Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 10, 2013 AgendaAGENDA CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL December 10, 2013 After determining in Open Session that a quorum is present, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas will convene in a Closed Session on Tuesday, December 10, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. in the City Council Work Session Room at City Hall, 215 E. McKinney Street, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: A. Consultation with Attorney — Under Texas Government Code Section 551.071. 1. Consultation with the City's attorneys regarding legal advice concerning the leasing of land and financing of a proposed Hotel /Convention Center facility of University of North Texas property located at I -35 and North Texas Boulevard where a public discussion of this legal matter would conflict with the duty of the City's attorneys to the City Council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas. 2. Consult with and provide direction to City's attorneys regarding legal issues and strategies associated with Gas Well Ordinance regulation of gas well drilling and production within the City Limits and the extraterritorial jurisdiction, including Constitutional limitations, statutory limitations upon municipal regulatory authority, statutory preemption and /or impacts of federal and state law and regulations as it concerns municipal regulatory authority and matters relating to enforcement of the ordinance. B. Certain Public Power Utilities: Competitive Matters — Under Texas Government Code, Section 551.086; and Consultation with Attorneys — Under Texas Government Code, Section 551.071. I. Receive a presentation from Denton Municipal Electric ( "DME ") staff regarding certain public power competitive, financial and commercial information relating to issues regarding purchased power pricing and other public power information that is contained in the Purchase Power Agreement by and between the City of Denton, Texas who is selling power and electric energy services to the University of North Texas. Discuss, deliberate, consider a recommendation of approval of, and take final action on said Agreement. Consultation with the City's attorneys regarding legal issues associated and related to the Purchase Power Agreement described above where a public discussion of these legal matters would conflict with the duty of the City's attorneys to the City of Denton and the Denton City Council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas, or would jeopardize the City's legal position in any administrative proceeding or potential litigation. C. Deliberations regarding Real Property — Under Texas Government Code, Section 551.072; and Consultation with Attorneys — Under Texas Government Code, Section 551.071. City of Denton City Council Agenda December 10, 2013 Page 2 1. Discuss, deliberate and receive information from staff and provide staff with direction pertaining to the potential purchase of certain real property interests located in the James Perry Survey, Abstract No. 1040; John Scott Survey, Abstract No. 1222; John Bacon Survey, Abstract No. 1541; and the John Davis Survey, Abstract No. 326, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and generally located along Western Boulevard between Airport Road and Jim Christal Road. Consultation with the City's attorneys regarding legal issues associated with the potential acquisition and condemnation of the real property described above where a public discussion of these legal matters would conflict with the duty of the City's attorneys to the City of Denton and the Denton City Council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas, or would jeopardize the City's legal position in any administrative proceeding or potential litigation. 2. Discuss, deliberate, and receive information from staff and provide staff with direction pertaining to the acquisition of real property interests located in (1) the James Edmonson Survey, Abstract Number 400, Denton County, Texas (located generally on Roselawn Drive, 600 feet east of South Bonnie Brae Street), in the City of Denton, Texas; and (2) in the James Edmonson Survey, Abstract No. 400, Denton County, Texas, located generally in the 3100 Block of South Bonnie Brae Street, in Denton County, Texas. Consultation with the City's attorneys regarding legal issues associated with the acquisition or condemnation of the real property interests referenced above where a public discussion of these legal matters would conflict with the duty of the City's attorneys to the City of Denton and Denton City Council under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas, or would jeopardize the City's legal position in any administrative proceedings or potential litigation. (Bonnie Brae Street Widening and Improvements proj ect) Note: The City Council reserves the right to adjourn into a Closed Meeting on any item on its Open Meeting agenda consistent with Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, or as otherwise allowed by law. Following the completion of the Closed Session, the City Council will convene in a 2" a Tuesday Session to consider the following: NOTE: A Work Session is used to explore matters of interest to one or more City Council Members or the City Manager for the purpose of giving staff direction into whether or not such matters should be placed on a future regular or special meeting of the Council for citizen input, City Council deliberation and formal City action. At a Work Session, the City Council generally receives informal and preliminary reports and information from City staff, officials, members of City committees, and the individual or organization proposing council action, if invited by City Council or City Manager to participate in the session. Participation by individuals and members of organizations invited to speak ceases when the Mayor announces the session is being closed to public input. Although Work Sessions are public meetings, and citizens have a legal right to attend, they are not public hearings, so citizens are not allowed to participate in the session unless invited to do so by the Mayor. Any citizen may supply to the City Council, prior to the City of Denton City Council Agenda December 10, 2013 Page 3 beginning of the session, a written report regarding the citizen's opinion on the matter being explored. Should the Council direct the matter be placed on a regular meeting agenda, the staff will generally prepare a final report defining the proposed action, which will be made available to all citizens prior to the regular meeting at which citizen input is sought. The purpose of this procedure is to allow citizens attending the regular meeting the opportunity to hear the views of their fellow citizens without having to attend two meetings. 1. Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding a proposed Hotel /Convention Center. 2. Receive a report, hold a discussion and provide direction regarding options to improve pedestrian accessibility including the restriction of vehicle access in the 100 block of Walnut Street. Following the completion of the 2" a Tuesday Session, the Council will convene in a Special Called Session to consider the following: 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the Denton Convention Center Project Master Development Agreement between the City of Denton, Texas (City), the University of North Texas (UNT), O'Reilly Hotel Partners Denton, LLC (OHPD), and O'Reilly Hospitality Management, LLC (OHM) and including Exhibits A through H thereof to wit: Exhibit "A" City -UNT Land Lease, Exhibit "B" City —OHPD Convention Center Sublease, Exhibit "C" OHPD -UNT Land Lease, Exhibit "D" Preliminary Site Plan, Exhibit "E" Professional Services Agreement for Constriction- Manager -Agent (CMA), Exhibit "F" Professional Services Agreement - Architect or Engineer, Exhibit "G" Contractor Payment Guidelines, Exhibit "H" Hospitality Management Guidelines; and providing and effective date. 2. Consider nominations /appointments to the City's Boards and Commissions: A. Citizens Bond Advisory Committee 3. Under Section 551.042 of the Texas