Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
07-06-1993
ny.: 1 1 1 I ~ 4. 4 l • I s . r Gov p i a 18 19 20 21 22 2.3 24 25 26 2 r a, ~ { N '~5'2 ' ~ 88S S JAI 230,12' 110.0 ' 110.00' 11o.oo' ~ 1 4 5 o 3 ~cv n i 1 D J~~~/ r- , \ B.L. IL - 6.36'; j i N - f-~, 004 89'0y"6" f - 41y.11' s T 1 U S 89 5'15" _ © 1 40 16. 8 - 125.00' -105.00` 105.00 ~N % r.N 16 I I oo% do 1$ 5 oo m 19 - 20 ~ , i r 1 J 1 15 9 C~ _ 7,97 105.23' 1--105'25 Y 137,15 ii ~ S 86'18'i -a It I ~ 105,08I N 175.00' e'*1 z / / w 15 s 14 r F 17fn 16/ ((40 co ° off, 17.57-1 )T 1 ' 1 L •120.o0~ 18\4~r' 1 1\ 161,62 y 105.00 r 1~ 1 a +24" W _ 265,92 V' 11.70,a. 12 . sx -2 i . a r 13 r. 00 co cPr o 14 ml,' % lJ. rVV l1 v. S 89s N 150~~ -14,48 I ti~4 G4 30'12'4 4150.00 79.19 S 75'08'11* E '78.18 1 Lot 310,1 153,0 100 ` , . 06'24" r rte' ° - - - - b q 11 302 5 SF 16 W b Prop.., 25' U,E, ~I R.O.W. 10, RIOA ~ Dedr Ded, I .YaJ. iV Y~rW 4FY. Y~wMM Frr V~~il YJ.Y~Y irw.YY Y_- MI rM MI .Y r~YJ YY W l . Yw. rr~ W ~w 1rY YYJ YI.1 wt Ywl iYl V YFw W IM1J r. NM iJ Y ~Y W rN ~ Mi ~r r~www4+w.YW a/z" N 39'43'04 5 f 1,7'7' Ir" T'EASLEY LANE, Fo M, x181(40' R, O. W, y .wYMd~wY _'YYWwWYwVW~r~il~wi~i~iY.r.a~Ywr.uwwW - ww+w Y~Y~. Yww.Yr-.i..ar. w~Y a- •wrawrwi.w+naw.w WY ra waar.n4raYYriM~rJJwYY~rY. JJ•~a+r MYYUI w~r..iYrarY wnM1 si i •r 'r r. r r7 r . `c i i J Lod 5 Ji l Ab- WIV i MOO* F. kk 1 1,1~IAYIr 111E oil IAK I I A F'I ~~F ~tt~~►r ~ I )AIt b ! 11 1k A ~ 11A~ Nil OAKf, KIM ~1 ~FAu 11(1 I ~ N 11 111111 Q I T k"V 1 Ii hl In av 0 i X10 n h Is A~ I{ bA 1 ' W P 0 420 %fal 60, 0 60' 100' { k 11 ' s q, + +I I~ ITI?I-III II I ARY I?M'I,AP 11017 ` E Isprt Ir 1~ 7I 4Y ~ ~~I ~UfIIINEIU ~ ? Iti +1wI11' a, ~alls~_ 7, r. rIf llu }and wMiln the IIUn r110 1H F'f~1fi il~ah'ffi f,ttiwh I~~~I hr,ut+,ll lodr-InvuvInllt ^chool 111stIJc I.IIFa l►unlltl;rii~4 of this Nvplat ,ire Arlx II ►1c I Aj , rein f►Istrlct, wlIIIe Ilu1l:;l►rt.It al id t P. a ) h I~li)rl 4E i, f~ 1 - hell e t h,1 111j, 1:1 ov Lit i ~ lit 1 ~ xoNB C1 G gill+y ski : 7., P~Ilal al•rr~a~.le fa 3,509 acres, Th S~ taA1")Ill fly { f t or, illent 1 ,11 , Mu land Wl l l he tied rent The i►rupnsetl land woo is IRi Ss } + 9g0~ he dedicated for city pax k. 96.60 S )8~ vlsiAFi o'' ~QF S Sf@° 1y~p1• I~j41j11 , 1111 new Ill I I I l ~ I'U113tf IlCllnil l Irl g ,xt, f 407,60, 1Ov JSIIII111 f~ tIli9 lte ►1at, } ~1 l 1►f nkill'44nd 1► t- namoP- 1 nn "ul 1 It i t~ ~'~pµ,H, s IRf 4' V"CIO SG4 C A P p LO LO 1 41~1~ 20' sAN. s~w~R % 'Chore ir, a new G" pul►llc water ma ESMT. slrhsa 1 J serve Iiut 4. bndergtol)nd elrclt 11 uOHN C. GAY, et ux r o'saN sew~p s\~ ~a N 1 ~3 frnm thn 30 hotel ul.llity easement EsMY. FIEWER ;lanl Lai y sewer w1 l1 Uc connected 1 ~12 w s3 gap f.\ o fluny the North niEle`of thN 3.339 V 714 P i l8 m i \ Aso. 596. s Q~ yi s``'y `LOCKLOT 3 F1Fe liy1lfaAls were l+,sl.alfl+~1 Ili 1.1 Qr 1 Tomas Hivnla Elnmmitary Schoul 11a Vii- - ADKISSON ADDN,' 4, 14o1. 4 1 oohed 5F-'f. The 3,314 m H CISCO SURVEY, xoN6 Af t PA C1TY OF DENTON zoned HF• l Y i V . 628 P r. A--• 1184 HUDSPET}i ,8 V.3246 P,317 M J. E3 ROCK ;~~~'~~FY r~-J5. All of lho F'1t+,~i1w,,y in ~lelincated .~Ti~ ' ~MCA ps° x9~ G titaInalir, (1-invlnenl, Tlii 1) uulltls of ,979 PALS Gpo A0l 1 _ API AP LOCATION ai'r,e \ n 3S ./2!"S4N56wER 11~~ F1 il!Ilwny -f ; oliown are tuxuoll I zoNe,SI!7 Fluull ]h:~utalllk~ Elate Map. CID dZN4 `SAN, S wER~~` 6, Tim devc toper 1.1 Willie liudipet.h. PoOtBe 60.5 1AAL LO ELEV.- $00. ELM. Boas _clscoS ~a9zJ. IRF~ 6 55'0:r Z 867,00 7, A permit will be required in otdei Y • 46,70 Y -`'N 71~' 9"\9. O`~ 17 lA" 11tawkit"t of ldreI'er , 124 Ir+jl.31 / 30. 7 IIr84`1 >r I F 30.001 f / 30' OENE;RAL ~r UTII„ EASEMENT ~J - LOT ZOWSF-7 18' VTIL. EASEMENT BLOCI ' MINTER 'ER ADDN CAB I~P25► gCOVED JUL 411993 K oxmimo MfLopmea D DEVELOPM WILLIE AND DOHETHA NUDSPEtN 316 u. SONNIE BRAE DENTON, TEXAS PREMtINliRY REPLAT of the MINTI CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL LOT , 4R of BL( i Being a Replat of Lot4, Mock c Plus 3.338 Acres of Un 1 Approved this day at 1993 $s RROCK SUE., A ~ 1SC0 9lJR~, A u IRS IRON ROD Orr by tho City Council. of tho City of Denton, Texas. de Ho C CM Ik C ISCOY' of DR1 w IRON ROD FOUND ws..u..+ .r.Yll.uY..W JAW 41 YJ.. ......++.w.~rr .wu w .w_.._ SURVEY UNE (mayor) UATF„ 22 APR. 1993 ~I ..fa wYW+r~..r.Y.waY.r....Yrr.wt..I wY M..w~w1f4.i.~.wN.MrJ .IY.J+.IW.W W.W .r.. w.Y..AYJY Y.ur DRAWN NYC MI) 1 1 COI.ER (City Secretary) 9CAiA i100' r...u+Y ....Y..r.4..4a.Y..L....W..Yv.i..n.i.. ...a.._r.Y... Y.. YY.... YVw.V. REVISED: da2d,93 DENTO I L f !J 1 i 1 1 I J CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET July 6, 1993 f I iy i FFP r f ApenO~Nc.~ -dam AQAf►Qd1~4Ri,,,,r„ AGENDA Dee - CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL July 6, 1993 Work Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 6, 1993 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered: NOTE: Any item listed on the Agenda for the Work Session may also be considered as part of the Agenda for the Regular session. 5:15 P.M. 1. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 2. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding proposed changes-.to, the boards/commissions ordinance and give staff direction. 3. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the O#Neil Ford ceremony of July 30 and 31, 1993 and give staff direction. 4. Receive a report and 'told a discussion regarding the selection of the Divernion Task Force members and give staff direction. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 61 1993 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be consideredi 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Consider approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 181 19930 the Special Call meeting of May 25, 1993 and the Regular Meeting of June 11 1993. 3. Citizen Report A. Receive a citizen report from Gene Lewis regarding the smoking ordinance in view of recent EPA findings. B. Receive a citizen report from Willie Hudspeth regarding staff notification to him on a zoning issue and the CouncilOs negative reaction to development in southeast Denton. City of Denton City Council Agenda July 6, 1993 Page 2 3.1. Consider adoption of an ordinance abandoning and vacating that certain street right-of-way easement on approximately 0.185 acres of land lying in the C. Poullalier Survey, Abstract Number 1006, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and being part of a tract of land from Robert A. Nichols, et al to Alan Goldfield, et ux, recorded in Volume 2908, Page 534 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas; and reserving a utility easement therein. 4. Public Hearings A. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance providing for a change from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development (PD) Zoning District classification and Use Designation for 6.427 acres of land located west of the intersection of Pennsylvania Drive and Southmont Drive, and immediately south of St. Mark's Catholic Church, 2-93-016 (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval 5-1,) B. Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance rezoning the land in Planned Development No, 19 from a mixed use development to the followings - Single Family 16 (SF-161 - 16.2 acres located at the northwest corner of Teasley and Lillian Miller and 136 acres located across Lillian Miller on the east side, both north and south of the Teasley/Lillian Miller intersection - Office, 0[oj. with conditions - 4.7 acre] located on the east side of Lillian Miller, both north and south of the "T" intersection with Teasley, 2-93- 010 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval 6-0.) C. Hold a public hearing to consider the final replat of the eastern half of Lot 7 and all of Lot. 8, Block 3, Wattam Addition; Into Lot 8R. The .758 acre tract is located at the northwest corner of Collins and Welch Streets. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval 6-0.) D, Hold a public hearing to consider the preliminary and final replats of Lot 4, Block A of the Minter Addition, plus approximately 3.36 acres of unplatted land; into Lot 4R, Block A. The 3.589 acre site is located on the northern terminus of Newton Street, approximately 450 feet north of its intersection with Wilson street. (The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval 6-0.) 5 agenda No c) 3 C7 '~~1 Apend Item _c City of Denton City Council Agenda Dote July 6, 1993 3 Page 3 5, Public Requests A. Consider a request for a noise exemption for the Pro Youth Rodeo Association at the North Texas State Fairgrounds on Saturday July 10, until 12 midnight. B. Consider a request for a noise exemption for the North Texas Auto Fair at the North Texas State Fairgrounds on Sunday, July 18, from 12 noon to 6100 p.m. C. Consider a resolution temporarily closing Crosstimber Street between Mill and Wye Streets and Wye Street Between Crosstimber and Mill Streets on Friday, July 16, 1993. 6. Consent Agenda Each of these items is recommended thereof will be strictly onthebasis of he Staff t recommendations, Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations, The City Council has received background information and has had an opportunity to raise questions regarding these items prior to consideration. Listed below are bids and purchases orders to be approved for payment under the ordinance section of the agenda. Detailed back- up information is attached to the ordinances (Agenda item 7.A, 7.B). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of the Consent Agenda. Upon the receipt of a "request to speak" form from a citizen regarding an item or, the Consent Agenda$ the item shall be removed and be considered before approval of the Consent Agenda. A. Bids and Purchase Ordors= 1. Bid 11513 - Softball 6 Soccer Complex Hydromulch 2. Change Order - P.O. 032209 - Clifford Fogus B. Plats 1. Preliminary plat of Lots 1 through 21, Block A, and Lot 1, Block B, Hunter's Ridge Addition. The 16,205 acre tract is located at the northwest corner of Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley Lane. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval 6-1,) _a Venda No 49enda ~Ite~m City of Denton City Council Agenda 0916 -~-t= July 6, 1993 y` Page 4 co Tax Refunds 1. Jackie R. Norris, M.D. - $1,206.78 7. Ordinances A. Consider adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. (6.A.1. - Bid 01513) B. Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution of a change order to a contract between the City of Denton and Clifford Fogual and providing for an increase in the contract price. (6.A.2. - Change Order P.O. 023309) C. Consider adoption of an ordinance establishing fees to be paid in relation to an application for or renewal of a loading zone. (The Citizens Traffic Safety support commission recommends approval.) 81 Resolutions A. Consider approving a resolution establishing and creating a special citizens advisory committee to provide recommendations regarding a possible additional sales tax to reduce the property tax. 9. Receive nominations for the City's Boards and Commissions. 10. Update on the Vision for Denton-21st Century Project. (Council Members Brock and Miller) 11. Staff Direction The following items are listed for staff directiont A. Major Budget Issues Report 12. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. 13. Official Action on Executive Session Items A. Legal Matters B, Real Estate C. Personnel D. Board Appointments geoaaNo _ Awa item htt _ - " City of Denton City Council Agenda SLR S July 6, 1993 Page 5 14. New Business This item provides a section for Council Members to suggest items for future agendas, 15. Executive Session: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under See. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. NOTE: THE CITY COUNCIL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME REGARDING ANY ITEM FOR WHICH IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE. C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Denton, Texas, on the day of , 1993 at o'clock (a.m,) (p.m.) CITY SECRETARY NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS IS ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY WILL PROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING, PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 566-8309 OR USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX SO THAT A SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER CAN BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE CITY SECRETARVtS OFFICE. ACC0012B i a A r a i~ - - da ffL5 De 7 - l.► OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM Tos Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Debra A. Drayoviteh, City Attorney SUBJFCTs Qualifications for Board and Commission Members DATES June 9, 199 Pursuant to your request of June 1, 1999, attached please find a copy of the City Code provisions relating to qualifications for membership to city boards and commissions. The City Charter also contains a requirement that members of boards or commisisione which have final decision making authority, as officers of the City, cannot enter into a contract with the City for the sale or purchase of goods, services, or property. The ordinance provisions may be amended or deleted, should you so desire. If you should have any questions in this regard, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, no ra A. Drayov I DADsys Attachment poi Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager 'bedicafed ro Qiierly Servln' ' 'vendif Mo C l - L. ~oenlialt r ADMINISTRATION ~11ir t7 -_q ARTICLE III. BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMIWEES' DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Seos. 2.46-2.80. Reserved. DIVISION 2. QUALIFICATIONS FOR MEMBERS Sec. 2.61. Requirements generally. Each member of a board or commiselon, In addition to qualifications, prescribed by federal or state law or ordinance, shall be a qualified voter of the city and shill not be in arrears in the payment of any taxes or other llabilitfes due the city. (Code IVA, 4 1.21(x)) Sec. 2.62. Conflict of Internat. No member of a board or commission of the city that has final decision-making authority shall have a financial Interest, direct or Indirect, in any contract with the city or be financially interested, directly or indirectly, in the We to or by the city of any land, materials, supplies or services. For purposes of this section, boards and commissions which have final decision. making authority include but are not limited to the planning and toning commission, the board of adjustment, civil service commission and the building code board. (Code 1988, 11-22) Charter reference-Personal interest of officers and employees, 114.04. State law reference-Conflict of Interest, V.T.C.A., local Government Code 1171.001 et seq. Sec. 2.89. Removal from office, Should a board or commission member cease to meet the qualifications prescribed in section 2.81 or 2.62, if applicable, or should such member be convicted of a felony during his term of service, such failure or conviction, as the case may be, shall be cause for removal. I (Code 1988,1 1.23) i Ii l 'Charter reference-Boards and commissions, 1 14.18. Cross references-Libt ary board, 12-176 et seq.; downtown development advisoryboard, 12.211 et seq.; beautification advisory commission, 12.241 A seq,; airport advisory board,1 3.2; animal shelter advisory committee, 10-5 et seq,; cable TV advisory board,! 8.130; human services committee, 1 11.61 et seq,; park and recreation board, 122.1; building code board, 1 28.41 et seq,; electrical code board, 1 28.96 et seq.; plumbing as ,J mechanical ooh board, 11 28.186 et seq,, 28.271 et seq.; development review committee, 134-61 board of adjustment,1 36.41 et seq.; historic landmark commission, 136.236 et seq. Supp. No 1 162.1 t „F A gendeNo ~ ~ ~ L. Apra fie ADMINISTRATION Nt81 L'U~ ,5 Sec. 2.64. Exceptions, The provisions of this article shall not apply to task forces, ad hoc wmmittees or other commissions established by the city council from time to time to make recommendations with respect to a particular subject or issue and which are not Intended to be permanent in nature. (Code 1966, # 1.24) Secs. 2.88-2.80, Reserved. DIVISION 3, RULES AND PROCEDURES Bea 2.81, DeftnItion, The word "board," "boards," "oommisslon" or "commissions," as used in this division, shall be construed to mean any managerial, adminIstrative or quad Judicial body of persona which has an advisory or deliberative character and whose members are appointed by or serve at the pleasure of the city council, (Code 1986, # 142) Cross reference-Definitions and rules of construction generally, 11.2. Sec. 2.81. Applicability, The provisions of this division shall govern and control the rules, procedures and opera- tion of all boards and the removal of members thereof; provided, however, wherever any provision of the stale constitution, state statutes, the Charter or a city ordinance oonMets or Is inconsistent with any provision of this division, the conflicting or Inconsistent provision of this division shall not be applicable, (Code 1968,1 143) Sec. 283. General rules, (a) Quorum. A quorum for the transaction of business of a board shall be a m*rlty of the members appointed to the board, (b) Voting required, No attending member of a board shall be excused or shall abstain from voting on any matter before the board on which a vote is called or required, except where invoolvodd such membe shall announce such interestW1wit he commencement of oonsid.n on of the matter and such member shall not enter Into discussion or debate on such matter and shall abstain from voting thereon. A member shall be considered to have a personal Interest In a matter whenever any matter before the board could or does 0ect the member's financial interest or those of a business with which the member is associated, Charter reference-Perwnal interest, 114.04. (c) Absences. Every board member shall attend all regularly called and scheduled meet, ings of the board of which he Is a member. The unexcused absence of any board member from more than three (3) regularly r lld and scheduled meetings of the board of which he Is a 183 Aalfda No.l~...s'~ .C~ AgendVem . 02-83 DENTON CODE Date A/ member in any one (1) year or lack of attendance at fifty (50) percent of the number of regular meetings in a year, unless such absence is the result of personal or family, illr:ass or death, $hall be considered "cause," as that term is used in section 14.16 of the Charter, for removal of the member by the city council from such board. (Code 1988, 1 144) Sete. 4.84-9.105. Reserved. ARTICLE IV, BALE OF PROPERTY$ DIVISION 1.OENERALLY Bic. 4.108. Sales of personal property of the city. All sales of worn-out, scrap, obsolete or unused personal property of the city shall be approved by the city council acocrdiig to the probable value of such personal property as estimated by the city manager. (Code 1980,120.1) Sec. 4.107. Impounded property. W Asahorfty to sell. If any impounded property remains unclaimed with the city for a period of thirty (30) days, whether or not the owner or lienholder Is known, the city may utilise such property or it may be gold by the city in the manner provided by this section. Items of personal property, the We of which Is restricted by Vernon's Ann. C.C.P. art. 18.01 et seq, are not subject to the provisions of" section. (b) MOW ojsole. All Was of impounded property sha11 be by public auction and sold to the highest bidder. The director of purchasing shall conduct such auction sales, and if, in the opinion of the director of purchasing, the highest bid on a particular item is'not sufficient, he may refuse the bid and hold the Item far sale at another time. (c) none and place of sots; Wks. After determining the time and place for a public auction, the director of purchasing shall givo notice of the auction by, (1) Advertising In the official newspaper of the city for thew (3) consecutive days, the last publication date to be not lose than sewn (7) days immediately before the date of the auction, and 12) Posting notice of such auction " in tbm (3) public places within the city not lase than sewn (7) days Immediately preosdtng tLi site. The notice of the public auction shall contain the wait time and place of the auction and a description list of the property to be sold. . 'Cr'one reterenee-Finance and taxation gener0y, Ch. 10. State law referenee-Sale or lease of munlcipaVy wined property, V.T.O A., Local Gov- ernment code 1233.001 et seq. 164 N •~fI ♦11/ .N. ♦11♦ .1I •I• I~ 1~1 •1. 1+ l • w AO rd WdaNo.~..._ Agandal - $3 MIKE COCIiRAN Date ~ 61o WEST OAx STREET DENro N, TExA5 762oi July 1, 1993 To: Mayor Castleberry and Members of the City Council Re: O'Neil Ford Marker Dedication Task Force Background: To help plan a formal observance of the renaming of the Civic Center/City Hall complex, the O'Neil Ford Civic Complex, a group of citizens were charged with the responsibility of coordinating the event. The purpose of this dedication ceremony is to help create a greater public awareness of the importance of the work O'Neil Ford in Denton. Ford, a former Denton resident, went on to become the most distinguished and colorful architect that Texas has ever produced. His reputation is international, yet his creative roots can be traced back here to Denton, where he spent his formative years. We are privileged as a community to have many structures left that were designed by Foid it is my hope that through the naming of the O'Neil Ford Civic Complex we can help define our community in a positive way for the rest of the world. This fostering of public awareness can only help in preserving our community treasures and ultimately provide a rich cultural legacy for the future. The Programl The O'Neil Ford Task Force has a number of events planned around the dedication ceremony to help make the occasion more festive and to create a higher profile for the event. Friday, July 30 - 7:00 pm - The formal opening of an exhibit on the works of Ford in Denton. This exhibit is being curated by Ray Gough and will open in the apw East Gallery of the Center for Visual Arts. Saturday, July 31 - 10:00 am - t, formal dedication of the O'Neil Ford Civic Complex will take place at City Hall. A subject 1 A e ApendeNo Apendaltam Dare 7 - 6- rl' S marker on Ford will be unveiled and there will be various G speakers. 11:00 am - Following the marker dedication ceremony, there will be a mini-symposium on Ford and his work in the Council Chambers. various associates of Ford will participate and Bill Mercer of the U.N.T. Center for Texas Studies will moderate. Thit event will be video recorded for broadcast and posterity. 12:00 - Buffet luncheon in the courtyard courtesy Gertrude Gibson (weather permitting). 1:00 to 4:00 pm - Self-guided driving tour of the remaining Ford designed structures in Denton. Guides will be present at some of the public buildings. We will provide maps with the ceremony programs. To help pay for this event i have applied for grants from various entities and individuals. The Historical Society of Denton County is going to give $500. The Center for Texas Studies has offered $400. Most of these funds will go towards mounting the exhibit. The historical marker for the City Hall will cost around $1,100.00 and is of the same design as other historical site markers in the city (Quakertown). Press releases have gone out to numerous statewide publications announcing our plans. We have a media plan for attracting the at.ontion of the metroplex media. The Denton Record Chronicle is very interested in promoting this, and is a co-sponsor of the event. i feel that this will generate positive publicity for our community and perhaps help our citizens to appreciate what we have here in Denton. Respectfully submitted, Rx 4&, Mike Cochran Chairman, O'Neil Ford Marker Dedic:.tion Task Force 2 .w T ,.'.'i.y +Mfh ♦11IIIIi~ F.III.IIi N.I..I.I .S: i ` 0 a r AW68No - 93 Agendalls Date / July 1, 199 C COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: SELECTION OF THE JUVENILE DIVERSION TASK FORCE MEMBERS RECOMMENDATIONt Since the Juvenile Diversion Task Force will be made up of representatives from specific organizations identified by resolution, individuals from the community at large, and the City's staff, it is recommended that the City Council use a threefold process for selecting task force members. We recommend contacting the organizations that are specifically identified in the Diversion Task Force resolution and ask them to recommend names of individuals to participant in the Task Force. Secondly, the City Council could recommend names of individuals to represent local civic organizations, community-based organizations, and at large representatives. Thirdly, the City Manager could appoint individuals from the city staff to participant in the Task Force. However, the City Council should make the final approval of all Task Force members. BACRORODNDt During the Spring, staff was directed by the City Council to immediately implement the basic program required to exercise our jurisdiction over Class C juvenile offenses. To accomplish this, we had to maintain a separate filing system for the records of juvenile cases, meet the sealing requirements of juvenile cases, and hold closed hearings. in addition, juvenile conviction history tracking is very manual intensive. For all of the effort put forward and the resources expended t'ie City currently has very little enforcement capabilities over juvenile cases. Therefore, to evaluate options for improving our enforcement of juvenile cases and involving our community in the process the City Council approved a resolution creating a Juvenile Diversion Task Force (See attachment A). SUMMARYt To proceed with the implementation of the resolution staff needs direction regarding the selection of the members. There are several options available for selecting the members. The first option would be to have the city council select all the members that would participate in the Juvenile Diversion Task Force. The Agenda Nog -0 -1 Agend It " Date - . -03 second option would be to have staff recommend individuals as candidates to participate in the Task Force. The city council could accept or reject the names submitted and request additional submissions or propose their own names for approval. The third option would be to have the specific organizations approved by resolution recommend names of individuals to participate. The final option would be a combination of the above recommendations. The City Council could recommend names of individuals from organizations identified by category and those from the community at large. This include the single representative from local civic organizations, the single representative from community-based organizations, and the three representatives to be appointed at large. The city's staff could contact the organizations specifically identified by resolution and ask them to recommend individuals. In addition, the City Manager could recommend names of individuals who are city employees. To assist in the selection process we have provided attachment B which is the "Directory of Clubs and Organizations" prepared by the Denton Chamber of commerce. PROGRAMSIDEPARTM NTS O GROUPS AFFECTED. The Municipal Judge, Legal Department, Police Department, and the Municipal Court Clerk's office will be affected by the activities of the Juvenile Diversion Task Force. FISH IMPACTt None RESPE LLY SUBMI TED: Lloyd V. Harrell, City 116nager PREPARED BYYtt Harlan L. erson Directo Treasury Operations APPROVED BY: John F. McGrane Executive Director of Finance Wilb Attachments AFT00674 j, ~ E:\W09Cf\REf\,IUVEY.REf E C: T~ ~ r ATTACCIIiMn0A ~ j.. agentlaltem r-~-~~~ ~ rJet9 C' r JC-T~ 'J RESOLUTION NO.,e A RESOLUTION CREATING THE JUVENILE DIVERSION TASK FORCE TO FORMU- LATE AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL RELATING TO THE NEED OF A DIVERSION PROGRAM TO ASSIST IN THE REHABILITATION OF JUVENILE OFFENDERS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Denton has assumed jurisdiction over juv- enile offenders committing certain offenses; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton desires to ex- plore options in order to develop a juvenile justice program con- taining a variety of alternative methods designed to provide ef- fective rehabilitative enforcement and judicial tools for juvenile offenders; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby establishes a Juven- ile Diversion Task Force. SECTION IT. (a) That the Juvenile Diversion Task Force shall review and evaluate the necessity of establishing a Diversion Program for the City of Denton and to submit a report to the city Council which shall include a recommendations of whether the City shall pursue the establishment of this type of program. (b) In the event the Task Force recommends the establishment of a diversion program, the Task Force shall provide recommend- ations to the City Council regarding the following matters: (1) The goals of the Diversion Program; (2) The format of the Diversion Program; (3) A public relations strategy; (4) The anticipated financial impact; and (5) An implementation schedule. SECTION III. That the Juvenile Diversion Task Force shall be composed of nineteen persons to be selected by the City Council from the following groups and organizations: 1 representative selected from the membership of the Denton Independent School District Parent/Teacher Assoc- iation; 1 representative selected from the membership of the Denton Chamber of Commerce; 1 representative a:lected from the membership of a local civic group, club, or organization? } i . ATTACHMENT A, rUn'*. rl _ ^ Agenda No DU I L~ Agen!#i2 Date '111 representative selected from staffinembers of Denton County; 1 representative selected from staffinembers of the Denton Independent School District; 1 representative selected to serve shall be the Municipal Court Judge; 1 representative selected from staffinembers of the Finance Department; 1 representative selected from staffinembers of the office of the City Attorney; 1 representative selected from staffinembers of the Denton Police Department; 1 representative selected from the membership of a community- based organizations 1 representative selected from the membership of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; 1 representative selected from the membership of the League of United Latin American Citizens; 1 representative selected from staffmambers of the Denton County Juvenile Probation Department; 1 representative selected from the membership of the Denton County Bar Association; 1 representative selected from the membership of Concerned Parents organization; 1 representative selected from the Denton Independent School District student body; and 3 representatives at large appointed by the City Council. SECTION IV, That the City Council shall designate the Chair- person of this Task Force SECTION y. That in the event any of these listed organiza- tions express a desire to not participate in this Task Force, the City Council may select representatives of other organizations to serve on this Task Force. SECTION yi. That this resolution shall be affective immed- iately upon its passage and approval. PAGE 2 • ATTACHMENT A co t. +ge~daNo 4geoaalle 7 ~Date '7 - G - 93- g e-" K "~7S PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of L10- , 1993. BO CASTLEBERRY, MAYO ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY ,r CLA I ~42'1 BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: C PAGE 3 .y~.,• a 7.1 .'l1a5, 111 ~l~~;'14:P ~n`•.Jirk Yf ','+~'/.i!f^ YI" 'f r w,N .;yi 'sr 1 ",(•,a Iii r'♦:.". If ttr_ `ry'~f' -?~ct.;ll 1 #a ,Y'S~'t~~, r'• "R' M1 A I IV'$., f 1 § 1 11 a r w in I Y i e f. J,({• I t Yi e 1 'J 1 tat.^. o { ^,t,~ Y r ~tfa ~'y~~5;~'~` `fix ~ I S' } 1r Tkt ~ ~S'Yy"'"yi •1 id r J e{ V J r C + ~~t j~24 t}f)yk ply r v f t } ~yi r/{i ',4 fir.#, , ;~'.rgdd~'r 1 +1 I r=• ! rl r 1 I } T r r 41~.t' i! • t t c'- r' c v~ir xla rr 1 JJ' 1 ~}Srf J'~ 1y y~j`![~w11w't'{ L Tr\ Intl[. ryy *i•' 1 {r t II I a ~'r'! .k'> Sl ti~ Y ' "1 ~r.+ ip S~"~ ~f~r~ • i Y 5.+~ "i( vK'rJ'4~ I 'i`~#, I l,t Jt r II ,,r I a Ii~tSIF ♦j r7Y~r 1! jfp ~ i J: z/ wY 4 S` `Cyy'~~Yi !a t/ e+ 4 r ! , L. I J 1l a 7. J ]C~JIrIS 71 j1~ .'ln al -w. IJr e. . IF ~pI of 1 t ti L}i k rya M {l / ^ r x ,t r'Lr ~.x•, $y'~ C )t: 5 + wn l Y: rJ.l. ~ L J t 1 C 1 /J 3y ~ b e~7{(Y$~'Wq,'.~ i t ~ 1. 1 o i' 'r l~' 1{~• 11 t ..I I it 1~er,~`4 RY +♦i `'i*'' ' i rJ y'••` yr'i K I ^.~i Y1"rI A1VT~t~!^Yt P [t ~~v`w k`!WI 1, J ~ , ~T..i a ~~n. Y I) H~.. }r~ y ],CS' ~ I•r )~1 xM~ i Ij 1II „ I s, Dlrectoryt,of `},'1,.. tit l~~l{i hC ~1 ,r J.lh tx flr~+' IF$i. ~It +~I 1 i i 4 fP ~``t tJ'. ' Y ~rIS 9'f rY' .n ` t FrtP ~ ~ 4r Lx } ~ r 4' a (t 12 ( r D ~d t )~C d! l+ 1y~ itrs"I~~a W rr1 iJ F f,, rt,,a k, LyfJ r. t e Y'. ` ~tf it 1c}' 1 7 y 15~ IF . a 1`J 4 .1 a)z J C r ,'L 3T •df y' i 7', r:,W' t r 1 1 1 f~'clubs r~wt~JT^~'~i,,` I~)}t .J+4'S~Grf'R+''?:.ILA. Fi ~ r } 1 a, S,~gy~1 i.' ~✓y ~k, t r s 1 ''P ' ~ Sly ~:n~Yl tlr~ f*4~ ~il~y~M~a~ ~Y 'yh}~18 }d ~Cl f k t~~~ 4: la 1. Orl {.va 4 Y~ ~S L0 4 av}~, 4 + 5 . r , ~'1 tF h tlt~'°`J[,{ e+ '.V 1~ N t~y+Y ! I ~ + T .t ka 1% ~IC~"r.' Mf ~Y.a~ 6 1 ~ d t°~~ al ' . {i r N~{ IF, F,ip. 71. la'.<~ ' ','~~IF~I}1.1~~:.l~ii}1~'~}~TT~•~ r ~"~a ~~~~+1~hJi~ ~r! ~~j it•. l~V~~• Y ~CC`' y~y( 5F I~E.iL4~ P9 =yf~la~Y~r1~t } '"iJ t~ J >~~.ar i.~ t F ~ ,y ' k t,/NJ i~A♦♦N IS'1~~ ~ ~'L,{ r a a t r, 1 CI er ,'{a,♦wA' ° 1T11xY r1' r'Iy F' a;~lY r 1k~.'SY i r:r +L IF ~~~'444 1 t~ x••;~ y 1Yt'1f yt9 >fi!•f4 II N 1'a . " 1 ~.a11 df~ r I rl AFP, Denton.chamber,of!`Co`mmerce n IC 1 'o,, oa u~ g AP; { 7z ♦ N ! ' t ,~~{aa,, t y~11 Y{^ ~ 1^psr,,a[f~~~~G 1{~ ta'L C1, ( , 'n',CL . I 1 ! , }bYxt~x, 11~'Y7gx! ~LL;117i Cx in } S rl I ~h7xA aA s ?f e r r' S~'t lal ♦y'~ x:, ~~1~y-iJ~t~ r tl, + ♦ Sir r.\ 1 !r i I tr ii t r p 1 r 1 1 f '..r* jQendaNo Agendaftem ~J ALUMNI OROAWATIONB Date -ky ' g Leadership Denton Alumni Texas Teoh Ex-Btudents Denton Chamber of Commerce David Boston Mike Bates 300 El Pasco 500 N. Bell Ave # 211 Denton, TX 76205 Denton, TX 76201 387-7572 (H) 387-6358 (H) 382-7752 (W) 387-4881 (W) Mortar Board Alumaas TIM Alumnae Association Greta Hughes Miller Mary Ann MacDuff Rt. 1 Box 353 Academic Affairs/TWU P.O.22965 Sanger, TX 76266 Denton, TX 76204-0965 817/726-3627 (H) 817/458-5297 W 898-3310 W sigma Alpha Iota University of North Texas Kathy Joyner Alumni Associatiou 20 Christie Ln. Nancy White Krum, TX 76249 P.O. Box 13557 817-482-6521 (H) Denton, TY 76203-3557 387-5327 (11) 565-2900 (W) Texas Exec UT at Austin - Denton Chapter Rod McLain / Chuck Arnold 382-4636 (H) 5108 Wildwood Dr. 381-9530 (W) Flower Mound, TX 75028 214/724-8104 (H) ARTS OROANISATICIff Altrusa Club of Denton Denton Civic Ballet Nancy Knitt Susan Friday 1003 Hopkins P.O. Box 1791 Denton, TX 76205 Denton, TX 76202 382-2229 (W) 566-0596 (W) Ariel Club Denton Community Band June Berry Carol Lynn Mizell 2145 Savannah Trail 2722 Crestwood Place Denton, TX 76205 Denton, TX 76201 387-3311 (H) 367-6918 (H ?82-3451 (W~ 434-3887 (Metro) The Arts Guild Denton Community Chorus Jayne Withers Dick Fulton 2141 Pembrook 6 Highview Ct. Denton, TX 76205 Denton, TX 76205 382-1696 (H) 362-3919 (H) 565-0855 (W) Denton Bach Society Denton Community Orchestra Carol Kernels Michael Kelley P.O. Box 92 1914 Mercedes Denton, TX 76202 Denton, TX 76205 382-1057 H 566-5704 566-2291 ~W; 1 y.: 1 i a~endaNo.<< ~ ~pandaltem Date..- ct_3 Denton Community Theater International Folk Dance Company Julie Angelo Gladys M. Keeton P.O. Box 1931 P.O. Box 23747 Denton, TX 76202 Denton, TX 76204 382-7014 (W) 898-2085 (W) Denton Handweavers Guild Borth Texas area art League Dr. Mabel E. Maxey Claude Cheek 2215 N. Locust St. P.O. Box 281 Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76202 382-2078 (H) 817/455-7415 H 817/455-7408 ~W Denton Light Opera Company TRU Community Dance Center Helen Dewey Reikofski Gladys M. Keeton 1625 Victoria P.O. Box 23747 Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76204 387-5364 (H) 898-2085 (W) Denton Quilt Guild TWU Dance Repertory 'theatre Deniece Taylor Adrienne D. Fisk 425 IoOF P.O. Box 23747 Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76204 387-2346 (H) 817/497-6107 (H) 898-2085 W) Greater Denton Arts Council Herbert Holl 207 S. Bell Denton, TX 76201 382-2787 (W) CHORCH ORaA TIONS Association of Christian woman Denton saptiet Association Carol Riddlesperger Bill Tinsley 1908 Panhandle 3311 1 35 North Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76205 382-8757 (H) 383-3544 (W) Christian Business a Professional Denton Christian Women's Club Women Keitha Warren Dee Barnes 259 Jeter 1835 N. Locust Argyle, TX 76226 Denton, TX 76201 817/464-3186 (H) 382-0790 H) 566-1888 ~W) Church Secretaries Association Denton County Cooperative of Denton County uinistries Claudene Barber Susan Edwards P.O. Box 1565 3311 I 35 North Denton, TX 76202 Denton, TX 76205 817/464-0186 H 382-1913 (W) 382-3797 ~W; 2 K, Y Agenda No Apendallenilfl~ Date ? ~1 peatoa Ministers Association Presbyterian wows Bev, John M. eraly Mary Evelyn Huey 1270 crescent 1114 W. University Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201 703-3934 (H) 382-9458 (H) 387-3894 (W) tasaculate Conception Altar Women's Aglow Fellowship society Diana Lookabaugh Colleen Mitchell 2 Highview Circle 1215 H. Elm Lenton, TX 76205 417/437-2223 (H)01 566-2686 (H) :6 566-6550 (W) EDUCATIOHA>' ORG~WT~~T*nua s4M university Motherst club Dianne Mayfield Denton 8 oa Association 214/436-4491 (H) Doroth Watts y watts g 2720 Mill Pond Denton, TX 76201 p 387-7832 (H) Amoco. of TZ Professional D338 Bronco eoa4ter Club r4ucatora Ron Crownover Maurine Richards 3710 Grenada Trail 1517 Victoria Denton, TX 76205 Denton, TX 76201 382-0729 H 107-7502 (W) 817/497-4044 (W; : Denton Area Reading Association DIED Volunteer Advisory Board 1111 Johnson 1007 Colt Bob Hardaway 909 Linden Denton, , T TX 76201 381-2 Denton, TX 76201 902 (H) 387-6025 'c Oeoton Area Retired Teachers Association iateraatioaal Student i J205 Cole Scholar Office 1781T 1205 Hillcrest Rebecca Meyer or Linda Capps Denton, TX P.O. Box 13795 47-2183 (H) 76201 Denton, TX 76203 565-2201 Oeeton Aasoo. for the Zducation at Young Children Liberty Christian PTA Z Sarah Essex Ann Stacy P.O, gox 23029 214/638-3311 (W) f' Oent~3~1 TX 76204 498- (W) Jean S chaake County PTA Council LUL71O 24 Timber grean circle Frank Davila Denton, T 76205 P.O. Box 2387 382.4082 {}1) Denton, TX 76202 387-6151 (W) 3 NINA No ApeadalterrLl~ "41 Dote Nusio Teachers Association Gladys Lawhon Texas Licensed Child Care 2422 Nottingham Association Denton, TX 76201 Ed or Sara Terry 382-8563 808 Sherman Denton, TX 76201 Texas Association Of parents 382-1211 (W) 6 Educators for the Deaf Janette Majors 1212 Hickory Creek Denton, TX 76205 383-8881 Denton Council of vardan Clubs Sue Ann Fagan Ken's Garden Club 2016 Bernard John Knesek Denton, TX 76205 211 Goodson way 387-2398 (H) Denton, TX 76205 566-6618 jH) Denton Orchid Society 898-2351 W) Claude Cheek Wative plant society of Texas "16 FM 1830 Trinity Forks chapter Argyle, TX 76226 Shelly Angel 817/455-7415 H) Pool BOX 23552 817/435-7408 ~W) Denton, TX 76204 The yirst African violet 382-1200 (H) society Oaks Garden Club Glennis Crouch Elisabeth Garcia 2012 Locksle 1509 Broadway Denton, TX 76205 Dentcn,. TX 76201 382-4222 (H) 387-0800 (H) Garden culture club Fat Dodson plant i Pray Garden Club 1207 Meadow Ridge Martha Bartel Denton, TX 76201 928 SROkerise Circle 382-8920 (H) Denton, TX 76205 Moos i $ope Garden Club 382-4222 (H) Mrs. Bob Storrie Litlight Garden club 600 Magnolia Littia Grooms Denton, TX 76201 1001 Live Oak 565-0008 (H) Denton, TX 76201 Lily Garden Club of Denton 382-9429 (H) Batty Kimble Denton keTX 76205 382-4068 (H) 4 AQ0W8 NO Agendalt , . Date - HISTORICAL ORGANIZATION Daughters Of the American Denton County Genealogical Revolution society Dr. Louise Alton Mary Lajean Sherrill P.O. Box 1913 387-7474 Denton, TX 76202 387-8934 (H) Daughters of the Republic Denton County Historical of Texas Commission and Nuaeam Gaynelle Neale Norma Lynn Gamble 2106 Southridge P.O, sox 2600 Denton, TX 76205 Denton, TX 76202 383-2105 (H) 387-8073 (W) HUNAN AND SOCIAL AERVICEA American Association American Heart Association of Retired Persons (HARP) Gaylan Park Hal Frazier 382-3033 (H) 2500 Hinkle f205C Denton, TX 76201 387-1648 (H) AIDS/Denton, Inc. American Red Cross Paul King Frank E. Hebb P.O, Sox 13427 316 Dallas Drive Denton, TX 76203 214/317 82707(H)g 383-3540 (W) 382-6323 W Adult Children of Alcoholics Armes Haven Hospice 201 S. Locust, Rm. 108 Auxiliary Denton, TX 76201 Dixie Clardy 382-5478 216 W. Mulberry Denton, TX 76201 382-5939 (HJ 566-6550 (W Alcoholics Anonymous sig srothers a sisters shalom* Today Group Sandra DAbles allas 5011 W. University Denton, TX 76201 D383-4441 enton, TX 76205 566-9110 (W) Americas Cancer society birth Right Of Denton Stacy Burkhalter Cyndi Van Igen 120 S. Carroll 1215 N. Elm Denton, TX 76201 Denton' TX 76201 387-6300 (W) 383-2626 5 Abend 11e ~ Dale L 'r Compassionate Friends of Denton Widowed Persons Morth Texas Frances Rodgers Shirley Ottman 1406 Churchill 415 Mimosa Denton, TX 76201 76201 367-5248 (W) Dentont T(H) 387 easupport Group crisis intervention Sotline Emptyecradle Sonia Hecht P.O. Box 2632 Rt. 2 Box 633 M Denton, TX 76202 Denton, TX 76208 898/1427 8Hotline 387-5921 ~W) Denton Area Vegetarians Families fiPaoli*swith Patty Park 383-3858 (H) 1919 H. Elm Denton, TX 76201 382-3262 (H) Denton County campfire Fibronyaigqis support Shirley Hensley Gayle Backstrom 919 S. Carroll 1302 382-0415 Denton, TX 76201 387-5661 (H) 382-0322 W Denton County Friends of the Robert Grandparent prcJsct Family Donna Clayton or Cheryl Sutterfield P.O. Sox 368 P.O. Box 623 Denton, TX 76202-0368 Denton, TX 76202 387-3831 ext. 5103 214/219-2829 (Metro) 387-5131 W) Denton County Probation Foster Parents of Denton Advisory Council county Lloyd Webb Meiody•Rockwell P.O. Box 1604 214/221-3910 (W) Denton, TX 76202 566-1402 (W) Denton Humane society Gina Gohlke P.O. Box 1972 Denton, TX 76202 382-PETS (W) 6 i r Agenda No 4pend~lt ~ Oete L_ _ ' Goadvill Industries of Denton Retired senior Volunteer program 2030 W. Universit Merridee McClatchy Y 1400 Crescent, Suite 7 Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201 566-0398 383-1508 (W) Grandparents Raising Grandchildren salvation Army Peggy Warren Police station 382-7163 (H) 221 N. Elm Denton, TX 76201 566-8182 (W) La Loch* League services program for Aging Needs Carol Eblen (SPAN) 305 W. Sycamore Al Murdoch Denton, TX 76201 1800 Malone 383-0417 (H) Denton, TX 76202 382-2224 (W) Hothmrs Against Drunk Driving Smokers Rights (NADD) Denton County Chapter Helen Clark Rt. 2, Box 312 C 566-3920 (H) Argyle, TX 76226 387-8814 (W) Narcotics Anonymous United Way of Denton County Better Late Than Never N.A. Pat Gobble 381-9128 525 N. Locust Denton, TX 76201 566-5851 North Texas Area Polio Survivors Weight Watchers Teri Rheault Southridge Center 604 Coronado 2435 1 35 E. /246 Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76205 387-3164 (H) 1/800/792-1126 overeaters Anonymous Women, infants i Children Jamie or Cindy Program P.O. Box 124 Amanda Goff Denton, TX 76203 300 N. Carroll, Suite B. 566-6489 (H) Denton, TX 76201 565-1828 (H) 566-8665 (W) Progpossive Club Birder Johnson 1200 Duncan Denton, TX 76201 382-3437 (H) 7 49endaNo Agenda [to Goo ![aDIC71L OliafM*~~iwrnr. ~y~t / Denton County Medical society Janet Denton Regional xediaal Box 50716 McDaniel Center Volunteer Auxiliary Denton, TX 76206 Dotti Hagen 566-3923 (W) 4405 North I 35 Denton, TX 76201 566-4044 (W) Denton County xedical Society united Cetomy Association LoYceiWsi Wiip Wilson Monica David oyce 111 Strittmatter 15 Timbergreen e tons TX 76 Pilot Point, TX 76258 382-2937T(H)76205 817/686-2463 (H) Denton Diabetic Association Mrs. roneen Haisler 4500 N. Locust Denton, TX 76207 387-9179 (H) 1R1/COlttt~ t n*...- Dsntoa County greeting ry Horn Ma Deatoa lhroomerIs Club P.O. Box 50582 Cori Kunz Denton, TX 76206 164 Chapparal Estates 566-5959 (H) Denton, TX 76205 817/497-3677 Denton Newcomer's Bridge Lois Siler global interact 2313 Yorkshire O' Yospitaiity program Denton, TX 76201 Laura Dam 565-1404 (H) P.O. Box 13795 Denton, TX 76203 565-2195 American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Denton County Democrats Paul Thetford Ted Lewis P-O. Box 5022 301 Dallas Drive Suite 120 Denton, TX 76203 Denton, TX 76204 H 382-3028 (W) 566-3014 J1165 W ~ (LocalTchapterrof aa 566- @*Clair Denton County Republicans political i environmental Carl Martin "uetainability group) 1222 Grove Sharon Withoy Lewisville, TX 75067 566-1277 (H} 214/436-5360 (H) 8 .Veda No Agenda r- Date ~2s. Denton County Taxpayers Assoc., Inc. League of Women Voters Faye Hughes Sondra Ferstl p. 0. Box 3027 P.O. Sox 24945 Denton, TX 76202 Denton, TX 76202 387-1443 (H) 363-3775 387-3012 W Denton Republican Women'* Club National organisation for Shirley Spellerbarg Women (Denton county chapter) 3621 Lynchburg Valerie Blankenship Corint , TX 76208 383-3733 (H) 817/497-4792 (H) Jody Smith Xemorial Republican Women+s Club Janice Freeman 631 Sunset Court Argyle, TX 76226 817/464-3436 (H) MrZ88I0NAL OROANIIaTIOMB American Business Womeaes Denton County Industrial Association safety Association Linda Kinnison Glenn Stockard 2301 Oak Park Dr. Denton, TX 76201 381-0520 (H) Business a professional women - Denton County Legal secretaries Eveniaq Club Association Hazel Frederick Cay McSpedden 1309 Panhandle 134 Terrace Road Denton, TX 76201 Sanger, TX 76266-9780 382-8638 (H) 817/458-7610 H 566-8139 ~W; Business i professional Women - Denton County Veterinary Noon Club Medical Association Peggy Lowery Dr. Neighbors 14 Rollinq Nills 2720 James Street Denton, TX 76205 Denton, TX 76205 383-4256 383-3731 (W) Denton Central Business Denton Aire Fighters Association District Association Ken Gold Millard Heath P.O. Box 2534 P.O. Box 3017 Denton, TX 76202 Denton, TX 76202 387-7901 (W) 383-1688 (W) Denton county Bar Association Debra Drayovich 215 E. McKinney Denton, TX 76201 566-8333 (W) 9 I r . ~9flda N0, , AgeaGa~t 5 ~ Denton Personnel Association j Mike Harramore Professional seorstari s P-O- Box 2704D International Denton, TX 76202 Lisa Hack 214/394-5610 p.0. Box 453 Krum, 76249 Terry entoa Brantle Toastmasters Refrigeration Service Engineers 2106 Terry Robin Wilson Denton, TX McCormick 76205 1841 S. Nayhill Dent 387:2569 Denton, TX 76201 387 9876 382-4034 (Hj Greater Denton Board of Realtors 382-2014 W) Linda Zachary Tetas Society of professional 1005 H. Elm engineers Denton, TX 76201 Zse'Allison 387-8212 (W) Route a Box 95 Denton, TX 76201 380-9453 (H) 383-7194 (W) Association i Apartmeat Builders United COYercial Tra7e1er8 Fred Gossett of America Ftt 600 S. Elm Rita or W.O. Bis61 hop Denton, TX 76201 3900 Denton, TX Teasley 76205 566-2480 (W) 382-5083 (H) =nterL&tionai Credit Association West T83 Anita Ferguson Legal services P.0- Box 369 Earlean Murphy Denton, TX 76202 121 W. Hickory 381-9558 (W) Denton, TX 76201 383-140b (W} Professional In-Rome Child Care 4 women's Council of Realtors 1420 Brandywine Br Scott Jack Jenkins 1andywine Denton, TX 76201 2220 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 110 565-1960 Denton, TX 76205 (W) 387-7167 9 382-1411 ~W# Bay scouts America Dan Richardson The Celtic society a Celtic 919 S. Carroll Dancers Denton, TX 76201 Leon Tribble 565-9139 (H) P.C. Box 24904 382-5450 (W) Denton, TX 76204 387-8879 (H) 10 Agenda No, Agepd "I, M- circle of children's Authors Denton Early Auto Club Jacqualins Stem Earl Mayo 2104 Foxcroft 382-6643 Denton, TX 76201 387-8696 (H) cross Timbers Girl scout Council Denton Junior optimist Judo Judy McMillian club 4000 W. Vnivorsity Mike Woodson Denton, TX 76201 310 S. Elm 382-5134 (H) Denton, TX 76201 382-8710 (W) Denton Area Xodel Railroad Club Denton Junior Optimist Karate Bob Ticknor club 321 E. McKinney Mika Woodson Denton, TX 76201 310 S. Elm 382-9775 (M) Denton, TX 76201 566-8270 W) 382-8710 (W) Denton Astronomical Society Denton Outdoor Club John Love Ross Fens 225 Green Spring circle 1001 Parvin Sanger, TX 76266 Denton, TX 76205 817/458-7479 (W) 566-8136 (H) Denton Be s Baseball Denton Quilt Guild Patty Was? 387-2346 382-3485 Denton County Amateur Radio Denton Soccer Association Association Jana Malone Gerald Merchant P.O. Box 184 P.O. Box 50433 Denton, TX 76202-0184 Denton, TX 76206-2314 382-3964 (H) 387-2314 (H) Denton County Archers Denton Ts,%nis Association Carl Dane Russ Bufkins P.O. Box 328 2212 Woodbrook Aubrey, TX 76227 Denton, 'TX 76205 817/365-2677 382-69(,1 (W) Denton County 4-E Denton uomea+s Bowling Association Eddie Baggs Rose Moore 101 E. McKinney #206 3610 Macbey Denton, TX 76208 Denton, TX 76201 017/497-3939 566-3607 I 11 Agenda No T Agendalte 1 - Date ~ ,C Girl scouts of the 0.86A. North Texas Pair Association James Roden Carol Roberts P.O. Box 1695 1000 W. University Denton, TX 76202 392-6961 T(W)76201 380-9521 (H) Denton , 387.2632 (W) Golden Triangle Chili Pod North Texas)sbootsrs Association Jim Griffin 76201 Blvd. Denton, Tx Carroll 1914 N. 383-2821 Island Divers Top Tin Auto Club 1704 N. Elm Emory Groaning or Denton, TX 76201 Larry Davison 383-DIVE 382-9931 Emory 214-221-5188 Larry soa-smokers Bridge Club Triangle squarms 1112 Palmwood Place 116 (Square and Round Dancing) Denton, TX 76201 Toby Thomason 387-5292 382-6609 Worth Texas Cbapter of Studebaker Dick of Denton Drivers Riney Fritz Po a 1117 Dent On, Riney 76207 2515 Hartley 382-2515 (W) Denton, TX 76208 North Texas Chess Club Michael Borys 1515 Broadway Denton, TX 76201 566-3029 (H) American Legqion Post 171 Denton Benefit: League Dr. Warren Casay Lisa Patterson 1910 Emerson 1309 Gatewood Denton, TX 76201 Den 6660 (H)76201 387-4040 (H) benevolent order of Biks Denton Blue Ribbon Club 12446 Weldon Burgoon Glenn Selman 345 E. Hickory 226 E. Oak 82t nI TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201 382-5310 (W) 12 agenda No Agend~ j NO ! -~---1--- c j C,-. Denton Composite squadron Lions Club Autill"7 Air fartrol Francis Honk Maj. Lealand Dean 825 Aileen 1220, Linden Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201 383-1493 (H) 382-2594 (W) Denton 1001 1 02 Lions Club - Breakfast Roy Stewrt Jan Carrington P.O. Sox 54 2912 Bristol Denton, TX 76202 Denton, TX 76201 362-6622 (W) 382-4316 (H) 382-1941 W) Denton Eiranis Club - Breakfast Lions TClubs U-Noon John Tompkins Winds 2415 Royal Acres 1310 Denton Winds 76201 Denon, 82t3538T(H)76201 387-7367 (H) 3 Denton xixanis Club - soon Rational Association of Joyce Georgqa Retired federal Bmployoes #41s Soo N. P911 Avenue, #211 Wm.B. Stephens i Denton, TX 76201 2011 Mistywood 387-6323 Denton, TX 76201 382-6049 Denton Lions Club optimist club - evening Jim Heath D.L. Pau ht gg 600 Haadlee 1900 Cordoll TX 76201 Denton, 76201 Denton, , 3465 (H) i 382-2131 ( (H) Denton folios wives Association Cutest Club Noon Janet Stockard 207 W. HiBrown ckory, Suits 100 P.O. Box 2112 Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76202 381-0201 382-2566 (H) Jaycees of Denton pytbian sisters, Temple #is Rhonda Collister Helen McGovern 121 p,0. Box 100 Forest Denton, TX 76202 Den ton, TX 76201 382-5421 (W) 382-6275 (H) heights of Columbus 14771 Rotary Club - soon Gene Hartman Mark Hannah 1116 Fry P.O. Box 1622 Donton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76202 387-6036 (W) 382-8578 382-5295 (H) knights of Pythias, Alan Rota Nel Cson south Bin Lodge 130 ordova J.M. Jones 517 Corlon 387-0455 Denton, TX 76201 566-0266 ;W} 13 44epdaNo. lte 4 4penda r . pate ' The soroptiaist Club veterans of lorsiga Ware ''L0(40 S Nets Stallings lost 2203 1800 Broadway Donald E. Petro or Bill Wilde Denton, TX 76201 909 Sunset 382-0486 (H) 3887-2265T(Lodgs)1 Stanfield Masonic Lodge +217 Veterans of Poreign Wars _ George Wood Ladies ausillary 316 Highland Bonnie Wilde Denton, TX 76201 909'Sunset 382-5555 (H) Denton, TX 76201 387-6073 (W) 387-2205 (Lodge) Triangle Lions Club Nelda Kieser 1903 Mercedes Denton, TX 76205 382-3700 (H) XOKIM18 ORGANISATIONS Alpha Gaama Delta Denton Alnanas Panhellenic Lisa Adams Molly Hook air Patsy Patterson 1300 S. Hatcher 2215 Loop 288 0400 Decatur, TX 76234 Denton, TX 76205 817/657-9022 383-2520 (W) Aserioan A880Oiation of Denton Delta Game University Women Jane Boone P.O. Box 362 497-3636 (H) Denton, TX 76202 seta Sigma Phi Denton GrandsothOC08 Club Sharon Husy Ola Brodie Rt. S, Box 140 H 719 Ector Denton, TX 76208 Denton, TX 76201 382-5263 (H) 387-7103 Delta Kappa dasma Intl Denton Rebsoca Lodge !18 Iota Iota Ethel Wood Sydney Braswell 1812 Cordell 383-2166 (H) Denton, TX 76201 387-6692 (H) Delta Pilots Wives Club spsilon sigma Alpha Lynn Thompson Kathy Fischer 2121 Woodbrock 2324 Green Oaks Denton, TX 76205 Denton, TX 76201 566-4855 (H) 387-6636 (H~ 565-3888 W 14 I npendaNo C-J~_ ! Agenda It Extension zoueasker clubs b Urea E. Davis 1lebeaoa'Le4ge +24 241 of Denton County Leona McDaniel Barbara Fowler P.O. Sox 35 101 E. McKinney 1206 Denton TX 76202 Denton, TX 76201 382-8626 (H) 566-3607 (W) Lemma Phi Preceptor Gamma Pi-Seta sigma Phi Shirley Fergerson Ann 8tumbau h 1122 Woodmount 19 Oak Bond g ' Denton, TX 76201 Denton TX 76201 :83-8116 (H) 387-0666 (H) Gamma Pi Chapter of Texas Rxtension Homemakers seta sigma Phi Barbara Fowler Shirley Ferguson 101 E. McKinney, Suite 206 1122 Woodmount Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201 566-3607 383-t,:16 (H) General Federation of Theta Kappa Chapter of women+s Clubs seta sigma Phi Louise Alton Lisa Keen Hitch P.O. Sox 1913 565-1188 (H) Denton, TX 76202 387-8934 (H) General Shakespeare Club Theta Phi Chapter of the Texas Jo Willvorn state Council of B.S.A. int. 825 Windsor Elaine Moto Denton, TX 76201 515 Pearl 387-6738 (H) Denton, TX 76201 383-1836 (H) 387-1300 (W) Kappa Delta TWU Facult wives Nancy Brookshire Holcomb Mrs. Howard Erdman 2403 Royal Acres 302 Texas Denton, TX 76201 Denton, TX 76201 387-8687 (H) 387-5653 (H) Kappa Kappa Gamma women of The University of Paula Verlinq North Texas 113 Sleepy Hollow Carol Richmond Lewisville, TX 75067 3306 Cactus Circle 214/317-8601 (H) Denton, TX 76201 382-2285 (H) Mothers of Xultiples zi Nu of Beta Sigma Phi Helen Welborn Betty Hod e 1319 E. Sherman 387-6649 141 Denton, TX 76201 898-3444 383-1807 (H) Order of the Eastern star Eupha Wood 2409 Sherwood Denton, TX 76201 382-5555 (H) 15 I Venda No - - Apenda4tem c,, we IliDlZ CLUB HAn PAG! S ALM University Mothers' Club 3 AIDS/Denton, Inc. 5 Adult Children o! Alcoholics 5 Alcoholics Anon Gus 5 Al ha Gamma Delta 14 Al ruse Club of Denton 1 American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) 5 American Association of University Women 14 American Business Women's Associa ion 9 American Cancer Society a American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) 5 American Heart Association 12 American Le Lon Post 071 5 American Red Cross Ann's Haven Hospice Auxiliary 1 Ariel Club 1 Arts Guild, The 2 Association of Christian Women Association of Texas Professional Educators 13 Benevolent Order of Elks 02446 4 Beta Sigma Phi 14 'Big Brothers & Sisters Birth Right of Denton 5 15 Boy Scouts of America Business Z Professional Women - Evening Club 9 Business i Professional Women - Noon Club to Celtic sociaty i Celtic Dencars fThe) Christian Business i Professions Women 2 Church Secretaries Association of Denton County 2 Circle of Children's Authors 16 Compassionate Friends of North Texas 6 Crisis Intervention Hotline 6 Cross Timber Greens 11 Cross Timbers Girl Scout Council 5 Daughters of the American Revolution 5 Daug9hters of the Republic of Texas Delta Ka pa Gamma Int'1 (iota Iota) 14 Delta Pilots Wives Club 14 Denton Alumnae Panhellenic 14 3 Denton Area Model Railroad Club 11 Denton Area Reading Association Denton Area Retired Teachers Association 36 Denton Area Vegetarians li Denton Astronomical Society Denton Assoc. for the Education of Young Children 3 Denton Bach Society 2 Denton Baptist Association 12 Denton Benefit League 12 Denton Blue Ribbon Club 11 Denton Boys Baseball Denton Central Business District Association 9 Denton Christian Women's Club 1 Denton Civic Ballet 1 Denton Community Band • V S J ag - j- enda Na -'JJ L Agendalte Date Denton Community Chorus 1 Denton Community Orchestra a Denton Community Theater Denton Composits Squadron Civil Air Patrol 1 Denton Council of Garden Clubs 4 14 Denton County Amateur Radio Association 11 Denton County Archers 9 Denton County Bar Association 9 Denton County Campfire Denton County Cooperative Ministries 8 Denton County Democrats 1 Denton County 4-H 11 Denton County Friends of the Family 3 Denton County Genealogical Society 8 Denton County Greeting s Denton County Historical Museum Denton County industrial safety Association 9 Denton County toqal secretaries Association 98 Denton County Medical Society 8 Denton County Medical society Auxiliary 3 Denton County PTA Council 3 Denton County Probation Advisory Council 8 Denton County Republicans 9 Denton County Taxpayers Association, inc. Denton County Veterinary Medical Association 14 Denton Delta Gamma 8 Denton Diabetic Association 11 Denton Early Auto Club 3 Denton Education Association 9 Denton Fire Fighters Association 4 Denton Grandmothers' Club 14 Denton Handweavers Guild 6 Denton.Humans Society Denton 100? / 82 13 11 Denton Junior Optimist Judo Club 11 Denton Junior Optimist Karate Club 13 Denton Kiwanis Club - Breakfast 13 Denton Kiwanis Club - Noon 3 Denton Light Opera 13 Denton Lions Club 3 Denton Ministers Association 8 Denton Newcomer's Bridge 8 Denton Newcomer's Club 4 Denton Orchid Society 11 Denton Outdoor club Denton Personnel Association 10 Denton Police Wives Association 13 Denton Quilt Guild 11 Denton Rebecca Lod is $18 1S Denton Regional Medical Center 8 Denton Republican Women's Club ii Denton Soccer Association Denton Tennis Association 11 10 Denton Toastmasters 6 Denton Widowed Persons ii Denton Women's Bowling Association 3 DHS Bronco Booster Club 3 Dist) Volunteer Advisory Board 3 Empty Cradle Support Group t ApendaNo AQend Its Date Epsilon Sigma Alpha 15 Extension Homemaker Clubs of Denton County 15 families of People with Emotional Disorders 6 Fibromyalgia Support 4 First a::+can Violet Society (The) 6 Foster Grandparent Project 6 Foster Parents of Denton County 15 Gamma Phi 15 Gamma Phi Chapter of Beta Sigma Phi 4 Garden Culture Club 15 General Federation of women's Clubs 15 General Shakespeare Club 12 Girl Scouts of the U.S.A. S Global Interact UNT Hospitality Program ~ Golden Triangle Chili Pod 12 Goodwill Industries 7 Gran parents Raising Grandchildren 7 Greater Denton Arts Council SO Greater Denton Board of Realtors 4 Hoe :uHope Garden Club Nome i Aartment Builders Association 10 Immalata Conception Altar Society 13 International Credit Association 2 international Folk Dance Comny International Student i Schopalar Office UNT 3 13 Island Divers 13 Jaycees of Denton Jody Smith Memorial Republican Women's Club 15 Kappa Delta Sorority (Denton Alumnae) Kappa Kappa Gamma 11 Kniqhts of Columbus #4771 13 Knigghts of Pythias, Elm Lodge #30 3 LULAC 7 La I.eache i.aaque 1 Leadership Denton Alumni 9 League of Women Voters 3 Liberty Christian PTA 4 Lily Garden Club of Denton 13 Lions Club Auxilis 13 Lions Club Breakfas 13 Lions Club Hi-Noon 4 Hen's Garden Club 1 Mortar Board Alumnae 7 Mothers Against Drunk Driving 15 Mothers of Multiples 4 Music Teachers Association 7 Narcotics Anonymous National Assoc. of Retired Federal Employees 0618 13 National organization for Women (Denton county) 9 Native Plant Society, Trinity Forks Chapter 4 2 Non-Smokers Bridge ub 1 North Texas Area Art League 7 North Texas Area Polio Survivors North Texas Chapter of Studebaker Drivers 1Z 12 North Texas Chess Club North Texas Fair Association 12 4 North Texas shooters Association 12 Oaks Garden Club 14 Optimist Club - Evening x~ s u +genda~~o ~_L~ C'.~1 C Agendaliem c~ 4_1 Optimist Club - Noon 14 0016 Order of the Eastern star 15 '(21, Orea E. Davis Rebecca Lodge 4241 15 Overeaters Anonymous 7 P.E.O. is Plant: & Pray Garden Club 4 Preceptor Gamma Pi (Beta Sigma Phi) 15 Presbyterian Women 3 Progressive Club 7 Professional In-Home Child Care 10 Professional Secretaries International 10 Pythian sisters, Temple 418 13 Refrigeration Service Engineers 10 Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) 7 Rotary Club - Noon 13 Rotary Club - South 13 Salvation Army 7 Services Program for Aging Needs (SPAN) 7 Smokers' Rights 7 Sigma Alpha Iota 1 Soroptimist Club (The) 14 Stanfield Masonic Lodge 4217 14 Texas Assoc. of Parents & Educators of the Deaf 4 Texas Exes UT at Austin - Denton Chapter 1 Texas Extension Homemakers 15 Texas Licensed Child Care Association 4 Texas Society of Professional Engineers 10 Texas Tech Ex-Students 1 Theta Kappa Chapter of Beta Sigma Phi 15 Theta Phi Che ter of the Texas State Council 13 Top Tin Auto ~lub 12 Triangle Lions Club 14 Triangle Squares 12 Twilight Garden Club 4 TWU Alumnae Association i TWU Community Dance Center 2 TWU Dance Repertory Theatre 2 TWU Faculty Wives 1 United Commercial Travelers 10 United Ostomy Association 8 United Way of Denton Count yy 7 University of North Texas Alumni Association 1 Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 2205 14 Veterans of Foreign Wars Ladies Auxiliary 14 Weight Watchers 7 West Texas Legal Services 10 Women, Infants I Children Program (WIC) 7 Women of the University of North Texas 16 Women's AgloW Fellowshi 3 Women's Council of Realtors 10 Xi Nu of Beta Sigma Phi 16 YMCA of Denton 12 CITY COUNCIL 0! 0~ ht ~ O C f a o •MrON t~**~ 9 Yh HA, Maa CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 18, 1993 The Council convened into the work Session at 5:15 p.m, in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith; Council Members Brock, Chew, Cott, Perry, and Miller. ABSENT: None 1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss the following: A. Legal Matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Considered action in Lowery v City of ^enton, 2. Considered action in Gamble v, City of Den B. Real Estate Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 2. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding a study of the city's Animal Control ordinances and gave staff direction. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that at the request of the Council several options had been outlined in review of the City's Animal Control ordinances. Ms. Tuck first updated the Council on the Texas Department of Health and the Hartfelt facility. Earlier that day, Animal Control officers wore notified by the Denton Humane Society that animals that had not been seen before were out in the run at the Hartfelt facility. The Animal Control officers noted on their log the animals which were in the run and attempted to report such to the Texas Department of Health. The TDH had been tied up with calls concerning the plague, and Animal Control was unable to reach Dr. Murnane. Staff continued to ask for a written response from TDH to the Mayor's original letter concerning their position and whether they were doing anything or to the information that the Humane Society provided which was also forwarded to the TDH. Ms. Tuck stated that four options were outlined in the backup. The first option outlined an inspection ordinance as part of the permitting process for commercial animal holding facilities which were those that were open to the public. Standards needed to be adopted on which to base the inspections. The ordinance would not address facilities like Hartfelt which considered their facility private, nonprofit and were not necessarily open to the general public or private residences. 4 a } AaondaNa Cl9 - Agend~ilem City of Denton City Council Minutes Dets_ May 18, 1993 Page 2 Council Member Brock questioned why Hartfelt was considered a private, non profit organization. Me. Tuck stated that they were not a business like a pet store or a holding facility like a kennel that opened to the public. Hartfelt denied the City's Animal Control officers access to their facility saying they were a private agency and not open to the public. One must call and make an appointment to look at animals at the Hartfelt facility. Most ordinances from other cities outlined the definition of a commercial facility and did not include a humane organization. Council Member Brock questioned whether anyone could call themselves a humane society and were not required to meet any particular standards or be chartered with the state. Ms. Tuck stated that as far as she knew, the facilities were not required to meet any standards or be chartered by the state. Option IV outlined a bill before the State Legislature which made revisions to the current Animal Shelter Act. Currently, no permitting for tle shelters was in place, and TDH did not even have a list of what shelters were operating. Ms. Tuck stated she was not sure what Denton County required for non profit status as opposed to a commercial organization. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that in order to qualify for tax exempt status, any humane society needed to go through rigorous submissions to the IRS. Ms. Drayovitch stated she believ•jd that in the definition of kennel or commercial operation that Lhe exemption was for those that were charitable, non profit organizations that had that kind of funding. Council Member Brock questioned whether a facility could be a private, non profit facility and still not have tax exempt status. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that in legal torms that was possible. Council Member Miller asked that in drafting the ordinance for Option I, it cover the kinds of operations or activities where animals were adopted and not be based on the legal status. Whether a facility was profit or non profit was not as important. The ordinance should be concerned about the safety and health both of the citizenry and animals. Ms. Tuck stated that Noni Kull, the Animal Control staff, and a representative from the Legal staff explored the possibility of drafting the ordinance based on operations and activities and tried to define a holding facility for animals whether the facility was W k v fiends No c _ >y'Z! tigcndalte City of Denton City Council Minutes 'We May 18, 1993 Page 3 r(j commercial or nonprofit. One problem was how to differentiate between citizens with a number of animals and the facility that adopts animals out for profit. Staff determined that the definition was easier to tie to the number of animals as outlined in Option Ii. The problem with a clear definition was finding one that addressed both Hartfelt and the Roselawn situation which was a private residence holding a number of animals. Council Member Cot: asked if the staff had contacted A & M to see if they had an exparience like Denton's. Noni Kull, Environmental Health Services Manager, stated that her training and certification was from Texas A & M, and she had all of their documentation on the legal aspects of animal control. Texas A & M usually referred animal control facilities to their local health control agency. Ms. Tuck stated that staff consulted a number of cities and acquired copies of ordinances from them. If one of the options presented or any other option was the Council's wish, staff planned to proceed full force. Staff was requesting the general direction from the City Council and would work out details and wording. Council Member Cott stated that one page of the back up material had revenues for various years, and he assumed the options were tied to the revenues. Since no costs were reported, Council Member Cott was not sure how to read the report. One of the options was going to produce revenue and generated a cost. Council did not have the cost currently generated by what city did now. Ms. Kull stated that the Animal Control operating budget was approximately $66,000 without personal services where the majority of costs were. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the page referred to concerning revenues was not directly tied to any of the four options but was included to give Council a feel for the staffing level and workload requirements for the current Animal Control operation. As Council reviewed the four options, Option III gave staff the tools needed to get at the Hartfelts and Roselawns. Staff thought that a more limited approach may get the city where it wanted to go without having a major impact on the Animal Control operation. The real concern was that if Council settled on Option I was that the option had a major impact on city operations, and Council had to make some budget accommodations. Council Member Cott stated that the back up mentioned that Denton County incurred :39,150 in expenses, and he questioned if the County was current on their bill. I~ ~~77 7 1f 40Af>daNO0 C) Apeadait City of Denton City Council Minutes Dated May 18, 1993 C 7 Page 4 Ms. Kull stated that there had been some problems in the past and payments were slow but now they were worked out. Council Member Brock asked if the annual revenues on the chart through April 30 of this year were revenues from fines or where did they come fr )m. Ms. Kull staled that the revenues were not fines, but fees for animals that Iere redeemed from the shelter that had been impounded or for registration of animals. The revenue figure did not include fines. Council Member Brock asked what sort of accounting was done for the fines and where did the revenue go. Ms. Kull stated that fines were part of the Municipal Court operation revenue and staff would be happy to secure that information, Council Member Perry questioned that if the Council tried to do some enforcement revisions now with the State bill in the legislature was the city liable to run into some problems and perhaps Council should wait to see the results of the State bill. Ms. Tuck stated that the current bill in the legislature required a suspension of the rules to come out of the Senate. The bill needed to come out of the Senate by last Thursday in order for it to be considered in the appropriate way. The bill was not dead yet, but it appeared as if it were not going to make it. Staff continued to monitor the legislature, The Animal Sheltering Act improved the States reaction to the kinds of situations encountered in Denton. The Mayor asked if council felt as if they should wait and see if there were any action by the Legislature to enable the Council to make a more educated decision. Mayor Pro Tem Smith agreed with the Mayor and felt the Council needel to fill. the holes the Legislature left because she was appalled that there was no licensing or control of places like Hartfelt. Council Member Miller requested a week to week update on the status of the bill and then putting the Animal Control Ordinance options back on the agenda as soon as the city knew what the provisions of the State law were and what options the city needed to do to coordinate with the State bill to bring the Denton code up to date, The consensus of the Council was to continue to monitor the rtate i -VeMa No Agendaltem We City of Denton City Council Minutes .`7 May 18, 1993 vv Page 5 legislation and to bring the Animal control ordinance options back to Council after the decision had or had not been made by the Legislature. In the interim, the Mayor would assist staff in obtaining a written reply to the city's letter and subsequent information supplied to the State veterinarian and TDH. 3. The Council received an update and held a discussion regarding the request from the Town of Copper Canyon to annex a portion of Denton's ETJ and gave staff direction. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that at the end of April representatives from the town of Copper Canyon requested that the City of Denton release a portion of their extraterritorial jurisdiction to Copper Canyon for annexation. At the same meeting, the City of Denton allowed Highland Village to annex within Denton's ETJ which provided a corridor for 2499. Because of the location of Hickory Creek and the area requested, the City of Denton had a difficult time servicing the area with utilities, police and fire. A resolution of support for the 2499 project from the City of Copper Canyon had been provided as Council requested. Council Member Chew questioned whether the letter of support for 2499 was in hand and part of the official record. Mr. avehla stated that the City of Denton was provided with a copy of the resolution of support for 2499, and it was a part of the record. The Mayor questioned if there was a possible problem with Copper Canyon not being agreeable to the City of Denton city limits line across the northern portion of the area in question. Mr. Svehla explained that Council was being requested to relinquish ETJ authority in one area and that Copper Canyon could not legally annex within the city limits. Council Member Brock questioned whether even with the resolution of support could there be a way Copper Canyon might sabotage the 2499 project. Council Member Cott, who was an original member of the 2499 Project Board, stated that the project got sidetracked because of negative people from the City of Copper Canyon. The resolution of support was based on the assumption that there was no change In alignment of 2499 in the future. The City of Copper Canyon was allowed to be a member of the 2499 project but contributed no funds to support the project, Mrs Cott stated that unless the city wore certain there was no change in alignment the city needed to refuse the Agenda No CJ Apendafte r City of Denton city council minutes Date Y May le, 1993 Page 6 Lj 1 request. Mr. Svehla stated that Copper Canyon had been on record for a long time stating that they did not want the 2499 project In their city. Because of the finalization of the annexation by Highland Village and because the alignment had always been more to the east of Copper Canyon, a gap was established for the 2499 project, Predetermination of the alignment was a federal funds would not allow it because bofm he aenvironmental process and other processes required before alignment was determined. Because of the many possible alignments which had been discussed and which could either be in Denton's or Corinth's ETJ, Mr. Svehla felt that Copper Canyon could not sabotage the project. Mr. Harrell stated that from the staff's standpoint that it was advantageous to have everyone in the corral when visiting TXDOT to argue for funding, By getting Copper Canyon on record in favor of the 2499 project, Denton neutralized Copper Canyon's opposition to the project and helped the long range strategy for the project. Council Member Cott stated his concern was that previous statements to TXDOT by Copper Canyon were not forgotten. Mr. Svehla stated that some people around the area In question had requested annexation. Copper Canyon was a general law city which annexa Ithando Dentontcould say they had been hto the table y many resolution ito assist them. Council Member Miller stated that a lot of emphasis had been put on the 2499 project at the Region Transportation Council. The project had gotten good hearings from both RTC and the TXDOT so the 2499 project had been put on the highway system. Funding was available for the studies. Council Member Brock stated that she admired the City Manager's skill In extracting the agreement from Copper Canyon, Council Member Cott asked if Lake Sharon folks still objected to the 2499 project. Mr. Svehla said that Lake Sharon was not overjoyed and every effort was made to use trees and natural barriers to stay away from the retreat area. The consensus of the Council was to move ahead with Copper Canyon's request. 4. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding 4 c/ AgendaNO. Agend Its City of Denton City Council Minutes Oats - May 18, 1993 .7~ Page 7 construction of a road from Bonnie Brae Street to a new parking lot for the North Lakes Sports Complex and gave staff direction, Rich Dlugas, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that the request was for the city to accept a two and one half acre tract of property located north of Windsor and east of Bonnie Brae from Newton Rayzor. Acceptance of the property allowed the city to build an access road from Bonnie Brae into the new sports complex at North Lakes Park. Mr. Dlugas stated that the North Lakes Homeowners Association and residents of the North Lakes area expressed concern over the initial development of the complex and the future 300 car parking lot in which cars exiting the lot ran through the existing 125 car parking lot and emptied out onto Windsor Drive. Past problems with cars exiting the existing lot and homing down Parkside and through the neighborhood creating a dangerous situation increased with the new lot. The new road created a safer environment. Mr, Dlugas proposed constructing the road with project savings. The road cost was approximately $80,000 and the funds came from three sourcee) the road which connected the new lot with the existing lot would not be built for a savings of approximately $28,000 savings from lighting of fields while keeping at recreational lighting levels as at all other complexes would save approximately $63,0001 and approximately $12,000 interest earnings from the 1986 CIP transportation and engineering projects. The Park Board and the North Lake Homeowner Association gave their approval and the interest money from the 86 CIP bond issue had been approved by the 091 Committee. Mr. Harrell stated that the project was one Mr. Dlugas took on which most thought was difficult to accomplish. Mr. Dlugas had done a great job cutting other elements of the program to get the required amount of money needed to build the road. Council Member Chew asked if Mr. Dlugas thought that the road project really took the traffic off of Parkside. Mr. Dlugae stated that signage was needed to direct people to use Bonnie Brae to access the soccer complex, The only entrance to the new parking lot was from Bonnie Brae. Mayor Pro Tom Smith applauded the entire plan and expressed concern about any place that had only one route in and out. Smith recommended that the Council accept the dedication of the land for the now road. The Mayor asked if the now road was n drive or was it a dedicated ~r G VWJs No /.den tt+ City of Denton City Council Minutes Otite c~ May 18, 1993 Page 8 street with a name. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the land was dedicated as a roadway. The Mayor recommended that when the time came to put a name on the street the city consider naming it for Rayzor. Council Member Brock stated that some mistakes were made in the past when the park was divided by an east/west thoroughfare and she felt better that the 300 cars were directed to Bonnie Brae. Council Member Chew stated that it was important to make sure signage was correct so that folks used the new lot. Mr. Svehla stated that in the beginning calling the new road Soccer Field Drive and renaming the road as Rayzor developed the area. The consensus of the Council was to accept the donation of land and to build the new road from Bonnie Brae Street to a new parking lot for the North Lakes Sports Complex. The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith; Council Members Brock, Chew, Cott, Perry, and Miller. ABSENT: None 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the Special Call Session of April 13, 1993, and the Regular Session of April 27, 1993. Perry motioned, Smith seconded to approve the minutes as presented. On roll vote, Brock "aye's, Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith '$aye", Chew llaye'l, Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 3. The Council considered a request from Josten's for special permission to perform construction work from 5/5/93 - 5/21/93 Monday through Saturday from 7:00 p.m. - 5:00 a.m. K r. k WOW igendaltem ~7- R late City of Denton City Council Minutes cy / J Gf May 18, 1993 CC Page 9 Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development, stated that Josten's was requesting special permission to perform construction work from May 5, 1993 through May 21, 1993, Monday through Saturday from 7:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m as provided for in Section 20-1 of the Code. Staff gathered neighbors and representatives from Josten's together to visit about the issue. Concern from the neighbors was not so much about noise, but the neighbors wanting to know what was going on. Council Member Cott stated that Mr.Robbins was correct. He believed that what happened was a matter of communication. People who do work after hours needed to consider the neighborhood. Mr. Zack Adcock, 3400 Joyce Lane, from Josten's stated that Josten's should have spoken to the neighbors. Because of all the expansion work done the year before with no complaints, Josten's for Josten's of then employees. vassumed everything ot was concern right. Workers were trying to work during daytime hours to comply with the had put eon but asphalt and the ceiling for gravel but caused aspotential Plastic been ordinance hazard. Smith motioned, Chew seconded approval for special permission to perform construction work. on roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 4. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance with regard to the annexation of 3.85 acres located east of 1-35 and south of MI)aro Road. A-61 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that the annexation process was initiated back in January by Loves. Council first saw the item in February when staff was directed to follow the approved schedule. This was the second reading of the ordinance with no change in the area to be annexed since Initiation of the proceeding. The city had two public hearings, and there had never been any opposition. The ordinance annexed the property, adopted a service plan for how the city provided services to the property, and zoned the property agricultural. The following item the agenda Stp zoned was t currently property to being a Commercial Zoning the area where Loves Tr District. The Mayor opened the public hearing. r n Y aenda~a~ iaendaltem we City of Denton City Council Minutes May 18, 1993 Page 10 No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Council Member Brock stated that on page two in the plan for providing services was discussion of water and sewer main extensions, lift stations, etc. Installed by the developer. The plan stated that the developer was entitled to reimbursement of the costs for such facilities from pro rated charges. Ms. Brock asked if the city had not had a court decision or a new state requirement in the last year that made using pro rated charges a problem. Mr. Robbins stated that the service plan outlined was the standard used in all service plans. The city's subdivision land development regulations had a provision for pro rata charges that were repaid to a developer in the situation where the initial developer oversized the line and another developer hooked on. The second developer paid a pro rata charge to the first developer. The following ordinance was considered; NO. 93-079 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ANNEXING 3.85 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED EAST OF AND ABUTTING THE I-35 SERVICE ROAD, SOUTH OF MILAM ROAD; APPROVING A SERVICE PLAN FOR THE ANNEXED PROPERTY; APPROVING AGRICULTURE (A) DISTRICT ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF ;2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance rezoning 5.1312 acres from an Agriculture Zoning District and Commercial conditioned to a Commercial Zoning District, with certain conditions. The tract was located on the southeast corner of Milam Road (FM 3163) and Interstate 35. 293- 006 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that the ordinance rezoned the area annexed In the previous ordinance. Essentially, the ordinance had the same conditions and same zoning district as were applied in the area in the ordinance passed i +genda No " ' •zf igendaffero = City of Denton City Council minutes 181t May 18, 1993 Page 11 February 16, 1993. The only substantial district and the standards or conditi conditions between ithe ecuzonin rrent request and the one passed on February 16th was in number two which stated the pervious surface of not less than 808 of the lot. The previous ordinance stated it was 718. Planning and Zoning recommended approval. One notice was returned in approval of the rezoning from the landowner. The Mayor opened the Fublic hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Council Member Brock stated that from the back up materials there was not a problem with intensity. Ms. Brock stated that the land use regulations in the city's development plan allowed for more intense centers in a low intensity area. Ms. Brock asked how much more development was possible at the intersection or in the area. Mr. Robbins stated that what was at the intersection now was what the zoning district allowed. On February 16, it was zoned for existing use and no substantial change to intensity allocation. The restaurant had been expanded and renovation of the entire facility had occurred. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-080 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE OF 3.8543 ACRES OF LAND FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) TO COMMERCIAL (C-c) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION WITH CONDITIONS AND CONSOLIDATING SUCH ACREAGE WITH 1.2777 ACRES OF LAND ZONED COMMERCIAL WITH CONDITION (C- c) PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE 93-022 TO FORM A 5.1312 TRACT OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILAM ROAD (FM 3163) AND INTERSTATE 35; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously, The following items were considered out of order. } q3- ApendeNo Agend [ta City of Denton City Council Minutes Dale ~J~ / May 18, 1993 1 ~^N b L~ Page 12 7. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign and submit to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development a Final Statement of Community Development objectives and Projected Use of Funds. (The Community Development Block Grant Committee recommended approval.) Barbara Ross, Community Development Administrator, stated that the resolution allowed the city to submit the final statement to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Mayor Pro Tem Smith stated that she questioned Ms. Damico at a previous Work Session on the AIDS Denton Corporation. Mayor Pro Tem Smith had been provided information on the management of the organization which called it into question. Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked if there were any way Council could delay action on that one section until the organization was investigated further. Ms. Ross stated that Council could delay the entire statement but not one portion. The city had a deadline of June 1 to get statement into HUD. Mayor Pro Tem Smith questioned the management and board of AIDS Denton, whether or not there was a charter and bylaws, and what sort of organization it was and was it run in a businesslike manner. Ms. Ross stated that AIDS Denton had to have 501(c)3 status in order for the city to contract out with them which meant they had to be incorporated and have a board of directors. The program funded h,, the city was specifically the nutrition program and that was the only activity funded. Council Member Miller stated that the recommendation given at a previous work session from the Human services committee and coordinated with CDBG was a preliminary report that had not been approved by Council. Ms. Ross stated that the Human Services report given previously included both CDBG recommendations which were in the final statement and the recommendations for general fund dollars. The CDBG final statement needed to be submitted before decisions were made on the budget. Council Member Miller stated that he did not think final approval had been given for the funds and approving the Final Statement gave approval. I f AOeR No Apea0al~ ^ Q¢ City of Denton City Council Minutes Dale J~ May 18, 1993 JG~ 't~ y Page 13 City Manager Harrell stated that two separate pots of money were coordinated by the Human Services Committee. The general fund portion was a substantial increase over the current budgeted amount. That segment of the request was to be addressed in major budge: issues with a dollar determination of how much general fund dollars Council wished to allocate. The Human Services Committee then reprioritized and brought their request back to Council for approval. Block Grant dollars were on different time schedule that required submission by June 1 and final action on the Human Services recommendations as related to the Block Grant funds. The Block Grant Committee had set aside $100,000 for social services and asked Human Services to recommend specifics for that money. Ms. Ross stated that the Human Service Committee was aware that the agencies funded with CDBG funds were likely to get approval of their funding ahead of time and some agencies recommended for general fund dollars may not be approved. City Manager Harrell stated that Council had not given any kind of approval for the recommendations from the Human Services Committee and if Council were inclined to change allocations prior to submittal, they could do so. Council Member Chew stated that since the funding for AIDS Denton was for $5,000 for the nutrition program that he hated to see the whole program delayed. Council Member Cott stated that the figures presented were income figures and asked what were the costs involved to administer the programs. Ms. Ross stated that the cost to administer all of the projects was projected to be $1750000. Council Member Cott asked if staff was sure that there were no overruns. Ms. Ross stated that the amount allocated was the amount. spent. As the city got to the end of the funds, money spent on the program ceased until another allocation was available. Council Member Brock requested that next year Council have a little more time to investigate the program requests. Ms. Ross stated that CDBG Committee agreed with new procedures for next year. Barbara Adkins, 1213 Locust, representing HOPE spoke in support of the effort of the Human Services and CDBG Committees and asked the e 1 ,CendaNo r~ 1osrdaita RS 2 City of Denton City Council Minutes ate 1 May 18, 1993 Page 14 CJ City Council to consider the pressure on the service agencies not only for new programs but also for the continuation of ongoing programs. The requirement to provide shared or matched funding support from the city or the community ensured other sources of grant funding availability. HOPE had a continued need for support to ensure five year grant monies continued to come to Denton. The following resolution was considered: No. R93-026 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT A FINAL STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS WITH APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATIONS, AS AUTHORIZED AND REQUIRED BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry move,l, Chew seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered the Community Development Block Grantv Committee as resolution Community Development Advisory Committee. (The Community Development Block Grant Committee recommended approval.) Barbara Ross, Community Development Administrator, stated that the resolution was for a name change based on the increased scope of responsibility for funding which required committee advice. The following resolution was consideredi No. R93-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS RENAMING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT COMMITTEE AS THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew moved, Brock seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered approval of a resolution temporarily closing Charlotte Street from Avenue H to a point 1 c P Venda No c - Ageadauen ~ = City of Denton City Council Minutes Gate may 18, 1993 Page 15 designated by the driveway at 2520 Charlotte Street on June 4, 1993. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant. stated that the request for a street closing was the third annual tequest from the Owsley Coalition for a family block party on Friday, ,iune 4, from 4-8 p.m. The request included an area of Charlotte Street from 2520 Charlotte Street to Avenue H. Police allowed people in and out of area. The following resolution was considered: NO. R93-028 A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING CHARLOTTE STREET BETWEEN 2520 CHARLOTTE STREET AND AVENUE H ON FRIDAY, JUNE 41 1993) AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Brock moved, Chew seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. E. The Council considered approval of a resolution temporarily closing North Lake Trail between Bowling Green and Auburn Streets on Sunday, June 130 1993. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that the request to close North lake Trail between Bowling Green and Auburn Streets on Sunday, June 13, 1993, from 1:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. was from the North Lake Trail Homeowners Association for an annual block party. The petition included in the back up had the signatures of homeowners along the area requested to be closed. The following resolution was considered: NO. R93-029 A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING NORTH LAKE TRAIL BETWEEN BOWLING GREEN STREET AND AUBURN STREET ON SUNDAY, JUNE 13, 1993; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry moved, Cott seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. F. The Council considered approval of a resolution by the s t t S. i ~geraaNo IL Agenaa Items . City of Denton City Council Minutes U91e _ 7~fi May 18, 1993 /GCS , Page 16 Council of the City of Denton, Texas relinquishing in favor of the Town of Copper Canyon approximately 350 acres of land within its Extraterritorial Jurisdiction so that the Town of Copper Canyon may institute annexation proceedings with respect to such area. Tom Rogers, 821 E. Woodglen Dr., Copper Canyon stated that at the public meeting in Copper Canyon the night before the Bishop family requested annexation into Copper Canyon. Mr. Rogers stated that Mr. Bishop had originally requested to bring two parcels of land into Copper Canyon. One was on the east side of Bishop Road which was in the area of ETJ released to Highland Village. The request for annexation for that piece of land had been dropped. Mr. Bishop requested Bishop Read and his property west of Bishop Road to be annexed by Copper Canyon. The City of Copper Canyon passed a resolution in support of 2499 as requested by Denton and had supplied a copy to the City Council. Doug Harp, Mayor of Copper Canyon, 940 Rolling Acres Dr., Copper Canyon, extended his appreciation to City of. Denton staff members for their assistance. Mr.. Harp requested City Council's favorable review of the resolutions to be considered. In good faith, Copper Canyon's Resolution 9;-4 was prepared and passed. The resolution addressed areas of common interest and understanding and recognized Copper Canyon's support of FM 2499 through the area recently released to Highland Village. The following resolution was consideredt NO. R93-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON RELINQUISHING APPROXIMATELY 350 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN ITS EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TO THE TOWN OF COPPER CANYON SO THAT COPPER CANYON MAY INSTITUTE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS WITH RESPECT TO SUCH AREA= AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew moved, Miller seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. The Council returned to the regular agenda order. 5. Consent Agenda Perry moved, Smith seconded to approve the Consent Agenda. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "dye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Agenda No 00 011 Agendalle City of Denton City Council Minutes OBie 3 May 18, 1993 / I Page 17 A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. Bid #1479 - Brush Chipper 2. Bid #1488 - Roll-Off Refuse Containers 3. Bid #1490 - Irrigation materials and Controls 4. Bid #1496 - Distribution Transformers 5. Bid #1500 - Insulated Power Cable 6. Bid #1483 - Mozingo Street 8" Water Line and 8" Sewer Line 7. Bid #1484 - McCormick Street Sanitary Sewer 8. P.O. #34357 - Triad On-Site Systems B. Tax Refunds 1. Jimmy Dale Brown - $653.12 6. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.1. - Bid #1479; 5.A.2. - Bid #1488; 5.A.3. - Bid #1490; 5.A.4. - Bid #1496; 5.A.5. - Bid #1500) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-081 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith moved, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry ',aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for public works or improvements. (5.A.6. - Bid #1483; 5.A.7. - Bid #1484) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-082 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS) PROVIDING L AQvdaNo , AQeodal(e~ City of Denton City Council Minutes Date May 18, 1993 Page 18 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith moyed~ Cott s a ded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "a e" "aye", Miller aye". Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with Triad OnSite Systems for professional services relating to asbestos consulting and project management at Denton Municipal Center (DMC). (5.A.8. - P.O. #34357) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-083 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH TRIAD ONSITE SYSTEMS, INC. ASBESTOS REMOVAL CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED TO THE RENOVATION OF THE DENTON MUNICIPAL COMPLEX; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew moved, M Cott seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "a e" ye", Miller aye , Smith "aye", Chew "aye", unaniPerry and Mayor Castleberry "aye Motion carried D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance repealing Resolution No. R92-028; authorizing the City Manager to sign and submit an amendment to the 1990 Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds submitted June 22, 1990 to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development with appropriate certifications. (The Community Development Block Grant Committee recommended approval.) Barbara Ross, Community Development Administrator, reported that the ordinance allowed the city to provide ;100,000, originally set aside for affordable housing, to the Southern Hotel or the Crawford Building elderly project. The Denton Housing Authority received $811,000 from the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs and $900,000 from the Federal Home Loan Bank to be used for rehabilitation and new construction. The additional funds were requested to assist the Denton Housing Authority to complete some of the common areas in the old hotel building. Council Member Cott stated that the backup stated additional financing was to be obtained fr)m Eank One and First State Bank and e k AgenaaNo C13' Cge ~ Agenda~tem ~ City of Denton City Council Minutes Date 7'~'~l3 May 18, 1993 Page 19 asked how many dollars were being considered. Ms. Ross stated that the projected cost from a single contractor was $2.6 million. Council Member Cott asked that in addition to the money all ready raised the city was going to borrow $800,000. Ms. Ross stated that the Denton Housing Authority planned to borrow $800,000 against the housing tax credits. Council Member Cott asked if city taxpayers were responsible for the additional monies borrowed. Ms. Ross stated that the Denton Housing Authority borrowed the funds and the funds were paid back by the sale of the tax credits. The Denton Housing Authority operated the facility as part of the operation of the total Housing Authority and expected to receive Section 8 assistance which provided housing assistance payments for the operation of the facility. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-084 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. R92-028; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1990 FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS SUBMITTED JUNE 22, 1990 TO THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WITH APPROPRIATE CER9IFICATIONS, AS AUTHORIZED AND REQUIRED BY THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew moved, Brock seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. E, The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending the 1992-93 budget of the City of Denton, Texas by appropriating the sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) from the unappropriated reserve account of the Keep Denton Beautiful Board to account number 631-024-0806-8964: and providing for publication hereof. Cecile Carson, Community Improvement Coordinator, stated that the Keep Denton Beautiful Board over the last number of years had various programs which provided landscaping to various locations i '~b~deNa q 'bede~mo(.' City of Denton City Council Minutes k~jf May 18, 1 993 ~ Page 20 throughout the community. During the last year one of the programs was to have landscape Adopt-a-Spots. When the budget was prepared for the reserve account under the city's Community Improvement division, staff had not anticipated the popularity of the program and had not budgeted dollars to help in a matching situation. The ordinance before Council and recommended by the Keep Denton Beautiful Board requested $10,000 be transferred from the reserve account which were dollars generated from drop off recycling programs, corporate donations, and membership fees to be used in the landscaping account to work as matching programs with labor and assistance to the groups. Approximately ;26,000 remained in the reserve account for funding programs in future years. Council Member Cott asked how long the $10,000 would last. Ms. Carson anticipated that the $10,000 covered six to seven projects of approximately $1200 each. Currently, three projects were to be funded in the next month to six months and three more projects before the end of the fiscal year. Provisions for the program were made in the next fiscal years budget. The following ordinance was considered: N0. 93-085 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1992-93 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF DENTON$ TEXAS BY APPROPRIATING THE SUM OF TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100000) FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE RESERVE FUND TO THE KEEP DENTON BEAUTIFUL BOARD TO ACCOUNT NUMBER 631-024- 0806-8964p AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION HEREOF; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. F. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance acceptiig the dedication from Rayzor Investments, Ltd. of a certain lot, tract, or parcel of land situated in the N. H. Meisenheimer Survey A-810 Denton County, Texas and containing 0.561 acres of land, for street and utility purposes. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-086 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION FROM RAYZOR INVESTMENTS, LTD. OF A CERTAIN LOT, TRACT, OR ,'ARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN 'geflda No 4oendalt City of Denton city council Minutes May 18, 1993 'y Page 21 THE N. H. MEISENHEIMER SURVEY A-810 DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS AND CONTAINING 0.561 ACRES OF LAND, FOR STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry moved, Brock seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving rate schedules and service regulations for Texas Utilities Electric Company, providing an effective date therefor, providing conditions under which such rate schedules and service regulations may be changed, modified, amended or withdrawn, finding and determining that the meeting at which this ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law. Robert Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that on January 22, 1993, TU Electric filed a petition to increase the rates 15.38 effective February, 26, 1993. On February 6, the City Council approved an ordinance s:1spending the proposal for 90 days which was about at an end. T1,9 City Council had three options regarding the proposal which included denying the proposed rates or approving the rates, which TU would appeal to the Public Utility Commission, or accepting what the PUC declared and determined as a fair and equitable rate to the 700 TU customers within the City of Denton. Since either option one and two was to be appealed and the city trusted the Public Utilities Commission judgement in reviewing the fair and equitable rates for TU, staff recommended the city accept what the PUC approved by adopting the proposed ordinance. Mr. Nelson also stated that James Loveday, local manager for TU Electric, was in the audience for any comments or questions. Council Member Cott questioned whether in 1985 when the City of Denton franchised TU Electric and received 3% gross receipts franchise fee, the people in the area served by TU were given a permanent choice of either service. Mr. Nelson stated that some areas were dual certified which meant the customers had a choice of either TU or Denton Municipal Utilities with some areas triple certified with Denton Electric Coop. Council Member Cott suggested that the customers be notified during the same month annually that they had a choice. Mr. Nelson responded that was not done at present, but the policy could be adopted by Council. Current TU customers with a concern for service could petition the Council to review the certification VIII I 4pnda No q Agendalts City of Denton City Council Minutes DatA _.i May 18, 1993 Page 22 and services. City Manager Harrell recommended the policy be deferred to PUB for discussion and guidance. Brock motioned and Smith seconded that the policy of no^:ifying dual and triple certified customers annually be referred to the Public Utilities Board for consideration. on roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-087 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING RATE SCHEDULES AND SERVICE REGULATIONS FOR TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE THEREFOR, PROVIDING CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH SUCH RATE SCHEDULES AND SERVICE REGULATIONS MAY BE CHANGED, MODIFIED, AMENDED OR WITHDRAWN; FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. I ' Perry motioned, Brock seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Cott "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 7. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign and submit to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development a Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. (The Community Development Block Grant Committee recommended approval.) This item was considered earlier in the meeting. B. The Council considered approval of a resolution renaming the Community Development Block Grant Committee as the Community Development Advisory Committee. (The Community Development Block Grant Committee recommended approval.) This item was considered earlier in the meeting. C. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement between the City of Denton and the Texas Air Control Board granting a license to the Texas Air Control Board for an air pollution monitoring 4~endaNo. 0ete !T% City of Denton City Council Minutes Q fig/ ~1f May 18, 1993 Page 23 station. (The Airport Advisory Board recommended approval.) Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that the license allowed the Texas Air Control Board to establish a permanent monitoring site at the Municipal Airport on the northeast side of runway. Howard Martin monitored activities of TACB. After conferring with Denton County officials and city staff, the recommendation was that the Airport was the best site. The Mayor questioned if there had all ready been some monitoring at the airport. Mr. Svehla stated that there had been a temporary monitoring site located on the southeast corner of the airport. The ordinance established a permanent site on the northeast site with a ten year agreement. Council Member Brock questioned whether Council really had a choice whether the city was monitored. Mr. Svehla stated that as TACB established a permanent monitoring site in the county and the airport was the most advantageous for Denton. The following resolution was considered: NO. R93-031 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE TEXAS AIR CONTROL BOARD GRANTING A LICENSE TO THE TEXAS AIR CONTROL BOARD FOR AN AIR POLLUTION MONITORING STATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Brock moved, Chew seconded to approve of the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered approval of a resolution temporarily closing Charlotte Street from Avenue H to a point designated by the driveway at 2520 Charlotte Street on June 4, 1993. This item was considered earlier in the meeting. E. The Council considered approval of a resolution temporarily closing North Lake Trail between Bowling Green and Auburn Streets on Sunday, June 13, 1993. WOW i0end Ike City of Denton city council minutes ht~ ay 18, 1993 71 MCLI Page 24 tj 6 This item was considered earlier in the meeting. F. The Council considered approval of a resolution by the Council of the City of Denton, Texas relinquishing in favor of the Town of Copper Canyon approximately 350 acres of land within its Extraterritorial Jurisdiction so that the Town of Copper Canyon may institute annexation proceedings with respect to such area. This item was considered earlier in the meeting. G. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor of the City of Denton to execute, on behalf of the City of Denton, an interlocal agreement with the County of Denton for the provision of services associated with the holding and disposing of dogs and cats for the County of Denton; authorizing City personnel to collect fees associated with all interlocal agreements for services provided by the City pursuant to said agreements. Honi Kull, Environmental Health Services Manager, stated that the ordinance was for the standard agreement the city had with Denton County and the City of Corinth with one change. Denton County requested the city consider nursing animals or those that deliver while in custody be treated as one animal which would not increase the city's expense, burden or care. Council Member Perry questioned whether the charges received were adequate to cover city assts. Ms. Kull replied that the charges were adequate. Council Member Cott questioned whether the city was obligated to take a total number of animals or any number given. Ms. Kull stated that the city had an agreement separate from the one to be considered that stated that the city handled at least 1500 animals annually if needed. Council Member Cott asked what happened if the county had another situation like Hartfelt with possibly more animals than the city had physical space to accommodate. Ms. Kull stated that the animals were legally the county's property. The county needed to decide if the city needed to try to make room, to dispose of animals, or to make other arrangements working closely with the Humane Society. Council Member Cott recommended that the city deal only with Its capacity and not Incur extra expenses under a situation where the Agenda No 3 ' Q Agenda Ite City of Denton city council Minutes Date - 3 May 18, 1993 Page 25 contract with the county exceeded the city's capacity. Ms. Kull stated that at the time the city had been able to stay under capacity on almost all occasions. Council Member Cott questioned if the city picked up animals all over Denton County. Ms. Kull stated that animals were delivered to the city and the county contracted only for the holding and disposition of the animals brought to the city facility either by a county animal control officer or a citizen. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that the motion needed to reflect that the item was an ordinance and not a resolution. The following ordinance was considered: No. 93-088 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO EXECUTE, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF DENTON, AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF DENTON FOR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOLDING AND DISPOSING OF DOGS AND CATS FOR THE COUNTY OF DENTONI AUTHORIZING CITY PERSONNEL TO COLLECT FEES ASSOCIATED WITH ALL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY PURSUANT TO SAID AGREEMENTS1 AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Cott moved, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 8. The Council considered an exemption to the noise ordinance on Saturday, June 19, until midnight for the Juneteenth celebration at Fred Moore Park. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that the request for exemption of the noise ordinance was made by Willie Hudspeth on behalf of the Juneteenth Celebration Committee for Saturday, June 19, 1493, until midnight. Activities were screduled to end at 1100 p.m, and organizers anticipated an hour was needed to clean up the area after conclusion of activities. Juneteenth was co- sponsored by the Parks and Recreation Department. Due to a misunderstanding, the request was for only for Saturday night, but Mr. Hudspeth also requested exemption for Friday night. The Friday request was to be presented to Council on June 1. C. WL A4ende ND Agendalt - City of Denton City Council Minutes Date _LKi~_ May 18, 1993 lq6 CW11 Page 26 Council Member Brock stated that those involved with the celebration were committed to being out of the park by midnight and felt it important to have the extension to midnight to get everything put away. Ms. Tuck stated that the committee had requested from the Parks Department an extension of the hours of the neighborhood park for that night to midnight and the request to Council was just for noise. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to grant an exemption to the noise ordinance on Saturday, June 190 until midnight for the Juneteenth celebration at Fred Moore Park. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 9. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Stick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, reported that the city had been working closely with the Texas Department of Transportation on the Dallas Drive improvement project which included landscaping and a new culvert. Approximately three months ago, staff talked with Council about a median from Teasley Lane back toward new culvert. Conversations with the State indicated the median was impossible because of substantial cost. The exception to the request was a small grass island near the intersection of Dallas Drive and Allegre Vista that the city tried to do in patterned concrete. Last Friday, TXDOT indicated that they were including the island in their project but needed $5,984 from the city for the patterned concrete by Friday. In discussions with the 191 Committee the night before, the Committee recommended money be spent from existing bonds. Staff planned to proceed with the small island unless Council had concerns. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the budget priority questionnaires passed out needed to be complete and returned by Friday. Mr. Harrell stated that the North Central Texas Council of Governments Annual Assembly and training session for Councilmembers and Mayors was June 4. Mr. Harrell stated that certain Council appointments needed to be made in June and were to be listed on the June 1 Council agenda. Mr. Harrell announced that the orientation for individuals interested in serving on city boards and commissions was to be held next Tuesday at the Visual Arts Center at 7 p.m. I 04eadaNo l~ jl!2 4aenda119 City18of, D1993 on City Council Minutes 9~ G C/ Page 27 O Mr. Harrell announced that there was a regular meeting on June 1, a work session on June 8, a regular meeting on June 15, no meeting on June 22, and a work session on June 29. 10. There was no official action taken on Executive Session items discussed during the Work Session Executive Session. 11. New Business There were no items of new business to be placed on future agendas. 12. There was no Executive Session held during the Regular Session. With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 805 p.m. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS BETTY WILLIAMS DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACCO0116 AgerdaNo Agendallem Nate ~ G~ ! CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 25, 1993 The Council convened into a Special Call Session at 6:30 p.m. in the Arts Studio at the Visual Arts Center. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith; Council Members Brock, Cott, and Perry. ABSENT: Council Members Chew and Miller 1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss: A. Legal Matters 1. Considered settlement of the matter of the application of Green Springs Water Supply Corporation for an amendment to CCN NO. 11480; Docket Nos. 9824-C and 9447-C of the Public Utilities Commission. B. Real Estate C. Personnel/Board Appointments council Member Chew arrived during the Executive Session. 2. Council received information for potential Board and Commission candidates. An informal briefing session was held for all citizens interested in serving on a city board or commission. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACCO011A Agenda No. C AgeadaIt Ne `7 " / t> CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Al 1June 1, 1993 The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith; Council Members Brock, Chew, Cott, Perry, and Miller. ABSENT: None 1. The Council convened into the Executive session to discuss the following items: A. Legal matters Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 1. Received legal advice on qualifications of board members. 2. Considered action in Hunter v. City of Denton. 3. Considered action in Michael Wilson claim. 4. Considered settlement of the matter of the application of Green Springs Water Supply Corporation for an amendment to CCN No. 11480 and Bolivar Water Supply Corporation for an amendment to CCN No. 11257; Docket Nos. 9824-C and 9447-C of the Public Utilities Commission. B. Real Estate Under Sea. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. C. Personnel/Board Appointments Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. 