Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout24-112524–1 125ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OFTHE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2016-189AND UPDATING THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, ROADWAY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN,AND THE IMPOSITION OFUPDATED ROADWAY IMPACT FEESFORDESIGNATEDSERVICEAREAS; ADOPTING ROADWAY IMPACT FEES PER SERVICE UNIT; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE ASSESSMENT,COLLECTION, COMPUTATION, EXPENDITURE, REFUND AND GENERAI,ADMINISTRATIONOF ROADWAY IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCOUNTS FOR ROADWAY IMPACT FEES; PROVIDINGCONSTRUCTION,SEVERABILITY, AND CONFLICT CLAUSES;PROVIDING FORTHE AMENDMENTTHE CHAPTER25 OF THE CODEOF ORDINANCESBY CREATING AND CODIFIYING ARTICLE VI, ENTITLED “ROADWAY IMPACT FEES”; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION OF SECTIONS25-252THROUGH 25-275 IN THE CODEOFORDINANCES;AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City hasadopteda roadway impact fee by Ordinance No. 2016-189, and in accordancewith Chapter395 of the Local Government Code(“Statute”), the impact fee and the associatedLand UseAssumptionsandCapital ImprovementsPlanshall be updatedat leastevery five years. WHEREAS, the City retainedKimley-Horn and Associates (“Kimley-Horn”) to prepare 1) a “RoadwayImpact FeeStudy” that containsupdatedLand Use Assumptions(“LUA”) reflecting adescriptionof five Serviceareasandprojectionsof 10-yeargrowth in residentialand nonresidential land uses in each service area, 2) an updated Roadway Impact Fee Capital ImprovementPlan(“CIP”) to identifycapitalimprovementsor roadwayfacility expansionsfor which roadway impactfees may be assessed,and 3) an updatedcalculation of the roadway impact fee (“Roadway ImpactFees”).The RoadwayImpact FeeStudy is attachedasExhibit A hereto and incorporated by referenceherein; and WHEREAS, theCity hasmadeof copy of the proposedLUA, thetime of theprojections, andadescriptionof thecapital improvementfacilities availableto thepubic by keepingacopy of the LUA andCIP in theCity Secretary’soffice and posting acopy on the City Website on May 16,2024 in compliance with Section395.043, Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Capital ImprovementAdvisory Committeeof the City of Denton (“CIAC”), createdpursuantto Section395.058,TexasLocal GovernmentCode,filed its written commentson the proposedRoadway Impact Feeson or about May 20, 2024; and WHEREAS, on June6, 2024,City Council approved Resolution 24-173 establishing and providing notice of apublic hearingasrequired by Chapter395 of the TexasLocal Government Code;and WHEREAS, onJuly 16,2024, City Council held apublic hearingon the LUA and CIP relatingtotheadoptionof updatedRoadwayImpactFeeswhere thepublic hadtheright to appear at the hearingandpresentevidencefor or againstthe LUA andCIP for the proposedRoadway ImpactFees;and WHEREAS, the City Council desiresto adopt, updateand amendthe LUA and CIP for Roadway Impact Fees;and afterpublic hearing on this matter, the City Council finds that adoption of the updatedLUA andCIP arein thebest interestof the citizensof theCity of Denton; and WHEREAS,the City Councildesiresto adopttheRoadwayImpactFeesand related administrativeprocessashereindescribedandfinds that it is in the bestinterestof the citizens of theCity of Denton;NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OFDENTONHEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The recitals and findings set forth above are true and correct and areincorporated into the bodyof this Ordinanceasif fully setforth herein. SECTION 2. The City herebyadoptsandapproves the Kimley-Horn Roadway Impact Fee Study inclusive of Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Capital Improvements Plan attached hereto as Exhibits A. SECTION3. Chapter395,TexasLocalGovernmentCode,supplementsthis Ordinanceto the extentthat its provision may be applicablethere to and, to such extent, its provisions are incorporatedherein.Thetermsandprovisions of this Ordinance shall not beconstruedin a manner to conflict with Chapter395, asamended,andif any term or provisions of this Ordinance shall appearto conflict with any term, provision or condition of Chapter395 suchOrdinanceterm or provisions shall beread,interpreted,andconstrued in a mannerconsistent with and not in conflictwithChapter395. SECTION 4.The City hereby adoptsthe updated Maximum AssessableRoadway Impact Fee and the updatedRoadway Impact FeeCollection Rateattachedand incorporated hereto asExhibit B, Schedule 1, and Exhibit B, Schedule 2 respectively. SECTION 5. The City herebyadoptsthe updated Land Use Equivalency Table attachedand incorporatedasExhibit C. SECTION 6. If any provisionof this Ordinanceor theapplication of anyprovision to anyperson orcircumstanceisheldinvalid,theinvalidity shallnot affectotherprovisionsor applicationsof the Ordinancewhich canbe given effectwithout the invalid provision or application, andto this end the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable. SECTION 7.This Ordinanceshall becumulative of all provisions of ordinancesandof the Code of Ordinancesfor the City of Denton, Texas, as amendedexcept where provisions of this Ordinancearein direct conflict with the provisions of suchordinancesof such Code,in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances and Code are hereby repealed. SECTION 8. Chapter25 of theDenton Code of Ordinance of City of Denton, Texas,entitled “Streets,Sidewalks,andPublic Places”is herebyamendedto addArticle VI entitled “Roadway ImpactFees”which contentsshallreadasfollows : CHAPTER 25: STREETS,SIDEWALKS, AND PUBLIC PLACES ARTICLE VI. ROADWAY IMPACT FEES Section25-252.ShortTitle. This article shallbeknown andcitedasthe "Denton RoadwayImpactFeeRegulations". Sec.25-253. Findings Incorporated. Thefindingssetforthaboveareincorporatedinto thebodyof this article asif fully setforth herein andareherebyfound to betrue andcorrect factual and legislative determinationsof the City ofDenton,Texas. Sec. 25-254. Purpose. This article is intendedto assurethe provision of adequateroadway facilities to serveNew Development in the City by requiring each development to pay a shareof the costs of such Capital Improvementsor Roadway Facility expansionsnecessitatedby and attributable to such New Development. 25-255. Authority. This article is adoptedpursuantto TexasLocal GovernmentCode(TLGC) Chapter395 and the Denton City Charter.Chapter395supplementsthis Article to the extent that its provisions may be applicableheretoand, to such extent,its provisions are incorporatedherein by reference. The provisions of this article shall not be construedto limit the power of the City to utilize other methodsauthorizedunderstatelaw or pursuantto otherCity powersto accomplishthe purposes set forth herein,eitherin substitutionor in conjunctionwith this article. Guidelinesmay be developedby ordinance,resolution,or otherwiseto implement andadministerthis article. Sec.25-256.Applicability. The provisions of this article apply to all new, non-exemptdevelopmentwithin the corporate boundariesof the City located within a Roadway ServiceArea. Sec. 25-257. Incorporation of Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan. The RoadwayImpact Fee Capital Improvements Plan and Land Use Assumptions identifying CapitalImprovementsor Facility Expansionspursuantto which RoadwayImpact Feesmay be assessed,asconsidered and adopted by the City Council Ordinance No. 2016- 085 and asamended by City Council Ordinance2024-1125. Sec.25-258. Definitions. In this article: (a) Assessmentmeansthedeterminationof theamountof the Maximum AssessableRoadway Impact FeeperService Unit which canbe imposed on New Development pursuant to this Article (b)Capital Improvementmeansa RoadwayFacility with a life expectancyof three or more years,to be ownedand operatedby or on behalf of the City. (c) City meanstheCity of Denton,Texas. (d)Credit meansareductionin theamountof aRoadwayImpactFee(s),payments,or charges forapprovedconstructionor provision of thesametype of Capital Improvementfor which afee hasbeenassessedfor aNew Development. This is done by either by a proven decrease in thenumberof ServiceUnitsattributableto suchdevelopmentor adecreasein theamount of Roadway Impact Fees otherwise due, that results from contributions of land, improvementsor fundsto construct systemimprovementsin accordancewith the City’s subdivisionanddevelopmentregulations,policies or requirements,asdeterminedby the City (e) Final plat approval meansauthorizationbythe City PlanningandZoning Commissionthat the final map of a proposedsubdivision meetsall City standardsand conditions in accordancewith theCity’ssubdivision regulationsandtheExecutiveChairmanof the City PlanningandZoning Commission executesthe applicant'splat andthat the plat may be recordedin theoffice of thecounty clerkof Denton.Thetermappliesbothto original plats andreplats. (f) ImpactFee,or "RoadwayImpactFee", meansa fee,charge,or Assessmentfor Roadway Facilities imposedon New Development by the City pursuantto this Article in order to generaterevenueto fund or recoupall or part of the costsof CapitalImprovementsor facility expansionnecessitatedby andattributableto suchNewDevelopment.Theterm includes amortized charges, lump-sum charges, capital recovery fees, contributions in aid of constructionandany otherfeethat functions as describedby this article or the TLGC Chapter395.Theterm isinclusiveof boththe Maximum AssessableRoadwayImpactFee and the Roadway Impact FeeCollection Rate as herein described. (g) Land Use Assumptionsmeansthe description of Service Areas and the projections of population and employmentgrowth and associatedchangesin land uses,densities and intensitiesadoptedby the City, as may be amendedfrom time to time, upon which the RoadwayImpactFeeCapitalImprovementsPlanisbased. (h) Land Use Equivalency Table means a table converting the demands for Capital Improvementsgeneratedby various landusesto numbersof ServiceUnits, asmay be amendedfrom time to time.(SeeLand UseEquivalencyTable below.) ExhibitC- land UseEquivalencyTable ITEland IUse Code LandUse Category ITripGenlPass-Rate1 by(PM) I Rate Development Units ;:Tf:.I;:::Trip I Adj. IAdj.TripIMaxTriplVeh-MI Lengthl ForO. I length I Length 1Per Dev (mi)ID 1 (mi)1 (mi)I Unit PORTAND TERMINAL Intermodal TruckTerminal \„„I I110E130Ia15SO% F[•1-4.90U4.90 4.90H4.904.90thorne 4.904.9019:79150%14.90 4.90SO%4.90I-T E Posi [II1.33 13.96I [ClEHE]School FnleFr–r––1630T–TIn-I610•l•620 l 50% @ Br–r–[–IIT 50%2.22942mR2.22 msRFT=allsa,6941sm947sax848 l@3/ +5I 5CE85.64 50% 50%AI'-";C SOX5.60 B 5.60 SW6a3 48% 53% 34% F 6036%A[30%BB MsBI’-'"sa/a 16.161==1u3?31Ba BIn/npR INDUSrRiAL General LightIndustrial Industrial Park Warehousin1 Mini-Warehouse RESIDENTIAL Single-Family Detached Housin1 MultIfamily Housing(Low-Rise: Multlfamlly Housing(Wise} Multifamijy Housing(High-Rise] ResIdentIal CondoSMBw SenIor Adult HousinRSingle-FaI SeniorAdult m ing-Multifami =3 O1.87ToTo aT/ ml al BE 1.moSFGFA 1,000SFGFA 1,000 SFGFA 1,000 SFGFA 0.65 0.34 0.18 0.15 o.65 1 10.021 50% o.34 1 10.021 sa6 0 0 5.01 5.01 5.01 HIlIEI 5.01 5.01 5.01 HIlIEI 210 220 221 222 230 251 252 254 Dwellin Dwellin Dwelli n Dwellin Dwglml Dm/lmrIM\!mI Beds Unit Unit UnitUnit Unit Unit Unit 0.94 0.51 0.39 0.32 0.36 0.30 0.25 0.24 0.94 0.51 0.39 0.32 0.36 0.30 0.25 IFIPPII s0% 1 4.90 5% 1 4.m 4.90 4.90 LODGINGMI Motel Assisted Living Room Room 0.59 0.36 1.25 0.28 2.50 0.59 I I o.36 1 6.43 1 50% 1 3.21 3.21 3.21 3.21 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 RECREATIONAL GolfDraM Golf Course Recreational Communi' IceSkating Rink Miniature GolfCourse Multiplex Movie Theater ml N;nnis Club INSTITUTIONAL 432 430 495 465 431 445 09 Tees 1.25 0.28 2.50 1.33 0.33 13.96 3.82 7.86 7.86 7.86 7.86 7.86 15.77 7.86 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 n4 1.10 9.83 5.23 Center Acre 1,000 SFGFA 1,000 SFGFA Holes SO% SO% 50% SO% SO% Movie Screens e Church Day CareCenter Elementary School mach(;nt / Junior Hi1 High School Junior / Community Colle University / College 560 565 520 522 530 540 550 1,000 SFGFAMFA Students Studentsmme Mme==nts 0.49 11.12 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.11 0.15 44% B 0.49 6.23 0.16 0.150.14 0.11 0.15 8.31 3.49 3.49 3.49 3.49 10.44 10.44 50% sa6 4.15 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.74 5.22 5.22 4.15 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.74 5.22 5.22 2.03 10.84 0.28 0.26 0.240.57 0.78 MEDICAL Clinic Hospital Nursing Homemms=)-m 1.000SFGFA 1 3.69 0.86 0.14 2.47 4.92 4.92 4.92 4.92 4.92 4.92 linensbr 0.14Fm 1.30 OFFICE Corporate Headquarters Buildini General Office guildin Medical-Dental OffIce Bui SingjeTenant@gce Buildi Office Park COMMERCIAL Automobile Related AutomobIleCareCenter AutomobilePartsSales ==/ ServiceStatIon Gasoline / ServiceStation w/ Conv MarketRMme a-iick LubricationVehicle Sho Self-Service CarWash Tire Store Dinin,ml=ml ; Fast Food Restaurantwithout Drive-Thru Window HEmover (Sit-Down) Restaurant Quality Restaurant Coffee / Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window R5Ttme FiBjtail Free-Standing Discount Store Nursery (GardenCenter: Home Improvement Superstore Pharrnac'// Drugstorew/o Drive-Thru Window PharmmMw/ Drive-Thru Window Shopping Center(>lSOk]Shoppr bk aFRetail Plaza(<40k Superml A ToWmEJEe n'sSuperstore m) lent Store 640 30%B 714 710 720 715 750 .000 SFGFA 1.000 SFGFA n6•©B©KGh,A El188B©®® 1,mo SFGFA 1.30 1.44 3.93 1.76 1.30 14.65 14.65 9.85 14.65 14.65 7.32 7.32 4.92 7.32 7.32 1.000 SFGFA 1er e 1,mo SFGFA Servicing Positions Ma M1 ns 1,000 SFGFA 3.11 4.90 13.91 18.42 2.42 1.87 2.79 8.07 8.10 1.94 2.91 3.32 2.70 4.45 4.45 1.20 1.20 5.60 4.45 1.20 4.45 944 945 841 0.60 2.80 2.22 0.60 2.22 0.601 4.86 934 933 932 931 937 1,000 SFGFA 1,000 SFGFA 1,mo SFGFA 1,000 SFGFA 1,000 SFGFA –T:3m 33.21 9.05 7.80 38.99 16.52 16.61 5.16 4.37 11.7 2.82 2.82 2.82 2.82 2.82 2.82 2.82 2.82 2.82 2.82 46.59 46.84 14.55 12.32 32.99 815 817 862 880 881 820 821 822 850 864 U7 1,000 SFGFA 11,dM FA 1,(XX)SFGFA 1.mI SFGFA 1,000 SFGFA 1,000 SFGFA 1,000 SFGFA1,oM?FA 1,000 SFGFA 1,000 SFGFA 4.83 6.94 2.33 8.51 10.29 3.40 5.19 6.59 9.24 5.00 1.95 3.38 4.86 1.21 4.00 5.25 2.24 3.43 4.35 2.80 2.80 2.80Tm T=8(R 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 M4 IIBlgIl 3.39 11.20 14.70 6.27 9.60 12.18 16.55 9.80 3.84 A AA A A A 5.60 5.60 5.60 5.60 5.60 5.60 50% SO% 50% Wo 50% SO% 2.80 2,80 2.80 2.80 34% SERVICES < Drive-In Bank a Key to Sources of Pass.by Rates A: ITETrip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (September 2017) B:EstimatedbyKimley-Hornbasedon ITEratesfor similarcategories C:ITErate adjusted upward by KHAbased onlogical relationship to other categories Drive-in Lanes 1,000 SFGFA 1,000SFGFA 12.13 27.07 1.45 7 1 O 2.22 2.22 3.20 (i) MaxImum AssessableRoadwayImpact Fee means the Impact Fee that is established for each ServiceArea computedby calculatingthe total projectedcosts of Capital Improvementsnecessitatedby and attributable to New Development and subtracting a portion of ad valoremtax revenuesto be generatedby new Service Units, including the payment of debt, associatedwith the roadway CIP, and then dividing that amount by the total number of ServiceUnits anticipated within the Service Area basedupon the land use assumptions. The Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee shall be established and reflectedin Schedule1below.The City may adopta RoadwayImpact FeeCollection Rate that is less than this amount,but in no instanceshall the Roadway Impact Feeexceed the Maximum AssessableRoadwayImpact Feeexceptby amendmentof this article. SeeSection25-260 a) New Development means a project involving the construction, reconstruction, redevelopment,conversion,structural alteration, relocation, or enlargementof any structure,or any use or extensionof land, which has the effect of increasingthe requirementsfor Capital Improvements or facility expansions,measuredby the number of ServiceUnits to begeneratedby suchactivity. (k) Recoupmentmeansthe impositionof an Impact Feeto reimbursethe City for Capital Improvements which the City haspreviously oversizedto serveNew Development. (1) RoadwayImpact FeeCollection Rate meansthe currentamount of RoadwayImpact Fee adoptedby DentonCity Councilto bepaid bythe propertyowner,asmayfrom time to time beamended,which isthe resultof a percentagereduction of the adoptedMaximum AssessableRoadway Impact Fee.The adoptedRoadway Impact FeeCollection Rate shall be establishedandreflectedin Schedule2. The adoptedRoadwayImpact FeeCollection Ratemay befurther reducedwith Credits,designedto fairly reflect thevalueof Roadway Facilities providedby adeveloperin accordancewith the City's developmentregulations or requirements.SeeSection25-260.. (m)Roadwaymeansany primary and secondaryarterial or collector designatedin the City's adoptedMobility Plan,asmay beamendedfrom time to time. Roadwayalsoincludes any thoroughfare designatedasa numbered highway on the official federal or Texas highway system;to theextentthattheCity incurs CapitalImprovementcostsfor suchfacility. (n) RoadwayFacility meansan improvementor appurtenanceto a Roadwaywhich includes, but is not limited to, rights-of-way, whether conveyedby deedor easement;intersection improvements; traffic signals; turn lanes;drainage facilities associatedwith the Roadway Facility; street lighting or curbs, and water and wastewater improvements affected by the RoadwayFacility. RoadwayFacility alsoincludesany improvementor appurtenanceto an intersectionwith aRoadwayofficially enumeratedin the federalor Texashighway system, andto any improvementsor appurtenancesto suchfederal or Texashighway,to the extent that the City has incurred capital costs for suchfacilities, including without limitation local matchingfundsandcostsrelatedto utility line relocation andthe establishmentof curbs, gutters,sidewalks, drainage appurtenancesand rights-of-way. Roadway Facility excludes those improvements or appurtenances to any Roadway which is a Site- related Facility. (o) RoadwayFacility Expansionmeansthe expansionof the capacityof anexisting roadway in the City, but doesnot includethe repair, maintenance,modernization,or expansionof anexisting roadway to better serveexisting development. (p)RoadwayImpactFeeCapital ImprovementsPlan, or "Capital ImprovementsPlan" (CIP) meansthe adoptedplan includedin this article,asmaybe amendedfrom time to time, which identifiesthe roadwayfacilities or RoadwayFacility expansionsandtheir costsfor eachroadway ServiceArea, which arenecessitatedby andwhich areattributable to New Development, for aperiod not to exceed 10 years,which areto be financed in whole or in partthrough the imposition of Roadway Impact Feespursuantto this article. (q) ServIceArea meansa Roadway Service Area within the City’s corporate boundary, within which Impact Feesfor RoadwayCapital Improvementsor RoadwayFacility expansions may be collected for New Development occurring within suchareaand within which fees socollected will be expendedfor those types of improvements or expansionsidentified in theRoadway Impact FeeCapital Improvements Planapplicable to the Service Area. (r) ServiceUnit meansa vehiclemile. A vehicle-mile shall bedefinedasone (1) vehicle traveling adistanceof one(1) mile during theafternoonpeakhour ascalculatedherein. (s)Site RelatedFacility meansan improvement or facility which is for the primary use or benefit of oneor moreNew Developments and/or which is for the primary purpose of safe andadequateprovision of RoadwayFacilities to servethe New Development,including accessto the development,which is not included in the RoadwayCapital Improvements Plan,and for which the developer (s) or property owner(s) is solely responsible under subdivision or otherapplicabledevelopment regulations. Site- relatedFacility may include aRoadwayimprovementwhich is locatedoffsite,or within or on theperimeterof the developmentsite. (t) SystemFacility meansa roadwayimprovement or facility expansionwhich is designated in the RoadwayImpact FeeCapital Improvements Plan andwhich is not a Site-related Facility. SystemFacility may includea roadwayimprovementwhich is locatedoffsite, or within or on the perimeterof the development site. Sec.25-259. Roadway Service Areas. The City hereby establishesfive (5) Roadway Service Areas, constituting land within the City’s corporate boundaries, asdepicted in Tables 2 (A-E). The boundaries of the Roadway Service Areas may beamendedfrom time to time, or new RoadwayServiceAreas may bedelineated,pursuant to theproceduresof thisArticle. Table 2.A. IO-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan- ServiceArea A Proj.# 1IFClass Roadway Limits Length [mi) lo/oin ;ervice +[ [:: IFI I = E FlI A-2 1 SA 1 A-3 Ad A-5AdrF7–T–A-8 A-9A-10 A-11A-12 A-13,C-10 A-14,C-11 A-15,C-12 A-16,C-13 A- 17 A- 18 A-19 A-20 A-21a2 A-23 A-24 A-25 A-26 A-27 A-28 A-29 A-30 A-31 A-32m3 M SA PA PA PA PA PA PATp PATc 0 CORBINFM 1515 FM 1515 FM 1515 FM 1515 FM 1515 FM 1515 H LIVELY H LIVELY iH-35-coRBn{ I JIM CHRISTAL JIM CHRISTAL C JIM CHRISTAL E ROBSONRANCH ROBSONRANCH SPRINGSIDE SPRINGSIDE TJ EGAN-LOOP288 C WOLFE C WOLFE CORBIN C PRECISION THOMASJEGAN THOMASJEGAN UNDERWOOD WESTCOURT WESTERN S IH-35W'TO CORBIN 500’ SOF SPRINGSIDE TO CORBIN IH 35W TO CORBIN CORBIN TO WESTERN WESTERNTO WESTCOURT WESTCOURT TO MASCH BRANCH -T W OF TOM COLE 3435'W OF TOM COLE TO 530'E OF C WOLFE C WOLFE TO 2145'W OF H LIVELYMeIS IH-35 TO CORBIN IH 35 TO OLD SH 24 OLD SH24 TO WESTERN WESTERNTO MASCH BRANCH F THOMAS JEGAN TO 515'E OFC WOLFE PRECISIONTO WESTERN IH35WTOEDROBSON ED ROBSONTO YARBROUGH0 UNDERWOOD TO WESTCOURTmmiTm4mTTo3FITf––T 1140' SOFTOM COLE TO FM 2449 FM2449TOH LIVELY TI:TCORBIN TO SPRINGSIDE FM2449TOH LIVELY JIM CHRISTALTO 1635'N OFFM 1515 JIM CHRISTAL TO 2915'SOFJIM CRISTAL 1830'N OF FM 1515TO FM 1515 SPRrNGSiDETO UNDERWOODCONNECTORm-Ti5muNGSIDE JIM CHRISTAL TO AIRPORT 5 L E -F-[ aI 4 + 058 0.27 1.13 0.22 0.29 0.12 0.65 0.71 0.4 1 0.74 0.84 0.59 0.55 0.66 1.13 0.75 0.65 1.65 B3 0.35 0.16 0.46n3 0.63 0.39 0.63 0.45 0.55 0.35 0.76 0.79 1.23m7 .rea 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Wo 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100%m PA PA SA SArc PA PA CTs SA PA SA (1/2) PA (13)FA Note, The10-Year RoadwayImpactFeeCIPisnot in a prioritized order. ei7 PA PA PA PA SA PA PA (1/3 PA (1/3)iii:IPA (1/3ml 0 R 1O 020 m PIMLICO TO RIVERCHASE bLUFFF BELMONT TO COUNTRY CLUB O N I LLEYTO MONTECITO I no0.81 0.30 50% BRUSHCREEK BRUSH BRUSHCREEK L CORBN CREEKDALE CREEKDALE EL PASEO FM1515 HICKORY C HICKORY CREEK HICKORY CREEK HICKORY CREEK T 100% Io:151l00%1 rmcI) rAE A –[––[T +aI I +== = B- 16 B- 17 B-18 B- 19B-20 B-21 B-22 B-23 B-24B-2? B-26 B-27 B-28 B-29 B-30 B-31 B-32 B-33 B-34 B-35 B-36 B-37 B-38 B-39 BdO Bd1B42 B43 PA SA SA HICKORY CREEK0 HOBSONLANE S PARVNROBINSON 1 2 RYAN RYAN RYAN G GvivrAGE \\’ILLO\\’WOOD0 BONNIEBRAE BONNIEBRAE COUNTRYCLUB COUNTRYCLUB COUNTRYCLUB FORTWORTH FORTWORTH FORTWORTH FORTWORTH JOHN PAINE JOHN PAINE PARViN-ROSEL,-\\\-N TEASLEY TEASLEY TEASLEY S --[ –––+–––––-T––-––––[––-––––[–––-–-r-= –iHI 1435'W OF BIDDY BYE TO 815'E OF COUNTRY CLUB0 C K 230' E OFWHEELER RIDGETO TEASLEY 1 0.52 1 L C FORRESTRIDGETO COUNTRY CLUB O0 NAPAVn-EETmmnn5nITit-Bm IH 35ETO FM 1515 5 F 0 S0L VINTAGE TO BONNIE BRAE-iRtJTFTeREE-k S JOHNSONTO ATHENS VINTAGE TO I045'SOFVINTAGE PARVIN TO ROSELAWN IH 35ETO LONDONDERRY LONDONDERRY TO HOBSON LILLIAN B MILLER TO PENNSYLVANIA S : [==t-[I I-[ 0.38m3 0,28 100% 100% 100% 100% 100c%m 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1009’i 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1009'i 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%m 0.52 0.76 0.63 0.66m 0. 14 0.65 0.24 0.14 1.09 0.48 0.08 1.00 0.66 1.32 1.07 0.24ITl 0.42 0.20 0.52 0.25 0.97 0.36m2 SA SA/3) /3) /3)l-T SA SA SA TsI–TFT– PA PA PA CompletedSA C PA( 1/3) PA ( 1/3) PA(1/3) WA Note: The10-Year RoadwayImpactFeeCIPisnot in a prioritized order. Table 2.C. IO-Year Roadway Impact FeeCapital Improvements Plan- ServiceArea C IFClass allTT\SAB=1 SA PA PA PAmAn A- 14,C-1 SA lgth :mi) 0.98 2.75 0,87 0.41 273 2.40 0.55 0.31 0.550.66 1,13 0.75 039 0.59 0.65 0 0.47mI 0.22 0 0.75 0.33 0.87 0.25 0- BOBCAT FbI 1173 FM 11 FM 216+IH 35 I a0 42 35 A mT 6 SA C C SA EA(T/5 (1/2) JIM CHRISTAL JIM CHRISTALC C-15m C-17 mcC-19 m 8 To NIASCH BR'\:„~:C-A US77 US77 ms US77 FT mo mt IIi;iii;m Rrc= FX1216+ rEYTO WINDSO E'TO N[ASCH BRANCH-NAIL N S0 F IH 35 bSA PA bSAB C-30a3 C-32ncm C-3Sm C-37 C-38m MASCH BUNCH-NAILMASCH BUNCH-NAIL NIASCH BUNCH-NAIL WESTGATE S \\-IN DSOR S wnvDSOR WINDSORT BOT\NIE BRAE0 BONNIE BRAE BONNIE BRAE O BONNIEBRAEBONNIEBRAE BOb,NIE BRAE BONNIEBMEBONNIEBRAE BONNIEBRAE O FALL\ IEA DO\V FM 21640 LOCUST0 LOCITST LO\'ERS LOVERSrHO L LOVERS LN CONNECTORmBRANCH \IASCH BRANCH [ 8 MILAM-US 77 MILAM-US 77 MILAM-US 77NICOSIA THOMAS J EGAN S i E O S S U E O I 0 00 S E S S 0 C AlO S0 I O C L0 0 5 0 0 5 O ali(TT7ni&TeTRlgTmI IA LONG TO US 77 0 J 1c 1 SA (1/2)SA (1/2) SA (1/2) 0.58 ICD% 100% 10Mo 1000/, 100% 100% 100%m/d 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 5(P/o 5CP/o 5W/, 5(E/8 5(P/o I0.99 ] a T1 t-F_ 07= 50/,IF_=oa7 100% 0. 17 1.240.49 3.130.24 0.38C-42 C43m C-45.E-29 C46,E-30 C47.E-3 1 C48. E-32m C-50.E-34m C-52 C-53_D-22 C-55,D29 C-WWII C-57,D3 1 C-58m SA 0.55 0.20 () aa 0.16 0_51 0.43 5W/,0.45 0.24 ma10,25 1 5(P/o–––T–=78 Too%– 0.21 5(P/o =-C63 ECdSSA Cq6 SA [ 100% 100% 5CP/o 1(X)% 100% ICD% 100% 100% FL2 T–IA l– 0.72 100% 0.a 0.79 2.71 1.51 0.73 0.76m8 C C48m Note: The10-Year Roadway Impact FeeCIPis not in a prioritized order. Table 2.D. IO-Year Roadway Impact FeeCapital Improvements Plan - Service Area D Proj. #IF Class R C PA Roadway Limits ILength (mi) lo/oin ;ervice .reano 50% l00% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% FlD2 D-3D4 D-5DaD7 D-8 D-9mlnII D-12 D13 D-14 D-15 D-16 D-17 D-18 D-19 -F -T––-–I -[-BBI -F -t- +H=–t–+–llrr•–-T–––T 0 FISHTRAP GANZER GRIBBLESPRINGS HARTLEEFIELD HARTLEEFIELD HARTLEEFIELD HARTLEE FLD-FNI216+ HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 HARTLEEFLD-FM 2164 HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 LONG MINGO Mn{GO MNGO KINGS ROW SILVERDMgincoLLnqs COOPERCREEK ; –IIn–--1 –––+––– I–––T– 6 MINGOTOGEESLrNG 15.500'E OF SHERMAN TO 4600'W OF SHERMANINDIAN WELLSTO 3015'W OFnqDIAN WELLS 4220' E OF COOPER CREEK TO COOPER CREEK COOPER CREEK TO 5170'W OFCOOPER CREEK 600'E OF SHERMANTO SHERMAN HARTLEE FIELD TO SHERMAN SHERMANTO 3500'W OF SHERMAN STUARTTO 1485'WOFSTUART 475'WOFFM2164TO FM2164 510'WOFFM2164TO FM2164 E CITY LIMITS TOCOOPERCREEKCOOPERCREEKTOLOOP288 LOOP288TO US 380 SILVERDOMETOLOOP288 COOPERCREEKTOFARRISRD HARTLEE FIELD TO 2730’SOF H.-\RTLEEFIELD SHERMAN TO HARTLEE FIELD nl 0.36 3.41 0.57 0.80 0.98 0. 11 0.43 0.66 0.28 0.09mI 0.09 0.44 0.43 0.50 0.41 0.84 1.91 –T–VT–TcTr–r SA SATsn Ts C C SA D20 D-2 1tamI–n–T–[>23 m2D25 D-26 D-27 C-54,D-28 9 C-56,D-30 C-57,D-31 D-32 D-33 D34 D-35 D-36 D37 D38m9m4 l B SA COOPERCREEK COOPERCREEK FM 2164 GREENVALLEY GREENVALLEY INDIAN WELLS INDIAN WELLS INDIAN WELLS I LOCUST LOCUST LOCUST LOCUST SHERMAN SHERMAN SHERMAN SHERMAN SHERMAN SHERMAN V I SILVERDOMETOMINGO MINGOTOUS380MILAM TOLOOP288 2395’s OF FM 215fTf$ WARSCHUN TO SHERMAN 1615’s OFFM2153TO +930’NOFGRI©"ing9dTaPE LOOP288TO HERCULES HERCULESTO BELL BELL TO WINDSOR WINDSOR TO FM 2164 LOOP288TO HERCULES HERCULESTO KINGS S WINDSOR TO WILSONWOOD WILSONWOOD TO CORONADO CORONADO TO GREENWOOD GREENWOODTO BELL 00 t 0.83 0.32 2.62 1.47 0.40 0.73 0.38 0.55 0.43 0.45 0.24 0.25 0.31 0.36 0.38 0.19 0.22 0.31 0. 16 0.32ml 509'/a 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% T-nm SA 100% 100(% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%-m SAM Note: The10-Year RoadwayImpactFeeCIPisnot in a prioritized order. Table 2.E. IO-Year Roadway Impact FeeCapital Improvements Plan - ServiceArea E Proj. # 1 IF Class Roadway Limits .engthIni) a/o in ServiceArm C SA SA SA PA(1/3) C SA CompletedU SA SA SA SA SA SA SAFAFA SA SA SA SA SA(1/2) SA SA C SA SA SA SA SA SA SA SA C PA AUDRA BLAGG BLAGG BLAGG DALLAS DUCHESS FM426 MCKINNEY MCKNNEY MCKINNEY MCKINNEY MCKINNEY MILLS MILLSMINGO MINGOmGmG MINGO MINGO MINGO MINGO MORSE SnADYOAKS SPENCER TREATMEvr PLANT TREATMENTPLANT TREATMEvr PLANT BONNn BRAE BONNIEBRAE BONNn BRAE BONNn BRAE BONNIEBRAE BONNEEBRAE 0 G E F E00 I0 C C 0 TRINITY TOMAYHILL A S L N LE WILLIS TOWITHERST A0 O MAYHILL TO LOOP288 C POSTOAK TO 1325'W OFPOSTOAK0 US 380TO PANHANDLE S C0 I PRAIRIETO IH35ER S 0.22 0.71 0.41 0.04 0.87 0.76 0.57 1.65 0.13 0.22 0.61 0.29 1.40 0.41 0. 14 0.48 0.56ml 0.11 0.44 0.04 0. 19 0.22 0.58 0.44 0.63 0.25 0.75 0.55 0.20 0.22 0.07 0.27 0.16 0.42 0.46 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Wo 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% E F•l FTBT E.7 E-8 E-9 E-10 E-11 E-12 E.13 E-14 E-15 E-16 E- 17 E-18 E-19 E-20 E-21 E-22 E-23 E-24 E-25 E-26 E-27 E.28 C45,E-29 C-46,E-30 C-47,E-3 1 C-48.E-32 C-+9.E-33 C-50,E-34 E.35 E.36 CARDINAL E-37 E-38 E-39 EJtO E'+1 E,+2 E43 E44mn6 E,+7 E'+8 E49 E-50 E-5 1 E-52 E.53 E-54 E.55 E-56 PA PA(1/3) PA(1/3)PA (1,3) PA(1/3) PA(1/3) PAr1 3) PA (13)nl PA(1/3) PA(1/3)PA(1/3) PA (1/3) PA C SA SA PA US380TO BLAGG S S 0 VMAN E L NEWMAN 0 NEWMAN N S K S SPENCERTOEDWARDS 0 COLORADOTO IH35E MAYHLL TO QUAILCREEK MCKFNNFYTO625'N3mim DUCHESS TOSnADY OAKS SHADYOAKSTOSPENCER MILLSTO SPENCER TREAT}vENr PLANTTO EDWARDS EDWARDS TO POCKRUSPAGE EDWARDS TO POCKRUSPAGE DALLASTO IH 35E SPENCERTOROY MAYHILL TON STAR t ; t 1.02 0.26 0.44 0.39 0.15 0.09 0.20 0.37D3D6 0.60 0.52 0.44 0.13 0.16 0.41 0.53 1.30 1.27 0.51 0.50 0.35 0.32 0.2 1 i+I I I I 100(PoT-moTIT(ia 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% R)tPo 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%IT; MAYHEL MAYHEL MAYHLLMAYHnl MAYHEL 4 MAYHILL MAYHEL [ MAYHILL MAYHILL CONNECTOR MOCKnVGBiRD MOCKWGBIRD MOCKNGBIRD POSTOAK POSTOAK POSTOAK SWISHER TEASLEY NSTAR ROY 3 + U TE-57 E-58 E-59 E.60 100% Note: The10-Year RoadwayImpactFeeCIPisnot in a prioritized order. Sec.25-260. Roadway Impact FeesAdopted. TheCity herebyadoptstheMaximum AssessableRoadwayImpact Feeasshown in Schedule1 below, andthe RoadwayImpactFeeCollection Rate asshown in Schedule2 below. Each non- exemptNew Developmentshall beassessedthe Maximum AssessableRoadwayImpact Feeand shall pay the RoadwayImpactFeeCollection Rate, minus any applicable Credits,as described herein.Except asherein otherwiseprovided, the Assessmentand collection of a Roadway Impact Feeshall beadditional andsupplementalto, andnot in substitution of, any othertax, fee, charge or assessmentwhich is lawfully imposed on and due againstthe property. SCHEDULE1 ivIAXlrvlulvl ASSESSABLEROADWAY IMPACT FEEPERSERVICEUNIT Exhibit B Schedule1Maximu ServiceArea RoadwayImpactFee PerServiceUnit 2,496 3, 742 ServiceArea C 4, 695 5,265 SCHEDULE2 ROADWAY llVIPACTFEECOLLECTION RATE PERSERVICEUNIT Exhibit B- Schedule2 RoadwayImpact FeeCollection RatePerServiceUnit Propertiesplatted on or after 1/1/2025 LandUse Type Residential Non-ResidentWl $m7 B 398.40 m7$398.40$m7 398.40$m7 398.40}m7 398.40 Sec.25-261. Roadway Impact FeeRequired. No Final Plat for New Developmentshall be releasedfor filing with DentonCounty without Assessmentof anImpact Feepursuantto this article; or, if no plat is required,then no building permit shall be issued until such Assessment is made and paid in accordance with the Assessment andcollectionproceduresindicatedherein. Sec.25-262.Assessmentof ImpactFees. Assessmentof the ImpactFeefor anyNew Developmentshall bemadeasfollows: (a) For aNew Developmentwhich hasreceivedfinal plat approvalbeforetheeffective dateof this article,Assessmentof ImpactFeesshall occuron theeffective dateof this article, and shall bethe amountof theMaximum AssessableRoadwayImpact FeeperService Unit as setforth in Schedule1of Section25-260. However, the RoadwayImpact FeeCollection Rateshall not be collected on any Service Unit which has received final plat approval before the effective dateof this article and for which avalid building permit is issued within oneyear afterthe dateof adoption of this article. (b) For land which isnot requiredto beplattedatthetime of application for abuilding permit pursuant to the City’s subdivision regulations prior to development, Assessment of RoadwayImpactFeesshall occurat thetime application is madefor the building permit, and shall bethe amount of the Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Feeper Service Unit assetforth in Schedule1of Section25-260thenin effect. (c) For New Developmentwhich issubmitted for approvalpursuantto the City's subdivision regulations or which isproposed for replatting on or after the effective dateof this Article, Assessmentof Impact Feesshall beat the time of final plat or replat approval, and shall be the amount of theMaximum AssessableRoadway Impact Feeper ServiceUnit assetforth in Schedule1of Section25-260then in effect (d) Following Assessmentof the Impact Feepursuantto this Section,the amountof the Impact FeeAssessmentper Service Unit for that development cannot be increased, unless the owner proposesto change the approved development by the submission of a new applicationfor final plat approvalor otherdevelopmentapplication thatresultsin approval of additional ServiceUnits, in which caseanewAssessmentshall occuratthe Schedule1 of Section25-260ratethenin effect for suchadditional ServiceUnits. (e) TheDirector of Engineeringor hisor herdesigneeshallcomputetheRoadwayImpactFees for New Developmentby first determining whethertheNew Development is eligible for Creditscalculatedin accordancewith this article,which would further reduceImpact Fees otherwisedue in wholeor in part. Thetotal amountof ImpactFeesfor the New Developmentshallbeattachedtothe developmentapplication asacondition of approval. (f) Approval of anamendingplat pursuantto Tex. Loc. Gov't Code,Section212.016 andthe City's subdivision regulations is not subject to reassessmentfor an Impact Fee. (g)For the following usesin tableprovidedin Section258(h)of this article, Land Use EquivalencyTable Land of the Roadway Impact FeeStudy,the maximum Service Unit charge will be cappedat 1.92 vehicle miles per development unit: General Light Industrial, General Heavy Industrial, and Industrial Park. Sec.25-263. Exemptions to Impact Fees. The following are exempt from the applicability of this article: (a) Pursuantto Tex.Loe. Gov't CodeSection395.022,asamended,apublic school district is not required to pay RoadwayImpact Feesimposedunderthis article unlessthe board of trusteesof the district consentsto the paymentof the feesby entering acontractwith the City imposing the fees. (b) A change in usethat generateslessthan 10times the number of Service Units attributable to the immediatelyprecedinguseis exemptfrom thepaymentoflmpact Fees. Sec.25-264. Collection of Impact Fees. Roadway Impact Feesshall becollected in the following manner; however, the City hasthe ability to requireconstructiongreaterthan the Roadway Impact FeeCollection Ratefor amountsup to theMaximum AssessableRoadway Impact Fee: (a) The Roadway Impact FeeCollection Rate shall be paid at the time the City issuesa building permit for aNew Development. (b) For propertiesrequiringa plat,the RoadwayImpactFeeCollection Rateto bepaid and collectedperServiceUnit for New Developmentshall betheamount listed in Schedule2 of Section25-260in effect at the time of final plat approval for up to a one-yearperiod following suchfinal plat approval. After the one-yearperiod hasexpired, the Roadway ImpactFeeCollectionRateshallbepaid accordingtothecurrentamountlisted in Schedule 2 of Section25-260 then in effect. (c) For propertiesthatdo not requirethe filing of a plat, the RoadwayImpact FeeCollection Rateshall bepaid andcollected per ServiceUnit for New Development in the amount listed in Schedule2 of Section25-260in effect atthetime that thebuilding permit is filed. (d) if the building permitfor which an Impact Feehas beenpaid hasexpired,and a new application isthereafterfiled, the RoadwayImpactFeeCollection Rateshall becomputed usingSchedule2of Section25-260in effectatthetime of thenewapplication,with Credits for previouspaymentof ImpactFeesbeingappliedagainstthenew ImpactFeesdue. (e) Wheneverthe property owner proposesto increasethe number of Service Units for a development,the additionalImpact Feescollectedfor suchnew ServiceUnits shall be determined by using Schedule2 of Section 25-260 in effect at the time of the request, and suchadditional fee shall be collected at the times prescribedby this section. (f) TheCity may vary theratesof collection or amount of RoadwayImpactFeesper Service Unit among or within Service Areas in order to reasonablyfurther goals and policies affectingtheadequacyof roadwayfacilities servingNew Development,or otherregulatory purposesaffecting the type, quality, intensity, economicdevelopmentpotential or development timing of:land useswithin such Service Areas. (g) TheMaximum AssessableRoadwayImpact FeeperServiceUnit for RoadwayFacilities, asmaybe amendedfrom time to time, herebyis declaredto be an approximateand appropriatemeasureof the impactsgeneratedby anew unit of developmenton the City’s RoadwaySystem.To the extentthat the Roadway Impact Fee Collection Rate charged against a New Development,as may be amendedfrom time to time, is less than the Maximum AssessableRoadway Impact Feeper Service Unit assessed,such difference herebyis declaredto be foundedon policies unrelatedto measurementof the impactsof theNew Developmenton theCity’sroadwaysystem.TheMaximum AssessableRoadway ImpactFeemay beusedin evaluatinganyclaim by apropertyownerthat thededicationor constructionof aCapital Improvementwithin a ServiceArea imposedasa condition of developmentapprovalpursuantto the City’s subdivision or developmentregulations is disproportionateto the impactscreatedby the development on the City’s Roadway System. Sec.25-265. Credits against Impact Fees. TheCity may credit the contribution of land, improvementsor funding for construction of any SystemFacility that isrequired or agreedto by the City, pursuantto rules establishedin this section or pursuantto administrative guidelines promulgated by the City with the following limitations: (a) TheCredit shall beassociatedwith the plat or other detailedplan of developmentfor the property that is to be servedby the Roadway Facility. (b) Master PlannedCommunity projects, including subdivisionscontaining multiple phases, and whether approved before or after the effective date of these Impact Feeregulations, mayapply for CreditsagainstRoadwayImpact Feesfor the entireproject basedupon contributionsof land,improvementsor fundstoward constructionof systemfacilities, or other Roadway Capital Improvementssupplying excesscapacity. Credits shall be determinedby comparing costsof Roadway Capital Improvements supplied by the project with the costsof Roadway Capital Improvements to be utilized by development within the project, utilizing a methodology approved by the City. The Credit determination shall be incorporatedwithin an agreement for Credits, in accordancewith this Article. The Roadway requirementsof an agreementfor Credits shall not be lessthan what is required by the Denton Development Code. (c) The City's currentpolicies andregulationsshall applyto determineaNew Development’s obligationsto constructadjacentSystemFacilities. The obligation to construct,however, shallnot exceedtheMaximum AssessableRoadwayImpactFeeassessedagainstthe New DevelopmentunderSchedule1 of Section 25-260 of this article. Construction required undersuchpolicies andregulations shall be a Credit againstthe amount of Impact Fees otherwise due. If the costs of constructing a System Facility in accordance with the current City policies andregulationsare greaterthan the amountof the RoadwayImpact Fee Collection Ratedue,the amountof the Credit dueshall be deemedto be 100% of the assessedImpactFeesandno ImpactFeeshall becollectedthereafterfor thedevelopment, unless the number of Service Units is subsequently increased. (d) All CreditsagainstRoadwayImpact Feesshall be baseduponstandardspromulgated by the City, which maybe adoptedas administrativeguidelines,including the following standards: (1) No Creditshallbegivenfor thededicationor constructionof Site-relatedFacilities. (2) No Credit shallbegiven for a RoadwayFacility which is not identified within the RoadwayImpactFeeCapitalImprovementsPlan. (3) in no eventwill the City granta Credit when no RoadwayImpact Feescan be collectedpursuantto thisArticle or for anyamountexceedingtheRoadwayImpact FeeCollection Rateduefor the development, unlessexpressly agreedto by the City In wrltlng. (4) TheCitymayparticipatein thecostsof a SystemFacility to bededicatedto the City, including coststhat exceedthe amount of the Impact Feesdue for the development, in accordancewith policies and rules established by the City. The amountof anyCredit for construction of a SystemFacility shall be reducedby the amountof anyparticipation funds received from the City. (5) Where funds for Roadway Facilities have beenescrowedunder an agreement that wasexecutedwith the City prior to the effective dateof this article, the following rules apply: i. Fundsexpendedunder the agreementfor Roadway Facilities shall first be credited againstthe amount of Roadway Impact Feesthat would have been dueunder Schedule2 of Section 25-260 of this article for thoseunits of development for which building permits already have been issued; ii. Any remainingfunds shall be creditedagainstImpact Feesdue for the developmentunderSchedule2 of Section25-260 of this article atthe time building permits are issued. (e) Creditsfor construction of Capital Improvements shall be deemedcreatedwhen the Capital Improvementsarecompletedandthe City hasacceptedthe facility, or in the caseof Capital Improvementsconstructedandacceptedprior to theEffective Dateof this Article, on such effectivedate.Creditscreatedafterthe Effective Dateof this Article shall expire ten (10) yearsfrom the datethe Credit wascreated.Credits arising prior to suchEffective Date shall expire ten (10) yearsfrom sucheffective date.Upon application bythe property owner, the City may agreetoextendthe expiration datefor the Crediton mutually agreeableterms. (f) Unless an agreement for Credits, as described herein, is executed providing for a different mannerof applyingCreditsagainstRoadwayImpactFeesdue,aCredit associatedwith a plat shall be applied at the time of application for the first building permit and, at each building permit application thereafter, to reduce Impact Fees due until the Credit is exhausted (g) An owner of a New Development who has constructedor financed a Roadway Capital Improvement or Roadway Facility expansion designatedin the Roadway Impact Fee CapitalImprovementsPlans,or other RoadwayCapital Improvementthat supplies excess capacity,asrequiredor authorizedby the City, shall enterinto anagreementwith the City to provide for Creditsagainst Roadway Impact Feesdue for the development in accordance with this paragraph.Theagreementshallidentifythe basisfor andthe methodfor computing andthe amountof the Credit dueandany reduction in Creditsattributable to consumptionof roadcapacityby developedlots or tractsservedby the RoadwayCapital Improvements. For multi-phasedprojects,the City may requirethat total Credits be proportionally allocatedamongthe phases.If authorizedby the City, the agreementalso mayprovidefor allocationof CreditsamongNew Developmentswithin theproject,and provisions for thetiming andcollection of ImpactFees. Section 25-266. Use of Proceedsof Impact Fee Accounts. TheRoadwayImpact Feescollectedfor eachServiceArea pursuantto theseregulationsmay be usedto finance or to recoup the costs of any roadway improvements or facility expansions identified in theRoadwayImpactFeeCapital ImprovementsPlanfor the ServiceArea, including but not limited to the construction contract price, surveying and engineering fees, and land acquisitioncosts(including land purchases,court awardsand costs, attorney'sfees,and expert witnessfees).RoadwayImpactFeesmay alsobe usedto pay the principal sumand interest and otherfinancecostsonbonds,notesor otherobligations issuedby or onbehalfof theCity to finance suchroadway improvementsor facility expansions.Roadway Impact Feesalsomay beused to pay feesactuallycontractedto bepaidto an independentqualified engineeror financial consultantfor preparationof or updatingthe RoadwayImpact FeeCapital ImprovementsPlan. Impact Fees collectedmaynot beusedtopay for the expensesprohibited by TLGC Chapter395 . Section25-267. Establishmentof Accounts. TheCity's FinanceDepartmentshall establishan accountto which interestis allocatedfor each ServiceArea for which a RoadwayImpact Feeis imposedpursuantto this article. Each Impact Feecollected within the Service Area shall be deposited in such account with the following regulations: (a) Interestearnedon theaccount into which the Impact Feesaredepositedshall beconsidered funds of the accountand shall be usedsolely for the purposesauthorized in this article and TLGCChapter395. (b) TheCity'sFinanceDepartmentshall establishadequatefinancial andaccountingcontrols to ensurethat RoadwayImpactFeesdisbursedfrom theaccountareutilized solely for the purposesauthorized in this Article and TLGC Chapter 395. Disbursement of funds shall beauthorized by the City at suchtimes asarereasonably necessary to carry out the purposes andintent of thisArticle; provided, however,that any RoadwayImpact Feepaid shall be expendedwithin a reasonableperiod of time, but not to exceedten (10) years from the date the fee is depositedinto the account. (c) The City's FinanceDepartmentshall maintain and keep financial records for Roadway Impact Fees,which shall showthe sourceanddisbursementof all feescollected in or expendedfrom eachServiceArea. The recordsof the account into which Impact Feesare depositedshall beopenfor public inspectionandcopyingduring ordinary businesshours. The City may establishafee for copying services. Sec.25-268.ImpactFeeasAdditional and SupplementalRegulation. RoadwayImpact Feesestablishedby theseregulations areadditional and supplemental to, and not in substitution of, any otherrequirements imposed by the City on the development of land or the issuanceof building permits or certificates of occupancy. Such Impact Feesare intended to be consistentwith andto further the policies of the Denton Plan,the Capital Improvements Plan, the zoning ordinances,subdivision regulations and other City policies, ordinances andresolutions by which theCity seeksto ensuretheprovision of adequatepublic facilities in conjunction with the developmentof:land.This article shall not affect, in any manner,the permissibleuseof property, densityof development,design,and improvement standardsand requirements,or anyother aspect of the developmentof:landor provisionof public improvementssubjectto the zoning and subdivisionregulationsor otherregulationsandpolicies of the City, which shall beoperative and remainin full force and effect without limitation with respectto all suchdevelopment. Sec.25-269. Updates to Plans and Revision of Fees. TheCity shall updateits Land Use Assumptionsand Capital ImprovementsPlanand make anyrevision of fees asindicatedbelow: (a)The City shall updateits Land Use Assumptionsand RoadwayImpactFee Capital Improvements Plansand shall recalculatethe Roadway Impact Fees basedthereon in accordancewith theproceduresset forth in TexasLocal Gov’t Code, Ch. 395, or in any successorstatute.However,this doesnot precludetheCity from reviewingits Land Use Assumptions,RoadwayImpactFeeCapital ImprovementsPlans,RoadwayImpact Fees, and otherfactors suchasmarket conditions more frequently than provided for herein to determinewhethertheLand UseAssumptionsandRoadwayCapital ImprovementsPlans shouldbe updatedand the RoadwayImpact Fees recalculatedaccordingly, utilizing statutory update procedures. (b) Schedule2 of 25-260of this article may be amendedwithout revising the Land Use AssumptionsandRoadwayCapital Improvements Plansat any time prior to the update provided for in this Section,provided that the Roadway Impact FeeCollection Rate to be collectedunderSchedule2 of 25-260 do not exceedthe Maximum AssessableRoadway ImpactFeesassessedunderSchedule1of 25-260of this article. (c) if, at the time an updateis required asindicated hereinand the City Council determines that no changeto the Land Use Assumptions, Roadway Impact FeeCapital Improvements Planor Roadway Impact Feesareneeded,it may dispensewith suchupdate by following the procedures in Texas Local Gov't Code, Section 395.0575 or its successor statute. (d) TheCity may amendanyotherprovisions of this Article in accordancewith procedures for ordinanceamendmentscontained in the City’s Charter or Statelaw. Sec.25-270. Refunds (a) Upon application,any RoadwayImpact Feeor portion thereof collected pursuantto this article, which hasnot beenexpendedwithin the ServiceArea within ten (10) years from thedateof payment,shall berefundedto the recordowner of the property for which the ImpactFeewaspaid or, if the Impact Feewas paid by another governmental entity, to such governmentalentity,togetherwith interestcalculatedfrom thedateof collection to thedate of refund atthe statutoryrateassetforth in Sec.302.002,Tex. Fin. Code,or its successor statute.Theapplicationfor refund pursuantto this sectionshall be submittedwithin sixty (60) daysaftertheexpirationof theten-yearperiod for expenditureof theImpact Fee.An Impact Feeshall beconsideredexpendedon a first-in, first out basis. (b) An Impact Feecollected pursuant to this article shall also be considered expended if the total expenditures for Capital Improvements or Roadway Facility expansions authorized within the ServiceAreawithin ten (10) yearsfollowing the dateof paymentexceedsthe total fees collected within the Service Area for such improvements or expansions during suchperiod. (c) if arefund is duepursuantto Subsections(a) or (b), theCity shall dividethe difference betweenthe amountof expendituresandthe amount of the Impact Feescollected by the total numberof ServiceUnits assumedwithin the ServiceArea for the period to determine the refund dueper ServiceUnit. The refund to the recordowner shall be calculated by multiplying the refund due per Service Unit by the number of Service Units for the developmentfor which the feewaspaid, and interestdueshall becalculatedupon thatamount. Sec.25-271. Rebates. If thebuildingpermit for aNew Developmentfor which aRoadwayImpactFeehasbeenpaid has expired,and a modified or new application has not been filed within six (6) months of such expiration,the City shall, uponwritten application, rebatethe amount of the Impact Fee to the recordownerof thepropertyfor which the Impact Feewas paid. If no applicationfor rebate pursuant to this subsection hasbeen filed within this period, no rebate shall become due. Sec.25-272.Appeals. Thepropertyowneror applicantfor New Developmentmay appealthe applicability or amountof the RoadwayImpact Feeor the availability or amount of Creditsor Refundsto the City Council usingthefollowingprocedure: (a) Theburdenof proof shall beon the applicantto demonstratethat relief shouldbe granted bytheCity. (b) Theapplicantmustfile awritten noticeof appealwith the City Manageror designeewithin thirty (30) daysfollowing thedecisionbeingappealed.Along with thenotice of appeal,an applicantmay requestanalternativeServiceUnit computationfor land usesnot contained with the latestedition of the ITE Trip GenerationManual by submitting atrip generation study demonstratingthe appropriatenessof the trip generation rates for the proposed development.An applicantmay alsoincludeanalternativeServiceUnit calculation. (c) TheCity Manageror designee("Manager")may(1) resolvethe appeal,if the applicant agreeswith theManager'sdecision,or (2) if the applicantdoesnot agree,refer the matter to theCity Councilfor decision,alongwith theManager'srecommendationandanytrip generation study provided, if any. (d) if City Council review isrequestedby the applicantafterreceivingtheManager’sdecision, the City Secretaryshall schedulea public hearingat which the applicantmay present testimonyandevidencebeforethe City Council. TheCity Council shall act onthe appeal within 60 daysofreceiptof thenotice of appealby theCity, unlessotherwiseagreedby the Applicant. (e) if thenotice of appealis accompaniedby apaymentor other securitysatisfactory to the City Attorney in anamountequalto theoriginal determinationof theRoadwayImpact Fee due,the City shall processandmay issuea building permit if otherrequirementsaremet while the appeal is pending. (f) if theCity Councilallows foradifferent amountof theRoadwayImpactFeeduefor aNew Development under this sectionto be paid, it may causeto beappropriated from other City funds the amountof the reduction in the Impact Feeto the account for the Service Area in whichthepropertyislocated. Sec25-273. Severability. If anyprovision of this Article or theapplication of any provision to any personor circumstance is held invalid,the invalidity shallnot affectother provisions or applicationsof the Article which canbegiveneffect without the invalid provision or application, andto this endthe provisions of this Article are declared to be severable. Sec25-274. Conflicts. This Article shall becumulativeof all provisions of ordinancesandof theCodeof Ordinancesfor theCity ofDenton,Texas,asamended,exceptwhereprovisionsof this articlearein directconflict with theprovisionsof suchordinancesor suchCode,in which eventthe conflicting provisions of such ordinances and Code arehereby repealed. 25-275. Effective Date This Article shall take effecton January 1,2025 or immediately from andafter its passageand publication in accordancewith theprovisions of the TexasLocal GovernmentCode,whichever is later, and it is accordingly so ordained. SECTION 9. This Ordinanceshall take effect on January1, 2025, and it is accordingly soordained. The motion to approve this ordiQancewas made by J . ) 1 Jcs4t / and secondedby ] a , HeIIL- J , the ordinance was passedand approved by thefollowingvoteK - E : Aye Nay Abstain Absent Mayor Gerard Hudspeth: VickiByrd,District1: BrianBeck,District2: -LZ ,Z \/ y ./ / PaulMeltzer,District3: JoeHolland,District4: BrandonChaseMcGee,AtLargePlace5: JillJester,At LargePlace6: tA+- d,y,f J-\ PASSEDANDAPPROVEDthis ,2024. GERARDHUDSPETH,MAYOR ATTEST: LAUREN THODEN, CITY SECRETARY ah+WIllAPPROVEDAS TO LEGAL FORM: MACK REINWAND, CITY ATTORNEY By . Mack?eihwana (;+,%,7$ 52$':$<,03$&7)((678'<   CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ROADWAY IMPACT FEE STUDY May 2024 Prepared for Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 801 Cherry Street, Unit 11, Suite 1300 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Phone 817.335.6511 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Project Number: 067390001 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ROADWAY IMPACT FEE STUDY May 2024 Prepared for the City of Denton Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 801 Cherry Street, Unit 11, Suite 1300 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Phone 817 335 6511 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Project Number: 067390001 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. III I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 II. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................................... 3 A. Purpose and Overview ..................................................................................................................... 3 B. Land Use Assumptions Methodology .............................................................................................. 4 C. Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas .............................................................................................. 5 D. Residential and Employment ............................................................................................................ 7 E. Land Use Assumptions Summary...................................................................................................... 7 III. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ................................................. 9 IV. COMPUTATION METHOD FOR ROADWAY IMPACT FEES ................................................ 20 A. Service Areas ................................................................................................................................... 20 B. Service Units ..................................................................................................................................... 20 C. Cost Per Service Unit ...................................................................................................................... 22 D. Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costing Methodology ...................................................................... 22 1. Project Information ................................................................................................................... 23 2. Construction Cost ...................................................................................................................... 24 3. Allowances ................................................................................................................................. 24 E. Summary of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costs ............................................................................ 25 F. Service Unit Calculation ................................................................................................................. 31 V. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULATION ........................................................................... 36 A. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit ................................................................... 36 B. Plan for Financing and the Ad Valorem Tax Credit ................................................................. 38 C. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Determination ...................................................................... 39 D. Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development ........................................................................ 43 VI. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS .................................................................................................. 49 VII. ADOPTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEES ................................. 50 A. Adoption Process ............................................................................................................................. 50 B. Collection and Use of Transportation Impact Fees ................................................................... 50 VIII. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................. 