Open Meetings Act, respond to inquiries from the City Council or the public with specific factual information or recitation of policy, or accept a proposal to place the matter on the agenda for an upcoming meeting AND Under Section 551.0415 of the Texas Open Meetings Act, provide reports about items of community interest regarding which no action will be taken, to include: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; an honorary or salutary recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen; a reminder about an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing body; information regarding a social, ceremonial, or community event organized or sponsored by an entity other than the governing body that was attended or is scheduled to be attended by a member of the governing body or an official or employee of the municipality; or an announcement involving an imminent threat to the public health and safety of people in the municipality that has arisen after the posting of the agenda. Following the completion of the Special Called Session, the Council will convene in a Closed Session to consider the following: City of Denton City Council Agenda December 10, 2013 Page 4 A. Deliberation regarding personnel matters — Under Texas Government Code Section 551.074. I. Deliberate and discuss the evaluation, duties, discipline, procedures, and contracts of the Municipal Court Judge, City Attorney, and City Manager. CERTIFICATE I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of 2013 at o'clock (a.m.) (p.m.) CITY SECRETARY NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION ROOM IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 349 -8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800 - RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE. Woo Ik seG,sk)11 °� I. AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: December 10, 2013 DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office ACM: Jon Fortune K SUBJECT Receive a report, hold a discussion and give staff direction regarding a proposed Hotel /Convention Center BACKGROUND The City has considered many proposals to constrict a convention center over the past few years in pursuant to the long standing objective to provide adequate convention center facilities to meet community needs and to encourage and promote economic development through convention and tourism related activity. More recently, staff received a proposal from O'Reilly Hospitality Management (OHM) that we believe has all the necessary elements for a successful project. The major development concepts of the OHM proposal were originally identified in January 2012, in a non - binding Memorandum of Preliminary Agreement (MOPA) between the City, OHM and the University of North Texas (UNT). Since then, staff has been working from the MOPA to negotiate and draft a development agreement to build a convention center and convention center hotel. Following the completion of extensive negotiations, the parties have now successfully reached consensus on the terms necessary to finalize the development agreements and realize the City's goal of building a convention center. If approved, the project would include a convention center funded and constricted by the City and an upscale hotel connected to the convention center constricted by O'Reilly Hotel Partners Denton (OHPD). Both facilities would be located on property owned by the UNT near Apogee Stadium and leased to the City and OHPD. The proposal includes plans for the City to sub -lease the convention center to OHPD which would be operated and managed by OHM (same operator as the hotel). The size of the convention center is an approximate 100,000 sq /ft facility and includes an approximate 30,000 sq /ft ballroom. It will be designed to handle very large events and be able to accommodate approximately 2,000 for banquet style seating. The City would fund and own the convention center which is estimated to cost $25 million. It is important to note that the City would be funding the convention center only and not the hotel. The hotel is planned to be an Embassy Suites of approximately 318 rooms (twelve stories tall), but at a minimum will have 275 rooms (nine stories tall) and includes a Houlihan's restaurant. Both would be funded by OHPD and represent an approximate $60 million investment. To coordinate the design and constriction of 1 the hotel and convention center as one project, the development agreements also include the hiring of OHM as the City's design professional and construction manager agent. While the contractor for the constriction will be selected by the City once design development drawings become available, this process will allow a more seamless and efficient design and constriction process. Financing of the convention center is anticipated through the issuance of Certificates of Obligation Bonds which would be self supported from project related revenue, and includes an annual rent from OHPD to the City necessary to satisfy the City's debt obligation. The project also anticipates the creation of a Tax Increment Investment Zone (TW) to capture the growth in appraised value of the project. Both the County and DISD will be invited to participate, though there have been no formal commitments to do so. The development agreements include several feasibility periods to guide the project to the point of funding and constriction. The following is a summary of the project related decisions and steps that must occur during the feasibility periods prior to the completion of final design and initiation of constriction. • Approval of design development drawings • Approval of guaranteed max Price constriction contract • Finalize convention center development budget and determine overall project affordability • OHPD to provide hotel funding commitment • OHPD to provide hotel franchise commitment • Initiate creation of TW and determine possible participation by other governmental entities • City evaluates favorability of market conditions • City initiates the sale of bonds to fund constriction of the convention center • City issues debt 2 Over the past three months, staff has conducted a series of Work Sessions with the City Council to discuss the financial proforma and financing of the convention center, and presented and discussed the proposed development agreements. The development agreements include the following documents: • Master Development Agreement • City -UNT Land Lease • Cit -,T -OHPD Sub Lease (Convention Center Sub Lease) • OPHD -UNT Land Lease • Professional Service Agreement — Construction Management Agent • Professional Service Agreement — Design Service • Non- Disturbance and Attornment Agreement On December 5, 2013, the UNT Board of Regents met to consider the development agreements and tools action to authorize the Chancellor to sign the Master Development Agreement and the OHPD -UNT Land Lease once the documents have been finalized. At the time of writing this agenda information sheet, staff did not have the final version of the development agreements and ordinance to include in the City Council backup. While staff does not anticipate any significant changes to the documents from what has been provided to you previously in your November 19 and December 3 agenda packets, the final version of the agreements will be provided prior to the December 10 Council Meeting once they are available. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW September 2011 - Received proposal from O'Reilly Hospitality Management (OHM) January 2012 - City, OHM and UNT reach non - binding agreement on guiding principles to negotiate a development agreement (the Memorandum of Preliminary Agreement.) March 2012 - City and OHM meet with local hotel operators at the Quarterly Convention and Visitor Bureau Hospitality Meeting to present the proposed project. May 2012 - City Council Work Session to receive overview of proposed project and meet with the prospective developer, Tim O'Reilly. December 2012 - City and OHM present proposed project to the DISD Trustees during a Trustee Meeting. March 2013 - City Council Work Session discussion and update on proposed project. September 2013 - City Council Work Session discussion and update on proposed project. October 2013 - City Council Work Session discussion and update on proposed project. November 19, 2013 - City Council Work Session discussion and review of development agreements. December 2, 2013 — Presentation of proposed project to joint City Council and DISD Board Trustees meeting. December 3, 2013 — Presentation of proposed project to Economic Development Partnership Board. December 3, 2013 — City Council Work Session discussion and review of development agreements. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed Hotel and Restaurant are estimated to cost $60 Million and will be funded and owned by OHPD. The Convention Center, which will be owned by the City, is estimated to cost $25 Million and will be funded through the issuance of Certificates of Obligation Bonds. Project related revenue (Hotel Occupancy Taxes, TW revenue and sales taxes) plus rent payments by OHPD will be dedicated to meet the required annual debt obligations to fund the Convention Center. EXHIBITS (To be provided once the final version is available) PowerPoint Presentation Master Development Agreement City -UNT Land Lease City -OHPD Sublease OHPD -UNT Land Lease Professional Services Agreement — Constriction Manager Agent Professional Services Agreement — Architect or Engineering Non - Disturbance and Attornment Agreement Respectfully Submitted: Jon Fortune Assistant City Manager 4 Proposed Hotel and Convention Center City Council Meeting December 10, 2013 Agenda Purpose Project Overview 1�11111, Convention Center Financing 1�11111, Convention Center Feasibility and Timeline Development Agreements Next Steps Purpose of Convention Center Encourage the convention and tourism industry, resulting in positive economic impact to Denton retail, restaurant, and hotel businesses Expand the tax base through construction of new retail and restaurants Provide a facility in Denton to serve citizens, businesses, educational institutions, and organizations Project Overview Collaboration Between: it of Denton O'Reilly Hospitality Management (OHM) (Developer & Operator) O'Reilly Hotel Partners Denton (OHPD) (Financier) University of North Texas (UNT) 11,111, Site - 13.5 Acres Located on UNT Property Embassy Suites Hotel and Houlihan's Restaurant (OHPD Funded) 11,111, Convention Center (City Funded) Total Project Cost - $85 Million Convention Center ® $25 illi® 11 i 4 Project Overview -Hotel /Restaurant OHPD to Lease Land from UNT Funded and Owned by OHPD OHM to Manage Construction and Operations Embassy Suites with Latest Design Concepts Planned 318 Suites LEED Certified Houlihan's — 8,000 sq/ft with 290 Seats Educational Opportunity Through the UNT School of Hospitality , Operated and Managed by OHM Size is Currently Proposed at Approx. 100,000 sq. ft. Grand Ballroom � Approximate 2,000 Person Capacity for Banquet Style Events Project Overview- Site Plan z Ir a Fid,minapj Site Plan 3 Rues CorvsrMorattar $iW HUM site Unwersi� Norh Uxss Ir _31 FAut 0 MaMPT Devplopu*M hgmement winkin Cumm mkin cuaae Prtipa WW� DocsmW, 10, 2913 Convention Center Financing Goal is to be Self Supporting City to Sell Certificate of Obligations to Fund Conv. Center ., Debt Supported from Project Revenue Including OHM Rent 111111, Creation of aTax Increment Finance District (TIRZ) Helps Ensure Project is Developed Located on UNT Property that is CurrentlyTax Exempt 1111gill I'l 5 Convention Center Financing Debt Service Funded by: ov Hotel Occupancy Taxes (HOT) Related to the Development of the Project This Includes HOT Revenue from Convention Center Hotel and up to $1 OOK in Other HOT Revenue ov TIRZ Revenue (AdValoremTaxes from IncreasedValue) ov City Sales Taxes — Derived from Project v OHPD Lease Payment to City Equal to the Net Balance of Total Project Revenue and the Amount Needed to Satisfy the City's Annual Debt Payment Begins in Year Three of Operations 9 Convention Center Feasibility & Timeline Development Agreements Professional Service Construction Professional Service Design Non-Disturbance Next Steps Approval of Development Agreements Begin Initial Design Initiate Creation of theTIRZ Determine Level of Participation from Other Governmental Entities Solicit Construction Proposals Receive Franchise/Hotel Funding Commitment from OHPD 12 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: December 10, 2013 DEPARTMENT: Transportation Operations ACM: Jon Fortune 9` SUBJECT Receive a report, hold a discussion and provide direction regarding options to improve pedestrian accessibility including the restriction of vehicle access in the 100 block of Walnut Street. BACKGROUND In August 2013, a group of merchants and stakeholders approached Mobility Committee Chair Kamp to determine the feasibility of closing Walnut Street between South Locust and South Elm to vehicular traffic to create a pedestrian mall. Committee Chair Kamp met with merchants and stakeholders on September 11, 2013, to gauge the general interest in the idea of permanently closing Walnut Street to facilitate a pedestrian plaza or look into other options that may include partial closure of the street. Ms. Kamp reported that approximately 40 stakeholders attended the meeting and the group indicated interest in a proposal to enhance pedestrian amenities on Walnut Street, more specifically a permanent closure to create a pedestrian plaza. The stakeholders recognized several issues such as financing of infrastructure, loss of vehicular parking and maintaining utility /service access that will need to be addressed but were interested in evaluating options. Ms. Kamp requested staff to review options for Walnut Street to improve pedestrian amenities in the area or create a pedestrian plaza in the one -block corridor and bring the item to the Mobility Committee to determine feasibility. Ms. Kamp referenced pedestrian malls and street closures that have enjoyed success in Martha's Vineyard, Church Street in Burlington, Vermont, The 16th Street Mall in Denver and Boulder's Pearl Street Mall. Three initial options were considered by staff and brought forward for discussion at the October 15, 2013 Mobility Committee meeting for consideration. Permanent Street Closure - Conversion to a pedestrian plaza /mall with no vehicular access other than public safety vehicles. Limited Closure — Close Walnut Street to vehicular traffic during specified hours such as 6:00 pm to 1:00 am or on specific nights /weekends and festivals. The street could be reopened during normal business hours to allow access for utility service, merchant deliveries and maintain vehicle circulation around the Square during business hours. Agenda Information Sheet December 10, 2013 Page 2 of 3 Complete Street — Constrict Walnut to 20 feet wide allowing Fire Department access and expand sidewalk on one or both sides. This concept is included in the DTIP as part of the Mews Street Concept Plan and is similar to the Hickory Street "complete street' project (Exhibit 1). At the October 15 Mobility Committee Meeting, staff indicated that with any option, maintaining access for public safety vehicles will be important to any proposal and consideration should also be given to condition of existing utilities and merchant access. Staff recommended that due to the age of the existing water and wastewater utility infrastructure in the corridor, these utilities should be reconstructed prior to any improvements to Walnut Street. The Mobility Committee requested staff to establish cost estimates for utilities in the corridor and bring the item to Council for consideration. To establish the baseline utility cost, staff quoted the reconstruction and replacement of existing municipal utilities to meet the current standard (Exhibit 3). The estimate for street constriction includes the replacement of the existing roadway with a 24 -foot wide cross section. This will provide the potential of two lanes, adequate public safety access and curb and gutters. The public right of way begins at the edge of the current buildings and the street cost estimate includes 16 -foot sidewalks on each side of the proposed 24 -foot wide roadway, extending from the building to edge of