Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-07-1988 r _ T ~ s f ,.r N t A';ENUA CI1Y OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL \ June 7, 1968 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 7, 1966, at 5:30 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall at which the following items will be considered: r Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular Meeting. 5:30 p.m. 1. Hold a discussion of an ordinance amending Articles 4.01 through and including Article 4.06 of Chapter IV of Article III of Appendix A (Denton Development Code) i of the Code of ordinances to provide for new and amended regulations and requirements for streets, driveways, parking lots, and sidewalks; and repealing Articles 4.17 and 4.16 of Appendix A. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Holy a discussion regarding a proposed landscaping/tree preservation ordinance. 3. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art, 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Hold a discussion regarding the Cit of Denton vs. Maverick, Hawley vs. the Gi 9 Denton, Rankin vs. the c o enton, and Ana rson vs, the City o Denton. y b. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(fArt. 6252-17 C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Joint Work Session with the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Public Utilities Board and the Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 7, 1966, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall at which the following item will be considered: 6:00 P.M. i. Hold a discussion regarding the recommended Five Year Capital Improvemen, Plan. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 7, 1966, at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at which the following items will be considered: i I City of Denton City Council Agenda June 7, 1966 Page 2 7:00 p.m, l Consider approval of the minutes of the regular i Mayt108 1966, the regul~ar the special May117,m196Fj and f of May 3, the work session of May 24, 1988. 2. Public Hearings A. Consider a petition of Burger Street, Inc. f requesting approval of a detailed plan and planned development (PD) district for 0.244 acres. Tract consists of 0.071 acres and is currently zoned commercial (C); Tract B consists of U.223 acres and is currently zoned planned development (PD-6). The property is located approximately 13U feet northwest of the intersection of Loop 268 and I-35E service road and is shown in the John W. 61cGowan Survey, Abstract No. 797. If the detailed plan and planned development district are approved, the property may be used for a restaurant, Z-1655. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a detailed plan and planned development (PD) district for 0,294 acres located approximat,~ly 130 feet northwest of the intersection of Loop 266 and I-35E service road. B. Consider a petition of City of Denton requesting establishment of the Agricultural (A) zoning district on 51.3C65 acres along the Elm Fork of the Trinity River. The property is located in the J. Clayton Survey, Abstract 221; J. Lamar survey, Abstract 754; and M. McBride Survey, Abstract 804. If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose allowed in the Agricultural (A) zoning district, Z-86-001. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval,) 1. Adoption of an ordinance establishingg the Agricultural (A) zoning district on S1.3085 acres along the Elm Fork of the Trinity River. 1 I fr I 4 f City of Denton City Council Agenda June 7, 1985 Page 3 C. Consider a petition of Duininck Brothers, Inc. requesting a Specific Use Permit for a temporary batch plant and construction site in an Agricultural (A) district. The property is approximately 15.234 acres located at the northwest corner of Rector Road dnd I-3S North service road and is described 3s part of the B. Burleson Survey, Abstract No. 65, and the J. I Ayers Survey, Abstract No. 2. Z-68-007. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) I 1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a Specific Use Permit for a temporary batch plant and construction site on approximately 15.234 acres located at the northwest corner of Rector Road and I-35 North service road. 1. D. Consider a petition of BM •J Properties requesting ` a variance of Article 4.04 of the City of Denton ` Subdivision and Land Development Regulations on P 1.997 acre tract located between West hickory Street and Stella Street at Avenue F. This property is further described as a tract in the Eugene Puchalski Survey, Abstract 996, Article 4.04 requires that developers install sidewalks on one side of all thoroughfares and collector streets adjoining a subdivision. A sidewalk is required along the south side of Hickory Street. V-43, (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends denial,) 3, Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended by the Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. Listed below are bids and purchase orders to be approved for payment under the Ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back-up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda items 4.A). This listing Is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss any item prior to approval of the ordinance, A. Bids and Purchase Urders: 1. Bid 49b65 - Two Man Aerial Device C t City of Denton City Council Agenda June 7, 19bb Page 4 B. Tax Refund 1. Consider approval of a tax refund for Elwood Reber - X599.58 C, Plats and Replats 1. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the j Arby's Addition, Lot 1, Block A. (The I Planning and Zoning commission recommends I approval.) 2. Consider approval of preliminary and final replat of Lots 10 and 11 to Lot 11R, Block H, of the F'arrestridge Addition, Commission III. (The Planning and Zoning recommends approval.) 4. Ordinances A, Consider adoption of an ordinance awa Ling competitive bids and providing the r of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. chapter 17 of nthe Codeanof Ora finances B Article r I of adoption of Denton, Texas ("Plumbing Code") by of the City amending Section 17-2 (a)(16) of Chapter 17; repealing all and penalty not ctoEexceede$210O0,00 providing for a (The Plumbing and Mechanical Board recommends approval) C. Consider adoption of Solicitor Itending Article III (Peddlers, Venders) of Chapter 20 of the Coe ulation of Ordinances providing for the reg o home solicitations and itinerant merchants. nt D. Consider executenAmof an endmentdNo. I toutheragreemethe of July 16, 19bS between the City and Freese and Nichols relating to professional engineering services for u(The de of PublicthUtilities Board treatment plan recommends approval). 4 1 {iS E■A 1 1 I City of Denton City Council Agenda June 7, 1988 Page S E. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending schedules TR, TP, and TG of the schedule of rates for electrical service, as adopted by Ordinance No, 87-0279 to provide for a change in peak periods for energy charges. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval) F. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the ` execution of a contract between the City of f Denton and the United States Army corps of Engineers for design and construction of non-cost sharable recreation facilities at Ray Roberts + Lake. (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval) G. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a contract providing for the purchase of real p' property by the City of Denton, Texas as described herein from Mr, and Mrs. Coulter for the acquisition of property at the Lake Ray Roberts Dam. (The Planning and Zoning Commission ' and the Public Utilities Board recommend approval). H. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract providing for the purchase of real property by the City of Denton, Texas located adjacent to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. (The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Public Utilities Board recommend approval). 1. Consider adoption of an ordinance providing for one-way traffic northbound on the east frontage road of Interstate Highway 35E0 from its intersection with Mayhill Road t, the southern City limits, a distance of approximately 5,510 feet; and one-way traffic southbound on the west frontage road of Interstate 35E from its intersection with State School Road to the southern City limits for a distance of 5,540 feet. S, Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution endorsing the outline of legislative strategy for the clean Air Act as adopted by the North Central Texas Council of Governments, B, Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit an application to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for a grant for a rental tehabilitation project. I iy r City of Denton City Council Agenda June 7, 1988 Page 6 C. Consider approval of a resolution appointing members to the Low/Moderate Income Housing Task Force. D. Consider approval of a resolution appointing h members to the Blue Ribbon 1'ask Force for Solid Waste. E. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily closing Park Lane on June 11, 1966 for a block party. I F. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily closing the 135E service road from Avenue E to Bonnie Brae excluding the exit ramp prior to Bonnie Brae on July 4, 1986 for the Kiwanis fireworks display. 6. Tabled Items A. An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas amending Article 30 ("Specific Use Permits") of Appendix B-Zoning by repealing the time limit for which construction must begin. B. Consider remo%al from the table a resolution authorizing the City to submit to the Department of Housing and Urban Development a Final Statement of objectives and Projected Use of Funds. 1. Consider approval of a resolution by the City of Denton, Texas authorizing the City Manager to sign and submit to the Department of Housing and Urban Development a Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds with appropriate certification, as authorized and required by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. as amended. (The Commu ity Development Block Grant Committee recommends approval) 7. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager 8. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. keal Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments a City of Uenton City Council Agenda June 7, 19bb Page 7 9. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 10. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 62'12-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C E R T 1 t I C A T E 1 certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin boar at the Cit Hall of the City of~Denton, Texas, on the day of GL' 198b at o'clock i (a.m.} (lip E A 292bC I IAGLNDA C17Y OF ULN10N CITY COUNCIL June 7, 1966 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 7, 196b, at 5:30 p.m. in tile, civil Defense Room of City (fall at whi^h the following items will be considered: Note: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the I Regular Meeting. 5:30 P.M. 1. hold a discussion of an ordinance amending Articles 4.01 through and including Article 4.06 of Chapter IV 1 A Article III of Appendix' A (Denton Development Code) I of the Code of Ordinances to provide for new and amended regulations and requirements for streets, driveways, parking lots, and sidewalks; and repealing Articles 4.17 and 4.16 of Appendix A. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Hold a discussion regarding a proposed landscaping/tree preservation ordinance. 3. Exec,tivc Sessior: A. Legol Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Hold a discussion regarding the City of Denton vs. Maverick, Hawle vs, the C ty, c vst the It o e-L nton, and K.~Uur50n vs. 1110 C !y o enton. b. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(fArt. 6252-17 V.A.1,S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Joint Work Session with the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Public Utilities Board and the Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 7, 19660 at 6:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of City hall at which the following item will be considered: 6:00 P.M. 1. Hold a discussion regarding the recommended five Year Capital Improvement Plan, Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, June 7, 1966, at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chambers of City hall at which the following Items will be considered: Now A S~ L 1 I City of Uenton City Council Agenda # June 7, 1966 Page 2 7;00 p,m. 1. Consider approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of May 3, 1966 the special called meeting of May 10, 1966, the regular meeting of May 170 1966, and the work session of May 14, 1968. k 2. Public Hearings A. Consider a petition of Burger Strect, Inc. requesting approval of a detailed plan and planned development (PD) district for U.294 i acres. Tract A consists of 0,071 acres and is currently zoned commercial (C); Tract B consists of U.223 acres and is currently zoned planned development (PD-6). The property is located approximately 13U feet northwest of tr.l Intersection of Loop 266 and 1-35E service road and is shown in the John W. McGowan Survey, Abstract No. 797. If the detailed plan and planned development district are approved, the property may be used for a restaurant. Z-1655. (I lie Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an ordinance approving a detailed plan and planned development (PD) district for 0,294 acres located approximately 130 feet northwest of the intersection of Loop 266 and I-3SE service road. B. Consider a petition of City of Denton requesting establishment of the Agricultural (A) zoning district on 51.3065 acres along the Elm Fork of the Trinity River. the property is located in the J. Clayton Survey, Abstract 221; J. Lamar Survey, Abstract 754; and M, McBride Survey, Abstract 604, If approved, the propert;.- may be utilized for any purpose allowed in the Agrlculturai (A) zoning district, Z-6C-901. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 1. Adoption of an ordinance establishing the Agricultural (A) zoolug district on 51.3065 acres along the Elm Pork of the Trinity River. i ~t f V J"i unte7y of Denton City Council Agenda , 19bb !'age 3 i• Consider a Petition of Duininck requesting a Specific Use Permit foroahers, Inc. t F baIch plant and construction temporary Agricultural (A) district, site in an approximately 15,234 the property is northwest corner acres located at the service road and rf Rector Road anu 1-35 North described Burleson Survey, Abstract No. as6S0 part O and f thiee J. Ayers Survey, Abstract No, 2 Planning and Zonin Z-68- 007. g approval.) R Commission r reec commends ~f 1, Adoptiun of an f Specific Use Permit orfornaa e Ce poraryinbatch plant and construction site on approximately 15.234 acres located at the northwest corner of Rector Road and I-3S Nort'n service road, D, Consider a Petition of BM-J Properties requesting a variance of Article 4,04 of the City of Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations n a 1,:-97 acre tract located between West hickory Street and Stella Street at Avenue F. property is further described as a tract in rthe 4 u04n requirhessktihatu devetlopersra install, Article sidew on one side of al'. thoroughfares and collector alks streets adjoining i subdivision, A sidewalk is required along the south side of Hickory Street. 4-43, (lhe planning and Zoning Commission recommends dentfl,) 3, Consent A,Qer.da Each of these items is recommended by the staff and approval thereof will be strictly on te basi of the recommendations. Approval of the Consentl Agendas authorizes the Litt Manager or his designee to Implement accordance with the Staff recommendations, each item in Listed below are bids and approved for payment under the purchase orders to be agenda. Detailed back-upi Ordinance section to the Information is attached the ordinances (Agenda items 4,A), ti ` Consent Agenda to allow Councilhis l is ng i provided on the Members to discuss an f` prior to approval of the ordinance, y item A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1, Bid #9665 Iwo Man Aerial Device i f i. i City of Denton City Council Agenda June 7, 1'0'8b Page 4 B. Tax Refuni 1, Consider approval of a tax refund for Elwood Reber - $595,56 i 1 C. Plats and keplats 1. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the t Arby's Addition, Lot 1, Block A. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 2. Consider approval of preliminary and final ' replat of lots 10 and 11 to Lot 11R, Block H, of the Forrestridge Addition, Section III. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval.) 4. Ordinances A. Consider Edoption of an ordinance accepting competitive, bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. B. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending Article 1 of Chapter 17 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas ("Plumbing Code") by amending Section 17-2 (a)(16) of Chapter 17; repealing all ordi,jances in conflict herewith and Providing for a penalty not to exceed $2,000,00, (The Plumbing and Mechanicml Board recommends approval) C, Consider ac')ption of an ordinance amending Article III (Peddlers, Solicitors and Itinerant Venders) of Chapter 20 of the Code of Ordinances providing for the regulation of home solicitations and itinerant merchants. U. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 to the agreement of July 16, 196S between the City and I'reese and Nichols relating to professional engineering services for the upgrade of the City's water treatment plant, (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval), 1 p . f I City of Denton City Council Agenda Jone 7, 198b Page S E. Consider adoption of an ordinance amending schedules 7k, TP, and TG of the schedule of sates for electrical service, as adopted by Ordinance ! No, b7-027, to provide for a change in peak pericis for energy charges, (The Public Utilities Board recommends approval) t M N, Consider adoption of an o finance authorizing the execution of a contract between the City of Denton and the United States Army Corps of Engineers for design and construction of non-cost sharable recreation facilities at Ray Roberts Lake. (The Public Utilities Board recommends appruval) G. Consider adoption of an ordinance approving a contract providing for the purchase of real property by the City of Denton, 7exxs as described herein from Mr, and Mrs, Coulter for the acquisition of property at the Lake Ray Poberts Dam. (The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Public Utilities Board recommend approval), H. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the, City Manager to execute a contract providing for the purchase of real property by the City of Denton, lexts 1•1cated adjacent to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Me Planning and Zoninp Commission and the Public Utilities Doard recommend approval). I. Consider adoption of an ordinance providin for one-way traffic northbound on the east frontage road of Interstate Highway 35 E, from its intersection wiih Mayhlll Road to the southern City limits, a distance of approximately S,570 feet; and one-way traffic southbound on the west frontage road of Interstate 35L from its intersection with State School Roau to the southern City limits for a distance of 5,540 feet. 51 Resolutions A. Consider approval of a resolution endor;Ing the o+itline of legislative strategy for the Clean Air Act as adopted by the North Central Texas Council of Governments. B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the Clty Manager to submit an application to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for a grant for a rental rehabilitation project. I T ~ 1 FF A, yes a City of Denton City Council Agenda June 7, 1986 Page 6 C. Consider approval of a resolution appointing members to the Low/Moderate Income Housing Task Force. D. Consider approval of a resolution appointing members to the Blue Ribbon Task Force for Solid Waste. E. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily closing Park Lane on June 11, 1966 for a block. party. F. Consider approval of a resolution temporarily C closing the 135E service road from Avenue E to Bonnie Brae excluding the exit ramp prior to Bonnie Brae on July 4, 1966 fc' the &iwanis fireworks display. 6. Tabled Items A. ordinance of the City Council of the City of ton, Texas amenuing Article 10 ("Specific Use Permits") of Appendix B-Zoning by repealing the time limit for which construction must begin. B. Consider removal from the table a resolution authorizing the City co submit to the Department of Housing and Urban Development a Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. 1. Consider approval of a resolution by the City of Denton, Texas authorizing the City Manager to sign and submit to the Department of Housing and Urban Development a Final i Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds with appropriate certification, as authorized and required by the Housing and Cummunity Development Act of 1974. as amended. (The Community Development Block Grant Committee recommends approval) 7. Mlsc,~,llaneous matters from the City Manager b. Official Action on Executive Session Items: A. Legal Matters B. Real Estate C. Petso:lIleI D. Board Appointments } City of Denton City Council Agenda June 7, 1966 Page 7 9. New Business: This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas. 10. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), r.rt 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1 C h R T I P I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1966 at o'clock (a.m.) p.m. C SECREMY 29260 r V • 6 1 i1 1( 14{r` I . 1 _ J i E• / pAT E ;06/07/88 Cl'l9 COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: OF CHAPTERCIVAOFNARTICLtiTIIIEOF4APFENp1xUAH(DAND ENT'ONCDEVELOPMENTCCODE)p~ E RECOMM~TIONt { The Planning and Zoning Commission recommenced approval at its `f April 13, 1988 meeting by a vote of 4-1. Staff recommends revisions to Article 4.U5 (H) Parking Lots, as noted in the attachment; with regard to the use of pavers, patterned concrete, and grid type pavers. also collector section in Articlec4~.05 n W as the access to f SUMM_ARYt At the May 24th study session, the City Council requested that staff pre- pare additional material on Collector Street Access (page 22 of proposed regulations). staff. The proposed Based on the languagecand/or crevision ftorlaoptions nguage isrprovided ein the attachment. Option 12, which proposes revised language to clarify that access would be permitted but when possible residential subdivisions should be designeo so that lots do not require driveway access to existing and pro- posed collectors, is recommended by the staff, An example of where this option has already been implemented is Hercules Lane between Sherman Drive and Locust Street. Royal Acres Addition has been designed so that resl- dential/local streets tie to hercules Lane ano the residences have access to residential/local streets instead of the collector street. In regard to use of pavers, patterned concrete and grid type paving, staff recommends adding language to Article 4.05 (HWhandtre isinterleendixy5, The proposed language is attached to clarity hse used in parking lots. BACKGROUND: City Council discussed the regulations at two study sessions held on May 10 and May 240 1988. Staff has :ncorporateJ comments from the Council into the regulations. PRA, ARTMENTS GR GRUUPS AFFECTED: Staff involved in the development process, Planning and Zoning Commission, developers, and citizens. I I ' City Council Report Format I June 7, 1988 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Denton currently participates in perimeter street paving by ` paying for seven (7) feet of paving, and the developer pays for seventeen fl E (17) feet of paving. The development generates the need for two-way traf- fic) therefore, the regulations, as proposed, require the developer to construct the street without City participation. A long range fiscal impact comes from the requirement in the regulations for better on-site f traffic management, i.e., in parking lots. Ultimately, this will reduce I!f congestion at driveways and entrances and, therefore, delay the need for expansion of roadways. Respe itm Prepared by: Lloyd Harrell City Manager a Cecile Carson Urban Planner Ap oveds c~v rank 8 Robb i6s Executive Director for Planning ano DeveloFment V r k ATTAChMENT 1 1 SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS PAVERS i i i Article 4.05 (H) Parking Lots (11) All parking lots shall bt constructed in accordance with the. specificatio -.s of Appendix A-S and the applicable provisions of the City's N.T.G. standard specifications, All parking lots shall it be surfaced with concrete or asphalt, except that pavers may be used as a surface material in lieu of concrete or asphalt if they meet the minimum load limits for the type and amount of vehicular traffic proposed to make use of the parking lot, in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Parking lot surfaces shall be properly maintained in good condition so as to be free of potholes or other defects ana so that all parking space lines or other markings are kept visible and distinct. - r, I 1 i 1 ~J f APPENDIX A-5 PARKING LOT SURFACE (MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS) Minimum Pavement Thickness and Subgrade I *Concrete I Asphalt i **Pavers^ I I Exiating unpaved 15 inches with ! 2 inches with I N/A Parking Lot I compacted base 1 6 inches flex tease I ! I I t New Parking Lots I l I I I Fire and Drive 15 inches with l 5 inches with 16 inches lime Lanes 16 inch lime subgradei 6 inch lime subgrade I subgrade for I I solid pavers I ! I _ I I ! Parking Area 1 5 inches with ! 2 inches with 16 inches lime I compacted base 16 inches flex base I subgrade for f I I I solid pavers ! or 6 inches I 1 I flexible base for grid I pavers I I ( I Construction materials and methods are to conform to North Texas Council of Governments standard specifications and City of Denton addendum& to the NTCOG specifications. a Concrete sections are to be reinforced with 3/8 inch bare on 24 inch centers or 6 x 6 number 6 wire mesh. when pavers are used the subgrade and materials shall be according to j Appendix A-5 - Parking Lot Surface (Minimum Requirements for Pavers). A list of approved materials and suppliers can be obtained from the Department of Public Works. 06890/3 i L, I APPENDIX A-5 PARKING LOT SURFACE (MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOA PAVERS) ANITICIPATED TRAFFIC LOADING PAVERS REQUIRED NO. OF VEHICLES TOTAL EQUIVALENT TRAFFIC PER DAY STANDARD AXLE LAYING CLASStF1- OVER 3 T REPETITIONS AFTER CATION GROSS 20 YEARS SCRVICE EXAMPLES OF USAGE THICKNESS PATTERN TI 0.15 0 TO MULTI-DWELLING DRIVEWAYS, 2 3/8" H OR P 45,000 PARKING LOTS, CUL-DE-SACS. 2 3/8" H OR P MALLS NOT ACCEPTING 2 3/8" H DELIVERY VEHICLES. j T2 15.45 45 000 TO MINOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS 2 3/8" H OR P 140,000 SUBJECT TO GARBAGE TRUCKS. 3 1/8" H OR P COMMERCIAL PARKING LOTS. 3 1/8" H T3 45-150 140 000 TO RESIDENTIAL STREETS. 2 3/8" H 450,000 VEHICULARETRAFFIC- ) 1/8" H Tn MI T4 150-450 450 DOD000 UREA AREAS H ROADS4INMPH 3 1/8" H SPEED LIMIT. INDUSTRIAL YARDS WITH TRUCK TRAFFIC ONLY. TS 450.1500 1,440100 OTO URBAN THROUGH ROADS4INMPH 3 1/8" H 77 SPEED LAREAS WITH A imit. INDUSTRIAL YARDS WITH TRUCK TRAFFIC AND LOADING EQUIPMENT.(2) NOTES3 (1) LAYING PATTERN P - HEqRINGOONE (2) NOT HEEL LO LOADING EQUIPMENT MUST (IF-APPLICABLE) 80 70 60 SO 40 30 - 25 20 - I 1Q 7 ' 6 S 4 u TI 12 13 T4 T5 2 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 41 18 19 3 " RECOMMENDED MINIMUM SUB-BASE THICKNESS RECOMMENDED MINIMUM SUB-BASE THICKNESSES 1 F i N i ATTACHMENT 2 SUBDIVISION AND LAND LEVELGPMENT REGULATIONS COLLECTOR STREET ACCESS Option 01. As recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission D. ACCESS TO CGLLLCTOR STREETS. (1) Commercial, industrial, and multi-family properties fronting on collector streets shall be allowed one driveway for each 75 feet of frontage on one street, provided that each driveway would meet the separation and corner i -learance requirements of this article. 4 (2) Residential subdivisions slill be required to } provide a marginal parallel access street, alley, or private parallel access drive to serve the individual lots fronting upon a collector street, in accordance with the access standards applicable to arterial streets. (1) If any lot f r r single family or duplex residential owellings is allowed direct driveway access to a collector street, each lot may be required to share a common driveway. If shared access is not required, no lot shall be allowed more than one driveway. - Results: hould limit access to collectors but is somewhat vague in regard to when alternative access will be required. Option M2: Rewording as Recommended by Staff D. ACCESS TO COLLECTOR STREETS. ) Commercial, industrial, and mti-fail ntingoncollectorstreets shall be alllow d none driveway for each 75 feet of frontage on one street, provided that each .driveway would meet the separation and corner toarticle. wheneverepossi ile,mebesrequi edthis locatedhanddriveway designed shall, to provide joint or shared access with adjoining properties. (1) Single and two-family residential developments shall be designed so that lots do not require driveway access to existing or proposed collector streets, if the shape or size of the property is such that the lots cannot be designed to avoid driveway access to a collector street, adjacent lots shall be provided with a shared access. In no case shall any lot be allowed more than one driveway access to any street. Results: Clarifies the recommendation of the Commission that access should be allowed but limited on collector streets. - w I V Attachment 2 Page 2 Option 0. Revise Section to Allow Single Family and Duplex Direct Access to Collector Streets to Be the Same as for Residential/Local Streets D. ACCLSS TO COLLECTOR STREETS. (1) Commercial, inaustrial, and multi-family properties fronting on collector streets shall be allowed one driveway for each 75 feet of frontage on one streot, provided that each driveway would meet the separation and corner clearance requirements of this article. ` (2) Single family or duplex residential dwellings are alloweo direct driveway access to a collector street but each lot may be required to share a common driveway or drive entrance. If shared access is not required, no lot shall be allowed n,cre than one driveway. i Results: Collector streets would not collect traffic because of direct access interrupting the movement of traffic and does not function efficiently. Option k4. Add Sub-Collector Classification. The definition of sub-collector would be the same as for a collector street but would be designed to handle between 3,CUO and 71000 vehicle trips per day. Access will be permitted to sub-collector as described in Option 03. Access to collector streets would be the same as written. Sub-Collector - A street whose main purpose is to collect and direct tra c from local streets to arterial streets; to carry traffic betwee., arterial streets; or to provide access to abutting commercial or inaustrial properties, or higher intensity residential land uses. It is designed to handle between 3,000 and 7,000 vehicle trips per day. Results: (1') kould require revisions to numerous documents that do not make reference to sub-collectors. hould function basically like a local/residential street. (3) The only significant difference between a collector and a sub-collector would be access, because right-of-way and pavement width would be the same. (d) Difficulty in measuring traffic to determine when this type of road would be applicable. U76bo t r 2222L/42788 i NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ARTICLES 4.01 THROUGH AND INCLUDING ARTICLE 4.06 OF CHAPTER IV OF ARTICLE III OF APPENDIX A (DENTON DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE CODE OF ORDI- NANCES TO PROVIDE FOR NEW AND AMENDED REGULATIONS AND REQUIRE- MENTS FAR STREETS, DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS, AND SIDEWALKS; REPEALING ARTICLES 4.17, 4.18 AND 4.19 OF CHAPTER IV OF ARTICLE III APPENDIX A; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $500.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, has found that revisions of the Denton Development Code are needed to provide for more ' understandable, effective, and efficient land development requirements and regulations; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton has undertaken a scheduled pro- gram to revise and implement the' new and amended land develop- ment regulations and requirements; and WHEREAS, the revised regulations applicable to streets, driveways, parking lots, and sidewalks have been completed; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that immediate implementa- C tion of those regulations would be in the best interest of the community; and WHEREAS, a public hearing oc, the proposed regulations has been hold in accordance with the provisions of the Local Govern- ment Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I, That articles 4.01 through and including article 4.06 0~Z~r IV of Article III of Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances are amended to read as follows: 1 T 1 I ~ 4 F 1 CHAPTER IV REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS DIVISION I. GENERAL PROVISIONS I Article 4.01 Purpose and Intent. ` (A) The following standards and requirements are adopted for the purpose of insuring that all developments provide, at no cost to the City, for the streets, sidewalks, street lights, parking lots, water and sewer facilities, drainagge facilities, and other public and private improvements and facilities which are reason- i ably necessary and adequate to serve the dcvelopment. (B) These requirements are adopted with the intent of requiring each development to provide for those public facilities and improvements to serve the development to the extent that the required facilities and improvements bear a reasonable connection to the need created by the development, and to the degree that the development is benefitted by. Article 4.02 Application and Interpretation of Standards and Regu~ cements, (A) All persons developing property to which this Code applies shall design, construct, install, and provide for the facilities and improvements herein specified in accordance with the standards and requirements or this Code and the City's master plane. (B) The Commission shall have final authority over the inter- pretation and application nn any required improvements or design standards, except as otherwise provided in this Code. These standards and requirements shall be liberally interpreted and applied so as to achieve the purpose and intent of the standard or requirement, where literal application of a requirement in a pafrticular case urequireme t,uthecCommittee may recommend and the Commission may impose a stricter requirement so as to comply with the purpose f and intent of the requirement. any otherh regulations ors requirements of thel U iformmFireiCode, Uniform Building Code, zoning ordinances, flood prevention and control ordinances, or any other ordinances. r PAGE 2 i i I 1 i N I Article 4.03 City Participation in Public Improvements (A) In any case where this Code requires any, development to provide for streets, sidewalks, water or sewer lines, drainage facilities or other public improvements, the City may, at its option, choose to participate in the cost of increasing the size or scope of the improvements otherwise required by the develop- k ment, so as to meet the needs of the general public, (B) Where the City chooses to participate, the developer and City shall enter a written cost participation agreement setting forth the respective duties of the parties. The public improve- ments to be constructed pursuant to the agreement shall be deter- mined by the public bidding procedures required by State law for public projects. Bids shall be solicited so as to obtain the proportionate costa of the developer and City for the work to be performed under the bid to be awarded, in accordance with State law, the City may choose to participate in the cost of public improvements without public bide when the City's cost is thirty percent or less of the total contract price. DIVISION 11. STREET AND SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN STANDARDS Article 4.04 All developments shall provide for streets and sidewalks to serve the development in accordance with the followingg requirements and deEi.gn standards and the City's Master Thotoughfare or Street Plans. (A) STREET CLASSIFICATIONS. For the purpose of determining the street requirements of this Code, all streets shall be classified and defined as follows: (1) Alley; A public or private vehicular access way, es geed for the special accommodation of the property it serves and not intended to be used for general public use. (2) Collector. A street whose main purpose is to co rr' act and direct traffic from local streets to arterial streets; to carry traffic between arterial streets, or to provide access to abutting commercial or industrial properties, or higher intensity residential land uses. It is designed to handle no more than 10,000 vehicle trips par day. PAGE 3 } i i f4 I 4 r i P 3) Cul-de-sac. A street which terminates in a vehicular ( turnaround. (4) Estate Subdivision. A local street, without curb an gutter, w ose sole purpose is to provide direct access to single family lots of one acre or more, each lot having 100 or more feet of atreet frontage. (5) Local/h.sidential. A street whose sole purpose is to prow, de access to abutting single family or two family residential properties. It is designed to serve no more than 5,000 vehicle trips per day. (6) Mar inal Parallel Access. A street which is parallel an a scent to an arterial street. It is designed to provide access to abutting properties so that the properties are sheltered from the effects of the throwgh traffic on the arterial street, or so that the flow of traffic on the arterial street is not impeded by direct driveway access from abuttingg pproperties, When used as a private drive, it11shall be referred to as a "private parallel driveway. (7) Off-site. Any street, other than a perimeter street, which extenda beyond the boundary of the development. (8) Perimeter. That portion of any street, of any c ass cation, abutting the boundary of the development. (9) Prrimsr Arterial. A street, including freeways, wio-1 ae -man purpose is to serve as a major coute into, out of, or across the City or connect one or more of the City's major activity centers. 't'hese streets are shown on the City's thoroughfare plan and are usually located at least one mile apart. (10) 5econdar Arterial. A street whose main purpose is to serve as a ma or route from one area of the City to another, as a connection between one primary arterial to another, or to provide a major route to one or more of the City's moderate activity centers. These streets are shown on the City's thoroughfare plan. (8) VEHICLE TRIPS. Any ret,airement or design standard of this article which is based upon or determined in accordance with a specified number PACE 4 1 i N I C of "vehicle trips", shall be determined by the City Engineer in accordance with the latest edition of the Transportation and EAnineeri__n__ggHandbock, published by the Instituto o ram nspor- tat oon-Engineers. I (C) COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. (1) All required street improvements shall comply with the k "Street Design Specifications", as contained in Appendix A-1. II Right-of-way widths in excess of the Street Design Specifica- tions shall be required whenever, due to topography, additional width is necessary to provide adequate earth slopes. } (2) All required street improvements shall be constructed in accordance with Division II ("Materials") and Division III ("Method") of the City's Standard Specifications for Public Storks Construction North entra exas, as amen de ten ar pet cat one ere any provision of this Coda conflicts with a provision or requirement of the N.T.C. Standard Specifica- tions, the provisions of this Code shall control. (D) STREET CAPACITY. (1) All developments shall provide for those streets, including new streets, the improvement of existing streets, and the associated improvements and rights-of-way, which are necessary to provide adequate capacity to carry the traffic to be generated by the property at full development. "Adequate capacity" shall mean a level of service "C", as defined by the latest edition of the Hi hway a acit Manual as published by the Transportation Research ar o. t e ational Research Council. (2) Any streets required by the provisions of this section shall also include any drainage structures that are part of the street improvements and are necessary to serve the development in accordance with the drainage requirements of this Code. In the case of estate subdivision streets, no underground drainage improvements, other than driveway culverts, shall be required, but adequate barrow ditches with 4:1 side slopes shall be provided. (3) To provide for future street improvements, any develop- ment may elect upon the approval of the Commission, to dedicate more street right-of-way than would otherwise be required for the development, in lieu of constructing the total street system otherwise required of the development by this Code, when; PAGE S i r~ r f (a) The additional right-of-way will be needed for a proposed arterial street, as shown on the City's thoroughfare plan; (b) Omitting the street improvements that would otherwise be required would not substantially impair the safe movement of traffic created by I the development; and r (c) The market value of the additional right-of-way would, as determined by the City Engineer, be equal to or greater than the cost of the street improvements which are to be omitted. (E) PERIMETER STREETS. (1) New Perimeter Streets. Street systems shall be laid out so as to avo t e nee or new perimeter partial streets, i.e. streets that have less than the full required rigght-of-way and pavement width for the class of street. However, if an arterial street is proposed by the master plan on the boundary of the development or the development creates the need for a new perimeter street, the development shall provide the portion of the fn street for which it reasonably creates the need, but in no case shall that portion of the street provided be less than a pavement width of 25 feet. All perimeter streets shall be provided with curb and gutter along the side abutting the devel- opment. If the perimeter street is ultimately proposed to serve as a divided arterial street, and the development is required to install half of the arterial street, then curb and Sutter shall be provided on both sides of the perimeter street so as to provide the curb for the future median of the arterial street. (2) Existing Perimeter Streets. (a) Any development on the perimeter of an unimproved perimeter street shall dedicate the right-of-way and improve or reconstruct the street to the same extent as is required for new perimeter streets, unless the perimeter street has already been partially improved, in which case the development shall dedicate the additional right-of-way and make the additional street improvements necessary to complete the perimeter street to the classification required. For the purpose of this paragraph, an "unim- proved perimeter" street shall mean a perimeter PAGE 6 f B f x 6 street which does not have curb and gutter or which does not substantially comply with the street design specifications or requirements of this Code. (b) Where any development would be required to improve an existing unimproved perimeter street as provided herein, which is designated in the City's master plans as an arterial street, to less than its full width, and the City's approved Capital Improvements Plan proposes improvement of the existing perimeter street to City speci- fications within two years of the date the required improvements are to be undertaken, the development may elect, in lieu of making the required perimeter street improvements, to pay to the City, prior to beginning construction, the total construction cost, excluding engineer- ing and design coat, of the required street improvements. The amount to be paid shall be determined by the City Engineer, based on the actual cost of providing for the improvements, as shown in the most recent public bids for the s the ame or similar tytp►e street improvements. If required money impaid to provements City is within nfiveSedyearfor s the payment, the funds shall be returned to the person making the payment. (c) Any development which is to generate more than 100 vehicle trips per day at full development and which is excepted from making improvements to existing perimeter streets in accordance with City specifications for new streets, as herein- after provided, shall make the improvements and repairs to the existing perimeter street to the same extent as is required for off-site streets, as hereinafter provided. (3) Exce tions to perimeter Street Requirements. The pro- visions o t s sect on requ r ng t e mprovement of existing unimproved perimeter streets to City specifications for new streets shall not apply to: (a) A plat for a single-family residential lot where such lot is not part of a larger genera{ scheme of development or subdivision of land containing more than one residential lot; PAGE 7 i r_ . 1 f~ 9 1 A b (t,) A development that abuts 100 or less feet of an existing perimeter street, where the existing off-site perimeter street on either side of the abutting perimeter street is not improved to City specifications and there are no proposals or plans for improvements to the perimeter street on either side of the abutting perimeter street as evidenced by the City's Capital Improvements Plan or plats approved or pending approval; (c) A development which: i (i) Is not required or does not propose to extend a City of Denton water line to the property to serve the development; and$ (ii) is located more than eight thousand (8,000) feet from an existing City of Denton water line, measured along a straight line from the nearest boundary of the development to the nearest water line; or (d) A state or Federal highway. (4) Oif-site Connecting Streets. Any perimeter street required to be improved to meet c he specifications for new streets shall be connected to existing off-site streets in accordance with the horizontal design specifications shown in Appendix A-2. (S) Desi n Specifications for Perimeter Streets. Perimeter streets shall e built or improved with cur an gutter and the ne,•,i.ssary drainage facilities in accordance with the speci.fica- t: and provisions of this Code applicable to other streets. Ur recommendation of the City Engineer, a required perimeter at at meeting design standards, but without curb and gutter and related underground street storm drainage facilities may be approved whenever: (a) The required perimeter street is for a residen- tial development in a low intensity area, as shown in the City's taster plans; (b) The development is not located in an area where the pattern or intensity of development would create the need for improved urban drainage facilities in the foreseeable future; and (c) There are no existing or proposed improved drainage facilities, as shown by the City's PAGE 8 i I I i H S Capital Improvements Plan or by plats approved j or pending approval, in such proximity to the development that would connect to or receive the f drainage waters from the required street ; drainage improvements. f (F) IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING OFF-SITE STREETS. (1) Any development which is to generate more than 100 4k vehicle trips per day at full development shall improve or repair and r type of safe and connecting paved off-site necessary traffic amount to generated by the development. (2) The off-site street improvements or repairs need not meet the specifications for new streets, but shall include such patching, reconstruction, or the providing of asphalt overlays determined to be necessary by the City Engineer to provide for the safe movement of vehicular traffic generated by the development, pursuant to a "distress" rating performed by the City Engineer in accordance with Appendix A-3. (3) Off-site street improvements shall not be required beyond the nearest intersecting arterial or collector streets. (4) The requirements to improve any existing off-site street 0 all not apply to that portion of a street proposed to be improved to City specifications in the City's appro:ad Capital Improvements Plan within one year of the date the off-site street improvements are required to be made, if the street or portion thereof to which the off-site street improvement requirements as apply does not determined by the a City Engineer distress in rating accordane 0 wior more th Appendix points, A3, (G) ADEVATE STREET ACCESS. All developments shall provide the necessary strew system, on-site and off-site, to insure that there is safe and adequate access to the development and to each lot within the development. No new streets rlocated equirements hi for deach at development, the determining the acce3s be following shall be considered: (1) Access for police, fire, and other emergency vehicles; (2) The condition of existing streets in the area to be used for access; proposed or (3) The existing intersections congestion as a h result may of b the created development; exist PACE 9 4 1 f: F (4) The proposed circulation of traffic from and into pro- posed or existing st.reets; and, EE (5) Any other condition, existing or proposed, that may t affect safe and adequate access. (H) COORDINATION WITH SURROUNDING STREETS, j (1) The street system for each development shall be coordi- nated with existing, proposed, and anticipated streets within and outside the development, and shall be extended outside the devel- opment when necessary, so as to provide for adequate access, the safe and effective movement and circulation of traffic, or for other reasonable traffic considerations. (2) Streets shall be in alignment with existing or proposed streets of adjoining properties, except where the master plan, topoggraphy requirements of traffic circ,slation, or other planning considerations make it desirable to depart from the alignment. Local along the ocentercreate of block the block. (4) The extension of local or collector streets may be denied if it is determined that the extension would provide for an unacceptable use of the street for substantial through traffic. Streets not required to be extended beyond the development, but that are to be connected with proposed or anticipated streets outside the development at a future date, shall be extended to the property line at the point where the connection is expected. Cul-de-sacs shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of this article. (I) INTERSECTIONS. (1) Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as Possible at a ninety (90) degree angle. Curvilinear streets shell be designed so as to approach an intersection at a right angle for at least 100 feet from the intersection. Not more than two streets shall intersect at any one point. (2) Proposed intersections along one side of a street shall coincide with existing or proposed intersections on the opposite side of the street. Where a center line offset (jog) is allowed at an intersection, the distance between center linen of the intersecting streets shall be not lees than 150 feet. PACE 10 r 4 (3) Different streets which connect with the same street shall maincain a distance separation between the intersecting streets in accordance with Appendix A-7. The specified distances shall b6 measured from the nearest right-of-way lines of the two connecting streets, at the point where the two streets connect to the common street. (4) Intersections shell be designed with a flat grade when- ever possible. In hilly or rolling areas, the street approaching an intersection shall be provided with a leveling area, not j exceeding a two percent (2%) grade, for a distance of sixty feet ! (60'), measured from the nearest right-of-way line of the intersecting street. (5) Fnttrsections shall be designed and constructed so that slopes, trees, or other natural or man-made structures do not create a~visual obstruction within any "intersection visibility triangle", as defined by the Code of Ordinances. All right-of- way dedications for other than intersecting local streets shall include the intersection visibility triangle. In the case of intersecting local streets, the City Engineer may allow a reduction of the required dedication of right-of-way below that which would be included in the intersection's visibility triangle, if not needed for maintenance, repair, reconstruction, or traffic safety. 4 (J) MEDIANS. (1) When any development is required to provide more than one-half of any arterial street, a median shall be provided in accordance with the design standards of Appendix A-1. (2) All portions of the median less than eight feet in width shall be installed with a maintenance free surface of concrete or gimilar material approved by the City Engineer, but excluding asphalt. (3) For every 11000 square feet of median area or portion thoreof not required to be a maintenance free surface, a tree with a trunk of three inches or bore in diameter, measured from ground level, shall be installed. The type of trees used shall be from an approved list maintained by the Parks Department. Other portions of the median not required to be a maintenance free surface shall be landscaped or xeriscaped in accordance with pltna approved by the City. PACE 11 1 . ~ r K x F R K (K) CUL-DE-SACS AND DEAD END STREETS. (1) Cul-de-sacs, or loop streets, shall be used whenever necessary to discourage through traffic on residential or local i streets. No cul-de-sacs shall be located except at the end of a street or the intersection of streets. 1 (2) All permanent and temporary dead-end streets on which there is located a building lot that does not have frontage on i any other street shall be developed with cul-de-sacs. The length i of the street on which a cul-de-sac is located shall not be mo-i I than 1,000 feet, measured from the end of the cul-de-sac to ti-, nearest intersecting street. (3) The right-of-way of a cul-de-sac shall have a radius of 60 feet for arterials, and 50 feet for all other streets. The radius of the paved portion of the turnaround, measured from the outer edge of the pavement, shall be 40 feet. All permanent cul-de-e;cs shall be built in accordance with design standards for streets and shall be provided with curbs and gutters. Temporary cul-de-sacs for dead-end streets which ara proposed to be extended shall be in accordance with the specifications of Appendix A-1. They may be constructed of asphalt, or rock material approved by the City Engineer, and shall be located within a dedicated right-of-way. (L) ALLEYS. (1) Alleys may be allowed in residential developments and may be required for developments in nonresidential zoning districts where necessary to provide for adequate access for service vehicles, off-street loading or unloading, access for emergency vehicles, or similar reasons consistent with the intent of these standards. (2) All alleys shall have at least two direct access points to local public streets, each access point terminating onto separate streets. (3) Alleys shall not have access to arterial 6treets. Alleys shall only be allowed to connect to collector str+sets where there is no other reasonable means of access. 1 (4) Alleys shall not be dedicated to the public except where ` such dedication is determined to serve the public interest. (5) Alleys shall conform to the design standards shown in Appendix A-4. PACE 12 1 VI f e 1 (M) PRIVATE ROADS. (1) A development located in a plannedro da whezoning t district may be approved with one or more private (a) The road will have direct access onto a public street; (b) The road is not necessary or planned to serve ` or provide for traffic or drainage outside the f development; andeigned se as to d 3 (c) The road discourage is through tract fic or (d) The road will provide for adequate access, the safe movement of traffic, drainage, and generally serves as an adequate alternative to a public street. I! (2) When the Private road will serve more than one lot, the developer shall submit to the Commission for approval a written tance owner'se association and binding ubl- c declaration, imvements, establishin prior of any p improvements, or similar legal entity which will have: (a) The legal authority to maintain and exercise control over the road; and, (b) within wthe tdevelopment contributions scover n their propor- tionate shares of the cost associated with maintenance of the road. (3) Private roads shall conform to the design specifica- tions set forth in Appendix A-4, unless the road is the sole o the specifications fore public sitreets. shall cas conformtto the ddeevelosigpment (4) Where any parking areas or spaces are to be areas uand sede long or adjacent to the private road, the parking the shall be design atand ed tos pa ki g accsoordanc t at the sparking design tandar applicable plicable .iblic areas and spaces will not interfere with the use of any p' streets. (3) For the purpose of this section, a private road" shall mean any open way used for vehicular traffic, deignot ned dedicated to public use and not part of a piculag lot, provide vehicular access to a development or lot. PAO° 13 1 T -p i~ t!i I L t[ `(if{ Itt (N) STREET NAKZS AND SIGNS. F It (1) Street dames shall be assigned by the developer, subject to Commission approval, by placing the name on the plat. Street; which are to be In alignment with existing streets shall be given Lhe same name. Names shall be sufficiently different in sound k and spelling so s not to cause conflict c: confusion. I (2) Street name signs shall be installed by the developer at all intersections within or abutting the development prior to the acceptance of any street. The name signs shall be constructed, located, and installed in accordance with written specifications on file with the City Engineer. (0) STREET LIGHTING. (1) All developments shall provide for lighting of all streets, sidewalks, and public rights-of-way which am to be used for vehicular or pedestrian traffic so as to insure the safe use thereof. (2) Street lights shall be installed within dedicated ease- ments at all intersections, in cLil-de-Sacs, and along all public streets at intervals of no more than 300 feet. (3) The required street lights shall be installed by the City upon payment of the cost by the developer. No streets sidewalks, or other public rights-of-tray requited to be lighted shall be accepted for public use until the requirements of this section are met. (P) FIRE LANES. All developments shall provide for fire lanes in accordance with Article •V of Chapter 10 of the Coda of Ordinances, as amended. (Q) SIDEWALKS. (1) The following requirements are adopted for the purpcse of insuring that each development provides for the sidewalks or walkways necessary to serve pedestrian traffic to, from, or across the development. (2) All developments shall, within a dedicated right-of-way provide sidewalks along both sides of all streets within the, PAGE 14 1 I f L i t development and along one side of all perimeter streets; except as follows: (a) A development which is excepted from making perimeter street improvements in accordance with article 4.04 (E) (3) (c), shall not be required to install a sidewalk along that perimeter street. (b) A development which is excepted from making perimeter be erwith t toleinst0all(Ea street: (3) (a imporOV~b) nt shells not cordanc sidewalk along that perimeter street unless the perimeter street is a state or federal highway or is designated as a arterial street, on the City's master 4 thoroughfare plan. (3) In lieu of requiring sidewalks as along hen both si pedestrian comprsive streets. the Commission may approve access plan. Such plan should provide adequate ped strian nccess to schools, recreational facilities, parks, fanned employment centers, and connect with existing or planned pedestrian facilities. (4) Sidewalks required by this section shall be placed an constructed A-6, which shall r in lude handicap -ramps specifications at all intersectionsna d to the driveways. provided that oher materials Sidewalks , exc shall luding constructed ea ta+y' of be concrete; by the City Engineer, if: (a) The material and construction utitlode used could provide a sidewalk that is at durable, maintainable, safe, and as aiequate as one made of concrete; and (b) dThe esirable ork more fin keeping with ithomoverall design of the development. (5) Where the developer who would otherwise tc required to improve an existing unimproved perimeter the e t t of Cthity specifications, elects to pay to the o.' •Y cost required improvements as provided for i% article 4.04 (E) (2) (b), the developer may likewise elect to ply to the City the cost the of any aidvfora sidewalk irovements is atot tused. fort that money p ~o rthe e person n mafive king years the improvemnte,the funds shall be returned I PAGE 15 fti I ~ R 14 DIVISION III. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING LOT } REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN STANDARDS 1 f 'r Article 4.05. After the effective date of this article, no ; person shall construct, reconstruct, replace, relocate, alter, enlarge, improve, maintain., perform any work on, or make use of j any parking lot or driveway on any property within the City of 1 Denton for which a permit is required under this Division except in accordance with the requirements of this Division. (A) DEFINITIONS. In this Division III, the following words shall have the following meanings: (1) Department. The Department of Public Works. (2) Driveway. That portion of the parking lot that consists o° a travel lane opening onto a public street. (3) Parkin Aisle- The portion of the parking lot con- sisting or- arses prov ing direct access to parking spaces. (4) Parking Lot. That portion of any lot that is used by vehicles for access, circulation, parking, and loading and unloading. It comprises the travel lanes, parking area aisles, parking spaces, driveways, and loading and unloading areas. (5) Permit. A Parking Lot/Driveway permit as required herein. (6) Travel Lane. That portion of the parking lot which is used for t e c rcu ation of traffic entering, exiting, or trivel- ing through a parking lot, and is not used for parking spaces or parking aisles. (B) PERMIT PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS. be Permit Required. A Pother gthar. Lot/Driveway p opertsed Permit or to shall be used for a single or two-family d+eiling, within the City of Denton, in any of the following cases: PAGE 16 I i I e NW (a) For the construction of a new parking lot or for the improvement, reconstruction, enlarge- cent, relocation, or alteration of any existing 1 parking lot. (b) For the construction of a new driveway or the 1 reconstruction, relocation, or alteration of an existing driveway. (c) For the alteration or rearrangement of parking spaces, travel lanes, stacking lanes, maneuver- ' ing areas, or fire lanes of existing parking I lots. (d) For any application, submitted after the effec- tive date of this article, seeking approval of a plat or replat for property on which there is an existing driveway. (e) For any application, submitted after the effec- tive date of this article, for a Certificate of Occupancy for any use of property on which there is an existing parking lot or driveway which does not comply with the requirements of this Division, if the property has been vacant for a period of more than six (6) months immediately prior to the application. (2) Application. The application for each property for which a permit is required shall be submitted to the Department on a form furnished for that purpose, along with the required fee, if any. If all of the information required for the application is submitted with or shown on any other plans or application required under any other ordinance, including an application for a building permit, a required landscape site plan, or a planned development detailed plan, no separate application for a permit shall be required. The Department may waive, in whole or part, the submission of any information or plans otherwise required if it determines that the nature or scope of the work is suA that the information or plans are not necessary to obtain or determine compliance with this Division. The application for each property for which a permit is required shall: (a) Describe the location of the property for which the permit is requested. (b) Be accompanied by plans and specifications, in the manner and form as specified by the Depart- ment, showing the number and dimensions of the PAGE 17 i i I~ f i f I jCf parking spaces; the location and dimensions of travel lanes, fire lanes, driveways, and stacking areas; and the minimum storage capacity on the lot for any drive-through facilities, if any. (c) For any existing driveways or parking lots which violate a requirement of this Division, show how compliance is to be met (relocation, rearrangement, closing of the driveway, reconstruction, etc.); or if any proposed or existing driveway or parking lot will not be in compliance with a requirement of this Division, give detailed information why com- pliance is not possible or should not be required. In such cases, the City Engineer may require the applicant to submit a traffic study performed in accordance with accepted professional traffic engineering standards, containing information specified by the City Engineer, to show any adverse impact that may result from approval of the permit. (d) For any proposed or existing driveway accessing an arterial or collector street, be accompanied by a site plan, drawn to a scale of at least 1" to 50', showing the following: (i) The proposed land use and the location of existing and proposed structures or buildings. (ii) The general layout of any existing or proposed parking lot for the property, including any parking lots, or portions thereof, located on other properties which are not totally sepa- rated or designed to be used independently. (iii) The dimensions, location, and design of the driveway on the property for which the appli- cation is made. (iv) All significant traffic features of the street accessed or to be accessed by the driveway (to the nearest intersecting streets on each side of the driveway which are not abutting the property), including the width, number of lanes, street parking, distance to the inter- secting streets, and the location and distance to other driveways on either side of the street. PAGE 18 1 1 i I 1 . (e) Contain any other information, plans, or specs- E fication required by the Department to deter- mine compliance with this Code. (2) Issuance of Permit- Conditions. The application, plans, and specs cat ons s la e rev ewe y the Department, to verify compliance with the requirements of this Code or any other ordi- nance. If the Department finds that the plans for the parking E lot or driveway for the property covered by the application conforms to this Code and other applicable ordinances, the permit shall be issued. The Department .nay issue a permit for property where any parking lot or driveway is not in compliance with this Code, if the Department determines that, because of same condi- tion peculiar to the property, compliance is not reasonably possible. Any permit issued may impose reasonable conditions or l imitations that would serve the purpose of any requirement of this traffiacrticle, or would including, otherwise not limited necessary to the following: for (a) Requiring that any existing driveway be relo- cated or that a new driveway be located so as to provide for joint or shared access by adjacent properties for present or future development. (b) Providing for vse restrictions or special design requirements for the driveway or parking lot it serves, such as divided one-way traffic, con- trolled turnir,q movements into or out of the driveway, or controlled access from the street. (c) Providing for temporary use of a driveway or parking lot for a specified time or for a limited purpose, or until the occurrence of a specified event. (3) Refusal of Permits* Appeals. An applicant may appeal any denial, con ton, or m tat on of a permit to the Committee. If the Committee upholds the refusal, condition, or limitation, the applicant may appeal to the Commission, which shall make a final determination after receiving a recommendation from the Citizen's Traffic Safety Support Commission. (4) Compliance. (a) All driveways and parking lots shall be designed, installed, located, and constructed in accordance with the approved specifications, plans, conditions, and requirements of the PAGE 19 1f E permit issued for the property and the require- for No aCertificate Of ments of this article. ny building on Occupancy shall be issued ea permit is required, any property for altera- tions the construction, i.mprovementthee, permit as tions, or other work covered by I completed in accordance with the permit issued, the requirements of this articlej o ordinanth provisions of any other applicable was required in Where no building permit mot, no connection with the requested p for parking lot or driveway on the property k which the permit was issued shall be used until and unless the work is and this Cod eted in accordance with the permit (b) Where the closing or relocating of one or mores existing driveways, or portions thereof, nts necessary to comply with thesece sireme shall be a permit issued hereunder, ac utter closed by the installation of curb andif any, along the figtter llin line of of the thexistingo driveway and the approach depression with asphalt or concrete, all in accordance with City specifications. If there is no existing curb and gutter on the Engineered in the street, sthe pecified by shall be manner sp ire b (5) Ex iration. Any permit issued hereunder shall expire by auth such limitation an ecame null and void if the form the orated y of such permit is not commenced within 180 days permit is suspended or permit, or if the work authorized by error of abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a p 180 days. performed (6) Modifications. After approval of the work p arm t e approved, no person shall thereafter alter or roved driveway or parking lot without submitting a under the -9e new change the applicati a provisions of this ppon in accordance with the p Division. (C) ACCESS TO ARTERIAL STREETS. (1) Pur ose. The following access regulations stet tspted are in recogn t on that primary and secondary routes carrying high desi intended to e used volumesdofntraffic. Each driveway as ess allowr.d to an arterial PAGE 20 1 lop I V F street will necessarily interfere with the function of those streets. These regulations, therefore, are adopted for the purpose of preserving and enhancing the traffic capacity of arterial streets by strictly limiting direct driveway access to those streets. (2) Drivewa Access to Arterials to be Designated b Prat. The location an points o access to arter a streets-sheTlBe determined and shown in accordance with the approved preliminary plat. No driveway shall be constructed which has not been shown on the approved preliminary plat. (3) Access Criteria. DrivEway access to a primary or i secondary arterial atreet shall be governed by the following criteria: (a) Access to any arterial street shall not be allowed unless there is no other reasonable means of providing safe and adequate access to the property. (b) Developments and residential subdivisions shall be required to provide a public marginal parallel access street, alley, or private parallel access drive to serve the development or individual lots fronting the arterial street, unless the requirement would make the property wholly useless for any permitted use as zoned. (c) No development shall be allowed access to an arterial street if property excluded from the development plans could have reasonably been used to provide adequate alternative access. (d) Any property previously subdivided in viola- tion of State law or City ordinance shall not be allowed access to any arterial street, if other access could have been provided except for such unapproved subdivision of the property. (4) Access Standards. When driveway access to an arterial street is the only reasonable means of providing safe and adequate access to the property, as determined in accordance with this article, the following standards shall apply; (a) Only one driveway per property shall be per- mitted, unless all of the following conditions are met: PAGE 2l 1 `f I i (i) the applicant submits a traffic engineer- ing study performed in accordance with accepted professional traffic engineering standards as determined by the City Engineer, clearly showing that the traffic for the single permitted driveway would exceed 5,000 trips per day, or 500 trips I per hour during peak hour use; (ii) permitting the additional driveway would not violate driveway separation or corner clearance standards; and (iii) the need for each additional driveway would substantially outweigh any traffic problems or hazards created on the arterial street by allowing the additional driveway. (b) The driveway shall, whenever possible, be required to be located and designed so as to provide joint or shared access with adjoining properties. (c) The development which is allowed access shall be required to pay for, design, or provide, at no cost to the City, all traffic control signs, equipment, structures, devices, or improvements which are reasonably necessary to minimize the effect of the additional access allowed or to provide for the safe movement of traffic or pedestrians. (D) ACCESS TO COLLECTOR STREETS. (1) Commercial, industrial, and multi-family properties fronting on collector streets shall be allowed one driveway for each 75 feet of frontage on one street, provided that each drive- way would meet the separation and corner clearance requirements of this article. (2) Residential subdivisions shall be required to provide a marginal parallel access street, alley, or private parallel access drive to serve the individual lots fronting upon a collector street, in accordance with the access standards apiylicable to arterial streets. (3) If any lot for single family or duplex residential dwell- ings is allowed direct driveway access to a collector street, each PACE 22 i r i lot may be required to share a common, driveway. If shared access is not required, no lot shall be allowed more than oni driveway. (E) SEPARATION OF DRIVEWAYS. ~ r (1) These regulations are for the purpose of insuring that all driveways are separated by sufficient distance so as to avoid ` interfering with the safe movement of traffic. In interpreting I and applying the separation requirements, the following shall apply: (a) The separation requirements shall be determined in reference to any existing driveways on or off the property. Where applied to a property which is located adjacent to an undeveloped tract, the separation requirements shall account for the placement of future driveways on the adjacent undeveloped property. (b) The minimum separation specified may be reduced if the amount of street frontage for the pr•,3- perty is insufficient to allow for one driveway access that would have the necessary separation from an existing driveway on adjacent property. If a reduction in the minimum separation specified is allowed, the separation shall be reduced only to the degree iecessary to allow for the driveway. (c) The separation distances specified shall be measured from the nearest edge of etch driveway at the right-of-way line. (2) The minimum driveway separation standards are as follows: Street Minimum (in feet) h Arterials 300 Collectors 75 ` Local/Estate 10 1 PAGE 23 h 4 I~k I I M CORNER CLEARANCE STANDARDS. (1) To insure that the traffic movements from driveways do not unduly conflict with the movement of traffic on intersecting public streets, the following minimum distances between driveways and the intersections of public streets are adopted. In inter- preting and applying the standards, the following shall apply: (a) A reduced requirement may only be used if abso- lutely necessary to provide driveway access to property where no other means of access meeting the corner clearance requirement is reasonably possible. (b) The specified distances shall be measured at the right-of-way line from the edge of the driveway nearest the intersecting street to the right-of-way line of the intersecting street. (2) The minimum corner clearance requirements are as follows: Intersection Type Minimum (in feet Arterial - Arterial 250 Arterial - Collector 150 Arterial - Local 50 Collector - Local 50 I PAGE 24 i a i (G) DRIVEWAY WIDTHS AND GRADES. (1) Widths. Driveways shall meet the following width stan- dards, un eT-ss adjoining properties provide for shared access of one driveway, in which case a driveway of greater width as E necessary to serve traffic from both properties may be permitted upon approval of the City Engineer. I I Curb (a) Single or Two-family Use Width (ft.) Radius (ft.) Maximum 20 5 Minimum 10 5 (b) Other Land Uses Tw xo i Wa Driveway Mamum 24 30 20 Minimum 10 One-Way Driveway Single any/exit Maximum 15 20 Minimum 12 10 Two lane exit only Ra`ximum 30 20 Minimum 24 10 (c) Upon a showing that significant projected truck traffic creates the need for modification of the above, the following maximum driveway designs may be permitted upon approval of the City Engineer: Curb Width 'ft. Radius (ft.) Two-Way Driveway 35 30 (2) Drivewa Graden. All driveways accessing public streets shall have no more tan a fifteen percent (15X) grade and shall have a minimum 6 inch rise from the gutter line to the radius point. PAGE 25 1 , 1 r` (H) PARKING LOTS. E In order to insure that the use and design of parking lots do not unreasonably interfere with the efficient and safe use of the public streets, the following regulations shall apply: i (1) All properties shall provide for the number of parking spaces as required by Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances. (2) The dimensions of all parking spaces shall be in accor- dance with the dimensions shown in Appendix A-5, f (3) Parking lots shall be located or designed so as not to require vehicles to back into a public street, a parking lot travel lane or the area where parking area aisles intersect with travel lanes, as shown in Appendix A-5. (4) Perking lots shall be designed so that no part of any public street will be used as a maneuvering area, travel lane, or a parking area aisle for any parking lot. Each driveway shall have the required vehicle stacking distance within the parking lot as specified in Appendix A-5, provided, however, the City Engineer may impose a greater stacking distance in particular cases, when clearly necessary so to prevent interference with the use of any public street. Each stacking area shall be designed as to be separated from the remaining portion of the parking lot. (5) Each property on which is located a business or facility which offers drive through window service, such as fast food restaurants and banks, shall provide the minimum required vehicle reservoir capacity within the parking lot, as specified in Appendix A-5, so that vehicles will not interfere with the use of any public street. (6) No property shall be designed to make use of the parking lot of another property without the express written permission of the owner of the other property. (7) All parking lots shall be so designed and constructed without view obstructions so that vehicles may enter, circulate through, and exit the parking lot in reasonable safety without danger to pedestrians or other vc'..icles. (8) Parking lots shall be designed, constructed. and maintained so that vehicles cannot extend beyond the perimeter of the lot onto adjacent properties, public rights-of-way, sidewalks, or areas used as walkways. PACE 26 1 r (9) No porti:i of any parking loth other than a driveway, shall be located within five feet (5 ) of any public street right-of-way. (10) Parking lots shall comply with the landscaping require- ments of any other ordinance. (11) All parking lots shall be surfaced with asphalt or con- crate in accordance with the specifications set forth in Appendix A-51 and shell be constructed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the City's N.T.G. Standard Specifications. The area shall be properly maintained in good condition so as to be free of potholes or other defects and so that all parking space lines or other markings are kept visible and distinct. Article 4.06. Reserved. SECTION It. That Appendices A-1 through and including A-7, thl9 aordinancea as part t fully regulations incorporated requirements of erein herein. SECTION III. That articles 4.17, 4.18, and 4.19 of Chapter IV o rt e e I of Appendix A of the Code or Ordinances are repealed. SECTION IV. That if atiiy section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid b any co+lrt of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City portions Taxes, dospite hereby any declares Council iemaining Denton, such r have enacted such r invalidity. SECTION V. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued there- under, as these provisions, regulations, requirements, or permits or certificates apply to any property located within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), 1 Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for I each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation r anys sordinance is uch violations scheperson c shall u be punished within conviction of the I limits abov6. SAGE 27 V SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall becom3 effective Secretary is hereby r directed date o cause the passage, of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten I (10) days of the date of its passage. 1 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1488. 1 I R ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: PAGE 28 F APPS ND X A - 1 STREET DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS Arterials Local/ Primary 225 CollecLor Residential Estate (1) Pavement width (face 2 2 (25')* 44 30 24 with 4:1 to face} (feet) side slopes (2) Number of traffic 6 4 4 2 2 ii lanes 11 11 12 (3) Lana widths (feet) 11 11 I (4) Right-of-Way (feet) 100** 80 60 50 60 (5) Vehicle capacity policy (vehicle per hour) 2,140*** 1,400*** 790 400 400 35 30 30 (6) Design speed (mph) 45 40 (7) Minimm grade (`1) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 7 7 1 (8) Maximum grade (x) 7 7 (9) Minimum center line radius (feet) 750 500 300 250 250 (10) dissanccee (site fast) 175 275 250 Z00 200 (11) Mininva median 14 14 n/a n/a n/a width (feet) (12) med an°op ainig (feet) 400 400 n/a n/a n/a (13) Minisaw radius for 20 20 No cue curb returns at in. 35 20 required tersections (fast) (14) Reverse curve 0 separation minim- (feet) 100 100 15 0 *Divided roadways, each with specified width. **Kight-of-way flares to one hundred twvnty (120') feet of right-of-way one hx-jred fifty (154') feat fm intersection on both aides intersecting other *or or secondary" arterial'. *Wtevel o Service "L( J r APPEUDiX A - 2 Design Standards for Connection of Perimter Streets to Off-Site Perimeter Streets 1) Minimum Length - 100' transition Minimum Pavement Section - 2" Asphalt - 6" lime - residential 5" Asphalt - 6" lime - Others 2) ltnffic control devices shall be installed to provide for safe, efficient, and properly marked use of the proposed transitional areas in accordance with the latest edition of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, published by the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, 3) Chart Min Min Design Radii Length Residential 250 100' Collectors 300 150' Secondary Arterial 500, 250, Major Arterial 750' As needed NOTE: All radii and lengths are based on actual street section constructed not classification. t t i N . APPENDIX A- 3. r (R~ I«M~Mb 4 I►Me T~ ~ Tpa at awm own 41 OMw ►MMMOM M AM ~ 1.1Mi I{,101► {111♦ PIUTTWO a" MO"Vw 10 SOWS 10 tf 1f MVILM t0 Y MwYhb 10 If tl /~Mf is is a 1lUS04 wl { / 10 M0*" 10 If II I VAN is % N OOMRJOATgN/ a" OIIM/ N 1/ tf tf opme 1/ It «w 1 10 1{ 1M/rrrl 10 I/ /0 two" 1I M M T~M/NVgft flyM T I ~ u ~ MMI/ Mg1if1/ 1 1 1{ If II IM• IM fall 1 / sell 1 1f 11 f{ f osiAC fl/Il f 1 T N f f 1f mWaft / 1N NO 11 Adis Mgif 1 N1/N1/MNIt ff mom ow MdnMf f 1 11 1fM11~ 1 11 M MTAL 11181 polwo CATimw • 0 40 No malwvw= 44 Ow"Y.Pomm II[C11CLS 1 1 ti I APPENDIX A-4 ALLEYS AND PRIVATE ROADS KINDMK MUIREKEMTS FOR ALLEYS (REAR ACCESS) I„Mjp},m Yidt3 I Minimum I Kiniaus Thiatnan I KinlsA E I I (Center Linel I" I NO-$Omat I Use IPaysmatIEuemantI Radius ImAsDhaltIsConcrate I C.,grnar Clis } Raaidaatial I 12' 16' I So' S" I S" E S' X S' I Non I I I ! 1 I Residential I 16' I 20' I 50' I 6" l 6" 110° 110' I I l I 1 I I KINLWH RWIREKEMRS FOR PRIVATE ACCESS ROADS MAIM I I Kinlaum I MaLsum Hickbeas pjL~Mt Width laooter Liael I'* I Use 0" Nor tw war Wium ' alt lCgAgrot I 20 I 21 f I I I Residential I I I SO' I s" I S" I IEXoludima Parkinal I I I Moo I 26' I 50' I 6' I 6" I Residential IUotudinN ParklnEl I I I ,1 I I I l Heed in Psrkiaa is disoour ded alone Private roads, but ay W Permitted a1*" 50 or less of the lesjth of the road. s All sestinas sn to We 6 insbes of lime sub{rsde. Concrete sections are to be reinforced with 3/6 inch bus on 24 inch centers or 6X6 number 6 wire mesh. 20 foot is minimw fire lace requlremant. 0669e/2 I i APPENDIX A-5 PARUNG LOT SURFACE (MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS) minimum Pavement Thickness I *Coacrete As halt i Existing unpaved Parking Lot i 5 inches with 12 inches with I compacted base 16 inches flex base S I I New Parkin Lots k Fire and Drive Lanes 15 inck,es with i 5 inches with 16 inch lime subgradel 6 inch lime subgrade _ I Parking Area 15 inches with 2 inches with I compacted base 6 inches flex base I * Concrete sections are to be reinforced with 3/8 inch bars on 24 inch centers or 6 x 6 number 6 wire mesh. Construction materials and methods are to conform to North Texas Council of Governments standard specifications and City of Denton addenduma to the NTCOG specifications. NOTE: The City of Denton strongly encourages parking lot materials that have both aesthetic and structural qualities. A list of approved materials and suppliers can be obtained from the Department of Public Works. The following types of materials are approved for these uses on parking lots: 1. Pavers (Paving Stones) 2. Patterned Concrete (Colored) 3. Grid Type Pavers 009e/3 ( F ryi R I N APPENDIX A• 5 PARKING LOTS SPACE USED FOR VARIOU PARKING SPACE DIMESIONS AND MANEUVERING AREAS t I PARALLEL E]~ v' ® °u N' j2~2- -a 70• /S A N d 45• t ♦ . pf 1 t h APPENDIX A_ 5 PARKING LOTS 21 N 1 I Q No L- 8.40 a ; 10.4 C ~ J V i 0 2 4" 90• No A s a, N •NUMSER OF PARKING SPACES L LENGTH Of PARKING SAYS ~ (2) COMPACT PARKING SPACES Woof' r- 19 0 ~Tn 19 •0 ~ 1 4 t i N ! APPENDIX A- 5 PARKING LOTS (3) ~ 18~ ~Z4 (Af1 ~ IA' k ~ V C X20 000 of t Y c ? 109 a 1 -6 .49 N ~ O r 24' I>< IT 7 HARKING AISLE s J JLuj STREET I d N C APPENDIX Ass 5 PARKING LOTS MrYUM STACFM atarura* ltlppt 1 f o 51 - loo + 20' 101. 250 40, 251 - 500 601 501 am over Twilloastudy P4u1rN vwro FM ORII/E THOUGH FACILITIEs Drive Thru Facilitioa ati x w ~x V Y as M 24 y~ q 14 u a 0669a/1 4 p s0 do n qp lap A, ntaga Xt++~+D,t oe 40 Ida 'a goo vo uo Cars Atelvissq outlt.q Pwk Rout i i c APPENDIX Am 6 ~Q.E~KALK AN HANn~ree ' RAMP UETAlLS 4.0' Top 01 r l { pDOreoCn SIo Slope (Moc.) PII fl _I yr Exioflo ~lytw-its! Ion 4ASJ To 0f curb - T''ff OrirewROMP R L Of curb •.f~ lit" 10 .tl6lstQl.G® RRi ~ p r VeNee 4 , #Vuio ~Eoisffiet curl 2" SeeE NOW - i I ti APPENDIX A-7 TEMPORARY TURN-ABOUNDS ` Minimum n mum Thickness I Use Outside Radius Crushed Rock Asphalt i Residential 45' b" 2" f r j I Other Than 45' 10" 5" Residential * Turn-grounds require a b" lime subgrade. DISTANCE SPACING BETWEEN INTERSECTING STREET CLASSIFICATIONS Arterials Collector Local Arterials 51280 10000 400 (if permitted) Collectors 1,000 11000 200 Local 400 (if permitted) 200 200 1 1 i V P 6 2 Minutes hatch 23, 1988 Page 8 7. The fire lane provided in Phase I between the admini- atration building and the classroom building may be removed as a part of Phase III and curbing shall be installed In the location indicated on the site plan. S. Perimeter street paving and sidewalks will be required ` with any development in Phase It or the City Engineer [1 may recommend an escrow agyreement for the improvements at the time of approval of the final plat for Phase It. 9. A screening device shall be constructed, during Phase 1, along the western edge of the proposed parking lot and extending to the property line, as shown on the site plan. Motion carried $-I. (Ms. Brock voted no.) 0. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL AEILAT Or LOTS 12 AND 13 TO LOT 13R MCA H, . I Four notices were sailed to property owners in preceding I subdlvlsioni one reply fors was received in favor, none were received in opposition. S7APP REPORT: Mr. Carson stated that this 0.73 acre vac s ocateo north at Usk Forrest Circle and west of Forrestrfdge Drive and is toned SE-16. City services and facilities are available and the Oat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The Development Review Committee recommends approval to combine two lots into one large lot to allow for the development of a residence on a lot larger than 16,000 square feet, PE1I710NERt Brian Burke, Burke Enafneering, stated he is representing the owner and would answer any questions that i the Commission may have. IN FAYORt None Present. OPPOSED: None Present. REBUTTAL: None offered. Chair declafred the public hearing closed. DECISION: Ms, Cole moved to recommend sp roval of Tie preTIminary and final re Flat of Lots 12 and 13 to Lot 13R, block H, of the Forrestrfdge Addition, r$action 111. Seconded by Ms. tiker and unanimously carried (7.0), IV, CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLES 1.01 ARTICLE T)ADTARRLh5 to provide or new an amended regulations and re u resents for streets, drive way a, parking lots, and ` s! ewalkst repealing Articles 1.17 and 1.18 of Appendix Al providing for a severability clausal pproviding a penalty in ` the maximum amount of $500.00 for violatlons thereof; and providing for an effective date. As, Carson said that she would outline the provisions as they differ from the existing subdivision regulations, also gate possible revisions recommended brra developer committee consisting of Virgil Ftrange and Bob Denedict. She said some items have been discussed briefly at a couple of study sessions. 'I 1 i r' F" r i ti P 6 Z Minutes March 23, 1966 Page 9 DIVISION 1. General Provlsions: Article 4.01 - Purpose and Intent p. 2 - This section has been added as a will be a separately adopted ordinance by City Council, Article 4,01 - Applics~lon and Interpretation of Standards p. • ta esent was added that Commission shall nave final authority unless otherwise provided for in code, rollowing ` recent changes in the variance procedure. Article 4,01 - City Participation p. 3 A provision so that c e ty may increase the sire or scope of the improvements. DIVISION It. Street and Sidewalk Requirements and Design Standards: Article 4.04 1 A. Street Classification p. S I 1) Primary Arterial will include freeways - (Loop 296 and 1.35, as recommended by Land Use Planning Committee), S) Estate Subdivision permits streets without curb and gutter if the use is for single family on one acre or larger lots and has 100 or more 'feet of street frontage. 7) Marginal Parallel Access. A street which is parallel and adjacent to an arterial street and will be used to eliminate direct driveway access to the arterial (with one entrance and hsving a feeder road). S. Compliance with Specification p. 4 1% Street Capacity P. S 3) An option to permit dedication of more street right- of-way than required In lieu of constructing the total street system, The Commission must approve and the criteria must be followed includin that omitting the improvements would not substantially impair the safe movement of traffic. I D. Perimeter Streets p. 6 1) New Perimeter Streets shalt provide the portion of perimeter street for which it reasonably creates the need, but In no case less than 25 feet. Twenty-five feet would allow for two way traffic, developer has actually created the need for two lanes and should construct that. Presently the developer is required to provide 17 feet and city participates in center 7 feet, which is costly to the city. 2) Existinjj Perimeter Streets. Required to dedicate the f right-c!