51 APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................. 52 A. Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections B. Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Supply C. Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory D. Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit Summary E. Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit Supporting Exhibits F. Consideration for the Hunter Ranch and Cole Ranch Operating Agreements 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas ii List of Exhibits 1 Proposed Service Areas ........................................................................................................................ 6 2 Citywide Future Land Use Plan ............................................................................................................. 8 3 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Service Area A ............................................................................................................................. 15 Service Area B .............................................................................................................................. 16 Service Area C ............................................................................................................................. 17 Service Area D ............................................................................................................................. 18 Service Area E .............................................................................................................................. 19 List of Tables 1 Residential and Employment 10-Year Growth Projections ............................................................. 7 2 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Service Area A ............................................................................................................................. 10 Service Area B .............................................................................................................................. 11 Service Area C ............................................................................................................................. 12 Service Area D ............................................................................................................................. 13 Service Area E .............................................................................................................................. 14 3A Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities .......................................................................................... 21 3B Service Volumes for Existing Facilities .............................................................................................. 21 4 Construction Cost Pay Items ................................................................................................................ 24 5 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections Service Area A ............................................................................................................................. 26 Service Area B .............................................................................................................................. 27 Service Area C ............................................................................................................................. 28 Service Area D ............................................................................................................................. 29 Service Area E .............................................................................................................................. 30 6 Transportation Demand Factor Calculations ................................................................................... 34 7 Ten Year Growth Projections ............................................................................................................. 35 8 Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Calculation ........................................................ 36-37 9 Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee ................................................................................... 43 10 Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) ............................................................. 45-46 11 Land Use Descriptions .................................................................................................................... 47-48 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by new development. Across the country, they are used to fund police and fire facilities, parks, schools, roads and utilities. In Texas, the legislature has allowed their use for water, wastewater, roadway and drainage facilities. They have been used to fund public water and wastewater improvements since 1998 and transportation improvements since 2016 in the City of Denton. In the most basic terms, impact fees are meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of each new unit of development creating new infrastructure needs. In the case of roadway impact fees, the infrastructure need is the increased capacity on arterial and collector roadways that serve the overall transportation system. The purpose of the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study is to identify the fee per unit of new development necessary to fund these improvements in accordance with the enabling legislation, Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Impact Fee Basics Transportation Impact Fees are determined by several key variables, each described below in greater detail. Impact Fee Study The primary purpose of the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study is to determine the maximum impact fee per unit of new development chargeable as allowed by the state law. This determination is not a recommendation; the actual fee amount ultimately collected is at the discretion of the Denton City Council, so long as it does not exceed the maximum assessable allowed by law. The study looks at a period of 10 years to project new growth and corresponding capacity needs, as required by state law. The study and corresponding maximum fees must be restudied at least every five years. However, the study can be updated at any time to accommodate significant changes in any of the key variables of the impact fee equation. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas iv Service Areas A Service Area is a geographic area within which a unique maximum impact fee is determined. All fees collected within the Service Area must be spent on eligible improvements within the same Service Area. For Roadway Impact Fees, the Service Area may not exceed six miles. In Denton, this restriction necessitated the creation of five separate Service Areas. A map of the Service Areas can be found on Page 6. In defining the Service Area boundaries, the project team considered the corporate boundary, required size limit, adjacent land uses, and topography. Since each Service Area has a unique maximum impact fee, the per-unit maximum fee for an identical land use will vary from one Service Area to the next. For this reason, the team contained areas of uniform land use within the same Service Area boundary where possible. Land Use Assumptions The maximum Roadway Impact Fee determination is required to be based on the projected growth and corresponding capacity needs in a 10-year window. This study considers the years 2022-2032. In order to arrive at a reasonable projection of growth, all vacant parcels were inventoried. It was assumed that vacant parcels would develop according to the Future Land Use Plan specified in the Comprehensive Plan (Pg. 8). To project future development in the ten-year window, the known developing areas within the city were assumed to be fully developed by the year 2032. Research of historical building permits was performed to compare the projected growth of these known development areas against historical data. Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) The Roadway Impact Fee CIP is distinct and separate from the City’s traditional Capital Improvements Plan. The Roadway Impact Fee CIP is simply the list of projects eligible for funding through impact fees. Only those capacity improvements included in the City’s adopted Mobility Plan are included in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP. Capacity improvements may include the addition of lanes, intersection improvements, or the extension of a new road. Resurfacing or other maintenance activities do not qualify as capacity improvements under impact fee law in Texas. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas v Only the projects listed in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP are eligible to utilize impact fee funds. In order to optimize future flexibility, all capacity improvement projects included in the Mobility Plan are included in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP and will be eligible to utilize impact fee funds. Only the costs associated with providing the additional capacity necessitated by 10-years of growth can be used to calculate the maximum impact fee. In order to calculate the maximum impact fee, the total cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP at build- out was reduced to account for: x The portion of new capacity that will address existing needs, and x The portion of new capacity that will not be necessitated until beyond the 10-year growth window. A ratio that compares 10 years’ demand for capacity to the net supply of capacity (total new capacity in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP minus existing needs) can be calculated. This ratio, which may not exceed 100%, is then applied to the cost of the net capacity supplied. The result is a determination of the costs attributable to the next 10 years’ growth, which is then used to calculate the maximum impact fee in accordance with state law. The result is known as the cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP Attributable to Growth (i.e. recoverable portion of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP): SERVICE AREA: A B C D E Recoverable Cost of Roadway Impact Fee CIP and Financing $99,742,506 $61,268,086 $147,114,364 $61,257,141 $89,881,134 Service Units The impact fee law defines a service unit as follows: “Service Unit means a standardized measure of consumption attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and trends applicable to the political subdivision in which the individual unit of development is located during the previous 10 years.” The 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study defines a service unit as the number of vehicle-miles. Based on the City’s 10-year growth projections the associated demand (consumption) values for each service area are as follows in terms of vehicle-miles: 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas vi SERVICE AREA: A B C D E Total Veh-Mi Demand Over Ten Years 39,968 16,374 31,332 11,634 24,148 Impact Fee Calculation The maximum impact fee allowable in each of the five service areas is then calculated by dividing the Roadway Impact Fee CIP Attributable to Growth by the number of vehicle-miles in the corresponding Service Area in the above table. This calculation is performed for each service area individually; each service area has a stand-alone Roadway Impact Fee CIP and 10-year growth projection. Below is the listing of the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study’s Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile): SERVICE AREA: A B C D E 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Maximum Assessable Fee Per Vehicle-Mile $2,496 $3,742 $4,695 $5,265 $3,722 Chapter 395 Required Adoption Process Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of Roadway Impact Fees. A Capital Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC) is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Impact Fees CIP used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee’s findings for consideration by the City Council. This CIAC also reviews the Roadway Impact Fee ordinance and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the CIAC is required to adequately represent the building and development communities. The City Council then conducts a first public hearing on the Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Impact Fee CIP and a second public hearing on the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the CIAC is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the Roadway Impact Fees CIP at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the CIAC oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas vii Collection and Use of Transportation Impact Fees Roadway Impact fees are assessed when a final plat is recorded. The assessment defines the impact of each unit at the time of platting, according to land use, and may not exceed the maximum impact fee allowed by law. Roadway Impact Fees are collected when a building permit is issued. Therefore, funds are not collected until development-impacts are introduced to the transportation system. Funds collected within a service area can be used only within the same service area. Finally, fees must be utilized within 10 years of collection, or must be refunded with interest. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 1 I. INTRODUCTION Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure political subdivisions must follow in order to create and implement impact fees. Senate Bill 243 (SB 243) amended Chapter 395 in 2001 to define an Impact Fee as “a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development.” The City retained Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide professional transportation engineering services for the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study. This report includes details of the Roadway Impact Fee calculation methodology in accordance with Chapter 395, the applicable Land Use Assumptions, development of the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan, and the Land Use Equivalency Table. This report references two of the basic inputs to the Roadway Impact Fee: 1) Land Use Assumptions (Pg. 3) 2) Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) (Pg. 9) Information from these Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Impact Fee CIP is used extensively throughout the remainder of the report. There is a detailed discussion of the methodology for the computation of impact fees. This discussion is broken into three components: 1) Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees (Pg. 20) 2) Roadway Impact Fee Calculation (Pg. 36) 3) Plan for Financing and the Ad Valorem Tax Credit (Pg. 38) 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 2 The components of the Computation Method for Roadway Impact Fee include development of: x Service Areas (Pg. 20) x Service Units (Pg. 20) x Cost Per Service Unit (Pg. 22) x Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costing Methodology (Pg. 22) x Summary of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costs (Pg. 25) x Service Unit Calculation (Pg. 31) The Roadway Impact Fee is then calculated as: x Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Pg. 36) x Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development (Pg. 43) The report also includes a section concerning the Plan for Financing and the Ad Valorem Tax Credit. This involves the calculation of the applicable credit required by law to offset the City’s use of ad valorem taxes to help fund the Roadway Impact Fee CIP. This plan, prepared by NewGen Strategies, and upon which we relied, details the maximum assessable impact fee per service unit the City of Denton may apply under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 3 II. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS A. Purpose and Overview In order to assess an impact fee, Land Use Assumptions must be developed to provide the basis for residential and employment growth projections within a political subdivision. As defined by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, these assumptions include a description of changes in land uses, densities, and development in the service area. The land use assumptions are then used in determining the need and timing of transportation improvements to serve future development. Information from the following sources was compiled to complete the land use assumptions: x Denton Plan 2040 (City of Denton Comprehensive Plan) x Denton County Appraisal District (DCAD) x North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) x City of Denton staff x Denton 2022 Mobility Plan The Land Use Assumptions include the following components: x Land Use Assumptions Methodology – An overview of the general methodology used to generate the land use assumptions. x Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas – Explanation of the division of Denton into service areas for transportation facilities. x Residential and Employment– Data on residential and employment growth within the service area over the next ten years (2022 – 2032). x Land Use Assumptions Summary – A synopsis of the land use assumptions. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 4 The residential and employment estimates and projections were compiled in accordance with the following categories: Residential: Number of residential dwelling units, both single and multi-family. Employment: Square feet of building area based on three (3) different classifications. Each classification has unique trip making characteristics. Retail: Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods which primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented toward the household sector, such as grocery stores and restaurants. Service: Land use activities which provide personal and professional services, such as government and other professional offices. Basic: Land use activities that produce goods and services such as those which are exported outside of the local economy, such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses. The above categories in the Land Use Assumptions match those used to develop the travel demand model for the City of Denton. These broader categories are used in the development of the assumptions for impact fees; however, expanded classifications used in the assessment of impact fees are found in the Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (Pg. 45). B. Land Use Assumptions Methodology The residential and employment growth projections formulated in this report were performed using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles. The following factors were considered in developing these projections: x Character, type, density, and quantity of existing development; x Current zoning plans; x Future Land Use Plan (based on Denton 2040 Comprehensive Plan); x Growth trends; x Location of vacant land; 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 5 x Physical restrictions (i.e. flood plains, railroads); and x Physical development capacity of Denton. Existing residential and employment estimates were obtained using Denton Central Appraisal District (DCAD) parcel data and an aerial survey of existing development. For the remaining undeveloped areas, assumptions based upon the City’s Future Land Use Plan were used to estimate the ultimate buildout of residential and employment development. To project future development in the ten-year window, the known developing areas within the city were assumed to be fully developed by the year 2032. C. Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee service areas for transportation facilities is shown in Exhibit 1. The City of Denton is currently divided into five (5) service areas, each based upon the six (6) mile limit, as required in Chapter 395 (explained on Pg. 20). For roadway facilities, the service areas as required by state law are limited to areas within the current corporate limits. Therefore, areas within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) and non-annexation areas (NAAs) are excluded from this study. It should be noted that at locations where service area boundaries follow a City thoroughfare facility, the proposed boundary is intended to follow the centerline of the roadway, unless otherwise noted. In cases where a service area boundary follows the City Limits, only those portions of the transportation facility within the City Limits are included in the service area. A C B E D Legend Service Areas A B C D E ETJ NAA Exhibit 1 - Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study 00.51Miles ¯ 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 7 D. Residential and Employment Residential and Employment estimates for the base year (2022) were performed based upon a survey of the existing land uses on DCAD parcel data, and aerial verification. Build-out projections were prepared by combining the existing land uses within the service area with reasonable density assumptions for undeveloped land based upon the Denton 2040 Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use Plan. Ten-year growth projections were prepared based upon historic growth trends, location of recent and known development within the City, and consultation with City staff. Exhibit 2 presents the existing City limits and the proposed service areas, combined with the Future Land Use Plan. E. Land Use Assumptions Summary Table 1 summarizes the residential and employment 10-year growth projections. The projected growth over the next ten years is reasonable compared to the historical growth over the previous ten years, as described in the Land Use Assumptions Methodology (page 4). Table 1. Residential and Employment 10-Year Projections Residential Employment Service Area Single Family Multi-Family Basic Service Retail Dwelling Units Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. A 3,212 970 2,843,000 591,000 871,000 B 2,009 387 415,000 238,000 285,000 C 1,538 1,015 3,518,000 689,000 446,000 D 847 215 815,000 206,000 287,000 E 1,219 1,291 1,831,000 519,000 505,000 Sub-Total 8,825 3,878 9,422,000 2,243,000 2,394,000 Total 12,703 14,059,000 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 8 Exhibit 2– Citywide Future Land Use Map Figure 2 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 9 III. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Development of a 10-year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan is required per Chapter 395 of the Texas local Government Code. To accomplish this, the current Denton Mobility Plan has been updated using a Denton-specific Travel Demand Model. The Travel Demand Model was developed using the existing roadway network and residential and employment data to develop a baseline scenario. This scenario was calibrated using existing vehicle counts. Several build-out scenarios were run using the build-out residential and employment data to assist in completing the updated mobility plan map. This updated mobility plan map serves as the basis for this Roadway Impact Fee CIP. The Roadway Impact Fee CIP includes arterial and collector class roadway facilities that serve the overall transportation system, as well as major intersection improvements. All the facilities identified are included in the proposed mobility plan map. The proposed Roadway Impact Fee CIP is listed in Tables 2.A – 2.E and mapped in Exhibits 3.A – 3.E. The tables show the length of each project as well as the facility’s Mobility Plan classification. The Roadway Impact Fee CIP was developed in conjunction with input from City of Denton staff and represents those projects that will be needed to accommodate the growth projected in the Land Use Assumptions section of this report. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 10 Table 2.A. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area A Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area A-1 SA CORBIN IH-35W TO CORBIN 0.58 100% A-2 SA CORBIN 500' S OF SPRINGSIDE TO CORBIN 0.27 100% A-3 PA FM 1515 IH 35W TO CORBIN 1.13 100% A-4 PA FM 1515 CORBIN TO WESTERN 0.22 100% A-5 PA FM 1515 WESTERN TO WESTCOURT 0.29 100% A-6 PA FM 1515 WESTCOURT TO MASCH BRANCH 0.12 100% A-7 PA FM 1515 TOM COLE TO 3435' W OF TOM COLE 0.65 100% A-8 PA FM 1515 3435' W OF TOM COLE TO 530' E OF C WOLFE 0.71 100% A-9 PA H LIVELY C WOLFE TO 2145' W OF H LIVELY 0.41 50% A-10 PA H LIVELY 2145' W OF H LIVELY TO 2150' W OF ED ROBSON 0.74 100% A-11 C IH-35-CORBIN IH-35 TO CORBIN 0.84 100% A-12 SA JIM CHRISTAL IH 35 TO OLD SH 24 0.59 100% A-13,C-10 SA JIM CHRISTAL OLD SH 24 TO WESTERN 0.55 50% A-14,C-11 SA JIM CHRISTAL WESTERN TO MASCH BRANCH 0.66 50% A-15,C-12 SA JIM CHRISTAL MASCH BRANCH TO THOMAS J EGAN 1.13 50% A-16,C-13 SA JIM CHRISTAL THOMAS J EGAN TO 515' E OF C WOLFE 0.75 50% A-17 C PRECISION-WESTERN PRECISION TO WESTERN 0.65 100% A-18 PA ROBSON RANCH IH 35W TO ED ROBSON 1.65 50% A-19 PA ROBSON RANCH ED ROBSON TO YARBROUGH 1.35 50% A-20 SA SPRINGSIDE CORBIN TO UNDERWOOD 0.35 100% A-21 SA SPRINGSIDE UNDERWOOD TO WESTCOURT 0.16 100% A-22 C TJ EGAN-LOOP 288 LOOP 288 TO 2440' W OF LOOP 288 0.46 100% A-23 PA C WOLFE 1140' S OF TOM COLE TO FM 2449 1.38 50% A-24 PA C WOLFE FM 2449 TO H LIVELY 0.63 50% A-25 C CORBIN IH-35-CORBIN TO SPRINGSIDE 0.39 100% A-26 C J CHRISTAL-H LIVELY FM 2449 TO H LIVELY 0.63 100% A-27 C PRECISION JIM CHRISTAL TO 1635' N OF FM 1515 0.45 100% A-28 SA THOMAS J EGAN JIM CHRISTAL TO 2915' S OF JIM CRISTAL 0.55 100% A-29 SA THOMAS J EGAN 1830' N OF FM 1515 TO FM 1515 0.35 50% A-30 PA UNDERWOOD SPRINGSIDE TO UNDERWOOD CONNECTOR 0.76 100% A-31 SA (1/2) WESTCOURT FM 1515 TO SPRINGSIDE 0.79 100% A-32 PA (1/3) WESTERN JIM CHRISTAL TO AIRPORT 1.23 100% A-33 PA WESTERN FM 1515 TO SPRINGSIDE 0.79 100% Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 11 Table 2.B. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area B Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area B-1 C ALLRED BONNIE BRAE TO BRUSH CREEK 0.81 50% B-2 PA ALLRED BRUSH CREEK TO JOHN PAINE 0.30 50% B-3 PA BRUSH CREEK 815' E OF COUNTRY CLUB TO COUNTRY CLUB 0.15 100% B-4 PA BRUSH CREEK COUNTRY CLUB TO 1935' W OF COUNTRY CLUB 0.37 100% B-5 PA BRUSH CREEK 2180' E OF FORT WORTH TO FORT WORTH 0.41 100% B-6 PA BRUSH CREEK FORT WORTH TO 590' E OF ALLRED 0.68 100% B-7 SA CORBIN BONNIE BRAE TO IH-35W 0.66 100% B-8 C CREEKDALE PIMLICO TO RIVERCHASE 0.61 100% B-9 C CREEKDALE THISTLE WAY TO OAKBLUFF 0.39 100% B-10 C EL PASEO BELMONT TO COUNTRY CLUB 0.36 100% B-11 PA FM 1515 BONNIE BRAE TO IH 35W 0.15 100% B-12 PA (1/3) HICKORY CREEK FM 2499 TO NAUTICA 0.22 100% B-13 PA (1/3) HICKORY CREEK NAUTICA TO TEASLEY 0.25 100% B-14 PA (1/3) HICKORY CREEK TEASLEY TO MONTECITO 0.85 100% B-15 PA (1/3) HICKORY CREEK MONTECITO TO 1435' W OF BIDDY BYE 0.42 50% B-16 PA HICKORY CREEK 1435' W OF BIDDY BYE TO 815' E OF COUNTRY CLUB 0.38 100% B-17 SA HOBSON LANE TEASLEY TO MONTECITO 0.13 100% B-18 SA HOBSON LANE MONTECITO TO FORRESTRIDGE 0.28 100% B-19 SA HOBSON LANE FORRESTRIDGE TO COUNTRY CLUB 0.72 100% B-20 C PARVIN MCCORMICK TO HIGHLAND PARK 0.50 100% B-21 SA ROBINSON 230' E OF WHEELER RIDGE TO TEASLEY 0.52 100% B-22 SA RYAN TEASLEY TO MONTECITO 0.76 100% B-23 SA RYAN MONTECITO TO FORRESTRIDGE 0.63 100% B-24 SA RYAN FORRESTRIDGE TO COUNTRY CLUB 0.66 100% B-25 PA (1/3) VINTAGE FORT WORTH TO BONNIE BRAE 0.87 100% B-26 PA (1/3) VINTAGE BONNIE BRAE TO NAPA VALLEY 0.14 100% B-27 PA (1/3) VINTAGE NAPA VALLEY TO IH 35W 0.65 100% B-28 C WILLOWWOOD 1250' W OF HIGHLAND PARK TO BONNIE BRAE 0.24 100% B-29 SA BONNIE BRAE IH 35E TO FM 1515 0.14 100% B-30 SA BONNIE BRAE FM 1515 TO WILLOWWOOD 1.09 100% B-31 SA BONNIE BRAE HIGHLAND PARK TO ROSELAWN 0.48 50% B-32 SA COUNTRY CLUB FORT WORTH TO HOBSON 0.08 100% B-33 SA COUNTRY CLUB HOBSON TO RYAN 1.00 100% B-34 SA COUNTRY CLUB RYAN TO HICKORY CREEK 0.66 50% B-35 PA FORT WORTH COUNTRY CLUB TO VINTAGE 1.32 100% B-36 PA FORT WORTH VINTAGE TO BONNIE BRAE 1.07 100% B-37 PA FORT WORTH BONNIE BRAE TO BRUSH CREEK 0.24 100% B-38 PA FORT WORTH BRUSH CREEK TO CRAWFORD 1.11 100% B-39 Completed JOHN PAINE JOHNSON TO ATHENS 0.42 100% B-40 SA JOHN PAINE VINTAGE TO 1045' S OF VINTAGE 0.20 100% B-41 C PARVIN-ROSELAWN PARVIN TO ROSELAWN 0.52 100% B-42 PA (1/3) TEASLEY IH 35E TO LONDONDERRY 0.25 100% B-43 PA (1/3) TEASLEY LONDONDERRY TO HOBSON 0.97 100% B-44 PA (1/3) TEASLEY LILLIAN B MILLER TO PENNSYLVANIA 0.36 100% B-45 PA (1/3) TEASLEY PENNSYLVANIA TO HOBSON 0.21 100% Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 12 Table 2.C. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area C Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area C-1 PA BARTHOLD MASCH BRANCH TO 5200' W OF IIH 35 0.98 50% C-2 SA BOBCAT FM 2164 TO IH-35 2.75 100% C-3 SA FM 1173 IH 35 TO 4605' W OF IH 35 0.87 100% C-4 SA FM 1173 4605' W OF IH 35 TO LOVERS 0.41 50% C-5 SA FM 2164-IH 35 FM 2164 TO IH 35 2.73 100% C-6 PA GANZER FM 2164 TO GANZER 2.40 100% C-7 PA GANZER 2900' E OF IH 35 TO IH 35 0.55 100% C-8 PA GANZER 1620' E OF BARTHOLD TO BARTHOLD 0.31 50% C-9 PA GANZER BARTHOLD TO RECTOR 0.49 50% A-13,C-10 SA JIM CHRISTAL OLD SH 24 TO WESTERN 0.55 50% A-14,C-11 SA JIM CHRISTAL WESTERN TO MASCH BRANCH 0.66 50% A-15,C-12 SA JIM CHRISTAL MASCH BRANCH TO THOMAS J EGAN 1.13 50% A-16,C-13 SA JIM CHRISTAL THOMAS J EGAN TO 515' E OF C WOLFE 0.75 50% C-14 SA JIM CHRISTAL 945' W OF C WOLFE TO NAIL 0.59 50% C-15 SA JIM CHRISTAL NAIL TO 2045' W of Nail 0.39 50% C-16 C MARSHALL 2845' N OF HAMPTON TO HAMPTON 0.54 100% C-17 C MARSHALL HAMPTON TO US 380 0.59 100% C-18 SA MASCH BRANCH MASCH BRANCH TO DARBY SMITH 0.65 100% C-19 C WESTWARD NORTHWAY TO BONNIE BRAE 0.22 100% C-20 SA (1/2) RINEY US 77 TO 2460' W OF US 77 0.47 100% C-21 SA (1/2) RINEY 2460' W OF US 77 TO BONNIE BRAE 0.19 100% C-22 PA (1/3) US 77 WINDSOR TO FM 2164 0.22 100% C-23 PA (1/3) US 77 RINEY TO WINDSOR 0.46 100% C-24 PA (1/3) US 77 RINEY TO RINEY 0.40 100% C-25 PA (1/3) US 77 BONNIE BRAE TO RINEY 0.75 100% C-26 PA (1/3) US 77 LOOP 288 TO BONNIE BRAE 0.33 100% C-27 PA (1/3) US 77 IH 35 TO LOOP 288 0.87 100% C-28 C MASCH BRANCH-NAIL MASCH BRANCH TO 1295' W OF MASCH BRANCH 0.25 100% C-29 C MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 1050' E OF LOOP 288 TO 1550' W OF LOOP 288 0.49 100% C-30 C MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 1335' W OF THOMAS J EGAN TO 775' E OF C WOLFE 0.48 100% C-31 C MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 775' E OF C WOLFE TO 690' W OF C WOLFE 0.28 50% C-32 C MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 690' W OF C WOLFE TO NAIL 0.58 100% C-33 SA WESTGATE WESTGATE TO 1460' E OF IH-35 0.18 100% C-34 SA WINDSOR US 77 TO HINKLE 0.46 100% C-35 SA (1/2) WINDSOR HINKLE TO BONNIE BRAE 0.99 100% C-36 SA (1/2) WINDSOR WESTGATE TO 145' W OF CLARENDON 0.10 100% C-37 SA (1/2) WINDSOR 220' W OF WINDSOR FARMS TO IH 35 0.17 100% C-38 SA WINDSOR IH 35 TO MASCH BRANCH 1.24 100% C-39 SA BARTHOLD GANZER TO 2600' S OF GANZER 0.49 100% C-40 PA BONNIE BRAE MILAM TO LOOP 288 3.13 100% C-41 SA BONNIE BRAE LOOP 288 TO US 77 0.24 100% C-42 SA BONNIE BRAE US 77 TO RINEY 0.38 100% C-43 SA BONNIE BRAE RINEY TO WINDSOR 0.66 100% C-44 SA BONNIE BRAE WINDSOR TO US 380 0.68 100% C-45,E-29 SA BONNIE BRAE US 380 TO PANHANDLE 0.55 50% C-46,E-30 SA BONNIE BRAE PANHANDLE TO SCRIPTURE 0.20 50% C-47,E-31 SA BONNIE BRAE SCRIPTURE TO OAK 0.22 50% C-48,E-32 SA BONNIE BRAE OAK TO HICKORY 0.07 50% C-49,E-33 SA BONNIE BRAE HICKORY TO PRAIRIE 0.27 50% C-50,E-34 SA BONNIE BRAE PRAIRIE TO IH 35E 0.16 50% C-51 PA C WOLFE US 380 TO WESTERN-NAIL 0.51 100% C-52 C FALLMEADOW MEADOWLEDGE TO GARDENVIEW 0.17 100% C-53,D-22 PA FM 2164 MILAM TO LOOP 288 2.62 50% C-54,D-28 SA LOCUST LOOP 288 TO HERCULES 0.43 50% C-55,D-29 SA LOCUST HERCULES TO BELL 0.45 50% C-56,D-30 SA LOCUST BELL TO WINDSOR 0.24 50% C-57,D-31 SA LOCUST WINDSOR TO FM 2164 0.25 50% C-58 SA LOVERS FM 1173 TO MASCH BRANCH 0.78 100% C-59 SA LOVERS 1085' N OF MASCH BRANCH TO MASCH BRANCH 0.21 100% C-60 SA LOVERS LN CONNECTOR LOVERS TO LOOP 288 0.06 100% C-61 SA LOVERS LN CONNECTOR LOOP 288 TO 1085' N OF MASCH BRANCH 0.08 100% C-62 SA MASCH BRANCH 1295' S OF FM 1173 TO JACKSON 0.79 50% C-63 SA MASCH BRANCH LOVERS TO US 380 0.72 100% C-64 SA MASCH BRANCH US 380 TO JIM CHRISTAL 0.78 100% C-65 SA MILAM-LOOP 288 MILAM TO LOOP 288 2.71 100% C-66 SA MILAM-US 77 MILAM TO GANZER 1.51 100% C-67 SA MILAM-US 77 GANZER TO LONG 0.73 100% C-68 SA MILAM-US 77 LONG TO US 77 0.53 100% C-69 C NICOSIA LOOP 288 TO BEALL 0.12 100% C-70 SA THOMAS J EGAN US 380 TO JIM CHRISTAL 0.76 100% C-71 PA WESTERN US 380 TO JIM CHRISTAL 0.80 100% Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 13 Table 2.D. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area D Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area D-1 SA BOBCAT 560' W OF FM 2164 TO FM 2164 0.11 50% D-2 C FISHTRAP MINGO TO GEESLING 0.36 50% D-3 PA GANZER 15,500' E OF SHERMAN TO 4600' W OF SHERMAN 3.41 100% D-4 SA GRIBBLE SPRINGS INDIAN WELLS TO 3015' W OF INDIAN WELLS 0.57 50% D-5 SA HARTLEE FIELD 4220' E OF COOPER CREEK TO COOPER CREEK 0.80 50% D-6 SA HARTLEE FIELD COOPER CREEK TO 5170' W OF COOPER CREEK 0.98 50% D-7 C HARTLEE FIELD 600' E OF SHERMAN TO SHERMAN 0.11 50% D-8 SA HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 HARTLEE FIELD TO SHERMAN 0.43 100% D-9 SA HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 SHERMAN TO 3500' W OF SHERMAN 0.66 100% D-10 SA HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 STUART TO 1485' W OF STUART 0.28 50% D-11 SA HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 475' W OF FM 2164 TO FM 2164 0.09 100% D-12 C LONG 510' W OF FM 2164 TO FM 2164 0.10 100% D-13 SA MINGO E CITY LIMITS TO COOPER CREEK 0.09 100% D-14 SA MINGO COOPER CREEK TO LOOP 288 0.44 100% D-15 SA MINGO LOOP 288 TO US 380 0.43 100% D-16 C KINGS ROW SILVER DOME TO LOOP 288 0.50 100% D-17 C SILVER DOME COOPER CREEK TO FARRIS RD 0.41 50% D-18 C COLLINS HARTLEE FIELD TO 2730' S OF HARTLEE FIELD 0.84 50% D-19 SA COOPER CREEK SHERMAN TO HARTLEE FIELD 1.91 100% D-20 SA COOPER CREEK SILVER DOME TO MINGO 0.83 50% D-21 PA COOPER CREEK MINGO TO US 380 0.32 100% C-53,D-22 PA FM 2164 MILAM TO LOOP 288 2.62 50% D-23 PA GREEN VALLEY 2395' S OF FM 2153 TO 2935' N OF SHEPARD 1.47 100% D-24 SA GREEN VALLEY WARSCHUN TO SHERMAN 0.40 100% D-25 SA INDIAN WELLS 1615' S OF FM 2153 TO 4930' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS 0.73 100% D-26 SA INDIAN WELLS 4930' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS TO 2905' N OF GRIBBLE 0.38 50% D-27 SA INDIAN WELLS 2905' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS TO GRIBBLE SPRINGS 0.55 50% C-54,D-28 SA LOCUST LOOP 288 TO HERCULES 0.43 50% C-55,D-29 SA LOCUST HERCULES TO BELL 0.45 50% C-56,D-30 SA LOCUST BELL TO WINDSOR 0.24 50% C-57,D-31 SA LOCUST WINDSOR TO FM 2164 0.25 50% D-32 SA SHERMAN LOOP 288 TO HERCULES 0.31 100% D-33 SA SHERMAN HERCULES TO KINGS 0.36 100% D-34 SA SHERMAN KINGS TO WINDSOR 0.38 100% D-35 SA SHERMAN WINDSOR TO WILSONWOOD 0.19 100% D-36 SA SHERMAN WILSONWOOD TO CORONADO 0.22 100% D-37 SA SHERMAN CORONADO TO GREENWOOD 0.31 100% D-38 SA SHERMAN GREENWOOD TO BELL 0.16 100% D-39 SA SHERMAN BELL TO LOCUST 0.32 100% D-40 C WINDSOR LOOP 288 TO DOMINION 0.16 100% Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 14 Table 2.E. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area E Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area E-1 C AUDRA LOOP 288 TO 1185' W OF LOOP 288 0.22 100% E-2 SA BLAGG LAKEVIEW TO GEESLING 0.71 100% E-3 SA BLAGG GEESLING TO 2175' W OF GEESLING 0.41 100% E-4 SA BLAGG 235' E OF MAYHILL TO MAYHILL 0.04 50% E-5 PA (1/3) DALLAS TEASLEY TO IH 35E 0.87 100% E-6 C DUCHESS TRAILHEAD TO WOODROW 0.76 100% E-7 SA FM 426 LANEY TO GRISSOM 0.57 100% E-8 Completed MCKINNEY GRISSOM TO LOOP 288 1.65 100% E-9 SA MCKINNEY LOOP 288 TO CARDINAL 0.13 100% E-10 SA MCKINNEY CARDINAL TO MOCKINGBIRD 0.22 100% E-11 SA MCKINNEY MOCKINGBIRD TO MACK 0.61 100% E-12 SA MCKINNEY MACK TO AUDRA 0.29 100% E-13 SA MILLS TRINITY TO MAYHILL 1.40 100% E-14 SA MILLS LAKEVIEW TO MAYHILL 0.41 100% E-15 SA MINGO US 380 TO OLD NORTH 0.14 100% E-16 SA MINGO OLD NORTH TO NOTTINGHAM 0.48 100% E-17 SA MINGO NOTTINGHAM TO PERTAIN 0.56 100% E-18 SA MINGO PERTAIN TO RUDDELL 0.18 100% E-19 SA MINGO RUDDELL TO WILLIS 0.11 100% E-20 SA MINGO WILLIS TO WITHERS 0.44 100% E-21 SA MINGO WITHERS TO PAISLEY 0.04 100% E-22 SA MINGO PAISLEY TO BELL 0.19 100% E-23 SA (1/2) MORSE MAYHILL TO KIMBERLY 0.22 100% E-24 SA SHADY OAKS WOODROW TO TEASLEY 0.58 100% E-25 SA SPENCER MAYHILL TO LOOP 288 0.44 100% E-26 C TREATMENT PLANT MCKINNEY TO POST OAK 0.63 100% E-27 SA TREATMENT PLANT POST OAK TO 1325' W OF POST OAK 0.25 100% E-28 SA TREATMENT PLANT 1325' W OF POST OAK TO MAYHILL 0.75 100% C-45,E-29 SA BONNIE BRAE US 380 TO PANHANDLE 0.55 50% C-46,E-30 SA BONNIE BRAE PANHANDLE TO SCRIPTURE 0.20 50% C-47,E-31 SA BONNIE BRAE SCRIPTURE TO OAK 0.22 50% C-48,E-32 SA BONNIE BRAE OAK TO HICKORY 0.07 50% C-49,E-33 SA BONNIE BRAE HICKORY TO PRAIRIE 0.27 50% C-50,E-34 SA BONNIE BRAE PRAIRIE TO IH 35E 0.16 50% E-35 C CARDINAL ORIOLE TO MCKINNEY 0.42 100% E-36 PA GEESLING US 380 TO BLAGG 0.46 100% E-37 PA GEESLING US 380 TO BLAGG 1.02 100% E-38 PA (1/3) LAKEVIEW POST OAK TO SHADY SHORES 0.26 100% E-39 PA (1/3) MAYHILL US 380 TO PROMINENCE 0.44 100% E-40 PA (1/3) MAYHILL PROMINENCE TO 770' N OF RUSSELL NEWMAN 0.39 100% E-41 PA (1/3) MAYHILL 770' N OF RUSSELL NEWMAN TO RUSSELL NEWMAN 0.15 50% E-42 PA (1/3) MAYHILL RUSSELL NEWMAN TO 460' S OF RUSSELL NEWMAN 0.09 50% E-43 PA (1/3) MAYHILL 460' S OF RUSSELL NEWMAN TO MILLS 0.20 100% E-44 PA (1/3) MAYHILL MILLS TO MCKINNEY 0.37 100% E-45 PA (1/3) MAYHILL MCKINNEY TO MORSE 0.39 100% E-46 PA (1/3) MAYHILL MORSE TO SPENCER 0.67 100% E-47 PA (1/3) MAYHILL SPENCER TO EDWARDS 0.60 100% E-48 PA (1/3) MAYHILL 2725' N OF COLORADO TO COLORADO 0.52 100% E-49 PA (1/3) MAYHILL COLORADO TO IH 35E 0.44 100% E-50 PA MAYHILL CONNECTOR MAYHILL TO QUAILCREEK 0.13 100% E-51 C MOCKINGBIRD MCKINNEY TO 625' N OF DUCHESS 0.16 100% E-52 SA MOCKINGBIRD DUCHESS TO SHADY OAKS 0.41 100% E-53 SA MOCKINGBIRD SHADY OAKS TO SPENCER 0.53 100% E-54 PA POST OAK MILLS TO SPENCER 1.30 100% E-55 PA POST OAK TREATMENT PLANT TO EDWARDS 1.27 100% E-56 PA POST OAK EDWARDS TO POCKRUS PAGE 0.51 100% E-57 C SWISHER EDWARDS TO POCKRUS PAGE 0.50 100% E-58 PA (1/3) TEASLEY DALLAS TO IH 35E 0.35 100% E-59 C N STAR SPENCER TO ROY 0.32 100% E-60 C ROY MAYHILL TO N STAR 0.21 100% Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order. H LIVELYWELCHNORTHTEXASBEBERNARDOAKLOCUSTACMEEAGLEJIMCHRISTALCARRAVEAFULTONFM1515HICKORYC WOLFESAMBASSBONNIEBRAECOLLINSEPANHANDLEFM 156MCCORMICK SCRIPTUREFM 2449GHICKORY HILLCENTPFORT WORTHFM 156JOHNPAINECOUNTRYCLUBCORBINBRUSHCREEKFM1515THOMAS J EGANALLREDFM 1830RYANH LIVELYFORTWORTHWESTERN FINCHERAMYXROSELAWNROBSON RANCHHUNTERARTERIALFM 1515-HLIVELYUNDERWOODHUNTER COLLECTOR AIH 35WC-48B-32A-6B-39B-29B-11B-26B-3C-50A-21C-46A-4C-47B-37B-28A-2C-49A-5B-2A-29A-20B-10B-4B-16A-28C-15A-25BA-9B-5A-27A-22B-31 C-29B-20B-41A-13A-1A-12 C-14A-26A-24A-17B-27A-7B-24B-34B-7A-14B-6A-8B-19A-10A-16A-30C-70 C-64A-31A-3371 B-1A-11B-25B-33B-36B-30B-38A-3A-15A-32B-35A-19A-23A-18E-32E-34E-30E-31E-33C-10C-11C-13C-12B-40LegendNewWideningOther ThoroughfaresOther Thoroughfares (Future)FEMA FloodwayETJNAAAExhibit 3.A - Service Area A CIP2022 Roadway Impact Fee Eligibility00.51Miles¯ H LIVELYWELCHNORTHTEXASBELLBERNARDOAKLOCUACMEEAGLEAVEARUDDELL FFM1515DALLASBRINKERPOSTOAKHICKORYMEDPARKLOOP 288MORSECOLO RADO SAMBASSBONNIEBRAECOLLINSEL PASEOPRAIRIESOUT H RI D G E MCCORMICK SCRIPTURESANJACINTOMCKINNEYRIVERPASSHICKORY HILLCENTREPLACECREEKDALEDUNCAN EDWARDSMONTECITO FORT WORTHJOHNPAINECOUNTRYCLUBCORBINBRUSHCREEKTREATMENTPLANTRYANALLREDHICKORYCREEKFM 1830RYANSPENCERLING POCKRUSPAGEFM 2499 MONTECITOFORTWORTHWIND RIVERWESTERN FINCHERAMYXPOST OAKSHADY OAKSMILLSROSELAWNFM 426HUNTERARTERIALOLD ALTONUNDERWOODIH 35WIH 35EC-48B-32A-6B-17E-9B-39E-50B-29B-11B-26B-3E-51C-50A-21E-2C-46E-4B-45E-23E-10B-12A-4C-47B-37B-28B-13B-42E-27E-38A-2C-49B-18E-12A-5B-2A-29A-20B-44E-58B-10B-4E-44B-16A-28E-45A-25B-9E-52B-5E-14B-15E-25E-49E-8A-27A-22B-31 E-57B-20E-56E-48B-41B-21E-53A-13A-1E-24A-12 E-47B-8E-11B-23E-26A-17B-27A-7B-24B-34B-7A-14E-46B-6B-19E-28E-6A-30B-22A-31A-33B-1A-11B-14B-25E-5B-43B-33B-36B-30B-38A-3A-15A-32E-55E-54B-35E-13A-18E-7E-32E-34E-3E-31E-33E-59E-60B-40LegendNewWideningOther ThoroughfaresOther Thoroughfares (Future)FEMA FloodwayETJNAABExhibit 3.B - Service Area B CIP2022 Roadway Impact Fee Eligibility00.51Miles¯ MASCH BRANCH-NAILAUDRAWELCHNORTHTEXASBELLBERNARDOAKLOCUSTELMLONGEAGLEJIMCHRISTALCARROLLMILAMBOBCATAVEALOOP 288RUDDELLWINDSOR FULTONHERCULESFM1515GLENWOODPAISLEYDALLASRECTO R DUNES HICKORYMASCH BRANCHOOP 288MORSESTUARTC WOLFEOLDNORTHSHERMBELL COLLINSPRAIRIEPANHANDLEM 156M SCRIPTURENAILUS 380MCKINNEYHARTLEEFLD-FM2164MALONEBARTHOLDENTRELACEEMERSONMILAM-US77DUNCAN NICOSIALATTIMOREKINGSBONNIE BRAEFM1515THUNDERBIRDTHOMAS J EGANLOVERSWESTGATEHINKLEFM1173US77SPENCGANZERWESTERN SHADY OAKSGA NZERFM 2164MILAM-LOOP 288FM 2164-IH 35FM 156BONNIE B R A E IH 35E-21C-60C-48C-61D-11C-36D-12D-1D-7E-19A-6C-69EB-29E-15B-11D-38E-51D-40C-50C-37C-52 E-18C-33C-21E-22D-35C-46C-59E-10D-36C-22A-4C-47C-41C-56C-57C-49C-31D-10E-12A-5C-8D-37D-32D-39C-26A-29D-33C-42A-28D-34C-15C-24E-52C-4E-35D-8C-54D-15E-20C-55A-27C-34C-23A-22C-20E-16C-30C-9C-29C-39C-51C-68E-53C-67A-13C-45E-17C-19E-24C-32A -12 C-14E-11A-17A-7C-18D-9A-14C-43C-44A-8C-63C-66A-16C-25E-6C-70 C-64C-58C-623C-71 C-3C-27C-1C-35B-30A-3A-15A-32C-38C-28CC-6C-53C-65C-5C-2C-40E-32E-34E-30E-31D-30D-31E-33D-28D-29C-10E-29C-11C-13C-12D-22C-16 C-17D-1LegendNewWideningOther ThoroughfaresOther Thoroughfares (Future)FEMA FloodwayETJNAACExhibit 3.C - Service Area C CIP2022 Roadway Impact Fee Eligibility00.51Miles¯ BLAGG GRIBBLE SPRINGS AUDRA WELCHBELLBERNARDOAK LOCUSTFM 2164ELMLONG ACME EAGLECARROLLT RUDDELLWIN DSOR FULTONHERCULES GLENWOODPAISLEY D A L L A S RDUNESRY LOOP 288MORSE FISHTRAP SHEPARD COSTUARTOLDNORTHAMSSINDIANWELLSSHERMANBELLCOLLINS PRAIRIE GANZER SMCCORMIC SAN JACI NT O MCKINNEY HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 FM 2153CENTREPLACEEMERSON DUNCANGREEN VALLEYLATTIMORE KINGS MILAM TREATMENT PLANT HARTLEE FIELD COOPER CREEKM INGO SPEN C E R GEESLING LOO P 288- U S 380 GANZER POST OAKSHADY OAKS MILLS FM 2153 FM 426COOPERCREEKFM 2164MILAM-LOOP 288164-IH 35AE FM 2153-FM 2164 E-4 E-21D-1 3 E-42D-11 D-12 D-1 D-7 E-19 E-9 E-15 E-41D -38E-51D-40C-52E-18E-22D-35E-43E-23 E-10D-36E-1 C-22 C-56D-17 E-27C-57D-18D-10 E-12D-37D-32D-21D-39 E-58D-2D-33E-44D-26D-34E-40E-4524 E-52E-3 E-14E-35D-8 C-54D-15 D -14 D-24E -20 E-25 E-39E-8C-55C-34 C-2 3 E-36E-1 6 E-53D-27E -1 7 D-4 E-24 E-11 E-26 D-9 E-46D-5 E-2D-25E-28 E-6 D-20E- 5 D-3 D-6 E-37E-54E-13D-23E- 7D-19C-53C-65C-5 D-30D-31D-28D-29D-22D-16 E-59Legend New Widening Other Thoroughfares Other Thoroughfares (Future) FEMA Floodway ETJ NAA D Exhibit 3.D - Service Area D CIP 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Eligibility 00.51Miles ¯ BLAGGAUDRAWELCHNORTHTEXASBELLBERNARDOAKLOCUSTELMACMEEAGLECARROLLAVEARUDDELL FULTON5GLENWOOPAISLEYDALLASBRINKERPOSTOAKHICKORYMEDPARKLOOP 288MORSEFISHTRAPCOLO R A D O OLDNORTSAMBASSBONNIEBRAEL COLLINSEL PASEOPRAIRIEPANHANDLESOUT H RI D G E MCCORMICK SCRIPTURESANJACINTO380MCKINNEYMALONEVERPASSCENTREPLACECREEKDALEDUNCAN EDWARDSLATTIMOREMONTECITO FORT WORTHCOUNTRYCLUBINBONNIE BBRUSHCREEKBIRDTREATMENTPLANTRYANHICKORYCREEKHINKLERYANSPENCERGEESLING POCKRUSPAGEWIND RIVEROOP288-US380POST OAKSHADY OAKSMILLSROSELAWNFM 426IH 35EE-4E-21C-48B-32E-42E-19B-17E-9E-50B-29E-15B-11E-41B3D-38E-51C-50E-18E-22C-46E-43B-45E-23E-10DE-1C-22B12C-47B-37B-28B-13B-42E-27E-38C-49B-18E-12D-37D-21 D-39B-44E-58D-2B-10B4E-44B16E-40E-45B-9E-52E-3B5E-14E-35B-15D-15D-14E-20E-25E-49E-39E-8C-34E-36E-16B-31 E-57B-20E-56E-48B-41B-21E-53C-45E-17C-19E-24E-47B-8E-11B-23E-26B-24B-34B-7E-46C-44E-2B-19E-28E-6B-22B-1B-14B-25E-5B-43C-35B-33E-37 B-36B-30E-55E-54B-35E-13E-7E-32E-34E-30E-31E-33E-29E-59E-60LegendNewWideningOther ThoroughfaresOther Thoroughfares (Future)FEMA FloodwayETJNAAEExhibit 3.E - Service Area E CIP2022 Roadway Impact Fee Eligibility00.51Miles¯ 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 20 IV. COMPUTATION METHOD FOR ROADWAY IMPACT FEES A. Service Areas The five (5) service areas used in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study are shown in Exhibit 1. These service areas cover the entire corporate area of the City of Denton. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that “the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles.” B. Service Units The “service unit” is a measure of consumption or use of the capital facilities by new development. In other words, it is the unit of measure used in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study to quantify the supply and demand for roads in the City. For transportation purposes, the service unit is defined as a vehicle-mile. Below is the definition for vehicle-mile. Vehicle-Mile: The capacity consumed in a single lane in the PM peak hour by a vehicle making a trip one mile in length. The PM Peak is used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused by new development. Total Vehicle-Miles of Supply: Based on the total length (miles), number of lanes, and capacity (vehicles per hour) provided by the Denton Mobility Plan (see Appendix B). Total Vehicle-Miles of Demand: Based on the 10-year growth projections (Pg. 35). The demand is equal to PM Trip Rate (trips) * Trip Length (miles). The capacity values used in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study are based upon Thoroughfare Capacity Criteria published by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) and applied to City of Denton thoroughfare standards. Tables 3A and 3B show the service volumes as a function of the facility classification and type. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 21 Table 3A. Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities (used in Appendix B – Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Supply) Facility Classification Median Configuration Hourly Vehicle-Mile Capacity per Lane-Mile of Roadway Facility Primary Arterial (PA) Divided 850 Secondary Arterial (SA) Divided 750 Collector (C) Undivided 550 Table 3B. Service Volumes for Existing Facilities (used in Appendix C – Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory) Roadway Type Description Hourly Vehicle-Mile Capacity per Lane-Mile of Roadway Facility 2U-R Rural Cross-Section (i.e., gravel, dirt, etc.) 150 2U-H Two lane undivided – Arterial Type 725 2-1W Two lane – one way couplet 650 2U Two lane undivided 425 3-1W Three lane - one way couplet 700 3U Three lane undivided (two-way, left-turn lane) 550 4U Four lane undivided 550 4D Four lane divided 750 6D Six lane divided 850 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 22 C. Cost Per Service Unit A fundamental step in the impact fee process is to establish the cost for each service unit. In the case of the Roadway Impact Fee, this is the cost for each vehicle-mile of travel. Thus, it is the cost to construct a roadway (lane-mile) needed to accommodate a vehicle-mile of travel. The cost per service unit is calculated for each service area based on the roadway projects within that service area. The second component of the cost per service unit is the determination of the number of service units in each service area. This number is the measure of the growth in transportation demand that is projected to occur in the ten-year period. D. Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costing Methodology All of the project costs for an arterial or collector facility which serves the overall transportation system are eligible to be included in the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that the allowable costs are “…including and limited to the: 1. Construction contract price; 2. Surveying and engineering fees; 3. Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney’s fees, and expert witness fees; and 4. Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision.” The engineer’s opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP is based, in part, on the calculation of a unit cost of construction. This means that a cost per linear foot of roadway is calculated based on an average price for the various components of roadway construction. This allows the probable cost to be determined by the type of facility being constructed, the number of lanes, and the length of the project. The cost for location specific items such as bridges, highway ramps, drainage structures, and any other 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 23 special components are added to each project, as appropriate. The detailed costing components are provided in the costing sheets in Appendix A. The following is a detailed description of the costing methodology for the Roadway Impact Fee CIP. 1. Project Information In order to correctly estimate the cost of a roadway project, several attributes are first identified: x Project Number – Identifies which Service Area the project is in with a corresponding number. The corresponding number does not represent any prioritizations and is used only to identify projects. For example, Project A-10 is in Service Area A and is the 10th project on the list. x Roadway Name – A unique identifier for each project. In some cases abbreviations are used for the project name. In cases where roadway names are unknown the connecting limits may be used such as FM 1515 – H Lively represents a roadway link that connects FM 1515 to H Lively. x Limits – Represents the beginning and ending location for each project. x Length (ft) – The distance measured in feet that is used to cost out the project. x Roadway Classification – The costing class to be used in the analysis. The impact fee class provides the width for the various elements in the roadway. The construction costs are variable, based on the proposed Mobility Plan classification of the roadway. For example, PA stands for Primary Arterial. A PA Impact Fee Class means the entire roadway is to be constructed. Additional classifications are utilized in cases where a portion of the facility currently exists and the road is only to be widened. The following notations are used for these projects: o “(1/2)” for facilities where half the facility still needs to be constructed; o “(1/3)” for future six-lane principal arterials facilities where two additional median lanes are needed o “(2/3)” for future six-lane principal arterials facilities where four additional lanes are needed 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 24 2. Construction Cost A typical roadway project consists of a number of costs, including the following: planning, survey, design engineering, permitting, right-of way acquisition, and construction and inspection. While the construction cost component of a project may actually consist of approximately 100 various pay items, a simplified approach was used for developing the conceptual level project costs. The pay items used to estimate construction costs are shown in Table 4. Table 4. Construction Cost Pay Items Pay Items x Unclassified Street Earthwork x Lime Stabilization x Concrete pavement and curb x Sidewalk (and Trail when applicable) x Topsoil x Block Sodding x Turn lanes 3. Allowances A percentage of the paving construction cost is allotted for various major construction component allowances, as appropriate. These allowances include mobilization, traffic control, pavement markings and signage, roadway drainage, illumination, minor water and sewer adjustments, landscaping, irrigation and SWPPP. These allowance percentages are also based on historical data and are shown in the example project costing sheets in the Appendix. In addition, allowances are provided for streams and channel crossings, railroad crossings, and intersection improvements where needs are anticipated. The construction cost subtotal is given a fifteen percent (15%) allowance for contingency and ROW costs, sixteen percent (16%) for engineering, surveying, and SUE, and three and a half percent (3.5%) of the construction cost total is added for inspection and materials testing. In addition, if City funds 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 25 were previously spent or are currently allocated to a project, those amounts are also included in the total cost. The Impact Fee Project Cost Total is then the Construction Cost Total plus engineering, surveying, testing, and inspection; plus ROW/contingency. E. Summary of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costs Tables 5.A – 5.E are the 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP project lists for each service area with planning level project costs. Overall project costs can be seen in the summary tables in Appendix A, Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections. These costs are based on the example project costing sheets, also provided in Appendix A. It should be noted that these tables reflect only conceptual-level opinions or assumptions regarding the portions of future project costs that are recoverable through impact fees. Actual project costs are likely to change with time and are dependent on market and economic conditions that cannot be predicted. The Roadway Impact Fee CIP establishes the list of projects for which Impact Fees may be utilized. Projects not included in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP are not eligible to receive impact fee funding. The cost projections utilized in this study should not be utilized for the City’s construction CIP. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 26 Table 5.A – 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area A Service Area Proj. # Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area A-1 SA CORBIN IH-35W TO CORBIN 0.58 100% 10,164,000$ 10,164,000$ A-2 SA CORBIN 500' S OF SPRINGSIDE TO CORBIN 0.27 100% 3,378,000$ 3,378,000$ A-3 PA FM 1515 IH 35W TO CORBIN 1.13 100% 23,533,000$ 23,533,000$ A-4 PA FM 1515 CORBIN TO WESTERN 0.22 100% 3,959,000$ 3,959,000$ A-5 PA FM 1515 WESTERN TO WESTCOURT 0.29 100% 7,495,000$ 7,495,000$ A-6 PA FM 1515 WESTCOURT TO MASCH BRANCH 0.12 100% 2,089,000$ 2,089,000$ A-7 PA FM 1515 TOM COLE TO 3435' W OF TOM COLE 0.65 100% 13,827,000$ 13,827,000$ A-8 PA FM 1515 3435' W OF TOM COLE TO 530' E OF C WOLFE 0.71 100% 13,132,000$ 13,132,000$ A-9 PA H LIVELY C WOLFE TO 2145' W OF H LIVELY 0.41 50% 7,226,000$ 3,613,000$ A-10 PA H LIVELY 2145' W OF H LIVELY TO 2150' W OF ED ROBSON 0.74 100% 13,188,000$ 13,188,000$ A-11 C IH-35-CORBIN IH-35 TO CORBIN 0.84 100% 7,040,000$ 7,040,000$ A-12 SA JIM CHRISTAL IH 35 TO OLD SH 24 0.59 100% 10,332,000$ 10,332,000$ A-13,C-10 SA JIM CHRISTAL OLD SH 24 TO WESTERN 0.55 50% 9,746,000$ 4,873,000$ A-14,C-11 SA JIM CHRISTAL WESTERN TO MASCH BRANCH 0.66 50% 11,964,000$ 5,982,000$ A-15,C-12 SA JIM CHRISTAL MASCH BRANCH TO THOMAS J EGAN 1.13 50% 18,502,000$ 9,251,000$ A-16,C-13 SA JIM CHRISTAL THOMAS J EGAN TO 515' E OF C WOLFE 0.75 50%12,707,000$ 6,353,500$ A-17 C PRECISION-WESTERN PRECISION TO WESTERN 0.65 100% 6,566,000$ 6,566,000$ A-18 PA ROBSON RANCH IH 35W TO ED ROBSON 1.65 50%30,974,000$ 15,487,000$ A-19 PA ROBSON RANCH ED ROBSON TO YARBROUGH 1.35 50% 25,335,000$ 12,667,500$ A-20 SA SPRINGSIDE CORBIN TO UNDERWOOD 0.35 100% 6,141,000$ 6,141,000$ A-21 SA SPRINGSIDE UNDERWOOD TO WESTCOURT 0.16 100% 2,971,000$ 2,971,000$ A-22 C TJ EGAN-LOOP 288 LOOP 288 TO 2440' W OF LOOP 288 0.46 100% 3,722,000$ 3,722,000$ A-23 PA C WOLFE 1140' S OF TOM COLE TO FM 2449 1.38 50% 26,240,000$ 13,120,000$ A-24 PA C WOLFE FM 2449 TO H LIVELY 0.63 50% 12,018,000$ 6,009,000$ A-25 C CORBIN IH-35-CORBIN TO SPRINGSIDE 0.39 100% 3,667,000$ 3,667,000$ A-26 C J CHRISTAL-H LIVELY FM 2449 TO H LIVELY 0.63 100% 5,353,000$ 5,353,000$ A-27 C PRECISION JIM CHRISTAL TO 1635' N OF FM 1515 0.45 100% 3,694,000$ 3,694,000$ A-28 SA THOMAS J EGAN JIM CHRISTAL TO 2915' S OF JIM CRISTAL 0.55 100% 6,984,000$ 6,984,000$ A-29 SA THOMAS J EGAN 1830' N OF FM 1515 TO FM 1515 0.35 50% 4,635,000$ 2,317,500$ A-30 PA UNDERWOOD SPRINGSIDE TO UNDERWOOD CONNECTOR 0.76 100% 15,229,000$ 15,229,000$ A-31 SA (1/2) WESTCOURT FM 1515 TO SPRINGSIDE 0.79 100% 5,343,000$ 5,343,000$ A-32 PA (1/3) WESTERN JIM CHRISTAL TO AIRPORT 1.23 100% 6,619,000$ 6,619,000$ A-33 PA WESTERN FM 1515 TO SPRINGSIDE 0.79 100% 14,102,000$ 14,102,000$ 268,201,500$ 37,660$ 268,239,160$ Total Cost in SERVICE AREA ASA AService Area Project Cost Subtotal 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area a. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Denton. b. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 27 Table 5.B – 10-Year 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area B Service Area Proj. # Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area B-1 C ALLRED BONNIE BRAE TO BRUSH CREEK 0.81 50% 6,097,000$ 3,048,500$ B-2 PA ALLRED BRUSH CREEK TO JOHN PAINE 0.30 50% 5,424,000$ 2,712,000$ B-3 PA BRUSH CREEK 815' E OF COUNTRY CLUB TO COUNTRY CLUB 0.15 100% 2,747,000$ 2,747,000$ B-4 PA BRUSH CREEK COUNTRY CLUB TO 1935' W OF COUNTRY CLUB 0.37 100% 6,769,000$ 6,769,000$ B-5 PA BRUSH CREEK 2180' E OF FORT WORTH TO FORT WORTH 0.41 100% 7,344,000$ 7,344,000$ B-6 PA BRUSH CREEK FORT WORTH TO 590' E OF ALLRED 0.68 100% 10,698,000$ 10,698,000$ B-7 SA CORBIN BONNIE BRAE TO IH-35W 0.66 100% 10,760,000$ 10,760,000$ B-8 C CREEKDALE PIMLICO TO RIVERCHASE 0.61 100% 5,346,000$ 5,346,000$ B-9 C CREEKDALE THISTLE WAY TO OAKBLUFF 0.39 100% 3,461,000$ 3,461,000$ B-10 C EL PASEO BELMONT TO COUNTRY CLUB 0.36 100% 3,369,000$ 3,369,000$ B-11 PA FM 1515 BONNIE BRAE TO IH 35W 0.15 100% 2,595,000$ 2,595,000$ B-12 PA (1/3) HICKORY CREEK FM 2499 TO NAUTICA 0.22 100% 1,605,000$ 1,605,000$ B-13 PA (1/3) HICKORY CREEK NAUTICA TO TEASLEY 0.25 100% 1,789,000$ 1,789,000$ B-14 PA (1/3) HICKORY CREEK TEASLEY TO MONTECITO 0.85 100% 8,638,000$ 8,638,000$ B-15 PA (1/3) HICKORY CREEK MONTECITO TO 1435' W OF BIDDY BYE 0.42 50% 4,006,000$ 2,003,000$ B-16 PA HICKORY CREEK 1435' W OF BIDDY BYE TO 815' E OF COUNTRY CLUB 0.38 100% 7,612,000$ 7,612,000$ B-17 SA HOBSON LANE TEASLEY TO MONTECITO 0.13 100% 1,914,000$ 1,914,000$ B-18 SA HOBSON LANE MONTECITO TO FORRESTRIDGE 0.28 100% 5,710,000$ 5,710,000$ B-19 SA HOBSON LANE FORRESTRIDGE TO COUNTRY CLUB 0.72 100% 11,559,000$ 11,559,000$ B-20 C PARVIN MCCORMICK TO HIGHLAND PARK 0.50 100% 2,150,000$ 2,150,000$ B-21 SA ROBINSON 230' E OF WHEELER RIDGE TO TEASLEY 0.52 100% 8,061,000$ 8,061,000$ B-22 SA RYAN TEASLEY TO MONTECITO 0.76 100% 11,980,000$ 11,980,000$ B-23 SA RYAN MONTECITO TO FORRESTRIDGE 0.63 100% 10,878,000$ 10,878,000$ B-24 SA RYAN FORRESTRIDGE TO COUNTRY CLUB 0.66 100% 10,824,000$ 10,824,000$ B-25 PA (1/3) VINTAGE FORT WORTH TO BONNIE BRAE 0.87 100% 11,721,000$ 11,721,000$ B-26 PA (1/3) VINTAGE BONNIE BRAE TO NAPA VALLEY 0.14 100% 1,665,000$ 1,665,000$ B-27 PA (1/3) VINTAGE NAPA VALLEY TO IH 35W 0.65 100% 7,975,000$ 7,975,000$ B-28 C WILLOWWOOD 1250' W OF HIGHLAND PARK TO BONNIE BRAE 0.24 100% 2,079,000$ 2,079,000$ B-29 SA BONNIE BRAE IH 35E TO FM 1515 0.14 100% 1,285,000$ 1,285,000$ B-30 SA BONNIE BRAE FM 1515 TO WILLOWWOOD 1.09 100% 11,351,000$ 11,351,000$ B-31 SA BONNIE BRAE HIGHLAND PARK TO ROSELAWN 0.48 50% 4,521,000$ 2,260,500$ B-32 SA COUNTRY CLUB FORT WORTH TO HOBSON 0.08 100% 1,229,000$ 1,229,000$ B-33 SA COUNTRY CLUB HOBSON TO RYAN 1.00 100% 15,093,000$ 15,093,000$ B-34 SA COUNTRY CLUB RYAN TO HICKORY CREEK 0.66 50% 11,902,000$ 5,951,000$ B-35 PA FORT WORTH COUNTRY CLUB TO VINTAGE 1.32 100% 26,417,000$ 26,417,000$ B-36 PA FORT WORTH VINTAGE TO BONNIE BRAE 1.07 100% 19,299,000$ 19,299,000$ B-37 PA FORT WORTH BONNIE BRAE TO BRUSH CREEK 0.24 100% 4,811,000$ 4,811,000$ B-38 PA FORT WORTH BRUSH CREEK TO CRAWFORD 1.11 100% 20,190,000$ 20,190,000$ B-39 Completed JOHN PAINE JOHNSON TO ATHENS 0.42 100% 238,000$ 238,000$ B-40 SA JOHN PAINE VINTAGE TO 1045' S OF VINTAGE 0.20 100% 3,254,000$ 3,254,000$ B-41 C PARVIN-ROSELAWN PARVIN TO ROSELAWN 0.52 100% 3,878,000$ 3,878,000$ B-42 PA (1/3) TEASLEY IH 35E TO LONDONDERRY 0.25 100% 1,039,000$ 1,039,000$ B-43 PA (1/3) TEASLEY LONDONDERRY TO HOBSON 0.97 100% 4,558,000$ 4,558,000$ B-44 PA (1/3) TEASLEY LILLIAN B MILLER TO PENNSYLVANIA 0.36 100% 1,493,000$ 1,493,000$ B-45 PA (1/3) TEASLEY PENNSYLVANIA TO HOBSON 0.21 100% 857,000$ 857,000$ 290,216,000$ 37,660$ 290,253,660$ SA BService Area Project Cost Subtotal 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area Total Cost in SERVICE AREA B a. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Denton. b. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 28 Table 5.C – 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area C Service Area Proj. # Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area C-1 PA BARTHOLD MASCH BRANCH TO 5200' W OF IIH 35 0.98 50% 17,750,000$ 8,875,000$ C-2 SA BOBCAT FM 2164 TO IH-35 2.75 100% 37,762,000$ 37,762,000$ C-3 SA FM 1173 IH 35 TO 4605' W OF IH 35 0.87 100% 13,401,000$ 13,401,000$ C-4 SA FM 1173 4605' W OF IH 35 TO LOVERS 0.41 50% 7,704,000$ 3,852,000$ C-5 SA FM 2164-IH 35 FM 2164 TO IH 35 2.73 100% 37,057,000$ 37,057,000$ C-6 PA GANZER FM 2164 TO GANZER 2.40 100% 39,748,000$ 39,748,000$ C-7 PA GANZER 2900' E OF IH 35 TO IH 35 0.55 100% 11,525,000$ 11,525,000$ C-8 PA GANZER 1620' E OF BARTHOLD TO BARTHOLD 0.31 50% 5,708,000$ 2,854,000$ C-9 PA GANZER BARTHOLD TO RECTOR 0.49 50% 9,208,000$ 4,604,000$ A-13,C-10 SA JIM CHRISTAL OLD SH 24 TO WESTERN 0.55 50% 9,746,000$ 4,873,000$ A-14,C-11 SA JIM CHRISTAL WESTERN TO MASCH BRANCH 0.66 50% 11,964,000$ 5,982,000$ A-15,C-12 SA JIM CHRISTAL MASCH BRANCH TO THOMAS J EGAN 1.13 50% 18,502,000$ 9,251,000$ A-16,C-13 SA JIM CHRISTAL THOMAS J EGAN TO 515' E OF C WOLFE 0.75 50% 12,707,000$ 6,353,500$ C-14 SA JIM CHRISTAL 945' W OF C WOLFE TO NAIL 0.59 50% 9,547,000$ 4,773,500$ C-15 SA JIM CHRISTAL NAIL TO 2045' W of Nail 0.39 50% 5,841,000$ 2,920,500$ C-16 C MARSHALL 2845' N OF HAMPTON TO HAMPTON 0.54 100% 5,249,000$ 5,249,000$ C-17 C MARSHALL HAMPTON TO US 380 0.59 100% 4,397,000$ 4,397,000$ C-18 SA MASCH BRANCH MASCH BRANCH TO DARBY SMITH 0.65 100% 10,602,000$ 10,602,000$ C-19 C WESTWARD NORTHWAY TO BONNIE BRAE 0.22 100% 1,672,000$ 1,672,000$ C-20 SA (1/2) RINEY US 77 TO 2460' W OF US 77 0.47 100% 3,156,000$ 3,156,000$ C-21 SA (1/2) RINEY 2460' W OF US 77 TO BONNIE BRAE 0.19 100% 1,258,000$ 1,258,000$ C-22 PA (1/3) US 77 WINDSOR TO FM 2164 0.22 100% 1,432,000$ 1,432,000$ C-23 PA (1/3) US 77 RINEY TO WINDSOR 0.46 100% 2,819,000$ 2,819,000$ C-24 PA (1/3) US 77 RINEY TO RINEY 0.40 100% 2,075,000$ 2,075,000$ C-25 PA (1/3) US 77 BONNIE BRAE TO RINEY 0.75 100% 3,126,000$ 3,126,000$ C-26 PA (1/3) US 77 LOOP 288 TO BONNIE BRAE 0.33 100% 1,859,000$ 1,859,000$ C-27 PA (1/3) US 77 IH 35 TO LOOP 288 0.87 100% 4,739,000$ 4,739,000$ C-28 C MASCH BRANCH-NAIL MASCH BRANCH TO 1295' W OF MASCH BRANCH 0.25 100% 2,094,000$ 2,094,000$ C-29 C MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 1050' E OF LOOP 288 TO 1550' W OF LOOP 288 0.49 100% 4,450,000$ 4,450,000$ C-30 C MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 1335' W OF THOMAS J EGAN TO 775' E OF C WOLFE 0.48 100% 4,379,000$ 4,379,000$ C-31 C MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 775' E OF C WOLFE TO 690' W OF C WOLFE 0.28 50% 2,092,000$ 1,046,000$ C-32 C MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 690' W OF C WOLFE TO NAIL 0.58 100% 4,376,000$ 4,376,000$ C-33 SA WESTGATE WESTGATE TO 1460' E OF IH-35 0.18 100% 2,336,000$ 2,336,000$ C-34 SA WINDSOR US 77 TO HINKLE 0.46 100% 6,912,000$ 6,912,000$ C-35 SA (1/2) WINDSOR HINKLE TO BONNIE BRAE 0.99 100% 6,972,000$ 6,972,000$ C-36 SA (1/2) WINDSOR WESTGATE TO 145' W OF CLARENDON 0.10 100% 649,000$ 649,000$ C-37 SA (1/2) WINDSOR 220' W OF WINDSOR FARMS TO IH 35 0.17 100% 1,162,000$ 1,162,000$ C-38 SA WINDSOR IH 35 TO MASCH BRANCH 1.24 100% 17,606,000$ 17,606,000$ C-39 SA BARTHOLD GANZER TO 2600' S OF GANZER 0.49 100% 7,425,000$ 7,425,000$ C-40 PA BONNIE BRAE MILAM TO LOOP 288 3.13 100% 52,065,000$ 52,065,000$ C-41 SA BONNIE BRAE LOOP 288 TO US 77 0.24 100% 3,008,000$ 3,008,000$ C-42 SA BONNIE BRAE US 77 TO RINEY 0.38 100% 6,587,000$ 6,587,000$ C-43 SA BONNIE BRAE RINEY TO WINDSOR 0.66 100% 10,320,000$ 10,320,000$ C-44 SA BONNIE BRAE WINDSOR TO US 380 0.68 100% 11,981,000$ 11,981,000$ C-45,E-29 SA BONNIE BRAE US 380 TO PANHANDLE 0.55 50% 8,310,000$ 4,155,000$ C-46,E-30 SA BONNIE BRAE PANHANDLE TO SCRIPTURE 0.20 50% 3,056,000$ 1,528,000$ C-47,E-31 SA BONNIE BRAE SCRIPTURE TO OAK 0.22 50% 3,370,000$ 1,685,000$ C-48,E-32 SA BONNIE BRAE OAK TO HICKORY 0.07 50% 1,087,000$ 543,500$ C-49,E-33 SA BONNIE BRAE HICKORY TO PRAIRIE 0.27 50% 4,070,000$ 2,035,000$ C-50,E-34 SA BONNIE BRAE PRAIRIE TO IH 35E 0.16 50% 2,457,000$ 1,228,500$ C-51 PA C WOLFE US 380 TO WESTERN-NAIL 0.51 100% 8,901,000$ 8,901,000$ C-52 C FALLMEADOW MEADOWLEDGE TO GARDENVIEW 0.17 100% 1,303,000$ 1,303,000$ C-53,D-22 PA FM 2164 MILAM TO LOOP 288 2.62 50% 49,925,000$ 24,962,500$ C-54,D-28 SA LOCUST LOOP 288 TO HERCULES 0.43 50% 6,954,000$ 3,477,000$ C-55,D-29 SA LOCUST HERCULES TO BELL 0.45 50% 7,433,000$ 3,716,500$ C-56,D-30 SA LOCUST BELL TO WINDSOR 0.24 50% 3,628,000$ 1,814,000$ C-57,D-31 SA LOCUST WINDSOR TO FM 2164 0.25 50% 3,841,000$ 1,920,500$ C-58 SA LOVERS FM 1173 TO MASCH BRANCH 0.78 100% 12,266,000$ 12,266,000$ C-59 SA LOVERS 1085' N OF MASCH BRANCH TO MASCH BRANCH 0.21 100% 3,349,000$ 3,349,000$ C-60 SA LOVERS LN CONNECTOR LOVERS TO LOOP 288 0.06 100% 756,000$ 756,000$ C-61 SA LOVERS LN CONNECTOR LOOP 288 TO 1085' N OF MASCH BRANCH 0.08 100% 972,000$ 972,000$ C-62 SA MASCH BRANCH 1295' S OF FM 1173 TO JACKSON 0.79 50% 11,908,000$ 5,954,000$ C-63 SA MASCH BRANCH LOVERS TO US 380 0.72 100% 11,352,000$ 11,352,000$ C-64 SA MASCH BRANCH US 380 TO JIM CHRISTAL 0.78 100% 12,137,000$ 12,137,000$ C-65 SA MILAM-LOOP 288 MILAM TO LOOP 288 2.71 100% 36,182,000$ 36,182,000$ C-66 SA MILAM-US 77 MILAM TO GANZER 1.51 100% 20,546,000$ 20,546,000$ C-67 SA MILAM-US 77 GANZER TO LONG 0.73 100% 11,567,000$ 11,567,000$ C-68 SA MILAM-US 77 LONG TO US 77 0.53 100% 7,359,000$ 7,359,000$ C-69 C NICOSIA LOOP 288 TO BEALL 0.12 100% 1,169,000$ 1,169,000$ C-70 SA THOMAS J EGAN US 380 TO JIM CHRISTAL 0.76 100% 12,353,000$ 12,353,000$ C-71 PA WESTERN US 380 TO JIM CHRISTAL 0.80 100% 14,699,000$ 14,699,000$ 587,514,000$ 37,660$ 587,551,660$ SA CService Area Project Cost Subtotal 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service AreaTotal Cost in SERVICE AREA C a. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Denton. b. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 29 Table 5.D – 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area D Service Area Proj. # Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area D-1 SA BOBCAT 560' W OF FM 2164 TO FM 2164 0.11 50% 1,601,000$ 800,500$ D-2 C FISHTRAP MINGO TO GEESLING 0.36 50% 2,939,000$ 1,469,500$ D-3 PA GANZER 15,500' E OF SHERMAN TO 4600' W OF SHERMAN 3.41 100% 53,936,000$ 53,936,000$ D-4 SA GRIBBLE SPRINGS INDIAN WELLS TO 3015' W OF INDIAN WELLS 0.57 50% 8,861,000$ 4,430,500$ D-5 SA HARTLEE FIELD 4220' E OF COOPER CREEK TO COOPER CREEK 0.80 50% 12,051,000$ 6,025,500$ D-6 SA HARTLEE FIELD COOPER CREEK TO 5170' W OF COOPER CREEK 0.98 50% 14,764,000$ 7,382,000$ D-7 C HARTLEE FIELD 600' E OF SHERMAN TO SHERMAN 0.11 50% 855,000$ 427,500$ D-8 SA HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 HARTLEE FIELD TO SHERMAN 0.43 100% 5,392,000$ 5,392,000$ D-9 SA HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 SHERMAN TO 3500' W OF SHERMAN 0.66 100% 8,386,000$ 8,386,000$ D-10 SA HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 STUART TO 1485' W OF STUART 0.28 50% 3,809,000$ 1,904,500$ D-11 SA HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 475' W OF FM 2164 TO FM 2164 0.09 100% 1,139,000$ 1,139,000$ D-12 C LONG 510' W OF FM 2164 TO FM 2164 0.10 100% 726,000$ 726,000$ D-13 SA MINGO E CITY LIMITS TO COOPER CREEK 0.09 100% 1,315,000$ 1,315,000$ D-14 SA MINGO COOPER CREEK TO LOOP 288 0.44 100% 6,583,000$ 6,583,000$ D-15 SA MINGO LOOP 288 TO US 380 0.43 100% 7,937,000$ 7,937,000$ D-16 C KINGS ROW SILVER DOME TO LOOP 288 0.50 100% 3,779,000$ 3,779,000$ D-17 C SILVER DOME COOPER CREEK TO FARRIS RD 0.41 50% 3,117,000$ 1,558,500$ D-18 C COLLINS HARTLEE FIELD TO 2730' S OF HARTLEE FIELD 0.84 50% 6,818,000$ 3,409,000$ D-19 SA COOPER CREEK SHERMAN TO HARTLEE FIELD 1.91 100% 25,554,000$ 25,554,000$ D-20 SA COOPER CREEK SILVER DOME TO MINGO 0.83 50% 12,452,000$ 6,226,000$ D-21 PA COOPER CREEK MINGO TO US 380 0.32 100% 7,361,000$ 7,361,000$ C-53,D-22 PA FM 2164 MILAM TO LOOP 288 2.62 50%49,925,000$ 24,962,500$ D-23 PA GREEN VALLEY 2395' S OF FM 2153 TO 2935' N OF SHEPARD 1.47 100% 24,463,000$ 24,463,000$ D-24 SA GREEN VALLEY WARSCHUN TO SHERMAN 0.40 100% 6,234,000$ 6,234,000$ D-25 SA INDIAN WELLS 1615' S OF FM 2153 TO 4930' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS 0.73 100% 10,021,000$ 10,021,000$ D-26 SA INDIAN WELLS 4930' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS TO 2905' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS 0.38 50% 4,853,000$ 2,426,500$ D-27 SA INDIAN WELLS 2905' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS TO GRIBBLE SPRINGS 0.55 50% 8,296,000$ 4,148,000$ C-54,D-28 SA LOCUST LOOP 288 TO HERCULES 0.43 50% 6,954,000$ 3,477,000$ C-55,D-29 SA LOCUST HERCULES TO BELL 0.45 50% 7,433,000$ 3,716,500$ C-56,D-30 SA LOCUST BELL TO WINDSOR 0.24 50% 3,628,000$ 1,814,000$ C-57,D-31 SA LOCUST WINDSOR TO FM 2164 0.25 50% 3,841,000$ 1,920,500$ D-32 SA SHERMAN LOOP 288 TO HERCULES 0.31 100% 4,713,000$ 4,713,000$ D-33 SA SHERMAN HERCULES TO KINGS 0.36 100% 5,455,000$ 5,455,000$ D-34 SA SHERMAN KINGS TO WINDSOR 0.38 100% 7,223,000$ 7,223,000$ D-35 SA SHERMAN WINDSOR TO WILSONWOOD 0.19 100% 2,856,000$ 2,856,000$ D-36 SA SHERMAN WILSONWOOD TO CORONADO 0.22 100% 3,328,000$ 3,328,000$ D-37 SA SHERMAN CORONADO TO GREENWOOD 0.31 100% 4,685,000$ 4,685,000$ D-38 SA SHERMAN GREENWOOD TO BELL 0.16 100% 2,357,000$ 2,357,000$ D-39 SA SHERMAN BELL TO LOCUST 0.32 100% 4,899,000$ 4,899,000$ D-40 C WINDSOR LOOP 288 TO DOMINION 0.16 100% 1,225,000$ 1,225,000$ 275,665,500$ 37,660$ 275,703,160$ SA DService Area Project Cost Subtotal 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service AreaTotal Cost in SERVICE AREA D a. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Denton. b. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 30 Table 5.E – 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area E Service Area Proj. # Class Roadway Limits Length (mi) % In Service Area Total Project Cost Cost in Service Area E-1 C AUDRA LOOP 288 TO 1185' W OF LOOP 288 0.22 100% 1,687,000$ 1,687,000$ E-2 SA BLAGG LAKEVIEW TO GEESLING 0.71 100% 11,181,000$ 11,181,000$ E-3 SA BLAGG GEESLING TO 2175' W OF GEESLING 0.41 100% 7,651,000$ 7,651,000$ E-4 SA BLAGG 235' E OF MAYHILL TO MAYHILL 0.04 50%563,000$ 281,500$ E-5 PA (1/3) DALLAS TEASLEY TO IH 35E 0.87 100% 3,624,000$ 3,624,000$ E-6 C DUCHESS TRAILHEAD TO WOODROW 0.76 100% 5,949,000$ 5,949,000$ E-7 SA FM 426 LANEY TO GRISSOM 0.57 100% 9,953,000$ 9,953,000$ E-8 Completed MCKINNEY GRISSOM TO LOOP 288 1.65 100% 1,551,000$ 1,551,000$ E-9 SA MCKINNEY LOOP 288 TO CARDINAL 0.13 100% 1,914,000$ 1,914,000$ E-10 SA MCKINNEY CARDINAL TO MOCKINGBIRD 0.22 100% 3,270,000$ 3,270,000$ E-11 SA MCKINNEY MOCKINGBIRD TO MACK 0.61 100% 9,268,000$ 9,268,000$ E-12 SA MCKINNEY MACK TO AUDRA 0.29 100% 4,399,000$ 4,399,000$ E-13 SA MILLS TRINITY TO MAYHILL 1.40 100% 23,115,000$ 23,115,000$ E-14 SA MILLS LAKEVIEW TO MAYHILL 0.41 100% 5,235,000$ 5,235,000$ E-15 SA MINGO US 380 TO OLD NORTH 0.14 100% 2,172,000$ 2,172,000$ E-16 SA MINGO OLD NORTH TO NOTTINGHAM 0.48 100% 7,268,000$ 7,268,000$ E-17 SA MINGO NOTTINGHAM TO PERTAIN 0.56 100% 8,381,000$ 8,381,000$ E-18 SA MINGO PERTAIN TO RUDDELL 0.18 100% 2,700,000$ 2,700,000$ E-19 SA MINGO RUDDELL TO WILLIS 0.11 100% 1,714,000$ 1,714,000$ E-20 SA MINGO WILLIS TO WITHERS 0.44 100% 6,583,000$ 6,583,000$ E-21 SA MINGO WITHERS TO PAISLEY 0.04 100% 671,000$ 671,000$ E-22 SA MINGO PAISLEY TO BELL 0.19 100% 2,813,000$ 2,813,000$ E-23 SA (1/2) MORSE MAYHILL TO KIMBERLY 0.22 100% 1,969,000$ 1,969,000$ E-24 SA SHADY OAKS WOODROW TO TEASLEY 0.58 100% 9,967,000$ 9,967,000$ E-25 SA SPENCER MAYHILL TO LOOP 288 0.44 100% 6,862,000$ 6,862,000$ E-26 C TREATMENT PLANT MCKINNEY TO POST OAK 0.63 100% 4,731,000$ 4,731,000$ E-27 SA TREATMENT PLANT POST OAK TO 1325' W OF POST OAK 0.25 100% 5,015,000$ 5,015,000$ E-28 SA TREATMENT PLANT 1325' W OF POST OAK TO MAYHILL 0.75 100% 11,310,000$ 11,310,000$ C-45,E-29 SA BONNIE BRAE US 380 TO PANHANDLE 0.55 50% 8,310,000$ 4,155,000$ C-46,E-30 SA BONNIE BRAE PANHANDLE TO SCRIPTURE 0.20 50% 3,056,000$ 1,528,000$ C-47,E-31 SA BONNIE BRAE SCRIPTURE TO OAK 0.22 50% 3,370,000$ 1,685,000$ C-48,E-32 SA BONNIE BRAE OAK TO HICKORY 0.07 50% 1,087,000$ 543,500$ C-49,E-33 SA BONNIE BRAE HICKORY TO PRAIRIE 0.27 50% 4,070,000$ 2,035,000$ C-50,E-34 SA BONNIE BRAE PRAIRIE TO IH 35E 0.16 50% 2,457,000$ 1,228,500$ E-35 C CARDINAL ORIOLE TO MCKINNEY 0.42 100% 3,167,000$ 3,167,000$ E-36 PA GEESLING US 380 TO BLAGG 0.46 100% 8,237,000$ 8,237,000$ E-37 PA GEESLING US 380 TO BLAGG 1.02 100% 18,210,000$ 18,210,000$ E-38 PA (1/3) LAKEVIEW POST OAK TO SHADY SHORES 0.26 100% 2,294,000$ 2,294,000$ E-39 PA (1/3) MAYHILL US 380 TO PROMINENCE 0.44 100% 2,467,000$ 2,467,000$ E-40 PA (1/3) MAYHILL PROMINENCE TO 770' N OF RUSSELL NEWMAN 0.39 100% 2,155,000$ 2,155,000$ E-41 PA (1/3) MAYHILL 770' N OF RUSSELL NEWMAN TO RUSSELL NEWMAN 0.15 50% 819,000$ 409,500$ E-42 PA (1/3) MAYHILL RUSSELL NEWMAN TO 460' S OF RUSSELL NEWMAN 0.09 50% 487,000$ 243,500$ E-43 PA (1/3) MAYHILL 460' S OF RUSSELL NEWMAN TO MILLS 0.20 100% 1,142,000$ 1,142,000$ E-44 PA (1/3) MAYHILL MILLS TO MCKINNEY 0.37 100% 2,066,000$ 2,066,000$ E-45 PA (1/3) MAYHILL MCKINNEY TO MORSE 0.39 100% 2,161,000$ 2,161,000$ E-46 PA (1/3) MAYHILL MORSE TO SPENCER 0.67 100% 3,717,000$ 3,717,000$ E-47 PA (1/3) MAYHILL SPENCER TO EDWARDS 0.60 100% 3,864,000$ 3,864,000$ E-48 PA (1/3) MAYHILL 2725' N OF COLORADO TO COLORADO 0.52 100% 4,477,000$ 4,477,000$ E-49 PA (1/3) MAYHILL COLORADO TO IH 35E 0.44 100% 1,840,000$ 1,840,000$ E-50 PA MAYHILL CONNECTOR MAYHILL TO QUAILCREEK 0.13 100% 2,071,000$ 2,071,000$ E-51 C MOCKINGBIRD MCKINNEY TO 625' N OF DUCHESS 0.16 100% 1,217,000$ 1,217,000$ E-52 SA MOCKINGBIRD DUCHESS TO SHADY OAKS 0.41 100% 7,039,000$ 7,039,000$ E-53 SA MOCKINGBIRD SHADY OAKS TO SPENCER 0.53 100% 6,721,000$ 6,721,000$ E-54 PA POST OAK MILLS TO SPENCER 1.30 100% 20,228,000$ 20,228,000$ E-55 PA POST OAK TREATMENT PLANT TO EDWARDS 1.27 100% 21,525,000$ 21,525,000$ E-56 PA POST OAK EDWARDS TO POCKRUS PAGE 0.51 100% 8,015,000$ 8,015,000$ E-57 C SWISHER EDWARDS TO POCKRUS PAGE 0.50 100% 3,750,000$ 3,750,000$ E-58 PA (1/3) TEASLEY DALLAS TO IH 35E 0.35 100% 2,077,000$ 2,077,000$ E-59 C N STAR SPENCER TO ROY 0.32 100% 2,427,000$ 2,427,000$ E-60 C ROY MAYHILL TO N STAR 0.21 100% 1,594,000$ 1,594,000$ 305,523,500$ 37,660$ 305,561,160$ Total Cost in SERVICE AREA ESA EService Area Project Cost Subtotal 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Cost Per Service Area a. These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Denton. b. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 31 F. Service Unit Calculation The basic service unit for the computation of Denton’s Roadway Impact Fees is the vehicle- mile of travel during the afternoon peak-hour (as explained on Pg. 20). To determine the cost per service unit, it is necessary to project the growth in vehicle-miles of travel for the service area for the ten-year period. The growth in vehicle-miles from 2022 to 2032 is based upon projected changes in residential units and employment for the period. In order to determine this growth, estimates of residential units, basic employment, service employment, and retail employment for 2022 were made, along with growth projections for each of these demographic statistics through 2032. The Land Use Assumptions section of this report details the growth estimates used for impact fee determination. For the purposes of impact fees, all developed and developable land is categorized as either residential or employment. For residential land uses, the existing and projected number of dwelling units are estimated. The number of dwelling units in each service area is multiplied by a transportation demand factor (discussed in more detail below) to compute the vehicle-miles of travel that occur during the afternoon peak hour. This factor indicates the average amount of demand created by the residential land uses in the service area. For employment land uses, the process is similar. The Land Use Assumptions section of this report provides existing and projected number of building square footages for three (3) categories of employment – basic, service, and retail. These categories correspond to an aggregation of other specific land use categories based on the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). Building square footage is the most common independent variable for the estimation of non-residential trips in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. This characteristic is more appropriate than the number of employees, because building square footage is tied more closely to trip generation and is known at the time of application for any development that would require the assessment of an impact fee. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 32 The existing and projected land use assumptions for the dwelling units and the square footage of basic, service, and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected increase in vehicle-miles of travel. As noted earlier, a transportation demand factor is applied to these values and then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle-miles of demand for each service area. The transportation demand factors are aggregate rates derived from two sources – the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition and the National Household Travel Survey performed by the FHWA. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition provides the number of trips that are produced or attracted to the land use for each dwelling unit, square foot of building, or other corresponding unit. For the retail category of land uses, the rate is adjusted to account for the fact that a percentage of retail trips are made by people who would otherwise be traveling past that particular establishment anyway, such as a trip between work and home. For example, a stop at a nearby supermarket on the way home from work does not create a new trip onto the roadway network. These trips are called pass-by trips, and since the travel demand is accounted for in the land use calculations relative to the primary trip, it is necessary to discount the retail trip generation rates to avoid double counting trips. The next component of the transportation demand factor accounts for the length of each trip. The average trip length for each category is based on the National Household Travel Survey conducted by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 33 The computation of the transportation demand factor is based on the following equation: Variables: TDF = Transportation Demand Factor, T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit), Pb = Pass-By Discount (% of trips), Lmax = Maximum Trip Length (miles), L = Average Trip Length (miles), and OD = Origin-Destination Reduction (50%) The maximum trip length was limited to six (6) miles based on the maximum trip length within each service area. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code allows for a service area of six (6) miles, and the service areas within Denton are closely approximated with a six (6) mile distance. The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the maximum trip length is the origin-destination reduction. This adjustment is made because the Roadway Impact Fee is charged to both the origin and destination end of the trip. For example, impact fee methodology will account for a trip from home to work within Denton to both residential and non-residential land uses. To avoid counting these trips twice as both residential and non-residential trips, a 50% origin-destination (OD) reduction factor is applied. Therefore, only half of the trip length is assessed to each land use, and the total trip is only counted once. This methodology is consistent with that used in the National Household Travel Survey. )6or *(min *)1(* max max where...ODLL LPTTDFb  2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 34 Table 6 shows the derivation of the Transportation Demand Factor for the residential land uses and the three (3) non-residential land use categories. The values utilized for all variables shown in the transportation demand factor equation are also shown in the table. Table 6. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations Variable Single Family Multi-Family Basic Service Retail T 0.94 0.51 0.65 1.44 5.19 Pb 0% 0% 0% 0% 34% L 9.79 9.79 10.02 14.65 5.60 Lmax * 4.90 4.90 5.01 6.00 2.80 TDF 4.61 2.50 3.26 8.64 9.60 * Lmax is less than 6 miles for residential and retail land uses; therefore this lower trip length is used for calculating the TDF for these land uses. Variables: TDF = Transportation Demand Factor, T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit), Pb = Pass-By Discount (% of trips), Lmax = Maximum Trip Length (miles), L = Average Trip Length (miles), and OD = Origin-Destination Reduction (50%) The application of the demographic projections and the transportation demand factors are presented in the 10-Year Growth Projections in Table 7. This table shows the total vehicle- miles by service area for the years 2022 and 2032. These estimates and projections lead to the Vehicle-Miles of Travel for both 2022 and 2032. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 35 2022 - 2032 Growth Projections1TOTALSingle Family UnitsTrip RateTDF2VEHICLE MILES3Multi-Family UnitsTrip RateTDF2VEHICLE MILES3BASIC SERVICE RETAILBASIC6SERVICE7RETAIL8BASIC SERVICE RETAIL TOTALVEHICLE MILES100.94 0.510.65 1.44 5.19A3,212 14,807 970 2,425 2,843,000 591,000 871,000 9,268 5,106 8,362 22,736 39,968B2,009 9,261 387 968 415,000 238,000 285,000 1,353 2,056 2,736 6,14516,374C1,538 7,090 1,015 2,538 3,518,000 689,000 446,000 11,469 5,953 4,282 21,704 31,332D847 3,905 215 538 815,000 206,000 287,000 2,657 1,780 2,755 7,19211,634E1,219 5,620 1,291 3,228 1,831,000 519,000 505,000 5,969 4,484 4,848 15,301 24,148Totals8,825 40,683 3,878 9,695 9,422,000 2,243,000 2,394,000 30,716 19,379 22,983 73,078123,456VEHICLE-MILES OF INCREASE (2022 - 2032)Notes:1 From City of Denton 2022 Land Use Assumptions for Roadway Impact FeesA39,9682 Transportation Demand Factor for each Service Area (from LUVMET) using Single Family Detached Housing land use and trip generation rateB16,3743 Calculated by multiplying TDF by the number of dwelling unitsC31,3324 From City of Denton 2022 Land Use Assumptions for Roadway Impact FeesD11,6345 Trip generation rate and Transportation Demand Factors from LUVMET for each land useE24,1486 'Basic' corresponds to General Light Industrial land use and trip generation rate7 'Service' corresponds to General Office land use and trip generation rate8 'Retail' corresponds to Shopping Plaza (40-150k) land use and trip generation rate9 Calculated by multiplying Transportation Demand Factor by the number of thousand square feet for each land use10 Residential plus Employment vehicle-mile totals for each Service AreaSERVICE AREAVEH-MILESSERVICE AREARESIDENTIAL VEHICLE-MILESEMPLOYMENT SQUARE FEET4TRANS. DEMAND FACTOR5EMPLOYMENT VEHICLE-MILES94.612.503.268.649.60 Table 7. 10-Year Growth Projections 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 36 V. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULATION A. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit This section presents the maximum assessable impact fee rate calculated for each service area. The maximum assessable impact fee is the sum of the eligible Roadway Impact Fee CIP costs for the service area divided by the growth in travel attributable to new development projected to occur within the 10-year period. A majority of the components of this calculation have been described and presented in previous sections of this report. The purpose of this section is to document the computation for each service area and to demonstrate that the guidelines provided by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code have been addressed. Table 8 illustrates the computation of the maximum assessable impact fee computed for each service area. Each row in the table is numbered to simplify explanation of the calculation. The calculation of the maximum assessable impact fee is shown in Table 9. Each row in the table is numbered to simplify explanation of the calculation. Table 8. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation Line Title Description 1 Total Vehicle-Miles of Capacity Added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP The total number of vehicle-miles added to the service area based on the capacity, length, and number of lanes in each project (from Appendix B – CIP Units of Supply) Each project identified in the CIP will add a certain amount of capacity to the City’s roadway network based on its length and classification. This line displays the total amount added within each service area. 2 Total Vehicle-Miles of Existing Demand A measure of the amount of traffic currently using the roadway facilities upon which capacity is being added. (from Appendix B – CIP Units of Supply) A number of facilities identified in the CIP have traffic currently utilizing a portion of their existing capacity. This line displays the total amount of capacity along these facilities currently being used by existing traffic. 3 Total Vehicle-Miles of Existing Deficiencies Number of vehicle-miles of travel that are not accommodated by the existing roadway system (from Appendix C – Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory) In order to ensure that existing deficiencies on the City’s roadway network are not recoverable through impact fees, this line is based on the entire roadway network within the service area. Any roadway within the service area that is deficient – even those not identified on the Roadway Impact Fee CIP – will have these additional trips removed from the calculation. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 37 4 Net Amount of Vehicle- Miles of Capacity Added A measurement of the amount of vehicle-miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP that will not be utilized by existing demand (Line 1 – Line 2 – Line 3) This calculation identifies the portion of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP (in vehicle-miles) that may be recoverable through the collection of impact fees. 5 Total Cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP within the Service Area The total cost of the projects within each service area (from Table 5: 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan with Conceptual Level Cost Opinions) This line simply identifies the total cost of all of the projects identified in each service area. 6 Cost of Net Capacity Supplied The total Roadway Impact Fee CIP cost (Line 5) prorated by the ratio of Net Capacity Added (Line 4) to Total Capacity Added (Line 1). [(Line 4 / Line 1) * (Line 5)] Using the ratio of vehicle-miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP available to serve future growth to the total vehicle-miles added, the total cost of the CIP is reduced to the amount available for future growth (i.e. excluding existing usage and deficiencies). 7 Cost to Meet Existing Needs and Usage The difference between the Total Cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP (Line 5) and the Cost of the Net Capacity supplied (Line 6). (Line 5 – Line 6) This line is provided for information purposes only – it is to present the portion of the total cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP that is required to meet existing demand. 8 Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand over Ten Years Based upon the growth projection provided in the Land Use Assumptions, an estimate of the number of new vehicle-miles within the service area over the next ten years. (from Table 7) This line presents the amount of growth (in vehicle-miles) projected to occur within each service area over the next ten years. 9 Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth The result of dividing Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand (Line 8) by the Net Amount of Capacity Added (Line 4), limited to 100% (Line 10). This calculation is required by Chapter 395 to ensure capacity added is attributable to new growth. 10 Chapter 395 Check In order to ensure that the vehicle-miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP do not exceed the amount needed to accommodate growth beyond the ten-year window, a comparison of the two values is performed. If the amount of vehicle-miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP exceeds the growth projected to occur in the next ten years, the Roadway Impact Fee CIP cost is reduced accordingly. 11 Cost of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Attributable to New Growth The result of multiplying the Cost of Net Capacity Added (Line 6) by the Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth, limited to 100% (Line 9). This value is the total Roadway Impact Fee CIP project costs (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 38 B. Plan for Financing and the Ad Valorem Tax Credit Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan for Roadway Impact Fees to contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. Section 395.014 of the Code requires: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan…” The plan is summarized, as prepared by NewGen Strategies in Appendix D and Appendix E, Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit. The following table summarizes the portions of Table 8 that utilize this credit calculation. Line Title Description 12 Financing Costs (from Appendix D – Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit) 13 Interest Earnings (from Appendix D – Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit) 14 Existing Impact Fee Fund Balance (from Appendix D – Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit) 15 Cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP and Financing Attributable to New Growth The sum of the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth, Financing Costs, and Interest Earnings. (Line 11 + Line 12 + Line 13 – Line 14) 16 Pre-Credit Maximum Fee Per Service Unit Found by dividing the Cost of the TIP and Financing Attributable to New Growth (Line 15) by the Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand Over Ten Years (Line 8). (Line 15 / Line 8) 17 Credit for Ad Valorem Taxes A credit for the portion of ad valorem taxes projected to be generated by the new service units, as per Section 395.014 of the Local Government Code. (from Appendix D – Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit) 18 Recoverable Cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP and Financing The difference between the Cost of the TIP and Financing Attributable to New Growth (Line 15) and the Credit for Ad Valorem Taxes (Line 17). (Line 15 + Line 17) 19 Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit Found by dividing the Recoverable Cost of the TIP and Financing (Line 18) by the Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand Over Ten Years (Line 8). (Line 18 / Line 8) 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 39 C. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Determination The impact fee determination method employed by NewGen Strategies and Solutions, LLC is developed through a financial based model, which fully recognizes the requirements of Chapter 395, including the recognition of cash and/or debt financing, interest earnings, fund balances, and applicable credits associated with the use of ad valorem taxes. In developing the components of the financial model several assumptions must be made, including the following: x Financing o Method of financing (i.e. cash or debt financing) o The level of financing (e.g. 80% debt / 20% cash) o Cost of financing o Debt repayment structure x Timing and Level of Expenditures and Revenues x Interest Earnings x Annual Service Unit Growth x Portion of Ad Valorem Tax Revenue Used to Fund Impact Fee Transportation Improvements The assumptions employed in the maximum assessable impact fee determination provide a reasonable basis for forecasting, however, it must be emphasized that these assumptions may not necessarily reflect actual future conditions. To address this, Chapter 395 requires the monitoring of impact fees through the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) and allows for the option to update or revise impact fees to reflect the actual implementation of the impact fee program. Once the cost of capacity added that is attributable to growth (Table 8 - line 11) is determined, it must then be decided how the cost will be financed: cash and/or debt. For any previously funded projects, whether partially funded or in full, actual costs of capital have been included. Based on discussions with City staff, it is assumed that the City will debt finance 80% of the future project costs and cash finance 20%. For debt financing, the cost of financing is based on the City staff’s estimates of future debt costs for bonds issued with 20- 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 40 year terms, as shown in Appendix D. Debt service payments for each future debt issue are assumed to remain constant over the issue’s term. Currently, the exact timing and annual level of capital expenditures over the 10-year forecast is indeterminate; therefore, it is assumed that capital expenditures will occur in equal amounts over the 10-year program period. It is also assumed that for debt financed capital projects, the City will expend debt proceeds over a 3-year timeframe. For the calculation of the maximum assessable impact fee, debt is assumed to be issued in equal amounts for each year. Because of the 10-year forecast limitation, and in order to recognize the full amount of debt to be issued for the cost of capacity added that is attributable to growth during the 10- year period, a portion of years 8, 9, and 10 are assumed to be spent in the final 3 years. Because debt is issued over 20-year terms and impact fees developed herein are to be charged over a10-year period, sufficient fund balance must be generated to meet the future debt service obligations. Because of the generation of the fund balance, excess monies will be available for interest earnings. Chapter 395 states that interest earnings are funds of the impact fee account and are to be held to the same restrictions as impact fee revenues. Therefore, in order to recognize that interest earnings are used to fund transportation improvements, interest earnings are credited against the costs recoverable through impact fees. It should be noted that Chapter 395 does not require the upfront recognition of interest earnings in the impact fee determination; however, in an effort to acknowledge the time value of the impact fee payers’ monies, interest earnings have been credited. Interest is assumed to be earned at an annual rate of 2.00% based on discussions with City staff. As with the timing and level of the capital expenditures over the 10-year forecast, the timing and annual level of service unit growth over the 10-year program period is indeterminate at the present time. As such, it is assumed that service unit growth will be consistent over the 10- year forecast. Chapter 395 requires a plan for awarding either a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and/or utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that are used for payment of improvements that are included in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP. As an alternative, a credit equal to 50% of the total cost of implementing the Roadway Impact Fee CIP may be used. The City has elected to pursue the determination of a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax revenues generated by new service units during the program 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 41 period that are used for payment of improvements that are included in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP. It should be noted that the credit is not a determination to recognize the total ad valorem tax revenue generated by new service units, but is only a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax revenue that is used for payment of improvements that are included in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP. Theoretically, the credit determination could be zero (0) if the City does not utilize any of the new service unit ad valorem tax revenue to fund improvements that are included in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP. However, to be conservative and recognize potential cash flow issues that can occur with the funding of major capital improvement projects, it is assumed that the cash funded projects (50% of the improvement costs included in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP) could potentially be funded by ad valorem tax revenue. Since payments made through ad valorem tax revenue will consist of not only the revenue generated by new service units in the defined service area, but also existing property owners throughout the City, the portion attributable to the new service units in the defined service area must be isolated, as illustrated in the credit calculation in Appendix D. The following summarizes the financial model’s determination of the maximum assessable impact fee: x Recoverable Impact Fee Transportation Improvements Costs (Table 8, line 11) x Plus: Financing Costs (Table 8, line 12) x Less: Interest Earnings (Table 8, line 13) x Pre-Credit Recoverable Costs for Impact Fee (Table 8, line 15) x Less: Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues (Table 8, line 17) x Maximum Recoverable Costs for Impact Fee (Table 8, line 18) 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 42 Table 9. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee A BCDE 1 TOTAL VEH-MI OF CAPACITY ADDED BY THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP (FROM ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP SERVICE UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B)a 120,658 89,974 145,092 61,918 92,971 2 TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEMAND (FROM ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP SERVICE UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B)8,471 29,557 11,526 11,586 23,997 3 TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEFICIENCIES (FROM EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES INVENTORY, APPENDIX C) 1,348 22,182 2,406 8,418 7,367 4 NET AMOUNT OF VEH-MI OF CAPACITY ADDED (LINE 1 - LINE 2 - LINE 3)110,839 38,235 131,160 41,914 61,607 5 TOTAL COST OF THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP AND STUDY WITHIN SERVICE AREA (FROM TABLES 5A TO 5E) $ 268,239,160 $ 290,253,660 $ 587,551,660 $ 275,703,160 $ 305,561,160 6 COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED (LINE 4 / LINE 1) * (LINE 5) $ 246,410,186 $ 123,345,063 $ 531,133,872 $ 186,631,064 $ 202,479,336 7 COST TO MEET EXISTING NEEDS AND USAGE (LINE 5 - LINE 6) $ 21,828,974 $ 166,908,597 $ 56,417,788 $ 89,072,096 $ 103,081,824 8 TOTAL VEH-MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER TEN YEARS (FROM TABLE 7 AND LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS)39,968 16,374 31,332 11,634 24,148 9 PERCENT OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 8 / LINE 4) 36.0% 42.8% 23.8% 27.7% 39.1% 10 IF LINE 8 > LINE 4, REDUCE LINE 9 TO 100%, OTHERWISE NO CHANGE 36.0% 42.8% 23.8% 27.7% 39.1% 11 COST OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 6 * LINE 10) $ 88,707,667 $ 52,791,687 $ 126,409,862 $ 51,696,805 $79,169,420 12 FINANCING COSTS (FROM APPENDIX D) $ 43,092,001 $ 24,683,794 $ 61,414,578 $ 25,105,399 $ 38,714,769 13 INTEREST EARNINGS (FROM APPENDIX D) $ (21,126,791) $ (12,622,463) $ (30,142,851) $ (12,702,369) $ (19,534,195) 14 EXISTING IMPACT FEE FUND BALANCE $ 4,394,807 $ 2,004,188 $ 3,170,473 $ 1,685,562 $ 4,840,794 15 COST OF THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP AND FINANCING ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW GROWTH (LINE 11 + LINE 12 + LINE 13 - LINE 14) $ 106,278,070 $ 62,848,830 $ 154,511,115 $ 62,414,273 $ 93,509,199 16 PRE-CREDIT MAXIMUM FEE PER SERVICE UNIT (LINE 15 / LINE 8) $ 2,659 $ 3,838 $ 4,931 $ 5,365 $ 3,872 17 CREDIT FOR AD VALOREM TAXES (FROM APPENDIX D) $ (6,535,564) $ (1,580,744) $ (7,396,751) $ (1,157,132) $ (3,628,065) 18 RECOVERABLE COST OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP AND FINANCING (LINE 15 + LINE 17) $ 99,742,506 $ 61,268,086 $ 147,114,364 $ 61,257,141 $ 89,881,134 19 MAXIMUM ASSESSABLE FEE PER SERVICE UNIT (LINE 18 / LINE 8) $ 2,496 $ 3,742 $ 4,695 $ 5,265 $ 3,722 SERVICE AREA: a. For Service Areas A and B, the Total Vehicle-Miles of Capacity Added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP includes capacity added by select thoroughfares that will be built by developments without City cost participation, in addition to capacity added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP. Detailed information for these additional facilities is provided in Appendix B. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 43 D. Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development The Roadway Impact Fee is determined by multiplying the impact fee rate by the number of service units projected for the proposed development. For this purpose, the City will utilize the Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET), presented in Table 10. This table lists the predominant land uses that may occur within the City of Denton. For each land use, the development unit that defines the development’s magnitude with respect to transportation demand is shown. Although every possible use cannot be anticipated, the majority of local uses are found in this table. The descriptions for each land use are presented in Table 11. If the exact use is not listed, one similar in trip-making characteristics can serve as a reasonable proxy. The individual land uses are grouped into categories, such as residential, office, commercial, industrial, and institutional. The trip rates presented for each land use is a fundamental component of the LUVMET. The trip rate is the average number of trips generated during the afternoon peak hour by each land use per development unit. The next column in Table 10, if applicable to the land use, presents the number of trips to and from certain land uses reduced by pass-by trips, as previously discussed. The definitive source of the trip generation and pass-by statistics is the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, the latest edition. This manual utilizes trip generation studies for a variety of land uses throughout the United States, and is the standard used by traffic engineers and transportation planners for traffic impact analysis, site design, and transportation planning. However, for land uses not contained within the 11th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, an alternative service unit demand could be calculated by completing a trip generation study based on the procedure identified in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. To convert vehicle trips to vehicle-miles, it is necessary to multiply trips by trip length. The trip length values are based on the National Household Travel Survey performed by the FHWA. The other adjustment to trip length is the 50% origin-destination reduction to avoid double counting of trips. At this stage, another important aspect of the state law is applied – the limit on transportation service unit demand. If the adjusted trip length is above six (6) miles, the maximum trip length used for calculation is reduced to six (6) miles. This reduction, as 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 44 discussed previously, limits the maximum trip length to the approximate size of the service areas. The remaining column in the LUVMET shows the vehicle-miles per development unit. This number is the product of the trip rate and the maximum trip length. This number, previously referred to as the Transportation Demand Factor, is used in the impact fee to compute the number of service units attributed to each land use category. The number of service units is multiplied by the impact fee rate (established by City ordinance) in order to determine the impact fee for a development. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 45 Table 10 - Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) ITE Land Use Code Development Unit Trip Gen Rate (PM) Pass- by Rate Pass-by Source Trip Rate Trip Length (mi) Adj. For O-D Adj. Trip Length (mi) Max Trip Length (mi) Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit PORT AND TERMINAL Intermodal Truck Terminal 030 1,000 SF GFA 1.87 1.87 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 9.37 INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial 110 1,000 SF GFA 0.65 0.65 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 3.26 Industrial Park 130 1,000 SF GFA 0.34 0.34 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 1.70 Warehousing 150 1,000 SF GFA 0.18 0.18 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 0.90 Mini-Warehouse 151 1,000 SF GFA 0.15 0.15 10.02 50% 5.01 5.01 0.75 RESIDENTIAL Single-Family Detached Housing 210 Dwelling Unit 0.94 0.94 9.79 50% 4.90 4.90 4.61 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) 220 Dwelling Unit 0.51 0.51 9.79 50% 4.90 4.90 2.50 Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) 221 Dwelling Unit 0.39 0.39 9.79 50% 4.90 4.90 1.91 Multifamily Housing (High-Rise) 222 Dwelling Unit 0.32 0.32 9.79 50% 4.90 4.90 1.57 Residential Condominium/Townhome 230 Dwelling Unit 0.36 0.36 9.79 50% 4.90 4.90 1.76 Senior Adult Housing-Single-Family 251 Dwelling Unit 0.30 0.30 9.79 50% 4.90 4.90 1.47 Senior Adult Housing-Multifamily 252 Dwelling Unit 0.25 0.25 9.79 50% 4.90 4.90 1.23 Assisted Living 254 Beds 0.24 0.24 9.79 50% 4.90 4.90 1.18 LODGING Hotel 310 Room 0.59 0.59 6.43 50% 3.21 3.21 1.89 Motel 320 Room 0.36 0.36 6.43 50% 3.21 3.21 1.16 RECREATIONAL Golf Driving Range 432 Tees/Driving Positions 1.25 1.25 7.86 50% 3.93 3.93 4.91 Golf Course 430 Acre 0.28 0.28 7.86 50% 3.93 3.93 1.10 Recreational Community Center 495 1,000 SF GFA 2.50 2.50 7.86 50% 3.93 3.93 9.83 Ice Skating Rink 465 1,000 SF GFA 1.33 1.33 7.86 50% 3.93 3.93 5.23 Miniature Golf Course 431 Holes 0.33 0.33 7.86 50% 3.93 3.93 1.30 Multiplex Movie Theater 445 Movie Screens 13.96 13.96 15.77 50% 7.88 6.00 83.76 Racquet / Tennis Club 491 Tennis Court 3.82 3.82 7.86 50% 3.93 3.93 15.01 INSTITUTIONAL Church 560 1,000 SF GFA 0.49 0.49 8.31 50% 4.15 4.15 2.03 Day Care Center 565 1,000 SF GFA 11.12 44% B 6.23 3.49 50% 1.74 1.74 10.84 Elementary School 520 Students 0.16 0.16 3.49 50% 1.74 1.74 0.28 Middle School/Junior High School 522 Students 0.15 0.15 3.49 50% 1.74 1.74 0.26 High School 530 Students 0.14 0.14 3.49 50% 1.74 1.74 0.24 Junior / Community College 540 Students 0.11 0.11 10.44 50% 5.22 5.22 0.57 University / College 550 Students 0.15 0.15 10.44 50% 5.22 5.22 0.78 MEDICAL Clinic 630 1,000 SF GFA 3.69 3.69 9.85 50% 4.92 4.92 18.15 Hospital 610 1,000 SF GFA 0.86 0.86 9.85 50% 4.92 4.92 4.23 Nursing Home 620 Beds 0.14 0.14 9.85 50% 4.92 4.92 0.69 Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic 640 1,000 SF GFA 3.53 30% B 2.47 9.85 50% 4.92 4.92 12.15 OFFICE Corporate Headquarters Building 714 1,000 SF GFA 1.30 1.30 14.65 50% 7.32 6.00 7.80 General Office Building 710 1,000 SF GFA 1.44 1.44 14.65 50% 7.32 6.00 8.64 Medical-Dental Office Building 720 1,000 SF GFA 3.93 3.93 9.85 50% 4.92 4.92 19.34 Single Tenant Office Building 715 1,000 SF GFA 1.76 1.76 14.65 50% 7.32 6.00 10.56 Office Park 750 1,000 SF GFA 1.30 1.30 14.65 50% 7.32 6.00 7.80 Key to Sources of Pass-by Rates: A: ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (September 2017) B: Estimated by Kimley-Horn based on ITE rates for similar categories C: ITE rate adjusted upward by KHA based on logical relationship to other categories Land Use Category 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 46 Table 10 (Cont’d). Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) ITE Land Use Code Development Unit Trip Gen Rate (PM) Pass- by Rate Pass-by Source Trip Rate Trip Length (mi) Adj. For O-D Adj. Trip Length (mi) Max Trip Length (mi) Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Care Center 942 1,000 SF GFA 3.11 40% B 1.87 4.45 50% 2.22 2.22 4.15 Automobile Parts Sales 843 1,000 SF GFA 4.90 43% A 2.79 4.45 50% 2.22 2.22 6.19 Gasoline/Service Station 944 Vehicle Fueling Position 13.91 42% A 8.07 1.20 50% 0.60 0.60 4.84 Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market 945 Vehicle Fueling Position 18.42 56% B 8.10 1.20 50% 0.60 0.60 4.86 New Car Sales 841 1,000 SF GFA 2.42 20% B 1.94 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 5.43 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop 941 Servicing Positions 4.85 40% B 2.91 4.45 50% 2.22 2.22 6.46 Self-Service Car Wash 947 Wash Stalls 5.54 40% B 3.32 1.20 50% 0.60 0.60 1.99 Tire Store 848 1,000 SF GFA 3.75 28% A 2.70 4.45 50% 2.22 2.22 5.99 Dining Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 934 1,000 SF GFA 33.03 50% A 16.52 5.64 50% 2.82 2.82 46.59 Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 933 1,000 SF GFA 33.21 50% B 16.61 5.64 50% 2.82 2.82 46.84 High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 932 1,000 SF GFA 9.05 43% A 5.16 5.64 50% 2.82 2.82 14.55 Quality Restaurant 931 1,000 SF GFA 7.80 44% A 4.37 5.64 50% 2.82 2.82 12.32 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 937 1,000 SF GFA 38.99 70% A 11.70 5.64 50% 2.82 2.82 32.99 Other Retail Free-Standing Discount Store 815 1,000 SF GFA 4.83 30% C 3.38 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 9.46 Nursery (Garden Center) 817 1,000 SF GFA 6.94 30% B 4.86 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 13.61 Home Improvement Superstore 862 1,000 SF GFA 2.33 48% A 1.21 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 3.39 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive-Thru Window 880 1,000 SF GFA 8.51 53% A 4.00 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 11.20 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-Thru Window 881 1,000 SF GFA 10.29 49% A 5.25 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 14.70 Shopping Center (>150k) 820 1,000 SF GLA 3.40 34% A 2.24 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 6.27 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 821 1,000 SF GLA 5.19 34% A 3.43 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 9.60 Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) 822 1,000 SF GLA 6.59 34% A 4.35 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 12.18 Supermarket 850 1,000 SF GFA 9.24 36% A 5.91 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 16.55 Toy/Children's Superstore 864 1,000 SF GFA 5.00 30% B 3.50 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 9.80 Department Store 875 1,000 SF GFA 1.95 30% B 1.37 5.60 50% 2.80 2.80 3.84 SERVICES Walk-In Bank 911 1,000 SF GFA 12.13 40% B 7.28 4.45 50% 2.22 2.22 16.16 Drive-In Bank 912 Drive-in Lanes 27.07 47% A 14.35 4.45 50% 2.22 2.22 31.86 Hair Salon 918 1,000 SF GLA 1.45 30% B 1.02 6.41 50% 3.20 3.20 3.26 Key to Sources of Pass-by Rates: A: ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (September 2017) B: Estimated by Kimley-Horn based on ITE rates for similar categories C: ITE rate adjusted upward by KHA based on logical relationship to other categories Land Use Category 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 47 Table 11 - Land Use Descriptions ITE Land Use Code Land Use Description PORT AND TERMINAL Intermodal Truck Terminal 030 Point of good transfer between trucks or between trucks and rail INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial 110 Emphasis on activities other than manufacturing; typically employing fewer than 500 workers Industrial Park 130 Area containing a number of industries or related facilities Warehousing 150 Devoted to storage of materials but may have included office and maintenance areas Mini-Warehouse 151 Facilities with a number of units rented to others for the storage of goods RESIDENTIAL Single-Family Detached Housing 210 Single-family detached homes on individual lots Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) 220 At least 3 rental dwelling units and one or two levels (floors) per building Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) 221 At least 3 rental dwelling units and between three and ten levels (floors) per building Multifamily Housing (High-Rise) 222 At least 3 rental dwelling units and more than ten levels (floors) per building Residential Condominium/Townhome 230 Single-family ownership units that have at least one other single-family owned unit within the same building Senior Adult Housing-Single-Family 251 Consists of detached independent living developments that include amenities such as golf courses and swimming pools Senior Adult Housing-Multifamily 252 Consists of attached independent living developments that include limited social or recreation services Assisted Living 254 Residential settings that provide either routine general protective oversight or assistance with activities. LODGING Hotel 310 Lodging facilities that typically have on-site restaurants, lounges, meeting and/or banquet rooms, or other retail shops and services Motel 320 Lodging facilities that may have small on-site restaurant or buffet area but little or no meeting space RECREATIONAL Golf Driving Range 432 Facilities with driving tees for practice; may provide individual or group lessons; may have prop shop and/or refreshment facilities Golf Course 430 May include municipal courses and private country clubs; may have driving ranges, pro shops, and restaurant/banquet facilities Recreational Community Center 495 Category includes racquet clubs, health/fitness clubs, can include facilities such as YMCA's Ice Skating Rink 465 Rinks for ice skating and related sports; may contain spectator areas and refreshment facilities Miniature Golf Course 431 One or more individual putting courses; category should not be used when part of a larger entertainment center(with batting cages, video game centers, etc) Multiplex Movie Theater 445 Movie theater with audience seating, minimum of ten screens, lobby, and refreshment area. Racquet / Tennis Club 491 Indoor or outdoor facilities specifically designed for playing tennis INSTITUTIONAL Church 560 Churches and houses of worship Day Care Center 565 Generally includes facilities for care of pre-school aged children, generally includes classrooms, offices, eating areas, and playgrounds Elementary School 520 Serves students who have not yet entered middle or junior high school Middle School/Junior High School 522 Serves students who have completed elementary school but have not yet entered high school High School 530 Serves students who have completed middle or junior high school Junior / Community College 540 Higher education campus providing undergraduate degrees, often focused on local students University / College 550 Higher education campus providing undergraduate and graduate degrees MEDICAL Clinic 630 Facilities with limited diagnostic and outpatient care Hospital 610 Medical and surgical facilities with overnight accommodations Nursing Home 620 Rest and convalescent homes with residents who do little or no driving Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic 640 Rest and convalescent homes with residents who do little or no driving OFFICE Corporate Headquarters Building 714 Office building housing corporate headquarters of a single company or organization General Office Building 710 Office buildings which house multiple tenants Medical-Dental Office Building 720 Multi-tenant building with offices for physicians and/or dentists Single Tenant Office Building 715 Single tenant office buildings other than corporate headquarters Office Park 750 Office buildings (typically low-rise) in a campus setting and served by a common roadway system Land Use Category 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 48 Table 1 (Cont’d). Land Use Descriptions ITE Land Use Code Land Use Description COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Care Center 942 Automobile repair and servicing including stereo installations and upholstering Automobile Parts Sales 843 Retail sale of auto parts but no on-site vehicle repair Gasoline/Service Station 944 Gasoline sales without convenience store or car wash; may include repair Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market 945 Gasoline sales with convenience store where the primary business is gasoline sales New Car Sales 841 New car dealerships, typically with automobile servicing, part sales, and used car sales Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop 941 Primary business is to perform oil changes and fluid/filter changes with other repair services not provided Self-Service Car Wash 947 Has stalls for driver to park and wash the vehicle Tire Store 848 Primary business is sales and installation of tires; usually do not have large storage or warehouse area Dining Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 934 High-turnover fast food restaurant for carry-out and eat-in customers with a drive-thru window Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 933 High-turnover fast food restaurant for carry-out and eat-in customers without a drive-thru window High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 932 High-turnover fast food restaurant for carry-out and eat-in customers, but without a drive-thru window Quality Restaurant 931 Restaurants with turnover rates less than one hour; typically includes moderately-priced chain restaurants Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 937 Restaurants that specialize in Coffee and/or Donuts with a drive-thru window Other Retail Free-Standing Discount Store 815 Category includes free-standing stores with off-street parking; typically offer a variety of products and services with long store hours Nursery (Garden Center) 817 Building with a yard of planting or landscape stock; may have office, storage, shipping or greenhouse facilities Home Improvement Superstore 862 Warehouse-type facilities offering a large variety of products and services including lumber, tool, paint, lighting, and fixtures, among other items. Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive-Thru Window 880 Facilities that primarily sell prescription and non-prescription drugs without a drive-through window Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-Thru Window 881 Facilities that primarily sell prescription and non-prescription drugs with a drive-through window Shopping Center (>150k) 820 Integrated group of commercial establishments; planning, owned, and managed as a unit. >150k sq. ft. Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 821 Integrated group of commercial establishments; planning, owned, and managed as a unit. 40-150k sq. ft. Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) 822 Integrated group of commercial establishments; planning, owned, and managed as a unit. <40k sq. ft. Supermarket 850 Primary business is sale of groceries, food, and household cleaning items; may include photo, pharmacy, video rental, and/or ATM Toy/Children's Superstore 864 Businesses specializing in child-oriented merchandise Department Store 875 Free-standing stores that specialize in the sale of apparel, footwear, bedding, home products, jewelry, etc. SERVICES Walk-In Bank 911 Banks with their own parking lots, no drive-in lanes but contain non-drive-through ATMs Drive-In Bank 912 Banking facilities to conduct financial transactions from the vehicle; also usually a part of a walk-in bank Hair Salon 918 Facilities that specialize in cosmetic and beauty services including hair cutting and styling Land Use Category 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 49 VI. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS The following section details two (2) examples of maximum assessable Roadway Impact Fee calculations. Example 1: Development Type - One (1) Unit of Single-Family Housing in Service Area A Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps – Example 1 Step 1 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle-Miles Per Development Unit From Table 10 [Land Use – Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table] Development Type: 1 Dwelling Unit of Single-Family Detached Housing Number of Development Units: 1 Dwelling Unit Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 4.61 Step 2 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile) From Table 9, Line 14 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area A: $2,496 Step 3 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit Impact Fee = 1 * 4.61 * $2,496 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $11,507 Example 2: Development Type – 125,000 square foot Home Improvement Superstore in Service Area D Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps – Example 2 Step 1 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle-Miles Per Development Unit From Table 10 [Land Use – Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table] Development Type: 125,000 square feet of Home Improvement Superstore Development Unit: 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 3.39 Step 2 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile) From Table 9, Line 14 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area D: $5,265 Step 3 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit Impact Fee = 125 * 3.39 * $5,265 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $2,231,044 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 50 VII. ADOPTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEES A. Adoption Process Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of Roadway Impact Fees. A Capital Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC) is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Impact Fees CIP used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee’s findings for consideration by the City Council. This CIAC also reviews the Roadway Impact Fee ordinance and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the CIAC is required to adequately represent the building and development communities. The City Council then conducts a first public hearing on the Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Impact Fee CIP and a second public hearing on the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the CIAC is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the Roadway Impact Fees CIP at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the CIAC oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. B. Collection and Use of Transportation Impact Fees Roadway Impact fees are assessed when a final plat is recorded. The assessment defines the impact of each unit at the time of platting, according to land use, and may not exceed the maximum impact fee allowed by law. Roadway Impact Fees are collected when a building permit is issued. Therefore, funds are not collected until development-impacts are introduced to the transportation system. Funds collected within a service area can be used only within the same service area. Finally, fees must be utilized within 10 years of collection, or must be refunded with interest. 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 51 VIII. CONCLUSIONS The City of Denton has established a process to implement the assessment and collection of Roadway Impact Fees through the adoption of an impact fee ordinance that is consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. This report establishes the maximum allowable Roadway Impact Fee that could be assessed by the City of Denton, as shown in the previously referenced Table 9. This document serves as a guide to the assessment of Roadway Impact Fees pertaining to future development, and the City’s need for transportation improvements to accommodate that growth. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may establish an impact fee amount to be collected, up to the calculated maximum and establish the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance accordingly. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the data and methodology used in this analysis are appropriate and consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Furthermore, the Land Use Assumptions and the proposed Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan are appropriately incorporated into the development of the maximum assessable Roadway Impact Fee. Below is the listing of the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study’s Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile): SERVICE AREA: A B C D E 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Maximum Assessable Fee Per Vehicle-Mile $2,496 $3,742 $4,695 $5,265 $3,722 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas 52 APPENDICES A. Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections SERVICE AREA A SERVICE AREA B SERVICE AREA C SERVICE AREA D SERVICE AREA E FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION EXAMPLE COSTING SHEETS B. Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Supply C. Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory D. Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit Summary E. Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit Supporting Exhibits F. Consideration for the Hunter Ranch and Cole Ranch Operating Agreements 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas Appendix A – Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Construction CostContingency/ROWEngineering/Survey/SUEInspection/Materials TestingFrom To Pavement and Allowances 15% 16% Cost Cost Total Drainage Cost 3.5%A-1CORBINIH-35W CORBIN 3,055 SA Recon SA Widening 6,485,996$ 973,000$ 1,038,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000$ 227,010$ 100% 10,164,000$ 10,164,000$ A-2CORBIN500' S OF SPRINGSIDE CORBIN 1,410 SA New SA New 2,511,393$ 377,000$ 402,000$ -$ -$ -$ 87,899$ 100% 3,378,000$ 3,378,000$ A-3FM 1515IH 35W CORBIN 5,990 PA Recon PA Widening 15,001,383$ 2,251,000$ 2,401,000$ 1,200,000$ 400,000$ 1,755,000$ 525,048$ 100% 23,533,000$ 23,533,000$ A-4FM 1515CORBIN WESTERN 1,175 PA Recon PA Widening 2,942,675$ 442,000$ 471,000$ -$ -$ -$ 102,994$ 100% 3,959,000$ 3,959,000$ A-5FM 1515WESTERN WESTCOURT 1,555 PA Recon PA Widening 3,894,349$ 585,000$ 624,000$ -$ 500,000$ 1,755,000$ 136,302$ 100% 7,495,000$ 7,495,000$ A-6FM 1515WESTCOURT MASCH BRANCH 620 PA Recon PA Widening 1,552,731$ 233,000$ 249,000$ -$ -$ -$ 54,346$ 100% 2,089,000$ 2,089,000$ A-7FM 1515TOM COLE 3435' W OF TOM COLE 3,435 PA Recon PA Widening 8,602,629$ 1,291,000$ 1,377,000$ -$ 500,000$ 1,755,000$ 301,092$ 100% 13,827,000$ 13,827,000$ A-8FM 15153435' W OF TOM COLE 530' E OF C WOLFE 3,750 PA Recon PA Widening 9,391,517$ 1,409,000$ 1,503,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ 328,703$ 100% 13,132,000$ 13,132,000$ A-9H LIVELYC WOLFE 2145' W OF H LIVELY 2,145 PA Recon PA Widening 5,371,948$ 806,000$ 860,000$ -$ -$ -$ 188,018$ 50% 7,226,000$ 3,613,000$ A-10H LIVELY2145' W OF H LIVELY 2150' W OF ED ROBSON 3,915 PA Recon PA Widening 9,804,743$ 1,471,000$ 1,569,000$ -$ -$ -$ 343,166$ 100% 13,188,000$ 13,188,000$ A-11IH-35-CORBINIH-35 CORBIN 4,420 C New C New 4,675,377$ 702,000$ 749,000$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 163,638$ 100% 7,040,000$ 7,040,000$ A-16,C-13JIM CHRISTALTHOMAS J EGAN 515' E OF C WOLFE 3,945 SA Recon SA Widening 8,375,533$ 1,257,000$ 1,341,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000$ 293,144$ 50% 12,707,000$ 6,353,500$ A-17PRECISION-WESTERNPRECISION WESTERN 3,420 C New C New 3,617,599$ 543,000$ 579,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ 500,000$ 126,616$ 100% 6,566,000$ 6,566,000$ A-19ROBSON RANCHED ROBSON YARBROUGH 7,150 PA Recon PA Widening 17,906,492$ 2,686,000$ 2,866,000$ -$ -$ 1,250,000$ 626,727$ 50% 25,335,000$ 12,667,500$ A-20SPRINGSIDECORBIN UNDERWOOD 1,835 SA Recon SA Widening 3,895,844$ 585,000$ 624,000$ -$ 900,000$ -$ 136,355$ 100% 6,141,000$ 6,141,000$ A-21SPRINGSIDEUNDERWOOD WESTCOURT 865 SA Recon SA Widening 1,836,460$ 276,000$ 294,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ 64,276$ 100% 2,971,000$ 2,971,000$ A-22TJ EGAN-LOOP 288LOOP 288 2440' W OF LOOP 288 2,440 C New C New 2,580,977$ 388,000$ 413,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 90,334$ 100% 3,722,000$ 3,722,000$ A-23C WOLFE1140' S OF TOM COLE FM 2449 7,270 PA Recon PA Widening 18,207,020$ 2,732,000$ 2,914,000$ -$ 1,000,000$ 750,000$ 637,246$ 50% 26,240,000$ 13,120,000$ A-24C WOLFEFM 2449 H LIVELY 3,315 PA Recon PA Widening 8,302,101$ 1,246,000$ 1,329,000$ -$ 600,000$ 250,000$ 290,574$ 50% 12,018,000$ 6,009,000$ A-25CORBINIH-35-CORBIN SPRINGSIDE 2,050 C New C Widening 2,168,444$ 326,000$ 347,000$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 75,896$ 100% 3,667,000$ 3,667,000$ A-26J CHRISTAL-H LIVELYFM 2449 H LIVELY 3,305 C New C New 3,495,955$ 525,000$ 560,000$ -$ 400,000$ 250,000$ 122,358$ 100% 5,353,000$ 5,353,000$ A-27PRECISIONJIM CHRISTAL 1635' N OF FM 1515 2,385 C New C New 2,522,799$ 379,000$ 404,000$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 88,298$ 100% 3,694,000$ 3,694,000$ A-31WESTCOURTFM 1515 SPRINGSIDE 4,165 SA (1/2) SA (1/2) Widening 3,971,565$ 596,000$ 636,000$ -$ -$ -$ 139,005$ 100% 5,343,000$ 5,343,000$ A-32WESTERNJIM CHRISTAL AIRPORT 6,485 PA (1/3) PA (1/3) Widening 3,805,620$ 571,000$ 609,000$ -$ 1,500,000$ -$ 133,197$ 100% 6,619,000$ 6,619,000$ A-33WESTERNFM 1515 SPRINGSIDE 4,175 PA New PA New 9,179,489$ 1,377,000$ 1,469,000$ -$ -$ 1,755,000$ 321,282$ 100% 14,102,000$ 14,102,000$ 347,875,000$ 268,201,500$ Percent in Service AreaTOTALCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyService Area A Impact Fee CIPCost in Service Area# Roadway NameLimits Length(FT)Costing ClassificationRailroad CrossingsIntersectionsStreams/Channel CrossingsTotal CostRoadway Classification Roadway StatusCity of Denton2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Construction CostContingency/ROWEngineering/Survey/SUEInspection/Materials TestingFrom To Pavement and Allowances 15% 16% Cost Cost Total Drainage Cost 3.5%B-1ALLREDBONNIE BRAE BRUSH CREEK 4,285 C Widening 4,532,577$ 680,000$ 726,000$ -$ -$ -$ 158,640$ -$ 50% 6,097,000$ 3,048,500$ B-2 ALLRED BRUSH CREEK JOHN PAINE 1,610 PA Widening 4,032,091$ 605,000$ 646,000$ -$ -$ -$ 141,123$ -$ 50% 5,424,000$ 2,712,000$ B-3BRUSH CREEK815' E OF COUNTRY CLUB COUNTRY CLUB 815 PA Widening 2,041,090$ 307,000$ 327,000$ -$ -$ -$ 71,438$ -$ 100% 2,747,000$ 2,747,000$ B-4 BRUSH CREEK COUNTRY CLUB 1935' W OF COUNTRY CLUB 1,935 PA Widening 4,846,023$ 727,000$ 776,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 169,611$ -$ 100% 6,769,000$ 6,769,000$ B-5BRUSH CREEK2180' E OF FORT WORTH FORT WORTH 2,180 PA Widening 5,459,602$ 819,000$ 874,000$ -$ -$ -$ 191,086$ -$ 100% 7,344,000$ 7,344,000$ B-6 BRUSH CREEK FORT WORTH 590' E OF ALLRED 3,615 PA New 7,948,228$ -$ 1,272,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ 278,188$ -$ 100% 10,698,000$ 10,698,000$ B-7CORBINBONNIE BRAE IH-35W 3,505 SA Widening 7,441,380$ 1,117,000$ 1,191,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ 250,000$ 260,448$ -$ 100% 10,760,000$ 10,760,000$ B-8 CREEKDALE PIMLICO RIVERCHASE 3,230 C New 3,416,621$ 513,000$ 547,000$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 119,582$ -$ 100% 5,346,000$ 5,346,000$ B-9CREEKDALETHISTLE WAY OAKBLUFF 2,080 C New 2,200,177$ 331,000$ 353,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 77,006$ -$ 100% 3,461,000$ 3,461,000$ B-10 EL PASEO BELMONT COUNTRY CLUB 1,910 C New 2,020,355$ 304,000$ 324,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ 250,000$ 70,712$ -$ 100% 3,369,000$ 3,369,000$ B-11FM 1515BONNIE BRAE IH 35W 770 PA Widening 1,928,391$ 290,000$ 309,000$ -$ -$ -$ 67,494$ -$ 100% 2,595,000$ 2,595,000$ B-12 HICKORY CREEK FM 2499 NAUTICA 1,175 PA (1/3) Widening 689,530$ 104,000$ 111,000$ -$ -$ -$ 24,134$ 676,116.28$ 100% 1,605,000$ 1,605,000$ B-13HICKORY CREEKNAUTICA TEASLEY 1,310 PA (1/3) Widening 768,753$ 116,000$ 124,000$ -$ -$ -$ 26,906$ 753,797.72$ 100% 1,789,000$ 1,789,000$ B-14 HICKORY CREEK TEASLEY MONTECITO 4,475 PA (1/3) Widening 2,626,083$ 394,000$ 421,000$ -$ 600,000.00$ -$ 91,913$ 4,505,033.56$ 100% 8,638,000$ 8,638,000$ B-15HICKORY CREEKMONTECITO 1435' W OF BIDDY BYE 2,230 PA (1/3) Widening 1,308,640$ 197,000$ 210,000$ -$ -$ -$ 45,802$ 2,244,966.44$ 50% 4,006,000$ 2,003,000$ B-16 HICKORY CREEK 1435' W OF BIDDY BYE 815' E OF COUNTRY CLUB 1,980 PA New 4,353,386$ 654,000$ 697,000$ -$ -$ 1,755,000$ 152,369$ -$ 100% 7,612,000$ 7,612,000$ B-17HOBSON LANETEASLEY MONTECITO 670 SA Widening 1,422,461$ 214,000$ 228,000$ -$ -$ -$ 49,786$ -$ 100% 1,914,000$ 1,914,000$ B-18 HOBSON LANE MONTECITO FORRESTRIDGE 1,495 SA Widening 3,173,998$ 477,000$ 508,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000$ 111,090$ -$ 100% 5,710,000$ 5,710,000$ B-19HOBSON LANEFORRESTRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 3,785 SA Widening 8,035,841$ 1,206,000$ 1,286,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ 250,000$ 281,254$ -$ 100% 11,559,000$ 11,559,000$ B-20 PARVIN MCCORMICK HIGHLAND PARK 2,665 C New 1,374,924$ 207,000$ 220,000$ -$ 300,000.00$ -$ 48,122$ -$ 100% 2,150,000$ 2,150,000$ B-21ROBINSON230' E OF WHEELER RIDGE TEASLEY 2,735 SA Widening 5,806,612$ 871,000$ 930,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 203,231$ -$ 100% 8,061,000$ 8,061,000$ B-22 RYAN TEASLEY MONTECITO 4,020 SA Widening 8,534,764$ 1,281,000$ 1,366,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 298,717$ -$ 100% 11,980,000$ 11,980,000$ B-23RYANMONTECITO FORRESTRIDGE 3,305 SA Widening 7,016,765$ 1,053,000$ 1,123,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000$ 245,587$ -$ 100% 10,878,000$ 10,878,000$ B-24 RYAN FORRESTRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 3,475 SA Widening 7,377,688$ 1,107,000$ 1,181,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ 500,000$ 258,219$ -$ 100% 10,824,000$ 10,824,000$ B-25VINTAGEFORT WORTH BONNIE BRAE 4,605 PA (1/3) Widening 2,702,371$ 406,000$ 433,000$ 1,200,000$ 500,000.00$ -$ 94,583$ 6,385,003.13$ 100% 11,721,000$ 11,721,000$ B-26 VINTAGE BONNIE BRAE NAPA VALLEY 765 PA (1/3) Widening 448,928$ 68,000$ 72,000$ -$ -$ -$ 15,712$ 1,060,700.85$ 100% 1,665,000$ 1,665,000$ B-27VINTAGENAPA VALLEY IH 35W 3,435 PA (1/3) Widening 2,015,775$ 303,000$ 323,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 70,552$ 4,762,754.78$ 100% 7,975,000$ 7,975,000$ B-28 WILLOWWOOD 1250' W OF HIGHLAND PARK BONNIE BRAE 1,285 C Widening 1,359,244$ 204,000$ 218,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 47,574$ -$ 100% 2,079,000$ 2,079,000$ B-29BONNIE BRAEIH 35E FM 1515 725 SA Widening 1,285,335$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100% 1,285,000$ 1,285,000$ B-30 BONNIE BRAE FM 1515 WILLOWWOOD 5,740 SA Widening 10,176,311$ -$ -$ 1,175,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100% 11,351,000$ 11,351,000$ B-31BONNIE BRAEHIGHLAND PARK ROSELAWN 2,550 SA New 4,520,835$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50% 4,521,000$ 2,260,500$ B-32 COUNTRY CLUB FORT WORTH HOBSON 430 SA Widening 912,922$ 137,000$ 147,000$ -$ -$ -$ 31,952$ -$ 100% 1,229,000$ 1,229,000$ B-33COUNTRY CLUBHOBSON RYAN 5,285 SA Widening 11,220,454$ 1,684,000$ 1,796,000$ -$ -$ -$ 392,716$ -$ 100% 15,093,000$ 15,093,000$ B-34 COUNTRY CLUB RYAN HICKORY CREEK 3,485 SA Widening 7,398,918$ 1,110,000$ 1,184,000$ 1,200,000$ 500,000.00$ 250,000$ 258,962$ -$ 50% 11,902,000$ 5,951,000$ B-35FORT WORTHCOUNTRY CLUB VINTAGE 6,965 PA Widening 17,443,177$ 2,617,000$ 2,791,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ 1,755,000$ 610,511$ -$ 100% 26,417,000$ 26,417,000$ B-36 FORT WORTH VINTAGE BONNIE BRAE 5,655 PA Widening 14,162,407$ 2,125,000$ 2,266,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 495,684$ -$ 100% 19,299,000$ 19,299,000$ B-37FORT WORTHBONNIE BRAE BRUSH CREEK 1,250 PA Widening 3,130,506$ 470,000$ 501,000$ -$ 600,000.00$ -$ 109,568$ -$ 100% 4,811,000$ 4,811,000$ B-38 FORT WORTH BRUSH CREEK CRAWFORD 5,845 PA Widening 14,638,244$ 2,196,000$ 2,343,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 512,339$ -$ 100% 20,190,000$ 20,190,000$ B-39JOHN PAINEJOHNSON ATHENS 2,210 Completed Widening 176,276$ 27,000$ 29,000$ -$ -$ -$ 6,170$ -$ 100% 238,000$ 238,000$ B-40 JOHN PAINE VINTAGE 1045' S OF VINTAGE 1,045 SA New 1,861,281$ 280,000$ 298,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ 250,000$ 65,145$ -$ 100% 3,254,000$ 3,254,000$ B-41PARVIN-ROSELAWNPARVIN ROSELAWN 2,725 C New 2,882,444$ 433,000$ 462,000$ -$ -$ -$ 100,886$ -$ 100% 3,878,000$ 3,878,000$ B-42 TEASLEY IH 35E LONDONDERRY 1,315 PA (1/3) Widening 771,687$ 116,000$ 124,000$ -$ -$ -$ 27,009$ -$ 100% 1,039,000$ 1,039,000$ B-43TEASLEYLONDONDERRY HOBSON 5,140 PA (1/3) Widening 3,016,328$ 453,000$ 483,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 105,571$ -$ 100% 4,558,000$ 4,558,000$ B-44 TEASLEY LILLIAN B MILLER PENNSYLVANIA 1,890 PA (1/3) Widening 1,109,117$ 167,000$ 178,000$ -$ -$ -$ 38,819$ -$ 100% 1,493,000$ 1,493,000$ B-45TEASLEYPENNSYLVANIA HOBSON 1,085 PA (1/3) Widening 636,715$ 96,000$ 102,000$ -$ -$ -$ 22,285$ -$ 100% 857,000$ 857,000$ 306,191,000$ 290,216,000$ City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyService Area B Impact Fee CIPTotal Cost Cost in Service Area#Roadway NameLimits Length(FT)Railroad CrossingsIntersectionsStreams/Channel CrossingsRoadway Classification Roadway StatusPercent in Service AreaTOTALPrevious City ContributionCity of Denton2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Construction CostContingency/ROWEngineering/Survey/SUEInspection/Materials TestingFrom To Pavement and Allowances 15% 16% Cost Cost Total Drainage Cost 3.5%C-1BARTHOLDMASCH BRANCH 5200' W OF IIH 35 5,195 PA Widening 13,010,381$ 1,952,000$ 2,082,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 455,363$ 50% 17,750,000$ 8,875,000$ C-2BOBCATFM 2164 IH-35 14,535 SA New 25,888,720$ 3,884,000$ 4,143,000$ -$ 1,500,000.00$ 1,440,000.00$ 906,105$ 100% 37,762,000$ 37,762,000$ C-3FM 1173IH 35 4605' W OF IH 35 4,605 SA Widening 9,776,763$ 1,467,000$ 1,565,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 342,187$ 100% 13,401,000$ 13,401,000$ C-4FM 11734605' W OF IH 35 LOVERS 2,190 SA Widening 4,649,535$ 698,000$ 744,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ 250,000.00$ 162,734$ 50% 7,704,000$ 3,852,000$ C-5FM 2164-IH 35FM 2164 IH 35 14,425 SA New 25,692,796$ 3,854,000$ 4,111,000$ -$ 1,000,000.00$ 1,500,000.00$ 899,248$ 100% 37,057,000$ 37,057,000$ C-6GANZERFM 2164 GANZER 12,680 PA New 27,879,262$ 4,182,000$ 4,461,000$ -$ 1,000,000.00$ 1,250,000.00$ 975,774$ 100% 39,748,000$ 39,748,000$ C-7GANZER2900' E OF IH 35 IH 35 2,900 PA Widening 7,262,773$ 1,090,000$ 1,163,000$ -$ -$ 1,755,000.00$ 254,197$ 100% 11,525,000$ 11,525,000$ C-8GANZER1620' E OF BARTHOLD BARTHOLD 1,620 PA Widening 4,057,135$ 609,000$ 650,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 142,000$ 50% 5,708,000$ 2,854,000$ C-9GANZERBARTHOLD RECTOR 2,585 PA Widening 6,473,885$ 972,000$ 1,036,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 226,586$ 50% 9,208,000$ 4,604,000$ A-13,C-10JIM CHRISTALOLD SH 24 WESTERN 2,905 SA Widening 6,167,534$ 926,000$ 987,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ 250,000.00$ 215,864$ 50% 9,746,000$ 4,873,000$ A-14,C-11JIM CHRISTALWESTERN MASCH BRANCH 3,510 SA Widening 7,451,995$ 1,118,000$ 1,193,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ 1,440,000.00$ 260,820$ 50% 11,964,000$ 5,982,000$ A-15,C-12JIM CHRISTALMASCH BRANCH THOMAS J EGAN 5,975 SA Widening 12,685,376$ 1,903,000$ 2,030,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000.00$ 443,988$ 50% 18,502,000$ 9,251,000$ A-16,C-13JIM CHRISTALTHOMAS J EGAN 515' E OF C WOLFE 3,945 SA Widening 8,375,533$ 1,257,000$ 1,341,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000.00$ 293,144$ 50% 12,707,000$ 6,353,500$ C-14JIM CHRISTAL945' W OF C WOLFE NAIL 3,115 SA Widening 6,613,380$ 993,000$ 1,059,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 231,468$ 50% 9,547,000$ 4,773,500$ C-15JIM CHRISTALNAIL 2045' W of Nail 2,045 SA Widening 4,341,690$ 652,000$ 695,000$ -$ -$ -$ 151,959$ 50% 5,841,000$ 2,920,500$ C-16MARSHALL2845' N OF HAMPTON HAMPTON 2,845 C New 3,009,377$ 452,000$ 482,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ 105,328$ 100% 5,249,000$ 5,249,000$ C-17MARSHALLHAMPTON US 380 3,090 C Widening 3,268,532$ 491,000$ 523,000$ -$ -$ -$ 114,399$ 100% 4,397,000$ 4,397,000$ C-18MASCH BRANCHMASCH BRANCH DARBY SMITH 3,450 SA Widening 7,324,611$ 1,099,000$ 1,172,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 256,361$ 100% 10,602,000$ 10,602,000$ C-19WESTWARDNORTHWAY BONNIE BRAE 1,175 C New 1,242,889$ 187,000$ 199,000$ -$ -$ -$ 43,501$ 100% 1,672,000$ 1,672,000$ C-20RINEYUS 77 2460' W OF US 77 2,460 SA (1/2) Widening 2,345,750$ 352,000$ 376,000$ -$ -$ -$ 82,101$ 100% 3,156,000$ 3,156,000$ C-21RINEY2460' W OF US 77 BONNIE BRAE 980 SA (1/2) Widening 934,486$ 141,000$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ 32,707$ 100% 1,258,000$ 1,258,000$ C-22US 77WINDSOR FM 2164 1,180 PA (1/3) Widening 692,464$ 104,000$ 111,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 24,236$ 100% 1,432,000$ 1,432,000$ C-23US 77RINEY WINDSOR 2,430 PA (1/3) Widening 1,426,007$ 214,000$ 229,000$ -$ 900,000.00$ -$ 49,910$ 100% 2,819,000$ 2,819,000$ C-24US 77RINEY RINEY 2,120 PA (1/3) Widening 1,244,088$ 187,000$ 200,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ -$ 43,543$ 100% 2,075,000$ 2,075,000$ C-25US 77BONNIE BRAE RINEY 3,960 PA (1/3) Widening 2,323,863$ 349,000$ 372,000$ -$ -$ -$ 81,335$ 100% 3,126,000$ 3,126,000$ C-26US 77LOOP 288 BONNIE BRAE 1,720 PA (1/3) Widening 1,009,355$ 152,000$ 162,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 35,327$ 100% 1,859,000$ 1,859,000$ C-27US 77IH 35 LOOP 288 4,610 PA (1/3) Widening 2,705,306$ 406,000$ 433,000$ -$ 1,100,000.00$ -$ 94,686$ 100% 4,739,000$ 4,739,000$ C-28MASCH BRANCH-NAILMASCH BRANCH 1295' W OF MASCH BRANCH 1,295 C New 1,369,822$ 206,000$ 220,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 47,944$ 100% 2,094,000$ 2,094,000$ C-29MASCH BRANCH-NAIL1050' E OF LOOP 288 1550' W OF LOOP 288 2,600 C New 2,750,222$ 413,000$ 441,000$ -$ -$ 750,000.00$ 96,258$ 100% 4,450,000$ 4,450,000$ C-30MASCH BRANCH-NAIL1335' W OF THOMAS J EGAN 775' E OF C WOLFE 2,550 C New 2,697,333$ 405,000$ 432,000$ -$ -$ 750,000.00$ 94,407$ 100% 4,379,000$ 4,379,000$ C-31MASCH BRANCH-NAIL775' E OF C WOLFE 690' W OF C WOLFE 1,470 C New 1,554,933$ 234,000$ 249,000$ -$ -$ -$ 54,423$ 50% 2,092,000$ 1,046,000$ C-32MASCH BRANCH-NAIL690' W OF C WOLFE NAIL 3,075 C New 3,252,666$ 488,000$ 521,000$ -$ -$ -$ 113,843$ 100% 4,376,000$ 4,376,000$ C-33WESTGATEWESTGATE 1460' E OF IH-35 975 SA New 1,736,601$ 261,000$ 278,000$ -$ -$ -$ 60,781$ 100% 2,336,000$ 2,336,000$ C-34WINDSORUS 77 HINKLE 2,420 SA Widening 5,137,843$ 771,000$ 823,000$ -$ -$ -$ 179,824$ 100% 6,912,000$ 6,912,000$ C-35WINDSORHINKLE BONNIE BRAE 5,240 SA (1/2) Widening 4,996,639$ 750,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 174,882$ 100% 6,972,000$ 6,972,000$ C-36WINDSORWESTGATE 145' W OF CLARENDON 505 SA (1/2) Widening 481,546$ 73,000$ 78,000$ -$ -$ -$ 16,854$ 100% 649,000$ 649,000$ C-37WINDSOR220' W OF WINDSOR FARMS IH 35 905 SA (1/2) Widening 862,969$ 130,000$ 139,000$ -$ -$ -$ 30,204$ 100% 1,162,000$ 1,162,000$ C-38WINDSORIH 35 MASCH BRANCH 6,535 SA New 11,639,683$ 1,746,000$ 1,863,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ 750,000.00$ 407,389$ 100% 17,606,000$ 17,606,000$ C-39BARTHOLDGANZER 2600' S OF GANZER 2,600 SA Widening 5,519,996$ 828,000$ 884,000$ -$ -$ -$ 193,200$ 100% 7,425,000$ 7,425,000$ C-40BONNIE BRAEMILAM LOOP 288 16,505 PA New 36,289,213$ 5,444,000$ 5,807,000$ -$ 1,500,000.00$ 1,755,000.00$ 1,270,122$ 100% 52,065,000$ 52,065,000$ C-41BONNIE BRAELOOP 288 US 77 1,255 SA New 2,235,318$ 336,000$ 358,000$ -$ -$ -$ 78,236$ 100% 3,008,000$ 3,008,000$ C-42BONNIE BRAEUS 77 RINEY 1,985 SA Widening 4,339,124$ 651,000$ 695,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 151,869$ 100% 6,587,000$ 6,587,000$ C-43BONNIE BRAERINEY WINDSOR 3,510 SA Widening 7,672,708$ 1,151,000$ 1,228,000$ -$ -$ -$ 268,545$ 100% 10,320,000$ 10,320,000$ C-44BONNIE BRAEWINDSOR US 380 3,585 SA Widening 7,836,655$ 1,176,000$ 1,254,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000.00$ 274,283$ 100% 11,981,000$ 11,981,000$ C-45,E-29BONNIE BRAEUS 380 PANHANDLE 2,910 SA Widening 6,178,150$ 927,000$ 989,000$ -$ -$ -$ 216,235$ 50% 8,310,000$ 4,155,000$ C-46,E-30BONNIE BRAEPANHANDLE SCRIPTURE 1,070 SA Widening 2,271,691$ 341,000$ 364,000$ -$ -$ -$ 79,509$ 50% 3,056,000$ 1,528,000$ C-47,E-31BONNIE BRAESCRIPTURE OAK 1,180 SA Widening 2,505,229$ 376,000$ 401,000$ -$ -$ -$ 87,683$ 50% 3,370,000$ 1,685,000$ C-48,E-32BONNIE BRAEOAK HICKORY 380 SA Widening 806,769$ 122,000$ 130,000$ -$ -$ -$ 28,237$ 50% 1,087,000$ 543,500$ C-49,E-33BONNIE BRAEHICKORY PRAIRIE 1,425 SA Widening 3,025,383$ 454,000$ 485,000$ -$ -$ -$ 105,888$ 50% 4,070,000$ 2,035,000$ C-50,E-34BONNIE BRAEPRAIRIE IH 35E 860 SA Widening 1,825,845$ 274,000$ 293,000$ -$ -$ -$ 63,905$ 50% 2,457,000$ 1,228,500$ C-51C WOLFEUS 380 WESTERN-NAIL 2,705 PA New 5,947,429$ 893,000$ 952,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 208,160$ 100% 8,901,000$ 8,901,000$ C-52FALLMEADOWMEADOWLEDGE GARDENVIEW 915 C New 967,866$ 146,000$ 155,000$ -$ -$ -$ 33,875$ 100% 1,303,000$ 1,303,000$ C-53,D-22FM 2164MILAM LOOP 288 13,855 PA Widening 34,698,524$ 5,205,000$ 5,552,000$ -$ 1,500,000.00$ 1,755,000.00$ 1,214,448$ 50% 49,925,000$ 24,962,500$ C-54,D-28LOCUSTLOOP 288 HERCULES 2,260 SA Widening 4,798,151$ 720,000$ 768,000$ -$ -$ 500,000.00$ 167,935$ 50% 6,954,000$ 3,477,000$ C-55,D-29LOCUSTHERCULES BELL 2,375 SA Widening 5,042,304$ 757,000$ 807,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 176,481$ 50% 7,433,000$ 3,716,500$ C-56,D-30LOCUSTBELL WINDSOR 1,270 SA Widening 2,696,306$ 405,000$ 432,000$ -$ -$ -$ 94,371$ 50% 3,628,000$ 1,814,000$ C-57,D-31LOCUSTWINDSOR FM 2164 1,345 SA Widening 2,855,537$ 429,000$ 457,000$ -$ -$ -$ 99,944$ 50% 3,841,000$ 1,920,500$ C-58LOVERSFM 1173 MASCH BRANCH 4,120 SA Widening 8,747,071$ 1,313,000$ 1,400,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 306,147$ 100% 12,266,000$ 12,266,000$ C-59LOVERS1085' N OF MASCH BRANCH MASCH BRANCH 1,085 SA Widening 2,303,537$ 346,000$ 369,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 80,624$ 100% 3,349,000$ 3,349,000$ C-60LOVERS LN CONNECTORLOVERS LOOP 288 315 SA New 561,056$ 85,000$ 90,000$ -$ -$ -$ 19,637$ 100% 756,000$ 756,000$ C-61LOVERS LN CONNECTORLOOP 288 1085' N OF MASCH BRANCH 405 SA New 721,358$ 109,000$ 116,000$ -$ -$ -$ 25,248$ 100% 972,000$ 972,000$ C-62MASCH BRANCH1295' S OF FM 1173 JACKSON 4,170 SA Widening 8,853,225$ 1,328,000$ 1,417,000$ -$ -$ -$ 309,863$ 50% 11,908,000$ 5,954,000$ C-63MASCH BRANCHLOVERS US 380 3,800 SA Widening 8,067,687$ 1,211,000$ 1,291,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 282,369$ 100% 11,352,000$ 11,352,000$ C-64MASCH BRANCHUS 380 JIM CHRISTAL 4,110 SA Widening 8,725,841$ 1,309,000$ 1,397,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ -$ 305,404$ 100% 12,137,000$ 12,137,000$ C-65MILAM-LOOP 288MILAM LOOP 288 14,335 SA New 25,532,494$ 3,830,000$ 4,086,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ 1,440,000.00$ 893,637$ 100% 36,182,000$ 36,182,000$ City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyService Area C Impact Fee CIPTotal Cost Cost in Service Area# Roadway NameLimits Length(FT)Railroad CrossingsIntersectionsStreams/Channel CrossingsRoadway Classification Roadway StatusPercent in Service AreaCity of Denton2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Construction CostContingency/ROWEngineering/Survey/SUEInspection/Materials TestingFrom To Pavement and Allowances 15% 16% Cost Cost Total Drainage Cost 3.5%City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyService Area C Impact Fee CIPTotal Cost Cost in Service Area# Roadway NameLimits Length(FT)Railroad CrossingsIntersectionsStreams/Channel CrossingsRoadway Classification Roadway StatusPercent in Service AreaC-66MILAM-US 77MILAM GANZER 7,975 SA New 14,204,509$ 2,131,000$ 2,273,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000.00$ 497,158$ 100% 20,546,000$ 20,546,000$ C-67MILAM-US 77GANZER LONG 3,875 SA Widening 8,226,918$ 1,235,000$ 1,317,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 287,942$ 100% 11,567,000$ 11,567,000$ C-68MILAM-US 77LONG US 77 2,800 SA New 4,987,163$ 749,000$ 798,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 174,551$ 100% 7,359,000$ 7,359,000$ C-69NICOSIALOOP 288 BEALL 645 C New 682,266$ 103,000$ 110,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 23,879$ 100% 1,169,000$ 1,169,000$ C-70THOMAS J EGANUS 380 JIM CHRISTAL 4,010 SA Widening 8,513,533$ 1,278,000$ 1,363,000$ -$ 900,000.00$ -$ 297,974$ 100% 12,353,000$ 12,353,000$ C-71WESTERNUS 380 JIM CHRISTAL 4,245 PA Widening 10,631,197$ 1,595,000$ 1,701,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ -$ 372,092$ 100% 14,699,000$ 14,699,000$ 695,918,000$ 587,514,000$ TOTALCity of Denton2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Construction CostContingency/ROWEngineering/Survey/SUEInspection/Materials TestingFrom To Pavement and Allowances 15% 16% Cost Cost Total Drainage Cost 3.5%D-1BOBCAT560' W OF FM 2164 FM 2164 560 SA Widening 1,188,922$ 179,000$ 191,000$ -$ -$ -$ 41,612$ 50% 1,601,000$ 800,500$ D-2FISHTRAPMINGO GEESLING 1,890 C New 1,999,199$ 300,000$ 320,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 69,972$ 50% 2,939,000$ 1,469,500$ D-3GANZER15,500' E OF SHERMAN 4600' W OF SHERMAN 17,985 PA New 39,543,260$ 5,932,000$ 6,327,000$ -$ -$ 750,000.00$ 1,384,014$ 100% 53,936,000$ 53,936,000$ D-4GRIBBLE SPRINGSINDIAN WELLS 3015' W OF INDIAN WELLS 3,015 SA Widening 6,401,073$ 961,000$ 1,025,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 224,038$ 50% 8,861,000$ 4,430,500$ D-5HARTLEE FIELD4220' E OF COOPER CREEK COOPER CREEK 4,220 SA Widening 8,959,379$ 1,344,000$ 1,434,000$ -$ -$ -$ 313,578$ 50% 12,051,000$ 6,025,500$ D-6HARTLEE FIELDCOOPER CREEK 5170' W OF COOPER CREEK 5,170 SA Widening 10,976,301$ 1,647,000$ 1,757,000$ -$ -$ -$ 384,171$ 50% 14,764,000$ 7,382,000$ D-7HARTLEE FIELD600' E OF SHERMAN SHERMAN 600 C Widening 634,667$ 96,000$ 102,000$ -$ -$ -$ 22,213$ 50% 855,000$ 427,500$ D-8HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164HARTLEE FIELD SHERMAN 2,250 SA New 4,007,542$ 602,000$ 642,000$ -$ -$ -$ 140,264$ 100% 5,392,000$ 5,392,000$ D-9HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164SHERMAN 3500' W OF SHERMAN 3,500 SA New 6,233,954$ 936,000$ 998,000$ -$ -$ -$ 218,188$ 100% 8,386,000$ 8,386,000$ D-10HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164STUART 1485' W OF STUART 1,485 SA New 2,644,978$ 397,000$ 424,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 92,574$ 50% 3,809,000$ 1,904,500$ D-11HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164475' W OF FM 2164 FM 2164 475 SA New 846,037$ 127,000$ 136,000$ -$ -$ -$ 29,611$ 100% 1,139,000$ 1,139,000$ D-12LONG510' W OF FM 2164 FM 2164 510 C New 539,467$ 81,000$ 87,000$ -$ -$ -$ 18,881$ 100% 726,000$ 726,000$ D-13MINGOE CITY LIMITS COOPER CREEK 460 SA Widening 976,615$ 147,000$ 157,000$ -$ -$ -$ 34,182$ 100% 1,315,000$ 1,315,000$ D-14MINGOCOOPER CREEK LOOP 288 2,305 SA Widening 4,893,689$ 735,000$ 783,000$ -$ -$ -$ 171,279$ 100% 6,583,000$ 6,583,000$ D-15MINGOLOOP 288 US 380 2,275 SA Widening 4,829,997$ 725,000$ 773,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000.00$ 169,050$ 100% 7,937,000$ 7,937,000$ D-16KINGS ROWSILVER DOME LOOP 288 2,655 C Widening 2,808,399$ 422,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ 98,294$ 100% 3,779,000$ 3,779,000$ D-17SILVER DOMECOOPER CREEK FARRIS RD 2,190 C Widening 2,316,533$ 348,000$ 371,000$ -$ -$ -$ 81,079$ 50% 3,117,000$ 1,558,500$ D-18COLLINSHARTLEE FIELD 2730' S OF HARTLEE FIELD 4,440 C Widening 4,696,532$ 705,000$ 752,000$ -$ -$ 500,000.00$ 164,379$ 50% 6,818,000$ 3,409,000$ D-19COOPER CREEKSHERMAN HARTLEE FIELD 10,065 SA New 17,927,070$ 2,690,000$ 2,869,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000.00$ 627,447$ 100% 25,554,000$ 25,554,000$ D-20COOPER CREEKSILVER DOME MINGO 4,360 SA Widening 9,256,609$ 1,389,000$ 1,482,000$ -$ -$ -$ 323,981$ 50% 12,452,000$ 6,226,000$ D-21COOPER CREEKMINGO US 380 1,680 PA Widening 4,207,399$ 632,000$ 674,000$ 1,200,000$ 500,000.00$ -$ 147,259$ 100% 7,361,000$ 7,361,000$ C-53,D-22FM 2164MILAM LOOP 288 13,855 PA Widening 34,698,524$ 5,205,000$ 5,552,000$ -$ 1,500,000.00$ 1,755,000.00$ 1,214,448$ 50% 49,925,000$ 24,962,500$ D-23GREEN VALLEY2395' S OF FM 2153 2935' N OF SHEPARD 7,765 PA New 17,072,750$ 2,561,000$ 2,732,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ 1,000,000.00$ 597,546$ 100% 24,463,000$ 24,463,000$ D-24GREEN VALLEYWARSCHUN SHERMAN 2,095 SA Widening 4,447,843$ 668,000$ 712,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 155,675$ 100% 6,234,000$ 6,234,000$ D-25INDIAN WELLS1615' S OF FM 21534930' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS3,870 SA New 6,892,972$ 1,034,000$ 1,103,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 241,254$ 100% 10,021,000$ 10,021,000$ D-26INDIAN WELLS4930' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS2905' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS2,025 SA New 3,606,788$ 542,000$ 578,000$ -$ -$ -$ 126,238$ 50% 4,853,000$ 2,426,500$ D-27INDIAN WELLS2905' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS GRIBBLE SPRINGS 2,905 SA Widening 6,167,534$ 926,000$ 987,000$ -$ -$ -$ 215,864$ 50% 8,296,000$ 4,148,000$ C-54,D-28LOCUSTLOOP 288 HERCULES 2,260 SA Widening 4,798,151$ 720,000$ 768,000$ -$ -$ 500,000.00$ 167,935$ 50% 6,954,000$ 3,477,000$ C-55,D-29LOCUSTHERCULES BELL 2,375 SA Widening 5,042,304$ 757,000$ 807,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ 250,000.00$ 176,481$ 50% 7,433,000$ 3,716,500$ C-56,D-30LOCUSTBELL WINDSOR 1,270 SA Widening 2,696,306$ 405,000$ 432,000$ -$ -$ -$ 94,371$ 50% 3,628,000$ 1,814,000$ C-57,D-31LOCUSTWINDSOR FM 2164 1,345 SA Widening 2,855,537$ 429,000$ 457,000$ -$ -$ -$ 99,944$ 50% 3,841,000$ 1,920,500$ D-32SHERMANLOOP 288 HERCULES 1,650 SA Widening 3,503,075$ 526,000$ 561,000$ -$ -$ -$ 122,608$ 100% 4,713,000$ 4,713,000$ D-33SHERMANHERCULES KINGS 1,910 SA Widening 4,055,074$ 609,000$ 649,000$ -$ -$ -$ 141,928$ 100% 5,455,000$ 5,455,000$ D-34SHERMANKINGS WINDSOR 2,025 SA Widening 4,299,228$ 645,000$ 688,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000.00$ 150,473$ 100% 7,223,000$ 7,223,000$ D-35SHERMANWINDSOR WILSONWOOD 1,000 SA Widening 2,123,076$ 319,000$ 340,000$ -$ -$ -$ 74,308$ 100% 2,856,000$ 2,856,000$ D-36SHERMANWILSONWOOD CORONADO 1,165 SA Widening 2,473,383$ 372,000$ 396,000$ -$ -$ -$ 86,568$ 100% 3,328,000$ 3,328,000$ D-37SHERMANCORONADO GREENWOOD 1,640 SA Widening 3,481,844$ 523,000$ 558,000$ -$ -$ -$ 121,865$ 100% 4,685,000$ 4,685,000$ D-38SHERMANGREENWOOD BELL 825 SA Widening 1,751,537$ 263,000$ 281,000$ -$ -$ -$ 61,304$ 100% 2,357,000$ 2,357,000$ D-39SHERMANBELL LOCUST 1,715 SA Widening 3,641,075$ 547,000$ 583,000$ -$ -$ -$ 127,438$ 100% 4,899,000$ 4,899,000$ D-40WINDSORLOOP 288 DOMINION 860 C New 909,689$ 137,000$ 146,000$ -$ -$ -$ 31,839$ 100% 1,225,000$ 1,225,000$ 351,764,000$ 275,665,500$ TOTALCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyService Area D Impact Fee CIPTotal Cost Cost in Service Area# Roadway NameLimits Length(FT)Railroad CrossingsIntersectionsStreams/Channel CrossingsRoadway Classification Roadway StatusPercent in Service AreaCity of Denton2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Construction CostContingency/ROWEngineering/Survey/SUEInspection/Materials TestingFrom To Pavement and Allowances 15% 16% Cost Cost Total Drainage Cost 3.5%E-1AUDRALOOP 288 1185' W OF LOOP 288 1,185 C New 1,253,466$ 189,000$ 201,000$ -$ -$ -$ 43,871$ -$ 100% 1,687,000$ 1,687,000$ E-2BLAGGLAKEVIEW GEESLING 3,740 SA Widening 7,940,303$ 1,192,000$ 1,271,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 277,911$ -$ 100% 11,181,000$ 11,181,000$ E-3BLAGGGEESLING 2175' W OF GEESLING 2,175 SA Widening 4,617,689$ 693,000$ 739,000$ -$ -$ 1,440,000.00$ 161,619$ -$ 100% 7,651,000$ 7,651,000$ E-4BLAGG235' E OF MAYHILL MAYHILL 235 SA New 418,565$ 63,000$ 67,000$ -$ -$ -$ 14,650$ -$ 50% 563,000$ 281,500$ E-5DALLASTEASLEY IH 35E 4,590 PA (1/3) Widening 2,693,569$ 405,000$ 431,000$ -$ -$ -$ 94,275$ -$ 100% 3,624,000$ 3,624,000$ E-6DUCHESSTRAILHEAD WOODROW 4,005 C New 4,236,399$ 636,000$ 678,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 148,274$ -$ 100% 5,949,000$ 5,949,000$ E-7FM 426LANEY GRISSOM 2,995 SA Widening 6,358,611$ 954,000$ 1,018,000$ -$ 1,400,000.00$ -$ 222,551$ -$ 100% 9,953,000$ 9,953,000$ E-8MCKINNEYGRISSOM LOOP 288 8,735 Completed Widening -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,550,811.44$ 100% 1,551,000$ 1,551,000$ E-9MCKINNEYLOOP 288 CARDINAL 670 SA Widening 1,422,461$ 214,000$ 228,000$ -$ -$ -$ 49,786$ -$ 100% 1,914,000$ 1,914,000$ E-10MCKINNEYCARDINAL MOCKINGBIRD 1,145 SA Widening 2,430,922$ 365,000$ 389,000$ -$ -$ -$ 85,082$ -$ 100% 3,270,000$ 3,270,000$ E-11MCKINNEYMOCKINGBIRD MACK 3,245 SA Widening 6,889,380$ 1,034,000$ 1,103,000$ -$ -$ -$ 241,128$ -$ 100% 9,268,000$ 9,268,000$ E-12MCKINNEYMACK AUDRA 1,540 SA Widening 3,269,536$ 491,000$ 524,000$ -$ -$ -$ 114,434$ -$ 100% 4,399,000$ 4,399,000$ E-13MILLSTRINITY MAYHILL 7,415 SA Widening 15,742,605$ 2,362,000$ 2,519,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ 1,440,000.00$ 550,991$ -$ 100% 23,115,000$ 23,115,000$ E-14MILLSLAKEVIEW MAYHILL 2,185 SA New 3,891,768$ 584,000$ 623,000$ -$ -$ -$ 136,212$ -$ 100% 5,235,000$ 5,235,000$ E-15MINGOUS 380 OLD NORTH 760 SA Widening 1,613,537$ 243,000$ 259,000$ -$ -$ -$ 56,474$ -$ 100% 2,172,000$ 2,172,000$ E-16MINGOOLD NORTH NOTTINGHAM 2,545 SA Widening 5,403,227$ 811,000$ 865,000$ -$ -$ -$ 189,113$ -$ 100% 7,268,000$ 7,268,000$ E-17MINGONOTTINGHAM PERTAIN 2,935 SA Widening 6,231,227$ 935,000$ 997,000$ -$ -$ -$ 218,093$ -$ 100% 8,381,000$ 8,381,000$ E-18MINGOPERTAIN RUDDELL 945 SA Widening 2,006,306$ 301,000$ 322,000$ -$ -$ -$ 70,221$ -$ 100% 2,700,000$ 2,700,000$ E-19MINGORUDDELL WILLIS 600 SA Widening 1,273,845$ 192,000$ 204,000$ -$ -$ -$ 44,585$ -$ 100% 1,714,000$ 1,714,000$ E-20MINGOWILLIS WITHERS 2,305 SA Widening 4,893,689$ 735,000$ 783,000$ -$ -$ -$ 171,279$ -$ 100% 6,583,000$ 6,583,000$ E-21MINGOWITHERS PAISLEY 235 SA Widening 498,923$ 75,000$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ 17,462$ -$ 100% 671,000$ 671,000$ E-22MINGOPAISLEY BELL 985 SA Widening 2,091,229$ 314,000$ 335,000$ -$ -$ -$ 73,193$ -$ 100% 2,813,000$ 2,813,000$ E-23MORSEMAYHILL KIMBERLY 1,145 SA (1/2) Widening 1,091,823$ 164,000$ 175,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 38,214$ -$ 100% 1,969,000$ 1,969,000$ E-24SHADY OAKSWOODROW TEASLEY 3,070 SA Widening 6,517,842$ 978,000$ 1,043,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ 228,124$ -$ 100% 9,967,000$ 9,967,000$ E-25SPENCERMAYHILL LOOP 288 2,315 SA Widening 4,914,920$ 738,000$ 787,000$ -$ -$ 250,000.00$ 172,022$ -$ 100% 6,862,000$ 6,862,000$ E-26TREATMENT PLANTMCKINNEY POST OAK 3,325 C New 3,517,110$ 528,000$ 563,000$ -$ -$ -$ 123,099$ -$ 100% 4,731,000$ 4,731,000$ E-27TREATMENT PLANTPOST OAK 1325' W OF POST OAK 1,325 SA New 2,359,997$ 354,000$ 378,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ 1,440,000.00$ 82,600$ -$ 100% 5,015,000$ 5,015,000$ E-28TREATMENT PLANT1325' W OF POST OAK MAYHILL 3,960 SA Widening 8,407,379$ 1,262,000$ 1,346,000$ -$ -$ -$ 294,258$ -$ 100% 11,310,000$ 11,310,000$ C-45,E-29BONNIE BRAEUS 380 PANHANDLE 2,910 SA Widening 6,178,150$ 927,000$ 989,000$ -$ -$ -$ 216,235$ -$ 50% 8,310,000$ 4,155,000$ C-46,E-30BONNIE BRAEPANHANDLE SCRIPTURE 1,070 SA Widening 2,271,691$ 341,000$ 364,000$ -$ -$ -$ 79,509$ -$ 50% 3,056,000$ 1,528,000$ C-47,E-31BONNIE BRAESCRIPTURE OAK 1,180 SA Widening 2,505,229$ 376,000$ 401,000$ -$ -$ -$ 87,683$ -$ 50% 3,370,000$ 1,685,000$ C-48,E-32BONNIE BRAEOAK HICKORY 380 SA Widening 806,769$ 122,000$ 130,000$ -$ -$ -$ 28,237$ -$ 50% 1,087,000$ 543,500$ C-49,E-33BONNIE BRAEHICKORY PRAIRIE 1,425 SA Widening 3,025,383$ 454,000$ 485,000$ -$ -$ -$ 105,888$ -$ 50% 4,070,000$ 2,035,000$ C-50,E-34BONNIE BRAEPRAIRIE IH 35E 860 SA Widening 1,825,845$ 274,000$ 293,000$ -$ -$ -$ 63,905$ -$ 50% 2,457,000$ 1,228,500$ E-35CARDINALORIOLE MCKINNEY 2,225 C New 2,353,555$ 354,000$ 377,000$ -$ -$ -$ 82,374$ -$ 100% 3,167,000$ 3,167,000$ E-36GEESLINGUS 380 BLAGG 2,445 PA Widening 6,123,269$ 919,000$ 980,000$ -$ -$ -$ 214,314$ -$ 100% 8,237,000$ 8,237,000$ E-37GEESLINGUS 380 BLAGG 5,395 PA New 11,861,879$ 1,780,000$ 1,898,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ 1,755,000.00$ 415,166$ -$ 100% 18,210,000$ 18,210,000$ E-38LAKEVIEWPOST OAK SHADY SHORES 1,385 PA (1/3) Widening 812,765$ 122,000$ 131,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ 28,447$ -$ 100% 2,294,000$ 2,294,000$ E-39MAYHILLUS 380 PROMINENCE 2,335 PA (1/3) Widening 1,370,258$ 206,000$ 220,000$ -$ -$ -$ 47,959$ 622,429.41$ 100% 2,467,000$ 2,467,000$ E-40MAYHILLPROMINENCE 770' N OF RUSSELL NEWMAN 2,040 PA (1/3) Widening 1,197,142$ 180,000$ 192,000$ -$ -$ -$ 41,900$ 543,792.72$ 100% 2,155,000$ 2,155,000$ E-41MAYHILL770' N OF RUSSELL NEWMAN RUSSELL NEWMAN 775 PA (1/3) Widening 454,796$ 69,000$ 73,000$ -$ -$ -$ 15,918$ 206,587.92$ 50% 819,000$ 409,500$ E-42MAYHILLRUSSELL NEWMAN 460' S OF RUSSELL NEWMAN 460 PA (1/3) Widening 269,944$ 41,000$ 44,000$ -$ -$ -$ 9,448$ 122,619.93$ 50% 487,000$ 243,500$ E-43MAYHILL460' S OF RUSSELL NEWMAN MILLS 1,080 PA (1/3) Widening 633,781$ 96,000$ 102,000$ -$ -$ -$ 22,182$ 287,890.26$ 100% 1,142,000$ 1,142,000$ E-44MAYHILLMILLS MCKINNEY 1,955 PA (1/3) Widening 1,147,261$ 173,000$ 184,000$ -$ -$ -$ 40,154$ 521,134.69$ 100% 2,066,000$ 2,066,000$ E-45MAYHILLMCKINNEY MORSE 2,045 PA (1/3) Widening 1,200,076$ 181,000$ 193,000$ -$ -$ -$ 42,003$ 545,125.55$ 100% 2,161,000$ 2,161,000$ E-46MAYHILLMORSE SPENCER 3,520 PA (1/3) Widening 2,065,656$ 310,000$ 331,000$ -$ -$ -$ 72,298$ 938,309.01$ 100% 3,717,000$ 3,717,000$ E-47MAYHILLSPENCER EDWARDS 3,185 PA (1/3) Widening 1,869,067$ 281,000$ 300,000$ -$ 500,000.00$ -$ 65,417$ 849,009.71$ 100% 3,864,000$ 3,864,000$ E-48MAYHILL2725' N OF COLORADO COLORADO 2,725 PA (1/3) New 1,599,123$ 240,000$ 256,000$ 1,200,000$ 400,000.00$ -$ 55,969$ 726,389.79$ 100% 4,477,000$ 4,477,000$ E-49MAYHILLCOLORADO IH 35E 2,330 PA (1/3) Widening 1,367,324$ 206,000$ 219,000$ -$ -$ -$ 47,856$ -$ 100% 1,840,000$ 1,840,000$ E-50MAYHILL CONNECTORMAYHILL QUAILCREEK 700 PA New 1,539,076$ 231,000$ 247,000$ -$ -$ -$ 53,868$ -$ 100% 2,071,000$ 2,071,000$ E-51MOCKINGBIRDMCKINNEY 625' N OF DUCHESS 855 C New 904,400$ 136,000$ 145,000$ -$ -$ -$ 31,654$ -$ 100% 1,217,000$ 1,217,000$ E-52MOCKINGBIRDDUCHESS SHADY OAKS 2,170 SA New 3,865,051$ 580,000$ 619,000$ -$ 400,000.00$ 1,440,000.00$ 135,277$ -$ 100% 7,039,000$ 7,039,000$ E-53MOCKINGBIRDSHADY OAKS SPENCER 2,805 SA New 4,996,069$ 750,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ 174,862$ -$ 100% 6,721,000$ 6,721,000$ E-54POST OAKMILLS SPENCER 6,840 PA New 15,038,971$ 2,256,000$ 2,407,000$ -$ -$ -$ 526,364$ -$ 100% 20,228,000$ 20,228,000$ E-55POST OAK TREATMENT PLANT EDWARDS 6,685 PA New 14,698,176$ 2,205,000$ 2,352,000$ -$ -$ 1,755,000.00$ 514,436$ -$ 100% 21,525,000$ 21,525,000$ E-56POST OAKEDWARDS POCKRUS PAGE 2,710 PA New 5,958,423$ 894,000$ 954,000$ -$ -$ -$ 208,545$ -$ 100% 8,015,000$ 8,015,000$ E-57SWISHEREDWARDS POCKRUS PAGE 2,635 C New 2,787,244$ 419,000$ 446,000$ -$ -$ -$ 97,554$ -$ 100% 3,750,000$ 3,750,000$ E-58TEASLEYDALLAS IH 35E 1,870 PA (1/3) Widening 1,097,380$ 165,000$ 176,000$ -$ 600,000.00$ -$ 38,408$ -$ 100% 2,077,000$ 2,077,000$ E-59N STARSPENCER ROY 1,705 C New 1,803,511$ 271,000$ 289,000$ -$ -$ -$ 63,123$ -$ 100% 2,427,000$ 2,427,000$ E-60ROYMAYHILL N STAR 1,120 C New 1,184,711$ 178,000$ 190,000$ -$ -$ -$ 41,465$ -$ 100% 1,594,000$ 1,594,000$ 317,633,000$ 305,523,500$ TOTALPrevious City ContributionCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyService Area E Impact Fee CIPTotal Cost Cost in Service AreaPercent in Service Area# Roadway NameLimits Length(FT)Railroad CrossingsIntersectionsStreams/Channel CrossingsRoadway Classification Roadway StatusCity of Denton2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Project Information Primary Arterial (New) PA 135 5,280 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No. Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 1 24,700 CY 18.00$ 444,600$ 2 47,000 SY 20.75$ 975,250$ 3 44,600 SY 80.00$ 3,568,000$ 4 95,100 SF 7.50$ 713,250$ 5 2,700 CY 45.00$ 121,500$ 6 24,100 SY 12.00$ 289,200$ 7 8,600 SY 80.00$ 688,000$ Paving Subtotal:6,799,800$ Major Construction Component Allowances: Allowance Item Cost √5% 339,500.00$ √2% 135,800.00$ √2% 135,800.00$ √2% 135,800.00$ √30% 2,036,700.00$ -$ -$ √Irrigation 3% 203,700.00$ √Illumination 7% 475,300.00$ √Water 10% 678,900.00$ √Sewer 10% 678,900.00$ √SWPPP 2% 135,800.00$ -$ Allowance Subtotal: 4,956,200$ Paving and Allowance SUBTOTAL: 11,756,000$ Subtotal Price per Lane Mile 1,960,000$ Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Allowance Item Cost 11,756,000$ 15% 1,764,000$ 16% 1,881,000$ 3.5% 412,000$ Roadway Cost TOTAL: 15,813,000$ Price per Linear Foot (PA): 3,000$ Price per Lane Mile 2,636,000$ 12' Wide Turn Lane (300 LF Long) 2022 Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Concrete Driveways Pavement Markings/Signs Roadway Drainage Driveways (Every 100') Notes: Maintain Existing Traffic Standard Internal System Mobilization Removals/Prepare Right-of-Way Only for Reconstruction City of Denton Notes: Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Length (feet): Unclassified Street Earthwork Item Description Kimley-Horn Street Name: Limits: ROW Width (feet): Classification: NOTE: The planning level cost projections provided have been developed for the Denton Mobility Plan, and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Denton. No Engineering evaluation was used in the development of the costs. Generic costs and percentages were developed for paving unit prices, allowances, intersections, drainage crossings, and railroad crossings. Percentages have also been provided for contingencies/ROW, Engineering/Survey/SUE, Inspections/Material Testing, and Staff Time. The costs and percentages are based on the information known to the Engineer at this time and represent only the Engineer's judgement as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. The Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construciton costs will not vary from its opinions of probable costs. Notes Construction Item Description Construction Contingency/Right-of-Way Engineering/Survey/SUE Inspections/Material Testing Railroad Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment Intersections Priced Per Roadway Segment Streams/Channel Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment 12" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 46#/sy) 11" Concrete Pavement and Curb Other: Basic Street Light Foundations and Conduit 4" Topsoil Block Sodding Minor Adjustments Minor Adjustments Item Description 8' Concrete Sidewalk and 10' Concrete Trail (6" Depth) Traffic Control City of Denton 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Project Information Primary Arterial (Widening) PA 135 5,280 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 1 24,700 CY 18.00$ 444,600$ 2 47,000 SY 20.75$ 975,250$ 3 44,600 SY 80.00$ 3,568,000$ 4 95,100 SF 7.50$ 713,250$ 5 2,700 CY 45.00$ 121,500$ 6 24,100 SY 12.00$ 289,200$ 7 8,600 SY 80.00$ 688,000$ Paving Subtotal:6,799,800$ Major Construction Component Allowances: Allowance Item Cost √5% 339,500.00$ √10% 678,900.00$ √10% 678,900.00$ √2% 135,800.00$ √30% 2,036,700.00$ √5,000.00$ 528,000.00$ √Irrigation 3% 203,700.00$ √Illumination 7% 475,300.00$ √Water 10% 678,900.00$ √Sewer 10% 678,900.00$ √SWPPP 4% 271,600.00$ -$ Allowance Subtotal: 6,706,200$ Paving and Allowance SUBTOTAL: 13,506,000$ Subtotal Price per Lane Mile 2,251,000$ Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Allowance Item Cost 13,506,000$ 15% 2,026,000$ 16% 2,161,000$ 3.5% 473,000$ Roadway Cost TOTAL: 18,166,000$ Price per Linear Foot (PA): 3,500$ Price per Lane Mile 3,028,000$ Minor Adjustments Minor Adjustments Other: 2022 Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System Concrete Driveways Driveways (Every 100') Basic Street Light Foundations and Conduit Removals/Prepare Right-of-Way Only for Reconstruction Traffic Control Maintain Existing Traffic Pavement Markings/Signs 12' Wide Turn Lane (300 LF Long) Item Description Notes: Mobilization Limits: ROW Width (feet): Length (feet): Classification: City of Denton Kimley-Horn Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Street Name: Notes: NOTE: The planning level cost projections provided have been developed for the Denton Mobility Plan, and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Denton. No Engineering evaluation was used in the development of the costs. Generic costs and percentages were developed for paving unit prices, allowances, intersections, drainage crossings, and railroad crossings. Percentages have also been provided for contingencies/ROW, Engineering/Survey/SUE, Inspections/Material Testing, and Staff Time. The costs and percentages are based on the information known to the Engineer at this time and represent only the Engineer's judgement as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. The Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construciton costs will not vary from its opinions of probable costs. Intersections Priced Per Roadway Segment Streams/Channel Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment Engineering/Survey/SUE Inspections/Material Testing Railroad Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment 4" Topsoil Item Description Unclassified Street Earthwork Item Description Notes Construction Construction Contingency/Right-of-Way 12" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 46#/sy) 11" Concrete Pavement and Curb 8' Concrete Sidewalk and 10' Concrete Trail (6" Depth) Block Sodding City of Denton 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Project Information Primary Arterial (Half Roadway) PA (4/6) 135 5,280 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 1 16,600 CY 18.00$ 298,800$ 2 31,400 SY 20.75$ 651,550$ 3 29,700 SY 80.00$ 2,376,000$ 4 52,800 SF 7.50$ 396,000$ 5 2,200 CY 45.00$ 99,000$ 6 19,400 SY 12.00$ 232,800$ 7 8,600 SY 80.00$ 688,000$ Paving Subtotal:4,742,150$ Major Construction Component Allowances: Allowance Item Cost √5% 236,400.00$ √5% 236,400.00$ √5% 236,400.00$ √2% 94,600.00$ √20% 945,600.00$ √5,000.00$ 264,000.00$ √Irrigation 3% 141,900.00$ √Illumination 3% 141,900.00$ √Water 3% 141,900.00$ √Sewer 3% 141,900.00$ √SWPPP 4% 189,200.00$ -$ Allowance Subtotal: 2,770,200$ Paving and Allowance SUBTOTAL: 7,513,000$ Subtotal Price per Lane Mile 1,879,000$ Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Allowance Item Cost 7,513,000$ 15% 1,127,000$ 16% 1,203,000$ 3.5% 263,000$ Roadway Cost TOTAL: 10,106,000$ Price per Linear Foot (PA): 2,000$ Price per Lane Mile 2,527,000$ Minor Adjustments Minor Adjustments Other: 2020 Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System Concrete Driveways Driveways (Every 100') Basic Street Light Foundations and Conduit Removals/Prepare Right-of-Way Only for Reconstruction Traffic Control Maintain Existing Traffic Pavement Markings/Signs 12' Wide Turn Lane (300 LF Long) Item Description Notes: Mobilization Limits: ROW Width (feet): Length (feet): Classification: City of Denton Kimley-Horn Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Street Name: Notes: NOTE: The planning level cost projections provided have been developed for the Denton Mobility Plan, and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Denton. No Engineering evaluation was used in the development of the costs. Generic costs and percentages were developed for paving unit prices, allowances, intersections, drainage crossings, and railroad crossings. Percentages have also been provided for contingencies/ROW, Engineering/Survey/SUE, Inspections/Material Testing, and Staff Time. The costs and percentages are based on the information known to the Engineer at this time and represent only the Engineer's judgement as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. The Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construciton costs will not vary from its opinions of probable costs. Intersections Priced Per Roadway Segment Streams/Channel Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment Engineering/Survey/SUE Inspections/Material Testing Railroad Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment 4" Topsoil Item Description Unclassified Street Earthwork Item Description Notes Construction Construction Contingency/Right-of-Way 12" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 46#/sy) 11" Concrete Pavement and Curb 10' Concrete Trail (6" Depth) Block Sodding City of Denton 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Project Information Primary Arterial (Median Lanes) PA (1/3) 135 5,280 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 1 7,400 CY 18.00$ 133,200$ 2 5,300 SY 20.75$ 109,975$ 3 14,700 SY 80.00$ 1,176,000$ 4 0 SF 7.50$ -$ 5 700 CY 45.00$ 31,500$ 6 5,900 SY 12.00$ 70,800$ 7 8,600 SY 80.00$ 688,000$ Paving Subtotal:2,209,475$ Major Construction Component Allowances: Allowance Item Cost √5% 109,900.00$ √2% 44,000.00$ √10% 219,800.00$ √2% 44,000.00$ √10% 219,800.00$ -$ -$ √Irrigation 3% 66,000.00$ √Illumination 3% 66,000.00$ √Water 3% 66,000.00$ √Sewer 3% 66,000.00$ √SWPPP 4% 88,000.00$ -$ Allowance Subtotal: 989,500$ Paving and Allowance SUBTOTAL: 3,199,000$ Subtotal Price per Lane Mile 1,600,000$ Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Allowance Item Cost 3,199,000$ 15% 480,000$ 16% 512,000$ 3.5% 112,000$ Roadway Cost TOTAL: 4,303,000$ Price per Linear Foot (PA): 900$ Price per Lane Mile 2,152,000$ Minor Adjustments Minor Adjustments Other: 2020 Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System Concrete Driveways Driveways (Every 100') Basic Street Light Foundations and Conduit Removals/Prepare Right-of-Way Only for Reconstruction Traffic Control Maintain Existing Traffic Pavement Markings/Signs 12' Wide Turn Lane (300 LF Long) Item Description Notes: Mobilization Limits: ROW Width (feet): Length (feet): Classification: City of Denton Kimley-Horn Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Street Name: Notes: NOTE: The planning level cost projections provided have been developed for the Denton Mobility Plan, and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Denton. No Engineering evaluation was used in the development of the costs. Generic costs and percentages were developed for paving unit prices, allowances, intersections, drainage crossings, and railroad crossings. Percentages have also been provided for contingencies/ROW, Engineering/Survey/SUE, Inspections/Material Testing, and Staff Time. The costs and percentages are based on the information known to the Engineer at this time and represent only the Engineer's judgement as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. The Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construciton costs will not vary from its opinions of probable costs. Intersections Priced Per Roadway Segment Streams/Channel Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment Engineering/Survey/SUE Inspections/Material Testing Railroad Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment 4" Topsoil Item Description Unclassified Street Earthwork Item Description Notes Construction Construction Contingency/Right-of-Way 12" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 46#/sy) 11" Concrete Pavement and Curb No Sidewalk - Median Widening Block Sodding City of Denton 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Project Information Secondary Arterial (New) SA 110 5,280 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No. Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 1 22,300 CY 18.00$ 401,400$ 2 42,300 SY 20.75$ 877,725$ 3 39,900 SY 80.00$ 3,192,000$ 4 63,400 SF 6.50$ 412,100$ 5 2,100 CY 45.00$ 94,500$ 6 18,800 SY 12.00$ 225,600$ 7 6,400 SY 80.00$ 512,000$ Paving Subtotal:5,715,325$ Major Construction Component Allowances: Allowance Item Cost √5% 260,100.00$ √2% 104,100.00$ √2% 104,100.00$ √2% 104,100.00$ √30% 1,560,100.00$ -$ -$ √Irrigation 3% 156,100.00$ √Illumination 7% 364,100.00$ √Water 10% 520,100.00$ √Sewer 10% 520,100.00$ √SWPPP 2% 104,100.00$ -$ Allowance Subtotal: 3,797,000$ Paving and Allowance SUBTOTAL: 9,513,000$ Subtotal Price per Lane Mile 2,379,000$ Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Allowance Item Cost 9,513,000$ 15% 1,427,000$ 16% 1,523,000$ 3.5% 333,000$ Roadway Cost TOTAL: 12,796,000$ Price per Linear Foot (PA): 2,500$ Price per Lane Mile 3,199,000$ Minor Adjustments Minor Adjustments Other: 2022 Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System Concrete Driveways Driveways (Every 100') Basic Street Light Foundations and Conduit Removals/Prepare Right-of-Way Only for Reconstruction Traffic Control Maintain Existing Traffic Pavement Markings/Signs 12' Wide Turn Lane (200 LF Long) Item Description Notes: Mobilization Limits: ROW Width (feet): Length (feet): Classification: City of Denton Kimley-Horn Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Street Name: Notes: NOTE: The planning level cost projections provided have been developed for the Denton Mobility Plan, and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Denton. No Engineering evaluation was used in the development of the costs. Generic costs and percentages were developed for paving unit prices, allowances, intersections, drainage crossings, and railroad crossings. Percentages have also been provided for contingencies/ROW, Engineering/Survey/SUE, Inspections/Material Testing, and Staff Time. The costs and percentages are based on the information known to the Engineer at this time and represent only the Engineer's judgement as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. The Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construciton costs will not vary from its opinions of probable costs. Intersections Priced Per Roadway Segment Streams/Channel Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment Engineering/Survey/SUE Inspections/Material Testing Railroad Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment 4" Topsoil Item Description Unclassified Street Earthwork Item Description Notes Construction Construction Contingency/Right-of-Way 12" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 46#/sy) 11" Concrete Pavement and Curb 6' Concrete Sidewalk (4" Depth) Block Sodding City of Denton 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Project Information Secondary Arterial (Widening) SA 110 5,280 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 1 22,300 CY 18.00$ 401,400$ 2 42,300 SY 20.75$ 877,725$ 3 39,900 SY 80.00$ 3,192,000$ 4 63,400 SF 6.50$ 412,100$ 5 2,100 CY 45.00$ 94,500$ 6 18,800 SY 12.00$ 225,600$ 7 6,400 SY 80.00$ 512,000$ Paving Subtotal:5,715,325$ Major Construction Component Allowances: Allowance Item Cost √5% 285,700.00$ √10% 571,300.00$ √10% 571,300.00$ √2% 114,300.00$ √30% 1,713,700.00$ √5,000.00$ 528,000.00$ √Irrigation 3% 171,400.00$ √Illumination 7% 399,900.00$ √Water 10% 571,300.00$ √Sewer 10% 571,300.00$ √SWPPP 4% 228,500.00$ -$ Allowance Subtotal: 5,726,700$ Paving and Allowance SUBTOTAL: 11,443,000$ Subtotal Price per Lane Mile 2,861,000$ Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Allowance Item Cost 11,443,000$ 15% 1,717,000$ 16% 1,831,000$ 3.5% 401,000$ Roadway Cost TOTAL: 15,392,000$ Price per Linear Foot (PA): 3,000$ Price per Lane Mile 3,848,000$ Minor Adjustments Minor Adjustments Other: 2022 Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System Concrete Driveways Driveways (Every 100') Basic Street Light Foundations and Conduit Removals/Prepare Right-of-Way Only for Reconstruction Traffic Control Maintain Existing Traffic Pavement Markings/Signs 12' Wide Turn Lane (200 LF Long) Item Description Notes: Mobilization Limits: ROW Width (feet): Length (feet): Classification: City of Denton Kimley-Horn Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Street Name: Notes: NOTE: The planning level cost projections provided have been developed for the Denton Mobility Plan, and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Denton. No Engineering evaluation was used in the development of the costs. Generic costs and percentages were developed for paving unit prices, allowances, intersections, drainage crossings, and railroad crossings. Percentages have also been provided for contingencies/ROW, Engineering/Survey/SUE, Inspections/Material Testing, and Staff Time. The costs and percentages are based on the information known to the Engineer at this time and represent only the Engineer's judgement as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. The Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construciton costs will not vary from its opinions of probable costs. Intersections Priced Per Roadway Segment Streams/Channel Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment Engineering/Survey/SUE Inspections/Material Testing Railroad Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment 4" Topsoil Item Description Unclassified Street Earthwork Item Description Notes Construction Construction Contingency/Right-of-Way 12" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 46#/sy) 11" Concrete Pavement and Curb 6' Concrete Sidewalk (4" Depth) Block Sodding City of Denton 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Project Information Secondary Arterial (Half Roadway) SA (1/2) 110 5,280 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 1 11,200 CY 18.00$ 201,600$ 2 21,200 SY 20.75$ 439,900$ 3 20,000 SY 80.00$ 1,600,000$ 4 31,700 SF 6.50$ 206,050$ 5 1,700 CY 45.00$ 76,500$ 6 14,700 SY 12.00$ 176,400$ 7 6,400 SY 80.00$ 512,000$ Paving Subtotal:3,212,450$ Major Construction Component Allowances: Allowance Item Cost √5% 160,100.00$ √5% 160,100.00$ √5% 160,100.00$ √2% 64,100.00$ √20% 640,400.00$ √5,000.00$ 264,000.00$ √Irrigation 3% 96,100.00$ √Illumination 3% 96,100.00$ √Water 3% 96,100.00$ √Sewer 3% 96,100.00$ √SWPPP 4% 128,100.00$ -$ Allowance Subtotal: 1,961,300$ Paving and Allowance SUBTOTAL: 5,174,000$ Subtotal Price per Lane Mile 2,587,000$ Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Allowance Item Cost 5,174,000$ 15% 777,000$ 16% 828,000$ 3.5% 182,000$ Roadway Cost TOTAL: 6,961,000$ Price per Linear Foot (PA): 1,400$ Price per Lane Mile 3,481,000$ Minor Adjustments Minor Adjustments Other: 2020 Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System Concrete Driveways Driveways (Every 100') Basic Street Light Foundations and Conduit Removals/Prepare Right-of-Way Only for Reconstruction Traffic Control Maintain Existing Traffic Pavement Markings/Signs 12' Wide Turn Lane (200 LF Long) Item Description Notes: Mobilization Limits: ROW Width (feet): Length (feet): Classification: City of Denton Kimley-Horn Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Street Name: Notes: NOTE: The planning level cost projections provided have been developed for the Denton Mobility Plan, and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Denton. No Engineering evaluation was used in the development of the costs. Generic costs and percentages were developed for paving unit prices, allowances, intersections, drainage crossings, and railroad crossings. Percentages have also been provided for contingencies/ROW, Engineering/Survey/SUE, Inspections/Material Testing, and Staff Time. The costs and percentages are based on the information known to the Engineer at this time and represent only the Engineer's judgement as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. The Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construciton costs will not vary from its opinions of probable costs. Intersections Priced Per Roadway Segment Streams/Channel Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment Engineering/Survey/SUE Inspections/Material Testing Railroad Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment 4" Topsoil Item Description Unclassified Street Earthwork Item Description Notes Construction Construction Contingency/Right-of-Way 12" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 46#/sy) 11" Concrete Pavement and Curb 6' Concrete Sidewalk (4" Depth) Block Sodding City of Denton 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Project Information Collector (New) C 65 5,280 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No. Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost 1 13,200 CY 18.00$ 237,600$ 2 25,300 SY 20.75$ 524,975$ 3 24,100 SY 70.00$ 1,687,000$ 4 52,800 SF 6.50$ 343,200$ 5 1,000 CY 45.00$ 45,000$ 6 8,800 SY 12.00$ 105,600$ 7 4,700 SY 70.00$ 329,000$ Paving Subtotal:3,272,375$ Major Construction Component Allowances: Allowance Item Cost √5% 163,400.00$ √2% 65,400.00$ √2% 65,400.00$ √2% 65,400.00$ √30% 979,900.00$ -$ -$ √Irrigation 3% 98,000.00$ √Illumination 7% 228,700.00$ √Water 10% 326,700.00$ √Sewer 10% 326,700.00$ √SWPPP 2% 65,400.00$ -$ Allowance Subtotal: 2,385,000$ Paving and Allowance SUBTOTAL: 5,658,000$ Subtotal Price per Lane Mile 2,829,000$ Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Allowance Item Cost 5,658,000$ 15% 849,000$ 16% 906,000$ 3.5% 199,000$ Roadway Cost TOTAL: 7,612,000$ Price per Linear Foot (PA): 1,500$ Price per Lane Mile 3,806,000$ Minor Adjustments Minor Adjustments Other: 2022 Denton Mobility Plan - Roadway Costing Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System Concrete Driveways Driveways (Every 100') Basic Street Light Foundations and Conduit Removals/Prepare Right-of-Way Only for Reconstruction Traffic Control Maintain Existing Traffic Pavement Markings/Signs Parking Lane Item Description Notes: Mobilization Limits: ROW Width (feet): Length (feet): Classification: City of Denton Kimley-Horn Planning Level Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Street Name: Notes: NOTE: The planning level cost projections provided have been developed for the Denton Mobility Plan, and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Denton. No Engineering evaluation was used in the development of the costs. Generic costs and percentages were developed for paving unit prices, allowances, intersections, drainage crossings, and railroad crossings. Percentages have also been provided for contingencies/ROW, Engineering/Survey/SUE, Inspections/Material Testing, and Staff Time. The costs and percentages are based on the information known to the Engineer at this time and represent only the Engineer's judgement as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. The Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construciton costs will not vary from its opinions of probable costs. Intersections Priced Per Roadway Segment Streams/Channel Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment Engineering/Survey/SUE Inspections/Material Testing Railroad Crossings Priced Per Roadway Segment 4" Topsoil Item Description Unclassified Street Earthwork Item Description Notes Construction Construction Contingency/Right-of-Way 8" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 46#/sy) 8" Concrete Pavement and Curb 5' Concrete Sidewalk (4" Depth) Block Sodding City of Denton 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas Appendix B – Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Supply Service Area A5/14/2024VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESSLENGTHLENGTHMTPROADWAYCAPACITYSUPPLYTOTALCAPACITY(FT) (MI) CLASSIFICATIONSTATUSPK-HRPK-HRDEMANDPK-HRPER LNTOTAL1PK-HR2VEH-MI3A-1 CORBIN IH-35W CORBIN 3,055 0.58 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 9 100% 750 1740 5 173510,164,000$ 10,164,000.00$ A-2 CORBIN 500' S OF SPRINGSIDE CORBIN 1,410 0.27 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 810 0 8103,378,000$ 3,378,000.00$ A-3 FM 1515 IH 35W CORBIN 5,990 1.13 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 761 100% 850 5763 860 4,90323,533,000$ 23,533,000$ A-4 FM 1515 CORBIN WESTERN 1,175 0.22 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 460 100% 850 1122 101 1,0213,959,000$ 3,959,000$ A-5 FM 1515 WESTERN WESTCOURT 1,555 0.29 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1,120 100% 850 1479 325 1,1547,495,000$ 7,495,000$ A-6 FM 1515 WESTCOURT MASCH BRANCH 620 0.12 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 552 100% 850 612 66 5462,089,000$ 2,089,000$ A-7 FM 1515 TOM COLE 3435' W OF TOM COLE 3,435 0.65 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 663 100% 850 3315 431 2,88413,827,000$ 13,827,000$ A-8 FM 1515 3435' W OF TOM COLE 530' E OF C WOLFE 3,750 0.71 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 619 100% 850 3621 439 3,18213,132,000$ 13,132,000$ A-9 H LIVELY C WOLFE 2145' W OF H LIVELY 2,145 0.41 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 48 50% 850 1046 10 1,0367,226,000$ 3,613,000$ A-10 H LIVELY 2145' W OF H LIVELY 2150' W OF ED ROBSON 3,915 0.74 2 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 234 100% 850 1258 173 1,08513,188,000$ 13,188,000$ A-11 IH-35-CORBIN IH-35 CORBIN 4,420 0.84 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 924 0 9247,040,000$ 7,040,000$ A-12 JIM CHRISTAL IH 35 OLD SH 24 3,110 0.59 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,290 100% 750 1770 761 1,00910,332,000$ 10,332,000$ A-13,C-10 JIM CHRISTAL OLD SH 24 WESTERN 2,905 0.55 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,056 50% 750 825 290 5359,746,000$ 4,873,000$ A-14,C-11 JIM CHRISTAL WESTERN MASCH BRANCH 3,510 0.66 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 910 50% 750 990 300 69011,964,000$ 5,982,000$ A-15,C-12 JIM CHRISTAL MASCH BRANCH THOMAS J EGAN 5,975 1.13 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 239 50% 750 1695 135 1,56018,502,000$ 9,251,000$ A-16,C-13 JIM CHRISTAL THOMAS J EGAN 515' E OF C WOLFE 3,945 0.75 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 239 50% 750 1125 90 1,03512,707,000$ 6,353,500$ A-17 PRECISION-WESTERN PRECISION WESTERN 3,420 0.65 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 715 0 7156,566,000$ 6,566,000$ A-18 ROBSON RANCH IH 35W ED ROBSON 8,720 1.65 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 808 50% 850 4208 667 3,54130,974,000$ 15,487,000$ A-19 ROBSON RANCH ED ROBSON YARBROUGH 7,150 1.35 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 627 50% 850 3443 423 3,02025,335,000$ 12,667,500$ A-20 SPRINGSIDE CORBIN UNDERWOOD 1,835 0.35 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 620 100% 750 1050 217 8336,141,000$ 6,141,000$ A-21 SPRINGSIDE UNDERWOOD WESTCOURT 865 0.16 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 31 100% 750 480 5 4752,971,000$ 2,971,000$ A-22 TJ EGAN-LOOP 288 LOOP 288 2440' W OF LOOP 288 2,440 0.46 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 506 0 5063,722,000$ 3,722,000$ A-23 C WOLFE 1140' S OF TOM COLE FM 2449 7,270 1.38 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 225 50% 850 3519 155 3,36426,240,000$ 13,120,000$ A-24 C WOLFE FM 2449 H LIVELY 3,315 0.63 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 964 50% 850 1607 304 1,30312,018,000$ 6,009,000$ A-25 CORBIN IH-35-CORBIN SPRINGSIDE 2,050 0.39 2 COLLECTOR C Widening 620 100% 550 429 242 1873,667,000$ 3,667,000$ A-26 J CHRISTAL-H LIVELY FM 2449 H LIVELY 3,305 0.63 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 693 0 6935,353,000$ 5,353,000$ A-27 PRECISION JIM CHRISTAL 1635' N OF FM 1515 2,385 0.45 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 495 0 4953,694,000$ 3,694,000$ A-28 THOMAS J EGAN JIM CHRISTAL 2915' S OF JIM CRISTAL 2,915 0.55 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1650 0 1,6506,984,000$ 6,984,000$ A-29 THOMAS J EGAN 1830' N OF FM 1515 FM 1515 1,830 0.35 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 50% 750 525 0 5254,635,000$ 2,317,500$ A-30 UNDERWOOD SPRINGSIDE UNDERWOOD CONNECTOR 4,000 0.76 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 692 100% 850 3876 526 3,35015,229,000$ 15,229,000$ A-31 WESTCOURT FM 1515 SPRINGSIDE 4,165 0.79 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA (1/2) Widening 552 100% 750 2370 436 1,9345,343,000$ 5,343,000$ A-32 WESTERN JIM CHRISTAL AIRPORT 6,485 1.23 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 253 100% 850 6273 311 5,9626,619,000$ 6,619,000$ A-33WESTERNFM 1515SPRINGSIDE4,1750.796PRIMARY ARTERIALPANewNew100%850402904,02914,102,000$ 14,102,000$ AMYX LOOP 288 C WOLFE 6,855 1.30 2 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1950 0 1,950-$ -$ FM 2449 LOOP 288 780' W OF LOOP 288 778 0.15 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 765 0 765-$ -$ FM 2449 780' W OF LOOP 288 4380' E OF C WOLFE 1,904 0.36 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 1836 0 1,836-$ -$ FM 2449 4380' E OF C WOLFE C WOLFE 4,382 0.83 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1364 100% 850 4233 1132 3,101-$ -$ FM 2499 OUTER LOOP UNDERWOOD 5,687 1.08 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 1188 0 1,188-$ -$ H LIVELY I-35W C WOLFE 14,275 2.70 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 30% 850 4131 0 4,131-$ -$ AMYX-H LIVELY AMYX H LIVELY 9,395 1.78 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 1958 0 1,958-$ -$ FM 1515-H LIVELY FM 1515 H LIVELY 12,255 2.32 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 6960 0 6,960-$ -$ HUNTER ARTERIAL FM 2449 UNDERWOOD 10,451 1.98 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 50% 750 2970 0 2,970-$ -$ HUNTER COLLECTOR HUNTER ARTERIAL UNDERWOOD 11,391 2.16 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 2376 0 2,376-$ -$ HUNTER COLLECTOR A HUNTER ARTERIAL ROBSON RANCH 13,264 2.51 6 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 8283 0 8,283-$ -$ HUNTER COLLECTOR C HUNTER COLLECTOR A HUNTER COLLECTOR B 2,886 0.55 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 605 0 605-$ -$ UNDERWOOD UNDERWOOD CONNECTOR FM 2449 2,026 0.38 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 1938 0 1,938-$ -$ UNDERWOOD LOOP 288 1610' N OF H LIVELY 5,909 1.12 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 60 100% 850 5712 67 5,645-$ -$ UNDERWOOD 1610' N OF H LIVELY H LIVELY 1,608 0.30 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 1530 0 1,530-$ -$ UNDERWOODH LIVELYROBSON RANCH12,0392.286SECONDARY ARTERIALSANewNew100%75010260010,260-$ -$ 120,6588,471112,187347,875,000$ 268,201,500$ 2022 Roadway Impact Impact Fee Cost per Service Area 37,660$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA A268,239,160$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area]2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area]3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total]Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280].SUBTOTALLIMITSFROM TOCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCIP Service Units of SupplyProject ID #ROADWAYLANESIMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATIONPEAK HOUR VOLUME% IN SERVICE AREATOTAL PROJECT COSTTOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREAROADWAYS BEING PROVIDED BY HUNTER RANCH AND COLE RANCH WITHOUT CITY PARTICIPATION 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix B - Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy Service Area B5/14/2024VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESSLENGTHLENGTHMTPROADWAYCAPACITYSUPPLYTOTALCAPACITY(FT) (MI) CLASSIFICATIONSTATUSPK-HRPK-HRDEMANDPK-HRPER LNTOTAL1PK-HR2VEH-MI3B-1 ALLRED BONNIE BRAE BRUSH CREEK 4,285 0.81 2 COLLECTOR C Widening 13 50% 550 446 5 4416,097,000$ 3,048,500$ B-2 ALLRED BRUSH CREEK JOHN PAINE 1,610 0.30 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1,171 50% 850 765 176 5895,424,000$ 2,712,000.00$ B-3 BRUSH CREEK 815' E OF COUNTRY CLUB COUNTRY CLUB 815 0.15 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 2,261 100% 850 765 339 4262,747,000$ 2,747,000$ B-4 BRUSH CREEK COUNTRY CLUB 1935' W OF COUNTRY CLUB 1,935 0.37 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 299 100% 850 1887 111 1,7766,769,000$ 6,769,000$ B-5 BRUSH CREEK 2180' E OF FORT WORTH FORT WORTH 2,180 0.41 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 299 100% 850 2091 123 1,9687,344,000$ 7,344,000$ B-6 BRUSH CREEK FORT WORTH 590' E OF ALLRED 3,615 0.68 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 3468 0 3,46810,698,000$ 10,698,000$ B-7 CORBIN BONNIE BRAE IH-35W 3,505 0.66 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 9 100% 750 1980 6 1,97410,760,000$ 10,760,000$ B-8 CREEKDALE PIMLICO RIVERCHASE 3,230 0.61 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 671 0 6715,346,000$ 5,346,000$ B-9 CREEKDALE THISTLE WAY OAKBLUFF 2,080 0.39 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 429 0 4293,461,000$ 3,461,000$ B-10 EL PASEO BELMONT COUNTRY CLUB 1,910 0.36 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 396 0 3963,369,000$ 3,369,000$ B-11 FM 1515 BONNIE BRAE IH 35W 770 0.15 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1,974 100% 850 765 296 4692,595,000$ 2,595,000$ B-12 HICKORY CREEK FM 2499 NAUTICA 1,175 0.22 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 2,942 100% 850 1122 647 4751,605,000$ 1,605,000$ B-13 HICKORY CREEK NAUTICA TEASLEY 1,310 0.25 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 2,942 100% 850 1275 735 5401,789,000$ 1,789,000$ B-14 HICKORY CREEK TEASLEY MONTECITO 4,475 0.85 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 436 100% 850 4335 371 3,9648,638,000$ 8,638,000$ B-15 HICKORY CREEK MONTECITO 1435' W OF BIDDY BYE 2,230 0.42 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 2,261 50% 850 1071 475 5964,006,000$ 2,003,000$ B-16 HICKORY CREEK 1435' W OF BIDDY BYE 815' E OF COUNTRY CLUB 1,980 0.38 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 1938 0 1,9387,612,000$ 7,612,000$ B-17 HOBSON LANE TEASLEY MONTECITO 670 0.13 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 555 100% 750 390 72 3181,914,000$ 1,914,000$ B-18 HOBSON LANE MONTECITO FORRESTRIDGE 1,495 0.28 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 552 100% 750 840 155 6855,710,000$ 5,710,000$ B-19 HOBSON LANE FORRESTRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 3,785 0.72 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 249 100% 750 2160 179 1,98111,559,000$ 11,559,000$ B-20 PARVIN MCCORMICK HIGHLAND PARK 2,665 0.50 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 550 0 5502,150,000$ 2,150,000$ B-21 ROBINSON 230' E OF WHEELER RIDGE TEASLEY 2,735 0.524 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,188 100% 750 1560 618 9428,061,000$ 8,061,000$ B-22 RYAN TEASLEY MONTECITO 4,020 0.76 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 755 100% 750 2280 574 1,70611,980,000$ 11,980,000$ B-23 RYAN MONTECITO FORRESTRIDGE 3,305 0.63 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 552 100% 750 1890 348 1,54210,878,000$ 10,878,000$ B-24 RYAN FORRESTRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 3,475 0.66 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 45 100% 750 1980 30 1,95010,824,000$ 10,824,000$ B-25 VINTAGE FORT WORTH BONNIE BRAE 4,605 0.87 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 423 100% 850 4437 368 4,06911,721,000$ 11,721,000$ B-26 VINTAGE BONNIE BRAE NAPA VALLEY 765 0.14 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 1,874 100% 850 714 262 4521,665,000$ 1,665,000$ B-27 VINTAGE NAPA VALLEY IH 35W 3,435 0.65 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 1,874 100% 850 3315 1218 2,0977,975,000$ 7,975,000$ B-28 WILLOWWOOD 1250' W OF HIGHLAND PARK BONNIE BRAE 1,285 0.24 2 COLLECTOR C Widening 1,039 100% 550 264 249 152,079,000$ 2,079,000$ B-29 BONNIE BRAE IH 35E FM 1515 725 0.14 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 2,992 100% 750 420 419 11,285,000$ 1,285,000$ B-30 BONNIE BRAE FM 1515 WILLOWWOOD 5,740 1.09 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 2,003 100% 750 3270 2183 1,08711,351,000$ 11,351,000$ B-31 BONNIE BRAE HIGHLAND PARK ROSELAWN 2,550 0.48 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 50% 750 720 0 7204,521,000$ 2,260,500$ B-32 COUNTRY CLUB FORT WORTH HOBSON 430 0.08 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,436 100% 750 240 115 1251,229,000$ 1,229,000$ B-33 COUNTRY CLUB HOBSON RYAN 5,285 1.00 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,284 100% 750 3000 1284 1,71615,093,000$ 15,093,000$ B-34 COUNTRY CLUB RYAN HICKORY CREEK 3,485 0.66 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 552 50% 750 990 182 80811,902,000$ 5,951,000$ B-35 FORT WORTH COUNTRY CLUB VINTAGE 6,965 1.32 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 2,741 100% 850 6732 3618 3,11426,417,000$ 26,417,000$ B-36 FORT WORTH VINTAGE BONNIE BRAE 5,655 1.07 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 2,398 100% 850 5457 2566 2,89119,299,000$ 19,299,000$ B-37 FORT WORTH BONNIE BRAE BRUSH CREEK 1,250 0.24 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 4,723 100% 850 1224 1134 904,811,000$ 4,811,000$ B-38 FORT WORTH BRUSH CREEK CRAWFORD 5,845 1.11 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 3,590 100% 850 5661 3985 1,67620,190,000$ 20,190,000$ B-39 JOHN PAINE JOHNSON ATHENS 2,210 0.42 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL Completed Widening 1,280 100% 750 1260 538 722238,000$ 238,000$ B-40 JOHN PAINE VINTAGE 1045' S OF VINTAGE 1,045 0.20 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 600 0 6003,254,000$ 3,254,000$ B-41 PARVIN-ROSELAWN PARVIN ROSELAWN 2,725 0.52 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 572 0 5723,878,000$ 3,878,000$ B-42 TEASLEY IH 35E LONDONDERRY 1,315 0.25 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 3,407 100% 850 1275 852 4231,039,000$ 1,039,000$ B-43 TEASLEY LONDONDERRY HOBSON 5,140 0.97 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 3,135 100% 850 4947 3041 1,9064,558,000$ 4,558,000$ B-44 TEASLEY LILLIAN B MILLER PENNSYLVANIA 1,890 0.36 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 3,217 100% 850 1836 1158 6781,493,000$ 1,493,000$ B-45TEASLEYPENNSYLVANIAHOBSON1,08506PRIMARY ARTERIALPA (1/3)Widening3,133100%8501071658413857,000$ 857,000$ ALLRED JOHN PAINE 365' W OF IH-35W 1,482 0.28 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1,308 100% 850 1428 366 1,062-$ -$ ALLRED 365' W OF IH-35W IH-35W 365 0.07 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1,438 100% 850 357 101 256-$ -$ JOHN PAINE VINTAGE ALLRED 6,370 1.21 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 3630 0 3,630-$ -$ JOHN PAINEALLREDTEXOMA2,6600.504SECONDARY ARTERIALSANewNew100%750150001,500-$ -$ 89,97429,55760,417306,191,000$ 290,216,000$ 2022 Roadway Impact Impact Fee Cost per Service Area 37,660$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA B290,253,660$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area]2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area]3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total]Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280].TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREAFROM TOSUBTOTALCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCIP Service Units of SupplyProject ID #ROADWAYLIMITSLANESIMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATIONPEAK HOUR VOLUME% IN SERVICE AREATOTAL PROJECT COSTROADWAYS BEING PROVIDED BY HUNTER RANCH AND COLE RANCH WITHOUT CITY PARTICIPATION 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix B - Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy Service Area C5/14/2024VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESSLENGTHLENGTHMTPROADWAYCAPACITYSUPPLYTOTALCAPACITY(FT) (MI) CLASSIFICATIONSTATUSPK-HRPK-HRDEMANDPK-HRPER LNTOTAL1PK-HR2VEH-MI3C-1 BARTHOLD MASCH BRANCH 5200' W OF IIH 35 5,195 0.98 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 250 50% 850 2499 123 2,37617,750,000$ 8,875,000$ C-2 BOBCAT FM 2164 IH-35 14,535 2.75 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 8250 0 825037,762,000$ 37,762,000.00$ C-3 FM 1173 IH 35 4605' W OF IH 35 4,605 0.87 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 648 100% 750 2610 564 204613,401,000$ 13,401,000.00$ C-4 FM 1173 4605' W OF IH 35 LOVERS 2,190 0.41 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 648 50% 750 615 133 4827,704,000$ 3,852,000$ C-5 FM 2164-IH 35 FM 2164 IH 35 14,425 2.73 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 8190 0 8,19037,057,000$ 37,057,000$ C-6 GANZER FM 2164 GANZER 12,680 2.40 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 12240 0 12,24039,748,000$ 39,748,000$ C-7 GANZER 2900' E OF IH 35 IH 35 2,900 0.55 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 229 100% 850 2805 126 2,67911,525,000$ 11,525,000$ C-8 GANZER 1620' E OF BARTHOLD BARTHOLD 1,620 0.31 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 175 50% 850 791 27 7645,708,000$ 2,854,000$ C-9 GANZER BARTHOLD RECTOR 2,585 0.49 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 74 50% 850 1250 18 1,2329,208,000$ 4,604,000$ A-13,C-10 JIM CHRISTAL OLD SH 24 WESTERN 2,905 0.55 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,056 50% 750 825 290 5359,746,000$ 4,873,000$ A-14,C-11 JIM CHRISTAL WESTERN MASCH BRANCH 3,510 0.66 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 910 50% 750 990 300 69011,964,000$ 5,982,000$ A-15,C-12 JIM CHRISTAL MASCH BRANCH THOMAS J EGAN 5,975 1.13 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 239 50% 750 1695 135 1,56018,502,000$ 9,251,000$ A-16,C-13 JIM CHRISTAL THOMAS J EGAN 515' E OF C WOLFE 3,945 0.75 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 239 50% 750 1125 90 1,03512,707,000$ 6,353,500$ C-14 JIM CHRISTAL 945' W OF C WOLFE NAIL 3,115 0.59 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 142 50% 750 885 42 8439,547,000$ 4,773,500$ C-15 JIM CHRISTAL NAIL 2045' W of Nail 2,045 0.39 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 119 50% 750 585 23 5625,841,000$ 2,920,500$ C-16 MARSHALL 2845' N OF HAMPTON HAMPTON 2,845 0.54 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 594 0 5945,249,000$ 5,249,000$ C-17 MARSHALL HAMPTON US 380 3,090 0.59 2 COLLECTOR C Widening 552 100% 550 649 326 3234,397,000$ 4,397,000$ C-18 MASCH BRANCH MASCH BRANCH DARBY SMITH 3,450 0.65 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 405 100% 750 1950 263 1,68710,602,000$ 10,602,000$ C-19 WESTWARD NORTHWAY BONNIE BRAE 1,175 0.22 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 242 0 2421,672,000$ 1,672,000$ C-20 RINEY US 77 2460' W OF US 77 2,460 0.47 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA (1/2) Widening 24 100% 750 1410 11 1,3993,156,000$ 3,156,000$ C-21 RINEY 2460' W OF US 77 BONNIE BRAE 980 0.19 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA (1/2) Widening 24 100% 750 570 4 5661,258,000$ 1,258,000$ C-22 US 77 WINDSOR FM 2164 1,180 0.22 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 706 100% 850 1122 155 9671,432,000$ 1,432,000$ C-23 US 77 RINEY WINDSOR 2,430 0.46 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 374 100% 850 2346 172 2,1742,819,000$ 2,819,000$ C-24 US 77 RINEY RINEY 2,120 0.40 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 374 100% 850 2040 149 1,8912,075,000$ 2,075,000$ C-25 US 77 BONNIE BRAE RINEY 3,960 0.75 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 297 100% 850 3825 223 3,6023,126,000$ 3,126,000$ C-26 US 77 LOOP 288 BONNIE BRAE 1,720 0.33 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 490 100% 850 1683 162 1,5211,859,000$ 1,859,000$ C-27 US 77 IH 35 LOOP 288 4,610 0.87 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 461 100% 850 4437 401 4,0364,739,000$ 4,739,000$ C-28 MASCH BRANCH-NAIL MASCH BRANCH 1295' W OF MASCH BRANCH 1,295 0.25 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 275 0 2752,094,000$ 2,094,000$ C-29 MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 1050' E OF LOOP 288 1550' W OF LOOP 288 2,600 0.49 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 539 0 5394,450,000$ 4,450,000$ C-30 MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 1335' W OF THOMAS J EGAN 775' E OF C WOLFE 2,550 0.48 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 528 0 5284,379,000$ 4,379,000$ C-31 MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 775' E OF C WOLFE 690' W OF C WOLFE 1,470 0.28 2 COLLECTOR C New New 50% 550 154 0 1542,092,000$ 1,046,000$ C-32 MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 690' W OF C WOLFE NAIL 3,075 0.58 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 638 0 6384,376,000$ 4,376,000$ C-33 WESTGATE WESTGATE 1460' E OF IH-35 975 0.18 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 540 0 5402,336,000$ 2,336,000$ C-34 WINDSOR US 77 HINKLE 2,420 0.46 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 383 100% 750 1380 176 1,2046,912,000$ 6,912,000$ C-35 WINDSOR HINKLE BONNIE BRAE 5,240 0.99 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA (1/2) Widening 478 100% 750 2970 473 2,4976,972,000$ 6,972,000$ C-36 WINDSOR WESTGATE 145' W OF CLARENDON 505 0.10 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA (1/2) Widening 124 100% 750 300 12 288649,000$ 649,000$ C-37 WINDSOR 220' W OF WINDSOR FARMS IH 35 905 0.17 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA (1/2) Widening 124 100% 750 510 21 4891,162,000$ 1,162,000$ C-38 WINDSOR IH 35 MASCH BRANCH 6,535 1.24 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 3720 0 3,72017,606,000$ 17,606,000$ C-39 BARTHOLD GANZER 2600' S OF GANZER 2,600 0.49 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 103 100% 750 1470 51 1,4197,425,000$ 7,425,000$ C-40 BONNIE BRAE MILAM LOOP 288 16,505 3.13 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 15963 0 15,96352,065,000$ 52,065,000$ C-41 BONNIE BRAE LOOP 288 US 77 1,255 0.24 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 720 0 7203,008,000$ 3,008,000$ C-42 BONNIE BRAE US 77 RINEY 1,985 0.38 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 341 100% 750 1140 130 1,0106,587,000$ 6,587,000$ C-43 BONNIE BRAE RINEY WINDSOR 3,510 0.66 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 220 100% 750 1980 145 1,83510,320,000$ 10,320,000$ C-44 BONNIE BRAE WINDSOR US 380 3,585 0.68 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 959 100% 750 2040 652 1,38811,981,000$ 11,981,000$ C-45,E-29 BONNIE BRAE US 380 PANHANDLE 2,910 0.55 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 825 482 3438,310,000$ 4,155,000$ C-46,E-30 BONNIE BRAE PANHANDLE SCRIPTURE 1,070 0.20 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 300 175 1253,056,000$ 1,528,000$ C-47,E-31 BONNIE BRAE SCRIPTURE OAK 1,180 0.22 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 330 193 1373,370,000$ 1,685,000$ C-48,E-32 BONNIE BRAE OAK HICKORY 380 0.07 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 105 61 441,087,000$ 543,500$ C-49,E-33 BONNIE BRAE HICKORY PRAIRIE 1,425 0.27 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 405 237 1684,070,000$ 2,035,000$ C-50,E-34 BONNIE BRAE PRAIRIE IH 35E 860 0.16 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 240 140 1002,457,000$ 1,228,500$ C-51 C WOLFE US 380 WESTERN-NAIL 2,705 0.51 2 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 867 0 8678,901,000$ 8,901,000$ C-52 FALLMEADOW MEADOWLEDGE GARDENVIEW 915 0.17 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 187 0 1871,303,000$ 1,303,000$ C-53,D-22 FM 2164 MILAM LOOP 288 13,855 2.62 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 2,098 50% 850 6681 2749 3,93249,925,000$ 24,962,500$ C-54,D-28 LOCUST LOOP 288 HERCULES 2,260 0.43 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,923 50% 750 645 413 2326,954,000$ 3,477,000$ C-55,D-29 LOCUST HERCULES BELL 2,375 0.45 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,429 50% 750 675 322 3537,433,000$ 3,716,500$ C-56,D-30 LOCUST BELL WINDSOR 1,270 0.24 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 999 50% 750 360 120 2403,628,000$ 1,814,000$ C-57,D-31 LOCUST WINDSOR FM 2164 1,345 0.25 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 941 50% 750 375 118 2573,841,000$ 1,920,500$ C-58 LOVERS FM 1173 MASCH BRANCH 4,120 0.78 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 129 100% 750 2340 101 2,23912,266,000$ 12,266,000$ C-59 LOVERS 1085' N OF MASCH BRANCH MASCH BRANCH 1,085 0.21 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 160 100% 750 630 34 5963,349,000$ 3,349,000$ C-60 LOVERS LN CONNECTOR LOVERS LOOP 288 315 0.06 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 180 0 180756,000$ 756,000$ C-61 LOVERS LN CONNECTOR LOOP 288 1085' N OF MASCH BRANCH 405 0.08 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 240 0 240972,000$ 972,000$ C-62 MASCH BRANCH 1295' S OF FM 1173 JACKSON 4,170 0.79 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 444 50% 750 1185 176 1,00911,908,000$ 5,954,000$ C-63 MASCH BRANCH LOVERS US 380 3,800 0.72 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 100 100% 750 2160 72 2,08811,352,000$ 11,352,000$ C-64 MASCH BRANCH US 380 JIM CHRISTAL 4,110 0.78 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 147 100% 750 2340 115 2,22512,137,000$ 12,137,000$ C-65 MILAM-LOOP 288 MILAM LOOP 288 14,335 2.71 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 8130 0 8,13036,182,000$ 36,182,000$ TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREAFROM TOCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCIP Service Units of SupplyProject ID #ROADWAYLIMITSLANESIMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATIONPEAK HOUR VOLUME% IN SERVICE AREATOTAL PROJECT COST 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix B - Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy Service Area C5/14/2024VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESSLENGTHLENGTHMTPROADWAYCAPACITYSUPPLYTOTALCAPACITY(FT) (MI) CLASSIFICATIONSTATUSPK-HRPK-HRDEMANDPK-HRPER LNTOTAL1PK-HR2VEH-MI3TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREAFROM TOCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCIP Service Units of SupplyProject ID #ROADWAYLIMITSLANESIMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATIONPEAK HOUR VOLUME% IN SERVICE AREATOTAL PROJECT COSTC-66 MILAM-US 77 MILAM GANZER 7,975 1.51 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 4530 0 4,53020,546,000$ 20,546,000$ C-67 MILAM-US 77 GANZER LONG 3,875 0.73 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 95 100% 750 2190 69 2,12111,567,000$ 11,567,000$ C-68 MILAM-US 77 LONG US 77 2,800 0.53 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1590 0 1,5907,359,000$ 7,359,000$ C-69 NICOSIA LOOP 288 BEALL 645 0.12 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 132 0 1321,169,000$ 1,169,000$ C-70 THOMAS J EGAN US 380 JIM CHRISTAL 4,010 0.76 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 552 100% 750 2280 420 1,86012,353,000$ 12,353,000$ C-71WESTERNUS 380JIM CHRISTAL4,2450.806PRIMARY ARTERIALPAWidening164100%85040801323,94814,699,000$ 14,699,000$ 145,09211,526133,566695,918,000$ 587,514,000$ 2022 Roadway Impact Impact Fee Cost per Service Area 37,660$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA C587,551,660$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area]2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area]3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total]Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280].SUBTOTAL 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix B - Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy Service Area D5/14/2024VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESSLENGTHLENGTHMTPROADWAYCAPACITYSUPPLYTOTALCAPACITY(FT) (MI) CLASSIFICATIONSTATUSPK-HRPK-HRDEMANDPK-HRPER LNTOTAL1PK-HR2VEH-MI3D-1 BOBCAT 560' W OF FM 2164 FM 2164 560 0.11 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 38 50% 750 165 2 1631,601,000$ 800,500$ D-2 FISHTRAP MINGO GEESLING 1,890 0.36 2 COLLECTOR C New New 50% 550 198 0 1982,939,000$ 1,469,500.00$ D-3 GANZER 15,500' E OF SHERMAN 4600' W OF SHERMAN 17,985 3.41 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 17391 0 1739153,936,000$ 53,936,000.00$ D-4 GRIBBLE SPRINGS INDIAN WELLS 3015' W OF INDIAN WELLS 3,015 0.57 2 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 624 50% 750 428 178 2508,861,000$ 4,430,500$ D-5 HARTLEE FIELD 4220' E OF COOPER CREEK COOPER CREEK 4,220 0.80 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 624 50% 750 1200 250 95012,051,000$ 6,025,500$ D-6 HARTLEE FIELD COOPER CREEK 5170' W OF COOPER CREEK 5,170 0.98 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 37 50% 750 1470 18 1,45214,764,000$ 7,382,000$ D-7 HARTLEE FIELD 600' E OF SHERMAN SHERMAN 600 0.11 2 COLLECTOR C Widening 4 50% 550 61 0 61855,000$ 427,500$ D-8 HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 HARTLEE FIELD SHERMAN 2,250 0.43 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1290 0 1,2905,392,000$ 5,392,000$ D-9 HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 SHERMAN 3500' W OF SHERMAN 3,500 0.66 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1980 0 1,9808,386,000$ 8,386,000$ D-10 HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 STUART 1485' W OF STUART 1,485 0.28 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 50% 750 420 0 4203,809,000$ 1,904,500$ D-11 HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 475' W OF FM 2164 FM 2164 475 0.09 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 270 0 2701,139,000$ 1,139,000$ D-12 LONG 510' W OF FM 2164 FM 2164 510 0.10 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 110 0 110726,000$ 726,000$ D-13 MINGO E CITY LIMITS COOPER CREEK 460 0.09 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 260 100% 750 270 23 2471,315,000$ 1,315,000$ D-14 MINGO COOPER CREEK LOOP 288 2,305 0.44 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 552 100% 750 1320 243 1,0776,583,000$ 6,583,000$ D-15 MINGO LOOP 288 US 380 2,275 0.43 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 552 100% 750 1290 237 1,0537,937,000$ 7,937,000$ D-16 KINGS ROW SILVER DOME LOOP 288 2,655 0.50 2 COLLECTOR C Widening 552 100% 550 550 276 2743,779,000$ 3,779,000$ D-17 SILVER DOME COOPER CREEK FARRIS RD 2,190 0.41 2 COLLECTOR C Widening 552 50% 550 226 113 1133,117,000$ 1,558,500$ D-18 COLLINS HARTLEE FIELD 2730' S OF HARTLEE FIELD 4,440 0.84 4 COLLECTOR C Widening 218 50% 550 924 92 8326,818,000$ 3,409,000$ D-19 COOPER CREEK SHERMAN HARTLEE FIELD 10,065 1.91 6 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 8595 0 8,59525,554,000$ 25,554,000$ D-20 COOPER CREEK SILVER DOME MINGO 4,360 0.83 6 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,822 50% 750 1868 756 1,11212,452,000$ 6,226,000$ D-21 COOPER CREEK MINGO US 380 1,680 0.32 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 2,250 100% 850 1632 720 9127,361,000$ 7,361,000$ C-53,D-22 FM 2164 MILAM LOOP 288 13,855 2.62 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 2,098 50% 850 6681 2749 3,93249,925,000$ 24,962,500$ D-23 GREEN VALLEY 2395' S OF FM 2153 2935' N OF SHEPARD 7,765 1.47 2 SECONDARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 750 2205 0 2,20524,463,000$ 24,463,000$ D-24 GREEN VALLEY WARSCHUN SHERMAN 2,095 0.40 2 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,856 100% 750 600 742 -1426,234,000$ 6,234,000$ D-25 INDIAN WELLS 1615' S OF FM 2153 4930' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS 3,870 0.73 2 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1095 0 1,09510,021,000$ 10,021,000$ D-26 INDIAN WELLS 4930' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS 2905' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS 2,025 0.38 2 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 50% 750 285 0 2854,853,000$ 2,426,500$ D-27 INDIAN WELLS 2905' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS GRIBBLE SPRINGS 2,905 0.55 2 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 67 50% 750 413 18 3958,296,000$ 4,148,000$ C-54,D-28 LOCUST LOOP 288 HERCULES 2,260 0.43 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,923 50% 750 645 413 2326,954,000$ 3,477,000$ C-55,D-29 LOCUST HERCULES BELL 2,375 0.45 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,429 50% 750 675 322 3537,433,000$ 3,716,500$ C-56,D-30 LOCUST BELL WINDSOR 1,270 0.24 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 999 50% 750 360 120 2403,628,000$ 1,814,000$ C-57,D-31 LOCUST WINDSOR FM 2164 1,345 0.25 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 941 50% 750 375 118 2573,841,000$ 1,920,500$ D-32 SHERMAN LOOP 288 HERCULES 1,650 0.31 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 2,214 100% 750 930 686 2444,713,000$ 4,713,000$ D-33 SHERMAN HERCULES KINGS 1,910 0.36 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,923 100% 750 1080 692 3885,455,000$ 5,455,000$ D-34 SHERMAN KINGS WINDSOR 2,025 0.38 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,781 100% 750 1140 677 4637,223,000$ 7,223,000$ D-35 SHERMAN WINDSOR WILSONWOOD 1,000 0.19 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,651 100% 750 570 314 2562,856,000$ 2,856,000$ D-36 SHERMAN WILSONWOOD CORONADO 1,165 0.22 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,646 100% 750 660 362 2983,328,000$ 3,328,000$ D-37 SHERMAN CORONADO GREENWOOD 1,640 0.31 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,659 100% 750 930 514 4164,685,000$ 4,685,000$ D-38 SHERMAN GREENWOOD BELL 825 0.16 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 2,075 100% 750 480 332 1482,357,000$ 2,357,000$ D-39 SHERMAN BELL LOCUST 1,715 0.32 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,934 100% 750 960 619 3414,899,000$ 4,899,000$ D-40WINDSORLOOP 288DOMINION8600.162COLLECTORCNewNew100%55017601761,225,000$ 1,225,000$ 61,91811,58650,332351,764,000$ 275,665,500$ 2022 Roadway Impact Impact Fee Cost per Service Area 37,660$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA D275,703,160$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area]2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area]3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total]Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280].TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREAFROM TOSUBTOTALCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCIP Service Units of SupplyProject ID #ROADWAYLIMITSLANESIMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATIONPEAK HOUR VOLUME% IN SERVICE AREATOTAL PROJECT COST 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix B - Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy Service Area E5/14/2024VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESSLENGTHLENGTHMTPROADWAYCAPACITYSUPPLYTOTALCAPACITY(FT) (MI) CLASSIFICATIONSTATUSPK-HRPK-HRDEMANDPK-HRPER LNTOTAL1PK-HR2VEH-MI3E-1 AUDRA LOOP 288 1185' W OF LOOP 288 1,185 0.22 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 242 0 2421,687,000$ 1,687,000$ E-2 BLAGG LAKEVIEW GEESLING 3,740 0.71 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 552 100% 750 2130 392 173811,181,000$ 11,181,000.00$ E-3 BLAGG GEESLING 2175' W OF GEESLING 2,175 0.41 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 2 100% 750 1230 1 12297,651,000$ 7,651,000.00$ E-4 BLAGG 235' E OF MAYHILL MAYHILL 235 0.04 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 50% 750 60 0 60563,000$ 281,500$ E-5 DALLAS TEASLEY IH 35E 4,590 0.87 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 2,394 100% 850 4437 2083 2,3543,624,000$ 3,624,000$ E-6 DUCHESS TRAILHEAD WOODROW 4,005 0.76 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 836 0 8365,949,000$ 5,949,000$ E-7 FM 426 LANEY GRISSOM 2,995 0.57 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 458 100% 750 1710 261 1,4499,953,000$ 9,953,000$ E-8 MCKINNEY GRISSOM LOOP 288 8,735 1.65 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL Completed Widening 458 100% 750 4950 755 4,1951,551,000$ 1,551,000$ E-9 MCKINNEY LOOP 288 CARDINAL 670 0.13 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,731 100% 750 390 225 1651,914,000$ 1,914,000$ E-10 MCKINNEY CARDINAL MOCKINGBIRD 1,145 0.22 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,730 100% 750 660 381 2793,270,000$ 3,270,000$ E-11 MCKINNEY MOCKINGBIRD MACK 3,245 0.61 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 552 100% 750 1830 337 1,4939,268,000$ 9,268,000$ E-12 MCKINNEY MACK AUDRA 1,540 0.29 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,367 100% 750 870 396 4744,399,000$ 4,399,000$ E-13 MILLS TRINITY MAYHILL 7,415 1.40 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 552 100% 750 4200 773 3,42723,115,000$ 23,115,000$ E-14 MILLS LAKEVIEW MAYHILL 2,185 0.41 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1230 0 1,2305,235,000$ 5,235,000$ E-15 MINGO US 380 OLD NORTH 760 0.14 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 552 100% 750 420 77 3432,172,000$ 2,172,000$ E-16 MINGO OLD NORTH NOTTINGHAM 2,545 0.48 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 527 100% 750 1440 253 1,1877,268,000$ 7,268,000$ E-17 MINGO NOTTINGHAM PERTAIN 2,935 0.56 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 92 100% 750 1680 51 1,6298,381,000$ 8,381,000$ E-18 MINGO PERTAIN RUDDELL 945 0.18 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 201 100% 750 540 36 5042,700,000$ 2,700,000$ E-19 MINGO RUDDELL WILLIS 600 0.11 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 327 100% 750 330 36 2941,714,000$ 1,714,000$ E-20 MINGO WILLIS WITHERS 2,305 0.44 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 521 100% 750 1320 229 1,0916,583,000$ 6,583,000$ E-21 MINGO WITHERS PAISLEY 235 0.04 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 534 100% 750 120 21 99671,000$ 671,000$ E-22 MINGO PAISLEY BELL 985 0.19 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 599 100% 750 570 114 4562,813,000$ 2,813,000$ E-23 MORSE MAYHILL KIMBERLY 1,145 0.22 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA (1/2) Widening 1,442 100% 750 660 317 3431,969,000$ 1,969,000$ E-24 SHADY OAKS WOODROW TEASLEY 3,070 0.58 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 159 100% 750 1740 92 1,6489,967,000$ 9,967,000$ E-25 SPENCER MAYHILL LOOP 288 2,315 0.44 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,240 100% 750 1320 546 7746,862,000$ 6,862,000$ E-26 TREATMENT PLANT MCKINNEY POST OAK 3,325 0.63 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 693 0 6934,731,000$ 4,731,000$ E-27 TREATMENT PLANT POST OAK 1325' W OF POST OAK 1,325 0.25 6 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1125 0 1,1255,015,000$ 5,015,000$ E-28 TREATMENT PLANT 1325' W OF POST OAK MAYHILL 3,960 0.75 6 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 552 100% 750 3375 414 2,96111,310,000$ 11,310,000$ C-45,E-29 BONNIE BRAE US 380 PANHANDLE 2,910 0.55 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 825 482 3438,310,000$ 4,155,000$ C-46,E-30 BONNIE BRAE PANHANDLE SCRIPTURE 1,070 0.20 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 300 175 1253,056,000$ 1,528,000$ C-47,E-31 BONNIE BRAE SCRIPTURE OAK 1,180 0.22 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 330 193 1373,370,000$ 1,685,000$ C-48,E-32 BONNIE BRAE OAK HICKORY 380 0.07 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 105 61 441,087,000$ 543,500$ C-49,E-33 BONNIE BRAE HICKORY PRAIRIE 1,425 0.27 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 405 237 1684,070,000$ 2,035,000$ C-50,E-34 BONNIE BRAE PRAIRIE IH 35E 860 0.16 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,754 50% 750 240 140 1002,457,000$ 1,228,500$ E-35 CARDINAL ORIOLE MCKINNEY 2,225 0.42 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 462 0 4623,167,000$ 3,167,000$ E-36 GEESLING US 380 BLAGG 2,445 0.46 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1,948 100% 850 2346 896 1,4508,237,000$ 8,237,000$ E-37 GEESLING US 380 BLAGG 5,395 1.02 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 5202 0 5,20218,210,000$ 18,210,000$ E-38 LAKEVIEW POST OAK SHADY SHORES 1,385 0.26 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 1,520 100% 850 1326 395 9312,294,000$ 2,294,000$ E-39 MAYHILL US 380 PROMINENCE 2,335 0.44 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 2,874 100% 850 2244 1265 9792,467,000$ 2,467,000$ E-40 MAYHILL PROMINENCE 770' N OF RUSSELL NEWMAN 2,040 0.39 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 2,874 100% 850 1989 1121 8682,155,000$ 2,155,000$ E-41 MAYHILL 770' N OF RUSSELL NEWMAN RUSSELL NEWMAN 775 0.15 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 2,874 50% 850 383 216 167819,000$ 409,500$ E-42 MAYHILL RUSSELL NEWMAN 460' S OF RUSSELL NEWMAN 460 0.09 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 3,066 50% 850 230 138 92487,000$ 243,500$ E-43 MAYHILL 460' S OF RUSSELL NEWMANMILLS 1,080 0.20 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 3,066 100% 850 1020 613 4071,142,000$ 1,142,000$ E-44 MAYHILL MILLS MCKINNEY 1,955 0.37 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 3,215 100% 850 1887 1190 6972,066,000$ 2,066,000$ E-45 MAYHILL MCKINNEY MORSE 2,045 0.39 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 3,731 100% 850 1989 1455 5342,161,000$ 2,161,000$ E-46 MAYHILL MORSE SPENCER 3,520 0.67 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 3,002 100% 850 3417 2012 1,4053,717,000$ 3,717,000$ E-47 MAYHILL SPENCER EDWARDS 3,185 0.60 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 4,075 100% 850 3060 2445 6153,864,000$ 3,864,000$ E-48 MAYHILL 2725' N OF COLORADO COLORADO 2,725 0.52 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) New New 100% 850 2652 0 2,6524,477,000$ 4,477,000$ E-49 MAYHILL COLORADO IH 35E 2,330 0.44 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 5,548 100% 850 2244 2441 -1971,840,000$ 1,840,000$ E-50 MAYHILL CONNECTOR MAYHILL QUAILCREEK 700 0.13 2 COLLECTOR PA New New 100% 550 143 0 1432,071,000$ 2,071,000$ E-51 MOCKINGBIRD MCKINNEY 625' N OF DUCHESS 855 0.16 4 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 352 0 3521,217,000$ 1,217,000$ E-52 MOCKINGBIRD DUCHESS SHADY OAKS 2,170 0.41 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1230 0 1,2307,039,000$ 7,039,000$ E-53 MOCKINGBIRD SHADY OAKS SPENCER 2,805 0.53 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1590 0 1,5906,721,000$ 6,721,000$ E-54 POST OAK MILLS SPENCER 6,840 1.30 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 6630 0 6,63020,228,000$ 20,228,000$ E-55 POST OAK TREATMENT PLANT EDWARDS 6,685 1.27 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 6477 0 6,47721,525,000$ 21,525,000$ E-56 POST OAK EDWARDS POCKRUS PAGE 2,710 0.51 2 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 867 0 8678,015,000$ 8,015,000$ E-57 SWISHER EDWARDS POCKRUS PAGE 2,635 0.50 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 550 0 5503,750,000$ 3,750,000$ E-58 TEASLEY DALLAS IH 35E 1,870 0.35 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 2,090 100% 850 1785 732 1,0532,077,000$ 2,077,000$ E-59 N STAR SPENCER ROY 1,705 0.32 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 352 0 3522,427,000$ 2,427,000$ E-60ROYMAYHILLN STAR1,1200.212COLLECTORCNewNew100%55023102311,594,000$ 1,594,000$ 92,97123,99768,974317,633,000$ 305,523,500$ 2022 Roadway Impact Impact Fee Cost per Service Area 37,660$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA E305,561,160$ 1. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area]2. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area]3. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total]Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280].TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREAFROM TOSUBTOTALCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCIP Service Units of SupplyProject ID #ROADWAYLIMITSLANESIMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATIONPEAK HOUR VOLUME% IN SERVICE AREATOTAL PROJECT COST 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix B - Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Suppy 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas Appendix C – Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area A12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBCORBIN IH-35W CORBIN 3,055 0.58 1 1 2U-R SA 5 5 100% 150 150 87 87 3 3 84 84 FM 1515 IH 35W CORBIN 5,990 1.13 1 1 2U-H PA 381 381 100% 725 725 819 819 431 431 389 389 FM 1515 CORBIN WESTERN 1,175 0.22 1 1 2U-H PA 230 230 100% 725 725 160 160 51 51 109 109 FM 1515 WESTERN WESTCOURT 1,555 0.29 1 1 2U-H PA 560 560 100% 725 725 210 210 162 162 48 48 FM 1515 WESTCOURTMASCH BRANCH 620 0.12 1 1 2U PA 276 276 100% 450 450 54 54 33 33 21 21 FM 1515 TOM COLE 3435' W OF TOM COLE 3,435 0.65 1 1 2U-R PA 332 332 100% 150 150 98 98 216 216 -118 -118 118 118FM 1515 3435' W OF TOM COLE 530' E OF C WOLFE 3,750 0.71 1 1 2U-R PA 309 309 100% 150 150 107 107 219 219 -113 -113 113 113FM 2449 4380' E OF C WOLFE C WOLFE 4,380 0.83 1 1 2U-H PA 682 682 100% 725 725 602 602 566 566 36 36 FM 2449 AMYX HILL RD 3830' W OF AMYX HILL RD 3,830 0.73 1 1 2U-H PA 189 189 50% 725 725 265 265 69 69 196 196 H LIVELY C WOLFE 2145' W OF H LIVELY 2,145 0.41 1 1 2U-R PA 24 24 50% 150 150 31 31 5 5 26 26 H LIVELY 2145' W OF H LIVELY 2150' W OF ED ROBSON 3,915 0.74 1 1 2U-R PA 117 117 100% 150 150 111 111 87 87 24 24 JIM CHRISTAL IH 35 OLD SH 24 3,110 0.59 1 1 2U-H SA 645 645 100% 725 725 428 428 381 381 47 47 JIM CHRISTAL OLD SH 24 WESTERN 2,905 0.55 1 1 2U-H SA 528 528 50% 725 725 199 199 145 145 54 54 JIM CHRISTAL WESTERN MASCH BRANCH 3,510 0.66 1 1 2U-H SA 455 455 50% 725 725 239 239 150 150 89 89 JIM CHRISTAL MASCH BRANCH THOMAS J EGAN 5,975 1.13 1 1 2U-H SA 119 119 50% 725 725 410 410 67 67 342 342 JIM CHRISTAL THOMAS J EGAN 515' E OF C WOLFE 3,945 0.75 1 1 2U-H SA 119 119 50% 725 725 272 272 45 45 227 227 ROBSON RANCH IH 35W ED ROBSON 8,720 1.65 2 2 4U PA 404 404 50% 550 550 908 908 333 333 574 574 ROBSON RANCH ED ROBSON YARBROUGH 7,150 1.35 2 2 4U PA 314 314 50% 550 550 743 743 212 212 531 531 SPRINGSIDE CORBIN UNDERWOOD 1,835 0.35 1 1 2U SA 310 310 100% 450 450 158 158 109 109 49 49 SPRINGSIDE UNDERWOOD WESTCOURT 865 0.16 1 1 2U SA 15 15 100% 450 450 72 72 2 2 70 70 C WOLFE 1140' S OF TOM COLE FM 2449 7,270 1.38 1 1 2U-R PA 112 112 100% 150 150 207 207 155 155 52 52 CORBIN AIRPORT 1335' S OF FM 1515 1,355 0.26 2 2 4U C 310 310 100% 550 550 286 286 81 81 205 205 CORBIN 1335' S OF FM 1515 IH-35-CORBIN 675 0.13 1 1 3U C 310 310 100% 550 550 72 72 40 40 31 31 CORBIN IH-35-CORBIN SPRINGSIDE 2,050 0.39 1 1 2U-R C 310 310 100% 150 150 59 59 121 121 -62 -62 62 62H LIVELY FM 2449 H LIVELY 3,315 0.63 1 1 2U PA 482 482 50% 450 450 142 142 152 152 -10 -10 10 10LOOP 288 IH-35W UNDERWOOD CONNECTOR 2,565 0.49 1 1 2U-H FWY 1,483 1,483 100% 725 725 355 355 727 727 -371 -371 371 371PRECISION 1635' N OF FM 1515 FM 1515 1,635 0.31 1 1 2U C 222 222 100% 450 450 140 140 69 69 71 71 UNDERWOOD SPRINGSIDE UNDERWOOD CONNECTOR 4,000 0.76 1 1 2U PA 346 346 100% 450 450 342 342 263 263 79 79 UNDERWOOD LOOP 288 1610' N OF H LIVELY 5,910 1.12 1 1 2U-R PA 30 30 100% 150 150 168 168 34 34 134 134 UNDERWOOD CONNECTOR UNDERWOOD 915' S OF UNDERWOOD 915 0.17 1 1 2U SA 321 321 100% 450 450 77 77 55 55 22 22 WESTCOURT FM 1515 SPRINGSIDE 4,165 0.79 1 1 2U SA 276 276 100% 450 450 356 356 218 218 137 137 WESTERNJIM CHRISTALAIRPORT6,4851.23224DPA127127100%7507501,8451,8451561561,6891,689 SUBTOTAL112,20521.2610,01610,0165,3545,3544,6624,662674674City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HR20,03210,7099,3231,348VEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MI2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area B12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBACME FORT WORTH BERNARD 480 0.09 1 1 2U C 485 485 100% 450 450 41 41 44 44 -3 -3 3 3ALLRED BONNIE BRAE BRUSH CREEK 4,285 0.81 1 1 2U-R C 6 6 50% 150 150 61 61 2 2 58 58 ALLRED BRUSH CREEK JOHN PAINE 1,610 0.30 1 1 2U-R PA 585 585 50% 150 150 23 23 88 88 -65 -65 65 65ALLRED JOHN PAINE 365' W OF IH-35W 1,480 0.28 1 1 2U-R PA 654 654 100% 150 150 42 42 183 183 -141 -141 141 141ALLRED 365' W OF IH-35WIH-35W 365 0.07 1 1 2U-R PA 719 719 100% 150 150 11 11 50 50 -40 -40 40 40BRUSH CREEK 815' E OF COUNTRY CLUB COUNTRY CLUB 815 0.15 1 1 2U-R PA 1,131 1,131 100% 150 150 23 23 170 170 -147 -147 147 147BRUSH CREEK COUNTRY CLUB 1935' W OF COUNTRY CLUB 1,935 0.37 1 1 2U-R PA 150 150 100% 150 150 56 56 56 56 0 0 BRUSH CREEK 2180' E OF FORT WORTH FORT WORTH 2,180 0.41 1 1 2U-R PA 150 150 100% 150 150 62 62 62 62 0 0 CORBIN BONNIE BRAE IH-35W 3,505 0.66 1 1 2U-R SA 5 5 100% 150 150 99 99 3 3 96 96 CRAWFORD FORT WORTH IH 35W 3,360 0.64 1 1 2U-R SA 1,328 1,328 50% 150 150 48 48 425 425 -377 -377 377 377CREEKDALE TEASLEY PIMLICO 2,750 0.52 1 1 2U C 223 223 100% 450 450 234 234 116 116 118 118 CREEKDALE RIVERCHASE THISTLE WAY 1,610 0.30 1 1 2U C 495 495 100% 450 450 135 135 149 149 -14 -14 14 14CREEKDALE RED FOX EAGLESTONE 1,425 0.27 1 1 2U C 349 349 100% 450 450 122 122 94 94 27 27 CREEKDALE RYAN RED FOX 825 0.16 1 1 3U C 349 349 100% 550 550 88 88 56 56 32 32 EL PASEO MONTECITO FORRESTRIDGE 1,760 0.33 1 1 2U C 262 262 100% 450 450 149 149 86 86 62 62 EL PASEO FORRESTRIDGE BELMONT 1,905 0.36 1 1 2U C 131 131 100% 450 450 162 162 47 47 115 115 FM 1515 BONNIE BRAE IH 35W 770 0.15 1 1 2U PA 987 987 100% 450 450 68 68 148 148 -81 -81 81 81HICKORY CREEK FM 2499 NAUTICA 1,175 0.22 1 1 2U PA 1,471 1,471 100% 450 450 99 99 324 324 -225 -225 225 225HICKORY CREEK NAUTICA TEASLEY 1,310 0.25 2 2 4D PA 1,471 1,471 100% 750 750 375 375 368 368 7 7 HICKORY CREEK TEASLEY MONTECITO 4,475 0.85 1 1 2U PA 218 218 100% 450 450 383 383 185 185 197 197 HICKORY CREEK MONTECITO 1435' W OF BIDDY BYE 2,230 0.42 1 1 2U PA 1,131 1,131 50% 450 450 95 95 238 238 -143 -143 143 143HIGHLAND PARK HIGHLAND PARK BONNIE BRAE 1,840 0.35 1 1 2U C 20 20 100% 450 450 158 158 7 7 151 151 HOBSON LANE TEASLEY MONTECITO 670 0.13 1 1 2U SA 278 278 100% 450 450 59 59 36 36 22 22 HOBSON LANE MONTECITO FORRESTRIDGE 1,495 0.28 1 1 2U SA 276 276 100% 450 450 126 126 77 77 49 49 HOBSON LANE FORRESTRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 3,785 0.72 1 1 2U SA 125 125 100% 450 450 324 324 90 90 234 234 LONDONDERRY SOUTHRIDGE TEASLEY 1,755 0.33 1 1 2U C 7 7 100% 450 450 149 149 2 2 146 146 LONDONDERRY TEASLEY SAM BASS 2,105 0.40 1 1 2U C 4 4 100% 450 450 180 180 2 2 178 178 MONTECITO HICKORY CREEK TEASLEY 5,875 1.11 2 2 4U C 847 847 100% 550 550 1,221 1,221 940 940 281 281 PARVIN BERNARD MCCORMICK 1,580 0.30 1 1 2U C 47 47 100% 450 450 135 135 14 14 121 121 ROBINSON POST OAK FM 2499 685 0.13 2 2 4D SA 1,379 1,379 50% 750 750 98 98 90 90 8 8 ROBINSON HARVARD BERKLEY 1,055 0.20 2 2 4D SA 774 774 100% 750 750 300 300 155 155 145 145 ROBINSON BERKLEY 230' E OF WHEELER RIDGE 505 0.10 2 2 4D SA 774 774 100% 750 750 150 150 77 77 73 73 ROBINSON 230' E OF WHEELER RIDGE TEASLEY 2,735 0.52 1 1 2U SA 594 594 100% 450 450 234 234 309 309 -75 -75 75 75ROSELAWN BERNARD BONNIE BRAE 8,310 1.57 1 1 2U C 231 231 100% 450 450 707 707 363 363 344 344 RYAN TEASLEY MONTECITO 4,020 0.76 1 1 2U SA 378 378 100% 450 450 342 342 287 287 55 55 RYAN MONTECITO FORRESTRIDGE 3,305 0.63 1 1 2U SA 276 276 100% 450 450 284 284 174 174 110 110 RYAN FORRESTRIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 3,475 0.66 1 12U SA 23 23 100% 450 450 297 297 15 15 282 282 VINTAGE FORT WORTH BONNIE BRAE 4,605 0.87 1 1 2D PA 211 211 100% 550 550 479 479 184 184 295 295 VINTAGE BONNIE BRAE NAPA VALLEY 765 0.14 1 1 2D PA 937 937 100% 550 550 77 77 131 131 -54 -54 54 54VINTAGE NAPA VALLEY IH 35W 3,435 0.65 1 1 2U PA 937 937 100% 450 450 293 293 609 609 -317 -317 317 317WILLOWWOOD BERNARD MCCORMICK 1,735 0.33 1 1 2U C 58 58 100% 450 450 149 149 19 19 129 129 WILLOWWOOD MCCORMICK HIGHLAND PARK 2,250 0.43 1 1 2U C 132 132 100% 450 450 194 194 57 57 137 137 WILLOWWOOD HIGHLAND PARK 1250' W OF HIGHLAND PARK 775 0.15 1 1 2U C 301 301 100% 450 450 68 68 45 45 22 22 WILLOWWOOD 1250' W OF HIGHLAND PARK BONNIE BRAE 1,285 0.24 1 1 2U-R C 519 519 100% 150 150 36 36 125 125 -89 -89 89 89WIND RIVER IH 35E TEASLEY 5,995 1.14 1 1 3U C 58 58 100% 550 550 627 627 66 66 561 561 MCCORMICK IH 35E WILLOWWOOD 1,875 0.36 1 1 2U C 96 96 100% 450 450 162 162 35 35 127 127 BERNARD IH 35E WILLOWWOOD 315 0.06 1 1 2U C 100 100 100% 450 450 27 27 6 6 21 21 BERNARD WILLOWWOOD ACME 505 0.10 1 1 2U C 55 55 100% 450 450 45 45 6 6 40 40 BERNARD ACME PARVIN 1,520 0.29 1 1 2U C 527 527 100% 450 450 131 131 153 153 -22 -22 22 22BONNIE BRAE IH 35E FM 1515 725 0.14 1 1 2U SA 1,496 1,496 100% 450 450 63 63 209 209 -146 -146 146 146BONNIE BRAE FM 1515 WILLOWWOOD 5,740 1.09 1 1 2U SA 1,001 1,001 100% 450 450 491 491 1,091 1,091 -601 -601 601 601BONNIE BRAE 1010' N OF VINTAGE VINTAGE 1,010 0.19 1 1 2U SA 847 847 100% 450 450 86 86 161 161 -75 -75 75 75BONNIE BRAE VINTAGE ALLRED 6,275 1.19 1 1 2U C 1,154 1,154 50% 450 450 268 268 687 687 -419 -419 419 419COUNTRY CLUB FORT WORTH HOBSON 430 0.08 1 1 2U SA 718 718 100% 450 450 36 36 57 57 -21 -21 21 21COUNTRY CLUB HOBSON RYAN 5,285 1.00 1 1 2U SA 642 642 100% 450 450 450 450 642 642 -192 -192 192 192COUNTRY CLUB RYAN HICKORY CREEK 3,485 0.66 1 1 2U SA 276 276 50% 450 450 149 149 91 91 57 57 FM 2499 IH 35E ROBINSON 5,755 1.09 3 3 6D PA 2,970 2,970100% 850 850 2,780 2,780 3,237 3,237 -458 -458 458 458FM 2499 ROBINSON 600' S OF OCEAN 5,940 1.13 3 3 6D PA 2,412 2,412 100% 850 850 2,882 2,882 2,726 2,726 156 156 FORRESTRIDGE HOBSON EL PASEO 2,855 0.54 1 1 2U C 108 108 100% 450 450 243 243 58 58 185 185 FORRESTRIDGE EL PASEO RYAN 2,505 0.47 1 1 2U C 23 23 100% 450 450 212 212 11 11 201 201 FORT WORTH IH 35E COUNTRY CLUB 7,390 1.40 1 1 6D PA 1,603 1,603 100% 850 850 1,190 1,190 2,244 2,244 -1,054 -1,054 1,054 1,054FORT WORTH COUNTRY CLUB VINTAGE 6,965 1.32 1 1 2U-H PA 1,370 1,370 100% 725 725 957 957 1,808 1,808 -851 -851 851 851FORT WORTH VINTAGE BONNIE BRAE 5,655 1.07 1 1 2U-H PA 1,199 1,199 100% 725 725 776 776 1,283 1,283 -507 -507 507 507FORT WORTH BONNIE BRAE BRUSH CREEK 1,250 0.24 1 1 2U-H PA 2,362 2,362 100% 725 725 174 174 567 567 -393 -393 393 393FORT WORTH BRUSH CREEK CRAWFORD 5,845 1.11 1 1 2U-H PA 1,795 1,795 100% 725 725 805 805 1,992 1,992 -1,188 -1,188 1,188 1,188HIGHLAND PARK IH 35E WILLOWWOOD 3,155 0.60 1 1 2U C 170 170 100% 450 450 270 270 102 102 168 168 JOHN PAINE TEXOMA ATHENS 675 0.13 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 143 143 83 83 60 60 JOHN PAINE ATHENS CREEKWAY 3,500 0.66 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 726 726 422 422 304 304 LILLIAN MILLER IH 35E SOUTHRIDGE 2,070 0.39 2 2 4D PA 1,508 1,508 100% 750 750 585 585 588 588 -3 -3 3 3City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRVEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MI2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area B12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRVEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MILILLIAN MILLER SOUTHRIDGE WIND RIVER 2,170 0.41 2 2 4D PA 1,335 1,335 100% 750 750 615 615 547 547 68 68 MCCORMICK WILLOWWOOD PARVIN 2,085 0.39 1 1 2U C 4 4 100% 450 450 176 176 2 2 174 174 MONTECITO HOBSON EL PASEO 2,960 0.56 1 1 2U C 153 153 100% 450 450 252 252 86 86 166 166 MONTECITO EL PASEO RYAN 3,060 0.58 1 1 2U C 310 310 100% 450 450 261 261 180 180 81 81 PENNSYLVANIA IH 35E SOUTHRIDGE 1,560 0.30 1 1 2U C 32 32 100% 450 450 135 135 10 10 125 125 PENNSYLVANIA SOUTHRIDGE TEASLEY 4,075 0.77 1 1 2U C 1 1 100% 450 450 347 347 1 1 346 346 RIVERPASS CREEKDALE HICKORY CREEK 2,595 0.49 1 1 2U C 636 636 100% 450 450 221 221 312 312 -91 -91 91 91SAM BASS IH 35E LONDONDERRY 1,600 0.30 1 1 2U C 2 2 100% 450 450 135 135 1 1 134 134 SOUTHRIDGE IH 35E LONDONDERRY 505 0.10 1 1 2U C 4 4 100% 450 450 45 45 0 0 45 45 SOUTHRIDGE LONDONDERRY PENNSYLVANIA 2,410 0.46 1 1 2U C 3 3 100% 450 450 207 207 1 1 206 206 SOUTHRIDGE PENNSYLVANIA LILLIAN B MILLER 2,045 0.39 1 1 2U C 119 119 100% 450 450 176 176 46 46 129 129 TEASLEY IH 35E LONDONDERRY 1,315 0.25 2 2 4D PA 1,704 1,704 100% 750 750 375 375 426 426 -51 -51 51 51TEASLEY LONDONDERRY HOBSON 5,140 0.97 2 2 4D PA 1,568 1,568 100% 750 750 1,455 1,455 1,521 1,521 -66 -66 66 66TEASLEY LILLIAN B MILLER PENNSYLVANIA 1,890 0.36 2 2 4D PA 1,608 1,608 100% 750 750 540 540 579 579 -39 -39 39 39TEASLEY PENNSYLVANIA HOBSON 1,085 0.21 2 2 4D PA 1,567 1,567 100% 750 750 315 315 329 329 -14 -14 14 14TEASLEY WIND RIVER BENT OAKS 1,230 0.23 2 2 4D PA 2,542 2,542 100% 750 750 345 345 585 585 -240 -240 240 240TEASLEY BENT OAKS RYAN 4,455 0.84 2 2 6D PA 2,542 2,542 100% 850 850 1,428 1,428 2,135 2,135 -707 -707 707 707TEASLEY RYAN ROBINSON 1,245 0.24 2 2 6D PA 2,665 2,665 100% 850 850 408 408 640 640 -232 -232 232 232TEASLEY ROBINSON HICKORY CREEK 4,145 0.79 2 2 6D PA 2,888 2,888 100% 850 850 1,343 1,343 2,282 2,282 -939 -939 939 939TEASLEY HICKORY CREEK MONTECITO 1,890 0.36 2 2 6D PA 2,096 2,096 100% 850 850 612 612 755 755 -143 -143 143 143TEASLEY MONTECITO OLD ALTON 3,760 0.71 2 2 6D PA 2,638 2,638 100% 850 850 1,207 1,207 1,873 1,873 -666 -666 666 666TEASLEYOLD ALTON635' W OF FM 24991,8900.36226DPA2,2602,260100%850850612612814814-202-202202202SUBTOTAL238,12545.1333,90733,90738,14938,149-4,242-4,24211,09111,09167,81376,298-8,48522,1822022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area C12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBBARTHOLD MASCH BRANCH 5200' W OF IIH 35 5,195 0.98 1 1 2U-R PA 125 125 50% 150 150 74 74 61 61 12 12 FM 1173 IH 35 4605' W OF IH 35 4,605 0.87 1 1 2U-H SA 324 324 100% 725 725 631 631 282 282 349 349 FM 1173 4605' W OF IH 35 LOVERS 2,190 0.41 1 1 2U-H SA 324 324 50% 725 725 149 149 66 66 82 82 FM 2164 LOCUST ELM 490 0.09 2 2 4D SA 760 760 100% 750 750 135 135 68 68 67 67 GANZER 2900' E OF IH 35IH 35 2,900 0.55 1 1 2U-R PA 115 115 100% 150 150 83 83 63 63 19 19 GANZER 1620' E OF BARTHOLD BARTHOLD 1,620 0.31 1 1 2U PA 87 87 50% 450 450 70 70 13 13 56 56 GANZER BARTHOLD RECTOR 2,585 0.49 1 1 2U PA 37 37 50% 450 450 110 110 9 9 101 101 HERCULES LOCUST TRISTAN 825 0.16 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 72 72 44 44 28 28 HERCULES TRISTAN MEADOWTRAIL LN 770 0.15 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 68 68 41 41 26 26 HERCULES MEADOWTRAIL NICOSIA 3,275 0.62 1 1 2U C 42 42 100% 450 450 279 279 26 26 253 253 HICKORY BONNIE BRAE OAK 530 0.10 2 2 4D SA 628 628 100% 750 750 150 150 63 63 87 87 JIM CHRISTAL OLD SH 24 WESTERN 2,905 0.55 1 1 2U-H SA 528 528 50% 725 725 199 199 145 145 54 54 JIM CHRISTAL WESTERN MASCH BRANCH 3,510 0.66 1 1 2U-H SA 455 455 50% 725 725 239 239 150 150 89 89 JIM CHRISTAL MASCH BRANCH THOMAS J EGAN 5,975 1.13 1 1 2U-H SA 119 119 50% 725 725 410 410 67 67 342 342 JIM CHRISTAL THOMAS J EGAN 515' E OF C WOLFE 3,945 0.75 1 1 2U-H SA 119 119 50% 725 725 272 272 45 45 227 227 JIM CHRISTAL 945' W OF C WOLFE NAIL 3,115 0.59 1 1 2U-H SA 71 71 50% 725 725 214 214 21 21 193 193 JIM CHRISTAL NAIL 2045' W of Nail 2,045 0.39 1 1 2U-H SA 60 60 50% 725 725 141 141 12 12 130 130 LONG N BONNIE BRAE MILAM-US 77 1,255 0.24 1 1 2U-R C 54 54 50% 150 150 18 18 6 6 12 12 MASCH BRANCH MASCH BRANCH DARBY SMITH 3,450 0.65 1 1 2U SA 202 202 100% 450 450 293 293 131 131 161 161 MILAM FM 2164 IH 35 14,085 2.67 1 1 2U-R FWY 312 312 50% 150 150 200 200 417 417 -216 -216 216 216OAK BONNIE BRAE HICKORY 405 0.08 2 2 4D SA 419 419 100% 750 750 120 120 34 34 86 86 OAK HICKORY IH 35 2,090 0.40 2 2 4D SA 1,151 1,151 100% 750 750 600 600 460 460 140 140 PANHANDLE BONNIE BRAE IH 35 3,000 0.57 1 1 2U C 131 131 100% 450 450 257 257 75 75 182 182 RINEY US 77 2460' W OF US 77 2,460 0.47 1 1 2U SA 12 12 100% 450 450 212 212 6 6 206 206 RINEY 2460' W OF US 77 BONNIE BRAE 980 0.19 1 1 2U-R SA 12 12 100% 150 150 29 29 2 2 26 26 SCRIPTURE BONNIE BRAE IH 35 2,455 0.46 1 1 2U C 110 110 100% 450 450 207 207 51 51 156 156 SHERMAN LOCUST ELM 405 0.08 2 2 4U SA 854 854 100% 550 550 88 88 68 68 20 20 SHERMAN ELM CARROLL 1,060 0.20 2 2 4U SA 838 838 100% 550 550 220 220 168 168 52 52 THUNDERBIRD IH 35 NORTHWAY 3,775 0.71 1 1 2U C 140 140 100% 450 450 320 320 99 99 220 220 US 380 LOCUST ELM 410 0.08 3 3 6D PA 1,251 1,251 50% 850 850 102 102 50 50 52 52 US 380 ELM BOLIVAR 380 0.07 3 3 6D PA 1,077 1,077 50% 850 850 89 89 38 38 52 52 US 380 BOLIVAR CARROLL 680 0.13 3 3 6D PA 1,076 1,076 50% 850 850 166 166 70 70 96 96 US 380 CARROLL FULTON 1,955 0.37 3 3 6D PA 1,017 1,017 50% 850 850 472 472 188 188 284 284 US 380 FULTON HINKLE 475 0.09 3 3 6D PA 856 856 50% 850 850 115 115 39 39 76 76 US 380 HINKLE MALONE 1,545 0.29 3 3 6D PA 856 856 50% 850 850 370 370 124 124 246 246 US 380 MALONE ECTOR 1,595 0.30 3 3 6D PA 856 856 50% 850 850 383 383 128 128 254 254 US 380 ECTOR BONNIE BRAE 1,865 0.35 3 3 6D PA 890 890 50% 850 850 446 446 156 156 291 291 US 380 BONNIE BRAE IH 35 3,985 0.75 3 3 6D PA 1,330 1,330 100% 850 850 1,913 1,913 998 998 915 915 US 380 WESTERN IH 35 4,180 0.79 3 3 6D PA 495 495 100% 850 850 2,015 2,015 391 391 1,623 1,623 US 380 WESTERN MASCH BRANCH 2,925 0.55 3 3 6D PA 467 467 100% 850 850 1,403 1,403 257 257 1,146 1,146 US 380 MASCH BRANCH THOMAS J EGAN 2,665 0.50 3 3 6D PA 487 487 100% 850 850 1,275 1,275 244 244 1,032 1,032 US 380 LOOP 288 THOMAS J EGAN 4,595 0.87 3 3 6D FWY 378 378 100% 850 850 2,219 2,219 329 329 1,890 1,890 US 380 THOMAS J EGAN C WOLFE 3,930 0.74 3 3 6D FWY 378 378 100% 850 850 1,887 1,887 280 280 1,607 1,607 US 380 C WOLFE NAIL 3,115 0.59 3 3 6D FWY 378 378 50% 850 850 752 752 112 112 641 641 US 77 WINDSOR FM 2164 1,180 0.22 2 2 4D PA 353 353 100% 750 750 330 330 78 78 252 252 US 77 RINEY WINDSOR 2,430 0.46 2 2 4D PA 187 187 100% 750 750 690 690 86 86 604 604 US 77 RINEY RINEY 2,120 0.40 2 2 4D PA 187 187 100% 750 750 600 600 75 75 525 525 US 77 BONNIE BRAE RINEY 3,960 0.75 2 2 4D PA 149 149 100% 750 750 1,125 1,125 112 112 1,013 1,013 US 77 LOOP 288 BONNIE BRAE 1,720 0.33 2 2 4D PA 245 245 100% 750 750 495 495 81 81 414 414 US 77 IH 35 LOOP 288 4,610 0.87 2 2 4D PA 231 231 100% 750 750 1,305 1,305 201 201 1,104 1,104 WESTGATE 1460' E OF IH-35 IH-35 1,460 0.28 2 2 4D SA 57 57 100% 750 750 420 420 16 16 404 404 WINDSOR LOCUST US 77 2,010 0.38 1 1 3U C 148 148 100% 550 550 209 209 56 56 153 153 WINDSOR US 77 HINKLE 2,420 0.46 1 1 3U SA 192 192 100% 550 550 253 253 88 88 165 165 WINDSOR HINKLE BONNIE BRAE 5,240 0.99 1 1 2U SA 239 239 100% 450 450 446 446 237 237 209 209 WINDSOR BONNIE BRAE WESTGATE 2,700 0.51 2 2 4D SA 62 62 100% 750 750 765 765 32 32 733 733 WINDSOR WESTGATE 145' W OF CLARENDON 505 0.10 1 1 2U SA 62 62 100% 450 450 45 45 6 6 39 39 WINDSOR 145' W OF CLARENDON 220' W OF WINDSOR FARMS 610 0.12 2 2 4D SA 62 62 100% 750 750 180 180 7 7 173 173 WINDSOR 220' W OF WINDSOR FARMS IH 35 905 0.17 1 1 2U SA 62 62 100% 450 450 77 77 11 11 66 66 BARTHOLD GANZER 2600' S OF GANZER 2,600 0.49 1 1 2U SA 52 52 100% 450 450 221 221 25 25 195 195 BONNIE BRAE US 77 RINEY 1,985 0.38 1 1 2U SA 170 170 100% 450 450 171 171 65 65 106 106 BONNIE BRAE RINEY WINDSOR 3,510 0.66 2 2 4U SA 110 110 100% 550 550 726 726 73 73 653 653 BONNIE BRAE WINDSOR US 380 3,585 0.68 2 2 4U SA 479 479 100% 550 550 748 748 326 326 422 422 BONNIE BRAE US 380 PANHANDLE 2,910 0.55 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 303 303 241 241 61 61 BONNIE BRAE PANHANDLE SCRIPTURE 1,070 0.20 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 110 110 88 88 22 22 BONNIE BRAE SCRIPTURE OAK 1,180 0.22 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 121 121 96 96 25 25 BONNIE BRAE OAK HICKORY 380 0.07 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 39 39 31 31 8 8 BONNIE BRAE HICKORY PRAIRIE 1,425 0.27 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 149 149 118 118 30 30 BONNIE BRAE PRAIRIE IH 35E 860 0.16 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 88 88 70 70 18 18 CARROLL SHERMAN US 380 525 0.10 3 3 6D PA 1,087 1,087 100% 850 850 255 255 109 109 146 146 City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRVEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MI2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area C12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRVEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MIELM FM 2164 SHERMAN 3,090 0.59 0 2 6D SA 0 1,106 100% 850 850 0 752 0 653 0 100 ELM SHERMAN US 380 455 0.09 0 2 6D SA 0 1,072 100% 850 850 0 115 0 96 0 18 FALLMEADOW HERCULES MEADOWEDGE LN 1,095 0.21 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 95 95 58 58 37 37 FALLMEADOW GARDENVIEW US 77 1,530 0.29 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 131 131 80 80 50 50 FM 2164 KLEIN MILAM 635 0.12 1 1 2U PA 169 169 50% 450 450 27 27 10 10 17 17 FM 2164 MILAM LOOP 288 13,855 2.62 1 1 2U PA 1,049 1,049 50% 450 450 590 590 1,374 1,374 -785 -785 785 785HERITAGE TRAIL US 380 SCRIPTURE 4,050 0.77 2 2 4D SA 132 132 100% 750 750 1,155 1,155 102 102 1,053 1,053 HINKLE WINDSOR US 380 4,555 0.86 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 387 387 237 237 150 150 LOCUST LOOP 288 HERCULES 2,260 0.43 1 1 2U SA 962 962 50% 450 450 97 97 207 207 -110 -110 110 110LOCUST HERCULES BELL 2,375 0.45 1 1 2U SA 715 715 50% 450 450 101 101 161 161 -60 -60 60 60LOCUST BELL WINDSOR 1,270 0.24 1 1 2U SA 499 499 50% 450 450 54 54 60 60 -6 -6 6 6LOCUST WINDSOR FM 2164 1,345 0.25 1 1 2U SA 471 471 50% 450 450 56 56 59 59 -3 -3 3 3LOCUST FM 2164 CORONADO 630 0.12 2 0 4D SA 870 0 100% 750 750 180 0 104 0 76 0 LOCUST CORONADO SHERMAN 2,420 0.46 2 0 4D SA 870 0 100% 750 750 690 0 400 0 290 0 LOCUST SHERMAN US 380 475 0.09 2 0 4D SA 1,025 513 100% 750 750 135 0 92 46 43 -46 46LOVERS FM 1173 MASCH BRANCH 4,120 0.78 1 1 2U SA 65 65 100% 450 450 351 351 51 51 300 300 LOVERS 1085' N OF MASCH BRANCH MASCH BRANCH 1,085 0.21 1 1 2U SA 80 80 100% 450 450 95 95 17 17 78 78 MALONE AUBURN US 380 2,545 0.48 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 216 216 132 132 84 84 MASCH BRANCH 1295' S OF FM 1173 JACKSON 4,170 0.79 1 1 2U SA 222 222 50% 450 450 178 178 88 88 90 90 MASCH BRANCH LOVERS US 380 3,800 0.72 1 1 2U SA 50 50 100% 450 450 324 324 36 36 288 288 MASCH BRANCH US 380 JIM CHRISTAL 4,110 0.78 1 1 2U SA 74 74 100% 450 450 351 351 58 58 293 293 MILAM-US 77 GANZER LONG 3,875 0.73 1 1 2U-R SA 48 48 100% 150 150 110 110 35 35 74 74 NAIL US 380 2255' S OF JIM CHRISTAL 2,255 0.43 1 1 2U SA 30 30 50% 450 450 97 97 6 6 90 90 NAIL 2255' S OF JIM CHRISTAL JIM CHRISTAL 2,470 0.47 1 1 2U SA 30 30 100% 450 450 212 212 14 14 197 197 NICOSIA BEALL US 77 2,820 0.53 1 1 2U C 62 62 100% 450 450 239 239 33 33 206 206 NORTHWAY WINDSOR THUNDERBIRD 1,045 0.20 1 1 2U C 5 5 100% 450 450 90 90 1 1 89 89 RINEY US 77 WINDSOR 1,420 0.27 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 122 122 75 75 47 47 THOMAS J EGAN 550' N OF US 380 US 380 550 0.10 1 1 2U SA 276 276 50% 450 450 23 23 14 14 9 9 THOMAS J EGAN US 380 JIM CHRISTAL 4,010 0.76 1 1 2U SA 276 276 100% 450 450 342 342 210 210 132 132 WESTERN US 380 JIM CHRISTAL 4,245 0.80 1 1 2U PA 82 82 100% 450 450 360 360 66 66 294 294 WESTGATEWESTGATEWINDSOR4,3100.82112UC11100%45045036936911368368 SUBTOTAL254,97048.2736,50136,36312,20312,40124,29823,9611,1801,22672,86324,60448,2592,4062022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area D12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBBOBCAT 560' W OF FM 2164 FM 2164 560 0.11 1 1 2U-R SA 19 19 50% 150 150 8 8 1 1 7 7 CORONADO SHERMAN BELL 1,355 0.26 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 117 117 72 72 45 45 CORONADO BELL LOCUST 1,735 0.33 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 149 149 91 91 57 57 EMERSON OLD NORTH NOTTINGHAM 2,745 0.52 1 1 2U C 7 7 100% 450 450 234 234 4 4 230 230 EMERSON NOTTINGHAMGLENWOOD 3,010 0.57 1 1 2U C 4 4 100% 450 450 257 257 2 2 254 254 EMERSON GLENWOOD WILSONWOOD 1,140 0.22 1 1 2U C 25 25 100% 450 450 99 99 6 6 94 94 FISHTRAP 270' E OF GREEN LEAF 150' E OF MINGO 2,815 0.53 1 1 2U C 203 203 100% 450 450 239 239 108 108 131 131 FM 2153 2520' W OF CEMETERY CEMETERY 2,525 0.48 1 12U-H SA 86 86 50% 725 725 174 174 21 21 153 153 GREENWOOD GLENWOOD SHERMAN 2,690 0.51 1 1 2U C 5 5 100% 450 450 230 230 3 3 227 227 GRIBBLE SPRINGS INDIAN WELLS 3015' W OF INDIAN WELLS 3,015 0.57 1 1 2U-R SA 312 312 50% 150 150 43 43 89 89 -46 -46 46 46HARTLEE FIELD 3540' E OF COOPER CREEK COOPER CREEK 3,540 0.67 1 1 2U-R SA 312 312 50% 150 150 50 50 105 105 -54 -54 54 54HARTLEE FIELD COOPER CREEK 5170' W OF COOPER CREEK 5,170 0.98 1 1 2U-R SA 18 18 50% 150 150 74 74 9 9 65 65 HARTLEE FIELD 600' E OF SHERMAN SHERMAN 600 0.11 1 1 2U-R C 2 2 50% 150 150 8 8 0 0 8 8 HERCULES SHERMAN STUART 2,960 0.56 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 252 252 155 155 97 97 HERCULES STUART REDSTONE 1,385 0.26 2 2 4D C 104 104 100% 750 750 390 390 27 27 363 363 HERCULES REDSTONE MEADOW LANE 810 0.15 1 1 2U C 104 104 100% 450 450 68 68 16 16 52 52 HERCULES MEADOW LANE LOCUST 725 0.14 1 1 3U C 104 104 100% 550 550 77 77 15 15 62 62 KINGS COOPER BRANCH DUNES 3,035 0.57 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 257 257 157 157 99 99 KINGS DUNES NOTTINGHAM 1,525 0.29 1 1 3U C 148 148 100% 550 550 160 160 43 43 117 117 KINGS NOTTINGHAM SHERMAN 1,970 0.37 1 1 3U C 148 148 100% 550 550 204 204 55 55 149 149 KINGS SHERMAN STUART 2,045 0.39 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 176 176 108 108 68 68 LONG SHERMAN BOBCAT 2,965 0.56 1 1 3U C 148 148 100% 550 550 308 308 83 83 225 225 LONG BOBCAT 1360' W OF BOBCAT 1,360 0.26 1 1 2U C 276 276 50% 450 450 59 59 36 36 23 23 LONG STUART 1600' W OF STUART 1,600 0.30 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 135 135 83 83 52 52 MINGO E CITY LIMITS COOPER CREEK 460 0.09 1 1 2U SA 130 130 100% 450 450 41 41 12 12 29 29 MINGO COOPER CREEK LOOP 288 2,305 0.44 1 1 2U SA 276 276 100% 450 450 198 198 121 121 77 77 MINGO LOOP 288 US 380 2,275 0.43 1 1 2U SA 276 276 100% 450 450 194 194 119 119 75 75 SHEPARD FM 2153 1490' W OF FM 2153 1,490 0.28 1 1 2U SA 24 24 100% 450 450 126 126 7 7 119 119 SHEPARD 1490' W OF FM 2153 4785' W OF FM 2153 3,295 0.62 1 1 2U SA 24 24 50% 450 450 140 140 7 7 132 132 SHERMAN ZACKERY FM 2153 1,715 0.32 1 1 2U-H FWY 560 560 50% 725 725 116 116 90 90 26 26 SHERMAN FM 2153 GREEN VALLEY 9,105 1.72 1 1 2U-H FWY 1,142 1,142 100% 725 725 1,247 1,247 1,964 1,964 -717 -717 717 717US 380 LAKEVIEW GEESLING 6,895 1.31 3 3 7U FWY 2,268 2,268 100% 850 850 3,341 3,341 2,971 2,971 369 369 US 380 GEESLING MAYHILL 2,920 0.55 3 3 7U PA 1,542 1,542 100% 850 850 1,403 1,403 848 848 554 554 US 380 MAYHILL LOOP 288 2,310 0.44 3 3 7U PA 1,228 1,228 100% 850 850 1,122 1,122 540 540 582 582 US 380 LOOP 288 MINGO 2,145 0.41 3 3 6D PA 1,200 1,200 50% 850 850 523 523 246 246 277 277 US 380 MINGO OLD NORTH 790 0.15 3 3 6D PA 1,317 1,317 50% 850 850 191 191 99 99 92 92 US 380 OLD NORTH NOTTINGHAM 2,465 0.47 3 3 6D PA 1,187 1,187 50% 850 850 599 599 279 279 320 320 US 380 NOTTINGHAM GLENWOOD 3,090 0.59 3 3 6D PA 1,089 1,089 50% 850 850 752 752 321 321 431 431 US 380 GLENWOOD RUDDELL 390 0.07 3 3 6D PA 984 984 50% 850 850 89 89 34 34 55 55 US 380 RUDDELL BELL 3,065 0.58 3 3 6D PA 1,042 1,042 50% 850 850 740 740 302 302 437 437 US 380 BELL LOCUST 1,495 0.28 3 3 6D PA 1,138 1,138 50% 850 850 357 357 159 159 198 198 WILSONWOOD EMERSON SHERMAN 530 0.10 1 1 2U C 24 24 100% 450 450 45 45 2 2 43 43 WINDSOR DOMINION OLD NORTH 1,390 0.26 1 1 2U C 336 336 100% 450 450 117 117 87 87 30 30 WINDSOR OLD NORTH DUNES 1,990 0.38 1 1 2U C 358 358 100% 450 450 171 171 136 136 35 35 WINDSOR DUNES NOTTINGHAM 700 0.13 1 1 2U C 110 110 100% 450 450 59 59 14 14 44 44 WINDSOR NOTTINGHAME GLENWOOD 3,375 0.64 1 1 2U C 25 25 100% 450 450 288 288 16 16 272 272 WINDSOR GLENWOOD SHERMAN 1,160 0.22 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 99 99 61 61 38 38 WINDSOR SHERMAN STUART 1,150 0.22 1 1 3U C 137 137 100% 550 550 121 121 30 30 91 91 WINDSOR STUART BELL 1,270 0.24 1 1 3U C 137 137 100% 550 550 132 132 33 33 99 99 WINDSOR BELL LOCUST 1,605 0.30 2 2 3U C 146 146 100% 550 550 330 330 44 44 286 286 BELL LOCUST WINDSOR 2,325 0.44 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 198 198 121 121 77 77 BELL WINDSOR CORONADO 1,740 0.33 1 1 2U C 276276 100% 450 450 149 149 91 91 57 57 BELL CORONADO SHERMAN 1,960 0.37 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 167 167 102 102 64 64 BELL SHERMAN US 380 1,230 0.23 1 1 2U C 67 67 100% 450 450 104 104 15 15 88 88 COLLINS 635' S OF HARTLEE FIELD 2000' S OF HARTLEE FIELD 1,375 0.26 1 1 2U-R SA 109 109 50% 150 150 20 20 14 14 5 5 COOPER CREEK SILVER DOME MINGO 4,360 0.83 1 1 2U-R PA 911 911 50% 150 150 62 62 378 378 -316 -316 316 316COOPER CREEK MINGO US 380 1,680 0.32 1 1 2U PA 1,125 1,125 100% 450 450 144 144 360 360 -216 -216 216 216DUNES KINGS WINDSOR 1,150 0.22 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 99 99 61 61 38 38 FM 2153 COSNER SHEPARD 2,780 0.53 1 1 2U-H SA 86 86 100% 725 725 384 384 46 46 339 339 FM 2153 COSNER SHEPARD 8,905 1.69 1 1 2U-H SA 86 86 50% 725 725 613 613 73 73 540 540 FM 2153 SHEPARD SHERMAN 2,635 0.50 1 1 2U-H SA 86 86 50% 725 725 181 181 22 22 160 160 FM 2164 320' S OF DOC HOLLIDAY JOHN GEORGE 6,430 1.22 1 1 2U-H PA 169 169 50% 725 725 442 442 103 103 339 339 FM 2164 KLEIN MILAM 635 0.12 1 1 2U PA 169 169 50% 450 450 27 27 10 10 17 17 FM 2164 MILAM LOOP 288 13,855 2.62 1 1 2U PA 1,049 1,049 50% 450 450 590 590 1,374 1,374 -785 -785 785 785GLENWOOD WINDSOR EMERSON 580 0.11 1 1 2U C 29 29 100% 450 450 50 50 3 3 46 46 GLENWOOD EMERSON GREENWOOD 2,325 0.44 1 1 2U C 7 7 100% 450 450 198 198 3 3 195 195 GLENWOOD GREENWOOD US 380 830 0.16 1 1 2U C 12 12 100% 450 450 72 72 2 2 70 70 GREEN VALLEY WARSCHUN SHERMAN 2,305 0.44 1 1 2U-R PA 928 928 100% 150 150 66 66 408 408 -342 -342 342 342INDIAN WELLS 2905' N OF GRIBBLE SPRINGS GRIBBLE SPRINGS 2,905 0.55 1 1 2U-R SA 34 34 50% 150 150 41 41 9 9 32 32 City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRVEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MI2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area D12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRVEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MILOCUST LOOP 288 HERCULES 2,260 0.43 1 1 2U SA 962 962 50% 450 450 97 97 207 207 -110 -110 110 110LOCUST HERCULES BELL 2,375 0.45 1 1 2U SA 715 715 50% 450 450 101 101 161 161 -60 -60 60 60LOCUST BELL WINDSOR 1,270 0.24 1 1 2U SA 499 499 50% 450 450 54 54 60 60 -6 -6 6 6LOCUST WINDSOR FM 2164 1,345 0.25 1 1 2U SA 471 471 50% 450 450 56 56 59 59 -3 -3 3 3LOCUST FM 2164 CORONADO 630 0.12 2 0 4D SA 870 0 100% 750 750 180 0 104 0 76 0 LOCUST CORONADO SHERMAN 2,420 0.46 2 0 4D SA 870 0 100% 750 750 690 0 400 0 290 0 LOCUST SHERMAN US 380 475 0.09 2 0 4D SA 1,025 0 100% 750 750 135 0 92 0 43 0 NOTTINGHAM KINGS WINDSOR 1,490 0.28 1 1 2U C 2 2 100% 450 450 126 126 1 1 125 125 NOTTINGHAM WINDSOR EMERSON 1,395 0.26 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 117 117 72 72 45 45 NOTTINGHAM EMERSON US 380 2,445 0.46 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 207 207 127 127 80 80 OLD NORTH WINDSOR EMERSON 1,585 0.30 1 1 2U C 22 22 100% 450 450 135 135 7 7 128 128 OLD NORTH EMERSON US 380 1,725 0.33 1 1 2U C 8 8 100% 450 450 149 149 3 3 146 146 SHERMAN GREEN VALLEY HARTLEE FIELD 12,485 2.36 1 1 2U-H FWY 1,305 1,305 100% 725 725 1,711 1,711 3,080 3,080 -1,369 -1,369 1,369 1,369SHERMAN HARTLEE FIELD LOOP 288 1,460 0.28 1 1 2U-H FWY 1,377 1,377 100% 725 725 203 203 386 386 -183 -183 183 183SHERMAN LOOP 288 HERCULES 1,650 0.31 2 2 4U SA 1,107 1,107 100% 550 550 341 341 343 343 -2 -2 2 2SHERMAN HERCULES KINGS 1,910 0.36 2 2 4U SA 962 962 100% 550 550 396 396 346 346 50 50 SHERMAN KINGS WINDSOR 2,025 0.38 2 2 4U SA 890 890 100% 550 550 418 418 338 338 80 80 SHERMAN WINDSOR WILSONWOOD 1,000 0.19 2 2 4U SA 826 826 100% 550 550 209 209 157 157 52 52 SHERMAN WILSONWOOD CORONADO 1,165 0.22 2 2 4U SA 823 823 100% 550 550 242 242 181 181 61 61 SHERMAN CORONADO GREENWOOD 1,640 0.31 2 2 4U SA 830 830 100% 550 550 341 341 257 257 84 84 SHERMAN GREENWOOD BELL 825 0.16 2 2 4U SA 1,038 1,038 100% 550 550 176 176 166 166 10 10 SHERMAN BELL LOCUST 1,715 0.32 2 2 4U SA 967 967 100% 550 550 352 352 309 309 43 43 STUART LAKEVIEW LOOP 288 3,105 0.59 1 1 2U C 276 276 50% 450 450 133 133 81 81 51 51 STUART LOOP 288 HERCULES 2,250 0.43 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 194 194 119 119 75 75 STUART HERCULES KINGS 1,555 0.29 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 131 131 80 80 50 50 STUART KINGS WINDSOR 1,875 0.36 1 1 2U C 276276 100% 450 450 162 162 99 99 63 63 STUARTWINDSORCORONADO1,8400.35112UC4545100%4504501581581616142142 SUBTOTAL226,58042.9127,11826,11320,27519,6786,8436,4354,2094,20953,23139,95413,2788,4182022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area E12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBAUDRA 1185' W OF LOOP 288 MOCKINGBIRD 1,445 0.27 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 122 122 75 75 47 47 AUDRA MOCKINGBIRD MOCKINGBIRD 340 0.06 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 27 27 17 17 10 10 AUDRA MOCKINGBIRD NOTTINGHAM 1,995 0.38 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 171 171 105 105 66 66 AVE A WELCH HICKORY 955 0.18 1 1 2U C 38 38 100% 450 450 81 81 7 7 74 74 BLAGG LAKEVIEWGEESLING 3,740 0.71 1 1 2U SA 276 276 100% 450 450 320 320 196 196 124 124 BLAGG GEESLING 2175' W OF GEESLING 2,175 0.41 1 1 2U SA 1 1 100% 450 450 185 185 0 0 184 184 BRINKER MEDPARK COLORADO 1,015 0.19 2 2 4D SA 756 756 100% 750 750 285 285 144 144 141 141 COLLINS FORT WORTH BERNARD 1,760 0.33 1 1 2U C 106 106 100% 450 450 149 149 35 35 114 114 CONGRESS OAKLAND LOCUST 735 0.14 1 1 2U C 14 14 100% 450 450 63 63 2 2 61 61 CONGRESS LOCUST ELM 390 0.07 1 1 2U C 109 109 100% 450 450 32 32 8 8 24 24 CONGRESS ELM BOLIVAR 445 0.08 1 1 2U C 24 24 100% 450 450 36 36 2 2 34 34 CONGRESS BOLIVAR CARROLL 615 0.12 1 1 2U C 19 19 100% 450 450 54 54 2 2 52 52 CONGRESS CARROLL FULTON 1,950 0.37 1 1 2U C 3 3 100% 450 450 167 167 1 1 165 165 CRESCENT CARROLL FULTON 1,950 0.37 1 1 2U C 43 43 100% 450 450 167 167 16 16 151 151 CRESCENT FULTON MALONE 2,095 0.40 1 1 2U C 45 45 100% 450 450 180 180 18 18 162 162 DALLAS TEASLEY IH 35E 4,590 0.87 2 2 4D PA 1,197 1,197 100% 750 750 1,305 1,305 1,041 1,041 264 264 DALLAS ALEGRE VISTA TEASLEY 945 0.18 2 2 5U PA 2,062 2,062 100% 725 725 261 261 371 371 -110 -110 110 110DALLAS EAGLE ALEGRE VISTA 3,060 0.58 2 2 5U PA 1,876 1,876 100% 725 725 841 841 1,088 1,088 -247 -247 247 247DUCHESS LOOP 288 TRAILHEAD 2,885 0.55 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 248 248 152 152 96 96 EAGLE BELL LOCUST 235 0.04 2 2 4U SA 1,742 1,742 100% 550 550 44 44 70 70 -26 -26 26 26EAGLE LOCUST ELM 530 0.10 2 2 4U SA 1,369 1,369 100% 550 550 110 110 137 137 -27 -27 27 27EAGLE ELM CARROLL 695 0.13 2 2 4U SA 443 443 100% 550 550 143 143 58 58 85 85 EAGLE CARROLL BERNARD 1,525 0.29 1 1 3U SA 148 148 100% 550 550 160 160 43 43 117 117 EAGLE BERNARD WELCH 885 0.17 1 1 3U SA 7 7 100% 550 550 94 94 1 1 92 92 EAGLE WELCH AVE A 485 0.09 1 1 3U SA 14 14 100% 550 550 50 50 1 1 48 48 EAGLE AVE A AVE C 1,460 0.28 1 1 3U SA 372 372 100% 550 550 154 154 104 104 50 50 EAGLE AVE C NORTH TEXAS 915 0.17 1 1 3U SA 148 148 100% 550 550 94 94 25 25 68 68 EDWARDS LAKEVIEW SWISHER 2,940 0.56 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 252 252 155 155 97 97 EDWARDS SWISHER MAYHILL 5,945 1.13 1 1 2U C 22 22 100% 450 450 509 509 25 25 484 484 FM 426 TRINITY MAYHILL 9,365 1.77 1 1 2U SA 229 229 100% 450 450 797 797 405 405 391 391 HICKORY RUDDELL BELL 3,280 0.62 2 0 2U C 552 0 100% 450 450 558 0 342 0 216 0 HICKORY BELL LOCUST 1,295 0.25 2 0 4D C 1,520 0 100% 750 750 375 0 380 0 -5 0 5 HICKORY LOCUST ELM 370 0.07 2 0 4D SA 169 0 100% 750 750 105 0 12 0 93 0 HICKORY ELM CARROLL 1,050 0.20 2 0 4D SA 685 0 100% 750 750 300 0 137 0 163 0 HICKORY CARROLL BERNARD 1,270 0.24 2 0 4D SA 806 0 100% 750 750 360 0 193 0 167 0 HICKORY BERNARD WELCH 865 0.16 2 0 4D SA 815 0 100% 750 750 240 0 130 0 110 0 HICKORY WELCH AVE A 665 0.13 2 0 4D SA 834 0 100% 750 750 195 0 108 0 87 0 HICKORY AVE A AVE C 1,300 0.25 2 0 4D SA 324 0 100% 750 750 375 0 81 0 294 0 HICKORY AVE C NORTH TEXAS 1,340 0.25 2 0 4D SA 962 0 100% 750 750 375 0 241 0 135 0 HICKORY NORTH TEXAS BONNIE BRAE 1,940 0.37 2 0 4D SA 1,256 0 100% 750 750 555 0 465 0 90 0 HIGHLAND BERNARD WELCH 875 0.17 1 1 2U C 147 147 100% 450 450 77 77 25 25 52 52 HIGHLAND WELCH AVE A 575 0.11 1 1 2U C 62 62 100% 450 450 50 50 7 7 43 43 HIGHLAND AVE C AVE D 660 0.13 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 59 59 36 36 23 23 HIGHLAND AVE D NORTH TEXAS 660 0.13 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 59 59 36 36 23 23 LATTIMORE AUDRA PERTAIN 2,980 0.56 1 1 2U C 10 10 100% 450 450 252 252 6 6 246 246 LOOP 288 SPENCER BRINKER 1,335 0.25 3 3 6D PA 1,577 1,577 100% 850 850 638 638 394 394 243 243 LOOP 288 BRINKER COLORADO 2,830 0.54 3 3 6D PA 1,778 1,778 100% 850 850 1,377 1,377 960 960 417 417 LOOP 288 COLORADO IH 35E 1,570 0.30 3 3 6D PA 1,827 1,827 100% 850 850 765 765 548 548 217 217 MAPLE BERNARD WELCH 885 0.17 1 1 2U C 120 120 100% 450 450 77 77 20 20 56 56 MAPLE WELCH AVE A 555 0.11 1 1 2U C 392 392 100% 450 450 50 50 43 43 6 6 MAPLE AVE A AVE C 1,405 0.27 1 1 2U C 418 418 100% 450 450 122 122 113 113 9 9 MAPLE AVE C AVE D 660 0.13 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 59 59 36 36 23 23 MCKINNEY MAYHILL LOOP 288 2,365 0.45 1 1 2U SA 276 276 100% 450 450 203 203 124 124 78 78 MCKINNEY LOOP 288 CARDINAL 670 0.13 1 1 2U SA 866 866 100% 450 450 59 59 113 113 -54 -54 54 54MCKINNEY CARDINAL MOCKINGBIRD 1,145 0.22 1 1 2U SA 865 865 100% 450 450 99 99 190 190 -91 -91 91 91MCKINNEY MOCKINGBIRD MACK 3,245 0.61 1 1 2U SA 276 276 100% 450 450 275 275 168 168 106 106 MCKINNEY MACK AUDRA 1,540 0.29 1 1 2U SA 684 684 100% 450 450 131 131 198 198 -68 -68 68 68MCKINNEY AUDRA RUDDELL 1,710 0.32 2 2 4U SA 786 786 100% 550 550 352 352 252 252 100 100 MCKINNEY RUDDELL RUDDELL 120 0.02 2 2 4U SA 792 792 100% 550 550 22 22 16 16 6 6 MCKINNEY RUDDELL BELL 2,910 0.55 2 2 4U SA 818 818 100% 550 550 605 605 450 450 155 155 MCKINNEY BELL BELL 260 0.05 2 2 4U SA 1,042 1,042 100% 550 550 55 55 52 52 3 3 MCKINNEY BELL LOCUST 1,285 0.24 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 264 264 154 154 110 110 MCKINNEY LOCUST ELM 380 0.07 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 77 77 45 45 32 32 MCKINNEY ELM CARROLL 1,090 0.21 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 231 231 134 134 97 97 MILLS TRINITY MAYHILL 7,415 1.40 1 1 2U SA 0 0 100% 450 450 630 630 0 0 630 630 MINGO US 380 OLD NORTH 760 0.14 1 1 2U SA 276 276 100% 450 450 63 63 39 39 24 24 MINGO OLD NORTH NOTTINGHAM 2,545 0.48 1 1 2U SA 263 263 100% 450 450 216 216 126 126 90 90 MINGO NOTTINGHAM PERTAIN 2,935 0.56 1 1 2U SA 46 46 100% 450 450 252 252 26 26 226 226 MINGO PERTAIN RUDDELL 945 0.18 1 1 2U SA 101 101 100% 450 450 81 81 18 18 63 63 City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRVEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MI2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area E12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRVEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MIMINGO RUDDELL WILLIS 600 0.11 1 1 2U SA 164 164 100% 450 450 50 50 18 18 31 31 MINGO WILLIS WITHERS 2,305 0.44 1 1 2U SA 261 261 100% 450 450 198 198 115 115 83 83 MINGO WITHERS PAISLEY 235 0.04 1 1 2U SA 267 267 100% 450 450 18 18 11 11 7 7 MINGO PAISLEY BELL 985 0.19 1 1 2U SA 299 299 100% 450 450 86 86 57 57 29 29 MORSE MAYHILL KIMBERLY 1,145 0.22 1 1 2U SA 721 721 100% 450 450 99 99 159 159 -60 -60 60 60MORSE KIMBERLY LOOP 288 920 0.17 2 2 4D SA 721 721 100% 750 P 255 123 123 132 MORSE WOODROW NEWTON 1,460 0.28 1 1 2U C 7 7 100% 450 450 126 126 2 2 124 124 MORSE NEWTON LAKEY 2,305 0.44 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 198 198 121 121 77 77 MULBERRY ELM CARROLL 1,045 0.20 1 1 2U C 1 1 100% 450 450 90 90 0 0 90 90 MULBERRY CARROLL BERNARD 1,315 0.25 1 1 2U C 15 15 100% 450 450 113 113 4 4 109 109 MULBERRY BERNARD WELCH 870 0.16 1 1 2U C 3 3 100% 450 450 72 72 0 0 72 72 OAK BELL LOCUST 1,290 0.24 0 2 4D C 0 1,520 100% 750 750 0 360 0 365 0 -5 5OAK LOCUST ELM 380 0.07 0 2 4D SA 0 410 100% 750 750 0 105 0 29 0 76 OAK ELM BOLIVAR 460 0.09 0 2 4D SA 0 524 100% 750 750 0 135 0 47 0 88 OAK BOLIVAR CARROLL 595 0.11 0 2 4D SA 0 525 100% 750 750 0 165 0 58 0 107 OAK CARROLL FULTON 1,900 0.36 0 2 4D SA 0 477 100% 750 750 0 540 0 172 0 368 OAK FULTON WELCH 225 0.04 0 2 4D SA 0 560 100% 750 750 0 60 0 22 0 38 OAK WELCH FRY 675 0.13 0 2 4D SA 0 560 100% 750 750 0 195 0 73 0 122 OAK FRY AVE C 1,280 0.24 0 2 4D SA 0 556 100% 750 750 0 360 0 133 0 227 OAK JAGOE NORTH TEXAS 1,355 0.26 0 2 4D SA 0 556 100% 750 750 0 390 0 145 0 245 OAK NORTH TEXAS BONNIE BRAE 1,935 0.37 0 2 4D SA 0 849 100% 750 750 0 555 0 314 0 241 PAISLEY MOCKINGBIRD MACK 2,895 0.55 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 248 248 152 152 96 96 PAISLEY MACK AUDRA 835 0.16 1 1 2U C 205 205 100% 450 450 72 72 33 33 39 39 PAISLEY AUDRA RUDDELL 2,840 0.54 1 1 2U C 15 15 100% 450 450 243 243 8 8 235 235 PAISLEY RUDDELL FRAME 2,135 0.40 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 180 180 110 110 70 70 PARKWAY LOCUST ELM 390 0.07 2 2 4U C 0 0 100% 550 550 77 77 0 0 77 77 PARKWAY ELM BOLIVAR 450 0.09 2 2 4U C 3 3 100% 550 550 99 99 0 0 99 99 PARKWAY BOLIVAR CARROLL 615 0.12 2 2 4U C 3 3 100% 550 550 132 132 0 0 132 132 POCKRUS PAGE POST OAK IH 35E 5,535 1.05 1 1 2U C 355 355 100% 450 450 473 473 373 373 100 100 PRAIRIE BELL LAKEY 1,850 0.35 1 1 2U C 0 0 100% 450 450 158 158 0 0 158 158 PRAIRIE NORTH TEXAS BONNIE BRAE 1,945 0.37 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 167 167 102 102 64 64 PROMINENCE MAYHILL 1095' E OF LOOP 288 1,260 0.24 1 1 2U C 1 1 100% 450 450 108 108 0 0 108 108 PROMINENCE 1095' E OF LOOP 288 LOOP 288 1,095 0.21 1 1 3U C 1 1 100% 550 550 116 116 0 0 115 115 ROBERTSON BELL DUNCAN 2,215 0.42 1 1 2U C 36 36 100% 450 450 189 189 15 15 174 174 RUSSELL NEWMAN MAYHILL LOOP 288 2,230 0.42 1 1 3U C 148 148 100% 550 550 231 231 62 62 169 169 SAN JACINTO COLORADO DALLAS 2,275 0.43 2 2 4D SA 168 168 100% 750 750 645 645 72 72 573 573 SCRIPTURE FULTON MALONE 2,415 0.46 1 1 2U C 51 51 100% 450 450 207 207 23 23 184 184 SCRIPTURE MALONE ECTOR 1,405 0.27 1 1 2U C 8 8 100% 450 450 122 122 2 2 119 119 SCRIPTURE ECTOR BONNIE BRAE 2,095 0.40 1 1 2U C 84 84 100% 450 450 180 180 34 34 146 146 SHADY OAKS LOOP 288 WOODROW 7,230 1.37 2 2 4D SA 200 200 100% 750 750 2,055 2,055 274 274 1,781 1,781 SHADY OAKS WOODROW TEASLEY 3,070 0.58 1 1 3U SA 80 80 100% 550 550 319 319 46 46 273 273 SPENCER MAYHILL LOOP 288 2,315 0.44 1 1 2U SA 620 620 100% 450 450 198 198 273 273 -75 -75 75 75SPENCER LOOP 288 BRINKER 1,205 0.23 2 2 4U SA 185 185 100% 550 550 253 253 43 43 210 210 SPENCER BRINKER WOODROW 5,320 1.01 2 2 4U SA 171 171 100% 550 550 1,111 1,111 173 173 938 938 TREATMENT PLANT 1325' W OF POST OAK MAYHILL 3,960 0.75 1 1 2U SA 0 0 100% 450 450 338 338 0 0 338 338 US 380 US 377 LAKEVIEW 8,120 1.54 3 3 7U FWY 2,269 2,269 100% 850 850 3,927 3,927 3,494 3,494 433 433 US 380 LOOP 288 MINGO 2,145 0.41 3 3 6D PA 1,200 1,200 50% 850 850 523 523 246 246 277 277 US 380 MINGO OLD NORTH 790 0.15 3 3 6D PA 1,317 1,317 50% 850 850 191 191 99 99 92 92 US 380 OLD NORTH NOTTINGHAM 2,465 0.47 3 3 6D PA 1,187 1,187 50% 850 850 599 599 279 279 320 320 US 380 NOTTINGHAM GLENWOOD 3,090 0.59 3 3 6D PA 1,089 1,089 50% 850 850 752 752 321 321 431 431 US 380 GLENWOOD RUDDELL 390 0.07 3 3 6D PA 984 984 50% 850 850 89 89 34 34 55 55 US 380 RUDDELL BELL 3,065 0.58 3 3 6D PA 1,042 1,042 50% 850 850 740 740 302 302 437 437 US 380 BELL LOCUST 1,495 0.28 3 3 6D PA 1,138 1,138 50% 850 850 357 357 159 159 198 198 US 380 LOCUST ELM 410 0.08 3 3 6D PA 1,251 1,251 50% 850 850 102 102 50 50 52 52 US 380 ELM BOLIVAR 380 0.07 3 3 6D PA 1,077 1,077 50% 850 850 89 89 38 38 52 52 US 380 BOLIVAR CARROLL 680 0.13 3 3 6D PA 1,076 1,076 50% 850 850 166 166 70 70 96 96 US 380 CARROLL FULTON 1,955 0.37 3 3 6D PA 1,017 1,017 50% 850 850 472 472 188 188 284 284 US 380 FULTON HINKLE 475 0.09 3 3 6D PA 856 856 50% 850 850 115 115 39 39 76 76 US 380 HINKLE MALONE 1,545 0.29 3 3 6D PA 856 856 50% 850 850 370 370 124 124 246 246 US 380 MALONE ECTOR 1,595 0.30 3 3 6D PA 856 856 50% 850 850 383 383 128 128 254 254 US 380 ECTOR BONNIE BRAE 1,865 0.35 3 3 6D PA 890 890 50% 850 850 446 446 156 156 291 291 WELCH BERNARD WELCH 1,380 0.26 1 1 2U C 211 211 100% 450 450 117 117 55 55 62 62 WILLIS RUDDELL MINGO 545 0.10 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 45 45 28 28 17 17 WITHERS MINGO BELL 655 0.12 1 1 2U C 27 27 100% 450 450 54 54 3 3 51 51 WITHERS BELL OAKLAND 810 0.15 1 1 2U C 43 43 100% 450 450 68 68 6 6 61 61 BERNARD COLLINS IH 35E 2,275 0.43 1 1 2U C 70 70 100% 450 450 194 194 30 30 163 163 DUNCAN MORSE TEASLEY 2,865 0.54 1 1 2U C 72 72 100% 450 450 243 243 39 39 204 204 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area E12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRVEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MIAUDRA NOTTINGHAM LATTIMORE 1,260 0.24 2 2 4U SA 263 263 100% 550 550 264 264 63 63 201 201 AUDRA LATTIMORE PAISLEY 1,755 0.33 2 2 4U SA 347 347 100% 550 550 363 363 115 115 248 248 AUDRA PAISLEY 1385' N OF MCKINNEY 805 0.15 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 165 165 96 96 69 69 AUDRA 1385' N OF MCKINNEY MCKINNEY 1,385 0.26 2 2 4D SA 760 760 100% 750 750 390 390 198 198 192 192 AVE A HIGHLAND MAPLE 405 0.08 1 1 2U C 61 61 100% 450 450 36 36 5 5 31 31 AVE A MAPLE EAGLE 575 0.11 2 2 4U C 70 70 100% 550 550 121 121 8 8 113 113 AVE A EAGLE IH 35E 1,875 0.36 2 2 4U SA 9 9 100% 550 550 396 396 3 3 393 393 AVE C OAK HICKORY 395 0.07 2 2 4U C 640 640 100% 550 550 77 77 45 45 32 32 AVE C HIGHLAND MAPLE 400 0.08 1 1 2D C 600 600 100% 550 550 44 44 48 48 -4 -4 4 4AVE C MAPLE EAGLE 540 0.10 1 1 2D C 600 600 100% 550 550 55 55 60 60 -5 -5 5 5AVE D HIGHLAND MAPLE 395 0.07 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 32 32 19 19 12 12 BELL US 380 COLLEGE 2,255 0.43 1 1 2D SA 600 600 100% 550 550 237 237 258 258 -22 -22 22 22BELL COLLEGE WITHERS 1,250 0.24 1 1 3U SA 148 148 100% 550 550 132 132 36 36 96 96 BELL WITHERS PAISLEY 245 0.05 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 55 55 32 32 23 23 BELL PAISLEY MINGO 820 0.16 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 176 176 102 102 74 74 BELL MINGO MCKINNEY 705 0.13 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 143 143 83 83 60 60 BELL MINGO MCKINNEY 650 0.12 1 1 2U C 299 299 100% 450 450 54 54 36 36 18 18 BELL MCKINNEY OAK 340 0.06 2 2 4U SA 1,042 1,042 100% 550 550 66 66 63 63 3 3 BELL OAK HICKORY 380 0.07 2 2 4U SA 1,042 1,042 100% 550 550 77 77 73 73 4 4 BELL HICKORY PRAIRIE 1,635 0.31 2 2 4U SA 1,113 1,113 100% 550 550 341 341 345 345 -4 -4 4 4BELL PRAIRIE ROBERTSON 655 0.12 2 2 4U SA 1,337 1,337 100% 550 550 132 132 160 160 -28 -28 28 28BELL ROBERTSON EAGLE 990 0.19 2 2 4U SA 1,273 1,273 100% 550 550 209 209 242 242 -33 -33 33 33BERNARD HICKORY MULBERRY 390 0.07 1 1 2U C 5 5 100% 450 450 32 32 0 0 31 31 BERNARD MULBERRY HIGHLAND 1,555 0.29 1 1 2U C 5 5 100% 450 450 131 131 1 1 129 129 BERNARD HIGHLAND MAPLE 420 0.08 1 1 2U C 156 156 100% 450 450 36 36 12 12 24 24 BERNARD MAPLE EAGLE 580 0.11 1 1 2U C 51 51 100% 450 450 50 50 6 6 44 44 BERNARD EAGLE COLLINS 885 0.17 1 1 2U C 0 0 100% 450 450 77 77 0 0 77 77 BOLIVAR US 380 PANHANDLE 3,475 0.66 1 1 2U C 0 0 100% 450 450 297 297 0 0 297 297 BOLIVAR PANHANDLE CONGRESS 740 0.14 1 1 2U C 3 3 100% 450 450 63 63 0 0 63 63 BOLIVAR CONGRESS PARKWAY 450 0.09 1 1 2U C 1 1 100% 450 450 41 41 0 0 40 40 BOLIVAR PARKWAY OAK 895 0.17 1 1 2U C 1 1 100% 450 450 77 77 0 0 76 76 BONNIE BRAE US 380 PANHANDLE 2,910 0.55 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 303 303 241 241 61 61 BONNIE BRAE PANHANDLE SCRIPTURE 1,070 0.20 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 110 110 88 88 22 22 BONNIE BRAE SCRIPTURE OAK 1,180 0.22 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 121 121 96 96 25 25 BONNIE BRAE OAK HICKORY 380 0.07 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 39 39 31 31 8 8 BONNIE BRAE HICKORY PRAIRIE 1,425 0.27 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 149 149 118 118 30 30 BONNIE BRAE PRAIRIE IH 35E 860 0.16 2 2 4U SA 877 877 50% 550 550 88 88 70 70 18 18 BRINKER SPENCER LOOP 288 1,080 0.20 2 2 4D SA 821 821 100% 750 750 300 300 164 164 136 136 BRINKER LOOP 288 MEDPARK 3,070 0.58 2 2 4D SA 788 788 100% 750 750 870 870 457 457 413 413 BRINKER COLORADO IH 35E 740 0.14 2 2 4D SA 756 756 100% 750 750 210 210 106 106 104 104 CARDINAL 995' N OF ORIOLE ORIOLE 995 0.19 1 1 2U C 260 260 100% 450 450 86 86 49 49 36 36 CARDINAL ORIOLE MCKINNEY 1,815 0.34 1 1 2U C 1 1 100% 450 450 153 153 0 0 153 153 CARROLL US 380 CRESCENT 2,015 0.38 3 3 6D PA 1,439 1,439 100% 850 850 969 969 547 547 422 422 CARROLL CRESCENT PANHANDLE 1,465 0.28 3 3 6D PA 1,480 1,480 100% 850 850 714 714 414 414 300 300 CARROLL PANHANDLE CONGRESS 760 0.14 3 3 6D PA 1,480 1,480 100% 850 850 357 357 207 207 150 150 CARROLL CONGRESS PARKWAY 390 0.07 3 3 6D PA 1,701 1,701 100% 850 850 179 179 119 119 59 59 CARROLL PARKWAY OAK 955 0.18 3 3 6D PA 1,734 1,734 100% 850 850 459 459 312 312 147 147 CARROLL OAK HICKORY 380 0.07 3 3 6D PA 1,649 1,649 100% 850 850 179 179 115 115 63 63 CARROLL HICKORY MULBERRY 380 0.07 3 3 6D PA 1,508 1,508 100% 850 850 179 179 106 106 73 73 CARROLL MULBERRY EAGLE 2,575 0.49 3 3 6D PA 1,565 1,565 100% 850 850 1,250 1,250 767 767 483 483 CARROLL EAGLE COLLINS 880 0.17 3 3 6D PA 1,646 1,646 100% 850 850 434 434 280 280 154 154 CENTRE PLACE DALLAS IH 35E 2,760 0.52 1 1 2U C 3 3 100% 450 450 234 234 2 2 232 232 COLORADO SPENCER SAN JACINTO 3,215 0.61 2 2 4U SA 132 132 100% 550 550 671 671 81 81 590 590 COLORADO SAN JACINTO LOOP 288 1,920 0.36 2 2 4D SA 760 760 100% 750 750 540 540 274 274 266 266 COLORADO BRINKER LOOP 288 2,840 0.54 2 2 4D SA 760 760 100% 750 750 810 810 410 410 400 400 COLORADO MEDPARK BRINKER 2,155 0.41 2 2 4D SA 760 760 100% 750 750 615 615 312 312 303 303 COLORADO MAYHILL MEDPARK 1,495 0.28 2 2 4D SA 760 760 100% 750 750 420 420 213 213 207 207 ECTOR US 380 PANHANDLE 2,835 0.54 1 1 2U C 35 35 100% 450 450 243 243 19 19 224 224 ECTOR PANHANDLE SCRIPTURE 1,030 0.20 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 90 90 55 55 35 35 ELM US 380 CONGRESS 4,200 0.80 0 2 4D SA 513 513 100% 750 750 0 1,200 410 410 -410 790 410 ELM CONGRESS PARKWAY 445 0.08 0 2 6D SA 532 532 100% 850 850 0 102 43 43 -43 59 43 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area E12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRVEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MIELM PARKWAY MCKINNEY 535 0.10 0 2 6D SA 534 534 100% 850 850 0 128 53 53 -53 74 53 ELM MCKINNEY OAK 375 0.07 0 2 4D SA 534 534 100% 750 750 0 105 37 37 -37 68 37 ELM OAK HICKORY 380 0.07 0 2 4D SA 477 477 100% 750 750 0 105 33 33 -33 72 33 ELM HICKORY MULBERRY 375 0.07 0 2 4D SA 737 737 100% 750 750 0 105 52 52 -52 53 52 ELM MULBERRY EAGLE 2,570 0.49 0 2 4D SA 542 542 100% 750 750 0 735 266 266 -266 469 266 FORT WORTH EAGLE CARROLL 965 0.18 2 2 4U SA 393 393 100% 550 550 198 198 71 71 127 127 FORT WORTH COLLINS IH 35E 3,035 0.57 3 3 6D PA 1,661 1,661 100% 850 850 1,454 1,454 947 947 507 507 FRY OAK HICKORY 380 0.07 1 1 2U C 247 247 100% 450 450 32 32 17 17 14 14 FULTON US 380 CRESCENT 1,520 0.29 1 1 2U C 265 265 100% 450 450 131 131 77 77 54 54 FULTON CRESCENT PANHANDLE 1,500 0.28 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 126 126 77 77 49 49 FULTON PANHANDLE CONGRESS 720 0.14 1 1 2U C 143 143 100% 450 450 63 63 20 20 43 43 FULTON CONGRESS OAK 1,370 0.26 1 1 2U C 22 22 100% 450 450 117 117 6 6 111 111 GEESLING US 380 BLAGG 2,445 0.46 1 1 2U PA 974 974 100% 450 450 207 207 448 448 -241 -241 241 241JAGOE SCRIPTURE OAK 1,115 0.21 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 95 95 58 58 37 37 LAKEVIEW POST OAK SHADY SHORES 1,385 0.26 2 2 4D PA 760 760 100% 750 750 390 390 198 198 192 192 LAKEY PRAIRIE MORSE 1,535 0.29 1 1 2U C 12 12 100% 450 450 131 131 3 3 127 127 LOCUST US 380 OAKLAND 1,285 0.24 2 0 4D SA 668 668 100% 750 750 360 0 160 160 200 -160 160LOCUST OAKLAND CONGRESS 2,905 0.55 2 0 4D SA 488 488 100% 750 750 825 0 268 268 557 -268 268LOCUST CONGRESS PARKWAY 415 0.08 2 0 4D SA 503 503 100% 750 750 120 0 40 40 80 -40 40LOCUST PARKWAY MCKINNEY 565 0.11 2 0 4D SA 503 503 100% 750 750 165 0 55 55 110 -55 55LOCUST MCKINNEY OAK 390 0.07 2 0 4D SA 503 503 100% 750 750 105 0 35 35 70 -35 35LOCUST OAK HICKORY 375 0.07 2 0 4D SA 708 708 100% 750 750 105 0 50 50 55 -50 50LOCUST HICKORY EAGLE 2,920 0.55 2 0 4D SA 479 479 100% 750 750 825 0 263 263 562 -263 263LOOP 288 US 380 AUDRA 1,765 0.33 3 3 6D PA 1,200 1,200 100% 850 850 842 842 396 396 446 446 LOOP 288 AUDRA PROMINENCE 600 0.11 3 3 6D PA 1,726 1,726 100% 850 850 281 281 190 190 91 91 LOOP 288 PROMINENCE RUSSELL NEWMAN 2,560 0.48 3 3 6D PA 1,679 1,679 100% 850 850 1,224 1,224 806 806 418 418 LOOP 288 RUSSELL NEWMAN ORIOLE 565 0.11 3 3 6D PA 1,689 1,689 100% 850 850 281 281 186 186 95 95 LOOP 288 ORIOLE MCKINNEY 1,845 0.35 3 3 6D PA 1,724 1,724 100% 850 850 893 893 603 603 289 289 LOOP 288 MCKINNEY MORSE 2,970 0.56 3 3 6D PA 1,736 1,736 100% 850 850 1,428 1,428 972 972 456 456 LOOP 288 MORSE SPENCER 3,510 0.66 3 3 6D PA 1,424 1,424 100% 850 850 1,683 1,683 940 940 743 743 MACK PAISLEY MCKINNEY 1,970 0.37 1 1 2U C 198 198 100% 450 450 167 167 73 73 93 93 MALONE US 380 CRESCENT 960 0.18 1 1 3U C 148 148 100% 550 550 99 99 27 27 72 72 MALONE CRESCENT PANHANDLE 1,875 0.36 1 1 3U C 148 148 100% 550 550 198 198 53 53 145 145 MALONE PANHANDLE SCRIPTURE 1,120 0.21 1 13U C 148 148 100% 550 550 116 116 31 31 84 84 MAYHILL US 380 PROMINENCE 2,335 0.44 2 2 4D PA 1,437 1,437 100% 750 750 660 660 632 632 28 28 MAYHILL PROMINENCE 770' N OF RUSSELL NEWMAN 2,040 0.39 2 2 4D PA 1,437 1,437 100% 750 750 585 585 560 560 25 25 MAYHILL 770' N OF RUSSELL NEWMAN RUSSELL NEWMAN 775 0.15 2 2 4D PA 1,437 1,437 50% 750 750 113 113 108 108 5 5 MAYHILL RUSSELL NEWMAN 460' S OF RUSSELL NEWMAN 460 0.09 2 2 4D PA 1,533 1,533 50% 750 750 68 68 69 69 -1 -1 1 1MAYHILL 460' S OF RUSSELL NEWMAN MILLS 1,080 0.20 2 2 4D PA 1,533 1,533 100% 750 750 300 300 307 307 -7 -7 7 7MAYHILL MILLS MCKINNEY 1,955 0.37 2 2 4D PA 1,608 1,608 100% 750 750 555 555 595 595 -40 -40 40 40MAYHILL MCKINNEY MORSE 2,045 0.39 2 2 4D PA 1,865 1,865 100% 750 750 585 585 727 727 -142 -142 142 142MAYHILL MORSE SPENCER 3,520 0.67 2 2 4D PA 1,501 1,501 100% 750 750 1,005 1,005 1,006 1,006 -1 -1 1 1MAYHILL SPENCER EDWARDS 3,185 0.60 2 2 4D PA 2,037 2,037 100% 750 750 900 900 1,222 1,222 -322 -322 322 322MAYHILL QUAILCREEK EDWARDS 1,560 0.30 1 1 2U C 1,116 1,116 100% 450 450 135 135 335 335 -200 -200 200 200MAYHILL EDWARDS COLORADO 515 0.10 2 2 4U C 1,138 1,138 100% 550 550 110 110 114 114 -4 -4 4 4MAYHILL COLORADO IH 35E 2,330 0.44 2 2 4D PA 2,774 2,774 100% 750 750 660 660 1,221 1,221 -561 -561 561 561MEDPARK BRINKER COLORADO 2,140 0.41 1 1 3U C 148 148 100% 550 550 226 226 61 61 165 165 MEDPARK COLORADO IH 35E 1,360 0.26 1 1 3U C 148 148 100% 550 550 143 143 38 38 105 105 MOCKINGBIRD MINGO AUDRA 1,890 0.36 1 1 2U C 276 276 100% 450 450 162 162 99 99 63 63 MOCKINGBIRD AUDRA PAISLEY 2,895 0.55 1 1 2U C 15 15 100% 450 450 248 248 8 8 239 239 MOCKINGBIRD PAISLEY ORIOLE 940 0.18 1 1 2U C 91 91 100% 450 450 81 81 16 16 65 65 MOCKINGBIRD ORIOLE MCKINNEY 1,670 0.32 1 1 2U C 91 91 100% 450 450 144 144 29 29 115 115 MOCKINGBIRD 625' N OF DUCHESS DUCHESS 625 0.12 1 1 2U SA 137 137 100% 450 450 54 54 16 16 38 38 NORTH TEXAS OAK HICKORY 360 0.07 1 1 2U SA 216 216 100% 450 450 32 32 15 15 16 16 NORTH TEXAS HICKORY PRAIRIE 1,425 0.27 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 297 297 173 173 124 124 NORTH TEXAS PRAIRIE HIGHLAND 520 0.10 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 110 110 64 64 46 46 NORTH TEXAS HIGHLAND EAGLE 1,265 0.24 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 264 264 154 154 110 110 NORTH TEXAS EAGLE IH 35E 750 0.14 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 154 154 90 90 64 64 NOTTINGHAM US 380 MINGO 1,820 0.34 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 374 374 218 218 156 156 NOTTINGHAM MINGO AUDRA 1,060 0.20 2 2 4U SA 263 263 100% 550 550 220 220 53 53 167 167 OAKLAND LOCUST WITHERS 2,775 0.53 1 1 2U C 1 1 100% 450 450 239 239 1 1 238 238 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory Service Area E12/7/2023% INROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST CLASS PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY(ft) (mi) LANES AREANB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBNB/EBSB/WBCity of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyExisting Roadway Facilities InventoryEXISTLANESPMVEH-MIVEH-MIVEH-MIEXCESSEXISTINGSUPPLYDEMANDCAPACITYDEFICIENCIESHOURPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRPK-HRVEH-MIVOLPER LNTOTALTOTALVEH-MIOAKLAND WITHERS CONGRESS 680 0.13 1 1 2U C 15 15 100% 450 450 59 59 2 2 57 57 OLD NORTH US 380 MINGO 600 0.11 1 1 2U C 263 263 100% 450 450 50 50 29 29 21 21 PERTAIN MINGO LATTIMORE 805 0.15 1 1 2U C 2 2 100% 450 450 68 68 0 0 67 67 POST OAK POCKRUS PAGE LAKEVIEW 1,240 0.23 1 1 2U PA 276 276 100% 450 450 104 104 63 63 40 40 RUDDELL US 380 MINGO 2,460 0.47 1 1 2U C 62 62 100% 450 450 212 212 29 29 182 182 RUDDELL WILLIS PAISLEY 1,455 0.28 1 1 2U C 17 17 100% 450 450 126 126 5 5 121 121 RUDDELL PAISLEY MCKINNEY 1,580 0.30 1 1 2U C 48 48 100% 450 450 135 135 14 14 121 121 RUDDELL MCKINNEY HICKORY 590 0.11 1 1 2U C 0 0 100% 450 450 50 50 0 0 50 50 RUDDELL HICKORY MORSE 3,255 0.62 1 1 2U C 8 8 100% 450 450 279 279 5 5 274 274 TEASLEY SHADY OAKS DALLAS 860 0.16 2 2 4D SA 760 760 100% 750 750 240 240 122 122 118 118 TEASLEY DALLAS IH 35E 1,870 0.35 2 2 4D PA 1,045 1,045 100% 750 750 525 525 366 366 159 159 WELCH OAK HICKORY 380 0.07 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 77 77 45 45 32 32 WELCH HICKORY MULBERRY 350 0.07 2 2 4U SA 277 277 100% 550 550 77 77 19 19 58 58 WELCH MULBERRY HIGHLAND 1,570 0.30 2 2 4U SA 187 187 100% 550 550 330 330 56 56 274 274 WELCH HIGHLAND MAPLE 400 0.08 2 2 4U SA 182 182 100% 550 550 88 88 15 15 73 73 WELCH MAPLE EAGLE 575 0.11 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 121 121 70 70 51 51 WELCH EAGLE COLLINS 925 0.18 2 2 4U C 640 640 100% 550 550 198 198 115 115 83 83 WOODROW MCKINNEY MORSE 3,910 0.74 2 2 5U SA 1,960 1,960 100% 725 725 1,073 1,073 1,450 1,450 -377 -377 377 377WOODROW MORSE SHADY OAKS 1,305 0.25 2 2 4U SA 640 640 100% 550 550 275 275 160 160 115 115 WOODROW SHADY OAKS SPENCER 475 0.09 2 2 5U SA 1,960 1,960 100% 725 725 131 131 176 176 -46 -46 46 46SUBTOTAL158,685 30.0920,658 19,830 11,737 11,004 8,921 8,948 3,695 3,67240,488 22,741 17,870 7,3672022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix C - Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas Appendix D – Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit Summary (as prepared by NewGen Strategies.) SUMMARY OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs 88,707,667$ Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study Financing Cost 43,092,001 See Detail Below Existing Fund Balance (4,394,807) Roadway Appendices - page 1 Interest Earnings (21,126,791) Roadway Appendices - page 4 Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee 106,278,070$ Sum of Above Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues (6,535,564) Roadway Appendices - page 7 Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee 99,742,506$ Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs: Represents the portion of capital improvement costs that are eligible for funding through Impact fees. Reference is the Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study. Financing Costs: Represents the interest costs associated with debt financing the new Impact fee project costs. Interest costs are derived from existing debt issues and forecasted debt issues. New Annual Debt Service 114,028,007$ Roadway Appendices - page 2 Existing Annual Debt Service - Roadway Appendices - page 3 Principal Component (New and Existing Debt) (70,936,006) Roadway Appendices - page 1 Financing Costs 43,092,001$ Existing Fund Balance: Represents impact fee revenue collected but not yet expended. To avoid charging twice for the same project, the impact fee revenues collected but yet to be expended (i.e. fund balance) are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is page 1 of Roadway Appendices. Interest Earnings: Represents the interest earned on cash flows and assumes a 2.00% annual interest rate. The Impact Fee Statute states that interest earnings are funds of the Impact fee account and are held to the same restrictions as Impact fee revenues. Therefore in order to recognize that interest earnings are used to fund capital improvements, interest earnings are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is the sum of Accumulated Interest on page 4 of Roadway Appendices. Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee: Represents Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs plus Financing Costs less Existing Fund Balance and Interest Earnings. Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues: In 2001, the LGC Chapter 395 was amended to include a credit for ad valorem and utility revenues generated by new service units during the ten-year timeframe that are used to fund Impact fee eligible projects for which the new service units were charged an Impact fee. The intent of this amendment is to avoid double-charging the new service units for Impact fee capital improvements. The credit recognizes ad valorem revenues used to fund the debt service of debt financed Impact fee eligible projects and assumes that all non-debt funded impact fee eligible project costs will be funded solely through impact fee revenues or non-ad valorem revenue sources. Reference is page 7 of Roadway Appendices. Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee: Represents Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee less Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues. This is the maximum cost that can be recovered through Impact fees. Service Area A 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Roadway Appendices SUMMARY OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs 52,791,687$ Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study Financing Cost 24,683,794 See Detail Below Existing Fund Balance (2,004,188) Roadway Appendices - page 1 Interest Earnings (12,622,463) Roadway Appendices - page 4 Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee 62,848,830$ Sum of Above Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues (1,580,744) Roadway Appendices - page 7 Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee 61,268,086$ Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs: Represents the portion of capital improvement costs that are eligible for funding through Impact fees. Reference is the Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study. Financing Costs: Represents the interest costs associated with debt financing the new Impact fee project costs. Interest costs are derived from existing debt issues and forecasted debt issues. New Annual Debt Service 64,669,539$ Roadway Appendices - page 2 Existing Annual Debt Service 1,170,764 Roadway Appendices - page 3 Principal Component (New and Existing Debt) (41,156,509) Roadway Appendices - page 1 Financing Costs 24,683,794$ Existing Fund Balance: Represents impact fee revenue collected but not yet expended. To avoid charging twice for the same project, the impact fee revenues collected but yet to be expended (i.e. fund balance) are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is page 1 of Roadway Appendices. Interest Earnings: Represents the interest earned on cash flows and assumes a 2.00% annual interest rate. The Impact Fee Statute states that interest earnings are funds of the Impact fee account and are held to the same restrictions as Impact fee revenues. Therefore in order to recognize that interest earnings are used to fund capital improvements, interest earnings are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is the sum of Accumulated Interest on page 4 of Roadway Appendices. Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee: Represents Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs plus Financing Costs less Existing Fund Balance and Interest Earnings. Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues: In 2001, the LGC Chapter 395 was amended to include a credit for ad valorem and utility revenues generated by new service units during the ten-year timeframe that are used to fund Impact fee eligible projects for which the new service units were charged an Impact fee. The intent of this amendment is to avoid double-charging the new service units for Impact fee capital improvements. The credit recognizes ad valorem revenues used to fund the debt service of debt financed Impact fee eligible projects and assumes that all non-debt funded impact fee eligible project costs will be funded solely through impact fee revenues or non-ad valorem revenue sources. Reference is page 7 of Roadway Appendices. Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee: Represents Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee less Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues. This is the maximum cost that can be recovered through Impact fees. Service Area B 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Roadway Appendices SUMMARY OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs 126,409,861$ Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study Financing Cost 61,414,578 See Detail Below Existing Fund Balance (3,170,473) Roadway Appendices - page 1 Interest Earnings (30,142,851) Roadway Appendices - page 4 Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee 154,511,114$ Sum of Above Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues (7,396,751) Roadway Appendices - page 7 Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee 147,114,363$ Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs: Represents the portion of capital improvement costs that are eligible for funding through Impact fees. Reference is the Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study. Financing Costs: Represents the interest costs associated with debt financing the new Impact fee project costs. Interest costs are derived from existing debt issues and forecasted debt issues. New Annual Debt Service 162,512,338$ Roadway Appendices - page 2 Existing Annual Debt Service - Roadway Appendices - page 3 Principal Component (New and Existing Debt) (101,097,761) Roadway Appendices - page 1 Financing Costs 61,414,578$ Existing Fund Balance: Represents impact fee revenue collected but not yet expended. To avoid charging twice for the same project, the impact fee revenues collected but yet to be expended (i.e. fund balance) are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is page 1 of Roadway Appendices. Interest Earnings: Represents the interest earned on cash flows and assumes a 2.00% annual interest rate. The Impact Fee Statute states that interest earnings are funds of the Impact fee account and are held to the same restrictions as Impact fee revenues. Therefore in order to recognize that interest earnings are used to fund capital improvements, interest earnings are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is the sum of Accumulated Interest on page 4 of Roadway Appendices. Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee: Represents Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs plus Financing Costs less Existing Fund Balance and Interest Earnings. Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues: In 2001, the LGC Chapter 395 was amended to include a credit for ad valorem and utility revenues generated by new service units during the ten-year timeframe that are used to fund Impact fee eligible projects for which the new service units were charged an Impact fee. The intent of this amendment is to avoid double-charging the new service units for Impact fee capital improvements. The credit recognizes ad valorem revenues used to fund the debt service of debt financed Impact fee eligible projects and assumes that all non-debt funded impact fee eligible project costs will be funded solely through impact fee revenues or non-ad valorem revenue sources. Reference is page 7 of Roadway Appendices. Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee: Represents Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee less Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues. This is the maximum cost that can be recovered through Impact fees. Service Area C 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Roadway Appendices SUMMARY OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs 51,696,805$ Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study Financing Cost 25,105,399 See Detail Below Existing Fund Balance (1,685,562) Roadway Appendices - page 1 Interest Earnings (12,702,369) Roadway Appendices - page 4 Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee 62,414,273$ Sum of Above Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues (1,157,132) Roadway Appendices - page 7 Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee 61,257,141$ Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs: Represents the portion of capital improvement costs that are eligible for funding through Impact fees. Reference is the Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study. Financing Costs: Represents the interest costs associated with debt financing the new Impact fee project costs. Interest costs are derived from existing debt issues and forecasted debt issues. New Annual Debt Service 66,432,715$ Roadway Appendices - page 2 Existing Annual Debt Service - Roadway Appendices - page 3 Principal Component (New and Existing Debt) (41,327,316) Roadway Appendices - page 1 Financing Costs 25,105,399$ Existing Fund Balance: Represents impact fee revenue collected but not yet expended. To avoid charging twice for the same project, the impact fee revenues collected but yet to be expended (i.e. fund balance) are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is page 1 of Roadway Appendices. Interest Earnings: Represents the interest earned on cash flows and assumes a 2.00% annual interest rate. The Impact Fee Statute states that interest earnings are funds of the Impact fee account and are held to the same restrictions as Impact fee revenues. Therefore in order to recognize that interest earnings are used to fund capital improvements, interest earnings are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is the sum of Accumulated Interest on page 4 of Roadway Appendices. Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee: Represents Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs plus Financing Costs less Existing Fund Balance and Interest Earnings. Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues: In 2001, the LGC Chapter 395 was amended to include a credit for ad valorem and utility revenues generated by new service units during the ten-year timeframe that are used to fund Impact fee eligible projects for which the new service units were charged an Impact fee. The intent of this amendment is to avoid double-charging the new service units for Impact fee capital improvements. The credit recognizes ad valorem revenues used to fund the debt service of debt financed Impact fee eligible projects and assumes that all non-debt funded impact fee eligible project costs will be funded solely through impact fee revenues or non-ad valorem revenue sources. Reference is page 7 of Roadway Appendices. Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee: Represents Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee less Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues. This is the maximum cost that can be recovered through Impact fees. Service Area D 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Roadway Appendices SUMMARY OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEE DETERMINATION Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs 79,169,421$ Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study Financing Cost 38,714,769 See Detail Below Existing Fund Balance (4,840,794) Roadway Appendices - page 1 Interest Earnings (19,534,195) Roadway Appendices - page 4 Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee 93,509,200$ Sum of Above Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues (3,628,065) Roadway Appendices - page 7 Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee 89,881,135$ Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs: Represents the portion of capital improvement costs that are eligible for funding through Impact fees. Reference is the Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study. Financing Costs: Represents the interest costs associated with debt financing the new Impact fee project costs. Interest costs are derived from existing debt issues and forecasted debt issues. New Annual Debt Service 102,210,271$ Roadway Appendices - page 2 Existing Annual Debt Service 388,356 Roadway Appendices - page 3 Principal Component (New and Existing Debt) (63,883,858) Roadway Appendices - page 1 Financing Costs 38,714,769$ Existing Fund Balance: Represents impact fee revenue collected but not yet expended. To avoid charging twice for the same project, the impact fee revenues collected but yet to be expended (i.e. fund balance) are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is page 1 of Roadway Appendices. Interest Earnings: Represents the interest earned on cash flows and assumes a 2.00% annual interest rate. The Impact Fee Statute states that interest earnings are funds of the Impact fee account and are held to the same restrictions as Impact fee revenues. Therefore in order to recognize that interest earnings are used to fund capital improvements, interest earnings are credited against the recoverable costs. Reference is the sum of Accumulated Interest on page 4 of Roadway Appendices. Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee: Represents Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs plus Financing Costs less Existing Fund Balance and Interest Earnings. Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues: In 2001, the LGC Chapter 395 was amended to include a credit for ad valorem and utility revenues generated by new service units during the ten-year timeframe that are used to fund Impact fee eligible projects for which the new service units were charged an Impact fee. The intent of this amendment is to avoid double-charging the new service units for Impact fee capital improvements. The credit recognizes ad valorem revenues used to fund the debt service of debt financed Impact fee eligible projects and assumes that all non-debt funded impact fee eligible project costs will be funded solely through impact fee revenues or non-ad valorem revenue sources. Reference is page 7 of Roadway Appendices. Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee: Represents Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee less Credit for Ad Valorem Revenues. This is the maximum cost that can be recovered through Impact fees. Service Area E 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Roadway Appendices 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas Appendix E – Plan for Awarding the Transportation Impact Fee Credit Supporting Exhibits (as prepared by NewGen Strategies.) I. General Assumptions Annual Interest Rate on Deposits (1)2.00% Annual Vehicle Mile Growth (2)3,997 Existing Fund Balance (3)4,394,807 Portion of Projects Funded by Existing Debt (3)-$ Non-debt Funded Project Cost (4)17,771,661 New Project Cost Funded Through New Debt (5)70,936,006 Total Recoverable Project Cost (6)88,707,667$ II. New Debt Issues Assumptions Year Principal (7)Interest (8)Term 1 7,093,601$ 4.05% 20 2 7,093,601 4.30% 20 3 7,093,601 5.00% 20 4 7,093,601 5.00% 20 5 7,093,601 5.15% 20 6 7,093,601 5.15% 20 7 7,093,601 5.25% 20 8 7,093,601 5.25% 20 9 7,093,601 5.50% 20 10 7,093,601 5.50% 20 Total 70,936,006$ III. Capital Expenditure Assumptions Annual Capital Year Expenditures (9) 1 1,777,166$ 2 4,141,700 3 6,506,233 4 8,870,767 5 8,870,767 6 8,870,767 7 8,870,767 8 8,870,767 9 8,870,767 10 8,870,767 11 7,093,601 12 4,729,067 13 2,364,534 Total 88,707,667 (1) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (2) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (3) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (4) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (5) This assumes 20% of new project costs funded through sources other than debt, unless specified otherwise (6) This assumes 80% of new project costs funded through new debt issues, unless specified otherwise (7) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (8) Assumes new debt issued in equal amounts every year (9) Estimated interest on future debt from City's Financial Advisor October 2022 (10) Assumes new debt proceeds expended over a 3-year timeframe Non-debt funded capital expenditures allocated per discussions with City Staff City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area A 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 1 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix E - Impact Fee Calculation AssumptionsDebt Service and Expense SummaryI. New Debt Service DetailTotalAnnualSeries Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series New DebtYear12345678910Service1524,273$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 524,273$ 2524,273 535,919 - - - - - - - - 1,060,192 3524,273 535,919 569,209 - - - - - - - 1,629,401 4524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 - - - - - - 2,198,610 5524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 - - - - - 2,775,081 6524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 - - - - 3,351,551 7524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 - - - 3,932,888 8524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 - - 4,514,225 9524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 - 5,107,813 10524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,701,400 11524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,701,400 12524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,701,400 13524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,701,400 14524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,701,400 15524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,701,400 16524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,701,400 17524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,701,400 18524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,701,400 19524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,701,400 20524,273 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,701,400 21- 535,919 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 5,177,127 22- - 569,209 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 4,641,208 23- - - 569,209 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 4,071,999 24- - - - 576,471 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 3,502,790 25- - - - - 576,471 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 2,926,320 26- - - - - - 581,337 581,337 593,588 593,588 2,349,849 27- - - - - - - 581,337 593,588 593,588 1,768,512 28- - - - - - - - 593,588 593,588 1,187,175 29- - - - - - - - - 593,588 593,588 10,485,462$ 10,718,380$ 11,384,177$ 11,384,177$ 11,529,415$ 11,529,415$ 11,626,735$ 11,626,735$ 11,871,755$ 11,871,755$ 114,028,007$ Service Area A2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasPage 2 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix E - Impact Fee Calculation AssumptionsDebt Service and Expense SummaryService Area AII. Summary of Annual ExpensesNew ExistingAnnual Annual Annual AnnualDebt Capital Bond Debt Annual TotalYearService(1)Expenditures(2)Proceeds(2)Service(3)Credit(4)Expense1524,273$ 1,777,166$ (7,093,601)$ -$ (3,449)$ (4,795,611)$ 21,060,192 4,141,700 (7,093,601) - (13,859) (1,905,568) 31,629,401 6,506,233 (7,093,601) - (31,743) 1,010,291 42,198,610 8,870,767 (7,093,601) - (56,740) 3,919,036 52,775,081 8,870,767 (7,093,601) - (88,948) 4,463,299 63,351,551 8,870,767 (7,093,601) - (128,089) 5,000,628 73,932,888 8,870,767 (7,093,601) - (174,248) 5,535,807 84,514,225 8,870,767 (7,093,601) - (227,138) 6,064,253 95,107,813 8,870,767 (7,093,601) - (287,324) 6,597,655 105,701,400 8,870,767 (7,093,601) - (354,136) 7,124,431 115,701,400 7,093,601 - - (354,136) 12,440,865 125,701,400 4,729,067 - - (354,136) 10,076,332 135,701,400 2,364,534 - - (354,136) 7,711,798 145,701,400 - - - (354,136) 5,347,265 155,701,400 - - - (354,136) 5,347,265 165,701,400 - - - (354,136) 5,347,265 175,701,400 - - - (354,136) 5,347,265 185,701,400 - - - (354,136) 5,347,265 195,701,400 - - - (354,136) 5,347,265 205,701,400 - - - (354,136) 5,347,265 215,177,127 - - - (321,571) 4,855,556 224,641,208 - - - (288,283) 4,352,925 234,071,999 - - - (252,927) 3,819,072 243,502,790 - - - (217,572) 3,285,219 252,926,320 - - - (181,765) 2,744,555 262,349,849 - - - (145,958) 2,203,891 271,768,512 - - - (109,849) 1,658,663 281,187,175 - - - (73,740) 1,113,436 29593,588 - - - (36,870) 556,718 PTD- - - - - - 114,028,007$ 88,707,667$ (70,936,006)$ -$ (6,535,564)$ 125,264,104$ (1) Appendix D - Service Area A, Page 2(2) Appendix D - Service Area A, Page 1(3) Eligible outstanding debt funded projects as a percent of total principal times original annual debt service, including Paid-To-Date (PTD) amounts(4) Appendix D - Service Area A, Page 72022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasPage 3 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Revenue Test Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Impact Estimated Impact Vehicle Fee Annual Accumulated Fund Year Fee Miles Revenue Expenses Sub-Total Interest Balance Initial 4,394,807$ 1 2,496$ 3,997 9,974,251$ (4,795,611)$ 14,769,861$ 235,595$ 19,400,263 2 2,496 3,997 9,974,251 (1,905,568) 11,879,819 506,803 31,786,885 3 2,496 3,997 9,974,251 1,010,291 8,963,960 725,377 41,476,222 4 2,496 3,997 9,974,251 3,919,036 6,055,215 890,077 48,421,514 5 2,496 3,997 9,974,251 4,463,299 5,510,952 1,023,540 54,956,005 6 2,496 3,997 9,974,251 5,000,628 4,973,622 1,148,856 61,078,484 7 2,496 3,997 9,974,251 5,535,807 4,438,444 1,265,954 66,782,882 8 2,496 3,997 9,974,251 6,064,253 3,909,998 1,374,758 72,067,637 9 2,496 3,997 9,974,251 6,597,655 3,376,596 1,475,119 76,919,351 10 2,496 3,997 9,974,251 7,124,431 2,849,820 1,566,885 81,336,056 11 - - - 12,440,865 (12,440,865) 1,502,312 70,397,503 12 - - - 10,076,332 (10,076,332) 1,307,187 61,628,358 13 - - - 7,711,798 (7,711,798) 1,155,449 55,072,009 14 - - - 5,347,265 (5,347,265) 1,047,968 50,772,712 15 - - - 5,347,265 (5,347,265) 961,982 46,387,429 16 - - - 5,347,265 (5,347,265) 874,276 41,914,440 17 - - - 5,347,265 (5,347,265) 784,816 37,351,992 18 - - - 5,347,265 (5,347,265) 693,567 32,698,294 19 - - - 5,347,265 (5,347,265) 600,493 27,951,523 20 - - - 5,347,265 (5,347,265) 505,558 23,109,816 21 - - - 4,855,556 (4,855,556) 413,641 18,667,900 22 - - - 4,352,925 (4,352,925) 329,829 14,644,804 23 - - - 3,819,072 (3,819,072) 254,705 11,080,437 24 - - - 3,285,219 (3,285,219) 188,757 7,983,975 25 - - - 2,744,555 (2,744,555) 132,234 5,371,654 26 - - - 2,203,891 (2,203,891) 85,394 3,253,157 27 - - - 1,658,663 (1,658,663) 48,477 1,642,970 28 - - - 1,113,436 (1,113,436) 21,725 551,260 29 - - - 556,718 (556,718) 5,458 - PTD - - - - - - - 99,742,506$ 125,264,104$ 21,126,791$ Service Area A 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton Texas Page 4 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Calculation Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Future Value Escalation Number of Interest Recovery Years to Rate Fee Annual Vehicle Miles Annual Expense Year End of Period Factor Factor Actual Escalated Actual Escalated 1 29 1.7584 1.0000 3,997 7,028 (4,795,611)$ (8,432,767)$ 2 28 1.7240 1.0000 3,997 6,890 (1,905,568) (3,285,114) 3 27 1.6902 1.0000 3,997 6,755 1,010,291 1,707,546 4 26 1.6570 1.0000 3,997 6,623 3,919,036 6,493,890 5 25 1.6245 1.0000 3,997 6,493 4,463,299 7,250,726 6 24 1.5927 1.0000 3,997 6,366 5,000,628 7,964,342 7 23 1.5614 1.0000 3,997 6,241 5,535,807 8,643,827 8 22 1.5308 1.0000 3,997 6,118 6,064,253 9,283,298 9 21 1.5008 1.0000 3,997 5,998 6,597,655 9,901,806 10 20 1.4714 1.0000 3,997 5,881 7,124,431 10,482,740 11 19 1.4425 1.0000 - - 12,440,865 17,946,305 12 18 1.4142 1.0000 - - 10,076,332 14,250,390 13 17 1.3865 1.0000 - - 7,711,798 10,692,513 14 16 1.3593 1.0000 - - 5,347,265 7,268,681 15 15 1.3327 1.0000 - - 5,347,265 7,126,158 16 14 1.3065 1.0000 - - 5,347,265 6,986,430 17 13 1.2809 1.0000 - - 5,347,265 6,849,441 18 12 1.2558 1.0000 - - 5,347,265 6,715,138 19 11 1.2312 1.0000 - - 5,347,265 6,583,469 20 10 1.2070 1.0000 - - 5,347,265 6,454,381 21 9 1.1834 1.0000 - - 4,855,556 5,745,949 22 8 1.1602 1.0000 - - 4,352,925 5,050,144 23 7 1.1374 1.0000 - - 3,819,072 4,343,904 24 6 1.1151 1.0000 - - 3,285,219 3,663,419 25 5 1.0933 1.0000 - - 2,744,555 3,000,502 26 4 1.0718 1.0000 - - 2,203,891 2,362,175 27 3 1.0508 1.0000 - - 1,658,663 1,742,930 28 2 1.0302 1.0000 - - 1,113,436 1,147,061 29 1 1.0100 1.0000 - - 556,718 562,285 PTD 1.0000 1.0000 - - - - 64,394 168,501,568$ Annual Interest Rate: 2.00% Total Escalated Expense for Entire Period 168,501,568$ Less Future Value of Initial Impact Fee Fund Balance 7,804,495 Sub-Total 160,697,073$ Total Escalated Vehicle Miles 64,394 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee for Roadway Service Area A 2,496$ Service Area A 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 5 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Project Funding Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area A Cost In Impact Fee Debt Funded (2)Non-Debt Impact Fee Street Name Service Area (1)Recoverable Cost(1)Existing Proposed Funded(2)Recoverable Cost CORBIN $ 10,164,000 $ 3,360,317 $ - $ 2,688,253 $ 672,063 $ 3,360,317 CORBIN 3,378,000 1,116,799 - 893,440 223,360 1,116,799 FM 1515 23,533,000 7,780,237 - 6,224,190 1,556,047 7,780,237 FM 1515 3,959,000 1,308,884 - 1,047,107 261,777 1,308,884 FM 1515 7,495,000 2,477,919 - 1,982,336 495,584 2,477,919 FM 1515 2,089,000 690,644 - 552,515 138,129 690,644 FM 1515 13,827,000 4,571,340 - 3,657,072 914,268 4,571,340 FM 1515 13,132,000 4,341,566 - 3,473,253 868,313 4,341,566 H LIVELY 3,613,000 1,194,493 - 955,594 238,899 1,194,493 H LIVELY 13,188,000 4,360,080 - 3,488,064 872,016 4,360,080 IH-35-CORBIN 7,040,000 2,327,492 - 1,861,994 465,498 2,327,492 JIM CHRISTAL 10,332,000 3,415,859 - 2,732,687 683,172 3,415,859 JIM CHRISTAL 4,873,000 1,611,061 - 1,288,849 322,212 1,611,061 JIM CHRISTAL 5,982,000 1,977,707 - 1,582,166 395,541 1,977,707 JIM CHRISTAL 9,251,000 3,058,470 - 2,446,776 611,694 3,058,470 JIM CHRISTAL 6,353,500 2,100,528 - 1,680,423 420,106 2,100,528 PRECISION-WESTERN 6,566,000 2,170,783 - 1,736,626 434,157 2,170,783 ROBSON RANCH 15,487,000 5,120,152 - 4,096,121 1,024,030 5,120,152 ROBSON RANCH 12,667,500 4,187,998 - 3,350,398 837,600 4,187,998 SPRINGSIDE 6,141,000 2,030,274 - 1,624,219 406,055 2,030,274 SPRINGSIDE 2,971,000 982,241 - 785,793 196,448 982,241 TJ EGAN-LOOP 288 3,722,000 1,230,529 - 984,423 246,106 1,230,529 C WOLFE 13,120,000 4,337,599 - 3,470,079 867,520 4,337,599 C WOLFE 6,009,000 1,986,633 - 1,589,307 397,327 1,986,633 CORBIN 3,667,000 1,212,346 - 969,877 242,469 1,212,346 J CHRISTAL-H LIVELY 5,353,000 1,769,754 - 1,415,803 353,951 1,769,754 PRECISION 3,694,000 1,221,272 - 977,018 244,254 1,221,272 THOMAS J EGAN 6,984,000 2,308,978 - 1,847,182 461,796 2,308,978 THOMAS J EGAN 2,317,500 766,188 - 612,950 153,238 766,188 UNDERWOOD 15,229,000 5,034,855 - 4,027,884 1,006,971 5,034,855 WESTCOURT 5,343,000 1,766,447 - 1,413,158 353,289 1,766,447 WESTERN 6,619,000 2,188,305 - 1,750,644 437,661 2,188,305 WESTERN 14,102,000 4,662,257 - 3,729,806 932,451 4,662,257 37,660 37,660 - - 37,660 37,660 $ 268,239,160 $ 88,707,667 $ - $ 70,936,006 $ 17,771,661 $ 88,707,667 (1) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (2) Per discussions with City staff and City files 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 6 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Credit Determination Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area A Eligible Debt Annual Vehicle Eligible Debt Service per Annual Growth in Vehicle Miles Credit for Annual Ad Valorem Year Service(1)Miles Vehicle Mile (Cumulative)Rate Revenues 1 524,273$ 607,498 0.86$ 3,997 3,449$ 2 1,060,192 611,495 1.73 7,994 13,859 3 1,629,401 615,491 2.65 11,990 31,743 4 2,198,610 619,488 3.55 15,987 56,740 5 2,775,081 623,485 4.45 19,984 88,948 6 3,351,551 627,482 5.34 23,981 128,089 7 3,932,888 631,479 6.23 27,978 174,248 8 4,514,225 635,476 7.10 31,975 227,138 9 5,107,813 639,472 7.99 35,971 287,324 10 5,701,400 643,469 8.86 39,968 354,136 11 5,701,400 643,469 8.86 39,968 354,136 12 5,701,400 643,469 8.86 39,968 354,136 13 5,701,400 643,469 8.86 39,968 354,136 14 5,701,400 643,469 8.86 39,968 354,136 15 5,701,400 643,469 8.86 39,968 354,136 16 5,701,400 643,469 8.86 39,968 354,136 17 5,701,400 643,469 8.86 39,968 354,136 18 5,701,400 643,469 8.86 39,968 354,136 19 5,701,400 643,469 8.86 39,968 354,136 20 5,701,400 643,469 8.86 39,968 354,136 21 5,177,127 643,469 8.05 39,968 321,571 22 4,641,208 643,469 7.21 39,968 288,283 23 4,071,999 643,469 6.33 39,968 252,927 24 3,502,790 643,469 5.44 39,968 217,572 25 2,926,320 643,469 4.55 39,968 181,765 26 2,349,849 643,469 3.65 39,968 145,958 27 1,768,512 643,469 2.75 39,968 109,849 28 1,187,175 643,469 1.84 39,968 73,740 29 593,588 643,469 0.92 39,968 36,870 Total 114,028,007$ 6,535,564$ 2022 Vehicle Miles (All Service Areas) (2)603,501 Ten Year Growth in Vehicle Miles (Service Area A) (2)39,968 10 years Annual Growth in Vehicle Miles 3,997 Credit Amount 6,535,564$ (1) Appendix D - Service Area A, Page 3 (2) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas 7 of 7 Roadway Appendices I. General Assumptions Annual Interest Rate on Deposits (1)2.00% Annual Vehicle Mile Growth (2)1,637 Existing Fund Balance (3)2,004,188 Portion of Projects Funded by Existing Debt (3)926,052$ Non-debt Funded Project Cost (4)11,635,178 New Project Cost Funded Through New Debt (5)40,230,457 Total Recoverable Project Cost (6)52,791,687$ II. New Debt Issues Assumptions Year Principal (7)Interest (8)Term 1 4,023,046$ 4.05% 20 2 4,023,046 4.30% 20 3 4,023,046 5.00% 20 4 4,023,046 5.00% 20 5 4,023,046 5.15% 20 6 4,023,046 5.15% 20 7 4,023,046 5.25% 20 8 4,023,046 5.25% 20 9 4,023,046 5.50% 20 10 4,023,046 5.50% 20 Total 40,230,457$ III. Capital Expenditure Assumptions Annual Capital Year Expenditures (9) 1 1,163,518$ 2 2,504,533 3 3,845,548 4 5,186,563 5 5,186,563 6 5,186,563 7 5,186,563 8 5,186,563 9 5,186,563 10 5,186,563 11 4,023,046 12 2,682,030 13 1,341,015 Total 51,865,635 (1) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (2) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (3) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (4) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (5) This assumes 20% of new project costs funded through sources other than debt, unless specified otherwise (6) This assumes 80% of new project costs funded through new debt issues, unless specified otherwise (7) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (8) Assumes new debt issued in equal amounts every year (9) Estimated interest on future debt from City's Financial Advisor October 2022 (10) Assumes new debt proceeds expended over a 3-year timeframe Non-debt funded capital expenditures allocated per discussions with City Staff City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area B 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 1 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix E - Impact Fee Calculation AssumptionsDebt Service and Expense SummaryI. New Debt Service DetailTotalAnnualSeries Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series New DebtYear12345678910Service1297,335$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 297,335$ 2297,335 303,940 - - - - - - - - 601,275 3297,335 303,940 322,820 - - - - - - - 924,094 4297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 - - - - - - 1,246,914 5297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 - - - - - 1,573,852 6297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 - - - - 1,900,790 7297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 - - - 2,230,488 8297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 - - 2,560,185 9297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 - 2,896,831 10297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 3,233,477 11297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 3,233,477 12297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 3,233,477 13297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 3,233,477 14297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 3,233,477 15297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 3,233,477 16297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 3,233,477 17297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 3,233,477 18297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 3,233,477 19297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 3,233,477 20297,335 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 3,233,477 21- 303,940 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 2,936,142 22- - 322,820 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 2,632,202 23- - - 322,820 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 2,309,383 24- - - - 326,938 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 1,986,563 25- - - - - 326,938 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 1,659,625 26- - - - - - 329,698 329,698 336,646 336,646 1,332,687 27- - - - - - - 329,698 336,646 336,646 1,002,989 28- - - - - - - - 336,646 336,646 673,292 29- - - - - - - - - 336,646 336,646 5,946,697$ 6,078,794$ 6,456,392$ 6,456,392$ 6,538,762$ 6,538,762$ 6,593,956$ 6,593,956$ 6,732,915$ 6,732,915$ 64,669,539$ Service Area B2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasPage 2 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix E - Impact Fee Calculation AssumptionsDebt Service and Expense SummaryService Area BII. Summary of Annual ExpensesNew ExistingAnnual Annual Annual AnnualDebt Capital Bond Debt Annual TotalYearService(1)Expenditures(2)Proceeds(2)Service(3)Credit(4)Expense1297,335$ 1,163,518$ (4,023,046)$ 33,574$ (895)$ (2,529,515)$ 2601,275 2,504,533 (4,023,046) 30,403 (3,409) (890,244) 3924,094 3,845,548 (4,023,046) 30,332 (7,706) 769,223 41,246,914 5,186,563 (4,023,046) 30,245 (13,712) 2,426,964 51,573,852 5,186,563 (4,023,046) 30,697 (21,476) 2,746,591 61,900,790 5,186,563 (4,023,046) 30,559 (30,937) 3,063,929 72,230,488 5,186,563 (4,023,046) 30,960 (42,149) 3,382,816 82,560,185 5,186,563 (4,023,046) 30,755 (55,043) 3,699,416 92,896,831 5,186,563 (4,023,046) 31,057 (69,790) 4,021,615 103,233,477 5,186,563 (4,023,046) 31,288 (86,239) 4,342,044 113,233,477 4,023,046 - 30,909 (86,229) 7,201,203 123,233,477 2,682,030 - 31,604 (86,247) 5,860,864 133,233,477 1,341,015 - 31,666 (86,249) 4,519,910 143,233,477 - - - (85,412) 3,148,065 153,233,477 - - - (85,412) 3,148,065 163,233,477 - - - (85,412) 3,148,065 173,233,477 - - - (85,412) 3,148,065 183,233,477 - - - (85,412) 3,148,065 193,233,477 - - - (85,412) 3,148,065 203,233,477 - - - (85,412) 3,148,065 212,936,142 - - - (77,558) 2,858,584 222,632,202 - - - (69,530) 2,562,673 232,309,383 - - - (61,002) 2,248,381 241,986,563 - - - (52,475) 1,934,088 251,659,625 - - - (43,839) 1,615,786 261,332,687 - - - (35,203) 1,297,484 271,002,989 - - - (26,494) 976,495 28673,292 - - - (17,785) 655,507 29336,646 - - - (8,892) 327,753 PTD- - - 766,716 - 766,716 64,669,539$ 51,865,635$ (40,230,457)$ 1,170,764$ (1,580,744)$ 75,894,737$ (1) Appendix D - Service Area B, Page 2(2) Appendix D - Service Area B, Page 1(3) Eligible outstanding debt funded projects as a percent of total principal times original annual debt service, including Paid-To-Date (PTD) amounts(4) Appendix D - Service Area B, Page 72022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasPage 3 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Revenue Test Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Impact Estimated Impact Vehicle Fee Annual Accumulated Fund Year Fee Miles Revenue Expenses Sub-Total Interest Balance Initial 2,004,188$ 1 3,742$ 1,637 6,126,809$ (2,529,515)$ 8,656,323$ 126,647$ 10,787,158 2 3,742 1,637 6,126,809 (890,244) 7,017,053 285,914 18,090,125 3 3,742 1,637 6,126,809 769,223 5,357,585 415,378 23,863,089 4 3,742 1,637 6,126,809 2,426,964 3,699,844 514,260 28,077,193 5 3,742 1,637 6,126,809 2,746,591 3,380,217 595,346 32,052,757 6 3,742 1,637 6,126,809 3,063,929 3,062,879 671,684 35,787,320 7 3,742 1,637 6,126,809 3,382,816 2,743,992 743,186 39,274,498 8 3,742 1,637 6,126,809 3,699,416 2,427,393 809,764 42,511,655 9 3,742 1,637 6,126,809 4,021,615 2,105,194 871,285 45,488,134 10 3,742 1,637 6,126,809 4,342,044 1,784,764 927,610 48,200,509 11 - - - 7,201,203 (7,201,203) 891,998 41,891,304 12 - - - 5,860,864 (5,860,864) 779,217 36,809,657 13 - - - 4,519,910 (4,519,910) 690,994 32,980,741 14 - - - 3,148,065 (3,148,065) 628,134 30,460,811 15 - - - 3,148,065 (3,148,065) 577,736 27,890,482 16 - - - 3,148,065 (3,148,065) 526,329 25,268,746 17 - - - 3,148,065 (3,148,065) 473,894 22,594,575 18 - - - 3,148,065 (3,148,065) 420,411 19,866,922 19 - - - 3,148,065 (3,148,065) 365,858 17,084,715 20 - - - 3,148,065 (3,148,065) 310,214 14,246,864 21 - - - 2,858,584 (2,858,584) 256,351 11,644,631 22 - - - 2,562,673 (2,562,673) 207,266 9,289,224 23 - - - 2,248,381 (2,248,381) 163,301 7,204,144 24 - - - 1,934,088 (1,934,088) 124,742 5,394,798 25 - - - 1,615,786 (1,615,786) 91,738 3,870,750 26 - - - 1,297,484 (1,297,484) 64,440 2,637,706 27 - - - 976,495 (976,495) 42,989 1,704,200 28 - - - 655,507 (655,507) 27,529 1,076,222 29 - - - 327,753 (327,753) 18,247 766,716 PTD - - - 766,716 (766,716) - - 61,268,086$ 75,894,737$ 12,622,463$ Service Area B 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton Texas Page 4 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Calculation Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Future Value Escalation Number of Interest Recovery Years to Rate Fee Annual Vehicle Miles Annual Expense Year End of Period Factor Factor Actual Escalated Actual Escalated 1 29 1.7584 1.0000 1,637 2,879 (2,529,515)$ (4,447,986)$ 2 28 1.7240 1.0000 1,637 2,823 (890,244) (1,534,742) 3 27 1.6902 1.0000 1,637 2,767 769,223 1,300,104 4 26 1.6570 1.0000 1,637 2,713 2,426,964 4,021,509 5 25 1.6245 1.0000 1,637 2,660 2,746,591 4,461,897 6 24 1.5927 1.0000 1,637 2,608 3,063,929 4,879,823 7 23 1.5614 1.0000 1,637 2,557 3,382,816 5,282,063 8 22 1.5308 1.0000 1,637 2,507 3,699,416 5,663,150 9 21 1.5008 1.0000 1,637 2,457 4,021,615 6,035,668 10 20 1.4714 1.0000 1,637 2,409 4,342,044 6,388,794 11 19 1.4425 1.0000 - - 7,201,203 10,387,942 12 18 1.4142 1.0000 - - 5,860,864 8,288,691 13 17 1.3865 1.0000 - - 4,519,910 6,266,916 14 16 1.3593 1.0000 - - 3,148,065 4,279,249 15 15 1.3327 1.0000 - - 3,148,065 4,195,343 16 14 1.3065 1.0000 - - 3,148,065 4,113,081 17 13 1.2809 1.0000 - - 3,148,065 4,032,432 18 12 1.2558 1.0000 - - 3,148,065 3,953,365 19 11 1.2312 1.0000 - - 3,148,065 3,875,848 20 10 1.2070 1.0000 - - 3,148,065 3,799,851 21 9 1.1834 1.0000 - - 2,858,584 3,382,780 22 8 1.1602 1.0000 - - 2,562,673 2,973,143 23 7 1.1374 1.0000 - - 2,248,381 2,557,362 24 6 1.1151 1.0000 - - 1,934,088 2,156,744 25 5 1.0933 1.0000 - - 1,615,786 1,766,469 26 4 1.0718 1.0000 - - 1,297,484 1,390,670 27 3 1.0508 1.0000 - - 976,495 1,026,105 28 2 1.0302 1.0000 - - 655,507 675,303 29 1 1.0100 1.0000 - - 327,753 331,031 PTD 1.0000 1.0000 - - 766,716 766,716 26,380 102,269,320$ Annual Interest Rate: 2.00% Total Escalated Expense for Entire Period 102,269,320$ Less Future Value of Initial Impact Fee Fund Balance 3,559,127 Sub-Total 98,710,193$ Total Escalated Vehicle Miles 26,380 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee for Roadway Service Area B 3,742$ Service Area B 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 5 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Project Funding Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area B Cost In Impact Fee Debt Funded (2)Non-Debt Impact Fee Street Name Service Area (1)Recoverable Cost(1)Existing Proposed Funded(2)Recoverable Cost ALLRED $ 3,048,500 $ 554,141 $ - $ 443,313 $ 110,828 $ 554,141 ALLRED 2,712,000 492,974 - 394,379 98,595 492,974 BRUSH CREEK 2,747,000 499,336 - 399,469 99,867 499,336 BRUSH CREEK 6,769,000 1,230,435 - 984,348 246,087 1,230,435 BRUSH CREEK 7,344,000 1,334,956 - 1,067,965 266,991 1,334,956 BRUSH CREEK 10,698,000 1,944,629 - 1,555,704 388,926 1,944,629 CORBIN 10,760,000 1,955,900 - 1,564,720 391,180 1,955,900 CREEKDALE 5,346,000 971,769 - 777,416 194,354 971,769 CREEKDALE 3,461,000 629,123 - 503,299 125,825 629,123 EL PASEO 3,369,000 612,400 - 489,920 122,480 612,400 FM 1515 2,595,000 471,706 - 377,365 94,341 471,706 HICKORY CREEK 1,605,000 291,749 88,729 168,830 34,190 291,749 HICKORY CREEK 1,789,000 325,196 98,957 188,120 38,119 325,196 HICKORY CREEK 8,638,000 1,570,173 591,089 751,270 227,814 1,570,173 HICKORY CREEK 2,003,000 364,095 147,277 160,056 56,763 364,095 HICKORY CREEK 7,612,000 1,383,672 - 1,349,481 34,190 1,383,672 HOBSON LANE 1,914,000 347,917 - 278,334 69,583 347,917 HOBSON LANE 5,710,000 1,037,936 - 830,348 207,587 1,037,936 HOBSON LANE 11,559,000 2,101,138 - 1,680,910 420,228 2,101,138 PARVIN 2,150,000 390,816 - 312,653 78,163 390,816 ROBINSON 8,061,000 1,465,289 - 1,172,231 293,058 1,465,289 RYAN 11,980,000 2,177,665 - 1,742,132 435,533 2,177,665 RYAN 10,878,000 1,977,349 - 1,581,879 395,470 1,977,349 RYAN 10,824,000 1,967,533 - 1,574,026 393,507 1,967,533 VINTAGE 11,721,000 2,130,585 - 969,951 1,160,634 2,130,585 VINTAGE 1,665,000 302,655 - 109,847 192,809 302,655 VINTAGE 7,975,000 1,449,656 - 583,906 865,750 1,449,656 WILLOWWOOD 2,079,000 377,910 - 302,328 75,582 377,910 BONNIE BRAE 1,285,000 233,581 - 186,865 46,716 233,581 BONNIE BRAE 11,351,000 2,063,329 - 1,650,663 412,666 2,063,329 BONNIE BRAE 2,260,500 410,902 - 328,722 82,180 410,902 COUNTRY CLUB 1,229,000 223,402 - 178,721 44,680 223,402 COUNTRY CLUB 15,093,000 2,743,531 - 2,194,825 548,706 2,743,531 COUNTRY CLUB 5,951,000 1,081,743 - 865,395 216,349 1,081,743 FORT WORTH 26,417,000 4,801,951 - 3,841,561 960,390 4,801,951 FORT WORTH 19,299,000 3,508,077 - 2,806,461 701,615 3,508,077 FORT WORTH 4,811,000 874,520 - 699,616 174,904 874,520 FORT WORTH 20,190,000 3,670,038 - 2,936,031 734,008 3,670,038 JOHN PAINE 238,000 43,262 - 34,610 8,652 43,262 JOHN PAINE 3,254,000 591,496 - 473,197 118,299 591,496 PARVIN-ROSELAWN 3,878,000 704,924 - 563,939 140,985 704,924 TEASLEY 1,039,000 188,864 - 151,091 37,773 188,864 TEASLEY 4,558,000 828,531 - 662,825 165,706 828,531 TEASLEY 1,493,000 271,390 - 217,112 54,278 271,390 TEASLEY 857,000 155,781 - 124,625 31,156 155,781 37,660 37,660 - - 37,660 37,660 $ 290,253,660 $ 52,791,687 $ 926,052 $ 40,230,457 $ 11,635,178 $ 52,791,687 (1) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (2) Per discussions with City staff and City files 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 6 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Credit Determination Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area B Eligible Debt Annual Vehicle Eligible Debt Service per Annual Growth in Vehicle Miles Credit for Annual Ad Valorem Year Service(1)Miles Vehicle Mile (Cumulative)Rate Revenues 1 330,909$ 605,138 0.55$ 1,637 895$ 2 631,678 606,776 1.04 3,275 3,409 3 954,426 608,413 1.57 4,912 7,706 4 1,277,158 610,051 2.09 6,550 13,712 5 1,604,549 611,688 2.62 8,187 21,476 6 1,931,348 613,325 3.15 9,824 30,937 7 2,261,448 614,963 3.68 11,462 42,149 8 2,590,940 616,600 4.20 13,099 55,043 9 2,927,888 618,238 4.74 14,737 69,790 10 3,264,765 619,875 5.27 16,374 86,239 11 3,264,386 619,875 5.27 16,374 86,229 12 3,265,081 619,875 5.27 16,374 86,247 13 3,265,143 619,875 5.27 16,374 86,249 14 3,233,477 619,875 5.22 16,374 85,412 15 3,233,477 619,875 5.22 16,374 85,412 16 3,233,477 619,875 5.22 16,374 85,412 17 3,233,477 619,875 5.22 16,374 85,412 18 3,233,477 619,875 5.22 16,374 85,412 19 3,233,477 619,875 5.22 16,374 85,412 20 3,233,477 619,875 5.22 16,374 85,412 21 2,936,142 619,875 4.74 16,374 77,558 22 2,632,202 619,875 4.25 16,374 69,530 23 2,309,383 619,875 3.73 16,374 61,002 24 1,986,563 619,875 3.20 16,374 52,475 25 1,659,625 619,875 2.68 16,374 43,839 26 1,332,687 619,875 2.15 16,374 35,203 27 1,002,989 619,875 1.62 16,374 26,494 28 673,292 619,875 1.09 16,374 17,785 29 336,646 619,875 0.54 16,374 8,892 Total 65,073,588$ 1,580,744$ 2022 Vehicle Miles (All Service Areas) (2)603,501 Ten Year Growth in Vehicle Miles (Service Area B) (2)16,374 10 years Annual Growth in Vehicle Miles 1,637 Credit Amount 1,580,744$ (1) Appendix D - Service Area B, Page 3 (2) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas 7 of 7 Roadway Appendices I. General Assumptions Annual Interest Rate on Deposits (1)2.00% Annual Vehicle Mile Growth (2)3,133 Existing Fund Balance (3)3,170,473 Portion of Projects Funded by Existing Debt (3)-$ Non-debt Funded Project Cost (4)25,312,100 New Project Cost Funded Through New Debt (5)101,097,761 Total Recoverable Project Cost (6)126,409,861$ II. New Debt Issues Assumptions Year Principal (7)Interest (8)Term 1 10,109,776$ 4.05% 20 2 10,109,776 4.30% 20 3 10,109,776 5.00% 20 4 10,109,776 5.00% 20 5 10,109,776 5.15% 20 6 10,109,776 5.15% 20 7 10,109,776 5.25% 20 8 10,109,776 5.25% 20 9 10,109,776 5.50% 20 10 10,109,776 5.50% 20 Total 101,097,761$ III. Capital Expenditure Assumptions Annual Capital Year Expenditures (9) 1 2,531,210$ 2 5,901,135 3 9,271,061 4 12,640,986 5 12,640,986 6 12,640,986 7 12,640,986 8 12,640,986 9 12,640,986 10 12,640,986 11 10,109,776 12 6,739,851 13 3,369,925 Total 126,409,861 (1) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (2) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (3) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (4) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (5) This assumes 20% of new project costs funded through sources other than debt, unless specified otherwise (6) This assumes 80% of new project costs funded through new debt issues, unless specified otherwise (7) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (8) Assumes new debt issued in equal amounts every year (9) Estimated interest on future debt from City's Financial Advisor October 2022 (10) Assumes new debt proceeds expended over a 3-year timeframe Non-debt funded capital expenditures allocated per discussions with City Staff City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area C 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 1 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix E - Impact Fee Calculation AssumptionsDebt Service and Expense SummaryI. New Debt Service DetailTotalAnnualSeries Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series New DebtYear12345678910Service1747,192$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 747,192$ 2747,192 763,790 - - - - - - - - 1,510,982 3747,192 763,790 811,235 - - - - - - - 2,322,217 4747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 - - - - - - 3,133,451 5747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 - - - - - 3,955,036 6747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 - - - - 4,776,620 7747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 - - - 5,605,139 8747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 - - 6,433,658 9747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 - 7,279,638 10747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 8,125,617 11747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 8,125,617 12747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 8,125,617 13747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 8,125,617 14747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 8,125,617 15747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 8,125,617 16747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 8,125,617 17747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 8,125,617 18747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 8,125,617 19747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 8,125,617 20747,192 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 8,125,617 21- 763,790 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 7,378,425 22- - 811,235 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 6,614,635 23- - - 811,235 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 5,803,400 24- - - - 821,584 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 4,992,165 25- - - - - 821,584 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 4,170,581 26- - - - - - 828,519 828,519 845,979 845,979 3,348,997 27- - - - - - - 828,519 845,979 845,979 2,520,478 28- - - - - - - - 845,979 845,979 1,691,959 29- - - - - - - - - 845,979 845,979 14,943,846$ 15,275,800$ 16,224,692$ 16,224,692$ 16,431,684$ 16,431,684$ 16,570,385$ 16,570,385$ 16,919,586$ 16,919,586$ 162,512,338$ Service Area C2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasPage 2 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix E - Impact Fee Calculation AssumptionsDebt Service and Expense SummaryService Area CII. Summary of Annual ExpensesNew ExistingAnnual Annual Annual AnnualDebt Capital Bond Debt Annual TotalYearService(1)Expenditures(2)Proceeds(2)Service(3)Credit(4)Expense1747,192$ 2,531,210$ (10,109,776)$ -$ (3,859)$ (6,835,233)$ 21,510,982 5,901,135 (10,109,776) - (15,528) (2,713,186) 32,322,217 9,271,061 (10,109,776) - (35,614) 1,447,888 43,133,451 12,640,986 (10,109,776) - (63,747) 5,600,914 53,955,036 12,640,986 (10,109,776) - (100,068) 6,386,177 64,776,620 12,640,986 (10,109,776) - (144,297) 7,163,533 75,605,139 12,640,986 (10,109,776) - (196,556) 7,939,793 86,433,658 12,640,986 (10,109,776) - (256,555) 8,708,313 97,279,638 12,640,986 (10,109,776) - (324,957) 9,485,891 108,125,617 12,640,986 (10,109,776) - (401,034) 10,255,793 118,125,617 10,109,776 - - (401,034) 17,834,359 128,125,617 6,739,851 - - (401,034) 14,464,434 138,125,617 3,369,925 - - (401,034) 11,094,509 148,125,617 - - - (401,034) 7,724,583 158,125,617 - - - (401,034) 7,724,583 168,125,617 - - - (401,034) 7,724,583 178,125,617 - - - (401,034) 7,724,583 188,125,617 - - - (401,034) 7,724,583 198,125,617 - - - (401,034) 7,724,583 208,125,617 - - - (401,034) 7,724,583 217,378,425 - - - (364,156) 7,014,268 226,614,635 - - - (326,460) 6,288,174 235,803,400 - - - (286,422) 5,516,978 244,992,165 - - - (246,384) 4,745,781 254,170,581 - - - (205,836) 3,964,745 263,348,997 - - - (165,287) 3,183,710 272,520,478 - - - (124,396) 2,396,082 281,691,959 - - - (83,505) 1,608,453 29845,979 - - - (41,753) 804,227 PTD- - - - - - 162,512,338$ 126,409,861$ ########### -$ (7,396,751)$ 180,427,687$ (1) Appendix D - Service Area C, Page 2(2) Appendix D - Service Area C, Page 1(3) Eligible outstanding debt funded projects as a percent of total principal times original annual debt service, including Paid-To-Date (PTD) amounts(4) Appendix D - Service Area C, Page 72022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasPage 3 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Revenue Test Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Impact Estimated Impact Vehicle Fee Annual Accumulated Fund Year Fee Miles Revenue Expenses Sub-Total Interest Balance Initial 3,170,473$ 1 4,695$ 3,133 14,711,436$ (6,835,233)$ 21,546,669$ 278,876$ 24,996,019 2 4,695 3,133 14,711,436 (2,713,186) 17,424,622 674,167 43,094,808 3 4,695 3,133 14,711,436 1,447,888 13,263,548 994,532 57,352,888 4 4,695 3,133 14,711,436 5,600,914 9,110,522 1,238,163 67,701,573 5 4,695 3,133 14,711,436 6,386,177 8,325,259 1,437,284 77,464,116 6 4,695 3,133 14,711,436 7,163,533 7,547,903 1,624,761 86,636,780 7 4,695 3,133 14,711,436 7,939,793 6,771,644 1,800,452 95,208,876 8 4,695 3,133 14,711,436 8,708,313 6,003,123 1,964,209 103,176,208 9 4,695 3,133 14,711,436 9,485,891 5,225,545 2,115,780 110,517,533 10 4,695 3,133 14,711,436 10,255,793 4,455,643 2,254,907 117,228,083 11 - - - 17,834,359 (17,834,359) 2,166,218 101,559,941 12 - - - 14,464,434 (14,464,434) 1,886,554 88,982,062 13 - - - 11,094,509 (11,094,509) 1,668,696 79,556,249 14 - - - 7,724,583 (7,724,583) 1,513,879 73,345,545 15 - - - 7,724,583 (7,724,583) 1,389,665 67,010,627 16 - - - 7,724,583 (7,724,583) 1,262,967 60,549,010 17 - - - 7,724,583 (7,724,583) 1,133,734 53,958,161 18 - - - 7,724,583 (7,724,583) 1,001,917 47,235,495 19 - - - 7,724,583 (7,724,583) 867,464 40,378,376 20 - - - 7,724,583 (7,724,583) 730,322 33,384,114 21 - - - 7,014,268 (7,014,268) 597,540 26,967,386 22 - - - 6,288,174 (6,288,174) 476,466 21,155,677 23 - - - 5,516,978 (5,516,978) 367,944 16,006,643 24 - - - 4,745,781 (4,745,781) 272,675 11,533,537 25 - - - 3,964,745 (3,964,745) 191,023 7,759,815 26 - - - 3,183,710 (3,183,710) 123,359 4,699,465 27 - - - 2,396,082 (2,396,082) 70,028 2,373,412 28 - - - 1,608,453 (1,608,453) 31,384 796,342 29 - - - 804,227 (804,227) 7,885 - PTD - - - - - - - 147,114,363$ 180,427,687$ 30,142,851$ Service Area C 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton Texas Page 4 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Calculation Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Future Value Escalation Number of Interest Recovery Years to Rate Fee Annual Vehicle Miles Annual Expense Year End of Period Factor Factor Actual Escalated Actual Escalated 1 29 1.7584 1.0000 3,133 5,509 (6,835,233)$ (12,019,309)$ 2 28 1.7240 1.0000 3,133 5,401 (2,713,186) (4,677,412) 3 27 1.6902 1.0000 3,133 5,296 1,447,888 2,447,151 4 26 1.6570 1.0000 3,133 5,192 5,600,914 9,280,782 5 25 1.6245 1.0000 3,133 5,090 6,386,177 10,374,483 6 24 1.5927 1.0000 3,133 4,990 7,163,533 11,409,132 7 23 1.5614 1.0000 3,133 4,892 7,939,793 12,397,506 8 22 1.5308 1.0000 3,133 4,796 8,708,313 13,330,886 9 21 1.5008 1.0000 3,133 4,702 9,485,891 14,236,490 10 20 1.4714 1.0000 3,133 4,610 10,255,793 15,090,162 11 19 1.4425 1.0000 - - 17,834,359 25,726,575 12 18 1.4142 1.0000 - - 14,464,434 20,456,237 13 17 1.3865 1.0000 - - 11,094,509 15,382,687 14 16 1.3593 1.0000 - - 7,724,583 10,500,235 15 15 1.3327 1.0000 - - 7,724,583 10,294,348 16 14 1.3065 1.0000 - - 7,724,583 10,092,498 17 13 1.2809 1.0000 - - 7,724,583 9,894,606 18 12 1.2558 1.0000 - - 7,724,583 9,700,594 19 11 1.2312 1.0000 - - 7,724,583 9,510,386 20 10 1.2070 1.0000 - - 7,724,583 9,323,908 21 9 1.1834 1.0000 - - 7,014,268 8,300,516 22 8 1.1602 1.0000 - - 6,288,174 7,295,367 23 7 1.1374 1.0000 - - 5,516,978 6,275,143 24 6 1.1151 1.0000 - - 4,745,781 5,292,123 25 5 1.0933 1.0000 - - 3,964,745 4,334,484 26 4 1.0718 1.0000 - - 3,183,710 3,412,364 27 3 1.0508 1.0000 - - 2,396,082 2,517,812 28 2 1.0302 1.0000 - - 1,608,453 1,657,029 29 1 1.0100 1.0000 - - 804,227 812,269 PTD 1.0000 1.0000 - - - - 50,479 242,649,053$ Annual Interest Rate: 2.00% Total Escalated Expense for Entire Period 242,649,053$ Less Future Value of Initial Impact Fee Fund Balance 5,630,268 Sub-Total 237,018,784$ Total Escalated Vehicle Miles 50,479 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee for Roadway Service Area C 4,695$ Service Area C 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 5 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Project Funding Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area C Cost In Impact Fee Debt Funded (2)Non-Debt Impact Fee Street Name Service Area (1)Recoverable Cost(1)Existing Proposed Funded(2)Recoverable Cost BARTHOLD $ 8,875,000 $ 1,908,981 $ - $ 1,527,185 $ 381,796 $ 1,908,981 BOBCAT 37,762,000 8,122,474 - 6,497,979 1,624,495 8,122,474 FM 1173 13,401,000 2,882,508 - 2,306,006 576,502 2,882,508 FM 1173 3,852,000 828,552 - 662,841 165,710 828,552 FM 2164-IH 35 37,057,000 7,970,831 - 6,376,665 1,594,166 7,970,831 GANZER 39,748,000 8,549,655 - 6,839,724 1,709,931 8,549,655 GANZER 11,525,000 2,478,987 - 1,983,190 495,797 2,478,987 GANZER 2,854,000 613,885 - 491,108 122,777 613,885 GANZER 4,604,000 990,304 - 792,243 198,061 990,304 JIM CHRISTAL 4,873,000 1,048,165 - 838,532 209,633 1,048,165 JIM CHRISTAL 5,982,000 1,286,707 - 1,029,366 257,341 1,286,707 JIM CHRISTAL 9,251,000 1,989,858 - 1,591,886 397,972 1,989,858 JIM CHRISTAL 6,353,500 1,366,616 - 1,093,292 273,323 1,366,616 JIM CHRISTAL 4,773,500 1,026,763 - 821,410 205,353 1,026,763 JIM CHRISTAL 2,920,500 628,189 - 502,551 125,638 628,189 MARSHALL 5,249,000 1,129,041 - 903,233 225,808 1,129,041 MARSHALL 4,397,000 945,779 - 756,623 189,156 945,779 MASCH BRANCH 10,602,000 2,280,453 - 1,824,362 456,091 2,280,453 WESTWARD 1,672,000 359,641 - 287,713 71,928 359,641 RINEY 3,156,000 678,845 - 543,076 135,769 678,845 RINEY 1,258,000 270,591 - 216,473 54,118 270,591 US 77 1,432,000 308,018 - 246,415 61,604 308,018 US 77 2,819,000 606,357 - 485,086 121,271 606,357 US 77 2,075,000 446,325 - 357,060 89,265 446,325 US 77 3,126,000 672,392 - 537,913 134,478 672,392 US 77 1,859,000 399,864 - 319,892 79,973 399,864 US 77 4,739,000 1,019,342 - 815,474 203,868 1,019,342 MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 2,094,000 450,412 - 360,330 90,082 450,412 MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 4,450,000 957,179 - 765,744 191,436 957,179 MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 4,379,000 941,908 - 753,526 188,382 941,908 MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 1,046,000 224,991 - 179,993 44,998 224,991 MASCH BRANCH-NAIL 4,376,000 941,262 - 753,010 188,252 941,262 WESTGATE 2,336,000 502,465 - 401,972 100,493 502,465 WINDSOR 6,912,000 1,486,747 - 1,189,398 297,349 1,486,747 WINDSOR 6,972,000 1,499,653 - 1,199,722 299,931 1,499,653 WINDSOR 649,000 139,598 - 111,678 27,920 139,598 WINDSOR 1,162,000 249,942 - 199,954 49,988 249,942 WINDSOR 17,606,000 3,786,989 - 3,029,591 757,398 3,786,989 BARTHOLD 7,425,000 1,597,091 - 1,277,673 319,418 1,597,091 BONNIE BRAE 52,065,000 11,198,999 - 8,959,199 2,239,800 11,198,999 BONNIE BRAE 3,008,000 647,010 - 517,608 129,402 647,010 BONNIE BRAE 6,587,000 1,416,841 - 1,133,472 283,368 1,416,841 BONNIE BRAE 10,320,000 2,219,796 - 1,775,837 443,959 2,219,796 BONNIE BRAE 11,981,000 2,577,071 - 2,061,657 515,414 2,577,071 BONNIE BRAE 4,155,000 893,726 - 714,981 178,745 893,726 BONNIE BRAE 1,528,000 328,667 - 262,934 65,733 328,667 BONNIE BRAE 1,685,000 362,438 - 289,950 72,488 362,438 BONNIE BRAE 543,500 116,905 - 93,524 23,381 116,905 BONNIE BRAE 2,035,000 437,721 - 350,177 87,544 437,721 BONNIE BRAE 1,228,500 264,246 - 211,397 52,849 264,246 C WOLFE 8,901,000 1,914,574 - 1,531,659 382,915 1,914,574 FALLMEADOW 1,303,000 280,271 - 224,217 56,054 280,271 FM 2164 24,962,500 5,369,346 - 4,295,477 1,073,869 5,369,346 LOCUST 3,477,000 747,891 - 598,312 149,578 747,891 LOCUST 3,716,500 799,406 - 639,525 159,881 799,406 LOCUST 1,814,000 390,185 - 312,148 78,037 390,185 LOCUST 1,920,500 413,093 - 330,474 82,619 413,093 LOVERS 12,266,000 2,638,374 - 2,110,699 527,675 2,638,374 LOVERS 3,349,000 720,358 - 576,287 144,072 720,358 LOVERS LN CONNECTOR 756,000 162,613 - 130,090 32,523 162,613 LOVERS LN CONNECTOR 972,000 209,074 - 167,259 41,815 209,074 MASCH BRANCH 5,954,000 1,280,685 - 1,024,548 256,137 1,280,685 MASCH BRANCH 11,352,000 2,441,775 - 1,953,420 488,355 2,441,775 MASCH BRANCH 12,137,000 2,610,626 - 2,088,501 522,125 2,610,626 MILAM-LOOP 288 36,182,000 7,782,621 - 6,226,097 1,556,524 7,782,621 MILAM-US 77 20,546,000 4,419,373 - 3,535,498 883,875 4,419,373 MILAM-US 77 11,567,000 2,488,021 - 1,990,417 497,604 2,488,021 MILAM-US 77 7,359,000 1,582,895 - 1,266,316 316,579 1,582,895 NICOSIA 1,169,000 251,448 - 201,158 50,290 251,448 THOMAS J EGAN 12,353,000 2,657,087 - 2,125,670 531,417 2,657,087 WESTERN 14,699,000 3,161,703 - 2,529,363 632,341 3,161,703 37,660 37,660 - - 37,660 37,660 $ 587,551,660 $ 126,409,861 $ - $ 101,097,761 $ 25,312,100 $ 126,409,861 (1) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (2) Per discussions with City staff and City files2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 6 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Credit Determination Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area C Eligible Debt Annual Vehicle Eligible Debt Service per Annual Growth in Vehicle Miles Credit for Annual Ad Valorem Year Service(1)Miles Vehicle Mile (Cumulative)Rate Revenues 1 747,192$ 606,634 1.23$ 3,133 3,859$ 2 1,510,982 609,767 2.48 6,266 15,528 3 2,322,217 612,901 3.79 9,400 35,614 4 3,133,451 616,034 5.09 12,533 63,747 5 3,955,036 619,167 6.39 15,666 100,068 6 4,776,620 622,300 7.68 18,799 144,297 7 5,605,139 625,433 8.96 21,932 196,556 8 6,433,658 628,566 10.24 25,065 256,555 9 7,279,638 631,700 11.52 28,199 324,957 10 