curb. It is important to note that additional costs are anticipated by staff as the replacement of the current sidewalks providing access to businesses will need to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access requirements. This will include not only public funds to provide sidewalk ramps, but also the potential cost to property /business owners who may be required to revise entrances to their place of business to meet ADA. This estimate does not include provisions for ADA access ramps to public entrances on Walnut. Staff is in contact with Atmos, Charter and Verizon to establish a baseline estimate for private utilities in the corridor. The following table outlines a baseline replacement of existing municipal utilities in the corridor. Summary of Municipal Utility Expenses: Electric: $ 324,517 Water: $ 74,027 Wastewater: $ 70,173 Solid Waste: $ 41,950 Streets and Sidevmlks: $ 227,485 Street Lights: $ 25,000 Total Expense $ 763,152 Additional items discussed by the Committee, citizens and staff at the October 15 Mobility Committee meeting included the following: • Merchant deliveries (loading zones /times), • ADA Accessibility to business addresses on Walnut Street, • Loss of approximately 23 on- street parking spots ($3,000 /surface spot), • Maintenance of enhanced streetscape /pedestrian plaza area, and • ROW use permits for private and commercial use of public rights of way. Agenda Information Sheet December 10, 2013 Page 3 of 3 This agenda item is intended to provide Council an opportunity to review initial options and examine issues that may need to be addressed should one or more of the options for Walnut Street be advanced. Funding for enhancements to Walnut has not been identified and Council may wish to include the proposed project in the upcoming bond package. Staff will provide a power point presentation to facilitate the discussion that will include examples of successful pedestrian malls, current condition of Walnut Street and utility infrastructure cost estimates. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW October 15, 2011 —Mobility Committee review of options and feasibility discussion. FISCAL INFORMATION A baseline financial estimate for municipal utilities, 16 foot sidewalks and 24 -foot wide street reconstruction was established at $763,152. This estimate does not include the cost of private utilities as a preferred option has not been identified at this time. EXHIBITS 1. Downtown Denton Implementation Plan — Complete Street Exhibits (Mews Street) 2. Utility Map 3. Preliminary Walnut Closure Costs (municipal utilities) 4. Draft Minutes — Mobility Committee October 15, 2013 5. Power Point Presentation Respectfully Submitted: Marl. Nelson Transportation Director Parallel Parkinc Curb Extensio Access Doors, Mews Streets - Trash And Defivegy Prototype Exhibit 5,13 Downtown Denton Implementation Plan, September 2010 EXHIBIT I -load Solid waste Container waste Cointalner Enclosure ing and Unloading Zone Striping strian Access ri I WMI �t Landscaping EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 2 Preliminary Walnut Street Closure Costs The following is a summary of planning level estimates for each utility and the street department to replace the existing infrastructure in Walnut Street from S. Locust to S. Elm. These estimates do not include any reconfiguration of streets, sidewalks and /or pedestrian related infrastructure. Summary of Expenses: Electric: $324,517 Water: $ 74,027 Wastewater: $ 70,173 Streets: $227,485 Street Lights .$25,000 Total Expense $721,202 Notes: 1. Electric — The scope of the proposed project include primary feed replacement from the east side of the Locust Street right of way to the west side of the Elm Street right of way. The amount of construction time would be approximately two months once the work was authorized. The estimate includes a 10% contingency. 2. Water —The proposed water line replacement project is based on the replacement of the existing 6 inch water line with an 8 inch water line. The estimate also contemplates that the work would be accomplished by in -house resources. If we contract the work, then the cost for replacement would increase by approximately $20,000. 3. Wastewater —The proposed cost for the wastewater line is based on the work being accomplished by in -house resources. 4. Street — The proposed cost for the street replacement includes only the reconstruction of the streets, sidewalks and curb cuts in their current configuration. Cost estimates also include an additional $37,914 for engineering and design. 5. Street Light - Costs are based on the standard street light fixtures and will be dependent on the type of lighting that is selected for the area. 6. Estimates for private utilities such as Verizon, Charter, Atmos, etc. have not been included. I DRAFT MINUTES 2 City Council Mobility Committee 3 Tuesday, October 15, 2013 4 5 After determining that a quorum of the Mobility Committee of the Denton City Council was 6 present, the Committee convened into a meeting on Tuesday, October 15, 2013 at 1:37 p.m. in 7 the Civic Center Community Room, 321 E. McKinney Street, Denton, Texas. 8 9 Present: Mayor Pro Tem, Pete Kamp; Committee Chair 10 Council Member, Dalton Gregory 11 12 Absent: Council Member, Kevin Roden 13 14 Also Present: John Fortune, ACM; Howard Martin, ACM; Lee Howell, Police Chief, Mark 15 Nelson, Director of Transportation; Jim Coulter, Director Water Utilities; Jim 16 Mays, Superintendent of Planning and Constriction - Parks; Don McLaughlin, 17 Engineer DME; Julie Glover, Economic Development Program Admin; Mike 18 Perkins, Solid Waste Collection Manager; Ron Menguita, Development Review 19 Committee Admin; Laura Behrens, Fire Marshall; Chad Weldon, Deputy Fire 20 Marshall; and Kim Mankin, Administrative Supervisor. 21 22 Citizens: Ken Willis, Beth Maries; Bob Moses, Beth Maries; Karen and Jimmy Meredith, 23 Sweetwater; Shelly Tucker, Scott Campbell, dentoning.com; Charlie, Loop Hole. 24 25 OPEN MEETING 26 27 2) Receive a report, hold a discussion and provide direction regarding options to improve 28 pedestrian accessibility including the restriction of vehicle access in the 100 block of Walnut 29 Street. 30 31 Mark Nelson presented this item stating Chair Kamp requested staff to look at some different 32 options on Walnut Street. Chair Kamp was approached by stakeholders and merchants in the 33 area to consider options, enhancements or opportunities on Walnut Street from Locust Street to 34 Elm Street. Nelson stated there have been some internal staff discussions and we have had a 35 staff meeting with various departments to look at items that would need to be addressed and 36 implemented as part of any proposal. 37 38 Nelson stated that staff considered three options; permanent street closure (similar to a pedestrian 39 mall), limited closure (weekends, evenings or single day festivals) or complete street, (enhanced 40 pedestrian access). Nelson then showed pictures of what these options may look like from 41 different areas around the country. Nelson also explained the concept of using automated 42 bollards in the limited closure concept. 43 44 The Complete Street Concept takes into account the public transportation component, 45 automobile, bicycle and pedestrian amenities. Walnut doesn't have much in the way of public Mobility Committee Meeting Draft Minutes October 15, 2013 Page 2 of 6 1 transportation rather the street serves mostly as a service alley for the area. It does provide some 2 vehicle circulation around the Square and access for merchants on both sides of Walnut as well 3 as access for the utilities in the area. Pictures of the complete street concept were provided. 4 5 Nelson then showed a diagram from the DTIP of the Mews Streets that includes Walnut. It 6 shows wider sidewalks, raised crosswalks, medians and traffic calming devices including curb 7 extensions. The diagram also included a loading zone mid block. 8 9 There were some current pictures of Walnut Street that were taken from the east and west. The 10 pictures show the utility services including solid waste dumpsters. 11 12 Nelson stated that one of the things that have been talked about with different areas that utilize 13 street closing is reducing the crown of the street. Crowns are constricted in streets for drainage 14 purposes. Crowns are aligned along the middle of the street and are higher than the gutters to 15 force the water to drain to the curb and gutters. Staff may want to reduce the crown if this street 16 is mostly utilized for pedestrians. This would create more of a level walking surface. Nelson 17 added that the street was 45 feet wide on the east end, 39 feet wide in the middle and 39 feet 18 wide on the west end. 19 20 Nelson showed pictures of the service entrances. If there are to be any enhancements to the 21 sidewalk areas, the entrances would need to be made more ADA accessible (Americans with 22 Disabilities Act). Some of the entrances are two to four feet from street level. That would be a 23 financial concern or issue that would need to be addressed to meet the ADA regulations. 24 25 Nelson completed his presentation and asked Chair Kamp is she would like to open up the 26 meeting for discussion and to determine if there are examples that she would like to be 27 investigated in detail or if particular concerns exist. 28 29 Kamp stated that the meeting she facilitated at Sweetwater was at the desire of the tenants on 30 Walnut Street. The discussion was very positive. Kamp stated there are some concerns and 31 challenges. This is the time to talk about what can be done about solid waste and utilities. The 32 decision about closing the street completely is desired by Kamp but unsure if it is feasible. What 33 are the challenges and what would have to be done. Nelson stated they have not gone into full 34 detail on the options. Staff wanted to see the interest of the stakeholders. 35 36 In terms of closing of the street, first the City would need to maintain access for public safety. 37 There was discussion regarding the 20 feet needed for fire access. Kamp asked if that would 38 need to be paved, Chad Weldon confirmed it would. Kamp asked if there are utilities under the 39 street. Nelson answered yes; water, wastewater and electric. Kamp stated there could feasibly 40 be a 20 foot lane with pedestrian walks. Nelson stated he is sure the merchants would want to 41 maintain some type of a loading zone. By constricting the streets and widening the sidewalks Mobility Committee Meeting Draft Minutes October 15, 2013 Page 3 of 6 1 that may allow for commercial use on the sidewalks. If that is accomplished, right of way use 2 permits may have to be utilized. Kamp stated they get loading zone permits. Nelson added it 3 would be similar to the loading zone permits. 4 5 Kamp stated we are here today to discuss feasibility. Nelson stated it can be done. Primary 6 concern would be public safety. Depending on where the utilities fall within a particular option, 7 the age (of utility infrastructure) would be considered similar to what was recently completed on 8 Hickory Street, Bell toward the A -train platform. Water and Wastewater Utilities replaced the 9 older utilities in that area in anticipation of the Hickory Street Grand Project. Kamp asked how 10 many feet were replaced on Hickory Street and the cost associated. Howard Martin stated he is 11 not sure but can find out. Jim Coulter believes it was just under $500,000 to replace the 12 water /wastewater utilities. Martin added that cost can be found out for water, wastewater and 13 electric between Elm and Locust Streets (Walnut Street). 14 15 Gregory asked if the City can divert the money that was (originally) assigned to Walnut Street to 16 complete this. Julie Glover stated that there was $800,000 in CIP funds earmarked for that strip 17 on Walnut. Gregory asked if that was originally supposed to look like what was completed on 18 Cedar Street. There were plans to work on that street five years ago and it had the same issues 19 with utilities and the money was moved. Kamp clarified that the $800,000 was for Walnut 20 section. Glover added that it was Walnut from Locust to Cedar. Kamp stated there was some 21 federal money added on Cedar Street. 22 23 Gregory stated as he looked at the options that Nelson laid out on paper, would Walnut be a 24 candidate for `A Better Block Project'. This is where, on a temporary basis, lines would be 25 drawn, parking would be rearranged, dumpsters would be changed or moved and have an event 26 on a day with the new arrangement. Volunteers would add street scaping; have a nursery donate 27 trees for a day or two with plants. Would this be a possibility? It would help us determine if this 28 is something that the citizens would like permanently. Fortune stated it was about $45,000 to 29 take on an event like this in the past. Gregory added that staff could probably do this on our own 30 or significantly less without a consultant. There will be cost but not $45,000. Kamp added that 31 Brian (Locldey) went to the Ft. Worth event "Better Block "; we will get information from that 32 event. Denton certainly has the volunteers in this community for an event like this. 33 34 Kamp stated to her the Better Block program was a good program. A member of the audience 35 stated to the Mobility Committee that she didn't see the `reach for the stars' option in the 36 presentation. It is a closed pedestrian plaza; the second option was to have the bollards in place 37 to open the streets in case of an emergency or for a certain number of hours a day for deliveries 38 or other maintenance issues. You could have festivals or daily events for this type of option. 39 There was some discussion on the options. 40 Mobility Committee Meeting Draft Minutes October 15, 2013 Page 4 of 6 1 Kamp added that on street closures for events, there are coordination issues and they may be 2 daily if the road is closed most of the time. 4 Kamp asked how much the bollards cost. Nelson answered anywhere from $2,000 - $10,000 for 5 pneumatic. Nelson clarified that is without installation costs just the components. That would 6 assume there is no obstruction with the underground utilities. The City would want to look at the 7 underground utilities before any improvements are made. Jim Coulter stated the water and 8 wastewater lines are 70 -90 years old in that area and those will need to be replaced. Staff will 9 probably need more than emergency access for routine maintenance associated with the water 10 and wastewater lines. All the businesses on the sides of Walnut have water meters in that 11 roadway section. Our crews need to be able to get in unless staff changes the way they are 12 served which would be much more expensive. 13 14 Kamp asked Weldon how it is handled for public safety on the pedestrian plazas. Weldon 15 answered he is unsure of the distance or space but would need access. UNT has some areas with 16 limited access but the sidewalks are rated for emergency access. 17 18 Kamp stated what they want to look at first is not a normal public street. If there was something 19 rated for fire tricks that would provide access. Weldon added for fire service they just need 20 adequate access. 21 22 Karen Meredith stated that she had been told that if there was a fire on Walnut Street the fire 23 tricks do not go down Walnut and asked for clarification. Weldon answered if they need access 24 to the fire and the fire is in the back of one of the buildings that would be the access point. It 25 would depend on where the emergency was. Gregory asked if there was a fire in the Evers 26 Warehouse, how would you get to it if not on Walnut? Weldon stated Walnut would be the 27 primary access. Kamp went on to say accessibility is the issue. Scott Campbell asked if there is 28 a maximum distance from where the truck is to the fire. Weldon answered 150 feet to all 29 portions of the exterior of the building. Scott Campbell added maybe there could be divots at 30 each end of the street to pull in the trick and have additional area. That would also shorten the 31 distance. 32 33 Kamp asked if Karen Meredith had anything further. Meredith stated she spoke with the 34 company that services their grease trap and he says the businesses he services could be 35 accommodated from the end of the street. His company could adapt. Kamp asked about loading 36 zones. A merchant added that the "beer tricks could accommodate from that distance, they do in 37 other areas and that loading is a challenge on Walnut anyway." 