2. The Council received presentations by firms responding to the City"s RFP for collection of delinquent taxes and gave staff direction. Harlan Jefferson, Director of Treasury Operations, stated that State law permitted taxing jurisdictions to contract with attorneys for the purpose of collecting delinquent property taxes and allowed for the charge of up to 151 of the delinquent taxes, penalties and interest as compensation to the firms. In the past it had been the practice to send out Requests for Proposals every two years in order to make a determination as to which firm to contract with. Since this was the second year of the current contract, Requests for Proposals were sent out and three proposals were received. Those firms were present to make presentations to the Council. I i 4e*No.l agenCaite )ale r . City of Denton City Council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 2 Heard, Goggan, Blair and Williams indicated that their firm had worked with the City over the past seven years and had collected in theexcescurrents of (1)r lothe cal iinvol ement which dcomto stay with bined HGBW statewide collections expertise with local attorney involvement, (2) a Denton office established since 1986, and (3) the spending nd d $400,oo0 in Denton. Performance of the firm included $4,665,709 collected since 1986, 1027 lawsuits filed with 754 resolved, a aggressive bankruptcy and federal agency collections. The continuity with their firm included (1) no risk in revenue loss, (2) no disruption in the program and (3) oP.fective relationships maintained. HGBW presented current year tax collection figures since 1985 and the associated percentages. Those figures were included in a handout which was included in the agenda backup materials. Also presented was a turnover/collections comparison chart for the City and a comparison of the delinquent tax roll by property type. The firm was hired last year by the DISD and since then showed an 184 increase in collections from the previous firm. The excellent results of tho firm were a result of their collection program. Phone calls were combined with letters to individuals with delinquent taxes and they also contacted lien holders. The foundation of the program was the real threat of a law suit being filed. People had to believe that the firm would file a suit if the debt were not paid. One area which was becoming more significant for Denton and Dentonle tax rolls was the RTC and the FDIC. There was approximately $100,000 of property in Denton which these two agencies were involved with. The Federal government typically did not pay past property taxes. A second area was the time taken with bankruptcy cases whit The firmts community involvement in D ntonswas noted.or Therefwere no conflicts with the two firms being the City's delinquent tax attorneys as they did not represent banks, lien holders, collected, ther delinquent of delinquency . had As more money had been public awareness that delinquent taxes wgone ould d be collected. Important numbers were final tax dollars collected. The firm felt that it had done a good job for the City and wanted to continue. There would be no disruption in the program if the Council stayed with their firm. McCreary, Veselka, Bragg and Allen indicated that their firm had been in existence since 1960 and had offices state-wide. They also had an office in Denton and worked with the local firm of Hayes, Coffey and Berry. The firm worked for Denton County and had an extensive amount of experience in delinquent tax collection. Since 1960 the firm had placed service as the head of all firm procedures. Staff had indicated three weaknesses in their firm which they wished to address, one was that they were unfamiliar beneaNa. - ; Agenda it City of Denton City Council Minutes Da1e_LL June it 1993 . Page 3 With the City of Denton staff and its operations. This was very easily rtgedied as they had already been given a tape by the Tax Office whi,-s worked on their computer system. They had been able to review accounts and thus would be no problem in working with the City of Denton, A second weakness noted was that the firm had no programming staff and relied on outside consultants. The outside consultants had been retained in 1979 to set up the entire computer operation of the firm and had worked well for all those years. The third weakness noted was that their main office was in Austin although it was noted that the firm had had an office in Denton since 1985. A review of their delinquency tax results for the County of Denton for the years 1989, 19900 1991 and 1992 was presented. It was noted that the outstanding debt had gone down in all of those years and a comparison of original levy vs, collection of levy to date was shown. The procedures used for collection included selecting accounts for suits, sending letters detailing amount due, and filing suits. The City had proposals from three good firms. Character and quality of the tax collection program was important. Hayes, Coffey and Berry had developed a governmental reputation over the years and provided good with the local firm, good support Perdue, Brandon, Fielder, Collins & Mott, stated that an important factor was how a firm collected the taxes. Their procedure would be to keep a parallel copy of the City's tax record on their computer and update it on a weekly basis. Mass mailings to delinquent tax payers would be done four times per year and with a parallel copy of the delinquent tax roll on their computer would be able to respond to the resulting increase from the taxpayers, All correspondence would be sent to the City Tax office to keep that office informed. All title work would be maintained on the computer system. The taxpayer must be convinced that payment of taxes was the right thing to do rather than fight the City for due taxes. Their firm had a proven and sound methodology for the collection of taxes and would provide full and total ad valorem tax representation. If hired, the City would get solid performance and hard work with consistent collection of taxes. They did not have an office in Denton but if awarded the contract, would open one which would be full staffed and supported by the Arlington office. Jefferson indicated that this item would be on the Council's following work session for further discussion. Council Member Cott asked about the concept of automatic renewal versus reviewing the contracts on a regular basis. He favored a regular review. i I ,f ~ ~3 ,:,3 ,i I ' ~i k W ~ DIOCCATION STATE Of TEXAS M i t idt OOUMTT OP DENTOM n I ! ft, 0 OANp VNIRIAS, OINTON IPIPINDINT SCHOOL DISTRICT, VILLA 1105?ITK aqd OOR4INA NUDSPg1Y1 era the o' sltested. In the 3o stuck Sumy Ilbstra4t Number $5 and the 0, Cisco Survey Abettava Number S iT Illtil and being all of Sat e, !lock A Hlntlc Addittos es shown by the Rapist Osten( Tscorded in T of Denton County, Torus and all of the called 3 136 save treat described la the deed to Vl 3171 the subject tract br, rig more particularly doscrlbed as followst N t A gl 8601N0INO fog the most Vesteriy Northwest corner of the tract bothi descrtbod heislo, a l/ of the said Lot I to the North right-of-way of Newton Sttolt and the South Line of a tract t recorded in Yoluee 9790 tags 116 of the Down County Posed Recordrl K n„ 1 v %X , THENCt South 11 Degrees $5 Minutes 03 Woods tut with the North line of toot 6 and the Sout of 257000 cost to a 112 lath iron rod found at the Squthweat carrier of the sold Hudspeth • THENCE; North 00 Degrees 18 Minutes pS S cdodi Clot with the Vest line of the Isid Hadspetl r 50, 0 50'` 100, 112 loch Iran rod found It the Northwest carrier thereof! ►v < THENCII South 78 Degrees 17 Minutes 01 Seconds Usk with the North line of the Hudspeth tr+ LA inch trop rod found at the Northeast torgac thersafl _ r li - fwMN ~ TNINCg South 01 OlSrses 16 dlsuta 01 Seoopds Vest with tbI tier Use of the said Nodspeth Addlttoa sa recorded is Yolumis 421, Page 1 of the Denton Count Flat Real Proidrt ' WOrl NORTH FORTH WORTH BANK : 64 t rocaer at the Sorthea4t tamer Of the sold Nudepeth tract) z N. >F t►It~ TH"CC North 61 poitoaa 12 Nlpwtes 23 34eoads Wit vlth the North V. 1199/P, 203 tine of Wt 3 the set ` t South loll of the 84W Hudspeth tract r1 distaste of 953,!9 lest to `a l1S lmah Itoa Tod (ou - , _ 1 of the Lot 31 y ■ (RF • ~ ti rT ; ~r~ I " ~ THENCE contlnutag vltb the North Ilrieot the slid gat and the Us t tuSouth glue of 0 f~ f .Or o.. S At S lr • 1 South Oi Digress IS Minutes 26 Seconds Vest a distance of 30,00 fee 9e~2s X A.....~ ~:`'«r, I~ ~I t to a 1/2 Inch ~ so 3s e f a~'6a f ,North 6R Degrees, 31 Minutes 19 Seconds 11ejt S distance of 3$344 feet to a 112 inch IRf ~~~N~YY MAP of 1Nrto4 Streets I ~ ~r•~ X \ EO' SAN. SEWER NO °SCALE THENCE with' the sold, riSht-of-way and 6 curve to the left having a ndtue of 50 !s ESMT. 917/T90 et and as ve North SS 1ltgeesa 53 Niauta,I 16 Seconds Wet a distance Of 55,06 fast) to the PLACE Or Stoll 1 D AINAOE Clot SAN, SEWER ii J ~2 N JOHN C. GAY, e# ux ESMT ESMT. FILE010959 vas 9d~ E V, 714/P. 378 i2•IC 63 S~9f ` ° LOT 3 HOW, THSurroars "m ALL HEN 8T THESE Pk9S9NTSt J s1 LOT 4R /AADDKK11SS0N OON THAT, we DENTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, VILLIC HUDSPETH and D013THA HUDSPETH do her the hereindescribed property the LOT' 1 R of MM Ar MINTER ADDITION in the Cityof Dan \ I BLOCK A OF DENTON dodlcsta to the public use forever the street right's of way and pwblit IIIMIatI shown h b 0 a9 ACRES ,626/ P,B H. CISCO SURVEY, Q~ lkhton In epee ant Schoo Dtatrlct it le Hu spat ~i ` a A-1184 C.J. ~r~P SWEATMAN x 3l7 e' J. BROCK SURVEY, A--55 3246 P TONE A sp fir Ere i~ r V.979/ P.116 APROX, LOCATION 9r/y~ 0 I S E.C, CISCO SUR, cov"11 Of Dtwro" !a~t~ IRf g 111,00101' it gotoo b*1 T eltfonollT ep acbnooleeaia to set lhol of hfl i' the fo 014 t State tta ne of Inttt ?Texas ge an ti tAl064l do et onudltontlkhnoot1d Ibtnee*u1s rubU100it tt Ibo ed end to for I a s' IIrMtoI be HE the the 1Ntlon t6*relp a:yegPtfooi f sew, Ia;tA1 t1f eetty thustl elltlh Is 1, the rorpte al/ renAll F N~1~ 100.07 a Nh'~ 9~"~ lam I~r~ L+61,11 30' GENERAL UTiL. EASEMENT t~ LOT 2 a~ 1 ~.l ■ u F 16' UTII„ EASEMENT ROUrj u 1ile e t e tal4,011 exii BLOB nI , BLOCK A Nr Coerltllon txpltUr - P MINTER y TER ANN. ItA11 or 11,AA1 4WNf1 of Dow" CAB, I/F B~ I~P~ 2~ ItfdAE HE the ondott11n11 Not4ty tublte In aAd for the Stitt et tel4e on this day p41e40411y eppraetd,~ of to b4 the peo4oe uhort Alai 10 aobeetlhed to the 141e10141 114011tootntt and 4ebnoultd6el to of that b4, to we thri h~ x • R~0 ECE1 PLAT RE RECORDS, the putpooo 041 eootl11ratkoA thetaln esprollolt o4d to the oepeelty thtrol4 et4tedr 4gyp' I 019tM VNDU MY MANY AND IIAh Of 0111C9 tlll$ 0+11 01 JUL 011993 DENTON CaUI COUNTY, TEXAS ety u6f~"t Tn Z~ii 1~i e e ~fii4i n MN M g WROMENT M1 coallsilo4 uplrotl,,,~,,,,,,,...,_; DOMMIENT M DEVELOPER: WILLIE AND OOAEYHA HUDIPETH 316 N. DONNIE 6AAE DEMON MAS FINAL FINAL F REPLA7 of the MINTER ITBR ADDITION of BLOCK A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL LOS` 4R of 9L { 9eIng a Repldt of LoM, glook A of i-ok A of Minter Addltlon plus 3,339 Aoree of Unp' of Unplatted L.dnd 'OK OUR,# A-S tu~rstalt s tcsttnehft duy of 1993 tlt BROCK(~YI~1e OUR,, t}lie rrr.a.++.rrr+rYwW r .r+++~+w++..i.w.. ~ fl Appfoyed XON ALL His it lotst w1f.1111t o IRS IRON Rob sit ul CISCO V by~the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, + IRF IRON ROD POUND CITY a COUNTY of bE TIt6t to Vt441i1M Hi COUNAVo 10111t4t04 rletllltasll UAd 6Vlserltj do hltsAr tttitly that I 1 1tlrsnd thll dlst flog to setatl Aad AttalAto lath at the lint 411011144 hltloe, And (hat th1 tltatt oth"44to, Ohara h1N1e well hand at r~111d ""dot of rAltanal aarllalstll In SURVEY LINE (Mayor) WE: 22 APR. 1993 Itletdletl With (he 0141ASn46 Of 14 Ctlr 11 t4ftIftj UAAei DRAWN BY: MO COL (City Secretary) scALE:.►e a 100" 1 REVISED: 4 JUN, 1993 is OTC' Wri L : 3 4 APL L ! r-r al i 1 J r 1 ml !1! V SRS I! ~J i l~ _ M TEM LEY I AN I SURVEY ENE~TYPK tloltANT r. T.E. PEACOCK SURVEY C, POULLALIER SURVE A-1589 A--1'006 .......~,TO' OPA OE EASE i 60' 0 +50' 100' J DETAIL PLAN NOT S / ACREAGE: _ LOT I 1.248 ACRES I ~K Al DENTON CATHOLIC ADD'N. I i o'SANI Mgr LOT 2 5.179 ACRES LOT I, BLOCK As DE aew,Et NT. CAB. H CAB. H/P I00 P.R. ~ 6,427 ACRES ZONED A ZONED A (CHURCH USE) STORM oAAiN uI~Et TOTAL ACREAGE ~ I 8 e8' 8 98•6'S'4 ' 4839' Q' ' 0 GROSS FLOOR AREA (OFA) pit z - ONE FAMILY DWELLING DE' ACHED (LOT 1) 3000 sq Ft 1 MA Y►AS r~,nurn 11 r-IT p WOODS MAf$ - I S (1 TREES ON ACRES 4 BEES ALAN H 00 (6.4V? 729(A ia' urn. eaMrtr. - P. LOT 2 1 OR$ ACo WOODS 0 (21 TREI I I 0 4 waQ ■ Uw N N CL V10 U ~ Z I J D 0 N 'i 1 u > Q d I I I z f 'Y 1 u Y r I , 6'TREES 'i.• d~ 5 I I h ca i x yN 1 E y1' I L pNtf ~ COTf4C 1 7 ~ ~p~~pp6 ,VA~~ , 4 WOODS MASS ` ` ~'oME~E ~OGEN ,,a,o O~~ga oa, (4# TREES) 1 t J ~R Abp . lu ' *00 92~I~~~~ A4 q • ~~g1dE t ytti fit, sl Ak' I i 1 ` OWNERS; THF. Al 1 •''f ALAN a SHIRLEY GOLDFIELD 3101 CARMEL D9NTON, T9XAS DF.TAIL.PLAN LOTS I a 20 SLOCH A, GOLDFIELD AD C, POULLALIEA SY. A CITY ~ COUNTY OF DEN'S L.J w+ 11at~ u DAT MA 19 1995 t _ .r DRAWN 9Y4-COLE iaaar SCALE1 1" a 100' D NtO (NO OCALEI •93 LOLAVICINI Y A P, N0, 91• 0750 0 i i f r 1 i~ i 6=mmmi i `1 ■~.i.!'A1.4•._SMe-::M~l:y'YI~1~~8~°~i'~J~"'B.i .t ♦ .1: w ,1 y~ ` Y ' '♦t~~~~JJJ If ~,.,.~r, .AM'M~,~r,d 5~;. yH «YFM1 C ~ta -,~1 r }""f ~J1,' Y;ql FI 'r! ,,ir 1 f rr ~ •ar rr'. Irsn."a,' +4:fi!'1-" 't1`. ';M'ft~,~F 'I't ~r]t~tM1 4,~~,,, r 1~., t';f~11 'Y~ 1 ~ ,°~t' 1 5°,~/l., J' t °j~~5 +'rr f F. ~l1r 1" ~'r~t~lAi ~ti i' j y 1 1 { f C e1 1. 1 + .Y / i i ♦ 4, tf 1 !1 dT t A,": V R "i t"«~~'. ~ 4~..,A, ~t+4 1~(~ y, 5 ~ ±ri. "k ~S ryra + p-.F ,°r F r .,tJl*~, ,y„5+~1 r f• .1'rl fr f ~Yg~I l«r s~.,,,. r, a~r,! a 1 ~r ~f~►,~ ;~'•t~j' MI~~..F~,YrA~llhi~~~y,~ iTtyy~w}~' ~~hi~~je! ~ttp~"{ j~~l ~~{~~i"'i~7. ~~~~"~Y r i ~'~t~~ 1, , a r 1 p t" •1 1 K t e 4}~ ! t, rll , ..4~ry ~~F-11 iil~i I~ I{ ~ l~~ ~1•~ CC ' 41Y1 ii ~L' ~~BY J t 'r i1 i V 1 tl. Y f~ 1, l 41? , ! 11~ ..1 rt A S '4 r~ 1,.~;, R rv .I✓R1'. " 'I J 1~4' If e, y ~t r~.d~. Nt ~~1a 1,1 i 1 ~.a r~ + .t, Pon C A." rr .i ~ f 4 .'v rll t~'!~ ~ },~:I 4A~,`t r 5; ~ t,. 1 +l' ul! R',° •i ~.r I "a.. 'r p~ "f. QAYTOW , t p F ,'1 r' S ~ r , t rt f a A~ ~ a +1 7 i i-: i ) 11 ~t 1 ~l11C9t r i~ 1 br t ^ t y 0 r 1, ,w t " , 1. r, , n 'll f t r! , r y 'r+ i ~}.'}I I`t4Gi' I 6'j I 0 I h 2 R f ~ I ~5 1 1a n~11i,~i ! r 1 t 1Ty JTJTy 1n`m~~rw1+■ IN`' B „PU + 5 n a • 9 { law low 1Y 7r AND "'S 1 ~AW,RSi ..SSV Rol "VITY, 44, k r 4f 1PAU , r CSC Ts. n P CM0 f . S I S3 Cs+± NQ +w ~`~1 W7 ; Ml~; T 1e0 r. 993:''`'" IV OL9wS 7wft f r y, HBINNINa . A~`,'~4N xRON. FIN AT TEE 50U`tNB$T '0 OLI~INS' S'Tt ISM' AND ;TNT: t~ 3 r. ON THE NORTK LINE OF .C STREBT~ : SOUTH 8 IORZES` 33 MIN S` 40 . NCON ~vrT' °s NOI T { HXOHT b t WAY Or COLLINS STRSET A DISTANCI xNt. ' IRON VIC1f~rY `I4P , s to sEotrs iSNC NGRTI 00 DE(RE s ".0`0, N'v 20 1,55 , FED xb AN IRON, PIN IN THE Ntl IlIN' 41 r;T 'DEGREES ~4 MINUTES 00 "4EC4NVS- + HBIdCS -0 , I - ~ ANQ,W E NORT A$T a I6I~5''EN't'.ni. Affil oNN.~j co OfAs f+. THE WEST:' HIGHT 0 WX'L LOT2 LOT Y 5 a fiNF, Cs ` S4~TH ALONG THE 'WEST.:~IGET b~'' ~ F1A I.OT` 3 V~ ~Ol SAY MAY 2 $ 1993 i DY$TAt CZ 'OF 203 25,' P4 ST. O THE PbINT' OF S 4IN1 +s~ I~0;751~C"0'LANO!` f Vt"tRIC wee 44 oo E -4 • T.. NOW "THERstoRkANOW~ 49SE MEN EY THESE PRESENTS F - 0 CHI EIOUS~~ CORPONATIOt~ 0' NORI xHAx ws> sxir Q ` 01 ne ' AbOgT, Tf~ $ . RgPLAT-' V0iGNkTIt~piE HFRF,IN ~B~ IdN~ AN ADDITY rb- 0. , R,' BLbCj( 3WATTAN ADBI't W ~d3C , WT g L WON, COVNTY~ 'T'EXAS AND DO ifERE A DENTON' 11. LOT i' w pUBL'xC USE " 'ORSV THE STREW RIGHT~OF-WAY. w 3 • C 0~0 3 SHOWN HENE4N T V~ • r r r ii~4 V ~n'1,1 YTxM1Y iZ~s "'rh~q )!:ppo,4~.,f ! .r ;d, ~wvbmle5~ x ilk w"~ ~ze~r~rypd4C~dt;" Yy r,~gtAl M r.r.~r+Y ~ s a ~a~, N , 11 e {y r~ f't y c 'Sq t , r a :1;i~. tr v % " Aa ~Mif ~ r S' a ~J 7 ~1 SIP W N 0 ~ E s 1 CHI U~ ;'G .4 - 1 L`Q'~ 8 R PREM)ENT , w BY °A E!MYNTON °g ' 0.78 fore-' i , ,,lx OT 4, lick v COUNTX or DENTON ` ' , : THE 11NDERSI~IEO'AUxHORITY TN AND BEFORECIE t STATE ON 'THIS DhYsitsOW~4t~~t APPEARED Ja i ~e' ew►, i'o, Lf ~ 3 PRkslMENT OF SI4MA' CHY HOUSE CORPORATION OV ' 'N! ME TO 'BB ',THE, "PERSON 'ANn'.OF~FICER WHOSE NAME, Y r 'OREGO' NO INSTjtUMBNT► AND ACMOWL9009O TO M1 ~A ' E Aft OF THE w SIGMA, CHI HOUSE. CORPORA y. gee 4a w rei,Dol po ' ANO THAT HE Exz=SD THE SAME AS THE ACr Ur ~11C*1' Ur Ali! ~.tsr~V~im~ayy.~.~,. Ole i?,e(;~kNl if THE PURPOSE AND CbHSERATYbNS 'TFIRREIN EXl Gli\ EXPIkLSS90 AND IN THE !a APACITY TNSRSIN.STA11EDt OPACITY, OFFICE THIS _,r._....DAY OF STREET I~ GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL or OPPICE LOLL MS 60 KItlHT OP WAY ---~---w-== - (SEAL) bLOCk ~ ~x 9LOCK +O HIL491aS pnQl?"ION 7 NOT RY PU LIC, S L L J BLOCK b HILLSIDE ADDITION WA's TAM ADON, vOLs I, ro,13, p p, von., #so pd. dea,n,a PRINT .D NAM 0 w COMMISSION g) um t !a ~..Y~ SURVEYOR'S CSRTIr, ATS t y _ owM ~ ilAW *UtPC * Maya AV ivr9g PR99MTIS I it GRAPHIC UALt FlMf aWN NN J AV4 CKD dY OATS Rtvl$IONS !r t L 4 - t r f { 1 r - L S V 3 5 +Qend It Benda No *4~ City of Denton City Council Minutes Sib June 1, 1993 ~Page 4 Jefferson state4 that it had been the Cityfs practice to send out RFP's every two years. Under State law, collection of delinquent taxes was a professional service and the City could negotiate with any legal firm it desired and enter into a contract without going through the RFP process, Council Member Cott stated that he was suggesting an annual review rather than an automatic renewal. Council Member Miller asked if the firm of M-Creary, Veselka, Bragg and Allen would have a conflict of interest as they took cases against the city. Richard Hayes, Hayes, Coffey and Berry, stated that if the firm were awarded the contract they would not have any adverse work against the City. There wore nc, pending adverse matters and the firm would not take any. Council Member Cott asked if Peterbilt vas an unusual situation and were the numbers distorted based on that. City Manager Harrell replied that this was an unusual case and did not happen often. Council Member Cott asked if the 154 were mandated. Jefferson stated that that was the maximum allowed by State law. Council Member Cott asked if a lower service level could be requested such as 124. froCity allaof t Harrell stated firms which wasathe5proposal a ads to the been City as ea result of the request for proposal, Council Member Cott stated that it was not a mandated service level. Jefferson replied that it was the maximum that could be charged. The 154 was what was charged to the delinquent taxpayer which was collected from the taxpayer and then reimbursed to the tax collection agency. Council Member Brock questioned the weakness listed for Heard, Coggan Blair and Williams which indicated some type of adverse publicity. s Agenda No, A9end 1te Dole City of Denton City Council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 5 Jefferson replied that several years ago the firm was involved in some negative publicity regarding former speaker of the House Gib Lewis. He had been a lien holder in a property suit. Lewis contested that he had not received proper notice. There was a follow-up investigation and the firm was not charged with any violations. 3. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding the appointment of Council Members to various Council committees and gave staff direction. Due to a time constraint, this item was considered under Miscellaneous Matters from the City Manager in the Regular Session. 4. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding a study of the City's Animal Control ordinances and gave staff direction. Due to a time constraint, this item was considered under Miscellaneous Matters from the City Manager in the Regular Session. 5. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding recommendations of the 191 Committee and gave staff direction. Due to a time constraint, this item was considered under Miscellaneous Matters from the City Manager in the Regular Session. The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 700 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENTI Mayor Castlebarryl Mayor Pro Tem Smith) Council Members Brock, Chew and, Perry. ABSENTt Council, Members Cott and Miller 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. Council Member Cott joined the meeting. 2. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the Regular Session of May 4, 1993. Council Member Miller joined the meeting. ♦ E eel Agend Ile Date - City of Denton City Council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 6 Perry motioned, Smith seconded to approve the minutes as presented. on roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Cott, "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 3. Citizen Reports A. The council received a citizen report from Dena Fairfield regarding the tree preservation and landscape ordinances. Ms. Fairfield stated that on April 27, 1993 construction workers cut down a very large oak tree which possibly was the largest tree in Denton. The tree was estimated to be approximately 135-150 years old. The tree was situated on the lot such that she felt the building could have been designed around it. She understood that at a prior work session a representative of the developer indicated that the specifications of the State mandated that the tree be removed. She had contacted a representative from the State and he indicated to her that had they been aware of the existence of this particular tree, they would have worked around the tree. She recently had been in several State -%%!:ldinga in Austin and noted that there were tress located in thm middle of some of the buildings. Her objective was to ask Council to reexamine the tree preservation ordinance particularly when dealing with very old trees. She sug,ested for,aing an ad hoc committee to reexamine the tree ordinance and formulate special provisions for old trees. B. The Council received a citizen report from Dess:e Goodson as a follow-up to a previous citizen report. Ms. Goodson stated that only one Council Me.aber had responded to her requests which she had presented to Council at a recent meeting. She had received a letter from Catherine Tuck informing her that Code Enforcement would monitor code violations at the Delta Lodge and at Oak and Hickory. But the problem she had noted was at Oak and Fry. She called attention to several blind spote at intersections and sidewalks with overgrown tree limbs. She had contacted Code Enforcement regarding the situation and they indicated to her that they could not do anything about it and had not received a follow-up from officers. During her previous citizen report, she had indicated that Traffic Control had misplaced trolley signs almng several routes. She had since learned that it was a lack of communication with the SPAN office not within Traffic Control's department. The signs had been installed per SPAN instructions. Sine indicated City Manager Harrell Chief Mike Jez, Catherine Tuok, and Manny Coronado had taken time to help resolve community concerns. She also expressed a special thanks to Jerry Cott, one and only Council Member who S f 1 a~ spends Yo. ~ ~ Agentl ft9m # Oate City of Denton city council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 7 cared to resolve her concerns and expressed disappointment with the other Council Members. C. The Council received a citizen report from Don Smith regarding the tree preservation ordinance, Mr. Smith stated that when the tree on McKinney was cut down, he went out and examined the size of the tree. He thought the City had a tree ordinance which protected a tree of that size. A core of the tree indicated 84 rings and he calculated the age of the tree to be approximately 125 years old. It grew poorly in some years and flourished in others, He urged the Council to reexamine the tree ordinance as he felt it had a flaw if it allowed the removal of such a tree. He suggested adding a provision for special prominent trees such as the oak tree which was cut down. This particular tree was very healthy and was doing well. He proposed a standard beyond which it took special permission to take down a tree with a 20-24 inch diameter and suggested setting up a committee to look into the issue. 4. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance amending Section 18-100 of the Code of Ordinances relating to applications for loading zones) providing for parking of certain authorized vehicles within loading zones] amending Section 18-101 providing for the marking of loading zones] amending Section 18-102 providing for a violation for unauthorized parking in a designated loading zoned creating Section 18-102.1 providing for a penalty in the minimum amount of $25.00 and the maximum amount of $200.00 for violations thereof] providing criteria, dimensions and application fee for loading zones. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manger, stated that this process was almost two years old. The Main Street Program had worked with the parking issues on the Square and had done a parking survey. Part of the survey dealt with the loading zone issue. The Citizens Traffic Safety Support commission had discussed the issue and surveyed other cities regarding the type of zones in use. A majority of the cities surveyed had a different zone than Denton and used more of a general zone for loading and unloading. The proposed ordinance was reviewed at Council's last meeting and contained a compromise provision with general Bones and specific zones. Based on Council feedback from that meeting, the proposed ordinance was changed to include only paid for zones, no general zones and also included the changes for vehicle identification with some type of sign, and mirror togs for enforcement, After disckissions with the City Attorney, it was determined that if the Y Agenda No C{ Agenda Ito Date City of Denton city council Minutes 6@~ June 1, 1993 Page 8 Council wanted to have two types of zones, a different ordinance should be considered which would delineate the two types of zones and make sure the general zones were used correctly, The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tom Smith asked how the proposed ordinance difforad from the proposed ordinance from the prior meeting. Svehla replied that this ordinance did not have any general zones, it only had specific zones. Council !Member Miller stated that he still had a concern of not carrying out the intent of the Traffic Safety Commission and allow general zones to cut down the number of zones. He asked if there had been any further discussion with the Central Busins:is District after the prior Council meeting. Jane Riles, Main Street Coordinator, stated that from the beginning of the process, the feeling had been that status quo was fine and cost of the individuals who were holders of loading zones did not want to sae any changes. Recent discussions indicated that current loading zone holders were comfortable with the current ordinance. Council Member Cott felt that the community no longer needed parking spaces for a particular business and that all loading zones should be general with users actively loading or unloading. Council Member Parry stated that people who used the loading zones the most were satisfied with the status quo and felt that the Council should move in that direction. The following ordinance was considered NO. 93-089 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18-100 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON RELATING TO APPLICATIONS FOR LOADING ZONESt PROVIDING FOR PARKING OF CERTAIN AUTHORIZED VEHICLES WITHIN LOADING ZONES; AMENDING SECTION 18-101 PROVIDING FOR THE MARKING OF LOADING ZONES$ AMENDING SECTION 18-102 PROVIDING FOR A VIOLATION FOR UNAUTHORIZED PARKING IN A Cj AAerwa No. ` . . i a-, - ~1 Ageodalte . 4 Data City of Denton City Council Minutes ` G~ CI June 1, 1993 Page 9 DESIGNATED LOADING ZONE; CREATING SECTION 18-102.1 PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF $25.00 AND THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $200.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE REMOVAL OF VEHICLES IN VIOLATION THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR CRITERIA, DIMENSIONS AND APPLICATION FEE FOR LOADING ZONES; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR A SAVING CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance as presented. Council Member Miller expressed concerned about the process. The Council appointed various boards/commissions to study issues and to make recommendations. If the recommendations involved anything other than status quo, the Council was reluctant to go by the judgement and input of those boards/commissions. He felt that the general and specific zones would have been a good procedure. He asked council to think about the consequences of continuing to ask citizens to spend time on issues and then continue to not follow their recommendations. On roll Vote, Brock~l1nayls, Cott tonaypo, Miller °ayell, Smith "aye" Chew °ayell# Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye$', Motion carried with a 5-2 vote, B. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance increasing the boundaries of Planned Development No. 108 from 16354 acres to 1.489 acres by rezoning a .135 acre tract from the 2F district and amending the detailed plan by increasing the gross floor area on property located on the east side of Carroll, north of Highland and mouth of West Prairie. Z93- 007. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval.) t wasna minor amendment toetherplanned devel pment which Would thathis an additional 1460 square feet to complete the second floor of the buildings. The existing parking lot on the east was allowed under the zoning ordinance, The Planning and Zoning Commission found the proposal was in accordance with the Denton Development Plan, The Mayor opened the public hearing, Dale Irwin, owner of the property, stated this was an example of a zoning situation when a previous procedure allowed for definition of building lines, There would be no change in what was currently built and would complete the second floor of the buildings, No one spoke in opposition. 4pendaNo. ~gen~a~~ert~. I )s xta 7 G c'..L',,.. City of Denton City Council Minutes sge; J, June 1, 1993 Page 10 The Mayor closed the public hearing. Council Member Perry asked if there were no change in the building, why was it on the agenda. Robbins replied that there would be a change in the detailed plan. The detailed plan would increase the gross floor area in the footprint. The current plan showed less square footage authorized than what was proposed. Another change was the parking lot to the east was in a two family district and the zoning ordinance allowed parking lots on the same lot to be built in a two family district. The following ordinance was consideredt NO. 93-090 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM TWO-FAMILY (2-F) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR .135 ACRE OF LAND AND INCLUDING SUCH LAND IN PD-108 ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 88-168; REVISING THE DETAILED PLAN FOR PD 108 TO INCLUDE 15 SPACES AND ENLARGING THE PD TO 1.489 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARROLL BOULEVARD, NORTH OF HIGHLAND AND SOUTH OF WEST PRAIRIE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $20000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Brock seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott 'lays", Miller "ays", Smith llayelt, Chew "aye", Perry Itaye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council hold a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance rezoning a .871 acre tract from the Commercial district to the Planned Development district on property located on the east side of S. Locust, west side of Wainwright, north of E. Prairie for the purpose of a mixed use development consisting of office, restaurant, and apartment type uses. Z93-008 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this would be a rezoning from Commercial to PD for a mixed use building. This was a site plan in the PD district. There would be no additional building but would allow the second floor to be used as apartments. There was not enough parking in the lot for all of the uses in the location. The ordinance would require that before building permits were issued or certificates of occupancy issued for the apartments, there be a declaration between the owners of c Agenda No, AgendaUe Pala City of Denton City Council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 11 the property to allow for shared parking. The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Mayor Castleberry asked if parking for the apartments over the restaurant would have designated places on Wainwright. Robbins replied not on Wainwright. There would only be off-street parking in the two lots adjacent the buildings. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-091 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM COMMERCIAL (C) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR .871 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTH LOCUST STREET, WEST OF WAINWRIGHT STREET AND NORTH OF EAST PRAIRIE STREET1 PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF! AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Brock motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "ayell, Cott "ayo'O, Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry $laye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance amending Planned Development No. 72 allowing single-family detached residential use according to SF-7 district standards in the area plattad as Cooper's Landing, Section IV, which is currently designated for duplex/4-plax use. The amendment would also modify a condition of the approved ordinance 84-50 so as -lot to require detailed plans for single-family detached land use. The 15.174 acre tract was located north of Windsor Drive and east of Locust Street. Z93-009 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this was a downtoning of a planned development approved in 1984 along with plat approval in 1955. The planned development needed to be adjusted to be in accordance with the plat. The single family -7 R n. eJ / L AQendsNe C~ Agendal Date City of Denton city council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 12 standards would be in effect and would remain in a planned development zoning district. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended continuing a condition in the 1984 ordinance which waived site plans for the single-family detached land use. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Wade Harris had completed a speaker card in support but did not wish to address the council. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition, The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: 93-092 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 84-50 RELATING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) NO. 72 PLATTED AS COOPERS LANDING SECTION FOUR LOCATED NORTH OF WINDSOR DRIVE, EAST OF LOCUST STREET, AND GENERALLY SOUTHWEST OF BELL AVENUE BY CHANGING THE. DESIGNATED USE OF DUPLEX/4-FLEX ON THE CONCEPT PLAN TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-DETACHED USE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE LAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance, On roll voted Brock "aye", Cott 'lays", Miller 'lays", Smith "aye", Chew aye o Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. The Council considered Agenda Item 010. 10, The Council considered an exemption to the noise ordinance on Friday, June 18, until midnight for the Juneteenth celebration at Fred Moore Park, Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that at its last meeting Council considered a request for a Saturday exemption, This was a request for a Friday exemption. Chow vote, motioned "aye" # Cott ' aye ",t Miller "aye"/ requests roll 'Pays"n Chew 'lays", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously, cL jgendaN0 Agenda l l Date City of Denton City Council Minutes c1~~ y June 1, 1993 Page 13 The Council considered Agenda Item Ili. 11. The Council considered a request from the North Texas State Fair Association for an exemption from the noise ordinance during the North Texas State Fair and Rodeo, August 20-30, 1993. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that this was a request from James Roden of the North Texas Fair Association for an exemption from the noise ordinance. The dates would be Monday- Thursday, August 23-26 until 11 p.m.l Friday and Saturday, August 20-21 and August 27-28 until midnights and Sunday, August 22 from 1100 p.m. - 11100 p.m. and Sunday, August 29 from 8100 a,m. - 4100 p.m. This was a similar request made last year. There were concerns from the neighborhood regarding the noise. The Police Department was working with the Fair group to discuss security. The Fair Board was willing to meet with the neighbors regarding the event. An ordinance would be brought to Council regarding no parking in the area during the event after it had been finalized in the Legal Department. The proposed ordinance with have a towing provision which was felt to be more effective than straight no parking provisions. Fred Harper spoke regarding the issue. He owned property on Carroll Blvd. which was across from the Fairgrounds and was a member of the Fair Association. He asked for a favorable response to the request. Security was very good at the Fair and updated the Council on their on-going provisions to make the Fair safe. This year the Fair would be using the services of Clay Powers, an expert on sound, to assist with the design of the Fair's sound system. Bob Powers stated that he would respond to questions if needed. Gene Truss stated that notice for this meeting was inadequate and that this was the second year in a row that the notice had been inadequate. He asked Council to postpone ruling on the request until the neighbors had met with Fair representatives. Last June the neighbors had had a meeting with Fair members and some effort had been made to correct problems, Time was needed to discuss problems and there was the possibility that some members of the Fair Association had differences of options regarding the situations. Change and adaptation needed to occur especially on the noise level. He was confident that activities could be made for all the community without hampering the neighborhood. Belinda Martin stated that she was concerned about the noise from the Fairgrounds and that a way was needed to eliminate some of the noise, Her children could not sleep due to the noise. She asked council to not grant the exemption. AWdaND. C~~ f a~end tf - City of Denton city Council Date June 1, 1993 Minutes Page 14 06 Jim Griffin stated that he owned a business across the street from the Fairgrounds, He had no problem with and supported the Fair. Council Member Brock stated tgghat the letter from Mr. Roden asked horwPermanent relief reatrdin the noise ordinance, no noise ordinance, asked if Tuck replied that staff was only addressing the other part of the request at this meeting. Council might want to discuss other provisions and direct staff date. to study those provisions at a later Mayor Pro Tom Smith stated that part of the discussion from last year centered around the exemption for 8100 a.m. on Sunday. asked what events would be going on from 8:00 a.m. - 1r00 the last Sunday, She P.m. on Tuck replied it was the goat show, Roden stated that the exemption request was for the use of the public address system to call contestants to the arena, It would not be the outdoor public aditess system, The request was made as the current ordinance not allow the use on Sunday, of a pubic address system Mayor Pro Tom Smith expressed concerns regarding church services which would be going on during that time, Roden felt that the public address system could not be heard in the church as it was only intended for the barns. Mayor Castleberry stated that this was a similar request from last year, He had attended n neighborhood meeting and saw the willingness of the neighborhood to work with the Fair Association and the Association with the neighbors, He felt that cooperation would continue, Approving the dates now would allow the Association to work ahead with the neighbors, Council Member Cott recommended that the no parking issue be very clear so that there were no misunderstdndings regarding parking in the area. Miller motioned, Cott seconded to approve the request, Council Member Perry stated that some of the Fair schedule involved school determi eimit the spaireacould there cut adoneon aschool ani hts~,e8t to Two neighborhoods affeld where there were children were the Parka de ww r+ Vek 10 agenda lle " r ~bte ~f City of Denton City Council Minutes June 1, 1993 - T~ Page 15 area and the immediate neighborhood. There had been an effort on better control on sound. Still the request was for school nights for only a one hour exemption. He did not approve of the extension to 11:00 p.m, on school nights. He might agree to the extension on the night of the rodeo but not the four nights until midnight as it was it was too much for the neighborhood. Bob Powers stated that the rodeo was over at 10:00 p.m. One night last year it did run late but stopped when it was discovered it was past the time limit. The bands stopped at 11:00 p.m. Last year as soon the Fair received a noise complaint, someone went to that location to check the sound. If the band could be heard, a report was made back to turn down the volume and then the location was checked again. He felt that the Association had done everything it could regarding noise and were trying to answer all of the complaints. Council Member Perry asked about the consultant for the sound system. Powers replied that there was always a problem with an outdoor facility but they would be trying to correct that problem. There would be a different system from last year. Council Member Perry asked if the Association had recently talked with the neighbors regarding this issue. Powers replied that three weeks ago they had talked with the pastor of the neighboring church. He had indicated no problems with the Fair. Mayor Castleberry asked if the public schools would be in session during that time. Tuck responded correct. Council Member Cott stated that with the urbanization of Denton, it was wonderful to have a Fair like this. He did not want it pushed out of community. Mayor Pro Tom Smith asked if the Association had contracts with bands to play until midnight, Powers replied yes that some had already been signed. Mayor Pro Tom Smith asked if there were no way on school nights to keep with the 10:00 p.m, provisions. Onda No. {gen it ~ , City of Denton city council Minutes June 1, 1993 v Page lb Powers replied that 11:00 p.m. would help their activities. Council Member Cott stated that if too many restrictions were placed on the performers, the Fair would not be able to get quality performers. Council Member Miller stated that the Fair had been in its location for 45 years. There were other issues which needed to be dealt with including parking and working with the neighborhood group. The Council had recently passed a resolution dealing with the DFw Airport. Other cities indicated that the resolution should not be passed due to the noise of the airport. The airport was there and was an economic machine for the area. He felt it was a trade off of one hour a night for the Fair. He felt it was not unreasonable to ask for the exemption. If the Fair were faced with this every year, then the community might have to rethink whether to have a Fair. Council Member Perry suggested that Council needed to continue to look at what the Fair was doing and the impact on others around the Fair. He would like to move away from having the Fair on school nights and felt that over a period of time the schedule could be worked out. Council Member Cott felt that the Fair needed to be competitive in order to have a quality show. If there were not the right kind of attitude, they would not come to Denton. He felt that the Fair was important to the quality of life for Denton. Council Member Brock stated that last year she had received a noise complaint around 10:30 p.m. on a Sunday night. A very loud band was playing and she went to a location approximately 5 blocks to the northeast. The bass from the music could be heard and made it difficult for the children in the home to sleep. The home had no central air and had to have the windows open. There was a real problem with that band. The music did quit immediately at 11:00 p.m. She appreciated the efforts of the Fair to control and the cleanliness of the ar parking ea. Another problem was the e loudspeakers in the arena. She urged the Fair Association to work with the musical groups to make sure the sound would be reasonable and that the loudspeakers were turned off at the appropriate time. The Council did not have a problem with asking for the Juneteenth organizers and other groups to make exemption requests on a yearly basis and felt that there would be no problem having the Fair asking once a year for such an exemption. Mayor Castleberry indicated that the Fairgrounds did much for Denton more than just during the Fair. There were many people in f 1 X Agenda No, ct ~ ~ Agendalfe case _ 7' City of Denton City Council Minutes June 1, 1993 DD Page 17 Denton and Denton county who liked the Fair. Noise exemptions were made for the Arts Festival and other events and felt that the Fair request was not unreasonable. The Fair was working wi'zh the neighborhood association to resolve problems. On roll vote, Brock Faye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", chew "aye", Perry "nay", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried with a 6-1 vote. 5. Consent Agenda Perry motioned, Smith seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase orders: 1. Bid 01487 - Water Treatment Chemicals 2. Bid 11495 - Toxicity Testing 3. Bid 01497 - Total Carbon Analyzer 4. Bid 01501 - IBM RISC/6000 5. Bid 01505 - Leaue of Scraper 6. P.O. 034597 - Goldwaites of Texas Inc. 7. P.O. 134760 - I.B.M. a. Change Order No. 8 - P.O. 026052A - Gracon Construction Company 9. Check Requisition - W. B. Rummell 6. ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and awarding a contract for purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.1. - Bid 01487, 5.A.2. - Bid 11495, 5.A.3. - Bid 11497, 5.A.4. - Bid 115010 5.A.5. - Bid 01505) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-093 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. C ~ Agenda No. Ag6ndaIl m '93k Dale - 9 3 City of Denton city council Minutes 0(6q June It 1993 Page 18 Smith motioned, Miller seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith Faye", Chew unanimouslyy "aye',, and Mayor Castleberry 'aye". Motion carried B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance awarding a contract for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. (5.A.6. - PO 134597) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-094 AN ORDINANCE AWARDING- A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution of a change order to a contract between the City of Denton and Gracon Construction company; and providing for an increase in the contract price. (5.A.8. - P.O. 026052A - Gracon Construction) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 94-095 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF CH.INGE ORDER NO. 8 TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND GRACON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT PRICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Brock seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council of an for the a penditure cofsif nds a or tion purchases rofnamaterialsdior equipment which are available from one source in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. (5.A.7. - PO 134760) r I i Agenda No, C'f Agendalte Date ` City of Denton City Council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 19 The following ordinance was considered: NO. 94-096 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PURCHASES OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FROM ONLY ONE SOURCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Brock seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll voter preoc "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew unanimouslyY "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried E. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving the purchase of a utility easement and temporary construction easement from W. B. Rummell and Betty Ann Rummell. (5.A.9. - Check Requisition - W. B. Rummell) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-097 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A UTILITY EASEMENT AND TTAPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FROM W. B. RUMMELL AND BETTY ANN RUMMELL; AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On rill vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye" Smith "aye", Chew "aye", perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. F. The Council considere adotion of an ordinance arovin and authorizing the City Manager to execute a compromise settlement release of all claims in the matter of Gamble v Ci .+f n..+o„ Texas. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-098 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS IN THE MATTER OF 2AhgLE V CITY OF UENTON T A ; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. pF fr, Am A No AQendaltem~~ Date City of Denton City Council Minutes U June 1, 1993 Page 20 Perry motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. G. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the State of Texas, acting by and through the Texas Department of Transportation, for participation in a landscape cost sharing program project on F.M. 2181 from interstate Highway 35 to Bent Oak Drive. (The Keep Denton Beautiful Commission endorsed the plan on January 6, 1992 and Council approved the cost sharing values on February 2, 1992. The 191 Committee recommended approval of the funding source.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this was a continuation of one of the projects recommended by the Beautification Commission and involved major landscaping along medians in Denton such as University Drive and Dallas Drive. Another component of Dallas Drive was entirely funded by the State when the City won the Governorts Community Achievement award for landscaping. He also announced that the City had just won another $100,000 from the state. He indicated a cost breakdown on the project. There were two elements which required City cash which included the irrigation and the trees which the t91 Committee had recommended the funding source. The other elements which the City was given credit for included design and maintenance which did not require any cash. Council Member Cott asked if bond money had been approved for this project. Robbins replied that specific bonds funds were not but the improvement of Teasley was approved. council Member Cott stated that there was bond money left over which was not used but also not authorized for this specific project. Robbins replied correct except that it was known that this kind of improvement was authorized by the voters. Council Member Miller stated that the bond issue might not have specifically stated that the project would include the highway improvement and landscaping but for a complete project it was understood that Teasley Lane would include the landscaping. The intent was there and the project was in the bond issue. s AUMNo.Ci Agen'd~j11l]t City of Denton city council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 21 The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-099 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF TEXAS, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FOR PARTICIPATION IN A LANDSCAPE COST SHARING PROGRAM PROJECT ON FM 2181 FROM INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35 TO BENT OAK DRIVE; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR.; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote# Brock "aye"~ Cott "aye", Miller "aye" " n "aye", Perry aye , and Mayor Castleberry 'ra'e"Smith aye , Chew unanimously. Y Motion carried H. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute a settlement agreement between the City of Denton and Green Springs Water Supply corporation. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that this matter had been discussed with Council and recommended for settlement by the Austin attorneys and Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-100 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND GREEN SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew unanimouslyY "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried 1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for professional engineering services to design a continuous emissions monitoring system for members of the Texas Municipal Power Pool. Bob Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities, stated that as a result of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments, the City was required to install a continuous emissions monitoring system on two of the f } L 4Q"da NO 4geodal City of Denton City Council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 22 Power plants. This was the same type of equipment which was going to have to be put on other utilities in the Texas Municipal Power Pool. The City had decided to do the engineering services for that project, joining with Garland, Bryan and Greenville. Denton 's share of the jointly project would be $130000. Council Member Cott asked what was the cost for the whole project. Nelson replied that the two emissions systems continuous emissions monitoring systems for units four and five was approximatel project and y $350,000. Council Member Cott asked for TMPA's share. Nelson replied that over the years T11PA had continued to put in emissions monitoring systems and he was not sure of the amount they had invested to date. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-101 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES TO DESIGN A CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS MONITORING SYSTEM FOR MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER POOL; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petry Brockne o Chew ecoadedr to adopt the ordinance. On roll Playa$$, Cott unani, Perry ++aye++, and Mayor Castleberry Y aYe„Smi Motioneoarried unanimously, 7. Resolutions A, The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an interlocal agreement with the County of Denton for the construction of improvements to Mayhill Road between McKinney Street and Highway 380. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manger, stated that this item had been discussed with the Council at a prior work session which involved using unused bond funds for Hobson and Mayhill. Staff had suggested trying to receive funds from the County for their portion of Mayhill. This resolution would authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement for $30,000. Council Member Cott asked what it cost the City to accept the County money. AflendaNe. - A6endalte Date `7 3 City of Denton city council minutes June 1, 1993 Page 23 Svehla replied that the project involved approximately of the roadway feet of roadway to repave. Approximately County roadway and the money from the County was 351 of the total cost of the project. Council agreed to spend $50,000 for the City's portion. Council Member Brock indicated that this project would help improve access to Ryan High School. The following resolution was considered: NO. R93-032 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL STREET NAND IMPROVEMENTS T TO HMAYHILL Y ROAD EBETWE NE~MCTHE KINNEYCONSTRUCTION HIGHWAY 380; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Cott motioned, Miller seconded to approve the resolution. On roll voteBrock "aye", s'CastleberryY' aye". Smith tion ,carried "aye", Perry aye', and Mayor unanimously. B. The Council considered approval of a resolution creating the Juvenile Diversion Task Force to formulate and provide to the City assist in Council rehabilitati nh of eJuvenile diversion s program to offenders. Harlan Jefferson, Director of Treasury Operations, stated that this discussed at, several previous work sessions. At l had sessions, Council had made suggestions for additional agenciesetoabe included ISD Advisory Board no 1ngereexhad istedeandwasnt incorporated the D included. Mayor Pro Ten Smith indicated that there was no slot for a person not aligned with suggested the need to have some open spots for those individuals Council Member Miller suggested including three at-large pisitions. The following resolution was considered: } i5 { P . pOnda No.W Agendatte City of Denton City Council Minutes Omle r l June 1, 1993 6t/ Page 24 NO. R93-033 A RESOLUTION CREATING THE JUVENILE DIVERSION TASK FORCETHE TO FORMULATE AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL RELATING TO THE NEED OF A DIVERSION PROGRAM TO ASSIST IN REHABILITATION OF JUVENILE OFFENDERS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Council Member Cott left the meeting. Brock motioned, Smith seconded to approie the resolution with the addition of three at-large positions. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye,,, Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. authorizinghthe City Manager considered to e submit ae application of a resolution Water Commission for a grant to fund a household the Texas used oil collection program and execute any required agreement concerning the grant; r.!,d providing for certain assurances related to the grant. Council Member Cott returned to the meeting. Bill Angelo, Director of Community Services, stated that the City had received a prior grant for $17,500 to start such a program and were in the process of installing a central location. Recently the Texas Water Commission had reopened the grant categories and the City had the possibility of obtaining funds for satellite stations. Currently there were five locations in the community to collect used oil which were at the fire stations. The grant would ask for $20,000 from the State. The City would have to agree to fund the program and operate it for at least a and rovide the disposal of any contaminated oil. The Cityrhad an ag eementrwith an individual who would take the used oil at no charge. If the oil were contaminated it would have to be disposed of at a hazardous wasto3 facility. Council Member Perry asked if this applied to only household oil and not to industrial oil waste. Angelo replied that a commercial entity could use the facili~.y, however they generally had their own program. Council member Perry asked if the City Council would be responsible for any contaminated oil. • L 6' a6fldeltem n,F City of Denton City Council Minutes ,'3c U~o June 1, 1993 Page 25 Angelo responded that the City would be responsible to a certain extent. If the oil were disposed illegally, it would cost more than if the City did it correctly. Council Member Brock asked if the $6,000 was the nnly expense which would be involved. Angelo replied that staff time would be approximately $7,000 to administer the program, $150 for office su?plies and $850 from the State for signage and brochures to advertise the program. Council Member Brock stated that the State grant would be for the purchase of the containers. Angelo replied that approximately $1,476 would be for a part-time intern, $850 for office supplies, $10,000 for the containers, $6100 for contractual items such as concrete pad to hold the containers. Council Member Cott asked if Safety Clean did this same type of work. Angelo replied that they recycled other materials but was not sure about used oil. Chief Auto Parts recycled used oil. Council Member Cott suggested contacting Safety Clean to see if they did such a program. Mayor Pro Tem Smith indicated that Angelo's next budget would have this package in it and if the City applied for the grant, Council needed to remember that they were committed to this package. The following resolution was considered: NO. R93-034 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO THE TEXAS WATER COMMISSION FOR A GRANT TO FUND A HOUSEHOLD USED OIL COLLECTION PROGRAM AND EXECUTE ANY REQUIRED AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE GRANT; PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN ASSURANCES RELATED TO THE GRANT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Perry seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew $'aye", Perry "ay,110 and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. After a short recess, Council Members Brock and Miller were absent. t 4 !Y 1 Ap ids No. _ 4 AAeedalte < Cate 2 ` L-~ City of Denton City Council Minutes ct If June 1, 1993 Z Page 26 8. The council considered approval of a special permit to allow work to be performed in conjunction with the Teasley Lane utility relocation project on Sundays when deemed an emergency situation as determined by the city Engineer. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that this request would grant permission to work on Sundays on the Teasley Lane project if necessary due to the weather. The contract indicated that the project had to be completed within 65 days which was August 1, 1993. The day the Council approved the contract allowed for 65 days of work. Staff did not think that Sunday work would be necessary but it was imperative that the project be completed by August 10 1993 in order to keep Teasley on schedule with the Highway Department. Council Members Brock and Miller joined the meeting. Council Member Cott stated there were three churches in the area. He was concerned that the construction work would disturb services unless it were done after 1 p.m. and stop before 6 p.m. Svehla replied that the southern end of the project would be done first. If work had to be done in those areas the church services would be taken into consideration and staff would visit with churches regarding the construction. Council Member Cott felt that if staff asked the churches about the construction, they would say yes as they were very community minded. City Manager Harrell stated that if the project were not completed by the August 1 date, Teasley Lane would slip on the State's schedule. Work would not be done in the vicinity of churches so as to disturb services. Council Member Miller stated that the reason this project was moved up on the schedule was that the city gave assurances that it would be ready for the Status letting schedule. He felt the request should be approved and that every attempt would be made to not interfere with church services when in the area on those days. Council Member Perry asked if the contractor would be willing to agree with that type of provision. Svehla replied that thc. contractor took direction from the City. Council Member Perry felt it was imperative to complete the project on time bearing in mind the churches in the area. I j N091 2f3 Agendaft Este City of Denton City Council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 27 Svehla replied that work would start on Hobson and then if work was required on Sundays they would be away from the churches. Council member Cott asked if it were possible to work at night to make up hours if necessary. Mayor Castleberry felt that it could be left to staff direction. City Manager Harrell stated that staff heard the concerns of Council and if the exemption were authorized, staff would be very sensitive to authorizing work so as to not disturb any church services. Council Member Miller suggested visiting with the churches after approval of the request to inform them of what would be happening. Council Member Cott asked again if night work would be possible. Svehla replied that it might be but would require extra lighting and extra costs for the project. Council Member Cott asked staff to investigate that option. Council Member Miller felt that it would be a trade off dealing with noise, trading one problem for fifty other problems. The intent was very clear what the Council wanted and the work would be done only if necessary. Miller motioned, Chew seconded to grant the special permit noting the Council's concerns for the area churches. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "nay", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried with a 6-1 vote. 9. The Council considered approval of the Army Corps of Engineer's recommendation (Alternative F) for repair of the Ray Roberts embankment. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that when the Corps designed the face of the dam they did not realize the ferocity of the area winds and the length of the reservoir and more erosion on the face of the dam had occurred than anticipated. The Corps felt it was necessary to put in rock riprap on the lower portions of the dam, approximately 7 feet below the water line. The total cost of the project would be $6.7 million with Denton's share being $1.2 million. This added to the debt service at a fifty year payout at 7.21% interest. To accomplish the work, the Corps needed a letter from Denton and Dallas supporting +#O# No City of Denton City Council Minutes ` L June 1,1993 UV( I Page 28 modification and change. In order to do the work the Corps would have to drop the reservoir 7 1/2 feet and would start in the middle of next week. The gates would be almost full open for about 6 weeks to approximately the end of July in order to lower the lake by 7 /2 feet. The lake would stay at that level for the entire construction time which would be approximately 18 months. The Corps hoped that it would not take that much time but Denton really did not have much choice in the approval. If the Corps waited on the project it might be at a point when the water was needed in the reservoir and it would not be good timing to reduce the water level. Mayor Pro Tom Smith asked what the lowering of the water level would do to the recreational facilities. Nelson stated the ramps were designed to accommodate those levels and the shore line would be further out. This was a design that the Corps used successfully with other dams. Council Member Miller stated that he had heard that the original design had this type of construction but that it had been taken out due to cost factors. Nelson indicated that he did not know whether that was true or not. council Member Miller felt it was worth investigating. Howard Martin, Director of Environmental Operations and Financial Administration, stated that he was not sure if it had been in the original design. one of the contributing factors for the erosion was due to the water level. other projects had lower water levels on different levels. There had been three years of constant water level of the lake which made it different from other dams with similar construction. Council Member Brock stated that the City had no choice in this matter. Nelson stated there was very little other than waiting for a few years. Had it been in the original program the project would not have cost as much but still would have been an expensive amount. Perry motioned, Chew seconded to approve the request. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "ape", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. The Council considered Work Session Item 03. 11 "ndtNo. 02{^~ L Age dal nP4 Oete _ City of Denton City council i•inutes j O June 1, 1993 Page 29 3. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding the appointment of Council Members to various Council committees and gave staff direction. city Manager Harrell stated that Council committees had been listed with current members and vacancies. Staff needed direction from council for appointments. Council Member Miller suggested an informal poll regarding which Member was interested in which committee. Council Member Cott asked for a description of the Vision duties. City Manager Harrell stated that each sponsoring agency committed two members to serve on the project cabinet in charge of directing the entire project. In addition to two cabinet members, as many others as desiring could participate in some form on a committee. Council Member miller suggested adding a juvenile task force liaison to the municipal Court Advisory Committee. Mayor Pro Tem Smith suggested appointing Council Members Miller and Brock as the Vision representatives if they would be willing. Council Member Brock indicated that she would be willing to serve as that representative and would be willing to go off the Audit Committee. Mayor Pro Tam Smith suggested appointing Council Member Cott to the Audit Committee or the Investment Policy Committee. City Manager Harrell reviewed the duties of each committee for the council. Council Member Cott stated that he would like to represent the Council on a subcommittas of the Vision program regarding aging and how to direct the community toward that subject. Council considered item /12. 12. The Council considered appointments to various Council committees: A. Agenda Committee B. Audit Committee C. Economic Development Committee D. Investment Policy Committee E. Municipal Court Advisory Committee I vgdsNa T ' Q21 8tt T J City of Denton city council minutes June 1, 1993 Page 30 F. w Vision for Denton Chew motioned, Smith seconded to nominate, the following Council Members to the following committees: Agenda Committee - Mayor Castleberry Council Member Perry Audit Committee - Mayor Castleberry Mayor Pro Tom Smith Council Member Cott Economic Development Committee - Council Member Perry Mayor Castleberry Investment Policy Committee - Council Member Cott Municipal Court Advisory Committee/Liaison to Diversion Program/Municipal Court of Record - Council Member Chew Mayor Pro Tem Smith Council Member Miller Vision for Denton - 21st Century - Council Member Miller Council Member Brock on roll vote, Brock "aye's, Cott "aye's, Miller Hays", Smith "aye", Chew Olaye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. The Council considered Work Session Item 14. 4. The council received a report and held a discussion regarding a study of the city's Animal Control ordinances and gave staff direction. Nonie Kull, Environmental Health So--vices Manager, stated that staff had received some additional concerns from the Denton Humane Society regarding additional animals on the site. Staff had also received a complaint that day from an individual who adopted an animal from the Hartfelt Humane Society and had subsequent problems with that animal. There had also been a complaint on the Grooming Den which was housed at 1800 Fort Worth Drive but was not a part of Hartfelt. The Grooming Den was owned and operated by Laura Gill. The City had received a letter from the Texas Department of Health in response to the Mayor's letter. Dr. Murnaine indicated that there had been no request for reinspection from the owners of the shelter, The shelter legislation was no longer an option as it had NendaNo. J Agendalte o~te City of Denton City Council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 31 died in session. There were three options which the Council might want to consider, option one dealt with the creation of an animal control inspection ordinance. Such an ordinance would, however, be limited to commercial facilities which historically did not have violation problems. Council Member Miller asked why it would have to be confined to commercial facilities. Why could it not include intent for the co:,duction of business whether non-profit or for profit. Kull ccurrentreplied that the owner only atd provided the what City was inspect. The current ordinance was a public health document, not an animal welfare document. Animal welfare ha:i traditionally been left to humane organizations. There was nothing in the current ordinance dealing with animals. That could be changed but then the standard would be involved with the Penal Code which was a Class A misdemeanor. Council Member Miller asked if there was a problem with the offense remaining a Class A misdemeanor or could the City not do that. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that if there was a particular conduct which was defined as a Class A misdemeanor under Skate, the City could not regulate that conduct. Council Member Miller stated that there were animals being adopted out of a supposedly closed facility. A State agency would not do a reinspection until invited in for such an inspection. The City seemed powerless to do anything about the issue. If the City accepted the State definitions of Class A and developed an ordinance around those definitions, could the City initiate a policing process or was the entire process preempted by the State. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that it was preempted by the State but that the City could direct that the resources of the Police Department and Animal Control Officers work with the District Attorney's office to deal with those cases. An ordinance was not needed to enforce the current Class A offenses. City Manager Harrell stated that cases could not be filed in Municipal Court. Everything would have to go to District Court. This would enter an area which the City had never taken responsibility for and would have to make sufficient cases for the demandst Attoinsy This option otmore some would the have her alternatives. It could be done if the city were willing to make that kind of allocation. C~ `~-CSC Agenda No. r AgendartR Date l ' - l City of Denton City Council Minutes C.C ~F June 1, 1993 Page 32 Kull stated that Option two would be to limit the number of animals which each individual could have at his home. Option one was not the best solution for animals or for people. option three would involve expanding/defining the health officer's responsibilities. This would allow dealing with commercial, private property and non- profit locations. Definitions would be clarified such as City Health Officer, unhealthy, unsanitary, etc. Council Member Miller asked if it would include disease. Kull replied yes for commonly contagious diseases. Council Member Miller asked if that option would be effective and what would it be able to do with Hartfelt. Would the City have the authority to do something regarding such a situation. Kull replied yes that that would be the intent. It would set standards and create an aspect of the ordinance which the City could respond to and take legal action to remedy the situation. City Manager Harrell stated that the process would be to inspect a location, site the violations and then have the Municipal Judge deal with the situation. Council Member Cott asked how Hartfelt was paid for the animals. Kull replied through donations. Council Member Cott asked about tax requirements on these donations. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that she was not familiar with the particular tax consequences. However, if it were a donation to a charitable organization..... Council Member Cott suggested checking into that aspect. City Manager Harrell stated that as a municipal government, the City would have no authority to look at books but could call the internal Revenue Service and suggest that they might want to follow-up on the situation. Council Member Perry felt that option three would give a clear course of action and suggested starting on that option. Miller motioned, Cott seconded to pursue option three. x'15 ~ CAL + Agenda No. Agendalt City of Denton City Council Minutes Gate (j !(t~j , June 1, 1993 Page 33 Council Member Cott suggested an amendment to determine whether it would be proper to inform the IRS regarding donations to Hartfelt. Council Member Miller stated that he would not accept that amendment as it could be perceived as harassment. Council Member Cott withdrew his potion for amendment. Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked how the City would know to enforce the proposed ordinance. Would the City have to depend on referrals from individuals or inspections by the City. Kull replied that it would be a complaint only basis. on roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. City Manager Harrell stated that staff was notified today that Hartfelt was going to be sold or transferred to a new owner. The new owner had asked to speak to Council at the next meeting. council considered Work Session Item 05. 5. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding recommendations of the 191 Committee and gave staff direction. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated Council had already considered portions of this item. Several weeks ago, Council approved using interest funds from the street bond issues to build an access road to Bonnie Brea at North Lakes Park. Earlier in the evening the Council had approved landscaping on Teasley Lane. At their May 17, 1993 meeting, the 191 Committee recommended a number of small projects to be built from funds left over from unspent bonds from prior projects which Council had approved. These were bonds approved by the voters for the projects for which there was money left over. The actual bonds as passed by the voters were for streets and related projects for streets. Sums of the projects included street work, ADA work and signal work. Council Member Cott asked if these items were originally approved by the voters for Teasley Lane. Svehla replied no that none of these projects were included in the original bond vote. The vote taken in 1985-86 was for street bonds. Council set up the 191 Committee to oversee that all of the money was spent for the projects voted on and it also had evolved into the group which was recommending what to do with left over agendo Mo. Agend Ite J Late t_,_C City of Denton City Council Minutes cG r~[~~ June 1, 1993 Page 34 funds. Council Member Miller stated that the left over funds from park bonds were used for parks and street bonds were for streets. Council Member Cott asked Council Member Miller if he were comfortable with the fact that the monies to be used for Teasley Lane were voted for streets whichever street it was. Council Member Miller stated that everytime that the 091 Committee looked at a variation for funds it was always recommended that street money be spent on streets or sidewalks and park money be used in parks. Svehla replied that actual monies were from different projects. None of the money actually came from the Teasley project. Council Member Cott stated that these were pieces left over from the projects and these pieces were not necessarily voted for by voters. Svehla replied that was correct. All of the bond projects had been finished. Council Member Cott suggested paying off the bonds with the left over funds rather than using the money on projects. He recommended that if the money were voted for other reasons and other purposes, even though the 192 Committee gave approval it be used to pay off the bonds. Council Member Miller asked if when Council Member Cott referred to "other purposes" were those for specific locations or for general purposes. Council Member Cott felt that the bonds were voted for specific streets and sidewalks. Council Member Miller stated that the improvements which had taken place over the last 7-8 years had been considered on the basis that the 191 Committee was based on the intent of the bond issue. Council Member Cott suggested that another interpretation might be to pay off the bonds rather than do other projects. He asked why the 191 Committee had been formed. Council Member Miller replied that it was to oversee the bond funds to make sure the funds were used for what the people had voted for such as street funds would be used for streets, etc. 1~gendaNo.C CJ ; Apndi lem-~, City of Denton City Council Minutes June 1, 1993 Page 35 City Manager Harrell stated that when the City was putting the 1986 bond issue together, a criticism heard was that the City in the past stated that it was going to do a certain project and then later changed that project. The 191 Committee was appointed to be a watchdog and take every project as promised to the voters and make sure and report to Council that those projects were being done. All projects promised to the voters had been done with 1986 bond money. Due to interest money and good bids, it was possible to do these extra projects and could be done legally within the confines of the bond project. Council Member Cott suggested that next time a bond project were done, it be fine tuned for better communication. He had heard citizens ask why spend the extra money, why not turn it back to the bonds. Chew motioned, Perry seconded to give staff direction to follow the recommendations of the 191 Committee. Council Member Miller stated that he took exception to what Council Member Cott was saying. The bond issue could be fine tuned perhaps with a proviso which might indicate that o`her jobs could be done as assigned. He had heard :,any compliments regarding the extra jobs. on roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aya", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 13. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items A. A reminder regarding the refunding issue for the June 8 meeting. The bonds would be priced on Thursday as a negotiated sale. John McGrans felt that the City would save approximately $2.4 million over the life of the bonds for the utility issue and a smaller amount for the general obligation bonds. 14. There was no official action taken on Executive Session items discussed during the work Session Executive Session. 154 New Business The following items of New Business were suggested by Council Members for future agendas= AgendaNo.__. Agendalte~ Date - ..c City of Denton city council Minutes U / June 1, 1993 u( Page 36 A. Council Member Miller gave a compliment on the renovation of the swimming pool. B. Council Member Miller requested that Council review the tree ordinance for a provision to be included for a designated historical tree. City Manager Harrell stated that normally if the entire Council asked for such an item, it would be referred to the Planning and Zoning commission to study the issue. He asked if that procedure would be acceptable. After discussion, consensus of the Council was to request staff to review the tree ordinance for a special tree provision. C. Council Member Miller asked if anything could be done with the street in front of McNair School. D. Council Member Cott asked for a similar study of the street in front of Liberty Christian School. E. Council Member Miller indicated that the recycling bins off of Dallas Drive were not user friendly for older people. for staff F. Council Member current ordinance relative to lqualific qualifications that board/commission members as related to delinquent taxes, etc. G, Council Member Brock asked about the status of the public drinking legislation. There was a problem in southeast Denton when Fred Moore Park closed. Individual were using a nearby street for a place to party plus loud music was coming from passing cars. H. Mayor Pro Tom Smith asked Council for a date to clean their adopt-a-spot. After discussion it was decided that a date would be set at the next meeting. 16. There was no Executive Session held during the Regular Session. With no further business,the meeting was adjourned at 11: 00 p.m. JENNIFER WALTERS BOB CASTLEBERRY CITY SECRETARY MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACCO011C i CITY COUNCIL or o~ A` • ~ o ~ s d "W Q 9 6 1339L AQ4AdiNd. 9 area i ~ Ode NO., AN ORDINANCE ADDING IV ODE OF ORDINANCES OF THELCITY.OF DENTON~ITJW# OT BE C13 OF THE OMPRISED OF SECTIONS 13-40 THROUGH 13-45; DESIGNATING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, AND FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AS NONSMOKING AREAS; PROVIDING SIGN REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR NONSMOKING AREAS; REQUIRING WRITTEN POLICIES IMPLEMENTING THIS ARTICLE- PROHIBITING SMOKING IN DESIGNATED NONSMOKING AREAS; PROVIDING EXEMPTIONS; PROVIDING PENALTIES- PROVIDING A SEYERABILITY CLAUSEI AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the smoking of tobacco or weeds or other plant products has been demonstrated to have a detrimental affect on not only the smoker but others in close proximity to the smoker; and WHEREAS, It to the right of citizens to be able to choose for themselves whether to smoke either actively or passively; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City to encourage food establishments which have enclosed dining areas to provide a"equate seating for those patrons who prefer a smoke-free environment; and WHEREAS, the citizen] of Denton have demonstrated a desire to voluntarilyy comply with City ordinances wnich protect public health and velfore; and WHEREAS regulations regarding smoking can and ahould be enforced only on a complaint basis; and WHEREAS, such enforcement would be effective without substantial additional cost to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION ON I. the Denton~tTexas,eis harobthamendedobyOaddtngnci ew ArticleyIVf Sections 13.40 through 13.45, to read as follows; ARTICLE IV. SMOKING Sec. 13.40. Definitions not moans the public, area iof an ncludinbut establishment limited to individual offices, stockrooms, seployea lounges, or meeting rooms, Departmentirdejlggnatedato ethe Di nforceeandradministertthisuArticle Health or the Director's daoignated reprecontatLve. (3) "Food Esoablishmant" means any operation defined as such in Section 11.20 of the Denton City Code, q r i Agenda No 9 r1 Aoendilt ~i(s h- "Hospital" means any institution that provides medical, surgical, and overnight facilities for pattents. (5) "Retail Establishment" means any establishment which primarily sells goods to the general public. (6) "Public Service Area" means any area, other then an administrative area, to which the general public routinely has access for municipal services and which is designated a public service are: in a written policy prepared In compliance with this Article. Sec. I3-11. Smoking Prchibited in Certain Public Areas. (a) A person commits an offense If he smokes or possesses a burnin tobacco, weed or other plant product in any of the following indoor or enclosed areas: (1) an elevator used by the public; (2) a hospital or nursing home corridor providing direct access to patients, rooms; (3) any conference room, meeting room, or public service area of any facility owned, operated, or managed by the city; but does not include the Civic Center, the Visual Arts Center nor the Center for Performing Arts; (4) an retai ncluding. but establishment i not s limited serving h department public, grocery store, or drug store; (4) An area marked with a no smoking. sign in accordalce with subsection (b) of this section by the owner or person in control of a hospital, nursing home, or retail establishment serving the general public; or (6) any facility of a publL primary or secondary school; or an enclosed theater, movie house, library, or museum. (b) The owner or person in control of an establishment in which smoking is prohibited by subsection (a) of this section or at the establishment. coThelcuownersign person min control entrance of the establishment in which smoking is prohibited in a specified area shall post a conspicuous sign at the entrance to the area, the Ordinance," ;mCity of Denton other language that clearly prohibits smoking. (c) Every hospital shall: (1) allow all patients, prior to elective admission, to choose to be in a no smoking patient room; and (2) require that employees or visitors obtain express approval from all patients in a patient room prior to smoking. owner ol subsection (&)(a) ro in or (a)(8} of ths Section PAGE 2 M t a 98 c << AgerfRa No Ageadalteo Rota mmaaayt ldesigonasate, ' •norawraiaa,tinginclrooudisang, but o s as notsmokn liimitedaraato{ p lobrovbidea n rog ~ that designated smo'cing area may not lncludet (1) the entire establishment; (2) cashier areas or over the counter sales areas; or and (3) the viewing area of any theater or movie house. (e) it is a defense to prosecution under this section if the perecn was smoking in a location that wasl (1) a deli noted smoking area of a facility or establls~ment described in subsection (a)(4) or (a) (6) of this section which is posted as a smoking area with appropriate signs; (2) an administrative area or office of an establishment described in subsection (a)(4) or (a)(6) of this section; (3) a retail establishment serving the general public with lass than 500 square feet of a public pp showroom duty, unlesssposted ashavdesi anotedononemoking area in accordance with subsection (a)(5) of this section; or (4) a retail 411 rablishmant which is primarily engaged in the sale of tobacco, tobacco products or smoking implements. (f) The owner or person in control of on establishment exempted from designating nonsmoking areas by paragraph (e) of this section who chooses not to designate any such areas shall poet a conspicuous ai n near the main entrance to the establish- Ar sewN ttAvailable" orielailaritla guageutoouin"dicate "Nonsmoking nonsmoking areas are provided. Sec. 13.42. Written Policy Required, The owner or person in control of any facilityy or area desljnoted as a no smoking area in section 13-42 (a)`3) or (4) of this Article shallr (a) have and implement a written policy on smoking which conforms to this Article; and (b) make the policy available for inspection by the Director. Sec. 13.43. Food Establishments. areas @halloprovide blishent separate indoorhat ane.loiadrdiningsareas for smoking and nonsmoking patrons. (b) A nonsmoking area muse: (1) be s• arated, where feasible, from smoking areas by a minimum of four feet of contiguous floor apace; PACE 3 LM VendaNo 9 9 Agerd ilem Dale . t Ict~S air from (2) be ventilated, not draw* into or acrree the aoosaoking areawhere feasible, and situated so that the smoking area is ] (3) be clearly designated by approEriate it am visible to patrons within the dinin area indicatitg that the area is designated nonamoking; and (4) have ash trays or other suitable containers for extinguishing amoking materials at the perimeter of the nonsmoking area. (c) Each food eetabliahmant which hem a dining area shalli (1) have and implement a written policy on saoktng which conforms to this Article; (2) m Director; ake the andlicy available for inspection by the (3) have.signs at the establishment's entrance indicating that nonsmoking seating is available, reas of this(sectionitonwhich patronss hive food gneralsec osse including, but not limited to, food order aress, food service areas, restrooms, and cashier areas, shall be designated as nonsmoking areas, It is & defense to prosecution under this section that the ood establishment !st (1) arrangeme tstfor log s hanh50 patrons; or °r seating (2) an establishment in which more than 70 percent of its annual gross sales is from the sale of alcoholic baveragesj or (3) a physicallqq separated bar area of a food establish. ment otherwise regulated. owner exemptedT from deal notingrnoon in nsmoking mom b an graabllahme f tits section who chooses not to designate any suchrar as(shall post a conspicuous st``n near the main entrance to the establish- ment with the words "Smoking Permitted Throughout" or "Nonsmoking Areas Not Available" or similar language to indicate that no nonsmoking areas are provided. Sec, 13-44. Smoking in food Establishments. A person commits an offense if he smokes or possesses a burn- satibllshmen~t doe!instadtas noose kingodut! is an area of it food (Sec. 13-pp 45. Penalties. 13.4;1 oAny 1 &43oofvthistAreicla tou on-conviction 1(l)' 13.41(;), by s fine of not lesm than fifty Dollars ($$0.00; nor more than five Hundred Dollars ($500.00). PAGE 4 t 10 0 JcBadaNa q r 9C-A 3/ AgeDdaltenl Nis , Article,AUponeConviction,i is suniishablo- blyea tine Sofenot leis than Twenty•flve Dollars (W-00) nor more than Two Hundred Dollars (200.00). SECTION II. That this ordinance does not require the owner, operator, mangler or any employyyee of an establishment to report a sectionon13 11(s)teor a13.1/tot Aaainst rticle IV, individual ISiotatthe Denton City Code as amended. Complaints against Individuals City/CountytHealtho Depparetmant to rclnvestigation end mreterral,tif warranted, to the UPC* of thj City Attorney for prosecution. SECTION III, That If any section, subsection, pare rsph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdictiopn$ such holding shall not affect the validity of the theaCity of o0ret Ions of Taxes,s hereby ordinance, declares and it h would y haveu enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION IV. That this ordinance shall become effective June 1, 1916, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to he published twice in the Denton Records Chronicle, the official newsjspor of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the date of its passage. ~~ff PASSED AND APPROVED this the L-._ day of ' 1916. #CIO'F TON, TEXAS ATTESTi Y OF STON,~TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOViTCH, CITY ATTORNEY CITY of DENTON, TEXAS BY3 PACE S CITY COUNCIL l 4~ O''01~r 4 A . o ~pend~No. 4peedalt CITY COUNCIL RFipOAT RORM~+ '~Re / TOE Mayor and Members of the City Council rb PROMI Lloyd V, Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTS Abandonment of cul-de-sac Goldfield Addition REC4MMI92ATIM Approve ordinan:e to abandon the cul-de-sac and retain utility easement SUMMARYt Alan and Shirley (7oldfield platted this property in May 1992. This platting was required in order to most the city's subdivision regulations so they could have a second residential structure built on the 6.427 acre tract. BACKGROUND The 6.427 acre tract was subdivided into two lots to the existing agriculture coning. At this time, Mr. 6 Mrs. Goldfield wish to construct a security fence with a gate. Several alternates were explored with the final determination being to abandon the existing cul-de-dac and changi the toning to Planned Development (PD). In order for the property to be in compliance with the city's subdivision regulations, the PO must be approved subject to this abandonment approval. If the zoning is not approved, this cul-de-sac cannot be abandoned. This would create two lots without the required 30' frontage on a public street. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMZNTb_QR GROUPS 11PFECTED1 Street Division will not be required to maintain cul-de-sac, All utilities will have access to maintain their facilities. PISCAL IMMU City to be compensated fair market value as determined by an independent appraiser. No maintenance cost of the cul-de-sac will be incurred by the city. Land will be added back to the taxable property roll, RESPE LY SUBMITT o Arre %11re d by e City Manager c neon Su?erv or O. Engineering Techs/ROW Approvede r rc D *to of Enginearing 6 Transportation AEX00168 9 12 f vends Ma 3 ~ - C lgeodafte r hte - CITY O/ DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM DATEt June 25, 1993 TOi Lloyd Harrell, City Manager Pk rROMI Roger N. Wilkinson, Supervisor of Engineering Techs/ROW SUBJECTi Cul-de-sac abandonment - A. Goldfield Addition An abandonment 1993. They are requesting thel cul-de-sac dedicated by the A rGoldfieldnaddition plat be abandoned. It is their wish to install a security gate at this entrance to the property. They considered the building line met back requirements requiring them to fence around the cul do sac unfeasible. Therefore, they wish to install a gate across the entrance to the cul de sac once it is abandoned. The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered this matter at their May 27, 1993 meeting g. A recommendation to allow the cul de sac to be abandoned with the from Commission (P &t2)ico sidered this r qu sta ateitsnJune h23,,11993nmeetingnand recommended approval. Tommy Marshall and Associates was hired by the Goldfields, or by their representatives, to prepare an independent appraisal for this abandonment request. Bill Col,aaan, Tommy Marshall, and I met May 27, 1993 to discuss this to a agriculturet(A) ezoninge and a tabli hm the value as e of the trac June 8t 1993. Its current Mr. Marshall submitted this appraisal to me June 22, 1993. In his opinion, the land is valued at $10,300.00. This dollar amount is the difference between the before value $81,000.00 (prior to cul-de-sac construction) and after value, $91,300 (cul-de-sac in place). Mr. Bill Coleman has indicated he spoke with Mr. Goldfield who is agreeable to pay this amount at this time, to be on the July 6, 1993 council agenda. This abandonment has been handled in a timely manner, just over a month (May 27th until June 30th). It has been to D.R.C. (who has made a positive recommendation) Plannin and toning, (who also makes a positive recommendation) and an independent appraisal has been prepared which established a "market value". This abandonment request is scheduled for the next City Council meeting (July 61 1993) for their consideration. I have reviewed Mr. Marshall's written appraisal report. He utilized the criteria agreed upon between Bill Coleman, Tommy Marshall, and myself. Mr. Marshall has to~ prepared an unbiased appraisal which reflects his opinion as to the market value the land to be abandoned. y J oor AEE00260 neon 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 ~endaNo,~ 3-._~~C Minutes Agenda ltem Planning and Zoning Oate June 231 1993 Page 6 Ms. Flemming asked if there would be landscaping. Mr. Johnson said there are a lot of trees and shrubs now. After the units are built, we can go in and check to see if additional landscaping is needed. Public hearing was close.l IN FAVOR: None IN OPPOSITION: None Mr. Glasscock recommended approval of 2-93-012, Mr. Cochran seconded with staff conditions. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). VI. Consider the preliminary plat of Hunters Ridge Addition, the 16.205 acre site is located a at the northwest Porner of Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley Lane. STAFF REPORT: Staff report was given by Owen Yost. Mr. Yost said the proposal was for the preliminary plat of lot 1-21 Block At and Lot 1, Block B of Hunters Ridge Addition. The current zoning is Planned Development 19. The applicant has asked for rezoning to single family 16, and a variance for a curb cut. The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission, on May 17, 1993 granted a variance to the applicant, approving the curb cut location shown on the preliminary plat accessing Lillian Millee from Lot 1, Block B. Utilities are available or planned for. Not shown is an a ft. easement. The plat conforms to the Subdivision and Land Development Regulationst Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. RECOMMENDATIONI The Development Review Committee recommends approval, conditioned on the satisfactory revision of the document reflecting the proposed land use. Mr. Cochran wanted to be reassured there would be sidewalks along Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller and the internal streets would have sidewalks on both sides. Mr. Yost said yes, approximately 4300 feet of concrete sidewalk would be installed. Mr. Cochran moved approval of the preliminary plat of Hunters Ridge Addition as recommended by staff. Mr. Cooper seconded the motion, the vote carried unanimously (6-0). VII4 Consider abandoning a portion of Southmont Drive, being the cul-de-sac at the eastern most end of Southmont. r i ~ rdlNo Cf 3'6 C Agwalt Minutes ~tf C Planning and Zoning t CCi June 23, 1993 Page 7 STAFF REPORT: Staff Report was given by David Salmon. Mr. Salmon reportod that the owners of the prc-ierty, Alan and Shirley Goldfield have requested ;:hat the city abandon the cul de sac that was dedicated by the A. Goldfiold Addition plat. The Goldfields wish to install a security gate entrance to their property, they consider fencing around ::he cul de sac unfeasible. Therefore, they wish to install v rjate across the entrance to the cut de sac. Under the current ordinances, the only way to do this is to apply for Planned Development zoning, if granted will allow them to have access off a private street. The abandonment was presented to the Development Review Committee at the May 27, 1993 xPeting. It's members recommended approval with the retentio.; of a utility easement. At the last meeting the Commission recommended Planned Development zoning and a gate across the cul de sac. In order for that to happen the cul de sac will have to be abandoned. Mr. Cochran moved to recommend abandonment of the cul de sac on Southmont Drive. fir. Willis seconded, and the motion carried unanimously (6-0). VIII. Hold a public hearing and consider an ordinance adding section 35-158 of the Zoning ordinance, providing for minor amendments to Planned Development detailed plans to be approved by the Executive Director of Planning and Development. STAFF REPORT: Staff report was given by Frank Robbins. Mr. Robbins explained that the amendment would allow the Executive Director of Planning and Development to approve "minor amendments" to approve PD detailed plans within the specified parameters spelled out in the ordinance. The amendment would be consistent with the existing minor amendment provision applicable to specific use permit site plans. The current PD article allows for minor amendments only for "errors or omissions. The amendment was recommended by the Zoning Ordinance Task force, and is a consequence of the complaining by developers about small items like moving a dumpster or the ordin nceadoesmedian not somesome paramet parameters. The landscaping amendment change. ould not Change the number of units, the number of stories, or be more detailed than the sup which allows for the minor amendment to be approved by staff. However, any degree of staff discretion in such legislative, matters should be carefully considered. There are some legal risks associated with this amendment. A Planned Development District is an ordinance in its own right, just like the city's sidewalk ordinance. Administrators , as a general rule, are not authorized by law to waive or vary the w \ord\goldaban.o ApendaNa, ~ Ae e NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ABANDONING AND VACATING THAT CERTAIN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 0.185 ACRE OF LAND LYING IN THE C. POULLALIER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1006, CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF A TRACT OF LAND FROM ROBERT A. NICHOLS, ET AL TO ALAN GOLDFIELD, ET UX, RECORDED IN VOLUME 29081 PAGE 534 OF THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; RESERVING A UTILITY EAS ~2tENT THEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I WHEREAS, the City has received a request for abandonment of a certain street right-of-way easement from Alan Goldfield, at ux, owners of certain property affected by said right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Denton has determined that the right-of-way being vacated is no longer needed for street usage; and WHEREAS, the fair market value of the street right-of-way has been determined and received as required by Tex. Loc. Gov't Code Ann. 5 272.001 (Vernon 1988) and Denton, Texas, Code ch. 2 art. IV. (1991); NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: gECTION I. That the street right-of-way easement on 0.185 acre of land lying in the C. Poullaiier Survey, Abstract Number 1006, City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, described in attached Exhibit "A" and being a part of the tract described in instruments recorded in Volume 2908, Page 534 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas, is permanently vacated and extinguished as street right-of-way for public use; provided, however, that there is here- by expressly reserved and excepted from vacation and abandonment for the property so described, a public utility easement for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, repairing, and maintaining underground utility and drainage lines and facilities therein. SECTION 11, That by operation of law, the City of Denton's property interest in the street right-of-way herein abandoned and vacated shall revert to the abutting property owner, whether one or more, and the City of Denton hereby releases all claims to the use of the property for public street usage. SECTION iir. That this ordinance shall become effective immedi- ately upon its passage and approval. a ApeaoaNO, ' AQentlali ~ Date . PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTI JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BYt APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY A'.^TORNEY BY I Page 2 f f~ F F .s r 3 it k I Ha. DATE I Ju*Aal1E I! V CITY COUNCIL REPORT /Ci~ ry TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM= Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manage- SUBJECT: Z-93-016, Goldfield Rezoning RECOMMENDATIONt The Planning and Zoning Commiesitn recommended approval with a 5-1 vote at the June 9, 1993. SUMMARY i Request to rezone a 6,427 acre tract from the Agricultural Zoning district to the Planned Development district and approval of a Detailed Plan on pt.: 4rty located wevt of the intersection of Pennsylvania Drive and nouthmont Drive anr3 immediately south of St. Marks Catholic church for the purpose of two (2) one family detached residential dwelliog units, agricultural uses, and a private cul de sac. DAM= Mt The applicant requested and Council approved on June 15, 1993 that this item be postponed until the Council's meeting of July 6, 19931 in order to consider the street abandonment on the aame agenda. See P&Z Report. PROGRAMS DEVARTMENT&-OR GROUPS AFEECTEDt Applicant. Building Inspections. Engii.eering. Fire Department. Police Department. Planning and Development. FISCAL IMPACT; N/A / Respe fully submi tads Llo d V. Harrell City Manager i~ agenda Mo ~ ~ ~ ~L AgendaIte , Prepared by. Ia)jY'all 1 rank H, Robbin AICP Executive Director Planning and Development WOW Agenda No Agenda Item `4 L /s PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT Too Mayor and Members of the City Council Case No.1 2-93-016 Meeting Dates 07/06/93 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants Alan and Shirley Goldfield 3101 Carmel Denton, TX 76205 Current owners Same. Requested Actions Rezone a 6.427 acre tract of land from Agricultural district to Planned Development district and approval of a detailed plan for the purpose of two (2) one family detached residential dwelling units and agricultural uses. Location and Bizet 6.427 acres located went of the intersection of Pennsylvania Drive and Southmont Drive, and immediately south of St. Marks Catholic Church. Surrounding Land Use and Zonings North - Agricultural district/St. Marks Catholic Church South - Agricultural district/Residential East - SF-16 district/Residential. West - P.Iricultural district/Vacant and Residential Denton Development Plano Low Intensity Area, I Agenda N09 AgenddIt() = Case No. Z-93-016 ate June 151 1993 Page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportations 1. Sidewalks will not be required as the remainder of Southmont Subdivision was not required to install sidewalks. 2. The cul-de-sac, as shown on the Detailed Plan is generally acceptable; if additional construction is desir^_d at a later date, the cul-de-sac will have to be opened for public access. Utilities; Waters There is a six (6) inch water line located on Southmont Drive in front of the property. Sewers An eight (8) inch sanitary sewer is located on Southmont Drive in front of the property. Fires There is a fire hydrant on Pennsylvania and on , Southmont Drive as well Southmont and Destin Drives) therefore, no additional hydrants are required. The gate, as shown on the detailed plan, should have a system so as to provide emergency and service vehicle access to the site. The gravel drive is an all-weathered surface, approved by the fire department. Drainages No public drainage improvements will be required as this development will have an insignificant impact on the drainage in this area. HISTORY On January 8, 1992, the Planning and Zoning commission held a public hearing on 2-91-023. There was considerable neighborhood opposition to this request; therefore, the Planning and Zoning ~gentlaNo C1~~~ AgentlaI fi5'f/ Case No. 2-93-016 fate rt T June 15, 1993 Page 3 HISTORY, Continued Commission moved to continue this public hearing on January 22, 1992 in order to have the applicant meet with the neighbors. On January 22, 1992, the P&Z tabled the request once again due to neighborhood opposition. On February 6, 1992, the representative for the applicant requested a withdrawal of the petition. on June 9, 1993, the Planning and Zoning Commission heard Case No. 2-93-016 and recommended approval with a 5-1 vote. ANALYSIS This site is located in a low intensity area which, according to , the Denton Development Plan, is primarily for residential protection and preservation. The applicant has requested the property be rezoned to Planned Development because they would like to maintain a private road with a security gate across the frontage. According to the Subdivision Regulations, private streets are allowed only in Planned Developments. The detailed plan reflects two one family dwelling detached units on a 6.427 acre tract. It does not appear as though any policies of the Denton Development Plan would be violated. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning commission recommends approval of Z-93-016 with the following conditionss 1. The City council approves the request for abandonment of right- of-way (cul de sao)1 and, pe a:. y' Neil d4Na AAeadalle ~ l Case No. Z-93-016 Date l June 45, 1993 Page b o- ~S U RECOMMENDATION, continued 2. The owner executes an indemnification agreement holding the City harmless from injuries arising from the lacked gate in a form agreeable to the Executive Director of Planning and Development and City Attorney. 3. The security gate not be able to be mechanically opened or closed against an obstruction, as approved by the building official and fire chief. ALTERNATIV88 1. Approve petition 2. Approve petition with additional conditions 3. Deny petition 4. Postpone consideration ATTACBMENTB 1. Location Map 2. Proposed Detailed Plan Reduction 3. Minutes of PH, June 9, 1993. A11M00311 5 i bQendaNo c~,,I~~l~~ Southmont Drive ATTACHMENT 1 Ageadaltertt~.~ - ~ Date. NORTH w u 1116 $OUTN NT 0 MO 1OITO IIIOOT IIIO a ~ ~ r ~d lll~~~ l+'!! • A SIZE 1 0 0 r IIYAM ti OATS; 107/01 SCALE; NONE T[AAt1 LAME f.E. PEACOC9 SURVEY C. POLUAVER SURKY A-1564 I A-1006 ~~^Tr I I ,I GCTLL hW10D}[S I LIfl M0c11AL CUIT 10 C1MOLq t//A. II UfI ❑U IIMI 1 4 C" MVP M 0 1 K1161 i t w ~'T 1 ~ [HPAMAO1wtl t1, 1 F 1,1ri W L'!lUILL I \ t I/'1 b 1114 &M." I oil Itw[ F IIr1~+ F_I~ w 5 YDIUUW VIII WH . I 11-. n.. Yf MARY IIIUw ILf"4411111 1001 ha. III 11 A"%wbF do y MI s W F~ I.LLIw ItlACK9 OL1/ at " It ANY ""a I a .1101 I1w {e 1 110//1 O r4 1 11TH VI 9.IN 11,11 ~1} ~IM a WMMY .[IWI: 40 0, MIYY pr.w1 r1.u awl WMMIII MIINI I. 111110tVYJI[ I I a f I I ] C • MI... wr v ' rran[/ Vr. NMO A I WOOL rAnp1111rIt1. I VI[[I 1,r t~~ 1 r/r V I r p 01V11FW..IFI MOO, I rw.14 urt rYvMrYI I1r1 Ir wHrrl l.rl Mr• lrrlr 111r II 1 II II I ♦)M I1, S .Ir Y4Y114 1gwrxl", lMlYlby LI / r / Ci ~D1 / reH lWi^/I .a 1✓IYrwblliiDl Y.u YR 11 i ~ 'l 'i,• i, 1~N. rnr rrdwrlrrwr rnlrl al wJr ~ 1 / ~ M MW • 1/tt I ^Y~ 11 r MrWM1W M~-~ 1 t 1 1 r1 b 1 MT t tIM11q p r r 1 c I town A n ~ i 1 wr r~ r0t01rA YIU 1 ~ ~ 1 J I~ 1 o"If ~ r' fr 111111 y r ~ Iti r 51 1 ~r..r~ tJ 1*010,10dod 31 FPO Q\ ~ 11 ~1~i 4 Jr i' I ~r I $uBw 1 4ft 11111[:`_ A.101110101,[1 ItLOI[LI TN M[M11L t _....r1 t t1,' 11LM1[u1 ON R It I P'_ "moot M 11A RAM o 4 O[TAIL LA.! I~DUMU ADM C POIAA AL= hf, A-*" em a t"m w MWOK Tow W ~ } 1 rV W Iri t 0[TM /J X'~I 1,110 1 of 00 1 111 Iw rr11 M01pL 8111 f1Nt 1f-11L1M e ~gerdaNo. ATTACHMENT 3 aperd It S ~ lr minutes We 21f Planning b Zoning Commission IY/S June 9, 1993 Page 6 In opposition: none The public hc,aring was closed. Dr. Huey moved to recommend approval of case 2-93-010 as recommended by staff. Mr. Glasscock seconded and the motion carried unanimously (6-0) V. Hold a public hearing and consider the rezoning of a 6.427 acre tract from the Agricultural district to the Planned Development district with a detailed plan on the property located west of the intersection of Pennsylvania Drive and Southmont Drive, immediately south of St. Marks Catholic Church for the purpose of two (2) one-family detached residential dwelling units, agricultural uses and a private cul de sac. Chairman Engelbrecht opened the public hearing. An addendum to the staff roport was passed out to the commissioners. STAFF REPORT; Report by Frank Robbins Mr. Robbins said that the addendum was for clarification. He reported the proposal was for a rezoning from A to PD to allow for a private street. Private streets are only allowed in Planned Development districts. The PD would restrict the PD by zoning it for only two structures. The conditions that are recommended to this case are as follows: 1. A security gate would be installed out of metal railings at the point Southmont Drive dead ends into this district shall not be allowed or permitted unless the City Council approves the request for the abandonment of the cul-de-sac that was reflected in Exhibit "A". 2. The security gate referenced above shall not be permitted or allowed unless a covenant running with the land is executed by the owners of the subject property and filed of record which releases, indemnifies, defends and holds harmless the City of Denton from any liabilities, maintenance, use or nonuse of the security gate and fire lane. This covenant shall be in a form that is agreeable to the Executive Director of Planning and Development and the City Attorney. 3. The Fire chief is authorized to require a key lock box to be installed in an accessible location in close proximity to the security gate to provide Fire and Police Safety Personnel off- 0 Agenda No AOeo lle~.~ _ Minutes Dale` Planning 6 Zoning commission /C June 9, 1993 Page 7 a key to a31ow access to the addition in case of a public health or safety emergency. The key lock box shall be of a type approved by the Fire Chief. 4. The fire lane to provide access to the two dwelling units must be an all-weather surface approved by the Fire Department. Mr. Engelbrecht asked about the notification to the property owners. Mr. Robbins said there were 22 notices mailed and 3 reply forms were received, 1 in opposition and 2 in favor. Petitioner= Bill Coleman, Coleman and Associates Surveying, 1421 N. Elm, Denton, Texas. He explained the purpose of the security gate was the condition the land was in when Goldfield planned to build. The concept for a PD and private Street came about from conversations with the architect and the city, because it is still not feasible for a fence around the property because of the cul-de-sac. It is not very attractive and they would like to fix it up. The only way to accomplish this would be to replace the gate around the cul de sac. That would depend on the council abandoning the cul de sac. The Goldfields have no problem with the conditions or allowing emergency access to the property. They feel it would improve the neighborhood. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the gate would be electronic or remote controlled, Mr. Coleman said yes the gate would be electronic. Dr. Huey asked is there would be a danger to children from an electronically operated gate. One of the replies addressed that issue. Coleman said he had not seen the letter, but it would open to the inside and it should have a safety override so it would stop if it met any resistance or blockage. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if there were city regulations for electronic gates. Mr. Robbins said no, he did not know of any. In favors none 'a Agent No q AgonCalte Minutes Cite ,-Cl `j Planning d Zoning Commission June 9, 1993 Page 8 In opposition. Colleen Clower, 3008 Pennsylvania Court. Ms. Clower said she had three legally blind children and the gate was a great concern. She moved into the area bece-lse of the cul-de- sac. She said they do have enough vision to get to where they had to be, but not to move quickly out of the way. Now they do not have to worry about the gate opening on them. Why can't they put up a fence or a locked gate. I do not see why they have to have an electronic gate. When the button is pushed to opened the gate you will not be able to see the other side. Children will be hurt. There are children that have been killed by garage door openers. She said she was friends with the Goldfields and that 6 1/2 acres should be more than enough room for privacy. She said she had a set of twins that were 8 years old and grandchildren visit the area. An electronic gate is dangerous. There are zero lot lines and there is not a lot of room to spare. Children are curious and they will try to see if they can make it move. If the Goldfields want beauty why not put up a fence or a locked gate not an electronic metal one. She said she bought her lot in the area because of the safety of her children and with the gate that safety would be compromised. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if Ms. Clower knew that the gate would open into the Goldfield property. Ms. Clower said she was a teacher and a child would be attracted to the gate and someone would get hurt. Ms. Lou Nelson, 2901 Carmel. Ms. Nelson said after that young mothers plea about her children, what she felt did not matter. She said she wanted to go on record as opposed. Mr. Coleman said he understood the concern we all have for the safety of our children. The reason they are coming back to put the gate in is they could not put up a fence without setbacks which would fence off well over an acre of their land. The Goldfields would do everything in their ability to assure the safety factors of the gate. One of the reasons they are trying to get the gate is to stop traffic driving up into their property to look. They want to stop the traffic. This will stop the traffic because there would be no more traffic going in to that street. Dr. Huey asked for clarification on the nature of the gate. Would it be permanently locked. Mr. Coleman said no it would be an electronic security gate. It would not be locked permanently. t Agenda Na r Minutes Agerdallem Planning Zoning CommissionJune 9, 1993 Page 9 Mr. Glasscock stated there are a lot of gates in town now. They are around yards and pools and storage buildings. He said he knew his neighbors had one, especially around their pools. He asked if the gates have safety requirements. Mr. Bucek said there might be a way to make sure that the police and the fire chief make sure that the gate met some type of safety requirements. It would have to be installed so that it would be safe, if Mr. Coleman agrees. Mr. Cooper asked the size of the gate and if there were requirements that it be electronically operated but with a manual override. Ms. Clower said the gate would be the size of two lanes. It would be the size of the road. Mr. Coleman said it would be the main egress of tha property. Mr. Bucek said it was not just to keep people out but to protect their property and to keep their dogs in, Dr. Huey asked about a fence and the gate being impractical. Why would you build a gate if there is no fence. Mr. Coleman said there was a fence. He was speaking about the gate at the cul-de-sac. It would have to be below 42 inches and would not keep a dog in or a child out. Mr. Engelbrecht said if there is a fence would there not still be a gate. Mr. Coleman said yes, there would have to be an entrance gate in the fence. That was the entryway to the property. The public hearing was closed. Bucek said the concern of the city was not to have a military operation. The city says if there is a fence in the front it could only be 42 inches high, unless you can show a hardship or come in with a planned development or ask for a variance. There would be a problem with the gate no matter where you put it. Ms. Flemming asked how the gate would be an improvement to the property. Mr. Robbins said that it would have to be added and it would F Y i C r. ~gen0a No ~ J ~ ~f. Data C Minutes Planning & Zoning Commission 4 4 June 9, 1993 Page 10 cost money, so it would be an improvement. Mr. Engelbrecht stated that if there was a require.nent added to the condition, requiring a sensitivity device on the gate he failed to see a safety problem to children. There are electronic door closures all over town, There has not to his knowledge been a problem with the doors in the City. The doors have been quiet safe. Mr. Cooper asked if there are any controls for security and safety features that could be checked with the building inspector or someone to make sure they would be safe and operate properly. Mr. Engelbrecht said the Commission could make it a condition since it was for a planned development:. Mr. Robbins said there are manufacturers specifications and it could be permitted and the condition checked. Mr. Engelbrecht moved to recommend with conditions the rezoning of a 6.427 acre tract from the Agricultural district to the Planned Development district with a detailed plan on the property located west of the intersection of Pennsylvania Drive and Southmont Drive, immediately south of st. Marks Catholic Church for the purpose of two (2) one-family detached residential dwelling units, agricultural uses and a private cul do sac as outlined by staff and in addition in #1 and added item that a sensor device be a part of the gate. Mr. Cooper seconded. Mr. Robbins said what was really wanted was a safety feature saying that it would not close if it was obstructed with something or by something. The vote was (5-1) Dr. Huey voted in opposition. V7, Mr. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, Denton, Texas. Mr. Harrell reported that he wanted to give a brief overview of the "Visions" project so the Commission would have full knowledge. He said that during the past year, several organizations perceived a need to form a consensus about what type of community Denton should become and unite to achieve that vision rather than letting chance dictate the future. That desire led to the design of a visioning project which has been titled "A Vision for Denton - the 21st Century". As contemplated, the effort will be sponsored and lead by seven institutions which have their own budget and authority r; k. 4 r: ei\ord\9o1dfi1d.ord ,gendaNo Agendait , Date /`/cn~ /S ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 6.427 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF PENNSYLVANIA DRIVE A')D SOUTHMONT DRIVE, AND IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF ST. MARKIS CATHOLIC CHURCH] PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF) AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Alan and Shirley Goldfield have applied for a change in zoning for 6.427 acres of land from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development (PD) Zoning District Classification and Use Designa- tion: and WHEREAS, on June 9, 19931 the Planning and Zoning Commission re.ommended approval of the requested change in zoning) and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the change in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan) NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 6.42'o acres of land comprising Lots 1 and 2, Block A, A. Goldfield Addition is changed from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development (PD) Zoning District Classification and Use Designation under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the city of Denton, Texas. SECTION II,, That the Detailed Plan identified as Exhibit "A" and attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all pur- poses, providing for this PD District to be used for two single family residential dwelling units and agricultural uses, is hereby approved. SECTION III. That the district shall be subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1. That the security gate to be installed at the point South- mont Drive deadends into this district shall not be per- mitted or allowed unless the cul-de-sac reflected in Exhibit "A" is abandoned by the City Council as requested by Appli- cants. 2. The security gate shall be of a type which cannot mechani- cally open or close against an obstruction or person and shall otherwise be in compliance with the regulations of the City's Building and Fire codes. 