-way and improve or reconstruct the street to the some extent as required for new perimeter streets or to the extent necessary to complete the perimeter street to the classification required, S) Exceptions to Perimeter Street Requirements. The requirements shall not apply tot m) a plat for a single family Iotl or b) a development with less than 100 feet of frontage on an existing perimeter streets or I i N P i Z Minutes ' March 25, 1988 Page lu 1 c) a d velopment that does not require or does not prolose to extend a city water line and 1s further than 8,000 feet from an existing water line, Me, Carson stated that this provision allows a deveto ppment that "nes not requiro extension of a waterline from tTe City of ' ton and is farther than 8,000 feet from an existing wattrline to be exempted from perimeter street paving Improve- 1F ments. She said this item has raised a question about the F compact growth policy proposed by the Denton Development Plan which states that the city may participate in or may not r - quire a developer within one half mile of Loop 288 to do o f- site improvements, and outside the one helf tulle area the developer 1s required toy all costs for improvements. J..e said it appears there could be a potential conflict in this area and this has been discussed with the Land Use Planning Committee team captains. Mr. Robbins further explained that the Denton Development Plan draft says that the developer may not have to pay for off site roads within the one half silt area. The road would be left as is until developed by the city or by adjacent lend owners. He said the lryylementation would be set out In the subdivision regulations. he explained that this is a consequence of the City Council direction to proceed with a policy of ending variances. he said the difference between the two ideas is one is proposed a policy, that proposed subdivision regula- tions do not speak to the one half mile issue at all. The existing regulations say that if you have perimeter street pawing you do it. Proposed regulations say If you exceed the 8,600 toot line you do not ~ave to do perimeter street improvements. he said he felt that Council was concerned about the one half rile line we the 8,000 foot line as the one half alla policy could be more expensive to the City. he said the farther the line is moved back in towards town, the higher the potential for the cost to the city to go up or the impact of the road not being improved beam vse the city can't afford to Improve it. Hr. Glasscock asked if it was 8,000 feet from an existing waterline, hr. RobLins agreed. No. Riker said she felt it meant that the developer could came in, build uyy the area, and not pay for anything. Mr. Robbins explained thst regulations are dealing with perimeter street paving and would except only the developer w&o does not extend city waterlines. He said It would probably not be a major development it the developer does not need a waterline and is one and one halt silts frog in existing waterline. Ms, Riker expressed her concern about what would happen in 10 or IS years when the property was snnexed, and asked who would pay for the road, I Robbins sold it would depend on where the waterline is, Me explained another difference in the two policies is that tha one half mile policy is static and the 4,000 foot policy remits with the extension of a waterline, he said when a waterline is extended, it will alter the area where exception would be authorized, as the 8,000 toot line would move out. Ms. Riker said she thought the city ought to do it right the first time, that when someone is going to develop, it should be decided then who pays rather than the question coming up later when property is annexed. Mr, Glasscock pointed out that now the developer only has to develop half the rood at 17 feet accoroO R to the regulations. Mr, Robbins agreed, P 11 2 Minutes March 23, 1981 Pete 11 Ms, Brock commented that if someone is reQufred to pave only the 17 toot strip then that pavement would probably be worth, less 10 years from now, Mr. Clark agreed statins that classy flu tions and standards for streets ray totally change In a lu year period, Mr, Glasscock asked Mr. Clark if he recommended the 8,000 toot line. Mr. Clark said yes. Mr. Glass:ock sold he agreed also. Chairman asked what density of develo,+sent would require city water, Ms, Carson explained that the subdivision regulations currently specify that a water well cat only serve three fasi- ties. She said that most area water s stems allow a four inch waterline which is not adequate to sere anything sore than a residential type developeent. She said that some type of ` industrial or commercial might move ints these areas but it I is unlikely that any major type develop cent is going to go in that would not extend City of Denton waterlines. She said M anything that might be allowed to develor without perimeter street Improvements would be scaething n ry small and resi- dential in nature, maybe $0 lots, i Chairman asked about 1,000 vs 10,SOO feet Ms. Carson said I that at this time there have been only three developers that would have been exempted by the 8,000 feet j Chairman referred to the areas that were discussed earlier with inadequate facilities, mainly the ■obi'a home parks, lie said that now, 10 years Is ter, these mobile hoes, parks are ask- ing the cityy to give them some improvements. Mr, Glasscock said that file county has regulations for in* e. Chairman said that he did not want to leave the nest generation with the same problems that the city Is now having. Mr. Glasscock asked it this discussion was ■e$~ly about roads. Ms, Cation said yes, the only thing that would be exempt is perimeter street improvements. Ms, stock suggested that it would be cheaper to 11at one lot at a time, compered to the cost of perimeter str et pavins, Mr. Clark stated that during the platting protest, the devel- oper or owner has to prove that he does not own e y of the surrounding property. Ms. Corson added that under the final pplst provisions a developer cannot plot around lmp'ovements. if the City determines that there are improvements seeded, such as a street, a developer cannot plat around th is. Ms. Carson said that the current regulations allow tie Comaiulon to waive requirements for residential deve'opment of three acres or three lots, She said it would be extremely costly to do lnfill development In some areas where st4ff would like to promote development and staff felt one lot is proposed seemed more reasonable than three lots as in tle current regulations, Ms, Biker stated that she felt the rules veto too loose Gtr L! the developer. Chairman stated that this data not alter the tequirements for building a subdivision within the ETJ, that a developer still his to meet the city's subdivision regulstions, He sold cur- rent subdivision regulations state that a developer has to put in perimeter street Improvements, this regulation states that the developer is just exempted from making perimeter street pavle improvements it he is outside 1,000 foot lWa from in exist~nI waterline. M1, Corson said that the developer vould still be required to do drainage improvements, provide information on septic tanks/ water well service, and it is feasible he would have to do i i 1 , I P 8 2 Minutes March 23, 1988 Page 12 patching or overlay of streets. He would not be required to put down the base and pavement to actually construct a new street along his perimeter. Chairman Said that the question is "Who's right?"; the polity proposed In the Denton Development Plan to go with the One-half mile outside the existing and proposed Loop 188, or to support the 8,000 feet that the Counell has asked tor. I Ms. Brock said that there is no direct conflict, there is a potential conflict. I ' Chairman cramented that as Mr. Robbins pointed chit, this could I be detrimen~al fiscally to the City if someone developed inside E the half mile vs the 8,000 feet. Mr. Clark amid that the exemption only applies to perimeter street paving. Ms. Brock asked If it were possible that this ordinance, as written, would encourage developers to go outside the 8,000 foot limit rather than developing in the area; that the Devel- opment Plan wants to encourage compact growth. Mr. Robbins said there is some degree but staff did not think it is very great. he said that staflR Is finding that the degree of the amount of help that the city would give outside the 8,000 foot j line is not s enlficant beta use it excludes a major develop- cent, as a major development would need city water, Ms. Carson stated that staff has not experienced a great deal of growth outside the 8,000 foot lino, She said that every time a development extends the utility line, that extends the 8,000 feet, and makes it further away for them to have to go to develop outside the 8,000 foot line. Chairman stated he realised that this ordinance should be acted on quickly but he has concerns about forcin develop- sent outside the 8,000 foot line and thinks that is ■ question that should be addressed further. He Suggested that since there are still other items on the agenda, the ordidance should be tabled and rescheduled as a work sesslon for the next meeting. Mr. Clark asked that It be put on the agenda as a considers- tfon item slain to that if questions are resolved, the Cos- mission tau~d make a recommendation. He advised that there are still two developers who are wafting for regulations to be approved. Ms. Brock suggested continuing with the discussion at this time. Chairman suggested having a special called meeting to consider subdivision regulations only. Dates were discussed but no • reement was reached. Cbairman repeated that his concern is people waiting in the audience for their item to be considered. Chairman Claiborne moved to table ordinance to April 13 meeting Ls u ss a consideration item, Seconded by Ms. Biker and unanimously rrled d (7.0), V. DIRECTOR'S REPORT A. STATUS OF REQUEST FOR INTENSITY CHANGE from low to moderate TnFen31T on proper Cr ocT-aFeo'67['ween "Highway 7T, Bonnie Brae Street, and Riney Road. Mr. Robbins said that the proponents have withdrawn, at this time, from their moderate intensity application. They will probably proceed with a toning application, ~f F ;i f F 8 2 Minutes April 13, 1968 Page 14 IY, CONSIDER PRELIMINARY AEPLAT OF LOTS 2SA•11 BLOCK A AND LGTS 7n 311 A55 -3bB. BLQ(;l 8. Qf_ STAFF REFORT: Ms. Carson said that this is an 1.021 mere trace Zccated south of Audra Lane and east of Brittany Orive. She stated that this is a replat in conjunction with he recom- mendation made earlier by the Commission to amend a riannea development (PL-63), Single family development is 61ticipated. She added that city services and facilities are available, the plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Sub- division and Land Development Regulations and the Development Review Committee recommends approval. PETITIONER: Bud Hauptman, Metroplex Engineering, said that he k wou answer any questions that the Comalssion may have. DECISION: Mr. Glasscock moved to recceaend approval of the pre s naryy replat of Lots 2SA•21, Block A, and Lots 2OA-34D and 36A•38B, Block B of the Audra Meadows Addition. Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (7.0). Y. CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING_AATICLES '_.0l . CLE 'ORDINANC'ES to provide or new an asenaa regulations and ~ requirements fer streets, driveways, parking lots, and sidewalks; repealing Articles 1.17 and 1.16 of Appendix Al providing for a severability clause; providing a penalty in the maximum amount of MOM for violations thereof; and providing for an effective date. It was moved by Mr, Claiborne, seconded by Mr. Holt, and unanimously carried (7-0) to remove item from table, STAFF REPORT: Ms, Carson stated that a revised copy of t et a r"Fi eeulaifon$ has been provided to the Commission for this ■ettlrg. She said that some changes were side to the docuu nt but they were than is that were made prior to the March 23d ■eetlmg, She expfaln^d the changes as: 1. The definitions on Pages 3 and / have been alphabetized (Article 1,04A); 2, The measurement for vehicle trips was clarified on Pages 1 and S (Article 1,018); 3. The deferral section has been revised and teorganized on Pages 6 and 7 (Article 1.01E); and 1. The lenguage In the section dealing with off-site street improvements has been revised in regard-to an exemption on Page a (Article 4,01F). Ms. Carson otated that perimeter streets were discussed at last setting end she wanted to clarify that perimeter streets are only the portion of the roadway in front of the pro arty being platted. The exceptions to perimeter street requirements are essentially only for the properttes that are farther than 6,000 feet from an existin water line and water lines were not proposed for extension, said that staff has detersintd that In the Last Srear and a half there were only four instances where that would aavt been a factor, Ms. Carson said that there is also in exception for a single (sally residential lot and for development that has less than 100 feet of frontage on an existing perimeter street as it was felt that 100 feet via not a great enough distance to make improvements to a roadway. DIVISION 11 - Street and Sidewalk Requirements and Design Standards Article 1.01 (continued) C 3 I P 6 Z Minutes April ll, 1968 Page IS F, Improvements to Existing Off-Site Streets p. 6 Ms. Cation stated that In regard to perimeter street improvements, any development that generates more than 100 vehicle trips per day would be required to do off- site Improvements, by patching reconstructing, or over- laying with asphalt, as determined to be necessary. Mr. Claiborne asked who would resolve the dispute, it 11 two Individuals disagreed. Ms, Carson sold it would be the City Engineer, As stated on page 9 of the subdivi- sion regulations, in accordance with the rating chart In Appendix A•1, It Ms, Brack asked where the funding would come from. { Ms. Carson stated that developer would be required to I make Improvements. She added that if the City of Denton is proposing, under the Capital Improvements Plan, to do Improvements wlthin one year, then the requirements would not apply. G. Adequate Street Access p. 9 M. Coordination with Surrounding Streets p, 10 i t. Intersections p. 10 J. Medians p, 11 Ms. Carson said that in a discussion with the developers regarding this section, there were alternative proposals. Staff Pro osals (77 ppow ons of the median less than eight (a) feet In vtdtA shall be installed with a maintenance free surface of concrete, Other portions of the radian the11lanslforawhichvshell betapprovalabyatheyParks and fecreation Department, Derelo ers, Alterma Tres k&J oT ons o e median Isis than eight (R) feet in width shall be installed with a maintenance free surface of concrete or similar material approved by the City Engineer, excluding asphalt. Ms, Carson said that this would lire an option to do or not to do pavers, since they are expensive. Staff Pro osalt or every 16000 square feet of median area or portion thereof not of a concrete surface, a tree with a trunk of three (1) inches or mere in diameter, measured from Rround level, shall be Installed, The type of trees used shall be from an approved list maintained by the parka and Recreation Department, The median area shall be soon with Areas in the manner and of the type speci- fied by the Parks and Recreation Department. Derelo ors' Alterma v t ee POT 11111 c he radian shall be landscaped or xerlseapad in accordance vith pplane approved by the City, For every 1,000 square feet of median area or part ion thereof not of a maintenance free surface, a tree with a trunk of three (I) inches or more in diameter, measured at round level, shall be installed. The tree typpe used shall be from an approved list main- tained by the Parks and Aedrea.,,n Department, i .i N P 6 2 Minutes April 11, 1486 Page 16 ~ I Ms. Carson said that developers added the term xerlscaped, which possibly elSalnateI water having to be placed In the medians or the City's having to maintain the area. Ms. Brock asked wheat xeris aped meant. Ns, Carson said rat it a are drought me. Carson said that basically the only changes are to l ellmSna[e pavers and to eliminate autoaatlc water Srrt- lotion systems. I. Cul•da•sacs and Dead End Str•ats p. 12 i L. Allays p. 12 l` Ms, Carson said this is not to establish that residential areas would have alleyat the Commission or developet Say wish to hen required,l+lleyesvouldebeapi3rate endanotcdedicatedept w to the city. M, Private Roads p. 12 Ns. Carson said privets roads are only allowed in tanned development districts and that an owners' association assumes responsibility for those roads. N. Stres% Names and Signs p. 16 Me, Carson explained that this vas approved by the oe year &1 0 0. Street Lighting p. 14 P. Fire Lanes p. 1e ordinance Carlos Said d Was iAdoptedoearliersthistyear. lane Q, Sidewalks p. le Ms. Carson said that the developer committee had proposed an alternative, Ste£f Pre osmlt er''e'I'o menu shall within tho•dedieated ri ht• o'- ~:vaY, provide sidewalks along both sides of ae1 streets within the development mad along one side of all palliator streetsl provided, however, that whenever this Code provides for an exception ostheet requirement of Improving an existing to City specifications no sidevol# shll be required s ralong the exist(nR perlmet Strait unless It Is a state or federal ighway, In which shell be required. Develo ors' Alt 6atir t trYTTMIMP-Byzents a all, within the dedicated r1`ht•o£•vay, provide sidevalkst streets both oandfabuttinglaadevelopment rand along one side of all arterial and collector patimeter streets, and (b) along one side of all local straits within a development and along one tide of a local perimeter street location determined by the City Englnear, when the development Is located within one and one-half miles of a public school of park. R P 8 i Minutes April 13, 1986 Page 17 Ms. Cnarson said the location Of required sidewalks within cause thatelsathemarea forawhichlthetschoolydistrict does not provide public transportation. She said suy estlons had also been made to locate sidewalks at curb line and to make them narrower. She also referred to paragraph (S) which states that when perimeter street Improvements are deferred, required side- walks may also be deterred except alone state and federal highways. DIVISION III. Driveway and Parking Lot Requirements and Design Standards: Article t.OS A. Definitions p, 16 3. Permit Procedures and Requirements p. 16 Ms. Canon said that a driveway permit is required by current re1ulationsi a permit requirement Is added for a parking lot to ensure adequate spaces and design. C. Access to Arterial Streets p. 20 Ms. Carson said the intent is to limit direct driveway accost to arterial streets. D. Access to Collector Streets p. 22 i Ms. eCarson stated that ppfdrmcoe2erclal, ancollectorastreet, She saidrresidentiallsubdivisions streetsjothey shouldthaveomarginalrparallelsaccessstreets or alloys or private parallel access drives or share too- sort driveways. Chairman questioned paragraph (2) "Residential subdivisions sha11 be required to provide a marginal parallel access street, a11ey or private parallel access drive to serve the in di vlduoi lots fronting upon a collector street, in accordan.a with the access standards applicable to arterial streets,., he asked what It meant. subdivision houlddnotthat hays a drivetwiaynonto a collector street. He sold that during peak hours a lot of col- p tlons ihdald noiebeeeneouiijedte~MisiildoNwayresidenti+l subdivisions should have access drives to enter into from a collector street, Chairsan Claiborne sold he could see something heCpening similar to what exists on Ector strut. He said he had alxed emotlors about it. F Hr. Clark said this Is not the only option, that alleys ate another option. He said collector streets are as important as arterials during peak hours. Mr. Holt said he didn't think drives in front looked good and drives provided in back take away from the yard arms. He said he traveled during peak hours and didn't its a problem with collectors. Hs, Brock inquired about shared driveways. ti 1 l ~yyy P 6 2 Minutes April 13, 1966 Pale 1 Ms. Carson explained that if any single family or duplex lot is allowed direct driveway access to a collector street, each lot might be required to share a common driveway, Ms, glker commented that a shared driveway could contain four or five cars that didn't belong to the owner of a house. Mr. Clark further advised that proposed regulations would not alter existing areas and that regulations would to established for new areas. Chairman commented that he had a problem regarding rear entry access. He said alleyways look good on paper but serious problems are created when all propperty owners erect six foot wooden fences, making it dlffl ult to back into the alley and exit to street, Mr. Clark said staff would like to encourage developpers to not front houses on collector streets and to utilise residential streets for access to collector streets, Chairman said he would agree with arterials but not with collectors. He said he would not want to force rear of lots to be against a collector. Mr. Clark asked it Commission ranted to change warding in paragraph (2) from "sAa11" to "may". Mr. Holt asked who would decide. Ms. Carson said It would be decided at final plat stage, Mr, Clark said that the Commission should think about how much infrastructure casts; the more infr a tructurt the city has, the more maintenance costs. He said a true collector should not bays traffic backing into tt; the more traffic is restricted, the more streets are needed. He said the safety fatter should also be considered; the more true collectors struts there are, the fewer accidents would occur. He said a true collector is to carry traffic from residential streets to arterials. Chairman C3aibarne commented that he didn't feel right about not allowing Individual driveways. Mr. Clark said he was thinking of the future, that Denton wouldn't be the same in 10 years, B. Separation of Driveways p, 22 1. Corner Clearance Standards p. 23 G. Driveway Widths and Grades p, 21 H. Parking Lots p. 29 Ms, Carson stated that this Is an attempt to put into one are& what is currently In tonic ordinance, She said a flea (3) foot setback from public right•of•vay for cay parking ;-ace is being recommended for safety reasons. Ms. Carson said staff would like to know how Commission feels about suggested alternatives and she would answer any ques- clans Commission might hays regarding the proposed regulations, Chairman asked for comments from the audience. i N p 6 2 hinut ea ' April IS, 1988 8 1 i J.V. Strange, a local developer, said that he would like to M ask the Commission to consider the alternatives suggested for sidewalks. He said he thought that sidewalks In residential subdivisions should be restricted to within one and one-half miles of a school and only on one side of the street rather than on both sides. He said the cost is 56,00/per linear foot for the sidewalks and this cos, is passed on to the homeowner. He said that he would also like the Commission to consider reducing the width of sidewalks from four feet to three feet and moving the sidewalk closer to the curb, aue to the water, sewer, gas, and other lines being placed under the sidewalks. He sold streets are built prior to homes which can create a yrobles when developer his to tear out sidewalks to serve houses with utilities. Chap man asked about escrowing sidewalks allowing developer to come back and put in a sidewalk system rather than doing it piecemeal, as a two lot sidewalk does nuc serve a purpose. Ms. Carson said that the only exemption to sidewalks could be found on pate is, paragraph (S) ".,.,...In any case, the requirement Eor sidewalks may be deferred in the same manner as for perimeter streets where the existia perimeter street is proposed to be vldeued or improved in t~t foreseeable { future, as shown by the City's Capital Improvement Plan cr a current State plan, if the widening or construction wool! require the removal or relocation of the required sidewalks". t Mr. Holt asked if proposed regulations address location of sidewalk. Me, Clark referred to Appendix A•6, examples of sidewalks. Mr, Claiborne asked how many feet are between the sidewalk and the curblins. Mr. Clark said that it is five.and one-half feet for a normal residential street, DECISiOHi Commissioners discussed pages 7 and 80 Division 11, rt?v IT1.01, (8)(3) Exceptions to Perimater Street Require- ments. 4 Ma. Stock said her concerns are that the 8,000 toot line may 1 drive development out to EtJ that developers will plan one f lot at a time, that people will So into areas that meet this criteria. She said she Is concerned that this is being su jested because it will be taster for Commissioa and Counci~ not to have to consider to many variances. Me, Holt commented that this involves only pavin . Chairman commented that he shared the concern about the ,000 foot line but he is willing to live staff the benefit of doubt, that he will vote to approve with the ey deri t andoieteret the commission will be keeping w class Ms, Stock moved to eliminate U6 Eaeeptions to Perimeter Street Requirements, Article 4, ivision 11, Street and Sidewalk Requirements and Desittn Standards, from the proposed rejulmttons. Seconded by Ms. [iktr. Vote was called: Ay-: • Brock, Cole Kiker Hay Claiborne, Alasscock, Molt, Kama*:, Motion failed (3.4). Commissioners discussed page 11, Division 11, Article 4,04, (J) Medians. Mr, Claiborne moved to acce t alternatives to (J) kedions, Article 4.01, bAviston It Street and Sidewalk Requirements and Desiln Standards, as follow : I 4 f V P 6 2 Minutes April 13, 196b Page 20 (2) All portions of the median less than eight (4) feet in width shall he installed with a maintenance free surface of concrete or similar material approved by the City Engineer, excluding asphalt. (3) Other portions of the median shalt be land sca ed or xeriscapped in accordance with plans approved gy the city. for every 1,000 square feet of median area or portion thereof not of a maintenance free surface, a [see with ■ trunk of three (3) inches or more in diameter, measured at ground level, shainstalled. The tree type used she 1 be from an approved maintained gy the Parks and Recreation Department. ` I Seconded by Mr. Halt and unanimously carried (?•O). i Cammissionars discussed pages 14 and 1S, Division lt, Article 4.04, (Q) Sidewalks. Ms. Brock stated that she is in favor of ordinance as written I rather than for alternatives children to Play, especiallydeshlotsigetalks are a place ;i smaller. i Ms. 91ker concurred, stating that the thinks sidewalks are important. i 3:r. Clsiburne stated that one of the recommendations of the s Land Use planning Committee was to have sldewaikson bot■n sides of ■ street. He said he is in favor of a pedestr getting on sidewalks and being able to traverse the City but from a practical. standpoint he wondered if si4ewalks are really I needed on both sides of a street. He said on a collector or et rooter, he fools they are necessary{ on a lesser street, he sn't Ao u l d sbe elocHteasked Mr. Clark where he thought sidewalks s ,i Mr. Clark answered as shown on Appendix A•d. He said that sidewalks linen so placed will not havesto beitorn uppewhen sroe the break occurs in the water line, but with today's improved alsormighttcoosidsiuaoving the location o4 the watertlint. y Ms. Kiker asked how City felt about eople puttin in their ow; sidewalks, Mt. Clark answered Jet the City does not try I to stop them. At Holt commented that It is not very difficult to walk in ir. e street oneboth sides of the streets not Eeel std r.alks Ms. Brock said that people are befneeencouragged lob all mor ire, that Jogging and biking paths are k needed. Mr. Claiborne moved to accept amended alternative to (Q) as followstnd Sidewalk ` Requirements r and l Dmmign 0 Standerdi, It I (2) All developments shell, within the dedicated ri ht•of•way, provide sidewalkai la~ ttf@otiowithineandf■buttingl■gdevelopmentrand along one side of all arterial gild collector perimeter streets, and (b) along one side of all local streets within a development and along one side of a local perimeter street, determined location by the City Engineer. Motion died for lack of second. l r t ti I P d Z Minutes April 13, 1986 Page 21 I Commissioners discussed page 22, Division III, Article J.OS, Ij (D) Access to Collector Streets. Mr. Clark stated that every requirement cannot he specified, that staff is trying to discourage access to collector streets. For instance, if development Is only one or two lots an alley would not be put in, if for larger development of 20.12 lots it might be acceptable. He said parallel drive Is best, least desirable option Is shared access. Cn question, he said shared access could be one narrow entry drive that widens to two sepa- rate driveways or one wide driveway. Ms. Cole and Ms. Kiker left the meeting. Mr. Ifolt moved to change wording in paragraph (2) from "shall" i to "ray". Seconaed by Mr. Claiborne. Mr. Morris said he was concerned about what criteria would be used If regulations say "may". Ms. Brock said she could see people coming to the Commission arguing, that she agreed it would be a problem. ?1r. Holt said he does not like marginal access. Mr. Holt withdrew his rotion and Mr. Claiborne withdrew his second. Mr. Claiborne said he does not see any reason not to have back to back drivewa s for SF-7 and larger residential lots. He said he has pro Leos with alleys or private parallel access drives. Mr. Claiborne moved to eliminate (L)(2), Article 4.05, Division 111, Driveway and Parking Lot Requirements and Design Standards, from the regulations. Motion died for lack of second. Mr. Clark said that staff would monitor this regulation, if it does not work, it can be changed. Mr. Molt roved to recommend adoption of the ordinance sub- mitted amending Articles 1.01 through and including Article 1.05 of Chop ter IV of Article III of Appendix A (Denton Cevel- opment Code) of the Code of ordinances to provide for new and amended regulations and requirements for streets, driveways, parking lots and sidewalks; repealing Articles 1.17 and 1.18 of Appendix d; providing for a severe Dllity clause- providing a penalty in the maximum amount of $500.00 for violations thereof; and providin for an effective date with the excep- tion of (3) Medians, rtlcle 4.01, Division 11, Street and Sidewalk Requirements and Design Standards, and to accept the following alternative for that section: (1) When any development is required to provide more than one-half of any arterial street, a median shall be prorIad In accordance with the design standards. (1) All portions of the median less than eight (8) feet in width shall be Installed with a maintenance free surface of concrete or simllar material approved by the City Engineer, excluding asphalt. (3) Other portions of the medlars shall be landscaped or xeriscaped in accordance with plans approved by the City for every 1,000 square feet of median area or portion thereof not of a asintenance free surface. a tree with a trunk of three (3) inches or more in diameter, aessured st round level, shall be installed. The tree typpe used sha l be from an approved list maintained by the Parks and Recreation Department. Seconded by Ms. Brock and carried (1.1), hr. Claiborne voted no stating that he was unable to support Division 111, Article I.OS, ID) Access to Collector Streets. r .1 1 I I Iloilo IF I i i 1 j E fi I s . i E i i 1, I Ills I-Li-L., 1111 fill 44-6-1 ,i ,ar i I 14, 1 CITYot DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BU1LDINO / DENTON, TEXAS 70201 / TELEPHONE (817) 808-8307 Office of the city manspoe M E M O R A N D U M TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council ' FROM, Jennifer Walters$ City Secretary DATE; June 3, 1988 SUBJECT; Back-up for Agenda Item t 2 - 5:30 No formal back-up materials were submitted for this item. r ;I i lom .41 i ' ~ Je Ee t,Oj 1 1 r l ry %X f / j 11~I' 1 1 '0 w 1 I Y f S 1 i f 3 i i 4 V ' l0.'Od I CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MuNrcrPA1 BUILDING/ ofNToN, TEXAS 78201 /TELEPHONE(817)688.830? 0111CO o/ :A@ Clly M811099r Ilk M E M O R A N D U M 1 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ` FROM: Jennifer Walters, City Secretary DATE: June 3, 1988 SUBJECT: Back-up for Agenda Item 11 - 6:00 I t. Back-up materials are being provided under separate cover. I " r Je i er w tens i 2727C/2 j 47 I 1 7 I r , V i { I I i I, I I i i i i ll~H i f P •ti Y f C11Y OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 3, 1986 The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:30 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Pro Ter McAdams; Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and Hopkins. •!k ABSENT: Mayor Stephens 1. The Council received an update on the Highway 2499 Project. i Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that a hearing was scheduled for May 16, 1966 at the State Highway Department concerning the project. Representatives from the City were urged to attend to show support for the project. Svehla then outlined the project including the funding for the project and the steps involved in the Minute Order. Mayor Stephens joined the meeting. 2. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss the following items: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Held a discussion regarding the proposed settlement in Sherrill vs. City. 2. Held a discussion regarding Hawley vs. City. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 ' V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Considered appointments to the Low/Moderate Income Housing Task Force. 2. Considered appointments to the Main Street Task Force. 3. Considered appointments to the Solid Waste blue Ribbon Committee. 4. Considered appointments to the { Beautification Task Force. S. Discussed nominations for Officers and ' Directors for NCTCOG's 1986-89 Executive Board, No official action was taken. 4 V City of Denton City Council Minutes May 3, 198b Page 1 The Council then convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. I PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tem McAdams; Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and Hopkins. V ABSENT: None Item 12 was moved ahead In the agenda order. 2. The Council considered approval of a resolution of appreciation for Paul Reed. f The following resolution was considered: i RESOLUTION IN APPRECIATION OF ' "PAUL REED" WHEREAS, Paul Reed is retiring after 29 years of dedicated service to the City of Denton since his employment on July 13, 1956; and 1 I WHEREAS, during his career with the City, Paul Reed has consistently maintained an attitude of cooperation with and dedication to the stated goals of the Fire Department of the City of Denton; and WHEREAS, Paul Reed has exhibited outstanding expertise, dedicating much time and effort in assisting with the work of the Fire Department and has shown great spirit In encouraging community involvement in the best interests of the citizens of Denton; and ` WHEREAS, Paul Reed has always served above and beyond the mere efficient discharge of his duties and has responded to his duties in a loyal, trustworthy and extremely faithful manner, in a spirit of cooperation with his fellow employees, and In the best Interests of the citizens of the community; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of DENTON: that the sincere and warm appreciation of the City Council be formally conveyed to Paul Reed in a permanent manner by spreading this Resolution upon the official minutes of the City Council and forwarding to him a true copy hereof, i V ~ e r City of Denton City Council Minutes May 3, 1968 Page 3 PASSED AND APPROVED this 3rd day of May, 1968. i RAY S E , MAYOR j ATTEST: i JENNIFER W ALTERS, SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: x ; DEBRA ADAMI D 0 , CITY ATTORNEY McAdams motion, Alexander second to approve the resolution. On roll call vote, McAdams "a e," Alexander "ayeHopkins "a e," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye,' Boyd "ayeand Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. Chief Reed thanked the Council for the resolution of appreciation. The Mayor presented the following proclamations: A. Better Hearing and Speech Month B. National Drinking Water Week The Council returned to the regular agenda order, 1. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the regular meetings of April S, 1968 and April 19, 1968. Council Member Ayer asked that a correction be made in the April S, 1968 meeting, Item 09 stated that a motion to reconsider had been made when in fact it was a request to reconsider. He asked that the minutes be corrected. Hopkins motion, Alexander second to approve the minutes as corrected. Motion carried unanimously, 2. Item 02 was considered earlier In the meeting. 3. The Council received a presentation by Ken Gold/Bill Fitzpatrick/Eddie Woo0ruff regarding fire fighter salaries and holiday pay. i i s ! C t i f i City of Denton City Council Minutes May 3, 1966 Page 4 Ken Gold, Fire Fighters Association, thanked City Manager Lloyd Harrell, Deputy City Manager Rick Svehla, and Fire Chief John Cook in their efforts to partially restore firefighter holiday { pay. The Association appreciated their cooperation in working with the firefighters to reduce their losses in annual salary, With their help, the firefighters were able to restore about half of the $40,000 the firefighters saved during fiscal year 1967-86. The firefighters vere ready to work with City management to find a permanent and equitable solution to the question of firefighter holidays. The Association also wanted to thank Mayor Stephens for listening to them and helping them find a solution to a very difficult issue. The Association pledged to work with City management on a meaningful increase in firefighter salaries and benefits for fiscal yearly 1988-69. Their main priority was still to get firefighter salaries up to least the area average and to try and recoup the losses they had in fiscal year 1967-66. They were willing to wait for an Octobcr solution. Mayor Stephens thanked Mr. Gold and stated that they appreciated the Association working with the members of the staff to resolve the situation so that it did not get out of hand. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that special credit went to Chief Cook and Deputy City Manager Svehla in holding very meaninggful discussions and thanked the firefighters for recognizing some monetary constraints the City had. 4. Consent Agenda Mayor Stephens asked that item 4,A.7, be pulled for special consideration. McAdams motion, Hopkins second to approve the Consent Agenda with the expectation of item 4.A.7. Motion carried unanimously. 1. Bid 19844 - Airport Sanitary Sewer 2. Bid 19645 - Congress St. Paving 6 Drainage 3. Bid 09851 - Cooling Tower Repair 4. Bid #9647 - Padmount Switchgear S. Bid #96S6 - Security Camera System 6. P,O, 064164 - General Electric Co. N / City of Denton City Council Minutes May 3, 198b Page 5 B. Tax Refunds r j 1. Consider approval of a tax refund for Laura K. Sacher - $517.45. 2. Consider approval of a tax refund for Louis L. Simpson - $906.05. 3. Consider approval of a tax refund for West American Mortgage Co./Les Robertson - $537.30 Item 4. A. 7, was considered. 7. P.O. /64105 - Advanced Control Systems Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities, stated that this item would implement a voluntary air conditioning cut-off program for businesses during the summer months when close to peak consumption. He presented the details of the program. McAdams motion, Alexander second to approve Consent Agenda Item 4.A.7. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Ordinances. A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of I contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. I The following ordinance was considered: No. 67-076 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTPI'TS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOk AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motion, Hopkins second the adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander 'aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously, B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or Improvements. i ~t I I I City of Denton City Council Minutes May 3, 1966 Page 6 The following ordinance was considered: No. b8-077 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ThE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance, On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "ayeHopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. a: The following ordinance was considered: . No. 88-078 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES: PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, 7 McAdams motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," r Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. r D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a contract between the City of Denton and the North Texas Umpires Association for officiating softball games for City leagues. The following ordinance was considered: No, 68-079 } AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE NORTH TEXAS UMPIRES ASSOCIATION FOR OFFICIATING SOFTBALL GAMES FOR CITY LEAGUES AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. { f T ~ay 1~ R V City of Denton City Council Minutes May 3, 1966 Page 7 Hopkins motion,McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carrled unanimously. 6. The Council was to approve an appointment to the building Code Board. I This item was not acted on. 7. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items: E A. Reminded Council of the hearing before the State Highway Commission in Austin on May 16, 1988. B. Reminded Council of a Special Called Meeting for ' May 10, 1988 to canvass the election results of the Council election to be held May 7, 1986, 6. There was no official action taken on Executive Session items of legal matters, real estate, personnel or board appointment. 9. New Business The following items of New Business were suggested by Council Members for future agendas: I A. Mayor Pro Tem McAdams requested more detailed cost information regarding the possible restoration of a swimming pool at TWU. 10. The Council reconvened into the Executive Session to discuss the following items: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. `t 10 Held a discussion regarding the proposed settlement in Sherrill vs. City. 1, Held a discussion regarding Hawley vs. City. 4.` B. Real Estate Under Sec, 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. J V City of Denton City Council Minutes May 3, 1955 Page b C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 Y,A,T.S, 1, Considered appointments to the Low/Moderate Income Housing Task Force, 2. Considered appointments to the Main Street Task Force, 3. Considered appointments to the Solid Waste Blue Ribbon Committee, II 4, Considered appointments to the Beautification Task Force. S. Discussed nominations for officers and Directors for NCTCOG's 1985-59 Executive Board. Tho Council reconvened into open session and took the following action: 4. Considered appointments to the Beautification Task Force, Directed that a letter be drafted requesting Mable Devereaux, Betty Shaw, Jim Render, Mike Cochran, Sam Marino, John Cooper, Bonnie Taylor and Jeanne Morrison to remain on the Task Force to complete the work begun by the original Task Force, S. Discussed nominations for Officers and Directors for NCTCOG's 1985-89 Executive Board. f Approved Mary Ann Mckenzie as citizen representative and Jim Alexander as Executive Board representative, With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:31 p.m. CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS UENNIFER-RALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 2909C i °r x ~n i N CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 10, 1956 The Council convened into the Special Called Meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tem McAdams; Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and Hopkins. ABSENT: Nona 1. The Council considered approval of a resolution approving the temporary closing a portion of North Lake Trail between Auburn and Bowling Green for the purpose of a neighborhood block party. The following resolution was considered: RESOLUTION N0. R66-030 A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING NORTH LAKE TRAIL ON MAY 22, 1968; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Jim E:nglobrecht, neighborhood representative, stated that all of the residents in the area had signed the petition except for one who was on vacation. Hoppkins motion, Alexander second to approve the resolution. On ro11 vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 2. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a contract for purchase of land for the new Ray Roberts Water Treatment Plant. i The following ordinance was considered: NO. 68-060 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT PROVIDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF kEAL PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN FROM JAMES NEBLETT AND ONEITA NEBLETT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR THE CITY'S WATER PLANT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities, stated that this was the first piece of property for the Lake Ray Roberts plant. The site included approximately 31 acres for a sale price of $40000 per acre. The Public Utilities Board recommended approval. Y I 4 A City of Denton City Council Minutes May 1U, 1966 Page 2 Council Member Hopkins asked if there might be a problem obtaining additional property in the future. Nelson replied that he did not think so. Staff was currently I in negotiations with adjacent property owners, He felt there would be no problem obtaining an additional 22 acres which would provide the approximately SO acres needed for the complete site. Alexander motion, Gorton second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "ayeHopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye"' Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton and Tippett and Gee, consulting engineers to perform a relay coordination study. The following ordinance was considered: NO, 66-d61 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND TIPPhTT AND GEE, CONSULTING ENGINEERS TO PERFORM A RELAY COORDINATION STUDY; APPROVING THE EXPENDITURE OF' FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motion, Alexander second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance canvassing the returns and declaring the results of the regular municipal election held in the City of Denton on May 7, 1988. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 68-082 AN ORDINANCE CANVASSING THE RETURNS AND DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN THE CITY OF DENTON ON MAY 7, 1968. Gorton motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. ,f i i N , City of Denton City Council Minutes May 10, 1988 Page 3 3. Adjournment Gorton motion, McAdams second to adjourn, Motion carried unanimously. The Council convened into a Special Called Meeting in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tem McAdams; Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and Hopkins. ABSENT: None 1. Oath of Office administered to newly elected Council Members, Jennifer Walters, City Secretary, administered the oath of office to the following newly elected Council Members: Mayor, Ray Stephens; Council Member Place 5, Jim Alexander; Council Member Place 6, Linnie McAdams. 2. The Counci'. held an election for a Mayor Pro Tempore. Mayor Stephens opened the floor to nominations. i Council Member Boyd nominated Council Member Hopkins. With no further nominations indicated, McAdams motion, Ayer second to close the floor to nominations. Motion carried unanimously. The Council then voted on the nomination of Jane Hopkins as Mayor Pro Tempore. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. ' Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items: A. Harrell reminded the Council about the bus trip to Austin regarding the 2499 Project. He asked for an indication of how many Council Members would like a seat reserved on the bus. 4. New Business No Council Member had an item of new business for future Council agendas. i f aj,;'rr M City of Denton City Council Minutes May 10, 1986 Page 4 5, Executive Session The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss the following: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6251-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Considered acquisition of property for wastewater treatment plant cxpansion. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 Y.A. T.S. 1. Considered appointments to the Low/Moderate Income Housing Task Force. 2. Considered appointments to the Solid Waste Blue Ribbon Committee. 3. Considered an' appointment to the Building Code Board. The Council then reconvened into open session and took the following action: Hopkins motion, McAdams second to appoint Cliff Reding to the Building Code Board. f Study Session 1. The Council held a discussion regarding the proposed amendment of Articles 4.01 through and including Article 4.06 of Chapter lY of Article III of Appendix A (Denton Development Code) of the Code of Ordinances to provide for new and amended regulations and requirements for streets, driveways, parking lots, and sidewalks. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this Item had already been to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Prior to scheduling for formal Council action, staff felt it would be helpful to have the Planning staff review the provisions in the new subdivision proposal. i Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, reviewed the new provisions of the regulations which included street classification, street N (...y of Denton City Council Minutes May 10, 1966 Page S I capacity, perimeter streets, off-site streets, medians, alley provisions, private roads, sidewalks, driveways/parking lots, and access to collector streets. After a lengthy discussion of the various provisions of the regulations, Mayor Stephens suggested another study session on the item before reviewing the actual ordinance. Gorton motion, McAdams second to adjourn. Motion carried { unanimously. FF R , MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS E JENNIFE"ALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENION, TEXAS 2914C 1 i r `j } 4 f' ~ CITY OF DENTON C;TY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 17, 19bb 7'he Council convened into the Work Session at 5:30 p.m, in the Civil hefense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Dlembers Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and McAdams. ABSENT: Mayor Stephens; Council Member Alexander 1• The Council received an update from the Finance Department regarding the use of outside agencies for current tax collections. John hlcGrane, Executtve Direc~cor for Finance, presented the possibiitty of contracting an ~,utsido agency for the collection of current taxes. this could be done in conjunction with the ~ ~ School District and the Appraisal District, The DISD had put I out proposals for the collection of taxes which included a proposal to the Appraisal District. Staff felt that it would time ostlhendeteiaprocessinghsystemh for the lcolleccion aof tthe taxes was outdated. Council Member Gorton stated that an outside agency would be a representative of the City and questioned the methods that were sometimes used by collection agencies. McGrane replied that the agency would be dealing strictly with current texas and not delinquent taxes. Council Member Ayer asked why staff Eelt an outside agency would be better than in-house. McGrane stated that staff would have to be expanded if ft were done in-house and that the data processing system for the tax collection was outdated and would have to be ungraded to continue with the process, Ayer stated that he was reluctant to relinquish one of the prime tasks of government - to collect taxes. Fie felt that government needed to be closest to that activity rather than to ' contract that activity out. 2• The Council received an update from the Main Strec!t Comm#ttee, Alan Cole, Chairman Mein Street Committee, stated that Main Street was not just for downtown business owners but for all residents. He presented the proposed boundaries of the project. He stated that the Committee was concerned that various groups may overlap activities/projects for the downtown area and that a Main Street coordinator could prevent such an overlap. x i N City of Denton City council minutes ' May 17, 1988 Page 2 Cole presented the recommendations from the Committee which Street included Coo rdinator, obudget funds proposed boundaries, the Main Street project and use excess funds from the Community Development Block Grant program for Main Street, Maor stated Pro that m Council Hopkins thanked Mr. Cole for his presentation and consideration. 3. The Council held a discussion of possible annexation of 2U.267 acres located west of fM 2161 and adjacent to Old Alton Cemetery. Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that the property was the site of a proposed mobile home park. After evaluation by the staff, it was determined that annexation was appropriate. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with annexation, q. The Council held a discussion on a request of the Denton Independent School District for annexation of 60.097 acres of land located on McKinney Street approximately 1,800 feet east of Mayhill Road, Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that Council had requested additional information regarding the cost of development in the area. Option #I, annex the school site only, was the least costly. Most of the cost for services would be picked up the the D1SD during the development process. Option 02, annexation of approximately 90 acres around the school sl0i would still be a minimal cost as most of the water and sewer costs would be picked up by the DISD during the development p.'ocess. Option I #3, annexation of approximately 1200 acres, would be the most new h utilityadlines of Stasome ff was recommending installation requiring option 12. the After annexation discussion, the Option s12f withe th the Council to drop nback to Option 01 if necessary, 5, The Council held a discussion of the 19b8 Final Statement and Reallocation of unused 1967 funds of thi Community Development Block Grant Program. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that there were two issues the staff needed direction from the Council. The first was consideration of the final Community Development Block Grant application for the next year and the second was consideration of an amendment to the 1987 program. #Y I City of Denton City Council Minutes May 17, 1966 Page 3 The consideration of the final CDGB application included a review of proposed activities and objectives for the program. Iwo new programs were being proposed - English as a language and an education assistance program. CDBG had to present the programs to the Human Resources Committee for approval before being able to use CDBG money for the projects. The amendment to the 1967 program involved determining { alternative uses for remaining CDBG money. Alternatives included using the remaining money for housing rehabilitation projects or dividing the money between housing rehabilitation and the Main Street project. Mayor Stephens joined the meeting. After discussion, consensus of the Council was to reconsider ~I the item after a pending meeting of the Community Development Block Grant Committee in case the Committee's recommendation would change. 6. The Council did not meet in the Executive Session during the Work Session. The Council convened into the regular session at 7;00 p.m, in the Council Chambers. PRESENT; Mayor Stephens; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and McAdams. ABSENT; Council Member Alexander The Mayor presented the following proclamations. A. Xaren Connor Day B. Mental Health Month Item 2, was moved ahead in the agenda order. 2. Public Hearings A. The Council heard a petition of the City of Denton requesting establishment of the Agricultural (A) zonin district on 24.3957 acres located at the northwest corner of Rector Road and 1-35 North service road and more fully described as the J. Ayers Survey, Abstract No. 2, and the B. Burleson Survey, Abstract No. 65. If approved, the property may be utilized for any use permitted under the Zoning Ordinance. 2,66.005 pt 1 I " City of Denton City Council Minutes May 17, 1966 Page 4 the Mayor opened the public hearing. ` No one spoke in favor. ` Jackson Fulgham, an area property owner, spoke in opposition. ` The property was predominately residential in nature. He l stated that agricultural zoning was being requested on property which was clearly being used as an industrial piece of roperty. He did not understand why that type of zoning was being requested when an Industrial use was already on the property which was not compatible with surrounding property. The Mayor closed the public hearing. ! Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that this was a petition !!i I of tine City of Denton for permanent zoning on the property I which was annexed into the City with a temporary Agricultural t4 zoning classification. The area was a low intensity area, ` predominately residential in nature. The Agricultural zoning f` was the most restrictive land use. Extension of City utilities to the area was not anticipated in the near future. The following ordinance was considered. NO. 66-063 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES 10 24.3957 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF RECTOR ROAD AND THE SERVICE ROAD OF INTERSTATE 3S, AS IS MORE PARTICULAkLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO PROVIDE FOR AN AGRICULTURAL "A"' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION; PkOVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN A MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.OU FOR VIOLATIONS THEkEOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. D:_Adems motion, Gorton second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "'aye," Gorton "aye,'" Ayer "aye," Boys "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas amending Article 10 ('"Specific Use Permits") of Appendix B-Zoning by repealing the time limit for which construction must begin; and providing for an effective date. L F b City of Denton City Council Minutes May 17, 19bb Page 5 The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. I The Mayor closed the public hearing. Elizabeth Evans, Planning Administrator, stated that the ordinance would delete the automatic expiration provision for Specific Use Permits. Each permit would be given a time limit or a cane by case basis. The Council would still have the option to place time limits on a permit. After considerable discussion centering around expiration dates for current permits and standard time limits for all new permits, Boyd motion, Gorton second to table the item until the next regularly scheduled meeting. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. The Council returned to item Ml. 1. The Council received a presentation by the Delta Lodge to t:te City of Dentcn Police Department. i)a id Byles, Chapter Advisor to the Delta Lodge, expressed the Lldge's appreciation to the Council and the community for their support of the Fry Street Fair. A portion of the proceeds from the lair were always donated to charity and other community causes. This year the Lodge wanted to present the City of Denton Police Department t'?th a check for $1,000 to be placed in tt.e Denton Police Department Flack Jacket Fund. 3. Consent Agenda Mayor Stephens stated that Item #3.A.6. had been pulled by staff. Gorton motion, McAdams second to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of Item it3.A.b. Motion carried unanimously. Consent Agenda A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. P.O. 19657 - Office Supplies 2. P.O. 49b62 - Cement, Concrete and Aggregate } f City of Denton City Council Minutes May 17, 1988 Page 6 3. P.O. #9664 - Traffic Control Parts 4. P.O. 19649 - Pembrooke St. 6" Waterline 5. P.O. 19853 - Peach St. Tank Painting & Repair Pulled by 6. P.O. 19641 - Purchase of Raw Water 8 Staff MGD Pump Unit 13A 7. P.O. 19810 - Oversize Water Lines - Westgate Hills North Subdivision B. Tax Refunds 1. Consider approval of a tax refund for Wadley Central Blood Bank of Denton - $1,767.73 } C. Plats and Replats 1. Consider approval of preliminary plat of the LaVilla Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, being a replat of Lots 1-6, Block 1 of the Owsley Park Addition, 'and Lots 5-8 of the Stella Lee Owsley Addition. 4. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. i The following ordinance was considered: NO. 88-064 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONIRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "ayeHopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. I Y~ i 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes May 17, 1966 Page 7 B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. The following ordinance was considered: N0. 66-065 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR ` IMPRUVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Hopkins motion, McAdams second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd aye, and Mayor Stephens "aye," Motion carried unanimously. acceptingC.compThe etitivecbids considered adoption iofor fthe award ordinance of contracts for public works or improvements. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 66-066 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution of a change order to a contract between the City of Denton and Tonto Construction and providing for an increase in the contract price. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 66-067 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE ORDER TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND TONTO CONSTRUCTION, INC, FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT PRICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, M r I I City of Denton City Council Minutes I May 17, 1968 Page b Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities ta that this plant. was a change order to the upgrading of the stater treatment McAdams motion, Hopkins second to adopt the ordinance, Bova, McAdams "aye,' Hopkins "aye," orlon " « On roll unanimously, and Mayor ph ens ayes Ayer "aye Ste "aye, Motion carried d E. The Council considered adoption of an comp the City o went for, Texas ordinance Denton and Joe a pending,litigationg a settlement and Sherrill, ET UX, g between the City of The following ordinance was considered: N0, 66-068 AN ORDINANCE SETTLEMENT OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, A?PROVING A AND LITIGATION BE TWEEN O THE MCITY OF EEMENT FOP. PENDING SHERRILL, ET UX; ANU PROVIDING FOR AN NTON AND l EFFECTIVE DATE. W Hopkins motion, Gorton second to adopt all Ye,'YOBo d McAdams "aye," Hopkins the ordinance, On roll Ca unanimously, aye' and Mayor StePhensye'~ Gorton Motion Ayer aye. on carried I F The Council considered amending Ordinance No, 67.081 to adoption of an for th specific USe provide for an ex ordinance training park for 173e permit granted therein forata date Lane, (S-191) acres of land located at 3505 Teasley The following ordinance was considered: N0. b6-069 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ORDINANCE N0. 87.061 TO PROVIDE FOR AN EXPIRATION AMENDING FOR ]HE SPECIFIC USE PE RMIT GRANTED THEREIN FOR A HORSE TRAINING PARK FOR 173,3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 3505 TEASLEY LANE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE Elizabeth Evans, Program Administrator DATE, allow for a five th year extension stated that this would granted at 3505 Teasley Lane, on e specific use permit Bapkins motion, McAdams second to aye, Hopkins ~~a eadopt the ordinance. On roll yd `aye, 11 and Mayor Stephens Goayep"'aye'r, Ayer "aye unanimously, ,n Motion carried x V I City of Denton City Council Minutes May 17, 198b Page 9 G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Black and Veatch, engineers-architects, for professional engineering services relating to the Lake Ray Roberts Hydropower Project. 1 The following ordinance was considered: j NO. b8-090 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH BLACK AND VEATCH, 1 ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS, FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATING TO THE LAKE RAY ROBERTS HYDROPOWER PROJECT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that the purpose of the agreement was to review the feasibility of the project and to prepare the turbine generator specifications. McAdams motion, Ayer second to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 5, Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution by the City of Denton, Texas, authorizing the City Manager to sin and submit an amendment to the Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds submitted June 16, 1967 i to the Department of Housing and Urban Development with appropriate verifications, as authorized and required by the h Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. I The following resolution was considered: RESOLUTION NO. R68-031 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT AN AMENDMENT TO THE FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTI4ES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS SUBMITTED JUNE 161 1987 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WITH APPROPRIATE VERIFICATIONS, AS AUTHORIZED AND REQUIRED BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this resolution only dealt with the Martin Luther King, Jr, Center change to make sure all expenditures were eligible under federal regulations. J v J ~a f t V f City of Denton City Council Minutes May 17, 1986 Page 10 Boyd motion, McAdams second to approve the resolution. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously, I B. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the City to eubmit to the Department of Housing F, i Urban Development a Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. Mayor Stephens stated that this item had been discussed during the work session and that consensus of the Council was to receive more information about the resolution before voting on its approval. F Boyd motion, Gorton second to table the item until the next regular Council meeting. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins Itaye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens aye. 11 Motion carried unanimously. R C. The Council considered approval of a resolution of the City of Denton, Texas, approving a contract with the Texas Department of Commerce to receive funding for and administer the Texas Rental Rehabilitation Program. The following resolution was considered: RESOLUTION NO. R68-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE TO RECEIVE FUNDING FOR AND ADMINISTER THE TEXAS RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE BAT E. Barbara Ross, Community Development Coordinator, stated that the resolution would accept a contract with the Texas Department of Commerce for $500,000 in rental rehabilitation funding, Boyd motion, McAdams second to approve the resolution. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered approval of a resolution accepting the report of the Blue Ribbon Task Force for the beautification of the City insofar as the same relates to the major roadways comprising entrances to the City and beautification of thc:e entranceways; designating said entranceways and providing an effective date. T City of Denton City Council Minutes May 17, 1986 Page 11 The following resolution was considered: RESOLUTION NO. R86-033 j A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING 711E REPORT OF THE BLUE RIBBON Ij TASK FORCE FOR THE BEAUTIFICATION OF THE CITY INSOFAR 1 AS THE SAME RELATES TO THE MAJOR ROADWAYS COMPRISING ENTRANCES TO THE CITY AND BEAUTIFI- CATION OF THOSE ENTRANCEWAYS; DESIGNATING SAID ENTRANCEWAYS AND I PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Boyd motion, Gorton second to approve the resolution. On roll I vote, McAdams "aye," Hopkins "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. } t 6. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items: i A. April Budget Recap - information was listed in the back-up materials for the Council. B. Reminded Council of the N'CTCOG Luncheon on June 10 if anyone were interested in attending. 7. There was no official action taken on Executive Session items of legal matters, real estate, personnel or board appointments. 6. New Business There were no items of New Business suggested by Council Members for future agendas. 9. The Council reconvened into the Executive Session to discuss the following items: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art, 6251-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Held a discussion of possible litigation concerning Maverick Aircraft. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.I.S. 4 w city of Lenton City Council Minutes May 17, 1968 Page 12 j 1. Considered appointments to the Low/Moderate ! Income Housing Task Force. 2. Considered appointments to the Solid Waste Blue Ribbon Committee. No official action was taken. ;Y { With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m. ,r t 'j CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS E CITY SECRETARY j C11Y OF DENION, TEXAS 2922C t r 4r i `I ~ra a w ~tq- y' RriU. i i'• I F ` CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 24, 19b6 The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:30 P.M. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Stephens; Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and McAdams. j ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins The Council considered adoption of an ordinance } authorizing the Director of Utilities to execute contracts with electric utility customers to reduce electrical power demand and authorizing credits on utility bills for customers who 4 execute such contracts. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 66-091 / EXECUTENCONTRACTS AUTHORIZING WITH ELTHE EC1RIC DIRECTOR CUSTOMERS T REDUCE CRE UTILITYELEB LLSAL FOR POWER CUSTOMERSDEMAND; ORIZING EXEC TEDITSUCH CONTRACTS; AND PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE, Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities, stated that the purpose of the ordinance was to reduce the City's peak demand which would hold down the City's wholesale purchase costs. McAdams motion, Ayer second to adopt the ordinance. On roll call vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye, "Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 2. The Council held a discussion regarding the proposed Landscaping and Tree Preservetion ordinance. Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning, presented a slide presentation detailing the provisions of the ordinance. The ordinance contained two major components. The first component protected trees. It prohibited clear-cutting and required a permit to cut trees. A protected tree was 10" in diameter and 12" above the ground. The tree preservation ordinance and landscaping ordinance had been combined in order to protect trees in an area of future development and incorporate those trees Into the development later. The second component of the ordinance was the landscape ordinance. The ordinance would require landscaping between the street and buildings, between the street and parking lots and within parking lots. F' 7 i N City of Denton City Council Minutes I May 24, 1986 I Page 2 Robbins t~viewed the standards for landscaping, the requirements for tree planting/tree preservation, standards for parking lot landscaping and standards for screening parking lots. Staff was suggesting an effective date of 3-6 months after passage in order to adequately educated the community regarding the specifics in the ordinance. Bill Holt, Director of Economic Development-Chamber of Commerce, expressed some concerns regarding property zoned industrial. He felt that perhaps that type of property would be better suited if it had different specifications from :operty zoned commercial or retail. He asked Council to allow him to work out different considerations for industrial versus commercial or retail toning, make comparisons with other communities and present those considerations at the next ' regular Council meeting. After discussion, it was felt that the Chamber should work with some members of Planning and Zoning and some members of the Beautification Committee to draft the issues Holt was discussing. Bill Claiborne, Chairman - Planning and Zoning Commission, stated that he felt this ordinance defined community standards. It improved the quality of life in Denton and created a balance between cost for developers and benefits for citizens. Jeanne Morrison, Chairman - Beautification Committee, stated that the Committee was ready to work with staff members on whatever changes were necessary for the ordinance. Virgil Strange, Denton Home/Apartment Builders Association, expressed some concern regarding a single standard for various uses. He stated that there were items in the ordinance that the builders did not agree with but that they could live with. 3. The Council held a discussion regarding an ordinance amending Articles 4.01 through and including Article 4.06 of Chapter IV of Article III of Appendix A (Denton Development Code) of the Code of ordinances to provide for new and amended regulations and requirements for streets, driveways, parking lots, and sidewalks; repealing Articles 4.17 and 4.16 of Appendix A. Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, addressed questions from the Council noted at the last work session. (1) Cutting sidewalks already in place for utilities • current regulations require sewer lines to extend to the property line and water lines end f i . s N i City of Denton city council minutes May 24, 1988 Page 3 at the property line. In order to place sewer lines, a sleeve the1connection. have to be Thus -installed the sidewalk ewash ins place, itowomake uld not be necessary to cut it in order to accommodate utility tines. (2) Sidewalk exemptions along State/Federal Highways staff recommended changing the wording of the ordinance in 1 order to grant a sidewalk exemption in those cases where perimeter street paving exemptions were granted, (3) Use of alternate materials in parking lots - suggestions for alternatives for paving materials would be included and required to meet the Same weigh tests for parking construction. (4) Multiple permit process for driveway/parking lot permits - no separate pe:nit would be required if all needed information was submitted in any other permit required. Double permitting would not be required. i Council held a lengthy discussion regarding driveway access on collector streets. Concerns centered on rear access versus front access, shared access versus single access. Changing classifications of streets to add a sub-collector classification was also discussed. It was suggested that staff continue working on three alternatives to access on collector streets including the suggestions' by Assistant City Attorney Joe Morris, the addition of a sub-collector classification to the street classification and roar access versus front access. 4. The Council held a discussion regarding the proposed time schedule of the Denton Development Plan. Harry Persuad, Urban Planner, stated the the neighborhood meetings had been very successful. A public hearing on the Plan was being proposed. Before that public hearing, a work session would be planned for the Council regarding the Plan. Item 10 was considered. 10. The Council met in Executive Session to discuss legal matters, real - estate, personnel and board appointments. No official action was taken. Item 6 w3s considered. 6. The Council held a discussion regarding the median design on Teasley Lane. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the State Highway Department was giving the City tho option on the median design for Teasley Lane. He presented several options to the Council with the main plans being a continuous left turn lane versus a raised median. Staff was recammending a raised median as a safer alternative to a continuous left turn lane. ~ h N t City of Denton city council Minutes May 24, 1966 Page 4 Svehla reviewed problem areas :onnected with the raised aedian with no cuts versus a raised median with one mid-block cut with a turn in both directions. Staff would work with residents and businesses in the area j regarding the raised median and report back to Council at a t later meeting. The Council returned to the regular agenda order. S. The Council held a discussion regarding the proposed solicitation ordinance. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, reviewed the provisions of the ' ordinance with Council. She stated that the formal ordinance would be placed on the June 7th agenda for Council approvil. f 7. The Council held a discussion regarding the collection k of delinquent taxes. John McGrane, Executive Director of Finance, stated that the current contract with Heard, Goggan, Blair and Williams would expire June 30, 1988. Council had the option to send out for proposals or renew the contract for one year. Staff was recommending a renewal of the contract for next year and send out for proposals for the following year. A formal recommendation would come before Council to renew the current contract at the next Council meeting. B. The Council held a discussion regarding the timing of a Utility Revenue Bond sale. John McGrane, Executive Director of Finance, stated that interest rates were rising and the sooner the bonds could be sold, the better it would be for the City. He stated that staff was recommending beginning the process for the bond sale at the June 7th Council meeting, 9. The Council held a discussion regarding the feasibility study of the 7WU pool. L presented to loyd Harrell, City Manager, reviewed the back-up materials Benfield, TWU, t detailing council especially lfor revitalization r of the old gym. He stated that it appeared that TWU was not interested in any type of joint venture with the City in this area and that demolition of the gym had already begun. M i 4 i City of Denton City Council Minutes May 24, 1966 Page 5 10. The Council reconvened into Executive Session to discuss the following items: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. j 1. Held a discussion on Maverick vs. City of Denton. j 2. Held a discussion on Robertson and Perez claims. € B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f Art. 6252-17 I V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art 6252-17 V.A.T.S. i 1. Considered appointments to the Lou/Moderate Income Housing Task Force. I 2. Considered appointments to the Solid Waste Blue Ribbon Committee. The Council reconvened into open session and took the following action: A. Gorton motion, Alexander second to approve the following members to the Blue Robbon Task Force for Solid Waste. Motion carried unanimously, Ivan Glasscock, Larry Luce, Todd Kerr, Matt Gohlke, Richard Edyvean, Ralph Morrison, George Gilkeson, Jim t Stone, Ray Stephens, B. Ayer motion, McAdams second to approve the following members to the Low/Moderate Income Housing Task Force. Motion carried unanimously, Mariella Cornell, Isabell Miller, Deborah Darley, Phil Shea, Lucy Campbell, Reginald Logan, Harry Down, Paul Ephraim. Formal resolutions would be presented at the June 7, 1988 J Council meeting for adoption. 1 With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:54 p.m. RAY TEP ENS-, 4AYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER "W , CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS 2924C k 1 I ' I ~ l 1 [Ilia I e 4 i 4 DATE: 06/07/88 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT T0, Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR Z-1855 RECOMMQNDATION: } Planning end Zoning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 2 at its April 13, 1988 meeting. SUMMARY: The detailed plan, if approved, would permit the development of a restaurant. The land use is compatible with the high intensity area policies. The detailed plan conforms with the requirements of the planned development ordinance. BACKGROUND: i The property is a part of planned 4evelopment-6 approved in 1969 for { retail, multi-family and residential land uses. t PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GRGUPS AFFECTED: Seven (7) property owners within two-hundred (200) feet were notified. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact has been determined at this time. ResplVHlay eu Prepared by: Lloyd rrell City Manager Cecile Carson Urban Plann^r App v a.. sn H. 9,ibbins E Executive Director for Planning %nd i9velopment 22978/1 : e 1 1 1 DENTON PLANNING R£COMMENDATION COMMISSION To: city council case No.: 2-1855 Meeting Date: June 7, 1988 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Burger Burger Street, Inc. p, 0. Box 790845 Dallas, TX 75379 tus of Applicant: Owner ed Action: Approval of a detailed plan and planned development (PD) district for a restaurant. and S12e: A site approximately 0.294 acres located approximately 130 feet f northwest of the intersection of Loop 288 and I-35 service road. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - PD-6, retail and restaurant, and Golden Triangle Mall south - 1-35 1 East - PD-6 and commercial y ` West - PD-6 i I ' SPECIAL Denton Development Guide: Nigh intensity area INFORMATI NO Transportation: Property has frontage on 1-35 service road but access will be provided by existing driveway. } Existing 8" water line along service es: visewer ce. line will Utiliti road rovide and adequate sanitary p No drainage improvements are ` Drainages necessary, , ` r_--------- j J I (Case Z-1855) Page Two i i HISTORY A portion of this property is located in a planned development (PD-6) approved in 1969 for retail, multi-family and residential land uses. ANALYSIS The property is located in a high intensity area which contains a variety of land uses. According to the Denton Development Guide, the high intensity areas do not have an intensity standard. The site is located in an area of PD-6 designated for retail land use and in a commercial zoning district. Planned Devel- opment-6 contained a condition requiring a 50 foot building ! E setback. The proposed site plan meets the conditions. j j The site plan meets all requirements of the planned development check list, including an extensive landscape plan. The land use s is compatible with the existing uses in the area. RECOMMENDATION Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of Z-1855. ALTERNATIVES M t If 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with conditions 3. Deny petition ATTACHMENTS F 1. Location Map 2. Detailed Plan I 3. Landscape Plan 4. Development Standards 5. Reply Form Total 6. Mailing List 7. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of April 130 1988 ) 0754e V N FGOLDEN E ADDITION J X1)5-~ 4 I ` ~e J 1.. O"' 252.{{ 200.56 !i.)6' 2072' -Y Wend, OOQ 12 • Nei J ' ti GO t I 0 b Z•185► 1 w r P a 4 _ S S 7 06'00"E s 2B% 90 L, ` y~' e C. Cill L1. .4G' [e •xnikrY~s>hif-~ ~ ~L. ;r f G 1 ` ~q~ t Y (TTp ~ i S° S~e9 FB1MCusTJIlI6CI .rlt {FAf.n( .o 1 ~"„FIB rrs r ~`6 1 t!~ ~ ,o wsrv++J y,~aa1~ • x,J Is ~ . ,.y o ~ . • a P . r`••' ~ ~ , Iti to'' tiw rrlarl UrJ ' a t ~ cuw~ ¢ • Y ~ ~ Null %V ,d tww 9 er LA J s y To T1N6Gl~y_• l ~ y~ _ ~ I I Z 7I R L.~.NDSC1ANi LOT I L T VFW of iyl n s , a 6yyt Crff4AI~ k I ..a.d~ ' ; ; T• ~ ,~c ~ 1,' ~ t, N q p QF J Y s.NNS i{ ♦ _ . a el •.!,a~1 ! , p 4T Y 'Flr►:w t I`' COW. t X _ :+wl 1 parr4.b1F Jill. + z --=ti - N.TIR1 _ _ t I~1 t.},CQJ'.~~ i~ '•I _ • 1 ~ i'b5 FIroMAd6 FOMCf'e ir-- - ~ - • LEGEND 2.1-1 SITE PLAN • PIANO O • J ar.n I.Fn. 1.F 11 riftews runt 1Ak[ ■n sa,n a then 1CNLer 1'r N'•N' NC4}Ir1 llMl ntnrt. an Ilan lam Itp11P1 rt. U worw 1 I MINIM CM ruv: _ 11011111,11 1!'0M 61III w0LI wrin pl 1.1Ytti aIIM kIM M'lY T:ON f10. f • tl: Intn I,F o tl.trraru III-1 L A-L 1 ~ Un~a 1p11D• w r ..R„t ty N Nv n.le hr~ ltro a 2.1 urlpi ltaual tm NII 1r0o1Y V 14N hI~ C?IfTiYILfI~N r Irws,war to ntne nmlma w , . i f _ do 4 h~~ Lc- ~i I i LM. PAK f~ En 'f LL f4 C Ppr-I MO o ■ Ir7 -1 f !Oll • 46 . i ~ a ~ ' ♦ Ta.r• , , r L1v VAO- ~ T~"LNaoa~ ~ r 1 a, . 2.5-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN , R c IG-ltLP4fiM,4t1644JO SIPO61 4 $CALL V IV-0, {p 5tA50NA~.CGI.OQ 16AL. D11f• N430,01NA CID'OG 4GcL.'ugpNNMTNepwl~iD'x ~ °SOeAl,L001%"PH0.Lr~ID"K. 2m,5i w++•« "yGM.PHOt'LulA L~ 3eiee ! 7~C►yftf 14t RAF SP6Clt5 J .i i 4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CONCEPT PLAN DETAILED PLAN t 1. Statement of Intent of Owner: rnn%t Ynrt. and a prate np!',.dTive-thrit rpetaurant ~ 2. Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Development Guide. Rpctanrant ripvplniment is rancietent "ilh negitnn neyelommnut Rnidp nnliripc for the retail -rnmmprrin1 hiv~yntoncify nrpn 3. Total Number of Acres in Proposed Districts 0.244 orrE+e 4. Land Uses and Total Nunber of Acres in Each Parcel or Tracts Total Proposed Acreage a. Single Family Detached b. Single Family Attached Itownhouses, cluster, etc.) i ce Attached Patio/Garden/Zero Lot Line j de Duplex e. Multi-Family f. Office g. Neighborhood Service h, General Retail .294 acrec to Commercial Light industrial ke Heavy Industrial 1. Other (specify) !I t 4 4 F+ , I - n Development Standards a Page 2 S. Off-Site information - adjacent or surrounding land uses, zoning, streets, ( drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements. (Shown on concept or detailed plan,) b. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots, loading areas, access points. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) 1 I r Projected Traffic Generation. (Based on traffic study, if required.) 7. Buildings a. Approximate location. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) to Maximum heights c. Minimum setbacka: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) d. Maximum gross floor area (square feet) for nonresidential: 1150 s.f_ { S. Residential Subdivisions a, Number of units per acre (density): b, Number and location of lots: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) 11 co Minimum size, width and depth of lotes (Shown on concept or detailed plan,) 'I l d. Minimum front, side and rear yard setbackes (Shown on concept or detailed plan,) 1 ~h .1 Development Standards P page 3 water and Drainage - approximate location of all existing or proposed creeks, r major drainage facilities other wale[ retention o ponds, lakes, floodplains, and improvements- (Shown on concept or detailed plan-) 10. Utilities - location of all major sewer, water or electrical lines and facilities. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) t from ground level- 11. Location of trees 3 in diameter - six (6) fee (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) 12. Open Space - location and size of greenbelts, parka, common and recrea,:.inal areas. (Shown on concept ~or~ detailed plan.) r - location, type and size of all fences, berms or screening features- I 1;, Screening - 1 (Shown on concept or detailedp~lan~) 1 ~ef r t o deta i 1 ed_ zyys~.y~a_-^----------= date detailed plan will ~ lan) - showing specific 1 14- Development Schedule (concept p onstruction and complete construction, and late cf be submitted, dote to start c development. All dates should indicate month and year- Start ~onctrurtinn 2c ;ignn a nnceihle ADDITIONAL RLpUIREMENTS FOR A DETAILED PLAN 15. Landscaping Plan - major features and types of landscaping to be used. - ~i i r 1 i s 1 q I Development Standards Page 4 16. Signs - show location, type and cize on detailed plan; otherwise, signs mist conform to Article 17 of the Zoning Ordinance. E 17. Sidewalks. (Shown on detailed plan.) } r: 18. All information required for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A (Denton Development Code) of the Code of Ordinances. (A separate plat is required.) 19. Development schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of construction and the rate of development. All dates should indicate )nth and year. ` -r _Rc.Fer f0 n~,.~gtinn Bid d' r, T ,.M 1 , ab 3/87 y i~ } a r ;i R ~ ~Ir I r PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-1855 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED II i - None Receiwd Wen-Den, Inc, P.O. Box 2935 Denton, TX McGuire Fin.Mgmt.,Inc. dba Colter's BBQ 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd. Suite 1200 Dallas, TX i i I ' .1 a j r r 1 i F. e i y *r(r ' i 1 0. Il J r 1 ' ft `s i3sT ~ ~ pp 4 r LLB --Tk(-Xpr Wit Q.~o Aw~ 0'~p 60'L G ~538v ✓ s m All ` y 5 .2 MA NN Vol f3ot & *)Lo s C-~ i tau{. w ~+A ~ ~ 0 4 t Minutes Planning and 2oninl Commission April 11, 1988 The regular meeting of the Planning end Zoning Commission of the City of Lenton, lexms was held on %odnesdiy, Appril 1J, Sill, at St00 p.■., In the Council Chamber of the Municfpa[ Building. I` Present: Bill Claiborne, Euline Brock, Ruby Cole, Ivan Glasscock, Judd halt, xilliam gammon and Etha Klker Absent: None I f Present from Stafft Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Cecile Carson, Urban P L nner; EnglneerisLeesAllison,CSeniortCfyfliEnglneer! aRenee/Biker, Civil Engineer; and Audrey Bachman and Donr.a baker, Secretaries Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order. I, MINUTES: Ms. Brock moved to approve the minutes of the regur-ar meeting of February 2e, 1981, Seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (6-0 II. CONSENT AGENDA: It was moved by M(; Claiborne, seconded by a. roc an unanimously carried r 0) to approve the consent agenda as followss A. Recommend appproval of preliminary plat of the Beamer Additfop Lot 1, black A. B. Approval of preliminary and final Cat of the C.M. Bettl Addition, Lot 1, Block P, C. Apptuval of final Clit of the North Lakes Fire Station Addition, fat 1, Block 1. D. Recommend approval of preliminary ple• of the Jane Marshall School Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, E. Recommend approval of preliminary plat of the Ward Addition, Lot 1, !lock A, Mr. Glasscock arrived at the meetins. Ill. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 2-II$S. Petition of Burger Street, Inc. requesting app p? alai of I detailed pion end planned development Q D) district for 0.$61 acres currently toned commercial and planned development (PD-6). The property is located approximately 130 feet northwest of the intersection of Loop 211 and I-JSE service road and is shown in the John W, McGowan Survey, Abstract 797, If the detailed plan and planned development district are approved, the property may be used for a restaurant. Seven notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feetl no reply forms were received in favor, one was received in opposition. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carton stated that property Is toned , 1'D`1'"end raimerclsl and is located in a high intensity area as designated by the Denton Development Guide. She said high Intensity areas do not have Intensity standards, thatdentersdtha mailoIn frontsoffGr ndyei;stherefore, NO property has no direct access to the 1-35 service road. I 4 'J I F 6 Z Minutes April 13, 1968 Page 2 She said that there are adequate utilities in the area to serve the site and no drainage improvements would be necesiary. She added that restaurant use would be com- patibewith other uses exlstiny around the property, that ar, outside seating area is provided, that a landscape plan is provided in conjunction with the detailed plan, and that the detailed plan meets requirements of planned development ordinance, rhalrman asked what driveway they would be using. Ms. Carson stated that access would be provided off the existing road, the Interior service rand, and made into a loop for drive-thru purposes. Chairman said that it appeared at one time that there was Sol nIt to be a divided access from I-35 service road. Ms. Carson said that there Is no information available that shows the driveway as divided access. On questlon, Ms. Carson stated that the drainage was constructed with the original development and that the proposal would not affect the drainage. i PETITIONER.: Tim Minnix, 12606 Trenton rallas, stated that e was representing the owners of Burger Street, Inc. he said that the restaurant would seat 36.45 people inside the dining room and there would be seven tables for patio dining. He said the owners would be providing landscaping. IN FAVU: None present. OppOSED: ran Patterson, Operations Manager for Colters Bar-b- , said that he was concerned about the traffic in the area, that It is vtry congested, and putting in another restaurant will add to the problem. He said that on week- ends, as well as weekdays at noon, the parking lot becomes very full and this would become worse with another restau- rant. He said thuy share the parking lot with Grandy Is at resent time and adding to that will create more problems. 