuuy ArMv pp+.l II'I',y,o Vsdu41. If 9'.unuYLNYJ. a'Y, wpru YJ. EI, F.1, ud El. ~ t f.. 1 tinm4r d 1LInIM ip IM lru l p l4n,J 1 11 \umhr,l Nr l6n Ea•ue LMrMA Ira I IN Maul I Dd tim Nd 10 LS mu. 11I.M nod MN 11 \umMr d \I,imh, s l w, l p itndl 3 1 dylhll td ImpnY I f \umlm J \Lnnhr 1rw p Mnd 1 nphY Lx MnY LEE] Module F: Maximum Permitled Rule FarTruc U Period 1 r--- 1 It d 4 LI I of INK 1uM Tlu 7 Thl 1 Thai 4 rk" r I. v, SWNd Lyman I'd I rw l p hn,d I Iw 1, I In wr 11 \Irlup,I,ILd Mpmeu l d rrA l p VW 1 IN1111 LIUYU ' 11 Ahe 11,nMf!MWp 4ylpc1lid lour l'J M1n.d IIMtr 451 Inv 14 11w IpM1nLd 10w l U&lb* I d l4Adun 1 UI. F I- I J.F 11 W1" .r'~ I S tdtd~m A,ymeol ld 1. l'p N A.1I 1,T4%SI If1 ~'A91 IY It..4NI PV h Lyn.u la Ira l IN Rid 111141 1 N I mod lnW LSrr■ IM l.I pMINI IIM'1,'l pl 4lnJ ~4 14 lw C P MJ,wm l d ind l'p ltn,d i 41'10 F 19 Aln Mm V" N. I w I P M1nud l 114.11.1MFh 141 V,gSe Module 61 Maximum Permilled Rate For Trxe-U Period 2 I W awl p1 WM rW ! Th.I Td11 Yr,. 01 1 ~y, 11nh,d Lpmrm hx I rw I p M1rxd I I%1111 a1 Y.kq 4lalid Mpn.. Flx I" t p M1n.d 1I WAN 11 0 the M,m D kl.4rrwm I,, lru I IN M1nd JINIA1451 04 It N4 A l he 11e0i1N, is ld4,m D4•H •G1.6h Lt LI tdlnml Lymea Lx Ino l p M1rIW ll lw't-4101 , lA II,.kWt Npa* Lyn.m I,, 1n I pM1ru,I JIM'1, 41 L' Iwmdt mi, Lrwd ld 1,, 1 p Ynlud J1141, 11 'r 64 Ira 1 p Lynr li I It I nA I V M1nd l , ,,u 4Iu M1rn rr4III imo I p N iw'~!•~•Lt•ul I i I ` m ` r i 1 I T , a' 1 rcr rd. u4D , ~ . pwl Mrlo•II e.lllna„p 7J)IVr i I 11 ~ rl'ri r j X ~ ~ 2 `ca 1 `32 r T J r r r i -,RJrAtsto 'I r I I.J.,rl r'.,xmw„nxv 'a.xlwn DENTON HEADEND \pyoau A. nllk Aa,Ie+f 1 Module H: True U Ad'uxtmcnt Calculation a e d I. 1 W rJ+rri auk rill 1 iYr 1 Twill 1'Y. ! Ad'wrrret }w True tip hew I III Mn.nu 1 r m p.nul I 41,eb 1,!x! Il II! kn.nu I n,m tln h.mn.J k.Y I6 Anad l n! r.TAr.r~r II1 rnwl p hn.d l mluxm.rll171111 'P1.w 1lRa r• IH W.nN m hn.rll AJlwm.r 14\"6101' I i Ad'wtlreN Fu Trwa Up I'll 3 In l+wntl Hf P.,,. F..,m hrxrl7 H,1,1,4 HL R.•an¢I•am\4. how p" Ix I'll J R4AY Im lwnM 1 II1 hnrlJ AJluwrmn I14ibY r•i, i.w.. IR.'tfl 9r tmmtl on hmd I AJluwm.r 4%, Alm ,il, lm famur.l Hn k.~uu lri.b hrxrl Jlrl4bY lur 11011114 II In Mn rar PYUm N.. Ilan In. 1.+ hrxd J f61yILY rm imon% I I I I IAnnJ J Adlildm 6lrlKlhY Pm IIII IH 11441 r low Trw U Ad auerr i r 11,7 R..IUw Rem.wlq lrv l'p Adnaewb Hlt Imd lruIpA,q u.rmerll NHb N'•Ih IIILH1 t1 d•3.1A W.)))) ~Y 1114 Imam.d lrullpL4mJI+ILr AnMhd M1nnd 4t 3110 tb'r INS k.m.mm{tnv lpAJluumm Pll }H:11 YI9UU ~ 1 Put III: Projected Period Module It New Maximum Pemieed Rale 4 TW b. rr ea Kuk T.er! TYr f rW l Trr! rt l+pf fllrFud A.pn. rrrm Aupxfld M1n~d Nt+71 q \Irfap N.IMxI N{m.m I6 fhupwW Rrxd JNL f a111Yr II tine N.bm r1.YN A.rm.b t& Ral..NJ hold IN'Jx ASI NI Vv I/ Rul M1rxd Rtl.I LprhY ful NlnxnlJ+•i14!•I V17-0II EAV0 15 IoVtlnr A.pm+r la ilq.W Ill lnPlfl lAi 9.1141 , lb II. Arl I ppKk-41m 0 to MolaW M1.xd l%A, bI I• I.ImA("n. f.pram F'm",ad Mud 14 ' Er' I 41. IAq I. fn+Iq w{mrMRnprYJ fdxrl ,91 mb11 to \lu M1rrmnnlRd In Riryu NJ pm.d ll•H•Ib.P•Ir l+IIA7 Ilu I1launrelnrJRA Fu A.ryr'ar'Yrtd NU TYr/hn.IrwNl,.v6u.V.IrM~jvn'dawNr rk•..rarrrrM.rlLAd!.,Ip6w~MrA. Orrwlnrprbrvl AntlnlMlldrtlraa.arn.rivMa'dr M.9'wYArr'A.a.Jrm'Lrl . rrA tll hYRAYrFliI liYl rrlt'NM1VA 6411 q+dNmA.IM/+1rp6>..AV//wtlArdw Y.tl lb lrMrMI/tl6 il,.iYl i'YRNM 1 canrlerta 9u{aw 'A 11 trlL FAt SE STA T F ME 6411111 ON THIS FORM ARE PUNISHABLE BI' FINE ANTNVR IMPR1fONMENT ! It S CODE TITLE It SECTION 101111 ANDAJRFORFEtTVRE WS. CODE UTLEV SECtIONS011. S IA/Ianik r time ` ' tree End TdedPenbn Corpllllpa lTfY FbI,• 1 ' 1 I. T ele'phrRle mober to Ill e. l~ t c„ I Ht F"1141 pips/ V, f"41 l linl itmm~ JY1. 19% . 12 a YY x { A 5 10 $2 x t1r 'rT '9r ~ ~,`I ;r 1 6• tr1 1 i I i i '.tl111471 , e ' 1 4 1 . . Federal Commisixal ComnicilM Approved By OMB 1060.061! j p. P rll, DC 10711 ( . t s Worksheet I • True-Up Period Inflation tr f,x mina xin.. err 4ryr^xln Aid 1mIn61an, I ix I lC form 12Y- 1 r I Yw I'll Ilk It til xAr kC` . 1 I e rol M~n1AI IJI'. r I c 1 Ian hlxnh 1 JJ'. VA Maxh 2 1 11'• I In1 hInIA 1 14P. Ian A4mh6 111'. NI! MrnIA! IJI•. In6 S lh6 IJI". r ! 11u Mnth V I J.Y. Ihl M~nih In III h4xnh II j 111 Mnlh 11 III A`n.ye inllrlan lrhx lie irVedlp Itllu7 hxdI 1l1 Mi nlh I I ' 111 M(n1h H 116 All 11 1 !11 M(nIh Ih 116 Month 17 IIV M(.rth 16 IN Mmil, IQ I"I Mrn1A 2tl 1. , 121 46n1h 71 GI MmIA 22 124 MImth 1% i r 121 MI 14 Mergr InMt'xm Frhx lix 116 tu lip 19Md7 r I ' • f ' 1 f 1 i ~ ! 1 a r p ^'.I I ~ I (x 0. I ` ( Y 1 rl FCC rom 1.140 Pagel Mktmq)h F6ce1114'rnh~n Jlly'191{ r Iz A 1 „r. 13 I I2 rl. A'/~{"^~^ ?2~pr il'- r 1 ! 1 1! 1.J x 4.1 I , ,1 a 32 „ ~ I l I FeJnrJ Cnnnmlrawn Comae]1(M 4pproc ed R)9518308006iS 1h'nhrlatun. [M rOS41 I! Worksheet 3 . Nbrkup Method True-Up Period. Basic Tier I m in.l ni.un r .ra arr%mji~ l '1 11141RKNTN t i n it C F m l2P lmo-l'p I'rrxJ I'n,n~.lr+J PrnrJ I tpir.hw 1 LJ .urr lhr hrrJl rwh.h lh.u A.I ut rhmp n.uJ J11a'C'm llk aprhprWb h'r 'I *m 1 m ! 1 W.u l+ 1h+ rl P, w h.h Whir n rA.hr I . !vmt ncl III or In fie IMmpliolr Na I C3aic liar Tmll Ierl Tier$ I Alaaw 11 l 11, i~ it I. ;w I, n.J mmImthr. I,x whl.h talcr urc Amy kl wnh Ihr• w.rl fiurl' i hrrro,ml lSw loot +Ihe.ru'nJp'J mmrmlhr linwbrh role urr Aint w9 wnh lMr wmA.hra' f s1mof Mt1om lom d Ce1Tlt Aw"t Pu Cleemol Chommou tow cowidtire 10114t Peod Relolted Clmmeb Rslelted Cleoel CMmsels Adjosbet Added AdjeoLee6 Adjosil l lot fttAiuu MonQr 11.12 W2 Mmill I 60 11 N,S ell No 111 1.12 101 M',+ahr 11 6• f1.1 11,11 IIN 11.12 MA Muhth 1 61 6. 611 1.11 111 132 301 !Slash/ 61 61 611 1.11 I.N q iris MmlthI 61 61 611 1.11 1.11 Q le~ Murrh6 61 61 61.1 1111 LU loll lol mommr 61 11 f1.1 11 ILN U1 101 Nlxdll 61 62 11.1 11 110 M1t@11 6r 62 ill LIl 11.N 1112 II Mmlh la t1r M+mth 11 m"I'm 12 L4 Are s Pert a S Melt Method Adjeft eii .IIN IIi Mlmtll if Ile \1rotA II 311 Mmllh 11 I r III Mmnh 16 30 Mrn101 II Ira Mrmth If Ill Mrmth 11 rr Mrnl h 29 I f la M~~nrl 124 M.,14 a IN M.mlh Il li Ire Mlmth rl !r Are 1 1141,101 Meted Ad et 7 r FCC Fom 1240 I • Fqt 4 M'Ialo oA Feld 10 Vemim Air I1% !4 r MUEZ i tr. 7ti~a 32XIa f Y r r.1 r i . i l I. y lv 9 y~: 1`i I ~ . + I ~1. iP hbi 0 i . ' Y• r III ' Federal Coeewelnicrilm Cosm ion .Appmsed By /30600611 Ik shinflon, DC 2091 y r Worksheet 3 • Mrrkup Method Projected Period, Basic Tier Hv mrlnlwaM+ site Aryw,ldn AM INWI,m Fm V'CC Fnm IJJO Tmo Up Mmd Pmpld R+Ilvl i ; Y I WcutxmI now, IM ri lie+hmh In, .,,W.1 n iuwJ iNI m'X' m the eMoplule W,1 Ilue.lum 7 {ndvule the Ikl ++hreA ihi. t ivWrcet"hml wed I N1 we "S m Ile wppmplnb hn 1 sw TIee3 wr m Tier ".i 1 I law Ivry Is to lihl p,'rnd. n nit mlhs.I mK. h O rule, writ hemp III MIA K, +mt,Si It I)Ui 1 l lo* Amp %th wii pem-0. in mornA+ Im i nits ue h'mp wl w nA Am %w Yhed" • J , I.i•1 1'i I~dM•Im 111411111144 CW"si A•wd rwCkd" C6•r6Y told Cathie. Ragoili CMr6b Roaddd ChOW Chareb At)n11d A"" A4*w"d Ad)wtmol r ,a 101 Rev wea MlmJA (LIf r A I , 10f %1001 1111 U 61 61.1 11 1 .If JO) Madl7 63 61 67.1 .86 1 .N .17 _ J01 Monty 1 Il 61 63. .11 0 N .11 J01 riiiA IJ 61 631 1.11 1 IN .11 .101 Month1 63 61 63.1 1.11 1 N L17 107 M001 Ol 61 67.1 1.11 1 .M 1.11 J01 Madl1 61 63 •7.1 .11 1 .N 1.13 301 Pi 61 1J 13.1 1.11 0 .N .11 U U IJ.1 .It 0 .N lU > II 110 Mod61, 311 Muldl U U 17.1 1.11 1 N .1f s 1 Mfg II U 61 61.1 •I 0 .N 1111,13 111 Mrxdl lJ U 11 631 .11 0 N .II 111 An a Pub1 1 MI111 McAe1 A 6d r 1 I rdA I, o, fCCFIr•Il}I/ fye1 MkenoRtied AIvla n lust fool a r 10 25 32x' ~r p % 0 + , r r , k r Fedcrd C rmewrrM iert Cco om inn A4gruv td By OMB 306HOS " H':he41me DC 20531 I Worksheet 4 • Residual True-Up Period I r,r melro twm,..n Arm d • A a; lnvlnxtxne Fu 4 4: F'" 1240 1 QA 1 .m i Indxae the r~O 1, xhxh N, ~nAAM n Anne U.A IN m'%' m 11x' el•Durrnek An I Prue3!D D.'nrd IhMevl.d Drrwxl S: f / f 11/1 life Cimetwift Smic Tin I Tier 1 Tin 4 TMtI Ih POW ON 40t M etMe Pelotied Chop ft11M l 402 Aver" Ftlemd Cap so 4113 ' 403 AvelMe uW Pn ChenelA pmem 1 1 w rr C.hanelt Added Ct L Method r ~ 404 Averge TierhsOu/{101'4021011 401 Averge Choneh pa Recd Mel To "S000 404 Av uqo Cop Method Chafleh pn Tier Oo0oo Of Averge Remeniu !'hooch l/AlJ011 N.AIM 404 Av 01% - hrxd t To Chanel Re 1" 1101140!1 Pniod too 409 A, ergs Pus tied C hole 4lo MArgl E Memd Cots Averge Told Per CbwMA psuerls I4M4 t* t r', ell Chmeh Added (hi C Method 412 Averge tw Pmdud (409.1 t0 4111 • r W A=erMe Chmnehpet ReldMed ter 4t4 Averge C pl Method('homeh per Tier , 411 4%""1Arn ming(hoceh1411.414 Ui M mde Period I Per (hoed Rs4Ard (410111 S o , r` li 1 r t 1 r•r r'~ r,r ; Mill I r •w. FCC Fm S10 P0141 Mimi OR Itrd40 onion AfttS% 16 F. rK ri5~r_ 7 X C 32X d • r ',T I l v r r ~ '.I rr v~6r r•-- e ~ , r j I 1 , . f ~ h f I Fe" ComawKsim Car a inn I ~ AppruveJ By OM8 30600010 N'rAin4ron, CK 7051 j ~ 1 ~ Worksheet 4 • Residual Projected Period • ' `I IlwWue I Inhvale the pnwd hr v.hch Ihi. ~,riiheel 1. finny uved I Ml a'X' w,he eppnInale N, l TnI,4 fp Pond p"IMIAt PorvvJ r ~ C r Lbw Lir Ducr*m Bak Tina T661 fia4 Tor! 14664 ON 101 Avrrgr pm /led Chrye tSl111/ 101 Averge Erlemrl Cu! $0,311 I 103 Averge Towl PnCNmr Adjshenr KI A a t Chrtwb Addedtl6' C Medved 404 Avnge tin RriAId JIOh1011031 N.SIt• i 40S Avngr Chnrw6pn RerylrledTw 110000 5 101 AvrrKefrp Medved Chrlwbpr Tin , 40 Avetge RrrehlyCMrlrl4m'00t1 14.Ma r 401 Averge heiod I Per CWMW Rd iAW 140/71077 N.1NeA { I r I ,f r' ~ 4 I Ptl f r1 f I ICI u ~ I "i ^y f FCC Far IN$ 1'v411 MintudlE reel101'rnve0 WY HN 71 c - `~I,~ 1 x ICl a 32 xIC I r 4 ~ a I~ , rra R !a Y aqi . .a' ~ Yy 4 f + e,l n r { I r < e I1 4,. 