3. That the security gate referenced above shall not be permit- ted or allowed unless a covenant running with the land is executed by the owners of the Nubject property and filed of i t i oendaNo ()27 ls Ayendalte C Cate record which releases, indemnifies, defends and holds harm- less the City of Denton from any liabilities or damages that use or may arise by reason of 'the sandlfirenglane. maint This covenant nonuse of the security gate shall be in a form lanning and Development agreeable and the City EAttorney, Director of P 4. The Police chief or Fire Chief is authorized to require an access system to be installed in an accessible location in close proximity to tho security gate to provide cause and Police Safety Personnel access to the propeY of a public health or safet emerenc. The by the Police or Fire Chiefs requiring same. a type app 5. The fire lane providing access to the two dwelling units byof the materials that provide an all-weather must be constructed surface approved SFCWrION IV That the City's official zoning map is amended to show the change in zoning district classification. That any person violating any provision' of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. AFCTION VI. That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be the published twice eDenton ton, RT Texas, Cwithinlton (o10)fficial days ofethe paper of the City y of Denton, date of its passage. , 1993. PASSED AND APPROVED this the - day of _ BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTt JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY$ APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BYt PAGE 2 CITY COUNCIL < ~f c ~ s tiroh ~~4 O OOpa • ~ t k ApeMa1 DATE: July 6, l7Vj___ G t ~ ?~f CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Z-93-010, Hunter's Ridge RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval 6-0. SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting a rezoning from Planned Development district No. 19, to 16.2 acrus located at the northwest corner of Lillian Miller and Teasley Lane to SF-161 136 acres located on the east side of Lillian Miller, north of Sundown Ranch and north of the "T" intersection of Lillian Miller and Teasley to SF-161 and 4.7 acres located on the east side of the "T" Intersection of Lillian Miller and Teasley to Office district with conditions. BACKGROUND: See P&Z report, PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Planning and Development. Building Inspections. Code Enforcement. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A Reapectfu y submitted: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager PAGE 1 i i i i q _(jL 4genoa No Ageod~lt torte Prepared by: 3 L, 17141a k Ka n K. Mitchell Urban Planner Approved: rank H. Robbins AICP Executive Director Planning and Development A%%06304 PACE 2 +geadaNo. ~ AgendaI e Oele - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT ~^Lf Tos Mayor and Members of the City Council Case Noel Z-93-010 Meeting Datet July 6, 1993 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicants Hersman Development/Lybert Properties Route 1, Cox 29H Argyle, TX 76266 (Jake Hersman, DVM/Katherine Lybert) Current Owners same Requested Action, Location and Sisal Request rezonings from Planned Development District No. 19 tot West side of Lillian Miller north of Teasley - a 16.2 acre tract: SF-16. i On east side of Lillian Miller and Teasley, north and south of the "T" intersection - 4.706 acres to Office district with conditions, 136 acres to SF-16. a surrounding Land Use and Zonings North - PD-871 SF-30 (planned development for single family detached). South - Sundown Ranch (Agriculturally z(,ned with a Specific Use Permit approved for a horse training facility) PD16. East - SF-10 (Southridge East)t Agricultural and PD20 (fire station, library and retail center). West - PD-87 (approved for Single family residential). a ~C )Oema No Agevaltem 4ate t Case No. Z-93-010 3(1 July 6, 1993 II Page 2 GENERAL INFORMATION, Continued Denton Development Plan: Low Intensity Area. Teasley Lane/Lillian Miller Special Policy Area. SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation • No residential drives will be permitted on Teasley Lane or Lillian Miller. • Five (5) feet of additional right-of-way is required on Teasley bane with an additional ten (10) feet for a distance of 150 feet back from Lillian Miller. Right-of-way on Lillian Miller is acceptable. • A 20 toot utility easement is needed along Teasley Lane. Turn lanes will require an 80 foot stacking with a 50 foot transition. The original application was requesting , rezoning for office district on 3.490 acres located at the northwest corner of Lillian Miller and Teasley Lane. They requested a variance for drive approach location on Lillian Miller, The drive approach proposed for the office tract, in order to meet corner clearance standards is required to be 250 feet however, on May 170 1993, the Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission granted a 50 foot variance on this tract for a shared access to this tract. The rezoning application has since been amended for single family 16, however, the variance is still in affect. Sidewalks are required along all street frontagos. a ~gen4a No Cj ~ AgWa Item Case No. Z-93-010 Date - J'uly 6, 1993 C-j,~ Page 3 SPECIAL INFORMATION, continued utilities; Water, The city will be extending a 16-inch waterline along the southern boundary of the property. The developer will be required to extend an 8-inch waterline along Lillian Miller and a 6-inch line within the subdivision. Sewers, There is an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line north of the property and an 18-inch line east of the intersection of Lillian Miller and Teasley. Sewer extension will be required. The minimum size and slope is 8 inches at 33%. Fire: Fire hydrants are required every 600 feet in residential areas and every 300 feet in nonresidential areas. Electric: Street lighting on new public roads is paid for by the developer. The estimated number of lights is six (6), at a cost of $1,000 each. Drainage: A preliminary drainage study is required. • P Lillian Miller. Drainage from this lat documents should show existing drainage facilities on collected in inlets and put directly into btheiLillian Miller system. HISTORY On September 4, 1984, the City Council approved the rezoning of this tract from the Single family 10 district to the Planned Development district and approved a concept plan for a mixed use development consisting of: Single family (10,000 sf. lots) Single family (71000 sf. lots) Cluster housing @ 8 units/acre igenOaNU vagen0a m 7 [ /8 Case No. Z-93-010 ble r July 6, 199' Page 4 HISTORY, continued cluster housing @ 11 units/acre Multi-Family (390 units) General Retail, Office, Park, a Community facility On August 19, 1986, the Council approved an amendment to this PD's concept plan by increasing the number of single family seven lots. 15 acres from cluster housing (120 units) to single family (7,000 sf.) 30.39 acres from single family (10,000 sf.) to single family (7,000 sf.) 28.53 acres cluster housing (314 units) to cluster housing (339 units) I It should be noted that there is some history to PD19 concerning an agreement between Robert Wachter (original applicant) and Jerry Cott (owner of the south) regarding the erection of an eight (8) foot high masonry wall along the entire southern boundary of the site. As the verbatim transcript of the City Council meeting dated August 19, 1986 reflects, the screening issue would be addressed during the detailed plan stage of PD19. This request is for zoning to SF-16 and conditioned office. One condition in the proposed Office conditioned district calls for a bufferyard between it and the northern and eastern boundary. The screening requirements of the landscape ordinance calling for a six foot wooden fence are applicable along the southern boundary, if the southern land use were residential. On January 22, 1991, Planned Development No. 19 was again amended by adding approximately 1.5 acres of this PD to Planned Development No. 16 (Fire station, Library, Retail shopping center), On June 9, 19930 the Planning and Zunin,l commission heard case Z- 93-010 and recommended approval on the "?-16 and office districts with conditions. 4 AgenoaNoC1 Agendal(a ~►B Case No. 2-93-010 July 6, 1993 J Page 5 ANALYSIS This property is located in a low intensity area. According to the Denton Development Plan, these areas are primarily for residential use and some low intensity nonresidential use. When analyzing requests in these areas the following policies are considered: 1. Strict site plan control within 1600 feet of low density residential dwellings. The parcel of land located on the west side of Lillian Miller abuts Indian Ridge subdivision to the west and Southridge East subdivision to the north, both of which are zoned SF-10. All of the adjoining property in this request is for SF-16 lots. However, the proposed office tracts located at the northeast corner of Lillian Millar and Teasley are recommended with strict conditions so as to maintain a low intense use which would blend in with this community. 2. Traffic design to ensure that nonresidential uses have access to collectors or largr- arterials with no direct access through residential streets. The proposed office area has access to Lillian Miller. 3. The overall density/intensity standard is not violated. The current allocation on this site is 17,410.57 trips. As low intensity areas are allowed 60 trips per acre, the IDEA allocation would be 9413.4 (156.89 x 60). The Denton Development Plan lays out two (2) ways to calculate intensity trips. If the proposed rezoning were approved with conditions limiting the gross floor areas of nonresidential uses the following intensity trips would be allocated: Office (55,000/1,000 x 15) 825 Residential (152.19 acres x 20) 3,043 Total 3,868 The total, representing 5,545.4 trips UNOE$ the ideal allocation. i Agenda No - ~ ~ t Agendalte Case No. 2-93-010 fble '7~ o July 6, 1993 Page 6 ANALYSIS, continued If the proposed rezoning were approved with M conditions on the non-residential uses gross floor area the following would be allocated= Office (4.706 acres x 350) 1,647 Residential (152.19 acres x 20) J,043 Total 4,690.1 Still, the requested rezoning would be allocation by 4,723.3 intensity trips, under the allowed 4. Sufficient green spaces, recreational facilities and diversity of parks are provided. The applicant is proposing SF-16 lots (16,000 sf. min. lot size), however, depending on the market, they have indicated the desire for 1 to 3 acre tre;cts, a ranch estates type subdivision. The proposed office area is recommended with increased landscaping and buffering along those areas abutting residential districts. 5. Input into planning by neighborhood associations and councils is encouraged. *This policy is intended to generate input and not veto power. on May 191 19931 the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting in the Civil Defense Room in City Hall. The attendance sheet is attached. The majority of the atten;ees expressed their support for this project. Some, however, had concern about height of the office building, convenience food stores, and gasoline service stations. In addition to the above policies, the Denton Development Plan places this area into a Specific Aren with other policies to consider. The proposed development complies with all of these policies. There is one (1) policy plan that this proposal would violate. genoaNo ~L:i ~;Jtl Auldailem 4 `f Case No. Z-93-010 tie 1 July 6, 1993 C~o ~ts Page 7 ANALYSIS, continued Concentration/Separation Policy, Any neighborhood service center (nonresidential uses) should be located at least one-half mile from any other retail center. There is the Southridge Village shopping center north of this site and a retail center planned at the southwest corner of Teasley and Lillian Miller. In addition, the Plan states that these neighborhood service centers should not exceed i acres in size if they havo direct access onto a primary or secondary arterial. The Planning and Toning Commission0s opinion is that even though these policies are violated that the fact of substantially lowering the intensity from the PD1') Plan is heavily weighed. That by adding conditions to the area designated for office will help to maintain low intense land uses. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval (6-0) with the following conditions; 1. Maximum gross floor area shall not exceed 55,000 square feet on the 4.706 acres of office districts 2. All uses are prohibited in the office district except professional administrative, medical offices, and/or animal clinics with no outside runs or pens; 3. All properties abutting Lillian Miller Parkway shall maintain a 35 foot setback; 4. A landscaping screening and buffering shall be located along the northern and eastern boundary line of the office district and shall be of no less than fifteen fe9t in width containing four (4) canopy trees, and 8 understory trees every 100 linear feet, combined with a 6 foot high wooden fence. The plant material shall come from the suggested plant list attached. i r ) ae~daltem , lip Case No. Z-93-010 C"(-sq July 6, 1993 Page 8 RECOMMENDATION, continued 5. The maximum height of any building in the office district shall be 30 feet. This includes the pitch of the roof. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve petition. 2. Approve petition with additional conditions. 3. Deny petition. 4. Delay consideration. ATTACHMENTS 1. Attendance Sheet. 2. Suggested Plant List. 3. Location Map. 4. PD-19 ordinance with site plan. 5. Verbatim Transcript of Council Meeting, August 19, 1986. 6. Minutes of P&Z, June 9, 1993. AXX003DS ATTACHMENT 1 jle, «'l 8nd9N0 C 81 93 lfO 3Lf 3 C'f~/1 i5 - V66e?v f it C ~t« Cf6c. ma - ,di-4"7., p~~< (z Jo~.~/l~5 I? Ve- 13 Da.,Io F,576p- 2iclie (/Z Ka . n rrt.e_. i lY l 44 z:k ,1,,, OAA , 25. r i c~ Jy ATTACHMENT 2 jaridaNo._____ r AgeneaROM = f2 SUGGESTED PLANT LIST i)lF l 1 :5 C 0 3 1 The following plant list was compiled by the Parks and Recreation Department and represents species which have proven successful and compatible wish Denton soils. This list is not Intended to be all inclusive, but rather as a guide for those not familiar with this area. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME EVFRGRF.F2/ .IOt Wu F.7POS11R8 CANOPY IVXM Afghan Pioe Pinus eldaria x 40' W Sue Flowering Pear Pyres co"no var. "bradford"arloocrW 3ty 1V Sun Bald CA"" Tuodium d'utichum a0' 4a Sun Bipooth Maple Aar jrandidentatum 50' 30' Sun Burt Oak Quercus macro arps 75' a$' Sun Caddo Mark Acer barbatum var. addo 60' 40 Sun Cedar Elm Lnmus crassirolis 75' .44. Sun Chinquapin Oak Quercus muehlenberjil 60' So' Sun/Pan Shade Pastel Red Cedar Junipenm vt mans x 40' 3d Sun Japs new Black Pine Pinue Ihuntxrgii x 30' 30' Sun I-Ambark Elm tnmus parvifolia 45' 3$' Sun Osage Orange, thorn and fruitless Madura pomifern'Part' So' 40' Pan Shade PankJed Golden Rain Tree Koelreuteris pniculata 35' W Sun Pecan Caryl illincensis so, 60' Sun Shumard Oat Quercus shumardi 70' 50' Sun Southern LWe Oat Quereus virjinuna x 40' 30' Sun Sweetjum 1Jquidamberstyracinua 60' 40' SuTJPacl Shade T9s Red Oak Quercus taana 40 4a Suit Western Soapberry Sapindus drummond'd 40' 3a SunRan Shade UNDERSTORY TRM Cape Mynk Lgentrcemla india 20' to, Sun Consent Easiern Red Cedar Juniperus Aginians 'amend' x 25' Is, Sun 43eciduous Holly (Pas umhaw) Ila decidus x 1S' 1W Sun/Shade Doren Wow Chilopsislinaris 20' Is, Sun Eves Neckxt Sopbm aRinis 25' 20' Su/Shade eFlowerinjCrabapple Malusbybd& 20' 2W Sub Flowering Peach Prunus penis Is, 15' Sue Medan Buckeye Ungnad'u specious 2tr 20' Sunshade .Masan Plum Prune mcdans 25' 25' SurvShade 00kiaboms, or Makin Redbud Cercis anademis var. tesenals 'ckUboaWWinesiana' 25' 25' Sub WeWlnle Myrica cerifers x Is, 10' Surul'art Shade 1supon Hoity lies vomitoria x is, Is, Sun/Shade 0TIOR Pnntinu Pho inia serrukts 15' Ir Sun/Shade roster Holly na anenuals x 15, 10' Sun/Shade SgfRUBS Abelia, Anrf Glossy 'Edward couches' Abelis s jrandirloa x 4' 4' Suwpart Shade Agadla Mahon is i6roliouts x s' 4' SunRom Shade Althes (Rose of Sharon) Hibiscus ryriacus x to, a' SurvShade i s Agend2llem~ ODMMONNAME SCEENDFICNAMR LYF7tGRtFN I(EIGIfP XtpS~ r t 3~I Barberry Bcrbcdsnhunbergil 'stropurpura' 1' Sun Shade Barberry, Crimson Pygmy Berberv Ihunbergii 'crimson 2' 3' Sunshade Pygmy, Burford Holy, Dwarf Bea cornuta'burfordii nana' X 7' Sunshade Chinese Nosy, Dwarf Ila cornuta 'rotunda' X V 3' Sunshade EuagnA Silverberry ElaeaSnus x ebbingei x 9' 9' SuNPae Shade Flameleaf Euonymus'Red flail' Euonymus slats compacts 4' S' SunrPsn Shade Fosters Hotly llex x menuata'rosteri' X ta' l0' Sunshade Flowering Oulnce Chaenomeles japonica S' f' Su%5sde Forsythia Fonymbia x intermedis 6' Sun/Pad Shade Hollywood Juniper Junipers chinensis car. hornlosa' x 10' V Sun Mary Neu Holy Ilex cv. 'Mary Nell' x 13' IV Sunshade. Nandins, Compact Nandin t domutia 'compacu' x S' 6' SuNShade Nana Nandins Nandina domatica 'nano' x Y 2' Survshadc Nellie R. Stevens Holy flex cv,'Nellie R. Stevens' X IS' IS' Sunshade Pampas Grw Coruderia sellana a' I' Sun Phoinia, Frasees Photinia x fraseri x 12' & SurvPan Shade Priam Juniper Junipers chinensu var.'pliuce x 6' 6' Sun Spines Vanho"rne Spiraea I vanhouttei 6' SunNart Shade Shore Juniper )untrnrus conferu X 1' 4' Sun Ysupon Noly, Dwarf flex vomatiria'nans' X 2' 3' Sunshade GROUND COVER Asiatk Jasmine Tnchelospermum aslatleum x 6" 2' Sunshade Creeping Juniper Juniperss honeontalu x 1.5' C Sun Dwarf Periwinkk Vinci minor x 2' Shade English Ivy Hedera helix x IV t' Shade Gray Sonlolina Saniolina chamaecyparisrua x 13' Sun Honeysuckle, Japanese Purple Lonicen Japonia'purF ircs' x 18" l' Suw?art Shade Unope lAriope muscar, x II l' Sun/Shsde Mondo Grass Ophlopogon Japonicua x it Shade Japanese Garden Juniper Junipers procumiens 'nano' x S' Sun VINES Baron Ivy Parthenocissus trkspldats 2tY SurvShade Carolina Jessamine Gctsemium sempervlrcns x 1S' Sun Chtneae Wisteria Wisterts sInehtli 23' SuOirt Shade Coral Honeysucide Lon" kmpcnircns x 18' Sun Cress Vine 814nonia apreotats x Sun?art Shade English by Hedera helps Shade Lady Banksta Rae Roan bank3lae IZ' Sul! Sweet Autumn Ckmatis Ckmatis paniculata 1S' Sunshade Trumpet Creeper Campala t talliabuana'msdame 7S' Sun/Part Shade gafea' Virginia Creeper PorthenocMus quinquerolis 23' Sunshade GRASS, TV" Bermuda Gnu Sun Buffalo Oran Sun St, Fescte Grass SurvShade Tau Fescue x Shsde 2 t 6 M1 Cf, ~ ~ pgendaNo.C) ATTACHMENT 3 Agendallenl 01,93-015 Hunter's Ridge Weit NORTH ~ t W ti v ~ ~a r • i ~ ,o 0. ~D 1 D a SHE slum r , ~ 1 f ~ f re Sundown Ranch , Location Map Date: 5118/93 Scale: None 4 i -i 1 gendakc _ - ioenda Item ` L PEE ATTACHMENT 4 Ic1 9, Cf No. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE EXISTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDINANCE AND ENACTING A NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ORDI- NANCE FOR THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED$ AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AS SAME WAS ADOPTED AS AN APPENDIX TO THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON BY ORDINANCE $0. 69-1 TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATED FROM SINGLE FAMILY 'SF-10' TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 'PD' DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE AS SAID PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP APPLIES TO 161.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF TEASLEY LANE AND LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY AND AS MORE PARTICULARLY UE,CRIBED HEREINI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, HEREBY O'tDAINS! SECTION I. That the existing planned development district zoning ordi-ppli Tracte AI thcraoble to lU InlExhioltrt'A' Of the attached ropert eand lmade as part hereof for all purposes, Is hereby repealed in Its And there is hereby enacted a new planned development :ftiaintty[ ordinance and comprehensive site plan of sale property. SECTION I1_ That the Zoning classl(icatien and use designation appli- cable to any or all of the property described a$ Tracts 1 through 10 in Exhibit •A' 4trachea hereto and made a part hereto for all purposes is hereby Changed from Single Family •SF-10. District Classification and us* to Planned Development 'PD' District classification and use. SECTION III. s That the property described herein and designated herein as Planned development Zoning district shall, prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the use of any building thereon, comply with the following conditions) 1. That sidewalks meeting the City's standards and specifications be installed on at least one side of the Streets throughout the development. SECTION IV. The complianc0 with the site the property shall be In substantial hereof for all purposes. Ps The toning Map of the City of Denton, Texas, adopted the 14th day of January, 1969, as an Appendix to the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton, Texas under Ordinance No. 69-1, be, and the same is hereby amended to show such change in District Classification and Use subject to the above conditions and specifications. SECTION V. That the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby finds that such change is in accordance with a comprehensive 2-1660/ROBERT G. WACHTER/PAGE 1 PI Ago o tl f3 Ageidal -c We - 1 G c ' plan for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of the City of Denton, Texac, and with reasonable consideration, among other things for the character of the district and for its peculiar suitability or particular uses, and With a view to conserving the value of the buildings, protecting human lives, and encouraging the most appropriate uses of land for the maximum benefit to the City of Denton, Texas, and its citizens. SECTION VI. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage and approval, the required public hearings having heretofore been held by the Planning and toning Commission and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, after giving due notice thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this the r`day of 1984. I STEW' T ,EXASAYOR CIT O F D NTON T ATTEST: L C T LLEN, CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: JOE D. MORAISO ATTING CITY ATTORNEY CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS BYr CJ • vtih f-1660/R0BERT G. NACHTER/PACE 2 a 1 I 4 rY'~1 O /D-0117F•AIIKNp i Of-10 , Trr .rlYNfr. IM...rYY V....N rY 0/Kd.1p 1r YYK.rYY 1 rl Y Y W , r.. Y N Yfa.Y f \ll ~ iµ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ GS ii YJ q IIYYY \ 0/-1~ i V ,.1 y.w 1...4.1 Y MAMI s o , V 1 a D! f h110 1 3` O µT 44.64'.. l ~1111p MV N u I-V p r r: 110 p \ 6 TNIM/ Nr I.r Iu..Ww - Iw. D Yw.rK 1alOro.Yrrfat" N MYN y. 1 O r. ref' _ -'1 IO. N~f 1 SLJ 4.w w "N.60 L.4. ~ fr.~ p~rf • r r \ le,~~_..r.N _ I J IV Orrr MN io.'J.YKt r1 Y. Y r V •1 hA I 1 1' ,f(~.,[j co Oplh 1nOk vapM lieu"" No LOW 11N OYfrr1 AN. IW op M" TrrOf "A Var IM . V V 01111r 11x10 "m Ob GppIJ "Olr ll."m 7a 7111 Oprr AIW 11.W 0 0wr ftw, 100AOO V0lA 11,010 woow q 17.12 700 b ) 1Y1.79Mf 700 1610 Ofte OA0 0 OMW 1 MAM V N{ M W 0 1,000 WA WA OM1N /4A0 40 Y•10 10 107 111~0fp j w? " of V-1 701 7011 1 ~.r..... BWAN L0 0 011110 O.Mwell WO faY~Or O..Y TKYsrAw" 101.61 AMT few 10,1411 Gomm x0..0 I+r doY14t I f.~rY~r^Y ti Y^~~~ 11~~.rYN ~1 PLAN .r @r /M1001 ~j DIMENSKa f MNIE1,0PNIENT CO NIMNY RIDGEWAY MEADOWS rrwrlr.r 0 im w1.r1rp1 7Y."Ioi" ~ I~ JJR WWI. .1 ~ a VendaNo cy ATTACHMENT 5 agenda It em-19 l t/ CITY COUNCIL MINUraS ?3lE ~r C - FAOM TAPE DATED 06119181 C 8 `7 ' wy Mayor Stephens: The next item is 19. I-2818-petition of Dimension Development Company requesting an amendment to a planned development PD-19 and PD-82 and approval of a concept plan for the single family ISP-I0), single family ISF-7) cluster housing and park areas located east of Lillian Miller Parkway at the intersection of Teasley Lane, FM 2181. The 161.7 acres was zoned planned development by Ordinance 81109 and pecmits the development of cluster, multi-family, 9enetal retail, single family 10,000 equate feet, single family 7,000 square feet, office, park and a community facility site. The amendment would change areas as mentioned is the backup material. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to speak in favor of z-1918. Please come forward and like the others state your name and your anchor and proceed. Pick Neff: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, my name is Rick Neff, I'm with Dimension Development Company, We bring this before you this evening asking approval of this change in the uses on our property. The property ,as zoned PO in 19d1. we ace coming before you to change some ~f the uses, we are also asking approval of a concept plan which was not required in 1981 which gives you a much better idea of what exactly it is we plan to do. I would be happy to answer any questions. Mayor Stephens: Okay, what did you say your name was please sit? Fick Neff: My name is Fick Neff, N-E-F-F. Mayor Stephens: As in Pat, Governor Pat Neff? Rick Neff: Yes sic. Mayor Stephens: Okay. You related? Rick Neff: Yes air. Mayor Stephens: Are you? All right, that das a long time ago, that won't help you or hurt you. Rick Neffs I'm glad to heat that. Mayor Stephens: Okay. Anyone else like to ask me. Rick Neff any questions? Council Member Aiddlespecgecs I noticed that it's on Lillian Miller. Rick Neff: Yes sic. Council Member Riddlesperger: Are you going to Pave the other two lanes of that street? I didn't see this in your material, I just wondered? Rick Neff: There must have been a reason for that sic. .40 sit, we don't have that in our plans at this moment. Council Member Riddlespergers It seems to me that there is a part, a part of the problem your going to have there and in terms of access and I just wondered why that wasn't in that plan? i C{ ogma No. Cit! luncil minutes A e~tlIN fto it ape Dated 08/19/86 t. Page 8 7 Rick Neffr That's a good question sir, 1'■ not Aire I have a real good answer for that, except that's not in our plans at this point. Council Member McAdamsi Is there going to oe right-of-way for that left. Rick Neff: we've dedicated the right-of-way already, Council Member McAdamsf Okay. Mayor Stephenst Okay, other questions Mr. Neff? Thank you sir. Rick Neff: Thank you. Mayor Stephens: Is there anyone else in the audience who would like to speak in favor of this petition? Jerry Cott: Mayor Stephens and City Council Members, I'm Jerry Cott, Sundown Ranch, Suet to the south of this. Basically we are in favor of this with two comments. Comment number one is that in the original agreement where you see a black line on the south of Dimension Development's Property, Mr. Wachter, many years ago when he started and many times since has agreed to put a permanent brick or stone eight-foot wall between that property and my property and I just wanted to make sure that that was in the petition. Number two. Please don't accept this As a lecture, but all of those properties are now zoned on a first-come, first-served basis and I know that this City Council and the zoning and the people of this community are wrestling with that issue. Tnere is no toning, I am zoned agricultural, that I could have at this print in time except Sr-15, which would not go over the City Guile according to the Planning Guide, and I strongly urge that you take the issue of first-come, first-served up and seriously eliminate that is part of this community's operating procedire, shank you. Mayor Stephens: Okay, any questions to Mr. Cott? :hank you sir. Is there anyone else who like to speak In favor of I-1818? Anyone else who waNild like to speak in favor of this petition? Anyone else in favor? Hearing none, let me ask if there is anyone in the audience who like to speak in opposition to t-1819? Claudia Brownt My name is Clacdis Browh and I live at 115 Ridgecrest in Southridge and I just want to know if t'ois is approved, what is he going to do, or what is the City going to do so that these people can get in and out, tecaise we can't get in and out, and that's my only opposition to it. Council Member Riddlespetger: You'rb asking the same question I asked, who's going to pave the other two lanes of Ridgeway? Claudia Brownt well, I've only there four years and to my knowledge, I can either get out by Teasley Lane or I can get out by Lillian Miller, which is you know, fairly new, or you Can leave by the access road. wall you can't leave by the access toad because the traffic backs up off the interstate and so you can't get back, you can't get oy cw g~ tack to town which is where I work. And if you go out Lillian Miller, then in the morning I have to wait three or four traffic lights to go that way. And I can't even get out anymore on Teasley, so I just, how am 1 going to get to work? i City 'ouncil minutes lQentlaNo Fro, ape Dated 08/19/86 Page 3 Agendait C We Mayor Stephens: Okay. I see what you mean Ms. Brown./ ` L) questions of Ms. Brown? Okay, thank ` Any 1 presume when the time comes, the trafYou- Staff Will fic situation. Okay, esis there anyone else who would like to speak in opposition to 2-18187 Anyone in opposition) Anyone in opposition? Let me declare this, well watt a minute we have a rebuttal, would the petitioner like to address the particular limit question raised end yyourself only to the question raised) We thank you. we de See the public hearing to be closed and call upon the City Manager to direct his staff presentation. City Manager Harrell: Yes, let me at least statpe byse a asking the Planning Seaff.to make the primacy presentation h, Cecile CounciCarscmi Urban already has been mentioned this Mis re a s plof the anned development that is approved and in place under Ordinance 84109. This is an amendment to that proposal and a request for approval of a concept plan on the residential areas. the three areas of concern are basically, I would like to point out to you for clarification is, a change from 15 acres of cluster sohouutsihn,gtothaatsiwould have familyaSF 7e districtott a a3property 39 ace son the ingle family area on the north ooundary line that was SP-10 that would be changed to single family on 7,000 square toot lots also: and an addition to the until in the 24.53 acre cluster housing area that abuts the light industrial planned development on the eastern ooundary line. rhia property does abut Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley at the intersection in the original planned development when it was approved right-of- ay, to answer one of the questions, was provided oy these developers and paving was done of those two lanes. Additional right-of-way has been provided by the developers to construct the additional two lanes for Lillian millet's expansion and it's my understanding that the money situation for that will oe invoi.ed through the bonding process or the bond approval to actually do the paving of those additional lanes on Lillian Miller north of 35. to clarify the issue drought up oy Mr. Cott concerning the fence. In the original ordinance, there was not a condition Imposed to build or construct that fence. In discussions with the Legai Department, since this is an amendment, it was stated that that item is something that should be addressed technically during the detailed plan stage when these developers would be required to bring back their specific details and screening for the project and it is not an item that should be addressed at this point. However, we did mention to Mr. Cott that it would oe for his best benefit to have it on the record of the Planning and g Commission t concernedand still inte interested at that Council i plan stagestll itoo, have the fence constructed. The overall' amendment does not significantly change the intensity or the density in this area. It remains at the consistent amount of approximately six p ercent over the standard. The proposal does seem to add a number of Planning andbeZneonfiits Commission diidereeommend n the at e approval a by and vote of 5-1. There were nine reply forms mailed to property owners within 200 feet and one was returned in favor. And if you have any questions . .,a, w P.eased to respond. Mayor Stephens: Any questions of the Council to Ms. Carson. Ms. Carson would elaborate dust a little bit more. You said that it would not change the density all that much. To change from Sf-10 to SP-7 and to increase the number of cluster F i City ^cuncil minutes Pros pe Dated 08/19/86 agenda No Page . AgenMtom ~6Q { C housing, whatever cluster housing is, and that comes different definitions I think, looks lik under the density a bit. IN that would lnrnde Carson, In certain areas it will change the density as an increasye,ofbuatpprbyxi oemlaitminelyat1ingu 20thenitsclausndter e rhousing it which siRadngle have tel you have a Ssignificant lreductioni In that OnenareaQer acre, f sinle amily 10 and single family 7 is about a .7 dit[ere ce between the there's) noty atwhole unit edifference e on o the the developers, so the cluster area, they are Increasing it bQeapproxima and in 25 units. But there's still an overall decrease in othe retotal units for the project and that really has a great deal to do ' with the fact that their figures or theft density figures for the SP-7 is slightly lower than what we use as a standard in most straight zoning regrests for single family with 7,000 foot lots. then, affect the to property development. Carson: knat has been recommended in the Development Guide basically is when one of these Intensity areas is over the standard that we look at it from an entire planning area and what the surrounding land uses are. This will provide some additional flexlDility for Mr. Cott or whoever may at some point zone the property to the south. That we would look at what the surrounding zoning is in ordrr to consider a proposal for his property though it is over the standard, It would be more of a land planning issue than an intensity issue at that point, since the intensity has been used. Mayor Stephens: Then on the other side, has the transition to the north side been changed. The Village, or what ever that was. Carson: The property to the north that louts the single family, or that abuts this family is single family with 10,000 square foot lots. Mayor Stephens: On that the Village? The wall on it? Carson, that property abets Teasley and comes back towards this corner, and you might point it out, the property is split on the northern boundary s,j that tr.ere is a douole transition, the sevens going to the tens does not significantly alter it. cownfhensi econcerningstraffic. *.AS Ilunderst d address the intensity, as you explained it, the intensity is not changed not much. Carsons As far as our traffic generatio.t, correct. Mayor Stephens, $o that was I belisvd was the extent of her question which means this zoning will not adversely affect it any more teen its already been affected, then what Is already In place. Carson: Right, the zoning that is in place today would be the same traffic generator as the amendment that's being proposed. City •iuncil Minutes L (7 from pe Dated 08/19/85 ageaaaRem_ Page s E1afe ~.t f. Mayor Stephens: I see. carson: So they will not generate any more traffic and then the road itself would be as part of that bond proposal to actually do the other lanes for construction which would improve the area but the intensity would not change because of this amendment. Mayor Stephenss Mr. Riddlesperger's question, do you want to address that in a moment? Mayor Stephens: well let me see, any more questions for Ms. Carson though. Carson: Mr. Illison was just pointing out as somethinq that the citizens of the area might be interested in is that there is a proposed collector that s shown through this property that connects Lillian Miller. At this point it would dead and in that cluster area. The developers In this request have been working with the State School and with the adjoining property owners to extend that collector street to State School Road which would ultimately be Loop 288. That would add an additional access out of that Sauthridge, southeast Denton area to the south and to the east which would provide some additional assistance In traffic. , mayor Stephens: Across state property? Carson: The property that is presently o'.+ned by the State School. where the Park, Brier Cliff Park is presently located and is a lease agreement with the City for the pack to be located there. The collector street alignment at this point would go through that property and connect into State School Road. Mayor Stephens: who would pay for the road across state property? Carsoni I believe that the developers would pay the majority of it that vent through their actual development. Mayor Stephens: Yean, I know, but, on State School Road, who would pay for that? The developer? Carson: I believe that it would be, you know, something that would have to be worked out, whets the developers and ptobaoly the City wo,:id have participation of some kind of agreement to build that roai. The speciftce have not determined that I know of . Mayor Stephens: okay, thank you. Mr. City Manager. Lloyd Harrell: Yes, Mr. Mayors I just wanted to elaborate ust a bid on Council Riddlesperger's question regarding Lillian Miller end clarify to the Council, that as part of the capital Improvement Program that has been filed with the Council by the Planning and Zoning Commission. It does call for funding to complete that section to a four lane section on Lillian Miller. And as council is aware that now wall Ga fca.:rleE back to the Citizen Capital Improvement Committee that the Council has recently proposed and that will be back to you probably within the next couple of months for final decision, and then possibly a bond issue. [ .f City Council Minutes AAOn(4dIV0 Nor -ape Dated 06/19/86 fJ peg, Ap~ndalleml Carson: If 1 might address this more specifically, the main ` "S reason for this is because the amendment does not affect the entire southern boundary of that pro3ect. It only affects one small property, which, since it is an amendment we would technically only have control over requesting that that masonry wall be located along, that one section of S!-?, l.nich could potentially create more of a problem then waittnq until the detail plan when it could be placed all the we, across the southern boundary, And what has been done, is there are letters and statements from Mr. Cott and it is in the Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission and now in the Minutes of the City Council, that this to an item tnat should oe addressed. So that it will be on file and in the planning staff's records so that when the detailed plan is submitted, that item can be inserted as a condition to that detailed plan. Mayoc Stephens! well, why couldn't it be insetted now so you can remove that uncertainty and have it as a matter of record? Carson: It is my understanding that Mr. Mortis had a problem with It because it was only an amendment to a portion of the planned development and you could only requite the fence along that portion of the planned development that was being amended. So it might actually divide the neighborhood and have part of it with a fence and pare of it not depending on how their detail plan was submitted. Lloyd Martell: At. Mayor, It t may. My understanding is that all the parties are in agreement. That fence, it I understand correctly, from the developer, everyone is in agreement that that will be provided during the development process, and what we're talking about is just the technique for insuring that it is accomplished. And I think that is why the staff suggested that we put that request in the minutes and what I would suggest is just a statement similar to the one that I made. That everyone is in agreement that that fence will be provided at the appropriate time when the final development plan is produced, so that every)ody understands that. I think from a legal standpoint it'a best to do it later although the litenslons should be ekpressed at this point. Debts DtlyovitCh! I think it you go ahead and have a pocifon, I mean you could go ahead and include that as a condition of the ordinance before you, and I'm not sure of the affect it would have later on. gut I think you still nave the opporr:nity to Come back at a later point in time and will have the authority to withhold development approval until that Condition is met, council Member McAdams: Is the motion in order? Mayor Stephens: Yes the motion is in order. i Council Member McAdams: Then I went ova tA__ _ aDDrQy{)`gf t-IAlE the ordinance as provided _in._the agenda packet. And a3 as a note In er?fintes that council deaices at ens time 0T-it r *W o the det`aTled site plan, that a fence along that northern, do we consider that... the southern wall, southern, I mean southern boundary, thli the ao1:G -finIC 11on7 the southern boundary be .lncorporaeed in, that deu:te~°site plan. Council Member Alford: second that. 1 _i x City council minutes fror npe Dated 06/19/86 Fagk fh19 r` /Mayor Stephensr Okay, motion second to approve the ordinance us with the condition of the eight-foot masonry fence be added at the appropriate time. Any further discussion, Madam secretary. on toll call vote, McAdams 'aye," Alexander "aye#" Hopkins "aye," Alford "eye," Aiddlesperger "aye," chew "aye," and Mayor Stephens "aye." Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Stephensi All voted Aye, ti t51?~ Norm% ATTACHMENT 6 Agendallem ( Date Minutes Planning 6 Zoning commission June 9, 1993 Page 3 eastern half of Lot 7 and all of Lot a. Mr. Cooper seconded and the motion carried unanimously (6-0). IV. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning from the Planned Development district No. 19: a 4.71 acre tract to the Office district with conditions on property located on the east side of Lillian Miller, directly across from the "T" intersection of Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller; a 4.71 acre tract to Single Family 16 just north of the 4.71 acre tracti and, a 16.2 acre tract to SF-16 located at the northwest corner of Lillian Miller and Teasley Lane. STAFF REPORT: by Frank Robbins Mr. Robbins reported that the case was a substantial down zoning from PD 19 to SF 16. The previous approved planned development was known as Dimension. The applicant has requested rezoning from Planned Development District No. 19 to: West side of Lillian Miller north of Teasley - a 16.2 acre tract: SF-16. On the east side of Lillian Miller and Teasley, north of the "T" intersection - 4.706 acres to Office district with conditions, 136 acres to SF-16. The case will be the largest decrease in intensity trips in five years. The area as general retail on the previous plan would be down zoned and staff has recommended conditions. The applicant amended the proposal so that all of the land will be SF-16 except 4 plus acres that would be zoned office. Dr. Huey asked if the amendment called for neighborhood services or office zoning. Mr. Robbins said the amendment was asking for office and SF- 16. There would be 3 separate office zoned lots, the entire tract would be SF16. A church has shoWA interest in one lot. The church would be allowed in All SF-16 zoning districts. Property would be in accordance with the principal policy of the Denton Development Plan. The intensity allocation after the rezoning would be under the allowed allocation by 40723 trips. Staff has proposed bufteriny conditions. The applicant would at a later date have the opportunity to decide if they want to apply for or participate in our voluntary park dedication program. Staff recommended that they do participate. However, there Is no requirement to participate in park land dedication. Neighborhood associations have had input and positive remarks on the downzoning. The City policy has been to get feedback from property owners and neighborhood 49endaNo Agenda4m t4 Minutes ~1e Planning i Zoning Commission ) Ltd-'~~~` June 9, 1993 Page 4 groups. The ore, policy that would be violated would be the 1/2 mile separation policy. It says that non residential development and low intensity area should be separated by 1/2 mile. The office zoning district is closer than 1/2 mile to another Planned Development and is within 1/2 mile to the shopping center to the north, but with the substantial downzoning and the buffer standards the staff thinks that it should be approved. The staff recommended a number of conditions: 1. Maximum gross floor area in 4.7 acres office zoning should not exceed 55,000 square feet. 2. The only uses allowed in the office district would be animal clinics with no outside run, and professional offices. 3. All properties abutting Lillian Miller would have a 35 foot setback. 4. Landscape screening and buffering should be located on the northern and eastern boundary line of the Office district no less than 15 feet wide and contain four (4) canopy trees, and 8 understory trees every 100 linear feet, combined with a 6 foot high wooden fence. The plant material must come from an approved list. Some of the MXD buffer yard standards have been applied. 5. The maximum height of any building in the Office district shall be 30 feet. This would include the pitch of the roof. Dr. Huey asked about the area on page two that stated there would be no residential drives permitted on Teasley Lane or Lillian Miller. She wanted to know if that meant access driveways. Mr. Robbins said it did mean access drives and it was part of the subdivision regulations, Dr. Huey asked if there would be turn lanes on Lillian Miller. She pointed out that one of the overheads showed turn lanes. Mr. Robbins said there may have been turn lanes indicated on the overhead of the old PD, but turn lanes were not proposed at the present time. He did not think they would bo needed or required. Mr. Engelbrecht mentioned that there was an :;em under transportation that said turn lanes would require an 80 foot stacking with a 50 foot transition. It did i,ot state there would be any, but they would have to follow that criteria if turn lanes were installed. Mr. Engelbrecht asked about the 16 bgeMa No agandzlte~ k_ Minutes lie L- Planning & Zoning Commission June 9, 1993 Page 5 feet utility easement. He pointed out that the city was requesting a 16 feet utility easements next to public right- of-way, and a 25 foot building line, 8 feet where the building line is less than 25 feet. Mr. Robbins reported that the 16 foot easement was a standard request. It would enable adequate room for underground utilities. Along the front of the properties 16 feet would be asked for. Mr. Engelbrecht asked if the 16 feet applied to the interior of the development as well. Mr. Robbins said yes, it would apply to all of the development. Mr. Engelbrecht said that he thought we had been only asking for 8 feet for utility easement in residential subdivisions with a 25 foot setback. Mr. Robbins said that the 16 foot utility easement was common practice according to the Utility Department. It has been practice for about a year. Mr. Engelbrecht said he had some concerns. If a person is required to have a 25 foot setback requirement and 16 feet of that will be for utility easements there would not be a lot of room for trees and landscaping and have a good survival rate. Petitioners No Comments In Favors Robert Reeves 500 S. Ervay Dallas Nations Bank and Trust Dept. Mr. Reeves said he was not opposed to the petition. He wanted to go on record with the clarification of an issue. On page 23 of backup there was some history of PD 19 about a verbal agreement to build an 8 foot high masonry fence along the southern bounelary that separated the property owned by Mr. Cott. Back in late 1990-91 a representative for the bank applied for an amendment to PD 16. PD 16 is a retail district. There was a land swap between the owners of PD 16 and the City of Denton, because the city wanted to build a fire station. It was determined at the time of the amendment that the fence would not impact us. He again stated he was requesting that any conditions agreed to in the past that had pertained to a fence between the properties have no obligations attached to Nations Bank and Trust. He said all of their property, including the city property was PD 16. They were not responsible for any type of fence. AGfr~ C ,I.~ . rr:! e Minutes ' Planning Zoning Commission June 9, 1993 Page 6 In opposition: none The public hearing was closed. move recommend d bydstaff. MreGlasscockase onded case Z-93-010 as the motion carried unanimously (6-0) V. Hold a public hearing and consider the rezoning of a 6.427 acre tract from the Agricultural district to the Planned Development district with a detailed plan on the property located west of the intersection of Pennsylvania Drive and Southmont Drive, immediately south of St. Marks Catholic detached Church for the purpose of two (2) one-family d residential dwelling units, agricultural uses and a private cul de sac. Chairman Engelbrecht opened the public hearing. An addendum to the staff report was passed out to the commissioners. STAFF REPORT: Report by Frank Robbins Mr. Robbins said that the addendum was for clarification. He Private streets are only aDll wed lin forreported a private street. was Planned tx~velopment districts. The PD would restrict the PD by zoning It for only two structures. The conditions that are recommended to this case are as follows: 1. A security gate would be installed out of metal railings at the point Southmont Drive dead ends into this district shall not be allowed or permitted unless the City Council approves the request for the abandonment of the cul-de-sac that was reflected in Exhibit "A". 2. The security gate referenced above shall not be permitted or allowed unless a covenant running with the land is executed by the owners of the subject property and filed of record which 1e iabilities, maintenance, harmless use the oCity of Denton frog a,ny l r nonuse of the security gate and fire lane. This covenant shall Planning and Development and the City Attorney. Director of 3. The Fire Chief is authorized to require a key lock box to the security gate top provide Fire c and Police Safety Personnel bi\hersman.o Dote ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, REPEALING PLANNED DE- VELOPMENT (PD) NO. 19 ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE 84-109, BY REZONING 4.706 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY, NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH TEASLEY LANE, TO OFFICE (0-c) ZONING DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS; AND REZONING 16.205 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TEASLEY LANE AND LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY AND 135.986 ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY, NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH TEASLEY LANE TO SINGLE FAMILY (SF-16); PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Hersman Development/Lybert Properties has requested the repeal of Planned Development (PD) No. 19, established with the adoption of Ordinance 84-109, by rezoning 4.'06 acres to Office (0-c) zoning district with conditions and by rezoning a 16.205 acre tract and a 135.986 acre tract to Single Family (SF-16) zoning districts; and WHEREAS, on June 9, 1993, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the requested changes in zoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the changes in zoning will be in compliance with the Denton Development Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON ORDAINS: SECTION I. That Planned Development (PD) No. 19 is hereby re- pealed and the following portions of land which are described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof for all pur- poses, are rezoned as follows: (a) the 4.706 acre tract is hereby rezoned to an Office (0-e) zoning district classification and use designation with conditions; and (b) the 16.205 acre tract and the 135.986 acre tract are hereby rezoned to Single Family (SF-16) zoning district class- ification and use designation. under the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton. SECTION II. That in accordance with Ordinance No. 91-078, the 4.706 acres of land designated as (O-c) shall be subject to the following conditions: (a) maximum gross floor area shall not exceed 55,000 square feet; it u 1 (b) all uses in the Office zoning district are prohibited except professional, administrative, medical offices, and/ or animal clinics with no outside runs or pens; (c) landscape screening and buffering shall be located along the northern and eastern boundary line and shall be of no less than fifteen (15) feet in width containing four (4) canopy trees, and eight (8) understory trees every 100 linear feet, combined with a six (6) foot high wooden fence. The plant material shall be of a type included upon the suggested plant list attached hereto as Exhibit "B", and made a part hereof for all purposes; and (d) all property abutting Lillian Mille Parkway shall maintain a thirty-five (35) foot building L'-.back. SECTION IIi. That any person violating any provision of this ordinance shall, upon conviction, be fined a sum not exceeding $2,000. Each day that a provision of this ordinance is violated shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. SZCTION iv. That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) days from the date of its passage, and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within ten (10) days of the dale of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY1 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY7 _&aN,,u a flc PAGE 2 ACvdaNo EXHIBIT "A" Agenda'tem. ~ Dite_1 .'Y' YIELD NOTES 4.706 Acres Being all that certain lot, tract or parcel of land situated in the John McGowan Survey, Abstract Number 797, the B. Lewis Survey, Abstract Number 769, the M.E.P. 6 P.RR Survey, Abstract Number 930 and the J. Fisher Survey, Abstract Number 421 City of Denton, Denton County, Texas, being part of a certain called 181.92 acre tract described in a deed recorded in Voluve 819, Page 268 of the Deed Records of Denton County, Texas, being particularly described as follows BaGIM01NO at a 1/2" iron rod found on the test right- of way line of Lillian Miller Parkway (80 foot right- of-wsy) afros which the northwest corner of said called 181.93 cre tract bears N 38047'4911 N, 2286.93 feats THMM N 01'04117" N, 811.00 feet along the east right- of-way line of said Lillian Fuller Parkway to a 1/2" iron rod found at the point of curvature of a curve to the righti THEUCZ continuing along the east right-of-way of said Lillian Miller Parkway and with the are of said curve having a radius of 960.00 feet, acentral angle of 00'31 14", whose chord bears N 00'48,110" I, 9.00 feat, an arc length of 9.00 feet to a 1/2" iron rod sett TnMCE 9 88423125" E, 249496 feet to a 1/2" iron rod sot! TUMCE S 01'04117" E, 820.00 feet to a 1/2" iron rod sets THENCE N 88'23125" N, 150.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGIVNIN01 and containing approximately 4.706 acres of land. Page 1 of 4 VendaNol "A" EXHIBIT (lon't) We FIELD NOTES BRING a 16.2053 acre tract of land in the John McGowan Survey, Abstract No. 797, Denton County, Texas, and being part of a 181.92 acre (called tract or parcel of land described in a deed from Patrick a. Gibbons, Substitute Trustee, to the Synod of Texas Presbyterian Foundation on January 41 1971s recorded in volume 619, Page 268, Deed Records of Denton County, Texasl BBGINMIHG at a 1/2" s uare pipe found in the West right-of- way line of Lillian Miller Parkway (80 toot right-of-way) and the North right-of-way line of F.M. 2181, (Teasley Lane, 90 foot right-of-way) as dedicated to the City of Denton as recorded in Volume 1340, Page 2031 Dead Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE N 89'43004" N, along the North right-of-way line of said Teasley Lane, a distance of 511.77 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for corner and being the southeast corner of Denton Pilgrim Addition, an addition to the City of Denton as recorded in Cabinet Of Page 154, Plat Records of Denton County, Texasl THBVCE N 00'34145" E, leaving the North right-of-way line of Teasley Lane and passing along the east line of said Denton Pilgrim Addition, and the east line of Indian Ridge, an addition to the city of Denton, as recorded in cabinet D, Page 264, Plat Records of Denton County # Texas, a distance of 1122691 feet to a 1/2' iron rod found for corner, said corner being the Northeast corner of said Ir3ian Ridge, and being in the South line of Southrid a East Phase 1, an addition to the City of Denton, as recorded in Cabinet D, page 315, Plat Records of Denton County, Texas; THENCE N 89445027 B, along and with a fence line and with the south line of said Southridge East Phase I, passing the southeast corner of Southridge East Phase I at 652.46 feet, for a total distance of 889.32 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found for corner, said point being in the Wost&rly right-of-way line of Lillian Miller Parkway) TNSMCE S 29'58011" V. along said Westerly line of said Lillian Miller Parkway a distance of 506.59 feet to a 1/2" s uare pipe found for corner, said corner being a be inninq of a curve to the left having a radius of 1040.00 feet and a long chord of S 14'26#59" ii, a distance of 556.58 feet] THSMCX along said curve for an arc distance of 563.45 feet to the point of tangency, a 1/2" square pipe found for corner; Page 2 of 4 ~I r l t{ G~:iEBRI EXHIBIT "A" (Con't( THENCE S 01'04#170 L, continuing along the Kest right-of-way ~l JL~ line of said Lillian Miller Parkway, a distance of 151.34 feet to the por T or nEGINNINO and containing 705,904 square feet or 15,2053 acres of lend, more or less. Page 3 of 4 4 V ~ WaNo, EXHIBIT "A" (Con' t) 4Q@riG~ SARI C FIELD NOT&R 135,9865 Acres Being all that certain lot, tract or parcel of land situated in the John McGowan Survey, Abstract Number 797, the B, Lewis Survey, Abstract Number 769, the M.E.P. & P.RR Survey, Abstract Number 950 and the J. Fisher Survey, Abstract Number 421 City of Denton, Denton county, Texas, being part of a certain called 181.92 sore tract described in a deed recorded in Volume 819, Page 268 of the Deed Rbc.ards of Denton County, Texas, being particularly described as followai ONOWING at a 1/2" found iron rod on the east right-of- way line of Lillian Miller Parkway (SO foot right-of-way) from which the northwest corner of said called 181.92 acre tract bears S 69 500250' No 1822.20 feett TNt11CR N 69050125" No 2162.51 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found) T,NIINCE s 00'47134" 6, 306.15 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found; TH=CR N 89'48029" B, 1013.33 feat to a 1/2" iron rod founds THENCE s 00'20124" No 1590.81 feet to a 1/211 iron rod found; THUCR N 8842302511 No 3311.33 feet to a 1/2" iron rod sett TH1WC1 N 01'04117't W, 82000 feet to a 1/2" iron rod ast; THENCE N 88023125" W, 249.96 feet to a 1/2" iron rod set on the east line of said Lillian Miller Parkway in a curve to the right; TUNCE along the east line of said Lillian Miller Parkway and with the arc of said curve Navinq a radius of 960.00 feet, a central angle of 3030015" whose chord bears N 14 2658" E, 505,09 feet, an arc length of 511.10 feet to a 1/2" iron rod foundl TBSNCN N 29858111" E, 553,02 feet along the east line of said Lillian Miller Parkway to the POIN'P OF BNOINNIIM and containing approximately 135.9865 acres of land. Page 4 of 4 m x ~endaNa.~ EXHIBIT "B" SUGGESTED PLANT LIST Date°dalte ;(3c The following Plant list was compiled by the Palks and Recreation Department and represents species which have proven succMful and compatible with Penton soils. TTlis list is not intended CO be all inclusive, bul rather as a guide for those not familiar with this area. COFf>tON" u 1C NAAIR MTAQUM lm1aJ3>,' ~ EXPOS CANOPY TREES MOW Pidear Piaui clarion X Flowertal 2w Sus Pyna alkryann vu, said Cyproy %radrurd"arihtocral• !e Tuodium dblichum 4W Sue maple Barth Aar grandidenulum so M Sue Bun Oak Quercw macroarpa !e' 30' Sun Aon barbalum wr, addo d!, 41S, Sue Cod" C'~ Elm Ulmus crualrals 6w 40 Sua C7afagwpfe Oak d! Quemr muchlenberaii sly Sun SWUM Red cedar 6a' Se SuMaA slide JuNpeAh virgisiay Japanese Bkri Pine Phan Ihunbegil x w $um Laeetrrh FJm lJtmus paMrdis x !d Se' Sw Ouse Onnge, thorn and rrulttaa Araclun pomHerm 'brio' es' 35- Sue ' Ooidam Rata Tree. Kodreuleru pmaialala sr so' Pan shade G" Itl;noemh w Sum ShuaurN Oak Quereus shumardi ae' de' Sun Semlhern lJ+e Oak Quercus Virginians fie' !e' sue Swwjum Tama Red oak Ileiuldamber asy~pnty x w Sun Query WON 10 UWPAM shade Western Sapbersy Sapindw drummondp 40 10' Sua eC V SuMaA Shade Cape Mynk UNDERST IRY TRM Canners P&asap Red Cedar [Arerlroemis India Juni m' te' Sun 0"0014 Harty (PaaumMw) Ikt Mrginlana 'anaenil' X 21' U Sum seam W41M decidua x is, Chitopsim linnAa la SurAhade Eve's Nxklats m' t!' Sum ue 'FbMerinl Cnhappk Sop" Itrlnla Males AyhAda u' m' SulSbade Fleaersng Pr ch Was p Wds 2a 21 Sum Prunus Madow Buckeye 1s' is, Sum .Mahan Plum ungnwi, specieu Prunes madam 27 m' SwNshadn 'oklahoma, Of Madera RedLud Cercla anadensis vet, laensla 25. SuyShade WUAIYAk 'oils homm' of 'medana' Myrla admen u' Sue Y.uprn Hay not wmilods x Is' 10' surowl shade ChIIR4k Pnainu Phollnis aenvists x lS' Is, Sunshade Pater Holy tkr alteawla 1S' tY Sakshade x t!' l0 SurAhsde A rr Otaay 'Edward SURUBS M Agadist ac Abelie a grandinere x s, Mahonla Irifaiolau 4' SYMaA Shade AJahp (Rohe or Sharon) Hibiaew ayaiacw X 4' SuMaA Shade x to, r snNShadc Page l of 2 ~enJaNo ~ ~ EXHIBIT °B" (Con'[) Agondallefl Q?MMON MAMA KRICIMC NAMA UWAGRFt FJ_IC,kff W 1 le Bar" BarbeM thunbergil 'atropurrurea' 6' e' SuNShadc Barberry, Crimson Pygmy Berbens ihunberild 'crimson 2' 3' SwNshadc pygmy Burford Holy, Dwarf 11a cornuu 'burfordil naps' X 7' 6' SY%Shade Chinese Holly, Dwarf Ila cornuu'rotunda' x S' 3' SumShsde Elaalinus, SiNerberry Elaalinw s ebbinget x T 9' Sun/PaR Shade Flamelar Euonymus'Red Haas' Euonymua atata compacu 1' Sun/Part Shade Fosler's Holy lla a allenusts'foaleri' x ll' 17 SuNShade Flowering Quince CMeaameles Japonlcs S' 6' SurAhade Forsythia Forsynthia a Inicrated'u 6' S' Suntan Shades Hollywood Juniper Junlperus chlnensis var. Yoruloss' X SC S' Sun Mary Nell Holy Bas cv.'Maty Nell' X i3' to, SunrShade Nssdias, Compaot Nandioa domestics 'oompaeu' X S. 6' SuftA ude Nana Nandias Nondins domestics 'mats' X 3' 2' Sun3hade Nellie R. Stevens Holy Ike cv, 'Nellie R. Stevens' X IS' If' SuNShsde Psmpu or m Conaderls aelloatu Sus Phodnis, Frootes Pbotinu a frueeri x 12' V SuoArt Shade Pfluer Juniper Junlpenu chlnenals var.'pritace x 6' Sus Spina Vanhoulte Spirits Ivanhoulld S' Suw?art Shade Shore Juniper Juntnerw oonferu x 1' 6' Sun Yoopon Holly, Dwarf na vomsriris'nans' X 3' Suohade OROTUND COVER Asiatic Jasmine Trscheloapermum asisticum x 6' 7 Sunshade Creeping Juniper Junlperus bodsonulie x 13' 6' Sun Dwarf PeNwuhu Vincs minor x 64 a' Shade E 06h Ivy Heders belu x too 1' Shade Orly SanroUss Ssntoliru chamaegparissus X 13' Y Stun Harcysuckk, Japanese Purple Lonicers Japooln 'purpurp' X Ir V Sun/Pan Shade Llriope LJdope muscsrl x 13' 1' SuNShade Mondo Oman Ophlopogon Japonicas x C 1' Shade Japanese Oardes Jumper Juniperus proevmiens 'una' X r 3' Sun VINES Bala Ivy Psnhenocissus tricuspidau 26' SunAbode Carolina Jesumine Gebemium 6emperNrtn x l3' Sun Chlnae WWau WWau dneruls 23' Suntan Shade Coral Honeysuckle Lonletn krope virm x IS' Sus Cron Vine B SMOill cspreauu x 111' Sumpan Shade English by Heelers bdlx x 63' Shade Wy Bantau Rose Rau banksiae 12' Sun Swat Autumn Qemslis Ckmalis panicuuu IS' SWrAhade Trumpet Creeper Co psis I ugliabuans 'eudame 2S' Sutupart Shade Islen' Virginia Creeper Panhenocissw qulnquefola 25' Sunshade CRIlK IVRF Bermuda or am Sun Buffaab Ones sun St. Augustine Orsm SuNShade Ti a Fescue x Shade Page 2 of 2 Tir CITY COUNCIL Mii 4 a ~ s e tite w t `4~0 °tloer'scaa~°° r AQendaNo. W-9.26- DATE Aaendalte : July 6, 19930Me 1 REPORT TOt Mayor and members of the City Council FROMt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: FINAL REPLAT OF THE EASTERN HALF OF LOT 7 AND ALL OF LOT 80 BLOCK 30 WATTAM ADDITION: INTO LOT 8R. $ECOMMENDATION: The Planning & Zoning commission recommended approval by a 6-0 vote, at its June 9, 1993 meeting. SUMMAR i The .758 acre site is located at the northwest corner of Collins and Welch Streets. Both streets are improved so no further paving is required; but sidewalks will be constructed along Collins and Welch Streets. Standard curbing will need to be dowelled into the existing laydown curb and standard drive approaches need to be built. There is an 8 inch water line available on Collins and a 6 inch line available on Neff. There also is a 6 inch sanitary sewer line on Welch street currently used by the building, and a 6 inch on Collins; however, the line on Collins is currently overloaded. There is an existing fire hydrant at the corner of Neff and Collins. Fire flow is more than adequate for the proposed development. BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing to remove the existing residential dwelling and utilize this area for additional parking. No expansion of the larger structure is being proposed. This property was zoned PD with an approved detailed plan on April 6, 1993. Prior to that it was zoned single-family (SF- 7). Council approved a preliminary plat on April 6, 1993. Being a "residential" replat, a pu')lie hearing is required. In advance of tonight's hearing, 23 notices were mailed to affected property owners. The final replat conforms to the ~gendeMo. ~ ~ Agend 11 l I)Ate 00 minimum requirements of the subdivision and Land DevelopmenC Regulationsr Chapter 14 of the Code of ordinances. PROGRAMS. DEPARTMENTS OR-GROUPS AFFECTEj?7 Applicant, U. of North Texas FISCAL IMPACTI None Respectfully submitted) *Llyd Prepared: Harrell ager 0. Owen Y , SLA Urban Planner Approved) c/ rank . Robb ns, AICP Executive Director Planning and Development ATTACHMENTSs 1. Location Map. 2. Final Plat. 3. PD Detailed Plan. AXX00312 i ~~da No C j' " ( ~ ATTACHMENT 1 3Bdndl~t # C LOCATION MAP ~tP P-93.020 Wattam Addition NORTH Qo ®D©C]~]C~ OC a a Q C awr a p©~~~0~❑ 0~ 'N ` N. a~K ~ ©CJ N w. HICKORY a®~ d,I 0® on C sr Oct QQ D aq oao C y wnT et ~IS ML kW o D Location Map Dale: 6/3/93 Scale: None o- ® N AM of M RAMADA, STATI M MAN AS ♦~MW/ y~y LM,ITY or Dinum At f. IN DYV "ld~'$~IY M DTT7R,1,1N;11 :h'nn "Fit"s WS. SEW MI "alrl C MN&TIW or EARN WAR, AVr Us Ill, „ TIA ii103R 02M~TIO IN "I 1uGL11 P CU HALSRJ PASCAL (F U;IMACT " 111, lH "a Cln 01 DAITOM, DLVHW to In,, VAN,, MD VINO A, 01 , M Lot I MD US WT I I I ON LOT 1 ILOCA 1 Or No NATtM ADDIM To "I CITY, W n x AI /HU1M IV +NR "I AfrWLFD IN VOLVNI 11 Y V' I III RSol TW Mm DAI'outRliio IIN A also II OD RLDIIi or TWA r DMJPCH M CHIIIT AT DinoM, Ar I;1 PILLNAHq ClIn" Of CXU1T EYE ~I SIVA NI "of "MIA77MI D1 "11H TIAAS N M Try DIY of • ' IOOIJ;IO 1dl UN 16" D~Y ROV APRIL, CAN" LEW REAL A PAOPLRY, SSiMpM 1V APPL JpLI"Lm"1W/COIMTY, MA/, MD 611104 MRI PAATICvwLY NIC111" At rJL IAal"IMD AT M Ixom IN Ar ptw Wr COM" Dr LOT 1, AWN F I 1 I I iTn DOlrml "I" LXr or COLLI NO {M1trt AND Mt "AT L191 Of VILCA WCwrr AGI r 1WINCI IOVT" 16 DlGrttl 11 MIAMI AD nod D1 VAN? SLOWED No II MATH Plan IF WAY OF MLLIM/ MAR A D7ATA"Cf OP 161.71 fin To M LAN PIN, "Oct MAT" do Draltts 00 woos 10 {ICNos WANT A DIItM01 of 10111 PART TO AN ANN 'IN 1" TO MAIN LIMN Or LOT 11 101 1 0~ Lot I T"MC1 NN':N 11 "NoM lA MtMVM 00 49"" III? I DIITINCR or 1 111.71 TINT TOM IMN PIN AT tHI "IN WT OaMIA of 1LR 1 SN LOT T QO1~ L;1 Il A TNI M"T Alan of klr or VIVA s"FrT, P 3 rH"CI soU7N ALdO TNi N1T AISW'T of VAY 0/ VfLCN {TS i1TN0 A N 111 OD' 111.11 a DI{1.1M1 « IOL Fill TO fN1 KIWI 0I DtO1MIL" MO COICA1MI Ost Mpg DT LMD. M ID MEN.' W I S Pw rnpirot.l KNOW Mtu MEAN IY T"In PANAMA, w 6 y a ! LOT It nor, Wt. "DOES cM1 XO n Conk] A.IN a MOtTx tlMrr r• l vnr H 11011 ■ ADOPT MI PIILAT DfHNATIMO No NWIM D19Cp WC ~•JLgY LI L011 IJ LOr Is' ILOCR I, VAn4t M011Sd, 41 ADp7 TIN t0 Yyt r:ln 01 Lai DpTJM, uDpTN CNMTY. TCAA%j Mp ON XtMLAY DI.t C.C/ "I TMI L,r r 'Q y b leg rurclc I rOK VIA T"1 STAR" tlar V-VAYI 00 e.awrl AS ro IXD"X "[FROM. e Lb C K a 1 ' LOT OR 61 eORKRATION Or 0 /ey ACJ/ all HAAS n Ir. nr I. xlxrcNl, n. neuptNT . V a lGnI N111. 1' N ITATI DT TI"AA AS MIT( of IRWIN! AA 1 4W_~(~ 3 !tTTOP. ".IN DI"IDOSIGNIDLAYID'AI INDMIAION Ohio7-OLIVER, m, I .r / IA tIIDAn or IrJIA MI "WIN Com At LN or "OATH WAS. SW7NY" A PEA" AND or Ell , Iqy TD No To It AlaD:"YINS"UMn, "D ACMOV 1MILD NOR :1 TO M THAT DM/RNOR UR hT pT M•IMNIAII +0THI ACT 0 "At Of A Ilso {D NEW MCHI i As no ADCIT CORPORATION MN~TIolTLX l AM COf.lffVS STREET "I PUNKIN AND "11DIPATINA THINII" "PINIONS AMD IM TIN <AIACI tY MINA" ITATtOl W door or RA, _ 01400 IMDO M XMD AND 1dL or OffltN THIS -CAI 01 IS PAOCI A tLDDN ID ROCI 1 A Lx 1StAL1 xRl4 D/ A00iIIoM ~ ~MILIHD/ A WAPIAN //DN r0l I, N 'J J, , rM "I" OECD R/A. N 11 r t PUBLIC. PMAPY mm6 Rim or way-- wY COMn11N "Plots, qL Ir p"yC A N YN AtI s 47My. if+eMroNrpM EMd TNIII AD Np IY "all r11NtMT{I Iiii wljp=Newt GNAT, 1, Wt W. HAMI T. IROISTRPID PAOf LSSINAL LMD IVIVII Col AACC.CMArl Y/MVAYI Or M THAT LWD" AND RRSNOT "IN THI I"MON RA PIMA "O NAMIL N t"RA WIPA PLAM "Do Art PIP "At IUnMv IfIN TM ACIMIDWI NIT% "OlmucLS or UP City of to,". MAI, 1 i_ 1 1 7 f f ~ #AAPWC RISEN 'FMH 6. bwR UA,C 1i"Y'IDO' PCD~R'dI QYY ObBASDGe BPICI WATTAM I PIxIL Rthe " oA+1 I10l6,041 cHb n, CON{UMNy [NOME" L SURVIVORS 01 yR el N y nI~A~1tn11 or w~lr 9r~br r wNb Rr e•+4 •Itfy Y. 0 M O1i RA ?60 Pet 11e f ti AI, IN ox to e+, H Caw Tr ,bt w 21 i F } Lor 2 Lor I ooaNo c 3 ATTACHMENT 3 ~ , a119. I N 69' 44' (V. E J6J.23' p'i " r afore wona ! afro o r .ow wrn.~ roar ,u C IMJaf AQgY I ~ I r~Rrifq! nl ~ r I I I ~ b~ ro rpE L4[ ' roRn"A r AgK ~0 r,sr rR cur 0 I ~o K ~ro v 43, -4- 0 I I I I \ o e~ " r kq L 7 L.Ur I \ . rf1 rRofCsm GRAss \ r ~s f In, n1.sf.~ r.r I p~~ o 0 ! ~ as ■c j a f o s iaR r Me slROf+s \ lsursovARerrfcr I ~ ~ b PROPOSED MEcw HALL = `14 + W PROPOWD kW MrtfA s r r O I AW J. OF o 91 _ v of o -1 to S-L AWOAU r mwv .u, r ar O«r W PAY ao• w 161.2s' „DWOJO ~2a rw ra • nor ON KV Wt= !0' keW Qr WAY if aSMft r 11 vtvC _ Wattam Addition CTA~ T Detail plan b i ~c~dako. Minutes Planning t zoning commission Gf1~ June 9, 1993 Page 2 Mr. Glasscock recommended approval of the preliminary and final replats of Lot 4, Block A of the Minter Addition, plus 3,36 acres of unplatted lands into Lot 4R, Block A, Ms, Flemming seconded, Dr. Huey said she did not see the distinction between the old and the revised plat, Mr. Yost said that the old plat showed only Lot 40 now they are adding a new lot creating one lot called 4R, The motion carried unanimously (6-0), III. Hold public hearing and consider the final plat h Lot er Block 3 of the Wottam Addition, Being a repeat of the eastern half of Lot 7 and all of Lot e, Chairman Engelbrecht opened the public hearing. STAFF REPORTS by Owen Yost. The site is ,758 acres locatad at the northwest corner of Collins and Welch street, There is a vacant structure located on the side that has been used for a grocery store and a church. The use being proposed is for a fraternity meeting hall. Twenty three property owners were notified and no replies were received. Since the property is almost completely surrounded by lay-down curb, curbing will need to be dowelled into the existing curb and standard drive approaches will need to be established. The fire flow for the area is more than adequate for the proposed development. The property was zoned PD with an approved detailed plan on April 6, 1993. Counoil approved the preliminary 1993, The applicant wants to remove the exists g residential dwelling and utilize the space for additional parking, The final t conforms to the Subdivi on and Land Development iRegulatiopsj Chapter 34tof the Code of Ordinances. RECOKti ENDATIONs The Development Review Committee recommended approval Present to speak in favors none Present to speak in oppositions none Public hearing was closed, Mr. Glass comnended 8R, Blockc3cofrthe Wattam approval of Bethe ing iaareplat of tho A ageode Na 4peoda'b Wo Minutes I Planning i Zoning Commission 7~ June 9, 1993 Page 3 eastern half of Lot 7 and all of Lot Mr. Cooper seconded and the motion carried unanimously (6-o), IV. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning from the Planned Development district No. 191 a 4.71 acre tract to the Office district with conditions on property located on the east aide of Lillian Miller, directly across from the '{T" intersection of Teasley Lane and Lillian Millers a 4.71 acre tract to single Family 16 just north of the 4,71 acre tracts and, a 16.2 acre tract to SF-16 located at the northwest corner of Lillian Miller and Teasley Lane. STAFF REPORTS by Frank Robbins Mr, Robbins reported that the case was a Substantial down zoning from PD 19 to SF 16. The previous approved planned development was known as Dimension. The applicant has requested rezoning from Planned Development District No, 19 tot West side of Lillian Miller north of Teasley - a 16,2 acre tracts SF-16. On the east side of Lillian Miller and Teasley, north of the "T" intersection - 4.706 acres to office district with conditions, 136 acres to SF-16, The case will be the largest decrease in intensity trips in five years. The area shown as general retail on the previous plan would be down zoned and staff has recommended conditions. The applicant amended the proposal so that all of the land will be SF-16 except 4 plus acres that would be zoned office. Dr. Huey asked if the amendment called for neighborhood services or office zoning, Mr. Robbins said the amendment was asking for office and SF- 16. There would be 3 separate office zoned lots, the entire tract would be SF16. A church has shown interest in one lot. The church would be allowed in all SF-16 zoning districts. accordance The intensity principal allocation iafter the rezoning would be under the allowed allocation by 4,723 trips. Staff has propossd buffering conditions. The applicant would at a later date have the opportunity to decide i dedication f they want to apply for or participate in our voluntary park participate, However, there is no recommended p to participate in park land dedication. Neighborhood associations have had input and positive remarks on the downzoning, The city policy i i CITV, COUNCIL ULU miff 4~ of 6 _ toll 91m~~ ~pende Mo. - apeRdol /J Date DATE; July 6, 1993 j0 _C7 CITY COUNCIL REPORT b TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, city Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY AND FINAL REPLATS OF LOT 41 BLACK A OF THE MINTER ADDITION, PLUS APPROXIMATELY 3,36 ACRES OF UNPLATTED LAND, INTO LOT 4R, BLOCK A. RECOMMENDATION; The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, with a 6-0 vote at a June 9, 1993 public hearing, If a landowner is opposed to consideration, staff recom- mends that Council again postpone consideration. SUMMARY: The 3.589 acre site is at the northern terminus of Newton Street, and is traversed by Pecan Creek. There are no public improvements with this replat. The site is currently vacant, and is proposed for a single- family residence. The landowner to the south, Alico Distributors, in conjunc- tion with the Denton Independent School District, will landscape the area between their property and the newly- created lot, in accordance with ordinance 92-132, BACKGROUND; This item was on Council agenda of June 15, 1993. DISD opposed consideration until they had sold Lot 4. Council postponed consideration. As of this writing, all the land is not under one ownership. One landowner is currently opposed to Council consideration, while the other is insistent on its being placed on the agenda. Mr. Hudspeth told staff on June 29th that DISD and he would close before July 6th. The current Minter Addition was created by a replat (including Lot 4) in 1992. Lot 4 was rezoned to SF-7, and the configuration of PD-26 was modified. The unplatted portion of this plat is zoned MF-1. PAGE 1 ti]. G a spW s No. apendalt L_ . City services and facilities, including water, sanitary do, FF, sewer, electrical, and solid waste, are available to lot 4R. The replats conform to the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development Regulationst Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR Rnna AFFECT D; Denton Independent school District. FISCAL IMPACT; None, Respectfu ly submitt d: Prepared by: Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager G. Owen Yost, ASLA Urban Planner Approved: r4.k Rob i n s s AICP Executive Director Planning and Development 8MO1ENTS., 1. Location map, 2. Preliminary replat. 3. Final replat. 4. Portion of ordinance 92-132. 56 PS2 minutes. AXX00394 PAGE 2 7. a ti AganOaNa ATTACHMENT 1 A~enddlt 1 ? L .'•93.417 oele _f r, NORTH '1:6}oi onw rworMt 4 n~ ADD i0 d F. M. 426 d ❑ Ma Q SrrE T PURI t tsr RS A K! VISTA A S DR. hte 3/26/43 Sales Noce N if VendaNo 7-~1 << Agendalte t mi- - 93.417 ATTACHMENT 2 Dole V NORTH NORTH FORTH WORTH BANK 1199/P 203 tON4'Lf-C :Ff as S`L'OT 4R ' < ss 10'f+K iLrLl :w,) ;AY, et ux uwr. flrirfo '1+~,+trcc + % V 714 'P 373 !4 } c6mT.facllaflf +oi r+~ 5 1 1•iaa o ~ w b96~ t c LOCKS. 3.5~ " sow6 Af 1 V-3U6 P.Y.4yp PIN aw to . $10 00#443.47 APAOY LOCAntA Z}% e. f v 11v.. 100.s~ a ` +►.r a 1ite' ~ i l0~66'Oar t ~ 7,00 .c.c.' ns~~C►~+. rar ti OT 4 ra. u• K~rlt~ i~• ii laW* i ; Um Eardm? LOT 3 Zoo Io-t` LOT 2 Ito S/18,P93 Scala Node Agaflda No. AgoctaItam ~-93.017 ATTACHMENT 3 Date 5,1 NORTH ,99 P X0,3 I; )HrN C, GAY, et ax `LOT 4 R__ ~`~0'lAw, lErE~ \ ('MI. !q/TSO -~DRaIN40E 10'sm SEMLR t\, 7:4;'P 378 y! ElMT CS MT.` k[01D9s6 'aq r+i g BLOCK A 3.589 AcRFS J+ C.J. HUDSPETH SWEATMAN V,3266 P,317 'are )x.LouTiow ' L P c$WTAOC 1 = ` EC[V.• t9 - S.E,4•.S1SC0 SY~,\,J~i M a 66.55'03' t itao ta7oo , y- i+ e~•~x~ taa.sst ~'r.~ ~OT- 30.00' --16' 'd I !r #44459. 1 356 39' 6ENENAL LOT 3 LOT 2 UTIL, EASEMENT . ! BLOCK A MINTER ADDN, Fldal Replat Wal S/1"3 Scale: None r Agendale ~ ~ ~ V ' Date ATTACHMENT 4 G C WHEREAS, the y Court.._ be in compliance with the Denton Devb,.,,._ THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINSI SECTION I: That the zoning district classification and use designation of the 0.278 acres of land described in Exhibit At at- tached to and incorporated into this ordinance by reference, is changed from Single Family 7 (SF-7) to Planned Development (PD) zoning district classification and use designation with conditions der the comprehensive zoning ordinance of the City of Denton, ~?scas, and shall be added to and included in Planned Development ,o. 26. -A copy of the amended property boundaries for Planned De- velopment No. 26 is attached hereto in Exhibit B and made a part hereof. SECTION II. That in accordance with Division 5 of Chapter 35 of the Code of ordinances of the City of Denton, the property shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions and allowed uses contained in ordi- nance No. 80-61 a copy of which in attached hereto in Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference shall be applicable'to this 0.278 acre tract of landl and 2. In the event any protected tree is removed from the property, each protected tree removed shall be replaced with four (4) canopy trees (2-inch caliper minimun) to be planted as approved by the Planning and Development De- partment of the City of Denton. ^r^mT^" TTT nh%+ +h& rl+v►a official zonina mac is amended e F r Agenda No 43x;XJ ATTACHMENT 5 Agendalfe S MINUTES Planning and Zoni g Commission 'rC June 9, 1993 The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Denton, Texas will be held on Wednesday, June 9, 19930 and will begin at 5:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, E, McKinney. 215 Present from p&Z: Chairman Engelbrecht, Katie Flemming, Mary Evelyn Huey, Ivan Glasscock, and Melvin Willis, and Richard Cooper. Absent from P&Zt Mike Cochran Present from Stafft Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning and Developments Owen Yost, Urban Planner; Mike Bucek, Assistant City Attorneys Lloyd Harrell, City Managers David Salmon, Senior City Engineer= Robbie Baughman, Deputy Building Official, Cindy Cranford, Secretary Chairman Eagelbrecht called the meeting to order at 5t15 p.m. I. Consider the approval of the minutes of May 26, 1993. Dr. Huey moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of May 26, 1993 as amended, Mr. Glasscock seconded and the motion carried unanimous 5-0. Mr. Cooper was not present for the vote. He came in at 5:20. II. Consider the preliminary anca final replats of tot 4, Block A of the Minter Addition plus 3.336 acres of unplatted land= Into Lot 4R. STAFF REPORT; by Owen Yost Mr. Yost reported the 3.589 acre site is located at the northern terminus of Newton Street, and is traversed by Pecan Creek. There would be no public improvements with this replat. The site is currently vacant, and is proposed for a single- family residence. The Minter Addition was created by a replat (including Lot 4) in 1992. It was simultaneously rezoned to SF-7, and the configuration of PO-26 was modified. The unplatted portion north of Lot 4 is Zoned MP-1. City services are available, The landowner to the south, Alico Distributors, in conjunction with the Denton Independent School District, will landscape the area between their property and the newly-created accordance with Ordinance 92-132, The replate conformlto~the minimum requirements of the Subdivision and Land Development begreviewed$ 34 o the Code of tion from Ordinances. the Commission, at They will a public hearing before the City Council on July 6, 1993. w ApendaNo AgenCalte L flee T) - Mr. Glasscock recommended approval of the preliminary andx C' final replats of Lot 4, Block A of the Minter Addition, plus 3.36 acres of unplatted land; into Lot 4R, Block A, Ms. Flemming seconded. Dr. Huey said did not see the distinction botween the old and the revised plat. Mr. Yost said that the old plat showed only Lot 4, now they are adding a new lot into one lot called 4R. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). III. Hold public hearing and consider the final plat of Lot OR, Block 3 of the Wattam Addition. Being a replat of the eastern half of Lot 7 and all of Lot S. Chairman Engelbrecht opened the public hearing. STAFF REPORTr by Owen Yost. The site is .758 acres located at the northwest corner of Collins and Welch street. There is a vacant structure located on the side that has been used for a grocery store and a church if is being proposed for a fraternity meeting hall. Twenty three property owners were notified and no replies were received. Since the property is almost completely surrounded by lay-down curb, curbing will need to be dowelled into the existing curb and standard drive approaches will need to be established. The fire flow for the area is more than adequate for the proposed development. The property was zoned PD with an approved detailed plan on April 6, 1993. Council approved the preliminary plat on April 6, 1993 The applicant wants to remove the existing residential dwelling and utilize the space for additional parking. The final replat conforms to the minimum requirements of the subdivision and Land Development Regulations) Chapter 34 of the Code of Ordinances. RECOMMENDATIONS The Development Review Committee recommended approval Present to speak in favor: none Present to speak in oppositions no Public hearing was closed. Mr. Glasscock recommended approval of the final plat of Lot OR, Block 3 of the Wattam Addition. Being a replat of the eastern half of Lot 7 and all of Lot 8. Mr. Cooper seconded and the motion carried unanimously (6-0). IV. Hold a public hearing and consider rezoning from the Planned Development district No. 19s a 4.71 acre tract to the office district with conditions on property located on the east side H4 - CITY COUNCIL hill. 17. p 1 r ODD O i C 0 00 M. t 1 ~ OGG kpe~E~Nc. Apeodalt CITY COUNCIL REPORT Date f c~ 5- i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTi Request from the Sanger Area Chamber of Commerce for an Exemption to the Noise Ordinance for the Pro Youth Rodeo Association on Saturday, July 10, 1993 DATE: July 6, 1993 BACKGROUND: Mr. Gene Truss, Chair of the North Denton Center Neighborhood Association, and Mr. Bob Powers, Vice President of the North Texas State Fair Association, have had a series of good discussions regarding noise issues at the fairgrounds. As the City Council may recall, Mr. Powers' son was to look at the sound system and evaluate it. He has done this and has developed a recommendation to make changes to reduce the sound that goes into the neighborhood. Mr. Powers indicated that these changes will be completed prior the North Texas State Fair and Rodeo in August. SUMMARY: The ordinance declares loudspeakers a noise nuisance, particularly after the hour of 10:00 p.m. (please see copy of ordinance attached). However, the ordinance states that the City Council may make exceptions when the public interest is served. The Sanger Area Chamber of Commerce is requesting an exemption to the noise ordinance on Saturday, July 10, until 12 midnight for the Pro Youth Rodeo Association at the North Texas State Fairgrounds. Ms. Margaret Long, President of the Sanger Area Chamber of Commerce, has requested that it be granted an exemption to the noise ordinance for loudspeakers for the Pro Youth Rodeo Association on Saturday, July 30, until 12 midnight. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTED: North Texas State Fair Association, citizens and visitors attending the rodeo, neighborhoods FISCAL IMPACT: None _ L Venda No 4gandolts rte `Vj'rM~r Please let me know if I can provide additional information. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, L y naHarr 1 City Mager Prepared by: Catherine E. Tuck Administrative Assistant I I ~enda~~o. ~a~ i AgenC~~ S S 93 SANGER AREA HONE 817.156-7702 - A CHAMBER OF COMMERCE P.O, BOX 337 SANGER, TEXAS 76266 June 9, 1993 Denton city council 215 East McKinney St Denton, Texas 762 11 -4229 To Members of the Denton City Council: The Sanger Area Chamber of Commerce respectfully request: an exemption for the use of a loudspeaker for the purpose of conducting a Pro Youth Rodeo Association rodeo at the North Texas State Fairgrounds Arena. ON UNTIL Saturday, July 10, 1993 12:06 Midnight i' r The location is 2217 North Carroll Boulevard, North Texas } r State Fairgrounds. t The Pro Youth Rodeo Association draws contestants from 4 3 years of age to 19 years of age from all over North Texas and Oklahoma. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 1 laot h t Long esident San regrea Ch bemmcrce ML/khI . apendaNo Agendalle r. r Chapter 20 C C, NUISANCES' An. 1. In General, 49 20-1-20-30 Art. It. Abandoned Property, If 20.31-20.70 Div. 1. Generally, 44 20.31-2040 Div. 2. Motor Vehicles, 94 20.41-20.70 Art. 111. Grans and Weeds, H 20.71-20.73 ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec, 20.1, Noise. W It shall be unlawful for any person to make or cause any unreasonably loud, dis• turbing, unnecessary noise which causes or may cause material distress, discomfort or injury to persons of ordinary sensibilities in the immediate %dcinity thereof. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to make or cause anj n:.lse of such character, intensity and continued duration as to substantially interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of private homes by persons of ordinary sensibilities. (c) The following acts, among others, are declared to be noise nuisances In violation of this Code, but such enumeration shall not be deemed to be exclusive; (1) The playing of any phonograph, television, radio or any musical instrument In such manner or with such volume, particularly between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a,m„ as to annoy or disturb the quiet, comfort or repose of persona of ordinary sen- sibilities In any dwelling, hotel or other type or residence; (2) The use of any stationary loudspeaker, ampUor or muoieat instrument In such manner or with such volume as to annoy or disturb persons of ordinary sensibilities in the immediate vicinity thereof, particularly between the, hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., or the, operation of such loudspeaker, amplifier or musical instrument at any time on Sunday; provided, however, that the city council may stake exceptions upon application when the public interest will be, served thereby; (3) The, blowing of any steam whlstle attached to any stationary boiler or the blowing of any other loud or far-reaching steam whistle within the, city limits, except to give notice of the, time, to begin or stop work or as a warning of danger, (4) The erection, excavation, demolition, alteration or repair work an any building at any time other than between the, hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:30 p.m., Monday through 'Cross references-Protected migratory bird roosts declared nuisance,, 16.87; inspection and abatement warrants, 119-86 at seq.; insect and rodent oontml in mobile, home, and rea national vehicle parka, 132-01. Supp. Na. 1 1389 z oendsNo r 4 20.1 DENTON CODE +0pnda fe Saturday; provided, however, that the city council may issue special permits for such work at other hours in case e f urgent necessity and in the interest of public safety and convenience; (5) The creation of any loud and excessive noise In connection with the loading or un- loading of any vehicle or the opening or destruction of bales, boxes, crates or con- tainers; (6) The use of any drum, loudspeaker or other instrument or device for the purpose of attracting attention by the creation of noises to any performance, show, theatre, motion picture house, sale of merchandise or display which causes crowds or people to block or congregate upon the sidewalks or streets near or adjacent thereto. (Code 1966, 44 14.20, 14.21) Croce reference-Animal noise, 116.26. Sec. 20.4. Odors. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to create or cause any unreasonably noxious, unpleasant or strong odor which causes material distress, discomfort or injury to persons of ordinary sensibilities In the immediate vicinity thereof. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to create or cause any odor, stench or smell of such character, strength or continued duration as to substantially interfere with the comfortable t enjoyment of private homes by persons of ordinary sensibilities. (c) The following acts or conditions, among others, are declared to be odor nuisances in violation of this Code, but such enumeration shall not be deemed to be exclusive; (1) Offensive odors from cow lots, hog pens, fowl coops and other s!mllar places where animals are kept or fed which disturb the comfort and repose of persons of ordinary sensibilities, (2) Offensive odors from privies and other similar places; (3) Offensive odors from the use or possession of chemicals or from industrial processes or activities which disturb the comfort and repose of persons of ordinary sensibilities; (4) Offensive odors from smoke from the burning of trash, rubbish, rubber, chemicals or other things or substances; (5) Offeesive odors from stagnant pools allowed to remain on any premises or from rotting garbage, refuse, offal or dead animals on any premises. (Code 1960, H 14.24, 14.23) ' Sec. 20.9. Garbage, trash and rubbish nuisances-Generally. (a) Storing or keeping garbage, trash and rubbish. The storing or keeping of any and all stacks, heaps or piles of old lumber, refuse, junk old cars or machinery or parts thereof, garbage, trash, rubbish, scrsp material, ruins, demolished or partly demolished structures or buildings, piles of bricks or broken rocks on any premises bordering any public street 9upp. No. 1 1390 i f J ~ CITY COUNCIL ~81r bfk 0 IV ~3C~uG a Nom CITY COUNCIL REPORT We_ ` 10 -S TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council FROMi Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECTi Request from the Image One Promotions for an Exemption to the Noise Ordinance for the North Texas Auto Fair on Sunday, July 17, 1993 DATEi July 6, 1993 BACRGROUND3 Mr. Gene Truss, Chair of the North Denton Center Neighborhood Association, and Mr. Bob Powers, Vice President of the North Texas State Fair Association, have had a aeries of good discussions regarding noise issues at the fairgrounds. As the City Council may recall, Mr. Powers' son was to look at the sound system and evaluate it. He has done this and has developed a recommendation to make changes to reduce the sound that goes into the neighborhood. Mr, Powers indicated that these changes will be completed prior the North Texas State Fair and Rodeo in August. SUMMARYI The ordinance declares loudspeakers a noise nuisance, particularly after the hour of MOO p.m. and at any time on Sunday (please see copy of ordinance attached). However, the ordinance states that the City Council may make exceptions when the public interest is served. Larry Everitt, representing Image One Promotions, is requesting an exemption to the noise ordinance for loudspeakers, amplifiers and musical instruments on Sunday, July 17, from 12 noon until 600 p,m, for the North Texas Auto Fair at the North Texas State Fairgrounds. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS, OR GROUPS AFFECTEDI North Texas State Fair Association, citizens and visitors attending the rodeo, neighborhoods FISCAL IMPACT] None i gendaNo. C agenda It ~ Please let me know if I can provide additional Information. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, to Harrell Cit Manager Prepared byi Catherine E. Tuck Administrative Assistant ti a i i• y ~gondnNo.. ~ -p' Apenda~ie Date June 2, 1993 Denton City Council City Of Denton 215 E. McKinney Denton, Texas 76201 Dear Council Members; Image One Promotions and Kdzr Radio are very excited about presenting the North Texas Auto Fair on July 17th and 18th at the North Texr.s State Fa rgrounds. The auto fair will be a family-oriented event featuring music, concessions, exhibits, door prizes, remote control truck racing, and over 400 show vehicles. We would like to request your assistance in granting an exemption for Sun. July le, 1993 (12:00 PM to 6100 PM) for the use of loudspeakers, amplifiers, and musical instruments. We feel that the musical entertainment is a very important component in contributing to the "festive" environment of the North Texas Auto Fair. The auto fair will occupy approximately 909 of the fairgrounds and we are anticipating a turnout of 5000 to 8000 spectators from the north Texas area. Thank you very much for giving our request your consideration. We are thrilled to be bringing the North Texas Auto Fair to Denton, Texas. We look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely-r Larry Everitt Event Chairman IMAGE ONE PROMOTIONS (214) 416-1255 I II t g 4 f aaeedalle ~ ~ Date ' c-`~ Chapter. NUISANCES Art. L In Gecsral, 01120.1-20.30 Art. II. Abandoned Property, if 20.31-2070 Div. 1. Generally, 44 2031-20.40 Div. 2. Motor Vehicles, 44 20.41-2070 Art. M. Grace and Was" it 2071-2073 ARTICLE L IN GENERAL, Sec. 201. Noise. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to make or cause any unreasonably loud, dis• turbing, unnecessary noise which causes or may cause material distress, discomfort or Wury to persons of ordinary sensibilities in the Immediate vicinity thereof. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to make or cause any noise of such character, intensity and continued duration as to substantially Interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of private homes by persons of ordinary sensibilities, (c) The following acts, among others, are declared to be noise nuisances in violation of this Code, but such enumeration shall not be deemed to be exclusive: (1) The playing of any phonograph, television, radio or any musical instrument In such manner or with such volume, particularly between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7M a.m., as to annoy or disturb the quiet, comfort or repose of persons of ordinary sen• sibilities In any dwelling, hotel or other type or residence; (2) The use of any stationary loudspeaker, amplifier or musical Instrument in such manner or with such volume as to annoy or disturb persons of ordinary sensibilities In the immediate vicinity thereof, particularly between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., or the operation of ouch loudspeaker, amplifier or musical Instrument at any time on Sunday', provided, however, that the city cou-,cil may make exceptions upon application whet the public interest will be served thereby; {3) The blowin` of any steam whistle attached to any stationary boller or the blowing of any other loud or far-reaching steam whistle within the city limib, except to give notice of the time to basin or stop work or as a warning of danger, (4) The erection, excavation, demolition, alteration or repair workon any building at any time other than between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:30 p.m., Monday through 'Cron rderenew-Protected migratory bird roots declared nuisance, 16.67; inspection and abatement warrants, 110-86 at seq.; insect and rodent control in mobile home and roes reational vehicle parks, 132.91. Supp. No. 1 1389 k c 5 AgeodaNo 4 20 1 DENTON CODE Apendaliem , rJ . 1b19 Saturday; provided, however, that the city council may Issuespecial permits 1:.) work at other hours In case of urgent necessity and in the intereest ofp blic safety and convenience; 15) The creation of any loud and excessive noise in connection with the loading or un- loading of any vehicle or the opening or destruction of bales, boxes, crates or con- tainers; (6) The use of any drum, loudspeaker or other Instrument or device for the purpose of attracting attention by the creation of noises to any performance, show, theatre, motion picture house, We of merchandise or display which causes crowds or people to block or congregate upon the sidewalks or streets near or adjacent thereto. (Code 1966,1114-20, 14.21) Cruss reference-Animal noise, 0 6.26. Sec. 20.2. Odors. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to create or cause any unreasonably noxious, unpleasant or strong odor which causes materfid distress, discomfort or injury to persons of ordinary sensibilities in the immediate vicinity thereof. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to create or cause any odor, stench or smell of such character, strength or continued duration as to substantially interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of private homes by persons of ordinruy sensibilities. (c) The following acts or conditions, among others, are declared to be odor nuisances in violation of this Code, but such enumeration shtdl not be deemed to be exclusive: (1) Offensive odors from cow lots, hog pens, fowl coops and other simllar places where animals are kept or fed which disturb the comfort and repose of persons of ordinary sensibilities; (2) Offensive odors from privies and other similar placer, (3) Offensive odors from the use or possession of chemicals or from industrial processes or activities which disturb the comfort and repose of persons of ordinary sensibilities; (4) Offensive odors from smoke from the burning of trash, rubbish, rubber, chemicals or other things or substances; (5) Offensive odors from stagnant pools allowed to remain on any premises or from rotting garbage, refuse, offal or dead animals on any premises, (Code 1900, if 14.29, I493) Sec. 20.9. Oarbegr, trash and rubbish nuisances -Osnorally, (a) Storing or herpin j garbage, trash and rubbish. The storing or keeping of any and all stacks, heaps or piles of old lumber, refuse, funk, old cars or machinery or parts thereof, garbage, trash, rubbish, scrap material, ruins, demolished or partly demolished structures or buildings, piles of stones, bricks or broken rocks on any premises bordering any public street Supp. No. t 1390 I I CITY COUNCIL 0 4QIAd1 N0. ~geMal! CITY COUNCIL REPORT ~e CO-~3 t6-Fs TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager DATE: July 6, 1993 SUBJECT: Street Closing Request for the Fred Douglas Fred Moore School Reunion on July 16, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: To temporarily close Wye Street, from Crosstimber Street to Mill Street, and Crosstimber Street, from Wye Street to Mill Street, on Friday, July 16, from 4:00 p.m, to 8:00 p.m. for a street fair for the Fred Douglas Fred Moore Alumni Association. A map attached indicates the location of this event. SUMMARY: The Fred Douglas Fred Moore Alumni Association is holding its reunion on Friday July 16. Mr. James McDade, representing the group, has requested that the street be closed to provide adequate space and safety for those in attendance. This reunion occurs every three years at this location. The property owners affected by this closure have signed the attached petition with the exception of the resident at 802 Crosstimber. Mr. James McDade indicated that this resident did not want to sign the petition but is not opposed to this event. lie further indicated that residents would be allowed into their property through the barricades. Both the Police Chief and Fire Chief have been advised of this event and have no safety concerns with this temporary street closure. Please advise if I can provide additional information. RESPEC LY SUB I ED, Ll Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Cather ne E. Tuck Administrative Assistant a agenceNo Mtj btwyeht11.r Agenda4e RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING CROSSTIMBER STREET BETWEEN MILL AND WYE STREETS AND WYE STREET BETWEEN CROSSTIMB£R AND MILL STREETS ON FRIDAY, JULY 16, 1993; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, James McDade, representing the Fred Douglas, Fred Moore Reunion, is requesting that a portion of Crosstimber Street between Mill and Wye Streets and Wye Street between Crosstimber and Mill Streets, public streets within the corporate limits of the City of Denton, Texas be temporarily closed to pablir, vehicular traffic between the hours of 4:00 p.m. and 8to0 p.m. on July 16, 1993, for the purpose of having a block party; and WHEREAS, James McDade, representing the Fred Douglas, Fred Moore Reunion, has assured the City that the tenants and property managers in this area have agreed to the temporary closing of these streets and no one will be denied access to their property; and WHEREAS, in order to provide adequate space for the said event and in order to protect the safety of citizens who attend, the City Council of the City of Denton deems it is necessary to temporarily close a portion of Crosstimber Street between Mill and Wye Streets and Wye Street between Crosstimber and Mill Streets from the hours of 4:00 p.m. and 8300 p.m. on Friday, July 16, 19931 NOW, THERE- FORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVESt SECTION i. That Crosstimber Street between Mill and Wye Streets and Wye Street between Crosstimber and Mill Streets, public streets in the corporate limits of the City of Denton, be temporarily closed to vehicular traffic from the hours of 4100 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. on July 16, 1993, for the purpose of having a block party. SECTION iI. That the City Manager shall direct the appropriate city Department to erect barricades at Crosstimber Street and Wye street, at 4300 p.m. and to have the same removed at 8t00 p.m. on said date. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ' aaeadaltem + ~ Late f - , i ATTESTi JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY Sys APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMI DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCN, CITY ATTORNEY r BY: i Page 2 SEE MAP ' ALLE S~IWCR L L AVE. S H1Ll - ~ a LAKEY a 00 OS D °v EXPMIT °v °v ~ 1AiLEY°•~ g ~ S Z o ALEX $ + g o I miswv AgendaNo "C c Apendaitem 6-- ST FOR STREET CLOSURE [late 6"611 t-S Organization Requesting Street Closure:. AieC. at CJT C vt -/o Contact Person: (TAhn'e.5 Address: x'~ o/'",xatle Phone Number: 155 l - ZIP6- G Street To Be Closed: W3 £ 5 f f C ►bss fmli~r Date and Time To Be Closed: TLA I w /ok f~FhT 14d Intersecting Streets: Reason For Closure: S f ee f Fa. r c r Pe i4n Please complete the lower portion of this form. ALL property owners and/or tena>>'_ a affected by the street closure MUST be contacte3 and must sign below with an indication of being in favor or in opposition to the street closure. Name of Propert Owner/ Address Authorise Favor/ Tenant of Proper t Si natur se 1 / l~•~a~ 7, V 2 ran K r+Ju tiD r~,,/~Z 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. AMMOOOFC • CITY COUNCIL MI'M lo: or a~ S • 0 b ~ { O ~QGGGO~ i .N ACM No. I Agenda Ite,rq~62~~ DATE: Da1eJuly 6, 1993 REPORT TO: Mayor and members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF L40TS 1 - 21, BLOCK A, AND LOT 1, BLACK B OF THE HUNTERS RIDGE ADDITION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning & Zoning commission recommended approval, con- ditioned on the satisfactory revision of this document reflecting the proposed land uses, and correction of a sidewalk note. SUMMARY: The 16.205 acre tract is located at the northwest corner of Teasley Ln. and Lillian Miller Pkwy. It is currently undeveloped, and is proposed for use as single-family detached residential lots and a church on Lot 1, Block B. The document revisions which were the subject of the Commission's condition have been satisfactorily accomplished. Public improvements include. • approximately 1323 ft. of street paving. • approximately 4300 feet of concrete sidewalk. • approximately 2100 ft. of 811 water line. • approximately 1700 ft. of 8" sewer line extension. two left turn lanes and median openings. approximately 100 ft. of storm sewer, plus four inlets, along Lillian Miller Rd. five fire hydrants. An 8 ft. wide utility easement has been dedicated along each side of the interior right-of-way. In accordance with the park land dedication, the owner of the property was asked to dedicate land for a park area. The owner declined. It is not known, at this time, if there will be a fee paid in lieu of the park land dedication. oendaNo ,aendali ?Tf BACKGROUND: aC f The current zoning is Planned Development No. 19, designated for cluster home, retail and single-family uses. However, the site is in the process of being rezoned to SF-16. The Citizens Traffic Safety Support commission, on May 17, 1993, granted a variance to the applicant, approving the curb cut location shown on the preliminary plat accessing Lillian Miller from Lot 1, Block B. City services and facilities, including water, sanitary sewer, electrical, and solid waste, are available or planned for. The plat conforms to the minimum requirements of the subdivision and Land Development Regulations; Chapter 34 of the Code of ordinances. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Applicant, users of Lillian Miller Parkway. FISCAL IMPACT: None Respectfully submitted: Prepared: ~ Lloyd V. Harrell g~r~- City Manager G! G. Owen Yost, ASLA Urban Planner Approved: 10 ~4 L Fran H. Robbins, AICP Executive Director Planning and Development ~I r 1 ~-l VeWaNo. VVV" ~gendaftar^ ~ Alt ATTACHMENTS: 1. location map. 2. preliminary plat. 3. P&2 Minutes (6/23/93). AXX003E1 t ~end~No j V ATTACHMENT 1 g8~gdd~Bn? r 1-93-015 Hunter's Ridge pia tl~f,6 NORTH r yQf'~ L ~fQ1f +ouar ' i CL c i woo, D . C J r► 0 SITE W 4% o VICINITY MAP (N T. S) Location Map bate: 5118/93 Scale: None '56. 7 AgendaN agendafl t~em ATTACHMENT 2 ~(t rZ II / afa; Pap s~' p. Pa i / is 19 20 21 `22 23 24 1:-81 20 27 28 w - it J :37. r 1R Mir 114 law ,IS9x I40 110.31 / I 4 0 e 11 ~t 4 5 s`7t 3 6 b 1 / • y laid Auaa a 1 11.20 As. A y CL . R 1 R.ddan2L71S AI. - ` f1 I Late ela / Church Uu - 3.410 Aa 0Y' 1-4411' ' I Ld 17 d 9 a rlr 11 1 ex, .2r •Ta0.9C-- ro=ot- -,DID. ef- e1. d-ar. rrtieeed zm1n/ - Sr 11 AY y s 11 1 \ IpG vc_ - _ Se.rf i= F i 1 t1 it 20 R 21 16 Or 11 1 I I I 13 or Inca, DOW. I 1 e J 14 =I>i S7 e 15 / 7 roCored R! f0' U, 7. k n.9 ' sl e /royyaud Yedfan COS - 0' SIacY and SO' Tranlman 10 I I le /O$/r I 1.3 ver ~ lrru• 1e39 12 a \ 4 a W 0 loo too Joe reel ° W114 DIVA KAMI Me KARNS WOrD 6 C ~ ! n ,ofrer »D Dr 1717- a n3ror • n.lr F4~ 0 2 a 13 14 4 T? r 73,.ix• IS m M,41,w xw mar a Avow r n.er a G 91 b 10enreY 1a,Or in" a s11rw d N7r ~!r 'fS 141 ! b + w 301r4e Iftw ta,r 11790x„•9 we lro. u { 01"0 14r' ti R9 r -JO e 4L f»yyened Drlre Appnaeh GJ r~ I Varfaeca gpptired h V I w Cm " T»IPe safef7 Supperl S R~ P O K CemeLakn on Vep m' 1113. J LOT 1 30' U.4 23' Y.E. R0.R IF a.&R it f Y 11rr~~s.w 11, 111 110.rA id(reeN am f fRiAYlfl l PLAT tA'/1R N r4J'0-lff.77 nr~yr ,10!'o4'Jf f~~' - - -T2ASl7 Lot, F. 21x1 (PO' R.O.Rl)- - - - ---7Fire 1, rs r. aJ' HUNTM 16.20 AM 11 T1a JOHN 71C GOWAN SURVEY 1,-791 . CITY V DWOK DWON COUNTY, TEW G do A Consultants, Inc. M rt, 6m Sawa. Um Work r" 710" IJ, xo ip1. µ • ' ~eM•~ SNtI U4-2134 P nano auee In it De,L 0/10M Sus w w. pia, 93039 i k aeMaNa.C'~ ATTACHMENT 3 erGaf{gmL~.i~.~+ Minutes Planning and Zoning bC, b June 23, 1993 Page 6 Ms. Flemming asked if there would be landscaping. Mr. Johnson said there are a lot of trees and shrubs now. After the units are built, we can go in and check to see if additional landscaping is needed. Public hearing was closed. IN FAVOR: None IN OPPOSITION: None Mr. Glasscock recommended approval of 2-93-012, Mr. Cochran seconded with staff conditions. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). f VI. Consider the preliminary plat of Hunters Ridge Addition, the 16.205 acre site is located a at the northwest corner of Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley Lane. STAFF REPOP.T: Staff report was given by Owen Yost. Mr. Yost said the proposal was for the preliminary plat of lot 1-21 Block A, and Lot 1, Block B of Hunters Ridge Addition. The current zoning is Planned Development 19. The applicant has asked for rezoning to single family 16, and a variance for a curb cut. The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission, on May 170 1993 granted a variance to the applicant, approving the curb cut location shown on the preliminary plat acc,.ssing Lillian Miller from Lot 1, Block S. Utilities are available or planned for. Not shown is an 8 ft easement. T forms to the Subdivision and he plat Land Dev cha to elopment Re ulat r 3 ions p 4 of the Code of ordinances. g : f RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee recommends approval, conditioned on the satisfactory revision of the document reflecting the proposed land use, Mr. Cochran wanted to be reassured there would be sidewalks along Teasley Lane and Lillian Miller and the internal streets j would have sidewalks on both sides. i Mr. Yost said yes, approximately 4300 feet of concrete sidewalk would be installed. Mr. Cochran moved approval of the preliminary plat of Hunters Ridge Addition as recommended by staff. Mr. Cooper seconded the motion, the vote carried unanimously (6-0). VII Consider abandoning a portion of Southmont Drive, being the cul-de-sac at the eastern most end of Southmont. CITY COUNCIL ` Of at, }b o b 4 dlhrO ' 4ti,O ''n/UUQ Agenda No. -3 . Age Item CITY COUNCIL REPORT FORMAT 03;e TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Anproval of a tax refund to Jackie P. Norris, n. RECOMMENDATION: The Tax Department has mailed an Overnavment Letter and an Application for Refund to the taxpayer. All completed forms and necessarv documenta- tion have been returned, requesting this refund, which the Tax Technician recommends. SUMMARY: Chanter 31.11 of the Texas Property Tax Code requires the approval of the governing body of the taxing unit for refunds in excess of $ 500.00. Dr. Norris has requested a refund in the amount of $ 1,206.78 because he overpaid his account #075136. BACKGROUND: Dr. Norris made a payment of $ 1,206.78 on December 29, 1992 and his mortgage company made a payment of $ 1,206.78 on January 7, 1993 against a tax base of $ 1,206.78. A tax refund is due. PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: The Tax Department and the tax account of Jackie F. Norris, N.D. FISCAL IMPACT: 1,206.78 RESP UL 1.Y S B ITTED: j 11 loy Harrell City Manager Prepared by: ame Vic Schneider Title Tax Technician Approved: ~r ame kI Je Person Title surer 1633C/3 `s at.,. r, sends No C p~dAra ~TTax 311ro(~,et) APPLICATION FOR TAX REFUND «aendal)e Collecting Office Name;, X70 t Collecting Tax For: ax np nits) Address City, Stale, Zip Code In order to apply for a tax refund, the following Information must be provided by the taxpayer. IDENTIFICATION OF PROPS TY 0 NER: Name: __JR.CKLE. ~U vis /3t.7J. Address: ocL.W 11-15 !',RCitF iuroau~ Tv 7b s- 5 Z Telephone Number (if additional Information is needed): IDENTIFICATION OF PROP RTY: Description of Property: - o ref r Tv je.SfC BcOC Ae 1-07- Address or Location of Property. c v /cc LQ r Z t,~ire,u- '7't Account Number of Property. or Tax Receipt Number: INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF TAXES: Name of Taxing Una Year for Amount of From Which Refund Which Refund Date of the Amount of Tax Rotund Is Requested Is Requested Tax Payment Taxes Paid Requested 1~/rY os= A. 9A d2 s 2. ;I as ? urod -M-/ 19 Y2- $ /x06.78 $ _ AZ46. 9b~ Y 19 /=7 / 19 .Q._ $ (0L02 $ 3. 19 / 19 _ $ $ Taxpayers reason for refund (attach supporting documentation):1 XPAYF,E AN dk TM,4,* 6 -G2__f,4C14- 40 7-9*. TAKt3 DV TMIS Qkb,QrerY. 1~R IV6,2k43 /s &tx) ietz?u sr/N4 A- RfF2tA)D Df N/S DUCA ah ply for th t th - Informaton I have given on this form correct" to % 3 Signature Date of Application for Tax Refund DETERMINATION FOR TAX REFUND: Approval Disapproval Signature of Authorized Officer Date Signature of Presiding Officer(s) of Taxing Date unit(s) for refund applications over $500 Any person who makes a kites entry upon the foregoing record shaft be sub)ect loom of the follo" Pena"; 1, impe4owenl of not more Than 10 years nor less than 2 years and/or a me of not more than Sill or both such fine and Imprisonment 2, confinement In W for a term up to 1 year or a fine not to exceed $2,000 or both such fine and imprisonment es set forth In Section 37.10, Penh Code, REFUND Et 11 I ICI 4 ,,ad o C. l~ JACKIE R. NORRIS, M,D. 166 `I: 29 ADRIENNE NORRIS PH. BUS, 017.560.2242 36 ROLUNO HrLLS CIR, PH. W7.56&1502 1)1' DENTON,1E1fA5 76205 Y DOLLARS I First Gibraltar Bank, FSB ~hxerin0 Otfioe.iCe • Oal1u, Tau - laecba Suk / I Noo ► cz{_,it U S13 (c p~vvd 1 0:3 L L093 L 204 29 L9 3 Lml 38ow L4mov 2`0000 L 206481' i L4 41 m cc 5 ~o3 VJ n W W I. W YY. ~ } W -"*12 0302 ;02220 0 r w a REPORT FIOR05OW 06/23/93 AT 21 00 O V E A P A Y M E N T 5 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO. RECEIPT NO. NAME ADDRESS AMOUNT STATUS OF PAYMENT 08217400000 92105/01-0507 FOLSTADT, ROBERT H SR STUN VIDA E MCKINNEY ST 30.00 OVERPAY 02730900000 92105/02.0150 KNICHI , BILLY M RIOGECREST CA 43.53 OVERPAY 03078100000 92/05103-0328 at DNA A, LAOISLAV F CRAIG LN 423.97 OVERPAY 03141300000 92/06103.0452 POWELL, JAMES D CACTUS CA 374.14 OVERPAY 02249100000 91106108-0025 LIPSE Y, JOE P BELLEME4D OR 4.50 OVERPAY 03329500000 92106115.0007 HOUSTON, FRED W PRAIRIE DR 0.10 OVERPAY 08250100000 92/06/16-0018 MITCHELL, BRUCE M HIGHLAND PARK 0.01 OVERPAY 10878900000 92/06119-0002 THOMPSON. PAUL S W COLLINS ST 37.74 OVERPAY 02450800000 92/06/23.0007 WELLS. DAVID M LOCKSLEY LN 1.61 OVERPAY 02672300000 92/06/24-0017 KNIGHT, JANIE MCGEE W COLLEGE ST 0101 OVERPAY 08440200000 92107/01.OOD7 DENTON AUTO AUCTION W COLLINS ST 3.62 OVERPAY 90754000000 92/07/02-0002 QUAKENSUSH OESSGNS SAN JACINTO 35 0.10 OVERPAY 02837500000 92107/07-0011 WALDROP JACK E ASPEN OR 284,63 OVERPAY 03003300000 99,07/29.0180 AILEY. PONY A STROUD ST 0.02 OVERPAY 09436700000 92/01/30-0009 ABBOTT, RAYMOND L TEASLEY LN 0.01 OVERPAY 03288100000 92/08/24-0004 BANKS, DOROTHY ESTATE BAILEY ST 0.54 OVERPAY 03635500000 92/08/25.0003 O'REAR, 0 W BERNARD ST 8.12 OVERPAY 03538800000 92108/27.0021 SMITH, CATHERINE ALINE WILLOWWOOD ST 0.01 OVERPAY 02166000000 91/09/02-0010 GRAY ELTON E BERNARD ST 0168 OVERPAY 02188900000 92109103-0023 MINTiR, FLORENCE PARK LN 10.00 OVERPAY 03829600000 92109/04-0006 RAMSEY, ROBERT 6 BARBARA WALLACE TEASLEY LN 0.01 OVERPAY t6287100000 92/09/04-0007 RAMSEY, ROBERT 6 BARBARA WALLACE 0101 OVERPAY 15002400000 92/09104-0009 MARSHALL, GARY LYNN TEASLEY N 96 L 0.12 OVERPAY 03388600000 92/09/10.0006 JOriNSON, JOHN C ULAND ST t.96 OVERPAY 09939700000 92/09/10.0007 MR CATTI'S 0315 N AVE B 354.65 OVERPAY NAHUM 9 1 008 MR GATTE'9 0314 - - joeN1VlR SITY D '-p LUNG HitLS A TOTAL OF OVERPAYMENTS 33.689.22 0.00 € v' Vy ♦ p~~ 11 tr?: s NRMI♦II t::::.. , .~t K.4?FFNI~RIFIa Ira.:.:: IIIIJ.•::' Y. +T` rtj'jY iY 1IIIItaf: ♦ _ r~Rfsc r.._J.•, .K' ~I ~~~~j~RiYa.♦r.._.. f «7ppRYYtara-r:. ~ . Y-rant:::.:'.', -YpY•4' ~ .M+tMMYSWi4! . s:LGLL r., . -st, 411'•. W94S,:'.:'. \SLSS'.'_'. Lltt,i tl iiL1: t'.1 itLtttt\f is Lt L::I Lilt l:f iitt:f Li tltl tilt f : t tLi it i♦ Lta~t waft sLLa as af~f tasf ♦La a u att b i ♦ai v \a- a• s ! b ra 0 M,Z 3 ApeaCaNo t60 Agen Is Its Data fl ORDINANCE NO. to I AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PR(L"JIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated com- petitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances; and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has receiv- ed and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or im- provements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. That the following competitive bids for the con- struction of public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals" or plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City's Purchasing Agent filed according to the bid number assigned hereto, are hereby accepted and approved as be- ing the lowest responsible bids: BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 1513 BOMDEN'S GUARANTEED HYDROMULCH 6 SOD INC. $ 38,879.00 SECTION II. That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award of the bid. SECTION III. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all necessary written contracts for the performance of tho construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Propos- als, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, condi- s ACendaNo C AAEndallem r tions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and speci- fied sums contained therein. SECTION IV. That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council here- by authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto. SECTION V. That this ordinance shall become effective im- mediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the r day of 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST! JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY., C ` ggea Na ApIdaltem C? DATE: JULY 8, 1993e -A-- r CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: BID # 1513 - SOFTBALL & SOCCER COMPLEX HYDROMULCH RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Bowden's Guaranteed Hydromulch and Sod Inc., In the total amount of $38,879.00. SUMMARY: This bid is for all labor and materials necessary in Hydromulching with bermuda in the North Lakes Park Phase II area, which is approximately 32 acres. Six bid proposals were received in response to eleven bid invitations mailed. BACKGROUND: Tabulation Sheet, Memorandum from Bob Tickner dated June 24, 1993. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this project areavailable from Grant fund acct 4463-038- 0063-0001-9009 with a balance of $514,496.89. Respec ly/suubmitted: v Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Approved: ` Nerve: Denise filarpool Title: Senior Buyer ~q~nd~. f90 aAAndeNo. `3 - C~~~L _ 1513 - PAGE 1 agendalten~' ' tae - ,-C SOFTBALL 6 SOCCER COMPLEX , T.B.G.I. CLIFFORD FOGUS TEXAS MANN ROBINSON HYDROMULCH JUNE E 2 222, , 1993 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SON INC. MGMT CO. j DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR BASE BID ;48,975.00 $72,500.37 $52,324.22 ;69,300.00 ADDENDUM #1 YES YES YES YES ERTIFIED CHECK OR BID BOND YES YES YES YES WORK DAYS 20 DAYS 29 DAYS 60 DAYS 120 DAYS 1513 - PAGE 2 SOFTBALL 6 SOCCER COMPLEX BCC BOWDENS HYDROMULCH BALLARD GUARANTEE JUNE 22, 1993 DESCRIPTION VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR VENDOR BASE BID $53,798.00 $38,879.00 ADDENDUM #1 YES YES :RTIFIED CHECK OR BID BOND YES YES WORK DAYS 75 DAYS 60 DAYS E t 06Date CITY 01 DFNTON, 7EXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McAINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks DATE: June 24, 1993 SUBJECT: Recommendation on Bid 11513 North Lakes Park Phase II Hydromulch. After review of the bids received for Bid 11513 Softball and Soccer Complex Hydromulch, we wish to recommend the low bid of Bowden's Guaranteed Hydromulch and Sod Inc. of Colleyville, Texas 76034 in the amount of $38,879. This will seed approximately 32 acres. Other bidders were: 1. TBGI Inc. Granbury, Texas $48,975.00 2. Texas Environmental Management, Justin, Tx. $52,324.22 3. Ballard consulting & Contracting, Dallas, Tx. $53,798.00 4. Mann Robinson & son, Aubrey, Texas $69,300.00 5. Clifford E. rogue Co., Irving, Texas $72,500.00 Funding for the project will come from the North Lakes Athletic Bond Funds and Texas Parks and Wildlife Grant. The project estimate was $50,000. Please advise if you have any questions. Robert K. Tickner Superintendent of Parks RT:ve wp 8171566.8200 O/FW METRO 434.2529 4. x♦ -3 d' r agenda No 17 Agendalte T5'' CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E H O R A N D U M m = = a = _ _ _ _ _ TO: LLOYD HARRELL, CITY MANAGER FROM: RICH DLUOAS9 DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JULY Is 1993 SUBJECT: HYDROMULCH - NORTH LAKES PARK The hydromulching at North Lakes Park will be for the establishment of turf on the soccer fields and the outfields at the softball fields. Consideration is being given to sodding the infields of the softball fields later in the project. Prior to the proposed sodding of the infields, I will meet with representatives from the softball associations to determine if they concur with the plan. I have informally discussed sodding the infields with the presidents of the Men's Softball Association and Co-Rec Softball Association and have received no negative comments. Please let me know if I can provide further information. E Rich Dlugas Director of Parks and Recreation RD/ing ABBOOIFC I 8171566.