1e said it would also make their business less visible for the northbound drivers on I-35. He added that It 1s already poLr for the southbound drivers to see the pole sign but the Pall will not allow them to erect a higher sign. Mr. Patterson further stated that if drainage is not on Issue, it should be, He said that there have been several occasions, after a heavy rain, when the parking lots would have water standing on them. RECOMMENDATION: ?ds. Carson stated that Burger Street did provide a par ins survey, which showed that there are enough parking spaces to meet the toning requirements. She said that the Development Review Committee had reviewed the traffic design and the drainage situation. She sald that staff feels this is an appropriate use within the current PD district and commercial tuning, that planned development ordinance allows the City to identify where buildings will be placed and how access will be provided, Staff tecom- mends approval of 2.1655. Chairman stated that ariglnal design showed this to be divided in Pass and egreat, He said a median Is Chown end he tea this driveway needs to be completed, Mr. Clark said this Is a norral driveway and since it is only right turn-in and right turn-out off service road, a divided driveway would not help much, He sold that a small center line median could be established and then widen the driveway a little. f f~ r f P 5 L Minutes April 13, 1996 V Page 3 { { Chairman asked how wide the driveway is now. MC, Minnie said that it is 34 feet. Chairman said that he had seen people swing wide during the turn and he felt a divided driveway was advisable. Mr. Clark addressed drainage koncerns stating that this is considered at the top of basin and that there are borrow ditches along the interstate which were developed in the early 1970s. Ms. Brock asked if the mall had retained control of the area and if the Commtssion had to approve every business that would go in on the outside edge of the mall's parking lot. Ms. Carson stated that the mall was reproved as a planned development and that o site plan was approved for the mall to develop in the configuration that St is in now. The present planned development ordinonre requires { all new buildings, goln into a pplanned development dis- trict, to rest the requirements Dy submitting a detailed y plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. She said that not all building locations were identified on the mall site plan. She said that since the roperty Is partially in sit; building locations have to pa approved before a building permit can be issued. Ms. Brock asked if pad sites were approved initially to allow businesses on the perimeter of the parking lots. Ms. Carson stated that in this particular area, that was correct. There were no others areas that were identified, but that others could be proposed, She said this area was identified as a future retail site. She added that any- thing not already built would require the same process to be completed. Ms, Brock sold that her major concern was the buildup of restaurants and businesses in that immediate area. She asked how this hod been approved. Ms. Carson said that the commercial areas were toned by separate property owners. She said this is the only portion of the mall area that is not included in PC-6. Mr, Bolt said that in the on inal Canned development, the only building shown was t e malQ. Ms. Carson stated that is correct. She said that the most current site plan that staff has available does not show any buildings along the perimeter, only parking for the mall. Mr. Molt asked what had been planned for this property. Ms. Carson said that this particular property had not had an identifiable use other than restaurant or retail type use, ! Ms. Brock asked if this was the first request to amend the PD or had it been amended with YendyIs. Ms. Carson stated that Yendy's was approved through the plat process. She sold that Michael's was the first request to amend the PC, and a detailed plan was submitted. REBUTTAL* Mr. Mlnnix stated that he would like to address concerns of the Commission, Chairman said that he had heard only two concernss 1) the amount of traffic in a very small area with •hree fiitly active restaurants already, and 2) the technicality about PD district versus straight toning. Si p, 1 r`1 1 11 6 I` 1 f P 6 Z Minutes April 13, 1984 Page 4 r Mr. Mlnnix stated that concerning the traffic flaw, they had worked with City and mall for about one and one-half years. He said that before they had agreed on a pltn, they had presented a • 10 different proposals to both was looked aclose reworking iaccethe concern they had ss driveway, that one to f•?S. He said they also had to work out an Internal plan. he said that regarding the impact on the area, the question is whether a restaurant is an appropriate use, They have done studies and feel it is in appropriate use. Cha! declared the public hearing closed. DEC 15101.: Ms. Brock said that she felt that with three restal.rints already there, adding another would not be an appropriate use as it would add to the congestion of tratflc and create a major problem. Mr. Holt said that he would not vote for it anywhere else in the mall but he daas not obyect to this Ian. He ■oved to rearrieddiSPi). (Mr. Claibornc indnMs. St ck~voted Glasscock 1. Z•88.006. Petition of henry Kasper requestinan amend* sent to an existing planned development district (PL-W. The property is located south of Audra Lane along the east and west sides of Bayfietd Dtive and along a portion of the south side of Brittany Drive, and is described as being a part of the M.E.P. 8 P.R.R. Company Survey, Abstract 927. It the amendment Is approved, the property may be utilized for fifty-four (SO lots for zero lot line development ari two 6,000 square toot lots for single family detached use, Eight notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feetl no reply forms were received in favor or in opposition. STA%F REPORTi Ms. Carson said that a planned developeent T73= was approved in 1584 for single family detected, duplex, and muttt•Camily restricted land uses on apprcxi• mately iS.8 acres, In 1988, a replmt of the property was approved in order that each side of a duplex could be sold separatelyy. Current proposal is to stand a 7,6 acre pot• tioi, of tAe plahned developeent for Si residential zero lot line lots with 1,200 square feet each and two single family 6,000 square foot lots, The single family detached section of the original PO is under consttuction at the ptalent time and Is not included in the pproposal, There is a duplex constructed on Lots 35A and 336 which Is also escluded trot the proposed amendment. Ms. Carson further stated that this property 1s in a low Intensity area, which is presently 51 percent under the intensity standard based on existing land use and 2 per- cent over the standard based on existing toning. The &send■*at prupos is a density of T units per acre, which will result in a slight reduction In the intensity art$ and in the planned devTresse pment. In addition to t.e reduc- tion, the property wouonly be using its proportionate share of Intensity. Tdeveloper has pproposed a use and enjoyment easement to the usable lot arts for the taro lot line lots. This would be considered a deed restriction and is not an ties that would be included in the recommendation by staff. As. Carson added that existing roads are constructed and Audra Line has been perimeter paved. She said that water and sewsr lines are provided to serve the development and electric lines are provided underground. Drainage Improve- meats were completed with the orIlinsl plat, O tch Includes a drainage flume. 1 i V I c 1 1 r 1 I I • 4 F p JUL -1 1 l-" S~ 1 4 r x I . NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM COMMERCIAL "C" TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT "PD" ZONING ` DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR 0.071 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED {l APPROXIMATELY 130 FEET NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY LOOP AND THE I-35E SERVICE ROAD, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREINI AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 69-34 TO PROVIDE FOR THE EXCLUSION OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF THAT ORDINANCE TO THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE DETAILED PLAN HEREIN APPROVED PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A DETAILED PLAN j FOR 0,294 ACRES OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ` WHEREAS, Burger Street, Inc. desires to construct and I operate a restaurant on 0.294 acres of land located approximately 130 feet northwest of the intersection of Loop 288 and 1-35) and WHEREAS, 0.071 acres of the property is currently zoned commercial and 0.223 acres is zoned planned development, and WHEREAS, Burger Street, Inc. has petitioned for rezoning of that portion of the property zoned commercial, and for approval and of a detailed plan for the entire 0.294' acres] and WHEREAS, on Aril 130 1988, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hea•tng on the petition and recommended approval thereofi and, WHEREAS, on June 7, 1988, the City Council held a public hearing on the petition, notice of which was given as provided by law] NOW, THEP.EFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSi SECTION I. That the 0.071 acres of lard described as Tract I in Ex t IA", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is changed from Commercial (C) zoning district classification to Planned Development (PD) tuning district classification under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, and that the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 19690 as an Appendix to the Code of ordinances under ordinance 69-1, as amended, is further amended to show such change in the zoning district classification of such property. SECTION 11, That Ordinance No. 69-35 is hereby amended to exclude the and described as Tracts I and 11 in Exhibit "All of 1 i I 1 E this ordinance from the application of the provisions of section 1, paragraphs numbered 1 through and including paragraph 11, of Ordinance No. 69-35. SECTION III. That pursuant to the provisions of article 11 of Appendix B - Zoning of the Code of Ordinances, the Detailed Plan designated as Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated i herein by reference, is approved for the 0.294 acres described as Tracts I and II in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, so that hereafter such land shall be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with the Detailed Plan. SECTION IV. That a copy of this ordinance shall be attac a to Or inance No. 69-35, showing the amendment herein approved. SECTION V. That the City council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereBy finds that the change in the zoning district classification herein made and the detailed plan herein approved is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things, for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION VI. That any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails t,j comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000). Each such person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violation, such person shall be punished within the limits above. SECTION VII. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (it) da y from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ter, (10) days of the date of its passage. Z-1855/Page 2 N I { PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1988. ` RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR ATTESTi JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRZTARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYE 1,.,~.. I i i t..~ I Z-1855/Page 3 i { 1 f i i i EXHIBIT "A" TRACT I FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION f BEING a 0.071 acre tract of land out of the John W, McGowan Survey, Abstract No, 7970 Denton County, Texas and being a t part of a 0,86 acre tract of land as recorded to Volume 878, r Page 874 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and being f more fully described as follower I COMMENCING, at a point at the intersection of the most Southwesterly cut back corner of the Northeasterly j right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 35-E and the Northwesterly right-of-way line of Loop 288, said point also being the most Southerly corner of said 0.86 acre tract of lands THENCE, North 56045138" West, along the Northeasterly right-of-way line of said Interstate Highway 35-E, a distance of 71.00 feet for the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tracts THENCE, North 56.45'38' West, continuing along the Northeasterly right-of-way line of said Interstate Highway 35-E, a distance of 30.79 feet to a point for corner, said point being the Southeast corner of Lot 100 Block 1 of the Replat of Golden Triangle Addition as recorded in Cabinet 0800 Page 124 of the Plat Records of Denton County, Texas THENCE, North 40432150" East, departing the Northeasterly right-of-way line of said Interstate Highway 35-E and along the Southeasterly line of said Lot 30, Block 1, a distance of 100.89 feet to a point for corners THENCE, South 57006100" East, a distance of 30.82 feet to a point for corner THENCE, South 40132150" West, a distance of 301-08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.071 acres of land, more or lose. Z-1855 i f i EXHIBIT "A" TRACT II FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION BEING a 0.223 acre tract of land out of the John W. McGowan Survey, Abstract No. 797, Denton County, Texas and being a part of Lot 10, Block 1 of the Replat of Golden Triangle Addition as recorded in Cabinet "B", Page 124 and a part of a 0.986 acre tract f land as recorded in Volume 362, Page 4231 both of which are recorded in the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas and l being more fully described as follows& COMMENCING, at a point at the intersection of the most Southwesterly cut back corner of the Northeasterly right-of-way line of Interstate Highway 35-E and the Northwesterly ! right-of-way line of Loop 2881 said point also being the most southerly corner of a 0,86 acre tract of land as recorded in Volume 878, Peg* 874 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texass THENCE, North 56445138" West, along the Northeasterly right-of-way line said Interstate Highway 35-E, a distance of 101.79 feet to an angle point for the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract, said point also being the Southeast corner of said Lot 10, Block is THENCE, North 57106100" West, continuing along the Northeasterly right-of-way line of said Interstate Highway 35-E, a distance of 88,42 feet to a paint for corner) THENCE, North 30641119" East, departing the Northeasterly right-of-way line of said Interstate Highway 35-E, a distance of 100.07 feet to a point for corners THENCE, South 57406100' East, a distance of 105.71 feet to a point in the Southeasterly line of said Lot 10, Block I for corners THENCE, South 40432150" West, along the southeasterly line of said Lot 10, Block 1, a distance of 100.89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0,223 acres of land, more or less. Z-1855 i5 k i i EXHIBIT DETAILED PLAN FOR BURGER_STREET, INC. CONSISTING OF: 1. Site Plan 11 page): 2. Landscape Plan (1 page)l and 3. Development Standards (4 pages). ;i i ,i y e ~ 1 ri 6 ! 1 z-1855 'ac F I f 1 _ ! S S7°06 E K4 04 yol6'1 'If 2819 I `y► . _ r_s J ~G to ~Wlitor+u.Or° 9 c N tarn ~'I' l 7,9 i S A I 1'lMOvi E514lrV44b CIO&. 71• 4!!.TW ~1 i? ~7~SiIN6 b `4 . th` a• 70 WttiVW 1~ v ' , ~wi~srry,ty •o r (NOW UN 79 1E R ~l.¢•foSCApMIi~ yy` tot t.p+c r. f G L IrCfHW 1lI ii t ecc s , • n vw s toe" f'' ~ - ~ t r ~ S 4 IT1' wtt)1 41 ~.~°~'1 ~~n ~'LL r'~ o<< ( b' ! t,Y a1 + p Q' f ~ f 6riN ~ ` - h` r r Ih .y1. f' I ' tp l• r AIRSillf f1f G r '~jt- i 1h I'II •SV ~ ~ ~.0° * IOn ~ h. • T~ fK~ ± 1jI c - - _ 1, - .~I,O X ~MR`_- Q --II _ca r•,~ b- 1•CrgL fLl' Ij a _e}' - T td tanaee - = 10 td 3 +'Q D R 1- = - • J -~'7F•__- _ -I.-. ._y - N'J TER -t M r l OM ftto ND46G LEGEND 2.1-1 SITE PLAN -Q ICaIEt 1'll~'y' /111 riw , V~ r/rn I,RII. LFU f'l rln MA? Plait tw air Im1 N W"aK r rrrlllrt lion IIInM • 00, ■6n 1 N l_1 10./I1a neR7tl f 1' /K Im"I wo rn■rn IN IrIY11r Mlilib %(in r m Ilrl'~ uLl IIIA. 1'4.. - 161111 • vl r WI t. l-1 11 ~tGl LE^-Fe' •t tt TM16 4.5 •.r.. o Pltl1IION\ siow t nWC./S •+IIN!~t7~ kpj~pc t..~ Irrulrs„ nt lor 1%; Oulu Ploy p"', lelcl N Mitt 1110" MR. NE.•1 ~d.ISr:t1G~IOrt IvI Ir , n i , M trlltlNr to •'•+a 4111N rrttrOr m 3 1 4~ ~s 1 KEA i , • i_. S'~.i by n: ►S'.}L •S Ilt AP j ' 1 h•~41i•14~F J ~ ~ f 4 , i L 00 2,5-9 LANDCAPE PLAN 1 ^ : : ` • u~►a rir ice' Rx« ,cox r~wWw.,~ra,rc~o+e°e. t,EASOww Genoa) t aw+a, osar• r+ao Nr o, e'a s are ,+aa+~w mwr.+eadoa CX7 POILWO Ho"-ralodr. F201v y 1 r V k 1 t DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CONCEPT PLAN DETAILED PLAN 1. Statement of Intent of Owner: Cnnstrurt anA np prate npw {hive-thrk._ rpstaiirant 'a 2. Statement Indicating Relation to Denton Development Guide: RgGtallrant dPVplnimpnt is rnneiettpnt with nAnInn navnlnzmant ' Guide Pal hips for tile rpta 41 arnmmerl h4Zh inttensitTV area 3. Total Number of Acres in Proposed Dietricts i 0,294 Orrpe { .f 4. Land Uses and Total Number of Acres in Each Parcel or Tracti { Total Proposed Acreage as Single family Detached be Single family Attached (townhouses, cluster, etc.) c. Attached Patio/Garden/fero Lot Line d. Duplex i e. Multi-family to Office i g. Neighborhood service he General Retail 0.29J arr„f+e to Commercial I Light Industrial ks Heavy Industrial 1. Other (apeclfy) w 4 I i M Development Standards Page 2 1 5. off-Site information - adjacent or surrounding land uses, zoning, streets, drainage facilities, and other existing or proposed improvements. 3 (Shown on concept or detailed plan.l 6. Traffic and Transportation - indicate existing and proposed streets, parking lots, loading areas, access points. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) E Projected Traffic Generation. (Based on traffic study, if required.) 42 7. Buildingsi A. Approximate location. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) b. Maximum heights s ISO c. Minimum setbacks: (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) SDI d. Maximum gross floor area (square feet) for nonresidential: 11 S(1 c f 8. Residential Subdivision: I a. Number of units per acre (density): f. b. Nusiber and location of lots: (Shown on concept,or detailed plan.) c. Minimum sisal width and depth of lotss (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) d. Minimum front, side and rear yard setbacks (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) i r N i Development Standards j Page 3 I f 9. slater and Drainage - approximate location of all existing or proposed creeks, i ponds, lakes, floodplains, other water retention or mayor drainage facilities and improvements, (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) I 10. Utilities - location of all major sewer, water or electrical lines and facilities (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) 11. Location of trees 3' in diameter - six (61 feet from ground level. (Shown on concept or detailed plan.) 12. open Space - location and size of greenbelts, parks, common and recreational areas. I IShovn on concept or detailed plan.) N/A 13. Screening - location, type and size of all fences, berms or screening features, (Shove on concept or detailed plan,) Rafar to dAtaiteA Aire Plan 14. Development Schedule (concept plan) - showing specific date detailed plan will be submitted, date to start construction and complete construction, and rate of development. All dates should Indicate month and year. Atnrt tnnttr,jrtinn nA tnnn n- nnteihln F' ADDITIONAL RIQUIRE)gNTS FOR A DETAILED PLAN 164 Landscaping Plan - major features and types of landscaping to be used. ' SNafar n landerana clan ' Development Standards Page 1 16. Signs - show location, type and else on detailed plan= otherwise, signs must conform to Article 17 of the zoning Ordinance. 17. Sidewalks. (Shown on detailed plan.) I 5 ' 16. All information required for preliminary plat in accordance with Appendix A. (Denton Development Code) of the Code of ordinances. (A separate plat is required.) 19. Development Schedule (detailed plan) - indicating start and completion of construction and the rate of development. All dates should indicate month and year. 11 eNn I 5 5'. t ~ S i •I r ;,5 y yi aD j 1/61 r 5 r i- W, w„~~"r k' iYr. Jr w i ORDINANCE NO. 69-34 (Continued) { And sold texts Are to b@ assessed and collected for the purposes hereirufter stipulated is follows, to wits 1 (a) For the General Fund allocation on the $100.00 valuation $16501 (b) For the Interest and Red tion Funds k on outstanding bonded ind~tadness on ` the $100.00 valuation ,8199 Total Allocation of Levy $1,50 SECTION III, of the be filed witAttheeOttiy~Secroto Shill the Couetyc pClark of Denton9e County and the State Comptroller of Public Accounts. SECTION IY. TMs ordinance shill be effective immediately upon its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this ISIS day of September, A.D., 1969. i D ATTEST: tITY'OF DEN74N, TEXAS [B1si~~cS"~ CITY OF DEN70N, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORK: ~~ITP7,TTORAET' s , ,`TEXAS ' CITY OF TOM ORDINANCE NO. 69.35 c«c AN ORDINANCE A14ENDINO THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE N0. 69.1 AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS CITY LOTS 11 AU 12 OF CITY BLOCK 2851 CITY LOTS 1, 21 3 AND i of CITY BLOCK 263 AND CITY LOT 13 OF CITY BLOCK 276/0 AS SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL TAX RAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY PLAT INCORPORATED HEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION t, That the 20MnQ ap of the City of Denton Teras, adopted January 11, 1969, is in AppMendix to the Code of Ordinantes Of tla city of Denton, Tares, under the Provisions of Ordinance No. 64.1, be, and the same is hereby amended es follows; All the hereinafter described property is hereby removed from the "A" - Agricultural District as shown on said Zoning Map, and all provisions of Ordinance No. $9.1 adopted the 11th day of January. } T~ ~1, r V 1k0 ORDINANCE NO. 69-35 (Continued) 1969, as amended, shall hereafter apply to said property as "PD" Planned Development District acccrding to, and subject to, the below i conditions and requirements, and to the plat attached hereto and made { a part hereof for all purposes, and being generally described as all that certain lot, tract or parcel of land situated in the City and County of Denton, Texas, known as City Lots 11 and 12 of City Block 2851 City Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of :ity Block 283 and City Lot 13 of [ City Block 276/0 as shown this date on the Official Tax Map of the City 1 of Denton, Texas, and being the sane property described in the ' j attached plat (located in the 1700 Block of Dallas Drive), which conditions and requirements are as follows: i~ 1. No building or other, structure shall be constructed on or across existing lot line; shown on the attached plat and an future E f replats, nor be closer than the front, side and rear yard requiroment t l ! stated In the Zoning Ordinance. The term "Lot lines" as used in . this ordinance shall mean the division lines of any shown lot or parcel of land which circumscribe an area within the attached plat. 2. Lot lines shall to changed only by resubdividing or replotting in the manner provided by the Subdivision Regulations, in Article 13.03 of Appendix A to the Code of Ordinances. 3. When a tract or parcel of land is resubdivided or replatted, any and all additional rights of way and easements which are deemed necessary by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be dedicated by the person resubdividing or replotting the land the same as if the tract or parcel were being originally subdivided, i 4. Each lot or tract shown on the attached plot shall be i limited to one structure only regardless of the use indicated on the ( plat, until same Is further platted within the deltr4atad areas shown , on the attached plat, and each such plat shall show all proposed building sites, building set back lines from each street and abutttng property, ell utility, street, alley an4 icNSs rights of way, and `F drainage ways, Upon the dedication to the City of all needed streets, r alley ways or easements to larva same, and upon the eomplatlon of the paving of all streets itutting such property, and needed to gain access thereto, is may be required by the Planning and Zoning Commission, such plat shall to filed of record along with the general plat attached hereto upon its approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. i 1 I r ~I F I i I I 101 ORDINANCE NO. 69-35 (Continued) 3 Building permits will only be Issued for those areas shown on the { detailed plat as building areas within the set back lines. S. When a tract or parcel of land is resubdivided or platted is described in the paragraph above, any and all additional rfghti of way and easements required or deemed necessary by the I~ Planning and Zoning Commission shall be dedicated by the person f essubdividing or platting same, as if the tract or parcel were being originally subdivided. 6. All provisions of Ordinance No. 69-01 (Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Denton shall apply to the property within the attached li plat to permit the zoning uses indicated thereon, by shading or fi otherwise, and no other restrictions than those found for each such use district shall apply, nor shall any other use than those permitted by j the respective tonfng district be permitted within the areas so designated { on the attached plat, and the zoning district areas so defined shall not be changed except by amendment of this ordinance. A platting or i replatting of any area shall not affect the uses permitted within the 1 respective districts shown on the attached plat. 7. All the streets, easements, alleys and rights of way indicated on the attached plat have been properly dedicated, or are now hereby dedicated, to the City of Denton, and the same are hereby accepted by said City for public purposes, 8. All streets shall be paved is required by the Planning and Zoning ConAssion prior to the issuance of any building permit, and all paving shall be done according to the specfficationi on file in the office of Community Development, and under its direct Inspection and supervision. The paring wfdth within the designated street rights of way shall be is required by the Director of Community Development, provided that the usual atandmrds for same be followed. 9. All ordinarca of the City of Denton and 1 ..s of the State of Texas shall be compiled with, and all regulations regarding I the subdividing of property ere hereby expressly made applicable hereto. 10. No building permit or certificate of occupancy will be issued until the pertinent conditions stated herein have been compiled with. 11. The following building and use restrictions shall apply r 152 i i OVINANCE NO. 69.35 (Continued) , to all lots designated for single family residential use only on j the attached plat, and same shall be included as deed restrictions { on such lots, along with any others imposed by the developer consistent I with the intent hereof, and with all applicable laws and ordinances; real provided that the following restrictions are deemed minimal only, and any greater restriction imposed by the developer shall prevail; torwit: I A. All lots in the "single family" designated area within i the attached plat shall be used for single family residential purpose 1 only, constructed upon concrete foundations, with single poreges or carports attached, and necessary outbuildings for single family use only; provided, however, that double or trMU garages may be detached from the residence but shall not be closer than 100 feet to the front lot line; b. No residential structure shall be erected or placed on any of the lots in such residential area having less than 1200 square feet of floor space, exclusive of garage and perches. c. No building shall be located nearer than eight feet to any side tot line nor nu ror than thirty-five feet from the front property line, nor nearer than 15 feet to any side street line; d. No trade, business or commercial activity shall be carried on or touted upon an lot in such designated aria, nor shalt anything be done thereon which may become an annoyance or nuisance to over residents in the same area. 'e. Water and sewerage connections shall be made at the property tine. f. No chickens, turkeys or other fowls, cow, cattle, hog or hogs, horse or horses, or any other livestock of any classification shall ever be kept or permitted on any lot or lots im such area, g. No trailer or temporary structure shall ever be placed upon any lot in such area or used as a residence in such area. h. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on the aria lot owners, their successors or th41r heirs executors, administ•ators and assigns for a period of ten years from September 23, 1969, continuing until September, 22, 19191 inclusive, at which time such covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten years unless by a vote of the majority of the then owners of the designated lots, it it agreed to change said covenants In whole or in part. 1. If any owner of a lot or lots in said designated area, or their heirs or assigns shall violate or attempt to violate any of the covenants or restrictions herein contained, then it shall be lawful for any other person owning real property in said dealpnoted area, to prosecute any procesdin s, in Saw or in equity, against such violators or attempted violators of said covenants, and to either prevent him or :hem from so doing, or to recover damages for such violations. Invalidation of any of these covenants by judgment or court order, shall in ncwl:e effect any other proviaions hereof, which shall remain so full fora and effect. The owner and/or developer of the land described In the attached plat, for and In consideration of the granting by the City Coumcll of this toning classification on the said property, does hereby bind 1l1 I 153 ORDINANCE NO. 69-35 (Continued) 1 itself, its successors, executors, administrator and assigns to fully comply with all of the above described terms and conditions for the use 1 of said lend as long as this ordinance shell remain in effect, and the i said develcpar and/or owner understands that without full and complete compliance on his part with the said terns and conditions the uses Permitted herein and hereby would otherwise be prohibited under the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Denton, and in order to secure this { amendment to the Zoning Map to make such use of the aforesaid land, does hereby covenant that it will folly and completely comply with the terns and conditions herein mentioned, that this covenant shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon itself, its heirs, successors, executors, adnln'strators and assigns, that upon breach of this i 1 covenant this Planned Development !;,.tract may, at the City Councils discretion be made null and void and thereupon sold property shall once more become subject to the regulations applicable to property in the ' "A" - Agricultural Zoning District under the terns of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Canton without an.,, right on the part of Itself, its heirs, successors, executors, administrators or assigns to continue the development of sold premises as planned. SECTION it. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such Planned Development District as in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the general xelfare ` of the City of Denton, Texas, and with reasonable consideration, among other things, for the character of the land and for its peculiar saltability, or peculiar uses and with a view to conserving the value of the homes and buildings in the vielnity, protecting human lives, And mouraginp the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the lily of Denton and its citizens. ECTIOA iI ' That be In full force and Immediately afterriItsrpassage an, approval, the required public hear. inyys having heretofore been held by the Planning and Zoning Ccmmisslon anQ the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof, PASSED AND APPROVED this the 23rd day of September, 1. D., 1969. ATTEST: CITY OF DCNTON, TEXAS CITY OF DENTOR, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO IEM FOPN: 4 F i 1 I ' Fr go frollow err, 11-u-T-T-To" f 1 nl 1 I i Q I DATE: 06/07/88 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council j FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR 2-88-001 RECOMMENDATION: t Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0 at its April 27, 1988 meeting. SUMMARY' The property consists of a 100 foot strip including tha Elm Fork of ` the Trinity River located in a low intensity area. Because of the width of the property and location, the most appropriate land use is agricultural. BACKGROUND: The City of Denton annexed the property on March 1, 1988 as part of the City's effort to control water quality. PROGRAMS DEPARTMEura nn ra0UP3 AFFECTED: Eighteen (18) notices were mailed to property owners. FISCAL IF4~ACT; No impact has been determined. Reepea y subafitt ' Prepared by: Lloyd Harrel City Manager Secils Carson Urban Planner ! Ap ed: ran H. Robbins Executive Dirsotor for Planning and Development 2297x/2 1 1 i MMM PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION j : ~i To: City Council case No.: Z-88-001 Meeting Date: June 7, 1988 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: City of Denton 115 E. McKinney Denton, TX 76201 Status of Applicant: Municipality Requested Action: Establishment of the Agricultural (A) s sE zoning district. Location and Size: 51.3085 acres located along the Elm } Fork of the Trinity River. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Agricultural land, and Lake Ray Roberts South - Vacant, agricultural land East - Vacant, agricultural land 3 West - Vacant, agricultural land a,. Denton Development Guide: Outside original boundaries, Low Intensity Area. i SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: FM 918 crosses the property and no other public roads access the property. Utilities: No city utilities, water, sewer, or electric, are located in this area. i Drainage: The property includes the Elm Fork of the Trinity River. HISTORY The City of Denton annexed the property on March 1, 1988 in order to control water quality. j i (case Z-88-ool) Page Two ANALYSIS The property is located in a low intensity area. The Predominant { land uses are agricultural and residential. Low intensity areas are the primary housing areas in the city. With a trip gener- ation factor of 30 trips per day per gross acre, the property ` would use less than its proportionate share of intensity. The site is a considerable distance from the urbanized area of the City, and municipal utility lines are not expected to be i extended in the near future. The property consists of a 100 foot strip; therefore, the most logical zoning district classification would be Agricultural (A), This land use would be consistent with the low intensity policies, RECOMMENDATION Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. I ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition _ 2, Deny petition ATTACHMENT I 1. Location Map 2, Reply Form Total 3, Mailing List 4, Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of April 27r 1988 i 1 I 1 2996g i T 3 f F R f I I 8811=1001 NORTH 0'19 e~I P + ~ y. W 1 h0 Y " r ~ Cry , • ~ P ' e0 M' i 1 FI/ Plt A~~r i yr • IJ14 o!x O~t~~~ V11 I YAKS SAr 4, S y'~-~'11~e..,r,.~. I_1I •~i~/01' ~i [I:.i 11J YrY ~~0: .~r'n ,a. Aylca I iF i r l = 1 • i !j 1 i I I 1~I 1.a, ji ju[i1 N~~! ..~C.a~'_ C~t9 T ' to 1. i~ t i7 Fjr~l IIA °1 Ih ""1f Y-i r! 7!~} My f IIJ~n7 114•.1 All. yII Mlrl =7 Sao, Woo I t W V ltli eUb / dlr ir• nH•. ~ . o/.r.. , J rlP ~ ~ F~ CYC ~ f1♦. ~ ~`r L~ 114 I. Ir w1 cn rrrr. .YrO Vt1 6 y 47 I irlF rrV 'I J P JhVfr. :°..r• • f,ll a ~r Kla lii..' Irr l j IrxY1i Ir f rYr , - Jr. ` • 101 If. 14w t 00 at of"i I ~1 •JL~]71y:7 i rl • h t l u[/u 1114 1.111 IIl4 rH f11 d1 {•M GW YLJfNI 1114 1 • u14 - y 1 ♦ 1 ! !.!.J Ilk v1." f". e of 1 Y.]Dfr '!r lfry,µ J I ,.vl V a. ! Iy~le, rlNi r 44 N ki ye1i r, .n.1.J r~rf r 'S J jN `Isle s'~~ 4 y r 1r..lY { ♦ at" A. o Y1 rll/, ♦/1V10 'iw11 y ll'1, r. ~Y Vblr P~yNryU 1111x°, ~ °I •1 t•W' IArr[lI I~ ~~lF 1,41 qvr rireN i !t IIY I r• 1114 F of I• "%'4I~ CCtk at r1 Iraq , ; r u•h r. 4 IJr r1{V ~ I ~r .fY IM M Tt7I ~~[4 11 I JM11 Mt ! Y wr y r. elar' I'.4 y •x1.41 r..fYl/.1 71 t4 w1., 1 [ I1N~! Y °14 •4 aIY °111fr MN 7 Xllr• • OII F 1 .f 1 1 !.M IwrJ• i1•pirfl Rl1, .r+T.40 el! IJ V ' 114 1 I' I, IJ 1'JI glr~.1 alla ° 04y ~l.1 4t! T'i Hx t 1 1 7 : . n. r1, 1 jir. r F J 1 ryI ii V ,w~ 1tJ Ir v 4 L : } ! ~r / •Wriilr ' t y$C ~ r 11. ~ t `J~ [J1rt 11 I //'ix.,/ F /J.. T /I♦IrIb J1r i * /'I 9' ,I, 1 J/NY 1 i'f r4 ~~'f IVV %i 1'111 DWI NJ h '1 11 y. ,11p~ Al ! 1 wJ, nan 1 II A. 7: i , x11 Yr %r~l k 1y!/ 'J1 , y u1r u,~ y ~1/.YIIr dCIC !!/rr ,Y~ir i 1 Y,1 •lx rp. Y1~. ~ f]I14 ' \ d O 1N✓On al, 7 f.FAul CCI! OLtte n 1 ! I \ ~mi PIl 4 = } to 40001 I i 4 t PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL Z-88-001 IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED Frank N. Martino etal None Received Route 2, Box 247M ` Aubrey, TX 76227 SMSR Ranch 4 P.O. Box 2306 Denton, TX 76202 s ry 'i I i~ r, •w 1 419 1 ~ ~ r I j ~r I , t 1 i`I 2. 6a• ~ ~ t ' /1~>i/~iiy ~sf t ~ 7r Z L'ii oNrq,✓,(+w //,std Q4 Frea(c!s / ire .-►`9v,~C %~f 38, Via/ fay// nrl,, hY + ~ 7sH x 7vzo/ Q~ / oY J175 ~ i ~Nt~~ Tx. 7GZo/ - is' 6s/, 910 ~ j~ 91n~brt ~ /~1rD5 . 7G?GY ~i7k"f G 1rtri,~ f/ ~o 0 A ?o ~ 2 _ ~nbn ~x 7Ltoz , Tim fA fl _ 1glie tL Aw Z xYi 7~r 7~Za/ 7avf 2. ~c?y..ialic H~ 1! 0 ~I Pow 0"o /Ji✓~fr,7,.1s't~s r -IMi fr,~c . R! 7 i t Ao ay/of ;k 76WI ti l~ ?j aox rid L~wfes~ Tit AMA , rrs ~4 1~ltolw raler Rf Z /-.?OX oJs -R4 7e.az7 i cr a r / newel! 4WIel 461 s/ A::&h~ty % 7!0?27 Tray /ofi/ Eiq~e F nr3 Me , 4 I hG hbrr /ZS S~~ai- Tx 762G(v ~sra~ri, TX, 76 Zo/ j 4IIIIIIIII~ 4ee 401 76y f ~f os, Raj CNIw._ A*4 i;e 44" ill 1s~s, A 7S5 S A/ 2 Moir C0440 G Sox ZO ,44 - Arho" f r 70,45 . 7G. 2 17 ?4f 141 FV//W- 4 15,141 lYOI{ 70 76 2v[i6eN 6" Leh iII 6%s Al %f~wi~5oi1 k fir/ ~j uyd~ A, ar~kuy ,M ~5 /3or /33 !I l~ , T , 76?ol r { :D r , i V Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission April 21, 1988 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, April 21, 1988, at 5:0D p.m., in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building. Preaint: Bill Claiborne, tuline Brock, Ruby Cole, Ivan Glasscock, Judd Holt, William Kamman, and Etha Kiker ASaent: None Staff Presents Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Developments Elizabeth Evans, Planning Administrators Cecile Carson, Urban Planners Joe Morrie, Assistant City Attorneys Jerry Clark, City Engineerl Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreations Joe Thompson, Acting Airport Managers Rene Baker, Civil Engineers and Donna Baker, Secretary t. MINUTE~. It was moved by Ms. Brock, seconded by Ms. Cole, and ehehr1ously carried (T-01 to approve the minuses of the joint meeting of Match 21, 1918 with the Public Utilities Board. i' It was moved by Ms. Cole, seconded by Ms. likes, and unanimously carried (1-0) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of March 210 1988. It. PUBLIC HEARINGS. h A.~ 9-00-001. Petition of City of Denton requesting establish- f Iishment of the Agricultural (A) zoning district on $1.1085 acres along the Kin fork o! the Trinity River. The rop- arty is located ir, the J. Clayton Survey, Abstract 7.211 J. Lamar Survey, Abstract 754r and M. McBride Survey, Abstract 804, If approved, the property may be utilized for any purpose allowed in the Agricultural (A) zoning district. Eighteen notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feats five reply forms were received in favor, none in opposition, and one was received in favor that was not on the mailing list, A F 1 A s Me, Carson said the property was the su act o an annexation that occurred on March It 1988. The reason for the annexation was to control water quality, in the area, Ms. Carson said that when the property en- ti tired the city, it entered in a temporary agricultural state, ! Ms, Carson said the site is a considerable distance from the urbanized area of the City, and municipal utility lines are not expected to be extended in the near future, The property consists of a 100 foot strips therefore, the most logical zoning district classification would be agricultural (A). 1 i L i V P x 1 Minutes April 27, 1988 Page 2 NO, arson continued that the property is located in a low lntt.,city area. the predominant land uses are agricultural ant residential. Low intensity areas are the primary housing areas in the city. With a trip generation factor of 70 trips per day per gross acret the property would use less than its proportionate share of intensity. The land use would be consistent with the low intensity policies. Ms. Carson added that F.M. 428 crosses the property and no other public roads access the property. Jackie Fuller, Rt. 2 Aubrey, asked why it was necessary to change the toning to permanent agricultural if the City has already toned it temporary agricultural, Me. Morris said that the City has the authority to control the land ` uaw. Without the procoss, there would be no control in I annexed areas. Ne added that it is also required by law. i Mr. Claiborne further explained that when an area is an- nexed into the city, It comes in with a temporary toninq classification, named a ricultural. The City is now going through the formality of making it a permanant status, IN M7^?t None Present. PO POS£Dt None Present. RECOMMENDATION[ Ms. Carson said that it was a voluntary requea-property owners to zone the annexed property. She added that staff did recommend approval. Chair declared public heating closed. DD£SISI~ONi Mr. Glasscock roved to recommend approval of 1-89-091. seconded by Mr. Holt and unanimously carried ( L- 0. ADOPTION OP AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PARKING REGU"TIONS F E SOP PPLND % D- ON N 01 THE CODE FORD - 0 proY d• Or regu- a one o1 compac par nq ePacest repealing Appendix illustrations No. 11 and 11A of Appendix 0-loningt provid- ing for a maximum penalty of $20 0 for violations thereof[ and providing tot an effective date. STAFF REPORT[ Me, Carson said that staff is recommending approve o an amendment to the toning Ordinance to create a compact parking space. This would ♦llow not more than 10 percent of the required number of Arkinq spaces to meet "compact" space requirements. She sand that standard park- ing spaces are t' x IS' and compact parking spaces are pro- posed to be 6' x 161. She added that the paving criteria would be the seine for standard and compact spaces, IN /AY Rt None Present. k QPp099Di None Present. A lady, from the acdience, asked if it would be re aired for the entire city. Ms, Carson said that it would be for any new development or rstriping of an existing parking lot. j j! i f f~ t 1 i j ~ f i i I r V NO. r Y AN ORDINANCE A14ENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, BY ORDINANCE NO. 69-1, AS AMENDED, AND AS SAID MAP APPLIES TO 51.3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ALONG THE ELM FORK OF THE TRINITY RIVER AND BEING PART OF THE J. CLAYTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT 221, THE J. LAMAR SURVEY, ABSTRACT 754, AND THE M. MCBRIDE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 804, AS IS MORE PARTICULARLY y DESCRIBED HEn,EINj TO PROVIDE FOR AN AGRICULTURAL "A" DISTRICT CLASSIFICAT4:4 AND USE DESIGNATION; PROVIDING FOR A PENAL9'Y IN A MAXIMUM ANOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND I PROVIDING 'POR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. t WHEREAS, the City of Denton has petitioned for a permanent agricultural "A" district zoning classification and use designation for 51.3 acres of land lccated along the Elm Fork of the Trinity River; and II WHEREAS, on April 27, 1988, the Planning and Zoning j Commission held a public hearing on the petition and recommended j approval thereof; and, WHEREAS, on June 7, 15880 the City Council held a public hearing on the petition at which time all interested parties were given an opp.:rtunity to be heard, notice of the time and place of the hearing having been given at least fifteen days prior to the hearing date by publication in the Denton-Rer,ord Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton! NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSr SECTION I. That the property described in Exhibit "A", attached `heieto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby designated and classified as an Agricultural "A" zoning district under the Comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, Texas SEadoptell.thehl4thhday of January, o1969,1ean and Appendix City of Denton, the Code of ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas, under Ordinance No. 69-3, as amended, is hereby further amended to show the zoning designation and classification of the described + property herein made. f i f I i ti f , SECTION That That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such designation and classification is in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of and 1 promoting the general welfare of the City other Denton, things, Texfor as$ the with reasonable consideration, among character of the district and for its peculiar suitability for particular uses, and with a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate u6c'i of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION IV. That any person who shall violate a provision of th s Ord nance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereon, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars (;2,000). Each sr.:h person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this I ordinance such tperson shall nbed~puand nished nwithin ctthe limits such I ~ above. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) day from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1988. r • a' RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR ATTEST, i JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY fi APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMi D3BRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYi V\ ►V1w... 2-88-001/Page 2 4 . r I 4 I r EXHIBIT "A" f ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lyin',, and being situated in the County of Denton, State of Texas and being ppart 4 a of the J. Clayton Survey, Abst. Nor 221, J. Lamar Survey, Abst. 1 No. 754, M. McBride Survey, Abst. No. 804 and xore fully IIII ± described 3s follows: I BEING a strip of land 100' in width and containing I approximately i1.308S acres of land more or less, said 100' strip lying 50' on each side of the centerline described below; f COMMENCING at the southeast corner of a tract of land described in a d•ed from Frank Ii. Martino et all to Richard W. Ragsdale et al, dated October 2, 1975 and recorded in Vol. 759, Page 879 of the Deed Records or Denton County, Texas, said point also lying in the middle of a channel i the Elm Fork of the Trinity f I River, said point also lyinj in the south boundary line of said f J. Clayton Survey; THENCE north 87. 41' 10" west along the south boundary line of said Ragsdale tract and the south boundary line of said survey, gassing the northeast corner of the tract described in rdinance No. 8S6197 of the present city limits and continuing for a total distance of 1,000.82' to a ppoint lying 4 469.42' east of the southwest corner of said Ragsdale tract, and In the present city limits line for corner; THENCE north 02' 18' 50" east a distance of 50.0' to the POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE south 87' 41' 10" east $0.0' north of and parallel to the south boundary line of said Ragsdale Tract and the south boundary line of satd survey to a point lying in the center line of said Elm Fork of the Trinity River', THENCE northerly along the centerline of said Elm Fork of the Trinity River, same being the east boundary line of Bali Ragsdale tract, the most boundary line of the First Tract described in a deed (too George W. Lather et ux to W. D. Hodges et uz dated January 14, 1942 and recorded in Vol. 29$, Page 182 of the D.R.D.C.T. passing the northwest corner of said Hodges First Tract, and the southwest corner of the Second Tract as described is said Nod es deeds to the northeast corner of said Ragsdale tract, and tits southeast corner of a tract described in a deed from Michael C. Ramos, Trustee to S M i R diced March 9, 1977, and recorded in Vol. 825, Page 937 of the D.R.D.C.T., for corneri THENCE northerly continuing along the centerline of said Elm Fork sage bein the east boundary line of said S M 4 A. tract, and the west ~oundary line of said Hodges Second Tract, the following 12 courses and distances, (1) north 32. 43' 16" west, 310.94'; (2) north 37' S6' 0" west, 603.S0'', (3) south 88' 22' 0" west, 316.101; (4) south 71' 06' Or' west, 268.SO'; Z-88-001 r I 4 I , EXHI131T "A" (CON'T) (g} south 79' S7' 0" west, 481.40'; (6) north 0S' S9' 0" west, 33S.80'; (7) north 46' 28' 0" east, 27..30' to a the northwest corner of said Hodges Second Tract, and the southwest corner of a tract described in a deed from C. F. Adcock recet ux orded In Perry Lee Barthold et ux dated January 241 1978 872, page 413 of the D.R.D,C.T.; L8) a north 2l' 21' 0" east, i 310.301; (9) north 04' S3' 0" east, 294.101; (10) north 13' 10' 01, west, 2S4.701 ; (11) north 44' 38' 0" west, 216.401 ; and (12) north 21' 31' D" east, 449.30' to a the northeast corner of said S M 6 R tract, said point being the southeast corner of a tract described in a deed from Sid ford et ux to Oliver A. Fields dated May 3, 1937 and recorded in Vol. 263, Page 364 of the D.R D.C.T. for corner; THENCE northerly continuing along the centerline of said creek same being the east boundary line of said Fields tract, the west boundary line of said Barthold tract, the following 4 courses and distances, (1) north 33' 30' 0" east, 870.00'; (2) north 3S' 30' 0" west, 34S.001; (3) north 07' 0' OS" east, passing the northwest corner of said Adcock tract, and the south right•of~way line of F.M. 428, passing the north right-of-way line of said F.M. 428, end the southwest corner of a tract described in a deed from Patrick D. McQueen to bill Lynch dated February 10, 1986 and recorded in Vol. 18811, Page 880 of the D.R.D.C.T. and continuing for a total distance of 430.001; and (4) north 43' 3S' 0" east, sO4.00' to the of northeast Lycorner of said nch tracts and Fields tsouthe southeast tcornert of northwest corner described In a deed to R. H. Venable from Mrs. Coaette hoodrue at al, dated October 16, 1959 and recorded In Vol. 4S0, Page 635 of the D.R.D.C.T. and the southvest corner of a 37.0 acre tract described in a deed from Nonni* Mae Cagle to Olen L. Spencer dated November 170 1952 and recorded In Vol. 3840 Page S2 of the D.R.D.C.T., said point also lying in the north boundary line of said Clayton Survey, and the south boundary line of said Lamar Survey for corner; THENCE northeasterly continuing along the center line of said Elm Fork same being the east boundary lire of said Venable Tract 6 and the west boundary line of said 37.0 acre Spencer tract, to the northwest corner of the remainder of the $7.0 acre Spencer tract, and the southwest corner of a 7.157 acre tract described in a deed from Ray T. Spencer to Olen L. Spencer dated November 10 1977 and recorded in Vol. 868, page 869 of the D.R,D.C.T. for corner; THENCE north 470 4S' 00" east continuing along the centerline of said Elm Fork sue being the west boundary line of sold 7.157 acre Spencer tract, and the east boundary line of sold Venable Tract 6, a distance of 142.33' to the northwest corner of said 7.157 acre Spencer tract, and the southwest corner of a S9.1S7 acre tract described in a deed from Gregory Brian Bond 'L-38-001 i 4 V EXHIBIT "A" (COY'T) to Olen L. Spencer dated June 19, 1980 and recorded In Vol. 1012, Page 692 of the D.R.D.C.T. for corner; THENCE northeasterly continuing along the centerline of said Elm Fork same being the vest boundary line of said S9,1S7 acre Spencer tract, and the east boundary line of said Venable Tract E 6, the following 7 courses and distances, (1) north 470 4S' east, 2S2.6S'; (2) north 800 31' east, 156.101; (3) north 490 18' east, 218.701; (4) north 630 47 east, 167,50'; (S) t north 340 30 east, 259.8'; (6) north 69o 111 east 440.801; and (7) north 666 46' 5711 east, 3SS.781 to the northwest corner of said S9.iS7 acre Spencer tract, and the 1 southea:t corner of a tract described In a deed from Reube^ r Cagle, Jr, to Radford A. Fuller et ux dated December 24, 1975 and recorded in Vol. 768, Page 913 of the D.R.D.C.T. for corner; E THENCE northeasterly continuing along the centerline of said Elm Fork same being the west boundary line of said Fuller ` tract, and the east boundary line of said Venable Tract 6, the following 11 courses and distances, (1) north $20 351 east, pAssing the northeast corner of said Venable Tract 6, and the southeast corner of Tract 3, described in said deed to R. H. i Venable, and the north boundary line of said Lamar Survey and the south boundary line of said McBride Survey,continuing along the west boundary line of said Fuller tract, and the east boundary tine of said Venable Tract 3 for a total distance of 247.271; (2) north S70 S71 east, 388.00'; (3) north 290 081 east, 321.00'; (4) north, 209.001; (S) north 170 S9' waste 424.001; (6) north 100 32' west, 209.00'; (7) north 170 331 east, 103.00' ; (8) north 800 291 east, 113.001; (9) south 720 281 east, 251.00'; (10) south 700 071 east, 223.00'; (11) south 800 401 east, 285.001; and (12) north 710 441 ` east, 224.73' to the northeast corner of said Fuller tract, and the northwest corner of a tract described in a deed from H. S. Sly, trustee to Chsrlcie H, Townson dac'sd January 13, 1986 and h recorded in Vol. 1801, Page 202 of the D.R.D.C.T. for corner; f THENCE easterly continuing along the centerline of said Elm Fork same being; the north boundary line of said Townson tract, and the south boundary line of said Yenable Tract 3, the following 9 courses aad distances, (1) north LSO 551 3011 east, 96.20 (1) north 310 461 3011 sate 187.10' s, (3) north $30 111 40' east, 141.4011 (4) north 810 47, 1011 east 339.3011 (5) north 190 40, 10" east, 134.20'; (6) south 816 471 10'1 east 339,3001 (7) north 790 401 10" east, 134.2'; (8) north 606 071 301, east$ 363,101; and (9) north 480 4S1 4011 east, 226.40' to the northerly northwest corner of said Townson tract, and the southwest corner of a tract described in a deed from L.A. Beaty to 0.0. Beaty dated February 18, 1950 and recorded in Vol. 357. Page 606 of the D.R.D.C.T. for corner 'L-88-001 EXHIBIT "A" (COY'T) THENCE northerly continuing along the centerline of said Elm Fork same being the east boundary line of said Venable Tract 86, and the west boundary 1'ne of said Be at y tract, passing the northeast corner of said Venable Tract 3, and the southeast corner of a tract described in a deed to Perman 0. Smith from Charlie May Maddin dated May 6, 19SS and recorded in Vol. 409, Page 4S2 of the D.R.D.C.T. to the northwest corner of said Beaty tract, and the southwest corner of a tract described in a deed from Daniel M. Mahoney Realtors, Inc. to D. M. Mahoney/0. S. Royalty Joint Venture dated January 301 1981 and recorded in Vol. 1058, Page 603 of the D.R.D.C.T.for corner; THENCE northerly continuing along the centerline of said Elm Fork s-to being the west boundary line of said Mahoney tract, and the east boundary line of said Smith tract, the following 9 courses and distances, (1) north 490 23' SS" west, 82.981; (2) north ISO 09' 1S" west, 149.191; (3) north 400 10' 0211 west, 243.401; (4) north 250 06, 41" west, prising the northeast corner of said Smith tract, and the southeast corner of Tract l described in a deed from John W. Porter to Eagle Farms, inc. dated Jily 19, 1979 and recorded in Vol. 963, Page 734 of the D.R.D.C.T, and continuing for a total distance of 162.39', (S) north 140 341 26" east 1S0.4i1'; (6) north 210 Sand 18" east, 200.41'; (7) north Bab 471 59" east, $25,11, and (8) north 610 07 13" east, 254.611; and (9) north 334 to point in 44.45f t 31 northwe1st eacorner2.of1 saida Maho eylytract3 fort the southPooint of Termination. { 20S1a i 3 Z-88-001 } I 4 1 i i I i T t-11 11 Kill- i i f E ' Y i i 4 1 Si •r ~oZC. b DATE: 06/07/88 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager ! SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE FOR Z-88-007 RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0 at its April 13, 1988 meeting. SUMMARY: " The property is located in a low intensity area which is predomin:.tely residential and agricultural. A specific use permit for a tenporary batch plant is required on an agricultural (A) zoning district. A permit from the Texas Air Crntrol Board has been obtained and the plant has been erected on the site. The Specific Use Permit would control the time in which the plant eou13 operate at this mite. BACKGROUND: r The property was annexed in October of 1987 in order to regulate land uses in the area. A plat was submitted but was not filed. PROGRAMS, DEPARMINTS OR GROUPS A.FFZCTED: 1 Six (6) notices were mailed to property owners within 200 feet. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact has been determined. Respe 11 su mit . ' I Prepared by: Lloyd Harrell City Manager + Cecile Carson Urban Planner i APp o ed. 1 r k H. Robbins Executive Director for Planning and Development 1136k N i I 4 f PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL To: Denton City Council Case No.: Z-88-007 Meeting Date: June 7, 1988 I GENERAL INFORMATION 1 j Applicant: 1 y Duininck Brothers, Inc. P. 0. Box 1115 111 Grapevine, TX 76051 Status of Applicant: Tenant of Property Requested Action: Approval of a Specific Use Permit for a temporary batch plant and con- E struction site in an Agricultural (A) district. : Location and Size: The property is approximately 14.233 acres located at the northwest corner of Rector Road and I-35 service road. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Residential, Agricultural South - Residential, Agricultural East - I-35 Service road F West - Agricultural Denton Development Guide: Outside original boundaries, Low i I i Intensity Area y( 4 SPECIAL INFORMATION - - k i' Transportation: Property abuts Rector Road, which is partially in the city limits, and the I-35 service road, 6 Utilities: City of Denton utilities are not available at this time. Property is served by a septic tank and E water well. Draina e: g Drainage improvements are not necessary at this time. ,Y 1 yy" 2 Yi N 1 5 I (Case Z-88-007) Page Two HISTORY In June of 1987, a preliminary plat was submitted for the Rector Subdivision. In July, the Planning and Zoning Commission denied a request for a variance of perimeter street paving on Rector Road and approved the preliminary and final plats of the Rector Subdivision and deferral of the perimeter street paving costs. The plat has not been filed and staff has decided not to pursue the platting requirements, if the specific use permit is approve i by the City. The property was annexed by the City in October of 1987. ANALYSIS } The property is located in a low intensity area which is predominantly residential and agricultural. The proposed use would generate approximately 105 trips per day per gross acre in comparison with the Development Guide standard of 75 trips per day per acre. Since the property is located on I-35, few topographical changes are necessary, and the proposed use is temporary, a disproportionate share of intensity may be justified, Duininck Brothers, Inc, is currently using this 14 acre site as a construction site and maintenance yard in association with the State Highway Department construction project on I-35 from the southern boundary of Cooke County to U. S. Hwy. 77. The propert is leased from the Rector Tamill for 42 months beginning in June of 1987. Originally, the site was the proposed location of asphalt and concrete batch plants; however, the present request is for a concrete batch plant. The site violates the concentration and separation policy of 4 acres of nonresidential use separated by 1/2 mile; however, the use is temporary. Staff is concerned about setting a precedent with this site but feels that an expiration date for the specific use permit would eliminate some concerns. The property is a considerable distance from the urbanized areas of Denton and Sanger, and the zoning district is pro- posed to be Agricultural (A). Therefore, these limits should prevent similar uses from developing after the expiration of the specific use permit, a v mow (Case Z-88-007) Page Three i RECOMMENDATION i ii FPlann 71on1n mission recommends approval with the ` i rmit shall expire at the completion ction project from Highway 77 north oe County line or no later than June 1, 1991. 2. Prior to the expiration of the permit, the land shall be restored to agricultural including the removal of all materials and facilities except as otherwise pro- vided below. 3. One 60' x 80' one-story metal building, as identified on the site plan, may remain on the property after the expiration of the specific Use Permit. 4. No vehicular access, including gates and/or driveways, is allowed from this site onto Pector Road. 5. A solid screening device shall be erected or the exist- ing chain link fence shall be altered to create a solid screening device along Rector Road to substantially screen the site from the existing residences on the south side of Rector Road. ALTERNATIVES 1. :AApprove petition 2. ove petition with additional conditions 3. petition ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3, Reply Form Total 4. Mailing List 5. Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of April 13, 1988. 0756e N r Z_ -88_007 i j TO •ANGIN 1.9 Mi i ~ MONTH I i SITE f, 1llcToo mOAD l +1 i1 r t I I I ' 1 Y~ I TO DlNTON i F' 51 i WOY 'I:< JI '[tJr i l :aM .1 a,::r Y A ; I )I W. 1. 1 .[CTM u n .rr ,1 ul WI InW. u t N bd rYNtN W sll SEPTIC TANKS L Iu1pM Mm urrNt .P..r .t r w Irrr. Ln.r 4uMt 4'a °I! G '1nN [Ya•. rYY «,l MN .1rto I •tI IN N.I.INN 1(Yt y ` AND [e/IM u I4 }N 1[N L 1, wY1 t x 1r L 1. . }wtN Y•rslt Ir 0.r.NJ N wlY <.reP. .YUI I4 INIYI S ' t ; is Yw 1.1 frP d1 d lM 9tN DRAINfI[lD tWl W Wr Mrl wlYlr ...W 4 ION., t r yI[JT )61O[Y~I. W INIMIt 1« N I4 b+rl 411 YI«IW WIY I[ E/• r N\I v I-rr~ 'N Y I4 i 11 U. Y [Y .1o 1 Ix U, w 1M 4YG d wlMIY rN. IIN Ie1 III~~ ut rf I 411 Yn. II Nv_ wl . JNr A IN.14 '•Y r.i~,-' - WELL \ ico rwMlnrlr tw N.N r.mN M I4 YIr Y G wN i[YI! 1 j •r l[ Me - (Nr'!Cr W,t N GPx. :1 LIMN Y Yw1 Nn Yrl+r 4J «Y W llNr 1 y 4 rxY YY Iwl , rul+sl A rY N MI b r W rN YI LL t nuY IIY •I • t Y L / • IYeI .rM rN I4 Ar[I41[ NNH M W 4Nlr LIPIIN <[YI ,t 1 1Q 0}A. 21 µ 9K1 s..Y n ]ntN. n •IrM N w rnl LLw. . 0A. N,.1 , O4 Mrlt Y t +Y 1, l14 :w I. L • / II.Ir\I sl 111 Ir IN\ n N Yr J 1 i VO } s0 Y w.. ry... m. 4m YN N W YY1. MNIW uwu y:•:. 5 tCRKGE BLOC. METAL ,~V[1 G..[. •a r.Ix.. .,Nl.l 11 tNxr. 1.[t INII414 rLn .1. r ~ G~.i nr TAN 1 I:= d :11, n 1«I to Y YN nr NI Wm Mt NY It ".=l. o D C r Aa t a1«o nl ' J Ir• t/ fl •1 MLKI «Y W Wt I W N I4 Yw YP«I it. fit lrvw I rMNr W 1 4 rr ('3S IItIwNI 710'1 I N AI 11 I q .NY GrnN W r1YM If 1--- N11 1 t1['- ti 11r CH)Ak I N% STOCK, 1,1 FR. ROAD d 1.1.64 I«l W r I- W Of. .r P CpK0 TAKK 7 t• n I.v1e Y Gtt«. a rlrtn W Iwr. 1 .1 . n.uwt 1 RO -a ' .r aYarW 4x1... 1+NW ,7 Q P L ANT Y I K r / Il MI. L1 MttN1 CI WYtI, II MNt1 lM 1 II.r,NI /.1 V i + ENTRANCE Nil. 11 r«l 1.. bww r111wr rNnl ('i r1( pZ il~:lf f or DRIVEWAY '1 11 U M t u r ~1tM,w..e. Wt r lot. L I, BLOCK A I GATE ( n Wla 11 t.YM M \LYIN Y IN«!r `IJl 111.[Yrr y l = 7 1C. 1 TWO .1 tt..l Irrr I. w trrW N . •IrN Ixl M W 1 r, tNel«r lr I4 «.110 IIN .r w'Jr WI (P wl . w[MN, F AL `1 SIGNS 1 Ixn a I.tr..r If rlNm w I*.. Ydw YN Y YI YNTM FJa 1&0 N W I Y E f4y ti CONED AGRIC~T~ • sit OEN 1.I..N }NNY! • wlt Irrt I. YIMW Cll. N 0\'QV qf•. ^ 1 6i . ! Wu 4 0..M N .rtuNAnN 4n r1Y Y.Mx NtrllA . n•IUt Lrr +r t4 wu 1W Y lY YW M1Y WWI 1 Pill 101.5 Io" • -i IY N<r Or 161A[R r br N." 1143, NYI N INt• t 0, P0' I I •.~-!0 ~W 1 tP~ AVYGIe I.PI 41 V n lYW IWltrrl1 n rs 7. IYtY. r Mr.r N•l YI. IIN Ir1WUIIY W 4x.1 _ YRI :wt IMUtI N lE 11161 L YrTU1 P ou .:+lb t.Yll. 4 ~•y , Sa, rr.r ,N b MW 'INIY Y W IYIY W fYM W OYM rrrY-.f wl • y ww nw > S' _ ..-max' ~~~--I YI1011~.•-_ ItluWwnY O { ` 1~ S .~~J a•`I 1111] J F f r i Mo uF[~CREENiIj ~:t•~ n•f'.~ Ilr:ol Ira S ~r,/F r" _ _ .l-t -'r• 17.rao,,o \1P ~ n NOTES LONEO AGRICULTVI. NO DEFINED PARKING SPACES f 2 SLATS WOVEN INTO FENCE i $ y~ 9 I , r r ;;•w• 3 NO VTNER SIGNS PROPOSED j yns it Rnin/11t ' cwv. It Yrtor I bb 1W T n TiL.I 1Y7n~• IrIYI IV, IN N.n l~rl b1•rr NIt. G bl YI W IVY w t114 Ix 4rrrrlr■ 1. L INtY WN W 41r 4 W MfW MN. W fI tr YPr[ bC 1. tf. 6 mi. 1.0 YN MI I. Wn•.Y. I. Yn!> tM. n.I WY rrINr1M 11 W rN.ry W Iblrrrt tY YI l"w lr Y WI 4 rt«vW ILl x11 NMRN IM N I..wl 1•.1 «M.n Ln" N Wni IN .N 4 u t4 I4 uN rN tN Pyx1 IY INHMmN 14nN «NrHN~ M W 1N _ - 1111) Brtul• II.IN I~•T isia : r' 'NIV.H NM INM W. IYOI N I1PN MYI M tlN4 W Mmdulr ..1 I- Nt NNn YIIII 1:r Ml.'t 1 rf W IIt[I N D l trY1. 1 x. 1 ill'nP.9G9ufI M Iw w One, fitl_Wi:f~__Ilrl. ur.'1 -r~ {OIIP\11 A 1/{9011}1{ Y. {1[10.111/ ra.n wlu Wtr N.l. dt.r.. .r.l I O 901 101 40.r• } O1M70■ x1111 r11701 E f `.'w."Ti.inTfT ~Rt-' -Fil-~ rr rw nIN +oIMI •'n v 01~. 111.171{ .xlr.IrrrY~..eN+wlor~rn; s•«s s,. ee.,.:. ax,+.., rM'r•wa . e! PROPERTY OWNER REPLY FORMS CITY COUNCIL, 2-88-007 j IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION UNDECIDED None Received None Received l 1 Y { } i i I .S 9i i. s { i ss i+ i t r, i i 4 - a" -mss 7 ~~ipY ri5ron ~xkson F~jhbY! /LG5 ~2 „ /~5 lone Oaf (~~trrt,~n /erg Z lbx A7 I j ia9 9.~ A, .Ih?.~ftr• 7x' Z-i", 6fe~ A(f4.y 77 A• G511110&kO/ & /ivy ~lU.lrJ. 5c/>Gr~z. ~ 2 ~ 5 1. *9-- Wit ~bsrf GJ..Wr~6E _ ~4,?~_6G_. ~kn , Ze. Rarny_ 'a. Sch.w/z 4,115 4~njtr, Tx. 7GtGG _ 8, / lw/ fJaX ,~/~Itr. aLrA~7exes 7~o/tL j~ d j , f V t P 0 2 kinutes April 13, 1966 Page 7 OPPOSED: None present. Ru WiENDA71Oh: Ms, Carson said that staff recommends apprOVaL Or 4•66.OOS. Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Mr. Holt moved to recermend approval of 'Zbs-U05, Seconded by Ns. Btock ana unanimously carried (7-0). D2-66.007. Petition of Duininck brothers, Inc. requesting a pec tc Use Permit for a temporary batch plant and construction site in an Agricultural (A) district, the 0 property is approximately 14,233 acres located at the northwest corner of Rector Road and 1.35 North service road and is described as part of the B. Burleson Survey, Abstract 05, and the J. Ayers Survey, Abstract 2. Six notices were mailed to property owners within r 200 feet; no reply forms were received in favor, one was received in opposition, and one was received that was not on the mailing list. STAFF REPORT: Ms. Carson stated that in June 1967, a pre a nary plat for the Rector subdivision was submitted. 1n July, the Planning and Zoning Commission denied a re- quest for a variance of perimeter street paving on Rector Road and approved the preliminary and final plats of the Rector Subdivision and deferral of the perimeter street paving Costs. The property was annexed in October of 1967, hs. Carson said the plat has not been filed and staff has decided not to pursue the plattinj requirerents, if the specific use permit is approved by tie City. Ms. Carson added that the property is located outside the original boundaries of the Denton Development Guide a.-id { therefore Is considered a low intensity area which is t predominantly residential cr,d agricultural. the proposed use would generate approximately 105 trips per day per acre in comparison with the Development Guide standard of 75 trips per day per acre. Petitioner is requesting a disproportionate share of intensity far the property and since the propelty is located on 1-35, Eew topographical Chan as are necessary, and the proposed use is temporary, staff feels that a disproportionate share of intensity may be justified. Ms. Carson said Duininck Brothers, Inc. Is currently using the 14 acre site as a construction site and maintenance yard in association with the State Highway Department construction project on 1.35 from the southern boundary of Cooke County to U.S. Highway 77. The property is leased from the Rector (ably for 42 months beginnini in June 1967, Originally, the request was for an ssphst and concrete batch plant) however, the Texas Air Control Board recoamended that another location ba found for the of halt plant so the present request is only for a concrete plant. 4s, Carson said the 14 acre site violates the low intensity area eancentrotion and separation policy of < acres of non• eesi,tential u!e separated by 112 mite. She said there are existing retail in ata11 office type uses located to the north, She said that staff's main concern is setting a precedent with this site but feels that since the use is temporary,setting an expiration date for the sp.-ific use permit would eliminate some concerns. t ,i r f, I P 8 1 Minutes April 13, 1988 Page 8 Ms, Carson added that the property is a considerable distance from the urbanized areas of Denton and Sanger and the toning district is propposed as Agricultural (Aj, Therefore, similar uses would be prevented from develop- ing after the expiration of the specific use permit. Ms. Carson said the Texas Air Control board has issued a permit for the batch plant. 5he said that there arc a number of residences that are approximately 1,000 feet from the site but, according to Texas Air Control board j criteria, the impact on the residences 1s not considered ` before Issuing the permit. I f PETITIONER. Dick Kelsey, 303 North Carroll Boulevard, star he is representing the tenants, not the land- owner. He said that Dulninck Brothers received a contract for reconstruction of 1-35 and needed a construction site. Dulninck Brothers selected and negotiated for the site and agreed upon a maximum stay of 41 months. He said that upon completion of the pralact, the property would be returned to an agricultural use with the top soil saved. He said the only building or structure that might remain on the property would be the metal building which the Rectors y had asked to use for a hay or cattle barn. If the Rector fl family decided that they did not want the building, then it would be removed. Mr. Kelsey said that at the time Duininck Brothers leased the property, it was not in the city limits of Denton, He said they realized that they had to follow air quality con- trol standards and the requirements of the State of Texas. He said that it was their understanding that the City of Denton had no air quality requirements. Mr. lelLey said that when Duininck Brothers grlglnally applied to the Texas Air Control Board for an tsphalt and concrete plant, numerous meetings were held an_ the TACB asked them to withdraw their application for the asphalt plant, which they did, at a loss of $100,000.00, He said that Duininck brothers is presenting their application at this time for a specific use pe nit for a temporary permit with an expiration date to coincide with the construction completion and the lease. Mr, Kelsey stressed that Duininck brothers has made nu- merous agreements with the staff. They have voluntarily agreed to terminate use, they hove agreed to screen prop- arty, agreed to put an unbroken fence -along south side of property, and agreed to keep property clean, He said that there would be a gateway onto the site and that the only entry would be from the access road off 1.35. He said there will be no entry on Rector Road but if for any reason operations cause deterioration of Rector Road, Duininck brothers has agreed to repave the road. He said there are no night operations. Mr Kelsey said that Dulninck brothers has s greed to maintain communication with the City to handle any probiems that toy arise, and to do everything in their power to cooperate with the neighbors. He said that use is not outside the agricultural use in long term. He repeated that property was not in city limits when they first started using the praDergy, that this a land use hearing, not an sir quality hearing. Mr. Holt asked if site plants are placed in areas other than on the highway edge. Mr. Kelsey said that there are state laws that allow certain exemptions for concrete batch plenty which are in certain proximity to the public road that is being improved and that is one of ttr over- . ,r i iI 1 P 6 Z Minutes April 13, 1988 Page 9 riding considerations for the permit. the general policy is to locate these plants as close to the major public roads as they can rather then put them back where people live. Mi. Holt asked if they always put them along highways. Mr. Kelsey said that there is the element of transports- tion as well as the deterioration of the toad. he said that looking at Rector Road, for example, if located farther back on Rector Road, there would be a problem with truck traffic, increased noise, increased traffic, and rate increase in hauling of the materials. Chairman asked that since the property was leased before annexation of the property, how the City became involved. Mr. Kelsey said that the laity asked that Duininck Brothers 6 plat the property. Duininck Brothers then said that they were only tenants and could not plat the property. Also, during that time, the Legislature passed a new law, effec- tlve September 1, 1987, which had to do with changes in the platting process. During the platting process, the City decided that they did not wish to pursue platting the property. He said the City was concerned about legal non- conforming uses in approaches to City and based on that policy initiated annexation. He said Duininck Brothers old not oppose the annexation not the City's decision for agricultural zoning. Chairman stated that the City had an interest due to the roperty being located in the ETJ. Mr. Celsey said that is correct, however, there is no zoning power in the ETJ. Mr. lelsey added that there is platting power where the land is being subdivided, and that is the legal question. He said there are a lot of problems about powers of cities in ETJ. IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: Jackson Fulgham, P.O. Box 50776 Denton, said t'W.e is speaking on behalf of two other property owners, os well as himself. He said that contractor is exhibiting disrespect for neighborhood, examples being: 1) Ahen Rector Road bridge was closed for repair, it was stated that it would be closed for a six week period. The bridge was closed for almost four months. He said that the bridge sat, in a finished state, with the exception of the approach pads being incomplete while the contractor chose to work on another ridge. 2) The contractor regu- larly uses the restaurant driveway to turn the diesel rigs around and even on ottasion has driven a scraper through the yroporty. 1) On another piece of property ad scent to the construction, rubble from the torn down bridge was stored for three months. 1) There is already confusion with them loading and unloading cement on the property. S) There are rocls sometimes on the public toads that ■re big a rutssi ensuchethatTitrisidangerous I to drive at night. Rector Road is to bad shape and needs to be rebuilt now. 6) Night operations are occurring now. Mr. Fulgham stated that the site was not leased before ` Dulninck brothers bid on the project. He said the asphalt plant was mit put on this site because of respect for feelings of neighbors, it was moved because it was easier for contractors. Mr. Fulgbam said that he and other neighbors had brought to the attention of the planning staff that a fence and building were being constructed. He said they requested that their property be included in the city limits of their o back h doorhey didn't want tenton f a for bathe tch C pla n t in Protection to 1 i ~I! 1 t P 6 2 Minutes April 15. 1946 Page 10 Mr. Fulgham added that he understood that the TACK permit has already expired. He said Armsndo's Restaurant is not a small business, that it affects a lot of people. He said that people cannot eat on the patio because of the dust. The manager has to hose down the patio twice a day, and cannot have plants or decorations because of the dust. Mr. Fulgham said also that a neighbor, who has multipple sclerosis, has been having tremendous problems with breath- ing from the dust. Mr. Fulgham said that Duinlnck Brothers had been offered other sites, that the City of Sanger has encouraged them to accept a site which was across the street from another concrete batch plant In Sanger. This site would even be closer to Oklshoms, where the materials would be coming From. He asked that he be allowed a rebuttal. i Chairman Claiborne said that the Commission would have to decide it Mt. Ful¢haa should be allowed to make a rebuttal. He said that the Commission 'dill address that question at the time of rebuttal. Armando, owner/manager Armando's Restaurant, said that the restaurant is about 100 feet from the leased site. he said that because of the construction, he has lost money due to not belnff able to use the patio. The patio can seat between 60•b0 people. He said he wants to con- tinue the business, but is having a lot of problems from the dust. Bob Tedlock, Route 1, Box 691 Sanger, said that he owns property to the west, he said that he has a house for sale and felt there was little value on the house due to the plant site. he said that they are not maintaining cleanup on trash, thet there have been occasions when the 1 trash piles up. He said that they need an access to 1-35 _ and do not have it. He added that the roads are bad And with the big rock trucks driving down the road, it would become worse. He added that they are building a large well, And would like to know how buinfnck Brothers plans on getting rid of their wastewater. He is concerned that it ■ay be gaing into Clear Creek. Dwight Crawford, Rt. 1 Box 6918 Sanger, said that this is a nice area, that the homes range from $10,000 to $200,000 on 20 to 30 acre tracts. They raise horses, along with others in the area, He sold that adjacent properties have the best wildlife irk the area and that they could become endangered. He said he questioned environmental Impact of ! batch plant that close to Clear Creek. Hr. Crawford said that he di4 not know where the runoff waste was going, but that there is a 70.20 foot trench that has been dug next to Rector koad that runs north and south. He said it appears to his that construction of the plant is already underway. RECOMMENDATIONr Ms. Carson said $00 feet along 1.35 was annexe In August 1917 including a portion of the property. The majority of the propperty was leased before it was annexed but it was in ET J. The remaining portion of the property was annexed in October 1987, The property has been In process of evaluation for about a year. 5 It stated that a concrete batch plant permit, according to the State, was issued to the subcontractor, J and J Con- struction 'n E1 Paso, and stated that operations would begin by April of this year. She eald that, based on A conversation she had with Terri Mack of the Texas Alt Control Board, the permit tot bulninck brothers has not expired. The permit expiration date would remain in i + i I I 1 p 6 I Minutes April 13, 1988 page 11 effect unless current revisions, that are goingtAo t bbegin- e cofn nnsidopeeredt abyn otheofTACBhe o t ,baare in effect prior t hr, Mack t . Ma Mack ris ch plant on the site. anticipated that the revisions would be considered some- tine In June. Ms. Catson added that had the property been State right- of-way, there would have been no regulations or permits necessary. Ms. Carson sold that staff did receive a phone call, in October 1987, from the water commission or board. She said th-re is a stock tank located on h r is not for detention purposes but to water pdownttAetroads. Ms. Carson said that in evaluation of the proposal, staff d id not recommend asphalt pparking areas or driveways so that agriculturalnstate,lonce theespecific ouse the site erpires. Al. Carson concluded that staff recommends approval of the permit because of the temporary nature of the site. t hs. Riker asked what Buinlnck Brothers' plans were for wastewater disposal. Ms. Carson said that she ha+l no Information on that. Mr. Holt asked if the TACB monitored the amount of dust Ms. canmdohunless a very do spot visit checks, according to Mr. Mack, Chairman asked the Commissioners it they wanted to suspend the rules and allow a dual rebuttal or follow the standard procedure. d that listHsay,saHe addedhthatlIftit Istallowed this time,eothers in the future may ask for the same, Ms. Brock said that while there might be a problem re- larding all the facts, it would not be right to amend the process. She said she is concerned about establishing a precedent. Chairman stated that it is his Impression that Commission does not wish to suspend the rules and so moved. Seconded by Ms, llker and unanimously carried (7-0), Mr. Ful has asked if he could have a brief moment to con- clude hta ppresentation before the rebuttal. Mr. Claiborne asked Mr. Ful ham if he uaderstood the motion, Mr. Fulghaa said yea he did though he had asked earlier to have a moment before No. rebuttal. The Commission agreed to let Mr. Faigham conclude his presentation. Mr. Fulgham referred to the metal building mentioned yy industr ial bu ilding. Fiensaidathait is t fourcyearsycannot vbe considered as temporary. He asked that the Commission think of those who live in the area in regards to the water runoff. He said that he would like to live some theylWaysa So aattonoverrideethemopsosltion andsapprove the requests t) Require Duinkmck bothers to build the latest, state of the art, dust collector, 1) Require them to completely enclose all operations so that anything that systemefor dust enclosed, Have a wateredostock piles, slonq with barriers exceeding the piles by at least five feet, S) Require the site to be pared and a vicumn sweeper be kept at the site so that it can be swept and vacumned at all tines. .i i P 8 Z Minutes April 13, 190 Page 12 i REBUTTAL: Mr. %elsey said a TACB permit is in effect, t aat dust is from road construction, not from the plant. He said that the question of dust is responsibility of TACB, that TACB has the power to set 4dy conditions of t permit. le said if there is a water quality problem, there is a water quality board. he sold the stock pond was built to take care of the runoff. He said that }ir. Armando was caught in ■ situation life all merchants are caught when construction is going on. He said the only Issue before the Commisslon is whether this is an appropriate land use. He added that the sooner they are allowed to start, the sooner they can finish. he said all the matters mentioned have been addressed by the proper commission and/or board. killis Cuintnck, President of Dutninck Brothers, said that he understood the concerns of the people. he said that they didn't keep Rector Road out of use any longer than they had to. he said that they did not change the loco- ? 1 tion of the a halt plant for economic reasons, that they ff I had to have a ~ACB permit so they did what they had to do. He explained that Improvements In the transportation system brio abetter quality of life, that there are criteria estaglIshed and enforced by proper groups during th time of construction. Chairman asked Mr. Duininck why they did not choose to use the alternate site that was free. Mr. Duintack re lied that the site would not a:tually be free, they would have to drill wells and leave them and would not be reimbursed for them. He said everyone involved felt that it was a poor site. he added that the rock is not coming from Oklahoma. He said the closer the plant can be muted to the road, the better. Ms. Kiker asked if there was a way to control the dust. Mr. Dutninck said that the concrete botching is subcon- tracted out, since they were not in that type of business. He said that the plant had all the required provisional equipment for dust collection that the Air Quality Control Board required. He said that he felt traffic was the j single biggest cause for the dust. Chairman asked what had been done, to the property, to control the dust. Mr. Dulninek said that the road had been watered down several times a day. Chair declared the public hearing closed. DECIS20F: Chairman Claiborne said that there are legal 1 ssT mass Tnvolved. One issue, with the City, is to not create a grandfather use on the property, that the City does not want a permanent industrial type use on the property, Mr. Holt said that he understood the people's situation, but that the concrete batch plant had to be somewhere on that road. He said there would be a problem no matter where it was put, that if it was moved to amnther Inte r section, that othets would carylaln. he said if there is ` too such pollution, there should be something that the /F Texas Air Control Board could do about it. Mr. holt moved to recommend approval of Z-18.007 subject to the following conditions: 1) The specific use Permit shall expire at the com~letlon of the 1.1S construction project from Highway T north to the Cooke County line or no later tban June 1, 1991. I it 1 I t. P 6 2 Minutes April 13, 196b Page 13 2) Prior to the expiration of the perect, the land shall be restored to agricultural including the reroval of all materials and facilities except as otherwise pro- vided below. 1) One 60 f,ot x bO foot one-story metal building, as identified on the site plan, nay remaln on the property after the expiration of the Specific Use Permit. 1) No vehicular access, including gates and/or driveways, is allowed from this site onto Rector Road. S) A solid screening device shall be erected or the exist- ing chain link fence shall be altered to create a solid screening device along Rector Road to substantially screen tt:e site from the existing residences on the south side of Rector Road. Mr. Glasscock stated that he didn't like it, but the road is going to to there and the concrete is going to be needed. he said that people have concerns but he felt dust off the road is the problem. he seconded the motion end it was unanimously carried (7.0), E. PREL 1ARY ANL FINAL REPLAT OF LOTS 11 15 16 17 16, Forty-eight notices were mailed to property owners within preceding subdivision; 10 reply forms were received in favor, none in opposition and two were undecided. Nine courtesy notices were aaI ed to property owners within 200 feet, STAFF REPORT, Ms. Carson stated this 1.701 acre tract 1s locate north of Second Street and east of Bolivar Street. The property is zoned two-family (2-F) and expansion of an existlm one story classroom for church is anticipated. A replat is required because buildin would be crossin prop- erty lines. City services and facilities are avalla~la wnd the plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. Ms, Carson rdded that staff did have a question about ■ possible violation of Zoning Ordinance but has determined that the existing residences are not occupied at this time so there wo A d not be a violation. The Develorment Review Committee recommends approval. PETITONER: Brian Burke, Burke Engyineering, said that the uprpose of the replat I, to get rid of the existing lot Ilnes to allow on expansion northward. There are three or four structures on Lots 14-16. The house on the front of Lot 14 is occupied but will be vacated in August 1946. All other structures are vacant. All structures will be torn down or moved. In the meantlet. the church has agreed to remove the electrical meters from the houses to ensure that a violation of the Zonin Ordinance will not occur. He said the plat conplies witg all requirements. IN FAVOR: None present. OPPOSED: None present, Chair declared public hearing closed. DECISION: Ms. Cole moved to recommend appyroval of the pre m nary and final replat of Lots I<, l5, 16, 17, it, 19 and 20 to Lot 14R, Block 3, of the Northside Addition. Seconded by Ms. Brock and unanimously carried (7.0). ~ i N , E ~9 f 4 C 1 • 2310L i I NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, GRANTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR A TEMPORARY BATCH PLANT AND CONSTRUCTION SITE, AS SAID PERMIT APPLIES TO 15.2 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTH- WEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF RECTOR ROAD AND THE SERVICE ROAD OF I-35, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DFNTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That, pursuant to provisions of article 10 of i Appen x B- oning of the Cude of Ordinances, a specific use permit for a temporary batch plant and construction site is granted for the 15.2 acres of land located aL the northwest i corner of the intersection of Rector Road and the service road of i I-35, as is more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, SECTION II. That the property shall be developed, used, and mainta ne n accordance with the site plan shown in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated by reference, and shall be subject to the additional following colditions: 1. Purpose and Duration. This permit is granted for the 7 Purpose o~"gE`H-e property for a temporary concrete batch plant and construction site in support of the highway construction work now in progress for that portion of I-3';, beginning from Highway 77 and extending north to the Cooke County line. The permit shall expire upon completion of such highway construction work, or by June 1, 1991, whichever occurs first. 2. Access. No direct vehicular access, or improvements prov ing for such access, shall be allowed, made, or used, from the site to Rector Road. 3. Screenin . A solid screening device shall be erected an maintained on -Lhe site so as to substantially screen the site from the existing residences on the south side of Rector Road. 4. Restoration of Site. Upon completion of the highway construct on pro ect, or prior to June 11 2111;44h ich- ever first occurs, the property shall be subially restored to its prior agricultural use, by removal of the batch plant and all construction site materials, improvemenL•a, and facilities, except for the one-story metal building, as identified on the site plan. ti SECTION III. That the Zoning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, a opts the 14th day of January, 1469, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, as amended, is hereby further amended to show such permitted use. j SECTION IV. That the City Council of the City of Denton, i Texas, hereby-determines that the conditions of Appendix B-Zoning of the Code of Ordinances providing for the issuance of a specific use permit under specified conditions have been found to exist. SECTION V. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordinance, or fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued there- under, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Earth such person shall be deemed :silty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ordi- nance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any such violations such person shall he punished within the limits above. SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen ays from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988. RAY P , R ATTEST: 'fARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOViTCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: !1!2 - a i V a STATE OF TEXAS EXHIBIT "A" COUNTY OF DENTON WHEREAS, S. D, RECTOR is the owner of all that certain tract of land Situated the B. Burleson Survey Abstract Number 65 and the J. Ayers Survey Abstract Numbor 29 Denton County, Texas and being a part of the called 8;1,54 acre tract described in the Deed from S. R. Rector at ux to S, D, Rector at ux recorded in Volume 247 Page 410 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texaal the subject tt tract being more particularly described as foltowst BECINNINO for the Southwest Corner of the tract being described herein at a nail sat in the South line of the said Rector Tract in the middle of Rector Road, said nail being North 62 Degrees East a distance of 794,10 feet from the 1I reconstructed Southwest Corner of the said 88.54 acre tract! THENCE North 07 Degrees 28 Minutes 00 Seconds west leaving said road and along a I chain link fence a distance of 620.68 feet to an iron rod set at a chain link ! fence corner for the Northwest Corner of the heroin described tract! THENCE North 82 Degrees 51 Minutes 00 Seconds East along a chain link fence a distance of 891.69 feet to an iron rod set at a chain link fence corner post for an angle point in the North lire of the herein described tract! THENCE South 70 Degrees 24 Minutes 57 Seconds East continuing along said fence a distance of 293,85 feet to an iron rod set in the West line of Interstate Highway 351 THENCE with the Hest line of the said highway the following 6 courses and distancest 1.' South 24 Degrees 58 Minutes 57 Seconds Nest a distance of 120,62 feet to an iron rod sat! 2) South 04 Degrees 12 Minutes 54 Seconds East a distance of 160.00 feat to an iron rod eetl 3) South 26 Degrees 04 Minutes 05 Seconds East a distance of 134.33 feet to a wooden hig►:.ay markerl 4) South 04 Degrees 12 Minutia 54 Seconds East a distance of 20,00 feet to an iron rod set! 5) South 32 Degrees 09 Minutes 19 Seconds Nest a distance of 55,45 feat to the remains of a wooden post oat in ! concrete in the occupied North line of Rector Roadl l 6) South 10 Degrees 11 Minutes 08 Seconds East a distance 1 of 20.50 feet to a nail found in the center line of Rector Road in the apparent South line of the said Burleson Surveyl 1110C9 South 82 Degrees 00 Minutes 00 Seconds Nest with the center of Rector Road and the South line of the said Rector Tract a distance of 1086.95 feet to the PLACE Of AMINNINO and enclosing 154234 acres of land. 2- -88-007 4 1 I I I I 1 I I ~ '.a N ilYl L V, 11 "'l Ell, 44411.1 s{DhC TANKS 1 Nfa I 1 Mm1 a nl «vl .I .u 01.1 .uul. tlNl w IMA aIwIN 4 I• 1 , 1. Iwl1«I W»r 4111MI .Jrr It W IY I, ,.NI IuhN NlNrll E( 'I ,.Na:b Mur tMU h » W NIN 1 Nrl M IM N N larl IINI ~JI AL0 N IM Nr IIx 1 1 ,NIN II w 1, L 1. N,IN IY MIr 1. f.~~ / I( { DRAIN /I El D M.al 1.1 un NI I IM YN N•M. N MI. Iru..N,4 W w,W •l r-]~I i 1f[ InN NIM rr1 Im atYN YwuY1 » INlrll 4 F~ n~r•• Exist 1101- IY .1«IWrl[•YIN,4IlxlNIVNNIIW011111,11YII ~y Yyn } f ' PI II IM WI1 11M » IM NII INIY Nr1 Y lY ~lYY N IW~ i wiLl \ AO I,Y YII NIM : N DNnY tYl 1 IYNw d 14.M POOP NI IIY IN C' 4..j INWIW W INII>•t14NN ■ W MY M.Y YII IWN I• ':fr, • _J m"', 41YIr lll.1 YYIN III III., YII IM114 NN Nw W IIYI♦ u' I MII IIN INr1 IIII., a ILAI IM tl 11« NN W N 1 Nut llr x 1, I l t l l• 1 Y I. IW, 14Nf IN W 41101,11 4'1Nr N IY W,101 1.011101 IMNI 1 v1 ..,1 IQ DN t}M ~NYI 1 N II 1r11xI 1111011» NIwW,,11I .I r11 I" IIM Flow. I M .J T`R G 1,11WI rI 11111 INl 1, Y.Ir IY NI 11,1M.Ily I,YI ,NW "It to t I• tl1 1 I •QI'X ED' xN.M IUY .IM WY11YN1Y NNY W11iN11tW1 1 p w::, s T A4E 1 Mf TAL pItY1 1«u a M1rY. A IIYU. Ir INr1, rm. o WW d1V 1«I IYN. TANK . , C• AJ : i.. . l 1.u«au Y eL DO, NIuI1N, W I I NI ,I ul I 1«I II Y 11. IN NI Y W YN uY.1 JV .•I 4 II' H • t"f N Y.XI. W MII 11Y N IM III, uµ01, Y, IWr1Y , 1Nru1 w V t, l O Iu'n.Y A.I N N fl)CK, a It «..I. Ntr.n N Yuw1, 111x,1 MM I.NIW, S I I ,I FR. ROAD NINUIIrIUrN".N IGI 1 PR~`t:NV TAN. ~'NI''ly 1 r 11 ~I lr.6NIIII'Y»I!"INM W' III ,II.IIY,I O IIILAH, • . • Y11 _ / II WII II YIIYIYYYN, I/WYII aY\111,1 WI ~I , N lY11 fxl u 1 r•N NI YNNI V3 ,p~ [NTRANC[ 'yl••.X I , • ' DRI vE wAY » INN w YNw la aNw'k Y a marl N Nr.ill fill YrlrPoll rN L I, !LOCK A AT I 11 it Sillk 11 YNW N 11 Mrl YN 1 Willow Illoidt" Y 111 INI I, fli, Ir rW IY N , rr r W1 W N y; A 1 Y,7 ~O IWI,b 111",011011MII 11y N M:N YN1 li 1/1 ~~L 1, (It Y N wu a wpm It Yru, 1 POP, l mIW.. G SIGNS NY,MIM"Ir11r.I lIWlrN11W1f P`V h ZONED Awak, SITEIpEN WIr YY YIM NYIW MYIWMWYN ' S• OLICY 1.11.1, I.rN,I i Pep " ' i • I. :Mw Lt. u YNM r .u„r r wrl WI NY W ,Wow N YNN II, Ii rYl 1. 