1 , . l., I~ • f 1+ I t f • f r O 1 ~ M, x ~ I 1 ~ ~r r , f 4derd C"Mw irela,n Cole nips 4ppnn ed By OMB 1060'063 'A ahutltue, K MS 14 { f d t A Worksheet .9 - Channel Movement and Deletion k Projected Period, Bask Tier f Y. ha mono alas +n Apltmdn A nl InJMlxate I,w rCC 1111m 12411 ra 1•Ledxa+ I irJuak tM (1rYJ Isla ehi.h IM. eaxl.h[arl n Miry ucd i iyt m'M' xl IM aplmrpnrk hit I ~ 7: fmrl''p ran,+J f'nlletlyd Nmd I r lhr lkl 44 w%.h ftf YlrV1 Am H?: YY'd NI O'y'NtMI I rk hlN) ~ ' INC+IIM] III:INY1 OK Ier I!r 1 RI i N" 5 ' I ,Ne+Ixn 111, halt' n Iha 0rvl rtN J. n rnmlha, fw chch nle. Ha kotg to cah Ihaa c.vh.Mo 11 r + I,ue+hln 4 I Ir.l hnl n IM aw`rd p1.nJ m mmllla, fir •hch "10 In Mm/ ti %0 IM. %In 0"1 t, 7r Paerhld RrldW o1cho da ulod Rridnd OIC&MMIS Moved Ile! Pwcbyrd CM Add Rawl tCaftyla 1 Cop=m Cradyna NN PerC\earel r I M • j Frey bw (Ilddadl la Tiw ft Cat' A40 MOM 501 riow PerWd is 4401 5 50! Mmd f 3.1%h Fm M,mlh 1 !0 000 1 Mul0a1 !0300 Month 4 3 mu 1.300 Marla 0 0 DIM .1111 will" , W9 MuntllI so DIM 3.0000 .0111 1%1 + SIO MM61 0300 Illow 'No I.tIN ~ 1 , .131 ' ill Munh6r l0 100000 30000 14 M S11 M~Ia0111 00000 0000 .1111 .HN SIJ M'md117 31001 0000 IIII .1100 ~r • 'i s -7 5ll Ar a Pufod 1 CIrW Mareyey yid Daletke Ad eN I as '1. I YI II I 1 a a~3'jY ° ~ fr I ' FCC Pan 1110 F'p11 MirnsnA Pero 405'anina 11/110% I tf• I4 '~I I` 18 I tl ,I 11 1 a 1 I, r• ` I I r ~N i I I n t M F.d,d(nmmnn. rlu..( rm1m+.M Apprm.J P. 011111, r W3 M "IIIII .IK JI Work+beet 7 - Euernal Costs True-Up Period IM WnWUS. wr %,It n 1.4ln Iit,.. F. 1('r Vm ONO rw.I pPmud I'nl.drk P.lt l.hlntuml 1,..h"I . ya.d r. ..r f II1, k`+I N. r"Ii II'd.n'\' nllw gp.pntl. Ml ILw"I.S rW L Ammon II. hIA •r. r. Irin/.d. uk III MAAW ~ 7 r l,n.e,w 1 1 hw 1im( . r....,d pined . m..Nh.. rn +h1.N 11. r~ N..4 a .tilt D... Ad,..1 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMr IL. 0,00IMn RI TYe1 rh-J TW4 rlwl { f NbflY Call r.11AIN %fork" o 'r i'ul nl fMnprnn~p lk- 1'hrnnk WI Pna 1.111 W ,w +111 MO 1 11 n, 11111114A,p VOW I u Fmd $41 DIN V ' 1~; Nel.r.nn..n ll.aglr ku P.rv.d Yl ni r !nt ngltllk L.. L.1Pmid L'!.IpaN m( 1' A..+.I I IM,. I' I"NI.1a1 V.%IAp 1M, 21: 10 fN k nW Cab Elul[ Fthok r" Mark" +1M 1'.1,6 vpndr r... 1.. P.n,d YI IN M)? I ZN. Nd.wl rw.1.. F.nd Y' ql MIS r,trmir.M M.NI~~n F M Fa Fwd wDO +1N Odd Pd."w I1w It' P.nnd 0001 W!, !lu N>nINh.IMltW~mM FfkTd l'W. F1. 14..u11 Yr 1111$ 1 ~ ' [(M11u1CahC bk n at~Auj 1 t l l'nd ul lT~prmlm11 ~ 1T.r.rl (IIJW MI 111 w Vk. I I I U r anp \1Ay, %LOW I Ill Prlid +t: N.u.+rr.r.. 1'rA.ed lr /a R..d Al PIpn/„ F. F . Prod 111 I. Aill Ca► P'hpNk 1 u t 1•. %IAup !11 'tuAwl pTdrod l'u4 [(Irrnl Cab sw IflAir [.r Nmit6p In .'d+41pad4tw /u lMid ~ +I+ rl..k. Nnr.a~w. r,. rr.d 'I l I',.,.Il+or A.ryldarl h.- k v p.dd 1 +la I,,d F.krM t'uY P. Pw.d . , +;n 14MI . 4w.1d..eM f d."W rlro FU PI 1 f I ' *1 I it ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ • yf k r Ik , r PKl Fn 12C Py,1 Mirrukf Del IN('ruw Idr 14% s~ 19 l '.4As~..,1. 25 x 1 32x~~. li t ~ r It.. 1 ~ [ i f MAMA 0 ::rdr/1JI~1 4 i M1J.uI [.immunramu(m;mnunn 1p"".tI7 Ile IIWI~b € M.,Avyron 1A M4 f Worksheet 7 - External Costs i Projected Period % ' lw inuvmswFppwJl+.l dlnmWliis FU AT nn I:MI ~ f Tft4 pPOkd JInJViM NrM1b i,ti.i~m l !w .fi.A nmo pa4d n Irv Athn1 uJ 4n+,wlkm" IP¢ N'\' a Nr +M+W^ne I,n l t SA,.i>, n : Ilu. Air . Ar riml pm~.(• m~wA. lu wbidl tir n lsunr.n +~N IAY rwldvA' 11 fJwaumI I(.+Anl.[hM..1 pirvd•enlhi, M•bid ni.,n6.n1..1 onh Oot~wbA.a' I ' 1 Jnr I Inr D.MrIM aadr M 1 ri. J 1'M 1 M r r. c Mena Cwlr r O a W' Fil C,M d I*Yrnlninl lw!~aneh..Wld PnwWlIlWa III.:Ir:V Nwflf Wlmry\MM~NNI.d Fw Mid ' ?I! ra.iIIIII .l' w+ Iw l4nud Su dl P III 7vgfm F. fu Mud 10141 0 *11 rdnul rA rli hI. Fm F l+.%Wtv 5NIAr Jr EFIeFrnl Ca1h VW [IIdE4 hr Ma NA Al. l'Ipim.n. ra. ru Pb .d !I Ib N.7 1nimi 41uW C1u Pnd LOo •n1 7. 11 Zvt.un r N F u M.d 1n In NFl kul lA.m.I CMII F A P.rwd ra.Aar1.RJI 1 110 \hmlhl., N, IIIIII M F.netol CAW F. Md I 1-%111 7 r j i ~1 ~ r 1 rl R (Fun I J10 . "I !'prJ Wkr0lf.xrd /.O VniuF hdP lOh r r 20 t . 1 kz r ~~f Yj,, 25 x 10 32 x I O u I r ti) 1" t I I r t;r h I r . mrmrsAm Felon! Comm wx Bois Cr imm Approved By OMB 10604611 u',sh nsm DC )0116 Worksheet B - True-I'p Rate Charged j Ill mxlNodm, w Appendil AM Imiwhm Fn I LC Yuan 1240 ihle,Wnl i1.+hnpn Poe fnx-l'p Pvewd l,mmmthr^ ~ ' • ~.k inwxmn1 Hoh Imp n IAe 0nle-I'ip Pm42 . m m,"W j 1 1 e s Lime lip Dr BILL Tke) TkvI Tin4 Tke1 001 M1,4411 1 11 Who Sol Month) l1-1100 1 001 M•xtlh J !1.1100 106 Month 6 $9 no 001 Muth 1 111100 006 MoNhi (11100 101 Montle 1 !11100 101 MINh1 (13101 Sol Moth 1 (11100 ' Ik0 Month iO i 111 M"th 11 I r 6k) MO* I) 10 Perod I Averse Rre (1.1100 111 Month Ii ■ 111 MorAh II r 116 Mmeth 11 111 Muth 16 f t Y 111 Moth IF 1 114 Mufa 11 ' i 110 Month N " 111 MuNh )0 Y I ~ 6)1 Moro 11 oil M01,41 111 Y 121 Mond II 111 Month 21 I, 121 Period ) Ae "Me Rise ~e r r' s 1 ~ rl 1 I M °l 1 1' I't lY~~r ,eN I ei I PCC two 1241 r Pse 1 MKMIO hxu 6 01'MKV my l1% 21 y~,r erg i I ~ _ x ~~f.`" }[x s41 x ~ M K ` r41y~ e I ,32 X I e 30410006 l Exhibit 3 4 WNSULTING SERVICES, INC. 7801 Peeaoss (912) 726-7216 Dallas. Texas 75248 (972) 726.7216 (fax) Mav 15. 1998 Mr. Richard Foster Administrative Assistant City of Denton 215 List McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Sir. Foster: C2 Consulting Services, Inc, (C2") provides the following amende, iccer+mendation j concerning the Form 1240 filing submitted to the City of Denton ("City'') by Marcus Cable ("Marcus-' or the "Compan)") on or about February 27, 1998 As disr.,ssed in C2's original report dated May 8, 1998, C2 recommended that the City consider a maximum permitted basic service rate of 59.42 as compared to Marcus' proposed rate of 59.45. i his recommendation was based on the information provided by Marcus on April 7. 1998 On May 12, 1998, Marcus provided additional information stating that it had "left-out" a channel in its basic sen ice channel count for both the true-up period and the projected period (MINI IND), Based on convet,ations with a Marcus representative, this was an oversight in the preparation of the channel line-ups originally requested by C2 on March 23, 1998 r~ Becaase C2 adjusted the projected periw residual costs based on the originally reported channel count of 24 (instead of 25 channels as noted in the updated information), the • adjustment for the residual cost impact of the movement of W'rBS must be changed The origina! adjustments recommended to Worksheet 4 (residual costs) and Worksheet S j offset one another, with a de minimal impact on the rate, However, by changing the merage channel count during the projected period from 24 to 25 channels, the impact on the rate is an increase of approximately SO 01 & • Due to rounding, the computation of the maximum permitted basic service rate is now $9.44. a 50.01 reduction to the Company's proposed rate of $9 45, The discussion See C2 report dated Nay 8, 1998, pp 4.5 22 El 10 32 7: 1 • k 0 e , Mr. Richard Foster Slay 15, 1998 Page 2 provided in the May 8'h report still applies. Only the number of channels used in the adjustment to Worksheet 4 has changed, with the noted differences in results. If you have any questions regarding the change in C2's recomme,:dations, please feel free to contact Ms. Connie Cannady at(972)726-7216. Very truly yours, ! C2 Consulting Services, Inc. r~ 'Vy f I ~ III f t. i r 23 32X d ° e , 'IitNglaaa o 'crib?/ _ I • I.b+eii mm~,a~nn ',m~mia.e DENTON HFADFND May 15, 1998 sPp ^•ue~ rnnlawi~a>r! 1 StaN of Ae°ious Fiala of FCC Forgo 1210 (eatcr a "I' in the appropriate bog) SO e Hm m FCC Form 1210 been prt5 iota!) tied • eh the FCC? Ilya, rider die dale of the a,nt recem l9wa (mm3dd3yy) 1i1 Stl ' b lim a FCC F,ea 1210 ben pm "IF hied teh die Flaicheiia 4ohoril? t>a. emn the that of the awe mcnl Idling (moldd/l. y) 9. SIIta of FCC fan 1200 Ft ins (enter u'I' mthe appropriate bog) )t.S VI a Hm an FCC Fare 1200 been pm%wwly Ned aehd e FCC' if la elms die dote tied: (aaldd3 yl \IS V Is Ha ar FCC F ao 1200 beat pre, Klmly lied egh the Fmchairia Adhori) ' t yes. ere" the doe lded(W,Jfyr') 10. Cable Rugrra inn San ices Coapl aid Stable ("a Y'I' is &e appropriate bas) 1S ahtha'n* bena lYrd nrsDmse ton FCC Fao 129 coapiaen? ~ if y a. ercer tie dale A the c noplAm (aa3ddly3') 15 SO IF is FCC Forge 1205 Bears laclacied With ibis Fd3sa 12. Seleclica ol'Goia F"Wel' Changed Addeiev Medeodofot)• laaee w': is tba appropriate boa) =Clod here d y m re urinli"orKnO Ne IMAR%t P ME I HOL11 =C heci here d y,xi m mils tie new alremaa t of a (CAN M£ i HODI. Ilaagg dheCA1S ME FHOD. hoe you eteaedronnot mco.m l,v its Str charnels Added 3xW the penod May 15 1994W Der. 31, 1994' 12. Head•u6 Vpande Melaoddea2 •I(~') r/~.rr~n evp.rN~h~dr(inw.,mro Nrr. yrfrdeh e, ue on u~yr~a arA°FKyh nrnalnryulaurnb.nlJprf~ew.Alfih a Chef lk here f you m s quid!) ry coal gystm ury Ow weaaloed hedeM Ilp`rode meem iosy Pars I: Preliminary Information Module A: Maximum Permitted Rate From Previous Filiay a t a a 1 it 1.1.1 Dr rrnxlioa Me. T. ! r.r 1 1. 4 Lr 1 n' (srof \Gam~o ltinMW gNr W N'.9 Module B: Subscrlbershi e a . a a I it Nscti 'm au. Fa, 1 Few; r.r a tier 1 q'. 4 04. wh., nlenLp 3 m fro Pp Nr 1 15'i II! b:rgr bhrniwnlry l a 1ma Cp hmd 2 L°d'a i fli I pmfaed A,ete Wb,,Map fa 11ep,W Met Module Ci Inflation Information ' air I W Oevn i a. rtrcJ f alln ep rip i as e x M Lg H m I lul Yo al lull 2 I n le mN leneam l mp llmd Oprr w. lteep,wog w Sal mmp4W 1 91r. r IM!n~rolrl•e Fl I tp Pmrd 11 kb t fain"a Lac {a lra t pAmdll'Alr •,1 lapel l(l 1.1111. 1.: I,. I nle I Module D: Calculatiab the Base Rate 11 • p ~ g a t I LLr I re bird m 41 r. j tine 1 I'w a two Ill ivn.Iha.Wtiyrd Mpoa nl yl uin 112 (,mI w,a(n.n Mlnen 41 rM" O • 01 (mrn(ap, \Wa~d lryhirm L~Ie A'. DI rirtrn lad+p \h~bd 4pnen R"2'" 1 I)f lwmnlren Ml Mr,rmmeml [kL1~r°erymr. y'rea. on amen lnaipSgmn 9'." ~ KL fan I:n pep! Mnin,n I ueU biv~a 1°h 19ie 24 ?5 32 I [aomau \ o r. t ) A r j i. sl n p •wb.,)\rE Ras w s y+rl ' •~~•~•~r'* M^* DENTON HEADEND May 15.1998 n.b np.w. I. ,..t 1 ' n~ [ilRlaldl..R \f111.W 1". /•W n1 nn RM ln: 011): D( M DI IID n'I $lsoR Part 11: True-Up Period Module E: Timis loformatioa if II Mfia f.p.l nrl p7\Ilmnt hdrtmeJ'In..wm 7'.'7'J'I' Sa urw,vw far Ssmpio.dlhy np.,l Y'I'. p Is NohY 1. !I'1', must EI .d f x Y't', au+a EJ, E1. El .d E7. I: \amrnlV.~mR. mlbe I v l PNIW I f hi \.nnler.l\L~mA, Irli.ani@r>vdI'JIP[VlA'..d:M rd J IN moo artm AM«Iw Mod 11 \umher d Nom A, m rnrl p Rn~': l l{b4 IJ lmen. V1 \uleMdNaIb1 frv Ip Nr lWq,bw Ial.Y q t mud Module F: Maximus Permitted Rate For Trwe-U Period I Liu xri r 6r 1 Tk. 1 TO, d T'r 1 If (w,mgw us.m to rw LP PedI 21 loon 1 I~ rl ll.iq 411M4 46.0 1J rru. l p P ld w't, 11 919({I I I P) cLa%t,mm WYm46mew ra 1m l'p?..d 1 J%'"VIl x1.01 II IN LF Fln. IRM F'.lglr Fa 1.11nia IDMt 141.111 NMF+ ✓ 1 1 Ii1A .