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 1~. tile, J J•. N. is I 2517L/15B9 VndaNo ~ Apeada item Cate 212 k9-3 NO. f o n -g AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE ORDER TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND CLIFFORD FDGUS PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRA N EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on January 5, 1993 , the City awarded a contract for the construction o certainimprovements to NORTH t,AK&s paRxs 11 in the amount o 424.600.00 ' en WHEREAS, the City Manager hiving recommended to the Council that a change order be authorized to amend such contract with respect to the scope and price and said change order being in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 252 of the Local Government Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON: SECTION I. That the change order to the contract between the City an CLIFFORD FOCUS , a copy of which is attached hereto, n the amount 0 EIGHTY ONE THOUSAND t'OUR HUNDRED , SQ= am 00------------------ o ars 81 471.00 , 9 hereby approve an -the expenditure of funds t5ere or is hereby authorized. SECTION II. That this ordinance shall become effective imme iat~' eTy 'upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JE :IFER AL , CITY CRE APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY: I Ag01daNo Ageada~tartt S-YLAO (kale DATE: July 6, 1993 CITY COUNCIL REPORT O TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE ORDER # 32209 - CHANGE ORDER #3 TO CLIFFORD FOGUS $81,471.00 RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this change order to Clifford Fogus, in the total amount of 8],471.00, be approved. SUhMRY: This change order is to extend the concrete roadway from the new North Lakes Park, creating a new entrance to Bonnie Brae. This price also includes drainage flumes, drain pipe, excavation kind compacted fill. The original contract price for the construction of North Lakes Phase 11 was $424, 600.00. This change order along with change order 1 & 2 will total $100,147.00 which is within the allowable 25% (or $]06,150.00) of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: Purchase Order #32209, Memorandum from Bob Tickner dated June 25, ]993. FISCAL IMPACT: Grant and Bond funds for North Lakes Park Phase II Account #465-038-0063-0001-9009 with a balance of $514,496.89 Account #440-020-DRAN-8728-9108 with a balance of $12,429.90 Respec ly aubmi t Lloy V. Harrell City Manager r Approved: Name: D~nIse Harpool Title: 'Lenior Buyer ~q~nd a.)9f CITY OF DENTUN, TEXAS 001-STEXAS STREET PURCHASE ORDER 76201 C P. 0N a~e~dli±ertj/~ 5 } 32209 DATEIVENDOR NO. DOCUMI C TypF 06-29-43 C04 6. VENDOR FOG49000 SHIPTO; CLIFFORD FOGUS 2333 HINTON CONFIRMATION ONLY C04 PARRS i RECREATION IRVINO TX 75061 321 E. MCAINNEY DENTON; TEXAS 76201 ITEM AOZ;OUNTNUMBER UNITSNUMDER DESCRIPTION BID NO, LiNEAMOUNT 01 465 038 0063 0001 9009 CONSTRUCTION OF NORTH LARP.S 424,604.00 02 465 038 0063 0001 9009 PARR PHASE 11 0.00 03 465 038 0063 0001 9009 C.O. 41 INCREASE 8,765.00 04 465 038 0063 0001 9009 C.O. t2 INCt,8AS6 5,921,00 05 465 038 0063 0001 9009 C.O. e3 INCREASE Si,a<1.00 06 440 020 DRAM 8728 9108 CON'T FROM C.O. e3 12,4.10.00 The City Of Denton, Taxes Is tax exempt-hlOUee BIII No, 20, TOTAL AMOUNT 524, 720.00 Reference P.O. Number on all BIL, 8hlpments and Involces. Shlpmentsors F. 0. B. Cltyof Denton, or$$ Indicated. By lend Invokes TO: Direct Inquiries TO: City of Denton, Accounts Payable John J. Marshall, C, P. M. Purchasing Agent 218 E. McKlnnsy lt., Denton, TX 78201 Tom D. Shaw, 0. P, M. Asst, Purchasing Agent (or AS Indleted on Purchase Order) 8111888-8311 D1FW Metro 287.0042 The City of Denton Is an equal opportunity employer 1 v ~gendaNo ~ ~ ~ ~ Agendalte Ua~ CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKI NNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 M E M O R A N D U M a a W a a a a a a a TO: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent FROM: Bob Tickner, Superintendent of Parks DATE: June 250 1993 SUBJECT, Change order to Clifford Fogus Contract, North Lakes Park P.O. 032209. The attached change order is to extend the 443 feet of concrete roadway in the current North Lakes Park Contract of Clifford Fogus Co., by 11010 Linear feet to create a new entrance from Bonnie Brae Street. The total ccet to add the 10010 feet with approach aprons, drainage flumes, drain pipe, excavation and compacted fill will be $81,471. The original contract amount for Clifford Fogus Company was $424,600. The $81,471 amount is within the allowable 251 change order amount of $106,150. Please schedule this on the July 6, Council Agenda for approval. If you need any additional information, please contact me at 566- 8275, 00,11 Robert I. Tick er Superintendent of Parks RT:ve wp I 81716666200 DIM METRO 434.2529 1 milli No City of Denton city council minutes fie- r~ ~Ir~ May i8, 1993"~? , Page 6 request, Mr. Svehla stated that Copper Canyon had been on record for a long time stating that they did not want the 2499 project in their city. Because of the finalization of the annexation by Highland Village and because the alignment had always been more to the east of Copper Canyon, a gap was established for the 2499 project. Predetermination of the alignment was a problem because TXDOT and federal funds would not allow it because of the environmental process and other processes required before alignment was determined. Because of the many possible alignments which had been discussed and which could either be in Denton's or Corinth's ETJ, Mr. Svehla felt that Copper Canyon could not sabotage the project. Mr. Harrell stated that from the staff's standpoint that it was advantageous to have everyone in the corral when visiting TXDOT to argue for funding. By getting Copl'er Canyon on record in favor of the 2499 project, Denton neutralized Copper Canyon's opposition to the project and helped the long range strategy for the project. Council Member Cott stated ,his concern was that previous statements to TXDOT by Copper Canyon were not forgotten. Mr. Svehla stated that some people around the area in question had requested annexation. Copper Canyon was a general law city which only did annexations by request. With the Copper Canyon resolution in hand, Denton could say they had boon to the table many times to assist them. Council Member Miller stated that a lot of emphasis had boon put on the 2499 project at the Region Transportation Council. The project had gotten good hearings from both RTC and the TXDOT to the 2499 project had boon put on the highway system. Funding was available for the studies. Council Member Brock stated that she admired the City Manager's skill in extracting the agreement from Copper Canyon. Council Member Cott asked if Lake Sharon folks still objected to the 2499 project. Mr. Svehla said that Lake Sharon was not overjoyed and every effort was made to use tress and natural barriers to stay away from the retreat area. The consensus of the Council was to move ahead with Copper Canyon's request. ~4. The Council received a report and hold a discussion regarding a 1 6 Ag11dallterrL r City of Denton City Council Minutes CU1e Z - May 181 1993</ Page 7 construction of a road from Bonnie Brae Street to a new parking lot for the North Lakes Sports Complex and gave staff direction. Rich Dlugas, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that the request was for the city to accept a two and one half acre tract of property located north of Windsor and east of Bonnie Brae from Newton Rayzor. Acceptance of the property allowed the city to build an access road from Bonnie Brae into the new sports complex at North Lakes Park. Mr. Dlugas stated that the North Lakes Homeowners Association and residents of the North Lakes area expressed concern over the initial development of the complex and the future 300 car parking lot in which cars exiting the lot ran through the existing 125 car parking lot and emptied out onto Windsor Drive. Past problems with cars exiting the existing lot and coming down Parkside and through the neighborhood creating a dangerous situation increased with the new lot. The new road created a safer environment. Mr. Dlugas proposed constructing the road with project savings. The road cost was approximately $80,000 and the funds came from three sources) the road which connected the new lot with the existing lot would not be built for a savings of approximately $28,000) savings from lighting of fields while keeping at recreational lighting levels as at all other complexes would save approximately ;43,000) and approximately $12,000 interest earnings from the 1986 CIP transportation and engineering projects. The Park Board and the North Lake Homeowner Association gave their approval and the interest money from the 86 CIP bond issue had been approved by the 191 Committee. Mr. Harrell stated that the project was one Mr. Dlugae took on which most thought was difficult to accomplish. Mr. Dlugas had done a great job cutting other elements of the program to get the required amount of money needed to build the road. Council Member Chew asked if Mr. Dlugas thought that the road project really took the traffic off of Parkside. Mr. Dlugas stated that signage was needed to direct people to use Bonnie Brae to access the soccer complex. The only entrance to the new parking lot was from Bonnie Brae. Council Member Smith applauded the entire plan and expressed concern about any place that had only one route in and out. Smith recommended that the Council accept the dedication of the land for the new road. The Mayor asked if the new road was a drive or was it a dedicated t Agenda No. 1~' ~T << AgendaItaRLE,~&Lg, City of Denton City council Minutes Da1e May 18, 1993 ~G Page B street with a name. Rick Svehla, Deputy city manager, stated that the land was dedicated as a roadway. The Mayor recommended that when the time came to put a name on the street the city consider naming It for Rayzor. Council Member Brock stated that some mistakes were made in the past when the park waa divided by an east/west thoroughfare and she felt better that the 300 cars were directed to Bonnie Brae. Council Member Chew stated that it was important to make sire signage was correct so that folks used the new lot. Mr. Svehla stated that in the beginning calling the new road Soccer Field Drive and renaming the road as Rayzor developed the area. The consensus of the Council was to accept the donation of land and to build the new road from Bonnie Brae Street to a new parking lot for the North Lakes Sports Complex. The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 700 p.m, in the Council Chambers. PRESENTi Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Brock, Chew, Perry, Smith and Miller, ABSENTi None 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. The Council Call Session n of April 13# 1993, 1993,~o and the t Regular Session ofpApril 27, 1993. Perry motioned, Smith seconded to approve the minutes as presented. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "ays", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 1rr• 30 The Council considered a request from Josten's for special permission to perform construction work from 5/5/93 - 5/21/93 Monday through Saturday from 700 p.m. - 500 a,m. K PROPOJlBD ATRPE'T % DRDICATION I w `1 C MP p~ I LO hNI I NORTH LAKE • L..._ YGR • ♦ ~ VAS 0.00 -EXISTING . PARKING ~--41 LOT NOIA~jfY~A~!'!rs ~LOT" EXISTING TOPOGRAPICAL NO RECREATION M In KO M* ON 1:3 SK I p lo MAiL _ EXISTING nK "At M1~L K LAID ~ '•.~j'• .l COkTAACt01t SkALL Uw 1 k+ TENNIS AND GRAM roll nrt Pit C K • l.~~1, . COURTS ►OLLIN IN IM 9ASC MD 3290 r. P~ 5 Ott SKEI CO-1. ' ~ CAIMaGT'taQ c.IJLI.I. ♦I'l~lr~ I 5i :I :r rl -1 a 1 1. -EE 17, L M, =7 I nil 1: :IlTr I- lin: L I= :J444 4T m I CITE ffff COUNCIL 11 .171:27 1171 mxm: :7 :71111: X Z.1.1 1. 11 In: 6 4l h,} 0 G 3 b e ~ M~ 14 1 tr j ApendsIt G~ ate ` - lcif3 C1TY a DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE M 17) 508-8307 Office of the City Manager MEMORANnUD4 DATES July 1, 1993 T0: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM: Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Loading Zones At the last City Council meeting, you will recall that five members were present when the fee structure for loading zones came up. Three of the members voted for it) two members voted against. Subsequent to that vote, there was discussion as to whether four votes were needed to pass an ordinance, rather than a majority of the members present. We have visited with Legal and I understand that their interpretation would require four votes. Therefore, we consider the vote at the last meeting to be non-binding and we are bringing this section of the ordinance back before the Council. If you have any further questions, I will be happy to try to answer them for you. Rick vehla Deputy City Manager RS:es urioovo F t agenda NO Agodalte Date ` C1 D ciryot purom, r1FXAS MUNICIPAL GUILDINU / DENTON. TExAS 702011 'TELEPHONE (8 1?)98e•8307 OHIce of the City Manager MEMfJHANOUM TOt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM1 Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager DATEt June 3, 1993 SUSJECTt Cost of Loading Zones On June 1st, Council passed the updated version of the Loading Zones. We inadvertently forgot to fill in the blank for the cost of the zones. i have attached minutes from Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission. Their recommendation of .50 per foot per month equates to a $132.00 per year fee for a single space, or a $264,00 j per year fee for a double space. This cost is fairly similar to other cities that wa surveyed and it reflects our approximate cost for installation and maintenance of the zones. In the prior ordinance,, cost of the single zone was $120. If you or Council have any further questions, we would be happy to try and answer them. O ck Svah a Deputy City Manager AMM002D9 yy i I' r~ypdou~wrtuo+dr.,o aQerldaNo ~ n -b' Apendalle ` Dale ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING FEES TO BE PAID IN RELATION Iro AN APPLI- CATION FOR OR RENEWAL OF A LOADING ZONEI AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION I. (a) That upon granting any application for a load- ing zone, the following fees shall be paid prior to installation of the loading zone: 1. A single loading zone shall be $132.00 per yeart and 2. A double loading zone shall be $264.00 per year. (b) That a~iy renewal of a loading zone shall reguire the payment of the following fees: 1. A single loading zone shall be $132.00 per years and 2. A double loading zone shall be $264.00 per year. SECTION II, That a schedule of the fees provided herein shall be maintained on file in the office of the City Secretary. SECTION I U. That this ordinance shall become effective four- teen (14) dales from the date of its passage,•and the City Secretary is hereby directed to cause the caption of this ordinance to be published twice in the Denton Record-Chronicle, the official news- paper of the City of Denton, Texas, within (10) days of the date of its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BYI APPROVED Al TO LEGAL FORM: DE RA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY By CITY COUNCIL ~01 °t d ~f0M St4► \ CQGLC6~~ I r t ~ t Y ApendaNO . , 1 Ap Malt CITY COUNCIL IFPORT DA -O?f j-7Qu- Ic) ~I TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution Creating a Special Citizens Advisory Committee to Study a Possible Sales Tax to Reduce Property Tax DATE: July 6, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution creating a citizen committee to study a possible one half cent sales tax to reduce property taxes. The City council needs to determine the number of citizens to be on this committee and when the timeframe for the citizen committee to report back to the Council. BACKGROUND: Alternative sources of revenue was a goal of the City Council from the June 1992 planning session and has been on the City Council's work session agenda. The City Council discussed creating a citizen committee to study a possible sales tax to reduce property tax at the recent planning session. SUMMARY: Phis resolution authorizes the City Council to appoint a Special Citizens Advisory Committee to study and make a recommendation to the City Council. The committee will also utilize experts to gain information regarding the economic Impact such a sales tax increase and property tax decrease would have on Denton citizens. The resolution has several blanks where the City Council needs to indicate the number of persons to serve and how many each City Council Member may appoint. For example, the City Council may want a fifteen member committee with each Council Member appointing two members and the whole Council appointing a chairperson. This blank is located in Section II of the ordinance. The other blank in the ordinance (Section I) addresses the timeframe within which the committee will make its report to the Council. As the City Council is aware, there are only four possible election dates: August, November, January, and May. If the City Council wants to aim for a November election, the committee's report needs to be submitted in a fairly short timeframe in order to have time to call the election and allow information to be distributed to the citizens if the committee's recommends the sales tax. The City CouncV. must call an election at least 45 days prior to the election. However, if another date ll /41C~ Agenda No _K AQendd1t0m Otte -11-.6_. would be targeted the committee would have time to deliberated) longer. PROGRAMS DEPARTMENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED: Citizens, Visitors, and businesses of Denton PA= FISCAL_ IM PAM None. RESPECT LILLY SUBMITTED, U. Lloyd V. Harrell City Manager Prepared by: Catherine E. J Tuck Administrative Assistant. a s ea\wPdoca\rea\ealetax.r AgvdaNo~ Y Ageedalta Dal e_.~._~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AND CREATING A SPECIAL CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING A POSSIBLE ADDITION- AL SALES TAX TO REDUCE THE PROPERTY TAX; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, recently, the Governor signed House Bill 384 into law, allowing a city not included within the boundaries of a transit authority to adopt an additional sales and use tax to reduce the property tax with the positive vote of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be ad- visable to create a special Citizens Advisory Committee to study and provide recommendations regarding a possible additional sales tax to reduce the property tax; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires that the Special Citizen Ad- visory Committee make a report regarding the results of its study and a recommendation for a course of action; Now, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY RESOLVES! SECTION I. That the City Council shall create and appoint a Special Citizens Advisory Committee to study and make recommenda- tions to the City Council, regarding a possible additional sales tax to reduce the property tax. The Special Citizens Advisory Com- mittee shall utilize the findings of outside experts to analyze the economic impact of such a tax on the various economic groups of Denton citizens. The Committee shall submit its report to the Council no later than , 1993. SECTION II1 That the Special Citizens Advisory Committee shall be composed of persons of the community and shall perform its functions in accordance with the intent of this reso- lution, as directed by the Council. Furthermore, each member of the Council will nominate individualr to serve on the Committee and the Council shall designate the chairperson of the Committee. SECTION II7L That this resolution shall become effective imm- ediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of -_-o 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR rl <3 Acsoda No. c ~ Agenda lte~'r Dale t{sf y ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY V ` BY: LM46Le Mage 2 r~ - CITY COUNCIL o e ro H t ~+~p0 OGO~ M21: X TIM ApendiNo. 4 Ap r4aIt BOARD/COMMISSION NOMINATIONS 1993-94 AIRPORT ADVI80RY BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUN~jI 2 Terry Gayland N 1993-95 Chew 3 George Gilkeson 1993-95 Smith 7 Rick Woolfolk 1993-95 Brock ANIMAL UMBR ADVISORY BOARb §M CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 1 Bettye Johnson _ 1993-95 Mayor 2 Nonie Kull 1993-95 Chew 4 Steve Meyerdirk 1993-95 Perry 5 VACANT 1991-94 Cott BOARD OF ADJU8TN8NT BEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TES~i COUNCIL 2 VACANT 1993-95 Brock 3 Bill Colville 1993-95 Mayor 4 E. Ray Griffin 1993-95 Chew 6 Rebecca Blair 1993-95 Perry 7 Rebecca King 1993-95 Cott BUILDING CODE BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER f01HATION 3ER~ OUNCiL 4 Ed Owens 1993-95 Chew 5 Cliff Reding _ 1993-95 Smith t avda No 4an~aEta CABLE TY ADVISORY BOARD a U 1 SEAT CMENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUN L 1 Joe Holland 1993-96 Miller 5 Richard Rodean _ 1993-96 Smith 91TISONS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMI88ION SEAT CURRENT MEMBEFj NOMINATION WE vgU c ~ 1 Carolyn Bacon 1993-95 Perry 2 Doug Chadwick 1993-95 Cott 3 Betty Duncan 1993-95 Miller 5 Alice Gore 1993-95 Mayor COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMIT7X,a CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM C CIL 4 Peggy Norton 1993-95 Chew 5 Sarah Parker 1993-95 Smith 7 Dennis Stephens _ 1993-95 Cott 9 Jack Weir _ 1993-95 Brock DATA PROCISSINO ADVISORY 80 RD fim CURRANT MEMBER NOMINATION ISM COUNCIL 1 Don Edwards 1993-95 Mayor 2 Jim Kuykendall 1993-95 Chew agenda No. D . Agenda llamC VO - - ~~'1'01IN 9I80Rv nn~nn .SEAT CURRENT ME__MBEa NOMINATION TERM COUNCI 1 Dean Cochran 1943-95 Miller 2 Dori DaVis 3 Kathleen Gigl 1993-95 Brock 4 George Highfill 1993-95 Mayor 5 Dan Hill 1993-95 Chew 11 Bill Thomas 1493-95 Smith 1993-95 Chew ELBCTRICAr COD! BO nn T CURRENT MEMB R NOMINATION COUN "r r, 1 Stuart Cawthon ' 1993-95 Smith 4 Terry Schertz 3 Trenton L. Williams 1993-45 Miller 6 Fred G. Reed 1993-95 Brock i 1993-95 Mayor HISTORIC L wMWIS x nnyfrTaurnY.~ ~T CURRENT M~$ COUNCIL 1 Judith Abbott 1993-45 Smith 3 W. A. Barker 1993-95 Cott 4 Liz Bays 5 Elinor Caldwell ~ 1993-95 Miller 1993-95 Brock 7 Rita Holcomb 9 George Speller - 1993-95 Chew 1993-95 perry Agenda No. 4endalien . ssnnic a O~le.~-- ~ BEAT CRENT M MBFo NOMINATIO:J T.~B~ C UNCI , 1 Al Barstis 2 Catherine Bell 1993-95 Cott 5 Dorothy Damico 1993-95 Miller 7 Linda Holloway 1993-95 Chew 9 Carol Riddlesperger - 1993-95 perry 30 Gary Truitt 1993-95 Miller 11 VACANT 1993-95 Brock 1993-95 Mayor li~EP DENTO_N ~1LiL=TTPUL BOartn ~.T 5.~7$RENT MF,~,a NOMIiNATION TEM o 2 John Cooper 3 Dick Engle 1993-95 Smith 4 John Enlow 1993-95 Perry 5 Sherrie Etheredge 1993-95 Cott 8 Jeane Morrison 1993-95 Miller 9 Martha Len Nelson 1993-95 Chew " 1993-95 Smith rtlB$1~8_ Y 80~AD ;SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NSt~[2{AT~9lI T1'iBM COUP 1 Dorothy Adkins 2 - Jean Greenlaw 1993-95 Miller 4 Dorothy Minter 1993-95 Brock 5 Mary Jo Pickens 1993-95 Chew 1993-95 Smith AgendaN'o Aytndlfeij n PARRS AND REeR8ATtoN BOARD Nte- 7 _ `1 "M CMENT MEMBE DOMINATION TERM COUNCI 1 Dalton Gregory 1993-95 Miller 2 Burkley Harkless 1993-95 Brock 4 Neta Stallings 1993-95 Chew PIING AND SONINO COMMI88ION a~EAT Cj=ENT M--EMBER NOMI IATION TERM CQSjNCIL 2 Richard Cooper 1993-95 Cott 5 Ivan Glasscock 1993-95 Mayor 6 Mary Evelyn Huey 1993-95 Chew 7 Melvin Willis 1993-95 Smith PLUNBINO AND MECIL'HICU COpZ pOAgD fi= CURRENT MEMBER NOMIl1ATI0N T~(jb COUNCIL 1 George Becker 1993-95 Perry 2 Bill Burley _ 1993-95 Cott 5 Ted Lewellen 1993-95 Mayor 7 Bob Sullivan 1993-95 Smith PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD R, CURRENT MEMBER = NATION COUNCIL 5 John Thompson 1993-97 Mayor r rY R~ A Agenda No. c3 " C><~~/ cj Agenda] tetrl. Date 6 ~_.~,T~ SIGN BOARD Ot ARPb~ALB ~j ~ SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 2 Gene Gumfory 1993-95 Smith Frank Massey 1993-95 Cott 5 Tony Soto 1993-95 Miller 6 Jim Tucker 1993-95 Brock CIVIL anyicE COMMIBsio ;TEST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM 2 Frank Davila 1993-96 Harrell DENTON HOVOING AUTHORITY ;TEST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TE$b 3 George Hubbard _ 1993-95 Mayor 4 Warren Whitson 1993-95 Mayor 5 William Wilson 1993-95 Mayor I TXPA_80ARD OF DIRECT.QU EEST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATIOd TM 2 Ray Stephens _ 1993-95 Council AC000128 CITY COUNCIL e e 4, IF T. r r r X00 D~atl r -1 4+ AQendr~No. Apendalt ,y Date ciryotVENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 /TELEPHONE (8 1?) FOO.8307 Office of the City Manager MEMORANDUM DATE: July 2, 1993 TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT: Major Budget Issues On your agenda Tuesday evening will be an item for giving staff direction concerning various major budget issues. We plan to do two things in regard to this item. First, Kathy DuBose, Director of Budget and Accounting Operations, has submitted to you responses to various inquiries which we received last week when the issues were first presented. Hopefully, her response provides the information desired by various Council members. Secondly, if you are prepared to give any type of preliminary direction concerning major budget issues, it would be appropriate to do so Tuesday evening. There are two issues which may be good candidates for such direction. If the Council would like the Human Servicos Committee to reprioritize their recommended allocation, it would be appropriate to resubmit this issue back to that committee. The procedure which has been followed in the past is that the City Council determines a tentative funding level, and then asks the Human Services Committee to recommend the allocation of this new amount to the various agencies. This reprioritization is then returned to the City Council and no final decisions are made until later in the budget process, we can visit more about this on Tuesday evening. The second issue concerns basic ambulance fees, Since we are now discussing ambulance contracts with the small cities, it would be helpful for us to increase our basic ambulance fee immediately if there was significant comfort with this action on tha part of the City Council. As you recall, our ambulance fee is well below the average fee being charged by neighboring jurisdictions. The sooner uendaNo ~oendalte ' Major Budget Issues July 1, 1993c3t Page 2 the Council makes such a revision, the more helpful such would be to our EMS revenue stream, In addition to these two areas, there may be other instructions which the Council would like to give us regarding the major budget Issues, Lacking such, the next formal budget event will come at the end of this month when the comprehensive proposed budget is submitted to the City Council. Shortly thereafter, we will commence formal budget hearings with department directors. i If you have any questions concerning this subject, please feel free to contact me. G~/• lG LL d V. Harrell City Manager LVHrss AMM002FF " tnrtf t - rw " rxtr t • retx PROPOSED SF16 ~ .rrrdt.ruf 16,205 Ac.~s• , r t+ri Mau vim u a nrx ewer IN If i a a W"r 0 W Al lit a r'r'tiI tw PROPOSED w,er tM L t.,rtrt~~ ~n 135.967 Ac, r f. M ruin uw tw P o.w.l PROPOSED g Mfg OFFICE ZONING it 4,706 Ac, ZONING EXHIBIT FOR HUNTERS RIDGE 156.696 ACRES J. MCGOWAN SURVEY, A-797 S.F. REYNOLDS SURVEY, A-1654 G & A Consultants" Inc. M.E.P. 6 P.R.R. SURVEY A-950 VIN 4 0 PU"WO J. FISHER SURVEY, A-421 PA ■,r ur~~ aama CITY OF DENTON. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS DRAW It LE. COAT WAY" so" t•.&W +o° wo.193039 ip, k L I ~r y ~ I. ' . Cr 1i8, 0' 116 99' -_F____~ { ~ 116.59 i Y1C.S5' ~ I '~JS(is. {}(t fly } .{t•~t~~ .17~1 ~ ~l F!t,5i f . _ rf t f.~~~ V _ . ' 01 4S 1 _ }94,11'. -19d.1Fr'-~-- I r~ 'V,LN,~ t p . I In ~ '.I I cJ _ - N G~ 1 i 75 Ga' 88 59' ' 9 i 25, i r' Ii N { . 01 Cif Ln <t • li' u ' iid. o a U g' 4: Ugg~' cr J ns•s >~,id' ~ ;A fi' i~sc4' I f I 6" ~ 2 1 0 ~ r~ I f 9 j oc a i. 949-. - 7i Irl 00 - i I CID ~4 U U! l y.• O Q) f.: 3 t '14" 1 try j f W~ ? O ~ 38 + I I , s O y r . ' r I f ~ f f• y. x I Irk CL /44' fj A~Rrw r C80, .pfYJ I x x ' x x ° I rr. c~ c~ 0 0 k n r~_ rus~tL w n \ / I w ~ PON ~ it f;Nntan dab, r i . j In 'p t, • ~ , ~ " I li rn CIO In 00,34 1") 308.2,2' " r yr '',S W 'F. r ~ ItL rv co X99 Az- t-A; 'v i jJ 21 "r O"t C ~cY r) • 7 f 7 0 0 1 h' t, l ( r $ I j +54 _AR M Ded 4I' J [r ; 56.3 56 v L L 00<v w o 3 v ~Y ~Un a)) 3 7 11 o> G7 :p LA N t0 I W ~ n ~1 1 n. ~ ,f s 'c i r~ O p ~l'' r', ~ p „ 1 i r. , n 7C n 7 n U n i n CAL vn' 3 < n cro N V J o V Q ID ,D O. J O 1 1 . L 110 coz oL' cT°rn v CE! Jim N xmx o X a N D D n i l l< N N r IIM °wo FA ;ice tr) r o ! 0 I rr ~ ~ o rr> rn z X o a? -j1 M v w / 0 n C. r vi N' o ° cc~ O z p ° r SIC D ° A" b r-r Q M n:" M m W n C 0 C) rn c: IIJ N ? I~ ? a. ° M RECEIVED JON 24 1993 L PLANNING 8 0EVELOPIALST `~f ~EVAAIMENi C T r1-~ N L) j 1. 'j Z r, o 0. o oIr✓1` _ rr l i N 00630'05' E 399.91' , I ~ bf 5bl + ~ 1 n ` 1 o-Y C f. y r I i ~ II ~ ~ n ~l Iw ~ 71 ri A Q r r + l nrT t/ Ln y ~m ca f" r L 1 o CO pQ I r ~ i t k9. / iA -4 r7 n , orrs of w r~ 02.30 + , ~ ii a `~f ( r r__ a f1~L115 j t ~ 'WuSL rSR2 9sr;~:NIGI ~G':l ;aa ut ~a i X04 = oll `i~l; s',~ e._r " a. X94 '.i tI E j t f ' Y•~o~. int.`1 '~F1 l 1 0 w ~ C .v - .IVIl1 SULh t yuJt $ -Low 1r S~ =y±„yA.[Y ..IS7'IIG~ y i4 N pynua s..i tAh".1 ! is 4c y►♦ n4 ti Jaensne ~±ts [It i, r ak- r L=f IWO- - e _ ~~.i. f'„' 1~ .,i ~ ~ W i ----b----- .hx~o♦4M1.-5~.~_ r nth ~r..T'{~i GLA: Zip, ;~iiii ~t~,1111 4 F aCL kG[ Y~ : b(21 f> MO 1. n ~n ..J v ny~r ''n ~~T c > ~ ^ n c rn rn o' r" r,n .n n P n n at ~ a Yn > ~ ~ • n n ou Y 2 t^ J j to n s O [ N np I. L+ Yn ~ M1 ~ Il 5 ~ ~ n J ; ^ ~ C S F r O O ~ n ^ ~ ~ ] .i a 4U ~ H H n A ?I n n p b r 'J y n~ ~ n~ a 7 ^ T P (i „ u P t n i {~pwr, ^ n^ ,t r Ll 1 P' + O O Og Y n C n d q° e n R P„ s 'L 4 M Jr r 1.1 r. 6 ° ♦ ♦ IS n g ^n ~ C n tl ~ r n ~ ~ r 6 ♦ ♦ g C ~ • rO ~ n R ~ F n tw w P, 6 O tl 1' C 0, > u n P r r n. • y r l M 2 • ~ v ♦ n ~ ~ ~ n ay 1 J ^ ~ P ~ V n [r a N y ~ n 11 ~ ~ ~ • N ~ rJ h ° P 'l n J ~ e rJ. ~ n r P ~ ! n♦ i R rte p? n n~ W J I n ~ n° ■ P ~ P P P ^ ~ y R 1'n 11 \ f. ~ [ I[ [ S n (1 ~ 1 S y/ ~i p t~ • Y Y n t s M (f ~ Z N p n ri ° N> V pryY. S ~ ^ n 1" ~ ° ♦ ~ rJ N ~ M 'V Y : ~ ry ~ P M ° P 0 n ~ p 1- P r 3 3 I-1~1 Y I yl 11 V O ^ N " 1.1 " n n 1• n rU-~ 10 100 mi w i n ry 1aL1 rr~ar'+: ~ a n i • n rC ~ ^hpr K .^Y~.• r•. ~ » S ~ r^° " ~ rte'. aj i p a ♦1 n Si f' Y y t° ~ Iryi ~ (I{.~ n e: ~~RQ!1 ; ^ t n n ~ u ~ ~n 1' " = P " w h rt ti n 7 g s' titQ( S• `p1 iN IN S~~ P p M ..I n r O f m y R r p a l` A <1 . p° M y N Ir ^ V^ n ~ ° b n r a " 1+ ~ N P 8 ^ n q r• q n q a ~ h s R e : : Y • P Q V R' r n n EMI y r° r n ; I e r". V Z g' 1S' c r nr ; n a n yY >y ~ r~ ^y0'IjQ•M D b Sy ~ e np•M Q ~ ~ ~4H Y O4 > ■n s ~ X~ E L% • ly CSY 1. M m ~ ~ n ny R ~ R M ~ 11 0 Ir J p■ N ' u'~ ; F n r ! N o ° ° M C 4 1~ b f.l ~ n U R pp W ° V' M J Y • w~ ^ ■ r Y fJ a n O n O !Ij n y ^Ch O g M h ~ n y 6 N J MJ 1 r n t, " ~ ~ ~j f1 w n n e .J ~ w n ^ ~J°1 11yr~1 p~ ° 4 C ° 'yV P 1}y1I~ J~ 63 V A ~1 4 11 l ! I I O IWI I'I M - ----T~ 4 V'1 I „ r w Il n 3 f ~ ~ Y J r s v a ~ _ , a ~ 2 A ~ F 2t" fl ~ S 1 In N r u z r D m w CD z _ rli i u O \ fTl O z n u n c~ N T' 2K _ ---.4I 's D 4 o w o D ~ cn z 01 z t fC1 A A CA < O O C i ti L) v 7 I 0 K r~ tp a Q[ i Z J / o C ~ - :0 • C3. j 7 ° n R1 y O D ~ n o O ~ u M ~ r In H " i r i b 3 e • i 7 S 5 .i 99 II~ g ~ O i~ ' • .I : S~ ~ e s r ni y Lu a a { !3 : n• w g r ~ ^ • p ay, r y •i j~a is y i I I ~ 3 E m (I ;e n aj 1 i., r' E m 1 = m O T N a N I a H b ra D ~ ~ • ~ ; y to D - / o W ! h~a ti Cc' CD ;U { o n o z ij s wo 3 0 0) v?vL ZA(A R1 lJ7 G rn r (M b r) { D J' rn r ~ D ;5 rr Cl a D r °r Co Li) L-P .2 (4 CL CIL f?" OD C) 0 06 : i ac m N Y U 1wr•- N Vfi r• 1 n~ ~j r v r~ r T Y 4 f ! i O ~J } ~Iti~G !u O tRj ~ f . u o f' ~td I, In ~ iv to 4 "ter ggUl N If: J h r E ' 'f 1 t I ~ 2 If I ~l Y ~ fl v _ o t• IS r J r yn r s . '~1 v i JE •a u. el All f v I° ~a 1 1 a _ ,7 .t M~ r aV 3 t r 'J .r • S 1 4 1 .414A An. !T l o~ Y A lv o l Y 7 u a b ~7j LU y d~ Olt, C a b b c A C~ T r ~ryf ~ ! k :f I 4 r •9 V' p M i r. ` y o r ~ 1 ♦~1 I n , ~ y N J ~ "S 7 LLl ~ rD y: i,. ' y .f INNS. M wC;,r,y nO~Pl"L1 nom. (D O cn o 0- ~r+ Cl X, 7d 100 rn ? :trSn O x p rn U1 M G7 Y r . CO rfi M r !^J now rnc~ x 4b cr y. 94 %lrry p fd w M N 0) p ur rr, y y CD c, a , ns fir, > t204 r S 1 ~MONTECITO ADORN. rTl BLOCK D 114 V4/P16 P.R. T, ZONED SF-16 , Ut 7; w y D Lei 1 ' i fn n rx NICHOLS 9, CLEARMAN rm m ZONED A H (AGRICULTURAL USE) V 511/P 277 D.R r N 0!07 ' 4 . ~ 616.79' { u r -4 r 00 N o < N = mS M z n D to 0 ( LO l0 J' IMr1 t 76 76 r- CA r- I{` • Z 0 r T 1 C OUi z wore ra ~o ~mq rn 0 %X m >f R ,o ~ s ,~~na o 0 F ' . t] ` Div Z m 0 ♦ n 4v n y I.. yn _y zy d~ N a 1 D v am as o 1 n ``I n '1 h In v a r $01'14'41+W .s10 40. } 8 03.38'241 £ 04' SOUTHMONT SUHGIVISIO"1 r 4 -ACE, i SECTION ONE a IIA a,, CAB Ef/V114 PR f 5 _ 8 • ti R. /'per` y \ e.e< '+r 70~ED SF-16 • Syr - y~ j ~<ti ~ f - . ~ 1 i r ~ PENNSYLVANIA (50' ROW) m r. f f ~ T8 -f N I y ti J 1 rr a r..a a v Ti ~x z T m +t a I• Ci iJ 1 i; ~ ~ X ri a O L, 1 I'i in r Z, t.. 1, Ll 2 i• m Ir Zia l: ~ 1 j ~ ~ i J 7. Ir a r' aJt+ ,ri U i 7 c~ rj ,j r G' 3T1 O y ra cJ Z T- r A f r ° b cl forT <M i7 'Tl M <m~ 'nnr2•+-, n T~ b n c rl t J Z n i 7 ~obrm+~d? c: r7 Z m<nrn O L o m n A cJ - ° 2 W to r o rn - n rn m n ry ca s r, id it U 7. - to m 2 a C-Tj n i) J p E < 2> V Cl C: -T1 r- 'tJ t) h is ~4 .I n c~ 1-i D n I. c- ~r ri 'rt ~i .,r xt y w 1 y IE y G A b 1 1 .L N ~ AI 6 N _ Z t' N < p6 ~ a ~ ba \ Fq Fp 60 > s r ~ ~1* ~ O ^ Ord ~ttl.., ! Pl Sf1 !c 6 o 0 a F i f. 1 1 " 1 oe: f41` V 4 mo ~ N fTl a N y x N m Q 7 N Z Z CJ 50 n I r- r. c e rn c x ' ~P' CAI W PE [5 MIl t. SOUTHMONT Rl e I R~'~I r.... BLOCK 2, 7nNrn Pn-d e 14ei41~NI r.I J / Y [ 1 ~ I__zfr~~ c 4K V ~ ~ - .-y wOf +w.i U A In 7 p b p~ ri r) b D is L -i S W ~ r f" f fq D = t I' Z U m°is ~0X zxmm r XrmC) Q G> 0 m O crown z ro -rn F - `<c r p D ° CT 0 rmrvr m n cnQrr C z m{ p y r? ,COQ v Qx z D ocy3 rr p _0 m'~mAV ° :Z O 2D ou'i U,m0<2 L' m0- r.Xm9) n O 7 m C1 ~zcmim z D a~ x 0' U Gl 0 < Z C < cn j y -1 O>b N t7 XCr- M 0 y N D N O r- r m m T r r- /v c = 4 ~ av1 O p a ~ ` ~ .h~K.N! ca.n Y ' Inc VKWI ~ Mili Vil Avis OlO ui.n aii aNn , j kc"l TM ' NI~~ K/4_ i ;"7 W1 y c` ' n n,~r i rlr ~ a p UN IINUa10,16 a INi a v 0 1 y lees /Ap ' Z yy~i ae ss r .1 , Q16.VS' ~OO O~±~ le irti0. 61ALLh - IW u V i C~ N - : 4a~ci o { ~ r e ~ o !DING LINE T v STREET iT OF WAY s oflo w C48, H, P097' P. R. 14 y BLOCK 4~ WATTAM ADDITION 7 ~ r 0 a i I f t ~1 ub 1 b u 1 t 3 T i p L a H„ 0 G ~'C n LLJ `O :r., fr[~Yyy~x3 z otJ'3 O OdoroHA PO O%cW0t~gl t~N ~xHOb E ~(~nM s.°:Ih ootxf yM R7 G~ r oxGIGMC0~OMmiMi[*, Oy b x t ~y:j cooyn nJn inn xz7 Mzfl o n~i~ (~~1 yTp 0. Z xAx b tb 7J x nM LA Lm En vM O t~ a:zL" xNN[~7HZ~Lei VCi M AMO yM0 MO b O N yZ NA0x0~m00 ti V1 p O M MMQNN ~p7 OOF ~~03 tTj x Hl z? OCj 7 0O~r'^t 0 rx3' p ^1M qhy~ Z Oi M ho t~j yH ~o px 0)1 r lg ~p~0 *1°~ny~N Oyx 00 "wb OO a o 00 x zzlCnH m ryyiCMrr~ to nw ' o yxlvo -on Z, Yd b~ r Hi.d~q aM,C~i, x ~T1p£dH £ y Uu NI > ,Z K< r, oyy~~yyAyry °x x 0 y M pzM zh1 Mj pov09CyNyl7xHd nH LOI C) Ic! M N xN M M 17~b HO 0 nz £ y gyy O f.4 xa Mw O 609NZ00ZOOMN ->.q MVidxo q xw Zy MM Z0n6x'~°r+JZ NxM 04 x :4 En En Zz 0'" 'A 7 N N M ~ yNV r Ib [*J M Lei 7~„ ~M,x o 00 tn m* 0 Ot+O?°C~HO~ JxA~ y z~~ ri O° yo 3~ y Me Z WOE °go °p N do D I ~ ~ 0 ;'bz°x o i,OM b 'ZI "n (A w r, H E l b H NKHuo aK 0n A xMO N77o Z m . n H r zC API ri) :4 Z.Ao In ^°*7 oM SIR M d ~4 nh1~On9I- OO'~7y ~0 0 ~Ht~ O N '°N tom 0'*1z 0 0 q bx bv EM~ rH~ [SN~~ V UH~t7N zh b Jb o~fn r'm k5,,mxRJb E o• bx O ~yy M~1 yJn~.tn~F4 > 'y~ ?non~x Lei 3'Vf As } y yZy r pw r ~y~y~yx t' 000 N f' MM0 E~0 tr 2 qq 9 M80r~ trfZzq 4 H 'C z x oot* M '3 Mr tl~ <y ~bn r o°oyy~ zap ' M> zM °h ~~f r ti10MG1• z 'a o m I z o i ta a < o O u (A a O co z o' 0 9 C) D 20 t ~ 40 Y CC r n ob O y r0 UO m o x N 00°00 50"W •b ro m 100 41 p '0 N ro ~ O y u a i rl co t m z < w o O r~ r a ~ ~ ~ ?S M o z NEFF c. :bb STREET L n 2s' ovk .y D (A SOUTH P z o CD (JI o ~ .r° y coi ~ `i N j rn o WELCH °u rn on "1 ~ 80' RIGI U1 " G7 O 't o Z - - D ~im~r! z n i m O~ _ .Zl I!! A rn 0ybZ f 0 dx rO G W I!1 N ~0 a o -I Z x k a V1 Z o Z r. ~ Z Qf VV N D r. 0 m Qo u M o N CA O it O OEY H c~ 0 nH yxof roNm ntn tA~ n 2N a ~f Mng> O M =dM0 r O M:C.In G q ~ UOG7 y00~~ HmC: L M L A >3SGOmgwgoo Zq 4x3 km O E yYro Dyye ` y K yH 'ti aC f7 oO y tzr M r; > y Dr0 f]YM~j~~ M z C *C7oHH"ZZtwq 0*J K~x 4f~ 7C N ~ N K 'yX~fM In ro O O M t=f 0 X,* DW M q z h Mm Z C0yx t*7?C NCO yH yy [[11 (A rrH vvvY z D 2 ]C K y E U1 H Z~ M~ N H tri z h77.70 ,K~ 'F7~ IA~GN~'b`70 U S7Dp v ro H x H HzHtyt7.xx xy X+ ~4 ( 2 ~ t+ 'Grote ttil M tJ [ate .j H • ~ ~ to yD a" to OMp dUMc~~c~x~nz y 2UZ%ro, M ~~++d"O*1V[iy;U t~*1 Z b yYnb'*7m N 00 55M 0 Qz NM O]C+ fFjO~ H0 O 10 H y~ tD Ky ro M+ VI f]Z 2 ~L+ woX ~M JOC Z 'T 0 m o ro 00 E() z r- c y 0 t*7 0 ors H z Z z z 2c Z V PI r j O f yyy Z N Cl) ~j 0 M pn ?p 7 on ~ y to 14 x Z r4 to Dto h~ )0 M0 IdzQ y N sv bay yro0•~ro0 O H O Z ~ z q d z x 0 x y Z3 yK O mnogwgmm 6 t7O'TJ o H C Z r Y 0O V HyyZO~~yy~ = Oi s ntn yMwu ~0 z0q 0. N o z 0 t'7 z Zvi Vl O V W Safe Fire Fighter Staffing Critical Considerations O~`LNIlp0 I~ ~F Cto CLC Department of Research and Labor Issues International Association of Fire Fighters, AFL-CIO, CLC . I Copyright (D 1993 by the Intemalion Association of Fire Fighters. This puhiication is protected by cop)right. No part of it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval systel,r, or transmitted in any form or by any mega, electronic, mechanical. photocopying, recording, orotherMse without written perm itision from the Intemat ional Association of Fire Fighters, Department of Reamarch and Labor Issues. Intemntiomd Standard Book Number. 0.942920-16-3 Foreword Firefighting today remains one of the most dangerous professions in North Arnerica. Despite the many safeguards and technical advances that have been introduced into the fire service over the past 50 )ears, the fact remains that it is a labor intensive job that requires art adequate n um ber of fire fi ghwrs o n sc ene to rdely and e ffecti veiy conduct fi re suppre ssion an d reSe ue set! vat ICS. We have Iruned from grim experience Ihm inadequate staffing on the fireground can result in urmeccssary loss of Iife and serious injury loboth fire fighters and the c id, ens they are swom toprrrlect: Th:u is why knuwlydgeahle professionals have consislentiy suplxorteJ minimum fire riighterstlfting standards requiring at least four personnel on an engine and five on a truck company. A l l 100 often, the issue of fire I ighter staffing boils down to simplistic arguments in a lac ;d budget hattle. Municipal 0ffici,ds, forced to reduce Oie corrununity's annual budget, make :ubiiritrycuts in faire tighterstiffing with4lut Icxiking ai the repercussions- or understanding the direct rdationship between staffing Ievcls, public safety, and the protection of property. Minimurnstdfrng is nolan issue of labxar versus managemcnt,firc fighters versus tire chiefs, large fire departments versus small departments, or career versus volunteer fire fighters. The key element of the sudfing issue is safety. This publication represents the most up-to-date and comprehensive review of the facts, statistics, and issues surrounding fire fighter staffing. It is aimed a1 educating the fire service, municipal officials, and the public about the realities of firefighting, providing many pcrspkwlivcs about staffing from many different sources. It is aimed at saving lives and ensuring that cur communities have an effenive fire suppression force. We hope this manual will heap fire chiefs, fare fighters, local officials, and cit izens to make informed decisions about staffimg issues in their communities. Tat many citizens have lost their lives and possessions in fires and too many fire fighlets have suffered injury or died needlr+sly because fire GghtersLifting levels were inadequate. "his publication is dedicuted to the thousands of fire fighters who have died in the tine of duty and it is our hope that those who study this manual will use its contents to en ure that adequate stiffing 10 Js Ixcome standard operating procedure in all five departments across North America. Alfred K. N hiteheud Ylnrenr 1. Bnrhm General Presldent r;enerA smrernrq.rre+wrer iii { Acknowledgments i The IAFF Deptuament of Research and Labor Issues would I ike to lend its apprec cuion and gratitudetoDavid McCormick, A.ssistanitothe[AFFOeneral President, Richard Duffy. [AFF Direciorof Occupational Health and Safety, and Terry Ohlvm, [AFF Staff Representative, for their input and review of this document. We would like to especially thank Janet Hardy, Dan Barr, and Michele Dove, IAFF Reseamh Assistant+. for the development of this manual and also to Scot Hartwick, IAFF " Resca%h AssistantandSandy Miller, Depanmentof Research A tabor Issues Secretary, for their production efrons. i a IAFF DEPARTMENT (jr RESEARCH AND LABOR ISSCfS Randy Hudgins, Director 1 F Iniematioma! Association of ire Fightem. AFL-CIO, CLC Wpanment of Reaean:h and'.ahor Irsues 1730 New York AvmUe, NV w'ashirpon, Ix' 2MY, ' t8~2i 7d7A3Aa (102) 717 AJ 18 (PAX) v Table of Contents Introduction Chapter 1 Impact of Initial Fire Attack on Property Loss and Chizen Safety .............3 Chapter 2 Staffing for Initial Fire Attack and Fire Fighter Safety ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,7 Fire Fighter Safety and Effectiveness of Initial Fire Attack ......................................7 s National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) „9 International City Management Association (IChIA) „ ...........................................14 Centaur/FEMA Study,.. ............................15 Columbus Stud Seattle Fire Department Study ...,16 Dallas Fire Department Study 18 Fire Department Evaluation Syst:m (FIREDAP) . 19 Enforcing an Industry Standard ...............................................................................20 Metropolitan Fire Chiefs and Minimum Suiffm Increasing Fireground Injuries ............22 Johns Hopkins University 23 Providence, RI Experience 23 Charter 3 ' Lo at Jurisdiction's Overall Fire Protection Requirements .....................27 Rcsponse'rime 28 Minimum Staffing and Response Times Required for Delivery of Emergency Medical Core ........................................................................................29 Tactical Fire Suppression Goals .....................................................30 k+ Bl t+liography,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 35 t Vii Introduction - This manual identifies those benchmarks by which safe and effcctive minimum fire suppression services should be assessed It provides both citizens and municipal officials with the facts they most consider in making informed decisions regarding the appropriate level of service for their communities. Fire fighter st.Lf!ing directly affects delivery of fire protection service and is therefore essential to any discussion or debate involving service levels. It is generally accr pted that a municipality has the right to determine the overall loci of fire protection it wants. However, regardless of the level of fire protection chosen by the citizens, neither they nor their elected representatives have the right to jeopardize the safety of the employees providing those services. Citizens pay for protection of life and property through their lave dollars, and they assume that their elected and appointed officials will make WormM decisions regarding that protection. Too often, that decklon making process No been based solely on budgetary expedience. However. irrespective of the resources provided, citizens continue to believe that fire fighters are prepared io provide an aggressive interior assault on fires, successfully accomplishing victim rescue, fire control, and property conservation. They do not expect fire fighters to take defensive actions, i.e., to simply surround a fire and drown it, because to do so would be to concede preventable loss of both life and property. However, when sta ffmglevelsarereduced,misguidedeconomicsandcommunity expectations collide, with politicians insisting that potential budgetary savings will not affect the level of service. y 'y y a a .t f ~ t Unlesscitiiensunders,and the relalionshipbetweensidling levclsandUuirownlil, sakly and the protection of their property. it is not realistic for fire fghers to expect them to insist on approprinte service levels, including minimum staffing. Elected officials and managers cannot be expected to make appropriate decisions concerning the level of s:rvice without an ! education in effeethe firefighting and tun understanding of the impad their policy decisions have on the cititens they represent. Therefore, it is essential to make clear to the community j that reduced staffing equates to reduced service levels, and that if they a s) CO a conlinuaf aggressive xtack on fires, they must provide the deparunent w^th at least the minimum resources required to meet the community's expectations, To do less forces fire fighters to accept a level of risk to their own heJdt and safety that the cvmmunily at laugc finds unacceptable for itself. I 'r Historically, the standard for rise suppression F t North America has mandated an ofknsh e i attack in s tuations involving struclural fire. St,,dy after study has detnonstraled that itthe hrce available to n:i iate an interior fire attack is less than fifteen personnel, the goals of victim rescue, fire conk sl, and property conservation are seriously compromised. T hese studiesstate that when firegroujA staffing is reduced below the level necessary for aggressive tactics, the inevitable result is that tire fighters must resort to derensive rather thanoffensivcoperations or risk then own safety. N Fire fighting has always been laborintensive and remainsso. Although new technologyhas unproved firefighting equipment and protective gear, it is fire fighters who still perform the t critical busks necessary to contain and extinguish fires. When stifling falls below minimum acceptable levels, so does service, and the goals and exM.t Lions set by the community are essentially abandoned. A numberof court decisions and arbitration awards have recognized that while firefighting is one of the most dangerous occupations in North America. fire fighters should be provided the safest possible working environment. Thus, staffing affects not only the public safety but E also the safety of fire fighters and as such is a condition of employment. Although firefighting is by its nature dangerous, Vial does noljustify employers increasing that inherent levelof risk ? by reducing safe mutimunt staffing under the guise of financial difficulty. F This position has been recognized by many organizations such as the International Association of Fire Figh tees, Sictropolittt Fire Chiefs' Division of the International Assoc ia- s lion of Fire Chiefs and the U.S. Fire Administration. Even the international City Management Association has slated: t' ...roofeK companies or poorly manned ones, can result in property and life fors beyond community accepted norms. Also, the cost of a firefighter death or disabling injury may far exreed the expense ofa fire company. This it not to say that there is a fixed value on a life or injury. The point is that the f refighting forcer are the asset that protects the economic and fax base as well as its health and K elfare. This asset is a valuable one ard must be carefully provided and Wisely managed. 2 Chapter 1 - Impact of Initial Fire Attack on Property Loss and Citizen Safety Successful delivery• of fire protection services involves two major elements - fire preven• lion and fire suppression. Fire prevention can be defined as those "pre fire activiries (hot reduce the probability of fires occurring and help limit the loss of properry and life in the fires char do occur."' Since Gre prevention will never be l 00 percent successful, it is necessary to buttress fire prevention goals with adequate fire suppression services. It is the objective of fire suppression to"gel to the fire as quickly as possible and to extinguish it with minimum i, ss to persons and property from the fire and from firefighting aciNiries.'t The successful atud meni of the goals of both prevention and suppression require a balanced approach and commitment of resources. This balance his in recent years been tipped in the direction of fire prevention while largely Ignoring fire suppression. AS the data In the following table shows, the concern with fire prevention has been substantcdly rewarded. According to the NFPA's Annual Nrtional Fire Experience Survey, the total number of fires, civil ian deaths, and injuries has declined remarkably over the last decade. Thisdataatteststothesubstantial 'unpactthaipublic educa6on,smokedctectors,and development and enforcement of building codes can have on preventing fires. However, closer examination of the same data also tells the other side of the story, which is that de-emphasis of fire suppression in recent years has led to increasing rates of civilian deaths and injuries and property loss when fires do occur. Rrlr Per 1,000 Toll Tolal Total RlrIArMIal Fkat Dkret Pfoprny Aral PmWny Rrrldreltrl CNIMA CNlllan CNlllon Milan Darr For OomW For Trar Fkra Dooft 1*00ii OrMh InluAoa Rrrtdrdualfir Arsldmtlal Fkr Cl 1978 730,500 6,185 21,260 8.47 29.1 $3,001 $4,602 r. 1979 721,500 5,765 20.450 7.99 28.3 $3,505 $4,828 1980 7$1,500 5,446 21,100 7.19 27.9 $4,016 $4,874 1981 733,000 5,540 20.375 786 8 $4,446 $4,891 ! 1981 676,500 4,940 21,100 730 31.2 $4,809 $4,983 1983 641,500 4,820 21,450 7,51 .+3.4 $5,154 KIN a 1984 623,000 4,240 19,275 6.91 30.9 $5,S22 W14 %'•'z'~'+ 1985 622,000 S,023 19,825 8.08 31.9 $6,068 $5,623 1986 581,500 4,770 19,025 8.20 31.7 SQ1lS $51580 1987 SS1,500 4,660 20,440 8.45 37.1 $6,707 $5,004 1988 551,500 5,065 22,600 9.17 40.9 $7,216 $6,150 1989 $13,500 4,435 20,750 8.64 40.4 $7,786 $6,279 1990 467,Or0 4,115 20.650 8.bt 44.1 $9,107 $6,968 1991 478,000 3,575 21,850 7.48 45.7 $11,615 $8,328 1978.84 •14.7% •31.4% •9.3% •19.6% 6.2 84.0% IS.5% 1984.9i .233% •15.7% 13.4% 9.8% 47,9% 110.4% 60.5% • i ~ndereJnd 6fd notl RUM elrt,l rmOMrA~a+t~b)IFe CPFU. SOURCE: National Flre Praleeti0n Assodaiion 3 During the six-ye;at period t 978-K4, rnr,nurc s i.I tv ith lire I, revrnIi ~n,md lire suppressi m rxhihiled egwdly impressive results, 7hrnugI, the cllorts oft! rv lire ventl„n, flo c lnl,d n wnhrr respecIi ol'residenti vcly, al l droeespped hy 3 1declined.4 '141, .7'4, and 9c.3h', ile the tote nwnhc'r of civilian deaths and injuries, . In those situaliom%here tires did txcur•firefighting alsoso ored suhslarili;dgains, During the period, the rde ofcivilian deaths ixr I YA) foes dechned 19.6,f . chile the rare of civilian injuries and real property dunage shoaed only Inodesl incre;ucs, However in the la0erhalf-of thedesade. the results were sarh trwlially different. Bet%ecn 1934 and 1991, the rate of civilian fire deaths per I AX) residential fires increresed 9.8'41 the rote of civilian injuries incre;tsed 47.914 rind real property loss rose 60.5'4. 4 11 4 4! ` i r t ~ f -.1 The ability of adequate lire suppression forces to gfeydy inllucncc the outcome of a structural fire is un Ivniable and predictable, Data generated by the National Fire Protection Association provides empirical proof thm rapid and aggressive interior "it Lack can suhstantially reduce the human and property loss asscx'i;ated with extension beyond the strurturril pres. At each stage of a foe's growsexp<mcnli;dly, room of origin. the role of ci vi ti;tn deaths. injuries, and progeny damage fiA1L': Pfik 1.C0) rrru' ` Aserage Fire F'xtension In Nesidential tilruttures: Deaths [dulries Property Con rn to Dram o )rag n 11 1 11 bama e C'onfincd to t loor of Origin 16e ondVoororOri in 1)3.60 80.4 ~11,11J SO C : , at ono fee 'rafect on Acsoc aNun 27.2J_ S$ 17 12l ,343 s Clearly, an early aggressive and Offensive i ni I ial interior attic k on a work in g structural 111N results in greatly reduced loss of life and properly damage. Consequently, given that the p cults ; A of y structural fire to the point of'Ylashover'{the very rapid spreadingof the f're due to wpel healing of room contents and other combustibles) generally occurs in less than 10 minutes , two ol'the most important elements in limiting fire sprrxl are the quick arrival of suffic lent numbers of personnel and equipment io attack and extinguish the fire as close 10 the point of its origin a9 possible, Fire Propagation Curve tot ~w~rM eoMe+MNE PEM" A RATE 0 OAF MATV" Rim wo nJee~rcN w~ ao WNLVOO"A"'ONe6 TO THE PEIICEMAOE M PPAPrAty OF9TRUCTCN. ATAPPAOWWTELVTEPL M 1T MII SINTO THE PIPE SEWENC6 THE MVIAOTAET CAL fat Room OF OWIN PLA0ME0 OVER . tYrE"at" o 10E p THE ROOM eeOINE AT t"11 POINT 10 14 20 _ Mlnulu l0 0 1 7 1 1 1 1 T J/ it u 0 1 7 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 'J ❑ 0 O '1 0 II Ir 0 II a Jr Q a 11 0 ~----ROOM of Onpin - p Smyond Atom 010499 SOLRCE: John C. Gerard & A. Terry Jacobsen Assuming a crew of five fire fighters is 100% effective in performing the critical tasks required for an interior fire attack, the following table shows the impact that reduced staffing has on the effectiveness of fireground operations involving a single-family residential structure. Impact of Crew Slim of First Akan Aadgnmenl on Fin Attack In a Re ldeatkt Structure let Enalne Comran, , 2nd En lde Com an lfmc LWder Compan Charge Locate Charge Charge Check Initial Interior & lolerlor Sup Exterior Search Exposure Line and Revue porl Line Line& Roof and for Fire Crew Size: A9vaece 1 "Im & Advance Advance entllanoe Rescue ExterWom S Fire Fighters 100.0% 100104 10010% 100.0% 100.4% 100.0".. 100,09E 4Fire Fighters 84.7% 96.19E 77.9% 72.99E 79.0% 9039E 10424 3 Fire F titers 71.3% 82.1% 409E 62.34 0.0% N6% 4.1% SOLRCE: "Dallas Fire Department Starring Level Study"Slclfadls Associate, June 1984. The conclusions reached in the Dallas Study have recently been confirmed for small fire departments by the Westerville, 0h)oFire Department. Using standard firefighting tactics, the results of the Westerville Fire Department study showed Um14 fire fighters could perform rescue of potential fire victims go% faster than a 3 fire fighter creev. 7 The impfic;IGuIIS drat enhanced crew sire c+ur b nc on rescue upccrtions i~:dl 1110 mare dr:unatic when 010 victim sunivahilily is a midered. Dm:i PnnluccJ by 1JW Irdlas 1 irc Np: ronent showed 1hal: nhcn rescue occurred hem-cm 12 and 15 112 noilures, the sand,i ul rum K us 46.6percen r. T he raw dropped io 5 5 ,amen r ,,hair esi ire rice w rerl 6eNcen 15 apid 17 112 minutes Thus, u v:uianceof only 2 to 3 minutes in the speed with which rescuo opieralioni; could he completed can increase fire victim sunivability eight fold. Conseyuendy, the fire s<nice in North America has for most of the twentieth century accepted the premiscand the ezpecLItion that fire fighter s wi II pcrfnnn aggric"ive interior fire attacks when eonfronled with a working suuclurd fire, This las heen and still is the inJusuy,s standard of perfonnance. r, ENDNOTES 1 MEASURING FIRE PRoracn)N PRODUCTIVITY IN LOCAL CovB miNT, PHILIP S. SCHAENMAN AND JOE SWARTZ (BOSTON, MA: NFPA) 1974, P. 5, P 1810.1 P. 30, 3 "REDUCEO STAFFING: AT WHAT COST?," JOHN C. GERARD AND A. TERRY JACOBSEN, F,r.E SERVICE TODAY, SEPTEMEER 1951, PP. 15 AND 17; AND "HAZARD I FIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT METHOD," NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND rECHNOLOGY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, JUNE 1991, 4 NATIONAL FIRE ACADEMY, "MANNtNO LEVELS FOR ENGINE AND LADDER COMPANIES IN SMALL FIRE DEPARTMENTS," (RR No, 14613) RICHARD C. MORRISON. 6 Chapter 2 Staffing for Initial Fire Attack and Fire Fighter Safety The purpose of this manual is io ohjocIh vly relate s,Jfng to fire tighter s;Jely. Disc ussioa of staffing must also address the level of effectiveness of the fire suppression services. his expected that fire fighters will aggressively intervene toextinguishafire, Fire fightcrsafely and the effectiveness of fire suppression service are cluseiy linked. Fire figh!as catnol m;untain the stone level of aggressive fire suppression services whil; receiving fewer and fewer resources. I FIRE FIGHTER SAFETY Inappropriate reductions merely shift the burden of attempting to maintain the expected AND EFFECTIVENESS OF level of service to the fire fighter at the expense of his/her own safety. Consequently. INITIAL FIRE ATTACK fireground productivity and effectiveness are seriously compromised. Over the last 25 years deviations from the industry's standard regarding recommended, acceptable Ieveb of staffing per unit of respe,nse have seriously compromised fire fighter safety. In 1967, the International City Slanagement.%ssociation (1CNIA) recommended that engine companies malnWn a m inimum of 5 personnel, while those (tperating in"high value" areas require 7 personnel. The 1CMA went further to state that "ladder companies are governed by similar manpower considerations. " Citing the reason for these requirements, 1CMA stated: ft is arionuttic that there must be enough men to put fire apparatus into affective use. Three men are needed to ptare a single line of 2112•inch hose in service One additional man is needed to operate a pump, plus a foreman o pumper companies require a mininutm of five men. 7 Thus n reduction in the "industryslauiJard"regarding the agipn opriate level of foe conipa ny staff mg would be justified only in thosecircumauutces where the naaure and numtwr of tasks to be accomplished at any given structund fire by fire suppression personnel were also reduced. Fire suppression has always been labor intensive and a substantial impact' on productivity in the form of reductions in the numbs. personnel required at the company level can only be offset by major advances in wchnology or increased risk to the fire fighter, Someadvanceshave been made in technology. Theindustryhasdevelopcdstate-of•the- art appmutus, electronic communications, self-contained breathing apparatus, and persom;d protectivegear. However, none of thescadvanceshaveeliminatedthe critical tasksthat must be performed by fire fighters at the scene of a structural fire. In fact, these rovances in many ways have been offset by introduction of more harardous materials and construction techniques. New technologies and materials used in construction and furnishings ve more combus- tible and toxic than those in use a qua ner century ago, while advances in such areas as SCBA's and personnel protcxdve gearhavc in some quarters increased the expec tation that fire fighters can perform more aggressive interior fire attacks wM fewer personnel. i i However, just as it is logical to accept that technologies enhancing fire fighter safety also lead to increased fieg,-ound effec dveness, it is also logical to accept that diminished safety correspondingly reduces the effect i veness of fireg round operations. Given that structural fire suppression is so labor intensive, rLJuc t ions in firefighting personnel must inevitably lead to increased injuries unless those reductions areaccc+mpanied by viable alternative techx*igies i or the number of critical tasks that roust be performed arc reduced. f The level oTavailable technology and critical tasks that must be performed at the scene of a structural fire remain essentially unchanged. Today, however, very few jurisdictions < operate units with staffing levels of more than 4 fire fighters, with many now suggesting that ' 2 or 3 fie fighters is an adequate and acceptable level of fire company staffing, But, as an article in Fire Engineering succinctly put it: A football coach who sent hit tram our on the field is iih six men and then i fed the other fire in piecemeal as the game progressed Hould be consideredanidiot. Yrrrhisisrhesamepolicythat nwnycitpoffcialsand v their hired conaaltants are furring on fire chiefs-always in the guise cf r greater efficiency and, of course, economy. t One man cannot be called afire co rnpuny,nomarrerl:ow munymrnare available after he has made a si:eup and hollered fur help. Neither can two or three rnrn be considered a1re company. (There are not enough rohandleafair-si:edgrass r9re.) l i ~ t The requirement for initial arriving apparatus to be staffed with at least 4 personnel to initiate an interior fie attack is not new. it has hen the fire senice standard and industry practice for must of the twcndrth century, as well as recognirel and ncomrncridcxi by the National Fie Protection Association (NFPA) since at last 1962. The adherence to a i minimum level of safety staffing grew out of intuition and expeience and is empirically f F i grounded in results from study after study showing the causal relationship of deficient foreground staffing and increased fire fighter injuries. NATIONAL FIRE StanIn 1966, doe Nadon:J Fire Protection Association issued NFPA Standard 191. Training PROTECTION dard on lnirial Fire Attack. This sutndasd set forth thee volu i ions required for an initirJ ASSOCIATION (NFPA) interior attack on working structural fires. no mi.tlmumstandud -quiredsufftcientnumber offirefighters andequipmenttodeptoytwoattack one-and -one-half inch hose tin esproducing at least 1508pm within 6ii seconds ofarrival, followed by a two-and-one-half inch backup line providing at least 250 gpm within 180 seconds of arrival While the NFPA 197 did not spec ify the number of fire fighters necessary to deliver this required flow, it does specify the tasks that must be performed within a given time period. Although NFPA197was silent on the minimum numberoffire fighters necessary to safely conduct these evolutions, the National Fire Protection Association clearly defined in its book, Fire Att.~k 1. the number of personnel required: Standard initial fire attack for isolated buildings of average sh a such as one- or two-story singte family dwellings consists of ability to quickly apply 1 112-inch attack lines plus at least one standard 250 gpm stream from 2 112•inch hose supplied by a pumper. The tatter is required for knocking down any heasy volume of fire and for protecting exposures where necessary. Such an attack requires two pumper companies with adequate manning to run the lines andoperare the nodes andpumps, plus I a truck company capable of simultaneously performing forcible entry, search and rescue,ventilation,raisingofladders,salvageoperations, and operation of the various poker tools canted on the truck such as electric generators and lights and smoke remov it f quipment. The entire opetit rion is directed and coordinated by a chief officer. i The desirabfr nu her of men narrru t! re ae r ro re mod with the I of performance T1I1Rtl14and rouinment woutd be aoproximstrlvfh en plusthe~jet An aide mho assists the chief in giving orders and in serving as radio communieationsspecialist in contact with the alarm office, suppliesihe chief with one additional man. i , A, The nperation mray be performed oriih slighity less men (but H iih reduced eficiency) where weaker truck service Is provided. In a standard (operation, the truck operator is expected to operate the poker ladder if needed for ventilation, rescue or access, and also to operate auxiliary j power equipment such as generators and io provide the various tools and appliances that are likely to be required during the fire. Therefore, his basic position Is with his truck just as a pump operator or 'engineer' should be provided with each pumper to give the correct volume and pressure to each hose stream, The balance of the truck crew may be divided into teams. One of these teams would normally be assigned to k inside search. rescue, forcible entry and ventilation in support ofthe fire ~i 9 arwrk. Theuthcr K otd,lhe an ouoide crew fi,r raising ladders f up to i5 feet) for possible re.scur as Kell I, for topside vrnt+lurion. ?'hey would also prasirle truck suffi e I f"? hose crew s assigned to the rear ofthe fire building. All truckrnen sh~~uld perform salvage operations as soon as practicable. pD P POO I;J~ tL JJJ}}H~jj~ II/2 © NCH INCH P2 rn= I © O 1 3 0 R 31/2 INCH-SUPPLY LINE © CHIEF 9 0 pUMr.EA COMPANY MEMBERS 1RUCN COMPANY MEMBERS ,I HYDRANT 1 Hose crew requirements are basedupon theneedfor rKomen w properly apply each stream from 1 111-inch hose and three men to effectively operate a 250ppmsirramfroma2111-inchhandline. (UNDERLIN- E IN0 ADDED) I { Hence, adherence to NFPA 191 required two pumpers and a ladder truck with a total complement of at least 15 personnel. NFPA funkier stated thae Q Ordinarily (except is hoer there are major rescue oprratiort.e the grtatrsr manpower is needed for fast application an.f operation, of hand hose streams carried directly to the seat of the fire. Thus, adequate manpom er i on the initially arriOng pumper companies is most essential, andlarge t forces mobilized later cannot be accepted as a substitute for deficiencies c in the manning of rhefirst alarm response. t The NFPA further cross-referenced the initial atalck criteria of NFPA 191 in the BM s Proteclioall11&ILs stating: Regardless of how companies are organised, response to alarms for srrucruralfiresshouldincludesufficirntappararusandnwnpoKerunder at least one chirfojficer. Normally, a minimum initial response wouldbe } tKw ptunpers, a rehirle file truck srrsier, and 11 w 15 men anda chief 'i and An initial response of this level should be able to handle the immediate tactical fire fighting and rescue requirements for slrurtures %here there are no major rescueproblems.no seriousinternal or external exposures, In a I i I I and N here the possi hie area in voh ed in fire, hear or somke normally N ill be less than 11 500 cubic feet. It is important to note that in the past edition of its Managing Fire Services the Inlemational City Ntmagemenl Association not only subscribed to the N'FFA 197 Standard, but also endorsed the National Fire Protection Assoceltion's definition relating to the number of personnel required to conduct these initial interior attack operations. In 1988, a revisedTraining S4vldard on ln4d Fire Attack was adopted as WPA 1410. This revised standard continued to maintain that M c{c{,~~ 1 'n if vn~pJ=~~ E e 1 1~', •I ,x C j The regWreelperfornwneefor handlines shall consist ofobtain ing a water supply through one or N 'o supply lines, placing N-0 initial attack lines in service, and inunediarely backing them up with another line. and ThemalfloN ofiherequiredsireamsshall beaminimumof400gpm. The floN from the ovo initial attack lines shall be a minimum cf 100 gpm, a minimum of 100 gpm from each no::Ie. and The required floN, from the bark-up line shall be a minimum of 200 gpm, II r' 4 NFPA 1410 Training Standard on Initial ANack .dso linked fur the fast tirne Nrs mncl requirements nceessary for interior fire attack and fire lighter safety. Appendix A•3.2,1 of NFPA 1410 stales: The limitation of emergency scene operations to those that can be safely conducted by then umber cjpersonnelon the scene is intendedtoreduce the risk of fire fighter death or injury due :o understaffing, while members may be assigned and arrive at the scene ofan incident in many different ways, it is strongly recommended that interior firefighting operations nor be conducted without an adequate nundserofqualified firefighters operating in companies under the supervision of company off rers. It is recommended that a minimum acceptable fin company staffing In-el consist of four members responding on or arriving Kith eaa h engine or aerial ladder company responding to any type Jf+re, Com- panies responding in high-risk areas should have a minimum accept- able staffing of sirfi re fighters per ladder company andfi ve fire fighters r ~ per engine company. These recommendations c, e base Ion experience from ac1ualfires and in-deprh fire simulations, crirically andobJec Lively j evaluating fire company efjrectiveness. These studie! indicate signifi- cant reductions in performance and safety hen i reK's have fewer a 1 members than the above recommendations. Ove+all, five-member crews were found to provide a more coordinated approar! jor search and rescue and fire suppression tasks. ($eeNFPA IS00 Standard on Fir Droarement Occltpadona! g cyan fealrhProgram, A-6.2,1.) a (UNDERLINING ADDED) a This Language in NFPA 1410 for complying with safe minimum staffing per unit also ap" in NFPA 1500 Standard on Fire Department Occupational Safety and Health Program: The limitation of emergeneyscen a operations to those that ran be safely conductedbyrhenumbc!ofpersonnelonthesceneisintendedtoreduce the risk of fire fighter death or injury due to understaffing. While members ran be assigned and arri ve at the seen a of an incident in many t different ways, it is strongly recommended that inferior fire fighting y operations not be conducted without an adequate number of qualified 1 firefighters operating in companies under the supenvision of company p office rs. 'i It is recommended that a minimum acceptable fire company staffing Invel should be4 members responding on orarriving with each engine and each ladder company responding to any type ff+re.Theminimum acceptable staffing level for companies respond ng in high-risk areas should be 5 members responding or arriving K i6i each engine company and 6 members responding or arriving Kith each ladder company. These recommendations are based on e.tperience Jerived from actual fires and in-depth fire simulations and are the result of critical and 11 niww• i obfectivrevaluation offirecompany effectiveness. These studies indicate sign f canrreductions to performance and safety where crews have fewer members than the above recommendations. Overall, S member crews were found io provld , a more coordinaiedapproach for search and rescue anditre suppressio-. rusks, During actual emergencies, the effectiveness of companies can become critical to the safety and health of fire fighters. Potentiaily faral work environments can be created very rapidly en many fire situations. The training and skills of companies can make a difference in the need for addittunal personnel and in reducing the exposure to safety and health risks to firefighters %hrre a situation exceeds their capabilities. This direct linkage between NFPA 1410 and NFPA 1500 specifically indicates that the number of personnel required to successfully conduct an initial interior fie attack is not just ` a service issue but most Importantly an issue of fie fighter safety. Acknowledging this linkage, the National Fire Protection Association again endorsed a minimum initial attackslaffinglevel.inits1991versionoftheFire Protectia„ .ed 9ok.the NFPA produced its most strongly worded statements on fieground staffing to date: The effectiveness of pumper rompan ies must be measured by their ability j to get required hose streams into service quickly and efficiently. NFPA " 1410, Training Standard on Initial Fire Attack, shouldbe used as a guide lit measuring this ability, Seriously understaffedfirecompaniesgeeteratly are firm red to the use of small hose streams until additional help arrives, y Often this action maybe totally ineffective in con raining even a small fire ti and in conducting effective rescue operations,' f. and Critical task analysts lndicares that fewer than eleven f re fighter: would r be most hard pressed to accomplish safe, effecrive, initial interior fire attack in atimely mannerata detached single family dwelling. r 4 l i 1 ~ i~. I~I } k r;. to r The NFPA went fuser in its recommendations as to theriu r of txrsontra and eyuipmenlnecess: so rfrnnaninterior strudur:ditreanackby I of Ward'utvotveda, follows: )plea n I a Attac Response Caps I It), Assum nl; nterior ttac an O entlunsResponse CapablYl_ - (Schools, hospitals, nursing homes, explosive plants, refineries, high-rise buildings, and other high life hazard or large fire potential occupancies) At least 4 pumpers, 2 ladder trucks (or combination apparatus with equivalent capabilities), 2 chidoffcer, and other specialired apparatus as may be needed to co with thecombustibleirss'olved,notless than24fuefi htersat' chic fofficers. (Apartments, offices, mercantile and industrial occupancies not normally requiring extensive rescue or fire fighting forces)i At least 3 pumpers, I ladder truck (or combination apparatus with equivalent capabilities), I chief officer, and other specialized apparatus as may be needed or available; not less than 16 fire fighters and l chic( officer, l A,sr•ktgiard (k euuancles (One, Iwu- or three •fam ily dw rll ing s and scaucred s mall businesses and industrial occupancies) At least 2 pumpers, I ladder truck (or combination apparatus with equivalent Ma capabiities), I chief officer, and other specialized apparatus as may be needed or available, not less than 12 fire fi hters and I chief officer. Rural (Scattered dwellings, small businesses, and farm buildings) At least 1 pumper with a large water tank (500 gal11. 9ml1 or nvitc), one motnle water supply apparatus (1000 gal l3.78m31 or larger), and such other specialized apparatus as may to necessary to perform effective initial fire fighting operations; at least 12 rue fighter and i chief officer. At least the equivalent of that required for Rural Operations for second alarms, equipment as may be needed according to the type of emergcncy and capabHities of the rite department. This may involve the immediate use of mutual aid companies until local forces can be su Iementedwithadditionaloffdutypersonnel, In some communities, single units are "special called" when needed, w iihou t o 1w ay% report- In g to a multiple alarm. Additional units also m ay be needed to JIM at least some empty Cite stations. INTERNATIONAL CITY tnits secondeditionofhlWiD1FireServicespublishedin 1986,thelnternatiorWCity MANAGEMENT Management Association (ICMA)supponedthe minimumlevel for safe ftrejoundstafring I ASSOCIATION (ICMA) called for in NFPA 141o and NFPA 1500: Fire suppression operations have three basicjunrlions: (l) rescue, (2) 1111 work involving the ladder, forrible entry, and ventilation; and (3) the application ojwater through hose lines, Rescue and ladder companies handle the first rtao, and engine companies the third. To raise ladders, ventilate, search, and reseue simultaneously lakes quick action by at least four andofien eightormoref+refrghters, each team under the supervision ojan of cer. The nUmber offirefr8hrers required ro search and rescue should neverbejewerthan nroand rypicallyatleasijour, Thenumber offirefrghters needed to advance and operafe one hose line varies from two on smaller lines lo four on large hand lines. e T''he standardjormula for determining the valume of water nreded and the number of hose lines to be advanced ai a working sirucidral f r e is based I( i on a minimum oftwo engine companies with at least eighrfirefighters. This f irmulu calls fir the discharge of three gallons of rarer per minute for every 100 cubi r feet of inivolved fire area u i th typical fire loading. An area of 40 jeer by 40 feet with 8-foot ceilings requires 384 gallons per minute. T>,ohose lines areneeded toproduce tlsatflow,andathird line to cover the floor above. Exposure coverage and search and rescue are not yet taken into consideration, but already eight or nine hosemen are needed, plus the pump operators, plus the supervisor. Various controlled and statistically based experiments by some cities and universities reveal that if about sixteen trained firefighters are not operating at she scene of a working fire within the critical time period, then dollar loss and injuries are signifiean sly increased, as are the square feet of f re spread, As firefighting tacrics m ere conducted for comparative pup poses, five. person fire suppression companies xere judged io be 1 oo percent effec• rive in their 4ukperformance, four-person companiesM percent effec- tive,andshree-personcompaniesJSpercerteer,five;si.xpe~sofeconipa- rues are judged 10 percens faster Than four person compani es. CENTAURlFEMA T'helinkageM, %ccnfirefightergdayandthenumber ofpersonnetontheinitialfire attack STUDY hasbeen demonstrated in study after study. In 1982, the U.S. Fire Administration conducted a survey of over 150 fire departments as to cuff erit crew size and standard response practices. When asked to identify those factors that were most important in determining crew size and initial response, fire chiefs and city managers ranked crew safety at the top of the list. M 1 u i COLUMBUS STUDY Ohio state University, in a 1980 study of actual freground operations of the Columbus, Ohio Fire Departmenl, developed data on fire fighter injuries ar,d rare of fire spread involving 404 structural foes. The data showed 6,at when the rota] number of Fire fighters at the scene fell below 15 the rate of fire fighter injuries per l0 residential structural foes increased 46.7'7. and the number of fires which spread beyond 25 square feet per 10 residemt ial Fires increased 249x. RATE PER 10 FIRES Number of Fires Fire Which Spread FIF.bter Beyond 25 Firearound Starfing: fa ter&s Square Feet 1. Residential 23 3,6 Less Than 1S Fire Fighters 2.9 15 or More Fire Fighters is 4Ls 22.156 Difference 11. Large Fire Risk 4 Less Than 23 Fire Fighters ;'a 2 9 23 or More FireFlghters 715 % 171Difference SOURCE: Obin Stale University The data associated with large risk fires such as high-rise apartments, etc., showed that staffing had an even more dramatic impact onfire riighterinjuries. Whenfvegroundstatfmg was reduced in those types of structural fires to less than 23 personnel, the rate of fire fighter ! injuries per l0 structural fires increased 73.5%, while the number of fires which spread beyond 25 square feet per 10 fires increased nearly 17,29•x. SEATTLE FIFE In 1982, the NFPA's Fire Sendre Today published the results of a study conducted by the DEPARTMENT STUDY Seattle Fire Department. Based on a series of textbook training drills and live fire drills, the Seattle FiireDepartmentcalculaied model e ffectiveness indices of various levels of manpower as follows: 3 Person 4 Persai . 5 Pers 6 Ptt5on Engine 4S% 59% 79% 100% Ladder NIA 5758 78% 100% These effectiveness indices related to the time required to successfully complete all the given tasks required by a particular evolution in the initial fire attack. The study concluded that, These effectiveness indices relate to the time taken to accomplish an objective. A large index means a shorter time. Specifically. ifa six-man engine takes3 minutes to accomplish an objective, a thret-man engine will require 3 +.43 = 11.1 minutes to accompfish the same objective; a foar- man engine Will rake 3 +39 = 83 minutes, anda jive-man engine will rake 611 minutes. (Sraide did not examine levels of rriampower greater than six men.) The same process was used to compare ladder company nroluiion times, i 16 i The conclusion is that doubling the manpox er from three to six men more than doubles the team's effectveness. There is a synergeiic• effect at work While the Seattle Fire Deparunent's main objective %;ls to produce an appropriateness of Service mcAct, unpublished data on fire lighter injuries relating to various levels of staffing were;dso examined. At the time of the Seattle study, the fuedepament consistently operated engine and truck companies with varying levels of staffing, To lest the relationshipbutwcYn k stdfmg effectiveness and fire fighter injuries, Ton Cushman of the Seatile Fire Department, s undertook three separate analyses over a 5-year period. The resuhs of each analysis yielded the same results: Average timeperdisability increased ascompany strength decreasedfar both types of companies. One analysis performed by Cushman examined the Seattle Fire M-parunent's disability report statistics. The results of this analysis indicated that the rate of fire fighter injuries expressed as total hours of disability per hours of fxeground exposure were 547 grader for engine companies staffed with 3 personnel when compared to those staffed with4 fire fighters, while companies staffed with S personnel had an injury rate that was only one-Hurd that associated with 4-person companies. Average, an• Total Total Total Frequency everty Hours Per Disability Number Man-Hours (C01umnA4 (Columnk4 Unit Disability Hours Disablitles At Fire Into M3) Inta02) " 3-Stan Engine 90.607 2,537 28 12,660 .00211 .20 r 4-Man Engine 58.375 1,401 24 10,460 .00229 .13 5-plan Engine 49.500 99 2 2,125 .00094 .05 6-Man Engine 59.517 1,726 29 12,924 .00224 .13 4•ManLadder $8,000 986 17 3,964 .00429 .25 5-Man Ladder 10.455 450 22 4,895 .00449 .99 6•hlan Ladder 45157 642 14 6 3b6 .00220 .10 SOURCE: Seattle Fire Department An even more telling statistic aerates to severity rates in Cushman's subsequent arvilySis that also concluded that average hours per disability associated with 3 -person eumpany staffing was nearly 50% greater than those occurring when units were Staffed with 4 and S personnel. 17 , k 1 The Dallas Fire Dep.'irunent,bi 1969a dagainin 19R4,alsoconductiedtcxtNx)kdr 1kand f)ALLAS DEPARTf FIRE FIRESTUDY live rtrejests tocompaveeffectivenessamong various levels ofsudfing, Thestudy conciuded thatdcricientlevelsof staffing willresult inan inability tocovercritical links. AsthenumTxrs of rite fighters decmwse without eliminating any of the tacks to be accomplished the, Department must delay some of the required disks or attempt to perfonn all the tasks unrdely with inadequate staff. i Consequently, the Dallas Fire Department concluded that in a residential fire, The five-person crews demonstrated a more coordinated and effective aitackort the fire and search and rrscuroperation, while 1 The four-person crew was capable ofperforming sat, ,facto, ily in rontrof- ling the fire and in effecting the rescue operation. The study's conclusion regarding the dvee-person crew was that not all the required critical j laskscould be accomplished within a given time span. Regarding the three-person crew. the 1 report stated: At this levrl there was lirdemargin forerrorand uny appreciable delay in arrival might place the control of the fire beyond their capability, This Is an extremely important statement given that the Dallas Fire Depa nment took great care to insure that improvements in the time it took to complete each critical task was not made at the expense of sound operating practices or safety. However, this would not be the situat ion in actual fireground operations. Fire fighters operating in understaffed environments are too often expected to perform beyclM their capabiIiIies. j The Dallas study, in addressing this Issue, Indicated that inadWuate staffing resulted in: i i • Acumulativeeffectcreatedbycombineddelaysandlost functionsonthe part of each crew resulting in an even greater loss of overall effective- ness: Increased physiological stresson eve fighters as they try to compensate for the lower staffing level; and Increased risk to the rue righters when aggressive procedures are p undertaken without the support necessary to complete theca safely. The National Fire Academy also noted in a research protect developed for its Executive Development III Program that:, ;i ,a In 1977 a rest was conducted by the Dallas Fire Department, which ronsi.rted ofa simulatedfire involving several rooms ar the rear of the third floor ofanoldschool. This simulaiedfrewasbeing done todetermine how long it took a three, four, or fire man team to advance its line to this area, get warer on the fire, and to check each individual s physical rondition 1 :1 afterwards. Timing began as each engine company entered the school yard. 'y is -,Pin6:h~ 1 k4 he average time of the Ergine Companies is revealing. The first consisted of a three-Horn ream and their average Has IS JS minutes. All personnel were exhausted, rubber legged, haddiff+culry standing upand all three were unfit fur fiather fire fighting The four-man team conducting the very same test, averaged 10.29 minu fey and upon completing they were nearing rxhaustion. Next came the five-man [earn which averagd! 6,15 minutes, and after- wards all shored little evidence of fatigue: The Academy's project report went on further to state: The implication is that when a smaller workforce, using the same heavy equipment, has to do the job that was done in the past by a larger vi orJ;force, injuries of this nature will continue to inerease. Injuries to back and knees are Injuries that take a long time to correct. The cost to the city and department are heavy: FIRE DEPARTMENT In Dccemberl991,thePhoenix, Arizona Fire Departmenit dc veloped the Fire Uepariment EVALUATION SYSTEM Evaluation System (F1REDAP) to precisely identify the components Td objectives for ttack. This evaluation EVALU DAP} complying with NFPA's 1410 Training Standard on Initial Fire Attack.' system involved responding to and extinguishing a working fire in a single story residential structure of 2,000 square feet with no exterior exposures, The Department concluded that to safely conduct an aggressive interior attack based on standard evolutionsand the critical tasksthat needed lobe accomplished required 15 personnel distributed as follows: 4 personnel on each engine ' g personnel 4 personnel 4 personnel on tack - 2 personnel 2 personnel to BC vehicle - l personnel on utility vehicle = IZIWAW TOTAL 15 personnel It is Important to note that the Phoenix study indicated that one of the primary obJeclives of the fast arriving engine company was to" midi:e hose lint for fire control and personnel protection." It should be further noted in the Phoenix study's findings that the initial attack ultimately } required at least IS personnel on the scene. This i3 consistent with previousQ NFPA'sFtrAl ~ck•l. studies such t t the Wlas, Ohio State University and Seattle studies, ICSI 's _SlanTraining5t rdon NFPA'sa'te~11inatbx'k, andNFPA's ' lnirialAuack. These studies not only form the basis for the'•industry standard and practice" for training 19 ( but also are the h;usisfor tho actual response losiruciurd fires which wits require aEgressive and offensiveartions including interior anzK k. ENFORCING AN It was this concept of ignoring "industry slandard.c'•that wasUichasisofa19A9compl;unl INDUSTRY STANDARD filed by the Division of Occupa donl Safety and Health of the Nevada Dcpartincnt of Indus tri;lROations against theClark CountyFire Dep;utmen1. Nevada OSIWsreguhaions m,ainnln that an employer shall not, Require, pernid or saffer any ernploYee to go or be in any emplownent or place of employment which is not safe and healthful. Fail toTarnish, provide and use safely d:vices and safeguards or fad l to adopt and use methods and processes reasonably adequate to render such employment and place tfemployment safe and healthful. Fail or neglect to do every other thing reasonably necessary to protect the life, safety and health of such employee...,, Citing that the Clark County Fire Department had prior knowledge that uruLS sLdfed with three personnel were unsafe, N.D.01K issued a complaint that the Fire Department had willfully violated the Industry standards relating to fire fighter safety. In late 1990, the N. D.O.S.H, agmed to vacate the violation when the Clark County Fire Department stipulated that it would immediately "maintain minimum slafirng levels at each fire starion so that no engine or ladder truck shall be dispatched from afire station, manned with less than jour persons." i In addition, the stipulation entered Into by the Fire Department stated Ihal; Any engine or ladder track manned with less than four persons shall be defined robe "unsafelymanned, " Ik; 1 The body of evidence and industry practice over the last quarter century certainly indicates that the adherence 10a minimum safe fireground suJfing Iv vel is professional ly appropriate. METROPOLITAN FIRE Attheir1992atnnuadmecting,theMetropolitanFire Chiefs Division of thefAFCnolonly CHIEFS AND MINIMUM endorsed the assembly ofatleast four fire fighters hcdoreinitiulingan interior aiuck,butwont STAFFING furtherstalingt In order ro permit the effective operation of fire companies at the scene ofa strueturefare, the minimum number ofpersonnel on both engine and ladder companies should be fire members per unit. In support of its position and addressing the impact that inadequate fireground staffing has t. on fire fighter safety, the IAFC's hlctroChic rs listed the following point.: Afire company should be able to funcrion as an independent unit ur the scenenfafire in order ro permit the Incident Commander to employ the m r a~.ra 1 I j proper tuctics and strategies to safeguard the occupants of the building, as well as fhe operating force, and to pro fect the property of the ciri:ens. i Whenever underslaf ng necessitates the conibinahon of two cot"pan tes so accomplish a specific task at the scene of afire. H hich normally could be cornpleled by one effective unit, the standard operating procedures are dramatically and adversely affected. Proper fire fighting procedures require strategies that result in the rommirmentof fire companies not only to the area insolvedon arrival, but to the internal und external exposures as well, if the endangered cifitens ec, are to be safeguarded and the property damagedlimited, Understafng prevents the Incident Commander from achieving these essential objet lives. To justify the position taken by the Metro Fire Chiefs, there is sufficient } documentation available that indicates increased Injury rates to occu- pants and fire fighters, as hell as higher properly losses, are due to an inadequare firefighting force at the scene of a fire. The Metro Chiefs recognize that current economic difficulties are tifect- ' ingpublic safety organisations nationwide but these factors do not alter the tasks that must be accomplished at the fire scene, The decline in the number of members per unit, as well as the reduction u;, l in the nurnher of fire companies In cities, have already reached a s ? dangerously low level, To accept or support further reduclions is Inappropriate, funding to provide h '1 Any fire chief who attempts to oblain sufficient 1 adequate personnel for the protection of the community he serves, even he fails, is performing his sworn duty to the best of hisability. In doing so, 3 `I he is conscientiously Informing the elected officials and the citizenry of their needs according to his profession a! judgment and experience. i'• i We believe that our, the Metro Fire Chiefs, position is strong enough to staffing. all fire chiefs in their efforts to obtain adequate stoff 8. k l Thisfirmposi6onhasbeentokenbytheMetro Chlejssole lyintheinretost of she safety of both those we serve and our nation's fire fighlers. .t , _,3 I i 7t s 0 p' INCREASING Since the NFPA NO Sr up, J~ud on Fir l- 0h71i10 IM" 111 O 'tad ~rtiesr l IIf~N lircvh~nl FIREGROUND INJURIES Program was promulgated, the avenge annual rate of lire In1urPc' increased by 5,7X as the lahlo helow show's. Rate or Fire Fighter Fireground Injuries Per 1,OOO Fires ,mu eln alauon, oun Dislocations, Average Frye Injuries, Fractures, Hears Allack, ()verPeritd Tut 41 Burns Strains and Sprains 1981.1986 25.22 8.89 13.54 19874991 26.66 7.77 15,48 %Change S.7% (12.6%) 14-3% NOTE: Prior to 1981, data was not classified in same manner. 11 A ''I A, I'lit altona are 11 xpertence urrey Comparing the average annual rate oftiregroundinjuries forthesit•ycarperiod priortothe prumulgationof NFPA 1500 to the five-year post NFPA 15W period reveadsthat those injuries (i.e., smoke inhalation, eye injuries and hums) most c lonely associated with SCB A usage anj Personal protective equipment declined by 12.61X. On the other hand, the rat; of fireground injuries for those injuries (i.e., wounds, dislocations, fraeu res, hcaut attacks, strains and sprains) asstx)nled with undersutffe':i fueground operations increased by 14.111. In 1990, the [AFF's Death and Injury Survey recorded a severity rate of 5,605 lost work hours from job related injuries and illness per IW fare Fighters. Just twelve inonihs later, the , ~f i 1 01 y ~rS 4/'~ t 21 v~ data for 1991 revealed that the rate of lost work time resulting from fire fighter injuries had increased 10% to 6.166 hours per 100 fire fighters. JOHNS HOPKINS A recent study produced by the 1AFF with the cooperation of Johns Hopkims Universityalso UNIVERSITY reflects the fact that fire righter injuries are significantly influenced by inadequate staffing. This analysis compared the rate of injuries per 100 fire fighters and per 100 alarms for cities operating 4 person staffing versus those opentiN 3 person u !c. The artaalysis showed that.: Cities which operated fire suppression companies with less than 4 personnel had an injury rate per 100 workers that was 36.3% greater than those cities which had staffing levels of 4 or more; • The,wrcentageof6deshaving an injury r.teofI0injudesormorepcr 1011 fire fighters was nearly double for those operating with less than 4 person crews as compared to those cities operating with minimum staffing levels of 4 or more; Fire fighter injury rates per 100 alarms were an average of 38% greater in cities with minimum staffing of less than 4 personnel per unit; and c'. 72.5% of the cities staffing with less than 4hadan injury rate per 100 alarms of 0.5 or greater compared to only 35.39E of the cities staffing ?.>t with at least 4 per fire suppression unit. y ,h Tests for stai isd cal sign ificance on this data established that such difference 9intheinjury rates associated with 3 versus 4 person staffing are not due to random chance. FROYIDENCEr RI ThesIgnif:canIcffectthat incre:cingstaffrngfrom 3to4can have ontherateOffirefighler EXPERIENCE injuries Is apparent from a recent trial experience In Providence, Rhode Island. Inorderlotest t the hypothesis that 4 person staffing was safer than units staffed with only 3 fire fighters, the City agreed to provide 4 person minimum staffing on 6 of its 15 units and examine the results. As the following table shows, the resulting 55.4% drop in fire fighter injuries was so dramatic that the Mayor entered into an agreement with the local union to a xtend the 4 fire fighter minimum staffing level to all 15 of the Providence Fire Department's fire suppression units. a. v 21 Q i CONIPARESONOFNil RYRATESINPRtrYIPENCE,RIIOAEISL%%I) FOR 3 PERSON YF:RSL'S4 PERSON STAFF'E.NG % Grc rease of Emergency InEmer• Fire Injurlesat Scene genc) Scene Supprescfan IireFighters Number or Emergency Injuries Injuries Year Incidences On-Duty Fire Fighters Scene Per 100 FT Per 1001 F 1989 1,869 83 479 431 90.0 1990 3,871 89 479 339 70.8 21.35E 1991 4,143 98 479 192 40,1 43.4% TOTAL DECLINE 55,4% In 1989, min mumstafingperplecewas personnel leginn nq nSeplembero 1990, 6 unitse'eremuffed ssith 4 personnel through overtime; beginning In October or 1991, x1115 units were starred eith 4 personnel through overtime, Clearly, the evidence establishes the connection between stafibig and fire lighter lire. ground injuries. So long as understaffed fire suppression units are expected to initiate and Perform sustained interiorattackoperations involving structural fires, the rateof ftreground injuries will continue to increase at alarming rates. sf f , 'r 1 I E i s r v i I i i ENDNOTES 1 MUNICIPAL FIRE ADMBJISTRATV]N, INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION {CHICAGO, IL: ICMA)1967, pp. 161.162. 2 °'MANPOWER - HOW MUCH DO YOU NEeD?,f1 JAMES F. CASEY, FIRE ENGINEERING, OCTOBER 1969, P. 112. 3 FIRE ATTAgK-1 COMMAND DECISIONS AND COMPANY OPERATIONS, WARREN Y. KIMBALL (BOSTON, MA: NFPA) 1966, pp. 20.21. IBID., P. 44. S B OTECTION HANDBOOK. 13TH EDITION, NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION FI (QUINCY, MA: NFPA)1969, PP. 10.24 AND 1D-25. 6 MANA01NG FIRE SERVICES. INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (WASHINGTON, DC: ICMA)1979, P. 80. STANDARD ON FIRE DEPARTMENT O=UPAT*NAL SAFETY AND HEALTH PROGRAM, NFPA N0.1600, NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, 1992, APPENDIX A44.1. 8 FIRE PROTECTION HANDBOOK, 17TH EDITION, NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASsocIAmm (OUINCY, MA: NFPA) 1991, P.10-41. 99 IBID., P. 10.40. 10 MANAGING, FIRE SERVICES. 2ND EDITION, INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION ASHINOTON, DC: ICMA)1988, PP. 119.120. 1 "REPORT ON THE SURVEY OF FIRE SUPPRESSION CREW SIZE PRACTICES, " CENTAUR ASSOCIATES CONDUCTED FOR FEMA, JUNE 30, 1962, PP. 18.20. 12 "SEATTLE'S SERVICE LEVEL MODEL," NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, FIRE SERVK:f TODAY, JANUARY 1962. 13 &DALLAS FIRE DEPARTMENT STAFFING LEVEL STUDY." MCMANIS ASSOCIATES S JOHN T. O'HAGAN & ASSOCIATES, JUNE 1984, pp. 11.1 THROUGH U-7. 14 IBID., P.1.2. 15 "FIRE ENGINES ARE BECOMING EXPENSIVE TA7D CABS-INADEOUATE MANNING," NATIONAL FIRE ACADEMY, EXEOUTIVE DEVELOPMENT IU PROGRAM, 1981, P. 4. . r 16ISID., P. 2. Y6 17 "FIRE DEPARTMENT EVALUATION SYSTEM (FIREDAP)," PHOENIX, AZ FIRE DEPARTMENT, DECEMBER 1991, P. I. 18 STATE OF NEVADA NRS 618.385. c d itr: r x c i Chapter 3 Local Jurisdiction's Overall Fire Protection Requirements In any community, the level of service provided by the fire department is based on rac tors such as community exportations, financial resources, and political decisions. Fue fighter safety and requirements for performing successful interi or structural fire attacks should not be subject to political debate, These precepts are best described in a statement by the International City Management Association (ICbtA): The fire control system is by far the most costly element of a fire department's operations andshouldbedesigned andoperaredinrhenwst cost-effective fashion. (The valueof'cost•effertiveness' is derermined by defin ition at each local level ofgovernment and mil vary from community to community. This variation results from the process of balancing the accepted or tolerated riskagainstthe actual risk in each commun icy.) One three arfourmancompany costs several hundreds ofthousandsofdollars peryear. Afire control company not neededorpoorlyutili:edrepresents a significant financial Haste. On the other hand, too few cmWanies or poorly manned ones. can result in proper and life loss beyond commu. truly accepted norms. Also the cost of a firefjghter death or a disabting iniurvmavfarexceedihe=en eofalirecomaany Thisienottosaythat t there isatuedvalueonalift oriniury The point is that the firCRyhring forces are the asset that protects the rommu n i fy's economic and tax base as well as its healrh and we(lare. This asset is a valuable one and must be < carefullyorovided a ndwise),ymanaped ,i There is no single problem orsolurion ro be found when a communiry'sf re control system is designed, although many f re chiefs and managers are engaged in just such a search, But such an attempt merely illustrares a lack ofunderstanding of the eonTlexities of K hat constitutes an adequate fire protection delivery system. (UNDERLINING ADDED) in its 1989 edition of Managing Fire Services, ICMA suggested an overall master plan for providing safe and effective fire suppression services: A prudent response pattern needs quick response times as well as a sufficient number of firefightersfor the immediate urlack. Officials need io establish a maximum response time following receipt of the dispatch instructions al the station, in some urban areas, one and a hallminutes are considered a desirable maximum, whereas in other urban areas the number is set at No and a halfor three. Obviously, the response lime polie;v varies accordi ag to the fire danger, the ability of the munici- i 17 f puluy to !orate stations and .vuff apparunis, wed rraff c speed. Aeeruge urban response speed is usuuily about 20 mules per hour. One e jre apparatus and personnel arri ire ache sce+te, their in itial ociivities require several more minutes. Considering that the time required for fla.shuver in structural fires pith standard fuels is typically aForn sewn minutes, the apparatus and fire. fighters mail arrive and get operating very quick!-v. !fit takes a resident two or three minutes to diseoverand report afire and three rain uresfor the apparatus to be dispatched and wrive, the si: ing up undinitialattack need to be done in a minute or two, or the typical fire will have groirn significantly in si:e. An unconscious person with depleted oxygen will typicallysuffer perntament brain damage after approximately four min. ales. All ofthis needs to be considered within the context ofmultiplealarm fires and simultaneous alarms. Delayed response and understaffed response appear inevitable under those circumstances, unlessplanningis complete. Onetask then in malt atinrt sunoression ability is to dererminehos: fry adequate firCfighting forces can arrive at the scene of an i=LJ ppd launch rescue operations, ifreeded. plus initial fire attack Once the communiryor the evaluation team has determined satisfactory parameters for the si:e c fthe initial attack team and response time and has measured the local situation, it can judge how satisfactory the response is. Menih resrsansetime ietonacc Than officials evpecred etpeciazilheu~=1 is measuredfrom the moment the alarm w r e rerrlve i to the actual initial attack. Tram si:emaynoibesat4fectorvuniilseyeralvehiclesarrise anti this time delay must be considered as well The r~cienrv nfrh atrork J team will b~ great(v dintini rhed i f an optimum number are notworkinr at rhescene. (UNDERLINING ADDED) Thus. ifsucceacful~~d~,f initial interior structural fire attack minimally requires at least s 4 fire fighters arriving with the fist due engine; and s total fireground resources of 15 to 16 personnel staff. ing 2 pumpers and I ladder truck. The only additional piece of the equation is response time. I I RESPONSE TIME Response time involves four elements: delection lime, alarm process:,g time,lumout time M andtrtveltime. For the first of these elements - detectiontime- noreliablesLuaoranalysis exists. iY ti. However, for the two elements imvoh-ing alarn Processing' and turnout time" the Inlernatipal Association of Fire Chiefs' Accreditation Committee recently completed an analysis. The study Indicated that In "staffed depasimenis" the average time required to process the anon was 53.76 seconds, while the average turnout time wm 57.55 seconds. 2a r fi s On the haois of the International City management Association SIACInent that lire apparatus in an urban selling can average about 20 miles per hour, irmel time invoiving dislncesof Imileis;tpproximalely3minutes, Therefore, the toudaverage respcrosetime of "staffed departments" approximates 5 minutes from receipt of the alarm to auriv;d al the scene. MINIMUM STAFFING AND The response times for fire suppression arealsoconsistentwith thoserecommended bythe RESPONSE TIMES AmedcanWail Associalion(AHA)fordelivery of pre -hospital emergency medical care. The REQUIRED FOR AHA's emergency medical services maximum response time recommendation hms been 4 minutes for initiation of basic life support (BLS) and R minutes for initiation of advanced life DELIVERY OF support (ALS). EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE Recently the AHA reconfirmed this recommendation by stating; For cardiac a rres r, the highest hospital discharge rate has been achieved in pal irnis in xlwntCPR x as initiated within 4 minutes ojarrest and ACLS wiihin8ntinutes. Early by.,tanderrescue brewhingorCPRintervenrion and jllSLernereency medical sen•ices It6 1 response are therefore j essenrialinimnravinQsunrt~ NDERLININGADDED) j In 5992, the Natiou;d Conference on Cardiopulmon,•vy Resuscitalion and Emcrguncy Cardiac Cue, listed among iLa recornmendauione that all fire-fighting units be equipped with and trained to operate automatic external defibrillators and the following recommendation regarding minimum staffing per EMS response: EarlvACLS provided by paramedics at the scene is another critical fink in the nuinagemenrafeardiacarrest• EAIS systems should have sufficient if a j ati, r j ;i ~y r s yc; a7 , I Y 4 29 k 1 t t stafjingtop rovideaminirnumoft orescuerstrainedinACLStorespond to the emergency. lloK,ever, because of the difficulties in treating cardiac arresiin thefield,additional responders shouldbepresenr lasvstrrnur a hhfvs eurruin 1survival rajahiehrrthan20eycft+rpatienisKAventncular rbralaiic& the resoonretebmsltttIL.L tinimu r ftwoA LS r r (t~r~mininwmofrwoBLSoersonnela[t esc e. Most experisagree that (our res err(atlearttwotrainedInACLCandtwouainrdinBLS}ark the minirnt m required to pr do AC -g ! cardiac amt victims. . (UNDERLINING ADDED) Given the total requirements of firefighting personnel and equipment losiely conduct an TACTICAL FIRE initial interiorswctural fee attack andprovide pre-hospital emergency medical care accord. SUPPRESSION GOALS ing tothe industry's sutnda M.theonly politically driven &cision that is appropriately within a local community's discretion is response tires. For it is through its decision regarding these respons times that the local community defines the acceptable level of risk in providing the delivery of Ciro suppression services. The International City Management Association (ICMA) def nesjust such a set of tactical fire suppression goals as the following: For all structural fires, to deploy one engine company within fire (S) minutes wtd an additional engine company, one ladder company, one paramedic unit, and one chiefofcer within ten (10) minuresfor90percent of all alarms in areas with a required fire f ioK'of 4,500 gallons per minute (GPM) or less. For rill areas over 43000PM, the firs) engine and truck (ladder) must arrive within fire (S) minutes for 90 percent of all alarms. The lapsed time (reflex rime) is to includef+re dispatch and response time. The objective is to control the fire before flashover (sudden spread), or i' before Aefire has extended beyond thrfersi (original) area of invoArmenr. (Using the standard time versus temperature curve as a base, flashover is estimated to be eight (8) minutes after ignition in standard fuels ) The general ioctiral objective is to develop an attack for,e that can aggressively advance twostandardfire stream hand lines lot heequiva- lent). For major emergencies beyond the normal capability f the first alarm assignment, the objective is to deploy a programmed reserve and automatic aid fire force tf six (6) engine companies, three (3) murk (ladder) comparties, rind three (i) chief of cers K!(hin fiftern ( l3) minutes of a third alarm. The objective is to prevent large fires from extending to other structures. For a!! fire and emergencies (i.e., a probability of fire or explosion) in petroleum storage and production areas, to deploy, within ten (10) minutes, special light water or foam firefighring equipment and prepare for long relays and extended pumping operations, The objective is to provide engine companies with adequate petroleum firefighting equip- ment. For fires in water deficient areas, the objective is to deploy, within ten (10) minutes, a pumper-tanker and relay operation of adequate capacity to augment !oral supplies. 30 For fires in harbor areas, to deploy within fi ve (S) minutes for 90percenI of all marine-oriented incidents adequate marine firefighting equipment of 500 GM To maintain and deploy one engine company within fire (5) minutes of notification in 90 percent of alt light rescue emergencies. In addition, a paramedic unit shale be deployed within five (S) minutes 80 percent of ilir time. Theobject! veistoprovide emergency medical senices(EMS)and rescue all yapped persons, including those who needio be extricated with e forcible entry equipment To deploy a truck company in addition to an engine and paramedic unit on heavy rescue incidents. The truck shall arrive within ten (10) minutes 90 percent of the rime. Tlie objective is to rescue all trapped persons regardless of the situation. , The requirement to establish tactical objectives in terms of response times and to provide i sufficient personnel and equipment to successfully and safely initiate structural interior fire attacks is also required byNFPA 1500,5tandardon Fire DeparementOccuparionalSaferyand Health Program. In this regard, the NFPA 1500 Standard, Section 2.1.2 mandates that: Refire department organi:alional statement shall sel forth the opera- tional response criteria far the various types of emergency incidents to which thefire department is required to respond, This written criteria for each type of emergency incident shall contain and identify the follc wing: r O+ (a) The types of standard firefighting functions or evolutions, such as 1 incident management, providing a water supply, hose deployment, forc- a ible entry, search and rescue, ladderplacement, ventilation, salvage, and overhaul reauiredtosgfejycoMfetetheoperation ; specifyingadetermi- nation of functions or evolutions that need to be performed simulia• neously; (b) The minimum number of members required to tgfely perform each w ldentifiedf rejuncrion or evolution, based on written standard operating procedures; ' (c) The number and Apes of apparatus and members required for the initial response to each type of emergency incident, as well as the total complement ofapparatus and members to be dispatchedfor each type of Incident that defines the total response for all incidents up to the level of i a major incident far that Jurisdiction; (d) A description of a typical emergency operation,lncluding alarm time, response time, arrival sequence, initiation of basief inction and evolution assignments, an d standard operal in g procedures, as thesefactors relate a tofreftghtersafety and healeh. (UNDERLINING ADDED) 7I Section 6-4.1 of NFPA 1500 further mandates that fire depamnenis adhere to the industry's stand rd of safe minimum fire fighter staffing by requiring that a fire department not force any fire fighter(s) to perform duties that are unsafe. The fire department shall provide an adequate number of prrsannr! to safety conduct emergency scene operations. Operations shall be limited to those that can be safely performed by the personnel available at the scene. No member or members shall commence or perform any fireftghi ing function or evolurion rhar is nor n ithin the established safety criteria of the organizational statement as specified in 2-1.2 of this standard. 10 These studies and the industry's standard of performance endorse the International Association of Fire Fighters' position that the minimum safe and effix live fire fighter staffing per unit of response must be: .-of least 4 flreftghiers on each engine or pumper company and at least S fire fighters on each ladder truck company to any rope of structural fire, It must be noted that this is the minimum company staffing for safe and effective operations. Safe fire suppression operations involving high density or high risk occupancies grill require additional personnel as- 41 signed to each company. ? This position is consistent with NFPA Standards 1500 and 1410. Furthermore, it is supportedbY the National Fire Protection Association In itsEkt2otectionHandbook andthe ~ International City Management Association's **",ytLlglnQ Fire Services. The fAFF po sition has been en&rrsed and supported by the U.S. Fire Administration and the Metropolitan Fire Chiefs Division of the International Association of Fire Chiefs. Study after study, including the Dallas, Seattle, Ohio State, Phoenix, Providence and Westerville studies, have independently provided additional evidence, upporting the IAFF's position. Appropriate unit staffing and station distribution further lead to a reasonable standard of performance for response to fires and medical emergencies that has been endorsed by fire service professionals and city administrators as follows: First responding unit shall arrive at the scene within 4 minutes of receipt of the alarm in 9096 of the instances, and/or the initial alarm acsignment,consisling of two engine companies and one ladder, shall arrive at the scene within 8 minutes of the alarm in 9096 of the instances. The initial alarm assigned to a fire shall be comprised of sufficient personnel and equipment to control a fire in a structure up to 5,000 square feet in area and effectively remove or rescue any endaangerd occupants, and m2 • Pie initial alannresponse to ame,licalemergencyshalltwsufficienuoprovi& advanced lire support for victirn stab ilivaiion, including cardiac emergency, in a manm:r consistent with the American Hews Association and the American Medical Association nxommendations. i i i i f rj rl s i. 1 ' JJ ENDNOTES 1 MANAGING FIR! SERVICES, INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAOEMENT ASSOCIATION (WASHINGTON, DC: ICMA) 1979, pp. 214.215. MANAGING FIR! SERVICES, 2ND EDITION, INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, (WASHINGTON, DC: ICMA) 1988, P. 120. 3 ALARM PROCESSING TIME " a DEFINED AS THE PERIOD OF TIME THAT IS REOUIRED FOR THE COMMUNICATIONS CENTER TO IDENTIFY IHE FACT THAT AN EMERGENCY IS IN PROGRESS, COLLECT THE INFORMATION PERTINENT TO MAKING THE APPROPRIATE DISPATCH AND ACCESS THE METHODOLOOY USED BY THE AGENCY TO DEPLOY RESOURCES. 4 "TURNOUT TIME" IS DEFINED AS THE PERIOD OF TIME THAT IS REOUIRED FOR THE ON-DUTY EMERGENCY SYSTEM AND HAZARDOUS MATERIAL PERSONNEL TO DISCONTINUE THE ACTIVITIES THEY ARE ENGAGED IN, PROPERLY ATTIRE THEMSELVES, AND BOARD THE VEHICLE IN READINESS FOR RESPONSE. 5 "IAFC ACCREDITATION COMMITTEE SURVEYS FIRE DEPARTMENT, CHARTS RESPONSE TIMES," INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS ON SCtNE, SEPTEMBER 1. 1992, PP. 7-8. 6 THE JOURNAL Of THE AMERICAN MEDICAL AssoCUnoM OCTOBER 20,1992; P. 2184. 7 IBID., P. 2291. 8 MANAGING FIRBlEm EB, INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (WASHINGTON, DC; ICMA)1979, pp. 218.219. 9 STANDARD ON FIRE DEPARTMENT OCCUPATIONAL SAftrY AND HEALTH PROGRAM, NFFA No. 1500, NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, 1992, CHAPTER 2, SECTION 2-1.2. _ 10 IBID., CHAPTER 8, SECTION "A. i r i . I V i c 1 J4 u~) Bibliography AMERICAN INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, "FIRE DEPARTMENT EFFICIENCY," SPECIAL INTEREST BULLETIN No. 131, DECEMBER 1976. AMERICAN INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, "FIRE DEPARTMENT MANNINO." SPECIAL INTEREST BULLETIN No. 319, DECEMBER 1976. 9 1,, y BRUNACINI, ALAN V., "SHFUNKINO RESOURCES VS. STAFFU1o REALITIES ° NFPA JOURNAL, MAY/JUNE 1992, pp. 28 8120. BRUNACINI, ALAN V., "WHAT HAPPENS WHEN MANPOWER IS REDUCED?," INTERNATIONAL FIRE CNji JANUARY 1983, VOL. 491, pp, 17-18. CASEY, JAMES F., "MANPOWER • HOW MUCH DO YOU NEED?, " FIRE ENOINEERW$ OCTOBER 1969, pp, 111.113. -i 13 CENTAUR ASSOCIATES (CONDUCTED FOR FEMA), "REPORT ON THE SURVEY OF FIRE SUPPRESSMN CREW SIZE PRACTICES," JUNE 30, 1982, PP. 18-20. t~ I ;r CUSHMAN, JON, SEATTLE, WA FARE DEPARTMENT'S ABSTRACT: REPORT TO EMECUTIYF c BOARD, MINIMUM MANNING AS HEALTH 8 SAFETY ISSUE," 1981. EDWARDS, C. BRUCE, "CRITICAL FLOW RATE," FIRE ENOWEERINO, SEPTEMBER 1992, pp. 97'99. GERARD, JOHN C. AND JACOBSEN, A. TERRY, "REDUCEO STAFFING: AT WHAT COST?, FIRE SfRYICE TODAY, SEPTEMBER 1981, pp. 16.21. INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, "FIRE SUPPRlSSION RATINO SCHEDULE, " 1980. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS, "IAFC ACCREDITATION COMM.TTI R SURVEYS FIRE DEPARTMENT, CHARTS RESPONSE TIMES," ON SCENE, SEPTEMBER 1, 1992, pp. 7.8. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, "ANALYSIS OF FIR! FIGHTER INJURIES AND MINIMUM STAPF:A PER PIECE OF APPARATUS IN CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF 160,000 OR MORE'" DECEMBER 1991, 1 INTERNATIONAL CITY MAKAOEMENT ASBOCIA ioN, MANAQING FIR! SeRvicEs, (WASHINOTON, ° DC: ICMA) 1979, PP. 80, 214.216, 8 216-219. INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, MANAGING FIRMM RVE_ ICES, 2ND EDITION : a. (WASHINGTON, DC: ICMA) 1988, pp. 119.120. t k 1 14 INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION, MUNICIPAL FIRE ADMINISTRATIO N (CHICAGO, IL: ICMA) 1967. pp. 161-162. JOURNAL Of THE AMEFPCAN MEDICAL A550'IATION, 'ENSURING EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNITY-WIDE EMERGENCY CARDIAC CARE, "OCTOBER 28, 1992; P. 2184. KIMBALL, WARREN Y., FIRE ATTACK-1 Commkha DECISION4 AND COMPANY OPERATIONS (BOSTON, MA: NFPA) 1966, PP. 20-21 6 44. KIMBALL, WARREN Y., MANNING FOR FIRE ATTACK (BOSTON, MA: NFPA) 1969. MCMANIS ASSOCIATES AND JOHN T. O'HAGAN AND ASSOCIATES, "DALLAS FIRE DEPARTMENT STAFFING LEVEL STUDY," JUNE 1484, pp. I-2 A II.1 THROUGH II.7. MEADE, WILLIAM P , "A FIRST PASS At COMPUTING THE COST OF FIRE SAFETY IN A MODERN SOCIETY," MARCH 1991. METRO CHIEFONTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS, "METRO FIRE CHIEFS - MINIMUM STAFFING POSITION," MAY 1992. MORRISON, RICHARD C., "MANNING LEVELS FOR ENGINE AND LADDER COMPANIES IN SMALL FIRE DEPARTMENTS," 1990. N.D.O.S.H. REGULATIONS, STATE of NEVADA, NRS 618.385. NATIONAL BOARD OF FIRE UNOERWRITERS, SPECIAL INTEREST BULLETIN 231, SEPTEMBER 1959. . NATIONAL FIRE ACADEMY, "EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF RESPONSE TIME AND COMPANY STAFFING ON FIRST ALARM CAPABILITY," MARCH 1984. _ i` NATIONAL FIRE ACADEMY, EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM III, "FIRE ENGINES ARE BEcoww EXPENSIVE TAXI CABS: INADEOUATI MANNING," FEBRUARY 1981, pp. 2 6 4. NATIONAL FIRS ACADEMY, "MANNING LEVELS FOR ENGINES AND LADDER COMPANIES IN SMALL FIRE DEPARTMENTS," RICHARD C. MORRISON. I NATIONAL FUZE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, Et[ PROTECTION HANDBOOK, 13TH EDITION (OuINcY, MA: NFPA) 1069, Pp. 10-24 THRu 10.25. NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, FIRS PROTECTION HANOBDOt(, 17TH EDITION (OuINcY, MA: NFPA)1991, PP. 10.39 THRu 1040. i I NATIONAL Fu+E PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, NFPA 197 TRAINING STANDARD ON INITIAL FIRE j ATTACK, 1968. 4 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, NFPA 1410 TRAWINO STANDARD ON INITIAL FIRE ATTACK, 1979. f ' I NATIONAL FIRS PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, NFPA 1410 TAAINWNO STANDARD ON INITIAL FIRE ' 16 i ATTACK, 1988, i NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSocIATION, NFPA 1500 STANDARD ON FIRE DEPARTMENT OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH PAOQAAM, AUGUST 1987. NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AssocIATION, NFPA 1500 STANDARD ON FIRE DEPARTMENT j OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH PROORAM, AUGUST 1992, SECTwNs 2-2.1 S 6.4.1, APPENDIX A, 2.2.1 6 APPENDIX A, 6.4.1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH, HEALTH HAZARD EVALUATION - REPORTS FOR SEDOWICK COUNTY, KS, Nos. HETA 90.395.2117 AND HETA 90-395- 2121, JUNE 1991. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS & TECHNOLOGY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, "HAZARD I FIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT METHOD," JUNE 1991. NEVADA OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW BOARD, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE DlwsloN OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY 6 HEALTH V. CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 44 (STATEMENT OF POSITION AND STIPULATION), DOCKET No. 69-385, OCTOBER 1990. i' O'HAOAN, JOHN T., "STAFFING LEVELS: A MAJOR NEW STUDY PART I." FIRE COMMAND, NOVEMBER 1984, pp. 16.19. a O'HAOAN, JOHN T., "STAFFING LEVELS: CONCLUSIONS PART 6, " Fists COMMAND, MAY 1985, pp. 20, 22.24. O'HAOAN, JOHN T., "STAFFING LEYELs: HaH-RIsE FIRE SIMULATION PART 3," Fog ,I COMMAND, JANUARY 1965, PP. 24.27. O'HAOAN, JOHN T., "STAFFING LEVELS: HIoN•Rlsl Fins SIMULATION PART III" FIRE I COMMAND, FEBRUARY 1985, pp. 36.370 55. O'HAOAN , JOHN T., "STAFFING LEVELS: PRrvATt RESIDENTIAL FIRE PRO110M PART 5,~ FIRE COMMAND, MARCH 1965, pp. 18.21. -.4 0'HAO AN JOHN T.I "STAFFING 0•STORY APARTMENT HOUSE FIRE PART 2," LEVELS. Tw Fm COMMAN DECEMBER 1984, pp. 24.27. OHIO STATE UNIViABITY/COLUMRUt Full DIVISION, "MEASURING FutarwnNo EFFECnvvNIss," SEPTEMBER 15, 1960. PHOENIX, AZ FIRE DEPARTMENT,"FIRI DEPARTMENT EVALUATION SYSTEM (FIREDAP)," ` ` DECEMBER 1991, P.1. SCHAENMAN, PHILIP S. & SWARTZ, JOE, MEASURING FLeI PAIDTIOTnON PRODUCTIVITY 2l L5&& QOYERHMENI (BOSTON, MA: NFPA) 1974, pp, 5 6 30. SCHWARTZ. JONATHAN, LITTER TO CITY OF PROVIDENCE ON COST SAVINGS AND STAFFING LEVELS, MARCH 12,1991. ' 37 t a ti HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 7-6-93 A VISION FOR DENTON - THE 21ST CENTURY PROJECT CABINET Mayor Castleberry called the meeting to order at approximately 7:10 a.m. and introduced the members of the project cabinet. Members Present, Carl Anderson, John Baines, Euline Brock, Derrell Bulls, Chuck Carpenter, Richard Hayes, Lloyd Harrell, Dean Kahney, Bettye Myers, Fred Patterson, Bill Patterson, Fred Pole, Charles Stafford, and Virginia Wheeless. Members Absentt Jack Miller. Guestt Russell Bates. Mr. Harrell discussed the project schedule and stated that the cabinet needed to move ahead. Mr. Harrell Introduced Harry Persaud, Senior Planner, City of Denton, who discussed research being done b Department. Mr. Persaud stated that comparative d tae wasabeing prepared for Denton, Lewisville, Plano, Carrollton, Grapevine, Richland Hills, Frisco, and McKinney. The thirteen study areas inolu3et A. Regional Context B. Local and Regional Demographics C. Housing D. Labor Force, Employment, and IncomA E. Education F. Transportation 0. Recreation, Leisure, and Arts N. Major Industries/Employment Centers 1. Development Cost J. Utility Rates K. Publio Safety L. Tax Base M. Economic Base Study I s Mr. Persaud also stated that the Planning Department would review megatrends or "global issues" and their influence on the direction Denton might take. cabinet members discussed the need for additional study areas. Those are: A. Beautification B. Vacant Lots (when do they come on line for development) C. utilities D. Orchestra/Bands (need broader study of the arts) E. Demographics (especially migration) F. Expanding the Loop of Comparative Data - considers 1. Gainesville 2. Keller 3. Sherman 4. Coppell 5. Cities Along I-35W Corridor 0. Medical (add to the economic base study) H. Business/Shopping 1. Dillards 2. Golden Triangle Mall 1. School Dedication Requirements J. Beautification Costs L. Cost of Doing Business in Denton H. Cities Outside Texas 1. Especially those that began as university cities and developed industry (Norman, Oklahoma was suggested). Mr. Harrell reviewed sponsor commitments with the cabinet. The commitments are as followsi A. City of Denton i. Funding: $50,000 . 