HomeMy WebLinkAbout20-1105RESOLUTION NO. 20-1105
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON ADOPTING AN INTEGRATED PEST
MANAGEMENT PLAN AS POLICY FOR CITY-OWNED PROPERTY; AND DECLARING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Integrated Pest Management is a decision-making process to establish pest
level and tolerance thresholds and combines biological, cultural, physical, and chemical tools to
minimize health, environmental, and financial risks in the management and maintenance of
landscapes; and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires to adopt an Integrated Pest Management Plan
(“IPM”) for City-owned property; and
WHEREAS, the IPM will establish the framework for operating practices and procedures
to execute the Integrated Pest Management methodology and achieve the stated goals; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the public’s best interest to adopt the IPM; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES:
SECTION 1. The City of Denton Integrated Pest Management Plan, which is attached
hereto as Exhibit 1, and made a part hereof, is hereby adopted as an official policy of the City of
Denton.
SECTION 2. The attached plan shall be filed with the City Secretary.
SECTION 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and
approval.
lprove this Resolution was made by bA
Th Resolution was passed andbAd:/VI
The motion to
and seconded by
approved by the folloy#ng vote lb
Aye
1/
i
Z
b,/
./
Nay Abstain Absent
Chris Watts, Mayor:
Gerard Hudspeth, District 1 :
Keely G. Briggs, District 2 :
Jesse L. Davis, District 3 :
John Ryan, District 4:
Deb Armintor, At Large Place 5 :
Paul Meltzer, At Large Place 6:
PASSED AND APPROVED this the / (z#Kday 2020of
CHRIS WATTS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
ROSA RIOS, CITY SECRETARY
'IPAayii\bb
+ aITI s&te14t
EXHIBIT
ntegrated Pest Management Plan
It is important for the City of Denton to be environmentally conscious in providing safe and well-
maintained facilities and landscapes for all visitors. The Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plan
provides a holistic approach to achieving the stated goals considering health, environmental, and
financial risks. The intent of the IPM plan is to be a living document with continued evaluation and
updates to meet current and future needs.
A special thank you to City of Denton staff in the Parks and Recreation Department (PARD), Park
Maintenance Division, Environmental Services, and the Citizen Focus Group who committed their time
and talent to the development of this document.
IPM Focus Group
Nathan Hansard University of North Texas / Field Specialist
Cynthia Maguire Texas Womens University / Native Plant Society of Texas
Bob Harris Denton County Master Gardeners
Adelaide Bodnar Master Naturalist
Bill Hartley Denton County Beekeepers Association
Cindy Hiegel Master Gardener
Carol Soph
Ed Soph
Denton Resident
Denton Resident
Gene Kastens Denton Youth Sports Association
Heather Massengale Denton Youth Sports Association
UNITE. GROW
DENTON Denton Parks and Rec
11 Page
Integrated Pest Management Plan
Table of Contents
GENERAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................. 3
Mission Statement ................................................................................................................................... 3
Goals ......................................................................................................................................................... 3
Asset Management ..................................................................................................................................4
Evaluation and Reporting......................................................................................................................... 4
Integrated Pest Management .................................................................................................................. 4
Pesticide Use ............................................................................................................................................ 6
Safety ........................................................................................................................................................ 8
Laws and Regulations............................................................................................................................... 8
INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT MrrHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 10
Approved Pest Management Strategies................................................................................................ 10
Criteria for Choosing a Pest Management Method .............................................................................. 12
21 Page
Integrated Pest Management Plan
GENERAL INFORMATION
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Plan is a decision-making process to determine pest levels and
tolerance thresholds and combines biological, cultural, physical, and chemical tools to minimize health,
environmental, and financial risks. This plan uses extensive knowledge about pests, such as infestation
thresholds, life histories, environmental requirements, and natural enemies to complement and
facilitate biological and other natural control of pests. It coordinates the use of pest biology,
environmental information, and available technology to prevent unacceptable levels of pest damage by
the most economical means, while posing the least possible risk to people, property, resources, and the
environment.
Mission Statement
The mission of the City of Denton’s Integrated Pest Management Plan is to manage pests that are
harmful to the health, function or aesthetic value of City landscapes and public health in a manner that
is efficient, effective, environmentally-responsible, and with careful attention to the safety of the public
and department employees.
To accomplish this, the principles of Integrated Pest Management are endorsed. This approach uses
multi-faceted strategies that minimizes economic, health, and environmental risks.
Goals
The goal and intent of this plan is to produce an evolving and living document that provides a method
and approach to guide the maintenance of public property and land. The focus and goals are:
•Strive to better connect communities to nature and enhance sustainability through conservation
practices. Areas of focus include promoting sustainable practices and strategies that address the
effects of climate change, preserving wildlife, growing a next generation of environmental
stewards, and supporting programs and policies that encourage a commitment to conservation.
Minimize the use of EPA level pesticides by applying in a targeted manner and only if deemed
necessary when pests cannot be managed by other methods.
Create and maintain a safe environment for visitors and staff that protects and preserves
natural resources, park facilities, and amenities through design, operations, and education.
Ensure stewardship of the public’s resources through fiscal accountability, responsible planning,
and effective management.
Educate and promote natural areas and cultural practices through programing such as organic
community gardening, community tree plantings, and litter abatement.
Create an active learning environment using design such as interpretative signage with a focus
on natural and historical education.
Provide a natural, healthy, educational, and social environment and ensure all people have
access and are meaningfully involved in the development and use of park and recreation
programs and spaces.
Facilitate a sustainable IPM plan and program that endures leadership and staff transitions
through thorough documentation of the policy, plan, actions, and results.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
31 Page
Integrated Pest Management Plan
Asset Management
The City of Denton (COD) is a municipal government and is the steward of over 3,000 acres of land
containing public buildings, operational facilities, electrical substations, parks, waterways, drainage,
easements, and right-of-ways. Park properties make up approximately 2,000 acres of the municipal
property. Park Maintenance is charged with taking the lead in operating and maintaining the diverse
selection of property and landscapes in a safe, attractive, healthy, and useful condition.
City owned properties represent a major component of the city’s capital assets and the City recognizes
its responsibility to protect and preserve this public and economic investment to the best of its abilities.
The City also recognizes its responsibilities to its employees and the general public and seeks to employ
the highest professional standards in the performance of its duties. To manage pests on City owned
land, COD personnel shall utilize the principles of Integrated Pest Management.
Evaluation and Reporting
The IPM plan is meant to be a living document that evolves with organizational, environmental, and
technological changes. The plan will be evaluated in full every 3 years by a group of stakeholders
identified by the Director of PARD or designee. Stakeholders would include but are not limited to
representatives from gardening groups, local educators, governmental agencies, partner organizations,
field experts, and engaged citizens at a minimum of 8 serving members.
It is PARD’s goal to meet with the stakeholder group on an annual basis to keep the group updated on
PM activities and receive feedback on recommended and proposed changes. Legal, regulatory,
procedural, and administrative changes can be made in the interim review period. All changes must be
documented on Appendix 10: Revisions of the plan.
PARD will assess the effectiveness of the plan and the progress of stated goals by developing relevant,
meaningful, and measurable performance indicators. Goals and measures will include pesticide risk
reduction and reducing pesticide use through the tracking of chemical and non-chemical interventions.
The indicators will be drafted on an annual basis during the budget process and reported quarterly.
Integrated Pest Management
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is one of the major strategies used by PARD in the maintenance of
public lands. There are many definitions of IPM, the following is from the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency for its publication, “EPA Integrated Pest Management for Turfgrass and Ornamentalsl:"
“IPM is the coordinated use of pest and environmental information with available pest
control methods to prevent unacceptable levels of pest damage by the most economical
means with the least possible hazard to people, property, and the environment. The
goal of IPM is to manage pests and the environment so as to balance costs, benefits,
public health, and environmental quality. IPM systems use all available technical
information on the pest and its interactions with the environment. Because IPM
programs apply a holistic approach to pest management decision-making, they take
1 EPA Integrated Pest Management for Turfgrass and Ornamentals. Page 315 and
http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/9101AIKB.PDF?Dockey=9101AI KB.PDF
41 Page
Integrated Pest Management Plan
advantage of all appropriate pest management options, including, but not limited to
pesticides. Thus, IPM is:
•
•
•
•
•
•
A system using multiple methods;
A decision-making process;
A risk reduction system;
Information intensive;
Cost-effective; and
Site specific."
IPM makes use of cultural practices, environmental factors, pest growth patterns and life cycles,
ecological interaction, human contact, mechanical removal and, finally, pesticides to control harmful
organIsms.
The COD defines Integrated Pest Management as the coordinated use of pest and environmental
information along with available pest control methods, including biological, cultural, physical, and
chemical methods, to prevent unacceptable levels of pest damage by the most economical means and
with the least possible hazard to people, property, and the environment.
•
•
Integrated means that all feasible types of control strategies are considered and combined as
appropriate to solve a pest problem.
Pests are unwanted organisms that are a nuisance to man or domestic animals, and can cause
injury to humans, animals, plants, and property, and have a significant economic impact. Pests
reduce yield and/or quality in vegetation ranging from flower beds, to lawns, trees, and sports
fields
Management is the process of making decisions in a systematic way to keep pests from reaching
intolerable levels. Small populations of pests can often be tolerated; total eradication is often
not necessary, or feasible.
•
Based on the above, the IPM plan consists of the following steps:
1.
2.
Identification of the issue. Identification of the pest, level of infestation, and an evaluation of
the site will determine what action is needed, if any.
Consultation. This involves defining the roles of the people involved in the pest management
equation (i.e. Certified Pesticide Applicator, Park Manager, Urban Forester, Park Supervisor,
Superintendent, and Department Director) to assure understanding and communication
between them.
Management objectives. Staff must determine the management objectives for a given site in
order to solve the pest problem(s). This can be done by establishing maintenance classifications
and standards with an outlined schedule to meet maintenance needs. Project and property
priorities relevant at the time must also be considered. A Strategy review includes determining if
a species is native or exotic, locating the management zone, and evaluating the chances of
successful management.
Set the action thresholds. These are points when pest populations or environmental conditions
indicate that action must be taken in order to prevent the pest population from crossing a pre-
determined injury threshold; no action is taken until the threshold is reached unless it is
3.
4
51 Page
ntegrated Pest Management Plan
determined that conditions pose a threat to health and safety or the infestation is detrimental
to plant material / vegetation.
Non-chemical control. In this step, action is taken to modify the pest habitat to reduce the
carrying capacity of the site, exclude the pest, or otherwise make the site’s environment
incompatible with the needs of the pest. This step, which involves applied ecology with support
from cultural and biological methods.
Pesticide action. If no-pesticide actions are not available or insufficient, the appropriate
pesticide action is taken. All efforts should made to (a) use the least toxic, most effective, most
efficient application technique that provides the longest dwell time in contact with the pest, (b)
apply when the pest is in its most vulnerable stage, and (c) carry the least possible hazard to
people, property, and the environment.
Evaluate. This means checking the post-treatment results of the habitat modification or
pesticide treatment actions by periodically monitoring the site and pest populations.
Records. For each site, records should be kept of pest management objectives, monitoring
methods and data collected, actions taken, results obtained, and pesticides used. Records of
actions taken will be documented in the appropriate record management system.
5.
6.
7.
8.
IPM is a decision-making process to determine if, where, when, and how pest control practices should
be applied. And, in the short term, modification of direct pest control practices (such as reducing
pesticide use through spot spraying strategies and replacing undesirable chemicals with more
environmentally friendly materials) can provide valuable benefits in reducing the use of pesticides.
The IPM process first determines if a pest needs to be managed, and if so, how best to do it. Key
elements are information gathering, well-informed decision making and monitoring of results. The IPM
process promotes effective, low-risk management strategies to manage pests. The controls used in this
plan include biological, cultural, physical, and chemical methods and materials; often a combination of
methods is used. Methods selected to manage specific pest populations are evaluated by licensed and
trained professionals. The methods employed conform to recognized standards established and
endorsed by state and federal regulatory agencies, state educational institutions and organizations.
Key elements of an IPM program are information gathering and informed decision-making.
Horticulturists, botanical specialists, park technicians, foresters, and arborists are skilled in identifying
and evaluating pest problems. When pest problems occur that are unusual or beyond the scope of in-
house experts, advice is obtained from other qualified sources such as state universities, Texas
Department of Agriculture, and Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service experts. Texas Pesticide
Applicators License continuing education courses reinforce employee skills and provide current
information concerning laws, safety, pests, and current IPM methods.
COD employees monitor levels of pests to arrive at the best solution for managing a pest problem.
When pest management methods are implemented by trained IPM personnel, the results are solutions
that are economically and environmentally responsible. This provides the public with safe, healthy, and
aesthetically pleasing park areas.
Pesticide Use
Pesticide is a general term for any substance intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating
any pest. Park pests consist primarily of unwanted vegetation and invasive weeds, but can also include
insects, disease organisms, rodents, and other organisms. To manage these pests, COD personnel select
61 Page
Integrated Pest Management Plan
the best methods available. When it is necessary to use pesticides as part of an IPM approach, risk is
minimized by careful product selection and application. When developing and updating the IPM
program, the best expert scientific opinion is relied upon on to inform staff about potential materials
and methods. Assessments from regulatory agencies, state university departments in Texas, scientists
and other experts in the field provide much useful specific information. The City turns to these
recognized experts for credible science-based information. Staff also stays current with the latest
pertinent studies as part of our process. By basing decisions on these authoritative sources best
solutions can be obtained within the IPM framework.
Pesticide applicators are required to comply with all pesticide label directions, federal, state, and local
pesticide regulations, applicable safety laws, and City policies. Misuse of pesticides will not be tolerated.
Pesticides not labeled or listed (refer to Appendices 1-4) will not be covered in detail within this
document, but pesticide applicators are required to use additional precaution and label directions, if
present, for all applications.
In executing the IPM methodology, pesticides are to be utilized in a prioritized approach on City
properties as follows:
Parks and Playgrounds
1. Organic pesticides and / or Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI) listed substances; and
2. EPA Level III “caution" labeled pesticides only when deemed necessary to protect public health
and economic impact.
Facilities / Buildings Landscaping
1. Organic pesticides and / or Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI) listed substances;
2. EPA Level III “caution" labeled pesticides only when deemed necessary to protect public health
and economic impact when other methods do not adequately control the pest;
3. EPA Level II “warning" label pesticides, only if deemed necessary to protect public health an
economic loss when other methods do not adequately control the pest;
4. EPA Level 1 “danger" label pesticides, only if deemed necessary to protect public health an
economic loss when other methods do not adequately control the pest.
Rights of Way (Street medians / parkways)
1. Organic pesticides and / or Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI) listed substances;
2. EPA Level III “caution" labeled pesticides only when deemed necessary to protect public health
and economic impact when other methods do not adequately control the pest;
3. EPA Level II “warning" label pesticides, only if deemed necessary to protect public health an
economic loss when other methods do not adequately control the pest;
4. EPA Level 1 “danger" label pesticides, only if deemed necessary to protect public health an
economic loss when other methods do not adequately control the pest.
Other City Property
1. Organic pesticides and / or Organic Materials Review Institute (OMRI) listed substances;
2. EPA Level III “caution" labeled pesticides only when deemed necessary to protect public health
and economic impact when other methods do not adequately control the pest;
3. EPA Level II “warning" label pesticides, only if deemed necessary to protect public health an
economic loss when other methods do not adequately control the pest;
71 Page
integrated Pest Management Plan
4. EPA Level 1 “danger" label pesticides, only if deemed necessary to protect public health an
economic loss when other methods do not adequately control the pest.
Safety
When pesticides are being applied in on City property by City personnel, notification signs are posted at
points of entry to the treated areas. When pest management equipment is being used and materials are
being applied by COD employees, all appropriate worker personal protective equipment is provided for
use. Use of such equipment is an important part of safely applying pesticides as well as using mechanical
equipment. COD employees work with the Watershed Protection Division to protect the city’s water
supply from all types of contamination. When pesticides are contemplated to be used near waterways
and drainage areas, the Watershed Protection Division will be notified. When necessary, application of
pesticides downstream of stream banks or within waterways would be done using aquatic-labeled
pesticides, following the IPM process and label directions, and with the approval of the field supervisor.
Laws and Regulations
Several Federal and State agencies regulate the use of pesticides. The City conforms to all pesticide laws
and regulations and allows only Texas State Licensed Pesticide Applicators to apply pesticides of any
kind on city property. In this way COD exceeds the standards established within Texas state law. To
obtain a Noncommercial Pesticide Applicator's License, applicators must pass a series of tests given by
the Texas Department of Agriculture. The Texas Department of Agriculture does allow non-licensed staff
to apply pesticides when it is incidental to their primary duties.
Once licensed, applicators must renew their license, annually for noncommercial applicators, and take
the required amount of continuing education units needed for the type of Pesticide Applicator’s License
held. Applicators are required by law to record specific information when applying pesticides and keep
records for a minimum of 2 years. The Texas Department of Agriculture’s designated forms are utilized
for these purposes.
Decontamination Sites
Employers must provide sites so that workers and handlers can wash pesticides and residues from their
hands and body. Decontamination supplies must include:
• Enough water for routine and emergency whole-body washing and for eye flushing;
• Soap;
• Single-use towels
Decontamination materials are also available in each applicator’s vehicle. It is the responsibility of the
applicator to ensure adequate supplies are maintained in the vehicle.
The decontamination materials may not be located in an area under restricted entry unless they serve
handlers working in that area. In this case, all materials must be protected from contamination.
Emergency Assistance
If there is reason to believe that a handler or worker may have been poisoned or injured by pesticides,
an employer must promptly make transportation to an appropriate medical facility available to that
person. Be prepared to provide the victim and medical personnel with:
• The product name, EPA registration number, and active ingredient(s);
81 Page
ntegrated Pest Management Plan
• AII first aid and medical information from the label;
• A description of how the pesticide was used; and
• Information about the victim’s exposure.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Employers must provide handlers with the PPE as listed on the pesticide label. The employer must:
• Maintain PPE in a clean and operational condition;
• Make sure it fits correctly;
• Make sure handler wears and uses the PPE correctly;
• Provide a clean place to put on and remove PPE, and store personal clothing;
• Not allow worker to wear or take-home PPE;
• Take action to prevent heat-related illness while PPE is worn.
Cleaning and Maintaining PPE
Employers must make sure:
PPE is cleaned according to manufacturer’s instructions, inspected, and repaired before each•
use;
PPE that is non-reusable or cannot be cleaned, must be disposed of properly;
Clothing drenched with pesticide labeled DANGER or WARNING are discarded;
PPE must be washed and dried properly, and stored separately from personal clothing;
Respirator filters, cartridges and canisters are replaced as often as required. The handler
employer must make sure anyone cleaning PPE is informed of possible pesticide residues on
PPE, of the potentially harmful effects of pesticides, and of the correct ways to handle and clean
PPE
Equipment Safety
Handler employers must make sure that equipment used for mixing, loading, transferring, or applying
pesticides is inspected and repaired or replaced as needed. Only appropriately trained and equipped
handlers may repair, clean, or adjust pesticide handling equipment that contains pesticides or pesticide
residues.
Environmental Protection
The City of Denton operates under the Pesticides General Permit (PGP, TXG870000) administered by the
TCEQ. The purpose of this permit is to regulate the discharge of pesticides to the waters of the United
States. Within the City, reporting for PGP compliance is coordinated through the Watershed Protection
Division. Any potential adverse incidents involving pesticides should be immediately reported to
Watershed Protection and/or PARD. Pesticide use within the City is also tracked to maintain compliance
with the PGP.
91 Page
Integrated Pest Management Plan
INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY
Approved Pest Management Strategies
Examples of possible and available management strategies among the many methods are listed in the
prevention of pest problems.
• Strategy and planning;
• Cultural practices, avoidance measures, and physical means to manage pest problems; and
• Mechanical practices, trapping, biological controls, and use of natural and synthetic pesticides.
All the IPM measures are evaluated and considered together to select the best overall solution to a pest
problem.
Strategy
Management of pests through adoption of Strategy can be highly effective and low in cost. Such policies
can often eliminate problems before they begin. Some examples are:
Prioritization of parks for control measures may be considered. Different park areas may have
varying standards of acceptable care and appearance. Determining whether a particular park
area requires control of pests and the level of that control must take these differences into
account. Careful attention to public desires and public needs must be part of this prioritization
process
Establishment of thresholds for action and the tolerance level for different pests are part of the
IPM process. These thresholds vary according to plant, pest, site, and park classification.
Determinations of action thresholds are made on a case-by-case basis.
•
•
Design
Proper park design is a major way that pest problems can be avoided. While no landscape can be
designed to be free of pest management needs, such considerations need to be part of the planning
process. Examples are:
• Elimination or modification of problematical areas;
• Avoiding the use of potentially invasive species;
• Proper and adequate spacing of plant material to reduce the incidence of pest problems;
• Maintenance of species diversity and elimination of monocultures in plantings where possible;
• Elimination of alternate hosts for diseases; and
• Establishment of overstory, thick groundcovers and other design techniques benefiting both the
establishment of plants and the reduction of weed problems.
Plant selection
Plant selection is critical in minimizing pest management needs both short- and long-term. Criteria for
plant selection include:
• Right plant, right place.
• Use of disease or pest resistant or tolerant plant species or varieties; and
• Removal of invasive or pest-susceptible plants and replacement with varieties of native or
adapted pest resistant plants.
• Consideration will be given to native plants under favorable conditions and design goals.
101 Page
Integrated Pest Management Plan
Cultural practices
Proper cultural practices are essential in establishing healthy landscapes and can often help to maintain
their resistance to pest problems. Examples are:
• Knowledge of the cultural requirements of plants to best provide proper conditions for optimum
plant health and resistance to pests.
Soil testing and amendment as indicated by test results to promote plant health and
prevent/avoid pest issues that can result from or be exacerbated by nutritional imbalance.
•
• Adequate site preparation before landscape installation. This can include soil improvements,
pruning of surrounding vegetation, grade adjustments, drainage improvements, and installation
of irrigation systems.
• Use of disease resistant grafting rootstock or scion wood.
• Proper timing and use of water to reduce over or under watering.
• Proper timing and use of fertilization to eliminate over and under-fertilization.
• Use of cover crops to improve soil structure and reduce soil erosion.
• Rotation of plant species in nursery areas to reduce the buildup of pests.
• Aeration, over-seeding, and top-dressing to improve turf health and suppress weeds.
• Raking and debris removal to remove pest sources.
• Pruning and plant removal to promote air circulation and light penetration for plant health.
• Removal of diseased, infested, damaged, or dead wood
• Mulching for weed reduction, water retention, winter protection and root zone improvement.
• Fan placement for improved greenhouse air circulation.
Mechanical and physical controls
Mechanical and physical methods are often employed to manage pests. Examples are:
• Mechanical edging of turf.
• Mechanical clearing of weeds in rough areas.
• Hand weeding in shrub beds.
• Weed wrenching or loping, or chain sawing invasive trees.
• Mowing of rough turf areas for vegetation control.
• Traps such as yellow sticky boards for greenhouse insects and traps for mammalian pests.
• String trimming to control unwanted vegetation.
• Disinfecting materials or equipment to prevent spread of pests.
Biological controls
Where applicable, biological control is useful to manage pests. This is the use of living organisms to
reduce pest populations. These organisms are often also referred to as beneficials, natural enemies or
biocontrols. They act to keep pest populations low enough to prevent significant environmental and
economic damage. Examples are:
• Introducing insect or disease parasitoids, predators, and microbial products to control pests.
• Minimizing the use of disruptive techniques and materials in landscapes that may destroy
natural pest control organisms.
111 Page
Integrated Pest Managernent Plan
Naturally derived and synthetically derived pesticides
Pesticides are derived from many sources. They vary widely in their characteristics and must be
examined individually to determine their suitability within the IPM approach. Examples are:
• Placement of pheromone traps.
• Disinfecting materials or equipment to prevent spread of pests.
• Application of naturally and synthetically derived pesticides.
Criteria for Choosing a Pest Management Method
When choosing a pest management method or pesticide material from the approved lists located in
Appendix 1-4, all personnel should consider the following factors and any additional factors relevant to
the selection.
Nature of the site
• Erosion susceptibility and potential movement of soil through runoff;
• The intended use and function of the landscape;
• The feasibility of the method given the area and scope of the problem;
• The relative importance and public expectation of a site or plantings; and
• Site conditions such as soil type, grade, drainage patterns, and presence of surface water.
Possible health and safety effects
• Consider both short- and long-term toxicological properties and any other related potential
health effects of the materials or methods, both to the applicator and the public;
• Equipment operation safety issues for both the operator and the public; and
• Worker safety and worker injury issues involved with carrying out the method.
Possible environmental effects
Consider both acute and chronic toxicity and any other related potential effects of the material
or method to non-target organisms including mammals, birds, amphibians, fish, invertebrates
and other organisms;
Environmental effects from potential bioaccumulation;
Potential impacts to non-target plants and other organisms from materials or methods;
•
•
•
• Potential impacts to federally listed, threatened or endangered species; and
• Possible introduction or establishment of invasive plants.
Costs
•
•
•
•
•
Costs of the material or method;
AppIIcation and labor costs;
Length and quality of pest control;
Feasibility of using a particular method or product; and
Indirect cost from aforementioned health, safety, and environmental effects.
121 Page
Integrated Pest Management Plan
Characteristics of the product
• Target pests and target sites of the product being used;
• Possible residual effect, decomposition pathways, rates, and breakdown products;
• Volatility and flammability;
• Product formulation and package size;
• Leachability, solubility, and surface and soil bonding characteristics of the product;
• Ease of cleaning equipment after use; and
• Positive and negative synergistic effects of pesticide combinations.
Special considerations
• Application equipment availability;
• Method of delivery;
• Current and anticipated weather conditions;
• Previous pesticide applications to the site and the interval between treatments; and
• Possible development of pest resistance to a particular management method or material.
131 Page