%.IMW IJ Trv L F NI dI II WL1Ff11 1U.OItl P6 FN kd t'pv k4{mea Tm rr l'p?rAI lw'Ls 61 1101 It L.4+vICoR14/mr•ra rrad'p MaJ 11% L. 11 g4 Al I .1 p4{Ma FJ tN Iy F"'d1 >DO155 WRIRA ha krs Mw RM la Tru I FNw I lF M15.1 •F1441 Module C: Maximam Peroited Rate For True-Up Period 2 . a t d I.r Dmwigt" Bak rkr1 lw1 nmd TW1 I (p+\YlEd 4~mem>a I"I pj%n IIML II W 1lseup \k1130d 4trmra h. Tv t p {bud I IAll q I W (Le\ Abrv IpMN1(wL x91 - 1'. 1l M1n.~.'Rae I11.n1rFJ IdW.an1•r1•eLW$dt I LS Ipneiw 46vmlr lra lp Arvdlll(A'[4a1 Iledld lp6rwY 4{mam Fa l.v lp M1ndliwL 61 1 L1 Lsamd[ws 46mea 1J iralp M.d Jlwlr'1 ~ p4{rr.a iJ tort lpAr.wf2 Ln IrJ1 (A \h\" RMIJ 1N C ph,r dif(A-W-lbl.14A1 r i, t t , 1 i1 I T'r Kt 120 Rrp l V.raJ1I 6.1 / u 1e..w LA 1a1R r 1 25 j" 25 k i❑ 32X IO r " . . t 1,t l i~' r y r f I I: r a ~ t 1, 1 a t r I Animal . r 0 I n ;arauAUra ~ 1.{.al•:ranwndxra i'.nmu.iaw DENTON HEADEND May IS, 1998 Avpr~.wM nvD Re14W1! UWmdewla 1159 Module H: True-U Mixistmeat Calculation R a Jw LWa ae.7r t:.1 t.r3 r:rA rW5 A 'ul¢rr Fa True U Prod I 111 AnraA laue Prey!l MI -q 11 4 HJ Rr.raA hire S:u lL.emw Aue fa Pndl 1"A51,YN.a'r IU r. Lp Poal I Adlu9 ind(N111II ISIiA}1A71 IN Ion A" And I AJ,..W llJW IW'I AdjedoeM Fee True U P.iad E II! Rraw From Pmd 2 F'phNu{drad Ek Ile X,,,.f,a Star N. Rae is PWnd J I, hpibY I. Im,,2 III Pnod 2 Mlwued F epblr l a 1.0 l l lb 11:1 SI{I IFR Id.9 oe PWrd J WNOW15" aetetet¢ la l"10 IN P.,.. T. Prrd J Ir1~~bY (a lama N10 RAndA Fm¢MAe MaRv rv Pml71v1ribY is lSWrd 1111 PnadJAJjudmra lvYphY fa ldrn.1,lN:PIWI Tell real Up AdlvmsM - FI12 M.YW1, RrvwRq 1nA I) Adpmv¢ It {MHII•t1t1 p11.2»1AY, NIJ rdd Jae d'p AJjudva .01141111.1111 ISI l3A lebTr HIA Aan.11 1 p Chord F. r3¢ ftwd P¢1.4 III! IFem" trurl'p AAodord IN I VFI Al loan 1 PBrt III: Projected Period Module 1: New Maximum Permitted Hate Y e d r 1 1 T.ra To s awe TW 1 Lift INMAN" iW II CrP Mellod SgvaFa RopaW lMod 116111 b0Y10 12 Slreup %4(" LS¢r¢ Fd F1oI¢Wd Pnod 11611, it 71 (W 51.¢¢ Drh¢ Sr3aea F. P,p W Ma111,1 Y51 ia1 Y47) w Py.Tdbd Raft tI%,bY F a larm"{DSMF 545. II •I2•f51 1F.AFi1 1 15 rdlaaa Sepeea ra'I Prod 11111(11. I47 In lmt le Ihahd l"p3radt Silva FA Pol." III ivu el 11 I...4 (,q %q.0 F a N.,, W h.d 110171 111 10 2 a r" I p Seyv¢ F. Pop wd Paid 1ue11.P51J1 I9 SJ¢M¢(W ArY Fa PgerW M¢1111•IM1e•IS•F11 la Al71 IIO Open 5.1a10d Rr fa PoprW Prod 1atl r l' S'.r /Ie r1,wuadRrrr.Ad.rR rev" 4," Age w, Arrow v, NUdA16Yr.ar m. a,.e I,m Arvpe.YAa{t Jdv aWedl. r ra¢¢aaw a,."Ae/ArA:ftW .e, 0a7r rdddA i:W rr A,,rb.Nd..+i.SFpvWa W dr v/rduaA net/Ar/avhdtar arld,n W nes*sdrSov a',n rn,,,,v a !I I I i ceeAYeallaa SFrrRad - - NTt t FVt FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON TMS FOAM AAE PUNISIML E BY FINE ANDIOR IMPNSONMENt r" 7U.S.CODETrTLE 13, SECTION 1001b ANDJDRFORFEITILIl .a CODE,ITTLERI.SICM111 1. ' A IhIe ha M me aid Call je, ad bag army 1,}JIY. } IxrledFa r , 0 %we ad Tide of Pesm C mokill ffia Fan Telepbim "bw Fae N1mbr 14 iC( Pa¢ 12(0 pip Af<re1,ll l.ad Ap ve1,ne 111 1e# 26 ,R.r I - }11 y`r 2 1{10 32xIn ro r J~ / t n. f4 [ ~ I ~ S I, r S 1 4 n O I I f 1 ' Federal Caaewrtion couoan Aped By OMB 3061-0613 u'shiKtdt DC 20531 - Worksheet I -'True-Up Period Inflation Fu in.wrvow . ue Appad,r A of liw wlioru Fu FCC Fua 1240 - IY.e Palul LfC loArdm 6'~ I01 Mmth I 113. 102 Mirth 1 11Y. _ 103 Mush J 113•. 101 Mmh1 1A4 105 Mush 5 1.11•. 106 Mmth 6 1 lJ•. 107 M.nlh 1 113•. 101 Mush 1 l r IN Mmth 9 14J.. of r r, 110 Mmlh 10 III MmUll .,~i f -I Ill MmU 12 117 AvmYt InArln[ 3a~nr for 7n.eilp 13101 ' Paved I 2 11 Mush 11 I I5 Mmlb 11 r 116 Month 11 t7 %Wth 16 III Ma.eh 17 I I9 MuMi 11 120 W.411 19 121 Mmh 31) 111 MvIb 21 . 121 MmIA 21 121 Ma123 a 123 Mmlh 21 1M Awryr 6d41.m 7rclar fa 7nrt/p p.d2 i. 4 L~ 1 1 FCC Fam U44 I n.i Fhy13 My Oft Fttdl l Ymidl my 19% .'11 ~ J 27 t J. 10 - A". ~w~ k,!; 4I ' 1 ? 5 X~ Q 32X 1 1 I Federd Covamw am ime Cowma im Approved Bf OMB J060-06/S N'mhoston. DC mu I Worksheet 3 - Markup Method True-Up Period, Basic Tier V'a marucewlnw we Apprndie A4 Lmmu far fCC Farm 1240 I T.-Up Porn) Ptalatad p4hJ 4Awo ore ! Awlwelc Ik p+uJ lur whwh Ihu w(elwAcel a king wrJ (PoI N'X" N IAe ePM.Nriek A. 1 \ . `1Ul'.Iwm 2 tndiIAIe Ik II[r {(M Mhtih IN% a Aih(411, I%111y uwd 1 Nr N ~X is the eppa 1111111\ fell I Box Tie: Twit Ter6 w (fwbll.>fl I I low lery .IM0h1 prrd. la mwA+. Wr wAwh htc, ue lrmy xe wn6 Ihn wad dlttl! 1 IJoe.h1Y14 11aw Mny iw the xu+.l peed, in Ime e'1+. hr wAwh gee.4h Feny xl wnA IAie w(v6,An7"~ L ice Period SIm of per for Sr at Co"St Avenue Pa COwd COeereetr told Cadr3ee ' e Resdeled C6rwh Resdd"CSuret COereh Adjwtmer Added Adjr6leel Adje,ded 101 fte.nu Molde ILIf 102 Mlvde l 60 61 0.5 0.1111 1 0.11 10.13 104 Morde2 /1. 61 61.0 0.01 1 11.0 SI.H - 304 Mmtle 1 61 61 61.1 .11 0 0.11 10.01 i AS Mardi4 it 61 61.111 0.11 f SL0 1113 J06 Moroi S 63 61 61.1 0.11 0 0.N 0.13 10t Mold4 it 61 61.1 11.11 0 11.11 0.03 - )01 more t 61 U 61.1 0.11 0 Sam 013 J09 Made 1 61 62 61.1 0.11 1 $I.O 0.0 410 MadA9 it 62 63.1 0.11 1 51.0 0.1f li III Mae010 412 M94 It + III MmeA It Ile Ace c Period I Mu top A4jrm4er LO%/ 1 IN Made 1J 116 Mont, LO 311 Motdl 11 1 I 111 Made U JH Mafil1 120 Made 11 321 Monti III , Jtl Morrie t0 12) Month 31 I J24 Month tt iI Its MOP0123 j 126 M1,111111 24 127 Arch a Period 3 C MelAod Ad' M r r ~ 0 ~ l FCC farm 1710 Pye I MimnrA F4rrt 4 A 1'wwi•+r I'd3 19% 28 32XIO e 1 ~ 0,, v 1 f . 1 Federal CoulwwvK Cau eiun Approved BF OM830/0.OW5 Wshst ION DC 20556 ' Worksheet 3 • Markup Method Projected Period, Basic Tier Fur YulrYelxnd, der Appeedid A d m,aw. F,e FCC 1" 1210 Tnw-Up F.I.J 1hq.IW Pdrtud lAwdbm I Wi,,W the period (w which tb,, wwt,bw o buoy adds IFUt M'X' we ".pp"W bid I Q^i,d, 2 lnliune the uer (w d hich lh,. wurkdhen to beiiy umd Iltir n'X' n the a,yetyri.re hod l Bew Tier! Twirl WA Tier ' tluettee 3 II.. k.y a lM(a p-mad. ram lh,, lidwhwh wainen bent' del ..Lb Ihn • wi A.( 12 , (Xnldn a Hu* kdq n N reeed petwd. ■ mdeeh,, kw whwh min old be46 del wrth 1114 wwktkM . I b~dPr/tr6ele fr11Cars" Ar6np PrCbemd Cr1/U TOM CosisIIaive r Use Penal NepllYd CYa1611 NgaMd C1ovi1/l Clowo6Y AdOMW Milled Adj,dly40 "*"at 101 Revow MaA 11.1) l + ~ 301 Mwld,I 67 is 67,! N.11 0 IN N.tl t 303 Mwdl 1 6) 67 67.1 N.11 1 i1.N N 17 101 Mu,dt1 63 13 67.1 88.11 1 N.111 N.13 )05 M01111114 63 63 63.1 1111 1 N.N 11.13 t - 306 Mand,I I3 I 1 63.1 11.11 1 N.6111 1.41 91 MwEi6 fl 63 631 "At 1 N.88 N.I7 101 Mwdt! II 13 611 $4.11 1 N.N 1L0 301 MtNh 1 63 63 f7.1 18.11 1 N.N N.11 330 MU"AI U N 61.1 N.II 1 N.N 11.11 "m 331 MrMt 10 13 63 11.1 N.II 1 so" 313 MwIA 11 N 61 171 88.1! 1 N.N N./7 313 Mwdl1I t3 U 13.1 .It 1 N.N N1I 711 Ar a FWW I Mot MntM A Fat .I7N r G , I< i 5 y fCC Poo 124 Pose I M woB lded / 1 Yeno,l N7 HM 29 Now 10 32X C f e lyi ~ n : 14®f4e Federal Coouwciimv C'. "mm" Apprm ed P7 OMB 1060-DLIS wah}rtlon DC MU i j e Worksheet 4 - Residual E Projected Period r yv~awnl Wvek the pen, d 0e w hwh ihie warLih, lit he.gt and IILt r'%'• dr enpegrule Loa) fr iip Pmw P,loo. Perxd i I t i e / Lie Lis DumpLioth BI mit Tier? Tier) Tinl Tierf Period Dee 401 Averge PeA/udcWte Se MD 402 Avant Feumd Cob W-U7 Av erete Told Per CAerd AdjutmerA did Sit #04 fm Chsmeb Added Lk' Copt Me" 404 Av erete Trier Midd 1401407.401! 15.51111 f e 405 Averete Chattels per Hetdeud Tw 71.1000 h':! 46 Av age C ep Method Chwrh Per T is 0.0000 401 Avant lia mitt Chemei!401.401! LA 1 ~ ~r 401 Averme hriod I Pro ChmW Flee." 1404140n f1%N r C 4 i J .q i 1 • ! y i 1 I r 'I fCC Forte 1740 peal l Mwdmut FIee141 Vast" IdT 10% J v 3P c ~,,s' 10 MOM i i. „ r { t V I• i.1 ' t , ~ d 1 , 0 .1' 1 1~, i n Federd Coaau,icaiaa Coaaasim Approved By OMB 30W0605 Wuhnaran DC 20551 1 i Worksheet 5 - Channel !Movement and Deletion Projected Period, Basic Tier f'a ndnK lKna. see Appcnla A of Inttrvniam Fn FCC Fan 1240 e I' (.41KtKmI Wwa,e,hr prnd fa rhKA this rakshM is hrn,l u,ed l Pu, a W n,hr appn4pm4 hoal rr I ' TnN Ip Paiod Pnyaad Pawl , C rI~juema 3 Ind,wle dle tier fa rAKh 16u rorkaAM n Ern uad IPU an W a Oa ale 6yif.l 1 1[C IV C IA~_--_ Ta (fnelne 3 Ilor to%n Ihr fm prmd. m na,lha Ar rhich,am+ N Ong a'I rill d,n rurkahrn^ 12 WevLrn I I" Mng n tha wand pmd, in nosh,. Or rhwA n,ea art knF ve, r N tl,u rakahre,' I i Ranbd of Cbmub Dii Raidod N Cbokub Mrd moo PrUrd Call Pa'cY~N ' r it PvioA Ffw Tta 1.46111010 Ties AlfalaeN K 1r,l~a 1 • CNe1u Ceaalatiaa NN Call A4=U" r r .v SDI Pttr Peaiod '1 502 Ma1,1 11.3py lO.NN M/N r' wry; 50) Me*3 so ow "we p.NN M.3N2 ' Sop MO* 3 now 10.100E NJIIE ml) ~ SOS Mo,d,1 (0.0000 10.1000 MIEN my) r 'rJ 101 Moyh1 00.1001 "NOE 10-m!) 101 MaA, I NNW NNW S01 Ma11 / 10.1000 10100E MN .1N i 500 MaM I M OoEO 10.0000 p.MN .1Ni) 510 Mal,1 10.0101 IO.IOO/ q.II1E NaM MN .)N 511 Moot, to 101000 . So INS M.oooo MNN II.3N>7 512 Mold, 11 now U MaaO, Il So 0000 mom fE.E1N 111 Ar a Prid I Cral N"m ad ad Ddati110 Adpifted SEEN .1N 1 h. I 1 k ` tr FCC ion RA ' P11ge 1 Mi mool Fled 1.1 vmialt my Ift , a~'1sr r ~1 a„ ? xQ 32x17 ~ ! i r s 5 'y t. e r ~ it a I. I ,'t J I 1 . ~ 11 r , b 5 . , I F.,IwM C.m.a.WU C.m1w.a App..d b OAM JIILL0b5 %."W& Dc XW4 i h Worksbeet 7 - External Costs t True-Up Period +'Fq..uw0....r AppsrMAd0w4wfa iCC Far 12+1 ~ ~ Irr.L'p Prw1 N.1.Id Y,nd t LNwt..L F. rhbI pw.ml CIL%oM durwwkrbw^ IPM.'X' a Im Ppmp~ S..I 1 I kA"..l Hw 4wpae.1"W.A.vvna C. rfir_1.ren kwprrN tn. rwtde -1r l/...ia 1 llnr Ic•'M ~ A. od pv,.d a mNa r. rlrA w.. rr t•N w rN V. rg1M..7 1 Y,. 1, L3. W O.wA rr TMt n.i r1.1 11.1 e d E,& ICw4C Markg { 7u1 Cw dPnya.q F.19..6 MYeM1 WfIfMq HI,071 t1 ~ AOw f 11 W L'.4 %bA; \Ltd F. P..* i ' ~ • 'DI Can F. F. F.We ION r*a• A7 fupln/. f.r Tv Pr6d 1L,.17eH IpJ TN Fend C.YFIirIWFw/1•r\LYp W,E2W 709 \LYd L'1 Ea7mdCm WA11111f s• Ellanal Cwt. NOE kbr 1 F' 701 fb6lp.d.T. to P.Wt 16.00 5 r ~ 5 707 F..*. 