2. Spacer Vision Room 3. Support: Mayor, City Manager, other staff and materials as needed. B. Chamber of Commerce 1. Funding: To be determined. 2. Support: All decision makers. C. Denton Independent School District 1. Funding: To be determined. D. United Way 1. Funding: $10jooo E. University of North Texas 1. Support: Research and interns. F. Texas Woman's University 1. Support; Training and secretarial support, Mr. Harrell then reviewed with the cabinet a preliminary budget and status of a grant application with the Meadows Foundation. Mr. Harrell discussed subcommittee assignments with the cabinet. The following needs were outlined: A. Kickoff Event - September or October 1. Date (no conflicts with other events) 2. Place i 36 Agenda (with speakers) 4. Breakout Groups s. Questions For Groups 6. Leaders for Breakout Groups B. Community Outreach 1. Contact Key Groups in Community 2. Solicit Support r~ 3. Sign-up Cards - who will work and participate C. Volunteer Data Base Development 1. Invite citizens to the kickoff event and to serve on a committee, D. Vision Room E. Press Conference ari Media Coverage 1. Determine a way to keep the public informed on a weekly basis. F. Finalize the Budget 1. Develop financial procedures, 2. Authority to spend funds. 3. Source of funds. Subcommittee assignments were made as follows, A. Kickoff Event 1. Chairperson: Bettye Myers. 2. Subcommittees Richard Hayes, Jack Miller, Fred Patterson. B. community Outreach 1. Chairperson: Euline Brock. 2. Subcommittees Jack Miller, Fred Patterson, Fred Pole, Charles Stafford. C. Volunteer Data Base 16 Chairpersons Derrell Bulls. 2. Subcommittees John Baines, Charles Stafford. D. Vision Room 1. Chairpersons Fred Pole. 2. Subcommittees Euline Brock, Russell Bates, E. Press/Media Coverage 1. Chairpersons Bill Patterson. 1 ti t 2. Subcommittee: Richard Hayes. F. Budget 14 Chairperson: Dean Kahney. 2. Subcommittees Derrell Bulls, Chuck Carpenter. Bill Patterson mentioned the need to have a logo or means to identify the visioning project. He stated that since he would be working on publicity, he would bring a sample to the next meeting. It was suggested that a cabinet roster be developed with addresses, office and home phones, and fax numbers if available. Staff will develop and disseminate the cabinet roster. Fred Patterson asked about the visioning process of other cities and if materials were available to review, staff will send him those materials. Mr. Harrell asked about selecting a date, time, and location for future meetings. It was determined that meetings would be held at 7 a. m., every third Tuesday in the Civil Defer.,3e Room at City Hall. It was agreed that Tuesday, July 13, would be next meeting. Mr. Carpenter expressed concern that meetings be held outside City Hall to dissuade any ideas that this was necessarily a "city" project. Mr. Pole suggested that some meetings could be held at UNT or other locations until a vision room is available. It was decided to j continue to hold meetings at City hall for the near term. I Mr. Bulls suggested that a post office box be secured for the "Vision" Project. Also, a dedicated phone line would be nice for inquiries regarding the visioning project. It was also stated that it might be good to have stationary that further identifies the project, staff will investigate these requests. There was discussion on two key policy questions involving non- Denton residents and the involvement of non-project members in cabinet sessions. It was decided that non-Denton residents who conducted business in the City or had some type of required skill could and should be encouraged to participate in the visioning project, Also, meetings should be open and non-project members can attend cabinet sessions, However, "executive session" should be listed on the agenda. It was suggested that although the County could not be a sponsor, that the Mayor and the City Manager would visit with the County Judge to encourage them to participate. They would be considered as ex-officio members. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 805 a.m. P HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 7-6-93 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Frank H. Robbins, Executive Director of Planning and Development SUBJECT: Minter Plat and Willie Hudspeth Citizen Report DATE: July 2, 1993 Minter Plat Update I spoke to Mr. Hudspeth about 12 noon on Friday, July 2, 1993, at City Hall. He advised me that he would pmt be able to close with DISD on Lot 4 before July 6th. DISD is closed Friday afternoons: however, we will be contacting them Tuesday morning to determine their latest position, report that to Mr. Hudspeth, then report to you Tuesday evening. Citizens Regcr+_ Mr. Hudspeth and I spoke about his item on the July 6th citizen report agenda concerning notification on a zoning matter. Mr. Hudspeth told me that his complaint concerned this office's failure to notify him of DISD's request to not consider his plat, our office looked up Mr. Hudspeth's residence phone number in the telephone directory and tried to reach him at that number, after we received DISD's protest letter on the Monday before the Tuesday Council meeting. We did not reach Mr. Hudspeth. Plat applications have a phone number blank, Mr. Hudspeth filled in that blank with his answering service phone number, not his residence number. We did not call that number. I have advised Mr. Hudspeth in person on two occasions before today that we erred in not trying to call him at the number given on his application. I would note for the Council that we began to try to reach Mr. Hudspeth soon after we received DISD's protest letter, Lloyd Harrell made this point to me when I reported the situation to him on Tuesday. We did not know until Wednesday after the Council meeting that we had a better phone number, ran 0 'bbiAICP A000311 01i HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 7-6-93 Denton Fire Fighters Association a I F International Association of Fire Fighters I F Local 1291 P.O. Box 2534 Denton. Tx 76202 July 8, 1993 The Honorable Bob Castleberry, Mayor City of Denton, Texas 216 E. McKinney Street Denton, TX. 76201 Dear Mayor Castleberry, I As the Council begins looking at the major budget issues for FY93/949 the Denton Fire Fighters Association would like to provide you with some additional information on some of our major concerns. First, we have provided copies of fact sheets on pay that should help give a better understanding of civil service employees unique situation. The Benefits Adjustment is also discussed in another fact eheet. In addition, we have enclosed copies of two publications on fire fighter staffing to assist the Counoil in understanding a very complicated but vitally important public safety issue. A fact sheet is also included on staffing. The first publication is a manual by the International Association of Fire Fighters which summarizes much of the existing research on firefighter staffing. It clearly shown just how understaffed Denton is. The second publication is from the International Society of Fire Service Instructors. It's main thrust is the need to assemble a minimum of seven firefighters on the scene before attempting an interior attack at a structure fire. This is especially relevant when considering how long it will actually take to assemble such a orew in Denton after eliminating Central Fire Station without adding on-duty firefighters. It is partioulary important when considering the effect of shutting down Engine Companies to man 5 front-line Ambulances. We provide this information with the hope that in upcoming budgets, r serious consideration will be given to increasing the number of on- duty firefighters. We also provide it for background in understanding our deep concerns about certain deployment tactics being considered with oxisting staffing levels- This has been inaccurately characterized as a union v. management issue. That is an unfortunate, but intentional, misrepresentation by certain members of the city staff. Our concern is our own safety and the safety of the public we serve. Sincerely, Kenneth J. Gold, Secretary-Treasurer International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 1291 Denton Fire Fighters Association P.O. Box 2534 Denton, TX. 78202 (HOMR) 387-7901 [DITTY] 688-8103, 387-7719 X k. PUBLIC SAFETY SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FY 92/93 Public Safety salary adjustment (Fire and Police) 2.0% FY 92/93 All other city employees (AVERAGE) 2.6% FY 92/93 Contract employees adjustment (City Kgr., etc.) 3.0% FY 93/94 Public Safety proposed adjustment* 4.0% FY 93/94 Proposed for all others (AVERAGE) 4.64% FY 93/94 Proposed Contract employee adjustment N/A Figures provided by the Mercor group showed that public safety employees are far outside the market. Fire fighters in particular are substantially below market. The 92/93 adjustment assured that public safety would continue to fall even farther behind. Public Safety is a vital government service. Public Safety employees need and deserve at least the same salary adjustment as the other city employees average. *Included in the proposed adjustment for civil service employees is continued funding for civil service step raises. These steps have a range of from 3.9% to 6.6% in the Fire Department for the annual atop raises in the Firefighter classification. No other ranks have steps. Step raises affect only a very few fire fighters and will not bring the average raise to the same increase as proposed for regular city employees. J TECHNICAL CLARIFICATION ON PENSIONS THE BENEFITS ADJUSTMENT For a number of years, the City has claimed that it pays 14% towards fire fighter pensions. This is incorrect. Their claim is based on that strange creature of the bureaucracy known as the Benefits Adjustment. The actual facts are these: 1. The fire fighter pays 9% of hie total salary, including the Benefits Adjustment. 2. The city pays 9% of a fire fighters total salary, including the Benefits Adjustment. The Benefits Aojuetment is actually a 6% pay kicker, established several years back. It is paid directly to the employee, not to a pension plan. The Benefits Adjustment increases the employee's liability to the pension plan because it increases the employee's pay. It is not a pension pick-up. The employee and the City both pay 9% on the Benefits Adjustment because it is pay. This technical correction is presented because for many years, the city staff has instated to the City Counoil that it pays an additional 5% on Fire Department pensions. That is simply not an accurate representation. Firefighters and the City are equal participants in the Fire Department pension. r DENTON FIRE DEPARTMENT RECENT STAFFING HISTORY The Budget Issues Report for FY 93/94 categorizes new positions into three nreaa: new programs; workload demand increases; or restructuring. Using these categories, it is possible to see why FD staffing continues to be a burning issue, although not addressed in the City Manager's Report. For FY 92/93, the city staff claimed to be adding seven new positions to the Fire Department. The Fire Reserve Fund, established to help pay for new fire fighters for new Station 6, was tapped substantially. In actuality, there was only one new (administrative) position that was created due to a new program. The other six positions were the result of restructuring, using the language of FY 93/94, and had no net coat impact (after initial training expenses) because of reductions in overtime expenses, and eliminating other positions. These six positions were not created for the new Fire Station. The new Fire Station is to be staffed by closing Central Station. The six positions created by restructuring can be summarized as follows: 1. Three were created by abolishing two higher paid Battalion Chief positions. 2. Three were created by maintaining minimum staffing levels at 22 per shift. (NOTE: The minimum number of fire fighters on duty each day remains the same -as it was before the new positions were authorized. The new positions were funded by reducing the overtime necessary to maintain a minimum number on duty, and by restricting leave time.) i Councilmembere who believe that they have authorized new fire fighters for a new fire station are greatly mistaken. The current staffing level remains below all recognized fire service standards for a city this size. In 1991, Fire Chief John Cook requested seventeen new fire fighters, a move supported by the Denton Fire Fighters Association. This need continues to grow stronger. This shortage of fire fighters can not be relieved through I "innovative-" scheduling or "flexible" crew assignments. There are simply too few on duty. No matter how you arrange our deployment, there's only 22 on duty. Some proposals actually reduce the existing fire fighting capabilities by spreading our limited resources even further. Some of these proposed dangerous innovations include: 1. Operating 5 front-line ambulances without any additional on-duty personnel by reducing the number of fire fighters on fire engines or by taking engine companies completely out of service. 2. Eliminating Central Fire Station without increasing the number of on-duty personnel to cover the predictable dolay in assembling a sufficient number of fire fighters at the scene of a working structure fire. For reference, we have provided a breakdown on the current staffing level of 22 firefighters per day. ENGINE 1 3 FIREFIGHTERS (WILL SOON BECOME ENGINE B) MEDIC 1 0 FIREFIGHTERS (RESERVE AMBULANCE) BOOSTER 1 0 FIREFIGHTERS (RESERVE GRASS FIRE RIG) ENGINE 2 3 FIREFIGHTERS MEDIC 2 2 FIREFIGHTERS ENGINE 3 3 FIREFIGHTERS MEDIC 3 3 FIREFIGHTERS (ALSO MANS TRUCK 3) TRUCK 3 0 FIREFIGHTERS (OPERATION ELIMINATES MEDIC 3) ENGINE 4 3 FIREFIGHTERS MEDIC 4 0 FIREFIGHTERS (RESERVE AMBULANCE) ENGINE 5 3 FIREFIGHTERS MEDIC 5 2 FIREFIGHTERS BOOSTER 5 0 FIREFIGHTERS (RESERVE GRASS FIRE RIG) Reserve units are operated only by shutting down other units, or by calling in off-duty personnel. a t now, ' S FS' 30 M,ux SrnFer, ASHLAND, MA 01721-1187 ♦ ON) 881.5800 ♦ (508) 881-6829 FAX A Call For A Fire Service Reality Check on Making the Fireground as Safe as the Training Ground by Larry Davis, Chairman Elect International Society of Fire Service Instructors Adopted by the ISM Board of Directors February 22, 1993 NETWORKING PEOPLE TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LIFE AND THE ENVIRONMENT k l I S FS I 30 MAIN SmLEET, ASSMND, MA 01721.1187 ♦ (508) 881.5900 ♦ (508) 881.6829 FAX March 1, 1993 ISFSI Members and Associates Good Morning: Over the past 18 months, the fire service has faced Its most difficult controversy in its 200 year history. Many individuals and agencies have joined the deliberation and become polarized on an issue on which we as a fire service, and as a nation, should be united: Firefighter Health & Safety. When the controversy began, it was clearly a manning or staffing issue associated with the number of firelighters responding on a piece of fire apparatus. 1SFS] stood silently by leaving that issue in the hands of those responsible for decisions of that nature. Meanwhile, the initial controversy has changed from that of a staffing issue to that of a fireground safety issue. On that issue, It is most appropriate that 1SFS1 take a position. Research of all applicable standards associated with live fire training suggests a minimum of seven firefighters be assembled before an interior structural fire attack can commence. Whether we Individually, or collectively as an association, agree or not Is immaterial because we as a fire service have allowed the standards to become the measure on which litigation is resolved in the judicial system of America. What we are faced with, however, is a double standard. Firefighters are trained in most cases, in accordance with the NFPA 1403 Standard. Firefighters, however, are expected to perform on the fireground in direct conflict to the way they have been trained. Likewise, training for fire officers conforms to a standards mentality and doesn't allow the flexibility of decision making necessary to accommodate the ever- changing fireground operation. This puts unreasonable expectations NETWORKING PEOPLE TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT LIFE AND THE ENVIRONMENT i S March 1, 1943 Page 2 on not only the firefighter, but also on the fire officer, instructor and the general public as well. Certainly if we (individually or collectively) feel the standards are unreasonable, we have the option of changing the standards. However, until such time as the standards are changed, ISFSI must advocate that the fireground become as safe as the training ground and has developed a paper amplifying its position on that matter. To advocate any less than the standards we have individually and collectively participated in developing would not fulfill our legal, moral or ethical obligation to our members, the fire service or the general public. The ISFSI position is a result of reviewing applicable standards. it is not intended to be judgmental of the standards or of local operations. It is intended only as the ISFSI interpretation of existing standards. However, to ascertain what are reasonable expectations for internal fire suppression whether on the training ground or fire ground, the ISFSI Board of Director has appointed a Blue Ribbon Correlation Study Committee. The Rationale for appointing the Committee Is: One of the greatest risks to firefighters Is that of extending themselves beyond the maximum capability of their resources when faced with initial fire attack operations. Regardless of the type or size of the fire department, all initial fire attack operations generally rest with a single team comprising what Is commonly known as an engine company. If the company officer or other Initial decision maker cannot or does not know how to determine the resources required in comparison with the capabilities and limitations of the resources available, not only can valuable time be wasted allowing the fire to grow, but personnel can be placed In positions of great risk. I i c i s i March 1, 1993 Page 3 The Goal of the Committee is: The ultimate goal of this correlation study is to enhance the firefighter safety by providing the fire service instructor with the information and tools necessary to train and educate firefighters and fire officers so they can make initial fire attack decisions based on: 1) the fire attack effort required for the fire, and 2) the potential capabilities and limitations of the resources (apparatus, equipment, personnel and agent) available to them. The committee is organized, and working on the development of a basic control model. Once a model Is developed and accepted, it Is expected that testing and validation of the model In real-life fire situations will take approximately two years and cost in excess of $250,000. The Correlation Study Committee while appointed by the ISFSI Board operates independently of the Board. The Correlation Study Committee consists of fire and emergency service professionals. Individuals representing state, county and local officials responsible for providing fire protection have: been invited to serve on the committee so as to become educated to the needs of the fire suppression forces. The results of testing will be reported ditectiy and accurately from the committee to the world community and provide benchmark data for the development of more relevant standards for fire suppression and fire ground operations. In the interest of ensuring safer firefighter training and fireground operations, I remain Cordially, e~ 1 C_4"V~ Edward H. McCormack, Jr. Chief Executive Officer EHM/ba I r Executive Summary Historically, firefighters have been viewed by many as being "expendable resources" which exist to sacrifice their lives to save the property and lives of others. With this attitude prevalent among society as a whole, the fire service has discovered the value of taking charge of its own destiny. During the past 18 months, however, the fine service has experienced one of the most significant conflicts it has ever experienced. The conflict has arisen over the issue of requiring a minimum of four fire department members to assemble on the fireground before initiating interior structural firefighting operations. The collective fine service must detach itself from the emotional issues involved in the conflict and instead review the facts related to fireground operations. These facts exist in numerous OSHA and NFPA documents. If these documents and the facts which they contain have been adopted by the fine service--and they have been-then any solution to the minimum number of people required for an emergency operation involving an interior structural fire must be based on these facts. Anything less is totally unsupported and in conflict with the very documents which the fine service has embraced. NFPA 1403, Standard on live Fire Training Evolutions in Structures (1986 Edition), mandates that live -fire training exercises are conducted in a manner that ensures maximum safety of all participants while instilling competence on the part of student firefighters. Based upon NFPA standards 1443, 15000 1561, 471, 1404, and OSHA 1910 Subpart I, 1910.134, it is obvious that seven is the minimum number of personnel that can safely operate at an interior structural fire. The unfortunate fact is that once firefighters are trained in such a stricdy controlled environment, they are released into the "real world" of fireground operations to learn first-hand that the fireground is far less organized and safe than the training ground. The questions become, tLzn: With all the unknowns of the fireground, isn't the frreground more dangerot,s than the training environment? And why, if we are expected to train to such rigid standards, are we not required to fight fines according to those same rigid standards? To allow a firefighter to respond to an interior structural fire or other major emergency and to perform with any less degree of safety than that which is mandated in the training environment is absurd. It is therefore the conclusion of ISFSI after a careful review of all relevant standards that the minimum number of fire department members who should be assembled on the fiireground to safely perform an interior structural firefighting operation is seven. Why? Because that is the minimum number of personnel called for by the standards which the fire service community has adopted. if we arm to follow these minimum standards which we have helped establish, we must admit that unless we have at least seven people to perform an interior structural fire attack, we compromise the degree of safety that we have mandated as our norm. 2 Mach 1, Im t it's Time for A Fire Service Reality Check Thus far, the 1990s are proving to be one of the most difficult times which the American Fire Service has ever faced. The major reason for this difficulty revolves around issues created by attempts to change the way the fire service operates. Historically, the fire service has been brainwashed into believing that firefighters were expendable resources. While those responsible for organizing and administering public fire protection were concerned about the safety of firefighters, the historical facts related to firefighter deaths and injuries well document that the unwritten priorities wer+;:1) the safety of property; 2) the safety of the fire victim; and 3) the safety of the firefighters, who existed to sacrifice their lives to save the property and lives of others. Not only has this brainwashing created a false sense of security in the public's mind, but it has also caused many fire officers and firefighters to develop a kamikaze-like mentality with regard to their actions in emergency operations. In the 20+ years since America Burning was published, firefighter safety has emerged to become the number one priority of the fire service. Ibe fire service has discovered the value of taking charge of its own destiny. This is especially significant when one considers that, historically, the fire service was a victim of change rather than a vehicle to bring about change. As in any special interest field where the vast majority of members may agree that changes are necessary, individuals or groups of individuals within the special interest field may not agree on bow the changes are to necessary. be brought about, or in conflict among those who once changes stood united, This results While many may see conflict as bad, it is a necessary pan of change- without conflict, no change can ever be made. Conflicts over issues can range from very minor ones to major ones, which, if left unchecked, can result in war. The only way to prevent a conflict from escalating into a war is to resolve it, based on a negotiated consensus of the parties involved, to bring about a win-win solution. While all parties involved a solution may not get exactly what they want, the consensus provides with which all parties involved can live. Macb 1, 1993 During the past IS months, the fire service has experienced one of, if not the most significant conflicts which it has ever experienced. The conflict has come about because of the issue of requiring that a minimum of four fire department members assemble on the fireground before initiating interior structural firefighting operations. This issue has escalated into an emotionally-charged issue in which many fire service personnel are letting their emotions drive their actions. This issue is not an NFPA 1500 issue, or a career versus volunteer issue, or a management versus labor issue - it's a fire service issue that must be addressed and resolved by all of us in the fire service. The intent of this fire service issue is to resolve the question as to firefighter and fine department capabilities based on firefighter safety. When it comes to capabilities, it is time to admit that each of us as individuals has limits to his/her capabilities, and that we all tend to believe we can do more than we actually can. This is why each of us, at one time or another, has been overextended well beyond his/her capabilities. Defining limitations is nothing we like to do because it forces each of us to admit to what we. see as our own weaknesses. Unfortunately, our macho fire service brainwashing has convinced us that if we admit that we cannot perform to a certain level, we have a weakness-an admission which generally creates feelings of guilt or inadequacy. It is time for the fire service to reason with itself, to detach itself from the emotional issues involved and to use its collective brain to review the facts related to fireground operations. Instead of operating from the heart, it is time to operate from the head. The facts regarding fireground and emergency operations exist in numerous OSHA and NFPA documents. These facts have been developed, welcomed, and endorsed by the fire service. If these documents, and the facts which they contain, have been adopted by the fire service, then any solution to the minimum number of people required for an emergency operation involving an interior structural fire must be based on these facts. Anything less is totally unsupported and in conflict with the very documents which the fire service has embraced. 4 Marsh J. 1993 Before we can explain what we believe the solution is to the minimum fireground staffing issue, we must review the following information. This information represents numerous facts which relate to the issue of minimum personnel on the fireground for initial attack. It has been drawn, verbatim, from NFPA standards and OSHA regulations. NFPA 1443, Standard on Live Fire Training Evolutions in Struc 1992 edition R Structures, • Para. 2-1.2 - Prior to being permitted to participate in live fire training evolutions, the student shall have received training to meet the performance objectives for Firefighter I of the following sections of NFPA 1001, Standard for Fire Fighter Professional Qualifications, 1987 edition: 3-1 General 3-4 Fire Behavior 3-6 Self Contained Breathing Apparatus 3-7 Forcible Entry 3-8 Ventilation 3-10 Rescue 3.11 Safety 3-12 Ladders 3-13 Fire Hose, Nozzles and Appliances 3-14 Fire Streams • Para. 5-1.1 - 5.1.3 - A safety officer shall be appointed for all live fire training evolutions to prevent unsafe acts and eliminate unsafe conditions. • Parr,. 5.1.5 - The safety officer shall not be assigned other duties that interfere with saf ty responsibilities. • Para. 5.2,1 - Sufficient back-up lines shall be provided to ensure adequate protection for personnel on training attack lines. Minh 1, 1993 s h i I • Para. 5-2.2 - The instruc tor- in-c barge of the five fire training evolutions shall determin;, prior to each specific evolution, bow many training attack lines and backup lines will be necessary. Each hose line shall be capable of delivering a minimum of 95 gpm. • Para 5.2.2 (a) - The instructor-in-charge shall assign one instructor to each functional crew, which shall not exceed five students. • Para. 5.2.6 Emergency medical services shall be available on site to handle any injuries. • Para. 5-2.4 - A method of fireground communications shall be established to allow coordination among the incident commander (instructor-in-charge), the interior and exterior sectors, the safety officer and external requests for assistance. • Para. 6.1.2 - The participating student-instructor ratio shall not be greater than 5:1. NFPA 1500, Standard on Fire Department OccuP f ' nal Safety and Health Program, 1992 edition Para. 3.3.2 - All members who engage in structural fine fighting shall at least meet the requirements of Fire Fighter I as specified in NFPA 1001, Standard for Fire Fighter Professional Qualif cadons. • Para. 3.3.3 - All fire apparatus driver/operators shall meet the applicable requirements specified in NFPA 1002, Standard for Fire Apparatus Driver/Operator Professional Qualifications. • Para 3-4.2 - Where the fire department is responsible for structural fire fighting operations, the fire department shall provide structural fire fighting training at least monthly. 6 March 1. IM • Para. 34.2.1 - Members who engage in structural fire fighting shall attend a minimum of 10 monthly structural fire fighting training sessions. Members shall participate in at least 24 hours of structural fire fighting training annually. • Para. 34.2.2 - Any training involving live fire fighting exercises shall be conducted in compliance with NFPA 1403, Standard on Live Fire Training Evolutions In Structures. Para. 34.3.1 - Members who are primarily assigned to nonstructural fire fighting operations shall attend nonstructural fire fighting training sessions consisting of at least 24 hours of training annually. • Para. 3.4.3.2 - Members who occasionally are assigned nonstructural fire fighting shall attend nonstructural fire fighting training sessions consisting of at least 9 hours annually. • Para. 3-5.4 - All members who respond to incidents involving the release or potential release of hazardous substances shall mat at least the requirements for First Responder Operations Level as specified in NFPA 472, Standard fir Professional Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials Incidents. • Para. 5-3.2 - SCBA shall be provided for and shall be used by all members working in area where: (a) The atmosphere is hazardous. (b) The atmosphere is suspected of being hazardous. (c) The atmosphere may rapidly become hazardous. Para. 5.3.3 Members using SCBA shall operate in teams of two or more. Chapter 0 - Emergency Operations • 6-1 - Incident Management Mash 1.1999 7 • Para 6-1.1 - Emergency operations and other situations that pose similar hazards, including but not limited to training exercises, shall be conducted in a manner that recognizes hazards and prevents accidents and injuries. • Para 6-1.2 - An incident management system that meets the requirements of NFPA 1561, Standard on Fire Department Incident Management System, shall be established with written standard operating procedures applying to all members involved in emergency operations. • Para. 6-4.3 - Members operating in hazardous areas shall operate in teams of two or more. Team members shall be in close proximity to each other to provide assistance in case of emergency. • Para. 6-5 - Rapid Intervention for Rescue of Members Para. 6-5.1 - The fire department shall provide personnel for the rescue of members operating at emergency incidents if the need arises. • Para. 6-5.2 - A rapid intervention crew shall consist of at least two members and shall be available for rescue of a member or a team if the need arises. Rapid intervention crews shall be fully equipped with the appropriate protective clothing, protective equipment, SCBA, and any specialized rescue equipment that might be needed given the specifics of the operation underway. NFPA 1561, Standard on Fire Departmentlnctdetrt Management System, 1990 edition Para. 1.3 - Incident Commander. The fire department member in overall command of an emergency incident. s mmb 1. Im . Para. 2-1.1 - The fire department shall adopt an incident management system (IMS) to manage all emergency incidents. The system shall be designed to meet the particular characteristics of the fire department based on size, complexity, and operating environment. Pare. 2.1.4 - The IMS shall be utilized at all incidents. The IMS shall also be applied to drills, exercises, and other situations that involve hazards similar to those encountered at actual emergency incidents and to simulated incidents that are conducted for training and familiarization purposes. • Para. 3.1.2 - Standard operating procedures shall define the responsibility for one member to assume the role of incident commander from the beginaiag of operations at the scene of each incident. . Para. 4-1.1 - The incident commander shall be responsible for the overall coordination and direction of all activities at the incident scene. • Para. 4.1.2 - The incident commander shall be responsible for establishing a command structure that meets the needs of the particular situation, for determining the overall strategy that will be employed, for summoning and assigning adequate resources to deal with the situation, for evaluating progress and changing the strategy as appropriate, for comrraunicating directions and interpreting progress reports from assigned persons in the command structure, and for bringing the incident to termination. • Para. A-24.1 -...every member should be trained to assume command of an incident in the absence of a more qualified individual. This would apply to a situation where the individual member could be the first arriving member at the scene of an incident and responsible for initiating command responsibilities at the scene. March 1, 1993 9 • Para. A-4-3.1.1 - There should be one clearly identifiable incident commander throughout the duration of the incident, from the arrival of the first fire department unit until the incident is terminated • Para. A-4-3.1.2 - The IMS should be applied to every incident from arrival of the first member until termination. The officer in charge of the first arriving company or the first arriving member of the fire department, regardless of rank or function, should be the incident commander until relieved by a more qualified member. • Para. A-3-2.3 - ...The safety officer has the delegated authority to take immediate action to correct imminent hazards. Under this authority, the safety officer could issue orders that cause a change in tactics or strategy. • Para, A-4.1.1 - The incident commander should be located at a fixed command post and should be visible and accessible to authorized individuals. The command post should be established as early as possible, preferably in a location that provides a view of the incident scene. NFPA 491, Recommended Practice for Responding to Hazardous Materials Incidents, 1992 edition • Para 4.1.1 - Emergency incident operations should be conducted in compliance with Chapter 6 of NFPA 1500 or 29 CFR 1910.120 or EPA. • Para. 4-3.1 Hot Zone - The area immediately surrounding a hazardous materials incident, extending far enough to prevent adverse effects from hazardous materials releases to personnel outside the zone. The zone is also referred to as the exclusion zone or restricted zone in other documents. 10 im k • Para. 43.2 Warm Zone - The area where personnel and equipment decontamination and hot zone support takes place. It includes control points for the access corridor and thus assists in reducing the spread of contamination. This is also referred to as the decontamination, contamination iedurJon, or limited access zone in other documents. • Para 43.3 Cold Zone - This area contains the command post and such other support functions as are deemed necessary to control the incident. This is also referred to as the clean zone or support zone in other documents. OSHA 1910 Subpart I, 1910.134 - Resperotory Protecdon • (a) (2) - The employer shall be responsible for the establishment and maintenance of a respiratory protective program • (e) (3) 0) - In areas where the wearer, with failure of the respirator, could be overcome by a toxic or oxygen-deficient atmosphere, at least one additional man shall be present. Planning shall be such that one individual will be unaffected by any likely incident and have the proper rescue equipment to be able to assist the other(s) in case of emergency. • (e) (3) (H) - When $CBA are used in atmospheres immediately dangerous to life or health, standby men must be present with suitable rescue equipment. • (e) (3) (ill) - Persons using air line respirators in atmospheres in atmospheres immediately hazardous to life or health shall be equipped with safety harnesses and safety lines for lifting or removing persons from hazardous atmospheres or other ani equivalent provisions for the rescue of persons from hazardous atmospheres shall be used. Meth 1, 1993 11 A standby man or men with suitable SCBA shall be at the nearest fresh air base for emergency rescue. NFPA 14049 Standardfor a Fire Department Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus Program, 1989 edition Para. 1.3 - Respiratory Hazard. Any exposure to products of combustion, superheated atmospheres, toxic gases, vapors, or dust, potentially explosive or oxygen deficient atmospheres, or any condition that creates a hazard to the respiratory program. • Para. 3.1.6 - Members using SCBA shall operate in teams of two or more who are in communication with each other through visual, audible, physical, safety guide rope, electronic, or other means to coordinate the activities and are in close proximity to each other to provide assistance in case of an emergency. Para. 3.1.7 - When members are involved in operations that require the use of SCBA or other respiratory protective equipment, at least one member shall be assigned to remain outside the area when respiratory protection is required. This member shall be responsible for maintaining a constant awareness of the number and identity of personnel using SCBA, their location and function, and time of entry. Members with SCBA shall be available for rescue. • Para. :0-0 - ...The members required to be avaL.rble for rescue could also be assigned to other functions at the scene of the incident. These members must have SCBA and suitable rescue equipment and be available for reassignment to assist members in trouble. The requirement for additional personnel to be available for rescue could be satisfied by additional companies or members who are responding to the scene and will arrive within the safe operating time of initial entry teams. 12 Moth 1.1447 Make the Fireground as Safe as the Training Ground All interior fires are learning experiences for those personnel who are involved. Even if those participating have fought the same type of fire in the past, and see a particular fire (i.e. room and contents fire) as a "routine" fire, each additional response and the fire suppression actions taken serve to reinforce what the firefighter has learned in previous experiences, and add to his/her knowledge base. Fireground operations during an actual fire emergency are, in fact, learning experiences. Thus, the only difference between a live-fire training evolution in a structure and an actual emergency response to a structural fire is that the live-fire training evolution is scheduled and planned well in advance, while the actual emergency response is not. NFPA 1403 is intended to ensure that live-fire training exercises are thoroughly organized so all precautions are taken to maximize the safety of all participants while performing tasks (which, by their nature, involve more than a normal level of risk) to instill competence on the part of student firefighters. ~I In essence, NFPA 1403 treats training fires as real emergencies, simply because anytime firefighters are placed in hostile environments even those "controlled" environments used for training the potential for a true emergency does exist. Statistics document that when NFPA 1403 is utilized: 1) the potential for emergency is greatly reduced; and 2) if an actual emergency does occur, all participants are prepared for it and, as a result, can quickly stabilize the emergency without injury to any participant. While no standard can thoroughly eliminate the risks associated with live fie training, 1403 does greatly reduce the potential for unknown factors to cause a training environment to rapidly deteriorate. The unfortunate fact is that once firefighters are trained in a very strictly controlled safety environment, they are released into the real world of fireground operations to learn firsthand that the fireground is far less organized and safe than the training ground, The obvious question is, "Why is this so?" The answer is simply, "We accept it as the norm, because that's the way we have always done it." To allow a firefighter to respond to an interior structural fire or other major emergency and to perform with any less degree of safety than that which Is mandated in the training environment is absurd. March i, 1993 13 Conclusion The conclusion to all of this is that the minimum number of fire department members which should be assembled on the fireground to safely perform an interior structural firefighting operation is seven. Why seven? The answer is simply that this is the minimum number of personnel called for by the standards which we have adopted. The rationale is as follows: 1) The concept of designating hot, warm and cold zones should be utilized for all emergency operations and not just those involving hazardous materials incidents. 2) First arriving firefighters should be able to establish the hot zone. If they can do this as first responders to hazardous materials incidents, then they should be able to identify the hot zone for any structural fire. 3) Based on paragraph 5-3.2 of NFPA 1500, no firefighter is to enter an atmosphere that is hazardous, suspected of being hazardous or could become hazardous without SCBA. Utilizing the hot zone concept, no firefighter is to enter the hot zone without SCBA on and in use. 4) Based on paragraphs 5-3.3 and 6-4.3 of NFPA 1500, paragraph 3-1.6 of NFPA 1404, and NFPA 472 which references Chapter 6 of NFPA 1500, members using SCBA are to operate in teams of no less than two. Thus, any attack team must consist of at least two people. 5) Based on paragraph 5-2.1 of NFPA 1403, paragraph 6-5.2 of NFPA 1500, and paragraph 3-1.1 of NFPA 1404, backup personnel and hose lines should be available to protect or to rescue attack crews. Thus, anytime a team enters the hot zone, a fully equipped backup team should be available in the warm zone to protect, backup or rescue the attack team. t4 Mmb 1, IM e 6) Based on N4-'PA 1403, NFPA 1500, NFPA 472, and NFPA 1561, an incident management system shall be utilized at all emergency incidents. This requires that a member or officer establish command, assume the role of incident commander and fulfill the responsibilities as identified in Para. 4-1.1 and 4-1.2. of 1561. The incident commander is responsible for determining an overall operational strategy for mitigating the emergency. The incident commander is generally to locate himself/herself in the cold zone with a view of the incident scene. According to NFPA 1403, the instructor-in-charge of a live-fire training evolution is to function as the incident commander. 7) Based on paragraphs 5-1.1 - 5-1.3 of NFPA 1403, NFPA 1500, and NFPA 1561 a safety officer shall be appointed or designated for each incident. The safety officer's sole responsibility shall be Safety. Based on paragraph A-3-2.3 of NFPA 1561, the safety officer is authorized to issue orders that cause a change in tactics or strategy. 8) Based on paragraph 3-3.3 of NFPA 1500, fire apparatus must be operated by a fire apparatus driver/operator meeting the requirements of NFPA 1002. Considering the items listed above, members of the fire service must educate themselves as to our existing standards and the safe operation minimums required. When compiled, the following breakdown as outlined in existing standards provides for a safe operating minimum, deployed as follows: 2 members making up an attack team to eater the hot zone and attack the fire. • 2 members making up a rapid intervention or back-up team to stand by in the warm zone to assist or rescue the attack team. • 1 member functioning as the incident commander. 1 member functioning as the safety officer. Much E, 1"1 is a • I member functioning as a fire apparatus driver/operator to operate the pumping apparatus supplying agent to the attack team. If we are to follow the established consensus standards which we have all helped to formulate, then we must admit that unless we have a minimum of seven people to perform the functions as identified above, any team entering a hot zone to perform any function is doing so without the degree of safety that we, the fire service, have mandated as our accepted norm. i i ~I 16 March 1, 1"3 i HANDOUT TO COUNCIL 7-6-93 MEMORANDUM I TO: Mayor and City Council FRO14: Frank H. Robbins, Executive Director of Planning and Development SUBJECT: Minter Plat and Willie Hudspeth Citizen Report DATE: July 2, 1993 Minter Plat Update I spoke to Mr. Hudspeth about 12 noon on Friday, July 2, 1993, at City Hall. He advised me that he would not be able to close with DISD on Lot 4 before July 6th. DISD is closed Friday afternoons; however, we will be contacting them Tuesday morning to determine their latest position, report that to Mr. Hudspeth, then report to you Tuesday evening. Citizens Report Mr. Hudspeth and I spoke about his item on the July 6th citizen report agenda concerning notification on a zoning matter. Mr. Hudspeth told me that his complaint concerned :his office's failure to notify him of DISD's request to not consider his plat. Our office looked up Mr. Hudspeth's residence phone number in the telephone directory and tried to reach him at that number, after we received DISD's protest letter on the Monday before the Tuesday Council meeting. We did not reach Mr. Hudspeth. Plat applications have a phone number blank. Mr. Hudspeth filled in that blank with his answering service phone number, not his residence number. We did not call that number. I have advised Hr. Hudspeth in person on two occasions before today that we erred in not trying to call him at the number given on his application. I would note for the Council that we began to try to reach Mr. Hudspeth soon after we received DISD's protest letter. Lloyd Harrell made this point to me when I reported the situation to him on Tuesday. We did not know until Wednesday after the Council meeting that we had a better phone number. rank "Ift. obbins, AICP AXXD03EI w i PkN SOX"Ry OF RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS Major Budget Issues heport 1993-94 July 2, 1993 1- Current Years Pay Plan Results Managed Health Care Program 2• Parks - Utility Lighting Fee 3. Ambulance Subscription Service County Subsidy - Ambulanco 4. Recycling Program 5• Legal services - Civil Service & Zoning Ordinance Legal staff will be addressing this issue under separate cover i i CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM To: Kathy DuBose - Director of Budget and Accounting Operations From: Tom Klinck, Director - Human Resources Date: July 1, 1993 Subject: City Council - 1993/94 Major Budqet Issues - Questions Kathy, this is in response to your request to provide information for City Council members questions on major budget issues related to Human Resources. The first question concerns the results of management implementation of the 1992/93 pay increases (averago 2.6%) authorized by City Council, overall, our managers and supervisors did an excellent job in administering their performance increase dollars in a responsible and fair mannor. They were diligent in evaluating performance of employees in an objective fashion. Employees that demonstrated solid contributions were rewarded as such, and those that, in the managers' judgement, demonstrated higher contributions and performance were rewarded accordingly. In fact, of the $256,446 Performance Rating Increase (PRI) dollars budgeted for non-Ci01 Service employees subject to the pay-for- performance program, managers spent approximately 86% of the budget. We are developing a report that will indicate the actual average increase percent granted. I will provide this as apart of my presentation for City Council on the details of the proposed 1993/94 Compensation and Benefits Program recommended in the budget. The second question you requested that I address is whether we are planning to move more toward a managed health care program in the 1993/94 Budget (January 10 1994 Health Insurance Plan year), Actually, our current fully insured health insurance program, through Philadelphia Life Insurance Company (PALICO), is a managed care program, That is, we have discounted reimbursement arrangements with the network of health care providers (hospitals, doctors, mental health providers, etc.); we have favorable payment incentives (co-payments, deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums, etc.) for employees and dependents to use this network; and, there are disincentives for employees and dependents use of medical providers outside the network. In addition, our plan requires covered members to pre-certify any in-patient hospital stay and mental haalth treatment, 8171566.8200 71FW METRO 044529 r July 1, 1993 Memo to K. DuBose - 1993/94 Major Budget Issues - Ouestions Page 2 While we are currently in negotiations with PALICO for the January 11 1994 renewal contract, it is a,iticipated that we will further refine our managed care program !y implementing a "shared-risk" arrangement with local medical p.oviders. This will, in all likelihood, involve using a groin of 20 -25 primary care physicians that employees and d,pendents would be required to visit prior to receiving care from a specialist. This approach will implement a more aggressive utilization review feature to the current managed care aspects of the health insurance program. Please let me know if you need further information or a point clarified. Tom Klinck CC: Betty McKean - Executive Director - MSED kdmemll.tk 7/1/93 ♦vnn J2 I r i i I CITY of DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 7620f K E R 0 R A N D U N a s= a a: e s e n T01 Kathy DuBose, Director of Accounting/Budget operations FROM= Rich Dlugas, Director of Parks & Recreation DATES July 1, 1993 SUBJECTS UTILITY FEE. :mrasmmmsvmmmnmaassmvsaammavsaamsmaszmus:ammssaaasmmmasmmsaaamm:e it is projected that annual utility costs to Itght the new softball and soccer fields at North Lakes Park will be $17,000. If a $3.50 fee per season is charged to all athletic participants utilizing city facilities, this cost could be recovered. It would be up to each athletic association to determine how they would pay the City for the utility fee. This could be done through fund-raisers, increased fees, or a combination of both. Rich Dlugas, ' Director of Parks and Recreation 8171666.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2629 1 nrs-rv~ }Y uA4~ yjlp J3 I f ADD cirYot DENrom rEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 78201 / TELEPHONE (817) 888.8307 Office of-the City Meneget MEMORANDUM DATEi June 30, 1993 TOr Lloyd V. Harrell, CII.y M..uager FROMi Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager SUBJECTr Questions Council Raised on Budget Issues Last night at the Council meeting, there were two questions that were pertinent in areas where I am involved. The first of those was a question on subscription service for the ambulance. So far, basically through word of mouth and some individual distribution of information at nursing homes, we have 192 individuals or families signed up for the service, In August we plan a mass distribution of Information. We expect abiut an additional six to seven hundred families or individuals will sign up for the service. We have estimated approximately $28,000 worth of revenue in this coming year for the subscription service. The second question was by Council Member Chew, He asked for the difference in per capita cost between small city residents and City of Denton residents for Emergency Medical Service (EMS), Assuming all revenues are subtracted from the EMS budget, I,e, fees, County contributions, and small city contributions, that leaves approximately ;513,000 to be borne by Denton citizens, Using a population of 66,270, that means our per capita charge is $7.74. Small cities after all the reductions, are currently paying $2,75 per capita. I would stress that these two per capita figures are based on populations of 66,270 for the City of Denton and 17,595 cumulatively for the small cities. These figures are from the 1990 census and they were the figures used for the allocations by the County and the small cities last year, If you or the Council have further questions, I will be happy to try and answer , Rick Svehla Deputy City Manager AMM002FC 1 J4 A I ~ I I Q I 101TyOfDENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL SUILDINLI / 215 E. MCKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MEMORANDUM I DATEt July 1, 1993 TOt Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROMt R. E. Nelson, Executive Director SUBJ1 Recycling Program Costs In response to questions from the Council at the "Major Budget Issues,, presentation last Tuesday regarding Recycling Program costs, we will provide an indepth discussion of that at our budget presentation. However, I am including a back-up document that was prepared during our budget presentations to the Public Utilities Board (PUB) in April on this issue, This document lists each of the additional recycling program budget issues and their cost. Also attached is the Solid Waste Pro Forma which lists total expenses of the recycling programs at $397,0000 with product sales providing $249,000, residential customers assisting with $128,000 (710 per month, 6.3E of residential rates) and commercial customers assisting with $20,000 (0.87% of commercial rates), There may be some refinement of the allocation as we continue to redefine which group of customers should assist with particular nspects of the recycling program, Respectfully, R. eson, ExeJ recyclh701.mem. 8171668.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2529 s 10-Jun-93 ~ 09,20 AM SOLID WASTE (3 x 1000) ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE fY FY FY P 4012421100 012421100 -o Rw•n ~ im im Lug 1994 Lm im !m ?per. 1 Raidenbel $ 490 2 Commercial 11761 2,206 2,919 $2,030 2,130 32,107 $2,290 $2,340 ,474 3 Landfol 199 119 2.000 21709 12 ,ey 719 243 2,077 3,115 K Iln 0 0 0 0 290 300 $44 ° ° r 6 To pera n9 Revenue 10,706 14,24, /4,321 ewim%s 0 r Other Revenues $6,242 15,g~ 16,9 Se,201 Ra,denbal 4f 6 Commercial 43 43 36 31 9 Landfill 45 0 0 0 06 37 36 0 Adminlstrebon;Grano 0 0 0 ° ° ° 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 1 Recycling 0 0 37 0 0 ° 2 Beauwieabot (631) 0 0 0 0 0 3 Total Operebng d Other 19 ° ° 0 $3,867 $4.373 $4,416 1.972 16,30146 Ig,e1a 16,970 N3jp Ooerabne w"I" 1 P.yroA $1,734 S1,e60 s ~9PlMS. S I' 39,413 $2,109 12,11{ $2,274 $?,$bs 0 MaIn16n6nCe 401 119 42S Services /S4 goo' say 097 137 8e4 in 460 4th nlurance 606 960 N Gat ease 9 Sundry 61 3S a 1.014 48 1,0ee 1,122 t 179 1 Z3' 1 100 109 17 4e so 10 Other 3 126 t32 130 t40 11 Other 3 3 3 3 144 10 Fxed Asap 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 It Bad Debt 26 ° 0 0 38 ,23 ISO 131 111 140 !2 Contnbubon Motor pool 0 23 ?.1 24 24 94 6a 13 Other 0 0 1 0 24 11 Total 0PBraun0 Expanse ° 0 $3,2.24 $3.5" $3,509 9 4 $4.0214 $4.477 S4,4" 34,634 ?s Not Opustln9 Re enues $541 $g,03o 6 170$ $726 $000 v Sww $1.069 $1,222 Nonooe~ ~Aeenu M Operebng Interest 4S1-Eg4SO 3789 ) ,7 Transfers in (91) ($13) (St3) (S21) (121) 5121) (122) tS Debt Service 193 1(59 (59) (101) (103) (105) ($22) l9 Repay LT Debt 169 176 250 491 (107) (100) )0 other 0 6o so s0 100 921 eel ,9 Other 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 )2 Other 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 13 UndfYl ClowraNebt Rol 0 !46 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 J4 Adm,n,ssruive Transfer 0 146 0 146 116 N6 0 0 )5 Total Nonoperaing (Roth $47 146 0 m 99 16 Expenles $048 $448 10045 $7 $1,0 ,301 17 {het Income Cg s~e 3,981 4,236 4.244 4.965 6.961 5,720 $1 9,,1307 $1 4,330 Z !1-Openan Inteest 0 nu jz In Lm is N~on90d A4eete 104 2 o 0 Fse o . 0661 PnnCOPal 123 156 131 111 149 0 00VOCiaOon 124 124 127 93 So- 12 1 ad? L!~J~ 41 43 Debtl Coverages I I ~ Lu U ~ ~ Igo 3,48 4.01 <.ao 3,69 9.97 1 Iii) t+ 16-Jun -93 RECYCLING 0926 AM X 1000) Y ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE FY FY FY' FY FY Im lul 1031 im 1494 1Q44 !P4! 1 Pounds Clear aimed 0 0 2 Pounds Coiorod Glass p 0 0 0 p 0 0 3 Pounds Plastic 0 0 0 0 p 1 Pounds Newspaper p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S Pounds Aluminum p 0 0 p 0 0 p 0 0 e Pounds Cardboard 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 Qevenueaues 0 0 7 Curbside 1 11 e Noncurbside 1 0 0 p 0 9 Res, Produot 0 0 12 67 67 0 0 0 0 3e e7 e7 07 10 Comm. Pro4uct p 0 37 0e 39 30 11 Res. Yard Waste C a 00 72 73 7S 10 70 !2 Residential O 12a 122 132 70 e0 13 112 152 r Total Reeyclinq revenue 4 11 Q 12 9 301 106 124 440 Oc•nbn_ d E! alum r0 Payroll 0 0 re Payroll e 0 0 0 120 134 130 1 t7 Maintenance 0 b, 0 30 30 40 110 100 ~e~Ce• 33 37 0 32 31 30 :0.osur nce p 6 G 114 131 137 8 111 1610 SuMd H Otherry p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .2 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Filled Assets 0 0 0 0 p 0 II Bad Debt 0 0 0 70 62 0 0 0 0 0 O 52 32 32 15 vacation/Sick 0 0 G G 0 0 Ie Other Q Q O 0 0 0 17 Total Operating Expenses 30 so 30 $304 $391 0108 0121 3440 Nonoouetlna lR•denuesf dsness Ie Interest (630( $0 9 3Q 300 30 Other p 300 300 30 $0 10 Debt S•Mc• 0 0 0 0 n Repay LT Debt 0 0 0 0 p 0 ,2 Adm n Transform GG o 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 13 Admm Transform CS Adml 0 p 0 0 0 0 J4 Other 0 0 0- 0 0 0 iS other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p r 0 0 0 O is Other 0 Q Q 0 0 0 17 Total Nonoperating (Rover 30 $0 30 Q Q Q Q ie Expenses 0 0 30 00 $0 30 J0 IQ Net Income Cesh Ba•ie 0 397 391 tae 121 110 1p Non-Operating Interest p LU ~ I1 Fixed Asmetf 0 0 0 ;0 #0 ;0 ~0 0 ^ebt Principal p 70 32 62 52 32 .i 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 prociairon Q 9 Q p • Income Full Accnlal E la lu 9 i CITY Of DENTON, T/XA= MUNICIPAL BUILDIN17 / 213 F. MCK(NNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76204, M E M u R A N D U M TOt R. E. Nelson, Executive Director of Utilities FROMi Sill Angelo, Director of Community Services DATES April 27, 1993 SUBJECT: RECYCLING SUPPLEMENTAL PACKAGES The 1993-94 proposed budget for the Solid Waste Division includes several supplemental decision packages for additional recycling programs, Each of the packages have been developed on a stand- alone basis and are not dependent on any other packages for resources. Additionally, these packages have been presented as options for expanding the City's current recycling effort so that the Public Utilities Board and the City Council may select those programs in which the public has expressed interest. While each of the programs will stand on their own, there is a great degree of relativity among some of the programs. That is, the effect and efficiencies of some of the programs will be enhanced if related programs are also funded. For example, the Recycling Coordinator package, if funded, will enhance the impact and efficiencies of existing programs as well as future programs by focusing the eV arts of one individual toward project goals. Similarly, the Maintenancb Worker 11 package could enhance the Recycling Coordinator's ability to estab) Leh additional commerciokl white paper programs throughout area businesses by providing an individual to collect that material. The packages (programs) and their respectivo impact on rates as included in the proposed budget are as follows: 1, Recycling Coordinator - ($44,748) A4293C/l 81715668200 DIFW METRO 434.2529 c 2. Maintenance Worker II - ($29,227) 3. Separate Yard Waste Collection/Composting - ($841650) 4. Cardboard Recycling - ($321974) 5 Plastics Recycling - ($381934) S. Cable Swap/Reuse Network - ($5,500) 7. Waste Oil Collection Expansion - ($9,900) 8. Recycling Sites Expansion - ($251280) 9. Citywide Curbside Recycling - ($128l069) In order to provide a little more clarity to the proposed programs, the attached report will attempt to summarize each program, estimate the program effects, project its impact on existing rat6?, assess its relativity to other programs and the City's Preliminary Solid Waste Master Plan, and provide a staff ranking for each program. It Is Important to note that program objectives revolve around the amount of waste diverted from the City Landfill (currently at 4.13) and avoided costs based on landfill life saved at $3.50 per cubic yard. Should you have any questions or comments on these issues, please let us know. Resppeec~t~fully# dX,~C.C 4 11D Bil' Angelo A4293C/2 PACKAGE iI:RECYCLING COORDINATOR Ltj 7481 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The Recycling Coordinator position will focus all of the responsibilities for the administration, coordination and promotion of the City's recycling and waste minimization efforts to a single individual. These functions are currently fragmented and handled on a part-time basis by four Individu- als. The relative success of existing programs and all future programs hinge on this position. Anticipated programs include establishment of Corporato Recycling Council and recycling efforts, weekly newspaper, television, and radio advertise- ments, weekly speaking engagements, formal public education programs, and establishing better markets for recyclable material. PROGRAM EFFECT: Increase in Waste Diverpion Rate 21 Increase in Average Price for Recyclables,,...,,... 101 Decrease in Waste per Residential Customer.,..,.,,, 51 Public Education Programs Implemented.,.., oo... 5 Advertisements Prepared and Placed................. 104 Speaking Engagements 78 Landfill Avoided $38,707 RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER PROGRAMS: Essential for the effectiveness and efficiency of existing future programs, COMPATIBILITY WITH PRELIMINARY MASTER PLANT Totally compatible; will accomplish many of the Plan's recommendations. STAFF RANKING: 1 A4493C/3 I PACKACE F12t MAINTENANCE WORRBR II 29 227 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION, The Maintenance Worker II position will help the City comply with Senate Bill 1340 relative to the in-house recycling p rogram which must be expanded to all facilities and include whi andtealledumiger paper# transfer of print-out (CPO Pli tere crew to cardboard the Commercial Division and their strict concentration on litter current ledgertand CPOe City's 26 DISD program of collecting Wand a white few businesses will be eliminated unless this position is funded. We anticipate that DISD and TWU will request collection from the City on cardboard and aluminum as these governmental agencies strive to meet the provisions of the Senate Bill. The position will also allow expansion of the white ledger and CPO paper collection at other businesses. PROGRAM EFFECT: Increase in Waste Diversion Rate,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,0037020 Increase in White Paper Collected,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 120 tons Increase in CPO Paper Collected,,,140 tons Landfill Avoided Cost :1,820 RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER PROGRAMS: Critical for continuation of existing white ledger and CPO paper program and for program expansion. Necessary for expansion of City's in-house programs. COMPATIBILITY WITH PRELIMINARY MASTER PIAN1 Compatible as the position will allow partial Implementation of the Plan's recommendation relative to up-front removal o' most valuable waste products from the commercial waste stream. STAFF RANRINGs 2 i A4293C/4 s PACKAGE tat CARDBOARD RECYCLING 32 974 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: This package allows the City of Denton to begin a cardboard recycling collection program in the Commercial sector, The program will be small scale initially with additional growth in business during the year. No new positions are required during the year. No new positions are required during this start-up phase; however, funds have been included for in- creased overtime, container acquisitions, transportation cost and program promotlnn. PROGRAM EFFECT: Increase in Waste Diversion Rate,,,,,,,0109% Cardboard Collected Landfill Avoided Coat. 754 tone :5,208 RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER PROGRAMS: There is some tie with the Maintenance Worker II (Package 42) if the City decides to handle card package DISD, board from COMPATIBILITY WITH PRELIMINARY MASTER PLANt This program is compatible with the Master Plan in that it attempts to provide for the up-front collection of one of the most valuable materials in the commercial waste stream. STAFF RANKING: 3 A4293C/5 PACKAGE i4s SEPARATE YARD WASTE/COMPOSTING ($84,650) PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONI This program will provide for the separate collection of grass clippings, leaves, and brush from the residential routos. Once collected, the material will be transported to an area near the landfill where the brush will be chipped in a tub grinder and the grass clippings and leaves will be debagged. Once prepared, the material will be given to the Waste Water Treatment Plant for use as a bulking agent in their composting program. The program will require the purchase of a tub grinder and other expenses related to fuel, maintenance, program promotions, etc. Yard waste will be collected separately by existing personnel on Wednesday only. A new rate structure to support the program is proposed which involves a $4.00 per cubic yard charge for brush in excess of one cubic yard and $.50 per bag for all bags of leaves and grass clippings over six bags per household per week. PROGRAM EFFECTt Increase in Waste Diversion Rates I 4..'. 81 Hulking Agent Generated 2,600 tons Mulch Generated 3,000 tons Landfill Avoided Costs,,,*,,*.., ;37,763 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROGRAMSt This program is essential to the beneficial reuse of sludge through composting. COMPATIBILITY WITH MASTER PLANT Composti:ig is considered one of the major disposal alterna- tives proposed by the Plan. STAFF RANKINGt 4 A4293C/6 t a PACKAGE 45: P1JISTICS RECYCLING {538.934) PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: This package will allow the City to include Type 1 and Type 2 plastics in its recycling efforts. Collection will be provided through the satellite recycling centers and will require bailing prior to transportation to market. It is anticipated that shipment to market will be conducted by rail to an end user in Tulsa, Oklahoma, thereby maximizing the revenues received for the material while minimizing per unit transportation costs. Funds hove been included for the lease purchase of a bailer, a pole barn to house the bailer, containers, transportation cost and other operating and maintenance expenses. Of all the requests received from citizens for xicycling progratrs, plastics recycling has been the most prevalent. PROGRAM EFFECT: Increase in Waste Diversion Rate,,,,00130 Recyclable Plastic Collected,,,,,,,92 tons Landfill Avoided $644 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROGRAMS: Bailer may also be used for cardboard bailing pole barn may be used for cardboard, white paper, CPO, and newsprint storage. COMPATIBILITY WITH PRELIMINARY MASTER PLANt Generally compatible with the Plan as plastic is a major item targeted in the Plan and collection is accomplished through collection centers. The bailer can also be used later in a j processing facility while the pole barn may not hold future value to the total program, STAFF RANKING: 5 A4293C/7 u PACKAGE #6: CABLE SWAP/REUSE NETWORK ($5,500) PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Under this program, citizens and businesses who have items which they no longer need but still have a useful life will be able to advertise the availability of the items for use by other citizens and businesses through the Government Access Channel Bulletin Board. Citizens and businesses wishing to claim an item can contact the City who will put them in touch with the item's owner. Products will be limited to those items that are not proposed for sale. Similar programs have been implemented on a statewide basis for industrial users but has never been implemented on a local level. Staffing for the program will be implemented through volunteers. PROGRAM EFFECT: Increase in Waste Diversion Rate Undetermined Products Advertised Undetermined Products Reused.... I . . 0 0 a . . . . . . . 1 4 . I . . . 4 1 4 . 6 Undetermined Landfill Avoided Cost Undetermined RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROGRAMS: This program could reduce special collection activities and household hazardous waste programs by providing a reuse avenue for paints and other items. COMPATIBILITY WITH PRELIMINARY MASTER PLANT This program should be compatible with the Plan as it would not negatively affect any of the Plan's components and will promote public education on the reuse of materials. STAFF RANKING: 6 A4143C/8 PACKAGE Vs WASTE OIL COLLECTION (;9,900) PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: This package will provide for the establishment of two additional used oil collection sites which will probably be located at the McCormick Street and East McKinney Street fire substations. Funds are included for container acquisition, program advertising, and disposal of contaminated oil at a hazardous wasto disposal facility, The program is aimed at eliminating the improper disposal of waste oil in storm drains and vacant lots. PROGRAM EFFECT: Increase in Waste Diversion Rate.....,,,,,, Not applicable Gallons of Waste Oil Collected 4,050 Landfill Avoided Cost,,,,,,,,,Not applicable RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER PROGRAMS: This package expands the existing waste oil collection program and is a component of the household hazardous waste program, COMPATIBILITY WITH PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN: Totally compatible. STAFF RANKING: 7 A4293C/10 it PACKAGE #81 RECYCLING SITE EXPANSION (!25,2801 PROGRAM DESCRIPTIOM This package will provide for the development of two addition- al recycling sites to be located in Northeast and Southwest Denton, thereby providing coverage in all four quadrants of the City. The new sites will relieve the two existing sites from some usage and will increase citizen participation due to convenience. Funds will cover the cost of additional contain- ers, surface improvements, signage, and advertising. PROGRAM EFFECTS Increase in Waste Diversion Rate,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,004761 Additional Newsprint Collected,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 280 tons Additional Glass Collected,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 37 tons Additional Tin Collected,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 8 tons Additional Aluminum Collected,,,,,,,, 1 ton Landfill Avoided Cost,,,,,$4,494 RELATIONSHIP O OTHER PROGRAM This package expands our existing programs for collection of newsprint, glass, tin and aluminum. COMPATIBILITY WITH PRELIMINARY MASTER PLANT This package was suggested in the Plan as an interim step for the processing facility. STAFF RANKINGi 8 A4293C/il k PACKAGE 093 CITYWIDE CURBSIDE RECYCLING ($128,069) PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS This package will provide for the curbside collection of recyclables from all residential customers in the City. The proposed program has been structured to cover a 75% participa- tion rate on the part of our residential customers. Funding has been included for three driver positions, three recycling trucks, 11,500 sets of stackable bins, fuel, maintenance, advertlaing, and transportation to market costs. The program will provide twice monthly collection service based on a 60% set-out rate. PROGRAM EFFECTi Increase in Waste Diversion Rate 2.2% Landfill Avoided Cost.., $10,385 PROGRAM REVENUESi Product Revenue....... $0 Residential Revenue... $118,057 $1.31 per month increase Commercial Revenue.... $0 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROGRAMSi Eliminates the need for three satellite recycling centers. COMPATIBILITY WITH PRELIMINARY MASTER PLANT This program is not compatible with the Master Plan, in that it dilutes the need for the processing facility and provides no avenue for commercial recycling. STAFF RANKINGi 9 A4293C/12 rx.xne i i J5 1 I e r s t F i i i CITY of DLNTON, TSXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 215 E. McKINNEY / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 MORANDUM TO: John F. McGrane, Executive Director of Finance FROM Kathy DuBose, Director of Accounting and Budget Operations ^ DATE: July 2, 1993 SUBJECT: LEGAL SERVICES Cott concerning legal addressing h for issues service and The City Councilmember Attorney the zoning ordinance. If I may provide any further information, please advise. E , M lb W00617 8171666.8200 D/FW METRO 434.2629 MUNI ION CIAIWATER POLLUTION PREVENT MWPP ` iNVIRONWENTAL-AUDIT REPORT RREPARED BY + MUNIGIPALIY. T • City of u•ocon4 _ t T AbDRESS: 215 La t Ney'r- y Streit d Natoc laws 76701 i, r 7 f r t,r f4DES'pL.p+I~AI1 : A P STEWATI±R TREATMENT PLANT w^ ON~ !3pf; , d ~uIUNICIP L OFFICIAL ' a `r g r ,t "~1 Pr~i ♦ t r , ti". " tole" 01~rAtidoi~P~ia~{+ r" , r .1 7 i 1 w , Flo L ~'l R~ 5g5 :,ar `yTy~{y.F~ r k.~d~~k"" yya i~r i .r• ` j~~ 'yi~~~~P ~C~ `ri 'lP 4 S ~ ~~n~a 11 et 14' • 1 t 1 El . I~i.r . A ~11 " +77 ~1 Y ~*~'i a ~{'i, t'. l+' P y4k rl [ " I ,e .4~q 111 i ~ 1 tt ILI 00 f r ,ry1A '~~Mr 'y`4444f4C YEL SPFbIE p r ! r 7 ~ ^ a I Jw ~ 1 V. 1 , J, ~ Ae, G, ~7 ~ y i l b y t , t ~U DMIZE TITLE 'y DATE x} pp k It U r A. , 1AFgibN"6 '~4C3`r 10§z I F" + a Y ~r r ~ v ~ , -x i ~x 1 y1 ,'y ~ e j 4 l ~l k: t. sar~'r a CONTENTS Pogt PART 1 INFLUENT/LOADINGS 1 PART 2 EFFLUENT QUALITY/PLANT PEkFORMANC.E. , , , 5 PART 3 AGE OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES..... 8 PART 4 OVERFLOWS & BYPASSES . . . , , , , , , , , • , • • , a g o 11 PART 5 ULTIMATE DISPOSITION OF SLUDGE 12 PART 6 NEW DEVELOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 PART 7 OPORATOR CERTIFICATION & TRAINING.......... 16 Certification ~eauirement• PART8 FINANCIAL STATUS •,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•„29 PART 9 SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 " POINT CALCULATION TABLE . . 43 PART 10 EXHIBITS I• FORECAST if. RATE ORDINANCE III. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1994.1998 IV, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART V. CITY OF DENTON RESOLUTION PART 11 INILVENT FLOW/LOADINCS A. List the average monthly volumetric flows and SODS loadings received at your facility during your 12 month MWPP reporting period. (Influent sampling should be at the same frequency as the required effluent sampling.) MWPP Reporting Col. 1 Col. 2 Col, 3 Period Average Monthly Average Monthly Average Monthly Influent Plow Influent SODS Influent BODS Concentrations Loading XLU - Xgnth, - INGO% _ lmalll )pounds tor davl 92 _ Aar 10.800 _ 128 11,666.50 _ 92 _ May 11.210 113 10,420.90 92 Jun 11.770 102 10,149.76 92 Jul ` 10.730 155 14,054.77 92 Aug 10.004 128 lot 641.0(3 92 10.487 _ 153 13,353.50 92 Oct _ 9.798 157 12,813.61 92 Nov 10.190 167 14,148.45 92 Dew, 10.820 166 14,821.76 93 Jan 10.974 160 14,766.43 93 Feb 13.790 144 16,931.53 93 Mar 13.048 163 17,338.60 Oive source of data listed above Monthly wastewater trcatneut operations report prepared by the Municipal Laboratory. i t B. List the average design flow and eODS loadings for your facility in the blanks below. If you are not aware of there design quantities, refer to your O&M manual. Average Plow 5005 Loading (MOD) (Pounds per day) Design Crlteriai -12 Nt~~ 26,521 901 of the Design Criterlaf ~I0.8 HGD -_23.864 C. How many times did the monthly flow (Col. 1) to the WWTP exceed 90% of the design flow? a (Circle the appropriate number) 0-4 ■ 0 polnte) (5 pr more . S points D. How many times did the average monthly flow (Col. 1) to the WWTP exceed the design flow? 2 (Circle the appropriate number) 0 M 0 points) 1-2 ■ 5 points! 3-4 ■ SO points! 5 or more a 15 pole s E. How many times did the average monthly SODS loading (Col. 3) to the WWTP exceed 90% of the design loading? A (Circle the a number) pproprlat• O~- ■ 0 points! 2-4 ■ 5 points) 5 or more ■ 10 points P. How many times did the average monthly 8005 loading (Col. 31 to the WWTP exceed the design loading? _ p (circle the appropriate number) G )a 0 points! 1 ■ 10 pointel 2 • 20 pointel 3 ■ 30 points! 4 ■ 40 points) 5 at more . 50 points 0. List each point value you circled for C through r in the blanks below and place the total in the box. 0 points ■ a D points ■ a I points n n r points • _ A TOTAL POINT VALUE POX PART 1 10 Enter this value on the point calculation table on the last page. . a ~ 2 11 B. List the monthly permit limits for the facility in the blanks below. Circle whether your permit lists ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) or nitrate nitrogen (N03-N). (1) Concentration (Attach additional sheets for other if necessary.) fecal BODS TSS NH -N r Total Other other Other Other Collform (mg/1) (mg/1) N03- Phosphorus D. (Count/ (mg/1) (mg/1) MGL L 100 ml) Permit Limitsl N A 10 15 Report N A 3 901 of the Permit Limits 9 13.5 Report N/A 2.7 (2) Average Monthly Mass Loadinq (Attach additional sheets for Other if necessary.) BODE TSS NH3-N Total Other other other Other Other (lbs/day) (lbs/day) or 1103-H Phosphorus D.O. (lbe/day) (lbe/day) N A Permit Limltsi 12001 150r 1 N/A M /A N/A N/A 90% of the Permit Limit n 900.9 1351 N/A N/A N/A N/A E f 4 • h C. How many months did the effluent SODS concentration (mg/1) or loading (lbs/day) exceed 90% of permit limits? 0 {Circle the appropriate number) 0- 0 points; 2 ■ 10 points; 3 v 20 points; 4 ■ 30 points; 5 or more ■ 40 pointo D. How many months did the effluent SODSy concentration (mg/1) or loading (lbe/day) exceed permit limits? 0 (Circle the appropriate number) 0 0 points 1-2 ■ 5 points; 3 or more ■ 30 points s. How many months did the effluent TSS concentration (mg/1) or loading (lbs/day) exceed 90• of the permit limits? 0 (Circle the appropriate number) 0-1 0 points) 2 ■ 10 points) 3 ■ 20 points; 4 ■ 30 points; 5 or more ■ 40 points F. How many months did the effluent TSS concentration (mq/1) or loading (lbs/day) exceed permit limits? 0 {Circle the appropriate number) 0 points) 1-2 ■ 5 points; 3 or more ■ 30 points 0. How many months did the effluent Ammonia-Nitrogen or Nitrate-Nitrogen concentration (mg/1) or loading (lbe/day) exceed 90% of the permit t limits? N/A (Circle the appropriate number) 0-1 ■ 0 points; 2 ■ 10 points; 3 ■ 20 points; 4 ■ 30 points; 5 or more ■ 40 points H. How many months did the effluent Ammonia-Nitrogen or Nitrate-Nitrogen concentration (mg/1) or loading (lbe/day) exceed permit limits? VA {Cirole the appropriate number) 0 ■ 0 points; 1-2 ■ 5 points) 3 or more ■ 30 points L How many months did the effluent fecal coliform concentration exceed the permit limite? N/A (Circle the appropriate number) 0 ■ 0 points; 1-2 ■ 5 points; 3 or more ■ 30 points Ja How many months did the effluent Phosphorus concentration (mg/1) or loading (lbs/day) exceed 90% of the permit limits? N/A appropriate number) - (Circle the 0-1 ■ 0 points) 2 ■ 10 points; 3 ■ 20 points) 4 ■ 30 points) 5 or more 40 points I 4 PRAT 2s EFFLUENT QUALITY/PLANT PERFORMANCE A. For the permitt&A parameters, list the average monthly effluent concentration and average monthly mass loading produced by your facility during your 12 month MMPP reporting period. Disregard any columns which are not applicable to your permit, Circle whether you are measuring ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) or nitrate nitrogen (N03-N). (1) Concentration KWPP Reporting Period Y4lI month GODS T99 NH -N or Total Fecal PH Other (mg/1) (mg/1) N03-N Phosphorus Coliform (Lowest/ D.O. (mg/1) (m91l) (Count/ Highest) (Mg/0 100 ml) 92 Apr 3.0 1.0 2.39 7.4 1 7.7 7.99 92 May 2.4 0.9 .65 7.2 / 7.6 7.92 92 Jun 3.1 1.2 2.16 7.3 / 7.7 7,61 92 Jul 1.8 0.8 .15 7.1 / 7.5 21. 1 92 Aux 1.4 0.7 .16 6.917.3 719 92 Sep 1.7 1.3 2.49 7.0 17.6 7.15 92 Oct 4.8 0.9 3.29 7.1 1 7.7 7.19 92 Nov 8.6 2.9 3.97 7.1 / 7.6 7.31 92 Dec 6.1 1.8 3.18 7.1 / 7.1 7.68 93 Jon 9.4 4.8 5.06 6.9 17.4 7.77 93 Fab 7.0 7.5 1.59 7.0 /7.5 8.05 93 Mar 5.7 2.5 3.57 7.0 / 7.4 8.44 J e 3 (2) Average Monthly Mass Loading MWPP Reporting Period Qro~ Total Boo ~U lfQ= Ilbs/da T39 ;-N Phosphorus D.O. Y1 Jibe/day) (lbs/day) fibs/day) (PIts'lay) 92 Apr 233.8 77.8 183.07 62{.05 42 l1aY _ 194.6 76.3 52.98 610.47 92 Jun 246.0 97.4 171.93 6!5.77 92 Jul 127.3 58.5 10.84 476.64 92 814 _ 42.1 9.73 427.81 92 SeP 103.6 84.8 146.98 453.39f< 'i 92 Oct 283.2 50.5 188.59 394.31 92 Nov 462.8 153.2 207.42 378.10 92 Dec 352.3 103.8 175.43 444.85 93 Jan 530.9 326.6 341.72 476.99 43 rob 660.4 728.8 140.43 72t. 22 93 Nar 536.2 162.0 333.80 804.61 6 W E• Now many months did the effluent phosphorus concentration (m9/1) or loading ilbs/day) exceed the permit limits? KLL appropriate number) - - (circle the 0. 0 ill 1-2 w S pointel 3 or vote a 30 paints L. to biomonitcring required by your NPDE! Permit} _X~ Yee No a• If yes, hoe the blomonltoring been done or is it currently In progreee? .-Ica__ olve results lncl,uding partial flndingse ,Thw Pwran Crww4 ilw Mr Rwrlart +Inn el + nariwnrw fnr~cl it Lo C. N'hiA -d-i1 &_Lha alleaaej_aL_ 9.42. The plant ran a •cad Mader An nrd►r frn. FPA o wndeect a,Tealrf ~__Xeducline Xialua ion. We are 5 non ha In n hw_jy month TRF. N, Add the point values circled for C through X and place In the bon below,' C points a 0 0 points ■ _ N/A X points • 0 points a _,p N points a VA E points a _ n I points ■ MIA P points a -a. J points • TOTAL POINT VALVE FOR PART 2 f L a~ N• Print or type the name, title, and telephone number of the person responsible for reporting non-compliance to state and federal agenDlese _Au arewen S"ULll<eadeat _all 383-15U2 Name Title Telephone Number Enter the total point value for Part 2 on C.o point calculation table on the loot }.gs. s PART ]t AGE OF THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT tACILITIE3 A. What year was the wastewater treatment plant constructed or last major expansion/improvements completed. 1983 _ Current Year - (Answer to A.) Ale in years 1993 1983 [0 Years Enter Age in Part O., below. 0. check the typs of treatment facility that is smployedi IS.= I Mechanical Treatment Plant 215 (Trickling filta!, activated sludge, etc.) Specify Type Aerated Lagoon 2.0 Stabilisation Pond 1.5 Other (Specify) _ 160 C. Multiply the factor llstad nait to the type of facility your coaasunity employs by the age of your facility to deteraine the total point value , of Part 31 TOTAL POINT VALUI FOR PART 3 2.5 R 10 2S j[aotoe► (age) Enter this value or 50, which aver is less, on the point calculation table on the last page. D. Please attach a scheeatio of the treatment plant. v i 1 1 T Alm Plummer and AxwlRLn. Inc roir.R, SCVbcr Ib BCtwDRIG SCM wki 4LL Q IAND/LL i 1 1 PR YMf IAI;k RASN IO r - Cbm ICriL 1 4UDC2 I.[.0 a %AN1 NORTH PLANT KRAILO Cirf CCTCIRK PR61MY KRAIgR nMA♦. C02MG RAi(R vCAR I / M MRU(N1 StRIINS Wows CCARM2R5 I.SM QAI4nCRS EAMT RAW A[RArA PS 1 RAS S01 OS Il Ofl[R - J 1 I rOR ;`RQIRG RAM S(RAC( /U kAd4C _ - RI RlIM pv A M(R pS, U IC0•(R 1 suko4r e T•N I~ CMl IACf PI.RI M KroS ~ i 1 FLOW Y(RR OAS I WAS III I^*1 J r ~ TMCi CIRRC 1 PSl 0 1 - tEGENQ I TREA MENI STREAM t SOUTH PLAIT PWAAY AOA" rMAI j AW1O NA941 ""CRS RECYCLE M1 PRR,A' ziuov - - . - - - SOLIDS t L to ops 1 cfaows - - - AIR y FIGURE IV- I i CITY Of DENTON, TEXAS PECAN CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXISTING LIQUIDS PROCESS SCHEMATIC r Men Plummer and Associates, (ne KAD oI Rlwt S NORM PLANT DSSDI~FD AplA1t9 ` wS irtNpTlCJ pr{R N0.pNp iMJ(C npN 1 SIUDC( fO UNO I UOOONS ACVII[►OqM (Al11 xl.ro~,C i Dkol------- Vh UnOk Bros L - 00 ' oKRrloel ra I..... HEAD or KANr { (411 fluor.( I''"° pir I I UGOOkS wa~l,•nCr SDUfY RIANI - p f RRIY►RY ~ SLUM ►SSYIPS I St MUM OeNA PIIiYARY CDI.O►R - 10 Uh0 fILNDiNr7 - AN',- MMpMCC ddCCI~DM r Kll GCEf RR GUfTCR "°RMiYwIY"Y . ~ ' ' ' SLOM i ..............r'......... s sip iANr ro ~ .aAo a nANr I a 1,EGEND TREATMENT STREAM RECYCLE SOLIDS FIGURE IV-2 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PECAN CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT " EXISTING SOLIDS PROCESS SCHEMATIC 10 4 u Part 41 OVERFLOWS AND BYPASSES A. (1) List the number of times in the last year there was an overflow, bypass, or unpexmltted discharge of untreated or incompletely treated wastewater due to excessive flows within the collection systems 2 (Circle One) 0 ■ 0 pointer 1 ■ 5 points; 2 10 points; 3 ■ 15 points; 4 ■ 30 points] 5 or more ■ SO points 12) List the number of bypasses, overflows, or unpermitted discharges shown in A (1) that were within the collection system and the number at the treatment plant. Collection System 2 Treatment Plant 0 B. (1) List the number of times in the last year thece was a bypass or overflow of untreated or incompletely treated wastewater due to equipment failure, either at the treatment plant or dde to pumping problems in the collection systems 0 , (Circle One) 0 pointer 1 ■ 5 points; 2 ■ 10 points; 3 ■ IS points, 1 ■ 30 points; 5 or more ■ 50 points, (2) List the number of bypasses or overflows shown in B (1) that were within the collection system and the number at the treatment plant, Collection System 0 Treatment Plant 0 C. Specify whether the bypasses came from the city or village sewer system or from contract or tributary communities/sanitary districts, etc. City D. Add the point values circled for A and 8 and place the total in the box below. TOTAL POINT VALUE FOR PART 10 Enter this value on the point calculation table on the last page. 1. List the person responsible for reporting overflows, bypasses or unpermitted discharges to State and Federal suthoritiess Asa Brown Superintendent (817) 383-7522 $am Title Telephone Number Describe the procedure for gathering, compiling, and reportings We have a radio SCADA System at our IS resote lift stations with monitoring capability. When by- passes occur. I as informed. I then call the appropriate regulatory agency within 14 bra end followup with more detailed information concerning the bypasses i.e.$ duratioa, eetimated flow and lab'data if available in a written format using present form as developed by the Texas Water Commission. ;t PART 5s ULTIMATR DISPOSITION OF SLUDCR A. What is the final disposition of sludge from your treatment plant? Land application. 8. Describe sludge management practices Prise sludges are anaerobically digested and injected into City ownea land aa3acent to rue vas era er treatment plant site. In cases of inclement weatK,. digested sludge is pumped to tying beds. e s u ge a ewe ere by air ryng, mec n c ly removed and stockpiled. As weather emits, all primary sludges are land applied. Waste activated sludge is dissolved air otatton t c eoe and pumped to an aerated holding basin. From the aerated holding basin, the aerobic sludge Ss spose y an Injection or a r ry ag n drying a s. The air oried sludge is mechanically cleaned and stockpiled for later land application, A-ft-e-F-t-Fe p ant coastrLC[ on s comp e e, we-v= eg n mechanlcall devatering and cooditioniag the waste activated sludge. The ultimate disposal o aero e a u ge a in the municipal ao we w Ill continue to land apply the digested anaerobic sludges. We are planning to ultimately move towards bens leis io-so s reuse. a have planned n our capital imporvement plan funds to purchase equipment for composting the aechanical11 11 ly ewatere po yner con tone 11 was a ac va e s u ge. This equipment includes the equipment for wood chipping, windrowing, screen- In and storage area., C. If 1iudge is Qlspoeed of by land application (surface application or shallow injection), complete the followings (1) Does your facility have access to sufficient land fors (Circle the appropriate point total.) 3 or more years lnts 21-35 months m 10 po ntse 12-23 months - 20 6-12 Points r,iontha - 30 points teas then 6 months - 50 points (2) What type of cover is on the site? Crops consumed by animals whose products are consumed by humane. Crops that are directly consumed by htimans. % Neither directly cr indirectly consumed by humans. No plant cover. 12 (3) Describe how access to the land application site is controlleds For the publics _ sas._,_tIICia2 For grating animals na~rrt~~aa 6y (4) Check applicable 40 CFR Part 257 requirements, Processes to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP) Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRP) Does your treatment plant have the capability of meeting these sludge requirements? E Yea 0 Points so 50 Points Describe the sludge treatment processes Anaerobic Digestion for primary sludges, air drying for secondary sludges. (S) If the plant has the capability, are the sludge requirements identified in (4) above currently being met? Yes 0 Points X* RO SO Points D. it the sludge is disposed of by landfilling (trenching or burial operation), complete the followings (l) Identity the means of disposale Honofill Combined with other municipal solid waste Other (Specify) "Anaerobic sludges are land applied and meet PSAP requirements. Approximately sixty (60) percent of the aerobic sludge generated is land applied and does not currently meet PSRP criteria. 13 12) Does your facility have access to sufficient land filling sites fort (Circle the appropriate point total) 3 or more years • int 24-35 months • 30 points 12-23 months = 20 points 6-12 months a 30 points less than 6 months ■ 50 points (3) Is the landfill registered/permitted to receive sludge? E Yes ..........0 Points No ..........50 Points N/A in New Mexico, see E. below. E. Does the sludge disposal site have an approved Ground Water Discharge Plan? (New Mexico only) Yes ..........0 Points No ..........SO Points F. Does this city have an approved sludge management plan? (Oklahoma and t Arkansas only) Yea ..........0 Points No ..........50 Points E N/A TOTAL POINT VALVE FOR PART 5 50 Enter this total on the point calculation tab?e on the last page. ~ d 14 rAnT Al Nr.N OEVr.LOr;1►NT A. rleASe provide the (ollowinq lnfO motion for the total of all sewer line eatensione whtch were inetAlled during the last year. Design Populations 6jI _ neeign rlows IUVi_HCD benign RObSt_ 165 my~l n, flee An industry Jar other development) moved into the comeunity or expAnded production in the pAmt year, such that either flow or pollutant tosdings to the sewerage system were significantly Increased (St or greAtsr)? (Circle One) Nq - 0 points; Yes . 15 points Dascrlbee Llxt Any new pollutAntei C• In there any development (ind,iatrial, commercial, or residential) I enticlpAted in the next 7-3 yeAre, such that either flow or pollutant toAdings to the sewerage eyntPm could significantly inereaw (circle one) Wm 0 polntel Yes , 15 points Dnscribeo_rg&grblkL ls expnnJlu nild the Outlet MA11 had opened, but we Ju nut helleve these wit) aly,nlrlrnntly Iurrenxe flnw, - I List any new pollutants that you anticipate; None D. ArM together the point value circled in B and C and place the sufa in the blAnk below. TOTAL MINT VALUR rop PAnT 6 ~l Enter thin vA1ue on the point cAlcilAtlon tAble on the lost page. 15 PART 7t OPERATOR CERTIFICATION AND TRAINING Provide information foe your Wastewater Treatment Plant and Collection System (not Public Water Supply), A. Responsible person-in-charge of operation per shift. SHIFT, Day NAHEt Eduard Berryeau TELEPHONE Is (817) 383-7520 CERTIFICATION /s 523-46-0020 GEVELt K LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRED, 8 ' SHIFT, Swing NAHEt Mlke Lewis TELEPHONE to (817) 383-7520 CERTIFICATION jt 456-01-1703 LEVEL, H LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRED, B SHIFT, Night NAHEt Skelly Esquire Jae _ TELEPHONE Is (817) 383-7520 CERTIFICATION 11 460-55-7721 LEVELt 8 LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION RLQUIP M H SHIFT, Relief NANEI Thomas Eubanks TELEPHONE Is (817) 383-7520 CERTIFICATION to 4170-p8=11I`7 LIVELI H LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIREDs"B 16 PART 71 OPERATOR CERTIFICATION 01) TRAINING Provide-infor+etion for your Maetewater Treatment Plant find Collection System p"It Public Mater supply). A. Responsible person-in-charge of operation per shift. SHIM Dam NAHEI Thomas ahera TELEPHONE II - CERTIFICATION it 450-35-4865 LE'VELe B LEVEL or CERTIFICATION REQUIREDI5_ EHI►TI NANEe TELEPHONE /t CLRTIFICATION /t LEVELe LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIREDt 3HIFTt f t NAM TELEPHONE It CERTIFICATION It LEVEW LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIREDI SHIPTI NANEe TELEPHONE II CERTIFICATION It LEVELI LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION REQUIREDI I i I iri { on"" and Laboratory Staff. Include collection system personnel. Attach • 9. OperQcnsie=cosssry. a YEARS STATE APPROVED on CERTIFICATIONAS MAL TRAINING r• iii TITLEt X z LEM MME$ OM UNITSI Ern Howard Martin Director Env. Serv. 16 A 450-96-8699 Perpetual Asa H. Brow Superintendent 8 A 563-64-2614 01/22/99 0 Larry B. Taylor Bier. Foreman 19 B 450-98-4174 12108/97 60 Bobby J. Kiser Mafot. Foreman 22 B 466-94-9443 06/11/96 40 Thomas Eubanks _ WW Operator It 13 B 430-88-0142 11/30/93 60 Edward Be~r~.c~at WW Operator 11 9 B 523-46-0020 07/24/95 20 Thomas N. Nabors WW Operator 11 8 8 450-35-4865 05/21/96 20 Skelly K. Jae Esq. WW Operator 11 7 B 460-55-7727 08/18/93 80 William D. Hirschi WW Process Tech 8 B 454-53-3594 04/26/96 20 Roger D. Beaird WW Operator I 14 C 459-74-6319 11/15/93 60 i William Case WW Operator 1 5 B 458-15-8070 02 2l 97 20 * If Applicable Since last certification/renewal. (List units) Certification Continue on Nett Page State requirements for recertification/renewal I 15 i B. rations Naintenane and Laboratory Stall. Include collection syetea personnel. Attach ad onal 1M necaseary. YZARS STAT= APPROM , ON CaRTIPICATION/18MMAL TRAINING MAHZt TITM 'gift[ UM !U U= o11IT33 i Nark T. Hilliard Heavy Equip. Oper 6 C 454-21-5457 05/20/94 20 Nike N. Whatley Heavy Equip. Oper 6 C 467-43-6990 160 Velma E. Cray Secretary 7.3 • It Applicable Since last eertifieation/renewal. (List units) State requirements for rec*rtifteat lon/cenewali 19 i i i i B. Operations aint*n4nce and Laboratory Staff. Include collection s stem a it ona sbeete eoe@Mary, Y personnel. Attach YEARS ON CERTIFICATION/RznvAL STATE APPROVED NAME: TjTLRi STAFr jj= NMZ8 TRAINING DdT~i tRfITS~ bra T. Mike Levis Operator II 12 B 456`02-1703 07124195 20 Mike McCool Operator I 7.5 C 458-29-6721 07/30/93 20 Gary R. Stover Operator I 7 B _ 461-94-0869 05/21/96 0 Pete may )hint. Neeb II 9 B 019-36-3569 07/24/95 80 Tinotby A. H&U Malat. )lecb II 3.8 B 465-29-5645 20 Jerry D. Scott paint. Kech II 2.5 C 4 _ 63-60-7930 220 R-ay T_ Harris Mainf M rh 7 2~ C 120 Chricfnnhar shelrnn }lain`. llprh I -1 C_ .451-37-9138 liikw rnr1rrP11 _.Naint. N rh I I C 465-96-8069 20 Rnn_V_ Nnh1e Electronic Tech 5.5 C 462-76-4968 160 Lloyd Raney llaiot. Worker I 12 40 ' If Applicable Since last certification/renewal. (List units) State requireaments for recertification/renewals--A . Rn hra• r 6o hra• D can not be reaeved. 0 C. staffing identified In 09H Manual. 7iF6LT.M;,L 8~H86R OI E £"fIrIyal U (If.approprlate) Director A Superintendent 1 A Poreman 2 B Qgerators it g B -Qoeratora I TOTALr 12 COHHENTBr CONTINUE ON NEST PACE 0. Pointe determination for operator certification and training, (Circle the appropriate point totals below.) (1) Certification level for responsible person(a) in charger All meet or exceed required level. • 0 Pont Any below required level. • 70 Pointe (2) Training for last cettlflcation periods All staff has required training. • 0 Points some staff has lose than required trainingr but all staff with at leapt i year of service has some training. ■ SS !o!n!s One or mors eta(( with at least 1 year of service has no training, ■ 30 Points 21 11. Operations, Kaintenance, and ratory eta Include collection syet" personnel. Attach additional sheets If necessary. LMRATORY STAFF YEARS STATE APPROVED ON cnTIvicATIOM/RanwAL TNUMI1/0 Me dMIL UUJLL STA" LPL ED= Ua UKIM hrs Environmental Jim Coulter Services Adainistrator E nja o/a n/a p/e Pretreatment Bill KcCullouab. Program Coordinator 8 BB 019-40-3370 06-02-96 20 Chemist/ Vanetca Verboah Laboratory Su ep rvisor 7 B 357-52-8228 04-02-95 40 Debbie Whltvorth Lab Tech 7 C 545-13-8642 05-18-94 20 Kim Whorton Lab Tech 0 n/a n/a n/n 20 Ralph Patrick Lab Assistant 1 n/a a/a n/a 20 William Bansbury Adman Intern I 1 a/a n/a n/a o/a Steve Ryburn Aemto Intern I 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a Pollution Control d John Glover Abatement officer 4 n/a n/a n/a n/a Pretreatment Program Kike Spradling Inspecter 0.6 n/a o/a n/a n/a Cayla Wright Secretary 0.6 n/a n/a n/a n/a • It Applicable 1 e• Since last certification/renwel. (List units) Stab requirements for rwertifLast Lon/renewal s 22 fi C. Staffing Identified in O&M Manual. TYPEITITLRi NUMBER or EACH CERTIFICATION LEVEL (If,eppropriate) Qperators I I C Maint Mech. II 3 B Haint Mech. I 3 C Process Tech ! B Heavy Eauip. Operator 2 C TOTALe 10 We have a 5±cretary and Haint. Worker I (t full-tine and 2 temp. seasonal). Also ve share 2 electricians, l:electcon, tech. and I electric apprentice with the Water Production Plant. _ I D, Points determination for operator certification and training. (Circle the appropriate point totals below.) (1) Cortificatioo level for responsible person(s) in charges All meet or exceed required level. ■ 0 Points Any below required level. ■ 30 Points (2) Training for last certification periode All staff has required training. ■ 0 Points some staff has less than required training, but all staff with at least I year of service has moss training. ■ 15 Points one or more staff with at least 1 year of service has no training. ■ 30 Points 2.3 I III i a u x 7 1 i , C. Op-,ations, Maintenance, and Laboratory Statf. Include llectiun system personnel. Attach additional sheets if necessary. State Approved Yre On Level Certification/Renewal Training HM Title Staff Number P-4" IIdit Urn ANDERSON, CHRIS LANDFILL FNGINEER _.02 N/A 585-30-42q2 _ N/A •Q_- PONDER. SEAN ENGIN. TECH BROWN. DANIET, ENGIN. TECH II --4.-0-3 C~ 246-62-3555 .p. COSGROVE, JERRY ENGINEER ADMIN. 2.03 N/A 041-46_3255 N/A .p. Gam. GLENN ENGINEER ASSOCIATE 4.14 N/A ~¢~55_g256 N/A _0. HILL. ROD ENG. TECH I 3.08 CII 454 15 5498 6/92 .0- KEEIQN. MIRE ENG. TECH II/GIS 4.01 m'E_RS. GARY 490-40-2249 •0- ENG. TECH II 13.0 N/A 459.15-3002 N/A ' If applicable Since last certification/renewal (list units) State requirements for recertification/renewal: +.,~0 hrs: B_• 60 hrs; C 30 brs: D can not be renewed. r { h C. Opp tions, Maintenance, and Laboratory Sta. Include collection system personnel. Atta(.li additional sheets if necessary. State Approved Yrs On Certification/Renewal Training Name Title Staff_ Level der pe _ Unit Hre BMJQW• MIKE CREW LEADER (HEO9.06 CII 454-33.4010 3/92 .0m BARZANO. ROBERT UTILITY TECH I 12.08 CII 462.59-6721 1/93 -0- BEHRENS. KIRT CREW LEADER (HEO) 8.03 C 337-56-4628 3/92 40 BROWN. JERRY UTILITY ^ECH I _3.06 N/A 492-52.3340 N/A -0- BROWN, WILLIS V. SUPERINTENDENT 10,04 N/A 266-34-2248 N/A -0- COX. JAMES UTILITY TECH I 3.00 NIA 467.75-4834 NIA .0- GODI"BE UTILITY TECH I 19.10 N/A 462-76-6691 N/A .0- _ HARP. MICHAEL UTILITY TECH I _ 4 ,ILQ N/A y~,2_06.982Q N/A _ -0- HEATH, JOHN UTILITY TECH I 3.08 CII 451.78-1161 7/95 -0- _ HUDSQZ], JOHN FOREMAN/F. H. ~8,QQ B 446-46-1475 1/93 .0,_____ JACKSON. MICHEAL _ CREW LEADER (HEO) 9.00 CII 467-23-7294 9/92 LOOPER. THOMAS UTILITY TECH I _ 4.09 -M/A_ 462-23.2209 N/A _ -0- PRYOR, KELVIN u FOREMAN. WTR DIST 10.08 CII 464_45-5505 8/91 -0- RICHARDSON. JEFFERY UTILITY TECH 1_ _ 2.02 CII 9,64 35-:j§-U _1/93 _0"_-_ I2ITCHSON. LOYD _ SR M. AIDE 7.04 N/A 158.13-8670 N/A -0-,r _ SMITH. BUTCH _ SR ENG. AIDE 7.03 N/A 451-78-0342 N/A -0- WHIT 1im--j_$'LL MAINT. WORKER I 2.09 N/A 431-48.4976 N/A _ - WILS N. COLIN MAINT. WORKER I 03 N/A 462-49.1943 N/A _ .0 * If applicable Since last certification/renewal (list units) State requirements for recertification/renewal: A = 80 hrs: B e 60 hrs C 30 hrs D c n not b~ renewed. 25 ,F 3 q C. 01. ations, Mriintenance, and Laboratory Sta_.. Include ollection system personnel. Attach additional sheets if necessary. State Approved Yre On Certification/Renewal Training Name jille Staff Level Number pate Unit Hre _ BF&KHAM. QUY UTILITY TECH 1 12.11 N/A 556-80-0584. N/A CAMARGO. MOISES UTILITY TECH I 4,_Q8 N/A 464-97-1706 N/A .0- HAWES, L W FOREMAN 15.09 2441.32.7968 N/A -0- _ HICKS. ALLEN UTILITY TECH I 2,14 N/A 457.02-0703 N/A HYMES, DUANE MAINT WORKER I 2.08 D_ 355.74-9975 N/A .0 M-MTON. MICHAEL_ MAINT- WORKER I .06 N/A 464-65-0936 N/A .0- MITTERNIGHT. BILL MAINT WORKER I _ 03 N/A 433-96-0334 N/A .0- MOCrE. BRAD CREW LEADER (HE0) 4.07 CII 444.62-9294 10/92 _2• ONATE. GUST VO UTILITY TECH I _ 6.04 NIA 871-48-1287 N/A _ .0- REYNOLDS, KERRY MAINT. WORKER I .03 N/A 458-19-9135 - N/A -0---- STACK, MICHAEL MAINT, WORKER I 1.07 N/A 462-02.3269 N/A -0- TORRES. LUZ SR CREW LEADER (H80) 3.0Q CII 464-68.3963 14/92 20 WILLIAMS, DAVID - UTILITY TECH I _S5.U _N/A 452-06-2 _ N/A * If applicable Since last certification/renewal (list units) State requirements for recertification/renewal: AA 60 hre: 8 - 60 hrg-;_4=30 h 2~11_i14~ renewed _ _ - 26 I TEXAS WATER COMMISSION Certification of Wastewater Operators P. 0. Box 13007 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-3087 Telephone: 512/165-7732 TYPES OF CERTIFICATES The Texas Water Cc neisslon issues the folloring types of wastewater operators' certlfi- catest Class A Wastewater (valid for 8 years) Class B Wastewater (valid for 5 years) Class C Wastewater (valid for 3 years) Class 0 Wastewater (valid for 2 years) TRAINING Credit Is given for attendance at approved wastewater training courses, Annual and Regional Short Schools and all-day association meetings on the basis of one credit per class hour of verified attendance; two credits are given for each monthly district association tweeting attended. EXAMINATIONS The examinations cover fundamental knowledge of the requirements for a Wastewater system, Interpretation of analytical data, selection of pumps, collection systems, maintenance and ssnagement. The passing score for each examination rs 70t. Failed examinations way be repeated 90 deys after the examination date. CERTIFICATES Application should be made on a standard application form. As much Information as possible efttary datedld and g ubmittednwithp an shoots If sheet to he Texas Water application 1 sj~ ~P.Osi, gnedBox 130670 Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 18711-3067. MINIMUM QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Certiflcets Education TralnT Exoerienceee Creditaita Class A College Degree (Masterts)s with 4 years (0) and 160 hours or College Degree (Bachelor's)* with 5 years (0) and 160 leours or High School Graduate or equivalent with 6 years (2) and 160 hours Class 8 College Degree (Bachelorts)s with I year (0) and 100 hours or High School Graduate or equivalent with 5 years (2) and 100 hours Class C High School Graduate or equivalent with 2 years (1) and 60 hours Class 0 High School Graduate or equivalent with no but or less than High School Graduate with 40 hours no but 40 hours (Not renewable unless operator Is employed at a system of 250 connections or less.) 27 a Only college degree with a major in any engineering discipline ellglble for regl- stratlon as a professional engineer or In chemistryp biology or bacteriology. es Experience Substitutions. One year of college (32 semester hours) of an additional +.40 hours of training credit may be substituted for one year of experlence. I ) Indicates maxlmum number of years of experience permitted for substitution. nee TralnlnCredi~t Ois final find ®rtses. The following 20-hour courses or their equivalent are required for the Class levels Indicated beiowt Class A Wastewaters Wastewater Treatment, Wastewater Collection, Wastewater Labor- atory and Management Class 8 Wastewater: Wastewater Treatment, Wastewater Collection and Wastewater Laboratory Class C Wastewater: Basic Wastewater Operations and either Wastewater Treatment or Wastewater Collection Class D Wastewaters Basic Wastewater Operations EXPERIDIM ' Experience must be in actual wastewater system operation or Its approved equivalent. Experience as foreman or supervisor In most capacities of wastewater systems my be considered acceptable. Experience In a purely clerical capacity such as accounting or bookkeeping cannot be oonsidered acceptable experience. RENEWAL OF CERTIFICATES Applications for renewal of expiring certificates will be provided by the Texas Waters i Commiselon. The application must be completed and returned prior to the certificate's date of expiration unless that certificate has been previously revolted for causep or has been replaced by a higher class of certificate. CertIfleates iisy~be renewed either by re-examinet ion or by accuouIatIon of traInIAg credits (hours). The training credits must be earned from the date of Issuance of the current certificate and In the following amounts3 Class A Wastewater - 80 hours Class 0 Wastewater - 50 hours Class C Wastewater - 30 hours Class 0 Wastewater - 20 hours Credits applied toward renewal may later be applied toward obtaining higher classes of certificates. 28 k . w 4 FART 8s FINANCIAL SYATUS All Financial Stator Information should riscal Year ss,d be based on your ~letsd List Fiscal Year 1992 Begins October 1 1991 sndss September 0 1992 A. List your annual Oi01 costs, replacement costs (O"Lpment such an motors, pumps, bearin r useful lireplacement, treatment taclllt g ' et0•. for the useful fe of the Mnuel ea y), debt service costs, training -Cajft -~lIILU 8udceted , °oets, and revenue. oiJtr I3a1e,3terRevenue S3.4S1_ 4i~ __jjL$b 503 Totals _ S6.444 2 0 Replacements ♦ S tnn + S °+-i"u~~ Debt Trainings + 918,762 ~5- 71_ 8ervlcer ~S Bub Totals ■ St SRA 11? ■ si AC_~_ Balancer SS•~i0.G7R Debt Services ~ 918,762 + L,208,000 Debt Service Aeserveas + 51,440,338 + 51,148,452 Other Aeservess + S 839,434 + s 840,000 Totals 6.466 846 57,0_ 4_1 425 B. Are revenues and expenditures to or kept in ae°ountr s for the wastewater utllitY/system posted eparate from non-sewer accounts (i.e., water utilities, public works, etc.)p (Circle one) A No Explains Revenues and expenditures have been maintained in se orate accounts, u the official financial statements reflect a combined Water Wastewater Utility. The have been se arated into se arate utilities be lnnin with fiscal Notess 1 g ar 93. . Budet/Actual revenues nd expenses are based on the entire Wastewater Utility. 2. Debt Service includes principal and interest. 3. 064 costs do not reflect non-operating expenses such as return on investment and administrative transfers paid to general +vernment. 29 . a (3) Staffing for wastewater treatment systems Equals or exceeds level listed in OLX Manual. W CO: Points No O&M Manual. 60 Points Lese than level listed in O&X Manual. . 60 Points (4) Dedicated budget line item for operator tratnings Sufficient funds included in budget to provide each employee with minimum hours of training required for recertification or 0 Points upgrade. Insufficient funds included in budget to provide each employee with minimum hours of ■ 10 Pointe training required for recertification or upgrade. M 30 Points No dedicated training funds Identified in the budget. TOTAL POINT VALUE FOR PART 7 Enter this total on the point calculation table on the last page. t, 0 (1j Are eewsr expenditures evc' paid for with non-s•wsr revenues? (Circle one) Yes It ys•, oxplaine ine War r Wastewater Utilit and shared en ineerin and administrative su ort there may be isolated cases of cross su ort between water and wastewater. Are saver revenuer ever used for non-sews • xPenditurem? {Circle one) Yea tm If Yes, explains SEE (I ABOVE) C. Rea all users or user classes charged based on the wastewater treatment works? Attach a copy of the rate schedule(s). (Circle one) No If not, why? (1) Mhat was the total billing amount for sewer ursr rates include connection lees and other special lees ( not fiscal year? ) for the la st 6 370 071 (2) What amount of this billing total was outstanding (i.e., not collected) at the and of tha last fiscal year? - s 348 397 (3) What to the cumulative total Of outstanding fees for the last live years or other time Period is of the and of the last !local year? Specify time pariodi Cumulative total, s Fees are billed at time of service and normally collected during next billing cycle, 31 3 D. Are the equipment replacement funds in a segregated account? (Circle One) Yes{ (Lquipmeat replacement, such as motors, pumps, bearings, etc., for the useful life of the treatment facility.) Equipment Replacement fund Beginning Dater Balancer 9 Ndditionsr + S ` Disbursementer -5 Ending Balancer Dater Explain disbursementsr Equipment is replaced using a combination of h and bond funds - planned on an annual basis. E. What financial resources do you haw available to pay for your wastewater improvement/reconstruction needs? (excluding maintenance replacement mentioned in D above) Improvements/reconstruction are -financed through the use of revenue bonds. The five year Capital Improvemer'" Plan is e,aad to plan for the use of existing bond funds and the need for Additional hondsales. Is there a capital improvements fund in place? (Circle one) 9" No Five year plan revised annually. (See Eabibit III, 1994-1998 Capital Improvement Plan) 314 i (SEE ATTACHED UTILITY FORECAST) (FOR PART 9A-E) rAAT 9, SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION A. Vascribe Lriefly the physical and structural conditions of the treats»nt facilitiset (See Exhibit I, 1993 Municipal Utilities Forecast) B. Describe the condition of the collection/conveyance system including lift stations (l.e.age of sewer, inflltratlon/inflow etc.)--The collection ayatom de I,av soya; problems with I/T. The g1ty of Denton has 1150,000 to the CiP for 1/1 Investigation each year. Also, $100,000 to devoted to manhole rehabilitation each year C. What sewarage system lr.,provnments does the coaexanity have under consideration for neat 10 yeerst (See Exhibit III, 1994-1998 Capital Improvement Plan) D. (1) List the theoretlcal design life of the plant. ' (Z) List whet you believe is the remaining useful life of the wastewater treatment facilities in light of development and maintenance/condition of the facilitiest (31 Explain basis for astimate of remaining useful lifet (See Exhibit 1, 1993 Municipal Utilities forecast) E. What probleme, It any, have been experienced over the last year that have threatened collection or treatment of wastewaterf 1/1 continue to be a problrm. We have completed and stain the process of _ constructing many protects to address this problem (See Exhibit III, 1994-1998 Capital Improvement Plan) i T I. Are there commercial or industrial dischargers to your wastewater system? (Circle one) Yes No I Describer (See Attachment A) (1) Do you have an industrial pretreatment prograr• (Circle one) •s No It yea, describer Consists of Pretreatment Program Coordinator. d:etr"tiso Q,t rA1 AFffe&r~ Prntrpataont inaRACtor asd Z DarL-time Inspector positions. (9) Have you pursued source reduction to reduce the load on your treatment works? (Clrole one) Yes No It yes# describer Thm PretroAtment Pragre ham worked with iodustries to reduce metals loadlugs to levels so that sludge can be bemefically reused. 0. Now are septic tank pump s (sa~ts~e~ Mandl a !ii jiplant or land application site? do o ep sep" a p the treatment plant or lead application site. N. Have YOU oonsldered'devslopment of a plan to address water conservation and/or the reduction of organic and nitrogenous loadings to the treatment facilities by Individuals users? (I.s.t use of flow reduction devices, ban on use of garbage dieposakst etc.) (Circle one) Yes No it yes$ describer 35 t ATTACHMENT A 1992 INDUSTRIAL USER SEWER DISCHARGE REPORT INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGE/G/P/D University of North Texas 522,146 Texas Womens University 3420543 Peterbilt 78,734 Denton State School 680734 Victor Equipment 19,603 Union Camp 16,323 Denton Community Hospital 15,810 Turbo MFG 130994 Andrew corporation 13,277 Jostens 11,067 36 J I. 11 Is your treated wastewater affluent caused outside the treatment facility? (Circle one) Yes No If yea, describes Indus al water is sent to the steam electric generation plant where it Is used for cooling water. (1) What potential reuse alternatives are available? Describes v. ,re ~h In October 1988. 0. Are there ongoing efforts to reduce the quantities of any chemicals (including games) used in the wastewater treatment system? (Circle one) yes Ho N/A If yes# describes X. Has an energy audit bean performed to deterrine the minimum amount of energy needed for efficient operation and maintenance? (Circle one) Yes No If yes, describes L. Is your sludge recycled for beneficial use? (Circle one) ye• No If yes, dsmcribe beneficial uses _LAM anellrn N nn of .furless r nf~al If yes, Ara the requirements of 40 CYR 167 being met? (Circle one) yes (See L) 37 i i H. Do you have a program to collect hazardous household wastes directly from individuals at the wastewater treatment plant or other location to prevent disposal in the wastewater collection system? (Circle one) Yes No If yes, describes N. Do you recover digester gas or have any other type of recycling or special programs associated with your wastewater treatment system? (Circle one) Yes No If yes, describes We use digester gas to heat prisary anaerobic dLQestar. 0. Is your community presently involved in formal pplannin for tr tment facility upgrading. If yes, please describes rreeentLY9 spending a_S ton dollars to upgrade existing treatment plant to hydraulic rA ar f ty of l5 MM. P. Now many times In the last year were there overflow or backups at any point in the collection system for any reason, except clogging of the service lateral connection? Ina times 38 S LOO, LHUN Sihmm 4. boom your treatment system have A written operation and maintenance program including a preventive maintenance program on major equipment items and mower collection system. Treatment Plants (Circle one) yea NA it Yoe, describef Collection 8yetem. (Circle one) fYe No It yes, dencribel Ilia Fjslo service Division lies a flushing schedule for .ptoblem areas, A computerized workorder mnintenance system is being upgraded ~egitrnina this near. R. boom this preventive maintenance program specify frequency of intervals, types of lubrication, typem of repair$ and other preventLve maintenance tasks necessary for each piece of equipment or each section of sewer? Treatment Plant (Circle one) Yes No Collection System (circle an*) I No R. Arm these preventive mAtntonanca tasks, as well as equipment problems, being recorded and filed so future maintenance problems can be asse.eed properly? Treatment Plant (CLtcie one) Yes No Collection System (Circle one) Yes X1000{ ' T.' to An inventory of opera parts and preventive maintenance suppliee maintAined (i.e., oil, grease, pecking, *to.) as specified in your oiN manual? (Circle One) Yen OR U. What portion of the continutng education expenses of the operator-in- charge were paid for by the municipality? _ 100 By the operator? 0 What percentage of the waetewAtor budget is dedicated for training? 39 COLLEC'T'ION SYSTEM (continued) V. is there a policy encouraging continuing education and training for w wastewater treatment plant employees? (cirole one) YiiM No Ss it in writing? (clrole anal No txpl^in polioyl _ln the (!ib as f~i[utlund, certiilcatlon la ruuulrud At each level The ~ttv nrllyldert the time and wonox to achluve the requlrud pertifi atinn k. Describe any major repairs or mechanical equipment replacement tbat you made In the last year and Include the approximate cost for those rspalrs. Do not include major treatment plant construction or upgrading progeae. Stuart Read - 1150 000 for an lnturcuptur to eliminate oyertluwa- 3esch Street - 100,000 to upgrade u problem 11nu. No Any additional comments? ( 4 (Attach additional chests it necesearyol I I 40 4 7NFAIMENl' PLANT Q. Does your treatment system have a written operation and raLntenance program including a preventive maintenance prograwl an major equipment Items and **war collection system. Treatment Plante {Circle one) Ysa NO It yes, describes V U anual for tFeatNeat nlaat for existing _IuMt.1gA_,_Thle PJJJ_h"PRradcd after nremeot uayrade to 15 MD le .slnealssesi. Collection systems (Circle one) Y'ie No It yes, describes Kq Are reaoonsible fop the operation sod mesintenance of IS lift stations. Theme along with the treatment plant have a computer genernled work order preventive maintenance program. R. Doan this prevantiv• maintenance program specify frequency of intervals, types of lubrication, types of repair, and other preventive saintenance tasks necessary for each piece of equipment or each section of sewer? Treatment Plant (Circle one) Ze No collection system (clrcte one) No a. Are thane preventive mAintennnre tank-, as well as equipment problems, being recorded mad filed so future maintenance problems can be assessed properly? Treatment Plant (Circle one) fee No collection system (Circle one) To No T.' IN An inventory of spare parts and preventive maintenance supplies mmintAlned (i.e., oil, grease, packing, etc.) so specified in your 06N manuAi7 (Circle one) no 7 No U. WhAt portion of the continuing educAtion expenses of the operator-in- charge ware paid for by the municipallty7 1002 my the operator? What percentage of the wamtewAter budget is dsdicated for training? 1 ~ i. x fi TRVA174FNT PLANT (continued) V. Is there a policy encouraging continuing education and training for wastewater treatment plant employees? (Circle one) Yes No Is it in writing? (Circle one) ( Yea ` No Raplsin polloye In order for an Uperator to be --ouslble for a uhlft Texas Water Commission requires a "8" Operator license Us.reyplre the same with renewal for "R" ??cause fur )ub cootlnuutlon. W, Describe any major repairs or mechanical equipment replacement that you made In the last year and Include the approximate coat for those repairs, Do not Include major treatwent plant construction or upgrading program. 