HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 14, 2012 AgendaAGENDA
CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL
August 14, 2012
After determining that a quonim is present, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas will
convene in 2"a Tuesday Session on Tuesday, August 14, 2012 at 2:30 p.m. in the City Council
Worlc Session Room at City Hall, 215 E. McKinney Street, Denton, Texas at which the
following items will be considered:
NOTE: A 2"a Tuesday Session is used to explore matters of interest to one or more City Council
Members or the City Manager for the purpose of giving staff direction into whether or not such
matters should be placed on a fut�ire regular or special meeting of the Council for citizen input,
City Council deliberation and formal City action. At a 2"a Tuesday Session, the City Council
generally receives informal and prelinunary reports and information from City staff, officials,
members of City committees, and the individual or organization proposing council action, if
invited by City Council or City Manager to participate in the session. Participation by
individuals and members of organizations invited to spealc ceases when the Mayor announces the
session is being closed to public input. Although 2"a Tuesday Sessions are public nieetings, and
citizens have a legal right to attend, they are not public hea�ings, so citizens are not allowed to
participate in the session unless invited to do so by the Mayor. Any citizen may supply to the
City Council, prior to the beginning of the session, a written report regarding the citizen's
opinion on the matter being explored. Should the Council direct the matter be placed on a
regular meeting agenda, the staff will generally prepare a final report defining the proposed
action, which will be made available to all citizens prior to the regular meeting at which citizen
input is sought. The purpose of this procedure is to allow citizens attending the regular meeting
the opportunity to hear the views of their fellow citizens without having to attend two meetings.
1. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding an ordinance to
amend the currently adopted 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC).
2. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding an ordinance to
adopt the 2009 International Building Code (IBC), the 2009 International Residential
Code (IRC), the 2009 International Plumbing Code (IPC), the 2009 International
Mechanical Code (IMC), and the 2009 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) as amended
by the City.
3. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding an ordinance to
adopt the 2011 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the City.
4. Receive report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding the proposed
adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 29 of the Code of the City of Denton, Texas,
to provide for the adoption of the International Fire Code, 2009 Edition.
5. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the prioritization of
the bicycle accommodation proj ects.
6. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction on the consultant proposal for
the design of the Hicicory Street Grand Street proj ect that meets the pavement, sidewallcs,
streetscape and landscape criteria as envisioned in the Downtown Implementation Plan
adopted by the City Council.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 14, 2012
Page 2
7. Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding the FY 2012-2013
Proposed Budget, Capital Improvement Program, and Five-Year Financial Forecast.
Following the completion of the 2"a Tuesday Session, the City Council will convene in a Special
Called Session to consider the following:
1. Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas,
calling an election to be held on November 6, 2012, within said city on the question of
the issuance of $20,400,000 in ad valorem tax supported public securities for street and
public art improvements; malcing provision for the conduct of the election; and
containing other provisions incidental thereto; and declaring an effective date.
Following the completion of the Special Called Session, the City Council will convene in a
Closed Meeting to consider specific items when these items are listed below under the Closed
Meeting section of this agenda. The City Council reserves the right to adjourn into a Closed
Meeting on any item on its Open Meeting agenda consistent with Chapter 551 of the Texas
Government Code, as amended, or as otherwise allowed by law.
CLOSED MEETING
A. Consultation with Attorneys — Under Texas Government Code Section 551.071.
1. Consult with and provide direction to the City's attorneys associated with
proposed enforcement related to sanitary sewer overflows and where a public
discussion of such legal matters would conflict with the duty of the City's
attorneys to the City of Denton, Texas and the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State
Bar of Texas.
2. Consultation with the City's attorneys regarding the advisability of revising the
existing Denton Code of Ordinances provisions dealing with the proper disposal
and control of fats, oils and grease into the wastewater stream; and discuss,
deliberate and provide the City's attorneys with direction and any
recommendations regarding such legal matter. A public discussion of this legal
matter would conflict with the duty of the City's Attorneys to the City Council
under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of
Texas.
3. Consult with and provide direction to City's attorneys regarding legal issues and
strategies associated with Phase I and proposed Phase II Gas Well Ordinance
regulation of gas well drilling and production within the City Limits and the
extraterritorial jurisdiction, including Constitutional limitations, statutory
linutations upon municipal regulatory authority, moratorium on drilling and
production and claims associated therewith, including variance requests for relief
from the moratorium, statutory preemption and/or impacts of federal and state law
and regulations as it concerns municipal regulatory authority and matters relating
to enforcement of the ordinance.
City of Denton City Council Agenda
August 14, 2012
Page 3
B. Deliberations Regarding Certain Public Power Utilities: Competitive Matters — Under
Texas Government Code Section 551.086.
1. Receive competitive public power information from staff in the form of a
proposed operating budget for Denton Municipal Electric (DME) for the
upcoming fiscal year, including without limitation, revenues, expenses,
commodity volumes, and comnutments, and the direction of DME; and discuss,
deliberate, consider adoption of the budget and other matters, and provide staff
with direction regarding such matters.
C. Consultation with Attorneys — Under Texas Government Code Section 551.071;
Deliberations regarding Real Property — Under Texas Government Code Section 551.072.
1. Discuss, deliberate and receive information from staff and provide staff with
direction pertaining to the potential purchase of a 2.0 acre tract, more or less,
located in the Hiram Sisco Survey, Abstract No. 1184, Denton, County, Texas,
and located generally at the corner of McKinney Street and Oaldand Street, City
of Denton, Texas. Consultation with the City's attorneys regarding legal issues
associated with the potential acquisition of the real property described above
where a public discussion of these legal matters would conflict with the duty of
the City's attorneys to the City of Denton and the Denton City Council under the
Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas, or
would jeopardize the City's legal position in any adnunistrative proceeding or
potential litigation.
CERTIFICATE
I certify that the above notice of ineeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the
City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 2012 at o'clocic
(a.m.) �P.m.)
CITY SECRETARY
NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION ROOM IS
ACCESSIBLE 1N ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT.
THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE 1NTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING
IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS 1N ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED
MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 349-8309 OR USE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-
RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE 1NTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED
THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY' S OFFICE.
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
AGENDA DATE: August 14, 2012
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development, Building Inspections Division
,:�;
ACM: Fred Greene, Neighborhood Services �;j
SUBJECT
Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding an ordinance to amend the
currently adopted 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC).
BACKGROUND
The 2009 International Energy Conservation Code was published by the International Code
Council in early 2009. Subsequent to its publication, the Energy Board of the North Central
Texas Council of Governments conducted a review of the Code. As a result of their review, the
Energy Board recommended several amendments which were then presented the municipalities
within the 16-county north central Texas region for consideration of adoption. The City of
Denton adopted the 2009 Energy Code, as amended, on May 4, 2010 before the C.O.G.
amendments were published.
The proposed amendments to the current Energy Code will improve the City's enforcement
ability of this code, for example: by deleting the complicated requirements for residential
alterations; requiring that builders and designers submit energy compliance reports that are
created by certified professional; and requiring commercial projects to be certified by energy
professionals before receiving final City approval. This proposed revision of the Energy Code
will also include a requirement for all one and two family dwellings to demonstrate surpassing
the current Code requirement by a minimum of ten percent (10%). This 10% over Code
requirement has been in each of the last 3 versions of the City's Energy Codes.
The City of Denton Building Inspections staff began reviewing the C.O.G. amendments in early
2011 with the goal of adopting the amended ordinance by early 2012.
On January 31, 2012, staff presented the draft amendments of the 2009 Energy to a group of
approximately 50 stalceholders including builders, contractors, plumbers, mechanical contractors,
architects, and engineers. The presentation highlighted the most significant changes from the
current version of the 2009 IECC to the proposed amended version of the 2009 IECC which
were received well by the attendants.
A copy of the proposed amended 2009 Energy Code is posted on the Building Inspections
Division's webpage.
On Febniary 16, 2012 the amended Code was presented to the Health and Building Standards
Commission (HaBSCO). The HaBSCo commissioners voted unanimously to recommend
adoption of the amended Energy Code to the City Council.
On March 6, 2012 the draft ordinance of the proposed changes to the 2009 Energy Code was
presented to the city Council at a work session. The City Council requested that a presentation
of the proposed ordinance be made to the Chamber of Commerce.
Agenda Information Sheet
August 14, 2012
Page 2
On March 28, 2012 the draft ordinance of the proposed changes to the 2009 Energy Code was
presented to the Chamber of Commerce. As a result of the meeting with the Chamber of
Commerce, the members present during the presentation had some concerns with the proposed
code adoptions and these concerns are reflected in the following five questions:
1. What other cities in North Texas have adopted the 2009 Building Code amendments?
2. What other cities in North Texas are on a newer code; 2012, 2015?
3. What other cities in North Texas adopted a 10% or more increase in the energy code?
4. What is the increased effective cost of adopting the changes to the builder?
5. What is the effective cost of implementing the independent energy inspections over
adding staff to complete the final energy inspections?
The answers to these questions have been delivered to the Chamber of Commerce and made
available to the City Manager's Office. We have not received any additional responses from the
Chamber.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staff does not anticipate any fiscal impact to the City as a result of adopting this Code.
OPTIONS
1. Postpone consideration and provide staff with further direction.
2. Adopt the 2009 IECC as recommended.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that
Conservation Code.
the City Council adopt this amended 2009 International Energy
EXHIBITS
Febniary 16, 2012 HaBSCo Commission Minutes
Chamber of Commerce Questions with Staff Responses
Proposed Amended 2009 International Energy Conservation Code Ordinance
Respectfully prepared and submitted by,
��
Kurt Hansen, Building Official
Respectfully submitted:
��
Marlc Cunningham, AICP, CPM
Minutes
Health and Building Standards Commission
February 16, 2012
Members present: Jana�T Tieken, Jim Strange, Jeff Wa���ro, Rod Reeves, Rosanne Ciccia and
GanT Robinson
Members absent: David Hoenig
Staff inembers present: Kurt Hansen, Glenda Gailliard, ZacicenT Loiselle, Dean Bra�T and Chacl
Weldon
Welcome and Call to Order
Kurt Hansen, Building Official, called the meeting to order at 4:OSp.m.
Consider approval of the minutes of May 19, 2011
Jim Strange made a motion to approve the minutes of Ma�T 19, 2011.
Seconded b�T Rosanne Ciccia. Motion carried 6-0.
Elect a chair for the Health and Building Standards Commission
Kurt requested that all members introduce themselves.
Jana�T Tielcen moved that Jim strange be the ne��� Chairman and Jeff Wa���ro be the
Vice Chairman. Seconded b�T Rosanne Ciccia.
Review the requirements for Commissioners, including: Attorney General's Open
Meetings Training, and City of Denton Handbook for Boards, Commissions, and
Council Committees
Jennifer Walters came forward and gave a brief description and overview of
each.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2009 International Fire Code as
amended by the City and make recommendation to the City Council.
Dean Bra�T (Fire Protection Engineer Associate) and Chacl Weldon (Assistant Fire
Marshall) came for��� ard. Chad gave a slide presentation and briefed the
Commissioners on the acloption of the 2009 International Fire Code.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Janay Tielcen made a motion to recommend to the City Council the
adoption of the 2009 International Fire code as amended by the City.
Seconded by Rod Reeves. Motion carrie 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2009 International Building
Code as amended by the City, 2009 International Residential Code as
amended by the City, 2009 International Plumbing Code as amended by the
City, 2009 International Mechanical Code as amended by the City, and the
2009 International Fuel Gas Code as amended by the City and make
recommendation to the City Council.
Kurt Hansen, came fon��ard and presented a slide presentation and briefed
the Commissioners on the adoption of the 2009 International Building
Code as amended b�T the Cit�T, 2009 International Residential Code as
amended b�T the Cit�T, 2009 International Plumbing Code as amended b�T the
Cit�T, 2009 International Mechanical Code as amended b�T the Cit�T, and the
2009 International Fuel Gas Code as amended b�T the Cit�T.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Rosanne Ciccia made a motion to recommend to the City Council the
adoption of the 2009 IBC, the 2009 IRC, the 2009 IPC, the 2009 IMC, and
the 2009 IFGC, as amended by the City. Seconded by Janay Tieken. Motion
carrie 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2011 National Electrical Code as
amended by the City and make recommendation to the City Council.
Kurt Hansen, came fon��ard and presented a slide presentation and briefed
the Commissioners on the acloption of the 2011 National Electrical Code
as amended b�T the Cit�T.
There ��� as a brief question and ans��� er session.
Jeff Wa���ro macle a motion to recommend to the Cit�T Council the acloption of the
2011 National Electrical Code ���ith the consideration to delete the requirement
to install Arc-Fault Circuit-Internipter protection for all 15 and 20 ampere
branch circuits in the rooms not protected with a Ground-Fault Circuit-
Internipter protection device of all dwelling units and maintain the current
code requirement. Seconded by Rod Reeves. Motion carried 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the amendments to the 2009
International Energy Conservation Code by the City and make recommendation to
the City Council.
There ��� as a brief question and ans��� er session.
Jana�T Tielcen made a motion to recommend to the Cit�T Council the acloption the
ne��� amendments to the 2009 International Energ�T Conservation Code. Seconded
b�T Rosanne Ciccia. Motion carried 6-0
Hold a discussion about the HaBSCo meeting schedule for March 15, 2012.
The neztmeeting ���ill be held March 15, 2012.
Under Section _5_51.042 of the Texas Open Meeting Act. Hold a discussion
and set the date for future CAAB meetings. Under Section _5_51.042 of the Texas
Open Meetings Act, Under Section 551.042 of the Texas Open Meetings Act,
respond to inquiries from the City Council or the public with specific factual
information or recitation of policy, or accept a proposal to place the matter on the
agenda for an upcoming meeting AND Under Section _5_51.041_5 of the Texas Open
Meetings Act, provide reports about items of community interest regarding which
no action will be taken, to include: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or
condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; an honorary or salutary
recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen; a reminder about
an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing body; information
regarding a social, ceremonial, or community event organized or sponsored by an
entity other than the governing body that was attended or is scheduled to be
attended by a member of the governing body or an official or employee of the
municipality; or an announcement involving an imminent threat to the public
health and safety of people in the municipality that has arisen after the posting of
the agenda.
Adjourn
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 5:24 p.m.
Jim Strange,
HaBSCo Chairman
Jeff W a��� ro,
Co-Chairman
Glenda Gailliard, Permit Technician
Supervisor, Cit�T of Denton
Chamber of Commerce Questions with Staff Responses
KURT NANSEN: 2009 Building Codes—July 13, 2012
1. What other cities in North Texas have adopted the 2009 Building Code amendments?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: Out of the 23 cities which responded to my survey, 15 Cities have already adopted the 2009
Building Codes.
2. What other cities in North Texas are on a newer code; 2012, 2015?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: There are currently no cities on the 2012 Building Codes, however, 11 of these cities are
scheduled to adopt the 2012 Building Codes within the first 6 months of next year. This is probably due
to the fact that the NCTCOG amendments will not be published until the end of 2012.
3. What other cities in North Texas adopted a 10% or more increase in the energy code?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: Along with the City of Denton, only 2 other cities (Frisco and Plano) have requirements more
stringent than the 2009 Energy Code.
City Adopted the 2009 Planned Adoption Surpass the IECC Require 3rd Party
Code of 2012 Requirements Energy Inspectors
for Res & Comm
Rockwall 2-6-2012 3 years No Yes, both
Allen 5-24-2011 ? No Yes, both
Garland 1-2-2012 ? No In-house
Benbrook 12-2012 1-1-2013 No Res, no — Comm,
yes
Bedford 3-22-2011 ? No Yes, both
Frisco IECC only, 5-2012 9-2012 Energy Star only — Res, yes — Comm,
for all others considering IECC no
2009 +15%
Lancaster No ? No Yes, both
Carrollton 2-11-11 1-1-2013 No In-house
Grand Prairie 2-2011 No, 2015 No Yes, both
Celina No ? No Yes, both
Irving No, May or June No, 2015 No No, just Energy
2012 Star
Waco 1-1-2010 1-1-2013 No No, but accept
their reports
McKinney No Fall, 2012 No Yes, both
Arlington 5-24-2012 ? No In-house
Plano 1-2011 1-2013 Yes, 15% above Yes, both
Wylie No 4-2013 No Yes, both
University Park 2010 ? No In-house
Prosper No 3-2013 No Yes, both
Nurst 04-2011 No, 2015 No In-house
Coppell 1-11-12 1-2013 No
Dallas No 3-2013 No Yes, both
Colleyville 10-2012 ? No Yes, both
Southlake 4-2011 7-2013 No No, but accept
their reports
4. What is the increased effective cost of adopting the changes to the builder?
Answer: For a typical new home, an added cost of approximately $425.00
Note: As indicated on the chart below, by adopting the 2009 Building Codes along with the 2011
Electrical Code, the major additional requirements for a new home include adding a carbon monoxide
detector, adding more arc fault circuit interrupters, and also adding tamperproof receptacles.
2005 NEC or 2006 I- 2011 NEC or 2009 Approximate Cost
Code Requirement Extended Cost
Codes I-Codes Increases
Carbon monoxide No requirement Required $50 each $100.00
Detector
Arc Fault Circuit In sleeping rooms In all rooms $45 each $315.00
Interrupters only (approximately without GFCI (approximately 7
3 AFCIs) protection more AFCIs)
Tamperproof No Requirement In all 15 & 20 amp $1.25 each $12.50
Receptacles (approximately 25 wall receptacles (approximately 25
receptacles @ $0.75 receptacles at and
each) increase of $.50
each)
Total Increase $427.50
5. What is the effective cost of implementing the independent inspection outlined in 506.4.2 over
adding staff to complete the inspections?
Answer: Before I address the cost of adding staff to perform final energy inspections, I will share
my findings in regards to hiring a 3rd party energy inspection company to perform energy
inspections. The effective cost of a final energy inspection will vary from project to project
depending on the size and the energy needs of each project. Nowever, from my research with
three local 3rd party energy inspection companies, costs average approximately $0.10 per square
foot for a 5,000 Sq Ft project, or about $500.00. This cost includes the preliminary ComCheck
report and a full final inspection. Also, the cost per square foot does decreases as the project
increases in size.
Now, what would be the cost of hiring additional staff to perform commercial energy
inspections? The annual cost for a Commercial Building Inspector, plus benefits, plus a vehicle is
approximately $95,000. In the past year, the city inspectors performed approximately 270
commercial and commercial alteration energy inspections. By dividing $95,000 by 270
inspections, the average cost per energy inspection would be approximately $350.00. I could
add an additional permit fee of $350.00 on each commercial project or I could look at a price per
sq ft. The price per sq ft would be somewhere around 7 cents, and so for example, at 7 cents
per sq ft, an energy inspection on a 5,000 sq ft project would cost $350.00.
In conclusion, with the addition of a Commercial Building Inspector to my staff, my City staff
would be able to do a thorough energy inspection for each commercial or commercial alteration
project.
Note: Remember, this proposal is only for Commercial and Commercial Alteration permits. Residential
projects are required to have a duct and a house tightness test performed and the builders are already
providing this information to the inspectors.
With the current staff of inspectors and the current workload, the City has not been able to verify, as
thoroughly as possible, the final state of the compliance of these projects with the requirements of the
Energy Code. Since verifying a projects compliance with the Energy Code is not typically a life/safety
issue, my current staff does their best, with the resources available; to see that energy requirements are
met.
With each new addition of the Energy Code, the requirements are growing more stringent and more
complicated. As you can see from the first chart above, thirteen (more than half) of the twenty three
cities surveyed require verification from 3rd party energy inspections for both residential and commercial
properties; only nine of the twenty three cities surveyed perform their own energy inspections or they
accept the reports from 3rd party energy inspectors. I think that in the near future, more and more
Cities will be requiring 3rd party verification, or they will be hiring highly trained and skilled energy
inspectors to perform all their energy inspections.
s:\legal\our documents\ordinances\12\energy code ordinazice 2009-2011.doc
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AMENDING CHAPTER 28 OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES BY REVISING THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE,
AS PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, BY ESTABLISHING LOCAL
AMENDMENTS THERETO; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000.00
FOR VIOLATIONS HERETO; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES
IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
SECTION 1. Chapter 28 of the Code of .Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amending
existing sections 28-253 and 28-254 to read as follows:
Section 28-254. Amendments to the 2009 International �nergy Conservation Code
(1)Section 101.4.2; change to read ns foUows:
101.4.2 Historic Buildings. Any building or structure that is listed in the State or National Register of
Historic Places; designated as a historic property under local or state designation law or survey; certifed as
a contributing resource with a National Register listed or locally designated historic district; or with an
opinion or certiiication that the property is eligible to be listed on the National or State Registers of Historic
Places either individually or as a contributing building to a historic district by the State Historic
Preservation Officer of the Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places, shall comply with all of the
provisions of this code.
�xception: Whenever a provision or provisions shall invalidate or jeopardize the historical
designation or listing, that provision or provisions may be exempted.
(2)Section 103.1; add Sectiorr 103.1.1 to ��ead ns follows:
103.1.1 Alternative compliance. A building certified by a national, state, or local accredited energy
efficiency program and determined by the Energy Systems Laboratory to be in compliance with the energy
ef�ciency requirements of this section may, at the option of the Code Official, be considered in
compliance. The United States Environmental Protection Agency's Energy Star Program certification of
energy code equivalency shall be considered in compliance.
Exception: Test every house for building envelope air tightness as required in Section 402.4.2 Air
sealing and insulation.
(3) Section 202; add the follotiving defr�rition:
GLAZING AREA. Total area of the glazed fenestration measured using the rough opening and including
sash, curbing or other framing elements that enclose conditioned space. Glazing area includes the area of
glazed fenestration assemblies in walls bounding conditioned basements. For doors where the daylight
opening area is less that 50 percent of the door area, the glazing area is the daylight opening area. Far all
other doors, the glazing area is the rough opening area for the door including the door and the frame.
(4) Section 401.2, Ite»� 1; chn�tge to read as fo/lows:
1. Sections 402.1 through 402.3, 403.2.1 and 404.1 (prescriptive) and the use of Tables 402.1.1 and
402.13 are limited to a maximum glazing area of 15% window area to floor area ratio; or
2. Section 405 (performance); and
3, Demonstrate surpassing the minimum compliance of this code by 10% or more.
(5)Section 402.2; Add Sectiorr 402.2.12 to rearl as follo�vs:
s:\legal\our documents\ordinances\12\energy code ordinance 2009-201 l.doc
Section 402.2.12 Insulation installed in walls. Insulation batts installed in walls shall be totally
surrounded by an enclosure on all sides consisting of framing lumber, gypsum, sheathing, wood structural
panel sheathing or other equivalent material approved by the building official.
(6) Sectio�t 402.3. 7; delete entire section:
Section 402.3.7 Prescriptive path for additions.
(7) Table 402.3.7; delete entire table:
Table 402.3.7 Prescriptive envelope component criteria additions to and replacement windows for
exiting detached one- and two-family dwellings.
(8) Section 402.4.2; change to read as follows:
Section 402.4.2 Air sealing and insulation. Building envelope air tightness and insulation installation
shall be demonsmated to comply with the following option given by section 402.4.2.1:
(9) Sectio�r 402.4.2.2; delete tJiis sectiort.
(10)Section 405.4.1; add tl7e followrrrg sente�rce to the end of paragraph:
RemRateTD7, Energy GaugeT"�, RESchecic with UA Trade-Off, and IC3 are dees�zed acceptable
perfort�tartce si�:arlatioit progray�is.
(11)Section 405.4.2(3); change to read as follotivs:
3. Nmne, phone nurnbe��, and certification number of i�divzdual completing the coinpliance repo��t. The
preparer of the compliance �°eport shall Izave one of the listed ce�•t�cation: ICC (InteNnational Code
Council) Commercial Energy Inspector, ICC Coname��cial Energy Plans Examrner, ICC Residential Energy
Inspector/Plaras Examiner, or HERS (Home Energy Ratin� rater; and
(12)Sectio�: 405.4.3; ndd tlre fo/lotiving to tfris sectio�z:
4. Final testing co»�pliance reports shall be conapleted on the City ofDenton Ene��gy Compliance form,
(13)Sectio�t 502.2.8; Add Section 502.2.8 to ��ead rrs follows:
Section 502.2.7 Insulation installed in walls. Insulation batts installed in walls shall be totally surrounded
by an enclosure on all sides consisting of fi�aming lumber, gypsum, sheathing, wood structural panel
sheathing or other equivalent material approved by the building official.
(14)Sectimr 506.4.2; add (6) to read as follo�vs:
6. Compliance reports, all additional doca�mentation, a»d a final cornpliance verification repo�•t shall be
prepared by a qual�ed thi�•d party ene��gy ve��ifrer. The third parry ene��gy verr`fier shall include his rraTne,
phone numbe��, and certification nurnber on each docunzent p��ovided to the ciry. The third party ene��gy
ve��ifier shall be certified with one of the followirrg certificatiorrs: ICC (Inter•national Code Council)
Com�nercial Energy Inspector, ICC Cornmercial Enef�gy Plarrs Examiner, ICC Residential Ene��gy
Irrspector/Plans E.�arniner, or HERS (Home Energy Ratin� rate��.
Secs. 28-255 --- 28-295. Reserved.
SECTION 2. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or
circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provision or application, and to this end
the provisions of this ordinance are severable.
2
s:\legal\our documents\ordinances\l2\energy code ordinance 2009-2011.doc
SECTION 3. All provisions of the ordinances of the City of Denton in conflict with the provision
of this ordinance are hereby repealed, and all other provisions of the ordinances of the City or Denton, not
in conflict with the provision of this ordinance, shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be
fined a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00). Each day that a provision of this Ordinance is
violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offence.
SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective October 1, 2012 and the City Secretary is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record
Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this, the day of , 2012
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
I:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
ANITA BURGESS, CITY ATTORI�EY
� ,�
� � .�..' �� ,�''�
sY: �'r �{ z�f,t� ���_--�'�
3
MARIC A. BURROUGHS, MAYOR
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
AGENDA DATE: August 14, 2012
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development, Building Inspections Division
ACM: Fred Greene, Neighborhood Services ��;JH
SUBJECT
Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding an ordinance to adopt the
2009 International Building Code (IBC), the 2009 International Residential Code (IRC), the
2009 International Plumbing Code (IPC), the 2009 International Mechanical Code (IMC), and
the 2009 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) as amended by the City.
BACKGROUND
The current 2006 Building Codes, as amended, were adopted on Febniary 3, 2009.
The 2009 International Building Codes were published by the International Code Council (ICC)
early in 2009. After its publication, the various building code boards of the North Central Texas
Council of Governments (COG) began their review of the Codes. Subsequent to their review,
the Boards recommended several amendments to the Codes. The recommended COG
amendments were then published to the municipalities within this 16-county North Central Texas
region for consideration of adoption.
The City of Denton Building Inspections staff began reviewing the COG amendments early in
2011 with the goal of adoption in early 2012. On January 31, 2012, the amended 2009
International Building Codes were presented to approximately 50 area professionals including
builders, contractors, plumbers, mechanical contractors, architects, and engineers. The
presentation highlighted the most significant changes from the 2006 Codes to the 2009 version of
the Building Codes, which were received well by the attendants. Copies of the proposed 2009
Building Code are posted on the Building Inspections webpage.
On Febniary 16, 2012 the draft ordinance of the 2009 Building Codes was presented to the
Health and Building Standards Commission (HaBSCo). The HaBSCo commissioner voted
unanimously to recommend adoption.
On March 6, 2012 the draft ordinance of the 2009 Building Codes was presented to the City
Council at a worlc session. The City Council requested that a presentation of the proposed
ordinance be made to the Chamber of Commerce.
On March 28, 2012 the draft ordinance of the 2009 Building Codes was presented to the
Chamber of Commerce. As a result of the meeting with the Chamber of Commerce, the
members present during the presentation had some concerns with the proposed code adoptions
and these concerns are reflected in the following five questions:
Agenda Information Sheet
August 14, 2012
Page 2
1. What other cities in North Texas have adopted the 2009 Building Code amendments?
2. What other cities in North Texas are on a newer code; 2012, 2015?
3. What other cities in North Texas adopted a 10% or more increase in the energy code?
4. What is the increased effective cost of adopting the changes to the builder?
5. What is the effective cost of implementing the independent energy inspections over
adding staff to complete the final energy inspections?
The answers to these questions have been delivered to the Chamber of Commerce and made
available to the City Manager's Office. We have not received any additional responses from the
Chamber.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staff does not anticipate any fiscal impact to the City as a result of adopting this Code.
OPTIONS
1. Postpone consideration and provide staff with further direction.
2. Adopt the 2009 International Building Codes as recommended.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the 2009 International Building Code, Residential
Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, and the Fuel Gas Code along with staff recommended
amendments.
EXHIBITS
Febniary 16, 2012 HaBSCo Commission Minutes
Chamber of Commerce Questions with Staff Reponses
Proposed 2009 Building Code Ordinance
Respectfully prepared and submitted by,
��
Kurt Hansen.
Building Official
Respectfully submitted:
�
Marlc Cunningham, AICP, CPM
Minutes
Health and Building Standards Commission
February 16, 2012
Members present: Jana�T Tieken, Jim Strange, Jeff Wa���ro, Rod Reeves, Rosanne Ciccia and
GanT Robinson
Members absent: David Hoenig
Staff inembers present: Kurt Hansen, Glenda Gailliard, ZacicenT Loiselle, Dean Bra�T and Chacl
Weldon
Welcome and Call to Order
Kurt Hansen, Building Official, called the meeting to order at 4:OSp.m.
Consider approval of the minutes of May 19, 2011
Jim Strange made a motion to approve the minutes of Ma�T 19, 2011.
Seconded b�T Rosanne Ciccia. Motion carried 6-0.
Elect a chair for the Health and Building Standards Commission
Kurt requested that all members introduce themselves.
Jana�T Tielcen moved that Jim strange be the ne��� Chairman and Jeff Wa���ro be the
Vice Chairman. Seconded b�T Rosanne Ciccia.
Review the requirements for Commissioners, including: Attorney General's Open
Meetings Training, and City of Denton Handbook for Boards, Commissions, and
Council Committees
Jennifer Walters came forward and gave a brief description and overview of
each.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2009 International Fire Code as
amended by the City and make recommendation to the City Council.
Dean Bra�T (Fire Protection Engineer Associate) and Chacl Weldon (Assistant Fire
Marshall) came for��� ard. Chad gave a slide presentation and briefed the
Commissioners on the acloption of the 2009 International Fire Code.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Janay Tielcen made a motion to recommend to the City Council the
adoption of the 2009 International Fire code as amended by the City.
Seconded by Rod Reeves. Motion carrie 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2009 International Building
Code as amended by the City, 2009 International Residential Code as
amended by the City, 2009 International Plumbing Code as amended by the
City, 2009 International Mechanical Code as amended by the City, and the
2009 International Fuel Gas Code as amended by the City and make
recommendation to the City Council.
Kurt Hansen, came fon��ard and presented a slide presentation and briefed
the Commissioners on the adoption of the 2009 International Building
Code as amended b�T the Cit�T, 2009 International Residential Code as
amended b�T the Cit�T, 2009 International Plumbing Code as amended b�T the
Cit�T, 2009 International Mechanical Code as amended b�T the Cit�T, and the
2009 International Fuel Gas Code as amended b�T the Cit�T.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Rosanne Ciccia made a motion to recommend to the City Council the
adoption of the 2009 IBC, the 2009 IRC, the 2009 IPC, the 2009 IMC, and
the 2009 IFGC, as amended by the City. Seconded by Janay Tieken. Motion
carrie 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2011 National Electrical Code as
amended by the City and make recommendation to the City Council.
Kurt Hansen, came fon��ard and presented a slide presentation and briefed
the Commissioners on the acloption of the 2011 National Electrical Code
as amended b�T the Cit�T.
There ��� as a brief question and ans��� er session.
Jeff Wa���ro macle a motion to recommend to the Cit�T Council the acloption of the
2011 National Electrical Code ���ith the consideration to delete the requirement
to install Arc-Fault Circuit-Internipter protection for all 15 and 20 ampere
branch circuits in the rooms not protected with a Ground-Fault Circuit-
Internipter protection device of all dwelling units and maintain the current
code requirement. Seconded by Rod Reeves. Motion carried 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the amendments to the 2009
International Energy Conservation Code by the City and make recommendation to
the City Council.
There ��� as a brief question and ans��� er session.
Jana�T Tielcen made a motion to recommend to the Cit�T Council the acloption the
ne��� amendments to the 2009 International Energ�T Conservation Code. Seconded
b�T Rosanne Ciccia. Motion carried 6-0
Hold a discussion about the HaBSCo meeting schedule for March 15, 2012.
The neztmeeting ���ill be held March 15, 2012.
Under Section _5_51.042 of the Texas Open Meeting Act. Hold a discussion
and set the date for future CAAB meetings. Under Section _5_51.042 of the Texas
Open Meetings Act, Under Section 551.042 of the Texas Open Meetings Act,
respond to inquiries from the City Council or the public with specific factual
information or recitation of policy, or accept a proposal to place the matter on the
agenda for an upcoming meeting AND Under Section _5_51.041_5 of the Texas Open
Meetings Act, provide reports about items of community interest regarding which
no action will be taken, to include: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or
condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; an honorary or salutary
recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen; a reminder about
an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing body; information
regarding a social, ceremonial, or community event organized or sponsored by an
entity other than the governing body that was attended or is scheduled to be
attended by a member of the governing body or an official or employee of the
municipality; or an announcement involving an imminent threat to the public
health and safety of people in the municipality that has arisen after the posting of
the agenda.
Adjourn
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 5:24 p.m.
Jim Strange,
HaBSCo Chairman
Jeff W a��� ro,
Co-Chairman
Glenda Gailliard, Permit Technician
Supervisor, Cit�T of Denton
Chamber of Commerce Questions with Staff Responses
KURT NANSEN: 2009 Building Codes—July 13, 2012
1. What other cities in North Texas have adopted the 2009 Building Code amendments?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: Out of the 23 cities which responded to my survey, 15 Cities have already adopted the 2009
Building Codes.
2. What other cities in North Texas are on a newer code; 2012, 2015?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: There are currently no cities on the 2012 Building Codes, however, 11 of these cities are
scheduled to adopt the 2012 Building Codes within the first 6 months of next year. This is probably due
to the fact that the NCTCOG amendments will not be published until the end of 2012.
3. What other cities in North Texas adopted a 10% or more increase in the energy code?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: Along with the City of Denton, only 2 other cities (Frisco and Plano) have requirements more
stringent than the 2009 Energy Code.
City Adopted the 2009 Planned Adoption Surpass the IECC Require 3rd Party
Code of 2012 Requirements Energy Inspectors
for Res & Comm
Rockwall 2-6-2012 3 years No Yes, both
Allen 5-24-2011 ? No Yes, both
Garland 1-2-2012 ? No In-house
Benbrook 12-2012 1-1-2013 No Res, no — Comm,
yes
Bedford 3-22-2011 ? No Yes, both
Frisco IECC only, 5-2012 9-2012 Energy Star only — Res, yes — Comm,
for all others considering IECC no
2009 +15%
Lancaster No ? No Yes, both
Carrollton 2-11-11 1-1-2013 No In-house
Grand Prairie 2-2011 No, 2015 No Yes, both
Celina No ? No Yes, both
Irving No, May or June No, 2015 No No, just Energy
2012 Star
Waco 1-1-2010 1-1-2013 No No, but accept
their reports
McKinney No Fall, 2012 No Yes, both
Arlington 5-24-2012 ? No In-house
Plano 1-2011 1-2013 Yes, 15% above Yes, both
Wylie No 4-2013 No Yes, both
University Park 2010 ? No In-house
Prosper No 3-2013 No Yes, both
Nurst 04-2011 No, 2015 No In-house
Coppell 1-11-12 1-2013 No
Dallas No 3-2013 No Yes, both
Colleyville 10-2012 ? No Yes, both
Southlake 4-2011 7-2013 No No, but accept
their reports
4. What is the increased effective cost of adopting the changes to the builder?
Answer: For a typical new home, an added cost of approximately $425.00
Note: As indicated on the chart below, by adopting the 2009 Building Codes along with the 2011
Electrical Code, the major additional requirements for a new home include adding a carbon monoxide
detector, adding more arc fault circuit interrupters, and also adding tamperproof receptacles.
2005 NEC or 2006 I- 2011 NEC or 2009 Approximate Cost
Code Requirement Extended Cost
Codes I-Codes Increases
Carbon monoxide No requirement Required $50 each $100.00
Detector
Arc Fault Circuit In sleeping rooms In all rooms $45 each $315.00
Interrupters only (approximately without GFCI (approximately 7
3 AFCIs) protection more AFCIs)
Tamperproof No Requirement In all 15 & 20 amp $1.25 each $12.50
Receptacles (approximately 25 wall receptacles (approximately 25
receptacles @ $0.75 receptacles at and
each) increase of $.50
each)
Total Increase $427.50
5. What is the effective cost of implementing the independent inspection outlined in 506.4.2 over
adding staff to complete the inspections?
Answer: Before I address the cost of adding staff to perform final energy inspections, I will share
my findings in regards to hiring a 3rd party energy inspection company to perform energy
inspections. The effective cost of a final energy inspection will vary from project to project
depending on the size and the energy needs of each project. Nowever, from my research with
three local 3rd party energy inspection companies, costs average approximately $0.10 per square
foot for a 5,000 Sq Ft project, or about $500.00. This cost includes the preliminary ComCheck
report and a full final inspection. Also, the cost per square foot does decreases as the project
increases in size.
Now, what would be the cost of hiring additional staff to perform commercial energy
inspections? The annual cost for a Commercial Building Inspector, plus benefits, plus a vehicle is
approximately $95,000. In the past year, the city inspectors performed approximately 270
commercial and commercial alteration energy inspections. By dividing $95,000 by 270
inspections, the average cost per energy inspection would be approximately $350.00. I could
add an additional permit fee of $350.00 on each commercial project or I could look at a price per
sq ft. The price per sq ft would be somewhere around 7 cents, and so for example, at 7 cents
per sq ft, an energy inspection on a 5,000 sq ft project would cost $350.00.
In conclusion, with the addition of a Commercial Building Inspector to my staff, my City staff
would be able to do a thorough energy inspection for each commercial or commercial alteration
project.
Note: Remember, this proposal is only for Commercial and Commercial Alteration permits. Residential
projects are required to have a duct and a house tightness test performed and the builders are already
providing this information to the inspectors.
With the current staff of inspectors and the current workload, the City has not been able to verify, as
thoroughly as possible, the final state of the compliance of these projects with the requirements of the
Energy Code. Since verifying a projects compliance with the Energy Code is not typically a life/safety
issue, my current staff does their best, with the resources available; to see that energy requirements are
met.
With each new addition of the Energy Code, the requirements are growing more stringent and more
complicated. As you can see from the first chart above, thirteen (more than half) of the twenty three
cities surveyed require verification from 3rd party energy inspections for both residential and commercial
properties; only nine of the twenty three cities surveyed perform their own energy inspections or they
accept the reports from 3rd party energy inspectors. I think that in the near future, more and more
Cities will be requiring 3rd party verification, or they will be hiring highly trained and skilled energy
inspectors to perform all their energy inspections.
s:Uegal\our documents\ordinances\12\building code ordinance 2009(2).doc
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AMENDING SECTIONS 28-27, 28-28, 28-33,
28-34, 28-123, 28-124, 28-144, 28-145, 28-251, AND 28-252 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS. TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE 2009
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, 2009 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR ONE
AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS, 2009 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE, 2009
INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE, AND THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE
ALL PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, REGULATING AND GOVERNING
THE CONDITIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL PROPERTY, BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES;
BY PROVIDING THE STANDARDS FOR SUPPLIED UTILITIES AND FACILITIES AND OTHER
PHYSICAL THINGS AND CONDITIONS ESSENTIAL TO ENSURE THAT STRUCTURES ARE
SAFE, SANITARY AND FIT FOR OCCUPANCY AND USE; PROVIDING FOR THE
CONDEMNATION OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES UNFIT FOR HUMAN OCCUPANCY AND
USE AND THE DEMOLITION OF SUCH STRUCTURES, PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION
AND GOVERNING OF THE CONSTRUCTION, ALTERING, MOVEMENT, ENLARGEMENT,
REPLACEMENT, REPAIR, EQUIPMENT LOCATION, REMOVAL AND DEMOLITION OF
DETACHED ONE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MULTIPLE SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLINGS (TOWNHOUSES) NOT MORE THAN THREE STORIES IN HEIGHT WITH
SEPARATE MEANS OF EGRESS; PROVIDING THE REGULATION AND GOVERNING OF THE
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION, QUALITY OF MATERIALS, ERECTION, INSTALLATION,
ALTERATION, REPAIRS, LOCATION, RELOCATION, REPLACEMENT, ADDITION TO, USE OR
MAINTENANCE OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS IN THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION AND GOVERNING OF FUEL GAS SYSTEMS AND
GAS FIRED APPLIANCES; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION
OF FEES THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS THERETO; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY
FOR VIOLATION OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $2,000.00; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
SECTION 1. That Chapter 28, Section 28-27 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton is
hereby amended so that said section shall hereafter be and read as follows: Adoption of the building code.
The International Building Code, 2009 Edition, as published by the International Code Council, a copy of
which shall be filed in the Office of the City Secretary and available for public inspection, is hereby
adopted and designated as the building code for other than 1& 2 family dwellings for the city, the same as
though the edition of such code were copied at length herein subject to the deletions and amendments
enumerated in section 28-28; That Chapter 28, Section 28-33 of the Code or Ordinances of the City of
Denton is hereby amended so that said section shall hereafter be and read as follows: Adoption of the
residential code. The International Residential Code with Appendix G, 2009 edition as published by the
International Code Council, a copy which shall be filed in the Office of the City Secretary and available for
public inspection, is hereby adopted and designated as the residential code for the city, the same as though
the edition of such code were copied at length herein subject to the deletions and amendments enumerated
in section 28-34. That Chapter 28, Section 28-123 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton is
hereby amended so that said section shall hereafter be and read as follows: Adoption of the fuel gas code.
The International Fuel Gas Code, 2009 edition as published by the International Code Council, a copy
which shall be filed in the Office of the City Secretary and available for public inspection, is hereby
adopted and designated as the fuel gas code for the city, the same as though the edition of such code were
copied at length herein subject to the deletions and amendments enumerated in section 28-124. That
Chapter 28, Section 28-144 of the Code or Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended so that said
section shall hereafter be and read as follows: Adoption of the plumbing code. The International Plumbing
Code, 2009 edition as published by the International Code Council, a copy which shall be filed in the
Office of the City Secretary and available for public inspection, is hereby adopted and designated as the
plumbing code for the city, the same as though the edition of such code were copied at length herein
subject to the deletions and amendments enumerated in section 28-145. That Chapter 28, Section 28-251 of
the Code or Ordinances of the City of Denton is hereby amended so that said section shall hereafter be and
read as follows: Adoption of the mechanical code. The International Mechanical Code, 2009 edition as
published by the International Code Council, a copy which shall be �led in the Office of the City Secretaiy
and available for public inspection, is hereby adopted and designated as the mechanical code for the city,
the same as though the edition of such code were copied at length herein subject to the deletions and
amendments enumerated in section 28-252.
SECTION 2..Section 28-28 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended to
read as follows:
28-28 Deletions and Amendments:
Amendments to the 2009 International Building Code
(1)Section 101.4; chairge to read ns follotivs:
101.4 Referenced codes. The other codes listed in Sections 101.4.1 through 101.4.6 and referenced
elsewhere in this code, when speci�cally adopted, shall be considered part of the requirements of this code
to the prescribed extent of each such reference. Whenever amendments have been adopted to the
referenced codes and standards, each reference to said code and standard shall be considered to reference
the amendments as well. Any reference to NFPA 70 or the Electrical Code shall mean the Electrical Code
as adopted.
(2)Sectiorr 101.4.7; add 8�e followii�g:
101.4.7 Electrical. The provisions of the Electrical Code shall apply to the installation of electrical
systems, including alterations, repairs, replacement, equipment, appliances, fixtures, �ttings and
appurtenances thereto.
(3) Sectiorr 103.1; delete t/ris section.
(4)Sectio�r 109; add Section 109. 7 to read as follo�vs:
109.7 Re-inspection Fee. A fee as established by city council resolution may be charged when:
1. The inspection called for is not ready when the inspector at•rives;
2. No building address or permit card is clearly posted;
3. City approved plans are not on the job site available to the inspector;
4. The building is locked or work otherwise not available for inspection when called;
5. The job site is red-tagged twice for the same item;
6. The original red tag has been removed from the job site.
7. Failure to maintain erosion control, trash control or tree protection.
Any re-inspection fees assessed shall be paid before the iinal inspection is made on that job site.
(S)Sectio�i 109; ad�l Sectio�r 109.8, 109.8.1, 109.8.2 rrrrd 109.9 to read as follows:
109.8 Work without a permit.
109.81 Investigation. Whenever work for which a permit is required by this code has been
commenced without first obtaining a permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may
be issued for such work.
2
109.8.2 Fee. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a
permit is subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee
required by this code or the city fee schedule as applicable. The payment of such investigation fee shall
not exempt the applicant fi�om compliance with all other provisions of either this code or the technical
codes nor from penalty prescribed by law.
109.9 Unauthorized cover up fee. Any work concealed without first obtaining the required inspection
in violation of section 110 shall be assessed a fee as established by the city fee schedule, This fee shall
be in addition to any citations issued as a result of work being concealed without proper inspections.
(6)Section 202; amerrd deffrritions ofAmbulatory Health Care Facility mrd Fire Watclr as follows:
[B] AMBULATORY HEALTH CARE FACILITY. Buildings or portions thereof used to provide
medical, surgical, psychiatric, nursing or similar care on a less than 24-hour basis to individuals who are
rendered incapable of self-preservation. This group may include but not be limited to the following:
- Dialysis centers
- Sedation dentistry
- Surgery centeis
- Colonic centers
- Psychiatric centers
[F]FIRE WATCH. A tempora�y measure intended to ensure continuous and systematic surveillance of a
building or portion thereof by one or more qualified individuals or standby personnel when required by the
fir�e code offrcial, far the putposes of identifying and controlling iire hazards, detecting early signs of
unwanted fire, raising an alarm of fire and notifying the fire department.
(7)Section 202� QI'i1B11lI lICflllil011 i0 Pead as follo►vs:
HIGH-RISE BUILDING. A buildirig with aft occupred floor located nzore than SS feet (16 764 rnm)
above 1he lowest level of fire depm7merrt vehicle access.
(8)Section 304.1; add the following to tlie list of occarpmrcies:
Fu•e stations
Police stations with detention facilities for 5 or fewer detainees
(9)Section 307.1; add the follotvntg to Exceptio�r 4:
4. Cleaning establishments... {text unchanged} ...with Section 712, or both. See also IFC chapter 12, Dry
Cleaning Plant provisions.
(10)Sectio�t 3101; nrnertcl second paragraph arnde�� R-3 as follows:
Adult care and child care facilities with 5 or fewer um�elated persons that are within a single-family home
are permitted to comply with the Inte��national Reszdential Code.
(11)Section 9061.2; add itern 3 to read as fo/lotivs:
3. A separation is not required between a Group R-2 and U cai�port provided that the caiport is
entu•ely open on all sides and that the distance between the two is at least 10 feet (3048 mm).
(12)Section 906.6.1; add a secorrd parag��aph to rearl as follows:
This occupancy shall also exclude garages operated for minar t•epair, modification and servicing of motor
vehicles for items such as lube changes, inspections, windshield repair or replacement, shocks, minor part
replacement and other such minor repaiis.
(13)Sectiorr 903.1.1; clra�lge to read as follo�vs:
[F] 903.1.1 Alternative protection. Alternative automatic fn•e-extinguishing systems complying with
Section 904 shall be permitted in addition to automatic sprinl<ler protection where recognized by the
applicable standard, or as approved by the fire code official.
(14)Clirrpter 9; Fire Protection Systef�ts refer to tlie 2009I�rterrratiorral Fire Code �rs amerrded by the City
of De�ttott, e.tcept for sectiorts 909 Sf�zolre Cotrtrol Systems and section 910 Sntolte an�i Heat Vents.
(I S)Section 910.1; chmtge Exception 2 to read as fol/ows:
2. Where areas of buildings are equipped with early suppression fast-response (ESFR) sprinklers,
only manual smoke and heat vents shall be required within these areas. Automatic smoke and heat
vents are prohibited.
(16)Sectio» 910.2; add Sectioir 910.2.3 witJi exceptions �rnd 910.2.4 to read ns folloivs:
910.2.3 Group H. Buildings and portions thereof used as a Group H occupancy as follows:
1. In occupancies classified as Group H-2 or H-3, any of which are more than 15,000 square feet (1394 m2)
in single floor area.
Exceptions:
1. Buildings of noncombustible construction containing only noncombustible materials.
2. Areas of buildings in Group H used for storing Class 2, 3 and 4 liquid and solid oxidizers, Class 1
and unclassifed detonable organic peroxides, Class 3 and 4 unstable (reactive) materials, or Class
2 or 3 water-reactive materials as required for a high-hazard commodity classification.
910.2.4 Exit access travel distance increase. Buildings and portions thereof used as a Group F-1 or S-1
occupancy where the maximum exit access travel distance is increased in accordance with Section 1016.3.
(17)Table 910.3; change the title of the first row of the table fi�o�i "Groarp F-1 arrd S-1 " to inclarde
"Group H" and to read as follo�vs:
G��oup H, F-1 and S-1
(18)Sectiorr 910.3.2.2; add second parag���ipl: to read as follo�vs:
The automatic operating mechanism of the smolce and heat vents shall operate at a temperature rating at
least 100 degrees F(approximately 38 degrees Celsius) greater than the temperature rating of the sprinklers
installed.
(19)Section 1007.1; add tlie followi�rg Exceptiorl4:
Exceptions:
0
{pr•evioars exceptions amchanged}
4. Buildings regulated under State Law and built in accordance with State registered plans, including
any variances or waivers granted by the State, shall be deemed to be in compliance with the
requirements of Section 1007.
(19) Section 1008.1; add followirtg paragraplt to read as fol/ows:
Sectioit 1008.1 Doors
{previous text unchanged}
Exterior door openings more than 30 inches from the top of the threshold to the surface or ground on the
exterior side of the door, that are not part of a means of egress, shall be protected by an engineered guard
designed for a live load equal to the occupancy served.
The means of attachment of the guard to the structure shall be designed and stamped by a registered
professional engineer. The design of the guard shall' meet or exceed the minimum requirements of sections
1013.2 and 2308.12.7 of this code; otherwise the exterior operating door shall be fxed in a closed position
with all operating hardware removed.
(20)Section 1008.1.4.4; add char:ges ro re�rd ns folloivs:
1008.1.4.4 Access-controlled egress doors. The entrance doors in a means of egress in buildings... {text
z�nchanged}...R-1 and R-2 shall allow for free egress at all times without the use of lceys, special
knowledge, or effort. {delete rest ofsection}
(21)Sectiorr 1008.1.9.3; Loclrs mrd Latches; add corrdition as fo/loivs:
1008.1.9.3, Locl�s and latches. Locks and latches shall... {text unchanged}... any of the following exists:
{text of conditions 1 throargh 3 trnchanged}
3.1 Where egress doors are used in pairs and positive latching is required, approved automatic
flush bolts may be permitted, provided that both leaves achieve positive latching regardless of
the closing sequence and the door leaf having the automatic flush bolts has no doorlcnobs or
surface mounted hardware.
{text of conditions 4 a»d 5 amchanged)
(22)Section 1015; add irew sectiorr 1015.7 to read as follo►vs:
1015.7 Electrical Rooms. For electrical rooms, special exitin�quirements ma��plv per the electrical
code as adopted.
(23)Section 1016; add �re►v sectiort 1016.3 to re�rd �rs follows: �
1016.3. Roof Vent Increase. In buildings that are one story in height, equipped with automatic heat and
smoke roof vents complying with Section 910 and equipped throughout with an automatic sprinlcler system
in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, the maximum exit access travel distance shall be 400 feet for
occupancies in Group F-1 or S-1.
(24)Sectiort 1018.1; add exception S to read as follows:
(previous text unchanged}
In Group B office buildings, coimidor walls and ceilings need not be of fire-resistive construction
within office spaces of a single tenant when the space is equipped with an approved automatic
fire alarm system within the con•idor, The actuation of any detector shall activate alarms audible
in all areas served by the con�idor.
(25)Section 1022.9; a�nerrd section to read as follows:
1022.9. Smokeproof enclosur•es and pressu��ized stairways. In buildings requi�•ed to cotnply with Section
403 or 405, each of t1�e exit enclosirr�es serving a story �vith a floor� service not rno��e than 55 feet (16 764
mm) above the lowest level of fire depa�°trnent vehicle access or more than 30 feet (9 144 nzrn) below.,.
{remainirrg text unchanged}
(26)Section 1024.1; cl�arrge to ��ead as follo�vs:
1024.1; General, App��oved luminous egress path markings delineating the exit path shall be provided in
buildings of Groups A, B, E, I, M and R-1 having occa�pied floors located naore tharr 55 feet (16 764 n�m)
above the lowest level offi��e depart�nent vehicle access in acco�°dance with... {Remaining text unchanged}.
(27)Sectio�z 1101.2; add an exceptiorr to read as follows:
�xception: Buildings regulated under State Law and built in accordance with State registered plans,
including any variances or waivers granted by the State, shall be deemed to be in compliance with the
requirements of this Chapter.
(28)Section 1505.7; delete the section.
(29)Section 1 SI0.1; add a se�tterrce to read as follo�vs:
1510.1 General. Materials and methods of applications used for recovering or replacing an existing roof
covering shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 15. All individual replacement shine;les or shakes
shall be in compliance with the rating required bv Table 1505.1.
{text of exception uncha»ged}
(30)Sectio�t 2308.9; adtl Sectio�t 2308.4.3 to read as follo�vs:
2308.4.3 Application to engineered design. The Building Official may apply any portion of this section
to buildings that are otherwise outside the limitations of this section provided that:
1. The resulting design will comply with the requirements specified in Chapter 16;
2. The load limitations of various elements ofthis section are not exceeded; and
3. The portions of this section which will apply are identiiied by an engineer in the consn•uction
documents.
(31)Sectio�r 29021; clrarlge to read ns follo►vs and add sirb sectiorrs:
[P]29021 Minimum number of fixtures. Plumbing fixtures shall be provided far the type of occupancy
and in the minimum number as follows:
1. Assembly Occupancies: At least one drinlcing fountain shall be provided at each floor level in an
approved location.
Exception: A drinking fountain need not be provided in a drinking or dining establishment.
0
The minimum number of fixtures provided shall also comply with the number shown in Table 2902.1.
Requirements for occupancies not shown in Table 2902.1 may be determined individually by the ba{ilding
official. The number of occupants shall be determined by this code. Occupancy classification shall be
determined in accordance with Chapter 3.
(32)Sectiort 30061; add Section 3006.1 to read as follows and rerra���zber remairri»g sections:
3006.1, General. Elevator machine rooms shall be provided."
(Renatmber rernaining sections.}
(33)Section 3006.4; arld a sentertce fo read as follows arid delete exceptions 1 mtd 2:
[F] 3006.4. Machine Rooms: (text zmchanged}... Storage shall not be allowed within the elevator machine
room. Provide approved signage at each entry door to the elevator machine room stating "Elevator�
Machine�y —No Storage Allotived."
(34)Sectiori 3109.1; charrge to read ns follows:
3109.1 General. Swimming pools shall comply with the requirements of this section and other applicable
sections of this code as well as also complying with applicable state laws.
END
SECTION 3. Section 28-34 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended to
read as follows:
28-34. Deletions and Amendments:
Amendments to the 2009 International Residential Code
(1)Section R1011; Irtsert jurisdretio�t �tnnte as follo�vs:
R101.1 Title. These regulations shall be lmown as the Residential Code for� One- and Two family
Dwellings of the City of Denton hereinafter referred to as "this code."
(2)Section R102.4; cha�ige to read as follows:
R102.4 Referenced codes and standards. The codes, when specifically adopted, and standards referenced
in this code shall be considered part of the requirements of this code to the prescribed extent of each such
reference. Whenever amendments have been adopted to the referenced codes and standards, each reference
to said code and standard shall be considered to reference the amendments as well. Any reference made to
NFPA 70 or the Elect��ical Code shall mean the Electrical Code as adopted.
Where differences occur between provisions of this code and referenced codes and standards, the
provisions of this code shall apply,
�xception: Where enforcement ... {r•ernainder of text unchanged}...
(3)Sectiort R105.2; n:trke clrrrnges to tlris sectiorr as follo�vs:
R105.2 Worlc �tienzpt fi•orn pe�mits.
No changes in frrst parag��aph.
Building:
7
1. ...provided the floor m•ea does not exceed 120 sguare feet... ,
2, Delete this exe�nption
3. No changes
4. No changes
5. No changes
6. No changes
7, No changes
8. No changes
9, No changes
10. Decks not exceeding 120 sqzrare feet in a�•ea...
(9)Sectio�z 108.7; add Sectiort 108.7 to ��ead as follo►us:
108.7 Re-inspection Fee. A fee as established by citv council resolution mav be char�ed when:
1. The inspection called for is not ready when the inspector arrives;
2. No buildin� address or permit card is clearlv posted;
3, Ap�roved plans are not on the job site available to the inspector;
4. The buildin� is lociced or worlc otherwise not available for inspection when called;
5. The,�ob site is red-tagged twice for the same item;
6. The ori�inal red tag has been removed from the job site and/or,
7. Violations exist on the propertv includin� failure to maintain erosion control, trash control or tree
protection,
8. An r�pection fees assessed shall be paid before anv more inspections are made on that job
site.
(S)Sectio�t R109.1.3; change to i�ead as follotivs:
R109.1.3 Floodplain inspections. For construction permitted in areas prone to flooding as established by
Table R301.2(1), upon ...(tert a�nchanged} .., construction, the building ofiicial may require submission .
. . {text unchanged}.
(6)Section RIIO (R1101 t/iroargJr RII0.5); delete the sectio��.
(7)Sectio�a R112.21 & R112.2.2; delete the sections.
(8)Table R301.2(1); frll i�r as folloivs:
GROUND SNOW WIND DESIGN SEISMIC DESIGN
LOAD SPEEDd (mph) Topographic Effectsk CATEGORYf
5 lb/ft2 90 (3-sec-gust)/76 No A
fastest mile
SUBJECT TO DAMAGE FROM
Weathering" I Frost line depthb I Termite°
:
moderate 6" veiy heavy
WINTER DESIGN ICE BARRIER UNDER- FLOOD AIR FREEZING MEAN
TEMPe LAYMEN h �ZARDSs INDEX' ANNUAL TEMP'
REQUIRED
22°F No local code 69°F 64.9°F
{No change to footnotes}
(9)Sectiorr R302.1; add exception #6 to rend as follows:
Exceptions: {p��evious exceptions unchanged}
6. Open metal carport sh•uctures may be constructed when also approved within adopted
ordinances.
(10)Section R302.2, Exceptio�l; cltarrge to read ns folloivs:
Exception: A common two-hour fire-resistance-rated wall assembly, or one-hour fire-resistance-rated
wall assembly when equipped with a spririlcler system.,. {remainde�� uncha�ged}
(11)Section R302.2.9, Ezceptiorr S; cl�ange to read �rs follo►vs:
Exception: {prevrous exceptions uncha»ged}
5. Townhouses separated by a common two-hour fire-resistance-rated wall, or one-hom� fire
resistant rated wall when equipped with an automatic sprinlcler system, {remainder
u»changed}
(12)Section R302.3; adrl Exception #3 to rearl ns follows:
Exceptions:
1. {existing text unchanged}
2. {existing tezt unchanged}
3. Two-family dwelling units that are also divided by a property line through the structure shall
be separated as required for townhouses.
(13)Sectio�r R302.5.1; adcl seizte�rce to sectiorr as follows:
R302.5.1 Opening protection. {existing section amchanged}... Pull down ladders installed in the ceiling of
an attached garage, where the garage attic is open to the attic of the house, shall have a minimum 20 minute
fire rating or have an approved covering of iire retardant materials.
(14)Section R302.5.2; cha�rge to read ns follows:
R302.5.2 Duct penetration. Ducts in the garage... {text uncl�anged} ...and shall have no openings into the
garage and shall be protected as required by Section 302.11, Item 4.
(1 S)Sectio�t R302.5.3; amerrd the section as follows:
R302.5.3 Other penetrations. Penetrations through the separation required in Section R302.6 shall be
0
protected as required by Section R302.11, Item 4,
(16)Section R302.7; cliange to read ns fol/o►vs:
R302.7 Under stair protection. Enclosed accessible space under stairs shall have walls, under stair
surface and any sofiits protected on the enclosed side with 5/8-inch (15.8 mm) iire-rated gypsum board or
one-hour iu•e-resistive construction.
(17)Section R303.3, Exceptioit; c/rm�ge to rearl rrs follotivs:
Exception: The glazed areas shall not be requit�ed where artificial light and a mechanical ventilation
system, complying with one of the following, are provided.
1. The minimum ventilation rates shall be 50 cfm (24 L/s) for intermittent ventilation or 20 cfin
(10 L/s) for continuous ventilation. Ventilation air fi•om the space shall be e�iausted directly
to the outside.
2. Bathrooms that contain only a water closet, a lavatory, or water closet and a lavatory may be
ventilated with an approved mechanical recirculating fan or similar device designed to
remove odors from the air,
(IS)SecJio�i 602.6.1; arrrertd tlte follo�vi�tg:
R602.6.1 Drilling and notching of top plate. When piping or ductwork is placed in or partly in an
exterior wall or interior load-beat•ing wall, necessitating cutting, drilling or notching of the top plate by
more than 50 percent of its width, a galvanized metal tie not less than 0.054 inch thicic (1.37 mm) (16 Ga)
and 5 inches (127 mm) wide shall be fastened across and to the plate at each side of the opening with not
less than eight lOd (0.148 inch diameter) having a minimum length of 1'/2 inches (38 mm) at each side or
equivalent. Fasteners will be offset to prevent splitting of the top plate material. The metal tie must extend
a minimum of 6 inches past the opening. See figure R602.6.1.
10
(19)Figure R602.61; rlelete tlre frgav�e aitd iitsert t/te follotivirtg�gure:
NOTCH GREA
PERCENT OF
TOP
For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm
FIGURE R6Q2.6,1
TOP PLATE FRAMING TO ACCOMMODATE PIPING
WALL CONSTRUCTION
J54 IN.)AND 5 IN. WIDE
ASTENED ACROSS AND
tE AT EACH SIDE QF THE
i 8-16d NAILS EACH SIDE
(20)Sectiort R703.2; adrl se�rtence to sectio�r as follows:
R703.2 Water-resistive barrier. {existing section z�nclzanged}... The use of paint as a water-resistive
barrier will no longer be accepted as an exception to this code.
(21)Sectiorr R703.7.4.1; add a second paragr�rph to read as follows:
In stud framed exterior walls, all ties shall be anchored to studs as follows:
1. When studs are 16 in (407 mm) o.c., brick ties shall be spaced no furthet� apart than 24 in (737
mm) vertically starting approximately 12 in (381 mm) from the foundation; or
2. When studs are 24 in (610 mm) o.c., brick ties shall be spaced no further apart than 16 in (483
mm) vertically starting approximately 8 in (254 mm) from the foundation.
(22)Section R9021; A��ertd mad �rdd eaception #3 to read as follo►vs:
11
R902.1 Roofing covering materials. Roofs shall be covered with materials as set forth in Sections R904
and R905. Class A, B, or C roofing shall be installed. {i�emainder unchanged}
Exceptions:
1. {text unchanged}
2, {text a�nchanged}
3. Non-classiiied roof coverings shall be permitted on one-stoiy detached accessory structZires
used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses, provided the floor area does not
exceed (area deiined by jurisdiction).
(23)Section R907.1; ad�l a ser�terrce to read ns folloivs:
R907.1 General. Materials and methods of application used for re-covering or replacing an existing roof
covering shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 9. All individual replacement shingles or shakes
shall comply with Section R902.1, {Exception arnchanged}
(24) Sectiorts NII01 ilrrouglt N1103 shatl conform to the requirements of the 2009 International
Energy Conservation Code as amended by the City of Denton.
(25)Section M1305.1.3; cha�rge to read as follows:
M1305.1.3 Appliances in attics. Attics containing appliances requiring access shall be provided ...{bulk
of paragraph zmchanged} ... sides of the appliance where access is required. The clear access opening
dimensions shall be a minimum of 20 inches by 30 inches (508 mm by 762 mm), or larger and large
enough to allow removal of the largest appliance. As a minimum, access to the attre space, provide one of
the following:
1. A permanent stair.
2. A pull down stair with a minimum 300 lb (136 kg) capacity.
3. An access door from an upper floor level.
4. Access Panel may be used in lieu items 1, 2, and 3 with prior approval of the barilding offrcial due
to building conditions.
Exceptions:
1. The passageway and level service space are not requ'ved where the appliance can be
serviced and removed through the required opening.
2. Where the passageway is unobstructed,.. {remaining text u�changed}
(26)Section M1305.1.3.1; add tex t to read ns follows:
M1305.1.3.1 Electrical requirements. A luminaire controlled by a switch located at the required passage-
way opening and a receptacle outlet shall be installed at or near the appliance location in accordance with
Chapter 39. Low voltage wiring of 50 Volts or less shall be installed in a manner to prevent physical
damage.
(27)Sectiorr M1305.1.9.1; cltartge to reatl as follo�vs:
12
M1305.1.4.1 Ground clearance. Eqa�ipment and appliances supported from the ground shall be level and
f'vmly supported on a concrete slab or other approved material extending above the adjoining ground a
minimum of 3 inches (76 mm). Appliances suspended from the floor shall have a clearance of not less than
6 inches (152 mm) above the ground.
(28)Sectio�r M1305.1.4.3; add text to read as follows:
M1305.1.4.3 Electrical requirements. A luminaire controlled by a switch located at the required passage-
way opening and a receptacle outlet shall be installed at or near the appliance location in accordance with
Chapter 39. Low voltage wiring of 50 Volts or less shall be installed in a manner to prevent physical
damage.
(29)Section M1307.3.1; delete.
(30)Sectio�r M1411.3; cbarrge to rearl as follo�vs:
M1411.3 Condensate disposal. Condensate from all cooling coils or evaporators shall be conveyed from
the drain pan outlet to a sanitary sewer through a trap, by means of a direct or indirect drain unless
otherwise approved by a building official.. (i�ei�zaining text unchanged}
(31)Sectior: M1411.3.1, Itei�zs 3 arrd 4; add t��t to read as follows:
M1411.3.1 Auxiliary and secondary drain systems. {bz�lk ofparagraph td»changed}
1. {text unchanged}
2. {text unchanged}
3. An auxiliary drain pan... {bulk of text unchanged},., with Item 1 of this section. A water level
detection device may be installed only with prior approval of the bzrilding o�cial.
4. A water level detection device... {bzrllc of text atrrchanged}... overflow rim of such pan. A water
level detection device may be installed only with prior approval of the bzrilding offrcial.
(32)Sectio» M1411.31.1; add text to re�r�l as follows:
M1411.3.1.1 Water-level monitoring devices. On down-flow units ... (bulk of text arnchanged}.., installed
in the drain line. A water level detection device may be installed only with prior approval of the barildirrg
Off C7QI.
(33)Section MI 501; add nerv Section MI501.2 to read as follows:
M1501.2 Material and size. Exhaust ducts shall have a smooth intet•ior finish and shall be constructed of
metal a minimum 0.016-inch (0.4mm) thicic. The e�chaust duct size shall be 4 inches (102 mm) nominal in
diameter. Duct size shall not be reduced along its developed length or at termination.
(34)Section MI 501; adrl new Section MI501.3 to ��ead as follows:
M1501.3 Specified length. The maximum length of the exhaust duct shall be 35 feet (10668 mm) from the
connection to the transition duct from the appliance to the outlet terminal. Where fittings are used, the
maximum length of the e�aust duct shall be reduced in accordance with Table M1502.4.4.1.
(35)Section M2005.2; charrge to read «s follows:
13
M2005.2 Prohibited locations. Fuel-%red water heaters shall not be installed in a room used as a storage
closet. Water heaters located in a bedroom or batlu•oom shall be installed in a sealed enclosure so that
cornbustion ai�� will not be taken from the living space. Access to such enclosure may be from the bedroom
or bathroom when tlu•ough a solid door, weather-stripped in accardance with the exterior door air leakage
r•equirements of the Inter•national E�ergy Conse��vation Code and equipped with an approved self-closing
device. Installation of direct-vent water heaters within an enclosure is not required. Water heaters of any
type shall not be installed in attics; with exception of replacement of existing water heaters.
(36)Sectiorr G2408.3 (305.5); delete.
(37)Section G2412.5 (401.5); «dd a seco�td par�rgrapli to read as follotivs:
Both ends of each section of inedium pressure gas piping shall identify its operating gas pressure with an
approved tag. The tags are to be composed of aluminum or stainless steel and the following wording shall
be stamped into the tag:
"WARNING
1/2 to 5 psi gas pressure
Do Not Remove"
(38)Sectiorr G2413.3 (402.9.3); arlrl a�i exceptiorr to read ns follows:
Exception: Con•ugated stainless steel tubing (CSST) shall be a minimum of 1/2" (18 EDH).
(39)Section G2414.5 (403.5); c/1�r�rge to read as follo�vs:
G2414.5 (403.5) Metalic tubing. Seamless copper (shall not be used for natural gas systems), aluminum
alloy, or steel tubing shall be peimitted to be used with gases not corrosive to such material.
(40)Sectiort G2415.10.1 (404.91); delete.
(41)Sectiorr G241510 (90410); chtt�tge to read as follows:
G2415.10 (404.10) Minimurn burial depth. Underground piping systenas shall be installed a minimum
depth of 18 inches (457 mm) below grade, except as provided for in Section G2415.10.1.
(42)Sectio�i G2415.5; atld a sentence to read as follows:
G2415.5 (404.5) Protection against physical damage. {existing section with no changes}...CSST pipe
shall not be installed within insulated exterior walls nor within 12 inches of the connection between the top
plate of an insulated exterior wall and the roof rafteis.
(43)Section G2417.1 (406.1); clrailge to rerrd as follows:
G2417.1 (406.1) General. Prior to acceptance and initial operation, all piping installations shall be
inspected and pressz�re tested to determine that the materials, design, fabrication, and installation practices
comply with the requirements of this code. The per�mit holder shall make the applicable tests prescribed in
Sections 2417.1.1 through 2417.1.5 to determine compliance with the provisions of this code. The pe��nait
holder shall give reasonable advance notice to the building officral when the pipi»g syste�n is ready for
testing. The equipnaent, material, power and labor necessary for the inspections and test shall be furnished
by the perrnit holder and the pern�zt holder shall be responsible for determining that the worlc will withstand
the test pressure prescribed in the following tests.
(44)Sectio�r G2417.4; change to read as follows:
G2417.4 (406.4) Test pressure measurement. Test pressure shall be measured with a manometer or with
14
a pressure-measuring device designed and calibrated to read, recard, or indicate a pressure loss caused by
leakage during the pressu��e test period. The source of pressure shall be isolated before the pressure tests
are made. Gauges used to measure... {rernarnder unchanged)
(45)Sectiorr G2417.4.1; change to read ns folloivs:
G2417.4.1 (406.4.1) Test pressure. The test pressure to be used shall be not less than 3 psig (20 1cPa
gauge), or at the discretion of the Batilding Official, the piping and valves may be tested at a pressure of at
least six (6) inches (152 mm) of inercury, measured with a manometer or slope gauge. For tests requ'ving a
test pressure of 3 psig, gauges shall utilize a dial with a minimum diaphragm diameter of three and one half
inches (3 %2"), a set hand, measurement precision in increments of 1/10 psi or iiner and a pressure range not
to exceed 6 psi for tests requiring a pressw•e of 3 psig. For tests requiring a test pressure of 10 psig,
diaphragm gauges shall utilize a dial with a minimum diameter of tlu•ee and one-half inches (3 '/z"), a set
hand, measurement precision in increments of 2/10 psi or iiner, and a pressure range not to exceed 20 psi.
Far welded piping, and for piping carrying gas at pressures in excess of fourteen (14) inches water column
pressure (3.48 1cPa) (1/2 psi) and less than 200 inches of water column pressure (52.2 kPa) (7.5 psi), the test
pressure shall not be less than ten (10) pounds per square inch (69.6 1cPa). For piping carrying gas at a
pressure that exceeds 200 inches of water column (52,2 kPa) (7.5 psi), the test pressure shall be not less
than one and one-half times the proposed maximum working pressure.
(46)Section G2417.4.2; clta�tge to read as folloivs:
G2417.4.2 (406.4.2) Test duration. The test pressure shall be held for a length of time satisfactory to the
Buildirrg Offrcial, but in no case for less than fifteen (15) minutes. For welded pipirrg, and for pipi�g
cariying gas at pressures in excess of foui�teen (14) inches water column pressure (3.48 kPa), the test
pressure shall be held for a length of time satisfactory to the Building Offrcial, but in no case for less than
thirty (30) minutes.
(47)Section G2420.1 (406.1); atld Section G2420.1.4 to reac! as follows:
G2420.1.4 Valves in CSST installations. Shutoff valves installed with corrugated stainless steel (CSST)
piping systerras shall be supported with an approved termination iitting, or equivalent support, suitable for
the size of the valves, of adequate strength and quality, and located at intervals so as to prevent or damp out
excessive vibration but in no case greater than 12-inches from the center of the valve. Supports shall be
installed so as not to interfere with the free expansion and contraction of the system's piping, iittings, and
valves between anchors. All valves and supports shall be designed and installed so they will not be
disengaged by movement of the supporting piping.
(48)Section G24211 (4101); adrl text and Exception to read as follows:
G2421.1 (410.1) Pressure regulators. A line pressin�e regulator shall be ... {bullc of pa��agraph
unchanged}.,, appi�oved for outdoor installation. Access to regulators shall comply with the requirements
for access to appliances as specifed in Section M1305.
Exception: A passageway or level service space is not required when the regulator is capable of
being serviced and removed through the required attic opening.
(99)Section G2939.5 (619.6); cltmtge text to read ns follows:
G2439.5 (614.6) Domestic clothes dryer exhaust ducts. E�aust ducts for domestic clothes dryers shall
conform to the requirements of Sections G2439.5.1 through G2439.5.7. The size of duct shall not be
reduced along its developed length nor at the point of termination.
(50)Sectio�z G2445.2 (621.2); adrl Exceptiorr to reari as folloivs:
15
G2445.2 (621.2) Prohibited use. Ilnvented ��oom heatef•s shall not be used as the sole source of comfoi�t
heating in a dwelling unit.
Exception: Existing approved unvented ��oorn heater�s may continue to be used in d»�elling arnits, in
accordance with the code provisions in effect when installed, when app��oved by the Building Official
unless an unsafe condition is determined to exist as described in Internatronal Fuel Gas Code Section
108.7 of the Fuel Gas Code.
(SI)Section G2448.1.1 (624.1.1); cliange to read ns folloivs:
G2448.1.1 (624.1.1) Installation requirements. The requirements far water heaters relative to access,
sizing, �•elief valves, drain pans and scald protection shall be in accordance with this code.
(52)Sectiori P2503.6; cllarrge to read as folloivs:
P2503.6 Shower liner test. Where shower floors and receptors are made water tight by the application of
materials required by Section P2709.2, the completed liner installation shall be tested. The pipe from the
shower drain shall be plugged water tight for the test. Water shall be held in the section under test for a
period of 15 minutes. The system shall prove leak free by visual inspection.
(53)Section P2709.2; add Exceptioi7 to read �s follows:
Exception: Showeis designed to comply with ICC/ANSI A117.1.
(54)Section P2801.6; add E.�ceptio�t to read as follows:
Exceptions:
1. Elevation of the ignition source is not required for water heaters that are listed as flammable
vapor resistant and for installation without elevation.
2. Electric Water Heater.
(SS)Sectio�r P2803.6.1; cltartge to read as follows:
P2803.6.1 Requirements for discharge pipe.
5. Discharge to the outdoors.
(56)Section P2903.7; c/tartge to read as follows:
P2903.7 Size of water service mains, branch mains and risers. The minimum size water service pipe
shall be 1 inch. The size of water... {the remainder with no changes}.
(57)Sectio�r G3005.2.1; ttdd text to tlte entl of tltis sectiort to read as follofvs:
G3005.2.1 Materials. {existing section with no changes} ...All building cleanouts subject to vehicular
damage shall be cast iron.
(58)Section G3005.2J; change to read as folloivs:
G3005.2.7 Building drain and building sewer junction. There shall be a cleanout near.., Back to back
combination iittings shall be installed to serve as the required cleanouts for both the building drain and the
building sewer, unless other fittings are approved by the Building Ofiicial. The cleanout at the ....
16
(59)Section P3111; delete.
(60)Section P3112.2; delete a»d i�eplace ►vitla tlre follotiving:
P3112.2 Installation. Traps for island�sinks and similar equipment shall be roughed in above the floor and
may be vented by extending the vent as high as possible, but not less than the drainboard height and then
returning it downward and connecting it to the horizontal sink drain immediately downstream from the
vertical fixture drain. The return vent shall be connected to the horizontal drain tlu�ough a wye-branch
fitting and shall, in addition, be provided with a foot vent taken off the vertical fixture vent by means of a
wye-branch immediately below the floor and extending to the nearest partition and then through the roof to
the open air or may be connected to other vents at a point not less than six (6) inches (152 mm) above the
flood level rim of the iixtures served. Drainage fittings shall be used on all parts of the vent below the floor
level and a minimum slope of one-quarter (1/4) inch per foot (20.9 mm/m) back to the drain shall be
maintained. The return bend used under the drainboard shall be a one (1) piece fitting or an assembly of a
forty-iive (45) degree (0.79 radius), a ninety (90) degree (1.6 radius) and a forty-five (45) degree (0.79
radius) elbow in the order named, Pipe sizing shall be as elsewhere required in this Code. The island sink
drain, upstream of the return vent, shall seive no other iixtures. An accessible cleanout shall be installed in
the vertical portion of the foot vent.
(61)Citapters 34 throug/r 43; rlelete. Except for arlditional ame�trl�zent that follows, replace c%iapters 34
tl2rough and inclurli�Tg chupter 43 of the Interrratioital Residerrtzal Code with the National Electrical
Code as m�aended and adopted.
(62)Sectio�� E3301.1; add rrf�zerrd�r:ent to read as folJows:
Electricians holding a State Electrical Apprentice license shall be directly supervised by an electrician
holding a State Residential Wireman license.
(63)Appendix G Swif�u�zing Pools, Spas a�rd Hot Tubs. Adopt as pm7 of this code with the anieird`ne�1t as
follo ws:
Section AG105.2; charrged to read as follows:
AG105.2 Outdoor swimming pool. An outdoor swimming pool, including an in-ground, above-ground or
on-ground pool, hot tub or spa shall be surrounded by a barrier which shall comply with the following:
1. The top of the barrier shall be at least 60 inches above grade measured on the side of the barrier
which faces away from the swimming pool.
(64)Appendix HPatio Covers. Adopt as p�r�7 of tlrrs codes.
(65)Appendrx JExistiiTg Buildings anrl Structarres. Adopt as pa�7 of thrs code.
END
SECTION 4. Section 28-124 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby
amended to read as follows:
28-124. Deletions and amendments.
Amendments to the 2009 International Fuel Gas Code
(1)Sectiorr 102.2; ndd �rrr ezception to read ns follo�vs:
17
Exception: Existing dwelling units shall comply with Section 621.2.
(2)Sectio�i 102.8; cltarrge to read as follows:
102.8 Referenced codes and standards. The codes and standards referenced in this code shall be those
that are listed in Chapter 8 and such codes, when speciiically adopted, and standat•ds shall be considered
part of the requirements of this code to the prescribed extent of each such reference. Where differences
occur between provisions of this code and the referenced standards, the provisions of this code shall apply.
Whenever amendments have been adopted to the referenced codes and standards, each reference to said
code and standard shall be considered to reference the amendments as well. Any reference to NFPA 70 or
the ICC Electrical Code shall mean the Electrical Code as adopted.
(3)Sectio�t 30410; cltnnge to rearl ns follo►vs:
304.10 Louvers and grilles. The required size of openings for combustion, ventilation and dilution air
shall be based on the net fi�ee area of each opening. Where the free area tiv�ough a design of louver, grille or
screen is lcnown, it shall be used in calculating the size opening required to provide the free area specified.
Where the design and free area of louvers and grilles are not known, it shall be assumed that wood louveis
will have 25-percent free area and metal louvers and grilles will have 50-percent free area. Screens shall
have a mesh size not smaller than'/a inch (6.4 mm). Non-motorized louveis and grilles shall be fixed in the
open position. Motorized louvers shall be interlocked with the appliance so that they are proven to be in the
full open position prior to main burner ignition and during main burner operation. Means shall be pr•ovided
to prevent the main burner from igniting if the louvers fail to open during burner start-up and to shut down
the main burner if the louveis close during operation.
(4)Sectio�r 304.11; cha�rge #8 to rearl as follows:
304.11 Combustion air ducts. Combustion air ducts shall comply with all of the following:
1. Ducts shall be constructed of galvanized steel complying with Chapter 6 of the International
Mechanical Code or of a material having equivalent corrosion resistance, strength and rigidity.
Exception: Within dwellings units, unobstructed stud and joist spaces shall not be prohibited
from conveying combustion air, provided that no more than one required fireblocic is
removed.
Ducts shall terminate in unobstructed spaces allowing free movement of combustion au� to the
appliances.
3. Ducts shall serve a single enclosure.
4. Ducts shall not serve both upper and lower combustion air openings where both such openings are
used. The separation between ducts serving upper and lower combustion au• openings shall be
maintained to the source of combustion air.
5. Ducts shall not be screened where terminating in an attic space.
6. Horizontal upper combustion air ducts shall not slope downward toward the source of combustion
air.
7. The remaining space surrounding a chimney liner, gas vent, special gas vent or plastic piping
installed within a masonry, metal or factory-built chimney shall not be used to supply combustion
air.
Exception: Direct-vent gas-fired appliances designed for installation in a solid fuel-burning
fireplace where installed in accordance with the manufacturei's insh•uctions.
18
8. Combustion air intake openings located on the exterior of a building shall have the lowest side of
such openings located not less than 12 inches (305 mm) vertically from the adjoining ground level
or the manufacturer's recommendation, whichever is more restrictive.
(S)Section 305.5; delete flte section.
(6)Sectio�i 306.3; cliange to read as follows:
(M] 306.3 Appliances in attics. Attics containing appliances requiring access shall be provided ..,{barlk
of paragraph arnchanged} ... side of the appliance. The clear access opening dimensions shall be a
minimum of 20 inches by 30 inches (508 mm by 762 mm), or laiger where such dimensions are not large
enough to allow removal of the largest appliarrce. As a minimum, for access to the attic space, one or more
of the following are required:
5. A permanent stair.
6. A pull down stair.
7. An access door fi�om an upper floor level.
8. Access Panel may be used in lieu of items 1, 2, and 3 with prior approval of the code official due
to building conditions.
Exceptions:
1. The passageway and level service space are not required where the appliaf�ce is
capable of being serviced and removed tivough the required opening.
2. Where the passageway is not less than ... {bulk of section to read the same}.
(7)Sectio�r 306.5; clrarrge to read as folloivs:
[M] 306.5 Equipment and appliances on roofs or elevated structures. Where equipment requiring
access and appliances are installed on roofs or elevated structures at an aggregate height exceeding 16 feet
(4877 mm), such access shall be provided by a permanent approved means of access. Permanent exterior
ladders providing roof access need not extend closer than 12 feet (2438 mm) to the finish grade or floar
level below and shall extend to the eqzripnaent and appliances' level service space. Such access shall ...
{bulk of section to read the same}. ., on roofs having a slope greater than 4 units vertical in 12 units
harizontal (33-percent slope). ... {bul/c of section to read the same},
(8)Section 306; add Sectron 306.7�vi1h �ticeptimt artd sarbsectiott 306.7.1 to read as follows:
306.7 Water heaters above ground or floor. When the attic, roof, mezzanine or platform in which a
water heater is installed is more than eight (8) feet (2438 mm) above the ground or floor level, it shall be
made accessible by a stairway or permanent ladder fastened to the building.
Exception: A max 10 gallon water heater (or larger when approved by the code offician may be
accessed through a lay-in ceiling. A water heater installed not more than ten (10) feet (3048 mm)
above the ground or floor level may be accessed with a portable ladder.
306.7.1. Illumination and convenience outlet. Whenever the mezzanine or platform is not adequately
lighted, or access to a receptacle outlet is not obtainable from the main level, lighting and a receptacle
outlet shall be provided in accordance with Section 306.3.1.
(9)Sectio�r 401.5; add a second paragrnph to read as follo�vs:
19
Both ends of each section of inedium pressure corrugated stainless steel tubing (CSST) shall identify its
operating gas pressure with an approved tag. The tags are to be composed of aluminum or stainless steel
and the following wording shall be stamped into the tag:
° WARNING
1/2 to 5 psi gas pressure
Do Not Remove"
(10)Sectio�t 402.3; add an exception to read ns follows:
Exception: Corrugated stainless steel tubing (CSST) shall be a minimum nominal diameter of 1/2"
(18 EHD).
(11)Sectiorr 40410; cltmlge to read ns follows:
404.10 Minimum burial depth. Underground piping systems shall be installed a minimum depth of 18
inches (458 mm) top of pipe below grade.
(12)Section 40410.1; delete the sectiorr.
(13)Sectiort 406.4; clrange to read «s foJloivs:
406.4 Test pressure measurement. Test pressure shall be measured with a manometer or with a pressure-
measuring device designed and calibrated to read, record, or indicate a pressure loss caused by leakage
during the pressure test period. The source of pressure shall be isolated before the pressure tests are made.
(14)Sectiorr 406.4.1; cltmtge to read as follows:
406.4.1 Test pressure. The test pressure to be used shall be no less than 3 psig (20 kPa gauge), or at the
discretion of the Code Official, the �piping and valves may be tested at a pressure of at least six (6) inches
(152 mm) of inercmy, measured with a manometer or slope gauge. For tests requiring a pressure of 3 psig,
diaphragm gauges shall utilize a dial with a minimum diameter of tlu�ee and one half inches (3 '/2"), a set
hand, measurement precision in increments of 1/10 psi or finer, and pressure range not to exceed 6 psi for
tests requll•ing a pressure of 3 psig. For tests requiring a pressure of 10 psig, diaphragm gauges shall utilize
a dial with a minimum diameter of three and one-half inches (3 '/z"), a set hand, measurement precision in
increments of 2/10 psi or finer, and a pressure range not to exceed 20 psi. For welded piping, and for
piping carrying gas at pressures in excess of fourteen (14) inches water column pressure (3.48 kPa) (1/2
psi) and less than 200 inches of water column pressure (52.2 1cPa) (7.5 psi), the test pressure shall not be
less than ten (10) pounds per square inch (69.6 kPa). For piping carrying gas at a pressure that exceeds 200
inches of water column (52.2 kPa) (7.5 psi), the test pressure shall be not less than one and one-half times
the proposed maximum working pressure.
(IS)Section 406.4.2; change to read as follows:
406.4.2 Test duration. Test duration shall be held for a length of time satisfactory to the Code Official,
but in no case for less than iifteen (15) minutes. For welded piping, and for piping carrying gas at
pressures in excess of fourteen (14) inches water column pressure (3.48 kPa), the test duration shall be held
for a length of time satisfactory to the Code Ofiicial, but in no case for less than thirty (30) minutes. (Delete
remainder ofsection.)
(16)Section 409.1; arld Sectiorr 409.1.4 to rearl as follo►vs:
409.1.4 Valves in CSST installations. Shutoff valves installed with corrugated stainless steel (CSST)
piping systems shall be supparted with an approved termination fitting, or equivalent support, suitable for
the size of the valves, of adequate sri•ength and quality, and located at intervals so as to prevent or damp out
20
excessive vibration but in no case gt•eater than 12-inches from the center of the valve. Supports shall be
installed so as not to interfere with the free expansion and contraction of the system's piping, iittings, and
valves between anchors. All valves and supports shall be designed and installed so they will not be
disengaged by movement of the suppoi�ting piping.
(17)Section 410.1; add a secorrd paragrap/1 and exce�tion to ��ead as follows:
Access to regulators shall comply with the requirements for access to appliances as specifed in Section
306.
Exception: A passageway or level service space is not required when the regulator is capable of being
serviced and removed through the required attic opening.
(18)Sectiorr 619.6; add a sente�tce to read as follo►vs:
[M] 614.6 Domestic clothes dryer exhaust ducts. E�aust ducts for domestic clothes dryers shall conform
to the requirements of Sections 614.6.1 tlu�ough 614.6.7. The size of duct shall not be reduced along its
developed length nor at the point of termination.
(19)Sectiorl 621.2; add exceptioit as follorvs:
621.2 Prohibited use. Unvented room heate�s shall not be used as the sole source of comfort heating in a
dwelling unit.
Exception: Existing app��oved unvented heaters may continue to be used in dwelling units, in
accordance with the code provisions in effect when installed, when approved by the Code Ofiicial
unless an unsafe condition is determined to exist as described in Section 108.7.
(20)Sectio�� 624.11; clrarrge to read as follotivs:
624.1.1 Installation requirements. The requirements fot• water heateis relative to access, sizing, relief
valves, drain pans and scald protection shall be in accordance with the Inter•national Plurnbing Code.
END
SECTION 5. Section 28-145 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby amended
to read as follows:
28-145. Deletions and amendments.
Amendments to the 2009 International Plumbing Code
(1)Table of Conte�rts, Cltapte�� 7, Sectim� 714; el:m�ge to re[rd as follows:
714 Engineered Drainage Design . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
(2)Sectio�z 102.8; change to read as follows:
102.8 Referenced codes and standards. The codes and standards referenced in this code shall be those
that are listed in Chapter 13 and such codes, when specifically adopted, and standards shall be considered
as part of the requirements of this code to the prescribed extent of each such reference, Where the
differences occur between provisions of this code and the referenced standards, the provisions of this code
shall be the minimum requirements. Whenever amendments have been adopted to the referenced codes
and standards, each reference to said code and standard shall be considered to reference the amendments as
well. Any reference to NFPA 70 or the ICC Electrical Code shall mean the Electrical Code as adopted.
21
(3)Sections 106.6.2 and 106.6.3; change to read as follows:
106.6.2 Fee schedule. The fees for all plumbing work shall be as adopted by resolution of the governing
body of the jurisdiction,
106.6.3 Fee Refunds. The code official shall establish a policy for authorizing the refunding of fees.
{Delete balance of section}
(4)Sectiort 109; Delete erttire section mtd inser! the followi�rg:
SECTION 109
MEANS OF APPEAL
109.1 Application for appeal. Any person shall have the right to appeal a decision of the code official to
the board of appeals established by ordinance. The board shall be governed by the enabling ordinance.
(S)Section 305.6.1; clrarrge to read as follows:
305.6.1 Sewer depth. Building sewers shall be a minimum of 12 inches (304 mm) below grade.
(6)Sectio�r 305.9; cha�rge to read as follows:
305.9 Protection of components of plumbing system. Components of a plumbing system installed within
3 feet along alleyways, driveways, parking garages or other locations in a manner in which they would be
exposed to damage shall be recessed into the wall or otherwise protected in an approved manner.
(7)Sectiorr 310.9; �ielete.
(8)Sectiorr 310.5; delete.
(9)Sectiorrs 31210.1 alzd 312.10.2; cltange to read as follows:
312.101 Inspections. Annual inspections shall be made of all bacicflow prevention assemblies and air
gaps to determine whether they are operable. In the absence of local provisions, the owner is responsible to
ensure that testing is performed.
312.10.2 Testing. Reduced pressure principle bacicflow preventer assemblies, double check-valve
assemblies, pressure vacuum breaker assemblies, reduced pressure detector fire protection bacicflow
prevention assemblies, double checic detector fire protection backflow prevention assemblies, hose
connection backflow preventers, and spill-proof vacuum brealcers shall be tested at the time of installation,
immediately after repaiis or relocation and at least annually. The testing procedure shall be performed in
accordance with applicable local provisions. In the absence of local provisions, the owner is responsible to
ensure that testing is done in accordance with one of the following standards:
{list ofstandards unchanged}
(10)Section 314.2.1; chmrge to read as follows:
314.2.1 Conrlensate disposaL Condensate from all cooling coils and evaporators shall be conveyed from
the drain pan outlet to an approved place of disposal. ... {text unchanged} ... Condensate shall not discharge
into a street, alley, sidewalk, rooftop, or other areas so as to cause a nuisance.
(11)Sectio�t 314.2.2; cltartge fo read as follows:
314.2.2 Drain pipe materials and sizes. Components of the condensate disposal system shall be cast iron,
22
galvanized steel, copper, cross-linked polyethylene, polyethylene, ABS, CPVC, or schedule 80 PVC pipe
or tubing when exposed to ultra violet light. All components shall be selected for the pressut•e, temperature
and exposm�e rating of the installation. Joints and connections shall be made in accordance with the
applicable provisions of Chapter 7 relative to the material type. Condensate waste and drain line size shall
not be less than 3/4-inch (19 mm) internal diameter and shall not decrease in size fi�om the drain pan
connection to the place of condensate disposal. Where the drain pipes from more than one unit are
manifolded together for condensate drainage, the pipe or tubing shall be sized in accordance with Table
314.2.2. All horizontal sections of drain piping shall be installed in uniform alignment at a uniform slope.
(12)Sectiorr 401.1; add a settte�rce to ��ead ns follo�vs:
401.1 Scope. This chapter shall govern the materials, design and installation of plumbing fixtures, faucets
and iixture fittings in accordance with the type of occupancy, and shall provide for the minimum number of
fixtures for various types of occupancies. The provisions of this Chapter are meant to worlc in coordination
with the provisions of the Barilding Code. Should any conflicts arise between the two chapters, the Code
Official shall determine which provision applies.
(13)Sectiort 403.1.2; adrl Sectio�r 403.1.2 to read as folloivs:
403.1.2 Finish material. Finish materials shall comply with Section 1209 of the International Baiilding
Code.
(14)Section 405.6; delete.
(IS)Section 409.2; cl�arrge to read as follo►vs:
409.2 Water connection. The water supply to a commercial dishwashing machine shall be protected
against backflow by an air gap or backflow preventer in accordance with Section 608.
(16)Sectio�t 410.1; cl�a��ge to read as folloivs:
410.1 Approval. {existing text unchanged}...In other occupancies, where drinking fountains are required,
water coolers or bottled water dispenseis shall be permitted to be substituted for all required drinking
fountains. Drinking water shall be provided at no cost.
17)Section 912.4; change to read as follo►us:
412.4 Required location. Floor drains shall be installed in the following areas.
1. In public coin-operated laundries and in the central washing facilities of multiple family dwellings, the
rooms containing automatic clothes washeis shall be provided with floor drains located to readily drain the
entire floor area. Such drains shall have a minimum outlet of not less than 3 inches (76 mm) in diameter.
2. Commercial kitchens. In lieu of floor drains in commercial Icitchens, the code official may accept floor
sinks.
(18)Sectio�r 417.5; clrange to read ris follows:
417.5 Shower floors or receptors. Floor surfaces shall be constructed of impervious, noncorrosive,
nonabsorbent and waterproof materials.
Thresholds shall be a minimum of 2 inches (51 mm) and a maximum of 9 inches (229 mm), measured
from top of the drain to top of threshold or dam. Thresholds shall be of sufficient width to accommodate a
minimum twenty-two (22) inch (559 mm) door.
Exception: Showers designed to comply with ICC/ANSI A117.1.
23
(19)Sectio�r 41 � 5.2; clinrrge to read as follotivs:
417.5.2 Shower lining. Floors under shower compai�tments, except where prefabricated receptors have
been provided, shall be lined and made water tight utilizing material complying with Sections 417.5.2.1
through 417.5.2.5. Such liners shall turn up on all sides at least 3 inches (76 mm) above the finished
threshold level and shall extend outward over the tlu•eshold and fastened to the outside of the tlu�eshold
jamb. Liners shall be recessed and fastened to an approved backing so as not to occupy the space required
for wall covering, and shall not be nailed ar perforated at any point less than 1 inch (25 mm) above the
finished threshold. Shower floors shall be pitched one-fourth unit vei�tical in 12 units horizontal (2-percent
slope) and shall be sloped toward the fixture drains and be securely fastened to the waste outlet at the
seepage entrance, making a water-tight joint between the liner and the outlet. The completed liner shall be
tested in accordance with Section 312.9 and Section 417.7.
(20)Section 417.7; ndd Sectiort 417.7 fo read as follows:
417.7 Test for shower receptors. Shower receptors shall be tested for water tightness by filling with water
to the level of the rough threshold. The drain shall be plugged in a manner so that both sides of pans shall
be subjected to the test at the point where it is clamped to the drain.
(21)Section 419.3; c/range to ��ead as follows:
419.3 Surrounding material. Wall and floor space to a point 2 feet (610 mm) in front of a urinal lip and 4
feet (1219 mm) above the floor and at least 2 feet (610 mm) to each side of the urinal shall be waterproofed
with a smooth, readily cleanable, hard, nonabsorbent material.
(22)Section 502.3; clrarrge to ��ead as follows:
502.3 Water heaters installed in attics.
Attics containing a water heater shall be provided with an opening and unobstructed passageway large
enough to allow removal of the water heater. The passageway shall not be less than 30 inches (762 mm)
high and 22 inches (559 mm) wide and not more than 20 feet (6096 mm) in length when measured along
the centerline of the passageway from the opening to the water heater. The passageway shall have
continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches (610 mm) wide. A level service space at least 30 inches
(762 mm) deep and 30 inches (762 mm) wide shall be present at the fi�ont or service side of the water
heater. The clear access opening dimensions shall be a minimum of 20 inches by 30 inches (508 mm by
762 mm) , or larger where such dimensions are not large enough to allow removal of the water heater. All
discarded or abandoned water heaters shall be removed fi�om attics.
(23)Section 502.6; Add Section 502.6 to rea�l ns follo�vs:
502.6 Water heaters above ground or floor. When the attic, roof, mezzanine or platform iri which a
water heater is installed is more than eight (8) feet (2438 mm) above the ground or floor level, it shall be
made accessible by a stairway or permanent ladder fastened to the building.
Exception: A max 10 gallon water heater (or larger with approval) is capable of being accessed
through a lay-in ceiling and a water heater is installed is not more than ten (10) feet (3048 mm)
above the ground or floor level and may be reached with a portable ladder.
502.6.1 Illumination and convenience outlet. Whenever the mezzanine or platform is not adequately
lighted or access to a receptacle outlet is not obtainable from the main level, lighting and a receptacle
outlet shall be provided in accordance with Section 502.1.
(24)Sectiorr 504.6; change to reac! as follo►vs:
I�'
504.6 Requirements for discharge piping. The discharge piping serving a pressure relief valve,
temperature relief valve or combination thereof shall:
1. Not be directly connected to the drainage system.
2. Discharge through an air gap located in the same room as the water heater.
3, Not be smaller than the diameter of the outlet of the valve served and shall discharge full size to
the air gap.
4. Serve a single relief device and shall not connect to piping serving any other relief device or
equipment.
Exception: Multiple relief devices may be installed to a single T& P discharge piping system
when appr�oved by the administrative authority and permitted by the manufactures installation
instructions and installed with those instructions.
5. Discharge to an indirect waste receptor or to the outdoors. Where discharging to the outdoors in
areas subject to freezing, discharge piping shall be first piped to an indirect waste receptor through
an air gap located in a conditioned area.
6. Discharge in a manner that does not cause peisonal injury ar structural damage.
7. Discharge to a termination point that is readily observable by the building occupants.
8, Not be trapped.
9. Be installed so as to flow by gravity.
10. Not terminate less than 6 inches or more than 24 inches (152 mm) above grade nor more than 6
inches above the waste receptor.
11. Not have a threaded connection at the end of such piping.
12. Not have valves or tee iittings.
13. Be constructed of CPVC, Copper, Ductile iron, Galvanized steel, or Stainless steel.
(25)Section 604.4; add Sectio» 604.9.1 to read as follows:
604.4.1 State maximum flow rate. Where the State mandated maximum flow rate is more restrictive than
those of this section, the State flow rate shall take precedence.
(26)Section 606.1; delete itents #4 artrl #5.
(27)Sectio�: 606.2; clrarrge to ��ead as follo�vs:
606.2 Location of shutoff valves. Shutoff valves shall be installed in the following locations:
l. On the fixture supply to each pluinbing fxture other than bathtubs and showers in one- and two-
family residential occupancies, and other than in individual sleeping units that are provided with
unit shutoff valves in hotels, motels, boarding houses and similar occupancies.
2. On the water supply pipe to each appliance or mechanical equipment.
(28)Section 608.1; cltange to read as follows:
25
608.1 General. A potable water supply system shall be designed, installed and maintained in such a
manner so as to prevent contamination from non-potable liquids, solids or gases being introduced into the
potable water supply through cross-connections or any other piping connections to the system. Bacicflow
preventer applications shall conform to applicable local regulations, Table 608.1, and as specifcally stated
in Sections 608.2 through 608.16.10.
(29)Section 608.17; change to read as follows:
608.17 Protection of individual water supplies. An individual water supply shall be located and
constructed so as to be safeguarded against contamination in accordance with applicable local regulations.
In the absence of other local regulations, installation shall be in accordance with Sections 608.17.1 tivough
608.17.8.
(30)Section 610.1; add exceptiorr to read as follows:
610.1 General. New or repaired potable water systems shall be purged of deleterious matter and
disinfected prior to utilization. The method to be followed shall be that prescribed by the health authority or
water purveyor having jurisdiction or, in the absence of a prescribed method, the procedure described in
either AWWA C651 or AWWA C652, or as described in this section. This requirement shall apply to "on-
site" or "inplant" fabrication of a system or to a modular poi�tion of a system.
1. The pipe system shall be flushed with clean, potable water until dirty water does not appear at the
points of outlet.
2. The system or part thereof shall be iilled with a water/chlorine solution containing at least 50 parts
per million (50 mg/L) of chlorine, and the system or part thereof shall be valved off and allowed to
stand for 24 hours; or the system or part thereof shall be filled with a water/chlorine solution
containing at least 200 pai�ts per million (200 mg/L) of chlorine and allowed to stand for 3 houis.
3. Following the required standing time, the system shall be flushed with clean potable water until
the chlarine is purged fi•om the system.
4. The procedure shall be repeated where shown by a bacteriological examination that contamination
remains present in the system.
Exception: With prior approval the Code Official may wave this requirement when deemed
un-necessary by the Code Official.
(31)Section 708.3.7; adrt neiv sectio�z to read as follows:
708.3.7 Materiats. All building cleanouts subject to vehicular damage shall be cast iron.
708.3.5 Building drain and building sewer junction. {Existing section with no changes} ...All building
cleanouts subject to vehicular damage shall be cast iron.
(32)Section 712.5; add Sectior� 712. S to read as follows:
712.5 Dual Pump System. All sumps shall be automatically discharged and, when in any "public use"
occupancy where the sump serves more than 10 fixture units, shall be provided with dual pumps or ejectors
arranged to function independently in case of overload or mechanical failure. For storm drainage sumps
and pumping systems, see Section 1113.
(33)Section 714, 714.1; clrange to read as follows:
�
SECTION 714
ENGINE�RED DRAINAG� DESIGN
714.1 Design of drainage system. The sizing, design and layout of the drainage system shall be permitted
to be designed by appr�oved design methods.
(34)Sectiorr 802.4; add a se�rte�rce to tlie e�rd of the paragraph to read ns folloivs:
802.4 Standpipes. Standpipes shall be... {text atnchanged} ...drains for rodding. No standpipe shall be
installed below the ground.
(35)Sectiorr 904.1; cliarrge to read as follows:
904.1 Roof extension. All open vent pipes that extend through a roof shall be terminated at least six (6)
inches (152 mm) above the roof, except that where a roof is to be used for any purpose other than weather
protection, the vent extensions shall be run at least 7 feet (2134 mm) above the roof.
(36)Section 906.1; chrrnge to rea�! as follo►vs:
906.1 Distance of trap from vent. Each fixture trap shall have a protecting vent located so that the slope
and the developed length in the fixture drain from the trap weir to the vent fitting are within the
requirements set forth in Table 906.1.
(37)Sectio» 9121; clzartge fo read as follotivs:
912.1 Type of fixture. A combination drain and vent system shall not serve fixtures other than floor
drains, standpipes, and indirect waste receptors. Combination drain and vent systems shall not receive the
discharge fi�om a food waste grinder or clinical sink.
(38)Sectiorr 1002.10; delete.
(39)Sectiort 1003; see �tote below:
Sectio�t 1003.1; added to read as follows: Minimum construction standards for food service
establishments are required when:
1, A new building with a food seivice establishment is constructed and occupied;
2, Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a new food service establishment in an existing
structure which has not been previously used as a food service establishment within the last six (6) months,
or has been used as a food service establishment without an adequately sized grease interceptor; or.
3. When a change to a more restrictive class of food service establishment occurs.
Heavy Food Preparatiorr: shall mean any area in which foods are prepared utilizing a grill, griddle, deep-
fat fiyer, commercial type ovens, and/or any similar food preparation equipment; or any area subject to
flooding type of wet cleaning procedures due to the cutting or processing of ineat, poultry, fish or pork.
Heavy food preparation includes but is not limited to: cafeterias, fast food restaurant, full service
restaurants, pizza preparation, donut preparation, and meat and iish markets, etc. either a minimum 750-
gallon grease interceptor is required for heavy food preparation establishments with *seating capacity for
50 or more; or a minimum 250-gallon grease interceptor is required for heavy food preparation
establishments with a*seating capacity for less than 50 or talce-out food service establishments; or the
minimum size shall be established by the currently adopted International Plumbing Code; whichever is
more stringent.
Liglrt Food Preparatio�r: shall mean any area in which foods are prepared exclusive of the use of fryers,
grills or similar equipment. Light food preparation is usually limited to the preparation of hot dogs,
27
sandwiches, salads or other similar foods and fountain-type cold drinlcs. Light food preparation includes,
but is not limited to, sandwich shops, limited menu concession stands, etc. Either a minimum 250-gallon
grease interceptor is required for light food preparation establishments with *seating capacity for 50 or
more; or a minimum 20 gpm flow-through rating or 40-pound retention capacity grease ri�ap is required for
light food preparation establishments with a*seating capacity for less than 50 or take-out food service
establishments; or the minimum size shall be established by the currently adopted International Plumbing
Code; whichever is more stringent.
No Food P��epnratimr: shall mean any area in which foods are provided pre-wrapped, fi�om an approved
source, with microwave oven type heating being the maximum handling involved. No food preparation is
limited to pre-packaged sandwiches or similar foods, candies and containerized beverages. A grease
interceptor is not required for "no food preparation" establishments.