1drd Cer F. P.d 1000 701 F. IrtA" F. T. Pw d !0 W r top Tdd Fmnd r" F. P.d 169.971 MV 710 Ngd17.IVfBrR.TMrrd Cr,Fq P►dl 101101 PeFW I ~ Il7emW Cnfl IWbk br Mark,* Cm rPnW."F.L".1i AWPngb 1 711 IfW. A11.1 1f w L,.1 Mry VLebe Fv Pw'r1 711 agl..lY.iv Coal fe Fw Pwd 713 C.ori}1 Tw Fr Nrd r r 711 Fa C.. 11.01c Fa l 9%m i • 1u u.fr lyT~rrrlcr. EtYnW c"U Nr L k rer mm AN , 116 V" 11p.d. Tr. F. P.vd i 717 Fr,." R&W Cwr F. Pv ,I1 C..ar.t R.CA" Fm F w Pe.4 h ' 710 TMd LMrnf r.a Fm Prd r 1'y \4.dlp,prlbwlOr Farrl C.n Fv FrWe1 f ~I . 1 4, !t1, ' k w ;T 1 PCC Fri 1110 r t ly l Nrrmdi 1 .1 4 A V,nw w! 19% : 1~ i t r ' 32 - ;}?.~~L1 25 x 32x 1, L 10 ;W, I i t 1 l r J i ~ r r Lx M1 1 , r ti\ n. r 'I P i I O 1 Y/ Ad's FnYtd Camurl~ion CwuFY4.. APPord H70Ml fbDMf M'nhq,m DC M54 t Worksheet 7 - External Costs Projected Period Fu amlWima. Appal. A d Lm .Fa FCC rur I'M T .A'P Pr6d Nwlra.l F.nuf pueWOn l.Fa wlclr~pwiodn )ov GIUS or d. ..!decal IPMn* •Ae Awovr laal f rhr.x21k.kryfm Pe*~dn m.0. fu-bl tisnl.ryM-tA u,. --iA' ' 13 P.wrf Ffo+Yy.Y.ietpwdusd. fur wbd rYn■ry.l wlq L. wu111w l i Iln tb Du.rlWa 0iif nf1 tit Mr Tlr1 [LknaCanL kfawf u Cm dPmsamr Fa CAmY A"W P,. W S 15 rlTj10.:/ AAu f I.w L.i.r MA, MAW FarF J ' 74 Iyyvy.ral raw Fr la ll.wl Su NI r r700 C.Wom Fr to Pwd i)1M100 fl Tw EmW Ca fl,,bh F. T Y. 4AV InAr." y`.,... 7u1 %UA1I V Fd WCm SNUI./0n Lrkfod Can NN E 40k for Tub C1AL lps & t. F. Nr so .00 107 FwaL. R4f.t Curia Paid rO W r NO Curve MrA" Fa rm Pubt 1000 - 709 T" EA." cw r. P" 710 %L Y, pw.30 ih EY wJ cu F. PledI rUU1 ,I 1 ~ I 1L• ~ ~ R I M I I FCC F" I)m Fw 1 1e...,. a~ 1.... 1,. J* )M 33 J n, f4 it 1 < ~ 1 ~ 10 4 .10f01pr ! ` . 0 ~ r FrdvW Couu mini Couvion Approved by OMS 310 11S Wahrytm Dr' M14 Worksheet 8 - True-Up Rate Charged ham.rNOl m me Appmdit Ad)UhW mFa FCC Fam 1240 ' p,rwm l Har, key n tha'lroeifp M1nd I, a Ilwlnhe' 9 iJ.Kdvn l 1 k,. kvy h the Tme :ip PemV I. a mmmd,,' I 0 t Liev Lin Da m Brie TivI Tier? Tiard Tiers WI Mora1 (1.1101 101 Mad 1 19.1100 Al Mad! 19.Wil 101 Mad! 11.1100 Its Made 19.1100 f0/ MaAI it no 101 moodI of sm e~ so/ AI11L,1 19"m Wr Madi0 "no I10 Mandl 10 f I I Mall 31 111 114906 11 11) Period I Avwgo Ate -01.1100 III Mad 11 119 Made 11 - 111 Mad 11 r I1! Mad 11 111 Mad 11 ILO Mad 1/ IN Mad 19 Ill Make A I 1 Ill Mad 7I Ill Mad!) ~y Ill Mad 1) W Mad 71 r 171 PerildlAeeytAte J, j J 1e •~'Mr r 1 FCC Fat I244 Page 1 Mieanll Feed l0 Vmion NT 19M ,A 1 34 I, tt . nra,awna , 0 i s Exhibit 4 INCINSULTING SERVICES, INC. I 7801 Pencross (972) 726-7216 4 Dallas, Texas 75248 (972) 726-7216 (tax) kt k f I Mas 15, 1998 Mr. Richard Foster Adrninis!ratiw Assistant City of Denton 215 fast McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 1 Dear Mr. Foster. I C2 Consulting Services, Inc, ("C2-) has completed the evaluation of the FCC Form 1205 filed by Marcus Cable ("Marcus" or the "Company") with the City of Denton, Texas ("City'") on or about February 27, 1998. This is Marcus' first year to file an "aggregated" tiling regarding its proposed increases in equipment monthly lease rates and installation and ma:ntenance charges Because it is, theoretically, an aggregation of costs of all Marcus cable system operations, franchising authorities that regulate Marcus' operations receise identical rate filings 1 As you recall, the Form 1205 is filed once each year, is based on the most recent fiscal year costs'data and is filed simultaneously with the Form 1240, The City has onginal jurisdiction with respect to the review and regulation of , charges resulting from the Form 1205 computations Thi, udy does not constitute an examination of the financial condition of Marcus or its parent company. As such, C2 cannot and does not express any position with regard to the accuracy or validity of the financial information provided by Marcus during the course of the analyses. 0 BACKGROUND In its 1998 Form 1205 filing, Marcus proposes significant increases in its maximum permitted Hourly Service Charge 11SC') for installation and maintenance activities, and in its monthly lease rates for the year June, 1998 through May, 1999. Although Marcus • has committed to "operator selected rates" for certain monthly equipment lease that Prior to this yeas, Ma*cus filed Form 1203s based on the costs'cquipment fur Mucus Cable Associates, LP In its :998 filing, Marcus included Marcus Cable Partners, LP, Marcus Cable of Delaware and vlarytard, LP, Marcus Cable of Alabama. LP, and Marcus Cable Associates, LP 35 ~ ~ DI s 25x10 32X L 0 I~ l , Mir Richard Fo,lcr \las {5.I!Ng Page 2 are lower than its proposed maximum permitted rates, in most instances, these operator selected rates still rellect an average increase over actual 1997 rates of approximately forty-flour percent I The following table provides a comparison of Marcus' 1997 rates and the proposed 1998 rates I 7- COMPARISON OF RATES FOR 1897 AND 1098 Marcus MPR' Marcus OSR" 1997 Rates 1998 Rates 1998 Rates Hourly Service Charge $1903 $2749 $27.49 'Monthly Lease Rates Basic Remote $0 13 N/A NIA Addressable Remote $0,16 $018, $018 Non-Addressable Converter $095 51.43 $1.43 Addressable Converter $257 $380 $325 Add Cony With Guide NIA $401 $395 'Max mum Permitted Rate I"Operator Selected Rate I ANALYSES OF THE FlUNGS 1 Project Objectives and Activities I The project objectives are three-fold, I Assessment of the completeness of the filings with regard to the information and documentation that must be filed with the City, 2 Assessment of the reasonableness of the proposed computations in light of FCC regulation and recent FCC rulings. 3, Assessment of the reasonableness of the proposed computations in light of Marcus' proposed method of aggregation. (riven these objectives, C2 conducted the roll, aing project activities: a Review of the filing to assess the completeness based on the FCC Form instructions • Review of the filing to identify any issues with respect to the data Ill • methodologies employed by Marcus • • • Submission of follow-up data requests and subsequent review of Marcus' responses For all remotes, basic arid addressable 36 td PJ s 0 \Ir Richard Foster 198 \tay 15. Page ? a Conduct of follow-up telephone comersations with Marcus' representatixes to discuss identified issues a Review, of recent FCC decisions that may have an impact on Marcus' proposed methodologies or the City's alternati%a actions a Ikvelopment of potential alternatives available to the City in establishing maximum permitted equipment and installation rates Summary of Findings i C2 identified four main issues with respect to Marcus' proposed computations of maximum permitted equipment and installation rates. The issues are: • Marcus inappropriately included costs in the computation of "Tools" on Schedule A that results in a "double recovery." a Marcus inappropriately included an approximate twenty percent inventory in comerters . • Marcus inappropriately included a one-time terminal placement cost in the depreciation expense for comerters • Marcus inappropriately included depreciation expense without an offsetting entry to the accumulated reserve for depreciation. A. Inappropriate Costs Included In "Tools" In its computation of the Schedule A cost components, Marcus has included in dte 'Tools" categon, costs related to what is termed as "Customer Billing Equipment Rased on Marcus' response to a r•!qucst for information, these costs are, "The costs of purchasing billing related equipment and software."' Marcus has allocated the total balance in this account based on the number of equipment basket related service calls during the year (30.39°0) 1 C2 takes issue with the inclusion of these costs for the following reasons, 1. It appears that Marcus did not "unbundle" such costs into the equipment basket during the "unbundling" process and therefore, inclusion now would result in a double recovery 1 2 Marcus has not employed a reasonable cost allocation methodology. As you recall, Sammons Communications, Inc was the cable operator at the time when • the FCC Form 1200 Form 1205 was filed with the City. Through the processor "unbundling" the costs for the equipment basket from the monthly programming services 3 rates, the installation and equipment costs were permanently separated as a "stand-alone" IvLeo See letter dated Stay 11, 1998 from Mucus Cable ro y; 37 32XIC1 i , a i i S \1r. Richard Foster Vas, 15 1998 page 4 computation each subsequent year Due to the formulae by which the -unbundling" was calculated, arc costs that were already incurred (or continually incurred each year) that were not included in the equipment basket computation, were, by default, included in the computation of the monthly programming rates And, because the monthly programming rates "roil fixward•• with each new filing, these costs are permanently included in these monthly rates, plus have inflation added with each filing, Based on the analyses and data presided by Marcus during a review of its 1995 Form 1205 Ishorily after the purchase of the system from Sammons Communications, hx) it appears that Sammons did not "unbundle" the costs for customer billing equipment, ror did Marcus include these costs in its 1995 computation ot'Schedule A. Howes er, this year, Marcus has included approximately 5442,000 in the calculation of the HSC (impact ofapprovmately 50.69) f~ The data reseals that these capital costs are not new, do not appear to have been ''unbundled" during the Form 1200. Form 1205 process, and were not even included by 9 Marcus in its "first" Form 1205 for the system. To allow the Company to recovery these costs now in its Form 1205 would proside for a "double recovery" of these expenses from subscribers In its decision DA 96.1753, the FCC found with respect to the issue of double recovery, "Because TC1 did not include these costs in its previous Form 1205 uaed for the Form 1200 unbundling, including the costs now would result in a double recovery of the costs, once in the monthly programming service rates and again in the converter charges themselves. Allowing these costs permits an operator to identify 'oserhead' costs for the equipment basket it hed not unbundled when the initial rates for monthly programming services were established.'" The FCC went further in a 1997 decision "When TCI-SL files Form 1205, in IW4 and 1995, TCI-SE. did not include these insurance costs in its calculation of equipment basket costs. These costs, therefore, were recovered in program service rates, In assigning these costs now to its equipment basket, TCI-SL should have deducted them from its program service rates, otherwise TCISI, would be recovering these coats hsice.'•s 17ten if Marcus could demonstrate that these costs were, in fact, "unbundled" from the monthly programming services rates, e.A would not result in a "double recovery;" the Company clearly has not used an appropriate allocation factor to assign such costs to the equipment basket. Service calls conducted during the fiscal year do not appear to have • any relationship to the billing activities oih;•r than particular service calls are billed to the ' It 1 Cablecrsuwr of Neluth Inc. Cons,lrJalaaf Order UA 96.1751, refeased October 10, 1996, paragraph 16 1 t 7 r ablot loon of ,G 1 ami s Order DA 97.2009, released September 29, 1997, paragraph 20 38 _4 - W I - 9 asao..w , 0 \Ir. Richard Foster \lav 15. 1998 Page subscribers liowever, most other services received by the subscribers are also billed; regulated programming, premium channel programming, pay-per-view programming, potentially digital programming, etc. A more appropriate allocation factor would be based on the transactions that are actually billed, including any adjustments that occur due to billing inquiries i Based on C2's review, Marcus has not supported the reasonableness of including the costs for customer billing equipment, Therefore, C2 recommends that such capital costs be excluded from the computations made on Schedule A in the "Tools' category, B. E%CMhre Inventory Pursuant to a request for information, the Company responded that the capital costs shown on Schedule C represented a twenty percent (20°Js) inventory of cumcrters.6 As stated in the response, " Approximately 70% of this inventory represents new converters purchased at the end of 1997 to be implemented in rebuild areas In the tint quarter of 19"." [emphasis added) Based on the Form 1205 instructions, the gross book value of equipment included on Schedule C ca,iinclude: the cost of a reasonable number of spare customer equipment units that the operator keeps on-hard as replacements for broken equipment Pursuant to the formulae, the operator would include the capital costs of such "spare units" without reflecting these units as "in service" on Line C of Schedule C. The result is a higher per converter cost in order to compensate the operator for the requirement of having "spare units" to easily replace damaged or non-fun,'ioning units. I lowever, a twenty percent inventory of equipment, of which most is scheduled for active deployment within the calendar quarter following the test year end, does not appear to satisfy the classification of "spare units;" but rather appears to be the acquisition for . immediate use. Therefore, if Marcus is going to include the capital costs, then there should be some portion of the units that are considered "in-service" since not strictly acquired as spares. I he I CC hati taken the position that it is the burden of proof of the cable operator to support any level of equipment inventory. As noted in FCC Consolidated Order DA 95 it 720 See letter dated %lay 11, 1998 from Starcus Cable to C2 Form 1205 (Reused August 19961 Instructions for Schedule C Capitol Costs of Leased Equipment, Line u 39 I r 32 10 A awsnaa C o r %It Richard Foster %lay 15, 1999 Page 6 i 'in rate regulation proceedings, the cable operator, not the franchising authority, bea the burden of proof. The determination of whether a cable operator should be allowed to recover the costs of allegedly excess inventory in its rates is an issue to be left to the discretion of the local franchising authority, and we will not disturb the findings of local franchising authorities if there is a reasonable basis for its decision' I i In the above matter, the local franchising authorty adjusted the gross book and relat:d capital accounts to eliminate "excess imentory" as not being appropriately paid for by current equipment users. In the instant filing, however, the circumstances are such that the capital accounts should not be reduced, but rather, the "in-service" counts should be increased to reflect the immediate planned deployment of the units. Although the computation is different in the two cases, the result is essentially the same, the inventory (the costs of units not included as "in-service'") is reduced to a more reasonable level. C2 adjusted the imentory to reflect a ten percent (10%) level rather than Marcus' { proposed twenty percent (2006) inventory. Based on Marcus' response, C2 computed seventy percent of the inventory as new addressable conveners with the remaining inventory comprised of non-addressable units. Assuming that one-half of these units are neccssaq as "spare" under the FCC definition of reasonable inventory, the remaining half has been included as part of the in-service counts for the respective converter types. Because the adjusted converter lease rate computation now includes these estimated additional units as "in-service", a reduction to the gross book and related capital accounts for such excessive inventory is not required 4 C. Installation Expense Inappropriately Treated as Capital Costs According to information provided by the Company, Marcus had included what it has I termed as, "One time cost incurred for terminal placements in rebuild areas -"o Marcus stated that these installation related costs have been included as depreciation expense for the addressable converters because it is 100% related to the addressable conveners and, due to form limitation, there is not a separate line item for these costs A The I CC Form 1205 instructions provide the following description of costs that are to he included as depreciation expense on Schedule C, i j , s r'rom n Sredio, Arc d h a Cr,n+n Coble. Consolidated Oder UA 95.720, released April S, 1995 0 ' If C2 had determined that the twenty percert inventory war strictly reialed to "spare units;" the A adjustment would be to reduce the capital accounts for excessive inventory rather than to increase the JV1 number of units in•smice Because these units appear to have been purchased for immediate deployment, the adjustment to the in-service unit coinis seems more reasonable See Lener dated Stay 11, 1998 Pom Mucus Cable to C2 See Marcus response to request for information, item 024, dated April 7, 1998 40 KID 3~xI❑ 0 r I Mr. Richard Foster %la% 15. 1998 Page J "Enter here your current provision for depreciation based on the year-end balance for the equipment included on this Schedule." Clearly, this definition does not provide for installation activity costa to be included as a , capital component By doing so, the computation proposed by Marcus results in a recovery of converter asset costs that is greater than the actual total cost of the asset In C2's opinion, this is not the intent of capital recovery on Schedule C. In fact, the entire premise of the Form 1205 is to recover 'actual Los's" related to customer premises equipment, The FCC has ruled on a number of occasions concem ng cable operators' attempts to include additional costs as depreciation expense. For example, in FCC Order "VA 96• 2105, the FCC found: `Our rules do not provide for the amortization that WE included in its depreciation expenses on FCC Form 1205. Because TCl's methodology was improper, we find that the Cities were correct in disallowing that amount in TCYs equipment rates On the other hand, the FCC has ruled that certain additional costs car, be included as depreciation expense on the Form 1205 (that are not specifically identifed in the instructions?, however, these additional costs are directly related to depreciation expense, For example, in FCC Order DA 96-1136, the FCC found rloweser, where there is an unusual number of lost items which are not provided for in depreciation rates, a reasonable adjustment may be made to recover the costs. The Commission also recognized that local franchising authorities would need to be able to assess the reasonahleness of such adjustments. Thus, where the recovery over the next year would not cause an unusual rate spike, the Commission required operators to make an adjustment to its current depreciation by including any unusual losses in the depreciation expense reported"" The issue in this case was whether the ,-able operator should be allowed to include an amortization of substantial svni"I'lls of converters and remotes. Clearly, the FCC's position with regard to allowing these costs was that the operator was requesting recovery of the "actual costs" of the equipment that was no longer going to be available for use The terminal placement activity costs cannot even remotely be classified as related to the "actual cost' of the converters. The costs have not been capitalized into the converter accounts, but rather are being proposed as a one-time recovery through the depreciation Q • ° fr'r 10 rjHouaxwr, Lx. Consolidated Slemorandum and Order, DA 96.2105, released December 13, 1996, paratiraph 8 the issue here was TCI's inclusion of alleged "unfunded" deferred income tax in the current provision of depreciation on both Schedule A and Schedule C The Cities argued. in pan, that the instructions for the form 1205 did not provide for such Inclusion in depreciation II "Llrlcvn ri'l'l mire , Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 96.1216, released August 14, 19% 41 4' ,r~; 10 32 x 1 0 .i 1 r: Mr. Richard Foster May 15. 1998 Page 8 expense Even if Marcus could justify these expenses as asset related pursuant to the definitions provided by the FCC regulations, the costs should be amortized over the life of such asset, However. in Us opinion, the Company has notjustified the treatment of these costs as a depreciation expense and, therefore, such costs should be disallowed in the computation of the converter lease rates D. Inappropriate Balance of Accumulated Reserve for Depreciation Pursuant to the Form 1205 formulae, cable operators are authorized a return on the net book value of remotes and converters as a component of the monthly lease rates. As you are aware, net book value is computed by subtracting the accumulated reserve for depreciation from the gross book costs for the assets. This reserve includes all amounts preciously recovered through depreciation expense, r I > Based on C2's initial review of the asset account balances and the depreciation expense being requested on remoles and converters, it appeared that a portion of the current provision for depreciation was not reflected in the accumulated reserve. The result of this is that the Company not only receives the depreciation expense, but also receives a return on that p<rrtion not included in the accumulated reserve balance, Marcus reviewed the computations and determined that, in fact, there was an error. On May 14, 1998, Marcus provided a revised computation of the accumulated reserve balances for remotes and each type of converter. C2 accepted these corrected computations and has incorporated them into the overall calculations on Schedule C. SUNINIARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the above findings and conclusions, the City should consider taking the following actions: I Establish a maximum permitted Hourly Service Charge of $26,81. 2. Accept Marcus' proposed $2.00 rate for the changing of tiers of service. 3 Accept Marcus' proposed maximum permitted monthly lease rate for • remotes of S0.18 4 Adopt a maximum permitted monthly lease rate for non-addressable comerlers of 51,19, 5. Adopt s maximum permitted monthly lea>e rate for addressable converters • of 53.22 • • 6 Adopt a maximum permitted monthly lease rate foraddressabie converter 1 with the Navigational Guide of 53 ~I 42 i 32XC] 25 0 j 4 -CRON" i Mr. Richard Foster Page 95 1995 C2 appreciates having this opportunity to work with the City of Denton in review of the Form 1205 rates. If you have any questions regarding this report or need clarifications as to the recommendations, please contact his. Connie Cannady at (972) 726-7216. Very truly yours, f C2 Consulting Services,} Inc / `f I 1 r t. ' 11 t 1 ~ 7 f ~ fit. I. I as 43 K 25 M Q 32X d smut . A i 1 ncWI= 1 , 0 -veil W I \ I Vwb11.n.1 Vrtu I Mr. W o.Y1 M aLl"u ANl. RO 0.u.n. OC7 fL r It40v OD m"T YOr. ! IIIYn 1 ~ .a l'Air YrR«Y. irr IrWYr._ I w~lwl IR YAYY] I M adlnn Ya'n '1 V'1 IC IIJ fV^I. Il 1'n nl lJ'1 4n'?n lr 1-V'lI1V I r 1.r1` H V Y' 4. rn r'~:w •Y\ 1''• pu A}I P-' l e\.41nn IRe' LI'q al MA: /.111"Y e''! 1 w Ifn.\IlI R'\'M 1'_V Qn ' YYr AA%u' uL,JA.. I .p°.Yr Inka l nlln n lwe .n,1 ~Wtwlw Ane'il v}JI \.1: V l! 1 ".Neu,-0.ply Nerv:Nu+JOJ "4 LAW lwmn 4nw Y'.. .i..lr:e ~ I4 1'r Re nr.n lnwrwn M'mi ~IJMI 11'GIJI NIIIQ N~ :14 .u l4.MfAlA LU. ,14"4 r/ H 115nn. fe Rp llHlULI 'e•]' ea0' ' 1n ubn.«L'. •n IV. Re n.n Ynnn,wn Mml I~ 4 71 Y_4+IM hAV 'W I`aNM1J\rR Y ! ye 'vlulhrnv wl M. 1"! 'hl AHm%Ao, ln-. iw'I.Y.-44.-.Y~f IIY 41 YA gl11 n Rna!!Cw 1F.u ~.,tmen'. .MM1 I JnT~ AIr°' u1n144l A,n. lilr 11 hW ILAH+RInJlirr l' ^lA' Rn".l ~e,,4wd.M.nwAr W!u Y111 V. JJI ill IiIV"YJ'H 1:e1liYM11 11'411J'P) Y1L)41 1'errw M1oleR 1'W 4y [I'R I;IA.'.o:_4 1111 \'Re\ 71iMw!gl• LI wJI pM 4 4nu!„Nrtd 'w,'1 I • YI IWII\:YY 71iM 11i N6 LW.O'ffiY I;IyLYrIT: 11 e,11R IM) I 1.. \Vtl 1111 Y 4!. • 1 W ■ JRYY.I 71,ItYYRM' FVI 1 11w ip Mwl 1 N-A qnr' I I I f I` . YMIM 1.11%IlI LLIJIf4RYGrVI?KLILJ7 V NIV I IINTIAU UM1 R?lRL0.TPRM rw Yi f y'; t AR-nRU 1. IIAev\ Me to FM1rl.wLlir ' rr • 1 bn !Inw\fe ww~iN.w Afi 1'.'ll cwY LR'al dA' t:Wl, I'll It r. Y 1,(~VII IbILL Ilw.llm 4,wYY 71L-1/e P"1 ? 7,1 f Y!4 L a ` 1 r ~ Y I ~ Ate; n,w n4. Fn4+r q.a rr. '♦',~I 44 I ,t 32xl❑ IILJA~l Bosom ti's e. n. n nx.n gq.,nly rlP .r.- • _ r A n o' 1 II14( V III uU.I 11 UPTU llnnlr l I LVO I I.TOL4YI YYNt 1 Yrmr•'. inlal: Fnnxl n~rs nl .fin f. . d11u ♦Yrw Yr r.f. IolwAfl. _ nl rl',i Iwl'V':' ~ i lenu :I bn •LU WWU 1 ~F.r q,l^ Il rq w Yll]~Ml nl V+wl l'l IL ' q,e. ~ fna .'n LI H,nlna y I:P;r aun I p a X }u. Inll a ::.I rr 1'ae'4 Y }q. UMl✓A ?ln'to r. 11 F.w:' iJe.liwm fi.m 4r.,I 1IlYl1 IIIAI: r- awii r.. txn" r: Y,.n. r,L env .ti ..•R' }hSL V<I+ }„n ym ell -Yi' lM: Y': e.XeM' }'u Tyra r..n fnL II)I IJnN YIY Yi114i ~I11' 1 X v.t :1J ueLfvlVII }'L' L 'ul r\vu t01 LL X~ V V Y nMr.l I: Xr1i,OY1IIY E 1 YnJ V V YIN [ t v L1I1.11i11XM YY KII IHI LLLLf11IM1 t \,n 14.n ..114m bntl'u aM1 n P \.n 11•n'. PrLMi+111,rmr Yhbrai r.d w. IMm\n ~I:W \L1n•aal nIWI .1mr.11nYJ IMVIwYn nwA nnIMUni II 1.w IWn rJAxn~r'ei,ra.n ywJL.n Yw~ nLYUIIYweInwM1 nrv'w.m - r r G +In Lwa w.n A.m I n f , \~m Iwn T'rnuLa aaW nn,Yr~n Prm nX,~_ ~nre W.n yn LNYlwiillr nw}nrvliwr`ur,n 1 yx X ~,n 1 . .Ira.„n nwennr'Mm n •a rl' ; I Ir`, 1 { I r'1 Y 1 , ~~'y 1 v. i t I,r 1, r t 41 , Vo I f % ~ ~ ' r fir. r Ynr+w url y 1 + 1, P 1 LM lu4Ywliw Un IM ~ j X~ln:rr I~ ~!1 I 1 p n I 1 ' Li.P w } M1 1~ I. I I 1 1 r rr{' Ir 45 10 ppjjrr ff))~~ r Pw. i 4~ 1 ~ I i 1r, H,r✓ll+~~tt'13~11~l. ~~.'1\' T 1 ' .32 X A L" x Y l n ' v5•y. 2',Y ! t' rix ~ A •l6 A ~ ,~h ' ' I A~ 1 ~ rl ± I F t Y A l 14 / A r ; r! MOM" I 1 I Yr.l I!VV.n Vl'rinN 1' \IH M.. rl w rl }I,UryI P llt} U A 41,1 RYC fIl1U RYD Ip Pb Tt if D I "I U]. %'}A4 11U 311 .Mt II.0. YnblYlr~ r l r' . gJ IhwtllY. Jr4`nwe.l4MYb1 MII f!II'int')p' ri ' LrJMnI Artl}141rrrn u'nidlJUnM\DnMrIV 11xJUb An:I ~ Iil irr rl J'1 _!•J 'YrJ•_Mr ld 9 L14JiIlYrw J.l lfrnnan Lol~1.p: SI'P:.\e Ml! '.rrrwa lV'Ye^n J.I• nr'JVrvArYtV Cwerul.n. I y LmW'~~w_14n mw.r elYJJlJ wi'gu FUP+In'•wrdLwwlbea'Yr'elln•LInL SI'..IaJMII IIIrr 11rn 6 11.n.vr. Yl lrndlJUr.nlYrvrw rMn nl 4•v mwf 'rpm n1:r[L',le .f `brr Tai eon itn I:IT 1: r MiIi1D DIMLM1D IIM tfAI U.LYT.INt IIIrA r'i IY IYr rInInlY Yeti ~Ir A• •b Ax I wri.a 4119' ,.Lion n l n ' l rUIIY w 1•.'Yd J L YYiYa! JJ'll 9It1~ IMIi1M 1'!w/L r I 4a Y MJ1 M Ilrn Irtm Yq{•nr' I:OYN: h Y 1 \rv ~ f L'nuJ Y n tw ~ ~ 1 L . I w r 'IITIen - SSiw` r. \n. iqP Ni Vr Aw i inwl rbrJ 4mJ'.0m yl 1401 V LI. 5 .1 .14#LJi'Y~w .lry'V • Y n hrr III rnl Lnm nl IIY 1 I YSin: n: Yn 'Y,nlr.M wenl lY,n wJlY x~rrn lI.o LnD ~ ~ r + I AL ilr lY ruxnlw YrJ U.n;!I rl: 111n..I '.ertrM YJ.'/re J 1 w ANrr6.JJ_L.n 1 \.r rn L.n {.1111rr I wr.w LJJ Ynr Yt#~I IrJ YM., lArAJnL I.r ►Y 1.Y n+W ua AJdIY.FJ fml.rl YIM rwIllJmlrl ua ' 1FIAx~YI ' wn^r /.w AwfnYY FI VY.IM.IIY.T Y I: FI I'Nn # A.fN.arl '.ww•m pJJIY Aw Aq 'I'Y Mnll i LMJrII D Ln JI Jlr n Llexr J' nhnY I., Yn P'. MJrlrrni Yr. i'i. r,1.1 ! w'hwi WYe L1 J~1n1Mllnp t~.Fr _ tl(i I, l.~n,.n +r l'..I_rn l a.rnl IY'r.+rr L.. e. wn 11 . ~_`I ~'rnr wfieRlYNndl'rnl rl l•: ~ ~ ~1 r~ "L 1ln'I -r 111 m'w IWdIJ n.l LrAY: 4AnYMD n}A.l ~ y ?r/In Ledo Ir m'I,Irr' i_ r 1 1 1: LI' 1 III L14r1:a 1 1 ! .I' .I 1r.r ~J_i n~.rr lre!tmrA~uU luYA ry lrne _ y ' ,1. Ir L. i,.w,w 4rwy.n +m AI L_J_.~ YI ~ 'G'~• f ~ 1. 'I~ I ill' I I fr l `Ir 1y ~ y A~ G 'r C tl l A ti1P•t 1 I ~ I i.'S':, r t t .YJ; 1 Ifl' 1 1 r 1 1 '15 'l ~r r . "Irl y!9i t i • I r! Y.. n r 1 1 f I'd I !A N I I { 1 N ' A nr\'Y~ 1 I 1 i Nc len l:H ! f, Pyl lrWl1 0 kw 1wrGK ~ !i~•', 46 Ir%iA~1~'tY 4~ SC~. P 32 x ' ~ 1 I 1 1 r,r P I 1 MEOW" `r Y'r Nnnn 111rwTl b i n1FI YO+' J I N.~riW Nrwl YRrnnn I Rnnnl Nrmvr: Rw.xl r vdllrcwunr H.e.l.nl".n W.vN:q .dinn lrw SMAJr Irv fl I Ps'.lo' _ kM nM: CM1MA: LA PA: I+rl• rvMmnu 4rra' rvl +Lntll Y'A Y'm Ym trnvrrl I.r'r T.'b arm Enn\L4M"IMN IVVnMI'rll Y'..A' Y^n Ir .rl". .rIR rlt M'IJIMI rI 1vM.M Y-I1 Ta! Yell f mAn H'n r4nv vry.nln mLrnn lr 4tii~ N.y r-.IMi'~ :1x11 U II ' ' ~nI'T9n L'll' Yr+, YrR 1..' rn.m\w nP.r+lel:l Yl I'n1 Yam Y~~u I Arlin w grrrv. A . . tAknlrYAr+k M1Mi nr• Yllmw I rn nM1ll .v..rnn' ~.~Mrl r IWAIUXnre MUll:nn !rlnlwSMrrk'Ia RI NEl inI1 1'Y1'R'1 rl 1_rlf Bn9 n. LA I'9 L'R YAl IF WI; '_ql lL Unwb'u '.+11.n • Ir IUI}: j4' r'IY:-IM YI rL r l 1- 4rvL'r.l•n'1rn•o1n.Jnn 1?aITWr'IArrRI IL~~I MS:1A: 1.: 1~,)Yr11 A: Yn0 I t•~'n.rl ^,wnlr le y.IM:I I LW,Vq Ur •IU0 bal ~1 .n:11.1 rLnNr`~Yr "ArMleb~niram lA llMlYlr '.tn'I lo.P IWWI Y r vl~ln^.[M'4 11111.1 UIrV1 Lm ♦i • NMr VU N.rM {IM:19:1 {IIV U 1'1 Y'u At//11Y tillYrrlrgM/R • y lal llwvvsr Rr^n. I{•n C.m r r.dew LNr•krvnWr' Inp uw: lu' L'NYrR' ~ .A .6 \bnnm ln.n"r ltM?+In:'I YEN bmvl \vrry. nhY rnN rm Ln YlnW ^,I w\I w Yl ul T.nr Irma r YI Mien q unlrr.l rArn Lnw ml r lre fmk TlrJr n,•1 •:4 1tn 111 III 9n Yam """h 1.0 ID M VIII M/M IUO L!I,4 N4\/11t YMM DY Ip 11111P1 11`n r' e 4 sAYIrgrM1A=4 1y, I, nt, MI 'lay/n Ln 1. , 14.r1, 4 Il l+ry t ri w.rM lugr F InNr { K+p Iv' IrpYNr`q trn n LM W ' RI1/1~1•rLrr lwl Wyq Lnb }Mxl~l M r ' u rIJ M/LI ~VyY Sng [gr _~1"n I ru nrkrulnil ublf.rrYr.eYn~ I n3v frn MPwr~ D1 A '.Nn illrll\nu h.s ~ nA b -N rl/ IMit p OY k^n! tnn W I. 1 Iv.IAI • II r SgYlu TnyY Sn ~ rl.n ft. 1w W, I 1 L I 1 /r 1 j Iq 1 > ; l , r. s1 I'7r1 I.,rr •A. nn+ AMIiVA ~r A IY Il~Ill r: 47 S11 \..li ~ i 32 x 'ry1 D aw" ^ o , r } wJ r..m , 1rn+rl I+ \li~ 1,+.. LaluM.,1 m'w. r xrlX\YIDII IIM_IYl.llt\flYMl /UiYt. /Dl1Mgk\DI\ff U.lr lbYfUi} 'JJ „V.J~ u.r SniYm rlJYWnnw'iVnIJ\RS ri 11n Nlwv _.I\=.Ir.M°.,.L~~n fu NrWII,nNYlunlrrle lk4.N~JIL I~+:'~~~_.__ III MCI I~Ir.~l 1.1 Yrv.al'YrJ'.a1-IFUYa.waJ \WIIrxY `nIL/M II'?'.}n pq Y •'s R Irla L.rJr . 4 I.4 IarXal \im r+Lmarrlln All. \I. Y,eL. YlwwrP Pr rj..l, Lnr I In.ll"n'.w.N: wrJCa wEn kMLX'R.II l`I-1. Y,^_ILx %a~r.Y~. aar n_~LL,.! Yr I•r:C rlx Y:L.awl yn~,J P. mYE aM LU1}w~,.~. 'rl.n1 Y'..u 'LeILmN I.N Lelry ai'la lna IT' Ynr . .nrw.JlW }MMaea lunA~ YAwWr / R.YI IrwJa.e R/giie ry Iii I.x 11 tY• IY friR.11.'F MmA I.r..'Sn Ilanr'.M1I . u 11 u16mY R~arn nlYxr'WnI'n kAarAw In C1Le'Ij ! 4Rn I a t 'f ~r J I ~ f+i f I i~ . a ~ e g I :I I t,' /xIn I,.I , ^ xl A f,.1 I 1 ~I r. I M 1'YYI l i 1 ^ 48 +~y}, j 2. .5 !■■.t /4Y 'fir /k Vl', V i. Y r, r I ~1'✓J ~ a~ 4 ''l r LI r ,I O ,r i Imawn r I* I'r 1 YIV\lU~eIIIGI iI rpmrul rNInWlr4r l.w rm.. of ♦mi I ' n \.el NwJLrn brr _ 1 IrrJ'Ix n.r vanl lLrm, Wgi p ; l•r 411 ' ildl n q^.1eJ ll..n M11.4 • .Id n Y \dlnxnW f iM~ Mwia ua l4 n Irv { I 1 L llnndn n.d \dlep•y' r1n.n•4r..N•I'i4q I11m L11 .qw nJr rot. A Lrw •I 4n a•+l I _ I n P 11-N, 4rler 41 Mm1 -J b'VT'1.n 1'vmn u~ wnr.