06 Aeration Basin - New Pill" Su ; 5,775.00 04 Final Seua vales - IAewound Nulur 218,75 _ Primary (S)utb) Mamie pumy> rotor replaced 136.18 02 Return sludge pure reulaeed Mechanical real 421.20 (Us. Below) 11, Any additional ooamuents? (Attach additional shoats if necessary,) l.lalCornus Valve motor/rewound motor 144,10 Replace rake assembly west bar screen 8,065.40 Rebuilt backwauh pump for east filter 19127.45 Replaced 4" pressure vacuum relief valve of dagustur 6,970.78 Replaced natural led valve/PJuae Relay unit ou Roilar 2,685 84 Rebuilt tbickner P UNP(oost) 1049.57 Rebuilt thicknor (west) 1,777.02 Rebuilt tbickaar (west) 1071.05 Rebuilt three pumps 81815,50 Scum pump mouth plant finals 1,603.68 4";7" 2 Total ; 40,481.52 i 4 ~ i POINT CALCULATION TABLI Pill in the Values from parts 1 through 7 in the columns below. Add the numbers in the left column to determine the point total that the wastewater system has generated for the previous year. Actual maximum Actual Values Values Raffisible Part 1e influent Plow/Loadings IO BO Points Part 21 Iffluent Quality/Plant Performance n 310 Points Pert 31 Age of NM?T 2 % SO Points Part Ir overflows and Bypasses 10 100 Points Part So Ultimste Disposition of sludge 50 _ 200 Points 150 in LA 6 TX Part 61 New Development 0 30 Points Part 71 Operator Certiticatlon Training 0 150 Pointe Texas R Louisiana 070 Points TOTAL POINTS Arkansas, Oklahoma i gg New Mexico 920 Pointe 43 H CITY OF DENTON k, 1993 MUNICIPAL UTILITIES FORECAST ELECTRIC, WATER, WASTEWATER, AND SOLID WASTE i I i NOVEMBER 1992 CITY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITY DEPARTMENT DENTON, TEXAS ISECTION 4 ASTEWATER UTILITY NOVEMBER 1992 MY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL UTUM DEPARTMENT DENTON, TEXAS aa F 9 i I SECTION 4 wA$TFwpTEfl UTI,ITY 4.1 INTRODUCTION The water reclamation facility consists of four basic components: • Wastewater Collection System Water Reclamation Plant • Wastewater Disposal • Sludge Disposal The collection system consists of gravity sewer mains, liftstations and force mains. The gravity lines collect the individual customer discharges and transport them to the plant. These lines are not designed to flow full. Pressure could cause these flows to back into residences. Additional flow is sometimes picked up via inflow/infiltration fI/11. Inflow is rainwater entering the system through manhole cover pickholes, broken pipes, open customer cleanouts and cracks. Infiltration is flow entering cracks and joints due to the groundwater level above the pipe. Lift stations and force mains are constructed when flow cannot continue by gravity. This usually occurs in low lying areas or where the line can becomes extremely deep. After CRY OP OINTON UT1UT1[8 4 -1 T i! i many hours and sometimes days in the collection system, the sewage is eventually transported to the treatment plant. Denton's plant treats the wastewater by the waste activated sludge process. The liquid is separated from the solids ,id treated by settling, aeration, filtration and disinfection. The sludge is treated biologically by aerobic and anaerobic digestion. The.treated waste producLo are then disposed of in accordance with strict standards. i I The liquid effluent is discharged to Pecan Creek. This effluent must meet very stringent water quality standards. The digested sludge is either applied to open land by injection or dried and then spread on open land at the plant site and/or used in vaLious municipal use projects. The Texas Water Commission (TWC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are the regulatory agencies which govern the treatment of wastewater in Texas. :WC's rules are published in the Texas Administrative Code (TAC). In part the TAC reads: "Whenever flow measurements for any sewage treatment facility in the State reaches 75 percent of the permitted average daily flow for three consecutive months, the permittee must initiate engineering and financial planning for expansion and/or upgrading of the wastewater treatment and/or collection facilities." MY OF DENTON VnUTIES 4-2 i The TWC and EPA monitor treatment plants by issuing ~ discharge permits. These permits dictate the treatment levels that must be obtained by the plant. Failure to meet theso requirements can result in fines, penalties and expensive emergency construction projects. 4.2 METRODOLOQY The treatment plant utilizes an ultrasonic meter to measure the plant influent. Except for a few major customers, wastewater flows are not measured directly by meters. indirect measures such as a percent of winter water use are typically used to determine wastewater volumes. Table 4.1 provides the number of customers by general rate class. in the 1990 Forecast, wastewater flows are based on a percentage of water use. Further studies have found that this approximation can increase projected flow errors during dry months and years. The 1992 Forecast uses population as the primary variable to derive flow. The 1993 Forecast uses a derived gallon per ca-pita per day. 4.3 WASTENATBR corLECTION SYSTEM The collection system consists of approximately 1.67 million linear feet (317 miles) of gravity sewer mains ranging CITY OF DENTON UTIUT)ES 4-3 6 TABLE 4.1 CITY OF DENTON NUMBER OF WASTEWATER CUSTOMERS FISCAL YEAR RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL GOVERNMENTAL TOTAL - HISTORICAL 190 14,021 2,132 72 16,225 1990 14,261 2,!140 02 16,963 1991 14AO 1,976 at 10,516 1992 14AN 2,066 N 16,602 -PROJECTED- 1963 14,696 2,093 99 16,77 91 17,031 1904 14,621 21120 17,305 1996 15,126 2,169 93 1t" 15,806 2,224 96 17,814 1997 16,800 2,261 91 Isla" 100 11,7e2 1996 16,321 2,341 19,281 109 16,747 2,402 103 2000 11,184 2,464 106 19,764 2001 11,632 2,629 108 20,200 2002 10,093 2,05 111 20,700 2063 10,50 21092 114 21,341 2004 IIA" 21132 117 21,090 19,047 2,803 120 22.470 2000 CITY OF DENTON UTILITIES ' 6 ~ 8 In 4 inches through 33 inches is diameter, 80,911 (15 miles) of force main and 18 active . 643 feet of sanitary sewer is less than 6 iameter, These lines are considered to be because they tend to be very maintenance ble 4,2 provides an ac counting of gravity lines. i Of primary concern to operation and maintenance personnel are main blockages and infiltration/inflow. Grease entering the system is the major contributor to main blockage. The proliferation of garbage disposals has compounded the problem over the past twenty years. Problem mains are flushed on a regular basis as a preventive maintenance procedure. Another contributor to system problems is root intrusion. Tree roots can find there way into the sanitary sewer pipe through cracks in the pipe and through faulty joints. Once roots enter the pipe they can quickly grow and fill the cross sectional area of the pipe causing it to clog, Field Services Division is currently seeking a procedure for long term successful root removal, Inflow/infiltration (i/i) is generally related to old, cracking gravity mains, worn out joint seals and poor manhole construction practices. I/I is difficult to locate because it CITY OF DEMON LMUTiES 6 S w TABLE 4.2 CITY OF DENTON SANITARY SEWER SIZE AND AMOUNT DIAMETER LINEAR (INCHES) FEET MILES PERCENT OF TOTAL 40 643 0.12 0.04 8' 866,469 105.20 31.65 8' 598,862 113.04 34.01 f0' 226,940 4198 12.93 17' 72,113 13.68 4.11 15' 72,887 13.80 4.13 to, 83,284 18.34 4.92 20' 325 0.08 0.02 21' 53,416 10.12 3.04 24 48,500 9.18 2.76 2T 281570 5.03 1.51 30' 11,800 123 0.67 33' 3,250 0.52 0.15 10755,048 332.38 100.00 FORCE MAINS 80,911 15.10 100.00 NOTE: BASED ON HANSEN OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE SYSTEM FORCE MAINS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL CITY OF DENTON UTILITIES e _ x a. a.. does not surface like a water leak. It is evidenced by greatly increasing flows at the plant during a rainstorm. I/I study is a tedious process. The process is dependent upon adequate rainfall events to measure wet weather flow conditions. Infiltration from ground water is found by comparing ground water table levels to sewer line elevations and inspecting those lines constructed below the water table. An I/I study generally involves: Wastewater Collection System Analysis Sectioning the system into primary divisions Measuring wet and dry weather flows • Smoke Testing Identify problem sections Manhole Inspection Sub section problem areas Measure wet and dry weather flows Repeat sub-section process until specific problem lines can be identified Inspect problem lines with T.V. camera to determine type of failure (is., cracks, joints) • Determine if cost of correction is less than cost of treatment. MY OF DENTON UnUTIE0 e - 7 Freese and Nichols, Inc, completed a Wastewater Collection System Master Plan in 1985 which is sufficiently current to serve as the system analysis. In the summer of 1991 the Water/Wastewater Engineering staff began a modeling effort on the Cooper Creek drainage basin, with the help of the summer interns. The model is approximately 90 percent complete and will be used to identify needed projects and help determine appropriate line sizes. The model will also be used in the I/I analysis to quantify and pin point possible I/I sources. Until the model is complete for the three major drainage basins, The Freese and Nichols Collection System Master Plan will be used for project identification. 4.4 WASTENAT8R TRZATMENT The Pecan Creek Water Reclamation Plant has a rated capacity of 12 MGD (millions gallons per day) and an peak design capacity of 18 MOD. The peak capacity is to accommodate stormwater flows. The plant has a permit for 13 MGD. Table 4.3 and Figure 4.1 show the historical and projected average annual influent received by the wastewater treatment plant. The projected average monthly trend for Fiscal Years 1993, 1994, and 1995 are shown in Table 4.4. This table cannot be used for revenue tracking like the average monthly water data because there is no relationship to CHY OF DENTON U71UTIES 4-8 TABLE 4,3 CITY OF DENTON WASTEWATER INFLUENT FISCAL FLOW (MILLION GALLONS PER DAY) YEAR DENTON CORINTH ARGYLE i_ TOTAL - HISTORICAL - 1900 0.31 0.15 1941 4.71 0.17 4.90 1992 a.a1 4.90 1941 4.36 0.08 4.43 t964 4.29 0.00 1.46 °'20 1.46 11$66 9.02 o.u 1144 9.96 0.19 N/A 9.11 1107 9.17 0.21 9.18 Ion 4.1,1 0.19 9.98 to" 9.17 .44 1110 9.94 0.33 0 9.90 1911 s.a4 0.14 0.006 9.91 1 H2 9.06 0 34 0.004 1.42 0.006 4,42 - PROJECTED - 1993 9.01 0.38 19N 9.17 0.001 1.41 1911 0.30 0.006 1.00 9.31 0.42 0.000 9.79 20*00 110.38 0.64 0.1 is I t.13 20101 1144 0.11 01209 12.94 2010 1343 0.14 0.207 t4.40 2018 19.46 0.72 0.200 1147 2020 17.14 0.70 0.211 19.es * a YEAR INCREMEZNTB CITY OF DENTON UTUTIEg 6 _ q 11 FIGURE 4.1 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED AVERAGE ANNUAL 13 WASTEWATER INFLUENT FOR DEMON A CUSTOMER CRIES 12 PROJECTEDAN . NUAL AVERAGE INFLUENT FOR WET YFJARS 11 i 10 . ECTEDANNUAL PROJ . • • AVERAGE INFLUENT • FOR NORMAL. YEARS a 1650 1662 1064 195a 196E 1960 1992 1664 1065 1996 2000 2002 2004 YEAR a 24 i _ 11N 1910 1/q 1 *2 1994 FORECAST FORECAST FORECAST FORECAST FORECAST y...... 29 NOTE 1992 AND 1990 PROJECTIONS CAN NOT BE DIFFERENTIATED I9 . Z 17 . 19 I1 f 1c . FIGURE 4,2 • HISTORICAL WASTEWATER INFLUElff DENTON AND ITS CUSTOMER CITIES ; ANNUAL UENTFORECAS N T 1990 IM IMI ISMS 1MS 1M0 1102 t"4 111014 10M 2000 2002 SM 7000 200 2010 2012 2014 2919 2M9 2000 YEAR TABLE 4,4 CITY OF DENTON MONTHLY WASTEWATER INFLUENT FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1964 FY 199/ HISTORICAL PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED MONTH (GALS61000) (GALS41000) (GALS#1000) (GALS*1000) OCTOBER 253,270 273,668 x77,897 26306 253,270 273,616 277,897 283,396 NOVEMBER 234,600 x88,721 x60,701 x88,046 487,870 134377 534596 549,642 DECEMBER 296,980 27x,988 277,x18 282,904 784,850 803,361 815,817 892546 JANUARY 330,770 293,870 298,121 304,234 1,115, 620 1, 094 931 1,113, 938 1,134 780 FEBRUARY 307,440 273,429 277,887 263,381 1,423,060 1, 374 364 11391,050 1,424140 MARCH 343,480 311,838 316,361 32201 1,764540 11681,899 1,707, 969 1, 74Z 992 APRIL 264,700 302,638 307,328 313,627 4051,240 1,981534 2015,294 2054619 MAY 304,420 303,066 307,768 314,070 2354660 4287,602 2323,059 4379693 JUNE 316,600 307,128 311,600 316,261 Z67ZI60 2594730 2634947 4684979 JULY 283,340 M,473 297,007 303,007 2955,500 2887,203 2931,954 Z99Z076 AUGUST 234,000 x76,272 282,686 268,379 31189,350 3,165,475 3,214,339 3,284415 SEPTEMBER 248,400 263,464 2871678 263,76 3,437,950 3,444959 3,504417 3,374,236 ITALICS • MONMYCUUMULA77YE TOTALS PROJECTED MONTHLY PRODUCTION IS RASED ON PREVIOUS I YEAR AVERAGE CITY OP DENTON UTILITIES 4 - 12 billed wastewater and influent to the treatment plant. Figure 4.2 depicts historical wastewater forecast trends. Again there is a general downward trend in these forecasts but there is more variability in these trends than in the water and population trends due to the wide degree of methodologies used in the past for the wastewater projections. TWC regulations require that planning and design of new or expanded facilities must be initiated when the daily average for three conserutive months exceeds 75 percent of the rated capacity. Construction must be initiated at 90 percent. During 1991 the peak three month average daily flow in the months of May, June, and July were reported to the TWC as follows: MONTH AVERAGE DAILY PERCENT OF FLOW (MGD) RATED CAPACITY January, 1992 10.07 89.92 February, 1992 10.98 91.504 March, 1992 11.08 92.33W Toward the end of 1989 Denton started pumping all of its influent through the plant as it received it. Now that Denton is pumping everything through the plant, during high rainfall years Denton should experience higher peak flows as it did in I CITY OF DEWON UTILMES 4 - 13 I i 9 III 22 FIGURE 4.3 21.00 MGD 21 CITY OF DENTON WITH 1004 . _ - PLANE CUSTOMER CITIES PROJECTED 3 MGD CAPACITY EXP 20 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED EXPANSION . WASTEWATER TREATMENT 110 PLANT CAPACITY • HSTOWCAL FLOWS I Is „ 17 C 16 f....,.... 15 OO MGD PLANT Z CAPACITY 1d ; . „ 1 POSSISIL'fYOF _ _ EXCEEDING RATED _ PLANT PROJECTED PEAK CAPACIYTY 14 3 MONTH AVERAGE POR WET VEARB X17 1... 12 MGD PLANT CAAA NTY 12 i too 11 .........i . I i... 10 . > • f PROJECITEDPEAK Y MONTH AVERAGE T M1, NORMAL YEARS . i . 6 1N0 Im 110.4 110.6 19M 110100 110102 11094 1"6 in$ 2000 2002 2001 YEAR 4 i 22 FIGURE 4.4 21 CITY OF DENTON WRH CUSTOMER CRIES 20 HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED TWC REOUMIEMENT FOR 1e CONSTRUCTION TO BE UNDERWAY 1890MGD „ . . 1e 00% OF RATED PLANT CAPACITY TWC AEQURES CONSTRUCTION TO BE UNDERWAY 17 cE G 1• O 11 . . PROJECTED PEAK ~AGb z 13 3 MONTH AVERAGE FOR WET YEARS (A 13 . d /2 i... s 10 S PROJECTED MM 3 MONTH AVERAGE FOR NORMAL YEARS T „ . e 1040 1042 10M 1040 INS 1No 1e1R 1041 lees It" 2000 2002 2001 YEAR ,a c I 22 FIGURE 4.5 21 CRYOF DENTON WITH _ CUSTOMER CITIES 20 HWOAWAL AND PROJECTED TWC REQUIREMENT FOR 11 DESIGN TO BEUNDLRWAY 16 SOMGU 10 w;75%OFRATED .i....... , PurrrcAPACm TWC FEOURES PUNNING OF EXPANSION ~ I . E 16 _ _ . _ 1575'bkib _ O 11 PROJECTED PEAK OU ' WWTH Z .L..,...,, FOR WET VEAA c 12 . . A is, 10 0.00 MGD PROJLCTEO "AK . 0 P S MONTH AVERAGE FOR NORMAL VIM 7 i „ 1 ; im 1082 10M 1006 Im 1000 Im 100{ 1106 10N 2000 2002 200 YEAR I f 1990. With construction of the new wastewater treatment plant expansion, the equalization basin will greatly help to minimize the instantaneous peaks but will have little to no effect on the peak three month average daily flow. Figure 4.3 provides a comparison of the average annual daily flows with the TWC criteria levels of 75 percent and 90 percent and with planned plant expansions. An expansion to a 15 MGD capacity is currently being constructed and is scheduled for completion in 1994. A new expansion should be scheduled so that construction can be completed in 2002. According to the TWC criteria Denton should already be underway with designing of the next expansion beyond 15 MGD. 4.5 LIFT STATIONS i Denton currently owns and/or operates 18 lift stations throughout its service area. Denton also owns 3 lift stations which have been abandoned. The operating characteristics for all lift stations are described in Tables 4.5, 4.6, and 4.7. Pump run times for a lift station can be used for crude estimation of flow rates through the lift station. Figure 4.4 shows sample run times for all lift stations during both a dry weather and a wet weather period. This shows the effect of 1/I on the lift stations. The run times for almost all of the lift stations at least double during wet weather periods and CfTY Of DENTON UTUTIES 4 - 17 TABLE 4.5 CITY OF DENTON MAJOR LIFT STATIONS PUMPS FORCE MAIN CAPACITY RATED RATED STATIC LIFT PUMP CAPACITY HEAD DIAMETER LENGTH LIFT FIRM MAXIMUM STATION NO. (GPM) (FT) (IN) (FT) (FT) (GPM) (GPM) Qi HICKORY 1 4,200 f 100 Q 4,200! 160 24 1299 126.6 7,300 T~300++ CREEK 3 3,600 190 t x COOPER 1 1,460 00 CREEK 2 1,660 90 16 3,600 64.0 3,100 3, 3 1,660 90 HOBSON 1 3,000 110 16 3,613 06.0 3,400 4,600 2 3,000 110 ff f! 6 6,4N 06.0 300 360 1 3320 65 ~,OfkNTH 20 66 2 ! VARIABLE SPEED PUMPS f• NO DUTY POINT SPECIMATIONS ARE AVAILABLE DUTY POINT 16 ESTIMATED BY THE SYSTEM HEAD CURVE PUMP 1 A 2 ARE HOT DESIGNED TO RUN TOGETHER I I TABLE 4.6 CITY OF DENTON LIFT STATIONS PUMPS FORCE MAIN CAPACITY RATED RATED STATIC LIFT PUMP CAPACITY HUD DIAMETER LENGTH LIFT STATION NO. FIRM MAXIMUM (GPf4 (FT) (IN) (FT) (F1) (GPM) (GPM) BORDER 1 260 25 Cowboy 2 250 26 • 1,008 7.60 270 210 a i UNION 1 460 76 e 76 2 450 76 • 2,489 57 86 410 505 BARROW 1 620 45 2 820 6 1,460 3036 10100 1,300 CAMPING 1 260 25 WORLD 2 280 28 • 1,111 12.40 280 TWIN 1 250 90 LAKES 2 250 • 8,320 79.10 280 010 90 DlNTON 1 800 180 WEST 2 600 too • 6,874 6120 eoo 940 JOHN 1 415 30 KNOX 2 415 00 • a s• DATA NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME e TABLE 4.7 CITY OF DENTON LIFT STATIONS PUMPS FORCE MAIN CAPACITY RATED RATTED STATIC LIFT PUMP CAPACITY HEAD DIAMETER LENGTH LIFT FIRM MAXIMUM STATION NO. (GPM) (FT) (IN) (FT) _ (FT) (GPM) (GPM) GRISSOM 1 275 66 6 2,166 18.60 280 120 2 275 66 1 600 70 i GRANADA 2 600 70 6 2,218 42.60 610 816 LONDONDERRY I 610 26 2 610 25 10 641 26.00 500 875 WIMBLETON 2 I so TO 600 TO 6 as sa as sa VACATION 1 10160 86 8 6,611 57.20 460 476 VILLAGE 2 1,160 86 I-" W 1 610 16 6 2,821 16.05 120 400 2 510 16 'a DATA NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME f R } r so FIGURE 4.6 CRY OFDENTON RNa~ ■ MINm 45 LIFT STATION AUWnME * * _ _ _ _ . D OOMPARISON r 40 C 3 os C w 3 25 20 C N TS rn 0 v+v'd'.~~,o~°'opM'.•a'°b,,,,~dr"` na~r'",,,,,,oM+v' .~►w°,,,~w+u,/~ ~y°" +a~',ow~+M~,,,,~or""~.u~* ~",~,~►+d,~.►~c" v~ LIFT STATION NOTE ALL TIMES EJICEPT FOR HICKORY AEPAMENT THE SUMMATION OF FVN TIMES FM TWO PUMPS IN EACH LIFT STATION FOR A PMOD OF ONE DAY. THEFIEFOW THE MAXIMUM NUN THE POSSI BLE FOR A 24 HOUR PEFJOD 0 4! HOURS. THE HICKORY C REEK LIFT STATION ONLY SHOWS THE RUN TMAE OF THE FUZED SPEED PUMP SINCE THE VARABLE SPEED PUMP WILL MM CONTMAFOUSLY AEGAFI0lFS8 OF THE VOLUME FECEIV ED. IT SHOULD BE NOTED INAT WHEN THE FM ED SPEED PUMP 0 RUNNINO THE STATION MI PUMPINO AT rM MAXMAUM RATE UPT STATIO NS THAT ARE KNOWN TO OVER FLOW AT LEAST ANNUALLY h Fan perience as much as a 20 fold increase during wet periods. Three lift stations (Cooper Creek, es, and Corinth) are known to overflow at least y. Cooper Creek and Corinth lift stations are near y du~•ing dry weather operating periods. The schedule city of the expansion of the Cooper Creek Liftstation will be determined by the Cooper Creek model. The pumps of the Corinth Liftstation are scheduled to be upgraded in January of 1993. The forcemain and part of the gravity line is scheduled to be upgraded in 1994. Five of the lift stations that reach capacity have relatively low dry weather flows and surge significantly during storm events, Infiltration and inflow {1/I) is the major problem for these Stations and it is the 1/I that should be addreosed rather than upgrading the capacity of the lift stations. A lift station must have sufficient capacity to pump the peak day flow with the largest pump out of service. The Corinth, Twinlakes Mobile Home Park and Vacation Village Liftstations are the only public lift station that are currently metered, Consideration should be given to placing meters on all existing and future lift stations. CITY OR DENTON UTI TIES 4-22 II, •4F4%' , TABLE 4.8 CITY OF DENTON LIFT STATION COLLECTION AREAS PERCENT TOTAL EFFECTIVE AREA LIFT STATION/ A REA COLLECTION SERVED DRAINAGE BASIN (ACRES) AREA (ACRES) (ACRES) PECAN CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN 12,560 6,030 46% CCOOPER CREEK 4,560 1,850 40% L--TWINLAKES 510 90 i8% HICKORY CREEK 40,320 460 1% L CAMPING WORLD 40 7 18% BARROW 520 75 14% UNION 76 115 9 8% L BORDER COWBOY 190 37 19% HOBSON 770 430 56% CORINTH DENTON WEST 490 22 5% JOHN KNOX 210 25 13% GRISSOM 120 49 44% GRANADA 400 170 43% WIMBLETON 280 20 7% LONDONDERRY 130 80 63% VACATION VILLAGE 250 20 8% 1436 W 9o 50 60% FORT WORTH DRIVE 2 2,750 780 29% TOTAL $4,308 10,208 14%~ NOTE 1; THE CORINTH LIFT STATION RECEIVES ALL INFLUENT FROM THE CITY OF CORINTH 2; FORT WORTH DRIVE LIFT STATION USED TO BE REFERED TO AS THE COED LIFT STATION, AND IS NO LONGER ACTIVE CITY OF DENTON UTILITIES Each lift station serves a collection area. The size and the percentage of the area served should be taken into consideration when upgrading capacity at any lift station. Lift stations that serve large drainage basins, such as the Hickory Creek lift station, should be considered for locations for future wastewater treatment facilities. it should be analyzed pricr.to the expansion of the station whether it is less expensive to treat the wastewater in its own drainage basin or whether it is cheaper to pump the wastewater into another basin to be treated. Table 4.8 lists the total area, effective collection area, and the percent of the total area served for each of the lift stations and the drainage basins. i i i CRY OF DENTON UTILMIS 4-24 i ti i ORDINANCE NO. JC2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR WASTEWATER SERVICE; ADDING A WITHOUT CITYNEW COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE TO USERS OF DENTON WATER SERVICE (SCN) RATE SCHEDULE, A RESI- DENTIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE TO USERS OUTSIDE OF DENTON CORPORATE LIMITS WITH CITY OF DENTON WATER SERVICE (SRW) RATE SCHEDULE, AND A COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE OUTSIDE THE CITY OF DENTON CORPORATE LIMITS WITH CITY OF DENTON WATER SERVICE (SCW) RATE SCHEDULE; DELETING THE RATE SCHEDULE FOR RESIDENTIAL WASTE- WATER SERVICE TO JJSERS OUTSIDE OF DENTON CORPORATE LIMITS (SRW) RATE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: Z• That the Rate Schedules for wastewater service as provided for in Chapter 26 of the Code of Ordinances, are amended to read as follows: WASTSAATU RATS ScxBDULBB P SR Residential Wastewater Service 3 SC Regular Commercial Industrial Wastewater Service 3 SEP Restaurants i Food Service Wastewater Service 5 SES Equipment services Wastewater Service 7 10 SPT Commercial/Industrial Pretreatment Wastewater Services 12 SCD Commercial/industrial Wastewater Service with Dedicated Water Meters _ SSC Wholesale Wastewater Treatment Service for a 4 Governmental Aqency, Division or subdivision SG Intraqovernmental Wastewater Service 16 SGE Sale of Treated Wastewater Effluent to Municipal 18 Utility Customers SM Metered Wastewater Inside/Outside Corporate Limits 220 1 SRW Residential Wastewater Service to Users Outside of Denton Corporate Limits with City of Denton Water Service SRN Residential Wastewater Service to Users without 23 City of Denton Water Service SCN Commercial/Industrial Wastewater Service to Users 25 without City of Denton Water service 27 SCW Commercial/Industrial Wastewater Service Outside the City of Denton Corporate Limits with City of 29~ Denton Water Service Wastewater Tap Fees 31 Special Facilities Rider 32 Page 2 6CHIDULE 81 RESIDENTI t, wASTEWAT.R RVI (Effective 10/7/92) B~PLICATION Applicable for single family residential service, and individually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities with less than four (4) units. Not applicable for sub-billing or other utility billing by service user in any event. NET .v W= (1) Facility Charge $5.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $1.90/1,000 gallon effluent Monthly billings shall be calculated by using ninety-eight percent (98%) of water consumption for the month as determined herein, up to a maximum of thirty thousand (30,000) gallons. For the months of December through February, actual water consumption shall be used in making the calculations. For the months of March through November, the average monthly rate of water consumption for the preceding months of December through February shall be used in making the calculations. If the customer did not have water service for those prior months, the actual water consumption for the months March through November or 10,000 gallons, whichever is less, shall be used. MINIMUM 9tt.t.tur_ Facility Charge $5.00/30 days RAXW riT Hills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. All services which require special facilities in order to meet customers service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FACILTTY CHARGE Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Page 3 Formula: ,F Actual davs in regains nori 30 days x customer charge VOLUME, xR Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formula: Average yater vo -qX2-- x 9j 1000 x Rate per 1,000 gallons I s Page 4 eceaaoL2 ec COMI~RRPTx~ ~p IND TRIAL WAc[Effective 10/719rxT 2) V R~tlL88 C0_ Api~~ CATION Applicable users and to all commercial and industrial wastewater service to all wastewater service users not otherwise classified under SEP, SES, SPT, SCD, SM or SCN listed herein. (1) Facility Charge $13.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $2,45/1,000 gallon effluent Billing based on eighty (801) percent of monthly water consumption. ~I+I~NALY Ic r+u~n.... Sampling charge (each) Analysis charge (per test $35.00 ) $16,.00 In addition to the above charge for commercial d Industrial service, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: Cuavu ((Bu-250) B + (SU-250) S)) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. BU is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 Mg/lo whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of BOD per 1000 gallons. Su is the tasted SS level for user X or 250 mg/1, whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ($0,00227) for treat- ing one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MItiaMUM BI r rur $13.00!10 days Page 5 P~i~NT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from det a of issuance. UXQA FA"LI c All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FACET-TTY C AQrP Billings for the 'Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading riod 30 days x customer charge VOLLMR C UGP Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formula: Watgr V( x to r 1000 x Rate per 1,000 gallons Page 6 k i F i Q SCURDULN alp RESTAMINTS b FOOD SERVICE wAST...ATRo 4rnvrnF (Effective 10/7/92) APPLICATION Applicable to all restaurants and food service operations which prepare and serve food directly to customers and are categorized by Standard Industrial Code Numbers 5812 or 5813. NET MONTH7•Y RATE (1) Facility Charge $13.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $3.40/1,000 gallon effluent Billing based on eighty (804) percent of monthly water consumption. SAMPLING/ NAT.VCT_ ARU Sampling charge $35.00/each Analysis Charge $15.00/teat SEP EXEMPTIONS (1) Customers under the SEP rate shall be charged the SC rate if only pre-wrapped and pre-processed foods are served from their premises and no food processing is performed on the premises so that only minimal organic material is discharged to the sanitary sewer. The exemption for the SEP class shall be determined by the City of Denton Environmental Health Services Food Inspection Division. (2) Customers under the SEP rates shall be charged the SC rate plus the applicable industrial surcharge if the customer: (a) Installs a wastewater sampling manhole on the sanitary sewer discharge line; (b) Agrees to pay for the city to sample and analyze, quarterly, the wastewater discharge for the fol- lowing: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG), based on the actual costs; and (c) Agrees to pay, based on the industrial surcharge formula, a surcharge on all wastewater discharged that is in excess of 500 mg/1 of BOD and 550 TSS as determined by the monitoring performed in Section 2(b). Page 7 x. MINIMUM BILLING $13.00/30 days INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE The industrial surcharge calculation that applies to equipment services claiming the SEP exemption shall be based on the following formula: Cu-Vu ([Bu-500] B + (Su-550] S)) Where: Cu - is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 500 mg/1, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 550 mg/l, whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ($0.00227) for treat- ing one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. PAXHM Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION ICON OF FACILITY CHARGE Billings for the Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in reading Reriod x customer charge 30 days Vg,LUME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Page 8 6 Formula: Water volume x .8 x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1000 Page 9 E s ' e SCHEDULE 828 EQUIPMENT SERVICES WASTEWATFa cFOt,...~ (Effective 10/7/921 APPLICATION Applicable to establishments which perform washing, cleaning or servicing of automobiles, trucks, busses or similar equipment and are categorized by Standard Industrial Code Numbers 5541, 7549 or 7542. NET MONTHLY ATE (1) Facility Charge $13.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $3.40/1,000 gallon effluent Billing based on eighty (80t) percent of monthly water consumption, SAMMPLINGlANALXU CH_A= (1) Sampling Charge $35.00/each (2) Analysis Charge $15.00/test SES EXEMPTIONS customers under the SES rates shall be charged the SC rate plus the applicable industrial surcharge if the customer: (a) Installs a wastewater sampling manhole on the sanitary sewer discharge line; (b) Agrees to pay for the City to sample and analyze, quarterly, the wastewater discharge for the following: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BUD), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG), based on the actual costs; and (c) Agrees to pay, based on the industrial surcharge formula, a surcharge on all wastewater discharged that is in excess of 500 mg/1 of BOO and 600 TSS as deter- mined by the monitoring performed in paragraph 2(b) of this section. MINIMUM BILLING $13.00/30 days INDUSTRI r. SURCHARGE The industrial surcharge calculation that applies to equipment services claiming the SES exemption shall be based on the following formulas Page 10 l Cu-vu ((Bu-5001 a + ISU-6001 S1) Where. Cu is the surcharge for user x. Vu is the billing user X. volume per 1000 gallons for Bu is the tested 90D level for user X or 500 mg/10 whichever is greater. B is the unit cost ing one unit of factor ($0,00183) for treat- 801) per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 600 mq/1, whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ($0,00227) for treat- SENT ing one unit of SS per 11000 gallons, Bills are due when rendered 15 calendar days from dat0 of n Issuance, past due if not paid within All services which customers service requirements special facilities in order to special facilities rieshall be provided sub most jest to the k I TION OT Tp"1aZ our i Billings for the Facilit annually. y Charge shall be based on 12 billings Formula: ~l1a1 30 days x customer charge Y41`l~ST-St1a$C~e Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period, Formula: Xl vo1Le x a looooo x Rate per 1,000 gallons Page 11 .r a t OCEEDULE OPT COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT WAST ATFR CFAVTfRC (Effective 10-7-92] APPLICATION Applicable to all major commercial and industrial customers subject to EPA Pretreatment criteria or such other commercial and industri- al customers that have the probability of discharging extra strength wastewater or which may have substances in their wastewat- er which are listed on EPA's categorical pollutant list. MET MONTHLY CHARGE (1) Facility charge $13.00/30 days (2) Pretreatment/Program Charge a. Categorical $320.50/30 days b. Noncategorical $ 37.00/30 days (3) Volume Charge $2.4511,000 gallon effluent (4) Surcharge $0.00183/mg/1 of SOD $0.00227/mg/1 of TSS Billing shall be based on 801 of water consumption or 1001 actual metered wastewater. SAMPLING/ANALYSIS CHARGE Sampling charge (each) $35.00 Analysis charge (per test) $15.00 INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE in addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formulas Cu=VU ((Bu-250] 8 + (Su-250) S)) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/1, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost fa.tor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons. Page 12 tSu is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/1, whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ($0.00227) for treat- ing one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM BIF•r.IN $333.50/30 days Categorical 50.00/30 days Non-Categorical pAYMEMT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FACILITY CHARGE ar PRETRFA3ZENT/PV AN CHMGY` Billings for the Facility Charge and pretreatment/ program charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual.S:iys in reading period x customer charge 30 days VOL ME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated dering the billing period. Formula: Water volume 1000 x .8 x Rate per 1,000 gallons ' or Wantiwate volume x Rate per 1,000 gallons fOOO Page 13 r SCHEDULE SOD COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE WITH DEDICATED WATER METERS (Effective 10/7/92) APPLICATION Applicable to all commercial and industrial wastewater service users and to all wastewater service users not otherwise classified under this ordinance whose wastewater is measured by a meter dedicated to water.which is returned into the wastewater collection and treatment system. Not applicable for sub-billinq or other utility billing by service user in any event. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge Billing Per 30 Days 3/4" Meter $ 18.45 1" Meter $ 20.25 1-1/2" Meter $ 23.50 2" Meter $ 28.85 3" Meter $ 60.00 4" Meter $110.00 6" Meter $140.00 8" Meter $165.00 (2) Volume Charge $2.45/1,000 gallon effluent (3) Surcharge $0.00183/mg/1 of BOD $0.00227/mg/1 of SS Billing based on ninety-eight (983) percent of monthly water flow. SAMPLE\ANALYSIS CHARGE Sampling Charge (each) $35.00 Analysis Charge (per test) $15.00 INDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formula: Cu=Vu ((Bu-250) B + [Su-250] S]) Where: Cu is the Surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Page 14 Bu is the tested BCD level for user X or 250 mg/l, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of BCD per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/1, whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ($0.00227) for treat- ing one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM @IJ ING . $18.45/30 days PAYMF.tiT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL Fj%C LITIEB All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FACILITY CHARGE Billing for the Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula., Actual days in reading period x customer charge 30 days VOLUME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formulas Water volume x .98 x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1000 Page 15 kj SCHEDULE BBC WHOLESALE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICE FOR A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, DIVISION OR S (Effective 10-7-92) APPLICATION Applicable to any municipal corporation, or other governmental agency or subdivision which operates a wastewater collection system and contracts with the City of Denton for wastewater treatment service. NET MONTHLY -BM (1) Facility Charge $75.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $1.85/1,000 gallon of effluent (3) Surcharge $0.00183/mg/1 of DOD $0.00227/mg/l of TSS Billing shall be based on one-hundred (300%) percent of actual gallons measured. MINIMUM eILLING $75.00/30 days INDUSTRIAL MCHARGE In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formulas Cu-Vu ((Bu-2501 B + (Su-250] S)) Where: Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested DOD level for user X or 250 mg/l, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of BOO per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/1, whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ($0.00227) for treat- ing one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. Page 16 ,l EAYMEIiT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. Uxclw4juzanu All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FA IL•ITY C ARGR Billing for the Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formula: Actual days in readinc oeri ~ 30 days x customer charge VOL•UMI ♦Rav- Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formula= Wastewater volume. x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1000 EFFECT,JVE DAT£ The charges stated herein shall be applied to all wastewater services provided on or after October 7, 1992. Page 17 I y SCHEDULE Sa INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL WASTEWA.ER SERVICE (Effective 10/7/921 APPLICATION Applicable to all City of Denton Departments and agencies for all wastewater service. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge $13.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $2.15/1,000 gallon effluent (3) Surcharge $0.00227/mg/l of TSS Billing shall be based on eighty (80%) percent of water consump- tion. IHDUSTRIAL SURCHARGE In addition to the above charge for commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formulas: Cu-Vu ((Bu-2501 B + (Su-250) S]) Whores Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu io the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/1, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of BOD per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/l, whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ($0.00227) for treat- ing one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM BILLING $13.00/30 days Page 18 m K PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FACILITY CHARGE Billing for the Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings annually. Formulas Actual days in reading Rario`d x customer charge 30 days VOLUME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formulas Plater volussse x .8 x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1000 page 19 5 } i SCHEDULE BOB SALE OF TREATED WASTEWATER EFFLUENT TO MUNICIPAL UTILITY CUSTOMERS (Effective 10/7/921 APPLICATION Applicable on sales of treated wastewater effluent to any municipal utility. Not available for.resale in any event. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility charge $100.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $1.1011,000 gallon effluent MINIMUM BILLING $100.00/30 days ESYMEtiT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FACILITY CWMGB Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings an- nually and shall be prorated based on the following formula: Formula: Actual days in reading e~ riod x customer charge 30 days VOLUME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the effluent volume calculated during the billing period. Formula: Effluent volume x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1000 Page 20 a SCIEDULE 8H W Eff n~mo +t- (ecti ve1 0/ SI7/ DE9 2 )Cn AEPI,TCATION Applicable to any wastewater service customer desiring to meter all wastewater discharge from a otherwise classified under single customer location and not this ordinance. NET MONTHLY ,TF (Inside Corporate (Outside Limi ,l Sornorata iimit•~ (1) Facility Charge $161.00/30 days $195.00/30 days (2) Volume Charge $2,45/1,000 gals $2.85/1000 gals discharge discharge (3) Surcharge $0,00183/mg/l of SOD $0.00227/mg/l of SS SAMPLING/A_N1~Yg7o .y.~ Sampling charge (each) Analysis charge (per test $35.00 $15.00 Tun MIAL s m iurr In addition to the above charge, there will be added to the net monthly rate for commercial and industrial, an industrial surcharge based on the following formula. Cu-Vu ((Bu-2501 B + (SU-250) S)) Where. Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. SU is the tested SOD level for user X or 250 mg/10 whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treat- ing one unit of SOD per 1,000 gallons. Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mg/1, whichever is greater. S ($0.00227) is the unit cost factor for treat- ing one unit of SS per 10000 gallons. Page 21 MINIMUM BILLING (Within Corporate (Outside LimitAL_ _ Corporate Limits) $161.00/30 days $195.00/30 days PAYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION QF FACILITY CHARGE Billing for the Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings an- nually. Formula: Actual days in readina period x customer charge 30 days VOLUME CHARGE Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formula: Wastewater volume 1000 x Rate per 1,000 gallons Page 22 SCHSDULa SRN RESIDENTIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE TO USERS OUTSIDE CITY nV b NTON CO1ZpORemr * s WITH CITY OF bFNTON WAT R SFOVrno (Effective 10/7/921 APPLICATION Applicable for single family residential sewer customers individu- ally metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities with less than foyr (4) units outside of the corporate limits of the City of Denton and also receiving water from the City of Denton. NET MONTH .Y AT (1) Facility Charge $6.40/30 days (2) Volume Charge $2.50/1,000 gallon effluent Monthly billings shall be calculated by using ninety-eight percent (98t) of water consumption for the month as determined herein, up to a maximum of thirty thousand (30,000) gallons. For the months of December through February, actual water consumption shall be used. For the months of March through November, the average rate of water December through February shalltben usefor d. t If the c customer aids not have water service for those prior months, the actual water consumption for the months March through November or 10,000 gallons, whichever is less, shall be used. XINIM1JM @IIrTANGt $6.40/30 days UX= Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL. FACILIUM All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FACILITY mars Billing for the Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings an- nually and shall be prorated based on the following formulas Page 23 4 Formula: Actuate daYS Sn rw 0 days na 4d x customer charge Y4~~ aRr Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formula: s 1000 x Rate per 1000 gallons fi page 24 SCSEDVLB SRN RESIDENTIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE TO USERS WITHOUT CITY OF DENT N WAT R 0ERVICE (Effective 10/7192) APPLICATION Applicable for single family residential service and individually metered apartments or mobile homes or multi-family facilities with less that four (4) units, without City of Denton water service. NET MONTHI (Inside Corporate (Outside Corporate Limits) Limits) (1) Facility Charge $5.00/30 days $6.40/30 days (2) Volume Charge $1.90/1,000 gals $2.50/10000 gals Minimum volume charge will be for three thousand (3,000) gallons per month. MINIMUM BTf1TNG (a) $10.70 Per 30 Days per resident unit inside City limits (b) $13.90 Per 30 days per resident unit outside City limits PdYMENT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACILITIES All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTILITY BILLS Billing for the Facility Charge shall be based on 12 billings annually and shall be prorated based on the following formula: Formulas ~tual davs in reading ogjoy x customer charge 30 days Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Page 25 i i Formula: Average water volume x .9g x Rate per 1,000 gallons 1,000 Page 26 i SCENDUae ICY COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE TO USERS WITHOUT CITY Qf ~£NTQN WA ER S RVZCF _ (Effective 10/7/921 AUI,ICA= Applicable to all commercial/ Industrial facilities not also recaiving metered water service from the City of Denton, including sub-divisions, for apartments, mobile home parks, or other com- mercial/industrial users. The monthly charge for apartments and mobile home parki shall be based on the maximum number of units served during the month. Other commercial/ industrial users will be billed on a case by case basis. NET MONTHLY RA E Inside Corporate outside Corpo- Limits rate Lf +Wj (1) Facility Charge $ 13.00/30 days $14.41'11,1 days (2) Volume Charge $ 2.45/1,000 gals $2.96/18{s6'0 gams Minimum volume charge will be for three thousand (3,Ca4) gallons per month. SAMPLING ANALYSIS CURGE Sampling Charge $35.00/each Analysis charge $15.00/test INDUSTRIAL. SURCHARGE In addition to the above charge, there will be added to the net monthly rate for commercial and industrial, an industrial surcharge based on the following formulas CuaVu ((Bu-2501 B + (Su-250) S) Whores Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/l, whichever is greater B is the unit cost factor ($0.00183) for treating one unity of BOD per 10000 gallons Su is the tested SS level for user X or 250 mq/1, whichever is greater Page 27 l I r. S ($0.00227) is the unit cost factor for treating one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. MINIMUM BI •f.IN . (a) $20.35 per 30 days per unit inside the City limits. (b) $22.95 per 30 days per unit outside the City limits. PAYMEMT Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance, SPECIAL FACILITi a All services which require special facilities in order to meet customerts service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF UTI .TTY AU U Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually and shall be prorated based upon the following formulas Formulat Actual daysin readins varied 30 days x customer charge 2 Billing for the wastewater volume shall be based on the wastewater volume calculated during the billing period. Formulas calculated wastewater vol+M• x Rate er 1 000 1,000 P , gallons Page 28 b BCS1DUL1 5CW COMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER SERVICE OUTSIDE CITY OF.DENTON CORPORATE LIMS WITH CITY OF DENTgN WATER RRVCE (Effective 10/7/921 APPLICATION ?pplicable to all commercial, industrial or any other facility riot otherwise covered under this ordinance outside the corporate limits of the city of Denton and receiving water and wastewater service from the City of Denton. NET MONTHLY RATE (1) Facility Charge $14,40/90 days (2) Volume Charge $2.85/10000 gallon effluent (7) Surcharge $0.00189/mg/l of ROD $0,00227/mg/1 of SS Billing based on eighty (80%) percent of monthly water consumption. SAMPL11 No AM NA CH~RGZ Samplinq charge (each) $95.00 Analysis charge (per test) $15.00 INDUSTRIAL. SUR MOV In addition to the above charge fir commercial and industrial, there will be added to the net monthly rate an industrial surcharge based on the following formulas CUNVU ((Bu-250) B + (Su-250) S)) Wherst Cu is the surcharge for user X. Vu is the billing volume per 1000 gallons for user X. Bu is the tested BOD level for user X or 250 mg/l, whichever is greater. B is the unit cost factor ($0.00189) for treat- inq one unit BOD per 1,000 gallons, Su is the tested SS !oval for user X or 250 mq/10 whichever is greater. S is the unit cost factor ($0,00227) for treat- inq one unit of SS per 1,000 gallons. Page 29 t MINIIQlIi eILLINa $14.40/30 days e E& M= Bills are due when rendered, and become past due if not paid within 15 calendar days from date of issuance. SPECIAL FACIL TI .a All services which require special facilities in order to meet customer's service requirements shall be provided subject to the special facilities rider. PRORATION OF FAf'I TTY s4nEa Billing for the Facility charge shall be based on 12 billings annually and shall be prorated based on the following formula: Formula: Actual days in reading beriod 30 days x customer charge MQLUU cNARaE Billing for the wastewater volme d during the billing be baud on the wastewater q period. , Formula: Water vol " x Q 10000 x Rate per 1,000 gallons Page 30 I a a t a ~~T~TEA T71P iEEB (Effective 10/07/92) ,'~PP1tIS.~TIS?1{ relocation Of This schedule applies to the installation, removal, or department at theterequest~ of a Yperthe aonCity irmf Denton Utility corporation. T" mra requesAnythats person, of tas ersonal or corporation that relocated by the Utility department hal2 removed 1 installed, or Utility department the following a PAY in advance to the g pplicabl• least j }12TH C- iF.AMOU` Size-- of-Tan. Pave-dct »t Vanaved street 4 inch $710.00 6 inch 735.00 $339.00 8 inch 775.00 400.00 10 inch 835.00 400.00 435.00 FEES FOR TNcTAT_t imrn►~.o 1 n For installation of a tap for which a fee is not specified, the requestor shall pay in advance a deposit based upon the estimated cost of such installation, or similar work, plus an administration charge of 20t. Upon completion of the installation or similar work requested, the customer shall be billed at actual cost, as determined by the Utility department, plus a 20* admin- istrative charge. Any excess deposit shall be refunded to the customer. Page 31 t t BPRCI~, FAOILITISa Rine' (1) A a customer ll service shall be offered from available facilities. If service characteristic devices which are not normally and r adily availableiat the location which the customer requea:s service, then the City shall provide the service subject to paragraph 2 of this schedule. (2) The total cost of all facilities reburied to meet the customer's load characteristics which are 11 urred by the City shall be subject to a special contract entered into between the Utility and the customer. This contract shall be signed by both parties prior to the City providing service to the customer. SECTION II. That if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word 1n this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby declares it would have enacted such remaining portions despite any such invalidity. SECTION Iii That the Snhnduie of Rates herein adopted shall be effe- ctivs,~"rgsd and applied to all wastewater service accruing on or after October 7, 1992. PASSED AND APPROVED this ro 1992. day of BOBERRY r MAYOR 26 CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ATTESTt J T I CITY SECRETARY C OF D No TEXAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMt DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY J BY., Page 32 s Denton Municipal Utilities Morlo • Wster. . WOK. Community 8grVjCN 1994 - 1998 Capital Improvements Plan DENTON TEXAS Dedicated to Quality Service a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GENERAL The 1994.1998 Utility department Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) was developed using the November 1992 Utility Forecast document, current engineering reviews of capital improvements required to maintain, upgrade, or expand the system, and estimates of the revenues and costs over the five year CIP period. The five year 1994 1998 CIP totals $105.888 million, a reduction of 15t compared to the previous 1993.1997 capital program of $124.675. The most significant reduction occurred in the Water CIP which declined $19.1 million (45t), due primarily to a delay in constructing a new water plant at Lake Ray Roberts. The Wastewater five year CIP is $9.6 million lower (42t) than last year's CIP due largely to completion in 1993 of the major wastewater treatment plant upgrade/expansion. The Community Services CIP funding level is essentially the same, although Solid Waste increased and Drainage was moved into the Water department. The Electric department CIP increases $10.1 million (20t) due primarily to the addition of a fuel gag pipeline project. The major Electric department projects in the CIP are $20.0 million for a gas turbine and $10.0 million for a fuel gag pipeline. Both projects support additions to production power and both are contingent upon the results of a upcoming power supply study. These two projects represent 50% of the total five year CIP funding for the Electric department. The Water department's major projects include $5.4 million for otonation disinfection at the water treatment plant, $4,9 million for distribution system upgrade {several individual projects), and $2.6 million for an elevated storage tank. These 1 GENERAL (continued) three projects represent 54% of the total 1994.1998 CIP funding, The Wastewater department's CIP includes three major projects that account for 66% of the requested funding level. Two of the projects involve various individual sub projects; upgrade of the collection system ($4.2 million) and replacement of various sewer lines ($2.4 million). The other major project is for wastewater treatment plant upgrade efforts ($2.4 million). The Solid Waste utility represents nearly 90t cf the entire Community Services CIP. Within the Solid Waste CIP, one project, expansion of the landfill ($6.0 million), accounts fur 684 of the five year program. Another major project is for an alternate disposal facility ($3.3 million). Within Fleet Services, nearly 80t of the total CIP is for a new garage fac. "850,000), with another $110,000 requested for a vehicle wast. ty. The funding sources for the five year CIP by department are shown in the following chart (in millions): Total UQnd $ev AU Other Electric $59.4 39.0 19.3 .3 .8 Water 23.0 14.1 8.3 .5 .1 Wastewater 13.6 8.2 5.1 1 2 Community Serve Solid Waste 8.8 8.4 .4 .0. .0. Community Servs Flt Servs 1.1 •0• _ .5 •0• Total $105.9 69.7 33.6 0.9 1.7 The fallowing department summaries discuss major department issues and goals, significant CIP projects, and financial impacts. 2 i I r ELECTRIC UTILITY Fnt the Eive year period, the Electric CIP totals $6.337 million in fiscal yair 1994, $7.576 million in 1995, $21,437 milliurl in 1996, $19.6A1 million in 1997, and $4,340 million in 199p. No bond sales are required in 1994, but plans exist for sales of $5,0 million in 1995, $15,5 million in 1996, and $14.5 million in 1997. The major Electric Department CIP projects for the five year period are the $20,0 million gas turbine combined cycle installation, a new utility service center at $6.4 million, $10.0 million for gas pipeline construction to coincide with completion of gas turbine-combined cycle and expiration of Lone Star Gas Transportation Agreement, $4,4 million for overhead to underground conversion of distribution, and $4,3 million for underground extensions/improvements. The Electric utility will proceed to fiscal year 1994 with sufficient capacity to meet its operational loads through the mid- 1990's, yet is presently in a competitive position with adjoining utilities facing major additions to their physical plants. To remain strategically positioned with adjoining competitive utilities the following long term goals have been implemented by thei Electric utility: 1. Maintain competitive position with adjoining electric utilities while assuring revenue to meet future operational requirements. 2. Acquire or construct physical electric resources necessary to provide dependable service yet remain competitive with adjoining electric utilities. 3. Continue major programs in automation within the Alectric utility to improve operational efficiency. 3 S 1 ELECTRIC (continued) 4. Communicate with the rate payers and t:mpluyecs :Jt thu utility positions of the utility relative to operations, policies, and future directions. A brief summary of major projects for 1994-1998 CIP submitted by the Electric Utility is listed below: 1. Service Center - construction of a new Service center ($6.412 million) to include the Utility Dispatch, all Electric except Production, all Water except Treatment Plant, Utility Finance Administration, and all commercial Services (Garage, Machine Shop, and Disposal). This project is in response to growth and to improve service delivery, Facility Planning Study delineating whether the existing facility will be modified or a new facility constructed will be made in fiscal year 1994. 2. Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Generator - installation of approximately 38 MW Gas Turbine ($20.0 million) to repower existing steam cycle. This item provides contingency funding for a project anticipated from the Power Supply Study. Project funding for this project is in fiscal years 1996 and 1997. 3. Gas Pipeline - construction of an alternative pipeline source for access to interstate market to avoid being captive to Lone Star Gas Pipeline System with its corresponding high gas transportation charge. The construction estimate for this project is $10.0 million. The project will be finished in FY 1946 and FY 1997. The need for the project is contingent upon construction of gas turbine-combined cycle unit and unsuccessful negotiations with Lone Star Gas bringing cost of qas transportation down to the 10C/mmbtu range. 4 ELECTRIC (continued) 4. Continuous Fmission Monitoring System $350,000 for an effort to comply witlti Fnvirorunental Protection Agency Tirla TV of the Clean Air Act for Spencer Units M4 and 45. 51 Replacement/Upgrade Boiler/Turbine/Control System - $800,000 provides contingency funding for projects anticipated from our Power Supply Study. It will improve safety, reliability, and Low Load Operation. 6. Underground Extensions/ Improvements - to provide adequate and reliable service to existing and new customers ($4.253 million). 7. Overhead to Underground Conversions - to improve aesthetics and service reliability to protect against service failure due to weather, animals, and traffic accidents ($4.4 million). A $2.5 million project for relocation and conversiun of an existing overhead line, University Drive - Denton Center (Malone to Bell) is planned for. Fiscal year 1994. This project is contingent upon joint-agreement with property owners to upgrade and beautify the immediate area. Funding for conversions has been increased compared to the 1993- 1997 CIP level, 8. Mobile Data Terminal Svstem - the mobile data terminal cystem was delayed in the 1993.1?97 CIP for implementation in 1994. $38,000 is requested in the Distribution division, $30,000 in Metering, and $110,000 in Communications. The technological opportunity provided by this equipment is expected to reduce labor costs while improvinq service delivery and productivity. rJ WATER UTILITY The overall Water Department CIP totals $4.112 Milliu:r III fiscal year 1994, $5,149 million ill 1995, $'1,047 miliicn in 1996, $2.998 million in 1997, and $3.707 million ill 1996. No bond sale will be needed in fiscal year 1994. Beyond 1994, bond sales dre projected at $1.0 million in 1995, $5.0 million in 1996, arid none in 1997 or 1998. Water rates are now programmed to increase by 4% in fiscal year 1994, or about $1.17 per month for a residential customer. Rate increases projected for the 1995-1998 period are also anticipated to be approximately 4-61' per year. One year beyond the CIP period, in fiscal year 1999, the utility will begin paying arc additional $2.1 million a year for Lake Ray Roberts water storage rights. Based on the current proforma projections, a rate increase of at least G% will be needed in fiocal year 1999 for the additional water costs. This projection is based on using accumulated reserve funds to limit the necessary rate increase. The proposed Water department CIP provides the facilities and equipment necessary to accomplish the following goals and objectives: 1. Position the utility to attract and support major commercial and industrial development. 2. lfaintain a fee structure which is competitive with other cities that are capable of accommodating major commercial and industrial development. 3. Work with regulatory agencies and other water utilities to develop and apply rules appropriately and allow consideration for each utility's particular environmental circumstances. , 6 M MIA— 1 WATER (continued) . oy 4. (:nntim unisly rc")nitor growth trends in order to plan, design and construct capital facilities in accordance with prudent utilities practices. 5. Continue with development of in-}louse water line replacement capability. Major projects scheduled for fiscal year 1994 include the following: Distribution System Upgrade $1,290,000 Replace Misc Water Lines 1,058,000 Finished Water Transmission Line 251,000 Elevated Storage Tank 330,000 The Ray Roberts Water Treatment Plant, Booster station and Transmission Line have been rescheduled for completion in the year 2003. Some water rationing risks are involved in delaying these projects if drought conditions are experienced during 2000 to 2003 time frame. Currently there are some regulatory uncertainties with regards to water disinfection. The EPA is developing the regulatory strategy for the control of disinfection by-products. The Water department CIP reflects the cost of ozonation at the water production facility which is the worst case scenario from a financial stand point. Recent developments lead staff to believe that actual modifications for the control of disinfection by-products may be less than the coat of ozonation. WASTEWATER UTILITY The overall CIP totals $3.716 million in tiscal yeas 1934, 52.448 million in 1995, $2.728 million in 1996, $2,639 million ill 1997, and $2.107 million in 1998. A $1 million bond sale id expected in fiscal year 1994. Additional bond sales are uow anticipated ac $2.0 million in 1995 and $2.5 million in 1997. When combined with other CIP projects, an overall rate increase of 13t is needed to cover anticipated costs. This equates to a monthly increase in a residential customer's monthly bill ut $2.16. Additional costs associated primarily with the ongoing wastewater treatment plant upgrade translates to a 13 percei, increases in 1994 and 1995. Rate increase-a beyond fiscal year 1995 range from 10t in 1c)96 to a level of 6% by 1998 as the wastewater utility regains financial strength. The proposed Wastewater department CIP provides the facilities and equipment necessary to accomplish the following goals and objectiv..s; 1. Maintain quality wastewater service to the community. 2. Maintain regulatory compliance in all areas of operation of the wastewater collection and treatment system. 3. Reduce excessive collection system infiltration and inflow to maximize the capacity of the existing facilities and postpone facility expansion. 4. Minimize the community's impact on the environment with cost effective, environmentally sound wastewater programs. 5. Develop a long-term beneficial reuse program tot biosolids. B WASTPWATER (Continued) a (,)in nv~ j'~r F rojec [s inclu 3ed i n the 1994 CIF Are the comp] etion ~E the Wasrewater Treatment Plant upgrade to satisfy TWC and EPA !»rmir. requiremernty and the expansion from 12 to 15 MGD ($887,000) ; rhh development of a biosolids composting facility in conjunction with the removal of yard waste from the solid waste landfill ($561,000); the upgrade/replacement of sections of the wastewater collection and interceptor system ($1.281 million); the systematic identification and correction of infiltration and inflow problems ($250,000); and the extension of wastewater collection lines for economic/industrial development ($250,000). The Wastewater department is currently faced with a challenging period over the next five years. With the current regulatory climate, it is anticipated that additional state and federal regulations will continue to impact the department financially. The department has also been impacted by internal issues that affect the way in which projects are funded. The following summarizes some of the more important issues affecting capital expenditures. Current regulations require that the next plant expansion (from 15 to 20 MGD) be underway in 1997 (award construction contract) based on projected flow. EPA and TWC permits expire in 1995 and 1997 respectively. New permit parameters are expected with the next round of permitting (phosphorus removal). 9 k WASTEWATER (continued) Because Of the use of long term debt to finance tt,e acquisition and replacement of capital asset, a shift to a greater use of revenue funded capital is required to achieve a reasonable balance between debt and equity over the five year planning period. A recent -review by the Finance department of water and wastewater financial balance sheet and income statement history determined that the debt owed to the Electric department was a result of money borrowed by the Wastewater department and not the Water department. Therefore, Wastewater must assume financial responsibility for the $6 million debt to the electric department. 10 y DRAINAGE The brainage department ('Ip reflects no additional capital PrnjPOts except for the previously approved projects, Currently, there ire two projects included in 1996, Avenue G Drainage 1$119,009) and Cooper Creek Drainage, Phase I ($502,000). Prone of the projects included in fiscal year 1996 or proposed for fiscal year 1991 have been approved by the voters via a bond election. An existing list of potential projects has been generally prioritized in the event additional capital finding is made available. --Mimi 4 SOLID WASTE C I The overall Solid Waste CIP, a part of the comuiiiry 5ervl:ce P, is projected to be $503,000 in fiscal yeamr 1994, $2.b34 million in 1995, $5.547 million in 1996, $41,000 in 1951, an(] $36,000 in 1998. Approximately Sot of the entire five year CIP i3 in the Landfill division to support landfill expansion. Bond sales are anticipated to be $1.0 million in 1994, $2.5 million in 1995, and $6.0 million in 1996 to pay for the expansion. The goals of Solid Waste are to; 1. Protect the public health by providing regular removal of solid waste from residential and commercial areas. 2. Operate an environmentally safe disposal area at the city landfill in compliance with all regulations regarding facility operations. 3. Encourage waste minimization and recycling through analysis and recommendation of alternative service delivery methods. 4. Contribute to the cleanliness of the community by providing for litter collection. The major Solid Waste project in the CIP is the permitting and construction of the landfill expansion at a cost of $6 million. Of that amount, $500,000 is requested for the expansion's design beginning; $2.5 million for land !acquisition; and $3 million for ~ construction beginning in fiscal year 1996. Funding will be through bond sales of $1.0 million in 1994, $2.5 million in 1995 and $4.750 million in 1996. Government obligation bonds are expected to be sold versus utility revenue bonds. 12 M SOLID WASTE (continued) Ali addition.il significant CIP project is the design and coNstrntion of an alternate disposal facility, estimated to cost 12-4 million, beginning with d?sign in fiscal year 1994. The alternate disposal facility project has been identified as a recycling project; however, the CIP does not reflect a separate division for recycling. This and other recycling projects are included in the Residential, Commercial, and Landfill divisions within the CIP. Approximately $64,000 of recycling capital purchases are planned for fiscal year 1994. i I I 13 FLEET SERVICES The Fleet Services departrt:cnt, .iliich includes tite c,ar~ye, Motor Pool, Parts and Fuel, and Machine Shop divisions, is responsible for providing all City departments with a full range of automotive and equipment services. Funding for Fluat Services is provided by City departments for the goods and services it provides. The five year CIP totals $172,000 in fiscal year 1994, $865,000 in 1995, $20,000 in 1996, $36,000 in 1997, and $12,000 in 1958. No bond sales are anticipated during the five year period. Major goals include: 1. Maintaining productivity levels for repair and service personnel at 80% of total production hours available. 2. Completing all repairs in flat rate time as dictated by the Chilton's Manual for Automotive Repairs. 3. Maintaining shop rates at 85t of rates charge by private facilities. 4. Insuring compliance with EPA and state regulations. 5. Continuing evaluation of alternate fuel options. During the Fall of 1992, the department contracted for a consultant's study of the Fleet Services operation including its systems, management, and operations. The study's preliminary findings and recommendations are currently under review by staff pursuant to a final report. Two of the study's probable recommendations will be for a new repair and maintenance facility, and for a new equipment management and information system. FLEET SERVICES (continued) Frnndiug for rjle flew $850,000 repair facility is requested ill r}~o ficca} year 1985 Fleet Services CIt,. Funding for the new $15,nnn equipment informatiorl system is requested in 1994. Total funding for the Garage, Motor Pool, and Parts and Fuel operation is $1.07 million over the five year period, compared to only $35,000 for the Machine Shop operation. The Machine Shop capital acquisitions generally relate to tools and welding equipment items. 1 I l ..J I 15 it r1 ' `~`k I \L l:ll I V V Llvltl~ I vUIvII~IHFi i ~ y DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES TOTAL CURRENT Alb-IN FUND REVENUE - CONSTR OTHER - - - x 1000) ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT 94 $6,337 10.674 $2,722 6.98ai $3,456 17,916/6 $40 16.60% $119 ooooa 95 7,576 12.7640 $3,762 9.64mo 3,548 18.390/a 49 20.33% 217 o.oo6,a 96 21,437 36.114/6 $179525 44.93% 3,684 19.1ova 50 20,75% 178 o.oo% 97 19,681 33.15% $15,000 38.456/o 4,438 23.00% 50 2015% 193 01.006/0 98 4,340 7.3101o $0 a oo% 4,166 21.59% 52 21.58% 122 o.ooa; $59,371 $39,009 $19,292 $241 $929 WATER DEPARTMENT 94 $4,112 17.87016 $2,672 18.93% $1,338 16.11% $94 18.9t% $8 o.oo0/o 95 5,149 22,37% 31481 24.67% 1,539 18.530/6 90 18.11% 39 o.oo% 96 7,047 30.62% 5,568 39.455/0 1,350 16.25% 97 19,52% 32 0.00% 07 2,998 13.03% 1,411 1o.oo6/o 1,470 17.700/6 104 20.93% 13 0.000/a I 3,707 1s.11% 981 6.9s6/a 2,610 31.42a/a 112 22,54% 4 o.oo0/a $23,013 $149113 $8,307 $497 6 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 94 $3,716 27.25% $2,697 32.93% $953 18.84% $28 17.83% $38 16.24% 95 2,448 17.95% 1,250 15.26% 1,122 22.18% 46 29.336,0 30 12.820/2 96 21728 20.00% 1,499 18,31% 11076 21.270A 26 16.s6% 127 51.27% 97 2,639 19.35% 1,613 19.70% 981 19.40% 28 1783% 17 7.260/o 98 2,107 15.45% 1,130 13.80% 926 18,31% 29 18.47% 22 9.40% $13,638+ $80189 $50058 $157 $234 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 94 $675 6.844 $375 4.46% $292 32.27% $0 0.00% $8 1.431% 95 3,495 35.475,0 2,575 30,65% 371 40.99% 0 o.oo% 553 9857% 96 5,567 56.13% 5,450 64 88% 117 12.936/6 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 97 77 0.780/a 0 0100% 77 a.s1% 0 0.006/6 0 0.0ols _ 48 0.49% 0 0,00% _ 48 5.30% 0 0.000/0 0 0.00^101 $9,866 $8,400 ~$905 $0 $561 6111 /93 14;18 Pg ~ 6 ~ 3 1994 - 1998 CAPITAL 1MPPOVEMENT SUMMARY DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES r_ BOND CURRENT AID-IN I TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 1994 ELE $6,337 42.70% $2,722 32.150/a $3,456 57.23% $40 24.69% $119 68 794u WTR 4,112 27.7100 2,672 31.56% 1,338 2216% 94 58.02% 8 4 62416 WW 3,716 26.04% 2,697 31,86% 953 15.76% 28 17,28% 38 21.97a.c CSR 676 4.55% 375 0.43% 292 4 840/a 0 0000/0 8 4 620o $14,840 $8,466 $6,039 $162 $173 1995 ELE $7,576 40,57% $3,762 33.99% $3,548 53.92% $49 26 49% $217 25 864, WTR 5,149 27.58% 3,481 31.45% 11539 23.39% 90 46.650/o 39 4 65416 I~ WW 2,448 13.11% 1,250 11.29% 1,122 17.05% 46 24,86% 30 3Wo CSR 3.499 18.74% 5755 2127% 871 o.9o% Q o.oo% 553 o oaao $18,672 $11,068 $6,580 $185 $839 1996 " ELE $21,437 5829% $17,525 58.330/a $3,684 s9,16% $50 28.904'0 $178 52.82416 WTR 7,047 19.16% 5,568 1&53% 1,350 21.680/a 97 56o7% 32 9 saga WW 2,728 7.42% 11499 4.99% 11076 17.28% 26 15.030/a 127 37.69 CSR 5,567 15.14% 5.450 18.14% 11,7 1 Ba4% 0 0.000/co 0 o oo;, $36,779 $30,042 $6,227 $173 $337 1997 ELE $19,681 77.so% $15,000 83.22% $4,438 6171% $50 27.47% $193 86 55Ra WTR 2,998 11.81% 21411 7.83% 1,470 21.10% 104 57.14% 13 683a'a WW 20639 10.39% 11613 8.95% 981 14.089'a 28 1538% 17 7.629u CSR 77 0.30% Q 0.00% 7Z 1.11416 Q 0.000/9 0 0 009'u $25,395 $18,024 $6,966 $182 $223 1998 ELE $4,340 4254% $0 0.00% $4,166 5175% $52 25.94416 $122 82 430, WTR 3,707 36,34% 981 46.47% 2,610 33,68% 112 58.035/a 4 2 70yt*4 WW 20107 20 ,660/a 1,130 5353% 926 1195Wo 29 15.03r/o 22 14.w6 CSR 448 0AVVa 0 0.000/0 48 0.62% Q 0004c 0 0000„ $10,202 $2,111 $7,750 $193 $148 6111/93 1418 Pn 17 3 u i,,ir I~l vL:IvIL'IJI ~UIvIti1Nf~Y DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES UtILI]YDEPARTMENTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAI FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) ELECTRIC $6,337 $2,722 $3,456 $40 $119 WATER 4,112 2,672 1,338 94 8 WASTEWATER 3,716 2,697 953 28 38 SOLID WASTE 503 375 120 0 8 Ft EET SERVICES 172 0 172 0 0 TOTAI S FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP $14,840 $8,466 $6,039 $162 $173 I 6111193 1418 1 v a 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES I BOND CURRENT AIO-IN L UTILITY DEPARTMENTS -TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) ELECTRIC $7,576 $3,762 $3,548 $49 $217 WATER 51149 31481 11539 90 39 WASTEWATER 21448 11250 11122 46 30 SOLID WASTE 21634 2,575 59 0 0 FLEET SERVICES _ 865 0_ 312 _ 0 553 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP $18,672 $1 1,068 $6,580 $185 $839 i f i _ I I I 19 6111193 14 18 PR DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES BUNG CURRENT A1D-!N UTILITY DEPARTMENTS TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER x 1000) ELECTRIC $21,437 $17,525 $3,664 $50 $178 WATER 7,047 5,568 1,350 97 32 WASTEWATER 21728 1,499 11076 26 127 SOLID WASTE 5,547 51450 97 0 0 FLEET SERVICES 20 0 20 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP $36,779 $30,042 $6,227 $173 $337 I 6111193 t4.16 ~I UAHI IAL Ih1PROVEMENT SUMMARY DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES BOND CURRENT AID-IN - UTILITYDEPARTMENTS TOTAL -FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) ELECTRIC $19,681 $15,000 $4,438 $50 $193 WATER 21998 1,411 11470 104 13 j WASTEWATER 21639 11613 981 28 17 SOLID WASTE 41 0 41 0 0 FLEET SERVICES 36 0 36 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1997 CIP $25,395 $18,024 $6,966 $182 $223 21 6111193 14'19 Pg I I o- ye~ t DENTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES BONO CURRENT AIO-IN UTILITY DEPARTMENTS TOTAL FUN) REVENUE CONSTR OTHER x 1000) ELECTRIC $4,340 $0 $4,166 $52 $122 WATER 3,707 981 2,610 112 4 WASTEWATER 2207 11130 926 29 22 SOLID WASTE 36 0 36 0 0 FLEET SERVICES 12 0 i2 0 0 TOTALS FOR YEAR-1998CIP $10,202 $2,111 $7,750 $193 $148 6111193 14.19 Pg 22 a S, r ~ r, l r ~1 Ar'TIIAI. PI it1,}Fr F, IIPJA IF FV Fv F'{ r 1993 1n99 1933 1b95 19%6 199; 1 P9 1T,erlhn neVe nJ?t Af11~ F!n~lric nP?I1r1n9 151 792 $51 597 $51 597 $55595 $59,271 $63110 366.633 $59 ,r~.' T '4a!er ()palann9 11.412 12 893 12 893 13,670 1 Mri43 15,561 16,671 1 7 9411 1 W,c1 ewat?r Opeaahng 6 441 7 313 7 313 8 615 9,971 11 252 12460 1 3 ?,41 4 ;Dili} Waste Operating 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ 5 r'n'nn'ge a o a 0 0 0 0 0 5 111,111y Operatng ne~enui 69 631 "7► 1,804 71 8 4 77 8B $83,78 369,922 11 5 $101,62 5 Other Revenues 7 EingnC Miscellaneous 93t S07 507 635 655 661 678 691 9 TMPAIOff Sys ICapanq 11,702 10,7t3 10,713 10,700 11039 11.257 12,057 10957 9 Water Miscellane-~)us 45 116 133 190 195 211 228 248 10 WasteNater Miscellaneou 12 31 57 33 55 35 37 39 11 Solid Waste Miscellaneo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Drainage Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Total Operating A Other $a2324 $83.177 $83,217 S89,437 $95,729 $102,093 $1ca.785 $113 Sri Operating Expenses 14 Payton $0.668 $9873 19,873 59,988 $10,560 $11,076 111,630 $12232 15 Supplies 1,024 1104 1,204 1,240 1,278 1,316 1,355 1,335 18 Maintenance 4,098 5,028 5,028 5,120 5,398 5,669 5,938 6,251 17 Services 1.437 2,457 2,457 2,486 2,582 2,62 2,186 2,894 18lnsurance 835 694 694 039 $69 700 733 767 19 Sundry 662 Be? 887 968 t,012 1,059 1,107 1,157 ^urchased Power 41,465 43.495 43,498 14,194 15,960 17,683 19,277 19.860 jet IPurchased Water 3,099 3,172 3,112 3.766 4,153 4,547 4,819 5,120 ee Fixed Assets 1,282 3,481 3,481 5,208 8,212 8,113 6,4192 7,705 23 Pad Debt 238 350 360 369 419 450 479 508 24 Contribution Mir Pool 288 156 158 354 59 97 41 38 25 Other 38 23 23 23 Z3- 23 2~ 23 25 Total Opetatinq Expense $83,132 $10,639 570,839 344,466 $48,325 $51,413 $55,060 $57,950 I 27 Net Operating Revenues $6,503 $971 $971 $33,414 $35,459 $38,510 $40,105 $43,676 Non -Operating _Erpenses/jAeyenues) 28 Interest - Operating ($9,119) 1$2,229) ($2123) ($2,390} ($2438) ($2,487) (1112,537) ($25971 29 Admin Trans CS Admm (35) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Debt Service 1,753 7,827 7,821 7123 7,563 7,921 9,428 10,512 31 net On Inv Trans 4,016 4,016 4,078 4,442 5,134 5,805 6,609 a,257 12 Debt Issuance 193 210 214 205 2117 521 952 912 13 load Management C1edi 189 250 100 880 903 921 952 928 14 nay nobertsinebate 4,210 2,440 2,440 2,562 2,562 2,562 2,502 2,562 15 Landfill Closure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Admnlstrstive Transfers 2,772 2,911, 2,911 3,090 3,1113 11,310 3,112 3,579 17 totalNnnoperaling IAevs St6,978 11S,485 $15,744 518,683 311,194 11116,590 $21,409 124.223 11 Expenses 19,110 06.3to 86,578 01,148 65,519 70,003 78,489 82.173 19 Net Income, Cash Basis 112 (53 .till JU 9I.1) ;28.289 $30.21 s3j,ooQ $31,,307 401nleresl - Nonoperating 4,990 4,169 5,503 5,578 6,271 1,012 7,309 6.163 41 Fired Assllq 1,468 3,565 3.575 5.302 6,553 6,374 0193 11287 41 VFM Principal 3,951 3,535 3.535 3,635 3,615 4,008 4,180 4.145 apreniatinn (6,151) (6,106) (6,926) (1,401) (6,003) (01061 (918¢6) (10,500) #1 Income Full Accrual $4,812 52,022 $2,826 $35,323 $3s,q,4r} $4offli 40,911 540,214 23 i , r i L,II.,I r ~,LhH'.~L'r w 'tr•r ,JL.rL'r Lr IS X 1~~U1 i f3ond Current Total Funds Hr+enue AC Ulter 1 Q94 ~Erednc $5.868 $2 722 $2 987 540 $1 19 Water 3,994 2,474 1.398 94 6 Wastewaler 3675 2.703 910 24 38 Solid Waste 507 375 132 0 0 Drainage 0 0 0 0 0 Total St4.044 $8294 $5427 $155 5165 100 03°i 59 061% 38 649. 1 1 3°i 1 174 995 Electric $7.576 $3.762 $3.548 S49 $211 Water 5.149 3,481 1,539 JQ 39 Wastewater 2,445 5,250 1,122 46 30 Solid Waste 2,686 2,575 111 0 0 Drainage 0 0 0 0 0 Total $17,a59 $11,068 $6120 Sias 5286 10000% 61 9756 35 39% 1 049. 1 6096 Electric 521,437 517,525 $3.664 $50 $178 Water 7,047 5,568 1,350 97 32 Wastewater 2,125 1,499 1,075 26 127 Solid Waste 5,599 54450 149 0 0 Drainage 0 0 0 0 0 Total $36,511 $30,042 $6.259 Si 73 $331 10000% 6161% 17.00% 047% 092% Electric (19,661 515,000 $4,438 $50 $193 Water 2,996 1,411 1,470 104 13 Wastewaler 2,639 1,613 961 28 11 Solid Waste 93 0 93 0 0 Drainage 650 639 0 0 0 Total $2a,C50 $16.663 56162 $162 1223 100.00% 1164% 266051 0,70•: 0665. 1449 Electric $4 340 SO $4,166 $52 $122 Water $3707 951 2,610 112 4 Wastewater 2,107 1,130 926 29 22 Solid Wil Be 0 as 0 0 Drainage 0 0 0 0 Q Total $10,242 $2,111 $7790 $199 $146 10000% 20.615i 78 06% 1.685. 1 451a 94 - 98 EIQCtIIC $50.902 $39,009 $15,823 $241 $829 Water 22,69$ 13,935 8,367 497 96 Wastewater 13,597 a 195 5,015 153 234 Solid Waste 6,973 8.400 513 0 0 Drainage 639 ¢~9 0 0 0 , r 1 Citand Total $105,006 $70,178 $22,776 5891 $1159 10000% 665351 31,22% 0855. 1109• 24 x 3 1 ii, ,M t~nrl BONUS AID +N CONSTRUCTION K,rrtinq T01.71 Electrie Wa1ei WW SON orpm Total Electric 'Naln WW SW via n X99`' o:n 400 345 925J 0 0 109 42 38 29 0 F r??1 ' 1 11 C 7 %12 2 641 2 571 0 0 116 40 SO 26 0 p 1?9J 79t9 2.722 2,494 2.703 0 0 ISO 40 94 24 0 L 1995 a.413 3,762 3.161 1.250 0 0 IDS 49 90 46 0 0 1995 24 592 17,525 5.566 1,499 0 0 173 SO 91 26 a 0 1991 18,024 Is 000 1,411 t,613 0 0 let 50 104 28 0 0 I 19911 2.111 0 99.1 1,150 0 0 193 5; 29 0 0 94 - 99 561,139 $39,009 $13 935 %6.195 f0 90 (891 $241 $497 $153 $0 $D 100 0076 63 60% 221991 13 40% 000% 0.00116 100.00% Arm 511 71% 17 17% 000% 0 00.6 REVENUE OTHER 1V Ending Total El*etrle water ww $w ot41n 'Total Er•co-+e Water wW Sw OINn 1992 1,278 1,022 180 76 0 0 1,281 165 921 189 a 0 1999 3,418 2,148 1.092 238 0 0 313 18s 15 1s 0 a 1994 5.295 2,911 1,398 910 0 0 183 119 a 36 0 0 1991 6209 3,548 1.539 1,122 0 0 288 211 39 30 0 0 1998 6,110 3,664 1,350 1,078 0 0 337 178 32 121 0 0 1991 8,069 1,436 1,410 901 0 0 223 193 IS 17 a 0 +998 1,702 4,168 2,610 926 0 0 141 12; 22 0 0 94 „ 98 132 205 11e.013 18.361, 15015 10 $0 $1,159 1629 196 1234 90 1a 10000% 56 4576 29 98% 1 S 5116 0 0076 000% 10000% it 13% 124% 70 4% 00014 0 0014 ' Not Inr.ludiId m Totats 25 UTICITY DEPAN141ENT ANrI,,,iPAIEU b,jNJ :,AIE~ S X I OOGI r~ 1 Total Electric Water Wastewarer S Waste D+ainaya F Y Bond Bond bored Bund Bond 3vn 1 Endny Sales Sales Sates Sales Sales Sales 1992 6 4 500 0 0 4 500 p p 1993 • 5 500 0 J 6500 J p 1994 1.000 0 0 0 1,000 0 1995 6,500 3.000 1,000 2.000 2,500 U 1995 24,150 15.500 5,500 0 4 , 150 U 1997 17.000 14,500 0 2,500 p 0 199E 0 Q 0 t) 0 p Total $51,250 $33.000 $5,500 54.500 $8,250 $0 Not included in Totals 26 Fr1of CIP New CAP F Y Bey'^mnq Bonda Bands Bonds Bonds interesl Ending Endmq Balance Sold Availabte Used Used Earned Balance 19o2 14.942 45n0 t9.442 t.505 0 1,3t2 17.591 1993 1 7,591 r, 500 24 091 to 996 0 513 13.606 t994 13 606 1 .000 t 4.606 0 8.620 $04 6,462 1995 6,492 8,500 14,962 0 11,068 602 4,516 1996 4,516 24,750 29,266 0 30042 916 140 1991 140 17.000 17,140 0 18,024 492 (3921 1998 (3921 0 (392) 0 2.141 (771 (2560) UTILITY DEBT PAYMENTS I$ X 1009) Bond 6ND °w FY FY FY FY FY FY Sales TERM 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1995 Series 83-85 $33,041 Act $3,456 $3,203 $2,953 11,846 11,668 (1,399 1988 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1981 17,485 Act 1,415 1,410 1,409 21313 2,223 2,128 1988 3300 Act 395 316 361 344 328 315 1989 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1990 20,000 Act 2,384 2,294 2,204 2,114 2,024 1,934 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1992 4,500 Act 381 305 305 415 409 409 1993 8300 7.0%120yr 0 520 512 504 497 489 1994 1,000 7 5%120 yr 0 0 93 94 92 of 1995 8,500 15%120yf 0 0 0 eoa 795 782 1990 24.750 7 5%120 yr 0 0 0 0 2,351 2,314 1997 17,000 7 5%40 Vi 0 0 0 0 0 1,615 1996 0 7 S%120 yr 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 TO TAI $136,276 $9,033 16,110 11,839 18,433 $10,311 $11,446 Note All bonds are programmed to pay 2% principal per year for Veils I - 5, and 6% annually for the remaining 15 years. All 1993 - 1998 bonds are programmes to be sold in Morch,with the first payment not due till the next Fiscal Yeaf (December) 27 .e i UTILITY UEBTIEQUITY FY Ending Debi Dew 6 Ratio Raho Egw1y Equity Debi Equ ty 1969 39.788 85 265 125.054 0 32 0 69 1990 56,765 92.598 149,364 038 062 11-91 53,136 101,439 154.571 0 34 066 1992 53,980 108,t26 162,105 033 0 67 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 ELECTRIC - WATER - WASTEWATER DEBTIEQUITY FY r ding Debt a Ratio Ratio Q1w Cully Equity QM 9gupy 1989 38,610 85,475 124,085 031 069 1990 55,710 93,003 146,713 037 063 1991 52,205 101,837 154,042 0 34 0 66 1992 53,170 1084430 161,600 0,3 061 1993 1994 1993 1996 1997 .ource, Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports 28 I a ~'S'~Jl,lt~; rny:iRU'lu?N 4 f~NAI`JCiAt. 04 TA ELE( }fUC, f V i It x 1x7001 E°Ceni Ae Enrlin 9 r "r-?F;3 ng Avg Rq Niq g Bills MWH y opus Change 1902 27 770 7x;7009 FS1R752 KWH CnfsIKWH KWH 1 n43 27 5(,(] 912754 00675 00053 -288°i Igryq 27544 915.517 51 597 00535 00049 -510°s 55 In9;, 28035 '1101336 00682 00045 u 59 27t 3 00 ° 1997 29202 857.8F2 53110 00796 00043 300.: 1998 2290) 55 979,975 56 633 0 0757 00056 3 00. 902686 69 900 0 0774 0 0067 3 00"m WATER 300% FY Avgx IfX10001 End e Operating Avg Rev Avg 0 S Expe ing _8915 GAL ,IhtG! Revs Ral t992 16,511 JMG) (11.442 (1.000A2I 71000gal Change 1993 16,336 4,033 12.893 f3 02 0 7656 11 40% 1994 16,819 4,165 13,670 3 20 0.6644 S 90% 6140 1995 17,075 4,465 14,$43 332424 0 05434 600% 1996 V,4,^5 4,728 15,561 .5112 6.00'5 1997 17,864 4,970 3 29 0 5112 6 00% 1998 18,325 14,671 3.35 0 5481 5,186 17,883 6 00% 345 0.4973 600% WASTEWATER F Y Avg 4+ Operating T00 1 Monthly Monthly Expeld Ending Bills Avg Rev Debt Serv Rate Pev's 1992 16,71 } 18 140 Customer Customer Change 1993 16,670 E32.11 34 sa 11 53% 1994 7'9$3 36.56 6 32 1400% 18,781 8,615 42 78 1995 18,953 9,97t 4901 426 15.00% 20o% 1998 17,127 11,252 54.75 79 11 93 115 1997 17,302 12,180 60,11 8 72 1200% 1998 17,48c 13,043 8.72 I 0 00% 6800 9.14 }p 00% SOLID WASTE RESIDENTIAL F Y Avg * Cublc (t X 1000) Av Rev Expctd Ending Bit's Yards 9 Customer Rete 1992 178,918 Revs Customer Char99 Change 72.861 1493 178,116 76,723 : 1014 9.95 000% 1 ,499 1991 180,210 75,357 1068 10,65 704% 1995 181,844 2,030 11 24 11.25 S65% 1938 184,084 77.455 2185 1201 1200 ,6,65% 79,380 2,364 1997 186,804 61.353 12.77 1245 7,10% 1994 149,734 2,571 13.71 13,15 1.00% 83,375 2,800 14 74 14.75 7 25% SOLID WAS tE_ COMMERCIAL F Y Avg # Cublc If X Iooo) Av Rev Expeld Ending Bills Yards Avg Rate Rate 1992 15,4 t8 Rev} Customer Chance 1993 18,120 241,S9S 51,751 11357 0.00% 1994 18,1/0 261,759 2,265 124 97 3.50% 260,073 2,354 124 95 1995 19,118 263,715 2519 13176 700% 1996 19,512 287,732 2,695 134.12 700% 1997 19,992 274,184 1996 2,614 141 25 1.00'1 20,520 281,011 3,088 15037 7.00'1 29 I I 12 01 PM ACTUAL BUDGET ESl btaOtiET rY F I t " 1992 199! tvi3 t'»4 19aS Id~u i'eil 'e~❑ I Denton Sales ll 3 453 31154 3 654 J 031 4 3 a95 1 993 4 i J5 a 2 Resale Sales IMG) J37 350 3d0 15u 500 V'16 n 7> 3 Total Sales (MG) 3, 790 4 033 4 033 4 lb5 4,465 4 720 4,9/J v 4 Denlon Cunt Rev11000 Gals $3 09 $3-32 $3 32 $3 40 $3 56 $3 72 s dd 5 Resale Cust $11000 Gals $2 29 $2 01 $2 01 $1 93 $1 12 $096 SO 66 6 Total Rev/1000 Gals 33 02 $320 $320 $3 25 $3 24 $3 29 $J 35 $3 4. Rate Revenues 7 Res,dential $4 902 $5,776 $5,776 $5.965 $6 384 $6 832 67 312 37 b.c a Commerdal 5.455 64044 6,044 6,655 7.123 1 623 8 159 6 l is 9 lniragovernmentat/Pavv 313 312 312 351 376 402 430 4uu 10 Resale 772 762 762 698 660 704 110 ens 11 Total Rate Revenue 11 44 $12,99 3 12 893 13 670 14 543 $15561 16 671 $17_b7 I Other _R_e_v_enu_e_s_ ' 12 Tap Fees 0 35 35 55 60 55 it 7d 13 Coidorm Analysis 31 20 20 30 33 36 39 43 14 Aid in Construction 0 50 50 94 90 91 104 112 15 Meter Tampering 0 1 1 1 1 1 s 1 it Gain!(Loss) FA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Ill Income 5 t0 30 10 11 12 13 14 18 Other 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 19 Total Operating 8 Other 511,488 $13,009 $13.029 $13,860 $14,738 $15.772 516.899 $V3 131 OperaLing. Expenses 20 Payroll $2,104 $2,227 $2,221 $2,265 $2,430 $2,554 $2,684 $2 621 21 Supplies 430 517 517 533 549 565 582 591 22 Maintenance 764 942 942 989 14038 1.090 t,t45 t 2u2 23 Services 259 477 477 501 526 552 560 c~~d 24 Insurance 77 31 31 28 29 30 J2 14 25 Sundry 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 26 Production Power 467 516 576 605 635 667 700 27 Purchased Water 168 91 91 96 101 106 111 i ! 25 Fixed Assets 180 1,092 1,092 1,398 1.539 1.350 1,470 261J 29 Bad Debt 38 65 65 68 73 is 83 6i 30 Cont Motor Pool 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 31 Other D 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 32 Total Operating Expenses 4 541 6 022 6 02 M 48i 6 925 6 97 $7,39 2 9 821 33 Net Operating Revenues $6,902 56,871 Sil $7,181 $7,618 $8,564 $9,279 $9 ctie Nonaperating_(Aevenues)_Expenses 34 Operating Interest (255) (93) (50) (55) (56) 157) (561 10k.1 35 Repayment 0 Soo 0 0 0 0 0 u 36 Debt Service 2,786 2.463 2.680 2,551 2,437 2.417 2.124 2.571 37 Pet On Inv Trans 843 943 943 1,134 1,270 1,486 1,760 2.1Jb 38 Debt Issuance Expense 0 16 16 16 16 to 18 16 39 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Ray Roberts 2,059 2,440 2,440 2.562 2,562 2,562 2.562 2.502 41 Admen Transfers Meter Rea 0 0 0 125 131 136 145 152 42 Admin Transfers Gen. Gov. 612 649 649 677 704 1,32 761 701 43 Total Nonop (Revenue) ExF $6,047 $6,918 $6.677 $1,016 $7.064 $1,299 $7,912 Sts 1b1 44 Expenses 10,587 12,940 12,700 13,505 13,989 14.296 15,304 11 ouJ 45 Nei income Cash Basis 401 0 $355 $749 51.476 11 595 3-1 6 46 Non-Operating Interest 584 231 458 422 368 457 231, 1vu 41 Fixed Assets 160 1,092 1.092 1,398 1.539 1.350 1.410 t,blu 48 Debt Pundpal 1,361 1,137 1.242 1,231 1,236 1249 1 316 1 Z/3 (2,460 (2,S~a1 eel 49 Depredation (2.04 (2,097) 121l (3,16!1 (21302) 50 Net Income Full Accrual Bi W! £49s1 1122r IIla VIN X2,069 $ilIs } 51 Debt Coverage 2 91 2,78 2 90 3 14 3 43 3 46 3 67 52 Total Op Revenue Normal $13,670 $14 543 53 Total Op Revenue Wet 12,22) 12,323 54 Wei Op Revenue Loss 30 $1,446 $2220 p MATER 1994 1995 1996 1997 1996 Popdlhon ~i~p'wlh 1 550% 2 05% 2 05% 2 050% 2 05°e 11lpnhn C,31e5 IMlil 4 40'% 2 11°% 2 53°% 2 560. 2 56°. 2 Rn5110 Cale5IM(7%) -7 6916 68 3806 24 56% 19 05°s 12 571, 1 T7111 S.31g5 (MG) 3 26°% 7 68% 5 43% 5 120. 4 344. 4 oemmn Cust new 000 Gals 2.41 % 4 71% 4 49°% 4 30°% 4 38% 5 Resale Cust V1000 Gals -0 72.4 -43.83% -14.38% -8 13% -0 21•% 5 Total nav11000 Gals 2.50% -1 22% 1.54% 1 82% 2.99% Rate Revenues $131 $145 5156 $167 $179 7 Residential 6.00% 600% 600% 600% 600% 6 Commercial 6.00% 6,00% 600% 600% 600% 9 intragovemmentallRaw 600% 600% 600% b 00°% 6.00% 10 Resale 000% -4383% -1438% -613% -021% 1 1 Total Rate Revenue 6 02°% 6 39% 700% 7 13% 1 27% Operating Expenses 20 Payroll 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5,00% 5.00% 21 Surphes 300% 3.00% 3,00% 3,00% 900% 22 Mamlenance 5.00% 500% $,00% 5.00% 5.00% 23 cervices 500% 5.00% 5.00% 5,00% 5.00% 24 Insuuance 500% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.001% 25 Sundry 500% 500% 5.00% 5.00^% 5.00°% 26 PnducbonPower 500% 500!% 5.00% 5.00°% 5,00'% 27 Purchased Water 5,00°% 5.00°% 500"% 5.00% 5.00% 28 Pixel f15s9t9 2802% 10.09% -12.20 % a.09% 77 55% 29 End Elnbl 5 1S% 6.39% 7.00% 7 13% 7 27% 30 Cont Molor Pool 000% 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% 0.00% It nlhel 000% 000% 0.005% 0.00% 0.00% 32 Total Operating Expenses 7 75% 5 72°% 1 04% 5,65% 19 335% 44 Expenses 634°% 356% 219% 7.C5% 11.10% 31 .'rA1e~ n~~r,u Furrii [x(lcri,l tule5 u(Jul 94-~18 Poor CIP Nex CiP F Y Beginning Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds V,lerest EnJir,,Y "u End.m9 Balance Sold Avail Aula UsaJ U;eJ EamaJ Boian. 1991 7,187 J 7,1$17 18 D 564 1 7u8 1992 7,768 0 7.768 1100) 0 584 a 252 1993 8252 0 8252 1,345 9 276 7.1tl5 1994 7,185 0 7.155 0 649 242 4.779 1995 4,779 1,000 54779 0 3.481 188 2,486 1996 2,486 4,500 6,986 0 5,568 277 1695 1997 1,695 0 1,695 0 1,411 51 3J5 1998 335 0 335 0 981 10 lb36) WATER OFBT PAYMENTS X 1000) Bond % FY FY FY FY FY FY Sales ML 1933 1994 1495 Series 1996 1997 99E 83-85 $7,846 Act $942 5667 $793 5365 $327 5272 1986 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 1957 6.942 Act 552 560 559 915 882 844 1988 2,500 Act 282 270 258 245 234 225 1989 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 1990 7,500 Act 594 860 827 793 759 725 1891 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1992 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 1993 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1994 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1995 1,000 7.5% 0 0 0 95 94 92 1996 4.500 7,5% 0 0 0 0 428 421 1997 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $999 0 0 0 0 0 il 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL $30.288 $2.680 52,557 $2,431 $2,417 $2,724 12 579 Note All bonds are programmed to pay 2% principal per year for years t - 5 and 6% annually for the remaining 15 years All 1993 - 1998 bonds are programmed to be sold in March, with the first payment not due tilt the nest Fiscal Year (Decembeo 32 "S }q 1na1tOTAt r7OSIs 1902-73 TOTAL. rf)STS COSts C03 Its 1000 GAL CO3T3 costs 1000 GAL tlenPncA'°vltilriV 3453 3654 R<eale SAI°s IMGI 337 380 TOeni Sales lryl(iil 3 700 4 033 OpPrabnq Expenses r`gyrr l! 52 104 11) 41% s0 56 52,227 17 45"6 s0 55 SuPPIPS 470 197% 011 517 406"'Y 013 MAinlPn lnro 764 7 04 ; 0 20 942 7 38% 0 23 ~erv'ces 259 2 3916 0 07 477 3 740. 0 12 n5'.r6lnCe And Sundry 77 0 71 06 0 02 36 0 2606 0 01 Production Power 467 431"6 012 576 452% 014 Purchased Water t6a 1 $506 004 91 072% 002 Feed Assets 180 1 66% 00S 1,092 8 57% 0 27 Bad Debt 36 0 35% 001 65 0 5196 0 02 VacaborlSpck 53 0.45% 001 0 0 00% 0 00 Total Operating Expense 14,541 41 66% $1 20 $6.022 47 24% $1 49 Repay LT Debt $0 0 06% $0,00 $0 0.00% $000 Debt SeNrce 2.786 25 71% 0 74 2,680 21 02% 0 66 RPt On Inv trans 843 7 77% 0 22 943 7 40% 023 Admin Transfers 512 565% 016 649 509% 016 nay RobertsPmis 2.059 1897°6 0.54 2,440 19.14% 060 Upper Trinity 0 000% 0.D0 0 000% 0 00 Other 0 0.00% 000 16 0,12% 000 Total Nonop Expense 6.302 58.12% s1 66 6.717 52 76% $161 Total Expenses ft0,842 10000% $2 e6 ~1,2~75Q 100.00% $3.16 Costs 1000 Gals $2156 $3,16 OF % OF 1?eJ3-94 TOTAL COSTS 1994-95 TOTAL COSTS COSTS COSTS 100.0-GAL COSTS COSTS 1000 GAL Denlon Safes (hIG) 3,814 - 3,1395 Resale Sales (MG) 350 590 Total Sales (MG) 4,165 4,485 Operating Expenses Payroll $2,266 16.71% $054 $2,430 17.30% $0 54 Supplies 533 393% 0.13 549 391% 012 Mamlenance 969 729% 024 1,038 7.39% 023 Services 501 369% 0.12 526 375% 0.12 Insurance and Sundry 33 024% 0.01 34 024x, 001 Production Power 605 446% 0.15 635 4,52% 0,14 Purchased Water 96 071% 002 101 0,72% 0.02 Pixed Assets 1,398 10,3144 0,34 1,539 10,96% 014 Bad Debi 66 050% 0.02 73 0,52% 0,02 Total Operating Expense $6,489 47 85% $1 56 $8,925 49 30% $t 54 repay LT Debt to 000% $000 f0 0.00% $000 Debt Service 2,557 is 86% 0.61 2.437 17435% O S4 net On Inv Trans 1,134 8 37% 027 1,270 9,04% 0 26 Admin Transfers 677 499% 0.16 704 5.01% 016 Flay Roberts Pmts 2,562 1690% 0 62 2,562 IS 24% 0 57 Upper Trinity 125 0.92% 0,03 131 0.93% 0 03 Other 16 0.11% 000 16 0.11% 000 Total Nonop Expense 7,071 5215% ft,70 7,120 5010% $159 i Total Expenses $13,560 10000% $326 $14,045 10000% $313 Costs 1000Ga14 1326 $3,13 33 i A(-' rlIAL R+JUriEr F TIMAIF el1Dr3FT rv Fv FY 1992 1999 1993 1994 1995 1996 19'37 7')9 IN 1V Annual PAID 200 r,16 200 06 290016 201 372 203,436 205,521 207528 209755 j~q VI Ann Swat BiRC A VI 174101 174 101 175.140 176935 176,749 180.581 192 1V vq 1,1111 RiII~Res t 4 64 t 7 00 t 7 00 19 50 22 39 25 05 27 53 10 25 R11? RP yon U 95 4 1neDlrlenfial Foes ? 554 $2,960 12,9 io $3.415 11962 $4,478 14,972 15,520 5 ''nmrnercial Feeq 3 3S3 3 814 1514 4,699 5,452 6,162 6.841 1 596 51nr~ag0uernmental 92 125 125 130 151 170 189 210 7 Indusbwl Water 95 133 13.1 102 lie 133 148 164 M Wholesale 345 280 2B0 269 286 308 330 353 9 Tr,1al Rate Revenue 6 44 7 313 7 31 J B 615 9 971 11252 $12.46 0 $13,84 3 Other Revenues 10 Tap Fees - 7 1 7 7 T 7 7 9 I 1 Line Extensions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 AA m Construction 0 28 28 24 46 26 211 29 19 Prnrata 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 4 Other wastewater 5 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 Misr 0 ri 20 0 0 0 0 0 g a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Total Operating 8 Other 16.452 57,350 $1,370 18,647 110,026 $1t,287 512.511! 113.862 Operating Expenses r6 Fayroll 51,951 12,118 E?.118 $2,224 $2,335 $2,451 $2,574 $2.703 19 Supplies 168 218 218 225 232 239 246 253 20 Maintenance 443 484 494 $08 534 560 SOB 6t8 21 Serv,ces 397 542 541 569 597 627 659 692 Durance 34 16 16 IS 16 17 17 18 andry 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 J 24 Purchased Power 397 390 390 409 430 451 414 498 25 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Fixed Assets 76 238 238 910 1,122 1,076 981 926 21 Bad Debt it 35 35 43 50 56 62 69 28 Ccnt Motor Pool 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 01h?r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Totai Operating Expenses 1112L 14.041 4 044 4 !Lj 55.318 46 5 60 S 719 It Net Operating Revenues $2,933 $3,270 $3,270 $3.709 $4,653 $5,172 $6.878 $8,064 Nonoperagng (Revenues}. Expenses 32 Operating Inl?rest (143) 193) (30) (35) (36) (35) (31) (381 33 Repayment 0 150 150 350 500 500 500 500 14 Debt Service 919 1,481 1,264 1,664 1,613 1,872 1,811 1 981 3S Ret On tnv Trans 839 838 838 969 1,402 1,577 1,692 1123 16 Debt Issuance Expense 0 9 14 10 11 11 13 13 11 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 Othe7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Admin Transfers 461 402 462 542 522 543 565 567 41 Total Ncnop (Revenue) ExF $2.076 $2,667 52,117 $3,461 $4,013 54,461 54,91) 14,866 42 Expenses S,592 6,910 6,761 8,365 9,330 9,940 10,147 10.645 43 Net Income Cash Basis i>4 440 5609 W-1 JA L6 34 2 370 JIM ,14 Nan-Operating Interest 336 125 263 163 194 130 199 117 AS Fxod Assets 76 238 238 910 1,122 1,078 981 926 ,ht'Pr1nclpa1 447 531 426 552 549 109 102 737 rprecratinn 11,441) 11,549) (1,690) (1,947) (24071) (2,172) (2177) (2,370) ,15 Net income FrrllArcruit Pa $237 ,5215) ($154) (}21) =490 $,083 $I 9T5 12,6p6 A9 11ebt Coverage 2 11 1 98 2.04 2 29 2 52 3.05 3 26 3 58 34 WAStEWATER 1 X94 1999 1996 1997 T)98 Of + Population Growth 1 55°. 2 05°. 2 050. 2 059. c~~ 0. 1 Total Annual arlls • ° 1 039. t 02a.. 1 u2°. r D7°. 2 Res Ann Cusl airs u 6090 I D39o I 0~-• 1090• l O2°• 3 Avg Mth Bill/Res 14 719, 14 a2,, I 1 88% 9 901, , y 92 ° Rate Ae_venues $86 $100 $113 $125 313tl 4 Residential Fees 5 Commercial l Fees 1500% 1500% 1200% 100094 10 009. S Inragovemmental 1500, 1500% 12.00% 1000% 10009. 7 Industrial Water 15 00% 1500% 12 00% 10 00% 1 U 00% 8 Wholesale 1500% 1500% 1200% 1 U 009; 1000% 0 00% 600% 6 0090 6 009, 6 00°,. 9 Total Rate Revenue 14 00°: 15 74% 12 BSX 10 929, 10 920, 0 ep rating E>t enses 18 Payroll 19 Supphes 500% 500% 500% 5 009, 5000. 20 Maintenance 300% 3.00% 300% 300% 3 009. 21 Services 500% 5.GO% 500% 5 00% 50010 22 Insurance 500% $00% 500% 5000, 5 00% 23 Sundry 500% 5 00% 5.00% 5 009, 5 0094 24 Purchased Power 5 00% 500% 5 00% 500% 5 009. 25 Other 5 OC96 5.00% 5,00% 5 009. 5 0090 26 Fixed Assets 000% 000% 000% 000016 00006 27 Bad Oebt 28235% 2330% ^410% -a B30,6 -561%, 28 C,OnI. Motor POOI 1 009, 100% 1 00% 1 0090 1 009, 29 Other 000% 0 00% 000% 00006 0 DO% 00091. 0.00% 000% 0 00% 0 00% 30 Total Operating Expenses 21 329E 8.40% 3.07% 2 2691 3 129, 42 Expenses 23 7406 11.52% 862% 2019. 4919. Jk 35 F.ron,phrnt it x 1 noo, 1 • 9 S - 99 Prior OF Need CVP F Y R?gmning Bond; Bonds Bonds Bands IntgI End,ng Endinq 9a1 gnce Sold Available Used Used Earned Balance 1911 t 410 0 1 410 (1,2911 0 161 2.541 1912 2.541 4.500 7,041 541 0 336 6 159 1993 5,156 6.500 12.658 9.253 0 t63 3,566 1994 3,568 0 3.566 0 2874 103 797 1995 797 2,000 2,797 0 1,250 114 1,661 1996 1.661 0 1,661 0 1,499 50 2t1 1997 211 2,500 2.711 0 1,613 119 1,217 1998 1,217 0 1,217 0 1,130 31 124 Net@ FY 1093 804,1mmrq 1I Includsc fncumb9red III WASTEWATER DEBT PAYMENTS IS x tooo) Bond % FY FY FY FY FY FY Sales Int. 1993 199_4_ 1995 1996 1991 1996 Series 83-85 $4,394 Act $446 $412 $378 3224 $200 $167 1986 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1987 2,535 Act 205 204 204 335 322 308 1968 1.000 Act 113 Ica 103 96 94 90 1989 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 1990 1,000 Act 119 115 110 106 101 97 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1992 4.500 Act 381 305 305 415 409 409 1993 6.500 7.0% 0 520 512 504 497 489 1994 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1995 2,000 7 5% 0 0 0 190 187 184 1996 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1997 2500 7.5% 0 0 0 0 0 238 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL $24,430 $1.264 S1,664 51,613 $1,812 $1,611 $1,991 Nole All bonds are programmed to pay 2% principal per year for years 1 - 5 and 6% ainually for the remaining 15 years. All 1993 - t99a bonds are programmed to be sold In March, with the first payment not die tdl the next Fiscal Year (December). a6 I I _I i$x1 ow •a OF %I ON THLY °.OF ti1ON NILY 1991 -92 TOTAL COS r PER 1992 -93 TOTAL LubI PER COSTS COSTS CUSTOMER COSTS COSTS CUSTCMER tAll Customers) )All Cust,;mvr Total Annual Bills 200 536 200 036 Operating Expenses payroll $1,951 ,14 060. $9 73 $2,118 it 160. $10 59 Supplies 168 2931. 084 218 3 22% 1 09 Maintenance 443 7 73% 2 21 484 7 134. 2 42 Services 397 694% 198 542 795'. 211 Insurance and Sundry 35 0 61!. 0 17 19 0 286, 0 09 Purchased Power 397 694% 198 390 5740. 195 Fixed Assets 76 1 33% 0 38 238 3 500. 1 14 Bad Debt 11 018% 0 05 35 0529. 0 18 Cant Motor Pool 29 0,50!,. 0 14 0 0004. 0 GO Total Operating Expense $3.507 61 2590 $11.49 $4,044 59 544: $20 21 Repay LT Debt 0 000011, $000 150 2 21% $0 75 Debt Service 919 1604% 4 58 1.264 1861% 6 32 Rat On Inv Trans 839 14669,9 4 19 838 12 34% 4 19 Admin Transfers 461 605% 2 30 462 7 1040 2 41 Upper Tonity 0 000% 0 00 0 0000" 0 00 Other 0 0 00% 0 00 14 0 20•. 0 01 Total Nonop Expense $2,219 38 759: $11 07 $2.747 40 46% $13 73 Total Expenses W H too 00% IZQ 55 1,6Z21 100 00° 121105 Cost Billing $2855 $3395 OF MONTHLY 9,6 OF MONTHLY 1993-94 TOTAL COSTPER 1994-95 TOTAL COSTPER COSTS. COSTS CUSTOMER COSTS COSTS CUSTOMER (All Customers) (Ali Customer Total Annual Bills 201,372 203,436 operating Expenses Payroll $2,224 26 470. $11 04 $2,335 24 939. $11 46 Supplies 225 2.68% 1,12 232 247% 1 14 Maintenance 506 605416 2 52 534 570% 2 62 Services 569 6.77% 2.83 597 6 38% 2 94 Insurance and Sundry la 021% 0.09 19 02000 009 Purchased Power 409 487% 2.03 430 4 594. 2 11 Fixed Assets 910 10.83% 4 52 1,122 11 98% 5 52 Bad Debt 43 051% 021 50 0 5391 025 Other 0 9-LOX 9.99 0 0 00'. 0 00 Total Operating Expense $4,906 58 39% $24 36 $5,316 56 789: $26 14 Repay LT Debt 350 4 17% $1.74 500 5 349. f2 46 Debt Soivice 1.684 19.60% 8 26 1,613 1722% 7 93 Ret On Inv Trans 969 11 54% 461 1,402 14 974. 6 89 Admin Transfers 502 598% 2,49 522 558% 2 51 Upper Trinity 0 000% 0 00 0 0 001, 0 00 Other 10 012°: 005 11 01200 006 Total Nonop Expense $3,496 41 61 : f17 36 $4,048 43 22% $1990 Total Expenses 11,121 142299- Hill 12AH 1444gl1 14§ 49 Cost Billing $41 72 $4604 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 0451 PRO ECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBEA DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (3 X 1000) 94-0451-01 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/ $1 $0 $1 $0 50 94-0451 E02 (G) OFFICE REMODELING $6 $0 $6 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1994 Clp 7 0 7 0 0 i i I 211 2193 14:53 p9 1i 994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0451-01 PROJ TITLE (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EOUIPMENTIFURNITURE ESTIMAtEOCOST: $1 (x1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT; 13 DESCRIPTION; This project is for mist, office equipment, machines and office furniture for use by Wastewater Administration Division. PURPOSE: To accommodate growing files and improve efficiency through automation. COST CALCULATION: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 N D J F M A ; M ; J 1 1 1 A S ; 1995 0 N D J F M A M J ; J A ; S 1998 O N D F M ; A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL. TOTALIST YR $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 $1 $0 s0 $1 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 s0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 s0 $0 $1 $0 $1 s0 $0 $1 4CUMBE7ANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 4194 $1 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENOUMBERANCE TOTAL s1 COMMENTS: 2124193 10:11 Pn r; s i r a Iyyti _ l~Nt'l IAL Ihlt'hyvtivltlV I N - rtV J t1. I ~4-0401 tU~ PROJ TITLE (G) OFFICE REMODELING , ESTIMATED COST: $6 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION: This project is Ior the office remodeling at City Hall for Utility Administration. f I PURPOSE: To accommodate an anticipated change in office area as a result III of additional space requirements. COST CALCULATION: FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 N D J A M J 6; 6 J A S 1995 0 N 0 A M J 1 A M 11 1996 0 ; N D A M J j ? F M A S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $o E6 E0 s0 E6 TOTAL 2ND YR 30 $0 s0 $0 $0 so a0 $$6 so 0 EO $0 $6 TOTAL 3RD YR EO EO $0 $ S0 O $0 E0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL EO EO EO SO EO $6 E0 E0 $6 S0 E6 E0 $0 E6 EA' ;UMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 4194 S6 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL E6 COMMENTS: 2/24193 10:12 P ~ m a 8 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 0451 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION - TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S X 1000) 95-0451-01 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/ $1 $0 E1 $0 SO TOTALS FOR YEAR -1995 CIP 1 0 1 0 0 1 If 2112/9314:54 P9 - - - L 1995 _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT q 95-0451-01 PROJ TITLE: (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURNITURE ESTIMATED COST: S1 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION: This project Is for misc. office equipment, machines and office furniture for use by Wastewater Administration Divisi,)n. PURPOSE: To accommodate growing files and Improve efficiency through automation. COST CALCULATION: FUNDING AEOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUM13EFIANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP E NC EXP 1945 0 N D J ; F ; M A ; M ; J 1 1 J A S 19913 0 N D ; J ; F ; M ; A M J J A S 1997 0 N D ; J ; F ; M ; A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL. TOTAL IST YR $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 $1 s0 $0 $1 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 SO TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 t0 i0 $0 $0 $0 EO GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 t0 $1 $0 $0 $1 ENCumv4ANCE DATES Encumbered as spent PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 4195 $1 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL S1 COMMENTS: 212419310:19 Po e 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 0451 PROJECTS BONG CURRENT AID-IN NUM8ER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (s x 1000) 96-0451-011 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT! $11 s0 E1 $0 $0 96-0451-02 (0) SERVICE CENTER OFFICE DEVELOPM $20 $0 $20 $0 so i TOTALS FOR YEAR -19% CIP 21 0 21 0 0 ~ I I 2126193 11:50 Pg I I~I I 191 96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0451-01 PROJ TITLE: (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EOUIPMENTIFURNITURE ESTIMATED COST: $1 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION: This project is for misc. off ice equipment, machines and office furniture for use by Wastewater Administration Division, PURPOSE: To accommodate growing files and improve efficiency through automation. COST CALCULATION: FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1988 O N D ; J ; F ; M ; A M ; J 1 1 J A S 1987 0 N 0 J F M A ; M ; J J A S ; 1998 0 N D ; J ; F ; M A M J ; J ; A ; S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 S1 $0 $0 $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 S1 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 s0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 61 $0 s0 $1 ENCUMBcRAN:E DATES Encumbered as spent PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 4196 E1 General Purchase Inspeotfon Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $1 COMMENTS: 2!24/83 10_20 Pg VArIIAL iltilrrn~vtivltill rnv~tvl PROJ TITLE (G) SERVICE CENTER OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $20 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT, 13 DESCRIPTION: This project is for misc. Office equipment, machines and office furniture for use by Wastewater Administration Division at the new Service Center. PURPOSE: To accommodate a move from City Hall to the new Utility Service Center. COST CALCULATION: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS;CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 19% 0 N D 11 J A M F ~ M , J 20 20 J A S 1997 0 N D J A M J F ' J ~ A S ~ S 1998 O N D ; J J F A S S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $20 $0 $0 $20 $0 $20 $0 $0 $20 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so s0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 so s0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $20 $0 $0 $20 $0 $20 $0 $0 $20 E"CUMBERANCE OATES Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase $20 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscelleneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $20 COMMENTS- 2/24/93 10:21 _q F 1997 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 0451 PROJECTS `NUMBER DESCRIPTION BOND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (s x 1000) 97-0451-01 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/ $1 so $1 $o ao TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1997 C1P - 1 p - F 1 0 0 ~ i I It I 2112193 14:55 P i -1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 97-0451-01 PFIOJ TITLE: (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE ~ ESTIMATED COST; $1 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 43 DESCRIPTION: This ProjeC1 is for MISC. office equipment, machines and office furniture for use by Water Administration Division. PURPOSE: To accommodate growing lines and improve efficiency through automation. COST CALCULATION: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Down x two) First Qtr. Second Qtr, Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 0 0 1 1 0 0 O 0 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $1 s0 $0 $1 $0 $1 $0 s0 $1 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 s0 41 s0 s0 $1 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Enoumbwed as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 4107 $3 Genera! Purdum Ingxwd n ConsVuc len Mlsoellaneoua ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $3 COMMENTS: 2/12/9314:19 p r 1998 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 0451 RP TEC S NUMBER BOND CURRENT AID-IN DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER' (S X 1000) 98-0461-01 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/ $1 $0 $O EO TOTALS FOR YEAR -1998 CIP 1 0 } 0 0 i f 2112193 14:68 P 1 199$ ` _DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION 0451 PRQIECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (a x 1000) 98-0451-01 (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/ $1 s0 $1 $o ao TOTALS FOR YEAR -INS CIP 1 0 1 0 0 i 2/12J93 14:56 Pg l i 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0451-01 PROD TITLE: (R) MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE EQUIPMENT/FURNITURE ESTIMATED COST: $1 (r 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION: This project is for misc. office equipment, machines and office furniture for use by Water Administration Division. PURPOSE: To accommodate Wowiry lines and Improve effidency through automation. COST CALCULATION: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES on r3oilars z 100) First Qtr. Second Qtr, Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr, ENC EV ENC E" ENC EV ENC EXP 1998 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CA,$H EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR ;0 $1 so :0 $1 t;0 $1 $0 t- 1 $1 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 $0 i0 $1 so ;1 $0 $0 $1 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Enarrrtbered as spell. PH SE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 4M $1 Gerrard Purchase Inspection Consbuctfon Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL COMMENTS: 2/12J93 14:20 Pg WATER RECLAMATION PLANT DIVISION 1994-1998 CIP Summaries i X 1000) PROJECT BOND CUR AIC OTHER NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REV 94-0470-01 (R) MOBILE EQUIP 77 0 77 0 0 94-0471-02 (T) LIFT STAT SCADA 14 0 14 0 0 91-047(1-03 (N) SAMPLERS 11 0 11 0 0 94-0470-04 (S) BENEF SLDG REUSE PROD 661 661 0 0 0 94-0470-CCS (S) WWTP UPGRADE - 15 MGD 761 781 0 0 0 TOTAL 1644 1442 102 0 0 95-0470.01 MOBILE EQUIP 6 0 5 0 0 95-0470-02 (R) LIFT STAT RENOV 12 0 12 0 0 95-0470-03 (1) LIFT STAT SCADA 10 0 10 0 0 95-0470--04 (R) DIESEL GENERATOR 33 33 0 0 0 TOTAL 60 33 27 0 0 98-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIP 4 0 4 0 0 96-0470-02 LIFT STAT RENOV 20 0 20 0 0 98-0470-03 M LIFT STAT SCADA 10 0 10 0 0 98-0470-04 (1) COY SERV VEH.PARKING 80 80 0 0 0 96-0470-05 (1) TREATMENT PAVED RD 28 26 0 0 0 98-0470-06 (S) LAND PURCHASE 250 250 0 0 0 TOTAL 370 336 34 0 0 97-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIP 62 0 52 0 0 97-0470-02 (R) LIFT STAT RENOV 6 0 6 0 0 97-0470-03 (T) LIFT STAT SCADA 10 0 10 0 0 97-0470-04 (S) BENEF SLDG REUSE PROD 438 438 0 0 0 TOTAL 865 436 67 0 0 98-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIP 2 0 2 0 0 98-0470-02 (R) LIFT STAT RENOV 3 0 3 0 0 98-0470-03 M LIFT STAT SCADA 10 0 10 0 0 98-0470-04 (S) WWfP UPGRADE - 21 MGD 160 160 0 0 0 TOTAL 136 160 16 0 0 GRAND TOTA1 S - 2644 2399 245 0 0 VEHICLES FOR 94-96 CIP MOTOR YEAR ORIGINAL POOL TOTAL MILEC 4YEAE,~l I PURCHASED DESCRIPTION PJR. = IiEP. i FUNDS COST ACTUAL PROD. ACHPS. MAIN TUAL PROJ. SYTDT $L.TDCE 1 1987 1 Ion w/crepe 31,000 3,250 38,750 42,000 30,115 42,161 2174 3044 541 17,684 3lon cap forklift 25,000 25,000 0 25,000 0 0 0 12 yd dump truck 48,800 48,800 0 48,800 0 0 0 0 79,000 77,050 38,750 11 5,000 0 1986 1/2 tun pickup 8,700 1,740 10,875 12,615 49,598 74,397 887 1331 640 5,549 1988 3/4 ton pickup 18,349 1,635 20,436 22,071 $5,828 83,742 8537 12,806 911 6,247 TOTAL 25,049 3 375 31,311 34,886 _ 1996 7007 008814 1989 112 ton util. 12,475 1,247 15,591 16,841 39,919 63,870 5$23 8836 675 10,525 7002 009049 1990 1/2 ton pickup 16,989 1,699 21,236 22,935 24,799 74,397 405 1215 214 911 TOTAL 29,464 2019" 35.830 39,778 1997 7005 030001 1985 2 ton util, truck 745 52,000 0 52,000 23,457 35,186 80 120 201 12,712 TOTAL 745 52,000 0 52,000 1998 7004 009115 1991 1 11 ton util. 18,087 1,808 22,809 24,417 12,773 89,411 585 4095 ~66 496 TOTAL V 18,087 1,808 22,809 24,417 1994 DIVI 'ON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT 0470 PROJECTS - BOND CURRENT AID-IN ~I NUMBER DESCRIPTION _ TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER 1 (5 X 1000) 94-0470-01 (R) MOBILE EOUIPMENT $115 $0 $77 50 538 +94-0470-02 (T) LIFT STATION SCADA $14 $0 S14 $0 SO 94-0470-03 (N)SAMrLERS $6 50 $6 $0 $0 94-0470-01 (S) B NEFICI4L SLUDGE REUSE $661 $661 SO 50 $0 94.0 47^-Cb t6) WWTP UPGRADE - 15 MGD $881 $881 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 1,677 1,542 97 0 38 I ,611019311:22 _ p~ 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0470-01 PROJ TITLE: (R) MOBILE EQUIPMENT ` ESTIMATED COST: $115 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 11 DESCRIPTION: Replacement of rubber tired gas fork lift and #7008 (1 Ton Util, Trk) with super duty 1 Ton Truck 14,000 - 15,000 lbs. Purchase 12yd dump truck, PURPOSE: Upgrading of fleet will reduce maintenance costs & downtime. These vehicle will be over 7 yrs old at time of replacement. New vehicle (dump truck) needed to transport and or dispose of biosolids from belt press to composting operation, Actual Projected Unit Coat Mileage Hra / Yr. COST (N)F Lift $ 25,000 12 1986 CALCULATION: (N) D.Trk $48,000 (R)#7008 $ 3,000 42161 35134 21 1987 Total $77,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES On Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO CXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 19940 ; N D 77 77 J F M A M J J A S 19950 N D J F M A M J J A S 13960 N 0 J F M ; A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AlO OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $77 $0 $38 $115 $0 $77 $38 s0 $115 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $77 $0 $38 $115 $0 $77 $38 $0 $115 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12193 $115 Engineering Design tnspectlon Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $115 COMMENTS: 3117193 11:26 Pg _ 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-Q470-01 PROJ TITLE: (T) LIFT STATION SCADA ESTIMATED COST: $14 (x 1000) ~'>0 GROUP ASSfCNMENT: 3 DESCRIPTION: This project would provide for flow measuring at the Hickory Creek Lift Station, PURPOSE: Provide Information on loading of lift station as well as providing dependable means for pump flow data, COST I Dual-Headed TranspondRrs/Reo . $ 1,000 CALCULATION: 2Flowmeter x$3,500 . $ 7,000 1 Vault 0 $5,000 . $ 5,000 Installation 0 $1,000 - $ 1.000 Total $13,000 FUNDING RECUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 ; N D 14 14 J F M A M J J A S , 1995 O N D J F l M 1996 0 N 0 J A ; M F ; , J J ~ A S S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TGfAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $14 $0 $0 $14 $0 $14 $0 $0 $14 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 TOTAL 380 YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $14 $0 $0 $14 $0 $14 $0 $0 $14 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12193 $14 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $14 1 COMMENTS: 2126/93 18;48 p 1994 CAPITAL IK1PR VO EM ENT PROJECT-__ ~ 94-Q47Q-03 PROJ TITLE; (N) SAMPLERS ESTIMATED COST: S6 (x 1000) OESCRIPTION: This is for purchase of two wastewater GROUPers one AS eIIGNeMENT: t for fl, one for influent) PURPOSE: These samplers would be used t to evaluate the benefits of the automation of the sampling process, They would also be used for quality control checks relating to organic and conventional pollutants. COST !4 CALCULATION: 2 3700 FR Wastewater Samplers @$5,500 . $11,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENT&CASH FLOWS/ENCUMSERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 N A M D 6 6 J F M J J A S 1995 0 N D J ~ F M A I M J J A S 1996 0 N D A M J A M ' S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR s0 $6 $0 $0 $6 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $6 $0 $0 $6 TOTAL 3RD YR s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $6 $0 $0 $6 $e $0 $6 s $ so s0 $u $6 S6 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent. JPHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12/93 $6 If Engineering Design ,lnspectlon (((III'Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $6 (COMMENTS: SJ~ 27!93_9:33 P 9 i 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0470-04 PROJ TITLE; (S) BENEFICIAL SLUDGE REUSE ! ESTIMATED COST; $661 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT 1 DESCRIPTION: This equipment and structure proposed is to compost municipal wastewater sludges. PURPOSE; This equipment will allow process belt filter pressed sludges to meet Class A sludge. Including Independent bulking agent processing. This composting equipment will allow operations during fair and inclement weather. COST CALCULATION; (Itemizatlons 011 next page) FUNDING RECIUIREMENTS;CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 N 0 661 661 J F ; M A M. J J A ; S 1995 0 N D J F M A ; M ; J ; J ; A ; S 1996 0 N D ; J ; F ; M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BON REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $661 s0 $0 $0 S661 $661 $0 $0 $0 $661 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $651 $0 $0 s0 $661 $661 $0 $0 so $661 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12193 $661 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $661 COMMENTS: 212419314:37 Pg I I I _ 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0470006 PPOJ TITLE: (S) WWTP UPGRADE - 15 MGD ' ESTIMATED COST: $881 (x 1000) DESCRIPTION; This project addresses the necessary improvements oto hetGNMENT; I f WWTP required to meet new TWC and EPA Permit requirements and to Expand the capacity to 15 MGD. PURPOSE: To expand the capacity of the WWTP to keep pace with increased flow due to growth and to achieve compliance with more strigent permit required by the TWO and EPA. COST {f CALCULATION: From the January 1992 'Opinion of Potential Cost by Fiscal Year' prepared by APAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 N 0 881 881 J F ; M A M J J A S . 