1 let 'n•L *'i 4S ,M IIYt NIN~i'i-'r WINIVIB,IY'bN'rflr WI N,MI. Poll "VNI. Iw w e of wM nlwml Nl Z61 N . s ~Ip-t. rr~11 14,i S, C 6, MM M1NW uN IN Y,u+IW 1Y wit, q,r I`~~ 5; 11 jwo.w ItNN II Y Wt I N I, 1(RII lI-t~Yl r. IrIN IMII. tYY y rr"'~• •[YI .Al.wnc IN M 1Nr, WYII. Y W NIN W Ixr« W NHN Nl•uaf•M W NMr.lI MI"«.IN. . ~•.r~~•'' _ r1 rte' .1♦ A,'4., If 11 1 yr (r +la to a••,~~AL""SCRE~I~ '1D rrlh IF, 7 r - r11r I \N0T[S I. NO D{fINEO Will SPACES •Y I y5 L 20AE0ADRICuITURL tSLATSWOV1 TO►ENCE 7 NO OTHER S* lROPOSED '...1 ~ Irl row 1 PO Pill 9, Itkill .1'TIr1 "Ifllrl • t111/1 It Irnol 1 . 1 IN. IY O H PAM N,Y,1l. Ilow r, IM YINNIrr MW VIII Y W Iw IY I'm N IF" Y, .101.111 NYNN 1. 1. Y - Y 1. M IM YNN MW 1Y1 II fill! 11:41,11. J. fY:. 1101110101 M-1. • 1W. Y W 1.011101 4a1 I'll wimi'N I, 1,1 0.4" 1.1.1 W YItillWOO Y V Y,I M .,mIN :1" ,1 frNMN IM Y &Iwl JI IO,N it IY IW 'lI I'll IY I" 1." M I" NrW W MNNNIIr WNN Mh.M. 101 YIM «101.11 NN ,NW NMIwhl Y,._v M y 41N,11Y.N IWNON 1010111, InN... 11 NNi ".11•„11 1. I N YL,I,YI „N 1M INL M.1, N ll. t..N II G'a NNI. Iu11 L`9tla".IWItY.N Mlcl t4l._Yt Y,~-..VII. '~T.'LI'n' „ tll tll+l R Al11tN111 • _ ~T~ q J ,,tar, Pahl I, 4I lutl r Ilr.l 1 ' ' L.. 110 1161 I 1 i 1 '•~;I:wi.'1T.aTT.1T':M'~' '-FIT'~J •a.uNN rnuY. .~.'''1` Il Mt111 11111 f11~01~ it fl 111.111 1111_ I i/ I f V t ' I Y `I 1 `1 ~ II 1 1 i i E t 1 I i I y( I 1 4 N DATE': 06/07/88 r = I CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORhAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMt Lloyd V, Harrell, City 1-,anager SU13JECIi V'-43, Variance of Sidewalk Provisions for La Villa Addition RECCMMENDATIm The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial at its May 11, 1988 meeting by a vote of 5-0, SUMMARY: LaVilla Addition to a proposed replat of 1.997 acres located between West Hickory Street and Stella Street east of their intersection with Avenue F, The property is part of the Owsley Park Addition and Stella Lea Owsley Park Addition and further described as a tract in the Eugene Puchalski Survey, Abstract No. 996. According to Article 4.04 of Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances, Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, sidewalks are required 'on one side of all thoroughfares and collector streets within and adjoining a subdivision Hickory Street is a major arterial and the Regulations require the installation of a sidewalk along Hickory Street, Sidewalks exist in this area and along Hickory Street. A recent development along Hickory Street east of this site installed a k sidewalk. E The variance procedure in the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations states that the following criteria must be met to grant a ~ariancet 1, Granting of the request would not violate any master plans. 3. The sl%cisl or peculiar conditions upon hich the request is based r•',•e to the topography, shape, other unique physical features the property, which are not nerally commo" to ether prop:rtiesr 3, The special or peculiar conditions upon which the request is based did not result from or were not created by the owner's or any prior owne:'s r.ction or omission, The Planning and Zoning Commission concluded that only one of these criteria were met and recommended that the variance of the sidewalk be denied, j 'r 4, i i N ' CC Report Format v-43 Page 2 i BACKGROUNDS The replrt for the La4illa Addition was submitted to combine several smeller lore into one large lot. Several apartment complexes are ` located on the property. f PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTEN IIII ` Development Review Committees property owners and citizens if the 11 sidewalk is not required. iSCAL IMPACTS In the future$ the city would be required to install the sidewalk if the variance is granted, Re f 11' ub cdt Llo d V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: U Cx _ Cecile Carson Urban Planner ~ APP d anc he Robb ne Executive Director for Planning and Development i ,i. i p t ' r { i i e . r,- w t I RECOH4,AVATION TO CI1Y COONC'1L V-43 ` i The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on May 11, 1986 to consider the petition of bN-J Properties requesting a variance of Article 4.04 of Appendix A of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas. After consideration and discussion of the following criteria, the Commission t recommended denial by a vote of 5-0 at its meeting on May 11, 1968. The Com- mission besed its recommend&tion on the foll,,0 ng responses to the crltertai ! 1. Crauting of the request would not violate any maser plans. f` The Denton Development Guide specified that priority be given to develop sidewalks In residential areas. i i 2. the special or peculiar conditions upon which the request is based relate to the topography, shape, or other unique physical features of the p,.op- etty, which are not generally common to other properties. Tho property has no unique features that woulu cause special consideration. No conditions exist to repeat the construction of the sidewalk and other sidewalks have been constructed in the area. F The s ectal or p peculiar conditlcas upon .:y!ch the request is based did not result rom or were not created by the owner's or any prior owner's action or omission. Th-e pro err owners have requested only a replatting of the property and have not seated an~epeciel or p:.iliar conditions. I t Respectfully submitted V C_tic.C,,~ Fuline Brock, Vice-chairperson Planning and Zoning Commission 4 t! , i V.. 43 SIDEWALK VARIANCE uuu.~uu~cuau~~ Q a ' o ❑ SCRIPTUR DF® CRIPTURE w, OAK ~ W. OAK j a~_ ti w WtK RY o -IF LL as 1a►~yearre x„T u 1 i I 1 n , mw w mu N rH Y1F 1Y bvrR 'a. ew e I lYlfulY 1fr SM~ 1t 1'u IIO11H 1,1 1lt 11111111y1 t1I ALL1 ■ LY ~IrI1YYIt, Il1rw 0, '"111" 11.#•I NWI Is Ar ,1 III 1710 nyt nitinirnii liJ WIN IIUJ%[111{WIIfl Jr11un1 IIILIL I11M fY1 IWN N /YOI !M M IIL Ye1nw, 141 r nn J1 INM 11 I{I IYf , 1/4 rW LMN1 144 JY N M 1.{ 1 1 I Ir YIpYw "go. NLLee FMYL YV1Tt • ~Y tY1``H 1YIt10b I4t Y111[1 II IKOI,If J w~1t JiY ~ all /H✓5 , INI ell. tlp INI111 of ow [seen, MALI. se FPYT Yw 14 11114 m a f14L1 NY111w a NLLCNr 1YL Ut.fLL IYtnrN L/ IN ,JWplll MIY %Mlsa lr IIKt 1 w /11.H YQ11pl 1, 11 IYl I11H 1, WI se[w n1 n1Y1N111 N I11111w W /HI Also • Yl w IIWL {wN1 Lw IY YIf IIl1 r+Af r tI1Yt •I'1 r. 11. ICLRt Su so. VIA, rJ rltaoA ~XL1t 6IIY I1 wM1 NII, If 1Lt IIt1 II tt1n,1 \O 1/ Irlel 1111111[ n1 I r 1 / 1 /~:~J 1 WN JIf ~t 111.O~1riOf f111111111/1K14t11011i11It11L61{ _ ...Jiiwww ' Ir~nr L1I M 101x1 IIU111.P1 N 1,+1 Hn1111tttnl MIN 1HN1n 111 u1[1111Lt leasetN I IItl 14411 N1 JL N H ,"1HT141 ICKOAM--~TIIEEf--• t1wl as Sell" IMWl 31 11 r YLr1 L Los atln rL4 Lwlnw .il(np~ H1 11m 1 n.l r P' tit iii.li i ti u mpg 191111 111 { r renll w WYf L111nrr J# _r 1 441 II.III M1n " As tM"ll, I b ex[ 1NIwtt m w 11 1 s v rnwo ter, Fri Ifnu,4' oNsel 1w•tsN N n1 WII 4 0h" `IUKeOno 6l eri IVY •1l 1'1io 111# r Mw. tNW W nY INY 1. N INII no", L T I Ir 14el." WYU IYww 1M1 1•u n WON, r M Iwrt 'jI mr, Inlvlnm Oil moll 0 x0.•. Y,M, ; 1i 1 I n4.I ow ih Wiiia. 1 Al We mr, so I. E'l Ni1~?: S'i I I.LA Lsteatite r Iw I i Il1JIEUj. Iw . mm Z/wH w ION Ye 11a INi`>i S I 1 • m rwwwl NO /nw ar Wwwrw Yr+f ,t10. } 1 E 1tlr7ptnORi-I¢~flf7,lllf Ad. J _ - 4 r r tar .7... ? .1.n Will Irw1 w • Ynof oG M MYt1Yl1 tAlf MLIt 1, M M tIU 1L1 1}I =pI J1M w i as, flormuul~NlWw Jose ,40111 1 JCO o w lI min ass Ir 111# US ~ta1JM N• ht{ lw , IN 1.L le D D I T I ON L1 NN wrtr /rY11 1wlO W N tome r I ~l~~J "a"', y 1 M,a1~,111 SIN wIW /IHI fnN N BY YI WI N 0,1441 told - 4111 Mae NuIr.-TIM Or 111103 7 9 eru Itlm~ewJ1 JV r I 1... as 151WWI ~ NLn11~1 enarrNl4n Sf L 1{YJI 'It rR W1.Y n 1WI nYNTt1 ,y Pat 1.44111. ru M. Irlnlm r11r1u H1YYtIN~ N j tIN 7 _ IU I~t IYIIIt wH 1 1111411 wll ►4/ N l Y I/wLL L1 •--174«t!- ^-tlAltl-~"~T- .M.'111IHw am t°iswY1'4Mw.n11M 11w N OMA min M IoW W r1w/ A Llwlf lost n' wIIYNYwts tlw w ltnw. ~ OMIII Y ~ tAl1t ~ ADO it N ~ , 01t,1 WI NM/rLll Mena ItII`` ~t_9 t~ 4 i --I 144 W, AY/ wMS IWR ►hN IlNlt /lAT ~ ur I, lull oht r0 Kt V"" t'TCaP'M~T1H 9t410M itlll ' I w1 YIC IN • ARM I i 1t r 11 U, l / tAhf aYt fh/lhttq A t11rrS1'011 topLOp l~f 1 M 1 ' 4411 q•n111/ 11 al t-LI1! g1n91t. ItlLt Ilpl 111 n LOOM SPY M nL dw W C0.rH f 4411 N. 111 N L11O ' i 1 K 1988 ~ /VISED L4 1: rr ~...cranlwdcr,wsv..w.r.w .,lns»ro.„ .v • . J I N P41 k'Inute: D ran A F ~May Il, 1986 Page 6 Jesne Morrison, 2C41 Scripture, staled that she and the conmlttee felt that if a tree was removed, it should be replaced with a tree of the setae sire or larger, r F, tree s. Brock said thwt she flet the size of the protected Carson said sffaller to save was other save trees the as well. ~,s trees 1 from being destroyed. Ms. Brock asked the Co:,z,(sslon what they felt of the recomnendatlon sating, "khen a lut is devoted entirely to parking, it would not be consdiered a street yard and required the 2u percent, but Instead the perimeter screening requirements would apply along with the s percent of the Interior, Mr. Glasscock sold that he thought It sounded good, ?,~r. Strange said that he thought ttere should be ono tree for eyery S0 feet. asked 1MstACersormilstatedsthatdi~d~roonversatfon wJth Charlie k'atklns, information was provided and he felt i that it should only be considered a beautification issue. j l1 Mr. r. Holt asked if it would only effect new development. differentsissue,iutThe hproblem Commission existing i duumpsIth terswand r what to do with uture development. ~t Pit. Morrls said that it is tied to a permitting process backttouplanningostaff thenl f in exi time he said that it Is not tied in with any building permit or development procedures, hr, halt asked where it would be dFated in the ordinance, Mr. Robbins stated that it could be paced in the back of i article 306, landscaping and bse of rublic Parkways and fseMonts. - Ms, Brock asked what could be done with the 1S foot wide buffers, Mr. Robbins said that it wu discussed as a fifth option for the screening requirement. Mr. Strange said that he recommended to have the 15 foot buffer replaced with a 3 foot plant screening. Chair declared public hearing closed. Ms. Block asked how they should go through the ordinance. mt. Robbins recommendee that they go through each area of change. t Mr. Karmen roved to see the changes in the ordinance before making a notion. Seconded by hr. Glasscock and unanimously carried (S•0), S. Y•43, Petition of 8M-J Properties requesting a variance Ge v elopment4RegulotlonsConyaol.Sbi acreutractslocated land between kest Hickory Street and Stella Street at Avenue F, This property is further described as a tract In the Eugene Puchelski Survey, Abstract 996. Article 4.04 rec,ufrea that developers install sidewalks on one side df all thoroughfares and collector streets adjofnln a subdivision, A sidewalk Is required along the soutg side of hickory Street, E i .J + . H62 kinutcs tay Il, 1v6B tge I Light notices ere railed to adJac0nt property owners; one reply form was received in laser and none were received in opposition. STAFF REPCRTt Eqs. Carson stated that the L+Yilla Addition J + a Proposes replat of 1.697 acres and is for multi family use. Cod eeof + ordinances',g Suto Article bdivision and 4 Land AyyLevelcprentt the C Regulations, sidewalks are required "on one side of all ` thoron hEareI and Collector streeis within ano ad a I subdlvlslon.,." Hickory Street i the Regulatiors require the lnstallition of a sidewalk 1f along Hickory Street. ks. Carson stated that in this Particular are,, there is a large concentration of multi family lute. Shere has been new construction In the area along Hickory Street and sidewalks were constructed as part of the subdivision requirements. She said the variance procedure in the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations stttes that the Planning ` and Zoning Com^.ission make a recommendation to the City Council. The regulstions contain three criteria on which the recomrendstion should be based: i 1. Granting of the request would not violate any master plans. s 1. She special or peculiar conditions upon which the request is bases related to the topography, st,ape, dr other unique physical features of thr property, which are not generally common to other ptopett es; 3. The special or peculiar conditions upon which the request is based did not result from or were not created by the owner's or any prior owner's action or omission, Ms. Carson stated that revelopment Review Committee concludes that only one of these criteria is met and recommends that the variance of the sidewalk be denied. Mr. Glasscock asked if the petitioner had lanned on building now or wbat the reason was that Jey were asking for the variance. Ms. Carson said that the property is currently divided into ten lots and are taxed individually and the purpose of trpat is to combine the lots into one lot for t+sing purposes. PhT1TIO W nary Hammett, representative for BM•J roper es, sold that the main purpose of the variance was to remove the current lot ilnes. he said that there was not a topographical reason for not doing the sidewalks approvalthat of the w Subdivision existing Regulations! at the tire of Mr. Holt askea how many apartments risted on the land. Hr. Hammett aaid that there is one building on each lot, bM•J owns all of the property. Ms. Kiker asked why they needed the variance on the liliesaare inMfr ntmofttheabuildings,randtby putttnopinty sidewsfas the Fie leasing the apartments would lose their yards. He added that the BM•J Properties did not forenewedevelopment butbnotlforaexlsting buildings ,good i r' PSZ Minutes May 11, 1996 F Page 6 Mr. Glasscock asked if they planned on doing any can- structian. Mr. tumaett saia no. Mr. Holt said if they reylotted ano 'rater wanted to sell, they would have to resubdivtue, hs. Carson said that they i could tear down the existing structures and build new buildings without regard to lot lines. Mr. Hammett said that he understood that the Cltyy planned to repave hickory Street and Avenue F and that EDl•J Prop- ertles has agreed to QQlve up a 10 a 10 foot piece of property to the city fo1 rtgl,t-of•way. IN FAVOR: None Present, OPPOSED: None Present. Ms, hiker asked what esistiny sidewalks are currently near the site. Ms. Carson said that A townhouse development constructed a sidewalk at the southeast corner of Avenue E and Hickory Street. She said that in this area they have paved from the curb to the building, REC014ENDATION: Ms. Cu son statod that the Development Review committee recommends dental. ~i REBUTTALt None Offered ~ Chair declared public hearing closed. ~ f DLCISION; Mr. halt moved to recommend denial of V-0. 3eccnde3 by Ms. Niker and unanimously carried (S•0). C. PRELIMINARY AND Flh1L PLAI OF THE LAYILLA ADDITION, Lot 1, block 1, n-1 a yep at o ots -6, oc of t e Owsley Park Addition, and .ots S•8 of the Stella Lee Owsley Addition. f 11. CONSIDER PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF THE RF.AUSE ADDITION, Lets an , oc A. 111, DIRLCTOR'S REPORT . i Cc i r r' N t I yi i I i E ~ I i r l i y I I Jr 1 I i i f { CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of a tax refund to Elwood Reber RECOMMENDATION: The Tax Technician has determined that a tax refund should be issued. SUMMARY: Chapter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00. Taxpayer, Elwood Reber has requested a refund in the amount of $ 599.58 since duplicate tax payments were made on account #7040-01100. BACKGROUND: Flwood Reber made payment on December 14, 1087 in the amount of $ `9,58. The mortgage company also paid taxes on December 31, 1987 $ it :e amount of $ 599.58. Tax records indicate payments of $ 1,199.16 av,, 'st a tax base of $ 599.58. A tax refund is due. P1?1(AMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: i 1he tax department and the tax account of Elwood Reber FISCAL IMPACT: ~ $ 599.68 ~l RESPE L YJI oy arre 1 City Manager I Prepared by: Vic Schneider ame Title Tax Technician Approved: amee/ onte mercer Title Controller 2633C/3 r ~l y f n s Y I I N StAto Prop" tlaa acrd APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND Refund Appltalion 3131(4182) Collecting Office Name: d br,1 in 71; Collecting Tax For: 0_ „ ' (Taxing nits) is- ~k • ~ f r r 76 .~c Address City, Slate, Zip Code j In order to apply for a tax refund, the following Information must be provided by the taxpayer. IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWN A: Name: oo oL P 6Pr Address: L it 94W -ea o.3y Telephone Number (if additional information is needed): 7- j IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Description of Property: do ,E Address or Location of Property. f GoO-V n rr or j';- 6020! Account Number of Property: -?QJ~O-oi/GU or Tax Receipt Number. INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Unit Year for Amount of From Which Refund Which Refund Oats of the Amount of Tax Refund Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested I 1.19 19 F7 S 5 o s 2. 19.CrL $ T? 97- S - 5`57 .5T~ 3. 19 / 19 $ S ' Taxpayer's reason for refund (attach supporting documentation): s ~ "I hereby apply for the rotund of the above4acribed taxes and certify that the information I have given on this form Is true and correct" Alley ~~(yl Signature Date pplicat on for Tax Refund DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Appfoyat Disapproval Signature of Authorized Off leer Dote Signature of Prodding Officer(s) of Taxiing Date Unit(s) for refund applications over $300 Any person whemakes afalaentry upon the foregoing record shall be subject to one of the followingpenNOes; 1. ImpAaonmentof not more than 10 years nor less then Z years and/of a Arse of net more then 11,000 or teeth such One and tmprleenmen! s, confinement In Ian for a tef fn up to t year or a time not to eaeeed $3,000 or both such time and Imprisonment as set forth In Aectlon 31P.10, Panel Code. wwc P 90 COLLECTIONS 4 w I 1 I J nwOOD ON ALMA MM MNl1 2 T 6 t101O0M0011O ~ !MU!!M DQRdI g 1 PAY ro "d 1 I aa4 Of DOLLAIS ! r f 1I 1923982~: 276 r'0000059958J' i } t~ 1. E s I E I s1 1 i V7 kA PAL Aiv. A., vet l 1L. ii2w'~;.+'" r , 'Y 1 I ` N f n ,i J f '~A'pvKE~ R74L~Ft~E r"7e~; 01.9 " YNNNhriNN 7 r+INC,N M4AAYN'lAN } STfi;W~.119A~fiIl~ ,.1-nry,pO,f~.,AA1PY r~ 7 GRAY 61ILL17,4 C 448,71 VNNN14NNN 1/j~ 4C I• UJUO ~ ~ f5 ~ y N~ Jywte.+. )1J 1J 7 0.A!€NT L 7zP,1 INN 1 + , r SSi6 rNNVVw ' 2iie jj6' iJ E 1, J r Nvn t J ~I`~~ •i i 5 IerlAT~j k~Guilr~ a c 7 C E7 SMItN {VARIS W 3= 111 r u e ' BA0.DSRAO DUAWARO B JR fN14.32 TNNNNNNN 1 RS EL)4: 1j. a~w'~'w 1~ fj jay tY 1N1~1 97 WAISFCYJ D C 640.01 YNNNNNNN 10/30 640:01 YI ' 'l. I,I J,w , S•Jl - .rA 00 3 tu.}J1Ai 11 7.} 151 l `170.4001100I198? TNIIUs 70"01300 1957, .I } DATE 21291" TAM MIAL BALANCE ACAL PAU 2A0 PENALTY EFTf(t IVE r1E4 l 0t ;rCl171 N 74~600 ACCCINhIF Y NAi NET TAX CODE A PD-DATE TAX PAID PEN PAID ,.1AA DUE FEN DUE TOTAL N DUE D4 E 11 i/ BttaA'EtW7oD f, AC{:urt a $99 59 IT l7NNN' 1 )1E ?7 6 ` a 6 705E}►J OQyIDA A._.. 77 9Ar~GgAAA 1 7 8 ALMS, ED' A 04 0 l 2 , A 7r KIT CH N ~ - 97,49 YThNrfNNNN 121 11 1a 694.0 T 729.5 rNNNNNW 12)ta T26:S 1 { 67 CLAAY.€ JvrAJD ESA 71)c.6~ INNNNTINN 2/29 704,6 ' - 49 7 ` F ,_4?_.;iN Mkt{'4E_Bkc 1161 ;~!.564p_._._._...f5414f__ThvNNNNN 7 C• Y W rc w lr ._..rtt y~ tOppOO033OpO0' D? ROBINS N, (VAR E 05.26 YN1YNANN p) 71.1 ' 9 ?O7uJ1JllU 95 4OBINSC++, ED;AR F 651.22 12/17 8!1:22- 26 61.47 986.73 TA . 1`p r EE 5 1 r ACCCl7vT T~-L 986:75 ..tNN,N 70. 1. ' TT CU UAI 707 ..A7.`fwF`X,LFtkIE C^kP . 99 fff t,......._._ 195 E..._..._ r ! VIA I .'.1~f,7Q~i7 ND#n JAnES N 733: PHn4~A ?p 755- li~ ,1+ ) e? L6t Et'1 aceER1 r ?55.y, rNnNwJNV 1 rte T $T 7t- .01 t eT FxD 'e E<T.O6 INNNNNNN /01 be p6- yfjN ' 7 HlrKf MAIlf i JR 7 4. NN ~ /ib 754.37 0.1 .00 U) 7`t:VtR 1 +I 7 ? FI1 Ek1 IIA411 N 6 6.~4 77 INN-NN F2/ s1 626.04- I)o pry g l ! W 1 ~1~117.1 r ~ 67' r~J4~ 'A'rES rNH~vNNN (jqq Ks 41 7 1 51' ~I7 CfSSA, DANA) AA"1~ff8"'"':Z' I , I 1 1 ~AlAF: ;005110 7 KIRA111, FAEO N 6~ 684,94- i._.....-. l 691.94 INNNYM 12/ 1 " 1pR1~ 5 LID 7 )h377 PEACE J. E; D 626.32 YNnnNNNN }2/ 9 N N 957 06 INNNNYNJ 121st l.J ~Jp2. ~1 ~U :L7 ,IXt .i.ll>s..t ?I~hr l kl P ~1~7l rA)J 87 t~N r v + h3.39 tNNNNNNN 10/29 787.34- . ! 71 y J 6ADI, EA'.J N L C I , .€I.. . ? 14NNVNW 't21 7 hl. Ol .Ill) • ll :0 J b7..~E! , % ) S.v, 4&N D'7 7551Tb' 4 riHVNrk 127Tb._...75~:16 ' 5E 7` + JJ N) A4Y, JACK fr r (II ill f-..... ai~•. 1jl~~YD't J JJ 2170 87 FEICMEL et 11 A 765.i) 7NNNN%NN }21{1,6 765.. ,1)V I~p x(,71) n)bAJt ~IJ 3l/ ;!TO ('03F4 D 34. 1 1VMNNANI r/ 7 1}. 1 NN" 175 11 Ne• nCAF Aktk€, cTAFf.I E A CIE E fi i, in 9J fb.'~.~>L,}•r)L :Sys... .A1Yr s~:......•~ ..OU►a1.C-.lv+iQS'11 7ir A!'A.' 1 1 1 1 W t'.32 tNN4NNNN 1/ W 00 t q 1i" 5 Gf+ E? GA• ~-OJ + 1 INN•r.vJ gy l QLl J 7 PNNNY , 1 L ' N.I&fJtri a/ NA, rr ' nI 1; J5~. 5 wiG 111 16 )1/I) 6/ U fy.t+'pl•IE' <<S.09 r4weeiNN /414 ' ql,0q 1}. .r t. ii 11 » rX ,J) AJ RV,,!,, CMAR'_iS L 65.59 thnvYNNN 12/2S M9.55- l1Yj .JO .111 Hi'HJJ21 )J 9I O10.iR, I~AJ.4' E JR i:µ'•76 1NN•M'INN 12/14 9':6.16- .l ' 'IA) I .•+1 t 1..11 ' 7::'11 a:rf y7 ''A'I" I,r t1. vS I.OJY'NINY 11121 1,2v).91. q •P T. lwI HC .F L ,II • riJY/Nl1-'ll7 "~11 T' i,.nrivNYHV - ~/r VrJ11I 'l t .tl , t4 ~1 1 r~ 1 il, { VHrrMNN A k4.%,. 7x6 )1 R,7 ,trt.Ea, Jf,NN H. 1,13 ...7 i.Gt=.... 5" 71)1) >V .i Iy;1IJ 57 Lfw. i, J "MI 7 1;'l/. 2C 1NNNN.4 IN 121}6 E!1 J.: 6- .1A1 II •'X : ~55`q 5• } 1''hl t'Al) 9T ifA "t!rE+ J. 71.44 IHVWInNN 1/V6 7C 7, 11- r :111 .1, 11 t 7~1Nf'e111. 57 .Af,4" CnGI (i, b17. 16 Wee, NN 1/ 14 7 7. Ihl .4~ /T 4G ' 7i'I1~yI1' 41 R/ r'. 1 A' I r R.,i l1' hl ,p}. A f 1 wyy7 ' 1'WY4'+NNryry 12/t' 1' 1^ 4r- i5 X ~ALlhr I l!1 7A•IIl J4 9 I IN4N'IHYV 1 /t lA, 1 '..111"` ! 7;.11SLIj R/ rn., 'r.rn' 2 6 K'J, „ /rr/J I"l)!I dJ 11 ✓A•€M Fa~Ly q, '.Rr'• '1''Ia+'INN 12/x) 74 j' fir. '~1; .~11 ,-11 11 .i%5 i I'r111 '4 , vtVI''uit r 1 tt ~~.tl rW+Y•1 YN1 11,31 7Y i.ll- ,11 '.Ii , 11 ,.II '..1rt 1 Jr,r 4f1 1 tI }111 .71 1N."'.0, N I/7V 1 >I~'rl 1 11 _ •'ll . 7)ii f...j .4 r1 A''7 . _ ,I,'I 41 14'1'PNWI 1 /N I' III.. 'ill ~'I~.~I+ill 1/ I it-C, WE. tA.•`rnr,ltur ~i..~1' 1r/„IN 9'"T7/I~ +p;:ZS_ •~1,y~..... . .~I ,I' 4il rX1S'1 nrJ gv I r+ nw1 I. 71..1 tvl iNv4N 1,/1!~ !I'4.~'- 11 S .1l N.~.. "/rll. FI I'Lr 'E lA A Y'St.gS H:144'+HN 12/1+1 r. •!1 ,111 II 1 1 ,Hh~NrHN 12111 r,~l.ls '(rl 11 ,ul . U Yrr 1 n'+ 11 I),•1t. r1, n,t.13 . 1r I / wy.,r r. . .JI . 11 ,.11 .IH• 1..r1r.u. 'V 1 3 PI, V } /19 ll •,hl .t' n 1, 1 J hifYAhY .1~r1h / .'U ,ill ,.,1 ri Itl' r r s ~'3A ~ , Y . r1 t!Jlt , 0.4 :a I J I It I y 3 I l g I N i rr" ~r SS -FFIFF T-Url TTT= i 4 It" ,I i i DAM;: 06/U7/68 CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORFAT " TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE ARBY'S ADDITION, LOT 1, BLOCK A REWIt NDATIUN: The Planning and Zoning Cowmission, at Its meeting of May 25, 1988, } recommended approval. ~ SUh1FARY: This is a 0.540 acre tract located between University Drive and Suoaet Street west of Alice Street and shown in the R. Beaumont c Survey, Abstract No. 31. { s . BACKGROUNDS The property is coned general retail and restaurant development is anticipated. City services and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available. The plat conforms to the minimum requiremeuts of the Denton Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. PROGRANSp DLPARTF,ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECIEU: N/A FISCAL IMPAC_Ii N/A Res fu ly~tyby(i~Cte : _z f Lloy Y. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: s'e~ ns Elie eth Evans { Planning Administrator APP v : i Frank H. Robbins Executive Director for Planning and Development eii ARBY'S ADDITION y Yr• _ . frroi µj• *~1 ~~~YYYY ~rM~rr~.lY~~`~. 1111 Y~Y~.• wood A 99 1~ r 1 L/ r IM__ ~r ~ r o ~rr~ Mr i~o •f.r~_rrrr.r•r di LA 1 'm r FSinai smi DOW lowum I'll I j A~ © ~Wrur r_ru r+r r. r+.. s wr. two ' OLE po ~oa bom. In nr~nnn~~.., A, /M 11 J / Mw M06. 0... . i iQM• r . ^ rfllr . 16. Am" I IA• f1Uf rr,, f11/ womm Grow IM SNAS VLSI LLJ. now 01 POP ft== 71M11N twv 9, 6% i now 0*%".Afnm" @now ._1 17rrr If/ Iii 1 um rfwf. >tw ~/Iw >t►M~rir rr7r sic% •t Arf+t AM mo I ~~1 r~~7M11fWl Y61tiM lb ~ w~ _ 7M179 S r M pop 9 GO ~w9iwiw~a'I ~w~ . •r p /ffr f F. IN Mft• im"off"m tat 4~ i+ Noi e►w.. } 1 r I 4 t { I fit Bill f R i -ET 11 f I I ~kk t i I .i i h DATE: U6/U7/b8 Q fY COUNCIL kL80kT FORFAT TOs Mayor and Members of the City Council i FkOhs Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REPLAT OF LOTS 10 and 11 INTO LOT Ilk OF ThE F'OkRESTkILGE ADDITION, SECTIUN 111 RECOMHENDATIONs The Planning and Zoning Commission, at its meeting of May 25, 15683 recommended approval. } F i SWAR1 s i S This is a 0.156 acre tract located north of Oak Forrest Circle s and west of Fortestridge Drive and shown in the A. Gibson Survey, Abstract No. 498, b1CKGROUND: y A The property is zoned St-16 and single family development is anticipated. s City services and facilities, including water, gas, sanitary sewer, telephone, electrical, and solid waste, are available. The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the Denton Subdivial.on and Land Development Regulations. PROGWS, UEPARTlEN1'b OR GROUPS AFIECIEDS ' N/A FISCAL IMPACTS N/A Respect y sub tt .I Lloyd Harrell J Prepared by: City Manager E c t Evans Planning Administrator ! Appro e a o na Executive Director for Planning and Development a 4 1. f I REPLAT IN tt FORReSTRIDGE 111 E NORTH i E j h w 1. l i i k am, 4 X11 ~ i RYAN I . _ R LOT 11 R s I i i .J p •05 ~ 9b ~ Xa~.c __j_.I'~~'.. ~~'~9~* t t~y~tKl"•'~ k 5T' r I LH)l' • . F ' M ro m ' IWrrr u•u ' 1 NtiNif Y• M Nrrt 1 I r, a r 1 let Ilk r1N1 ,If~. i. 111 IaiMelrl.RWLLNr lftllm i4 i 1 i to Is It B LIO C K 1 F I• 1t Iwlan,t rocs rargl ~o y:71 1` II • I. 10 Ylwl. fr w wlnua u.~• •eella w nl.de~ti ~ln a 1a1i i t0111~ l rL•ir .tnctu. a111r j 04K OORR t. >nN+N•stwtl~tww«Nrwnwt,. t t C'___' EST CIRCLE a. 1 m.•lt.bMleat.r.IWn.tm-rr.,rmr rt.w Y S•Ipttr«w !I 1.tltL1LT,., 1• tam«t vrtNw a~ LLb ~lr u. rnq<1n4e 1n rnwnls. r~N ',r+lsl~u ' _ L 1h1• .r .11 n.nvra^I pity, w tn.e r.il. N'• ~ 7« tOtr la"ti«!t nl.tla V Litt 0 rota •tratt•r YtNr, FE- ~I lORRf37111DGf ADDITION 7, VI WIJ<Icn.•rM~rouvrh Mala tll atM r[•ea, •r I SfC 1Q ` ' • I. Mal4. la b «anlrlP"t M lrm 'I Its 1~ t 1 e Cca! E f Slid. Si3 1 In•I%N 7n t LIv t a• d ' it L uu r 1 I ti ty letw Will ttn.b w rfNr b lers~N••;ai1w , •.I ~ Raub tt •n q INS ktal t\ qwr b Lqq, a b Fnw ! •,r BLOCK SI Il{ . .f ,.r r f Jute r W ",,,u LYfr AVI.1 N ILr tip. lAcm N rolhrmml romoltcna tv ~ oitt 1 I1pf~ LOT gM~11ap `1a6tw~Itetlmy tI.U t! o $ L 13 R I.l 41 l ti, N.'tFbw • ~ 0 ! d to I le ~ °.,.`I ciiRp~~ a,w1M . ~ , I ely t• r1`~ _ r rt14~ ^-`-C'~1"~'i 1 II A.I'r~1tla" 't, •J r ` A41 is W& IM • t • S lot; 60 I! 11 B L 0 C'K F I I0 i C~t~ R~ r 1 I rr t I r s REVISED I A Y- JI ~ 1 r tI 11 1 'I I r I .r• 1 c I't L. N ,f n. .'r Il» ! .^I. rr. .rxn 1 t +I Inl ur..rl N 1 1 I Lr In, t t r, r.r x, I MIN NI N tHl l2 ID 1 1 I I 1 1.+, In lM 111 M NJ In M N ^Ml N \ F I t 4 ; I xll Ie- 1.1 II Irllnrl r 11111 Itf 1 1111 rSjl YYY,,, ~~1 I II r'. f"1 r 1 Yln. r r 11 tlr.lxll In,r 1111 N •E ~~r~~L~ ! ~r 1 'I IN ! 1 Y L ml II IM IrNI YIN MI tlYl Yr r In Iw n1 E I I` l..N 11 111 Ir It Y.11 [IrArr rf L.1 ID 11 11.:1 h L ` •Id 11[41 kn n N 41rw II xN. n W INMb 411.111 NI NII Ilx N ly bll Nt / . b im 11 N1 IN rnl Ilw f W IxuN f.11 11 w 1 N 10 1 lu, u 4r M L_~ J' _ _ 4 W 11 IM xrlMtl Grw N GI 1 N If W III' Nl I/. IN ur Y41 ql 4nN111 Gnn I~t I!NI q r q•H1 Ic ••1 I Inln H N lol 11 1fu N OR InW1 WI x11114 F1111N N M 1111 _ ( 1; n 1 ! IIN•Mn 11 I ID 11M IILII !N p... q 1Y 4tMU1 Guwr IN YY YIY IN hnMN 10 I' 1 4 u 1 N1 11r 1 uRbxMr, N;N q• I a I It ql %I 1111 II j <In 11 b NIA 1 b tl Ib, - It Ai NII Y N IrN N LIN 11 IY Nrg1u rY _ N q1 INI Yl II, IN MN MIN III 41,1xn1 MINI N NI lil 1nbrlrllN Llll MI I 1 - - ` _ hPa Nxlk N YIIMI II N C INM4 NN 1111 W 411 IIN 11 tM YII bl y { II II I.I IN kx1 11w N I4 III n N1 IN, , / .IMN 11 1N !Nl Y Y I.l IN IMN I 1 E OAK IM IIIMx11 Gnrl YT II III W 1111x II YI MI/ 41111n11111 111 POOREST MHG hro N NHx, h xl•an N 1 ^N1 ux .I q 1 Nlq GM N IN tl/ 4L x a YI w N.k uM If IM Lu NNmn curd. 111w N1 't N .111 E CIRCIE 10' ROY M r11114r.rn r1 N It l u I 4 Nx4l 11 YW4~ / N 4 u IIN Nl /lMun IyIOLlIIl1y 11 In .11 It _ 14tl N141IIIr IN UY 1.IY 11 qMn 111 _ / _ _ b IN !r~_'. W 11 1 LYf ,1N ILL Iq 11 MITI Hr11kH~ 1f11 1 ' 'A II'L• L V IT [L !N 1, 4YI44q IIH Iu IY IRxll / u\r. IYtlr.1 IM 4rIl1 4NNN1 IORRL 01, 1IN 411 I /14100 1 I l0} 111 IYx/ 1 Ip1uM1IN1 .RAIN, Mf11N Lfl II IM IIN If IMIII~ I!L II t IC iI C11 N 1 f rF n.N W 4rn! IdlM 1. n IM M Y IN dn.N w ILUa 011' L ChlhCt~ 1 1111p~d ul 1 FII I um.1.1 MHI 4nM. It £ I trrrr-K nrr r-- 1 N.,I H 11N1 3 'I X f I' r r [r:xlT N NqN 1 1 11 ON II, .4 M1 r11M1 41ry h11Y I. rl IN hll OIIry MI 1111, N MII NI I H r11n111I N[MrN l 1, h11L1 11 1AN~ INw 1/ M N 4 IY rynN 1M11 NV rI '"Y rbnlHl 1• IM IIIIH III F1 1xN 1 M hllr. bl N N N qN M nnkbl W r f +r1 Y1 XL~ nllrllx IM Fr11x In IM111u61N 14r=d N,nn=-M N W uwl, law. EI I yS \ E } i \1 Q('y /11b L+pN 11 Np IY 11IL N NIIR MN IN M r4n1 HII • LIr ~ 114 4'r, •.r x I l.T.TN fi1~T. ~p Ehl j IC IIL ; IJ II tt S11\ eswF'-Lti1~' ♦ i ^ Sef d Ill'nou uHU1Gr1 • - - / .Y Jnl , ,Ink ILL ryP H %III 11/11011 • i :~-l]I. 1( Y / NIT 1. YI,l1M 11 NMl1, 1 M ROI OI ul l1' 1yr•- IN1 IN rym N lu NIU11N uIn YIM.NI at bti M NII R1101 wi1n1.MP • F IOY 01 ~a~ IMN 11 I 1 I IIN1 IN II M I N I IN IN h1 F•II III IN f1 -nllglf 1 MCI ` I40riM1v11N IM .1111E N1 N,,11111. OAK FORRE sr CIRCLE rh .oY k ii Imrcr, rt:~rrrrer tr--- nleronll 1 E n It REPLAY 11 1 11 LOT IIR BLOCK H, FORRESTRIDOE ( ( 01, AONTION AECTION III , AN ADDITION In IAX pl 'I CITY of DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS E i • eullh /n/eunl 'II IYR/1 Rlht ,b1~1~ 1111/ MIt'. TSi: re ta tll 11' ner 416.4 1rr r11 IMF i E f n Ij a^ f I 1 r i i S 1 { { T ` ti h i N i 0923L I NO. AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN FFFECTIVE: DATE. t WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the purchase of necessary materials, equip- men,, supplies or services in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has reviewed and recommended that the herein described bids are the t lowest responsible bids for the materials, equipment, supplies or services as shown in the "Bid Proposals" submitted therefor; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided in the City Budget for the appropriation of funds to be used for the purchase of the materials, equipment, supplies or services approved and accepted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL'OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the numbered items in the following numbered bids or materials, equipment, supplies, or services, shown in the "Bid Proposals" attached hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids for such items: BID ITEM NUMBER NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 9865 #1 BILL UTTER FORD _ 5,1,177.00 9965 02 UEC EQUIPMENT CO. 67,215.00 .i r I If 4 i SECTION II. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbered items of the submitted bids, the City accepts the offer of the persons submitting the bids for such items and agrees to purchase the materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the terms, specifications, standards quantities and for the specified sums contained in the Bid Invitations, Bid Proposals, and related documents. SECTION III. That should the City and persons submitting approve an accepted items and of the submitted bids wish to enter into a formal written agreement as a result of the acceptance, approval, and awarding of the bids, the City Manager or his designated representative is hereby authorized to execute the written contract which shall be attached hereto; provided ` that the written contract is in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained in the Bid Proposal and related bid documents herein approved and accepted. E SECTION IV. That by the acceptance and approval of the above numbere tams of the submitted bids the City Council hereby i authorizes the expenditure of funds therefor in the amount and in accordance with the approved bids or pursuant to a written contract made pursuant thereto as authorized herein. SECTION Y. That this ordinance shall become effective t imme ate y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this 7 day of 3UNE , 1988. i i RAY h E EN , MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTEST: i JENNIFER WXLTERSO CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: PAGE TWO f 7j r I DATE: June 7, 1988 ' CITY COUNCIL REPORT a 3 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council i FROM: Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager i SUBJECT: BID# 9863 TWO MAN AERIAL DEVICE RECOIVENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the lowest bidder meeting specifications as Indicated. 1. Truck Ca/Chassis Bill Utter Ford in the amount of $310177.00 2. Bucket Body U.E.C. Equipment Co. In the amount of 67 213.00 TOTAL $1 8,392.00 r SUM40.RY: This bid is for the purchase of a two man aerial device with a 73' 1 working height basket. This unit is to be mounted on a 32,000 GVW Ford 8000 truck. f The completed vehicle will be assigned to the Electric Distribution overhead division. It Es: will be used for maintenance and new construction of overhead electric distribution and 1 transmission power lines. The unit offered by Altec does not meet the height requirement necessary to safely work on power lines owned by the City of Denton. The new unit is ! a motor pool fleet addition. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Shcet 1 PROGRAMS. DEPARTIERTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Electric Utility Distribution j FISCAL IMPACT: This unit will be funded from 1987188 budget funds. Account Number 610-080-0232-9230 - Capital Expenditure Transportation Equipment. 1 Respectfully submitted: Lloyd Harrell City Manager pared by: Name: Tom D. Shaw, C.P.M. Titles Assistant Purchasing Agent Approved: jjme: o . Marshall, C.P.M. Title; Purchasing Agent r I I 1 1 1 I I DID 1 04885 I 1 1 J 1 I ! I I I ! BILL I SUMMIT I LONE I BUCkNER I NAHANEY I 1ELAS I LEE I ALTEC I 11) TITLE TWO MAN AERIAL DEVICE I UTTER I WHITE I STAR I MACK IINIERNATIONAL I kCNNURTH I EQUIPMENT I INDUSTRIES 1 ! .............____________._______I FORD ! BMC I FETEABILT I I ! I 1 I ` OPENED MAY 28, 1968 2111PM ! ! 1 I 1 I I I 1 ACCOUNT j ........................................I I I I I 1 I t I I I 1 I ......'.........I................................ I...... I.............. I I I I I I QTY I ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 I VENDOR t VENDOR I VENDOR I VENDOR t VENDOR I VENDER I VENDOR I VENDOR I .........1 I.............. 1 i I ! 1 L..__._._.....i..._.__....__ i i __.._._._..-•1-------------- 1.............. 1 1. t t I TRUCK CABliHA551S I 49,911.11 1 529111.11 1 5514R5.11 1 59,592.11 1 N8 I Na I 55,915.M I NB I 1 I ! 1 t 1 ! t I I I I RAKE I FORD I WHITE I PEtERIILT I MACK I I I PETERBIIT I = I I MODEL I BOON I EtPED1TER 1 121 1 E6211 I I t 121 I I 1 I I I I I I I l I I t ! DELIVERY IN DAYS 1 91.121 1 121 1 91.121 1 IBf 1 ! I 91-121 1 I I t I I 1 I I ! 1 t I I I EITENDED ENiftulAANS NARRANIV 1 151.18, 1 151,11 1 151.11 1 NIA I I I I 1 t I I ! I I I 1 f ~ 2. 1 1 1 13'AERIAL DEVICE 1 k8, I NB 1 81,215.11 1 NB I N8 I N8 I 81,215.N I I 1 1 ALTERNATE III 1 I ! I I ! I I S2,bTf.11 I 1 I . ! I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I MAKE I 1 I I 1 I I MODEL I H1 RANGER I ALTEC I i I I I I 1 I I 1 6H91 (DELIVERY A 1 AR411 I F1EA RECIEPT OF TRUCK I I I I I I I 41 I 151-181 I 1 1 I ! 1 I I r I i I I I ! 1 I All 01 NONE I I ! I I i I I I ! 1 I I 1 t I I I t I I .~3 I I I I = ~ ~ ~ 1 I I I 1 ~ ~ ,I 1 1 I 1 1 ! I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 ! ff I' f Ps i { i to p., i I 1 F 1 A Ljr:~ j(IF( Y ' 1 i i LA-LA-1 11 Uz= UJJE= i JEFM rj= I 1 n i N i 2341E i NO. i i AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 17 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ("PLUMBING CODE") BY AMENDING SECTION 17-2 (a)(16) OF CHAPTER 17- REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HI,REWITH; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $2,000.00; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Section 17-2 (s)(16) of Article I of Chapter 17 of the Cc a of Ordinances of the Ctty of. Denton, Texas is hereby amended to read as follows: E (16) Amend Section 1004 (a) to read: Water pipe and fittings shall be of brass, copper, cast iron, galvanized malleable iron, galvanized wrought iron or galvanized steel. Schedule 40 PVC and AWWA C 900 ing having the National Sanitatiou Foundation seal M_lowed by the letters PW may be used for cold water distribution eystems outside of buildings. All materials used in the water supply system, except valves and similar devices, shall be of a like material, except where otherwise approved by the administrative authority. Any pi e, fitting, solder or flux which is used in the installation or repair of any plumbing in a residential or nonresidential facility providing water for human c:.isumpption which is connected to a public water system ,,hall be lead free. The term "lead free" when used with respect to solders and flux refers to solders and flux containing not more than 0.2 percent lead. When used with respect to pipes and pipe fittings, lead free refers to pipes and pipe fittings containing not more than 8.0 percent of lead. This paragraph shall not apply to leaded joints necessary for the repair of cast iron pipes. SECTION It. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in force when Re provisions of this ordinance become effective which are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or provisions contained in this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict. SECTION 111. Any person who shall violate a provision of this ordnance, jr fails to comply therewith or with any of the requirements thereof, or of a permit or certificate issued thereunder, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each such person shall be deamed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of this ' ordinance is committed, or continued, and upon conviction of any i such violations such person shall be punished within the limits i above. j SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen (14) d eys from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this j ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, I the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. ' j PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988. j i i " j ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: a i ti t MIhUTES PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL CODE BOARD MAY 10, 1988 PRESEN91 Pete Work, Bill Burley, Richard Cooper, Joe Mulroy, Bob Sullivan, George Becker and Jackie Doyle, Building Official AbSENT1 Jeff Johnson 1. Sullivan moved and Burley seconded a motion to approve the minutes of January 21, 1988 as written. Motion carried unanimously. II. The Board briefly discussed a new federal law which will reduce the use of lead in solder, flux, pipe and fittings used to provide water for human consumption when such materials are connected to a public water system. Sullivan moved and Becker seconded a motion to recommend amendment of Section 1004(x) of the plumbi6d code to read as followsl Sec. 1004 (a) water pipe and fittings shall be of braes, copper, cast ' iron, galvanized malleable iron, galvanized wrought iron or galvanized steel. Schedule 40 PVC and L'dWA C 9OU piping having the National Sanitation Foundation seal followed by the letters PW may be used for cold water distribution ,yetems outside of buildings. All materials used in the water supply system, except valves and similar devices, shall be of a like material, except where otherwise approved by the administrative authority. i Any pipe, fitting, solder or flux which Is used in the installation or repair of any plumbing in a residential or nonresidential facility providing water for human consumption which is connected to a public water system shall be lead free. The term "lead free" when used with 1 respect to solders and flux refers to solders and flux containing not 1 more than 0.2 percent lead and when used with respect to pipes and pipe fittings refers to pipes and pipe fittings containing not more than 8.0 percent of lead. This paragraph shall not apply to leaded Points necessary for the repair of cast iron pipes. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9120 a.m. 30348 l j i t f I, i i i fa ~ I 3 ~ I 1 1 -ti i d 2220L ' NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE III (PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS AND ITINERANT VENDORS) OF CHAPTER 20 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF HOME SOLICITATIONS AND ITINERANT MERCHANTS; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS OF THE TERMS USED IN THE REGULATIONS; PROVIDING THAT IERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERSONS ENGAGED IN HOME SOLICITATIONS AND FOR t ITINERANT MERCHANTS WHO WISH TO OFFER GOODS OR SERVICES FOR SALE; PROVIDING FOR APPEAL PROCEDURES; PROVIDING EXEMPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR A MAXIMUM PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $500.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREFOR; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, f WHEREAS, the City Council, upon full consideration of the matter, has determined that for the health, welfare and safety of its citizens, it is desirable to change the regulations governing solicitors and itinerant merchants; NOW, THEREFORE, ' THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: { SECTION I. That Article III of Chapter 20 of the Code of Ordinances-Ta'hereby amended so that said article shall be and t read as follows: ARTICLE III. SOLICITORS AND ITINERANT MERCHANTS Sec. 20-51. Purpose of Article. This entire article is and shall be deemed an exercise of the police power of the state and of the city for the public safety, comfort, convenience and protection of the city and its citizens, and all of the provisions hereof shall be construed for the accomplishment of that purpose. Sec. ?0-52. Definitions. When used in this article, the following words shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section: (a) Goods or merchandise means any personal proper-y of any nature whatsoever except printed mLterial. (b) Home solicitor means a person who goes from house to house or from place to place soliciting, selling or taking orders for, or offering to sell or take orders for any goods, merchandise or services. j (c) Home solicitation transaction means a transaction or the purchase of goods or services, payable in installments or cash, in which the home solicitor engages in a personal solicitation of a sale to a person at a residence. A home j solicitation transaction shall not include a sale made pursuant i to a pre-existing retail charge agreement, or a sale made pursuant to prior negotiations between the parties at a business e9tablishment at a fixed location where goods or services are r offered or exhibited for sale; or a sale of realty in which transaction the purchaser is represented by a licensed attorney or in which the transaction is being negotiated by a licensed real estate broker. (d) Itinerant merchant means a person who sets up and operates a temporary business within the premises of another business or any other building or location in the city, soliciting, selling, or taking orders for, or offering to sell or take orders for any goods or services. (e) Police Chief means the Chief of Police of the City of 44 Denton or his designee. (f) Residence means any sti:nrate living unit occupied for residential purposes by one or more ;ersons, contained within any type of building or structure. (g) Soliciting means selling or attempting to sell goods or services, or to take or attempt to take orders for services or goods to be performed or furnished in the future. Sec. 20-53. Permit Required. It shall be unlawful for any itinerant merchant or home solicitor to sell, display or offer. for sale any goods or services within the city without first obtaining a permit from the city. Sec. 20-54. Affirmative Defenses to Permit Requirement. It shall be an affirm defense to prosecution under Section 20-53 of this Article: (a) That the solicitation is for a charitable, educational or religious purpose, and the defendant exhibits, at the time of solicitation, documentation in writing which identifies him as a representative of the charitable, educational or religious organization for w:.om he is soliciting. PAG F. 2 i r V i s 1 (b) That the solicitor is on the property by invitation of the person residing on such premises. Sec. 20-55. Application. (a) Any person who wishes to engage in home solicitation or L atiy itinerant merchant who wishes to solicit within the citp s shall file a written application with the Police Chief which 1 application shall Phow: I (1) Proof of the identity and home address of the I applicant and the name and address of the employer or firm which such applicant represents; i (2) A brief description of the nature, character and quality of the goods to be sold; (3) If employed by another, the name and business address of the person, firm, association, organization or corporation; (4) If a motor vehicle is to be used, a description of the vehicle together with the motor vehicle registration number and the license number; (5) A description of the proposed location(s) of the solicitation; (6) The period of time the applicant so wishes to solicit, sell or take orders in the city; (7) The names of other communities in which the applicant has worked as a solicitor in the past twelve (12) months; and if he was employed by a different company in those communities, the name of those companies shall also be stated; S) Whether the applicant or any agent of applicant has been convicted within the last five (5) years for burglary, theft, fraud, robbery or rape; (9) Proof of sales tax permit issued by the State or proof that the goods sold are not subject to such sales tax; and (10) An itinerant merchant who makes application to offer his goods for sale upon private property shall pro- vide written proof that he has permission to use such property from the owner, or the owner's agent. PAGE 3 I ' f A.' i 4 i (b) The applicant shall also present written pproof of his authority to represent the company or individual he states he represents. (c) The application shall be accompanied by a fee in the amount of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and no permit hereunder shall be issued until such fee has been paid by such applicant. (d) A permit requested under this article shall be issued for the length of time requested, not to exceed twelve (12) months. f Upon expiration of a permit, the solicitor or itinerant merchant may apply for a new permit in the manner prescribed by ~s this section. ~ j Sec. 20-56. Issuance of Permits It shall be the duty of the Chief of Police to issue such applicant a permit to solicit or sell or take orders for such goods, services or merchandise set forth in the applicant's application within five (5) working days of the receipt of a completed application and prescribed fee unless it has been determined that the application contains false information or the person has been convicted within the last five (5) years of theft, fraud, burglary, robbery or rape. If the application contains false information or the person has been convicted, the Chief shall not issue the permit. Sec. 20-57. Permit Card (a) Upon issuance of a permit, the permittee shall be issued a card which shall contain the name of the permittee, the permit number, and date of expiration. (b) It shall be unlawful for any home solicitor or itinerant merchant to solicit in the City of Denton without carrying the required permit card on his person. (c) It shall be unlawful for an itinerant merchant to solicit at locations other than those listed in his application for a permit. i (d) It shall be unlawful for any person soliciting to fail or refuse to display such permit card upon the request of any person demanding the same. PAGE 4 f` I i N r (e) It shall be unlawful for any person to duplicate or xerox or otherwise display a facsimile of a permit card issued pursuant to this Chapter. Sec. 20-58. Appeal from Denial Any person aggrieved by the action of the Police Chief in the denial of an application for a permit shall have the right of appeal to the City Council. Such appeal shall be taken by filling with the City Manager, within ten (10) days after notice of the action complained of has been mailed to the person's last known address, a written statement setting forth the grounds for the appeal. A hearing on the denial shall be scheduled for the next regular meeting of the Council, to be held within twenty (20) days of the appeal and notice shall be given to the appellant. The decision and order of the City Council on such appeal shall be final and con:lusive. Sec. 20-59. Hours for Home Solicitation (a) A person shall not go upon any residential premises and ring the doorbell, or rap or knock upon the door or create any sound in a manner calculated to attract the attention of the occupant of the residence for the purpose of engaging in or attempting to engage in a home solicitation transaction: (1) Before 9:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. of any day, Monday through Saturday; or (2) At any timr. on a Sunday, New Year's Day, July 4th, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, or Christmas Day. (b) Subsection (e) shall not apply to a visit to the premises as a result of a request or an appointment made y the occupant. Sec. 20-60. Prohibited Conduct. It shall be unlawful for a person engaged in soliciting under this article to: (a) misrepresent the purpose of the solicitation; (b) continue efforts to solicit from an individual once that individual informs the solicitor that he does not wish to make e purchase from that solicitor; PAGE 5 s _ T 5 I (c) represent the issuance of any permit under this article as an endorsement or recommendation of the solicitation. Sec. 20-61. Exhibiting Card Prohibiting Solicitors. f (a) A person, desiring that no merchant or other person engage in a home solicitation at his residence, shall exhibit in a conspicuous place upon or near the main entrance to the ` residence, a weatherproof card, not less tnan two inches by four f inches in size, containing the words, "NO SOLICITORS". The letters shall be not less than two-thirds of an inch in height. I (b) Every solicitor upon going onto any premises upon which a residence is located shall first examine the residence to deter- mine if any notice prohibiting soliciting is exhibited upon or near the main entrance to the residence. If notice prohibiting soliciting is exhibited, the solicitor shall immediately depart from the premises without disturbing the occupant, unless the visit is the result of a request made by the occupant. (c) No person shall go upon any residential premises and ring the doorbell, or rap or knock upon the door or create any sound in a manner calculated to attract the attention of the occupant 'I of the residence, for the purpose of securing an audience with the occupant and engaging in or attempting to engage in a home solicitation transaction, if a card as described in Subsection (a) above is exhibited in a conspicuous place upon or near the main entrance to the residence, unless the visit is the result of a request made by the occupant. Sec. 20-62. Soliciting on City Property. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit on pro- perty owned by the City unless such person has entered into a license agreement with the City. (b) The City Manager is authorized to execute and enter into license agreements with solicitors authorizing the use of a tract, or portion thereof, of City property, where specific findings are made that the proposed use: (1) will not violate the provisions of the Uniform Traffic Act, art. 6701d, section 82(c) or section 42.03 of the Penal Code. (2) will not cause or contribute significantly to con- gestion on the public sidewalks so as to render access to abutting private property unreasonably inconvenient. PACE 6 f NO (c) The licensee shall pay a rental fee based upon square 4 footage. Sec. 20-63. Exemptions. The provisions of this article shall not apply to sale to dealers by commercial travelers or sales ants in thesusual course of business, calling upon or dealing with manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors or retailers at their places of business. SECTION II. That any person violating any of the provisions of t s or nance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00); and each day and every day that the provisions of this ordinance are violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. This penalty is in addition to and cumulative of., any other remedies as may be available at law and equity. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen aya from the date of its passage, and the Ci Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of thi y ' o be published twice in the Denton Record -Chronicle $ the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten I (10) days of the date of its passage. E PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1988. i i i R Mly~ ATTEST: JENNI E g R APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: PAGE 7 w I -i f k U-I IE= E Um L13:1= f L.I LLJ= 11-M 0:1~ LJLI= LJJE= N J ^ June 7, 1988 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM T0: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF ThE CITY COUNCIL FROM; Lloyd Harrell, City Manager SUBJ: CONSIDER AMENDMENT 7U CONTRACT- WATER PLANT UPGRADE, RESIDENT ENGINEERING SERVICES, $26,500, to Freese ~ Nichols, Inc., RECOMME~ION The public Utilities Board, at their meeting of May b, 1988, _ recommended to the City Council approval of the amendment to the contract to increase the maximum fee of $135,000 by $26,500, With the a pproval, the amended maximum fee will be 9161,500. SUMMAAY The existing contracts of $135,000 without w 3ttendeauthorizationsby i~he ~ityximFTeese ~ 1 and Nichols will be reaching this limit by April billing and the U'ity Staff would recommend their services through July. This necessitate the increase fn maximum fee. ' BACNGROUNp ~ ' The plant construction is ~ , change orders, the original completiongdate 1ofaJuneil3, 1982e has t been moved to July 28, 1988. ~ PRO_ GRANS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUAS AFFECTED ~ E ! City of Denton, Freese and Nichols, and the Citizens. ` ~ FISCAL IMPACT Original ccntract amount Amendment 3135,060 i __26, 500 Total ' $161,500 I Source of Funds: Water Bonds 623-DUB-0460-9101 i i t ~ i I k , i Page 2 Y 1e5pe ully.sub led L1 )y harr(e/j111 City anager Prepared by, t F Avid ham, Director hater/hastewater Utilities Approved by, Ne son, Executive Director Department of Utilities Exhibit I Letter from Freese b Nichols 11 PUB Minutes of May 4, 1988 Ili Ordinance { 5537U;3-4 1 i 4 M A: ?4 Y ~ x. 2342L NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT OF JULY 169 1985 BETWEEN THE CITY AND FREESE AND NICHOLS RELATING TO PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE UPGRADE OF THE CITY'S WATER TREATMENT PLANT; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: i SECTION I. That the City Council hereby approves and author zes t e ayor to execute the agreement between the City of denton and Freese and Nichols, Inc. providin for the Professional Engineering Services for the upgrade of the City's Water Tzeatment Plant under the terms and conditions contained in said agreement, a copy of which is attached and made a part hereof. SECTION II. That the City Council hereby authorizes the addit one expenditure of funds for the services rendsred under the contract not to exceed $26,500 (twenty-six thousand five hundred dollars). SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988. RAY O ATTEST: JENNIFER 9 CITY-grMETM APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: ,r i f 3 . 1 AMENDMENT NO. 1 CONTRACT NO. 85-144 PURCHASE OROCR NO.'S 69206 and 69207 AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AND FREESE AND VCHOLS, INC. FOR THE UPGRADING WATER TREATMENT PLANT STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON 1 The Agreement for engineering services entered into and on the 16th day of I! July, 1985, by and between the City of Denton and Freese and Nichols, Inc., shall be amended as set forth hereiounder. The said Agreement and related Purchase Orders are attached. SECTION I Authorization, over and above the amount of $135,000.00 authorized in Purchase Order No. 69207, for the expenditure of funds to extend Resident Representation, with the additional fee not to exceed $26,500.00. Method of payment shall be in accordance with Section F of Contract No. 85-144. SECTION II d All other provisions, covenants, recitals, terms and conditions of Contract No. 85.144 which are not expressly amended herein shall remain in full force and effect. The Contract Amendment No. I is executed in two counterparts, on this, the of 1988. ATTEST: CITY OF DENTON f OWNER ATTEST: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. ENGINEER PY: CMV/db075 i ` X THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF i § DENTON AND FREESE AND NICHOLS* INC. i i THIS CONTRACT entered into tLis #eK-s-, da of 1985, between the City of Denton, heraina c e t Owner, acting by and through Richard 0. Stewart, Ms or, duly authorized to act, and Freese and Nichols, Inc., Consulting Engineers, Fort Worth, Texas, hereinafter called the Engineer. WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the covenants and } agreements herein contained, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: 1. Employment of Eajtineer• The Owner hereby employs the Engineer and the ng neer agrees to perform professional services as herein set forth in connection with the construction of upgrading the Water Treatment Plant, hereinafter called the Project. 2. Character and Extent of En ineerin Services; The Engineer shall render engineering aecv cos or t e evelopment and construction of the Project, which shall include the following., A. Preliminary EnxinearinR Report Compile a preliminary engineerirg report in sufficient detail to identify the scope of the project and alternate solutions available to the City of Denton to include prolLsinary„-layouts, sketches:.:,and' estimates -of probable for econstngineerruct'ion recomme d tionthe s pr Ti act,repoand rt ewillforinclude investigation design acd analysis of the the existing proposed systems. The preliminary report will include the following; 1. Evaluation of an additional third intake line at the raw water intake structure to permit a wider variation in ,!apths from which the raw water is taken, a well as increase intake capacity. This will be possible if the level of Lake Lewisville is raised as planned by the Corps of Engineers. 2. Perform piezometer readinggs on the existing two parallel raw water pipe lines (a 27-inch installed in 1957 and a JO-inch installed in 1975) to determine the coefficlint of roughness of the pipes. This value will be used to determine maximum capacity and design pressure of the PAGE 1 } i f ' existing facilities and also will allow an evaluation of k the benefit of cleaning these lines. 3. Evaluation of existing raw water flow meters with a single flow meter suitable for field calibration and certification of raw water purchases to the. City of Dallas. 4. Investigate the use of an inline static mixer to replace the rapid mixer. Evaluation of existing chemical feed equipment and chemical storage facilities, to meet increased water production requirements. 5. Evaluation of modifications of the raw water channel to allow oven proportioning of flow between the flocculators and to accommodate the higher hydraulic loadings. 6. An&lysis of renovation of the existing Flocculators No. { 1-4 to include conversion from wet chain drive units to dry drives and refurbishing of Flocculators No. 5-8. Also included will be assessment of concrete deterioration in the basins and recommendations for repair and concrete protective coating systems. 7. Analysis of renovations to the existing sedimentation basins including evaluation and replacement, if necessary, of the four (4) oldest Clarifier Mechanisms No. 1-4 and refurbishing Clarifiers No. 5-8. Assessment will also be,-made of concrete deterioration in all basins and recommendations for repair and concrete protective coating systems will be made. 8. Conduct tracer studies through dye testing to determine the dispersion patterns of a dye tracer to evaluate the efficency and performance of the sedimentation and flocculation basins. The degree of short-circuiting can be determined by the tracer technique and determination of the standard, average and nominal detention times for each basin can be evaluated and recommendations made for modifications and baffling to improve basin efficiency and performance, retrofitting existing sedimentation basin with improved weir design, and evaluation and assessment of tube settler devices. 9. Recommendations for replacement of filter media with dual media and replacement of filter underdrain system, as necessary, in the eight (8) oldest Filters No. L-8. PACE 2 f I Investigation will also consider conversion to air assisted backwash system- 10. Investigation of modifications of pipe gallery including hydraulic analysis of connecting piping, ratty of flow controllers and valving to accommodate the increased flow. Consideration will be given for conversion from existing F hydraulic actuated valves to electric actuated valves. Consideration will also be givao to construction sequence to permit plant to remain in partial operation during pipe gallery modifications., 11. Assessment of new chlorination facilities including j se crate outside facilities for store of chlorine cylindore~ handling and weighing tacilities, new chlorinator building and new chlorinators, as necessary. i 12. Assessment of electrical renovations necessary including evaluation of existing switchgear and starters. The assessment will be performed in cooperation with the City of Denton's Electrical Department. 13. Assess and make recommendations for improvement to the existing instrumentation system, including improvements at the filter consoles to accommodate electric operators, control panel for turbidity recorders and annunciators or additional supervisory controls. 14. Evaluate the feasibility of providing for an on-site sludge holding lagoon to retain water plant sludge on site. 15. Recommendations for repair/replacement of existing sludga drawoff valves on all sedimentation basins. 16. Racommendatioas for replacement of control valves on High Service Pumps No. 1, 4 and No. 3 with electric control valves. 17. Recommendations for a new storage and shop building to accommodate plant storage and inhouse repair work on miscellaneous equipment. 18. Assessment of renovation and remodeling of existing roof and wall Leaks ~sremodeling of plaboratcrynand office facilities. I PACE 3 E 1 i f N I 19. Assessment of replacement/repair of 30-inch butterfly valve on existing 1 million gallon storage tank. 20. Prepare estimate of probable construction cost of all recommended improvements. 21. Furnish City twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary engineering report. 8. Desian Phase After receipt from the City of Denton of acceptance of the Preliminary Engineering Report, indicating any specific modifications or changes in scope desired by the City, and upon writteo authorisation from the City, the Engineer will proceed with the performance of services for the design phase as follows: j I. Prepare detailed plans and specifications including surveys, designs and layouts of improvements to be constructed and contract documents for the improvements. 2. the City rasarves the right to direct En inter to perform substantial revision of the pans and specifications, but in such event, the City shall pay Engineer just and equitable compensation for services rendered in making such revision(s). If revision(s) & ra required by reason of the Engineer's error or omission, then such revision(s) shall be made by the Engineer without additional compensation. This action may occur during design or conitruction phases; 3. Establish the scope of any soils and foundation investigations or special tests which may be necessary for the design of the project, and with the City's approval. Arran a for such investigations and testing to be conducted &r the City's account. 4. Submit plans, specifications and contract documents to the Texas Department of Health for approval. S. Prepare estimates of probable construction coat for the improvements. 6. Furnish the City twenty-five (25) sets of plant, specifications and construction documents. As directed are nnecespecifications and econstruction didocum4nts teas of in the receiving of bids for construction and as are required PACE 4 i E f ll be tin the he Engineer and shallh be pa de for byathe City rnished by C. Conatruction Phase Upon completion of the design phase services, approval of final plans and specifications, and upon written authori- zation from the City, the Engineer will proceed with the I performance and servieea in this phase as follows: i I. Assist the City in securing bids, issuing notice to bidders and notifying construction news publications. Notice to bidders will be furnished to the City for publication in to local news media. 2. Assist the City in the opening, tabulation and assess- ment of the bids receiveds and furnish recommendations on to award of the contract(s) or the appropriate actions to be teen by the City. 3. Assist in to preparation of formal contract documents for construction contracts. 4. Assist in conructing pre-construction conferences(s) with the contractor(a)s review construction schedules prepared by the contractor(s) and prepare a proposed eatimate of monthly cash requirements for the project. 5. Make visits to to site (as distinguished from the continuous services of a resident project representative) to observe the- progres• and the qual ty of work, and to attempt to dateroins in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the contract documents. 'In performing these services, the Engineer will endeavor to protect the City against defects and deficiencies in the work of contractors; the Engineer will report any observed defects or deficiencies immediately to the City; however, it is understood that the Engineer does not guarantee the contractor's performance nor is he responsible for supervision of the contractor's operation and employees. 6. Consult and advise with the City during construction, make recommendations to to City regarding the materials and workmanship, and prepare change orders for City's approval. 7. Chack and review samples, catalog data, schedules, ahup drawings, laboratory, shop and mill test of material and equipment and other data which the contractor is PAGE 3 f }ti V t required to submit for performance with the design concepts of the project and compliance with the r information given by the contract documents, and assemble written guarantees which are required by the contract documents. E f 8. Assist the City in arranging for testing of materials and laboratory controls during construction to be conducted at the City's expense. k 9. Interpret intent of the plans and specifications for the f City and contractor(s). 10. Review and comment on monthly and final estimates for payment to contractor(s). 11. Conduct, in company with City's reprasentative, a final ' inspection of the project, for compliance with the design concept of the project in compliance with the contract documents, and review and comment on the certification of completion and recommendation for final { payment to the contractor(s). t 12. Prepare revisions of construction drawings with the assistance of the City's pro act personnel and the construction contractor(s) reflecting changes in the project ~~made during construction. These "record asaone (1)hsetbofpreproduciblzs eandEngineer (2to the ) sets City prints. D. Additional Services Additional services to be psrforeed by the Engineer, if authorised by the City, which are not included in the above described basic services, are described as follows., 1. Provide shop, mill, field or laboratory inspection of materials and equipment. 2. Preparation of any required operation and maintenance manuals or conducting operator training or start up service. 3. Furnishing the services of a residential project representative to act as the City's on-site representative during the construction phase, it required by the City, under terms and conditions described in Section F of this Agreement. PACE 6 i I r' i 'r 4 i E. Compensation The Engineer shell be compensated for services rendered hereunder on the basis of salary cost times a multiplier of 2.2 plus other direct expenses times a Multiplier of 1.000 4 + with the total fee not to exceed $271,550.00 without written authorization of the City. Salcry cost is defined as the cost of salaries of t engineers, draftsmen, atenographrira, surveymen, clerks, I laborers, etc., for the time directly chargeable to the project, plus social security contributions. unemployment compensation insurance, retirement benefits, medical and insurance benefits, bonuses, sick leave, vacation and holiday pay applicable thereto. (Salary Cost is equal to 1.39 times salary payments. This factor is adjusted annually.) ' Other direct expenses shall include printing and reproduction expense, communication expense, travel, transportation and subsistence away from Fort Worth and other miscellaneous expense directly related to the work, including costs of laboratory analysis, tests, and other work required to be done by independent persons or agents other than staff members. Compensation will be made on the basis of monthly state- ments rendered to and approved by the City; however, under no circumstances shall any monthly statement for services exceed the value of work performed at the time a statement is rendered. The Consultant shall be entitled to a cm ulstlve amount not to exceed 85% of the maximum fee upon completion and submission of the plans, specifications and construction documents to the City. The remaining fifteen peieent (15x) of the maxinua fee shall be paid upon submission of monthly statements during the construction phase. If consy~tmoruction cont thebidsEngineerare exc ed c85tsof the mp.iiue afo.nt If construction bids are not received, payment to the Engineer shall not exceed 85% of the maximum fee. In either case (as described above), the Engineer will receivok payment within six (b) months after the City has received the final plans and speeifteations and contract documents. It is specifically understood and agreed that the Engireer shall not be authorized or required to undertake any work purcu3nt to this Agreement which would require additional PAGE 7 1 1r■{r ~ 1 V 1 payments by the City of any charge, expense, or reimburse- ment above the maximum fee as stated without having first obtained written authorization from the City. F. Resident Proiact Repro eneative ~ If the City elects to have the Engineer furnish the services r of a resident project representative to act as the City's 4 on-site representative during the construction phase, the j Engineer will furnish these services at a salary cost times a multiplier of 2.0, direct non-labor expenses shall be reimbursed at actual cost time a multiplier of 1.00. If e j resident project representative is required by the City, the services provided by the Engineer shall be as described in the attachment, "Duties, Repcnsibilities and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project Representative", at the ! City's written request and authorization. 0. Time of Coo lotion The Engineers shall submit the preliminary engieoring report within throe (3) months and shall submit plans and specifications and contract docuoonts within nine (9) months following authorization to proceed. H. Termination ! This Contract may be terminated at any time by the Owner, specified herein provided the Engineer a will be entitled to compensation for work performod prior to toruination. I. Arbitration No arbitration arising out of, or relating to this Agreement may include, by consolidation, joinder or in any other manner, any additional party not a party to this Agraement- J. Successors and AasiAneentsAssiAneents The Owner and the Engineer each binds himself, successors, executors, administrators and assigns to the other party to this Agreement, and to the successors, executors, administrators, and assigns of such other party in respect of all covenants of this Agreement. Except as above, neither the Owner nor the Engineer shall assign, sublet or transfer his Interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. PACE 8 4 ~ a fi Y K. Indemnification: ''usineer shall and does hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever, by reason of injury or property or third persons occasioned by any error, omission or negligent act of Engineer, its officers, agents, employees, invites, and other persons for whom it is legally liable, with regard to the performance of this ASremeat, and Engineer will, at its cost and expense, defend and prota.:t the City against € any and all such claims and demands. t This Contract is executed in two counterparts. IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, they have executed this Agreement, the day ! and year first above written. CITY OF DENTON* TEXAS, OWNER y BY: ATTEST: XLLW$ CM-SICKET C 0 DENTON, TEXAS I APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS FREESE ` NICHOLS, INC., ENGINEER BY: ~'tj VICE-PRESIDENT ATTEST: .T1i» /~QnyC? -XI PAGE 9 i I i V I t E EXCERPT Minutes PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD May 4, 1988 b. CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT- WATER PLANT UPGRADE, RES DEN ENGINEERING SERVICES, 26,5U0, to Freese h cos, inc. Hall introduced. The purchase order for the inspector at the plant has run out, ana the Utility needs to renew in order to retain his services to July 1988. I f Thompson made a motion to approve this item as presented. Second by Frady. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. i i i If I ! i i I I 1 i i { 5494U:1 I NET 4 I I ) I SIMON W. FRUW, PA. KW S R. N1O1pd, ►1. Reese FOUNT t Ngglf, Pi, AND ROI" s{io S )Ol PS 106lRT A. WINES. P.I. 1f.0ASrSON III, ►E. C KSIEN M. COOK, PAP 4f. I N T ANil10NY Rt .1. tut, N. Ifm37 Ff, CONSVLTING ENGINEERS GEORGEI HUMAN.Ff. "I WAS, ►.EW FINEST CLEMENT, r 1. 4 EEVN C. CMEAW, ►1, FRET L. FUMING rl A, LEE HEAD III, Pi RONNIE M. LEMONS. ► E. M16MRG MOROWN,►.l, C. DIANE FALWR.►E. ROBERT E KNCE. PX April 27, 1988 0^101 ~ n. )OH IN 1. PONES, ►1. THOMAS C. GOOCH. FF CARD N. CKODRE P1. MK>Wk L. NKMS, r.E. Mr. C. David Ham, P.E. Director of Water and ! Wastewater Utilities Service Center/Warehouse 901-A Texas Street Improvement Denton, Texas 76201 Re: City of Denton Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Phase II Resident Representation Dear Mr. Ham: Compensation for resident representation services for the referenced project is based on direct cost with established multipliers. Fees for these services may not exceed the amount of $ 135,000.00 without written authorization by the City of Denton. We will reach that limit with the billing for services at the end of the month of April. The contractor's work is continuing at the t plant site and It is anticipated that all work will not be completed until the contract completion date of July 28, 1988. We have considered the amount and nature of the work remaining to be completed in relation to the level of service required for the rimairier of the project. We would propose that Mike Nichols continue to work at the project site on a full time basis for the month of May. At the end of this time period, it is anticipated that the contractor will have completed all stru;:tural work, installation of all process equipment and all of the critical . ` TEtEP6EOME R171)bhN n1 LAAAAR STUtt 7OV WORM, MAS 761003 AIt ERO 6171L7~190p I I Ir 4l r l 'w r V i4 S Lette: to C. David Hari, P.E April 27, 1988 Page Two This work can continue to be performed on cost multiplier basis. It is e,sti,zated that authorisation for an additional $26,500.00 will be required to cover cost for these services as described ` above. I Sincerely, FREESE AND NICHOIS, Inc. R. A. Thomson III, P.E. xc: Lee Allsion _ Robert Nichols N Mike Nichols Shirley Kennener File DTN86246-4.41/125 IJ 4~ I 1v 11 1A I I rl i ~ A ~1 ti t F" i y: l j 11 ' i 1 6+4 7 i 4 1 r June 7, 1988 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City bIanager SUBJ: CONSIDER CHANGE IN TIME OF USE PEAK HOURS FROM 12 NOON TO 8 PM TU 1:30 PM to 8 PM. RECOMMENDATION The Public Utilities Board, at their meeting of March 9, 19b8, recommended to the City Council approval of the subject change. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND The Electric Department has a "Time of Use" rate which establishes a reduced demand charge of $3.25/KW/month vs normal $6,40/KW/month for the "off-peak" electrical demand. "On peak" demand charga is $9.75/Kh/month. This rate encourages customers to shift the electrical peak requirements off of Denton's peak electrical 1c,ad times. This "shifting" of peak can be accomplished by altering working shifts, scheduling events after the peak such as night time events, or by installing chilled water thermal storage systems whereby chilled water systems can be run at night, storing chilled water or ice in insulated tanks and using that for air conditioning the building the next day during the peak hours. It has been brought to our attention that our peak noon to 6:0(1 PM requires a very large storage system uanditends to discourage use of this rate and its subsequent beneficial effect on our efforts to shave our peak loads, studying our daily Therefore, after ~ could change our"peak load curves, we have determined that we still change the peak" hours to be 1:30 to 8:00 PM and 4 peak shaving we desire, PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED ' Denton Municipal Utilities, Uenton Citizens, Public Utilities Board, City Council, Customar Service Department, Finance f Department and Legal Department. 1 i (r f i -W - F N i FISCAL IMPACT Undetermined at this time. However, any increase of the load factor will result in a reduction in the fixed charges on the TMPA billings. Respectf y submitted, k Lloyd V Harrell ` City Manager PREPAR lAPPROVE51 8 Nelson, ~xecut ve rector o Utilities f ~F ' Exhibit I Ordinance f II hinutes PUB Meeting of 3/9/88 5366U:14 x r i i t F I1I I! , `r i EXCERPT FROM MINUTES PLHLIC UTILITIES BOARD March 9, 1988 5, CONSIDER CkANOE IN TFME-OF USE PEAK hOURS FROM 12 NOON TO 8 F'M 0 1:30 PM to B:OU PM. Tullos explained load management and load duration curves to the Board. Changing the peak hours would greatly reduce the cost to customers who use chilled water systems, like Peterbilt, Victor, etc., and plan to install thermal storage peak shaving systems. LaForte made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of an ordinance changing the peak hours as requested by Staff. Second by Thompson. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. k 1 i' i f 5396U:7 i Lr ~ Mr., 4 NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON AMENDING SCHEDULES TR, TP, AND TO OF THE SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE, AS ADOPTED BY tORDINANCE NO. 87-0271 TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN PEAK PERIODS FOR ENERGY CHARGES) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSt SECTION I. That Schedule TR (Residential Time of Use Rates r, Sc e u e TP (Primary Time of Use Rates), aA Schedule TG (General Service Time of Use Rates), of the Schedule of Rates for electrical service adopted by Ordinance 87-027 on February 30 1987, are hereby amended to provide for a change in the peak periods for energy charges from 12000 noon through 8100 p.m. to 1:30 p.m, through 8100 p.m., in accordance with the revised Schedules attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION II. That a copy of this ordinance shall be attached to Or nano, No. 87-027, showing the amendment herein made. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988. RAY STEPHENS, MAYOR ATTESTi t JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY f APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CIYY ATTORNEY I ' i J i!1, N I 1 SCHEDULE TR RESIDENTIAL. TIME OF USE RATES APPLICATION I Applicable to any customer for all electric service used for 1 residential purposes in an individual private dwelling or an individually metered apartment, supplied at one point of delivery and measured through ,--le meter, Customers applying for TR rate must remain on this rat,, for 12 continuous billing periods. Not applicable to resale service in any event, nor to tem- porary$ standby, or supplementary service except in conjunction with applicable rider. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Customer Facility Charge $10.00/30 days (2) Energy Charge Billing months of June through September: 1:30 p.m. through 8:00 p.m, (Peak Period) 10.25L~/KWH (Weekdays and excluding all City of Denton Holidays) All other hours (Off Peak Period) 4.5E/KWH Billing months of October through May: All KWH 4.50/KWH (3) Energy Cost Adjustment Schedule ECA MINIMUM BILLING Facility Charge TYPE OF SERVICE i The City will supply single-phase service (or three-phase 1 service if available at the point of delivery) at sixty (60) cycles and at any standard voltages available from the ' Cit s I dis tribution system through one standard transformation. Where j service of the type desired by the customer is not already sy available at the point of service, special contract arrangements between the City and the customer may be required prior to its being furnished. 3 i I PAYFENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance, SPECIAL FACILITIES ~K. All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually, Formula: i Actual days in reading period x customer charge I ENFROY COST ADJUSTMENT A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in E accordance with Schedule E.C.A, 9~L j Y j i L. i x G w t k i i SCHEDULE TP PRIMARY TIME OF USE RATES APPLICATION ` Applicable to approved electric service required for secondary distribution service at voltage levels not to exceed 69,000 volts, and billing demand equal to or greater than 750 KW. Customers applying for TP rate must remain on this rate for 12 continuous billing periods. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge $60.00/30 days r` (2) Energy Charge Billing months of June through September: 1:30 p.m. through 8:00 p.m. (Peak Period) 12.000/KWH (Weekdays and excluding all City of Denton Holidays) All other hours (Off Peak Period) 3.500/KWH I Billing months of October through May: All KWH 3.500/KWH (3) Demand Charge: No demand charge (4) Energy Coat Adjustment: Schedule ECA MINIMUM BILLING R i ; Facility Charge 1 TYPE OF SERVICE I At the City's available primary voltage and phase f PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. r! j i 4i j V w V t 1 SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet the customer's service requirements shall be provided "m• subject to special facilities rider. ±q, PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS 1^~ Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge i ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT I A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in E accordance with Schedule E.C.A. f s~ j i I , l i .S t i I 6 a~; T _ - i f I i SCHEDULE TG GENERAL SERVICE TIME OF USE rLATES APPLI N roved electric service required for Applicable to aPP a levels not to exceed Listomers ribution service at voltag ate secondary dist rate volts- for l2 continuous billingg, for a r must remain on this NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge Single Phase 10.00/30 days Three Phase 20.00/30 days (2) Energy Charge Billing months of June through September: ,m, Peak Period) 10.25)/KWH 1:30 p.m4 through 8s00 p (Weekdays and excluding all City of Denton I Holidays) 4.5E/KWH I~ All other hours (Off Peak Period) Billy inB months o?~er through Mays 4.5!/KWH All KWH No demand charge (3) Dembad Charge: Schedule ECA (4) Energy Cost Adjustment: MUM BILLING ! NI MI Facility Charge TYPE OF SERVICE I and Secondary service available to com erc servi a i dustrial o (or - customers. The City will supply single phase at eixt avdeliver ailable) from the if at at available any l standards v Ioint t ages of phase c s clesCeand (60) ' ' City's distribution system through °theseuatomer isnnotralready Where service of the type desired by available at the point of service, special contract arrangtements ats between the City and the customer may be required prior being furnished. I 0 i r i PAYMENT t{' Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid E within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings fr annually. I Formula: Actual days in reading period x customer charge % 3 ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT A charge per KWH of energy taken for fuel cost calculated in ' accordance with Schedule E.C.A. r F I . i ' { j t ~l i i k I i June 7, 1988 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL ' FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager RE: Ordinance Approving Contract with the Corps of Engineers for Non-Cost Shareable Ray Roberts Lake Recreation Costs. RECOMNIENDATION: The cities of Denton and Dallas have negotiated with the Corps and State on this issue and believe this contract is satisfactory. The Denton Utility Staff and Dallas Water Department Staff recommend approval of the contract. BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: The Corps of Engineers is requesting that Denton and Dallas enter into an agreement authorizing the Corps to design, bid and construct "non-cost shareable" recreation facilities on Ray Roberts Lake with Denton's share of such costs to be approximately $144,000, $10,900 to be paid immediately for design work and the remaining over approximately 24 months of contruction. The State of Texas will reimburse the City of Denton via progress payments as the construction is completed. In order to secure federal funding for the construction of Ray Roberts Lake, the cities of Denton and Dallas were required to sign recreational development contracts agreeing to pay for 501 of the recreational costs plus agreeing to maintain such facilities for 50 years. The cities have negotiated a contract with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to take over the cities' obligation of maintaining the recreation facilities provided such facilities are constructed to State standards and with the necessary facilities the State normally includes in their parks. This State provision includes engineering and construction of roads, parking, water, sewer and electric lines and fencing for ~a =v maintenance complex, a managing residence and a foreman's residence at both the Isle DuBois Park and the Johnson Branch Park. The State will pay for the maintenance complex and residences but not for the incidental improvements, and federal law prohibits the Corps from sharing in these improvements, i.e., these improvements are declared "non-cost shareable". I I , . E PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: City of Denton, Denton Utilities, Legal Department, Corps of ` Engineers, Tx Parks and Wildlife Department, City of Dallas. I FISCAL IMPACT: Denton's share of costs to be approximately $144,000 i $10,000 to be paid immediately for design work and the remaining over approximately 24 months of construction. Respectfully submitted, 1 affeVfrAk Hager PREPARED/APPR VEL BY: Nelson, . Executive Director of Utilities Exhibit I Ordinance ` II Letter May 20, 1988 from Corps of Engineers f III Pr-;;?sed Agreement between US Corps of Engineers and City of Denton " I j ~ I ` t F S517U:3-4 l .f 1 f i V 2352L i , NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF NON-COST SHARABLE RECREATION FACILITIES AT RAY ROBERTS LAKE; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THS'RE- FORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, j WHEREAS, in order to secure federal funding for the construction of Ray Roberts Lake, the Cities of Denton and Dallas are required to sign recreational development contracts with the United States ` Corps of Engineers; and r WHEREAS, the United States Corpa of Engineers has requested that the Cities of Denton and Dallas enter into an agreement authorizing the Corps to design, bid and construct "non-cost sharable" recre- ation facilities on Ray Roberts Lake; NOW THEREFORE, a THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: f SECTION I. That the City Council hereby approves and authorizes the aye or and city Secretary to execute and attest respectively, 1 the agreement between the City of Denton and the United States J Corps of Engineers providing for services under the terms and conditions being contained in said agreement which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION II. That the City Council authorizes the expenditure of un s in the manner and amount as specified in the Agreement. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988. RA O MYOR ' ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: i i l h AGREEMENT BETWEEN i 4 THE U.S. APMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS i DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND i THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF NON-COST SHARABLE RECREATION FACILITIES AT RAY ROBERTS LAKE u I THIS AGREEMENT IS MADE AND ENTERED INTO THIS day of J 198_1 between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army, United States of America (hereinafter referred to as the "Corps") and the City of Denton, Texas (hereinafter called the "City"); WHEREAS, the construction of the Ray Roberts Lake project (hereinafter called the "Project") was authorized by the Rivers and Harbor Act of October 1965; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Regulation 1165-2-400, as amended, specifies the cost-sharing requirements applicable to the recreation facilities for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City has undertaken to provide the items of cooperation for the Project, pursuant to the Recreation Development (Contract No. i ' DACW63-80-C-010)) for the Project, dated 15 August 1980, between the Corps and the City; and WHEREAS, the City has requested the Corps to design the non-cost sharable roads and utilities and to incorporate these facilities in the 5 1 ' X J r r; , i N I construction of the Project, "hich facilitates the providing of local cooperation; and WHEREAS, the City has offered to pay the Corps for the necessary design effort for the non-cost sharable roads and utilities, and has offered to pay the construction cost of the above non-cost sharable roads and utilities to accommodate the City's requests as listed below; and WHEREAS, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department will design the non-cost j sharable buildings as requested by the City; and WHEREAS, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to accept contributed funds for the purpose outlined herein by the Civil Functions Appropriation Act of 1938 (50 Stat 518), 33 USC 701h. Y ~ s` f. NOW9 THEREFORE, to advance the public interest and implement the 40 7 'k payment of the aforesaid monies to the United States, the Corps and City P inn fA i ~ 4 agree as follows: i~~,i 1. The Corps agrees to: y4z, a. Develop the final contract plane and specifications for the `141 non-cost sharable recreation roads and utilities in Johnson 9ranch and isles duBois Parke at Ray Roberts Lake, as listed in detail on Exhibit A. b. Include construction of the non-cost sharable buildings, s 11,2 roads, and utilities, as mentioned above, in their advertisement for construction of recreation facilities for the Project. ~y c. Prepare, advertise and award a contract following the effective ' ? date of this agreement, d. Provide the City with results of any bid openings, and upon ascertaining their share of the bid amount, advise them of the initial -2- YI t 5, y r actual amount of funds required for the City's portion of the cost for f construction of the non-cost sharable facilities. 2. The City agrees for a. Pay the Corps $10.000 within 30 days after this agreement is executed, that amount to be payment for the City's portion of the cost for design of roads and utilities as described in paragraph la. The payment shall be made to the "Finance and Accounting Officer, USACE, Fort Worth" and mailed or otherwise delivered to the Finance and Accounting Officer, Fort Worth District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, P. 0. Box 17300, Fort Worth, Texas 76102-0300. b. Sear 26 percent of the construction coat for the non-cost sharable recreation facilities described in paragraph Id; this cost shall be determined by the Corps and shall be based on the bid amounts for the awarded construction contract and any subsequent contract modifications. c. Provide the Government, over the term of construction, the amounts required as stated in paragraph 2b, including an amount equal to j 6.5 percent of the City's portion of the construction cost for the super- vision and administration of the nos-cost sharable buildings, roads, and utilities during construction. The current Government estimate for the City's portion of the construction costs for the non-cost sharable roads and utilities is 9144,000 which Includes the amount for the supervision and ! administration as mentioned above. d. Provide payment, within 30 days after notification of bid opening by the Corps, of the anticipated construction cost, as specified in paragraph 2b, and the supervision and administration coat, as specified in -3- f a t}1 1 i paragraph 2c. Payment shall be made to the "Finance and Accounting Officer (FAO), USACE, Fort Worth" and mailed or otherwise delivered to the FAO, Fort Worth District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Sox 17300, Fort Worth, Texas, 76102-0300. g. Add to the said amount, such additional sums as the District Engineer may require within thirty (30) days after notice is sent by the District Engineer to the City as to the estimated amount of the City's por- tion of any additional sums required for construction of the non-cost 1 sharable recreation. 3. It is mutually agreed: a. That the Corps procurement policies, administrative proce- dures, and regulations will apply to the construction contracts as it does In normal Corps administered contracts. All directions and instructions to the construction contractors will be provided by the Corps. b. That the Corps will develop the final contract plans and spec- cifications for the recreation facilities, including the City's request on the non-cost sharable recreation as stated in paragraph 1. c. The City will bear 26 percent of the total cost of added work l and increased project costs including claim and appeal costs arising from said work. The City is not liable for damages due to the fault or negli- gence of the Corps or its contractors. e N r i IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Corps and the City have executed this 3 agreement as of the day month and year written above. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Department of the Army BY JOHN E. SCHAUFELBEROER Colonel, Corps of Engineers District Engineer II ~ y'+ Date The City of Denton, Texas E i i BY ~ ! b City of Denton, Texas 1 x i i I Y f : { , i f i NON-COST SHARABLE FEATURES TO BE FUNDED BY DALLAS d DENTON ITEMS OF WORx Iale DuBois Park Johnson Branch Park Maint, Manager's Foreman's Maint, Manager's Foreman's Com lex Residence Residence Com lex Residence Residence Roads 6 Parking X X X X X Fencing X X X X Water Line X X X X Sever Line X X X X x X X X X X X Electric Line X X X x X X ESTIMATED COSTS j Facilities $174,563 Contingencies, 151♦ 25,437 $259,124 j 38,876 G Total, Construction Vi 200,000 2980000 i, E&D SgA 15,000 21,000 140000 21,000 I Grand Total $229,000 $340,000 ` r1T~ry~1 ~r NOTES: Ra i The $36,000 total for Engineertng 6 Design must be paid to the Corps by Dallas ;i ($26,000) and Denton ($10,000) before initiation of design work, i r ~ ~'y: h ti t> P s ! I ,kM `4 I r r' a Exhibit A w' i p " T.r i CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY I, , do hereby certify that I am the City Ti Attorney of the City of Denton, Texas, that the City of Denton, I Texas, is a legally constituted public body with full authority and legal capability to perform the terms of this Agreement between the United States of America and the City of Denton, Texas, and that the person who has executed this agreement on behalf of the City of Denton, Texas, has acted within his statutory authority. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have made and executed this Certificate this day of 1998. City Attorney 4 4 Texas State Bar License Number r y k1 t _ it ti i i i f 'I 1 ' i tf j r y r f i June 7, 1988 i CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Lloyd Harrell, City Manager t SUBJ: CUNSIUER CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF LAND ROBERTS MATER TREATMENT FOR THE NEW PLANT, APPROXIMATELY 36.86 CRRAY FROM ALFRED G. COULTER AND QFE, GRACE LENA A ES (Seller), $230,500, COULTER REL'OMMENDATION: The Staff recommends approval of this contract. I SUMMARY: bf The contract for the Nebletts has been a Council on May loth, 1986, pppres by the t City 1 of the remainder of they 79 acres ntmentinedi~ts thae backup ( provided for the May 10th City Council meetin. portion 12 acres (approximately) is proposed to have ache remaining purchase from Mr, and Mrs. Coulter b option to two years, by the City within the next From the date of signing this contract, the City will have ninety (90) days to verify the survey and soil conditions. The Staff has already initiated this work, BACKGROUND: The proposed purchase Is necessary for the construction of the Ray Roberts water treatment plant and 79 acres is sufficient to expand the plant to l0U million gallons init'3I capacity will be, however, 10 MGU, C' day (MGD), The PROGRAMS DEP I ARTMENIS OR GROUPS_AFFECTEU: City of Denton, Mr, and Mrs, Coulter, Legal Department. FISCAL`. IMPACT: Estimate total land 31 acres Neblett purchase 96000000 j (31 x $4,000) (prroperty 36.88 Acres Coultes'o property CC 5/10/88) 124,000 _230,SU0 j balance available for 48 acres t (Coulters) and 10 acres (Vaughn- booster Pump Site) I 92as,sao Source of Funds: hater bonds 623-006-0460-9101 5544U;1-2 1 I b i 1 Page 2 i a i Respectfully submitted, Lloyd arre City Manaaer k "G Prepared by: ogeQrnso n " Right of Way Agent go ed by: 'rtix e son Executive Director of Utilities r, Exhibit 1 Proposed Contract II Location Map Ordinance ~ + I i a , I i , e ' ; ro l~ 2312L NO. i I 1 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT PROVIDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN f FROM ALFRED G. COULTER AND GRACE LENA COULTER FOR THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR THE CITY'S WATER PLANT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas approves the Contract of Purchase of Real Property providing for k the purchase of that certain real property described in said con- tract attached hereto, by the City of Denton, Texas from Alfred G. Coulter and Grace Lena Coulter, in the amount of Six Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($6,250.00) per acre, in accordance with the terms and conditions o said contract. SECTION II. That the City Council authorizes the expenditure• of fun- sTnn We amount specified in said contract for the purchase of said real property and authorizes the Mayor to execute any and all documents necessary to consummate said purchase. SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. c'.. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988. r,. i RAY STEPHENS, HAM'""- ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTZKSj CITY MY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY A, 1- 4-4 BY $ /flXaCl1 f f i 2312L THE STATE OF TEXAS § CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE COUNTY OF DENTON § OF REAL PROPERTY 1. Parties. ALFRED 0. AND WIFE (Seller aj' g to sell and con eTy to the CITY O GCE FD DENLENA CTEXAS OUL ERB municippal corporation of the State of Texas (Buyer), the property Ooscribed below, 2• Pr- Seller agrees to sell to Buyer all that certain pp real property (the Property) situated in the Cit 3 County of Denton, State of Texas Y of Denton, I attached hereto and incorporated herein abybreferencexhibit ed' however that the parties recognize that no current survey Property exists and that the exact acreage included within the Property owned by Seller to be conveyed may be s the acreage as described herein, and the more or lees than y~ exact acreage and the boundaries of the Property which is to be k f conveyed hereund,,r to Buyer shall parties agree that the accordance with a current aurvel be hereafter determined in y performed as provided herein. r ' 3. Escrow A ant. Title Use Insurance Corporation, 531 :forth s, Locust treet, ty of Denton escrow agent an,J the Purchaser Texas, is hereby designated as ! shall pay the escrow fee, if any, on execution of this agreement, Contract Sales Price. The total salsa price for the Pro- party y a a e 5 Co 11 , 1, . 111111:1111 111 1:1 tity o), per acre, w c sum s a e t e so acompeneat on f+ due a er for any and all claims of an 8 Y description whatever arising out of the Buyer a acquisition or use of the property for N' public purposes, The total salsa rice edin the Property shall be determi ed byl applying the thee8er 5 acreage b price to the total acreage included within the property owned by Seller in accordance with a current survey of the Property obtained as provided herein. The total sales price is !};k' to be paid to the escrow agent as follows: (a) One Thousand Dollars ' of this contract b (61,000,00) on the execution money, Y both parties, as earnest (b) The balance in cash or certified or cashier's check at closing on delivery to the escrow agent of a general warranty deed with full covenants, duly executed in proper form for recording so as to convey to the Buyer a good and marketable record and title to the Property free and clear ~i E k f 4 V I FFC i f ! of all recorded and unrecorded liens, assess- ments leases, taxes, and encumbrances, I restrictions, and conditions, except public easements and rights-of-way of record. y S. Closing Date. The transactions shall be closed on or before ninety calendar days from the date of acceptance of this agreement by the Seller and Buyer, or at such other time as the parties may mutually agree, at the office of the escrow agent or at such other location as is mutually agreeable to the parties ' herein. 6. Survey. A survey of the Property shall be obtained within sixty (OTTays of the offective date of this agreement by the Buyer, at the Buyer's expense, to be performed by a Registered a 'A Public Surveyor licensed by the State of Texas. A plat of the survey together with any appropriate field notes shall be furnished to Seller and Buyer prior to closing. The survey shall locate all improvements, encroachments, property lines, and all easements and roadways adjoining or crossing the property. The total sales price for the Property shall be determined by the exact acreage as shown on the survey furnished. i 7. Soil Conditions. The parties recognize that Buyer intends J to use the roperty for the construction of a water treatment plant, and that the Property will only be suitable for such use if the soil or geological conditions on the property are ' acceptable for such use. The parties agree that the Buyer, its a ents or representatives, shall have ninety (90) days from the effective date of this agreement to enter upon the Property and to perform such work and teats as may be necessary to determine the existing soil and geological conditions of the Property. Should the Property not have suitable soil or geological conditions for the intended use as solely determined by the Buyer, the Buyer maYi notwithstanAn$ any other provision of this agreement, terminate this contract by giving written notice to ti L the Seller at any time prior to the closing date, and any earnest money paid by Buyer shall be returned to Buyer. ~..A, 8. Title Insurance Po~lic~. The Seller agrees, prior to the closing, to procure at tie Buyer's cost, from Title USA Insurance Corporation or another title company of Seller's choice acceptable to the Buyer, a preliminary title report agreeing to ensure marketable title to the Buyer in the full amount of the purchase price. 9. Effect of Defective Title. Should the title prove defective in the opinion o t o Buyer's attorney, then such defect shall be pointed out in writing by letter delivered to the yLtiLZ~ ~ PAGE 2 Seller after the delivery of such preliminary title report, and the Seller shall have thirty (30) days thereafter in which to cure such defects or, if agreed to by Buyer in writing, prior to closing. 10. Inability to Conve Title. In the event Seller is unable to convey goo an mar stable record and title to the Property as provided for herein in the opinion of the Buyer, then this agreement shall terminate and any amount tendered by Buyer shall be returned to Buyer. 11. Fees Charges and Costs. The Buyer shall pay all recording tees, title searc es, reconveyance fees, trustees' fees, forwarding fees for any full reconveyance of any deed of trust, and the premium charged for any policy of title insurance arising out of this transaction. Seller shall be responsible ~J for the payment of all delinquent ad valorem property taxes, along with penalty and interest thereon, and the payment of ad valorem taxes for the current tax year, prorated to the date of closing. 12, Default, If Buyer shall fail to comply with any provision of this agreement. Seller may terminate this contract and receive the Earnest Money as liquidated damages. If Seller shall fail to comply with any provision of this agreement, other than the requirement to cure defective title, Buyer may either terminate this agreement and receive the Earnest Money previously paid, or enforce specific enforcement of this agreement. 13. Possession. The possession of the Property shall be T`f delivers t3 to uyer at closing. 14. Integration. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement eetween the parties and neither party relies upon any warrants or representation not contained herein. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this agreement on the day of , 1488. CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS, PURCHASER BY. RAY 5 E , MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PACE 3 ATTEST: JENNIFER W R , APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: ALFRED G. COULTER AND GRACE LENA " ' COULTER, SELLERS BY: UL BY:~ THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF DENTON 4 r, . i This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day j of , 148E by Ray Stephens, Mayor of the City of Denson,- Texas, a Municipal Corporation, on behalf of said Municipal Corporation. My Commission expires: i PAGE 4 { J 1 T~ T f I i THE STATE OF TEXAS g COUNTY OF DENTON g This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of 1988 by Alfred G. Coulter. e . ROGER N. VYIIKINSON ~Ilr bra iiwly#ii'~ V~J rsNOTARYjUUBLIC0 STATE OF TEXAS My Commission expires: THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON g This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ~ day of , 1988 by Grace Lena Coulter. ROGER N. VALKINSON ` NOTAR))FUBLIC9 STATE; OF TEXAS My Commission expires: _4 i PAGE S f d I I,a is M1 6X~[y . t'. f~ M1 ALL that certain lot, tract or parcel of land lying and being situatated in the city and County of Denton, State of Texas, and being part of the Sylvester Williams survey, Abst. No. 1322, and also being part of a tract of land as conveyed to ll Alfred G. Coulter and wife Grace Lena Coulter by deed dated F January 22, 1953 and recorded in Volume 383, Page 552 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said Coulter tract said i point lying at the east corner of a tract conveyyed to the United States of America by deed dated September i5, 1981 and s recorded in Volume 1101, Page 702 deed records of Denton e County, Texas; THENCE south along the east boundary line of said Coulter east boundary line, same being the west right-of-way line of a north and south county road known as kcReynolds, a distance of 600,0 feat, more or less, to a point for a corner; THENCE west, a distance of 310 feet, more or less, to a point for a corner in an existing north and south fence; THENCE south, along and with the general course of said fence a. part of the way passing the end of said fence and continuing a total distance of 1,668.739 feet to a point for a corner, said point lying in the south boundary line of said Coulter tract and in an east and west road known as Burger road; THENCE west, along the south boundary line of said Coulter tract and in said road a distance of 656.7021 feet the southeast corner of a tract conveyed to Sheila Sue Yarbrough, et al by deed recorded in Volume 1978, Page 793 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE north along the west boundary line of said Coulter tract a distance of 2,116.77 feet more or less to the northwest corner of said Coulter tract same being the southwest corner of said U.S.A. tract for a corner; THENCE north 810 OS' 03" east along the north boundary line of said Coulter tract, same being the south boundary line of said U.S.A. tract, a distance of 980.SS feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 36.6874 acres, more or less. 0535E/7 0 I rG G~ E ~Y ti ti t 1 t f r 1 i F V i Y 1 i I r II 1 1♦ .j , N I ` W Ij CITY of DENTON DENTON, TE US 76201 Y M E M O R A N D U M T0: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager I ~ DATE: June 3, 1988 SUBJECT: Acquisition of land at the Wastewater Treatment Plant I he have received a contract from the owners of the property. ' The contract is not in our legal form and requires some earnest a, money. As this is not our normal procedure, this ordinance would allow us to work out all of those details to the mutual [ agreement of all involved before the property is purchased. "r 1 Ribk'Sveh -a Deputy City Manager jw/4091M ~ I 1 i r f ~ ~ I . M.~ M1 .yy1{ I ~1 1 `'l 4 l 11 r1 r rrfi i I i ~ #j 2362L i i NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND D. J. ANDERSON FOR THE PURCHASE OF 84.8193 ACRES OF LAND ADJACENT TO THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT; E AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas here aut or zea the City Manager to execute a contract between the City Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000 00) Anderson, the purchase amount of 84.8193 acres of land adjacent to the City's existing Wastewater Treatment : Plant. SECTION II. That the City Council authorizes the expenditure of fun s-3- not to exceed Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000,00) , for the purchase of said real property and authorizes the City Manager to execute any and all documents necessary to consummate said purchase. SECTION III, That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. a, PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1988, MAYOR RAY STEPHrNS, ATTEST: ;r APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY I BY: 10 i } r t b! S. A 1 1 e i 1 l iy4 i j i l Q I3 i 1 i I I i l r 2280L V NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR ONE-WAY I TRAFFIC NORTHBOUND ON THE EAST FRONTAGE ROAD OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35-E, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH MAYHILL ROAD TO THE SOUTHERN CITY LIMITS, A DISTANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 5,750 FEET; ONE-WAY TRAFFIC SOUTHBOUND ON THE WEST FRONTAGE ROAD OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35-E FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH STATE SCHOOL ROAD TO THE SOUTHERN CITY LIMITS FOR A DISTANCE OF 5,450 FEET; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; FROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00); AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I i THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the east frontage road of Interstate Highway -TY-7E, from its intersection with Mayhill Road to the southern city limits, a distance of approximately 5,750 feet, is hereby restricted to one-way traffic travelling north. SECTION II_ That the west frontage road of Interstate Highway -T -'From its intersection with State School Road to the southern city limits, a distance of 5,450 feet, is hereby restricted to one-way traffic travelling south. SECTION III. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, cause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or app 11 cation thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent ,jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the Citq of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION IV. That when signs are erected giving notice thereof; any person violating cny of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and punished by a fine not to exceed Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00). SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective fourteen days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official newspaper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. I I ' 1 PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of -i_► 1988. RA STEPHEN , YOR ATTEST: Y jENN 1 ~ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCHp CITY ATTORNEY BY k i W T 1 j.. 2 3 , LAC iY Y1,~ ~ ' . COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ENOIN[ER-OMECTOR ` ROBERT C. LAWk CKAAFAAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION R. E. STOMA. JR. f!` ROURTM.BASS 2624 W. Prairie 4 RAY STOKER, JR. Denton, Texas 76201 Hey 19, 1988 IN REPLY REFER TO Controls 0196-01 Highways I.H. 35E Denton County Hr. Lloyd Harrell City Manager f Municipal Building Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Mr. Harrell: This letter is to request that the City of Denton pass an ordinance designating that the I.N. 35E frontage roads, from State School Road to the south city limits, be made to operate with one-way traffic. The State is in the process of reconstructing I.H. 358 from Corinth Street to Turbeville Road and during the construction of this project, it is proposed to make the frontage roads one-way from State School Road to near Lake Lewisville. One-way operation of the frontage roads is considered necessary primarily from a safety standpoint. Your consideration of this request is appreciated. Sincerely, Dwight S. Bird Resident Engineer DSB:jf i a I I I February 8, 1988 page 2 of 3 pages r On Thomas street, 100 ft. north of Scripture, east side a on Thomas street, 100 ft. south of Panhandle, west side On Old Bonnie Brae, 40 ft. north of Scripture, east side On Old Bonnie Bcae, 4D ft. south of Bonnie Brae, west side on Bonnie Brae, 110 ft. south of Panhandle, west side On Bonnie Bras, 40 ft. south of Old Bonnie Brae, east side A 30 mph speed limit sign is to be posted at the end i of speed zone on all directions. Gilbert Bernstein seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. ITEM Y4 REQUEST FOR NO P&RK[NG ON THE WEST SID8 OP RINEY ROAD' Paul Iwuchukwu presented the request. He said the YMCA is requesting an ordinance for no parking on the west side of Riney Road beginning from Windsor Drive to a point 827 ft, north of Windsor. This section of Riney Road is only half paved now with the east edge of pavement being the centerline of proposed paving. When cars are parked on the west aide of Riney, the remaining width of pavement dose not provide adequate capacity for two-way traffic. Riney Road is a collector street as per city classification, and normally, all collectors are supposed to have parking on one or both sides as the situation may warrant. As a result, staff is recommending approval for No Parking on this section of Riney Road with a condition that the "No Parking" be removed as soon as the full width of pavement is installed for this section of Riney Road. Virginia Gallian asked how long was "temporarily", Paul said approximately 2 years or until Riney is paved to its full width within subject area. Doug Chadwick made a notion to accept staff recommendation of no parking on the west side of Riney Road beginning from Windsor Drive to a point 827 ft. north of Windsor. Virginia Gallian seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. ITEM M5 ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH ONE-WAY TRAFFIC NORTHBOUND_ AND SOUTHBOUND ON THE TWO FRONTAGE ROADS (I35E1' Paul lwuchukwu presented this request. He said it was originated by minute order #84908 on I-35E from it i page 3 of 3 pages the Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation and van deliberated on at the Traffic safety meeting of October 6. 1986 (minutes and Minute Order enclosed). The Minute Order was for the Cities - of Denton, Corinth, Lake Dallas nd Hickory Creek and Denton County to agree to cooperate in the conversion of the frontage roads to one-way operation from State School Road in the City of Denton to Turbeville Road j in Hickory Creek and Lake Dallas, consistent with the planned improvements to Interstate Highway 35E. 135E will be widened to six lanes from Turbeville Road in Hickory Creek/Lake Dallas to Corinth Road in Corinth. The State feels the service roads need to be one-way a certain distance in advance to support these improvements. E in the October 6, 1986, Traffic Safety meeting, area businesses asked the commission to adopt the resolution of the minute Order but to delay the effective date of one-way operation until the project is ready to begin. Since then, all the other cities and the County have passed the necessary ordinance for one-way operation on the frontage roads. Staff is recommending approval for an ordinance to establish one-way operation on the frontage toads to support the planned improvements on 1-353. Since the project is already in progress, the effective date of the ordinance will be as soon as appropriate signs and pavement markings are installed. Virginia Gallian asked Paul how far they had progressed. He said they were working on the Hickory Creek preliminary signing and pavement markings. Gilbert Bernstein made a motion to establish one-way operation on the frontage roads. Doug Chadwick seconded the motion. Notion was unanimously approved. ITEM #6, GENERAL BUSINESS: a. Paul Iwuchukwu presented the commission with a map showing the location of the signal light at the T.I. driveway @ Highway 77. b. Virginia Gallian asked if an intersection warning sign could possibly be posted at Loop 288 and Aidra. Paul said he would have to check with the State Department. c. Virginia Oallian asked if the markings on the Square would be painted, especially the turn lane indicators. Joe Thompson said they wore off when sand was used during the ice storm and that they would be repainted. Meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m. f i N t October 6, 1986 page 5 of 8 pages r get to the gas pumps. He said they had proposed to close number 3 and eliminate one curb cut on Carroll Boulevard. Closing two driveways would cut down on business. He said they had talked to one of the gas companies in Denton, Texas and they have withdrawn their offer because of the situation. Mr. Hashemi said he would appreciate the commission's consideration in leaving curb cut number 2. John Thompkins asked the staff if one was traveling north coming from the south on Carroll, assuming driveway number 2 was closed, what was the possibility of making a left turn across Hickory into driveway number 1. Would that present a danger? { ` Jerry Clark said no. i Mohammed Hashemi said according to Section 8, Article I 3 of the Denton Code certain requirements could be made for truck delivery of gas and food. He said for a convenience store and gas station to operate they would need access number 2. i j STAFF RECOMMENDED : Denial of request 1 COMMISSIONERS: Virginia Oallian made a motion to except the staff recommendation that driveway number 2 and 3 or 4 be closed. Doris Chipman seconded the motion. It passed f unanimously. ITEM N5 VIEW OBSTRUgTION AT JUCK111Q= 0 SMALLEY: F Paul Iwuchukwu said the obstruction had been cut by the City staff to ground level. The staff wanted to present this information to the commission. ITEM #6 14INUTE ORDER #94908 ON I3S E FROM TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: Jerry Clark presented the request. He said David Salmon recently attended a meeting held by the State Department for all surrounding cities. The State proposed to widen I3S in conjunction with the Boeing plant from Turbeville Road in Hickory Creek/Lake Dallas to Corinth Road in Corinth. They feel the most cost effective way of doing it would result in widening the road at the same time to 6 lanes. They ate stating that they would not be using those lanes until 1992, so the SDH 5 PT will button them off. The affect it has on the City of Denton would be from Shady shores road to Mayhill and State School road. The service roads would be changed to one way. We feel it would be important to help the neighbor cities to the south of us. There could be a possibility that the widening of the road would go as far as Highway 77 north of Denton in 1992. page 6 of 8 pages T Jerry said everyone in the area had been notified by y handbill. The staff was not given enough time to notify them in any other way. Curtis Hawley from Oakmont Subdivision came forward. He said he was not speaking in opposition. Oakmont { owns all the property on the west side with the exception of the car dealerships along the frontage road. Had the City of Corinth approved the t proposal? Jerry Clark presented Mr. Hawley a copy of the memo from Corinth approving it. S Larry Benson, president of Triangle Chevrolet came i3 forward. He said his company was part of the North Texas Auto Plex located on the service road between the State School Road and Shady Shores road currently on 13 acres. They plan in the near future to develop another 14 acres into an automotive area. Within a period of time, they would have a total of 27 acres in the area to better serve the citizens of Denton. Mr. Benson said changing the access road to one way going south would severely hamper the sales and service needs of the citizens of Denton. Thane was only one exit off 135 to gat Into the Shady Shores area and into the Auto Plex. He reiterated that he was against changing the service road to one way. ( Lewis Smith, a representative from the sales and service department of the North Texas Auto-Flex came - forward. He was in agreement in having the freeway come further up but was not in agreement with changing the service road to one way. There was plans to add more franchises north and south of the Auto-Plex making it the sole employer in that area. For the last few months, they have been one of the top 5 Oldsmobile dealerships in sales throughout the United States. The vast majority of their employees and customers ace from Denton. They want to continue to allow them good access into the Auto-flex. R.J. Button came forward. He said he was the owner of Lakewood Estates and Lakewood Manufacturing home sales at the cornet of Mayhill road/State School road and 135. He also owned property in the Corinth area. All the service roads would ultimately be one way. If the State was going to widen stretches of the road in the middle to six lanes, but not use it for some period of time, it would only seem that the changing of the service coda could be delayed as wall. One way traffic does hurt businesses and any delay could be helpful. 1622L a s R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, on Interstate Highway 3SE, from north of Hickory t Creek to U. S. Highway 77 south of Denton, in Denton County, Texas, a project is presently included in the 5 Year Development Schedule of the 10 Year Project Development Plan for widening the existing facility; and WHEREAS, increasing industrial development in tha immediate area of Farm to Market Road 2181 mandates that special attention be given to Interstate Highway 35E in the Denton, Corinth, Hickory Creek and Lake Dallas area; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that imminent improvements to interstate Highway 3SE would require the conversion of the frontage roads within the Cities of Denton, Corinth, Lake Dallas and Hickory Creek from two-way to one-way operation; and r WHEREAS, new points of access along an Interstate Highway require Federal Highway Administration Washington, D.C., Office approval; NOW9 THEREFORE, i f BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS: SECTION I. That the City of Denton agrees to cooperate In the conversion of the frontage roads along Interstate Highway 35E, from State School Road to the City limits, to one-way operation. SECTION II. That the City of Denton further requests the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation to proceed with project development through right-of-way acquisition and construction on Interstate Highway 35E inside the corporate limits of the City of Denton including any necessary interchanges and ramp improvements. SECTION Iii. That the City of Denton agrees, upon receipt of written notice from the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, to adopt an ordinance converting the highway frontage roads to one-way traffic. I V r SECTION IV. By means of this Resolution, the City of Denton hereby accepts Minute Order No. 84908 of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation for District No, 18, Denton County, dated August 28, 1986. SECTION V. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 1.1 day of 1986. i 5 RAY STEPHENS, INUA OR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS i ATTEST: CITY OF DENTONO TEXAS I 1 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BY: 2- PAGE 2 1 1 I I 11 i ~n E JiJ i J y 1 • r; e h DATE: June 7, 1988 C } CITY COUNCIL REPORT' TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT'S REGIONAL All). QUALITY ADVISORY CONIN:1TTEE'S OUTLINE OF LEGISLATIVE STRATEGY FOR CLEAN AIR ACT RECOMMNDAT'ION: Adoption of the resolution. SUMMARY: Adoption of this resolution would be consistent with the actions taken by several other governments and organizations in our region, particularly those represented on the Air Quality Advisory Committee. The City of Denton and Denton County have worked very closely within this committee to devise a strategy and plan for solving, as much as possible, problems associated C with ozone and other air quality issues. Our county has been the first outside of Dallas and Tarrant within the North j Central Texas area or CMSA to be measured and placed in the 1 non-attainment category. Denton's contributions to the emissions problem are related to mobile or vehicular sources (we generate approximately 3.2% of the total area traffic voluma). The Texas Air Control Board and EPA have submitted and considered a State Implementation Plan (SIP) which will require at a minimum control measures such as a county-wide vehicle inspection/maintenance program and other traffic improvements such as signal synchronization and turn lanes. Control measures in effect or planned for Dallas, Fort Forth, Houston, and other areas can impact local economies and economic development efforts. Congress is considering proposed amendments to the Clean Air Act, and the EPA continues to threaten non-attainment areas with sanctions. Texas legislators have asked for a unified strategy, and the one proposed In this resolution has been discussed with Houston, E1 Paso, and other areas of the state. A meeting will be held in Austin on June 2 to further discuss a statewide strategy, and Staff will report on whether it conflicts with this resolution in any way at the Council meeting. i l F i i Mayor and Members of the City Council June I, 1968 Page 2 BACKGROUND; t The monitor which measured a Denton County ozone level in excess of EPA standards was originally placed five miles from the Denton/Dallas County boundary in 1961. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: All citizens and residents. FISCAL INIPACT: 1 Undetermined. ;RE PECTF Ll' SUBMITTED; U y arrel City Manager Prepared by: { ~.r ~-c~p UlI I ; ~ av son { Assistant to the City Manager E Approved, oy arre City Manager I t 4062M/bw i ,r 1 r 2338L A 9 RESOLUTION NO. t A RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE OUTLINE OF LEGISLATIVE STRATEGY FOR THE CLEAN AIR ACT AS ADOPTED BY THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERN-;ENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Federal Clean Air Act deadlines, without extension by Congress, will expire on August 31, 1988; and WHEREAS, the Federal Clean Air Act is essential to continued improvement to air quality in North Central Texas and the nation; i WHEREAS, there are currently numerous proposals in Congress i to amend as well as extend the Federal Clean Air Act; and i WHEREAS, each proposal would have a significant impact on the ability of the North Central Texas area to maintain and improve air quality while providing for meaningful economic development; and WHEREAS, the North Central Texas area has been and remains in nonattainment of the ozone standard thereby retaining the potential of federal funding sanctions; and WHEREAS, the Executive Board of the North Central Texas Council of Governments has formally adoppted a general legislative outline of principles which would, if incorporated into the Federal Clean Air Act, provide meaningful improvement to air quality and ongoing economic development; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton and the North Central Texas arot will be significantly affected by any change in the Federal Clean Air Act; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: I SECTION 1. That the Outline of Legislative Strategy for Cleans Xir Act, adopted by the Executivs Board of the North Central Texas Council of Governments on January 28, 1988, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby endorsed and adopted as a statement of legislative principles. SECTION 11. That the City Manager or his designee is hereby author ze ; Yn conjunction with other governmental entities, elected officials and other similarly interested organizations, to encourage the adoption by Congress of an extension and amend- tent to the Federal Clean Air Act which provides for meaningful improvements in air quality on national as well as regional levels without unduly penalizing economic development. 1 • Sr I I SECTION III. That this resolution and attached Legislative Strategy be transmitted to the City's state and federal representatives, the North Central Texas Council of Governments, and to other agencies and individuals as deemed appropriate by the City Manager. SECTION IV. That this resolution shall become effective imme ate y upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988. MY STEPHENSI MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: s; .F 4 YJ Y ~ f i 1 I n i j All F R 1 V North Central Texas Council of 6overnments i P 0 Drawer COO Arlington. Texas 76005-5888 , FROM: Marti VanRavenswaay DATE: May 9, 1988 r Chairman, NCTCDG Air Quality Advisory Committee t TO: Mayors, City Managers and County Judges in the Dallas-fort Worth { Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area SUBJECT: Request for Endorsement of the Outline of Legislative Strategy 1 for Clean Air Act Ii The U.S. Congress is developing new air quality legislation that will affect 1 North Central Texas. While the recently-developed ozone plan has resulted in a i deferral of the economic sanctions that had been proposed for the Dallas-Fort Worth area, it is very likely that new legislation will require further efforts by this region, as well as others around the country. NCTCOG's Air Quality Advisory Committee is a diverse group composed of local government elected officials, professional staff, and representatives from citizen and environmental groups and private irdustry. This committee developed the attached Outline of Legislative Strategy for Clean Air Act, which identifies major points that the committee unanimously agreed should be included in new clean air legislation. This Legislative Strategy was unanimously adopted by NCTCOG's Executive Board on January 28, 1988. It has been transmitted to Congress as a consensus position from this region. NCTCDG supports further efforts toward clean air, as clearly stated in the attached Regional Policy Position on Clean Air, which was used to develop the Legislative Strategy. It is important that such efforts be undertaken in ways that will not place undue economic stress on the region, or require intrusive changes in the lifestyles of its citizens. We are asking cities and counties in the nine-county Oallas-Fort Worth CMSA to formally endorse the Legislative Strategy, As we continue to attempt to influence the direction of legislation, it is important that the region speak i' from a unified position; the impact of this area's air quality position will be much greater if we can show that it is strongly supported by individual local governments. The Legislative Strategy has also been transmitted to the Texas Municipal League, which is seeking to develop a unified statewide position. Timing is important, since new legislation is moving quickly through Congressional subcommittees. Therefore, we are asking that you consider adoption of the Legislative Strategy in May. A sample resolution is enclosed, which may help you develop language for your own city or county, If you have adopted the Legislative Strategy, or would like more information, please 4 contact Jane Ojeda of NCTCOG's Environmental Resources Department, at iF 817/640.3300. Thank you for your consideration. I~ ar 4&11T~venswai CenterpointT.vo 616 Six Pigs Drive Detlas/ForlWorth Metro617/840.3300 ,r 't I I f 1 I Outline of Legislative Strategy for Clean Air Act Points to Include in the Federal Legislative Strategy National controls on motor vehicle emissions should be increased. • Controls should be extended to categories that are nov exempt • A fleet average total emissions standard should be set, allowing the manufacturer to choose the most technologically feasible and cost effective ways to reduce both idle and evaporative emissions. There should be national controls on motor vehicle fuels. • There should be national controls on Reid Vapor Pressure of gasoline. ; • The use of alternative fuels for centralized fleet operations should be encouraged, 4 National emission standards for commercial and private aircraft should be reviewed. ; } The ozone control strategy should be reviewed, • There should be federally-funded independent research by an agency such as the National Academy of Sciences to thoroughly understand how ozone is formed in the atmosphere. • A federally-funded continuous hydrocarbon monitoring network at least as extensive as the ozone monitoring network should be set up by state and local agencies within one year of bill enactment, • New legislation should be reviewed within five years and appropriately modified based on the research results. There should be deadlines for attainment. • It should be recognized that deadlines for attainment and requirements for continued progress toward attainment are necessary elements of clean air legislation, ! r • If an area cannot demonstrate attainment by 1992, and EPA specifies a required arl average percentage reduction of hydrocarbon emissions, all federal, state and local y # controls should be counted towards this reduction, SIP revision calls or requirements for revision of air quality control plans should not be l required more frequently than a 5-year cycle to allow time for evaluation of the progress of I previous plans. Sanctions should be Imposed only in areas which fail to adopt or Implement art EPA. approved plan. • Sanctions should be imposed only in those jurisdictions (within a planning area) that fail to implement required control measures for which they have implementation responsibility. A pro. d by the Executive hoard of the North Central Tows Council a Govemmer11% as reconnmended by the ekir Qu Aty Advisory Corrvnittee January 28, 19W a j r 3 3 1 The Nonh Canfral Texas Cowa of Gowmmwrts beftm that dm sk b a rwosaty Rn the ntahwwIce of pubk hoWh the *7Wm wt and tM soorow of Of ngto% As sudl NWCOG adopts ft- Regional Policy Position on Clean Air by the Executive Board of the ' North Central Texas Council of Governments j y 1 l 1 O"n sk standards curmWy bWng athlnad In Mo moon must continue to be &Wnod Of ft * %dw* reguided air pokAmi► owns is BN orOy one +rhk:h is a perahts i prublan in NoM Contnf liaaa No a 1- cea of nlfur dadde or nib*" dooeds haw ewr been momm W Me region, On a* ores occasion dtafng to het dosde hn ft carbon noaopdde atardatd bun aoudad in Doss Canfpt Psst oonYOl at d*giss kr had haw dranaMo * reduosd ertre b w QMt wen knrrsry ouAfrq eaaceedaicea of ft atatdard at On W Die and Cogn Cox&& 8hodw w4wwey - regndoq ft Sawn doW end other morAwft wa dahmdne d Die Canty Win owo ma wffh Me raw e1-du for very and pw td" (P*1% C aw ed M% to wid of m ere nso ~ euary to own the Chen at eWIdw cara a to be mat fw region Wtphma,te addllanf oonYolN tb htprvw ft -L-MM n MQ"V Canna AN reasonable efMfotts should be made Io MAM aft peak acme aplsodsss, Ck*W etudes haw hodctlsd tht *WaMd aeons Wmb may redt+ca the kxV% abaft' to move air W and out, mw haws Me MagtwW d aaf - spiso"and may mdL" the body's ablly to runt nsogmV W~orol The osjd Mrwi of tl» ana» atown YOft ft OW rfu date, WW 4011 ~y Ad++tnN we a+bNcfe of weed debals er * is OW lreKltwtIs of noem bo VW , - oas we moat be designed lo autn t pish ooior nowooew sbc hwW ekft dop per year w redroed or efI I wN as woodlouNy as ponift YoWle ftarflo compound smUsfM S MW be reduosd fie Mn "vokfU a4arro canpowe, or VOCE In a oafloh I kr a ergs Wray of oomootrde fxod+oed as a rm* of ewapordon or ofha proow enthaiona d dMrtioals, edvw ta, and pMnlaan products such as ge-ma - The EPA swaass m onora M bil 0 a nalt of q 000 of VOCh MA rti qW orddw wwd w conrnon dr ocnhnlrwW ft Womw d OxftK Then w ssotous tedr~lcal qua$"* on whWw redrdnq VOC'a wfa ar wr not achieve fM mae a aIdr+d f•ac*%*, many to* oompotxda Wald afao be redulwd as VON w further ooc*ul" a" noW*- benzene tdtw* ace a t xy%m erd phmof, TWA VW emfaelora ehotld be reduced, svun H thou atone wit not reduce peek cum epieodu, 1 r r t 1 V ' Elodod oMclals and ciftons must be kept lnkfMod Of oftfs to attda and malnWn cloon air. Since respons"Ity for oltdat hp and mWrh* hp sir quaky stwx%ft Is Ve Md piI iwly with stets end federal epenc+'a, affected offldelo and cfflw% may not be ft* awn of the sigNkeM prDWm made durhp the test two decades to reduce pWutw wn"ona For example, k is esM*od that VOCb free been reduced in pope and TarmM Cantles by neerty 60 percent between 1973 and 1987, reprosenthp 93,000 fewer tons per year of polut rft in the sir. purkrp he sane period, these two o nus added aknoet 800,000 new re7kWts, New controls oxrw* being kmplemenW a a ` I r"At of ttre 1985 redelom to the stab ozone plan am *stkr►ated to oat aknat $W I ; MOM errwely In tM two cantles. s i Cow , r Odq castor in +w /w 1r ~ • rM 1• IM j' IN r w"r r yy w WAN it Y r nrr r • ~w r w w • r ~ N Mr qr q• Ur ,A !r NA RM MWAM 03 ftwY M mow lbw OC MIYOM Conbvis at the source afr prataable to correct o salons; Moble souroee ere eswWtad b oocant for more than troll of the VOC emieeiorre in i the ro*m ptrnot omik 1a r3 reduce ft **W wdwb a hom aulomo" end ehlr+se r•thW w I lprled and mwvjbobind one; 1 who b lnA a meww" which ier d*N I llortl4 such M bane an dovi ft L, p&" and pas" Control Pops. nKpA rq at** oovw*s and ofw p*A m ,ontrd egNprnent on new core hu been We * acosssM In reductrq VW enroob rralbrMAds she e» 197011. Local LIM, we often not me oW4fisctlw ae rtslialol c ik and hequeMly orlcountar amoem+a Ths most oost+NaOW oonbols should be lmplan w tad Nett: TM Tom Mr Ca*d Owd Is wpaMiLM ibr we - off edwom In torM~ryw feaC"W of eliftft , at eel M "bletq the antblpatad Cab bn ocrrtrol meeouse. NCTCOd hoe kN%d reeporreblW for motile so=m h etude b room I* ft" controls WM Ore boost oat to sodety pw ton of emteebn reduction 00Ad be InVW toed before higher oal -W-tm ettern*Aa The ful rsrrge of oaM beyond doWs leach a Jobe) and benMta beyond & quatky (aM n mom tronek) OvAd be eoneidernd when dedsiww we made Ho cost-w-ton ft um "W &W owx when redu t* rftA from come o" of kispel wft* 4 i i i 1 t F ti Those who an part of the problem must be pelt of the soluWn. There aMsye seem to be quaetiorr on whWw a peak czorts prods in oft gsograpttlo area is cauaed prfrno* from tart arse, or Mvew the ozone is bsrnportad by sk aM M across OWdctlorri bow4wi a Shp owm or poNAln! MWOOrs twat be estabished h ai chin or neighborhoods, the EpA raq*u ttw computer modeb be used to ON** mgiortei cor0ftia TMe Made to caAs►ion and heated dleapreernenb among neighboring lurrdctlons on who ahoud htpiwttenl oonbcia where U*g 1M II bet inforr wdw araiabls at tM tires a dwWw must be made, rom who apps w to conbbuls 10 the problem must 0) p to cwWbuts to 1M sokidort. I I Mon Independent research !Mo the causes of peek *=me eplsodes E I is needed r Th" Is much &M w of opkian on the natsned mwntt of voC a rmia a to ` e peak 0=0 aprodn in tM of wpMra TM rshtlorrttip r bend an Mbordwy work that don not eppnr to be raid In 1M open &V. own Mwbe h ft mom hew not chartgWd in prowft to mductlorn in %AOC#s oAV tM Md IS year, This arts acertrb hn occurod In 00M even of 1M courtlry, yet EPYtb plrrtryr conboi *M@gy for ozone oontlaws to be breed on VOC oonircM ebna on" appsrs to be more affected by rttstsorobgbsl factors the arytHrtg sIM btdprWaM rnsarrh should bo hrtdsd to nsNsw avaiabls hlcnrtdbn rW oorXW mss rsesrch lo dalnmine how peak ozone lawn ors lorntad and cw bs oonboled in rr6wo ak M VOC Mwr we a* ft OMOWN VW otcr' be menursd and oortkmild dractly as an arnbrM In Pbw of i Improved nWhods an needed to mepure the smW perAormance Of controk i A k*W tu. bo of oww monibn w uud W meaMaa the charges In sir quepy Orr/ thousands cf aqurs Mai Wtft VOC emralorr an bs mortilorsd from " sdtlortry GMM the offw&wws of ocMrois on mobis aprons and amd ens awto is c da hW bwd cn prnorbed on%,*" iaosora Tian, the actual psrfamtsrtos d many control musurw le *J*d to deouwnt: even den a msawas is In pteea Li pnwd li mw tode we needed to trsok ate adusl sMa mwae of oonb Economlo "MOOm should net be Impose/ k ON controls In an 044PprtO W Sao Pfau hateo been know"W04 f TM Ctnn Ak Act aAirtss WWW soonorttio I- F, NO s rrhbh oould be Irttpoted by tM III EPA for fire of stab to Oft* in WM616osorn CC* pre. Ttna hcluds a ben on owsbucWn d m,W new hdlllh toXM and fw *Aoff of ladarai highway end watswstw irsabrod hnda M tM slat *Av to and EPA apporss a pin, and tM contror h tln pYn rs IIVW.wMed, but ajami assts Mwia do rust opus hfo l11 ca+K kr" wit' tM SW46 , soortortdo Milo, - shoW not be' posed N*iM* w t of a atndrd r not a Mir beer upon which b lwy area" and such ftnn that metltoea prows to be oapabb of W M V aMahmnx are ides ttAsd WAN bets the etas hn aubmlltad, OW EPA Ma apporsd clone piw% for D" rtd WMM Countln 0* dw ortsbsted AMa N-WO Cragh oomprtar mod$&W but whkdt did not acW* sash ow atarxtard MM 1M target data wu rssrdtad V NMOO Extaajdw Baud IUM Pow" Dtracbr Jot Mptwn em IAflwnd Oa R. bwim Cauncimrnbr. City of word Cary M91% Hodum CW* Ddu C *j* Viow Prwwidwnt DIrwClOr PNgfarrr COM %p e"Ptow Qom «rjw Cny of Gmm& WWAW TOA Cny of Lr cosity Swcnbrygwwrr Dt+vcyol Goom Cox" town G wxwm. Irob Hwmprt is" t: GMmmr Mwyw Pro Tim, ran wenh Cam Ai mlow %lug Caoony AM ny M taw, Ddu pom Pnwldrk okwbr EXSO W obscim !'awry ohm" Mitt VrnRww wM Wmbm 1 PNWC Carxtimnba, Clly 0 Arlrom V. DYrcbr dwhrt LrwrM Mqw Pro Anr, ay d Odo Ak Owft A*bM COmn►IIIN 1907 p QW&M Ploll mw mown 6nww1 CIO* Dda ro via" w Cfrtnbu of Can"srm. Cabpo of rao"irp WA HWO Comrriakw ay of " went, Cilhrn ay Of h" O / of Mdodwon ay of Do bn Iran ML lum rd Palo O L Mm OOt ITS~gY+ww Go" Dynwks d HHoM Dept., a rro, y f mW. ay of a.bwo Joe Web a mw D" 9bont pub Rawftwrd Hy AnV t Cly Wwr, C y d Fw* Hw Waft Cy d Pon wom wits Admix Ad^ Comm Cowry taaewa are" CNY co ArRavw ?AM U Moo MocW Ddow Cw y T}~ ~ Camim w, Duft Co,A* J" Wr " Obobr of &N omwo H*WM Oda CfMmbw of Cawv*oo ay of &NW ftk* l Ads"W by ' ft N" CwnW Tme Co MM a Woo mew, Dori w &wd AvrjW FN NaM Crwwf 7bm C coW of Gommm* it a vmUdwy mooWm of ft d *4 oar" &W voew aM16icM 0-1190 184orrNy No+Oh Cwnbaf Moran Atyklrr fir n►on MgbnrMMOrb all MOAN C&*w row Councl of Caavffowft Dwp&OmN of &Nkm, w, PN mes - AD OmNw C061616 S& fba D t alkfttorr, ibx w 78008.88881(817) 810-3900 (mMbo). i i 4 i t ~r f INN i i 3 s k `rm f ~ E 4 t k i I! di 114 i 1 1 if 1 l~ c M~ 1 r DATE: 6-7-88 f , $ CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT; Resol:tion authorizing for a Rental the City Manager to submit an Rehabilitation Giant. application to H, RECOMMENDATION; I1.D, Staff recommends approval 4 f S' MMAR Y : r r for 1988 1s The City of Denton's formula rental rehabilitation $73,000. In the past, we have ~al2ocation from H. V.D. ' State for increased fundin been able to refuse these funds and a d1 V~~~ B• This is no longer allowed, Cities receiving formula allocati t° the pp2y S ons from EPARTMENTS OR eGkUUPSeAFFE~TNDunding. Denton may not request State funds CDBG Staff will administer the program, in 1988. FISCAL IMPACT: New legislation allows up to 10% of a Rental Rehabilitation Grant to be e administration of the program. This will $7,300.00 increase the CDBG administration ibudget fby ~ e 3 ResR ~o~' C U ub x tedt 4 My City Managerre Prepared by; i i Bar ara oss Community Development Coordinator APP o ed: Frank Robbins ( Executive Director for Planning and Development r I f ' ♦7 f~ ^0 T M• N I ! 1645L l I RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOR A GRANT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, , WHEREAS, the City of Denton is eligible to receive suLh funds and desires to apply for federal funds administered by :he Depart. rent of Housing and Urban Development; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton, as an entitlement City, has pre- pared a program for utilizing funds for rehablV. ation of privately owned rental property to be used primarily for residential rental purposes in the amount of approximately $739000; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton desires these funds to support the f rehabilitation of privately owned rental property; NOW k- THEREFORfi, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas author zes a City Manager to sign and submit to the Department of Housing and Urban Development a grant application and appropriate assurances for entitlement funds under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. SECTION II. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas matters related ito Mthegapplicatione and theaassurances irequired ~I therefore, forxSECTION III. That the City Secretary is hereby directed to car led copy of this Res+lutton to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1488, u ATTEST: JENNI 1 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM; DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY j BY., t P R 1 t r3 p f I i ' Lill= LLI= LLF= I I i t I~ 1 it I l DATE.- 6-07-88 a CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 10: Mayor and Members of the City Council ` FROMt Lloyd Y. Harrell, City Manager f a SUBJECT: Resolution c.eating a Low/Moderate Income Housing Task Force, appointing members to the Task Force and providing for an effective date. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending approval of the resolution. A Low/Mod- erate Housing Task Force will assess needs and present recommen- dations to City Council concerning housing within the City. s i SUMMARY: The issue of affordable housing, primarily for low•ircome families/ ;individuals has recently surfaced as an area in need of study. There is evidence that the City's current housing programs fail to provide " assist'rice in man yeas. It is suggestedd that a study ay elicit iolu ions programs, and/or resources wiich may be t' s v po sibb11e PROGRAMS, DEPAR M TS Oi GBUI~PS. FEE_TED:utilized by the City to meet this growing need. 4 ii The Planning staff will provide direct support to the Task Force. Input from other departments will be requested as needed. FISCAL ibSPACT. ~ l Planning/CDBO budgets will provide necessary funds. Respe ulIy ub I tedt j~ oy arre City Manager Px ared by: X11 er era oss Community Development Coordinator App ved: Fran H. Robbins 5 i Executive Director for Planning and Development =1 I 1 I 2357L RESOLUTION NO. n A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON CREATING } A LOW/MODERATE INCOME HOUSING TASK FORCE TO FORMULATE AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEM OF OBTAINING AFFORDABLE AND ADEQUATE HOUSING BY INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES WITH LOW TO MODERATE INCOME; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton desires creating a Low/Moderate Income Task Force to address the concerns of affordable and adequate housing; and WHEREAS, it shall be the responsibility of the Task Force to identify problem areas of housing for low/moderate income ' individuals and families; and WHEREAS, it shall further be the responsibility of the Task Force to help formulate solutions and make recommendations to the City Council regarding how the City can effectively encourage the development of low/moderate income rental and owner-occupied housing as well as the maintenance of existing low/moderate income housing in a safe and habitable manner; and WHEREAS, it shall further be the responsibility of the Task Force to investigate and make recommendations to the City Council on what funding, resources and programs are available to i help implement the Task Force's recommendations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION Is That the "Low/Moderate Income Task Force" shall bu appointed resolution of the City Council and whose member- siip shall be comprised of the following people: Deborah Darley~ Chairperson Mariella Cornish ' Ieabell Miller Phil Shea Lucy Campbell Reginald Logan Harry Down Paul Ephraim Norma McCarthy SECTION It. That it shall be the charge of the Task Force to; i N I (a) ident" Y and define the problems and needs that low/ I~ moderate income individuals and families encounter in finding affordable and adequate housing; (b) formulate and Council on how thevCity canomeffegtively eto the ncourage City and provide for the development of low/moderate income rental and owner-occupied housing and for the main- tenance of existing low/moderate income housing in a safe and habitable manner; (c) investigate and make recommendations to the City Council on what funding, resources and programs are available to help implement the Task Force's recommendations. SECTION III. That this resolution shall become effective imme a3i~e pea its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1988, i ATTEST: JENNI APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAHI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY . f BY: I r ~I r, 'r f b` aY V G i l I1 1 I ~ I I 1~ 1 ~ ' I i rr i 2361L [J i RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION CREATING THE BLUE RIBBON CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR SOLID WASTE TO FORMULATE AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL RELATIVE TO THE PROVISION OF SOLID WASTE SERVICES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. SECTION I. There is hereby created and established the Blue Ribbon t zees Committee for Solid Waste, which shall be composed of the following persons: George Gilkeson, Chairman Ralph Morrison Ivan Glasscock Jim Stone Larry Luce Ray Stephens Todd Kerr Al Stenzel Matt Gohlke Richard Edyvean SECTION II. It shall be the charge of the Citizens Committee on Sof~~Aeste to: (a) Review and evaluate the role of the City of Denton relative to the provision of solid waste services, and submit an evaluation to the Council which shall include a recommendation of whether the City should continue to provide residential, commercial, and/or disposal services and whether changes in the level of service should be made. (b) Evaluate and provide a recommendation to the City Council relative to the future course of action to be taken in respect to the disposal of solid wastes, SECTION III. That this resolution shall become effective imme ate a y-upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1488. ~A R A'l"rEST: ER ER , C grCmAT APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTOPNEY BY: 4 i I I f C tj E jd 1 IkF w r f i I i i i ,E f { f I +l 1 4 i REQUEST FOR BLOCK PARTY E STREET CLOSURE Organization tequesting street c ' ` losurn; Address: Phone number;_ 3i p_41 v, Contact person: i i Data and time of street closure:l pC~ r { Place of closure ` i" tom. ~~'t e 4 Intersecting streets; .SSn, r~' Q Reason for closure; nr',• i Wee the neighbors of on o not o i 0r, act to a oc pa-T Name Address L % 2, WjP .Q lee l0._ i it ~'f~:'I~~lrl f l / I (t~~L•~C~C'l~ 27260 : 1 I a- A i 1-7 Pk~~~~jti 5. !/j+JI,' V , lJ Lto~rc~,•1, ~ (T r r~~ f j 1. S)s ~~io✓,,~` t ~ I It Ip r i I I F 1 ~ h I ~r 235AL I a RESOLUTION NO. s A FROM RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING INTERSTATE 35-E FRONTAGE ROAD, INTERSECTIO INTERSECTION s BONNIEIBRAE ON JULY 4 N1988;1ANDEPROVIDING AN T EFFECTIVE DATE. WITH M WHEREAS, Sidney D. Rogers, representing the Denton Kiwanis Club, is requesting that Interstate-358 frontage road, from its r intersection with Avenue E to its intersection with Bonnie Brae, a public street within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas be temporarily closed to public vehicular traffic botb,;aen the hours of 7:00 P.M. to 10:00 p.m. on July 4, 19880 for the purpose of having the Fifteenth Ann,-%I Children's Clinic Fireworks spectacular; and WHEREAS, Sidney D. Rogers, representing the Denton Kiwanis Club, has assured the City Council that the Texas Highway Depart- meet of the State of Texas has agreed to the temporary closing of the frontage road of interstate 35-E; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I. That Interstate 33-E frontage road, from its inter-' sect on w t Avenue E to its intersection with Bonnie Brae, a ppublic street in the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas be temporarily closed to vehicular traffic from the hours of 7:06 p.m. to 10:00 p.m, on July 4, 1988, for the purpose of having the fireworks spectacular. SECTIO:i II. That the City Manager shall direct the appropriate city-Tepai•tment work with the Texas Highway Department in erecting barricades on Interstate 35-E frontage road, from its intersection with Avenue E to its intersection with Bonnie Brae, at 7:00 p.m. and to have the same removed at 10:00 p.m. on said date. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 19880 M43'~PHCN~"1A41~`- ATTEST: i 3 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM., DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: r i 4 pY i F y X, I r I WHlN NM, (DUNI,, [pUN7 pN U1 • 1111 • ` first 1110s iall r 'priF1t 1.1a f 809 NORTH ELM • DENTON 7E XAS 78201 • 8171387-1233 R F To the Honorable Mayor and City Council Denton, Denton County, Texas G<.ntlemen: The Denton Kiwanis Club is currently engaged in planning for the Fifteentt, Annual Children's Clinic Fireworks Spectacular on July 4, 1988. We have enjoyed the cooperation of the Universi+.y of North Texas in this endeavor since the inception of this community effort. Representatives of the Kiwanis Club, UNT Athletica, VNT Police, City of Denton Fire Marshall Bob Rageman, and Western Enterprises, Inc., recently met to discuss all aspects of the fireworks show, particularly bifety of all con- cerned, This meeting resulted in the determination that a serious safety hazard will exist if normal traffic flow is allowed to continue on the I-35E frontage road during the fireworks show. The hazard occurs as a result of the placement of the firing site at a safe distance from Fouts Field, and the audience seated therein. It is our intention to clone the west parking lot and the adjacent soccer field to the public during the course of the show. We request that the City of Denton abstat us in our effort to close the frontage road for a period of three hors on the evening of July 4, 1988, for the purpose of safety for all concerned. (7:00- 10:00 p.m.) We ucderstand that the ultimate responsibility for the frontage road rests with the State of Texas, and we have contacted Mr. Dwight Bird, local resident engineer with the Texas Highway Department. Mr. Bird requested that we ask the city council to write a letter concurring with our request for this closure. Your prompt consideration of this matter :1111 be greatly appreciated by the Denton Kiwanis Club, and all the recipients of the medical and dental care provided by the Children's Clinic in this effort. Sin erely you s,' Sily D: Ror Chairman 1988 fCiwanis Children's Clinic Fireworks Spectacular } .r r A r I~ 1 LJL-ILI f 4 f 1 I 7} I ! 1 i V j 1 I a E CITY Of RENTON, rBXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING/ DENTON. TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE (8:7) 688.8307 Office of the CffY Mt,nttWf M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jennifer Walters, City Secretary ,r DATE: June 3, 1988 SUBJECT: Back-up for Agenda Item t 6•A• No formal back-up materials were submitted for this item. i i EE I i i j i J fifer alters { I'I 2721C/2 n , S 1 f V Hal j! I' 4 1 t t : 1 r I i ~ ' f t i 1 i I I I i J r i V f DATE: 6-7-88 { CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT , TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager f SUBJECT: Approval of a resolution authorizing the City Mapager to sign and submit to the Deparment of Housing and Urban Development a 1988 Final Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. RECOMMENDATION: The CDBG Committee recommends approval. Their approval is contingent on review of the programs by the Human Resources Committee. LULAC will be expected to submit detailed descriptions of each program within 90 days of this resolution. The HRC will review SUM the p flans and make recommendations. I~ Three public hearings were held to gain citizen input/suggestions on the use of CDBG funds. Proposals from citizens and City staff were reviewed by the CDBG Committee before recommendations were made. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: CDBG staff will work with LULAC, the Denton Housing Authority, and the Parks and Recreation Department to implement programs. ; , FISCAL IMPACT: Programs will be administered with CDBG administrative funds. C I Respe uIly sub i ted$ T oy arre City Manager I Pfa~pared by; at ara ss Community Development Coordinator ! rank o'+bin xecutive director for Planning and Development j I i i 4 f i . . J I~ ;1 i ' i i i y Z i r i f t i i I I i. ,a I r i i t i I 2318L RESOLUTION NO. 4 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORISING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT A FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS WITH APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATIONS, AS AUTHORIZED AND REQUIRED BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 19741 AS AMENDED; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, is concerned with the development of viable urban, communities, including decent housing, a suitable livinit environment and expanded economic opportunities; and ' WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, has a special concern for persons of low and moderate income; and WHEREAS, the City of Denton, Texas, as an entitlement City, has prepared, through a citizen participation process, a program for utilizingg its fifth year entitlement funds in the approximate amount of $553,966; and WHEREAS, the public hearing will have been held in accordance with the law; and WHEREAS, the Act requires an application and appropriate j certification; NOW, THEREFORE, 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: { SECTION I. That the City Council of the City of Denton, i Texas, aut or zes the City Manager to sign and submit to the i Department of Housing and Urban Development a grant application and appropriate assurances for entitlement funds under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. SECTION II. That the City Council of the City ref Denton, Texas, autHo`rizes the Director of Planning and Community Development to handle all fis.al and administrative matters related to the application, the Housing Assistance Plan and the assurances. SECTION III. That the City Secretary is hereby authorized to furnish cop es of this resolution to all interested parties. ~I i 4 J I i • I i SECTION IV. That this resolution shall take effect immedi- ately room aria after its passage. , ~r PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1988. I ATTEST: t JENNIFER , CITY SMUM APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY i BY: I t I I i h i ,l r y FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEL0,6214T OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS The objective of the City of Denton'a Community Development Block Grant Program is to support activities which are directed toward the specific objective of development of viable urban communities by providf:,g !!cent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunity, principally for persons of low and moderate income. The city anticipates receiving approximately $553,966 for its 1988 program year. Proposed activities and objectives are as follows. 1. Housing Rehabilitation $369,804.00 Continuation of the existing program to rehabilitate substandard houses inhabited by low or moderate income persona living in the city. Objectives To bring existing housing into compliance with housing code and arrest deteriorating neighborhoods in the target a reg. 2. Demolition and Lot Clearance $150000.00 I Continuation of tki 1984/1985 program to substandard structures that contribute to theldeterioration ~ofaneighbor- hoods. Demolition activities will take place within the targeted area, r E Objective: To arrest deterioration of targeted neighborhoods and eliminate major health hazards in the target area, 3. MLX Irrigation $8,000.00 Installation of an irrigation system for the new Martin Luther !ling, Jr. Community center located on Newton street b,tween Morse and Wilson Streets in the targeted area, Objective: To improve the quality of life and promote neighborhood stabilization in the targeted area, 4, MLX Landscaping $10,400.00 I' 7 Landscaping for the new Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Center, Project will include landscaping around the building and in the park, objectives To improve the quality of life and promote neighborhood stabilization in the targeted area. ~I ! 5. English as a Second Language $26,550,00 (808.44) classes An instructor will be hired to teach English to non-English speaking citizens. Classes will be taped and shown on cable in order to reach a greater number of citizens. I i+ Objectives Improvement of public services provided to low and moderate I income residents. d k N t Pinil Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected use of Funds Page 2 6. educational Assistance Program $21,212.00 Program will be set up to counsel low income students and their families concerning educational opportunities. Program personnel will seek out scholarships available to low income students and assist students in the application process. Objective: improvement of public services provided to low and moderate income residents. f 7. Phoenix Apartment Sidewalks $3,000600 Construction of sidewalks at the Phoenix Apartments from Building 30e south along Riddell to Wilson Street in the targeted area. 1 Objective: To improve the quality of life and promote stabilization in the targeted area. f ~ S. Administration $1000000.00 Program management, coordination, monitoring and evaluation associated with carrying out eligible grant activities. , f i f f n I~ t ,i f 05/7e i Ii j 1 i f N 1 / rncJ ft6;d0 /X/ CITY of DtNTON. TlXAa 215E. WK1NNEYI DENTON, TEXAS 752011 TELEPHONE (817) 5W200 NlEPORANDUNI DATE: June 7, 1988 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ri FROI Bill Claiborne, Chairman, and Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN E The Planning and Zoning Commission's recommended Capital Improvement Plan, 1988-89 thru 1992-93, is attached for your consideration. As you may know, suggested projects and needs were identified by the public, community institutions and busi- f t` nesses, advisory boards and commissions, and staff members ! each having a close perspective of the specific issues. Un- fortunately, the suggested projects and needs far outnumber projected, available funds. Public input, the adopted rating systems, staff analysis and recommendations, cost-benefit appropriateness, and the like- lihood of voter acceptance were key factors considered by the ' Commission while making its recommendation. In our opinion the suggested projects in each of the program years are consistent with helping the City of Denton achieve its stated objectives, " and to increase its responsiveness to those it serves. fA The recommended funding level for 1992-93 non-utility projects is $6,623,000 In comparison to $6,514,306 for the previous year. r.. ! he are aware that non-utility projects in program years up to 1991 have been approved by the voters and that a bond election a will be required for subsequent years. Based on financial ^i projections, the recommended non-utility projects for the latter two program years can be supported at current tax-rate levels. Mayor and MerLbers of the City Council June 7, 1958 Page 2 There are no recommended changes in the first three progran years for non-utility projects. Staff recommended and the Commission supports an amendment to the 1991-92 program year pertaining to airport improvements and drainage improvements. The applicable funding levels have not changed. We concur with staff that the Municipal Airpcrt would be better served with the proposed changes. Also, the recent neighborhood meetings brought to light some much needed further improvements to Pecan Creek, thus necessitating , reallocation of funds for drainage projects. The projects for the 1992-93 program year were selected according to the previously stated criteria. A specific project area which continues to be identified as a ' critical need by the Commission is development of or improve- i ments to community swimming facilities. We are aware that a timing and revenue questions will not allow the City to take advantage of on attractive opportunity to jointly fund a swim- ming facility with the Denton Independent School District in conjunction with construction of the Eilly Ryan High School. However, we feel that asking the school district to delay construction of a pool, reserving space for additional pool development or some similar mechanism are still options worth exploring. We have also been convinced of the need to make improvements to the Civic Center Pool. Our recommendation is to designate funds in the Capital Improvement Plan for the year 1992-93 for swimming facilities. As details and specific plans take shape and further study is completed, we will be bringing you suggested alternatives/recommendations. " In the utility area, we applaud the usual fine work done by the Public Utilities board and the administrative staff. We commend the joint efforts of the Planning and Utility staff for devising a priority ranking system, applicable to the utility area. This rating system can be used to recommend and identify the most worthwntle utility CIP projects as well as support policies proposed in the Dr.ft Denton Development Plan, if adopted. j We will continue to review the quality and validity of our Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as our community evolves and changes. on behalf of the Commission, thank you for the I opportunity to serve. Respectfully submitted, Mr-Ma o r n e wp 0762o k; k~ t I,r~n t ~ RECOMMENDED NON-UTILITY i CIP AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION I 1JIY rf I' R t f! • ~ I \ E 3.1 7 ~l 1I 1# a CITY OF DENTUN FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (NON-UTILITY) 1988-89 PROJECT ESTIMATED COST HOW FUNDED Streets and Transportation Teasley Lane (FM 2181); Four lane 250,000 1986 Bond issue divided I-35 to 2 miles south) Davis Street Paving Improvements 50,000 1986 Bond Issue Avenue E Improvements 400000 1986 Bond Issue (Eagle Drive to I-35) x Bonnie Brae Rebuild 301,557 1995 Street Improvement Bond (4 lanes Windsor to University drive) Bonnie Brae Rebuild 899,984 1985 Street Improvement Bond (4 lanes University Drive a to Scripture) Audra Lane Rebuild 61,244 1985 Street improvement Bond { (End of divide to Paisley) J Acme Street Rebuild 61,302 1985 Street Improvement Pond (Bernard to Fort Worth Drive) Locust Street Rebuild 682,095 1985 Street Improvement Bond (Congress to University) Drainage Update Master Drainage Plan $ 425,000 1986 Bond Issue Parka and Recreation Recreation Center 41,300,000 1986 Bond Issue NUiletic Field Development 250,000 1986 Bond Issue Fire Stations and Eduianpt 2 New Fire Stations $1,0000000 1986 and 1981 Bond Issue Fire Equipment 2008000 1986 Bond Issue Library Ujansion, Phase 1 $ 460,000 1986 Bond Issue Plans for Law Enforcement Center/ $-2-0-0j OD0 1986 Bond Issue Cou,_t Copp ex TOTAL $6,181,1.82 1053k/2 1 CITY OF DENXN FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1 WN-UTILITY) # 1989-90 PRXECP ESTIMATED COST HOW FUNDED Streets and Transportation Z Loop 288/Local participation $2,200,00 1986 Bond Issue (4 lane divided from U S 380 i to Colorado Blvd,) U.S 380/Local Participation 600,000 1986 Bond Issue six lane divided from U.S. 77 (Locust) to Loop 288) Nottingham Extension 500,000 1986 Bond Issue r (U.S, 380 to Mingo Road! U.S. 380 Right-of-Way Acquisition 250,000 1986 Bond Issue Bonnie Brae Rebuild 347,876 1985 Street Improvement Bond (Riney Road to Windsor) Scripture Rebuild (I-35 to Bonnie Brae) 347,907 1985 Street Improvement Bond W. Oak Rebuild 207,876 1485 Street Improvement Bo (1-35 to near Bonnie brae) nd Avenue A Rebuild 1101018 1985 Street I (Highland to McCormick) mprovement Bond Elm Street Rebuild 314,516 1985 street Improvement Bond i (Highland to Eagle) f Drainage r Loma Del Rey Drainage $ 625,000 1966 Bond Issue Stuart/Sunnydale Drainage 350,000 1586 Bond Issue Holly Hill Area Drainage Improvements 300,000 1986 Bond Issue i , r Law Enforcement Center $ 500. 6 Court OrPlext Phase I 000 1486 Bond Issue TOTK' $61753,203 r 1D53k/3 J I n'4 r' J i i r 3 i CI'T'Y OF DEMON i FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROMiENT PLAN (NON•JUTILITY ) 1990-91 a PROJECT ESTIMATED COST HOW FUMED Streets and Transportation Fort Worth Drive $1F065FO00 1°86 Bond Issue (U.S. 377) 4 lane divided from I-35 to FM 1830 Oriole Street Reconstruction 117,u00 1486 Bond Issue - Drainage Fort Worth Drive/James St, Drainage $ 90,000 1986 Bond Issue Parks and Recreation Recreation Center $1,400,000 1986 Bond Issue Athletic Field Development 450,000 1486 Bond Issue Library Expansion Completion $ 6000000 1986 Bond Issue Law Enforcement Center/ $1,900,000 1986 Bond Issue court complex c:onpletion TOTAL $5,622,000 i 1053k/4 •LY R: V RECOMMENDED CITY OF DENT014 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN E (NON-UTILITY) 1991-92 PROJECT ESTIMATED COST HOW FUNDED t Streets and Transportation ! j Pasch Branch Road/Phase I Future bond election required 380 to Jim Christal $ 573,125 for all projects proposed for { Masch Branch Road/Phase II 1991-92 program year f Jim Christal to FM 1515 10504,931 Local Participation/Four Lane I Divided Road - Spencer to I-35 10100,000 Intersection Control Signals 225,000 %illowwood Bike Path 1000000 Turn Lanes for Arterials 90,000 Pedestrian Signals _30,000 s CATEGORY TOTAL $3,623,056 Drainage i Cooper Creek Channel $ 75U4000 ! Kingfisher Drainage 75,000 Pecan Creek Drainage Bradshaw to Ruddell 250,000 CATEGORY TOTAL 10075,000 ! j Fire and Emergency Services E Second Aerial Device 500,000 Outdoor Emergency Sirens 253t750 j CATEGORY TOTAL 7530750 I i Airport Isprovementa j j f Road Access to South Hangar Area $100,000 Total coat of project/all Infield Drainage Improvement 70,918 ] locally funded Land Acquisition North 17/35 ] I 24.7 Acres 1070593 ) Land Acquisition 13.5 Acres 58,606 ] 101 local share of total Land Acquisition 31 Acres 135,U36 ) project cost/balance North Holding Apron 5 740 ] subject to FAA 901 match Runway Extension 110001 23r460 ] M.I.R.L. Runway Extension Lighting 1,400 J • Parallel Taxiway Extension Holding ] Apron 1,000' 15,800 ] Stud Taxiway to S.E. Industrial Area 60000 ] Commercial Service Area Paving 12,100 ] ! lr.B,O. Paving 710500 ] Executive Jet Center Aircraft Parking ib,070 ] Engineering and Contingency 236,077 ] CATEGORY TOTAL 762,500 I Library Bookmobile 250t000 PROGRAM YEAR TOTAL $6,514,306 I N y PLANNING 6 ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED E NCN-UTILITY CAPITAL IMFR(,VEMENT PROGRAM 1992-1593 PROJECT ESTIMATED COST BOW FUNDED Streets and Transportation Masch Branch Road, Phase III FM 1525 to Springside Road 830,000 Future bond election required Street Construction/Reconstruction 250,000 Westwood Paving for all projects proposed for 235 Intersection Control Signals ,000 1992-93 program year 235,000 Partial Improvements to City Sidewalk system 100,000 OVersired Participation in Thoroughfares 1000000 i Turn Lanes 95 too CATEGORY TOTAL 1,845,000 aralnaae Cooper Creek Drainage, Phase iI $10 000,000 Alexander Street Area Drainage 123 000 Oak Street and Avenue E Drainage 100000 CATEGORY TOTAL 1,228,000 Parks and Recreation ]]]f Civic Center Pool Expansion/ fA Renovation* 1,000,000 City/DISD Joint Swimming Facility at Billy Ryan h.S,• 5000000 Land Acquisition for Community Park 5000000 Neighborhood Park Development 300,000 " CATEGORY TOTAL 2,300,000 I Pita De 49kMent and EnsraanCy SerVlClB Rehabilitate Station M1 $ SOO,000 (NeXinney Street) Rebuild Station t4 (Kings Row) 750 000 CATEGORY TOTAL 10250,000 PROGW YEAR TOTAL 60623,000 • Pool protects listed based on present conditions and information - Continuing 1 negotiations With school district. and future plan.ting will provide basis for final recommendations and decisions regarding best way to allocate $1.5 million to meet community swimming needs. 40Q9M/tu E J ti a i C i i .A T i. I C!r f r 4 i i~ I t 'r STREETS, TRANSPORTATION AND DRAINAGE b ' j 1992 - 93 AND ONE DRAINAGE MODIFICATION IN 1991 - 92 1 `z w p 11 r,l 1 a r v d. li y yi~ yy r 4° t rw I`r f 1 i S CITY OI VENTON, TEXAS 213 E, MCKINNEYI DENTON, TEXAS 76201 /TELEPHONE (817) 568.88200 s i t MEMORANDUM 1 1 DATE: April 7, 1988 ii TO1 David Elllson, Assistant to the City Manager { FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer f 'r SUBJECT: CIP requests for 1991-93 x The following are requested projects originated during the C.I,P, public hearing on March 30, 1988. The projects listed are the Public Works Department's responsibility. All estimates include inflation adjustments of 51 compounded yearly. Each has been addressed either by cost estimate or an explanation. It should be noted that the cost estimates for projects 16 through 20 and 2 are very rough due to the large I scope of the projects and our uncertainty of the exact details. When the exact scope is available a detailed cost estimate should be completed. 11 Airport Road West -_$560,000: A cost estimate was figured by two local contractors based on a 37' b/b street section and basic drainage design. This would provide for one half of the ultimate six lane facility from US 380 to Jim Christal Road. The project would greatly enhance access to the airport major intensity mode, The estimate was multiplied by $1 per year compounded inflation rate and 171 for Engineering and contingencies. 2, South Loop 288 (I35-E to 135-h) - $2S,000,000: Our ability to estimate a project of this size is limited for several reasons. First, the length of 64,000 feet includes S possible bridges and/or grade separations that we have roughly estimated at $5,000,000. A four lane urban section was figured in our very rough cost. Costs for drainage could be very intensive as the main branch o of Hickory Creek will be crossed. Existing right of way is very limited so costs are very difficult to estimate at this time, our estimate is very rough. The actual cost figure should be obtained from the State Department of Highway and Public Transportation, District 18 in Dallas. CIP 1992-93 page 2 Traffic Count at Bonnie Brae and Windsor: The official count on Windsor Drive at Bonnie Brae is 1547 vehicles per day, We have no counts on Bonnie Brae, The residents in the area estimated 10,000 vehicles per day f through the intersection, This intersection will be improved in conjunction with tha Bonnie Brae Paving and Drainage Improvements currently scheduled for construction in 19 H-90. s 4. Reconstruct Bonnie Brae (South of 135) - 4,000' to ' - --owwoo = This section of Bonnie Brae was estimated as a 45' b/b four lane undivided section. Major drainage costs are Included as the channel carrying the water from the southwest part of the NISU campus runs along Bonnie Brae for 1600 feet and then crosses under in a major box rx culvert to the west. The rest of the channel to the railroad culvert would be completed by developers. 5. Drainage Oak Street and Avenue G; i Some of the drainage problems In the area will be alleviated when Oak street is reconstructed beginning in October of IM. It will take an additional $100 000 to l build an adequate downstream drainage system between Hickory street and Prairie street. The existing system was installed in the 1960's - early 1970's and was not designed for ultimate development of the area which is now complete, This area contains a significant amount of Impermiable area due to the high concentration of apartments, 6. Sidewalks Throughou• Dton; en Sidewalks cost approximately a:3 per linear foot for a 4 foot wide concrete section, and 17 p l S' wide concrete section. Sidewalks are needed throughout Denton to provide access to parks, shopping areas, schools, and for neighborhood leisure activities, 7, Street Maintenance in the Downtown Area; There is already money set aside for additional repaving in the downtown area in the 196S street bond fund, All the access roads including Cedar, Austin, Walnut, and Pecan are scheduled for repaving as soon as the underground utility situation is finalized so the new work will riot be effected by immediate street cuts. .r i J I M CIP 1992.93 page 3 S. Repair or replace sidewalks Downtown: Due to the large width of the sidewalks downtown, it would cost approximately $40 per linear foot to rebuild them. An approximate 10' width was used. Excavation of the existing materials would cost about $10 per lineal foot maximum. The elevation of the north end of the Square is one reason for high cost estimates. 9. Parking Garage Downtown - $2 - $5 Million: j The scope of this project is undeterminate so a very rough estimate was provided. NTSU has recently completed a project of this scale so they could be consulted. Another alternative is to buy buildings and lots very close to the Square and redesign for parking lots but this alternative j has very negative impacts historically and space wise. 10. Bernard Street (Eagle to hickory) - $1,000,000: The need for this thoroughfare would be generated by North Texas State if the existing thoroughfare concept using Welch is modified. This road would provide a back access to the parking lots currently being accessed off Welch street. Hickory would be changed at its intersection of Bernard if this scenario is followed. The City of Denton has Carroll Boulevard only a few hundred feet to the east as an existing 6 lane thoroughfare so the- project is for NTSU access. 11. Traffic Study NTSU area: A traffic study that considers the Master Plan for NTSU is necessary for Denton to address the infrastructure needs in the area. The study would also evaluate existing capacities and traffic patterns. The Engineering/Traffic Divisions can do a basic analysis of this area or a consultant could be hired for $10,000 to $20,000 to provide a more detailed and unbiased analysis. 12. Traffic Signal at Loop 255 and_Kings Row - $100,000: The cost estimate is based on conversations with local traffic engineering consultants for signal construction on a freeway. Lengths across lanes and bores are the major costs. This signal does not meet warrants at this time but is being monitored by the State Highway's Traffic office in Dallas. 13. Traffic Signal on E. McKinney Street at new High School - s E The need for the signal would be generated by DISD as the school is built. Pa,t of the platting requirement for the .1 n f t CIP 1992-93 page 4 new high school included funding of this signal since no signal the would at able to time. It 1992 fort' unlikely need school exists be built. 14. Drainage System at Strickland Jr .High School - $752000: This is an old request and has been estimated and evaluated in previous years. It is needed but flooding com laints g rounds. Nhoa infgastructurenwasYeinstlalled whendthenscphool y was built. 15. Robinson Road (2161 to Corinth City Limits} - ~2,000~000: This area has some existing- development such as the Lakewood Estates mobile home park. everal tracts that f had perimeter street paving requirements have been lop platted and not constructed. A great would also have streets provided. Our cost estimate was lane divided arterial section with a median for a four treatment. This would match the road already completed in Corinth by Oakmont. 16. State School Road (I35 to Corinth City Limits) $1 200, GOO: This estimate was roughly created using a percentage of the South Loop 286 cost estimate which utilized a four lane urban section. Since it would be a part of that facility it should be constructed to those standards. 17. Widen kings Row (Nottin hg am to Loop 266) - X1,400,000: road Our rouh cost estimate was based on removing the existing construction. A new four lane divided arterial section would be built between the limits shown. Developers have the current responsibility for the uncompleted portion of this road. 16. Hickory Creek Road (FM 2161 to FM 1830) - X5,500,000: This estimate was also roughly completed using a P Loop 26E roject of which it is a percentage of the South major component. Developers or t e State would currently bear the cost of these improvements. 19. Ryan Road (FM 2161 to FM 1630)41200,000: Ryan Road was roughly estimated using average costs from Robinson Road. This area has the capability to be an developments constructed median area as treatment they o used . section e with in the four lane urb for estimating. h' M CIP I992.93 page S 20. Connection between Eagle Drive and Morse Street - Several issues are relevant to this project. First if a f bridge,is taken over Bell Avenue and the railroad tracks, V Locust would have to be closed. A study on this issue was completed In the mid 1970's. If a tunnel was utilized, the costs could exceed $2,000,000 for that structure and f ! associated connections to bell, locust, and Elm. The ` portion of Morse between Bell and Woodrow would need very f special alignment analysis ao the street right of way would fit through the neighborhood. Finally, the section between Woodrow and Loop 288 would be constructed by developers as the two major developments currently planned there occur. 21. Highland Park Road Drainage - $1111000: This small system would provide inlets along Highland Park road and an outfall system to the NTSU golf course between Highland Park Circle and Whippoorwill, 22. Alexander Street Drainage -1128,000: This project is located off Wilson street just south of Fred Moore Park. The subdivisions In the area were bullt without drainage infra structure. The recent construction - of the Morse Street Baptist church has aggravated the situation. This project needs im-nediate solution but funding is difficult or a project of this size except in the CIP. Again, please consider the fact that Items 2, 16, 17, 18, 199 20 were estimated using very rough scopes and having limited knowledge on the design standards since the projects would be State highways or involve major bridge structures that we do not have in house estimating capabilities for. Some of the later projects also Involve a philosophy of the City providing up front some major infra structure to encourage dev,ilopment, If you have any questiohs, please let me know. Sincerely, Jerry Clark City Fngineer OSSOE i a" CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 566.8200 I { - i May 13, 1588 TO: David Ellison, Assistant to the City Manager FROM: Jerry Clark, City Engineer F SUBJECT; Pecan Creek Drainage ✓ The recent neighbotnooa meeting at the Lakey Street Legion Nall revealed some details on the flooding occurring along Pecan Creek, especially in the area between Wilson and Prairie streets. Site inspection shows that the channel needs to be improved with a concrete bottom from Bradshaw to the recent \J construction completed through the Phoenix Apartment complex, I In the 1991-92 Capital Improvements Budget, one million dollars was dedicated for use on Cooper Creek. We have recommended another one million for this year 1992 Due to th,; severity of the problem on Pecan Creek which involves severe erosion and { inability to properly malntaln the bottom and side slopes we recommend that $250 000 be shifted from Cooper Creek to Pecan I Creek to the 1991-91 already approved Capital Improvements Budget. This modification would spread funds throughout the City more efficiently and fairly while solving a problem that has already disrupted many citizens along Pecan Creek between kuodell and Bradshaw streets, i 0559E i i I I ! E 1AOiC1 TITLE Aalp "UM MM i Masch Branch Road Phase III Cost; #830,000 ~EM~OMibl[ 0[ T11[IIT Alb OIYINOM Public Works/Engineering PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP Masch Branch Road has been targeted by the Land Use Committee in their recent Development Guide + Update as critical to opening up the Denton Airport area for development as a major `l employment center. The project will ultimately i run from Highway 380 to 135 W. The first two sections which were chosen for the 1991-92 fiscal year will immediately relieve F.M. 1515 from peak hour congestion that results from the existing factories and plants in the rn area. { 'ihe third phase will be constructed between F.M. I 1515 and Springside Road. h I u F I 4 r DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RAT146 FORM 'I T r BUOBET YEAR 1917.92 I Aemunttne Oaarta~ett l~.r~.c-~_ L~~ctt:~ ' I Proleet MIA: ,1nOScC^ ITEM I CRITERIA I VOA[ ( 1EI4rt ( TOTAII 1. WED (OTHER TMAN 2-41 1 2 Serious, immedate Identified need i I 1 I I I Moderate Identified need 1 S I 0 La or unidentified need 1.6 1 2, PUBLIC HEALTH Olt SAFETY I I I I I 2 Adhteses t major halth or safety Word 1 Addressee s minor health or safety hasard ! B t, ' l 0 All other mrejects 3. U44LY AEQU1At0 + 11---- I Repaired to met legal "letioms i f I 1 Will not anticipated legal requirements I 0 All other orelmets 3.s i a. COMPLETES A PAOJ[CT I I I I I 3 Rpelred to ate usable a major Public Improvement I I weeded to complete an already useable public improvaeeat i j 3.5 ` I 1 Adds to, completes enhances a completed program 110. I r I 0 All other erofec.-. _ I I I I S. ADDRESSES NEED =v~ r y., ~y _ I• I 1 2 Project highly effective and afficreet 1 i 1 Project moderately effective and offfcla+N r, a= f i 0 Project for offect(veness and efficiency 1 6. RELATIONSHIP TO PLANS/POLICIES I ! I * I 1 2 Clearly advances plans and Policies I { I I (r~ 1 Doesn't conflict with plans and pal Was 1 Z J 5.5 1 f 1 r ' 0 Conflicts with plans and ootieies I i (w.~. NEIGHBORHOOD W1µ1 I I ! { I 2 Overall positive effects ! 