„medlm: lu• .r Jw•1r mbol 1 Sef i ' u,+nu 4r 1•l.N ',mm~]Lnn 4 u l!]^ on.n+.. 'nmn Mt •I li le 7' i n r• A4: eBnP• S"11 I ! 11,r11N1 lope Ir 1 r4 q rM p4Mn,n 'u A. Lw nl l•L' 4,1rlr Trn I.'f V1p -:;14 Ir,r i~ 1 \MH f Iri 00 IIN M It MMAJ w4•+•w•nw oM Lnhrre br n•11mM1OIVgn Ynl•1PA•n hn 1'. I ~b•rr:., adrW b'rn.w1~•r•dr\f nl~iM dnJm n.wr'MPMnn4l rrrlYm' I'41 1'nr,r. lnd nl'b yl.. ur•x wrulnl r.n •Ja'Mrf41rA' • 111 i 11 nnNor ii',nI ~Av Urm \6,r Mr .x, fr.'^f.n F'In r1 v nn.m ~rn.a yr Yn.~.n W lwaw Ln m!1 n'.b on1 1.4.Iwb.nprw.n Anf rvnlnf of oJlnr.reMfn' r \ . mw nMrnl rV I•vrm rllrtpN VtluV HIBM.VI t f npf3~I.IV4.P+'.l.\I6.\t\N.1IW^.Trr..r LN wpl"VlWk BI mt kU, l GJ'LD \frN 1 +1'19.1 '.L d,m♦ PD.ef 411. r, If r Iir 14. "1 r'V44Li6 ~ [ ' I~w,iM1 •M 1• nmmu+Vn n. rt.+n n•Mnwwr' Alrnw AnV b-!e etl!•'.rl .•e nn.~nnd Yn ' i v.r.,e ti'd,4Tnre ~ Mr:n i ~ ^'~it 4 I rr I41r I 1 f f 11 f 11L Lrn IPn ° " 4, e 49 j v. 11 1 + V fr!1+~fLt ~:f • ./,,Jyr /rax.~u IMM 11/•."1~11'~~ IL r { '1. _/{1(~~ ,,/y11.. L9 ~''fl M. + -`r~IsA'1, IL IV rf u }1'. I. SI VZX.io ,a O l i A(~hHt1i No AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET Apanda em Pate.-~/-+i AGENDA DATE: Junc 9, 1998 i DEPARTMENT: Finance ' , Cb1/DCn4/ACM: Kathy Du Bose, Assistant City Manager of Finance i i LS fBJEC RECEIVE A REPORT AND HOLD A DISCUSSION REGARDING THE RESULTS OF THE SUPPLEMEN'tAl, BUDGET PRIORITY QUESTIONNAIRE WITH C11 Y COUNCIL. I k BAC~r' ,KOUND Please find attached the results of the 1098.99 supplemental budget priority questionnaire. Responses from each questionnaire have been tabulated and ranked iz two formats. The first format ranks responses from highest to lowest by res onse ;nority, while the second format ranks responses from highest to lowest by effort rating. You will also find attached a summary of your responses regarding specific policy issues. By referencing the scale at the top of each page, the offort rating indicates the average level of effort the City Council would like in regards to a specific service area. The priority of response indicates a priority rank of I through 7 (1 =low, 7=high) for each service area. For example, suppose the effort rating for litter programs was a 4 (continue current effort), and priority of response was a 7 (high): this combination would indicate that Council was satisfied with the City's current effort in litter programs although it was establishing a high priority for this service area. PRIOR ACTIQNIREVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions) Not applicable. , FISCAL INFORMATION Nol applicable. , EXHIBITS (If applicable) 1 Supplemental budget priority mteslionrairc results. Re pectfully submitted: + ~ )o ortune Director of Management and Budget 2.5 x 3'2' X' 0 MA M04,98 RESULTS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1998-99 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET PRIORITY QUESTIONNAIRE EFFO1T RATING VALUE No Opiolon 0 Eliminate : urrent Effort 1 Substantially Reduce Current Effort 2 Reduce Current Effort 3 Continue Current Effort 4 Increase Current Effort 5 Substantially Increase Current Effort 6 'vitiate Nev, Effort 7 RANKED BY PRIORITY OF RESPONSE PRIORITY OF RESPONSE EFFORT 11=LOW; SERVICE AREA RATING 7-HIGH) Police Patrol 4.57 6,71 --c 4.29 rime investigation e.45 Street ConstructioWflebuilding 5.43 6.14 Emergency Medical (Ambulance) 4.86 6,14 Drug Abuse?Enforcernent Programs 4.88 6.14 Community Oriented Policing (COPS) 4.71 6.14 Legal Services 4.71 6.14 Electric Service 4,43 6.14 Street v ainenane! epeir 6.1-9-6.00 - Storm rainego improvements 630 3.0 Juvenile Justice stem .00 Youth Recrea_ion~ rogramms 6 . 00 6.00 Employe-eerLPl_rn~~d~ust~mentslBenefits 4.66 8.00 ev-~eTopment eview Process Fire uppresslon TV .00 Library Youth;Child_ren's Programs 4.86 5.86 Fire Prevention i 4.57 5.Bg- -Vin icipal Court _ 4.43 5.85 A Current Hotel/Motel Tax Contributions 4.43 5.85 Long Range Comprehensive __~_la_nning 4.71 6.71 - l+ater forage! eservas 4.43 9,71 Solid Waste Collection Library Programs (in General) 5.00 _ 5.57 Children Oriented Safety Programs 4.71 5.57 _ ® Contributions to Human Service Agencies 4.57 5.57 O Park Maintenance (Athletic Fields, Medians, owing) 4.43 _ 5.57 _ Personnel Recruitment 4.43 5.57 _ -Personnel _ 5.57 -CI rar x ens on 9.4y- Greenbelt System lenn ! eve o ment 9.00 533 Eco. Dev. • Dev, DIS Reietlons In Regard to Coheelw Comm. Policies ~W 2 32 x ]+rc fd s ,p Z 06 041B RESULTS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1998-99 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET PRIORITY QUESTIONNAIRE EFFORT RATING VALUE No Opinion 0 Eliminate Current Effort 1 Substantially Reduce Current Effort 2 Reducn Current Effort 3 Continue Current Effort 4 Increase Current Effort 5 Substantially Increase Current Effort 6 Initiate New Effort 7 _ RANKED BY PRIORITY OF RES°ONSE PRIORI l'Y OF RESPONSE EFFORT 11 a LOW; SERVICE AREA RATING 7-HIGH) Public Transportation (SPAN, etc.) 4.71 6.43 Economic Development • Utility In^entive Rates 4.71 6.43 Economic Deve oprnent - Utility Incentive lines ____T6_7_6.43 eiTY hborlhoo~ Services [NICE, etc.) 414 5.43 ork orce Diversity 4.T4 673-~ Emergency Preparedness (Management) _ 4.57 5.29 Develop Univ. Relations In Regard to Cohesive Comm. Policies _ 4.43 5.29 _ Employee Training/Development 4.43 5.29 Airport Development 60- STF- City Beautification (Parks, Facilities Medians) ti.14 Economic Development. - Development Facilitation 4.2 6, 4 -Wastewater Treatment Plant _ 4.14 6.14 Eco. Dev.- City Marketing Efforts (Brand Image, Comm„ International) 4.71 5.00 New Athlotic Fields 4.E7 5.00 _Eco Qe'v . Incentives for Development (Tax Abatement, etc.) _ 4.43 5.00 New Parks Park Expansion (in Neighborhood, Community) 4.29 5,00 Internr: Audit Services _ 4.14 5.00 _ Environmental Health (Inspections_ eic,) _ 4.14 5.00 ~ De-._'e op oC mput6ri:ed Community Calendar 4.86 Economic Development - Business Retention -4 5__ l Downtown Redevelo meet(ein t„ etc.) 4,14 47W_ 414 InTa/Data Processing Services __T.tW _Dicycle/HrkigTrail Development _ 4.57 4.71 Library Reference Services 4.43 4.71 6 -Library Audio Visual Services 4.14 4.71 _ p Code Enforcement - High Weeds/Debris Violations 4,14 4.71 Senior Citizen Programs 4.14 4.71 t -_od_en orcement - Demolition of ubstan and Idg, 4.4Y______4.67 T- raffil c t na izetlon/ iflering 4.43 4.67 rin Street 5`wee in I Eco. Dev. Chamber o Commerce Marketing Program (Indust let) 4.29 3 (r lI lilt 0 , 0 r~ 08!04x98 RESULTS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1998.99 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET PRIORITY QUESTIONNAIRE EFFORT RATING VALUE No Opinion 0 Eliminate Current Effort 1 ' Substantially Reduce Current Effort 2 Reduce Current Effort 3 I`I Continue Current Effort 4 Increase Current Effort 5 Substantially Increase Current Effort 6 Initiate New Effort 7 RANKED BY PRIORITY OF RESPONSE e , k' q ruwx w F PRIORITY OF ',ra''~ y, °(tru~tt' RESPONSE ~f~''.~ ~.V t hk I,St ,y SERVICE AREA !X;7, RATING =7rHIGH) ' i New Athletic Pro rams 4iV .14,! ,"N m 4.67.. ~"q -War in to is n orcement ecreation enter rogramsy Risk Management '$0,7"`~. I _ Economic Development • Small Business Assistance 4.29 4.43 Auto Theft Prevention Program, 4.14 4.43 Building Inspection 86 4.43 Low & Moderate Income Housing 3.8 4.43 A Airport Marketing Recycling Efforts Animal ontrol Civic Center ai^:ensnce . U4 c~l= onomlc Avelo ment - ntarnat ona Relations a rade o; A istortc r strict Preserve on 3.43 4.29 _In.`ill Policy Development 4.7 4.1 L Eco. Dev. - Black and Hispanic Chamber Partnerships 4.28 4.14 Eco, Dnv,- Dev. Workforce & Training Partnership wlUniv., NCTC, DISU .1 4.14 Litter Programs 4.14 4.14 ! Telecommunications System 4.00 4.14 o e Enforcement - gn Violations j7,, , 3 a ?_5~. 32x~~ ' o oe oa; s e RESULTS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1998-99 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET PRIORITY QUESTIONNAIRE EFFORT RATING VALUE No Opinion 0 Eliminate Current Effort 1 Substantially Reduce Current Effort 2 Reduce Current Effort 3 Continue Current Effort 4 Increase Current Effort 5 Substantially Increase Curren: Effort 6 Initiate New Effort 7 RANKED B EFFORT RATING PROBITY OF RESPONSE EFFORT 11. LOW; SERVICE AREA RATING 7+HIGH) Street ConstructiomRebuilding 5.43 6.14 t~ aintenance/Repair .29 6.00 _ " iq-r-e y !panslon 5,29 Storm Drainage Improvements 5 00 6.00 Juvenile Justice System 5.00 15.00 Youth Recreation Programs 5.00 6.00 Library Programs (in General) _ 5.00 5.57 Greenbelt System PlanninglDevelopment _ 5.00 5.43 Airport Development -5.00 5.14 -Ur use/En orcement rogrem9 4.80 6.14 Eme- r4en~~ediceI (Ambulance) 4.86 6. Libr~aryL ~oo~0t~~!__hildren'e Programs 4.66 ~u Employee Pay Plan Adjusitmenteleenefils 4.80 6.00 --rgF- 543 Eco. Dev, - Dev, DISD Relations In Regard to Cohesive Comm. Policies evelop Compute rite Zommurity Calendar 4.86 4.8e Community Oriented Policing (COPS) _ 4.71 6.14 • Legal Services i _ 4.71 6.14 Development Review Process _ 4.71 6.00` Long Range Comprehensive Planning 4.71 5.71 Children Oriented Safety Programs 437 5.57 Public Transportation (SPAN, etc.) 4.71 5.43 -Economic Development. Utility incentive Rates1 Eco. Dev.• City Marketing Efforts (Brand Image, Comm., International) 4.71 5.00 0 fnfill Policy Development 4.71 4.14 10 • Police Patrol .7 .71 ,;,t Fire_3_uPpe_eeTn _ 4.57 6.00 .5.88 U~ r~tfon .57 • ut ons to Human Service Agencies 4.57 Economic Development • Utility ncent vu Lines "4.57 5.43 `Emergenc-`y!!.repare ness (management) s i I q I l I 1 06 c4 9e { RESULTS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1998.99 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGFT PRIORITY QUESTIONNAIRE EFFORT RATING _ VALUE a IE i No Opinion 0 Eliminate Current Effort 1 Substa tially Reduce Current Effort 2 Reduce Current Eifort 3 Continue Current Effort ; Increase Current Effort 5 Substantially Increase Current Efrc t 6 vitiate New Elfo,t 7 RAN_K_uD BY EFFORT RATING PRIORITY OF RESPONSE EFFORT I1 .LOW; SERVICE AREA RATING 7m H1GHI i New Athletic Fields 4.57 6.00 _ Bicycle/Hlkirg Tcail Development 4.6! 4.71 I -wort Marketing .6 _ -Electric Service 4.43 6.14 Municipal Court 4.43 5.86 Current Hot6lViotel Tax Contributions 4,43 5.86 Water StorayerReserves 4,43 5.71 -Park Maintenance (Athletic Fields, Medians, Mowing) 4.43 5.57 Personnel Recruitment 4.43 5.57 Uevclop Univ. Relations In Regard to Cohesive Comm. Policies 4.43 5.29 Ernployee Training Development 4.43 5.29 City Beautification (Parks, Facilities ,Medians) 4,43 5.14 I Economic Development Business Retention 4.43 4.86 Eco. Ocv. • Incentives for Development (Tax Abatement etc J 4.43 5.00 Library Reference Services 4.43 4.71 Code Enforcement - Demolition of Substandard Bldg _ 4.43 4.57 _ Traffic Signalization Enyneertng 4.43 4,57 _ O Recycling Efforts 4.43 4.29 Crime Investigation _4.29 - _ Econumic Development - Development Facilitation 4.29 6.14 -1few Pai scV xp~ ansion (in Neighbo~floo ommunity) 3b- itreeS weeping _ 4.29 T- Economic Development • mall Business Assistance 4.29_ - Eco, Dov.- Chamber of Commerce Marketing Program {Industrial} -4.29 ----4-.57 p Economic Development ---BI acTc a-n-d Rispanle him er Partnerships -TY9----4-f4-- Sofid Waste Collection _ 4.14 _ 5.71 Neighbothood Sewlc_e_s_INICE, etc.) - 4.14 5~ Workforce Diversity 4.14 5,43 Wa i4V)ater Treatment Plant 4.14 5,14 internal Audit Services 4.14 5.00 6 .nrf-a:. r { V 0 .:vnn. u 0604; 99 RESULTS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1998-99 SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET PRIORITY QUESTIONNAIRE EFFORT RATING VALUE No Opinion 0 Eliminate Current Effort I Substantially Reduce Current Effort 2 Reduce Current Effort 3 Continue Current Effort 4 Increase Current Effort 5 Substantially Increase Current Effort & Initiate New Effort 7 RANKED BY EFFORT RATING y PRIORITY OF t a~ RESPONSE EFFORT (1 ■ LOW; eEFMCEAREA RATING 7•HIOH1 Environmental Health (inspections, etc.) 4.14 5.00 Info/Data Processing Services 4.14 4.86 Downtown Redevelopment (Main St., etc,) 4.14-4.86- Code Enforcement • High Weeds/Debris Violations 4.14 4.71 Library Audio/Visual Services 4.14 4.71 Senior Citizen Programs 4.14 4.71 New Athletic Programs _ 4.14 4.57 Auto Theft Prevention Programs 4.14 4.43 _ Eco, Dev.• Dev. Workforce & Training Partnership w/Univ., NCTC, DiSD 4.14 4.14 _ Litter Programs 4.14 4.14 and i Parking/Tre_ is En orcement 4.0 4.97- Recreation enter Programs 4.00 1 Anma o~T-' 4.w 4.29 elecommunications ystem 4.00 4.14 Risk Management 3,86 4.57 Low & IVToderata Income Housing 4.43 • Sending Inspection 3.86 4.43 Civic Center Maintenance intenance 3.86 4.29 Economic Development - International Relations and Trade 3.86 4.29 Historic District Preservation- -ode EFTo-icement - Sign Viol tioni 313 3. i 1 + I 51 MIMI- • 571aMf0 ' Q 7L1/Of70BIM RESPONSES TO BUDOET POLICY ISSUES 1998.99 BUDGET Below are specific actions or direction given to staff by Individual Counclimembers fordo velopment o! the 1998-99 annual budget. Southeast Denton Fire Station Ambulance service should be to the city only. Concentrate on TMPA R Electric Deregulation issues. Appropriate more money for street maintenance, rn, air,and reconstruction. I feel our parks, recreation, and youth programming have been somewhat underserved due to economic constraints and demographics. As our residenVal population Increases so must our attention to this service area. Move ahead with the next CIP program. For business growth corridors in Denton Plan: develop funding, proactivo development and infrastructure extension to attract and locate businesses where desired. Continue to aggressively at Lack our drainage problems. We should review Economic Development's direction and ap,,roach. North side library. Implement first phase of Civic Park Master Pian. Daycare Center in southeast Denton, one for tow income families. Develop specific site, small area targets jointly with DISU for schooliathletic field/ park use facilities; indontifying size, roadway access, other service impact and projected cost sharing prans that are site cpo6fia Code Inforcement is o high priority. Pluce more emphasis on street maintenance and construction. Small children's playground cquipment in Fred Moore Park, northeast side. e ~Attempt to gain uniform alternative deregulation strategies for all member cities by 11 getting 1 MPA to hire a consultant agreed upon by all members (e.g. if can't, have differing consultant select mutually agreabte consultant); 2) conducting a joint city council utilities retraaVconference to hear/respond toicivestio^ ;,a experts f both consultant and directors) controlled by the consultant; 3) perhaps have legislators from member cities or their aides atrend to develop legislative strategy; 4) perhaps have experts from Q .Sam Rayburn Power Authority do a presentation. This should have funding set aside D to accomplish and support this effort, We need more hiking and bike trails. Place more emphasis on drainage issues. 8 - i~ r r p l ` ~ i ~ i t ti I n , .4 • •r a r' K i 1988-99 BUDGET Below are speciTc action; ur rwcNon yfven to atsN by Individual Counrxmem bete for development of the 1998.99 annuar budget. Resurface streets - Robertson, Lakey, Mcrse, Wilson, Woods, Kerley, Duncan, Gwda, Bridget, Hill, Mill, Cook, Crawford, Maddox, Ave. S, Ruddell, Crosstimber, Scott, McDonald. Implement public improvements to the downtown area. Need to look at library expansion. More minorities in the Fire Dept. and City organization. t ~ Wo need to emphasize our libraries - need a bigger budget for books, personnel, act. Cost of living raise for city emplo,ees. Given the median market price of housing being built in the metroplex, Denton Is building more affordable housing. With cur currently high total tax rate, if our rates increase any, whether for municipal services, valuation, or school operations we will seo an Increasing segment of our population who can no longer pay their total tax rate and afford to stay in their homer Increase In pay for City Manager, City Attorney, City Judge and his staff. . , r I I 7• I i I M I +i 1 ..1 I I 1i J 'r 1 I ` 1 V } 9 hiy I OJO 1. . I y e a r I 1 Y r _ . __.'-...,...,.........+..r w.wrap..........._+~......_....._•_._ _ - - - Cumulative Landfill Revenue Potential ' $50 $40 $30 - $20 - - ` - - $10 so r---- --T-- r. - - - ----Y-- - 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 --#--No EVaWed Recy*V -~-WCI Recy*q+40,000 Tar A WCI RecycllV+1$0,000 Two z Cumulative LandfW Ravanur .1888 2M 2s3II1 2GQ2 I= 204 2M I` No Expanded Recycling 0.47 0.97 1.49 2.04 2.83 2.28 3.94 "I WCI Recycling + 40,000 Tons 1.13 2.87 4.64 8.26 7.98 9.88 11.83 4 WCI Recycling + 180,000 Tons 3.42 9.71 18.73 23.85 30.71 37.43 44.90 n k ` w I U ~ •.1`~ .t f-rl ^ EV~n P'Ed 32X•■% .ice POILAL • ~ I: } i ~I t,, II % r ~ t v - HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 6/9/98 ADDENDUM Marcus revised maximum permitted rates 06,'05/98 Basic rate: S9,44 5 Remote control: $0.18 Non•ad.lressable conwier: S1.20 Ac dressable conwier. 5139 Advanced analogue converter: $3.60 Flourly service charge: $27,64 Changing tiers: $200 - i J . I r 1 l r r ~ I e \a l 4 1 I , la fa i PIO COMI I Y' nddmdwn S.a ` I r I a Ahs 10 32X awe" y r O mYA" TEXAS IMPACT FEE ACT JCHAPTER 395) General Provisions ► Fees may be assessed only for roads, drainage, water, wastewater. ► Fees may be assessed within city limits and ETJs (except for roads). ► Fees may include land, improvement, financing and consultant costs, ► Fees may not be used for non•CIPs, 06M, rehab or administration. Land Use Assumptions/Capitol Improvements Plan Required ► LUA must project density, intensity and population 110 years). ► Qualified professionals must be used to prepare CIP. ► CIP shall contain existing facility capacity, needed expansions, service unit table, projected service units 6 projected demand. Assessment Procedures ► Platted lots have one year g. ace period after fee adoption. ► Fees assessed at subdivision platting /locks in fee schedule. ► Fees may be collected at platting, connection, building permit or CO. ► After assessment, fee increase allowed only if service units increase. ► Developer agreements may establish timing and method of payment. Administrative Procedures ► Credit for off-site road dedications/contributions required. Fees must be deposited in interest-bearing accounts (earmarking). ► Fees must be refui-ded if not spent within 10 years. Adoption/Update Procedures ► Public hearings required for both LUA and CIP adoption. ► Three consecutive weekly newspaper ads (1/4 page/18 point type), ► System-wide (non-service area) LUAs allowed for water/ wastewater. ► Advisory committee (5+/40'x)/plan commission (+1/+1FTJ) required. AC shall review, monitor, advise and prepare semi-annual reports. o > LUA/CIP updates required at least every 3 years. l i it .9 ! Y . 3 X ' O { 1 r POLICY ISSUES Time of Fee Collection Can be Collected at Platting r. Connection/Building Permit is Most Common Phase-In Period Platted Lots Have 12-Month Grace Period No Statutory Phase-In for Unplatted Lots Percent of Full Net Cost Calculated Fees are Maximum Potential Fees City Can Charge Less (Across the Board) i Credits 1 Phase I Fees Cover Only Central Facility Costs Not Required to Credit Line Co,;struction Exemplons Schools, Churches, Affordable Housing Will Request j City Should Reimburse Impact Fee Fund if Fees Waived I Updates e Required Every 3 Years, Can Do More Often Inflation Escalators not Recommended 4 ' I 10 32X' 10 unwr,w 0 Mom" i I i IMPACT FEE FORMULA MAXIMUM IMPACT FEE = SFEs x NET COST/SFE r Where' SFEs = Single-Family Equivalents represented by water meter, computed as meter rapacity Jin gallons per minute) capacity of typical sing?e•family meter NET COST/SFE = COST/SFE - CREDIT/SFE COST/SFE ELIGIBLE COSTS NEW SFEs ELIGIBLE COSTS = Cost of 1999.2009 improvements needed to expand capacity x capacity needed for new SFEs 1999.2009 total new capacity created by improvements NEW SFEs = Projected new Single-Family Equivalents, 1999.2009 CREDIT/SFE = Net present value of outstanding debt payments per SFE ..r 1 1 ' 2 5 x 32 x d