Food service establishments shall not share grease interceptors unless specifically authorized by the
Building Official.
*Seating Capacity is measured using Section 1004.7 Fixed Seating and Table 1004.1.1 Maximum Floor
Area Allowances per Occupant found in the currently adopted version of the International Building Code.
(40)Sectio�t 1101.8; c/iar7ge to re�rd as follows:
1101.8 Cleanouts required. Cleanouts shall be installed in the building storm drainage system and shall
comply with the provisions of this code for sanitary drainage pipe cleanouts.
Exception: Subsurface drainage system
(41)Sectio�r 1106.1; clrange to ��ead as folloivs:
1106.1 General. The size of the vertical conductors and leaders, building storm drains, building storm
sewers, and any horizontal branches of such drains or sewers shall be based on six (6) inches per hour
rainfall rate.
(42)Sectiori 1107.3; cl�ange to read as follows:
1107.3 Sizing of secondary drains. Secondary (emergency) roof drain systems shall be sized in
accordance with Section 1106. Scuppers shall be sized to prevent the depth of ponding water from
exceeding that for which the roof was designed as determined by Section 1101.7. Scuppers shall not have
an opening dimension of less than 4 inches (102 mm). The flow through the primary system shall not be
considered when sizing the secondary roof drain system.
(43)Section 1202.1; delete Exceptio�� 2.
END
SECTION 6. Section 28-252 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas is hereby
amended to read as follows.
28-252. Deletions and Amendments.
Amendments to the 2009 International Mechanical Code
(1)Sectiort 102.8; cJrafrge to read as follows:
102.8 Referenced codes and standards. The codes and standards referenced herein shall be those that are
listed in Chapter 15 and such codes, when specifically adopted, and standards shall be considered part of
28
the requirements of this code to the prescribed extent of each such reference. Where differences occur
between provisions of this code and the referenced standards, the provisions of this code shall apply.
Whenever amendments have been adopted to the referenced codes and standards, each reference to said
code and standard shall be considered to reference the amendments as well. Any reference to NFPA 70 or
the ICC Electrical Code shall mean the Electrical Code as adopted.
(2)Sectiorr 306.3; change to read as follows:
306.3 Appliances in attics. Attics containing appliances requiring access shall be provided ...{barllc of
paragraph unchanged} ... side of the appliance. The clear access opening dimensions shall be a minimum
of 20 inches by 30 inches (508 mm by 762 mm), or larger where such dimensions are not large enough to
allow removal of the laigest appliance. As a minimum, far access to the attic space, provide one of the
following:
9. A permanent stair.
10. A pull down stair with a minimum 300 lb (136 kg) capacity.
11. An access door fi•om an upper floor level.
12. Access Panel may be used in lieu of items 1, 2, and 3 with prior approval of the code official due
to building conditions.
Exceptions:
1. The passageway and level service space are not required where the appliance is capable
of being serviced and removed... {remaindef• of section unchanged}
(3)Sectiorr 306.5; change to read as follows:
306.5 Equipment and appliances on roofs or elevated structures. Where equipment requiring access
and appliances are installed on roofs or elevated structures at an aggregate height exceeding 16 feet (4877
mm), such access shall be provided by a permanent approved means of access. Permanent exterior laddeis
providing roof access need not extend closer than-12 feet (2438 mm) to the iinish grade or floor level
below and shall extend to the eqa�ipment and appliances' level service space. Such access shall ...
{language unchanged}. .. on roofs having a slope greater than 4 units vertical in 12 units horizontal (33-
percent slope). ... {rernaining langa�age unchangedj.
(9)Sectiort 306.5.1; clrarrge to rearl ns follows:
306.5.1 Sloped roofs. Where appliances, eguipment, fans or other components that requu�e service are
installed on roofs having slopes greater than 4 units vertical in 12 units harizontal and having an edge mare
than 30 inches (762 mm) above grade at such edge, a catwalk at least 16 inches in width with substantial
cleats spaced not more than 16 inches apart shall be provided from the roof access to a level platform at the
appliance. The level platform shall be provided on each side of the appliance to which access is required
for service, repair or maintenance. The platform shall be not less than 30 inches (762 mm) in any
dimension and shall be provided with guards. The guards shall extend not less than 42 inches (1067 mm)
above the platform, shall be constructed so as to prevent the passage of a 21-inch-diameter (533 mm)
sphere and shall comply with the loading requirements for guards specified in the International Batilding
Code.
(S)Section 306; add Section 306.6 to read ns follo�vs:
306.6 Water heaters above ground or floor. When the mezzanine or platform in which a water heater is
installed is more than eight (8) feet (2438 mm) above the ground or floor level, it shall be made accessible
by a stairway or permanent ladder fastened to the building.
29
Exception: A max 10 gallon water heater (or larger with approval) may be accessed tlu•ough a lay-in
ceiling. A water heater installed not more than ten (10) feet (3048 mm) above the ground or floor level
may be accessed with a portable ladder.
306.6.1 Whenever the mezzanine or platform is not adequately lighted or access to a receptacle outlet
is not obtainable fi�om the main level, lighting and a receptacle outlet shall be provided in accordance
with Section 306.3.1. �
(6)Sectio�r 307.2.2; clinrrge to read as follows:
307.2.2 Drain pipe materials and sizes. Components of the condensate disposal system shall be cast iron,
galvanized steel, copper, cross-linked polyethylene, polybutylene, polyethylene, ABS, CPVC or schedule
80 PVC pipe or tubing when exposed to ultra violet light. All components shall be selected for the
pressure, temperature, and exposure rating of the installation. {Remaining langa�age uncharrged}
(7)Sectiora 307.2.3; antend itern 2 to read ns follo►vs:
2. A separate overflow drain line shall be connected to the drain pan provided with the equipment. Such
overflow drain shall discharge to a conspicuous point of disposal to alert occupants in the event of a
stoppage of the primary drain. The overflow drain line shall connect to the drain pan at a higher level
than the primary drain connection. However, the conspicuous point shall not create a hazard such as
dripping over a walking surface or other areas so as to create a nuisance.
(8)Sectio�i 403.2.1; add rrrr iten: S to rend as folloivs:
5. Toilet rooms within private dwellings that contain only a water closet, lavatory or combination
thereof may be ventilated with an app��oved mechanical recirculating fan or similar device
designed to remove odors from the air.
(9)Sectiorr 504.6; add a sente�rce at tlre end of tfle paragraph to read «s follows:
504.6 Domestic clothes dryer ducts. Exhaust
requirements of Sections 504.6.1 through 504.6.7.
length nor at the point of termination.
(10)Section 607.5.1; c/ta�tge to read trs follows:
ducts for domestic clothes dryers shall conform to the
The size of duct shall not be reduced along its developed
607.5.1 Fire Walls. Ducts and air transfer openings permitted in fire walls in accordance with Section
705.11 of the International Building Code shall be protected with listed fire dampers installed in
accordance with their listing. For hazardous e�aust systems see Section 510.1-510.9 IMC.
SECTION 2. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or
circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provision or applications, and to this end
the provision of this ordinance are severable.
SECTION 3. All provisions of the ordinances of the City of Denton in conflict with the provision
of this ordinance are hereby repealed, and all other provisions of the ordinances of the City or Denton, not
in conflict with the provision of this ordinance, shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be
fined a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00). Each day that a provision of this Ordinance is
violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offence.
30
SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective October 1, 2012 and the City Secretaiy is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record
Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2012
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
:•
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
ANITA BURGESS, CITY ATTORNEY
�
`� � � „� ,�-s
BY: .r� ��,. �, e!���;
,�t;, �„x ..�
MARK A. BURROUGHS, MAYOR
31
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
AGENDA DATE: August 14, 2012
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Development, Building Inspections Division
ACM: Fred Greene, Neighborhood Services ;�;�
SUBJECT
Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding an ordinance to adopt the
2011 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the City.
BACKGROUND
The current 2005 National Electrical Code as amended was adopted on Febniary 7, 2006.
The 2011 National Electrical Code was published by the National Fire Protection Association
early 2010. Subsequent to its publication, the Electrical Board of the North Central Texas
Council of Governments conducted a review of the Code. As a result of their review, the
Electrical Board recommended several amendments to the codes. The recommended C.O.G.
amendments were then presented to the municipalities within the 16-county north central Texas
region for consideration for adoption.
The City of Denton Building Inspections staff began reviewing the C.O.G. amendments early in
2011 with the goal of adoption in early 2012.
On January 31, 2012, the amended 2011 electrical code was presented to approximately 50 area
professionals including builders, contractors, plumbers, mechanical contractors, architects, and
engineers. During the presentation, staff highlighted the most significant changes from the 2005
electrical code to the 2011 version of the electrical code. The presentation information was
received well by those in attendance. A copy of the proposed 2011 Electrical Code adoption
ordinance is posted on the Building Inspections webpage.
On Febniary 16, 2012, the amended 2011 National Electrical Code was presented to the Health
and Building Standards Commission (HaBSCo). The HaBSCo commissioners voted
unanimously to recommend adoption of the 2011 Code as amended to the City Council;
however, the commissioners suggested to delete the requirement to install Arc-Fault Circuit-
Internipter protection for all 15 and 20 ampere branch circuits in the rooms not protected with a
Ground-Fault Circuit-Internipter protection device of all dwelling units. However, the State of
Texas has adopted the 2011 National Electrical Code "as the "minimum standard" for all
electrical work in Texas" which would over-ride this recommendation from the Health and
Building Standards Commission.
On March 6, 2012 the draft ordinance of the 2011 National Electrical Code was presented to the
City Council at a worlc session. The City Council requested that a presentation of the proposed
ordinance be made to the Chamber of Commerce.
Agenda Information Sheet
August 14, 2012
Page 2
On March 28, 2012 the draft ordinance of the 2011 National Electrical Code was presented to the
Chamber of Commerce. As a result of the meeting with the Chamber of Commerce, the members
present during the presentation had some concerns with the proposed code adoptions and these
concerns are reflected in the following five questions:
1. What other cities in North Texas have adopted the 2009 Building Code amendments?
2. What other cities in North Texas are on a newer code; 2012, 2015?
3. What other cities in North Texas adopted a 10% or more increase in the energy code?
4. What is the increased effective cost of adopting the changes to the builder?
5. What is the effective cost of implementing the independent energy inspections over
adding staff to complete the final energy inspections?
The answers to these questions have been delivered to the Chamber of Commerce and made
available to the City Manager's Office. We have not received any additional responses from the
Chamber.
FISCAL IMPACT
Staff does not anticipate any fiscal impact to the City as a result of adopting this Code.
OPTIONS
1. Postpone consideration and provide staff with further direction.
2. Adopt the 2011 National Electrical Code as recommended.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the 2011 National Electrical Code along with staff
recommended amendments.
EXHIBIT
Febniary 16, 2012 HaBSCo Commission Minutes
Chamber of Commerce Questions and Staff Reponses
Proposed 2011 National Electrical Code Ordinance
Respectfully prepared and submitted by,
` �f
Kurt Hansen.
Building Official
Respectfully submitted:
�
Marlc Cunningham, AICP, CPM
Minutes
Health and Building Standards Commission
February 16, 2012
Members present: Jana�T Tieken, Jim Strange, Jeff Wa���ro, Rod Reeves, Rosanne Ciccia and
GanT Robinson
Members absent: David Hoenig
Staff inembers present: Kurt Hansen, Glenda Gailliard, ZacicenT Loiselle, Dean Bra�T and Chacl
Weldon
Welcome and Call to Order
Kurt Hansen, Building Official, called the meeting to order at 4:OSp.m.
Consider approval of the minutes of May 19, 2011
Jim Strange made a motion to approve the minutes of Ma�T 19, 2011.
Seconded b�T Rosanne Ciccia. Motion carried 6-0.
Elect a chair for the Health and Building Standards Commission
Kurt requested that all members introduce themselves.
Jana�T Tielcen moved that Jim strange be the ne��� Chairman and Jeff Wa���ro be the
Vice Chairman. Seconded b�T Rosanne Ciccia.
Review the requirements for Commissioners, including: Attorney General's Open
Meetings Training, and City of Denton Handbook for Boards, Commissions, and
Council Committees
Jennifer Walters came forward and gave a brief description and overview of
each.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2009 International Fire Code as
amended by the City and make recommendation to the City Council.
Dean Bra�T (Fire Protection Engineer Associate) and Chacl Weldon (Assistant Fire
Marshall) came for��� ard. Chad gave a slide presentation and briefed the
Commissioners on the acloption of the 2009 International Fire Code.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Janay Tielcen made a motion to recommend to the City Council the
adoption of the 2009 International Fire code as amended by the City.
Seconded by Rod Reeves. Motion carrie 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2009 International Building
Code as amended by the City, 2009 International Residential Code as
amended by the City, 2009 International Plumbing Code as amended by the
City, 2009 International Mechanical Code as amended by the City, and the
2009 International Fuel Gas Code as amended by the City and make
recommendation to the City Council.
Kurt Hansen, came fon��ard and presented a slide presentation and briefed
the Commissioners on the adoption of the 2009 International Building
Code as amended b�T the Cit�T, 2009 International Residential Code as
amended b�T the Cit�T, 2009 International Plumbing Code as amended b�T the
Cit�T, 2009 International Mechanical Code as amended b�T the Cit�T, and the
2009 International Fuel Gas Code as amended b�T the Cit�T.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Rosanne Ciccia made a motion to recommend to the City Council the
adoption of the 2009 IBC, the 2009 IRC, the 2009 IPC, the 2009 IMC, and
the 2009 IFGC, as amended by the City. Seconded by Janay Tieken. Motion
carrie 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2011 National Electrical Code as
amended by the City and make recommendation to the City Council.
Kurt Hansen, came fon��ard and presented a slide presentation and briefed
the Commissioners on the acloption of the 2011 National Electrical Code
as amended b�T the Cit�T.
There ��� as a brief question and ans��� er session.
Jeff Wa���ro macle a motion to recommend to the Cit�T Council the acloption of the
2011 National Electrical Code ���ith the consideration to delete the requirement
to install Arc-Fault Circuit-Internipter protection for all 15 and 20 ampere
branch circuits in the rooms not protected with a Ground-Fault Circuit-
Internipter protection device of all dwelling units and maintain the current
code requirement. Seconded by Rod Reeves. Motion carried 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the amendments to the 2009
International Energy Conservation Code by the City and make recommendation to
the City Council.
There ��� as a brief question and ans��� er session.
Jana�T Tielcen made a motion to recommend to the Cit�T Council the acloption the
ne��� amendments to the 2009 International Energ�T Conservation Code. Seconded
b�T Rosanne Ciccia. Motion carried 6-0
Hold a discussion about the HaBSCo meeting schedule for March 15, 2012.
The neztmeeting ���ill be held March 15, 2012.
Under Section _5_51.042 of the Texas Open Meeting Act. Hold a discussion
and set the date for future CAAB meetings. Under Section _5_51.042 of the Texas
Open Meetings Act, Under Section 551.042 of the Texas Open Meetings Act,
respond to inquiries from the City Council or the public with specific factual
information or recitation of policy, or accept a proposal to place the matter on the
agenda for an upcoming meeting AND Under Section _5_51.041_5 of the Texas Open
Meetings Act, provide reports about items of community interest regarding which
no action will be taken, to include: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or
condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; an honorary or salutary
recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen; a reminder about
an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing body; information
regarding a social, ceremonial, or community event organized or sponsored by an
entity other than the governing body that was attended or is scheduled to be
attended by a member of the governing body or an official or employee of the
municipality; or an announcement involving an imminent threat to the public
health and safety of people in the municipality that has arisen after the posting of
the agenda.
Adjourn
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 5:24 p.m.
Jim Strange,
HaBSCo Chairman
Jeff W a��� ro,
Co-Chairman
Glenda Gailliard, Permit Technician
Supervisor, Cit�T of Denton
Chamber of Commerce Questions with Staff Responses
KURT NANSEN: 2009 Building Codes—July 13, 2012
1. What other cities in North Texas have adopted the 2009 Building Code amendments?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: Out of the 23 cities which responded to my survey, 15 Cities have already adopted the 2009
Building Codes.
2. What other cities in North Texas are on a newer code; 2012, 2015?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: There are currently no cities on the 2012 Building Codes, however, 11 of these cities are
scheduled to adopt the 2012 Building Codes within the first 6 months of next year. This is probably due
to the fact that the NCTCOG amendments will not be published until the end of 2012.
3. What other cities in North Texas adopted a 10% or more increase in the energy code?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: Along with the City of Denton, only 2 other cities (Frisco and Plano) have requirements more
stringent than the 2009 Energy Code.
City Adopted the 2009 Planned Adoption Surpass the IECC Require 3rd Party
Code of 2012 Requirements Energy Inspectors
for Res & Comm
Rockwall 2-6-2012 3 years No Yes, both
Allen 5-24-2011 ? No Yes, both
Garland 1-2-2012 ? No In-house
Benbrook 12-2012 1-1-2013 No Res, no — Comm,
yes
Bedford 3-22-2011 ? No Yes, both
Frisco IECC only, 5-2012 9-2012 Energy Star only — Res, yes — Comm,
for all others considering IECC no
2009 +15%
Lancaster No ? No Yes, both
Carrollton 2-11-11 1-1-2013 No In-house
Grand Prairie 2-2011 No, 2015 No Yes, both
Celina No ? No Yes, both
Irving No, May or June No, 2015 No No, just Energy
2012 Star
Waco 1-1-2010 1-1-2013 No No, but accept
their reports
McKinney No Fall, 2012 No Yes, both
Arlington 5-24-2012 ? No In-house
Plano 1-2011 1-2013 Yes, 15% above Yes, both
Wylie No 4-2013 No Yes, both
University Park 2010 ? No In-house
Prosper No 3-2013 No Yes, both
Nurst 04-2011 No, 2015 No In-house
Coppell 1-11-12 1-2013 No
Dallas No 3-2013 No Yes, both
Colleyville 10-2012 ? No Yes, both
Southlake 4-2011 7-2013 No No, but accept
their reports
4. What is the increased effective cost of adopting the changes to the builder?
Answer: For a typical new home, an added cost of approximately $425.00
Note: As indicated on the chart below, by adopting the 2009 Building Codes along with the 2011
Electrical Code, the major additional requirements for a new home include adding a carbon monoxide
detector, adding more arc fault circuit interrupters, and also adding tamperproof receptacles.
2005 NEC or 2006 I- 2011 NEC or 2009 Approximate Cost
Code Requirement Extended Cost
Codes I-Codes Increases
Carbon monoxide No requirement Required $50 each $100.00
Detector
Arc Fault Circuit In sleeping rooms In all rooms $45 each $315.00
Interrupters only (approximately without GFCI (approximately 7
3 AFCIs) protection more AFCIs)
Tamperproof No Requirement In all 15 & 20 amp $1.25 each $12.50
Receptacles (approximately 25 wall receptacles (approximately 25
receptacles @ $0.75 receptacles at and
each) increase of $.50
each)
Total Increase $427.50
5. What is the effective cost of implementing the independent inspection outlined in 506.4.2 over
adding staff to complete the inspections?
Answer: Before I address the cost of adding staff to perform final energy inspections, I will share
my findings in regards to hiring a 3rd party energy inspection company to perform energy
inspections. The effective cost of a final energy inspection will vary from project to project
depending on the size and the energy needs of each project. Nowever, from my research with
three local 3rd party energy inspection companies, costs average approximately $0.10 per square
foot for a 5,000 Sq Ft project, or about $500.00. This cost includes the preliminary ComCheck
report and a full final inspection. Also, the cost per square foot does decreases as the project
increases in size.
Now, what would be the cost of hiring additional staff to perform commercial energy
inspections? The annual cost for a Commercial Building Inspector, plus benefits, plus a vehicle is
approximately $95,000. In the past year, the city inspectors performed approximately 270
commercial and commercial alteration energy inspections. By dividing $95,000 by 270
inspections, the average cost per energy inspection would be approximately $350.00. I could
add an additional permit fee of $350.00 on each commercial project or I could look at a price per
sq ft. The price per sq ft would be somewhere around 7 cents, and so for example, at 7 cents
per sq ft, an energy inspection on a 5,000 sq ft project would cost $350.00.
In conclusion, with the addition of a Commercial Building Inspector to my staff, my City staff
would be able to do a thorough energy inspection for each commercial or commercial alteration
project.
Note: Remember, this proposal is only for Commercial and Commercial Alteration permits. Residential
projects are required to have a duct and a house tightness test performed and the builders are already
providing this information to the inspectors.
With the current staff of inspectors and the current workload, the City has not been able to verify, as
thoroughly as possible, the final state of the compliance of these projects with the requirements of the
Energy Code. Since verifying a projects compliance with the Energy Code is not typically a life/safety
issue, my current staff does their best, with the resources available; to see that energy requirements are
met.
With each new addition of the Energy Code, the requirements are growing more stringent and more
complicated. As you can see from the first chart above, thirteen (more than half) of the twenty three
cities surveyed require verification from 3rd party energy inspections for both residential and commercial
properties; only nine of the twenty three cities surveyed perform their own energy inspections or they
accept the reports from 3rd party energy inspectors. I think that in the near future, more and more
Cities will be requiring 3rd party verification, or they will be hiring highly trained and skilled energy
inspectors to perform all their energy inspections.
s:\(egal\our documents\ordinances\12\etectrical code ordinance 2011.doc
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE III OF CHAPTER 28 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, (`BLECTRICAL CODE") BY REPEALING THE 2005 NATIONAL
ELECTRICAL CODE WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION
OF THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE WITH CERTAIN DELETIONS AND
AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2000.00 FOR
VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That Section 28-61 of Article III of Chapter 28 of the Code of Ordinances of the City
of Denton, Texas, is hereby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 28-61. Adoption of electrical code.
The 2011 National Electrical Code as published by the National Fll•e Protection Association, a copy of
which shall be iiled with the office of the City Secretary and available for public inspection, is hereby
adopted and designated as the electrical code of the city, the same as though that edition of such code were
copied at length herein, subject to deletions and amendments enumerated in Section 28-62.
SECTION 2. That Section 28-62 of Article III of Chapter 28 of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of Denton is hereby amended to read as follows.
Sec. 28-62. Deletions and Amendments
The National Electrical Code adopted by Section 28-61 is amended as follows:
Amendments to the 2011 National Electrical Code
(1)A��ticle 100, Pa�7I; a�reirrl tlre fo/lowing defrnitiorr:
Intersystem Bonding Termination. A device that provides a means far connecting bonding conductors for
communication systems and other systems such as metallic gas piping systems to the grounding electrode
system.
(2)Article 110.5; climige t/ie following to rearl as folloivs:
110.5 Conductors. Conductors normally used to carry cun•ent shall be of copper, or may be of aluminum if
2 AGW or larger and may be used only for service panelboards or sub-panelboard service feeders. Where
conductor material is not specified, the material and the size...(the rest of the paragraph as written.)
(3)Article 110.2; cl�a»ge the follorving to read as follows:
110.2 Approval. The conductars and equipment required ar permitted by this Code shall be acceptable
only if approved. Approval of equipment may be evident by listing and labeling of equipment by a
Nationally Recognized Testing Lab (NRTL) with a certification mark of that laboratory or a qualified third
party inspection agency approved by the AHJ.
Exception: Unlisted equipment that is relocated to another location within a juf•isdiction or is field
modified is szrbject to the approval by the AHJ. This approval may be by a freld evaluatron by a NRTL o�•
qualified third parry inspectiorr agerrcy app�•oved by the AHJ.
Manufacturer's self-certiiication of any equipment shall not be used as a basis for approval by the AHJ.
Informational Note: See 90.7, Examination of Equipment for Safety, and 110.3, Examination,
Identification, Installation, and Use of Equipment. See deiinitions of Approved, Identrfred,
Labeled, and Listed.
(4)Artrcle 210.8(A)(1); c/range to re�rd as follows:
210.8(A)(1) Divelli�rg units. Battu•oom, the Ground-Fault Circuit-Interruption device shall be located in the
bathroom served,
(S)Article 230.2; add seittettce to enrl of sectio�r to read as folloivs:
230.2 Ntrtt:ber of Se��vices. {no changes to current section} ... The height of the meter, measured fi•om finish
grade, shall be between a minimum height of 4 feet to a maximum of 6 feet measured to the center of the
glass.
(1) Readily Accessible Location, The service discortnection means shall be irrstalled at a�°eadily
accessible location on the outside of a building or structZr��e »earest the service.
(6)Article 230.70(A)(1); chmlge to read as follows:
(1) Readily Accessible Location. The service disconnection n7eans shall be installed at a readily
accessible location on the oattside of a building or str�zrctu��e nearest the service.
(7)A��ticle 240.91; delete tlteArticle.
(8)Article 310.15(B)(7); charrge to read as follows:
(7) 120/240-Volt, 3-Wire, Single-Phase Dwelling Services aud Feeders. For dwelling units, conductors,
as listed in Table 310,15(B)(7), shall be...{text unchanged}...provided the requirements of 215.2, 220.61,
and 230.42 are met. This Article shall not be used in conjunction with 220.82.
(9)Article 500.8(A)(3); c/ta�rge !o ��ead as folloivs:
500.8 Equipment. Articles 500 through 504 require equipment construction and installation standards that
ensure safe performance under conditions of proper use and maintenance.
Informational Note No. 1: It is important that inspection authorities and users exercise more than
ordinary care with regard to installation and maintenance.
Informational Note No. 2: Since there is no consistent relationship between explosion properties
and ignition temperature, the two are independent requirements.
Informational Note No, 3: Low ambient conditions require special consideration. Explosion proof
or dust-ignition proof equipment may not be suitable for use at temperatures lower than -25°C (-
13°F) unless they are identified for low-temperature service. However, at low ambient
temperatures, flammable concentrations of vapors may not exist in a location classiiied as Class I,
Division 1 at normal ambient temperature.
(A) Suitability. Suitability of identified equipment shall be determined by one of the following:
(1) Equipment listing or labeling
(2) Evidence of equipment evaluation from a qualified testing laboratoiy or inspection agency concerned
with product evaluation
(3) Evidence acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction such as a manufacturer's self-evaluation or an
engineering judgment signed and sealed by a qualified Licensed Professional Engineer.
Informational Note: Additional documentation for equipment may include certificates
demonstrating compliance with applicable equipment standards, indicating special conditions of
use, and other pei�tinent information. Guidelines for certificates may be found in ANSI/ISA
12.00.02, Certrfrcate Standard fo�• AEx Equipment for Haza��dous (Classified) Locations.
(10)Article 505.7(A) changed to read as follows:
505.7 Special Precaution. Article 505 requires equipment construction and installation that ensures safe
performance under conditions of proper use and maintenance.
Informational Note No. 1: It is important that inspection authorities and users exercise more than
ordinary care with regard to the installation and maintenance of electrical equipment in hazardous
(classified) locations.
Informational Note No. 2: Low ambient conditions require special consideration. Electrical
equipment depending on the protection techniques described by 505.8(A) may not be suitable for
use at temperatures lower than -20°C (-4°F) unless they are identified for use at lower
temperatures. However, at low ambient temperatures, flammable concentrations of vapors may not
exist in a location classified Class I, Zones 0, 1, or 2 at normal ambient temperature.
(A) Implementation of Zone Ctassification System. Classification of areas, engineering and design,
selection of equipment and wiring methods, installation, and inspection shall be performed by a qualifed
Licensed Professional Engineer.
(11)Article 680.25(A) charrged to read �rs follo�vs:
680.25 Feeders. These provisions shall apply to any feeder on the supply side of panelboards supplying
branch circuits for pool equipment covered in Part II of this article and on the load side of the service
equipment or the source of a separately derived system.
(A) Wiring Methods.
(1) Feeders. Feeders shall be installed in rigid metal conduit or intermediate metal conduit. The following
wiring methods shall be permitted if not subject to physical damage:
(1) Liquidtight flexible nonmetallic conduit
(2) Rigid polyvinyl chloride conduit
(3) Reinforced thermosetting resin conduit
(4) Electrical metallic tubing where installed on or within a building
(5) Electrical nonmetallic tubing where installed within a building
(6) Type MC cable where installed within a building and if not subject to corrosive environment
(7) Nonmetallio-sheathed cable
(8) Type SE cable
Exception: An existing feeder betH�een an existing ren�ote panelboard and sei�vice equipmerrt shall be
permitted to rurr in flexible metal conduit or an app��oved cable assernbly that includes an equiprnent
groarnding conductor within its outer� sheath. The equipment grounding conductor shall co»�ply with
250.24(A) (5).
END
SECTION 3. If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or
circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end
provisions of this ordinance are severable.
SECTION 4. All provisions of the ordinances of the City of Denton in conflict with the provisions
of this ordinance are hereby repealed, and all other provisions of the ordinances of the City of Denton, not
in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be
fined a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2000.00). Each day that a provision of this ordinance is
violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall become effective October 1, 2012 and the City Secretary is
hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-
Chronicle, the ofiicial newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its
passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2012.
MARI{ A. BURROUGHS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
:'
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
ANITA BURGESS, CITY ATTORNEY
_ r .-�°�
�
� ,
f �.
� � � �
BY: ' �' ^ ' "
�. E -��d,�, �.,, �, ,, ��.�
AGENDA DATE:
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
August 14, 2012
DEPARTMENT: Fire
ACM:
Fred Greene
��,
�
Questions concerning this
may be directed to
Rick Jones 349-8860
SUBJECT
Receive report, hold discussion, and give staff direction regarding the proposed adoption of an
ordinance amending Chapter 29 of the Code of the City of Denton, Texas, to provide for the
adoption of the International Fire Code, 2009 Edition.
FILE INFORMATION
The "International Codes" were introduced to provide a model code with national consistency.
The International model codes consist of: International Residential Code; International Building
Code; International Mechanical Code; International Fuel Gas Code; International Plumbing
Code; and International Fire Code. The International Codes are intended to provide regulations
that safeguard public health and safety in all communities. Because the Codes are designed to be
national, local amendments are required to meet the needs of local jurisdictions. The North
Texas Regional Council of Governments has participated in the development of local regional
amendments. Several of these amendments are found in the Code that is proposed for adoption.
In an effort to provide consistency, the 2000 International Codes were first adopted by the City
of Denton in Febniary of 2002. Prior to the adoption of the 2000 International Codes, the City of
Denton, lilce most other cities in the Metroplex, had adopted the Uniform Codes. The "2009
International Fire Code" has since been introduced after a lengthy review process through the
International Code Council, (ICC}. Changes to the International Codes are brought about by
new technology and events that have occurred throughout the nation. The maj ority of the
changes are related to health and safety. The purpose of the International Codes is to establish
the minimum requirements to safeguard the public health, safety and general welfare through
stnictural strength, means of egress facilities, stability, sanitation, adequate light and ventilation,
energy conservation, and safety to life and property from fire and other hazards attributed to the
built environment. The Fire Department has performed a comprehensive local review of these
changes. In addition, the 2009 International Fire Code and local amendments were presented, in
a public meeting, to local building contractors, sub-contractors, and other interested parties.
PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions)
On Febniary 16, 2012 the Health and Building Standards Commission unanimously voted to
support and recommend the adoption of the 2009 International Fire Code along with staff
recommended amendments.
The 2009 International Fire Code was presented to City Council at the March 6, 2012 Worlc
Session. The City Council requested that a presentation of the proposed ordinance be made to
the Chamber of Commerce.
Agenda Information Sheet
August 14, 2012
Page 2
On March 28, 2012 the draft ordinance of the proposed changes to the 2009 Energy Code was
presented to the Chamber of Commerce. As a result of the meeting with the Chamber of
Commerce, the members present during the presentation had some concerns with the proposed
code adoptions and these concerns are reflected in the following five questions:
1. What other cities in North Texas have adopted the 2009 Building Code amendments?
2. What other cities in North Texas are on a newer code; 2012, 2015?
3. What other cities in North Texas adopted a 10% or more increase in the energy code?
4. What is the increased effective cost of adopting the changes to the builder?
5. What is the effective cost of implementing the independent energy inspections over
adding staff to complete the final energy inspections?
The answers to these questions have been delivered to the Chamber of Commerce and made
available to the City Manager's Office. We have not received any additional responses from the
Chamber.
FISCAL INFORMATION
There is no fiscal impact to the City with the adoption of the proposed Codes.
OPTIONS
1. Postpone consideration and provide staff with further direction.
2. Adopt the Ordinance amending Code of Ordinances Chapter 29 and adopting the 2006
International Fire Code and local amendments
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that
Conservation Code.
the City Council adopt this amended 2009 International Energy
EXHIBITS
Febniary 16, 2012 HaBSCo Commission Minutes
Chamber of Commerce Questions with Staff Responses
Proposed Ordinance amending Code of Ordinances Chapter 29 and adopting the 2006
International Fire Code and local amendments.
Respectfully submitted:
./���
��
Ricic Jones; 940-349-8860
Fire Marshal
Minutes
Health and Building Standards Commission
February 16, 2012
Members present: Jana�T Tieken, Jim Strange, Jeff Wa���ro, Rod Reeves, Rosanne Ciccia and
GanT Robinson
Members absent: David Hoenig
Staff inembers present: Kurt Hansen, Glenda Gailliard, ZacicenT Loiselle, Dean Bra�T and Chacl
Weldon
Welcome and Call to Order
Kurt Hansen, Building Official, called the meeting to order at 4:OSp.m.
Consider approval of the minutes of May 19, 2011
Jim Strange made a motion to approve the minutes of Ma�T 19, 2011.
Seconded b�T Rosanne Ciccia. Motion carried 6-0.
Elect a chair for the Health and Building Standards Commission
Kurt requested that all members introduce themselves.
Jana�T Tielcen moved that Jim strange be the ne��� Chairman and Jeff Wa���ro be the
Vice Chairman. Seconded b�T Rosanne Ciccia.
Review the requirements for Commissioners, including: Attorney General's Open
Meetings Training, and City of Denton Handbook for Boards, Commissions, and
Council Committees
Jennifer Walters came forward and gave a brief description and overview of
each.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2009 International Fire Code as
amended by the City and make recommendation to the City Council.
Dean Bra�T (Fire Protection Engineer Associate) and Chacl Weldon (Assistant Fire
Marshall) came for��� ard. Chad gave a slide presentation and briefed the
Commissioners on the acloption of the 2009 International Fire Code.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Janay Tielcen made a motion to recommend to the City Council the
adoption of the 2009 International Fire code as amended by the City.
Seconded by Rod Reeves. Motion carrie 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2009 International Building
Code as amended by the City, 2009 International Residential Code as
amended by the City, 2009 International Plumbing Code as amended by the
City, 2009 International Mechanical Code as amended by the City, and the
2009 International Fuel Gas Code as amended by the City and make
recommendation to the City Council.
Kurt Hansen, came fon��ard and presented a slide presentation and briefed
the Commissioners on the adoption of the 2009 International Building
Code as amended b�T the Cit�T, 2009 International Residential Code as
amended b�T the Cit�T, 2009 International Plumbing Code as amended b�T the
Cit�T, 2009 International Mechanical Code as amended b�T the Cit�T, and the
2009 International Fuel Gas Code as amended b�T the Cit�T.
There was a brief question and answer session.
Rosanne Ciccia made a motion to recommend to the City Council the
adoption of the 2009 IBC, the 2009 IRC, the 2009 IPC, the 2009 IMC, and
the 2009 IFGC, as amended by the City. Seconded by Janay Tieken. Motion
carrie 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the 2011 National Electrical Code as
amended by the City and make recommendation to the City Council.
Kurt Hansen, came fon��ard and presented a slide presentation and briefed
the Commissioners on the acloption of the 2011 National Electrical Code
as amended b�T the Cit�T.
There ��� as a brief question and ans��� er session.
Jeff Wa���ro macle a motion to recommend to the Cit�T Council the acloption of the
2011 National Electrical Code ���ith the consideration to delete the requirement
to install Arc-Fault Circuit-Internipter protection for all 15 and 20 ampere
branch circuits in the rooms not protected with a Ground-Fault Circuit-
Internipter protection device of all dwelling units and maintain the current
code requirement. Seconded by Rod Reeves. Motion carried 6-0.
Hold a discussion concerning the adoption of the amendments to the 2009
International Energy Conservation Code by the City and make recommendation to
the City Council.
There ��� as a brief question and ans��� er session.
Jana�T Tielcen made a motion to recommend to the Cit�T Council the acloption the
ne��� amendments to the 2009 International Energ�T Conservation Code. Seconded
b�T Rosanne Ciccia. Motion carried 6-0
Hold a discussion about the HaBSCo meeting schedule for March 15, 2012.
The neztmeeting ���ill be held March 15, 2012.
Under Section _5_51.042 of the Texas Open Meeting Act. Hold a discussion
and set the date for future CAAB meetings. Under Section _5_51.042 of the Texas
Open Meetings Act, Under Section 551.042 of the Texas Open Meetings Act,
respond to inquiries from the City Council or the public with specific factual
information or recitation of policy, or accept a proposal to place the matter on the
agenda for an upcoming meeting AND Under Section _5_51.041_5 of the Texas Open
Meetings Act, provide reports about items of community interest regarding which
no action will be taken, to include: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or
condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; an honorary or salutary
recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen; a reminder about
an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing body; information
regarding a social, ceremonial, or community event organized or sponsored by an
entity other than the governing body that was attended or is scheduled to be
attended by a member of the governing body or an official or employee of the
municipality; or an announcement involving an imminent threat to the public
health and safety of people in the municipality that has arisen after the posting of
the agenda.
Adjourn
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 5:24 p.m.
Jim Strange,
HaBSCo Chairman
Jeff W a��� ro,
Co-Chairman
Glenda Gailliard, Permit Technician
Supervisor, Cit�T of Denton
Chamber of Commerce Questions with Staff Responses
KURT NANSEN: 2009 Building Codes—July 13, 2012
1. What other cities in North Texas have adopted the 2009 Building Code amendments?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: Out of the 23 cities which responded to my survey, 15 Cities have already adopted the 2009
Building Codes.
2. What other cities in North Texas are on a newer code; 2012, 2015?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: There are currently no cities on the 2012 Building Codes, however, 11 of these cities are
scheduled to adopt the 2012 Building Codes within the first 6 months of next year. This is probably due
to the fact that the NCTCOG amendments will not be published until the end of 2012.
3. What other cities in North Texas adopted a 10% or more increase in the energy code?
Answer: See chart below.
Note: Along with the City of Denton, only 2 other cities (Frisco and Plano) have requirements more
stringent than the 2009 Energy Code.
City Adopted the 2009 Planned Adoption Surpass the IECC Require 3rd Party
Code of 2012 Requirements Energy Inspectors
for Res & Comm
Rockwall 2-6-2012 3 years No Yes, both
Allen 5-24-2011 ? No Yes, both
Garland 1-2-2012 ? No In-house
Benbrook 12-2012 1-1-2013 No Res, no — Comm,
yes
Bedford 3-22-2011 ? No Yes, both
Frisco IECC only, 5-2012 9-2012 Energy Star only — Res, yes — Comm,
for all others considering IECC no
2009 +15%
Lancaster No ? No Yes, both
Carrollton 2-11-11 1-1-2013 No In-house
Grand Prairie 2-2011 No, 2015 No Yes, both
Celina No ? No Yes, both
Irving No, May or June No, 2015 No No, just Energy
2012 Star
Waco 1-1-2010 1-1-2013 No No, but accept
their reports
McKinney No Fall, 2012 No Yes, both
Arlington 5-24-2012 ? No In-house
Plano 1-2011 1-2013 Yes, 15% above Yes, both
Wylie No 4-2013 No Yes, both
University Park 2010 ? No In-house
Prosper No 3-2013 No Yes, both
Nurst 04-2011 No, 2015 No In-house
Coppell 1-11-12 1-2013 No
Dallas No 3-2013 No Yes, both
Colleyville 10-2012 ? No Yes, both
Southlake 4-2011 7-2013 No No, but accept
their reports
4. What is the increased effective cost of adopting the changes to the builder?
Answer: For a typical new home, an added cost of approximately $425.00
Note: As indicated on the chart below, by adopting the 2009 Building Codes along with the 2011
Electrical Code, the major additional requirements for a new home include adding a carbon monoxide
detector, adding more arc fault circuit interrupters, and also adding tamperproof receptacles.
2005 NEC or 2006 I- 2011 NEC or 2009 Approximate Cost
Code Requirement Extended Cost
Codes I-Codes Increases
Carbon monoxide No requirement Required $50 each $100.00
Detector
Arc Fault Circuit In sleeping rooms In all rooms $45 each $315.00
Interrupters only (approximately without GFCI (approximately 7
3 AFCIs) protection more AFCIs)
Tamperproof No Requirement In all 15 & 20 amp $1.25 each $12.50
Receptacles (approximately 25 wall receptacles (approximately 25
receptacles @ $0.75 receptacles at and
each) increase of $.50
each)
Total Increase $427.50
5. What is the effective cost of implementing the independent inspection outlined in 506.4.2 over
adding staff to complete the inspections?
Answer: Before I address the cost of adding staff to perform final energy inspections, I will share
my findings in regards to hiring a 3rd party energy inspection company to perform energy
inspections. The effective cost of a final energy inspection will vary from project to project
depending on the size and the energy needs of each project. Nowever, from my research with
three local 3rd party energy inspection companies, costs average approximately $0.10 per square
foot for a 5,000 Sq Ft project, or about $500.00. This cost includes the preliminary ComCheck
report and a full final inspection. Also, the cost per square foot does decreases as the project
increases in size.
Now, what would be the cost of hiring additional staff to perform commercial energy
inspections? The annual cost for a Commercial Building Inspector, plus benefits, plus a vehicle is
approximately $95,000. In the past year, the city inspectors performed approximately 270
commercial and commercial alteration energy inspections. By dividing $95,000 by 270
inspections, the average cost per energy inspection would be approximately $350.00. I could
add an additional permit fee of $350.00 on each commercial project or I could look at a price per
sq ft. The price per sq ft would be somewhere around 7 cents, and so for example, at 7 cents
per sq ft, an energy inspection on a 5,000 sq ft project would cost $350.00.
In conclusion, with the addition of a Commercial Building Inspector to my staff, my City staff
would be able to do a thorough energy inspection for each commercial or commercial alteration
project.
Note: Remember, this proposal is only for Commercial and Commercial Alteration permits. Residential
projects are required to have a duct and a house tightness test performed and the builders are already
providing this information to the inspectors.
With the current staff of inspectors and the current workload, the City has not been able to verify, as
thoroughly as possible, the final state of the compliance of these projects with the requirements of the
Energy Code. Since verifying a projects compliance with the Energy Code is not typically a life/safety
issue, my current staff does their best, with the resources available; to see that energy requirements are
met.
With each new addition of the Energy Code, the requirements are growing more stringent and more
complicated. As you can see from the first chart above, thirteen (more than half) of the twenty three
cities surveyed require verification from 3rd party energy inspections for both residential and commercial
properties; only nine of the twenty three cities surveyed perform their own energy inspections or they
accept the reports from 3rd party energy inspectors. I think that in the near future, more and more
Cities will be requiring 3rd party verification, or they will be hiring highly trained and skilled energy
inspectors to perform all their energy inspections.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 29 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF DENTON,
TEXAS, TO PR4VIDE FOR THE A.D�PTION OF THE 1NTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE,
2009 EDITI�N; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS THERETO; RE-ESTABLISHING
PERMIT FEES; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY ]N THE AMOUNT OF $2400 FOR
VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; RE�EALING ALL
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECT�VE
DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1: Chapter 29 of the Code of the City of Denton, Te�as is amended to read as
foliows:
ARTICLE I. GENERAC. PROVISIONS
Sec. 29-�.. International Fire Code--Adopted.
There is hereby adopted by the City of Denton, Texas far the purpose of prescribing
xegulations governing canditions hazardous to Iife and property from fire and explosian, those
certain Codes and Standards known as ihe International Fire Code, including Appendices A-J,
published by the International Code Council, Inc., being particularly the 2009 edition� thereaf
and whale thereof, save and except such portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified or amended
by sectio� 29-2 of this ardinance. A copy of said Fire Code is now filed in the af�ice of the City
Secretary, and is hereby adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length hexein, and from
the date on which this ordinance shall take effect, the provisxons thereof shall be con�rolling
within the limits of the City of Denton and within five thousand (5,000) feet thereof, where
specified therein.
Sec.29-2. Amendments.
The In�ernatianal Fire Code, as adopted in Section 29-1., is hereby arnended as follaws:
A. By the amendment of the International Fire Code, as follows:
**Sec�ron 101.1: amended to read as foilows:
Section 101.1 Title. These regulations shall he knowx� as the Fire Code of the
City of Denton, Texas, the "Fire Code" or, in the context o� the following
amen.dments, "this code".
**Section 101.2: second paragraph added to read as follows:
The provisions of this code sha11 supplemezat any and a11 laws relating to fire
safety and shall apply to all pexsons without restriction, �uiless specifically
exempted.
Page - 1
**Section 102.4.1: added to read as follows:
Section 1U2.4 Applicatian of other codes. The design and construction of new
structures shall conaply rvith this code, and other cades as appiicahle; and any
alterations, additions, changes in use or changes in stiuctures required hy this
code which are within the scope of this and other codes shall be made in
accordance therewith.
**Section 102.7; amended ta read as follows:
Section 102.7 Referenced codes and standards. The cades and standards re£erenced in
this code shali include those that are Iisted i� Chapter 45, and such codes and
standards shall be considered part of the requirements of this code to the
prescribed extent of each such reference. Whexe differences occur between the
provisions of this code and the referenced standards, the provisions of this code
shall apply. Whenever amen�ments have been adopted to the referenced codes
and standards, each reference ta said cade and st.�ndard sha11 be considered to
reference the amendments as well. Any reference �o NFPA 70 or the ICC
Electrzcal Code shall mean the Electrical Code as adopted.
**Section 103.1: second paragraph added to read as fallows:
Section 103.1. Under tkxe chiePs direction, the fire department is authorized to
enforce all ordinances of the jurisdiction pertaining to:
1. The prevention af fires,
2. The suppression or extinguishments of dangerous or hazardous fiz'es,
3. The storage, use and handling of hazardous materials,
4. The installation and maintenance of automatic, manual and other
private fire alarm systems and fire-extinguishing equipment,
S. The maintenance and regulation of fire escapes,
6. The maintenance of fire protection arid the elimination o� fire hazards
on land and in buildings, structures and other property, incl�ding those
under conshuction,
7. The maintenance of ineans of egress,
8. The investigation of the cause, origin and circumstances of fire and
unauthorized releases of hazardous materials, and
9. The investigation of the cause, origin and circumstances of explosions.
For authority re�ated to control and investigation of emergency scenes, see
Section � 04.
**Section 1Q3.1.2: added to read as %llows:
Page - 2
Section 103.1.2 Department oi Fire Prevention Persannei and Police. The
chief and members af the Department of �'ire Prevention shall have authority io
issue citations for violations of this code.
**Section 103.4.2: add section to read as follows:
Section 103.4.2 Liabili�y. All regulations provided in this Code are hereby
declared ta be governmental and for the benef t of the general public. Any
member of the City Council, any city official or employee, or any member of the
Health and Building Standards Commission charged with the enforcement if this
code, acting for the City in the discharge of his or her duties, are eniitled to the
�egal protectians afforded by Article VIII of Chapter 2 of the Code of the City of
Denton, Texas (§2-243 through 2-250), as amended, or as otherwise provided by
State law, if better.
**Sectio� 104.10.2: added to read as follows:
Section 104.10.2 Hazardaus Materials. The fire code official is authorized to
investigate the cause, origin, and circurns�ances of any unauthorized xeleases of
hazardous materials.
**Section 104.1.0.3: added to read as follows:
Section 104.10.3 Explosives. The fire code official is authorized to investigate
the cause, origin, and c�rcumstance� of explosions, explosives hanc�ling,
manufacturing, and usage of explosive materiais.
**Section 105.6.47: added to read as follows:
Section 105.6.47 Gas and Oil Wells. To aperate gas and oil wells in the
incorporated city limits of Denton, Texas.
**Section 106: added Sections lOb.2.3., 146.2.4, 106.2.5, and 106.2.6, to xead as
follows:
Section 106.2.3 Freqnency o�' Inspection. All owners of, occupants af, tenants
of, lessees of or pexsons making use of any building or premises, or portions
thereof, when used as nonresidential group occupancies, including hotels, lodging
houses arzd congregate residences, as defined by tk�e Building Code are required to
accornznodate annual inspections of such buildings, premises ar portions thereof
upon the reasonable and lawful demand of the �'ire Marshal or his designated
representative. Additionally, the �"ire Marshal may ini�zate such inspections at
such other times as he deems appropriate to satisfy the purposes of t�is ordinance,
and may additionally inspect alI other premises as may be necessary, including
such other potential hazards or appliances as the Fire MarshaJ znay specify, for the
purpose of ascertaining and causing to be corrected any condition which would
reasonably tend to cause a fire or contribute to its spread.
Section 105.2.4 Annual Fire Protection Systems Testing. The annual testing
of all fire sprinkler systems, f re alarm syste�,s, fire extinguishing systems, hood
Page - 3
extinguishing system�s and fire pumps shall be witnessed by the Fize Cade Official
or his designee.
Section 106.2.5 Annual Inspection Fees. The first annual inspection performed
pursuant to Section 106 of this code shall be perfonned free of charge. If the Fire
Marshal ox his designee observes a violation of this chapter and perfarms a
follow-up (re-inspectian} inspection to determine whether a violation or violations
observed during the previous inspection have been coz�'ected, a fee shall be
charged, and the occupant or lessee shall pay said fee within 30 days of being
billed therefore as condition to continue lawful occupa.ncy af the building or
dwelling ta be inspected. Said fee shail be based upan the amount of interior area
of the building Ieased, occupied or used by the person. The fee shall he in the
amaunt established, and from time ta time amended, by ordinance of City
Council, a copy that shal� be kept on file with the City Secretaty. Follow up
inspection fees for common areas of such buildings or premises shall be charged
to and paid by tl�e owner in accordance with the area inspected.
Section 106.2.6 Permit and Pexmit Fees. Any permit required by Sections 105
or 106 of the Code shall be issued anly upon payment o� a permit fee in an
amount established, and as from time to time amended, by ordinance of the City
Council, a copy of which shall be i�ept on file with the City Secretary.
**Sectian 109.3: amended ta read as follows:
Section 109.3 Vialation Penalties. Persons who violate any provision of this
code, who fail to comply with any of the req�airements thereof, or who erect,
install, alter, repair or perform wor� z� viaiation of the approved construction
documents, the directives of the fixe cade official, or the conditions of any permit
or certificate issued under provisians of this code, shall be subject to prosecution
of a misdemeanor offense punishable by a fine as specified in §1-12 oithe Code
o£ tk�e City o� Denton, Texas. Each day that a violation continues after due notice
has been served shall be deemed a separate offense.
**Section 114.4: amended to read as fallows:
Section 110.4. Abatement.
Any person operating or maintaining any occupancy, �remises ar vehicle subject
to this Code who shall permit any fire hazard to exist on the premises under his or
her control, or who shatl fail to take immediate actian to abate a fire hazard when
ordered or natified to do so by the code official ar his duly authorized
representative, shall be guilry of a separate offense for each an.d every day or
portion thereof which any violation of any of the provisions of this Code is
committec� or continued.
**Section 111.4: amended to read as foliows:
Seetion 111.4 Failure to compIy. Any perso� who shall continue any work after
having been served with a stop work order, excep# such work as that person is
directed to perform to remove a violatian or unsafe condi�taon, shal! be liable to a
Page - 4
fine of not less than two hundred ($200} dollars or more than the maximu�n fine
specifiied in §1-i2 of the Code.
**Section 202: the following definitions are added or aine�ded to read as follows:
AMBULATORY HEALTH CARE FACILITY. Buildings or portions thereof
used to provide medical, surgical, psychiatric, nursing or simiiar care on a iess
than 24-haur basis io individuals who are rendexed i�ncapable af self-preservation.
This group may include but not be limited to the following:
Dialysis centers
Sedation den#istry
Surgery centers
Colonic centers
Psychiatric centers
DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PREVENTION is th.e O�fice of the City Fire
Marshal.
FIRE CODE OFF�CIAL is the Fire Marshal or other designated authority
charged by the City Council with the duties of administratian and en%rcement of
the code, or a duly authorized representative.
FIRE DEPARTMENT is th.e City of Denton Fire Department,
FIRE WATCH. A temporary measure intended to ensure continuous and
systematic surveillance of a building or portion thereaf by ane or more qualified
individuals ar standby personne� when required by the fire code off'icial �or the
purposes of identifying and contralling fire hazards, detecting early signs of
unwanted fire, raising an alarm of fire and notifying the fire department.
HIGH-RISE BUILDING is a buiiding having floors used for human occupancy
located mare than 55 feet (16,764 mm) above the lawest level of fire department
vehicle access.
JURISDICTION is the City of Denton, Texas
SELF-SERVICE STORAGE FACILITY. Is real property designed and used
for the purpose of renting or leasing individual storage spaces to customexs for the
purpose of storing and removing personai property on a self-service basis.
STANDBY PERSONNEL. means qualified fire service personnel, approved by
the Fire Chief. When utilized, the number required shall be as dixected by the Fire
Chief. Charges for utilization shall be calculated at 1.5 times the hourly wage rate
far each individual so assigned.
**Sect�an 307.2: amended to read as foliows;
Section 307.2 Permit required. A permit shall be obtained from the fire code
official in accordance with Section 105.6 prior to kindling a fixe for :recognized
silvicultural or range or wildlife management practices, prevention or control of
Page - 5
disease or pests, or open burning or a bonfire. Application for such approval shall
only be presented by and permits issued to the owner a£ the lanc� upon which the
fire is to be kindled. Examples of state or local law, or regulaiion.s z'e�erenced
elsewhere in this section xnay include but not be limited to the following:
1. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality {TCEQ) guidelines
and/or restrictions.
2. State, County or Local temporary or permanent bans on open burning.
3. Local written policies as established by the Code Official.
**Sectio� 307.4: amenderi to read as follows, deleting exception 2:
Section 307.4 Location, The Iocation for open burning shall not be less than 30Q
feet from any structure, and provisions s�all be made to prevent the fire from
spreading to within 300 feet af any structure.
Exceptions:
1. Fires in approved cox�tainers that are not less than 15 feet from a
structure.
**Section 307.4.1: amended to read as follows:
Section 307.4.1. Banfires. A bonfre shall not be conducted within 300 feet af a
structure or corr�bustible material unless the bonfire is contained in a barbecue pit.
Co�ditions which could cause a fire to spread within 300 feet of a structure sha11
be eliminated prior to ignition.
**Section 307.4.2: amended �o read as follows:
Section 307.4.2. Recreational Fires. Recreationai fires shal.l be prohibited
within the incorporated city limits of Denton, Texas.
**Section 307.4.4: added to read as follows:
Section 307.4.4 Trench Burns. Trench burn� shall be conducted in air curtai�
trenches and in accordance with Section 307.2.
**Section 307.5: amended to read as follows:
Section 307.5 Attendance. Open burning, trench burns, bonfires, or portable
outdoor fireplaces shall be constantly attended until the fire is extinguished. A
minimurri of one portable fire extinguisher complying with Section 906 with a
minimum of 4-A rating or other approved on-site fire extinguishing equipment,
such as dirt, sand, water barrel, garden hose or water truck, shail be available for
immediate �tilizatian.
**Sectian 308.1.4: amended �o read as follows:
Section 3081.4 4pen-flame cooking devices. Charcoal burners and other open-
flame cooking devices shall not be operated on cambustible ba.Iconies ox within
10 feet {3,048 mm) of comb�astible con�truction.
Page - 6
Exceptions:
1. One- and two-family dwellings.
*�Section 308.1.6.2, Exception #3; change to read as follows:
Exceptions:
{ #1 and #2 unchanged}
3. Torches or flame-producing devices in accordance with Section
308.1.3.
{#4 unchanged}
**Section 5U3.1.1: the following sentence is appended Yo the first paragrap�:
Except far single- or two-family residences, the path of ineasurement shall be
along a minimum of a ten feet (10') wide unobstructed pathway around the
external walls of the structure.
**Section 503.1.2: amended to read as follows:
Section 503.1.2 Additional Access. The fire code officiai is authorized to require
more than one fixe apparatus access road based on the potential for impairment of
a single road hy vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic condiiions or
other factors that Could lxmit access.
The fire rnarshal is hereby authoriz�d and empowered to establish and designate
fire lanes as he deems necessaxy for the proper ingress and egress of emergency
vehicles. Any fire l�n.e designated by the Fire Marsha.l shall become effective as
of the date he so designates.
**Section 503.1.4: added to read as follows:
Section 503.1.4. Existing Fire Lanes. Any fire latae that has been established
prior to passage of the ordinance from which this article is derived and designated
by the fire rr�arshal or that has been established by a separate ordinance sha11 b� a
fire lane for all inte�ts and purpases and shall be mair�tained as required by this
cade.
**Section 503.2.4.: xmended to read as foilows:
Section 503.2.4. Turning radius. Each fire apparatus access road shall have an
inner turning radius of not less than 35 feet, and an exterior turning radius of not
Iess than 55 feet, ox shall have a desigz� approved by the fire code afficial as
functionally equivalent to this stan�ard.
**Section 503.2.9: added to read as follows:
Section 503.2.9. Fire Lane Site Plan.
(a) When fire lanes are required in accordance with the provisions nf this
article, the ovvner, builder, or developer shall subrnit a fire lane site
plan measuring eight and one half (8- 1/2) inches by eleven (11)
inches to the fire code official prior to issuance of a building permit.
Page - 7
A capy of each approved fixe lane site plan s�all be kept on file with
the fire department.
(b) Construction of the building sha11 not begin until the �'ire lane site
plan has been submitted and approved, az�d the fire lane, or a
temporary fire lane has been completed az�d approved by the fire code
official.
**Section Sd3.3: amended to read as follows:
Section 503.3 Marking. Where requixed by the fre code official, approved
striping or, when allowed by fire code official, signs, or both, or other approved
notices shall be provided for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads or
prokubit the obstr�ction thereof. Sig�s or notices and s�riping shall be maintaiz�ed
in a clean a�d legible candition at ail times and be replaced or repaired when
nece�sary to pxovide adequate visibility.
(1) Striping - Fire apparatus access roads shall be marked by painted
lines of red traffic paint six inches (6") in widtll � ta show the
boundaries o£ the lane. The words "NO P�IRKING FIRE LANE" or
"FIRE LANE NO PARKING" shall appear in four inch (4") white
letters at 20 feet intervals an the red border markings along both sides
of the fire lanes.
(2) �igns -�hall read "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" or "FIRE LANE NO
PARKING" and shall be 12" wide and 1 S" high. Signs shall be
painted on a white backgro�nd with letters and borders in red, using
not less than 2" lettering. Signs shall be permanently affixed to a
stationary post aan.d tk�e battom of the sign si�all be six �eet, six inches
(6'6"} (1.98 m) above finished grade. Signs s�all be spaced no� maxe
than fi�ty feet (50 feet} (15.2 m) apart. Signs may be installed on
permanent buildings or walls or as approved by the code official.
**Section 503.4: amended to read as %llows:
Section 503.4 Obstruction of fire apparatus access raads. Fire apparatus access
roads shall not be obstructed by persons in any masu�er, including parking,
stopping, ar standing any non-emergency vehicle, whether attended ar
unattended, in a fire lane. The minimum widths and clearances established in
Section 503.2.1 and any area marked as a fire lane as described in Section 503.3
shall be maintaaz�ed at all times. The operator of a premise shall maintain, free o:�
obstruction, a.�l fi:re lanes an his premises. Na person may mark, post or atherwise
identify a nan-fire lane private vehicular passageway as a fire Iane or in such a
manner as tends to create confusion as to whether the passageway is a fire lane.
Any unautharized vehicle found in ar on a fire lane is:
(1) Subject ta rerz�oval by the operator of the premises, with the expense
of removal and storage to be barne by tl�.e registered awner of the
vehicle;
Page - 8
{2) Subject to citation, as weil as removal, by the fire marshal or a police
officer; and
(3) Deemed to constitute prirraa facie evidence o� a violation of this
section by: (1) a �named lessee of an unattended vehicle, if
subsequenily deterz�nined to be under a lease or ren.tal agreement at the
time of the incident; (2} the registered owner o£ an unattended vehicle;
or (3) by any occupant licensed to operate the vehicle, regardless of
whether s�ch �icense is expired, suspended or revaked.
**Sectian 903.1.2: added to read as follows:
Section 903.1.2. Residential systems. Unless specifically allowed by this code
or the International Building Code, residentia� sprinkler systems installed in
accordance with NFPA 13D or NFPA 13R shall not be recognized for the
puxposes of exceptions or reductions, commonly referred to as "trade-offs",
pezmitted by other requirements of this code. In addition, residentiai spriz�kler
systems installed in accardance with NFPA 13R must include attic sprinkler
protection to be recognized for the purposes of such trade-offs permitted by other
requirements of this code.
**Sectiom 903.2: amended to read as follows:
Section 903.2. Reyuired Installations of Automat�c Fire Extinguishing
Sys#e�ns. An automatic fire extinguishing system shall be installed and
zx�aintained ir� each accu�ancy, as required by the provisians of Section 903.
**Sections 903.Z.1.1., 903.2.1.2, 903.2.1.3 and 903.2.1.4: amended to read as follows:
Section 903.2.1.1 Graup A-1. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided
thraughout a fre area containing a Group A-1 occupancy, where one of the
following conditions exists:
1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet.
2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more.
3. The fzre area is located on a floor other than a level of e�it discharge
sezving such occupancies.
4. The fire area cantains a multitheater coinplex.
Section 903.2.1.2 Group A-2. An automatic sprinlcler system shall be provided
throughout a fire a�rea containing a Group A-2 occupancy, where one of the
�ollowing conditions exists:
1. The fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet.
2. The fire area has an occupant load of 100 or more.
3. The fire area is located on a floor other than a 1eve1 of exit discharge
serving such occupancies.
Page - 9
Section 903.2.1.3 Groe�p A-3. An automatic sprink�er system shall be provided
thraughout a fire area containing a Group A-3 occupancy, where one of the
following conditions exists:
1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet.
2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more.
3. The fire a�rea is located on a floor other than a level of exit discharge
serving such occupancies.
Section 9Q3.2.1.4 G�oup A-4. An automatic sprink�er system sha11 be provided
throughout a fire area containing a Group A-� occupancy, where one of the
following conditions exists:
1. The fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet.
2. The fire area has an occupant load of 30� or more.
3. The fire area is located on a floor other �han a ievel of exzt discharge
serving such occupancies.
**Section 903.2.8.1.: added �o read as follows:
Section 903.2.8.1 Grou� R-1. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided
thraughout buildings with a Group R-1 fire area, including all combustible
concealed spaces and attic spaces.
**Sections 903.2.9.2: amended to read as folltiws:
903.2.9.2 Bulk storage of tires. Buildi.z�gs and structur�s where the area for the
s�arage of tires exceeds 10,000 cubic feet s�all be equipped ihroughout with an
autorr�atic fire sp:r:inkler systern in accordance with Sectzon 903 3.1.1.
**903.2.9.3: added to read as follows:
903.2.9.3. Self-service storage facility. An autamatic sprinkler system shatl be
installed throughout all self-service storage facilities.
**Section 903.2.10: amended to read as follows:
903.2.10. Group S-2 enclosed parking garages. An automatic sprinkler system
shall be provided throughout buildings classified as enclosed parking garages in
accordance with Section 406.4 of t�e International Building Code.
�*Sections 903.2.11.7 and 903.2.11.8 added, to read as foliows:
Section 903.2.11.7 High-Piled Coznbustible Siorage. For any building with a
clear height exceeding 12 feet, see Chapter 23 to determine if those provisions
apply.
Section 903.2.11.$ Spray Booths and Raoms. New spray booths and spraying
zooms shall be protected by an approved autornatic fire-extinguishing system.
**Section 903.2.11.9: added to read as follows:
Page - 10
Section 903.2.11.9. General.
An automatic sprinkler system shali be insialled in all new buildings of
noncombustible const�uction, {Type T& Ii) including Group R-3,
which exceed three stori.es in height or which have mare than ten
thousand (10,000) square feet of flaor area xegardless of fire area, area
separatian walls, or fire walls.
2. An autornatic sprinkler system shall be insta�led in all new buildings of
combustible constructian, (type III, N& V) xncluding Group R-3,
which exceed two stories in height or which have more than seven
thous�nd five hundred (7,500) square feet of floor area regardless of
fire area, area separation walls, ar fire walls.
The oumex{s} of any building shall be required to instali an automatic
spzinkler system at such time as the owner(s) constructs an addition or
enlargement to the building if the total square footage of such addition,
when combined with thc total square footage of ail previous additions
and enlargernents to the building, exceeds ten thousand (10,000)
square £eet af noncombustible construction (Type I& II) �otal floor
area, and when the total square footage of all such ad�itions exceeds
by more than twenty-five {25} percent o£ the original floar area
regardless of fire area, area separation walls, or fire walls.
4. The owner(s) of any building shall be required to insta�l an autannatic
sprinkier system at such time as the owner(s} constructs an addition or
enlargement to the huiidi�g x� tk�e total square �oo#age of such addition,
when combined with the total square footage af all previaus additions
and enlargements to the builc�ing, exceeds seven thousand five hundred
(7,500) square feet of combustible constr�c�ion (Type III, IV & V)
toial floor area, and when the total square footage of a�l such additions
exceeds by more ihan twenty-five (25} percent of the original floor
area regardless of fire area, area separation walls, or fixe walls.
**Sectian 903.3.1.1: amended to read as follows:
Section 903.3.i.1. NFPA 13 Sprinkler Systems. Where tkae pxovisians af this
code require a building, or portian thereof, to be equipped throughout with an
autamaiic sprinkler system, sprinklers shall be instailed thraugliout in accordance
with N.F.P.A. 13, latest edition, except as provided in Sections 903.3.X.1.1,
903.3.1.2 and 903.3.1.3.
**Sect�o� 903.3.i.1.1: amended to read as follows:
Section 903.3.1.1.1 Exempt locations. When approved by the fire code official,
autamatic sprinklers shall not be required in the fallowing rooms or areas, where
such rooms are protected with an approved fire detection system in accordance
with Sectzon 9Q7.2 that wzll respond to visible or invisible particles of
Page - 11
combustion. Sprinklers shall not be omitted from any room merely because of
damp conditions, fire-resistance-rated construction or the presence of electrical
equip�nent.
1. Any roam wk�ere the application of water, ar flame and water,
constitutes a serious life or fixe hazard.
2. Any room or space whexe sprinklers are considered undesirable
because of the nature of the contents, when appxoved by the �'ire code
official.
3. Generator and transformer raoms, under the direct control of a public
utility, separated from the remainder of the building by walls and
floor/ceiling or roa�/ceiling assemblies having a fire resistance rating
of not less than 2 hours.
4. Spaces or areas in telecamm�znicatinns buildings used e�clusively for
telecommunications equipment, a�sociated electrical power
distribution equipment, batteries and ,standby e�gines, provided those
spaces or areas are eq�pped throughout with an automatic fixe alarm
system and are separated from the remainder of the building by a wall
with a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour and a floor/ceiling
assembly with a fire-res�stance rating of not less t�an 2 hours.
**Section 903.3.1.2: amended to read as follows:
Section 903.31.2 NFPA 13R sprinkler systems. Where aliowed in buildings of
Group R, up to and including four stories in heigh�, automatic sprinkler systems
shall be installed throughout in accordance with NF�A 13R, Iatest edition, and as
further restricted by section 943.1.2, with respect to exceptions or reductions
permitted by other requirements of this code.
**Section 903.3.5: amended to read as follows:
Section 943.3.5 Water Sapplies. Water supplies for autamatic sprinkler systems
shall comply �ith this section, the standards referenced in Section 903.3.1, and
other applicable design standards and requirements. The patable water supply
shall be protected against backflow in accordance with the requirements of this
section anc� the Internatianal Plumbing Code.
Every fire protection system shall be designed with a 10 psi safety factor.
Section 903.7: amended to read as %llows:
Section 903. 7. Fire department connections. The f�re department connectian
sha11 be provided in a location approved by the fre code offcial, within 50 feet of
the fire lane and unobstructed.
**Section 903.�4; add a second paragraph after the exceptions to read as follows:
Sprinkler and standpipe system water-flow detectors �hail be provided for each
floor tap to the sprinkler system and shall cause an alarm upon detection of water
Page - 12
flaw for more than 45 seconds. All control valves in the spxinkler and standpipe
systems, except for fire departrnent hose connection valves, skiall be electrically
supervised to inrtiate a supervisory signal at the central station upon tampering.
**Sectian 905.2: amended ta read as follows:
Section 905.2 Installation standards. Standpipe systems shall be installed in
accoxdance with this sec�ion and NFPA 14, latest edition.
**Section 905.3.1.1: added to read as follows:
Section 905.3.1.1 Buiiding area. In buildings exceeding 10,000 �quare feet in
area per story, Class I automatic wet or mazaual wet standpipes shall be pravided
where any partion of the building's interior area is more than 200 feet af travel,
vertically or horizantally, as the hose lies, from the nearest point of fire
departmeni vehicle access.
Except�on: Automatic dry and semiautamatic dry standpipes are allowed as
specified in NFPA 14.
**Section 905.3.2: Exceptions 1 and 2 amended to read as follows:
1. Open-air seating spaces without enclosed spaces.
2. Class I automatic dry and semiautamatic dry standpipes or manual wet
siandpipes axe allowed in buildings where th� highest floor surface
used for h�nan accupancy is 55 feet ox less above the lowest level o�
fire departmeni vehicie access.
**Section 905.4, item #5: amended to read as follows:
5. Where the roof has a slope less than four units vertical in 12 units
horizontal (333-percent slope), each standpipe shall be provided
witli a two-way hose connection locatec� either on the roaf or at the highest
landing of stairways with stair access to the roof An additional hose
connection shall be provided at the iop of the most hydraulically remote
standpipe for testing purposes.
**Section 905.9: secand paragraph added after the exceptions to read as £ollows:
Sprinkler and standpipe system water-flow detectars shall be provided �or each
floor tap to the sprinkler system and shall cause an alarm upon detectian o�' water
flow for mare than 45 seconds. All control valves in the sprinkler and standpipe
systems e�cept for fire department hose connection valves sha�l be electricaily
supervised to initiate a supervisory signal at the central station upon tarnpering.
Page - 13
**Section 906.1, item #1: amended ta read as fallows:
Section 90b.1.
1: In Groups A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R-1, R-2, R-4, S, and U occupancies.
**Section 907.1.4: added to read as follows:
Section 907.1.4 Design� Standards. All new and replacement fire alarm systems
serving 2d or mare alarm actuating devices sha11 be addressable fire alarm
systems. Aiarm systems serving rnore �han 40 smoke detectors or more than 100
total alarm activati�g devices sha11 be analog intelligen# or addressable fire
detection systems.
**Section 907.2.1: amended to read as follows:
Section 907.2.1. Group A. A manual fire alarm system that activates �he
occupant notification system in accordance with Sectian 907.6 shall be installed
in Group A occupancies located above or below the lowest level of exit discharge
ha�ing an occupant ioad of 100 persons. Portions of Group E occupancies
occupied for assembly purposes shall be provided with a fire alarm system as
required for Group E occupa�cy.
**Section 907.2.1.1: amended ta read as follows:
Section 907.2.1.1. System initiation i� Group A Occupancies with an
occupancy load of three hundred (3U0) or more. Activation of the fire alarm in
Group A Occupancies with an occupancy load af three hundred {300) or more
shall immediately initiate a signal using an appxoved emergency voicelalarm
communications system in accardance with Sectio� 9�7.6.2.2.
Exceptian: Wkaen approved, the prerecorded announcexnent is allowed to
be manually deactivated for a pexiod of time, not to exceed three {3)
minutes, for the sole �urpose of allowing a live voice announcement from
an approved, cansta�tly approved station.
**Section 907.2.3: amended to read as follows:
Section 907.2.3 Gronp E. A manual fire alarm systern shail be instailed in Group
E educational accupancies. When automatic sprinkler systems or s�nnoke detectors
are installed, such systerns or detectors shall be connected to the building �'ire
alarm system. An approved smoke detection system shall be installed in Group E
day care occupancies.
**Section 907.2.3: exception #1 amended, and exception #1.1 added, to read as
fotlows:
1. Group E educational at�d day care occupancies with an occupan� load of less
than 50, when provided with an approved autoFnatic sprinkler system.
1 Residential In-Home day care with fewer than 12 children may use
intercannected single station detectars in all habitable rooms. (For care
Page - 14
of five or moxe children aged 2 1/2 years or younger, see Section
907.2.6.)
**Section 9U7.2.13: amended ta read as follows:
907.2,13 High-rise buildings. Buildings with floars used for human occupancy
that are located more than SS feet (16,764 mm) above the lowest level of fire
departix�ent vehicle access shall be provided with an automatic smoke detection in
accor�ance with 907.2.13.1, a fire department communicatians system in
accordance with Section 9�7.2.13.2 and an emergency voice/alarm
communications system in accordance with Section 907.6.2.2.
**Section 907.2.13: exceptions #1-6 are deleted.
**Section 907.5.2.6: add Section 907.5.2.6 to read as fallows:
Section 907.5.2.6 Type. Each manual ala�m actuating device shall be an
approved double action type.
** Section 907.7.1.1: added to read as follows:
Section 907.7.11 Installaiion. All firE alarm systems shall be installed utilizing
Class "A" wixing far all initiating and indicating (NAC) circuits. Class "A" wiring
shal l be designed to comply with NFPA 72.
**Section 907.7.3.2. amendec� to read as fol�ows:
Section 907.7.3.2 High-rise buiidings. Buildings with floors used for human
occupancy that are Iocated more than 55 feet {16 764 mm) above the Iowest levei
o� fire department vehicle access shall establish separate zones by floor for any
af the following types of alarnz-initiating devices:
1. Smake detectors
2. Sprinkler water-flaw devices
3. Man�al fire alartn boxes
4. Ot11er approved types of automatic f re detection devices or
suppression sysiems.
**Sectian 9101 Exception #2: amended to read as fallows:
2. Where areas af buildings are equipped with early suppression fast-response
(ESFR} sprinklers, automatic smoke and heat vents shall not be required in these
areas. The fire code official is authorized to require manual smoke and heat vents
in these areas.
**Section 913.4: second paragraph added to read as follows:
The fire-pump
reversal" and
circuits.
system shall also be supervised for "loss of power", "phase
"�ump running" conditions by supervisory signal on distinct
�'age - 1 S
**Section 1008.I.4.4; amended deleting criteria #4 and 5:
100$.1.4.4 Access-controlled egress daors. The entrance doars in a means of
egress in buildings with an occupancy in Group A, B, E, M, R-1 or R-2 and
ez�trance doors to tenant spaces in occupancies in Groups A, B, E, M, R-1 and R-2
are permitted to be equipped with an approved entrance and egress access control
system which shail be installed in accordance wfth atl of the following criteria:
1. A sensar shall be provided on the egress side arranged to detect an occupant
approaching the doors. The doars shall be arranged to unlock by a signal from or
loss of power to the sensor.
2. Loss of power to that part of the access conirol system which Iocl�s the doors
shall automaticaily unlock the doors.
3. The doors shall be arranged to unlock from a�nanual unlocking device located
40 inches to 48 inches {1016 mm to 1214 mm.) vertically above the floar and within
5 feet (1524 mm) of the secured doors. Ready access shall be provided to tlie manual
unlocking device and the device shall be clearly identified by a sign �hat reads
"PUSH TO EXIT." When operated, the manual unlocking device shail result in direct
interruption of power to the loc�—independent of the access control sysiem
electronics—and the doors sha11 remain unlocked for a minim�m of 30 seCOnds.
�Delete #4 and #5}
6. Ent�ance doors in buildings with an occupancy in Group A, B, E or M shall not
be secuz�ed from the egress side d�ring periods that the building is apen to the general
public.
�*Section 1022.9: amended to read as follows:
Sec#ion 1422.9 S�noke�roof enclosures and pressurized stairways. Each exit
that serves building storzes where �he floor surface is located more than 55 feet
above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access or more than 30 feet
below the level of exit discharge serving such flaar levels sha11 be a smoke proof
enclosure or pressurized stairway in accordance with Section 909.20 of the
Internatzonal Building Code.
�*Section 2203.1, item #4: amended ta read as follows;
#4 Such that a nozzle, when the hose is fially extended, will not reach within 10
feet {3,048 mm} of building openangs.
**�ection 3301.1.3: amended to read as follows:
Section 330i.1.3 Fireworks. Except as provided otherwise herein, no person
shall possess, stare, offer for sale, expase for sale, sell at retail, manufacture, use
or explode any fireworks within the city limits, or within f ve thousand feet (5,000
ft} {1,524 m} thereof.
Exceptious:
Only when approved for fireworks dispiays, storage and handling of
fireworks as permitted in Sections 3304 and 3308.
Page - 16
2. The use of freworks �ar approved display as permitted in Section
3308.
**Section 3308.5.6; amend by the addition oithe followi�g section:
Section 3308.5.6 Marking of Sheli. Each aerial shell shall have printed directly
on its outer casing the following minimum warning 1/8-inch high letters, which
con�rast to the background
WARNING
EXPLOSIVES CLASS "1.4G or 13G"
FIREWORK
DO NOT HANDLE- CALL "911"
**Section 33a8.11: added to read as follows:
Section 3308.11 Igni#ion. Aerial shells sha11 be ignited by lighting the tips of
fuses by an electrical ignition ,source, except when manual ignition is approvec€ by
tk�e Fire Marshal. Operators shall �ot place any part of their had'aes aver the throat
of the mortar.
**Section 3403.(: semtence added to read as follows:
An approved method of secondary containment shall be provided for underground
tank and piping systems.
**Section 3404.2.11.5: sentence added io read as follows:
An approved method of secor�dary cantain�nent shall be provided for wn.dergraund
tank and piping systems.
**Section 3405.3.9: added io read as follows:
Section 3406.3.9 Permit required. An operationa.t permit i� required prior to
drilli�g and operating a gas well.
**Section 3803.2.L5: sentence added to read as �vllows:
Standby personnel shall be present during demonstrations.
**Section 4603.b.1: exception #1 is deleted.
**Addition to Chapter 47 Referenced Standards
Chapter 47 Refer�nced Standards. All compliance standards or references in
the Fire Code to the reference standards of the National �are Protection
Association, Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA, shall pertain ta the 2012 edition.
SECTION 2. The fees provided for iz� Sec�ion l Ob of the code adopted by Section 1 of
this ordinance shali be as foilows:
1. Building Fire Safety Follow-Up (Re-inspection) Znspection Fees provided in
Section 106:
Page - 17
Interior Sqnare Foota�e
1 to 3,Ofl0
3,041 to 24,000
24,001 ta 1 �0,000
aver 100,000
Fee
$ 25.Q0
$ 50.00
$100.00
$100.00
If a second follow-up (re-inspection) is required because the vialation has not been
corrected, the following fees sha11 be chaxged:
1 to 3,000
3,001 to 24,000
24,001 to 10�,000
over 100,000
$ 50.00
$100.00
$200.00
$200.00
2. The fee for an operational perini� required under Section 105.6 of the �ire Code
shall be $200.00 per permit.
The fee for a construction pezmit required under Section 105.7 of the Fire Code shall
be $200.00 per permit.
�. The fee for each required permit or inspection of a gas well or its associated
infrastructure or deveiopment is $200 for each such permit or inspection authorized
or per�ormed by the fire marshal or his designee.
5. A fee af $35.00 shall be assessed for each annual inspection o� automatic
extinguishing systems (Hood Suppression Systems), automatic fre suppression
systems, and auta�natic fire alarm systems conducted pursuant ta Section 901.6.1.
6. The pern�it fee far a temporary sales or display booth in covered malls, conducted
pursuant to Section 105.6.9 of the Fire Code, shall be $35.00.
7. A permit fee of $35.00 shall be assessed for a temporary tent permit iss�zed under
Section 105.7.13 of the Fire Code,
SECTION 3. Any person who violates a provision of this ordinanCe shall be guilty of a
nnisdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Thousand Doilars ($2,0�0.00}. Each such
persan shall be deemed guilty of a separate affense far each and every day or partion thereaf
which any violation of this or�inance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any
such violations such person shall be punished within the limits above.
SECTION 4. If a�y sectian, subsection, paragraph, sentence, phrase or word in this
ordina.nce, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalic� by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of tl�e rernaining portions of this
ordinance, and City Council of the City of Den�on, Texas hereby declares it would have enacted
such remaining portions despite any such in�alidity.
Page - 18
SECTION S. The repeal of any ordinance or any portion thereof by the preceding
sections sha11 not affect or impair any act dor�e or right vested or accrued or any pxoceeding, suit
or prosecution had or commenced in any cause befare such xepeal shall take effect; but every
such act done, or right vested or accrued, or proceedings, suit or p�osecution had or co�nenced
shall remain i�n futl force and effect ta alI intents or purposes as if such ordinance or part thereaf
so repealed shall remain in force.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall become effective 14 days froFn the date of this passage,
arid the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published
twice in the Denton Record Chrorucle, the official newspaper of the Ci�y of Denton, Texas,
within ten (10) days of its passage.
FASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 2012:
ATTEST:
JENNiFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL F4RM:
ANITA BURGES�, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
z.lotdinancesU 2�sfc amendments 2.doc
MARK A. BURROUGHS, MAYOR
Pa�� - 1 �
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
AGENDA DATE: August 14, 2012
DEPARTMENT: Utility CIP
UTILITIES ACM: Howard Martin, 349-8232 ����
SUBJECT
Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding the prioritization of the
bicycle accommodation proj ects.
BACKGROUND
After the adoption of the bilce plan in Febniary, staff was directed to develop the following
priority projects to begin implementing the plan:
1. Pennsylvania Drive
2. LTNT to DCTA Train Station (Sycamore Street)
3. TWU to DCTA Train Station (Unspecified)
With the change talcing place associated with the Pennsylvania Drive Bilce Lane and discussions
concerning TWU's master planning process, staff wanted to bring forward a reprioritization of
the bike plan proj ects.
Staff is recommending the following group of projects:
1. Windsor (Old North to Bonnie Brae)
2. Sycamore (DCTA station to LTNT)
3. To Be Determined
4. Oalc & Hicicory
Discussions with County Commissioner Coleman indicate that he is willing to allow the funds
that were dedicated to Pennsylvania Drive to be reallocated to a different bicycle accommodation
project that is in his precinct (Exhibit 1). Staff has looked at other bicycle accommodation
options and a potential candidate is Windsor from east of Old North to Bonnie Brae. This
section of Windsor was identified in the Bilce Plan as a wide outside lane or a bilce lane (Exhibit
2). The section of Windsor from Old North to Locust Street is in Commissioner Coleman's
precinct. Staff will utilize the funds from Commissioner Coleman on the eastern section of the
bilce lane and will utilize city bilce plan funding for the remainder of the proj ect. We do not
anticipate having to eliminate parlcing associated with this project.
Sycamore will be signed as a bike route from the DCTA Station to Welch Street. Currently,
funding to replace the signal at Sycamore and Carroll does not exist. Bicyclists will be directed
to the Mulberry crossing at Carroll Blvd. We do not anticipate having to elinunate parlcing
associated with this project.
With regards to the TWU connection to the DCTA Train Station, staff is discussing potential
roadway modifications associated with the University's current master planning process. These
modifications would impact bicycle accommodation for TWU. Staff is recommending that we
put this project on hold until we have a better understanding of TWU's master plan for their
campus.
Staff is requesting that in the place of the TWU project that we be allowed to select some of the
projects from the bike plan that we feel can be implemented quicldy. Criteria that we will use to
select proj ects are: identified on the Bike Plan, low cost, will not conflict with other constniction
proj ects.
Oalc & Hicicory will be snidied to deternune if they can be re-designated as a commercial
collector. If these roads can be re-designated there will be one way bilce lanes on Oalc and
Hicicory. The cost of the traffic snidy for this type of re-designation is estimated in the $35,000
range. Staff will worlc with a traffic consultant to verify the cost associated with this type of
study.
OPTIONS
1. Recommend approval of the reprioritization of the bilce plan.
2. Recommend modifying the reprioritization of the bilce plan.
3. Recommend rej ecting the reprioritization of the bilce plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending the reprioritization as presented
DATE SCHEDULED FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL
The plan will be presented at the August 7, 2012 meeting.
EXHIBITS
1. County Precinct Map
2. Bilce Plan Map (website reference)
Respectfully subnutted:
� ��.�%�
Jim Coulter
Director Water Utilities
- -- :_._.- __--;° � ! v.°' Q>��'I
�' _ � � ��J ..
� Z � €'aRl88�- �. SHERARC7 Rp BLACKJACK RD W
_ ._...�! � � � S,Q '
, y z, 'A
� , b �� '�%' ' FM 8
. � � p ? F' v �' .f. , � W Sl1ERMAN� DR
{� d1 1�j�' ..: Z W ��: N � ;p ;_ -w. .
i iU, F� v �.F ~�. � b WARSCF�I,JNFi�D .,�0�} �
1RTH R�iRDSE(ry � aisa MILAM R� E .�-
__ MIL4M R� W $q ¢
_.._.. --. _ _ _. . ......._ . . [��S � l�
<zB no �
� Y iss � �i OO $dBGgrl�D ,�.,.`. ¢ E4M BOTTOM C!R � �r. . S/y,�F`Pq � �C
4
kqR
._
� GA , R RD W GANZER RD � ���
� .._____---_ �-� -- -- -�-
,, � HUGH COLEM,A�N _ �oo ' _
-�
� �
- o � -- RHOaris Ro z
f .Ul � m � �'4.f�. ... , � � -
�� i� NG dx N c���
�' ^ ap �����A ir c�i �0,�, �pRSLE� FIELL+ {�p
; . � �,P^ . � -� -- � _RTHOLD R_ � d LONG RD � . 0 4: ..-.... . , _ .' `' p,({.V4N HILL F�p
� �3'11117. _._ m Z . ���-�- ..
�: �:
R"� 5t FM 1173 rn �� w � �� +a �Ror��a �'
�:� . 't . L� . a
; � ° i � -- 1011 =88 a . �' '1 � �
; --- - � �� �'c � � +
'', �
; I �' �;,` ym ,.- _ o pao -i`--.--
i G
- j! . ..
R �� QI Op W,�U,yp5Q�$ .. �� .. . �{I� .��. .FfSHTH,4PRU E � V R
�� .__ � _. o � 100 F�s.
-i'. '
tn¢ . � �ir� �
z
z Y
g � ..�� . u1'. Lj S�� CN . BLr'1GG R� .�. � K
~ . N SC q �' � �. 1}l.V
� . � . _' ' � � 1�' .. 1C � Z. �t6'
N
�
t � ..�r � � ,� _ � 101 �
�? c3 OP:IC 57 �� � MC PIN 7,' � z MlL�S RD
-- WH� � azs�y
�',A z3 � ���-
�i � � GR
' r � - �'�, - y � .; . . . � \�' .. .
� '\RP� � R4 �e v 1 �A o J�p,4Y OAKS DRo � �
R
� A �, _
�[._F S
TOM COL � �kS� �
.. . . � ��� .- '3� N��R RD - .
'�z.-- � � � .. � � �� A , - � � J
�,m f . .. _ ..
I, q �tY , z r � . ., . . �
----� �:.':�
iO �
O V . �.' h, �'� � .K �'�... �Q-
-y �, ,
o° �' �QS�.a,wN �� } � .. 1(11 ' cOLORq� `�� �
� ; w � �owa,ht�s Ro... . _
. � ..� pyp RiVER � � . _ �. ..
M 2449 , � �
�/bT � �CKRUS PAG� R' � -
�F � \ � �"y
� �C� . �, 1 U 1 � 'f 01 � o��
w � �, 5 klA�6Y SNORES R(? 7'�
4 LL Ff`lAN RQ �`1 FR Z N
d
Z � Shady
� � ca R 3iD catauy�t+PK Shore
ALLRE� Ra �� ' ��� ... LieAj . 4,�? .
� H seos�v ctzEErc �. 1 Q2
. ,
. . .
J4HNSQNLN --.. Q ! � � � �Q1 � orrnth �Q��
q � lti
�� � :a �/l�rC3 . k m . � � �a2 �� ���:� .
Jgp' ' .. 4 � O _ �
�.Li . , . � . _ _. p . � _ _ r � FM 2 1 .o . . ..
r.
'08SflN 12ANCH R� CW+WF .RD . O'`,�. " .c � . � o�
r r-
. W — a o�v Ro . ?°g9 1021 �Ls�ke
�o�` - - � � � Uallas
� �. . � �¢� . , isso� k .. � �i1C�{Ol'}' � '��i
J R6 `� '� E HICKO H LL RiL3 . ` 0 uf ". ,r
--- � _ [3_^ _ iq ' : m C'reek S ; ` :
,�ie � - � , � � ��ORCH! y�t �N m Q
� � al �. o a '�Y
. SAM QAV1S.R� � : E HAlZROLE Rq _' � x. . � ' V � ' ' `�
�
_. _. ..._ . , . .4 _ . � = . O 0 ..., ��
� . � $7,. V . - .� �
FM 407 .E KM 407 �Q 4 �,�', 4� �
�O. .,,. �.. !
f�u�� . �RENCHTOW � . - � - . . G . . � -l7 �C�,4G,e J
ryu � REST TRL � . p �k�q ' . . � , . `r'�C�. � � �p � .
s b c.>
, �, > , .. , � Q � x�$�� a `
�
- ,� � � �: �- � � -� V�1 e � ,:o sa�
. . , ,m 4 , � - .,. � Ca ' r .z . �.
'�n an � Q i C n 4 .
1N JETER RD � Bartan�iltc � 3 � R
�����o�N . .� .._ ---_� ^_ � ,_.: �.. _ - � EXH�B�T 1
�-- .. ---� . ,.� � �. .►-.�: - �
EXHIBIT 2
The bike plan may be viewed at: http://www.cityofdenton.com/index.aspx?page=1492
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
AGENDA DATE: August 14, 2012
DEPARTMENT: Utilities
ACM: Howard Martin, 349-8232 ����'
SUBJECT
Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff an update on the consultant proposal for the
design of the Hicicory Street Grand Street proj ect that meets the pavement, sidewallcs, streetscape
and landscape criteria as envisioned in the Downtown Implementation Plan adopted by the City
Council.
BACKGROUND
The Downtown Implementation Plan (DTIP) was accepted by the City Council on August 17,
2010 by Resolution. The DTIP study conducted by the consultant (Jacobs) identified
improvements to the streets in the DTIl' area. In addition the Jacobs study identified Hicicory
Street as the focal point of the DTII' area as it connected the A-Train station with the Denton
downtown and would accommodate Transit Oriented Development. As such Hicicory Street was
programmed to become the "Grand Street" for the downtown.
Also, during the process of creating "A Vision for Denton -- The 215t Cent�iry," E. Hicicory
Street was identified as the "Hicicory Street Arts Corridor." For years, city staff attempted to
find funding to improve the wallcability of E. Hicicory Street; several federal grants were
subnutted and denied. The sidewallcs along E. Hicicory have continued to be an issue, with
uneven surfaces, cracics and brealcs, which create tripping hazards. A-Train riders arriving in
Denton do not have easy, safe pedestrian accessibility to the Square.
In a 2005 election, the citizens approved bonds for improving downtown streets. Funds were
identified to improve the muse streets Pecan, Walnut and Austin. Cedar Street was improved in
2010, using Community Development Blocic Grant Funds.
In 2011, it was deternuned that the funds for Walnut and Austin would be better used on the East
Hicicory Street corridor; these funds were reallocated through the CIP Oversight Committee.
With this reallocation currently there is $1,777,970 in the established funding for the Hicicory
Street Grand Street (Grand Street) project. Staff is worlcing on presenting an agenda item to the
CIP Oversight Committee on August 15 to allocate about $950,000 from the Pecan Street project
to the Grand Street proj ect.
The Grand Street proj ect includes the stretch of Hicicory Street from the Downtown A-Train
Station to Locust Street (Exhibit 1). The Grand Street project will include new pavement
constniction, widen sidewallcs, improve wallcability, bring the sidewallcs up to ADA standards,
will have ornate streetscape and landscape which will include street trees, landscaped corner
beds and flower pots at various intersections, benches, trash cans, pedestrian lighting, and power
supply accommodation for future growth and downtown festivals. An irrigation system will be
installed for the landscape sustenance. The water, wastewater, and DME improvements will be
completed before pavement constniction begins for the Grand Street. The utility departments
will fund their respective utility improvements. In addition the parlcing lot located across the
Wells Fargo Banlc will be redesigned.
Staff has engaged Michael Baker (Baker) a local Denton multi-discipline engineering firm for
the design of the Grand Street project. Balcer is a company with countrywide presence, and is
engaged substantially in transportation and street design projects as part of its consulting
practice. Balcer has brought the Dallas based Landscape design firm of Caye Coolc & Associates
(CCA) in the design team. CCA has designed several transit oriented projects in the DFW
Metroplex and specialize in streetscape pedestrian paving, planting and amenities design,
roadway landscape planning and design.
Staff worlced with Balcer to establish a pre-design cost estimate for the Grand Street project. Bid
values from city street projects were used to develop this estimate. The pre-design constniction
cost estimate is about 2.8 million dollars which is shown below:
- Existing facilities demolition, new pavement, sidewallcs, drainage
- Streetscape & Landscape
- Street Lighting
- Railroad Crossings
- Contingency @ 20%
- Inspection Fees 3.5% , Testing 1.5%, TDLR
Total Pre-Design Construction Cost Estimate
The design fees for the Balcer team are estimated as below:
- Design
- Streetscape/Landscape
- Railroad Design and Permit
- Survey and SLTE
- Geotech
- Parlcing Lot
- Meetings (non-Design-related)
Total Design Fee
$168,957
$ 64,730
$ 15,874
$ 54,696
$ 9,923
$ 11,705
$ 9,886
$335,771
6.4%
2.4%
0.6%
2.1%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
12.7%
$1,601,054
$ 408,935
$ 139,250
$ 53,760
$ 440,600
$ 133,680
$2,777,280
The total pre-bid project cost including design and constniction is thus estimated at about 3.1
million dollars. During the design phase, Baker will conduct stakeholder meetings to get input on
driveway locations/closings, present the Grand Street project details, and constniction scheduling
to reduce impact on businesses and traffic. Staff and Baker will present to the City Council and
other Boards and Comnussions project details during the concept plan and as the project moves
towards final design.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is seelcing a recommendation to continue with the project as presented and bring the
Michael Balcer engineering services design contract for approval in the following meeting.
PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions)
None
ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROJECT
The design of the Grand Street project will be completed in 8 months after issuance of the
purchase order.
FISCAL INFORMATION
$1,777,970 is currently in the budget for the Grand Street project. $950,000 will be allocated
from the Pecan Street proj ect to the Grand Street proj ect after approval from CIP Oversight
Committee and the City Council. Out of the remaining approximately $372,000, $212,000 is
currently available from the DCTA rail platform proceeds, and the remaining will be funded
from conveyance of the remaining COD property interest of the Transit Center to DCTA.
EXHIBITS
L Map
Respectfully submitted,
�%��
P. S. Arora, P.E.
DRC Engineering Administrator
AGENDA DATE:
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
August 14, 2012
DEPARTMENT: Finance
ACM:
SUBJECT
Jon Fortune �
Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding the 2012-13 Proposed
Budget, Capital Improvement Program and Five-Year Financial Forecast.
BACKGROUND
The FY 2012-13 City Manager's Proposed Budget was submitted to the Council on July 27.
Staff provided the City Council with a comprehensive overview of the proposed budget at a
Budget Worlc Session on Augtist 2, 2012. In addition, the City Council also discussed the
proposed budget on August 7, 2012. The purpose of this agenda item is to provide the City
Council with an additional opportunity for questions and dialogtie.
During the above mentioned meetings, the City Council aslced a number of questions and
requested a variety of information concerning the budget proposal. In response to the questions,
staff has prepared the attached memorandum (Exhibit 1) that summarizes the questions we
received and the answers that we have been able to compile.
Below is the schedule we will follow to adopt the budget and tax rate:
Augtist 21 Worlc Session on the Proposed Budget
Public Hearing on Proposed Budget
lst Public Hearing on Tax Rate (if necessary)
Augtist 28
Worlc Session on the Proposed Budget
2"a Public Hearing on Tax Rate (if necessary)
September 11 City Council Adopts Budget and Tax Rate
Agenda Information Sheet
August 14, 2012
Page 2
I loolc forward to discussing the budget materials in detail with you. If you have any questions,
or need additional information, please let me lcnow.
EXHIBIT
Question and Answer Memorandum
Respectfully Submitted By:
� �" „��-
��� �"� .
Bryan Langley
CFO and Director of Strategic Services
`���� �r ���iiiiiiiiiiii��i�iii�i��i��o�ii���������lllllll�lllll� Illllllllllll���iiiii�
�� � � ��� Finance De�arimeni � 21 � E. 3lcliinner � Denion. 71 76201
(940) 3498224 � DFW�lieiro (972) 434-22�9 � Fc�t (940) 349-7206
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
August 14, 2012
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Bryan Langley, CFO and Director of Strategic Services
City Council Budget Worlcshop Questions and Responses
��
Information regarding the FY 2012-13 Proposed Budget and Five Year Forecast was presented
to the City Council on August 2. Below is a summary of the questions that I have received and
the answers that we have been able to compile. For the items that require further research, we
will provide additional information at a future City Council meeting.
1. Provide the annual percentage change in the net sales tax and gross sales tax
collections.
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2011-12
YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTLTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE
% Increase or
(DeCrease) 3.9% (4.7%) 0.3% 8.8% 2.5% 12.2%
Less Incenti��es ($5��,097) ($48�,023) ($530,220) ($5�9,810) ($963,676) ($8�9,260)
NET Tatal $21,4��,��i� �24�,4(i6,7C�3 �2�,484,953 $22,321,471 $22,482,��2 �24,��6,1�4 '
% Increase or
(DeCrease) 3.8% (4.5%) 01% 9.0% 0.7% 111%
2. On slide 13 of the August budget presentation, please provide a summary of the
personal and real property appraised values shown for both the commercial and
industrial categories.
Tax Commercial
Year Real Pro ert Value Personal Pro ert Value
2010 $1,285,871,446 $468,971,222
2011 $1,360,085,727 $467,692,068
2012 $1,431,725,240 $512,854,895
Question and Answer Memorandum
August 14, 2012
Page 2 of 12
Tax Industrial
Year Real Pro ert Value Personal Pro ert Value
2010 $106,945,733 $280,921,709
2011 $89,618,067 $246,571,627
2012 $88,309,153 $371,826,553
3. Provide a list of all administrative transfers for all funds (not just general fund) and
the purpose of the transfers.
This information will be provided at the August 21 City Council meeting.
4. In looking at turnover, do we know how much of it is due to retirements? Also, do
we know how many people have reported that they were leaving for pay?
A chart of the t�irnover, with a brealcout of retirements, is included below.
12. q fi'�6
14.Oa"'�i
8.Ofl'"fi
G.tMO"t6
�.00'7f-,
2.�09i�
fr.4��!���
FY(rt�.<d7 FY47J�� FY08ID� FY'CM�J1U
Total 7 p.']']% 9.47°fo 5.15% 6.65°fo
Tui nr�►� c �°
l��tii°einent w�ei•�i�� �11 �tlre�° Tei°inin�licMU�
F�° u�: o- Ttr�•�a��r F�° ii i� ��
(es c lxxcle s t,ein�� oi �i��!s r� soii� l}
FY10f71 FY�1/1'���ro�j
7.18°fo 9 18%
The total turnover numbers vary slightly from what was presented to City Council on
August 2, 2012. There are two reasons for this. The first reason is based on payroll
timelines. Some ternunations may not appear in time for the reporting period. The second
reason is related to a reporting error which excluded ternunated employees.
Question and Answer Memorandum
August 14, 2012
Page 3 of 12
We are also providing the below chart to break out Police and Fire civil service and non-
civil service turnover. We have historically reported total turnover for the City for all
regular employees (excluding temporary and seasonal employees). We lcnow that
turnover in our Police and Fire Civil Service positions is low and is typically due to
retirements, so including them in the total turnover may deflate the turnover we are
experiencing in the rest of the City. When excluding civil service employees, the turnover
is higher.
Turnover
Non-Civil Service versus Civil Service
FY 06/07 Tluough FY 11/12 Q3
(escludes temporaiv,!seasonal)
A question was raised by Council as to whether we lcnew how many people were
reporting they were leaving for better pay. Our exit interviews do not capture specific
information about pay, only that they are leaving for a"better position."
5. If other cities haven't been granting much of an increase over the past few years,
how is it that we have slipped with our market comparisons?
The City's current compensation philosophy is to ensure that wages/salaries are
competitive when compared with the appropriate external labor marlcet. To that end, we
survey organizations with whom we compete for labor to deternune the average pay for
similar positions in our organizations ("marlcet"). The goal is to ensure our pay plan
"midpoint" is reflective of the marlcet.
We conducted a wage/salary survey in 2007 to ensure our ranges were competitive and
have done subsequent analysis through TML survey data in other years. We have already
done a prelinunary assessment of our pay ranges for FY 2012-13; however, we are in the
process of conducting another wage/salary survey. We should have the results bacic in
October of 2012.
Question and Answer Memorandum
August 14, 2012
Page 4 of 12
The compensation philosophy was used as the basis for considering compensation
language in our Police and Fire meet and confer agreements. Specifically, our language
reads:
It is the desi�e of the City to �ecognize thcct the employees of the City of Denton
Police/Fi�e Depcc�tment pe�fo�m thei� �esponsibilities cct cc level thcct is ccbove the typicccl
met�oplex Police/Fi�e ccgency. As such, it is the desi�e of the City to maintccin cc pccy
philosophy thcct exceeds the ccve�ccge met�oplex pccy [ma�ket ccve�ccgeJ fo� police
office�s/fi�efighte�s.
With that goal, we agreed to pay five percent (5%) above the average marlcet rate of 12
comparator cities to guide the decision for pay increases. We have achieved and
maintained our compensation goal in the public safety area. In fact, the 3% increase
proposed in the FY 2012-13 Budget will exceed the "market + 5% goal" for several of
the civil service positions.
For the non-civil service employees, increases are primarily given for "merit." The merit
increase matrix was designed to reward employees below the marlcet average a higher
percent increase than those above the marlcet average. Due to a lacic of funding, we have
lost ground on trying to pay employees the market average rate for their position.
The current issue discussed at the August 2, 2012, Budget Worlcshop, was that
approximately 58% of our non-civil service employees as of July 12, 2012, are being paid
below the marlcet average of our existing pay plan. Since these are our published ranges,
employees expect that they can obtain at least the market average rate in a reasonable
amount of time.
Ensuring our midpoint is tnily competitive with our labor marlcet is important. Equally
important is ensuring we are compensating our employees fairly based on their
experience and performance. Because we strive to hire and retain quality staff, we believe
it necessary, and appropriate, to compensate employees at the market average when
compared with other employees possessing sinular slcills and qualifications in the labor
marlcet. If not hired in at the marlcet average, employees should be able to have their
salaries increased to the market average in three to seven years, contingent on
performance.
The equity adjustments being considered for FY 2012-13 will provide for up to a one
percent (1%) increase for employees below marlcet average who have been in their
position less than five years and up to a two percent (2%) increase for employees below
marlcet average who have been in their position five years or longer, assunung acceptable
performance. However, no equity adjustment will exceed the market average as specified
on the pay plan. These adjustments will not necessarily ensure all employees are paid the
marlcet average; however, it is a starting place for us to help begin malcing some
movements in the right direction.
Question and Answer Memorandum
August 14, 2012
Page5of12
6. Provide information on which entities are included in our market comparisons for
the purposes of calculating the market average for our pay plans.
When conducting our salary survey, we focus on lcey "benchmarlc" positions. Benchmarlc
positions are those positions that are common across most organizations. We also try to
obtain data from those organizations that we compete with for labor (our "marlcet"). We
have focused on more of the cities within the DFW metroplex area for most of our
positions.
For Police and Fire Civil Service employees, the meet and confer agreements govern the
12 cities we include in our salary survey. These cities include:
Arlington
Carrollton
Dallas
Fort Worth
Frisco
Garland
Irving
Lewisville
McKinney
Mesquite
Plano
Richardson
We use these same cities when we conduct our salary survey for non-civil service
positions. Because we are such a diverse organization, we have also included other cities,
public organizations, and private organizations in our survey. This will allow us to assess
our pay practices as they compare to all of the various labor markets and industries from
which we recniit employees. These organizations are listed below.
TWU
UNT
Denton County
DISD
City of College Station
City of Bryan
City of Grand Prairie
IESI TX Corp
Denton Regional Medical Center
Josten's
North Texas Municipal Water District
Tarrant Regional Water District
Question and Answer Memorandum
August 14, 2012
Page 6 of 12
Tetra Palc Materials LP
Trinity River Authority
United Copper
Upper Trinity Regional Water District
Waste Management of Texas
BCI Mechanical
CB S Mechanical
FEMA — Texas National Processing Center
Flowers Balcing Company
Talem Labs
Ana-Lab
Coserv
Oncor
Texas Municipal Power Association
Brazos
Texas New Mexico Power of Lewisville
7. Provide a summary of developer contributions which will be used to help fund the
proposed new signals.
The supplemental pacicages for traffic signals would address signalization needs at six
intersections. The intersections and funding sources are identified below:
Intersection
Biinker & Colorado
Biinker & Spencer
Allegra Vista & Dallas Dr.
State School Road & Uiucoin Lake
Counri�� Club & Hickoiti� Creek
Counri�� Club & Rti�an Road
Cin� of Denton De��eloper Aid in
Conriiburion Consriucrion Total
$16�,077
$273,730
$273,232
$9�,01�
$130,000
$130,000
$118,332
$6,270
$9,792
$��,382
$282,�09
$280,000
$283,02�
$1�9,396
$130,000
$130,000
The first three intersections are permanent installations. The final three proj ects are
temporary installations that will be replaced with a permanent signal when the roadway is
widened.
8. Provide detail on actual bike plan expenditures for this year.
The bike plan was approved by Council in Febniary 2012. Once the Interlocal
Agreement was completed with Denton County, staff began worlcing on bicycle
accommodation for Pennsylvania Drive. Staff held two public meetings associated with
this project and developed numerous options for consideration. Total expendinires to
Question and Answer Memorandum
August 14, 2012
Page 7 of 12
date associated with Pennsylvania Drive are $6,167. Staff is developing bicycle
accommodation plans for Sycamore Street, and expenditures to date on this project are
$3,176. The FY 2011-12 bilce plan implementation budget is $100,000.
9. What is the staffing needed to properly implement the bike plan?
Staff will provide detailed information on the bike plan as a separate work session item
on August 14.
10. How have the neighborhood incentive grant funds been used on an annual basis?
This information will be provided at the August 21 City Council meeting.
1L How many neighborhood incentive grant projects were staff initiated versus
neighborhood initiated?
This information will be provided at the August 21 City Council meeting.
12. What is the decision process for making neighborhood incentive grants? Who
makes the decision? We need a formal protocol.
This information will be provided at the August 21 City Council meeting.
13. Can we use the Geographic Information System to demonstrate the appraised value
growth? This will helps us geographically identify growth hot spots.
The Geographic Information System (GIS) can be used to create a map showing "hot
spots" where appraised value has changed significantly with respect to the surrounding
parcels.
Staff will provide an informal staff report to Council with this analysis combining
information from the GIS system and the Denton Central Appraisal District.
14. We need to make Geographic Information System data open for public use.
The City Departments collect and maintain Geographic Information System (GIS) data
through the course of normal business operations. Much of the GIS data collected by the
City is available for review on the City's website at http://maps.citvofdenton.com
15. What do we proactively do to use free or low cost interns to help meet staffing needs
at the senior center?
We have Senior Center internship information at the University of North Texas and
Texas Woman's University in the following departments: Gerontology, Sociology, Social
Question and Answer Memorandum
August 14, 2012
Page8of12
Worlc, Counseling, Parlcs and Recreation and Psychology. Interns, depending on the
department, are required to spend anywhere from 200-400 hours with an agency. In that
time, they must complete their schools assignments as well as our assignments. After
interviewing an intern, we work with them to get them acclimated to our department and
participants. They assist with program delivery, flyer and newsletter production, and must
complete a special project for the center (special event, activity or program). The Senior
Center has had two interns in the last two years. Interns choose the agency they intern at
based on their career interest and have many options available to them. As a department
we have also had interns in Marlceting and Athletics.
16. How is the vehicle requested related to replacing the tree spade?
This information will be provided at the August 21 City Council meeting.
17. Do we have a sense of how many downtown projects would not have occurred if it
were not for the downtown incentive grant?
There are two examples that we are aware of:
The first example is a restaurant. The existing stnicture was not utilized as a restaurant
previously. As such, the tenant had not planned on the impact fees and his budget was
already stretched. The business owner faced the choice of remaining at his old location
(South of downtown) in an inferior building. The grant allowed him to relocate and
increase his business significantly.
The second example is of a retail building owner on the square wanting to change the
fa�ade of the building. Proj ect costs were approximately $16,000 and the owner
requested $8,000 from the grant. A grant of $2,000 was recommended by the taslc force.
It was determined by the taslc force that the proj ect was worthy for consideration, but
would not significantly increase traffic in the area, increase sales tax, or add to the tax
rolls in order to qualify to receive the full request. Unfortunately, the grant amount
offered was not enough for the owner to complete the project.
In addition, three different people subnutted applications to renovate 207 N. Elm Street.
The first two were not able to make the project work. They had each been awarded
$20,000. The third applicant received a$10,000 grant but had enough funding to
complete the proj ect.
18. Provide a list of downtown incentive grant applications and the reasons for
approval or denial.
Please see Attachment 1.
Question and Answer Memorandum
August 14, 2012
Page 9 of 12
19. Please provide feedback to the Economic Development Partnership Board (EDPB)
that Council would like guidance regarding whether downtown grants should go to
new types of projects. Also, the EDPB should be asked if more focus on the
infrastructure needs of the downtown is needed.
Staff will be in communication with the EDPB on this issue and will provide the City
Council with feedbacic.
20. What current Capital Improvement Projects (CIl') and CIP needs do we know
about in the downtown area?
At this time Denton Municipal Electric (DME) has a"place holder" for project(s) in the
downtown area in our CIP. When DME started preparing the FY 2012-13 Budget in
January of this year, we had seen only prelinunary information on some type of
development or re-development that may occur as part of the Downtown Improvement
Project (DTIP), but we had not seen any specific plans or scope, in order to develop a
detailed budget amount or engineered design. In the last several weeks, DME has been
involved with both Planning and City Engineering staff, which is now providing insight
into the possible magnitude of the amount of work involved. We are just beginning to
see that the Hicicory Grand Street proj ect may involve a significant amount of worlc by
DME. Once street plans and layouts are developed and delivered to DME by the City's
outside design firm, we will be able to develop actual preliminary designs and budgetary
amounts to include in future budget years. Additionally, significant drainage proj ects
have been identified for the downtown area, but no funding has been identified at the
present time. The next voter approved bond election in FY 2014-15 or FY 2015-16 could
be considered for these projects.
The 8-inch Water line from Locust Street to Bell Avenue will be replaced by a 12-inch
line. The planning level estimated cost is $155,000.
The 8-inch Wastewater line from east of Austin Street to Industrial Street will be replaced
by a new 8-inch line and the 10-inch line from Industrial to Bell Avenue will be replaced
with a 12-inch line. The planning level estimated cost is $106,000.
21. Provide a clear financial picture of the full cost and revenues associated with the gas
well inspections program to make sure we are fully recovering the cost of the
program.
This information will be provided at the August 21 City Council meeting.
22. Does the funding provided for "no parking" paint markings near UNT include the
West Oak neighborhood?
The money set aside for `no parlcing' painting will primarily be used in the West Oalc
neighborhood.
Question and Answer Memorandum
August 14, 2012
Page 10 of 12
23. Related to utility projects, what is the plan for revenue funded capital replacement
projects? How are we handling the cash funding of such projects? What are our
goals?
DME has programmed in our Budget to revenue fund $2.5 million of CIP through 2019.
The DME plans for annual revenue funding of the capital replacement program are
detailed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for fiscal years 2013 -
2017. Starting in 2020, DME plans to increase revenue funding of replacement capital to
$6 million. From 2013 to 2016 DME is revenue funding approximately $22 million for
remote meter reading (this project will be completed in 2016) and $300,000 for vehicle
replacement and capital tools and equipment. In 2017, DME is revenue funding
approximately $2.1 nullion of new residential and commercial development and
$400,000 in vehicle replacement and capital tools and equipment.
The cash funding of these projects is being funded with that current year's revenues.
DME's goal is to increase revenue funded projects in the funire. However, until the
Texas Municipal Power Agency (TMPA) debt is paid off, DME cannot afford to revenue
fund more than $2.5 Million annually.
The Water and Wastewater plans for the revenue funded capital replacement program are
detailed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). In the CIP, each
replacement project provides specific details, including the source(s) of funding. The
budget for each revenue funded replacement proj ect is included in the appropriate
operating budget.
The goal for revenue funding of replacement assets is based on Financial Strategies
which state in part: "The �eplacenient of existing assets sho�zld be financed fi°oni cu��ent
��eveyllres to the g��eatest exteylt posszble. The ta�get level of c1r����eylt ��eveyllre
/Ylfl'C/S/1'1!C/1!1'E', 1'E',�%C/CE',1�2E',YI/ f1lYl�/Yl�' S�/O1!%L� hE', �'E',YlE',1'C/%%y hC/SE',L� OYI /�/E', C/YIYI1lC/% L�E',�1'E',CdC//d()YI
expense, adjusted fo� niajo� assets �eplaced at long inte�vals and too expensive to fsnd
with cu��ent �evenues. Analysis should also include the cu��ent ve�sus o�iginal asset cost
to account fo� the effects of inf7ation."
In the past, some replacement assets were funded through debt financing. Another
benefit of increasing the revenue funding of replacement assets is a reduction in the
amount of new bond debt issuance.
The current calculated target level of revenue funded capital replacement program for
Water is approximately $5 nullion and $4.9 million for Wastewater. The revenue funded
capital replacement program will be incrementally increased each year in order to reach
the target by FY 2015-16.
The Solid Waste Fund is not using revenue for funding capital constniction projects. Our
commercial container replacement program is based on using a portion of our revenue to
Question and Answer Memorandum
August 14, 2012
Pagellofl2
fund $370,000 of this year's (FY 2012) new commercial containers, compactors, and
related equipment purchases. The FY 2012 budgeted revenue expense amount is
$276,000 for new contractors. We expect an increase in this class of purchases to support
commercial sector proj ected growth and overall community growth. Our revenue funding
goals are twofold, to fund all light duty vehicles and all refuse and recycling containers
using revenue funds.
In general, the major Solid Waste capital expenditures relate to the periodic landfill cell
constniction and the acquisition of vehicle and equipment assets. These assets are funded
through bond sales with a payment schedule equal to the life of the asset. A separate
vehicle replacement fund is also maintained to pay for smaller vehicles and equipment.
24. Provide a detailed justification for utility and solid waste rate increases.
There is no base rate increase planned for DME in the FY 2012-13 Proposed Budget.
The major driver for the rate increases in Water and Wastewater are capital costs,
primarily for increases in the revenue funded capital replacement program. In Water,
83% of the budget increase from FY 2012 to FY 2013 is due to capital costs. In
Wastewater, 60% of the budget increase is due to capital costs. The remainder of the
budget increase was due to transfers to other funds, new positions and pay increases,
increases in fuel and vehicle maintenance and other miscellaneous increases.
Solid waste and recycling services costs follow those of the national transportation
industry. We are incurring increases related to:
• The rise in fuel costs affecting the budget by an additional $450,000 over last
year;
• Increased parts costs and increases in equipment and vehicle repair and
maintenance costs of an additional $695,000 over last year;
• Debt service increases for debt issued last year for the pernutting and expansion
of the landfill, vehicles and cart purchases and other scheduled constniction for
an additional $650,000;
• Transfers increased an additional $200,000 over last year; and
• The expansion of Collection and Demolition (C&D) and Home Chemical
recycling, the additional personnel costs for merit raises, and the staffing to
support business growth have increased personnel services an additional
$207,000 for a total of $2,200,000.
25. Provide utility rate comparisons/benchmarks of our rates compared to other cities
in the area.
Please see attachments 2, 3, and 4. Rate information presented for other cities reflect
rates currently in effect, and do not reflect any proposed rate increases for FY 2012-13.
Question and Answer Memorandum
August 14, 2012
Page12of12
26. What are the staff and ancillary issues associated with restoring the Council
contingency funds?
This information will be provided at the August 21 City Council meeting.
Attachments:
1. Downtown Incentive Grant applications
2. Electric Rate comparison
3. Water and Wastewater Rate comparison
4. Solid Waste Rate comparison
DOWNTOWN REINVESTMENT GRANT PROGRAM
Amount Amount
Applicant Address Project Amount Requested Granted Building Description Work Performed
2007-08 Elk River 118 E. McKinney $ 120,844 $ 50,000 $ 10,000 McKinney & Austin Facade, signage, awnings
Industrial &
DSC Townhomes Mulberry $ 1,200,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Industrial Street Townhomes New construction
Ken Tippie 107 W. Hickory $ 4,720 $ 2,360 $ 2,360 Chestnut Tree Tea Room Awning
ARG E. Hickory
Partners 210-214 E. Hickory $ 49,850 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Hickory & Industrial Fa�ade, paint, awnings
Cahru Prasad 207 N. Elm $ 265,000 $ 50,000 $0.00 Old Schmitz Building *granted $20,000, purchase didn't happen
Joe Holland 1700 N. Elm $ 70,000 $ 35,000 $0.00 Denton Bike Center Denied/Economic impact not sufficient
Elk River 117 E. Oak $ 108,000 $ 50,000 $0.00 Five Star Supply Denied/Improvements not significant
Totals $ 1,818,414 $ 227,360 $ 52,360 (Additional funds were found this year for projects)
2008-09 Brandon Martino 221 E. Hickory $ 241,000 $ 50,000 $15,000.00 Hickory Street Lofts New construction, utility upgrades
Virginia Hamilton 109 N. Elm $ 71,400 $ 35,700 $10,000.00 UNT on the Square Exterior wall reconstructed after fire
Chi Dao 102 N. Locust $ 900,000 $ 50,000 $25,000.00 Former Gamble Insurance Bld Fa�ade, impact fees, utility upgrades
Joe Holland 1700 N. Elm $ 70,000 $ 35,000 $0.00 Denton Bike Center Denied/Lack of economic impact
Totals $ 1,282,400 $ 170,700 $50,000.00
Denton Comm.
2009-10 Theatre 314 E. Hickory $158,000.00 $36,475.00 $8,000.00 Black Box Theatre/DRC Fa�ade work, sign
K
Boonumpaichaiyakul 221 E. Hickory $140,000.00 $50,000.00 $5,000.00 Andaman Thai Restaurant Impact fees
*granted $20,000, project needed more
Brian Tackett 207 N. Elm $158,400.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 Old Schmitz Building capital
Cynthia Savino 208 W. Oak $31,000.00 $15,418.00 $0.00 Hydrant Cafe/now Square Donuts *granted $7935, project did not happen
Totals $487,400.00 $151,893.00 $13,000.00 ($27, 935 granted, not used in FY 2010-11)
2010-11 BS Love #3 113 E. Hickory $750,000.00 $50,000.00 $10,000.00 Love Shack Burgers Utility upgrades, fa�ade, impact fees
Suda Bhagwat 603 N. Locust $1,200,000.00 $50,000.00 $7,000.00 Congress Center Awnings, impact fees
New construction/impact fees/utility
Becky & Vince King 315 S. Locust $1,500,000.00 $50,000.00 $15,000.00 S. Locust Apartments upgrades
DOWNTOWN REINVESTMENT GRANT PROGRAM
Amount Amount
Applicant Address Project Amount Requested Granted Building Description Work Performed
Campus Barbers in Hickory St.
Vibe Investments 311 E. Hickory $13,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 Lofts Impact fees
Brandon Martino 217 E. Hickory $1,025,000.00 $50,000.00 $15,000.00 Building owner/Warehouse Impact fees/utility upgrades/fa�ade
Ed Canada 207 N. Elm $ 300,000 $ 50,000 $ 10,000 Old Schmitz Building Impact fees/utility upgrades/fa�ade
Denton Dough
Company 217 E. Hickory $ 900,000 $ 8,216 $ 7,235 Mellow Mushroom/Bus. owner Awnings and signage
John Cartwright 111 N. Elm $ 40,000 $ 5,704 $ 5,700 Cartwright's Ranch House Fa�ade, awning
Totals $5,728,000.00 $270,420.00 $76,435.00 (Includes $27,935 rolled over from previous year/grants awarded)
2011-12 Joe Northern 207 N. Bell $70,000.00 $27,275.00 $5,000.00 Building owner/Hoochie's Impact fees/utility upgrades/fa�ade
Sam Sauls 207 N. Bell $3,099.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Hoochie's Oyster Bar ADA ramp, signs
Facades, utility upgrades, impact fees,
JDFIU Texas Bld LLC 100 W. Oak $2,700,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Texas Building awnings
Old Denton Facades, utility upgrades, impact fees,
Warehouse LP 421 E. Oak $3,500,000.00 $25,000.00 $10,000.00 Monroe-Pearson Warehouse awnings
Valeree Clegg 107 W. Hickory $17,000.00 $8,500.00 $2,000.00 Chestnut Tree Tea Room Windows, fa�ade, move front wall out
Totals $6,290,099.00 $87,275.00 $43,500.00 (Maximum grant amount reduced to $25,000)
Brilliant Energy Brilliant Lowe Price 12
Brilliant Energy Brill'rant Low Price 6
Amigo Energy Esrent'ra
VEP 12 Month Fixi
Southwert Power & Light 12 Month
Southwert Power & Light 6 Spirit of l
TriEa�
VEP 6 Month Fixetl Rate i
VEP 12MOnth Operations U50 Si
Southwert Power & Light 3 Spirit of l
Southwert Power & Light 6 Month
Potentia Powei
Teras PowerTeras 6 Mon
VEP 3 Month Fixetl Rate i
VEP 6 Month Opeations U50 Si
Veter
Brilliant Energy Brill'rant Low Price 24
Southwert Power & Light 3 Month
Teras Power Teras 12 Mon
Southwert Power & Light 24 Spirit c
Southwert Power & Light 18 Spirit c
Vetean I
Bounce Energy Fa
Amigo Energy Onlii
Cino C
VEP 18 Month Fixi
Bounw
Southwert Power & Light 9 Spirit of l
Champion Energy ServicE
Teras PowerTeras 3 Mon
Boun
Southwert Power & Light 18 Month
VEP 9 Month Fixi
VEP 24MOnth Operations U50 Si
StartexPOwerSe
Bounce Energy Pnce Amencan Ai
Bounce
Direct Energy Pnce Pro[ectl
AmbitEnergyLOne Star'.
Champion Energy Servii
Southwert Power & Light 9 Month
TriEa�
Ambit Energy Lone Star Sel
Teras Power Teras 24 Mon
Amigo Energy Onlii
Ambit Energy Lone Star Sele
Champion Energy ServicE
Taa Paperless e-PI��
Spark Energy Spark Pc
Shrtex I
Bounce Energy Pnce Amencan Ai
Bounce f
Direct Energy Pnce Pro[ectii
Texpo Energy On
Bounce Energy Pnce Bounce 2
Southwert Power & Light 36 Spirit c
Brilliant Energy Brill'rant Low Price 36
VEP 36 Month Fixi
True Electi
Southwert Power & Light 36 Month
Shrtex I
VEP 36MOnth Operations U50 Si
Spark Energy Spark Online Atl�
Froi
�
LibertyPOwerHOmeli
AntlelerPOwerRl
AntlelerPOwer(
Jus[Eni
� � �
N (J7 �I O N (�J7
(n O (n O (n O
Z luauay�ellb'
�
O
�
�!
1
�
O
�
�
O
O
N
�
D
�
�
�
N
�
N
Ou
r
N
D
�
�!
A1`
�/
�
�
D
�
3
�
�
�
�•
�
O!
1
r
O
O
O
^
\
�
$�o
$60
$50
$40
$30
$ao
$io
$o
! �, . �, �, :
� �
, ��
o� oe q° �6 �as �e o'0 e'r . ��¢, .��¢, � ,�^ co ti'- ,�$ � oc� � �55 �z �,b �e� �'� �e� ��,ti �,�e ea' � 1e �.,� cC' � 5ti a� C.
� �`a �� 1 ati �w ♦ ,�� ti � ot ,5 0 5 0 5'� 4'� oti tia �a � �� � .t � o� S 4�' s� 5� ���� ��'
���t�0 �,0 4 ��,�� 0 ��a4�'�,�,tto� 4��4�C ���ti� �oQ��`l� �Cti ��b4" �.� ���b�'� �.o� �ytiw� �' ��`�� Cj�� �-� ,�t� `�" G�� z�� to4 �,�� �° �� ��,40 `�` q�° �tie
��� �,�,a C� �p �ye ��e �,yti S� � o�' � fi Q ��yE ,t� �yti �fi4
��, ��40 ��,oti ���p �1 Y' � ��titi
�
Rates as of FY aoii-aoia
D
v
0
s
3
m
�
co
%,i�
�i
�'
%,/�
�"
� ;.
� ;.
�
�;
�-
�-
�'
�;
Attachment 3
�
� O � O � O �
sr3
� � � � � �
A�
�,�
�yd
Aj� r� �ia�}'
�I�
�1'
' s��
lz�
tl'r
o�
a�
Ja
Aas d�
04,
0
J�
�`rt �o
�� �U
f P. s,�
a
d''�� �I�r
6sd ?
!JQ �
�A
�
h
��d °d
Y,��,
OJ�l� �Q��P
O�
f
�
ss
a�
h�
�
�r�
�1��
A�
fjN
�
�0,�
sf�
o�
tIa
flb
afJ
IN
J�
A�
r
d�ff� �
�Ir
A
O
�1 �� N
�r,, �vo
rla J� �
�� �
�� o
N
�o
��� f w
� �
S�, O
f�AQ rd
�
tf v
0
lfa �
�lrA L�
<)
$1,400
$i,aoo
$i,000
$g00
$E)00
$400
$200
�-
p~~ �,° p� �aS e� tii 1� ._�e �' G° �� e� � fi y5 �
a��o��ti 4~a ��$ �ti �ti S�o�s Go�� �Q1,�,a ���o �t� �~,�,� ���~a� �����' �`°�5�,� ��,1e C'�,��z
G P� �
4° �ta� �� � ��fi oc�
�`� ��fiti
Rates as of FY aoii-aoia
��_��_� ��� ,_. �_�\,_.._.,�\,. � ;�
:�� .� '�� � \ \
w ����b o��b a�l,�e Q�lt
�,� Q.�o4 �ey ����
e
�,�� ���a
�z�
titie ��4 �c� �4 �
4, �y�, �oa �,�o o,ti4
��� ot� G
Cs�'
��o
D
v
c>
s
3
m
�
co
$60
$50
$40
$30
$ao
$io
$o
� , � . �r, : �r, -. �r, :
�: �: �:
, I�
��tio4 ��l,�e Qe1ti ��e ��e55 �oz ol�`C� �ot� ��t�� ��tie .l�c° a���e et' �o�C� Le��eti oSeL� �tsti fi�,e� o�K.� ��e��' �tiofi ��ls a�as �a�a 4oc� la�o S�0 4,�t� �ti�e �,�'� i��'� ��a�z ���1�
�a<'�° �tia4 Co4�,�ti 4' C,° o�ti� �vti'�O C°t �e5°` cs<�Z�Q^s P�t�be ti 4to4 ���t' �� �a�,s �o° 4,�a,v 0 �ya� ��,a 4�a�,ao �stiti� P �,o �11� ��a
t� ����o,t,' ��� �, ����,�, ��o� ���, �o ��5����e ����ao
� �
Rates as of FY aoii-aoia
D
v
0
s
3
m
�
w
$400
�350
$300
$�50
$200
$lrj0
$ioo
$50
� � �` �` . � � �
� �. �
��
� � °
�
� � �
� �
�
� _ � � �
�
_ � � �
�
_ � � �
_ . � � �
� �
�
� �
� ;
� �
� � :
�
� � �
� � � � � �
� �
� � � � ,
_ � � � � � � ; ' � �
� �
� �
� � � � � � �
� � � � � ` '
� � � � � � � � �
� � � �
� � � �
� �
� ;
� � �
�
� �
�
�
�
� > > � � � � � � �
:
� . �
> > � � � . �
. �
� � _ �
. �
� ; �
> > ; 3
� � � � � �
� �
�
� �
� �
�
�o
G°���� {{°�~�o� �r5�~�� �'�`��y �~`�� e���fi
�a � �o��
Cs
Rates as of FY aoii-aoia
��e ,$,�, ,�{�'" ��ay c.o {,b e.� . �tie ���' o� �- ,�,'� {,Z` �b S�'• e �ofi �,o � ,��.�
4' �4�` ��4 �� t�t`� �o� ��,��' Q�.�� ��o„a ���4�0' �4° ���e �,�y�.y ��406 �° ��tia�0 �y5 Q�a ���`i� �„ys
Gt ��,�e ��e�'� � �aca � F5 �o�fi o� � 4 �o� �a�� �`
�� �~ � �z1�� ��,�° �j,�4o
�
v
0
3
m
c.�
$i,600
$i,400
$i,aoo
$i,000
$g00
$E)00
$400
$200
$O
4e�� ���p� ��lZ` �tie� ��e�� �oyi� �,,b�� 4,a�' ��a� ��c,� �ti�� ��,e.� ��t,Z` � '� 4oc�'"' a��e �titie �z�� �,�fi� �a�.� o�e,Z` oti`� ��,�c�'� ��,�pt` ��,�,� �5wtit�
�,04 �,��o ���,� 4' ti ���e ���,� O 4 ��,��� ��.� ��� �y� ��� ��Q� ��ya ���t �,�ti 4 4�04 �`1� �.1� �,o� �,o Pr
Cs� •ti��' o� 4° ta ot` �° 1'�
J�` 4ti � �eti��' ��{,�o� �,tiko
Rates as of FY aoii-aoia
� � �` �` .. � �, , �
� :.� � �:.
D
v
0
s
3
m
�
c.�
S3o.00
Szs.00
$20.00
$15.00
$10.00
$5.00
$-
�`'��� o���'�� ,��'���� �rt���\ �a��ay �,��`'� �o��r �y�\\� a��a�� ���\\¢, ��'��a Q�a�o t��� ,��a�a ����t a a\\y
P �,�tt �� `� ���y �o� �,� �a�� C� �,�e �`�F- �,�� ��+a \r�,
c,°�� L° oe� �
�Large _Standard Small
Residential Rate Comparisons
Fiscal Year 2012
Monthly Residential Refuse Cart Rates
D
v
0
s
3
m
�
�
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
a�
+�
�
°C 40.00
20.00
3 CY Rate Comparison
�,��� c�\,��� J���� \�,�� �,��� '<���� c��� ��o ,\�e o,��L ,��� 0,�3 ��o \�,�� ��� ��5 a,��
G�\�� ���Q P Q.`o G��� �,�� �' G`��� ���o�`I' ��y�`5 ��o��, Q� G�� �G�`� \G��aF �����F-
C�� O p�' �
D
v
0
s
3
m
�
�
140.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
a�
i�
� 60.00
40.00
20.00
4 CY Rate Comparison
,��� \�,�� ��o ���� \��a �o� Or��L .�,�C� �\�� y,��� Or�^� �,�o ��� \,��� ��5 ,��e, ����, �`o� ��a
C����� P�\ � � �a� .�r�ca ��'°�� °'r�� C����� P� ��'°�� e\ �`�'�\� �ae`� � a'���� ���\y ����� � �� ��m��
� O� O� G�� �� G o��� �
G
D
v
0
s
3
m
�
�
a�
+�
�
�
180.00
160.00
140.00
120.00
100.00
g0.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
6 CY Rate Comparison
.`,��e a��5 \o� ��e. �a ,��� �e� ,�e �e �o a� �,'L �'� ��e ,�o ea ��e. a
aQt� �' � �a� ��; a\a PJy �, �\� �;\ �� e�� �o �o ��;\ e\a ��� e�;` �a�
� r� e �,�e C� P ��a� �r �,�oo �,�o'� �es� �c.� �,��� ,��-1-a
��a y�` ��e� Qe �e
Lo
D
v
0
�
3
m
�
�
250.00
200.00
150.00
a�
�
°C 100.00
50.00
8 CY Rate Comparison
t�a�a Jy�\� ��\\e ��a� '�a\e� �aGO �5�\\e '�e�e e,��e 'L�y� .��y�� 'L�y� �a��\� ,�a'���� Q�a�o ���ea .��a�a 5,\\e �a\\y
C�a P �,�e�' �re �e� P� ��a.p ��o� \ra ��o.� �aQ � �c..� ���a �\oe r\a
Oe � O� �ta �o��¢,¢o C� yj.
D
v
0
s
3
m
�
�
AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET
AGENDA DATE: August 14, 2012
DEPARTMENT: Finance
ACM: Jon Fortune �
SUBJECT
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, calling an
election to be held on November 6, 2012, within said city on the question of the issuance of
$20,400,000 in ad valorem tax supported public securities for street and related public art
improvements; malcing provision for the conduct of the election; and containing other provisions
incidental thereto; and declaring an effective date.
BACKGROUND
Over the last several years, the quality of the streets in the City of Denton has deteriorated. As a
result, the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee is proposing a$20.4 million bond program that is
primarily focused on improving street infrastnicture. The program assumes no tax rate increase,
and it is expected that voters would be requested to approve the program in the November 6,
2012, election.
On April 3, 2012, the City Council formally created the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee to
provide recommendations on projects to be financed with General Obligation bonds.
Additionally, the City Council appointed twenty-one (21) members of the public to serve on the
Committee, and Mr. Tim Crouch and Mr. Marty Rivers were appointed as Co-Chairpersons of
the Committee.
The Committee met on April 23, May 7, May 21, June 4, and June 11 to discuss the condition of
existing streets in the community. In addition, the Committee also conducted a tour of various
streets on May 26. On June 6, the Committee presented their preliminary proj ect
recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission, as required by City Charter.
The Committee focused their attention on streets which have an Overall Condition Index (OC�
value of 40 or less (on a 100 point scale). Streets with this value are considered to be poor
streets, and as such, the Committee expressed an interest in focusing on the worst streets in the
community.
The Committee also initiated a public information campaign in May. The purpose of this
campaign was to request bond project recommendations from citizens. As a result of this
campaign, the Committee received a number of recommendations from the public, and each
citizen proposal was discussed specifically by the Committee to deternune whether it should be
recommended in the upcoming bond pacicage. Most notably, Scripnire Street from Ector to
Agenda Information Sheet
August 14, 2012
Page 2
Malone was added to the list of recommended projects due to the feedbacic received from the
public.
Public Art
In 2006, the City Council approved a Public Art Policy which stated "The City of Denton shall
include a base of 2% for the arts from all future Capital Improvement Programs, with the option
and flexibility to increase to a 4% maximum, based on needs and economic conditions."
According to the definition contained in this policy, Public Art "encompasses the broadest
definition of visual art including all artistic disciplines." Under this policy, $400,000 to
$800,000 of the proposed $20 million bond progranl for street reconstniction would need to be
reserved for public art funding.
Since a single issue bond progranl for street infrastnict�ire had not been anticipated when this
policy was drafted, the City Council also asked the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee to
provide a recommendation on whether the policy should be applied in the upcoming bond
program. On May 7, the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee formally recommended to the City
Council that public art be included in the upcoming bond program, and on May 15, the City
Council directed staff to include 2% ($400,000) of the upcoming bond program for public art.
Further, the City Council aslced the Public Art Committee to provide proj ect recommendations.
To this end, the Public Art Committee met on May 24 and May 30 to consider their
recommendations. On June 1, the Public Art Committee formally voted to recommend that
public art be included for the Interstate 35 (I-35) Corridor in the upcoming bond program. It is
anticipated that artistic designs will be constnicted in the concrete retaining walls which
accompany the expansion of I-35. Exhibit 1 is a memorandum from Emerson Vorel, Director of
Parlcs and Recreation, which describes the intersections that are expected to be funded by the
Texas Department of Transportation and the City of Denton.
Citizens Bond Advisorv Committee Recommendations
After reviewing detailed street information, citizen recommendations, recommendations from the
Public Art Committee, and other information, the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee voted on
June 11 to formally recommend projects to the City Council for consideration. As part of this
recommendation, the Committee voted in favor of the Public Art Committee recommendations.
Further, the Committee recommended that both the public art and street project
recommendations be presented to voters for consideration as one ballot and bond proposition.
On June 19, the recommendations of the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee were presented to
the City Council for consideration. Exhibit 2 provides a detailed summary of the street segments
that are recommended for reconstniction, and Exhibit 3 is a copy of the PowerPoint presentation
which was presented to the City Council by the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee on June 19.
Agenda Information Sheet
August 14, 2012
Page 3
Bond Proposition and Ballot Lan�iage Options
On July 17, the City Council conducted a work session regarding potential bond proposition and
ballot langtiage options. While several options were discussed, the general consensus of the City
Council was to include language in both the bond proposition and ballot which indicated the
funds would be used for street improvements and related public art. Accordingly, the attached
ordinance has been written to include the language discussed by the City Council on July 17.
With the passage of the attached ordinance, an election regarding the proposed $20.4 million
bond issuance will be scheduled for November 6, 2012. Mr. Greg Schaecher, bond counsel with
McCall, Parlchurst, and Horton, LLP, will also be in attendance at the City Council meeting in
case there are any additional legal questions from the City Council.
PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS)
At the January 31, 2012, Annual Planning Session, staff briefed the City Council on the proposed
2012 Bond Election priorities and schedule.
On Febniary 6, 2012, the City Council discussed the proposed bond election and indicated a
preference for a twenty-one (21) member Citizen Bond Advisory Committee (3 appointments for
each City Council member).
On Febniary 21, 2012, the City Council discussed the proposed bond election, calendar of
events, and Citizens Bond Advisory Committee appointment process.
On March 6, 2012, the City Council appointed members of the public to the Citizen Bond
Advisory Committee for the proposed 2012 Bond Election.
On April 3, 2012, the City Council formally approved the creation of a Citizens Bond Advisory
Committee and appointed additional members of the public to serve on the Committee.
On April 23, 2012, the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee met to discuss developing
recommendations for the upcoming bond program.
On May 7, 2012, the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee met to discuss developing
recommendations for the upcoming bond program. The Committee also recommended that
public art be included in the upcoming bond program.
On May 15, 2012, the City Council indicated that 2% of the upcoming bond program should be
devoted to public art.
On May 21, 2012, the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee met to discuss developing
recommendations for the upcoming bond program.
On May 24, 2012, the Public Art Committee discussed the upcoming bond program and potential
proj ects.
Agenda Information Sheet
August 14, 2012
Page 4
On May 26, 2012, the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee conducted a tour of various streets in
City.
On May 30, 2012, the Public Art Committee discussed the upcoming bond program and potential
proj ects.
On June 1, 2012, the Public Art Committee recommended that public art in the I-35 Corridor be
included in the upcoming bond progranl.
On June 4, 2012, the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee met to discuss developing
recommendations for the upcoming bond program.
On June 6, 2012, the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee discussed their prelinunary
recommendations with the Planning and Zoning Commission to receive their feedbacic.
On June 11, 2012, the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee formally voted to forward their
recommendations to the City Council for consideration.
On June 19, 2012, the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee presented their recommendations to
the City Council for consideration.
On July 17, 2012, the City Council discussed the upcoming bond election and potential options
for language that could be included in the bond ordinance, proposition, and ballot.
On Augtist 7, 2012, the City Council conducted a public hearing for the upcoming bond election.
EXHIBITS
L Memorandum from Emerson Vorel which describes public art funding
2. Summary of Streets Recommended for Upcoming Bond Progranl
3. PowerPoint presentation which was presented to the City Council by the Citizens
Bond Advisory Committee on June 19
4. Ordinance
Respectfully submitted:
� �-��';l�
� �� %'
Bryan Langley
CFO and Director of Strategic Services
EXHIBIT 1
�1�I,��,���11 �
� j' � � i
��r s� �. �r� i
c �
D � „�
wT �
,,, ,
�
� �,
�
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
601 E. HICKORY, SUITE B, DENTON, TX 76201� (940)349-PARK � FAX (940)349-8384 � parksnrec@cityofdenton.com
Date:
To:
From:
Subj ect:
MEMORANDUM
ALIgLISt 9, ZOIZ
Bryan Langley, CFO and Director of Strategic Services
Emerson Vorel, Director
I-35 Corridor Enhancements
The following intersections will have Bccseline Aesthetics T�ecctments (considered as integral to all of
the project corridor design) and will be funded by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) as
part of the constniction of the corridor through Denton:
• State School Road/Mayhill Road
• Hwy.77
• FM2181/Teasley Lane/Dallas Drive.
• McCornucic Street
• North Texas Blvd.
• West Oalc St.
The intersections below will have Accent Aesthetic T�eatments (which consist of graphic display
enhancements designated to specific primary intersection abutments and are considered as integral to
all of the project corridor design) and will be funded by TxDOT with the constniction of the corridor
through Denton:
• Post Oalc Drive/Lalceview Blvd.
• Lillian Miller Parlcway/Loop 288
• Hwy 377/Fort Worth Drive
• North Texas Boulevard
• Bonnie Brae Street
The City Council has also identified the University Boulevard/Hwy. 380 intersection as an Enhccnced
Aesthetics T�ecctment intersection (above and beyond those listed above and are to be considered as an
added option to the proj ect corridor design and will require specific coordination, obligations and
participation by the City of Denton.) The funding for the enhanced improvements will be provided by
the proposed $400,000 public art bond issuance. The Public Art Comnuttee has also discussed the
possibility of designating the McCormicic Street intersection for an enhanced aesthetics treatment with
the same bond funds.
At this time, the exact design and cost for the "baseline" and "accent" enhancements is not lcnown. As
such, it is possible that the City Council and/or Public Art Comnuttee may wish to "enhance" these
intersections beyond the standard improvements planned by TxDOT. As discussed previously with the
City Council, enhanced panel designs in the concrete retaining walls will cost between $40,000 to
$50,000 for intersections that are designated, and the majority of these enhancements are expected to
be funded by the City of Denton.
II I—� ��`� Co rri d o r AESTHETIC DESIGN GUIDELINES
Notes: '���
• The Gateway Character Zone travels through the cities of Corinth and Denton. Baseline Ae�etics Treatments establish the overall design intent relative to
• The corridor is characterized by a majority of overpass conditions, also contains character, shape, form, proportion and finish for the entire corridor as applied to
two underpass bridge conditions in conjuction with the importance of the passing thevarious corridorconditions and various conventional design and construction
alongside the University of North Texas. standard practices. Baseline Aesthetics are to be considered as integral to all of
the project corridor design.
Baselinelntersections
• Garrison Road
• Meadows Oak Drive
• State School Road
• Dallas Drive
• FM 2181 / Teasley Lane
• McCormick Street
• Avenue D
• West Oak Street
• 380
Baseline / Accent Intersections
• Post Oak Drive
• Lillian Miller / Loop 28
• Fort Worth Drive
• Bonnie Brae Street
a
�
3
m
�
Interstate overpass
Interstate underpass
Bridge over Natural Systems
Rail Line
�f Enhanced Intersections
� Minor Intersections/Crossinqs
• Creek Crossing
�-� :, ,
O
0
4 =
s�
d�
S
rh
00
� �
�� ��i
`0z %Aa
�
d
��n� €�«��e�
— �� ��^�
- �— ts��rs€�,.��.
— � .�� ��a€ tt�.�
- . _ . _. aF�,ra�
. �— � a �tea�ts
Accent Aesthetics Treatments consist of graphic display enhancements
designated to specific primary intersection abutments. Locations and graphic
options to be coordinated with a municipality or an institution. Accents Aesthetics
are to be considered as integral to all of the project corridor design.
Enhanced Aesthetics Treatments provide opportunities to design and construct
corridor elements above and beyond the Baseline Aesthetics Treatments. These
elements may include monumentation, additional landscape and/or hardscape,
bridge lighting or various additional bridge elements. Enhanced Aesthetics are
to be considered as an added option to the project corridor design and will
require specific coordination, obligations and participation with municipalities
and institutions for implementation.
design, bid build format, will incl�
and be constructed prior to the 35
��
r.
>
�. 2/
� ��8 `
� �
� �
�'°
� �
,a . __ ; s . P.:
� � � � Dallas Dr �s�
���- �
_ �, � n l�
A
Gateway Character Zone
e
9 through a conventional � _ �'�
e the baseline aesthetics ` m
:orridor implementation. � � -�PS,�
UNT Pedestrian� _
; an Bridge
'j - � � �
�
a
0
�.�.� 5
� S�
f � ��� �� Texas Blvd ���� � '°'�
t� C`o .
o �.'
�
O F•`' ._
38�0
�� =��� ���� =� ���=
54
II I—� ��`� Co rri d o r AESTHETIC DESIGN GUIDELINES
Notes:
• Graphic Panel to be perforated aluminum panel, precast or precast
formliner.
• Graphic Panel to be confined to abutment panel region only.
• Graphic panel to be offset from abutment panel a minimum of 2„
and a maximum of g„
• Final art work for graphic panel option selection to be coordinated
with municipality or institution.
• Method of application to be consistent through the corridor.
• Artwork option to be mirror image for opposite side abutment.
• Digital artwork for proposed option to be provided to contactor.
�-� :, ,
Retaining Walls - Accent
Court House Option Elevation
Lone Star Option Elevation *For the opposite side abutments do not mirror image
Eagle Option Elevation
�� =��� ���� =� ���=
69
EXHIBIT 2
Citizens Bond Advisory Committee Proposed CIP and Candidate Segments List June 18, 2012
ReasonsLegend
1 Insufficient Funds
---------------------------------°
2 Water Concern
---------------------------------°
3 Wastewater Concern
---------------------------------°
4 Drainage CIP
---------------------------------°
5 LowTraffic Volume
---------------------------------°
6 Fragmentation
---------------------------------°
7 OCI Too High
---------------------------------°
8 Existing Streets CIP
---------------------------------°
9 Anticipated Development
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
John Paine Rd Johnson Ln John Paine Rd 467-2 Res District 3 4 Candidate $ 724,403 $ 724,403 1 5
����. SchmitaA�e �Iine����� Frame 814-2� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 5� ���� Rropose 57�1�8 ��� 7k�1�541 ���� 57,1�8 ����
Pacific St Maple South 694 Res District 1 5 Candidate $ 27,108 $ 808,650 1 5 6
����. FrameSt� Rirtle SchmitaA�� ���� 339-A Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 6���� Rropose �9,676. ��� 848r325 ���� 96,814 ����
Bradley St Houston PI Houston PI 118-2A Res District 3 6 Candidate $ 10,659 $ 858,984 1 5
Schmita A�e Frarne Mingo�Rd 814-3 Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 6���� Rropose 1(1Ot666 ���� 959r6 Q ���� 197,4 9����
Wood St S Mulberry E Sycamore E 987-2 Res District 1 7 Proposed $ 41,345 $ 1,000,994 $ 238,824
����. (?akSt�E Cra�rf�rd N ����� Woad S 656-7 Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 7���� Rropose 57�523� 1�0 Sr518� ���� 296,34 ����
Highland Park Rd Laurel Willowcrest Loop 407-6 Res District 4 7 Candidate $ 66,399 $ 1,124,917 1 5
Colli�ls St E lahmm� West� 2(l.9 es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 7���� Can i' ate 34r283� 1�159r199 1 5� ����
Oakland St Hann Withers 668-6 Col District 1 7 Candidate $ 27,189 $ 1,186,388 1 2 3
Gae1i�. Ct Glengary UUy West 34�Z es is#ri�t 2' 8 Rropose 52,5�2. 1�7�8r920 ��,879
Rose St Paisley Lehrman 782-2 Res District 1 8 Proposed $ 81,662 $ 1,320,582 $ 430,541
����. Thomas St� Hauston FI Alamo�Rl 89Q-II Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 8���� Rropose 25t4Z3� 1�346tOQ � ���� 455t96A ����
Atlas Dr Hercules Ln Sun Valley Dr 28-5 Res District 2 8 Candidate $ 46,368 $ 1,392,374 1 5 6
Union�����Cir Unibn Cir� Union Cir 1878-2� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 8���� Can i' ate 4�909 1�44L1,283� 1 3
Greenleaf Cir Fishtrap North 1313 Res District 2 8 Candidate $ 171,029 $ 1,611,312 1 5 6
����. FrameSt� Sch��litzA� Te�as 339-5� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 8���� Rropose 25t8�� 1�6�7120 ����481,7 3����
Prairie St W Welch S Bernard 744-6 Res District 3 8 Candidate $ 112,719 $ 1,749,839 1 5
�ngs Row Sunrtydale Ln. ���� Stuart�Rd 487-3 �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 9����� Rroposed $ 321�1�8 �� �;070�9?7 �� ����� 8t12;911 ����
Mulberry St E Russell Bell Av E 633-4 Res District 1 9 Candidate $ 57,154 $ 2,128,131 1 3
����. Whitney Ct. East: Savannah Tr �� 956. es �� istri�t 4���� 9���� Rropose 19r9�4 �;148r065 ���� 822�845-���
Royal Ln Rockwood Ln Mistywood 786 Res District 2 9 Candidate $ 125,575 $ 2,273,641 1 3 5
Te�as St� Woa�l N: Ruddell N 887-7 Res � is#ri�t�1 ���� 9���� Can i� ate 43t287 �;�16t928� 1
Hettie St Paisley Davis 392 Res District 1 9 Proposed $ 156,027 $ 2,472,955 $ 978,872
���� GYestrneadav,r S#. Windsar� W ���� West�iew Tr ���� 246-2' Res �� is#ri�t'3 ��� 9���� Rropose 2Q�416. �;493r371 ���� 999�288 ����
Mulberry St E Industrial Russell 633-3 Res District 1 9 Candidate $ 22,101 $ 2,515,471 1
Lynhurs# Ln. Rembroak.Rl ����� Fennsyl�rania��� 5��-3 Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 9���� Can i� ate 42r61�' �;558r084 1 5� ����
Frame St College E Pirtle 339-3 Res District 1 9 Proposed $ 25,937 $ 2,584,021 $ 1,025,225
����. SchmitaA�e BellA��: �ine 814 es ��is#ri�t�1 ���� 9���� Rropose 4 t197 �;629r218� 1:0 0�422�����
Kingfisher Ln Meadowlark Ln King Fisher Ln 484-2 Res District 2 9 Proposed $ 36,979 $ 2,666,197 $ 1,107,401
���� Bentoaks Dr� C7akhurst. (?alihurst� 84 �� es �� is#ri�t 4���� 9���� Rropose 831492. �749r6�9 11190�893 ����
Highland St W Ave C S Ave A 402-3 Col District 3 9 Proposed $ 347,885 $ 3,097,574 $ 1,538,778
AnnaSt' Ranhanc�le Egan 2Q 5 Res � istricf2 ���� 9���� Fropo�ed 49�3Qb'. � ��146r87� 1�588�(l8� ����
1 or 23
Note
Name From To SegID Class District OCI
Lehrman St Rose Bradshaw N 504 Res District 1 9
Committee
Committee
Proposal
Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Candidate $ 67,025 $ 3,213,904
Brandywine St Briarwood West 125-4 Res District 2 9 Proposed $ 16,467 $ 3,258,491 $ 1,604,551
Sheratan RI Sheraton Rd ����� Bucki�lgham [ir� 829 es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 9���� Rropose 55t228 3s�13,71� 1:659�7 9����
Lariat Rd Lariat Rd West 498-2 Res District 3 10 Candidate $ 66,784 $ 3,380,503 1 3 5
Uniarr����Cir Unibn Cir� Frairi� W 1878-3 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 10 ���� Can i� ate 7, tA9J 3s4 6tOQ2 1 3
Ave D Mulberry W Sycamore W 47-2 Col District 3 10 Candidate $ 123,232 $ 3,579,234 1
Mill St Wye����� Industrial 602. � es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 10 ���� Can i' ate 21�t�2 3s6Q0�276. 1
Wood St Hickory E Mulberry E 987 Res District 1 10 Candidate $ 65,869 $ 3,666,145 1 5
A�e C��i: C7ak 1rU Hi�kory W 43� �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� 10 ���� Candietate $� 107�578� � 3s773r77�' 1
public input Bell Ave N Administration Dr College E 78-J7B Col District 1 10 Proposed $ 142,680 $ 3,916,403 $ 1,802,459
����� 6o�ivar st. suns�t. westway 1�c-11 �o� Distri�t�z� ��� 10 ������ Rroposed $� ������ s7�379 � 3s973r7sz. � 11s5s�s3s ������
Welch St S Hickory W Mulberry W 935 Sar District 3 10 Candidate $ 126,581 $ 4,100,363 1 3
A�e A����� ��te f� Greenlee 36 6. Res � is#ri�t�3 ��� 10 ���� Can i' ate 85t7S5 ?��186t11&' 1
Wye St Mill Industrial 1001 Res District 1 10 Candidate $ 33,127 $ 4,219,245 1 3 5
����. Goadsan UUay ���� Bonnie Brae S����� West� 364 es �� is#ri�t 4���� 10 ���� Rropose ���� 127�646 ?��346t891 11987,4�3 ����
Kendolph Dr Willowwood South 477-7 Res District 4 11 Proposed $ 177,192 $ 4,524,083 $ 2,164,675
����� Egan$t� Carroll B�t N: ����� Anna. 297-1 Res � istri�t�2� ��� 11 ���� Can i� ate 34r524 ?��558r606. 1 2 3 5
public input Bell Ave N Texas Withers 78-JA Col District 1 11 Candidate $ 113,404 $ 4,672,010 1
���� �ocust St S Dau�her�j! E����� South Locust�� 526-11 Res � istri�t�1 11 ���� Can i� ate 91�5��� ?��763r544 1 s� ���
Hickory St W Cedar N Elm N 394-J9 Col District 1 11 Candidate $ 58,556 $ 4,822,099 1 4 9
Manhattan Dr� ��� CaHsbad FI Ye11�v,rstone Fark. 545-3 Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 11 � Can i' ate 72,562. ?��894r661 1 5
Gardenview St Fallmeadow Joyce Ln 350 Res District 2 11 Proposed $ 78,340 $ 4,973,001 $ 2,243,015
future CIF Gay Dr Uni+€ersit�? Dr�1kU North. 35�' � es � is#ri�t�3 ��� 11 Can i' ate 69,721 St(142�72�' 1 5 ���� 8
Oakhurst St Bentoaks Dr Oakhurst 666 Res District 4 11 Proposed $ 38,279 $ 5,081,002 $ 2,281,295
����. Fox�Creek Ct� ����� Longmeadav,r ���� North. 335 es �� is#ri�t�1 11 ���� Rropose 6(l��}76. St141�47� 2t�A1�7 1
Ave C S Highland W Maple 44-SW Col District 3 11 Candidate $ 36,428 $ 5,177,906 1
����. Foxv,road Cir ����� Ha{lycreek. South 338=2� Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 11 ���� Rropose 24,412 St2Q2�318� 2t�66,183 ����
Crestmeadow St Brookhollow Dr Westward 246-4 Res District 3 11 Proposed $ 30,431 $ 5,232,749 $ 2,396,614
Johnson St Mill Dallas Dr 469 Res District 1 11 Candidate $ 59,947 $ 5,337,764 1 2 5 6
Kenwood St Fox Hollow Deer Tr 479 Res District 1 11 Proposed $ 33,512 $ 5,424,320 $ 2,483,169
public input Scripture added Scripture St Gober Jagoe 817-9 Col District 3 11 Proposed $ 48,022 $ 5,511,632 $ 2,531,191 1 3
Foxcroft Cir� Er�ermn Ln ArcherTr 337 �� es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 11 ; Can i' ate 9�;604 St6Q5��35 1 5
Edgewood PI Crestwood PI Crestwood PI 289-3 Res District 2 11 Candidate $ 19,645 $ 5,624,881 1 3 5 6
Lynhurst Ln Jefferson Pembrook PI 537-2 Res District 4 12 Proposed $ 102,222 $ 5,758,064 $ 2,633,413
Faulir�e St� Elm N: Locust�N: 707 �� es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 12� ���� Can i� ate 50�076. St808r14Q 1 5� ����
Nevada St Inca Rd Navajo 645-2 Res District 1 12 Candidate $ 48,920 $ 5,857,060 1 5 6
public input Scripture added Scripture St Marietta Gober 817-8 Col District 3 12 Proposed $ 23,481 $ 5,978,623 $ 2,754,976 1 3
Manhattan Dr� ��� Stuart Rd Monterey Dr ����� 545 � es � is#ri�t�2� ��� 12� ���� Can i' ate 38;761 6,017t383� 1 5
Pockrus Page Rd 135E N Private Dr 735 Col District 1 12 Candidate $ 246,405 $ 6,263,788 1 3 9
2 0. 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Jannie St Davis McKinney E 457-3 Res District 1 12 Candidate $ 53,302 $ 6,346,366 1 5
p�lkzli�inpuf Bonnie�Brae�SfN C?1d 6annie�Brae Ranhandle� 1Q71C �ar � istricf� ��� 12 ���� Candidate� 206;6�3 61552�999 1 9
public input Bell Ave N Chapel Dr Administration Dr 78-J7A Col District 1 12 Candidate $ 133,413 $ 6,686,412 1
���� 6olivax St. Colle�e W Thi�d W 1�6-13 �ol Dis#ri�t�2' ��� 12' ���� Rroposed $ ��� 106,747 � 6�793r15� � 2t861�724 ����
public input Scripture added Scripture St Bradley Marietta 817-7 Col District 3 12 Proposed $ 115,993 $ 6,909,152 $ 2,977,717 1 3
Thomas St� Alarno FI (?ak.W 89Q-9 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 12� ���� Can i� ate 4�6�Q 6,956t773� 1 3 5� ����
Congress St W Fulton Amarillo 216-4 Col District 2 12 Candidate $ 69,620 $ 7,026,392 1
����. Highland St W����� Central A�� Welch S 4Q2-5 � �ol Distri�t�3 ��� 12� ����� Rroposed $� ����� 79r882. � 7.1L16t274 � �;057,599 �����
Carriage Hill Brooklake Brookhollow Dr 170-2 Res District 3 12 Proposed $ 80,266 $ 7,186,540 $ 3,137,865
Lakev,�oad Dr� Green�ray Dr� ���� Carciage Hill ����� 494 es �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 12� ���� Can i' ate 76,79J 7,263r3AQ 1 2 ���� 5� ����
Linden Dr Malone Bryan 512-9 Res District 3 12 Candidate $ 94,374 $ 7,357,714 1 5 6
publi� i�lput� �� Mocki�gbird Ln: Terry Ct Beuerly Dr� 62i1-�} �ol Dis#ri�t�1 12� ����� Candietate $ �7�1�4 �� 7,�94r84�. 1
Amarillo St Egan Congress E 16-3 Res District 2 12 Candidate $ 46,080 $ 7,440,927 1 3 5 6
����. Thomas St� Hauston FI Ho�jstan RI ����� 89Q-7 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 12� ���� Rropose 21�956. 7.4�Z2:884 �:159�821 ����
Nevada St Creek Av Inca Rd 645 Res District 1 12 Candidate $ 27,975 $ 7,490,859 1 3 5 6
Mill St. Allen Ct. Cross Timber� 602-A Res �� istri�t�1 12� ���� Can i� ate 41�6Q2 7,5�2;461 1
Stanley St Linden Dr Panhandle 851-3 Res District 3 13 Candidate $ 98,226 $ 7,630,687 1 5
����. Woad�St�N McKinney E ���� (?ak.E 98b-A Res � is#ri�t�1 ���� 13 ���� Rropose 38;7 ��7 7.669 A6�' �;198,598 ����
Highland St W Ave A Central Av 402-4 Col District 3 13 Proposed $ 83,780 $ 7,753,243 $ 3,282,378
����. Woad�St�N {}ak E Hi�kory E 98b-5� Res �� is#ri�t�1 13 ���� Rropose 38;26�' 7.791t50 ; �;�20�641
Welch St S Eagle Dr W Fannin 935-8 Sar District 3 13 Candidate $ 140,630 $ 7,932,137 1 2
DentonSt� Rarku�rayW Fearl 26�-5� Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 13 ���� Can i' ate 49,691 7,981�827 1 2 3 5
DudleySt West McCormick 274 Res District4 13 Candidate $ 20,030 $ 8,001,858 1 5 6
���� Darby����Lrt. Barrov,r Di� Candy Lri 255 es �� is#[i�t'3 ��� 13 ���� Rropose ���� 134,4�5 8,1�6t29�' �455tQ 6����
public input Bernard St Fannin Collins W 87-9 Col District 3 13 Candidate $ 85,333 $ 8,221,625 1
(?akri�lge St� Cresfoak RI Edge�road FI ����� 671 �� es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 13 ���� Can i� ate 66,88(l 8,288,506. 1 5� ����
Maid Marian PI Jamestown Ln Locksley Ln 543 Res District 2 13 Candidate $ 81,518 $ 8,370,023 1 3 5 6
Southiidge Dr ����� Ridgecrest Cr ����� Stanegate 847-1 �ol Dis#ri�t 4���� 13 ����� Candietate $ 88;157 �� 8,458r181 1
Mill St Cook Allen Ct 602-3 Res District 1 13 Candidate $ 42,228 $ 8,500,408 1
Welcl� St S Fannin. Colti�ls W 9�5-9 �ar� � istri�t�3 ��� 13 ���� Can i� ate ���� 141�256 8,641t664 1
public input Bernard St Eagle Dr W Fannin 87-8 Col District 3 13 Proposed $ 95,719 $ 8,737,383 $ 3,550,795
����� �nrert, st n� e�a� int �i�kory w���� s��� �oi m��ri�t�� ��� 1� ������ Rropo�e� ������� n�;�s� �� s,�$st��o �� �sss�ssz������
CrestmeadowSt WestviewTr BrookhollowDr 246-3 Res District3 13 Proposed $ 78,485 $ 8,864,655 $ 3,678,066
Carrall BI�€d N����� North Northridge ����� 171 �� es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 13 ���� Can i' ate 19r5Q1 8,88Ar155 1 5
Deer Trail Kenwood Timberridge 260 Res District 1 13 Proposed $ 111,467 $ 8,995,623 $ 3,789,533
Welcl� St S Highland W Ma�le 9�5-Fi �ar � is#ri�t�3 ��� 13 ���� Can i' ate 12�;66Q ��119r282. 1
Prairie St W 135 West 744 Res District 3 13 Candidate $ 38,761 $ 9,158,043 1 5 6
Fladger Dr� Darb�? Ln. Westgate Dr ����� 322-2� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 13 ���� Rropose 56,2�9 ��214r282. �;8�t7 3����
Hercules Ln Atlas Dr Stuart Rd 390-4 Col District 2 13 Proposed $ 145,771 $ 9,360,054 $ 3,991,544
����. Amari�lo St� Ranhandle Eg�n. 16 2 Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 13 ���� Rropose 4�,51�' ��4Q6�567 4r038,0 7����
Sycamore St E Bell Av E Exposition 869-4 Res District 1 13 Candidate $ 193,996 $ 9,600,563 1
publi� i�lput� �� Bernard St� Collins W Greenlee 871 �ol Distri�t�3 ��� 14 ����� Candietate $ ����� 156,953� �� ��757t516. 1
public input Bonnie Brae St N Linden Dr Crescent 107-1E Sar District 3 14 Candidate $ 189,941 $ 9,947,457 1 9
3 0. 23
Note
Name
public input Scripture removed Hillcrest St
From
Crescent
To SegID Class District
Linden Dr 413-3 Res District 3
Committee
OCI Proposal
14 Candidate $
Committee
Proposal
Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
66,543 $ 10,082,020
Sun Valley Dr Valley View Ct Sunnydale Ln 863-3 Res District 2 14 Candidate $ 40,205 $ 10,172,446 1 5
Hamptan Dr� Cindy Ln. Lariat�Rd 3�0-2� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 14 ���� Can i' ate 129r283� �t1�3Q1t72� 1 3 5
Darby Ln Candy Ln Fladger Dr 255-2 Res District 3 14 Candidate $ 113,008 $ 10,414,737 1 5 6
����� 6o��var st. uni;€er�ity or�l�r sunset� 1�c-1 �o� ois�ri�t�z� ��� 14 ������ Rroposed $� ������ 6s,476. � 1a�n�Arz1�� � 4r1o7,s�3 �����
Marshall Rd Lariat Rd Tieszen St 560-2 Res District 3 14 Proposed $ 123,264 $ 10,607,477 $ 4,230,797
Lariat�Rd Lariat Rd Cindy Ltl 498=3 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 14 ���� Can i� ate ���� 12Qt953� �t1�728,430 1 5
Southridge Dr Ridgecrest Cr Ridgecrest Cr 847-6 Col District 4 14 Candidate $ 88,157 $ 10,816,587 1
���� Thunderbird Dr ���� Broaklake West�iew Tr ���� 891-Fi �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� 14 ���� Rroposed $ ��� 64r382. � 1t1�880�969 � 4r295t179 ����
Sagebrush Dr Yucca Dr Retama 797-3 Res District 2 14 Candidate $ 44,154 $ 10,925,122 1 2 3 5 6
Eagle Dr W MyrNe Fort Worth Dr� 2�0-18 Sar� � istri�t�1 14 ���� Can i� ate 73t584 �t1�998,706. 1 ��� 4. ��
public input Scripture added Scripture St Ector Bradley 817-6 Col District 3 14 Proposed $ 62,852 $ 11,061,558 $ 4,358,031 1 3
�ocksley Lrt Er�termn Ln ����� lamestawn Ln 516. es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 14 ���� Can i' ate �St96�� � 11�0.97�526. 1 5� ����
Egan St Amarillo Alice 297-6 Res District 2 14 Proposed $ 76,944 $ 11,174,470 $ 4,434,975
Bradsha�+rSt�N: ��� {7ak E Hi�kory E 121-5� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 14 ���� Can i' ate 38;376. � 11�212�84' 1 5
Windsor Dr W Carriage Hill Westgate Dr 976-2 Sar District 3 14 Proposed $ 49,993 $ 11,262,838 $ 4,484,967
Fallmeadow Ct Fallmeadow West 312 Res District 2 14 Candidate $ 27,205 $ 11,314,696 1 2
Santa Fe St Ruidosa Ct Phoenix Ct 808 Res District 1 14 Proposed $ 54,458 $ 11,406,518 $ 4,601,442
Fladger Dr West Darby Ln 322 Res District 3 14 Proposed $ 26,483 $ 11,613,552 $ 4,627,924
Ye11ov,�tane FI ����� KingS Ct Laguna Dr 1(l02 � Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 14 ���� Can i' ate �9,82Q � 11�653r372. 1 3 5
public input Bell Ave N Withers Mingo Rd 78-JA1 Col District 1 15 Candidate $ 291,661 $ 11,945,033 1
Union Cir Chestnut Union Cir 1878 Res District 3 15 Candidate $ 73,332 $ 12,108,887 1 2 3
Sagewood St Willow Stone Tanglewood 798-3 Res District 2 15 Proposed $ 35,968 $ 12,188,339 $ 4,707,376
Paisley St Crawford N Wood N 695-4 Col District 1 15 Candidate $ 42,843 $ 12,255,192 1 2
Mill St. Cross Tirnber ����� W�!e 602-5� Res � is#ri�t�1 15� ���� Can i' ate 7, t644 ��;�30,8�6. 1
Chestnut St Ave C Ave C 190-2N Res District 3 15 Candidate $ 5,393 $ 12,336,229 1 5
����� Hercules Ln. Camelot. Stuart�Rd 39Q-AN2. �ol Distri�t�2� ��� 15� ������ Rroposed $ 160t3Z8 �� 12;496t557 �� 4r891�715�������
Montclair PI Bellaire Dr Mockingbird Ln 623-2 Res District 1 15 Candidate $ 92,063 $ 12,588,619 1 5 6
publi� i�lput� �� Mocki�gbird Ln��: Hurnrningbird Ln. Mc�nney E���� 62i1-17 �ol Dis#ri�t�1 ���� 15� ����� Candietate $ 14C�125 �� 12;7��r744 1
Laurel St Azalea Wisteria 501-4 Res District 4 15 Proposed $ 37,509 $ 12,772,253 $ 4,929,224
Bl�e R3dge Ct� ����� Sauthri�lge Dr� ���� South 1�53 Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 15 ����� Can i' ate 1�86 � 12�7�6t12Q 1 5� ����
Marshall Rd Tieszen St Hampton Dr 560-2A Res District 3 15 Candidate $ 143,439 $ 12,929,559 1 3 5 6
����. G1�1dyLri LariatRd Tie�zenSt� ����� 2(10-1 Res ��is#ri�t�3 ��� 15� ���� Rropose ���� 122,879 � 13s0 2�438� �052�1L12�����
Bayberry St Canyon Ct South 74 Res District 1 15 Proposed $ 41,746 $ 13,094,184 $ 5,093,848
Marshall Rd Uni+€ersit�? W����� Lariat�Rd 56Q es � is#ri�t�3 ��� 15� ���� Rropose 126,7�1 � 13s220�914 5�220�579 ����
Ave A Maple Eagle Dr W 36-4 Col District 3 15 Candidate $ 167,428 $ 13,388,343 1
Congress St W����� EIm N: Locust�N: 216-12� �ol Dis#ri�t�1 ���� 15� ����� Candietate $ 75t1S1 �� 13s4�Z3�494 1
public input Laurelwood Dr Redwood PI Rockwood Ln 502-2 Res District 2 15 Candidate $ 36,738 $ 13,500,233 1 5 6
4 0. 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Ridgecrest Cir Pennsylvania Southridge 770-J1 Res District 4 15 Candidate $ 94,230 $ 13,666,965 1 3
€?akland St' Teaeas Hann 6�8 5 Col Qistrict 1 15 Canditlate $ 43�8�43 $ 13�710,809 1 2 3
Highland St W North Texas Bv Ave D 402 Col District 3 15 Proposed $ 162,779 $ 13,873,588 $ 5,455,862
6arraiN Dr� Wesf DarUy Ln 70 es �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 15� ���� Rropose �9,194 13s912;782. 5,495tQ 6����
Panhandle St Aileen Gober 699-6 Col District 3 15 Proposed $ 176,518 $ 14,089,300 $ 5,671,574
Amari�loSt� North Fanhandle ���� 16 ��es ��is#ri�t�2���� 15� ���� Rropose 281�}09 14,117t7i18� 5,699�982'����
Hickory St W Ave C N Ave B N 394-J Sar District 3 15 Candidate $ 158,365 $ 14,276,074 1 2 3
����. MaySt� Hendermn Dr ��� Finekney Dr� ����� 568=3 Res � is#ri�t�1 ���� 16 ���� Rropose �316 �7 14.3Q9r730 5�733�6�9 ����
Mack Dr Paisley Doubleoak 538-3 Col District 1 16 Proposed $ 185,731 $ 14,495,461 $ 5,919,369
Mill Fond Rd Er�ermn Ln (?Id��:North Rd, 6Q�' � es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 16 ���� Can i' ate 91�678� 14,587�1�9 1 3 5
Nail Rd University Dr W Jim Christal Rd 640 Col District 3 16 Candidate $ 745,747 $ 15,332,886 1 5
Lariat�Rd Cindy Ln. Ma�shall 498� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 16 ���� Can i' ate ���� 1181256 � 15t4 1t142 1 3 5
Windsor Dr E Blue Bonnet PI Sherman Dr E 975-8 Sar District 2 16 Candidate $ 190,080 $ 15,641,222 1
publi� i�lput� �� Bell A�e N Colle�e E (?Id��: Mai�1 Cir ���� 781� �ol Dis#ri�t�1 ���� 16 ����� Candietate $ 25t247 �� 15t666t�}69 1 3
Paisley St Mulkey Ln Royal Meadow 695-J3 Col District 1 16 Candidate $ 67,383 $ 15,733,852 1
Alamc��Fl Thornas East� 7����� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 16 ���� Can i' ate 21�716. � 15t7 5�568 1 3 5
Kings Row Sagebrush Dr Valley View Rd 487 Col District 2 16 Proposed $ 51,998 $ 15,807,566 $ 5,971,367
South[idge Dr ����� Rennsyl�rania. ���� Ridgecrest Cr� 847-f3 �ol Dis#ri�t 4���� 16 ����� Candietate $ ����� 12�;17�' �� 15t930�7�9 1
Hickory St E Exposition Bradshaw N 393-8 Col District 1 16 Candidate $ 175,785 $ 16,106,524 1 2 3
A�e D����� Highland W Ma�le 47-4 �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� 16 ����� Candidate $ 95t3�7 �� �Fz,2Q1t861 1
public input Mockingbird Ln Anysa Ln Howard Ct 620-6 Col District 1 16 Candidate $ 36,840 $ 16,238,701 1
Hickory St W ����� A�e G N: A�e G N 394-3 �ar� � istri�t�3 ��� 16 ���� Can i� ate 40t826. � 1(�279r527 1 2 3
Hercules Ln Atlas Dr Camelot 390-4N Col District 2 16 Proposed $ 65,691 $ 16,345,217 $ 6,037,058
Williarnsburg Rw larYtestov�rn Ln ��: Nottingham Dr 96Q es �� istri�t�2� ��� 16 ���� Can i� ate ���� 152,395 1Fz,497�612. 1 3 5
Linden Dr Thomas Hillcrest 512-3 Res District 3 16 Proposed $ 67,314 $ 16,564,926 $ 6,104,371
D�ugherty St W���� MyrNe Locust S 258� es �� is#ri�t�1 16 ���� Can i' ate �1�586. � 1Fz�596t512. 1 5� ����
Mill St Industrial Cook 602-2 Res District 1 16 Candidate $ 33,512 $ 16,630,024 1
Skylark.Dr� Rennsyl�rania. ���� East� 84Q-2� Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 16 ���� Can i� ate 38;52Q �C�,668,544 1 3 5
Highview Cir Forrestridge Dr Highview Ct 409 Res District 4 16 Proposed $ 161,303 $ 16,829,847 $ 6,265,674
�o�€ers Ln Fruth.Rd Frn ���117�' 1�26-3 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 16 ���� Can i� ate ���� 227�894 � 17,0 7t741 1 5� ����
Meadow Ln Sagewood Meadow Lane PI 586-2 Res District 2 16 Candidate $ 36,209 $ 17,093,950 1 3 5 6
Hercules Ln. Redstone Rd ����� Atlas Dr� 39Q-3 �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 16 ����� Rroposed $ 145t889 �� 17,7�9r8�9 �� 6t411�563 �����
Smith St Dallas Dr Hill 841-2 Res District 1 16 Candidate $ 93,074 $ 17,332,913 1 3 5
Hickory St W ����� Bernard Dentan. 394-14 �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 16 ���� Can i' ate ���� 187,4�7 � 17,520�35Q 1 2 3
Santa Fe St Travis Laredo Ct 808-3 Res District 1 17 Proposed $ 31,201 $ 17,551,551 $ 6,442,764
����. Garden�iew St. ���� layce Ln. Broake 350-2� Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 17 ���� Rropose 831974 � 17.6�5�525 6t526,7�8 ����
Woodbrook St Southridge Dr Hollyhill Ln 988-3 Res District 4 17 Proposed $ 53,061 $ 17,688,586 $ 6,579,799
Spri�lgside Rd ����� Wesf Westcourt Rd 1183 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 17 ���� Can i' ate 231�6 0 � 17,920�23b. 1 5
Egan St Coit Carroll Bv N 297-9 Res District 2 17 Candidate $ 32,983 $ 17,953,218 1 2 3 5
Laguna Dr� Stuait Rd Ye11�v,r�tone FI 49�' � es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 17 ���� Can i' ate 114r549 ��8,067�767 1 3 5� ����
Thomas St Scripture Houston PI 890-6 Res District 3 17 Proposed $ 52,772 $ 18,120,540 $ 6,632,572
���� Highviev�r Cir ���� High�iev�r Ct. ���� For�estridge [ir� 4Q9-2' Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 17 ���� Rropose ���� 16�614 �8,28�}t15�' 6t796,185 �����
Laurel St Jasmine Camellia 501-2 Res District 4 17 Proposed $ 37,509 $ 18,321,662 $ 6,833,694
5 0. 23
Note
public input
Committee
Committee
Proposal
Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Bell Ave N Schmitz Av Texas 78-J9 Col District 1 17 Candidate $ 89,275 $ 18,458,703 1
Quail Ridge Dr Cooper Branch E La Palma Dr 756 Res District 2 17 Proposed $ 150,372 $ 18,655,299 $ 7,031,831
publi� i�lput� �� Mistywoad Ln ����� Woa�lha�€en ����� Rayal Ln. 618� Res � is#ri�t�2� ��� 17 ���� Can i' ate 7�81fl �8,7�3r1(l9 1 3
Weston Dr Pace Dr Woodson Cr 947 Res District 1 17 Proposed $ 38,039 $ 18,771,148 $ 7,069,870
6ab-C?-Link.Ln. ���� Bellai�e Dr� Moc�Cingbird Ln 1�5-2� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 17 ���� Can i' ate 92,8��' �8,8b3r981 1 5� ����
Allen St Wye Mill 13 Res District 1 17 Candidate $ 45,454 $ 18,909,435 1 5 6
����. (?aktree St Audra Ln (?ak.Fark.Dr �� 66�-5� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 17 ���� Rropose 9�;218� 1��(102;6 �' 7�163si188 ����
Grace Temple Ave Fulton Ponder Av 365 Res District 2 17 Candidate $ 50,991 $ 19,053,644 1 5 6
����. Sheratan Rd ����� North Hercules Ln. ���� 83Q es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 17 ���� Rropose 43t287 1��i196t9�1 7�206,375�����
Gober St Sena Scripture 362-8 Res District 3 17 Candidate $ 57,539 $ 19,154,470 1 5 6
publi� i�lput� �� 6annie Brae St�N Ranhandle Linden Dr 1�7-1D �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 17 ���� Can i� ate ���� 2831�}16 1��437�886. 1 ��
Jannie St Noble Davis 457-2 Res District 1 17 Candidate $ 94,904 $ 19,532,790 1 5
�o�€ers Ln Mas�h Branch �d Little Broak.R�l 1�26 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 17 ���� Can i' ate 541�7�6 20�0 4r526. 1 5� ����
Hampton Dr Marshall Rd Cindy Ln 380 Res District 3 17 Candidate $ 122,253 $ 20,196,778 1 5
Hercules Ln. Redstone Rd ����� Titan Tr 39Q-3N �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 17 ���� Candietate $ 41�1�6. �� 20�2�7915 1 3
Titan Trail Redstone Rd Hercules Ln 895 Res District 2 17 Candidate $ 129,186 $ 20,367,101 1 5
lamestov,rn.Ln. �� Locksley Ln Maid Marion����.Rl 456. es �� is#ri�t�2' ��� 17 ���� Can i' ate 62,547 20�429r64� 1 3 5
Panhandle St Stanley Thomas 699-2 Col District 3 17 Candidate $ 87,804 $ 20,517,452 1 3
con�r�� st w������ c�rroii a� n� ����� a�i�,r�r z�c-� ��i m��ri�t�z� ��� 1� ������ can�i�ate ������� �zots��� �� zo�c�sro�s 1�
Oakwood Dr Mercedes Rd East 674-4 Res District 4 18 Candidate $ 35,294 $ 20,673,389 1 2 3 5
����. Faisley St. Race����� Dr Meng GY� 695-19 �ol Dis#ri�t�1 ���� 18 ����� Rroposed $ ����� 62,705 �� 20�7�6t094 �� 7�269�(l80 �����
Cooper Branch St E Quail Ridge Dr Chaparral Ct 220-2 Res District 2 18 Proposed $ 39,820 $ 20,775,914 $ 7,308,900
����. Rose St Lehrman. Uland 782-3 Res � is#ri�t�1 ���� 18 ���� Rropose 43t142. 20�819r056. 7��52�(l43 ����
Fowler Dr Peach Forest 334-2 Res District 2 18 Candidate $ 106,315 $ 20,925,371 1 5 6
Woad�St�N Raisley Davis 98b-2� Res � is#ri�t�1 ���� 18 ���� Can i' ate ���� 11�;7 8� 21.0�9r15Q 1 5
Bonnie Brae St S Vintage Blvd CI 110-J31 Col District 3 18 Candidate $ 534,240 $ 21,573,390 1 8
Ste11a St ��te H A�e G S 85�=2� Res � istri�t�3 ��� 18 ���� Can i� ate 69,7�1 21.643,111 1 3 5
Penniman Rd Indigo Mockingbird Ln 1425 Res District 1 18 Proposed $ 78,725 $ 21,721,837 $ 7,430,768
MissionSt W ���� lar�es Fort Worth Dir� 616. es �� istri�t�3 ��� 18 ���� Can i� ate ���� 10 t015 21.826t852 1 3 5 ��
Eagle Dr W Carroll Bv W Carroll Bv E 280-J6A Sar District 3 18 Candidate $ 14,188 $ 21,841,040 1 9
Eagle Dr W Carroll B�tS My[tle 2�0-17 Sar� � istri�t�1 18 ���� Can i� ate ���� 142r786 21.98�,82F� 1 ��
Fouts St Hickory W Oak W 333 Res District 3 18 Candidate $ 45,983 $ 22,029,809 1 3 5 6
����. Windsor Dr�E ����� Glen�road Ln. ���� Bri�ta{ 9?5-12� �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� 18 ���� Rropose 64r545 22;i194r354 7�495t313 ����
Wye St Cross Timber Public Alley A602 1001-5 Res District 1 18 Candidate $ 75,740 $ 22,170,094 1 3 5
Wye�t� A602 5 MiU 1(l0�-Fi Res �� istri�t�1 18 ���� Can i� ate 3Qt96Q 22;2Q1t054 1 3 5
Hickory St W North Texas Bv Miller 394-7 Sar District 3 18 Candidate $ 99,248 $ 22,300,302 1 2 3
Co[daira Cir Moncayo Dr� ����� Corda#ra Cir ����� 233=2A Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 18 ���� Can i' ate �St583� 22;�35�885 1 5
Sun Valley Dr Atlas Dr Valley View Ct 863-2 Res District 2 18 Candidate $ 35,438 $ 22,371,323 1 5
����� SuRnydale Ln. ���� Sun lh�lley Dr ����� �� Rv,r 864 es �� istri�t�2� ��� 18 ���� Can i� ate ���� 14 t36 ?2�516t6��. 1 5� ����
Mistywood Ln OId North Rd Freedom Ln 618-9 Res District 2 18 Candidate $ 110,167 $ 22,626,855 1 3
public input Scripture St Thornas Hilicres# 817-4 Col Qis#rict 3 18 Candiclate $ 9Qt394 $ 22r717t249 1 3
Thunderbird Dr WestviewTr Crestmeadow 891-7 Col District 3 18 Proposed $ 61,381 $ 22,778,630 $ 7,556,693
t?akland St Administratian Qr Third E 668=2A Col Qis#rict 1 18 Candidate $ 79r801 $ 22r858r43Q 1 2 3
Ave A Hickory W Mulberry W 36 Col District 3 18 Candidate $ 86,863 $ 22,945,293 1
6 0. 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Thunderbird Dr Colonial Dr Glen Garden Dr 891-2 Col District 3 18 Proposed $ 81,272 $ 23,101,438 $ 7,712,838
public input Morse St' Baldvuin Woodrow Ln 5 629-6 Col Qistrict 1 18 Froposed $ 203st142 $ 23,3Q4�48Q $ 7�915�88i1
Oak St W Fulton Mounts Av 660-J8 Sar District 2 18 Candidate $ 220,682 $ 23,525,162 1
����. Weston.Dr Woa�lmn Cr� ���� Bellaire Dr ����� 947-2� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 18 ���� Rropose �St727 23�560�889 7�951�6Q8 ����
Lariat Rd Hampton Dr Lariat Rd 498 Res District 3 18 Proposed $ 269,544 $ 23,830,433 $ 8,221,151
I�orthridge St ����� Hinkle Dr Mesquit� 652 es �� istri�t�2� ��� 18 ���� Can i� ate ���� 14Qt8�9 23�971t272. 1 5 ���� s
Forest St Locust N Fowler Dr 328 Res District 2 18 Candidate $ 85,129 $ 24,056,401 1 5 6
Northwoad TerCace Edgewoad RI ����� North. 65�' � es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 18 ���� Rropose 29r2 :5 24,i185��Z 6. &250�427 ����
Woodson Cir Weston Dr North 998 Res District 1 18 Proposed $ 18,832 $ 24,104,508 $ 8,269,259
I�orthridge St ����� Mesquite Carcall B� N����� 652-2� Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 18 ���� Can i' ate 151�14�' 24,255��Z 1 1 5 ���� 8
public input Scripture removed Hillcrest St Linden Dr Panhandle 413-4 Res District 3 18 Candidate $ 98,515 $ 24,354,166 1
Fshtrap Rd Fislltrap Rd East� 319-7 Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 18 ���� Can i' ate 44r1S4 24,�98,32Q 1 5� ����
Hickory St E Bradshaw N Crawford N 393-9 Col District 1 18 Candidate $ 103,811 $ 24,502,131 1 2 3
G7es�ent St Gaber Malane 245-7 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 18 ���� Can i' ate 7, t114 24,57 t24 ' 1
Stella St Bonnie Brae S Ave H 853 Res District 3 18 Candidate $ 65,243 $ 24,642,488 1 3 5
Greenway Dr� Thunderbird Di� Augusta Dr� ����� 372-A �ol Dis#ri�t�3 �� 19 ����� Rroposed $ 92,277 �� 24,7�Ar765 �� 8��61�5�5-�
Windsor Dr E Broken Bow Branch Crossing 975-JA4 Sar District 2 19 Proposed $ 115,896 $ 24,850,661 $ 8,477,431
Hickory St W ���� Bonnie Brae S����� A�e H: 394 �� ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 19 ���� Can i� ate ���� 154r54Q 25t(1O5��Q1 1 2 3
Windsor Dr E Old Orchard Ln Broken Bow 975-JA3 Sar District 2 19 Proposed $ 199,542 $ 25,204,743 $ 8,676,973
Bright�road Terrace Wilmn�road Di� Longfellow Ln. 1�1 �� es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 19 ���� Can i' ate 96,156. 25t3Q0�899 1 5� ����
Bradshaw St N McKinney E Oak E 121-4 Res District 1 19 Candidate $ 41,072 $ 25,341,971 1 5
I3idgecrest Cir ����� Sauthri�lge Ridgecrest Cir 77i1-7 Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 19 ���� Can i' ate ���� 124r179 25t4�Z6t15Q 1 3
Carroll Blvd N Mimosa Dr Headlee 171-4 Col District 2 19 Candidate $ 57,908 $ 25,524,058 1
Coit St North Westway 2t14 Res � istri�t�2� ��� 19 ���� Can i� ate 19r116. 25t543,174 1 2 ���� s� ����
Brooke St Brooke East 139-C1 Res District 2 19 Candidate $ 4,767 $ 25,547,940 1 5 6
I3idgecrest Cir ����� Rennsyl�rania. ���� Southridge ����� 77il-Fi Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 19 ���� Can i' ate ���� 156,714 25t7Q4t6 5 1 3
Hettie St Davis McKinney E 392-2 Res District 1 19 Proposed $ 52,387 $ 25,757,042 $ 8,729,361
6ayc� St� Wayr�e LatEi�nore 117-f3 Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 19 ���� Can i' ate 4C�224 25t80�,2b6. 1 5
College St E Frame St Vine St 205 Res District 1 19 Candidate $ 57,395 $ 25,860,661 1 3 5 6
publi� i�lput� �� Hinkle Dr� Haggard Ln. Greenbriar� ����� 417-7 �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 19 ����� Candietate $ 195t264 �� 26,055�925 1 ���� 4�
Welch St S Prairie W Highland W 935-5 Sar District 3 19 Candidate $ 124,286 $ 26,180,211 1
Swisher� Rd Shady Stiores ����� Chaparral Dr ����� 867 �� es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 19 ���� Can i' ate ���� 214r316 Z6,394r527 1 5
Lido Way Balboa Ct East 1178-2 Res District 2 19 Candidate $ 31,586 $ 26,426,113 1 3 5 6
Highland St W Ave C A�e A 4Q2-2A Col District 3 19 Candiclate $ 9,,416 $ 26,435�529 1 3
Windsor Dr E Churchill Dr Heather Ln 975-J6 Sar District 2 19 Candidate $ 153,358 $ 26,588,887 1 3
Woadmount Ct����� BumingTree Ln East� 994 es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 19 ���� Can i� ate 29r901 26,618r788 1 3 5
Laredo Ct Santa Fe South 497 Res District 1 19 Proposed $ 17,334 $ 26,636,122 $ 8,746,695
Ldttirttore St Wesf Fer#ai�1. 5(l0 es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 19 ���� Can i� ate 44r�442. 26,680�564 1 5� ����
Windsor Dr E Locust N Inglewood 975 Sar District 2 19 Proposed $ 482,728 $ 27,163,293 $ 9,229,423
Highland Rark.Rd Wi1la�rcrest�Loop Willaw�+road ����� 4Q7-f3 Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 19 ���� Rropose 38,�}24 2,2Q1t716. 9�267,84 ����
Londonderry Ln Kingwood Ct Camden Ct 527-4 Col District 4 19 Proposed $ 80,448 $ 27,282,164 $ 9,348,295
Skylark.Dr� Sandpiper�Dr ���� Fennsyl�rania��� 84Q �� es �� is#ri�t 4���� 19 ���� Can i� ate ���� 22�8�1 2.505�966. 1 3 5
Abbot's Ln Pennsylvania Dr East 1-5 Res District 4 19 Proposed $ 36,113 $ 27,542,078 $ 9,384,407
7 0. 23
Note
Committee
Committee
Proposal
Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Oakland St Sawyer Av Pioneer Cir 668-4 Col District 1 20 Candidate $ 14,595 $ 27,595,097 1 2 3
Monterey Dr Yellowstone PI Sherman Dr E 626-2 Res District 2 20 Proposed $ 69,480 $ 27,767,153 $ 9,492,311
���� Masch.Branch Rtl N Harripton Dr ���� W Uni�€ersity����Dr� 564-7 �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� 20 ���� Rroposed $ ��� 381�11�' � 28r148r2b5 � 9�873s424 ����
Johnson Ln Fort Worth Dr West 468-2 Res District 3 20 Candidate $ 27,494 $ 28,175,759 1 5 6
���� Bentoaks Dr� C7akhurst. Manor Court ��: 84-2. Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 20 ���� Rropose �9,Q50 28r214r8(l� 9�912�4 4����
Wainwright St Sycamore E Prairie E 927 Res District 1 20 Candidate $ 84,359 $ 28,299,167 1 5
Mayhill Rd N Uni+€ersity Dr�E Blagg Rd SZiI �ar �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 20 ���� Can i' ate ���� 350;254 28r649r421 1 ���� 8
Oakland St Locust N Austin 668 Col District 1 20 Candidate $ 72,209 $ 28,721,630 1 2 3
����ory st�E cr���rd �v woa� s ���_� e�i m��ri�t�� ���� zo ������ can�i�ate �� ����� �1ssz�o � zsrs�srsc�o 1 z�
Westway St West Fulton 951 Res District 3 20 Proposed $ 57,299 $ 28,897,158 $ 9,969,772
Colli�ls St1tU Bernard Fea�C. 21L1-5� �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 20 ���� Can i' ate 73t028 28r970�18b. 1 3 5� ����
Masch Branch Rd N N Masch Branch Rd Lovers Ln 564-5 Col District 3 20 Candidate $ 312,595 $ 29,282,780 1 5
Broadt�raySt� RonderA�� Fulton 134-5� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 20 ���� Can i� ate 4 t98�' 2���28,764 1 5
Oak Park Dr Whispering Oaks Timber Trail 1008-2 Res District 1 20 Proposed $ 26,097 $ 29,354,861 $ 9,995,869
���� McKiq�ey St E���� Ruddell S Hettie 581-11 Rar� � is#ri�t�1 ���� 20 ���� Rropose 96,854 29�4 1t715 � 1(T,092�724 ����
Diane Cir Christopher Dr North 266 Res District 1 20 Proposed $ 19,164 $ 29,470,879 $ 10,111,887
Beatt�?St� Fannin. Eagle Dr W����� 76 es � istri�t�3 ��� 20 ���� Can i� ate 57�78(l 2��528,6 9 1 5� ���� ��
Hickory St E Ruddell N Ruddell N 393-J2 Col District 1 20 Candidate $ 29,543 $ 29,558,202 1 2 3
publi�i�lput' 6annieBraeSt�N Creseent. Univetsit�rDr�����W 1�7-1F� Sar� is#ri�t�3 ��� 20 ���� Can i'ate ���� 6Q2,025 3D�160�22Fz 1 ��
Weston Dr Conditt Cr Mockingbird Ln 947-4 Res District 1 20 Proposed $ 37,653 $ 30,197,880 $ 10,149,541
Audra�����Ln. Bayfield Dr Loop 288 N����� 3Q-13 Res �� istri�t�2� ��� 20 ���� Can i� ate ���� 157�1�Z2. 3D��55�041 1 5
Ave C S Chestnut Highland W 44-4W Col District 3 20 Candidate $ 74,151 $ 30,429,192 1
����. Sandy�Creek.Dr ����� Ang�lina Bend�;Dr SaRdy Creek.Dr SQ6. es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 20 ���� Rropose 49,A�0 3D�4 8r642 � 10,198,991 ����
Oakland St Pioneer Cir Texas 668-4A Col District 1 20 Candidate $ 89,452 $ 30,568,094 1 2 3
����. Windsor Dr�E ����� Bell A� �: (?lympia Dr� ���� 9?5-A �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� 20 ���� Rropose ���� 102r6 :2 3D�670�74� � 10,�01�642�����
public input Bonnie Brae St S Louise St W Prairie St 110-4 Sar District 3 20 Candidate $ 114,062 $ 30,784,808 1
Hickory St W ����� Miller A�e D 394-f3 �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 20 ���� Can i' ate 54r945 3D�839r752. 1 2 3
Lynhurst Ln Tennyson Tr Ticonderoga Dr 537-5 Res District 4 20 Proposed $ 42,372 $ 30,882,124 $ 10,344,014
Sauls Cn Green�road Dr Raberts 811 �� es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 21 ���� Can i' ate 99,S�b. 3D�981�6 Q 1 3 5� ����
Rockwood Ln Royal Ln Mistywood Ln 780-2 Res District 2 21 Candidate $ 86,814 $ 31,068,465 1 5
���� Winston Dr Wes�e�e Ct� Waterford Wy 980-2' Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 21 ���� Rropose ���� 124r291 31�192;756. � 10,468,3Q5�����
Bolivar St First Panhandle 106-J7 Col District 2 21 Proposed $ 101,516 $ 31,294,272 $ 10,569,822
Coaper Creek Rd Fislltrap Rd Cit�rlirnits North 222-3 Sar� is#ri�t�2� ��� 21 ���� Can i' ate 192,1�Z 31�4�6t�}�9 1 s� ���
Santa Fe St Phoenix Ct Travis 808-2 Res District 1 21 Proposed $ 37,509 $ 31,523,948 $ 10,607,331
����. Shadov�rTrail ����� Meadow Flum Ha{law���� 824 es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 21 ���� Rropose �31898� 31�557t84' � 1(T,6A1�228 ����
Ave B S Margie Underwood 41-5 Res District 3 21 Candidate $ 60,476 $ 31,618,322 1 2 3
����. Bellerr�ead Dr ����� E�riery Thomas 82 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 21 ���� Rropose ���� 125t479 31�743,SQ1 � 1(T,766,7Q ����
Hickory St W Welch N Bernard 394-J3 Sar District 3 21 Candidate $ 234,523 $ 31,978,323 1 2 3
publi� i�lput� �� 6annie Brae St S Charlotte St ����� Louise St� 11L1-3 �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 21 ���� Can i' ate ���� 111�906 3�0.90,229 1
Southridge Dr Ridgecrest Cr Ridgecrest Cr 847-9 Col District 4 21 Candidate $ 88,157 $ 32,178,387 1
D��isSt� Hett[e lannie 259-5� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 21 ���� Can i� ate 4 t8�9 3�224r225 1 3 5� ����
public input Bonnie Brae St N Scripture Old Bonnie Brae 107-1B Sar District 3 21 Candidate $ 194,392 $ 32,418,618 1 9
����. San lacinta Blvct Colaeado�B�t ����� Finey GYeek Bu SQ2-1N �ar� � is#ri�t�1 ���� 21 ���� Rropose ���� 27�11fl 3�691t728� � 111039�817 ����
Londonderry Ln Camden Ct Westminister 527-5 Col District 4 21 Proposed $ 96,691 $ 32,788,418 $ 11,136,508
B o. 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Hickory St W Ave H Ave G N 394-2 Sar District 3 21 Candidate $ 168,450 $ 33,158,253 1 2 3
E�hcrenix Cf Sartta Fe South End 723 es � istricf 1���� 21 ���� Fropo�ed 14�397 ��172�65Q 11�1501944 ����
Ridgecrest Cir Pennsylvania Southridge 770-9 Res District 4 21 Candidate $ 88,355 $ 33,261,005 1 3
EganSt� Dentan Coit� 297-f3 Res �� istri�t�2� ��� 21 ���� Can i� ate 38;52Q 33�299r525 1 2 3 5
Bradley St Houston PI Oak W 118-4 Res District 3 21 Candidate $ 92,128 $ 33,391,654 1 2 5
����. Coaper Branch St�E La Raloma.Dr ���� Bra�ch Crossing� 22i1-�} Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 21 ���� Rropose 59r225 33�4 0�87k3 11;210�129 ����
Windsor Dr E Inglewood Cedar Hill 975-2 Sar District 2 21 Proposed $ 148,217 $ 33,599,096 $ 11,358,346
Wye�t� Indus#rial Coak. 1(101-2� Res � is#ri�t�1 21 ���� Can i� ate 34r524 33�6�3r61� 1 3 5
Mulberry St W Ave A Welch S 635-3 Col District 3 21 Candidate $ 135,708 $ 33,769,327 1
Grana�la Trail ����� SeviUe Rd Ryaa� Rd E 366-3 Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 21 ���� Rropose 1�St2Q5 33�9Q4i532. 111493�552� ����
North Texas Blvd Sycamore W Edwards 50-4 Sar District 3 21 Candidate $ 72,680 $ 33,977,212 1
I�orth���Te�eas Blvd Ed�+rards Chestnut� 50-5 �ar� � istri�t�3 ��� 21 ���� Can i� ate 87:146. 34,06Ar358� 1 3
Cindy Ln Tieszen St Hampton Dr 200 Res District 3 22 Candidate $ 143,680 $ 34,208,038 1 5
���� 6arraw Dr� Darby Ln. Westgate Dr ���� 70-2. Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 22' ���� Rropose 5810�5 34.266t10 ; � 111551�620 ����
McKinney St E Hettie Jannie 581-J2 Par District 1 22 Proposed $ 138,467 $ 34,404,573 $ 11,690,087
Fanhandle St� ���� Hillcrest� Ector� 699-A �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� 22� ����� Candietate $ 143t594 �� 34,548r167 1 3
Sunset St Anna Bolivar 865-4 Res District 2 22 Candidate $ 45,839 $ 34,594,006 1 5
����. Choc#aw A�e ����� Red�Yoad RI ����� Shai�rnee 196-3 Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 22� ���� Rropose 4 tA�4 34.6�9r460 � 11;735t541 ����
Hill Alley Martin Wilson 2059 Res District 1 22 Proposed $ 21,186 $ 34,660,646 $ 11,756,727
Windsor Dr�E ����� Cedar�Hill Be11'�A�N 9?5-3 �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� 22� ���� Rropose 14C�7 7 34,80 �42�' � 111903s504 ����
public input Bernard St Prairie W Highland W 87-5 Col District 3 22 Candidate $ 64,382 $ 34,871,805 1 2
����. Car�tbri�lge Ln ��� We11i�1gtan Dr��� (?xfard Ln 156. es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 22� ���� Rropose ���� 116,619 34.988,42� � 12t020�123 ����
Stella St Ave F North Texas Bv 853-4 Res District 3 22 Candidate $ 69,480 $ 35,057,905 1 3 5
(?akland St Research Cir� ���� Sau�yer A� 668=3A Col Dis#ri�t�1 ���� 22� ����� Candietate $ 7k3;8S9 �� 35t1�6t764 1 2 3
Texas St Rose Crawford N 887-5 Res District 1 22 Candidate $ 129,668 $ 35,266,432 1
Hickory St�E Woa�l S Ruddell N 39�=11 Col Dis#ri�t�1 ���� 22� ����� Candietate $ 76,387 �� 35t342�819 1 2 3
Ave B S Fannin Margie 41-4 Res District 3 22 Candidate $ 31,972 $ 35,374,791 1 2
G7eek:A�te Boyd Redwoad FI ����� 244-2� Res � is#ri�t�1 ���� 22� ���� Can i' ate 42r372 35t417t16�' 1 5� ����
Mistywood Ln Craig Ln East 618-J2 Res District 2 22 Candidate $ 29,034 $ 35,446,197 1 3
G7es�2nt St Coit.���� Car[all B� N����� 245-13 �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 22� ����� Candietate $ 72,7�9 �� 35t518r9�6. 1
public input Hinkle Dr Meadow Ridge Haggard Ln 417-6 Col District 2 22 Candidate $ 86,510 $ 35,605,445 1 4
Redstane Rd Atlas Dr Titan Tr 764-5� Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 22� ���� Can i� ate �7�750 35t643,195 1 5� ����
Cardinal Dr Hummingbird Ln Bob-O-Link Ln 165-6 Col District 2 22 Candidate $ 70,149 $ 35,713,344 1
����. Thunderbird Dr ����� Glen����.Garden Dr Greenway Dr����� 891-3 �ol Distri�t�3 ��� 22� ����� Rroposed $ ����� 82r5Q8 �� 35ti95�852. �� 12t102;6�1 �����
Industrial St Mill South 446-5 Res District 1 22 Candidate $ 31,346 $ 35,827,197 1 2 3
����. Carnppell Ln. Char{es Woadford Ln�: 16Q-2� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 22� ���� Rropose 4Qt540 3St8b7�788 � 12t143�221 ����
Kings Row Loop 288 N Deerwood Pw 487-JS Col District 2 22 Proposed $ 129,470 $ 35,997,258 $ 12,272,691
DentonSt� Creseent. Fanhandle ���� 2b�� � es �� istri�t�2� ��� 23 ���� Can i� ate 19�1�0 3�190,387 1 2 3 5
Jim Christal Rd W Oak St S Masch Branch Rd 461-2 Sar District 3 23 Candidate $ 1,233,539 $ 37,423,926 1 5
���� Rockwoad Ln ���� Mi�t�rwoad Ln ���� Laurelwoad Dr 780-3 Res � is#ri�t�2' ��� 23 ���� Rropose 4�524 37,4 1 A5Q � 12t�20�215�����
Granada Trail Montecito Rd Montecito Rd 366 Res District 4 23 Candidate $ 175,892 $ 37,647,342 1 5
Moncaya Dr Cordova Cr Coronada Dr����� 622 es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 23 ���� Can i' ate 56,7�5 37,7Q4t111 1 5� ����
Oakland St Third E Research Cir 668-3 Col District 1 23 Candidate $ 94,395 $ 37,798,506 1 2 3
9 0. 23
Note
Committee
Committee Proposal
Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Wilderness St Kenwood Timber Ridge Cr 957 Res District 1 23 Proposed $ 109,782 $ 38,329,033 $ 12,850,742
Exposition St N Oak E Hickory E 308 Res District 1 23 Candidate $ 38,520 $ 38,495,728 1 6
����� A�e o������ Mapie E�le Qr w����� �+7 s �o� ois�ri�t�3 ��� z3 ������ candidate $� ����� 14ot71il � 38r6�st�+3� 1
public input Hinkle Dr Greenbriar Tulane Dr 417-8 Col District 2 23 Candidate $ 97,750 $ 38,734,188 1 4
Ruddell St N Davis Davis 789-9 Col District 1 23 Candidate $ 63,069 $ 38,821,140
Southridge Dr Ridgecrest Cr Pennsylvania
Chestnut St Ave D
Masch Branch Rd N UU Uni
Highland St W Ave D
Ave C S
Ave C S
847-7 Col District 4 23 Candidate $ 147,007 $ 39,123,040
190-2 Res District 3 23 Candidate $ 84,118 $ 39,570,643
402-2 Col District 3 23 Proposed $ 167,995 $ 40,276,115 $ 13,146,912
1 2 3
1
1
Mistywood Ln Freedom Ln Liberty Ln 618-J Res District 2 23 Candidate $ 42,902 $ 40,359,035 1 3
publi� i�lput� �� Alice St� Creseent. Fanhandle ���� 12-Cz Res � istri�t�2� ��� 23 ���� Can i� ate ���� 242r3�9 � Ail�6Q1t374 1
Windbrook Ct Windbrook North 972 Res District 2 23 Candidate $ 14,638 $ 40,616,011 1 3 5 6
����. Bri�rcliff Dr Brighton Dr ����� Regal Dr� 128� es �� is#ri�t 4���� 23 ���� Rropose ���� 144r98(l � Ai1�760�991 � 1�291�892�����
Oakhurst St Bentoaks Dr Bentoaks Dr 666-2 Res District 4 23 Proposed $ 78,725 $ 40,839,716 $ 13,370,617
Fergumn St� Locus# N Elrn N 317 es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 23 ���� Can i� ate 50�991 � Ai?�890�70 ; 1 5� ����
Longmeadow Ct West Mack Dr 529 Res District 1 23 Candidate $ 50,220 $ 40,940,928 1 5 6
Windsor Dr�E ����� Croydan.Ln Churchill Dr� ����� 9?5-15� �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� 24 ���� Can i' ate 112,3Z3� � A1�0 3r251 1
Ave D Hickory W Mulberry W 47 Col District 3 24 Candidate $ 102,105 $ 41,155,356 1 3
����. Regal Dr� 135 E Bri�rcliff Dr ����� 767 es �� is#ri�t 4���� 24 ���� Rropose 7�57fl � A1�7�2�925 � 1�44�,187 ����
Denton St Oak W Hickory W 263-8 Res District 2 24 Candidate $ 48,391 $ 41,281,316 1 2 3 5
����� 6o��vaxst. Third W crescent� 1�c-14 �o� oistri�t�z� ��� z4 ������ Rroposed $ �3167s �� A1��14r991 �� 1�;4s1,sbz������
Hollyhill Ln Londonderry Woodbrook 422-8 Res District 4 24 Candidate $ 53,687 $ 41,368,678 1 3
Walnut St E Locus# S Austin. 928� es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 24 ���� Can i� ate 24r5Q8 � A1��93r187 1 ��
Jamestown Ln Williamsburg Rw Mistywood Ln 456-3 Res District 2 24 Candidate $ 43,672 $ 41,436,859 1 3 5
Fierce�St� Highland W ���� Ma�le 726-3 Res � is#ri�t�1 24 ���� Can i� ate 42r228 � A1�4 9r086. 1 5� ����
Huntington Dr Hercules Ln Sun Valley Dr 428 Res District 2 24 Candidate $ 45,454 $ 41,524,540 1 2 5 6
cardi�ia� Dr Woo�+thrush Ln (?rib�e Ln 16s-A �o� Distri�t�z� ��� z4 ������ candietate $ 6s;97z. �� A1�ss3rslz. 1 z ������
public input Bernard St Chestnut Prairie W 87-4 Col District 3 24 Candidate $ 51,965 $ 41,645,477 1 2 3
Woadbroak St� ����� Hallyhill Ln. Southridge ����� 988=2� Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 24 ���� Can i' ate 76,414 � A1�721�891 1 5
Brandywine St Misty Hollow Copper Ridge 125-2 Res District 2 24 Proposed $ 32,598 $ 41,754,488 $ 13,514,460
Allise Cir Cristopher Dr� ����� North. 14 �� es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 24 ���� Can i' ate 19r26Q � A1�7 3r74� 1 5� ����
Industrial St Sycamore E Bell Av E 446-3 Res District 1 24 Candidate $ 61,632 $ 41,835,380 1
HickorySt W ���� A�e F Fouts 394-5� �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 24 ���� Can i� ate ���� 119rtlOQ � A1�954r380 1 2 3
Buckingham Dr Sheraton PI Imperial Dr 149-5 Res District 2 24 Candidate $ 58,165 $ 42,012,545 1 3 5
Sheru,�oad St� Shady�+road ����� Mirt�?�road ����� 834-2� Res � is#ri�t�2� ��� 24 ���� Can i' ate 44r298� � A=Z;O 6t843� 1 3 5� ����
Blackford Oakes Oakshire South 1184-2 Res District 2 24 Candidate $ 28,746 $ 42,085,589 1 2 5 6
Hercules Ln Titan Tr
lames St Masseyj
Houston PI Bradley
Atlas Dr
Marietta
390-3N2 Col District 2 24 Candidate $ 61,910 $ 42,307,983
424-3 Res District 3 24 Candidate $ 83,059 $ 42,702,524
10 or 23
1 3
1 3 5
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Retama St Huisache Sagebrush Dr 768 Res District 2 24 Candidate $ 57,636 $ 42,792,902 1 2 5
Mesquit� St' Headlee� Strata Dt 598 5� Res � istricf 2��� 24 ���� Candidate� 81�807 42�874�70.4 1 5
Stanley St Panhandle South 851-4 Res District 3 24 Candidate $ 14,397 $ 42,889,106 1 5
Campbell Ln. Woa�tford Ln ����� Mc�nney E���� 16Q-3 Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 24 ���� Can i' ate 7�666. A=Z;966t771 1 5� ����
Lynhurst Ln Pennsylvania Tennyson Tr 537-4 Res District 4 24 Candidate $ 45,839 $ 43,012,610 1 3 5 6
ChestnutSt We1chS Bernard 19Q-5� Res �� istri�t�3 ��� 25� ���� Can i� ate ���� 116,716 A3�129r32Fz 1
Cherokee Ave Boyd Redwood PI 188 Res District 1 25 Proposed $ 13,386 $ 43,142,712 $ 13,560,587
����. Deni3on St. Shertnan Dr�tN Univetsit�r Dr�����W 262-A Res � is#ri�t�2� ��� 25� ���� Rropose 61�391 43�2Q4t10�' 1�;621,978 ���
Montecito Rd Granada Tr Santiago PI 624-4 Col District 4 25 Candidate $ 69,620 $ 43,273,722 1 2
Sa�€annah Trail ���� Longridge Dr� ���� Whitney Ct. ���� 812-3 Res � is#ri�t 4���� 25 ����� Can i� ate 64r184 A3��37t9Q6. 1 5� ����
Sagewood St Plum Hollow Willow Stone 798-2 Res District 2 25 Candidate $ 35,968 $ 43,373,874 1 3 5 6
Angelina.Bend Dr� San Gabri�l Dr� Sandy Creek. ����� 19 Res �� istri�t�1 ���� 25 ����� Can i� ate 59r51�� � 43�433r388� 1 5� ����
Kingswood Ct Londonderry South 489 Res District 4 25 Candidate $ 17,575 $ 43,450,963 1 2 5 6
WayneSt� Boyd W Bo�ad E 9�2-2� Res � istri�t�1 ���� 25� ���� Can i� ate 6,�404 � 43�4 7t366. 1 5
Ave C S Sycamore W Chestnut 44-3W Col District 3 25 Candidate $ 71,562 $ 43,528,928 1
����� FanhandleSt� ���� Fultan. Amarillo� 699-11 �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 25� ����� Candidate $ ����� 61�7�4 �� 43�590,662 1 3
Cherokee Ave Redwood PI Shawnee 188-2 Res District 1 25 Proposed $ 45,598 $ 43,636,260 $ 13,667,577
����. Hercules Ln. Meadow Lane�I Redstane Rd ����� 39Q-2� �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 25� ����� Rroposed $ 12Qt878� �� 43�757t138 �� 1�;788,454 �����
Cardinal Dr Bob-O-Link Ln Woodthrush Ln 165-5 Col District 2 25 Candidate $ 68,737 $ 43,825,874 1
HickorySt W Dentan Williarns 394-15� �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 25� ���� Can i' ate 84r921 � 43�910�795 1 2 3
Santa Monica Dr Hobson Ln E EI Paseo E 809 Res District 4 25 Proposed $ 458,088 $ 44,368,883 $ 14,246,543
Mayhill Rd N Blagg�Rd Frominence Farkwa� 57a-2� Sar � is#ri�t�2� ��� 25� ���� Can i� ate 98;1�5 ��44�4�Z7t018� 1 ���� s
Michial St Knight McCormick 600 Res District 4 25 Candidate $ 92,978 $ 44,559,996 1 3 5
(?akland St Austin Adminis#ration Dr 668=2� Col Dis#ri�t�1 ����� 25� ����� Candietate $ ����� 122,879 �� A4�682:875 1 2 3
College St W Bolivar Public Alley A106-J3 206 Res District 2 25 Candidate $ 23,256 $ 44,706,131 1
Windsor Dr�W ����� Windsar�Farms Car[iage Hill ���� 9i6. � ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 25� ���� Can i' ate ���� 1(1817 6 ��44�814r9(l8� 1
Congress St W Denton Coit 216-8 Col District 2 25 Candidate $ 59,439 $ 44,874,346 1
Strata�����Dr� Mesquite Car[all B� N����� 857 �� es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 25� ���� Can i' ate ���� 155t2�6 � AStQ29r582. 1 5
Greenway Dr Brookhollow Dr Lakewood Dr 372-2 Res District 3 25 Candidate $ 40,590 $ 45,070,172 1 5 6
publi� i�lput� �� Bernard St� Greenlee Lindsey 8711 �ol Distri�t�3 ��� 25� ����� Candietate $ ����� 222r6�0 �� ASt292;8Q2 1
Thunderbird Dr Carriage Hill Brooklake 891-5 Col District 3 25 Proposed $ 73,327 $ 45,366,129 $ 14,319,870
Broadt�raySt� Bryat� FonderA� ����� 134-A Res � is#ri�t�3 ��� 25� ���� Can i� ate ���� 115t416 � ASt4�1�544 1 5
Mulberry St E Crawford S Wood S 633-5 Res District 1 25 Candidate $ 42,613 $ 45,524,157 1
Tom Cole Rd Mas�h Branch �d C.laUolfe Rd ���� 896-A Res � is#ri�t�3 ��� 25� ���� Can i� ate ���� 567�785 ��C�0.91t942. 1 5
Wellington Dr Pickwick Ln Cambridge Ln 940-6 Res District 2 25 Candidate $ 37,364 $ 46,129,306 1 3 5
6ayc� St� Creek A�� Chocta�rA�� ���� 117-3 Res �� is#ri�t�1 25� ���� Can i' ate 4�38(l � AC�176t6�6. 1 5
Freedom Ln Emerson Ln Chebi Ln 341 Res District 2 25 Candidate $ 57,010 $ 46,233,695 1 5 6
Panhandle St� ���� Bonnie Brae N; Star�ley 699 �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� 25� ����� Candidate $ 97,A�6. �� A�,331�151 1 2 3
Dover Dr Sherman Dr E Heather Ln 271 Res District 2 25 Candidate $ 28,120 $ 46,359,271 1 5 6
FaisleySt. Frarne Ras� 695 �ol Dis#ri�t�1 ���� 25� ����� Candidate $ 99,1Q3� �� A�,458r374 1 2 ����
Golf Ct Wisteria West 363 Res District 4 25 Candidate $ 60,476 $ 46,518,850 1 3 5 6
publi� i�lput� �� Scripture St� Bonnie Brae N; (?Id��:6annie Brae 817-2� �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� 25� ����� Candietate $ 49,669 �� AC�568,52Q 1 3
Ave G S Louise Prairie W 58-4 Res District 3 25 Candidate $ 47,139 $ 46,615,659 1
11 or 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Montecito Rd EI Paseo E San Sebastian PI 624-2 Col District 4 25 Candidate $ 82,390 $ 46,835,758 1 2
Ryan Rd E Overlake Dr Teasley Ln 794-J1 Sar District 4 25 Candidate $ 118,931 $ 47,043,429 1 9
Cardi�ial Dr King�isher�Ln. �� North Dead E�d 165 es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 25� ���� Can i' ate 4�2�5 A7,0.90,664 1 5
Uland St Frame Rose 912-2 Res District 1 25 Candidate $ 62,017 $ 47,152,681 1 3 5 6
Kenwood St Deer Tr Wilderness
Wayne St Boyd E Snyder
Linden Dr Hillcrest Ector
Congress St 1AI ���� Lo�€e11 Bryan.
Ross St Denison Bolivar
Mounts A�e Andetson. Ha�es Dr� '��
Shawnee St Choctaw Av Mingo Rd
479-2 Res District 1 25 Candidate $ 35,198 $ 47,288,946
9�2-3 Res �� istri�t�1 ���� 25� ���� Can i� ate 44r5�9 A7,�3�A84
512-4 Res District 3 25 Proposed $ 73,958 $ 47,407,443 $ 14,393,828
216-2� Res �� istri�t�3 ��� 25� ���� Can i� ate 4C�994 A7,4 4r437
785-2 Res District 2 25 Candidate $ 45,598 $ 47,500,035
6�1-2� Res �� istri�t�2� ��� 25� ���� Can i� ate 4�;t10�Z A7,548r041
828-5 Res District 1 25 Candidate $ 71,262 $ 47,619,303
1 5 6
1 5
1
1 5 6
1 5 �
1 5 6
Bishops Park St Pennsylvania Dr East 96 Res District 4 26 Candidate $ 36,353 $ 47,732,985 1 3 5 6
McCc�erni�k St� ��� Eagle Dr�W Fannin 57�� es �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 26 ���� Can i� ate 6Qttl�1 � A7,i93r076. 1
Longmeadow St Doubleoak North 530-4 Res District 1 26 Candidate $ 38,905 $ 47,831,981 1 5 6
Windsor Dr�E ����� Hano�er Dr Cro�!don Ln. ���� 9?5-14 �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� 26 ���� Can i� ate ���� 22�;395 � A�,O 5�376. 1 2 ����
Hollyhill Ln Lafayette Dr Southridge 422-J4 Res District 4 26 Candidate $ 79,977 $ 48,135,353 1 3
Christopher Dr� ����� Race�����Dr Allise GY� 197 es �� istri�t�1 ���� 26 ���� Can i� ate 54r1F9 � 4�,189r522 1 5� ����
Daniel St Fort Worth Dr East 254 Res District 3 26 Candidate $ 113,104 $ 48,302,626 1 3 5 6 9
���� Wessex�Ct. Waterford Wy���� Wi�lston Dr ���� 942-2' Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 26 ���� Rropose 94r7S9 � A�,�97�385 � 14r488,588 ����
Highland St W loof Carroll Bv S 402-8 Res District 3 26 Candidate $ 117,101 $ 48,514,486 1
HuisacheSt� Yucca.Dr Retama 426-2� Res �� istri�t�2� ��� 26 ���� Can i� ate �6,7�8 � 4�,551t225 1 2 ���� s� ����
Congress St W Bolivar Elm N 216-J1 Col District 2 26 Candidate $ 87,687 $ 48,638,911 1
���� Lakevi:ev�r Blvd ����� Rodeo Dr� S Tr,init� Rd ����� 1426-Fi �ar� istri�t�2� ��� 26 ���� Can i� ate ���� 225t529 � A�,8bAr440 1 �����
Oakshire St Misty Hollow Blackford Oakes 672-6 Res District 2 26 Candidate $ 26,964 $ 48,891,404 1 5 6
(?lyrmpia Dr� Wolftrap Dr� ����� Wi�ldmr E 6�b-2� Res � is#ri�t�2� ��� 26 ���� Can i' ate 88;596. � A�,980�0(lQ 1 5� ���
Chebi Ln Freedom Ln Old North Rd 187 Res District 2 26 Candidate $ 115,319 $ 49,095,319 1 5 6
HeatherLn Dover Dr Avon Dr 386-2 Res District 2 26 Candidate $ 144,065 $ 49,269,670 1 3 5 6
Stuart Rd Wolftrap Dr Windsor E 860-JS Col District 2 26 Candidate $ 149,361 $ 49,519,114 1
Cooper Branch St E Chaparral Ct La Paloma Dr 220-3 Res District 2 26 Candidate $ 39,435 $ 49,604,773 1 5 6
����. Windsor Dr�E ����� Sherinan Dr�E ��� Wilsonwoad Dr 9?5-9 �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� 26 ���� Rropose 97�972. � A��7Q2;74' � 14r586,560 ����
Windsor Dr E Longfellow Ln Glenwood Ln 975-J1 Sar District 2 26 Proposed $ 40,889 $ 49,743,634 $ 14,627,449
Foxcroft Cir Archer Tr Alley 337-3 Res District 2 26 Candidate $ 135,350 $ 50,130,067 1 5
BenjimanSt. layce Ln. Broake 8�' Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 26 ���� Can i� ate 98;611 50�228,6 k�� 1 5� ����
Welch St S Sycamore W Chestnut 935-3 Sar District 3 26 Candidate $ 139,100 $ 50,367,778 1
Hollyhill Ln Longridge Dr Pennsylvania 422-J Res District 4 26 Candidate $ 97,215 $ 50,580,574 1 3
Carriage Hill Broakhollow Dr� Lakev�road Dr� 17i1-3 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 26 ���� Can i' ate 44r298� � 50�624r872. 1 5� ����
Joyce Ln Gardenview Gabe Ct 472-2 Col District 2 26 Candidate $ 65,853 $ 50,690,725 1
12 or 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Ridgecrest Cir Ridgecrest Cir Pennsylvania 770-8 Res District 4 26 Candidate $ 101,693 $ 50,843,029 1 3
Augusta Dr� Greenway Dr� ���� Easf . �1 2 Res �� istricf ���� 26 ���� Candidate� 41�A5� 501884�4�b'. 1 5 6 ����
public input Morse St Newton Baldwin 629-5 Col District 1 26 Proposed $ 196,525 $ 51,081,011 $ 15,075,057
Bellaire Dr Montclair:Rl ����� Mc�nney E���� 81-3' Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 26 ���� Can i' ate ���� 1i19r782. 51�190,79�' 1 5
Navajo St Mohican Av Nevada 642 Res District 1 26 Candidate $ 42,131 $ 51,232,924 1 5 6
t?aklartd St UUithers Marshall 668=7 Col Qis#rict 1 26 Candiclate $ 9St8(l8 $ 51�328,732. 1 2 3
Maple St Elm S Locust S 549-J3 Res District 1 26 Candidate $ 51,087 $ 51,379,819 1 2 3 5
����. Windsor Dr�E ����� Nottirlgharn Di� Burni�lgTree Ln. 9?5-lA Sar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� 26 ���� Rropose ���� 16(1t671 51�54L1��}9Q 15�235t728 ����
public input Greenwood Dr Preston PI Sauls Ln 373-2 Col District 2 26 Candidate $ 55,554 $ 51,596,045 1 3
6oyc�St� CherokeeA�� ����� Cre�kA�t 117-2� Res � istri�t�1 ���� 26 ���� Can i� ate 64r714 51�660�758� 1 3 5
Mulberry St W Bernard Carroll Bv S 635-5 Col District 3 26 Candidate $ 316,319 $ 51,977,077 1 4
���� Hanover Dr� Windsar�E Cro�!don Ln. ���� 382. �� es �� is#ri�t�2' ��� 26 ���� Rropose 57�654 � 52;O�Ar761 � 15�293�412'����
Windfields St Windstream West 974 Res District 2 26 Candidate $ 55,613 $ 52,090,374 1 5 6
G7estrneadav�rS#. Wesf�+rard Thunderbird Dr 246-5� Col Dis#ri�t�3 ��� 26 ����� Candietate $ ����� 1�SttlQ2. �� 52;225�376. 1 5� �����
Oakwood Dr Westwood Dr Mercedes Rd 674-3 Res District 4 26 Candidate $ 38,520 $ 52,263,896 1 3 5
abandaned for parking lot� GYa�rford St N: ��� Te�eas Faisley 242. � es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 26 ���� Can i' ate ���� 1181112 � 52;382�0(l8� 1 5� ����
Cordova Cir Bell Av N Moncayo Dr 233 Res District 2 26 Candidate $ 41,746 $ 52,423,754 1 5
Sunset St Uni+€ersit�? Dr�1kU Ali�e 865 es � is#ri�t�2� ��� 26 ���� Can i' ate 84r744 � 52;508,498 1
Hickory St W Ave B N Fry 394-J1 Sar District 3 27 Candidate $ 143,482 $ 52,651,980 1 2 3
publi� i�lput� �� Bell A�e N C?1d Main Gl�� ����� Schmita A�� ���� 781�A �ol Distri�t�1 ���� 27 ����� Candietate $ ����� 112,874 �� 52;76Ar854 1 3
Windsor Dr E Stuart Rd Blue Bonnet PI 975-7 Sar District 2 27 Candidate $ 325,981 $ 53,090,835 1
publi� i�lput� �� Mist�?woad Ln ����� Rocki++road Ln. ���� lamestawn Ln 618=6 Res � is#ri�t�2� ��� 27 ���� Can i� ate 44rQ57 � 53�1��r892 1 3
Bellaire Dr Weston Dr Bob-O-Link Ln 81 Res District 1 27 Candidate $ 100,008 $ 53,234,900 1 3 5
Westminster Ct���� Londonderry ����� Dead End 2Q57 Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 27 ���� Can i' ate 27�2Q5 � 53�262�1(l4 1 5� ����
Denton St Congress W Parkway W 263-4 Res District 2 27 Candidate $ 50,076 $ 53,312,180 1 2 3 5
Manhattan Dr� ��� Monterey Dr� ����� Carisbad RI ����� 545-2� Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 27 ���� Can i' ate 4r2�7 � 53��16t�}17 1 5
Ponder Ave Linden Dr Broadway 739-2 Res District 3 27 Candidate $ 46,224 $ 53,362,641 1 2 3 5 6
Ye11ov,�tane FI ����� Imperial Dr� �� Ct� 1(l02 3 Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 27 ���� Can i� ate 41�072. � 53�4Q�,71�' 1 3 5
Ave C S Highland W Maple 44-SE Col District 3 27 Candidate $ 36,428 $ 53,440,142 1
TCavis St� Hapkins Dr� Fiping Roc�C.Ln. 9QQ-2� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 27 ���� Can i� ate 4 t598� � 53�4�5�74Q 1 3 5� ����
Minor Cir Kerley North 614 Res District 1 27 Candidate $ 33,753 $ 53,519,493 1 5 6
Montecito Rd ����� Sant[ago�Rl Granada Tr ����� 624-5 � �ol Dis#ri�t 4���� 27 ���� Candietate $ 85t5Q9 �� 53�6Q5�OQ2 1 2 ����
public input Scripture removed Emery St Alice Coit 304-J1 Res District 2 27 Candidate $ 87,440 $ 53,692,442 1
Brand�?wine Gl� ��� Bran�ly+�rine ����� South 124 �� es �� istri�t�2� ��� 27 ���� Can i� ate �9,2�0 � 53�7�1t7�3� 1 5� ����
Winston Dr State School Rd Wessex Ct 980 Res District 4 27 Candidate $ 29,901 $ 53,761,634 1 5 6
College Fark Dr����� Reach. Fov;�ler�Dr 2Q7 �� es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 27 ���� Can i� ate 76,029 � 53�837t66�' 1 3 5� ����
Hickory St W Fouts North Texas Bv 394-6 Sar District 3 27 Candidate $ 38,948 $ 53,876,611 1 2 3
����. Windsor Dr�W ����� Rine� Rd Mesquit� 9i6-12� �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� 27 ���� Rropose ���� 285t348� � 54.161�958� � 15,578r7 9����
Market St Loop 288 N Blake St 559 Col District 2 27 Candidate $ 299,193 $ 54,461,152 1
B�ckingharn Dr����� Williams Sheratan.Fl ���� 149-A Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 27 ���� Can i' ate 19,�4Q4 � 54,4�0�556. 1 5� ����
public input Bell Ave N University Dr E Chapel Dr 78-J7 Col District 1 27 Candidate $ 173,961 $ 54,654,517 1
Mist�?woad Ln ����� Liberty Ln. Cralg �1 6?�=11 Res � is#ri�t�2� ��� 27 ���� Can i� ate 43t383� � 54,697�9(l0 1 3
public input Bernard St Maple Eagle Dr W 87-7 Col District 3 27 Candidate $ 96,279 $ 54,794,178 1 2
13 or 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Broken Bow St Windsor E Dunes 137-2 Res District 2 27 Candidate $ 72,947 $ 54,913,350 1 5 6
loyce Ln Benjiman. Elm N 47Z-4 Col District 2 27 Candidate $ 17Qt724 $ S5t(l8�}t074 1
Edwards Rd Private Dr Swisher Rd 292-4B Col District 2 27 Candidate $ 175,255 $ 55,259,329 1 5 6 9
publi� i�lput� �� 6annie Brae St S W Frairie St� ����� 135€ S 11L1-5 � �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 27 ���� Can i� ate ���� 154r888 SSt414r217 1 3
Ave C S Maple Eagle Dr W 44-6E Col District 3 27 Candidate $ 49,552 $ 55,463,768 1
Malane St Amh�rst Universit�r W����� 544-7 �ol Distri�t�3 ��� 27 ����� Candidate $� ����� 198;SQ1 � SSt662;269 1
Panhandle St Amarillo Alice 699-J2 Col District 2 27 Candidate $ 100,987 $ 55,763,256 1 3
Woadbroak St� ����� Longridge Dr� ���� Fennsyl�rania��� 988=Fi Res �� is#ri�t 4���� 27 ���� Can i� ate ���� 112,864 SSt876t12Q 1 5
Casie Ct Brooke Beth 173-2 Res District 2 27 Candidate $ 56,865 $ 55,932,985 1 3 5 6
Hickory St W ����� Williams Car[all B� N����� 394-16 �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 27 ���� Can i' ate 69,2 �2. 56,(102;257 1 2 3
Gober St Crescent Carlton 362-2 Res District 3 27 Candidate $ 44,154 $ 56,046,410 1 5 6
Eagle Dr W loaf ���� Cleveland 2�0-15� Sar� � istri�t�3 ��� 27 ���� Can i� ate ���� 225t96�� 56,272;37k�� 1 ��
Montecito Rd San Sebastian Pl Granada Tr 624-3 Col District 4 27 Candidate $ 12,829 $ 56,285,207 1 2
publi� i�lput� ����� Mocki�gbird Ln��: Westan Dr� (?rible Ln 62i1-13 �ol Dis#ri�t�1 ���� 27 ����� Candietate $ 1(181�}02. �� 56,393r6(l9 1
Congress St W Mounts Av Alice 216-6 Col District 2 28 Candidate $ 26,306 $ 56,419,915 1
McCc�erni�k St� ��� Margie Unc�erwoad ����� 57�=2� Res � istri�t�3 ��� 28 ���� Can i� ate 5819�6. � 56,4 sr851 1
Briarwood St Oakshire Brandywine 126 Res District 2 28 Candidate $ 63,317 $ 56,542,168 1 5 6
Congress St W���� RonderA�� Fulton 216-3 �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 28 ����� Candietate $ 7Qt443� �� 56,612;611 1
Highland Park Rd Wisteria Laurel 407-5 Res District 4 28 Candidate $ 169,247 $ 56,781,859 1 5
���� Ste11a St. ��te G S A�e F� $5�=3 Res � is#ri�t'3 ��� 28 ���� Can i� ate 4 tA�4 � 56,827t312. 1 3 5
Oaktree Dr West Autumn Oak Dr 663 Res District 1 28 Candidate $ 20,030 $ 56,847,343 1 5 6
6annie Brae St�N Rrivate Dr� Riney Rd 1�7-3A Sar� �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 28 ���� Can i� ate ���� 284r877 � 57,1�2�219 1 ��
Hickory St W Ave D Ave C N 394-9 Sar District 3 28 Candidate $ 155,792 $ 57,288,011 1 2 3
Lee Dr� Audra Ln Bult Run 50�' � es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 28 ���� Can i' ate 59r70�Z � 57 34 t717 1 3 5� ����
Londonderry Ln Sam Bass Bv Jason Dr 527 Col District 4 28 Candidate $ 328,265 $ 57,675,983 1 6
����. BalivaxSt. Creseent. Se�ond 1�6-15� �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 28 ����� Rroposed $ 54r2S8 �� 57,7�0,240 �� 15�633�017 ����
College Park Dr Fowler Dr East 207-2 Res District 2 28 Candidate $ 34,042 $ 57,764,282 1 3 5 6
����. Fonder A�e Broa�l�+ray Fanhandle ���� 7�9-3 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 28 ���� Rropose 4�,6Q9 � 57,810�891 � 15�679�626 ����
Ponder Ave Scripture Grace Temple Av 739-7 Res District 3 28 Candidate $ 62,162 $ 57,873,053 1 2 3 5 6
DotmnSt. Fart 1tUorth.Dr ��� East� 268 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 28 ���� Can i' ate 68 951 � 57 942�0(l4 1 2 3 5
Eden Ln Edinburg Ln North 288 Res District 2 28 Candidate $ 21,330 $ 57,963,334 1 5 6
����. Hamptan Dr� Lariat Rd N: Masch Branch Rd 380-3 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 28 ���� Rropose ���� 255t7 �;�' � SSr219r10 � 15�935t399 ����
Hercules Ln Picadilly Ln Sherman Dr E 390-J2 Col District 2 28 Candidate $ 43,961 $ 58,263,068 1
Hallurn Dr� Raisley North. 1871 Res � is#ri�t�2� ��� 28 ���� Can i� ate 14r878� � SSr27 t94�Z 1 5� ����
Solar Way Bonnie Brae S West 844 Res District 4 28 Candidate $ 119,027 $ 58,396,973 1 5 6
Emersnn Ln. Willsonwoad Dr Frivate Dr 3Q�' �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 28 ����� Candietate $ 281�}25 �� SSr425�398 1 5� �����
public input Hinkle Dr Mimosa Dr Headlee 417-4 Col District 2 28 Candidate $ 86,510 $ 58,511,907 1 4
����� Belha�ien St. Georgetown Dir� Fordharn Ln �� 77 es �� istri�t�3 ��� 28 ���� Can i� ate 40t540 � SSr552;49$ 1 5� ����
Carroll Blvd N Northridge Magnolia 171-2 Col District 2 28 Proposed $ 71,562 $ 58,624,059 $ 16,006,960
����. MaySt� Rinckney Dr ����� Autumn {Yak Dr 568� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 28 ���� Rropose 24r027 � SSr648r086. � 16t030�987 ����
Rockwood Ln Emerson Ln Royal Ln 780 Res District 2 28 Candidate $ 66,399 $ 58,714,485 1 3 5
Sena St� Wesf Ector� 822 es �� istri�t�3 ��� 28 ���� Can i� ate �1�2Q1 SSr745�6�6. 1 3 5� ����
Kendolph Dr 135E S Underwood 477-3 Res District 4 28 Candidate $ 26,820 $ 58,772,506 1 3 5
publi� i�lput� ����� Mocki�gbird Ln: Bev�r{�e Dr Anysa.Ln 62i1-5� Col Dis#ri�t�1 28 ����� Candietate $ ���� �6,84Q �� SSr809r34�Z ; 1
Russell St Hickory W Mulberry W 792 Res District 1 28 Candidate $ 46,994 $ 58,856,340 1 3 5 7
14 or 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Chaparral Ct Cooper Branch E East 182 Res District 2 28 Candidate $ 47,139 $ 58,938,773 1 3 5 6
Se�ondSf. Boli+rar EImN 819 es ��istricf2 ��� 28 ���� Canc�idate� 53�928 5��992�701 1 3� 5
North Texas Blvd N Oak W Hickory W 50 Sar District 3 28 Candidate $ 133,536 $ 59,126,237 1
Ca�telliaSt. Highland Fark Rd Laurel 158� es �� is#ri�t 4���� 28 ���� Can i� ate ���� 14 �917 59�274r154 1 5� ����
Camden Ct Londonderry South 157 Res District 4 28 Candidate $ 17,334 $ 59,291,488 1 5 6
EI Ciel�ta St Carmel East� 298 � es �� is#ri�t 4���� 28 ���� Can i' ate 41�602. 59����Q`�� 1 2 3 5
Birchbrook Ct 135E S South 95 Res District 4 28 Candidate $ 16,804 $ 59,349,894 1 5 6
t?akSt W Cedar N: Elm N 66Q-1A5 Col District 1 28 Candidate $ 85t450 $ 59�435�344 1 �'
Frame St McKinney E Oak E 339-J4 Res District 1 28 Candidate $ 35,824 $ 59,471,168 1 5 6
Williarns Ln Buckingharn Dr Rayal Acres Dr� 959 es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 28 ���� Rropose 4Qt540 59�511t758� 16t0 1�578 ����
Kilkenny Ct Country Club Rd West 481 Res District 4 28 Candidate $ 38,520 $ 59,550,278 1 5 6
Face Dr� Raisley Weston Dr ����� 692-5� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 28 ���� Can i� ate 5�;928 5��6Q4t2Q6. 1 5� ����
Foxcroft Cir Old North Rd Emerson Ln 337-6 Res District 2 28 Candidate $ 104,245 $ 59,708,451 1 5
pub�i� i�lput� �� Hinkle or� Head�ee Meadov�r Ridge 417-s� �o� Distri�t�z� ��� zs ������ candietate $ ������ 1so�774 �� s9�ss9rzzs 1 ������ 4.
Mercedes Rd Oakwood Dr Willowwood 595 Res District 4 28 Candidate $ 61,873 $ 59,921,097 1 5 6
����. GYes�2nt St Carroll B�t N: ����� Anna. 245-14 Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 28 ���� Rropose 50�991 59�972�088� � 16t122�568 ����
Texas St Oakland Bell Av N 887 Res District 1 28 Candidate $ 104,534 $ 60,076,622 1 7
publi�i�lput��� 6annieBraeSt�N W(�akSt� ScriptureSt� ����� 1�7-1A Sar �is#ri�t�3 ��� 28 ���� Can i'ate ���� 434r34Q � 6Q�510�962 1 ��
Pirtle St Vine Frame 732 Res District 1 29 Candidate $ 57,395 $ 60,568,356 1 3 5
publi� i�lput� �� 6annie Brae St S Airport Rd Willaw�+road ����� 11L1-7 �ol Dis#ri�t 4���� 29 ����� Candietate $ ����� 526,5�1 �� 61�0.94r887 1 ����� 8
Oak St E Bradshaw N Crawford N 656-6 Res District 1 29 Proposed $ 50,975 $ 61,145,862 $ 16,173,543
B�ckingharn Dr� ���� Hercules Ln Surt V�Iley Dr� 149 � es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 29 ���� Can i' ate �9,5�1 � 61�185�39�' 1 3 5
Ave A Highland W Maple 36-3 Col District 3 29 Candidate $ 93,689 $ 61,279,082 1
Monterey Dr ����� Manhattan Dr ��� Ye11�v,rstone FI 626. es �� istri�t�2� ��� 29 ���� Can i� ate 99,141 � 61��78r22�� 1 5� ����
Wellington Dr Cambridge Ln Heather Ln 940-7 Res District 2 29 Candidate $ 64,088 $ 61,442,311 1 3 5 7
����. McKiq�ey St E���� lanni� CatYlpbell 581-13 Rar� � is#ri�t�1 ���� 29 ���� Rropose ���� 22�;359 � 61�665��Z 0 � 16t�96,9Q3 ����
Glenwood Ln Greenwood Dr Palmwood PI 361-7 Col District 2 29 Candidate $ 108,814 $ 61,774,484 1 9
Hill St: Smith. Stnith 411-II Res �� istri�t�1 ���� 29 ���� Can i� ate �SttlQS � 61�809r489 1 5� ����
Richmond Ct Southridge Dr North 1054 Res District 4 29 Candidate $ 29,275 $ 61,838,764 1 3 5 7
Wye �t� Coak. Allen Ct� 1t]01-3 Res � istri�t�1 29 ���� Can i� ate 43t91�� � 61�882�6 �� 1 3 5
Kerley St Duncan Scott Dr 480 Res District 1 29 Proposed $ 191,733 $ 62,074,410 $ 16,588,636
6alivax St Taliaferro Rass 1�6-7 Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 29 ���� Can i' ate 65t6�8 62;14t?,0�9 1 ���� 4�
Bolivar St Ross Sherman Dr W 106-8 Res District 2 29 Candidate $ 65,099 $ 62,205,138 1 4
Manhattan Dr� ��� Yellai�#one Rark. Sherman.Dr E 545-A Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� 29 ���� Can i� ate 85t90Q Fr2;291t0�7 1 3 5
Wayne St Pertain Boyd 932 Res District 1 29 Candidate $ 89,222 $ 62,380,259 1 5
Windsor Dr�W ����� Hinkle Dr Riney Rd 9i6-11 �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� 29 ���� Can i' ate 65t516. 62;445�77, � 1 7�
Northwood Terrace Greenwood Dr Cherrywood Ln 653-2 Res District 2 29 Proposed $ 158,606 $ 62,604,381 $ 16,747,242
Fdnnin St We1chS Beatty 314-A Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 29 ���� Can i' ate 4�;391 Fr2;652�772. 1 2 ����
Crescent St Stanley Thomas 245-2 Res District 3 29 Candidate $ 48,006 $ 62,700,778 1
Map�e st Ave c A�e c s4s-1 co� oistrict 3 z9 candielate $ s1z39 $ 62r7osro17 1 z 3
Rio Grande Blvd Dallas Dr Rio Grande Bv 772-15 Res District 1 29 Proposed $ 36,883 $ 62,745,899 $ 16,784,125
Geesling�Rd Fislltrap Rd Univetsit�r Dr�����E 355 �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 29 ����� Candidate $ 19�;028 �� 62;9�8r927 1 3 5� ���
Buckingham Dr Sun Valley Dr Hilton PI 149-2 Res District 2 29 Candidate $ 44,539 $ 62,983,466 1 3 5
15 or 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Panhandle St Ponder Av Fulton 699-J Col District 3 29 Candidate $ 60,851 $ 63,086,545 1 3 7
(?Id Bonnie Brae St� Bonnie Brae N; Scripture 6�0 es �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 29 ���� Can i' ate 62,643� �3s149r188 1 ��
Fairfax Rd Savannah Tr Longridge Dr 311 Res District 4 29 Candidate $ 199,004 $ 63,348,192 1 5 6 7
A�e C�S Chestnut. Highland W���� 44-4f �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� 29 ����� Candictate $� 52,965 � �3s4Q1t157 1
Paisley St Royal Meadow Brock Cr 695-J4 Col District 1 29 Candidate $ 51,435 $ 63,452,592 1
Anysa���.Ln West Moc�Cingbird Ln 21 �� es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� 29 ���� Can i' ate 7, t9��' �3s528,524 1 5� ����
Oakhill Dr Carroll Bv N West 665 Res District 2 29 Candidate $ 82,818 $ 63,611,342 1 5 6
�ngs Row Coaper Branch.E Loop 288 N����� 487-14 �ol Dis#ri�t�2� ��� 29 ����� Candietate $� ����� 187�t�4 � �3s798,426. 1 � 7�
Hillview Ct Hillview West 414 Res District 2 29 Candidate $ 35,679 $ 63,834,106 1 5 6
Clo�€er Ln. Robir�woad Ln���� Shet�+road 2Q�' �� es � is#ri�t�2� ��� �0 ���� Can i� ate 4C�224 �3s880�33Q 1 5� ����
Thomas St Panhandle Scripture 890-5 Res District 3 30 Proposed $ 131,482 $ 64,011,811 $ 16,915,606
publi� i�lput� �� Mocki�gbird Ln��: Haward Ct� Newport A�� ���� 62i1-7 �ol Dis#ri�t�1 ���� �0 ����� Candietate $� �9,841 � G4�051t65�' 1
Panhandle St Coit Carroll Bv N 699-JS Col District 2 30 Candidate $ 51,023 $ 64,102,676 1 2 3
A�e BS Eagle Dr�W Fannin 41-3� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� �0 ���� Can i� ate 61�247 � 64�163r922 1 2 ����
public input Morse St Lakey Bushey 629-3 Col District 1 30 Proposed $ 277,169 $ 64,441,091 $ 17,192,775
t3iney Rd Hardaway Rd ���� Elrn N 771-2� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� �0 ���� Can i� ate 259r7�5 � 64�7Q0�860 1 5 7�
Bolivar St Second First 106-J6 Col District 2 30 Proposed $ 93,328 $ 64,794,188 $ 17,286,103
n��iuerry st w������ c�rroii a� s ce�ar s s�s-e ��i m��ri�t�� ���� �o ����� can�i�ate ������� z11:ss�� �� sstc�os�s�x 1 ������ ��
Smith St Johnson Dallas Dr 841 Res District 1 30 Candidate $ 130,968 $ 65,136,839 1 3 5
����� ��re cs mapie Ea�e Qr w����� ��-&�t eoi oi��ri�t�� ��� �o ����� can�idate ������ c�sic �� sstzoo�sls 1
Thunderbird Dr Greenway Dr Carriage Hill 891-4 Col District 3 30 Proposed $ 122,761 $ 65,323,276 $ 17,408,864
publi� i�lput� ����� Mocki�gbird Ln��: Chio{e Ln. Bob (�--Link.Ln. 62i1-14 �ol Dis#ri�t�1 ���� �0 ����� Candietate $ ����� 64r5QQ �� 65t387�775 1
Kings Row Deerwood Pw Farris Rd 487-J6 Col District 2 30 Proposed $ 146,478 $ 65,534,253 $ 17,555,341
t3ia Grande Blvct Rio Grande B��� San Gabriel Dr 772-2N Res �� istri�t�1 ���� �0 ���� Can i� ate 62,547 � 6 t596t8(lQ 1 3 5 7�
Oakwood Dr McCormick Westwood Dr 674-2 Res District 4 30 Candidate $ 46,080 $ 65,642,880 1 3 5 7
����. 6av�rliRg�reen St� Georgetown Dir� Vanderbilt� ����� 116-3 Res � is#ri�t�3 ��� �0 ���� Rropose ���� 15�;984 � 6 ti96t86�' � 17�7i19��25-���
Oak Park Dr Timber Trail Oak Valley 1008-3 Res District 1 30 Proposed $ 101,837 $ 65,898,700 $ 17,811,162
Wilmnwoad Dr����� Brighton Cr Wi�ldmr E 9?il-�} Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �0 ���� Can i' ate 72,2 ��' � 6 t970�9?4 1 3 5 7�
Chapel Dr Pennsylvania East 183-3 Res District 4 30 Candidate $ 36,209 $ 66,007,182 1 3 5 7
Windsor Dr�E ����� Wilmn�road Di� Longfellow Ln. 9?5-1 �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� �0 ���� Can i' ate 159r7S6 6G,166t9�9 1 7�
Leslie St Parvin North 505-2 Res District 4 30 Candidate $ 76,414 $ 66,243,353 1 5 7
Mayhill Rd N Mills�: Rd Mc�nney E���� SZiI-Fi �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� �0 ���� Can i' ate 37k3;282 � 66,621;6�5 1 7' 8
Prairie St E Ave S Lakey 742-6 Col District 1 30 Candidate $ 76,917 $ 66,698,552 1 2 7
publi� i�lput� ����� Mocki�gbird Ln��: Montclair:Rl ����� Hummingbird Ln 62il-l�Z �ol Dis#ri�t�1 ���� �0 ����� Candietate $ ����� 34rA�6. �� 6G�7�3r038 1 7�
Ryan Rd W Country Club Rd Creekdale Dr 1675 Sar District 4 30 Candidate $ 318,609 $ 67,051,647 1 7 9
Lynhurs# Ln. Lafayette Dr� ����� Southridge ����� 5��-7 Res �� is#ri�t 4���� �0 ���� Can i� ate 9�A�9 � 67,145�106. 1 5� 7�
Leslie St Willowwood Dudley 505 Res District 4 31 Candidate $ 142,380 $ 67,287,486 1 5 7
Fa�sley st. Rose� ara�lsl,aw N������ 69s-z� �o� Distri�t�1 ���� �1 ������ candietate $ s�;zQO �� 67,34t1,6�6. 1 z ������ 7�
Creek Ave Redwood PI Shawnee 244-3 Res District 1 31 Candidate $ 45,839 $ 67,386,525 1 5 7
Audra����Ln. Mockingbird Ln. Moc�Cingbird Ln 3Q-1 Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� �1 ���� Can i� ate 43t528 � 67,430�052 1 5 7�
public input Greenwood Dr Sherman Dr E Preston PI 373 Col District 2 31 Candidate $ 12,005 $ 67,442,058 1 3 7
Li�ldsey St� McCormick. 135€ S 51�-A Res �� is#ri�t 4���� �1 ���� Can i� ate ���� 1�6,216 � 67,578r274 1 3 5 7�
Croydon Ln Windsor E Hanover Dr 252 Res District 2 31 Candidate $ 112,864 $ 67,691,138 1 5 7
publi� i�lput� �� Hinkle Dr� Northridge Magnolia 417-2� �ol Distri�t�2� ��� �1 ����� Candietate $ 95tt�3� �� 67,7$6t180 1 ����� 4. 7�
Lido Way Bell Av N Balboa Ct 1178 Res District 2 31 Candidate $ 81,133 $ 67,867,313 1 3 5 7
16 or 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Highland Park Rd Highland Park Cr North Texas Bv 407-J3 Col District 4 31 Candidate $ 208,388 $ 68,714,694 1 3 5 7
Bull Run St' Lee Dr Mack FI 151 es � istricf 1���� 31 ���� Canc�idate� 54�8�43 6�,769tS37 1 5 7'
McKinney St E Wood S Ruddell N 581-J Par District 1 31 Proposed $ 117,179 $ 68,886,716 $ 17,928,341
Sunburs# Trail ����� Baybtoake Dr� ����� Dav�rnlight Dr 1524-A Res �� is#ri�t 4���� �1 ���� Can i' ate 5�3�2 C�Sr94L1,018� 1 5 7�
Joyce Ln Gabe Ct Benjiman 472-3 Col District 2 31 Candidate $ 64,853 $ 69,004,871 1 7
publi� i�lput� �� Mocki�gbird Ln��: Raisley Weston Dr ����� 62i1-12� Col Dis#ri�t�1 ���� �1 ����� Candietate $� 50�A9�' � (�9�055�364 1 7�
Dover Dr Heather Ln Avon Dr 271-2 Res District 2 31 Candidate $ 72,562 $ 69,127,926 1 5 7
Mari�tta St� Scri?ture Ho�jstan RI ����� 558� es �� is#ri�t�3 ��� �1 ���� Can i' ate 4 t598� (�9�173r524 1 5 7�
Myrtle St Eagle Dr E Fort Worth Dr 639-3 Res District 1 31 Candidate $ 77,570 $ 69,251,094 1 5 7
Ch�ctawA�e ����� West Bo�ad 196. es �� istri�t�1 ���� �1 ���� Can i� ate 50�4fi1 (�9�301t555 1 5 7�
Ave C S Hickory W Mulberry W 44 Col District 3 31 Candidate $ 60,498 $ 69,362,053 1 7
Shadov�rTrail Rlum Hollov,r ����� WillawStone� 824-2� Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �1 ���� Can i' ate �6,7�8 � 69��98,791 1 3 5 7�
Shenandoah Trail Charleston Ct Southridge Dr 1051-3 Res District 4 31 Candidate $ 39,531 $ 69,438,323 1 5 7
Churchill Dr� ?Iic#aria.Dr Nottingham Dr 199-A Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �1 ���� Can i' ate ���� 172,t�Q � 69�610�362 1 3 5 7�
Eagle Dr W McCormick Ave A 280-9 Sar District 3 31 Candidate $ 119,626 $ 69,729,988 1 7 9
Frairie St E Bell Av E Skinner 742-3 Col Qis#rict 1 31 Candiclate $ 152,775 $ 69�882r763 1 7'
Broken Arrow Rd Dunes OId Orchard Ln 136-2 Res District 2 31 Candidate $ 85,514 $ 69,968,277 1 5 7
����. McKiq�ey St E����� Cra�rf�rd S Woad N 581-9A Rar� � is#ri�t�1 ���� �1 ���� Rropose ���� 159r895 70�128,17�' � 18�088,7�7 ����
Montecito Rd Hobson Ln E EI Paseo E 624 Col District 4 31 Proposed $ 553,404 $ 70,681,577 $ 18,641,641
TaliafettoSt� Elm N: East� 877-2� Res �� istri�t�2� ��� �1 ���� Can i� ate �6,4�0 70�718r02Fz 1 5� 7�
Kerley St Scott Dr Minor Cr 480-2 Res District 1 31 Proposed $ 38,905 $ 70,756,932 $ 18,680,546
Windsor Dr�W ����� Westgate Dr� ����� Crestmeadav;� 9i6-3 �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� �1 ���� Can i' ate 89,859 70�846t790 1 7�
Montecito Dr Hickory Creek Rd White Dove Ln 624-J3 Col District 4 32 Candidate $ 145,595 $ 70,992,385 1 7
Laurel�;St Wisteria Highland Rark.Cr� 501-5� Res �� is#ri�t 4���� �2� ���� Can i' ate 21�t�2 71�013,427 1 5 7�
Brookfield Ln Emerson Ln Woodhaven 140 Res District 2 32 Candidate $ 120,953 $ 71,134,380 1 5 7
6ayc� St� Tyler Wayne 117-7 Res �� istri�t�1 �2� ���� Can i� ate 87�296. 71�221�6 � 1 5 7�
Sandy Creek Dr Sandy Creek Dr Sandy Creek Dr 806-3 Res District 1 32 Candidate $ 24,268 $ 71,245,943 1 5 7
Mingo�Rd Sirius Dr� Cooper�Creek Rd 61L1-1�Z Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �2� ���� Can i' ate ���� 138;816 71�38Ar760 1 5 7�
Plum Hollow St Sagewood Shadow Tr 733-2 Res District 2 32 Candidate $ 95,674 $ 71,480,434 1 3 5 7
Cardi�ial Dr Chiole Ln. Meadav�rlark.Ln. 165-3 Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �2� ���� Can i' ate �7�22Q 71�517t6 4 1 5 7�
Buckingham Dr Hilton PI Williams 149-3 Res District 2 32 Candidate $ 25,664 $ 71,543,317 1 5 7
6alivax St Egan Corigress W����� 1�6-19 �ol Dis#ri�t�2' ��� �2' ����� Candidate $ 7Qt62Q �� 71�613,9�7 1 3
Ave C S Mulberry W Sycamore W 44-2E Col District 3 32 Candidate $ 53,495 $ 71,667,432 1 7
Welcl� St S Mulberry W ����� Sycamore W���� 9�5-2� Sar� � istri�t�3 ��� �2� ���� Can i� ate ���� 127�624 71�795�056. 1 7�
Nottingham Dr Devonshire Ct Emerson Ln 655-7 Sar District 2 32 Candidate $ 100,430 $ 71,895,487 1 3 7
DentonSt� Rearl Gregg 2b�-Fi Res � is#ri�t�2� ��� �2� ���� Can i� ate 4Qt687 71�9�6t17�' 1 2 3 5 7�
Northcrest Rd Foxcroft Cr South 651-2 Res District 2 32 Candidate $ 20,945 $ 71,957,119 1 5 7
Sagev�YOad St� Tanglewoad ����� Fear�Tree FI ����� 798� Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �2� ���� Can i� ate �St96�� 71�993r087 1 3 5 7�
Teasley Ln Duncan Dallas Dr 880-3W Sar District 1 32 Candidate $ 88,676 $ 72,081,763 1 7
����. Emersnn Ln. Lon�ellav�r Ln ��� Glenwoad Ln���� 3Q�-A Col Dis#ri�t�2� ��� �2� ���� Candietate $ ����� 10�;870 �� 72;185��Z�3� 1 5� 7�
Sheraton Rd Hercules Ln Sun Valley Dr 830-2 Res District 2 32 Proposed $ 53,687 $ 72,239,320 $ 18,734,233
publi� i�lput� �� Mistywoad Ln ����� Royal Ln Rackwoad Ln� 618=5� Res � is#ri�t�2� ��� �2� ���� Can i' ate 43t383� 72�282;7t14 1 3
Eagle Dr W Welch S Beatty 280-J2 Sar District 3 32 Candidate $ 117,470 $ 72,400,173 1 7 9
U or 23
Note
Committee
Committee
Proposal
Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Stratford St Avon Dr Wellington Dr 858-3 Res District 2 32 Candidate $ 42,131 $ 72,575,482 1 5 7
Kayewood Dr Glenwood Ln Laurelwood Dr 476-7 Res District 2 32 Candidate $ 74,970 $ 72,692,824 1 5 7
(?aktree St {7ak Rark Dr� ����� LatEi�nore 66�-Fi Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� �2� ���� Can i' ate 67�7`�5 72�760�619 1 5 7�
Valley View Rd Sun Valley Dr Kings Rw 920 Res District 2 32 Candidate $ 145,606 $ 72,906,225 1 5 7
Sun Valley Dr� ����� Sunrtydale Ln. ���� Stuart�Rd 86�-A Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �2� ���� Can i' ate 22,727 72�928,951 1 5 7�
Windsor Dr E Olympia Dr Windstream 975-5 Sar District 2 32 Candidate $ 244,816 $ 73,173,767 1 7
WayneSt� Snyd�r� Mozingo� 9�2-A Res �� is#ri�t�1 �2� ���� Can i' ate 44r6S�' 73s218r451 1 2 ���� 5 7�
Locksley Ln Jamestown Ln Maid Marion PI 516-2 Res District 2 32 Candidate $ 43,768 $ 73,262,219 1 5 6 7
Thunderbird Dr����� 135E �i Colanial Dr ����� 891 �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� �2� ����� Candietate $� 50�4�4 � 73s�12�65�' 1 7�
Sycamore St W Ave D S Ave C 871-2 Res District 3 32 Candidate $ 84,888 $ 73,397,542 1 7
6annie BraeSt�N Windsar�W Frivate Dr 1�7-3 �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� �3 ���� Can i� ate ���� 1t021�2Q�' 74,418r74' 1 7� ��
Oak St E Locust S Austin 656 Col District 1 33 Candidate $ 73,209 $ 74,491,954 1 2 7
Meade�w Ln. Rheasant�Hollov,r Sagev�road ����� 586. es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �3 ���� Can i� ate �31512 74,525�466. 1 3 5� 7�
Hollyhill Ln Ticonderoga Dr Lafayette Dr 422-J3 Res District 4 33 Candidate $ 120,712 $ 74,646,178 1 3 7
�ondonderry Ln����� lason Dr� Teasley Ln. 527-2� Col Dis#ri�t 4���� �3 ����� Candietate $ 222r571 �� 74,8b8,749 1 3
Robbie-O St Brooke Evers Pw 774 Res District 2 33 Candidate $ 32,598 $ 74,901,347 1 5 7
FierceSt� Rrai�ie W Highland W���� 726-2' Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� �3 ���� Can i� ate 71�647 74,972�994 1 5 7�
Westgate Dr Barrow Dr Fladger Dr 944-2 Res District 3 33 Candidate $ 247,924 $ 75,220,918 1 5 7
I�orth���Te�eas Blvd Stella Sycamore W���� 50-3� �ar� � istri�t�3 ��� �3 ���� Can i� ate ���� 144r316 75t3b5��34 1 7�
Denton St Gregg Oak W 263-7 Res District 2 33 Candidate $ 32,742 $ 75,397,976 1 2 5 7
Corrtell Ln. Dartrnouth FI ����� Arnhetst�Dr ����� 235-2� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� �3 ���� Can i� ate 55t4F9 75t4 3�44' 1 3 5 7�
public input Crestwood PI Liveoak Edgewood PI 248-2 Res District 2 33 Candidate $ 117,486 $ 75,570,931 1 5 7
Bell A�e N Woa�IlaRd Univetsit�r Dr�����E 7816 �ol Distri�t�1 ���� �3 ����� Candidate $ 7k�;565 �� 7�t649r496. 1 7�
Pembrooke PI Savannah Tr Chasewood Ln 716 Res District 4 33 Candidate $ 92,689 $ 75,742,185 1 2 5 7
Windsor Dr�E ����� BumingTree Ln Dunes 9?5-1A1 �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� �3 ���� Can i� ate ���� 174r7 �9 75t916t964 1 7�
Highland St E Locust S Wainwright 400 Res District 1 33 Candidate $ 38,664 $ 75,955,628 1 7
Hickory St W ����� Fry ����� Welch N: 394-12� �ar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� �3 ���� Can i' ate ���� 180t969 76,1�6t597 1 2 3
Sierra Dr Yellowstone PI Sherman Dr E 835-3 Res District 2 33 Candidate $ 105,786 $ 76,242,383 1 5 7
6aybre�ake Dr ����� NighYFall Dr� Waterside FI ����� 15�1-2� Res �� istri�t 4���� �3 ���� Can i� ate �1,�442 76,273r825 1 5 7�
Mozingo St Tyler Wayne 632 Res District 1 33 Candidate $ 127,357 $ 76,401,182 1 3 5 7
Garden�iew St. ���� Broake E?€ers Fw 350-3 Res �� istri�t�2� ��� �3 ���� Can i� ate 42r902. 76,444r083� 1 5 7�
Brookhollow Dr Westview Tr Crestmeadow 142 Res District 3 33 Candidate $ 32,598 $ 76,476,681 1 5 7
Serninole��te ���� Boyd Redwoad FI ���� 821-2' Res � is#ri�t�1 ���� �3 ���� Can i� ate 38;761 76,515�442 1 5 7�
James St Mission W Fort Worth Dr 455-3 Res District 3 33 Proposed $ 172,955 $ 76,688,396 $ 18,907,188
Wye �t� AIIen Ct. Cross Timber� 1(l0�-A Res �� istri�t�1 �3 ���� Can i� ate 41�746. 76,7�0,142 1 2 3 5 7�
Brooke St Brooke West 139-C2 Res District 2 33 Candidate $ 5,008 $ 76,735,150 1 5 7
����� �o�€ell St� Egan Corigress W����� 53b. es �� is#ri�t�3 ��� �� ���� Can i' ate 38;905 76,7 4r055 1 5 7�
Sena St Bradley Gober 822-3 Res District 3 34 Proposed $ 103,234 $ 76,877,289 $ 19,010,421
Forest St Fawler Dr� Falmer Dr� 328=2� Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �� ���� Can i� ate �9,916. 76,917t2Q 1 5 7�
Forrestridge Dr Highview Cr Highview Cr 329-2E Col District 4 34 Candidate $ 91,394 $ 77,008,599 1 3 7
Fheasant�Hollav�r St� Meadow Flum Hallaw ���� 722. � es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �� ���� Can i� ate �1�346. 7,0�9r94 ' 1 3 5 7�
Underwood St North Texas Bv Kendolph Dr 915 Res District 4 34 Candidate $ 42,228 $ 77,082,172 1 3 5 7
Tom Cole Rd Rrivate Torn Cole Rd ���� 896-2' Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� �� ���� Can i� ate ���� 334r88�' 7,417t056. 1 5 7�
public input Bonnie Brae St S W Hickory St Stella St 110 Sar District 3 34 Candidate $ 110,376 $ 77,527,432 1 3 7
18 or 23
Note
public input
public input
public input
Name From
Cordell St Fulton
Sycamore5t'W ���� Carroll BwS.