1 Little or no effect 1 I I J I 0 overall no"trve effects 5 I + S. GENERAL BUDGET IMPACT 1 I I I 2 Returns investment or more than investment 1 1.5 Reduces or avoids subsequent costs I I I 1.0 Little or no not impact on Wblequent costs (under $10,000 par yr.) 1 2 1 T.5 .S Moderate net impact (under 160.000 par yr.) I I I et (under 160 000 oar yr) l 0MOTORV MfahEH[Cl[ net isoaUTILIZATION 9. r I I t 1 I I I I 2 Aesulte In economies of city 's afar raAlete use 1 ~ I + I 1 No Impact I 1 1 I,, _ 0 Ineroasea eases a C1 v'I eater vehicle use _ I I I I 10, t0(NC1Otf NITN MASTER PIAM I 2 coincides I 1 No impact j 2 j i s j j L- 0 _ Confl lets I 11. QUAIm oP INFORMATION i 2 Complete and accurate I 1 I I I 1 Incomplete i Z- i 3 i ~o I 0 Y_ory 1rttU, Door I T01AL SCORE I I I r{7, S ( PANK (w(thln Department) _ ( I I i J N t r` , f PNOW TITLE AIO MAIKO teraection Control Signals - 3 each Coat; 235,000 ptllONlMLE K a1E Am Egos" Vuhlir n rin PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP At least three more signals will be needed by ,T . 1992-1993, Several signals were funded in the I 1986 CIP election, and three more intersection r _ control signals were chosen in the 1991-92 CIP. In order to keep up with increased traffic volumes and new construction in Denton, we feel that three more of the following intersections U should be signalized. 1. Kings Row at Loop 280 2. Avenue D at I-35 • t 3. Sherman Drive at Loop 288 S4erman Drive at Kings Row 5. Lillian Miller at Southridge ' 6• Teasley Lane at Lillian Miller L _ J 7, Mockingbird at McKinney N 8. Avenue D at Eagle 9. Oak and Hickory at Bonnie Brae j 10. Stuart Road at Loop 288 ?i low i - } i V DENTON COUAL IMPROVEMENT PAWICT II FOAM IHOUT YEAR 110-12 1, T!, 77 7 K - - - - - - - - - - - - - - sl-ci i 1TEN I 1, NEED (OTHER rWN Ri - CRITERIA SCORE i NtrCNT i TO rAlJ i 2 serious, immediate Iduttffad need i J I MNeraw identifies nib - J [i J T.S r is i Pulllt HEUId 011 SAFETY i 2 Addreseda a major bealtb or safety hasps 1 i ! J J I 0 11 Addressed a ofW health or safety huard i Z i 1 i I J. UGA RE Kir i J L I i t Requirod to meet lepl ro"latlons J J I I G Ill not anNCipated 1"41 requirements + I 1,1 I J ILI_ I J e. CWLETES A PM14 j r I R ROW P" U m1Re 105411 a major public fprov emt I i 11 i I NOSM to Compleq mn already useable public improvement 1 Adds to, copleta, e0ancu a completed program I 1.5 J ' s Al i o. J i s. AoDassEs NEED i I ! Project highly effective and •f►fcient J i project moderately effective and africient I I i I 2 J AEU0 yr l4TIOMSMI►ow Ntec veness One erfrelenc I S / I I J 6, r0 PLANS/POLICIES I ! I 2 Clearly advances plans and palfNes I ! J f ,I I Doesn't conflict with plans One paIlcles i 2- I 0 C rtrH Ls with lens One oollc(rs D.S i I I`y'r NEIGMIORH000 IMPACT I I 2 Overall positfve effects f 1 little or no effect J ! I I rail n tlve effects 1 Z I S ! t om I i 6. GENERAL IVOGtt IMPACT J 2 Returns investment or more than investment I I ' I 1,5 Roducea or avoids subsequent costs ( ! 1,0 little or no not Impact on subsequent costs (under 110,000 per yr,) ! i .s Moderate net impact (under :10.000 per yr.) I I T,S I t S L-`„0 Hteh Mt t c n is 0 I + i MOTOR VEHICLE UTILUAT per yr 1 f i i 2 Results in sconomlea of City's motor vehicle use J I J I No impact J I i 1 0 lnenee.. e. • • "ty'e amtor reAleit use I I 1 1 Z J i0. CotNCIO[S III MA511(R amble IM, i 2 Coincides I J i I No impact 1 I 1 1 2 1 2.s I S I f J 11,, QUALITY OF INFORMATION f i 2 Complete and accurate I J I 1 Incomplete I I I T r V D i AANR M„tenm D.eere.entl + ! 1 ro jre+.: I f .f T G f V 1 ~ MIOatCT 1JTLT AND NW UK" Turn Lanes for Arterials - 3 each Cost: 95,000 KSPONSWE Ot'AIITKN1 AMD pYli Public Works/Engineering PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION YAP Turn lanes are an essential component in - - expanding capacities for an intersection by f . getting the slower turning vehicles out of through lanes. I1 i Turn Lanes for Arterials - 3 Intersactions fr It Oak at Carroll - northeast and northwest corners 2. Hickory at Carroll - southwest corner 3. Sherman at Windsor - southeast and northwest corners 4. Berl at Highway 380 - all four corners 5 Pt. Worth Drive at 135 - all four corners 6. Bonnie Brae at Highway 380 L _ J !I 7, Highway 380 at Malone 8. Hinkle at highway 380 y~ 94 KcKinney at Audra i 10. KcKfnney at Carroll - northeast and southeast corners , I r 4- . - I I DENTON CAPITAL 111PROYEiIENT PROJECT RATING FORM BUDGET YEAR IM-92 T~JT i i Aeewstlhe -Department: i /reject Title. -i . . 1 f w~ T c i G I CRITERIA I ITEM I I J I. NEED (OTHER TMAN 241 RIGHT TOTAL ! 2 34rlaws, iooklata, ideati HN read I i I ! ! 1 Moderate identified head I Z I 7.5 0 I! 5 f ( ow or uhfdehti tied Had f I I I 2 PUBLIC HEALTH 04 SAFETY I 2 Addressee a ajar health or safety hazard ! 1 Addresses a Minor bellth or safety hazard I 7i J d 0 All ! 3. LEGALLY KQNIK9 I I I I ! 2 Required to scot legal reyulattons I i I I I 1 Will suet anticipated legal requirements I I ! + 0 All other eroJects ! Z ! 3'S ! I I i J 4, COMPLETES A PROJECT I i ! S Required to ate useable a ajar public improvement i I J f I 2 Needed to complete in already useable public improvement 3.11 i I Adds to, completes, enhances a coWleted program J ( 0 All other projects S ADDRESSES NEED ! ! I I 2 Project highly effective and efficient J 1 Project moderately effective and efficient I 'Z ! ( 0 Project low effectiveness and efficiency j S I I 6, RELATIONSHIP TO PLANS/POLICIES I 2 Clearly advances plans and policies I Z I i 1 r I 00e1,1,t conflict with plans and policies I I S.S f 0 Con/lltts with olins_and Policies NEIGHBORHOOD 1HPACT I I I i I 2 Overall Positive effects I I I 1 i I I Little or no effect I D Overall neutive effects I I s i S. GEIEML BUDGET IMPACT I 2 Returns investment or more than investment I I I I 1.3 Reduces or avoids subsequent costs I 1.0 Little or no net impact an subspuent casts (under =10,000 per yr.) j I T.S I .S Moderate net impact (under 060.000 par yr.) I Z f 0 Hf~A ntt fmoact (under S60 000 per yr 1 I I 1 I 9 MOTOR YEHICL[ UT1lI2ATTON Re ts IA econemiea of City'a meter vehicle use J 1 impact t' v i1 i I I 12 I I 10. COINCIDES WITH MISTER PIAN I I I I ! 2 Coincides ! I No impact 2.5 ( 0 Cg0flfcts 11WALITY OF INFOAM!'109 I I I f I 2 Complete and accurate l l Incomplete o r I 2. I s I G I Met (within Deoartretm f f I 2...J ♦ 1 Y 1 M OACT TITLE A~ E Westwood Street Pav ng Cost: 235,000 ~E>ilOMlDLE 0[IIMTMEMT MID 0 vMw Public Forks/Engineering PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP Westwood Street is a residential street in ` Uylor Park Subdivision. Due to poor drainage ' in the past, the curbs and asphalt surfice have !I suffered severe moisture damage. The drainage problem is currently being corrected by the (f F Taylor Park Drainage Project which was funded in - the 1966 CIP pond election. This project would compliment the current drainage project. _ i i z I ®C7 R J ~ 1 . I I y E1at. . f Was CAPITAL INIOTEKMT PROJICT MTIRC r0A11 sum TTAA IM-14 rttMtt f : Fi ^lwa c y-t>> ~rctr ct~ca~ - I I R,~.Mllt11f 1*~~Ore L e~.Iftlet l JG} r ~rY2SC' { Ga Vr 'E ~ I ITa I I I CRITIR (Itch; 1 1[I/lrt ' ( TOTUI ( ! 1. MM (OfICA TI AN I♦) ! I I 4f I t S,rtK,a, I,~NTetr /M,t1f1N "Ad I I ibMreto 11entMod NN I 2.. I f.s I r S 1 0 Lev welde,11Irl" a I I 1 I I. PWIC KKTII OR WM I I I I I 2 Address" a u W heslth or Nfely hasard I T Addr"aes a n1"r With so safely{ MUM I Z I d I ~y I L_0 All ,eh,r ,rat.ea I I I I J. uauT KQVIM I I I I I t 1e"lred to an legal repletle" y I 1 Will nest entlelpatN lepl roatlrw,a I 2 I 1.1 17 l 0 All ,tiff erafeca I, L 1 I a. COI UU1 A PKOaT I I I I 1 tweed to ante "*&Iai a sealer Paine lot eve,M ,t I I I I I t Nowed a complete as already yletile p„ille Improvems I l i 1.s I I I I I Adds a. completes, lasuse" a completed programs I I 1 7 I 1 I 0 All ether nrafae I I I I 11 I 5. AooRtssls ntm I I I I I "Act Mthly effective aM efficient I I ! I I 1 "del .ederaaly effective and effldent I Z I 1 i 1 J 1 I I 0 Project 1a effeclijenas And 1111efener I I I ! I AILAT10MSMIP TO PLANWOLICIES I I I 1 I 2 Clearly advan es plans and pollelas I ( I ! I Doetln't cenrlict with plane and pallales I Z I 5•6 I! 1 I I 0 Conflicts with plans and 1104% I ! I r'^1 J. ME I04I0440001MACT „J I I i I 2 Overall ooaltive effects I Little or no effect I Z I 9 I► o I I 0 Overall "emotive effects I I _J_I 1. WIML IUOIET IMACT I I I I 2 Rearns lnvataent or "re than Invest"At I I I I 1.1 Reduces of avel/s sulseawnt cats I I I j I 1.0 Little er"rat Impact" mod"Mt cotta (Y,der 110,000 per yr.) I Z I Ls I r ; { .s "Nona net impact tender I60$M Per yr.l I I L I L.___.4 M,at jl a t Iwndsr 110.000 s~1_rr.l I I I t. i.,TOR KMICI[ uTIlI2ATi0M ~ ( I I R",ha is eceaamd" of City's ester vehicle UN I I I Mellow i -2. I 1 l 2 I I 0 IN "I Mu of C1tv's enter vehlelp U11 I i f 1 10. t COIKIKS WITH "Mu KM I I I ~ I t.l f M I I 1 e 1,paat I I 1 0 CsMllete I I I Il. 00ALITT Or IMPORMTIOM I I I I I 'Ce,plea and Nq.rate I I I I I 1 Incomplete I Z I I I4~- I I D Td- little Mr I I L~J TOTAL KOK I I I l l I I I L MNIK„ (within 0 l f F I r i EICHI, S DENTDM CAPITAL UpROVE1EV IAWICT RATIMi FOW su02ET TEAA 1!11•!2 laws Project TftTn c, , -t t'y < , .r 1 I I Inn I , I 1 1. MIW IOTHEI fw 2-4) TOTAL I ! I Raptors, fmmediatd idemtiffed mod ! I I ! 1 wMrate id asiffad eaN I I I ! 0 Lw or 11mfdm ifFfad Mr + 2~ T'i I I 2 MILIC HgALTN DR w m ! ! I I I I Address" a MJor health or safoly Nuard } I i Addressed similar health Or safelybasard ! ( I L-_ L i 4All w.wato I ! 3 L2uuv stOUiSIO I I It"Vired to nN l.wl re"letfore I I ! I I 1 will wt utfeiyatw teal rgliramesu I l 1 I I-- O All eeh.r ■r~wee, i r i 3.6 _ 1 7 I I d. COI LMS A PROJECT ! I i ! I 2 Repatred tr sap woalle a eie,Jor PWlIC fmpnrsagas I I Needed a Oemplete M already 1"10 public lmprsvesaet I ( 3.5 I i Adds to, completave "headed a Completed proirar I 0 All other aralacta + I I ! 1. ADOKSSCf NEfD 1 I "act hfphly offactivo led efficient i I I I 1 1 project separately effective and efficient I 0 Protect In effectiveness and officl v I S. RELATIONSHIP TO PL1WWOIICICf + ~ I I Clearly advancer Plena and policies I ! f I l Doesn't conflict 111th plans and policies 1 L ! $.S 1 11 f I 0 Can/11ete 111tH claret and aetfeiee I i 1 r^~ T. KIOl+IOR1~000IMAtT 1 I I I + 2 Oreralt positive effects { I l little or me affect I I f i I zJ- ! i I l 0 Overall naeetiva affect. f i I I I d. fiE1d;RAl Iuo12T IHPaT I I ! I 1 2 Returns investment or son than fewMant 1 1.5 Redeoes or avoids slbsaploot costs I i I J 1.0 Little or no not Impact ea eaoewent costa (wrier X10.000 per yr.) 1.1 ' Y7 I .S Moderate net Sayan! 1~ Poo= per yr.) I o Nish Mt femmrt Irnder ma 000 ear rr. 1 i I ! I R. FWN VEHICLE UTILITATIOr I 1 we t is scandal" of City's mete vehicle via l_ 0 IMnaama of eitr~e naLr vouch 1u I I 1 I coINCIDIS PIneat.4 TH wti Purr I ! I ! 2 Colneldea I I I I 1 No fout f 1 2.6 ! o eeefltee. I tl, OUALITT Op 3MrORlilt)JI - I I •Camplate and accurate I Incomplete ! I 3 t io I D YeM liatL_ wowr I TOTAL St01a I I I I P.1MR 1111aim Oot) _ 1 I Iii: = 2,1lTF r r ii i CITY of DENTON, TM* 215 E. MCKINNEY/ DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 666.8200 I M E M O R A N D U M TO: David Ellison, Assistant to the City Manager ' FROM: Bill Angelo, Director of Community Services r DATE: April 11, 1988 } SUBJECTS CIP REQUEST - OVERSIZED STREET PARTICIPATION ~ As you know, when the City of Denton requires developers to construct streets larger than is necessary for their particular development, the City is required to cover the additional cost of construction caused by oversizing. A1thoigh these expenses are capital investments, the cost of oversize street participation has traditionally been assessed to the Street Division's annual operating budget. This method of funding such capital investments through the annual operating budget puts an undue burden on the Street Division and makes it virtually impossible to develop and implement annual work schedules. Historically, street oversizing costs have averaged $155,688 per year since 1982 with a maximum expenditure of $220,336 in the 1985-86 fiscal year. Unfortunately, the City has no real control or choice relative to these expenditures as they are solely dependent on the amount of devel- II opment which occurs in the area. Thu3, the Street Division is forced each year to set aside some $200,000 from its limited operating budget for these expenditures, making it impossible to adhere to an aggressive street maintenance program as dictated by the city Council and the citizens of Denton. Therefore, we are requesting that the City, through its annual capital improvement program, establish c fund in the amount of $100,000 to l cover, in part, the oversized street participation requirements. Respectfully submitted, Bill Ang1lb ' BA/sc lba04118818 Attachm±nt C ( l w r Evilly 1 OENTON CAPITAL ImPRO NNT ►RQIECT UTtlle FORM MET MU I Wooll 1 AseaSIihe Dell rtmseta _ Wtv b, 1 r k-4 5 rer S ! ►releet Title' Ye U4 ITIX l I s i v i1R T TAl! t1 blip (OTHER THAN 22) CRITERIA I E Serlwo, I~o/1aa 1hotlff" 14101 I , wanto I"tiflw NOW I ~ ( 7.1 I l5 I I 0 Lem or awiUeti►1N and t I 1 I I to HKIC WALTH OR w m I I I i j I I Addreem a .yor bdtb or sm" haul, I O I R I v I I 1 Addresses a Moor Maltb or safety Aau1 ! 0 A11 ether awdaete I 1 I 3. UEALLT REQUTA1111 I I I I J I Reprfrrol to am legal roplations 1 I 1 11111 Meet matfefpated legal re"Iragte n l 0 All etlutr oralum 7.f-_~ E I 4. CWLMS A PROJECT I I I I I g kWmd to ads Vitale a Myor tell Is lnpraesant I I I 110e1N to Complete a ahead Vitale public fpmemset I 1 ANo to. oopltles, edwol a completed program ! 0 All other uWjcu I I ! 6. ADDRESSES WO I I i t project highly effective ant efficient i 1 ( 1 "Oct moderately effective and efficient I 0 Protect low offtetlvemaa and efficlenv ` !D i d. RELATIONSHIP TO PIANSHOLICIES i 2 Clearly advances plans and Polictos I ~1 I I I i I Doesn't coil fn with plans and Policies I oZ. I 4.! I 'I I 0 Conflicts with plans n policies f 1. NEICHSORN000 IMPACT I I I l 2 Overall positive effects 1 Little or no effect I o2/ I s f 10 I 1 0 OyaralI "festive effects I ! f 1. GENERAL E000T IMPACT I I I i I 2 Aatarme investmt of mfrs than investment I I I I 1.5 Aeduas or avolde subsequent cab q 1.0 Little or no set lpaot on oebosgwnt costs (under =10,000 per yf.) 7.1 i lr,I~S I .s moderate not lpact 1~ 04,000 per yr,) I 0 Nish "et lmract (under lf0.000 ar yr.) 1 I I 1111 I P. MOTOR VINICLE YT(LItATION I I 16111ts is lessn " of city's "tor vehicle use I No low I I I i l 0 IneraEof {Itr'a ow vehicle use I ! I f I lo. colNClocs NITN MASTER no { I I I t Cofnefdes 5 0 Welo is 2.1 I I ! I 11. WALITT 0< tN/OAMTION I i I t Copleto and accurate I 1 Incoplets 1 0 ran little. Baer I TOTAL SCORE r 1 .7 I I AAMN (within Olsartmentl L l ! f I .`9TF r F 4 i r r DRAINAGE Nlaw<oT inn& WAWA l Cooper Creek Channel Phase 12 Coat - 8750,000 KpOSIlDI[ OE MTYLNT AND INVIeft Public Yorks / Engineering I f PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION YAP t , Phase ! Cooper Creek has experienced a significant share of Denton's development boom. Some measures are necessary, such as, upgrading bridges and culverts, cleaning and widening of the channel sections, placing concrete rip-rap in areas that experience erosion (bends, at bridges, etc.), , N and streamlining the design to increase the efficiency of flows. This project has been1 ` delayed for many years because of its very high cost estimate 04,000,000). The method taken a\ 4 the past two years of including part of the creek improvements in each year is an excellent 3 step forward. If the project is started at its a t 'E ! lower end (Mingo Road) and designed upstream, ; the construction of more than 1,0001000 a year would be difficult anyway. Phase i was chosen ~---~L last year as a project for the 1991-92 fiscal ~ year. Please give this project as high a ranking as possible to help relieve the flooding that residents on Cooper Creek and its major tributaries are starting to experience regularly. warns" \ • 1 Construction would start at the point where ► Phase i improvements end and run northwest ` possibly to Burning Tree Lane. The exact limits 4 , r would have to be determined after an engineering • v rL study and cost estimates. i Y I ~ 1 a I j of i H W 4 H DENTON CAPITAL INPROYEMENT PMVECT RATING FORM BUDGET YEAR IUI -92 A Iti rtwt¢ ?c • ls~ i i pF + t Yiti fc-c.,~c .aaC- F~Y~- ITEM CRITERIA -1 SCM ( HEIGHT I TOTALI 1. NEED 10TWR THAN 2-41 I I I I 2 serious, Imedlete identified need I I I I I 1 "Pita identified nad - Z~ Z'6 1 I l 0 Low or unidntifted need I I I f ` - t 1 2. PUBLIC HEALTH OR SAFETY I I I f r` I I 2 Addresses a fa1or health or Safety hazard i !1 I I Addresses a finer health or safety hazard I y I ` I 12, I 0 All other erotecto { I 3. LEGALLY REQUIRED ! I I I 1 2 RaCulred to comet legal n9ulattnl ( I I ! I 1 will meet anticipated legal requirements I Z 3.6 1-7 + I 0 All other prasects I e, tCWLETES A PROJECT I I I i 3 Required to make useable a major public improvement I I I f 3 i 2 Needed to complete an already useable public imprevement I 3 i 3.5 1 10. T Adds to, rolplotes, enhances a completed program I f I I ! All other stUlSlo j' AooRCSSCS NEED I I I I f 2 Project highly effective and efficient I I 11~ t I I Project moderately effective and efficient 5 I I 0 Protect low ofi xtiveness and efficiency i I I I 6. RELATIONSMIP TO PLANS/POLICIES I I I I I t 2 Clearly advances plans and policies I I I I 1 Doesn't conflict with plans and policies I Z I b,S / ! I 0 Conflicts with plans and policies f l H I NEIGMBOAHOOO IMPACT I I 1 2 Overall positive effects I I i i Little or no effect I 2 i S ± O } 0 Overall nstatlve effects 1 } 6. GENERAL BUDGET IMPACT I I I I 2 Returns investment or More than investment I I I 1.5 Reduces or avoids subsequent costs I I I 1.0 Little or no rest impact on subsequent costs (under $10,000 Per yr.) I I T•5 I i~ } .5 Moderate net impact (under ;60.000 par yr.) I I I I 0 High net imeatt (under 160,000 per yr.) 9. MCA YENICLE UTILIZATION I i I 2 Results in economist of City's motor vehicle eau I I 1 I I I Me I 0 loped Increases costs of City's motor vehicle u I ! I 1 I I 10. COIKCIOES WITH MASTER PLAN ' I I I I i 2 coincides I I I I No impact i y 1 2.6 l 0 Conflicts 11, QUALITY OF INFORMATION I I I I I 2 complete and accurate I ( 3 I ! 1 Incomplete j y j I 0 Very tittle poor ( TOTAL SCORE I I I Ib~ 4 RANK Iri A Department) i J `r\lr 4y f tx)fj. 1 DCIRON CAPITAL IW MMNT PAWCCT AATIA9 FOAM tUOW TtAA I W-N I prafode Titles ~~c~-r ~---_r~ ~ I I ITIN I a l I T 1. mu 1OTHIA mm 1-41 T j t Ser/oes, Imdlau Notified road I I Pedant* ld"tlfftd "W l 0 law MAIN titld ard__ I I I I I t. NLIC tum I I I I I I Addraaods a "sloe health or tefety hesaN ! I I Addresses a now health or eafotr murd i l 0 All saber mrdsets I S. u6ALLV KOVIOU I I -I- j I t Aswlnd to no Igef rmistleas I v I 1-7 1 I I will Not anticipated lqd r.w pmou I I 3.6 ( I 0 all et►ar amactm__ I I I I I a. C011LtTq A PWKT I I I I I S mawlnd u who weahls a "Joe plilfe leprweeset I I ! I I t Nodded to aglow ea elm* sauhls pulls impresses lv I Adds wo coglouts eahaeaa a ccgletd program i.i j I 0 LUAU" erllmu I I t f ! 6. AOOKSUS Kt0 I t "act hl6hiy effective and efficient I y I I ! I Project sderauly effective and efficient I ! 6 1 0 project la offectivaness and ofNcfenav t ____I I I d. A[LATICOSMII TO PtAae/fOLICItt t Clearly advances plans and policies I ; I 1 00es0t conflict with plane and policies j Y { S.S 0 Confltcte with p lams and ealletes 1 1 { ✓1 1. htIGN110014000 IMPACT I I I I " I t Overall positive, effects { 1 tittle or no affect 6 I J`~ I I l g Ottrali naaatlre effects I I I 1 fy + e. CANERAL IWAT IMPACT I I I I t Aoturna investment or Nom than investment I I I 1 I 1.6 It"ita or avoids tubl"vent costs ! 1.0 Little or ne net impact on Iwlsgedat teats (woe $10,000 par yr.1 I I 1.6 I r S I .6 riedereu not law% (andr "O'm per yr.1 I ( ! I D Nfah me iwet swear "A am mar yr.) I I I I 6. "FOR 1INICLt UTILIZATION I ! I I I Aesulu U ace"d" if C111116 now vehicle ues I 1 Ne Israel j j t I I 1 a =atrsasa tests N Ntr's satsr rshlele Mao ! l I I I 10. COIIICIO~A YITN h1tSTIA /LAN I I i ! I t G1nNdes I I Ne formes j Y ~ t.6 I~ ! 1 a CW1lets L I i 111. QW&ITY of IWOWTION I I ! I I t -Ceglou and "Urdu I I I I 1 I Imeoaiplou 0 Mm 11tt1s. ear I I I 1 I TOTAL YOK 1 t 1 p~, I I mpx (within D"Arulnt) I l 1 _ I IMF . f E i4 i F DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PWACT TITLE AND WM A Avenue G Drainage Cost: 1000000 11E E K MI AM YI 1 Public v4orke/Engine(ring PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP K Although the existing drainage problem near Oak street and Avenue G will be improved by the oak street Paving and Drainage Project scheduled to begin in October 1968, the problem will not be completely solved until the downstream drainage system under Avenue G between Hickory and o a Prairie street is upgraded. This project will upgrade the existing system to make it adequate to carry a 10 year storm for i ultimate development. 1 i ' . 1 E r r i~ EE i ,rl ti I[MI. t DINTON WIIAL IMrAOTMC PAOJICT AATINi row IUM T1AA I W-01 I ' A i I Pretax TltlayAZA_.~ . t C- _ r.v.. " r f CRITTRIA i ltOK J IIMt ' ! TOTALI I I. an (OTMIA roi Id) = Serious@ immediate identified mod I I I I 1 "Paw Idatlffed M11 r L L T'i 0 Lew er rHdeatlffed. "a 7 I I I, PIIILIC WALTM 01 MTT I I I i I AdINled a coyer halth or safety hssarr i 1 Addressed a mlar health er safety bssard 1 0 All ether araleeta I L94ALLT KQYIAIO j ! I I I I Rguired te amt legal rogelatfes 1 will wt aatfelpal" 1ept1 reptrsaanrb - i Z i 3.9 I 0 Alt Other 1CMA r I d. CO PITH A P=KT I I I I i A Required to ode visible a mater psblle fmprwnaat I I I ~I i a hewed to Complete a Alroay viable Mile fopmemomt I I 3.1 I f I I I Adds to, ca+letaa, aebaass a completed program I I ( ! ! 0 All ether erefeata 1 f I i. AOOKSKS 990 ~ I I I I t Protect highly effective ear offlelent I i I I I Proton moderately effective and offfel"t ; L f I I ! 1 I 0 !sleet ley offeetlreee.e ue Affle/.wer I d. ULAtfONIN1P TO PLA UPOLICIC! f ! I I I 2 Clearly advisees plane and potlelu f 1 I I j I 1 Ooeen't eenfllet with plane and pal was f Z I 5.5 1 ~ J I L__ 0 Cenflleea rlth elana one eelleles I ! ~ T. bL1GN10AN000 IIIACT ! 2 Overall positive effects I 1 Little or me effect Z y U ( 0 Overall nemtfw affects I 1. GINIPAI 8VMT IMPACT F I I i I I Aetrrol lavatmeet or ears than investment I 1.5 medusa or avofb wbNgwet costs I 1.0 Little or as net Impact on I16644vent teals (under 110,000 per yr.l I i Moderate net Impact (New 110,000 per, yr.I l 0 412A net fmI U eeer t10.ame r• w..t ( I 1 I f. MOTOR Vgmlmt 4TILITATIOi I 1 of Results la econedfas of tfty's Ater whets ON owt , i I l i ! e Iaareeeea_ !alai of oily a _tm vehicle um . 110. ca1N011iI wlTw M1iTiA 1l,AM - I I I I I Coincided I I we Impect j Z t.i I I Comflleta I it. QUAIITT Or 110OWTIOM - 1 1 L I L 0 !'err littte_ tee e 1 1 I s1:oK I- L- RANTII Willie Oea:rtaantl - I 1 I al /d ~slrr 4 • J i ,e T-rm p i j{( V F . 3 I f k f I i L s ^1t ~ !llfff ..y.' A PARKS AND RECREATION 1992 - 93 a' i 17 3 LI s 3 ` ti. ati ! !R Il i k c ti&n CITY of DENTON, TEXAS CIVIC Center/ 32 f E. McKinney/ Denton, TX 7020 t M E M O R A N D U M gS ` I T0: David tllison, Assistant to the City Manager FROM, Steve Brinkman, Director, Parks and Recreation I DATE: May 13, 1988 SUBJECT: Status of Indoor Pool i, We have met with the Denton Independent School District architect to discuss the plans for the indoor pool at the new high school. We made some suggestions for modifying the site plan so that it would include room for a 50 meter outdoor pool in the same complex as the indoor pool. If the indoor pool is designed so that a removable bubble can be put over the pool during the off-season, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission may allow the Local Park Fund to assist in the funding of this facility. We are planning a trip with City and DISD staff to Irring to view an indoor/outdoor pool with a removable bubble. We hope this will assist in giving us additional information on this concept. we will also be sending down the revised site plan from the architect to the State for review as soon as it to completed. This will tell us our chances of this facility being partially funded by the State of Texas. We feel that until we get thin ruling from the State, we need to continue to recommend our CIP request as it was submitted and would be open to modifications if'State funding is a possibility. I S eve Br n an ` MEM02302 F Denton Mrke and Rk7satlon i c.nton, t•x.• i oaMaae•aaro I~ h S i ti 1 i 1 j NpROT TinE AND Mime Total Cost $800,000 Park Acquisition, Development, and Renovation Parks and Recreation Department LOCATION MAP ' PAOjECT NARRATIVE The Park Hoard and Parks and Recreation staff feel it is necessary to place funds in the CIP on an annual basis to acquire and develop newp a'0M park areas as well as renovating existing parks we already own. O This project will provide, hopefully on an annual • 000 basis, enough funds to: *Acquire 10 acres of community park land in the northeast or southeast area of Denton *Develop one neighborhood park, area that is donated/acquired by the City '0" *Renovate one existing neighborhood Dark by areas, expanding picnic 01 ~r1 0 upgrading play facilities, upgrading irrigation, construe- ~ • ting walkways, and adding landscaping/trees o. t O i s T J a' i tMOIT g OU(TOM CAPITAL (MPROYEJtMT PACJICT RATING FORM sow TM lw-w _Parks an r I ' l p UctTitlot Park Development. Asaulsition. Renovation I Iinn / CRITIRIA tress ! It1w ' i TOTALI 1. NEW (0TNgA TMAM E-4) I I I t I sorfeuso ioedfato ideatiffed wed I I "rate Identified food I 2 I 1.6 11 5 ~ { l 0 Lev er emldmatl: ied'eed I f 1 ! I 2. PULLIC IdIAITII OA YJITY ` I t Addressed a ajar health or safety hoard j 2 j j 12 j ` I I Addrnuda a of for health or safety bsard f ! ` 0 Al I othar naloeto J I ! I 3. LIGALLY 19OUl IO i I I I i I Required to an lagl wplstfons I 1 Will meet anticipated legal requirsomets I 0 3.6 ! 0 All ether erdecta I 1 I I d. COOLMS A PROJECT I 1 I I I 3 Aepfred to note usoohle a major public Iprowarn! I I wooded to complete an already useable public improvement 1 2 j 3.6 j 7 j I 1 Adds to, topletoly enhances a completed program I J I ' f I Q All orJer erojecto 1 I I I P. ADDIIESSES MELD J ( I I I I I project highly offettive end efficient I 1 Project "rattly effective and efficient ~ 2 10 ~ l 0 Project low effectiveness and effiefency I J i I d. RELATIONSHIP TO PLANS/POLICIES I t I I t Clearly advances plans and policies I I I I j I 1 Doesn't conflict with plans and policies I 2 I S.S I 11 0 Conflicts w_it~ o1~rtt and oellel~_ I t _ 1, MEIGHtOIM OOD 1HPACT I I I I 2 overall positive effects I 1 little or no effect I 2 S 10 1 0 Overall nooatiwe effects I I i 1 8. CAMERAL IUOGET IMPACT t I I I ( 2 Returns investment or eon than investment J I t I 14 Reduces or avoids subsequent costs t I I I 1,0 Little or no not Import an sabtpuent costs (under =10,000 par yr.) I •5 13.25 I .E Moderate net impact (under #50.000 per yr.) I 0 Nigh at JaMct l nor 6¢0.000 ear yr.) I I I g. MOTOR VEHICLE UTILIZATION I I I i 2 Results is #4040116 of City's motor vehicle use I I t I 1 No Impact I 2 I t ( 2 t l 0 Ineream costs of City's MJgr vehicle old I I i I I 10. COIMCIKS WITH HEATER /LAM I i I I I I Celacides 1 No impact j 2 j t.d 1 5 t L 0 CeeFllete I ! I I I 11. QUALM OF IMFORNRY10I I I I 1 I 2 complete and secerote I I I I I 1 Incomplete I 2 i I 1 6 I I 0 Yore 11 H4, Beer I f I I ! TOTAL SCORE I 1 131.25 1 RAW (within Deartmant) i E 1 2_.I 1F r V j i (7~ Me me wAme ` Renovation and Expansion of Civic Center Pool Total Cost $1,000,000 Parks and Recreation Department PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP This project will renovate the existing pool facility by: *Buildinq a new office/lockerroom p F„w~w• *Constructing a new filter system and filter O room *BVildinq lermanent concession facility and • picnic area • k *Repairing and resurfacing existing pool and I replacing circulation system This project will expand the facility by: *Constructing a new tot pool for ore-schoolers *Constructing a 'new pool for competition and '"C0"' instruction # • if *Enlarging the fenced-in area and buildinq ♦ • additional narking 3 'G *Constructing a -play area I~ ' p 4 i . t DIr1CN WITAL INAOVEA I PROJECT WINS FM EM111T S NW YSAA 1M." i ar s an 77-n ion I ' 1 I -eTlelaf oo Expansion Rer~ v o I ITLM i WT ~ I TOTAL I I I I z 1. I NO IOTKR SIAM 1.1) I A sensese iowlale Notified mad 2 I 7,6 I 15 1 McMrata ift"ifled msad ( I l I rune NlAttx at SARTT t j 1 I I 1 AIMaw/ a major health or safety Marl 2 1 12 1 ANIISSaS a Idw M410 K Safety luuud I I I ~ o Ate .......,..a I 1. UUUT FS0411110 7.1 I I I I ! Relfirol to meat 11+1 "lations j ` I 1 x111 met amtlcl led te1a1 rqutremate 1 _i iI r I a. sot'tcns A rROJC I I 1 Aghtred to i4a Vitale a major public lgrovelMtat I 2 7.S I 7 I I ! deeded to colleto an already visible public imp w I I I ` L 1 Add/ te, eerplltet, erAapes a colleted pr4rw 0 r MMSUS KM I project Alphly offectivs and efficient 2 10 I 1 Project moderately effective and efficient L`_o pre!«t ] III it n fffeloncy I 6. tEUTIOMSMIF To PLANSOOLtClis 1 Clearly advances 011nS and F0110e1 2 S.S I 11 I 1 I 1 1 i 1 Doesn't conflict with plans and I I of I 'T. 1111 801H000IMPACT j 1 I ) 2 Overall positive effects I 2 I s I 10 l 1 Little or no effect I 1 -~-I I O Oreretl neathe Iff«rs , 1. rAwEAAL SUMET 11101PACT 1 Returns investaent or more than invest"At I i's Redi or ovoid$ 1010411Mt tests { 1 7.f 17.5 1.0 tittle or me net tepact on 191 costs (under $10,000 For yr.) ; l i .S Moderate met impact (under pO,OJO par yr.) I I p Nfili Mtn sae see e.r rr.) I I S. MOTOR YINICLI mufATIoM I 1 1 I 1 l i I Results in scomomfas of City's iNter vehicle 4+1 I I ( -1 I 1 Me impact 1 H1 0 ner-..•• ••'r' C1t'e mat~x I 0. COIMCIO[f will MAM KAM i 2 j 1.S I 5 I I Coincides I I I I 11, QUALITY W SWORMT1011 I 2 I ' I 6 ` I -Cogleto and accurate I i I_ J I 1 Incowlste I I T1 I I 11 1 I RAMIE (trfth111 - J i i N I r TT= i i I i i 5 V I l ~ I,f p . Y FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES 1992 - 93 i 5^ D W w + y+ ~ 1 R ~ ,aF l ~ f~ Est, i 1 p 5 ~ 4 Y'. Q ~ ,,art I N I' 1 DENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT PROPOSED 1992-93 CIP For the 1992-93 program year, the Fire Department is proposing a comprehensive remodeling and rehabilitation program. The scope of this program includes the modernization of all our existing facilities to enhance safety, security, structural stability, energy conservation, and function. The program will be two-fold. First, we have provided a list of items to be completed for all four existing stations. Second, we have provided specific iteaa for individual stations that are unique to that facility. Finally, the program discusses alternatives such as the rasing and reconstruction of Station Four on its existing site, the } relocation of Stations One and Three, and the relocation of our training facility. Project Costa 1. Rehabilitation of Station 11 s 500,000.On 2. Rehabilitation of Station w 2 i 230,000.00 I 3. Rehabilitation of Station 03 $ 160,000.00 4. Reconstruction of Station 14 6 750,000.00 5. Computer System $ 200000.00 $11860000.00 6. Complete Training Facility !29000,000.00 4 J i 9 C ' N i V N ! FIRE STATroN sl I+ ,1 t , 3 1 Facilit~ProfilP: tl~~ / i 1. Location: 217 West McKinney Street f 2, Function: Answer fire/ambulance calls Headquarters for Administration, Operations and i prevention 3. Year Opened: 1981 1 4 Avorw number of Personnel Assigned: Operations: 14 per j 24 hour shift, Administration: 7 Prevention: 4 3. Construction Cost: 5703,000.00 F. Present worth, excluding apparatus and ` furnishings: approx. (1,000,000,00 } 7. Present worth, including apparatus and 1 furnishings: approx. 12,000,000,00 8. Maintenance Histor;- A. Overage annual expenditures: 922,500.00 b. Major repairs: Heating/AC units, remodeling of offices 9. Size of Building: 15,000 sq. ft, 10. Size of Lot: 1/2 acre Ii. Building/facility is: All electric 12. Size/Location: Inadequate for present purpose 13. r'An facility be expanded on present {nt;' No 14. Is adjacent land available for expa W OV SO 4 i II 5tation_e1+- r i Option I - Combine with 03's at Eagle/Carroll Blvd. and remodel to Administration and shop. Costs: $1.5 - 2 million Option 2 - Rebuild on present site. Costa: 31.5 - 2 million Option 3 - Rehabilitate existing facility, Costa: $500,000.00 1. Ar.w roc,f 2. Redo bsy floor Gut interior and redo Fire Fighters and office areas including upstairs area and take in ChiPf's ` bay. New tool room/storage area 5. Redo rear driveway b' 6. New furniture and appliances i. Convert one bay to maintenance bay I- 8. Incorporate EOC into building Ir 9. Redo parking 10• Personnel lockers 11. Weight room/physical fitness equipment 4 i i I I DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RATING FW BUOGET YEAR 1988-92 I__ miaatIm Dm0monfi Fire ' /^l Protect Tltlel Reoonstrxtlon of Station M I i I ITEM I # I R I CRITERIA _ I sew I WEIoHT MALI k I I. NEED (OTHER Trout 2-4) I 2 Serious, Inoadlah l/entiflad nerd I Moderate Idmtlfled need 2 i T.s i Is I 0 far or unidantlfMad need I 2. PUBLIC HEALTH OR !AFETY I I I I I 2 Address" a major health or safety hazard I I I I Address" a minor health or safe" hazard 1 2 1 6 ( 12 I O All other erolects I ! f 1 3. LEGALLY REQUIRED I I I I 2 %qulred to mat legal rsgulatlons I Wt ll most antlelp0ed legal roquI amts I I I 1.7 I 5.5 1 0 All other protects I I I I k I I 4. COMPLETES A PROJECT I I ) Required to mako useable a major public Improvement I 2 Needed to •oplats an already useable public Improvement j s ),S { 7 + I 1 Adds to, completes, enhances a completed program--- I i I I 0 All other cabled" I I ! I S. AOOIIESSES NEED I 1 2 Project highly effective and efficient I Project moderately effective and offielent I 2 I S I to I 1 6. RELATIONSHIP TO PLANS/POLICIES I I I 2 Clearly advances plans and policies I Do"n't contl let with plans and pot leloo 2 0Conflicts wlth plans and DOIleiea i 7.f i II I 7. NEIOMORNOM IMPACT 1 2 Overall positive effects I I Little or no of feet j 2 j s j to j 0_overati negative effect. I I I I 8. GENERAL wwt IMPACT. 2 Returns IaMliNV +",W' we `tw I1"Si mt, J ' } ,R I I I 1 I.s Bache"" we,ti d4 eYMee4M s { " :t= • , ' r I I I 1 1.0 Llklo Qr, no net (hw..gl, ease'" idea F.il~} 'fir t r.1 1 7.5 1 11.251 7p4 , .S Moderate not lepaet;.fufldet Yf•1' + 0 High net Mpect (MildW A." -e I 1 1 9. MOM VEHICLE UTILIZATION I 2 Msalh In eeonoolea of city's motor, vehicle use I I I I I heat? 0 I nerwaa aah of City's enter vehicle Liu 1 ! t 1.__I 1 10. COINCIDES WITH MSTER PLAw I i { 2 Colneldw I I No iepaet i : i 2.5 i ! 1 I-~-ca~frreh It. QUA! ITV Of INFORMYITION I I I I I 2 Ceeplete and accurate I I I"1111% i 2 s i 6 0 Merv II"LtL.1w 1~ SAL SOOIIE I I I 91.711 .f,_,,,~MNK (wIM1n Deearfnant; I I I I ~00)k I i I i K4' i f !I FIRS' STATION 14 P r• ~ i Facility Profile: 1. Location: 2110 Kings Row 2. Function: Answer fire/ambulance calls 3, Year opened: 1966 4. Average number of Pers)nnel Assigned: 4 per 24 hour shift 5. Constru^tion Cost: $165,000.00 6. Present -4orth, excluding apparatus and furnishings: approx. 9400,000.00 T. Present worth, including apparatus and furnishings: approx. 1543,000.00 8. Maintenance History a. Average annual expenditures: $6,396.00 b. Major repairs: Heating/.4C units, painting 9, Size of Building., 4,264 sq. ft, 10. Size of Lot: 52,520 sq. ft, 11. Building/facility is: All electric 12, Size/Location: Inadequate for present purpose 13, can facility be expanded on pr-sent lot? Yes 14, Is adjacent land available for expansion.' Yes 1 t' s i J . j r.6 1 • .c I I StBt on t~ Demolish - Rebuild usinir psistinR site Costs; lapprox,l * 00$,QQ0.g0 - StatiQn k'.•+ 250,000.00 -,Apparatus 30rgP!P9LPt}y „being rebuilt 1 1000 , T R I C1TyoIDEWON,T1WXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76,V? TELEPHONE (81 -1 $66-8200 ~ n~ns?aana~~ TOi John F, HcGranet Executive Director of finance FROM$ Harlan L, Jefferson, Risk Manager DATES February 4, 1988 t SUBJECTS ASBESTOS UPDATE On January 210 1981, three air samples were taken at Fire Station No. 4 to datermine the firemen's exposure to the asbestos located in the south interior will of the station. The measured airborne asbestos fiber concentration at 0,002 fibeca/cc is substaniilly below OSHA's acceptable level of 0.2 fibers/cc j in workplace alto Therefore, we recommend, before removal of the asbestos at this !ocattons o Completing the inspections at all City buildings and prioritising them according to exposures o Painting the mouth interior wall at this location (this will further [educe the exposure level)) and o instructing the firemen not to tear at or damage the south interior wall in any manner, Attachment 1 indicates the results of each air samTte, and Attachment 11 Identifies the locations from which the samples were taken. Please contact me if you have any questions. S Harlan Lo Je "e-a- HLJssjn 8Cs /John cooks fire Chief Attachments 1159► 3 J t} ATTACNMENT I ASBESTOS AIR SANFLt RESULTS sample Asbestos concentration Threshold Limit value Location.: -Z fibers M . a/cc• + !!bars >S i + i Break Room r.c,4bDH viddle, jp~,~~i A'N :"K~rT♦ Sleeping Rjom a -.A. rids .I !root sleeping a F:+f;~} Ark 1- i o- f J al fibers !6 p/cc - number Of fibers loaW ttawr 5 soon per cubit centimeter of sir + R ' ..l.. 1. ~ ~ #yM ~ ~ ~ ~J V t Y ~ r 31ssr f 3 ATTACHMENT 11 CITY OF DENTON Fire Station l4 2110 Sherman Drive Denton, TX 76201 (Diagram not to scale--not all details -3hown) i Break Room and Sleeping Quarters ~ I Re- i triger = ator t Bed Bed = Bed Bed 'r-~ Break Room D Middle Sleeping Room ; ( IX Table Front Sleeping Room i ( z j BedEBed ; Bed Bed s 51, 1 j i !k i TWA j 1 2 f i I Y i ff t i F i I I j 1 I I~ 1 1 J tit cr.rt: r! ,a f i f d~ k x I i i t A d MUNICIPAL AIRPORT RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS 1991 - 92 1 k ~ I t 1 i ( d Culj} 1S 7 ,Y f 4 G Rt:z 1 !i Fa,~y~IVrp i I i FOXIM TITLE AND IMMKIt Road Access to South Nan ar Area Cost - 900,000 MIL MLN ANO pYlalON J i Public Works / Airport PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP Road will allow for the development of the hangar I ,II C» ~t l ~ i project proposed b Airport properties Incorporated. ' by r \ I This road was deleted from the current S.E. corner er ~ r ! I ..w 'S project to provide fundinq for immediately needed to provlde funding for tmmediateIy needed • 1 pavement maintenance on the runway and taxiways,' - y~OL1~roN~ M i 4 i • E 1 PROJE e ~ + I r ~ ~ r ~y t I { 1 z IT a DENTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRDJECT RATING FORM HOW TEAR I W-92 j /Ap;,aleet Titis: f 1 i E, CRITERIA I SITEM COIIE I 1[IGMT ` I TOTALI ( 1. NEED (OTHER THAN 24) I I Serious, foodlate Ideatiffed need I I I I i 1 Moderate Ideatiffed maid I I 7.6 J I f ) low or mnidottfled need I I I/ S i J 2. PUBLIC IEALTH OR SMETT I I I I I I Addresses a major health er safety hazard I I ( I I I Addresses a minor health or safety hued I I 6 I U I I 0 All ether srofacta ( I I ( i 36 UGALLT REQUIRED I I I I I I Rwfrod to meet legal "141:1001 I I I I I 1 Will meet anticipated legal requirements I O J 3.6 1 I 0 All ether erot«ts I L j 4. CONFUTES A PRwECT I I ) I I 3 Required to make weable a major public iprovement I I I I I I Needed to comptote'an already useable public improvement J J 3.6 } J 1 Adds to, completes, ophances a completed program l 0 All other orolects I I I i ) I 6. ADDRESSES KID 2 Project highly effective and efficient J 1 Project moderately effective and efficient I 2! 6 I /Q I 1 0 Project low effectiveness Ind effititncy J I I I 6. AELATIONSMIP TO PLANS/POLICIIS I I I I I I Clearly advances plans and policies I I I I. I Doesn't tens ict with plant and policies I 2 I 6.5 / I 41 0 Conflicts with plans and DDiitht i I I / I 7. NEIGN1011M000 IMPACT I I I I 2 Overall pcsitlve effects Little or no effect I ~2 I 6 1 i 1 0 Overall negative ff*ti, f I I I I B. GE19Al1 BUDGET IMPACT + i ! I J 2 Returns investment or more than Investment I 1.6 Reduces or avoids tubsoquent coats / J I.O little or no not Impact on subtaquant costs (under $10,000 per yr.) 1.6 J J .6 Moderate net impact (under $0,000 par yr.) ( 0 Kish net imsact (under no.000 par yr.) 9. MOTOR VEMICII UTILIZATION I I I J It Results is aconamiea of City's motor vehicle use I f J J 1 No impart I I i I I 0 Inemki ealL o/ Cflv'e motor whlefa use I I I J 10. COINCIOE6 NITN MASTER FLAN J I 1 i 2 Colncldes J 1 No Impact 2.6 I a Conflicts I i 1 J I 116 QUALITT OF INFORMATION I I I-i I 2 Complete and accurate 1 I601010A _ 2 f 3 6 I 0 very little. poor I ---TOTAL SCORE I I 1 90 i L. ,_AANK (within 0egannAt) I I I / i k i i ~Y I _ F r~~•r11-\MI w •rl• •11•I• rrn a ~I W YI• rVlplr w Illr wW. ~w• rr 1M IWM ~i rr^r•Z •r'•r ~ ~ ~ (QI w•~i i•~~i rro ~ 0 1l t r ~ r 1 r~ •~••rw~rw.r r'.~. M r• .rte 1rA rl. • ~ .rte t I# 61%d • M NO IIHII MY••M•iMM = VM••N : MN•.M►•••YM M••MMY•r.r~ Y•Y-yM ~0y r11M Mrs , - r r r r r r r • •r r r - - - r rrwrrrrr w ~ fi r r rrww•rr •,i r r,w rrY 1 r ~ ~.w r r w.rr r r r r r r.. rs.q r rr - - r r ~R i i I I TITLE AND NII KH Infield Drainage Improvements cost - $709,280 TYEM AND DIVIS" Public works / Airport PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP j All the drainage of the airport infield is piped through tin horn pipe that was tnstalIed when the f •II c r" V I ai . All of this °~•I \ airport was built in the late 19Q0's pipe is rusting away and has been patched in several •i ~t places where tho issue ofsafety was involved. wn! r~; ; yr,J~ r p Other areas where pipe has collapsed has caused erosion problems if notsafety problems. Before AE any more of this pipe is built over as the airport •.y 1 expands it needs to be replaced and so reduce the t cost of replacement. Money spent on this project S can be used to qualify the City for Airport Improve- E went Grant Funds reimbursement from the F.A.A. (see Iv. attachment on federal Assistance Programs). PROJB I V J L1 I • ~t 1 f ' rs ` i r t• .y I w s f DENTON CAPITAL MOVEMENT PAWICT RATING FM WOGET YEAR IW-52 ' utlb* n:CRITERIA I SCM I 191W I TOTAL(OTNEi T2-i) 1 1 I I 1 + rl 7.6 I ~ S I + 1 MNoderoto 11Mti tlod " d f f N "W rC: l 0 Law of unli etifled MI - I I I _I 2. ►u6LtC ItALto OA SAfiTT I I I 2 Adb"W a major health or saw hazard I I I ~2 I I I A~Addroaea Iralw health or of ly huard i I ~ I I I -0 II 1 7. LLCULT KGIIIKO I I I ! ' I I Re"Ired to Most legal regulations I I 1 7 1 1 Vill most "tfclpated legal rMir"ests 3.6 j~ l I I 1 0 All other /raiats 1 1 1 I 4 . CMUTTS A FROM S Required to Mae ueebta a major P411C improwaeet 1 ' 1 1/0 SI I I I 2 Nailed to complete," already u+eable public fmprov ant 7,6 I Ad" to, complates, eeh"as a completed. program I I I r 0 All I 1 6~ADOKSSES Ke 1a I 2 "act highly offective and efficient I 1 6 1/0 I "Oct moderately effective and efficient I I 1 0 Project low ffactivaaest and efflclen v 1 I I l I i. R" I TO PLANS/POLICIES 1 I I ` 2 Clearly advances plans and policies l I I I. 1 Doesn't conflict with plans and policies I I 5.6 I 1 1 NEIGP601H000INPACr n n l 1 I I 1. 2 Overall positive effects ( 1 S 1 1 1 1 Little or " effect I I__ 1 0 Ovarall na~+tlw effattl 1 a. GtKAAL 6000tT IIIACT 1 1 1 I 2 Returns iovetteent or more than investment 1 I 1 1 1.6 Reduces or avoids sub&*"% costs I I I I l.0 Little or ea net impact on subsequent cosh fonder ;10,000 per yr.l 1 1 7.6 I/,S I .6 "rats net Impact fader 60.000 per yr.) I ( 1 1 0 Nigh net imeact [under 1626000 per yr.) 6. MCA VENICL2 UTILIZATION I I I 2 Results is ecoecdes of city's motor vehicle use 1 1 1 t ( I 1 1 No lout [ 0 inereues eats of Citv'a motor vehicle use I I I I 10. COINCIKS wM AMR PLAN I I I I 1 2 Coladas I 1 I 1 1 No lowt 1 2 i 2.6 i S I [ o eaaflicta I lt. OuALtrT ~ IwFOAIr`TtoN I ! I I 1 1 n~capl lets accurate 1 ,2, I Z I I I1..rSd' IlStit- Me I I - I ! I~T~~-, I - I I.9f7SI ' I RANII fwithle Daartsent) I 1 11 I .a P ya 1 .WI. WW. Mn ~ ' irl iW dllp M I rO° ela o\wr ...I. rw am YOM •row i ...~wr r~r. $Mac NO I wo ~ s.. ~ . .y. r r =v=M rur= r r~i. _ r 1M rYYt WI \\•rr ' • ..1 i fit = rrr• rr•_s •"""-2'fL r-`J //~~"rw .rte S !~a --Tu .i~..nW U~. E-1 r ►r W\r• ' rr=Ir•'•'L / M ~i" ~ ~ r a rr\rr..r r••r «Yr•««« •\rr.Y rr~'•'rr. r~rwrrW rr MW.~wy'Wrr~• r rYM•.MYNYMYM = rWFM WrI rYMr MMY : MMW. r\Yr Yrr r r ► r r _ r _ W r W r • Yyti rY\ r W.Y ' W M IV MI. rW.•. r r + r rr~rr r w ,r r \.r r 1 r r • ~ ~ motif, r • POWAII T I f i PWACT TITLE AND NINNGI Land Acquisition North 17135 24.7 acres Cost - $1,075,932 N1 A UPM79EN AND DIVISION ' Public Works / Airport PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP Land depicted needed for clear zone protection 1 ,jE p„ l U. of the approaches to the 17 end of the runway. 8111 Holt from the Chamber of Commerce estimates the present value of the land at $10,000 per acre. The value of the land by 1992-93 estimated by Mr, { J ? I r O Holt will be $1.00 a square foot or more, Present 1SW purchase price $247,000. C.I.P. money requested _ for 1992-93 is $1,075,932. All money spent to ' S j purchase land by the, City can be used to qualify for Airport Improvement Grant Funds reimbursement from S the F.A.A. (see attachment of Federal Assistance A Programs. Request in accord with Airport Master Plan). i i i l Ra ~ YROJE M Y• 000 Ipp Oj~ ' Ali tt` ~yy tl a ~I r 6 DENTON WITAL IMPANEKIFT PROJECT WING FOAM sum YEAR I W-12 M rtmeett Ao, Poo, 716 i ni/ I7 4<' 9i 7w~.rt I ! 1- . = K TW 241 CAtT[ IA j I I 1t1iM ` TOTAL I 2 Sertm, faedlets ideatlffod mead I i I T "role 1datitted Ned I I I 1 0 tar er wide,KtHd mat 2 7.6 I k to w6tcc NMTN OR wcrr ` R A'O'•wru a ayor health or a" hasard 1 Ad meo a minor bade or safety heuN i j 0 All other a Feats 1 I S. f.UCALLT XQV:KD 1 I R RWPW u mt IWI mpulatfons J i ! 1 will acct matlaptsd 1epa1 ro4rirmlu 1 Z 3.6 0 11 I 4. concres A FAGIUr 7 S Rs"Ifel to make usable m major public lmprov~ ! I J ! IJ A Needed to caplete•mm already usable public imprornat I ' J J 1 Adele to, comploust esbuces a completed props 316 I I '/D~ S 1 0 A11 ether srnl.ete E ! 6. A00KSSES XG I i I I 2 Prgleet hlphly effective and efficient ! I Praject moderately effective and efficient I z I 6 ! /0 I ( 0 Protect tar .ffec•_trasaa and efficiency ! a. MUTtalsyn To PLIINSROLIClu I J J I 2 Clearly edunca plans and policies I Daen't conflict with plans and policies J ! 0 and oalfNal I I 1'6 L-1. NEIGNSO 4000 anon IMPACT I I f 1l j . ! 2 Overall positive 0 *96 ! I tittle of m effect i 6 j I 0 Overall mutlyt effects i S. G09FAI KWT IMPAtt I / I f I 4 ! 2 Retum favestmant of more than Investment 1 I, I 1.6 Redrew of avoids 6149e49en1. costs I 1.0 Llttls of ono net impact om subspueet costs (under 110,000 par yr.) 1.5 ! .6 McMrste met toped fum" 160,000 per yr.) J V 1 0 "lob tie lame fundo' NO W0 I i ! 6. MOTOR TAMNCU UTILIWIum J ; Assllts fm II of City's motor vehicle use I I I mpatt ! J 1 1 0 leeruw costs of tit", motor vehicle uit r / I f / I 10. YN u11a NOW FLAN I ! Impact. 11. VGA STY OF INFORIfl1I0N i 1 r I 2 'Complete and accerata I I I ! I 1 ln~empT.te i 2 i 3 TOTAL Yves I ( ( I t ahem r.~t.r. eh"ea~t1 i f 1 f i E ~ 1 .I •1 1 • a a . f'1 1 ExOS=tDq J~GWa 6.7 No" B0i1AY NN - . UREA ~ • ' .J• l 13.5 Cres ROADWDWAAY Toy CoLg n0, %ANtrporat MAUGHeo>\ Denton Mvtkt T WA DITION Y I Coe ' 4.2 M S + I RU WA-Y / n ~ f • f u(~ 1007 ar AY take Ex ACKO . rl loft... 2000 \8, / , Beal. ` o ae,, 46 e F)G. 5A PROPOSED AIRPORT LAND ACOUISMON C IA f 31 1 i T FIGURE 8.1 PROJECT SCHEDULE PROJECT SCIECAU 19" 1991 1995 2000 2005 isi' . a « C i nd Ac u1s1 rth RLn R- a r zom 2 a custon ms CUM IM 3 A t - r°63» w F- 4 Construct Cosssettls1 Service A PRO 6 Construct Fs0 Pavtn I 6 Construct T-Non r Access Road mace I 7 Construct 6+ Fire Water Ig1n # ° a a, $a ifary sever m Ain construct 6 10 Expand rmin It Construct North Aircraft Rold1 Aron 12 l a Count A t 1 Consty t West f 14 e Mo 16 Construct Parallel Taxiway to Rvnw 7A- qt w- 16 16 Construct Stub Toxlwe ss~x 17 Construct Mot Aircraft Parkt Aron 16 Con cruet 7 - ' OOM ' 14 Construct Stub Taxiway Southeast of Rumw M-762 w 20 Construct Taxiway Vast of Exist1 Terminal Area Construct Air-craft "A Extenia -22 trust southwest ccess Road to future FIO area 23 Construct Ikons Rad to Future Can Sere Area 24 Construct t7l•MR Extenlon 26 Castruet PsraliN Taxivo Ext. 6 Mo1d1 Aron 26 Contruct $*Fire miter win to/Appurtenances _ is Construct 11,I.R.L. for Fvturs Runway UL•768 29 Castruct P.i.R.le for Rung 17L-J6R Exteaslo 3O Construct CFR Fsc111t1n LH, seruct a se MNt %tMait Industrial Tract ft Mm 93 Castwot Ter'u1na7 Fec11tt1H 94 Construct Terminal Auto Parki Area 2 Construct 6+ F' Water Win 96 Construct as sanitary Sewer M410 8.7 1 - R 0 f t, I f 1f~ 1 MOACT TITLE AND WUW A f Land Ac ulsition North utilit RunWa 13.5 acres Cost - $538,060 E THEN AND OW16N1N Public Works / Airport PROJECT kARRATIVE LOCATION MAP Land depicted needed for clear zone protection of the approach to the 17R end of the utility runway to I .I~ C.. be constructed as per the Airport Master Plan Study. T { Bill Holt of the Denton Chamber of Commerce estimates ~ ~ yam, ~ the present value of the land at $10,000 per acre.. t{ The value of the land by 1992-93 estimated by Mr. 1 t?t ~ O Molt will be $1.00 a square foot or more. Present y #NTONf • r purchase price $115,000. C.I.P. money requested , • t •I { for 1992-93 is $588,060. All money spent to purchase ! • 4P land by the City can be used to qualify for Airport Improvement Grant Funds reimbursement from the F.A.F. f (see attachment on Federal Assistance Programs). L 1 Request in accord with Airport Master Plan Study. • f PROJE ' I i - 14 • y., i 41 1 ~f 6 OWN CAPITAL IWFMDEMT PROJECT AATING FORM WOG[T TEAR 1917.92 r-~•*stineaaoertMatt r;.+r _.J 4..r..s tect.: L.~rf .n 'r+.~ //+T, M,vr•r 14,5'wr '1 6 T I ITEM I I I CRITERIA I SCORE I 11IGHT ' I TOTALI I 1. mm (0T1ER TO 2.41 ( I J f 2 Seriouso la"/ate identified need f I J _ I I I "rate Identified MN 7.6 I I I 0 low or WidadlflN I 2. WIC "I'M OR 3APETtr I f I 2 AIMaa a Wof 114410 or ahty head I I I ANlt1 or safety AWN m a law L ! 6 All e eralsets 0 I S. LEGALLY NQUINO f I J I I 2 Regeired to meet legal "lations I 1 Ni11 .at anticipated legal "flow is 2.9 1 0 All ether eraMYte I 4. LOPLRE6 A PRWLCT I I I i S Required to make usable a maser Public full Oweeent I ' I j ~ I I 1 l Q, S j 2 Needed to co"Iste'so Already usable public improvement 7,6 1 Adds top caoletese embams a caolotad Progress J 3 J Y f I r I a All etMr oreteeh f I 6. AOORI:SSES NEED 2 "act highly effective eN efficient I I I I I Project moderately effective end efficient I ,Z 6 ! ~Q 1 0 PrajgSt 1a effectiraose and efficiency .I l I 6. RELATIONS41P TO PLAMS/POLICIES 1 I J J i I 2 Clearly advances plane and palictes I I I i. 1 Doao't conflict ritA ,tees and policies i 2 6'6 I ~1 0 Con/Ucta with Alans and Dolf" NE101+90RH000IMPACT I I I I 2 t"rall Positive offatts I 1 j 5 I l 1 little or no effect j J I I I 1 0 awrall naafi frecte GENERAL sucotr lIiACT I f I 2 Returns favestMot or more than investment I I I I 1,6 Reduces or avoids subsegwet cats 1 I 1 I 1,0 little or so net impact on subsequent costs (under ;10.000 per yr.) I S I 7.5 lA25 I .6 "ratio mat Impact (under :60,000 per yr.) I a M1eh nee imuct fonder 960 000 Der? rr•1 9. MOTOR YENIM UTILIZATION I I I I 2 Results is !Commies of City's m ut 04hicle Yee I f J I 1 be laPeet J 1 I 1 I r J I 0 leerasa eats of Cityra Utor tOimle use 10. COINCIDES WITH MAMA PLAN I I J 2 Coincides I I 1 No INWt 2,6 I I 6 0 eaollets I 11. QUALITY OF INFOWTION 1 I I I j 2 j I 1 ~appleeteeN accurate I 0 Very tittle Doer I 1 RANK (rithin Deearbeetf .2J i Ilk 46 J' U f : •~e~ cwv~r! L. •y~ 8 17 A. M-PoRr MUMY 4 ' WTO 8E ! : ;u,:• • u 8 Ck U IED f a eg/ l~# 14I 13.5 cre~ ~'.f~ f I AOADWAY row col! UQNA0 RLWWAY 1 xfWAY ~•15d6fltOfi Muldpej 41lpat ' TA AITION .fir. .r..u~ r• Q • 4 f . e ~ e ~ ' ; car ceo . 100x' x 73 ' AMWAY t a ISO, j 1000' A I +YAY ' 1.1...10 ` ..Z ' EXT4N&0N tit poet. r FIG. 5,4 PR ED AIR"T LAND ACQUIS ' SON ' ~ 1A t r I 4 I +E~ I 1 ` i I FF"CT TITL9 AND NIM KR Land Acquisition South 17/35 31 acres Cost $1,350,360 A3 K=Iftl N AND CIVIlION ? 1 Public Narks /Airport ~ I PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP Land depicted needed for clear zone protection of I Al % - ` the approach to the 35 end of the runway. Bill 1 Holt form the Chamber of•Commerce estimates the \ present value of the land at $10,000 an acre. The /I value of the land by 1992-93 estimated by Mr. Holt ' Y I I (1 1 r 0 will be $1.00 a square foot or more. Present XLTON~. purchase price $3100000. C.I.P. money requested ~w.,..., ~.I for 1992-93 Is $10350,360. All money spent to purchase land by the City can be used to qualify ~`c 1 1 3 j for Airport Improvement Crant Funds reimbursment S 1 from the F.A.A. (see attachment of Federal Assistance h I Programs). Request Is in accord with Airport Master Plan. +d - PROJ6 TM . tIE t PRO 41 . I I Mt. y r , S • 1 1 rir if 1 I ti DENTOM CAPITAL IMROMENINT PROJECT AATI16 FORM MET MU 1907.92 A stf rot rtannn tt- Protect %~+r t ' Ti t1dif env n. /7C{C w ITEM i CRITERIA I SOON I 111"T ' 1 TOTALI I 1. MEt9 IOTI[R TIMR t-d} i ~ I I I ! Semouso immediate fdootlff" treed I I I t Nttderau fd«ttffed ueef 12 I ~.a I fS'" 0 La er M16aiffed med 1 I I I ! ! I 2. , PILIC "TN OR w m ` I I: Ad&Mn a nyor hwtth or safety hassrd I I i I f f` I T Addresses a orloor health or safety Rwrd 1 2 1 a ~2 1 ( 0 All other ersfu- } I s. L2a UT Rlf ulma ! I I I 2 Rewulred to Not legai regu14111086 I ! 17 I I 1 ,fill wt anticipated legal rewuirsommu :L 3.6 1 I I i 0 All ether mrsfectt I a. COIPUM A PROJIT I I ! 1 f I R Rewind to site weshle a major. Public lmptrowev K ! I i 1 2 Needed to OMIO 10'as already ulubla P61 1C laprov Wi ( 2 746 110, S' I 1 Adds tot eemploae, enhances a completed probra ( ✓ I j 0 All otMr orslects I 1 1 I I ii 6. AMSSIS MM I I i I I j 2 Project hl6hly effective and efffcfent I I I s I /V ! I 1 Project moderately effective and off want I ~ ! I 0 protect ter ffectfrw" and efff4f~nev f_ f I I i 6. WTIONSNIP TO nANS/POLICIES I I I I I 2 Clearly advances plans and golf ties t I I I ! I Doesst't conflict with plans and policies I 2 I 6.6 I /J t I~ 0 Cenflau with along sod col ki I I I I -I. NI10104,00 IMPACT I I I I 2 Overall positive affect$ ! I ! S' I I ! I Little or ne effect a I 0 overall namtfvo affects i ( I I S. stNERAL kMT IMPACT I I ! a RaWrss investment or 11010 than fevoltment I ! I l.a Radueaa or &"Idl subsequent tests ( I 1 I 1.0 tittle er no net impact on 601104uent Costa (under }10,000 per yr.1 I S I 7.6 I //JO?r I 86 Nederots let lmpaot (under, $60.000 par yr.) I I ! ( 0 N1ah net lmsoet lundar S10 000 Yr yr.I I I 1 I 9. WON KNICLE LTILUATTON I I I I I AM11A is oc"ll of City's motor vehicle we I ! ! 1 t I I I I~o sc ~f Cosa of City'. "top vehicle us10 I ~ ! I 10. i01~ NSW M MASTER PLAN I I I I I so impact i d2 i t.6 1 11. Q ALITT Or IMPORMMTION I I I ! loceeiiplow low auurat10 :L S ! E O rare Iota. near I ToTAI ORt I i I 7 i M (Withinry ;rtYntl ,J 1 :i ,t N Y E STINf3 JiJ CKMMSTA'i1Q i ~ ' ~ 1,APG TO SE / :'',u,:• ' 6 eq'@S ..-F' , ACC~IR® t NEW 13.5 crow ROADWAY TOY COLE R0.. S AL10NMW fnEAUON[D ' RUNWAY Denton MUWPBJ Airport ADODDITWiON o IN I! r e O . : e 0 f N 1 CUT N C&C 4,2 Y I I ; 1 41 4000' X 73' , ' RUNWAY / % ' . % 1000' R / AY ~ r- EX t.4...20 , TENON I a 1 .r , 1 aCR~ i I 10 :r• t i r I r 2000 I FIG. 5,4 PROPOSED AIRPORT LAND ACQUISMON i r a f F~ I M L FWACT TITLE AND NUMW North Holding Apron I R !yL[ DEMR N AND DIVOMR Cost - $570400' N1I Public Works / Airport i PROJECT NARRATIVE I LOCATION MAP r Project promotes the industrial development of 1 .Il c.. ~,t ! 1 ' west Denton and is in accord with the Airport r Master Plan, I D~4TON r r 4 r. N , 'This project eligible for F.A.A. funding at 90120 , splitr i.e., Cith cost $5,740, _ PAwe J ` h4 i i 1 ~7 -1 ~S I ~tTf 6 OWN WITAL IwNWICYT PANECT RATING FM aIu" PEAR 1!07.93 I R ttt rtnentl irn.ir I Project ncnt ivnr e n ry.. it,r r' /nv,n t, 7 U/in 771n CRITERIA I s< 1 IE16NT ' I TOTAL] t. rEto (oTMER TlNM:-il I ! I Z $MOw. fwdiete ldutlfted sad I I I I 1 Moderato Ideagfted deed I 0 tow er 01011Ntd iiwd I I 1.5 /S~ NKIC "IN 04 Mem I Addraaeaa a %W health or safely huaM I ` I I Addresses a afw Maltb or safely Murd I !`ALLfR~O ~ I 1 1 ~ I I t Regetroa to net I*") rogulatius i I 1 Vill wt e,ttclpstW legal rWrorests j j 3.6 Q I L 9 411 oft I i. MUM A MIUPdT I J 1 I 3 Rageirod to She rseaNe a uJor rAlfc.tnprovemat ! i I i I Needed to cowlste'u alroW usable WAlte 1#0 owreet I 2 i 7.6 I 1 Adds to. awleta. ubaaas a E441eted progrn i I ( 0 All e!A•r •PaIKU 1 1 1 I i. AOORLSSIG IRm I I "act highly effective and offid"t t ) "od oodaratoly offoctlro wA sfficlset I ~I i 1~ I L 0 Pealed Isar •rf•elfwuee and I fielomy 1 1 I D 1 I it UUT1013K TO PLAMSRO I'd I I clearly 464n0es plant and potrcist I I I I ~ t Ooaa't conflict rltA plant and potfcpt I 2 I I I . l Mliett with slant ehd ooliciet ] ~ 6'6 ~ / ~ I r to mGwSpVllfoog TwF41 I I I I. I 3 O"fall positive effects I I Little or ea affect I 2 I 6 1 /0 1 0 Overall Aasetlw •r tlI 1 I I I 3. OINERAL OuDOtT IM►ACT j I I I I Rateras fmsbost or ales "aa favestuat 1.6 AGARes or awids u6sequAt cats I ( f ! 1.0 Little or me mot loped al uAsoqueat cote (under 110.000 per yr.) + sl 7.6 I 96 Nodeftu fat Caput (aedw 00.000 per yr.) l 0 "fob net insect !under !60 000 Nr yr.) I I I I 6. MOTOR V WCW YTIUTATiON I leaps to Kowa$ of Cifya6 rotor "little Use T No tryact l l / I 1 0 IKCMUt cede of 01ty'a star "W4 oN I I I I lo. c0MIM V M Rt3TIA PLAT I I I I I colscida I e_ ~Iwe j I 2.6 11. 9MITY 01 W MTIOM I I 1 I I 'Woo Am accurate I tamplou 2{ 7 16 W12, 111,11t1g. I I RANK IwltlllA 4artnNt! I 1 JI i} F' rt I~ L F• Ulp~ rw rwr rer ~ xMi r =r rww ~ rr D .r rr _ / . t • My 1•M 1 ~ 1 •w IINII LINO Y rl M N M +rY lG_ ~+1•..y~~Ywy~ • titiN M M ••Y •••►M •.r NMyy YM•yr~M w11 • ~ • Y ~y ~r A Y • • ~ • Y • • ~ Y • rY. N.wI•r~• ~ .1 V MM=1•iM~i .~Jn~ ~ • 1. M • i ~ ~ T 1 I AM4~ CT TITLE AND WAWA Runway 27135 Excension 1000' Cost - $234,600' #24 l E DEPART---- AND DIVISION ! ' Public works / Airport PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP 1 Project promotes the industrial development of west Denton and is in accord with the Airport y ill Master Plan. y DEkTON' hThis project eligible for F.A.A. funding at 90110 splits 1.e.0 City cost $23,460. PROSE ` I I J ' h q • ' r f f 1~ j I f 1 I 7 t V f 6 OWN WITAL IWAOIEKKT PAQJECT 0.114 I'M R1i0gIT TZAR 1WtI . P 5' r /Ar,.nh ~O ;ty CRITERIA i StQR[ 1 1E10411' ' I TOTAL 11 Ka (OTHER TNAN 2.1) i (J) Seems Immediate ldatifles Sad ! 1 Nsdrate idmstlflod "M I P, I 116 I t. II~IC YLALTN OR SAPITY 1 I ft I AMAasos a n,)or health or saf V Murd I J ! I I i JVAfts W a OIW MOM or whq hwN 6 42- acts, E {{_.La T REQYIHYO i I Ie1WrW to most legal regulations II I i o Wila~ uttc~tsd legal rowrMlete I ;L 3,6 i ~ 4 ii 1 1 I i 3 IgWrN to Sake Usable o savor Iwblic:lgrove"d +1 1 I t a low to asgleto " alra* usable PAIIC laprovemmst J z + 3.6 1 I I Add tea awl"He whams a completed program J I I 1 0 All hkml Warts I I "Oct blply effective and offielat g, St ooderattly effoctlre ad effielat -2 J 6 # /0 } 1 0 Project low affaetiraaas and effIcIth" f t I I J 6. RMATIONSNIP TO PLANS/POLICIES J I Clearly adwscas plaas and Policies I I Call's cwflfct with Plans and Policies 1 2-1 5.5 1 1 0 Canilietm 11th m lena and oelleles_ 1 I i HEIlit60 OM Im I I I I . I Overall positive effects t little or No effect 1 21 6 116 1 1 0 Owralf naaliw oHaets 1 I 1 1 I. tCIERtl111068IIrACT I I I : UWM lwateat or Were tha lavestsat 1.6 11441111 of 1"146 subagveat costs I I.0 Little or se at iso"s. on saspuat costs (wider 110.W Per yr.) j 2 j 1.6 j / S j I .6 Medato set tepees (wldr $60.000 Per yrJ I ( J i 0 Kish in 1_w_st 1o ft 11110,e00 no Y.-s I 1 I I to IIOfOR VWCU DTILIIATIOY J I kmlte is ecowel of City's our "hicle uses I I I t No b"d I 0 Imeraua coats of eltv'a motor vehicle use I I t ! / f 1 lo. a CColssld IMSTEI PUM 1 is lout 1 1 I.6 lieta f I I 1 Ila 9 ALITT W ZWOWTIOM I I I I I ; " 1etsed ""rate oc J 2 J l 0 YIw silly. We I 13 1~1 1 L~ TOTAL~~ I I 1 4 i I X r A ~Up _ I a i r, r• .•i. • Y•. rv two Wriw ...r... M .r.. .r. .u. I r ~r..•rr wr r•..~' = Mw1 1 •w. IHII • I . .t7.'~ I w ~ r,y Y•~Tr ~ = MM MNIMM MI•M My'~.•MM NMr Yr•y y MYMM•.y • MMyMMMNI : f•Y N M : • • f■ r • r • • • rr w•••wr• Jim r V I• r • rrrs ri • • r rrr.~r •wrr i r • r r r r r • d 6 k` I I' P w I f I t PIIO,KCT TITLE AND NUWfR 111fff N.r.R.L. Runway Extension Cost - $14,000• [ p29 R E K THEN AO gYisio" tl ! ; Public Works Airport PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP f ` .I! ; e.. { Protect promotes the industrial development of I west Denton and Is In accord with the Airport Master Plan. ffff wfth ~ • I f ~ - ~ ~ y~Ekron' I *This project eligible for F.A.A, funding at 90/10 vo ' split; i.e., City cost $10400, f PAOJB !I I k M ' 4 \ AF 7 9WAWAId k 1 I ~I 6 DEVON CAPITAL INAMDUT PAWECT MTIA6 FORA WD6ET YEAR 1W-U f l /ref~etTltl~! ~ /n~rne,' .Hill. / rne~. Fvlent.nrt ATIX U iI zon I 111 oil 1 TOTAII 1. Ka cumn n m !-e). f I i t SerfemA. lMdlate identified mad I 1 1 I 1 Worato 16Mtifted awl L 4 low or Imidentl fled now I to PMIC If,ALTo OR Win E t ANwsu a m W twat or sa" >Iu.rt I 16 I /.z i J 1 AUntws a Adwr twat ar wfmV Murd I 1 1 I I 0 All ecter eralects I S. 116ALLY AEQRwa I I ` I t cared to mot lepl rop IAMm , I 1 I ! I 1 Intl met aetlc~ted lopl, rWdrorats I 7.6 I -7 I I 0 Alllls~R..1rit 1 I I I I 6. C016'LMS A PROJECT E ! I I I S AWrod U Arco oudle a n,;ar pudic improvement I 1 1I j ! N WW to c mpleta'u alrwb nublo p lic lapnvnset I 3.6 11W I 1 Adds too co+ldoso wMacos a completed program f 1 I 0 811 Aft protects I 6. AOOWAM Ilia I I ( I "Kt 111 1 effective and afflefant 1 I f I I 1 Prgloet moderately effective and officled I ? ( 6 { /v I I I 0 /!'elect few offatfvanass and offleleeey i I I 6. AELATIOMSKII TO PLAIISROLICIES E 1 f I I I Clearly advances p1Ans And policies I I I I. 1 1 oceset conflict with plans and polkils 1 ,`L f 6.6 ! / / I 0 CenjNets XU glans and e0lWas I I 1 ,~I l. 1114H10J11000IWACT I I I 1 , 2 Overall positive offetts I I I I 1 Little or eo effect 116 f/(} i ~0 Overall Meatlw effects I 1 l._.~a, I mum levestwat or on tma investment I f I I 1,6 Redacts at avoids wtsepuost cuts ( I t r- I i.0 Little or so not impact an satapwnt costs (wider ;10,000 per yr.) ' I 2 I 1.6 f of Moderate met loped (under ;i e= per yr.) I I I 0 Niel wt imoaet tundtt U0,00 ear yr, 1 I I I P. MOTOR VMCU YTILIM11011 I I i I t Rnstts Is V.04066 of city's motor 41cle un I I I i I I be impwt I I 1 l J I 0 Increases MIA of City's motor iclelot 10. colmaOCS Vm mm PLw I I 1 I 1 i wiis~t 1 2.1 t.6 1 1 1 I !0„ tenf1lete I ~ 11. pIALITY a EtrtOR16ITIOM I I I 1 1 :14411ptl~ a«Araq 9-1 S 1 1 55 f10F I nl 1 . r 1 I ' i 1 Sr, . 1 'r t N I I r♦. rw rn . rura. ..r..r ~ ..+•r aY.m ' ~ ~ w w •rr I 'l sw.• .r rair I ..rl urww i.7 D M Y. rr. YrY - / } rMY ' •r / L11 IIHii IiHil M Y Y y y Y Y Y y .Y y y rir±~i.lr 1 ~ rY~rr~~, ~r I..ry rIN Y I IMM•I Y: IY .V •••~.•♦YMYrY NM Y.rM♦•YY r•r♦r~ .+.r'r'i rri. NMYyYYYw j•ywwMMY MY- • ♦ r r r r r Y Y r ♦ r ♦ _ I r ♦ r r r Yrwrrwr_ r r♦ r r r r ~wr'i..•~♦ ♦ r• r r r r yw ~w I wry- ~.+r•T~.7.g+-~~ ~1'!•r j~ 1 1 tF V I PONIXT TITLE AND NUWER Parallel Taxiway Extension & Holding Apron Cost - $158,000' K E DEPMTMENT AND DIVIS*N i Public Works /Airport I PROJECT NARRATIVE W LOCATION NAP Project promotes the :rdustrial develoixwnt of west Denton and is in accort; ..'#:h the Airport Master Plan. r ~l N r 0 DENTOR • r ' *This project eligible for F.A.A. funding at 90/10 split) i.e., City Cost $15,800. YEOJE ATI a « r J \ I W ' Ife1 t ~~l ~ 5 •I l.in T f I~ N ! ' (6 OWN CAPITAL IWIROlEMIT PAAIECT MUM FORM t 6OOGET YUA IOU-" Aeewtllne peeartaeats I Maisel T1tUt ra 1 e Inr i r rny.n . 8 D >`fr7A 1 ITTX ?5 CRITEAfA 190011[ I YIAMr ' I TOTALI i I. ICED (OTHER THU E-4). I ! ! t. I t Series. lredlats Idastiflad seed I ; I I Msdaeto ldsatifled mood 1 2 I T•a I /S I f i l 0 Low ar wldeet w Heel f1 J I t. M LIC "TM OR SAFETY I I J ! I R AMroesn a WJOP MMIN Or ufejy Mold I I I I I 1 Am*"* a ahoy Match sr safely luurd i I 6 11L 1 j A. LDtaAUlLlr I Sets I ! I ALgIMO I R Required to teat IWI tapatat(eas I I j 7 I ! I hill amt asticlpow 1p41 rwAreeaats =.a i i I I I 0 AlI ether ewiects I 4. CWUTU A PROD MT I I I I I S Required U ndns eaoalo a uJor FAI1c.l1pro01at ( I I , I 1 t Melded to coaplets'aa alrstq Usable pMllc improvement 1 3 I 3.6 I/0,5 1 1 Adds toe cesplttes, odwaas a cesyleted pe"raa I I I 1 o All eeh KOroaeset 6. = I I I I R ?"Jut hlahly effective tow of Went I I I I I "Oct woderstely effective and efficient i I 6 I/D I I 0 Project low effectiweess and efficiency ( I ! I i 6. RELATIOMSKIP TO PLARMPOLICIES i I I I t Clearly advances plans and policies I I I I. 1 Doesn't conflict with plans and Policta6 i 1 S•6 I I I [ 0 nfi plans an policies / ilE(GKWMi000IWACT I ! I I j" 2 Orsrall positive affuts J ! i I T Little or no effect I 2 I S 1 0 Overal) neative effects J 6. GENERAL MUT IIMACT I ! I I Reterns lovestmot or more tMa tavettatnt 1 ( I 1.11 Redacts w evo146 weae4wat cotta I I I j 1.0 Little or as sat lowt a a6se4wat costs (under 510.000 per yr.) ! 2 I 146 I S I .a Moderato "t lepact (ender X60.000 per yr.) I I I 0 m1b NJ lowt jt wor !60.000 ever yr.) i I I I i. Moto V ICU 11TIMATIOY I I I R Rsselts la eco6wos of city's actor ve4lcle m ( I 1 l / I j t me lepact I 1 0 tossed casts of City's motor vehiele ale t I I I 10. COBCUOES wn-N MASTER MA J I I I ! 1 Notulapct 1 2 I I ! 11. QOALITT OF IRFORIIITIOM I 1 Ie~carpl low aowratr I t 16 ' TLC T noar•, 1 I f ____I' VeAL 9C 0AE ry 11et1e. I I I 1 i PAaK within Oloortaent) 1 I l I E' MP I t a.~rw~•.■ r '-may _ w S rn .•.r ftw a w r.r rw• w •or nw..nrr s~° 00 U s==ue-~ •..rrr f •r•ie •r•. w r w 1rri•rr rrr r . rr ~ w _r- D ~ aw` - !rrr •r %L!"Y l r . rw • e f rte x zl~ I INII ifNll MMyyyMY YY•M w- .YY.M•E- . YY~MM•• = M.V YyM MIMyy yyy Yy.. rMrw.. yy•! rr MMNYyY YYNY. ~ ~ ~ r ~ M M y : • • . r . . . . wti.y.w wY r r•ww r•r e rw..r•.••. 1 a PIIDW TITLE AND N~II Stub Taxiway to S.E. Industrial Area Cost - $60,000* #19 ! IIEINKME DEMINTMEN AND DIVISIDN {61 I Public Works /Airport PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP \S ` , r ~ Project promotes the Industrial development of I 'Ili T" ~ west Denton and is in accprd with the Airport Master Plan. y ~I ~,r• `rfA I O ~DE~TONT i-. E X \ f ti~ rIn R *This project e'.igible for F.A.A. funding at 90110 , split, i.e., Citj cost $6,000. PROJE j LOCATI J w 1 All r , 1 M.. ~ J i rt' t f d!T 6 DEATOi CAPITAL IWAOYEK11T PROJECT AATI)fi'i IOU r um PEAR 19942 etl rtewntt hens f' T fu Wy y u~ Sf Oin[n n . iii ♦[w • 0,7V0 ~00196600 CAlTiAlA I SCORI ' i I[I61R ' I TOTALI 1 1. ISO (OTM 1" 8.41 I 2 Wa s@ Insdista Identified MN I 1 Moderate id"W144 swod I ! 7.6 i 7nS j 0 Lew ar ueidentlffed iiaed i l f I 2. HKIC "TM OR w m ' I I AdkmoW a nor Nalth w utety Ruerd I I I I s 1 Addnssw a Nner bulth or Wely mum I Q I i 6 All ether armaete f i 1 I i I Wred eo net legal regutatless I 1 W11 net aaticlpatod laial rWrsmeats I I A•i I O ! 2 All eaher eroleeta i r r r I 4. CO UnS A MW CT I s RWmd to ado weable a molar public.14roveesat f I I I E I 2 Reeded to co plato'u &If** Usable public isprovemest I / I 3.6 13 sl I I AWs~c"leus. emhaaces a completed propru A I I i! 1 mralacts r I I L AOOW= Rita 2 Project highly effective uw afficieat ( I Prolact moderately effective and afficfeat f 2 I 6 I I EE r 0 Protect low effectiveteu an-4 efffcfeou l I r I I 6. RELATiOMSMI► TO PLAYSPOLICIES I I I I I R Clearly adwnoes pleas sod polIcies I I I I. I I Doess't comflfct Vith P1aes and policies I 2 I e.6 I / / I ,.l s kith plans and DollcIts f 1' L 1. KIOR6ORIIOW IMPACT I I I I. 2 Overall positive effku I 1 I i { I I Little or no effect I I 6 (/D I 0 Overall neatfve effeett I i I I I 0. 611cm NUT IMPACT I ( 2 Returms feminist or more t1w isveltaaat ( 1.6 Redrees or evolds wbaequeat costs I I I I 1.0 Little w m0 set ieptct on subsewwtt costs (order 110.000 per yr.) I .2 I 1.6 I /5, I 66 Moderate met Impsat (under 006000 per yr.1 I 0 Mieh moat fowt fwnder 060,000 Der w.1 I I 9. MOTOR 1t1 = YTILI2AT10M 1 f 1 1 Re 1a acatmin of City's motor w4lcle use I i I l am mu of Citv'a now vehicle we I I f I 110. Culeclois xmi MAm PLAR I f I i I I CoImclMt I o f 1""; i 2 i I i 11. QmITT OF 1wFORlIATIOr I I I I I Coeplito and accurate i Iacaepleta S l 0 rani little.... r I TOTAL 9COAt I I 1 64 I ! Mot Mthie Dewrt.entl I I r "1911 i I tQQ~ 1~. 1 M AOp .2 nor, Jim I W. MM MMI N. ~iW MY ~11Ow 1M YYMr W 'Y• M IIOr N.r ~ N rr M I _ r .r. rr •~i~r ~ •.rr••~~n~~N Y• ~ t a _ rY• rr• r~ ` r'.ww ~T~?r wr rrT u u-..x ' i.L.M.-i w. ~ v'T • - C IiHIIIIHII M..as ~ r•~~w++rriw w rw• wr ►s~rr+Z~ ' N~•rwi•~ ri~w rji~•.rriw • w. . M Y : YYN...•~Y..N MMMMr YM = NMMY MNMY YYY•YY rIHM : • • ~TIILL ~ • • . • Yww Y•r~Y rr= r• r. UAELL • Ywrraw .r . • r . . r Nr Fq J V r C MIDIECT TITLE AND w)mK't ` Commercial Service Area Paving cost - $121,0000 NQ ~ ` AE t KPARTMENT AND DIVISION i f Public Works Atr rt i PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP Project promotes the industrial development of West •II Drnton and is in accord with the Airport Mast^r lug \ Plan. i• ~ ' ~ ~J~ • ~ lIf ~1TON' • r t. , *This project eligible for F.A,A, funding at 90/10 P ` 1 split/ i.e. / City cost $12,100, 1 PROJE LOC 1 . ~ I I , r i I i4 I f fYY t t i V 0 DWON WITAL IWAOYEKNT PAWUT AATINC FOiUI WOUT YEAR I W-92 c !tl ttaa t ,rgyr 1 CIIhMNt•I - 0-0. ` I TE11 I f, NEIO (OTKA THAN Imo), C TA JAM + fitfaR ' 1 TL l i I SerieI inmate idutiffed "I ! ! I 1 "rete idutftied so" I I L I I 7.5 j 7, 5' j ! rp fwfllIC IfALT1f oR sAV~Tr ! ! Ad*tsm a wdr IWAIU or so" Mtt/rd 1 I I I I 1 Adhesea a mfaor bola or safety Mtard I D f y f d! 0 i S. tEQALLY KpIlIKO I : Ae9ulrw to not loyal royulations I i I I I I I Will not utictpatW loyal requfrusats o A 3.6 I U I ! 4. CWUTIS A PROJECT I ! S RpuirN to rMce waaele a motor polite laprorwnt I I I Pleaded " COOPIO e'u Ilrw4r 0141 Publle ilprowrat I I 1 Adds top Co"Itstesp eelasas I C"lstw prqru 3.5 i S. AMKSS[S NEm I I "Kt l/plty effective and efficient ! ( I ! 10 ► oJeet moderately effective and efficient rr 111114 nd rrr j I S fe i v ! e. REUnowsiur To vrrwsivalc:ES ~ i i 2 clearly advances plans and policies ' ! I I I Doesn't conflict with plus sad policies It C i f A an nd if 1 1 2- ! 5.5 ! / ! r.w. NE IONIOIW0001wACr I 2 overall positive effects I I 1 I 1 little or to affect i i 8 r "MmILIffim- S. fIENERAI RWA7 IwACT i I R411I IamtmkAt or more than Ilvesteent i I ! ! 1 1.5 RaI or avofds subm"t costs I 1.0 tittle or no let fapact on w sepwat cats (under $10,000 per yr.) /10 + f.s i ! .5 Noderate mot flout (undo $61 per yr.) I 0 Nfoh oat fineut {under 550 000 per yr m I R N001 tENICU MUZAT1CN r f f ! 1 PlReseIts to searomfa of City's motor vehicle m i ! l- 0 lnewaus goats of Citry...~~ v.hlel. ~t+ ! 1 I 1 1 I ro rerwrp■S ■un neural rMN i j j i 1 Cafectat I I i I i o c...awfet-~ I Z i L6 I~ 1 I il." TYfTYf OF 1NFORIMTION ` I J Ileteaed aaurato I f f mpt f 2 i S I ! ( Y'Yny mrttle poor i r ~ I v 1 r Q I~i:i ra..r a artrat) l r r~ r{ r l i t IJ, i i V a IN ULM r~ .ten ru .Wa. w R.., rtw Y... w. .u.. e. .e.,. i i7k "•`~r w L ® • wrr • w• ~ • Fr 4/ a ~ -Tr--T-- rr •rr • w.-•rw •r rw nr ■ r.r• rr i~ 1.~-~r-~•wr • r Mw . F1 • YYM••MMM : = YYr-Y ti•YY•1MY•~✓✓wN : YN•rYMYM ± -Y YN : • ~ w.+w rr•r.r - r r r, r -r - - ► r 1~•~11-VPMM 1 j `1■r 1 I I I~ } f I 4 ~ {6 I 1 }IWECT TITLE AND NUIMEII fl FBO Paving Cost - $72,500 B5 E E FMYNEN X4D DIVISION I I Publi Works Airport i PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP j Project Promotes the industrial development of S ,I~ s.. ~t l ! w west Anton and is in accord with the Airport Master Plan, r O A64TON DUN I ~ t E PROJE AT I f p.r IW r 1 011ki t OJT 6 0617011 CAPITAL IWMEKKT M UT AATIMG FOAM sum YMA I WON ? Ro ra tin Caper lse ! I f+refeet T1tfe! if . v r3 /F D k 2 R 0 S00 ~..6 r IltiJl ~ SR11tR1A i + 1E1WT ' I TOTALI I 1 • ItE77 IC7190 TW iri T I 1 a sensors. imamate fdatfffod new I I 1 1 NO" to idatlHed med frldeetlf/eI gird y's ! / I 0 toga I . MKIC wA oR SAFtTY I I I I } I t Adtaaeea a wK health w 84" huurd 1 I I I I 1 Aft"m a Nwr health :f eefepr huarl J ( 6 1 I o Att etbr enesr•!e 1 1 ! l 3. LEW,IY RBf)YIRLp ~ l I Reared ts set topl repletion I 111111 set anticipated led re A Maat11 1 0 ' 3.5 1 ! 0 Alt odor f I RMJ d, CpLM A 1roT 3 llegalr" to add. sable a "Jar prllfc, faprovasnt Ii I Noe" to Complete '&a 41"* wally ppblle laprovasat i 316 L 1 A46 too ca+let"S osbauts a completed pmm I 0 All_ft srelects I 6. AOIIK=S mm I 2 prefect hlshty offeetlve cad offsclat I Fr**t Moderately effective and efficient I I 6 1/0 1 0 project la of/ecttveneae and efffcleeey f I I i I 6. RELATIGIS41p TO KMS/pOLICIES E I 2 Clearly Wwneet plans and policies I I I/ I. 1 Doesn't coaflict with plant and policies J 2 I 5.5~ 0 Conflicts with efam and aoficits , IE IG1110M1000 I WALT I 2 Overall positive effects J II 0 Overall ""tin Little or no effects 2 5 b 4. GMPA sum law f 2 Retwu favestaeat or more then investraat 1 1.6 aedpca w soofds aabsepunt costs I 110 little or no sit lepeet os wbsegaeet Costa ("r;f0,wo `ear yr.) 14 S 1 f.6 1 11,25' I .6 Moderate net fewt (wader 1;60,000 per yr.) 1 I I L-- 1112h net fwet (Coder 1110 m Per Yr. I 1 I 1 I to MOTOR VMCL9 UTILIZATION J 1 A iu In ecomwes of city's nor W41410 Use 4 impact f l i l 14 in conc. ee eds.. 1 top Y&C16 ale I I 110. C01113013 YIT11 I~Am Km i I t cofacfda L o' ~l 1 2 1 :.6 1 s I1, QMLITT w iRiOAfRTION i I = 'Moto sad Saw-ate J 1 tetaplete i 3 ! ~JI v.ry 11tt1e Boor T07AL trOtt I AAMK lwftai■ Oeee►t~rntl 1 1 F i I ! ~I 1 k. Y ,I TL w.1r A ll•b 1 I ~ M r ••YY YMI . Y `pC~ M MIIIIM y~Y Yr• YaN IYOM 1 1 ~ t { .API L _ I • rY1Y - lei. ~''r ~~C ~ ~ LLGSo~-,~~ MY ~•~w.l . r ~ ~ { ~Y~pY MYlwil l! I D`■cy 66■■■■6/y a ti ~ • 4rlr••• • F I rro• rr• I -TW J~+~ • _y ` ~irY r w~o I ~ I 1 IIHII II~ICy rYr I 1 Y.~•~jrYw, !r/r•~•r~r iM •plr Wj• , •M y•YIrMMMM•.y y.•MNYM ryYw wv YG i~•. Mr • Mr.Mr yMMYYY+Yy NMMMyyy y~++~ r • y i r Yr Yr r^ y w w • • • ! ~ r' r r + • r -14444. rY.w wr~•r Y~ r r r r rw`~~+•w ~ a r + r r rwrrrwti vww 1 r i w I ` I f I MDJECT TITLE AND NUMK* Executive Jet Center Aircraft Parkin Cost - $180,700' N9 E A SMLL giIARTYLN AND gY1310N i Public Works / Airport f PROJECT NARRATIVE LOCATION MAP Project promotes the industrial development of west Denton and 1s In accord with the Airport Master Plan. fte~ r J c, ! r O t 1 • yDE~ ONI S 'This project eligible for F.A.A. funding at 90110. ` L sP110 i.e., City cost $10,870. PAOJE s a J i !l ~ o'r. ~ 1 f S~ t .,o 1." • 1 I 6 OWN WITAL IiPAOTEMENT PAAIECT RATING FOAM IOWET YFAA ISU•SZ # 9 I ITEM I I CAITCAIA I ww i NEW 41 TOTW I 1. KO (OTNIA TNAM 2-4) II I t Serisw. iM»Naa identified wed I I I 1. L T Modena IdentiflN ~«t I 2 1 fns I /S I 0 Lea er iwleestlf9N need I I I t N Lii MIKE a win I I I I O Adreaes a Mster MaltM or safely M urd I I II h I I Addresses MaltM or safety M urr ! I 6 i l i All Ift aw1ects 1 it uwuV "1113 I It wred to meet lesal reswatiow I I I I I Intl ant aticipated 1101 regwnalats I I 7.6 I O I l_ o All ethw erefaets I t I I a. CCMPUTEA A ►AWWT I 1 I r I i M/ysirM to alts waM1s a wjw p4lic.lopro ewt I' 1 ! I I Needed to wa+lete4a alroao wedle puMlio imprwealnt I 2 3.6 17 I { 1 Adds We cogleteso edunces a coopleted prosna I I I I 0 All Issues omfecto I I ( _I i 6. Aaoasscs No I I I I I A Pni1ck AIONy effective and efficient I I I I I I h4leet Moderately effective and Ifficloat 1 2- 1 s 1/0 1 1 0 Preect log lf'*l9.tivi MS and efffelteer I I 6. A6LATIC1124P TO PLANSOOIICi[s I I I 1 I I Clearly advances plans and pollslas f 1 J J, I I Oossa't conflict ritt plans and policies I 2. I s.s I / / J C411001 { . 11100011000 INPUT I 2 Overall positive aHetts I I Little or w effect J 2 16 1/0 1 1 0 Overall eeutfw effects ( I I I J S. KKAAL MU IMPACT 1 I ( I 1 t Raw" lwestuat or sore a" Investment I's A46M or avoids suMseeneet cosy I I J ~ 1.0 Little or so wt input on vAse wat costs (under ;10,000 per yr.) 7.6 t I .6 Modena set i"t (wder $0.00 per yr.1 1 I 1 0 Nish net Itttut fender la0.000 ear yr.I I I 1 to MOTOR WAME UTILIZATION I I It Alwlts is econwes of City's Motor vehicle ON I I I I t so "at i 1 1 I/ 1 1 0 Increases felts of city's Motor vsAle1e_111e I I I I 10. Cosy MS um MAS1Fr PLAN 9 Coincides 1 2 1 =.6 I S~ 0 ;Wlltte V ALITY W IMIOA 7100 1 I h~cagl tieing accunti [ 0 Yew Tittle. seer I II - II b _Il TOTAL stews - J i I 1 4 N. r C FO ~l.p~ - M r Yr YY. o I.VOW M fip.r ~ rr .wn. N~. T.~. rw nc.r. E mom= D M Tr ~ +a r•r ~ r QQ 1 ~ I r ~ JT ~ Tyr r = T~YT.YT.MY.,Y,VyYYY = : MMM,. IM MYYM ywT. TT~ COY ~~yM ti~~. • ~ r ~ ~ • . Y M M M M Y. M M ♦ M . T • • T 1I Y ~ T r M T yh.YY..rr. - . T A T =.Y r.r ~ . T •ry. T . . T 1~ M\ A Y~ •R.Y~. ' ' ~ ~ .11 Yr.. T/W ■ T T T T 1 f 4 I i 't i I nrrTimn Ell= LEE= I i T :i 1 I ti f I I SUMMARY OF REQUESTS FROM PUBLIC ; AND z , , , ,E J { MASTER RANKING 1 w f r " " I y'A rI) I i I 1 198b CIP REQUESTS AND RESPONSES FROM CITIZENS, ORGANIZATIONS AND INSTITUTIONS RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT REQUESTS, PROBLEMS, COMMENTS Public Works Joe Burris Need Utilities to follow I proposed extension in West Utilities Denton/Airport area. Need City participation in extension of road Public Works Bill Holt, Director of More road and utility infra- Economic Development structure is needed in West Utilities I Chamber of Commerce Denton near Airport. Masch Branch Road is a good start and next critical need is section of Loop 288 that would link 1-35W and 1-3SE. ± Utilities Aliie Miller f Property along Masch Branch I Road has been in City for b Public Works years. Masch Branch Road street improvements are in CIP but would like to see utilities put + I I In before road work is done. Utilities Paul Hayygood, Pastor own 10 acres at NW corner of Life labernacie Bonnie Brae 4 Windsor and water, Public Works sewer, road, sidewalk and drainage improvements are needed. Drainage study needed for entire area. 14 1 4 CIP Requests Page 2 RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT REQUESTS, PRORLFMS, COMMENTS Public Works Dwight Burrell Neighborhood did informal 1100 Parkside traffic count at Bonnie Brae Denton, TX , 6 Windsor and observed approximately 10,000 vehicles. I l Recommend doing official traffic f ` count. Utilities I Larry Frank I Spoke on behalf of W.H. Smith ' P.O. Box 2753 who owns S2 acres on corner of + Denton, TX 76202 Payne Drive f, Bonnie Brae. + Waterline sufficient to serve existing and anticipated needs should be put in along Bonnie Brae before road is improved in I next year or so. Public Works Rodney Haire Request widening and Improvement I Liberty Church F, School of Bonnie Brae south of 1-35 Public Works Eleanor Swan f, Severe drainage problem in Lorene Wells W. Oak 6 Ave. G area. This t problem is supposed to be fixed 1 y Oak Street drainage project and would like to know when project will be done. Planning Ms. Barbara Buchanan I Sidewalks are needed throughout 2609 Howard Court the City of Denton. Public Works I Denton, TX j J i . N I CIP Requests Page 3 RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT REQUESTS, PROBLEMS, COMMENTS Public Works Jimmy L. White GTE will bury cable along General Telephone Masch Branch Road starting at Jim Christal north to 380 W. They are aware of Masch Branch J improvements scheduled for 1991-92 and will relocate ! facilities if necessary. 1 Utilities Ray Meckel Sanitary sewer needed to Denton County Health alleviate problems in following Department areas: (1) Carricorn Mobile I Home Park on Hwy 380 E $ Geesling Pl.; (2) 380 W Denton Estates Mobile Home Park; (3) Mayhill Community (Gayla Rd, to Mayhill Mobile Home Park. Utilities Walter Kingston I Lives at corner of Mayhill and Gayla Drive. Property was annexed about 2 112 years ago and there is a bad sewer problem. 1 Utilities J+ Mildred Cie RRgg Need sewer line down Mayhill 11101 S. May9fi l Road. f Denton, TX 76205 i Y 1 I 1 it 4 ' • ~ i ` CIP :C.• ,,!sts If Page 4 RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT kESPONDENT REQUESTS, PROBLEMS, COMMENTS Duvall, President Planning Wallace iness District Several improvements needed to Central Bus Public Works Association improve downtown with eneral descriptions being: (lj i Utilities appropriate and distinctive signage in ajld leading to City Managerps downtown area; (1) better parking designation (immediate need for more handicapped j spaces) and development of E I additional parking; W con- tinued street maintenance and improvements; (4) maintenance, repair or replacement of deteriorated sidewalks; (5) solution to unsightly waste , i containers; (6) distinctive lighting; and (7) 4+reral k,' I beautification effa,-:s. I Utilities Norma F, Gene Gamble A. Water f sewer should be Public Works extended to this area which has been "i nored" for too long. Utilities should be 1 Installed before road im. provements are made to Bonnie Brae. r 8. Assumes both new fire stations will be built at r the same time. 1 1. r CIP Requests ; Page S RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT REQUESTS, PROBLEMS, COMMENTS Public Works rFrederick R. Pole A. Conduct feasibility study for Vice President for refused derived fuel (RDF) Academic Affairs power plant. i I N1SU B. Replace asphalt paving on Bernard Street from Eagle to Hickory, j C. Study traffic patterns and j` movements within and through the area bounded by Bonnie Brae, Scripture-Congress, I Carroll Blvd, and I-3S to furnish data necessary to 1 I review and modify the comprehensive street plan as appropriate. Public Works, Gilbert Bernstein A. Joint City-DISD indoor pool Assist2nt Superintendent for at the new high school on Parks 6 Recreation Business Affairs E. McKinney with school DISD district possibly advancing I total cost and City over four providing or five its yeshare ars. B, Traffic signal at Loop 266 anC Kings { C. Traffic signal on E. McKinney `J ! for the new high school. D. Lrainage problem at Strick- land Jr, High School. (water coming from Coronado North Aparteents) E I Y~ i N I r p CIP Requests Page 6 RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT REQUESTS, PROBLEMS, COMMENTS Public Works Housing Authority of the A. Widen and improve Bonnie { City of Denton Brae from McKenna Park to Highway 77. i i J B. Widen Kings Row from a Pickwick to Dunes. Public Parks Denton County Home $ A. Extension of Loop 268 E Apartment Builders Association southeast Denton. B. Improve Robinson Road from i Denton/Corinth city limit to , r F.M. 2161. C. Improve State School Road from I-35 E to the Denton/ Corinth city limits. D. Widen Kings how all the way to Loop 268. f E. Improve Hickory Creek Road. + F. Improve Ryan Road. G. Four lane extension of Eagle to Mill to Morse tc Loop 286. H. keroute heavy truck traffic away from Universi'.y Drive i ! and TWU area, particularly. I 1. Standardize speed limits on Hobson Lane. I + I I 3/26/6b M9M 1 J i April 24, 1988 t Tot Mr. Sill Claiborne, Chairman Denton Manning and Zoning Commissioi. Fromt Residents of Ranch Estates l Re: Petition for Street Improvement a we, the undersigned residents of Ranch Estates, do hereby respectfully request that the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the streets of Ranch Estates be rebuilt to city specifications i.e., with a lime sub grado and asphalt pavement, and that this request be placed as a high priority in the current Capital Improvements Program. This petition is presented because the existing roads in Ranch Estates are all seal coat roads with no sub grade and, in most instances, are so narrow that when two automobiles meet, one or both of the automobiles must drive on the dirt shoulder. In addition, the roads are in very poor condition, e.g., there are numerous depressions and numerous places where the pavement has buckled and i protrudes well above the surface. Both of these road conditions make for a very rough and uncomfortable ride. In conjunction with this request for having our streets rebuilt to city specifications, as residents of the city of Denton for the pass eighteen years, we feel we have also been neglected with regard to such normal and necessary services as proper drainage and appropriate street. lighting. Therefore, we respectfully request that the Denton Planning and Zoning Commission also recommend that these grievances be addressed immediately. Name Adds S a~tC~ 1 JNij-AMMIAmJC_ _~11v1~~ Gq--- K42,t~ 3807 - uy 1 l~ i ti f Name Address Signature - ° L , s~dpSllMo-- --=-`-`=-=-GG='-__- ~1~ QQ f - - r U ` ~oo~Gt~s---- -A I f Name Address Signature - - - - J~ Zia- r - - 3`_07-~~!!~=? - - - - - LOA /A 7d Zen A o d_ _ J ao13 - - ~ MCZ U 4 Name Address Signature ` i .w----------- _ ~k z l. 1 i l w _ _ - w _ • - - - - - - - - - - - T - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A' I N t I z c1PRaRR1 THIS FORM 19 KING PREPARED DR..... 20-Apr-/8 n THIS 19 THE MASTER C.I.P. RW1106 SHEET For the Denton Capital iaprovealat Protect Renting Fara. lud et Years 1991-93 I I ...1. .............1 Total + Prolec! I Total I Protect I Cuuulitive I PrOlect + Pink Title 1 Score I Cost I Total I Cost + ..................I..........1........ --I .............I............+ .rol. . of Ink/raections 1 103.501 235,000 I 130,000 t + 1 Signals For..Cont. 2 Turn tines for Arterials 1 103.50 1 95,000 l 95,000 l + 3 Traffic Study - 11111 1 103.50 1 10.20,000 1 95,000 1 + 4 Drainago - Dal I Ave. 4 1 103.50 1 100,000 1 115,000 1 ► S Palling - Square, Wrale or late 1 103.50 12-51000,000 1 195,000 1 + I 6 Parallel boy Ectenslon i Molding Apron+I 102.50 1 11,170 1 445,179 1 1581700 + 7 Alivander Skeet Drainage 1 102.50 1 121,040 1 173,170 1 + i'% 8 Coopor Creek channel - 111 1 102.50 1 1,000,000 I 1,1731170 I ► 9 #Ighland park Rood Drainage 1 102.50 1 1111000 1 11604,170 1 ► i 10 Bidevalts Throughout Denton 1 102.50 Iundetereinodl 1,684,110 I ► 11 icutk toenie Brae t 100.00 1 1,5001000 1 3,1849170 1 + 12 IOuth Loop 288 I 100.00 1 25,000,000 1 28,114,870 1 + 13 Will d Paving 1 100.00 1 235,000 1 281419,170 1 e 14 Street Maintenance - Ooentoen 1 500.00 Icontiouing 1 21,419,110 1 1 15 Aunuy 1113311tonskon 1000 Ft. 1 1 99.00 1 23,460 1 21,447,330 1 234,600 e 14 lideealk lApilr I Replace0 Iquire 1 99.00 luodetrdnedl 21,4430330 1 + 17 Myrtle Street - Fsving I Drainage l 99.00 1395-525,000 1 21,443,330 1 ► to Ranch total" Drainage - 415 1 91.75 1 10155,000 1 2905111330 1 ► 11 Match lranch Road obese III t 17.50 I 130,000 1 29,273,330 I + 20 Mitch branch Road phase ty l 97.50 1 21200,000 1 31,191,330 1 + 21 Fire Dept Training Facility 1 96.50 1 210000044 I 3102730330 t 1 { 22 Eagle Drive - 135 to tell eve t 96.50 17,330,004 1 39,148,330 1 1 23 Rod. Intensity Roney Lights Fut. Amoy 1 1 95.00 1 51200 I 39,153,530 1 52,000 1 24 Red. lathe. Llghti Runey Elteatioa 1 1 95.00 k 11400 1 39,1141930 1 140000 1 25 Itlto School Roil 135 to Catlith city I 94.50 1 3,200,000 1 42,354,930 1 1 26 traffic Iignil - New High school 1 94.25 1 10,000 1 42,434,130 1 1 27 Airport Road Rest I 94.00 I 560,000 1 42,994,930 I ► 21 land Acq. North Utility Runely - 13.5 Act 13.75 1 511,060 1 43,10420990 1 t 29 Land Acq. No. 17135 - 24.75 Acree 0191 93.75 1 19175,432 I 44,451,922 I ► 30 inliflPiraknage leproveslnts 0191 93.75 I 709,110 1 45,34,141 1 + 3f Lad Acq. lout% 11135 - 31 Acres 0191 93.75 1 11350,310 1 469711,462 I ► 32 Coputer evokes for Fire Itition 1 93.00 2 204,000 1 461951,42 I ► 4 33 Video King's Roo Mottlaghu to 211 I 92.50 1 114001000 1 41,111,462 1 + 34 11111oeood Paving - bernlyd to bonn.brae 1 92.50 1 1,1001044 1 491911,462 1 + 35 Reconstruction of Itatioo 14 1 91.75 t 750,000 I 50,661,462 I ► E 36 fultry lour Milo RR lnduttriol Oil 1 91.50 1 241,000 1 50,916,462 1 2410000 1 37 1' Fire Mater Main to RR Ind. Tract Oil 1 11.50 1 112,000 1 51,0211462 1 112,000 a 31 NOll w Rood 1 90.50 1 21004,000 1 53,021042 1 a 39 Ector street Drainage - it 1 11.50 I 110,600 1 53,139,062 1 1 44 Corbin NOW Brldga - Ill 1 19.25 1 700,000 1 !30139,062 1 ► 41 file Pathillboslk Lillian Miller I 49.00 I 15,000 1 $3,914,042 1 ► 42 Rehabilititiar of Station 13 1 11.25 1 IS4,400 1 5410649062 l + 43 Rehobllltatim of Itatioo it 1 11.25 1 $000000 I 500,000 t + 44 Toe Cols Allot. - RO.End Utll Aunuy 1 1 17.75 l 5,SIO 1 $051540 1 55,900 1 I I i b { 41 livnllted Strait Participation I 87.71 I 100,000 1 601,590 1 1 46 Hickory Crook Road I 17,00 1 5,500,000 l 6,105,590 I o / 47 Collins Strait - Paving I Drainage t 86.50 1 103,250 1 60601,140 1 a 48 Ryan Road - FN 2111 to FN 1130 1 15.00 I 1,200,000 1 10,101,140 1 1 49 EaponslonlRaiovatlen of Civic PODL 1 14.30 1 11200,000 1 12,0010140 1 50 11glelMorso connection 1 14.00 1 790'),000 1 19,001,140 1 1 51 Crash Fire Name Facilities a 1 13,00 I 23,000 1 19,031,140 l 230,000 a 52 Athletic Mid Devllopaiat 1Don1a park 1 11.25 1 600,000 1 19,431,140 1 a 53 Pork Dev.1 Acquisition, Renovation 1 11.25 1 1,200,000 1 20t131,140 1 I 54 Expand ltrdnal Facilities 0191 80.00 1 2200000 1 21,051,140 1 220,004 / 55 Eatcutivs jetconttr aircraft puking 0191 10.00 1 10,170 1 211062,110 1 180,700 s 56 Tery Mait of Existing Tnolnal Aret a I 79.75 1 191670 I 21,012,380 1 196,700 a 57 Yindsor Orlva - hinkle to bonnts brat 1 79.25 1 660,150 1 21,142,630 1 1 58 Traffic Signal - Loop 218 at King's Roe 1 71.25 1 100,000 l 21,1421630 1 59 Strickland - Drainagt 1 77,00 1 75,000 1 21,911,630 I a 60 North Aircraft Holding Apron e 1 76.25 1 51140 1 21,9231370 l 57,400 o 61 Aircraft Apron 1. of EsLsttag tereinal it 76.25 1 31870 I 21,927,240 k 38,700 a 67 Flo Paving - 160 1 280 0191 76.25 1 71,500 1 2109911140 1 71t500 I 63 Rummy Ili - 35L 1 1 76.00 f 46,900 l 22,045,640 I 469,000 I 64 Aahabilitatloa of Station 12 1 74,75 l 250,000 1 221295,640 1 I 65 lernard It. - Eagle to Hickory 1 13.25 1 1,0001000 1 2312950640 l 1 44 M.Y. Industrial Tract Road 0191 72.50 1 92,100 f 23,381,740 2 92,100 a 61 Parallp) Tasy to Fkt, Rnwy 1711-351. 1 1 72,25 1 21,320 1 23,416tO60 I 213,200 I 61 Taey bet, Present Pussy I Fut. Rnby 1 1 72,21 1 IS,330 1 23,431,390 1 153,300 a 69 Maple - Strait paving one Drainage 1 72,25 1 3951000 1 23,026,390 I 1 j 70 Stub Tsay SE Cerntr to Indust. Area a 1 69.00 1 6t000 I 23,132,340 S 60,000 a 71 Aircraft Parking Apron Mot 1 1 61.75 1 1219"0 1 231961,030 1 112/61400 I 72 Accost Rd Yost Aircraft Pkg Apros 001 61.75 1 46,600 I 24,0070630 1 46,600 a 13 Con.llervice Area Paving e I 68.50 1 12ti00 1 24,019,730 1 121,000 a I hHgnates airport projects which are funded 90110 free FAA grants, i Maslow possible rating + 103,5 k i `r I t ( 1 .J I 1 i f MASTER CIP RANKING SHEET PROJECTS REQUESTED 1985-87 - Rank Prelect Pro}ect CuTmulatlve Title Cost Total Rank order 071,000 77f,0M? {16 f DRAINAGE 14 Cooper Crook Channel - Improvements 4,400,000 4,715,000 102.5 1 ^ TRANBPORTATGOM AND T 16 Four-lane divided road - Spencer' l0 1-35 10,6'25,000 {5,415,000 100.0 5 - ORAI NAOE 15 Ranch Estates 1, 375,CPo0 16,790,000 98.8 6 TRANSPORTATION AND T 3 Heath Branch Road - Hwy. 380 to 1-35 N 5,130,000 21,920,0<0 97.5 7 71,410, 000-91 3 TRANSPORTATION AND T 7 Eagle Drive - Bell Ave. to 1-35 7,000,000 29, 950, 000 96.5 9 AIRPORT 6 Mat; /sower extension 2,000,000 31,350,000 94.0 II 11 36 600.000 9519 all ~A ` AIMONT FM FUNDS 2 Infield drainage improvements 100,000 31,700,000 93.8 13 DRA INAGE 5 Old North Road - Nottingham 352,000 32,252,000 93.0 15 TRANSPORTATION AND T L Controller upgrades - Noun intersections 60,000 32,312,000 92.5 16 E i TRANBPOIITAIION AND T 10 Blke lane - widen Willowood to Gorman El I, 7W,ou0 34,012,000 92.5 17 iRANSPORTA110N AND T 13 install slgnals - Ave. D 1-35E accesses 100,000 34,112,000 92.5 1B ` AIRPORT 8 Reroute Underwood Road 50,000 34,162,000 90.5 19 DRAINAGE I Tin Ector to Malone 6 Cordell System 105,330 34,267,330 89.5 20 IRA SPORTATION AND T 17 Corbin bridge 665,900 34,933,130 89.3 21 DRAINAGE 12 Myrtle Street Drainage 160,000 35,093,130 85.8 22 ! DRAINAGE S Cott btroot 169,200 35,262,330 95.8 23 DRAINAGE It Hollyhill7Longridge Drainage 500,000 35,767,330 65.0 24 6e, 0" 95, gig, slop 95. 5 2T-- AIRPORT FAA f1JND6 1 Aircraft parking extension 800,000 36,122,330 85.5 26 j AIRPORT I Exec term. road/parking /furnishings 350,000 36,472,330 83.5 27 L DMINAOE 13 Highland Park,l-35-400' No. of Willowwoe 490,000 36,67'2,330 03.0 28 PARKS AM OWCASAIION t 50 met; pool 1,750,000 38,622,330 82.0 29 one W600,6100 ;ft enrik" 09 ~ aw TRANSPORTATION AND T I Windsor Drive - Hinkle to Bonnie brae 6Y5 ,0W 39,450,330 79.3 31 i DRAINAGE 6 Archer Trail - Emerson 21,700 39,472,030 78.3 32 DRA IMAN 10 McKinney St., channel 1200' downstream '20u,OW 39,672,030 78.3 33 DRAINAGE 7 Duncan - Shady Oaks 300,000 39,912,030 78.3 34 1 I tAANSPDATATIUN AND 1 21 Highland from Ave. C to Watch V51,00u 40,223,030 73.5 35 fRANBPORTAISON AND 1 18 Reconstruct Mop$& - Ave. D must to Welch 375,000 40,596,030 72.3 36, AIRPORT It feralnal extension 3W, 000 40. M,030 71.0 37 I t PARKS AND RECREATION 2 Athletic field dev 700,000 41,590,030 70.0 38 FIRE I Combine stations 1 6 3 ,1,000,000 42,598,030 70.0 39 DRAINAGE 3 Strickland drainage 71,000 42,669,030 69.8 40 OMINASE 2 Dorman school drainage 93,000 42,762,030 69.8 41 AIRPORT 7 Road Improvement - west side 137,000 43,099,030 "IS 43 A1fd'OR1 2 AIC control tower 50,000 43,149,030 65.5 44 { LIBRARY I Branch libraries 375,000 43,524,030 67.0 45 AIRPORT 3 Crash,4lre,roocue vehicle/building 2x50,000 43,774,030 66.0 46 AIRPORT 9 Airfraighk terminal 500,000 44,274,030 64.0 4? I` i I I ,f i l r I N 1 1 1 f.xw1 I' tRANSPORfAIJON AM 1 e2 Mulberry from Ave. D to Ave. U 157,500 44.431,530 63.0 48 J FIRE 3 lrsining complex 3, O(q, O(K7 47,431,530 6:.a 49 rRANSPORI A I I ON AND 1 23 Sycamore from Ave. D to Ave. C 116,hK1 41,548,230 6Y.fi 5u !i INM78PORIA110N AND 1 t9 Pwing - Johnson and Smith streets [50,O(K1 47,798,230 63.5 51 DNAINAOC 9 Acme Brick entry, street L drainaqu lepr 15),(K K) 47,948,230 bt.3 5:1 11 111 TRAlt tAIION AND 1 20 Ave. A from Prairie to Chestnut 52,5(K) 48,000,730 60.0 53 I. 1RANVOR 1 AI ION AND t 10 Add lane to Ave D, Wilshire 8 to 1-3!6 15,(Kx) 48,ui5, 7;O 59.8 54 II AINPOR'1 10 8o. and emery. road crash bridge 200,"" 4G,k15,73u 57,0 55 AIRPORT FAA FUNDS 6 Land acquisition extension runway (KK) 48,235,730 56.0 56 AIRPORT S Maintenance building 150, (KO 48,385,730 52.5 57 AIRPORT 4 Airport equipment and vehicle 10,(K10 481425,730 51.5 W AIAPORI FAA FUNDS 7 Extend runway 17 15u,(KKj 48,575,730 47.5 59 LIBRARY 3 Develop store-front libraries 51.0,(KK, 48,6e5,73u 46.0 60 1 TRANGPQA1A1IDN AND T 14 install ■ignage syst.,FW Dr/C'arro,l BJvd 48,625,7.W 45.0 61 AIRPDAI 13 Curb/gutter Improvements - SL crx nsr e(KO,(Kri) 48,825,730 31.5 62 AIRPORT 12 Underground electric - 5t corner Iui1,wo 48,9e5,730 31.5 63 i 1 RAN6141h I A I I ON AND 1 S Extend Ave. E So. L E. - loin Ave. D 138,W4 49,064,234 23.0 64 ` IPANBPDATAIION AND T 11 Sec. Artsrlsls - Bernardo Mulberry, We•c 1,660,000 50,724,234 B.u 65 f ~ ! IAANBPOR I A I ION AND 1 9 Improve/widen Wilshire Of - Ave U to C 136,350 50,860,584 6.0 66 PAAVS AND RECREAI10N 4 Lighting at Denton high school 150,0(K) 51,010,564 0.0 67 t 1RANWoRIATION AND T 12 Neconstruct Maple pay. L curb, Ave wwsl 315,000 51,385,584 0.0 68 9{I PAip:B AND RECREATION School dlat/city indoor pool-lutr school 1,500,000 52,885,584 0.0 69 i oRANo rurAL 52'095'504 I i r I ' , ' i r~ i f ~ I ,wsst . i~ i v i 1 } III 1 jj 1 a f jai." I i 1 i .r . I j" I h r I 'S r I ^.r +ai M I N U T E S i PLANNING AND ZONING COMISSION J ~ r 7 1 r~ ~s:/~ I .5 ~ i t!! i sMRl~t I u c~ X r{ i . II r, r ! j ~ i + i. 'i~ 'RAFT Ml nu Les Planning and Zoning Commisslon May lb, 1968 A special called meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Llty of Lenton, lexas was held on kednesday, ka lb, 19bb, At 5:00 p.r., in the COUnlil Chamber of the Municipal building. Present: Lill Claiborne, Euline Brock, kuby Cole, lean Glasscock, Judd Holt, and killiaw kamman Absent: rths kiker Present from Staff: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning 1i wnd Levelopprent; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Bob Nelson, Kxecutlve Director for Utilities; David Ellison, Assistant 4[ to the Lity Manager; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; ! Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Ernie Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities; Steve brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation; John Cook, Fire Chief; Lea Allison, Senior Civil Engineer; Lloyd McLendon, Utilities budget Rate Administra• tor; and Donna Baker, Secretary Chairman bill Claiborne called the meeting to order. } 1. MINUTES: It was coved by Ms. 6tock, seconded by Mr. 4lasscock, and unanimously urrlca (h•Oj to approve the minutes of the special called meeting of April 20, 1986. 11 . CONSILER sAkING A RECOMMENDAIION ON THE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL Mr. Claiborne said that the Commission would address the non-utility Items first, followed by the utility Items. NON-UTILITY. Mr. Robbins said that at the last ton-utility CIP meet a Commissioners agreed to amend the 1491.92 CIP and In- ` clude the airport improvements. Since that meeting, they have received a letter to Arena the drainage section as well, for the 1991.92 year. This would decrease the Cooper Creek Drainage Phase 11 from 61,400,000 to 6TS4,U00. This would allow 6ZSO,u40 to to to Pecan Creek Drainage. Mr. Holt asked what the purpose for adding Pecan Creek was. Mr. Clark said that at a neighborhood meeting, there were several complaints regatd!n9 pecan Creek flowing Into ppeoples backyards. this included the ateas from Bradshaw and Ruddell. Mr. Holt asked what the cost would do to the other areas that would to lacking the financial help. Mr. Clark said that staff Is requestln one million dollars for this year and next year to cover the other areas, including the money taken from Cooper Creek Lrsi"age. Mr. Robbins said that staff recommended approval for the 1991.92 CIP with the amendments. Mr. Robbins said that he wanted to then address the 1992.93 year, He said that at the last meeting, the Commissioners discussed allocating a majority of the funds to the Parks and Recreation department [or the renovation of the pool. Mr. '+ol+ said that he had a report on the conversation with the school district, He sold that he had talked with David Graham, Principal for Denton High School, and found that the school is In need of the City's help. The school would not be able to even build a pool without the City's help, Mr. Graham had silo that it funded, the school would requlre the students to attend a swirming program designed to teach all how to swim. Ile also added that, if funded, the school woula open the pool early in the rornin and keep it open later at night Eor those cltitens who would like to use it. 1 r4 l5i Finutes Fay lb, lbbb loge 2 Fr. Claiborne asked If the school would be contributing to the cost. Fir. Holt said that Fir. Grahan could not state how awch the school wad willing to contribute, but with the SSOO,000 they would be able tj build a pool. fir, Robbins stated that there was one other issue with the J 1992.93 year that has been causing r1 or concern. Ibis Is the Alexander Street area drainage. Kr. obbitis stated that the Issue was raised that Alexander Street may need to be dent earlier than proposed. Additionallyy, the City Council has re- quested that the CDEG Committee tev%w its recommendation and possibly amend it and do Alexander Sttoet earlier. This area would be funded by future bona and, if smendea, it could be covered with CLBG funds. It currently remains to the 1992.93 y-sr and staff recomcenda that it stay there until the City Council and CDEG Committed decide the best possible way for it funding. l,r. Clark showed the location of Alexander Street on the map. He sold that the basin currently does not have a storm sewer system. The area needs a storm sewer system with it 36" out- fall. This would include five additional inlets. The CIP has an estls.ate of $128,000 thouf,h this includes the cost of ' Intl ation. If constructed at this time it would cost about $60 000, not including engineering. He said that one alter- I native would be to put in earth tlumes at ■ cost of ;10,060. Another alternative would be to put in a critical portion of the store sewer system for $SS-6U,000. Fir. Clark said that only partial completion would not solve all the problems. He recom- manded that it should be done right with the initial Install- ation. Hr. Brinkman stated that he would like to add to Mr. Holt's corments made earlier, he said that he had met with the school staff to find out the total cost of what the pool would be. The total cost of the project would run $1,200,000 with having Wo OOO of their own funds. The school would definitely need the help of the city to make the pool a possibilit;. He said that they are looking at the possibility of getting some } state fundin for tl.e pool. This would be funded by the Texas 1 Parks and hi dlife Commission through tte Local Pool Fund to assist in the funding of the facility. Mr. Brinkman said that the architect is currently makingQ some changes and would then fresent it to the state for iunding, staff and the City will be planning a trip to Irving to view as indoorloutdoor pool with a removable bubble. This could be an idea that the City may want to consider for the new pool project. Mr. Erinkmnn said that the trip was planned for key 11th and he would come back to Planning and ZoningQ Cam- mission at a loser date to discuss the Information goined frot. the trip. Mr. Ellison stated that executive staff recommended a roval with the Alexander Street drainage and pool, If the City Council chose to reallocate the CLBG funds Alexander Street would ust be taken from the CIP. Fr. Ellison said that they would itke to have some kind of commitment in the plan to gave some type of community pool. Sls. Brock asked If there was a way tf moving Alexander Street dralnaye forward. Mr. Ellison sold that the only way possible would be through operating budget, COO funds, or if moved to I9S1-92. I Fr. Claiborne said that technically, it could go with the 1968.119 funds if there were additfouat operating funds. Mr. Flllson said that was correct though the bond funds have already been committed through 1990.91, i 4 i 1 V P62 ALinutes k.+y lb, 19bb j Page 3 Mr. Claiborne asked Mr. Brinkman what the average cost for a I ublfc pool at North Lakes park would be with no additional buildings. Mr. Brinkman said that it would depend on numerous things. for an average sire pool with no land involved and no facilities Installed, it would run around $1,000,000, for a larger pool it would run around 1 3/4 million dollars. Mr. Claiborne asked A,r. Brinkman it it would be beneficial to the community to take some of the funds from the pool renovation and from land acquisition and use the funds for construction of j another pool in atother area. Mr, Brinkman sold yes, it the fools would be decentralized, lhls would serve the people in other areas. He suggested that they might want to have small (25 meter) pools in various areas or have two large (50 meter) pools in two different areas of town. He said the service and maintenance would be greater with various small pools as opposed to two Larger ones. Mr. Claiborne asked what the size of a 2S yard pool would be. Mr, Brinkman said that it would be )S' x 601. He added that it would be halt the size of the pool currently at the Civic Center. Joho Cooper, ILL E. McKinney Street Suite 2U8, asked how much It would be per square foot construction. Au. Brinkman said that with asmaller ool facilities you would have the same duplication in building you would with a larger one. The cost would not be that much different. Mr. Claiborne asked Mr. Clark if there was some justification for waiting with Masch Branch Road, those 111. Mr. Clark said that It depended on how quickly the Commission wanted to set up the transportation facilities near the Airport. The quicker the road Is done, the faster the Airport can develop. Mr. Clark added that a problem could orlse from waiting. Mr. Claiborne said that he wanted to see Ausch Branch Road, Phase III done but felt that there were other important needs that needed to be met around the city. He said that he felt they should make an amendment to staff's proposal later. Mr. Claiborne said that after review of executive staff's recommendation, he felt that $250,000 should be dedicated to construction/reconstruction of streets each yyear. Ms. Brock asked how for the amount would go. Mr. Cis iborne said it would o about 114 mile. Mr. Clark said that it would go farther if tt were on overlay lnstead of total reconstruction. Mr. Claiborne moved to approve the executive Staff's Focus- mendations with the ad ditfon that $250,000 be allocated to construction/reconstruction of city streets for 1992.93. Seconded by Mr. Glasscock. Mr. Holt said that he had no problem with allowing the funds to go to street construction/reconstruction, but felt that some funding should also go to the pool for D.I.S.D. He said that it would benefit the city in all areas. He added that he would have to vote against the proposal because of it. Mr. Claiborne asked Mr. Holt if he would consider on amend- rent to reduce the renovation of the city pool from 51,200,000 to $1,000,000 and land acquisition from $600,000 to gSUC,000, 'this would allow $S00,000 to to to for the funding of the pool, Mr. Holt said yes. {M Mr. Claiborne sold that 51.50 per square foot for land scqui- sltion was too high. Mr, kamman ssld that he agreed that $800,000 for lU acres of property was on exorbitant price. .i P82 Minutes Mey 18, 1968 Page 4 Mr. Holt moved to amend the original motion and take $200,000 from the renovation and $3C0,000 from land acquisition and allow the $900,000 to go to D.I.S.C. for the pool funding. Seconded by Ns. Cole, and unanimously carried (6.0). Mr. Claiborne called for a vole on his original motion to approve the executive staff's recommendation with the addition of .$250,000 to be allocated to constructlort/reconstruction of city streets for 1992.93. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). Hr. Claiborne moved to accept staff's recommendation to change the drainage portion of 1991.92 CIP, reducing Cooper Creek Channel to $150,000 and adding the Pecan Creek improvements tot $250,000. Seconded by Fu. Cole and unanimously carried (6-0). It was moved by Mr. Claiborne, seconded by Ms. Cole and unanimously carried (6-0) to recoo.mend adoption of the five year plan as follows: 1986-89 program year - no change. 1989.90 program year - no change. 1990.91 program year • no change. 1991-92 program year - as amended: Streets and Transportation use rant oa ase 380 to Jim Christa1 $ S73,12S Pasch Branch Road/Phase 11 Jlm Christal to FMISIS 1,504,931 Local Participation/Four Lane Divided Road • Spencer to 1.35 1,100,000 Intersection Control Signals 22S,u00 hillowwood Bike Path 100,00u Turn Lanes for Arterials 90,u00 Pedestrian Signals 30 000 D r e~t n eke $7 -16TSTM ooC per-Creek Channel 5 750,000 kingfisher Crelnage 75,000 Pecan Creek Drainage Bradshaw to Ruddell 250 000 Fire and Emer enc Services coon er a ev ce $ 500,006 Outdoor Emergency Sirens 271 A~lr~ort Im rovements dR a3~lcce61 to out: flangar Area $100,000 Infield Drainage Improvement 70,916 Land Acquisition Korth 17/35, 24.7 Acres 107,593 Land Acquisition, 13.5 Acres S6,805 Land Acquisition, 31 Acres 135,036 North folding Apron 5,740 Runway Extension 1,000' 23,460 M.3.R.1. Runway Extension Lighting 1,400 Parallel Taxiway Extension Holdini Apron 1,000' 15,800 Stud Taxiway to S.E. Industrial Area 6,000 Commercial Service Area Paving 12,100 F.B.O. Paving 71,500 Est uttve Jet Center Aircraft Parking 16,070 Engineering and Contingency 1 $ u Library Bookmobile 250000 1991-1992 PROGRAM YEAR TOTAL :6,514,306 1492.92 program year: Streets and Transportation Men rant oa , ase l[ FM ISIS to Springside Road $ 630 000 Street Construction/Reconsttuctton 250,000 Westwood Paving 235,000 Intersection Control Signals 235,060 Partial Improvements to Clty Sidewalk System 106,000 Cversired Participation in lhoroughfires Iuo,uu0 Turn Lanes ""o 'JT'B, 3s,U0'G i I I~ PEZ Minutes May Is. 1986 Page 5 i t i Drainage outer Creek Drainage, Phase It t1,LOO,000 Alexander Street Area Drainage 128,600 Oak Street and Avenue E Drainage "N" U Parks and Recreation Civic enter ou xpansion/Renovation $1,000,000 City/DISD Joint Swimming Facility at H.S. SCO,000 Lana Acquisition for Community Park 500,000 Neighborhood Park Development 300 000 Fire Ce artment and rmergency Services AeFa 31 rate tat on Y c nney treat S S00'Ou0 Rebuild Station 44 (Kings Row) 15000.0 Jt,[~u,uuu 1992-1993 PROGRAM YEAR TOTAL $6,623,000 UTILITY, Mr. Nelson said that each year the Public utilities B aIs and gives Its recommendation for the year. The CiP need is based on the general population growth for a five year time, at 3 ercent. The total cost for the CIP is $83,000,000 with $2S 000,000 for electric, $29,000,000 for water, and $19,000,tS00 for sewer. Mr. Nelson said that the total funding of $51,600,000 will come f from fonds and $16,600,000 will come from current revenues with the remaining $0,000,000 from other sourcei. He said that staff anticipates, over the next five years, i $S1,OOD,OCO worth of bona sells for the three utilities. In order to tund the capital improvements and increased operating costs, staff is looking at a rate increase in water for the year 1969 at 8.5 percent. The electric rates are stable at this time i though in 1993 there could be an increased rate of 25 percent. lie stated that they are proposing to the Public Utilities Board a 5 percent rate refund for customers in September. Mr. Nelson said that they anticipate a 10 percent rate Increase in sewer for 1990, a 9 or 10 percent increase in 1991, a 6 per- cent increase in 1992, and s S percent increase in 1993. These numbers reflect the construction that is going to be needed at the Water/Wastewater Treatment plant. He said that the major projects ■re the Ray Poberts water plant and an upgrade In the existing plant in 1991.92, tie said that most of the major projects include normal maintenance and up- grades of existing equipment to better serve the customers. Mr. Nelson said that one of the projects consists of a controller that would be put on the customer's air conditionin unit to control the temperatute. the controller would allow Re main switchboard to remotely shut off the air conditioner for 7 1/2 minutes during peak loads. This would to the customer $10.00 per month for the service ■nd would De an efficiency unit as well. This would not change the customer's house more than 3 or 4 degrees and will then kick back on. He added that custo- mers would be able to take it off and control their own temper- stures at night, Mr. Nelson said that he wanted to point out to the Commission "Overhead to Undertr~und Conversion". He said that they would tf like to allocate $300,000 per year to put exiseIng IInea that are working well undergyround. This would help towards the j efforts of beautificetton for the community. b°' I -i Mr. Claiborne asked what "Underground Extension 6 lmproverents (25 miles rain feeder)" meant, lie wanted to know If it was a new line that does not currently exist. Mr, Nelson said that it is the process of putting In conductors to new subdivisions and new developments, i i4 r P6Z Minutes May 18, 1968 Page a i Mr. Nelson said that "Overhead to Underground Conversion, (2.3 t cities)" meant that they already have an overhead system, and want to allocate $300,000 per year to putting it underground, for beautlticatlon. Mr. Holt asked Mr. Nelson where they determine to place the lines underground. Mr. Nelson said that they did not yet know, br. Holt asked what the "Overhead Extension 6 Improvements (25 miles main feeder)" were. Mr. Nelson said that they are the normal lines that come out of the substations. Mr. Nelson stated that with water the major cost is the water plant, at $15,500,000. This would include half for the water plant and half in the pipes needed. Mr. Nelson stated that the next major project is the wastewater treatment plant expansion. He said that this was greatly needed. Mr. Nelson added that included in the CIP was the Installation and replacement of water and sewer lines. He said that the de- partment would be working with En Entering to locate streets that would be repaired. At the time of repair, they would replace existlrig lines if in poor shape. S He said that another major project is called "Cevelop Guide ' Sewer Lines". This would be an tttempt to be responsive to growth and to extend where there is currently no service. This would be in the amount of $250,000 a year for each water and sewer. j br. Claiborne said that he had ■ question regarding Lake Lcwlsville and Rmy Roberts Hydro Electric which was on the CIP. He asked If the electric generated at the hydro electric plant at Ray Roberts and Lake Lewisville would do anything besides supply power for the wastewater plants. Mr. Nelson said no and that they would not be used to supply electricity to the customers. Mr. Nelson showed on the maps the areas that did not have service and what it would cost to establish service for that area. He also stated how many residents lived in each area. j Mr. Nelson stated that there were not too many people throughout the city that did not have service. Those who did not also have the option to tie onto on existing line. Ms. Brock asked how much it would be to tie onto an existing line, Mr. Nelson said that they pay by pro rate as to how much line would be needed. Mr. Nelson said that the Public Utilities Board recommended approval of the CIP. Mr. Holt asked what areas are in need of water and sewer set- vice. Mr. Nelson sold that there are two or three areas, In- cluding the Gambles area, He sold that there was going to be little development in the area by the Gambles since part of the property was owned by the City and the other part by a neighbor who had no intention of developing on the property In the near future. - i Mr. Holt asked what It would cost to put In the water lines for the Bonnie Brae stem. Mr. Allison said it would be =102,000 for a 16" line on the westside of the street or =96,600 for a 12" line on the eastside of the street, though it would only take one line to supply water to the Gamble's residence. i P62 Minutes May 14, 1y88 Fage 7 Ms. Brock asked how the new fire station would be supplied I water. Mr. Nelson said that they had extended the water and jk sewer line on klndsor Drive years ago and would be able to tie onto that line. Ms. Brock asked If they would be dependent on a Bonnie Brae water line. Mr. Nelson said that the line extending to the fire station is an 8" line and would not give the necessary water pressure. This would be resolved by putting a sprinkler system In the fire station. Mr. Robbins provided information on the utility CIP process and the costs involved with construction of new utilities. Mr. Robbins stated that staff recommended approval of the utility portion of the CIP with no amendments. Mr. Claiborne said that he wanted to commend the Planning staff and the Utility staff for working together and being able to make the charts and naps and bring them back to the Commission. Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of the utility CIP for 1S4S-93 with no amendments. Seconded by Dr. Glasscock. Norma Gamble, 2201 N. Bonnie Brae, asked why the Commission had not asked for any questions or comments from the audience. Mr. Claiborne said that this was not a public hearing, It is a consideration time for the Commission and they did not have to follow the public hearing procedure. 3 Mr. Claiborne asked the Commission if the rules should be sus- pended and ask for public input. The Commission sold yes. Ms. Gamble said thst she was opposed to the rating system and t wanted to know what was happening with their request for utility lines. Mr. Claiborne said that reYardini her proposal to have a water line down Bonnie Brae, he felt I at the only way to compare the ' E demand for that project versus other projects, was by sore type of rating system to show the demand. He told Ms. Gamble that she has the oppportunity to state her side in three different rocessesr I) Public Utilities board, 2) Planning and Zoning Commission, and 3) City Council. He stressed that there us$ no other way for the Commission and other boards to know what priority projects are needed without the rating system, Ms. Gamble stated that she has gone through the three stop process before and does not Eeel that she is being listened to. Mr. Holt asked it the Commission was saying "no" to the Gambles by a proving the utility CIP. Mr. Robbins said that by ap• proving the utilities portion of the CIP, the Commission was not saying "yes" or "no" to the Gambles. Mr. Gamble said that he also had some mixed feelings about the rating system. He added that at the tlne that he had checked into the cost for the water line, he found that it would be $100,000 and did not feel that anyone was looking at their situation. Mr. Claiborne stated that he did not know how nany j man hours It took to make the naps but that the Gambles are what prompted him to want to ace one. He wanted to see the other areas as well that were not receiving service. Mr. Claiborne read from the nap that the cost for 3,200 feet of i, 14" water line on the westside of Bonnie brae, from Highway 380 to Windsor, was $102,100. Mr. and Ms. Csmble both stated that that was not the amount given to them when it was discussed with the purchasing department, I ~i B PU Minutes May 18, 1988 Page 8 Mr. Allison stated that they received the bid price. All bids are priced by each unit individually, When the department estimates the cost, they also include insurance, surveyors, contractors, and built in contingencies. Mr. Allison added that they did bid for an e" line at $15.00 per foot. Ms. Gamble asked why they would repair the streets when they would need to be torn back up again to install the lines. Mr. Allison said they would not tear up the road, Instead they would put the lines on the sides of the streets. Chairman Claiborne asked for a vote on the motion to approve the utilities Portion of the C1P, motion carried (b-0). i ' I % . i i ti 1 i i `'.k4. { } Y,y P I Z Minutes April 27, 1986 Page 7 Ms. Evans said that this ordinance would allow the City Manager to negotiate disposition of property that cannot be separately developed. The Development Review Committee recommended the disposition of the pproperty on Nilson 1 Street in exchange for property on Lakey Street. DEC15ION: Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of the epos tion of property on Nilson Street. Seconded by Mr. Killeen and unanimously carried (7-0). D. b-46. Request for property disposition at Noodrew Lane. STAFF REPORT: Mr, Clark said that the City of Denton had exceaa roperty south of T. Gerald Snider, Jr.'a property on Noodprov Lane. He said that as part of the Noodrow Lane street widening project, a portion of property to needed from Mr. Snider. The City's property is 2907.1 square feet and Mr. Snider's property Is 2905.66 square feet. i~ Ms. Evans sold that the Development Review Committee and the Public Utilities Board recommended approval of the property exchange. f~ DECISION: Ms. Brock moved to recommend approval of the ; k sif pf osTifon of property at Noodrow Lane. Seconded by f` Ms. Biker and unanimously carried (7•U). IV. DIRECTOR'S REPORT. Mr. Robbins discussed the upcoming agendas with the Commission The upcoming agendas were agreed upon as follows: j May It Regular Meeting Public Hearing and Consideration- Landscape/Tree Preservation Ordinance May 18 ;especial Meeting CIP Recommendation May 2S ;,Regular Meeting Likeout Surmount Public Hearings June Ol - Special Meetiag Public Hearing and Consideration • Denton Development Plan June 01 - Regular heating Mr. Robbins said City Council has requested that a umber of the Planning and Zoning Commission be appointed to the blue Ribbon Committee for Solid Nute. r Mr, Claiborne nominated Mr. Glasscock for the committee. Mr. Glasscock agreed to serve. All Commissioners concurred, Meeting adjourned to the 'Civil Defense Room at 6t8S p.m, V, ADJOURN 10 A WORK SESSION IN TMb CIVIL DEFENSE ROOM 10 DISCUSS , Mr, Robbins gave a recay o! what had happened at the Joint PUB/P8Z and the April 20, 1981 acting of the Commission. Mr, Robbins said that the executive staff has reviewed the projects and has made a recommendation to the Commission on the non-utility projects, f i f P i z Minutes April 21, 1968 Page 8 i He said that the Public Utilities Board would be meeting on May i, 1988 and will make their final recommendations. These will be presented to the Planning and toning Commission at the special meeting on May 18, 1988. Mr. Robbins said that, at this time, they could go over non-utility items in more detail. Me. Riker asked if the Commission could add additional projects or delete some of them. Mr. Robbins said yea. Mr. Robbins said that the totals came from the rating form. Executive staff saw some flaws In tha way that it was pre- pared. Each department director ranked tbeir own projects { differently. He said that each Commission member could rank {I each project, and see what they received for priorities. He continued that executive staff felt that each main project that requested CIP funds, needed some help. He said that the executive staff wanted to keep the level of spending for 1992-93 about the same as last year's 6.5 million dollars. Me. Robbins said that the Commission was working only on the 1992-93 CIP except for the airport which would be explained later. Mr. Robbins stated that executive staff would like to not have A tax increase. He said that the projects were all general, revenue, or bond funded. Mr. Robbins said that the executive staff found that the costs of all CIA projects were over the 6.S million dollar range. They then asked each department director to make a new list, only shorter. The shorter list received was ..ill more than 6,5 million dollars. The executive staff then shortened the wha projectsnwouldhbenefitethe Citytthedmost.liThisaincluded allt departments submitted. He said each department would get funding to some extant. ; Mr, Robbins said that the department that would get the most funding was Parks and Recreation, executive staff felt that it was appropriate since they had not received funding in the 1991.92 year. Mr, Robbins told Chairman Claiborne that there would be a recommendation from the Airport Manager for an amendment to the 1991-93 CIP. He said that Mr, Thompson would explain why 4 the Airport was not oft the 1992-93 project list and why he was amending the 1991-92 year. Mr. Thompson said that they would not be asking for more but iteme re three items to thatewere h on lthe 1991d-92 year. saThesea _watt airport lighting, runway/tasiway extensions and utility runway/taxiway. With 90/10 moneys the total came to $762,500. He said that without the 90/10 money, it put the thtet items at a ridiculous cost. + Mr. Robbins asked if Mr. Thompson would explain what 90/10 meant, Mr. Thompson said that the FAA will fund 90 percent of any pra pptoved projects and that the City would match it with 10 percent. Mr. Thompson said that the department came up with 13 items that had to be done to keep the Airport in good condition. Mr. Thompson aid that with FAA funding from the 90/10 moneys the city would only spend 626,123. This would be the cost Isom the total amount of ;,620,732. k `11 I~ P a t Minutes r April 27, 1968 r Page 9 Mr. Thompson said that the Airport's 13 projects werei 1) Road Accessibility - Developing 80 acres of property on the southeast corner. Mr. Thompson said that they would like to finish the road and lease tht land. He said that they already have corp- orations interested in the land. 21 infield drainage improvement. Mr. Thompson said that the drainage for the Airport was put in in 1940. This has been rusting and has started to cave in. He said that a certain area has caved in and the water is running off the top of the ground. Mr. Thompson said that, if hit by a heavy plane, it could cause the earth to fall in. Mr. Thompson said they would like to replace the drainage system, 31 Land Acquisition - 24.7 acres on the northend of the runway. { Mr. Thompson amid that he would like to get the land purchased for clear toning. 41 Land Acquisition - 13.5 acres on the cornet, which the Airport will need for a future 40000 foot parallel runway, 5) Land Acquisition - 31 acres on the Southend of the runway for clear toning as will. Mr, Thompson said that in a conversation with Bill Holt, Economic Development Director for the Chamber of Commerce, he discovered that the property Will eventually be selling for $1.00-2,00 per square foot, He said that it would be about $86,000-87,000 per acts whereas right now it can be purchased for $10,000 per mere, 6) future Bolding Apron - This would be on the northend of the taxiway, 7) 1,000 foot extension of southend of the runway, S) Runway lighting for 1,000 foot extension, 5) Extending taxiway and holding apron 1,000 feet. 10) Stud teiwmy to the southeast industrial area. 111 Commercial service area paving - To add parking for jets and aircraft. 12) 1.1,0. Paving - future 1,8.0, site, This would do the paving with only city funds. 1)) Executive Jet Center for Aircraft Parking, Mr, Thompson said that this would be for businesses that + want to leave their aircraft or jets for the day or over- night, This would included corporations like Peterbilt, Texas Instruments, ate, Mr, Claiborne eked if Mt, Thompson would go over item 11 again. His Thompson said that the City owns property that some corporations would like to Leer, but since there is not a road, they do not wish to lease it, Mr. Clerk said that the plant have already been designed, but City has not recmived funds to continue, 'i 1 a 1 I r I N r P a a Minutes April 27, 1988 ! Page 10 Mr. Claiborne asked it the City could go with revenue bonds. Mr. Clark said that he did not know. Mt. Robbins said that without a guaranteed return, it would be difficult to sell. Mo. Kiker asked where funds are applied from leasing the j property. Mr. Thompson said the funds would go into the Airport operations fund. 1 Mr. Thompson said that one of the leases is currently bring- ing in $81,000 and the money covets the cost of three em- ployees and maintalnance. Mr. Glasscock asked when the airport funding was needed. Nt. Thompson said they need it now, though it was in the 1991-92 CIP year. He said that they could not get FAA funds approved for 1988, but staff does think they might be approved for funds in 1989. Mr. Thompson said that it will probably be 1990-91 before they receive FAA funding. Mr. Thompson said that the FAA has a five year plan that they ? are authorized to allocate 1.6 billion dollars by 1992. He said that the airport department is trying to get I million E i dollars by 1992. K' Mr. Glasscock asked it that was the quickest way they could j get the money. Mr, Thompson said yes. He said that was the reason they didn't ask for money this year. He said that next year, it approved by FAA, he would come back and make his re- quests. Mr, Kamman asked if he had understood that the airport has already been approved for $162,500 for CIP 1991-92 year and that they just want to revise the projects that the money would go for. Mr. Thompson said yes. Mr. Claiborne moved to recommend approval tot the substitution of the 12 items in the 1991-92 CIP. Seconded by Mr. Kamman and unanimously carried (7-0). Mr. Claiborne asked Me. Brinkman where he had proposed the land acquisition for the park. Mr. Brinkman said either in the northeast or southeast section of Denton. Mr. Kamman asked Mrs Brinkman if he wanted just 10 acres. He said that in the request it stated "Acquire one-halt of northeast or southeast Community parks (lo acresla, in the amount of +600,000, Mr. Xamman asked if Mr. Brinkman planned to spend $1000000 for 10 octal. Mr. Brinlw n said that most of the parka are 20 acres in size. He said that the land would not be purchased until 1992 or 1991. The land would have the utilities and the thoroughfare in by than, Mr. Brinkman said that it would be $1,00.2.00 per equate foot. Originally this would be 10 acres and then 20 acres later on, Ms, Stock asked it there was a piece of land already chosen. Mr. Brinkman said no. Mr, Holt said that he bad toad the latter from Gilbert Bernstein The letter stated that if the City agreod to the new pool at the future high nchool, the City could make panpants of $100#000 each year for five ysarss He said that Re understood that if the City would join in on the coat, the facility would be much larger and could be geed jointly by the City and the school district. P a 1 Minutes April 27, 1988 Page 11 Mr. Holt amid that with a large pool, it could be used for swim meets that would bring a lot of people to the city. He said that these people would also be spending money to stay over- night , buy gas, and to eat in the city. Mr. Holt concluded I` that he felt the City would really be passing up an opportunity if they did not approve of it. Ms. Kiker agreed with Mr. Holt. Mr. Glasscock agreed. He said that he was ashamed that with a city the sire of Denton, that parents would have to send their children to Lewisville to swim. Mr. Claiborne said that he did not fully understand every- thing. Mr. Holt said that D.I.S.D. wanted 500,000 from the i City to use the pool and to build a larger facility. D.I.S.D. has agreed to have the city pay !1000000 annually. Mr. Claiborne asked why the Commission recommended $1,000,000 last year. Mr. Brinkman said that Perks and Recreation was recommending an indoor/outdoor facility last year. This year they are requesting just an outdoor pool. Me. Kamman asked it the pool would be any better. Mr. Holt said thet his understanding was that it would enable them to F build a better facility. Mr. Claiborne asked it Mr. Holt and Mr. Glasscock would find out the details associated with the pool and the school dis- trict. Mr. Holt said that they would also find out where exactly the $500,000 would be going. Ms. Brock said that it could possibly and the city to come togethorto discusst mathe jor rissues dinvolved with the school and street construction. Mr. Claiborne said that the Commission should look at one topic at a time and can make a recommendation, though it was not mandatory at this time. STREETS a TRIIPPIC. Mr. Claiborne asked Me. Clark what Phase f, il, and III of Masch Branch Road _Involved. Mr. Clark showed on PhasesIItwes JimsChristalitoeP.M 151S,aindllhass 2IICWasst M. 1515 to Springside Road. Mr. Clark said that Phase III was the most expensive because of the bridge. Mr. Claiborne asked it the map was showing an interchange at Corbin Road or it it was an exiPting underpass. Mr. Clark said that it showed the location of low water crossing. Me, Claiborne asked it Mr. Clark had a list of where the intersection control signals would be placed or if they would be at random. Mr. Clark said that they would be the same ones as last year including Morse Street at Loop 211, McKinney street at Mockingbird, and Loop 211 at Texas Instruments, Ms. Kiker said that sbe felt that anything on Bonnie Bras would be helpful. Mr. Claiborne said that 1998-19 was for the reconstruction of Bonnie Brae, Mr. Clark added that the request was already in froa Scripture to Riney Road. Mr. Claiborne said that he was in favor of Mooch Branch Road Phases I and 11. He said thatr at this time, he had some reservations about Phase III. t P i I Minutia April 27, 1909 Page 12 Mr. Holt said that he also agreed with the first two phases of j Masch Branch Road but did not quite agree with Phase III. Ne li said that if the road was aDeolute!y nec~esscry it would be okay, but if the $835,000 could be used on roads that are in need, then it should be converted. Mr. Clark said that Phase III is neceseary for the development of the area. He said that if they could approve ?hare IV for next year, it could be finished by 1995. Mr. Claiborne sold •hAtt he wanted to look at the alternatives for Phase III and that he was not opposed to it. He said that they may want to suggest putting it in 1993-94 instead of 1992-93. Mr. Claiborne agreed that by putting in phases I and SI, it may j stimulate development in the area. 1$k DRAINAGE. None ?resented PARRS AND RECREATION, Mr. Ramman said that he felt $800,000 for land was too high. Mr. Brinkman said :,let he thought it was the same estimate that the utility department used on their land projections. He said that the department also looked at < what the cost may be at the time of being purchased, Mr. Holt asked Mr. Brinkman if they would make two parks with the $800,000 if possible. Mr. Brinkman said yes. ; Ms. Brock asked it Kr. Brinkman would explain what the $1,000,000 for the new pool would purchase. Mt,. Brinkman said they would completely renovate the existing facility. This would consist of tearing down the current structure ■nd installing lockets, resurfacing the existing pool, putting in a new filtration system, and additional areas for the life- guards, He said that It could also modify the existing parking to add additional parking spaces and also to add two pools, one fog competition and one for t^ddlers. Ms. Brock asked if the competition pool would be Olympic silo, Mr. Brinkman said that an olympic pool is 50 meters whereas the q; competition pool would be 25 meters, Ka. Brock asked how much they would be expending the swimming ' pool area into the park. Mr. Brinkman said that he wasn't sure at this time. He said thrt they could get roro detailed once they hired an architect to design it. Mr. Claiborne asked it they would be using city equipment to do the job. Mt. Brinkman said that they did plan on using city;. •n- errant as much as possible. s PI_,i DtPAATXENT AND tMCRGBNCY SIRVICt6. None Presented Mr. Clark said that he wanted to note that on one of the handouts, oversiseE Street Participation was not included in the description but was incladod in the $100,000 cost. Meeting adjourned at Si2S p.m. f i ~I f 1 . I 1 h I V Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission Work Session April 20, 1980 A work session of the Flanninp and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas was held on Wednesday, April 20, 1988, at 5:30 p.m., in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Building. Fresent: Bill Claiborne, Ruby Cole, Ivan Glasscock, Judd Holt, and William Kamman, ` Absent: Euline Brock and Etha Hiker I Staff Present: Frank Robbins, Executive Director for PlannIng and Development; Elizabeth Evans, Piannin{{ Administrator; ` Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities; David Ellison, Assistant to the City Manager; Jerry Clark, City Engineers Lave Him, Direttor of WaterlWastewater y Utlt,tJesl Steve Brinkman, Director Parks and Recreation; John Cook, Fire Chief; Lee Allison, Senior Civil Englneerl Chris Smith, Administrative Assistantl Joe Thompson, Acting Airport Manager; Bruce Cardwell, Airport Assistant: t and Donna Baker, Secretary Chairman Bill Claiborne called the meeting to order. DISCUSSION OF REQUESTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN PROJECTS. 1. OPENING RWRKS. Mt. Ellison explained some of the handouts a e emm scion received. he said that there was a Master CIP rankini sheet. This was established by each department director 1lsting their projects In order of importance. Each department director was to rank each project and get a total ranking score for each. Mr. Ellisor asked the Commission to disregard the "Cumulative Total" column as, at this time, it was not very meaningful. Mr, Ellison said that what was located under the "Total Pro- ject Cost" column was restricted to Airport projects only, hr. Ellison said that there was on airport project left off between rankin order numbers SI and $S, This was for an Airport road with the total cost of 1100,000. This ranked 180, Mr, Ellison said that to last year's ranking sheet versus this year's, In most cafes, there were duplications. This was due to pro acts proposed last year that were not funded. Mr, Holt asked It Mr. Ellison knew which ones wire duplicated, i Mr. Ellison said that he did not, but in the presentations, they would see what had been duplicated, Mr. Ellison said that a Summary had been created showint CIP requests from citizens, he added that the summary was !n their back-up. 11, FIRE LEPARTUNT. Mr. Cook said that the first thin he wanted ll o a ru s was the possible renovation of the existin` Fire I' Stations fit at 3, and e. Also, the construction of FIre I Stations is and 8. he invited the Commission to take a tour of the fire stations and see what they could not see on paper, u i i i a b i k T I 1 P12 MIhUIES CIP hork Session April 20. 1988 Page 2 i i Mr. Cook said that the first area was on Safety and Security. the Police Department conducted a security check of the fire stations and found that the stations were not secure. He said that they were talking about power, in case of a power fail- ure, retrofitting the sprln W, systees, and a better master ` lock system. At times there is nobody at the stations and Ik during these times, the station is open and c n be easily van- dallied. He said that one thing that could be done would be putting in drop sates to protect the petty cash box as well as 1 important papers. Hr, Cook said that he would like to have all stat tons •upgraded t and renovated, as some of the stations are in very poor condi- tion. This would include converting all electrical stations 1 to gas, Mr. Cook said that it is very difficult to get parts for Stations IS and 1. He said that they were looking at beautification standards, as well 4 Mr. Claiborne amid that hr. Cook had mentioned retrofitting the sprinkler system, he asked Mr. Cook if there was insuf- ficient water flow at the station, Mr. Cook said that consid- ering the amount of investment that was in the building, as I well as the equipment, they were risking too such to not have a sprinkler system that was more advanced. He said that there are times when they leavthe in a hurry and those times are not uncommon. He belleved at it was important that they prac- tice what they preach to the public, Mr, Cook said that there should also be smoke detectors and fire extinguishers In every building. This would be the some as they would expect from any citimen. The building his a 100 year track record and he would like to keep it that way, the building cost 62,000,000 and the equipment is worth about $1,000,000. Ms. Cole asked if they had the flammable liquids stored, I Mr. Cook said that they did not have a storage for such. He added that it It had been i citigen, the Fire Marshal would C have shut them down until they could get one. Mr. Cook amid that Station 11 was deteriorating badly. The buildint Is shifting, causing the floor to crack and move as well, there has been a leak in the root which has caused the ceffinl to be in to collapse. he said that he has requested one-haft mill on dollars to have the roofs fixed, the walls I gutted, the floors fixed, and improve the entire package. He f` said that they could rebuild on the current site or combine stations 11 and 13, Mr. Cook sold that with the current growth around Loop 218, t station 12 would be needin8 some aerial equipment. The sta- tion is not equipped for aerial, due to the bey doors not large enou h to accommodate the equipment. This was 161 on the list o priority ranking, The cost for this was 6380,000. Mr, Cook said that they were asking $ISU,000 to replace the ` HVAC unit for station 13, this would also include painting and the repairing of the roof, This was listed 112 on the list of priority ranking, He said that they could consider relocating IS to the Airport or farther south. Mr. Claiborne asked if the ranking sheets were done by exec ` utive staff or the department directors. Mr. Cook said that III they were originally done by the department directors and then turned over to executive staff, Vt 1 i V i P62 MINUTES CIP kork Session April 20, 1988 Page 3 Mr. Cook said that they are the only department that does not generate revenues but 0st others need fire protection as well. He asked If the Commission would look at safety first. Mr. Ellison asked that the Commission take Into account that I the results came from the executive staff's analysing the rankings. Mr, kamman asked haw Mr. Cook arrived at Eagle brine and f Carroll boulevard for a possible site. Mr. Cook said that it y was a major east/west thoroughfare. He added that it was an a area from which there would be little difficulty in getting around the city in a short length of time. Mr. Cook said that station st needs to have the roof raised I 1 and reconstructed to be able to fit the snorkel. He said that { they do not have to abandon the station completely, they could have a temporary station in a mobile home or something until the construction was completed. This ranked e8 on the list. Mr. Cook said that the next Item they would like considered is a training facility, he said that the area best suited for this would be station 05, on hindsor Drive, when completed. This vas patterned after a station in Arlington. The cost would be 81,700,000. r` Mr. Cook said that they would like the Commission to look at a possible computer system for the Fire Department vehicles. This would provide a map showing the water lines that are In area. Mr. Claiborne asked if the cost would include a mainframe. Mr, Cook said that they would use the city's ■sinfrase and system, This would cut dawn on driving time and they would not need to use the city', computer, This would consist of a computer tied into the city's system. Mr. Claiborne asked how the construction for stations IS and 5 were going, along with the time frame and the sequence of them. Mr. Cook said that they had gone to City Council and presented the arcitltectual design. They will start the bid- dint in June and construction should start in July or August. It s set up to coo let* one right before the other and to have new eaployees in by October 1989, They were still work- G Ing on station 16 plans which say delay constriction a little. I fit. UTILITY DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION REGARDING ANNEXED TERRITORY. Mr. Ham said that he wanted to show the Commission a map, He said the map was color coded to represent the year the area received water and sewer lines. Each year they are required to consider new areas for water and sever lines for potential growth. This was also color coded on the map, Mr. has, assisted by Mr, Allison, showed that there is cur- rently a line that runs to Masch Branch Road. The proposed line would go down to Jim Christal Road and would be a 16" line. lie said that to put In the lines for Bonnie Brae would cost 63150000 due to the need to bore under Highway 380, he ` said that another area was Cooper Creek, from fallmeadow to Stuart. The cost would be 62500000. Mr. Ham continued to show different areas and the cost finstalling services hest University from I-$$ to Malone would cost 4400,0001 A short line on Brookhollow would cos: t 628,0001 Hickory Creek parallel to Highway 38U and to the Airport would be 6185,000; Masch Branch Road, University to Jim Christal Road was an ad- dltlonal 6130,000, Mr. Has concluded with Mayhill Road to the sewer plant on Mayhill Road costing 61800000. Mr, Ham said that this totaled 61,173,000 for water and sewer lines, R f P82 MINUIES C1P Mork Session April 20, 1988 Page 4 i Mr. Hem said that at the last meeting with the Commission there were questions about annexed areas that had not received utilities for five years or greater. He referred to two saps showing proposed water and sewer lines. i Mr, ham said that the water map showed each area alphabe- 11 tiled from A to H. Each area had a designated cost for water lines. lhese areas are as follows: R A) Bonnie Brae including Payne Drive, Riney Road, ■ portion of 288, Highway 77 to 1-35, and up 1.3S. $1,042,570 27,400' of 20" lines 404,S00 15,500' of 12" lines 11,866766D 7,000' of 1" Imes . itrmaa,aau B) L(op 286 including F.M. 2164 and Sherman Drive. 61,267,065 33,300' of 20" lines C) A portion of Loop 246 at Highway 380 and down Mayhlll Road. 6757,19S 19,900' of 20" lines D) The southeast corner of Denton. Including Spencer to Robinson Road. This section involves steen separate fines. I 6 312,010 8,200' of 20" lines 748,000 18,700' of 16" lines 111,360 3,000' of 12" lines 11760,8888 6,600' of all lines ir,a+irs~e E) Hickory Creek, from Montecito to F.M. 1161, 6 175,150 23,000' of 20" lines 141 440 4,000' of 12" lines T7 D2'T;3T77 F) Hickory Hill Road to Johnson Lane and up Highway $77 to intersection before Hobson, 6105410635 40,700' of 20" lines S8 696 2,200' of V Imes G) This section involves four separate lines between Roselawn and Corbin Road. 61,UZU,000 25,Soo, of 16" lines 205 436 7,700' of V lines Yoils ; 43, H) Jim Christal Road, including Hasch Branch Road and a portion of Scripture. 62480000 70200, of 16" lines 345,048 10,100' of 11° lines $3:$60 21000 of 8" lines 1) Center of Denton. Mr, Has said that there are two areas inside area I that were annexed prior to 1983 and are still not being served, These areas consist of 22 residences. The total cost for area A•h to receive water service is { 69,519,35!. i P62 m hots C1P Mork Session April 20, 1988 Page 5 Mr. ham continued with sewer lines. He showed areas A-f on the sewer map; t A) highway 380 to Loop 288, almost to F.M. 2164. $363,000 13,200' of 12" lines 230,00u 9,200' of IV lines s31t 13,800' of k" lines 8) F.M. 2164 to ha)hill Road. 6 616,000 15,400' of 21" lines 370,800 10,300' of 18" lines 330,000 11,000' of 1S" lines 41,250 1,500' of 12" lines 625,000 25,000' of 10" lines 18l 700 7,900' of 81, lines C) F.M. 426 to Santa Fe Railroad. $232.500 9,300' of 10" lines 4 3T. 0,300 16,100' of 8" lines $601,500 G) Santa Fe Railroad to 1.3Sk to Laurel. $ 7880400 21,900' of 18" lines 807,000 26,900' of IS" lines .90 000 4,000' of 10" lines =►,oAl E) I.3SV and Laurel to Highway 380 to intersection with 1.35. $ 316,250 11,500' of 12" lines 100,000 4,000, of 10" lines 441,600 19,200, of 8" lines F) Center of Denton. There are 1S areas inside the area F that are not serviced. These areas consist of 101 residences. Mr. Hat said that the total of A-E was 66,231,200 to service the areas with sewer lines. f Mr. Ham said that there are some water and sewer lines that the residents could tie onto by buylnj pro rata. These res- idents have chosen not to pay for their lines. Mr has said that most of the residents do not have water or sewer lines. Hr. Claiborne asked it water and sewer lines were subject to dual service, Mr, Has said that Argyle does come in partly and service some of the area, but they were the only one, he F j added that the City does have the authority to buy out that portion. Mr, Claiborne asked it the City provided cost into the area when the City annexed it, Mr. ham said yes, though only where it was requested, Mr. Claiborne asked it Hr, Ham had copies of the water and wastewater maps for the Commission, so that they could be reviewed before the recommendation, hr, Ham said that they did not. The maps ara about $0 percent complete and would need to be finished. Mr, Claiborne asked It they would provide copies of the maps for them. I PFZ MIhU7E5 C1P Mork session ti April 20, 1988 Page 6 3 i lY. PARKS F RfCRfAlIUH. Mr. Brinkman said that they had three tems out at 25 the next five years. } Mr. Brinkman said that the first item would be the renovation of the Civic Center Fool which is twenty years old. He said it would involve rellacfng the current uildinfa, putting in additional parking, and installing a new circu t ion fl tra- tion/system for the old pool. He added that they would also put in :r new pool to the north of the old. this would hove a 1 diving ea and also a tot pool. Mr. Brinkman said that the current pool's diving board had to be removed due to the water not being deep enough. Mr. Holt asked it there would be neighborhood pools prior to the new pool. Mr. Brinkman said there would not be any other pools prior to this one since they were not included in the kaster Plan. Mr, Molt asked the status on the D.I.S. D. pool. Mr. Brinkman said that last year Parks Department had requested one million dollars for an indoor pool. He sold that It was recommended by Planning and Zoning Commission and then later removed by Council. they did look at possible revenue bonds snd the re- port showed that it would be difficult. hr. Holt asked who decides where the money goes. hr. Ellison said that the City staff tried to add the pool into 1991.92 projects last year but City Council did not think it was a ppriority and +1so there were some problems with the location. He said that revenue bonds were their only other option. 4r. Holt asked that if the pool was not in the C1P, did that mean it would not be built. Mr. Ellison said that it could be funded either through general obligation bonds or revenue bonds General obligation bonds are bucked by the City, Revenue bonds are for a specific project but if the Clty could not afford funding for street projects, it would be difficult to fund one million dollars for a pool. i Mr. Holt asked it something big cue up, would it get funded through operstih budget, general obligation bonds, or revenue bonds. Mr, Brinhan safd that the only option they would have would be a street bond issue, Mr, Ellison said that the funds could also come (tom some benefactor. Mr. Claiborne asked how much it would take to just reno- vote without doing new ptojects at the Civic Caner pool. Mr. Brinkman said that one-half million dollars .+uld go { to the new pool and the rest would be for renovation. a Mr. Holt asked that, with a city this site, why was there only one pool. hr. Brinkman sold that the city is way behind on pool space. He said that by getting the additional pool along with the existing pool, it would be a start. Parks and Recre- ation staff would like to get the money so that it could be done next yogi. Mr. Kaaman asked why It was a top priority for the diving pool. Mt. Brinkman said that the current pool is too small and congested, They would, with a new pool, bt able to bare swim meets and still allow swimming in the existing pool. It theydwoulddlikeato addrtwo°mo enpool~ and morensmallerdpoolsat in the future, Mr. Claiborne asked it the pool made a profit. Mr, Brinksan sold no, but that it does come close to breaking even in good years. i I I i`. I P42 MINUTES CIP %ark Session April 2U, 1988 Page 7 Mr. Hrinkean said their second item was to increase theDe si:e nla of the girls' softball fields, along with lighting, Park. The project would also include expanding the parking area, developing practice fields, and the rM`ons8`lnkuannsaide new con(ession/restroom/storage building. this was ranked ISZ. Mr, Brinkman said that the last project that they would like funded was ranked s51. this involves placing funds in the CIP on an annual basis to acquite deve op new park areas as well as renovating existing parks. Mr. Brinkman said the project would, hopefully on an annual andain theject being, Acquireo 10n acres fund of community projects. being 1) 1) pparkl northeast or southeast area of Denton, 2) Develop one neighborhood park area that is donated/acquired by the City, and 1) Renovate one existing neighborhood park. Mr. Holt asked where the athletic field was in the 1987.88 CIP. Mr, Brinkman said that it was the development of Denis, Evers, and North Lakes. Mr. Holt asked the status of the development, kr, Brinkman ` said they have hired planners for all three parks. They ex- pect Denis. to be done soon and the other two before the end of f the year. Mr, Holt asked it they were going to go ahead with the Senior Center also. Mr. Brinkman said yes. rethat he t the were not creation 1s what separates Dentonefrom nof or Mr. He ss.id Halt thatsaid cities, and that the basketball courts, the pool, and all the park! are used by all. Y. AIRPORT, Mr. Thompson said they were not askin` for any CIP ua s, though they were asking to restructure CIP funds for 1991.91 plan. He said they would like to come back, at a later data, and present a list of priorities. ` Mr. Claiborne said there were no objections. fl Mr. Thompson stated that FAA money, at this times was verEirm i tight. he said that hopefully by hiring the Ik they would be able to help establish the 90/10 money. j Mr. Claiborne asked if when hr. Thompson amid FAA money was tight, if he meant the overnment was reluctant or something also. Mr. Thompson solo that may be part of it but the other part was getting approved. Mr. Claiborne asked when Mr. Thompson would hove the rest of I` the list back to the Commission, Mr, Ellison said iossibly by the ith the said It thhe some f w 90/10 match, he said that they could leave it and do it next year. Clark sold that when the SERVICES. Mr. Vt. PUBLIC .0' y re u res ere opera o cenotruct stre1 1 larger than t! 7* necessary for their particular development, the city is re- quired to covet the additional cost of construction caused by thercastnof overittehstreet pantieipationchisttraditionallyso been assessed to the Street Division's annual operating budget. i4 I i r ss t P84 MISUIES CIF Work Session April 20, 19bb Page b U. Clark continued that the cost for the oversiring has ranged from $ISO,000 to $200,000 per year, He said that theyy woulo like for the Commission to have $IU0,000 allocated eauf year for this cost, u i J VII. PUBLIC W'OPtF/EWGINEEk1h'G TPAFFIC. Mr. Ellison said that sta ad ooh-mod et t e things t at did not make funding last year. These Included l) drainage on Old North Road - Nottingham, 2) controller upgrades, Corbin Bridge, 4) i Colt Street drainage, 51 Holly Ifill drainage, 6) So meter 1 pool, 7) Archer Troll, 6) Borman School drainage, 9) Library bookmobile, l0) }Iulberr; from Ave. D to Ave. B, ll} Sycamore from Ave. D to Ave. Ce, 12) Paving of Johnson and Smith Streets, 13) street end drainage improvements for Acme Brick, 14) Ave. A from Prairie to Chestnut, and 1S) adding a lane to Ave. D, Wilshire to 1-3S East. Mr. Ellison continued with 16) develop store-front Iibrar- les 17) install slgnage system, Fort Worth Dr,lCarroll Boulevard, 18) secondary arterials - Bernard, Mulberry, and E Welch, 19) Irprove/widen Wilshire St. - Ave. D to Ave. C, 20) lighting of Denton High School, and 21) school district/- city Indoor pool - future school. 1 I Mr. Clark said that he wanted to list what En ineerin felt the priorities were for the C1P. He listed those as follows: I) Signals for 3 Control of Intersections $235,000 2) Turn lanes for Arterials $95,400 3) Oversize Street Participation $100,000 4) Cooper Creek Channel - 114 $1,000,000 {1 Mr. Clark said that the overall cost would be $4,000,0f0 for the project. He said that they are requesting $1,000,000 each year until the project's completion. Mr. Clark said that something needs to be started due to the flooding octurrIng in the area, Mr. Ellison asked how many people would be affected, Mr. Clark said that he estimated between 6,000 100000 people would benefit. S) Drains e Oak 4 Ave. G $100,000 1 M 6) Alexander Street Lrainage $118,000 7) Westwood Paving $235 000 k) Masch Branch Road - phase III $b30,000 Mr. Clark sold that 0ty would like both Phase Ill h IV of Masch ?ranch Road considered but with the $21200,000 cost of Phase IV, they would like it considered for neat year, 9) Sidewalks throughout Centon $100,000 I Mr. Clark said that he would like the Commission to con- sider $100,000 vatb year until they could catch up on the needed sidewalks. i I ;I r6z MINu7Es C1P Work So! ion April 20, 19Eb Page 9 1 ~ 10) Ector Street Lrainage - 01 1110,600 11) wlllowwoid Paving rr Bernard to Bonnie Brae $1,600,00(1 ! Mr. Clerk sold that there is some flooding occurring at liccormick Street. 12) Myrtle Street Paving and Ltainage $393-s2s,000 Mr. Clark said that there are several homes and businesses in the area that have dangerous driving conditions due to the flooding. e' Mr. Clark said that he was available for any questions the Commission may have. J Mr. Ho',t asked it at the intersection of Highway 77 and Boliver, there were plans to redo the ditch because of cars join` off the side. Mr. Clark said that they planned to redo the drainage system and that Texas Instruments has donated $500,000 towards the rebuilding of Highway 17 from University to 1.35E. The City would autch the ,mount. He said that it would be either four or six lanes. Mr. Holt said another flooding problem is at Mingo Rond before the golf course. Mr. Clark said that the repairs for it were on the 1966 bond issue. Ms. Cole said that there was ■Iso a problem where Ptalrle Street and Ruddell meet. The flooding comes from the orainage channel belntt too full and ``oln over Ruddell. She said that " she thought it may nerd to be c~eaned out. air. Halt asked what the plans were for the low water cros- i sins. Mr. Clark said that it was going to be rebuilt. [It said that the plans were done on the bridge and road. It would bid, hopefully, in May and would be about 170 feet long. Mr. Clark said that some of tha sVor projects were In the CIP but, due to the high costs, they c oat the priorities first. Ms. Cole asked if Bonnte Brae was oln9 to be reconstructed from I•SS to Highway 77. Mr. Clam said that it has already been rebuilt from 1•3S to Scripture Road and the current bond issue would bring It to Riney good. the developers would take it Erom Riney Road to Highway 77. He said that S. Bonnie Prat was ranked at #100. Mr. Clark said that the City needs to repair and widen other streets as well. VIII. GENERAL DISCUSSION ANO %RAP-uP. Mr. Ham said that he had %one a e n ormat on t-'FT-Fe`wanted to prtsent to the Co¢mfaslon, Mr. Maa said that in the five year capital improvements pro- gram, the water/wastewater departaent put aside $200,000 for water and $20o,0o0 for sewer lines. The Purpose is to repplace the deteriorated or substandard lines In conjunction wit A the street program. He said that If any of the streets that Engineering was planning to rebuild had deteriorated or sub- standard utility I nes, they would be replaced. i F { 1 A CPR vet M:NUlts j ClP cork Session April 20, 1988 Page 10 Mr. Robbins asked if at Masch Branch and at Bonnie Brae, they a" could put in water and sewer lines before repairing the . Mr. Mom said that they could be built on each side of rtoaheds road though generally the sever line is down the middle of the road. Mr. get Einto llis thesect that at the staff would like to Mr. U ltson said that staff would like to stay in the some to 6.3 consider million the dollars. and tos s a y.below area as ast year like the Commission at the 6.3 or 6.1 million dollar area so a tax increase would not be necessary. Osiborne oput in commented operating mbufelt dgetthat and leave the slitter projects to bond issues. i,eeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. z ~ } i i i l i j , 't ,I s is I t I 1 I i i t y4, 1 d I Minutes Joint Meeting of Planning and Zoning Commission and Public Utilities Board March 23, 1988 A point meeting of the Planning and Zoning Lcmm::sion Inc the Public J utilities Board was held on Wednesday, March 23, 198b, at S:OU p.m., a in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building, e Planning and Zoning Commission Members Present: Bill Claiborne, Euline Brock, Puby Cole, Ivan Glasscock, Judd Holt, William Kamman and Etna Kiker Absent: None Public Utilities board Members Present? Poland Laney, Mark Chew, Kenneth Frady and John Thompson Absent: Robert LaPorte Present Lloyd andlExecutivenOlrectorcforvEngineer- inq; Robert Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities; 4 John McGrane, Executive Director for Finance; Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; Ernie Tulles, Director of Electric Utilities; David Ham, Director of Water/Wastewater Utilities; Jerry Clark City Engineer; Joella Orr, Director of library; Steve Bit kman, Director of Parks and Recreation; Davio Ellison, Assistant i to the City Manager; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; Bob HagemanI Fire Marshall; Monte Mercer, Controller; Joe Thompson, Acting Airport Manager; Lee Allison, Senior Engineer; Cecile Carson, Urban Planner; Chris Smith Administrative Assistant; Audrey Bachman and Donna Eaker, Secretaries Chairman Bill Claiborne cal.ed the meeting to order. T* I. WORK SESSION TO RECEIVE UPDATE ON EXISTING FIVE YEAR CAPITAL 1 j Mr. Ellison outlined schedule for development of 1992-93 LIP 1 program following the public hearing later tonight, he solo Planning and toning Commission will hold two work sessions, the Executive Staff will meet to rank suggested projects, the Planning and Zoning Commission will make its formal recommend- ation to the City Council, and City Council action is tent-- tively scheduled for :uns 21, 19b8. Mr. Halt arrived at the meeting. Y Mr. Harrell stated this is an important 10 ivily, that city is trying to project what CIP needs are and hux to use limited resources over a period of time, He solo that city is working with a funded CIP through 1990-91 that it has been approved by voters. He sole it would be difficult to make adjustments during that period of time. Last year's program is the first year of the unfunded progqram Ind Public Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission will look at that 1991-92 program to refine it. City is now building 1992-93 LIP pro- gram. He said it is divided Into two parts. The utility portion is funded with a combination of bona issues issued by city revenue bonds paid off by purchases or city utilities, either water or electric, and operating revenues which are put - back into CIP within the utillty system. Mr. Laney Strived at the meeting, Mr, Harrell continued that very little CLP is funded by fl operating revenues, most of it is done through issuance of bonds. 1 i a f ; t i P62 anu Pub Minute. March 27, 1988 Page 2 In the non-utility area, city's property tax rate is 59,28 ? cents per hunured, or that amount 2U.5 cents Cevote0 to rearing outstanding ae0t. Me sold as the program was put together fat funding, the City COUncll mane that decision without shy kinu of a tax increase. Mr. Chew arrived at the meeting, Mr. Harrell added that the 2U.5 tents should be axle to take j care of program through the end, or 19bo-91 year. He said he I would like to emphasize that last year the amount to be funded ` by CIP was increased and mere will have to some refinement [t ( before taking it to the voters. 1 Mr. McGrane advised that the new tax reduction act will have an impact on the LIP. He said that since planning Is done four to five years out that previously earnings from bond had been used for things like inflation and aaaed engineering costs, but under the tax reduction act this can no longer be done. It will have to be rebated back to the government. He said that numbers mesa to be kept on target as much as pas- C sible. Mr. Holt asked about the indror swimming pool which was rec- ommenced by the Planning aria Zoning Commission last year but was not approved by the City Council. He silo that school board has money for its half and would like the City to glvt f1 its half. He said he had discovered since last year that the pool would be open for public use as well as school activities and It would also be available for elderly. He said he thought 1992 would be too late for List swimming poll and he wondered if it could be adjuster to an earlier Cate. i Mr. Harrell said that there really is not any flexibility on the three years remaining on funded DIP unless the Commission recommend wanted to s l soltl. He gold that there Isstill Council more the d1991-Y2 program consultant _wasChiredltooseenIferevenue b not onds could be solo. The consultant solo an indoor pool will pay for cannottbe iusedwonly GOA abonds, which hmeans It would have to be built into C1P. ` Chairman Claiborne asked Mr. Laney for comments. Mr. Loney stated that the Public iItillties board has been ' working on CIP for several months in general terms beginning with a work session on January 70. He eekid Mr. Nelson for an update on this. Mr. Nelson stated Lhat the Utilities Department has a list of specific projects, that a cecisfon meads to be made eDOUt how many are to be included. they ale also trying to address con. terns of the Lana Use Planning Committee about balcncea growth. He said they have looked at planninp forecaster at population E projections, end it loan forecasts. He solo the city is cut- rently serving water to Lake Cities ono construction Is under- way to serve Corinth, Hickory Creek and Argyle. He said city is now buying some water from Collas, that water will be taken from Like key RoLirts in the Ims, but by 2010 an additional water oup,~Iy will be needed. He uic that water plant require- / nlOsste, 11 l million requirements p are day, that gollons addition is needed. N per lU million an I coy, capacity is 12, an engineering stucy is lncluced in the CIP to analyze sire need, As far as electrical Is concernec, It would be mid to late 199LS before Additional capacity is heated; a bonus was given to some customers to shut down at 2 p.sr, last summer which conserved power. He said electrical budget is operational items, malntenance and replacement or existing Items. 1 1 + r PAZ and PLB Minutes March 23, 1986 i Page 3 F Mr. Nelson outlined major water projects as water plant, water tewer, hydroelectric units, water taps and meters, 2" water line replacements, specific water line replacements, unspec- iflea water line replacements, water line replacements for street program, and oversize water lines. He said they ate trying to replace and upgrade all 2" water lines over a period of time as lines are failing and continue to cause problems. Un question, he said that road repairs are included when road is torn out to replace lines. t. ` He continued that major wastewater projects are sewer plant addition, sewer lift stations, sludge disposal program, inflow/ infiltration corrections, specific sewer line replacements, unspecified sewer line replacements, sewer line replacements for street progra , oversize sewer lines. He said old clay tile sewer lines are being replaced. He said that major electric system projects include generator { overhaul, power plant equipment replacements/repairs, street i lights, a new building and dispatch center, conductor replace- ment, and two substation additions. He emphasized the need for a centralized dispatch system stating that the secretaries C. now handle this. Special electric projects are automated map- ping, energy conservation/A.C. efficieny program, electric load management, new building, utility dispatch center, radio systems, and converting overhead electric lines to underground. He said the automated mapping system needs additional funding, they have $10U,000 in budget this year for that. he also said that electric department is now maintaining all radio systems for the city Changing existing overhead electric lines to underground is $3UO,L00 per year and he questioned whether this is an appropriate amount. r S Mr. Nelson further stated that replacements are polo from , current revenues, that system additions and improvements are included to meet growth of city, that utility oversizes to ; serve anticipated growth for 15 to 20 years in vicinity of i line, that developers are required to extend from nearest water or sewer line of reasonable capacity. He mentioned special water line extensions of Masch Branch Road, Ranch Estates to Masch Branch Road; rusch Branch Road, University to Jim Christal Road; Bonnie Brae Road, University to Mayne Drive; Airport to hest Side, for a total of $blB,UOU. Special sewer line extensions mentioned were Cooper Creek, Failmeadow Addition to Stuart Road; west university, I-35 to Malone; Broekhollow; Hickory Creek Parallel, Highway 3bO to Airport; Masch Branch Road, University to Jim Christal Road; and Mayhill Road, Mayhill to Sewer Plant, for a total of S1, 173,OGU. He said $250,000 a year has teen set aside for water and con- Committee for sewer balanced growth. he cerns oOf Lana year has Planning set said they need direction on where those lines need to go. He said they also need direction on whether to leave special water line and special sewer line extensions in; those lines are not needed to serve existing customers. Mr. Frady asked if property owners would be assessed. Mr. Nelson Sala they would be assessed as they tied on, how- ever, that normally would not pay entire cost. Mr. Nelson said policy questions neeo to be addressed: Should there be a maximum amount to meet LUPL goals, how much should be set aside to achieve this goal? Should there be a revolving fund? Should this come from current revenues or bond funds? i 1 4 ) I P62 and PUB Minutes 1 March 23, 19b8 Page 4 i He said when funds come from current revenues, there is a are d time 4 percent rate increase. If taken from bona funds, a 1/2 percent per year increase would be required, he said they tend to recommena use of Current revenues, that lines need to 1 be put where City can get most revenues. I Chairman Claiborne advisee that it was time for the pu0llc hearing to begin and adjourned the meeting at 3:33 p.m. to the Council Chamber for the public hearing, II. PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE SUGGLST10N5 FUh PROJECTS TO BE j NLLT-ULI-N THE FIVE Y AR CAPITAL M hG1E MEN 5 PL--AN. ) Chairman Bill Claiborne welcomed a new staff member, Uonna Baker, and opened the public hearing. Mr. Clark gave a triefiny on the status of current Llr projects. Projects discussed were paving, drainage, site- walks, turn lanes, bridges, signalization, and the Master Drainage Plan. He said the drainage regulations are being put ` in legal form and will be presented to the Planning and Zoning If Commission and City Council for approval. The final draft of l the drainage design manual has been receiveo and they hope to have that reviewed in the next two weeks and, provided Crain- age regulations are approved by Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, the manual will be ready for use. The next { phase of master Drainage Plan, when completeo, will be the actual expansion into the ETJ to cover the entire 133 square mile area currently mapped. Mr. Brinkman gave a progress report on the Parks and Recrea- tien projects. He said a construction meeting was held this i' week on the Martin Luther King, Jr. Center ano construction j will start next week. Park planners have been hired to work on Dania, North Lakes and Evers Parks and park plans should be completed by December of this year. An architect will be hired to work on expansion of Senior Center in May, with con- } stroction expected to start in January 1969. Ms. Orr said that the library staff and Library Board have been working with library planners on plans for the library and a report will be sutmittea by the end of April. Mr. Svehla statea that sites for the two future fire stations have been acquired at Lillian Miller and Teasley Lane, and at Bonnie Brae and Windsor Drive. The preliminary drawings have been completed and will go to bid in July or August 1966. Mr. Svehla addeo that the three fire engines were completeo and shipped from Peterbilt last week ano delivery is expected on the first one in October. Chairman Claiborne turned the chair over to Roland Laney, Chairman of the Public Utilities Board. Chairman Laney took the chair and asked for public input for the Utility CIP program for the years 198b-93. He stated that he would like to remind the citizens that when the City spends " money for utilities, they have to get it back, whether it is through bona issues or current revenues and that this affects rates. Ray Meckel, with Denton County health Department, named three areas with recurring sewage problems: 1) on 360 East, the Capricorn Mobile home Park; 2) on 36U West, the Denton Estates Mobile Home Park; and 3) on Mayhill Road, from around Gayle Moad down through Maymill Mobile Home Park. These areas are not on the city's sewer system, they are controlled by their own septic systems and could benefit greatly by having sani- tary sewers. In the lost year, the Denton County Health i Paz and PUB Minutes March 23, 198b Page 5 i Department has received numerous valid complaints due to the problems with these systems. The problem in all three areas is 010, small lots, inadequate for disposal, and frequently sewage surfaces. At Capricorn, sewage flews into a field south of park; along Mayhill Aoao, sewage flows onto adjacent properties; along Gayla, sewage flows into a drainage creek; at Centon Estates, sewage flows Into a drainage ditch that goes under 38L. On question, Mr. Meckel said that all of these systems were installed years ago before any type of regulations or controls were in place and with the little room that they have to work with, they cannot ado disposal fields for on-site disposal. Mr. Frady asked Mr. Meckel what his authority is to require them to correct the situation. Mr. Meckel said they are an f exten51cn of the state health department and it is their I official capacity to abate any „ olation. on further ques- 1 tien, he said It is not feasible to order them to correct E the situation. I Chairman Laney askeo if these were either in the Denton city limits or partially in city limits. Mr. Meckel sold that they were. Walter Kingston, 1921 Gayla, stated that he has been in the city for the last two years and has not received any city help otter then trash pickup. He Sala he has two septic tanks and has added lateral lines so that his back yard is completely covered with lateral lines, that when it rains sewage will rise and then flews Into a ditch. He said he is on a clay hill and there is no way for It to soak up. !7111ce Duvall, 2100 5auls Lane, pzesioent of the Central i Business District Association, referred to a letter suLmitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission by him which outlines some major problems in the city. Among the Items which are of concern to the association are: 1) signs that would en- hance the Central Business District; 2) parking needs to be addressed; 3) paving needs to be continued; o) there is no access for existing handicapped parking on some parts of the square and signs designating handicapped parkl(.g are not ap- propriate; S) sidewalks are in a general state o' disrepair; a) dumpsters are unsightly but they can't have a solution; and 7) in general, the beautification of the city, distinctive lighting in particular. he added that the Central Business District Association is becoming more active, the city has appointed a Beautification Committee and a Maln Streat Com- mittee and the Association will be working with those com- mittees. Chairman Claiborne stated that there are currently ClP funds committed for more street paving for streets surrounding the square. These are on hold due to the problems with relocation of underground utilities and the location of the large boxes. He added that if anyone could come up with a solution to the dumpster problem, the Commission would be interested in hear- ing It. Chairman Laney added that cable service is now avail. able around the square. Norma Gamble, 2205 North bonnie Brae, addressed road condi- tions and water and sewer problems in the North Bonnie brae area. She said she heard Mr. Clark say that North bonnie Brae would Le constructed beDinning about January 1989. She Salo It is now a dangerous situation and improvement has been needed for many years and they are looking forward to it. She said theta are many acres in the area just 2 1/2 miles from the Courthouse which nave been in the city for 30 years. They cc not have water or sewer. She stated that Mi. Nelson had referred earlier to an oversized water line on bonnie brae to y F, kr V Pt<2 and Pub Minutes March 23, 19b6 Page 6 r 3 j tc installed. They woulo iike to have the water line out in before the road is put in so that the rcao would not have to be tarn up. The water line is needed not only for the res'- cents, but also for the new fire station at Winosor ano bonds 111 Brae. There could be a major problem if there is a fire that could not to reached due to a lack of water lines In the area. The Fire Department has had to use pumper trucks in previous fires. Mrs. Gamble added that she is on a septic system, as well as other neighbors, and they would like to be on city sewer. She would like to develop her land, but is unable to put in water lines due to the cost of those lines. She has no one to share the cast with because the mayor property owner across the street is city park. She was told several ears ago the cost for their one house would be 656,000. She does I D not think this is fair. Ms. Gamble added that she would like the Commission to consider this first before the city starts looking at projects outside the city limits or on the very exterior of the city limits or projects added since they have f 1 been in city. 1 Joe Burris Salo his interest IS a thoroughfare that he is running from 380 south through the airport and possibly on down to 2449, which would constitute a west airport loop. He said even if city Is participating on paving, he would i i like utilities put in at the same time. He said if this is done, a public/private partnership or whatever manner it is done St would possibly open up west side of Denton for inuus- trial development. He said 4,000 feet of waterline and a sewerline is needed. Chairman Laney asked if this would be outside the proposed Loop 2b8 area. y Mr. Burris said that it would not be on the outside, but rather on the inside of Loop 286. he said he had been told that this was located on a fall line where sewage flows down- hill. It the city would install heavier utility mains, in this area, then it would be possible to serve that entire part of the city without building a lift station. He said if mains could be run alongside the road, all that property would be available for development. Mr. Burris said that he would like the Commission to consider improvements for water and sewer In this area. bill Holt, Economic uevelopment Director for the Chamber of Commerce, referred to the existing CIF as it pertains to Masch branch Road. He said he feels Masch Branch Road is important to opening up the west sloe of Denton, he said in analyzing land use patterns that appear to be developing on west side of the city, he feels the city is sharing good thinking in trying to bring thoroughfares and utility structures into that area. he said Internal streets will be built by others but critical need is to get quick access to 35E from the west side of the city and making the extension to Loop 7bb the next pri- ority Shculd be considered. He added that there as a lot of activity on west side of Denton now and to enhance ability to ' attract quality eevelopment to Denton, a quick access to 35E from 31W Is absolutely critical. Allie Miller, Route 1, Box 4U9, on Masch Branch Road, stated that he has been in city for six years. He said that he is In a cesignated growth area and has had several industrial prospects but none have been big enough to bring in utilities alone. He asked that, since the building of Mason Branch Road is two to three years away, the city go ahead and put in the sewer and water lines before the building of Masch Branch Road. He commented that the road Mr. Burris referred to is to yd to a proposed asphalt batch plant which he 1s against. i w I I P62 and PUB Minutes March 23, 1986 Page 7 i Paul Haygddd, pastor of Life Tabernacle Church, stated they have 10 acres at the corner of Bonnie Brae and Windsor on which they are endeavoring to build a church, but they have I no city utilities. He said Bonnie brae Street is included In CIP Out CIP also needs to include the water and sewer lines to this area. He said a water loop, a fire loop, a fire sta- tion, toads, sidewalks, perimeter Improvements are neeoea. ' He said they nee to build a church, a community. He stateo that he is for atvelopment and growth, but not at the expense of the taxpayers no community services. he feels the city should pay attention to the people who are already here instead of thinking of ways to bring more people into the City. He stressed that the North bonnie erae area is an area that needs help first. Gene Gamble, 2265 North bonnie Brae stated that he owns lb acres. he said he lives about .4 m~l0 north of University and about 2 mile South of Windsor and that the closest they are to utilities is 1,000 feet. Mr. Gamble stated that they were I able to talk the city into bringing utilities to Bonnie brae when the recreation center was put in, but they have not been is able to use them yet. He Sala if a sewer line was put in, it wouId cover 750 acres for single family homes. He added he felt the city would like to see the street at the west/north- 1 west corner of his property opened up to relieve some of the f traffic from the Greenway area. He has spoken with the Parks/ Aecreatlon and Fire Department personnel and they both feel that these utilities are needed to get proper pressure. He said Parks &ISO would like to develop their 60 acres across ! the street from his property. Dwight Bore" 21UU Parksiae, stated that last year a private survey of the traffic at the intersection of Bonnie Brae and Windsor found that, in a 24 hour period, 10,000 vehicles had gone through much traffic, this road intersection. Hshould be addressed. tAlong with the road repairs, there Is also a need for water and sewer lines in the area. I i Larry Frank, P.O. Box 2753, stated that he is speaking on behalf of W. H. 5mith, who owns 52 acres at Payne and bonnie Brae. Mr. Smith has owned this property since 1972 and about 1974 granted an easement across the corner of his property so that the lake could be built. He continued that about 18 months ago he requested a zoning change for Mr. Smith but was unable to proceed because of the distance the utilities would have to be extended. They feel the waterline should be run down Bonnie Brae for the fire station and for housing in that area. Mr. Frank said they feel that the city should put in water and sewer lines to accommodate the people in this area. He atltled they have recently spent considerable time with a prospective developer of Mr. Smith's property for 5F-7 lots. Mr. Ham addressed the areas that have teen annexed since 1985 and stated that the city Is required to consider, each year, whether to serve annexed areas with water wnd sewer. he pointed out areas which were annexed in 1985, in 1986 and in 1987 and the cost required to serve those areas. The total for all the areas for all three years is $6,2U6,500. He said this IS Offered for consideration as to whether these areas should be recommended in the CIP. Chairman Laney asked for some information stout the Bonnie Brae and Windsor area, where the major concerns seem to be. Mr. Ham replied that a large sewer Ire up Hinkle Orive has been completed which will increase capacity all the way up to the North Lakes area and up to the corner of Windsor and bonnle Brae. He said that sewer line could be exteneea to serve properties at that corner which would include the Smith, Gamble, church property, and the fire station. On question, I I P4Z and PUB Minutes March 23, 1968 Page 8 he said that line plus the line to serve Texas Instruments were 51200 to take care of that upper zegfOn. Nr. Thompson saiddyes this was on a first tome, first serve basis. Mr, Ham , y, Mr. ham waterlineawouldahave totcomeofrome380"lle gdfng znorth eario tthat tWould mcost r$e380,gioCOL. This would open up water service Windsor to the co ha n. It woUIO tie In ano loop the 84 line along rner Of Bonnie arse across ano in front of North Lakes Recreation Lenter. It in the LIP for next year, however, this is a line the was U in the meht would Boardito consider Zoning moevelopment PuItem blic because 0OUlo not necessarily benefit the llty Department, ft would be maze to open Up development In this area. He Pointed out some areas with problems due to oltler lines that need to be replaced because of deterioration, breaks, and also for up- grading from 24 lines. Mr. Ham identified lines that they would like considered as community development lines as: 1) Masch Branch Road water. line, extend down frcm Ranch Estates out 380 and then south ' on Masch Branch Road; 2) waterline across airport which would open up development an the west side of the airport; 3) Bonnie 6tae water line; 4) Cooper Creek parallel sewer line; 5) west University parallel sewer line; 6) parallel sewer line for t hickory Lreek and another branch of that which would possibly serve twest; could serve O ad d trSe 11 er e as ailer parrk. men- Chairman Claiborne asked Mr. Ham if he had a map of the city which showed all areas that had not received city water/sewer t for the last five years or greater, Mr. Ram said that he does i have a map that shows what areas have not received utilities f for some time. He sold he does not have a ma how many years each area has gone without utilities,nthatathat Information would have to be coordinated with the Planning and Development Department. Chairman Claiborne asked Mr. Ham how long it would take him to construct a map showing those areas Mot Saidraboutlagweek. Chairman years or himator the Planning Department and prepare such a map - Mr' Ham ?et with asked that the map be presented to both the Planning iandnZcning Commission and the Public Utilities Board, thegcornernofMWindsorssmd Payne, that waterline now 6 goes to per ootminute line. He than single family dAndaWhat IstnppdeddSSna 2~SU 0.gallons 3'000g gallons per minute line, which would be a 16" line. The plan would be to run a 16■ line from University up Bonnie Brae and tie Into the 80 line at Windsor. Mr. i the suiroundingdarea, herfeltethattaclargerdsizeelinetwouldo q be necessit for uestion, he Said tthatothepwaBre area. Mr. ter line would bemplaceodan the shoulder of the road, so no road work would be necessary. He Salo sewer lines go down the center of the road; however, there are no plans at this time for a sewer line, due to the little development in this area, Mr. Hageman stressed the need for fire protection for the people in the bonnie Brae area and for the further expansion of the He alsoarlfetred t dith a Sch looping Branch uarealwmerertherethavedn, been flres requiring water to be shuttled from University, ,r i i N I PAZ and PUB Minutes March 23, 19b8 Page 9 i 500 gallons at a time, which is time consuming and fires can't wait. He asked the Planning and Zoning Commission ana the Public Utilities Board to look at these two areas that are in desperate neea for water for fire protection, f Chairman Claiborne took the Chair and proceeded with Nen- Utility CIP requests. Mr, Burris said that he felt the city should participate in road funding on the west siee, particularily on what he callea the west Airport Loop Thoroughfare, as there ate only about four property owners involved, Including the city airport, He fl J) saia this is the road that runs from 36U down the west side of the airport and down to 2449 which is on the Master Thorough- fare Plan but It has not been named. Mr. Holt said that he did not share the concerns of Mt. Burris about that particular roadway. He said he felt the major con- tern was Loop 268 south between 35W and 35E. Rodney Haire, 306 Stormridge Circle, Argyle, said he is speak- j Ing for Liberty Church and School at 15UU Bonnie Brae Street. I He said that the condition of the road is very bad, that there are two foot ditches on each side of the road and that this road is too narrow to properly allow room for two vehicles. The road is a safety hazaro for students who drive to school as welt as the buses. He saia that dally there are six j d vehicles that catty students back and forth to area cities as { well as in Denton. He added that the school has been upgraded and will be hosting more athletic events in the future which means more buses on the road. He asked the Commission to include improvement of Bonnie Brae in the CIP, i y Chairman Claiborne said that there were two families who were unable to attend, due to a death in the family, but that they have sent letters to state their feelings on some problems that they see. One area is a drainage problem on West Oak Street and Avenue G. After several conversations with Engi- neering, they were told that the problem would be corrected ; in October 1987 and it was not. This letter was signed by Eleanor Swan and Lorene Wells. Another drainage problem that he had been made aware of is at the corner of Cordell and Malone. Mr. Clark stated that these areas ari projects in the CIP. i Mr. Thompson asked why there was only $25,000 put In CIP for traffic signals; he felt that would not be enough, Mr. Clark stated that this amount was just for controller upgrades. He stated that it is hot necessary to put in a whole new signal system just to upgrade the current system, Mr. Thompson asked if the cost of the signallzation is included in the street Improvements section of the CIP, Mr. Clark said no. He advised that 6225,000 was put in CIP last year for three new traffic signals. Mr. Thompson said that he felt that traffic signals are an Important issue ono that the situation would steadily become worse. Mr. Clark said that between now and ` the time a signal is scheduled, if it becomes a bad situation, Engineering will place the problem in the operating budget. He said signals are in the 1991-92 CIP, Reverend Haygood said that he and Mr. Frank would like to request a orainage study to to completed for the Bonnie Brea project where the city cut out canal through concrete runoff to the North Lakes project. He said that periodically, not often, there is 120 to 200 of water at the Bonnie Brae and Windsor intetsection. He said he was told at one time that all drainage problems would be eliminated in the CIP. Mr, Clark stated that if the developer develops after the project, the city will put the culverts in and handle the box culverts along with the major pipes. He said these were figured into the cost when they were Initially estimated. i e v PbZ and PUB Minutes } March 23, 1988 Page 10 Chairman Claiborne askea if there were any other questions or commPnts.regaroing utility or non-utility matters. None were offered. he thanked the Public Utilities Boara for joining the Commission, also the utility staff. He also thanked the public for coming to share their requests and comments with the Commission and the eoarl. s Joint P&Z/PUB meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. ,s r i s F ~ 11I I ~yl ( I E th' ' f L k'. 1 i f 1 'a { • ' rv ~ I 1 ~ 7 i t Y r 1tS~ 6'. I k 1 t y r~ . 1 I q 43 1 I i.r I' I I t 1989-1993 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN x 3 I ~ ~ rl 0 I G rl `Ifl! ~ II I' II'I'i l t! ~ III''I f it ,I~ ru lid 41" ' III I" t DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES I I - I~t f I ' f ary of DLNTAN DENTON, rExAs rozof MEMORANDUM DATE: June 2, 1988 TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Roland Laney, Chairman, Public Utilities Board RE: Denton Municipal Utilities 1989-1993 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Attached hereto please find the Utility Department 1989-1993 Capital Improvements Plan. The Public Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission have reviewed this plan and recommend for inclusion in the City's overall Capital Improvement Plan. Respectfully, Ffbland aney, ha r n R. Nelson, Executive z!?c or Public Util ties a and Department of Utilities Exhibit I 1989-1993 Utility Department CIP Executive Summary ;i 5502U:16 . s~ kkn J I . _ k i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 1989-93 Utility Department Capital Improvements Plan is based on the January 1988 Planning Forecast, which projects a population increase from 62,943 in 1988 co 73,317 in 1993, which represents a compound growth rate of 3% per year. The majority of capital expenditures will be required to serve the new customers which are being added to the system. The Electric Department expects 6,567 new customers to be added which will regoire extensive capital expenditures for these customers and improvements to maintain reliable service to the existing customers. Two new substations will be added and considerable funds will be used for customer incentive and load management programs. Major expenditures in the hater Department include a new water plant with an associated five mile pipeline and ~h booster station, hydroelectric unit, line replacement and j A a new elevated storage tank. i In the hastewater Division, major expenditures will be l required for an equalization basin, plant expansion and line replacement. ' In addition, Development Guide water and sewer lines will be installed to enhance development in selected areas. ;t The Electric Department will convert overhead lines to underground as part of the city beautification program. 1 ES-1 -r r i 4 t { i Electric System The Electric System will require $35.025 million in capital funds during the 1989-1993 period. The major electric system improvements are toward plant improvements ($2.7 million), purchasing of transformers ($6.3 million), upgrading or building new substations ($1.9 million) and extensions of the distribution system ($8.9 million). System improvements and additional street lighting will cost $2.7 million. Additional building space, a computer assisted drafting system for the Engineering Staff and Control Room modifications will cost $2.6 million. r r Acquisition of proposed electrical facilities is $ .75 million and overhead to underground conversion will amount to $1.5 million. Load management and customer incentive programs are budgeted at $4.2 million, The motor pool and tools/equipment will cost $2.4 million, A detailed listing of the Electric Service projects is found as Exhibit I of this report. Funding for the electric projects will be provided by i three main sources. 1) bond funds, $24.289 million; 2) i current revenues, S 9.824 million, and 3) aid-in-construction and other sources, $912 thousand, The Energy Cost Adjustment (the incremental amount of each bill which is due to immediate short-term fluctuations in fuel costs) decreased in 1988. Fuel costs presently are lowering according to the normal decrease of summer spot gas prices but slight increases may begin to appear toward the end of 1988 and early 1989 when a new gas contract will be required. ES-2 s k Rate increases are caused primarily by increases in the j cost of purchased power and the planned capital requirements. This Capital Improvements Plan indicates no increase in rates in 1988 and a modest increase in rates in 1993. Increase in rates will be closely associated 4 with the cost of natural gas during the next five years provided the proposed sale of Comanche Peak is finalized. Two other major factors will affect the rates. The concentrated effort to improve the system load factor by the use of custoner incentives and load management will help reduce our fixed purchase power cost while any substantial efforts by large customers to install cogeneration will increase fixed cost and debt service cost to the remaining customers. Cost of debt service is anticipated to increase from .46 cents per Khk currently, to _.57 cents per KhH in 1997, The Electric Utility will need to sell $24.250 million in additional bonds during the next five years. This will move the Electric Service debt to equity ratio from a current ratio of 31:69 to a ratio in 1993 of 44:56. a f:S- 3 4 f' I Y~ate-- r-System r ~ The hater Utility will nave an estimated 3,G26 additional I water customers during the planning period (17,171 in 1988 and 20,197 in 1993), The Denton area increase at a steady rate of a little overothreeion will during the plannin Percent g period, ~ To provide adequate water service, is anticipated that $26.839 million in capital funds will be required over the next five years. $15,450 million will be required for an additional water plant and associated pipeline and pumping station. This will increase the present 30 MGD capacity by ten million gallons per day (MGO) to 40 MGD, ' Replacement of water lines and oversize water lines will ~ cost $7,863 million and Development Guide water lines, $1,250 million. Tne Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Plant will } cost approximately $3,557 million, with the water and wastewater systems sharing the costs on a 50~-50~ basis. ~ A more detailed explanation of y Department's the hater/kastewater ` protects are included as Exhibit II of this ~ report. The water Service has three orator funding sources; 1) bond ' funds, $2G.303 million ~ ~ 2) current revenue, $4,467 million, and 3) aid-in-construction $ .713 million and other, $3;336 million. Other changes to the cost of water to the customer during the planning period 1989 to 1993 will decrease the per gallon cost from $2,43 per 1000 gallons in 1989 to $2,32 per 1000 rate increase is anticipated far Qo obern1,i198893, An 8,5~ i Uebt service is expected to increase from the current rate of $0,38 per 1000 7993, Total additional nbonds $requiredr to000 gallons in ~ protects during the and capital planning period will be $17,550 { million. ES•4 e. I^ V I l> kastewater System The kastewater Utility will have an estimated 2,451 additional wastewater customers will be added during this planning period {13,404 in 1988 to 16,355 in 1993}, f I Improvements and replacements to the kastewater System are j projected at $19.215 million. Plant improvements include an equalization basin ($1.100 million) and a plant expansion costing $5.760 million. This expansion will add three MGD to the existing plant. Other projects include upgrading of lift stations .208 million), laboratory improvements ,295 million), replacement and oversizing of sewer lines ($4.640 million), infiltration/inflow corrections ($2.172 million), Development Guide wastewater lines ($1,250 million). No increase in sewer rates is planned until 1990. The average cost to the residential customer during the planning period will be $11,38 for 2989 and $15,04 for ~ 1993 per month. Debt service costs will increase on a per month per residential customer basis from the 1989 amount of $6.69 to $12,07 In 1993. Bond sales of $15.227 million will be needed. Rates will provide an additional $3.326 million, aid-in-construction .144 million, and other funds will provide $0,518 million. Total debt to equity ratio for the hater and kastewater Departments will go from the current 38;62 to 59;41 in ` 1993, This is due to the major construction phase the departments are experiencing. ES-5 I low I" Summary E i It must be recognized that any number of circumstances may affect the above projections and plans. For example, Texas "man' s University and North Texas State University have expressed a desire to develop cogeneration projects which will decrease Denton's sales to these customers. This would place a greater portion of the debt service and fired costs of the Utility upon the remaining customers. However, this impact may be nullified or at least lessened by an increase in load as a result of the Texas Instruments plant which will become operational in the fall of 1986. Anticipating that these two factors may have offsetting impact, no specific adjustments to the forecast were made as a result of these issues. The replacement, upgrading and building of new facilities to serve the expanding population and aging equipment is 3 requiring major construction 'during the five year planning t period. This increase in construction activities is an important factor in the amount of bonus required and the rates required. Respectfully submitted, R. E. Nelson, Executive Director Denton Municipal Utilities 4879U;8-13;R.4/88;R.5/88 ES-6 t i f 1 1989 - 1993 CAPITAL IMPROVED ENT PLAN ELECTRIC UTILITY $ X 1000 POWEV, PRODUCTION MAINTAIN/REPLACEMENT 2,170 OVERHEAD EXTENSION $ IMPROVEMENTS (25 MILES MAIN FEEDER) 30344 UNDERGROUND EXTENSION & IMPROVEMENTS (7.5 MILES MAIN FEEDER) 5,595 DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS 60324 METERS 69567 CUSTOMERS 837 ,I LOAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 5,000 CUS'1CMERS 10125 CUSTOMER INCENTIVE 5,000 CUSTOMERS 31040 MAPPING SYSTEM - CAD/AM/FM 200 DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATIONS DUPLEX POCKRUS 89, AUDRA NEW 91 1,903 STREET LIGHTING 19169 VEHICLES 11225 t TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT 11233 POWER PRODUCTION IMPROVEMENTS 568 R/W AND FACILITIES PURCHASE 750 OFFICE EQUIPMENT, FURNITURE 478 BUILDING SPACE - CENTRAL CISPATCH, OFFICE, SHOP 900 91 10483 COMICATION if CONTROL S91 POWEe FACTOR IMPROVEMENTS - MAINTAIN 0,98 SOO EOONCMIC CONDUCTOR REPLACEMENT (25 MILES) 10000 OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND CONVERSION (2.3 MILES) 1,500 35,025 ^j Y CIP032388008 ~J 198) - 1993 CAPITAL IMPROVEWNT PLAN WATER DEPARTMW X 1000) NBW WATER PLANT (INCLUDES NEW PLANT EXPANSION IN 1993) S 15$00 ELEVATED STORAGE 1,000 RAY ROBERY3 IMRO ELECTRIC 3,556 9 EQUALIZATION BASIN 1,100 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT RENOVATION 372 LIFT STATION SCADA, RENOVATION, RvzriVATION 428 WASTEWATER TREATMENT (OT}ER Ih>pftOVE?1afIS) (5 YR PLAN, LAND UTILIZATION, SEPTIC TANK PLMING 574 INNOV. 6 ALTERNATIVE TECH. ETC) 1 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ERPANSIQif ' 5,760 LABORATORY IMPROVf7EgTS S74 MAPPING SYSTI3f - CAD/CAM 230 OVERSIZE WATER LINES 800 REPLACE WATER LINES 5,050 s NEW WATER LINES 870 ra DEVELOP GUIDE WATER LINES 1,250 OVERSIZE SEWER LINES 850 REPLACE SEWER LINES 3,610 r,~ 1 INFILTRATION INFLOW 2,172 DEVELOP GUIDE SEWER LINES 1,250 TOPS, FIRE HYDRANT, EQUIPMENT 6 MISCELLANEOUS 1,522 MOBILF. EQUIPMENTS 1.586 48,054 CIP032988009 E-2 J Ii r~. t 12-May-88 UTILITY S:9TEM PROFORMA 09:06:13 (i X. 1000) f ACTUAL EST/ACT FY FY FY FY FY REVENUES 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1 Electric Sales A52,297 $549985 $56,429 $58,347 $61,090 =64,023 868,555 2 Electric Mise 19873 1,885 11819 19689 11785 1,800 11873 3 TNPP d Other Off Sys. 90085 11,104 9,305 139243 14,637 15,887 14,700 4 Water 4: W/W Sales 10,826 14,997 169153 179983 19,543 20,635 21,855 5 Water k W/W Miac 504 345 315 329 224 161 117 6 TOTAL REVENUES $74,685 $83,316 $83,821 $910591 $97,279 $102,486 $1079100 EXPENDITURES 7 Personal Services $6,769 $7,953 $8,378 $99179 $10,019 $109942 $11,938 8 Supplies 583 827 931 964 11007 1,048 10097 9 Production Power W/W 11046 19117 11170 742 780 830 873 i 10 Maintenance 2,034 29559 31340 31498 31651 49811 3,994 11 Services 921 1,058 11377 11424 1,489 1,549 1,618 12 Purchase Water 829 827 562 89 82 82 82 13 Insurance k Sundry 325 582 1,039 11071 1,122 1,166 11213 14 Bad Debt 10163 443 710 371 390 410 436 15 Administrative Trans 29450 2,226 2,293 21407 21503 2,603 29707 16 Ray Roberts Pats 0 19875 1,882 11886 10924 10962 29064 17 TOTAL OPERATIONS $16,120 $190467 $219682 $21,631 $229967 $24,403 $26,022 18 Purchase Power L Fuel $47,139 $48,131 $47,830 $50,030 $529331 854,738 $57,256 19 NET OF OPERATIONS $11,326 $15,718 $14,309 $19,930 $21,981 $231345 $23,822 NON OPERATING EXPENDITURES 20 Debt Service $5,775 $5,537 $68270 $79706 $9,317 $9,677 $10,188 21 Fixed Assets 11028 2,267 2,784 29983 30012 3,787 41238 22 Other 31060 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Return on Investment 21537 2,719 3,315 39441 31828 40001 41183 24 Incr in Working Cep 0 0 0 308 220 206 198 25 TOTAL NON-OPER EXP $12,400 $109523 $12,369 $14,437 816,377 $17,671 $189787 26 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 875,659 078,121 $81,881 $860098 8919675 $969812 $102,065 2222saa 2222222 9229222 922axos 2222222 •22222• 2,,222• 27 NET GAIN (LOSS) (81,074) $50195 $1,940 $5,493 $5,604 $5,674 85,035 28 DEBT SERV COVERAGE 1.96 2.84 2.28 2.59 2.36 2.41 2.34 E-3 ( ,i 12-May-88 UTILITY SYSTEM PRO FORMA CHANCES 15:18:00 i PROJECTED GROWTH 1.7% 2.7% 3.5% 4.1% 4.2% - 3.8% REVENUES * 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 REVENUES Electric Sales ; 5.1% 2.6% 3.4% 4.7% 4.8% 7.1% Electric Misc ; 0.6% -14.1% 4.3% 5.7% 0.8% 4.1% Tmpa & Other Off Sys. ; 22.2% -16.2% 42.3% 1015% 8.4% -7.4% r' Water & W/W Sales ; 38.5% 7.1% 11.3% 8.7% 5.6% 5.9% Wttrr & W/W Misc i -31.5% -8.7% 4.4% -31.9% -28.1% -27.3% F--------------------------------------------- TOTAL REVS 0.6% 9.3% 6.2% 5.4%-----4.5% EXPENDITURES P SupplieB ersonal Services ; 17.5% 5.3% 9.6% 9.2% 9.2% -9.1% Purchase Pother & Fuel 41.9% 12.6% 3.5% 4.5X 4.12 4.7% 2.1% -016% 4.6% 4.6% 4.6% 4.62 Production Pother W/W ; 6.6% 442 -36.6% 511% 6.4% 5.2% C Maintenance ; 25.8% 30.5% 4.7% 4.4% 4.4% 4.8% Services ; 14.9% 30.2% 3.4% 4.6% 4.0% 4.5% Purchase Water -0.2% -32.0% -84.2% -7.9% 010% 0.0% P Ins & Sundry ; 79.1% 78.5% 3.1% 4.8% 3.9% 4.0% } Bad Debts ; -61.9% 60.3% -47.7% 5.1% 5.1% 6.3% Administrative Trans ; -9.1% 3.0% 5.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Ray Roberts Pats ; NA 0.4% 0.2% 2.0% 2.0% 5.2% TOTAL OPER EXP 20.8% 11.4% -0.22 8.2% 6.32 6.62 - NON OPERATING EXPENDITURES Debt Service ; -4.12 13.2% 22.9% 20.92 3.92 S.iX C apital Improvesegts ; 120.5% 22.8% 7.1% 1.0% 25.7% 11.9% Other Return on Investment -100.0% NA NA NA NA NA 7.2% 21.92 3.8% 11.2% 4.5% 4.5% TOT 0.6X 1.1% 2.3X OP & NON OP EXP t 1-.8% E-4 ~t F t i 06-May-88 UTILITY SYSTEM BOND FUND ANALYSIS j 14:15:28 P (S X 10001 F Y BEGINNING Bonds Bonds Bonds ENDING Ending BALANCE Sold Available C'sed BALANCE 1987 $I6,811 s0 $16,871 S7,494 $9,377 1988 9,3)7 3,50D 12,877 11,197 11680 1989 1,680 13,500 1S,180 14,042 11139 1990 1,139 159350 16,489 15,401 11088 1991 11088 12,750 13,838 12,u1S 1,163 + 1882 1,163 80550 91713 8,577 11,135 1993 1,135 71000 80135 61910 t,225 06-May-88 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS - UTILITY 14115:28 (S X 1000) i Bond 8ND X FY FY FY FY FY ? Sales TERM 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 Series i 1983 $25,280 Act $39161 $3,040 529875 52,112 52,035 ! 19983 61100 1,094 11050 10471 1,356 1,242 0 Act 0 0 0 0 0 1986 0 0 0 0 1987 17,485 11165 10163 10165 1,414 11415 1988 3,500 Est 175 347 340 333 326 1989 13,500 8X/26 yr 675 11337 1,310 11284 11258 1990 15050 8%/25yr 0 768 11520 11489 11459 1991 121'750 8X/25 yr 0 0 638 1,262 11237 1992 811550 8X/26 yr 0 0 0 428 846 1993 7,000 8X/25 yr 0 0 0 0 350 1994 7,900 8X/25 yr 0 0 0 0 0 1995 811D0 8X/25 yr 0 0 0 0 0 1996 7,600 81,125 yr 0 0 0 0 0 1997 70900 82/25 yr 0 0 0 0 0 1998 7,850 8X/25 yr 0 0 0 0 0 j TOTAL $1480865 HI M $7,705 $9,317 $9,677 $10,169 NOTES All bonds are programmed to pay It principal in the first year, 2% principal in the 2nd thru 5th years and remaining principal 1s paid at the rate of 4.5% for the next 20 years. li-5 r - E { b's t~ 12-May-88 ELECTRIC SERVICE PROFOR14A 09:05:37 X 1000) f ACTUAL EST/ACT FY FY FY FY FY 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1 NET SALES (MWH) 695,240 722,083 735,317 753,701 777,060 800,372 8249389 2 Rev cents/KWH 7.53 7.62 7.68 7.75 7.87 8.01 8.32 REVENUES { 3 Residential =19,536 $20,729 $21,565 $29,298 $239346 $24,467 $26,204 4 Commercial 29,725 30,850 31,380 32,447 33,972 35,603 38,131 5 Government 2,709 39001 39621 %124 3,271 3,428 3,671 6 Other E1 Charges 318 54 55 57 60 63 67 7 TMFP Coverage Rot 5,624 6,100 6054 6,366 6,659 6,965 7,285 8 TMPP Surplus 1,525 1,567 0 0 0 0 0 Capacity 115351 578 876 ls30O 10000 800 600 85 2,859 2,375 5,577 6,978 8,102 60816 11 St/Highway Light 238 299 363 375 393 412 431 12 Interest (Oper) 418 700 679 696 729 764 799 13 D-D Fees 89 106 100 103 IOd 113 118 14 Collection Chg Off 0 8 8 8 8 8 15 Reconnect Fees 18 20 20 21 22 23 24 8 16 Aid In construction 101 142 145 150 157 165 173 17 Cust Connect Fees 200 302 309 320 335 351 367 18 Temporary Service 47 64 63 65 68 71 74 19 Meter Tampering 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 20 Service Center Rents 164 156 160 165 173 181 189 21 Sale of Scrap 1 i 5 5 6 5 6 22 House Moves 1 I I I 23 Mime Income 142 28 29 30 31 32 33 24 Interest Inc(Non-op) 455 400 140 166 191 131 128 25 TOTAL REVENUES $63,255 167,974 $67,353 $73,279 $77,51Y $81,690 $85,128 EXPENDITURES 26 Personal Services $4,0.1 $4,731 $4,981 $5,464 $5,994 $4,581 $7,213 27 Supplies 234 354 382 393 413 434) 447 28 Maintenance 1,064 11374 2,041 21135 2,233 2,336 2,443 29 Services 1,92 $16 809 833 875 910 946 30 Ins B Sundry 253 441 887 914 967 998 11038 31 Bad Debt 555 381 560 290 303 318 340 32 Admin Transfers 10447 1,228 1,265 11328 1,381 1,436 194P3 SUBTOT O&M $8,116 $9,125 $10,926 $119357 $12,159 $13,009 $13,920 33 Purchase Pow k Fuel $47,139 $48:131 $41,830 $50,030 $52,331 $54,'is8 $570256 - NET OPER REVENUES $8,000 $10,718 $8,598 $11,892 $13,022 $13,943 $13j952 CAP AND OTHER NON OPER EXPENSES 34 Fixed Assets $554 $893 $1,313 $1,596 $1,511 $2,131 $2,468 35 Debt Service 3,224 31192 31269 39638 4,306 4,373 4,662 36 Other 11400 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 get On Inv Trans .,767 10890 10955 21053 21156 2,264 2,377 38 Incr in Working Cap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 TOT NON OPER EXP $6,945 -$5,975 -$5,537 $7,297 $7,973 $8,768 +$9,507 40 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 62,200 63,231 65,29[ 68,674 72,463 78,516 80,683 =aazaz zzzzza zzzacz Sias:: z1szza :czars a"azzz 41 NET GAIN (LOSS) $1,055 $4,743 $2,061 $4,605 $59049 $5,173 $4,445 42 DEBT SERVICE (c/kwh) 0.46 0.44 0.44 0.48 0.65 0.555 0.57 43 DEBT SERV COVERAGE 2.48 3.36 2.63 3.27 3.02 3.19 2.99 E-6 f t 1 T l 1 t ~ e 12-May-88 10:06:30 ELECTRIC SERVICE PRO FORMA PROJECrED GROWTH(%) 1.3% -2.4%- 3.4% 4.71 4.8% 4.6% 1988 * REVENUES 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 Residential , - 0".-0X 0-.--0% O-.--OX Commercial O.OX 0-.-01 2,~1 . Governs ; 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% O.C% 0.0% f 5X Other E1 Salsa ; 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% Other (earned) i 0.0% 0. 0.0% 0.0% 0 Inter 2.5% O.OX .0% OX 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% O.OX TOTAL REVENUES 0 .0X 1.7X 1988 1989 1990 1991 --""-1--._ EXPENDITURES Personal 11393 services S.OX Supplies i L 0% S.OX 5.0X 5.0% 5.0% ----5.0% Purch Power and Fuel 1.0% 3.0X 5.0% 4.0% 4.0% Maintenance 2.1X -0.6% 4.6X 4.6X 4.6X 4.61 Services 1.0% 1.0% 3.0% 5.0% 4.0% 4.0% ` Ina* 6 Sundry i 1.0% 1.0% 3.0% 5.0% 4.OX 4.pX ' Bad Debts * ' 1.0% 1.0% 3.0% 5.0% 4.0% 4.0% Ads Trans 4 ~ -15.1X 47.0% -48.2% 4.5% 5.0% 6.9% 5.0% 4, 3- -OX 4.0% 4.0% TOTAL OPER EXp 1.4X ~ 1.9X i ' 3.6% 4.9X 4.3% CAP 8 O'iH NON OPER 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1986 Fixed Assets * Debt Service * 137.0% 47.0% 21-6% -5.3% 1 41.02 15.8% Other .4X 11.3% 18.4% 1.6% 6.6% 7.3% ReL on Inv Trans -100.0% NIA 4X N/A N/A N/A NSA i LOX 50% OX 5.0% TOT TOT CAP f OTH NON OP EX . ; ~ 98.5X 20.6% 15.0% 0.4% 17.6% 9.4% - * Representa percent increase or decrease over previous year. y E-6a i r' ~ T Y I N 1 r 1 f i 06-May-88 ELECTRIC BOND FLND ANALYSIS 1 14:15:28 i (S 1 10001 F Y BEGINNING Bondy Bonds Bonds ENDISt Ending BALANCE Sold Available L'sed BALANCE ` - I - 1987 $7,890 $0 $7,890 $2,528 $5,362 1988 5,362 0 5,362 4,682 680 1989 680 `q 4,680 41646 34 1990 5,534 5,404 130 1991 130 6,c50 6,380 6,275 105 1992 105 41250 4,355 4,333 2 f 1993 2 41250 4,252 4,105 141 I 06-May-88 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS - ELECTRIC 14:15:28 IS X 10001 Bond 1NT % EST/ACC FY FY fl Fe Sales Term 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 Series 1983 $16,432 Act 52054 $1,976 511869 $ 1073 51,323 1984 2,108 Act 480 457 657 606 555 1985 0 0 0 0 0 p 1986 0 0 0 0 0 0 1981 8,026 Act 535 535 535 649 650 1988 0 0 0 0 0 0 1989 '4,000 SX/25yr 200 396 388 380 373 1990 6,500 811/25yr 0 275 545 534 523 1991 6,250 8%/25yr 0 0 313 619 606 1992 4,250 8%/25yr 0 0 0 213 421 1993 4,250 8X/25yr 0 0 0 0 213 r; 1994 4,500 8%/25yr 0 0 0 q p 1995 4,850 8%/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 1996 5,000 8%/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 t 1991 4,750 8%/25yr 0 0 D 0 0 1998 5400 8%/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 6759515 $3,269 83,638 $4,306 $4,373 54,662 NOTE: All bonds are programmed to pay 11 principal in the first year, i 2% principal In the 2nd thru Sth years and remaining principal is paid at the rate of 4,5% for the next 20 years, E-7 s ELECTRIC SERVICE COST ANALYSIS i 12-May-88 X 1000) 09:06,18 1987-88 % OF COSTS 1988-89 X OF COSTS COSTS TOTAL C-)nts/KWH COSTS TOTAL Cents/KWH COSTS cosTa , 0 A K EXPENSE Personal Services $4,731 E.98% 0.66 64,981 9.05% 0.68 Supplies 354 0.67% 0.05 382 0169% 0.05 Maintenance 11374 2.61% 0.19 29041 3.71% 0.28 Services 616 1.17% 0.09 809 1,47% 0.11 Other 441 0.84% 0.06 887 1.61% 0.12 Bad Debt 381 0.72% 0.05 680 1.02% 0.08 Ads Trans ---1.228 - 2.33% • 0.17 11265 2130% 0.17 TOTAL 01M EXP $90125 17.31% 1.26 $91125 18.67X 1.49 Purchased Energy • Power n ' (net cost) $37,605 71.35% 6421 $39,401 71.56% 5,36 CAPIT AND OTHER NON OPER EXP Fixed Assets $893 1169% 0.12 61,313 2.38% 0.18 On 3,192 6.06% 0.44 Debt n Inv 3.59% 0.26 39269 5.94% 0.44 3.65% 0.27 Incr in Work Cap 0 0.00% 0.00 0 0.00% 0.04 TOT NON OPM EXP $60976 11.34% 0,83 $6,637 11.87% 0.89 .i 1. sssssssss[ ss:ssss :22:222 ssstsssss 28:9:8: sss:era TOTAL EXPENDITURES $52,105 100.00% 7130 655,063 100.00% 7149 r ' MWH SALES 722,083 735,317 r. E- 8 If N 06-May-88 COMBINED WATER 6 M'ASTEWATER PROFORNA y 14:15:28 (S X 10001 ACTUAL ES1ACT F1, F1 FY REVENUES F,1 --19988 --1969 1940 1 1991 1593 ~ 1 Residential water $3, 2 Commercial Water 491 2,247231 $4,,384471 $4,,833339 !54 ,002 4,648 491 55,177 $5,358 E5,529 - 4,1611 942 4,955 3 4 ' 3 Resale water 407 467 4 Other water 323 498 518 11295 19489 1,097 1,952 S Noa Oper Water Rev 318 175 298 323 $33 210 366 374 6 Res, Wst,Wtr. Fees 10781 1,917 1955 233 66 40 52 7 CONN. Wst,Wtr, Fees 2,030 3,180 3,499 30979 2'496 2,733 2,952 8 whole. Wst.Wtr. Fees 136 18B 203 40467 4.891 5,282 9 Other Wat,Wtr, Fees 135 532 508 233 262 287 310 10 Non Oper Wat,Wtr. Rev 186 170 105 96 158 1 446 471 121 492 311 - 01 11 TOTAL REVENUES ° ' $11,330 $15,342 $16,468 $18,312 $19,767 120,796 $21,972 EXPENDITURES 12 Personnal Services $20698 $3,222 $3,397 53,715 54,025 $4,361 !4,725 13 Supplies 349 473 14 Production Power 11046 1,117. 11170 771 544 618 650 42 $30 873 780 15 Maintenance 970 1,185 1,299 1,363 114118 10473 10551 16 Purchase Water 829 821 w 17 Services 429 562 89 82 82 82 1 614 839 672 18 Insurance and Sundry 72 1.411 1552 1551 19 Bad Debt 608 62 150 181 162 168 175 87 92 20 Adsin Transfers 1,003 998 11028 11079 1,11 2 1,161 1,296 21 Ray RoLerts Pmts 0 1,875 10682 11888 11924 1,962 2,064 22 TOTAL EXP !8,004 !10,942 !10 A57 ` !10,274 5100808 $11,394 $12,102 NET OPER REVS 83,326 $5,000 !5011 58038 $8'-959 !9-, - -402 1 599,8+0 - ,870 r CAP AND OTHER NON OPER EXPENSES 23 Fixed Assets $474 81,374 $1 471 24 Debt Service : !1,387 !1,101 !1,636 S1,770 26 Other 20551 2,343 3,001 4,967 50011 5,304 5,506 26 Ret on Inv Tr 1+660 0 0 0 0 27 lncr in n Tr n Cap 77o 829 1,360 11388 11672 1,737 1,806 0 0 308 220 206 198 28 TOT NON OP£R EXP 55,455 $4,948 $5,832 $1,130 $8,404 $8,903 $9,280 29 TOT OPER/NON OPER EXP 813,459 $14,890 $16,S89 $17,424 $199212 $20,297 $21,382 aaasaa aasaaa 111011 aaaaas saaasa 111:11 saeasa 30 NET GAIN (LOSS) 1!2,129) $452 (!1211 $888 1355 $499 $590 31 DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE 1.30 2.13 1,90 1,98 1.19 1,77 1.79 J~ E-.g yf , f i 06Kay-88 14: 15:28 WATER/WASTEWATER PROFORMA CHANGES r 24 t( PROJECTED GROWTH 2.0% 3-OX - 3.5% 3,5X REVENUES 1988 = 1989 Residential water 1990 1991 1992 1993 Commercial water ; 10.6% 3.5% .-•.3.5X Resale Water 4L2X 12.9% 3,5X 3.5% 3.0% Other Water 14.7% 10,92 150.0% 3'5% 3•5X 3.0% Non Operating $4.2% -40,2% 1S,OX 14.0% 15,0% Res. Wst,Wtr, -45-OX 20.0% 8.4z 65-OX -31.3% 2.2% Y; Fees 11.0% Come, Wst,Wtr, Fees 2.O% 13.5% -39.4% 30.0% 7.8% l2.5X Whole. Wst,Wtr, Fees 56'7% 10.0% 13.5% 12,5% 9'5% 8.0% Other Wst,Wtr. Fees 38'2% 8.0% 14.8% I2 g'SX 8.0% Non Oper Wst-Wtr. Revs ; 294.1% -4.5% -11,6% .4X 915X 8.0% _ 4,9% 4,5% -8.6X 38,2% -8.6% 64.6% -23.4% -46.3% TOTAL REVENUES " 35.4% -7,3% 11.2% 7.9% 5.2X EXPENDITURES -----1988_- 1989---_'199Q--I---y-----------------5-7X Personnal services 91 1992 1993 Supplies 29,4% 5.4% 9.4% 8.3% . F Production Power ; 3 18'1% 4.0% 4.Ox 84-.OX3% 58.3X Maintenance 6,8% 4.7% _ 2% Purchase water 22.2% 9. CZ 34,9% S. IX 6,4% 5.2% Services ' •0-2X -32.0% -8 4.0X 4.0% 5 .2X Insurance aid Summary 93.00% 28.5% 410% 3.9% 0.0% 0.0% j Bed Debts 7,8% 4.1% 5.2% Adsin Transfers -89.8% 141.9% -4810% 312% 317% 402% Ray Roberts pets '0'52 3,0X 7'4% 5,7% 4,3% N/A 5.OX 410% 4.01 4,OX 0......................... 4% 0,22 2.0% 2.0% TOTAL OPER EXP 3.2% 29.2%.-_-+4.0X-----4.5%5,2X--5,4%.......... 6.2% CAP1T AND OTHER NON OP 1988 1989 1990 Assets 990 1991 1992 1993 Debt Service 189.9% - ~ 7, 1% -5,72 A,2X l0,3X Other -8.1% 28.0% 35,5% 23.2% 6.9% r Rat on Inv Trans -100,0% N/A N/A N/A 5.8% 3.8% N/A 6 NON OP EXP !_.----7--x----84-1X. 2.1% 20.5% N3 A9% 4.0% TOT OF f ; 10.6% 11.4% S -Ox ,02 10.3% S,6X 5.3% , ~I E-10 .i i 1 r n 06-May-88 COMBINED WATER AND WASTEWATER BOND FUND ANALYSIS 14;15:28 IS t 10001 F Y BEGINNING Bonds Bonds Bonds ENDING Ending BALANCE Sold Available Used BALANCE 1987 $8,981 $0 38081 $4,966 $4,015 1988 41015 3,500 1,515 61515 11000 1989 19000 90500 20,500 90396 11105 1990 1,105 9,850 10,955 91997 958 1991 958 61500 70458 69400 11058 1992 1,058 41300 5.358 41224 11133 1993 1,133 2,750 3,883 29805 11078 S ti r~ 06-May-88 WATER $ WASTEWATER DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS 14:15:28 (4 X 1000) Bond EST/AC': FY FY FY FY i Series Bales 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 f 1983 $8,848 $1,106 $1,064 11,006 $739 $112 i 1984 3,393 $15 593 813 750 687 1985 0 0 1986 0 0 0 0 0 0 1987 9,459 630 630 630 765 766 1988 30500 175 341 340 333 326 ' 1989 91500 475 941 922 903 885 1990 9,850 0 493 975 956 937 1991 61500 0 0 325 644 631 1992 4,300. 0 0 U 215 426 k 1993 2,750 0 0 0 0 138 1994 3,400 0 p 1995 31250 0 0 0 0 0 1996 2 600 0 0 0 0 p " 1997 3j 150 0 0 0 0 0 1598 21850 0 0 0 0 0 - TOTAL 173,350 $30001 $41067 $5011 $5,304 $5,506 NOTE: All bonds are programed to pay 1% principal In the first ye$r 2% principal in the 2nd thru 5th years and remalhing principal is paid at the rate of 4.5% for the next 20 years. i t" t 1 06-!Say-88 ( 14:14:52 WATER SERVICE PRUFURVA X 1000) i ' ACTUAL EST/ACT F1' FY FY FY F1 1987 1988 1930 1990 1991 1992 1993 1 DENTON SALES EVIL GALS) 3,617 -4,267 4,41I f 2 DENTON CL'ST REV/1000 GALS 31887 3,926 3,982 4,122 $1.67 $2.15 $2.37 $2, 3 RESALE SALES (MIL GALS 340 219 42 $2.42 $2.42 $2.10 4 RESALE CLST S/1000 GALS 353 513 108 810 938 $2.20 51,61 $1.47 $2.11 52.10 $2.09 $2.03 S TOTAL SALES .4 ,017 ;,266 ° - 6 TOTAL REV/1000 GALS $1.63 4'219 40 4,829 Si 38 36 52.12 52.29 $ 522..38 $ 522..37 37 $2 52..36 $2.353 333 REYENL'ES Residential 53,?il 540371 $4,833 8 Commercial $5,002 $5,171 $5,358 65,519 2,123 3,844 4,339 40491 41648 41811 41953 9 Resale 407 467 518 1,295 1,489 1,697 1052 10 Intra;overnaentai 123 131 124 11 Tap Fees 139 246 32 37 1 49 128 180 194 196 I 12 Pro Rata 13 32 77 180 94 96 13 Aid In Construction 5 ISO 35 0 0 0 U 14 Sale of scrap/FA 3 3 49 77 180 94 g6 15 Interest Incoae(Oper) 5 7 7 3 3 3 3 16 Misc income 5 29 7 3 17 Interest Inc(Noa-op) 318 31 31 31 31 31 175 210 233 66 40 52 18 TOTAL REVENUES 17,062 59055 510,198 $11,344 !11013 512,272 $12,852 EXPENDITURES } 19 Personal Services SI,418 32,072 $1,754 51,921 $2,084 52,261 12,453 q 20 Supplies 251 IS 339 353 21 Production Power 367 382 402 22 Lewis Hydro Expenses 590 0 605 20 S4 56 620 254 269 291 306 23 Maintenance 38 60 24 Purchased Water 821 769 765 816 849 883 38 25 Services 829 E21 562 89 82 82 g2 2 -26 Insurance and Sundry 235 289 283 236 249 288 268 89 27 Bad Debt 365 42 93 4 86 89 8 50 92 96 53 28 Adaln Transfers 52 31 29 Ray Roberts Pais 612 6n1 619 650 616 703 731 { -0 _10615 -1.882 -1,886 _1`97.4 -1.962 `2,064 i{ 30 TOTAL EXPENSES $1,930 $7,505 57,014 $6,399 . _ $6,691 17,021 17,444 31 NET OPER REVS $2,132 $1,850 53 184 CAPIT AND OTHER NON OPER EXPENSES ' 14,945 $5,222 88,251 15,408 32 Fixed Assets 33 Debt Service $387 0866 $876 $836 $850 $984 5963 3 3 Debt rv_ 1,531 10408 11852 2,622 3.146 3,123 3,135 35 Ret On Inv Trans 946 0 U U 36 lncr in Working Cap 4602 482 611 658 797 U 4 0 0 815 834 _ 181 67 . 37 TOT NON OPER $3 376 43 $2,756 $3,399 $4,297 14,880 15015 15,026 38 TOT OPEP/NONOpER EXP $8,308 $10,261 $10,413 $10,698 $11,571 312,036 $12,470 a222ts ■e2ae■ !:feat 492222 damage sasses --X2229 39 NET GAIN(LOSS) (18-38) ($1444) (3906) (5215) $648 8342 $236 $382 40 DEBT COST/100OGAL(33/5) $0.380 50.340 $0.430 $0.570 $0.650 $0.620 $0.590 41 DEBT SER COV (31/33) 1.39 1.32 1.72 1.89 1.66 1,64 1,72 V-12 J I N i 06-May-88 WATER SERVICE PROFORMA CHANGES 1405:28 PROJECTED GROWTH lXl 2,0% 3 OX 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.0X r 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 REYENLES - Residential ; 8.5% 8.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1 Commercial 815% 8.5% 0.01 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Regale 8.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Other Sales 0.0% 8.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.01 0.0% Non Operating ; 010% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% TOTAL REVENLES ; 5.1% 5.1% 010% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 EXPENDITURES + Pergonnal Services w 46.1% -15.3% 9.5% 8.5% 8.5% 8.5% ' t Supplies ; 110% 3.0% 5.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Production Power + 4.3% 7.4% -60.0% 3.5% 8.2% 512% j Maintenance ; 1.0% 3.0% 5.0% 4.0% 4,0% COX ~ Purchased Water 6.5% -5.3X 3.2% 3.1% 3.8X 2.9% Services LOX 3.0% 5.0% 4,0% 4.OX 4.0% Insurance and sundry ; 8.0% 3.0% 5.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Bad Debts • -88.5% 121.4% -48,4% 4.2% 4.0% 119% Admin Transfers t -0.2% 3.0% 5.0% 4.02 4.01 4.0% TOTAL OF EXP • 9.3X- -0.2% -3.9X-•---4.4%.•• 5. .2% 4.7% 1988 1389 1990 1991 1992 1993 CAP A 0TH NON OPER EXP ' Fixed Assets ; 124.3% 0.9% -4.6% 1.7% 15.8% -2.1% Debt Service s ; -8.2% 31.7% 41.6% 20.0% -0.7% 0.4% Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Ret On Inv Trans t ; 4.3% 39.2% -1.9% 21.1% 2.4% 2.2% ! + TOT CAP 8 0TH NON OF EXP ; 40,2% 24.0% 11.7% 14.3% 5.8% 0.2% = Represents percent increase or decrease over previous year. .i i E-13 t< i s 1 ~ j 06-May-88 WATER BOND FLND ANALYSIS 14t14:52 is X 1000) F Y BEGINNING Bonds Bonds Bonds ENDING Ending BALANCE Sold Ava.lable Used BALANCE 1987 $5,822 $0 $5o822 $3,982 $1,840 l988 1,840 2,500 4,340 3,840 500 1989 500 61500 7,000 6,492 509 1990 509 71250 71159 71317 442 1991 442 1,750 29192 1,672 520 1992 520 800 19320 844 476 1993 476 19250 11726 11170 556 s s 06-May-88 WATER DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS 1+:1!:28 X 1000) : K Bond INT % FY FY FY FY FY Sales Term 1989 1990 1991 1932 1993 Series 1983 $5,309 Act $664 $638 1604 $443 $427 1984 11496 Act 360 352 485 448 410 1985 0 0 0 0 0 0 1986 0 0 0 0 0 0 1987 5,676 Act 378 378 318 459 459 1988 21500 Eat 125 248 243 234 233 1989 6,500 ,8X/25yr 325 644 631 618 $06 1990 7,250 8X/25yr 0 363 718 703 689 1991 1,750 8X/25yr 0 0 88 173 170 1992 800 82/25yr 0 0 0 40 79 1,14 1993 1,250 8%/25yr 0 0 0 0 63 1994 10400 8%/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 1995 1,250 $%/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 1996 11000 8%/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 1997 I,S00 8%/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 1998 1,250 6%/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL $39,430 fI,852 $2,622 331146 (3,123 (3,136 NOTE: All bonds are programmed to pay 1% principal in the first year, 2% principal in the 2nd thru S!h years and remaining principal is paid at the rate of 4.5% for the next 20 years. G-14 r i t I 06-May-88 WATER SERVICE COST ANALYSIS 14:15:50 X 1000) 1987-88 X OF COST PER 1980-89 % OF COST PER COSTS TOTAL 1000 GAL COSTS TOTAL 1000 GAL COSTS COSTS 0 8 M EXPENSE Personal Services $2,072 20.19% $0.53 $1,754 16.88% :0,45 Supplies 336 3.27% 0.09 339 3.26% 0.09 Maintenance 769 7.49% 0.20 185 7.55% 0.20 Services 289 2,82% 0.07 227 2,18% 0.06 E Other 89 0.87% 0.02 83 0.80% 0.02 Bad Debt 42 0,41% 0.01 93 0.89% O.U2 Adb Trans 601 5.86% 0.15 619 5.96% 0.16 Ray Roberts 1,875 18.27% 0.48 11882 18,11% 0.48 TOTAL O&M EXP $6,073 59,19% $1.56 $5,782 55.63% $1.4- t Production Power $605 5.90% 0116 $650 6.25% 0.17 Purchased Water 827 8106% 0.21 562 5.41% 0.14 SUBTOTAL 11,432 13,96% $0.37 $1,212 11.66% $0,31 CAP AND OTHER NON OPER EXP E Fixed Assets 1868 8.46% 0.22 $876 8.43% 0.22 Debt Service 10406 13.70% 0.36 11852 17.82% 0.47 Ret on Inv Trans 482 4,10% 0.12 611 6.46% 0.17 Incr in Work Cap 0 0.00% 0100 0 0.00% 0.00 TOTAL NON OP$R EX $2,756 26.86% 80.71 $39399 32.102 $0.87 I a TOTAL EXPENDITURES •$10,251 100,00% $2.64 $10,393 100.00% $2.65 r. +r i MILL GAL SALES 3,887 3,926 I P"I E-15 r t I k 06-May-88 WASTEWATER SERVICE PROFORMA. I 14:15:28 IS X 1000) ACTUAL EST/ACT FY FY FY F1' FYe ` 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 f ITOTAL ASti COST BILLS 190,450 194,259 200,087 207,090 214,338 221,810 228,195 2 RES ANN Cust Bills 163,578 166,e5O 171,655 177,810 184,095 190,539 196,255 3 AV MTH Bill/Res 14/2) 10.89 11,49 11,38 12.48 13.56 14.34 15,04 REVENUES 4 Residential Fees 51,781 $1,917 $1,955 52,219 $2,496 $2,733 52,952 5 CommArcial Fees 2,030 3,180 3,499 31971 4,467 4,891 5,282 6 Wholesale Fees 136 188 203 233 262 287 310 7 Intragov Fees 61 63 63 72 81 89 96 0 Coliform Analysis 12 8 8 8 9 10 It 9 Tap Fees 25 75 50 0 0 0 0 " 10 Line Extensions 0 40 30 0 0 0 0 11 Aid lu Construction 5 32 36 36 36 36 36 12 Industrial Water 27 45 44 46 48 50 52 13 Other wastewater 0 269 277 281 297 307 316 ` 14 Interest Inc (Oyer) 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 15 Interest Inc (Non-oper) 186 170 105 96 158 121 65 Id TOTAL REVS $4,288 $59987 $6,270 $6,968 !7,854 $8,524 $9,120 EXPENDITURES 17 Personal Services 51,280 $1,150 81,643 $1,794 $1,941 $2,100 $2,212 18 Supplies 98 137 210 218 227 236 248 r-\ 19 Production Power 466 512 520 482 511 539 567 20 Lewis Hydro Expeises 0 0 20 54 56 58 60 21 Maintenance 319 416 474 493 $13 534 562 j 22 Services 200 153 341 355 369 384 404 ~ 23 Ins and Sundry 37 52 69 11 13 to 79 24 Bad Debt 243 20 57 33 37 40 43 25 Adain Transfers 401 397 409 429 446 '464 483 26 TOTAL EXPENSES $3,074 $2,837 $3,143 $3,929 $4,173 $4,431 $4,718 27 NET OF OPERATIONS 51,194 $3,150 52,527 $3,039 $3,681 $4,093 $4,402 CAP AND OTHER NON OPER EXPENSES 28 Fixed Assets 387 $506 $595 $551 $651 5672 $807 29 Debt Service 1,020 939 1,149 11445 11865 2,181 [,370 30 Other Expenditures 664 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Ret On Inv Trans 308 347 R89 730 875 921 972 32 Incr in Working Cap 0 0 0 121 133 114 105 33 TOT NON OPER EX? $2,079 81,792 $2,433 $2,853 33,524 $3,888 34,254 34 TOT OP 8 NON OP EXP $5,153 84,629 $6,179 $8,782 $79697 $8,319 $8,912 22 aa2a ■2a2as 222222 22x222 r12222 222222 222222 35 NET GAIN (LOSS) 118-341 ($883) $1,358 $94 $186 $157 6205 $148 36 DEBT SERVICE PER MONTHLY RESIDENTIAL BILLING $6.24 $5.63 $6.69 $8.12 $10.13 $11.45 $12.08 e 37 DEBT SERV COY (27/29) 1.17 3.35 2.20 2.10 1.97 1.88 1.86 E-16 a I E r1 06-Nay-88 WASTEWATER SERVICE PROFORMA CHANGES 14:15:28 PROJECTED GRCWTH " 2.0X 3.0Z 3.5% 3.5% 3.5x 3.0% - ---REVENUES 1988 * 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 Reaidentiel Fees , 0.0% 0.0% IO.OX 9,0% 6.0% 5.01 Commercial Fees ; 010% 0.01 10.0% 9.0% 6,0% 5.0% Wholesale Fees 0.0% 0.0% 10.OX 9.0% 6.0% 5.0% Intragov Fees Other Wet. Wtr, Fees ' 0.0% O.C% 10.0% 9.0% 6.0% S.OX Non Oyer Revs O,OX 0.0% 0.0% 5.0% 6,0% 5 0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% O.OX TOTAL REVENLES ' O.OX 0.0% 617% 6.8% 5.0% 4.2% ,2X EXPENDITURES 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 z Personal Services s ; 010% 42.91 9.2% 8.2% 8.21 8.2X s e~ Production Polder ' 010% 3.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4,0% Maintenance 0•0% 810% 8.0% 810% 810% 810% Services 0.0% 3.0% 4.0% 410% 4.0% 4.0% Ins and Sundry ' 0.0% 310% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0X 4.0% Bad Debt 185.0% -42,1% 12.1% 8.1% 7.3X Admin Transfers e i ~ . -LOX 3.0% 4,9% 4.0% 410% 4.1% t 4----------°_.._.-•....--"'-'----------...... TOTAL OP E%P9 - 0.0% 10.5% 5.5% 6.4X 5.4% 5.4% ,;X 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 CAP AND OTHER NON OPER E.XP 4 Fixed Assets a 981.6% 17.6% -1.4X 18,1% Debt Service t 3,2% 20.1% Other Expeditures s -7.9% 22,4% 25,8% 29.1% 16.9% 8.1% O Ret ther On Inv Trans ♦ ; 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.1% 98.6% 1.0% 19.9% 5.3% 5.5% . , 4........... TOT CAP 6 0TH NON OP EBP " " ' ---.62.......48-2X-----8-1x-'--22-4X_....8-5x--..11-4% s Represents percent increase or decrease over previous year. uP E-17 f~ 4 s i r^,' 06-May-88 WASTEWATER BOND FOND ANALYSIS 14:15:28 y(S X 10001 F Y BEGINNING Bonds Bonds Bonds ENDINO Ending B,3LANLE Sold Available i'sed BALANCE 1981 $3,159 $0 53,159 $984 $2,175 r 1983 2,115 11000 31175 21675 $00 1989 500 3,000 3,500 20904 596 1990 596 21600 31196 2,680 516 1991 528 4,760 5,265 4,728 538 7 1992 $38 31500 4,038 3,380 658 1993 658 10500 2,158 1,635 523 {i 06-May-88 WASTEWATER DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS 14:15:28 11 X 10001 < Bond Int % FY FY FY FY FY } Sales Term 1989 1 Series 1990 1991 1992 1993 ..1990 i 1983 53,539 Act $443 1426 5403 $296 $283 1984 1,397 Act 254 241 321 302 276 1485 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 1986 0 0 0 0 0 0 1987 3,784 Act 252 252 252 306 306 1988 11000 Est 50 9S 97 95 93 { 1989 2,000 81/25yr 150 297 291 285 280 1990 21660 8%/25yr 0 130 257 252 247 1991 4,750 8%125yr 0 0 238 470 461 1992 3400 8%/25yr 0 0 0 175 347 1993 1,500 8%/25yr 0 0 0 0 75 " 1994 21000 8% 25yr 0 0 0 0 0 1995 2,000 81/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 1996 1400 8%/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 {d 1997 1450 81/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 1998 1400 8%/25yr 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL $33,920 $1049 11,445 11,865 62,1A1 321310 NOTE: All bonds are programs-d to pay 1% principal in the first year, 22 principal in the 2nd thru Sth years and remainin r paid at the rate of 4.5% for the next 20 yearn, 4 principal is F-18 w r ; car '4 ' ( I 1 06-May-88 WASTEWATER SERVICE COST ANALYSIS 14:15:28 SE X 10001 h 1987-88 X OF MONTHLY 1988-89 % OF MONTHLY COSTS TOTAL COST PER COSTS TOTAL COST PER 0 4 M EXPENSE - COSTS CUSTOMER - COSTS CUSTOMER } - Peraonnl Serv 511150 24.84% $5.92 $1,643 26.69% $8.21 Supplies 137 2.96% 0.71 210 3.41% 1.05 Maintenance 416 8.99% 2.14 474 7.70% Services 37 153 3132% 0.79 341 5.54% 1.70 I Other 52 1.12% 0.27 69 1.12% 0.34 Bad Debt 20 0.43% 0.10 57 0.931 0.28 Ads Trans 397 8.58% 2.04 j 409 6.64% 2.04 - c` SUBTOTAL 0 k M $2,325 50,23% $11.97 $3,203 52.03% $16.01 Production Power $512 11.06% 2.64 $520 8.45% 2.60 TOTAL 0 6 M $2,637 61.29% $14.60 $3,723 -60.48% $28.61 CAP AND OTHER !SON OPER EXP Fixed Assets $506 10.93% $2.60 $596 9.61% $2.97 Debt Service 939 20.29% 4.83 1,149 18.66% 5. Ret on Inv Trans 341 7150% 1.19 689 11.191 3.44 Incr in Work cap 0 0.00% 0.00 0 0.00% 0.00 i t TOT NON OPER EXP $1,792 38.71% $9.22 $2,433 39.52% $12.16 } TOTAL EXPENDITURES , 14,629 200.00% $23.83 16,156 100.00% 830.77 ANN COST BILLS 194,259 200,087 E-19 ul ,s r 1 i i { r ' i ' O6-May-88 14: 15:28 UTILITY DEPARTMENT ANITICIPATED BOND SALES (S X 1000) F Y Electric Water Wastewater Bonds Bonds Total Ending Sales Sales Bonds Bonds Sales Sales 1998 s so $2,500 $1,000 $3,500 f" 1989 41000 6 500 3,000 F 1990 13,500 f 51500 71 ebb`' 2,600 15,350 ~ 1991 61250 11750 4,750 12,750 1992 4,250 800 31500 81550 1993 4,250 1,250 1,500 Total 124,250 -_1--- 517,550 115,350 557,150 4 " # Not included in totals, r I E-20 f ' i - r I I J 06-May-88 SOURCE OF FUNDS 3 14115:28 l$ b 10001 " ---BONA FUNDS ---------------CURRENT R£YENUES----------- Ending Electric water Waatewtr Total Ending Electric Water Wastewt Total F Y _ _F Y-- 1988 0 $4,682 $3,840 $2,675 $11,191 1988 y $893 $868 $506 $2,267 1989 41646 6,492 2,904 14,042 1989 1,313 876 595 2,784 1990 5,404 71317 2,680 15,401 1990 10596 836 551 2,983 1991 6,275 1,672 4,128 12,675 1991 1,511 850 651 3,012 1992 4,353 844 3,380 8,577 1992 21131 984 672 3,$87 t ' 1993 4,105 1,170 1,635 61910 1993 21468 963 807 4,238 { Total for Total for j FY 89-93 $24,783 $17,495 (15,327 $57,605, FY 69-93 $9,019 $4,509 $3,276 $16.804 1 43.0% 30.4% 26.6% 100.0% 53.7% 28,8% 19.5% 100.0% . y -F-Y--------AID IN CONSTRUCTION------ OTHER FUNDS F Y Ending Electric Water Wastewtr Total Ending Electric Water Wastewtr Total- 1988 $142 $150 $32 $324 1988 a also $91 $55 $256 1989 145 49 35 230 1989 44 17 52 113 1990 150 77 36 263 1990 130 11450 123 1,703 1991 137 180, 36 373 1991 155 19510 103 1,768 1992 165 94 36 295 1992 63 161 165 189 1993 173 96 36 305 1994 27 111 15 213 Total for Total for FY 89-93 $790 $496 $180 $1,466 FY 89-93 $419 $3,309 $518 $4,246 53.9% 33.8% 12,3% 100.0% 9.9% 77,9% 12.2% 100.0% t a Not included to totals. { E-21 . 4 P i N I , 06-NaY-BB UTILITY D£PAILMEST BOND FUND ANALYSIS 14:15:28 (t X 1000) Water Water Water Electric Electric Electric Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Used Available Sales F Y Ending Used Available Sales _ ------EO E3,840 54,340 $2,500 1988 • -54, '-682' ""$5, ~362- 6,492 $7,000 $6,500 4,646 4,880 4,000 1989 7,311 $70759 $7,250 51404 5,534 5,500 1990 6,250 1,672 $2,192 511750 1991 61275 6,380 t 4,355 4,250 844 11,320 $800 1992 4,353 $1,250 41252 41250 19170 11,726 1993 4,105 $17,495 $19,995 5170550 Total $24,783 $25,201 $249250 Total Total Total Wastewater Wastewater Wastewater Bonds Bonds Bonds Y Bonds Bonds Bonds Used Available-, -Sales p Used Available sales Ending $12,874 $3,500 $3,175 $1,000 511,197 1988 s .12,675 913,500 31500 31000 $14,042 515,180 1989 2,904 489 515,350 $1B, 1 2,680 3,196 2,600 $15,40 1990 $13,838 $12,750 .4,77,8 51266 4,150 $12,675 1991 $9,713 $8,550 i 31380 • 41038 30500 18,577 1992 s a,135 17,000 3 8 910 19635 21158 1,--- $ , 1993 ,835 $51,150 ; $57,605 $63,354 Total 115,327 $181158 $15,350 : Not included in totals, I t E-22 I t 4 i 1 1 06-Msp-88 LTIUrv DEPARTMENT 16;06:56 CLSTUMERS, CONSUMPTION A FINANCIAL DATA V ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT TREYS X 1000) f F Y Avg R----Total Sales--- Avg Rev Avg D S £Rated Ending Cust MWH Revs /KWH /KWH Change 1988 27,127 722,083 154,634 $0.0757 - 0,44_ ----N/A 1989 27,771 735,317 56,021 0.0762 0.44 0.002 1990 28,747 753,701 57,926 0.0769 0,48 0.00% 1991 30,191 777,060 60,649 0.0180 0.55 0100% G ` 1992 31,744 800,372 63,561 0.0794 0.55 0.00% 1993 33,332 824,389 68,073 0.0826 0.57 2.50% WATER DEPARTMENT [GAL 8 $ X 1000) Sales F Y Avg ,t ---Total Sales--- Avg Rev Avg D S £Rn ed Ending Cust GAL Rev /1000 9a1/1000 gal Change 1988 17,171 3,887 48,813 12.27 $0.34 N/A 1989 110600 39926 9,814 2.50 0.43 8.6% , 1990 18,216 3,982 10,916 2.74 0.57 010% 1991 180854 41121 11,446 2.78 0,65 0,0% 1992 19,514 4,267 12,003 2.81 0.62 0.0% 1993 20,197 41417 12,567 2,85 0.59 0,0% WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 1$ X 1000) F Y Avg / Ending • Residt RRevd'si Avg Rev DebtbSer ERated Cust's /Reg Cus /Re* Cus Change - - 1988 13,904 $1,917 111.49 $6.24 N/A f 1989 14,321 11955 11.38 5.63 0.0% 1990 14,822 2,219 12.48 6.69 10.0% k 1991 15,341 2,496 13.56 8.12 s.0% 1992 15,878 2,133 14.34 10.13 6.0% 1993 16,355 2,952 15.04 11.45 5.0% LJ E-23 } f I ti r 12-May-88 /-1 10:06:30 DEBT TO EQUITY ANALYSIS i5 X 1000) ELECTRIC WATER k WASTEWATER Fiscal Year Dollars Ratio Dollars Ratio Ending Debt : Equity Debt :Equity Deht : Equity Debt: Equity 1988 $22,102 : $491696 31 69 $22,373: $36,437 38 62 1989 $26,102 : $51,757 34 66 $31,873: $36,316 47 : 53 1990 $31,602 : $56,362 36 64 $41,723 s $37,204 53 47 1991 $37,852 : $61,411 38 : 62 $48,223: $37,759 56 44 1992 $42,102: $66,586 39 : 61 $52,523 : $38,258 58 : 42 1993 $46,352: $71,031 39 : 61 $55,273 : 538048 59 : 41 ; SYSTEM TOTAL r 1 Year Dollars Ratio t j Ending-- Debt-_---Equity- Debt: -Equity 1988 $44,475 : $86,133 34 : 66 1989 $57,975 : $889073 40 s 60 E 1990 $73,325: $93,566 44 1 66 1991 $86,075: $990170 46 : 54 9 1992 $94,625: $104,844 47 : 63 1993 $101,625 s 5109479 48 : 52 i i E-24 a ) f L-L 1 I i s s I !i ll~ I 1 y V I i l + Il~ I, r Ir M I N U T E S 0 FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITY r BOARD J ~ I f ~ llj] I M1. 1 { La1 . 4.~ y ~.I r A 1 i uT I r j ra~ J I { 4 I 1 I 1 fy, 4.! r ' PAGE I I DENTON MURLCIPAL UTILITIF; k PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD The following represents excerpts of officially approved minutes of the Denton Public Utilities Board, and set forth the deliberations regarding the Proposed 1989-1993 Utility Department Capital Improvements Plan and related issues. MINUTES PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD March 30, 1988 6. REVIEW UTILITY DEPARTMENT PROPOSED 1989-1993 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. (Nelson) E Nelson, Tullos and Ham presented a quick overview of the major projects anticipated for the Utility over the next five - During Tulloa' years. presentation, the question was raised by LaPorte as to who makes the determination of what facilities should be changed from overhead to underground, where they are from, and on what they base their decisions. Nelson explained the Beautification Committee is one of the committees that makes recommendations. He indicated the.e was a request to budget J2.5 million for this purpose. LaPorte stated that It does not make sense to put utility lines underground while at the same time, leaving advertising signs in place. Thompson indicated ti.e Utility should stay within the boundaries of what we have budgeted in the past or even i less--approximately 4300,000 over the five emphasized the Utility should hold to year period, ' He this amount and no more. Me. Joyce Pool, Executive Aide for Texas Instruments, was present at the meeting. Me. Pool's comments related primarily to road and traffic conditions about the city and concerns regarding the area around TI when shift changes occur. She was assured her comments would be relayed to the proper departments. The Board directed the Staff to refine the manual, review the projects, and return to the Board with a recommendation. EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MEETING April 13i 1988 17. RECEIVE FINAL UTILITY DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION. (Ham/TU11os/Neleon) A substantial amount of time was spent in discussing the proposed Development Guide Water and Sewer Lines. Because of the general feeling over the past year from City Council, Planning and Zoning and other City staff, regarding the importance of industrial development near the Airport, the Staff had suggested including water and sewer lines on the north side of the airport along Marech Branch Road, YP r ' PAGE 2 Mrs and Mrs. Gene Gamble, who live along north Bonnie Brae, appeared before the Board expressing substantial concern that Bonnie Brae was not included as a line and felt that the line on Bonnie Brae would serve Denton better than Branch Road. a line along Marsch f The Gambles expressed that they have lived within the city limts Of Denton 9 andisewer service for 28 years but still have not received water The Board expressed that there are ocher longtime residents in Denton who also do not have water and wastewater service. was noted that water and wastewater service isde Der,ton from the nearest water or sewer line by It in f residents desiring such services. evxtelopeendedrs or Nelson asked if 4500,000 per year Is appropriate for such lines. Thompson emphasized such exrenditures should be low as Possible, kept as Chew again reiterated that a stud those persons not y needs to be done to determine been annexed Into getting water and sewer service that have expressed a desire to hknowlwho Ethosen years or longer. Chew priorities on line Installations, persons are who determine Utility must make sure that what C Is done hew emphasized that the Interests of the general populace of the City oflDenton,the beat )1 s Worts expressed agreement with Chew, Thompson indicated a desire to know how we are going to spend 42,5 million need for a priority system, and the ' The Board directed staff ± Of Denton who do to develop a report of other citizens such a re ort be not h we water and sewer service and requested p available before they make a final decision on i the proposed Utility Depart..ant Capital Improvement Plan, The Board Is further concerned that there is no formal process 1 established for 'electing the development asked that the guide profects and requested eteif develop such guidelines. a task force be each guidelines. The B"1rd further boards established and a so t enc het all affected boaprocess. 9 !es could be included to this dectsfonmaking Nelson pointed out water rote Ied out the CIP as proposed indicates an 8-1/21 ncreas F we currently have are too low Nelson sif it tatedfs possible that rates explanation as to why the transfers to the CiW yes. We ~.LnecelwFunddare not in compliance with the Charter. Me noted that the water Department lost money in 1987 nds were transferred anyway, The Charter states but fupaid out of 'esse Nelson expressed this ROX is to is an issue ethat the Council would have to address for the Board, but he did note that it Isn neecece funds, look at the combined Utllity funds to compute Rol, ssary to No further action taken at this time. 5511Us2 I PAGE 3 Ile CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PRO RATA REIMBURSEMENT ANALYSIS. (Ham) At the Hoard's request, a review and analysis of the Utility pro rata program has been made. Staff is requesting guidance from the Board after review of the item. The attachments indicate that the expenditure of City of Denton funds for utility line capital improvement projects far exceeds i the dollar value of pro rata payments received, unless significant interest and commitment to obtained from the citizens involved prior to the installation of the utility line. ...i Since 1961, the City of Denton has installed at least 14 major capital improvement utility lines at various locations throughout the City of Denton. The Utility's investment in the lines total II 44,4660813.71. To date, city records indicate a total pro rate ' reimbursement of these CIP lines totaling 85,557.62, showing only 3 a 21 return on investment. Four utility lines which have been installed that did generate i, significant citizen interest and a higher percentage return of pro rata reimbursement than any recent installations have provided the Ranch Estates and Audra Lane water nd sewer lines. are analysis of the coat/reimbursement ratios ca these lines show they collectively generated a 691 return on investment. Ham pointed out lines that have shown significant lack of activity regarding tie one are as followar Year Line Total 4 value 1 1 Coat Recd Recd Reed 1 1961 Airport Water Line 4304,627 """'-1 '2 2 1982 Hickory Crk Outfall ,627 47,108 p1 2 2'1 0 0 0 3 1982 Cooper Crk Interceptor SS (above 4 1984 Woodrow Lane SS 11613) 99,174 ~0 3 141,633 0 0 0 5 1985 loop 288 21' Water Line 5920415 0 6 1985 Spencer Rd Water Line 0 0 7 1965 Payne Or Water Line 19,880 8,832 441 1 90,100 0 0 0 8 1906 8t School 14' WL Extension 800074 0 9 1986 Hwy 380 SS 117,166 6,054 51 3 10 1987 Airport Sane Sewer Line 75,407 0 11 1987 Loop 288 30' Water Line 579,861 0 0 12 1987 Loop 208 Eagle Or 18' S9 0 0 0 13 1988 Hinkle Or 24' San. sewer 153,162 0 0 0 144.246 0 0 0 TOTALS 44,466,813 85,537 21 12 Ham pointer out that only Audra Lane Water and Sewer Line and Ranch Estates Water Line and Sewer Line have shown a good return on investment, 691 for a total outlay of 305,297 with income of 4210,194 and 153 customsrs served. 5543Lt3 I~ PAGE 4 Chew stated that this raises the same question again. The Utility spends all that money on the CIP taking lines out and ao cite ties on. Laney stated we need to find out where our misjudgement is on approving these lines. Do we need to work out a planning procedure to make these figures look better? The Board asked Ham i his opinion. Ham indicated that he would suggest the City get a 50% commitment from citizens in the proposed area to tie on prior to building the line. Chew indicated his agreement that Denton needs to 9o this. Thompson also indicated agreement with this t concept. The utility must assure, before we spend the money, that the citizens in thst area will tie on. i f t No further action was trken on this item. ~ EXCERPT MINUTES PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD May 4, 1988 4. CONSIDER PROPOSED RATING FORM FOR SELECTING DEVELOPMENT GUIDE BALANCED GROWTH POLICY WATER AND SEWER LINES. Ham reviewed the following proposed six major rating concepts for selecting Development Guide water ane sewer line CIP projects 1) Existing Development 2) Development Potential in the Short Term ' 3) Economic Benefits to the City 4) Balanced Growth 51 Compact Growth b) Health, Safety and Environmental Considerations { a Thompson again commented on the Board's concern that :w indication is made in the rating form regarding the landowner's. willingness to pay their share. It would seem that the final f deciding factor could be whether or not the landowners would be willing to pay their share of the coat. Another concern to the UL'Iity needs to know who will be tying on prior to construction. The City has run a number of lines and no one has joined on,even yet. Ham stated these projects represent the main Lines to an area. The developer or landowner would run the linti internally in the development. Laney stated his previous objection to this policy remains and that is that engineering considerations are not addressed in the ranking document. It is possible for 4250,000 to be invested in an area which would cause a change in the pressure plane that might increase the need for an elevated tank. Where does that money come from?? Thompson agreed that the cost and the engineering considerations should become a part of the ranking document. S543Us4 F PAGE 5 Laney stated there could be embedded costs- costs that cause economic impact on the rest of the system or on the Utility system. For instances income derived from customers' sales does ser not offset that at all and the rest of the customers will be subsidizing. Ham assured the Board these considerations will be addressed in a revised ranking document. LaFocte made a motion to approve the ranking sheet concept, with the stipulation that the concern raised by Thompson, i.e., the number of people that are willing to participate become part of such ranking document. Harrell stated the ranking form could be used to cut requea,s to the top three to fours and at that point, go back to survey and see if landowners are interested. Ham indicated this is what the Utility Department plans to do. Thompson stated the engineering impact upon the system should be listed on the , ranking sheet as a negative value. Then when the final cut to 3 or 4 is made, final selection will be made using the criteria of how many are willing to commit to the system. LaForte stated he does not agree with the second part. This should come under the measure of economic benefit to the city, Nelson stated there may also be positives, For example, Marsh Branch Road and Bonnie Brae water lines tie two parts of Lr,a ` a water systems together. f Thompson commented that the Utility Director could make the initial ratings, then go to Pits then to the City Council for final approval. Ham indicated his staff will confer with Planning to revise the r; proposed ranking document to meet the Board's concerns. Thompson stated the City Manager needs to be involved in the process and also any affected boards. Laney expressed his concern that the point system appeared to be set up with items mainly of concern to Planning Department i issues not Utility concerns- . . Thompson commented that Ltility costs, payback, and engineering are Utility items that need to be built into the score. He emphasized that the Utility Department needs to be involved in the whole process. The Utility staff must take the lead in these issues Worts revised his previous motion and moved to approve the ranking sheet concept, with the stipulation that the concerns raised by Thompson, the number of people that are willing to participate, the costs payback, and the engineering impacts become a ;art of such ranking sheets Second by Frady. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. 5543Ut5 ,r_ i I V t PAGE 6 5. CONSIDER ANNEXED AREAS WHERE RESIDENCES, BUSINESSES OR DEVELOPERS HAVE NOT YET EXTENDED WATER AND SEWER LINES. Nelson introduced this item directing the Board's attention to the maps showing the interior part of the City. These areas are well served by water and wastewater facilities. However, there are outlining areas that may need attention. Many of these people have water, but no sewer, some by their own choice. Thompson stated the policy should be to gradually furnish those areas within the core city. Thompson indicated that service should be required and established for public health reasons. ! LaPorte agrees that the core city needs to be taken care, of f especially in areas where such installations will serve a substantial number of citizens. The City Manager indicated the total coat is J15 million to the I water/sewer department. 3 No further action was taken on this item. 6. RECEIVE FINAL UTILITY DEPARTMENT 1989-1993 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION. Nelson reviewed the CIP with the Board, The development water I a and sewer lines have been adjusted to simply place the money for such lines (45000000) into the budget$ without actually making any recommendations for the specific areas to be included for the Development Guide water and sewer line process. Thompson indicated he would like to have chew in attendance before voting on the CIP, and requested staff to defer this decision. a Nelson noted that the Staff and Board are aware of the Gambles' i concern for their areas To the east and south of themo there is no capability of extending to the Gambles' propertyf on the west side, the Razors have no interest in developing now. An alternative for the Bonnie Brae and Marsh Branch lines would be I to partially construct both systems. On Bonnie Brae, we could bring the lb' water line and sewer line from Windsor down across the Smith.and Gamble property, This would furnish sewer to the Gamble property, The cost of the water line is appro%imately f 499,000. On Marsh Branch Road, the City could briny water lines from the northern point of the airoort up to Jim Crystal Road, ° LaPorte made a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission that 250,000 for water lines and 4250,000 for sewer lines be held in abeyance for consideration and for ranking. Thompson stated that we should send the CIP on with the Development Guide 45000000 to PZZ, but then go through the processing and do it right, 55/3U16 1 N I ~ PAGE 7 LaForte concurred with this. I Laney addressed the Board. We have a motion to transmit Ll-~ proposed Utility Department 1989-1993 Capital Improvements Plan to the Planning and zoning Commission for inclusion in the total City CIP, with the exception of specification of projects for the Development Guide water and sewer lines, such 4500,000 to be held in abeyance for specific project con aideretion and f rai.king. Second by Thompson. All ayes, no nays, motion carried. r` t EXCERPT MINUTES PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD MAY 11, 1988 b) CIP UPDATE Chairman Laney requested an update on the Utility Department Five Year Capital Improvement Plan from Ham. Ham advised the Board that the CIP will be sent to PAZ this Friday for consideration at their meeting of May 18th, along with the Board's recommendation as given at the last meeting. The Board again reiterated their desire to maintain an active role in review and selection of the Development Guide water and sever lines, utilization of the ranking form as a prerequisite, ! and their feeling that the appropriate review procedure is from Utility Director to Public Utilities Board to Planning and Zoning Commission, Bas assured the Board of the Staff's intent to work within this concept, r MINUTES JOINT MEETING WITH PUS A PAZ ATTACHED HERETO { E 'i 5543U0 4 { f V Minutes . Joint Meeting oT Planning ano Zoning Commission and Public Utilities Board March 27, 1988 i A joint meeting of the planning and Zoning Commission one the Public Utilities Board WAS held on Wednesday, March 25, 198 b, at 5:CC p.m „ in the Civil Defense Room of the Municipal Building. Planning and Zoning Commission Members Present: Bill Claiborne, Euline Brack, Ruby Cole, Ivan Glasscock, Juad Molt, William Kamman and Etna Kiker I Absent: None Public Utilities Doaro Member! Present: Roland Laney, Mark Chew, Kenneth Frady and John Thompson Absent: Robert LlForte Present from Staff: Lloyd Harrell, City "no oil Rick Svehlo, Deputy City Manager and Executive Director for Engineer- ing; Robert Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities; John McGrone, Executive Director for Finance; Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development; f Ernie Tullos, Director of Electric Utilities; David Ham, Director of water/Wastewater Utilities; Jerry Clark, City Engineer; Joell! Orr, Director of Library; Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks and Recreation; David Ellison, Assistant to the City Manager; Joe Morris, Assistant City Attorney; Bob Hagemon, Fire karshall; Monte Mercer, Controller; Jae Thompson, Acting Airport Managers Lee Allison, Senior Erglneer; Ceclle Carron, Urban Planner; Chile 5mith Adminlsttative Assistant; Audrey Bachman and Donna Asker, Sectataries Chairman Bill Claiborne called the getting to order. 1. WORK SESSION TO RECEIVE UPDATE ON EXISTING FIVE YEAR CAPITAL TTS PLAN. Mr. Ellison outlined schedule for development of 1992.57 CIP program followlnp the public hearing later tonight, he gala j Planning antl Zoning Commission will hold two work sessions, the Executive Stall will meet to tank Suppsated projects, the Planning and Zoning Commission will make Its formal recommend- ation to the City Council, and City Council action la tents- tivsly scheduled for June 21, 1968. Mr. Halt arrived at the meatin g, Mr, Harrell hated this Is on Important activity, that city is trying to project what CIP needs are and how to use limited resources over a period of time, He ilia that city is working with a funded CIP through 1990-91 that It has been approved by voters. He ilia it would be djfficult to make adjustments ` during that period of time. List year's program is the first rF year of the unfunded program and Public Utilities Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission will look at that 1991-92 111 program to refine it. City It now building 1992-Y7 LIP pro- y gram. No said it is divided into two parts. The utility r` portion 1s funded with a Combination of bono issues issued by city revenue bands paid off by purchases of city utilities, either water or electric, and operating revenues which are put back into CIP within the utility system. Mr. Laney arrived at the meeting. Mt. Hirtall continued that very little CIP is funded by operating tevenues, most of it is done through issuance i of banal. f a r V t P62 anU Pub MlruteS March 23, 1788 Page 2 In the non-utility area, cityls propetty tax rate is 39.2e cents pet hundred, of that amount 2L.3 Cents is cevotea to retiring outstanclng Debt, he sale as the program was put together for funding, the Llty CcunciI mace that decision without any kinu of a tax lr,rease. Mr. Chew arrived at the meeting, M r, Harrell adoea that the 2U.b cents Should be able to take care w0Ulaolfiperogoraem through thatelast year Cthe ayear. he mount to be said by CIP was increased and there will have to be some refinement 1 before taking it to the voters. I{ Mr. MCGrane advised that the new tar reduction act will have an impact on the GIP. He said that since planning is cone ` hadrteenfUsedyfatsthout ingsthat liketInflation earnings &coca from engineering caste, but under the tall reduction act this can no longer be done, It will have to be rebated back to the government. He said that numbers need to be kept on target as much as pos- sible. Mr. Holt cmmenaea by Planning enaoZoning rtCommission which year but was not approver, by the City Council. He said that school b Its oard has money for its half and would like the city to give i pool half. He Salo he be open forhpublicdusetas welleasIct,ool activities and it would also be available for elderly. He Salo he thought if9ItwcouiU'betadjustedito Onaearlieridateaol and he wonoerea Mr. Martell said that there really is not any flexibility on the three years remaining on funded CIP unless the Commission wanted to recommend to the City Council that more bonds be cold, He said that there is still flexibility in the 1991-52 program year. He edaea that the city council has looked it the proposition, that a consultant was hireo to see if revenue bonds could be Iola. The consultant said an indoor pool will not pay for Itself, that it will nave to to Iubliolreat there- fore, revenue bonds cannot be used, only GOA bands, which (Aetna It woula have to to built into CIP, Chairman Claiborne asked Mr. Laney for comments. Mt. Laney stated that the Public Utilities board has been working on CIP for several months In general terms beginnin with a work cession n o January 3d g . H _ ' an update on thlf y a asked Mr. Nelldn for . Mr, Nelson stated that the Utilities Department has a list of specific projects, that a aedision needs to be moos about how cernsaof thebLanacUseePlannlnYYg Care also ommitteetabott balanceasgrowth. projections, lookeo forecasts. 5g heraelattheacitypiescur- rently serving water to Lake Cities and construction Is under- way to servo Corinth, Hickory Creek and Argyle, he sold city is now buying cone water from Dallas, that water will be taken from Lake key Aoberts in the 1990!, but by 2010 in additional water Supply will be needed. He sold thatyt water plant require- is nesceo.lOweete11 waterlrequ frenantspareaItImithat llionngallons addition per day, capacity Is 1~, an engineering study is Included In the CIP to anslyge site need. At far as electrical is Cdncarnea, It would be mid to late 199Us before additional capacity is neaeedl a bonus was given to some customers to shut down it 2 p.m. last summer which Conserved power, He Isla electrical budget Is operational items, maintenance and teplacement of existing Items. i. ~f ) N I Pat and PLB Minutes March 23, 1966 Page 3 I fir. Nelson Outlined mayor water projects as water plant, water tower, h dreelectric units, water taps and meters, 2" water line replacements, specific water line replacements, unspec- iflea water line replacements, water line replacements for street program, and oversize water lines. He salu they are trying to replace ano upgrade all 2" water lines over a period of time as lines are failing and continue to cause problems. (on question, he said that road repairs are included when road is torn cut to replace lines. He continued that major wastewater projects are sewer plant addition, sewer lift stations, sludge oisposal program, inflow/ j infiltration corrections, specific sewer line replacements, unspecified sewer line replacements, sewer line replacements for street program, oversize sewer lines. He said old clay tile sewer lines are being replaced. He said that major electric system projects include generator overhaul, power plant equipment replacements/repairs, street lights, a new building and dispatch center, conductor replace- ment, and two substation additions. He emphosizca the need for a centralized dispatch system stating that the secretaries now handle this. Special electric projects are automated map- ping, energy conservation/A.C, efficieny program, electric load management, new building, utility dispatch center, radio systems, and converting overhead electric lines to underground. He said the automated mapping system needs additional funding, they have {100,000 in bud at this year for that. he also silo that electric department is now maintaining all radio systems for the city Changing existing overhead electric lines to underground is b300,000 per year and he questioned whether this is an appropriate amount. Mr. Nelson further stated that replacements are paid from current revenues, that system additions and improvements are included to most growth of cltP that utilit oversize$ to serve anticipated growth for 13 to 20 years in vicinity of line, that developers are required to extend from nearest water or sewer line of reasonable capacity, he mentioned special water line extensions of March Stanch Road, Ranch Estates to Masch Branch Roaol Mash Stanch Rosa, University to Jim Christal Rood; Bonnie Brae Rosa, University to Payne Drivel Airport to West Side, for a total of $616,000. Special sewer line extensions mentioned were Cooper Creek, Follmeiaow Addition to Stuart Rosa; West University, I-35 to Malonal Brodkhollowl Hickory Creek Parallel Highway 360 to Alrpottl Much Branch Road University to Jim Christal Road) and Mayhill Aoad, Mayhill to Sewer Plant, for a total of $1,173,000. He said $250,000 a year his been set aside for water Ina $230,000 a year has been set aside for lower to address con. corns of Lard Use Planning Committee on balanced growth, he said they need direction on where those lines need to go, me said they also nova direction on whether to leave special water line and special sewer line extensions in) those linei are not needed to serve existing customers, Mr. Frady asked if property owners would be assessed. Mr. Nelson Said they would be asollso as they tied on, how- ever, that normally would not pay entire cost. Mr. Nelson said policy questions mesa to to adaressedi Should there be a maximum amount to meet LUPL goals, how much should be set aide to achieve this goal? Should there be a revolving fund? Shoula this come from current revenues or bcnd funds? i ' i R P61 and PLO Minutes March 2), 1966 Page 4 He said when funds come from current revenues, there is a one ti/2mep4 erpce pornttent rate increase, If taken from bona funds, a lar year increase would be required. Ne saitl they tend to recommend use of current revenues, that lines need to be put where city can get most revenues. i t Chairman Glalborne advises that it was time for the f nearing to Cegin and adjourned the meeting at 5:35 ppu.m,bltic ,to the Council Chamber for the public hearing. t 11. PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE SLGGtSTICNS FUN HROJECT5N1G BE NLL N H AN L M ME LA. E Chairman 6111 Claiborne welcomed r new staff member, Gonna Baker, and opened the public hearing. I Mr. Clark gave a brieflny on the status of current LIP projects. Projects aiscussed were paving, drainage, side- walks, turn lanes, bridges, signalization, and the Master Drainage Plan. He silo the drainage regulations are being put f CommissionoandaCityiCouncilrfornapprovalne Then final adraftnofg the drainage design Manuel has been received and they hope to have that reviewed in the next two weeks and, age regulations are approved by Planning &noZoning Commission aria City Council, the manual will be ready for use. The next phase of Master Drainage Plan, when completed, will be the s actual expansion Into the ETJ to cover the entire 133 square 9 mile area currently mapped, Mr. Brinkman gave a progress report on the Parks and Recrea- tion projects, He saitl a construction meeting was held this week on the Martin Luther King, Jr, Center and construction will start next week. Park planners have been hired td work on Denis, North Lakes and Evers Parks and park plans should be completed by December of this year, An architect will be hired to work on expansion of Senior Center in May, vitn con- struction expected to start in January 1969. Ms, Orr said that the library staff and Library Board have been working with library planners on plans for the library and a report will be submitted by the end of April. Mr. Svehla static that sites for the two future fire stations have been acquired at Lillian Miller aria Teasley Lane, one at bonnle Brae and Windsor Drive. The preliminary drawings have been completed and will go to bid in July or August 1966. Mr. Svehla a three and shipped from Petarbiltlost week one delivery to completed on the first one in October. Chairman Claiborne turned the chair over to Roland Loney, Chairman of the Public Utilities Board. Chairman Laney took the chiir and asked for public input for the utility CIP program foe the years 1986-9). he stated that he would like to remind the citizens that when the City spends money for utilities, they have to gat It back, whether It is through bond Issues or current revenues and that this effects rates. Ray Mickel, wish Denton County Health Department, named three areas with recurring sewage problemat 1) on )80 East, the Capricorn Mobile Home Park= 2) on 380 west, the Denton Estates Mobile Home Park; and 3) an Polhill Road, rom around Gayle kdad down through Mayhill Neela Home Park, Those areas are not on the clty~I sewer syctem, they are controlled by their own septic systems and could benefit greatly by havimp mania tory Sewer. In the lost year, the Denton County Health 1 w Piz and PLB Minutes March 27, 15&b ' Page 5 Uepattment has rectivea numerous valid complaints due to the problems•with these systems. The problem in all three areas is old, small lots, Inadequate for disposal, ana frequently sewage surfaces. At Capricorn, sewage flows into a field south of prrk; along Mayhill hold, sewage flows onto adjacent properties; along Gayle, sewage flaws into a drainage creek; ` at Denton Estates, sewage flaws into a drainage ditch that ` goes under 38U. On question, Mr. Meckel said that all of these systems were installed years apo before any type of regulations or controls were In place and with the little room that they have to work with, they cannot add disposal fields for cn-site disposal. j Mr. Frady asked Mr. Meckel what his authority is to require 11 them to correct the situation. Mr. Meckel said they are an extension of the state health department and it is their official cipccity to abate any violation. On further ques. tion, h! silo it is not feasible td order them td correct the situation. Chairman Laney asked if these were eitner In the Denton city limits or partially in city limits. Nr. Meckel said that they were. i. Walter Kingston, 3921 Gayla, stated that he has been in the city for the last two years and nos not received any city help other then trash pickup. He said he has two septic tanks and has adage lateral lines so that his back yaard is completely rise ronawtnenlflorslintoea,aitcn.when He saiahesfsstooge a cloy ' hill and there is no way for it to soak up. Wallace Duvoll, 2100 Souls Lane, president of the Central Business District Assoclation, referred to a letter IoLmitteo to the Planning and Zoning Commission by him which outlines some major problems in the city. Among the Stems which ■re hance the nCoto the ntrol Dullness iDistrictil2)aparking anotes ltoeto I adaresSSa; 3) paving needs to be continLec; o) there is no access for okiating handicapped parking on some parts of the I square and signs designating handicapped parking are not ap. proprlate; 5) sidewalks are in a general state of disrepair; 6) dumpsters are unsightly but they can't have a solution; and 7) in general, the beautification of the city distinctive lighting in particular. Ma adage thet the Central Business ` District Association is becoming more active, tha eity has appointed a Beautification Committee and a Meln Street Com- mittee and the Association will be wotking with those com- mittees. Chairman Claiborne stated that there are currently CIP funds committed for more Street paving for streets surrounding the square. These its on hold due to the problems with relocation of underground utilitles and, the location of the large bores. He added that if anyone could come up with a solution to the ' dumpster problem, the Cammlislon would be interested in hear- ing it, Chairman Laney added that cable Service Is nor avail- able around the square. Norma Gamble, 2205 North bonnie S rie, addressed road canal- area o She water silo one heard Mt, Clark isaynthat tNorth nBarrieaBrat E would be consttuctea beginning about January 19x9, She laid it is now a dangerous situation and Improvement has been needed for many years are they ato looking forward to it, She said there are many acres in, the area just 2 1/2 miles from the Courthouse which have been in the city far 30 years. They do not a water or stated later. sh~ t referreoetrlierto am oversized rater line ontBonniedBrno to nowniii- I Pat ano Pub Minutes March 23, 19b8 ' Page 6 be installed. They would like to have the water line put in before the toad is put in so that the road would not have to be torn up. The water line is needed not only for the resi- dents, but also for the new fire station at Windsor and bonnie brae. There could be a major problem if there is a fire that could not Le reached due to a lack of water lines in the area. -he Fire Lepartment has had to use pumper trucks in previous t fires. Mrs. 6amDle added that she Is on a septic system, as well as other neighbors, ano they would like to be on city sewer. She would like to develop her land, but is unable to N put in water lines due to the Cost of those lines. She has no one to share the cost with because the major property owner across the street is city park. She was told several years ago the cost for their one house would De 550,606. She does f not think this is fair. Ms. Gal-ble acted that she would like the Commission to consider trig first before the city starts looking at projects outside the city limits or on the very exterior of the city limits or projects added since they have been in city. Joe Burris solo his interest is a thoroughfare that he is running from 380 south through the airport and possibly on down to 2449, which would constitute a west airport loop. He silo even if city is participating on paving, he would Is IILe utilities put in at the same time. He sold if this is ooge, a public/private partnership or whatever manner it is f cone It would possibly open up west sloe of Denton for indus- trial development. He laic 4,00 feet of waterline and a tewerline is needed. Chairman Loney asked if this would be outside the proposeo Loop 2b6 area. Mr. Burris said that it would not be on the outside, but rather on the inside of Loop 286. he said he hao barn told that this was locates on a fall line where sewago flows down- hill. If the city would install heavier utility mein:, in this area, then it would be possible to serve that entire part of the city without building a lift station. He said if mains could be run alongside the road, all that property would be available for development. Mr. Burris said L at he would like the Commission to consider improvements for water Ana sewer in this area. i bill Holt, Edon,mic Development Director fat the Chamber of Comfatoo, referred to the existing CIP as it pertsing to Match 1 branch Road. Me Salo he feels Match Branch Rosa is important to opening up the west sloe of Denton, He solo in amalyring lens use patterns that appear to be developing on watt side of the city, he feels the city is Showing good thinking in trying to bring thorougphfares ano utility structures into that area, he said interne l streets will be built by others but critical mesa is to get quick access to 35C from the west aide of the city end making the extension to Loop 2bb the next pri- ority should be consicerea. He acdeo that there is a lot of activity on west side of Denton now ano to enhance abilityy to attract quality development to Denton, a quick access to 35E from SSW is absolutely critical. Allis Miller, Route 10 Box 409, on Mosch Branch Roma, stated that he has been In city for Six years. He Salo that hs is in a designated growth area and has had several industrial prospects but none have been big enough to bring in utilities alone. M, asked that, Since the building of Match Stanch Road is two tic three years aw Sy, the cityy g0 Mead ano put In the sewer anc watet lines before the building of Match Branch Roma. he Commented that trill road Mt. Burris referred to is to go to A atopOAed asphalt twtch plant which he it against. f ti t ' Pat and PUB Minutes March 23, 1988 Pape 7 i PaUl Haygo00, paStdr Of Life Tabernacle Church, Stated they have 10 acres At the cornet of Bonnie Brea one Windsor on ? which they are enceAvorlnp to build a church, but they have no city utilities. he Sala Bonnie Brae Street Is Included in CIP but CIP also needs to include the water and sewer lines to this area. He said a water loop, a fire loop, a fire sta- tion, toa as, sidewalks, perimeter improvements are reload. he said they need to build a church, a community. Me stated that he is for development and growth, tut not at the expense of the taxpayers and community services, he feels the city ti snaula pay attention to the people who are already here lostead of thinking of ways to bring more people into the city. He E stressed that the North Bonnie Brae area is an area that rates help first. h Cane Gamble, 2265 North Bonnie Brae stateo that he owns 18 ? acres. he said he lives about .4 mile north of University and about 2 mile south of Windsor and that the closest they are to utilities is 1,000 feet. Mr. Gamble stateo that they were able to talk the city into bringing utilities to Bonnie brat when the recreation center was put In, but they have not been able to use them yet. He sale if a sewer line was. put in, it would cover 750 acres for single family homes. He added he felt th! city would like to tee the street at the watt/north- west corhar of his property opened up to relieve some of the i* traffic from the Greenway area. he his spoken with the Parks/ Recreation and Fire OepartmenS personnel Ana they both feel that these utilities are needed to pet proper pressure. He :a said Parks also would like to develop their 60 acres aerost the street from his property. Dwight Borel, 21b6 Parkside, stated that last year a private survey of the traffic at the intersection of Bonnie Otto and Windsor found that, in a 24 hour period, 10,000 vehicles had gone through this intersection. He said he feels with that much traffic, the toad conditions should be addressed, along with the road repairs, there is also a need for water and sewer lines In the area. Larty Frank, P.O. Box 273), stated that he is speaking on came f of W, H. Smith, who owns 32 acres at Payne and bonnie stag. Mr, Smith has Owned this property since 1972 and about ' 1974 granted in easement across the cornet of his property so that the lake could be built. He continued that about 16 months ago he requested a zoning change for Mr. Smith but was unable to proceed because of the distance the utilities would have to be extended. They feel the weterline should be run down Bonnie Brae for the fire station ana for housing in that area. Mr. Frank said they feel that the city should put In water aha fewer lines to accommodate the people in this area, he added they have recently spent considerable time with a prospective developer of mt. Smith's property for SF-7 lots. Mr. Ham addressed the areas that have been innexe0 since 1965 ana stated that the city is required to consider, each year, whether to serve annexed areal with water and sewer, he pointed out areal which were annexed In 1963, in 1966 ono in ` i 1987 and the cost required to serve those areas, The total i for all the areas for all three years is b6,206,500. He said this 10 offered for consideration as to whether these areas should bt recommended in the CIP. ! Chairman Laney asked for some information about the Bonnie Brea and Windsor area, whsle the Nor concerns seem to be, Mr. Ham replied that a let a Stott Ire up Hinkle Drive 'its been completed which will Pmcrease capacity all the way up to the North i.mket area And up to the corner of Windsor and Bonnie best. he said that sewer lime could be extendaa to serve proparl'.es at that cornet which would include the Smith, Gamble, church ptoperty, and the fire station, On question, I i C! t~ P61 anp Pl1B Minutes Match I), 1568 Paae 8 ne saki th a line plus the line to serve 7e~a. Instruments were sited td take care of that upper region, Mr, Thompson asked if this was on a first come, first sc[ve Casls, Mt. Ham sold yes. Mr. Nam Sala that on xater for the 8onnle Bzae area, the wduldlcostwE780,G0he tihismwouldmope~ 9plwatet servloetint i the entire region, It would tie !n and loop the 8" line alpnq wlnda0r tD the coin![ of 6onnle Brae aC rOSa anp 1n front of North Lakes Recreation Lentez. It was In the cIP for next Yea[, however, tn~s !s a line the Utility Department woulD } 6oarafto cunsidei asdalcomm~n4tymaevelopmentPitemobetauselit woulD not necessatlly benefit the Dtflity Department, !t would someduea~ with problemsoauentdloldeesllnes tna0 needtto bet I replaces Ceeause of deterloratlDn, Dreaks, and also for up- graalnq from 2" Iines, Mr. Ham lDentifled lines loot the would ilk! cansfaered u community development linos as[ y!y _ ~ line, ewtlnd down from RanCn EataCeJ MDUtn7B7aand thin !ouch openaupnGevelopmentdon~theawastlsldeoofsthelaitpast;l7) Bonnie 6eae water line; 4) Codpet Creek patallsl sewer line; S) nest l'nlverslty parallel sever line; 6) parallel serer line far Hftkory Creak and tnotner btancn of that whim xould possibly 1 serve area wit ]80 west; 7) Mayh111 Roao sewer line ss men- tfoned by Aay Merkel tort caulo serve a trailer park, f Ch,vfrman Claiborne asked Mr, Ham if ne had a map at the Uty p fazcthehlast flue y~+rstdrtgteatert rMZelHam solo tnatrneedoes nav! a mip that ahDws what at laS haV• nOt reC lived Ut111t1eS for some time. He said ne dues not nave a map snowln0 ewcctly haw many years each area has gone without utllltlea, that that information woulD nav• t0 Da coordinated with the Plannlnq and Oevelopment Oepattment. Chairman Claiborne aske0 Mr, Ham haw notgreeelvinp utllitleatrltninttlve yeari oz grid osaM+taMOm Uid about a week. C Mlrman C1alDOtn• asked him to get with the Planning Oepartment eno prepare such a ma0. Chairman lanes asked that the map pe presented tb both the Plannlnq and 2onlnq Commfaslon and the Public Utllftiea Bo a d. On question, Me. Hem bald that tna 0" waterline now gars to the corner o/ wlnasor ana Payns coat it la a 500-600 gafIor,s ~ per minut• line, he aalD loaf ~a not au Nteient foe anything Dthet than sinpla h mils ono what la needed is a 1,SG0-D,CUu rouIdnbepto runuael6"nl~nenfrdmwUnlreraitYluJ Bannle 9raopand ' tla into the B" !!ne at kindaor, kr. Haygnd~ said that for fire protection for the !burro and the wrrdundtnq a: u, he felt that a larger site line would Oe neeeuary for the Bonnie Brsa area, Mr. Ham agreed. On quesefon, h• Bald that the water line would he places on the ahoulde~ of U • toad, a0 nd tDao work woultl be MDN Nry, He ulo sew et lines qo down the center of the rasa; however mere ata no plans at th L time for a aawaz line, due to thr l~te2e development in cola area. Mr, Hageman stressed the head for fire protection for the people In the »nnla Brat atle ono ldr the further a"panaion of tna area, r,~ sold tha looping would give mor• protection, He also eaf erred to the Much Branch area where there nav• been fir a requiring water tD be rhuttled tram Dnlveeslty, e i PAZ and Pub minutes March 23, 19b8 Page 9 i 500 gallons at a time, which Is time consuming and fires r;on't wait. He asked the Planning Ono Zoning LOrrmissicn and the Public Utilities Board to look at these two areas that are in desperate need for water for fire protection. Chairman Claiborne took the Chair and proceeded with Non- Utility CIP requests. Mr. Burris sAitl that h! felt the City should participate in l road funding on the west side, particularity on what he called the West Airport Loop Thoroughfare as there are only about four property owners involved, including the city airport. He said this is the toad that runs from 36U down the west side of the airport and down to 2049 which Is on the mister Thorough- fare Plan but It has not been named. i Mr. Halt said that he aid not share the concerns of Mr. Burris about that particular [dadway. He said he felt the major con- cern was Loop 266 south between 350 anc 35E. Rooney Haire, 306 Stormrilge Circle, Argyle, said he is speak- ing for Liberty Church and school at 1500 Bonnie Brae street. He said that the condition of the road 14 very boo, that there are two foot ditches on each side of the road Ono that this road is too narrow to ptCperly 41100 rdOM for two vehicles. The road IS a safety hereto for students who drive to school as well 4f. Via, buses. He Said that daily there ate six r- vehicles that carry students back And forth to area cities me F' well as in Oenton. he addeo that the school has teen upgraded and will be hosting more athletic events In the future which means more busts on the :'040. He asked the Commission CO include improvement of bonnie Brae in the CIP. Chairman Claiborne said that there were two families who were unable to attend, cue to a deatn In the family, but that they have Sent letters to state their feelings on some problems that they see. One area is a drainage problem on West Lek Street and avenue G. After several conversations with Engi- hearing, they were told that the problem would be corrected in October 1967 and it was not. This letter wig signed by Eleanor Swan and Lorene Wells. Another drainage problem that he had been mode aware of Is at the corner of Cordell and Malone. Mr. Clark Stated that these areas are projects in the CIP, Mr. Thompson asked why there was only 625,000 put in CIP for traffic signals; he felt that would not be enough. Mr. Llark stated that this amount was just for controller upgrade. He stated that it is not necessary to put to a wtols new signal system just to upgrade the current system. Mr. Thompsri asked if the ocit of the slgnalitatlon is included in the street improvements faction of the CIP. Mr. ClotK said no. He advised that 6225,000 was put in CIO last year for three new traffic si,inals. Mr. Thompson said that he felt that traffic signals are dm important issue and that the situation would steadily become worse. Mr. Clark said that between now and the time a signal is scheduled, If it becoaise a bad situation, Enginearing will place t s problem in the operating budget. He said signals are In the 1991-92 LIP. Reverend HaygoOC said that he and Mr. Frank would like to request a drainage study to to completed rot the Bonnie Brae { project where the city cut out camel through concrete runoff to the North Lakaa project. He said that periodically, not often, there Is 12" to 2U" of water at the Bonnie Brae and i Windsor intersection, he said ha was told at one time that All drainage problems would be eliminated In the CIP. Mr. Clark stated that if the aovolopet covelops after the ptojer.t, the city will put the Culverts in AMC handle the boa culverts along with the major pipes. he sold these were figured into the cost when they were Initially estimated. i Pat and PUB Minutes March 23, 1968 Pape 10 + Chairman Claiborne askea if there were any other questions or comments.regaroinq utility or non-utility matters. Name were offered. He thanked the Public Utilities Board for joining the Commission, also the utility staff. Me also thanked the public for coming to snare their re4uests and Comments with j the Commission and the Board. 3 Joint P&2/PUB meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. •4~'n <E } ~4 k i j , ]p r, ~i 1 i T Mti I kNr A f 1 i I f 1 I C) F Fl LE I i