38 39 Gregory added this would eliminate parking on Walnut, now many spots would that be? Nelson 40 answered there are 20 -23 parking spots in that area. There was some further discussion on the 41 parking spots. Mobility Committee Meeting Draft Minutes October 15, 2013 Page 5 of 6 1 2 Gregory added this could be a million dollar project but there is still the issue of the south side of 3 the buildings on the Square are not attractive. There would be a lot of public money invested in 4 the street. Gregory believes there would be an expectation from the property owners that 5 something would be done with the facade. Meredith added that she didn't believe the property 6 owners would be supporting this if they didn't know they would have to improve the facade. If 7 you add greenery and plaza area, it will be improved immediately but she believes the business 8 owners know they have a responsibility. Charlie owns the business Loop Hole, not the building 9 where it is located. The ADA compliance on the back of the building would be a huge financial 10 impact. This building was built in 1850 -1860; the back entrance is only for service and fire I I escape. Not sure how that could be useable to benefit the business. He does not believe the 12 landlord will add money for the benefit of this project. There are a lot of renters on the Square. 13 Charlie isn't against the project but is concerned with what they have to go through plus no 14 reason to close the street if there are no business frontages on Walnut. Moses has designs for 15 changing his buildings and it isn't that expensive for what he was going to do. It is expensive to 16 bring the entire building up to ADA compliance. Glover added that the problems that she sees 17 are that some of the doors open on the street some do not. Gregory asked if there is ADA access 18 on Hickory Street, is it required to have it on Walnut Street for those businesses. Glover 19 answered usually for historic buildings a different standard applies. You have to get a historic 20 specialist to write a letter saying this is a historic building that cannot be reconfigured in the 21 manner. Usually there are additional entrances that can provide access. There are ways around 22 it in historic buildings. She doesn't believe it will be required to have ADA on the entire 23 building, but will have to look at to see how to make it work. 24 25 Mr. Campbell could see this being something from the City and the citizens. He writes a blog 26 and has received positive response regarding a project like Better Block. There is a lot of talent 27 in this town that is willing to help and volunteer. Kamp likes this but still need to decide on what 28 to do with the street. 29 30 Kamp said today we need to see where we go from here. There is obviously a desire and 3 I support. Kamp would like to move forward. Nelson asked full closure or limited closure, what 32 concept should staff work toward? Gregory added that we need to see what full closure really 33 means from the emergency personnel and utility personnel to see if it is possible. We will need 34 more info from staff. Kamp agreed we will need more especially if we are talking about 35 relocating utilities and funding may not be available until the next bond election. Staff can work 36 on what a partial and full closure look like. In the mean time a group can be organized to have 37 an event or festival and close the street for two or three days. Get the volunteers in and see what 38 it looks like. Karen Meredith added that a street closed for a couple of days is different from a 39 street closed permanently. She believes there would be great success. This could be an idea and 40 could be an asset to the other businesses that do not touch Walnut and a benefit to the whole Mobility Committee Meeting Draft Minutes October 15, 2013 Page 6 of 6 1 downtown area and Denton as well. There are endless possibilities in that area. Kamp agrees 2 that is why the Mews Streets were in the DTIP and why there were funds to do these things. 4 Gregory stated putting out $20,000 - $30,000 for a temporary event to get a feel is a whole lot 5 cheaper than building the whole thing and deciding it wasn't a good idea. If all the property 6 owners could be invited to the event to get the feel and know what it is about, it would be very 7 helpful. What has happened in some of the other Better Blocks has generated a lot of activity. 8 Areas where buildings have been empty for years, suddenly they are revitalized and within a year 9 businesses were moving back in just because this was a good experience. 10 11 Ken Willis added that Cedar Street is good but not what was pictured in his mind. That is why 12 the merchants are more vocal this time and trying to steer the project in a certain direction. 13 Kamp thinks that is an excellent point. Kamp thanked all the departmental staff who attended. 14 Her challenge is to be creative and think about things other than what it is. The stakeholders do 15 have something to say. There were so many challenges on Cedar Street with the infrastructure 16 and things that were not anticipated. The same is to be expected with Walnut. Coulter added it 17 will be a big project. Kamp is encouraged. Martin will get costs associated with utility 18 infrastructure. Fortune asked if Kamp would like a similar presentation to the full Council. 19 Kamp agreed. Kamp asked Weldon to look at creative ideas on access. Kamp finished by 20 saying if the merchants have questions or other ideas to please let them know. 21 22 With no further business to address, the Committee adjourned at 2:47 p.m. Parallel Parking Curb Exterisio Access Doors Mews Sheets - Trash And Nfiveiy Prototype Exhibit 5.13 -Wide Sidewalks -Raised crosswalk -Medians -Traffic Calming E Front-load Solid Waste Container Solid Waste Container Enclosure Loading and Unloading Zone Striping Pedestrian Access Angled Parking Street Landscaping Ifpedau; I CaIk,d I AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: December 10, 2013 DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office ACM: Jon Fortune 9 SUBJECT Consider adoption of an ordinance approving the Denton Convention Center Project Master Development Agreement between the City of Denton, Texas (City), the University of North Texas (UNT), O'Reilly Hotel Partners Denton, LLC (OHPD), and O'Reilly Hospitality Management, LLC (OHM) and including Exhibits A through H thereof to wit: Exhibit "A" City - UNT Land Lease, Exhibit "B" City —OHPD Convention Center Sublease, Exhibit "C" OHPD- UNT Land Lease, Exhibit "D" Preliminary Site Plan, Exhibit "E" Professional Services Agreement for Constriction- Manager -Agent (CMA), Exhibit "F" Professional Services Agreement - Architect or Engineer, Exhibit "G" Contractor Payment Guidelines, Exhibit "H" Hospitality Management Guidelines; and providing and effective date. BACKGROUND The City has considered many proposals to constrict a convention center over the past few years in pursuant to the long standing objective to provide adequate convention center facilities to meet community needs and to encourage and promote economic development through convention and tourism related activity. More recently, staff received a proposal from O'Reilly Hospitality Management (OHM) that we believe has all the necessary elements for a successful project. The major development concepts of the OHM proposal were originally identified in January 2012, in a non - binding Memorandum of Preliminary Agreement (MOPA) between the City, OHM and the University of North Texas (UNT). Since then, staff has been working from the MOPA to negotiate and draft a development agreement to build a convention center and convention center hotel. Following the completion of extensive negotiations, the parties have now successfully reached consensus on the terms necessary to finalize the development agreements and realize the City's goal of building a convention center. If approved, the project would include a convention center funded and constricted by the City and an upscale hotel connected to the convention center constructed by O'Reilly Hotel Partners Denton (OHPD). Both facilities would be located on property owned by the UNT near Apogee Stadium and leased to the City and OHPD. The proposal includes plans for the City to sub -lease the convention center to OHPD which would be operated and managed by OHM (same operator as the hotel). The size of the convention center is an approximate 100,000 sq /ft facility and includes an approximate 30,000 1 sq /ft ballroom. It will be designed to handle very large events and be able to accommodate approximately 2,000 for banquet style seating. The City would fund and own the convention center which is estimated to cost $25 million. It is important to note that the City would be funding the convention center only and not the hotel. The hotel is planned to be an Embassy Suites of approximately 318 rooms (twelve stories tall), but at a minimum will have 275 rooms (nine stories tall) and includes a Houlihan's restaurant. Both would be funded by OHPD and represent an approximate $60 million investment. To coordinate the design and constriction of the hotel and convention center as one project, the development agreements also include the hiring of OHM as the City's design professional and construction manager agent. While the contractor for the constriction will be selected by the City once design development drawings become available, this process will allow a more seamless and efficient design and constriction process. Financing of the convention center is anticipated through the issuance of Certificates of Obligation Bonds which would be self supported from project related revenue, and includes an annual rent from OHPD to the City necessary to satisfy the City's debt obligation. The project also anticipates the creation of a Tax Increment Investment Zone (TW) to capture the growth in appraised value of the project. Both the County and DISD will be invited to participate, though there have been no formal commitments to do so. The development agreements include several feasibility periods to guide the project to the point of funding and constriction. The following is a summary of the project related decisions and steps that must occur during the feasibility periods prior to the completion of final design and initiation of constriction. • Approval of design development drawings • Approval of guaranteed max Price constriction contract • Finalize convention center development budget and determine overall project affordability • OHPD to provide hotel funding commitment • OHPD to provide hotel franchise commitment • Initiate creation of TW and determine possible participation by other governmental entities • City evaluates favorability of market conditions • City initiates the sale of bonds to fund constriction of the convention center • City issues debt 2 Over the past three months, staff has conducted a series of Work Sessions with the City Council to discuss the financial proforma and financing of the convention center, and presented and discussed the proposed development agreements. The development agreements include the following documents: • Master Development Agreement • City -UNT Land Lease • Cit -,T -OHPD Sub Lease (Convention Center Sub Lease) • OPHD -UNT Land Lease • Professional Service Agreement — Construction Management Agent • Professional Service Agreement — Design Service • Non- Disturbance and Attornment Agreement On December 5, 2013, the UNT Board of Regents met to consider the development agreements and tools action to authorize the Chancellor to sign the Master Development Agreement and the OHPD -UNT Land Lease once the documents have been finalized. At the time of writing this agenda information sheet, staff did not have the final version of the development agreements and ordinance to include in the City Council backup. While staff does not anticipate any significant changes to the documents from what has been provided to you previously in your November 19 and December 3 agenda packets, the final version of the agreements will be provided prior to the December 10 Council Meeting once they are available. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW September 2011 - Received proposal from O'Reilly Hospitality Management (OHM) January 2012 - City, OHM and UNT reach non - binding agreement on guiding principles to negotiate a development agreement (the Memorandum of Preliminary Agreement.) March 2012 - City and OHM meet with local hotel operators at the Quarterly Convention and Visitor Bureau Hospitality Meeting to present the proposed project. May 2012 - City Council Work Session to receive overview of proposed project and meet with the prospective developer, Tim O'Reilly. December 2012 - City and OHM present proposed project to the DISD Trustees during a Trustee Meeting. March 2013 - City Council Work Session discussion and update on proposed project. September 2013 - City Council Work Session discussion and update on proposed project. October 2013 - City Council Work Session discussion and update on proposed project. November 19, 2013 - City Council Work Session discussion and review of development agreements. December 2, 2013 — Presentation of proposed project to joint City Council and DISD Board Trustees meeting. December 3, 2013 — Presentation of proposed project to Economic Development Partnership Board. December 3, 2013 — City Council Work Session discussion and review of development agreements. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed Hotel and Restaurant are estimated to cost $60 Million and will be funded and owned by OHPD. The Convention Center, which will be owned by the City, is estimated to cost $25 Million and will be funded through the issuance of Certificates of Obligation Bonds. Project related revenue (Hotel Occupancy Taxes, TW revenue and sales taxes) plus rent payments by OHPD will be dedicated to meet the required annual debt obligations to fund the Convention Center. EXHIBITS (To be provided once the final version is available) PowerPoint Presentation Ordinance Master Development Agreement City -UNT Land Lease City -OHPD Sublease OHPD -UNT Land Lease Professional Services Agreement — Constriction Manager Agent Professional Services Agreement — Architect or Engineering Non - Disturbance and Attornment Agreement Respectfully Submitted: Jon Fortune Assistant City Manager 4 Proposed Hotel and Convention Center City Council Meeting December 10, 2013 Agenda Purpose Project Overview 1�11111, Convention Center Financing 1�11111, Convention Center Feasibility and Timeline Development Agreements Next Steps Purpose of Convention Center Encourage the convention and tourism industry, resulting in positive economic impact to Denton retail, restaurant, and hotel businesses Expand the tax base through construction of new retail and restaurants Provide a facility in Denton to serve citizens, businesses, educational institutions, and organizations Project Overview Collaboration Between: it of Denton O'Reilly Hospitality Management (OHM) (Developer & Operator) O'Reilly Hotel Partners Denton (OHPD) (Financier) University of North Texas (UNT) 11,111, Site - 13.5 Acres Located on UNT Property Embassy Suites Hotel and Houlihan's Restaurant (OHPD Funded) 11,111, Convention Center (City Funded) Total Project Cost - $85 Million Convention Center ® $25 illi® 11 i 4 Project Overview -Hotel /Restaurant OHPD to Lease Land from UNT Funded and Owned by OHPD OHM to Manage Construction and Operations Embassy Suites with Latest Design Concepts Planned 318 Suites LEED Certified Houlihan's — 8,000 sq/ft with 290 Seats Educational Opportunity Through the UNT School of Hospitality , Operated and Managed by OHM Size is Currently Proposed at Approx. 100,000 sq. ft. Grand Ballroom � Approximate 2,000 Person Capacity for Banquet Style Events Project Overview- Site Plan z Ir a Fid,minapj Site Plan 3 Rues CorvsrMorattar $iW HUM site Unwersi� Norh Uxss Ir _31 FAut 0 MaMPT Devplopu*M hgmement winkin Cumm mkin cuaae Prtipa WW� DocsmW, 10, 2913 Convention Center Financing Goal is to be Self Supporting City to Sell Certificate of Obligations to Fund Conv. Center ., Debt Supported from Project Revenue Including OHM Rent 111111, Creation of aTax Increment Finance District (TIRZ) Helps Ensure Project is Developed Located on UNT Property that is CurrentlyTax Exempt 1111gill I'l 5 Convention Center Financing Debt Service Funded by: ov Hotel Occupancy Taxes (HOT) Related to the Development of the Project This Includes HOT Revenue from Convention Center Hotel and up to $1 OOK in Other HOT Revenue ov TIRZ Revenue (AdValoremTaxes from IncreasedValue) ov City Sales Taxes — Derived from Project v OHPD Lease Payment to City Equal to the Net Balance of Total Project Revenue and the Amount Needed to Satisfy the City's Annual Debt Payment Begins in Year Three of Operations 9 Convention Center Feasibility & Timeline Development Agreements Professional Service Construction Professional Service Design Non-Disturbance Next Steps Approval of Development Agreements Begin Initial Design Initiate Creation of theTIRZ Determine Level of Participation from Other Governmental Entities Solicit Construction Proposals Receive Franchise/Hotel Funding Commitment from OHPD 12 S p e c a C, lllltl,d2 AGENDA INFORMATION SHEET AGENDA DATE: December 10, 2013 DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office ACM: Bryan Langley SUBJECT Consider appointments to the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee, BACKGROUND Mayor Pro Tem Kamp and Council Members Engelbrecht, King and Roden have one appointment available for the Citizens Bond Advisory Committee. Attached is the current list of appointed members and a list of applications that have been submitted. If you require any further information, please let me know, Respectfully submitted: Jennifer Walters City Secretary 2014 CITIZENS BOND ADVISORY COMMITTEE Co-Chairpersons Appointed by City Council Address; Name: Address: Phone: Email: Tim Crouch 3800 Lariat Rd 940-565-9370 tier!( nn nou�..= Randy Robinson 2913 Destin Dr 940-387-3550 rrub nson---1,-f —bmllitx —(.o n, Appointed by Council Member Engelbrecht Name: Address; Phone: Email: Karen DeVinney 1820 West Oak St 940-380-0348 mornste (qlyen on.ne t Alex Lieban 2208 Parkside Dr 940-597-8720 ali..ba r yE.,.jzon,not e ..bans ................................. Royce Freebourn 1805 Wickwood Ct, 76226 740-591-9021 3a e,t nn2k C mtedy, Claralynn Barnes 2416 Royal Acres Dr 940-566-0034 122r.:022c`z.( v. eri.z.211.nnnnent' Ira Weinstein 10305 Murray S Johnson, 76207 940-262-0151 _dedwardsrwVvvuedu Amanda Austin 1307 N Locust 940-369-0133 —bre.n d a ra LL rrcrlV rvtL223.crz Appointed by Council Member Gregory Name: Address: Phone: Email: Sharon Barnhill 3329 Hummingbird Ln 940-390-6303 mornste (qlyen on.ne t Janet Shelton 4 Timbergreen Circle 940-300-4119 n!j. DaleTampke 2400 Southridge Dr 740-591-9021 3a e,t nn2k C mtedy, Linnie McAdams 1426 Kenolph Dr 940-206-4412 1 m rn J ryn -Lnnnnnnn'nnnnnnn�--n��nnnnn�inn—nr —an I �rl Ct Don Edwards 2308 Crestwood PI 940-312-3975 _dedwardsrwVvvuedu Robert Bostic 1307 N Locust 940-369-0133 —bre.n d a ra LL rrcrlV rvtL223.crz Sarah Hoffman 3412 Oriole Ln 940-368-6240 sarahKwynne (g n.a %l .c m Appointed by Council Member Hawkins Name: Address: Phone. Email: Joe Alford 1608 Lynhurst Ln 940-231-9787 baHord3@vedzcri,net Scott Campbell 2420 Oakridge St 940-535-8057 Glen Farris 108 W. Oak St, Ste D 940-300-6743 fdrrNffa�gMa4 90M Larry Parker 2801 Spencer rd #15101 817-915-0568 1 UMLP —ctvntaja �=M—tr—orn Roni Beasley 3808 Montecito Dr 940-387-7062 rbeas0 e 1511, (Jp3rter'ne5 Brenclon Carroll 2223 Houston PI 940-230-2447 —bre.n d a ra LL rrcrlV rvtL223.crz Dan Proctor 3109 Anysa Ln 940-453-2331 d n0dentoni -thR L raov.corn 2014 CITIZENS BOND ADVISORY COMMITTEE Name Address: Phone: Email: Hank Dickenson 1301 S Bonnie Brae, 76207 940-565-3339 hankjr ickenson@Dunt Fdu Mary Ann McDuff 2233 Hollyhill Ln 940-435-2300 rn MC Of verizonjiet ......... ............ Alyssa Stevenson 311 E Hickory St #132 409-363-3603 ay -1 Stephen Coffey 1104 Southmont Dr, 76205 940-300-7868 scoff�—D V- re =f'qLn Emily White 2319 Fowler Drive, 76209 940-765-9282 ewhiteL,�nc I (,c o � n Ron Johnson 6025 Sun Ray Dr 214-455-7410 .. . .. ..... ..... . 1 tl Name: Address: Phone: Email: Reggie Hill 3206 Belmont St 940-565-9274 hi Ite n s ol.coirn i 11 2A Greg Johnson 1696 S. Loop 298 940-594-7717 gighns Gustav Seligmann 6 Oak Forrest Circle 940-395 0294 Carol Phillips 2013 Tremont Circle 940-391-9608 yi. on net j_ ..Mf ............................. Jean Greenlaw 2600 Sheraton rd 940-383-4786 il'reeldawl( ve ri �� et m 12— Nand Kimmey 300 Matthew Avenue, 76209 940-231-6577 .. . .. ..... ..... . 1 tl Appointed by Council Member Roden Name: Address: Phone: Email: ColetteJohnson PO Box 2816 940-595-5088 ggletteirrodentoncad corn Keith Shelton 621 Grove St 940-387-4715 Kimberly Villarreal Th agga rd 1913 Briarwyck Ct 76205 Anyah Martinez 708 Smokerise Circle 940-595-4001 a.E!y.a!!r.nE4nd -za ahOCCOM ................ Allison Wing 1529 Angelina Bend Dr 817-229-5491 al liso n I viol, ton Wi ny'@.grna i Lcol n Russ Stukel 1005 Ridgecrest Circle 940-368-5512 stukelLDzit&dLt Appointed by Mayor Burroughs Name: Address: Phone: Email: Cleve Breedlove 320 Eagle Drive #100, 76201 940-982-3962 abi Fedlove L@al stcb curn Jim Clark 1220 Tula ne Dr, 76201 817-909-0566 kc5b.hIL, Jack Thomson 1401 Amherst Dr 940-382-5176 Gerard Hudspeth 606 Wilson St 214-543-9091 .�Jpg'!.!oirmconl Brandon McCluskey Michelle Bradley 316 Wainwright Apt 303 Judy Willis APPLICATIONS FOR 2014 CITIZENS BOND COMMITTEE Name: Address: Phone: Email address: District: Sharon Barnhill 3329 Hummingbird Ln 940 - 390 -6303 momster9 @verizon.net 2 Rosanne Ciccia 3620 Big Horn Trail 214- 766 -1662 rciccia @live.com 4 Tim Crouch 3800 Lariat Rd 940 -565 -9370 tim@thecrouchgroup.com 3 Karen DeVinney 1820 West Oak St 940- 380 -0348 drkjdev @aol.com 3 Jean Greenlaw 2600 Sheraton Rd 940- 383 -4786 j.greenlawl @verizon.net 2 Jamie Harrington 2408 Kariba Ln 817- 797 -0008 jamie@totallythebomb.com 4 Alex Lieban 2208 Parkside Dr 940 -597 -8720 alieban @verizon.net 3 Anyah Martinez 708 Smokerise Circle 940 -595 -4001 anyahmartinez @yahoo.com 4 Mary Ann McDuff 2233 Hollyhill Ln 940- 435 -2300 mamcduff74 @verizon.net 4 Carol Phillips 2013 Tremont Circle 940- 391 -9608 carol.phillipsl6 @ verizon.net 4 Batavia Russel 2302 Jacqueline Dr 214- 289 -5369 bataviarussell @gmail.com 4 Gustav Seligmann 6 Oak Forrest Circle 940 -395 -0294 gus @unt.edu 4 Janet Shelton 4Timbergreen Circle 940 - 300 -4119 jwshelton @verizon.net 4 Keith Shelton 621 Grove St 940- 387 -4715 shelton @unt.edu 1 Daniel Speelman 3410 Lipizzan Dr 214 - 557 -3900 dlspeelman @verizon.net 4 Dale Tampke 2400 Southridge Dr 740- 591 -9021 dale.tampke @unt.edu 4 Allison Wing 1529 Angelina Bend Dr 817- 229 -5491 allisonmortonwing @gmail.com 1 Applications Received After November 5th: Name: Address: Phone: Email address: District: Claralynn Barnes 2416 Royal Acres Dr 940 -566 -0034 barnesc5 @verizon.net 2 Michelle Bradley 316 Wainwright St Apt #303 940 - 231 -4538 michelle.g.bradley @ gmail.com 1 Vicki Byrd 2S12TimberTrail 940- 453 -4603 vltbyrd @verizon.net 1 Brendan Carroll 2223 Houston PI 940- 230 -2447 brendan.carroll @2223.org 3 Jim Clark 1220 Tulane Dr 817- 909 -0566 KC5BHV @yahoo.com 3 Victoria DeCuir 1008 Hillcrest St 940 -594 -7935 victoriadecuir @gmail.com 3 Don Edwards 2308 Crestwood PI 940- 312 -3975 dedwards @twu.edu 2 Sarah Hoffman 3412 Oriole Ln 940- 368 -6240 sarahgwynne @gmail.com 2 Brian Holt 1512 Manten Blvd 214- 417 -5680 bholt68 @gmail.com 2 Don King 1404 Vista Verde Ct 940 - 383 -3207 donandjoycemarie @ verizon.net 4 Julie Leal 3513 Chapel Hill Ln 940- 783 -1183 juliealeal @gmail.com 2 Linnie McAdams 1426 Kendolph Dr 940- 206 -4412 I.m.mcadams @att.net 4 Lilyan Prado- Carrillo 6504 Corral Ln 940- 594 -4509 lilyan.prado @gmail.com 4 Dan Proctor 3109 Anysa Ln 940 -453 -2331 dan @denton- therapy.com 1 Russ Stukel 1005 Ridgecrest Circle 940- 368 -5512 stukel @unt.edu 4 Applications Received After November 15th: Name: Address: Phone: Email address: District: Jim Clark 1220 Tulane Dr, 76201 817 - 909 -0566 kc5bhj @yahoo.com 3 Michelle Bradley 316 Wainwright Apt 303 (940) 231 -4538 michelle.g.bradley @gmail.com