8,125,617 634,833 12.80 31,332 401,034 11 8,125,617 634,833 12.80 31,332 401,034 12 8,125,617 634,833 12.80 31,332 401,034 13 8,125,617 634,833 12.80 31,332 401,034 14 8,125,617 634,833 12.80 31,332 401,034 15 8,125,617 634,833 12.80 31,332 401,034 16 8,125,617 634,833 12.80 31,332 401,034 17 8,125,617 634,833 12.80 31,332 401,034 18 8,125,617 634,833 12.80 31,332 401,034 19 8,125,617 634,833 12.80 31,332 401,034 20 8,125,617 634,833 12.80 31,332 401,034 21 7,378,425 634,833 11.62 31,332 364,156 22 6,614,635 634,833 10.42 31,332 326,460 23 5,803,400 634,833 9.14 31,332 286,422 24 4,992,165 634,833 7.86 31,332 246,384 25 4,170,581 634,833 6.57 31,332 205,836 26 3,348,997 634,833 5.28 31,332 165,287 27 2,520,478 634,833 3.97 31,332 124,396 28 1,691,959 634,833 2.67 31,332 83,505 29 845,979 634,833 1.33 31,332 41,753 Total 162,512,338$ 7,396,751$ 2022 Vehicle Miles (All Service Areas) (2)603,501 Ten Year Growth in Vehicle Miles (Service Area C) (2)31,332 10 years Annual Growth in Vehicle Miles 3,133 Credit Amount 7,396,751$ (1) Appendix D - Service Area C, Page 3 (2) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas 7 of 7 Roadway Appendices I. General Assumptions Annual Interest Rate on Deposits (1)2.00% Annual Vehicle Mile Growth (2)1,163 Existing Fund Balance (3)1,685,562 Portion of Projects Funded by Existing Debt (3)-$ Non-debt Funded Project Cost (4)10,369,489 New Project Cost Funded Through New Debt (5)41,327,316 Total Recoverable Project Cost (6)51,696,805$ II. New Debt Issues Assumptions Year Principal (7)Interest (8)Term 1 4,132,732$ 4.05% 20 2 4,132,732 4.30% 20 3 4,132,732 5.00% 20 4 4,132,732 5.00% 20 5 4,132,732 5.15% 20 6 4,132,732 5.15% 20 7 4,132,732 5.25% 20 8 4,132,732 5.25% 20 9 4,132,732 5.50% 20 10 4,132,732 5.50% 20 Total 41,327,316$ III. Capital Expenditure Assumptions Annual Capital Year Expenditures (9) 1 1,036,949$ 2 2,414,526 3 3,792,103 4 5,169,681 5 5,169,681 6 5,169,681 7 5,169,681 8 5,169,681 9 5,169,681 10 5,169,681 11 4,132,732 12 2,755,154 13 1,377,577 Total 51,696,805 (1) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (2) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (3) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (4) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (5) This assumes 20% of new project costs funded through sources other than debt, unless specified otherwise (6) This assumes 80% of new project costs funded through new debt issues, unless specified otherwise (7) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (8) Assumes new debt issued in equal amounts every year (9) Estimated interest on future debt from City's Financial Advisor October 2022 (10) Assumes new debt proceeds expended over a 3-year timeframe Non-debt funded capital expenditures allocated per discussions with City Staff City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area D 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 1 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix E - Impact Fee Calculation AssumptionsDebt Service and Expense SummaryI. New Debt Service DetailTotalAnnualSeries Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series New DebtYear12345678910Service1305,442$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 305,442$ 2305,442 312,226 - - - - - - - - 617,668 3305,442 312,226 331,621 - - - - - - - 949,289 4305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 - - - - - - 1,280,910 5305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 - - - - - 1,616,762 6305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 - - - - 1,952,614 7305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 - - - 2,291,301 8305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 - - 2,629,987 9305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 - 2,975,812 10305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,321,636 11305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,321,636 12305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,321,636 13305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,321,636 14305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,321,636 15305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,321,636 16305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,321,636 17305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,321,636 18305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,321,636 19305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,321,636 20305,442 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,321,636 21- 312,226 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 3,016,194 22- - 331,621 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 2,703,968 23- - - 331,621 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 2,372,347 24- - - - 335,852 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 2,040,726 25- - - - - 335,852 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 1,704,874 26- - - - - - 338,687 338,687 345,824 345,824 1,369,022 27- - - - - - - 338,687 345,824 345,824 1,030,335 28- - - - - - - - 345,824 345,824 691,648 29- - - - - - - - - 345,824 345,824 6,108,830$ 6,244,528$ 6,632,422$ 6,632,422$ 6,717,037$ 6,717,037$ 6,773,736$ 6,773,736$ 6,916,484$ 6,916,484$ 66,432,715$ Service Area D2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasPage 2 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix E - Impact Fee Calculation AssumptionsDebt Service and Expense SummaryService Area DII. Summary of Annual ExpensesNew ExistingAnnual Annual Annual AnnualDebt Capital Bond Debt Annual TotalYearService(1)Expenditures(2)Proceeds(2)Service(3)Credit(4)Expense1305,442$ 1,036,949$ (4,132,732)$ -$ (588)$ (2,790,929)$ 2617,668 2,414,526 (4,132,732) - (2,372) (1,102,910) 3949,289 3,792,103 (4,132,732) - (5,458) 603,202 41,280,910 5,169,681 (4,132,732) - (9,802) 2,308,057 51,616,762 5,169,681 (4,132,732) - (15,435) 2,638,276 61,952,614 5,169,681 (4,132,732) - (22,327) 2,967,236 72,291,301 5,169,681 (4,132,732) - (30,508) 3,297,741 82,629,987 5,169,681 (4,132,732) - (39,944) 3,626,992 92,975,812 5,169,681 (4,132,732) - (50,750) 3,962,011 103,321,636 5,169,681 (4,132,732) - (62,823) 4,295,762 113,321,636 4,132,732 - - (62,823) 7,391,545 123,321,636 2,755,154 - - (62,823) 6,013,967 133,321,636 1,377,577 - - (62,823) 4,636,390 143,321,636 - - - (62,823) 3,258,813 153,321,636 - - - (62,823) 3,258,813 163,321,636 - - - (62,823) 3,258,813 173,321,636 - - - (62,823) 3,258,813 183,321,636 - - - (62,823) 3,258,813 193,321,636 - - - (62,823) 3,258,813 203,321,636 - - - (62,823) 3,258,813 213,016,194 - - - (57,046) 2,959,148 222,703,968 - - - (51,141) 2,652,827 232,372,347 - - - (44,869) 2,327,478 242,040,726 - - - (38,597) 2,002,129 251,704,874 - - - (32,245) 1,672,629 261,369,022 - - - (25,893) 1,343,129 271,030,335 - - - (19,487) 1,010,848 28691,648 - - - (13,081) 678,567 29345,824 - - - (6,541) 339,284 PTD- - - - - - 66,432,715$ 51,696,805$ (41,327,316)$ -$ (1,157,132)$ 75,645,072$ (1) Appendix D - Service Area D, Page 2(2) Appendix D - Service Area D, Page 1(3) Eligible outstanding debt funded projects as a percent of total principal times original annual debt service, including Paid-To-Date (PTD) amounts(4) Appendix D - Service Area D, Page 72022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasPage 3 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Revenue Test Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Impact Estimated Impact Vehicle Fee Annual Accumulated Fund Year Fee Miles Revenue Expenses Sub-Total Interest Balance Initial 1,685,562$ 1 5,265$ 1,163 6,125,714$ (2,790,929)$ 8,916,643$ 122,878$ 10,725,083 2 5,265 1,163 6,125,714 (1,102,910) 7,228,624 286,788 18,240,495 3 5,265 1,163 6,125,714 603,202 5,522,512 420,035 24,183,041 4 5,265 1,163 6,125,714 2,308,057 3,817,657 521,837 28,522,536 5 5,265 1,163 6,125,714 2,638,276 3,487,438 605,325 32,615,299 6 5,265 1,163 6,125,714 2,967,236 3,158,478 683,891 36,457,668 7 5,265 1,163 6,125,714 3,297,741 2,827,973 757,433 40,043,074 8 5,265 1,163 6,125,714 3,626,992 2,498,722 825,849 43,367,645 9 5,265 1,163 6,125,714 3,962,011 2,163,703 888,990 46,420,338 10 5,265 1,163 6,125,714 4,295,762 1,829,952 946,706 49,196,997 11 - - - 7,391,545 (7,391,545) 910,024 42,715,476 12 - - - 6,013,967 (6,013,967) 794,170 37,495,679 13 - - - 4,636,390 (4,636,390) 703,550 33,562,838 14 - - - 3,258,813 (3,258,813) 638,669 30,942,694 15 - - - 3,258,813 (3,258,813) 586,266 28,270,147 16 - - - 3,258,813 (3,258,813) 532,815 25,544,148 17 - - - 3,258,813 (3,258,813) 478,295 22,763,630 18 - - - 3,258,813 (3,258,813) 422,684 19,927,502 19 - - - 3,258,813 (3,258,813) 365,962 17,034,650 20 - - - 3,258,813 (3,258,813) 308,105 14,083,942 21 - - - 2,959,148 (2,959,148) 252,087 11,376,881 22 - - - 2,652,827 (2,652,827) 201,009 8,925,063 23 - - - 2,327,478 (2,327,478) 155,226 6,752,812 24 - - - 2,002,129 (2,002,129) 115,035 4,865,718 25 - - - 1,672,629 (1,672,629) 80,588 3,273,677 26 - - - 1,343,129 (1,343,129) 52,042 1,982,589 27 - - - 1,010,848 (1,010,848) 29,543 1,001,284 28 - - - 678,567 (678,567) 13,240 335,957 29 - - - 339,284 (339,284) 3,326 - PTD - - - - - - - 61,257,141$ 75,645,072$ 12,702,369$ Service Area D 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton Texas Page 4 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Calculation Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Future Value Escalation Number of Interest Recovery Years to Rate Fee Annual Vehicle Miles Annual Expense Year End of Period Factor Factor Actual Escalated Actual Escalated 1 29 1.7584 1.0000 1,163 2,046 (2,790,929)$ (4,907,665)$ 2 28 1.7240 1.0000 1,163 2,006 (1,102,910) (1,901,367) 3 27 1.6902 1.0000 1,163 1,966 603,202 1,019,504 4 26 1.6570 1.0000 1,163 1,928 2,308,057 3,824,479 5 25 1.6245 1.0000 1,163 1,890 2,638,276 4,285,936 6 24 1.5927 1.0000 1,163 1,853 2,967,236 4,725,822 7 23 1.5614 1.0000 1,163 1,817 3,297,741 5,149,223 8 22 1.5308 1.0000 1,163 1,781 3,626,992 5,552,283 9 21 1.5008 1.0000 1,163 1,746 3,962,011 5,946,213 10 20 1.4714 1.0000 1,163 1,712 4,295,762 6,320,695 11 19 1.4425 1.0000 - - 7,391,545 10,662,515 12 18 1.4142 1.0000 - - 6,013,967 8,505,216 13 17 1.3865 1.0000 - - 4,636,390 6,428,418 14 16 1.3593 1.0000 - - 3,258,813 4,429,793 15 15 1.3327 1.0000 - - 3,258,813 4,342,934 16 14 1.3065 1.0000 - - 3,258,813 4,257,778 17 13 1.2809 1.0000 - - 3,258,813 4,174,293 18 12 1.2558 1.0000 - - 3,258,813 4,092,444 19 11 1.2312 1.0000 - - 3,258,813 4,012,200 20 10 1.2070 1.0000 - - 3,258,813 3,933,529 21 9 1.1834 1.0000 - - 2,959,148 3,501,785 22 8 1.1602 1.0000 - - 2,652,827 3,077,737 23 7 1.1374 1.0000 - - 2,327,478 2,647,330 24 6 1.1151 1.0000 - - 2,002,129 2,232,617 25 5 1.0933 1.0000 - - 1,672,629 1,828,613 26 4 1.0718 1.0000 - - 1,343,129 1,439,593 27 3 1.0508 1.0000 - - 1,010,848 1,062,203 28 2 1.0302 1.0000 - - 678,567 699,060 29 1 1.0100 1.0000 - - 339,284 342,676 PTD 1.0000 1.0000 - - - - 18,744 101,685,856$ Annual Interest Rate: 2.00% Total Escalated Expense for Entire Period 101,685,856$ Less Future Value of Initial Impact Fee Fund Balance 2,993,297 Sub-Total 98,692,559$ Total Escalated Vehicle Miles 18,744 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee for Roadway Service Area D 5,265$ Service Area D 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 5 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Project Funding Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area D Cost In Impact Fee Debt Funded (2)Non-Debt Impact Fee Street Name Service Area (1)Recoverable Cost(1)Existing Proposed Funded(2)Recoverable Cost BOBCAT $ 800,500 $ 150,012 $ - $ 120,010 $ 30,002 $ 150,012 FISHTRAP 1,469,500 275,381 - 220,305 55,076 275,381 GANZER 53,936,000 10,107,495 - 8,085,996 2,021,499 10,107,495 GRIBBLE SPRINGS 4,430,500 830,267 - 664,213 166,053 830,267 HARTLEE FIELD 6,025,500 1,129,166 - 903,333 225,833 1,129,166 HARTLEE FIELD 7,382,000 1,383,372 - 1,106,697 276,674 1,383,372 HARTLEE FIELD 427,500 80,113 - 64,090 16,023 80,113 HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 5,392,000 1,010,450 - 808,360 202,090 1,010,450 HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 8,386,000 1,571,519 - 1,257,215 314,304 1,571,519 HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 1,904,500 356,899 - 285,519 71,380 356,899 HARTLEE FLD-FM 2164 1,139,000 213,446 - 170,757 42,689 213,446 LONG 726,000 136,051 - 108,841 27,210 136,051 MINGO 1,315,000 246,428 - 197,143 49,286 246,428 MINGO 6,583,000 1,233,641 - 986,912 246,728 1,233,641 MINGO 7,937,000 1,487,377 - 1,189,902 297,475 1,487,377 KINGS ROW 3,779,000 708,177 - 566,541 141,635 708,177 SILVER DOME 1,558,500 292,060 - 233,648 58,412 292,060 COLLINS 3,409,000 638,840 - 511,072 127,768 638,840 COOPER CREEK 25,554,000 4,788,767 - 3,831,013 957,753 4,788,767 COOPER CREEK 6,226,000 1,166,740 - 933,392 233,348 1,166,740 COOPER CREEK 7,361,000 1,379,436 - 1,103,549 275,887 1,379,436 FM 2164 24,962,500 4,677,921 - 3,742,337 935,584 4,677,921 GREEN VALLEY 24,463,000 4,584,316 - 3,667,453 916,863 4,584,316 GREEN VALLEY 6,234,000 1,168,239 - 934,591 233,648 1,168,239 INDIAN WELLS 10,021,000 1,877,915 - 1,502,332 375,583 1,877,915 INDIAN WELLS 2,426,500 454,721 - 363,777 90,944 454,721 INDIAN WELLS 4,148,000 777,327 - 621,861 155,465 777,327 LOCUST 3,477,000 651,583 - 521,266 130,317 651,583 LOCUST 3,716,500 696,464 - 557,172 139,293 696,464 LOCUST 1,814,000 339,940 - 271,952 67,988 339,940 LOCUST 1,920,500 359,898 - 287,918 71,980 359,898 SHERMAN 4,713,000 883,206 - 706,565 176,641 883,206 SHERMAN 5,455,000 1,022,256 - 817,805 204,451 1,022,256 SHERMAN 7,223,000 1,353,575 - 1,082,860 270,715 1,353,575 SHERMAN 2,856,000 535,208 - 428,167 107,042 535,208 SHERMAN 3,328,000 623,660 - 498,928 124,732 623,660 SHERMAN 4,685,000 877,959 - 702,367 175,592 877,959 SHERMAN 2,357,000 441,697 - 353,358 88,339 441,697 SHERMAN 4,899,000 918,062 - 734,450 183,612 918,062 WINDSOR 1,225,000 229,562 - 183,650 45,912 229,562 37,660 37,660 - - 37,660 37,660 $ 275,703,160 $ 51,696,805 $ - $ 41,327,316 $ 10,369,489 $ 51,696,805 (1) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (2) Per discussions with City staff and City files 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 6 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Credit Determination Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area D Eligible Debt Annual Vehicle Eligible Debt Service per Annual Growth in Vehicle Miles Credit for Annual Ad Valorem Year Service(1)Miles Vehicle Mile (Cumulative)Rate Revenues 1 305,442$ 604,664 0.51$ 1,163 588$ 2 617,668 605,828 1.02 2,327 2,372 3 949,289 606,991 1.56 3,490 5,458 4 1,280,910 608,155 2.11 4,654 9,802 5 1,616,762 609,318 2.65 5,817 15,435 6 1,952,614 610,482 3.20 6,981 22,327 7 2,291,301 611,645 3.75 8,144 30,508 8 2,629,987 612,808 4.29 9,307 39,944 9 2,975,812 613,972 4.85 10,471 50,750 10 3,321,636 615,135 5.40 11,634 62,823 11 3,321,636 615,135 5.40 11,634 62,823 12 3,321,636 615,135 5.40 11,634 62,823 13 3,321,636 615,135 5.40 11,634 62,823 14 3,321,636 615,135 5.40 11,634 62,823 15 3,321,636 615,135 5.40 11,634 62,823 16 3,321,636 615,135 5.40 11,634 62,823 17 3,321,636 615,135 5.40 11,634 62,823 18 3,321,636 615,135 5.40 11,634 62,823 19 3,321,636 615,135 5.40 11,634 62,823 20 3,321,636 615,135 5.40 11,634 62,823 21 3,016,194 615,135 4.90 11,634 57,046 22 2,703,968 615,135 4.40 11,634 51,141 23 2,372,347 615,135 3.86 11,634 44,869 24 2,040,726 615,135 3.32 11,634 38,597 25 1,704,874 615,135 2.77 11,634 32,245 26 1,369,022 615,135 2.23 11,634 25,893 27 1,030,335 615,135 1.67 11,634 19,487 28 691,648 615,135 1.12 11,634 13,081 29 345,824 615,135 0.56 11,634 6,541 Total 66,432,715$ 1,157,132$ 2022 Vehicle Miles (All Service Areas) (2)603,501 Ten Year Growth in Vehicle Miles (Service Area D) (2)11,634 10 years Annual Growth in Vehicle Miles 1,163 Credit Amount 1,157,132$ (1) Appendix D - Service Area D, Page 3 (2) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas 7 of 7 Roadway Appendices I. General Assumptions Annual Interest Rate on Deposits (1)2.00% Annual Vehicle Mile Growth (2)2,415 Existing Fund Balance (3)4,840,794 Portion of Projects Funded by Existing Debt (3)299,581$ Non-debt Funded Project Cost (4)15,285,563 New Project Cost Funded Through New Debt (5)63,584,277 Total Recoverable Project Cost (6)79,169,421$ II. New Debt Issues Assumptions Year Principal (7)Interest (8)Term 1 6,358,428$ 4.05% 20 2 6,358,428 4.30% 20 3 6,358,428 5.00% 20 4 6,358,428 5.00% 20 5 6,358,428 5.15% 20 6 6,358,428 5.15% 20 7 6,358,428 5.25% 20 8 6,358,428 5.25% 20 9 6,358,428 5.50% 20 10 6,358,428 5.50% 20 Total 63,584,277$ III. Capital Expenditure Assumptions Annual Capital Year Expenditures (9) 1 1,528,556$ 2 3,648,032 3 5,767,508 4 7,886,984 5 7,886,984 6 7,886,984 7 7,886,984 8 7,886,984 9 7,886,984 10 7,886,984 11 6,358,428 12 4,238,952 13 2,119,476 Total 78,869,840 (1) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (2) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (3) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (4) Per discussions with City Staff and City files (5) This assumes 20% of new project costs funded through sources other than debt, unless specified otherwise (6) This assumes 80% of new project costs funded through new debt issues, unless specified otherwise (7) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (8) Assumes new debt issued in equal amounts every year (9) Estimated interest on future debt from City's Financial Advisor October 2022 (10) Assumes new debt proceeds expended over a 3-year timeframe Non-debt funded capital expenditures allocated per discussions with City Staff City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area E 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 1 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix E - Impact Fee Calculation AssumptionsDebt Service and Expense SummaryI. New Debt Service DetailTotalAnnualSeries Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series Series New DebtYear12345678910Service1469,938$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 469,938$ 2469,938 480,377 - - - - - - - - 950,315 3469,938 480,377 510,217 - - - - - - - 1,460,532 4469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 - - - - - - 1,970,748 5469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 - - - - - 2,487,474 6469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 - - - - 3,004,200 7469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 - - - 3,525,288 8469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 - - 4,046,376 9469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 - 4,578,445 10469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 5,110,514 11469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 5,110,514 12469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 5,110,514 13469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 5,110,514 14469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 5,110,514 15469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 5,110,514 16469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 5,110,514 17469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 5,110,514 18469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 5,110,514 19469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 5,110,514 20469,938 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 5,110,514 21- 480,377 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 4,640,576 22- - 510,217 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 4,160,199 23- - - 510,217 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 3,649,982 24- - - - 516,726 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 3,139,765 25- - - - - 516,726 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 2,623,039 26- - - - - - 521,088 521,088 532,069 532,069 2,106,313 27- - - - - - - 521,088 532,069 532,069 1,585,226 28- - - - - - - - 532,069 532,069 1,064,138 29- - - - - - - - - 532,069 532,069 9,398,761$ 9,607,539$ 10,204,334$ 10,204,334$ 10,334,519$ 10,334,519$ 10,421,753$ 10,421,753$ 10,641,379$ 10,641,379$ 102,210,271$ Service Area E2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasPage 2 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyAppendix E - Impact Fee Calculation AssumptionsDebt Service and Expense SummaryService Area EII. Summary of Annual ExpensesNew ExistingAnnual Annual Annual AnnualDebt Capital Bond Debt Annual TotalYearService(1)Expenditures(2)Proceeds(2)Service(3)Credit(4)Expense1469,938$ 1,528,556$ (6,358,428)$ 12,533$ (1,923)$ (4,349,323)$ 2950,315 3,648,032 (6,358,428) 12,532 (7,644) (1,755,193) 31,460,532 5,767,508 (6,358,428) 12,212 (17,469) 864,355 41,970,748 7,886,984 (6,358,428) 12,165 (31,237) 3,480,232 52,487,474 7,886,984 (6,358,428) 9,845 (48,983) 3,976,893 63,004,200 7,886,984 (6,358,428) 9,792 (70,663) 4,471,885 73,525,288 7,886,984 (6,358,428) 9,859 (96,319) 4,967,384 84,046,376 7,886,984 (6,358,428) 9,806 (125,814) 5,458,924 94,578,445 7,886,984 (6,358,428) 9,896 (159,492) 5,957,406 105,110,514 7,886,984 (6,358,428) 9,965 (197,005) 6,452,030 115,110,514 6,358,428 - 9,839 (197,000) 11,281,780 125,110,514 4,238,952 - 10,053 (197,008) 9,162,510 135,110,514 2,119,476 - 9,093 (196,971) 7,042,111 145,110,514 - - 52 (196,623) 4,913,942 155,110,514 - - - (196,621) 4,913,892 165,110,514 - - - (196,621) 4,913,892 175,110,514 - - - (196,621) 4,913,892 185,110,514 - - - (196,621) 4,913,892 195,110,514 - - - (196,621) 4,913,892 205,110,514 - - - (196,621) 4,913,892 214,640,576 - - - (178,541) 4,462,035 224,160,199 - - - (160,059) 4,000,140 233,649,982 - - - (140,429) 3,509,553 243,139,765 - - - (120,799) 3,018,966 252,623,039 - - - (100,918) 2,522,121 262,106,313 - - - (81,038) 2,025,275 271,585,226 - - - (60,990) 1,524,236 281,064,138 - - - (40,942) 1,023,196 29532,069 - - - (20,471) 511,598 PTD- - - 250,714 - 250,714 102,210,271$ 78,869,840$ (63,584,277)$ 388,356$ (3,628,065)$ 114,256,125$ (1) Appendix D - Service Area E, Page 2(2) Appendix D - Service Area E, Page 1(3) Eligible outstanding debt funded projects as a percent of total principal times original annual debt service, including Paid-To-Date (PTD) amounts(4) Appendix D - Service Area E, Page 72022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasPage 3 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Revenue Test Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Impact Estimated Impact Vehicle Fee Annual Accumulated Fund Year Fee Miles Revenue Expenses Sub-Total Interest Balance Initial 4,840,794$ 1 3,722$ 2,415 8,988,114$ (4,349,323)$ 13,337,437$ 230,190$ 18,408,421 2 3,722 2,415 8,988,114 (1,755,193) 10,743,306 475,601 29,627,329 3 3,722 2,415 8,988,114 864,355 8,123,758 673,784 38,424,871 4 3,722 2,415 8,988,114 3,480,232 5,507,881 823,576 44,756,329 5 3,722 2,415 8,988,114 3,976,893 5,011,220 945,239 50,712,788 6 3,722 2,415 8,988,114 4,471,885 4,516,228 1,059,418 56,288,434 7 3,722 2,415 8,988,114 4,967,384 4,020,730 1,165,976 61,475,140 8 3,722 2,415 8,988,114 5,458,924 3,529,189 1,264,795 66,269,124 9 3,722 2,415 8,988,114 5,957,406 3,030,708 1,355,690 70,655,522 10 3,722 2,415 8,988,114 6,452,030 2,536,084 1,438,471 74,630,076 11 - - - 11,281,780 (11,281,780) 1,379,784 64,728,080 12 - - - 9,162,510 (9,162,510) 1,202,936 56,768,506 13 - - - 7,042,111 (7,042,111) 1,064,949 50,791,344 14 - - - 4,913,942 (4,913,942) 966,687 46,844,090 15 - - - 4,913,892 (4,913,892) 887,743 42,817,941 16 - - - 4,913,892 (4,913,892) 807,220 38,711,268 17 - - - 4,913,892 (4,913,892) 725,086 34,522,462 18 - - - 4,913,892 (4,913,892) 641,310 30,249,880 19 - - - 4,913,892 (4,913,892) 555,859 25,891,847 20 - - - 4,913,892 (4,913,892) 468,698 21,446,652 21 - - - 4,462,035 (4,462,035) 384,313 17,368,931 22 - - - 4,000,140 (4,000,140) 307,377 13,676,168 23 - - - 3,509,553 (3,509,553) 238,428 10,405,043 24 - - - 3,018,966 (3,018,966) 177,911 7,563,988 25 - - - 2,522,121 (2,522,121) 126,059 5,167,926 26 - - - 2,025,275 (2,025,275) 83,106 3,225,756 27 - - - 1,524,236 (1,524,236) 49,273 1,750,793 28 - - - 1,023,196 (1,023,196) 24,784 752,381 29 - - - 511,598 (511,598) 9,932 250,714 PTD - - - 250,714 (250,714) - - 89,881,135$ 114,256,125$ 19,534,195$ Service Area E 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton Texas Page 4 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Calculation Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Future Value Escalation Number of Interest Recovery Years to Rate Fee Annual Vehicle Miles Annual Expense Year End of Period Factor Factor Actual Escalated Actual Escalated 1 29 1.7584 1.0000 2,415 4,246 (4,349,323)$ (7,648,000)$ 2 28 1.7240 1.0000 2,415 4,163 (1,755,193) (3,025,874) 3 27 1.6902 1.0000 2,415 4,081 864,355 1,460,892 4 26 1.6570 1.0000 2,415 4,001 3,480,232 5,766,787 5 25 1.6245 1.0000 2,415 3,923 3,976,893 6,460,549 6 24 1.5927 1.0000 2,415 3,846 4,471,885 7,122,230 7 23 1.5614 1.0000 2,415 3,771 4,967,384 7,756,269 8 22 1.5308 1.0000 2,415 3,697 5,458,924 8,356,647 9 21 1.5008 1.0000 2,415 3,624 5,957,406 8,940,915 10 20 1.4714 1.0000 2,415 3,553 6,452,030 9,493,383 11 19 1.4425 1.0000 - - 11,281,780 16,274,292 12 18 1.4142 1.0000 - - 9,162,510 12,958,023 13 17 1.3865 1.0000 - - 7,042,111 9,763,982 14 16 1.3593 1.0000 - - 4,913,942 6,679,654 15 15 1.3327 1.0000 - - 4,913,892 6,548,614 16 14 1.3065 1.0000 - - 4,913,892 6,420,210 17 13 1.2809 1.0000 - - 4,913,892 6,294,324 18 12 1.2558 1.0000 - - 4,913,892 6,170,906 19 11 1.2312 1.0000 - - 4,913,892 6,049,907 20 10 1.2070 1.0000 - - 4,913,892 5,931,282 21 9 1.1834 1.0000 - - 4,462,035 5,280,265 22 8 1.1602 1.0000 - - 4,000,140 4,640,852 23 7 1.1374 1.0000 - - 3,509,553 3,991,850 24 6 1.1151 1.0000 - - 3,018,966 3,366,515 25 5 1.0933 1.0000 - - 2,522,121 2,757,325 26 4 1.0718 1.0000 - - 2,025,275 2,170,731 27 3 1.0508 1.0000 - - 1,524,236 1,601,673 28 2 1.0302 1.0000 - - 1,023,196 1,054,097 29 1 1.0100 1.0000 - - 511,598 516,714 PTD 1.0000 1.0000 - - 250,714 250,714 38,905 153,405,728$ Annual Interest Rate: 2.00% Total Escalated Expense for Entire Period 153,405,728$ Less Future Value of Initial Impact Fee Fund Balance 8,596,499 Sub-Total 144,809,229$ Total Escalated Vehicle Miles 38,905 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee for Roadway Service Area E 3,722$ Service Area E 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 5 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Project Funding Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area E Cost In Impact Fee Debt Funded (2)Non-Debt Impact Fee Street Name Service Area (1)Recoverable Cost(1)Existing Proposed Funded(2)Recoverable Cost AUDRA $ 1,687,000 $ 436,939 $ - $ 349,552 $ 87,388 $ 436,939 BLAGG 11,181,000 2,895,922 - 2,316,738 579,184 2,895,922 BLAGG 7,651,000 1,981,638 - 1,585,311 396,328 1,981,638 BLAGG 281,500 72,910 - 58,328 14,582 72,910 DALLAS 3,624,000 938,630 - 750,904 187,726 938,630 DUCHESS 5,949,000 1,540,814 - 1,232,651 308,163 1,540,814 FM 426 9,953,000 2,577,865 - 2,062,292 515,573 2,577,865 MCKINNEY 1,551,000 401,715 - - 401,715 401,715 MCKINNEY 1,914,000 495,733 - 396,587 99,147 495,733 MCKINNEY 3,270,000 846,943 - 677,554 169,389 846,943 MCKINNEY 9,268,000 2,400,448 - 1,920,358 480,090 2,400,448 MCKINNEY 4,399,000 1,139,358 - 911,486 227,872 1,139,358 MILLS 23,115,000 5,986,874 - 4,789,499 1,197,375 5,986,874 MILLS 5,235,000 1,355,885 - 1,084,708 271,177 1,355,885 MINGO 2,172,000 562,556 - 450,045 112,511 562,556 MINGO 7,268,000 1,882,440 - 1,505,952 376,488 1,882,440 MINGO 8,381,000 2,170,711 - 1,736,569 434,142 2,170,711 MINGO 2,700,000 699,310 - 559,448 139,862 699,310 MINGO 1,714,000 443,933 - 355,146 88,787 443,933 MINGO 6,583,000 1,705,022 - 1,364,018 341,004 1,705,022 MINGO 671,000 173,792 - 139,033 34,758 173,792 MINGO 2,813,000 728,578 - 582,862 145,716 728,578 MORSE 1,969,000 509,979 - 407,983 101,996 509,979 SHADY OAKS 9,967,000 2,581,491 - 2,065,193 516,298 2,581,491 SPENCER 6,862,000 1,777,284 - 1,421,828 355,457 1,777,284 TREATMENT PLANT 4,731,000 1,225,347 - 980,278 245,069 1,225,347 TREATMENT PLANT 5,015,000 1,298,904 - 1,039,123 259,781 1,298,904 TREATMENT PLANT 11,310,000 2,929,333 - 2,343,467 585,867 2,929,333 BONNIE BRAE 4,155,000 1,076,161 - 860,929 215,232 1,076,161 BONNIE BRAE 1,528,000 395,758 - 316,606 79,152 395,758 BONNIE BRAE 1,685,000 436,421 - 349,137 87,284 436,421 BONNIE BRAE 543,500 140,769 - 112,615 28,154 140,769 BONNIE BRAE 2,035,000 527,073 - 421,658 105,415 527,073 BONNIE BRAE 1,228,500 318,186 - 254,549 63,637 318,186 CARDINAL 3,167,000 820,265 - 656,212 164,053 820,265 GEESLING 8,237,000 2,133,415 - 1,706,732 426,683 2,133,415 GEESLING 18,210,000 4,716,460 - 3,773,168 943,292 4,716,460 LAKEVIEW 2,294,000 594,155 - 475,324 118,831 594,155 MAYHILL 2,467,000 638,962 35,868 570,030 33,064 638,962 MAYHILL 2,155,000 558,153 31,337 497,930 28,887 558,153 MAYHILL 409,500 106,062 5,952 94,623 5,487 106,062 MAYHILL 243,500 63,067 3,533 56,277 3,257 63,067 MAYHILL 1,142,000 295,782 16,590 263,899 15,293 295,782 MAYHILL 2,066,000 535,102 30,031 477,388 27,683 535,102 MAYHILL 2,161,000 559,707 31,414 499,336 28,958 559,707 MAYHILL 3,717,000 962,717 54,071 858,802 49,844 962,717 MAYHILL 3,864,000 1,000,791 48,925 906,765 45,100 1,000,791 MAYHILL 4,477,000 1,159,560 41,859 1,079,114 38,587 1,159,560 MAYHILL 1,840,000 476,567 - 381,254 95,313 476,567 MAYHILL CONNECTOR 2,071,000 536,397 - 429,118 107,279 536,397 MOCKINGBIRD 1,217,000 315,208 - 252,166 63,042 315,208 MOCKINGBIRD 7,039,000 1,823,128 - 1,458,502 364,626 1,823,128 MOCKINGBIRD 6,721,000 1,740,765 - 1,392,612 348,153 1,740,765 POST OAK 20,228,000 5,239,130 - 4,191,304 1,047,826 5,239,130 POST OAK 21,525,000 5,575,058 - 4,460,046 1,115,012 5,575,058 POST OAK 8,015,000 2,075,916 - 1,660,733 415,183 2,075,916 SWISHER 3,750,000 971,264 - 777,012 194,253 971,264 TEASLEY 2,077,000 537,951 - 430,361 107,590 537,951 N STAR 2,427,000 628,602 - 502,882 125,720 628,602 ROY 1,594,000 412,852 - 330,282 82,570 412,852 37,660 37,660 - - 37,660 37,660 $ 305,561,160 $ 79,169,421 $ 299,581 $ 63,584,277 $ 15,285,563 $ 79,169,421 (1) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study (2) Per discussions with City staff and City files 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas Page 6 of 7 Roadway Appendices City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study Credit Determination Appendix E - Impact Fee Calculation Assumptions Service Area E Eligible Debt Annual Vehicle Eligible Debt Service per Annual Growth in Vehicle Miles Credit for Annual Ad Valorem Year Service(1)Miles Vehicle Mile (Cumulative)Rate Revenues 1 482,471$ 605,916 0.80$ 2,415 1,923$ 2 962,847 608,331 1.58 4,830 7,644 3 1,472,744 610,745 2.41 7,244 17,469 4 1,982,913 613,160 3.23 9,659 31,237 5 2,497,320 615,575 4.06 12,074 48,983 6 3,013,992 617,990 4.88 14,489 70,663 7 3,535,147 620,405 5.70 16,904 96,319 8 4,056,182 622,819 6.51 19,318 125,814 9 4,588,341 625,234 7.34 21,733 159,492 10 5,120,478 627,649 8.16 24,148 197,005 11 5,120,353 627,649 8.16 24,148 197,000 12 5,120,566 627,649 8.16 24,148 197,008 13 5,119,606 627,649 8.16 24,148 196,971 14 5,110,565 627,649 8.14 24,148 196,623 15 5,110,514 627,649 8.14 24,148 196,621 16 5,110,514 627,649 8.14 24,148 196,621 17 5,110,514 627,649 8.14 24,148 196,621 18 5,110,514 627,649 8.14 24,148 196,621 19 5,110,514 627,649 8.14 24,148 196,621 20 5,110,514 627,649 8.14 24,148 196,621 21 4,640,576 627,649 7.39 24,148 178,541 22 4,160,199 627,649 6.63 24,148 160,059 23 3,649,982 627,649 5.82 24,148 140,429 24 3,139,765 627,649 5.00 24,148 120,799 25 2,623,039 627,649 4.18 24,148 100,918 26 2,106,313 627,649 3.36 24,148 81,038 27 1,585,226 627,649 2.53 24,148 60,990 28 1,064,138 627,649 1.70 24,148 40,942 29 532,069 627,649 0.85 24,148 20,471 Total 102,347,912$ 3,628,065$ 2022 Vehicle Miles (All Service Areas) (2)603,501 Ten Year Growth in Vehicle Miles (Service Area E) (2)24,148 10 years Annual Growth in Vehicle Miles 2,415 Credit Amount 3,628,065$ (1) Appendix D - Service Area E, Page 3 (2) Per Kimley-Horn Impact Fee Study 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study City of Denton, Texas 7 of 7 Roadway Appendices 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study May 2024 City of Denton, Texas Appendix F – Consideration for the Hunter Ranch and Cole Ranch Operating Agreements Consideration for Hunter Ranch and Cole Ranch Operating Agreement The City of Denton has operating agreements with the Hunter Ranch District and the Cole Ranch District which stipulate certain calculations to be included in the Roadway Impact Fee Study. The purpose of this appendix is to explain what calculations are included as part of the operating agreements, how the calculations were performed, and how they will be used in the administration of both the Impact Fee Program and the operating agreements. The terms City Offsites, District Cost, District Area Revenue, and District Tax Revenue are defined in Section 4.11 of the operating agreements. “City Offsites” Facilities The operating agreements define City Offsites as specific roadways that are to be constructed by the City. The City Offsites are described on Exhibits K and K-1 of the operating agreements. City Offsites facilities are impact fee eligible roadways that are anticipated to be funded in part by impact fees collected within the service area (including within the districts) and by district financial participation in the form of a District Tax assessed and paid from properties in the districts. As part of the operating agreements, the Roadway Impact Fee study is to include a capacity analysis which shows “what portion of each City Offsite will serve the District Area and what portion will serve other areas of the City.” This preliminary non-binding analysis is provided in the tables included in this appendix, and will be updated based on a traffic study that contains a separate analysis for each City Offsite. A map identifying the City Offsite facilities and development Improvement Projects as identified within the context of the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee CIP is provided in Exhibit F.1. The original map of the City Off-sites from the operating agreement is included in Exhibit F.2. Administration of the Impact Fee Program Impact fees will be administered in accordance with the operating agreements, and in the event of a conflict between this Appendix F and the operating agreements, the operating agreements control. Hunter Ranch5/15/2024VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESSLENGTH LENGTH MTPROADWAYCAPACITYSUPPLYTOTALCAPACITY(FT)4(MI)CLASSIFICATIONSTATUSPK-HRPK-HRDEMANDPK-HRPER LNTOTAL1PK-HR2VEH-MI3A-12 51039 JIM CHRISTAL IH 35 OLD SH 24 3,110 0.59 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,290 100% 750 1770 761 1,00910,332,000$ 10,332,000$ A-13,C-10 51039 JIM CHRISTAL OLD SH 24 WESTERN 2,905 0.55 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,056 50% 750 825 290 5359,746,000$ 4,873,000$ A-14,C-11 51039 JIM CHRISTAL WESTERN MASCH BRANCH 3,510 0.66 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 910 50% 750 990 300 69011,964,000$ 5,982,000$ A-15,C-12 51039 JIM CHRISTAL MASCH BRANCH THOMAS J EGAN 5,975 1.13 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 239 50% 750 1695 135 1,56018,502,000$ 9,251,000$ A-18 52758 ROBSON RANCH IH 35W 5,745' W of IH-35W5,745 1.096 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 808 50% 850 2780 441 2,33920,953,000$ 10,476,500$ A-28 52897 THOMAS J EGAN JIM CHRISTAL 2915' S OF JIM CRISTAL 2,915 0.55 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1650 0 1,6506,984,000$ 6,984,000$ A-29 52897 THOMAS J EGAN 1830' N OF FM 1515 FM 1515 1,830 0.35 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 50% 750 525 0 5254,635,000$ 2,317,500$ A-30 52808 UNDERWOOD SPRINGSIDE UNDERWOOD CONNECTOR 4,000 0.76 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 692 100% 850 3876 526 3,35015,229,000$ 15,229,000$ B-2 52776 ALLRED BRUSH CREEK JOHN PAINE 1,610 0.30 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1,171 50% 850 765 176 5895,424,000$ 2,712,000$ B-6 52776 BRUSH CREEK FORT WORTH 590' E OF ALLRED 3,615 0.68 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 3468 0 3,46810,698,000$ 10,698,000$ B-25 45891 VINTAGE FORT WORTH BONNIE BRAE 4,605 0.87 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 423 100% 850 4437 368 406911,721,000$ 11,721,000$ B-27 45891 VINTAGE BONNIE BRAE NAPA VALLEY 765 0.14 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 1,874 100% 850 714 262 4521,665,000$ 1,665,000$ B-2845891VINTAGENAPA VALLEYIH 35W3,4350.656PRIMARY ARTERIALPA (1/3)Widening1,874100%850331512182,0977,975,000$ 7,975,000$ 26,8104,47722,333135,828,000$ 100,216,000$ A 52773 H LIVELY I-35W C WOLFE 14,275 2.70 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 30% 850 4131 0 4,131-$ -$ A 52828 HUNTER ARTERIAL FM 2449 UNDERWOOD 10,451 1.98 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 50% 750 2970 0 2,970-$ -$ A 52824 HUNTER COLLECTORHUNTER ARTERIAL UNDERWOOD 11,391 2.16 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 2376 0 2,376-$ -$ A 52756 HUNTER COLLECTOR AHUNTER ARTERIAL ROBSON RANCH 13,264 2.51 6 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 8283 0 8,283-$ -$ A 52767 HUNTER COLLECTOR C HUNTER COLLECTOR A HUNTER COLLECTOR B 2,886 0.55 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 605 0 605-$ -$ A 52953 UNDERWOOD 1610' N OF H LIVELY H LIVELY 1,608 0.30 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 1530 0 1,530-$ -$ A 52953 UNDERWOOD H LIVELY ROBSON RANCH 12,039 2.28 6 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 10260 0 10,260-$ -$ B 52771 ALLRED JOHN PAINE 365' W OF IH-35W 1,482 0.28 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1,308 100% 850 1428 366 1,062-$ -$ B 52771 ALLRED 365' W OF IH-35W IH-35W 365 0.07 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1,438 100% 850 357 101 256-$ -$ B 52853 JOHN PAINE VINTAGE ALLRED 6,370 1.21 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 3630 0 3,630-$ -$ B 52777 JOHN PAINE ALLRED TEXOMA 2,660 0.50 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1500 0 1,500-$ -$ 37,07046736,603-$ -$ TOTAL VEHICLE-MILES PROVIDED BY HUNTER-COLE RANCH 63,8801. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area]TOTAL VEH-MILES OF EXISTING DEMAND 4,9442. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area]NET AMOUNT OF CAPACITY ADDED 58,9363. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total]TOTAL COST OF OFF-SITE FACILITIES 100,216,000$ Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280].COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED 92,459,771$ HUNTER RANCH 10-YEAR VEHICLE-MILE DEMAND 9,220PERCENT OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH 15.6%COST OF OFF-SITES ATTRIBUTABLE TO 10-YR GROWTH 14,464,488$ ESTIMATED COST OF FINANCING (46%) 6,653,665$ ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS (24%) (3,471,477)$ ESTIMATED CREDIT FOR AD VALOREM TAXES (5.4%) (781,082)$ RECOVERABLE COST OF IMPACT FEE CIP AND FINANCING (ATTRIBUTABLE TO OFF-SITE FACILITIES)16,865,593$ DEVELOPMENT BUILT FACILITIES (NOT INCLUDED IN IMPACT FEE CIP)SUBTOTALOperating Agreement Project No. #4. The length of Robson Ranch shown in operating agreement is less than the length of project A-18. The reduced length has been shown in this table to align with the operating agreement.City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyHunter Ranch District Capacity AnalysisProject ID #ROADWAYLIMITSLANESIMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATIONPEAK HOUR VOLUME% IN DISTRICTTOTAL PROJECT COSTTOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREAFROM TOSUBTOTALCITY OFF-SITES (INCLUDED IN IMPACT FEE CIP) 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix F - Consideration for the Hunter Ranch and Cole Ranch Operating Agreements Cole Ranch5/15/2024VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESSLENGTH LENGTH MTPROADWAYCAPACITYSUPPLYTOTALCAPACITY(FT)4(MI)CLASSIFICATIONSTATUSPK-HRPK-HRDEMANDPK-HRPER LNTOTAL1PK-HR2VEH-MI3A-12 51039 JIM CHRISTAL IH 35 OLD SH 24 3,110 0.59 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,290 100% 750 1770 761 1,00910,332,000$ 10,332,000$ A-13,C-10 51039 JIM CHRISTAL OLD SH 24 WESTERN 2,905 0.55 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 1,056 50% 750 825 290 5359,746,000$ 4,873,000$ A-14,C-11 51039 JIM CHRISTAL WESTERN MASCH BRANCH 3,510 0.66 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 910 50% 750 990 300 69011,964,000$ 5,982,000$ A-15,C-12 51039 JIM CHRISTAL MASCH BRANCH THOMAS J EGAN 5,975 1.13 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA Widening 239 50% 750 1695 135 1,56018,502,000$ 9,251,000$ A-18 52758 ROBSON RANCH IH 35W 5,745' W of IH-35W5,745 1.096 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 808 50% 850 2780 441 2,33920,953,000$ 10,476,500$ A-28 52897 THOMAS J EGAN JIM CHRISTAL 2915' S OF JIM CRISTAL 2,915 0.55 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1650 0 1,6506,984,000$ 6,984,000$ A-29 52897 THOMAS J EGAN 1830' N OF FM 1515 FM 1515 1,830 0.35 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 50% 750 525 0 5254,635,000$ 2,317,500$ A-30 52808 UNDERWOOD SPRINGSIDE UNDERWOOD CONNECTOR 4,000 0.76 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 692 100% 850 3876 526 3,35015,229,000$ 15,229,000$ B-2 52776 ALLRED BRUSH CREEKJOHN PAINE 1,610 0.30 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1,171 50% 850 765 176 5895,424,000$ 2,712,000$ B-6 52776 BRUSH CREEK FORT WORTH 590' E OF ALLRED 3,615 0.68 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 3468 0 3,46810,698,000$ 10,698,000$ B-25 45891 VINTAGE FORT WORTH BONNIE BRAE 4,605 0.87 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 423 100% 850 4437 368 406911,721,000$ 11,721,000$ B-26 45891 VINTAGE BONNIE BRAE NAPA VALLEY 765 0.14 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA (1/3) Widening 1,874 100% 850 714 262 4521,665,000$ 1,665,000$ B-2745891VINTAGENAPA VALLEYIH 35W3,4350.656PRIMARY ARTERIALPA (1/3)Widening1,874100%850331512182,0977,975,000$ 7,975,000$ 26,8104,47722,333135,828,000$ 100,216,000$ A 52866 AMYX LOOP 288 C WOLFE 6,855 1.30 2 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 1950 0 1,950-$ -$ A 52790 FM 2449 LOOP 288 780' W OF LOOP 288 778 0.15 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 765 0 765-$ -$ A 52790 FM 2449 780' W OF LOOP 288 4380' E OF C WOLFE 1,904 0.36 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 1836 0 1,836-$ -$ A 52790 FM 2449 4380' E OF C WOLFE C WOLFE 4,382 0.83 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 1,364 100% 850 4233 1132 3,101-$ -$ A 52872 FM 2499 OUTER LOOP UNDERWOOD 5,687 1.08 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 1188 0 1,188-$ -$ A 52773 H LIVELY I-35W C WOLFE 14,275 2.70 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 70% 850 9639 0 9,639-$ -$ A 52823 AMYX-H LIVELY AMYX H LIVELY 9,395 1.78 2 COLLECTOR C New New 100% 550 1958 0 1,958-$ -$ A 52879 FM 1515-H LIVELY FM 1515 H LIVELY 12,255 2.32 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 100% 750 6960 0 6,960-$ -$ A 52828 HUNTER ARTERIAL FM 2449 UNDERWOOD 10,451 1.98 4 SECONDARY ARTERIAL SA New New 50% 750 2970 0 2,970-$ -$ A 52953 UNDERWOOD UNDERWOOD CONNECTOR FM 2449 2,026 0.38 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA New New 100% 850 1938 0 1,938-$ -$ A 52953 UNDERWOOD LOOP 288 1610' N OF H LIVELY 5,909 1.12 6 PRIMARY ARTERIAL PA Widening 60 100% 850 5712 67 5,645-$ -$ 39,1491,19937,950-$ -$ TOTAL VEHICLE-MILES PROVIDED BY COLE RANCH 65,9591. Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total = [Length (mi)] * [Exist Lanes] * [Veh-Mi Capacity Pk-Hr Per Ln] * [% in Service Area]TOTAL VEH-MILES OF EXISTING DEMAND 5,6762. Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total = [ Length (mi)] * [PM Peak Hour Vol] * [% In Service Area]NET AMOUNT OF CAPACITY ADDED 60,2833. Excess Capacity Pk-Hr Veh-Mi = [Veh-Mi Supply Pk-Hr Total] - [Veh-Mi Demand Pk-Hr Total]TOTAL COST OF OFF-SITE FACILITIES 100,216,000$ Note: Mileage lengths are shown as rounded to the nearest 0.01. Actual calculations were performed using exact mileage length [Length (ft) / 5,280].COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED 91,592,067$ COLE RANCH 10-YEAR VEHICLE-MILE DEMAND 5,993PERCENT OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH 9.9%COST OF OFF-SITES ATTRIBUTABLE TO 10-YR GROWTH 9,105,573$ ESTIMATED COST OF FINANCING (46%) 4,188,564$ ESTIMATED INTEREST EARNINGS (24%) (2,185,338)$ ESTIMATED CREDIT FOR AD VALOREM TAXES (5.4%) (491,701)$ RECOVERABLE COST OF IMPACT FEE CIP AND FINANCING (ATTRIBUTABLE TO OFF-SITE FACILITIES)9,617,098$ 4. The length of Robson Ranch shown in operating agreement is less than the length of project A-18. The reduced length has been shown in this table to align with the operating agreement.SUBTOTALTOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREAFROM TOCITY OFF-SITES (INCLUDED IN IMPACT FEE CIP)SUBTOTALDEVELOPMENT BUILT FACILITIES (NOT INCLUDED IN IMPACT FEE CIP)Operating Agreement Project No. #City of Denton - 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCole Ranch District Capacity AnalysisProject ID #ROADWAYLIMITSLANESIMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATIONPEAK HOUR VOLUME% IN DISTRICTTOTAL PROJECT COST 2022 Roadway Impact Fee StudyCity of Denton, TexasAppendix F - Consideration for the Hunter Ranch and Cole Ranch Operating Agreements H LIVELYMASCH BRANCH NAILWELCHNORTHTEXASBELLBERNARDOAKLOCUSTACMEEAGLEJIMCHRISTALCARRAVEARUDDELL FULTONFM1515PADALLASHICKORYMORSEC O C WOLFESAMBASSBONNIEBRAECOLLINSEL PASEOPRAIRIEPANHANDLEFM 156SOUT H RI D G E MCCORMICK SCRIPTUREFM 2449NSANJACINTOMCKINNEYRIVERPASSHICKORY HILLCENTREPLACECREEKDALEDUNCAN MONTECITO FORT WORTHJOHNPAINECOUNTRYCLUBCORBINBRUSHCREEKFM1515RYANTHOMAS J EGANALLREDHICKORYCREEKFM 1830RYANH LIVELYSPENCMONTECITOFORTWORTHWIND RIVWESTERN FINCHERAMYXSHADYROSELAWNROBSON RANCHHUNTERARTERIALFM 1515-HLIVELYOLD ALTONUNDERWOODHUNTER COLLECTOR AIH 35WIH 35EE-21C-48B-32A-6B-17B-39B-29B-11B-26B-3C-50A-21E-22C-46B-45A-4C-47B-37B-28BB-42A-2C-49C31B-18E-12A-5B-2A-29A-20B-44E-58B-10B-4B-16A-28C-15A-25B-9A-9B-5B-15E-20A-27A-22C30B-31 C-29B-20B-41A-13A-1E-24A-12 C-14B-8EA-26B-23A-24A-17B-27A-7B-24B-34B-7A-14B-6A-8B-19A-10A-16EA-30C-70 B-22C-64A-31A-33C-71 B-1A-11B-14B-25E-5B-43B-33B-36B-30B-38A-3A-15A-32B-35A-19A-23A-18E-32E-34E-30E-31E-33C-10C-11C-13C-12B-40527735279045891527715280852777527675103952897 52776528725275852853528665282352828528245295352879 5 2 7 5 6LegendNewWideningOther ThoroughfaresOther Thoroughfares (Future)Hunter Ranch & Cole RanchCity Off-SitesImprovement ProjectsFEMA FloodwayETJNAAExhibit F.1 - City Off-SitesHunter Ranch and Cole Ranch00.51Miles¯###Operating Agreement ID Exhibit F.2 - City Off-sites Hunter Ranch and Cole Ranch Operating Agreement (;+,%,7%  6&+('8/( 0$;,080$66(66$%/(52$':$<,03$&7)((3(56(59,&(81,7   6&+('8/( 52$':$<,03$&7)((&2//(&7,215$7(3(56(59,&(81,7  ƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚĂƚĞ ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů EŽŶͲZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů EŽŶͲZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů ΨϰϬϴ͘ϭϲ ΨϯϬϲ͘ϭϮ Ψϳϵϲ͘ϴϬ Ψϯϵϴ͘ϰϬ ΨϰϬϴ͘ϭϲ ΨϯϬϲ͘ϭϮ Ψϳϵϲ͘ϴϬ Ψϯϵϴ͘ϰϬ ΨϰϬϴ͘ϭϲ ΨϯϬϲ͘ϭϮ Ψϳϵϲ͘ϴϬ Ψϯϵϴ͘ϰϬ ΨϰϬϴ͘ϭϲ ΨϯϬϲ͘ϭϮ Ψϳϵϲ͘ϴϬ Ψϯϵϴ͘ϰϬ ΨϰϬϴ͘ϭϲ ΨϯϬϲ͘ϭϮ Ψϳϵϲ͘ϴϬ Ψϯϵϴ͘ϰϬ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƌĞĂƐ >ĂŶĚhƐĞdLJƉĞ >ĂŶĚhƐĞdLJƉĞ WƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐƉůĂƚƚĞĚŽŶŽƌďĞĨŽƌĞ ϭϮͬϯϭͬϮϬϮϰ WƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐƉůĂƚƚĞĚŽŶŽƌĂĨƚĞƌ ϭͬϭͬϮϬϮϱ džŚŝďŝƚͲ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞϮZŽĂĚǁĂLJ/ŵƉĂĐƚ&ĞĞŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞWĞƌ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞhŶŝƚ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƌĞĂ DĂdžŝŵƵŵƐƐĞƐƐĂďůĞ ZŽĂĚǁĂLJ/ŵƉĂĐƚ&ĞĞ WĞƌ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞhŶŝƚ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƌĞĂΨϮ͕ϰϵϲ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƌĞĂϯ͕ϳϰϮΨ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƌĞĂϰ͕ϲϵϱΨ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƌĞĂϱ͕ϮϲϱΨ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƌĞĂϯ͕ϳϮϮΨ džŚŝďŝƚͲ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞϭ (;+,%,7& /$1'86((48,9$/(1&<7$%/(   >ĂŶĚhƐĞĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ /d>ĂŶĚ hƐĞŽĚĞ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚhŶŝƚƐ dƌŝƉ'ĞŶ ZĂƚĞ ;WDͿ WĂƐƐͲ ďLJ ZĂƚĞ WĂƐƐͲ ďLJ ^ŽƵƌĐĞ dƌŝƉ ZĂƚĞ dƌŝƉ >ĞŶŐƚŚ ;ŵŝͿ Ěũ͘ &ŽƌKͲ  Ěũ͘dƌŝƉ >ĞŶŐƚŚ ;ŵŝͿ DĂdždƌŝƉ >ĞŶŐƚŚ ;ŵŝͿ sĞŚͲDŝ WĞƌĞǀͲ hŶŝƚ WKZdEdZD/E> /ŶƚĞƌŵŽĚĂůdƌƵĐŬdĞƌŵŝŶĂů ϬϯϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϭ͘ϴϳ ϭ͘ϴϳ ϭϬ͘ϬϮ ϱϬй ϱ͘Ϭϭ ϱ͘Ϭϭϵ͘ϯϳ /Eh^dZ/> 'ĞŶĞƌĂů>ŝŐŚƚ/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂů ϭϭϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& Ϭ͘ϲϱ Ϭ͘ϲϱ ϭϬ͘ϬϮ ϱϬй ϱ͘Ϭϭ ϱ͘Ϭϭ ϯ͘Ϯϲ /ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂůWĂƌŬ ϭϯϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& Ϭ͘ϯϰ Ϭ͘ϯϰ ϭϬ͘ϬϮ ϱϬй ϱ͘Ϭϭ ϱ͘Ϭϭ ϭ͘ϳϬ tĂƌĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ϭϱϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& Ϭ͘ϭϴ Ϭ͘ϭϴ ϭϬ͘ϬϮ ϱϬй ϱ͘Ϭϭ ϱ͘Ϭϭ Ϭ͘ϵϬ DŝŶŝͲtĂƌĞŚŽƵƐĞ ϭϱϭ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& Ϭ͘ϭϱ Ϭ͘ϭϱ ϭϬ͘ϬϮ ϱϬй ϱ͘Ϭϭ ϱ͘Ϭϭ Ϭ͘ϳϱ Z^/Ed/> ^ŝŶŐůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJĞƚĂĐŚĞĚ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ ϮϭϬ ǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ Ϭ͘ϵϰ Ϭ͘ϵϰ ϵ͘ϳϵ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϬ ϰ͘ϵϬ ϰ͘ϲϭ DƵůƚŝĨĂŵŝůLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ;>ŽǁͲZŝƐĞͿ ϮϮϬ ǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ Ϭ͘ϱϭ Ϭ͘ϱϭ ϵ͘ϳϵ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϬ ϰ͘ϵϬ Ϯ͘ϱϬ DƵůƚŝĨĂŵŝůLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ;DŝĚͲZŝƐĞͿ ϮϮϭ ǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ Ϭ͘ϯϵ Ϭ͘ϯϵ ϵ͘ϳϵ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϬ ϰ͘ϵϬ ϭ͘ϵϭ DƵůƚŝĨĂŵŝůLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ;,ŝŐŚͲZŝƐĞͿ ϮϮϮ ǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ Ϭ͘ϯϮ Ϭ͘ϯϮ ϵ͘ϳϵ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϬ ϰ͘ϵϬ ϭ͘ϱϳ ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůŽŶĚŽŵŝŶŝƵŵͬdŽǁŶŚŽŵĞ ϮϯϬ ǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ Ϭ͘ϯϲ Ϭ͘ϯϲ ϵ͘ϳϵ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϬ ϰ͘ϵϬ ϭ͘ϳϲ ^ĞŶŝŽƌĚƵůƚ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐͲ^ŝŶŐůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJ Ϯϱϭ ǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ Ϭ͘ϯϬ Ϭ͘ϯϬ ϵ͘ϳϵ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϬ ϰ͘ϵϬ ϭ͘ϰϳ ^ĞŶŝŽƌĚƵůƚ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐͲDƵůƚŝĨĂŵŝůLJ ϮϱϮ ǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ Ϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϳϵ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϬ ϰ͘ϵϬ ϭ͘Ϯϯ ƐƐŝƐƚĞĚ>ŝǀŝŶŐ Ϯϱϰ ĞĚƐ Ϭ͘Ϯϰ Ϭ͘Ϯϰ ϵ͘ϳϵ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϬ ϰ͘ϵϬ ϭ͘ϭϴ >K'/E' ,ŽƚĞů ϯϭϬ ZŽŽŵ Ϭ͘ϱϵ Ϭ͘ϱϵ ϲ͘ϰϯ ϱϬй ϯ͘Ϯϭ ϯ͘Ϯϭ ϭ͘ϴϵ DŽƚĞů ϯϮϬ ZŽŽŵ Ϭ͘ϯϲ Ϭ͘ϯϲ ϲ͘ϰϯ ϱϬй ϯ͘Ϯϭ ϯ͘Ϯϭ ϭ͘ϭϲ ZZd/KE> 'ŽůĨƌŝǀŝŶŐZĂŶŐĞ ϰϯϮ dĞĞƐͬƌŝǀŝŶŐWŽƐŝƚŝŽŶƐ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϳ͘ϴϲ ϱϬй ϯ͘ϵϯϯ͘ϵϯϰ͘ϵϭ 'ŽůĨŽƵƌƐĞ ϰϯϬ ĐƌĞ Ϭ͘Ϯϴ Ϭ͘Ϯϴ ϳ͘ϴϲ ϱϬй ϯ͘ϵϯ ϯ͘ϵϯ ϭ͘ϭϬ ZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĞŶƚĞƌ ϰϵϱ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& Ϯ͘ϱϬ Ϯ͘ϱϬ ϳ͘ϴϲ ϱϬй ϯ͘ϵϯ ϯ͘ϵϯ ϵ͘ϴϯ /ĐĞ^ŬĂƚŝŶŐZŝŶŬ ϰϲϱ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϭ͘ϯϯ ϭ͘ϯϯ ϳ͘ϴϲ ϱϬй ϯ͘ϵϯ ϯ͘ϵϯ ϱ͘Ϯϯ DŝŶŝĂƚƵƌĞ'ŽůĨŽƵƌƐĞ ϰϯϭ ,ŽůĞƐ Ϭ͘ϯϯ Ϭ͘ϯϯ ϳ͘ϴϲ ϱϬй ϯ͘ϵϯ ϯ͘ϵϯ ϭ͘ϯϬ DƵůƚŝƉůĞdžDŽǀŝĞdŚĞĂƚĞƌ ϰϰϱ DŽǀŝĞ^ĐƌĞĞŶƐ ϭϯ͘ϵϲ ϭϯ͘ϵϲ ϭϱ͘ϳϳ ϱϬй ϳ͘ϴϴ ϲ͘ϬϬ ϴϯ͘ϳϲ ZĂĐƋƵĞƚͬdĞŶŶŝƐůƵď ϰϵϭ dĞŶŶŝƐŽƵƌƚ ϯ͘ϴϮ ϯ͘ϴϮ ϳ͘ϴϲ ϱϬй ϯ͘ϵϯ ϯ͘ϵϯ ϭϱ͘Ϭϭ /E^d/dhd/KE> ŚƵƌĐŚ ϱϲϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& Ϭ͘ϰϵ Ϭ͘ϰϵ ϴ͘ϯϭ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϭϱ ϰ͘ϭϱ Ϯ͘Ϭϯ ĂLJĂƌĞĞŶƚĞƌ ϱϲϱ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϭϭ͘ϭϮ ϰϰй  ϲ͘Ϯϯ ϯ͘ϰϵ ϱϬй ϭ͘ϳϰ ϭ͘ϳϰ ϭϬ͘ϴϰ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ^ĐŚŽŽů ϱϮϬ ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ Ϭ͘ϭϲ Ϭ͘ϭϲ ϯ͘ϰϵ ϱϬй ϭ͘ϳϰ ϭ͘ϳϰ Ϭ͘Ϯϴ DŝĚĚůĞ^ĐŚŽŽůͬ:ƵŶŝŽƌ,ŝŐŚ^ĐŚŽŽů ϱϮϮ ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ Ϭ͘ϭϱ Ϭ͘ϭϱ ϯ͘ϰϵ ϱϬй ϭ͘ϳϰϭ͘ϳϰϬ͘Ϯϲ ,ŝŐŚ^ĐŚŽŽů ϱϯϬ ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ Ϭ͘ϭϰ Ϭ͘ϭϰ ϯ͘ϰϵ ϱϬй ϭ͘ϳϰ ϭ͘ϳϰ Ϭ͘Ϯϰ :ƵŶŝŽƌͬŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽůůĞŐĞ ϱϰϬ ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ Ϭ͘ϭϭ Ϭ͘ϭϭ ϭϬ͘ϰϰ ϱϬй ϱ͘ϮϮ ϱ͘ϮϮ Ϭ͘ϱϳ hŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJͬŽůůĞŐĞ ϱϱϬ ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ Ϭ͘ϭϱ Ϭ͘ϭϱ ϭϬ͘ϰϰ ϱϬй ϱ͘ϮϮ ϱ͘ϮϮ Ϭ͘ϳϴ D/> ůŝŶŝĐ ϲϯϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϯ͘ϲϵ ϯ͘ϲϵ ϵ͘ϴϱ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϮ ϰ͘ϵϮ ϭϴ͘ϭϱ ,ŽƐƉŝƚĂů ϲϭϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& Ϭ͘ϴϲ Ϭ͘ϴϲ ϵ͘ϴϱ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϮ ϰ͘ϵϮ ϰ͘Ϯϯ EƵƌƐŝŶŐ,ŽŵĞ ϲϮϬ ĞĚƐ Ϭ͘ϭϰ Ϭ͘ϭϰ ϵ͘ϴϱ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϮ ϰ͘ϵϮ Ϭ͘ϲϵ ŶŝŵĂů,ŽƐƉŝƚĂůͬsĞƚĞƌŝŶĂƌLJůŝŶĐ ϲϰϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϯ͘ϱϯ ϯϬй  Ϯ͘ϰϳ ϵ͘ϴϱ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϮ ϰ͘ϵϮ ϭϮ͘ϭϱ K&&/ ŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞ,ĞĂĚƋƵĂƌƚĞƌƐƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ϳϭϰ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϭ͘ϯϬ ϭ͘ϯϬ ϭϰ͘ϲϱ ϱϬй ϳ͘ϯϮ ϲ͘ϬϬ ϳ͘ϴϬ 'ĞŶĞƌĂůKĨĨŝĐĞƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ϳϭϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϭ͘ϰϰ ϭ͘ϰϰ ϭϰ͘ϲϱ ϱϬй ϳ͘ϯϮ ϲ͘ϬϬ ϴ͘ϲϰ DĞĚŝĐĂůͲĞŶƚĂůKĨĨŝĐĞƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ϳϮϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϯ͘ϵϯ ϯ͘ϵϯ ϵ͘ϴϱ ϱϬй ϰ͘ϵϮ ϰ͘ϵϮ ϭϵ͘ϯϰ ^ŝŶŐůĞdĞŶĂŶƚKĨĨŝĐĞƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ϳϭϱ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϭ͘ϳϲ ϭ͘ϳϲ ϭϰ͘ϲϱ ϱϬй ϳ͘ϯϮ ϲ͘ϬϬ ϭϬ͘ϱϲ KĨĨŝĐĞWĂƌŬ ϳϱϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϭ͘ϯϬ ϭ͘ϯϬ ϭϰ͘ϲϱ ϱϬй ϳ͘ϯϮ ϲ͘ϬϬ ϳ͘ϴϬ KDDZ/> ƵƚŽŵŽďŝůĞZĞůĂƚĞĚ ƵƚŽŵŽďŝůĞĂƌĞĞŶƚĞƌ ϵϰϮ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϯ͘ϭϭ ϰϬй  ϭ͘ϴϳ ϰ͘ϰϱ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϮϮ Ϯ͘ϮϮϰ͘ϭϱ ƵƚŽŵŽďŝůĞWĂƌƚƐ^ĂůĞƐ ϴϰϯ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϰ͘ϵϬ ϰϯй  Ϯ͘ϳϵ ϰ͘ϰϱ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϮϮ Ϯ͘ϮϮϲ͘ϭϵ 'ĂƐŽůŝŶĞͬ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶ ϵϰϰ sĞŚŝĐůĞ&ƵĞůŝŶŐWŽƐŝƚŝŽŶ ϭϯ͘ϵϭ ϰϮй  ϴ͘Ϭϳ ϭ͘ϮϬ ϱϬй Ϭ͘ϲϬ Ϭ͘ϲϬ ϰ͘ϴϰ 'ĂƐŽůŝŶĞͬ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶǁͬŽŶǀDĂƌŬĞƚ ϵϰϱ sĞŚŝĐůĞ&ƵĞůŝŶŐWŽƐŝƚŝŽŶ ϭϴ͘ϰϮ ϱϲй  ϴ͘ϭϬ ϭ͘ϮϬ ϱϬй Ϭ͘ϲϬ Ϭ͘ϲϬ ϰ͘ϴϲ EĞǁĂƌ^ĂůĞƐ ϴϰϭ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& Ϯ͘ϰϮ ϮϬй  ϭ͘ϵϰ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϱ͘ϰϯ YƵŝĐŬ>ƵďƌŝĐĂƚŝŽŶsĞŚŝĐůĞ^ŚŽƉ ϵϰϭ ^ĞƌǀŝĐŝŶŐWŽƐŝƚŝŽŶƐ ϰ͘ϴϱ ϰϬй  Ϯ͘ϵϭ ϰ͘ϰϱ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϮϮ Ϯ͘ϮϮ ϲ͘ϰϲ ^ĞůĨͲ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƌtĂƐŚ ϵϰϳ tĂƐŚ^ƚĂůůƐ ϱ͘ϱϰ ϰϬй  ϯ͘ϯϮ ϭ͘ϮϬ ϱϬй Ϭ͘ϲϬ Ϭ͘ϲϬ ϭ͘ϵϵ dŝƌĞ^ƚŽƌĞ ϴϰϴ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϯ͘ϳϱ Ϯϴй  Ϯ͘ϳϬ ϰ͘ϰϱ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϮϮ Ϯ͘ϮϮ ϱ͘ϵϵ ŝŶŝŶŐ &ĂƐƚ&ŽŽĚZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚǁŝƚŚƌŝǀĞͲdŚƌƵtŝŶĚŽǁ ϵϯϰ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϯϯ͘Ϭϯ ϱϬй  ϭϲ͘ϱϮ ϱ͘ϲϰ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϮ Ϯ͘ϴϮ ϰϲ͘ϱϵ &ĂƐƚ&ŽŽĚZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚǁŝƚŚŽƵƚƌŝǀĞͲdŚƌƵtŝŶĚŽǁ ϵϯϯ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϯϯ͘Ϯϭ ϱϬй  ϭϲ͘ϲϭ ϱ͘ϲϰ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϮ Ϯ͘ϴϮ ϰϲ͘ϴϰ ,ŝŐŚdƵƌŶŽǀĞƌ;^ŝƚͲŽǁŶͿZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ ϵϯϮ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϵ͘Ϭϱ ϰϯй  ϱ͘ϭϲ ϱ͘ϲϰ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϮ Ϯ͘ϴϮ ϭϰ͘ϱϱ YƵĂůŝƚLJZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ ϵϯϭ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϳ͘ϴϬ ϰϰй  ϰ͘ϯϳ ϱ͘ϲϰ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϮ Ϯ͘ϴϮ ϭϮ͘ϯϮ ŽĨĨĞĞͬŽŶƵƚ^ŚŽƉǁŝƚŚƌŝǀĞͲdŚƌƵtŝŶĚŽǁ ϵϯϳ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϯϴ͘ϵϵ ϳϬй  ϭϭ͘ϳ ϱ͘ϲϰ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϮ Ϯ͘ϴϮ ϯϮ͘ϵϵ KƚŚĞƌZĞƚĂŝů &ƌĞĞͲ^ƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŝƐĐŽƵŶƚ^ƚŽƌĞ ϴϭϱ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϰ͘ϴϯ ϯϬй  ϯ͘ϯϴ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϵ͘ϰϲ EƵƌƐĞƌLJ;'ĂƌĚĞŶĞŶƚĞƌͿ ϴϭϳ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϲ͘ϵϰ ϯϬй  ϰ͘ϴϲ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϭϯ͘ϲϭ ,ŽŵĞ/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚ^ƵƉĞƌƐƚŽƌĞ ϴϲϮ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& Ϯ͘ϯϯ ϰϴй  ϭ͘Ϯϭ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϯ͘ϯϵ WŚĂƌŵĂĐLJͬƌƵŐƐƚŽƌĞǁͬŽƌŝǀĞͲdŚƌƵtŝŶĚŽǁ ϴϴϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϴ͘ϱϭ ϱϯй  ϰ͘ϬϬ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϭϭ͘ϮϬ WŚĂƌŵĂĐLJͬƌƵŐƐƚŽƌĞǁͬƌŝǀĞͲdŚƌƵtŝŶĚŽǁ ϴϴϭ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϭϬ͘Ϯϵ ϰϵй  ϱ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϭϰ͘ϳϬ ^ŚŽƉƉŝŶŐĞŶƚĞƌ;хϭϱϬŬͿ ϴϮϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϯ͘ϰϬ ϯϰй  Ϯ͘Ϯϰ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϲ͘Ϯϳ ^ŚŽƉƉŝŶŐWůĂnjĂ;ϰϬͲϭϱϬŬͿ ϴϮϭ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϱ͘ϭϵ ϯϰй  ϯ͘ϰϯ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϵ͘ϲϬ ^ƚƌŝƉZĞƚĂŝůWůĂnjĂ;фϰϬŬͿ ϴϮϮ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϲ͘ϱϵ ϯϰй  ϰ͘ϯϱ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϭϮ͘ϭϴ ^ƵƉĞƌŵĂƌŬĞƚ ϴϱϬ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϵ͘Ϯϰ ϯϲй  ϱ͘ϵϭ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϭϲ͘ϱϱ dŽLJͬŚŝůĚƌĞŶΖƐ^ƵƉĞƌƐƚŽƌĞ ϴϲϰ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϱ͘ϬϬ ϯϬй  ϯ͘ϱϬ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϵ͘ϴϬ ĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ^ƚŽƌĞ ϴϳϱ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϭ͘ϵϱ ϯϬй  ϭ͘ϯϳ ϱ͘ϲϬ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ͘ϴϬ ϯ͘ϴϰ ^Zs/^ tĂůŬͲ/ŶĂŶŬ ϵϭϭ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϭϮ͘ϭϯ ϰϬй  ϳ͘Ϯϴ ϰ͘ϰϱ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϮϮ Ϯ͘ϮϮ ϭϲ͘ϭϲ ƌŝǀĞͲ/ŶĂŶŬ ϵϭϮ ƌŝǀĞͲŝŶ>ĂŶĞƐ Ϯϳ͘Ϭϳ ϰϳй  ϭϰ͘ϯϱ ϰ͘ϰϱ ϱϬй Ϯ͘ϮϮ Ϯ͘ϮϮ ϯϭ͘ϴϲ ,Ăŝƌ^ĂůŽŶ ϵϭϴ ϭ͕ϬϬϬ^&'& ϭ͘ϰϱ ϯϬй  ϭ͘ϬϮ ϲ͘ϰϭ ϱϬй ϯ͘ϮϬ ϯ͘ϮϬ ϯ͘Ϯϲ <ĞLJƚŽ^ŽƵƌĐĞƐŽĨWĂƐƐͲďLJZĂƚĞƐ͗ ͗/ddƌŝƉ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ,ĂŶĚŬϯƌĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ;^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌϮϬϭϳͿ ͗ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚďLJ<ŝŵůĞLJͲ,ŽƌŶďĂƐĞĚŽŶ/dƌĂƚĞƐĨŽƌƐŝŵŝůĂƌĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ ͗/dƌĂƚĞĂĚũƵƐƚĞĚƵƉǁĂƌĚďLJ<,ďĂƐĞĚŽŶůŽŐŝĐĂůƌĞůĂƚŝŽŶƐŚŝƉƚŽŽƚŚĞƌĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ džŚŝďŝƚͲ>ĂŶĚhƐĞƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶĐLJdĂďůĞ