The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLAKE RAY ROBERTS CORRESPONDENCE •,r i 1 r11r`` U f 3I I i MWO Sys Empire Microfilm Company ' Dallas, Texas 214-243-6173 F F J t • ROBERTS p~ PRJ LAKE CORRESPONDENGF, lam/ jj .L r A , c ` a (J~ + 11 I n 'F} t, • v • 1 JJ ~t~ 11111 L.. 14 tJ, f ~ C`'/tfi~ K u N r THE CITY OF DENTON HAS FIND APPLICATIONS WITH THE FEDERAL- ENERGY , REGULATORY C"ISSION `fMTING PRELIMINARY PERMITS` FOR HYDROELECTRIC GENERATORS i FOR LEWISVILIE AND RAY MOTS LAKES, THE CITIES OF DEMON AND DA1J.AS ARE COOPERATING IN THIS PROJECT, SINCE DALLAS HAS THE MJORITY CONTROL OVER THE WATER , DENTON HAS THE ELECTRIC UTILITY SYSTEM AND PERSON'. TO OPERATE THE FINS, WHEREAS PWIOSED FACILITY, DONTON AND DALLAS ARE P 'LY NEGOTIATING 1W SHARING OF , BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED H YDROELFCTRIC UNITS A PRELIMINIAFY FEASIBILITY STUDY INDICATED THAT WATER FLOWS FROM f 9~ J r IEWISVILLE LAKE COULD SUPPORT A'SINGLE 1,700 KW GENERATOR AND COULD PRODUCE f APP MIMATELY 6,700.000 W PER YEAR, THE COST OF THE UNIT IS ESTIMATED AT 357 000.; THE STUDY ALSO INDICATED THAT WATER FLX FROM RAY RATS LAKE COULD 1907 r SUPPORT 'A SINGLE 1,300 KW GOBATOR AND COULD PRR CE 9,250,000 ` KWH PER YEAR, THE ORO INITIAL ESTIMATED COST WAS $2,551,OM BUT SUBSEllW DESIGN DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS INDICATES THAT A $1,300,000 STEEL. LINER WILL BE REOUIPS 'IN. THE 13 FOOT DID TUBE WHICH WILL TIC RESULT IN A TOTAL COST OF APPROXI- MATELY $4,000,000 THE PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY INDICATES THAT THE PROJECTS ARE WITH CAPITAL RECWERY ESTIMATED AT APPRI.U(IMATELY 15 YEARS, EC"CALI.Y FEASIBLE ALTHOUGH TIE FIRST FEW YEARS MAY RESULT IN NEGATIVE SAVINGS THE PROJECTS WOULD PLAN TO UTILIZE THE EXISTING 64" DISCHARGE TUBE AT LEWISVIL.I.E AND THE PLANED 13 FOOT DISCHARGE TUBE AT RAY RMERTS, „IN-LINE" 1 TURBINE WOULD BE USED AND ONLY MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE DISCHARGE SYSTEM AVERAGE HEAD IS 65 FOOT AT L EW I SV I L1E LAKE AND 90 ARE PLANNED, THE ESTIMATED FOOT AT RAY RMERTS h r r ~ :1 I 3 IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE RATE OF DISCHARGE FROM LENISVILIE LAKE M CONTINUE TO BE C IZ BY TEE CITY OF DAL19 AND ONLY MINOR "MIGHT BE EXPERIENCED IN THE DISClM RAZE OF PAY ROBERTS, ClWff-S DENTON IS ppEsEN'TLY PROCEEDING WITH A C.gMPI~lE FEASIBILITY STI~N AND HAZE A HYDE .F.. AND 06 To STAIN A LICENSE FOR LEWISVILIE LAKE IN M UNIT OPERATIONAL BY LATE 1983, Tif WX UNIT FOR RA's ROOTS LAIC WOULD BE j CUVLEB IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SIR. ALT} TAE PXR AND DW AVAI LABLE FROM TtESE HYDRO UNITS A My NOT BE LARGE IN COMPARISON ` TO MOST OR GEI+ERATING STATIONS, TFEPE IS STILT. SUFFICIENT ENERGY>TO SERVE THE Num OF A COMITY WI'► i A POPLAATION OF ApPfmXI1 ATELY 1,600 PFAP f WITH TODAY'S RISING COST AND `IRXASING SCARCITY OF FUELS, FOR CONVENTIONAL. ELECTRICAL CEfVATIONi► WE ARE EXCITED a WE ",APPRECIATE All Off TAKING MIIN TAPPING THIS NATURAL 8EM-., OF IC S Mg THAT THE CITY OF NA AND THE CORPS OF U'PORT AND COOPF.RA ENGINEERS HAVE GIVEN US AND LOOK FORPM TO WORKING AND SHARING WITH TO E l IN THIS P&ECT, E 1 f E a ; , ,.a f4' ;x r. . SHARING OF BENEFITS RAY ROBERTS & LAKE LEWISVILLE HYDROELECTRIC PACILITIES City of Denton--City of Dallas The benefits shall be ahared based on the following: r I. Denton shall share with Dallas the benefit of the hydroelectric 3 energy resulting from the flow of DVIllas' safe yield 14ater flows s = of 54 MGb from; Ray Roberts Lake (less such flows Dallas may make to other entities directly from the Lake and not flowing through they hydroelectric facility); 2. Denton shall share with Dallas the benefit of the hydroelectric E energy resulting from the flow of Dali,as' safe yield water flows of 94 (2) mGD from `Lewisville Lake (less such flows Dallasmay -makk. to `other entities directly from the Lake and not flowing through they hydroelectric facility). j 3. The net 'benefits shall be the difference between the costs Denton experiences in owning and operating the hydroelectric 'facilities and the lowest non-firm electrical energy available to the City of Denton. i 4. The share of such benefits due to the City of Dallas by the City of Denton shall be a_ percentage of net benefits (such percentage to be negotiated= suggested range ld%) 510 The `cost of owning and operating the hydroelectric facilities shall include all 'direct operating and maintenance expense, all direct and indirect administrative expenses, plus a rate of return on the rate base, i 6. Rate of return' shall be based on the embedded rate of, interest t for the project (or an interest rate equivilent to the City of Denton's electric revenue bonds at the time the project(s) is Einanced')# plus 1,5% as compensation for the risk associated i with ownership and management responsibili~ies, t I ; E. E J too) Page 2 ,y 7o. Rate of return shall be applied to the rate base which shall be ! composed of depreciated original plant investment', construction ; work in progress (CWIP), and an allowance for working capitol All cost of 'service expenses shall,-be based on the "utility method of accounting. 5 The benefits shall be calculated and payable annually based on the City's fiscal year and paid after operating results have been certified by an outside firm. 9. In return for sharing the hydroelectric benefits, Dallas agrees j to operate Ray` Roberts Lake and Lewisville Lake discharges such ,,that hydroelectric Rnergy output is maximized. I I 7301A F 1 ~ f i r ; L 1 pIMON W. FAE sC r : - - .:.JAMES 11. HIC.001.$ ' ! - TIOBCAI 1.: NtC.I40I,S i tt Lf,C n. rHELSE -Oqlt Y R U E S C -A ~t E) 111 I C 11 0 L IS JUC I'14UL JONES" C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R- S JOE 6. MAPES OCICC ALLEN. j.:. ry (~q ROFIVRI A THOMI'SON M7 April ?1, t7/5 W.' EHNE51 CL1:MENT i.. ELVIN C. COPELANO ALBERT R, ULLRICH Mr. Jams W. White,' City Managery City of Denton Municipal Building Denton, Texas 76201 1 Re: Agreement with Dallas, K 1 Relative to Aubrey; Reservoir Dear Jim: I have reviet-;ed.the proposed draft of the Dallas agreement on Aubrey, which was sent to,yau.last week by Frank Booth, It seems to me to be a good basis for further discussion with Dallas. In order that you may have'thein'readily t available', the results of our own hydrologic studies are as follows: ti a. Ouryield 'studies show the estimated incremental yield made available by Aubrey Reservoir in 1985 to be 82:0 MGD, as i compared with the 81.4 MGD estimate of the CbFps, This is quite close agreement, and I believe that you,should'go'ahead a with the Corps figure for purposes of.negotiations with Dallas. I b. Return flows will be relatively important in the over-all yield of the t1m Fork. The total return flow above Lewisville Reservoir is estimated to have been. some 4,3 MGD in 1970 and to increase to 16:6 MGD by 2000. How6er, unless the return .flows were judged to be applicable to the Aubrey project in' whatever, eventisaI determinations might be made by the Water Right ,Commission; the E maximum share that Denton could expect to claim would presumably be 4.8% (bnsed on the Denton share of the off inal Lewisville I f storage sp,~,ce). This would represent .8'MG0 48% of 16.6 MGD) l as of the ytur 2000, 1 believe that Denton would be justified C in not pressing the return flow issue provided you can reach agreement on a firm supply of 25.7'MGD as set forth in F'rank's contract draft. I C. Prfor rights should have'little or no effect on Aubrey, Insofar astthe Aubrey yield is concerned, such rights should relate only I TELEPHONE a17 936..7161 ell LAMAR STREET FORT WORTH, TEAS 76io2 L - - - Mr. James W. white -2- April 21, 1975 to the portion attributable to runoff occurring during the critical drouth period. Except for one month (June 1951all runoff during, E the historical critical drouth on the Elm'Fork would apply to the j yield of the original Lewisville project, and not to Aubrey. Virtually all of the Aubrey yield is due to having added stbrage capacity that would be full at the start of a drouI'h and avail able for use through the dry years. Yours very truly, t FREESE AND NICHOLS ~ By_ # RSGcjd ober~ G och, P.E. cc: Mr. Frank Booth Mr. Douglas Blackburn t . f E . t y • ...irr n.•d' saf z~r%.h-WP. f J VEX WATER lREG), NTRROFFTCE MEMORANDUM PAII: APRIL 20, 1976 - MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION 10 film LEGAL` DIVISION, STAFF ATTORNEY' SECTION sgffECt: AUBREX RESERVOIR PROJECT HEARINGS ; the files in connection with Aubrey project and ' I have reviewed to your attention a numb©rrocedurc may iandacontenthOfh would like to bring j be relevant to your determination of the p your final decision. The Commission has received praioUt litytDistrictsNO~# i of_ 001 L~ Manic p 10- clusions of law from The Colony Denton County, Texas. In accordance w h the APA and Rule 129.04. d to rule on each - cs oexa th@reto, th.e Commission is require copy o The I attach a adopted in r p and conclusion of la ~ au during the April 22, l proposed fact finding ro riate order draft. CoSony'srinoposals and requcsd.eor amind an app p 1976 hea g, so that I may Prepare artment have Dep from Parks and Wildlife llxtensiv'e suggestions nd s arties. This on all Pa I received by the Commission aerved upon operational safegua been rds and with Proposed Wildlife Department's material has to (10 primarily liaritations I attachcopiesof the Parks an e and-ask that the Commission direct me during the April correspondonc include in'the draft girder; and other 22, 1976 hearing, so that I may if anys documents, appropriate' spec al conditions, Garrisori, FIXecutive The January 12, 1976 letter from C'carosras an attachment artment, Southwestern Director of Parks,,and WiXdi975 ~epter frrom John L. Franso~:n which the a copy of the December s, ! Aud Regional Representative °feisacalled intobquestionton the C he C mmi and ommission ! feasibility of Aubrey Project environmantAl grounds. In its order of August 2, 196, project was feasible as d'escribedTezasheprepared ! determined that Auon Trinity River and Tributaries hensive Survey Report s of gngineer51 It is for the Commission to deter- ! by the U, S. Army 'Corp uestion in 1•ight of present cir ! ter of the Nationa,l.Au4uban Society mine whether 'ta reopen the feasibility q cumstances.The'Huntsv3 Chap review. 4 aitici~ants in the 1963 .feasibility. ! was one of the p aeration of Aubrey ; cO'iider tile ( 4. The Commission should nadd tioiia'ln~fa}ctdfindings t co concldetausi ns ils l ' as a subject for pussiblv ormit. The opera ti s and' o£olaw and special conditions _in ththe e PO Mks grid Wildlife request . may be'of relevance in considering s and ostuarios and other ! ' in assessing tltio impact if any on the bay ccossnry betwee all ordeaicp`ro concerns, An operational l to bo agreement to at~d environmontal, Project would se rin Order to participants in the ' 'C ovordraftinE aspect of the apPl• ...vide a workable aivislon. , °~tilon wato r avai,lal>lo for aponal agrocmont•t to avoid unnoccssary lit1L o eratr cations adds to the importance df requiring an P 'shouldhre u.ir ssioni~erational agrco- tiro' erm.its and orders Lant in in ri psubject to approval by t moat i wrrtin > -2- APRIL 20, 1976 MEMO TO THE COMMISSION 5', I have requested that Permits Division review the Corps of Engineers' July 1.974 Final Brivironn1ental Impact 5tatem'snt, Aubrey Lal fi, Elm Fork Trinity River, Texas, to determine whether or not the facts stated therein support th° conclusions reached regarding potential impact on the bays' and ostuzries and whether the Statement included conservation f an assessment of the impact of, te wollpasthoaproposedeaerdrSfteing of Storage in Lewisville Lak , as ' the Aubrey Project. I'believe that the Corps' Statement on Aubrey Lake is ali that is currently an the record before the Commission. The i Commission may wish to solicit supplemental evidence from its staff as i well as the parties. • b 1 join wi,tlk Permits Division in its recommendation that total . ' annual diversions from all sources by each pex;mitteo be limitelitoes. the firm annual yield of.all the permittee s water supply City of Denton is permit the Commission should consider granted a v some method of accomplishing this result in light of Denton's partial dependence on groundwater. 70 The Commission has assumed jurisdiction over Application No. ! . 3535 by Collin-Denton County Water and Sanitation District, taking I cognizance of the stipulations and waivers of 611 panties, Though such stipulations and waivers regard, calsateralenttacksuuponftanyCa~n- rights.of the parties in this g mission's jurisdiction would still be pdssible. Since believe hestrict has Commis- been a party to these hearings from the outset, I sion could establish its jurisdiction over the application by having notice of hearing of Application No. 3535 Mailed and published for a hearing 'to"be held on. the same date as,a continuation of the current hearings now in progress. In re aring drafts for permits and amendments' to pe mittst~ie ~ wouldbe heipfup if the Commission would indicate its reaction to following possible special conditions; 1 (a) No diversions under this permit shall be made by permittee until a copy of a contract between permittee S, Army Corps of Engineers, by Aich permittoe and the U, I. acquires conservation storage space authorized horotsnd+ar, I is filed with the Commission. (b)' f?ormittee shall not increase the conservation storage { in Lewisvillo Lai o until such time as 'tile clam for Aubrey Luke is complated so as to provide storm and floodwater i + storage capacity equal to or greater than the increased conservation storage in Lewisville Lake, All water harein authorizod for release or diversion ' shall, if used outside tlsc Counties of Cooke, Collin., Denton and Pallas in 11m Fork Trinity River Basin, be subject to aboe lko cdomesticTriniustyorRives within the above • basin, • s f, APRIL 20, 1976 MINO TO TIM COMMISSION in.shal1 be construed to create or ' (ii) Nothing here arty or person to the acinowledge a right in any pa, i a pro ledg of wator`which may'at a; future date be k authorized for transwatershed diversion into, and , appropriation within, the Trinity River Basin. . ° were not intended to be exhaustive, The above poSsibilities •in ,adequato 'di- but ratherto promote' specific discuersion t~itsrand lamendments Y will section necessary in 'with the parties and`the Commissionts staff in' , i wit meter- Hoed to work closely preparing the p older to develop.: language for tl~eso documents relative to any inimum'stream flows to be maintained, reports to be gauges, ] ing, submitted, etc. regularly all enforceable limitations which the Commission 10. qry leg Y permits themselves in order 1 fans to impose 'should be included oin the n us p s and concllusions of law adequate to sup- o be bindina. Fact finding port all provisions of the permits should be included in the order to Which the permit is attached, Respectfully submitted, ' RY TAP9TTY j' RP:tX 1 1 E i . k { r z 14 J ° . ' TEXAS 4~1'~97I'IER RX-JS (00MOS1IDN INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM j TG' The Commission Da April 22, 1976 FROM Permits Division sgvicr: Cities of Dallas and Denton Aubrey Reservoir and Lewisville Enlargement Elm Fork Trinity; River ~ Trinity diver ~3aoin Denton, Cooke, and Grayson Counties Effect of Aubrey Project on Rays and Estuaries Y have reviewed the U.S. Army Engineer Distrint; Fort Worth, Texas, i reports antAtled y Final Bnvironmental'Im1aot, Stat~emen_t~ AuTey ace Elm Fork, Trinity River, Texas January 312 1974, and' Draft SSuupplem~ent to Final Environmental Statement ubA`.. my aka, e February 1975, 'specifically with regards to evaluative proeedurea,used and conclusions reached aonoeening the effects of the Aubrey Project (Aubrey Reservoir plus Lewisville Reservoir enlargement) on freshwater flows into Trinity The Corps of Engineers concludes that; (1) Average annual flows in the 'trinity River below the City of Dallas 'would be reduced by 116 'cfo. {7} An average annual reduction of 116 ofsin flows recorded at , the Romayor stream gage would represent a reduction of 146 pei++o6nt in the average annual flow into 7!rinity Bay. Flo adverse impacts on estuarine organisms can be directly connected to the Aubrey Project being included in the Trinity River system. I The above conclusions were reached for the pxoject as originally con,oiivedf",wbich consisted of areservoir of 18.7 percent lesser { eapao1t being constructed in the same location as 'the proposed Aubrey j take, with no transfer of flood control storage from Lewisville ; Reservoirs The Draft Supplement concerns itself with changescaused by obnsideration of the larger, ourrently proposed project. The Supplement conoludes; I l t i t i i _ Memo to the Commission April 22, 1976 -2- i I "The net reduction of fresh wator flow Into Trinity Bay resultJhg from the enlarged project will not be a< Significant change from that oaused by the 'original project." I~ It is my con6lu6ion that the evaluative procedures used are aurfibient to support the conclusions reached, and that no significant gains in accuracy nor detail of the effect on the bays and estuaries would likely be,aa, ieved`by further study, I therefore concur with the above statements. 3 r `Thornhill pD Paul_p. '''~tib I. Concur: , l A*X Richardson j I i N ' a .ra i, nx i I 1 I I DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Q~ FORT WORTH DIsTR(CT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P. O. Box 17 300 FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76102 REPLY TO i ArMT10N OIL 12 MAY 1976 F Honorable lJoyd Bentsen United States Senator 912 Federal Building Austin, Texas 78701 i Dear Senator Bentson: , I Z am replyint; to your 1cI'ibY of April 27, 19760 on behalf of Mayor'H.'P. i Bacchus,'_',h'risco, Texas, concerning water rights in the proposed Aubrey i take projecte the'Gorpi of Engineers is responsible for the construction of the Aubrey, `'hake project. 'The issuance of water rights permits and resolution of disputes regarding usage of the water impounded for water supply are the } ' sole,respi?nsib litiea of the State of Texas acting through the Texas Water i 'Commission f F tights"Cot=iasion: On 4 June 1969 the Texas Water Rights designate the cities of Dallas and Denton as; 'local co-sponsors for f negotiatii}n with the federal Government for water supply, storage in the F Aubrey Lalce'p&j ect. Issuance of a water rights permit is required prior to consum4ation of a water, supply, contract. l 1 I In NovembEr 1975 the cities of Dallas and Denton applied to the'Texas 'Water 'Ri.gito Commission for permits for the,water rights in' the projert• At that, t3 ate `various municipalities in the vicinity of the, project requestod,the Texas Water Rights Commission to consider:' their application for water rights in Aubrey,Lake., In view of these additional requests I the xeycas Water Rights Commission withheld the granting of permits for the project pending further study of. area needs and capabilities. The city of Dallas; has also stated that it'owns prior downstream rights in I &1m fork of the Trinity River, a contention that also requires.adjudica- tion by the Texas Water 4ijhsion. 'The Commission hasheld several meetings regardg the water rights 'permits and appropriate ' language that would be involved in the, awarding of permits. No decision 11x6 beao made on the permit's and the cities 'of Dallas and'Denton are> ~S00T10N b/ r ~ l~ 6>>i6.1g16^ • y I r G M } honorable Lloyd Bentoen 12 MAY 1976 1 otill dosignated as'co-eponsore o the prOJact. !Mother meeting; on the matter ie scheduled in Austin on 18 May 1976. ! if Y can be of further assistaizcao ¢leasa call an ma. ! Sincerely youru, i .705 li. $III t32D Colonel, (T Di.atrict Lnginear i Copies furrxiaheds Mr. Robert E. > S shrwidax raecutfvq Director ~ Text Vckt r Mghbs Co miaoion Y. 0+ Box 13207 t Auotia, TX 78711 i Mr• Is Mo Rica, ..Direcxnx ~ ' Da11W Water 04ilitles Departrmentl 500, S. Erwalyr Roos 21U ~ DAllas r; ~ 7520], Mfrs Jizi White E` City Manager' Municipal Wldizrg Daatas ` U76201, +i F i May 19, 1976 4 Mr Frank R. Booth AftorhO at lAw 802 San_ Jiaciato Building Auis.tin. Texas 78701 Re: Aubrey Project Dear Mr., BoO,tht The Comxniasion will cooolder revised orders and pee nit drafts denying all the applications on Aubrey' Reilervair except those of Dallas, and Denton on June S, 19780 at 10:00 40 m. Should you have any questions, piease let us kdoa. V®ry truly yours, r TEXAS WATMt RIG)4T8 COMMISSION t ary a er i eel Moro Jim White City sec City of Denton ;r ai6 East McKinney Denton, Texas 78201 1 1 `i DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FORT WORTH DISTRICT, CORPS CF ENGINEERS P. b, Box 17300 1 FORT WORTH. TCXAS 76102 SWFlD-PC 16 JUN 1976 a Mh`, Jim W. White y City Manager # Municipal Building f _ Denton, Texas 16201 r _ s Dear' Mr. White: i Please refer to your, letter of February 25, 1976 to Mr Frank Tvers of this office concerning the Aubrey Lake water supply contract, Your request ,that Article 5 of the Denton Contract fie worded identical to Article $ .of the 0611as'contract was submitted to our higher authorities for approvel• on 17 May 1976 our Division` Engineer requested furth'ar 3 inforl tion for his review.! Por the Dallas contract, the city of Dallas sub» tted to• us;,a complete explanation as Whow.the city's-water fund operates and th'e'solvency of the system fund based on.prior.experience. f Similar informat,o! is needed from the city of Denton to support your request. About'21 May 1916,.Mr. Ivers talked to your-assistant, Mr. Jack Owen, on the'teleph6e and requested this additional information. We are awaiting this material before we'can, get approval to put the contract in final form and forward it to you for execution. ' Sincerely yours,,...; e 0e, I Colonel, itE District Engineer Q~y0wUTI y t } c~ ~ , ~ rz I ~b>>>61970^~ 1 J w 4 SW CO-hC 2 6 JUN 1978 Mrs Jim' Wv White city ~unloipal DOMton l Too uildn 01 Deer W. Wht to 3 Pieaso refer to yowr letter of February 26, 1976 to Mr Prank lvers of this affire concerning the Aubrey lake water supply Contract, Your r+pwst that. Article 5 of the Denton contract be warded identical to Articl0.6 of the Dallas contract Wks ttbMttted to our hi" for cPp "Al On 17 1975 our Division knyineor authorities !Ma'wNtien for his rev arr. requested further For the Uallas Contract. VW city of Dallas emitted to ua a OWOleta explanation as to how the city's water fond t*s and the solvwKy of the system furrd based an prior ea+ ewCe, 5 11ar iM'arr 1 do Is needed from the city of Dmtlx . to s* t yew llbowt 81 May 1976# Nor. IftM tw1kW to ,y*- a;:1stanto he .ltiW" end fir'. Jack Owen WOW" ~ r do r`eQllested this +rdditlanal lnforveetion. !ie 1~re awaiting this 1100lal befow we can t fog +Ii fbMArd It to xowti+~l to put the oaritract in final you for 4xewtlon. Sim" ly yours, { . ' .r`Mh" ~ 1 f Jot H► SHGARD y Colonel, DE District Engineer r I I 10 TEXAS ' PARIl.;a AND V`.ILDLIFLE' DEPARTMENT i E ,/~.f-- GUfdllig;IU'aGf13 lCI+RCF.lufifli!?V i " BOBHIMIXSON i, I r i,,l I N Temple ; t Cl:airiq,!n, /,uslfu Y JOHN M. Gf;tEN Jt?C K. EUL ON O3 aurnont VlcorCbalrn r,,, Eui)boA; JACK R, GTOUt'. CLAYTON T. GARRISON LGUI$ H. STUNibc l4i FrECLITI VE DIMECT011 Sall Antolilo j Wells t: JOHN H. SC-ALAN BUILDING AUSTIN+TEXAS 78701 July b, 1976 f Culcc:c,, Joe it, Sheard, District Enginoar U., S. Army Corps of Engineers Port office Box 17504 s Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Y s, Deer Colonel ShaarO; t I This letter is to correct an error-conta4.ned in this Department's eorrespondenca to yuu cunceCnitg AubLey Lake which was dated Juno 17, 1976. In thhe secunct se►ter,ce,'last paragraph on page two of Chat letter, it states "...an average ~ dischxz:~e,rate of 57 efs and 101,3.0 acre foet'nf water per year." The amount a°., water t3hould'be 41,^267 acre feet per year, The number of acre' feet per'year for a continuous flow of 140 efs as discussed on page three of the letter was iviadvertently inserted. Please correct your copy of our letter. Thank your your op ration in this matter. Sfn~rrl~, ~ CtAii ' $ + SON ; Exe~ti e Director Cx Spm Co. , U. S Fish and Wildlife Service City of Dallas city of Deaton i I L I E r DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FORT WORTH 6STRICT, CORP$ OF ENGINEERS P. 0. BOX 17$00 F(>nT WORTH. TEXAS 76102 i Aatirro SWFIID~R~ , z Q JUL 1978 Mr. Qwrlos n~ Yrovlss pf rrettar 8*6t and P l aft" l nq Of f i w fffI" #f ;the itovarrwr .-~1 f ~t ` l~tfti "fttrlMiik Ault fh,. Tcas ' 't87Q1 f aw Mr. Troviss M► Itttar rstad 17 .tuna 1976, Mr, Cipyton T. Wrrrison Taws.terks OW Vildiffs D6P4rb*Mt, exprsssed his kxac4tlva Rfra4two rnf~ flow wlaalia; falattarn; from tlri p•rtmont S of4►v A o!' Mr. arrriion lattdr I, ! to Prot►as~d Aulrroy isj" prof' . a R*d fFir your aoewanfsnsa. f n1M wM r 1141pA'ts C6"10* loo! r'apr }+int f >1te ef.Tom to oft use Of tur4a4a votorr f0ir the ~arve4 j~+~r~"~ f his OiM del +el too of t l of 0411.14 Dn,t I's lwia! , I~+entww0. ttor+ sew i n # ►ra i,,alsa.. ' ~ ►!K+rs flir ' the ryN'rd, th oit~ , i a>s tfw ~SIN'fi"I tod at ~ fn this d tf+r► t f t!t0 paaw, ais tlia -sa},pu►u t r of ret i aelF lea WIN . 40 ~fat~►. efut nMd .fer tt,m+aup` wtter ral ~iMlMrtirotiah storm to MInrN Ndvsr#l.pr'aat.+NMid off Atha. y >h~#t auto Our r bf 1 tY t nflof, tho d0w~tr ; ate. y f , t+! w » ueta• th# 'r1 tai r wa r~ . ter; tuf'M4M1t >;tali~1"Wiiuia! r iae►s iar~d '1►1 tgia># olab+r,i 11+►TIt11M'f1", tfM 164,1441W Ion t , ` tato t witar.ra>11araas. '►h s>t t 1+M prlO t ei atMr tl>wn t ! 11 i t . ai rdl~,al~star to an LO~+~'~04 + y.~kAt ~ j ~,pwm ~ia~ +u~!o~w h«~ # +tffo4str4 : r* t ..w► f pe►t 1¢y In r i~rd .0 tli ' AE,i~itda►. d' oa . pf ""f' pro"i f' (I" I of flow Cbr >rl1 fttf ar. rst y~ t~'erlAIM ` )Vp a pof ICY Mo>lft'60 fray tM state in,~' and xo ry :;'t C .w,~r y 1F thaw r•liwu>M~I: I I` SWF'6~-I►It 2 0 JUL 1179 a Mr. Chartas D, Travis 1 y rssponss will Your coordination with the atf'satsd $tatr 09004 1" and raft wr s~pprsclatsd 5l naarsl y 'yourt, i Inat CHAIt1.~8 J 1'RACy As statdd AoctI Ce Acting District 9n4inssr tol►iss tW ~It~Mdt Mr. Clsytan T, Qlarrlson i tlw olrector Tex" Parks aw WOO* Department 1 H, FASO M Building Awtia, T *08 78701 Mr. ~s K, Doss go"tl" piraator i board T«as water D+wel ooftnt station i'R Iwc i7. Aaalkir, ~'soc+~ ' 7,~1 i lk. It. WAS ar Itt1w► pirattar Caxas tlrtor Rights Cawis;<la 00 lac 1007 Awt I p, -tows 78711 ilrer,,1 al Ii Vlcas. .010r C f~ i~ra~ ~iiatit'~► s.rwra► ji! Toyliw stoat ►art *rth« 7ax4s 7610 . 14r, i « M. It i ass ? 011'+►i►>ar, ikitra► Watisr Utliiti► s« IlrVnt i iss« Ts~cas 75277 r P4r~ ,IaN1H M.' 1lhits i ~ ~ City MN1~Oat' - . city 9 >santa# . Muala3tr+~1 RWt1di►+q' mtm Tog" 76201 2 . j.:.G.'_p..{..• Sri. '.hh. I 1 TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT RtEC0MmMATIONS FOR AUBREY LAKE RELEASES, OCTOBER* 1976 -t ;.rr 1 . Some controversy 6pparently still exists in regard to the.firm yield of Aubrey Take. It is our understanding that this controversy stems from ; prior water rights for Lewisville' Lake, which are in excess of its firm yield, and over systems management with Aubrey Lake. As the construction ~ agency, the Corps of Engineers calculated the firm yield of Aubrey Lake to be 152 cubic feet/second (98,088,184 gallons/day) under 1985 conditions i I and 139 cubic feet/second (89,838,063 gallons/day) under 2085 conditions. These are the firm yield figures in the authorization document submitted i to Congress by the Corps of Engineers and found acceptable to the City of Denton and-the Texas Water Rights Commission. The recommendation by this j Department for a'15 cubic feet/second continuous base flow as well as for a'variable soasonai flow regime of 15 cubic,feet/second from December l - 14, x.40 cubic feet/second from February 15 - May 310 and 25 cubic February feet/second from June 1 - November 30 would require conside'rabl'y less water than the firm yield of Aubrey Lake. A'continuous flow of 140 cubic feet/ seeond,.recom®ended by this Department 'as desirable, would be only 1 cubic } foot/second higher than the fist yield under projected 2085 conditions but 1 ~ could probably be provided in most years up until that time. The expected occurrence of spills from Aubrey Dam and the period of highest water use by Dallam and Denton coincide with the period when higher continuous flows are desirable for fish spawning and recreation. c j a ~ ~ sIP•: rr>. aN., 1.:-4e wail ~F7%h. {cc ah ='iiA. -phi:s'~ dales water ut*tws 600 S. Ervay - Dallas, Texas 76277 # (214) 746-9711 November 24, 1976 Mr. -Jim W. White, City Manager Qty of Denton 215 East McKinney Street Denton, Texas' 76201 j Dear Mr, White; a 1 The study commissioned by the Dallas City Council to determine the coat of providing ? water and sower service is nearing completion, A draft of the summary.of findings and conclusions is scheduled for delivery by Turner, Collie & Braden, who are the prime contractors for the study, on December 1, The concerns in the cost of service study are the potable, water service and the sewerage service provided l by'the City through the Dallas Water Utilities to both its insilte city and outside city customers. A briefing on the summary report by the consultant has been scheduled for December 3 for the benefit of both the water and sewer client cities and the Dallas Water Utilities staff, Although much of the material will not concern your city, attendance at the briefing would give you insight as to the manner in which the consultants address the problem of allocating and financing reservoir storage capacity. This' subject was addressed at a previous briefing.;sm September 30, and I am enclosing a copy of the briefing material which was distriuuted at that meeting. It is not my thought that we would be in position to discuss possible rate adjustments or changes in contract provisions with you on December 3. This would be accomplished` at a"subsequent meeting between your representatives and ours. The pr'.sary purpose of this meeting will be to gain an understanding: of the consultant's appreciation i of the factora controlling cost of service and their associated prices. -I The meeting is scheduled to bo held at 9100 a.m., December-3, ~ 1976 at the Rams1a ' Inn, -1011 S. ,Akard, Dallas, Texas in Lxecu~ t~ve~~s T -a' 3. A reservation fora, i location mop, and proposed agenda are enclosed for your convenience, Please return the completed reservation form in the self-addressed envelope on or before December 1 1976.; I look forward to meeting with you on December 3, 1976. If you should have any at (214) 748-9711, extension 341. I questions please call tie ii I Sincerely yours, V11rLr Dir6~ torCe NOV 2 g 1976 IMtt:lk ury oi- DENTON jY1ANAGLR'S OFFICE Eno, i / I A city utility providing Dallas with water purification and dlstrlbutlon, waste water collection and treatment 1 F r I t : Date: S' Fcom: To: 1''. M. Rice, Director F Dallas Water Utilities Suite 201-A i'. 500 South Ervay` Dallas, Texas ;$277 Consultant's Executive Summary Report of the Water Cost of Service Subject: + Study . j e 31i(not be able to attend the scheduled`briefing an the Consultant's ,j I will/w Study to be held- Summary Report of the Water Cost of Service OR1 Friday, December 1976 at: 9:00 am. In: Executive Rooms ? `3 Ramada Inn Convention Center F 1011 South Akard D Ilas, Texas i t 7 ' I Phan/do not plan to bring 'a guest. A T T E N D AN C E 1 N F 0 R M A 7 1 0 N Re,~resent 1 n T 1- Name i t i Signed: , y 1 j DALLAS, TEXASDALLAS, TEXAS f CONVVNTION CENTER CONVENTION CENTER N ADA114 t'elephone 214-051.1089 ~N ~rEt!~x f r i 7. .r ~ 'r .^rrin.,.,, j I } r-T I , ,'4 n• z i ~ 1 , tit F~ ~ S -t J .1555 _,hFfT~ '.Q, it .lit ~q arc 14 Jlr.d 1 bir> `1+i`l' I~~i •'.71 .ii X70'0." I ~ t , w l rl ! , y yi a .rrpp.~ (p~1'E f4 'i f 4 E II "Lf/ il~~ ~I1 k.itill.w 1 I .1.. 1 OOM!' flt ~ _,,R ~ •a t. `4•:' r r ~~h Iltlil i~' n ' F 9 7ST'P 1K , nor 1101 ._,.".r' ~ ~ 1 ~ /JF~►i.. .w r I , ~ ,t1,~ ~ I ~ 5, F `rf talv,N1 d ' , , CENtER ' r~ . Ill It 1111n1 i of Dullna - u}~ 141 lL~I}~t!'! t l L> I 1~ h ~ ~b i(Tt Cj lllui , 1i f3gU.t }~Cknol. lip 1x51 rVnilon§ n on kumada nn woYlc!• , le Ny A ~ M wlcla - cn~l o!l•frno 000.220.207.(1, Your I rnvcl Agehl Is;~i ~/iY 1 1 ~ - :.r1C.? 1,~ r,4,1~ryv }n~~~r ~1lr:~'T'` r,- lrpa `\PtTl~4,l~ 1 0! 5 vl S Jr?'y~rr(' w~,[r~~~flnr ~~1~~Nfi? t~~S ),A r 7 ,if 17, 4rk i 1t 1. R t11rr + 1, . ;l.r ar1t. .Cv }.1 ,,y'f Lt,l, v G kT'`t ,''r:ti '~I ' Irlj{t-s' Y , Inr., y~ ~t Opr.Y,llnll by r'iltlro Inns Milw1 ollicill Cloolilnl 4 ` I 1, MILL _ 1IA-I1-0 A966MAfd MONY16tLL0 N.Y 6 MIAMI 19ACN' y+~ M M ,1 t1 . : I PROPOSED AGENDA r Dallas Water'Utilitles Water Customer Cities Workshop r; } Decemb*r 3,191b 3 1. Introductory Remarks - I. M, Rice ' 11. EXecutive Summary Report of Water Cost of" Service Study. Turner, Collie b Braden, Inc. ii1 Discussion Period - Turner,Colfie 6 Braden, inc. j IV; Future, Action A.'! Response by Customer Cities I. M.: Rice Timetable for Rate Proposal I. M. Rice F ' l i i s , ne W. n f Figure I r, ~1 4 Study Approach yw~M TIto IPIMd ►M S •IM11M Wffisow lYdl 1 : 1 few ' SY+INn CrarM no" it NN Ys/ f Owo"Por e.M"m ~ s+« rw e.a s... f its" Mw I~ ZF or* to o" - fame ~ t Maa+I 4f met," so t:*ww I, • , W1RM 1y~ drraNrlMk glen r~ NN INei AlbCatNd ,CaullMln =UM l!<; i w Root aIMI Clow" poll" tY! i 1){. wow A"~ M1aM~ M.N I ov~ I'l~lkm r, I ` le"O Dow V06 too" WMW Owr SMYIM C40008001 I t C"b."4 Comw Too IndulxV~i tat 119eerky lln+I MhoN - !~w« , `iii 1 r Work Tter Completed Work Item in Progress tit. q: a+2~ . ..,t<):f11 1 t.F. ; L ' k n` (~1Turnez, Conte & Braden f 9-76 i DALLAS WATER UTILITIES ALLOCATION OF WATER SUPPLIES f Jf , Elm Fork Supper Svstpm 'Y ield-1 l 8 MGD - Customer j Customer City City i f 1 DAlla s Inner City Customers Fast Side .Supply' aystexzx Yield-330 MOD { I Customer city Cu or ! r City. € All Reservoirs 448 MOD ~ rptal Yield X99? Demand* - Dallas 262 11 1 Customer Cities 186 ~w . r...... Total 448 MGD r i According to Palestine Hearing Exhibits . r j s ' r1urner, Collie be Braden 9-7b L DALLAS WATER UT'ILIT'IES CUSTOMER CITY PREDICTllSNS AT PALESTINE HEARINGS ~ of I 1997 Customer Allocated r'1~ ! City Population City Total Yield-MGD ! t Addison 10 200 1. 27 1.934' Balch Springs 17000 2014 36255 Carrollton 6, 000 9050 14.433 Cedar Hill 4~1, 500 5.31 8.072 Cockreu Hill 4;900 0.61 0.930 Coppaxl 42, GU0 5.32. 8.091 De Soto 32, 200 4.03 ' 6o i-19', r Duncanville 34,.840 4.34 64603 armer's Branch 56,900 7011 10.847 My'laWer'Mound x4.900 5.05 7.66,9 (3) Grand Prairie 123, 300 15.43 239 435 • Hutchins A, 60" 0181 06781 Irving 2050000 25.65 386967. Klebeig 110100 1.38 26142 i JAaAcaster 76'600 9.57 14.545 1 ! (2 mesquite 90,300 (2)R chardson 490 400 w.. Seagoville l3, 600 1.70 2.585" k ;I (21Sunriyvale 180 200 Wilmer 8, 600 1108 1.637 ; r 1`51~q t E , ~ f (1)_ Present Customer but not at time of Palestine hearing. (2),, Customer at time of Palestine hearing but not anticipated to be'in 19976 (3) 1/3 of population eliminaked to adjuAt for Tarrant County portion trot being served; Pa t, t =.ai a t':1:lC+:yry4-.,y,'• h1'r. ..t .c.. , . , ✓....e i, A d.. ^Y -.40 i c.*rtt(?. »1€ i~T rt;1',[•'11f'liif~'1 k h t - Attachment 1 LON.,UtTIN16 EfVGI!\'EERS 4 . i September 20, 1976 Mr. I M. Rice, Director Dallas Water; Utilities 500 South Ervay Street Dallas, Texas 75277 } SubJecti Dallas Water Utilities" Cost of Service Study Dear Mr. Rice: Du ring "the early stages,of the Cost of'Service Study for Dallas Water Utilities, j a workshop was held with the Customer Cities to explain the process for such.a;• study and to solicl't their input into elements of the basic data. At that meet- ing, it was agreed.thit.an additional workshop would"be held about,October 1. Before di-scussing with these C ties what our preliminary conclusions are, it was s felt that the Dallas City Council and you should be apprised of these matters. 1 While It was not Intended that this study should address the legal positions of the parties involved in the matter-of complaint filed by the,Citles of.fatmers E F. Branch and Grand Prairie vs. the City of patios before; the Texas Water Rights Commission, fi ,t.s impassible to perform a:co$t of services study without apply- i ng certbih basic concepts which.are`at Issue in that complaint. each basic.tancept decon has been considered at length by. our firm. We"belieyo'that each such . ! decision is logical and a fair application of rate making principles, though 'in some cases the concept we have applied was not advocated by either the Petitioners or the City of Dallas Without going into a lengthly discussion of the entire rate-making process, of Into all of the basic decisions, required in such astudy, a few of the most j significant elements of this study are as _follows: 1 ~ .1. METHODOLOGY ItIs our opinion that, where a governmental entity is furnlshl'ng utility service to outside customers as well 'as to its own citizens, i the.most equitable method of determining cost of service Is through' ` the Utility Basis of rate making. i► t E y 1 f L! •1P 1} +I iI tj, •I 1}s1,11; 1C~.t17 `tI11 i, r.,. 51,E '1~. :.\i i. 1J~S~tS``• ~ nlii.~t . f I k i 10 { 6 Hr. 1. H. Rice k September 240 1976 Page 2 i ~ RATE BASE DE'fERM_fNA7i0k u 2. s our opini-o-n for some time that the proper method for . hod 'for determining been the rate base, on o which m return on e investment Is.cal- culated, is on the "fair Value" of the system, The requirement for use of this method In Article 6, Section 41 of the public Utility Regulatory Act, 64th Legislature, reinforces this opinion., s The method of arriving'at `the Fair Value Rate Base used in this study Is'consistent with that provided by the regulations issued by the Public Utility Commission of Texas. 3. RETURN ON INVESTMENT e recommend that the return on investment be determined by threes factors: (a) the embedded debt' interest rate`'on outstanding bonds, (b) the interest rate which could be expectod in the current ma'rkCt I to reflnanc%~ the egmity capital In the system, and (c) the coverage required above the totals of these two into rest requirements to main- Wh the `financial l'ntegrl ty of the system, Preliminary indications are that the ovetall' affect."of this method will result in a rates of # return of approxlma*ely seven percent. ; i 4. ALLOCATION OF WATER SUPPLIES f ' Our understand ng o the record before thei Water Rights Commission , is that Dallas made no representation to the Commission regarding # supplying water to Customer Cities prior to the City of Dallas'' ' application for Lake Tawakoni (granted 10 December 1955). There- i fore, the water: rights obtained prior to Tawakoni were obtained for the use of the City of Dallas. He, therefore, believe that it Is `reasonable to allocate the yield of` the Elm Fork Reservolr System and Its re ated costs to the.inner City i customers and to distribute the yield of the East Side Reservoir System and Its related costs between the inner city customers and the Customer Cities, The alternative to such an allocation would be to require inner city customers to pay higher rates for new supplies to replace those Elm Fork supplies being used by the Customer Cities, though Dallas apparently `did not acquire the Elm Fork supplies for such Customer Cities, nor did the Commission grant the rights under such an understanding. In order to obtain a basis to allocate the yield of the East Side Reservolr System between the Customer Cities and Dallas, we used 014 exhitilts contained in the Lake Palestine hearing (permit granted 5 Aprll'1972), Those exhibits anticipated that, when the total f reservoir yield was needed to satisfy demands', the Customer Cities i wound require 186 million gallons per day (mgd) of yield. However, this predicted requirement included the Cities of Mesquite and 1 9 i I Mr. I. M. Rice September 20,, 1976 3 p Page 3 Richardson as well as the entire City of Grand Prairie. After adjustments for the, withdrawal of Mesquite and Richardson, the elimination of the Tarrant County portion of Grand Prairie and the addition of Flower Mound, the 186 mgd originally shown for Customer Cities in the Palestine hearing exhibits becomes approx, Imately:151 mgd. Much of the difference between the Dallas position and the osition' o the Petitioner s n the resent com is nt revolves around the Y quest ono how, much o the cost''o cart in' uture water supplies should be borne b the Cust msr,Clt es and how much b :the Qa as. cifize ns. i t vi i i be our proposal that each C Y. determl. Y ,977r the portion of- water su ly It ware for tsved ~ for, Its future needs and provide for payment pp y 'arts rese through rates for such ; reserved capacity. We wit suggest that the:C.'ty of Dallas offer to i j reserve.' for the life of the supply In question, that portion of.tha. ' . East Side Supply's yield which was represented in 'the Palestine hearing I for each,Customer City up to the amount so indicated by the, City. ),,n return for the, City of Dallas reserving this`yteld, the Customo CIty i" would be expected to commit and to pay;arato for"such portion'of the rase C ! t of i the o s 151 - , m dhcant be aI located C-1 ty accorddIni tmen hued, the k cos g g to those n,ents. , coh" We further recommend that these commitments be made by Resolutions ! apprbved by the appropriate governing body. ' 54 WATER RATE STRUCTURE though we cannot yet determine what rate will be required for ! i. Customer Cities In order to yield the return discussed In-3 above, we are In a position to describe the type of rate structure We In- tend to recommend. This rate, structure consists of a Volurt.3t'6arge and a Capacity Charge as provided In the existing Customer City R contracts. The Volume Charge will cover only those items of cost which vary directly with the quantity of water delivered--primarily electric ; porter and chemicals. t E The Capacity Charge will be comprised of three a:'ments, each element covering the costs related to that element: a. Reservoir Capacity Charge - As previously, montloned, I ' reservoir capacity will be allocated based on each of the Customer Cities own commitment for.reserve supply. i ! r i A r r°`3 E t September 20, 976 Mr: 1. M, Rice Page b. Maximum Day Capacity,Charge - All`troatment and trans- portation`factIIties in the system will be Al located to 1 customers based on the relative demands on the maximum day of the ~e:gr c Peaking Capacity Charge - All pump ng, storage and other, faeliitles in, the system considered to be for the'00i_pose of providing peaking demand above the average rate of the maximum day will be allocated to customers based on the rate of such p~aking. There'are, of course, many other matters involved in'the, rate design, however these,seem to be the key issues of which; the Dallas Councti should be made i aware, These O'ti0s should not be construed as~evfdence that they have been approved , by the Dallis Council or that they will lie adopted* They are only the°tonsultant's pr®liminary conclusions and should'be regarded as just that. The guidance of.'the Dallas City Council and that of all Customer Cities are solicited In this endeavor. We will be aval li0e to provide more data IIad explanations of any of these matters aYyour.convenience. Yours very truly, i TURNER.. COLLIE 6 SWEN, INC. r i Wm. R, Ratliff, Is. E. Senior Vice President I k k i . 1 ; 1 1 y ! f ~ i k i M r E_ ft DallasWater UtIlitles Customer Cities - Water s Projected Demand Forecasts i f, f ~ Year Description 197 1977 197,_ 9a 164 36.896 37.840 32.857 34.254 Average day demand in MGD 35. t Maximum day demand in MGD 92•t53 94.018 93.423 91.828 95.734 ,r Note: The City of•Richardson's water dcmends gradually decrease from 1$76 throuq'h 1978 to .3 point of no water withdrav~als in 1979. ,s k i i w ! 1 , ~ I ..f..hf.„kstw (E f i r Attachment 2.6 Dallas Water Utilities +;f acitY of 'Customer Cities - Wq+ter Supply is Pro)ected Reserve Cap G'; 3 ~ . ~ Reserve Capa.lty ~ In r Cit HGD 4 s 1.9344 Addison 3.2550 Salth springs a r 14.436 catirol l ton' Hlll 8.0774 cedar a .9309 Cockrell Hill 8.0910 Coppell ; 611194 De$oto t 6.6030 buncanyille 10.8066 Farmers Branch 7.6692 Ftower Mou.id F' ~t' 6ra~id Prairle 73.4353 .7$12- Hutchins lrvin9 ?8,9670 S 2.101 i Kleberg 14.5452 Lancaster 2,5854 Seagoville 1 1.6 68 wilmer ` Total 151.9613 i r r 1 ~ r ~ , r ...I ..1 f , +1 : .r r r rL n- e. r v. . Attachmont 3` ,4.rtJ4r :.{}r WATER OPN!4ATIONS 4140 MIkINTEVdPICk 10 tit .a>h+ hALLAS WATER OTP.IT IIES GRn4JTH AlaO tWP4ATlON FACYrJkS ,;pUY OATE v/1R/7h 11975 1001 ~>a4 GR400* 1978 *40* a4a44 197-4 a~wv a4+++ +ylYrl,AT:14N 1976 1977 00H INFLATION (;hnwlH 1NfLATtnN ii'4U!i^' sr~aaagaao INE ITFr4 4'yM~Y~Y4~d # AM# 12=.~ OESfRIPTIf)NS 0OWTH INFLATION GROWTH, INpLATIO 0 100.4 10500 102,0- 11040 10248 116,0 10208. 121. 10x•% WARES ANO iAt,AR1ES t400 b gUaPLIES 107.0 115.0 104.1 12:1.0 11014 1,32.0 li}aLh 14J.1I 4:~ ICE'c))pP.lES 106.1 107.4 to1.7 1?3.0 103.t 131.0 QhM.O f0 MfY1)A TMI. OgA.y 147.0 10002 115,0 06%,5 yh7,o 067.7 182.4 1 . 1Y.Y 1c C►4ENtCA'.i 144.3, Moo 9614,2 Woo 1 106.E 107. 0 107,0 115.0 104,1 123.0 110,8 132.!3 OhJ•y , HYsRRn Pn,STarp 104.1 107_:0 07964 115'.0 UN041 12300 OA0.1 132.0 111.ti 1~* 0 y 4THKR SUPP41E5 111.7 111«0. 112.7 - 12200 113.8 132.0 110.7 1410 ~`J4AtNTENANCE hF STRUCTURES «y f' MAINTENANCK-OF M1IPMENT ,1 131•.0 104.'1 14.1. t) 1Ai*T ' ' 10`,06 131 •Q 105.1 14A;0 Ma,1nA TflntS► 1!aCHINEAY 105.2 lldi5 145.6 121.0 106 WIMAVORKS.MAINS• 145.6 11,065 106.8 12140 6,w4 tSETERS 103.8 110.5 104,3< 121.'0 104.A 131,0 105.9 140,0 •0 1~J.a Sp.RViCE'C.,ONI+EC'YtONS 04445 116.5 487.2 121.0 07q.9 131:d 9'12.9 14000 G6.a ls3r~ 11202 11005 124.6 121,0 136.6 131.4 14R.ts 140.0 ' tti1 F1R6 HYORANTS 103.9 11005 104.3 121.0 104.8 1 1.0 10 .4 14G.0 t;. ' bTHeR MAINY. UouIPNENT MISCELLANhI'IS S6RVIC95 ? .0 .172.1 12 ►.A kn4.3# 12460 lAl>.t1 131.0 SII~P~NT; RPNTA~. 103#4 tAb•5 109.h 11490 11544 17 1 A lop. Ct}hTRACTS 1}00.0 107.0 1000115«0 1 f). 0 Ay7• URHY Ann Ph4PK 1d5.6 14000 .186.1 1 175,60 1,06.7 201~ss 1Rti.2• .O 'I ; 2 116.0 097.2 124.0 d4i.2 131vOr ! fflop 09'1.1` '107.4. Oy'f. Cf1MW,.' E 1jIpM9N'T .>IENTAL 103.2 107.0 102.7 ` 116.0 1611 124.11 10~•n 1k1 0 GflMP11TE#i SEAvIevs 106.0 16760 10064 116 0 10040 124.0 1RA.0 1*jL~0 pRnP9S 1Q`'AL SERVICES 100.0 t24.0 104.0 1:11,0 1 v,A~aT: 140.0 1070 100.0 116,0 RR HISC. SERVICES 143.4 ' 10740 166.4 •1160!` 109.5 124,u 111.6 131,!s 1_ . 6TH,, Og7.2 121.0 Phi. x7.4, SUN?Kr 097.2 103.0 b97*? 110.4 097.2 116.0 14Y.2 121 , t. PF.1 S1Cih5 X47.6 105:0 11Rr0 11'0..0 128.4 11640 138•K 121.0 127 f INS4141AMC♦? 100.0 10540 1020 1100 105.4 116.0 l0sl.1 121. ,0 110+46 . bTHER 511N1)1%Y IYEMS 4L, 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 10000 100.0 100.0 100.0 10006; > COST ALLOCATSON ;$YUf1Y 1 ; , F F , j•~ . 1 1 ' I. ~ _ n,e~a. a.;....rwa,Ywrx ....c .s~}~; ~}iiil•~7'yel~a.% u.u ~ ► f ' at tachnl0WE . 4'.A m{,1,IvS WATER°11T1LtTtE3 NA7sf1 ¢P~kA Ii1N5 AND MAtNTENANGB MAf,t NrI. + ,IfAtF 9113/7 6 t3RRNYK ANq fNPI,ATtpk PROJECTIONS I IN YH011SANDS I t ra 197'1 dv iA !'lAd . { rM; " ,,u ,1477 w~ 1974 ploij 2x. { to ifAYEk 11Y LINE tYFM *9 1475 +w ~ i47A PRUJr kXY. VkIIJ. EXP. RF.SCR1PTinNS ' RASE YR Vk4J• f?XPr P1tOJr CKP• tp~y1 .l "9376 9t4hh 10~39b r+ 'VAAFS ANA SALARIES Nr397 arRll sI ? I1 SIIPPL F$ 201 217 x~t{ OFF1C'i SOPPLIRS 16?„ IH3 t44 1Ny XIh trl 14+7 1 r Th7' NtMnk,;ThnLS 159`'' 1r95rt i,53h 3+.10 E - CIrPr+If,,A.4$ at5b4 340 415 4b0 MFT5R6fT, PptTr1RE 33 77, 5 q0 b7 7i %5 C)YHPR`S1SPPliES ` 20404 20704 2.44h WAR ~w TnTAt 511PPLIES 2.282 1414 _645 714 7k4 ; ya1NT8NANrw tip, 5Yat1fYUAeS $21 , AA t4tF,MANCF DF Fi1111`PHF,NT 22l 245 ?hh ?74 14A,InR 1(100 `MAf.HINERY 191 25's 2h9 236 wATFRW(1RKS MAIN4 I57 th5 72 k5 Ht~sRS 241 73+ 'Y 40 243 SfRV1CR C11NN!!CTIONS 1230 2 35 16? 203 24P ?11 F I AV WYO'AANY S H H 11 11 yy h7H,,R hAtN7♦ <spIIIPMENT' 1000 IilSN $NANCE nF fg1tI'MENT 604 TOTAL KAOT Y. NtSC>k~'LAt~Pp►IS SEgVtI:ES Al) 14'iN ►'•u{il If 1<09INti.FNT RENTAL 1041 7~5 g51 371 t 2149 303214 tth44 r 30373 Zf1MTNA't75'., 3" 112 ►4'S1 2r 144 79 k4" 1LIAWT. AMO'.POW4A 15 " by 4,,' t3 AU 1 "NEN`t" 4tiFNTAl, bfi 331 I87 ` . COMM 54 399 2q3 ' 2 com01IFR S~ItK S~ 343 1914 193 ?.7?" Nyn1:,k$116 AL SFkVICES 3h2 294 76 21)9 4 R>:MY 391 438 4141 yI~ s 353 nYrRa Mts~: `Fa,1tvlCts SCti ri0y hrl?i iy t 4r 179 5►Oh0 5 1 jiSTeL ►'ILLANEn11S S.ERVIC6S 3,415 77M ) i` ttjNhRY 707 740% i< ¢b? 671 249 S PENSIONS 1h7 192 2110 ~tt111L I?~Sl10tA C@ 149`' 1,114 1tz04 10304 1t394 P dT►+6R SttNdaY- 1taMS 1.0b6 I ; 2,21+9 20421 2 1[ 1,117b 1.4A1 2010 TOTAL WNW 43h 11001 1.0ht lrtll , i►3a7 I GnSt"ALLnCATI 10117 ON STUDY :h. y. 21.602 23,62y ?4ty17 180652 209666 ~,„yI1TAL WATER ( ,oMN4?kAtiHV".VA40 rt,N"AUMIMAS.X .Y ,,.:A4lY(MuM1A\Wt*rr .r e` I~µ~p;Apy+'Nkfdn°~. .w:u h f , 10 'Aktadnmek -a-is I Dallas Water Utititles Base Year And Projected Operation and Maintenance Expense - Water ($000 Omitted) i i ' Base j a Year Projected Function 1975 197 1277 1975 = 980 i Supply reservoirs' $ 1455 $ 1;476 $ 1,435 $ 1,553 $ 1,0629 $ 1,7111 Raw water transmission ' 8.42 1038 1,207 1,353 1,446 1,519 's Purification 4,387 50045 4,866 50402 5,758 6,212 ii Treated water, transmission 1000 1,360 1,578 1,770 1,893 20066 Treated Watbr.distrlbutlan 4,795 5>2$9 59785 4,334 69737 7,236 Meter reading and repair 2,532 2,`669 2►E;57 3066 30226 3,422 I Customer service 1034 2,0079 2,229 2,390 2,515 2,650 { E1691naer1n90 admin~stratEon a"I 'atha 1 07 J1 0 11645 1,661 I 1~,84$ Tata1. $18,652 $20,666 521,602 $23529 $24.9917 '`126,754 egwaasou rwwr~rr irrrr+rr: rars+isrr4 rYmslaraa ssrrsrr~a, ,c • It{ 1 . 1. i . 'Y i, a , ? DDIAF ,f CITY OF DALLAS f October 21, 1977 > Honorable James M. Collins Washington burnDHo. C. 020515 Building Dear Congressman Collins: ' One of the.two questions .in your recent letter relates''to starting c- land acquisition at Lake Aubrey, This, of course, hi'np~< on the i ' Cities of Dallas and Benton signing"contracts with thl Csrps of_. Engineers for water 'SUpply and recreation at lake Aubt:rj. When a permit for, Lake Aubrey was. issued to Datl6s by the Texas Water i Rights 'Co0mIssion,.it was With a statement to the record, to the Cohro ssion that the. City,Of,Dallas probably would not authorize" ;y + execution of these contracts until 1, The rate complaint brought by,Farmers Branch and Grand Pnairie against.p.allas was concluded satisfactorily (The Texas' Water' Rights Commission' order in this. case has been appealed by both plaintiffs and the respondent J to State District Court. No trial date has been seta) 2. .Based on the outcome of this rate case and another case ubsequently filed by. Farmers Branch, Dallas had re-evaTuated its-role is an area water supplier. And, ' 3.` The economic feasibiTit of "the Aubre . ro; y y p sect was're.examined. (This is underway with,a report expected later this fall:) Meatfwhile, the City of Crisco has sued the Texas Water` Rights Commission ller. ''d tb v4 d the,Commission'a action fn granting a permit for.Lake Aubrey'to Dallas and Denton, The, preliminary` hearing was held 060ber.1,3, ' Qb-. ~ viously, Dallas would not be _in' d' position' to proceed with''the'Aubrey .c project until the Frisco suit ha's been solved.. It is .regrettable that t cannot be more positively responsive to your inquiry; but, it . f zr is important for all to realize that the City of baths finds. itself in a position wh{ere its'freedum td act is restricted by litigation instituted by others. Until this litigation can be resolved, the prognosi for the Aubrey project appears to be one of continued delay. S i n c y, 1 1~~ R. Schrader f; t Ma ages qC { 2 1977 sv ti,. cc. hris Hartung, City'ManagerL./' XAMMMM ~A AGER'S OEFIC~ . 1!t banto T crtY►uu nwasrrUuszszo, re«aHaW 214 114"111 r. , ,~l,Mr 1 Wrru 1 Z~ ~d`:^•~ y3}rr~.•.ty }(fp.i k' 1±x L.V„ t# . _ ,b5.5.5M1 „ ....,.y„ - p1-. ~~j 4 1 YwY~rrrev I offices 1 BOOTH. LLOYD AND "MONg - ROB, SAN JACIN74 iUILOINq~ . AUSTIN. TEXAS 74701 ' TRLR}HONK (IlIRI 47i.0506 IpIIANK p. 6007H ItoiciptT H. LLOYD 1977 LUTOHRH i, S'MMONf November NOV 11 1977' JAM96 A. SANNKROT MOORIIT (MOO) L. LOONRY CIlY U "'M . RAM 1 Alexander Grant & Company k certified Public Accountants One Main' Place ! Dallas,.TexaG 75250 n City rf Re: Denton l Gentlement We have been requested to provide you with certain V~ our representation of the City Of information concerning Dento n ! in,ah appal from an order We represent the City i ty permits Nos. 1706p and 3312 to Theap apppe e ervoir. aal , gra:►tnq the Ci ro oEed Aubrey ge pa,s s s ion } Driate water, frb1a p p 1 Cit Me co vexar attCqurt osTis entitled of \:D st 1 y cause No. 25 ► County'► Texas . - i f Denton: in the Ad9 u the di , ! Basin, TOXast i We'also represen~l`thetUpper Trinity. , Cation O"ater Rights in ~W4te.r CI „which is pendinc3 before the Texas e,ter,,annddipi rityxof, ! case will 'determine the validity,ro riate water from the City' Is Permit'No. 1706 to app p Reservoir. Lewisville ellate, Courts wi117Osustain 6A and 3312 Iri our opinion, the App permits ryas. ~ the Commi,sgiori's order granting perrait No. 17 q•& is i to'the~C ty. Xh our opinion the City's a valid water permit. other, legal matter iti.which 'We have no knowledge of any ed to the Cityby i k City be involved• 'All fees bilk t the y aid, this firm are currently p Very truly ypurs,' r R. gooth Frank FRg:sc boo: Chris Hortung 3 I ~ .i'e...i 1 1`1.x. 4. . .(Fa ?Sjr.. T'V44~ r. "v:e" krt 11i'L_~nv.t. A,\;QV hex 1 1 II ~h z. TEXAS DEPARTMEN'T' OF WATER RESOURCES r} 1700 N, Congress Avenue" Austin, Texas y t; a ® TEXAS WATER COMMISSION { TPXAS WATT ]k DEVELOPMENT BOARD) r T Joe D, Carter,Chai;man , I„ Black, Chairman A Robert B, Gilmore,Vicc Chairman Dorsey B. Hardemarl 0 Joe R. Carroll Milton T, Potts r John H,IGarrett Harvey Davis George W: McCleskey Executive director I Glen E. Roney August L, 1978 City of Denton CE;R!l+ VIED MAIL i Municipal Building ' DeiDton, Texas 76201 , ~ c3enfrleme>ii: Construction Provisions 1 V rte e 1 pp i.ca on:No. 3528 Pe'r'mit No. 3312 li hewisville Lake Application NQ.' 1590 (A) I k"e rmi t No,, 17061A} Today's letter is to remind you that the tiri+eitisnS~p ur r construction on the referenced projects the start le 1,1978: Yf";;+ orTt cannot. bd started by this deadline date, you should., The request fax an extension ~ apply foi: an ektension of time. should be made by letter,speci.fy ng a definite period of tirde F (up to two yearsand ekplaining the delay in the start of f construction. In addition, Department Rule 156.04.25.002 requires submission of the following fees: fee . .Y Y Y Y . ~ e 1 Y . ~ . f Y • ♦..Y . Y Y Y.• . Y Y ~ .$25,00 Recording fee) pair page of letter. 1.00 Please make cheek payable to the Texas Department of Water Resources. I I I I I I 11 1 Box 13087 Capitol Stlttlon + Austin, Texas 78711 • Area Code 5121475.3187' j - v,l Yr 'a^ .dllw S_ rY•p !'t', q 1,^. 1 I t r , L :.Z 1. + I Id f _2 ,sa Compliance with the provisions of Permits No. 012 and 1706(10 , R I will keep them active and in force, if there are questions, a feel free to contact this office. very truly yours, ~ , hn R.'Clarke., P. N Head, Data Safety Unit cc: Mr. I. 'M' Rice, Director Dallas Watt®r Vtilities m. ' j.r 111 r f a III p a , t f i f + k , t AUG 4178 Gqy OF p~NS©N >~#4~# ( )w`lYh .)t1 .~tili: F.lIFl1''+.1~. ~ih~:"+.Yil: .¢v',(64e r.J ,.•S.?' ,t',~ .rift#.tC~h::9 , d' F~,"tF;39„' ,.3a. iv';.t.YZ s uy4~ '++r4wrr'Fey,'357 IiR'l~ ijF.d ,t' r, 1 17ti' ~~4~ . Y . } ,_q 4' L .46 1HP 2v i,r9 ir£ ~4 ldk0 i;lJl~i'.~1{'1' ',•=?~S 'Ma .ci r . .5;- law p}tfdes BVOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS JOA SAN JACINTO YUILDING FRANK BOOTH AU§TIN,TKXAS 7s701 I ROgtRT H, LLOYD TELRPHON[ (512) 47E•400e. LUTI~HRR •IMMONS PA" 0. (10*SKLINK SKIP NISWSOM July 6, 1979 3 it I k . Mr. Chris Hartung City Manager 216 9. McKinney Street ' !Denton, Texas 76201 RE: City of Frisco V. Texas Water Rights i COMMission Dear Christ The Texas Suprame Court denied the City of F'risco's appeal in the above referenced case an'Jul 5 Y r 1979, with a. notation no reversible error. ~ E f, This concludes the litigation on the Auhrey permits. The validity of the permits "haft beers sustained, and no further issue ca n; successfully be raised concerning the i Commission's actipn. Kindest' personal regards. Very truly yours, Frank R. Booth V"/j n , I PL M u JUL 09 1979 r CITY OF DENTo NAGE qq 1NA R'S OF'f!C 1 dd ~~rM kie~l5b t? a'd4r124 1I1'e ~{'•l}n 4<S.r[,}~'~" t.,. i. r s 1y r..ti.ch ..rF I ] ' . •r♦ 4r /t :sac. r.v r 0f4 ~w,v ;Nyt;rS rS`,"t, t`& 4~Y1d'Ft r rE~ -0"•_ .,.fit,., ,.7. INC, MANAORMONT CONt9UIt1'ANTs Dallas 'Houston Austin :i. August- 27,, 1979 _f ~r Mr. Chris Hartung city Manager ' City of Denton 215 E MOX( flney Denton, TX 76201 y, • Dear Mr, Hartung;: As We 'discilssed. on :the telephone, ws have modified our epproaoh 4o tho;Aubrey Reservoir Study to include tor- J URS Forre 844 ineeri1N,ng ho x Involvement by dis u'saedst and Cotton and Fi eese & is les this in*~alve. m6ht with Principals frozq-both ' axirms, and they have igteed to work with us on this ~itudy. To. accalmaodate this formal engineering invglvm0nt,'we propo,se to increase the project bud e get by $I3,000 to a total Of, $38,000 for professional fees plus $1,700 for expenses. 1 call y6u have any questions, please do not heaitato to ` Sincerely, ~ Gar Thom on, P.. F:. Pr inci;al G5TSow t { 3 i i 12700 Park Central, Suite 1SO5 Dallas, Texas 76251 (214) 233.6bQ 1 1 E „ . rI if y I CITY OF DALLAS September 4, 1979 Mr, Jesse C. Seal { Route 1, Box 735 ' Sanger, TX 76266 Dear Mr. Seal: your-11 etter to Congressman Ray Roberts about Aubrey Reservoir has~come to ''my attention. We share your interest in the proposed reservoir and its Value ;to property owners and nearby cities, The `cities of Dallas and Denton are working toward a decision on the protect, and, I would, like to give you a status report. As you are aware, tho'construction of.Aubrey. Reservoir has been under consideration for. many years, Because this region of. Texa's'. has a shortage of`water, it is, necessary to,plan for water resources many decades ',in. advance.;.Many `agencies, including the State of Texas', O, r Rngineers,,River Authorities; aInd,;cities haVe potential reservoir sites' identified in'their long-range plans. Such 'is the case with the Aubrey site. the cities of Denton and Dallas in partnership` are now conducting a financial feasibility'study for Aubrey.Reservoir and its alternatives. The purpose of study is three-fold: ) To update cast estimates of the Aubrey project, and to 1. ~ determine the estimated unit cost of water, j 29 ) compare the cost Of Aubrey water with the cost of water from alternative reservoirs that could be constructed further away in Fast Texas. 3.) To evaluate alternative strategies for sponsoring and constructing Aubrey Reservoir. The study.is scheduled to be completed by the end of this year; a decision Aubrey expected in the early part of 1980 whether design and construction of , y Reservoir will proceed 1 OFFICR OF THL° CITY MAHA4290 CITY HALL DALLAS, Ta;xAS 76201 TELEPHONE 211/07x=1 I I j !uvl trF. sY 6` ` H§>A. a, :.a 1Z st4 11014C ..,iv /'~k'SYaY.c~t+.li'~~J/.+~~Fa (6 t•~.../:.'1'9. it fl I. 1 Mr, Jesse C. Seal September 40 1979 Page` 2 .i In the decisions regarding the project, the ideas you mentioned will be explored. Please be assured that the interest of property owners will be considered. i Sincerely, Dr. Camille Cates Assistant to the City Manager Ct: C: Honorab e ,,RU Rober s sentatives Res ,,q 4 BC: George Schrader t M. Rice d 1or C. 06 Warnttaff % . ' j Ls ~ i SEP 0 71979 CITY OF ` p~NION ONAdER's OFF14 s 10 i Animist 1? 9?9 exorable, gal Roberts t~: l Umiap of Representatives A ` , E Mashiagtegw ti, d. 1 Dear Cenfrxeesran Roberta= t I have written you several times is the past ssprospisK my'op'"'Vitior; to Arbroy. Lakew tutlising my reasoms therefor, as well as writing tho Corva of EnCinoerst, I"' I 'im yte Worthe After roceivinK y"r rowelotter of August4eptoabes• 1'779 x.>aM_ • oneeuraF'6dl'' thst a prevlate* is imoluded is the proposed bill' to,girls eonmiler- -At atien'to the negative aspects of wow prejoots mad their effect on the ro+elews eeomemyo Its al3w with thot,'plesso be advised that we have just selA 0,69 sera tarn looatod obeut 1 pile rent ot.tha`proposed. sits h and.aboxt 1 wile from any, wtater frontage for $1106 mash. Mfr have 132 aarom about 2 idles; earth e of ibis •tolsas w4ici4 wo hrvo for solo., with abet 90% of it in ih♦ site 1 flo6i ylesa, Is t..lking wwitY k*owXodgeable ,real astoto~' peaplo wro "*t lo4rmod of • ssly oneaais of land im that area ia' tko `flood plain- (Richiird ahistfiell elf only t1ie bottom land of his 275 norm plane to a abighbor ter seXiealiwral purposes for i700..1.ho diWt past tho rest.).Abent 909 of Mr. ChatfielOOm land is iw the tleod plain. Year efforts (moanlo the Carlo ef gn neer■ ► : , E'i. j yeU} apd ether members of Congress) have killed load <sales `whisk are lsq .er part of the floe! plain, for 20 yorre. Aeeerdiajr to Colonel Nall of the Corps of ragiantrah Aubri oy { ' Lake is lead for 20 yearwq,.i.ne eae wants to byy lan•! pal them flOt tko goverm-' ment~to het their mossy baokll Our x32 mars feria is slush wore desirable 'than the 69 sore tract in ovary rewspect but yeur,pot ereject.boa shot its sale dewm. This abo4ow kao prsrented site sale until the lake in built and it is' aeadoiwwtel4 or until the ;project is killod, tar ally price oxoeyt sbuut.50p of what Tina will b'friag outst4o the fleed yams. W* boueht this rlavo in 195g `an3 the, 69 rives r in 146 to they wers vot speculative prroYeoaws. i t is eneirra •iti , t• knew that ifentoa '4nd Dollsa pre roinq iutb a'study` ot. 14 • ' i^y► eke tiwease von w thou f•r}ere of 1) «p eo n e your l snoourtiging to a. 411. TIN i would have t4•t site 5 puul4 be used as "it hie about 0 adyatatikos that site l loan mot hate. .Toni Harxeel mipd Alet f Fisley, repreoatitiig Den`tea at the hooriag a tow yearn ego# preforrod vita I) tt but they vre,lso loap,,er in 'otfiee and maybe present officials wall take M64ker look at site'3 with all Ito advaptaresw tho orinai'pal ono being eate,him riear E Croel: water W?i*6 is deflaiteiy" much sl'oaror than VIA *NO role d+bois wa.ter.) Dro,Silwoy. reaorw-aded thin for water q%$lity at the hearinr;ti Air.,em Doilies loll ald eeissider Us accessibility of site I to their water.ylattt. Two purpooe at this lettsr is to apaisr voies my opmaition to Aubrey bake 0, and to toll you I-kc)a the envision of earai$*ri>tg K'ejtitiy aspeota of the lake ~ . to tw people is re taimsd. lyw ; Raeeeatta] a Joel;* Bray ku to i R 1 nor 735 i.. 8anaerw Tx ,76266 f Ctpiec tow i, Roy Roberts Don tou office Corps tit Mngigoors of rt. Worth Meyer Dill Nash of Vito tom Public Utilities Comnissi~-n, Denton water Deard# City of Dallas y f ~ dye . • . . • . 1 1~.~1,{xl h. ~~''-aft ~A~~A~`1431 .s3•.:' :,F, s". . h•~ i . r11 , ~ , Ronse1na for vita 5 rather t4am site 1-Attbro,tr Rasorvotr a 14 water frait a 'rinali lorpror wvterslod. 2. A lnrpa ntimbor of uoluimeat pools are *lready on Clexr Creels in Sail Censer- Lotion Laker, ulreooy "provide clear water. E 3. Frees avid Athor atnrtet of eeelerry ihug4atod by site 3 lira .not nourtr as t o b:eauti6l at in Unpor roaahee of Tiiaity. 4. Rsc;irP1es6 of the lncati.otq cf the dow, setae school dietriot or r?ictriotra . are going to ha httrt...wii0er it is Dentewo Snnp,or, pilot Poillt*'valley , Viowo or Aubrey'. Tide is in retoroweo to Denteaee` yash for site t rxtliur } tkan site 3• 50 Growth pattorn of Deritep will not be Aaaaeaed ax Dowten bas largo areas in all direatipna for growth except Word Dellss. I 6. Thor* art poakis renchinp, the 650.660 level at ull attevo tkue allowing deeper 1 lake the furtker it in down river is keo0lairwith statement rondo by Dr. J.'X. e do bilv.sy r0 at'dimS lake d**tho with whic7 I heartily o1rrri4.6.rlore dovth,. j I with lean lr.nd eondomri*4. I RwKds elated 00111d Duly he in ranall partisan, erd t1ty ratoaindorfi trottld alraudy he built, an neocie' ; rm,)#r to the lake. 80 'by osin~,"site rntlsor tkah 1 er.2 more lakosi, ri'toe Q)rd• par!► mites-: would to #rovided an it tip,yeraro 'co lave more ahoreliae.'. .art that lacoteM senrex the laepulati©n cohtere of Dallas,!'t. Ylortwen1 Darttan. ' 9• Deep wetsr norr tke do* would be closer to tie oent'err; ►tning the watir...Dallse ant Dentonb looauild mt Bite nevi hefero to many relocations of ir,pruwotit are +taeoasary-- ' tkon e►iildirt'g at rite I 'or '4 later ow at n Ireex reael+ee3 it 14 bo more graCtical. 'fb work i'u ttis othor` direct.iort weul/ serve to elininato ai to 3 at a later det.e becoutre it will be thie k vi l isttroresents to bo condottno! 20 years from no., It Denton tied Dallas build this Without federal iate"ontion Goats' oua be roduced 'drastic, jly,..,, Jast ar 11«ye learood that t crap build tanks ox-cap } tame witkout!00S rarulatiane for mwet; is#*' at mori deal ruble''loeations$ evep eonsidorinp; tbe'JCreerano t;money furnished with the BOB t(nks. WATF12 lcP$()11I2L'PS pkVT,t)F'MF_NC ACT pl 1974 ~a Rd p " As chafrmnn 6f t:hu:idoCer kcfiources 4ubtommttreo of the liuttAe Public: a' Works 011d TranaportatJon' Comm ICtea, I'm proud to reilort:tiint we've approved the Witter Resources novelupment Ara of. 1479, This' comprt+houe{vn hill in- cl.uding projects for naviFntlon, flood control, trtlnsportatlon,water supply 'and, recreation --`should bo considered on the floor of the. (louse in the next pnonth. There Arc severnl key Toxas projects inclltded,'in the package. We've !{j elated some improvoments to Lake Texunn, authoriv.od a bridge at Lewisville Take across Cottonwood Branch near. little h, +utd we've approved Corps of Fngineers gtttdlm,, for the ncteds of Northeast Texas wnter supply, / One oCthe key provisions of the bill trj lttnµutl;e tnstructing'Lh(!''urps fly i . f 11ng1neers to Include In their fc_aslIMIty'studles the po.,ttive And tip-Ba- ' vc £fcctta new 1) rujcet;t wllI have on the p0oplelie ir e(toabmy, and , vet; ~)nql ranvirnnmont' „rr c _ G- v r INC. WNAC+EMENT CoxevIlrAwrS Dallas Rouston 'Austin s Septembei,r l7, 197'9 Mx. Chris Hartung City Manager Municipal Building s 215 t, McKinney y C1t y.of Denton, Texas 76201 t Dear Mr. Hartung, 1 This letter is intended to formalize the engagement of LWFWO Inc, with the City of Denton in connection with the Financial Feasibility Study of Aubrey Resev,oir. ' Our schedule calls for commencing the study in late } September, 19796 We estimate the study will require " approximately three (3) months to complete. `r We estimate the cost of therstudy, as' defined in the proposal, will be $39 jlOb in6lu8ing out, of .the pocket<exFieni~es for travel and; reproduction$ Expenses are estimated to not exceed $1r,700. Total fees and expenses will be billed monthly for work accomplished during the month. if the study can be completed, for less than the 'estimated amount, " only those fees and expenses actually hcurred will be,bi,lled. r. Sincerely, Y. E N Gary S. "T mpson, p.t. Principal The services described in this letter are in accordance with our requirements and are acceptable to us. { a C ty Manager ° k ' 12700 Park`pentra1, suite 1808 7Dallae, Texas 75261 ~ (214) 233.5dei ~ Wow', •~3}}~`s'Prk WS x§t V:~p~fti • VY& ? #.~.M1 . ~'s .r .1 %~tti:~p`lii l ,l.ti~'r_}'Y~ .i,Ua, rrJ t\ M;yj'~ M:.e ti: 1311t(41L.~4fF{4'F~''.,~ itsd}.^...yy}1 t ~.fe 4-m A',..lt 4 r . 1 I L 4 TI- VIA INC UANAGW"NT CONSUUPA47,'M Dallas Houston Austia f September 28, 1079 i Mr. Bob Gooch Freese & Richola all Lamar Street Fort Worth, TX 75102 h ~ Dear Bobs ` I spoke with you several weeks ago regarding a proposal LWFW submitt@d to the Cities of Denton and Dallas for the financial ~ I feasibility study-of Aubrey Re6d,rvoir. As you may recall, I f was interested .in Freese- & Nicholeavailability to work with } LWJFW to update the previous analysesyou,had made of the Aubrey project, t ' We have been fortunate to'receive a contract for this study, and°I have enalosed a copy of our proposal and workplan,,as : well as the original RVP, for your review. Although 'it is difficult at this time to pin down the,level'of involvement j i required on the: part; of Freese & Nichole,:I am certain we'. I Can '+looo>splish what n@ede to be done within the constraints j of your availability and our budgetary limitations:. f. Will 'oai;l you early: next` wreak to 'az}°awer any question. yt;t:' 1 egarding the study,' and ,to set tip a, time we, light have, riiight"me@ti to discuss your irivolV.ement. 'thank `you very much for, your interest and cooperation4 Sincerely, , ; Gary s. Thompson', P. E. Principal GSTtcw i riclostlr@$,; f ct " Mz'. Ctris hartung Citi, ~,14nager E City of Denton Denton, TX 76201 MOO Park Central, Suite 1805 Dallo% Toxes 78251 (214) 233.5561 ~ , 1 41` .E . . rw inn faLi•.n .vai L:'.k:.J,i4 SM1A i1.J4 .H'. All Memorandum cjV 05 DAUAS, n~sE 16 Oatober 1979 a to moRAZIDUM FOR FILE ; aveaecs 'Aubrey Reservoir I met with Major Genera. Donovan, Srequest tttoidiscuss thenpresent statusrof s on October 12 at his r of Engineer ect. Our discussion included the backg ound Aubrey p;oj and prognosis for the on the factors which had prevented Dallas from going ahead with the Aubrey Frisco the rate o vanra cobs oftthefForrest &suitCottonAndfeasibilitycas6study1showed project thus General Dono pY and the LWFW proposal for a financial feasibility study of Aubrey under the ~ direction of Denton and Dallas, which is now underway. Donovan stated he believes"fiscal year 1980 is the.critica3 year for and ro ect is to be builWitutxhis strongtbackingaethere ie.no' General Aubrey. If the p j POW Congressman Ray Roberts is the key, ro ect. He has kept the;'!project alive so far and, with the two hope ;'for the p j sitive indication of action by Dallas obstacles mentioned above reino4ed, a po action will be the and Denton`is, ended if pit ey,is to be built, A keY ' be, test monY on the Contraction pt'°arandb5en G al aterPublic~WorkshSubcommitteeerofethed r s in February 19$0 before the Hods Appropriation Committees. General Donovan says he needs to be able to Assure the two subcoamdttees that loca'j interests intend fox Aubrey rFY1981th the, Aubrey project if there is to bj any funding Y in ~ One Between nosy and the February`' testiMOny two under a is~for"the Fort Worth District ct corps of Engineer Section 404 of P.L. 92-500 ofathahEnvironmental elmpacttstatementmforaAubrey and This necessitates ro ect has not been the public hearings will be required So bOrganization for a sound the Sierra target of opposition from i:ueh gt'oups as . Trinity (COST), the Texas Committ'oe on Natural Resources `(TCNR)1, or, ~ Club as has been true, in thy, case of Lakeview, Cooper and Tennessee dountil` reservoirs. Perhaps one xeasano,r lack of opposition there really has been no forum for any Section 404 opposition ` action-is taken, ~ to Aubrey to be heard. reparation of ainal drafts of the water 6upply and s ► The second action i6 p recreation contracts which must be signed' between the Cities of, Dallas and Denton as local sponsors and the Corps. Denton has seen; fit tt fallow Da114%s' Substantial agreement has lead in the matter of negotiating thesE. cc+ntracts. contracts. As regards the recreation Contracts, , been reached on the water supply Dallas' concern has been the extensive thenIncialofiability t 'at DallasI euld tosts the corps incur h paying its share. of one-half ti r recreation plane Moreover, the Corpo willnot operate these recreational y I IIP;0011 , , . R#'ve l l'?-r. t~a~i~r9~~ti ^E~~. t 1 r . Memorandum for File -,Aubrey Reservoir 10/16/79 page Z facilities for Aubrey as it do¢s at Lakes Lewisville, Grapavine and Lavon, Dallas and, Denton, would have to' operate the recreation facilities or paY' E someone ease to 'do so. There is Prospect'othenlaseimited inceweReservoir, j operating the recreational facilities, Lakeview sponsor, 'eservoir Trinity Riven Authority, which is the local cooperating a provision in-their recreation contract to limit T'RA's liability for payments to the Corps for recreation to the amount of income realized by s i TRA'from recreation charges and fees, General Donovan was of the opinion 'that'it would be `very difficult to get the Secretary of the Army to agree to similar provision in the recreation contract for Aubrey. As an alter- } native, Genoral Donovan would be willing to consider reducing the scope'of the recreation pXari to `what is ter ad minimum recreation facilities. In the cast of minimum recreational facili't`ies, the federal government would assume all recreation costs. Minimum recreation is generally dese:iiptive j of the facilities provided by the City of Dallas at Lake Ray Hubbard, with ~ the excepticI Elgin; Robinson Park. Whim= °facilities consist of boat ramps, limited picnicking and parki g'facilities, restromt E ofbfuel at these t provision i.: laundrys or running water, no camping hookups, `no camp, sites, etc.' General Doroviln's indication that the Corps was willing to take anew look at the recreational plan seams to me to represent a` change of attitude on'the.part of the Corps 'which has heretofore been rattier firmly committed to providing full recreational facilities. s j we-are entering into a critical time period, The Section 404 determination in' i` should take'place before the end of 197for GAuberal rey.tnnhisnFeis to bruaryel980 position to recommend construction, funds I tei+imony.' Agreement should be.reached on the recreation contracts by the I' time Congress votes on the appropriation bill', say, by )`Ay or dune 1980. It is noted that the LWFW report will not be, completed until about January 1. Therefore,'we are in a position of having to make a:3adgment without the . b t full information,_if we request tha Corps, to proceed with, the benefit 404 hcaring,. ~ I An appropriate course of action would be to meet with the tort Worth District P. • 1 for l Dfscuss proceeding with the Section 404 determination; ' R - Reach agreement on the recreation plan and the recreation contract. ' It is believed these two contracts could be taken without making a final ~ i commitment an Aubrey. However it will likely be necessary thst a fixm decision on Aubrey be made before February 1980. Y plan to meet with the port Worth District Engineers next week to explore these possibilities. 1 I. H. Rice jd k al Camille Cates -Lee Holt . Torn faylor. ;W, G, 'Trainer ~ t 'Jack•Robinson .a.n,pr. ?.y ..•r» ..e.,.:.' t.. 1, :h d .«•7•iaS,tiV1:~<fd h' I 10-19. y (.fTY~f11RN►ON~T*XAS WIN10PALOUILOW. i DENTON, IE W 7W I MCPNON[(INllu WOl 't I LWFW, Irio Park ConCral III 12700 Park Central Place Suite 1805 f' 214/233-5561 a I I I r 1 AGENDA „ souse general, water demand & supply considerations for Dallas and Denton, a . f 2, The definition of East Texas reservoirs whose water costs will be compared to Aubrey's. J i' 3.. Discussion of Aubrey Reservoir a, Cast to build 4 b. 17ependable yield r Summary of major Variables to be considered in the k financial'' anaysis E~ 5Short term plans for, the study Team. i 1 s ' br ry 2r„ F k . f r i Jr rl is r V ' f ~ 7 t i I. ~ E' t rl §4p}q;;, b5}N1R1f r..rb. .ar .A':vse. .tht+er?'J.r ,r, r. : r. : i 1. - r t mTm m s nLBtm PY Sm F12TI rnMrRrm~rF'F wnRrcalinp' ' I OCTOBER 19, 1975 k The purpose of the Aubrey Steering Committee Workshop was to review the technical and economic factors associated with the 4 Aubrey Reservoir Feasibility Study. The session included a review of Denton and Dallas' supply and demand for water, a listing of.potentiai future water supplies'-a discussion of Aubrey costs and yield► and a summary of variables to be f r addressed in the study. The scope of the study was refined to"include consideration of water costs from only Cooper and Sulphur Bluffs 2 and 11 ~ Reservoirs as alternatives to Aubrey, The oosts for water delivered into take Lewisville would form the basis of the calculation, plans for future workshops include a technical r worksho scheduled for November 1, and a finanoing/sponsor- ' ship workshop to be held November 20. zn addition, respon- ' i k sibilitx for' a number o.f, parallel efforts was. assigned. i' The technical,workshop will include Dan Brock (City of Dallas 1 Hydrologist) , Bob Steele (URS/Forrest & Cotton), Bob Gooch f (Freese & Nichols),.a technical representative from the u4s. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Aubrey Steering Commit tee. By getting these technical experts together for this } l discussion, LWPW hopes to reduce the range of ,safe yield estimates for Aubrey. E ' i k ~ r r t . -n ws,.rt+ t `tit v,~ s'A3t(r iL K'!2'n1'l,•1xEC }Sf._xfF~ k F k , r l s 1 Aubrey Steering Committee Minutes Page 2 October' 191979 The financing/sponsorship worksha;) will define alternative .1, { sources of financing, and pin down the costs and terms associated with each source. Partieipants'will include First Southwest Corporation and the Public Finance Depart- ' ment`of First National, Bank in Dallas. other efforts assigned were investigation of State of Texas aid in sponsoring any,, recreational facilities (Chris Hartung) or obtaining water development funds (Chris Hartung, Catille Cates, Tom TaylC4 , beginning contract negotiations•with the corps of Eng4ri rs.' 1(Tom Tay'' 16r Nelson), and assuring,.that :.elected of.':'~ , 4-19 r r at the local and federal level were kept informed as this I study progtesses`,(Camille Cates, Chris Hartung). t • 1 j 1. t y t 11 ' ! ,ay., ,.g,.~riU .n.~ 5: v3 .3d.. ,Y.r.4:S>.ti, r• , V yea.n .\r ♦ r 4.,y19 .°I:. k.1 a .;VS \ j • i CITY OF DALLAS L October 23, 1979 i Mr. Harvey, Davis, Executive Director Texas Department of Water Resources P. 0. Box 13087 Capitol Station 1700N, Congress Austin, Texas 78701 t' ` Dear Harvey: Since Tom Taylor and ,1 visited with you in July a lot of progess has been made toward settlement of the rate disputes, A settlement document 4 I was negotiated with the cities; 16 City Councils have ratified it, Farmers Oranch is itie OnTyy'one yet to approve the settlement, and discussions are continuing with them. Recently, the Water Commission seta re hearing cbnference t O the settlement for November 270 1979 at 10;00 a.m. In the meantime* dthe customer cities ai•e 'reviewing our cost-of-service documents, It is our ` hope to present a unanimous agreement at the November 27 conference,' We* consider the rate settlement a very ` significant achievement.-oneof great importance to the State.' In the recent issue of the employee magazine for the ballas Water Department, the settlett~ent was,,the e ture news item. For the tnforr"ation of your staff, I have enclosed six copies of "News and Views", We ore continuing„to work with Denton`on,the final' anal sis';' t Reservoir rc,leet, Y he ~4ubrey The two cities. have jointly emplo ed consu p lting ass.is- f tan g e the feaasibiTity of,t a project. 'We will >:epeyou and informmeedtof our pro ggress We plan to be in Austin,in November and will drop by to personally bring you up to date. Sincerer Dr. Cami Te Cates Assistant to the City Manager 1,,,~ 1 x`13. 4 sv j ~~'~'25 1919 E ~i. ~pt1A r k , LL AS, TEXAS 76201 '7CLEPHdtJ i~1lE70.3901 i L -i r INC MANAGEMENT CONSUIXANTS '~V Y Houston pahre ~ oueton Austin ' al I 1 October 23, 1979 Mr. Bob Gooch Freese Nichols 811 Tamar Street Fort`Worth, TX 76102 Dear Bob: This is to,confirm our conversation of lest Pric:ay regarding pur`partioipation in the Aubrey Reservoir Technical Warkw shop to be held Thursday, November 11 1979, at, 1:30 p.m. The workshop will be held at'LWFW's offices at 12700 Park Central, s Suite 1805, in Dallas. The purpose of 'this workshop is to wring together the tech-• ti ni.a.ai experts who have evaluated the yield of the Aibrey 1 Reservoir'projedt. By understanding the thinking which has gone'intcivari.oifs evaluat dns,,we hope to agree on appropriate assumptiohs whidh will set or reduce the range of yield to be utilized in our.'~keasibility study. In addition to the Aubrey' Reservoir; Financial 1• easibility Study:Steering.Committee, which includes Camille,dp.tes, Tom Taylor, an Clarence w7arnstaff from;the City of DAllas,.and Chris. Hart' hg and Bob Nel'sorl from the City of b6nto~i, the, are expected to partieipato in 'the workshop: pan ng, 'r followi, ' Brock (bkb) F'iob Stee.]e (VRS/POrrest & Cotton)', and a technical representative from the Corps of Engineers. E The agenda for the meeting will include presentation by the Dallas Water Utiilties pepartment of their Aubrey/YeWisville Operating 4e,sumptions and 'the impact of these assumptions on ~ .Aubrey Rpsgivoir dependable yield. This'presentation will be follou,xi by'an open discussion of the `Aubrey Reservoir dependaLle, yield. { i If you have any questions regardang this workshop,,please do nat;hesib4te to call me. X appreciate your cooperation in this, ji`j It, look forward to seeing you on November 1. a ,Sinc''Q ly, t Gary S. Thom son, P.E. Principal Taxas 715251 (214) 233.5561 12700 Park 06ntral, S ite 1806 o? Denton /a: Mr. Chris Hartun~, City of Denton f , s INC, YKwrrwanMnxT CarrsutlcwrtTs l } Da11a* Houstou Austin ff I EE October 24, 1979 Mr.' Lewis McClain First National Rank P. 'O. Box 83765 Dallas, TX 75283 Dear Lewis: Th nanciai Feasibili. Si St } u ed a financing/sponsor or s op to be held jj' has ;s 20. The , in ~ ouxr Office at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, No purpose of this workshop is to discuss, alternate meens.of sponsoring and.finanding Aubrey Reservoir other than the Corps of Zngineers. Prior to the workshop, Chris Hartung and other'st©ering,committee members will be visiting Austin :.o, discuss alternative sponscrsh p with seyeral agencies including the Texas Department of Parks' a.Ld lkecreation. . t I will be taiking.wlth you in the, nett' week or two to dis- oust the a0enda for the. November 20th workshop, and things the Public Finance Division of First National. Bank might ppt. together in preparation of this 'A)eeting; I ,have enolosed,a copy of the mimites of the`Aubrey Steering Committee -Workshop conducted' la.stiweek, for your review and information. Sincerely, , E Gary S. Thompson, P.E. Principal j ' f GSA' " 6~ j 1 r ~Z t'tl aAf !h ~ ' Enclosure" oc+E,. L hris '.Hartung City Manager, t,r;' O~ Y, ~ of Denton Suits 1805 Dallao, Taxes 75;261 `(214) 230.6561 ; T7qQ;Patk Central, . l^ fc hi.Jl411 Ibl..~i t o MEMORANDUM TO $ 4is ~ ibility St eSteering Committee titq FROMs Gory Thompson, hWFW ; "i DATE: October 260 1979 { We met with the Corps of.Engineers last Monday and received ~ some information which will clarify some of the topics we I di.soussed at the Aslbrey Workshop. I have attached this information for your review. r 1 ~ At the and of our technical workshop the afternoon of , Ij Thur,sfty, November 1, I would like to discuss with the '1 E Steering Committee some of the details of the proposed i ` Corps of Erngiheers contract with the Cities of Denton and Dallas. Hopefully the length of the technical work i shop on dependable yield will 'not exceed 2h-3 hours so that we will have time foil thib, additional topic. ' We look forward to seeing you on Thursd6y. , GST:cw x/ Attachment <c t/ s + h 1 1 i + i CLARIFICATIONS FROM AUBREY STEERING COMMITTEE WORKSHOP OCTOBER l9, 1979 Based upon discussions with the Army Corps of Engineers since the workshop, our understanding of the following issues has been revised: i I I. INTEREST RATE * Interest rate on Corps of Engineer's financing would be 6.595% if the water supply and recration contracts were signed today. This interest rate is liable to increase a maximum of one quarter of one percent each year. Th( 34% interest rate (which the Corps spokesman quoted and which was repeated at the workshop) is used in the Corps benefit/cost justifioat:ion analy,is, .gad has nothing to do witn,;actual practice. 1I. CAPACITIES OF LEWISVILLE AXD AUBREY in answer to the question of whether Lewisville's total capacity is changed, the following numbers show 4,-.hat the difference is attributable to sedimentation: FLOOD CONSERVATION CONTROL STORAGE SEDIMENT TOTAL (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet:) (--feet) Lewisville (existing) 480,500 367,600 141,600 989,700 i Lewisville (proposed) 325,700 555,000 '1090000 989,700 Aubrey 265,000 799,600 54,600 h,119,200 _ TOTAL 590,700 11354,600 163,600 21108,900 f t i t RV ~l 4 Clarifications Page 2 i 1. III. LOCAL INTEREST Local interest in costs allowable to water storage r is one hundred percent (100%) This means that local " interests will pay approximately seventy-one percent (71%) of the total cost of the project. The current costa are estimated by the Carps of Engineers as follows, Water -aomiY Recreation SpeciFic facilities 218,000 C .x_390,00 50% Federal '12 Joint use facilities 127,600,800 96,7,00 10 0 % Fe der al Interest during 14 , 5` 9 8, 2 0 0 2 7V,] construction construction 142,417,000 84,344,000 66,574,000 Ved. Local Share 142,417,000 .17,770,000 160,1.87,000 Local TOTAL 2260761,000 f { 1 t 4 _ - INC. MANA )JMU NT CONSULTAN'T'S Dallas 1-Jouston Austin October 26, 1979 K Mr. Frank Medanich First Southwest Company 900 Mercantile Bank Building Dallas, Texas 75201 Dear Mr. Medanich: k I enjoyed talking with you yesterday and look forward to meeting with you at 9:30 a.m. Thursday, November 1 at your office concerning our Aubrey Reservoir. Finan- cial Feasibility Study. I have enclosed a copy of our proposal and workplan for the project as well as the original RFP prepared by the Cities of Dallas and Denton. As you can see from these documents, we are to evaluate the economic impact of alternative sponsors and financing sources. We are also, to com- pare the cost of Aubrey water under various arrange- ments with the cost of water from selected East Texas reservoirs pumped to Lake Lewisville. The ~r transmission facilities to permit pumping tolast Texas f water to the Elm Fork water shed will require some j type of local financing as opposed-to being a Corps of Engineer project, When we meet on Thursday, I would like us to jointly define where you and First Southwest can contribute to the study based on the study i~cope and the time limitations. Thank, you very much for your interest in this study. Sincere], . Gary S. Thompson, P,E. r Principal GST: cw Enclosures cc: /Mr. Chris Hartung City of Denton 12700 1'ark Central, Suite 1805 Dallas, Zbxas 75261 (214) 233.5681 t L - - ' " ryJ First National Bank in D all" !!I f _ - Dallas,Tcxas752831-14)7448o6Q I,I LEWIS F. Muwv k, I Vice President P. 0. BOX 83785 (214) 744.0343 C r November 2, 1979 { Mr. C. Chris Hartung City Manager City of Denton 215 L. McKinney St. Denton, Texas 76201 Y Dear Chris; I I appreciate the opportunity to participate as a resource person on the Aubrey financial feasibility study. I plan to visit with Gary Thompson to get a status report on the results f of the technical meeting, Subsequent to that, I will get several people in the bank together to determine the alternatives we t l can come up with. Just ac a matter of information, we are the financial advisors to ti,,) Texas Department of Water Resources. We look forward to providing any assistance we an to this feasibility study. It is going to be a pleasure to work with you again. E f f Since sly, 1 Lewis McLain Vice President I ( dj ' ~ r" i r I AAi I N OV 05 1979 I CITY OF ►U nsusdlaryur ~ Filsl InlrnulKxu,l H:,tKSfums, px., Y M CE I ~~r . b Y q r ' N ~ ~M D I ' ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ;f r _........~.v E v Y 1IJC. MANAGEMENT CONSULWANTS ' Dallas Houston Austin j I STATEMENT j November 1979 i k Mr o Chris Hartung City, Manager City v en' On 215 E. MG nixoy DantOn~ Texas 76201 ?1UBRF Y - FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY SmIJbY k r 1 October. Professional Foes $10,662 ,50 80,1F f Expenses f - $10,742.66 I TOTAL ,I I I ~ i Y 1 l NOV 12 1979 " I Ci 1 Y 0 1) 1:C~1 C PJ MANAGER 4 I ; R 12700 Park Central, Suite 1805 Dallas, gbxrs 7G;Lw (214) 2,113-556' 4 011Y OF DALLAS November 16, 1979 Mr. Charles D. Travis Executive nirector Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith Schoul Road Austin, TX 78744 Dear Mr. Travis: arding the Aubrey t Your taking the time last rec7atedy tAsvweidiscussed,rthe Cities of Dallas Reservoir Project is app the feasibility of the project, updating the and Denton are re-examining cost, and considering alternative reservoirs. rs that Aubrey Reservoir as a water supply project is marginal, It appea projectnisrpateini0as.favorable a Therefore, all aspects the that proJect carefully reviewed to assure t context as possible. indicated that the State is convinced that additional park facilities the growth this area You are needed in the area north of Dallas. We concur; is experiencing does create additional demandsrlfor quality recreational facilities. Therefore, we solicit Your , project, 1 ur studies are expected to be completed by the end of December, In the ons meantime we would appreciate the opportunity thisci,rn~ert our Please discussions 0 i with your department about participation de that will assist you, know what further information we can provide that will assist you. i f Sincere y, ' Camille Cates p,s.;stant to the City Manager I mb c-, Chris Hartung City Manager of Denton i Jack Robinson, Director k Parks & Recreational Department Thomas E. Taylor, Assistant Director Water Utilities Department OFRC! OF SNL' eM KANACEl1 CITY HALL DALLAS, TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE 2 1 //6 7 0 5901 I. I ~ 1 , w r CITY OF DALLAS h ` 1 Y s November 200 1979 Mr. Earl F. Hale, Jr. Dallas Chamber of Commerce 1507 Pacific Avenue Dallas, TX 75201 Dear Earl; Thank you for your letter of November 2 supporting the development of needed water resources. We are in fact moving ahead very positively to I reassess the feasibility of the Aubrey Project. The consultants assisting us in this effort are well underway and we expect their report to be completed by the end of December. Concurrently, we are in discussions with the Corps of Engineers and with the various state agencies having an interest in the Aubrey Project. We are anticipating the facts that will gear on a decision to be available by early 1980 and anticipate making a decision on the Aubrey Project by the spring of 1980, 3ecause the Aubrey Reservoir would provide a gravity ` source of water supply, it is attractive when one considers what the availability of energy might be over the life of a reservoir. Consequently, serious consideration is being given to the Aubrey Project; even though, other reservoir sites with more prolific yields are availabe in Cast Texas. i 1'he Cooper Reservoir Project is being sponsored by other agencies. However, we are encouraged by recent favorable community support that the legal hurdles that now have the project delayed can soon be overcome. We agree with you that the Aubrey Project and Cooper Reservoir are the two most obvious water supply projects that sh,)u1d be considered and supported at this time. An alternative project that we will be comparing with the Aubrey Project is the Sulphur Bluff Reservoir$ i i OFFICE OF THL CITY MANAM CITY HALL DALLAS. TEXAS 76201 TELEPHONE 214(810.5301 ! MEMORANDUM TO: Frank Medanich, First Southwest Co. Lewis McClain, First National Bank Aubrey Steering Comm ,Vtee FROM: Gary Thompson, LWFW DATE: November 21, 1979 RE: REY RESERVOIR This is to confirm that the Aubrey Financing Workshop will be held at 2:00 p.m. Monday, December 3 in the LWFW conference room. The purpose of thrz meeting will be to revii;wr financing options with Frank and Lewis, and discuss the results of the steering committee's visit to Austin, Texas, t I have enclosed a summary of five (5) individual water 1 supply options which will be evaluated and compared during this feasibility study. Included with each f option are capital costs, financing (some require s ' input from our finance experts), operating and mainte- nance costs, and safe yield. r I have also attached, for the steering committee's ' review, copies,of the cost updates whi.ch Forrest & Cotton has supplied us. This information should be helpfk,l ii, preparing for out I workshop and serve as a basis fo,: discussion. I antici- pate that the workshop will last for three hours. We look forward to seeing you at 2:00 p.m. on the 3rd. L ELP CITY OF [DALLAS November 20, 1979 Mr. Earl F. Hale, Jr, Dallas Chamber of Commerce 1507 Pacific Avenue Dallas, TX 75201 i s Dear Earl: orting the development of Thank You for your letter of Piovember 2 supp ahead very positively to needed water resour(es. of fife AubreytProject, The consultants assisting reassess the feasibility us in this effort are well underway and we expect their report to be completed by the end o of En Concurrently, we are -'in discusIng anwinterestCinpt;v AubreyeProject.4!{We tho various state agencies having isio a de the Aubrey Pvaila le are anticipating the facts that will bear an a decis'4an to be available by early 1980 and aftiticipate making a Because th,) Aubrey Reservoir would provide a gravity it i<attractive When one considers what the the spring of 1980. se tly, source of water supply, of energy might be over the life of a PPa~ert,revenothougl~n availability given to the Aubrey ' serious consideration is being g~ralif{c yields are availabe in East other reservoir sites with more prolific Texas, sponsored by other agencies. The Cooper Reservoir Project is being ert that however, we are endhatanow haveethetprojectbdelayeducan y soonpbe overcome. the legal hurdles t r are the We agree with you that the j'~brro~~ctsethatnshouldebeRconsideredCad project that we will be comparing two most obvious water Supply projects alternative • i.erna p f supported at this time. An al ! with the Aubrey Project is the Sulphur Bluff Reservoir. l OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CITY HALL DALLAS. TEXAS 15201 TELVI10NE 2W610.9902 i Y Mr. Earl F, Hale, Jr. Flovvmber 20, 1979 Page We are working closely with the City of Denton on the Aubrey Project, and would be pleased to visit with your conmiittee to discuss the status of the project if that would be helpful, Otherwise, we will keep you up-to-date of the progress and the report findings as they'bec:ome available. Sincerely, i Camille Cates Assistant to the City Manager r E mb C: Srhri's Hat^iiti~~ ; Thomas E. Taylor, Assistant Director ' 4Iater Utilities Department George R, Schrader, City Manager I f F j N OV 2 6 1979 +GA RW OF DENTfNd WMGER'S OVF'ICF F' 4 1 r WATER SUPPLY OPTION 1 Aubre by Corps of Engineer_s_ Capital Cost: Total ;+22617611000 Local Share $).60,187,000 Financing: $74,935,600 (51;N of water supply cost) 11,26$,500 _(initial recreational development) $861204,100 financed at 7.21%, 50 equal annual payments, beginning at completion of project $67,481,400 (49% of water supply cost) 6,501,500 (future recreational devul.opment) $73,982,900 financed at 7.21%, 59 equal annual payments, beginning ten i years after completion of project (assumes than future, water supply is used and recreational development completed at ten year paint). f Operating & Total $890,300/yr Maintenance: Local. Share $803,400/yr ~ Safe Yiuld: * 53.6 14GD at completion, decreasing at 0.1318 annually No transmission facilities or costs * Safe yield is being re-evaluated based on updated assumptions l ~ j 11 . I t i i f `Ir 4 ' ' WATER SUPPLY OPTION 2 j Aubrey by Vocal Sponsora (Water Supp_~ny) Capital cost: $185,804,000 Financing: Terms to be furnished. by j First Southwest Corp and 1 First National Bank of Dallas I' Operating & Maintenance: $137,800/yr To be determined Safe Yield: i No transmission facilities or costs i , C 1 i l Y iy r} i Y WATER SUPPLY OPTION 3 I i Sulphur bluff I (Local Sponshorship, 100% Elm Fork) Reservoir capital cost: $94,387,000 Transmission Capital Cost: $101,078,000 1 Reservoir & Transmission ' Financing: Terms to be furnished I Reservoir operating & r Maintenance: ~)138,900/yr Transmission Operating & Maintenance (excl Power): $124,200/yr t. i Power Usage: 124,152,000 KWH annually # I it Safe Yield: 107.4 MGE i I i j i 1 'i . j it r i r. WATER SUPPLY OPTION 4 I Sponsorship, 6^lm Fork) M Sulphur Bluff x and 11 (Loca $ 94,387,000 Reservoj.r Capital Cosh xI $ 30_,423G0 TOTAL $1241810,000 EL[d FORK SHAME $ 851073,000 $101,078,000 Transmission Capital Coati: } Reservoir & '1ransmission Teams to be furnished Financing: f E I $1381900/Yr Resewoir operating & ' Maintenance: xx $ 18,900/Yr TOTAL $157,800/Yr ELM FORK SHARE $107,604/Yr f "Transmission Operating & Maintenance (exa1. power): $124,200/Yr , 1791177000 MI annually Power Usage: t z 107.4 Safe Yield: 120.0 k TOTAL 227.4 I ' ELM FORK SHARE 155,0 : l WATER SUPPLY OPTION 5 i r ~ s Cooper by Corps of Engineers _(36.859% Irving) ~f Reservoir Capital Cost: Total $85,600,000 s Local Share $32,300,000 ° Irving Share$111905,500 Reservoir Financing. Terms to be furnished by Corps of Engineers Transmission Capital Cost: Totalz $53,364,000 Irving Share$33,498,000 1 Transmission Financing, Terms to be furnished Reservoir Operating & Total $105tooo/yr Maintenance: Irving $ 38,700/yr. t ' Transmission operating & Totall $85,600/yr Maintenance (excl power: Irving $60,500/yr 3 q Power Usage: Total, 93,064,000 KWH annually 3 4 Irving 561440,000 KW11 annually, h Safe Yield: Totall 107.1 MGD Irving 39.5 MGD ~ f E 1Reservoir Costs paid by SW4WD, NTMWD, and Irving { r ~ 2Transmission Costs paid by NTMWD and Irving f M. I ' L URS AN !NTCRNATJONALYr7UYf,55lONAL Ffi/VfiE$ 0iiCAN11AtION YOPX CONSULTING ENGINEERS WASHINGTON 0- CALM, 6700 STE,MMONS FREFWAY SCArn.F: DALLAS, TFXAS 75247 KA $qy CIIr L TEL: (214) 630•3500 W)KGOAU FT NF W OM FANS IC AO(, rH gjr ~H I{ U11FFA17 November 16, 1979 h otNaVALE E NJED Y U GERMA K7DlGCY.`k1 i Mr, Gary S, Thompson) P.E. Principal LWFW, Incl 12700 Park Central suite 1805 Dallas, Texas 75251 Dear Mr.. Thompson: Subject: Aubrey Reservoir I Feasibility Study (update) Reference is made to your letter of October 26, 1979, addressed to Mr, Ross Finley pertaining to the subJect matter. The material. requested is in the same order as in the enclosure to your latter of October 26. I. Capital Costs of Sulphur Bluff I and II i ; Updated construction cost using EN-R indices: Sulphur Bluff I - $94,3$7,400 Sulphur Bluff II $30,423,000 , Real Estate was increased in the Aame manner as for the 1973 to 1976 estimate, i IT. 0&M cost of Sulphur Bluff I and II Sulphur Bluff I - $138,900 Sulphur Bluff II - ~180900 j The cost of living index was used for the increase in this feature. III, Capital Costs of Transmission Facilities to Lake Lewisville A. Updated construction cost from Cooper to Lake Lewts-.Alle is I $53,364,006.. City of Dallas portion is $33,498,OG'0. B, gItlphur Bluff I and II - entire capacity to Elm Fork AAsume transmission from Sulphur bluff to Elm Fork (155 MGD) with ~ cost prorated between Sulphur Bluff and Cooper, The updated con- struction cost is $10100789000, ' Mr. Gary Thompson November lb, 1979 Page 2 IV. 0&M Cost of Tranmission facilities (excluding power) f if These updated amounts are shown on the revised table 4-5 enclosed. j J V. Capital Costs and 0&M Costs of Aubrey Reservoir as a "Water Supply Only" project. i The updated construction cost is $185,804,000, Updated 0&M coat using same factors as at Lake Ray Hubbard is $137,800. It is j `assumed that the City of Dallas will share cost at about 74% of which would amount to ?102,000. t VI. Power Requirements Power requirements are shown on revised table 4-5. { If I can be of further service in this matter, please call.. Very truly youra~ t URS/FORREST AND COTTON, INC. Consulting Engineers A. Mdrtelli, P,E. i Project Manager ; f i AM/pj enclosure cei Roes Finley i d r t a t r , ~J. . i TABLE NO. 4.5 TRANSMISSION FACILITIES COST SUMMARY i K1JN Distance Diameter Q Capital 001 (October. 1979) (1,000) Route (MI) (1n.) MGD Cost Excluding ($1,000) rower k' Sulphur Bluff- Cooper 4.3 72 113.6 41958 340500 163,500 Sulphur Bluff. i Cooper 413 96 228.0 8,034 38,730 31,719 Cooper-Elm C=ork 66.3 60 70.0 46,410 81,420 77,926 Cooper-Elm Fork 56.3 66 96,0 531113 90,780 1111834 i Cooper-Elm Fork 55.3 84 155.0~. 74,746 103,380 157,614 Cooper•Lavon 37.3 48 39:6 19,201 383100 29,430 'Cooper•Lavon 37,3 66 95 311627 50,160 730248 ; Cooper•Levon 37.3 72 120 34,749 55,560 92,868 i Cooper Lavon 37.3. 84 165 44,159 58,980 105, 294, Cooper. Lavon 37.3 96 212 610668 68,520 139,956 i Lavon•Clm Fork. 22.1 48 39.6 10,619 359454 19,816 Lavon•Elm Fork 22,1 72 103 20,262 433230 48,069 1.avornElm Fork 22.1 72 '120 20,672 47,100 62,130 47,640 640092 Lavom.Flm Fork 22.1 78 1315 23,986 49,980 72,594 Uvornlam. Fork 22.1 84 156 26,595 Booster-Mm Fork 17.8 72 103 19,002 36,300 22,890 Lavorngooster Site 7.0 72 96 6,774 Lavon~6oostar Site 7.0 72 120 8,190 ! 14von•Booster Site 7.0 84 165 9,422 41,124 40,417 . Palestine•E, Side 32.0 72 102 59,226 117,270 99,081 4.6 i k r. , e TAULL NO, 4.5 {con,,} KSJH Distnnce Diameter O. Capital OM Route (Mi) {In.) MGD Cost (0c.cob t- 1979) (1 ,000) _ _ - ($1,000} FXClUd f.ng Power i Mineola-Tawakoni 18.4 48 45 8,667 34,545 16,514 s Mlneola•Tawakoni 18.4 54 51 10,995 34,230 15,359 ; i i r ; Mineola•Tawakoni 18A 54 58 11,131 35)378 19,542 L Lake ForkTawakoni 20.0 60 64 13,849 35,373 .19,522 Lake Fork-Tawakoill 20,0 66 81 15,820 36, 955 25,271 ' ~r TaWakonl i .Side 32,0 66 81 27,095 37,560 27,468 Taakoni E. Side 32.0 72 651100 28,780 39, 396 34;139 l Tawakoni•E, Side 32.0 72 -0 29,634 39, 396 34,139 ` Tawakoni•E, Side ' 32.0 78 132 34,610 421870 46,761 ! Tawakoni-E, Side 32.0 90 180 40,943 45,975 580043 Tawakoni•Lavon 29.0 72 10C 24,682 42,375 44,963 Hubbard-Lavon 17,4 72 10; 15,412 39,659 34,368 i Hubbard-E. Side 3.0 90 150 3,906 66;839 Hubbard-Elm Fork 31.6 '72 103 34,685 48,360 Hubbard Elm Fork 31,6 72 120 34,6186 52,545 81,414 Penn, Col, to i Bristol 55.2 60 80 37,905 Tenn, Col, to Bristol 55,2 66 86 42,589 760218 58,925 i Tenn, Col to ; Bristol C,5.2 66 90 42,863 78,'720 58,016 Tenn, Col; to 'Bristol 55,2 72 100 46,715 Tenn, Col to i Bristol 56,2 72 108 46,853 80, 977 76,217 Tenn. Col, to " Bristol 55.2 78 136 55,468 88,024 101,821 i k ra,~' 1 y _ PI { r., 4.7 ur«. ; "TIM 7f~~"m ITRITTY1 ow-far P 1 i r L TAf1LC NO. 4.5 (ccnt.) t ' Capital 00 KW11 instance Diametrrr (19000) Route (Mi) (liti,} MGD Cost (OcCc~!>rr 1971) 1"Xclrid Up, ($1,000) i'we~ i Cann. Cni, to 92,040 115 41.2 Bristol 55,2 90 180 66,308 B, SIM to S.E. 32,700 10,0 72 120 7,992 39,000 Plant Bristol Term, 160 13,468 r Bristol term 170 13,468 Bristol Town 180 13,468 Bristol 'term, 200 14,966 Bristol Term, 233 17,434 S;E, Plant-E. Side 10.0 78 661132 11,346 $.E, Terminal 102 12,053 i t Bristoi•S,E. Term. 10.E go 80/160 14,279 10,8 50 86/170 14,279 3fi,876 24,983 Brlstol•S,E. Term, s 37,693 , 27,952 i 1018 90 90/180 14,41 Brlstal•S,E, Term, 2841 15,:165 37 038 $ s Bristol•S,E. Term. 10.8 96 100/200 390313 33,838 i~ristoi-S.E. Term, 10.8 g6 1Q8/21P 15,639 i 10.8 I02 1361272 17,631 421870 46,761 Bristol-S,S, Term, 1 , 4'r3 4 f y' 1 1 I AUB EY FEASIBILITY STUDY STEERING COMMITTEE DECEMBER 3 2,00 PM - 4;30 PM , i is RECAP ACTIVITIES SINCE LAST MEETING 2tOG 2;30 • FORREST AND COTTON UPDATE - BILL • AUSTIN MEETING - CHRIS/CAM I LLfr ! CORPS ACTIVITIES - TOM/BILL ! DEPENDABLE YIELD MODEL RUNS - CLARENCE ! FINANCIAL ANALYSIS MODEL DEVELOPMENT - GARY 2. DISCUSSION OF FINANCING 2;30 3;45 v REVIEW WHAT NEEDS TO,BE FINANCED - BILL j ' • DISCUSSION OF FINANCING ALTERNATIVES - FRANK/LEWIS IMPACT OF AUBREY/ALTERNATIVES ON CITIES' FINANCIAL POSITION ALTERNATIVES, RATES AND TERMS FOR NON-CORP PROJECTS 3, REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS MODEL IRA 345 - 430 )iII • ASSUMPTIONS E • CALCULATIONS ' 4. SCHEDULE NEXT MEETING TO REVIEW RESULTS OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS` • DECEMBER 17 - AM • DECEMBER 18 - PM f, • DECEMBER 19 - ANY TIME ! DECEMBER 20 - ANY TIME ~ Yr ;r I r r , 3 ~ k ASSUMPTIONS FOR THIS RUM 1 *J CAPITAL COSTS WILL BE 1U4 PERCENT OF EXPECTED 0llHATINO ANO MAINTENANCE COSTS WILL. Be 100 PERCENT ON EXPECTED INFLATION RATE WILL HE 4,002 PERCENT } ENERGY COST INFLATION RATE WILL HE 6.000 PERCENT + fir ~ _ . _ w 4 r _ t f 91 A" tai? f COST MODEL FOR LAKE AUBREY YEAR CAPITAL COSTS OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS SAFE TOTAL COST PER YIELD COST 1L1d~6616 ) GALLONS RESERVOIR RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION RESERVOIR TRANSMISSION POWER IIMME01 (DEFER) USAGE RATE. COST j 1967 8409, 06 33261 1053, 79, 56000. 33.08 18529 53,60 14720. 475 1988 8409, 06 33266 10950 020 560000 3506 1964, 53.53 148766 076 1989 8409, 0, 3326, 11390 65, 56000. 37,17 2081. 53,46 15041, 077 j490 8409# Or 3326, 11849 890 56000, 39940 2206, $3.39 15215. 616 1991 8409• Of 33260 12320 92, 560000 41,76 23390 53,31 15398, 479 1992 8409, 04 3326, 1281, 9641 56000, 44127 2479. 53,25 155916 980 J 1993 8409, 0, 3326, 13324 1006 560004 46,92 2628, 53618 157950 681 1994 84091 09 3326, 1386. 104, 56000, 49.74 2785, 53411 160100 983 1995 8409. 0, 3326, 14411 108, 560000 52972 29539 53x04 16237, x84 1996 8409• 00 33260 1499, 1120 560000 55489 3130, 52,97 164764 #85 4- _ 3317# 52090 239641 1,24 1997 8409, 7236, 3326. 15590 ...._.117. 56000, ._.,..59,2 1996 84091 7236, 3326, 1,6214 I22# 560000 62,80 35170 52.83 242511 1026 4 199Q 84094 7236, 3326, 1686e 126• 56000, 66.56, 3718. 52,76 24411, 1427 %2000 84091 72361 3326, 17540 1310 56000, 70,56' 39510 524139 7x808, 1.29 2001 84090 72360 33264 18241 1370 56000, 7409 4188', 5'1.•63 25120, 101 2002 84096 _ 7236o 33260 1897, 142, 56000, 79,28 4440. 521,56 25450, 103 2003...8409• 7236, _ .3328. 1973, 148,,-- 56000,._.._ 84,03..__.-4706.,..-. 52,49 25798. 1435 2004 6409, 7236, 3326# 2052s 1540 560004 89008 4988, 52,42 261650 1637 2005 64090 72360 3326, 21340 160• 56000, 94,42 52889 52935 265530 1,39 2006 8409, 7236• 3326. 2219, 166. 56000, 100,09 56050 52428 269¢1 1041 'I 200'1 8409, 1236, 3326, 2308, 173, 56000, 106,09 59410 52021 27393. 1,44 2008 8409. 7236, 3326. 24000 180, 56000, 112046 6298. 52x14 27649, 1346 2009 8409, 7236, 3326, 2496, 187, 56000•119,20.. 66754, ,52,08,. 203301 1,49 3010 8409, 72364 33266 2596, 195. 560000 126,36 7076, 52x01 2683do •1,52 { 2011 84090 7236, 33251 2700, 203, 56000, 13304 1501, 51994 293740 1055 ' 2012 0409. 72361 3326 . 2808. 2110 56000, 141.97 19514 51,87 299411 1058 1 Ef 2013 0409, 7236, 33260 24210 219, 56000, 150.49 8428, 51080 305384 -1062 2014 8409, 72360 33266 3037, 2280 $6000, 159,52 8933. 51,74 31170, 1,65 l ` 2015 :.8409. 7?-364 33260 3159, 237, 56000. 169,09__.44.69x. _ 51067 31836, 1x69 r s2016 84094 7236, 3326. 32850 2460 -560000 119,24 10037, 51.60 325400 1,73 2017 8409, 12369 00 34170 2560 560004 189499 106401 51453 29958# 1.59 2018 8409, 72366 00 3554, 26T, 56000, 201,39 112780 51447 30744, 1164 2019 84090 7236, Of 36966 2774 660000 ?13048 11955, 51,40 31573, 1068 2020 6404# 7236. 00 3844, 288# 560000 126429 126724 $1633 32449, 1073 r 20?1 84090 '1236, 01 _ 39980 3006 56000, 239406 13432, 51026 333750 1478 2022 8409• '1236• 0e 4158, 312. 56000, 254,25 141381 51420 343534 1084 1;61" 2023 84091 72364 Of 43240 324, x60000 269.$1 15093. 51013 353864 1090 J - cj 2024 8409, 72360 00 4497. 3374 56000. 281ir68 159980 51006 364780 1696 2025 9409, 7236, 00 46774 3514 560006 30'x,'.82 16950, 51000 376310 2002 2049 :d 2026 8409, 7236, 00 48644 365o 560900 320.99 •17975• 50,43 393500 Zt 202# 84090 7238, 00 50594 3790 56000. 340025 19054. 50.86 40138, 2#16 4x" 2078 8404. 7236# 04 5261# 3950 560004 360.67 20197, 50060 414980 2624 ; 2029 84096 72364 0# 54720 410, 560004 382,31 214990 50073 429376 2432 I`J lj 2030 84091 72360 06 56916 427. 960006 405,24 ?"26'340 50066 444576 2049 ' 2031 8400, 12364 06 59190 444, 560006 429056 24055, 50.60 460630 2449 2032 b4090 7236# 00 61556 462, 560001 455033 25499. 50453 417610 2059 ti+► 2033 8409# 72360 04 6402, 41(01 56000, 482#65 270280 50646 49556, 2469 f n ii 2034 84094 7236, 04 6658, 4999 56000, 511061 286S0, 50140 51453, 2080 i" 1035 84090 72364 04 6924# 019, 56000# 54$x31 30369. 50433 534580 2#91j ' 2036 84091 7236, Or 7202, 5400 56000, 574.85 3219le 80427 555164 3003 2037 Or 12364 00 7490, 5624 566006 609#34 3412.30 $0620 49410, 2670 -V x038 00 72360 0# 7'1896 5846 56000, 645,90 36170. 50613 81180, 2083 4~ rl " 2039 00 72360 Or 8101, 6080 560004 684#65 38340, 150607 542,85# 2097, i Y 9040 00 12366 00 84250 6320 560004 725x7'3 40641., 50600 569344 3412 2041 0e 72364 00 8763, 657# 560004 76962' 430790 49#94 597356 3,''e r4 2042 00 72360 04 91130 6834 56000, 815#4;1 4'5664# 49#87 6'26910 3044 2043 01 72360 00 9478, 7114 56000, 86406 484046 49681 65829# 3,62 2044 09 7236. 06 98570 1396 51,0004 916,22 513086 49074 681414 3481 J M V~~~ k'k1S~'litkfLFit~VROfJf i$R p e',r.h . , .:.i, i„~,~~ ` l'~i~ \ ~ ~djl h ` f` V I A{ i , 15 ! - - - - - -u~;rcc1 -•Mry~`yu' r., c~:~w::~AJiC.« ..w~'.'~.N.S4"r ' - 6L_4Si__1 .C1~L.1~.~Le.l_LS_-._ up- -i Al' 1 - - It- - , - - - l- y - ` rrf , _s - - - - - - S-- - -1- 9 - - L - - 'r- - i pla 4?42.1NLI.AT)L - - - - - - - uo- I h t _ a f AGENDA AUBREY STEERING COMMITTEE 1 DECEMBER 20, 1979 1;30 PM - 4:30 PM REVIEW ACTIVITIES SINCE LAST MEETING 1:30-2:00 0 CORP MEETINGS - TOM i DEPENDABLE YIELD MODEL - CLARENCEQ~`I r t 7 7 A ` A TP&L MEETING - GARY 00 •r 3c.~ 4e FIB ECONOMIST MEETING - GARY 2, REVIEW OF FINANCIAL MODEL ASSUMP~rIONS - BILL/IRA 2:00-2:30 1 i r 3. PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS RESULTS - BILL 2:303:30 4. RECAP OF ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS REQUIRED - GARY 3,30-4:00 } } E. ; 51' DI5CUS5 PLAN FOR COMPLETING PROJECT - GARY 4;00-4:30 1 • TIME/AGENDA OF 12/27 MEETING • TIMING OF ADDITIONAL PRESENTATION o TIMING OF DRAFT FINAL REPORT f i k s .I F' r` I s ASSUMPTIONS - CORPS PROJECTS } s ESTIMATES AND TERMS PER COk.:)S OF ENGINEERS PROPOSED CONTRACT • TIMING OPERATIONAL IN 1990 - WATER USAGE BEGINS IN 1995 } - DEFERRED WATER USAGE BEGINS IN 2000 f - CAPITAL COSTS INFLATED TO MID POINT OF CONSTRUCTION PERJOD i I YIELD AUBREY SAFE YIELD IS 71 MGD j I AUBREY AVERAGE YIELD IS 41,3 MGD COOPER AVERAGE YIELD BETWEEN 15 MGD AND 39,5 MGD t • RECREATION - CORPS "OPTIMUM RECREATION r' USED FOR. AUBREY j f FUTURE RECREATION FACILITIES BUILT IN 2000 - RECREATION COSTS INCLUDED IN COST OF WATER INCOME FROM RECREATION NOT CONSIDERED i h 3 I L i ASSUMPTIONS - LOCAL PROJECTS s RESERVOIR FINANCING 4 MONEY BORROWED AT BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION ' - 40 YEARS WITH INTEREST ONLY FOR FIRST 10 YEARS, THEN LEVEL PAYMENTS OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST 7.5% INTEREST - INCOME FROM INVESTMENTS OFFSETS 10 YEARS OF INTEREST PAYMENTS j CAPITAL COSTS INFLATED TO END OF CONSTRUCTION PERIOD s TRANSMISSION FINANCING 30 YEARS WITH LEVEL PAYMENTS OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST FINANCING AND CONSTRUCTION IN SAME YEAR r r • MINIMAL RECREATIONAL FACILITIES • POWER USAGE VARIES WITH WATER VOLUME k I i V z 1 i r Y 1 i i ASSUMPTIONS - SENSITIVITIES 6 GENERAL INFLATION OPTIMISTIC: 6% FOR NEXT 15 YEARS 4% THEREAFTER EXPECTED: 8% FOR NEXT 15 YEARS i. THEREAFTER t PESSIMISTIC:10% FOR NEXT 15 YEARS So THEREAFTER' t E r . ENERGY INFLATION, ` 125a OF GENERAL INFLATION FOR NEXT 15 YEARS z s i 100% OF GENERAL INFLATION THEREAFTER l i . j w CAPITAL. COST OPTIMISTIC; 100% OF ESTIMATE EXPECTED: 1'1.50 OF ESTIMATE PES5 MISTIC: 150% OF ESTIMATE • OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE: E 1002 OF ESTIMATE j i • I I TOTAL EXPENDITURES OVER TIME AUBREY (CORPS) I f f' E ~i ~I _ I I E _ _ _ . T- i a Zqo ~ zam oF, CaprrAL f' !AT1 rf`~V„7 111 ..a .n. ......n.__ , _1+ .ter..,. L.: 1 f , FLRAT 1 .A! jI31 TOTAL EXPENDITURES OVER TIME SULPHUR BLUFF I & II I j .z '10 a f ~aCF3f1~,~DCTU~.~ ! { G { 1 _ f , , • f ! Y. t i f _ 2010 I 1 , ,.,.-...a,eA.arr»u,rz+r sws a-~YFK.ar n\.me>w a.n•~avi I t_ • ► , n GALLONS OF COSYTHOUSAN F WATER I --F I i i 1I IIIk _ I i i - - R I { yr r~ ~w ~ t 1 ~ E .«.._..,..1.1..x.. ~ o0 2a,~~o_ 050..- 10. x,980 .:-_......1 90, . . 200 0 2 20~ ' t I , I I l ~I u,..•t ae,.r, _na.u bdt4v snt M1a nvt%,\ +..1 arr h r C. i i ~ T/THOUSAfJD, GALLaNS . aF 41ATER ~ _ COS i ` t , Q i t. 111 . _ . I .:Isa zoo .2000 2Q1o .,..2 20.ado - 20 a 2050, , . WMpl4Ly41'i Y.[:IAll..yl"Hn.. V r ~ ~ COST/T~fOUSI-IfJD 'GALLONS of WATER i i r ! , S i cn-. , , . , a.. a;.r 1990 , . ~ . r, , _ .....,~sao.- 2100...... 2610 .2 2 0 2 30 ..-.--2a5o 2043 - 1 1 . +M r f f t I I ' cnsYTHauSAND GALLONS OF WATER IF r , a I ; f r t r ~ 1 I I I l ri Ma 1 SO J990 200.0 , 2010.., 2 20 2P30 2QuO.. 2Q5n } ~ ~r.rrwww. I t ! ~ { ! k 1 f i I PRESENT VALUE "ONE DOLLAR IN HAND TODAY IS WORTH MORE THAN THE PROMISE OF THAT DOLLAR ONE YEAR FROM N04d REASONS: I --INFLATION { 2 - OPPORTUNITY COST (PRIVATE SECTOR) SOCIAL RATE OF DISCOUNT (PUBLIC SECTOR) I 3 RISK PREMIUM f { 00 _ 11.E ;f ,S3C ,t i'• I I ~ r I• ! I,y co 40 I r j ' I 1 rr• r woo 7l>/O 2029 '1030 2CaQ0 ?DSO f ~AL1llF. Oi= ~hE u_At? .C ~N~t b `ro p•ESCuT VAWE- mwa+.:.a9~.SUiY~v+raa1f14~YR KUdH,pf~„c}µ~y 4Ys ris, t...-ir.{w+e..v+.,,...,... . _ .1'•:.1,1 ,k, r..,,, ~ rev ~ 1 f {~Mc~c to E i Wes; ' r `IA r I , r • 69 I ~ I l f I f ~ 11 I I i f ' { II I + kimm I s I 1 1 ~ i I I" AuEtix~ L{ • I I j i~ f f I i k i~ i ; r i a J 1 } i ~ , I I ± II I i ~ I I I! I~ I I ~ f~ ~ i II I k 1 i I 4 r _1 I I { ~ f r I I I 1 i { i } I. f,~ ~ 1 i + ~ t r , I ' I r I i ~ f I b. I 20'30 20! I f I ; r IMPACT OF VARIOUS ASSUMPTIONS CUMULATIVE PRESENT VALUE /THOUSAND GALLONS OVER NFXI 70 YEARS r _I.AIF-L~~(1N_ 6% FIRST 15 YRS 8% FIRST 15 YRS 10% FIRST 15 YRS _ AFTER 6 o tU REAFuR AUBREY (CORPS) $16 12 009 , AUBREY (LOCAL) 23 119 116 ~ 100% SULPHUR BLUFF I .26 ,24 422 SULPHUR BLUFF I & I I X20 419 ,18 w' COOPER ,21 .20 ,20 r a : - - w ' . AUBREY (CORPS) 419. X14 010 ,20 .29 024 r~ U AUBREY (LOCAL) 25 125% SULPHUR BLUFF I .30 ,27 SULPHUR BLUFF I & II ,23 21 ' COOPER X23 .22 121 a .22 .16 AUBREY (CORPS) .24 AUBREY (LOCAL) 135 X28 150% SULPHUR BLUFF I 34 130 28, i. ' 22 ~ I SULPHUR BLUFF I & II X26 23 COOPER 125 23 22 r.nu.x! WrhSW IaWO] rr.. .ur. c. r.r tl. W'il..r.r .r, ✓ol,.n ._.v VnrIF!)Hi4N+'+4Y 6dT'An ir.N. liu4RYl r>.ISf a.......... qi.r ..rr. r tr Y VARIOUS ASSUMPTIONS USING AVEBAE YIELD CUMULATIVE PRESENT VALUE 1[` $/TEIOUSAND GALLONS OVER NEXT 70 YEARS r _ I PIFLAT I QiV_._..~.w_..•_. 6% FIRST . YRS r Sao FIRST 15 YRS 10% FIRST 15 YRS AUBREY (CORP) 41,3 MGD 26 119 SARK YIELD ,21 ,20 ,20 100% COOPER 20 IND 0 39 37 , 36 49 50 15 MGD ,52 N t . LL, AUBREY (CORP) 11,3 MGD ,22 .17 SAFE YIELD ,23 ,22 ,21 125% COOPER 20 MGU ,~13 ,40 '3t~ ca- E 15 MGD ,57 53 ,52 ti ° AU$REY (CORP) 41,3 MGD 136 5 119 u 4 SAFE YIELD ,25 ,24 023 150% COOPER 20IlGU 40 ,~53 ,41 15 MGM 62 157 , 55 r 'www<.1M+AYMwitlJA'.4tKVd}y.j~.y.Ah,<{Vi+(HY+tF S~at+.iro%++^+"^'"' ` 4. i TRENDS 3 AUBREY LOOKS BETTER AS. • GENERAL INFLATION INCREASES s ENERGY INFLATION INCREASES j j 0 CAPITAL COSTS ARE LOWER r (I.E., CLOSER TO ESTIMATE) it I r • AUBREY SAFE YIELD INCREASES t f s AUBREY LOCAL COSTS DECREASE i • EAST TEXAS AVERAGE YIELDS DECREASE f 4. r i 1 S 1 1 FURTHER REFINEMENTS CHANGES IN ASSUMPTIONS } AUBREY RECREATION PLAN AUBREY SAFE YIELD 4 E YIELDS } AvRAG - DISCOUNT PATE CHANGES IN SENSITIVITIES GENERAL INFLATION RATE ~ s 3 ENERGY INFLATION RATS - CAPITAL COSTS - OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS } { i I L MEETING NOTES Bill Groben Economist First National Bank • Dallas area inflation higher than U.3. average over next 5 years - especially real estate. • It appears inflation is baing "institutionalized." This leads to expected long-term rates in the 6~-8$-10$ range. • Energy costs in real terms will rise faster than general inflation until they reach a level of alternative energy sources 20 years. • Discount Rate - case can be made for using th,P long--term s Government Bond rate - traditionally greater than the long--term inflationary expectations, j Mike Oz m Manager-of Customer Services, TP&L • Eloctrlc rate is made up of two componenta,'fuel r adjt'stment and base rate (KWH charge). E • Fuel adjustment has run 1.3-1.40/KWH in 1979. ~J { • Base rate is 1.050/KWH. z s r h I • Fuel adjustment projected to be about 1.5-1.6~/KWH in 1980 and 1.7-1.8~/KWH in 1981. After this, the fuel adjustment component will probably stabilize due to "locked" in fuel costs. • Comanche Peak Nuclear - 2300 MW - 1981,183 Martin Lake - Lignite - 750 MW - 1985 Forest Grove - Lignite 750 MW - 1984 Twin Oak - Lignite 1500 MW - 1984,86 Sandow - Lignite - 545 Miel - 1981 i Lignite supplies good for next 30-40 years with future l coal supplies owned in New Mexico. These. fuel commitments i should limit the growth in this component of the,rate to the, level WE yuneral inflation or less. Mike €eols a y 10% annual increase for this component is ver con:serva- f . tiVe. 1 a Base Rate, This component for the Water Pumping Rate Class has not traditionally yielded an acceptable rate I j of return. -Because of this and the philosophy of the PUC'1 this component could rise fasten than general inflation. (It would need to double today to yield the average required RJR.) In addition, the long-term casts.of Government Regulation will require base rate increases of., 2-4% above inflation for the foreseeable future# s 1979 rate for purposes of the Financial Analysis is 4 2.44/XWH. j 1 f l k w i M;. vl 1 V ASSUMPTIONS FOR THIS RUN ~i CAPITAL Cn m WILL OF 125 PERCE14T OF EXPECTED OPERATING. AND MAINTENANCE CCSTS WILL BE 100 PERCE14T OF EXPECTED INFLATION RATE WILL OE A PERCENT FOR THE FIRST 15 YEARS THEREAFTER IT WILL ©E 6 PERCENT ENERGY COST INFLATION RATE WILL OF 10.00 PERCENT FOR THE FIRST 15 YEARS x THEREAFTER IT WILL RE 6 PERCENT ~ I ' L i. i I s. ~i I I k i i r 4 f C,ISI' MODEL FOR LAKE AUDREY/CORPS YEAR f,APITAL COSTS OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS RESF.RVR RESEP.VR TRANSMISS RESERVR TAANSMISS POWER IIMMEDI (DEFERI USAGE. RATE -:DST YIELD TOTAL COST COST/K-GAS MI pl SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT I990 11763 0 0 1734 0 0 0 040 0 0 0.00 0100 13497 13497 0.00 0.00 1991 11763 0 0 1A73 0 0 0 000 0 0 0,00 0400 13636 13636 0.00 0.00 ,f 1992 11763 0 0 2023 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0,DO 0000 13786 13706 000 0,00 1993 11763 0 0 2104 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0400 0100 13949 13448 0.00 0,00 1994 11763 0 0 2359 0 0 0 010 0 0 0,00 0.00 14123 14123 0,00 0400 1995 11763 0 0 2501 0 U 0 96.6 0 0 36,21 34,21 14264 14264 1,00 1408 1996 11763 0 0 2651 0 0 0 102,4 0 0 36621 36421 14414 14414 1.09 1,09 1997 11763 0 0 7010 0 0 0 10805 0 0 36,21 36,21 14573 14572 1,10 1,10 1998 11763 0 0 2979 0 0 0 11501 6 0 366Z1 36,21 14142 14742 1,12 1412 1949 11763 0 0 3157 0_11 G 0 1?.240 0 0 ,36.21 36.21 14921 _ 14921 1413 t, 13, 2000 11763 10095 0 3347 0 0 0 12943 0 0 70,54 41,30 25206 25206 .98 1,67 1a 2001 11763 10095 0 3546 0 0 0 137.0 0 0 70644 41130 25407 25407 .99 1,69 200211763 10095 0 3761 0 0 0 14543 0 0 70.85 41.30 25620 25620 1,00 1,70 2003 11763 10095 0 3986 0 _ 0 U 154,0 0 0 70.26 41,30 25845 25045 1..01 1.71 2004 11763 10095 0 4225 0 0 0 163,2 0 0 70.17 41.30 26084 26084 1.02 -1,73 2005 11763 10095, 0 _ 4479 0 0 0 173.0 0 0 ?0408 41.30 26338 26336 1403 105 2006 11763 1OQ95 0 4748 0 0 0 163.4 0 0 69698 41,30 26607 26607 1604 1477 2007 11743 10095 U 5033 0 0 0 194.4 0 0 69,09 41.30 26092 2489?. 1.05 1.78 f~ 2008 11763 20095 0 5335 0 C 0 206,1 0 0 69,00 41.30 27194 27194 1407 1.00 2009` 11763 10095 0 5655 0 0 0 218.4 0 0 69671 4L,30 27514 27!%14 108 1,83 2010 11163 10095 0 5994 0 0 0 231.5 0 U 69.62 41,30 27853 27853 1410 1,85 2011 11763 10095 0 6354 . 0 0. 02454 4 0 0 69953 41,30 20213 28213, 1.11 1487 2012 11763 1,0095 0 6735 0 0 0 26041 0 0 69,44 41.30 20594 28594 1.13 1,90 2013 117,63 10095 0 7139 0 0 0 27549 0 0 69,34 41,30 28998 28996 1.15 1.52 { 2014 11163 10095 0 7568 0 0 0 29?.3 0 0 69,25 41.30 294?6 19426 1.16 105 Y r 2015 11763 10095 0 6M, 0 0 0 309.0 0 0 69,16 41,30 2908129881 1.18 1,98 a 2018 11763 10095 0 9554 0 0 0 369,0 0 0 60,84 41130 3I413 71413 1025 2,08 M7 11763 10095 0 9013 2419 11163 10095 0 10187 0 0 0 391.2 0 0 68980 4100 31986 31986 I,27 2912 -L i 202Q 11163 10095 0 10735 0 0 0 414.6 0 0 60,71 4100 32594 32594 1.3U 2.16 207.1 11763 10.095 0 11379 0 0 0 439.5 0 0 68.62 41.30 33230 33238 1.33 2,20 2022 11763 10095 0 12062 0 0 0 465,9 0 0 69,53 41,30 33921 33921 1,36 2.25 S 2023 11763 10095 0 12705 0 0 0 49308 0 0 60444 41,30 34644 34644 1,39 200 t 2024 ,12163 10095 0 13553 0 0 0 523,5 0 0 68.35 41.30 35412 35412 1.42 2,35 2025 11763 10095 0 14366 0 0 0 55409 0 0 60.26 41,30 36229 36295 1,45 2.40 2026 11763 10095 0 15228 0 0 0 58802 0 0 61.17 41,30 37007 37087 1.49 2.46. 2tl27 11763 10095 0 16142 0 0 0 623,5 0 0 60108 41630 38000 38000 1453 2652 2023 11763 10095 0 17110 0 0 0 660,9 0 0 67.99 41.30 38949 38969 1.57 2459 202911763 - 10095 0 13137. 0 0 0 70005 0 0 67.91 41.30 _ 39996 39996 I.61 2,65 { 2030 11763 10095 0 19225 0 n 0 742,5 0 0 67,82 41.30 41004 41084 1,66 2,73 2031 11763 10095 0 20378 0 0 0 707,1 0 0 67.71 41,70 42237 42231 1,71 2&00 2032 11.763 10095 0 11601 0 0 0 03413 0 0 67,64 41.30 40460 43460 1,1'6' 2.03 2033 .11763 10095 0 22897 0 0 0 804,4 0 0 67,55 41,30 44756 44756 1.82 2,97 S 2034 11761 10095 0 24271 0 0 0 937.4 0 0 67.46 41.30 46130 46130 1,87 3406 ~ 2035 11769 10095 0 2.577.7 0 0 0 993,7 0 0 67.37 41.30 47586 ,47506 I,94 3416 2036 11763 1OC45 0 27271 0 0 0 1053,3 0 0 67.?0 41,30 49130 49130 2,00 3,26 ! ?037 11763 10095 0 28907 0 0 0 1116.5 0 0 67420 41.30 50766 5D766 2407 3,37 2030 11763 10095 0 30642 0 0 0 118305 0 0 67.11 41.30 5250). 52501 2,14 3.40 ; 203Q?11763 10095 0 32480 0 0 0 125405 0 0 67,02 41.30 54339 54319 2,22 3.60 7040 0 10095 0 344?9 0 0 0 132.9,8 0 0 66.93 4100 44525 44525 1.82 2.95 Z041 _0 10099 0 .16495 0 0 0 1409.6 0 0 66,05 41.30 46'1)91 46591 .1.91 3,04 2042 0 10095 0 30685 0 0 0 1494.1 0 0 66,76 41,30 46780 43700 2Y,90 '..24 2043 ' 0 10095 0 41006 0 0 0 158310 0 0 66.67 41,30 51102 51102 '.10 5,39 2044 0 100,75 0 43466 0 0 0 1678.4 0 0 66,58 41,30 53562 53562 1,20 3655 I, 2045 0 10095 0 46074 0 0 0 1779,5 0 D 66450 41.11,0 56170 56110 2,31 3.13 2046 0 10095 0 48039 0 0 0 188613 0 0 66,41 41.30 58934 58934 ?..43 3.91 7047 0 10095 0 5176() 0 0 0 1999,5 0 0 6602 41.30 61861 61665 2,56 4'.10 COST MODEL FOR LAKE AUDREYILOCAL i YFAR CAPITAL COSTS OPERATING AND MAT1tTENANr,E COSTS POKER RE$EPYR RESERVR TPANSM:SS RESE M, TRANSMISS " ` (IMMF.0) (OEFERf USAGE: RATE CUST YIELD TOTAL COST C35TlK-GALNS SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT SAFF PROJECT SAFE PROJECT 1990 42455 0 0 297 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0.00 42753 42753 x',.00 0.00. E 1991 42455 0 0 321 0 0 0 040 0 0 0600 0000 42717 42777 0.00 0.00 j) 1992 42455 0 0 347 0 0 0 060 J 0 0.00 0.00 42002 42802 0,00 0.00 0 374 0 0 0 D.0 0 0 0.00 0400 42630 42030 0.00 0.00 1994 4245 0 0 404 0 0 0 000 0 0 0.00 0.00 42060 42860 0400 0.00 0 1995 42455 0 0 429 0 0 0 9696 0 0 62.50 41430 4?884 42884 1.98 Z.8ti 0 454 0 0 0 10?..4 0 0 62.42 41.30 42918 42910 1108 2.85 j 1996 x2455 0 0 481. 0 0 0 10015 0 0 62,34 41.30 42938 42938 1.89 2.05 1997 42455 0 1999 42455 0 0 510 0 0 0 11501 0 0 82.25 41.30 4?.9bC+ 42966 1.89 2.85 1999 42455 0 0 541 0 D .0 _ 122.0 _ 0 D 62.17 4100 42997 42947 1499 2.05 l - 2000 42455 0 0 574 0 0 0 12913 0 0 62.09 41.30 43030 43030 1490 2#05 2001 42455 0 0 608 0 0 0 137.0 0 0 62.01 41.30 43064 43064 1.90 2.86 2002 42455 0 0 b45 0 0 0 14503 0 0 6103 41.30 41101 43.101 1.91 2,06 t 2003 42455 0 0 663 0 0 0 15440 0 0 61605 41.30 43139 43139 1.91 2.86 7004 42458 0 3 724 0 0 0 163.2 0 0 61.77 41430 43180 41180 1.92 2.66 " I °2005 42455 0 0 768 0 0 0 173.0 0 0 61.69 41.30, 43224 43224 1492 2407 2606 42455 0 0 814 0 0 0 163.4 0 0 61.61 41.30 43270 43270 1.92 ?.87 2007 42455 0 0 863 0 0 0 19444 0 0 b1.5? 41.30 43319 43319 1x93 2.07 * 200@ 42`159 0 0 915 Q 0 0 20601 0 0 61.44 41.30 43371 43311 1.93 2.88 2009 42455 0 0 969 0 0 0 21014 0 0 6106 41.30 41425 43425 1.94 2.88 0 1029 0 0 0 231.5 0 0 61.20 41.30 43404 43484 1.94 2.89 2010 42455 0 D i2q 1 42455 0 0 1009 0 0 0 24544, 0 0 61.20 -41.30 43945. 43545 1.95 2.89 2012 42455 0 0 1155 0 0 0 W tl 0 0 61.12 41.30 43611 43611 1.95 209 2013 42455 0 0 1224 0 0 0 275.8 0 0 61.04 41.30 43680 43600 1496 200 . 2014 42455 0 0 1298 0 0 0 292.3 0 0 60.96 41.30 43754 43794 1.97 2,90_ 2015 42455 0 0 1375 0 0 0 30900 0 0 60.08 41.30 43831 43631 1697 2.91 2017 4M5 0 0 2018 42455 0 0 1458 0 0 0 0 340.1 32844 0 0 6000 41.30 43914 43914 1.96 20A 2018 42459 0 0 1638.. _ b ~ 0 369.0 0 0 60.74 41•30 44094 44094 1.94 293 t ' 0 604? 41,30 W01 4100l 1*99 ~097 2019 42455 0 0 1737 0 0 0 39142 0 0 60.56 41.30 44193 44193 2.00 203 2020 0 0 0 1R41 0 0 0 414.6 0 0 60.40 41.30 1841 1841 .08 .12 ?021 0 0 0 1951 0 0 0 439.5 0 0 60.41 4100 1951 1951 109 •013 2022 0 0 0 2068 0 0 0 465.9 0 0 60.33 41.30 2068 2069 .09 .14, 93 .10 .15 2023 0 0 0 2193 0 0 0 493.8 0 0. 60.25 „ 4100 2193 2 L 1 .13 2024 0 0 0 2324 0, 0 0 523.5 0 0 60.17 41.30 2324 2324 .il .1N 2025 0 0 0 ?.464 0 0 0 554.9 0 0 60.09 41.30 2164 2464 i 0 2611 0 0 0 588.? 0 0 60.01 41.30 2611 2611 012 .17 ' 2086 A 0 0 !'19.43 41.30 2766 2768 .13 .14 2077 0 0 0 2768 0 0 0 623.5 Q 2028 0 0 0 2934 0 C 0 66049 0 0 59.85 41030 2934 9114 *15 .z1 2029 0 0 0 3110 0 0 0 700.5,_.._ 0 0 59.70 41430 3110 200 0 0 0 3'10,5+ 0 0 0 59.62 41,30 3M 3499 s 16 421 2031 0 0 0 3495 0 0 0 707 1 0 0 834.3 0 0 59.54 41430 3705. 3927 •19 .Zt' 2032 3927 0 D 0 1184.4 0 0 59.46 +1.30 39?.7 2 2033 0 0 0 203 0 937.4 0 0 59.39 41 930 30 4412 4412 .120 9 0.2 5 0 0 0 4 163 0 G ~ ~ 203° 0 0 0 4412 0, 0, 0 993.7 0 0 59.31 41* 30 2'036 0 0 0 4677 0 0 0 1053.3 0 0 59.23 41,30 4677 4677 .22 •3 2037 0 0 0 4958 0 0 0 111665 0 0 59.15 41.30 4958 4958 .23 .3 2039 D 4 0 5255 0 0 0 1183.5 0 0 59.07 41.30 5255 $?55 .24 N~i ?031 0 0 0 5571 0 0 0 1254.5 0 0 59.00 4100 5571 5571 .?6 i s 2044 0 0 0 51905 0 0 0 1329.0 0 0 511.92 41430 5905 5905 .27 .37 2041 0 0 0 6259 0 0 0 1409.6 0 0 5600`1 41430 66059 6259 .29 '04 35 6233 431 •411 204? 0 0 0 6635 0 0 0 1494,1 0 0 58.77 41.30 2043 0 0 0 7033 0 0 0 1503.8 0 0 59.69 41030 7013 7031 .33 44 2044 0 0 0 7455 0 0 0 1670.9 0 0 50.61 4100 7455 7455 05 .4 2045 0 0 0 7902 0 0 0 177945 0 0 58053 41.30 7902 7902 637 .51j, 2046 0 0 0 0376 0 0 0 1686.3 0 0 50.46 41.30 8376 6316 .39 .51 @874 .42 . 0 19`.19:?.. 0 0 ,58138 41.30 0819 5'i 2041 o o: 4.. n679. _.4... r I 0 1 1l tdF iy COST MODFL FOR LAKE SLPNR OLF I r YEAR CAPITAL COSTS OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS RE$ERVR RI:SCRVR TRANSMISS RESCRVR TRANSMISS J)D1+1ER (IMM M (OFFER) USAGE RATE COST YIELD TOTAL COST COSTIK-6ALNS SAFE 1'R(JFCT SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT 1 19x5 3)107 0 0 432 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0000 31535 31`+35 0.00 0,40 11,96 31102 0 0 458 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0000 0.00 31560 37560 0400 0.04 1 1997 31302 0 0 405 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.00 0.00 31500 31588 0.00 0,00 1990 31102 0 0 515 0 0 0 060 0 0 0000 0.00 31617 31617 0,'JO 0600 31648 31440 0.00 0000 1 1999 31102 0 0 545 0 0 0 010 0 0 0.00 0,()o ~i 2000 31)02 0 44572 578 517 32415? 46239 129.3 16050 5977 107.40 40.00 92622 82740 207 5,67 1 2001 31102 0 44572 613 540 123909 46239 137,0 16991 6336 107.26 40.00 9387.9 83174 2,40 5,70 1.002 31102 0 44577 650 581 123026 462.39 145,3 !7907 6716 107412 40,00 94894 0'3023 2,43 5,71 2003 31102 0 44572 689 616 l?3664 46239 154,0 19441 7119 106.98 40.00 96022 04100 2,46 5.16 2004 31302 0 44572 730 653 )?3507 46239 16342 20157 7547 106.84 40.00 97217 84606 2.49 5,79 2005 31102 0 44572 774 692 123340 46239 173,0 21339 7999 106,70 40.00 90401 85142 2653 5,83 2006 31102 0 44572 820 734 123179 46239 163.4 22590 0479 106.56 40.00 99820 85710 2,57 5,07 ,•L 2007 81102 0 4457? 070 778 123017 46239 194,4 23914 8988 106,42 40.00 101237 06311. 2.61 5.91 ZOO$ 31102 0 44572 922 024 122856 46239 206.1 25315 952'1 106.20 40.00 102738 86950 2,65 5.96 2009 31102 0 44572 977 1174 122699 46239 278,4 ?6799 10099 106.14 40,00 104376 07627 2,69 6.00 2010 31102 0 44572 1036 925 12?535 46239 ?3145 28370 10705 106.00 40,00 106008 68344 2.74 6,05 2011 31102 0 44577 1098 M. 122374 4623q 21, 544 30033 11347 105.86 40.00. 107709 09104 2,79 6,10 t 201? 31102 0 44572 1164 1041 I2?.214 46239 260.1 31793 12020 105472 4000 109674 09910 2404 6.16 ' ?013 31102 0 44572 1234 1103 122054 46739 275.8 33656 12750 105.59 4000 111670 90764 2,90 6.22 2014 31102 0 44572 1340 1169 121094 46239 292,3 3562.9 1'3515 105.45 40.00 113703 91669 2.96 6,1.0 1 2015 31102 0 44572 1386 1240 1?1734 46239 30940 37711 14326 105,31 40.00 116020 92629 3x02 6,34 7016 3110?. 0 4457? 1470 1314 1?1075 46239 320.4 39928 15106 105,17 40,00 118388 93646 3108 6,41 ?017 31102 0 44572 L5g0' 1393 121415 46239 346,1 42268 11:097 105,03 k0100 12009.''+ 94724 3,1: 6,49 2010 31102 0 44577 1651 1477 1'11256 46239 369.0 44746 17063 104,90 40,00 1?3550 95067 3,23 6,51 2019 31102 0 44572 1750 1565 121090 46239 391,2 47368 10086 104.76 40.00 1?6360 97079 3,30 6,65 1 i 2020 31102 0 4457? 1656 1659 120(139 46439 414.6 50145 19172 104.6?. 40000 129336 96363 3,39 6,74 1 2021 31102 0 44572 1967 1759 120780 46239 439,5 53004 203?2 104.48 40.00 132406 99724 3,47 6.83 2021 3110? 0 44572 2005 1064 120622 46239 465.9 56195 21541 104,35 40400 11582I 101167 3,57 60 3 2023 31102 0 44572 2210 1976 120464 46239 493,8 59489 22034 104.21 40,00 139351 102696 3,66 7,03 I` 2024 31102 0 44572 2343 2095 t20306 46239 523.5 62976 24204 104.07 4010% 143089 104310 3.77 7415 2025 0 0 44572 2403 22?,0 12OL49 46239 554,9 66667 ?5656 103.94 40,00 115944 74934 3.06 5413 2026 0 0 44572 26'12 2354 119991 46239 508.? 70571, 21196 103.00 40.00 120134 76759 3.17 5„26 - t 2027,. 0 0 44571 2790 2495 119034 46?39 621.5 74711 ? 117 103.67 40.00 124570 706116 3.29 5,39 A ?028 0 0 44572 2958 2645 11g677 41,239 660.9 79090 3(,')57 103.53 40.00 129266 60733 3,42 5,53 20?.9 0 0 44572 3135 2003 119520 46239 700.5 83725 32390 103.39 40.00 1342)0 62903 3.56 5,68 !1 2030 0 0 0 3523 2972 119364 46?39 74?.5 081x32 34334 103126 40.00 94926 40630 2.52 2,78 ?031 0 0 0 3523 3150 1t920A 46739 787,1 93027 31,394 1'3.12 40.00 100501 43060 2467 205 V ?032 0 0 0 3734 3339 1.19051 46239 034,3 99327 311570 102,99 43.00 106401 4765;: 2.83 3,13 ?r 1033 0 0 0 3958 3539 110A95 46239 004,4 1'05140 401194 101.85 40,00 112647 48391 3400 3,31 ~ 2034 0 U 0 4196 3752 111740 46?29 OIV,4 111311 433',6 102.71 40,00 119260 51194 3.10 3451 + 2035 0 0 0 4448 3977 116584 4(239 99?.7 117035 45''x47 102,58 40.00 12)261 54312 307 302 1 2036 0 0 0 4714 4215 110429 46?39 10530 124742 40703 102.45 40.00 133673 57634 3957 3.95 It 2037 0 0 0 45`97 4468 118274 46'.39 111, 132053 51626 102,32 40.00 141520 6109.1 3,79 4.18 2030 0 0 0 5297 4737 118119 46239 It 8315 139793 5472.3 101110 4040D 149928 64756 402 4.44_ 1. ?039 0 0 0 5615 5021 117964 46739 12540 14'1987 50007 10205 40.00 158624 68644 4.26 4470 G 2040 0 0 0 5g52 5312 117809 46?39 1329,8 156660 61487 101.91 40.00 167935 72761 4,51 4.98 2041 0 0 0 6309 5641 117655 46?39 1409.6 165842 65176 101.78 40.00 177794 77228, 4679 5,28 13. 204? G 0 0 6690 5900 111501 46239 1494.1 175563 69087 101,65 40,00 18823? 81756 5607 5.60 a ' 2043 0 0 0 7009 6339 117347 46239 1183,0 105053 73237 101,51 4040() 199282 06651 5.30 5.94 ' k ?044 0 0 0 7514 6119 I171g8 46739 1670,8 1967'16 77626 101430 40.00 Z10980 91861 5670 4.29 (1 2045 0 0 0 7965 712?_ 117040 462.39 1779,5 2011277 62?84 101.25 40.00 723366 9117J 6.04 6.67 } 2046 0 0 0 0449 7550 116Ag6 4623'1 1811613 220405 07221 101612 40,00 236479 103'2.15 b141 7107 20x17 0 0 0 8950 8003 116133 46239 1999,5 233408 92154 100.90 40.00 250362 109408 6.79 7.49 1 ?OltU 0 0 0 (1487 0483 116500 46299 2119.5 247000 911002 100485 40.00 269059 115912 7,20 7,94 ?.049 0 0 0 10056 0992 1164?P 46139 2246.6 261'')70 103002 1n0.72 40,00 200620 122931 7.63 0,42 2050 0 0 0 10660 9531 116275 4623" 2381.4 ?76901 110115 100.59 40,00 297094 130307 8,09 8,93 1 20511 0 0 0 11299 10103 116123 46239 2524,3 293131 116721 100,45 40.00 314535 130125 0.58 9 46 IE S 205?. 0 0 0 11977 10710 115971 46239 2675,0 310312 1237?5 100,32 4j.00 333000 146413 9.09 10,03 w a f~3 COST MOO£L FOR LAKE- SLR BLF 1+11 t~ YEAR CAPITAL COSTS OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS YIELD TOTAL COST COST/K-GALNS p.£SF.RVR RESBRVP. TRANSMISS RES£RVR 1RANSOISS P Oti£ R l [MMFD1 (OFFER) USAGE RATE COST ' SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT SAFE PROJECT SAFF. PROJECT 1995 20033 0 0 335 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0,00 0.00 20368 20260 0400 0.00 1946 28033 0 0 355 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0400 0400 MR13 28388 0.00 0.00 l 1997 20033 0 0 376 0 0 0 000 0 0 000 0.00 W O 28409 0600 0.00 0600 0600 28432 28432 0,00 0,00` 1'198 26033 0 0 390 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 1999 ?1033 0 0 422 0 0 0 060 0 0 1,00 6,00 28456 20454 0.00 0407 9977 155,00 40400 96730 79550 1471 S.+4S ~ I 2000 20033 0 44572 477 548 17094? 46739 137,0 24522 6336 154,60 40900 90152 79966 1.74 5,4B W77 ~1117 179177 2001 211033 0 2002 28OJ3 0 44572 503 581 170707 46239 1450 25959 6716 154.59 40.OU 99651 80400 1471 5,51 l 2003 20033 0 44572 523 616 176473 46239 154.0 27481 7119 154.39 40.00 101237 00076 1400 5.114 2004 20033 0 44572 565 653 178239 46239 163.2 29091 7547 154,19 40.00 10291.7 81372 1*83 5457 5461 2005 28033 0 44572 999 692 178006 46239 17340 30797 7999 153,99 40,00 104695 61098 2006 29033 0 44577. 635 734 171773 46239 10344 32602 0479 1513.79 40.00 106578 82451) 1.70 5,65 ~l1 2007 26033 0 44572 674 778 177540 +4b 239 194.4 34512 0988 153.50 40.00 108571 83047 1,44 5.69 ~ 2000 26033 0 44572 114 024 177307 46239 206.1 36','35 9527 153430 40,00 110601 63673 1.96 5,73 ! 2009 28033 0 44572 757 074 177075 46239 21604 39477 10099 151.18 40400 112915 84337 2.02 5.78 0~ 20)0 28033 0 44972 802 926 176843 46239 23195 +0941) 10705 11-2,98 40.00 115279 85041 2406 5.82 p 11 ?.0033 0 44572 851 981; 176'.11 It 6P39 245,4 43343 11347 1!'7.470 40.00 117703 85787 2.11 5,88 '2 012 28033 0 44572 902 1011 176310 46239 26091 45134 12040 162,56 4040 120434 86578 2.14 503 2013 28033 0 44512 956 1103 176149 46239 275.8 485173 12750 152630 40.00 123239 87416 2.22 509 N f Z014 26033 0 4072 1013 11 (19 17591(f A 6 2412,1 51,420 13515 152,19 40.00 20 7 2.33 6611 28033 0 4457?, 1074 1240 175600 46239 309.8 54434 1432.6 151.98 40,00 129357 0925 1 2016 28033 0 44572 1138 1314 175456 46239 320,1 61002 16U97 15L,50 40.00 1362U9 91304 ?,,4b 6.25 2017 28033 0 4457?. 1407 1393 175228 46239 340. 2018 28033 0 44972 1179 1477 174990 46239 36940 64977 17063 151.39 40.00 139940 92426. 2.53 6,33 ~ 2019 28033 0 44572 1356 1565 174769 46239 39142 68362 18006 151.19 40.00 143091 93615 2461 6.41 5 2 FFk 2020 28035 0 44572 1437 1659 174540 46239 41to.6 72669 1917 7. 150,79 40.00 152701 96212 2077 6,59 lil 2021, 20033 0 44572 1524 1759 174311 46739 4 310 * 5 2022 20033 0 44572 1615 1064 174001 46239 465.9 81101 21541 150.59 40.00 157108 97629 2.86 6.69 20234 20033 0 44571 1712 1976 1.73055 46739 49349 0565'5 22034 L50640 40,00 162150 99129 2.95 6.79 90 (jl 2024,20033 0 44572 1815 2095 173b27 46239 523,5 90814 V5671 150,20 400*00 167404 194374 2.65 5109 2,025 0 0 44572 19?4 2?.20 173400 462,19 514.9 16 t 2026 0 0 44572 2039 2354 173123 46739 560.2 101853 21196 149,111 40,00 150920 76162 2.76 9.22 ~1 2027 0 0 44572 2161 2495 1729.6 46239 623,5 107023 28027 149.61 40,00 157053 76058 2.68 5,35 ' 7026 0 0 44572 2291 2645 172719 4b?39 660,9 114143 30557 141) '41 40.00 1634,52 80067 3.00 5448 2029 0 0 44572 75%29 2803 112493 46239 700,9 120033 32391 1491?2 40400 170639 02196 3,13 5,63 FIl 2030 0 0 0 2574 2972 172267 46239 74295 127915 34334 14902 40,00 1,33462 39081 2.45 2,73 ?031 0 0 0 ?729 3150 172041 46239 787,1 135412 36394 146,83 40.00 141292 42274 2,60 2.90 2(132 0 0 0 2093 3934 111816 46239 634.3 143349 30978 146,63 40400 149562 44810 2.76 3.07 ,I 2033 0 0 0 3066 3539 171591 46239 084.4 1517'lL 40092 148.44 40.00 158370 47499 2,92 3425 d 2034 0 0 0 3250 3'752 171366 46239 937,4 160645 43346 148424 4000 167646 50349 3610 3445 0 0 34le5 3977 173142 46239 993,7 170061 45947 148.05 40.00 177484 53170 3,28 3.66 t ?036 0 0 0 3652 4215 170917 46239 1053.3 100029 40704 147,06 40,00 187897 56572 3.40 3,07 ) 15 2W 0 0 0 3071 4468 170693 46239 1116.5 219 0017511 54,723 111407.6 4(loOO 198<)21 9996 lebo? 40,00 210592 63565 3491 4*35 0 4103 4737 170470 46239 1183. I I 2039 0 0 0 4350 5021 170247 46?39 115445 213575 50007 147.28 40,00 222947 67370 4.15 4,61 0 4611 5322 170024 46?39 132948 226093 61407 147408 40400 236027 71421 4.40 44419 7041 0 0 0 4007 5641 169801 46239 3409,6 239345 65177 146,89 40,00 245075 }0749 4.94 5.50 ~I 2040 0 f II 31 2042 - 0 0 0 5181 5980 16917C 46239 1494.1 253374 69087 146.70. 40,00 ?64.65'. 2043 0 0 0 5492 6339 169356 46239 158360 260224 73232 146,50 40400 200055 85064 5.24 5.83 1 2044 0 0 0 5621 6719 1691'14 46239 167698 283945 77676 14601 4000 ?96406 90168 5.55 6618 fl 2045 0 0 0 6170 7122 160913 46239 1779,5 300508 02264 14661? 40*00 1138111 95578 9489 6455 332297 101312 6,24 6.94 r E 2046 0 0 0 6541 '1550 16136(12 46239 lBn6.? 310209 111221 145.93 0,00 2047 0 0 0 6931 P003 160471 46239 1999.''1 336056 92404 145.7-- 40,00 351793 107391 6,61 7.36 2048 0 0 0 7349 0483 160250 46234 2119•'; 3°56600 9600? 145.55 40900 372433 113435 7401 7.00 f!! 2049 0 0 0 7790 099? 16001.9 467.39 2746,6 371500 103602 145.36 40,00 394213 120669 7.43 W6 I 0 0 0 82.57 953L 167009 46239 2301.4 39962(4 110115 145.17 40.00 417416 127905 7.80 6.'16 2050 2051 0 0 0 0753 10103 14,7509 46279 2524.3 423049 11672? 141.96 40400 441906 L35579 8.35 9429 , ' it w? 0 0 it 9270 1071067370 46?39 2677.9 ,447045 123725 144479 40.00 467633 143714. 8.85 94154 } I, t tl 1 COST MODEL FOR LAKE. COUPER , YEAR CAPtTAI COSTS IIPERATIt1G AND 11AINmIANCE COSTS POwr11 TOTAL COST COST/K-GALNS RESERVP RESERVR TRANSMIS RfSERVR TRAMSMISS USAGE RATE COST 5[1.10 1;MNF01 (OEfF.R1 SAFE PROJECT %Fr PROJECT ShFk PROJECT 5574 PR0574T 0.00 QOI.OOC1 r 0 0 013 0 0 4.00 0600 1990 490 0 0 83 0 0 0.0 0 0 0000 0100 500 580 0.00 0.00 1 1941 490 0 0 90 0 ) 0 0.04 0.00 590 508 0,00 0.00- 0 97 0 0 0 0.0 0 0400 0000 545 595 0.00 0.00 1992 490 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0.,0Q 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 604 604 0.00 0906 199 3 4A90 0 . t 199y 490 0 0 113 f / 1995 490 0, 11030 120 1186 99 56366 56440 102.4 5772 5779 20,15 20.15 17626 17636 2.40 ?,40 { 109h 490 0 11030 127 211 562117 56440 100,1 6110 6126 ?.0.15 20.15 17966 10002 2.45 2.45 1997 490 0 11038 135 2?4 56Z18 56440 ll5,l 6460 6494 20.15 20.1`5 10365 18390 2.55 2.56 if L990 490 0 11036 1,3 l Q 6847 6083 20.15. 20.15 1187951660 11896802 2.55 2.56 217 1561114 ',6~40 1998 490 0 110'x0 152 252 56071 56440 129.3 V49 7296 39.24 39,50 57 1`•37 1•_36 1 2000 490 418 11038 171 20059 Zolag 1 140 67 55997 56440 137.0 7671 7714 39,19 39,50 2001 490 410 11030 170 283 559?4 56440 145.3 6123 0196 39,14 34.50 20536 20610 1,.44 1.43 ' 2002 490 410 11038 101 300 558'51 56440 15460 0544 6600 39.09 39.50 21040 21130 1.47 1,4T 20+13 490 418 17018 192 130? 9101 971i 39,04 399~0 ?1573 21o6l 1.51 1 0 50 310 5 57 7 0 561140 37 `i5104 56440 1+±3.0 9637 9764 38.99 39.50 x2 130 22269 1-96 1 65A I ! 2005 4 49090 Alp 6 ]111030300 2 215 03 3 2005 736 22004 1.60 1.59 2006 490 418 11038 226 357 555b32 56440 IM4 10?02 JC35 16.1)1 39950 56440 194.4 10809 10971 38,00 39.50 23369 73540 1.65 1.63 2007 379 440 418 11038 242 1660 2000 490 418 1.1038 257 401 554116 '56440 206.1 11433 116?9 30.78 39,50 25749 24973 1,70 1.73 , 2009 490 418 11030 272 425 55413 56440 218.4 12103 12327 N f 7.010 440 458 11038 208 45I 5'5341 56440 231.E 12812 13057 34.7S 39.50 25501 25755 1.80 1.79 ' 2011 490 418 11036 306 478 55260 56440 245.4 13573 13851 36.68 39.50 26296 26503 1.86 1,84 418 11038 324 501 55190 56440 260,1 14350 14682 38.63 19.50 27138 ?.7462 1.92 1,90 2012 490 537 5'5123 56440 275.0 15200 15563 30.'5(1 39.50 28030 28392 1.99 7,97 y i } 2013 490 410 11030 343 292.3 16091 16497 38.53 39.50 20473 29374 2,06 2,04 I 2014 490 418 11038 364 5656644440 0 309.9 17034 17487 39.40 39.50 20973 30425 2.13. ? "1 r 50 31030 31534 2.21 2-14 2015 490 418 11038 306 609 9 5549507519 5 1 56440 320*~ 10033 16536 38oA3 39, 2016 490 418 11038 409 440 54815 56440 348,1 19090 19640 30.38 39.50 32150 32709 2.30 2,27 2011 490 418 11038 434 2010 490 410 11038 460 719 54763 56440 36949 20208 20027 38.33 39.'50 33336 33955 2.36 2.36 } ?019 490 416 11038 487 '762 54692 56440 39142 21393 2.7077 10#20 39 50 35920 356715 2057 12.)4 1 ?020 490 410 11038 517 000 54620 56440 414,6 22647 23401 30, 23 37327 38158 2.68 2.65 2021 440 410 11030 546 856 54540 56440 435.5 23974 2,001t 30,18 39.50 +0394 41390 ,2.91 2.87 1 y- #022 490 418 11038 581 908 54477 56440 475.9 25379 26291t 39.11 39.50 30017 39730 2.79 2.76 2023 490 418 11036 615 962 54405 56440 49348 26867 27870 38908 39950 420 63 43165 3.03 2,94 5 20 38 ?024 490 418 1103n 642 14131 54263 51+440 554.9 30109 31'316 37,98 39,50 32792 34000 2.37 2436 ! ! 205 490 418 0 733 1146 5419?. 56440 58842 31873 33195 37,93 ]9.'50 34663 35985 2.50 2,.50 2026 490 418 777 1215 54171 56440 62345 3 142 35187 3'7,88 34.50 36644 38090 2.65 2.64 50 18742 40324 ?..81 2680 2027 45U 418 0 20211 490 418 0 624 1286 54050 56440 760.9 35719 31298 37,83 39, 09 6 7 412685 2.97 206 20?9 490 418 0 673 1365 53979 56410 700.5 37013 35539 37478 39.50 433 L3 45192 3.15 3.13 7030 5,40 418 0 926 1447 53909 564t0 742.5 40529 41900 3'1.73 39,50 45801 47849 3.33 343? 2031 490 418 0 981 1534 53830 $6440 707.1 42375 44423 37,68 39,50 1040 1626 53757 56440 834.3 44854 47088 37. 51n?.63 14.50 45 50665 3.53 3.51 2032 490 '418 p 110? 1724 53697 56440 084,4 47480 45914 17.50 39,56 516 i1 3.73 1.72 t 2033 490 418 91076 560 15 149!1 1404 ' 34 440 410 0 1164 181.7 i3617 56440 937.4 50272 52909 37.53 39,50 y 20 53218 56003 37.48 39.50 57305 60169 4,19 4e 11 1 2935 490 418 0 1239 1937 53557 50440 993.7 Z053 `)3406 '56440 1053.3 57337 5 ri 5-8 37. 4 3 19050 60614 61725 4e44 4,42 k9o fl 20]6 494 449108 0 1392 2176 11416 56440 1116,5 59639 63015 37,38 39.50 64118 67494 400 4,68 f, 2038 490 418 0 1476 2307 53346 56440 118345 63135 66796 3704 39,50 67826 71489 4.98 4.96 2037 ' 17, 29 39*50 11796 75724 5PZ7 ~*25 2034 440 418 0 1564 ?445 51?76 564140 129~65 66036 7080A E 2592 51201+ 50440 1329.0 70753 1405Z 37424 39050 7547,3 797N.. 5155 5.53 r 2041 0 8 0 S75A 27411 ,3137 56440 1409.6 74400 74755 37.15 39.150 79025 84480 5.80 5.06 } 20040 0 418 0 ib r 50 04405 84524 7.21 6.21 2042 0 418 0 1063 2913 53067 56440 1494,1 79240 84329 37.14 39. 0 418 0 1975 3001 52998 56440 1583.8 83937 89388 17409 39950 04419 94870 6060 _¢.x58 50 94643 100538 7.00 6,911 f5. € 2 20111 044 0 418 n 2219 3419 52058 56440 17'19,5 94065 100437 36,99 39,50 100173 1U654y 7,4? 7.39 20h5 0 410 0 ?,352 31;17 52790 `.6440 180693 99578 1OG463 36.95 39,50 106028 112912 7.66 7483 2047 0 418 0 2443 5090 '52720 56440 1+55.5 10541.5 117.851 36,90 39850 1W26 11966? 8,33 9+30 2046 0 410 . ~ EQUALS ?S5I1HED INFLATION RATf.I ''1^ COMPARISON OF RVIlIR STRATEGIES 011 DISCOUNTED OASIS (DISCOUNT RATF C(IOPER TOT Al YEAR Tt11 AL RESERVOIR STRATEGY AT SAFE YIELD SLR 8LF Itoli SLPIIR DLF 1 Yk'AR TOT hI YEAR TOTAL YEAR COSY /GAL IGAL TOAL YEAR TOTAL YEAR YICORPS AUOREYJLOCAI (GAL COST COST /GAL JGAL COST AUBRE T IGAL YEAR TOTAL YEAR TOTAL YEAR TCOST /GAL TOJTGAAL L COST CTOS 0,00 0000 .27 •27 0,00 0, t 00 t ) COST IGAL (GAL COST 0.00 4.00 ,52 0.00 . ii CErST 60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0400 0900 0.00 25 00 .75 0.00 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0400 0 0 00 0 00 O.OU .22 .97 04.00 0,00 1990 6.25 6.25 0.00 0.00 19.80 10.15 0.00 0400 00 0.00 0000 010 .00 0.000400 5 6.253 5 1991 5.85 12.10 0.01% 0.00 18.35 55.15 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0600 0.00 1.17 ,00 440 17.,58 0,00 0.00 17400 70.90 0100 0.00 0.00 0,00 0000 0,00 0,00 0.00 ,21 6,73 .76 091 1x92 5.47 22.70 0.00 0.00 15675 0+00 a.UO 9.11 0400 0.00 12.07 .73 .82 9111 E, 1993 5.13 £5,49 0,00 0600 0,00 17.71 0.00 0,00 5 5. 134 X70 1994 ti681 27.51 0.00 0.00 14.59 99.26 .60 4.35 10.13 10,13 0'00 O0OO 8460 DD 4.945 22,?l 'T' 13.77 2.46 9.56 19.69 0. 25,8;1 0600 0. 17 t 32609 .35 2.43 112 1975 .75 1. o12U.00 0.00 8.12 616 '.67 065 71 4,.8 0 94 4.37 36,46 .33 1.38 13.00 .26 .5 1-0?, 9 03 (0.00 0.00 7.67 33.50 tl,00 0.00 260 1996 ,62 17 40.63 132 1.02 12.27 1?.4.54 .54 4 1.49 8153 37:29 t 0,00 0100 4.71 31.64 33 1497 4, 44 .60 430 184 11.59 L3h.13 651, 45.30 0.00 0600 7424 63.96 .41 1.13 ,55 r .32 1998 3.98 (17.58 .57 1.72 23,2?. .76 4.54 300 . 48.40 629 .73 10.94 147.07 .4II 1.79 8.105 r ~ 86.IB .39 40.57 .31 51 ` Igqq 3680 80.02. .54 1.13 22.7.2 ,63 4.39 93 21-29 24UD 6,05 54.45 623 459 19.75 167.19 .43 1.05 21.20 10 7. 47 .30 r 4.?.4 44.81 ,2390' .45 .'i0 .82 7.4,40 127.67 .36 .97 2001 5679 60.20 .2? 651 r ,41 .97 20,2'7 109.09 .50 r .5Z 4.10 40.91 .9.35 128,44 147,4 .35 2.80 •28 '43 j 2042 5„47 65.63 ,21 4h 9.21 176.39 55b . 73 39 3.97 ,27 .42 70.88 .20 .4? 8.69 105.04 39 ,,9II1 5 11A.48 146.93 .47 T5 19,57 •47 2093 5.21 ,34 9.21 193.?-5 436 •40; 2004 5.46 75.84 .19 .!!1 17.66 164.59 ,45 ,66 18 03 104.7.5 •32 'r 9.73 60.46 .26 -10 2005 4,72 90.51 .1R .37 7.75 ?.01,01 134 7 16.89 181.48 +43 , 63 17.33 ?01.56 .31 ,5 64.06 .26 ,39 41 1.62 2006 4.50 85.07 .18 .35 7.32 208.33 •33 7 ,73 1b, 16 197.64 .42 7.10.25 .30 '42 3.52 67.60 .25 .38 h ,50 16.04 234.29 6Z9 4 4.24 89.36 .17 633 6.91 219.'24 631 3.42 71.OZ .24 .37 20,07 6.53 221.77 '29 ,67 14.02 2?.7.93 .30 '61 16,6 ,40 2t10B 4 in 93.46 .16 432 .57 15.45 ?49.74 ,20 ,39 3,3? t4.34 •24 '3b 2009 97.96 .15 .30 6.17 273.77 e26 F5 14.7.1 242,14 .37 3.73 101.10 615 .?9 • ,b2 13.63 255.77 635 .55 14.89 264.64 .27 10 3.24 77.58 .22 .35 2010 r .53 14.37 270,91 676 3,15 80.73 •22 434 20t1 36.17 104.6(1 t4 .28 5.51 239.20 .25 63.81 .22 .34 7.7 ?.0 ?.44.48 423 .b0 13.08 268.89 '34 306.26 .24 636 3.00 . 5 F1 12.57 261.41 .33 .52 13.97 306.86 .Z4 49 00 86•'11 •?l .33 201?. 3.41 108.08 •13 .?6 4,9? 249.39 .2? ,49 12.95 31.4.21 ,23 .32 1 °3(' , 89,74 .71 2013 3.26 111.34 .13 .26 4.64 254.04 .2I .56 12,00 293.49 .31 .50 13.40 2014 3.12 .114+46 61.2 4.34 2%8.43 420 55 11.67. 305411 030 ,31 79 40 17..54 331.75 '23 ,34 ?6 c07 92.61 .20 .32 * 35 2P15 2.gQ 117.46 ..1? •25 '53 11.19 447 1- 343.89 622 2.00 95.41 .2D ,24 4.15 ?.62.50 - 28 ,52 10.76 327,07 .28 .33 g8 .15 ,20 031 ?016 2.87 120,32 .11 ,?3 3,9?. 266.10 410 67.66 .21 ,33 2.74 679 123608 411 .23 3,71 270.21 .17 .50 10.39 337,46 ,27 .45 1111.77 355.66 •?1 ,12 2,69 100.84 .19 •30 49 10.02 .49 .26 ,45 .41 3 .20 43?. 2..64 103.48 19. 2012017 8 2 2.64 1?5.72 ;11 09 378.15 2D .30 2C14 273-71 r 60 157.17 .2`i .44 1,77 318692 431 .59 106.06 419 ' 629 2.54 129..3 . 1 0 .22 3.14 273,8" •C1 'r~ ),95 366.52 .25 .43 100. 2020 2.44 13u.ba ,•!0 '22 ,14 273.99 , .O1 129 O1 .4 4 4:0 5 375.57 .24 ,42 16.47 399.39 .1q 431 2.04 108460 x18 .7.9 19 40q*58 2021 2.35 133,04 609 •21 14 274,12 1,2 76 384.32 .23 .41 19.92 419.54 •18 630 2.49 111.09 .I8 20??. 2.26 135.30 .09 .21 8 .14 2'I4.40 .01 .~1 8.48 31) Z400 •22 ,40 8,10 427661 .15 .30 1.83 112.93 •13 .28 7.0 2023 2.19 137.48 .D9 2D 414 274.?(' •Ol 0 6.48 399.'/4 •17 .34 7.96 435.56 .1'3 .24 1.83 114.76 .13 ,27 2024 2.16 139658 600 ,14 274.94 '01 6.'14 405.63 .17 443.38 .14 .28 1.82 116.56 ,13 .27 i) 2025 2.03 141.60 •09 20 20 .38 7.02 01 417.03 .16 .37 7.68 4991606 414 •28 1.87 118.40 ,13 .26 04 P. I ook 2026 1.96 143.56 •48 :19 .14 274,11 ,O1 3387 6 : ,28 1.01 120.21 •13 •2b 20ti 1.89 145.45 -08 ,14 274.05 _.nl ,136 6.07 417.89 •16 3T 7.56 450.62 •14 ,27 1,81 122`.02 .13 625 10 " 28 1.8a 147028 •07 '18 275.09 ,01 .3'5 5.95 42 3.04 .16 .2b I.B1 123.03 .13 'Jit 20 OIR .94 3.97 427.81 .11 ~3h 5.51 469.7'1 '10 ,261.80 125463 .13 .25 2029 1.77 149.05 •07 .18 .14 ?75.23 .01 3.96 431,77 .11 475.33 610 I Y 2030 1.72 150077 ,07 ,l4 275.37 801 .33 .34 5.56 26 1.00 127643 .13 . 25 2031 1.67 152.43 •07 .17 r r .33 3,46 435.73 •11 34 5,56 480.84 410 ,25 1474 129.22 613 .25 .1.4 279690 ,O1 .24 2032 1.62 154.05 •07 ,S7 14 275664 ,01 .32 3695 439668 .11 X33 9, 55 486144 910 825 ,1.74 131.01 •'i 3' 1.57 17 . 3.95 „417.63 .11 .32 5.54 491.48 410 624 447657 .11 r .24 Y.79 132,80 •13 l 2033 155.62 606 ,i7 .14 215.78_..401 31 203.4 1 .53 157.19 .06 .14 275.92 601 ,30 3'q4 451.51 . •11 632 56.14 497.92 .10 .24 1.78 134.58 .13 .?3 64 Ob •16 .30 3. 4 .31 5,53 503,04 .10 4 1.78 136.16 1t3 2035 1.44 118, , } 2016 1',5 1604,08 .06 ,1(0 .114 4 227766..105 4 .001 01 .T.9 3.93 455.4f + •11 .31 5$2 `.08.57 610 .2 .49 •06 1111 . ? 11 3.93 4x9.37 .11 .2S 1.77 131.13 .13 .?1 2037 1.41 161 sib ,l4 216,33 ,01 .30 .5,511 5144ao 614 .2 .?P 3,92 467.29 .11 3 1,76 139.89 .13, .4 23 23 v 2038 1 ,38 167,,87 •06 , 3,97 467 .?1 611 430 511)1 519,94 x10 .13 2039 1114 164.2) . 05 .15 .1q 276,4 -01 ? .7 .76 14144u ,11 .24 5.50 .12`1.09 .10 623 1 .23 r .15 4 276.61 1 4 530.50 410 .?.2 1.75 143. 8 ,14 276.74 .01 .27 1.91 4'/1.13 •11 622 1.75 145416 .13 .22 f~) 040 1.04 165.29 6 *04 0 4 15 ,?b 3.91 475,0) •11 X79 5644 516.07 •10 .13 12? 2 65 2041 1.03 166.28 r 115 , 1 4 276.09 .01 2, 1.75 14 -91 7 13 ?042 1.01 167.29 .14 .14 277602 401 .26 3~q0 447 87.04 .11 .29 5•x,7 947.U2 410 62? Iti8.65 Z 1606 1aH.2q .04 .14 4 r 46r>+73 1 r lo ,21 1474 150,40 413 ~Zt` 2043 14 277.16 ,01 25 3 t_ .28 5. Z01114 .99 15 9.78 .04 4 r 3.89 ? ,47 „1i 52.4`7. .l0 h 2014 .14 '177.29 •01 ,121 3..89 490.62_ '1474 152.14 .13 ,98 170.26 .44 .1 y 5,46 557.95 .10 2045 4-,277._.x01 3. n9 494.61 .i! ..7 ' 7046 97 171.7.'x..994.. .1 .4 - t14 27?.543 7 101 12. t 101,7 .96 112.19 ,04 ,14 I t l k . 4 i INC. MANAGEMENT CONSUIXANTS Dallas Houston ~ Austin t f h ' E January 31, 1980 f Chris Hartung City Manager , City of Denton i 215 E, McKinney 1 Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mr. Hartung: s Enclaseci are two copies of. the Aubrey Reservoir Finan- cial Feasibility Study Final Report. These reports ,f are. different from the first twenty we sent you in i that changes have been made on the following pages: 81 1`1, 14, 150 16, 17, 18, and 19. Ile have also added an Appendix c to the report. s ' Should you have any questions, please let: us know. Sincerely, Chris Williams Secretary/( ii _y Thompson j Enclosures I' f ~ i i 121JOO P'"k CoAtral, Su1t0 1808 Dallas, TO"8 76261 (214) 2,33.55A1 F X A!-; PARKS ANI:) W11..111 .I1 1 1 I I2 AI 1 IM 1'1\1 i 1J~ i' C0MXMI SS ION FRS I j11 {l<'.~, COMI ;So 11) N LI;S 11C11AY 11, SASS JOCK 1111 IDN m mirmun, tort Worth LubhOCh' 'E JAMBS R.PAXTON EnWIN L,COX,.M. .IJ viva"chairman, Palastmo Ddhis i UI IA II L1,S'). 111 AV IS PEARCE JOHNSON fX1 CIII IV1 IIIIiI cWI I W, n.Osaufw in. Au.stio Santa Plana 1200 Smith School Rood i I Austin, Trx;s 761,14 i December 3, 1979 i I Ms. Camille Cates s Assistant to the City Manager Offiec!, of the City Manager. City 1101 Dallas, Texas 75201 s J Deal' Ms. f:atee f Thank you for your letter of November 16, 1979, regarding the Aubrey Reservoir Project, As we discussed, the Department Is interested in this project and ].oaks forward to the findings and resolutions of y . your studies to be completed in December, In the meantime, I would be interested iu seeing a time frame of your plannIng schedule and updated cost, estimates for, the Aubrey Project, r As prom"sed in our meeting of November .13, 1979, please find attached } the Department's recommendations regarding Aubrey Lake Releases, It } Is noted that the recommendations regarding releases provided 11rre fire based on the project as ori.l;imrlly planned and Should the scope of the project change, the recommendations may need to be adjusted. In reference to your inquiries about coAtacts with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service please be advised that Jerome L. Johnson In Vort Worth , should be of nasist,rnce regarding the Aubrey project. Jerome L. Johnson Field Supervisor j USINS 1 - i 9A33 I }!rItz i anham Bldg. j 819 Taylor Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 I1 Phontl: AOU/334-7961 t I j ~i I. , R - - - - - ti a.~rirYtt . t l0 i i i Ms. Camille Cates Page Two ' December a, :19%9 € The Department: appreciaLee the opportunity to coordinate with you on this project and would be happy to discus:; It In greater detail.f3hould you de- sire. Please keep us advIged as the project progresses. 91 f Since 1 ~ CHARLES D. TRAVIS Executive Director r. CDT:JTR:plf Attachment s :i cc. Mr. Chris Ilartung i Mr, Thomas L. Taylor V.1b, Mr. Sam Gar-retl. i i l i i , F } j f j y i f, i i EXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DFJ'AR,rMl'NT RECOMMENDATIONS F FOR AUBRL',Y LAYS RBLMSI?S, OCYOiililt, 1976 ` Y ' Y l Some :ontroversy apparently sLil.l. exist:,, in regard to the firm yield of Aubrey Lake, It Is our understanding that this controversy stems from prior water rights for Lewisville Lake, which are In exceso of i.ts firm ~ . yield, and over systems management with Aubrey Lake., As the construction agency, the Corps of F.nginr.ers ccal.c.ul.al:ed Lhe firmyte.l.d of Aubrey. Lake ? to be 152 cubic feet/pecond (98,088,1.84 gallons /clay) under 1985 conditi,7ns and 139 cubic feet/second (89,838,063 gallons/day) under 2085 conditions, 'These are the firm yield figures in Lhe nuthorizatian document submlr;ted to Congress by the Corps of Engineers and found acceptable to the City of l Denton and the Texas Water RighLs Commission. "lie. recommendation by this { Depfartmerit for a 1.5 cubic feet/second con tIALIOUS base flow as well cas for a variable seasonal flow regime of l.5 cubic feet/second from December 1 - February 14, 140 cubic feet/second from February 15 - May 31, and 25 cubic } feet/second from June .1 - November 30 would require considerably less water than the firm yield of Aubrey Lake. A continuous flow of 140 cubic feet/ j second, recotmneuded by this Depnrtanent as desirable, would be only 1 cubic fooL'/second higher than the farm yield undo..r projected 2085 conditions but i could probably be provided in most years up until that time. The expected occurrence of spills from Aubrey Dam and the period of highest water use i and Denton coincide n-rlth the per.lod when higher continuous flows by Dallas are desirable for fish spawatiaag and recreation. t I Y 1 ill Y c t e E i I iP I f r i „ C{r i r i lltr f i I yaw f ~ ' l1PYJ. I}1J i f DEC 06 1979 ~ t CITY OF DENTON ; MANAGER'S OFFICE w _ 1 CITY OF DALLAS E I: `E I ti skt?. r±wre December 3, 1979 I li Dan S. Petty President, Chamber of Commerce 1507 Pacific Avenue Dallas, Texas 75201 Dear Dan: Congratulations on your peal job! If a meeting with Congressman Roberts or his staff is scheduled, vie would be pleased to attend and bring ! everyone up to date on our analysis of Aubrey. We r y hope to have the consultant's report within a month and a recommendation soon after the first of the year. 4A, ashes s ? e Cates the Cit Manager nt to y o ~ sV s bcc: Tom Tayl.r i> f If 01rp pF TNt CITY MANAG£N CITY HALL DALLAS, IEKAS76201 TELEPHONE 2141610.3301 i I I a ; i c ~ y ! c R (i 1 A j I i I r DEC 06 1979 CITY`. QF pENZ'ON, MANAGR'S OFFICE r Dallas Chamber of Commercu November 2, 1979 Mr. George Schrader City Manager ` City of Dallas City Ball, 4E South Dallas, Texas 75291 Res Proposal for Financial Feasibility Study for Aubrey Reservoir Dear George: ' i ' The Water "Subcommittee of the Committee on Natural Resources, Energy and Environment of the Chwober has become aware of the study to be undertaken by the cities of Dallas and Denton to examine the financial feasibility for Aubrey Reservoir. The Chamber wishes to commend Dallas and Denton for this positive step in insuring an adequate long-term, dependable water supply for this metropolitan region. The Chamber hopes that Dallas will move expeditiously to ascertain whether the Aubrey Reservoir has a role to play In supplying what the Chamber perceives to be long-term j Inadequacies of water supplies for this area,, and if the Reservoir appears to be at all financially feasible, that Dallas assume Its traditional role of leadership by making.ths I Aubrey Reservoir matter of first priority. I ; no Chamber also hopes that Dallas will do what it can to encourage and support the development of other feasible water resources including the Cooper Reservoir currently stymied by litigation. i Aubrey and Cooper appear to represent the best hopes for alleviating water shortages , for the metropolitan region, such shortages sure to have an adverse impact upon the City of Dallas ss well as its surrounding communities. Please feel free to call upon the Chamber for any efforts you think the Chamber could give to causing these important peojects, if financially feasible, to become reality. We would also appreciate an opportunity to be appraised of progress reports and the final results of the study. Very truly yours, DALLA1,1 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE J ' By . V earl ale, Jr. For: 4Vatitr Subcommittee of the Comml&e on i Natural Resources EnE ` , rgy and Environment Ac: City Council 1507 Pacific Avenue / Dallas, Texas 75201 / (214) 651-1020 i ' i i I I i. L M F , XC CC ~f 4r Dallas Chamber of Commerce ;(iV November 19, 1979 L> Ur.;r~~~ i The Honorable Ray Roberts House Of Representatives 2184 Rayburn House office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 I Dear Mr. Roberts: a f The Water Subcommittee of the Natural Resources, Energy and Environment Committee of the Dallas Chamber (V Commerce has for sometime been concerned about the long-term water needs of the Dallas metropolitan area. The subcommittee members have communicated with city officials and eneoul-4t,od them to move expeditiously in resolving the current inadequacies with regard to fuh'l,'e water supplies for this region. A copy of the letter sent to Mr. George Schrader, Dal]xs City Manager, has been enclosed for your information. i E At your convenience, members of the Water'Subcommittee would like to visit with you to discuss the Aubrey Reservoir project, A discussion of this subject could be arranged when your schedule includes other business in Dallas. While involving various concerned individuals, this meeting could foster more interest and lead to the expedient solution of the existing situation, Your comments and suggestions in resolving the long-term water outlook for this region would be greatly appreciat3d. We will plan a meeting of this nature if you or a staff member would please contact the Governmental Affairs Department of the Dallas Chamber of Commerce so they might coordinate your visit with the Water Subcommittee meeting. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. As always we are certain you will continue making important contributions to the resolution of the future water needs In this area. Sincerely, Dan S. Petty President Encl. 1507 Pacille Avenue / Dallas, Texas 75201 / (214) 661-1020 1 + Cams water utm City Hall • Dallas, Texas 76277 (214)670-3011 December 20, 1979 i Mr, Charles D. Travis Executive Director Texas Parks and Wildlife'Department 42,00 Smith School Road Austin, TX 78744 Dear Mr, Travis Your letter of December 3 to Camille Cates expressing continued interest in the Aubrey Project is appreciated. We look forward to working with you on this project and provide the following information in response to your letter. The Financial and Economic Feasibility Study being conducted by consultants is expected to be completed by mid-January. In the meantime, we are continuing our discussions with the Corps of Engineers to update cost, to refine project options, and to discuss possible contract terms. The Corps of Engineers current estimated cost for the Aubrey Project is $2269000,000. Of this amount the local share is estimated at $1595000,0001 including an estimated $16,500,000 for local participation in recreation j facilities. These amounts are predicated on the 1973 Aubrey Lake Design Memorandum. In reviewing contract terms, we were reminded that one of the first activities that must take place under a Corps of Engineers contract is the preparation of a "Plan of Recreation Development and Management". For the Aubrey Project, I expect the local sponsors will manage the preparation of that master plan, We look forward to working closely with you to define more precisely the scope and character of recreational development appropriate to this regional facility. Also, we solicit your interest in managing the surface area of Lake Aubrey. The water surface comprises approximately 30,000 acres. It would appear that the i water surface could best be controlled and supervised by your agency in r conjunction with operation of the proposed state park. i I t 'I I l A city utility providing Gallas with water purification and distribution, waste water collection and treatment f is 'r Mr. Charles D. Travis December 20, 1979 Page 2 Thank you for a copy of the recommendations regarding lake releases. As You Know, the Aubrey Project'contemplatr,s the use of the stream bed f6r conveying the water downstream, Accordingly, we will be glad to discuss with you the opportunities for coordinated releases consistent with water supply needs. Please let me know if we can provide further information pending the completion of the feasibility study, or if it would be timely to initiate our discussions regarding recreation development. Also, at your earliest convenience, Y would appreciate your confirming the Departments intention to proceed with a major state park in conjunction with Aubrey, if the local sponsors proceed with the project.' i Sincerely, t , 4 Thomas E. Taylor Assistant Director 1. } mb w Ci t' Manager City of Denton Camille Cates Assistant to the City Manager City of Dallas i { Jack Robinson, Director Park and Recreation Department P City of Dallas Art-Denys Corps of Engineer Pt. Worth District f 1 i M r 3 y i L j 1 1 it I 1 Y i I I SAC C 2 7'979 MANAGER'S Of ~N, t l TEXAS 17 PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONERS s' PERRY A. BASS f' JOE K. FULTON Chairman, For! Worth Lubbock JAMES R. PAXTON • EDWIN L. COX, JR. Vice-Chairman, Palestine Dallas CHARLES D, TRAVIS PEARCE JOHNSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR W. B, OSBORN, JR, Austin I 4200 SmINh School Road Santa Elena 1 Austin, Taxas 78744 - l December 3, 1979 y Ms. Camille Cates Assistant to the City Manager Office of the City Manager City Hall Dallas, Texas 75201 Dear Ms. Cates: Thank you for your letter of November 16, 1979, regarding the Aubrey Reservoir Project. As we discussed, the Department is interested in this project and looks foxwa'rd t6 the findings and resolutions of your studies to be completed in December, In the meantime, 1 would be interested-1n seeing a time frame of your planning schedule ard updated cost,.estimates for the Aubrey Project. As promised in our meeting of November 13, 1979, please find attached the Department's recotmendati.ons regarding Aubrey Lake Releases, It is noted that the recommendations regarding releases provided here are based on the project as originally planned and should the scope of the project change, the recommendations may need to be adjusted. In reference to your inquiries about contacts with the U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service please be advised that Jerome L. Johnson in Fort Worth should be of assistance regarding the Aubrey project. Jerome L. Johnson Field Supervisor us Mr$ i 9A3.3 E Fritz Lanham Bldg. t 819 Taylor Street Fort: Worth, Texas 76;'.02 ' Phone: AC817/334-2961 I , 4 7. 4 Ms. Camille Cates Page Two December 3, 1979 The Department appreciates the opportunity to coordinate with you on this } project and would be happy to discuss it in greater detail should you de- sire. Please keep us advised as the project progresses. Since ly r CHARL'O D. TRAVIS Executive Director CDT:JTR:plf Attachment c; 14r. Chris Hartung F Mr. Thomas E. Taylor P.B. Mr, Sam Garrett i j r R i i P Il f P . i LAW BOOTH, UOYi?~r AND SIMMONS 4 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 302 SAN JACINTO BUILDING I 9TH & SAN JACINTO ! FRANK H. 13001'H AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 f ROLIERT H. LLOYD 512-478.9506 LUTC1iER B, SIMMONS PAUL G, GOSSELINK SKIP NEWSOM January 7.Q,, 1980 1 Mr.. Chris Hartung City Manager X16 E, McKinney street. Denton, Texas 76201 I)eci? I Chris: 1 I will have my co.mme,,]ts to You Engineers Aubrey contracts in a few dayserninc the Corps of In the Meant .ime,, I submit the followin for consideration in ne oti&tin g points to Ya g with Dallas. i~ 1• Any contract., should settle thcl question between Dallas and Denton as to the Lewisville and Aubrey Projects. l.)enEor~ maY take from 2. Any contract should conta:i.n r c'ulation of yield in ~ Provision for r~'c'Fr..t~ f return. flows offset losthe s offuture rccr,>ynizes that sewcsrage 3 of inflow, perhaps an arbitration g OzAPac~lity or diminution provs r icion could be usr,d. 4 3• Any contract should provide for Dallas Operate the reser irs in a manner so as to res to peat ~+ontan' B right-9 • However, since the Department of ;Varie Re s water will have watarmaster jurisdiction in the norrr future, this Provision could be omitted if necessary. soura'as . imPortin Any contract should recognize the pos,si};ili,/s f"Or + g water into Aubrey and/or Lewisville Reservoirs. You Mould, perhaps, not approach Dallas w,il ' Of Dallas owning all the water rights in Aubre ::h t+le idea Dallas brings the subject up. Y and see if 1 Very truly yours, ank R. Booth VRB,/j n ' u cc: Ur. Bob Coach Mrs Bob Nelson r , . .1 1 Y L LAW Of ME5 BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 302 SAN JACINTO BUILDING 0TH & SAN JACINTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 FRANK R.BOOTH 512-478.9506 a ROBERT H. LLOYD LUTCHER B. SIMMONS PAUL G, GOSSELINK SKIP NEWSOM PATRICK W. LINDNER January 28, 1980 i Mr. Chris Hartung City Manager * 216 F. McKinney street Denton, Texas 76201 RE: Contracts - City of Denton, United States C Dear Chris: I, We have reviewed the contracts between the City of I Denton and the Corps of :engineers on behalf of the United States of America relating to the Aubrey Project. Similarly, a review has been made by Mr, Robert Gooch, Freese & Nichols, Consulting Engineers. Bob states that hn has reviewed the water supply contract and that it is aceep'Mb1e. Ile states that he has briefly reviewed the recreation development contract and thinks it is acceptable, My reaction is that both contracts are shorter and " bettor written than the previous call you: a?,tention to two points. First,ltthencontr.act for water storage space does not include a separate schedule for the amortization of future use costs which are described in Exhibit A. This is not essential. and in many respects could be misleading if included because of the number of variables that can enter into the acff. lixl payments to be made t future costa. It is imporLant,however, to realize tthat fthe l` # Exhibit B is an estimated schedule for annual payments for present demand and that such schedule does not represent the ultimate annual expenditure which the City of Denton will be required to amortize at such time as future demand occurs y or., in any event, no later than 10 years from hate of execution. Second, with respect to the recreation contract, 16 USCA 460 t(b) provides for repayment of the separable costs of the ect allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife I Mr. Chris Hartung January 28, 1980 Page Two i enhancement nut of and limited to entrance and user fees or charges collected at the project by nonfederal interests, There is no specific reference to this method of payment by the City of Menton. It may be well to su reference in the contract to this limitationsonstheisource of funds to repay the cost, in order to avoid'any question ( in the future as to whether the City must atiake these payments i out of other revenues of the City. Kindest personal regards. very truly your II Frank R. Booth FRB/jn 'i i A II i E v 1 I J ft ' E J{ I j i i r s r -n CHEVROLET k CARTER CHEVROLET CO. 700 N. McDonald MCKtNNsY, TEXAS 75088 542-0101 Dallas Line 234.2454 v , r A 9 f January 30, 1980 i E*.' The Honorable Mayor Bill Nash 215 H. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mayor Nashi C Although I am not personally affected by the proposal to create a water supply from Lake Aubrey for Denton and Dallas, I have been ' closely following the project's progress. Congressman Ray Roberts I has been working long and hard to make the lake a reaitty, And after many years of serving us in Congress, lie is retiring when his term is completed, r During his terms in Congress, he has accomplished a great deal for the people of north 'T'exas. As one businessman in McKinney, I feel r r Just1fied in suggesting to the cities of Denton and Dallas that the lake be named for a man who has contributed to the continued progress ` of this entire area. Therefore, I propose that you consider using your influence to have the lake named for Congressman Ray Roberts, s s I Sincerely, ) Charles B. Carter I c I I i ' I SEW IfI f i I January 30, 1980 MEMOP,ANDUM r TO: Chris Hartung r FROM: M. A, Hancock , SUBJECT: Renami:,g Take Aubrey My Hill contacts have advised that any legislation to rename hake Aabrey should wrilt until after passage of the water projects bill in the House, You will note from the Eittached that a tough battle is promised although It seems likely that Chairman Roberts will prevail, Attach: 1/30/80 Wash Star cc: N. Amos r` i s i 1 i 3. r+~ F E B 04 1980 I CITY OF DENTON MANAGER'S OFFICE E - A - y farm U,S. tnteruxou~~ illtary ing tarn u ».y the ° -wln~!Soviel mdf the Seas . ward curve of I1.S strategic nucium ty,J,cdt4y,',nerf a ee told Secretary of Drlense , r afr h 1 t } ~iy , '1 Y~ 'J , 1110rs;•WdR 16 arlnOUrll cr,. - Br&wn and other dr;fense ; "'o ` t°"u ldiwhen'the glx•who escaped Sunda} yesterday that will try to r n 'Std ,'a wtiulriretlurntdtheUpitedStates. . e the administration by }~uhes .Prep~ g In Washington, State Departmen ng rpoe planes, missiles and D~~~ spokesman F{otiding Carter yester ps into the aleady.near• clay expressed ' y 7Jo ~O of Metro "f!r t peaceti me defense package. Pa/ J "deep uppr ' , the the Canadian government" for it ng the hearing ye§terday ,x help He, said that no other America of several controversial mill- t, , ' officials were believed. hiding i ejects previously shelved by ran on suddenly $90-Mi~llon lNass-71ranSll } _ a+ ? The story become public in yest( rter adrninistrat ii Moritre' alized. There were repeated t } ,•p}`E A day's edition of the itions that the traditionally, ~ ackagrr !5 Announced r „French-language • newspaper, 1 .sh committee will push for By Michasltslkoff €r a PresseAts Washington correspok )pment of the B•1 bomber, de- „w,n,tngtgnsurstairwriter . eat, Jean Pelletier, had known ern eat of the neutron bomb and the cly for the resumption of a Hughes w~l,disclose ttoday It S44miRl F't' Ffi' * a r y, c lag 1hetAmericans butAkept it qh time draft, until they had escaped, %Yn had told the committee. lion thass•transit;pack'sge, `!n eer t4l r ;i a Government officials here eDe tes may be facing which the state •w d pay, ik 'r t> 5, a e the United Sta quarters of *the. s s.oper P $ t Y' f'M°' f $fe+CANAAA, ltical turning point" in history, r s sK '•s r t• 5 ..h its continued economic and at The 1ong~aw ed 1 n ate offs + #'+•G. t ' ctais said last ht for beefing~~1 t r ,,t"a Ser~at~ large Office up the sptate'tra ortativn trust ,`s rtx #t f or Me o by,increpsing fund to a F-w 'rrlOteC VOhI regl9tratioll-fees by $5 W), Mid -to $8 and it ' f otol,B'corporate in r To Boycott ret~aStS N~U came to an otor vehicle excise r v tax reve !h the fund, P(yi','% By Lisa Myers, ~98U Reee~s~~n The la 1so ll for the state t MOM I n d e $4.1 million 1n Woshingtonstar stair Writet voted ce, nigdmery and GOV. hARRXR.HUGK Thu Senate yesterday By Jonathan iruerbringer I,rll G o s counties fori debt, Rejects gas txx boost . ` whelmtngly (o urge all Amer WashingtonSlirStallWtiter . SefVi o rorail construction and friends of the United ME f ;The Congressional Budget GtifieO bond 9 In,recent days, Hugghes has been not only athletes to boyyce sterday predicted •a mild 1980 The h packagetwhich, is to repeatedly warned by le islative 1980 summer Olympicsin•Mosr ;cession and al sluggish Oconoralc be pee -~d today tb legislative", leaders that any gas tax increase The rso tturn by the end of the year, 1.tila• leaders? b~eribs of briefings, must would be politically unacceptable tougherereaction'top ~e SovleE an is expected to moderate only now go to t General Assembly for this year in light of the state's bulg• tghtly and, unemployment is peg- appproval..'' Ing surplus, estimated%to be,nenrly sion of Afghanistan than Vol 1Yith thb new Metro proposal, the $300 million, week by the House in that it d ':d b en i4 7.2 percent and 8.2 per. 'ant by y the end of 1980, . goverpor alas sidestepped q major. The issue of how to fund Metro 'make thb boycott cont'ngen, ' battle in the General Assembly by and the"Baltirrtorysubway system Soviet troops remainingln•Ai C in 1p81, iriflatlun ~s predicted to rejecting a• tweet in the state's ga4o- tan beyond Feb. 20. ;did almost steady, w1tli unemploy °The declslon to boycott t hitting 7,5 to lirte•tax a move he g11GC~v~Y cow mes should be a clew aent becomin ,Worse, 5 percent by the erid of the year. ,,..-~''~Y . • standa, a firm response ,to t! The for _fast for 1980; which we ~~S 5~1'iC`t sion itself and to the fact 4ubmltted by C130 Director Alice M. drliia'In f lodr a Soviet breach of.interar4lt Amin, is In line with both the as e • has'made 'it unfit 'to hos h , umptions•in the Carter budget, and TuC e, in Yif ate ~a~(~ 5 Bill: t whose high elm is prom' those of other major private ore 1 international good will and castors, B anco Ga has coine finder strong attack irom.e cooperation," declared Se The recession will be mild, Rivlin By tY rch, D•]daho, the cfie said, because U,S. exports will'in• wa9hu,atousterstaff wriie~ few Housti"liberals Who threatened Chu ShOrch n daho the t Relations dom) Senate r' l to use ple she promise of a veto b!+ out consl&i anon on the floor draw • Moreover, the Senate (crease. while imports decline. In Des asks Se ( Peeled q, business spending is ex President garter, the Mouse Is bar- Mike the H ~ State Cyrus Vance to ref ater lousy.ones ° sai mix c' of Rep, good Floy projects and , u foals to persuade America' recess to pick up sooner than In past aulthorizerSg"pot k its biennial , bati el" water "This is a recessions. will be weak be• This tim., the bill Includes D•Ind., one of a handful, of'House, But the upswing projects. members who attacked the biennial and allies to follow the l cause inf,atton is expected to persist, money for-dams, dredging, diver: sure, I boycotting the ggames. short-term Interest rates will remain ' slons-and a $300,000 marina. tuea'" sherd is a coalition of people yc thigh t1r, a that t high and future Social Security sax The marina as planned' for the it is of here weldo together by. past who have' on Occasion I bites will out consumer buying ' home distridt Rep, Ray Roberts, D present ro sets and future ride because we were j pother, she said, Texas, the floor manager of the 54,4• projects, p j the economic predictions are billion bill, Roberts, chairman of tine projects,' he complained, "It's not a carry the ball,/.. now 81 matter of being in-the majority party be ct•unted," said Sen,'J; based on budget assumptions that }IgUse Public Works subcommitfeg if it's a public works project." R-N.V. He estimated thni Rep. Robert W. Edgar, [).Pa., led aircasy are prepared to are close to the pro osal unveiled that wrote the le Islatloti, is retiring Monday by President Carter. The at the end of this term. the effort Yesterday to get the with the United'States on C}3d is expected to cotutpieto an anal. The water trill,' which authorizes re e f for R gstes' dislrlct stripped The Senate also wen ysls of'the Cantor budget later this some'200 daroA in just about every , Troia the aCguing that the yond the House in urg wrok. state as well as a monument here proposal, See MARINA, A•9 Americans boycott 1! See BUDGET, A•A to the Army Corps of Engineers - ~ • 4 THE WASHINGTON STAR Wednesday; ,January30, 1960 ed ~n oil 91 ,ram District. ~S 1:; CU~ farina -in FfOar Mann pi alive at the behest r' kage Continued From A•1 water shortage ir130 years, opean'dumping of wastes and to re• is only being ke Harsha said the issue is'whelher quest furtber. study of the of Rep. Jahn Myers, R•Ind, Myers is a smessor•to the subcommittee nppproved it without, the Cangreso or the president has , Cennessee•Tomplgbge River navtga•.. the ranking Republican on then Fartp'r' end Brown any report on fts merits from the the power to deteritilne water policy Lion project "they hrgest public, House Appropriations of subcommittee wetter te.f nding for the Corps ofEngineers: for-the natlpn,, works proJ,ectinthe•gountry•° that handles fundjng,• rya • "Its no( in the befit interest of the if the liouse'were to bow to Car. Fnvironnientelists, 6'oweyer; did projects, this program fight $190: -when the H ~~e voted FlthtJ tried to hay t.h"The a c.waste ontinuo of . ment to to• stop Sh' S1Q0;3• ilito second dropped on the bests have the project, de• the narrow tratinn can shpt down developing the I EJ ar ra ect the pass of its subpart, of *,h s to ar u easnarlna'l uestlott would' be P e s threats; lie said, ;",'simply bY tot• stag 'of ne a hydroelectric p. j ' ew Soviet air, iece by.p[ece,m , 0p~reventitfrom h p q L1b y ReSuIa6g,Daln'in M4nlgna. Roberts them:pulled the legisln Ett,}`t14to Sovi t e!r• located on I:ak 'Texom in Texas t ltEat ar review verCe said he. has "The subcommittee alsq proposed in tion back off the floor before taking k, @ largely suburbanFourth Cohgres• received letters•of oppos[tlon'to the the leglslatloi3 to deauthorize' : a vote on Fittilan's umendinenhan ' ' clonal District, just north of t)nilas Ft. Worth ' paberts;'who succeeded projects from, envlronme:ital'and another hydroelectric oroJeet, the promised to bring It :up sometime citizen, groups Including the Na. controversial' 'DickeyLlncoin hater, O'Neill has said that if.the r. nel " former House SpeakgrSam Rayburn tional Wildlife Federation,, the,, Schools Dam hi Malne,legislation was not finished yester• ,rr '.y as the dir•',rlct's representative, is de- 'Sterra.Club, the National ,Taxpayers, An effort mounted by Fithian; and 0 r., Almanac of . day, it would be fitted into the sehedi S scribed In the currant issue of The, 19 oft}er p js . „ gne;rf• whir ule for furtherde¢ate next month. cans l,nfon, for Common C DeMocratic ause Action: and Amori• 12 other ma embbe e rs, to deauthoriz In adcf[tto edye li to the rdonument'tp + 'Amt r(can Politics tis a man with. encyclopedic ktiowG • Edgar;'however, found, himself dotes bock to.1935 Was blocked . the Corps of Engineers, the bill 1n. of Texas Oxasdams," with little gupport on the'floor, to porarily.bythesu,bcommittee, clµdes funds for an' ant!-erosion , , ' k)dgar yesterday also lost a•sertes afayette Lake a r recreot}on.. project on Tangier Island, Va,,,ond !G spite the objentions of Edgar , uidry Jr. and 5~other,.Rep, William H, 'Ha i R•O.th rose to the defense a the of voice,vatcs un measures to limit project slated fqt iorthern Indiana tiregging of. the Anacostta River, „ marinai ®rei ~rWttt<r ~o"C hairman Roberts has been here C hJiFy!gralgn. Relations ,R ~~SS+LA~~~~~1 'al~A[~~! lgcld,q to launch all day; defending the projects pf Fan l 'Uy. 17 4 01p b n national study other c6hgres.Smen and here, we are his di n'e;u'' for Fauntray'to'conslder.and passed by the state Senate but lost In ~ end national askinggstrltheet', small A slSm of lousy $300, $300,040000 to for By Michael r a' ' Isikof wrif; e;J}bpes to ;begin ~ wnshfng+onsurS%wieawruer hoped tq present it to Fauritruy'at a ',.tlt~,he pUStionso(some legislators is . I a.moath; concen• construct a mpprina on that lake. Its later meeting., e ldjddle East, Per- really nitpplckfng to 0ke'on'$309,000 ANNAPOLI S D.C. Delegate'Nal•' r tfat they capnot vote fora measure in-a $3•billion bill,'; Harsha Bald, fer ,6, Fauntrol' said yesterdaytha.t I don t know why we have to keep that would likely mean the election t So4rkv est Asia, The house' which7s gettingg blow :h0 1,i constddring !ssuing a public rehashing this, a'gaf ii and again;, of a PI 0 symp'athlzer to the U S Sen• ~t,is; ton of Af• .tocompleting workonthebillvoted stat(m,ent criticizing the PLO to Fauntroy said yesterday, "I've at• ate. -my The D C, ei?iendment; which has fn railed the great- down EdSor's amendment' by voice sa~isfy Jewisb legislators w,ho are ready madsft. veey plain;What e since Wor) War vote after 14arsha.sdid tliat. thn withhgQiding support for the D.C., mission of eeconcilioilon (to Lebq: onlycleared seven state legislatures I "memb rs awe Mr. Roberts a vnta of VotlngRlghtsAmendment non) ,was all about:.f'have co" prime was passed by'Congress in .1 1 !ni m, a prime thanksg + me In five ' Y ' ' demned the terfgrisnt of the PLO, 197S;'woul ive District residents . omtniN6ittee for the . At the heb'est of the a¢minlstra• Fbr, the secolid t da s, , . 't!rgll Intention was Faunlroy came hero 40 lobby a hand, Batas a'result of the msetinggs fn voting representation in both 1 tion, the Corps of Engineers least ful of Jewish legislators who sayy. Annapalls,, A'aifntray,added, '1,,am h~o,tises of Congress as h thl+ pistrIct ' 'td f tl i ollc year withheld final reports an' the ihey'mayy switch their vbtes on D.C. 'looking and 'soaruhing for ways to were a'eote, Fauntroy is now a non, ucAin nto new water projects: Carter vetoed the yotingrights because of tti'r, coif res, y p , g. ~PR gg lirw's public works bill ih 1978 and . make clear m ositior, for an end to votir dolegato In 1110 0S, House of ,With 1110 Soviet sional delegate's enSbrace of LO the violence" in t11e.Mideast Represegtatives. R barktQq it ;big arms g tiny chief Ylisser, Arafat in Lebanon Of the 24 Jewish in mbers of the come upm r a vote in the SQtiate Con hid ew aegis atlon essio lthho d my timber, -last o t four' "fha; for axpected`to' l 1 r1 n s mbl on+y aeon stitulfonol hod Public Law Commit IoW a well•thoughh of a study'af water resources, During',a 90 minute closed•dogr Ceneral As e Yi% ship the or fiv0 have thre eatened to cliange tee on,Frtday and Will probably be { ,f0n said yes. No neW water protects are con, meeting, the t thlegislators negotiated ,their:vot0s'an D.C. vdttng rights this on the Senate floor, by.ne.4t week, ac. + i;! ymiL".ttee deeislon, talned in Carter s 1Pisca11981 budget, with Fauntroy for the release of a Year becaus vr~ti osfstce PLO he beissue,criticalbeHow• • 'cording to; key senators. But the, l ott} of an ahem t pause Speaker Thomas P. O'Netil,, public statdinent denouncing PLO major battle over the amendment pp 'ell tpqq~pl, R•Okla„ to, D -Mass,-, decided to push the legisla• terrorism, ever, beca cause of the,closcness of the v¢te in t came utltll later Ip tbo session ioW.tareign defense licy Lion on the floor this year in spite of . Delegate Steven,V„yklar; D•Balti the Ma - rylnitd House,wo-wdheons,en the a uhtl begins its a ses ion Carters promise toveto, more, saiti-later that,the le I$Iators lbera. w, ' elm a wanted the O'Neill g t e a state- Last your; the anteri~1 ment Was, said the 'nation will face. a were-working ono „Ifrnf e the So11410 votrd COMMIT'fFd81 - RAY ROBERTS CHAIRMAN A I A 0I9TR4T. T9%A8 VETHRANS' AFFAIRS wMHINR70N O►ra[I iii~rrrr A I~~' PUBLIC) WORKS AND 2184 RAV*UwN Houec OF►ICC BDIlFINO ~AV ,v.N A+~cl~ Ai 4 81Fi f to x TRANBPURTATION I immc(202)28b-"7D ii ``LLiF11ii~L iJp~ljp~ VVv t V R4` 6U►DOMMI7YR[c1 WATRR RRROUROIM. CHAIRMAN G DIATRICT O►►ICR61 au~~ of RepratutatibN EUR►ACC TRANa►OI.YATION B-w FcIN;RAL 6UILDINO ! ,rte OVXR[IONT AND H[Vlcw y , n[IYTONTRxAR 76101 at•'"'V{"O♦♦,~, 6V7~, we. 20$15 it i A-108 F[O[RAI, pU1lAINb 7) 1 ' MCKmN2V,TcxA* 76868 Rot r4WA .WIUNIwI January 30, 1.980 SammAN, TcxAS 78690 All r wcNU IkIlLm a 3 Tium, TXX" 78702 1 I Dear Christ Thank you so much for your January 25 letter concerning the Resolutions approved by the Denton City Council. The Resolution concerning the name change for Aubrey is most t } flattering and an awesome honor. I just, hope it won't have a negative affect. The success for Aubrey must be shared by many, and l commend ; w you for your hard work. It was good to see you last week wh yo were in town. 4 in ely , s Mr, Cris Hartung City Manager City of Denton E Municipal. Builli ligf, I Denton, 'texas P,20.1 1 1 I ~ E 'I i ~I I;. Dir CITY OF DALLAS February 4, 1980 Charles W. Lively, Lt. Col., C.E. Fort Worth District, Corps of Engineers P. 0, Box 17300 Fart Worth, Texas 76102 pear Col. Lively; z Your taking the time to attend the January 34 City Council meeting is j appreciated. The City Council's favorable action on Aubrey Reservoir is an expression of confidence in the Corps of Engineers' partnership role in this water resource project. We look forward to the opportunities for federal/local cooperation that r this venture offers. Please let me know any time l can be of assistanc6~ In 'expediting this very important water resource project. Sincerely, j ,eo ae Schrader f Ci't C lager ' Gtp x~i~9~, ~ j , t Of ME DF THE CITY MANAUM CITY HALL DALLAS, TEXAS 75201 TELEPHONE 214670-M, Y i *T' EeAff) 7 CITY OF DALLAS February 5, 1980 i 1 Colonel Donald J. Palladino # U. S. Corps of Engineers P. 0, Box 17300 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Dear Colonel Palladino: 1 On January 30, 1980 the Dallas City Council authorized the Cite Manager to enter' Into water supply and recreation contracts for Aubrey Reservoir. A copy of the i Council Resolution is attached. I am aware that draft contracts are now under review. i + The Dallas staff expects to complete Its review of the contractsi within a few dayu, It is my understanding that final contracts most be negotiated and slgngd by the City of Dallas and the Corps of Engineers prier to the start of construction, s During the final iotiatlons I hope we can find a way for the federal government to cover the cost flood control improvements included in the preliminary r design. This reservoir Is a vital Dallas Is eager to proceed with Aubrey Reservoir, element In the long range plan for development of water supplies for this region. 1 Furthermore, the project can make a significant contribution to the 'energy ~ conservation efforts of the n- Jon because of Its unique gravity flow potential. We appreciate the outstanding cooperation of your staff and look forward to the 1 successful completion of Aubrey Reservoir. i r 1 4oqAe ours, chrader r Enc. a ~ VNIMMME, r4h f I 7 i i 07NrCE OF THE CITY MANAGM CRY HALT DALLAS. 1E%A5 76201 'rEW)HONE 3117870.3302 f 4 P r.. i r `rr., ONC11. CHAM13ER January 30~ 19~; _ 8 004 WHEREAS, in order to meet projected water requirements for the City of Dallas and iia customer cities beyond the year 20005 Aubrey Reservoir is identified in Dallas' Long Range Water Supply Study as the next potential water supply source; and, WHEREAS, the City of Dallas (74% share) and the City of Denton (26% share) h5)ld permits for water rights in Aubrey, the last feasible site for a, gravity floor source in the upper Trinity basin; and, WHEREAS, they U. S. Army Corps of Engineers has received authorization from Congress for Aubrey as a multiple purpose reservoir for water supply and recreation pursuant to the River and Harbor Act of 1965; and, WHEREAS, a financial feasibility study conducted by LWF'W Inc. for the Cities of Dallas and Denton concluded ghat the Aubrey Project with construction and financing by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers was the most economical water 1 resource alternative available to the cities at this time; and, WHEREAS,, the two cities must enter into tyater supply and recreation contracts j with the federal government before construction can begin; and, WHEREAS, the inclusion of recreation as one of the purposes for the project makes federal participation possible and reduces the cost to Dallas for water k. supply; and, WHEREAS, it is and should remain the City of Dallas' operating policy to G+ conserve energy resources by making maximum use of all gravity flow water j supply sources including Lake Aubrey; and, WHEREAS, planning for recreational activities at the reservoir will recognize that the water level will fluctuate quite frequently as the reservoir is used for water supply, its primary purpose; and, WHEREAS, it is desirable for c:nstruction of this water supply resource to begin at the earliest e timt~; Now Therefore: pos.l0 ibl ~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALLAS: ;`Section 1. That the City tanager be authorized to execute water supply and ►°-recreational contracts with the United States Army Corps of Engineer] for the ','Aubrey Reservoir Project, after contract documents are approved by the City t1 Attorney. ;section 2. That the City Council will allocate funds at the appropriate time r Xk)r annual repayment of Dallas' share of actual construction costs for water ,,apply and recreation and for actual operation and maintenance costs for water pupply and recreation. { ~,,Section 3. That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after r~7 its passage i n accordance with the ; rovi si ons of the CharterT oho, i f mo he f n e,p,neiwt5 Dallas and It is accordingly so resolved. i e proper ~s a I ad k r of the city of 19813 APP AI PRI~VEi1_ Lyyy~,yyy % APPRO _ APPROVE 0~. ~.6 .C Y. MAHAOER(~It1 T.4 ~i;ilS'^1 17Y f FEAp OF DfIP R NCHT I' ON 5400006 • !1 o F~L r7f~+G~t rt t~i . 1 L Y~ Memordriduni moon) CITY CAF DALLAS DOE February 7, 1964 To Camille Cates Barnett Assistant to the city Manager SUBJECT Aubrey Project f Letters to Texas Delegation , r~ . The attached letter has been drafted for the Mayor's signature -which I think is appropr'ate' However, Mr. Schrader might Prnfer to :31gn it• The important thing is that the letter be released r,c later than February 13. They need to be in the Congressmen's hands prior to:'tha budget hearings which begin February 196 ' Enclosed with the draft letter is the data sheet to ,be attached to each whom 'tits letters letter and the list of Congressmen and Senators to should be sent, r. , f s Thomas E. Taylor Assistant Director Water Utilities s. mb } Attachment t I I i I 1/N IIO.OOSI .i, i DRAFT February 1980 To be mailed no later than February 13) ( (To Texa;t Senators and North Texas Congressmen) Dear : You are familiar with the proposed Aubrey Reservoir which for over 20 t " years has been planned for construction north of the City of Denton. Various problems have delayed the project; but, within the last month , both the City of Dallas and the City of Denton have authorized local sponsorship contracts with the Corps of Engineers. We urge your support a of construction funds in the 1980-81 federal budget, ' Consttruction of Aubrey Reservoir on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River in j Denton`, Grayson, and Cooke Counties of Texas is expected to provide 73 s., million gallons of water per day to serve approximately 20 cities in the north Texas area. The total cost of the Aubrey Project is currently estimated in 1979 dollars to be $230,451,040 (federal share: $70,792,000,, f ~ $169,659,000). The Cities of Oallas and. Denton will serve local; share: as local sponsors and will be responsible for ropaying the local share with intarest to the Federal Government. s Budget hearings are scheduled to commence in mid-February. General J. C. Donovan, Division: Engineer, Southwest Division will present the j proposed Corps of Engineers budget for this area. The decision by Dallas and Denton cams after the budget was prepared; therefore, additional funding for Aubrey was not included in the Admin'istration's budget. However, the Corps is expected to have the capability to begin construction If Congress authorizes the -funds. i i Both Dallas and Menton are equr to proceed with Aubrey Reservoir, This reservoir is a vital element in the long range plan for development of ! water supplies for this.region. The project can make a significant contribution to the energy conservation efforts of the Wition because of its unique gravity flow potential. If this reservoir is not built, a conservative estimate is that pumping water Orom alternative reservoirs in East Texas would consume 6,4 million barrels of o91 in 50 years. You know that North Central Texas is a water short area, therefore, we need ! to develop to the maximum the limited water resources that are available, Attached is a fact sheet on the Aubrey Project for your information and use, I Your active support will be appreciated. If we can supply further r. - information, or if yru have suggestions concerning this important effort, • f please let me know. 4 'f Sincerely, Robert S. Folsom, Mayor F City, of Dallas k I ti , 1 ,ay AUBREY RESERVOIR PROJECT FACT SHEET i PROJECT; Aubrey Reservoir Project United States Corps of Engineers i LOCATION: On Elm Fork of the Trinity River, in northeast ' Denton County, extending, into Cooke and Grayson ` Counties. f 'd' ! DESCRIPTION: A U,S. Army Corps of Engineers reservoir with a total i. controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, of which 749,200 acre-feet is water supply conservation Storage. The reservoir will cover approximately 36,900 acres (flood control pool). HISTORYt The Aubrey Project has been included as an potential water supply reservoir in Denton's and Dallas' long range water supply planning for over 20 years. The Aubrey Project was identified as a potential reservoir site by the Corps of Engineers in a 1938 study of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River. It is the last remaining g site for a }gravity flow reservoir in the E3m Fcrk of the P Trinity River Basin, LOCAL PARTNERSHIP: Dallas and the City of Denton have State permits for the water rights in Aubrey, with Dallas owning 74% share sriA j Denton 26%, Likewise,; any. costs iii the Aubrey, proj act will be shared by Dallas and Denton at this same rate, r E ` CONSTRUCTION COST: 'Dallas' Share of '.investment - $118,148,000 f (At 1979 Price Denton's Share of Investment - 41,5110000 Levels) Corps' Share of'Investment - 70,792,000 1 i J Total Project Investment $230,451,000 ' E Cost estimates are by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, i Actual, costs (when known) will be paid over 60 years at I an annual interest rats of 7.21%. (interest rate subject to change if project is not started by September 30, 1980) i FEDERAL PARTNERSHIP: The Aubrey project has been authorized by U.S. Congross in the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1965. YIELD; Total, additional dependable yield from Aubrey - 73 million gallons per day PROJECT SCHEDULE; Land Acquitsition and Construction - 6 to 10 years. Filling Reservoir - normally 5 to 10 years. f CURRENT FUNDING; Fundh to initiate preconstruction planning were appropriated in FY 70 and for initiation of construction in FY 75. r Approximately $1.4 million from prio_ year carry over appropriations are available for 'FY 80. .....-1_ „iii•i..,....,,,,„..,,,.,,.,•..,......, . . 1 r NORTH TEW U.S. CONGF M051.0 AL DELEGATION Address Name w4g Russell Senate Office Bldg. r Senator Lloyd Bentsen Washington, D. C. 20510 (202) 224-5922 Senator 3ohn':G. Towner 142 Russell SSenC. office Bldg. Washington, ff , I(202) 2242934 2419 Rayburn House Office Building Jim Collins Wa6ington, D.C•' 20515 (202) 225.4201 123-Longworth House Offica Bldg. Frost Washington, T3,C. 20515 f Nax~ n (20?) 224-3121 ' 1609 Longworth house Office Bldg. r 'Phil Gramm Washington, D,C, 205115 3 (202) 224-3121 F House Off;lcA Building Cannon I 120 Teak Hightower Washington, D,C. 20515 (202) 225-370 orth gouge Office Building ' 1331 Longw ; Marvid Lesth Washington, D.C. 20515 (202) 224-3121' 1127 Longworth House. Office Tsuilding Jiw Matto% Washington, D.C. 205:15 ' (202), 225.2231 Ct3urles W. Stenholra 1610 Longworth House Office Bldg. Washington, D.c. 20515 (202) 224-3121 i r, Jim Wright , 2459 Rayburn House Office Building L Washington, D,C. 20515 i (202) 225-5071 Senators Address - Senator John Doe Salutation - Dear Senator Dos I I ' Representatives Address M The Hot.orable John Doe C House of Representatives Salutation - Dear Mr. Doe I i ~ s t y F 1 i I E i r ' y :w, , S f wo" r 00 1 f E 201 / TELEPHONE (017) 5668200 AS 76 ctTYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76 Office of the rity Mane 1 i February 14, 1980 ~~Jll I ~ Colonel Donald'J. Paladino 4 District Engineer D. S. Corps of Engineers } P. 0. Box 17300 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Dear Colonel Paladino: The staff and Legal Counsel of the City of Denton have reviewed the draft; contract for water storage and the contract for recreational development associated with the Aubrey Reservoir project submitted by your office. We have also discussed the r draft contracts with representatives of the City of Dallas. The e City of Denton generally concurs with the terms of the contracts as proposed by the Corps of Engineers. We do, however, support the proposed modifications which are being submitted by the City I of Dallas and would ask for favorable consideration of these 3' i suggeoti,ono by your office. `Additionally, we would request that in Article 51 Section E of the contract for water storage space, C j and in the proposed Article 3 of the contract for recreation I + development, the words "City's combined Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System" be replaced with "City of Denton Water and sanitary Sower System Revenue Fund". Also, in the same paragraphs where the words "City's Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer' System Revenue Bonds" are used that they he replaced with "the I :n City of Dent.an Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds". i 1 ,I if d 1 l K ¢t c. s Colonel Donald J. Paladina February 14, 1980 Page Two We will be most happy to meat with repreoentatives from your office to discuss in detail the finalization of these two most vital contracts. We are very appreciative of the cooperative spirit with which your staff has conducted' these contract negotiations and are looking forward to the day when we can ,formally execute these documents. sincerely, G. Chris Hartung City Manager GCH:jm CC, George Schr~4dex' Toni Taylor ; t s' s i , i ! tEI` { j i_ t ~ i { { 1 ' t r S5: -A - - - - _ - - --1bi. l dollas water mis City Hall • Dallas, Texas 75277 • (2t4)670-:011 February 18, 1980 Mr. Chris Hartung, City Manager City of Denton 215 F., McKinney Denton, TX 76:01 C Dear Chris: f Here is a copy of the lease agreement that the Corps gave me to review on February 14. It is very comprehensive and I plan to t go over it very thoroughly. Sincerely, k 1 Thomas E. Taylor Assistant Director ; I nib Attachment ( A city utility Urovlding Dallas with water purification and distributlon, wadta water collopetion and treatment r - ~ o 1980 CITY of DENTON MANAGER'S OT ICE " Contract No, DACW63-80-C-0000 AUBREY AND LEWISVILLE 'LIAKES EXHIBIT G LEASE AGREEMENT THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY under authority of Section 4 of the Act of Congress approved 22 December 1944, as amended (16 1i6C 460d), and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, 79 Stet. 214 (16 USC 46[13), and pursuant to a contract entered into on by and_be_tweenl- the United States of America and ~Yteraf~`( ~ crrT' c.~r•-J>m.s,n'si lDRc..c.+f1 44-n,` Ilvx tF~eftC.l~~~w1"V.L referred to as The Contract), hereby grants to N( 1)&4, III hereinafter referred to as the lessee, a lease for a period of Ft1~7'~(5a) r years commencing on" A ndin~+; on"7, to use ,JJC DCO L e c- A F~f JZC1j~'la fA V,, acrers of land and water areas under the ! primarysdictIon of the Department of the Army in tho Project Area, hereinafter referred to as the premises, as shown on attached Exhibit..,...... IAcuC? t'iVt~~'. Pt Y't' f~.,X,~,Qt=, THIS LEASE is granted subject to the following conditions: 1, The lessee shall conform to such regulations as the Secretary of the Army may issue to govern the public use of the project:, area, and shall comply with the provisions of the above cited Acts of Congress. The lessee shall protect the premises from fine, vandalism, and soil erosion, and may make and enforce such regulations as are necessary a{nd within its legal authority, in exercising the privileges granted in this loose, provided that such regulations are not inconsistent with thooae issued by the Secretary o.f the Army or with provisions of the above cited Acts of Congress. 2., The lessee agrees to administer the land and water,' areas included 11 in the lease for recreation purposes, kind to bear the costs of-operation, maintenance and replacement of all facilities and improvements on the premises at the commencement of this lease or added during z_ica term. As used in this lease, the term "replacement" shall be construed to mean the replacement in whole or in part of any structure or improvement so worn or damaged by any cause as to no longer adequately serve its detyignated function with normal. maintenance. The lessee shall be guided by au Annual Plan of Operation and Maintenance in furtherance of 'the Plan of Recxe+ati,on Development and Management adopted pursuant to Article 2c of The. Contract and by this reference made a part hereof. On or before the anniversary date of the lease each year, the parties :ahall agree on the Annual. Plan which shall ! include but is not Wilted to the following: a. Plans for management activities to be undertaken by the lessee itAcluding improvements and other facilities to be constructed thereon ill accordance with The Contract. { i G-1 i i IfV I 1 k i 1 I' b. Report of the managenent; maintenance and development accomplish- ments of the lessee for the preceding year. e. Significant modifications of policies or procedures which have developed or are to be applied. I , i d. Minor modifications to the Plan of Recreation Development and Management (major modifications to be accomplished by amendment of the Plan). f 3. In addition to the fees and charges authorized under the provisions : of Article 5 of The Contract, the lessee and his sublessees may conduct such f revenue producing; activities as are within the scope of Article 4 of The I Contract.. Except for timber salvaged and sold by the lessee when in the way of construction, all salev of forest products will be conducted by the h 0overnment and the proceeds therefrom shall not be'available to the lassea under this provisions of this ;Lease. The lessee will reserve at least one area at which access to the waters and shores of tho reservoir may be reached without imposition of fees of any kind. No facilities need be k provided at this area by the lessee, but normal maintenance and clean-up , .w'Al,l.be,prova.dec~» 4. That upon the commencement of this lease the parties hereto shall cause to be made an inventory of all improvements constructed in whole or. 4 in }part„ W.th Pedera.l funds under the terms of The Contract,. From time to time there shall be added to said inventory such addit:ionrtl improvements j as may be bunstructed pursuant to the aforesaid contract. Certain types of ''Additional Facilities", including but not limited to restaurants, lodge, golf courses, cabins, clubhouses, overnight or vacation type structures, stables, marinas, swimming pools, commissaries, chairlif•ts and such similar revenue producing facilitie3 constructed,under the authority of Article 4 of The Contract shall not be added to this inventory, The inventory of improvements shall include descriptions and drawings sufficient ,to permit their identification and condition, and to replace them if required during the term or on,the expiration or termination ot! this lease. Said inventory and all amendments thereto shall be approved in writing by authorized repro- sentatives of the parties hereto and shall thereupon become a part of this ' least as if originally annexed. 5. The .lessee may grant permits and licenses, and sublease all or portions of the Jeased ' property for purposes cobich are consistent with the j terms and conditions of this lease and with the Plan of Recreation Development and Management, All such grants she 1 sate that they are granted subject to the provisions of this lease. On res a where concessions are operates; under leases granted by she Government or by its other grantees the terms r and conditions of permits, licenses, and subleases granted by the lessee for revenue producing purposes shall first be approved by the District ` EnSineer in wr,itinS• In order to protect the investments of sublessees, Lhe District Engineer is authorized to approve subleases which require the Government to continue to honor such parts of the Eubleaoes which may be k I / f 1 i necessary to assure the continuation of the subleased activities upon at default which would result in a revocation rf the prime ;Lease under Condition 15 hereof. b. No permits, licenses or subler•.oes will be 'granted to adjacent private property owners for use, alteration, improvement, addition of facilities, or an other purpose which would confer upon. them privileges not fivaflable to the general public or which would infez or imply exclusive priveite use of public lands. Any permits, licenses or subleases granted to adjacent private proper,ky owners for use, alt-.-cation, improvement, addition of facilities, or any other purpose will be. sc, `iondd such as: a. Not to restrict use thereof by the general public, b., To. permit free and unimpeded passage along, the shore. c. To 'be compatible with the Project Master Plan, Forest Management 1 Flan and the Environmental, Impact Statement adopted for the project. d. To have signs posted to the effect that "This is public property I' open to general public use." The essee shall establish and maintain adequate recorab and accounts and 'render annual, statements, of receipts and expenditures to the District Engineer, except for annual or weekly entrance-fees which also are honored ct other recxeational area; operated by the lessee, The District Engir,~er shall have the r:tght to erfonn audits of F the lessee's records and accounts and to require t ~ he lessee to audit the records Lind accounts of 11 sublessees, and furnish the District Engineer a copy of the results of such and audit, i The rates and price4i charged by-the lessee or its granteeq for revenue producing activities shall be reasonable and comparable to rates i ; charg,ed~4q j. sin ilar goods and services by others in the community and on I the r az CLz. The Government: shall have the right to review such rates and prices and require an .inc-Tease or reduction where it finds the objective or, this paragraph has been v;olaced. 9. The right is reserved to the United States, its officers, agents, and employees, to enter upon the premises at any time to make inspections cone^erning the operation and mailitenance of the lands and faciliti.eti pro- video hemundar, and for any purpose necessary or convmiient in connection with river and h«rbor and flood control work, and to remove timber or other material required for such work; to flood the premises when necessary; and/or to make any other use of the land an may be necessary in connection with pub- lic navigation and flood control; and the lessee shall have no claim for damages of any character on account thereof against the United States or any agent, officer or employee thereo,E, (;_3 { C^~ 10. The United States shall not be responsible for damages to property or injuries to persons which may arise from or be incident. to the exercise of the privileges herein granted, or for damages to the property of the lessee, or for damages to the property or injuries to the person of the lessee's officers, agents, servants., or employees or others who may be on the premises at their invitation or the invitation of any one of them, arising from or incidenr. to the flooding of the premises by the Government or flooding from any other cause, or arising from or incident to any other governmental activities 11. The lessee or its grantees shall not discriminate against any person ur peraons because of race, crud, color, sex, age or national ori- s gin in the conduct of its operations hereunder. The lessee has furnished as part of The Contract an assurance that it will comply with Title VI of 61 the Civil Rights Act of 1464 (78 Stat. 241) and Department of Defense Directive 5500,11 issued pursuant thereto and published as Part 300 of Title '32, Code of Federal Regulations, and all grantees shall supply like assurances. 12. This lease is subject to all existing easements, and easements subsequently,granted, for roadways, and utilities and for other purposes located or to be located on the premises; provided that the proposed grant of any easement will be coordinated with the lessee and easements will not be granted which will, in the opinion of the District Engineer, interfere with developments, present or proposed, by the lessee. 13. The lessee shall comply promptly with any regulations, conditions or :instructions affecting the activity hereby authorized if and when issued ' + by the Environmental Protection Agency and/or a State Water Pollution Control Agency having; Jurisdiction to abate or prevent water pollution. the Such regulations, conditions or instructions in effect or prescribe by Environmental Protection Agency or State Agency are hereby made a condition of this lease. 14. This lease may be revoked by the Secretary of the Army in the event the lessee violates ony of the to ,s d ondit.ions of this lease and continues and persists therein for MAI (W) days after notice thereof, in writing, by the District Engineer. Such a termination shall not derogate f or diminish such other remadi,es in law as may be available to the Government and in no way shall it act to relieve the lessee of his responnibil-,%ties and obligations under The Contract. In lieu of-revocation, the District Engineer, to his discretion, upon a finding that a violation constitutes a health or safety hazard may suspend the use of that operation or facility until such deficiency is rectified. 15. on or before the date of expiration of this lease, the lessee t I shall vacate the premises, remove. its property therefrom, and restore the j premises to a condition satisfactory to the District Engineer. If, however, this lease is revoked, the lessee shall vacate the premises, remove its ! property therefrom, and restore the premises as aforesaid within such time j as the Secretary of the Army may de8ignate. In either event, if the lessee ! G-l+ k L - - shall fail or neglect to remove its property and so restore thei premises, then its property shall become the property of the United States without compensation therefor, and no claim for damages against the United States, or its officers or agents shall be created by or made on ticcount thereof, 3.6. All notices to be-, given pursuant t0 this lease shall be addressed, s if to the lessee, to Cf T~' oft 'UH.: 4%4;+ j 4 if to the Government, to Fort Worth District, Corps of Engineers, PO Box 17300, Fort Worth, Texas 76102, or as may from time to time be directed by the parties. Notice shall be deemed to have been duly given if and when f inclosed in a properly sealed envelope or wrapper, addressied as aforesaid and deposited postage 2repaid (or, if mailed by the Government, deposited under its frankine privilege) in a post office or branch post office regularly maintained by the United States Government.' r .+.,•..i'...'. /'.11-'JJ•Ir~'AI-I-.r.(Y1 ll..•qMy%Wf•M.1'~'WNYt•.I.MMM•lMN.. • 17.(To-be-~e~~bed~i-~lr~.fed!S~1ea+e?ed»~ That at the time of the commencement of this lease, the lepree will obtain from a reputable insurance company, acceptable to the Government, liability or indemnity insurance providing for minimum limits of $50,000600 per person in any-,one 4 claim, and an aggregate limit of $150,000.00 for any number of persons or claims arising from any one incident with. respect to bodily injuries or l .death 'reskiltitig therefrom,, ant] ~ 05,000.00, for damage ...to property suffered , or alleged to' have been suffered by any person or persons resulting from the operations of the lessee under the terms of this lease. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand by (authority of the Secretary of the Army this Aay of 19h z sp,uV r i G-5 r . r S i THIS LEASE is also executad by the lessee this_Alday of tSEA'LL y (Post Office Address) t i i lip Y SIgnead and sealed.in tho presence of: a ti ` (post Office Address) i ~ E Signed and sealed in the presence of: L ~ ~ 1111 - q i I ' I G4 f • 1 r i_ rx. W an¢ the lessee shall. hold and save the Government, iacluding its officers, age'M1ts, and employees, hatm7,ess from any and e,11 ' such claims, aot including damages due to the fault or negligence of the , 1 rower meat or its contractors. k V., I Ilk -k r t:: tj ~ !t .r k - Sly Fi I ~ ;4 k., I it i , j XX; "kl I 1 1 _ t t It: Y t t t y v.~. a :'I!: S:Y.: L. .t_ f to a t.: ;!t» 'k I t ttj . , :Li dallas water utmtm City Hall • Dallas, Texas 76277 • (214)670`•3011 February 25, 1980 I Mr. Charles D. Travis, Executive Director Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road Austin, TX 78744 r r near Mr. Travis: The Cities of Dallas and Denton retained the consulting firm of LWFW to + conduct a Financial Feasibility Study of Aubrey Reservoir. The study indicates that Aubrey Reservoir should be the next water supply source i for Dallas and Denton. Recently, both Cities authorized their City Managers to execute contracts with the Corps of Engineers to proceed with the construction of Aubrey Reservoir, Attached is a copy of the LWFW report. On February t4 the Cities of Dallas and Denton met with the Ft. Worth District Office of the Corps of Engineers to present t' to draft water supply and recreation contracts proposed revisions is o Aubrey this, meeting the Corps presented the attached lease agreement eforir~eview and indicated that the lease agreement is a required part of the recreation } contract. We would like for you to review this lease agreemert. The Corps indicated that the lease is a standard agreement and is the same agreement that was executed by the Trinity River Authority and the Parks and Wildlife Department for Lakeview Reservoir. Your comments will be appreciated. We look forward to working with you in establishment of a State Park at Aubrey Lake. At your convenience, I would like to discuss with you the i" project schedule and the master plan for recreation development at the lake. sincere omss E. Taylor f Assistant Director Water Utilities Department mb Attachments C:Ch1",1;N1llhtug,,.City Manager of Denton Jeck,Rubinson~~ Director of Park 6 Recreation, City of Dallas fty Vtlllty Dallas with water puri)loatlon and dfstribut)an, waste water colleotlon and treatment 1 r dollds water utdit*S City Hall • Dallas, Toxas 75277 • (214)670-3011 February 27, 1980 R Mr. Chris Hartung, City Manager City of Denton 215 E. McKinney ii Denton, TX 76201 r Dear Chris: Enclosed is an exchange of correspondence with the Corps which, I j beliove, led to inclusion of the "Assurance of Funds" clause in Dallas' t contrlict, Maybe this will give you ideas that can be adapted to Denton's case. { Let mt~ know if you need to see the attachments. Good luck. Sincerely, c F ~ I Tho as E. Taylor Assistant Director i nib ti i r t k L ~ r C t z f l' A city utIIlty providing Dallas with avatar purl fication and distribution, waste water collection Rnc1 treatment i 77 F LAW OFFICES 1i Mr,CALL, PARKHU RST F, NORTON 1400 Mk:RCANTILV DANK BUILDING 1oRnr MCCALL l~ AB,TEXAB 18241 JOHN D. MOCAI.L (1001-I962) PTUN MILIARD PARKMURST 0004"07f) PAULII. AO pA PETER M. TART CLARKNCC CROWS 11 !0!•1 Hfl Nor M. POIN4ETT AREA CODEVA 74E•L501 MICNAnDC. lCRTER ANOELO P. PARKEn O. CMARLEE KODDIDM 1900 February 29, HAND DELIVERED. ;i Mr, Town Taylor, Director Water Utilities Department City Hall Dallas, Texas 75202 r CONTRACT BETWEEN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS k 1 Dear Tom: i Enclosed is a revised memorandwr, restalting from our Mofdthe ~.anahsan meeting. It you have any problems with any language be sure and call on either Jinn Kerley or myself. Yours very truly, s , McCALL, pARKHURST & HORTON BY: 4 ti TIM : am enclosure cc: Mr. 13im Kerley Executive Vice President First Souschwest Ccnupany Mercantile Bank Building s Dallas, Texas 75201 w/enclosure I k . .1C1.;ALL, PARRHURST h Ei01tT(lN MEMORANDUM Date Feb uary 19, 1980 as btr. Jiro Kerley reused Febr.ua;rv15 1980 To: and the file From: Hobo H. h Y McCall CONTRACT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE StubJect; CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS FOR WATER STORAGE SPACES IN AUBREY A'ND'LEWISVILLE LAKES, TEXAS (Draft Date Dec This is a revision of a memorandum dated February 190 1980, following a conference by and eriong Mr. Tom Taylor, Mr. Jim Kerley, and the writer. We were asked to review the above contract to make certain (1) that the above contract would not interfere with future financing of the City which might include refunding of its outstanding Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System Revenue Bonds and (2) that the contrach itself (or a part thereof) 3 could be advance refunded in whole or in part at some future date. On reviewing the contract the undersigned became concerned with the language in paragraph e. of, ARTICLE 5 (page 7). The effect of this paragraph is that the City pledges surplus revenues of the City's combined Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System after providing for all i debt service, reserve or other requirements in connection with the City's"Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System Revenue Bonds now outstanding, or those hereafter issued on the same basis or such other basis as may be approved by ±-He Contrac- Ftng Officer (emphasis added). The foregoing language would seem to protect the right of the City to y issztie additional parity bonds to those outsta.nda.ng, so long as they are issued on the same basis as the outstanding bonds, however, in ox'der to make certain that the contract payments would be junior to refunding bonds that might be issued by the City in the future on a conceivably different basis than the outstanding bonds, we suggest that the words c "o'n a first lien basis" be substituted for the wards "on the ~ccv same basis" underlined above. A second approach would protect the right to refund and also make certain the City has the right to advance refund outstand- ing bonds, without having to have the prc,gram "approved b µJ the Contracting Officer". The second apx.,roach would leave the language as is and add language as follows at the end of the sentence in e. as follows, provided any bonds payable from (1) a first lien on the net revenues from the City's Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System, or (2) money received as interest on, and principal of, obligations unconditionally guaranteed by the Government and irrevocably deposited in escrow for such purpose,shall be considered bonds issued "on the same basis", f Memorandum r~T n 1Ker1oy and the file February 19, 1980 as revised February 25, 1980 t To the knowledge of the under,si.gr ed, contracts oi, this 1 s nature have not to this date been advance refunded in 'Texas ao would seem to be permitted under Article 717k, as amended, ' unc ersicrnedqiintcnr}xiectianewi hano as informally agree?d with the Similar contract that such contract ther matta~x involving a (car part thereof) ~olzla be a proper!'sub•ieot of refunding under Article 717.k, as amendecq. r 3 s r t t t f 1 E I i 3 3 t i Y i r P i. t i i; n r McCALL, 11"AL"UMT & HORTON,,,,,~ I MMORt'uW tNZ Date Febriiary 19, 1980 Mr. Jin Kerley and To: the file From: Hobby H. McCall CONTRACT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TI;E y Subject: TY Or`' f` ALLY T r a F AA'lEIF-?,''.i'Z EP'AZ', ISF `?R"""':.d AUBREY AND LEWISVILLE LAKES, TENAS (Draft bate; 28 Dec 1979)• j We were asked to review.the above contrast to make certain (1) that the above contract would not int-erfere with future financing of the City which might includes refunding of its i outstanding,Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System Revenue ( nonds and (2) that the contract itself (car a part thereof) could be advance refunded in whole or in part at some future date. on reviewing the contract the undersigned became concerned with the language in paragraph ~e. of ARTICLE 5 (page 7). The effect of this paragraph is that the City pledges surplus revenues of the City's combined Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System after providing for all debt service, reserve or other requirements in connection with the City's Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System, Revenue Bonds now outstanding, or thor~e hereafter issued .on the same basis; or such other basis as may be approved by the Cnteac- } :07ng officer (emphasis added). The foregoing language would seem to protect the right of the City to issue additional parity bonds to those outstanding, so long as they are issued on tr, same basis as the outstanding bonds, however, in order. tomake certain that this contract payments would be ;junior to refunding bonds that might be issued by the City in the future on a conceivably different basis than the outstanding bonds, we suggested that the words "on the same•basis" underlined above be deleted. ' Secondly, in order for the City to be certain that it has retained the righC to advance refund its outstanding bonds, I without having to have the program "approved by the Contract- ing officer", it Was suggested that the language, provided ! the City will not be prevented from pledging to such revenue bonds money received as interest on, and principal of, obligations unconditionally guaranteed by the Government and irrevocably deposited in escrow for such purpose," be inserted after the word "Officer" in the quotation above. The suggested language in the second paragraph of this memorandum to be inserted in paragraph e. of ARTICLE 5 of the contract is slightly different from that suggested to Mr. Tom Taylor over the tel,iphone Thursday, and may be more f h I i R .ti . i , Y' } M' morandum kV, Jim Kerley and . the file r0bruarv 19, 1980 s I ; 1 . W I. p$ilatable' to him. It is desirable to make certain that plirm'snion will not have to be obtained from the Contractinq~ 0,!ficei: in order to change the basis for paying the City's } t'~.ttorworks and Sanitary Sewer System Revenue 'Bonds in'the elient of an advance refunding. T6' the knowledge of the ,,undersigned, contracts of this i n,alture have not. to this date been advance refunded in Texas ap would seen► to be permitted under Article 717k, as amended. HoubvOr, the Attorney General has informally agreed with the i 'O4Od~grsigned in connectiosn: with another matter involving ,a similar contract that sue+h a dontiract for part thereof) woul`d'' be ra, proper subject' of refunding tinder Aztiale 717k, 4 as 6m3nded I 3 i 1 i t i 1 it ! 1 - 1. j It i. I fin. t i F f ' I f FEB 2 5 1980 CITY OF DENTON ~ MANAGER'S OFFICE I i I _ rir)ity RWrA0t ,rX1ty of T 5 ar tK Gomel uHlce 0915-FY8l February 26, 1980 ii T he Honorabla James Collins, M, C, 2419 Washington, n0, C, 20515e Building i _ RF: Fiscal Year 1981 Appropriations for Water Resource Protects in the Trinity Basin 11 Dear Congressman Collins: 'I On April 1, 198p, th~~ Authority is scheduled to appear before the Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, Listed below are the points we !gill be covering in our statement and ask that you also support them, 1, TRINITY RIVER PROJECT; The Trinity River Project consists of 'three e ements, ey are Tennessee Colony Lake located in Anderson, k Freestone, Henderson and Navarro Counties; the Dallas Floodway Extension which would extend the present Dallas levees through south Dallas; and the Multiple-purpose Channel for flood control, recreation and na vigatlon from Trinity Bay to Liberty, A. Support the 950 0 $ 0? I in the President's Budget to car;;inue Phase 11 General Design Memorandum, We are advised by the Corps of Engineers that this is an adequate amount of money for these studies, ,I 2, LAKEVIEW RESERVOIR: The Lakeview Reservoir is a flood control, water su pp y and recre it-ion project located Da )as Counties, in southeast Tarrant and southwest 4 Af The Presidents Budget contains $32.5 Million for construction, I The Fort Worth District of the Corps of Engineers have indicated to us that it has a capability of spending $32.5 Million during Fiscal Year 1981 for land ac uisiti banktnent construction. q on, road relocation, and em- 3* WALLISVILLE LAKE: Wallis ille Lake is a saltwater barrier, recreation 8nTwa er supp y project at the mouth of the river in Chambers and Liberty Counties. P P.p, Box 5768 Arlinglon, Texas 76011 (817) Metro•461.3151 r YM~ f y4 45Aa~ L ` V(( N^` ~y~~ y''ffT' ....n. w..•r...n~ i. • I1~j~}'~ff~~(j~e y9tf)~y`1 V.y♦ 41 `nt I r,~d61A ~~{f y~` ~~.f t.' 'f l^~.-11• ~ -y ~.+.rrn'~Tf 1'M '~A1~~~'lll~~~~. 1' i" { 1 I, I. Y the Honorable James Collins, M.C. February Zb, 1980 Page 2 A. No funds are included in the President's Budget and none are needed in FY 19816 i B. Urge the Southwestern Division of the Corps of Engineers to expedite its efforts to complete and submit for evaluation to the Federal courts, all studies required as a, result of the I' environmental lawsuit. This pro3ect is urgently needed for a water siApply source and saltwater barrier in the Lower Trinity Basin and the City of Houston. F 4. AUBREY RESERVOIRS The Aubrey Reservoir is a water supply and re- creation tion prn ect located in Cook and Denton Counties. The Cities of Dallas and Denton serve as the prodect's local sponsor. A. No funds are included in the President's Budget. B. Support the City of Dallas and Denton in their effort to add funding to the President's Budget for the Aubrey Reservoir Project, The Corps of Engineers has the capability to expend $1 Million on the Aubrey Reservoir Project in FY 1981. If we can provide you with more information, please do not hesitate to call. Yours very truly f DANNY F ANCE 'General Manager t DFV:dss 1 i .Mi Y 0915-FY81 February 260 1980 a i The attached letter was sent to the following; s f The Honorable Phil Grairm, M. C. 1609 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D. C. 20515 The Honorable Jack E. Hightower, M. C. 120 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D. C. 20515 The Honorable James C. Wright, Jr., M.C. „ 2459 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D. C. 20515 The Honorable Jack Brooks, M. Co 2449 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D. C. 20515 The Honorable Martin Frost, M. C. 1123 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D, C, 20515 The Honorable Jim Mattox, M. C, 1127 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D. C. 20515 The Honorable Ray Roberts, M. Co 2184 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, 0. C. 20515 The Honorable James Collins, M. C. ' 2419 Rayburn House Office Building f Washington, D C 2 0515 , The Honorable Charles Wilson, M. C. ` 1214 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D. C. 20516 The Honorable Sam B, Hall,,Jr., M. C. 318 Cannon House Office Building -'h Washington, D. C. 20515 The Honorable Lloyd Bentsen, U.S.S. 240 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D. C. 20510 The Honorable John G. Tower, U,S,S, 142 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D. Co 20510 r 1. x•*la~. ~ ° 4` E !i{., : .e~~y kR LITr°R~ r i DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION, CORPS OF ENGINEERS MAIN TOWER BUILDING, 1200 MAIN STREET DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 REPLY TO AYf EN'{ION OF, SWDHD-$R MARK 1980 Mr. Chris Hartung F City Manager { City of Benton ; 215 K. McKinney s Denton, TX 76201 r; r' a t Dear Mr. Hartungt The a-.nual meeting of the Trinity River Basin Water Management Interests Group is scheduled for 22 April 1960 in Dallas, Texas* As we discussed in last { year'a meeting, members were eneuuraged to host future meetings on a voluntary baels. The Dallas Water Utilities has invited the group to hold its 10th n annual meeting at the Dallas City liall. We appreciate Mr. Rice's generous s offer. F~ I We are preparing the agenda for the meeting and would appreciate your sugges- tions for topics to be included. If your organization wou14 like to make a presentation, please include the subject, time required, and the name of the individual who will be making the presentation. We would like to have your comments by 25 March 1980 so we can finalizes an agenda by I. April 1980. We are looking forward to meeting with you again and discussing ideas and problems of interest to the group. Sincerely, 3 R. H. BB HILL, P.B. f Chief, Engineering Division i r p SWULU-XR 1 s Mr. Chris Hartung ' city manager City of Denton 215 E McKin'nsy Denton, TX 76201 Tar rfr. IiirCunKt The annual meeting Of the Trinity River Basin Water Management Tntersets Group to +aGheduled for 22 April 1980 in Dulla6, TOxas. A4 we discueeed in last y r' e meesting$ MemVers were encouraged to host futures meetings on a voluiltary beris~ The Dallas Water Util,itias has invited the group to hold ftO I tiix annual meeting at thet Dalian City }Lail. We Appreciate tor. itic('s genr.rous offer, We am preparing the oaandel far t1le meeting and w=ould appreciate your au,ggee- tions for topics to be included, if your orgouization would like to make a presentations please includo the subjeot, time rraquired, and th* nama of rho individual wteo will be making the presentation. We would like to haves yotAr comments by 25 March 1980 so we can finalize an raganda by 1. April 1980. } Wa are looking forward to rueeeting with you again and diceussir* ideas and pro4lrams of "intareat to the group. Blxecacaly► , y Ii. H. ASRItYNITaG, 1'. k► Chief, Knginaering 01.vioion c' ti , r., 00I1as water utilities City Hall • Dallas, Texas 75277 (214)070-3011 March 27, 1980 Colonel Donald J. Palladino United States Corps of Engineers P. 0. Sox 17300 Fort Worth, TX 76102 E Dear Colonel Palladino: On March 21, 19809 I met with Mr. Fujiwara and his staff to discuss the Aubrey Reservoir draft contracts, The purpose of the meeting was to review the contracts you had forwarded to the Division office and to determine if mutually acceptable language could be agreed upon for those ! provisions still under discussion. In general, I believe we were successful. Your staff represented the Corps well; they also recognized I the legitimate d interests of the project sponsors. needs an I The following-is a summary regarding contract provisions that Dallas submitted -to the Corps of Engineers on February 14 and changes that resulted from the March 21 meeting. The numbers in the tabulation below refer to the Dallas ctmments submitted February 14. WATER SUPPLY CONTRACT Recur.: Purpose was to clarify for all parties the conditions undeee which "future use" would be determined. Your staff recognized the problem of identifying the point at which f "future use would be triggered. However, they p x fer to not address the issue in -the contract. Failure to clarify the question could be cause for future dispute, but we will not object to omission of our requested provision. Re est. 0: Relates to Request #2. Same outcome. Request #15: Purpose was to clarify the treatment of costs associated with sediment resurveys and monumentation. The present draft omits the subject. Mr. Pena has advised that the contract will include sediment resurveys and monumentation costs under the same classification as Major Capital k Replacement Cost (Article 5b). This is acceptable to us. } I, E A city utlllty providing Dallas with water purification and dlstribut{on, waste water collection and traatment Y r Colonel Donald J. Palladino March 27, 1980 }'gage 2 ReCUest #16: In the contract, we agree to pay our part of the O&M cost for the life of the contract. But, there is no provision for us to participate to any degree in decisions for r scheduling such maintenance, or even to give us advance notice for planning and budgeting purposes. We know you must maintain control of the 0&M of this facility, but we also know that hahassdoesotheofederalagovernmentudget constraints just Accordingly, as part of our willingness to pay, we need reasonable access to estimates of future costs and an opportunity to comment thereon. At the meeting we agreed on contract language that will riot affect the Corps responsibilities, but will assure us of the advance information. This is an important and very real need. We hope you, concur. However, if not, we will consider a policy letter providing the same assurance. Request X18: We had requested the standard dispute clause included in earlier contracts. We understand such clauses are now contrary to policy. We will not object to its deletion. Request #19:.. The purpose was to provide a convenient way of adjusting the contract when the flood control benefits included in the project are specifically authc:~~°A r by Congress, We will not object to deletion of the provision, since it can be addressed at the time of aVflh Orczation. i The remaining requests we forwarded February ld were either accepted or are no longer applicable. j RECREATION_ CONTRACT Re uest #1: Purpose is to confirm the agreement reached orally for a. reduction in level of recreation, Your staff is to provide alternate language to accomplish same purpose. The language is to stipulate that the General Design Memorandum would be followed "in concept"; however, specifics, the purchase of 'land, and revisions would be in accordance with the Plan of Recreation Development and Management as provided for in Article 2c. Re uesi: #3 Relates to #1. Alternate language is to be developed consistent, with reques,.. Colonel Donald J. Palladino March 27, 1980 Page 3 Request V. Purpose was to provide a mutually acceptable provision for scheduling future recreation facilities. Agreed that, alternate language is to be developed to stipulate that, future recreation development as provided in this contract shall be contingent upon availability of government funds and shall be in accordance with Article 2c (to be included in Article 3b(2). Regsaest ##8: This request regarding which city funds are being pledged as security for contract payments is critical. Your staff agreed to resubmit the same clause as approved for the water supply contract along with a letter to the Corps of Engineers from the City Attorney of the City of Dallas (Copy of letter attached), Article 4 on page 6 regarding the Construction and Operation of °.dditional Facilities was modified by the Division to provide for 50-50 sharing, As a result of our discussion, the provision is to be limited to facilities constructed by third parties. Therefore, the words "by the City or" are to be stricken because elsewhere in the contract the City is allowed to construct facilities provided for in the plan and to credit the cost toward f its committmentsl Dispute clause deleted, We will not object, Request #12; Request #15: The description of the purposed fees and charges is to be included and made a part of recreation contract, We will not object. The remaining requests we forwarded February 14 were either accepted or a no longer are applicable. i ~ i Colonel Palladino, we appreciate very much the excellent cooperation you and your staff have extended to both Dallas and Denton during these r' negotiations. With these few remaining provisions resolved, we are wall on our way to finalizing the contract. We urge expeditious review of the contract so that it can be finalized this suntmer. { Sincerely, Thomas E. Taylor Assistant Director Water Utilities Department mb Attachment C: Division Engineer th»i s':,Watun.g, City Manager of Denton I . r--^t-,--------..-t-..---7 I'... ..~..~-.-'r _ I~ j t I y ~i i i 1 it i 1 I Ik Y E i APR 01 1300 f. ~ t L•(ri4rl CITY Or 9 MANAGER'S OFf iCk i ; { CITY OF DALLAS March 20, 1980 Colonel Donald Palladino U.S. Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 17300 Ft. Worth, Texas 76102 ' RED: Dallas Charter Provision Ch. XI Sec. 14; Art. 3(e), Recreation Development Contract Dear Colonel Palladino: , You have inquired if Ch. XI Sec. 14 of the Dallas City Charter prohibits " inclusion of proposed Article 3(e) in the recreation contract between the U.S. and the City of Dallas. Proposed Article 3(e) pledges surplus water revenues to repay the debt Incurred for recreation development. The recreation contract is a mandated portion of the Aubrey package, and the entire Aubrey package is the most prudent investment for the City. ' Therefore, it.is_my opinion that Ch. XI Sec. 14 of the Dallas City Charter i does not prohibit inclusion of Article 3(e) in the proposed contract between the United States and the City of Dallas for Recreation Development at Aubrey and Lewisville Lakes, if executed in conjunction with the proposed contract for water storage spaces in Aubrey and Lewisville lakes. Yours truly, ~ i t LEE E. HOLT Cit, Attorney LEH:vmd ~i W 1 OVYYIC! Of TW CITY ATY0AWY CITY HALL DALLAS, TENAS 76501 TELEPHONE 2141670.3510 1 i i MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPNONEl817)'?g2.4b01 AS crrv or 1DENTON, TEX Office of the City Manager i u - r k' April 220 1980 J i i 1 Colonel John Paladino► District ]Engineer U. S. Army Corps of Engineers P, d. Box 17300 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Subject: Aubrey Lake - Drafts of Water Supply and Recreation Contracts with City of Denton r, Dear Colonel Paladino: This letter is submitted as clarification for the letter sent to `s you dated March 31, 1980 by Mr. King Cole. 1. The City of Denton is requesting that the assurance of funds provisions of both contracts (.Article 5, para. a of the i_ Water Storage Contract and Article 3, pars, a of the Recreation Development Contract) be modified to provide for a pledge of surplus revenues from the Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System Fund of the City of Denton. The wording has been provided to j your office by the City of Dallas. the recreation 2. The pledge of Water revenues to pay costs asso0 aced with the Aubrey Reservoir is legitimate and $ appropriate because of the fact that these recreation costs are an integral part of the reservoir project. These costs may be included in the cost of water as part of t':e City's rate structure. 30 The City cannot sign a contract which directly to indirectly pledges future ad valorem tax revenues. our Bond attorneys, the City does noofva the legal authority to make such a pledge for. the repayment Corps project. f 1 Colonel John Paladino April 22, 1980 Page Two Beyond the legal questions of such a pledge, the impact of the tax pledge on the City's future General Obligation Bond debt would be devastating. This pledge would severely cloud the City's capability to issue tax-supported debt for other municipal purposes and might well preclude these programs. For these and other reasons, the City of Denton urges the approval s of the su;:plus revenue pledge mentioned above. P i 44 We feel that the surplus revenue pledge coupled with the commitment to levy rates and charges sufficient to meet all x obligations of the City's water system provides a very strong assurance to the U. S. Government of the City's ability to repay the costs of this project:. The ability of the City Council to adjust water rates to recover actual costs is virtually unlimited by City ordinances or state law. rn this regard, a revenue pledge is actually stronger than a tax pledge because of constitutional limitations on the amount; of ad valorem taxe.. city may levy and because of recently enacted "Truth iri Taxation" legislation which will make it more and more difficult for elected officials in Texas to increcj a property taxes. 5. The City of Denton's request for consideration of these matters was supported-in our previous letter of March 31, 1980 { by various sections of the City's current Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System Revenue Bond ordinance which provides for collection of rates sufficient to generate "net revenues" in excess of the amount required to pay principal and interest on the City's outstanding water system debt and to cover "any other indebtedness" for which the City should become legally liable. This provision is as strong or stronger than a provision which might be included in a City Charter. While a City Charter ` provision may be changed by a vote of the people, this bond ¢ covenant represents a contract between the City of Denton and the boiid holders and cannot be changed as long as any of the system's parity bones are outstanding. i I hope that the information provided is sufficient to clarify the position of the City of Denton on this most important concern relating to the Aubrey contracts. If there is, any further information which is required, please contact me. F i Sincerel , G, C$tun g City Manager k F GCIi: jm k cc: S. Fujiwara I f h 61 '~dA HAND DEI.IVERCD ; CITY OF DALLAS - - April 24, 1980 Colonel Donald J. Palladino U.S. Corps of Engineers P.O. Sox 17300 Ft. Worth, Texas 75102 Re': Inquiries from Corps of Engineers r t Dear Col. Palladino: y I am advised of inquiries concerning: 1. Ch. XI, Sec. 14 of the City Charter is the "sacred fund" clause which essentially prohibits the use of surplus water revenues for purposes other than betterment of the water and sewer system. Now, then, may such revenues be used to se;;ure the recreation contract with the Corps tNf Engineers? It is true that the Charter provision does not allow the use of surplus water revenues for aM park or recreation purpose. However, if the end Lo be a' achieved is betterment of the water system, and the most prudent investment, dollar for dollar, is the selection of a Corps option to build Aubrey with recreation facilities, tihnn the City Charter doe, not prohibit the use of surplus water funds to build lake Aubee . The -recreation expenditure is necessary to insure Zorps partic pat on to achieve this objective in the j most prudent way. I am assuming that the Corps will not rarticlpate without recreation in some form; hnwever, I do not attempt to address or Interpret I F the jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers as promulgated by Congress. This is in accord with and in support of the statement of the City Attorney dated March 20, 1980, in a letter to you. 2. You have inquired as to the "strength" of the water surplus revenue pledge to secure payment of capital costs. The assurance of funds clause } provides all payments shall be secured by a pledge of surplus revenues from the Water Department, Additionally, it is provided that if surplus revenues are not available, then the City must adjust rates to make possible the timely payment of all obligations. This is the same arrangement used by the City of Dallas in all its revenue bond issues. Water surplus revenues are the best security available. s 3. A sinking fund r•om ad valorem taxes to retire the long term debt even though no bonds are issued should be discussed. This is undesirable and not a viable option because: A. Use of a sinking fund is contrary to our Charter provisions. The City Charter requires (Ch. XI, Sec. 4) that there shall be no transfer of Of114E Of THE C1TY ATTORNEY CITY PIALL DALLAS. TEAS 76201 TELEPHONE 21b670.36W ` 4 Colonel Donald J. Palladino April 24, 1980 Page Two r _ unincumbered revenues of any non-tax supported public utility to any other purpose, The intent of this section and the "sacred fund" section' is to isolate the Water Department, make it an individual entity, dcvendent u on itself for all expenditures. The Water Utilities uses no ad vafnre~r tax p revenues. Tts operation is supported by revenues, Use of a sinkinst fund 6 tablished from ad valorem taxes appears to be contrary to these Charter . provisions. Use of a sinking fund changes the nature of the debt to a general obligation and must be counted in ascertaining the City's debt limA imposed by the State Constitution. I hope this discussion answers your questions. If I may be of additional assistance please advise. I Sincerely, 444~ MICHAEL L. MAY Assistant City Attorney MIX. wmd } S L I t i s r i I i i DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FORT WORTH DISTRICT. CORPS OV ENGINEERS P. O. BOX 17300 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 w REPLY TO ATTENTION Ori 2 5 APR 1990 ~4iI''bST}~Pk 1~ )r' i 1`!r. '1v'hgluaa 'd`uylur' 1)ire.otar. , t?allso Hntsas" Util'd,t;t.asa~ 4A, XorCho City 110:}.•x. l)atl3usaa 7'cnra 9,5277 i. Po ar Mr.:t'aylarl x'hra 1ynrt; 14orth I)i0trlet, Clit Army Ct)rpm of >`;ata{inooira Liao ,ducat cAosud the public revistti pex-.tod for tho Aur mz l,taka evaluation rllg knL i:o C4NUj) i with Sootiou 404(b)(1) of tiara Clawk Water Aot. One 01 tho romimate recoiyod come from the 'ils v:issh gild 'AiWAN 80'rvine (l)aavi 3) and gove- cemad heir yre•vio)as xagglmaeucllaa;io~, that theice bet o ni,vilmsml continuous va;b.ae" of wat or from Aubrey take. 1. Our U110 iudilcaco U%at we have boosi wori nv, with Ua.lUs Waator t)k1lt i:i+ (SiHU) since f1CtAb91' of 1974 to establiali #a wastor reiegoo z4ho/.tU16 for this vrojec:t, VI& M40 lmttor d*ted Apxfl t, t.97$p refit stud t% utvgestacl vat<er rtalclmme 1;agtmemn. By letter lotted ` Jima 161' 1016, tho T axaam VArks aura WilldlIfe. Dopar"ttiant (T'k6Jt7) match 46fi,nitite tt~v+aos ul3ttdatlASl.1i for tlto htabutay 1.1aise water ralease rogiwtanM A aob)y of tldo :utter wnsg furniahed to the olty of Dall.aca nad ti)e olty of veniem i, Anro roectutl.y, by letter dated Vocwuzber 10, 1979p 010 a41U indicai:ed wi,ll.ingswaw, 0 d'irscuss with the TM)P tim a01,arteaaaiti.as for coordinated rw:b z%Asav for (siwlaata•omm ae, untie ocaaylatom prooorv avicn. 11ow to Lbe tims to aaalavdoime ksuKtous3 dimetma.lons with both Che 1 W1' O amt Coati 'i'kl)1) about that Aub:loct water vilearoo and mxT- ,e at a )atttuatlly ak,raoabla ragiman. Uil UVO t.0 Q01FA l4tIWAtC1 01161 S" Aaraaatuffit Will lr N01y 0416y ax' gsc>v,tnahalat►t.ll► block u0notruccion of the project. Titm USAIl; Stara tal.raaaidy eexl>rGA"d a wi3.X:ttrp*9a to mfor tlau pvoja ct vnoljor Pa-et !.504 of 40 011 as belaag a nviromosttas,lly uraw.1nifuatury tt iese the "elkedulp. iu csat oblishe%do `Clturaforo, tho satiof'ylug of thi.a ra:lluiro1,m)t to just no iratronaot ou conouaarzust ikg tho vat r mupply and recratitioi1 vontr alto on Aubxey Lat eb - - i 8 5 APR 1988 ;E V f;Wlf'~1•-1'kt biro ,oaldxr ii. Taylor rarznspnzxia~ces n tliia raaat.tdx cs ~ lat a we la~rraa tvac?a+aad "t of sa for your int'dxaation dash uduo wa aluo stamd rOQ4y to "olat you au your Utwoussioas vitU the USl+ o and the FEUD A airrivIns at an a8red" ahla y0,6480 schadular we hava I afaanued the city of i?enton of this mattor by aaPY Of this °lhdy Ua>y r~itab, to be as party to tile diocuwaion ~ l.Att~tx' auaei its i.Nt~.oacuxh . ` and/pr any raO~x KrE raucftud. 04 r Any quastioltY you Might, have about thin ahould be diraatod to ktto, James C. ChaudIsr at 817/334.2093* Sincerely, ` _ iracl '44 autlDd Colonel* C' 0i»t>`i`G1; ~Yd1~~!l~fi7C F eai Xu~rnis4~da a, 1 3 P,j6 & wildlifo Garvice wo iucl 819 "Saylor stroot 76102 life Dept* wo irncl xWZAS P660 & Wild Jo u No A'"VM building 78703. Da',Laa (:UX t3MuPr wo final City liaw R, DAllast To%" 75277 Hstarable Jos, Y.tchal.l w IAa.l Mayor Of Dontwa CITY OF DENTON 215 go Mc>~:UMY MANAGER'S JFf lCE V D*utout Twwa 76201 t f y IN RCPLY REFER 10: UNITED STATES E)EPARTMENT OF THE INTSRIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Ecological Services 9A33 Fritz Lanham Building 819 Taylor street !'or; Worth$ Texas 76102 April 7, 1980 Colonel Donald J. Palladino District Engineer Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army P.Q. Box 17300 a" Fort Worth, Texas 76102 r Attn: SWFED-OR Dear Colonel Palladino: This letter responds to your revised public notice, dated March 13, y 1980, regarding the placement of fill material at River Mile 6 p0 of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, Texas. work sed Is the construction of Aubrey Dam and Reservoirp an authorized Corps of Engineers' project within the Trinity River Basin, The following comments are submitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife0urocomna- tion Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 661 et. seq.). meats have been coordinated with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, i which will be providing a separate.response on this notice. E ' The Service has two mejjr concerns which should be resolved prior t4 the Corps of Engineers initiating the proposed action. These concerns are: specified below for your consideration. ~.an~ cquisition ' } The services May 14, 1975, report and subsequent correspondence on the proposed project recommended the }•urchase of approximately 2,605 acres of project lands in fee simple in lieu of easement. The Service believes ' i these lands are of substantial value for fish and wildlife resources i i and potential outdoor recreation and has, therefore, requested their , purchase pursuant to the 1962 Joint Reservoir Land Acquisition Policy between the Departments of Interior and Army. . Tha Fort Worth District's latest correspondence on this matter, dated March 10, 1978, indicates However, jtheiOfficeoofftheaChiefiofon of these lands will be required. Engineers, by letter of May 30, 1979, to the Director of the U.S. .ish and Wildlife Service, has indicated that joint land acquisition action on Aubrey will be taken when the project enters the construction phase. r i xt is our position that the conversion of easement lands to fee simple at the Aubrey Reservoir Project is essential for the mitigation of project impacts and the protection of fish and wildlife resources from adverse, secondary development. We request that the Corps of Engineers cooperate with the Service during project planning in determining the current status of project easement lands and their capability for mitigating project-related impacts to fish and wildlife resources. J Instream Flows " i The Fish and Wildlife Service's report of May 14, 1975, further re- commended a minimum continuous release of water from Aubrey Reservoir. Guidelines established by the Administrator of the Environmental Pro- { tection Agency (40 CFR 230) specify the values of wetlands and aquatic C habitats for fish and wildlife and prescribe measures to be followed in 'minimizing adverse impacts during the placement of fill materials. Placement of an embankment across the Elm Fork's floodplain will directly result is the elimination of 90 miles of.shallow, productive stream f habitat and will indirectly impact about 10 miles of stream below the structure through alterations in stream hydrology and sedimentation rates, as described in the Administrator's guidelines. A minimum release of water from the proposed structure is required to maintain suitable hydrologic conditions within the Elm Fork and mitigate losses of stream and wetland habitat arising from impoundment. A recent exchange of correspondence between the SouthwisLern Division. Engineer and our Regional Director, affirms the Corps of Engineers' I desire for improving low flow conditions downstream from Corps reservoir projects. Therefore, we request that the Corps of Engineers initiate discussions with the local project sponsors, the Cities of Dallas and Denton, to determine an operational release schedule mutually acceptable to all concerned parties. This operational schedule should meet the downstream water supply requirements of the project sponsors as well as _ maintain the ecological and recreational benefits attributable to ade- quate stream flows between the proposed Aubrey Dam and Lewisville Reservoir.. In summary, we believe this proposed activity will be acceptable only if the following measures are adequately considered for fish and wildlife protection3 1. Project lands determined to be of substantial, value for the protection or enhancement of fish and wildlife resources, or for public outdoor recreation, be purchased in fee simple in lieu of easement. 2. Minimum continuous stream flows, as mutually determined by the Corps of Engineers, local project sponsors, and the Fish and Wildlife i . 10 r Service, be maintained for the protection of fish, wildlife, and recreational resour'Les between Aubrey Dam and the headwaters of Lewisville Reservoir. The opportunity to comment on this notice is appreciated. Please advise us of your action on our recommendations. Sincerely, Jerome L. Johnson Field Supervisor eel RD, FWS, Albu. NM (ES) " AM, FWS, Ac~3tin, Tx. (ES) TPWD, Austin, Tx. r 1 i 1 1 I { f dabs water utilities City Hall • Dallas, Texas 75277 • 12141670-3011 December 20, 1979 Mr. Charles D. Travis Executive Director Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road , ' Austin, TX 78744 j Dear Mr. Travis: Your letter of December 3 to Camille Cates expressing continued interest in.the Aubrey Project is appreciated. We look forward to working with you on this project and provide the following information in response to f your letter, The Financial and Economic Feasibility Study being conducted by consultants is expected to be completed by mid-January. In the meantime, we are continuing our discussions with the Corps of Engineers to update cost, to. refine project options, and to discuss possible contract terms. The Corps of Engineers current estimated cost for the Aubrey Project is $226,000,000, Of this amount the local share is estimated at o1599000,0009 including an estimated $16,500,000 for local participation in recreation facilities. These amounts are predicated on the 1973 Aubrey Lake Design Memorandum. i In reviewing contract terms, we were reminded that one of the first activities that must take place under a Corps of Engineers contract is the preparation of a "plan of Recreation Development and Management". For the Aubrey Project, I expect the local sponsors will manage the preparation of that master plan. We look forward to working closely with you to define more precisely the scope and character of recreational development appropriate to'this regional facility. Also, we solicit your interest in managing the surface area of Lake Aubrey. The water surface comprises approximately 30,000 acres. It would appear that the 'p water surface could best be controlled and supervised by your agency in conjunction with operation of the proposed state park. A 0yutlllty providing Dallas with water purification and distribution, waste water collection and treatment k s Mr, Charles D. Trav f•~, December 20, 1979 Page 2 Thank you for a copy of the recommendations regarding lake releases. As you know, the Aubrey Project contemplates the use of the stream bed for conveying the water downstream. Accordingly, we will be glad to discuss with you the opportunities for coordinated releases consistent with water supply needs. Please let me know if we cal provide further information pending the completion of the feasibility study, or if It would be timely to initiate =".discussions regarding recreation development. Also, at your earliest convenience, I would appreciate your confirming the Departments intention j to proceed with a major state park in conjunction with Aubrey, if the local sponsors proceed with the project. Sincerely, I Thomas E. Taylor 1 Assistant Director r k C: Chris Hartung, City Manager City of Denton Camille Cates 'Assistant to the City Manager City of Dallas Jack Robinson, Director Park and Recreation Department City of Dallas Corps of Engineer i Ft. Worth District j i i I M I Ii 10 ~ i. .I Olt PARK yAND WILDLIFE DEPAFV) MENT fOMMISS10NER5 COMMISSIONERS '.1 V~il PERRY R.8ASS JOE 9. FULTON Chol men, Fort Worth 111 Lubbock } JAMES'R.PAXTON EDWIN L. COX, JR. Vk*Chairman, PalentiM Dallas ' CHARLES D. TRAVIS PEARCEXHNSON ' EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR W,Ia,OS80RN,JR. Aurtin 42W Smith School Road >Eanbe ENna Aunln,Texas 78744 December 3, 1979 i Ms. Camille Cates Assistant to,the City Manager Office of the City Manager City Hall Dallas, Texas 75201 j Dear Ms. Cates: I , Thank you for your letter of November 16, 1979, regarding the Aubrey Reservoir Project. As we discussed, the Department is interested in this project and looks forward to the findings and resolutions of your studies to be completed in December. In the meantime, I would be interested-in seeing a time frame of your planning schedule and updated cost,eatimates for the Aubrey Project. As promised in our meeting of November 13, 1979, please find attached j the --,rtmentts recommendations regarding Aubrey Lake Releases. it is noted that the recommendations regarding releases provided here are based on the project as originally planned and should the scope of the project change, the recommendations may need to be adjusted. I Yn reference to your inquiries about contacts with the U,S. Fish and Wildlife Service please be advised that Jerome L. Johnson in Fort Worth should be of assistance regarding the Aubrey project. f f Jerome L. Johnson Field Supervisor USFWS I 9A33 Fritz Lanham Bldg. $19 Taylor Street I Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Phone: AC8171334-2961 r ' 1 1 , 4 f i ' 4 i f f k i l' ( i Ms. Camille Cates • Page Two December 3, 1979 to coordinate with you on this The Department appreciates the Opportunity ro ect and would be happy to discuss it i~tgrYagressesail should you de- sire, Please keep us advised as the proje p . t Since ly, , CH,ES D, TRAVIS Executive Director l CVT;3TR:plf Attachment 4 ect Mr. Chris Hartung Mr. Thomas E. Taylor P.E. . Sam Garrett I , j I f F 7 TRW PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT RECOMMEND4TIONS FOR AUBREX LAKE RELEASES., OCTOBER, 1976 Some controversy apparently still exists in regard to the firm yield of Aubrey Lake. It is our understanding that this controversy stems from prior water rights for Lewisville Lake,.which are in excess of its firm A yield,'and over systems management with Aubrey Lake, As the construction agency, the Corps of Engineers calculated the firm yield of Aubrey Lake ' to be 152 cubic feet/second (98,088,184 gallons/day) under 1985 conditions and 3.39 cubic feet/second (89,838,063 gallons/day) under 2085 conditions. These are the firm yield figures in the authorization document submitted i to Congress by the Corps of Engineers and found acceptable to the City of Denton and the Texas Water Rights Commission. The recommendation by this 1 Department for a 15 cubic feet/second continuous base, flow as well as for x variable seasonal flow regime of 15 cubic feet/second from December 1 - i February 14, 140 cubic feet/second from February 15 - May 31, and 25 cubic c feet/second from June 1 - November 30 would require considerably less water than the firm yield of Aubrey Lake. A continuous flow of 140 cubic feet/ second, recommended by this Department es desirable, would be only 1 cubic foot/second higher than the firm yield under projected 20A5 conditions but ' could probably be provided in most years up until that time. The expected occurrence of spills from Aubrey Dam and the period of highest water use F ! ` ~ - by Dallas and Denton coincide with the period when higher continuous flows I` are desirable for fish spawning and recreation. i r , 1 I • 6 I PARKS GNU WILDLIFE DEPAR TNT Ott o, COMMISSIONERS • 1NMISaIONltns • BOBAUHLEbON y } ; T~mpia F w 1RCE JOHNSON :h0mon, Austin JOHgNj m, GntEEN ' 1K.FULTON LOUIS H,SYUMBEFIG !ka-Chairma man, Lubbock , CLAYTON TO GARRISON San Antonio :K R. STONE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR calls JOHN H. REAGAN BUILDING AUSTIN, TEXAS .78701 If June 17, 1976 Colonel Joe H. Sheard, District Engineer .i . U. Army Corps of Engineers I post Office Box 17300 ' 3 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Dear Colonel Sheard: t has previously stated our interesost The Texas Parks and Wildlife Departmen release patterns from the proped ,i to the Corps of Engineers concerning flow I Aubrey Reservoir. Our recommendations are as follows: base flow of 15 cfs should be passed through A continuous unallocated b ! the Aubrey Dam. Lake should b e . water in Aubrey :release b. Utiliza:...,n of conservation storage of such water into Lewisville Lake and accomplished through subsequent withdrawal front Lewisville. 1 downstream demands c. Release of conservation storage= vide continuous flow in the Elm i provide should be programmed so as to ' the headwaters of Lewisville Lake: rather fork between Aut:°ey Dam and than slug f:owe. i should be a minimum of 15 cfe from December 1- de Continuous releases a February 14, 140 efs.from February 15 - May 31, and 25 cfs from isms. June 1 - November 30 for thePl4~ecs preservation theaentire yearnwould be continuous minimum re tease of ; highly•desirable for .isheries. w ' ril through September, water e, During the prime recreation season, Ap releases of sufficient intensity and durationwshoulds.a made on as on A water regular a basis as possible, particularly l; release of approximately 50-150 efs would provide a desirable flow from 150 for most canoeists. Flows -500 elimitufshiag~abhihermflowa experienced canoeists but would severely , I mould probably be detrimental to recreation. Colonel Joe H. Sheard, District Engineer June 17, 1976 Page Two . These recowm endations received the concurrence of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife service anc he Bureau of outdoor Recreation. that The Draft Master Plan for Aubrey ofkconservation storage wate8)wouldcbeeresolved { the operational. plan for release ? after the legal aspects of water releases are resolved. It now appears that the Texas Water Rights Commission will issue a permit for the Aubrey Lake and E Lewisville Lake enlargement projects which will only specify the conrvation storage capacities allotted to Dallas and Denton and will set the maximum race Dam of diversion by Denton. l have to be included management 1 i and Lewisville Lake ke the Corps of Engineers,'Dallas'and Denton which must binsibmitterat the Texas Water Rights Commission for approval. recommendations in the operating agreement would be appreciated. k ~ LE The stated purposes of the Aubrey Lake project are kater supply, recreation, and fioh and wildlife, and 49% of the project benefits are attributable tWildlifo ' recreation and fish and wildlife. Under the provisions Coordination Act, equal consideration must be given to fish and wildlife resources.. We feel that the recommendations we have offered will maximize fishery and recreational benefits while not interfering with water supply Management. Information provided to this Department indicates that both Dallas and Denton transfer f; intend to release conservation storage water from the Aubrey DaThenconservation r) it via the Elm Fork Aubrey Lake take Yield for Aubrey ' ' storage capacity Y Lake Lake and Lewisville bake is as follows: Initial Ultimate (2085] 152 cfs 139 cfs Aubrey cfs Lewisville (modified) 1„23 cfs 113 113 275 cfs 252 cfs Total 134 cfs Lewisville (existing) 149 cfs 71 cfs Added by Aubrey 126 cfs For the project life, the average annual increase in yield attributed to Aubrey i Lake is 121.5 cfs. ire Providing a continuous base flow of 15 efsfromtheexec Aubrey Dam would r equeasonal 10,859 acre feet of water per year. Providing in the first paragraph on the flow regime contained in Recommendation "d", proceeding page, would require an average discharge rate of 57 cfs and 101,357 4 acre feet of water per year. This is well below the firm yield of Aubrey Lake, t and the highest flow rate is requested in the season of greatest raiinfaall. The ion request by recommended entoon.arWewfQelbeveryteffortishouldtbeomadevtosaccommodate this ent f Dallas and D i L - 1 Colonel Joe IT, 'heard', District Engineer. June 17, 19,: Page Three regime rather than transferring water strictly by slug flows. The flows as reque.sted do not constitute a consumptive use of water but merely involve the manner of transfer for diversion by Dallas and Denton from Lewisville Lake. A continuous flow of 140 cfs is slightly greater than the firm yivId of Aubrey J :..f Lake but probably could be accomplished through management of flood water releases. Operation of Aubrey and Lewisville Lakes in a coordinated system should make it possible to extend the release period of flood flows for, this purpose. e We would be happy to discuss this matter further with all interested parties. Your cooperation would be appreciated, sin 'r 1? XI "GA ISON ~i hate gut ve Dir~ctor i G: :pm flr U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Worth, Texas City of Dallas 4 1 City of Denton I t i 111 f,1 ' ,I k I' . 9 I „ ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP ACTION TO e4 IXITIALX CI RCVIAM DAN 0001090A TJON 3 INITIALS /ILC j sATL ,M 70 RMATlOX ! t 7 7X1 ilALS X07L AND 1 RLIVRX OATS ►LR CON VRRYATION INITIALS PLC ML OATC aIaY,ATVAL +,'I r REMARKS mamt i4o 3 j t~4I 414L 4,,+~- ffv -Z, III 1 . ' Do NOT use this form as a ` RECORD of appro7al6, concurrences, 3 1~ R0 disapptovals, Clearances, and similar actions. yy ~ ' ROM J. L. JOHNSON aaTR Ass" Cl, rngr Dip 9N9N a 0pT10NAL,FORM 41 Au*US? 1967 S01t-IOt -0! ~ ,j~7+ I itA ~rMA# 1 sICM#1 t0o•t1.30a f , e r• h Ii h i ~I . t Xre Garrett/trot/2212 ` 9 April 1975 ' Mr, kensy 3. Craeaer Director i Dallas 'Water Utilities 500 S. L,rvay Street D~l3as, Toxes 75201 II Dear Mr. Graoseri , Thou* you for your latter of 2 April 3.375 re;nrdinp yct.r `+riews toward prow I vidi.ng ai contiouous rulenae of enter frora Aubrey Lets to Lewisville Lake so as to create and rsaintaln a high quality strean fishery, it is necessary that ve have a prelir.inary indication of your concept for the operation of tho enter supply reloose from AtL)rey Lake to Lewisville Lace, LYth this relecss xehodule, wo can avalitat:e its inpact on they dawn II stream ecosyotem and thou dettimire if s r.odification of the schadtdo vould as beneficial, It is poasible that 5aur planned ralesse schedule Will ecimeide with the eowttotream needs. Your roaponse is requested at the earliest possiblo date. Sincerelq yours, >SAIi. S'1F'Lb-P rr.; Colonel, CL District Lnrineer LTG TRACY Sw- M SUARD S;. MAIL 1 RETURN 3hv Res sec $ Oil b Gay L1, - u s.•...,p....+L.1..i.w:. •.-'w.;~+ti.-. _.w u. t.._ i.. .~...-...a•.~:- .:i ~-•i L2 ~4 y' ti . y L i I I 1 I • f fyih / l~ . ~Y1►1~ r V1111tigs 500 S. Ervay Dallas, Texas 75277 - {2141 74&-9711 Wil 2, 1975 Cblonel Joe H. Sheard, District Erxiineer F`t. Fbrth District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Me Box 17300 Ft. Worth, Texas 76102 ' Dear Colonel Sheard: You trarmlitted a copy of a letter fmm the U. s. Wildlife Service dated September 4, 1974, regarding DePartmnt the p ss iof the Interior, Fish and continuous release from Aubrey Lake so as tvid the habitat bitat or of insuring a the reach of the river between Aubrey Dantandthejupp ha for stream fishing The upper end of Lewisville Lake. The obvious source for supply for sLrll continuous relwses would be the storm and flood Wtelu°t1 impounded In the flood control pool or in the water supply pool, with the far- ther possibility that lose flags or dry weather flows may be ordered by the Texas water Rights Calmission to be passed through Aubrey lake in order to satisfy rights of prior I I clown stream appropriators. Since the source of revenues to satisfy the financial burden of the local cooperators with respect to water supply costs must be derived from sales of water, it follows that water supply considerations should be the det the water conservation ~g factor in ordering releases from txxr pool at Aubrey Lake UMiethemmorse s,6'>id'be"'bdst~able ~ l axtsSVer""` e~t»'r~ael ~t~ 1.101.9•t',el~aseyfront~sAttbre~+►.Ea1C~ga~~.'~G~. ~3~"1.t~..U~-~l~c'ii~@1E'At~~?~1~tI►+Z,~Ze~.h@"~Ctt<ti'@*st1?rAC~Yp ,bey'.eluctant,.to, guarantee-such. a-release -from -the water, supply ing,..Glrought.years,..,urdess there.could be.an arrangelent whereby the .pv 4t4g4oc ernlneazt t~uld Fit-icipate: in project costs attributed -to-water-'supply, As you know, it. is the intention of the City of Dallas to exercise its right to defer water supply payments by deferring water supply withdrawals frcm Aubrey Lake. If a program of continmuss releases can be worked out,'~we would t-rant-to'be assured. thaw reeases•to provide, continuou -the s flow would riot constitute an act on the part of the: Cif #&Dallas.which would. pz It should be recognized that there is a multiplicity of rights to waters of the Elm Fork Trinity River. Any agreement to a continuous release of water frcm Aubrey Lake llt, wuld necessarily involve the City of Denton. AS is evident from the for ego.i-ry, there are many unresolved it;sloes but these should rot be taken necessarily as a bar to the concept of a continuous release for, purposes of fish and wildlife. One factor which needs to be deterrunod is the`'minimtan. chtinususta release,.tbatwould>be tq.9,,, * r .~ssar~,►ar~1,~">r'p-u;Id' wildlife -~Prts?sY 'I ___Acity utillty crovidino Dallas with water ourlfication and t;istrlbutiom, waste water collection and treat.-,rant I M Olt" I,. ,Anel 'Joe H. d -2•- April 2, 1975 rousts. imident to providing, ot)titi ivxvs••releasoo. I an of the opinion that further 1, s stt* urid dismssion of this rzoblea is warranted and will await your suggestions. r ! ! w Very truly yours, 1 i i r E E C,i•t ~ ~ ?(fG• , i m l J ur ems' i afreator i Dallas Y;aE.ter Utilities I SIi3sn~i t=ge ' cc, Mar. Dan Petty • W. James W. Wilson (W/copy of 9/4./74 letter) it ~ 1 ld,l, u 1 r dallas utilities 400 5, Ervay • Dallas, Texas 75277 • (214) 748.9711 April 2, 1975 Colonel Joe H, Sheard, District Engineer Ft, Wrth District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 17300 Ft. Wor'th► Texas 75102 Lear Colonel Sheard: Xc,:t transmitted a'cvpy of a letter from the tJ, S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife ,Sen ice dated 5eptenber 9, 19740 regarding the possibility of insuring a continuous release from Aubrey Lake so as to provide a habitat for stream fishing in the reach of the river between Aubrey Dam and the upper end of Lewisville Lake. The f obvious source for supply for such continuous releases would be the storm and flood waters impounded in the flood control pool or in the water supply pool, with the fur- then possibility that low flows or dry weather flaws may be ordered by the Texas Water Rights Comd.ssion to be passed through Aubrey Lake in order to satisfy rights of prior down stream appropriators. Since the source of revenues to satisfy the financial burden of the local cooperators with respect to water supply costs rust be derived from gales of water, it follows that water supply considerations should be the determining factor in ordering releases £om the water conservation pool at Aubrey Lake. Mether or not the contents of the flood control pool could be used as a source of continuous flows is a question which you ' would be best able to answer. In years of plentiful water supply, I see no reason why it would not be possible to provide a continuous release from Aubrey Lake, at least to that point in time when the City of Dallas elects to utilize the future storage in Aubrey Lake. I would be reluctant to guarantee such a release from the water supply impoundments during drought years, unless there could be an arrarCe ment whereby the federal goverrunent would participate in project costs attributed to water supply. As you know, it is the intention of the City of Dallas to exercise its right to defer water supply payments by deferring water supply withdrawals firm Aubrey Lake. If a i j p=ogrom of continuous releases can be worked out, we would want to be assured that releases to provide continuous flow would not constitute an act on the part of the City of Dallas which would negate the deferment provisions from the water supply contract. G It should be recognized that there is a multiplicity of rights to waters of the Elm Fork 't'rinity River, Any agreemr:nt to a continuous release of water from & brey Lake would necessarily involve the City of Denton. As is evident from the foregoing, there are many unresolved issues but these should not be taken necessarily as a bar to the concept of a continuous release for purposes of fish and wildlife. One factor which needs to be determined is the minimml quantity of continuous release that would be necessary in order to serve fish and wildlife purposes. lection Acity utility providing Dallas with water purification and distribution, waste water col and treatment •.~00 • April 2, 1975 Mmrd -2- 0010 nol Jae S s bo share in the t1 r factor %,ould be the willingness of the federal governwnt incident to providing oonti releases. I am of the opitsion that further its ;1uous bleu is warranted and will await your suggestions. 6i and discussion of this pro Very truly yours? /Director / Dallas p ter Utilities ~7GaL~ Oct t'~ Petty a . Janes W. Wilson (W/oa1y of 9/4/74 letter) E i ~y h' 00 ,~V4~~ } ~ P Mr. Oarrett/pip/2212 a SWPED-PR I April 1975 Mr. Henry J. Greeter Director s I Dallas Water Utilities 1 500 S. Ervay 1 D41].as, TX 75201 Dear We Graesarn BY letter of 9 October 19141 we requested a preliminary indication of your concept for the operation of the water supply releases from Aubrey Lakin to LeW3sville Lake. This information was nrcansary in order to respond to a letter from the U. S. Fish and wildlife l+ervice. To date, however, we !lava received no response. Subsequently, we have received a similar requast from the Office of the f ? Secretary, Southwest Region, U. S. Department of the Ynttrrior, an i d x ovs 3aforraal requests from the t1. S. Fish and Wiidlifa Service and the Te Texas Parka and Wildlife Department. I This is 4A iasportant question and we need your he l to 4AV1 ronunentsl p answer it. 'Ch, . impact statement will not be adequate without this infoz: Lion. Your response is requested at the earliest possible date. Sincerely yours BALLS 1 _p j GORDON A. WALHOOD WALHOOD Chief, En;ineering Division ' I RET TO ! I ENV RES SEC OIL & GAS BLDG r s y r I . poll l }'fe. J±.."M:.s.'•KWP.w,VrnwwY+r.,.~....•. h 10 Mr,, Garratt/vvt/2212 Shi'AtZwl?it 9 October 1974 Mrs Henry J. Gneser Director ` y Dallas Hater Utilities, 5W so Rryky • Dallam, Texas 75201 sear 11r. Creasers Inclosed in a copy of a latter from Hr. John Gd Dogania Viold Supervisoro ~ U.g. Fish and Wildlife Sorricso requesting a water release scliedule for the f ubtwy Lake pro jest. TA order to respond to this letter, we geed a nrolininary indication of Your concept for the oNration of the cater mmrily releasm from Aubrey Lake to Levrieville Lake. 'a ?•',r Your raapomse is requested at the earliest possible dAte. t sirweruly youraa `1 A anal c,~aa l~l:ooa As stated Chief, Lnginearing Division 6NFW-1? } l r; VALHOM S%TM '1 )FA1CS. RM~T TO Env Res Sec, I , Oil Q Gas ald7 ~ ~ -..i 1 I ,'.IA.i.xb~~.a.4..Y~•.1~.►.r.L'J.~t~::r!-•wi:MJito.f.w'k.... .t1~w rL"'}+l..hw- 'a.W . f 1.1: Y. 'y_ .4 ..~t ~ /I r I .i ! .tip N . • I r'= UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE >~iStBAldxmf'x.8Rk2fi~ci'#5c~d~i3~11ti~txr~Ili3r~c{c?1~t~ Division of T,?rcr Darn Mudlos OA33 Fritz Lanham Building, 819 Taylor Strom Fort W.orlh, Toxag Z6102 i , ` September 4, 1974 i Colonel Joe H. Sheard District Engineer, Fort Worth District Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army P. 0. Sox 17300 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 i Dear Col. Sheard. In response to Mr. Gordon Walhood's letter of August 16, 19749 9 w ~ we have initiated a restudy of the Aubrey project, It is our understanding that project modifications being considered by the Corps consists of maximizing the storage capacity of the I i4 reservoir thus resulting in an increase in surface acreage of the conservation pool from 25,200 to 29,350 acres. YALrc% of our analysis of the modified project's impact on fish ' and wildlife resources will parallel that which is contained in l.jl. the August 31, 1973, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife's Report (now Fish and Wildlife Service) for the authorized Aubrey Lake. In thin regard our study efforts will necessitate little additional project information other than that which we presently f have available. Otte specific problem area which was not resolved to our satisfaction through previous project planning and coordination efforts and to which we will be focusing greater attention during the course i)f this restudy involves the development of a water release schedule which would provide for continuous stream flow in the Elm Fork between the proposed Aubrey .Damsite and the headwaters of Lewisville :Reservoir. The location of Aubrey Lake approximately 10 river miles above the headwaters of Lewisville Reservoir, coupled with the ` joint operation of the two projects for water supply, will provide a tremendous opportunity for the development of a stream fishery in a geographic area where there is a dearth of such habitat, The extent to which this opportunity will become a reality will de- pend upon the scheduled release of waxer in a manner which provides for maintenance of continuous flows in the stream. /.;f Ili i f • r 2. We solicit your support in the development and implementation of A continuous release schedule as an integral component of this multiple-purpose water development project. In further- " Ance of our efforts to develop biologically sufficient minimum flow requirements which are within the capability of the yield 3 of the reservoir, we request that you provide the following -pertinent project related informations 1.. The projected effect which the reservoir will have on flood flow intensity, frequency, and duration, The quantity of reservoir storage which will be released r •j via the natural river chanv.al for the satisfaction of downstream needs, (This information should be based upon l' projection of "point in time" utilization demands which will be placed upon the yield of the reservoir as well as on an assumption of complete yield utilization. We suggest that figures be provided fo- 10-year intervals of demand from project inception until full utilization is actually ach±.oved), The monthly distribution of total water consu+.aption for II~ the area to be served by the reservoir. (This information k t', should be provided for the driests wettest, and average E '1 year of record). ' 4. The quantity of storage apace to be allocated to sediment } { storage and a definition of Corps authority to release grater stored in the sediment pool prior to full sedimen- tation. 5. The minimum channel capacity of the Elm Fork between the proposed Aubrey damsite and the headwaters of Lewisville ;Y Reservoir, ~rrr:•~ b.. A delineation of those floodplain areas in which flowage easements may be required. The streambed elevation at the Aubrey damsite has been . ' ~~1'b. nAfiatir«.t+~..a.rt...r,..e. ,..Vr•ny...4... i 3. shown as 534 fee: msl in previous corps documents. Is this figure still considered accurate? 6. The Aubrey Lake Design Memorandum No, 1, Hydrology, re- commends that the channel capacity between the two lakes should be capable of handling a discharge of 12,000 cfs j and the operating discharge of floodwaters be at the rate of 8,000 cfs. The existing channel capacity has taus far been assumed by the Corps to be 8,000 cfs. ! Based upon project flood conditions where floodwaters are being held in the floodpool of Lewisville Lake to { elevation 532 and likewise floodwaters are being held in the floodpool of Aubrey Lake to elevation 640.5, what will be the maximum discharge which can be released from Aubrey without causing flooding of nonproject floodplain lands and how long will it take to completely empty the floodpool? Your consideration in this matter of mutual concern is appreciated. E I ~ ` Sincerely yours, !a' I J . John G. Degani Field Supervisor IL1 1111 I . . I ' . E .4 I '1r I f 1 ftlM water utilms [ City Hall • Dallas, Texas 76277 • (214)870-3011 L March 5, 1980 Iy y Mr. Harvey Davis, Director Texas Department of Water Resources 1700 M. Congress Avenue P. 0. Box 13087 Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711 i Dear Harvey: Thank you for the opportunity last November to discuss with you the Aubrey Project and the special study we are making to more thoroughly define our service area and conditions of service. I want to take this s opportunity to advise you of recent activity in both areas. The Cities of Dallas and Denton retained the consulting firm of LW N to conduct a Financial Feasibility Study of Aubrey Reservoir. The study indicates that Aubrey Reservoir should be the next water supply source for Dallas and Denton. Recently, both Cities authorized t1+/.~ir City ' Managers to execute contracts with the Corps of Engineers ,o proceed with the construction of Aubrey Reservoir. Attached is a copy of the LWFW report. On February 14, Dallas and Denton provided comments to the Corps regarding contracts for water supply and recreation. Their review procedure is expected to take three to four months. Therefore, signing of final contracts is not expected until this summer. Federal budget hearings (Fiscal Year 81) began in February. The decision by Dallas and Denton came after the Federal budget for FY 81 was prepared; i therefore, additional funding for Aubrey was not included in the Administration budget, However, the Corps has the capability to begin construction if Congress authorizes additional funds. On April 1, the Cities of Denton and Dallas will present a statement of support for the Aubrey Project before the House and Senate Appropriation Subcommittees. I l The Service area study is being conducted by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company; good progress is being made. We expect to receive their final report in March. Upon comp'^tion of the study we will forward to you a copy. j A olty utility providing Dallas with water purification and distribution, waste water collection and treatment 10 Mr. Harvey Davis March 5, 1980 Pg. 2 Harvey, we appreciate both your interest and your support in the development ~r• of vital water resource projects, Thanks. Sincerely, k•. /erel ThomaTaylor Assistant Direc r Water Utilities Department mb s Attachment C: W, 0. Bankston, Texas Water Development Board Herbert Grubbs, Texas Department of Water Resources i ~kf.Nnt.~N19 ► City Manager of Denton I i I , EE i A I' t i I w h it I I! i `I C~ J _ _ ~r BUILDING / D1 NTON, TEXAS 7b201 / TE~-E~'~`IONF (8171 382-9601 rjExas MUNICIPAL CITY ai 1D>NTON, O,efiee of the City Manager 1 March 31, 1980 E t s Colonel Palladino, District Engineer U. S. Army District p. o. Box 1.7300 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Subject; AUBREY LAKE - DRAFT , OF WATER SUPPLY CON'IFtACT WITH CITY Or DENTON 1 Dear Colonel Palladino: F it does not eased on our review of the above document, appear that the source and nature of r PaydelineedtheA precise Denton to the U. S. Cvvernment is clew y to the criti ion ncials posture aLfo he City viand and 'determination of this ufina maintenance of a sound the matter at this therefore seek your indulgence in resolving time. F E it is respectively requested that, the in light of the above, a of contract payments referred he City's combined Waterworksy nd pledge I surplus revenues o Sewer System, after payment of all expense of operating And maintaining such system and after providing for payment of all debt service, reserve, or other requirements in connection with S Revenue Bond now City's Waterworks and Sanitary Sower outstanding or thage which n r.eattertbe issued on then same i ight he { basis. Because of covenants set forth in ordinances authorizing ; and securing outstanding waterworks an sewer system revenue of f bands, there would be provided SsuAebr. iefi summary of these to meet. payments under the [ covenants follows: ti F i 4 i I t 5 k' f ' I 1 r i 10 Colonel Palladino March 31, 1980 Page Two (a) "The net revenues of the system in the amount required to establish and maintain the funds as hereinafter provided are hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of the Bonds and of the Additional. Bcnds, if issued under the conditions and in the manner specified in this oridnance, and the interest thereon, and it is hereby ordained that the Bonds, awe Additional Bonds, it so issued and the ! interest thereon shall constitute a first and " p or_le3n upon said revenues.' f (b) "'that so long as any of said bonds remain outstanding, the City will not sell or incumber the system or any substantial part C thereof,- and that, with the exception of the Additional Bonds expressly permitted by this ordinance to be issued, it will not incu,mber f the revenues thereof unless such i.ncumberance made junior and subordinate to all the provisions of this ordinan~ oe.~ Based on (a) and (b) above, it appears that contract j ) payments contemplated herein could be made from surplus revenues I of the water and sewer systemr,+, after operation and maintenance expenses and bond requirements have been provided. However City's obligations to pay the government out of surplus revenues would be made more secure by these additional covenants in I ordinances securing outstanding bonds: "City covenants that it will at all times charge and collect for services rendered. by the system rates suEficient to pay all operating and maintenance expenses, and other costs deductible in determining "net revenues" as herein defined and to produce each fiscal ( year net revenues in an amount not less than one and thirty hundreds (1.30) times the amounts required to pay the principle ref and interest on the Bonds, and the Rei3erve Fund 9 payments as they become due; i ' (ii) "If Additional. Bonds are issued, the City shall to the extent required fix and maintain i additional rates and collect charges for the services of the System which will produce each year "Net Revenues" in an amount not less than i i I 4 10 Colonel Palladino March 31, 1980 page Three one and thirty hundreds (1.30) m s the amounts required to pay the principle Bonds on the and mthe ents,da i asthey Bonds, and the Reserve Fund pay become due; the system should er become s a1~lable r ) c for an" ether indebtedness the Cit sha t x and main tain aO3. ona1 rates and Heat char ~s ~tor rthe services o£ the stem suff~i%ey ~p pr,ovid for~ the paymet~t thereo . i The Eol .ovJ.ng language is respectfully submitted fbr inclusion in the final contract document: AS~~ Surance of funds for contract a elm nts The City warrants that all paynents contracted hereunder shall be secured by a pledge of surplus revenues of the 7 city's combined Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System remaining after payment of all expenses of operating tin such system and after providing for aintair g her and m of payment of all debt service, reserve, n requirements in connection with the City's Waterworks It and Sanitary Sewer System Revenue Bonds now outstanding or those hereafter issued on the same g basis or on such other basis as may be approved by officer, provided, that in the event the Contracting the available to meet I i such surplus revenues are not payments contracted hereunder, the City shall either issue additional Waterworks and Sanitary Sewer System Bonds or it shall fix and collect such rates wile charges as charges for services of said combined system he a ent of all the j make possible t prompt payment payments ; aforementioned requirements including coutra cted hereunder. Payments made by the City as reurvey capital Project investment cos edim~ndtatas s replacement costs and shall bt regarded as capital expenditures." t 00 , Colonel Palladino March 31, 1980 Page Four The foregoing language would enable the City to finance its J, obligations out of system surplus revenues, within limitations. imposed in the bond ordinances referred to above, but still afford the Government full security by virtue of the covenants and obligations to levy rates and charges sufficient to cover all operation and maintenance expenses, and other costs. ' Sincerely, 1r William X. Cole Assistant City Manager WKC : j m ti r { I I 1 ~ k i ,s r } f l M ~ I I it r k t f' " DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY J FORT WORTH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS / R O. BOX 17300 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 ' REPLY TO - ' AMNTION OPI ~5 n^n asaa , SWFED-PC 1 Mx. Chris Hartung City Manager of Denton Municipal Building Denton, '.texas 76201 Dear Mr . Hartung h, C This is in regard to your March 31 f 19$0 letter ong to th.e Aubrey. LakenWater nature of payments by the city of Denton pertaining R supply contract. This information was sent for"*" 3 April 1980. 1 ; Both water supply and recreation draft contracts. were. hand -cazxi.e.d to Our After their review ~ the I, Southwestern Division office on 31 March 1980, iti.ous OCECCounsel and ~asked~ ors an ape~pC ~ . ~ pate receiving them back the end of review tracts of the draft .carree~ contracts okenf and to c anticipate April 1980, We have k r dr r.-.is month. I will follow the review of these contracts clcse~y and keep you informed of the status I I would like to take this opportunity to personally thank you and mmbexs t e co=tents, your staff for your cooperation and conatructiyduring . the 1 F t course of negotiations. If you questions regarding these contracts, pleaee,eall -me.I f . have any ' I Sincerer 1 DONALD J , PAL•LADINO 1 Colonel CE I 1 District Engineer M 3 E i V 1 . Y . I r i t ' it i. : : 1 , t r ! ~i 1 t l r r).1 4 J.1 i I r i , I ~F ,5:.i,''}. +t+~+'+~ax APR 1 1980 CITY OF DENTON MANAGER'S OFFICE F r mer orandurr c" OF DALLAS DATE May 27 y 1980 to T, E. Tayl , hector Aal1a ater Utilities sue~ecT Renewal of Aubrey Permit - Texas Water commission Attached please find rules currently in force relating to extension of reservoir permits. Clarence: Please advise suitable time to meet re renewal package. MICHAEL L. MAY Assistant City Attorney ' MLM:vmd cc' . G. T. McGranahan Clarence Warnstaff Larry McDaniel Attachment a t `I 7 s k r a t i M, 571?• srn 1" 19 1 . N F Nrti.cuiar vroceeaings 156.04 TIME EXTENSIONS 156,04.25.001-0003 The following rules are promulgated under the authority of Sections 5.131 and 5.132, Texas Water Code. .,001. DIRECT DIVERSION-BEGINNING OF WORK. Within 90 days after the issuance of a permit to appropriate state water by direct diversion, a permittee shall begin actual construction.of his proposed facilities. If the work is not commenced within the time period, the permittee may apply in writing for an extension for a specified period of time setting forth the ireasoos why the work could not be begun within the time allowed. The Commission may extend the time to begin construction fora t period not to exceed 12 months from the date of the issuance of i t the permit. 4 ! 002. CONSTRUCTION, MODIFICATION OR REPAIR OF A STORAGE a RESERVOIR-BEGINNING OF WORK, When a permit'is issued to construct ? i or modify a storage reservoir or to maintain a storage reservoir t for which modifications or repairs are required, the commission shall fix the time when actual work on the structure shall begin, E i not to exceed 2 years from the issuance of the permit. If the work is not commenced within the time period, the permittee may apply in forth the reasons 1 writing for an extension of time setting why the reservoir work could not be begun within the time required. The Commission may extend the time period to.hegin construction for a reasonable period of time. i 1 IV-12 i A P a if the date of proposed commencement of construction is more than four years from the date of issuance of the permit, notice and hearing in the manner of anew application fora permit will be required. Otherwise, no such notice is required. is If notice and hearing in the-manner of a new application for f a permit*is required, the applicant shall pay fees not to exceed $1,000 apportioned as follows: (1) filing and recording fees as stated in these rules; 4 (2) any required mailing fees; and (3) extension fee of 50 cents per acre-foot of storage, .003. EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE WORK. An application for extension of,time'to complete work may be granted upon application to the Commission. Failure to apply for an extension of time or failure to complete the work within the time required in the ~)erm:i.t may ' cause cancellation or forfeiture of the permit. The permittee may apply in writing for an extension of time setting forth the reasons i , Y why the work could not be completed within the time required. In addition to th<i fees required by law, applicants shall pay fees as prescribed in the preceding rule in the event notice is required j to be mailed and published. If the proposed completion time is more than 5 years from the date of completion required in the original 1 j permit, notice and hearing in the manner of a. new application for a permit will be required. Otherwise, no such notice is required. IV-13 I 01 memorandum WFAV o~~s May 279 1980 CITY OF DALI-AS TO AUBREY FILE 1 6U61ECT Meeting with Corps on Releases for Fish and Wildlife Larry Brown and myself met with Shia Fujiwara, Pilar Pena, Sam Garrett, Ray Losornio, Tom Johnston, and Marty Hathorn of the Corps of Engineers in Fort Worth this morning. We presented the attached pro- posal for minimum constant releases from Aubrey averaging 6 mgrs for discussion as a response to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's request for ' Aubrey releases. We presented the proposal as Dallas' minimum h guaranteed releases with the realization that actual releases from water I supply operations will be arpund 85 mgd, the greater portion of the time, 1 once Aubrey is useable, I told the Corps that I had informally contacted Texas Water Commission r on releases for fish and wildlife and that their stance was this is not in our permit and they du not like such releases. 1, also told them of J contacting the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and finding out that their release figures in 1976 are not hard and fast for,today. They can now live with lesser releases. I then stressed we were caught between a rock and a hard place with the state on one side stating they did not want releases for fish and wildlife and the federal government who will refer the Aubrey project if we don't, In a compromise to solve this situation we are willing'to release this minimum amount as part of our operation at the risk of losing some of our water during times Lewisville is full and spilling. The Corps felt that this would be favorable to the U,S. rish and Wildlife Service. However, they suggested we do two additional th'ngs, One is to present along with this proposal our anticipated water supply releases for l the next 50 years showing that only a small amount of the time these mini- mum releases will actually be in effect. They felt that the USF&WS could buy off on our proposal if they could see these projected releases. would be provided with the understanding it is only an estimate and that we can not predict what the future hydrologic cycle will do to our operation. This information could be summarized on our proposal, i.e.,"10%.of the-time the minimum releases would be in effect while 9O%,of the'time the-average release will be 85 mgd. Two, we might develop a release schedule from the date the gates are closed, so there will always be water in the channel„ f r I- en+ »o-oou r instead of waiting until water in Aubrey is at 600 feet elevation. The suggested schedule would be based on percentage that Aubrey if filled up to half full. At time Aubrey is half full. and thereafter we would guarantee minimum releases as proposed. Until such time we would only release a percent of the proposed minimum based on percent Aubrey is fully with half full being 100%. We told them these two items were reasonable and that we saw no problem with either. Larry Brown said it would take about two weeks to make runs on anticipated use of Aubrey and that once we get them we will call the 16 Corps. k + Fugi said that once we gathered all our information, we should submit it to them in a letter, they will review and discuss with us as necessary and will then present ou,r material to the USF&WS with them handling the i negotiations. One concern that Larry Brown surfaced, but was not resolved was would the Y Texas Water Commission believe we were releasing water from Aubrey while s Lewisville was spilling as part of our normal water supply operation. The Corps said that they could and would handle releases from Aubrey while flo,id releases were being made from Lewisville since it is of such a small amount. i Larry Daniel emh K -XC: Tom Taylor G. T. McGranahan Clarence Warnstaff Larry Brown 3 t I ~ ~ AhAA,N j' f I 11 1 I r i, ( Memorandum jA it o~YE May 22, 1980 C" OF DALLAS Yo Carroll Graham Assistant City Attorney j suainy Aubrey Permit (Expires 9/1/80) Attached File The Aubrey contract has not yet been signed. It is going to be nip and tuck whether it gets signed before September 1; the date our permit expires. Even if the contract gets signed, that 1n itself may not be the official start of construction, per the Texas Water Commission. Therefore, I suggest we should make preparations for requesting an extension well in advanc •-of the actual expiration date. T. E. Taylor Director Water Utilities Department mb i attachment c: 0. H. Stacha E F G. T. McGranahan Larry Shaw I C. 0. Warnstaff 1 Matal,yn Harp s t i M ~ E f i I i FM 1100011 , .,....r ,n.r^~i:•f,SisY'T'N'f...aWxiYeC'e:Y.sSNM7t'PS!70 S'?.ZY.9w..«.. rA•. r.... .r ...-n..... .v..nrMm ^t a... .r•n i ti F R ! JA?IBS W, WILSON ~ t f FT70RN GY A-. LAW ' ':J''1 IJ/~ TCCCe+CNC •76.7608 "E`^ rlOOa AN.[RIcwN pANK iowCa ARCA coot sit IN, TCXAS 76701 UJ+! 4 1 October ' 31, 1978 / nN 1 5J N:r. Carroll R. Graham kssistant,City Attorney Dallas Municipal Center - 7Bh 1500 Marilla Street C Dallas, Texas 75201 Dear Carroll: a nc3.osed is the order extending, the time on Aubrey. 1 ~ . Sincerely, I " i o&mes Pa, Wilson ,7 TW/ lbk ` Enclosure f 1 1 V i ` ,iaikh'CION ail f , i 1 ! Iv 1 I 4 AN ORDER extending the time for the City of Da114s, TeyaS, to commence construction of the projects authorized by Permits F ` No. 3311 and 798C. , On October 23, 1978, came on to be considered before the Texas Water Commission the application of the City of Dallas, Texas, seeking r a two-year extension of time to commence construction of the projects k r authorized by Permits No. 3311 aid 7980. Ater' considering the application and matters thereto related, the commission is of the opinion that the application is reasonable and should be granted. noW, TliER.EFORE, BE IT ORDERED BY THE TEXAS WATER C0101ISSION that the City of Dallas, Texas, shall corranence construction or installatio of all works authorized by Permits No. 3311 and 798C by Septeinber It 1980, and complete the projects by 8eptenber 1, 1983. All other terms and conditions contained in Permits No. 3311 and 798C which axe not specifically contrary to the terms of this, order shall remain in full force and effect. ted and entered of record, this the 25th of October, 1978. ? Exec;l TEXAS MATER COMMISSION i , { E /s/ r elz?: McDonald ATTEST: red X-iicDona?.d, C airman i s/ Joe Ca~o~~. _ /s/ Mar Ann Hefner . fl11 Co ~`~is5~oner ,r.~...._ C L L 1 1 *ary Ann Hefner, CtF'ief C erx Joe r~:,}'A',1'TLIt l)L1 fI,UYtitL'~'f }tU I;r ! i f ' t,. I. R.e\ (~l) 111771)11 V •,~rV r. , 11 i , iii :1: I' ~i ..1T.u. J, llif Ch.lis,'d.dl a,•, 'r / / t r~'i lU2 1.. l.all„~~ t4hn H;. C,.rrett li~nrc i I ,1~• .C. 11 . ~}cClcskcp C., rll:l,. ltc; , . , G}et, 6, Rarity 1978 MOX TO: Phil Bro'%'n October 30, Tom Taglor > J. h, Stacha Trai.nez, Carroll Gra'ra Aubrey file r Attorney at Lav. Mr, Jam /Sv . 1Vilson, 18th Floor American Bank Tower ,Austin, Texas 78701 Re: City of Dallas, Texas ) Dear Mr. V4~.ilson: i Enclosed are certified copies of CetyImission Omer dated October 25, 1918, extending the time for the City of Dallas, Texas, to commence construction of the projects authorized by Permits , j IN Q. 3311 and 7$8C, the details being more fully set out therein. Please advise if we may be of further assistance. Very truly yours, I_ r TEXAS WATER COMAI1SS10N I; i i i{ By r 'ary Ann Hefne i ` i Chief erk , MEiH:ag ' j t +,g Enclosure r' cc; (w/incl. • y or Dallas D'MC-'4AN t~ OV 21978' 1500 A4arilla Street 1'dAiER Dallas, Texas 75201 ap:r,IrltsTaxYloN 7? ' f I',tt. R.+\ 1.~tt~' t .lj is a 10 ? lv O~jE:R extending the time for the City of Dallas, Texas, to commence construction of the projects authorized by Permits lvo, 3311 and 798C1 1978, cane on 1~o be cons{ red before the ,e>.as on octobe_ 23, lication of ~..e City Of r Texas see-'A Vater Commission the app time to commence constr~;~ction of the prajECts a two-year extension Of t authorized by Permits No. 3311 and 798C, hereto considering the application and ;clatters trelated, is of the opinion that the application is reasonable mmi s s ion the Co and should be granted, *94Z:iSIO BE IT ORDERED BY THE TEXAS A'ATER CO.A` that NO , THEREFORE, s installation City.. of Dallas, Texas, shall corcnence construction oinstallation i September , of all works authorized by Persr,its No. 3331 and 79- by 1983- fete the projects by :>°..ptesnbeY 1 f 1580, and comp d conditions contained in Permits Not 3311 and All other terms an order contrary to the terms of this 798C which are not specifically ` in lull force and effect. shall remain 978. er, 1 this the 25th of Octob d and entered of record, Execute TZYAS '.;TER COM?FISSION s i rel;,~ ~"cDo I~ 1d y Cna~rman ,tiTTEST, Fe7onalo, 1 i S/ ~Ce n Ca s~ pear Ann Hefner e~ _ar A CZerx oe R- o'. i , Corc~ : sainr.cr p pry Ann xeznez , C, a e a 00 S:Aa'E OF T,EXaS MAN COU ~TX OF TFIVIS I, Mary Ann Hefner, Chief Clerk of the Texas 4;ater Co<<o-no of the Department of Water Resources, do hereby certify that the foregoing and attached is a true and correct copy of an Order of r' said Commission, the original of which is filed in the permanent records of `said Commission of the Department, I Given under my hand and the seal of the Texas ',,at'er Commission, this the 25th day of October 19 78 Mart Alater *~ent-7, Cha.e CIe Y Texas Commissi n 3 1 I F i } . 1 1 T Memorandum _ DD rr . DATE May, 210 1980 v CITY OF DALLAS To Mike May thru CTarearnstaff 6u8JECT Aubrey Permit Extension As you may know, Dallas requested on August 24, 1978 and received on October 25, 1978 an extension of time to commence construction I of Aubrey Reservoir as authorized and required by Permits No. 3311 and I 798C. This extension stated that Dallas must "commence construction ( or installation of all works authorized by permits No. 3311 and 798C by September 1, 1980, and complete the projects by September 1, 1983," i This is just 3 months away. f All 'indications and hopes are that final contracts will be signed, executed, and land acquisition (construction) can begin this fiscal year. However, time is running on and the contracts are still in Washington. The Ft, Worth office of the Corps indicate these contracts should be returned for local sponsor signing the end of this month or first part of next, if the contracts are not first sent to the Secretary of the r Army for preliminary review and approval. With time running on and rather than risk violating permits, please begin application for another extension of time to begin construction until September, 1, 1981. Also, The Corps indicates it will take approximately six years to complete construction, therefore please request an extension of time to complete Aubrey of September 1 1987, In this extension request, please bring the Texas Water Commission up- to-date as to where the Aubrey project now stands and Dallas' dedication to seeing it through completion. t I have notified Mr, Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities for Denton, and he i said he would have their attorneys, Booth, Lloyd, and Simmons, start work on their extension requests. Please coordinate with their attorneys so that wee, are both asking for the same thing. For your information I am attaching correspondence from the previous request and a copy of the approved extension. After you have developed a draft request, please send me a copy for circulation and comments within the j department. i , 6M 59Q-0011 ' . -2- If I can be of any assistance or provide you with any additional information, please let me know. I will be happy to work with you on this. / i Larry Daniel XC; Tom Taylor G. T. McGranahan F f l it ' E Ni f ~ r i f t - IP~\ .Memorandum BDIVE May 21, 1980 CITY OF DALLAS Il J' I • • E k ,o Aubrey File { s sue~ecr Releases for Fish and Wi 1 dl i fe Conversation with Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 1 Today, I called and talked to Mr. Leland Roberts of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. I told him of our receipt of the U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service's request for releases from Aubrey for downstream ' fisheries. I, also told him of receipt of letter from Mr. Charles Travis, Executive Director for TP&WD, with a 1976 request for release schedule. I then asked him, with his department's 1979 Statewide ; Minimum Stream Flow Recommend4tions-based on Statewide Fishery Manage- ment Recoirimendations in mind; since no specific release schedule was j I received-this time, did they or U,S, Fish and Wildlife Service wish us to comply with 1976 schedule or use the new 1979 figures to develop . a new schedule, He said we were not locked in to the 1976 schedule. Ad3ustments could be made, but he did not know how much would now be -required, He suggested that we meet with his department And the USFRWS'to ,lust discuss what they could live with now, He said if we ; wished to meet, we should contact Mr. Jim Roberts of his division. I Ca McDanieY E 1 emh XC: Clarence Warnstaff Tom Taylor G. T. McGranahan Larry Brown k r i M , I 4. moo i k ` l Memol~andum r' T DATE May 290 1980 CITY OF DALLAS To John Stacha r SU&Am Estimated Cost for ' Recreation Master Plan for Aubrey Reservoir . In.conversatians with the Ft.,Worth office of the Corps, the best estimate they have for aconsultant fee to do the recreational master planning for Aubrey Reservoir is $2Q0,000. This expense would be paid totally by Dallas (74% or $148,000) and Denton (26% or $52,:000) and subtracted from the local sponsors! share of the project amount it-the completion of the pro,ect. Larr McDaniel XCt Te,m Taylor G, T. McGrananan Clarence Warnstaff r f l svr.oo~o~ l VN MOO j i ~ i i f~ 1( , 4 r~ f Memorandum Cf7Y OF DALLAS DASE May 28, 1980 , Yo T. E. Taylor, Director Dallas Water Utilities SMEV Addendum to Memo of May 23, 1980 to Larry McDaniel r f iss Thelexas Legislative con9unction*withpU.S. Fishuand Attorney searched Wi the At ttorney General re Wildlife's regeesfindrnone. feyromalsoPoschockedsum themAttorneyaintain fisheries,. Th y, Office,and that office indicates none have been issued or requested. ithe practice of the Attorney General in the past { If ligigation is pending, has been not to issue a formal opinion. 1 r ` MICHAEL L, MAY Assistant City Attorney f MLM,vmd cc: Larry McDaniel ' Clarence Warnstaff fi I i I { I 4 r C sM t,a.," L' - - 'r Memorandum VIA DATE May 21, 1980 CITY OF DALLAS To E. Taylor Thru: nit (Expires September 1, 1980) 9ug cr Aubrey Perr On'January 2, 1980 you forwarded to me a memorandum that stated; "If we :R haven't signed a contract with the Corps of Engineers by June 1, 1980 or started work under local financing we should initiate a request to extend the permit". As you are aware, it aipears that we will probably not sign a contract with the Corps of Engineers by June 1. Therefore, we have already requested Michael May of the City Attorney's office to compile the necessary information to request the Texas Water Commission to extend the Aubrey permit. We will keep you advised and will present to you ; our request for permit extension prior to filing it wi':h the State. G Clarence Warnstaff k pl c c: Larry McDaniel Michael May z I x )LI;L JUN OG 1900 1 CITY OF DENTON MANAGER'S OFFICE vl 1 f Ito i I fr'4Y % 1~reo J WA'I':n i ! Memorandum, oATe May 23, 1960 CITY OF DALLAS To Larry McUaniel Dallas Water Utilities w' SMELT State and Federal Water Rights • I 1. When Texas was annexed, the joint resolution of the U.S, Congress « provided that Texas retain sovereignty over its public lands and waters. 2. Texas did, however, yield jurisdiction of its navigable waters to the United States to the extent that the federal constitution provides r Congressional jurisdiction over interstate and foreign coiniie:~ce• ` I 3, Riparian and appropriative rights in Texas are a product of the 4. state since the state owns all the water and the beds of navigable streams, I 4. The Rivers and Harbors Act authorizes federal regulation affecting a "navigable river of the United States." The courts have limited this.Act r to river:; navigable in fact. Navigable Texas rivers are included and subject to CorpE of Engineers regulation, irrespective of ownership, but only to the extent stated in the Act, t 5, The"Clean Water Act provides for a larger scope of jurisdiction than the Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 404 providing for jurisdiction of "waters of the United States. A lower federal court has held that "waters of the i s United States" extended federal jurisdiction to the maximum extent permissible under the Commerca. clause, and was not limited to navigability, The final meaning of the phrase is yet to be determined. The Corps has set up various types of permits under Section 404, f 6. The Fish and Wildlife Service is within the Department of Interior, and is without jurisdiction to order releases of water as you describe; r however, the Corps may have jurisdiction to order the releases at the request of Fish and Wildlife under Section 404. 7. In all probability the state will contend that since Texas owns state waters, Section 404 cannot extend federal jurisdiction beyond "navigability," ~ I MICHAEL L. MAY l Assistant City Attorney MLM: vmd 9 cc: Tom Taylor V Clarence Warnstaff 1~-AAN 2 S 80 r~ WATER 1 ~ l P SM 1"16 L L,r6Yq` e(~ tjp I I/~' 1 daNas teeter utilms City Hall • D81189, Texas 75277 • (214)070-3011 May 28. (980 ity Manager Chris Har/en City of D215 E. Mc Denton, TX 76201 Re: Proposed Minimum Aubrey Releases in Response to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Request Dear Mr. Hartung: As you are aware the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service requested during the hearing period for the Corps 404 permit that constant releases be made from Aubrey Reservoir for a downstream fishery. i After discussions with the Corps, the attached proposal was developed for presentation to the USF&WS. 'This represents what we feel is the least that they will accept and the most we should commit. Some further refinements are being made to this proposal at this point prior to formal presentation as to when and how much water will be released prior to Aubrey filling to half capacity. We will forward this to you when it becomes available. Please review this attached proposal and see if it meets with your approval. If you have any commen-6's or problems with it, let me know in the next few days. Thank you for your continued good spirit and cooperation. We will keep you informed as to any future developments. Si cerely, omas E. Taylor, Director ' Dallas Water Utilities ~I emh t XC: Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities G. T. McGranahan I City of Denton Clarence Warnstaff 215 E, McKinney Larry McDaniel Denton, TX 76201 Larry Brawn r A city utility providing Oallas with wator purification and distribution, waste water collection and treatment f I f ti l l f 3 j PROPOSAL FOR MINIMUM OPERATION FOR AUBREY RESERVOIR , WATER SUPPLY RELEASES Continuous releases from Aubrey can be initiated after the lake level f at Aubrey has risen to 6401 feet (192,000 acre feet storage), Thereafter, E DallaF and Denton can make combined releases for 4later supply averaging t at least 10 cfs (6 mgd). In case of an extreme drouth such that the total storage in both Lakes Aubrey and Lewisville became depleted to about 300,000 acre feet, with a small part of 01s storage being in Aubrey, Dallas and Denton retain the right to release'all t1he water in Aubrey to Lewisville. Thereafter, while the drouth continued, the natural flow in the channel would not be impounded but would'continue down the channel to Lewisville. in Aubrey, i NOTE * This amount is the equivalent of the minimum i P stated in the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department "Statewide Minimum Streamflow Recommendations" t for the two streams that will be regulated by the proposed Aubrey Lake. a r` f f E: r' v i i { ' PROPOSED MONTHLY RELEASES FOR WATER SUPPLY ' E LAKE AUBREY MONTH CFS MGD JAN 12 g FEB 1B 12 MAR 30 19 APR 25 16 MAY 39 25 JUN 22 14 JUL 6 AUG 3 2 SEP. 5 3 OCT 6 q i NOV 7 5 DEC, 7 5 i f I 4 3 f t r f j j i P water utilities City Hall • Dallas, Texas 76277 • (214)670.3011 I June: 16, 1980 Colonel Donald J. Palladino District Engineer u. S. Corps of Engineers P. 0. Box 17300 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Dear Colonel Palladino:' 1 Attached is Dallas and Dent,on's proposal for minimum operation for Aubrey Reservoir water supply releases that you requested in your letter April 25, 1980. This proposed schedule is to be used in your discussions with the U, S. Fish and Wildlife Service in response to their request for a minimum release schedule during the comment period of Section 404 j (b)(1) of the Clean Water Act for Aubrey Reservoir. I If you have any questions or need any additional information please call me or Mr. Clarence Warnstaff (214-670-5209). Thank you,for your continued cooperation and efforts to expedite this project. i i E Sincerely, Thomas E. Taylor Director DALLAS WATER UTILITIES l1 xc : City ~.ana9 City of Denton A city utility providing Dallas with water purilloatlon and distribution, waste water collection and treatment i 'I 1 4 k f~` ley\1 I PROPOSAL FOR MINIMUM OPERATION FOR AUBREY RESERVOIR WATER SUPPLY RELEASES i Once deliberate impobndment has begun in Aubrey Lake until the lake is half full, the minimum conservation storage release by Dallas and Denton will be determined by the following minimum monthly release formula: Minimum Monthly Release (Monthl Rate per table x Maximum tlbtaine,d Stara e a u oragp) Thereafter the minimum release half full, and reacher, i After the lake once will average 15 cfs (JD mgd), apportioned to monthly rates as follows: MONTH CFS M6D 8 JAN 12 FEB 18 12 MAR 3Q 19 i ~ 16 APR 25 39 25 i MAY 14 j JUN 22 JUL 6 4 2 AUG 3 SEP 5 3 OCT 6 4 NOV 7 5 ~i DEC 7 5 In case of an extreme drouth such that the total storage in both Lakes Aubrey and Lewisville became depleted to about 300,000 acre feet, with a small part of this storage being in Aubrey, Dallas and Denton retain the . right to release all the water in Aubrey to Lewisville. Thereafter, while the drouth continued, the natural flow in the channel would not be impounded in Aubrey, but would continue down the channel to Lewisville. Based on past hydrologic cycles and experience the above minimum release schedule is expected to be exceeded the majority of the time. The average release is expected to be approximately 132 cfs during many of the years. LAW UPFICES BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A PROFESSIONAL CORPOOATION 302 SAN JACINTO BUILDING 9TH R SAN JACINTO E AUSTIN, TEXAS 78705 F FRANK R. BOOTH b12•-A70.950fi ROBERT H. LLOYD j! LUTCHER B. SIMMONS l; PAUL Q. GOSSELINK !f SKIP NEWSOM p PATRICK W. LIND14ER July 7, 1980 I 1 i Mr. Carroll R. Graham iM Assistant City Attorney Dallas Municipal Center I, 1500 Marilla street Dallas, Texas 75201 I Re: Extension of Time - Aubrey Project Dear Carroll: Enclosed is a proposed joint application for extension of time to commence and complete construction of the Aubrey ti Project. Let me know if it is acceptable and X will forward the original 'co Denton for signature and then to you for Dallas' signature. Since the times requested do not exceed the times R specified in DWR Rule 156.04.25.001-.003,,we should avoid the need of notice and hearing in the mariner of a new permit application. Fees will be $30.00 for filing and recording and _$1,000.00 for extension. T suggest Denton tender a check for 26% of this amount and Dallas for 74% when we i file the application. Kindest personal regards, I Very truly yours, FRB/ms Fr Anke. Booth Enclosure co: w/enclosure: I Chris Hartung Bob Nelson { t ~ s j s j I I APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION § OF TIME TO COMMENCE AND § B COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF § BEFORE THE AUBREY DAM AND RESERVOIR § TEXAS WATER COMMISSION PROJECT UNDER PERMIT NOS. § 798-C, 3311, 1706-A AND § IN AUSTIN, TEXAS 3312 § 11 " j i' APPLICATION OF CITIES OF DALLAS AND DENTON 1 OI: EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMMENCE AND COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF AUBREY DAM AND RESERVOIR PROJECT e i TO THE HONORABLE TEXP.S WATER COMMISSION: 1 i ' NOW COME the Cities of Dalla-, and Denton and file this i 1 joint application for an extension of time to continence and complete construction of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers' Aubrey Dam and Reservoir Project 7 pursuant to Dallas' Permit Nos. 798-C and 3311 and Denton's Permit Nos. 1706-A and 3312, and in support thereof would show the Comm.issi t on the fr followings Applicant City of Dallas has negotiated a contract with , the U. S. Corps of Engineers to obtain 74% of the project's conservation storage and to repay 74% of the local cost of the project. Denton has negotiated a contract with the U. S. $ Corps of Engineers to obtain 26% of the e project's conservation storage and to repay 26% of the local cost of the project. Permit Nos. 798-C, 3311, 1706-A and 3312 respectively were issued to Dallas and Denton on September 1, 1976? ire a manner consistent with their negotiated contracts, E` Each permit required construction of the Aubrey Project to commence on or before September 1, 1978, and be completed on or before September 1, 1981. By orders entered on October 25, 1.978, the Commission extended the time under t each permit to require construction of the project. to commence on or before September 1, 1980, and to be complete(4 on or before September It 1983. f III. Since the permits were issued on September 1, 19;6, ` Dallas and Denton have actively and diligently pursued. r ' . } i construction of the project and have accomplished the following actions which constitute good cause for failure to j timely commence and complete the project: j s 1. Draft contracts were received from the U. S. Corps of Engineers in 1975 and were in final negotiated form on or before December 1976. 2. On February 23, 1976, the City Counsel of Dallas i i a ; adopted a resolution suspending further capital improvements in any way beneficial to the city's customer cities until f - the rate dispute between Dallas and certain customer cities was resolved. 3. On July 51 1979, the ~ y permits were sustained by the ' Texas Supreme Court's refusal of application for writ of error in City of Crisco v. Texas Water Commission, et al., an appeal from the Commission's orders granting the permits. 4. On or about August 23, 1979, the Dallas Rate Case i R was settled in substantial part. r, 5. On or about September 50 1979, Dallas and Denton i authorized LWFW, Inc. to prepare a Financial reasibility Study for the Aubrey Dam and Reservoir Project. Negotiations s with the U. S. Corps of Engineers also resumed at this time. 6. On November 9, 1979, Dallas and Denton received Revised Draft Water Supply and Recreational Contracts from i the U. S. Corps of Engineers and final contract negotiations were undertaken. 7. On January 22, 19817, the City Council of Denton F approved the contracts. 8. On January 23, 1980, Dallas and Denton accepted the LWF'W, Inc., Financial Feasibility Study for the Aubrey Project. 9. On January 30, 1980, the City Council of Dallas approved the contracts. 10. On March 28, 1980, Dallas and Denton wet with the U. S. Corps of. Bngineers to sign and finalize the contracts in order for the Corps to forwaz'd the same to the Chief of 2 - Engineers, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers for approval. 11. On April 1, 1980, a delegation from Dallas and Denton met with U. S. Senate and House of Representatives subcommittees to request that additional funding for the Aubrey Project be included in the 1981 Federal Budget. IV. Dallas and Denton are continuing every effort within I their abilities to move forward with the U. S. Corps of E Engineers to secure commencement of construction of the j Aubrey Project. At this time, the cities and the Fort Worth District of the Corps of Engineers are awaiting contract h $ approval by the Chief of Engineers and submission of the f contracts to the Secretary of the Army for final signature and approva.'. Upon final approval by the Secretary of the Army, construction and land acquisition can commence. The I s Fart Worth District of the Corps of Engineers contemplates land acquisition will. commence on or about October 11 1980. WHEREFO,%E, the Applicants respectfully request that the h Commission extend the times for commencement of construction ! r I under Permit Nos. 798--C, 3311, 1706-A and 3312 to September J.; 1982, and for completion to September. 1, 3.986. Respectfully submitted, F CITY OF DALLAS TAY : ~ ~ - Mayor IE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS § i Sworn and subscriled to before me this day of 1980. l Notary Public 1n and for Dallas County, Texas 4 i R 3 - L 612T J CITY OF DENTON EiY 2 E, Mayor STATE OF TEXAS ~ ~I COUNTY OF DENTON Sworn and subscribed to before me this day of r s r 1980. f Notary-PuM1a.c n and for----- Denton County, Texas s 1 5 { C i a 4 i Z i , i I$ f { f t { ~I ' 1 RESOLUTION NO. i k A RESOLUTION Off' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALLAS AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO FILE AN APPLICATION WITH THESTEXAEXTEND DEPARTMENT OF WATER R TO THE TIME TO C014MENCE AND COMPLETE CON- STRUCTION UNDER PERMIT NOS. 79$-C AND 33110 3 PREAMBLE k WHEREAS, the City of Dallas holds Permit Nos. 798-C an 3311 authorizing the construction of the U. Corps of Engineers' Aubrey Dam and Reservoir Project and WHEREAS, the permits require construction to commence I by September 1, 1.980 and be completed by September 1, 19$3; and WHEREAS, an extension of time under the permits is necessary because the U. S. Corps of Engineers cannot commence or complete the Aubrey Project with the time a authorized in the permits, NOW, THEREFOREr BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALLAS: That the Mayor of the City of Dallas be and is hereby E 4 authorized to file with the Texas Department of Water Resources ! a joint; application with the City of Denton for an extension h of time to commence and complete construction under Permit Nos. 798-C and 3311. t PASSED AND APPROVED on this day i~ 1980. Mayor.' i , ATTEST: City Secretary f t r k i { f uµ, l ~ i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO FILE AN APPLICATION WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES TO EXTEND THE TIME TO COMMENCE AND COMPLETE CON- STRUCTION UNDER PERMIT NOS. 1706--A AND 331.2. PREAMBLE ' -rte j WHEREAS, the City of Denton holds Permit Nos. 1706-A and 3312 authorizing the construction of the U. S. Corps of Engineers+ Aubrey Dam and Reservoir Projectr and j WHEREAS, the permits require construction to commence by September 1, 1980 and be completed by September 1, 1983; and WHEREAS, an extension of time under the permits is ! i necessary because the U. S. Corps of Engineers cannot { j commence or complete the Aubrey Project with the time s i ~k authorized in the permits; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: { That the Mayor of the City of Denton be and is hereby 1 ? authorized to file with the Texas Department of Water Resources a joint application with the City of Dallas for an extension of time to commence and complete construction i under Permit Nos, 1706-A and 3312. PASSED AND APPROVED on this day of 1980. !i Mayor. ATTEST: City- Sec:retary~~~ i E i f 4 ` { 1 I t i 4 ( E Y r i f II i E 1 -0 f I ! f 1 I f r E G 3 1330 3,83JVNVW ` NOIN30 J0 AI10 .y 0861 60 'lnr a r.., Memorandum DAVo DATE July 8, 1980 CITY OF DALLAS To Aubrey File SUWEOT Status of Contracts I talked to Mr. Fugiwara with Fort Worth Office of the Corps today about his recent trip to Washington, D. C. He said that he and Col. Palladino took a letter to OCE for their signature to attach to contracts to be sent to Secretary of the Army, The letter pointed out the assurance of funds clau;ae as. being different from standard contract with explanation as to why it was included and that the District and Division offices are suppoi^tive to its inclusion, ' He said OCE was to sign the letter and forward the contracts today to the Secretary of the Army. He, also indicated that they are aware of our tight schedule to have contracts signed and construction begun before October 1, 1980. 'As far as financing goes he said on or around July 1 the House of L Representatives approved the 1580 supplemental appropriations bill which included up to $7,004,000 for Aubrey. This was sent to the Senate who approved it or, July 3, but with modifications. Fuji said they don't know (~.or t this time what the modifications were or if they involved Aubrey, l!'- eliminary indications of the 1981 budget, which is in subcommittee now, is that it supposedly has only $1.5 million in it for Aubrey at this time. They will continue to monitor this. Larry McDaniel PI C C G. T, McGranahan I Larry Shaw Clarence Warnstaff Mike May 6 0 Q~ ~x " ~ ..7,a coo f •M 1f64tl11 ~ 1 LAW OFFICE'S BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A PROFESSIONAL GORPORATION 302 SAN JACINTO BUILDING 9TH & SAN JACINTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 FRANK R. BOOTH 512-476-9506 ROBERT H. LLOYD LUTCHER B. SIMMONS PAUL G. GOSSELINK SKIP NEWSOM July 22, 2 , 1980 PATRICK W. LINDNER y I* Mr. Chris Hartung City Manager 216 E. McKinney Street Denton, Texas 76201 Re: Aubrey Extension Dear. Chris: Enclosed is the original and one copy of the referenced application revised pursuant to Dallas' request. Please have your council adopt the previously furnished resolution, sign the original and return to me with a'certified copy of the resolution. I Very truly yours, FRS/ms Frank R. Booth Enclosures r I cc: w/attachment: Bob Nelson 00 W g ° LC _ ; & I ` f ~S u 5 1'Ni tie n P'~ ' C]. _ I asIAUSS 1aI303N mnts9 , ~ ~ In ~ ~ _sa91AS3s 1YN911a9 ~ f W' ~~~a ~ 9334 U0J'N3A9YW19Ifdi1nsN07 a - ^ ' - 901 aJV '001301110-4 d I j i 1 • • 1 1 17 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DEMON X CITY OF DMTTON ~ X, Drooks' Holt, City Secretary of the City of Denton, Texas, do ► hereby CERTIFY that the attached Is a'true and correct copy of ' a r .9nhi 4 nn ~rA1 A~ p as same appears o~ n my office ~ti k e o. 4857 In Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and the official seal of the City of Denton, Texas this ~ 29 day of ~ July A.D. 19 80 s ~ Bolt • City Secretary City of Denton, Texas f 1 I M K r r G . f i R E S 0 L U T 1 0 N WHEREAS, the City of Denton holds Permit Nos. 1706-A and 3312 authorizing the construction of he U.S. Corps of Engineers' Aubrey Dam and Reservoir Project; and WHEREAS, the permits require construction to commence by September 1, 1980 and be completed by September 11, 1983; and i WHEREAS, an extension of time under the permits is necessary because the U.S. Corps of Engineers cannot commence or complete the Aubrey Project with the time authorized in the permits; NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT RESOLVED BY 'THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O(' DENTON: That the City Manager of the City of Denton be and is hereby authorized to file with the Texas Department of Water Resources a joint application with the City of Dallas for an extension of time to commence and complete construction under Permit Nos, 1706-A and 3312. day of LC-~ 1980. PASSED AND APPROVED on this, STEWXRVFO -MAYOR CI Y OF D NTON, TEXAS ATTEST: I CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM C,J, TAYLOR, JR. , CITY ATTORNEY ' CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 8Y. r ' r L i APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION § OF TIME TO COMMENCE AND § BEFORE THE COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF AUBREY DAM AND RESERVOIR § TEXAS WATER COMMISSION PROJECT UNDER PERMIT NOS. § 798-C, 3311, 1706-A AND § IN AUSTIN, TEXAS 3312 § APPLICATION OF CITIES OF DALLAS AND DENTON FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMMENCE AND COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF AUBREY DAM AND RESERVOIR PROJECT TO THE HONORABLE TE1 S Y4ATER COMMISSIONS HOW COME the Cities of Dallas and Denton and fi~,e this joint application for an extension of time to commence and i complete constrIlot!on of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers' Aubrey Dam and Reservoir Project pursuant to Dallas' Permit I Nos, 798-C and 3311 and Denton's Permit Nos. 1706-A and 3312, and in su I , pport thereof would show the Commission the followings 41 x. Applicant City of Dallas is negotiating contracts with the U. S. Corps of Engineers to obtain 74% of the project's conservation storage and to repay 74% of the local cost of the project, Denton is negotiating contracts with the U. S. Corps of Engineers to obtain 26% of the project's conservation storage and to repay 26% of the local cost of the project. Permit Nos, 798-C, 3311, 1706-A and 3312 respectively were issued to Dallas and Denton on September It 1976. xI. Each permit: required construction of the Aubrey Project to commence on or before September 11 1978, and be completed on or before September 11 1981. By orders enterod on y~ October 25, 1978, the Commission extended the time under each permit to require construction of the project to commence s on or before September 1, 1980, and to be completed on or before September 11 1983. I IxI. Since the permits were issued on September 1, 1976, I Dallas and Denton have actively and diligently pursued f 10 construction of the project end have aclomplished the following actions which constitute good cause for failure to timely commence and complete the project: 1. Draft contracts were received from the U. S. Corps of Engineers in 1975 and negotiations began at that time. ~2. On February 23, 1976, the City Council of Dallas i adopted a resolution suspending further capital improvements in any way beneficial to the city's customer cities until i the rate dispute between Dallas and certain customer cities C j wan resolved, 3. The City of Vrisco filed suit against the Texas Water Commission upon their September 1, 1976 issuance of permits for Aubrey Reservoir to the Cities of Dallas and Denton. i j 4. On July 5, 1979, the permits were sustained by the Texas Supreme Court's refusal of application for writ of error in City of Frisco v. Texas Water Commission et al., an appeal from the Commission's orders granting the permits. 51 On or about August 23, 1979, the Dallas Mate Case was settled in substantial part, i 6. On or about September 51 1979, Dallas and Denton authorized DWIVW Inc. to prepare a Financial Feasibility Study for the Aubrey Dam and Reservoir Project. Negotiations with the U. S. Corps of Engineers also resumed at this time. 7. On November 9, 1979, Dallas and Denton received Revised Draft Water Supply and Recreational Contracts from the U. S. Corps of Engineers and final contract negotiations were undertaken. 8. On January 22, 1980, the City Council of Denton authorized the mayor to enter into contracts with the U. S, Corps of Engineers for Aubrey Reservoir after completion of final negotiations on these contracts, 9. On January 23, 1980, Dallas and Denton accepted i the I,WFW1 Inc,, ?inancial Feasibility Study for the Aubrey Project. 10. On January 30, 1980, the City Council of Dallas authorized the City Manager to execute contracts with the U. S. Corps of Engin,ers after completion of final negotiations on these contracts, k 11. On March 28, 1980, Dallas and Denton met with the U. S. Corps of Engineers to finalize the contracts in order f for the Corps to forward the same to the Office of the Chief i Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers for approval. f 12. On April 1, 1980, a delegation from Dallas and Denton met with U. S. Senate and House of Representatives subcommittees to request that additional funding for the Aubrey Project be included in the 1981 Federal Budget. s Dallas and Denton are continuing every effort within their abilities to moire forward with the U. S. Carps of Engineers to secure commencement of construction of the Aubrey Px~;Ject. At this time, the cities and the Fort Worth Distrio,t of the Corps of Engineers are awaiting contract approval by the Office of the Chief Engineer and submission of the contracts to the Secretary of the Army,for final approval. Upon final approval by the Secretary of the Army, and signing of contracts by the two Cities, Corps of,Englneers( and the Secretary of the Army, construction and land acquisition can commence. The Fort Worth District of the Corps of Engineers contemplates land acquisition will commence on or about Octol)er 1, 1980. WHEREFORE, the Applicants respectfully request that the Commission extend the times for commencement of construction under Permit Nos. 798-C, 3311, 1706-A and 3312 to September 11 1982, and for completion to September 1, 1986. Respectfully submitted, t CITY OF DALLAS BYs City Manager 3 W STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS § Sworn and subscribed to before me this day of _ _ _ _ ► 1980. r j 4 Notary Public in and for ! Dallas County, Texas j J CITY OF DENTON BY. City Manag STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON S s Sworn a subscribed to before me this day of r 1 , 1980. 1 No ry Public in and Er Denton County, Texas i j i I i j i ~ f 4 LAW OFFICES BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 302 SAN JACINTO BUILDING 9TH & SAN JACINTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 FRANK H. BOOTH 812 - 478~9506 ROBERT H. LLOYD LUTCHER B. SIMMONS PAUL G. GOSS£LINK SKIP NEWSOM August 4, 1980 PATRICK W. LINDNER Mr. Carroll Graham Dallas City Attorney's Office 7 BN-Dallas City Hall 1500 Manilla Street Dallas, Texas 75201 Res Aubrey Permit Extensi.un of Time Dear Carroll: t Enclosed is the original application for extension of time on the Aubrey Project. Please have the same signed k and notarized and return to me with Dallas' check for $740.00 or whal,evex you think 74% of the fees may be. { Very truly yours, i FRB/ms Frank R. Booth Enolosure R t cc: w/o enclosure: Chris Hartung' Bob Nelson I ' { i r I ~ I I I 1 dcdkas water Obt City Hall • Dallas, Taxes 76277 • (214)670.3011 11 August 1980 . F Mr, S. Fujiwara, P. E. Chief, Engineering Division U. S. Army Corps of Engineers P. 0. Box 17300 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Dear Mr. Puj Nara: Enclosed are the signed-origlnals of the water Supply and Recreational Development contracts for Aubrey Lane. We thank you and all of your fi organization for expediting these contracts. Sincerely, Thomas E. Taylor, Director City of Dallas Water Utilities i E d j Attachments Mr, a. Chris Hartung, City Manager City of Denton, TX r l Mr. Robert Sloan, City Secretary City of Dallas, TX I i I I 1 A city utility providing Dallas with water purifloation and distribution, waste water collection and treatment r LAW'UIFICCS BOOTH, LLOY{7 AND SIMMONS A PROFESSIONAL CUHPOHANON 302 SAN JACINTO BUILDING C 9TH & SAN 0.0NTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 FRANK R. BOOTH 512-478-.'506 ROBERT H. LLOYD r ) LUTCHER 8, SIMMONS PAUL G, GOSSELINK 6 SKIP NEWSOM PATRICK W. LINDNER August 18, 1980 Mr. Harvey Davis Executive Director Texas Department Of Water Resources P. 0. Box 13087 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 Re: Application for extension of timo to commence and complete construction, Aubrey Reservoir Project, Permit Nos. '798-C, 3311, 1706-A and 3312 Dear Mr. Davis I Enclosed is the joint application of the cities of Dallas and Denton for extension of time to commence and complete construction undo.r tho permits authorizing the I Aubrey Reservoir Project. t Also enclosed are two checks totalling $1,000.00 for filing fees, $762.20 from Dallas and $237.80 from Denton, , Very truly yours, I FRB/ms Frank R. Booth Enclosures cc: w/o enclosures: Carroll. Graham Chris Hartung I I f i I I ~ CdTYaf DLCIIPTUN, TEXAS MUNICIPAL 13UlLDhVG i DEN7'ON, TEXAS 76.; 7EL.EPHONF. (817) 56682Q0 it Office of the City 1i1~l~af;r~r August: 13, 1980 1 ~ 1 I ~ Uo S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 17300 i~ Fort Worth, IPexas 76102 i Attn: Col, Donald Paladino Dear Sir: As a result of our conversation with Mr, S. Eujiwara and his staff on August 13, 1980, I am rescr i regarding Denton's financial capabilities soto additional:. information I Aubrey Reservoir Project. participate in the sake Aubrey :Project last January :1980, gouDr util.i'Aeslstaffti erf rm a the is j analysis of the financial impact Aubrey reservoir would have on the r I water rate payers of Denton through the year 2000, j E Attached for reference purposes are the analysis. Water rage increases are depictedainiCstair- ults op ofashion while corresponding revenues are represented by a solid black line, The dashed :line represents increasing water volume usages. Present water rates are 950 per 1000 E Increase to $1.29 per 1000 gallons and are anticipated to d & M increases gallons in the late 1980's, due to normal ( , purchased water costs and additional capital additions. 0 & M was anticipated to increase at 10~ per year purchased water from Gallas for all volumes over 9.5 MGT) r anticipated to increase from 12p/1000 were j 1990 and capital. additions for distribu gal tionnsy1981 stem~w 0 300 $120/customer, water p] ' ant ~ ere"estimaged at included. 'llhe analysis wau based dontDenton abe in ing d were also T.. of the debt service of the Water Storage anu yecreatic.i,ipadebtiplus all 0 & M expenses in 1990. Capital costs of the ro e on 1979 costa escalated at p ct were based 8$ to completion in 1990. i 1 r ' 1I I 1t 1 f J U.S. Army Corps of Engineers August 13, 1980 Page Two The water rate is anticipated to increase from $1.24/1000 gal in 1989 to $2.05/1000 gall in 1990, an increase of approximately 65%, } as a result of the debt service and 0 & M expense of Aubrey Reservoir. These rates are based on a water usage of approximately 5.6 billion gaLons, a, volume based on a 1975 Freese & Nichols water } supply study. The rate of $2.05/1000 gal in 1990 discounted back to 1980, using a discount rate of 9% would represent a cost of approximately $.94 wh;tch is equivalent to the present day cost of t water for Denton water rate payers. i The water rate is anticipated to increase to $2.50 by 1999 from normal capital and O.A M cost increases. We project an increase to $2.86/1000 gal.. in 2040 as a result of the increased debt service from the remaining 48% of the Aubrey reservoir debt. This rate, discounted at 9t back to 19800 wotild represent a rate of approximately 520/1000 gal at present day costs. , ! Considering the analysis discussed above, the City of Denton has concluded that the cast of water from Aubrey Reservoir, although certainly higher than Denton's present coats in real. do1],axs, are r reasonable in light of any other water source availabld and ! furthermore are within the financial capability the average water rate payer of the City of Denton. Please advise if additional information is desired. Sincerely, G. Chris Hartung { City Manager { GCH: jm I I 1 i I LAW OrFICI'S BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 302 SAN JACINT'O BUILDING 9TH R SAN JACINTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 FRANK R. BOOTH 512-478.9508 ROBERT H. LLOYD LUTCHER B. SIMMONS PAULO,'30SSELINK September 30, 1980 s' SKIP NEWSOM PATRICK W. LINJNER f S , Utilities Afr. R X,.exas Nelson 216 Enney Dento 76102 HE: Extension of Tim- Aubrey Project Dear Bob: f The enclosed letter to Carroll Graham is self } explanatory. Please send me Denton's Check in the amount of $1,762.20 Comprising the remainder of the $2,000,00 fee to i ` extend time under Permit Nos. 1706-A and 3312. Upon re ceiPt,`1 will transmit the same to the Executive Director under protest. Kir;dest personal regards, Very i~ru.ly yours ' ' Frank R. Booth PRI33 jj ' f I cc: Chris Hartung Carroll Graham , j { P r r _ [AW OFFICES BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS 3~6", 1!7 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 302 SAN JACINTO BUILDING (1 9TH & SAN JACINTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 76701 F ANK R. BOOTH 512-A76•~J506 t ~~U ROBERT H. LLOYD LUTCHER B. SIMMONS September 24, 1980 1 PAUL G, GOSSELINK SKIP NEWSOM PATRICK W. LINDNER I , Mr. Carroll R. Graham Dallas City Attorney's Office 7 BN-Dallas City Hall 1500 24ari.lla Street Dallas, Texas 75201 RE: Extension of %me, Aubrey Project Dear Carroll: ' i Enclosed is a copy of a letter from Jerry BoyO at I the Department of Water-Resources stating that they will require a $1000.00 fee for each permit. T have discussed this with the Department and did not get any encouragement 1 that their mind would change, i I Water Code 11.145 states "The Board may fix fees, not to exceed $1000, for extending the time to begin construction of reservoiro." We might argue that this means $1000 fora ~ ' reservoir, not $4000 for four permits for the same reservoir. 3 i On the other hand, it may be less expensive to send the other t $3000. Let me know your thoughts. 3 i I Kindest personal regards, i # very truly yours, I Frank R. Booth i FRB:jj Encl. I cc: Chris Hartung Robert Nelson r / ~L, nab u$ t C~~~ k~ lam' J . j VeT i L LAW OFFICES BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 3D2 SAN JACINTO BUILIDI G 9TH & SAN JACINTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 FRANK R. BOOTH 512-478-9506 i ROBERT H,LLOYD September 30, 1980 LUTCHER B. SIMMONS PAUL Cl. GOSSELINK SKIP NEWSOM PATRICK W. LINDNER 1 Mr. Cargo 1. R. Graham Dal s C ty Attorney's Off 7 BN-Da las City Hall r 1500 M r 11.1 Street 3 Dalla., exas 75201 j RE: Extension of Time I, I Aubrey Project R ~ j Dear Carroll: I discussed the fee question with the Texas Department ► ~i of Water Resources General Counsel Reg Arnold. After checking with his folks, Reg toad me yesterday that the Dapartment had tic firm view on what the proper fee :should be. He suggested we pay the balanco under protest and ask the Commission to give us a refund. Reg's idea seems reasonable to me and we have nothing to lose by asking for i the refund. ; My records indicate Dallas previously paid $762.20 and Denton paid $237.80. I am requesting Wanton to send me a I check for the balance of its $2,00.0.00 or $1,762.20. I l suggest that you send the Executive Director Dallas' check ' for $1,237.80 under protest. I will do likewise for Denton. i' Should you prefer, send Dallas' check to me and I will transmit both checks to the Executive Director under protest. Kindest personal regards, 11 , I Very tr'Aly yours, f 00 t Frank R. Booth j j i ' FRB: j j I cc: Chris Hart.ung/ Robert Nelson f i F r Lnw orrr,es \J- BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A P1101A MCINAL. CORPORATION 302 SAN JACINTO (WILDING 9711 $ SAN JACINTO nl1S rIN, -rt XAS 711701 PRANK R, BOOTH 512-4/8-95106 110131:1{T If. LLOYD LUTCI It n [1, SIMMONS . PAUL 0. GOSSELINK SKIP NEWSOM 4 PATRICK W. LINON1_n November 1.8, .1.980 i Executive Director Texas Delartment. of Water Resources P. 0. B .1..3087 Capitol MaLion Austin, exas 78711 Attention: Jerry G. Boyd, P.E. j I Re : Cities of Da1..l.as and Den Lon Apl'i c t ions roquesLing an begin construction of th<-Aubrn Re ervo. Project, Permit: Nos .1~13C; 3".3Trl--I, ► i and 3312. R Gentlemen: s f By IoLLer dated AugusL 12, 1,980, Mr. Jerry Boyd advised Donlon and Da.l.las that an extension of t.i.mo to ? commellce and complete consLrucLion of the Aubrey Reservoir I, Pro:}ect under the r.-eforcncr..d pormi.ts was .requ.i.rod and that Ulo rc (JU.-Lived fees for. Permit Nos. 1706A and 3312 were $1,000.00. By letter.' dated August 1.8, 1980, Dallas and i Denton filed their joint app.l.icat'i.on of the roc;uir.r_d extonsion of ti.mo and enclosed Lhoir chocks LOLa1..3.119 $1,000.00. By letter dated August 1.9801 Mr. Boyd advised the app.l.icanLs that Lhe requi..r.0d fee was $1,000.00 for ea0h P permit. App.l•icants DenLon and Dallas SMI)In.i.L that WaLer Coda l..l. ].A5 auL-hor..izes the Wr1Ler Dovelopment Board to fix F fogs, not to exceed $1,000.00, for extending the time to boi.ng construction of reservoirs. The Aubrey Resarvo.ir Pro joct is a project to be built by I-lie U. S. Army Corps of rngincors which does not need a construct-Jon porm.iL pur.:'uant to Federal law. The Aubrey Project c:oneL.i tut os one clam and reservoir near. Aubrey, 'Pexam. Addi.L.i.onii:L flood storage canacit:y w:1.11. be inc.1.11dod in the Aubi:cry RersOrvoir.• and flood storage rit Lowisvi.ll,e Ros;orvo.i.r wi1.l, be convez:Ccd to co1>s0r.vaL.ion sLorage. No G0nS1.J:LIC.`t•,i01l i cOil C'01n111,1LOd at Low.i.sv1.11e. r ( r I I I I I,xecuti.ve Di.re.cto.r ALLention: Mr. Jor.z:y G. Boyd, P. 1. November J.8, J.980 Page 2 f { { Applicants submit that 64aLer Cade 9 11.145 authorizes the Water Development Board to colloct a maximum fee of $1,000,00 to extend the Li.mfl to construct a reservoir and the fact that Dent-or and Dsallas' storage and use rights are chanted in four separate pormi.Ls is i.rmnaten- a]. to auLho.rized by 4 11.1.15. proper. constructian of the f0(3 however., in order to procoso the joInL application and obtain a bearing before the Texas Writer Commission, Applicants submit herewith Dallas' check in the amount of. $1.1237.80 and Denton's check in the amount of $1,762.20 comprising $11000.00 A!ae for each of Lho referenced permits. t T'he s e add.itional. unw are SUbm.itted u:lclcr. i)rotest and Denton and Dallas contort the adminlsL•rative i.nl:orpretati.ora i of .1.1. J.45. Applicants put Lho Depar. tmont of Water Resou:rcos on notice that they will. seek an order, from the 'roxas Water Commission ::or refund of call.. or any part of the fees submitted .1.11 exceus of $11000.00. t .y Vary truly yours, 1"I213/ntr7 Frank R. Booth I L ~ cc: Carroll Graham Chr. i.s Hartung RoborL• Nelson _ I 1 # R s: 1 NOV 24 1980 CITY OF DENTON MANAGER'S Of "(1 E CITY OF DENTON.,, if M E M O R A N D U M T0: Chris Hartung, City Manager FROM: R. E. Nelson, Director of. Utilities DAT9j November 20, 1980 RE: Recreation Development for Ray Roberts Reservoir The Corps of Engineers has taken several steps in formulating a recreational development plan for Ray Roberts Reservoir; however, + they have not yet officially agreed to allow the cities of Dallas and Denton to have the final approval of such plans as outlined in ` the contract for Ray Roberts Lake. A Dallas Water Utilities representative called this morning and advised that the City of Dallas respresentatives will not participate in any discussions regarding such planning until an official response regarding who will have final approval is received. Dallas' position is that if such approval is not granted, the cities E~E of Dallas and Denton should seek to use an outside consultant to develop a plan that best serves the interest of the public and the j cities. 1 I recommend that we join Dallas in this position regarding final approval. I also believe we should designate Dallas as the lead entity in any negotiations or planning processes, so that the Corps, if they ultimately do develop the plan, will not be negotiating and planning with two separate entities. Dallas, of course, would be expected to keep Denton informed of all of the activities and allow s ! Denton to sit in on all of the planning sessions. I will plan to keep abreast of any developments regarding this plan, but I would appreciate the opportunity to have Steve Brinkman assis, I in advising me on various details and operating costs. I Regards, 1 4 R.R. Nelsen 3 Director of Utilities REN/gcr cc: King Cole, Asst. City Manager ' File i t I E NlfYs"~f 7'ON lo/~"Yof PE#ITOAIO TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DEN, TEXAS 76201 / 7ELE?NONE l$J79100 i a December 3, 1980 I Mr, Tom Taylor Dallaz. Water Utilities City Hall r Dallas, Texas 75227 ' S Re; Hydro Electric Installations on' Lewisville and Ray Rot>erts Lakes Deer Mr. Taylor: } The City of Denton has filed a "Notice of intent" with the FERC j indicating an intent to file applications for pnrmits to install 1 small hydroelectric generating units at the outlets of Lewisville and Ray, Robcar.t.s Lakes. The purpose of this letter is to serve as a letter of understanding between the cities of Denton and Dallas regarding compensation for any value that may be realized in utilizing water flows from Lewisville and Ray Roberts 'Sakes for the s purpose of generating electric power.. The concepts listed herein were discussed in general terms with the Denton City Council on 12/2/80. The City of Denton agrees in prinoiple% to compensate the City of Dallas if any value is derived from subject water flows. The negotiations for this value shall be, on the basis of a percentage share of Denton's net benefit realized from such hydroelectric ! facility, unless some other basis of compensation is mutually I I f Page 2 December 3, 1980 ,i agreeable. Net benefit shall be calculated from the value of the difference between alternative energy sources available to the City i * of Denton and the energy produced from the subject hydroelectric facilities' utilization of the applicable safe yield of the reservoirs. The form of compensation may be either monetary or electrical energy, as doomed appropriate, Yours very truly, E r; Chris Hartung ` City Manager CI2/gcr cos Dayton City Council. Members 1 R. t lay Nelson Director of I}ti2,ities I File J i t • ~ I J r tAN! OFFICES BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A PROFESSIONAL. CORPORATION 302 SAN JACINTO BUILDING 9TH & SAN JACINTO AUS"f IN, TEXAS 76701 r FRANK R. BOO'T'H 552-4789508 i ROBERT 11, LLOYD December 16, 19 B 0 i LUTtFIER B• SIMMONS j PAUL G. GO$SELINK SKIP NEWSOM PATRICK W. LINDNER BRENT W. RYAN t Mz. Ca all R. Graham Dalla ity Attorney's Office 7BN- al .ass City Hall 1500 Ma illa Street Dall , Texas 75201 RE: Application for Extension of Time - Aubrey Project ~ E t I Dear Carroll: i Enclosed is a copy of a letter from the Department t of Water Resou::ces concerning the referenced matter, ` I Very truly yours, I I E Frank R, Booth E FRB/nlm ? encl, cc w/enclosures / Chris Hartung ✓ Bob Nelson I i ~ I 1)FC 19 1980 r CITY Of DENTON MANAGER'S OFf I(T r~ I'lsnAS I)'Alt'I',1IF,N'I' OF WA''IA IZr:SOURO'.S 1700 N. Co[igivss Arcrlue DEC f ij t~{)~ TEXAS WATER ((ygTI1SSION ~ , MS ' TEXAS WA'I'P,R IAIXF1.01'T41:N'I BOARD onald, (hairm:ul Cw Folk MCI) Louls A. Bceeherl, )r , (:Ilainnan Dursry IS. lianlcntan ` .rf 1 ~UI711 1.1. Garrett, Vice (1041111) I Joe It, c,,rroll George W. McCloskey t G}Cn I. Roney Ilarvey Davis f vc ;rvc Director i i W, 0. Iiankstolt Lonnie A. "Bo" Pilgrim December 12, 1980 S Mr. Frank R. Booth Booth, Lloyd and Simmons 302 San Jacinto Building R Austin, Texas 78701 I Dzdr P'ir. [tooth: Re, Cities of Dallas and Denton Applications requesting an extension of time to co1v"nce construction of the Aubrey Reservoir Project; Permits No, 798C (A-8340), 3311 (A-3527), 1706A (AM1590A')t and 3312 (A-3528). 811483 and 811484) for Enclosed are two Department receipts (Nos. additional fees associated with the referenced applications for ex- The Is g licati tenslon of time. additional in ormationsisfrequired,eyounwillebepinformed s and if Very truly yours, I E t Je ry G. ioy, P.E. Chief, Water Use Section Enclosures cc: City of Dallas City of Denton I 1 ~ i I i ,r I 11.0. Box 13087 C;,16101 Sioilmi • Austio,'kvis 78711 Area G,dr 512,'475.318 ~ Ak water utilities City Hall • Dallas, Taxes 75277 • (214)870.3011 i December 23, 1980 J t Mr. Harvey Davis Executive Director Texas Department of Water Resources P. 0. Box 13087 Capitol Station Austin, 'Texas 78711 i I Dear Mr. Davis; Since my last correspondence to you significant events have occurred regarding Aubrey Reservoir, 1 want to take this opportunity to advise you of these recent developments, Contracts for the construction of Aubrey were signed by the Cities of Dallas and Denton in August and forwarded to the Corps secretarineers in I Washington D. C. for final review and approval. The Army approved and signed the Water Supply and Recreation Contracts on } September 16, 1980. Attached are copies of the final signed contracts,. The project was officially initiated on September 19, 1980 by the Corps purchasing the first parcel of land. Thus, Aubrey Reservoir is underway with completion and filling expected within the next 10-20 years. Approval of the contracts and purchase of land before October 1, 1980 established the interest rate for the life of the project at 7.21 percent, For projects begun after October 1, 1980 the interest, rate is 8,65 percent. By obtaining the 1980 interest rate ODal as and Denton saved over $103 million at current estimated construction E Appropriations for Aubrey already approved by Congress provide $7 million. E Activities expected this year include; a .Develop Master Plan for Recreation *Negotiate recreation contract with Texas Parks and Wildlife to provide State Park facilities at Aubrey *Continue planning and engineering design *Continue real estate acquisition *Relocations within the reservoir site Congress has approved and President Carter has signed a House Resolution that will change the name of Aubrey Reservoir to Ray Roberts Lake effective j January 4, 1981 in honor of Congressman Roberts. i I i t A city utility providing Dallas with water purification and distribution, waste water collection and treatment { Page 2 As you are aware the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department requested that consideration be given by the Corps for minimum water releases from the Aubrey Reservoir. After careful review of proposed water operations for Aubrey and Lewisville Reservoirs R a Nemorandum of agreement between Dallas, Denton and the Corps setting y forth a minimum mater release schedule for Aubrey Reservoir was developed. The agreement provides that Dallas and Denton will endeavor to request i releases of water in such a manner that there will be continous minimum r releases. A copy of the Agreement is attached. Also attached for your review and file is a copy of the Water Service Area Study for DO las Water Utilities. Thank you for your interest In Aubrey, We will keep you advised on further developments as Aubrey progresses. 5ince~acy, Thorr~as E, Taylor E Director DALLAS WATER O ILITIES TET:CW;plc Attachments (4) cc: W. 0. Bankston, Texas Water Development Board I{erbe[rt Gruibs, Texas Department of Water Resources vgei~ 'Ci t D:Sy4t1 i i i OF C 2 9 1980 CITY OF DAN"FON MANAGER'S OFFICE s i 1 L ~ I [r ' CXTY OF WINTON M E M O R A N D U M v TO: File-- Lewisville/Ray Roberts Hydro FROM: R. E. Nelson, Director of Utilities DATE: January S. 1981 RE: Meeting with George Neal and Phil Groves + Black and Veatch- January 5, 1981 1, Send Application for Preliminary Permit January 6, 1981 2. Present Application for Preliminary Permit and Contract for. Feasibility and License Application to Board on January 210 1981. 3. Send Application for Preliminary Permit and Contract for Feasibility and License Application to. City Council on February 3, 1981. ` 44 Expect Preliminary Permit granted by Juno, 1981. 5. Feasibility Study finished January 1982 6. Board and Council approval February 1982 7. License completed and submitted May 1981 8. Enter into Engineering Contract with Black & Veatch June 1982 9. Expect to receive license by September 1982 w 10. Mttke decision on financing--band sale or internal revenue--September 1982 11. Bid Lewisville turbina October 1982 12. On line with power January 1984. } } 4 ESTIMATED COST OF ADDITIONAL WORK ` Lewisville Ray Roberts Both Feasibility Phase I $ 41,000 $ 15,000' $ 56,000 i i License Phase It 000 20.000 $ 56OO Total. $ 69,000 $ 43,000 $112,000 i r E RFN/gcr a0: Chris Hartung, City Manager E. B. Tullos, Asst. Director of Utilities JAN CITY Of b MANAGER"' j Y' JI r incas water utdities City Hall • Dallas, Texas 75277 • (214)670-3011 January 8, 1981 i Donald J. Palladino, Colonel, CE District Engineer Department of the Army Fort Worth District Corps of Engineers P. 0, Box 17300 { Fort Worth, Texas 76102 JI Dear Colonel Palladino; In your November 21, 1980 letter to me you offered to have your staff prepare the master plan for recreational development at Aubrey Reservoir. As you stated in your latter, Corps preparation of the plan would be advantageous due to your staff's familiarit with the planning process, their expertise, and your access to the higher controlling authorities. Your suggestion of a "statement of concurrence" to be signed by Dallas and Denton and placed in the master plan is appreciated. E It is our understanding that according to Article 2c of the Recreation Contract the local sponsors in cooperation with the Corps of Engineers are to develop a "mutually acceptable" plan with input from and cooperation of all parties involved, In development of the plan, agreement among all parties should be reached before proceeding from one phase of the work to the next, Agreement can be accomplished by bilateral signatures on each_set of conference notes as they occur and with a "statement of concurrence" by all parties upon completion to be inserted in the master plan prior to forwarding by Corps of Engineers to higher authority for approval, All conference notes should be a part of the master plan with the signatory "statement of concurrence" appearing at the beginning of the plan. ! In summary, please proceed with the master plan development if the following assurances can be given to the local sponsors; ► * Review and approval of each phase by bilateral signatures on the ` conference notes by the Corps and 'local Sponsors. * Final signatory statement of concurrence by local sponsors upon completion of the recreation development and management plan. JAN ].3 '1981 r ary O, DENTON MANAGER'' OFFICE A city utility providing Dallas with water purification and distribution, wastewater collectIona nd treatment I r i k I Y A +r Donald J. Palladino January 8, 1981 Page 2 * The local sponsors and the Corps of Engineers will work together to M develop a "mutually acceptable" recreation development and management; plan. With the above assurances I am certain that Dallas and Denton will be able to cooperate fully in developing the master plan as provided for in c the Recreation Contract. I have coordinated this response with the City of Denton, * Thank you for your offer of assistance in the master plan preparation and for your continued cooperation, Sincerely, I Thomas E. Taylor „ Director Dallas Water Utilities i mb i to_nol City Manager C, o' enton Jack Robinson, Director Parks and Recreation, City of Dallas t E, I E j r_ i i f LAW OFFICES BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 302, SAN JA INTO DUILOING 9TH & SAN JACINTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 512-478.9506 ' FRANK R. BOOTH ROBERT H. LLOYD LUTCHER B, SIMMONS March 23, 1951 I PAUL Q. (}OSSELINK SKIP NEWSOM PATRICK W, LINDNER ~ BRENT W. RYAN Mr. Chris Hartung I City Manager "itY of Denton 215 E. McKinney 5t, Denton, Texas 16201 RE: Aubrey Reservoir Project j I I 3 Dear Chris: Enclosed is a copy of the executive director's pleadings concerning permit 1706A and permit 3312 which relate to the k referenced project. The exeeu':.ive director had identical I pleadings for Dallas' two permits connected with the reservoir. i Y 0);pect the C.~mmission to set this matter down far hea~,~ng in the near future. ' i } Kindest personal regards. i f very truly yours, l Frank R. Booth II FRB/nlla enclosure I ~ I CITY u~ U~NTON INC FI~1~ b. MAN AGEK S ~ E I f r; IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF § BEFORE THE i# THE CITY q UBfqTON § TEXAS WATER COMMISSION i FOR AN.EXTENSION OF 1 TIME TO COMMENCE § M CONSTRUCTION OIL THE § } PROJECT AUTHORIZED BY PERMIT NQ._ 706A PLEADING OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR r 1 TO THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION: g COMES NOW the Executive Director of the Texas Departnent ~ J of Water Resources, and files this pleadincl relating to the referenced matter: i ~ j Permit No. 1706A and Permits No. 3311, 7980 and 3312 relate I to the Aubrey Project, a U. S. Army Corps of Engineers proposal which includes a clam on the Elm Fork of the 'T'rinity River in Denton County, `.i'he reservoir will impound 591.1704 acre-feet under. Permit No, 3311, and of which Denton is authorized to impound 207,896 acre--feet tinder Permit. No. l ! 3312, The Aubrey Project also involves converting 182,400 E . i acre-feet of flood storage in Lewisville Lace to conservation t storage, with the flood storage to be placed in the Aubrey reservoir, Dallas is granted 134,976 acres-feet: of this additional conservation storage in Lewisville Lake pUr.suant k to Permit No. 7980. Denton is authorized 47,924 acre-feet F of this con's er.vati.on storage under Permit No. 1706+1. Denton t ! (j and Dallas were both named local spom,,,ors of the Aubrey project to negotiate with the U. S. Corps of Engineers, with j i Dallas to receive 74 percent of conservation storage and i with Denton to receive 26 percent of conservation storage. i A L `1'he four. permits or amendments to permits were issued on j September 1, 1976, with requirements that each permittee commence construction within two years and complete construction within five years, By Commission orders of October 23, 19'78, the times to commence aa7d complete the construction authorized by these four_ permits were extended to September 1, 1980, and September 1, 1983, respectively. The Perrnittees have submitted a joint application for an extension o,: time to commence and complete construction of the projects authorized by Permit: No. 3311, No. 798C, No, 33.1.2 and No. 1706A. A copy of the application is attached. Permittees seek two year ext:enslons for commencenac:nt, to September 1, 1982, and three year ext:cnsions for completion, to September 1, 1986. The proposed commencement dztto is more than four years from t.he-. I date of issuance of the permit:, while the proposed completion date is five years from the proposed date of completion roquired in the original permit. ! Applicants have paid what- the L;xecuti.ve Director considers f r to be the proper fees, that is $1000.00 per permit for 4 which an extension is sought, as required by Board Rule 156.04.25.002. The application is sufficient for filing. Applicants have, however, paid the total. of $4,000.00 under protest, M ~ - t asserting ghat the fee required should be only $1,000 total, since this is a joint application. 'Phey claim that Section 11.145, i Texas Water Cody., authorizes the Board,, to collect a maximum fee 3 I 3 f of $1,000.00 to extend the time to construct a "reservoir." The fact that the storage and use rights to the Aubrey pro';ect- I I i ,ire grantea in four separate permits is immaterial, they claim, ! since only one project is authorized. i 1 The Lxecutive Director, asserts the $4,000.00 fee is proper. a f Section 11.145f Texas Slater Code, provides: (b) :Ef the permit contemplates construction of a storage reservoir, construction shall begin within the time faxed by the commission, not to << exceed two years after the date the permit is issued, The conuni.ssion, by entering an order of record, may . extend the time for beginning construction, The board may fixfees, not to exceed $1,000, for extending the time to begin construction of 1 reservoirs. r This section contemplates extension of provisions in a permit ! issued by the Commission. four permits are at issue here, not one. Rule 156.04.25.002 provides in part: } I, if the date: of proposed commencement of construct„i.on is more than four years from the date of issuance of the permit, notice and hearing in Lhe manner of a new application for a permit will be required. Othr~rwise, no such notice is required. If notice and hearing in the manner of a new application for a permit i.: rogu.ired, the applicant shall pay foes not to ox_ecd $1,000 apportioned as follows: (1) filing and recording fees as stated in these rules; (2) any required mailing fees; and (3) extensions fen of 50 cents por acre--fool of storage. The rule clearly requires up to $1,000.00 fee per permit. t Nli.ng fees, notice fees and extension; are listed as applicable to each permit, not to each project, Since notice and hearing 1 are to be "in the manner of a new application for a permit," it follows that Depaxtment• ru3.es and policy regarding payment of permit fees would be followed. And the DeparUiLionL consistently has required separate ices for each application. Furthermore, we are dealing here with four separaLo clauses which regtii.re extensions, The $4,000.00 fire should, therefore, be recognized as the required fee. . E j III, 1 { I { Applicants have diligently pursued the above permits, as evidenced by the narrative account of negotiations with the i ! j k k i i' s } Corps of Engineers appearing in their joint application. IV. i' The Executive Director recommends the following: 1 A. Pursuant- to Rule 156,04.25,002 and .003, the application li be filed and set for hearing, P B. The Commission rule that the fees paid by applicants, that I is $4,000.00, are the correct fees as required by the Texas Water Code and the Doard rules; C. Upon final hearing, the application for extension of time be granted in accordance with the terms of the attached dr.aff order so that applicants will have until September 1, 1982 to commence construction; and until September 11 1966 to complete construction under. permits No. 3311, No. 7980, No, 331.2, and No. 1706A. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OP' IIATER RESOURCES ~ Harvey Davis Executive Director A. 1 R1 C}-FardSOn Director, Permits Division } M. Reginald Arnold II General Counsel n ~ I 5uzannc~,-c}iwari:•r, 1 ~ Staff` 1\4.orney r I 1'. 0. Box 13087 Austin, 'T'exas 78711, E i ' } 3 , , • CrRTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of this pleadijg has been mailed, the ,'/day of March, properly stamped and addressed, this tr „ 1981, to: l 1 City of Denton Municipal Building .r Denton, Texas 76201 Mr. Frank R. Booth Booth, Lloyd and Simmons ; h. 302 San Jacinto Building ; Austin, Texas 78701 interoffice mail to Mr. Jack and that a copy has been sent by t Cox, Public Interest Advocate, Texas Department of Water Resources. { t i i i t f ~ I i ' h i i t DEPARTMENT OF WATER, RESCi )CES `1'~~~5 ~~~~~'1~~13 (af1~~r1~~ItSSlfll~f .„u . AN ORDER extending the time for City of Denton tc commence a , and complete construction i€ of the project authorized by Permit No. 1706A. On carne on to be considered bofore the Texas Water Commission the application of City of Denton seeking, a two-year extension of time to commence construction of the project authorized by Permit No. 1706A, and a three--year ex-- R tension of time to complete said construction. ` After considering the appl..cation and matters thereto related, the Commission is of the opinion that the application is r reasonable and should be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED BY THE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION that City of Denton shall commence construction or installation of all works authorized by Permit No. 1.706A by September 1., 1962, and r - complete the project by September 1, 1986. All other terms and conditions contained in Permit No, 1706A which are not specifically contrary to the terms of this order f shall remain in full fo•ce and effect. j Executed and entertsd of record, this the TEXAS WA'IFR COMMISSION i k Felix McDonald, Chairman t f ATTEST: Dor.:;cy-r3. ifardcmiin, Commissioner R Mary Ann Hefner, Chief Clerk ~ i i i i ° A . Texas Department of Water Resources ~ Y{trJYrlat:Y~vY.FrMlr.mtlira[~39 Yt'---"'tea 'mti~AY' Oii'•fF.YMV:u4etr•tYSC.Y. riVIT-4lYavmiioYF Vxxu0 Y1Pffi~.:IG iLM'm:TissY'ati9.lT.^Y'Y11.:e2GlAlN CNTC:ItU1~r'IC;E f~4GAtC)12~1NllUA1 To Texas Water Coninission DATE: January 21 1981 TE{nv Director,, ermits Division J t ' FROM Water Use Section ti suBJecT, Joint Application for extension of tinge to comWnce construction of the Proposed U.S. Arrrty Corps of Engineers Aubrey Lake and Lewisville Lake FnlargemoiA City of Dallas with 74 Percent S P-3311 (A-3527) Aubrey Lake P-798C (A-834C) Lewisville Lake Enlargement City of Denton with 26 Percent P-3312 (A-3528) Aubrey Lake a P-1706A (A-1690A) Lewisville Lake Enlargem-tit R ~ 1 A joint application for an extension of time in which to conn>ence and complete ion on the proposed Aubrey Protect was received August 19, 1980. The c r.onstruct and September 1, ; current corr~:ncement and completion dates are September l 1990 an 1983. The Aubrey Project., a U.S. Ar1V Corps of Engineers proposal includes a dam on Elm Fork Trinity River in Denton County Impounding 799,600 acre-feet of con- servation storage space, and the conversion of 182,400 acre-feet of flood j storage space in Lewisville lake to conservation storage space. The cities of Dallis and Denton are the d,:signated local sponsors of the project with 74 and } 26 percent of the conservation space respectively. Permit Nos, 3311 (Dallas) j and 3319, . (Denton) authorize the two cities to impound 591,704 acre-feet (74") and 207,896 acre-feet (26%) respectively. In addition, Permit Plos. 798C (Dallas) and 1706A (Denton) authorize the cities an additional impoundin(,1 ci)pacity in Lewisville Lake in the amount of 134,976 acre-feet (74%) and 47,424 acre-feet (26%) respectively, These four permits were issued on September 1, 1976 with requireitr~nts that each permittee confirnce construction within two years and complete construction within 5 years. r By CoaYnission orders of October 23, 1978 the times to r.nurrence anel complete the construction authorized by these four permits was extended to SUI,tcinber 1, 1980 anu Septenber 1, 1983 respectively. E The subject; application is for a two-year extension of the comrpencc,nu!nt date and three-year extension of, the completion date. lAcby the Office uf Cief cording to the e tensi E on re nginothe S . Ar•ct is awaiting t andt submission of the centrpcLs to the E:ngnrer, U.~my Corps of Engineers i ~I r ~ f i ~ E i , r F _2 lanu~rry 2, 19Et1 -2- Memo to tile Coivission Secretary of the Army for final approval. The regncst. further indicates that upon ` final approval by the Secretary of the Army and signing of contracts by the f Engineers, and the Secretary of the Army, Cities of Dallas and Denton, the Corps of' 1, } construction and land acquisition can commence, Reportedly, the Corps of Engineers j expected to commence land acquisition on about October 1 , 19130. ' Maximrrnl fees ($4000,00 or $1000,60 for each permit) its rr,qui red by ?r) rrd Rule M a 156,04.25,002 have been laid. By letter dated IIov •rabt;ri 1,3, 1~).'0 Porl i ltee's Attorney has submitted t.iie required S1000.(i0 fc,c to p, rwi t unrlr r pr est., on- r~ t,endino that a maximum fee; of $1000.00 is all O.;A i v quirod I_y the Water Code and Boacd Rules. i Pursuant to Board Rule 156,04.25.002, this project should ho se,k. For public hearing i to consider the time extension request, If the al,pl iciiticn is 5plimt(d, it is v r'ec.onrnvndr:d that the tink~ to cornnx~nc~~ cons ta•uction ()I) the proje+.t be extended two years as requested (or to September 1, 1962) avid tbai, the time to complete con- struction be ext.endod three years as requested (or to Septemher 1, 1966). t e 3 ti { r Jerry G. Boyd cc; Public Interest Advocate Dam Safety Unit i r i it tt j. 'i s BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A P110FESSIONAL C01111011A I [ON S 302 SAN JACINTO OUR 01WIP 9714 & SAW JACINTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 70701 FRANK R. BOOTH 512-478.9506 WATER USE FLf~i,li i ROBERT H. LLOYD RECEIVED LUTCHER A, SIMMONS PAUL 0, GOSSELINK SKIP NEWSOM PATRICK W. LIND.NER August 180 1980 Mr. Harvey Davis Executive Director f Texas Department of Water Rosource.c; P. 0. Box 13087 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 Y Re: Application for extension of time to commence ti and complete construction, Aubrey Reservoir Project, Permit Nos, 798--C, 3311, 1706-A and 331% Dear Mfr. Davis: Enclosed is the joint application of the cities of ? Dallas and Denton for extension of Lime to coJrxierlce and complete construction under the pormits authorizing the Aubrey Reservoir Pro,cct. ! Also enclosed ar(two c:hec}:s to'_a.Llilig $1,000.00 for i filing fees, '762.20 from Dallas and $237.80 from Denton. Vary truly yours, + I'IZL~~JI19 p)-ank R. I')o0i III nC].OS Ll1'0S Carroll Gr. ah un Chr.'iS H1I1^L0I1c) i r f ~ i I M ~ E ti f i, i APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COM1,1rNCE AND ti Ii1JF0RE THE' ~ COMPLE`I'L; CONSTRUCTION OF AUDREY DAM AND RESERVOIR § 1111"XAS WA` EIR COM1viiS>JON PROJECT UNDER PERMIT NOS. G 79B•-C, 3311, 1706--A AND G JN AUSTIN, TEXAS 3312 9 d l R APPLICATION OF CITIES OF DALLAS AND DENTON FOR f EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMMENCE AND COMPLETE. CONSTRUCTION OF AUf3R1JY DAM AND RESERVOIR PROJECT ! TO THE HONORABLE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION: NOW COHSE the Cities of Dallas and Denton and file, this p~p joint application for an extension of time to commence and F k complete construction of the U. S. Army Corps of En(ji.neers' ( Aubrey Dam and Reservoir Project pursuant to Dallas' Permit, Nos. 79B•°C find 3311 and Denton's Permit Nos. ),706-A and the]-cof would show the Commission the 3312, and in support $ following: i L. i i ApIpica nt City of r1(.,(;c,i n(l coil tract:s with Hie U. S. Corps of L.ngiiwers Lo obl.:a.i.n 74t of H he project's Conservation st:ul-ac}e and to repr:ty 74'(~ the local I - 1 cost c,.ti tJ)c projecL, Don ton i.s no(fovJaf ir(1 contracts wi.dl 1 the 11, S. Corps of Engi.I.er,l to obLa n 26:, of the project's c:ollso vat3Cl1) ~itnra(ic.' ili',d L'., ropily 26"'• (lf Lho local cosL of t1w project:. P;.vm.i,t Nos. 798-C, 3311, 1106--A loud 3312 r.espocttively wero issued to Dallas nncl Denton on September i 11 1976. al. :'lucid p{t~lllit.' rcigII .I'ic ml. ;Lruct loll of, tho ,all]rey Pr.ojoct tCi C0il1il10S1CQ (IT 0) ;111d hf_' (:on,p1(1tc'd on of 1il'"fed', ~~L ;iii?ll1l,eT: t, t "}i l 1'';' ~ ~1"(1('1":1 C'ntCl'C,d C!ll L1+~t:o1.1t;!' ~~J, ~ Q'~}S, flit: ♦~Lil' ~l:~t.l(1!: ('11;1(`(1 L11C t.i~';C: ilI:C1CSl' ' 1', 11.7 1't. i i,tlf=:.l lIC' I Cil]"~I" til" E ''C I"('l 10 i i ?i'tc:11 c:l"1;1]. l Lo o'1 or 1)t)f.oro ~(Dptt'Islt:,e; 1, _ U, i i j ' ;,lll_r 1,C'L nI,t`J 1 ,.,tlt.li 1711 19,;6, i Dal1l i i and h11 have .act.1V('ly an(.i (11 l..l'wnt.IV purl;110. 1 i i 1 i corlstrl.lci:iol., of the pr.ojc:ct and have accompli;hod the following actions which c0rl:it.i.tut0 good ccluse for failure, to timely commence and complete the project: 1, Draft contracts woi_e received from the U. S. „ Corps of Engineers in 1975 .1nd nocroti~iti.ons began at that a h time. 2, On February 23, 1.976, the City Council of Dallas a adopted a resolution suspending fur:t.her capital improvements in any way beneficial t:o the city's customer cities until s the rate dispute betwoen Dallas and certain cu,Storaer cities was resolved. 3. The City of Frisco C.il.ed suit agai_n:rt Uo Texas Water Conunission upon th(,Ar Sopu.,inb r 1, 1976 issuance of permits for Aubrey Resor.voi.r to tht--% Cities of Dallas and Denton. I On truly 5, 1979, the pc):mits were !;uM,ained by the I Tex; js Su}:>rclltc CoUl't' rc: f 11S,1l of. I?] J cat, ioII ;*or 1•.rit of i 1 . error in Cit:y oi' Fr.iscc) V. I(xa.,j ti';atrr Canani:;.;aon_,_rt__tl., i an appeal. from Lhe> Colnmi: s,.r,n , o.rd:•r.; Irailt.inq the pormits. 5. Ou or Jbout Ts1.1gm-,t 23, 109the I:i1111%l ti Rafe Caso } :iuh,;tani_ial 6. OI1 or abt)ut :i(`i)tr:Gli:,l!t' 19111, I1Cll.lCk:; mid I)(.'111',C)ll } k authorized U,,1114, Inc. to prepare n ;•:i.11ancial PeasihiIi ty I i Study foi- tho Aubrey Cant :ind Rot;ervoir ['roj, c:t. ;:c:go ictt,ions t i ' with tho U. S. Corps of f.nginoors a.ltio r.osumed at this tune. / I t 7. On d<wrnk'r~or 9, 1979, llnl.l•-)s a1,O Dc)tt.on received Ravi ctd !)r;ls:t c4rat.._1 Sull;t lei Itc crc ai_ic n t.l Contracts from 1 ~ the t S. C:or'}>s, of t;rlCjl.lle(31':r: nliCf 1 1.1:-11. CO11t:Y('.Ct 11(!(IOt).zit1.Un5 k 1,iorc undo i t.tkr.n. r' ? ;_2, t'>~r,t), 1.:, . ~ . .:i l c I)r.ncon ~ i , i allt:hUri'LE'.Ci Li)'.' ln~:)1:'Y. I:U •.'!kt('1' I;~t,••~;•'-l",)C;i:;' ',•r}th ail,.' t~. 1 I, Col. 1):I C,f I1'iC;il',eCr:. 1' ;111! ~ ~ 1 (•hr;i;]UCio Cif V i } i.;lcl.k IICgf )I i I[. iu1',. rr l~l. ,7 SIIU.,' l ll, . i tIlc l.IYFiQ, I nc , r I_n-i:tL, a I i :,i 111.1 1 i. 11 t:U~l" 11`1' t it! /llii.`Yl'`• I E'to I i i , i , L 10. On Jonuar.y 301.180, the City Council of Da.llaa r authorized the City Mana(le): to execute Contracts with the U. S. Corps of Engineers after colnp.letion of final negotiations a i; on these contracts. i ~r[r■`{ 11. On March 28, 19'80, Dallas and Denton met with the r U. S. Corps of Enginecrs to [i.nalize the contracts in order for the C(.)rZls to forward the saline to t.l-le Offi.CCI of t.hc Ch.i.c_f I, Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of. Engineers, for. &pproval. i 12. 01-1 April 1., 15180, a delog,li_i.on from Dallas and Denton met with U: S. Sionate and Ilow3e of Representativos r subcornmitteo".s to re.cluest that. additional funding for the 4 Aubrey Project be includod in the 1981 Fedoral. Budgot. IN. Dallas and Denton are continuinq every effort within ~ their, a;l: ilities Lo movel forward wi Lh the U. S. Corps of i Engineers to secure COfilllic'11CC'ilent of. construction or the r Aubrey t!rojc:ct, AL t.h.i.r; tame!, the c.it.i.e ; alnd the fort Wortit District. of the Cor.pr3 Of Erik i.rtccr!; r)rc iLwa.i.ti.n(l contract approval by Lho, Of ico of t:.ia Chile'( 1-:11yineo tin(l rilllJllla.ri'ua.C)Il Contracts l:: Cl t11e ;i(!t Ji:tar'1' of: LilE7 l~1:1SP;' for finiil. of the cip;)):oval.. tllY:>11 r.inal. .,pp:-oval. I);, (,'r l ; Cl1ltl :'.11111).11C)l. C'(')IIt3:.,Ct.;i 1.)y t.1 0 I'(:11:1,. (.>I' r', Cif il(11.I1C:i;1:!3 r i!i)Cl L'1 ! S 0CA:'U'tLAf:')' Of tI1C' 11")i''l, on ;i'r1C1 :.N1 ti Oil l C'C011 l!!71IiTiICI1't('<~'. i!,~:' ('('.Yt' lv(r.'III :'.i1LlYl'iC!0 1'S 1 :11:.1 ii.':iill 1. ;:I1i1. 1•:] i Col1'l •!li'_'C' Uii O ' C.-bou t 01.,! 19 (1 c:m l_. i'r L.,.i.l. i 1.1.1 ) 1' 1 .'jU t.ha t. Chi' I for :c C•!..:.'f;;C`iiL G' C2"CiC't.lon y 7 3 3' 1 / it ( 131 fj'! 11;i11')l!r 1, 11182 , Et;l',i r c 1:111'1c t.inil tC) t 'ilU!'r l i l11)1 i? 1 ~-i OF hiiI,Lr1`i ~ f l 1 Gf C./ l -77 SPATE Of TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS r Sworn and subscribed to before me this (lily of tl 1 ' CITY OF DALIAS Not Tiry 1?ub.lic ~;i and orr x LEE E, HOLT City !Attorney BY /1 _ - - - `TAiTr tant City Attonlu CITY OF DENTON i r City Manager E ~ ~ t i i STATE OF '!'EMS ! COUNTY OF DENTON ~ EE ' i Sworn an subscribed to before me thi:, day of , r ; Nortcirv Public in and fo): DeI.}.o;, County, xas E k I I ~ i • i 3 i a i a i ; E , i i i 1 + IN THE MATTER OF THE § BFFORE TINT APPLICATION OF THE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION 4 C;; TX C) DNt~ o'OR t/ § ~i AN EX'z.r:Nsxoia of TIME CONSTRUC'T'ION TO COMMENCE OF THE PROJECT AUTHORIZED BY PERMI'T' X3312 PLEADING OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR I TO THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF "'HE COMMISSION: irector of the Texas ' COMES NOW the Executive Ds Department ~ files this pleading relating to the of Water Resources, and I 1 referenced matter: E I. ; s too. 33].1, 7980 and 1-106A relate j 3312 and Permit Permit No. ► a U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to the Aubrey Project, . the Elm Fork of the Trinity , proposal which includes a dam on to pound 591,709 River in Denton County. The reservoir will impound acre--foet under Permit No. 3311, and of which Denton is f ' 207,896 acre-feet under Permit No. authorized to impound 207, ject also involves converting 182,900 . The Aubrey Pro 3312 f ~ acre-feet of flood storage in Lewisville Lake to conservation with the flood storage to be placed in the Aubrey ,,forager ranted 1.34,976 acre--feet of this reservoir . Dallas is-granted pursuant additional conservation storage in Lewisville Lake F' to Permit No. 798C. Denton is author.ived 47,424 acre-feet of this conservation storage under Permit No. 1706A. Denison local sponsors of the Aubrey and Dallas were both named with , project to negotiate .with the U. S. Corps of Engineers, i ge and percent of conservation stora I Dallas to receive 74 ; I cent of conservation storage. with Denton to receive 26 per i a 1 i i J ~ i 1 The four permits or amendments to permits were issued on c~ l September 11 1976, with requirements that each permittee commence !r ,1 ~s construction within two years and complete construction within five years. By Coirunission orders of October 23, 1978, the times to commence and complete the construction authorized by these four permits were extended to September. 1, 1980, and September. 1983, respectively. The Permittees have submitted a joint application for an extension of time to commence and complete (,onstruction of the projects authorized by Permit No. 3311, No. 98C;, Xo. 3312 and f. No, 170611. A copy of the application is attached. T a. mi ttees ` seek two year extensions for commencement, to September 1, 1982, I and three year extensions for completion, to September 1, 1.986. E The proposed commencement date is more than four years from the 1 { date of issuance of the permit, while the proposed completion date I. j ` is five years from the proposed elate of completion required in [ f the original permit. r IT. R R} Applicants have pa.i,d what the 13xecutive Director considers to be the proper fees, that is $1000.00 per permit- for j which an extension is sought, as required by Board Mule 156. 04. 25. 002. The application is sufficiont for' filing. Applicants have, however, paid the total of $4,000.00 under protest, asserting that the fee required. should be only $1,000 total, since this is a joint :application. They claim that. Section 1.1..195, I Texas Water Code, authorizes the Board to collect a c1axi.mua7 1°ee of $1,000,00 to extend the time to construct a "reservoir." ' The fact th,3t the storage and use rights to the Aubrey project ~ E are granted in four separate permits is immaterial, they claim, l since only one project is authorized. The Sxecutive Director, asserts the $4,000,00 free is proper. I i s I i Section 11,145, Texas Water Code, provides., (b) If the permit contemplates construction of a storage reservoir, construction shall begin within the time fixed by the commission, not to exceed two years after the date the permit is issued. t The commission, by entering an order of record, may extend the time for beginning construction. the board may fix fees, not, to exceed $1,000, far extending the time to begin construction of reservoirs. a This section contemplates extension of provisions in a )permit .issued by the Commission. Pour permits are at issue here, not one. Rule 156.04.25.002 provides in part: If the date of proposed commencement of construction is more than four years from the date of issuance of the 2e1mit, notice and hearing in the manner of a new application for a permit will be required. Otherwise, no, such notice is required. If notice and hearing in the manner of a new application for, a perm.i:t is reclu.ired, the applicant shall pay fees not to exceed $1,000 apportioned as follows: i (1) filing and recording fees as stated in these rules; (2) any required mailing fees; and { (3) extension fee of 50 cents per acre-foot: { of storage. The rule clearly requires up to $1,000.00 fee per )ermit. E Filing fees, notice fees and extensions arc, listed as applicable l to each permit, not to each project, Since notice and hearing are to be "in the manner of. a new application for o permit," it follows that Department rules and policy regarding payment: of permit fees would be followed. And the Department consistently has required separate fees for each application. Purtherinore, we are dealing here with four separate clauses a,hich require extensions. The $4,000.00 lace should, therefore, be recognized as the required fee. III. Applicants have diligently pursued the above pormi.ts, as i i evidenced by the n=zrrat.ive account of negotitnt•ions with the Corps of Engineers appearing in their joint application. IV. The Executive Director recommends tile following: A. Pursuant to Rule 156. 04. 25, 002: and .003, the application i f ; be filed and set for hearing; B.' The Commission rule that the fees paid by applicants, that i, is $1,000.00, are the correct fees as required by tale Texas Slater } Code and the Hoard rules; 1 C, Upon final hearing, the application for extension of time ? t be granted in accordance with the terms of the attached draft: 1 { order so that applicants will have until September 1, 1982 to commence construction; and until September 1, 1.986 to complete construction under. Permits No. 3311, No. 798C, 140. 3312, and No. 1706A. # TI3XAS DL1'ARTMLN`i' OF WATER R1?130I;'RCLS Harvey Davis Executive Director ? { A. Richardson ~ Director, PCIrMits Division M. Reginald Arnold 11 nsel Ca U General Suzanne yy°3chwartz Staff 1\U, orney P. U. Box 13087 Austin, Texas 7871.1 I i { 1 M I t f CERTIFICATE Or SERVICE Z certi.fy that a copy of this pleading ) has been mailed, ?i t1 properly stamped and addressed, this the day of March, 1981, to: b City of Denton Municipal. Building Denton, Texas 76201 Mr, Frank R. Booth Booth, Lloyd and Simmons 302 San Jacinto Building y Austin, Texas '78701 and that a copy has been sent by interoffice mail to Mr. Sack Cox, Public Interest Advocate, Texas Department Of Water Resources / i ~i. 1 { I i ; t r { i i i i t I I i A i i G. M"PARTNIFNT OF wn r! it it~ac%"''tc~a ~f 51511 l~ h ' II ~ FYY• • e ~ a l.~ AN ORDER extending the time for f' City of Denton to commence and complete con•- struction of the project authorized by Permit No. 3312. { On came on to be considered before the Texas Water Commission the application of City of Denton 1 seeking a two-year extension of time to commence construction of the project: authorized by P(:rmit: No. 3312, and a three.-year ex-- tension of time to complete said construction. After considering the application and mat.Lers thereto ):elated, the Commission is of the opinion that the applicaLion is reasonable ' and should he granted. NOW, `1'liEl2EFORE, BE IT ORDERED BY THE TEXAS 1 AIPFR COf MT.SSION thaL City of Denton shall. commr.ce construction or installation of all works authorized by Permit No. 3312 by Soptember 1, 1982, and complete the project by September 1, 1986. All other germs and conditions contained in Porm.it No. 3312 j which are not specifically contrary to the terms of this order shall remain in full. force and effect. ExecuLed and enLered of record, this the Ti "'Mr; WATI'R COMMISSION P`e1.ix~tk~Dc~iiald, Cliair•mar._LL---~~___-- ATTEST: Dorsey B. liar:d(MUl h, C010iissionor TSar,y Ann }Ic.-:nerd- -Chief Clork d 9 s i , Y ' 1 , } `T'exas Depa tit entaof YWater Resources tr~•t•tawr•~~tct: >`tr,n-u~itnn~t~uNt } To Texas Water Commission OATS: January 2, 1981 THRU Directorrmits Division F FROM : Water Use Section SUBJECT: Joint Application for extension of tine to corm once construction of the Proposed U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Aubrey Lake and Lewisville Lake Enlargement City of Dallas with 74 Percent P-33'11 (A-3527) Aubrey Lake A P-798C A-834C Lewisville Lake Enlargement City of Denton with 26 Percent P-3312 (A-3528) Aubrey Lake P-1706A (A-1590A) Lewisville Lake Enlargement r A joint application for an extension of time in which to core-~)ncu and complete donstruction on the proposed Aubrey Project was receives! August 19, 1980. The current conrn:ncement and completion dates are September 1, 1980 and September 1, i 1983. r The Aubrey Project, a U,S. Amy Corps of Engineers proposal includes a daill on Elm Fork trinity River isr Iknton County impounding 799,600 acre-feet of con- servation storage space, and the convcrsion of 182,400 acre-feet, of flood cities of storage space in Lewisville lal;e to conshrvation storage space, The Dallas and Denton are the designated local sponsors of the project with 711 and 1 26 percent of the tonservot•iocr space respectively. Permit. Nos. 3311 (Dar gas) and 3312 (Denton) authorize the two cities to impound 591,704 acre-feet (74.14) addition, l. r~~,rt llns, 19L(. (C?allas) • r In a~ J and 201',80.6 acre-feet (26X) respectively. and 1706A (Denton) authorize the cities an rdditional inipoundin(„ copacit.y in f Lewisville Lal,e in the amount of 134,976 acre-sect (147) and 47,4?11 acre-ir:et (26%) respectively. These form permits were issu,- on `ici?ternber 1, 1976 with requiren-cnts that each permittee cowonce const1^rrctio11 rfitirin t%rn yr`c,rs anti j complete construction within 5 years. By Cnrmrission orders of October 23, 1978 the times co cocai).-nce and complete tl- corrstruction authorized by these form permits c•,as extended to Sep, .o?,ibur 1, lgfil k and September 1, 1983 respectively. Thu. subject application is for a No-year ext.ersion of the cony !ncen~^nt date and i a three-year extensicfr of the completion date. According to the extension re- quest, the project is awaiting contract approval by the Office of the Chief Engineer, U.S. Arpin Corps of Engineers and submission of the contracts to the f r I .1~nu.try l~~ul Pkento to the Cos,ronission t thr,t u~,un , The reduc ,t frrrth~;r insJic•3LE.. ;ecrE,tary of the 'r',rsu1, for final apProv rl . tile AriRy c}ti eer9r,tandutheoSccretatyfoflttYre Army, fittnl apprnv~r'I by the ,ecr~etarleo Corps C'rfies of Galla R s as7sJ Denton, tt construction ind land acquisition can con Yrr nee. c>I~orkedly, the Corps of i.ng7nectrs expected to eoont>nnc.a land acquisition on about October 1, 19BO. s. hJaximuss+ fees ($4000.00 or $1000.00 for each permit) as r+:gtstrecl by t',o:rrd Mule 156.04.25.0112 have been raid, By letter dated Moveml)er 18, '19'x:1 Fermi ttee l s t Attorney has submitted required i000,00(fis allftltafteis; req{,ir,r,dd 1)• Ithet4iater `Code o `a tending that a maximum fen and Board kules. r.. r,hould b, Set for public hoarincd Pursuant, to bo~rtd Rule 156.04.?`i.002,,Jthi~zi'theealrt?lic,tiicnt i~ ~Irtu+iacJ, it .s to consider the time extension rc.c,ues . reconimodod that the tis:r. to collim."TI(c Iructiof.'t.~rt. Iho 1`ir)ur~u r{sra>34tedcon- n:;6 [aru (Ind ( September 3 , n ) m(years is rr:gc~e,;ted or to ,Eit , (or r~, r sJtruct.Ion be extended three yoars a,; r•cgw'tc,d I I 3vrry G. Boyd 1 s } r,C; C'uiiiic IniErW Advc:.:,,.i } Dam Safety Unit i i i I t C i t j i i i BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS I A PROI'ESS101dAL CONPOHAl ION 902 SAN JAONTO BUILDING OTH 8 SAN JACINTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 76701 512-478.41500 WATER USE PCF611I3 FRANK R. BOOTH REGEIVFD I ROBERT H. LLOYD t~ LUTCHER B. SIMK40NS PAUL G. GOSSELINK SKIP NEWSOM S PATRICK W.LINDNF.R August 18, 1980 f Mr. Harvey Davis Executive Director Texas Department of Water Resources P. 0. Box 13087 I Capitol Station Austin, Texas 178711 j Re: Application for cxtensian of time to conunrncr i7 and complete construction, Aubrey Reservoir project, Permit Nos. 799-C, 3311, 1706-A and 3312 Dear. Mr, Davis: Enclosed i s t),(, joint cjpp-licaLion of thce cities, of Dallas and Denton for extension of l1.11ue to coltuilence and complete construction under the pores is authorizing the Aubrey Reservoir Project. Also enclosed area two chocks, totalling $1,000.00 for ' filing fees, $762.20 from Dallas and $237.80 from Denison. Vary truly yottr,s, i ~ % ~/J rr4/ I / i P'lw/ms Frank R. Booth Enclosures cc: W/o enclos;uros: Carroll Graham Chris Hartung I I1 1 III i i t t ~ 1 1 I I r r r f APPLICATION FOR EXTENS1014 § + OF TIME TO COMIVNCE AND § BEFORL THE t COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF g - AUBREY DAM AND R1 SERVOIR § TEXAS WATER COAImISSION PROJECT UNDER PERMIT NOS. § i 798-C, 3311, 1706-A AND r 12 § IN AUSTIN, TEXAS APPLICATION 01- CITIES or DALLM; AND DENTON FOR F EXTENSJON OF TI1''Ir TO COMMENCH AND COMPLETE E CONSTRUCTION Or AUBREY DAM ANT) RESERVOIR PR0.7EC11' TO THE HONORABLE TEXAS WATER C014M I S S I ON : NOW COME the Cities of Dallas and Denton an() file this joint application for an extension of time to commonce and i complete construction of tho U. S. A1'my Corp, of Engineers' 3 Aubrey Dam and Reservoir Project pursuant. to Dal1a5' Permit Nos. 798-C and 3311 and Denton's Permit Nos. 1706••A an"d r R 3312, arid in suI)Port thereof would show the Commission the foIlowinq: Applicant: City of Dallas is rwootiatinr3 c.onei'a(,,ts with the U, S, Cor): l of . li,ndinccrs to obCain 71;• of chc: 1-'roje.ct' conserv!ti.on stor,lc3c) and to repay '7. 1 of t he 1(aca 1. cost of the 1pr.oxject. Denton is nogotiating contrac,,'; with f tho U. S. C'.;+:3i;• of Rnir ~ inr.ers to oht:ai ll ?G: of (Jr, rc!j<lc; (C; j Cwl.,;orvot toll f.(?:'i! Jl' i!IlC1 ti; Y(,pa}' I',1'tl" i(il';13 CC);it of t1lc.' 3;rC1]41cf- hi.'i'ltilt: NOS, -1.118--": , ~ 11 , 1711G-k, ill'',1 •;:;1 respectivo,t\' 49L'ro i isllk2d t•:) Oalj;ls "110 Dontcn (w.. bcl,; erilbor P ~ 1, 1976. I:M'11 1)(ifmit 1-ecJ(11red crnst.ruc.t:.ioll of thc.> Aubrc~} Project f to commonce on o): before: Sept:ombor 1, 1.976, and bo completed f ~ olt or before ;>hptombel' 1, 1~t31, 13'r orders ontcrec? C',n i I October 25, 1976, the Coiwi.is!: ion extcnc?oc: the I aru: under i ~ cash perwit to rc:,Illire C.'on;;trllC."tion of the 1:1'Ojc.'ct to ro11r:-.0rlCQ I on Ur .:fort sc ptc.llbc.l l , 1980, <lnd to 17E? comllletecl on or ! beforo Soptc.11111)01: 1, 198?. j 4 1lI, t 1 Sinca1 1.11 pc,,i:miAs were iss ed e1)teTi'3 i`1' t 1')ry~i N,71.1las and Oc'nton ilCtivoly .inr'. <?;.Iiclurll]}' Ir:nle<1 i r f n P construction of the project and have accomplished the following actions which constituter clood cause Eor failure to ?i timely cotruslence and complete the project: 1. Draft contracts we re received front the U. S. Corps of. Lr,ginc:er.s in 1975 and negotiations began at that time. 6 • 2. On February 23, 1976, the City Council of Dallas adopted a resolution suspending further capital improvements lr i qI in any way beneficial to the city's customer cities until 'J } the xate dispute between Dallas and certain customer c.i.ties. ~I was resolved. ' 3. The City of Frisco filed suit agalhist the Texas Witter Commission upon their September 1, 1976 issuance of E permits for. Aubrey Reservoir to the Cities of Dallas and 1 Dc;nt:on. 4. ur, July 5, 1979, the porn'I.i.tas wero si,sta.iiwd by the Texas 'Suprome Court's r.rfusa3 of a,pplic it.ion fox- i,'ri t: of f r' error i1-1 C i V of I i iscc, v.' Tux as 116 r1c r Cc)nun•o ^,xon,otai_. , r an al)pea.l from the Conullins.ion s o dor" q)..lntinq the p("rnl.t... 5. On or about: Auciust. 231 3.979, the I?.Zl.l.rts R:!te Case was ssc'tt.lod .111 sul)'tantlial part. 6. On or about Soj)Lember 5, 1979, and Denton authorized 1.1 PW, Inc. to prepare a V' nancicil Peasility Study for the Aubrey Dam and Rc::k'rvoir PvoJect.. :"Cgot.i.atAons I with Hio U. Corps, ol. Fn(.1ineers ;.lsn r'_,'t:nucl ,t tl,i:, Lime. 7. On November 9, 1979, Dallas and Denton rcceivecl ,,cf:s frolli Revi.!:;ed Ur~lil: l~atr.r Supl~.iy and RccroilLinn, Con 1: r i t'ho U. S. Corps of hnq.irloer;, .And fin;,. colltr,,ct nt""ot.iat.i.ons we rc unc ori.a;'on. 1 6. oil J<,:ir1F,r"i '2' 1~ 0' :I"' l Lt' L,i`.Cl } I11_'11t I: I I f i MILhOl'i the In<- vor to or i"".C' Cot l?:: of I.l.if ).nuc'1':; ! Cr' ,'.lll..l'I" I final IleijoLj.atio!::' t?I1 ' t). (`1'. ~f~lhlri'tr:'1' [3, l~/l~i)1 D<73L1`~ atlfl iil'1:'.''`El .'lC(:l:l)t.~_'.C? r i il'i1i r~:~t h): thI:- Lttil'14, lnl.. , P: now, ial Poa. is u'I c c: L . i i I i 10. On January 30, 1980, the City Council. of Dallas authorized t}lc City Manager: to (:xecutc contracts with the U. S. Corps of Engineers after comploti.on of final negotiations on these contracts. 11. On March 28, 19,10, Dallrl?; anal Denton met with the } U. S. Corps of Engineers to finalize the contracts iii orclor for the Corps to forward the, same to the Office of the Chief . At Engineer, U. S. Army ('ores of Engineers for approval. 12. On April 11 1980, a delegation from Dallas and Denton met with U. S. Senate and House of Representatives subcommittees to request that addit:ional funding for the Aubrey Project be included in tire 1.981 Federal Budget. IV. / Dallas and Denton are continuing rwoi.y effort within their abilities to move forward witli the U. S. Corps of t Engineers to secure callunc:ncclltent: of construction of the ! I' Aubrey Project. At thi!7 tile, the c,i.ties and the fort Worth { District of the Cl)r1?f3 Of l;ll(jiJl(.'•l'l'`; ilr(! a4lit.i.tl.Il('1 (70111: 1;acl: approval by the Of:Cicr_ of the, Chief Eliyine(UI: alld su'.~nu.!!'.i_on of the contracts to the ,;ocly:t:,arv of thr. Arms for final. i1jJl'llUb'il),, Upon f J.11ii1 11)1IYOMV ll lad' ('11w }iiwvotarV Of thrik, , s If Exi ( i. 10 e r s k i. l) ~ ' argil of c~)ntr~,ct.,, 1.}l, ;~:'o Cj o Co r and tll(; i(:( l'l't ll",` C11 Hw Y-nny, (:O!l:;tl'llcl..loll olld lllrnl aC(,Lli! ition Call (IDIM11Crice Th(' Port 1Io)'th DiL"t).icl. Of the corl~-. of coiit(.'ll p late- land rac(]ui s i. t orl will co!1l11'!l1C(' oll oi: r "Ihout Oct.ob) -r 1, 1980. t•Jl!1;1ZM ORE, 011 Applicants r',,siwct'fu 1. l y rtxluc:.it that. the L Coi11111issloll cxtond t110 '..)I!1e6, for Colll1willcewent: of coils tructioll { ll;ldt:'r P@rlliit N013, 1'9'-(') 3"'111 l/V1!)'i'. ;lnd 3312 to SCpt).7111b!'r y r 1, 1(932, L111d x01 (nuut,l('Lic'!1 t,C1 Fri tc'!'ll.(r 19£3G. ctIully subi'littud, ~I CITY 01' I,AI !,AS } 1 i 1 , j STATE OF TEXAS § i COUNTY" OF' DALLAS ~ t' Sworn and subscribed to before me this day of t tiL7 1950. 3 f'! CITY Of DALLAS No.L:aryrPubli.c in and fo.r--___ 4 e11as county, Texas i LEE E. HOLT, City Attorney OY; _ r'Flssistant City Attomey CITY OF DENTON k3l City Manages: ~ I STATE OF TEXAS § [ CCUNTY OF DE14TON ti I / Y a~ I Swo~,n anp subscribcr3 to beforc, ;;fc tlli.s clay c) f c 1980. IJ0 ~t`i1,% ! iyu )Iic in '-end for . Den Lo n Comity, Texas ~ I 1 1 j it i f I. I 1 , , I 1 [ 1 f~I j LAW of FICF.5 BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 302 SAN JACINTO BUILDING J•fH & SAN JACINTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 FRANK R, BOOTH 512-478•9506 ROBERT H. LLOYD April 10, 1981 LUTCHER B. SIMMONS PAUL G. OOSSELINK SKIP NEWSOM I, ? PATRICK W. LINDNER DR ENT W. RYAN i i Publi 1 I Denton ecord C'hron9.cal. P.O. o° 369 Dent n, Texas 76201 RE: C:i.ty of Denton Permit Application Nos. 3312 and 1706A Gentlemen: Enclosed are two separate notices for publication in your newspaper. TheaQlve the city of Denton's water permits in ~the Aubrey Reservoir ect . Please publish cac 11A ce--at your lowest commercial ; rate two times. The tiirst publication must occur during the week beginning April 27, 1981. The second publication must occur no sooner than seven days following the first publication and no later than 13 days fallowing the first publication. For example, if the first publication is on Monday, April 27, publish the second time on Monday, May 4. When publication is completed, fill in the affidavit i attached to each notice and return to me with your bill.. f I' lie will promptly pay the bill, Very truly yours, + I I Frank R. Booth FRD/nlm enclosures CC:. W/enClOSUreS: ) Chris xartunq ✓ APR 18 ]9..81 Bob Nelson i ^rrV IF DENTON i M V d Of WATT-',it RI'.SOUft k1~~t1 llf ~~il~ ~Ull~~~flJlll~~~ x/ 6 w r i 4.\}ark OF HEAP ING NOTICE E 8331'ORr `TIiE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION OF AN A?PL,ICA''ION 1110 14X`1'END THE TIME TO COMMENCE; AND COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION UNDER i?ERh1I'!' NO. 3312 I Notice is given that CITY OF DEN'TON } Municipal Building Denton, Texas '16201 j olo crank R. Booth } Booth, Lloyd and Simmons 342 San Jacinto Building Austin, Texas 78701. to §11.145 , 'T'exas Water Code, a applicant, pursuant nd Rule 156. p 04.25.001--.003, seeks to extend from September 1, 1984, to Se tem- I Is 1.9$2, the time for commencement of constr.ucti.an of Aubrey ber 1 Pert o. 3312. ey Reir Reservoir authorized underfcetmof ConseivatioAtlbtoragesonvtile T;lm will impound 799,600 ac ;,n Cooke, Denton and 'T'rinity 12iver Basin iz to j Fork, Prini.ty River, Grayson Counties, of which the falce~tOeeks tatextenddthe impound 207,896 acre-Feet. Applicant time for completion of con'tlmoreofully mset3~oultlain the la8plica- 5eptcmber 1, 1.986, all be ~ j tion. permit was issued on September 1, 1976, and originally The and to be e uired construction to continence on September 1, 1978, t cam letecl on September 1., 1981, By order of October 23, 1978, the and ` thepC°mmission extended the times o colunoncetandcmber 1., 198complete0, construction authorized by this perm September 1, 1983, respectively. The application for an extension of time for Permit No. 3312 hearing was filed on April. 6, Stephen , and. ~3 the Conunission in the Austin ta}te IOf: ire lBuildhngdabty Texas, on May ?.1, 1.981, at ' shalwhol ! uinte_nds to offer prepared testi~- 14 o'clock a Any I profile the testimony with the i moray1700atNorth the public Congress s hearing person Chief Clerk of the Commission not ess pren fivetdays prior tthe the hearing, and shall, serve copies applicant, the Executive Director and Public Inter sonsdwhoatc of the Department. of Water Resour.ces and all. other p have eig filed written to protests or written Commission may author.3ize thelalate days prior to the hearing. tiling of prepared testimony upon a7 showing of good cause and C extenuating circumstances. Any protest es t t written receive prepared testimony shall file a written I ~ri.to the with the, Commission not, less than eight days 1 request hearing. Tlaot;e opposing the granting of this application may appear at the hei r.inq and/or, not loss than eight days before the hearing date, may file written protests with the Commission and serveto provided copies on the applicant With proof shallec;ontai nothc name and the commission. Written p. address of the protestant, an identification io , tl.e pending application, the basis of protestant if applicable and protest:ant's diversion point(s) or property, any amendments or adjustments to the appl.i.catiora which would result: in a withdrawal of tha protest. The written protest Will be noted by the Conuniss.ion but will. not be considered as evidence Since the r tght to c1'o`is-'examine is iab:;unt:. No 1 r r r r be admitted as a party to the proceeding unless the protestant s complies with Commission Rule .155.04.00.001 which requires a i justiciable interest and actual or representative presence at the hearing. Due to the technical nature of the hearing, it maybe g advisable for the protestant to have an expert witness, such as an engineer, available at the hearing, persons desiring further ' ?Information in connection with this application may contact Suzanne Schwartz, P. 0, fox 13087, Capitol Station, Austin, 'T'exas .:r.' 18711. r /s/ Mary Ann fief ner J Mary Ann Hefner, Chief Clerk TEXAS WATER COMMISSION a j Date: April 9, 1981 { J i i p t{ ~ ;I i _ i 1 r f f t ~ j 1 { f i I h f i 44 1 ' I r 1 I TEXAS U`ARTNIE V•T 01" WATI'R KFsOURCP",,, t TUM WAIN! (11MllSlTIN h t NO'T'ICE OF HEARING BEFORE THE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION OF AN APPLICATION vo LxT.END THE TIME TO COMMENCB, AND COMPIJETE CONSTRIJC'I'TON UNDER PER1,911.r` NO. 1706A l f Notice is given that CITY OF DENTON Municipal Building . F Denton, Texas 76201 c/o Frank R. Booth Booth, Lloyd and Simmons 302 San Jacinto Building d Austin, 'T'exas 78701 applicant, pux•suant to 511.145, 'Texas Water Code, and Rule 156.09 ' .25,001-.003, seeks to extend from September 1, 1950, to Septem- ber 1, 1962, the time for commencement of construction authorized under Pe., At No. 1706A, which allows conversion of 47t424 acre- feet of flood storage to conservation storage in Lewisville Lake on the Elm Fork, Trinity River., Trinity River Basin in Denton j. County. Applicant also seeks to extend the time for completion s of construction from September 1, 1983, to September 1, 1986, all being more fully set out in the application. 5 The permit was issued on September. 1, 1976, and originally required construction to commence-: on September 11 1978, and to tie i completed on September 1, 1981. By order of October 23, 1978, the Commission extended the times to commence and complete the construction authorized by this per.m.it to September 1, 1980, and September 11 1983, resplectivoly. The application for an extension of. time for Permit No. 1706A was filed on April 6, 1981, and a hearing thereon will be held by the Commission in the. Stephen F. Austin State Office t Building at 1.700 North Congress Avenue in Austin, Texas, on May 21, 1961, at 10 o l rJock a.m. Any person who intends to offer prepared testimony at the public hearing shall prefile Lhe testimony with the Chief Clerk of the. Commission not less than five days prior to the hearing, and shall serve copies of pre- pared testimony on the applicant, the Executive Director and Public Interest Advocate of the Depart:menL• of Water Resources and all other persons wro have filed written protests or written requests not less than eight days prior to the hearing. The Commission may authorize the late filing of prepared testimony upon a showing of good cause and extenuating Circurnstances. Any person who desires to receive prepared testimony shall file a f written protest: or a written request wi.t,.h the Commission not less than eight days px.•.ior to the hearing. ' Those opposing the granting of this application may appear at the hearing and/or, not less than eight days before the hearing date, may file wr. i Lten protests k.h the Commission and serve copies on the applicant with proof of servicr_> to be provided to the Commission. Written protests shall contain the name and j address of the protestant, an identification of the pending application, the basis of prot.estant's interest, location of protestant's diversion point(s) or property, if applicable and any amendments or adjustments to the application which would result in a withdrawal of the protest. The written protest will k' be noted by the Commission but will. not be considered as evidence since the right: to cross--examine is absent-.. No protestant will be admitted as a party to the proceeding unless the protestant complies with Commission Rule 155.04.00.001 which requires a jLIStlCiablO interest and actual or re )rosentat.ive ~ pre,c I1Ce at the Due to the technical nature of the Bearing, it may be hearing. advisable for the protestant to have an expert witness, such as Persons desi.ris~g further: { an enginecrr, available at the hearing. terson may contact information in Connection with this app. ~ Suzanne Schwartz, P. 0. Box 1.3087, Capitol. Static Austin,, TC.Xas 7 s ~r 11. , i /s/ Mary Ann Hefner Mary Arm Hefner, Chief Clerk P'%XAS wA'PRR COMMISSION Date: April 9, 1981 _E. E I { 1 i I E I l ~l 1 r i j NAY 11981 x DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ZfK FORT WORTH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P. O. BOX 17300 v FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76102 REPLY TO f - A9TENTION Ofs I 15 April 1981 SWFED-DC Ne, to Mr. Thomas E.,Tlaylor, Director r Dallas Wa r Utilities City 1 Dallas, Texas 75201 i Dear Tom: office- Inclosed are the conference notes on the 15 January 1981, meeting at your office. } hig PXeaa@aiai$ the, ox giricl and forward to Bq(,.helaon far.,~i6nature pnd' ► s;.,y s, We will duplicate copies when completed and furnish to you, retu n. ~0R ~ l~~a ,C Bob and Jim,gell of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. ' Sincerely, s 1 Incl WARA, P.E. As stated Cie , Engineering Division or Duey re,VIgw'~ na in S e ) k n a s J h 1. 1 SAIL Rouv 7D 4 A 15 F 10 OEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FORT WORTH DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P. O. BOX 17300 FORT WORTH. TEXAS 76102 REPLY TO ATTCNTION OFC SWFED-DC 15 April 1981 6 Mr. Thomas E. aylor, Director Dllas Wa Utilities ~ City Da s, Texas 75201 j i j Dear Tom: Inclosed are the conference notes on the 15 January 1981, meeting at your office. Please sign the original and forward to Bob nelson for his signature and his return; to us. We will duplicate copies when completed and furnish to you, s Bob and Jim Bell of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Sincerely, 1 E j 1 Inch~J As stated 4ie Engineering Division i 6, f V Dl t.,~ V !dot r 1 O1 I~ G~ 7 -~'`e- , Y~ f e !/iewc,of i 1/ J V Ml L I knit m 4RI5 i TALCEN• _ ' Fa use of NO Imm, ►•o AR 340.15, tho plopan•nl oo►ncy It 'KEPYRENCE OR OFFICE SYMBOL Si. B)E CT i ~ SWFED-DC Conference Notes - Ray Roberto Lake TO SEE DISTRIBUTION 'FROM SWFED-D~T ~A DATE 15 Apr 81 C.LAT I Mr. Losornio/dk/2317 1. A meeting was held it the Dallas City Hall on 15 Jan 81 to d1scuss recreation at Ray Roberts Lake with representative of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, the r Cities of Dallas and Denton, and Fort Worth District Corps of Engineers present. The attendees were: J ' City of Denton City of Dallas I' Chris Hartung, City Manager Tom Taylor, Utilities Director I Clarence Warnstaff, Planning Dept f Bob Nelson, Utilities Director I Steve Brinkman, Parks & lti;creatinn Larry McDaniel, Planning Dept Robinson,. Parks & Recreation Tom Anderson, Parks & Recreation s ' Cor s of engineers Texas Parks and Wildlife i } Jim Bell, Parks Director Bill Jobes, Chief, Design Branch + Clarence Ham, Head, Master Planning Branch Sam Garrett, Planning Branch ' Mike Herring, System Planning Branch Steve Wild, Planning Branch Ray Losornio, Project: Manager 2. After introductions, Mr. Taylor stated the purpose of the meeting vt,ri two-fold, 3 (a) to bring ti,e Texas Parks and Wildlife Department together with th^ local sponsors (Dallas and Denton) with the Corps as facilitators, and (b) to establish a date of a comprehensive planning workshop with public involvement. f 3, Mr. Bell stated that the State would consider taking over operation and maintenance of all park areas, including day use facilities at Ray Roberts Lake provided: j ' a. Major recreation development be limited to three main parks with boat ramps at highway crossings. b. The local sponsors would absorb the local portion of capital costs of develop- ing all the parks with the exception of Isle du Bois Pa-k, for which the State is " negotiating an agreement with the Corps. c, An agreement woule. need to be reached concerning the responsibility for covering the O&M cc'sta over and above the State's revenues in fee collections, leases, ► etc. These proposals would necessitate acquisition of additional park lands in some areas and deletion of lands in others. Mr. Taylor and Vr,, Hartung agreed in concept to rr. Bell's proposal. The following points were also brc.ught out in discussion of 1 Mr. Bell's proposal: RA a U,S.GM1979-0.310•gai18129 DA I f E E b 7 2496 NfiPI.ACYS DD P'~NM 3 6 , WHICH I S O BSOLEI E. • r • r 1 L _ A 00 SWF?VA--DC SUBJECT: Conference Notes Ray Roberts Lake 15 Apr 81 a. If there were a question of additional 0&M responsibilities v.s. capital funding, the local sponsors would prefer to contribute capital monies (acquisition and development.) b. The State would be responsible for development plans for all park sites according to the Master Plan being developed by the Corps with review by the Cities and Corps. The State, Corps and the local sponsors would need to mutually agree as to when future develop- ment was needed. c, The State could substitute or add revenue producing facilities to the plan, which might not be eligible for reimbursement. d• If additional land acquired over what the Corps had originally proposed is required to carry out the three park concept outlined by Mr. Bell, the local sponsors indicated that the Recreation contract3 provided for flexibility in allocating project costs between land, roads, facilities, etc.. The stipulation in the contract is that the Master Plan will govern. I E 4. It was determined that a public involvement workshop would be held in 30 to 45 days, ' preferably before 4 Mar 81, in the Denton area. Data from surveys conducted by the State was to be provided to the Cities of Dallas and Denton and the Corps, by the State. 1 . 5. Other items as a result of the meeting were as follows: a. The Corps is to provide the State data on the Project Theme developed for the lake. I b' A field trip to the expanded park tires by representatives of the State local sponsors and I Curps will he set u as soon a up as r 1 ~ fight of entries can be obtained. } c. The City of Dallas is to furnish the State the operational plan for the Ray Roberts/ Lewisville system. f d. The State is still interested in exploring the possibility of establishing a ` corridor along the Elm Fork between Ray Loberts and Lewisville. ' e. The State will consider management of the remaining lands for wildlife management purposes, f. The Corps stated that oil and gas drilling would be prohibited on all park sites. f ~1 I t j WILLIAM P. JO , Chief, Design Branch 1 d'L TOM TAYLOR, City of Dallas HRi5 t a. o y of nton TO: Tom Taylor, City of Dallas Chris Hartung, City of Denton Jim Bell, Texas Parks & Wildlife Shigeru Fujiwara, Corps of Engineers 2 r d ~ i CITYof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566-8200 April 29, 1981 i Mr. Mike Tubbs Dallas Water Utilities City Hall Dallas, Texas 75277 Res Sharing Hydroelectric Benefits on "Lewisville and Ray Roberts Lakes Dear Mike; Attached is a list of points for consideration that Z drafted as a result of the meeting w4 had regarding sharing the benefits of hydroelectric; facilities on-Lewioville and Ray Roberts Lakes. We have reviewed thess with--our Public Utilities Board and have received their general consensus." i 2 will be happy to meet with you at your convenience to discuss these issues further. Yours very truly, R. E. Nelson, P,E. Director of Utilities REN/gcr ce: Chris Hartung, City Manager✓ File Attachment (1) ~p net Idly APR 3 0 1981 CCTV n~, hr.iT~~1 SHARING OF BENEFITS RAY ROBERTS & LAKE LEWISVILLE HYDROELECTRIC FACILITIES City of Denton--City of Dallas The benefits shall be shared based on the following: 1. Denton shall share with Dallas the benefit of the hydroelectric energy resulting from the flow of Dallas' safe yield of 54 MGD' from Ray Robert.; Lake less sales Dallas may make to other; entities directly from the Lake and not flowing through they., hydroelectric facility. 2. Denton shall share with Dallas the benefit of the hydroelectric energy resulting from the flow of Dallas' safe yield of 94 MGD from Lewisville Lake less sales Dallas may make to other entities directly from the Lake and not flowing through they hydroelectric facility. 3. The share of such benefits due to the City of Dallas by the City of Denton shall be a percentage of net benefits. (Such percentage to be negotiated; suggested range 10%). 4. The net benefits shall be the difference between the costs' De.lton experiences in owning and operating the hydroelectric; facilities and the lowest nun-firm electrical energy available to the City of Denton. 5. The cost of owning and operating the hydroelectric facilities shall include all direct operating and maintenance expense, all direct and indirect administrative expenses, plus a rate of return on the rate base. 6. Rate of return shall be based on the embedded rate of interest for the project or an interest rate equivilent to the City of Denton's electric revenue borids at the time the project(s) is financed, plus 1.5% as compensation for the risk associated with ownership and management responsibilities. i r Page 2 r of return shall be applied to the rate base which shall be I 7. Rate composed of depreciated original plant investment, construction work in progress (CWIP), and an allowance for working capital. All cost of service expenses shall be based on the "utility" I' method of accounting. R' 8. The benefits shall be calculated and payable annually based on the City's fiscal year and paid after operating results have r been certified by an outside firm. 9. In return for sharing the hydroelectric benefits, Dallas agrees i to operate Ray Roberts Lake and Lewisville Lake discharges such that hydroelectric energy output is maximized. i 7301A v i Y r" r, t CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DFNTON, TEXAS 76201 % TFL FPNONE (817) Sbb 8200 April 29, 1981 Mr. Bob Gooch Freese & Nichols, Inc. 811 Lamar Street Ft. Worth, 'texas 76102 Re: Water Supply Contract Negotiations Dear Bob: Chris Hartung and I have discussed your proposal to analyze the safe yield of Ray Roberts Lake. We agree that this analysis is necessaryr; and, therefore, hereby authorize Freese and Nichols to proceed with such, analysis. You are authorized to spend up to $2,900 for such analysis. Yours very truly, R. E, Nelson, P.E. j Director of Utilities i f { I ~ REN/gcr cc: Chris Hartung, City Manager " f File DEPARTMW OF THE A111Y FO'iT tiVUi?TII NSTitVUT, caiif 5 i;F EP;lil!lEKl3 p, 0, F]Ox 17.100 r FORT WOF2TH, TEXAS 70102 19 may 1981 SWrFD-DC Mr. Uarv y Davis# Executive Director Taxes Department of Water Resources 1700 N. Congress Avenue p. 0. Box 13087 C Austin* Texas T8711 'i i y. Dear Mrs Davis' request lby the This letter is to provide pertinas~t information eoneeruing the illof>erts l cities of DALLAS and Denton to obtain on extension of their resent water right permits Was 7980 end 1706A for Lewisville and Nos. 3311 and 3312 for PAY (formerly Aubrey) Lakeep With the To%" Water Gbsedssion* iatad TbA CAPs Of &>*iwers, joxt Worth Districto currsatly has on file coMPl to the the Assistant local to pt~8eerstary voter supply and recreation coak~Yes'a~eee~ted the by cities My I*brrta ].eke prOJ*Qt. They also issued a Water Quality Certificate of AM in depteabsr 1980. YMW eg"*y in the sacra Wasth, to this 450004 Cosetx"tion project commenced with the first Land p.rehase in September Of the chased in the area of the s~)*AMt, spill- 1950, way Lairds are p"s a t1 y Wag Purchased M4 Outlet works, along with the associated to sources of $wordd a co"tructioa eontrsct reguired foretb*" in April•ofW19829 The entire oproject is schodrLsd for cosr- P for hs abov plstirn in April 1988. l Sinceral7, I S. PU3IWARAr P.H. Chief. Zugineering Division M Copies furnished s Ws, Thom" Its, Taylor ~ saw Dallas Voter Utilities City }Sall MAY c, 19n1 Dallas, Tx 15201 j_,*4 Chris Hartung C1[Y , L~Etd'SC'~ Char of Thelatota MANA :r: 5 OFFICE r *alcipal Building J~Mtou, Tx 76201 LAW OFFICES BOOTH, LLOYD AND SIMMONS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 302 SAN JACINTO BUILDING 9TH & SAN JACINTO AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 FRANK R. BOOTH 512-478.9506 ROBERT H. LLOYD June 17, 1981 LUTCHER S. SIMMONS ` PAUL O. QOSSELINK [ SKIP NEWSOM j PATRICK W. LINDNER r BRENT W. RYAN DOUGLAS 0. CAROOM i Mr. Chris Hartung t City Manager E 215 E. McKinney St. r I Denton, Texas 76201 I , RE: City of Denton Aubrey Project i Dear Chris: Enclosed is the hearing examiner°s proposed order and i extension of time on the referenced matter under Permit Nos. 1706A and 3312. I expect the Commission to enter these orders at their meeting on June 29, 1981, as a routine matter. Neither you f nor Bob Nelson need to be present. E Kindest personal regards. j r. Very truly yours, Frank R. Booth ? I FRB/nlm Enclosure cc: w/enclosure) i I i { Bob Nelson JUN 1 y 1 i~sl 1 t CITY OF DFNT01' MANAGER'S OFFICE I I R I HEARINGS EXAMINER'S PROPOSAL FOR DECISION to be presented to the Texas Water. Commission The City of Denton has applied to the Texas Department of Slater Resources for an extension of time from September 1, 1980 to September 1, 1982 for the commencement of construction authorized under Permit No, 1706A, which allows conversion of 47,424 acre-feet of flood storage to conservation storage in Lewisville Lake on the Elm Fork, Trinity River, Trinity Liver Basin in Denton County. , Applicant also seeks to extend the time for completion of j construction from September 1, 1983 to September 1, 1986• The permit was issued on September. 1, 1976, and originally required construction to commence on September 1, 1978 and to be completed i on September 1, 1981, By order of October 23, 1978, the Commission extended the times to commence and complete the construction authorized by this permit to September 1, 1980 and September 11 1983, 1 respectively. Larry Persky, a Commission Hearings Examiner, conducted a public hearing in Austin, Texas, on May 21, 1981. Notice of the application and hearing was published on April 28, 1981 and May 4, 1981, in the Denton Record Chronicle, a newspaper re-Tularly published or circulated in Denton County, Texas, the publication area in which the source of the hater is located. Notice of the application and hearing was i mailed to all claimants and appropriators of record with the Commission in the Trinity River Basin and all navigation districts within said basin. At the hearing, Frank R. Booth, Attorney at Law, appeared in behalf of the applicant; Suzanne Schwartz, Staff Attorney, appeared in behalf of the Executive Director of the Texas Department of Water Resources; and Jack Cox appeared as the Public Interest Advocate of the Texas Department of Water Resources. The following were admitted at the hearing as parties to the proceeding: The applicant; and the Executive Director and Public 1 Interest Advocate of the Texas Department of Water Resources. No one appeared to protest the granting of this application, After a review of the record, the Examiner recommends that the 1 Texas Water. Commission issue the attached order. `.1'he Examiner's recommendation is not adverse to any party to the proceeding. Laicry Pe sky y~. Hearings Examiner June 9, 1931 .;d,sUY rr4 a v. ,u. l.G a r',.a m :rh ttC F i , t ~ ~iWW.;3~fitdevw::uh~i:eLa.as.....wm.. . _ _ . ~ilxdFaVSnbae.'= r _ •1ta x n rrs'~ e-.gr 4 t az'i-.. !a`c~.~~i7t~~~..! .S ":`.?i4 r:'F. . , . i nix,,s DEPARTMENT OP %VATER RESOutICFS TRA WATH IAMMALIN A S ~5 po AN ORDER extending the time for City of Denton to continence and complete construction of the project authorized by hermit No. 1706A. On , came on to be considered before the Texas Water Commission the application of City of Denton s6eking a two-year extension of time to continence construction of the project authorized by Permit No. 1706A, and a three-year ex- tent,ion of time to complete said construction. i After considering the application and matters thereto related, the Commission is of the opinion that the application is j reasonable and should be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED BY THE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION that City of Denton shall continence construction or installation of all works authorized by Permit No. 1706A by September 1, 1982, and complete the project by September 1, 1986. All other terms and conditions contained in Permit No. 1706A which are not specifically contrary to the terms of this order f shall remain in full force and effect, Executed and entered of record, this the day of .1.981. TEXAS WATER COMMISSION telex Mc Dona . , Chairman ATTEST: Dorsey B3. Hurdeman, Coe issoner i Mary Ann Hefner, Chief Clerk i HEARINGS EXAMINER'S PROPOSAL FOR DECISION to be presented to the Texas Water Commission The City of Denton has applied, pursuant to Section 11.145, Texas Water Code, and Rule 156.04,25,001-.003, to the Texas Department of water Resources for an extension of time, Applicant seeks to extend from September l., 1980 to September 1, 1.982 the time for commencement of construction of Aubrey Reservoir authorized under Permit No. 3312. Aubrey Reservoir will. impound 799,600 acre- feet of conservation storage on the Elm Fork, Trinity River, Trinity River Basin in Cooke, Denton and Grayson Counties, of which the City of Denton is authorized to impound 207,896 acre-feet. Applicant also seeks to extend the time for completion of construction from September 1, 1983 to September. 1, 1986. The permit was issued on September 1, 1976, and originally required construction to commence on September 1, 1978 and to be completed oii September 1, 1981. By order of October 23, 1978, the commission extended the times to commence and complete the construction authorized by this permit to September. 1, 1980 and September 1, 1983, f respectively. Larry Persky, a Commission Hearings Examiner, conducted a public hearing in Austin, Texas, on May 21, 1981, Notice of the applica- tion and hearing was published on April 27, 1981 and May 4, 1981 f in the Denton Record Chronicle, a newspaper regularly published f or circulated -n Denton County, Texas, the publication area in which the source of the water is located. Notice of the application and hearing was mailed to all claimants and appropriators of record with the Commission in the Trinity River Basin and all navigation districts within said basin. At the hearing, Frank R. Booth, Attorney at Law, appeared in behalf of the applicant; Suzanne Schwartz, Staff Attorney, appeared in behalf of the Executive Director of the Texas Department of Water Resources; and Jack Cox appeared as the Public Interest Advocate of the Texas Department of Water Resources. The following were admitted at the hearing as parties to the proceeding; The applicant; and the Executive Director and Public Interest Advocate of the Texas Department of Water Resources, No one j appeared_to prrotest the grantir►g of this application. After a review of the record, the Examiner recommends that the Texas Water Commission grant the application. The Examiner's recommendation is.not adverse to any party to the proceeding. J / Larry e; ee sky Hearings Examiner dune 11, 1981 a.J r'r.Y ~ '4'Y S i.iA :aG •1, , .i n.. ,.i.-.1_j..u..l . . .i. _ i I I , p.n v"n.' ~..Fn {y~~(S'POii' 1 to li'!:;'tV~'Y •.'f zLE'S !T?,t ~s ly, ..q +.,(.vsv~r~i~7tF'~~,$~s3ldrFA}•.i 4~ c, gr.i"~:._Gk.~.ri&t°~..`t~5'~5~~ ~0ast , ~x - t,r. tai. J''.''s~ ~ . i , r-~ TRX..o DEPARTMENT 01' ~ WA'I'IiR RUso,-.<C:ES q s l w ^ AN ORDER extending the time for City of Denton to commence and complete construction of the project authorized by Permit No. 3312. I- , On f the Texas Water Comn+' came on to be considered be•fore zssion the application of City of Denton seeking a two-year extension of time to commence construction of the project authorized b ` Y Permit No. 3312 and a three-year-ex- tensionof~time to complete said construction. 1 After considering the application and matters there I j the Commission is of t~ related, i the opinion that the application is reasonable i granted. NOW, WHEREFORE BE t IT ORDERED BY THE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION ' r that City of Denton shall commence constructs ~ on or installation Of all works authorized by Permit No. 3312 b complete the y September 1, 1982, and project by September 1, 1986. I All other terms and conditions contained in Pe Permit which are not specifically contrary to the terms of, this order shall remain in full farce and effect. Executed and entered of record, this the ~ i of 1981. day J TEXAS WATER COMMISSION r Pe ix McDonaZc~, airman _ ATTEST; f ' I Dorsey f3. H`ardeman,'Comm"^z saner k~ MaryY A nn I Winer; C-ief C erk ~k I G i E i CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL 8UlLDlNG / DEN70N, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 Office of the City Manager t ~ E j ~ MEMORANDUM ~ , TO: All City Hall Employees FROMi Chris Hartung, City Manager j 4 DATEt May 27, 1982 SUBJECTS PARKING j The ground breaking ceremonies for Lake Ray Roberts will be taking place tomorrow (Friday) in the Civic Center. The Civic Center parking lot will be used for those persons.attending the ground breaking ceremonies, Therefore, City employees will be allowed to park in the municipal parking lot. Parking in the parking lot at the west end of the building, the Sheriff's Office parking lot, the Police Department parking lot, and/or the Post office parking ~ i lot WILL BE PROHIBITED! I Please be reminded that this parking privilege is for Friday only. After this 1 I day, ALL employees will be expected to park in the Civic Center parking lot unless they have been given a permit from my office allowing them to park elsewhere. 1 Your cooperation will be appreciated. E I G. Chri lartung, City Manager I GCHsWw 0549M r I i i { 1 r REVIEW OF MASTER PLAN FOR RAY ROBERTS LAKE M I k , MEETING AGENilA I 7 December 1982 I" Introduction of Meeting participants r~ I Overview and Status of Master Plan Contents i Contracts Project Land Allocation and Management Responsibilities Schedule < .Discussion of Comments Ongoing Actions , Recreation Cost Comparisons I Operation and Maintenance Responsibilities Fish and Wildlife/Recreation Opportunities i Open Discussion Session z ~G 1<<< 1y ir6-LL I O?~V fr- KNt v) l) y 'I z s I A I 1 REVIEW OF MASTER PLAN FOR RAY R.OBERTS LAKE ! f Prin~ar} Partic a is City of Dallas Tom Taylor City of Dallas. Jack Robinson City of Dallas Tom Anderson City of Denton 1 Bob Nelson Charles Travis Executive Director, TPWD Director, Wildlife Div, TPWD Ted Clark James Bell Director, Parks Div, TPWD Bob Sounds Inland Fisheries Div, TPIM District Engineer, SWF SWF COL Theodore G. Stroup Ch Engineering & Planning Div, Shig Fujiwara Ch, Planning Br, SWF D. L. Mills Ch, Environmental Resources Sec, SWF j H. Roger Hamilton Cell ChCh,, Real Office of Cstate Div, SWF Mike Cottrell selt SWF oun e C of ' Al Proctor Ch, Design Br, SWF Bill Jobee Ch, Operations Div, SWF Allie Majors Also Present . City of Dallas Larry McDazliel City of Dallas r Clarence Warnstaff Parks Div, TPWD Mike Herring Parks Div, TPWD Bob SinglQton Mitigation Coordinator, TPWD Roy Frye Ch, Management & Disposal Br, SWF Jim Cain Ch, Civil Engineering Sec, SWF Jack Hussey Environmental Resources Sep Steve Wild Environmental Resources Sec { Marty Hathorn 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 k f~ i i i i /~f~~/.~ ~ /;//Vl /7: ~),C'i' (I/. ~ C`~~Lr J~<.~/l• 1',..r l^7/:•7 if:%f''!'~.f ~ a j MM , f ji ~1,1~ r,C, ~/V Y'/ r"/41 T'/r'J ~%f~c1 J,: J ,l.l ~i ,f' ~jl')'i'l~ !iC/ 'J /f J"` ,i~y!~ i r i i i r n A, ec' Ile) I ' s i '5e) V 4) L i psi/o~/'1~.~~i. .l''i~~~:1 f ~5)•i. ~1✓4 J' ~s r„ r 1 , ~ ~ r 1 i ~ s ~:v/t JG.~rr f i I, G°'l? ra ,,J pr- Ile, p f I Ae, rlr~/.~l`.f / (~I.1.'., j✓'Q^~JO//ti L" ~ . a.%t `l'1 /J'/'•~f'ii'r~.J' lU~~ /N~/ir/t Ivu~l f 1 /'vh r!',5 L~ti ~ ~r-,off' ~"`r• f i.S , ~ ~ ~ ~L~/Fi✓1'~" /,r,''ffG1,~JJ~,~ aY•`•r/iU~7..,~J,% : i y'Ulri,~~~ w /le-r0'r rx.~ /~,06LA~ /J c4',.,~ dc.. cJ ,/61~~n•t's :f l,aratC/r.1 k r 1 ; t I I I i 1I t, i p J n ~G~/t/el/i"t~,v t I I r i i 1 I~ I i ' E I I i ~II 9 I mor pt, ror I.e/' n I 1 ? 'w~ 1 I I ~l f ' y , Rod i~;:.l i I 1✓ ti r 3" \ I I n'Orn wH yvf r h ' nun ~ • SA'GER rat 1140!.. ° •iyl I~ _"t ~ ~ 1 5'.~ t~ ~4 } ~ sf ~ - ~ ` rr rAe 1. \ •41 i` P.. ~ ~ rJ 1 ` ' • yr ' r47 ^ to I , , ~ .,1 ~ i \ ~ _ ll r +a Gr "1 } AUGACY "9 ~ j \ \ ~ 1 r \ ' a%Nr 171 _I t, KRUG£RVILLE ' `A !Y ! ( `I plop "MIT) } GHOM. x, I . \ ID E +ON o 44 Ix FA 717-7 y. 004100 1~ f-.YF •1 „ .LWCOI H' t,0 IJ PAR, I rat. 1 t7 :>dfw .H 1 r01 t00f171Ir Ot NIOKr ~ T _ ♦ p 1f TL VNIGlN 1. • l ` , 1. ) •l 1 - I ,\aur0•q , .1 1 ~ I ~i! ~Y tl S , I I , , iI, 111 rte » ,-•:1 , '1 fl, f : ~ loo \ 1 r1 t,I l.+ i ~ / / I Mq n0 ` l t \ .f / ~ 4,.. • Oi •,r`,' CamrNaM`r ,~,'~r 1 • Z J , r. r .,'I / r ✓ • ..r; N \ I:! OAKPOINY .t 1 7- _1_ + , Srrortocalll \...I r.t SHAOY H or / ` I , r I Its I ~I N•~ ~r ,yl ~.i f 7. ~!/rl 4' '•l ~l + '(h~ r9 ~r 1, F 1 ,r/ I II~~''. fvti rL ,r,+ !)l ,r11 1 Er ,f 1~-__' 11 , liln ,t/ / f t^ a, '1 ~r• Y Qrllr I I J I ^-41 W ^ 1 - .y ie f, SS . e n 1 I , i' ,LA71E'N000 i` + (r' ; ~?J t t •°'.a / toowrls, ~'i ' l~ I , ~i n ` •ri'~♦ II! I, '"M1"^ li r'-.:. , , r.•• Ire' rt'i / SAKE ALLA9 1 F l~ / , , alb' C .::t' a .•rr 11 " d . rC A 'f` ~tAltS .•y:OV~ ^ NI M Y ''t,' ~R Ex 1 Floe 77 I ti✓ H 1 ARGYLE `f3414 • 1 a/1 "i Ih.^ or le h~ ! ± 000 441 L , ,~uun\u ~y~. J . J EJ r•, M , • jeep ~ ` i. k\.f NI ~ . tl / I CQPPE 1 'l,~'~°"','- .1 ~.3 t ) I_" J fr . r~ car, lJ Ciry 5::, CITY OF DENTOt3 U71L171:S9 M E M O R A N D U M DF~ TO: File FROM: Bob Nelson, Director of Utilities * DATE: December 13, 1982 RE: Ray Robert Recreation Contract Regarding Meeting With The Corps, Dallas, Denton and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Present: See Attached Schedule I { i The meeting was held at the Corps of Engineers Offices in Fort Worth on Tuesday, December 7, 1582, to discuss the contract between the Corps of Engineers and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and other issues relating to the Master Recreation Plan for Ray Roberts Reservoir. Details of the Master Plan were discussed by Roger Blank with--the Corps of Engineers. The Corps requested that any comments that the State or local sponsors had on the Master Plan should be returned to the Corps by Tuesday, December 14, 1982. This is necessary so that the Corps of Engineers can be confident that this j is the extent of scope of the work necessary so that they can begin preparation of their 1985 budget. This budget process begins in February, 1983. The Corps anticipates that it will take approximately one year to get the Master Plan and the contract with the State reviewed and approved by all levels of the Corps of Engineers. Jim Bell, Director of the Parks and Wildlife Department, expressed concern over the commitment to funding other recreational projects at the Ray Roberts Reservoir. The State will be funding all of the isle-DuBois Park, with such funding representing part of the local sponsors' 50% share of the total park funding on Ray Roberts Project. If the Federal. Government changes its policy of building recreational facilities and decides not to build the remainder of the parks on Ray Roberts, the State is concerned that the reservoirs would have inadequate recreational facilities. Mr. Bell expressed that it is imperative that the Johnson Branch Park be an integral part of the overall parks project at Ray Roberts so as to complement isle DuBois Park. The State does not want to go ahead with the project and result in one major State--owned and operated park with no other supporting parks with the result being a substantially overloaded and overcrowded park at Isle DuBois. The Corps of i 00 F Page 2 wa.s to build the recreat on Engineers expressed that present policy and that only recreation facilities that for Roberts, are being considered facilities at Ray the Corps of Engineers guarantee the' r were operated by FSowever, the Corps could not The Corps and all removal from fundin Congress on funding recreation* future position of assure that it is the intent of C the local sponsors cculd only ass dep facil~esss now, but ultimate construction will arties to build such p ties upon funding by Congress. that was now :going on in the the existing landowner. The Corps .aa~vised Jim Bell questioned the road building that this isle DuBois Park area b proceedings are now underway, and that condemnation activity has now been stopped' position would the corps and local sponsors what te to the beJim on 13e11 f auture sked private or public entities having a o1 c not to , i Reservoir. The Corps expressed that it was their p parties to have land or access anyerights I allow private clubs or has They expressed that no existing or laeatereacthis e time and the Corps or access to the wat r do fot so. I not anticipate if there are any does It was noted that t sides, that are need to be public entities, such as local that egsuch or universities, Plan and introduced in the very immediate interested in such access? incorporated in the master ` future. or onsors'that it may become necessary It was--.noted by the local sp out of the lake to local I appropriate to sell water directly y and that in such an entities, -such -as- a water District ar a Cit # the event, State to allow a and pump station in the this would have accworkedesws with the Corps such entities to h h reservoiro rights. The corps advised that Jim Bell asked the status of mineral unded area and some of the mineral rights had been purchased for all of the land under the Dam but in the water imp ht In structure itself, resent owners retainextra eral the. private flood easement areas, F ps and the event that the minerals were to be I O through all necessary Federal Cor hae to v processes to develop facilities to remove such partios w ulat ory State reg minerals. advised that the State has expressed an interetat in three The Corps onds in the northwest section of the Y lake ponds soil conservation F ere are tic tual used as an upper lake fish hatcherY• urchased and would be within in that area, three of which would be p the boundaries of the lake. Flood easements would be retained. on eratian and use of those is tt.e remaining upper three lakes and the op lakes would be granted to the existing l ndow gr . the upper tState Fishery Group's desire to provide annual ee expressed lake with new fish from these ponds. The local sponsors zeld from the reservoir due to same concern about the loss of water y waterhat the these structures. The State adaisidnif.t was icantnamountsco ipated retain . Theo Statel plans to release the water and the structures would the summer period fingerling fish each spring. A Page 3 The Corps advised that the State Wildlife Division has asked for approximately 1,000 acres of water foul refuge be built in the upper reaches of the .lake. These structures would be closed and water would be retained from October through March. In March, the water would be released and the areas would revert to nesting areas for water foul. The local sponsors pointed out that this would represent some 100•-150,000 gallons lost v°ld per day and, at the present rates, would cost the sponsors approximately j $30-$40,000 annually. However, in the interest of making the reservoir a good reservoir for all parties involved, the local sponsors recognize tl.e benefits of such an area and agreed to allow this to remain in the Master Plan. It was noted that the construction of these water foul areas and purchase and rehabilitation of soil conservation service dams would require additional .Funds. These funds can be provided from a different federal government program on a 75% federally funded and 25% other funded basis. The State would like to have the local ! sponsors pick this part up. The Corps advised that it was not F possible to remove any of the facilities out of tha parks' portion of the project and reallocate such funds over to these projects. Therefore, any funds the local sponsors may provide to this would # have to be separate. Denton and Dallas were riot receptive to any additional funding. The Corps also advised that some into., 'eat has been expressed by the State and other entities to purchase a green belt area that would i interconnect the upper reaches of Lewisville Reservoir with the lower reaches of Ray Roberts. This area would be approximately 1/2 mile', wide and seven miles long, rep;:esenting approximately 2000 acres and costing $2•- $2.5 million. The Corps stated that a 75% ' federal. and .25% local funding.. arrangement would be possible. The ` State expressed that they did not have such funds for this green l belt or the other two fish and water foul projects, but that, in III order to provide a complete recreational project for which they were considering committing to a long term operational expense, that they felt these three projects should also be included. Denton and Dallas did not make any commitments regarding such funding desires. r I R. E. Nelson, D rec-tor of"L;1 it es 1 t 1545U/3 F i f ~l I k I i i2.f:..C_.~_?. i S of 0is 0( r~a ~'a~ns;n~c israu~atl ~ C+sysehaltD ~os~ ~:a~itt#t4iiak~4 ~rnrd 1''l~thsl~.~!~~. 4>ia~3,,xi hillVL~ GUM I i ih,Y, ,)liCi+oat L. ,'Ji•7i1kis onr US. fish asxti V114 fa ~apt'vir.a :9~ vric+s Y.lerttrurn YaX "Arig j i Tlayloc :st;Voet Port WOV01, t,rx~l~ 7.,11102 Hr, 4 V144A YU11 Yor yi ur totter <3k 0"0, t!17NF13ti3i1t.ak V, Oil Tho +9rAtr MaaOLAV Plant NY Ose Flay 104r?N7:t'a Inho Pxojocr. yowl S7pmmm"t# f!UW1tdFad tha Mao foaW06 AW 1'13tDmin At i:a"On. ti *94 Or the ~~aYt'a%~trsa~rctst: Of wr60dtlr] Silrb'S. tarlusrl~rd$htYe parwoii"3nk W4 reario, LtJC611.l and 0 mtropw X•kfa^Z A- I1 tion torvidor along tho tlsa Y00 0? Cho 2'WAY nBOX trtilisW sly Wove 0II '00400 my Y, 1151, 0 as<fdue VX, held in 01 sort Arth Mtr m clftiGma to 414*406 IN f?i'avo mtlkr pt s", irRGu*"t at tt1:5 w)a,tP c:nl tairalki+x' xad W Wtkit?1x be4x4~ 00 cue Texas Who ar.d 'Al,ictll.i'Fa hopn.rrmtizl er n dlln NAZI 03+11 kM4jsk'!?'YBSDCt'kLi.Vt} OS' !:l.4'3' Ot:'3nG of 01346 ak}>; DfyrDr,1D(l, brief rovi w of thmaorlkom W the &t,(L1; BoAter ?101 tho Cflw54tawar t>S 00 9lmim W44 Ll4tvtaM to Ws' oioa A mye Saauon of anikratcs'dsn to your r.~hVri}C+~~.. 1 e s+x m'c"tid i4 tbot etlarklt agency. AV ~fsNCx'sa:t: prssisi.as: Oat ova mint fs'Ad r;onvore ivy of W WlSr144VOO to 016 lus L'iVWR i+'S tt;ran aro fish and eri.S,6111'0 onhassl44WTIt: %94xolot bulahv to WON >;w-:ik,OKUg, E eudae ti:ba prnvidr",Ati(} 01 Fb 89-11. aLf .ru,~,srdte~, flm 4U;sir+t.01pm amci4tor would bo 6 rmmi.Qn roatAGurv wt inh wo"1 i In i4tntu~c d~ur2 W W-50 V"r^ Vich rraral.d r'a1ut(.a rnpy,rc by higher a~tlt~outt since it uOL614 lt1volve, land ov~k h Sta (4CZiilft''~.t,~(ATte It i~y^S 'i1Ll.IUB 41'C..[.C,,,.t'iT ( teLt 1+1.ry+ .ter,".5rks~t......_ "1r'15l.$w ~,i cash!, cs K1r~.~1~ ~r.~~tr►}T rr~ Ci1u!~t a ik mot s9 rt ti ~ ~r~x~.ec$iD ,~rura ~ rsnn~•i'l'cta~i'wl f3"~spr~:r~:ns: «nt.TZ,y, iila Wart 14us't)s IkEm(.Ai.cs: ia% { t rl- fAr 40y or all of three funtUran r.r, a Brunt Wta:r ok acsliant iU YOUViVe:d rl;rizi 9+1y v ,V WA1ri4: R ZR54AlI,lf7+ r3r~a 4dvt n mQLA4'1 rat. kh';" Illy "O.rlt, 4Y Vickko'lr tisfr ait-119a o:; L*1,0'iwy;t>:a ?rft-ko; isr:w tdiJ.~.'E 'et s`sp-attsJ,st tr, 61'M o J'At ~ ttitl 111910%11Mtlt Of Xi,SV Of M+}E; igkA1a!r'40. PbWfrVS;Cr $hr r:+~rtG'hlktl;;~ qra<~ bY19~t• (;+drlD.4Y,Uak?llll; tx.F: rJ~ 1. t;rjltsG idSitLlYEH ~ ~~tfa%'~ll tip b ,rceo"t.nl%i V- to Al L ; I k tttt atU,~mci:ions agr!fz voi.aed Cta r:urtltctr c+~r~t+lderatt,i.nzx nE «iyiN ttitvesl.opraaat. R<t iapuoa were rta-Iota vbinh tare beyonti vesolut:ioi as lane sa3 tbo r.no>p- urat.lt:a attitat+3n displayed at thaa nzaeting eokitirtuwe3 Tba T(AXst+ patrtw fitzd Wildlife btprvrtmant, its .addition to ooiwept.ually supporting thwie isorzeo, al,sta requerota{+l that thy propognl ftrr a do flotrtaAm f irtt lte~tahery (tvat:inoo to l:a Olvali CoTtAidocatiott. In attwarizing thtlir pnyf.tion, the Dicotctor nE r:he Cato Texan Perko awl Wildlife F)e$lArttnuezt 3tatez4 tltAt 411 rratouraes, inc kudirttl fish slid wildlito, should baL nousialsred in proparAviott ref a plan for 441velrattment aari winage. sent of project. lands atad eacilit;iaea. lie furthor kodixat:'eil'chit ttho « DmpsrLment will rtot, oako ally firm commitmonto with the corEa or lncn't $Pon- sn'ro ttut:il all oee*s of concern hava beovi ratwIv<ed to their aeti.ttf.aut.ion. Itopctfully, this want of hates oponed a tt&:td dieleguEe whiolo Will letaad to s ravolution of tho isauezn io the boat public intetr.etst nod to tlen, sat.is-- faction of all partion cvtteern(W, In rite lol'ot:ost of aontlnoittit trims dialeaws, 'l. a vi forioarditaS coptiso ot; th » corxuopoudokina to the uitimo of 1101aa AAd bormon and tho Unas Psrk,s Wad 4lildli1a Fi4p&rtmetzk. , eimcoruly, i Thao4oro 4. Strang DiMtrict ne.gWee Copiers Furniehadt Mr. Thomas X. Taylor Director Dallas Water Utilities City Hall Dallas, Te+xag 75277 Mr. Charles Travis Director r Texas Parks & Wildlife Dept. f 4200 Smith $ehool Road lk Austin, Texas 78744 ~ r w"-Mr. Bob MI Leon w City of Renton Municipal Building Denton, Texas 76201 M t f M t h Ear-ty Garestructr.art. 1cr4 Ask Start on. Aubil e a. Off is al. to Pal Can ay DOROTHIE ERWIN year that would permit com- and it largely uncontroversial tax and bonding proposition Gen as for tholocai cost share of the . f idler s Dallas' official spokesmen pletion' of the reservoir by $5.4•mlllion appropriation to "At'appropriations hearings 111 1081, continue enlargement of 't'rinity ; River Project, Con- Wa'shinglon Tuesday will ask gress limited approprfatlogs 1W POPULATION GROWTH, Lake Leven, the bask water for that project to Ita'nun "k' Congress to start conslritc• he said, will overtax the safe supply for the North Texas navigational' aspects which Phllirr °eto - nee on e the nuppOr) m hater yield of Garza-Little Municipal Water District, can be financed without local AkKep Fork, a water supply In the I'trn and Grapevine lakes on taxation, St1$0s for Dallas; Denton and file Elm Fork watershed by ATER THE rejection by The $850,000 for the project Aral' voters last spring of a TRA Awminvwo Dallas' suburban water cus• It we have another - In the new budget is to com• Am',UW, . orliers, drouth, we faco.having those SttliXOn• Fined tere design of fiaodwpys and Subcommittoos of the pub. , at Tennessee Colony Resell? m°I akos. go dry; Graeser said. 5410"61k ''tic works conmmittees In ine If Aubrey is not to be For Ifig 1 'Price volt's (load control sndnvater Isell Ii0se and , UMwVO Senate will take ready by 1081, the alternative b supply, feat urea and to eon- testimony on Water projects 7s construction of a $40-mtl• SPRINGFIELD, Mass, tinee^envitu~ ntal studies. , ,rorlna t In theTrinity basln, foe fund- `Rt,tr1 III Iron pipeline system prior to (Ap) A gasoline station Fotw Truckers chase *a In" In fiscal 1076 which starts rowan co •3uj 1, that time, he said, The $ys• ownOr was tined $4,000 and <awep of Y tem would brim water from Plead Innocent Renal nIc akltront~ t Omission of; any fedora! Lake TeWAkonl Into die Elm ordered to roll back prices Epuitw two hinds for navigation facilities Fork watershed and thence by a U.S, district court Judge Pse Trawl this year rentaVes the major Into the city's treatment and after PHILADELPHIA (UPI)-- F tl complaints he had Four truckers have pleaded oarowe s -leni source, of controversy In the distribution syotem for north oharged service ` fees for innocent to charges, stem- llrrtJO-Ioq appriiprlatlons hut.eonlpet• west Dallas, the new airport pumping gasoline, miig from tb$' death, of ramir 16 cei; u i Mountain groups or residents of the area and other customer eit• Richard Burr, operator of trucker Ronald Hengst, 33, IOwat~o CO Tyfountain Creek area will [es on the west. staillons,ln Springfield, Aga. Spring, Grovel TA:, killed by tKene"whrw+ testify $1 million Lakeview wam and West Springfield, a rock dropped from iiWottei- -'Reservoir which Is budgeted THE AUII EY approprla was ordered by U,S, Dist,' pass onto his windshield last hktapl rrl lwchk a f0~ for a, construction start, tion of $2.1 million that Dal- 'Jude Frank Freeman to Jan. .31 bell ail rn during an £ndepend• Hl. Stsjes IS F And some, environmental las will request would permit lower his prices by IOC in ent truckers' protest strike. .°Pi7"a"Mrw ~i groups may object to con. eliglneerlng and site acquisl Springfield and Agawam for over gasoline prices. PWumar9 IIR$ d Inc struct Ion of Lakeview and of 1£on for ontlet works for the Springfield and Agawam far ~ Tile defendants, all of east- Su°ndel r 1 ;Aubrey at this limo.' dam by the, forps of Engt• a 5-month period, er'n Pennsylvttnla, were beers during the coming Buir was charged Charged With conspiracy to velrweid slao THE CASE OR the e $101• Jeat ill Cell n Aubrey rest$1 on district court here with elvil violate Hengi;tra elvll rights, vvdean Maul "millmillion Fork will be On Even a smaller'Appropria- violations of the Federal They entered their pia&s be- Y'" ~ SvNx r lion, however, would serve to Eonomio Stabilization Act.' fore 1J.5, Maglstret0 Richard " tented by,MayQr Wes wise, get, the lake designated as The Internal . Revenue SOrv- ire Trinity River Authority under cotistructfon; and Ice charged that he was A' Powers Is C. ` (T3tA) board president Ave . would freeze its Interest rate eharging motoristv.$1 and $2' Authorities said the rock C ry Mays and officers of the at the currently applicable pumping -fees last Decembestruck Hengst after crashlitg c a, u s, t Trinity improvement', Asso- love], r. as a ineAetsof gelling around through the windshield of his illy "Ise r oar. clation (TIA) will lead 0, call- 'rile city has bond monoY price controls truck as he traveled on Inter. Ma *AV ok esse tingency of businessmen and available for the advance 'U.S.-Flag + - state 78 near Allentown, Pa. AtN 14 pia .9,* ,public officials appearing In payment it IS Offering; Dallas Ship The defendants were Nolan W, i .,101 oupport of the funds as out- writer revenues will pay for I), Bonner, 33, Perkasie; End- A,,,, 9 io lined in the adniinlstralion's most of the water supply in Bill ~~~)rlt'OVf'(~ ward J, Ostrander, 41, Eas- g§gg budget. They will also nn' Aubrey. ! ton, and tart E, Hoffman, v 30 c7o* dOrse Dallas' bi dto-add Au- Dow Jones Hewf servito 32, and Earl 0. Zeibler, 40, ~~y3 e k brey'to the budget„ THE l'iNA6 environmen WASHINGTON The both 'of Slatington. ape M ~.x Henry Graeser said Dallas tai liiipact statement for Au- house Merchant Marine Two other men, Stanley E, Jun t' will offer to advance $1 imll- brey was filed in January Committee unanimously ap• Jl ~ Lardis, New f'rl 1i, Pa.. Jeri bki lion toward the local share of and nit other pre-constrac- proved' a bits to require that and David E. Ge mani,Sla Div. It is Aubrey's cost, to guarantee a tfon work i5 completed. 20 per cent of the oil Import- thigton, pleaded guilty Jdr t" 16-1! construction start within a Graeser said Dallas also ed into the US. by.seA,be. March 28 In ihli case and Fort Wa supportscoustructionof Lake.- carried In U.S.-flag, vessels. 1 await sentencing. ItORr wl • * • • • • • • • • • s view reservoir, whose water 1.I,5,•flag vessels currently Limit wo ll, b"t elm, j t~}fESt 51t`VEk PRICES ; supply would go to TRA for rang only about b per caul - - - " h tevw6 • We'bvy aril cell cnrUllpJ wpar,ra 'a sale to its mid-cities custom- of tl1is eOnIllry'3 imported iViet!!j rrlee6 f ppi~pp.. 3MIM ,p . j n,m+slaty bats .NS sill • NEW YORK (AP) Sid Aenhrrous 315500 Po le as O1;S. 611, metalpoles'ri+tarnH l>:ebpv,•ast5~ *a Itts,wils3~0o~<I~: • ou inns ' ME ItRllr • "Both lakes ere needed " The silt 1 ping industry sup- wound, cdrwodkvt ~.IHrt tad 9Me a H0101 toot 501a • 160pp 6t 5 to at slot • ' i l oandi One ,L1vr15t s round d0vittl tilt to A ,h * I D gt :Rc en $r, rvet toot • he said.. ports the bill oil the ground Ss.50+A a wynd, rMw ywist told }1n3c her, 00 • 6 t. aoc an Ur, over etbl I troy our+ca. PMw Ybrkt silver }S ors per 1roy sot: astInor.ovsi spot * Besides the runt for Lake• that national scattily regiiis oatce New nark Y Ntwr tM5.00 suffer f • 'fell r,uaaulos 51kOn01c oyoitnot• view, the administration ed strong merchant marlne 10"I"a1eKrl"t N ' r svrviwl ate ocia at syat • cHl AOO UP • lusoWit"lue-ts6 01,sa,ttl • budget also provides money 011 companies and the Nixon wool Future" ket >cfx+rbm~ I ' operation and mainte• adininistrallon Oppose It on HPw YORK IA11+i - WM IAW" vtore ~y 1 • CALL sit t2be tllA DAILY Slet for . ace of lakes III the Win Vital f6dUr In 1 n as'o ur leryi ai9,511 r the ground thaU.S. vessels b o kin~ Neabtads de • _ • Delivery Guaranteed by • + t'a_._ ` cost more to otcrate, The r cent require, ruturrecipaWtt,owce t o bust sit rl '~i f Lloyds Of London' • say the 20 po c q July 11.p r .a blrt s p Oct InS 1r,o blS rDAI WokrH An& w ment 0ould 'add one cent a p~ 111 S Vad b111 1.~ Vt-t.Srhr 1:>!! _t. , r! .a. • •~``'~a,- • gallon to the cost of Imported caatat:dwoascelmne. 1.111.%, alt 1y ~•y led rr_l Poll YNldwsorn9rnlfa, • 1Ai rcTr os. r, a r,r,.. • tt .-i w ~'~..~`7i I Oil. N r rv>ict,~~ ' l4+r<naay`>~raY f Ps'ge 7A. DEl11TdN lEf)~'CnRI~L"lE1tR0 a e, Y r. It a , a , ig, ,l for FrWa, forax US, Army • Corps of >✓nglnters, George. Wvay,, chairman of the federal, :3tate and local legislative . Dallas chamber's natural re.' officials gathor Friday morn sources committee and a vlco ing about tb nitlesinorth of:nmton pt"Identof HUdtoil co' owa stretch of low lying land that 1,"We'll',h&.VC'a bslaad of POPle, may, oy way not be dry after recent from the Aalias and Fort W/ rtli rattta. corps' dly1slt,n`offleess who hava'ail" It's not that &V are all nature Worked-oh the dam;'' 'rsaald; 'art, loytrs ~ orAhat they will Conduct Worth district public affairs" of 'some 60R. of outdoor seminar,c fleer, Robert G Craft; HC said he i Pirieong the damp;~can,trees eight expeet,5; oo people "'45 from each ttlils ea it of Sanger, along the InIm office; Mork of & ie Trinity River. Craft, Mid the Ray' ttn hatted instead' theWmeeiing w1ll cele' prgjerta galled the Aubroy 1Reaetir raft, the beginning ;of 'what has voir utltil a 'aged by'f 006 tt1W E been a dream. to many ,'Since its t18P,4 lrt da~tu&ry 1Wi; Is the carps' eo,krpst;lonal authorization in 1*: largest will' eircomoss a4 Roberts' estimated 48,0011 atreA M,lsnd . the constructionof Ray take. A, public ground,breaktng; surrounding 29,5150 acres of wale ceremony for Ilie estimated 4280 at normol pool elovatlon. million -project, :exptCted to' be The coitssiruction bid was commpieted in 1w88, will be Friday at awardo recently to the second; 10 a.m, at the sits of, the proposed lowest of - 10 b l d d e r s .a dame 548,857,798,95; submitted by Phillips The lake; when completed, well and Jordan Inc. of KnoXville; Tenn. suppl ,water to the Cities of Denton ,The form bidder, the joint venWre and ~a,11as,. so,the ehanibers of of RA,4>otashnlck and PotashnA commerce from .both ,Sties. wilt' Conutructlon„Inc; of .Caps host 4he; coroniony..Former, Con- Girardeau, Mo., asked to 1;e, re• gres4man itay,Roberts of Denton, leased from the bidding t ause of, who.. worked hard for the tako's an error. in t h etj r bid fl f cot> iruetton, will speak at the $43,925,724.92; The government grAtlnd-breaking, as will tht.Chlef 11010 ate on, the Constructlon con-; of Engineers of the- U,,S. Army tract, wlthout proflt, is '$59,11 U;1Q8: C•,otrpss of 1✓ngiucers, l,t. Glen. f,K• and tlio construction of the dam Is attoq ' from ~ Washington, D.C.? estimated at $50 million;, Dbhto vlayor,Itfchhrd a, Stewart; Ray Roberts 1,"e will be atkiut', ' arw~~Iyallas 'WY, 0'r ,lacy vwans; 30 nilles upstream from L6NIsvi i~ . Maker of , ceremonies Will be, . ~ e LAK E , liage 1 r I 1 Lake,,.. >~'rom Pap41 Bake Data and upon its cotltpletion, a portion of. the flood • control rage In i,ewtavfllu} x.aka w111 be` 2 Notated and --ttw. top Of the. i~ mrvation 'pool ,eatsed ,$ever' ~ feet, The Bay llio6rts.Lake dam Will e 14,250 feet long and :141 feet 'ado ve the stream bed., The darn; 11 ccx<i'about $65 million`anltwill xaR 4$i ` tocompteted in itii~, Corp officials Willow 5t, gaY e ! ;&%.tructlon of the dam, whlcb= 1 tlt~get' ~a'ti'coi►tructon i►t{e " vZlll Go►rtrol,tl►e runoff from about, r m square mllhs,wil be under the'° suparviatoh of Jim i:eslby, area: a ` ;pQ e neer, of the North Texas Area Qt IGe of the corpe; and Webster L', 13atand; Jr„ who will be proi engineer ttt' the'dam construction site. ` Fort Worth corps personnel are ` J Ay Mocatina four more cemeter; tes in the dann , slte cotittrul `area AtK. tikee lore for: kite fake''' + tf, to Diu bslke of the' ielo ilOn staff of Im Fort Worth;' c ~ ' y ` ~ , Dl~trfet, ,Anyone Having neRt~of kink f' burled in the .fore , Btaoeidinn, ' i4faxwei!-1'e•v'a'uIt Mahn,; Mckirill, Quaid, and, Enlbersoti f r , cenl(etertes is askett ~ contact him Milli, i Many historical houses, bart%; Denton and other buildings, which`nced to j be relocated because of the lake, fl Qr, are, available il to historical pre- t. sek'ation groups; who are asked to con€act corps officials In, Fort Worth, craft said, He 'said, an arrheologieal study is under way to a detertnihe sites,to be recorded And filched for future g0neratlon6; o gb to thQ' an. t1 ~i t 'dn site Qr Ray: >[tobe 4 G. e , drive The corps is also" relocating farm-to-market roa as well as th Oh 01,0900 366 ex~ on,Tex 41561 t;t Sai1gee, ah'O go east n 4s #e Al: bl",kSj' turd rig, ( (sough) an Loop l:* and, left an 1 telephone, elegtrAC xand:.wator pp , t utilities, tt also, lb:8egtll an ilipw;: tract, ;which, a ter ,,he : irailiti tracks, turn s into: , Bryn ids Rondt;io hbout se~~ero iltiies;:''h$ ground-breakin additional $,318 acres In 7lis g While. the dam is Oeipg- con,' ~r ~;.a6 ;vuhfch ~orii►r •Cnttgrus~rrrtitn Ji#ay. idbeia w1.ii, stru^.tod, tl~a..eorps .will appraise 'ti k, be n~ i~ ridgy if 10 a.m..' and negottato for ad6tional tand , needed for the iske. amid Its sur- rounding recteatlenal faGlltfes~. r eserV'oi ding, ;s. "10#0 Cartier bus signed a supplem, ta' 's iation, bin t1~t ' 4nalu! li ~ {esel~roirpro;~ct• . whob° Cotk'greaaY Robot* ~ ' ~strict~ tnaludes tle~+e, ~ tie'' t ml* try'ntr , to ~,ceese ` ~g i ~ 4~is, 4titL t3~pt Aa, dot+R trpt mt~k it-b ~ ` . ~t'bis tpbbttN tlfgt ' At+p~ri I►; as a iid brofa't rvitlt r proprtaued ~cw~a~ i~ebertat~ld, NX de~►'t ~e how' t4~;.spgtuaw jj~IStu~t,'ay.'." { '',ttkk pot* .ca wetn jo ~ `b':t r re peg(.#,e~,,~a s!~bt M del! to AA39 I ` E s , w. Zi0J, , i h , Y { r + ' , t 1 lja 7( ~P {C'j 1 ~ t ~ f, ft r k r F, ill r`::3 Ohl ' lm i i ' ~1~ssitled . ; 17 r, 1~. ✓ i'. z 3 P MAX r, ~ + l' r fF Y 4A ! F V' LLWQOD ; ~ i F~ ~~~bt~ a ~eyv,4i tMrop ~e^a M4Io~0e `bbi`l+ +i ~i mom aqu1,1,,. 0 Old '004"o j y ~ . z t ' 3 I rr : rtl y x { !i i f I i N ~ M i 1 ' Lake's water will threaten T~pp plant § j The water of Lake Ray Ruberts Will be'*Pon$ up against I top's sewage trealmeut plant if it is not moved before the lake's dam is completed f)h'.~"Ins ft'F'f;nttl'I- /!RONICIJ. . Represeaudva of the U.S. Ar- my Corps of HgiNear s tpid the EDITORIAL Tiop City Council Monday night that the agency will not buy Tiop's ` sewage plans, even though it me. I ually is l a the lake ares, Instead, llseCorpePlans to Spend Head off ♦ 5200,(100 to build a Is-root-high. horseshoe levy around the treat. meet piaat to protect it from the problems at j lake's walun, When l al Is surround Impounded for tl,a lake now !aksa, , wain will surround the Iery on both the west and south sides, i according to Tiop Mayor Kent Plans fete recreational facilities at, Ray 3 iCorkey)Orondei. Roberts Lake outlined by the Corps of Orundei told Thee 13ur•SrRna! he Enytneers promise to make the new reser- plans to contact the state Health voir north of Denton a first-class attraction, i Department to docrmine if a nul nnly for those of us who live here, but for i sewage plant can beoperated under nntch of North Central 'texas and Southern such ask ihatideu, He Said said he he also uklnhomn, wpartment for aid In While the development of parks, wildlife relocating l Plant to a more habitats. lish halcheri.s and tt possible Suitable location. SIMPnbelt are welcumP, some cure should W ThecomervadonPool ofIhetake luken m lit. dvVelnppmenl (it the lake. For 4 j Is to stand at 632,3 feet, while the one chnothing sittwld be crealed at the i sewageplarttstatsdsar633fcet.The IakP unless !here is an idenlilted and r ake's flood control pool also may rehahle source for funds to maintain it. At reachW.5feet. this point, the state has agreed 1o lake over The levy will include ■ system the maintenance of the entire lake. That that will allow excess water to be should take care of the problem. But even pumped back Into the lake when it the slate has fiscal limits, us htdicaled by rains. If the excess water reaches the recent legislative session. U the lake Is the same Level as (hepisnl'sholding bverdeveloped, from a maintenance stand. tanks, however, thesyslem will not paint, there might be park closings such as pump the untreated sewagtInto the those which have occurred on area lakes lake, maintained by the Corps, "Thefirsibtgrainraliwouldshut Another lake problem that needs to be down out sewer sysrc?n," Oruadd addressed is securily. What eon be done I said, a"ns the rain water would about II Is hard to say, but crime and I ~setoev 1 toaievel loailow disburhance-type problems have been plen. thepump to o operaate• litul on other Jukes, Anythin6' that can be 1 If the city decides to relocate the htllll Inin the Hay Roberts bake plan to f plant, the Corps will give Tioga the tmprove security for lake visitors would be l 5200,00011 would havespenton the Welcome. Conxullalions with those who try levy. Orundetsaid. to keep order at take Lewisville and other Grurubi said pall city offlclals area lakes might be fruitful, have known ilsesewaseplantwoutd The pMenliat henatlls from Ray Roberts r beln(betake ana,butthey thouttht Laic, tkwpile the loss of the land involved t` he Cotpe would buy the property, rrntn the tax rolls, stand to be substantial for Corp Officials recently completed ■ DfaN rt l'nunty. The water supp, of course, t survey Of the area, and their visit is the main benefit, The parks lyand water whhthecouncil Monday night *as recreation included will be enjoyed for the flat official word on what the nun} years. Visitors will add !o the county's t ' L'orp's position on the plant would Pclmomy, be. 