Crescent St Alice
loshua St� Bob-£�--Link Ln ����
Bristol St Windsor E
Woadlanc� St Brown
Bonnie Brae St N W Hickory St
GYestv�oad FI ����� Green�road Dr
Churchill Dr Churchill G
Cl�urchill Cir Chur�hill Cir� �����
Eagle Dr W Beatty
Greenwoad Dr ����� Kaye�road Dr �����
Thomas St Linden Dr
Bellaire Dr Bob-£�--Link Ln ����
Creek Ave Nevada
Qunes St Broken Arrow F
Creek Ave West
Windsor Dr�E ���� Bristol
Austin St N Oak E
Redwoad FI Laurelwaad Qr
Mulberry St W Welch S
Jason Dr North
Pierce St Stroud
Fottestridge Dr� ���� HighViev�r GY� ����
North Texas Blvd Wilshire
Trinit�r Rd S Rrivate
Mulberry St E Austin
Wis#eriaSt North
Alice St Egan
Wessex Ct, North
Castle Ln Wilsonwood Dr
Wilmnwoad Dr����� Sherrnan Dr�E ����
Shadow Trail Pear Tree Pl
I�orth ���Te�eas Blvd Eagle Dr� W
Mockingbird Ln Bob-O-Link Ln
FultanSt Cordell
Prairie St W Elm S
Royal Acres Dr� ���� Hercules Ln
Underwood St Collier
Central A�re Highland W
Longfellow Ln Windsor E
Face Qr Nev,rport A�t
Thomas St Emery
To
Alice
Elrn 5
Denton
Montc�air�Fl ����
North
Cherrywoad L
W Oa k St
Kayewoad Qr
Wellington Dr
Churchill Dr� �����
Bernard
Redwoad FI �����
Panhandle
Montc�air�Fl ����
Navajo
Qunes FI
Boyd
Hano�€er Dr� �����
Hickory E
Greenwoad �����
Bernard
Londanderry ����
Prairie W
High�iew Cr ����
135E N
Fri�€ate
Industrial
C�alf Ct'
Congress W
Waterford W'
South
Castle Ln �
Windbrook
Wilshire
Montclair PI
Crescent�
Locust S
UUilliarns
Ave B S
Maple
Edinberg Ln
Christopher �����
Bellmead Dr
SegID Class District
53$-2 Res
231-7 Res
871 6 Res
245 J1 Col
47Q-4 Res
132 Res
993=4 Res
107-1 Sar
248=5 Res
199 Res
198=A� Res
280 J3 Sar
373=1 Res
890 4 Res
81-2, Res
244-5 Res
277-7 Res
244 Res
975-13 Sar
32 9 Res
765 es
635-4 Col
459 es
726 Res
329-2UU Col
50-J Sar
9Q5-3 Col
633-2 Res
983 es
12-8 Res
942. es
174 Res
97Q Col
824-5 Res
Stl-9 Sar
620-JS Col
3,44-4 Sar
744 9 Res
787 es
915-5 Res
178 es
528 3 Res
692. es
890 Res
District 2
Qistrict 1
District 2
Qis#rict 1
District 2
Qis#rict 2
District 3
Qis#rict 2
District 2
Ris#rict�2
District 3
Qis#rict 2
District 3
Qis#rict 1
District 1
Qis#rict 2
District 1
Qis#rict 2
District 1
Qis#rict 2
District 3
Qis#rict 4
District 1
Ris#rict 4
District 3
Qis#rict 2
District 1
Qis#rict 4
District 2
Qis#rict 4
District 2
Qis#rict 2
District 2
Qis#rict 3
District 1
Qis#rict 2
District 1
Qis#rict 2
District 3
Qis#rict 3
District 2
Qis#rict 1
District 3
19 or 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
34 Candidate $. 35r679 $ 77;563s111 1 7
34 Candidate $ 121,338 $ 77,684,449 1 5 7
34 ���� Candidate� $ 134�194. $ 77�$18�643 1 7'
34 Candidate $ 85,156 $ 77,903,799 1 7
�� can�i�ate � cot��z � ��,�c�r��s 1 s �
34 Candidate $ 84,359 $ 78,048,489 1 5 7
��+ ���� candictate $� ���� 6s,a9s � 7#�r117;sss 1 s 7�
34 Candidate $ 142,786 $ 78,260,371 1 7 9
�� ����� can�i�ate �� ����� ��sts�1 � ��r��stzoz 1 s a�
34 Candidate $ 14,397 $ 78,410,599 1 5 7
�� ����� can�i�ate �� zz,ssz � �sr���r�si 1 z � s ��
34 Candidate $ 154,262 $ 78,587,443 1 7 9
�� ����� can�i�ate � ��tcu+� �� ��rcco��s� 1 � s ��
34 Candidate $ 98,611 $ 78,759,098 1 7
�� can�i�ate � cotszl � �srsssr�ls 1 s �
34 Candidate $ 63,173 $ 78,882,892 1 5 7
�� ����� can�i�ate � �stss�� �� ��r�ssrsco 1 s a�
34 Candidate $ 49,306 $ 78,968,165 1 5 7
�� ����� can�i�ate � ������ ��st�sz �� �s�1��ss� 1 z ������ a�
34 Candidate $ 48,006 $ 79,151,863 1 5 7
�5� ���� Can i� ate 51�858 79�2Q�72Q 1 3 5 7�
35 Candidate $ 217,686 $ 79,421,406 1 7
�5� Can i� ate 6�702. 79�4�5�1(l9 1 3 5 7�
35 Candidate $ 41,602 $ 79,526,711 1 5 7
�s� ����� can�i�ate � ������ �s:�s� �� �s�clsr�os 1 �
35 Candidate $ 96,814 $ 79,714,918 1 7
�s� ����� can�i�ate � ������ �1:�� �� �s�sos:�sz 1 ��
35 Candidate $ 62,402 $ 79,868,715 1 7
�5� Can i�ate 34r909 79�9Q�67�� 1 5 7�
35 Candidate $ 46,609 $ 79,950,233 1 7
�5� Can i�ate 27:879 79�978r111 1 5 7�
35 Candidate $ 26,723 $ 80,004,835 1 5 7
�s� ����� can�i�ate � ����� �srzil �� sa�c�s�t�oc 1 �
35 Candidate $ 65,099 $ 80,149,204 1 3 5 7
�s� ����� can�i�ate � cs;s�c �� sa�zl�t�s� 1 a�
35 Candidate $ 106,283 $ 80,324,064 1 7
�s� ����� Rroposed $ ������ 144,47s �� f3a�46srs3� �� 19�1s4.s96 ������
35 Candidate $ 49,450 $ 80,517,989 1 5 6 7
�5� ���� Can i� ate 88,066. � f3(1�606:055 1 3 5 7�
35 Candidate $ 33,657 $ 80,639,712 1 5 7
�5� ���� Can i� ate 51�761 � f30�691473� 1 5 7�
35 Candidate $ 48,776 $ 80,740,249 1 3 5 7
�5� ���� Can i� ate 94r615 � f30�83�}i864 1 5 7�
35 Candidate $ 112,864 $ 80,947,727 1 7
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Forrestridge Dr Hobson Ln E Highview Cr 329-1E Col District 4 35 Candidate $ 31,014 $ 81,024,821 1 3 7
Seminole Ave West Boyd St 821 Res District 1 35 Candidate $ 52,772 $ 81,470,203 1 5 7
Winston Dr Waterford Wy����� East� 980-3 Res �� is#ri�t 4���� �6 ���� Can i' ate 1�;723� 81,4��,926. 1 3 5 7�
Yellowstone PI Laguna Dr Sierra Dr 1002-5 Res District 2 36 Candidate $ 38,376 $ 81,522,301 1 3 5 7
Autumn Oak Dr Lattimore Oak Tree 35 Res District 1 36 Candidate $ 142,717 $ 81,760,547 1 5 7
Maddox St Prairie E South 541 Res District 1 36 Candidate $ 75,644 $ 82,048,051 1 5 7
Linden Dr Bryan Ponder Av 512-J Res District 3 36 Candidate $ 115,416 $ 82,175,552 1 5 7
pub�i� i�lput� �� Morse st aushey Newton 6z9-A �o� Distri�t�1 ���� �6 ������ candietate $� ����� 337�651 � s�;s13,z34 1 z 3
Crestwood PI Lindwood Dr Greenwood Dr 248-4 Res District 2 36 Candidate $ 45,598 $ 82,558,832 1 3 5 7
Greenwood Dr Glenwood Kayewood Dr 373-9 Res District 2 36 Candidate $ 97,456 $ 82,733,969 1 3 5 7
V�lley;Creek Rd����� Canyan Ct� South 919-2� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� �6 ���� Can i' ate 69,t1�5 � 8�;80�,064 1 5 7�
public input Hinkle Dr Tulane Dr Bryn Mawr PI 417-9 Col District 2 36 Candidate $ 97,514 $ 82,900,579 1 4 7
Pecan St W Elm Locust N 715-2 Res District 1 36 Candidate $ 49,065 $ 83,026,973 1 5 7
Greenway Dr Windsor Farms Dr Brookhollow Dr 372 Res District 3 36 Candidate $ 38,905 $ 83,134,144 1 5 7
Meadowlark Ln King Fisher Ln Cardinal Cr 592 Res District 2 36 Candidate $ 126,972 $ 83,290,005 1 5 7
Wes�aySt� Alic2� Coit' 951-3 Res � is#ri�t�2' ��� �6 ���� Can i' ate 87�Q55 � 83��7 �061 1 3 5 7�
Cordell St Aileen Gober 231-3 Res District 3 36 Candidate $ 63,028 $ 83,440,089 1 5 7
Heritage Ln Locust N East 391 Res District 2 36 Candidate $ 82,818 $ 83,594,527 1 5 7
Williarns St {7ak 1tU Hi�kory W ���� 958� es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �6 ���� Can i' ate 4�;5�5 � 83�643,06�' 1 5 7�
Coronado Dr Winchester Ct Stuart Rd 236-5 Col District 2 36 Proposed $ 62,616 $ 83,705,679 $ 19,294,841
Ross St Carroll Bv N Denison 785 Res District 2 36 Candidate $ 47,909 $ 83,845,983 1 5 7
Coronado Dr Cordova Cr Winchester Ct 236-4 Col District 2 36 Proposed $ 51,494 $ 83,990,224 $ 19,346,335
Kayewood Dr Crestwood PI Palmwood PI 476-2 Res District 2 37 Candidate $ 49,065 $ 84,095,673 1 5 7
Mayhill Rd S Sper�cer Rd Fos#er Rd 57�-5� Sar� � is#ri�t�1 ���� �7 ���� Can i' ate ���� 2(14r616 � 84�3Q0�289 1 7' 8
Meadow Lane PI Hercules Ln Meadow Lane PI 587-1E Res District 2 37 Candidate $ 25,953 $ 84,326,242 1 5 7
Egan St Ponder Av Fulton 297-4 Res District 2 37 Candidate $ 45,839 $ 84,419,845 1 2 3 5 7
I3iaGrande Blvct Dalla� Dr� RiaGrande B�t 772-1N Res � istri�t�1 ���� �7 ���� Can i� ate 44r5�9 � 84�46Ar384 1 5 7�
Pickwick Ln Oxford Ct Windsor E 725-2 Res District 2 37 Candidate $ 79,592 $ 84,543,976 1 5 7
Trinity Rd S Private Private 905-7 Col District 2 37 Candidate $ 21,245 $ 84,648,140 1 7
Lillian ���B Ivliller� Wcvey 135 E Sou�hridge ����� SQ9-1E �ar� � is#ri�t 4���� �7 ���� Can i' ate 37Qt562. � SStQ18r70�� 1 7�
Cherrywood Ln Roberts Northwood Terrace 189-2 Res District 2 37 Candidate $ 8,330 $ 85,027,033 1 5 7
20 0. 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Kayewood Dr Palmwood PI Greenwood Dr 476-3 Res District 2 37 Candidate $ 77,666 $ 85,223,576 1 5 7
Hickory Sf W Elm N Locusf N �9A-1A Gol Districf 1���� 37 ���� Candidate� $ 134�11� $ 85�357t695 1 ���� & 7' 9
Churchill Dr Wellington Dr Windsor E 199-2 Res District 2 37 Candidate $ 70,492 $ 85,428,186 1 3 5 7
Lattimore St Autumn (k�k.Qr Fine C?ak Qr StlO-3 Col Qis#rict 1 37 Candidate $ 24r187 $ SSt452r374 1 5� 7
Emery St West Fulton 304-9 Res District 3 37 Candidate $ 57,250 $ 85,509,624 1 5 7
Emersnn Ln. Freedam Ln ���� Liber�j! Ln 3Q�-1A6. Col Dis#ri�t�2� ��� �7 ����� Candietate $� 65t5QQ � SSt575�124 1 7�
Ave C S Sycamore W Chestnut 44-3E Col District 3 37 Candidate $ 68,678 $ 85,643,802 1 7
�o�€ell St� Congress W ����� Scripture 53b-2� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� �7 ���� Can i' ate 4 t694 SSt689r496. 1 5 7�
Kerley St Minor Cr Shady Oaks 480-3 Res District 1 37 Proposed $ 76,799 $ 85,766,296 $ 19,423,134
Ar�hetst�Dr Fardham Ln. ���� Malane 17-4 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� �7 ���� Can i' ate 4Qt5�0 SSt806�886. 1 2 ���� 5 7�
Hickory Creek Rd Mosspoint Ct Livingstone Dr 397-J1 Par District 4 37 Candidate $ 104,881 $ 85,911,768 1 3 7
����. Mimosa.Dr Carroll B�t N: ����� Bol[�rar 6(i.9-3 Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �7 ���� Rropose ���� 1(1Ot296 � 86,012:064 � 19�523�431 ����
Ruddell St N Willis Texas 789-3 Res District 1 37 Candidate $ 69,962 $ 86,082,026 1 7
Fanhandle St� ���� Thornas Hilicres# 699-3 �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� �7 ����� Candietate $ 13Qt176 �� 86,212�2Q2 1 3
loof St Highland W Eagle Dr W 451-2 Res District 3 37 Candidate $ 122,349 $ 86,334,551 1 7
Windsor Dr�E ����� Branch Cros�ing Wi�1dy Hill 9?5-1A5 �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� �7 ���� Can i' ate 65t6 :5 � 86,4Q0�2Q �� 1 7�
Bolivar St Panhandle Egan 106-J8 Col District 2 37 Candidate $ 61,322 $ 86,461,528 1 3 7
public input Scripture St Lo�€e11 Bryan. 817-12 Col Qis#rict 3 37 Candiclate $ 64r�441 $ 86,525�969 1 3
Bowling Green St Vanderbilt Auburn Dr 116-4 Res District 3 37 Proposed $ 80,025 $ 86,605,994 $ 19,603,456
A�e H; Hic�COry W Stetla. 59 Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� �7 ���� Can i' ate 71�358 � 86,67 t35�' 1 3
Orr St Elm Locust N 688-2 Res District 2 37 Candidate $ 49,065 $ 86,726,417 1 2 5 7
����. Windsor Dr�E ����� Windstream ���� Stuart�Rd 9?5-6 �ar� � is#ri�t�2� ��� �8 ���� Rropose ���� 15�;358 � 86,879r77.' � 19�756,814 ����
Audra Ln Paisley Lee Dr 30-4B Sar District 1 38 Candidate $ 96,883 $ 86,976,658 1 2 7
A[cl�erTrail Faxc�ofi Cr Em�tson Ln. ���� 23-4 Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �8 ���� Can i� ate ���� 114r019 � 87,0.90�6 $' 1 5� 7�
Natchez Trace Stone Mountain Dr East 1055-3 Res District 4 38 Candidate $ 51,087 $ 87,141,765 1 5 7
Sheratan Rd Sheraton RI Imperial Dr ����� 83Q-5� Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �8 ���� Can i� ate �9,Q50 � 87,180,814 1 3 5 7�
Ave A Margie Collins W 36-8 Col District 3 38 Candidate $ 68,560 $ 87,249,375 1 7
(?akSt�E C7aklat�d Be11'�A�E 656-3 �ol Distri�t�1 ����� �8 ����� Candietate $ ����� 116,5�3� �� 87,�65�898 1 7�
Kayewood Dr Laurelwood Dr Greenwood Dr 476-8 Res District 2 38 Candidate $ 42,902 $ 87,408,799 1 5 7
c�a�st E �ust�n c�a�i�nd ssc-z c�i o»�r��t � �s can�i�ate � ��zros� � s�,s�o,ss� 1 �
public input Laurelwood Dr Rockwood Ln Greenwood Dr 502-3 Res District 2 38 Candidate $ 76,510 $ 87,617,369 1 5 7
Li�1da.Ln Cobblestone Rw North. 511 �� es � istri�t�2� ��� �8 ���� Can i� ate 3Qt96Q � 87,648r329 1 5 7�
Sagewood St Meadow Lane Pl Plum Hollow 798 Res District 2 38 Candidate $ 35,968 $ 87,684,297 1 3 5 7
Colli�r,�St Eagle Dr�W Unc�erwoad ����� 2(l8� es �� istri�t�3 ��� �8 ���� Can i� ate 154,4fi � 87,838,76�� 1 5 7�
Spencer Rd Bridges Mayhill Rd 848-4 Sar District 1 38 Candidate $ 115,314 $ 87,954,077 1 7
Waterford Way����� Wesse�e Ct� Wi�lston Dr ����� 9�1 � es �� istri�t 4���� �8 ���� Can i� ate ���� 202,374 � f3�,156t�}51 1 3 5 7�
First St Elm N Locust N 318-2 Res District 2 38 Candidate $ 51,376 $ 88,207,827 1 3 5 7
Wes�aySt� Anna Bol[�rar 951-Fi Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �8 ���� Can i' ate 4C�578� � 88,254r4Q' 1 3 5 7�
Olympia Dr North Wolftrap Dr 686 Res District 2 38 Candidate $ 18,104 $ 88,272,510 1 5 7
�o�€ers Ln Little Braak Rct Fruth Rd 1�26-2� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� �8 ���� Can i' ate 117�7�7 � f3�,�90�23� 1 5� 7�
Mulberry St W Elm S Locust S 635-8 Res District 1 38 Candidate $ 59,615 $ 88,449,852 1 4 7
Bernard St Acme Far+tin 87-15 Col Qis#rict 4 38 Candidate $ 296,781 $ 88,746t632 1 7'
Maple St Ave C S Ave B S 549-2 Col District 3 38 Candidate $ 153,716 $ 88,900,348 1 2 3 7
21 or 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Willowwood St Jacqueline Dr Leslie 965-J1 Col District 4 38 Candidate $ 53,377 $ 89,156,169 1 3 7
public input Mockingbird Ln: Audra Ln Ter�y Ct 62Q-3A Col District 1 38 Candiclate $ 35t957 $ 89�192r127 1 7'
Fox Hollow St Kenwood Timberidge 336 Res District 1 38 Candidate $ 109,397 $ 89,301,523 1 5 7
Co[dell St� Ec#or Aileen 231-2� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� �8 ���� Can i' ate 68 18(l S�J��69r7t14 1 5 7�
Kendolph Dr Lindsey Willowwood 477-6 Res District 4 38 Candidate $ 113,249 $ 89,482,953 1 3 5 7
Branch Crossing� Windsar�E Cooper�Braneh E 1?�' � es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �8 ���� Can i' ate 4 t598� S�J�528,551 1 5 7�
Nottingham Dr Kings Rw Stratford 655 Col District 2 38 Candidate $ 56,261 $ 89,584,811 1 3 7
Uland St� Railroad ��t Frame 912. � es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� �8 ���� Can i' ate 4Qt3�2. S�J�625�11�' 1 3 5 7�
Ridgecrest Cir Ridgecrest Cir Lexington Ln 770 Res District 4 39 Candidate $ 140,742 $ 89,765,855 1 7
Bernard St� Rarvin. Rasela�rn Dr ��� 8716 �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� �9 ����� Candietate $� ����� 197:SS9 � SJ�963�415 1 7�
Belhaven St Fordham Ln Bowling Green 77-2 Res District 3 39 Candidate $ 38,664 $ 90,002,079 1 5 7
De1 Dr Danna Riney Rd 2b1 �� es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �9 ���� Can i' ate 91�678� 9a�0.93r757 1 5 7�
Hercules Ln Royal Acres Dr Wellington Dr 390-J Col District 2 39 Candidate $ 41,195 $ 90,134,952 1 7
publi� i�lput� �� Morse St Loap� 288�5 ��nberly Dr ����� 629-7 �ar� �� is#ri�t�1 ���� �9 ���� Can i� ate ���� 322,89�' � 90�4 7t84 � 1 7�
Oak St E Bell Av E East 656-4 Res District 1 39 Candidate $ 43,142 $ 90,500,987 1 7
SaladaSt� Dunes Cooper�Braneh E 799 es �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �9 ���� Can i' ate ���� 17 �962. � 9a�678r95Q 1 5 7�
Victoria Dr Churchill Dr Nottingham Dr 923 Res District 2 39 Candidate $ 183,981 $ 90,862,931 1 3 5 7
A�eA����� EagleDr�W Fannin 365 �ol Dis#ri�t�3 ��� �9 ����� Candietate $ 14�;5�7 �� 91�011�468 1 7�
McCormick St 135 E Michial 578-5 Col District 4 39 Candidate $ 105,930 $ 91,117,398 1 7
����. Rober#s St Brown Bro�rn. 775-2� Res � is#ri�t�2� ��� �9 ���� Rropose �9,194 � 91�156t592 � 19�796,i108 ����
Brooke St Gardenview Brooke 139-3 Res District 2 39 Candidate $ 40,446 $ 91,197,038 1 5 7
Royal Meadows��St. Raisley South 788=2� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� �9 ���� Can i� ate 38;664 � 91�7�5�70�' 1 3 5 7�
Northridge St Carroll Bv N Bolivar 652-3 Res District 2 39 Candidate $ 101,452 $ 91,337,155 1 5 7 8
T�i�lit�r Rd S Mills�� Rd Frivate 9Q5-2� Col Dis#ri�t�2� ��� �9 ����� Candidate $ ����� 142r249 �� 91�479r454 1 7�
Hercules Ln Huntington Dr Buckingham Dr 390-8 Col District 2 39 Candidate $ 43,549 $ 91,523,003 1 7
SouthiidgeDr ����� Stonegate RidgecrestCr� 847-5� �ol Dis#ri�t4 ���� �9 ����� Candietate $ 87�86�' �� 91�610�866. 1 7�
Southridge Dr Lynhurst Ln Lillian B Miller Pw 847-J3 Col District 4 39 Candidate $ 65,618 $ 91,676,484 1 7
����. Wilderness St ����� Ti�nher Ridge Cr� Co{qrada B�� ����� 957-2� Res �� is#ri�t�1 ���� �9 ���� Rropose 21�t�2 � 91�697�525 � 19�817.(l49 ����
Mimosa Dr Mesquite Carroll Bv N 609-2 Res District 2 39 Candidate $ 148,928 $ 91,846,453 1 5 7
(?Imos GYeek.Rl ����� San Gabri�l Dr� South 6�5 es �� is#ri�t�1 ���� �9 ���� Can i� ate �9,916. � 91�886t37Q 1 5 7�
public input Laurelwood Dr Greenwood Dr University Dr E 502-4 Res District 2 39 Candidate $ 102,608 $ 91,988,977 1 5 7
Qeerwoad Rkwy Grant Fw Qeerfield Qr 1021 Col Qis#rict 2 39 Candiclate $ 36,899 $ 92r025�876. 1 7
public input Morse St Kimberly Dr Mayhill Rd 629-8 Sar District 1 39 Candidate $ 414,518 $ 92,440,394 1 7
Laguna Dr� Yellai�#one RI��� Sherman.Dr E 49�-2� Res �� is#ri�t�2� ��� �9 ���� Can i� ate ���� 125t96Q � 92;566t355 1 5 7�
Ave G S Stella Charlotte 58-2 Res District 3 39 Candidate $ 45,454 $ 92,611,808 1 7
Cordell St� Gaber Malane 231-A Res � is#ri�t�3 ��� �9 ���� Can i' ate 7, t114 � 9�;686t922 1 5 7�
Sena St Gober Malone 822-4 Res District 3 39 Proposed $ 57,780 $ 92,744,702 $ 19,874,829
Sycamore St W����� Bernard Car[all B�5 ����� 871-5� Res �� is#ri�t�3 ��� 4Ll ���� Can i' ate ���� 16�;18(l � 9�;9Q t883� 1 3
Bobcat Rd Locust CI 104 Res District 2 40 Candidate $ 55,228 $ 92,963,111 1 5 6 7
Bell A�e N Driftwoad Tr ����� Chisholm Tr ����� 78 6. �ol Distri�t�2� ��� 4Ll ����� Candietate $ 80t21�� �� 93�(143,32�� 1 7�
public input Fulton St Grace Temple Av Gregg 344-J1 Sar District 2 40 Proposed $ 116,543 $ 93,159,867 $ 19,991,373
Spencer Rd Loap;288�5 Bri�ges 84�-3 Sar� � is#ri�t�1 ���� 4Ll ���� Can i� ate ���� 358118�' � 93�518r0A9 1 7�
Lillian B Miller Pkwy Shenandoah Tr Hunters Ridge Cr 509-2E2 Sar District 4 40 Candidate $ 131,728 $ 93,649,777 1 7
�ne St. Gro�€e Col[ege E 925 �� es � istri�t�1 ���� 4tl ���� Can i� ate 4 t694 � 93�695�471 1 7�
public input Hinkle Dr Windsor W Northridge 417 Col District 2 40 Candidate $ 83,744 $ 93,779,215 1 4 7
22 0. 23
Committee
Committee Proposal
Note Name From To SegID Class District OCI Proposal Estimated Cost Cumulative Cost Cumulative Cost Reasons not Proposed
Barnes Dr Mockingbird Ln Pace Dr 69 Res District 1 40 Candidate $ 132,750 $ 93,965,341 1 5 7
Sandy��Creek Dr ���� Sandy Creek Di� Sandy Creek �r 806' 2 Res � istricf 1���� 40 ���� Candidate� 34�524. 9� 999t8b5' 1 5 7'
Stroud St Carroll Bv S Pierce 859 Res District 1 40 Candidate $ 59,562 $ 94,059,426 1 2 5 7
Austi�lSt�N Sav,ryerA�� Hann. 32-3� Res �� is#ri�t�1 4Ll ���� Can i' ate 91�292. 9A�150�719 1 5 7�
Eagle Dr W Cleveland Carroll Bv S 280-J6 Sar District 3 40 Candidate $ 111,280 $ 94,261,999 1 7 9
I�orth���Te�eas Blvd Chertnut. Frairi� W 50-Cz Sar� � is#ri�t�3 ��� 4Ll ���� Can i' ate 9�;823� 9A��55�822 1 7�
Westgate Dr Coffey Dr Westglen Dr 944-3A Res District 3 40 Candidate $ 16,949 $ 94,372,770 1 3 5 7
23 0. 23
Reasons Legend
1 Insufficient Funds
�---------------------------------------------------------�
2 Water Concern
�---------------------------------------------------------�
3 Wastewater Concern
�---------------------------------------------------------�
4 Drainage CIP
�---------------------------------------------------------�
5 Low Traffic Volume
�---------------------------------------------------------�
6 Fragmentation
�---------------------------------------------------------�
7 OCI Too High
�---------------------------------------------------------�
8 Existing Streets CIP
�---------------------------------------------------------�
9 Anticipated Development
� � " � i • � � •:'i-
Citizens Bond Advisory Committee �CBAC� process and
focus for the upcoming bond prog ram.
Review street reconstruction recommendations from the
CBAC.
Review Public Art Committee recommendations.
�
� . � � �, � ; �I � I, ' � � �
To address deteriorating street conditions, a bond
program is proposed by the Citizens Bond Advisory
Committee �CBAC�.
Committee met on April 23rd, May 7t", May 21 St, June
4th, and June 1 1 th to discuss the condition of existing
streets and potential recommendations.
.�� Also conducted tour of City streets on May 26t".
� Focus has been to improve the worst streets in the
community.
.�� Focused on streets with an OCI rating of 40 or less �on a
100 point scale, 40 is considered to be poor�.
Presented preliminary recommendations to the Planning
and Zoning Commission on June bth.
� � � � � � � � .r .r. � . � ;
- CBAC also initiated a public information campaign
in May to solicit feedback from the community.
v:� Committee received a number of recommendations
from the public.
v:� Each recommendation was d iscussed specifica I ly by the
Committee to determine whether it should be
recommended.
v:� Due to citizen feed back, Scri pture Street from Ector to
Malone was added to the list of proposed projects.
� i � � �
In 2006, the City Council approved a Public Art Policy
which states:
=� "The City of Denton shall include a base of 2% for the arts
from all future Capital Improvement Programs, with the
option and flexibility to increase to a 4% maximum, based
on needs and econom ic cond itions."
.�� Based on this policy, $400K to $800K would need to be
reserved from the proposed $20 million street bond
program for public art.
To address this issue, the City Council also asked the
Citizens Bond Advisory Committee to provide a
recommendation on whether the Public Art policy should
be implemented.
� � � � • �• •
- On May 7t", the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee
voted to recommend that the Public Art Policy be
applied to the upcoming bond program.
- On May 15t", the City Counci I recommended that
2% �$400K� be included for public art in the
upcoming bond program.
- The City Counci I a Iso asked the Publ ic Art
Committee to develop project recommendations.
�
�
� � • i .' +/ •
.- The Citizens Bond Advisory Committee is now recommending
a$20.4 million bond program for the November 2012
election.
� Proposed primarily for Street Infrastructure.
-� Approximately $4.0 million is expected to be sold each year
over a five year period.
.- $20 million of bond program is intended to be only used for
the reconstruction of existinq streets.
� Funding is intended to complement increased street maintenance
funding.
� Will not replace need to increase maintenance funding over time.
.- $400K is also planned for Public Art �2% of bond
program�.
- Bond program assumes no tax rate increase.
� Debt will be layered in as existing debt is retired.
�
� . � � �, � ; �I � I, ' � � �
.- Approximately 990 street segments were identified to have
an OCI rating of 40 or less.
� Due to condition of streets, additional maintenance is no longer
appropriate.
� Streets in this category need full reconstruction.
.�- Approximately $96 million is needed to reconstruct streets
that have an OCI rating of 40 or less.
�$66 million is needed for streets with an OCI rating of 30 or less.
-�� As a result, not all streets can be reconstructed in this bond
program.
.- The Committee has identified preliminary recommendations
provided in Exhibit l.
� The reasons for not selecting certain street segments is also
identified.
.�- The following slides provide some pictures of streets which
a re recommended to be funded.
�
�
�
�
�'
�
�.
�
�
�
��uuuui� �,
��
�
�
�
�
�'
�
�.
�
�
N
����I�JJ,� �
����� �
�
�
�
�
�'
�
�.
�
�
J
�
�
�'
�
J
�u�Pll(6���� y
III�
w, ��, ,�'
;hw , o
�; .
��
�
� ;
��� ��,��;
��o,�- � �,
, : �� �. ��
� ���ij i�i
� ■ ► ��
� -
� '
w � ����4��� �
� � ��j �
� �
� ����,�
_
�'���• �R�
'� � y�.�' ��
._�.w �i._ � _ .
..- ,..__�� I III! ���.. ._ ., ,.� �1
� � ■ ■■e:� ; : ..� f � :: '� � � �-.
!F���_. - ... � , +��� � r �� �; ;
IC . �1' _ ■'._ `' �■ 'll I� ��1 �� r� � , �
'- ~` - ■w +w.■�� .
� ������. I-_� e�.�� � r�� �_ � �
=___.__ —
� � _
.�� .- �
■. i . �.
�
`��1 � �I��
�
�
�!'
�
��a r � .
� �� ��
� . �
� � � � ` f � . � f � � . ` ' '� ` � � � � . � s i _
� � � � � � +� #
� � #
����
� � �� '� �� _
�
� i � � � �
.- The Public Art Committee has also developed
recommendations on the upcoming bond program.
.- The Public Art Committee met on May 24t" and May 30t" to
d iscuss potenti a l recommend ations.
.- On June 1 St, the Committee formally recommended that
Public Art be incorporated into the I-35 corridor.
� Will be constructed as the I-35 project is completed.
� Intent is to incorporate artistic designs into concrete retaining wall
panels on overpasses.
� Other elements may also be incorporated based on final design
of the I-35 roadway.
.- The following slides provide some pictures of similar projects
and a rendering of some designs specific to Denton.
� Exact design elements will be determined by the Public Art
Committee in the future.
�'
�
�
�
�
.:
�
�
�
�
�
�
l, »���
u���rrrr� ��
�'
�
�
�
�
.:
�
�
�
�
�
�
J
j,°:;°; I
��
�'
�
�
�
�
.:
�
�
�
�
�
�
»»),,, �u,»,, �
�
. _ � .� �_ � �,�,� �
� .�
'�E�.�.T}{ETiC bESiGt� �UfP3ELSh9E5 ��`
l�etes: t-- �e ai^i,^g ?J°1�=1s - AccE�t
• v�r.�phic F�,r�zl iu G� parfo-€�ted �1!aminurr� p2r=et, pr u�si cc �:recast
f�r�m4ir�er.
- Gr.?phir T�nei tr be =_onfinzG =�3 an��`mant �ai,ei re€�Ir�n ar,lY-
- :€.3��#�i�: �,.�a.��l i.a hcr s f..zi ;rorTf :tFkuln.:s�f p,�€iz�E<; aniraian_t€� E.; ?.`
�rtu a €rr�ax�.irr�u�€rt �I 8°.
� F1I3d1 dl'C iY�Ji k'[JI' yi3{1I'til�.`. ji31791 .:1F1.{C31'� 52EcGCIG��i"t L.`� L'Jr2 C:3,31 L11F1.�[t��3
VYIL���? �E}�39}j�j�.��j�y �I' IB"FS�I:S1ite1l"F.
.• I��teth�� �` �ppt€c..��6�n ro 6e cer,sistert tt��rc�caqh *he� c�rrfu�r.
• Hrtt�i�r�rit r.�:f�n t�� b€ mt.,rrr��r Irr�� :e fr�r �p�p.t3slte sl�e at��:trn�r.t_
- 17t�3t:^�1 ,Rrtw<�r��t fcir� �-srrx���.,:�?; :.�'i�xn� tn h;- �rr�vl�lr�cy =n r�-�:rt:�e:i�n�.r
Caurt Ho[�se [�?�ti���.cn C��i•�ti'�.on
Lnnr. S*a€ Gp�it�rr �I ,..u�?f�.i�rrr *Fr'�-'We rG3��?gite sI�� anuSmettts vr� ���t m3�'t'r�r 1��nai7'.2
Eas�1e C?�}3�srn Fl<=��ili�,rr
������.� ��.������� ����
����� ���rta�r�rrt �� Z��ra���r��t�c��
�n
� �
� � � � � � '� � � �
- J uly 17t" — City Counci I d iscusses p roject
recommendations and bond proposition options.
- July - October — Citizens Bond Advisory Committee
conducts public education campaign.
- August 7t" — City Council holds public hearing.
- August 14t" — City Council calls for bond election.
- November bt" — Bond election date.
s:Oleg�all�ar documents\orclin�tnces\12\tront� eleu�t�i�r�n.��7cx
OEt.I7I�IANCE� N(�. 2012-
Al`�( ()RTJINANCE C�F' THE CITY CC7UNCII�, OT' T�-iE ��1'i�Y �7F UEN7'ON, TEXAS, CAI:,LINCi AN
�,LECTION TCJ SE HFI:,D ON NOVF;ME3EFZ 6, 2Q12, WI'I"HIN S�ID CITY (7N T�IE f�[JESrI'1(JiV (7F
THE ISS[JANCF; C7ti $20,��J(),000 1A1 AD VALIJREM "["A??�� SUPPOR.TGI� PUBLIC S�,CURITIES F'OR
STREE`I' Al�lll Ii.�LE1TED PUBLIC ART IMPROVF;MBN'I'S; MAKING P�(7VIS1C7N FOR,. TI-IF;
C4NDUCT C►F THE F[.�[;C'I'I(71�J; AND CC7NTAIN:ING C7THE[� PRC7VISIC7NS INCIDEN°�"AL
THEI�I:TU; ANL� L�ECLAI�iNG AN EFFEC'I'IVE 17�TF?.
WHE;RI;AS, ihe City Cauncil (th� "City Council") ��rf' tl�e City c�f Dentc�n, Texas (the "Cit�,'>)
finds anci deter77aii�es t�11at� �n electit,n sh�ulr� fc�i�t�hwit�h be c�lled a�1� l�c�ld i�a �fh�: CiC�y for tk7c }��Xr�ose of
subzr�itting a propasiti�» fc�r the issuancc of' aci valax-e�rr tax supported public securities fc�r the purposes
herein set �forth; aric�
WH:F�IZEA�i, it is �ar<7vi�ecl in Secti��i 3.004 c�f tl�e T�x�s �lectic��7 Code that the gc�vei�ning brady
af the C;ity shall order �;IECti�ns pu�rtaining tc� r���inicipal a.ffair�;, �;ive »otice anci ap�oiz�t electi�all cr�f'i�icers
tc� hold the el�ct�ioi�►; a�xc1
WHF;F�EAS, the C�ity C�;���rlcil finds t�hat� the date a�t which said election shall be held is at least
seventy-eight ('78) d�ys aftez� t�xe c�ate tl�is ordina.nce is a�da�t�ed; I'JC7W, '�["HEREF(�tZ.E,
THE CQUNCII:, (�F Tt-�F C'I'I"Y ()F llEN'I"Ol�t HEIiESY C7�DATNS:
SECT1�0?�f :1. "I'he statetnent,s cc�ntia�ir�ed ii� tlie �rean7bl� tcr this a�rclinance ax�� hereby adop�ed as
f"indings crf iact a�«d as a part o�`ttze �perative �r•ovisiar7s here�>�f'.
SECTIC7I�J 2. An electiui� shall k�e held between the haurs of �:00 �1,M. ai�d 7:00 P.M. on
N�c�v�mber 6, 2012 in the City, far ihe purpose of s��bn�►itting to tl�e voters c��F xtie C:ity a ballot prr�position
t�hat autl�c�rizes the iss����nce c�f p�ablic sectxr�ities sLKppc�rted by ad valarem ta.xes, at the pollin�; places
desi�n�te� by the Uentan Gc�uniy Eleciicrrxs Adrninis�ratc�r (�he "�,lections Ac�aa�in�iwtrat�crr-") in �cco�-da►rtce
wit.h the provisiozxs of� � jaint electioi� agreement �:nd c�antr��ct fc�r electic�az sct�vices witl� t�he Elections
Adrninistra�tc�r (the "Corrt�ra�ct°'), which tl�►e City MaY�a��er c�r Assistan� �izy Mana�er is hereby ��utharized
tc� execut� i�x the namr� of" saicl City, The lcrcatic���s of such pollii��; pla�c�s s�re set forth ir� Exhibit A
attached hereto. Exhibit A sl�all l�e modified tc� inelucie additicrnal crr° dii"fere�i�t election d�y pollin�; �laces
desig�nated by the Elections �1�dn7inist�rat�or a��d to cc�nform to �he Cox�tract.
�i�;C".TIOIw1 3. That all thz electior�� of��cers desi�;nated kry the Electioi�s Ac��ninistr-��tar ar� hereby
appa�intec� a.nd confirrned tc� t�c,ld �aid e�lection at saic� pc�lling places.
SEC'1�I(71�1 4. �I"h��t, as cieter�mineci by the El�ctions Adn��ir�istr•atc�r, the presidin� jud�es shall
appc�,int nc�t less than twcr nor mc,re than five quali�ed el�ctic�n clerks to serve ar�d assist in condueting
saici election; prc�vi�ing that if thc }aresiding judge actually serves as expected, the alt�rnate }�residin�;
judge shall be a��e c�f suc;h clerks.
�'�;C°�I'ION� �. 7"hat earty v47ti�ng s17a11 kre cr�nducted t�y personal a��pearance at the lc�cati�>ns, ciates
and tames set f'�rtl� i�� Exhibit I3 attached hereto and during the perir�d early votin� is required or permitted
by la.w, �reirig CJct�c�ber 22, 2U12 ti�rou�h �Nc�ve�7iber 2, 2012. Exhibii B s17a11 l�e rnodiiied t�a include
additional or differe�nt eaz•ly wotit7� lacations desi�;��a�tcci Yr�y the Electic��7s �dministratc�r ancl to cc�z��E'c�r����� t�.c�
the C'c�ntract. 1�pplications fax° ballot by mail must be rec�,ived na later tl�an the close of` business on
(7ctober 30, 2012. A�}�licatic�ns tc�r early votin� by anail �rtust be srabmitted to the follc�win�; address:
s:Ue�al\o�rr dc7cumeats�ordiaX��ttces01211�c�nd el�cti�»�.r�ocx
1�ra��k I't7illips
Elccfiic�ns �dministra�tcrr
4U1 W. Hickc��y, S�xitc 12S
Dezxton, Texas 76201-9U26
�i�;C"�I'1�CJN_6. '1'hat an e�rly ball�t�� board is l�ea�eby creaied to process early v�ating result�s, a�i7d the
i��r�ivic�ual desi�;r�aied by the �lections Adn�il7istrat�ar is he�rel�y app�inteci the pr�sicling judge of said
t�oard. T��c pi°esidiy7� jud�;e s17a11 ap�e�int a�t l�ast twc� c�ther metnbers of tl�e board.
SECTI�ON 7. T�hc rnethcrd of" v�oting ia7 saici electicrn sh�11 �b� l�y k�allots t�hat� cc�iif�orm to the
requireme��ts c�f the Texas Electian Cocie. An eiectre�zxic ve�tin� systc�n, r.isin� optically seann�d ballats
meeting tl�e rec�uire�nei�ts aF C��apt�er 124 af the Texas F;l�ction Ccrcie, m�y I�e Lascci fc�r the el�ctioi7.
P'reparatian c�f tl�u ��ecessary equipxzaent ar�d official ballats far the electic��� sha11 cc�l�afc�r�n tcr thc
require�ner�ts o�`the Texas Electian Code,
SECTI�ON $. All resic�ent, q��rali�ed electars of said City shall b� eni�itlet� to vc�te at said election.
SEC;T;I(JI'� 9. A substat7tial ca�y aF this ardinance sl�all serve as propc;r nc�tice af Y1�e El�ction,
which nr�tice �l�all �b� g�iven �ry pastin� substantial copies of this c�rdiz���ac:e in bath Er�glisl�x and Spanish c�n
t1�e bulleti�n board a.t tl�c City ���a11 crf the City used fc�r the prrstin� o�t' ��7c�iiccs r�f` 7nee�tings c��f ilze Ciiy
Caunci�l af t�he C;ity and at t�hr�e (3) r�ther pul�lic places witirit� the City nat� latei� than tl�e twenty-first
(21st} day �ricrr to the date upon whiuh the Flectio�n �is io be he1d; anc� substantial cc�pies r�f'tlais c�rdir��a�r�c�
in �c�tla English and Spanisl� s1�a11 b� pti�blished c�n the same day in each of two (2) successive weeks in a
news�paper o�f �ene�ral circ�ila�icrt7 ir� �tl7e City, t17e da�t�e of` thc �rst publicatic�n to be trot less t1�an seventeen
(17) days r��ir rnore tl�ian thirty (3(�) days priar ta t1�e da:te <7�£tlze Election.
SE�TION 1(7. The City Secretary, City of Cier►ton, is here�y �•espc�rtsible for any necessary
sulamissic�rls to the U.S. IJepartment c��l" J��astice tc�r pi°eclearance af said election unci�r t��1e Fec�era.l Votin�!
[�igl�ts Act.
�"EC"�C'IO�N 1 l.. At sz�id el��tic�n t�17e tollawir�� PRC7PCJS1'T'IC7N sliall be su�mitted in accorc�ar�ce
with law:
F'i2.C1P(�SITIC)T�J 1`�O. l
Shall tl7e City Cc���ncil c�f tk�c� Ci�t�y� a�f Dez�t����� bu aut.l�orized to issue pu�lic securities c,f
said City,, in one c�r ir►c�re se;ric;s c�r iss�►�s, i��7 the a�gregate �rir�cipal aina��tlt of
$20,400,f�00, wi4�la the public securiti�s c�f' each srich series r�r issue, r�spectively, tc7
mature serially withii�t not to ext;ee� thiriy y�a�rs Crca��x their date, anc� f� be solcl ati� such
��eices and bear interest at such rates, not ta �xc��d the max�iin�,�rn rat�s perrnititi�d by I��w
at the respective times af' issuance, as s17a11 be determined withi�x the discretian af the
City Cauncil, far the purpc�se oFtl�e aequisitian of �rc��erty and makin�; improv�ments fcrr
public purposes in said City, to-wit: constri�ctizx�;, reco�nst��uctin�, r�structurit�g� a�t�d
extendin� streets, rc�adways, bridges, overpasses, pedestria��ways, sidewalks, landscaping,
streetscapes, collectors, stora�n drains, si�na�izatian, signa�e, ather tra£�c an� signal
cc�ntrc�ls, street 1igl�tin� and inediau improve�nents; ��p ta $4�0,000 of such principal
amocmt for acc�uirirrg, canstructing and installing }�ublic art i°elated tc� and bein� part of
scaxne o�° all ot thc foregoin�, the acquisition af land far the fc>re�c7i��g; and improvements
related to the faregoin�; an� sl7all saic� City C,,�7uncil be authorized tc� �levy a�id cause ta Le
assess�d a�nc! call�.cted a��nua1 ad va�l�rem ta�es in an amo��nt sufficient� tc� pay 1he ar�n�ia1
interest crn saicl public securities and prc�vicie a si�xki��g� fund tcr pay said ���ikrlie securities
at matLarity'?
Page 2
s:Alwg��tl\�>ur c�oeurr�ei7ts\ar�inancxsOl2lband elwcCion.dc�c:x
SECTION 12. Tlxe official ba{]ats for said electian shall be prepared i�� accordance with the
'1"exas Elec:tio��7 Cod� sr� as tc pertnit t�he electors tc� vc�te "HOR" c�r "AG�C`f�I�ST>' �tl�e aforesaid
PROPOStT1C7N, with the ballats to contain such provisions, �narkin�s and larigi:iage as requirec� by law,
a»d with sucl7 I'iZC7I'OSITION �ko be �xpressed substantially as follcr�ws:
PRC�P4�S17"I(7l`J N(7. ]
FC7R
TE-iE ISSUf1NC,E OF $20,40(l,0()0 ()IA PU�3LIC:
S1;ClJP,.ITIES FC)R S'I'It�;L,'I" iMF'RCIVEMEN"CS WI'T'[-I
UE' TO $400,000 CJF SUC,F-I A1VIC)i.Jl'VT TOR
RLLATEII) PLJF3LIC A[tPI, IMPRC)VEMEN`I"S
AGAINST
SECTiC7N 13. In accordance with Article 9, Sec. �.02(c)(1) crf` the City Charter, it is l�ereby
1"aund atrd determi�ted that fihe probable periad c�f usef"ulness af the propnsed 'unprovements covered l�y
tl�e afaresaid l'E2OI'OS[TIO�I is 30 years.
S:EC'i"iC)1�1 14. Article �, �ec. �.02(c)(6) r�f'the City Ghartel� ccrntains tl7e fc�llawin� pravisian a���c�
require� this electic�n ordinance tc� ciistinctly sp�;cify:
"� cleterminaiian o�f t11e l�et debt c�f the Cit�y a�I'ter iss�i�nce of the b�mds
tl�eref�y� �uthc�r°izeci, tog�tl�er with a c�cclaration tl7at the l�onds thereby
autharizec� will �be within a11 debt ai�d �ather lir�zitations pr�scr�ib�d by th�
�onstitution and l�ws ��f the State c�f Texas".
T17e detern7irration is hereby macie th��t th�; net clebt of` the� G�ity after the issuanc� c�f the bc7nds
17erein proposec� to be subc��►itted will be r7crt tnc�re than $134,339,700 and it is l�erc�ry declared tl7at said
�;ener�l c��bli�atic�i� bonds will be within a11 debt a��d c�ther limit�atic���� }7re�cribed t�y the Cc��7stitutic�i� and
laws af the Stat� oti Texa�.
SECTICJI'�1 1S. Tlaat i�rt all r�spe�cts said elec�ioi�� s��l�all be co�lduct�d �i�� accorc�anc� witl� the Tax�s
Electian Cadc. 1,he City Secretary is autharized tc� prepare the c�fficial ballcrt for t}�e electic�i� and perfc�rm
every act requir•ed by the City Charter, the laws ��I" tl7e Stati�; of T"exas and all oth�r a�plicable laws fc�r
holdin�; electic�ns.
SECTION 16. This ordinance l�e��eby incarpor�tes �the p�rovisic�i�s o[" the. Contract, and tcr ihe
extent �af a.n�y c;e���flict betw��n thi� a�•dinance �nd th� C'c�ntr�ct, tl�e pz°ovisic�rls o�F the Ca���tract shall
contrc�l. rI`he City Mana�er and Assistaa�t City Mana�;er are each hereby authe�rized ta ccrrrec�t, mc�dify c��°
change the in�formatic�n �in t.he attached Exhibits bas�d txpon the final Ic�catians, dates and times agreed
upo�n by the Flectior�s �sdministrat�ar and the C'it.y as well as iixcc�rpora�t� adcii�lior►a1 c�r diff�ercnt votii��
tcrcaticans as ciesigna�tecl �by t:he Electiot7s Administ�r°atc�r.
SEC'I"IO]"� 17. I�t� is tzer4by c�ff�icia.11y fc��Nnci and deter��iniz�ed tliai the meeting� ��t which tl�is
ordi��ax�ce i� passed w�as �pen tc� the public as requireci a�i�d that public rxat��ice� af the tinie, place, at�d
purpose af said meeting was given as required by the Ope��► Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas
Gover°nment Code.
SECTTON l 8. T1�is c�rdinance shall l�ecc>me effective immediately upan iis passage and approval.
Pa�e 3
s:Ale:��allvur docun�ents\ordin���nces\121bc�n�l el�ct'ion.�lc�cx
PASSF.T7 A,NI7 A�'PRC7VED this th�, ____ day of` __, 2012.
MARK A. �3U12�ZC7UGIIS, MAYOR
�,TTEST:
J�;�NII�"�;R WALTERS, CITY S�;t;RFTARY
U'.�
APP120VE,T� AS TO LECiE1L Ii0I2.M:
ANI"1"A BURGESS, CITY ATTC)RNEY
,
� �,.�.�.
.m . �
r��r ..�"` �'�%°° �__., , ,,�-'' ��
L3 1 : .,,,M� � �._� d � � � .. ������'�
.___ � �.... r�� _.____.........
� �� �,,,, . ' �,������
BONL� �1T"I,ORNI;YS
l'a�e 4
s:Ueg�nllErur doc�un�nts\drdiitanr,e51121b�rncf elecCicrn.dcrcx
Denton Christian Church
3130 T*I. Elrn, Uenton, Texas
I'recinc� I�to. 1009
Fi.re Statian �4
� t] 0�herrnan I7rive, I7entt�n, Texas
E'recinct i�tc�. 1012
Dex�ia l2.ecreation Center
1001 Parvin, Denton, Texas
Precinct Na. 4004
I� irst I3aptlst Cl�urch of Denton
1100 Malone, I7enton, Texas
E"recinct No, 4007
McMath Middle Schoal
19QU Jas�YZ, Dentan, '1�"exas
Precinct Nr�s. 1O14, 1 U 1 S, 4014, 40 �l 5
Carria�e klc�use Assi:;t�.c� Livin�;
1357 F3ernard St., I7Ent�n, 'i"exa�s
Precinct N�ys. 4OU�3, 4013
EX��3F31'I' A
ELEC'I'Idl� dAY PC7l,i1[NG PLACES
Cc�pper Creek E3a�tist Chur°ch
4582 Fashtrap Fic�,, C7entcrn, Texas
Precinct No. 1010
Singing (7aks C;htzrch af �lzrist
1 f� 1 Cardinal, i��nton, 7'ex�s
F'recir�ct No. 1013
Nr�rth t.akes R.ee. Cent�r
2001 W. W�i�ndsnr IJr., Dentor7, �I'exas
Precinct Nc�, 4()OS
Martin I.uthc;r Kin� Jr. Fiec. Center
]30� Wilsr�n, I)enton, I�"exas
I'r�;ci:nct Nr�. 4011
Southmont Baptist Church
2$0'1 Pera��sylv�nia Dr., Dentc�ia,, `I`exa�y
f�r�cinct Nos. 1016, 101'7, 1018
Denton Civic Ce�xter
321 �;. McKin��ey, Dentc�n, Texas
Pr�cinct Nos. 4009, 4a l 0
Towne 1�lortl� Baptist Cl�ur�ch
526 F-lercules, L7e��tc�n, 7"exas
Pr�cinct Na. lUl l
Robsoa Etanch
9400 Ld Robsa�� 131vd,, Dentan, Texas
Precinct Na. 4003
�I'rinity G'resbyte��ian
22q0 l�t. Bell, Dent«n, 1"ex�s
Precil�ct No. 4(i06
}'ec�n Creek I;l�mentary
4400 Lalceview Blvd., Denton, Texas
I'reeinct Na. 4012
C3uyer High School
7501 T�:a51cy Lane, L7entcrrr, 'l�'€xas
Precinct N��. 101 �, 4016
s:Alegal\�7ur clocumEn�Cs\c�rdic�a�nces112\b�>ni1 electioi�.cl�?cx
F,X�iII�31�I' I3
EAR[.Y VC7"T"ING SITES AND NC�[JRS
'�1"he fallowing earl�y voting l�rcations will be open tlYe dates �nd t�imes listed:
Manday—F^riday C)ctober 22-26 �am—Spm
Sat��.lyday (Jctaber 27 7am—'7�am
Sunclay (Jctaber 28 Ipm--6pm.
Manday-1^riclay C7ctober 29-�Navember 2 7am-7pzn
Steven E C��nelan� Csovernment� Center Lewisville Munic%�„al Ar�ncx
1400 F'M 424, Crass Roads l 197 W. Main St�reet, L�wisville
Ju�tin Municinal Camplex
415 N. College, J��stin
Joseph A. Carrall A�lministr�tion 13uildin�
401 W. Hickory, Dentc7n
L ake Ll�allas Cit �-Y Iall
212 Main Street, i.,ake Dallas
�"lower Mound Police and Municipal Court Building
415Q Kirkpatrick, Flc�wer Maund
Uentan Cauntv A�ministrative Cam�lex — Health Department
s3S s L,c�c7}� 2$8, I7ez�tc�r7
Carrqlltc�n �'ublic I.ibrary
4220 �t. .losey, Carrollton.
Fr�nkford Tawn Homes
18110 Marsh I:,n., Dallas
Hi�t►land Villa�e Municipal Complex
10(�O I-Ii�;hland Villa�,e It,c�., Highldnc� Village
Argyle Town Hall
:�OE� IJ��nt��>n St., Argyle
Fri�ca Fire Statian #'7
33C1 W Stunebrnok }�k�wy,, Frisca
"Cl�e fc�llawing early voi�in�; locations will C)NGYbe o}aen tl7e e�ates arrd t9m�s listed:
Svare Municinal Buitdin�; Monday — Friday Octaber 22 — 26 8am — 5pm
100 l�Iu�nic�ipal C7rive, '�l�"rophy Clr�b Saturday October 27 7am — ipm
Monday -- i"riday 4�ctc�ber 29 -- Nc�vember 2 7am -- 7prrt
Christ C�mmunity Church
64d4 1'ai�e Rd., 'I"he Colony
First Bap,tist Church of San�er
708 S. Stl� St., Sarr�;�r
First Baptist Church of Rc�an�ke
209 1V. F'ine, Roanoke
Carinth Citv Ha11
3300 Corinth I'kwy., Ce�rii�tth
M<rnday -- l�riday
s�Y�,�-��y
r��na�y -- �r��Sa�y
Wed:nesday
'I"hursday _ Pric�ay
Monday — F'riday
Saturday
Monday — Tuesday
Wecinesc�ay
'I"hursday — Frid�y
Manday — Friciay
Saturday
Mo��day -- Tuesday
Wecinesday
Thursday — Friday
lVlanday — Tuesday
'T"hursday Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Mcanday Wednesday
Thursday
Fri day
October 22 -�- 26
oCto��� z�
actober 29 -- 30
f�ctober 31
Ncrv�;t�r�ber 1 - 2
(')ct�obe.r 22 — 26
Octobcr� 27
oGtQ��r 2a — �a
(7ctaber 31
Noveznbei° 1 - 2
Octc�l�er 22 - 26
Octabet° 2"7
(7ctabex� 29 — 30
Clctol�er 31
Navember I - 2
Octaber 22 — 2�
Clctober 2S -- 26
October 27
C7ctc�ber 2�
C7ctober 29 — 31
l�lavember l
November 2
8am — 5pm
'7am — 7pm
��,� — ��,�,.
'7am — Spm
7arn — 7pm
Sa�m � - Spzn
'7a��r '7prn
���� — ��„�.
iam _ Spm
7am — 7pm
$am — Spm
7am — 7pm
"lam —'7pm
7arn — S�m
7ar�n — 7pm
�am Spm
8am — Spm
7�m — 7pm
] prn — 6prn
7arn — 7}�m
7am — 5}�m
7am — 7}�m