'rhe lime to head off any preventable "One way or theMiter,"he said, problems at the net' lake and make the best "they're, forcing our system to possible plans, however, Is now, not after It shut." has Isere fully developed. Perhaps a com- mission made up of r resenlalIves from Benton and the other cues Involved should be watching the developments and advising those in charge. t II, E I E _ r T fk, Ray Roberts Lame may et P~aa g greenbelt, last nwk araraky a beloolift as ~Pm* Hi`IId.IMIE. I.Am wildlife sanctuary w use who art setts to wv WIMP tJM 6yJONWKIST , lakedoq'trOaalforsoreb, 3NH WrhNr Di L ~l1'SJ;~Csh in the lake, Hamillon said the to rap, City, Cggraikr~aI corps is studying the use of cur. Roiwt 3"Phooks. 1 Heerestional areas proposed for rently existing Soil Corwervalion ~ SDa gMa Mid Ray Hobert% lake - park facUi• Service ponds as fish 'hatcheries ties. wildlife tabitals, fish hntch• and keep the food chain stable f ~~p' r~~ I cries and a passible greenbelt area keeping the number of fish in the "pso , ft" Mare t<et Nllis - represent a caperalive effort lake falrtycorstset. 16 between city governments and A wetlands area for migrating Aalra~l the so bdd 1 la state, and federalagenclea, waterfowl can be developed at very plift ism. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers little coal, he added, No said the wee ale a spokesman Roger Hamilton told state would partfripale in both or ~~oft►eDageaa the Denton City Council Tuesday those protects, which would means vnsasi MM pneauk these night that the proposed areas were tremendous benefll for the area by s these ardYioeay ON her things the Corps didn't generally bringing Inwlldlifeatliltlecoet, all the cabers attess/ue tie gelanrowhenbaPldingslake, The Mlv parks depariment Is bawl" letDow" cley"A "This is not typical for a water also liderenled In a cow.slaring Sbpresa was sees/ inset resource Project." he said. "For a agreement for a greenbelt down becakisUeU.S.AmyC"of relaUvely few Investment dollars eight of the 11 miles of Ilse Elm xellrare "saw john be you can capture some real long- Fork a the Trimly River between ballel a*hia;maisorpnkA- ye f term beneriU." Ray Roberts and take Lewisville. Isle dr less irk aoaa the down fl Hamilton said maperallon from The greenbelt would be a rely. ted]olnsetaonto&P rkaayat the clues of Denton and Dallas, and lively narrow strip with minimal sort! bole o( ow tare. Caep e,6 Re, umnrel amount of Interest from development, Hamilton said, it Wale riot otilr parts woabf be the Texas Parise and Wlfdilfe De_ would allow wildlife to Rowdah and fillsWWl(potYrla. h WrtnteM have allowed the rear also provde boM access romps to What the mom is trot do alMn plans to expand beyond their theriverforearieslautnching, stet nt Wority of tyke. usual scope, So ail the Hone will be When Ray Roberta Is firA%Iwd, A" hose Includedat Ray Roberts Lake. the level of Lake Lewisville will be The new water supply and flood raised, floatrise same of Its eNPalml.sego control lake is under construction park Areas. Denton thPon e lake, forin liter rit, b"is r north of Denton betw" Sanger and Dallas lafndd the Carps are the slet, Wassail park, w~ and Pilot Point, to be " of arbors two notes The stale has a obligated to relocate g those parks. grt~od to take over Hamilton Bald the Alntenbeft grey North"" of Nlet Point, W maintenance d the "Wre lake area ^vidas an ideal way to put In rater pie rendyrrwoskbocorae a reality P - except for the embankment, parks, the which the Corps will maintain - "We can do this W less cost than Wiesner or ant file is spay. once construction Is completed, the new devero~enenlr ar~i with tine assn dse sr/,' as your rent Teat could mean substantial reflef gresterhonalits,' hesaid, of vlow. WRI ow apark Newby, b for Dimon taxpayem. Contracts for state portlelpatlor Pilot POW probabWy won't State participation SW meone in Ihepro*4 are In the draft stage, Nome thety f"Is"tOw'I, reduced constnc(lon cools foe tM Hamilton Bald, If approved, Denton and that "Iii be pod mews to cities, Dallas and Denton will and Dallas would contribute SO pay a percent of ewa by par !Ir tJte abemboe of s, for all recreollon p"twN of it* resa. FWj elite for the paMc the Stott Is Internses Nearby 61-0 wUt arses the ank stale will pick up a po"W" of the in having designated a stale park, boon easy m t that we at we have do, tab for txoAeeed a ar oast fish hate" 71m cilia would have to pat only y expected. gPo And wolands area for ml- 25 percent of the costs for tots Perso"Illy, 1 was sever Two math parks are greenbelt and the wikfhfe pre. Iookisleforwynftoallthe tmtfk: for comp letloh Ixopowd s`"1Yes' that the Lake would - bone P when the lake is Namillon said the greerlbett wee opened, Several others are .'`on this still "very conceptual" because Prowdrata. Rvat 4d, Pil a perk to nap and will be built "subject to some ^pie in the Corps crowd, pilot Point Iheavotkbbillty of funds." sure it had the authoritto a g in' lryt lxe. bbl wUl fl Its tbaa of The state is Inlrresled in Iat". the lard, kk heat was a tc. Info a state park in the area, and "1 think wedo,"hesoid. l ~ ~ arc kwk(ne for a boo to low IM thus is likely to pick up the lab for Sanger City Manager Llnyd^ fd 14-0 tharJd " of Isle dullote Park as the Henderson asked If Ihe" were ens am fir, however. Pflot state park. it and Johnson Branch pl;tna for commercial m=' aNnas on Point will be Ibe ciawat Wean to Park, two of the biggest park areas the lake, , Hamilton said there the "new" FM 4113, which *01 In the plan, will be the two parks weren't many places where that Create ties domaesdw1111leedtothe completed with the lake. was feasible. Isla do Rohs Park. That fact Is It. Isle duBols wW be southwest of Co"y Pilot Point Just south of the exist- staled J~ suc* k Cole nog. ail protsWy wiU sprbr lraaere! erdgeintoroad boost daft--prsnsaadbnokgg Ing Farm Road 133. Johnson led la lben 7 repolm e Etranc swill be north a455 nd about of brey~over b The pjust womt them an the roposed f sew be west argot- mldwa between ye, greenbelt an what is now Farm law the"QYaYly ~rew~"sow Point on the north side of the lake. Hood 4 at (hat point, when the fake In ya~ cwnp1,+M. "Thal bridge woukf have to be WHIZ the inforr14 kto abet The major pools will prswkb 0Ae Met fora boot wlth a treller," perk deWkoNrssnt Iq kro{ tie sites for hiking, overnight camp. h said. "ft's two-way for twin city cosind shftlel aeetewigly Ing. pkndco and boot launching. Cheveftta." k" U.S. Jt0 amen to am Hamilton sail. '111e other areas, ' Hamilton said they were aware ekgigU7Taegtktotrt am low which can be developed an demand of the problems but he wasn't sure F1/ 4M' Aa aadClty t soWy Increases, will be for more what was happening. Is lea * to doaim( tle m "pasolve" uses such as hdrsebsck "This Is all Is kaotitae to tb the sari " ng, photography and bird wal• the Corps," heap d. ""It's more b tllplnsa its brand paMenI of ins. 0111111111. to k than M(a puddle of water like you tt#I doL In ordeer eep a good stock of nwemallysee," t!<trireA, ping to be 1 low palm thouid take ~.i tweet. + We a itykt law have to work a y ' .r Council to pursue annexation program The PUoI Point City Council is r FOS} " ~~3 "l don't wanitgextendanvmore i y planning a form acommis« of When(pevp/e)seeUenfunannexingadlhul ru elf undAsrbre being choked,lhcy'!! sewer liner, nu matter what we an 7 council members and cilir ens to p p y y briny in, until we can lake of these 7 pursue annexation of'pruptrty probably wanf(annexalion),' -City CoundirnanRobertSie hens 9,000 ' bclween Iht city Wills and the P people who have been here years and they slit! don't have have M~ boundarksofRoyAobsrul.aka sewer."Eltredyese[d, During Monday night's regular extend-any of lit boundaries across proached on an ntlormsu base, but cost if properly owners do game to Councilman Ray Dant agreed bl-monthly council snecting, City open land toconneclwith propcriy nsosthaveresisted theIdea, come Into (hecfty, with Enredge's point but sAIJ the Adam. Bob Brady told the council spnpundingt,4elaketlhEIsrael city "'I hest people aroundharewanl "If you get those people in she council still should pursue an an. tbal Deaton_pblrn,tn pursue an then could antics property around to tee something before they bite," city, and you can't serve them, then nexodon program, tie sold it corn- , "aggressive annexation policy" the lakearuhdown FM 4SSAnd U.S. CouncllmanRobert Siephenssaid. you've wasted your time, and millet could talk to surrounding that probably Includes taking In 377lo?ilotPolnl'sboundarics. "When they see Denton annexing you're in hot water," Stephens propertyownersbeforeworkingup propertymourdthefalls a Brady IoW the council that he all that property and Aubrey being said, a cost estimate on extendtng city ' Bradysuggertad that the council came to his conclusion about Da" surrounded and choked, they'll At present, the only city scrvke services, Wills toproperiyownerstoconvlnce loq't plans by talking to members probably want it (annexation Into rural residenlt do not have Is sewer Mayor Tom Porter appointed them that "It would be to the ofthilcity'ssulf, Pilot Point)," service, City walerllnesextend Into Dane, ElOtdgeandCouncilwoman bestefil of people to come into the "I kind of ea the Idea they want "Then they'll probably come most surrounding rule[ arcs, and Pear JOrohamtoihecommflletand city IN*(PofnQrather than being: control of lhtselakearcu," Brady running to us," Councilman fire and ambulance personnel make said he would appoint sorry, "lay ' taken by the City of Denton, said. They want to grow, and I CharlesEttrtdgssald, runstniotheunlncorporsseaareas. persons" toworkon the commlilee. Although Iowtw W Am of pool think they can wea profit on dawn Brady noted that sale law Slnathe majorexpcnse involved asivOl. ' - Point can AW annex unincor• thetood," requires areas Annexed I m a cities to In bdoSing rural areas into the city In other business Monday Alibi, r poratedproportyunlemAsked rodo The council has discussed the be provided with all city services would be extension of sewer lines, the council awarded a contract In so, eltltw Uke Denton cu annex poaiblllly of annexing properly within two years. Because of that Ettrtdge said she council should the amount of $948 to Bighorn Ex. ^.r property without she pertWulon of between Hot Point and the lake at requirement, Stephens said, the conctnirale on extending lines to cr, aling Co, to Iear down a sub. { UM properly ovaa. Brady sold various limp In the past. Sonic councq should have some idea of area *Ilhin the current city limits standard house on Eddleman I s' De41oo would have the power to - property owners also have ap• what an annexation program will that donathavetewers<rvia, (See Couneil,Page Two) I I Parks called beneficial r ByJOMWEIST 7_;Z2 3 partment has agreed to pick up a ti tsolf Wrifa subslanllrtl part of lheclllles' case, Denton Pgrhs and Hecrealion Thestatetslnterestedindevelop-' Departaaeal Director Steve Ing isle du~lola Park as a sale Briake"a "w 7birraday that the park because the North Central rv fpoeed rwmtiw plan for Buy Texas area is deficient In stale ) Aoherta Imka should work to ew parks, ?ho stale has also Indicated r sryone's Is"dil, nassume once of tall Ilro lake ake responsibility acrd dfor I `E The U.5. Army Corps of it Will 6ftsiAesK unveiled the plans durr. AAreas s alter after [he park ` lag a Illy atmcN work ""Ion a project is COW p i tnnday, The Comm and the cities Plcled. of Deacon AM 6WI s were splltling Brinkman said tiro stale can casts on Use park areas, but the probably do the jot) better than the i . ~G I r D-C RQNIMA Friday, A,u1u4tn,'iW I)ENTON)EtCO(DiR - l• .la d. PP ass ( reenbeft Coiriftdor' 1 ask he cities lt)enton andf D4 Oleo 1 i 4`11191SPA , CitfiG T us t0 look'at the feasibility of Oveiopinl; " ,r < r' ry ' t~, 14 , r * y 1+- tA r I; , ' +lip~lt{+ hEr AU~'battle'.f t5*ndowncorridor In lieu of develgpin'now pa,~lt ; -,,t ,oYerh` enk offibialg .a#► in a areas at,IA a L"isviile,'° Hamilton sold; t ~ r ,corridor makes sense economically "The w.ight;' ! s AuCNEyllaur!ada 01 `whose property is in and gatisfies a need that is not being.Met QxeEsnbelt;COrridor, bgtw'een in this area;" 1' 14 i4lle Lake and RAY Roberts •Lake The corridor, which will, be° aft for the l'.I of formation, would ~y 11>~ 1 t t a'c4 }v!ldor bye tt)dst"Dart in h natural t9 ids At R lneei Cbrr inclUd810 OdMitive camp sttesO trails and s y a " q dqr; which Aim Greek ,could ~ used Nr,canoeing or 1311 PgnW 1,10, i. esWhl[etiih~ iiew park rafting, Hamilton a 'I. The project woL d ' an.gjf~tnS}~1'e t would s retch be run by, flhe 1I parks and ateSg bt► LevvisIl16 A, Wildlife s 3' 3 ke y J ht; y `Take d8th eight: pepartment f tsf the i:eVJie fake flood lands,. The 'Lewisville iAkg ,alternative plan '►m'tt'6 ed co`rido`C ti,'Utild Ylinge from a would inelu¢e -nine launch pads and M. IY 1 ittti~u tp`heifa diiio`~wade, lpti Flm caanping~itesHamiltotasrfld ~hetpubiiG intgrest th4ts ~ tpek, walo~vln taA¢Oaj~ros`dtf tand,:, "What's in if not, be . tkiequmflon,.'jIlAmi tot~Sa G~~Bltbeltt'+ CorM.dorj wt., tr: ~ oy~dtatlt~l,ttaer b1 Shed ` C once Aubrey resldgms sprg d,ihreelmajor pu 4 A v , Betio- + 17 I tot cittiheti4y¢n,h2'oalt` zt, ,arguments against tkle'brridOrrrido' igcluding ~ 1„ rand r tni tbn••,chis~.•aJ'' ,.~nYk JI eattai' 1dndlosg, dci,u, ~l tase:~f 14he,co S', r ' w': 1,44j~ i t'';,t "tlaesecurit,V,afthecorrkdo~ ifs tabilsh~`+, ~s i f4 ; ,01 j'ai"~y: t ';5 A tees ` nCti' b;f. '0 'f*t3 Wort Diet proposed 1 acres ;lQ,be used as t t ; n.. " ' t{, > r 1 ie t y 27 bvI°t>$t's dUld be thgt t}reepbdlt, Cprr,dgr .wagI the gain r = y3.' xtEt I'~"f 1. ~r c~drlidbr4, Con.qRafjtOlan rS,' ed trytl* PMt I ly attest~os eii downs ira e' f itatl`plople't(djj t!'nut, o~r;the, Several.:jaiyclawrteis said, of the wx' s~ r to express, then disa~prov - shoeked,tp Iearn of the 3 oX~. kene e l1i rift ',t k+ of ~a lid m' aril . . Ian i r , kslNly►~S !>rt?ipoei iltvn, of the 0t't' Woo st y: yvitldn the last few zdays Rog t' om Greenbe r ~uriny tbcon'vince when,.it has actuallyy been In existence in , Auktrey.,resid(~tits questian5~about proposel! C., 'Atttr,~gWers tllepkq hiii"slgesloraboytt l4Ye~rs3:. a public ttitieetittg Thnrs;day,noght. O i6M'.' fiti8S4~:ak':tha ns'at tie 13'(iller saitt the.PROaI would take 4 8 !l `{t}ine `,k an( w,ay;" motot? 't5 $ert~ fartit^teaVing only her Chronicle, t("We've lost iv }V s; (te }aentbn tgtY ! ller, hose I'lfiiuseadtlagniallparc~eibfland „ Another landowner, said, " H`d wilrr'tV dCkllE ; r u t t Important tht ,..`to the~tutUr9 at;:hefoa~ tlp~~e(~iund 1t's,'ylim wey,i~ stY.sA~,`y'►{y ; I o0 e ~ ? teal ;almat..Y "T``` atef,rgtand •the necessity o °.'.fa{37J ` d + N?'"Y. 1 f~ a111~~`~',t E;, 1vtlUn Uie p¢ } r4 taking 1at1d ttl furnishVAter, t~lh thR4tsilcts le bf ills Ubita ~ rectiati tfye , t ;s people, butst.CaoKbf,UndRtstarid to !Hg ror`land ihal proVld f attri.meatt kd r~ebkletf 'iii; Sif t of sa ti"'~eiti ' '31IAa the ci Visag it fgr'~ecieatfgn, espPC ally.when so Much Stale Rep: Tip iH*ll, i~Paad~, ,saiq ftbpl(3ntt~,~4 wed obtc~.yzi ~y the lagd:~Vpd ,'W4kh`r.t a ~n i!ta , ; . Abn ;dt flap ca9ts Of recr~atioti, of wi)at;'the Corps af-iRnglneers alrw,dy. Denton Coultity landowtiera, taaYg,atr~dy tri` aeCtttd ~ ~t~, ~ ` fbI (11 1t :11+"d lgkes; asked lho Corps cantrolg,.;has been fenced old from 4, ie given land` for' Le ytiivill@ Ike,' tray, f~'vlier rgad ir6illEg•lat}er she Roberts Lakc and,. t GrgpeYiue > k►' ap tai at, ~t rri" it '~d rN t4 r R, R~~tk, i j," > 8;1b ltted ' to 'rho T~entdn t#ecord Volr. . Tti ~ 1 si ~ i, r 4 ~ a vl xjr~r.ji ~ f,_,kl x'~ ~k ~2tst'",ai L lC 1 ? f <4 f `dl ~f t ~ 1 A•. a r t t A s c tPc t ~ b ;iz r• F ` } i~ tbl~ 3 I ~<:i t f?,~ f o 3.r~ ' ' , t t t t a~; qq ) r r ~ 't t .at,Z t rF3•~' ~~i~f~~°I~,'~r' tfa i• fn ~ Irv , J rq ' z k 5 { ~ t Z y ~~tp itati 1% Mad aad cal kl rEeI~eIt't ` From Faye t and use, According to Hamilton,,apprais• Ham Hon said there would b6', aUt whlch were not definite since resident staff on call in the at'Eil 24 Ow corrldor Is only In the planning hoilrs, a day that would make ` stAgel stand at about $1,683.97 par pa rots through the corridor, which acre, will be kneed in with barbed W*! t4ndowners sald the acreage during the day. w43 worth between $6,000 and 'lynch said "alt the m4nm, $10;40 per acre based on recent . happens at night," purehases• Hall, formally requested that' The Lewisville Lake alternative tlamilton tell Stroup the residents plan was favored by the landown- grant a .'public hearing 'on the ers since, there is greater demand - matter after the Aug, 31 dehdllne' for park aresaa closer to that lake. for public comments on the'pI Landowner Bill Lvneh said that the posal funds should be "spent down there, "lf. it ,foes through, it ttlll be make It where the people are.!' "The use of parks is exce,sly-, controlled by the state..: sit on the Visitation will incrensr; We're Appronrii,t6ons Committee, f feel X never going' to stttiafy the de- have enough power on, that `Corn-. mated; ' Hamillon said. mittee to, say that none of this 'Accoro;ng to a study conducted tnorlny (that is appropriated to tho, 0y the Corps of Engineers,' Almost U66 Parks and Wildlife uu 300,000 people could be expected to partment) could be used to meld u6e.the Greenbelt Corridor annu• tain the Greenbelt Corridor," llal~ atlly, said. 1 laindoWners were also concerned While neither the landownom nor about the security and safety In the the Corps of Engineers wan; the corridor if established. battle, Mrs, puller anld, "We"cer- Rer•;idents said they reared the tainly convinced thet`, that this is Area would be used for not the nonc.ontloversial r Mescal purposes such as issue they thought it was." tl'aSll dullll)illg r "Ray Rob''ns L-.'k',,,, ahead of shed e BY;JON W E I SY , farm land taken out of production' Staff Writer The most.excltement gerier~.tk%i, 44I personally feel that Deatbft'' by Pay Robr,rts Lake this y~,ar and DaUAs 'are abk.ing all didnI have much 19 do with the . citliens of Denton' County >o;~ti lake itself, poet pn obtlgattoa they kltow oy Although cot gritetlon otn the had," Jackie Puller told a SOpt 28 15,00¢-foot-long darn is altnost'a full -public hearing in. Aubrey , Mrs.' year ahead of schedule, the Fu116r,-a'public school teac~}terW water-supply resoevoh''s 'disunc been-one of the propok$i'k;m'b$t t,on this year was that `it was ,.vocal critics beecause.^a aitlptarlttal conneotcd to a coptnbver~ial'park portion of her family's faR~M, es -p1p eds) that hasn't yet been de-' wi kin an ate c~slgnatkd fbr the pa. Th'e UI S. 'Army Corps of k:nglneers anr,ounced,tn mid-JWy, It was considering' et the request of the Denton and 3allas, a gteegt,lt Gree0bbelt c6r~'do~ ' it > 1ltn M of {h8#' coatr`ave r hen Arid Lewisville lakes, The .'lake is A' d ihg 4& 6. be, nngg buflf as a, water supply ies- . I - . ervofr,fol .the two'c1Nee and tttoy+' e responsible for pl!fividlhg', root ation areas 'I`he pops' it Would' pe i4 era the Tls:carps has daneits Ras Departme4, ntpp of )?arks apet remain above the ,batfj'_ - it( Wildlife, lifting a: huge' -future ev'Aluste the oropg5M Wely•fr0 'a expense' from 'the', city govern, technical ` Vlewpairt,t. the project ments. cgntinues., to be under consid. But the gree6belt would come at 'ration, v[th a dQCistott expected'lsl the expete of t8ndowt►era; alptng Julie. C;Ja';ps 'officials won't oo 'I the river, anct they made it filear", meht 'dh 'how {fie 'study is pjo very i 'lt qulckly that thf> yOrMT gressJng, q,arvragti,}iT With ~ ideA, " ' as were ' naunlcipnj officials tit,oar{wtlilo, the lake itself raps % 1)enWn t lh eP>n l'i'on 'stUl of= ! of ~i "although.'1! p>'opobal wai fora 1 y`' l ed orttoyorgbenbr " turn!" k with few ; ad 1 ` S the Ig is 'tloullpackNt4nYSsu'ettaefi~,~pt~' et~d.~tso~edUleibut'bA'c~t~'v' fhb! ..and Will ' tallies; ;;r'es[deptg ob<, bath to ,t}ie yea'? sloWeti ~ Elie Jeetcllto a'q lnnfiu>t of thousands'of,': haexvati high' d ,e 4r'rot~cdlnagd Its ejtto p ll ar'the oqf{ city dwellers' Urbanlieswould Just, bn` at• million cubic yards of dli't tress up the L' area's: aural mosphere, they declared, and:. rerYeovedperday, probably dri* And 'take d>UP M,:, The. lak0 !s expected .to well I~vi., ' r 74„~ tnl>afoh alt , B dna ,o€ water data $01ronmeotAilsw and'treptel; t4 Denton fin, DOllaas,., w1 .26 eerie#ive8 front both cities wetghed prrcent` Com#no Benton and 14 'on the In side, of the'greenaelt,,The . pereenttoDallas, Denton, City Couriell ;formally en dossed the proposal In a msolgUo When r cat~pl led I L q' earthen and has begun' to annoy'-land darn, Which has, a concrete, base abutting the,'prnposed corridor on and suetlon tube that c0u18 a 11' i' the southern end. City officialy. Denton to .Install a hydroet aye hinted that they won't;stop• s{atlon at some1tUC,R data, t` ere. 141 feat h3}th.' ' County, offlelals say that makiug Total cost of the dam, the lake the pyopo,,ed'1,8Q0-acre site a state and land purchases is estimated at park would remove land from the $380 Million, Land Improvements county tax rolls that would have to and relocations have cost .#166 be made pp in higher taxes on tile, ' trillion and several' condemnation remaining roperty,, And some lawsuits still 'await reuolutlop•'in' people juxt Oan't want to,seo more fedchl district caurk In Sherman; I Page 8Gi DENTON R ECVRl1-(:HRONICLHr Sunday, Japvary 29, In# oa'b" g yaer ezw: ; ~s ~i~T~~'~*4~ .~_.a t 64°`x& taa a'~t,^i lost Ic a='a~ .,8n ~ ti? t ~ :r• y a IN ~~y~kad!i°~~'`~ l~ k 2YS {^x t 3 { :N~ t R ~1 ~.1. 4 i ~v'1 vtSa~ t4ti..i ~ A i ' r •.z? ~ i •~.F'. i, r'.`rn atc.. •3:' r 'h ~i'~~ ~T, t VW. tC 1 ~ to F` ~ ~z ,RIa,}~ $ra~YL cP~',~" •atii'`!kt ~¢~,~s~v ~sti,~.r~a Y.'~t~~i N:i F- v ~17~ .i H !}a 1a '.i ✓ iii J lid:' t z, ~ y~14i'7 q3~ ~ Z~b v t i r ti 7 Y i t f c:. ss&~ T r uS~! 1~ ~tL ty y r a ~ , ~ Y,i tJ twJ ~ypCb$ 'e r`e ti~~t d Y,F z ~ > 7 r f ~ ~ ° nz~ it c e'~$ 0w Sag lr~ A i w~°~rd°' IY¢~ ~ J'i i+~l'NiF l ~ 1x yt~.. 9 r~ ~~a Y • i. c^ L n ~ i i , ~ r Fl ~1 N4 lv d Yi 1 d~`I'~ jyav.. p i tt s J n R ~r f<ri ~ d i R G L7t i i ~ ,f S,a o.r r f y f3 N~1~'.r '•fiv ~K r3 r. I6a .1 .2"; ` nt' 1 ~ 4f ~f f~1a+ •-.1 T`D'S e. 7 i v f. ! Y cA { ~ ' A v :~Cv a. a 6';~ . t c h 1 ~ rk r r ~~Y, ~ sk a r r w E~>4Gr. _,j r~ i i tyz x, ~ gay ` ~tq t ~ #i.S ,a*i t~ #~1 va ~v.7. S d{Y_ r1fa+'ti r p l OM construction ilt r2ay Ro5erts take, where ?he' work is almost a year aheac. ut schedule. J I _7 -I 1 BGT'w 1985-8b Gen, Govt;, BUDGET PROPOSAL i i "~yvdw~•+p^n~T'•f~ ..au: va~.r...a,,w. / r,. M ~ ~ n i i 1 E` I I 1 f a ■ c 10 j. 1 i , l ~ 1r E ~ i i THE CITY 0b1 DENTON GENERAL GOVERNMENT FY 85/86 BUDGET PROPOSAL v j 1 Sn j r General Government September 6, 1985 I ; y E PISCAI YEAR ANNUAL 3UDGET 1 PAGE 7 f 98 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS AR oEPAararMEr~r Gen , Govt , DIVISION 1 Gen. Govt. I ~ GENW1 GOVE MENT CITY MANAGER' S OFFICE s * FY 8S/86 BUDGET t Table of Contents Pale k Organization Chart . . . . . . . . 2 P Departmental Budget Narrative 3 t Departmental Ranking Summary . 4 Current Funding Level Decision Package S 3 Expenditure Detail 6 I Supplemental Decision Package (Employee Newsletter)(R) 10 a Supplemental Decision Package_ (Advisory Boards and Commissions anque (tT 11 Supplemental. Decision Package (Council/Board Meetings) C 12 , I Supplemental Decision Package (Citizen Survey) (R) 13 r c Supplemental Decision Package (Council Travel) (R) 14 i Position Detail . . . . . . . . 16 } i Financial Outlook . . . . 17 1 Salary Calculation Detail (Back-up). 2 i j 1 General Government Ciq Manager's Office May 10, 1995 k CITY OF DENTON sr i F 1 f FiscAi rEAR ANNUAL 9UDGET 1985-1986 PAGE DEPAEQTMENT ORGANIZATION CHART 2 7 Gen, Govt. - OF - CITY MANA flE:R ASSISTANT CITY ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER MANAGER C I T Y SECRETARY \ ADMINISTRATIV{: ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE, d SECRETARY ASSISTANT INTERN 1 1 t 1 SR. SHRETARY SECRETARY ` (IPT) f CITY OF DENTON ~.ntti~+~Gt✓J"4tllri h.;d S+t.n S~'., ,,aa....;r,.. I a , U~t "t r v V 3 1 I 3of17 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET NARRATIVE .J .ail 1~I Program Desoriptinn I' The General Government Department provides for the general administration of all operations of the City. In addition, it functions as a liaison between Administration and the City Policy Making Branch. The staffing support needed for the filing, maintenance and retention of all City official dooumentc is ? also funded through this department. Budget funds requested for 1985-86 to t maintain the current level of services in these programs is 47000591 representing a 8.5% increase over the target level. The major expenditures (other than personal services) of this department are special services and support items to the City Council,. In addition to the routine expenses, this department is responsible for the expenditures incurred with City Council meetings and elections, City business related council travel, ordinance supplements, and Council Commission banquet. These items approximately 39% of the non-personnel related expenditures, { Expenditure Summa 1985/86 1985/86 1935/86 y CURRENT SERVICE TOTAL 1984/85 1984/85 BUDGET ESTbKATE FUNDING CONTINUATION REQUEST j Personal 297t463 296,11-A 334o426 334o426 3'34 ,426 Services 22,580 24,622 27 0802 27t802 Supplies 22'580 ftintenanos 800 800 800 580 580 I 0 Services 109,510 119,810 929963 154 9938 70 154,9 738 Servi Insurance 50 50 70 20,290 ; 18 ,800 9t650 20,290 Sundry 182800 7 9528 j -t28 7,5280 Fixed Assets 2425 2-t425 - - 7 5 TOTAL 4571,408 460 ,358 4709059 454o854 4T4 ,854 Staffin S 1985/86 1985/86 1985/86 1984/85 CURRENT CURRENT TOTAL - .1984/85 BUDGET ESTIA ATE FUNDING SERVICE REQUEST j ~ 8 8 8 9 8 Authorized Positions 9 9 9 9 9 Worker Years 1 Avg. Annual Salary 37t!82 37 9182 41,803 41,803 41P803 i i 9/06/84 4 1 i i t i 1 ~scAl YEAR ANNUAL. BUDGET PACE 4 OF l 1.985-1.986 DEPARTMENTAL RANKING LX+~ARTM[NT SUMMARY DIVISION ~ , Gen. Govt. Gen. Govt. f PCIiLTION! TQTAL. G3IMULATIV[ RANK OCCISM PACKAO[ IX!•[1~ITU11[! TOTAL. "W low =7 f ,I t~ Current Funding Level tiJ General Government 9 0 4 $470,059.00 0u,Ulmsntal Packages: w 1. Employee Newsletter (R) 3,180.00 473,239.00 21 Advisory Boards and r Commission Banquet (R) 3,000.00 476.,239.00 3. Council/Board Meetings (R) 7,640.00 483,879.00 4. Special Servicoa (R) 3,400.00 487,173.00 Citizen Attitude Survey ` ($3,400) z ° 5. City Council Travel (R) 58,575.00 545,854.00 Travel ($54,000) Registration ($8x875) r (Schoolo & Seminars) j I f f i t TOTAL 9 0 9 545,854.00 I i 1 } i I /6/84 CITY OF DENTON F BF-13 { FiscaL YEAR ANNUAL BUDGET 5 Rate. 7 Of CURRENT FUNDING LEVEL _ 1985-1986 oaPuerMVar DECISION PACKAGE Gen- avid ov t . j Gen. Govt 1 Program Description The General Government Department provides for the general administration of all operations of the City. It also serves as liaison to the policy making branch and f the administrative branch of the City and provides an office for the filing and retention of official records. 1983/84 1984/85 1984/85 1985/86 ' Performance Measures ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE CURRENT £ Worker Years 8 8 8 E` Average Annual Salary 35#376 35,376 41,803 41 603 S Council Meetings 36 38 38e Boards Supported 22 22 22 22 j Council Minutes 36 36 36 36 Permits Issued 5831 250 250 250 e Expenditure Summary 1983/84 1984/85 1984/85 1985/86 ACTUAL BUDGET ESTMATE CURRENT 3 Perervioes 283,008 297,463 296,113 334,426 E r Supplies 22,580 22,580 22,580 24.622 1 200 580 580 800 e Aaintenance + Sorvioes 99,496 109#510 119+810 92,963 J Insurance 50 50 50 70 Sundry lb 1816 18 #800 18,800 9o650 Fixed Assets 5#850 J2,425 2,425 7#528 TOTAL 429#000 451#408 460#358 470,059 € t i 3; •t 1New application system and police warrant cheeks resulted in a reduction in the number of permits issued. S t CITY OF DENTON i r i Y VA ANNUAL BUDGET 19 85-1986 EXPENDITURE DETAIL PA~-o OWART49NT 6 of 1 7 7 Gen < ccvt ONIMON AGCOtJNT pfwn Gene Govt. NUMM ACCOUNT Tf U Yam ' YEGIA PROPOSM RFGl.1Ei$'C ACTUAL BuDwr NSTWAATg F UMNO C0 'r y 4 f 53 Peroo al Services ,t y 80-22 Of ioe/Clerical 490189 61,052 61,052 65 r"(98 6 80-24 Professional 18,098 5,798 80-25 Management/ 199562 14 x500 19,609 19,609 164 ,149 173 ,123 173 ,123 191037 Supervision 191,837 i 80-26 Temporary/Seasonal 11,587 6 r400 6o400 6 ,864 80-41 Overtime 6 ,864 t' 4018 4 ,632 4 ,632 80-51 Longevity 5,797 5 x797 1,484. 1x732 1 J 80-61 FICA ,757 1,868 1868 ' 13 , ,736 13,742 14454 190334 19 x334 , .80-62 7MRS 10,072 9,648 12,423 15,499 159499 80-64 . Worker' s Gomp, 246 80-65 Health/Life ins 593 593 386 386 5-=532 6 7,179. 7,9347,534 OTOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 278r411 297x463 296,113 334 ,426 334t426 , 1 } i CITY OF DENTON r I~ - - FtlOAL YlAR^ ANNUAL 6UC~GET PAGE EXPENDITURE DETAIL 1 1985-1986 DEPARTMENT ON41 R1 Gen. Govt. Gen. Govt. P43!C1R CURAV N"f YEAR PROPCam REQtNNST ACCOUNT NUM OR ACCOIXiT TTfl~ ACTUAL 9tJD(i~T EQTMA TE !'Uf~!►JNq YEAR Cumm am= CONTNUAI'1q! SUP LIES r 81-01 Office Supplies 15 ,317 17p929 l`j 1929 20 ,780 20P780 s 81-02 Hooke, Magazines 616 841 841 2,267 2,267 81-09 Postage 752 1 ,100 1,100 I P475 1,475 ra n, 81-10 Freight 0 50 50 100 100 6 81-11 Janitorial 0 0 0 0 0 t 81-13 Comp, Forma 0 0 0 0 0 a 81-15 Film 100 260 260 0 300 `j 81.17 Meoh,-Eleo. 0 0 0 0 0 i 81-18 Em,R loyee Newsletter. 1p651 2,400 2,400 0 2_80 TOTAL SUPPLIES 18 ,436 22P580 22o580 24j622 27,802 MAIN NANCE l 83-01 Building/Equipment 0 200 200 200 200 83-40 Furniture/Fixtures 150 0 0 0 0 83-41 Office Xachines 350 380 380 600 600 TOTAL MAINTENANCE 500 580 580 800 800 s j { CRY OF DENTON . ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE YEM 8 0 17 ' EXPENDITURE DETAIL - 1985-1986 oN161DM ~i ~At Gen. Govt. ; Gen . Gov to IIR pfippg88 REQ(XBT MOR Y IC9 ` . ACCOUNT ACCOUNT THE AQ BUDGET 85TIMATE ¢1d CONTT4UATIOD NUMMM 3p r e r` ry N' R ~ ~j S RVICES '1~~ f• !jJ 10 ,600 E 85-01 Telephone 10,024 10 ,000 10,000 10 ,600 E 85- 02 Special Services 4,2u1 7 ,i00 7,100 5,830 9p230 38s849 40,002 50002 349322 84 ,022 3 85-03 'Gravel Expenses 85.04 Advertising 419 39500 3P500 3o500 3 ,500 1 Dues & Publications 16 9139 l5 ,767 15o767 18,238 16,238 85-05 ! w 0 0 8 ,571 8A1 8t491 85-09 Rent of Equipment 65_13 Expense Allowance 8,745 9,720 9 x720 10,200 10,200 14,930 10,273 19,148 85-22 Sohoals & Seminars 14,227 14,930 119,810 92 , 963 154, ,938 TOTAL SERVICES 1010175 109x510 i 'i k E 750L;RPNCS 50 70 70 u 88-15 Faithful Performance i Bond 0 50 50 70 70 1 TOTAL INSURANCE CITY OF DENTON r _ ANNUAL BUDGET Aae p 7- F~ PnCAL. YVAR 9 of 17 EXPENDITURE DETAIL I9 5-1986 Ot~A~TTAARNT ONMlION r, Gen. Govt. Gen, Govt.{ ACCOUNT PRIO~t CUi VW YEAR PROPW® Re"ST I ACCOUNT rma YW NUIAW ACt" a wanT EVATS ao T~+ A UNARY 89-05 Servioe Awards/Gifts 67 100 100 100 100 89-16 Counoil/Board Meetings 6 ,872 7,000 7,000 0 7 ,640 89-17 Election Expenses 4015 80500 8,500 9,000 91000 89-22 City Ord. Supplement 669 500 500 550 550 89-23 Misoellaneous (Board Ba lquet) _ 2,3501 2 ,700 2 ,700 0 3 ,000 i TOTAL SUNDRY 14P424 180800 18 pac 9t650 20 ,290 3 FIXED ASSETS c i~ a 9101 Building/Equipment 0. 0 0• 0 0 ► 91-02 Furniture/Fixtures 4o831 2o425 2P425 7t426 7o428 91-03 Office Machines 1 9 U 0 100 100 r r t TOTAL FIXED ASSETS 6,761 2,425 2,425 7,528 7,528 ~ j t R i TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 419,707 4511448 460x358 470,059 5451854 ~a CSTY OR DENTON i ANNUAL BUDGET = ~ ; fisCAL YEAR 10 19$3 81 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION aw»uoK r PACKAGE Gen. Gov. lj0 TITLE: EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER (R) PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The funds proposed for this package will allow the staff to con- i " h tinue printing and distributing 700 employee newsletters monthly. The newoletter is an important form of communication between managers i ,~11 and employees. Distributed Monthly_ No, of Newslettexa Annually No. 700 Measure 12 ! t Expenditure Detail ' ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION _ REQUEST ,mot FILM 81-15 $ 300.00 PRINTING 81.18 $ 2880.00 TOTAL REQUEST $'3t80,O0 ~i i { g S r CITY OF DENTON j j P i F!lCAL YEAR ANNUAL. BUDGET aAaE 1985-1986 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION L t OErAlIYi1LRNT PACKAGE Gen. Govt.` Gen. Govt. t s I~k TITLE: ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS BANQUET (R) PROORAN DESCRIPTION s The current funding level does not provide any funds to sponsor a Boards and ^i` Commioeiona Banquet. This item is requested to be restored in funding. The S banquet is scheduled for 300 people, The Boards and Commissions Banquet provides an excellent opportunity to recognize citizens for their ' contributions to the City of Denton by serving on one of the city's 22 advisory boards. It is the only City. sponsored function which allows all of the various boards to meet at a single event, The Banquet is vital to the oity' s efforts of promoting positive public relations by expressing appreciation for the work of Board members. 1 Expenditure Detail , ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION REQUEST BOARDS BANQUET 89-23 ,,000,00 TOTAL REQUEST $3P000,00 of ! k S f 179% 9/06/84 35~) u: r,l+ i r' CITY OR DENTON I E ;f ANNUAL, !l11008T FISCAL Y"A FOM 12 {s SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION OF 1~8Sw1986 PACKAGE ava+ M Gen. Gov C. Gen. Govt. r.~ e) 'title; Counoil/Board Meetings(R) i hE Program Description; A total of $7,640.00 is requested to restore the funds to maintain support services for Council and Board Mestinge so that the Council may better serve the Citizens of Denton. Expenditure Detail Account Desoription Request 89-16 1. Meals for Council Meetings (38) 49940 i 2. Coffee/Beverage Service 840 3. Food Items in addition to meals 800 t 4. Courier Service 10100 TOTAL RAQUEST 7t640 4 f j l~ { f CITY OF DOMN r., 8F-4t r ANNUAL BUDOET FISCAL YEAR "a, 1985-1986 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION o'~ - TM T PACKAGE 01VISION Gen, Govt, Gen, Govt , A j TITLEt SPECIAL SERVICES - CITIZEN SURVEY (R) a;5 j I: YF PRQGRAiK DESCRIPTIONS ti 3 The current funding level does not provide any funds for the following special projeotj Citizen Attitude Survey $3,400 The citizen attitude survey is conducted annually to provide information i concerning the citizen'.s perception of services provided by the city of Denton. Approximately 400 citizens are interviewed tn this survey. This survey is essential to identifying problem areas of the city. The survey also indicates whether or not services are being effectively delivered. The citizen survey is important to helping the council and staff plan for future improvements. { 4:K endit•ire Detail, ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION M REMST s SPECIAL SWRVICES 85-02 $3400.00 h TOTAL REQUEST $3,400.00 51 r t ' C4- la t 1 t i 1793M 9/06/84 h zf, is CITY OF DENTON 7 k i t ANNUAL 9UCOET - M~ c , FISCAL YEAH (0001985-1986 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION ~°f F~CKAGE OIYtSIG Gen. Govt. Gen. Govt. , } V i f e. . Sp e ,q TITLEt CITY COUNCIL TRAVEL (R) PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: r~ In order for Council members to stay abreast of the most current approaches to local government management, a total of $62,875 is requested to continue this vital servioe for the citizens of 'Denton. This amount includes registration, airfare, ground transfers, meals, and other miscellaneous expenses accrued. We are requesting funding based on the expectation that all members of Council will attend each eonferenoe or seminar that they have historically attended. ` In past budgets, we have been too conservative and have not budgeted enough money to cover all travel expenses that have occurred. This inadequacy has been corrected in this request. A detailed list of oonferenees/seminars, and registration.feee Appears below. { Expenditure Detail_ ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION REQUEST g 85-03 1. APPA (t) Toronto, Ontario $100800 2. NLC (7) Seattle., Wash. 12,050 3. NLC Fall Conf. (Y), D,C. 12,700 4. 'II+[L Region 8 meetings (7) 150 5. W L (7) San Antonio 6,400 6. U.S. Conf. of Kayors (1) Sas, Juan, P.R. 2,000 7. Mayors' Leadership Inst. (1) Washington, D.C, 11800 j 8. Conference cf Mayors (1) 1 Washington, D.C. 1,800 ti 9. Contingent trips 2,000 49J00 TOTAL COUNCIL TRAVEL t f CITY of DENTON I 8F-41 I I f 1 L FISCAL YEAR ANNUAL 9000E7 X 985- 1986 SUPPLEMENTAL, DECISION en. Govt X0«17 G . 01v1yfON 9 PACKAGE F lr Gen. Govt. jtA F855--2222' 10 APPA ('r) 2. NLC (7) Seattle, Wash. ~2r000 3. NLC Washington, D.C. 1,500 4. 24L 7 San Antonio 2'1~ 5, U.S. Conf. of Mayors 1x225 f (1), San Juan, P.R. 250 6. U,S, Conf. of Mayors (1) Washington, D,C. 150 7, Mayors' Leadership Inst. 250 8. qML Council, Mayors, Inst, y` 1,400 i TOTAL COUNCIL SCHOOLS & SkXINARS 8t875 IMPACT OF FAILURE Mn APPROVE r < . 1f this packet is not approved, Council will not be able to continue to represent the interests of th.) oitizens of Denton at aonferenoes and seminars s and will not to the gain the valuable information from these meetings which contribute professionalism of our city government, fi i 2272M 4/26/85 TOTAL REQUEST $6 r 75 t~ J 1 f} r { 1 j r r ;si BF-41 CITY OF DENTON p ' S ANNUAL. BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 1.(=.POPEI.Z. , (1985-1986 POSITION DETAIL DEPARTMENT DIVISION ol~ Gen. Govt`. I„ Dian, Govt. .'I 1 r,' C MNBER POSITIONS STATUS CURRENT RESTORATION NEW t 1 City Manager PFT 2080 0 0 I 2 Asst. City Managers PFT 4160 0 0 k' Y 1 City Secretary PFT 2080 0 0 y, 1 Adm. Secretary PFT 2080 0 0 A i Adm. Assistant PFT 2080 0 0 1 Sr. Secretary PFT 2080 0 0 { 1 Secretary PPT 1040 0 0 1 Adm, Intern TPT 1320 0 0 a NEW POSITIONS: NONE i TOTAL FlOM REQUESTED: 16,920 } R ~s i 3 2272M 9/06/84 CITY OF DE NTON 1 , ANNUAL BUDGET 17 PAGE OF 17 FISCAL. YEAR 1985-1986 FINAN '1AL OUTLOOK OmSION DEPARTMENT Gen. Govt r ` Gen. Govt , EXPENDITURE ALLOCATION SECTION ALLOCATION FOR 1985-86 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP t? 8 12 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Konthly % e 8 24 36 42 50 58 64 72 84 92 10a Cumulative % 8 16 • iMANDATORY pRCGItAK CHANGES THROUGH 1987-881 " the City This department functions aocording to the standards set down No mandatory Charter in compliance with federal, state and local laws, , program foreseen at this time that would directly impact the changes are expenditure allocation of this department. PROGRA<`i CHANGES NEEDED TO MAINTAIN SERVICE THROUGH 1987-88 Over the next five year period, it is pro eoted that the staffing level could be increased by adding one full-time clerical support position to provide and f professional assistance with tary' s ffice. The itoeB, tal oeitizen stimated pcosts for r other duties of the City Secretary' f this program change would be $12,272, for FY 86/87. I PROGRAA `JHA4GES FOR NEEDED SERVICE LAPROVE43NT THROUGH .1987-88 Continued service improvement is expected to be covered within the current budget estimates assuming there is an approximate 8% increase in funds each ~j fiscal ,year, i` } SUAMARY BY EXPENDITURES 86/87 87/88 r 1983/84 84/85 85/86 8 8 g 9 9 f WORKER YEARS ! 1 BUDGETS 87/88 88/89 r 84/85 85/86 86/87 -O- -0- I Personal Services -0- $5'20a 12 ,272 -0- -0- Operlkt1,, oas 0- -0- -0- ~ ti Fixed Assets 2...,._. ~4~- - --0-- - I TOTAL $ $2,425 $5,200 $12,272 $ -0- -0- 22724 r 1 9/66//84 CITY OF DENTON ' GENERAL GOVER19"T CITY gANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP } Page l of 22 _ GENERAL GOVERMENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET SACK-UP i t , PERSONAL SERVICES 'r 80-22 OFFICE CLERICALS Charlotte Allen 19,346 Laurie Jaokson 16,135 Jennifer Imrie 7 Q4 F Jane Fletoher ti TOTAL OFFIOV, CLERIOAL t, rj . f 80-24 PROFESSIONAL: 19 '609 L.- Bryan C. Stusrt TOTAL PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMFINT/SUPERVISION t 80-25 i 69r752 Chris Hartung 60,351 i Betty MvKean 61,234 Rick Ivehla O. 33 TOTAL MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISION " 80-26 TEMPORARY/SEASONAL $ 6p864 ti Mark McDaniel TOTAL TE+i.PORARY/SEASONAL 80.41 OVERTIM E 80-51 I,ONG Y ,3- SU-61 FICA , 99 %8Q-62 4M RS ~S 80- WORKER'S S COMP. ? 80-65 HEALTH/LIFE INS. IT s. ~3 41426 i X334 ,426 j TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES GENERAL GOVERNMT CITY MAN C+ 'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 2 of 22 PERSONAJ, 3g1tVICES Office/Clerical Account Number 80'21 , JOB TI City Secretary $ 120408 511/86 Salary: 10/1/85 thru ours Names C. Allen $ 10344 hour Y thru 9/30/86 9,530 5/2/86 /hour x ~~oura 1 $ 21,938 t{ TOTAL SALARY h s Overtime 10.55X of l?vertimes $ 3,119 annual sa ary 252 i 63 months x $4,00/120- Longevity: $ (Salary + longevity + OT) FICA: $ 1,784 x 1.05% I# 7 t 1 $ (Salary + longevity + OT) 5 TMRSs $ 1,455 .75X 1 t. (salary + longevity + OT) Worker's $ 35 x .14% comp.: " $ 5.70 s 112 2 Insurances $ 877 + longevity) Benefit 1}265 i (Salary Adjustment $ 5 X ~ Y $ 30ollS TOTAL 10 s t. s GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BtCK-UP ~ Pagel 3 of 22 ~ { PERSONAL SERVICES Office/Clerical V~ Account Number 80-22 JOB TITLEi Secretary (PPT) 487 Names J. Fletcher 10/1/85 thou 10/30/85 Salary: i $ 6.09 /hour x .'S Fours p 11/1/8 thou 9/30/86 /hour x J3U'_ hours $ 6,17 TOTAL SALARY 6660 Overtime 177 hours annually Overtimes $ 1,139 (Salary + OT7 x .05% FICAS 470 (Salary + OT) x 5.75% TMRSt 449 tF _ (Salary + OT) Cworker's q omp.t it x .14X f 4.56 z 12 + - x 12 Insurance. $ 342 I Benefit R (Salary + OT) x 5 % Adjustment $ 454 i F TOTAL $ 9Y525 r. C i V, i i; GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 4 of 22 { PERSONAL SERVICES --Office/Clerical Account Number 80-22 i JOB TIITLL.s Senior Secretary i ' Naves J. Iarie 10/1/85 thru 7/31/86 Salarys 12x883 $ 7_ _ .32 /hour x 176 3 hours 8/1/86 thru 9/34/86 3-"7 7'' /hour PZU ours $ 2 461 TOTAL SALARY $ 159344 Overtime 36 hours annually Overtimes $ 414 13~ months x $4.00/mo. Longevitys $ 52 (Salary + longevity + OT) t x 7.05% FICA: .1,115 lr,. (Salary + longevity + OT) ` x 5.75% TARS: $ 909 (Salary + longevity + OT) Worker's _ x .14% Comps $ 22 $ 5.70 x 12 ,a + $ 6... 9 x 12 Insurances $ 877 { k (Salary + longevity) Benefit x 5 % Adjustment $ 791 # TOTAL $ 19,525 4 I i; y I ~ 9 i f l F, c t f i t R GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 5 of 22 i PERSONAL SERVICES Office/Clerical > Account Number 80-22 JQB_TITLEs Administrative Secretary Names L. Jackson 10/1/85 thru 12/1/85 Salary: $ 21682 $ $8.38 /hour x 2 ho+xrs 12/2/85 thru 9/30/86 37 /hour'~hours $ 15,523 x. - TOTAL SAIMY $ 18,205 Overtime 85 hours annually Overtimes $ 10125 24 months x $4.00/mo. LongavilzYs $ 96 (Salary + longevity + OT) sry 7.05% PICA, $ 19370 (Salary + longevity + OT) ~1I7 a 5.75% TMRS: $ 1 (Salary + longevity + OT) Worker's $ 28 - - x • ?.4X Comp. f $ 5.70 x 12 $ 877 + $ 6_..7------ x 12 Taaurance! (Salary + longevity) Benefit x 5 % Adjustment $ 1,141 of TOTAL $ 23,959 I { f s t ;f GENERAL GOVERNMFIn CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 6 of 22 PERSONAL gERVIcES Professional Account Number 80-24 l {F JOB TITLES Admini.strative Assistant aYatyt 7,621 Names B. Stuart 081665 th%hour x3/8/86 ours 3/8/86 thru 9130/86 $ 10,895 yt~ T-7 ho TOTAL SALARY 18 , 517 ~i ;a 36 f 9 months x $4.00/mo. Longevity: $ (Salary + longevity) _ x 7.05% FICA: $ 10308 r f1 a (Salary + longevity) TMRSs $ 10067 f,..rd x 5.75% x. (Salary + longevity) Worker's 26 1 x .14% Comp.s N ` 5.70 x 12 12 Tasurances $ 877 x c Salary X longevity) Benefit Adjustment $ 1,Q92 l $ 22,923 TOTAL r i i f 1 22 d r iI`M GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP ® Page 7 of 22 PERSONAL SERVICES Management/Supervision JIf Account Number 80-25 JOB_'rITLEs City Manager Names C. Hartung 10/1/85 thru 9/30/86 Salary: $ 65,936 * {s $ 31.70 /hour x 2080 hours =i f., TOTAL SALARY $ 65,936 I! 99 months x $4.00/mo. Longevity: $ 396 (Salary + longevity) x 7.45% FICA: $ 41676 -.1 (Salary + longevity) x 5.75% TMRSs $ 3,814 z tJ (Salary + longevity) Worker's x .14% Compel $ 93 i. l s $Saa + $ Insurancei'l $ 1,410 y f (Salary + longevity) Benefit z 5 % Adjustment $ 3,816 TOTAL $ 800141 t Y Y 1 3 a h F } I~ I, GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 8 of 22 i i PERSONAL SERVICES Management/Supervision Account Number 80-25 JOB TITLE: Assistant City Manager r `S Nape: H. McKean 1011185 thru 1/1/86 Salary$ 12,691 26.44 /hour z 1480 hours 1/2/86 thru 9/30/86 /hour-7-707'houru 44,352 TOTAL SALARY $ 579043 i ~8`8 months s $4.00/mo. Longevity: $ 352 (Sftlary + longevity) x 7.05% FICA: $ 40046 t _ iSalary + longevity) r z 5.75% TMRS3 $ 3,300 t f y (Salary + longev'..ty) Worker's s .14% Comp.: $ 80 $ 524 + $ Insurance: # 1+333 (Salary t longevity) Benefit ` : 5 % Adjustment $ 30308 t TOTAL t 69,462 M x 1 F~ s, G d ! GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP. Page 9 of 22 PERSONAL SERVICES Account Number 80-25 JOB TITLE: Assistant City Manager 26,208 10/1/85 thru 1/1/86 Salary: h Name: R. Svehla 27,30 /hour x ouxs i ' 1/2/86 thru 9/30/86 ,110 67' /hour, x- hours $ 32 $ 58,318 TOTAL SALARY t~ s~ ' 151 months z $4.00/mo. Longevity: $ 604 (Salary + longevity) 4,154 x 7.05% FICA: 6 (salary + longevity) 5.75% TMRS: $ 3,388 x (Salary + longevity) Wor'ker's $ 82 x .14X Comps $ 557 Insurance: $ 1,341 I + longevity) Benefit {Salary AdJustment $ 2,916 x 5 % $ TOTAL 700843 ~ f ' ~ r t F' ~ g 4 , f I r , I i P GENERAL GOVERMENT OITY i4ANAGER' S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 10 of 22 AftPERSONAL SERVICES Temporary/Seasonal Aooount Number 80-26 JOB TITLE; Administrative Intern I r Names 14. KoDaniel 10/l/85 thru 9/31/86 Salary: $ 6,864 5.20 /hour x 1320 hours t TOTAL SALARY 6 ,864 (Salary) x 7.05% FICA: 484 (Salary) Worker's x .14% Comp.: 10 x 12 r, + x 12 Insuranoe: (Salary + longevity) Benefit 9 x 5 % Adjustment $ 0 ^i TOTAL 7,358 t F Y f_ i S r 5 r A - - - - r I GENERAL GOVERIOMENT CITY MANAGER' S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 11 of 22 SUPPLIES $1-01 OFFICE SUPPLIES COPY COSTS t City council agendas avg. copies per meeting: 175 Total Council copies 10575 x .04 $ 6,3u0 CMO Co fes -t aver9ge 100 copies per month Total CMO copies 1200 x .04 _ 4~.80tk DOTAL CO p y CASTS : $ 11,100 ra SUPPLIES i City Council misc. supplies, 240 +,a Council/Board minutes books 200 Supplies for microriche 00 ry CMO Microfiche 100 (240 supplies from Central Stores 5,940 General CMO Supplies 2,400 F j Graphic Layvwt Materials (Advertising, Brochures, citizen Response forms 400 printing of Citizen Response Form f ' 200 4 a TOTAL OFFICh SUPPLY CIISTS: _ 91680 , $ 20,580 20 780 TOTAL OFFICE SUPPLIES AND COPY COSTS k s i 1 1 Y I 1 I R r i 1 I (;l'.NERAL GOVERNMEAT t.ITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 12 of 22 I 81-02 SUPPLIES CONTINUED...... 81-02 *BOOKS & MAGAZINE : A.11 books & magazines must have the approval o t e s stant ity Manager before purchasing. All books, magazines, and publications which am not included in organizational dues are listed here. AMA Reports 125 Commun I 96 ( Community Newsletter 106 Creative Leadership 35 i, Creative Secretary 108 Dallas Morning News 100 Denton Record Chronicle (2) 130 Elected Officials Handbook 45 Exec, Local Government 55 3? Executive Report 100 Financial Survival (Ruff Times) 70 The Guide 50 ICMA Monthly 78 ICMA Report 26, Kiplinger Letter (2) 76 Masterco Press (ACM) 82 t Nightingale-Conant tapes 43 Office Profeasional 36 F Research Inst. of America 36 'J Strategic Planning Manual 130 Supervisory Management 36 A Target 69 } Texas Munic. Law Books 180 Unlimited Times 75 j Wall St. Journal 107 } Women's News 13 ` Working Woman 35 f Your Telephone Personality 25 Other books and magazines 250 TOTAL BOOKS AND MAGAZINES $2,267 $2,267 i S1-09 POSTAGEs These funds are used for postage costs, special ma"iYouCs, overnight express, Rates are estimated to increase to a 254 per 1 ounce item (first class) during this fiscal year and ti this is reflected in our estimate. We have also added an extra $100 for the mailing of the Citizen Response Form (R). k TOTAL POSTAGE $1,475 $1,475 f } 1 I f GENERAL GOVERNKENT ~l* CITY A NAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 13 of 22 81-10 SUPPLIES CONTINUED...-... 81-10 FREIGHT: This account covers C.O.D. mail, freight, postage, .PUS.,, eto. 4 TOTAL FREIGHT $ 100 $ 102 81-11 JANITORIAL; No longer budgeted in our department. TOTAL JANITORIAL 0 0 81-13 COMPUTER FOR0: This account is for computer forms which are no e longer charged to departments and thus has no budget allocation. r1 TOTAL CCMPUTER FORMS 0 0 r.~ 81-15 FILH: This allocation is to cover the costs of film and prooessing used in the employee newsletter. 'E s„ TOTAL FIIM $ 300 $ 300 t: 81-11 KECHANICAL-ELECTRICALt_ No longer budgeted in our department. 0 0 TOTAL MECH.-ELECT, h, t; 81-18 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTERi This account covers the coat of printing the emp oyes news a er and other news releases. { is 12 editions of the employee newsletter at 700 copies per month. ` TOTAL EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER $29880 880 TOTAL SUPPLIES: $ 27x802 i t .F S 3 k j {4k~ s 5 F . L 00 GENERAL GOVERN4ENT CITY MANAGER', S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK:-UP Page 14 of 22 Aftk 83-01 SUPPLIES CONINTUED...... MAINTENANCE 83-01 BULDING/EQUIPM ENT: This account covers MAINTENANCE to the EXIST 0 building and/or equipment. It does not provide for maintenance of furniture, draperies, and/or fixtures. The building is covered by Parks & Recreation. Total Building & Equipment: $200.00 a • • 83.,40 FURNITURE & FIXI'URESs TOTAL FURNITURE & FIXTURES $ -0- r 83-41 OFFICE MACHINES: Typewriters, calculators, microfiche reader-printer. TOTAL OFFICE MACHINES:$ 600 i3 y TOTAL M AINTENANCE:$800 $800 11 SERVICES: 85-01 TELEPHONE: These funds are used for telephone service based on the projections provided by the Finance Department. 10,600 1 t t 85-02 SPECIAL SERVICES: Strategic Planning $ 2,000 4 Citizen Survey(R) 3,400 *Council & Exec. Retreats 2 x700 r Microfilming of City records - ongoing from last year 500 *FY 84-85 Council tend Executive Retreat Speakers Council Retreat Two speakers with room and travel expenses and misc. i supplies { $1,400 Executive Retreat Two speakers with room and travel expenses and misc. L.j supplies ' $1,300 Health Club Membership (CM) (2ACX) $630 9t230 TOTAL SPECIAL SERVICES: $90230 y 1 GENERAL GOVERMENT CITY ,4ANAGER!S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 15 of 22 AML 83_03 SERVICES CONINTUE 85-,03 TRAVEL EXP NSE: Any travel expenalture that is not listed below will. royal by the Assistant City Manager. Costs listed need special app ortation, meals, and below include airfare, hotel, trans pp miscellaneous expenses incurred during tray: CITY M ANAGER_ T~ L 3 APPA Annual meeting) 19594 2,625 M 5 APPA Two 'oc erd moe tings 2,O50 Ia4A (Philadelphia) 200 Misc. to Austin 10 League of Cities (Seattle) 1,7 sa Nat. 1,445 E IiLC (Congressional/City Mtg.) 1,062 TRKA t; Texas Mu:licipal League CRnv,(San 950 { Antonio) 300 City Council retreat 304 Exec, Staff Retreat ' 12,236 TOTAL CITY MANAGER TRAVEL i s ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER M`CKEAN: (All CQ0 rent Fund) AKAA,~ M"'`ment Course 10240 IN, ASPA 1,753 ASTD 72 Denton Personnel Assoc, T? Women's Network 20050 { IN A 1 ,780 Economic Development 240 Other related COG 950 P Texas Munioipal League Conv. 1, Tal A 300 300 City Council retreat 300 1 J Exec. Staff retreat 200 r Misc, trips 1c, ,519 V 'DOTAL ASST. ;TTY AGR. idCKEAN } r 1 t. f ill tl k j t S a s ' } k i 1 I E GENERAL GOVERMENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 16 of 22 ASSISTAiT CITY MANAGER TRAVEL SVEM.A.: (All Current Fund) .Management Course 00 _ American Public Works Assoc. 11200 Ndtl. League of Cities 10700 Texas Municipal League) Conv. 950 I(MA (Philadelphia) 2,050 T(MA 1, 062 City Council retreat 300 Exec. Staff Retreat 300 Misc, trips 200 TOTAL ASST. CITY MGR. SyEHLA $ 80262 TOTAL MANAGIMENT TRAVEL $31,017 F' OTHER EXPENSES - 040 STAFF CITY SECRETARY TRAVEL: { 390 Local seminars 75 Election Law seminar 500 Texas Mun. League Conv. 390 N - TOTAL CITY SECRETARY TRAVEL $ 10355 AIMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY TRAVEL: Pro-of. Dev. Office Mot. $ S75 M' Prof. Dev, Tech. Skills SO Prof. Dev. (Assertiveness) 50 L $ _ SR. SECRETARY TRAVEL: t` trot: ev, puty Sec.) $ so Prof. Dev. (Time Management) 50. Prof. Dev; Tech. Skills) s0 f SECRETARY TRAVEL: ro,, v. e . Skills) $ 50 Prof. Dev. (Sec. Skills) 25 i TOTAL SECRETARY TRAVEL 75 AININISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TRAVEL: MANT Retreat $ 350 [MANT monthly mtgs. 250 d; Exec. retreat 200 Other Meetings (6) 150 'TOTAL FRP ASSISTANT TRAVEL $ M ATMINISTRATIVE INTERN TRAVEL: tti~~ sc. Mtgs. COG Arlington $ 100 , GENERAL GOVERRIENT CITY MANAGER',S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 17 of 22 85-03 SERV1038 CONTINTIED...... TOTAL ~JTY MANAGER'S OFFICE TRAVEL: 1_H'i`_P'3AGER TRAVEL 120236 ASST. CITY MGR. MCKEAN 10,519 ASST. C:,TY MGR. SVEHLA 8,263 Xr KANAGEH7~ 3"TffAVEL CITY SECRETARY TRAVEL $ 1,355 AtAIN. SECRETARY TRAVEL 675 SP.. SECRETARY TRAVEL 150 SECRETARY TRAVEL 75 ATIKIN, ASSISTANT TRAVEL 950 ArMINISTRATIVE IN'T'ERN TRAVEL 100 C SUB-TOTAL GAO SUPP RT S AFF TRAVEL$ 30 1p TOTAL CKO TRAVEL $ 34 ,322 tiR °i CITY COUN,','II, TRAVEJo (In Supplemental Package) Increases are due to increased cuno travelTZHT ail expenses being included in estimate: hotel, airfare, meals, ground transportation, and miscellaneous expenses incurred during travel. ?1 i 1. APPA (7) Toronto, Ontario $ 100800 2. NLC (7) Seattle, Wash. 12,050 3. NLC Fall Conf. (7) D.C. 12,700 4. 'ySL 2Region 8 meetings (7) 150 5. TML (7) San Antonio 6,400 6. U.S. Conf, of Mayors s (1):San Juan, P.R. 2,000 7. Mayor's Leadership Inst. (1) Washington, D.C. 1,800 8. Conference of Mayors (1) i Washington, D.C. 1,800 9. Contingent trips 2,000 ' TOTAL CITY COUNCIL TRAVEL $ 49,700 TOTAL CITY STAFF TRAVEL 33,712 { :.E TOTAL TRAVEL $ 84,022 84,022 t ¢ f Y! 85-04 ADVERRTiSINGi i Ordinances $125 per month $ 1,500 Election Advertising Coats (250 ea) 1,C30 Director/Division Head or Prof, Pos. 1,000 TOTAL ADVERTISING $ 3,500 ~ 3,500 I 4 i ` W,11 85-05 DUES & PUBLICATIONS: Asterisk denotes fees that have increased, All publications, i.e., magazines, periodicals, etc., are now E: budgeted under Books andMagazines. f 1 . GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 18 of 22 85-05 SERVICES CONTINUED.,,... 85-05 DUES & PUBLICATIONS1 * Denotes increase. A City Sec. & Admin. Sec.) 120 ASPA (Asst. City Manager) 95 C i ~Gld ASPA (City Manager) 95 - 'T~jLI'IW81dv ASTD (Asate City Manager) 135 moo American Forum on Self Govt. 100 r Amer. Soc. Civil Eng. 120* e American Mgmt. Assoc. (Execs) 675* s AMA Publication 11 Asec. of City Clerks & Sec. 25* `i Citizens Forum on Self Govt. 100 r•; Council for Int. Liason 48 Denton Personnel Assoc. 50 Gov. Finance Officers Assoc. 70* IABC (Adm. Assistant) 110 z ICMA (Execs) 1,275 f IPMA-National (Anat. City Mgr) 125 IPMA-North Tex. (Asst. City Mgr) 15* NAIOP (City Manager) 400 s; NAIOP-- North Texas 30* NCT Council of Governments 59220* r National League of Cities 12897 National Municipal League 140 (Council) Natl. Soc. Prof. Engineers 165 N. Tex. City Manager's Assoc. 30 Research Inst, of America 771 Sister Cities Intl. 300 Texas Ad. Comm. on Intl. Rels. 26 Texas City Manager's Assoc. 570 Texas Municipal. League 4,129* Texas Soc, prof. Engineers 16 U.S. Confereac9 of Mayors 10325 UMANT {Asst. City Manager,AA, & 3 Intern 50 TOTAL DUES AND PUBLICATIONG $ 18,238 $ 18,238 85-09 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT - Was uses in FY 1984-85 for Wang charges. This is not incTuaeT.n Ene-Z9686 budget. TOTAL RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT 0 G E i ~F r GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page lg of 22 3 85-13 SERVICES CONTINUED...... 85-13 EXPENSE ALLOWANCE: The funds in this account are allocated to the t e• y Manager and Assistant City Managers in addition to their salaries for automobile expenses. City Manager 41800 Asst. City Manager (McKean) 2:700 Asst. City Manager (Svehla) 2,700 s TOTAL EXPENSE ALLOWANCE t 100200 $ 10,200 f; 85-22 SCHOOLS & SEMINARS: This account covers registration costa for the atenca"nce a"t M seminars and training programs listed below. Raj CITY MANAGER: 280 "-"~.~i "('leas hington) APPA Annual 4200 00 Sr" ICMA Nat. Loague of Cities 250 s xi ~EX Monthly Mtga. 3X600 135 Texas Municipal League Conv. 100 40965 T= CM HUSTRELLON ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER MCKEAN: ? _ AMA Management Course $ 3500 00 ASPA j ASTD 3400 00 IPMA 150 5 E Nat. League of cities 135 TCMA Texas Muniei al League Conv. l` 140 TOTAL A (McKean) i ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER SVEHLAt AMA Management course t 500 American Public Works Assoc. 30u Contingent schools/seminars 200 ICMA 400 i r National League of Cities 250 Texas Municipal League Conv. 140 ` xcMA 135 TOTAL ACM S- A g lr ti TOTAL MANAGMENT SCHOOLS/SEMINARS 80815 1 N ~ s 1 a i E r ' y 1 I GENERAL GOVERR4ENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 20 of 22 85-22 SERVICES CONTINUED...... CITY MA;~IAGERH S SUPPORT STAFFS Certification Seminar Local (2) 150 City Secretary Seminar Election Law Seminar Austin 120 to , 50 Texas Mun. League Conv._ 130 TOTAL CITY SECRETARY T45~5 ? ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY Prof, Dev. Offioe Management} 230 Prof, Dev. (Tech. Skills) 95 { Prof. Dev. Assertiveness 95 ~a TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 420 I SR. SECRETARY Prof. Dev. ity Secretarial) 125 Prof, Dev. (Conflict Resolution) 90 Prof. Dev, (Tech. Skills) 65 r TOT sR. SECRET RY 280 SECRETARY ro . ev. (Tech. Skills} 70 Prof. Dev, (Sec, Skills) 30 TOTAL SECRETARY T 100 f ADA INISTRATIVE_ A86ISTANT IMANT Retreat - Salado 90 UMANT Mo. Mtge. 50 Other. Meetings 6) 60 ` r iI ANT CAO SUPPORT S'T'AFF (Subtotal) $ 1,455 TOTAL SCHOOLS a SEMINARS CM0 $ 10,270 a €i CITY COUNCIL u APPA 7 $ 21000 G; Conference of Mayors (1) San .Juan, Puerto Rico 250 Conf. of Mayors (D.C.) 150 Mayors Leadership Inst. 250 Natl. League of Cities (Seattle)(7) x,500 NLC (Washington, D.C.) 21100 qXL Council, Mayors, Inst. (7) 1,400 r # Texas M unioipal League (7) 1,225 TOTAL cUUNCIL SCH : S S $ TP-67 TOTAL SCHOOLS AND SE14INARS $ 19,145 ~ 19,145 r. TOTAL SERVICES $154,938 154,938 GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY MANAGER'S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 21 of 22 SERVICES CONTINUED',,... INSURANCE 88-15 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND $ 70 70 TOTAL INSURANCE $ 70 70 i4 SUNDRY 89-OS SERVICE AWARDS/SIFTS: , r - Keys to City ~Visitors) $ 100 100 MEETINGS: (Supplemental Package) (R) P { 89-16 COUNCIL/BOARD a s or council Meetings (38) at $130/meal Coffee/Beverage Service 800 Food Items in addition to meals 800 7 T`OT Courier Service 1 100 . 6 MEETINGS $ Y!b4U 71640 ~ 89-17 ELECTION E)MMES: City ounc ection $ 4,250 Run-Off Election 2,100 tit Spec. Called Election- 19050 1 600 Bond Election ~ $ 90000 i3 TOTAL'ELECI'IUN-EXPENSFS $ ` 80-22 CITY ORDINANCE SUPPLEMENT $ 550 $ 550 89-2~ MISCELLANEOUS (,BOARDS/COMMISSIONS BANQUET) 0(OSOitpplemental Package) 'DOTAL SUNDRY $ 20,290 $ 200290 ~i a t r I ~t u i t GENERAL GOVERPMEN'T CITY MANAGER' S FY 85/86 BUDGET BACK-UP Page 22 of 22 I FIXES SETS ; $ 0_~~ ; 91-01 DULDING/EQUIRi"Il s 91-02 FSIRNITURF & FIXTURES: anation for detail ,p. - e~u Be xp 7 4`5 $ 7X5 TOTAL FURNITURE/FIXTURES OFFICE MACHINES: $ 100 91-03 } aloulator $ f+ $ 1O0 100 ,j TOTAL OFFICE MACHINES 7 ,528 0f +52s TOTAL FIXED ASSETS: i $545 ,854 $545 ,854 .1 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERMKENT BUDGET: `tea f Gene cityrMalanageGove?rnment Y, ' April 30, 1985 22729 ~t x 1 i; 4 it is ;y dI r. 10 Y .1 COUNCIL 'T'RAVEL AND REGISTRATION AS OF 5-3-85 Fc i 4 Joe Alford Registration 528266..00 0 6 Travel A Mark Chew 526.00 Registration Travel 11332.20 r Charles Hopkins Registration 526.00 Travel 1,386.02 j Linnie McAdams r Registration 526,00 Travel 10408.20 f. ~ . Jim Riddlesperger Registration 526.04 Travel 994.40 Ray Stephens 526>00 ta. Registration Travel 3,043.84 I r Richard Stewart 1 1!6.00 f, Registration 1,1179.00 r. Travel f Summary Registration 4 332,00 Travel 16,172.39 a ii 2282M r t 4 j, 1 I I t t Joe Alford l National League of Cities-Indianapolis 1. Transportation 14.00 2 Taxi 25.00 3. Hotel 118.80 4. Meals- 24.88 5. Phone 13.55 6. Council Dinner 82.50 ' 7. Airfare 550.00 Total 8Z$:"T3 1 t ti a . x~ 0 i 3 i t E M 7sq !i s a 3@ v3 J a Mark Chew Texas Municipal League-Dallas c 1. Transportation 35.00 2. Meals 27.50 Total Texas Municipal League-Austin 1. Transportation 15.00 2. Taxi 7.00 3. Hotel 76.59 4. Meals 5. Airfare 36. 78,00 0 6. Legislative ;'Lunch 35.00 4 Total 2 .Y National League of Cities-Washington Is Transportation 14.00 2, Taxi 32.00 3. Hotel 210.00 ' 4. Meals 83.44 5. Phone 6. Airfare 65500..00 00 j Toted r, 1 S t S5 ,a { i . 1~Y 1 M Charles Hopkins Texas Mu►:icipal League-Dallas 17,50 Transportation 170.04 2. Hotel 14.23 ' ; 3, Meals 5.50 4, Auto Parking 8.00 5. Tips 213777 'O Total.' "J National League of Cities-lndi5~g51is 1, Taxi 158.40 2. Hotel 16.00 3, Tips 26.00 4, Tapes of Conf. 167.00 5. Council Meal Airfare 550.00 c b. T173-T5 Total Texas Municipal League-Austin 15,00 L, Transportation 9.50 , 1 1 2, Taxi. 76.95 3 Hotel 7.50 4, , Auto Parking 10.50 Tips 7$.00 6. Airfare 1~T•m Total } s yy i it Z a y: 4 t a V i I 1 - 00 Linni.e McAdams Texas Municipal League-Dallas 17.50 ortation 1, Tranap 170.04 r, 2. Hotel 3, Telephone 3.50 t 4. Parking Total islative Day-Austin Texas Library Association Leg 1.08 1, Taxi 55.00 2, Hotel 53.11 2 3, Meals 3.16 4 Tips Airfare 78.00 44 5. Total National League of Cities-Washington 4 ortation 15.00 f 1. Transp 17.50 3 2 Taxi . 310.00 3, Hotel 4, Meals 17.95 Telephone 2.00 x 5, 31.00 6, Auto Parking 4.00 7, Tips 65.68 8, Council Din.ler 550.00 9. Airfare 13.00 fl 10. Special Bkft. Total 107N.T6 'i 1 f r Li f~y 1 rrl1 1 F' r 1 i r E 1 P ON, F ~ Jim Riddlesperger , E Texas Municipal League-Dallas 1. Transportation 17.50 a 2. Hotel 170.04 3. Telephone .65 Total 188 t National League of Cities-Tnainappolis 1. Transportation 24.00 I~ 2. Taxi 8.00 ` 3. Hotel 158.40 S5 4. Meals 7.42 5. Council Meal :58.39 6. Airfare 550.00 Total 5027 e k j i to i 4.' j. 4 r~ t j 1 ~ a 1 ~ F t j G, r. 1 j i S J!" Ray Stephens ^ Texas Municipal League-San Antonio - 1981 1. Transportation 165.00 2. Hotel 117.70 r, 3. Mewls 127.50 h3 4. Auto Parking 6,00 Total 41 Texas Municipal League-Ft. Worth - 1982 f 1. Transportation 40.25 2. Hotel 104.86 3. Meals 100.00 4. Auto Parking 15.00 Total 260.11 National League of Cities- New Orleans - 1983 t~ 1. Transportation 268.75 2. Hotel 191.06 3. Meals 150.00 ' I 4. Phone 1.50 I 5. Auto Parking 9.72 s 6. Tips 2.00 Total 62T73 National League of Cities-Washington - 1983 ` 1. Transportation 13.50 x 2. Taxi 30.00 3. Hotel 52.50 4. Auto Parking 24.00 5. Airfare 650.00 Total 77T .Ui7 National League of Cities-Washington - 1984 C i 1. Transportation 13.50 2. Taxi 17.25 3. Mewls 20.00 t 4. Auto Parking 21.00 Total 7T. 75 American Library Association-Dallas - 1984 1. Transportation 40.00 2. Taxi 15,00 3. Hotel 162,00 4. Meals 109,76 4 5. Telephone 27.28 6. Auto Parking 18.00 t Total 3 .-o s: y t, Ray Stephens j Texas Municipal League- Austin - 1984 } 1. Transportation 17.50 2. Taxi 12.00 3. Hotel 106.30 i, 4. Meals 22.00 5. Auto Parking 14.00 6. Tip,, 1.00 7. Airfare 78.00 Total 20:80 k Texas Municipal League - Dallas 4 1. `Transportation 35.00 21 Hotel 85.02 3. Meals 21.49 k' Total 17+ R Texas Library Association Legislative Day - Austin s 1. Tani 1.08 - 2. Hotel 55.00 3. Meals 53.11 ; 4. Tips 3.16 5. Airfare 78.00 Total 141.40 ri r~ f _ ry t g I r~ it ii Richard Stewart ;j National League of Cities - Washington 1. Airfare 550.00 W' Total U.S. Conference of Mayors - Washington 1. Airfare 650.00 Total b:017 i Mayors Leadership Institute ~ i 1. Airfare 579,00 Total 579.00 f 2283M _t E 4 } f c 1 t f s ~ t f ; r