1995 0 N D J F M A M J J A S ; 1996 0 N D J F M A M . J J A S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $881 $0 $0 $0 $881 $881 $0 $0 $0 $881 TOTAL 2N0 YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $881 $0 $0 $0 $881 $881 $0 s0 $0 $881 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT Prelim,Eng 10190 $188 $881 Engineering Design 5/91 $708 Inspection $500 Construction 6192 $9300 Miscellaneous f ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $881 COMMENTS: This Is a multiyear project beginning In 1991 Encumberances; Prior to 1994 $ 7,719,000 Current CIP $ 781,000 Total Project Budget $ 8,60- 00,0- 0 6127/93 10:13 P 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT 0470 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 95-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $35 SO $5 $0 $30 95-0470-02 (R) LIFT STATION RENOVATION $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 95-0470-03 (T) LIFT STATION SCADA $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 95-0470-04 (R) DIESEL GENERATOR $33 $33 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 90 33 27 0 30 I 311719311; 28 Pg a 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0470-01 PROJ TITLE: MOBILE EQUIPMENT I ESTIMATED COST: $35 (x 1000) GROUPASSIGNMFNT: 11 DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Rig #7001 (314 pickup), #7003 112 Ton pickup and used 2 ton util. truck for diesel generator, PURPOSEr Upgrading of fleet will reduce maintenance costs 8 downtime. These vehicles will be over 7 years old at replacement. Replacement Actual Projected Unft Coat Hire I Yr. Mileage COST #7001 $2,000 8537 1989 55,828 97699 CALCULATION: #7003 $3,000 887 1986 49598 66768 Total $6,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS;CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N D 5 5 J F M A M J J A S ; 1996 0 N D J F ; M ; A M J J ; A S 1997 0 N D J F M A M J ; J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $5 $0 $30 $35 $0 $5 $0 $30 $35 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 311 YR $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $5 $0 $30 $35 $0 $5 $0 $30 $35 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12194 $35 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $36 COMMENTS: 3117193 11:27 Pg 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0470-02 PROJ TITLE: (R) LIFT STATION RENOVATION ESTIMATED COST: $12 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 3 DESCRIPTION: Upgrading of lift stations to include fencing, building, roads at Grissom Road and Zimmer (35W) lift stations. i PURPOSE: All weather access to lift stations 3 security while Improving aesthetics, COST Fence 150' 0$10. sm. - $1,676 CALCUTATION: Building 12'X 20'@ $13.00 - $ 3,120 Road 1000 sq.yd, Q$5.001yd . $ 6,000 Lanscapingl .51,600 xeriscaping(ahrubs 0750 x 2 Total $11,195 I FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) j ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N D 12 12 J F M A ; M J A S , 1996 0 N D J F M A ; M J J A S 1997 0 ; N 0 J F M A M J J A ' S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV A10 OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1STYR $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 TOTAL 2NO YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3R0 YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12194 $12 Engineering Design Inspection Construction f Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $12 COMMENTS: 212419310:33 p i _^CAPI~~MpROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0470-03 PROJ TITLE: (T) LIFT STATION SCADA ESTIMATED COST; 910 (x 1000) I DESCRIPTION: This project would provide for flow measuring aGROUP ASSfGNMENT; 3 Londonderry L.S. PURPOSE; Provide Information on loading of lift station as well as providing dependable rr.,3ans for pump flow data. COST CALCULATION: 1 Flowmeter/Recorder 1 Vault/lnafallaUon x 4' $4,000 Fence 25'x 25'(100')@S10.b0'S1 a $4'~ W 91,050 Total ~ ■ 510,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMSERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP END EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N 0 10 10 J A ; , M J J A F S 1994 0 N D A M J J F M J A S ; 1997 0 N D A M J J F M J A ' S • ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $10 $0 $0 91 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 90 ao $10 0 90 90 $10 TOTAL 3RD YR 90 90 $0 $O SO $0 $0 90 90 90 GRAND TOTAL So 910 $0 $0 $0 $0 90 90 so 90 $0 910 $o $10 so $0 $to ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 10/95 910 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $10 COMMENTS: 2124193 16-37 P a ~I 5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95- 0470-04 199 PROJ TITLE. (R) DIESEL GENERATOR ESTIMATED COST; $33 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT; 1 DESCRIPTION; Replace existing 1947 vintage 100 KV diesel generator with 250 Kv diesel generator, PURPOSE: To provide more dependable source of electric power back up during emergency situations, Specifically for remote lift stations to minimize lift statlon sewage over flows during loss of electric power. COST CALCULATION: Stewart and Stevens -Dallas 250 Kv generator $30,800 D.C. International - Ft, Worth 250 Kv generator $32.800 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP END EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1925 0 N D 33 33 J ; F M A M J J A ; S 1998 0 N D J F M ; rill A M J J A S 1997 0 N 0 ; J ; F ; M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1STYR $33 $0 $0 s0 $33 $33 $0 $0 s0 $33 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $33 $0 $0 $0 $33 $33 $0 $0 $0 $33 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12194 $33 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $33 COMMENTS: 2124193 14:43 P 0 WM,W~ X1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT 0470 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (5 X 1000) 96-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $40 $0 $4 $0 $36 96-0470-02 LIFT STATION RENOVATION $20 $0 $20 $0 $0 96-0470-03 (T) LIFT STATION $CAOA 510 $0 $10 $0 $0 96-0470-04 (I) COVERED SERVICE VEHICLE PARKING $80 $60 $0 $0 $0 98-0470-05 (I) TREATMENT PAVED ROAD $26 $28 $0 $0 $0 96-0470-06 (S) LAND PURCHASE $250 $250 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1998 CIP 406 336 34 0 36 ,r 3117193 11;30 Po L 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0470-01 PROD TITLE: MOBILE EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $40 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 11 DESCRIPTION, Replace Rig 07007 (112 T Pickup truck) and Rig 07002 (112 Ton Pickup Truck). I PURPOSE: Upgrading of fleot will reduce malmenance costs and downtime. This vehicle will be 7 yrs old at time of replacement. Replacement Actual Projected COST Unit Cost Hra! Yr. Mileage CALCULATION: 07007 $2,000 6523 1988 39919 55687 #7002 $2,000 4051 1990 24799 86797 Total $4,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1996 O N D 4 4 J F M A M J J A S 1997 0 N 0 J F M ; A M ; J ; J ; A ; S 1998 0 N 0 J F M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $0 $4 $0 $36 $40 $0 $4 $0 $36 $40 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 a0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $4 $0 $36 $40 $0 $4 so $36 $40 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12196 $40 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $40 COMMENTS: 311719311'29 _ Pg I s ; 11996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0470-02 PROJ' TITLE: LIFT STATION RENOVATION ESTIMATED COST: $20 (x 1000) a GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 3 DESCRIPTION: Upgrading of lift stations to include lancing, building, roads and at Vacation and Granda L. S. PURPOSE: All weather road access to lift stations & security while Improving aesthetics COST Roads 2000 Sq.Yd @$5.50 Yd. $11,000 CALCULATION: Fence/Labor 25' x 25' (150) @$I I/ft x 2 $ 3,300 Bldg 12'x 20'@$13 Sq.' a $ 3,120 Landscaping (Shrubs xeriscape) x2 $ 1,500 Total $19,920 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1996 0 N 0 20 20 J; F M ; A ; M J; A ; S 1997 O N D J; F M ' ..i A ; M J J, A S 1998 O N D J; F M ; A ; M ; J ; J; A S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $20 $0 $0 $20 $0 $20 $0 s0 $20 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 SO $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $20 $0 $0 $20 $0 $20 $0 $0 $20 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase $20 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $20 COMMENTS: 212419313:24 p ~i996 CAPITAL I~APROVEMENT PROJECT 96-0470-03 PROD TITLE: (T) LIFT STATION SCADA ESTIMATED COST: $10 (x 1000) GROUP DESCRIPTION: This project would provide for flow measuring a t bsonSL.S. LAMENT: 3 PURPOSE: Provide Information on loading of lift station to provide dependable means for pump flow data. COST 1 Flow meter/Recorder CALCULATION: 1 VaulVLabor x 51000 S 000 Fenre/Labor 25' x 25' (100') @$11' @ 4000 4,000 f,100 Total 511,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1996 0 N D 10 10 J A ; M J ? A M S ; 1997 0 N D J ; A M J J A ; S 1998 0 N D A ; M J F M A S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $110 s0 $0 $10 TOTAL 2ND YR s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $$0 slo 0 $0 $0 s0 af0 TOTAL 3RD YR s0 $0 $G $0 $O $O $0 s0 $0 s0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 s0 $10 $0 s0 $110 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12195 $to Engineering Design Inspection Consiructlon Miscellaneous ENCUMBEPANCE TOTAL $10 COMMENTS: 2/18/93 16:9 P ) t 1996 CAPITALI - - MPROVVEME -E'NIE N--T PROJECT # 996-0470-04 PROJ TITLE: (1) COVERED SERVICE VEHICLE PARKING ESTIMATED COST.. S60 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: t DESCRIPTION: This Project will provide covered parking for division service vehicles. PURPOSE: This will reduce maintenance costs aWdated with weather corrosion and extend life of paint and metal components on vehicles. It will also cut down on time to clear windshields during Inclement weather. 111 yd.(200' x 50'x 31)of concrete @ $3.00/sq.h. COST 200'x 50' Roof (corregated) @$So sq. 30000 CALCULATION: 12 Metal I Beams Metal Tru3s/03.75/Sq.ft' 5.000 Total 25,000 560,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr, ENO EXP ENO EXP 1996 p p 0 0 E0 EXP ENC 60 0 EXP 1997 0 p 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTALIST YR $80 $0 $0 $0 $60 $W $0 $0 $0 $60 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $60 SO SO $0 $60 Ss0 s0 $0 $0 $60 ENCUMBERANCE OATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12198 S80 General Purchase Inspection Construcdon Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL S60 f COMMENTS: J 2/1819316:11 P 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT , # 96-0470-05 PROJ TITLE: (1) TREATMENT PAVED ROAD ESTIMATED COST: $26 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 1 DESCRIPTION: This will provide pavement around the treatment plant. PURPOSE: Provide a complete an weather access route around treatment plant. This will connect existing paved roads to allow complete pass through the plant. 4' x 20' x 300' of Asphalt @ s751ft $22,500 COST 4' x 20' x 300' of Subgrade @ $10/tt $3,000 CALCULATION: Total 525,[00 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1996 10 10 10 10 6 6 0 0 1997 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $26 $0 $0 $0 $26 $26 $0 s0 $0 $26 TOTAL 2ND YA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $26 $0 $0 $0 $26 $26 $0 $0 $0 $26 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 10196 $26 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $26 COMMENTS: 2117193 16:12 P + R C v k r, 11996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0470-06 PROJ TITLE: (S) LAND PURCHASE ESTIMATED COST: $250 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT! 1 DESCRIPTION; Additional purchase of land for sludge disposal. Project is needed to comply with TWC/EPA requirements. PURPOSE: Purchase of additional land to decrease butter zone encroachment and to use for sludge disposal. COST 50 Acres 5,00WA S 250,000 CALCULATION: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS;CASH FLOWSlENCUMBERANCES (1n Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1996 0 N D 250 250 J F M ; A M J J A S 1997 0 N D J F M ; A M J J A S 1998 O N D J F M ; A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $250 $0 $0 $0 $250 $250 $0 $0 $0 $250 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RO YR $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $250 $0 $0 $0 $250 $250 $0 $0 $0 $250 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12106 $250 Engineering Design inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $250 COMMENTS: 2124193 14:9 P ---rte i 1997 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WATER RECLAMATION PLANT 0470 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S X 1000) 97-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $52 $0 $52 $0 $0 97-0470-02 (R) LIFT STATION RENOVATION $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 97-0470-03 (T) LIFT STATION SCADA $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 97-0470-04 (G) BENEFICIAL SLUDGE REUSE $438 $438 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1996 CIP 505 438 87 0 0 212419314:30 P9 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT V # 97-0470-01 PROD TITLE: MOBILE EQUIPMENT ~ ESTIMATED COST: $52 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 11 DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Rig 07005 (2 Ton used diesel generator truck). PURPOSE: U ading of fleet will reduce maintenance costs and downtime. This vehicle will be 12 yrs. old et replacement. Actual Projected Replacement Hrs I Yr Mileage COST Unit cost CALCULATION: #7005 52,000 80 1985 23,457 35,188 Total $52,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr, ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1997 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $52 $0 $0 $52 s0 $52 $0 $0 $52 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $52 $0 $0 $52 $0 $52 $0 $0 $52 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12/98 $62 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $62 COMMENTS: 212419314:2 _ Pg - -P--AL CARITAl. IMPROVEMENT PRGJECT # 97-4470-02 PROJ TITLE: (R) LIFT STATION RENOVATION ESTIMATED COST: $5 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 3 DESCRIPTION: Upgrading of lift stations to Include fencing and landscaping at John Knox and Sent Oaks L.S. PURPOSE: All weather road access to lift stations and security while Improving aesthetics and dependability, COST FencsAAbor 25 x 60' (150')@511.601ft. $1,725 CALCULATION: Landscape 2 @ $760 (shrubs, xeriscape) 11600 Total $4,725 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (in Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr, Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1997 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4'~4 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $5 $0 s0 $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 $6 TOTAL 2NO YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $5 $0 $0 $5 $0 $6 $0 $0 $5 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT } General Purchase 12198 $6 General Puichass Inspection Constriction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL E5 COMMENTS: ?12419314:0 P I 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0470-03 PROJ TITLE: (T) LIFT STATION SCADA ESTIMATED COST: $10 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 3 DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for flow measuring at Granda L.S. I PURPOSE: Provide Information on loading of lift station as well as provide dependable means for pump flow data. 1 Row meter/Recorder x 6,000 6,000 COST 1 Vault/Installation @ 4,000 . 4,000 CALCULATION: FenoeAAbor 25'x 25'(100')(b$11.50' 1,150 Total $10,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $10 s0 $0 $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $10 $0 s0 $10 s0 $10 $0 $0 $10 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12106 $10 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $10 COMMENTS: 2!18193 17:24 P I _ - - r7 C V I 97-0470-L f vv I PROJ TITLE: (G) BENEFICIAL SLUDGE REUSE I ESTIMATED COST; $438 (x 1000) r~ DESCRIPTION: Construct additional covered 35,000 sq-fl, ComGROUP post area, PURPOSE: To provide composting operation to produce class A sludge drying fair Inclement weather. 150' x 250' conceRe pad 0$3.001sq' $113.000 COST 37,500 sq' Pool wlsleel truss/1 Beam structure@$4.753q.ft. $180,000 CALCULATION: 20 concrete piers 2 x 2 z 40 @$5,000 each $100,000 Eng(Destgn, Insp, Survey) $ 45,000 TOTAL 'W8,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 0 ; N ; D 438 ; 438 J F M ; A M J J A S 1998 0 N ; D J ; F A ; M Fd ~,...I j A s 1999 0 N D J F M A M J J A S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $438 30 $0 $0 $438 $438 $0 $0 $0 $438 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $438 $0 $0 $0 $438 $438 $0 $0 $0 $438 ENCUMBERANCE DATES; Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12198 $438 Engineering Design Inspection Consliuctlon Miscallaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $438 I COMMENTS: 2118193 18:33 p t 1998 DIVISION CAPITA!. IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WATER RECLAMATION PLANT 0470 PROJECTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BOND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (1 X 1000) 98-0470-01 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 98-0470-02 (R) LIFT STATION RENOVATION 124 $0 12 10 122 98-0470-03 (T) LIFT STATION SCADA 13 13 10 $0 98-0470-04 (S) WWTP UPGRADE - 21 MGD 110 $ 10 0 $10 1150 1150 10 0 $0 30 ,p TOTALS FOR YEAR -I "S CIP 187 150 15 0 22 i 311719311;47 PQ _ Ivry _ LANI [AL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 98-0470-01 PROJ TITLE: MOBILE EQUIPMENT iJ ESTIMATED COST: $24 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 11 DESCRIPTION; Replacement of 7004 1 112 T Utit Truck, PURPOSE: Upgrading of fleet will reduce maintenance costs and downtime. Replacement Actual Projected COST Unit Cost Mileage Hrs Yr, rALCULATION: 7004 $2,000 12,733 89,411 585 91 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1 D00) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr, Fourth Qtr, ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1998 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 18T YR $0 $2 $0 $22 $24 $0 $2 $0 $22 $24 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $2 $0 $22 $24 $0 $2 $0 $22 $24 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12/98 $24 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $24 COMMENTS: 3117193 11:46 P9 rie P 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0470-02 PROD TITLE: (R) LIFT STATION RENOVATION l ESTIMATED COST: $3 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 11 DESCRIPTION: Beautify lift stations to Include landscaping Border Cowboy and Camping World L.S. PURPOSE: To enhance appearance of lift stations and improve aesthetics. COST Landscape 2 @ $1500 (shrubs, xeriscaping) $3,000 CALCULATION: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCE&CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •4 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $3 s0 $0 $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 19196 $3 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $3 COMMENTS: 9118!9316:39 Pg - a t ,8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0470-03 PROD TITLE: M LIFT STATION SCADA i ESTIMATED COST; $10 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 11 i DESCRIPTION: This project would provide for flow measuring at the Barrows L. S. PURPOSE: Provide hydraulic loading information on lift stations as well as dependable pump flow data. COST 1 FlowmeterlRecorder x 61000 $ 6,000 CALCULATION: 1 Vault @ 4,000 a $ 4,000 Fence/Labor 26' x 25' (100) @ 1,200 $1,200_ Total $10,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 s0 $10 $0 s0 $10 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 s0 $10 $0 $0 $10 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12196 $10 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCLIMBERANCE TOTAL $10 COMMENTS: 2118193 18A1 pp r M t ad-U4 0-04 PROJ TITLE: (S) WWTP UPGRADE- 21 MGD ESTIMATED COST: $9600 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 1 DESCRIPTION: This project addresses the necessary Improvements to the Wastewater Treatment Plant required to meet hydraulic loading Projected by year 2002. PURPOSE: To Initiate preliminary design engineering for 21 MGD Upgrade. , COST CALCULATION: 6.0 MGD x $I.6WGallon. 59,600,000 x 2% n $150,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr, Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 1 1 0 0 0 p 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 p 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 o r.. t ENCUMBIRANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTALIST YR $150 $0 $0 so $150 $150 so $0 $0 $150 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $150 $0 $0 $0 $160 $150 $0 $0 $0 $160 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12Y96 $150 General Purchase Inspection Conmctlon Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $150 COMMENTS: 212419315:$ P i i 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER COLLECTION 0471 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-1N NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER, X 1000) i 94-0471-01 (G) OVERSIZE SEWER LINES $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 94-0471-03 (G) SEWER TAPS $28 $0 $0 $28 $0 94-0471-04 (R) (1994) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 94-0471-05 (R) HICKORY CRK. INTERCEPTOR CREEK $110 $0 $110 $0 $0 94-0471-06 (R) (1994) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES $16 $O $16 $0 $0 94-0471-07 (G) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWERLINES $250 $0 $250 $0 so 94-0471-09 (I) (1994) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR $55 $55 $0 $0 50 94-0471-10 (I) INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $150 $150 $0 $0 SO 94-0471-11 (R) (1994) MANHOLE REHABILITATION $100 $0 $100 $0 $0 94-0471-12 (1) BARROW LIFT STATION $40 $30 $10 $0 $0 94-0471 E06 (R) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES (1993) $205 $0 $205 $0 $0 94-0471E09 (G) COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE-STU $200 $200 $0 $0 $0 94-0471£10 (1) (1993) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR $595 $595 $0 $0 $0 94-0471006 (G) REPLACE SEWER LINE COOPER CREE $90 $0 $90 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR -1994 CIA $1,949 $1,130 $791 $28 $0 i I 1 I i t i 613193 15,17 pq ;i 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1# 94-0471-01 PAOJ TITLE; (G) OVERSIZE SEWER LINES ESTIMATED COST; $135 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 7 DESCRIPTION; increase size of sewer lines over development requirements to provide for growth and increased usage due to changing living standards. PURPOSE: Reduce possibility of replacement or paralleling of sewer lines at City expense. COST CALCULATION: Estimated cost $100,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 N D 25 25 J F M 25 25 A ; M ; J 25 25 J A S 25 25 1995 O N D F ; M A ; M ; J A ; S 1996 0 N 0 J F M A ; M J J ; A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $100 $0 $0 s0 $100 $100 $0 so $0 $100 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT # General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction As Spent $100 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBRANCE TOTAL $100 COMMENTS: 3115/93 1111 p 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #i- 94-0471-03 PROJ TITLE: (G) SEWER TAPS ESTIMATED COST: $28 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 DESCRIPI1ON: Sewer taps for connection of customers to sewer utility system. I PURPOSE: P-ovide the public the services necessary to connect to the sewer system. Plumbers do not typically have the special equipment required. COST j CALCULATION: 34 X $700 e s 23,800 it FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Collars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP j 1994 O N 0 7 7 J F M 7 7 A M ; J 7 7 J A S 7 7 1995 O ; N D J F M A M J J A S C 1998 O N ; D ; J ; F M A M J J A ; S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL f,I TOTAL IST YR $0 $0 t28 $0 $28 $0 $0 $28 $0 $28 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $0 $28 $0 $26 $0 $0 $28 $0 $28 s ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT i General Purchase $28 Engineering Design lnspecllon Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $28 COMMENTS, 81319315:16 _ Pg a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 1994 PROJECT # 94-0471-04 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1994) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET PROGRAM ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 II DESCRIPTION: Replace street lines as necessary where new or rebuilt streets are being Installed. PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance and operational expense of cutting and patching new streets for repair of sewer lines. COST CALCULATION: Design estimate -$10,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (in Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 N 0 J F A M M 10 10 J J A S 1995 0 N 0 J ; F A M M 140 40 J 100 J A S , 1996 0 N ; 0 F A M J M ; ' J A S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TC;AL1ST YR $0 $10 $0 s0 $10 s0 $10 s0 s0 $10 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 TOTAL3RO YR $0 s0 $0 $0 s0 s0 so $0 s0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $150 $0 $0 $150 $0 $150 $0 $0 $150 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 General Purchase Engineering Design 3194 $10 856018503 Inspection 3195 $10 $562 Construction 3195 $130 911419138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $150 COMMENTS: 3115193 13:13 Pg A s 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT H 94-0471-05 PROD TITLE: (R) HICKORY CRK. INTERCEPTOR CREEK CROSSING ESTIMATED COST: $110 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Replace two Interceptor creek crossings: 1. Approx. 1000 FT west of Country Club Rd. at Hickory Creek. 205' of 24 2, Approx, 750 FT west of Country Club Ad, at Hickory Creek . 205' of 24" PURPOSE: To reduce maintenance costs and prevent pipe failure due to poor structural condition of existing creek crossings. COST CALCULATION: Utilities Staff Estimate Design $ 10,000 Construction $90,000 Easement $10,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 N D 10 10 J F M 10 10 A M J 90 36 J A S 0 54 1995 O N D J F M ; A M J ; J ; A ; S ; 1996 O N D J F ; M ; A M J ; J ; A ; S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BONO REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $110 $0 $0 $110 $0 $110 $0 s0 $110 TOTAL 2ND YA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 TOTAL 3RD YA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $110 s0 s0 $110 $0 $110 $0 $0 $110 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 Easement Acquisition 3194 $10 8568 Engineering Design 12/93 $10 856018583 Inspection 6194 $6 8562 Construction 5194 $85 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $110 COMMENTS: 3115!93 13:14 p 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0471-06 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1994) REPL, MISC. SEWERLINES ESTIMATED COST: $186 (x 1000 GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 k DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorating sewer lines, relocate sewer service and increase size where necessary to accommodate load. Gober-Sena to Scripture 6110" 44 LF $60,000 Scripture-Gober to 200' west of Marietta 10110" 32 LF $ 27,000 Marietta-Scripture to Houston Pi. 10110" 39 LF $30,000 Houston PI-Marietta to Bradley 618" 71 LF $54,000 Bradley-Houston PI to 150' S. of Houston PI. 818" t.~ LF $16,000 TOTAL 2,010 $186,000 PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance costs and Improve system Integrity. A portion of existing line goes under a house, COST 1994 Design Estimate a $ 16,000 CALCULATION: 1995 Construction Estimate a 7 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 N D 16 7 J F M ; 9 A M J J A S 1995 0 N 0 85 J F M 170 85 A M J J A S ; 1998 0 N D J F M ; A M J J A S ; I ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL I TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $16 $0 $0 $18 s0 $16 $0 $0 $16 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $170 $0 $0 $170 $0 $170 $0 SO $170 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $186 $0 0 6188 $0 $188 $0 $0 6188 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT # General Purchase Eng. Design City 10193 $16 $58016563 inspection 3195 $12 8582 Construction 3195 $158 9114 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $188 COMMENTS; This Is a muitlyear project be Inning In 1994. Encumberances; rlor to 1994 $ 0 Current CIP MUM Total Project Budget 3115193 1117 Pg r 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0471-07 PROJ TITLE; (G) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWERLINES ESTIMATED COST: $250 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 6 4 DESCRIPTION; To extend sewerlines to committed industrial developments, Actual sites to be determined as proposed. ! PURPOSE: Increased revenue. COST CALCULATION: Estimated Cost =$250.000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP END _XP 1994 0 N D 62 62 J F M 62 62 A i M ; J 63 63 J A S 63 63 1995 0 N D 1 F M A M ; J ; J A ; S 1996 0 N D ; J F ; M ; A M J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $260 s0 $0 $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 $250 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $250 $0 $0 $260 $0 $250 $0 $0 $260 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 General Purchase Englneering Design Inspection Construction As spent $260 911419138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $250 COMMENTS: 2110193 11,36 P 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0471-09 PROJ TITLE: (1) (1994) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR ESTIMATED COST: $615 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 DESCRIPTION: Upgrade the Cooper Creek Interceptor. PURPOSE: To increase capacity of the Interceptor and prevent sewage backup Into the surrounding area. COST Design Estimate $ 55,000 CALCULATION: Construction Estimate $560,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 N D J F M 55 5 A M J 25 J A S 30 1995 0 N D J ; F M ; A M J 560 220 J A S 340 1996 0 N D J F M ; A ; M ; J A ; S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL POND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $55 SO $0 $o $55 $55 $0 $0 $0 $5$ TOTAL 2ND YR $680 $0 $0 $0 $560 $560 $0 $0 $0 $560 TO:,, L 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $615 $0 $0 $0 $615 $615 s0 $0 $0 $615 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 General Purchase Eng. Design City 3194 $55 856016563 Inspection 6195 $40 8562 Construction BIOS $520 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $815 COMMENTS: This is a multlyear project be¢Inning in 1994. Encumberances: rlor to 1994 $ 0 Current CIP $616,000 Total Project Budget $615,000 3/18!93 8:43 P i I, 1994 _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0471-10 PROD TITLE: (1) INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 8 DESCRIPTION: To provide for flow monitoring, smoke testing, comparison of analysis, televising suspected lines and repairs required due to results of studies, To prepare plans and specifications for the repair and rehabilitation of the system to reduce Ill flows. PURPOSE: Reduction In hydraulic overloading at WWTP. Minimize overflows and surcharging of lines, reduce legal liability for backup damage. Reduce the capital expense of relief sewertine construction required to transport VI flows to WWTP and of further WWTP expansion due to Ill. COST CALCULATION: Estimated cost $450,000 FUNDING REDUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSlENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 ; N 0 37 37 J F M 37 37 A M J 38 38 J A S 38 38 1995 0 N D J ; F ; M ; A M J ; J ; A ; S 1998 0 N D J F M ; A M J ; J ; A ; S ENCUMSERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $160 $0 $0 s0 $150 5150 $0 $0 $0 $150 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 80 s0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $150 $0 s0 s0 $160 8150 $0 $0 s0 $160 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous AS SPENT $160 ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL 8160 COMMENTS: 3!15193 13:19 p A' i t L1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 94 04 17 i1 FPROJ TITLE. (R) (1994) MANHOLE REHABILITATION ESTIMATED COST: $100 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT; g DESCRIPTION: Lining or rebuilding of existing manholes. 1 I PURPOSE: Repair existing manholes that are In Poor condition. Reduce VI into, the collection system. I i i COST CALCULATION: Per vendors estimate, I FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 N 25 25 j A M 0 2 5 25 J F M 25 ; 25 A ; 1995 0 N D S 25 25 A M J J F M A S 1996 0 N A M j F 01 1 M A S ENCUMBERANCES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND RCASH EV EXAICDITOTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 TOTAL 2ND YR So $G s0 $0 s0 $100 $0 $0 $100 TOTAL 3RD YA $0 $o $O $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL So $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: $lop $o $0 $100 $o aloo $o $o I $100 PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction Mis;etianeous AS SPENT $100 E CCUMBERANCE TOTAL $100 COMMENTS: 3115/93 13:19 P 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0471-12 PROD TITLE; (1) BARROW LIFT STATION ESTIMATED COST. 3200 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 3 DESCRIPTION: Acquire land, install access road, rehabilitate building and Install drainage Improvements. 1 PURPOSE: Building Is deteriorated. There is no access road. Utilizes Department does not own site. Site floods. COST CALCULATION: Land Acquisition $30,000 Design $10,000 Construction $160,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENFS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 N D 10 5 J F M 5 A M J 30 30 J A S 1995 0 N D J F M 160 80 A M J 80 J A S 1996 0 N p J F M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL I ST YR $30 310 SO $0 $40 $30 $10 $0 $0 $40 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $160 $0 $0 $160 $0 $160 $0 $0 $160 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 30 ;0 30 $0 $0 30 $0 GRAND TOTAL $30 $170 $0 $0 $200 $30 $170 $0 $0 $200 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT 0 Land Acquisition 6194 $30 9001 Design 12/93 $10 8560/8663 Inspection 3195 $10 8562 Construction 3195 $150 9114/9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $200 CCMMENTS: This Is a n uloyear project beginning in 1994. Encumberances: Prior to 1994 E 0 Current CIP $ 40,000 3/15/93t3:20 Total Pro)ect Budget Pa $200,000 a 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ri 94-0471 E06 } PROJ TITLE: (R) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES (1993) ESTIMATED COST; $ 220 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: $ DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorating sewer lines with 12" AND 8". Ave A-Maple to Highland 818' 400 LF $ 30,000 Highland-Ave A to Central 6/12" 300 LF $ 34,000 Maple-Ave A to Ave D 618" 2.060 LF TOTAL 2 7~0 $121168:888 PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance costs and Improve system integrity. COST 1993 Design Estimate -$15.000 CALCULATION: 1994 Construction cost estimate = $205,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 N 0 205 295 J F M A M J J A , 1995 0 N D J F M , A M J J A S 1996 0 N D J F M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $205 $0 $0 $205 $0 $205 $0 $0 $205 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $205 $0 $0 $205 $0 $205 $0 $0 $205 ENCUMBERANCE OATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT General Purchase Eng. Design City 10192 $15 856018563 Inspection 12193 $6 8562 Construction 12193 $199 9114 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $220 COMMENTS: This is a multlyear pproject beginning in 1993. Encumberances: Prior to 1994 $2 5,000 Current C Total Project Budget t 3115193 13:26 Pg z 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # ^4-0471E09 PROJ TITLE: (G) COLLECTION SYSTEM UPGRADE-STUART PHASE II ESTIMATED COST: $380 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 DESCRIPTION: Upgrade Stuart Sewer Line with 151; 2,380' of 10/15" Phase I: Sun Valley - 100 LF south of Manhatten Phase 11: 400 LF North of Selene to Sun Valley PURPOSE: To Increase capacity of the Interceptors and prevent sewage backups into the surrounding area. COST Construction Cost Estimate CALCULATION: Phase 1 $180,000 Phase II $200,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 O N D 200 120 J F M 80 A M J J A S 1995 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 1996 O N D J F M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $200 $0 $0 $0 $200 $200 $0 $0 $0 $200 TOTAL 2ND YA $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRANO TOTAL $200 $0 $0 $0 $200 $200 $0 $0 $0 $200 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 Inspection 10192 $13 8562 Const. Phase 1 10192 $167 9138 Inspection 10193 $ 14 8562 Const. Phase II 10193 $186 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCETOIAL $380 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning in 1993. Encumberances: Prior to 1984 $180,000 Current C'- Total 200 Total Project Budget 3115193 13:28 P T ;1994 APITALIMPROVEMENTPROJECT # 94-0471E10 I PROJ TITLE: (1) (1993) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR (ESTIMATED COST: $650 (x 1000) DESCRIPTION: GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 Corinth Force Main Litt Station to interceptor 8112' I Chisholm Trail Area 5,400 LF $295,000 f Yellowstone Cordova to Stuart 6115' 2,580 LF 5230,000 Kings Row to Monterey NA112" 1,600 LF $126.00 TOTAL 0 9,580 $650,000 PURPOSE: To Increase capacity of tha interceptor and prevent sewage backup into the surrounding area. COST Design Estimate $ 55,000 CALCULATION: Construction Estimate $595,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUM13ERANCES (1n Dollars x LOCO) ENC EXP ENC EXP END EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 N D 270 135 J F A M M 135 J 325 160 J A S 185 1995 0 N , D F M A M J ' A S 1996 0 N D A M J F M ' J ; J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $595 $0 $0 $0 $595 $595 $0 $0 $0 $595 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $O $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $595 $0 $0 $0 $595 $595 $O $0 $0 $595 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT M General Purchase Engineering Design 3/93 $55 8560/8563 Inspection 3194 $40 8562 Construction 3/94 $555 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $650 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning In 1993. Encumberances; Prior to 1994 $ 55,000 Total Project Budget Current CIP $595,000 $650,000 3/15/93 13:33 Pg S 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRp,~ECT ~ _ # 94-047ifl06 PROJ TITLE: (G) REPLACE SEWER LINE COOPER CREEK ESTIMATED COST: $ 270 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: DESCRIPTION: Replace Cooper Creek from Sherman to approximately 10 FT 00 5 west of Nottingham with 3,238' of 15" and 21 f ~ I PURPOSE: Existing line is deteriorated and has been abandoned, Replacement necessary to Increase capacity, COST CALCULATION: 1993 Construction cost estimate $270,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 O N A D 90 90 J M J J F M ; 1995 0 A S N D A M J ; J F M A t 1996 O S ; N D A M J J F. M J t A , S ENCUMBERANCES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR 50 $90 $O TOTAL 2ND YR 30 so 3o $0 0 $o $0 $90 30 0 $0 $0 $90 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $90 $0 $0 $O $0 $o $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL 3p $99 $0 $0 $90 30 a0 $0 0 30 390 $o $0$0 30 $90 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBIECTN General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection 8153 Construction 6193 $15 8562 Miscellaneous $255 9138 ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $270 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear prolect beginning in 1993 EncumberanC88: Prior 10 1994 Total Proj clrBudg tP $18 3/15/93 13:34 P 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY I WASTEWATER i COLLECTION 0471 ? J PROJECTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BOND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER ca x 1000) 95-0471-01 (G) OVERSIZE SEWERLINES 95-0471-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT x100 x100 $0 $0 SO 95-0471-03 (G) SEWER TAPS $36 $0 $15 $21 $0 95-0471-04 (R) (1995) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET $25 $O $0 $25 a0 95-0471-OS (R) HICKORY CRK. INTERCEPTOR CREEK aa75 $0 $10 $0 $0 95-0471-06 (R) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES (1995) $22 $0 $175 $0 $0 95-0471-07 (G) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES $0 $22 $0 $0 95-0471-09 (G) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR 1995 $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 95-0471-10 (I) INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $70 $70 $0 $0 $0 95-0471-11 (R) (1995) MANHOLE REHABILITATION $150 $150 $0 $0 $0 95-0471-i2 (G) CORINTH GRAVITY LINE $100 $0 $100 $0 $0 95-0471F04 (A) (1994) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET $282 $282 $0 $0 $0 95-0471F06 (R) (1994) REPL, MISC. SEWERLINES $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 95-0471F09 (I) (1994) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR $170 $0 $170 $O $0 95-0471F12 (I) BARROW LIFT STATION $560 $560 $0 $0 $0 also $o $160 ao $o TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 C I p $2,250 $1,162 $1,042 $46 $0 L3115193 14:49 P --g 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0471-01 PROJ TITLE: (G) OVERSIZE SEWERLINES ESTIMATED COST: $100 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 7 i DESCRIPTION: Increase size of sewer lines over development requiremenis to provide for growth and Increased usage due to changing living standards. PURPOSE: Reduce possibility of replacement or paralleling of sewer lines at City expense. COST CALCULATION: Estimated cost $100,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1995 O N D 25 25 J F M 25 25 A M J 25 25 J A S 25 25 1996 0 N 0 J F M ; A M J J A S 1997 0 N 0 J F M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction As Spent $100 9138 Miscellaneous i LN BERANCE TOTAL $100 ENTS13:34 Pg i o .a 11995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0471-02 ~PROJ TITLE: MOBILE EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $36 {x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 11 k k DESCRIPTION: Replacement consideration of all factors to date: UNIT # DESCRIPTION MILEAGE HOURS MAIN. COST REPLACE. COST 7177(R) 1986 Ford Backhoe NS 3,457 $ 26,045 $ 36,000 PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance cost and increase reliability for productivity. CALCULATION: Market price FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 O N D 15 J ; F M 15 A M J J A S 1996 0 N 0 J F M ; A ; M J J A S 1997 0 N D J F M A M J J A S. ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $15 s0 $21 $36 $0 Sts $0 $21 $36 TOTAL 2NO YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RO YR $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $15 $0 $21 $36 $0 $15 $0 $21 $36 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 1195 $36 Engineering Design Inspection Construction ,Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $36 COMMENTS: 3115193 15:38 P 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0471-03 I PROJ TITLE: (G) SEWER TAPS VIII ESTIMATED COST: $25 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 DESCRIPTION: Sewer taps for connection of customers to sewer utility system. PURPOSE: Provide the public the services necessary to connect to the sewer system, Plumbers do npt typically have the spectat equipment required. COST CALCULATION: 35X$ 717=$25,095 FUNDING REOUiREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (in Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 O N A M JD 7; 7 J A M 6 6 S 6 g 1996 0 N D A M J F M ; , A g 1997 0 ; N A M J J F M , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $0 $0 $25 $0 $25 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25 $0 $2g TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO GRAND TOTAL $0 $0 $25 $0 $25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $o $25 $o $zs ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction As Spent $25 Miscellaneous I ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $25 COMMENTS: 31819311:15 Pg III 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0471-04 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1995) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET PROGRAM ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) , I GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 OESCRIPTIOW Replace sewerlines in streets as necessary where new or rebuilt streets are being installed. PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance of sewerlines and operational expense of cutting and patching new streets for repair of sewerlines. COST CALCULATION: Design/Construction estimate -$160,000 FUNDING AEOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N D J F M 10 10 A M J J A S 1996 0 N D J F M 140 40 A M J 100 J A S , 1997 0 N D J F M A M A S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 TOTAL 2ND YA $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 $140 s0 $0 $0 $140 TOTAL 3RD YR s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL SO $160 $0 $0 $'.60 $140 $10 $0 $0 $160 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design 1195 $ 10 Inspection 4/95 $10 Construction 4195 $130 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $150 COMMENTS: 2116193 14:58 Pg 1 '1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0471-05 PROJ TITLE: (R) HICKORY CRK. INTERCEPTOR CREEK CROSSING ESTIMATED COST: $175 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Replace three interceptor creek crossings: 1. Approximately 500 LF west of Old Alton Rd, at Hickory Creek. 200' OF 24" 2. Approximately 300 LF south of Hickory Creek Rd. at Hickory Creek. 200' OF 24" 3. Approximatley 1000 LF west of Railroad at Hickory Creek. 200' OF 241 PURPOSE: To reduce maintenance costs and prevent pipe failure due to poor structural condition of existing creek crossings, COST CALCULATION: Utilities Staff estimate Design S 15,000 Construction $145,000 Easement $ 15,000 FUNDING RECIUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1995 O N D 15 15 J F M 15 15 A M J 145 58 J A S 87 1996 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 1997 0 N D J ; F M ; A M J J A S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $175 $0 $0 $175 $0 $175 $0 $0 $175 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $175 $0 $0 $175 $0 $175 $0 $0 $175 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 Easement Acquisition 10194 $15 8566 Engineering Design 10194 $15 856018563 Inspectlon 5/95 $10 8562 Construction 5/95 $135 9138 Miscellaneous I ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $175 COMMENTS: 3115193 13:36 P i 1995 _-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - # 95-0471-06 PROJ TITLE: (R) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES (1995) ESTIMATED COST: $355 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Bell Ave - Sherman to University 1250 LF 618 TWU Golf Course - Woodland South 1325 LF 8112" @ $ 130,000 GlennwocdlRobinwood Easement @ $ 113,000 - Kayewood to Palmwo od 890 LF 618" Archer Trail Easement @ $ 71,000 - Emerson to Alan-A-Dale 500 LF 618" @ S 41,000 PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance cost & increase reliability. COST Design $ 22,000 CALCULATION: Construction $ 333,000 Total $ 355,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMSERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP EMC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1995 0 N D 8 8 J F A M ; J 7; 7 J M 7 7 , A g , 1996 0 N D J F M 333 167( A M J 166 J A S , 1997 0 N D J A M J J F A S g , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL i TOTAL IST YR $0 $22 $0 $0 $22 I TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $22 $0 $O $22 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $033 $0 $0 $333 $0 $333 $0 $0 $333 GRAND TOTAL s0 $355 $0 $$0 so 0 $355 $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $0 $355 $0 $0 $355 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT Design 10/94 $22 8560 & 8563 Inspection 1196 $10 8562 Construct;on 1)96 $323 9114 Miscellaneous f ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $355 COMMENTS: This is a multi year project beingging in 1995 Encumberances: Prior Year $ 0 Current CIP 22 0 0 Total Project Budget 355,000 i 6110193 11:14 Pg 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #95-0471-07 PROJ TITLE: (G) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES ESTIMATED COST: $250 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 6 DESCRIPTION: To extend sewer lines to committed industrial developments. Actual sites to be determined as proposed. PURPOSE: Increased revenue. COST CALCULATION: Estimated cost $250,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTSZASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N D 62 62 J F M 62 62 A M ; J 63 63 J A S 63 63 1996 0 N ; D ; J F ~ M , A ; M J ; J A S 1997 0 N D J F M A M J J ; A ; S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $250 $0 $0 $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 $250 TOTAL2NO YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $250 $O $O $250 50 $250 $0 $0 $250 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECTM General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction As Spent $250 8114/9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $250 COMMENTS: 2/16193 15:49 Pg z; 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 95-0471-09 PROJ TITLE: (G) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR (1995) ESTIMATED COST: $870 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 DESCRIPTION: Upgrade portion of Cooper Creek, Pecan Creek or HickoryCreek Interceptor including lift station and force mains. Site(s) to be Identified as each basins SSES Is completed. PURPOSE: To increase capacity of the interceptor and prevent sewage backup into the surrounding area. COST Design Estimate $ 70,000 CALCULATION: Construction Estimate $800,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 O N D J F M 10 10 A M J 30 30 J A S 30 30 1996 0 N D J ; F ; M ; A M J 800 320 J A S 480 1997 0 ; N 0 J F ; M ; A M J A ; S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL ISTYR $70 $0 $0 $0 $70 $70 $0 $0 $0 $70 TOTAL 2ND YR $800 $0 $0 $0 $800 $800 $0 $0 $0 $800 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 so s0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $870 $0 $0 s0 $870 $870 $0 $0 $0 $870 ENCUMBCRANCE DATES Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Eng. Design City 3/95 $70 Inspection 5/96 $57 Construction 5196 $743 Miscellaneous ENCUM3ERANCE TOTAL $870 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning in 1995. Encumbarances: Prior to 1995 $ 0 Current CIP $870,000 Total Project Budget $870,000 3115/9314,8 Pg 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0471-10 PROJ TITLE: (I) INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 DESCRIPTION: To provide for flaw monitoring, smoke testing, comparison of analysis, televising suspected lines and repairs required due to results of studies. To prepare plans and specifications for the repair and f rehabilitation of the system to reduce 1/1 flows. PURPOSE: Reduction In hydraulic overloading at WWTP, Minimize overflows and surcharging of lines, reduce legal liability for backup damage. Reduce the capital expense of relief sewerline construction required to transport Ill flows to WWTP and of further WWTP expansion due to Ill. COST CALCULATION: Estimated cost $150,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N D 37 37 J A M ; F ; M 37 37 J 36 38 J A S 38 38 1996 0 IN A M J F S ; A g • 1997 ,0 N ; 0 J F M M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL. BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $150 $0 $0 s0 $150 $ISO so TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $150 $0 $p $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150 $150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1 $150 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous AS SPENT $150 ENCUMBERANGETOTAL $150 COMMENTS: 3/1519314:6 Pg fi 1 9 9 5 CA PITALIMPROVEMENTPROJECT # 95-0471-11 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1995) MANHOLE REHABILITATION ESTIMATED COST: $100 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: g I DESCRIPTION: Lining or rebuilding of existing manholes, PURPOSE: Repair existing manholes that are in poor condition. .KIzduce l/l into,the collection system, COST CALCULATION: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ ENCUM8ERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1995 0 N D 25 25 J F A M J 25 25 J ; M 25 25 ' A S 25 25 1996 O N D ; J F t A M J M ' J A S , . 1997 O N ; D J ; F A M J M J A S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV A)C OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous AS SPENT $100 ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL. $100 COMMENTS: 3115193 14:9 P d 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0471-12 2 I' PROJ TITLE: (G) CORINTH GRAVITY LINE ESTIMATED COST: $305 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: q DESCRIPTION: Upgrade gravity line from Shady Shores to Lift Station. 2800 LF of 8"112' R 15". PURPOSE: Present line has inadequate slope and is undersized. COST 1992 Design $ 23,000 CALCULATION: 1995 Construction $282,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS;CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERAN17£S (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP END EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N D 282 181 J ; ' F ; I'M i A ; M ; J 91 J A S 91 1996 0 N D J ~ F A M J ; M ; , J A S , 1997 0 N 0 J F M A M J , J A S ' ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $282 $0 $0 $0 $282 $282 $0 $0 $0 $282 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $282 $0 $0 $0 $282 $282 52 $0 $ 50 0 $0 $282 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT OJBECT0 Design 6/92 $23 956018563 Inspection 10/94 $12 8562 Construction 10/94 $270 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $305 COMMENTS: 3115193 14:9 Pg i 1995 CAPITAL ,,iPROVtMENTPROJECT tf 95-0471F04 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1994) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET PROGRAM ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) f P GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Replace street lines as necessary where new or rebuilt streets are being installed. PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance and operational expense of cutting and patching new streets for repair of sewer lines. COST CALCULATION: Design $ 10,000 Construction $ 140,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) END EXP, ENC EXP END EXP ENC EXP END EXP ENC EXP 1995 0 N D J F M 140 40 A M ; J ; 100 J A S 1996 0 N D J F M A M J J A ; S 11997 0 N D J F M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1STYR $0 $140 $0 s0 $1140 s0 $140 $0 $0 $140 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YH $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $140 $0 s0 $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT # General Purchase Englneoring Design 3194 $ 10 856018563 Inspection 3/95 $ 10 8502 Construction 3195 $130 9114 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $150 COMMENTS: f 3/15/9313:40 pg 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0471 F06 PROJTITLE: (R) (1994) REPL, MISC. SEWERLINES ESTIMATED COST: $186 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorating sewer lines with 8 relocate sewer service and increase size where necessary to accommodate load, Gober-Sena to Scripture 6110" 440 LF $60,000 Scripture-Gober to 200' west of Marietta 10110" 320 LF $27,000 Marietta-Scripture to Houston Pl. 10!10' 390 LF $30,000 Houston PI-Marietta to Bradley 618' 710 LF $54,000 Bradley-Houston PI to 150' S. of Houston PI, 818" 15 LF $1 5.000 TOTAL 2,010 $186,000 PURPOSE; Reduce maintenance costs and improve system Integrity. A portion of existing line goes under a house. COST 1994 Design Estimate =$16,000 CALCULATION: 1995 Construction Estimate a $170,000 ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N D J F M 170 65 A M J 85 J A S 1996 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 1997 0 N D J F M ; A M J J ; A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $170 $0 $0 $170 $0 $170 $0 $0 $170 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $170 50 $0 $170 $0 $170 $0 $0 $170 I ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 General Purchase Eng. Design City 10193 518 856018563 Inspection 3195 $12 8562 Construction 3195 $158 9114 Miscellaneous £NCUMBERANCETOTAL $186 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning in 1994. Encumberancea: Prior to 1994 516,000 Current CIP 70.000 Total Project Budget 186,000 3115193 13:44 Pg 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0471F09 PROJ TITLE: (1) (1994) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR ESTIMATED COST: $615 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 DESCRIPTION upgrade the Cooper Creek Interceptor. I PURPOSE; To Increase capacity of the Interceptor and prevent sewage backup into the surrounding area. COST Design Estimate $ 55,000 CALCULATION: Construction Estimate $560,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANC£S (in Dollars x 1000) ENO £XP ENO EXP ENO £XP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP 1995 O N D J F M A M J 560 220 J A S 340 1996 O N 0 J F M A M J J A S 1997 0 N D J F M A M J J A S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $560 $0 $O $0 $560 $560 $0 $0 $0 $560 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $560 $O $O $0 $560 $560 $0 $0 $0 $560 ENCUMBEHANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 General Purchase Eng. Design City 3194 $65 856018563 Inspection 6195 $55 8562 Construction 5195 $695 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $815 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning in 1994. Encumberances; Prior to 1994 $ 0 Current CIP $61&,000 Total Project Budget $615,000 3115193 14:10 Pg s 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT V # 95-0471F12 f PROJ TITLE: (t) BARROW LIFT STATION _ + ESTiMA'rED COST: $200 (x 1000) J GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 3 DESCRIPTION: Acquire tend, install access road, rehab i:i and install drainage Improvements, tate building PURPOSE: Building is deteriorated. There Is no access road. Utilities Department does not own site. Site floods. COST CALCULATION: Land Acquisition 5301000 Design $10,000 Construction $160,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (in Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N A M D 80 J F 160 80 A S S , 1996 0 N D J A M J J F M A S ~ 1997 0 N D J F A M ~ J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $0 $160 $0 $0 $160 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 380 YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $160 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160 $0 $160 $0 $0 $160 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT# Land Acquisition 6194 $30 9001 Design 12/93 $10 8560/6563 Inspection 3/95 $10 $562 Construction 3/95 $150 911419138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $200 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning In 1994, Encumberances: Prior to 1995 $ 40,000 311519314:10 Total Pro P trBud etP $160,000 ~ _ Pg $200,000 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER COLLECTION 0471 PROJECTS i ;NUMBER DESCRIPTION BOND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S x 1000) 96-0471-01 (G) OVERSIZE SEWERLINES 96-0471-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $199 100 x1$0 $08 0 SO 91 96-0471-03 G 5 $0 $1$0 10 ( )SEWER TAPS $91 ~ 0 $0 96-0471-04 (8)(1996) REPLACE SEWERUNE STREET $10 $ $0 50 $26 $ 0 110 $0 $0 96-04'11-05 (A) (1996) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES $30 $0 $0 96-0471-06 (G) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES $250 $0 $250 $0 $ $30 $0 $0 96-0471-08 (G) (1996) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR 0 96-0471-09 (1) INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $1150 $1550 $0$0 0 $0 $00 $0 96-0471-11 (R) (1996) MANHOLE REHABILITATION S $4 $ 0 20 $1$0 $0 $0 96-0471-12 (G) DENTON WEST FORCE MAIN $22 0 96-0471604 OR(1995 $20 40 50 ) REPIACF S $0 EWE i 96-0471 RLINE STREET $140 $0 S14 606 R 0 $0 ( F SO (1995) EPt, MISC. SEWERLINES $333 $O $333 96-0471G09 (G) (1995) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR $800 $804 ao $00 $0 ao TOTALS FOR YEAFi - 1996 CIP $2,213 $1,125 $971 $26 $91 3118193 8:19 P r; 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT _ 96-0471-01 PROJ TITLE: (G) OVERSIZE SEWER LINES ESTIMATED COST: $100 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 7 DESCRIPTION: Increase Size of sewerlines over development requirements to provide for growth and Increased usage due to changing living standards. PURPOSE: Reduce possibility for replacement of paralleling of sewerfines at City expense. COST CALCULATION: Estimated $100.000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP 5 19% 25 25 25 25 2 E5 25 25 ENC ( 25 25 25 1997 0 0 0 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERAMCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $00 $0 so $0 $100 5,00 s0 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 $O $0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $100 $0 s0 $0 0 0 0 0 0 $100 $1 DO $a so $o $,oo ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE. AMOUNT OBJECT 0 General Purchase General Purchase Inspection Construction As spent $100 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $100 COMMENTS: 3116193 1145 Pg ti 1996 CgPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - -----1-02 ~PROJ TITLE: MOBILE EQUIPMENT J , ESTIMATED COST: $199 (x 1000) DESCRIPTION: Replacement conslderatlon of all }actors to ante: UP ASSIGNMENT: 11 UNIT N DESCRIPTION MILEAGE HOURS MAJNT, COST REPLACE, COST 7124(8) 1965 Flushing TankTrk 97,000 9,268 7177(8) 1988 Ford Backhoe $ 45.061 $ 14 0 60,000 3,749 $30,987 $ 54, ,408 8 roraL S 199,408 PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance cost and Increase reliability to, productivity. COST CALCULATIOi : Market price. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EY.P ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 0 N D A M A M 108 108 S , 1997 0 ; N ~ A D F M { , M A S , 1998 o N ; D J M F ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND AEV AID OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR 60 $108 $0 $91 $199 $0 $108 s0 $91 $199 TOTAL 2ND YA $0 so $0 so $0 $0 30 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $108 $0 591 $199 $0 $108 $0 s91 6199 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase $199 Engineering Design inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $199 COMMENTS: 3/16193 14:43 P 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0471-03 PROJ TITLE: (G) SEWER TAPS i ESTIMATED COST: $26 (x 1000) EVALUATION SCORE: GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 DESCRIPTION: Sewer taps for connection of customers to sewer utility system, PURPOSE: Provide the public the services necessary to connect to the sewer system. Plumbers Jo not typically have the special equipment required. COST CALCULATION: 36 x$ 735 each =$26,460 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1996 0 N 0 6 6 J F M 8 6 A M J 6 6 J A S 8 8 1997 0 N D J F ; M A M ; J J A S 1998 0 N D J F M ; A M J J A S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $O $26 $0 $26 $0 $0 $26 $0 $26 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $O $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 s0 $28 $0 $26 $0 $0 $26 $0 $20 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Englneering Design Inspection Construction As Spent $26 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $26 COMMENTS: 318!9311:21 p 1996 CAPITA-L1 M ROP VEMENT PROJECT # 96-0471-04 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1996) REPLACE SEWERLiNE STREET PROGRAM ESTIMATED COST; $150 (x 1000) GRP S DESCRIPTION: Replace sewerllnes In streets as necessary w ere new Sorl rebuilt streets are being Installed, I" I PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance of sewerllnes and operational expense of cutting and patching new streets for repair of sewerllnes. COST CALCULATION; DesignlConstruction estimate $ 150,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1996 0 N D A M J A M 10 10 1997 0 S ' N ; D A M J ; 100 J A M 140 40, . 1998 O S , N 0 ; ; A M J J F M J A ; S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BONO REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YA $O $10 $0 $0 $10 TOTAL 2NDYA SJ $140 $0 $0 $140 $0 S0 $1140 0 $0 SO $O $10 TOTAL 3AO YR SO $0 $0 E0 $O 5 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL SC 140 $150 $0 $0 $150 $0 S0 S SO SO $150 $0 O $O $150 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design 1198 $10 Inspection Construction X97 $ 10 Miscellaneous 3195 $130 ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $160 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning fn 1996, Encumberances: Prior to 1998 0 II Total ProjectrBudgetP $ 10,000 3115193 13:48 $150,000 1 P W_ J j 4998 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0471-05 PROJ TITLE: A 0996) REPL. MISC, SEWERLINES ESTIMATED COST: $330 (x 1000) EVALUATION SCORE. GROUP ASS!GNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorated sewer lines and Increase system integrity. Lines will be Identified as CIP year approaches. j PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance costs and improve system integrity. COST 1996 Design coat estimate ■ $ 30,000 CALCULATION; 1997 Construction cost estimate ■ $ 300,000 Total ■ $ 330,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMSERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENC EXP FNC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1996 0 N D 15 16 J F M 15 16 A M J J A S 1997 0 N D J F M 300 150 A M J 150 J A S ; 1998 0 N 0 J F M ; A M J J A 5 ENCUMBRANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BONO REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $30 $0 s0 $30 $0 $30 s0 s0 $30 TOTAL 2ND YA $0 $300 $0 $0 $300 $0 $300 $0 $0 $31,10 TOTAL 3RO YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $330 $0 s0 $330 $0 $330 $0 $0 $330 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT# General Purchase Engineering Design 12195 $30 856018563 Inspection 3197 $20 $562 Construction 3197 $280 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBRANCE TOTAL $330 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear pr010.1 belnnning In 1996 Encumberance; Prior Year $ 0 Current CIP $330,000 2125193 18:30 total Project Budget $330,000 P~_ r L 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-•0471-06 PROJ TITLE: (G) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWER LINES ESTIMATED COST; $260 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMEN f: 6 DESCRIPTION; To extend sewer Imes to committed industrial developments. f Actual sites to be determined as proposed. PiJRPOSE: Increased revenue, COST t.ALCULATION: Estimated cost ■ $260,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS;CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1996 0 N 0 62 62 J F M 62 62 A M J 63 63 J A S 63 63 1997 0 N ; D ; J F M r4i A ; IM J J A S 1998 0 N 0 J F ; M A ; M J J A S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $260 $0 $0 $260 $0 $250 $0 $U $250 TOTAL2NO YR $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 s0 $0 s0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $260 $0 $0 $260 $0 $250 $0 $0 $250 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent: PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT # General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction As Spent $250 911419138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $260 COMMENTS: 2126193 16:38 p G 1996 CAPITAL IMPAOVEME1 Rp ` 96-0471-08 PROJ TITLE; (G) (1996) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR ESTIMATED COST; $650 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 DESCRIPTION: Upgrade Portion of Cooper Creek, Pecan Creek or Hickory Creek Interceptor Including lift station and force mains. Site(s) to be Identified as each basins SSES is Completed, PURPOSE; 70 lncr vase capacity of the interceptor and prevent sewage backup Into the surrounding area, COST Design Estimate $ 70,000 CALCULATION; Construction Estimate $600,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENC EXP EMC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1996 O N D A M l J ~ F M 5; 5 J 25 25 J A S 25 25 1997 0 ; N D A M J ~ F M J 595 295 J A S ~ 300 1998 0 N D A M J J A S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV PC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YA $55 $0 $0 $0 $55 TOTAL 2ND YR $595 $0 $0 s0 $595 $55 595 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $55 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 $595 GRAND TOTAL $850 s0 $O $0 $850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850 $0 $0 $O $650 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT 0 General Purchase Eng. Design City 3196 $55 8580/8583 Inspectlon 6/97 $45 Construction 5/97 8582 Miscellaneous $S50 9114 ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $650 [COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning in 1996, Encumberances: Prior to 1995 Current CIP $ 0 Total Project Budget $350,000 3/16193 14.11 $850,000 t 1996 CAPfTAI, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0471-09 PROJ TITLE: (1) INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) 1 GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 8 IIi DESCRIPTION: To provide for flow monitoring, smoke testing, ccmparlson of analysis, televising suspected lines and repairs required due to results of studies. To prepare plans and specifications for the repair and rehabilitation Of the system to reduce Ill flows, PURPOSE: Reduction in hydraulic overloading at WWTP, Minimize overflows and surchargigg of lines, reduce legal liability for backup damage, Reduce the capital expense of relief sewerline conatructlon required to transport Ill flows to WWTP and of further WWTP expansion due to Ill. COST CALCULATION: Estimatedcost $150,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 N D 37 38 J A M J 38 38 J F M 38 38 A ; S 37 37 1995 0 N J F A M J M ' A ; S 1996 0 IN D J A M J F S ; J A 8 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BONO REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $150 $0 $0 SO $160 0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 s0 $0 0 $$160 so $ISO $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 SO GRAND TOTAL $150 $0 $0 $00 5150 $150 $ S0 s0 $0 so 51O SO $ S0 O $1 5150 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous AS SPENT $150 ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $150 COMMENTS: 3!15193 14:50 ri K 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0471-11 PROJ TITLE, (R) (1996) MANHOLE REHABILITATION ESTIMATED COST; $100 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 8 DESCRIPTION: Lining or rebuilding of oxisting manholes, PURPOSE: Repair existing manholes that are In poor condition, Reduce Ill Into, the collection system, COST CALCULATION: FUNDING REOUTAEMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 0 N D 26 26 J F A M J 25 25 J M 25 25 A S 25 25 199) 0 N D J A P M , M J J A S 1998 0 N D J A ; M J F ; h1 ; J A S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 $0 $100 $0 s0 $100 ENCUMBERANCEDATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous AS SPENT $100 ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $100 COMMENTS: 3116193 14:12 Pg t 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0471-12 1 PROJ TITLE: (G) DENTON WEST FORCE MAIN ' ESTIMATED COST: $260 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 DESCRIPTION: Teasley - Ryan to Lillian Miller 5675' o! 61129 I PURPOSE: Existing force main is too small to handle gravity in the area, COST Desfgn $ 20,000 CALCULATION: Construction $240,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (in Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP END EXP 1996 0 ; N D J F M 10 10 A M ; J 10 10 J A S 1997 0 N D 240 120 J F M A M ; J 120 J A S 1998 0 N D F ; M A M ; J ; J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $20 $0 $0 $0 $20 $20 $0 $0 $0 $20 TOTAL 2ND YR $240 $0 s0 s0 $240 $240 $0 $0 $0 $240 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $260 SO $0 $0 $260 $260 s0 s0 $0 $260 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT OJBECTM i Design 6198 $20 956018563 Inspection 10197 $15 8562 Construction 1197 $225 9138 Mlscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL " $284 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning In 1996. Encumberances: Prior to 1993 $ 0 Current CIP $ 20,000 3118!93 8:17 Total Project Budget $260,000 p a 's 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N 96-04711304 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1995) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET PROGRAM ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Replace sewerlines in streets as necessary where new or rebuilt streets are being Installed. i PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance of sewerlines and operational expense of Cutting and patching new streets for repair of sewerlines. COST CALCULATION: DesigrdConstruction estimate -$150.000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 0 N D J F M 140 40 A M J 100 J A S 1997 0 N D ; J ; F ; M ; A ; M J J A S 1998 0 N 0 J F M ; A M J J ; A ; S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTALIST YR $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE. DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design 1195 $10 Inspectlon 4195 $10 Construction 4195 $130 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $150 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning in 1995. Encumberances: Prior to 1995 $10,000 Current CIP $140,000 Total Project Budget $150,000 2125/9318:31 Pg L 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-04711306 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1995) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES ESTIMATED COST; $355 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Bell Ave - Sherman to University 1250 LF 318" @ $ 130,000 TWU Golf Course - Wookland South 1325 LF 8/121 @ $ 113,000 GIennwood)Robin wood Easement - Kayewood to Palmwood 690 LF 618" @ $ 71,000 Archer Trail Easement - Emerson to Alan-A-Dale 500 LF 618' @ $ 41,000 PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance cost 6 Increase reliability, COST Design $ 22,000 CALCULATION: Construction $ 333,000 Total $ 355,000 FUNDING RECUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (ln Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1996 0 N D 166 J F M 333 167 A , M i J A S 1997 0 N D J F M ( >7 A ; M J J A I S 1998 0 N D J F M A M J ; J A ; S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV A(C OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $333 $0 $0 $333 $0 $333 $0 $0 $333 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 s0 so $0 SO $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $333 $0 $0 $333 $0 $333 $0 $0 $333 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 Design 10194 $22 8690& 8563 Inspection 1196 $10 8562 Constructlon 1/96 $323 9114 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $355 COMMENTS: This Ise muitl year project beingging in 1995 Encumbe Current : Prior Year $22000 Total Proect 5 000 Budget 3115193 13:50 p _ 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N^ 96-04711309 PROJ TITLE: (G) (1995) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR ESTIMATED COST: $870 (x 1000) GROUP ASS''SNl1ENT: 4 DESCRIPTION: Upgrade portion of Cooper Creek, Pecan Creek or Hickory Creek Interceptor including fill station and force mains. Site(s) to be identified as each basins SSE$ Is completed. PURPOSE: To Increase capacity of tho Interceptor and Frevent sekige backup into the surrounding area. COST Design Estimate $ 70,000 CALCULATION: Construction Estimate $800,000 FUNDING REQU{REMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 0 N D J F M ; A M J 800 320 J A S 480 1997 O N D J F M ; A M J J A S ; 1998 O N 0 J F M A ; M J J A S ; ENCUMSERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND ASV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $800 $0 $0 $0 $800 $800 s0 $0 $0 $800 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $800 $0 $0 $0 $800 $800 $0 so $0 $800 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Eng. Design City 3185 $70 fff Inspection 5198 $57 Construction 5198 $743 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $870 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning In 1995. Encumberances: Prior to 1998 $ 70,000 Current CIP $870,000 Total Project Budget $870,000 3115193 14:14 P K 1997 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER COLLECTION 0471 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHERI (a x 1000) 97-0471-01 (G) OVERSIZE SEWERLINES $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 J7-0!71-02 MOBILE EQUIPMENT $57 $0 $40 $0 $17 97-0471-03 (G) SEWER TAPS $28 $0 $0 $28 $0 97-0471-04 (R) (1996) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 97-0471-06 (R) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES (1997) $30 $0 $30 $0 $0 97-0471-06 (G) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWERLINES $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 97-0471-07 (G) (1997) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR $50 $50 $0 $0 $0 97-0471-09 (I) INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $150 $150 $0 $0 $0 97-0471-11 (R) (1997) MANHOLE REHABILITATION $100 $0 $100 $0 $0 97-0471HO4 (R) (1996) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 97-0471 HOS (R) (1996) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES $300 $0 $300 $0 $0 97-0471 H08 (0) (1996) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR $595 $595 $0 $0 $0 97-0471 H12 (G) (1996) DENTON WEST FORCE MAIN $240 $240 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1997 CIP $2,050 $1,135 $870 $28 $17 i 3118/93 8:16 P _1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0471-01 PROJ TITLE: (G) OVERSIZE SEWERLINES ESTIMATED COST: $100 (x 1000) 'i GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 7 DESCRIPTION: Increase size of sewerlines over development requirements to provide for growth and Increased usage due to changing living standards. PunPOSE: Reduce possibility for replacement of paralleling of sewerlines at City expense. COST CALCULATION: Estimated $100,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (in Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr, Third Qtr, Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1997 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1909 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL ! TOTAL IST YR $100 $0 s0 $0 $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 General Purchase Gene rat Purchase Inspection Construction As spent $100 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCETOTAL $100 COMMENTS: 3/15!9314:14 Pe 1997 CAPITAt_ IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-Oa71-02 PROJ TITLE: MOBILE EQUIPMENT ell ESTIMATED COST: $57 (x 1000) EVALUATION SCORE: GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 11 DESCRIPTION: Replacement consideration of all factors Iodate: 6123 (R) 1984 Dump Trk 516 yd. upgrade to 12/14 yd. MILAGE HOURS MAINTENANCE Replacement 33,232 11550 26,471 57,128 PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance cost and increase reliability for productivity. COST CALCULATION: Market estimate FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANC£SICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 0 0 40 0 0 40 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ('`t ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $0 $40 $0 $17 $57 $0 640 s0 $17 $57 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $40 $0 $17 $57 $0 $40 $0 $17 $67 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 1197 $57 General Purchase Inspection Construction Wnellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $57 t COMMENTS: 3!1519314:47 P 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0471-03 PROJ TITLE: (G) SEWER TAPS f I ESTIMATED COST: $28 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 DESCRIPTION: Sewer taps for connecting customers to sewer system. PURPOSE: Provide the p, Vic the servk:es necessary to connect to the sewer system.- Plumbers do not typically have the special equipment required. COST CALCULATION: 37 x 754 a 27,898 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1997 6 6 8 8 8 6 8 8 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $0 $O $28 $O $28 $0 $0 $28 $0 $28 TOTAL 2NO YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $0 ;28 $0 $28 i0 $0 $28 $0 $28 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 1197 $28 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $26 COMMENTS: 3!18/93 8:15 p0 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0471-05 PROJ TITLE: (R) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES (1997) ESTIMATED COST: $330 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorated sewerlines and increase system integrity. Lines will be identified as CIP year approaches. PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance costs and improve system Integrity. replacement. COST 1997 Design Estimate $ 30 CALCULATION: 1998 Construction Estimate $300 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCEWCASH EXPENDITURES (in Dollars x 1000) First Qtr, Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1997 15 1s 1s 15 0 0 0 0 1998 0 0 300 150 0 160 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL. BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $30 $0 $0 $30 $0 $30 $0 $0 $30 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 300 0 0 300 0 300 0 0 300 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $330 $0 s0 $330 $0 $330 $0 $0 $330 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design 10198 $30 Inspectlon 1198 $20 Construction 1198 $280 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $330 i COMMENTS: This Is a multiyear project beginning In 1997. Encumberance: Prior year $ 0 Current CIP $330,000 Total Project Budget $330,000 I 2117193 9:41 Pg 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0471-06 PROJ TITLE: (G) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWERLINES i ESTIMATED COST: $2$0 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 6 DESCRIPTION: To extend sewedines to committed developments. Actual sites to be determined as proposed. PURPOSE: Increased revenue. COST CALCULATION: Estimated Coat $250,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (in Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr, Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1997 63 63 63 63 62 62 62 62 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $0 $250 $0 $0 $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 $250 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $r60 $0 $0 $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 $250 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT} General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction As spent $250 911419138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $260 COMMENTS: 2117193 9:41 P k i 1997 CAPITAI IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0471-07 PROJ TITLE: (G) (1997) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR ESTIMATED COST: $700 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 DESCRIPTION: Upgrade portion of Cooper Creek or Pecan Creek or Hickory Creek Interceptor including lift stations and force mains, Site(s) to be Identified as well as each basins SSES is completed. PURPOSE: To Increase capacity of Interceptors and prevent sewage backup into surrounding areas, COST Design EsUmWte -$60.000 CALCULATION: Construction Estimate $650,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr, Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO F.XP ENC EXP ENO E(P ENO EXP 1997 0 0 17 17 17 17 16 16 1998 0 0 650 325 0 325 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $50 s0 $0 s0 $50 $50 s0 $0 s0 $50 TOTAL 2N0 YR 660 0 0 0 650 650 0 0 0 650 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $700 $0 $0 $0 $700 $700 $0 $0 s0 $700 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design 3/97 $60 Inspection 1196 $40 Construction 1196 $660 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $700 COMMENTS: This Is a multiyear project beginning In 1997 Encumberances: Prior to 1997 S 0 Total Project Budget Current CIP ,040 3115193 14:15 P 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0471-09 PROJ TITLE: (1) INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 DESCRIPTION: To provide flow monitoring, smoke testing comparison of analysis, televising suspected lines, and repairs due to results of studies. To prepare specificaWns for the repair and rehabilitation of the system to reduce III flows. PURPOSE: Reduction in hydraulic overloading at WWTP. Minimize overflows and surcharging of lines; reduce legal liability for backup damage. Reduce the captial expense of relief sewerlines construction required to transport III flows to WWTP and of further WWTP expansion due to 111. COST CALCULATION; Estimated Cost $150,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMB£RANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x. 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1997 37 37 38 38 38 38 37 37 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $150 $0 $0 SO $150 50150 $0 $0 0 50150 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $150 $O $0 $0 $150 $150 $0 $0 $0 $150 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous AS SPENT $150 ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $150 COMMENTS: 3115!9314:15 I II 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0471-11 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1S)7) MANHOLE REHABILITATION ESTIMATED COST: $100 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 8 DESCRIPTION: Lining or rebuilding of existing manholes. PURPOSE: Repair existing manholes that are In poor condition. Reduce Ill intor the collection system. COST CALCULATION: Estimated Cost $150,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr, Second Otr. Third Otr. Fourth Otr. ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1997 25 26 26 25 25 25 25 25 1958 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 s0 $100 $0 $0 $100 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design inspection Construction Miscellaneous AS SPENT $100 ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $100 COMMENTS: 3/16193 14:10 Pg 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # ()7-0471H04 PROD TITLE: (R) (1996) REPLACE SEWERLWE STREET PROGRAM ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 I DESCRIPTION: Replace sewedines in street as necessary where new or rebuilt streets are being installed. PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance of sewerlines and operational expense of cutting and patching new streets for repair of sewerlines. COST CALCULATION: DesigrVConstructlon estimate $160,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (in Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 0 0 140 140 0 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 $0 $140 $0 s0 $140 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design 1196 $10 Inspection 3197 $10 Construction 3195 $130 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $140 COMMENTS: This Is a multiyear protect beginning in 1996. Encumberance: Prior year $ 10,000 Current CIP $140,000 Total Project Budget $150,000 31319310:9 P 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0471H05 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1996) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES ESTIMATED COST: $330 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorated sewerIInes and Increase system Integrity. Lines will be identified as CIP year approaches. PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance costs and Improve system Integrity. replacement. COST 1997 Design Estimate $ 30 CALCULATION: 1998 Construction Estimate $300 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr, Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1997 0 0 300 150 0 150 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $300 $0 $0 $300 $0 1300 $0 $0 $300 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $300 $0 $0 $300 $0 $300 $0 $0 $300 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT Design 12195 $30 Inspection 3197 $20 Construction 3197 $280 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $330 COMMENTS: This Is a multiyear project beginning In 1997: Encumberanos: Prior year $ 30.000 Current C I P $300,000 Total Project budget $330,000 1 2117193 10:8 P .J I 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0471H08 4 PROJ TITLE: (G) (1996) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR ESTIMATED COST: $650 (K 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 DESCRIPTION: Upgrade portion of Cooper Creek, Pecan Creek or Hickory Creek Interceptor Including lift station and force mains. Site(s) to be Identified as each basins SSES Is completed. PURPOSE: To increase capacity of the Interceptor and prevent sewage backup Into the surrounding Brea. COST Design Estimate $ 65,000 CALCULATION: Construction Estimate $695,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr, Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 0 0 0 0 +595 295 0 300 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMdERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BONG REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $596 $0 $0 $0 $595 $695 $0 $0 $0 $595 TOTAL 2ND YH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $595 $0 $0 $0 $595 $595 $0 $0 $0 $595 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 Design 3198 $55 Inspection 5197 $45 Construction 5/97 $550 9138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $650 COMMENTS: This lea muttlyear project beginning In 1998. Encumberances: Prior to 1997 $ 55,000 Current CIP $585,000 Total Project Budget $850,000 3/1519314:17 P9 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0471 H12 PROJ TITLE: (G) (1996) DENTON WEST FORCE MAIN r"a ESTIMATED COST: $260 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 DESCRIPTION: Teasley -Ryan to Lillian Miller 5,675' of 12" I PURPOSE: Cxisting force maln Is too small to handle growth in the area. COST Design $ 20,000 CALCULATION: Construction $240,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr, Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr, ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 0 0 240 120 0 120 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $240 $0 s0 $0 $240 $240 $0 $0 s0 $240 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $240 $0 s0 $0 $240 $240 $0 $0 $0 $240 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 Design 1196 $20 Inspection 1197 $15 Construction 1197 $225 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCEIOTAL $220 COMMENTS: Thhs Is a muhlyear pro)eot be'nning in 1997. Encumberances: Prior to 197 $ 24,000 Current CIP $ 20,000 Total Project Budget $220,000 3115193 14:17 P Y1998 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER j COLLECTION 0471 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER X 1000) 98-0471-01 (G) OVERSIZE SEWERLINES $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 98-0471-03 (G) SEWER TAPS $29 $0 $0 $29 $0 98-0471-04 (R) (1998) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 98-0471-05 (P) (4998) REPL, MISC. SEWERLINES $30 $0 $30 $0 $0 98-0471-06 (G) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWERLINES $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 98-0471-07 (G) (1998) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR $60 $60 $0 $0 $0 98-0471-09 (I) INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION $150 $150 $0 $0 50 98-0471-11 (R) (1998) MANHOLE REHABILITATION $100 $0 $100 $0 $0 98-0471104 (P) (1997) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 98-0471105 (R, (1997) REPL, MISC. SEWERLINES $300 $0 $300 $0 $0 98-0471107 (G+ (1997) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR $650 $650 $0 $0 SO TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1998 C1P $1,819 $900 $830 $29 $0 I 3115193 14,52 PQ k 1998 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0471-01 PROJ TITLE: (G) OVERSIZE SEWERLINES ESTIMATED COST: $100 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 7 I i DESCRIPTION: Increase size of sewerlines over development requirements to provide for growth and increased usage due to changing living standards. PURPOSE: Reduce possibility for replacement of paralleling of sewerlines at City expense. COST CALCULATION: Estimated $100,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1998 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 $100 s0 $0 $0 $100 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $100 $0 $0 s0 $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT0 General Purchase General Purchase Inspection Construction As spent $100 9138 Mlsoellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $100 COMMENTS: 3!15193 14:18 P t 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0471-03 n. , PROJ TITLE: (G) SEWER TAPS ESTIMATED COST: $29 (x 1000) ^ GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 I DESCRIPTION: Sewer laps for connecting customers to sewer system. PURPOSE: Provide the public the services necessary to connect to the sewer system,- Plumbers do not typically have the special equipment required COST CALCULATION: 38 @ 776 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr, Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr, ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMSERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV NO OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YA $0 s0 $29 $0 $29 $0 $0 $29 $0 $29 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $0 $29 $0 $29 $0 $0 $29 $0 $29 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase $29 General Purchase Inspection ConstrucUon Miscellaneous ENCIUMBERANCE TOTAL $29 COMMENTS: 3110193 16:13 Pg i t 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT -#-'98-0471-04 I PROJ TITLE: (R) (1998) REPLACE SEWERLINE STREET PROGRAM ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 ` DESCRIPTION: Replace sewerlines In streets as necessary where new or rebuilt streets are being Installed. PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance of sewerlines and operational expense of cutting and patching new streets for repair of sewerlines. . COST CALCULATION: Design/Construction estimate $150,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO FXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 140 70 0 70 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 140 0 0 140 0 140 0 0 140 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $160 $0 $0 $150 s0 $160 $0 s0 $150 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design 1197 $10 Inspection 1198 $10 Construction 1/98 $130 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $160 COMMENTS: This is it multiyear protect beginning In 1948 Enaumberance: Prior Year $ 0 Current CIP $150,000 Total Protect Budget $150,000 311 6193 14:1 Pg 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0471-05 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1998) REPL. MISC. SEWERLINES ESTIMATED COST: $330 (x 1000) r GROUP kSSIGNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorated sewerlines and Increase system Integrity. Lines will be Identified as CIP year approaches. PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance costs and Improve system Integrity. replacement. COST 1997 Design E'atimate $ 30 CALCULATION: 1998 Construction Estimate $300 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr, Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr, ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1998 15 15 is 15 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 300 150 0 150 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES SONG REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $30 $0 s0 $30 $0 $30 $0 $0 $30 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 300 0 0 300 0 300 0 0 300 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $330 $0 $0 $330 s0 $330 $0 $0 $330 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design 101" $30 Inspection 1198 $20 Construction 1198 $280 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $330 COMMENTS: This Is a multiyear project beginning in 1998. Encumberance: Prior year $ 0 Current CIP $330,000 6 Total Project Budget $330,000 2117193 10:34 P k y F 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0471-06 PROJ TITLE: (G) DEVELOPMENT PLAN SEWERLINES ESTIMATED COST: $250 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 6 DESCRIPTION: To extend seweriines to committed developments. Actual sites to be determined as proposed. PURPOSE: Increased revenue. COST CALCULATION: Estimated Cost $250.000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (in Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 63 63 63 63 62 62 62 62 1999 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIO OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $250 $0 $0 $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 $250 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $260 $0 $0 $250 $0 $250 $0 $0 $250 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. Ar PHASE DATE AMOUNT OBJECT General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction Ac spent $250 911419138 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $260 COMMENTS: 2/17103 10:38 Pg 3 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98 0471 07 PAOJ TITLE: (G) (1998) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR ESTIMATED COST $750 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: q DESCRIPTION: Upgrade portion of Cooper Creek or Pecan Creek or Hickory Creek Interceptor Including lift stations and force mains. Site(s) to be identifled as well as each basins SSES is completed. PURPOSE: To Increase capacity of intorceptors and prevent sewage backup Into surrounding areas, COST Design Estimate W$60.000 CALCULATION: Construction Estimate -$690,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANQESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 0 1998 0 0 690 345 0 345 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . ,1 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $80 s0 $0 $0 $80 $80 SO $0 $0 $60 TOTAL 2ND YR 890 0 0 0 690 890 0 0 0 690 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $780 $0 $0 $0 $750 $750 $0 $0 $0 $750 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT Design 10!97 $60 Inspection 1197 $40 Construction 1!99 $650 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $780 COMMENTS; This Is a muldyear project beginnin In 1998 QQQ Encumberances; Prior p US Total Project Budget Current C CIP IA 3/16193 14;19 p i a 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 58-0471-09 PROJ TITLE: (1) INFILTRATION INFLOW CORRECTION ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: a DESCRIPTION To provide flow monitoring, smoke testing comparison of analysis, teieAsing suspected lines, and repairs due to results of studies. To prepare specifications for the repair and rehabilitation of the system to reduce Vs flows. PURPOSE: Reduction In hydraulic overloading at WWTP. Minimize overflows and surcharging of lines; reduce legal liability for backup damage. Reduce the captial expense of relief sewerlines construction required to transport VI flows to WWTP and of fuller WWTP expansion due te) 111. COST CALCULAP.ON: Estimated Cost $150,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr, Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1998 37 37 38 38 38 38 37 37 1999 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EYPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $160 $0 $0 s0 $160 $150 $0 $0 $0 $160 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $150 $0 $0 $0 $160 $15'1 $0 $0 $0 $150 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design inspection Construction Miscellaneous AS SPENT $160 ENCUMBERANGd TOTAL $150 COMMENTS: 3115193 14:20 P it L1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0471-11 PR0.i TITLE: (R) (1998) MANHOLE REHABILITATION i ESTIMATED COST: $100 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT; 9 i DESCRIPTION: Lining or rebuilding of existing manholes, PURPOSE: Repair existing manholes that are In poor condition. Reduce VI intarthe collection system. COST CALCULATION: Estimated Cost $150,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Do{tars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IEtT YR $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 $0 $100 $0 $0 $100 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $100 s0 $0 $100 $0 $100 $0 s0 $100 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous AS SPENT $100 ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $100 COMMENTS: 3115!9314:21 p 'S 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0471104 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1997) REPLACE SSWERLINE STREET PROGRAM I ESTIMATED COST: $150 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 f DESCRIPTION: Replace sewerlines In streets as necessary where new or rebuilt streets are being Installed. J f PURPOSE: Reduce malmenance of sewerlines and operational expense of cutting and patching new streets for repair of sewerlines, COST CALCULATION: 09&WConstrucdon estimate $150,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBE•",ANCEWCASH EXPENDITURES (fn Dollars x 1000) First Qtr, Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr, ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1998 0 0 140 70 0 70 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ef;CUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 $0 $140 $0 $0 $140 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design 1197 $10 Inspection 1198 $10 Construction 1199 $130 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $160 COMMENTS: This is a multlyear project beginning in 1997 Encumberarloe, Prior Year $10,000 Current CIP $140,000 Total Project Budget $160,000 3115193 14:2 Pg 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT q 98-0471105 PROJ TITLE: (R) (1997) REPL. MISC. SEWcRLINES ESTIMATED COST: $330 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 5 DESCRIPTION: Replace deteriorated sewerlines and Increase system Integrity. I Lines will be identified as CIP year approaches. PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance costs and improve system integrity. replacement. COST 1997 Design dstimate $ 30 CALCULATION: 1998 Construction Estimate $300 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENG EXP 1998 0 0 300 150 0 150 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC CTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $ri =300 $0 $0 $300 $0 $300 $0 $0 $300 TOTAL 2ND Yrl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RU Y4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $300 $0 $0 $300 $0 $300 $0 $0 $300 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design 10!96 $30 Inspection 1196 $20 Construction 1196 $280 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $330 COMMENTS: This Is a multiyear project beginning In 1007, Encumberance: Prior year $ 30,000 Current CIP $300,000 Total Project Budget $330.000 2/117193 16:13 Pg w~ i k 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0471107 J PROJ TITLE: (G) (1997) UPGRADE INTERCEPTOR ESTIMATED COST: $700 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 4 ! i DESCRIPTION: Upgrade portion of Cooper Creek or Pecan Creek or Hickory Creek Interceptor Including lift stations and force mains. Site(s) to be identified as well as each basins SSES is completed. PURPOSE: To increase rapacity of intercepters and prevent sewage backup into surrounding areas, COST Design Estimate W$50,000 CALCULATION: Construction Estimate -$650,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr, Second Qtr. Third Qtr, Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 11A8 0 0 650 325 0 325 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV A1C OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $650 $0 $0 $0 $650 $650 $0 $0 $0 $650 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $650 $0 $0 s0 $650 $650 $0 $0 $0 $650 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase Engineering Design 3197 $50 inspection 1198 $40 Construction 1198 $610 Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $700 COMMENTS: This is a multiyear project beginning In 1997 Encumberances: Prior to 1998 $ 60,000 Current CIP 1690, Total Project Budget $700.000 3115193 14:22 Pg 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ENGINEERING 0472 7 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER x 1000) 94-0472-01 (S) FIELD EOUIPMENT $3 $0 $3 $0 SO 94-0472-02 (R) OFFICE FOUIPMENT 8. FURNITURE $1 $0 $1 $O SO TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 4 0 ~4 0 0 i 8110193 11! 28 139 i 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT P80JECT # 94-0472-01 PROJ TITLE: (S) FIELD EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST; $3 (x 1000) ERR GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 DESCRIPTION: Special Equipment PURPOSE: Provides equipment necessary for field technicians to carry out assigned tasks. I COST CALCULATION: Per vendor quotes - estimated FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) END EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 N D J F M 3; 3 A M ; J J A S 1995 O N D J F M A M J A ; S 1996 0 N 0 J F M ; A M J J ; A ; S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL ISTYR $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 SO $3 $0 $0 $3 TOTAL 21140 YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 E3 SO $0 $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT Generai Purchase 3/94 $3 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $3 COMMENTS: l 3115193 14:39 Pa x x i 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0472-02 PROJ TITLE: (R) OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE ESTIMATED COST: $1 (x 1000) $9 i GROUP ASSIGNMENT. 13 DESCRIPTION: Fife cabinets. flat files, tables, chairs, etc. PURPOSE: Necessary for operations. COST CALCULATION: Estimated I I I FUNDING REQUIREMENTS,CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 N D J F M 1 1 A M J J A S 1995 O N D J F M A M J J A S 1996 0 N D ; J F M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL ISTYR $0 $1 0 $0 Si $0 Si $0 0 1 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 t0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 10 10 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 IQ 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 3i $0 $0 $1 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE WE AMOUNT General Purchase 3194 $1 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $1 COMMENTS: I 2/11193 8 20 Pg i j44- DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ENGINEERING 0472 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER i (S X 1000) 95-0472-01 (S) FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 95-0472-02 (R) OFFIC_ EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 95-0472-03 (R) MOBILE EQUIPMENT $1;1 $0 $19 $0 SO i TOTALS FOR YEAR -1995 CIP 21 0 21 0 0 I 3115193 1619 Pg N 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0472-01 F J TITLE: (S) FIELD EQUIPMENT IMATED COST: $t (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 DESCRIPTION: Special Equipment PURPOSE: Provides equipment necessary for field technicians to carry out assigned tasks. i COST CALCULATION: Per vendor quotes -estimated FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (in Dotlars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1995 0 N D J F M 1 1 A M J J A S 1996 0 N D J F M A ; M J J A S 1 1997 0 ; N D J F M A M J J A S I ENCUMSERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL ISTYR $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 $1 s0 $0 $1 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 $t $0 $0 $1 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 3195 $1 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous h ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $1 COMMENTS: i 1 9J151a9 14,4n p a, i 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 95-0472-02 PROJ TITLE: (R) OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE ESTIMATED COST: $1 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT, 13 DESCRIPTION: File cabinets, flat files, tables, chairs, etc. PURPOSE; Necessary for operations. Ii COST CALCULATION: Estimated FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1995 0 N 0 J F M 1 1 A M J J A S 1996 0 N 0 J F M A M J J A S 1997 0 N 0 J ; F M A M J ; J A S ENCUI!BERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES l BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YA $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 as $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 3195 $1 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $1 COMMENTS: 2/1193 16:6 Pg 199_ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0472-03 PROJ TITLE: (R) MOBILE EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $19 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 11 DESCRIPTION: Replacement consideration of all factors to date, Unit 0 Description Milage Maintenance Cost Replacement Cost 5002 1986GMC1T 41,600 $5,205 $19,000 PURPOSE: Reduce maintenance cost and increase reliability for productivity, COST CALCULATION: Market price. I FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N D J F M 19 19 A M J J A S , 1996 0 N D J F M A M J J ; , f A S , 1997 0 N D J F M II A M J ; J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $19 $0 $0 $19 $0 $19 $0 $0 $19 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Sa $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $19 $0 $0 519 $0 $19 $0 $0 $19 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 3196 $19 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $19 COMMENTS: 2123193 12:4 p 1966 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY - WASTEWATER ENGINEERING 0472 FM BOND CURRENT AID-tN TION - TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S x 1000) i 96-0472-01 (S) FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0 96-0472-02 (R) OFFICE EQUIPMENTS. FURNITURE $1 $O $1$1 S1 $ s 1 0 $0 0 50 I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP 2 ti 2 0 0 t I~ 3/1519316:29 P9 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0472-01 PROJ TITLE: (S) FIELD EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $1 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 DESCRIPTION: Special Equipment PURPOSE: Provides equipment necessary for field technicians to carry out assigned tasks. COST CALCULATION: Per vendor quotes -estimated i I I I FUNDING AEOUTAEMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCU M BERANC ES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP I 1996 O N D J F M 1 I A M J J A S 1997 0 N D J = M A M J J ; A S I 1998 O N Q J F M ; A M J J A S i I ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1STYA $0 $1 t0 $0 $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 SI TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $0 s0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 to $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 s1 $0 s0 $1 I ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 3196 $1 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $1 COMMENTS: i 311 5193 1 4:40 PA 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT All 96-0472-02 PROJ TITLE: (R) OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE ESTIMATED COST: $1 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION: File cabinets, flat files, tables, chairs, etc. PURPOSE: Necessary for operations, COST CALCULATION: Estimated I FUNDING R EQU I REM ENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCLIMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1996 0 N D J F M 1 1 A M J J A S I 199; 0 ; N ; D J F ; M A M J J A S , 1996 0 ; N ; D ; J F M ; A M J J ; A ; S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES IJ BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $O $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 TOTAL 2ND YR $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 TOTAL 3RO YR $0 $0 $O $0 $O $0 $0 $0 $O $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 $0 $O $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 3196 $1 Engineering Dosign Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL COMMENTS: 211/93 16:19 PQ s 1997 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER ENGINEERING 0472 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT Ai0-IN iNUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (5 X 1000) 97-0472-01 (S) FIELD EQUIPMENT $1 $0 $1 $0 SO 97-0472-02 (R) OFFICE EQUIPMENT 3 FURNITURE $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 i TOTALS FOR YEAR -1997 GIP 2 0 2 0 0 1 i i I i i I' 3115193 16:30 Pq i 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0472-01 - PROJ TITLE: (S) FIELD EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $1 {x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 DESCRIPTION: Special Equipment PURPOSE: Provide equent necessary for field technicians to carry out assign tasks. COST CALCULATION: Per vendor quotes FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr, ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1997 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBEAANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL ISTYR $0 $1 s0 $0 $1 $0 $1 $0 s0 $1 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 so $0 $1 $0 $1 $0 s0 $1 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Ervcumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase IN913 sl General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUWMNCE TOTAL ai ' COMMENTS: 311 &'9314:41 Pg f II ?SS7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 97-0472-02 j PROD TITLE: OFFICE EQUIPMENT b FURNITURE ESTIMATED COST: 31 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT; 13 DESCRIPTION: Fife cabinets, flat files, tables, chairs, etc. PURPOSE: Necessary for operations. COST CALCULATION: Estimated cost -$1.000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCIES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr, Third Qtr. ENC EXP ENO EXP Fourth Qtr, 1997 1 11, 0 0 ENO EXP ENC EXP 1998 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 . , I ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $t i0 $0 $1 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 $O 0 $1 $1 :0 :0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 $0 s0 $1 0 0 0 0 0 :0 $1 :0 4 $1 ENCUMBERANC£ DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 10/" s1 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL S1 COMMENTS: 2/1193 16:22 P I I 1998 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY € WASTEWATER ENGINEERING 0472 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN [NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S x 1000) 98-0472-01 (S) FIELD EQUIPMENT E1 $0 $1 $0 $0 99-0472-02 (R) OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 98-0472-03 (R) SEWER VIDEO CAMERA $22 $0 $22 $0 30 i I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1997 CIP V 24 0 24 0 0 3115193 16'30 P a y 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0472-01 PROD TITLE: (S) FIELD EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST; $1 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 9 DESCRIPTION: Special Equipment PURPOSE: Provide equipment necessary for field technicians to carry out asslgnedptasks. I COST CALCULATION: Per vendor quotes FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH WENDITURES BOND RFV A1C OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YA $0 $t $0 $0 $1 so $1 $0 $0 $1 i TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 s0 $0 $1 s0 $1 $0 $0 $1 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12197 $1 General Purchase Insmection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $1 4 COMMENTS: f 3115193 14:41 P9 • u t 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0472-02 PROJ TITLE; (R) OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE ESTIMATED COST: $1 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION: Fite cabinets, flat files, tables, chairs, etc, PURPOSE: Necessary for operations. COST CALCULATION: Estimated coat 0$1,000 j FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 19% 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 E ENCUMBRANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 TOTAL 2ND YA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 $0 s0 $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12197 $1 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $1 COMMENTS: 211193 16:35 P - 6 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0472-03 PROJ TITLE; (R) SEWER VIDEO CAMERA ESTIMATED COST: $22 (K 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 14 DESCRIPTION: New swivel head video camera. PURPOSE: Replace existin camera which will reduce maintenance cost and downtime. Swivel head camera will Increase stridency of cameraing operation. COST CALCULATION: Per vendor quotes, FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr, f ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 0 0 22 22 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j 1 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL 'TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $22 $0 $O $22 s0 $22 $0 $O $22 TOTAL 2ND YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3RD YR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL SO $22 $0 $O $22 s0 $22 $0 $0 $22 i ENCUMBERANCE DATES Encumbered as spent. PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 3190 $22 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $22 ` COMMENTS: 3/16193 14:42 Pg _l e a 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER LABORATORY 0481 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER! 13 x 1000) I 94-0481-01 (T) MAINTENANCE BUILDING RENOVATIO $5 $0 $5 $0 SO 94-0481-02 (S) SAMPLE RE CEIVING AREA $15 30 $15 SO $0 94-0481-03 (S) METTLER BALANCE $4 30 $4 $0 $0 94-0481-04 (R) MICROPROCESSOR $3 $0 $3 SO SO 94-0481-05 (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 94-0461-06 (R) GAS CHROMATOGRAPH $25 $25 30 $0 $0 94-0481-07 (S) WATERSHED MONITORING $4 SO $4 $0 30 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 60 25 35 0 0 I I ~ I i i I I 1 I l 5r27r93 14 10 Pg 4 pyy 1 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0481-01 PROJ TITLE. IT) MAINTENANCE BUILDING RENOVATIONS ESTIMATED COST: $5 (x 1000) GROUP MET: DESCRIPTION; This protect will provide funds for renovations to was ewaterJtreatment 10 maintenance building. PURPOSE: The division will use this building for storage and office space. Environmental Services and Water Reclamation are swapping storage buildings. COST CALCULATION: Roof Repair $2,500 Interior renovations 32.500 $5.000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 19940 N D 5 51 F M A M • J A S I 1995 0 N 0 J ~ F ~ M A M J J A S , 1996 0 N D A J ~ F ~ M M J A I S j ENCUMBERANCE'S CASH EXPENDITURES I BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL I TOTAL 1STYR $0 $5 $0 $0 $5 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5 $0 $0 $5 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $6 $0 $0 $5 $0 $0 $ $ $5 $0 0 $0 $0 $O $O $5 ENCUM13ERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT ' General Purchase 1194 $5 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaceous j ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $5 COMMENTS: 5127/93950 Pg --P r. 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0481-02 PROD TITLE: (S) SAMPLE RECEIVING AREA ESTIMATED COST: $15 (x 1000) DESCRIPTION: This ProJeCt will allow for the construction of a sample rrecleivi g and storage ' area for incoming samples. I PURPOSE: This will Increase the efficiency of laboratory operations and improve laboratory quality control. COST CALCULATION: Sample Receiving Area $15,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP END EXP END EXP END EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 N D J F M IS 15 A M A S 1995 0 ; N D F ; M A M d J A S 1996 0 N D J F M A IM J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $15 s0 $0 $16 $0 $15 $0 $0 $15 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 TOTAL 380 YR $0 SO s0 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $16 $0 s0 $15 $0 $15 $0 $0 $15 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 2/94 $15 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $15 : COMMENTS: 2125193 4:25 Pg 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - # 94-04$1-03 PROD TITLE: (S) METTLER BALANCE _ ESTIMATED COST: $4 (x 1000) DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for replacement equipment foS he 1993-94 4 fiscal year, PURPOSE: improve equipment reliability, Increase analytical capability. Better time utilization. COST CALCULATION: Mettler Balance $ 4,000 FUNDING REQUIRFMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP END EXP ENC EXP 1994 O N D A M A M 4 t 4 1995 0 N D A F M M J J A S 1996 0 ; N D A , M i i A M , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1STYR $0 E4 s0 $0 84 $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 $$0 $0 so $0 $0 0 $4 $0 $0 $4 SO 54 SC SO 54 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 1194 $4 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $4 COMMENTS: This project will be funded jointly by division 0481 and 0480. The funds will be allocated $4,000 from 0481 and $1,000 from 0480. 3/25193 4:52 P4 S, 1994 _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 94-0481-04 PROJ TITLE: (R) MiCROPNOCESSOR ESTIMATED COST: $3 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 14 f DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for the replacement of an existing Specific ION Microprocessor. I PURPOSE: The Microprocessor will replace an existing Microprocessor. COST CALCULATION: Microprocessor $3,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 O N ; D ; J ; F ; M A M J 3 3 J A S 1995 0 ; N D J F M ; A M J J A S 1996 0 N D J F M A M J J A ; S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 1 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 $0 $3 $0 SO $3 ENCUMBERANCE DATES; PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 5194 $3 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $3 J COMMENTS: 12125193 4:29 Pg a i 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0481-05 FROJ TITLE (T} DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM i ESTIMATED COST: $4 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 12 DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for the continued development of the computer data manage- ment system that will include the networking of 4 workstations and direct Interface with lab instrumentation. PURPOSE: Improved data handling capability. Improved efficiency. COST CALCULATION: 486 Computer Jerminal d Software) $4,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP END EY,P ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 N D J F ; M 4 4 A ; M J ; A S ; 1995 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 1996 0 N D J F M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BONO REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 SO $0 $0 $0 SO SO $0 SO $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: I PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 1194 $4 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $4 COMMENTS: I 2125193 4:30 Fig 1994 APITAi, IMr'ROVEMENT PRCJECT # 94-0481-06 PROJ TITLE: (R) GAS CHROMATOGRAPH ESTIMATED COST: S2: (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 14 DESCRIPTION; This project will provide for the replacement of a 10 year old Gas Chromatograph, PURPOSE; Improved analytical capabilities. Improved efficiency, COST CALCULATION: Gas Chromatograph $25,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP END EXP ENO EXP 1094 0 N D 25 25 J F M ; A M J J A S 1995 0 ; N ; D J F, A M , M J J A ; S ; I1998 0 N D J F M A. M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $25 $0 s0 $0 $25 $25 $0 $0 $0 $25 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 50 $0 50 SO 50 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 50 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $26 $0 50 $0 $25 $25 $0 $0 !'0 $25 ENCLIMBERANCE DATES; PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 3194 $25 Engineering Design inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $26 L ! COMMENTS; This project will be funded Jointly by division 0481 and 0480. The funds will be allocated $25,000 from 0481 and $8,000 from 0480. 2125193 4111 p 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0481-07 PROJ TITLE: (S) WATERSHED MONITORING .ti ESTIMATED COST, $4 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT; 14 DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for the purchase of monitoring equipment for the water- shed management program. PURPOSE: Remote sampling equipment for the collection of samples to aid in the protection of the watershed. i ~ I I COST CALCULATION: Watershed Monitoring Equipment $4,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x Ill ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP END EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 ; N D J F M ; A ; M J 4 4 J ; A S ; 1995 0 ; N 0 J F M ; A M ; J J A S 1996 0 N D J F M A M J J A S ; I ~ ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL t TOTAL 1 ST YR $0 $4 $0 s0 $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 s0 s0 s0 $0 s0 $0 SO $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 I ENCUMBERANCEDATES: , PHASE DATE AMOUNT { General Purchase 5194 $4 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $4 i COMMENTS: This project will be funded jointly by division 0481 and 0480. The funds will be allocated $4,000 from 0481 and $3,000 from 0480, 5127193 11:7 Pg M -1895 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER LABORATORY 0481 ` 7-PROJEC g ~ BOND CURRENT -IN ;NUMBED AID DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (S x 1000) 9S-0481-01 (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $2 so $0 f $0 95-0481-02 (T) GAS CHROMATOGRAPH/MASS SPEC. $55 $55 $2 $0 95-0481-03 (S) WATERSHED MONITOAING a0 $6 $O $6 $0 SO $0 SO TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP 83 5S e 0 0 L3/25193 20,22 Pg I i t 1995 _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0481-01 PROJ TITLE: (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM ESTIMATED COST: $2 (x 1000) DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for the link of labors M GROUP benchtop equipment to the division information management system. PURPOSE: Increase data handling capabilities, Improving efficiency, and accuracy, COST CALCULATION: Hardware Link Up & Software $2,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N D ; J ; F A ; M M J 2 2 J A S , 1996 0 N 0 J F M A M J J A S 1997 0 N 0 J F M A M J ; J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $2 $0 SO $2 $0 $2 s0 $0 $2 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 s0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 b0 $0 s0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $O $2 $0 $0 $2 $0 $2 $0 $0 $2 I ENCUMBERANCE DATES: 4 PHASE DATE AMOUNT f General Purchase 5195 $2 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous I i ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $2 COMMENTS: IiI 3125193 20:19 Pg a 1995 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0481-02 PROJ TITLE; (T) GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIMASS SPEC. ESTIMATED COST: $55 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT; 13 DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for the purchase of a gas chromatographl mass spectrometer (GCIMS). PURPOSE: The GCIMS will provide additional organic capabilities and will Increase efficiency and accuracy of organic analysis, COST CALCULATION, GCIMS $55,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N D 55 56 J F M ; A M J J A S ; 1996 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 1997 0 N D J F M ; A M J J A S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $55 $0 $0 $0 $55 $65 $0 $0 $0 $55 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 s0 SO s0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $55 $0 $0 $0 $55 $65 $0 s0 $0 $55 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12195 $55 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $56 1 COMMENTS: This project will be funded Jointly by division 0481 and 0480. The funds will be allocated $55,000 from 0481 and $14,000 from 0480. 2125193 4:35 Pg !llLq 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT T_ # 95-0481-03 PROJ TITLE: (S) WATERSHED MONII ORING ESTIMATED COST; $6 (x 1000) DESCRIPTION: Provide for ',vatershed monitoring equipmenGROUP ASSIGNMENT: iq ~I PURPOSE: Thls will provide for the continued development of a remote watershed monitoring system. I r COST Water Quality Probes $6,000 CALCULATION: f I FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N D J A M F M J 8; 8 J A S r 1996 0 N D J A M J M J A g 1997 0 N D ; J F M A M J J A S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL ' f TOTAL IST YR So $6 s0 $0 $6 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $6 $$0 $0 0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR s0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $6 $0 $0 $6 SO $6 $0 $0 $6 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHAS2 DATE AMOUNT , General Purchase 5/95 $8 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $6 i COMMENTS: 2/26193 4:37 P I 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER LABORATORY 0481 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER OESCRIPTiON TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER (s x 1000) 196-0481-01 (R) LABORATORY RENOVATION $16 $0 $16 s0 $0 96-0461-02 (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 96-0481-03 (S) WATERSHED MONITORING EQUIP $7 $0 $7 $0 $0 ' 96-0481-04 (T) LIQUID CHROM/INFRARED SPEC, $38 $38 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1996 CIP 64 38 28 0 0 i I i I 3125193 22;46 Pg _1996 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 96-0481-01 PROJ TITLE; (R) LABORATORY RENOVATION ESTIMATED COST: $16 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 10 DESCRIPTION: This project would provide for the renovation of the original laboratory hoods and plumbing facilities, and renovations to the Water Reclamation operations laboratory, PURPOSE: To repair deteriorating condition of facility. The harsh laboratory climate requires periodic repair and reconditioning. COST Wastewater Lab $7.000 CALCULATION; Hoods $7,000 Plumbing ; 2.000 $16,000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP 1996 0 N D 16 18 J F M ; A ; M J J ; A ; S ; 1997 0 N D J ; F ; M ; A ; M J ; J ; A ; S 1998 0 N D J ; F M A c M ; J ; J ; A ; S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $16 $0 $0 $16 $0 $18 $0 s0 $18 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRANO TOTAL $0 $18 $0 $0 $18 $0 $18 $0 $0 $16 ENCUMBERANCEDATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 12/95 $18 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $16 COMMENTS: This project will be funded jointly by division 0481 and 0480, The funds will be allocated $16,000 from 0481 and $6,000 from 0480. X2125193 4:39 pg i 1996 ;APITAL IMPROV E---z IN PRO" ,XT # 96-0481-02 PROJ TITLE: (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM ESTIMATED COST: $3 (x 1000) ENT DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for the purchase of GROUP aAS eIGNMe for 1: linking 006) Of the laboratory information system. i I PURPOSE: Improved data handling capabilities; Improved efficiency. COST CALCULATION: Additional Hardware $2,500 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO' EXP ENO EXP 1998 0 N D A M F , J 1 J M 3; 3 1997 C~ ~ N A S A D J M J J A M 1998 0 S N D M J F M S I ENCUM13ERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR SO $3 $0 $0 $3 TOTAL 2ND YR s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $3 $c SO $3 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $G $O $O $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL SO $3 SO $0 $3 $O $$0 $3 3 $0 $0 $0 S0 $O $3 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 240 $3 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $3 COMMENTS: 3125193 22:43 P 1 1996 CAPfTAL )MPROVEM NE T PROJECT # 96-0481-03 PROJ TITLE: (S) WATERSHED MONITORING EQUIP ESTIMATED COST; s7 (x 1000) DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for the purchase of remGROUP ASSIGNMENT: ote sensing equipment 14 i PURPOSE: To equip field monitoring stations with data transmission facilities. This will enable the laboratory to collect data immediately from each remote station, COST CALCULATION: Remote Sensing Equipment $ 7,000 FUNDfNG AECUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) EMC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1996 0 N ; 0 A M J F M i J 7; 7 J A S 1997 O N u J A M J J A Sg 1998 0 N D J F A M J J A M ' S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL I ST YA $0 $7 $0 $0 $7 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7 TOTAL 3RD YA $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $7 $0 $0 $7 so $0 $0 E $0 $ S7 7 s0 $O $7 I ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 6/96 $7 Engineering Design E Inspection f Construction Mfsceflaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $7 COMMENTS: This project will be funded jointly by division 0481 and 0480. The funds will be allocated $7,000 from 0481 and $6,000 from 0480. 2125193 4:42 - I 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96 0481-04 PROJ TITLE, (T) LIQUID CHROM/INFRARED SPEC. i ESTIMATED COST: $38 (x 1000) GROUP DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for the purchase of a liquid ch oml ao graph 13 i Infrared spectrometer (LCIiR). PURPOSE; The LC1JR will enable the Laboratory operation the ability to analyze for additional organics that cannot be analyzed by gas chromatographyt mass spectrometer, COST CALCULATION: Liquid Chromatographllnfrared Spectrometer $38,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1998 0 N D J F ; A M M J 38 38 J A S 1997 0 N ; D ; J ; A F M 1 M J J , A 5 , 1998 0 N D J F ' M ; A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $38 $0 $0 $0 $38 $38 $0 $0 $0 $38 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 TOTAL 38D YR $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $38 $0 $0 $0 $38 $38 $0 $0 so $39 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 4198 $38 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $38 COMMENTS: This project will be fundedjolntly by division 0481 and 0480. The funds will be allocated $38,000 from 0481 and $12,000 from 0480, T 2!25193 4:43 p 6 1997 DIVISION CAPITAL C;lPROVEMEtl i- SUMMARY WASTEWATER LABORATORY 0481 I PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE' CONST,t OTHER (S X 1000) 97-0481-01 (S) LABORATORY EQUIPMENT $2 $0 $2 $0 $0 97-0481-02 (S) WATERSHED MONITORING $4 $0 $4 $0 $0 97-0481-03 (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $3 $0 $3 So $0 97-0481-04 (R) MOBILE EQUIPMENT $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 i 97-0481-05 (R) ADMINISTRATION BLDG. RENOVATION $40 $40 $0 SO $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1997 CIP 61 40 21 0 0 f I 3129/93 16:8 P9 I i >b 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0481-01 PROJ TITLE; (S) LABORATORY EOUiPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $2 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION: This project will replace the laboratory vacuum pump. PURPOSE: To replace old and deteriorated equipment. COST CALCULATION: Vacuum Pump $2,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr, Fourth Qtr, ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 0 0 0 0 ENO E8 2 2 0 0 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $2 so so $2 $0 $2 $0 $0 $2 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 TOTAL 3R0 YR $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 s0 $0 s0 $0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $2 $0 $0 $2 $0 $2 so s0 $2 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 4197 $2 General Purchase + Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $2 COMMENTS: 2125193 4:45 P 1 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0481-02 PROJ TITLE: (S) WATERSHED MONITORING ESTIMATED COST: $4 (x 1000) ~rak: GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 14 I DESCRIPTION: Pecan Creek sampling station repairs. PURPOSE: Make repairs to tre Pecan Creek sampling station located at Mayhill Road. COST CALCULATION: Watershed Monitoring Equipment $4,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Doltars Y. 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1997 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AFC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 $0 $4 $0 s0 $4 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 SO $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 50 so s0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 s0 $4 $0 $0 $4 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 4197 $4 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $4 COMMENTS: This project will be funded Jointly by division 0481 and 0480. The funds will be allocated $4,000 from 0481 and $3,000 from 0480. 2125193 4:48 P9 II 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0481-03 PROJ TITLE: (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM j I ESTIMATED COST: $3 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 12 DESCRIPTION: Replacement of 486 and printer. PURPOSE: To replace an Epson LO-1050 printer with a laser printer and the replacement of 486 computer. COST CALCULATION: Printer $1,000 Computer FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP 1997 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REY AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 i0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 4197 $3 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $3 COMMENTS: 3125193 20:55 Pg 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0411 PROJ TITLE: (R) MOBILE EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $12 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 11 DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Rig 08001. ! i F PURPOSE: To replace a deteriorated vehicle. COST CALCULATION: $12,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr, Second Qtr, Third Qtr, Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 i 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 s0 $12 $0 $0 $12 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR 60 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 GRAND TOTAL. $0 $12 $0 $0 612 $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 1197 $12 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $12 h COMMENTS: This project will be funded jointly by division 0481 and 0480. The funds will be allocated $12,000 from 0481 and $4,000 from 0480. 3129193 16:6 Pg s ,1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0481-05 1 PROJ TITLE: (R) ADMINISTRATION BLDG, RENOVATIONS ESTIMATED COST: $40 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 10 DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for the renovation of the Water Reclamation Administration building. PURPOSE: To renovate the administration building lot use by the Environmental Services Division. Additional laboratory space will be constructed. COST CALCULATION: $40.000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 0 0 40 40 0 0 0 0 1958 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 k~ 1595 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $40 $0 SO $0 $40 $40 $0 $0 $0 $40 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 s0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $40 $0 $0 $0 $40 $40 $0 s0 $0 $40 ENCUMSERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 2197 $40 General Purchase ' Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $40 COMMENTS: 2125193 4:50 Pp o 1898 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY WASTEWATER LABORATORY 0481 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT A1D-IN ;NUMBER DESCRIPTION ff TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER I, (5 X 1000) 98-0481-01 (R) LABORATORY RENOVATIONS $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 98-0481-02 (T) ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT UPGRADE $12 50 $12 $0 SO I 98-0481-03 (N) MOBILE EQUIPMENT 0 $12 $$0 0 $0 98-0481-04 (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $12 $ $3 98-0481-05 (1) PARKING EXPANSION $20 $20 $0 $ SO $0 50 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1998 C(P 59 20 39 0 0 i !1 I i I ~ I i f i L3125193 2113 Pg 1 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 98-0481-01 PROJ TITLE: (R) LABORATORY RENOVATIONS ESTIMATED COST: $12 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 10 DESCRIPTION: The project will provide for the renovation of the Water Reclamation Operations laboratory. f PURPOSE: Improve analytical testing capacity. Improved efficiency. COST CALCULATION: Plumbing $4,000 Electrical $3.000 Structural $6.00 0 $12,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr, Fourth Qtr, ENO EXP ENO F.XP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AID OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $12 $0 s0 $12 s0 $12 $0 $0 112 I T TOTAL 3RD YP $0 $0 $0 $0 OTAL 2ND YR $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 I GRAND TOTAL $0 $112 s0 $0 $1 0 r1 $$0 so $0 so $0 0 $112 $0 $0 $12 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT i f Genera '',}rchase 2/98 $12 General Purchase ! Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $12 j COMMENTS: ! y 2125193 4,52 Pg 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0481-02 I-- - PROJ TITLE. (T) ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT UPGRADE ESTIMATED COST: $12 (x 1000) r 9 GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 14 DESCRIPTION: The project will provide for the upgrade of the Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. PURPOSE: This will increase analytical testing capacity and provide grrater efficiency. COST CALCULATION: Hardware replacement $8.000 Software replacement $4.00 0 $12,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr, Second Qtr, Third Otr, Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP-.1 1998 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BONO REV AIC OTHER TOTAL. BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $12 60 $0 $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $112 $0 s0 $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 2198 $12 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $12 COMMENTS: 2/25193 4:53 Pg it -1998 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROD CET # 98-Oa81-03^ r PROJ TITLE: (N) MOBILE EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $12 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 11 DESCRIPTION: The project will provide for th• purchase of a new vehicle for sampling 11 requirements. I PURPOSE: Add vehicle to meet the required testing requirements of the Clean Water Act. f i COST CALCULA7ION: $12,000 i FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (in Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP Fourth Qtr. ENO 1998 0 0 12 0 0 EXP ENO EXP i 0 12 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES f BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $12 $0 s0 $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 2/98 $12 General Purchase Inspection Construction Mlsceltanecus f ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $12 COMMENTS: This will be funded jointly from Divisions 0481 and 0480, The funds will be f allocated $12,000 from 0481 and $4,000 from 0480. 2125193 414 P 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0461-04 PROD TITLE: (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM i ESTIMATED COST: $3 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 12 DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for the continued development of the computer data management system that will Include the networking of 4 workstations and direct Interface with lab Instrumentation. PURPOSE: Improved data handling capability. Improved efficiency. I , COST CALCULATION: 488 Computer (Terminal 3 Software) $3,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMB£RANCES/CASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1998 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 It "'1} 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1STYR $0 $3 s0 $0 $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL3RO YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 $0 $3 s0 $0 $3 ENCUMBERANCE DAMES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 2198 $3 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $3 COMMENTS: 3125193 21:2 Pg 1998 i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0481-05 PROJ TITLE: (1) PARKING EXPANSION ESTIMATED COST: $20 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 10 DESCRIPTION: The project will provide for additional parking spaces for the Environmental Services Division, PURPOSE: Provide additional spaces for employee and visitor parking improving safety and access. COST CALCULATION: $20,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Ott, Third Ott, Fourth Ott. ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1998 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BONO REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $20 $0 $0 $0 $20 $20 $0 $0 $0 $20 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $20 $0 $0 $0 $20 $20 $0 $0 $0 $20 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purct ise 2198 $20 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $20 COMMENTS: I i W5/934; 57 Pg 1994 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY PRETREATMENT 0483 PROJECTS NUMBER BOND CURRENT AID-IN DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHES E (S X 1000) 94-0483-02 (S) LOCKING SAMPLE REFRIGERATORIFR $7 $0 $7 $0 SO 94-0483-03 (S) PRETREATMENT SAMPLINGISAFETY E $9 $0 $9 SO $0 94-0483-04 (T) SAMPLING PLATFORM/WASTEWATER 1 $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 94-0483-05 (T) SAMPLING PLATFORMlWASTEWATER 1 $3 $0 $3 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1994 CIP 22 0 22 0 0 i li 02719310,17 _ py 1954 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT H 94-0483-02 PROJ TITLE: (S) LOCKING SAMPLE REFRIGERATOR/FREEZER ESTIMATED COST: $7 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION: Commercial sized unit with capability of maintaining sampies at constant 4 degrees C and allowing for the manufacture of Ice. PURPOSE: To comply with regulations required for proper storage and transport complicnce samples. COST CALCULATION: Refrigerator/Freezer $7,000 1 I FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (li, nollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 N D 7 7 J F M ; A M J J A S 1995 0 N D J F M ; A M J J A S 1996 0 N 0 J F M ; A M J J A S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDiTURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YA $0 $7 $0 $0 $7 $0 $7 $0 $0 $7 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 s0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $7 $0 $0 $7 s0 $7 $0 $0 $7 ENCUMBERANCEDATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 1194 $7 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $7 COMMENTS: 2126193 20:22 p9 p .l L_1994 _CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 94-0483-03 PROJ TITLE: (S) PRETREATMENT SAMPLING/SAFETY EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $9 (x 1000 GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION: Additional monitoring and sampling equi;.,menl and personnel safety equipment. PURPOSE: Compliance with Federal regulations and confined space entry policy. i COST CALCULATION: Autosampler $4.000 Radio $1.000 Gas monitor $3,000 Ventilator $ 1.000 $9.000 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSlENCUMBERANCES (in Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1994 0 9 9 N D J ; F ; M ; A M 3 J A S ; 1995 0 N ; D J ; F M 11 A M J A ; S 1996 O N D J F M ; A M J ; J ; A ; S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $0 $9 $0 s0 $9 $0 $9 $0 s0 $9 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $O $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $9 $0 $9 $0 $O $9 ENCUMBERANCE DATES; PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 10/94 $9 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $0 COMMENTS: ?125193 20:23 Pg 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0483-04 PROJ TITLE: (T) SAMPLING PLATFORM/WASTEWATER INFLUENT ESTIMATED COST: $3 (x 1000) ASSIGNENT: DESCRIPTION: Corrosion-resistant platform with safety railingsO susp ended across the raw14 wetwell. PURPOSE: To allow the safe support of personnel and automatic samplers in compliance with NPDES requirements. COST CALCULATION: Construction and materials $3,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUM B ERANC ES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1994 O N D J 3 3 F M A ; M J J A S 1995 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 1996 0 N D ; J ; F M A M J S J A , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 18T YR $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 $0 $3 s0 $0 $3 TOTAL 2ND YR 60 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 TOTAL 3R0 YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase U94 $3 Engineering Design Inspectlon Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $3 COMMENTS: 3125193 211:21 Pg 1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 94-0483-05 PROJ TITLE (T) SAMPLING PLATFORM/WASTEWATER INFLUENT ESTIMATED COST: $3 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT 14 DESCRIPTION: Corroslon-resistant platform with safety railings suspended across the raw wetwell. PURPOSE; To allow the safe support of personnel and automatic samplers in compliance with NPDES requirements. COST CALCULATION; Construction and materials $3,000 I FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC £XP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1994 0 N D J 3 3 F M A M J J A S r 1995 0 N D J F M ; A M J J A S 199$ 0 N D J F M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES '.ASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 s0 BRAND TOTAL $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 s0 $3 $0 s0 $3 i ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 1/94 $3 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $3 COMMENTS; 2/25193 20:27 Pg _ 1995 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY PRETREATMENT 0483 PROJECTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BOND CURRENT AID-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER, (3 X 1000) 95-0483-01 (T) PRETREATMENT EQUIPMENT 95-0483-02 (G) MAINTENANCE BUILDING RENOVATIO $12 $0 $10$12 $0 $0 95-0483-03 (T) DIV;NFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM a1 ao S 1 $0 $1 $0 $0 0 so I TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1995 CIP - 23 ~ 0 23 0 0 1 t 1 f 1 I 3/25193 2110 Pg p y i. L1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0483-01 PROJ TITLE (T) PRETREATMENT EQUIPMENT _ ESTIMATED COST: $12 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT; 14 DESCRIPTION: This project would provide new monitoring equipment for the Industrial Pretreatment Program, PURPOSE: Continued maintenance of system surveillance and protection against illegal discharge on-site security for sampling equipment, i COST Autosampier/Flowmeter S 71000 CALCULATION; Trailer $ 5.000 $12,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1995 0 N 0 J F M 12 12 A M J J A S 1996 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 1997 0 N D J F M A M J J A S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $12 $0 $O $12 $0 $12 $0 $0 $12 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $O $0 $O $O $0 s0 $O $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 s0 $0 $O $O $O $O $O $0 $O GRAND TOTAL $0 $12 $0 $O $12 $O $12 $0 $0 $12 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 3195 $12 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCETOTAL $12 COMMENTS, 2125193 2018 Pg y 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-0483-02 s PROJ TITLE: (G) MAINTENANCE BUILDING RENOVATIONS ESTIMATED COST; $10 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT; 10 DESCRIPTION: This project will allow space for additional storage, sample, and automatic sampler preparation and office space, PURPOSE: Provide for replacement of current storage building lost to proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion, i COST CALCULATION: Shelving, cabinets, plumbing modifications, HVAC $10,000 i FUNDING AEQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSJENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP I 1995 0 ; N D J F M A M J 10 10 J A S ; 1990 0 N D ; J F M ; A ; M J J A S ; 1997 0 N D J ; F ; M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH E`CPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL I I , TOTAL ISTYR $0 $10 $O $0 $10 $O $10 $0 s0 $10 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 SO $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRANO TOTAL $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 $O $10 s0 $0 $10 ENCUMSERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT I General Purchase 5195 $10 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERAINCE TOTAL $10 COMMENTS: 2/25/93 20,29 Pg 3 ri 1995 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 95-04183-03 PROJ TITLE: (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM ESTIMATED COST: $1 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 12 DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for the continued development of the computer data management system that will include the networking of 4 workstations and direct interlace with lab instrumentation PURPOSE; Improved data handling capability and improved efficiency. I COST CALCULATION; Terminal and Software $1,000 I i FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (in Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1995 0 N ; D 1 1 J F M A M J J A S F M 1998 0 ; N D J ; A M J J A S 1997 O N D J F M ; A M J J A S ; ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1STYR $0 $1 $0 s0 $1 $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $1 $0 $0 $1 $0 $1 $0 SO $1 cNCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 1/95 $1 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $1 COMMENTS: 3125103 21:27 PO i A 1996 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY PRETREATMENT PROGRAM LABORATORY 0483 PROJECTS GOND CURRENT AID-IN NUMEIER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER f (S x 1000) 96-0483-01 (G) OFFICE EQUIPMENTIFURNITURE $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 l 96-0483-02 (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM $2 $0 $2 $0 $0 96-0483-03 (S) REMOTE MONITORING EQUIPMENT $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 96-0483-04 (T) SPILL PREVENTIONIDISP EQUIP ES SO $5 $0 $0 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1896 CIP 22 0 2'0 0 i i I I 3125193 22:41 p~ Y. 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0483-01 PROJ TITLE: A OFFICE EQUtPMENTIFURNITURE ESTIMATED COST, $5 (x 1000) I GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION; Additional work space and equipment necessary to meet demands of regulatory expansion. PURPOSE: Provide for necessary stall increases and work spacee In renovated wastewater maintenance building. COST CALCULATION: Office Equipment/Furniture $5,000 R FUNDING REOUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS+ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars z 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP i 1996 0 N 0 J A ~ F ; M ; M J 5 5 J A S 1997 0 N D J F A M J M J A S . 1998 0 N 0 J J A S A M J M , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $5 $0 s0 $5 SO $S $0 $0 $5 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $5 $0 $0 $5 so $ a5 s $0 so $ s0 $5 $0 o a5 £NCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 6/99 $5 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMSERANCE TOTAL $5 COMMENTS: 2/25193 20,34 1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0483-02 PROJ TITLE: IT) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM , 1 ESTIMATED COST: $2 (x1000) GPOUP ASSIGNMENT: 12 DESCRIPTION, This project will provide for the continued development of the computer data management system that will include the networking of 4 workstations and direct interface with lab instrumentation. PURPOSE: Improved data handling capability and improved efficiency. COST CALCULATION: Terminal & Software $1,500 I I FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSIENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1996 0 N D J F M 2 2 A M J J A S 1997 0 N ; D J ; F M A M ; J J A S 1998 0 N 0 ; J ; F ; M ; A ; M J J ; A ; S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR $0 $2 SO $0 $2 $0 $2 $0 s0 $2 TOTAL 2ND YR $D s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $2 $0 $0 $2 s0 $2 SO $0 $2 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 1196 $2 Engineering Deslgn Inspection Construction Miscellaneous i ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $2 COMMENTS: 3126193 22:37 Pg k A d 1996 _ _ _ _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 9-9- --483--3 PROJ TITL (S) REMOTE MONITORING EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $10 (x 1000) ASIGNMENT: DESCRIPTION: This project will allow for the purchase of in ustririal mo nitoring equipment, 14 PURPOSE: Protection of drinking water supplies and compliance with new State and Federal regulations concerning watershed protection. To provide automated monitoring of industrial sites and characterization of wet weather storm flows. COST CALCULATION: Autosampler/Flowmeter and Remote Sensing Equipment $10,000 I I FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWSlENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENC EXP 1990 0 N D J F M 10 10 A ; M J J A g 1997 0 N ; D J ; F A M J M J A S , 1998 0 N D ; J ; A M F M ; J J A ; S , ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BONE) REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $10 $0 SO $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $r $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 f0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 S10 $0 $0 $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 2198 S10 Engineering Design Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $10 I COMMENTS: fl 2/25193 20,39 _ pg I I I i `1996 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 96-0463-04 } PROJ TITLE: (T} SPILL PREVENTION/DISP EQUIP ESTIMATED COST: $5 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT; 14 DESCRIPTION: This project will provide funding for the purchase of additional spill prevention equipment and disposal material. PURPOSE: This equipment would allow the Division the ability to respond to small quantity spills in a safe, effective manner. i I COST CALCULATION: Miscellaneous Spill Equipment $5,000 $10,000 (BArrels, Absorbant Pitlows/Materials, Diking Material) FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:CASH FLOWS/ENCUMBERANCES (In Dollars x 1000) ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1996 O N D J F M A M J 5 5 J A S 1997 0 N D J F M ; A M J J A S 1998 O N D J F M A M J J A S ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BONO REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $5 $0 $0 $5 $0 $5 $0 $0 $5 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $5 $0 $0 $5 s0 $5 $0 $0 $5 ENCUMBERANCE DATES, PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 4/95 $5 Engineering Design Inspection I Construction Miscellaneous E ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $5 4I COMMENTS: 2/25/93 20:42 Pg _4 i r 1997 DIVlSlON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY _ PRETREATMENT 0483 PROJECTS BOND CURRENT AID-IN CUMBER DESCRIPTION TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER a, I (5 X 1000) 97-0483-01 (S) SAMPLING EQUIPMENT $10 50 $10 $0 $0 97-0483-02 (R) BUILDING RENOVATIONS $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 1 I f TOTALS FOR YEAR -1997 CIP 20 0 20 0 0 I I 318193 11;5 P9 "s 1997 - _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMEN RPT OJECT # 97-0483-01 i PROJ TITLE: (S) SAMPLING EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $10 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for needed Improvements in the Pretreatment Program. The Proposed equipment will upgrade existing sampling capabilities. PURPOSE: Improved equipment reliability and industrial monitoring capabilities. COST Sampling Equipment $ 7,000 CALCULATION: Miscellaneous Equipment L0-0-0 $10,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP ENO EXP 1997 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i } 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` 0 p ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YA $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YA $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 GRAND TOTAL SO $10 s0 $0 $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 1/97 $10 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $10 COMMENTS: 2!25/93 20:45 Pg s 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 97-0483-02 PROJ TITLE: (R) STORAGE BUILDING UPGRADE ESTIMATED COST: $10 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 10 DESCRIPTION: This project would provide for the renovation of the original laboratory hoods, floors, and ceiling. it PURPOSE: • To repair deteriorating condition of facility. COST CALCULATION: Building Renovation $10,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUM8ERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (in Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr, Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1997 10 0 0 t0 ENC EXP 1998 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 19% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iENCUMBERANCES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REVN C EXPENDITURES TOTAL I TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 $0 $10 $0 s0 $10 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL 30 $10 s0 so $10 $0 $to $0 $0 $10 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 10107 $10 € General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $10 COMMENTS: 3125183 21:37 Pg 1998 DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY .w PRETREATMENT 0483 PROJECTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION BOND CURRENT AiD-IN TOTAL FUND REVENUE CONSTR OTHER 'i (3 X 1000) 98-0483-01 (T) DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM 98-0483-02 (S) REMOTE MONITORING EQUIPMENT $3 $0 $3 $0 so 98-0483-03 (R) SAMPLING EQUIPMENT $4 $0 $10 $0 5o 3a $0 $4 $0 30 TOTALS FOR YEAR - 1998 CIP 17 0 17 Q 0 I } 3125193 22:35 Pg f i I { 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0483-01 PROJ TITLE: M DIV INFORMATION MGMT SYSTEM ESTIMATED COST: $3 (X 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 12 DESCRIPTION: This Project will provide for the continued development and maintenance of the data management system. PURPOSE: Improved data handling and efficiency. COST CALCULATION: Terminals, software, accessories $2,500 f FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x t000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1998 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1 ST YR s0 $3 $0 s0 $3 $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $3 $0 $0 $3 s0 $3 $0 $0 $3 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 10198 $3 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $3 COMMENTS: I t 3125193 22:33 Pg j r v, L1998 _ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0483-02 PROJ TITLE: (S) REMOTE MONITORING EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $10 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: DESCRIPTION: Purchase of additional equipment linked together by waternet telemetry and providing either permanent or portable placement. PURPOSE: To enhance water quality monitoring capabilities with minimum personnel. COST CALCULATION: AutosamplerlFlowmeteNTransmitdK $10.000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANC£SlCASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 1998 10 t0 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REVH EAIC NDIOTHER TOTAL TOTAL IST YR $0 $10 $0 s0 $10 $0 Vo so s0 $10 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 $0 $10 $0 $0 $10 ENCUMBERANCE OATES: I PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 11/98 $10 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous SNCUMBERANCE TOTAL $10 COMMENTS: 2118/93 10:27 P i 1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT # 98-0483-03 PROJ TITLE: (R) SAMPLING EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED COST: $4 (x 1000) GROUP ASSIGNMENT: 13 DESCRIPTION: This project will provide for needed improvements in the pretreatment program. The proposed equipment will upgrade existing sampling capabilities. PURPOSE: Improved equipment reliability and Industrial monitoring capabilities. COST CALCULATION: Sampling Equipment $4,000 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: ENCUMBERANCESICASH EXPENDITURES (In Dollars x 1000) First Qtr. Second Qtr. Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr. ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP ENC EXP 5998 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENCUMBERANCES CASH EXPENDITURES BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL BOND REV AIC OTHER TOTAL TOTAL 1ST YR $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 so $4 $0 $0 S4 TOTAL 2ND YR $0 s0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL 3RD YR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 GRAND TOTAL $0 $4 $0 $0 $4 s0 $4 $0 $0 $4 ENCUMBERANCE DATES: PHASE DATE AMOUNT General Purchase 3198 $4 General Purchase Inspection Construction Miscellaneous ENCUMBERANCE TOTAL $4 COMMENTS: i 2!25193 20:52 Pg I AS k ,A t CITY OF DENTON WATER RECLAMATION 0470 :11►r WASTEWATER TAEATMEMr ASA IRpVN MM23 17 HEAVY EW1P OPC11 fORC IV TREATMENT ]IU SCtK 4CF MAINt 'CEV LGO ILD~W~ M. NILLIARO L TAYLOR V. GRAY 1 R. PlicRD AE20 3 HAD ;o ICAa LgzCTTo::CC II LA•.5...._... J I[AVI EQUIP OKA UM MINT. WCRKER I M, WHATLCY HL. GAMEY AE21 3 1 I ,110 2 VV POXESS TECH SAINT MECN ❑ MAINT 'IT CH 1 MINT. VKA 1 V. NIASCNS MAY C. SHELTpM SEAS@NL CFI13 6 Cf f7 I AD7{ , CiA•I CS I PLANT CPU 1/VV PLANT 3PU IL VV MAINT MECH II MINI ME[H I MAIN?, '.AR 1 V CASE T, itrlµRS T. HALL M COCAREHL SEASONAL (C61 A CTBO 6 U97 { AS" A :u6 S! PLµi OPU VVV PLwI OPEA IVVV MAINZ MECN it MIMT MC[H I M. 060 • Mc 13[1 E, KROYM" J. :(7111 R. HARP: ( CF IO I CE 11 { AD" Y PLANT CIIU t/WV PERM WER LUVV M S10VCA L LCVIS CORD I Us0 6 PLANT OPER IVVV S. Ax CTII { rp-LM-T -OF"- -11, 11-W . Now*% u T0a I A SHEET #i2 w-lA-/) RECLASSIFIED PC711IOM C,\CM0R471\W-LAI-PV" r ' CITY OF DENTON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISIONS 0480-0481-0483 DIVUUINNCNTAL LEAV ADIW JIM CQLTEIt DUD RFT 0401 12 SECKfARY WIGHT ID44 RFT 0400 4 c+~ElusT 0trF VEA00SH PRrRAT PRDG DHTO RFT 0101 11 NCCILLJ711G11 W24 RFT 0480 0481 ASSISTANT CHEAST W rECH PQLL UT M CON ASATE OFF SPECT DAVIS MQTVORTH ma RFT 0400 0 U50 WT 0401 S ~S~ RFT 0407 7 IIS T 0407 i LAD TECH Tal W ASSISTANT ASST ISSTR CWA13T SPECT Use WT 04-0 CC50 PA WT 0401 7 TEW 0 402 0 ]P 0407 0 AAKIN DnM t rLAN AssuT04T •••••••1 HAN011,R'f VACANT 0 O'C20 tDN► 000 is Cesa ..::....a{_D-0.: AM wrm 1 VACANT Nm nm DRAFT COPY .R,:osEa rosaw" SHEET #14 w-1rn ov7naRGrrnrv-sLwG I I I I~ r, r- SUPU CI'1'1' OF DENTON D OF „~W rN1D TI 1 a WQVN RV WATER/WASTEWATER SERVICES Kay 0{66 12 0,161-0462-0471-0810 PERFORM. CQNTRIII. SR. IAG. AID[ C. SNITN C(4y 0461 y M INC. AIDE CC41 0461 M M AIDE E mc-AwII C[4f 1462 y TNWI. rmrmN rONENAN L NAVE! K. L71 va °OREIMN MIO 1471 f N14S 6461 4 r HALKNI Ur r,RCDUHVISM N PATER/VV REPAIR VAl$ 046 REPAIR NItS N62 1 Nils 1161 K. PAru4 11PERVIS7l0 DRAINAGE V. METER REPAIR HYDRANT ~ VA(, f VE NITS 1/fl f JIN17 is VATCR/W TAPPING N72S 0011 f U[v L[MC1 CREW L[ADER MAIN REPLACEMENT DRAIN /REPAIR/MAINT 1. NV LE VA7IN NETrA NECH Q [AEV LEADER KzS x171 M MRRQV S AIRS Nfi ! KIANLE 0411 Area (INTO QP 1 171L I7T 1CCN 1 [REV LEADER S AEA 0462 f AE2S~pjt1 7 K27~ A0171 y IMP SMiH 1 RICNMDSCN VAT" NEVER UTLITY TECH AE20 OIu / L tDRRCI P. STIVCNDpN KCH E I UTILITY TECH 1 13 HEAVY 4627 0171 S 1142 HEATH VILLITY TC[N 1 / CHI! 0161 4 DD 71NAi[ VILLIC lOT AD7I 0461 LL1T MV LEADER AD71 1171 .LICKSW WATER KT[R T(CN I / AEPO A(20 1011 y AD 71 At L. G II61 / 4.2S lu'. y L ADIO CMICE y CINY TECH 1 UTAI VIL L TEEN t 4461 1 M11 0461 1 A A070 KIAMT Af20 IDtIIP lJP UTLIIT T(CH 1 UTILITY tECH 1 PER R. lMEAW " 0171 ft. I 1 IaQVN v^rER Xl'IN MICH I NAWT. 1 DIIO y AD? 0441 / A071 0161 1 K VCt7lC vb1K'ER i unLrn rz[H r A''F~' 1111 4 M MAS tl11 A NICKS WAVY EQUIP tip ARM KATHY. VCRIKER 1 UTLIrY TECH 1 V~,i PAIN 1171 t AO )1 N4RDlD fQS1ER AN ~ ~ i 0471 / A(R0 Dill y TINI MI VAC MARGQ M IwIPT MA1Ni• IrbrKCR 1 VAC T / AD1C 1462 / y AI~I1C17 1CCH I LIGHT [QUIP LIP Avil IVM~MAIHTVLRMER 1 Ulilll TECH r A71f 1461 1 AD70 1171 1 CACCD 061MPE 0161 Y T. AD7I ILIT T 0471 VAC NI ME TEA WCH I V[1RA[A 0010 All V L ~Wr' r UTD Iir r••..PER MAINT u . V 1Q0451 KER 2 T. MAIN I• out VDRKCR 1 4 AD% 1462 / R 1 At 0 IT[T1 61 K AD71 NTo 4 tl IN 0491 I 1 rACIMDS KEI➢CR Roil MC1NC1 CIACIC V Mt1[RMIGNr 4 11it1 OflO AIII I/h V..........•/ 1 AI] I RNIC 2 ~.....~PER PAINT, VDIK[R C 1 rDrQLNDf KEEPER ~ NAINT. VQRxEN t y AILS IL tON •••u••.•FAMQSEO POSITIONS 1•:2... °,L/. . . LI 14 71 NK 1 Al10 1171 R. INT, vu KER 1 KAIN1. VQRAIR I kEORGANIZATIQN A111 01U 2 AinnN 1i{I 2 mtdL CUAL t1m R.wL&K IC., Lum SHEET TI DOW NINA T Art Rll aw S VIN NTA REP M/ 4 PAINT VKR 2 #11 PAINT VKR 1 / 2 114-14 93 CAr4\ERL9)\ V- W2-S.DvG 1 r CITY OF DENTON WATER/WASTEWATER ENGINEERING 0,163 - 0,172 ENGINEERING ADNIH GCRAL.D COSGROVC DC IS 0112 U }R. ENGINEER CNG =JnWOW DANIENG TECH 11 SR. ENG. TECH 111 DLIS 016] 12 DART MYCRS N1AC fC[U CARS ER 7 CH30 0172 g SR ENG SOLID VASIE ENG. INTERN 1! H I DLIS 0163 {2 fM20 0163 SU ACIC6172 s T 7 fN:0l'L:Lo CNG ASSOC . 1 [EW-, ,INTERN I1 EN. H 1 M2p 9172 s{~ SCAN PONDER C[10 0163 y ENG, ASSOC. I fNG INTERN 11 GI CNN GARY D175 0172 9 FM20 01)2 SI7 DRAFT COPY SHEET #13 01 01-9] G\CN\ORG\VVV-FNG.DV4 I (i11I'00CS 1R(f 1+4Ff .ltt RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, COM- PLYING WITH THE ORDER FOR INFORMATION BY REGION 6 OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, AS CONTAINED IN DOCKET O. VI-91-2641; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City ~of ,Denton discharges effluent under the au- thority of NPDES Permit No. TX 0047180 issued by Region 6 of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)1 and WHEREAS, under the authority of the Clean Water Act, the EPA has initiated a Municipal Water Pollution Prevention (MWPP) pro- gram; and WHEREAS, to further the purposes of the MWPP, Region 6 of the EPA has issued an order (Docket No. VI-91-2641), requesting that the City issue this resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP DENTON, TEXASI S_S,'i'ION T. That, hf compliance with the Municipal Water Pol- lution Prevention Order for Information (Docket No. VI-91-2641), dated September S, 1991, from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), requiring the completion and submission of an Environmental Audit for the Denton Wastewater Treatment Plant on a yearly basis, the City council informs EPA Region 6 that the following actions will be or have been taken to maintain compliance with NPDES Permit Mo. TX 00471801 1. That it has reviewed the Municipal Water Pollution Pre- vention Environmental Audit Report (attached to this resolution as Exhibit A). 2. That it has taken thn following actions necessary to main- tain permit requirements contained in NPDES Permit No, TX0047180, effective November 25, 19911 a. Began construction in Auquet, 1992 of the wastewater treatment facilities necessary to expand form IP MOO to 15 MOD and provide the process improvements needed to comply with the Texas Water Commission and Environ- mental Protection Agency permit requirements; b. Provided funding in the 1944-98 Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan to minimize infiltration and inflow and prevent overflow from the wastewater collection system; and o. Provided funding in the 1994-96 Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan to construct a composting facility to • t promote a beneficial reuse program for wastewater sludge. 3. That it will consider approval of a 1993-98 Capital Im- provement Plan and FY 1994 Annual operating Budget that will adequately fund the operation and capital expense necessary foe permit compliance. SECTION 11, That this resolution shall become effective imme- diately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1993. BOB CASTLEBERRY, MAYOR ATTESTS JENNIFER WALTERSt CITY SECRETARY BYS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORMS - DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCHO CITY ATTORNEY BYS~~ ~ d ~f . PAGE 2 k 5 ciryof DENTON, TEXAS MUNICIPAL BUILDING / DENTON, TEXAS 76201 / TELEPHONE (817) 568.8307 Office of the City Manager MEMORANDUM TO. Lloyd V. Harrell, City Manager FROM; Joseph Portugal, Assistant to the City Manager DATE: July 190 1993 SUBJECT: Enforcement of Smoking Ordinance As you know Mr. Gene Lewis, 1820 N. Ruddell, Apt. 229, brought to the Council's attention that the Kroger at University Drive and Carroll Boulevard was in violation of the City's smoking ordinance. Upon receipt of the complaint, I contacted Ms. Nonie Kull, Environmental Health Services Manager, and asked that a Sanitarian be sent to the location to investigate. Laurie Callahan of Environmental Health has visited with the manager at Kroger. She apprised the manager of the complaint and reviewed the stipulations of the City's smoking ordinance. Ms. Callahan reports that the management at Kroger was very cooperative and will comply with the ordinance by removing the ashtrays from the deli area and installing new "no-smoking signs." Environmental Services does enforce violations of the ordinance on a complaint only basis. Since Mr. Lewis did not file his complaint with them, they had no prior knowledge of his concern. However, as a matter of routine inspection, sanitarians do ensure that those establishments noted in the ordinance are in compliance. Inspections are scheduled on a quarterly basis unless there are complaints regarding the establishment. Revise Ordinance Attached is a copy of the suggested revisions to the smoking ordinance. Ms. Kull discovered these errors during her review prior to inspection of the Kroger. I am sending this information to Tanya Cooper, Assistant City Attorney, for revision. When she has concluded her review and revised the ordinance, we will bring 0q this back for council action. r Notification of Comoiainant Mr. Gene Lewis will be notified by mail of the staff's response to his complaint. Further, he will be instructed that if he encounters another instance of a smoking violation, he may contact Environmental Services and they will respond to his complaint. If you need additional information, please advise. WYIA~&- JoseW-P-o-rtugai Assistant to the City Manager Attachment 1 k AS N Su,~M,~c~ e' 7Xe- EPA 2 ,7 4AJ 7K(5 ~~C~N7 N'W d n! ~~B A-CC o a~'Uc~L b~~(9J75' ~~Cr~GL r~3cc~rrti'G N~Y~~ ~ y ~ l - ~r r s,~Lo~r G ~ °F lNffMAiraN &*1e6qr3 oc S',uo rrsG d=k C7N y ~.QKI ors o ccs vN 5~~ rN ~ i c,T~ , cw Ai 74 a-o rNo rfy SPECIAL REPORT WAACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH 2013 H St., N.W. • Washington D.C. 20006 • (202) 659-0310 INVOLUNTARY SMOKING: The Factual Basis for Action "INVOLUNTARY SMOKING" or "PASSIVE SMOKING," sometimes even called "RESPIRATORY RAPE" - it all means the same thing: being forced to inhale other people's tobacco smoke. Today we know that this substance, now called "Environmental Tobacco Smoke" (ETS) or "secondhand smoke," is the deadliest danger to which we are exposed. Indeed, it kills more Americans than all forms of air pollution, water pollution, food additives, and radiation combined; more than all automobile accidents, guns, AIDS, and illicit drugs - a staggering 53,000 innocent victims each and every years This document presents the major findings of the Rnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Report on passive smoking and other recent studies in a form which can be used to convince business leaders, legislators, agency officials, judges, and others of the need to protect the majority of Americans who don't smoke (including all children) from the deadly effects of ETS. This, the experts and the agencies tell us, can only be done by restricting smoking in all public places; there is no safe lower level for the dozens of dangerous chemicals in tobacco smoke which drift and are t recirculated, and cannot be filtered out or otherwise eliminated by even the finest ventilation systems. Please help to make this life-saving information as widely available as possible. Feel free to duplicate all or part of this comprehensive reference work, or to request additional copies from ASH. [S2/each] Table of Contenu What We Know About •.T Today )?AGE 2 presents the official findings of five government Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is a "Group A agencies that ETS causes lung cancer in nonsmokers Carcinogen' like asbestos and benzene - one of the few PAGE 3 answers commonly asked questions about how substances known to cause cancer in humans and for we know that ETS causes lung cancer in nonsmokers which there is no safe lower limit, Each year it kills: PAGE s explain how EIS is the third major U3S. killer, ■ an estimated 53,000 Americans: how it kills over $0,000 American each year as more people than all the victims of automobile PAGE 5 answers the tobacco industry's major arguments accidents, including those caused by drunken driven; concerning ETS studies, and provides three questions ■ more than twice as many people as all homicides, which should be asked of any witnesses defending ETS including homicides caused by firearms; PAGE 6 describes how ETS creates very serious health ■ more than twice as many people as AIDS; hazards for all children, and cites the major studies ■ more than ten times as many people as all the illicit PAGE 7 explain how courts protect cMdrea from ETS drugs we target in our 'was on drugs' 1 through court orders and through custody decisions ETS presents even greater dangers to children. Each I j~ j notes what major newspapers and ortanizatiom year, even at the levels found in a home when only one are saying and doing concerning public smoking parent smokes, it is estimated to cause in infants: PAGE 9 indicates the legal theories under which owners ■ 150,000.300,000 lower respiratory infections like and employees are being held liable for permitting pneumonia and bronchitis smoking, and cites some of the major legal decision ■ 7,500.15,0001 Hospitalizations PAGES 10.14 reprint of the complete verbatim text of ■ 200,000.1,000,000 asthma attacks the EPA Report's "Summary and Condusioa" a 8,000.26,000 new cases of asthma 'O PAGE 15 reprints additional important information a increased middle ear effusion from the EPA Report, including additional citation ■ respiratory symptoms of irritation PAGE 16 ells what you can do to protect yourself and ■ significantly reduced lung function others, and where to get additional information ■ a large increase in the risk of death from S.I.DI LEOAL ACTION ANO EDUCATION ON THE HAZAADI Of IMOKINO s ►RCTICTINO THE RIGHTS OR THE NONNtOKINO MAJORITY W,SH SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY _SMOKING Page 2 Official findings that ETS causes lung cancer ENVIRONMENTAL should be used to minimize occupation. among nonsmokers and ETS has been PROTECTION AGENCY al exposure to ETS.' [Current Intelli• documented in both cas"ontrol and gence Bulletin 54 (CIB 54), entitled longitudinal studies, Most of these 'Environmental Tobacco Smoke 'Environmental Tobacco Smoke in the studies have measured the increased risk (ETS) is one of the most widespread Workplace,' p. iii.) of lung cancer among nonsmoking and harmful indoor air pollutants. ETS 'Workers should not be involuntarily women, usually wives exposed to their comes from secondhand smoke exhaled exposed to tobacco smoke.' To pre husband's tobacco smoke. by smokers and sidestream smoke emit- vent worker exposures to any hazud• A 11•Fold increased risk of lung ted from the burning end of cigarettes, ous substances, employers should first cancer has been estimated from these cigars, and pipes. elminate hazwdous workplace e miss ions studies and is consistent with the ETS is a mixture of irritating gases at their source.... amount of exposure to carcinogens and carcinogenic tar particles. It is a Therefore, the best method for con- from ETS, the duration of exposure, known cause of lung cancer and respira• trolling worker exposure to ETS is to and the differences in distribution of tory symptoms, and has been linked to eliminate tobacco use from the work- potential carcinogens between sides heart disease. Breathing in ETS is also place and to implement a smoking stream and mainstream smoke.' [1989 known as 'involuntary" or "passive cessation program." [Id, p 12) Report, p. 77.78] smoking! s Environmental tobacco smoke can be totally removed from the indoor air ANY OPPOSED? NATIONAL RESEARCH only by removing the source (cigarette COUNCIL smoking)... Every governmental, scientific, or of the National Aadeany of Sciences Placing smokers and nonsmokers in medical ot~tymu' which hat separate rooms that are on the same wmir It, ` cob &W, 'The weight of evidence derived from ventilation system also may reduce that ETS atsau!AnDer'4ad epidemiologealstudies shows an assoeia- nonsmokers' exposure to tobacco 'lung eancet~"tsi•aon mokers. tion between ETS exposure of non- smoke; this approaca, however, will Indeed, only the tobacco industry smokers and lung cancer that, taken as probably not eliminate exposure to and people with financial ties to the a whole, it unlikely to be due to chance tobacco smoke since most pollutants industry have publicly questioned or systematic bias.... readily disperse through a common air this finding of more that: it dozen 1. A summary estimate from epidemi- space and since, in public or commercial different prertig'sous organizations. ological studies places the increased risk buildings, most HAVC systems recircu- of lung cancer in nonsmokers married late most of the contaminated indoor to smokers compared with nonsmokers air," [Indoor Air Facts: Environmental married to nonsmokers at about 34%.' Tobacco Smoke, EPA Bulletin No. 5, U.S. SURGEON GENERAL [Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Mea- June, 19891 suring Exposures and Assessing Health "I. Involuntary smoking is a cause of Effects (1986)) disease, including lung cancer, in o y • NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR healthy nonsmokers. OCCUPA77ONAL SAFETY AND 2. The children of parents who smoke NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE HEALTH compared with children of nonsmoking parents have an increued frequency of 'It is the official position of this De- "ETS meets the criteria of the Occupa- respiratory infections, iacreased respin- partment that nonsmoker exposure to tionalSafetyand Health Administration tory symptons, and slightly smaller tobacco smoke, ntthose levels common- (OSHA) for classification as a potential rates of increase in lung functions u the ly found in indoor environments where occupational carcinogen [Title 29 of the lung matures. smoking is permitted, increases the risk Code of Federal Regulations, pan IMI 3, The simple separation of smokers of lung cancer and possibly other NIOSH therefore considers ETS to be and nonsmokers within the same air chronic diseases. We know of no valid a Fotential occupational carcinogen and space may reduce, but does not elimi. arguments to the contrary." [Letter recommends that exposures be reduced nate, the exposure of nonsmokers to from Peter Greenwald, M.D., Dr. of o the lowest feasible concentration. ETS.' [1986 Report] Cancer Prevention and Control, :Jl ..liable rrcventive memures "The relationship between lungcancer ::/14/9:1 This is s speo►1 lure of the AW Snse65q wl Nasld Reeiera (WN 1046.:07)(0). Copyrighted by Anion an Smoking artd Heha (ASH), 701) H IL, NW, Wmk. DC INN. (207) 6314310. ASH is a nrieri eomprok tae:smpt orgsaWdoa enmotsssd rick she pmbtow of smoking and the right, of wonwhora ASH 6 entirely tuooarttd by rudadoctible enouibetiom, red reeuly eneuibvwn reCpK eke ASN lteaiw Printed oortiom of the ASH Artist mss be reprinted wU troll to ASH. W SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Pao 3 glow we knuw ETS causes lung cancer Q. How do we establish that a sub- SECOND, thousands of studies have cancer deaths in nonsmokers? stance causes cancer? demonstra:td that mainstream tobacco At The evidence today is far stronger A: Usually, because the cancer-causing smoke - which contains virtually the and more conclusive than with regard effects are so small, scientists subject same chemicals as ETS - causes cancer to virtually any other chemical. laboratory animalstodoses hundreds or in the lungs of smokers, as well as in In 1986 the National Academy of thousands of times the equivalent of animals such as mice and rats. Sciences - an official and impartial human exposure. Then we see if there THIRD, numerous studies show that body established by Congress - unani- is an increase in the incidence of cancer. nonsmokers absorb large amounts of mously concluded that ETS caused lung in some cues we have been able to these chemicals into their bodies - in cancer in humans. The same year the observe the effects of very high doses some cues the equivalent of a pack a U.S. Surgeon General reached the directly on human; e.g., uranium day - even if they are seated in no- same conclusion. (see page 21 tiOrkers exposed to radon. In both smoking sections, and that they retain Indeed, numerous other scientific and cues, because we have never found a the chemicals for long periods of time, medical organizations reached exactly safe level below which a carcinogen THUS, this evidence even by itself is the same conclusion even prior to the doesn't cause cancer, we must assume - far stronger than that under which EPA Report, and none has ever reached until proven otherwise - that it can most carcinogens are regulated. As the the opposite conclusion, (see page 21 cause cancer in any concentration. U.S. Surgeon General said in has 1986 Report: 'In examining a low-dose expo- Q: Could the EPA have been biased? Q: Does this mars we usually have no sure to a known carcinogen, it is rare to At The EPA Report was prepared by a studies showing that a chemical causes have such an abundance of evidence on large number of scientists with the help cancer at the levels at which it is nor- which to make a judgment, and given of consultants from many different orally encountered) this abundance of evidence, a clear independent organizations. It was then Al That's right - such studies tae usual- judgment can now be made: exposure subjected to scrutiny - including public ly not available. For example there are to [ETS] is a cause of Ifing cancer.' hearings open to all critics and objectors .o studies showing that radon at typical - by a Science Advisory Bond (SAB) levels found in homes causes cancer. Q: How were the epidemiological composed of other scientists. The same is true for most of the other stadia [listed on page 151 done? Even though almost half of the mem- carcinogens regulated by various agen- At The studies examine comparable ben of the SAB, includiegits chairman, ties. Fortunately, these normal-level (so groups of people to see if the one regu- admitted to having direct financial ties called 'epidemiological') studies are July exposed to £TS had higher rata of to the tobacco industry, the SAB never- available for ETS, and show what hap• lung cancer than the one which was theless unanimously agreed with the pets at typical ETS levels in homes, not. In virtually all cues, those ex- EPA that ET5 caused cancer in humans. posed to ETS had higher lung cancer Besides, alleged bias by the EPA can't Q: Is there any evidence, in the ab• rates than those who were not exposed, explain why every other scientific body Bence of these epidemiological studio, Moreover, when it was possible to both here and abroad which examined which shows that ETS ausa cancer? measure the amounts of the exposure, the issue reached the same conclusion. At Yes, many different types: those with the most exposure generally FIRST, more than 40 individual had the highest rata of lung cancer, Q: Is 3000 a large number of deaths? chemicals present is ETS have indepen- A: Yes. It is more than 30 times those dently been found to cause cancer, and Q: How do we know that other estimated to be caused by all EPA•regu- there is obviously no reason to believe "go didn't cause the higher rata? Iated cancer-causing chemicals, (see box that they lose their under-causing prop- At individual researchers and EPA belowl ernes when mixed with other toxins in scientists looked for these other factors. ETS. but found none which could explain the sssst~a higher rates in the many different stud- Aanval Cancer Deaths its in so many different countries. Asbestos , , , , , 15/yr "ETS is a human lung carda• Also it is unlikely that any of these Vinyl chloride , , , <27/yr ogee, responsible forapprozi• other causes would have increased di- Airborne radionuclides 171yr mattly 7,000 lung cancer reply in proportion to ETS exposure, Coke-oven emissions , , <IS/yr deaths annually In U.S. non- Beaune 8/ smokers." (EPA Report tt 1.1.) Q: How strong is the evidence that Arsenic . . . . . . . <S/yr ETS causes lung cancer and lung A .W& A+duAWn" V, 10, Na I, 1990 nit is a ,peed sou of the ASMIna6K a"d ha"Pi iew (ISSN 1014"it), Copyrighted by Action oa Staoklop and Health (ASH) 200 H St„ NW, Wuh., DC 20006, (202) 63!1310. ASH 4 a amnion sonprok tuampe org aWtioa cowwW pith the problems of cinching sad do dghu of ootumokem ASH is a6my n,oooned by tu~de&mWe toombutiou ud reulu motnbuton reeve the ASH AMm Pruned oortiow of the ASH Rtvkv msv 2 • mriated with credit to ASH. II 3H SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Page 4 . ETS is the third major U.S. killer The EPA Report concluded that ETS among people living with smokers, strn.M Th, r4am.bio0 p.mw tmokme w n kmbk causes approximately h'00 nonsmoker In addition the principal author w u~rm somthOly =Tobace wk LM.5'16 GA.R.. deaths annually from lung cancer, but (Glantz) noted that since smokers art t.trm, a J, IS" of Pew" smohmg as t' Han that's only the tip of the iceberg. much more detsely packed in to office 650 1 GI UL . d~t~e d)[ar ds'Tota~ Actually, other studies noted by the than they are in most houses, "we are 9r6 its Tw LIAm Coamaaaim a 16 Was d 9aedmL t.o EPA strongly suggest that ETS causes almost certainly underestimating the )key Du101`'up.µnqul-1241KLTerms;p"" 53,000 U.S. deaths each year, making it risks" of workplace smoking. B r►msidwro.r*220 UM Men D,.s T.liia 1n1, 21.1f2i . tvasQr0. a J. , M Non um. the third major killer - after active The epidemiological studies upon rne,,gy921~4HpEmPPW~.A crag °'m smoking (by smokers) and alcoholl which the article was based are believed Imm, b dLha tmrJ populmm a Jas .ea of keJ.ad k It is not surprising that passive smok• to be particularly reliable because th met 1. 19na99,/2N2/ a Huhn" Faiw MW666 me eY r-ur" ym -&-was, emus meet I tmeep a-- kw ing causes diseases other than lung generally show a'dosaresponse'effect, "misImeCCty.°..mt,AnIhb6cHnhsuX:1:M cancer, or that lung cancer was the first with hi her ex 601 a = It J, Ae4wa4p of ream tmak 1 w k,a d g posure causing a higher Lute Ctata tad oaa smolwr.AmftaW Du k. 1 d disease definitively linked to ETS. The rLtk of heart attack. This tends to show Ctewr 191434,071M a ItILATA" T, 1o4 Caesar same thing happened with regard to that it is the ETS - and not some other active smoking, factor - which is causing the deaths. The study also outlines at least five Annual Deaths Vinous Causes ways in which ETS contributes to .an estimated 57,000 Americans die hearth attacks. Active Smoking. 434,000 each year from exposure to tobacco First, the trdasportation of oxygen to Alcoholic Beverages'. " 105,000 smoke of others," Dr, Antonia C. red blood cells is immediately hampered Passive Smoking' 53,000 Novello, U.S Surgeon General by the carbon monoxide (CO) in ETS. Auto Accidents ` 43,500 The CO replaces the oxygen which is Homicides' 30, ` 24,020 Annua Deaths. Passive Smoking °tdi° Y carried by the red blood 6 w,_ ' Hein Disease , , , , . ..77000 cells. AIDS , . ~.y.... 21,334 Lung Cancer , , , . , 3,700 Second, other studies show that the Fires' . , 1,200 Other Cancers , , , . 12,000 blood not only don not carry the Radon, to nonsmokers' . , .4,000 TOTAL , , , . - 57,000 oxygen as well, but also that the oxygea Coeaiae do Cracks 2,483 soukci Cum a d , ra:m smahas w;:; which does get to the heart isn't used D%naCinef0 , . , . 1,97b outrc G,culrees 1991 rstl.111 m, Jas w-u Act by the heart muscle to do work as Heroin Ile 'sum'o d teat Norm* i ,ee us from wan e a ua ow. -A a.s. 1wu a e . e gam a tmdwy, ears, sa 199&:,01. efficiently. s. Din" wa by ■ 1 a ut ~m ct 1n1 e Third, there's evidence that EIS e e M"s ' un a 1 a u4 t.edr9 Comm 4r. Ins .4 e . us 111c aaa, krnlr rNLIL 1"1 e r . makes !flood platelets abnormally wt,ridesCOMA it" 0a ~Ai ,A°4',9e:.1% The original Surgeon General's report sticky, and thus more likely to aggre" NO be a Dwe Ab,^ Ins concluded that smoking caused lung gate and form blood dots. cancer in smokers. Only later did we Fourth, while increased plateletaggre• 1y,,tto"of Nieritio.udI'iws.iar,mL-9Ca., realize that it also causes heart attacks, gation plays a direct role in heart at- Ca Mdp,.ae,oe,x.Wan,AJ,tr,PP vs,9s,va" and cas,cer at many other sites. This tacks, it also contributes to the develop oee;, kA leer Ywkt 1914 • MARTIN. W J. tan.ttd also appears to be happening with ETS. ment of atherosclerotic plaques, the 9.e~Y pp,Hour p.e, ar ad -W Nm a"dAswtvws We The EPA Report stated: "While this iatty deposits cn the walls of coronary Hr A d' 191' a FrU Iffl) "$mma~ report focuses only on the respiratory arteries which often lead to heart u• sex a J. 'pant d pmw onkar 64 mshvis nA 66W health effects of passive smoking, there tacks, ieeaeerr w6 Act 3 xpdsaf 1901171419299 also may be other health effects of Fifth, componenuofambienttobacco airm s*Ae&v AVK ;imr Csww-SAAXkvAA concern, Recent analyses suggest smoke may damage the delicate inner ul (in, t99s1sK Me. nn a MAYA" L C- rewuLty a Nwtmck" Poem Tnk 90akal Hwbudr herd that ETS exposure may be a risk factor walls of coronary arteries, and initiate oe s Lgtdtdt cQ6M eadp 1o ltpa hue. MA 134141un for cardiovascular disease.... If it is, or aecelente development of these Nee 19Na GMUS, ate, T6Jlfe,40 tannaa,ad Tebtae $Wlk IN 1r*0 V111 es. I ues. IA". DaOP-pmComauonmrtkt 11WO2adra. thetotal public health impactfrom ETS plaqu S.i,q sad ~t, l 1ie<.a ~ m 1m i "a " 1"itso I'm will be greater than that discussed In the next column are the major d. Alamo& ttmar/ AJr purr 1raeWd Al tit S- M 6W here." epidemiological studies linking ETS to I04essaielie ka mel, Amhaa. 9ews.r."t 1W a MILL a, A recent analysis of almost a dozen heart attacks. Immediately following °rve, WMe 1. MW 144. 611431, ~ M e. 4pidemiological studies concluded that are studies which suggest that ETS p.rm smokes is Ad.Umd W C a" LA. Ae, ETS increased the risk of heart attack ruses cancers other than lung cancer, radrm.d, 121.1718 1119 This i11 special roue of the ASH lft4imr ad Hed4 Revs. (ISSN 104690'x0), Copyrighted by Action on sawwal and Health (ASH), 2013 H St. NW. Wash., Ix 2M, (202) 6594) 10, ASH i1 a trew" 206pru64 taaotmps orpyeaios taaoatosd with the problesa of em&hiag red the righn of waswitars ASH is eariedy supported by ta:d%Nctible contnbutioor. sod mwdv contributors roan the ASH 2tedew printed posdoas of the ASH Reoirw ern be nptimad with credit to ASH. ~ OW SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Pate 6 Answering tobacco industry arguments on ETS studies The tobacco industry (TI) purports to have been accepted by cet .tr. After all, For additional information and argu- find scientific flaws in the evidence that should nonsmokers be subjected to a merits refuting the tobacco industry's tobacco smoke causes cancer in non- substance if we are only 90% (rather challenges to the EPA Repon, see the smokers. However, since they also find than 95%) certain that it causes lung EPA Report; excerpts from it on pages flaws in the overwhelming evidence that cancer? 11-14 of this document; and Repace 8c tobacco smoke causes cancer in amok- Lowrey, 'Issues and answers concerning ers, it is reasonable to doubt their im- TI- The EPA unfairly combined dif• passive smoking in the workplace: re- partiality and their scientific credibility fereat studies, butting tobacco industry arguments,' on both issues. Nevertheless, here are ASH: Many studies all pointing in one Tobacco Control 1992; 1:208.219. some of their major arguments, and direction often pro-7e causation to a far brief answers prepared by ASH. greater certainty than any single study. Flipping a coin and having it come up TI: The EPA was biased, heads 56 out of 100 tries only proves to 4uestions for Witnesses AS) is It is very doubtful that the scien- about at 90% (not 95%) certainty that tifc body which reviewed and agreed the coin is innWanced. But if it keeps To aid : legislative or the indeptenn- with the EPA's conclusions was biased coming up heads more often than tails den body in judging the dep• against tobacco, as almost half of its in study after study of 100.200 flips, the dente (or bias), credibility, and members admitted to having direct odds of that happening by chance be- expertise al witnesses who testify financial ties to the tobacco industry, come so small we can say with virtual on issues reated to the control of ull Since the more than a dozen govern- certainty that something other than ETS, and to provide s fee and mental, scientific, and medical bodies chance is causing it to favor heads. complete record, ASH respectfully which have reviewe i the issue all agreed Here, looking at different combina- suggests that answers to the follow- that ETS causes cancer, and no indepen. tions of the larger and better studies, ing questions be demanded. ent body has ever cached the oppwite the EPA says the adds of the results The questions c :n be asked by the conclusion, it u far more likely that the occurring by mere chancy range be. body Chair or u by any of ng the . the tobacco industry's position is the one tween 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 1,000,000,000. Y conducing te hearing. Any motivated by bias and self interest. In other words, the EPA judged the witness may also ask the Chair or overall statistical significance of the the hearing body to ask such ques• TI- Studies showing increased inci• studies to be at least 99.99%1 tions of the other witnesses. dente of lung cancer from exposure to ETS in the home don't prove that TIr The answer to ETS problems is receive *Do you x your organization ETS in the workplace or in public better ventilation, not smoking bans. or expect to receive any tob places likewise causes canter. ASH: Many studies and scientific bodies have money from the e dine industry, ASH: There is no reason to believe that have concluded that the risks from ETS re any other direct or so, indi- chemicals shown to cause cancer in one remain higher - even in buildings with rat describe cties to it? If so, location would suddenly lone their the best ventilating systems than we plase deuced," cancer-causing properties in another. would accept in other circumstance, " Although no studies done in schools For example, air pollution levels in and meda you believe that rcie ta - ence show that asbestos causes cancer, we many public places were found to ex• and that tobacco smoke don't allow children to go to school teed federal outdoor air quralitycriteris, lashes that t and oar smoke causes cancer where asbestos is in the air, even in the 'no smoking" sections, lung and other heal diuu- Repace bt Lowrey, "Indoor Air Pollu• es in SMOKERS?" TI: The EPA unscientifically retied on tion . , Science, Vol, 208, 5/2/80. studies which were not statistically Even separate smoking rooms don't m"pteermms, brieall ofly f dwhicwhich fine h tarzee e f f unda-ollow significant. provide acceptable levels of protection e td ASH: "Statistically significant," in this since tobacco smoke is recirculated. No mrntal g understanding and context, context, means that an individual study filter can remove the cancercausing evaluating the scientific evidence. proves to at least a 95% probability that gases, and most of the cancer-causing square 'binomial distribution,' 'Chi- phrases ca tent causes lung tauter. While we particles are too small to be trapped. ~~e ~ and sometimes need this very high degree of Repace 8c Lowrey, 'An Indoor Air supplied tether lied by common phrases h easily `certainty before taking action, lower Qualitv Standard . NY State J, s ch a total high scho ol standards (e.g., 90%) are often used, and Med., 85:381.83 (1985). tstisti s teacher] I This it a tpectd ittw of the ASH 1"okinr end HhM Rosier 0iSN 1646907U Cogrit6ted br Aalon on Smoking and Health (ASHI. 201) H Sr., NW. auh„ tK -:::6. 1:::) 01431D ASH III 0au00al 000p104t. In ra=pt ortannauan concerned •tth the pro nlemt of "mmat and the rig-., o nOmmneen, AnH ie m„rdv a•• +-+•»>,r..nronlnpinM end ernrler cnnMbutnn n-r•ivo 4. ASH Rairv 114---1 nn»Inn, of d, 4191 vlr6 erciit rn IISH. „BOSH VJ SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Page 6 -EPA finds ETS creates serious health risks for children n J, 111791 9t,"iww apomd m ahmd th"n iml bs rot, T. (I"M Irr o. pr.Nmu, ad ut" Warr d Om oaed0 Th.- EPA found that ETS causes d paw amak0/ %ku I. Ecp. CJ. Hd 4101 ]DO, m mddlt^ e..Lnpha vm ad pgWmma. Am. d3ma1 AhaaL laWTT12, M D, A a (11711 A,W"" "Wimma, n4td m I L7me4. ".1114, a MEL IA. a I (19931 N.. om-6y in young children each year; Y 161 d lam fi 4dWm cAOm 1941!0, a SO ENXEL ad ,tdddk w dt"m ammo c6Jdrm a day an. PmL+am, ■ 150 000100000 lower respin• M A. a at 490) 1,J sear' b ,hldhad ngamry ditmm. Vows Th0 anm, of ham Fos. del btm. om ssiem ,,pawn Ay tory infections Including pneu- En. Reap,. Du 111.1051100, a SOm11NG. 161. a J. ETT.nd rot imon tier W cads" (1977) L0e [ ,nprtta7 dime, VA X.*ae a 111 monla, bronchitis, and bronchi. Am,J. Epidemid. 1062711, a TAGFJI. L5 a 4L (107711Aa, CAXMON. P. a J. (;441) TU 6mM d whin' ad Ohtls resulting in of parmml "sent, wskq as this p1moa47 h,mmm of moamAad' 61&m I. Amer 4*PS51141. a COLUT, h"m Ace 1. Epd.,d llalM I WARL )19 6.091M) _LT. (19711 Anptr a y damn a chlAenl Sr, M.A. I& ■ 7,500-15,000 hos lta ifla1iOm P pads d,a'taH. 114 wakiy. ad 1.4p4a4R7 EeJa6 d Aildrm 27,111. • [OLIIT, IAT, 09741 Aepemrs rymptma a ■ 200,000. 1, 000,000 ast It ma attacks ti-iya um,o0 Am. ln. At" Di1179.561314,■ 77151, chAdrn W 401111!>mob.1 d phlap pad,mroam it M.d S T. a d (910) pa.rtea, Wham v 1410owm m ugvnry I. I1C1Y,A , a COLUY. 111 L 0 it (174) bOwaea 911" ■ 8,000.26,000 new cues of asth- natm, C4vma m*", ad bW d P.Iasaeey ILmm a 4 amkae mad wnW phtaem m ptmmma m! bo,,Lw a ma P.Pddma smplcdaLlldrn Am.InRWDa1U.H7M. avfFrLlAood lAema 210111111.aPGGUS90N, DlA.aJ. a MCCONNOCHM x44. a 1: 11"64 Immix !ache ad n"I$ Pay" aa4A04 ud Imm nw,"" dNr u the lie ■ increased middle ear effusion m=J rok-C v prmaet d Whnami a Chlfae yes d to hrm". d WeI Ipifatimd. Comm.mny etWd351104044 ■ respiratory symptoms of irrita• 19I I. PA" P.lmamd. 2149261., PAPA, lira J,11416) 11122!11 IA. a J. 49761 Wlmss d ftio (W= m ,h0 E Ara d hall ama101 m d.w rt,"M d:rse m ck"m :mddny d bus nqu, y Ar kcal 80 AM year d lira. t7On Y,-Mad 1. 171613 a 1ISGAAAD. H a at(L"A lliah It. 1. Pw5%. Mid#101!111 PID71®t& F 4 aJ,(M) ■ significantly reduced lung fune• limn fs Whavme Aem/ i1vm7 ,1.0 of 5"5 ialmm Ana 6 Ok~ 04 -dam d agnme7 Jas scow Padan. kad ,"11+776.8 GuistaPANSTM. I 0 d. rharim rand Wt ►.h.o,ens+l3n. 1013113144, ex. n J. tlon (:9171 A,Ww beam a,f Wbag hraochmt AUvu 47 6191. a (1914 erhttam6 a,th0t ad Pdnmvy dyehamemt 0 rave It also found that 'there is strong COG S721L,110&1(1"1puladamm" kmm6dq, dwat lnpt~r7apsepnalwwaahtgAtWe .d ntpr...y.daum d imLpava, d d1npY detuu, Ate, 1 214 14617469 ■ UNTAAMLO. P.137711 R,6 oodip of evidence that irdants a !luhe mothers Da C1U 42111344 • ioY04IIMA R a J. 4917) Pm,a, momw swab m a anhdiey me emoukq d th, Lie cep m smoked are at increased risk of uJhraae dwp lama d.hovolama l Adrhm, 14167719. 1ht ap d A", Act, Paedue k" VAIWI. a 912M 71. a TSDAOYIANlt G.Y. d d (1917) A.imtat W PadmmarY a IL (191) Aaaprva7 dum0 rtr mad Vd7l.mar) harnm a dying suddenly and unapectedly Ammo, d mv0d h.pmcy d ro4h asam0td Vd ptm" thlbm 0atcAst rook NO mip.ra"din. Avplr. Du during the first year of life.' 7mAwl a tamq, mW.w' F,fame 137 3 a ANDRAL, A, 121:111 a WARL I K a J. (194) Pad., mine, is m L (1"4 Symplm, d ko W ►,pa.a. "y ad aahma m to3ae, and rg0mm7 hmhk d aLldrm kdy in de "JIt Ace Following are the abbreviated cites- nLdm m arv.ammd hcmn An► Da Ciu o 475471 it An. I.gr. Du. 12,31374. a AAtrZ141AM C. et d, (1114 tious to the studies on which the SOMUVMM ada11gF.d"tooki l+dmg.a.9 I r•a.pagm=*dya'WrassAaawwr?Wwr9J coaddm in Fnmm7 ft"d cb5ia 1• rpilsomt. C.mami0 mr Idr J. Farmm, IOLKI-364, ■ CHAIN, V. a &.13914 EPA prit ipally reU4 M : wawa, IM13C, 0 AT2Arrou:l. a IL Peet RA hoore Tsl aAaael pdr, mauasim Aav,aa',p"Nswir 6-di" is r for 'dad ad nntntx W6,0M 1Aar IIV ida9ir d gmoA Am J. 13.31, Hah► 7W MI6. • call Y, m.L T mia"."Pmdw. Sad )7)11715. I ITUC H M DY. (19117 Q"re4" gdlwalgaJ why of thedms'41ohL h E11 end naAma a chltrm 09111 Day homin ad Adabmd m6mm ..tidaitm d Fad., amakwe del tLuss'e ruph+dm. 1- tab 1. ,prone d syspmmd 9,. Meal I. 291,122 tUL a UWII Ipddmid173119 • CHM Y. {3917) IyVWVW dlftt Of HA a 6L 119M Ck ma Cmatk N 4 hmpmi P.Palaom m padm moYmg ad an," laa8m1 m ►ogiWiamoaa It. 11.'ACS6TFID. CM. a J. 119IQ Fad" cookies is d.U6" rdddmiip is m," mad ddme is ham ddisor Ash. Da Ladd. rupow, a1W is "fly CU3400L Chad "1006100A 1 r,TJmay mondnmm eel pdmme7 hAmrt4m m TK mok 64Is"1311 a NELVIZZ. DA, a d 159091 hrmnl maakiae MeCONMOCKIL RAI, a 1(1"4 Paced mJine. paso0 Mvh j, Am. An. Argo. Du.151961171. a 1YA6N3, D, 4.1 AM Pm„aJm7 whrdy a ehdirma Prapvu+ whoa aids. d tar hhkte. ,d kmily basso d pahm, W~ rah d (1911 T6. impn d pow 10161101 0 4m01m7 rmm ,aim Am, J. P,Ma Hrakh h161V1. a CHAN. X.N. a I (I M.1 bmsid6et An. 1. DA 4ad 1390111 • OOSTON, r A. d" ma thw"",au" Ace An. As". Da 011N•Sn, Fit"," t symptom, aek4dr" of I" bmhw"It Art1 Da aIt0"7) Ametmm of dw JimamaF ad rmWmay illy a O'CONNOL O.T. n if. (11171114 drla me palm esASmp child, 6412% lX4 , mesh Wrul wokag eel a6s es,5,omm al GdoM 1. ca pJmmv7 Nccv 0d amT-Ja krmteW ngoetamem EpidmroL C<maamy H,"411145, 1 ANDFASON, Ll. K 141 p tte,a bad amp, d thdin dd rwas aJJtL Am. ETS End Middle er dams N thhdrm J. (t"4 Dian ear ammd.medml hege7mlfoa h0 Nvm In. Adger Dit 139.100404 0 MURRAT. Al n A P",, PM apaersamt Asim PeiOrdn UJWNI. a •OOD WARD, an r&,, h ,ahautri a e.w dale sa 1np Jm a, p,mN WO, 04 m J. (7972 PWWW mmAad 11"se ""ttes ems A. a ,L (I"C) Ant m9wro m, &m is A&" and moon ,ham m rou,,ar 4hdim r dek ict 1401457. a eel W.W0 m7 m Cud= ) rpidrmid Came, m Hrahh ties I04a1 mmdir. thr."W d pd" ON64 1 1P;damdAAIYIANO7'SKI. M. n J. 111101 C116.4 1eapaatl7 "'.t0 1211.101, a IVUSM M. a AL (1914 Md& W dh-s- ,d Casnow Hnhh 44 w-L* o woOOCOCIL Al. a d d 'a" fi".Idrlyd, upmr,. taavom, Am 521 V 119 1 .he dmw mrtrmmmt Arty Esm em Haakk 40.1441. ■ (1"4 T61 dewlgmr d hear Face" N hebsey Ace" jHrXMAN, C.A. m d, 13 "Cf EOIy childhood pnkctan of XRAEMt& M 1. m J. ("5) Raft Mon for P"01me m AdM INmb at WWOWY loam 4d mmahA A 1011" why la. .rth u Am. I. Ecdtmml Of IY , • ►ErrIMAN. M. n J. to dLiet, seta as" 4 IL cievatr robt rapoaak ad J. Reap. DA I;p.ppp.1.117. a VWC21r, A L m eL 0"0 4990) Me "W atekmp ad eL14od Irhmt Pai.rw vVy.!AMA H970U 1039 m atACY. N. (I"0 TIM aidg7 Pdrkady d prod =064 m 4601++eel amwMdme 15!41!12 a OWIGS. M. a if. (t"1) Ammo IN" of palms d IN ear- ,u toord mdr 60 . Palma. 0101100117404. loon ngrse7 into Wo mm N AWY-S tddiser 11170yai4. ,mdJy m hee h"%ft ad ..W„ mgmdmm s m emkmai, 9111.131. a PUAANUIIL t n I (1919) Wh 9t7art of" ■ Patm. AC it J. 111M MLdaJip Mona tramp 1.Jirn. P,j,u r.lmo.a 1:10154. 1 MAPt,NF2. FD a 44 v ante M mv, wore mama amore 14500 a3 rhda tsaaaf krd0 W Aµmom m AiLkm diadd m►egmL AIt d. 4"n I"'nnd OC,fae Q( Uth," a A, d makes aLMn4.An Omlalgd 1041445.1 WtU.A17, t J. (191) Peg. Imps, Du 1466440. ,,Iw, pemmms 191121. , tHRLK 9. R. ■ d, (1911) OA60,0 pM1 tine, Wmd a wood mint, C15m Ch,A,W uhm a A W"4 cooked, Uiwn eenmad m I OadOymld 12.SI UI. I P2tKIN& DYI. a J, 4117) co ed how AmmtMa. hrom.:ln of elpmwr An. It, Artpv. D.. L455-41" , CWAd d mpp, ngrmry vo wei my m It" 44w r r.._ -r ;,,whom 41494 by ireve,mmhrd P"i n. isk ■ BARRY. C1 m J. (3914 War ea saw- eel P jm_T ttl e-A ° •ht WkemYAN ehdlm TAD41o, VM. a LL (191) yak hdqrs Is dfmaa nnermt hiadm is Pnddrmr 6",s, Aa1.Ipitima 113110-M. ..t1 md0 nyr W fox 07134 ddndal. ►wkn.la 03010. 1 "uNtai a, a J. are$) Wmr to pontiim dd its a AL ND. M a J. 09,711 Eeae d Ada„m'e del prase' a PAID, 1D. a al 131111 Hwmhdd U-629 070001 dhm, m pdoma,y halm, d I" saaarahaa ,ml CL .AA m t-nel,as srmpmmt A.rA, Do cha 11.lilli aaDtaam anik MWI, r dham, 1w M.A. 10471450. a Pads comhme and PAam07 tieam• tit L Epidrid a CHAALTON. A (11141 UWdrn', tvAeM rdm,d m Wmtd HINTON, Al. 093 "Orr to tam mail W A dluim O 1411740. a SURCHFIla D, CAI. a d (1931 Peels "Whop !cooing, ar. Ideal 1. 213 IW1449 a COLUT, 1A,T. a J ehaim std its mimme;p o Wood W01,04. 1 Lvreed dttletwi "Prawn) erdmime:d Fr7amrs bmmm to 1 V4 Aegvusy ,r,ii W .hJio km Wan -oh oe wS OwL I;1.551ML 1 Tf21L D W. a J. 49196 Ip,iamdoey d Tmral Mi kiti Ant P.n. Aagfr, Da ISL%&M, a Phaps pads Ar. M A I CI NC 1 CO111T, IA.T. n tnr rude Aanp ,h0 Fm yam yyrs d W, in Child,111 . a CHAIN, V, C9MI The dfae d put ,mmkiue m chd".4 J. (1974 knessu of 4mahiml and prod FM,ps on Irw Irony a pray w eahmm md;A. IWd D. 160 pit m.r7 Lroa, a Shvyla. Am. I. PA6 H4" 16511111. mnelmma.d WMJLW 0 Wit Aildkaod lw,01 9.1011 ICA 111A . I C43"o, GM. a J. (1919) sasme a 0►,Ifa I CCA ffoCL G W. it J. 11"11 Th, reseni d1ame d DOOGL R, (1914 T6, d:ata of admits p-00im as Ariom, aiamtmoo ooh ngm07 treads, ad pad" ,mch" k. ho m" oPSm, a eA.n m0h4 W so dokae. Ace An. dhldrn. Any 1-44 KHM 3101'195. ■ All I, a J, Md 1. 1",1111.1494 a STVACHAN, OF. n d. (11M P.dv Aala. Dr Us 10.141. 1 OODpL, 1. 11"31 The set" of 11++91 AeLemaim d prmtd amAOl ad t0 taA,np 1, "A,$, 1Wnr7wawaCmmae,ome ad 014" r,9edm whom p9aw m Arumw Ck,Mra Av1 Lam- HWA ,.gvva7 dvre0 m,bj&m,.ba 14m1AM. I RA5VGA, H. ,a7,m tie Ailim Ar. M.i 1.1"3 M1HU. I TAAAIARA. ?hit is a tpeeial ;eve of IM. ASH Srtakdt end Heald Jte"m RSSN JN64KrXe). Copynthted by Action on Saito" diesel Health (ASH), 7011 H $t., NW, Wash.. DC ;t7 nC ;H i, 1 nlnonJ 0enpr0Lt. ta<,eutpt orgm Utiod concerted with the pru'Dln9e 0111110kie1 end the MInts of nan5mckmn ASH is munly 4uoeontd LV to4edon,Me mntrlb.tloru. and rmulu cantnbdno restive the ASH AevirM Printed Dom em of the Aiq)te*w en be rtontited with emit to ASH. i ,.,~4SH SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Page 7 III .0.19 a Ix` E " K.U4.4&P 01 9oh,n1 u d In r mlw 11. retauwn dm a,h3drm. ,t Loves CSm'' The courts protect children from ETS 14 M1461 • ELMS, aG a 11 (1915) Efts" d pan .what m h." d ch,Mrm Ea, 1:"hh hnp.n 6211t291 1 H435r2A1AD, Y. n 1 (1"1) Wd Even prior to the release of the EPA revmmwul dn,emasu a hAi f+C1»a r dulci a. Am. Rn. Aew D. 121.a1,e1. a RAUrPAIAM, A a I. (1910 Report, courts in Illinois, Louisiana, "The controversy over whether Id p.mn m,awe a the bore .at s vk Iota Ar Michigan, Missouri, New York, Penn- smokers damage the health of peo- alms A. kaunuaa M I. Epidmmol I1716"lo AEWrNM M." J.(1914) The Idastg of pun mail s' m Sylvania, Tennessee, and Texas have all pie they five with has found in way p4owpv, mocuam h stud, d US1 of" aakme Pre. Mei considered the harmful effects of sec- into child custody easy - and 11,65&41. match. 1~ u X DG. " r. u"n sped miA.S" that's bad news for. smokers.' Ira WM. MD, 4914) ThLiames e off" d fvmam,d%be.. ondhand tobacco smoke on children, Mucus, "Parent's Smoking .poure %W lm ■.a m dear Im9k Aar tots, r With new evidence about the extent of g amhaat and sa,ahm,ae Imam Eu, J. later. Ds. the dangen now available in an official comes !.rue In Child Custody U1:31OL.95. a L OVrTZ, MD. a d. 0970 R„pin,9rp government report, several trends al. Cues," Wall Street Journal, 0014. a SCH11MG, J ~aLIII Ol7Plus&&he. Chem ; Iuscti, ready underway are likely to accelerate. 10/18/90 "'pe'''en Im.a. ad swk,y " (..Sea Am' 1. Epdtm;d. ETS AS CUSTODY ISSUE a24:11 , 1 TAGEA, is a J 41 9n Eller of pv.atd 'Parents who smoke in front of cVartna mak.q es the pd"mva lum"a d rhadem. AM With the change from 'fault"to 'no- epidmtid. u01}21. a TAGEA LA. a A (1NS) tega.Lad fault' divorce laws judges no longer are their children may get burned in Peal/ of th, all "d stated mahimt a psk m v7 l he child eustod r.sia,mN.raE1, Mmt N"PlinI.0 rA*DQN, 01. a able to simply apply mechanical rules y and visttatioa dis• A 0914) The UCLA papeslaam iifia of rh,ax dmr.mn and award custody to the party found putes.' Dumas, "Stroking Could r„pteicn 60.20 vT. R.Ta0ad wp uses pvmul molun, .eta al Become Custody Battle Weapon,* u , Imp ,uet m An . Am Rase Du11919119!, not to be at fault a VIDAL Al. " A ono Leh (u an IN ehJdkmd Similarly, the movement towards LAwyen Werlis'y, 6/24/91 tmpiroury dear, As. Re Aapi,. Di,. 1*117412. a WARP- I hL a J. (1914) Pmw .L% am m9h a6 ad axi on sexual equality means that judges can no hdeh d Diadem kmat i4) u uma Ant An. R,.w. Du longer assume that a mother is always a "The Trial judge found that the 121-W74, I *PIS& S.T. a J. (1911 Perawm wins m failure of the mother • and rand- rdaim to rtwuee9 Jima rilw m maL4, and knl d better cue provider than a father, and g pulmeser,6 nts,WGpW.I°m'mpped&WmA°Rn fathers are increasin seeking cvstod mother to discontinue smokin Reapv. Du 12LN7.707, a talrrrl„ IA. a 41, (t91a SmJI B1Y Y• B ,mWm&rehmasa.m,md., a,mmnpmpm.dmt"bmm Therefore, more judges are facing when recommended by the cltild's mo4N ltst1j. area 14)`7'4)71, a CICONNOA O. r. m el. situations in which two parent;, both physician was stroar evidence of a It"n The drat of pans mduy m relmmm/ Assam ed .wmkekrmrs;da.apm.,+misIPwlaesSawa.&* apparently equally qualified and with- lack of proper coneesafor the wel• ,ruts and part A& Act Ree. Rays. D" DIjXsar out any 'black marks' such as problems fare of the child A9bolated cessa- a Vlfow Tr. MD. a A 0117) Laetadiul audy of pdea.n koct9a devel"atISAU6h el Wes Ism ad with illegal drugs or alcohol, are each tion of smoking might evidence a aelp ad.Ahaoa Asa An. Raper. Diet 11140175, a seeking custody. daire for the custody of. the child T9MOYLWS. G.v, a LL 0917) AAaSim is 109101110 rather than concern for the welfare ku ad wruadfiawonof ta9thase,"nabPut" In such cues, the danger of exposing m,Let r ueaap ashlar Padiavin 15131A a the child to ETS u more likely to be a of the child." Mitchell v. Mitchell, AAWMANrr, r It aL 0111111111) Pat" lease aimed s * 199! WL 67674 (I'eaa.App., 1991). warm a t)A*w .tad so testa radio beem the PAAAC factor in making the determination. rpam1dge suds. As.1' Ep,d m aL 12p11ri12n. a CHAN, Several courts have now ruled that it A.M. a J (19115) Lunt tmmos m til'de' d its h -Lelld A"h. the ado 64 12F11p1 1 cgLrnLA, L m J. O9Pe9 is a relevant factor which may be raised It"Pruen he'hs 01 t6 t'ale' m t mew e a by the parties and considered. issuance of such orders. See Roofeh v. P91a1nea d Desch eh,1" Am An Rew. D" Roofeh, 525 N.Y.S.2d 765 (Nassau Cr 14tan.1171.■snucHAN,0s.aeL(IPPPTWmameup At least one court has gone further y, d,~ d Stating that the health risk posed by 1988)• esemovAcA An. Raw Die. 141:10-11L 1 MARTOOL?D.0A (11117) secondhand smoke in the home was a LOSS OF CUSTOVY latesad . . acense of aahm. Y ttddrm d aeokist 0mhera factor that "must ho romidered, 1i In extreme cases, custody may be lost t mmrm. e9.l26 , would alcohol consumption for exam- over the issue of smoking. In 1989 in ple, when viewing the suitability of a Denton, MD, a judge placed a thre& num A. a A (1914) The ttlosombet at Usual and household environment in which a year-old girl with severe asthma in a ,Pws0"NS to aA'i is ampeciallinch ~faveciaVA child is to be placed' Satalino v. footer home when her parents contin- d<r erada0s a P104mlt" t1. As 1. IN sae Satalino,No. 11440.96, Nassau County, ued to smoke around her. '101207.1110. A APAGMAN, As a d (L970 Adesomi p of NY 10110/90. In the Mitchell case noted above, iii, uu UVAL MAIN " K a a l1 'm s ~t COURT ORDERS custody was denied to a mother who d"A ryebems "'A (meat Pdtm. Qhdd 11.40.411.' In addition to denying or limitin had previously smoked in the presence MAUOT,MHaeLA9lnn,mt.umdmawJmaet upon limiting of her child, even though shehadsubse• mth ata ad uwe of saw do k. As t. EpdeO,A lit W115, visitation rights based the concern 6 MOP!MM. H. 1. a J. flnq Kish I Is Sena Rated about ETS, ud es are also rewin quently stopped. the Nrb*Q Yana of ck" Hahn and Ham 01"Ivesest I B B B MDr'trims Iteimidgvd So*. Ana 141, A"L Sri. increasingl) willin( to issue court or. '110.x,' 11AGUMD,I aA0H0,r2tuam amokallua den rohibitin exposing the child to For assistance in raising these isruts "a Settee see add" Nlaa emb e mm" a "sJAwAtrmd P B legal dlri less. have 0(ad1 Act I. hista Hah1 W SL ■ MITCHUL IA 0 J . tobacco smoke. This is true even PrOCee47, plan your (IMP K.Pou ham ae rvl sv of Ae Nt. Iedadat deuh where a statute does not authorize the lawyer contact ASH's attorntys. .ref,. ~ 2 lfea I. ia:14 This is `.penal iwe of the AN Sa m nt ea( Nm7s►Rrsiees (ISSN 1046907)(01. COMithW by Action on SocISIM And Health (ASH), 2011 H St.. NW. WuL. Drr "001, (202) 159.1)10. ASH IS 1 eleaord wopsoft, 1Aa411rApt orpaiuion eaareraed with the problem of usokist and the rithm of oom hem ASH 11 sourly tutooned be tmdedumble eontnWtioeu, and retinas contribaton receive the AMeoirse printed cortionu of the AW Promer mar be rammed with creel i to ASH. i i i SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Pape 8 --'What others are saying and doing about ETS Feilcounting t Sparks Antismoking "Employers that continue to allow tiffs' Suits May Prod smoking in the workplace, even tinder "The lieu is one And-smokers u SmokIag .The the most restrictive circumstances, may Promise an AN-Out War This ting mainly on plain. be more vulnerable than ever to litigs• Yeah andThey're Going After ratherthinr tionbynomsmoken,' EmployeeBenes Restanramta -Even before the esses to ban smoking fit News, 3/93. EPA declared secondhand smoke a on teir premises, Lad the lawyer Class A ~eiaogen oloag with are eager to comply, As it result of More and more the owners or opera' asbestos And beausu - the nation. the EPA's report linking 'passive' tors of public facilities like the Orioles wide movement to ban virtually all tobacco smoke to lung cancer And are sending tobacco smoke the way of smoking in restaurants had roared other ailments, a new wave Of flaking asbestos - and for the same to a blue. Three-year; ago, only tobacco-related lawsuits is likely, 'euon, It kills innocent people," three localities had outlawed smok• legal specialists say. These are Baltimore Sun, 1/10 iag, tither in restaurants or all expected to include workers' com• workplaces, By (1/11931 the total pensAtiorsclaims find) damages suits When I learned that secondhand was up to 47 (ioclus ing) F]agstaff, by customers who experience ad• smoke is a known Carcinogen with no Aria., Stock bridge, Mau., andMadi• vane reactions. Wall Strut safe level of exposure, and that airton• son, Wisc.' Restaurant Business, jour- nAl 117193 ditioning simply recirculstes it, f decid- 2/10/93. ed 1 did not want my family, my cw• _ tomes or my employees to breathe tobacco smoke, Ten months ago f grown increasingly restrictive in recent 'Already, 36% of organizations sur• made all four of my restaurants no ytsn, 'Given the EPA findings, we veyed are completelysmoke•free; by the smoking. , , yet (my resuunats') sales year 2002, another 1096 will have enact- will seriously consider abandoning are about the same.- I've had a few smoking for all of our locations." ed a smoke-free policy, Only 4% said guests upset About rtiy policy, but most Wall Street Journal, 117193 they expected to continue allowing of them, after hearing the reason why, smoking during the next to years," decided to stay." Paudma (CA) Res. "No one would grant his neighbor the InternAtional Facility Management taurant Owner Association right to blow tiny amounts of asbestos into a room or sprinkle traces of pesti- "If Indoor smoking isn't curbed, some tide onto food. By the same logic, 'It's just A matter of time before smok• people who think they've beta put at stickers have no right to spew even ing is completely banned in the work. risk by secondhand smoke may wind mire noxious cloudy into the alt place. It will happen in 10 years • may. up raking their complaints to court.' " New York Times, t/I be Itss.' National Alliance of Business Raleigh News 6C Observer, I/10 uo.nd them. r 'An increrir-g number (of restaurants] 'Why Our Kids Are Breathing are in the prccets of banning smoking. V ould Punish Drivers Eaferr Our Restaurant Is Now a There is not a chain in the country that ith ikitls in the Car Smoke-Fret Environment - Since is not considering it today," Nodonal ght smoking In a cu we art A restaurant concept catering Restsurant Association nder 16 would be to funiliet, we are always coecerned legislation proposed about health risks affectiagchildren. 'McDonald's Corp,, the world's largest . Pekes Diley. The One of those risks is the effect of restaurant operator, u considering ban. Washington County CPA] Democrat secood•haad smoke Recent health n'ng smoking in its nearly 9,000 U.S. says the bill wuip»rted by a Janu• Advisories have studied the effects of outlets . , McDonald's , . has been a Ley report from - the (EPA) docu• secondhand smoke arid, because of kind of corporate weather vane on meating the health risks to children the results, we have determined it is social policy issues.' Washington posy from secondary smoke.'The major, a risk we cannot aHord to take. 2/19/93 focus of that repon•wu the fact therefore, our restsursst is now a that secondary tobacco smoke smoke-free environment." ShowBiz As a result of the EPA ruling, Grey. causes carious.health problems for Pizza Time, Inc. (ChuckECheese) hound Lines Inc. says it plans to rtu• thousands of American children,' less a smoking policy that had already Daley said' U.P.i, j/3/93. This is tpeeiel 'came of the ASff Snwkiq w1 Kufd Rnfes ASSN ASH Is e eetioeel aooproEt, 10r6,Mr%O1. COPFAOW by A"0 e0 smekLR sad Health (ASM, 7011 H St., Ner, tk'uh, DC 70006. ff071 6l91S10. tneaempt ertfaivtiaa mnc4nW With the probtetas of usakiag eed aka nghu of oaaemoken ASH is eonreir ^mnnnrrl by r, rA41M'Sle mntnhurinnt, end eeNfer enntn hutan recn•e the ASH R,4w R;nnd enrtiam nhFe ASHReHeW mw he "Carved wi,A Credit rn ASH aw (J SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING page 9 o"%egal liability for permitting smoking Even without the new evidence now defense for the business. available in the EPA Report, worker Cases of Particutsr Interest Similar legal actions could also be have long been able to recover com• brought on behalf of young children pensation for injuries caused by expo. Smoke drifting up from a first. who suffered medical problems as a sure to tobacco smoke, So far, they floor smoking area into a Second- result of exposure in the smoking sea have been successful under a variety of floor classroom was enough to tions of airplanes on overseas flights. !egal theories and doctrines: trigger chronic lung disease in a Some of the legal precedents involving • common law a»dnegligencel wl.en teacher who was awarded $29,999 f exposure to tobacco smoke are dis• an employer fails to provide a rea- erased or cited on this page. sonably site and healthful work. A waiter who suffered a heart place, even in the absence of a attack as a result of working to a COMMON Uri Hreml9 Sulu III Car Apt, 151 (App, statute; smoke-filled bar received S93,000,I 11121'• 19mnh , 't', Ares elkIN Comp.r nett W A.t1. SP workers'compensationt designedto App. tetra compensate workers for job-related A Secretary was held to be 'envi• ~ GLNCL Ms uiisirDdsp"toom W szd Helios, injuries and health problems; roltmentolly disabled" because she e unemployment insurances protects could not work where she was WORRMIN'S COMPENSATION Brmh, T1m, WarW Ache" or d. C.Uprm, Wodree•t (empeauem. Appede workers who lose their jobs exposed to tobacco smoke. Her into,d,C„No rtunr.nstu»aISrkoee.M~,.s<n through no fault of their own; employer paid her $50,000 plus Tdrpbee, NM, Apse 0011141 LIII(19111 0ldckdwr, hnee Cemry (Wrvd 09121; a In the Idew of the Camprneohn • disability; to protect workers made $500/mo for the rest of her life, d MuteA W, Riukt.Oro" Worked ro®p.nrou" I .,L unable to work; and even even though she was free to work WCA Case No, Iem7:t1, a,la No 0690101, WCD No Now I J N, $044,14,17 (111111 1 in the III~ of the Compnuuoo d • diurimin ition: unfair retaliation in nay other smoke-free office,l Mary A, De.ary, ONE" eorkm' Grrrunx loud KJ against nonsmokers Cam No 154111M leis Na. D60500. DO: 1GW1, WCD Pd1 ag N•. CISI m nN 54S.Will (H1lh 1 J W A stn. N,. CISI In adelition, a number of rulings held Poiatiag out thissir. smoking was 1103 IN Y. WoaI Camp ld Du Irlq MSTLAW, M WC. bussed in one room because it ADMEN 6l,eteA 1911 a'L U:1041JeWtoan. Nat Yer% I persons who are sensitive to tobae• fie? D.pen..r d Howes Prrurunw W Denkpmru Ise co smoke are 'handicapped persons.' adveneIy affected 'i computer, a AD Lnl, Set NYJ, 1d to 0+111), R xdu 99>imeew 941L That meant that entities covered b the judge, even prior to evidence of W. (Wlaem"a Lebr W kdvmvl A4,ln C<mmuma CJelle by .401100017:, 1"011&1 , M.wclaaaTwep64 A.L)NI law at the time - governmenu and long-term health hazards from ETS, 0 pat d Act. o,.,.on Jndl, d use Depurate at tea Last large recipients of federal funds - had ordered a smoking ban in the office Ared"1 m"o° solowill Soe'd Na 01911011, oetoh111I IMIh a Virile 9. The CJpU Clew (Warkn' Ce"teauae to make a reasonable accommodation to of a smoke•usssitive employee' lased at to" A"LaNoes Nrsea 111490. Jmuar 6.1"21 , protect such people. uNWILOYMAHT INSI1RANCY, Hahmu. N,YJ Da"A Since the new Aauri aaa With Dis- Act Army employee sensitive to most of labor, FA. Rnsooo kurp. iJA. IlZU-IW. Appeal abilities Act (ADA) imposes the same tobseco smoke was a "haadicapped oDtJ16 Ada. 1to1J941 0976% 1 Man, CJ. sue W cas/.tr a. it. 6AW A Cmevue9to of ill" roe 619.4 obligations on virtually all businesses, penoo• under the Federal Rehibili• {Ip71h 1 Alnredr, V9ruplgaru ks Appee, od lot u. lel actions under this tstion Act, and his employer was A7/MST 6t, spot ell (1914 1letoY WSveehmuto sins many Y more gr required to make is reasonable Sic. AApW Na, uua~omm; c4roolso N amass niiF are likely to be filed and be p Mrletorku I. foloo"oeo nr.dopm.t D.w ew u w Its successful, Already, ASH has filed d an cammodatioa to his handiup, Cal App. M 1067, 1" Cal Rpw 916 ICd App, 104. D,,9 ADA complaint against an airport, and 1914 1 tapb.a r. Coww"Ith U000""e tampnr ADA lawsuiu have been filed against A government employee had no t'o'l," III AJd 041 W, CnrIkk I9M 'vicDonald'J and other fast-food outlets, right to Smoke, and could be fired D1XJtD,11IdArION AG!JNST NONSMO IOAk Tai W,,.. for Smoking even one el arette on A,111 Aden M Al up InU Dkna au Seto 1JC Gu 1:115, The EPA Report is likely to make it 8 soirees opp.nW e,cdm.,crrof M,rm.W,.ooW,t M much easier for employes to prove the his own time off .the jobs R Drp.room. of Far smplo teat W Harem" Pram Ca«r. GWorne Fail rmpkr.wl W Hoo.ol Camsu" harmful effect of ETS in all of the types L kyy, to Ay,lm u"ae1 klyd Dwumt PAJ 11•, r1aw No FEP4141 C8201pk 11134 1 Drplrwrm d hie of cases outlined above, It is also likely PAS vas, u wnar, Coto. Ww6W c•ee swim t.ps.r.mw a" Hmto ep Orator? of Farw Drp.nm,m d to open the door !or rea typo of suits. An" S" N1aAa I L TAN V' hMCMWWAdr SawJrntaCase Nat ESF1242co4mp.FLPI5a1tlC14IN lttorrrr FWA Cat VI" Aeaunu rAW. Version' N21641 Pit P12 41 C94"Sp, FtP I14t C94 D1n NJ 111105eh For example, a child brought into the C400ON,1 An" l.A I" A I L FeroY 9 Mar 1 Cautopp of Fns9 a Eev lao to,mea end Hm.w tamm-o smoking ltCllOn of a fast-food resllu• Srau11pw9aWU seed too puns Palo '-w. 19M 16. uol d tee Sul, W CaWaw. 0 Smoke WC,ro h•n g SWp P. Nm barely Sea TaLpiw , III?, MI AN s Wren. C1 of App Sw d Cmrd r FJJ App, L,A. 1N rant or other public place could sue the 40111006 ■ R Ptuw 9 Donate , Jr Am% ua oL App. M 1141, In CAI Aar Hl. J.e.wp 11, tells owner if he or she suffered an asthmatic Mori s7`e P Wes lard Not, • 1107l1101o0rr, UV LSO S1oi ?SHIN t Seal oleo V A m9, The vary FSDTJLAL Rr?lAaIIaTATION ALT CU11 (DISABILITY attack or other medical problem as a ApkiliessisAlliate. W P. R" 19 0NA to Wtir ,.Odd at AND HANDICAPA Phmku 9 Ofte• of PamuA M0e19 Feud M + OAar Sryuu Fes9t1~ nor{ ar9to us moth $ru m4 Pretalu S" Do" P,rfd Dnie. _..esult, In such A suit, the carelessnessof aa.Aeslto"to®tla.aara DAnartmld lSMA Na DAlHLf0001. n+Nhl Whr Utoud Sl,ta F9mr s.mmt she adult who brought the child into tIt OnladertICore of Wilmot cJn,"tP34M JAted tmp+opmem upporomry Cowposecei Apr-,l No the smoking section is not a valid legal 4M CAN, Iri7A :'.uH16, I7m. 1•hi1 it 1 lperieJ issue of this ASH Seteails seats HukAJtn=eeii (ISSN 1016907X0). Copyhoud by Action on Simkins MW Hellish (AS Ht,1019 H SL, NW, Vol. DC 2004. (2021 6594110, ASH 11 s etlieell emnprufie, tuneapt ary;aeieuiom rowassd with the pmbimll of 6moking Red the rightist of nonsmokers, ASH it ewnlY -,inonrted M taldedurt+le tnntnhuti0n4. 2nd rentlu rnntmbutnm wpive the ASH Rn49p Primed eottinnS of the ASH Rmn4W male Pe reorIATH With rred.t to ASH, W SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Page 10 SPA Report's "Summary and Conclusions" reprinted To make its principal conclusions quickly and widely available to scientists, legislators, regulators, judges, and others who may need the official text, ASH reprints here the full and complete text of Chapter 1. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS of the EPA's report entitled Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smokingi Lung Cancer and Other Disorders, EPA/600/6.90/006F. The report is dated "December 1992" and was publicly released on January 7, 1993. To receive a free copy of the entire report, write EPA, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, call (513) 569.7562, or Fax (513) 569.7566, I. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS DIM 1912; Ir-Amatioail Agency for Research smokers (Cluster 4), coupled with Information onCatmtWCJ 1916), smoking can ago uu" on the clam" siiindwities of MS and ITS ad 1. 1. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS respiratory dmoses (U.S. DHHS,1914, 1919) and erlemce of ETS uptake in nonsmokers (Chapter Sued on the height of the avadable icienuGc it a major ruk rector for heat dlaeue (VS. 1), is wificient by Itself to eassluh ETS u 1 evidence, the U.S. Environmental Protection DIMS, 1913), In record years, then has been known human lung cucutogen, or 'Group A' Agency (EPA) hat concluded that the widespread coxes that nonsmokers may ilia be at risk for eueinogen under V.S. EPA's cardtiqu clusi6cr exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) tame of these health effect/ as a result of their tion system, In s"tion, this document concludes in the United Stun prments a serious and expoiun ('passive smakinj) to the tobacco that the overall regalia of 3:spidemialogic studies substantial pubitt health impact. smoke thn occurs in vinous environments occur on lung cane: and passive smoking (Clupur 5), pied by smokers. Although this JETS it dilute wing spousal smoking as a surrotaa of ETS IN ADttLTS: compared with the mainstream lmoks (MS) exposure for female n"st,tmolen, s milarly inhaled by active makers, a is chemically rimalsr, justify a Group A tlaud6cation. a ETS b a human lung carcinogen, responsible connning many of the tuna nrcinogenic and The weighi-ofevidenca andytes for the tied- for approximately 3,000lung taxer deaths snnu, toxin gene, cancer respiratory effects are brad primsrily on ally in V S, nonsmokers. In 1910 the Nuiorul Research Council (NRC) a nviw of epidemiologie undir (Chapter 1). and. the Surgeon General of the U.S. Public Mon of the endpoinu examined are respiratory IN CHILDFFN: Haggish Service indepetde sly sussed the heslth distortion to children, when parietal smohlng is effects of exposure to ETS INIt 19864 U.S. used as a surrogate of ITS exposure. For the ITS exposwa is cawalfy associated with an DHM, 1916). Both of the ItH his ono coaduda nonnxer respiratory effects M lawmaking .Acreued halt of lower respiratory trot infeoions the E'TS eta cause lung unear it adult nonsmoh- adults, most studies fwd epousd smoking as to (M) such u bronch@u and pneumonia. Thu an std that children of parents %%a tmece have exposure surrogate. A Causal artociuioo was report estimates that 150,001) to 330,000 cum incnaad *ueacy of respiratory symptoms and coorhded to exist for a number of respiruory annually in infants and youti( children up to 18 acute lower rerpjraory trw kWj ices, u well as diwrden when there was sufficient eonailum months of age are annbutWe to ETS, evidence of reduced lung function, evidence for a biologically p1suaible usocis6on More ream spiduniclsigie studies of the with ETS that could not be esrplaiosd by bias, a ETS expoturs a causally associated with its potemial associations becwero ETS and lung cod(oundial, or charm. The fan that the data created prevaleret of fluid n the middle ear, center in nonsmoking lulu ad between ETS but consists of human evidusa from tctual tympnoms of upper respir coy truce irritation, and narmnrer +pirodry 49ku more thus envirotuneaud exposure levels gives a high degree cd a amal but tignifinm reduction in lung double the site of t!r duabare svailtble for of eodiAgUia ins this toxiwiea, Whom there function. analysis from thm of the 1916 re"ru. This EPA rr suggestive but inconclusive nidann of uwal- report critically reviews the rumen database on ity, as was 0W cast for asthma induction in d4 a ETS exposure is aulally ulocuded with 1dd[~ the rmpiratory health effects of passive amok:p data, ITS vu concluded to be a risk factor for tional episodes and increalt d severity of tymp. these dots are utdiud to develop a karard ideatifi that etdpoim. Where data were incenairum or toms in children with utheu. Thu report titi• caian far ETS sad to make quantitative estimated inadeguste for evaluation of an amaeiaion, as for in use that 2oo,ow to I.000,0t0 asthmatic children of the public health impacts of ETS for lung acute upper respirstory tram Woodside and waste have their condition worsened by exposure to cancer and various ether respiratory dim". middle our infections in children, to conclusions eT9 The a.ight•of-evidence analvaa for the lung ere draem. comer hued identifieatiaa it developed in amor• This report don has atumptsd to provide a ETS exposure is a ruk factor for xr cases of dada with U!, EPA's GiA"nr for Gninom atimaee of the exam of the Public la"M ltd- uthsns in children who have not Previously Rla6 Asseema m (U.S. EPA, 19164 and established pan, when capvvropnate, in unto of trumben of daplayed symptoms, principles for evaluating spidaniclogie nudist. ETTttenbutable eater in noamokir4 tubppooPulw This sna(ytu Cansiderm anlmel biaraays area tioat. Unlike for qualitative hared iderdifmtioa 1.1. BACKGROUND genosaxicity stadia, as well as biological meawe• useammts, when Wannawd from many Tcbrta smokiest her long been recontited me nu of burned UM Jtsof tobsecosmoke eomoo• sources adds to the confidenm in a weiolta6 ie g., U.S. Department on Health. Education, and menu and epsdemiologe data on active and Festive evidence coaciussaA lot quantnative rule aete,Y Wdfan (U.S. DHEWJ, 1%4) u a major caste of smoking. The availability o(sbursdam and conks menu, the utefulness of studies usually de"dt mortality and morbidity, responsible for an tent human data, mpenally human data at usual on how closely the study population resembles enknated 434.000 deaths per you in the United environmental levele of exposure to the 1pes5& nonemokdng togmene of the geoid population. e.nm (Content lot D' tea Control (CDCJ agent (mixture) of cotmra, allows a hoard For lung cancer enimna maag U.S. nonsmok. X110. Tobacco we is known to cause M ur at identification to be made with a high degree of en, the nabna rid epidemiology debars of ITS lanousnut. in particular the lung (US. Depart- certainty. The conclusive evidence of the doe- and lung cancer among U, S, femalenevte'smolun mein of Health and Human Servces [U S. related lung urcinogenuty of MS in active was considered to provide tM wort sPPropnute This is s special issue of the AW S x is1 real Jleefd Renirr (LSSN 1044- x01. COFyngked by Andoa on la oklwg cod Halth (ASH1, 2013 H Se, NW, Wesb., DC 10006, (101) 6594310 ASH It s eanoexl aosiprofin, tuctempt argu talon aace ad with the problems of smoking add the hou of ocasmoken. ASH is enturdy supported by uxdeduct,ble eootnbutiom. and regular eosu7bututs recd :a the AN Prom Printed waniom of the ASHRevkr may be reo•;med with credit to ASH, W SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Pam ..timrtiaa, from three U.S. epidemiology, 1.l. PRIMARY I INDMOS this range is medium and is dependent an this dies, a pooled relative risk estimau was ceJcu• A. Lung Cancer in Nonsmoking Adults conclusion that ETS it a risk factor for uthms iated and wed in the derivation of the population 1. Passive smoking is caudally usociatd with induction. risk estunates, no large number of studies lung caner in duly, and ETS, by the total e. Passive smoking has subtle but signaficant available, the generally consmoot results, dad the weight of evidence, belong in the category of effects on the respiratory ht& of no loi condition of actual envlrormeotal levels ofexpo- compounds daesifedbyEPAIsGroup A('Known aduhs, including toughing, p egm production, sure increase the canndence us these estimates, human) carcinogens. then discomfort, and reduced lung function. Even under these circumstances, however, ureter. 1. Approsimately ),000 tung cancer &%the This repon slao hea reviewed data on the tainties remain, such u in the use of question- per year among nonsmokers (ruver•sroken usd reiuionship of matental smoking and sudden nairte and current biomuker mew,roaenu to former smokers) of bath seats us enunnad toie itdonn death syndrome (SM, which is thought satinets pan exposure, assumptions of exposure. rnribuuble to ETS in the United States. While to involve some unknown tespintory pathogere- response linsuiry, and esnrepolnion to male then us nati t" and modeling uncertalntue in sat. The. report concli!es that while there is nevsr•amoksn and to n•armakon. Still, given the this estimate, and the true number may be higher strong evidence taim infants whose mothers smoke tfength of the evidence for the lung cucnagerue. or laver, the assumptions used in this analysis are at an increased risk of dying from SIDS, ity of tobacco unclue and tau extensive human wouidtend tounderutimate the actual Papal vion available studies do not allow us to differentiate database from actual envirosmeaul exposure risk. The overall cenfdeKa in this estimate is whathes avid to whet eaten this increase is reLtd kwefs, fewer dassumptinns are neuuuY than is medium to high to in ueero venue postnatal exposure to tobacco usual in EPA quantitative wk useumeau, and B. Noenoncer Respiratory Diseases and Make prochAcm Coruequ rWy, this report is confidence in these estimates is rated medium to Disorders unable to users whether or not ETS exposure by lgls1. Exposure of cl • Aran to ETS from polar, itself G a risk factor for SIDS independent of PoptdaticaestimnnofE7'SlsealtJtimpact+sea tJsmoking is cmildly usocinedWith: smoking during pregnusry. Ragas g an also made for certain romancer respiratory m, increased prevalence of respiratory Association of parental smoking with either upper endpouus in children, specifically lowerrespirno- symptoms of irritation (cough, sputum, and respiratory tries infections (colds end sort thrau) ry true infections (i.e., pneumonia, broaehita, wheels). or acute middle ear Mfectlons in children, this and bronchiolitu) and episodes and seventy of b, increased prevaenu of middle car effu• repon rands the evidence inconclusive. attacks of asthma. Eitimates of ETS-annbuuble Iion (a sign of middle eu disease), and cur of UU in infants and young chadrte are C. a smell but natinicaBy signi5cent reduc• I.J,S. ITS and Lung Cancer thought to have a high degree of confidence ion in lung function u tend by objective mea, 1l,1.L /fr+l llenrifioetfw because of the ennsinem study findings and the surer of lung capacity, The Surgeon General (U S. DHM, 1919) appropnauncn of puentel smoking u a svrtotate 2. ETS exposure of young children and estimated that smoking was responsible for mere measure of exposure in very young children. particarly Wants from parental (sod especially than net of every six deaths is the United Starts ul Enimaa of the number of Isthav is children mothers) smoking u ewu11Y associated with an and that It accounted for about 90% of the lung thou condition u sggrovsted by nposun to ITS irtutasd risk of LRle (pmlmottfs. bronchitis, and cannot deaths in males and about 10% in females us leis certain than those for hale because of bronchic its). This report inimemr them espomn in 1915. Smokers, however, are not the only ants different measures of outcome in vanaus studies to ETS contributes 150,000 to 300,0X3 M exposed to iobacco smoke. The sidntrearnsmoke and because of inereold nnrsparemid exposure to Ineually in infants and children Ieu than (SS) emitted from a smoldering ciguene between ETS in eldet children. Etimnr of the number 11 months of op. rasultlrg in l,SM to 15,000 puffs (the main component of ITS) has been offlowcues of.,%Ema inpreviouslyarymptomn• hospitalizations. The onnfdenee in the estimates documented to cone m virttully all of the lima k childien also have leis confiduw because it of S RIm 6 NIL Increaded risks for 1JUs continue, carriaopnie campourds (known old swpectrd this time the weight of evidetw for uthmn but an lower in magnitude, for children until human std animal uninopns) that have been induction, while mggesdve of a quad as ocurdon. above age )I however, no animstes an deeivd for identified in the mainstream smoke (MS) inhaled is not conclusive. children over 11 months. by smokan (Chapter Expmureconcemntions Man of the ITS population impact edtimatr J. L Exposure to ETS le cawally usoeuud of then arcinogens to pudiw smoke" us van- are presented in forme of neon, which are with additinml tpirodr and inatsasd severity of able but much to wet than for active smokers. An thought to reflect reasonable wumptions about asthma in cMcL-m who already have the disease. flu" cancer risk from passive amo'•dso, however, the estimates of puameten dad variables required This repon estimates this ITS exposure exarer is biologiclBy plausible. for the extrapolation models. The validity of the btu symptoms le epproximnaiy 20x6 of this Based am the firtaly eatablubd cauul associa- ranges is also depersdem on the appropriateness of couetry'I 2 maun to S million 4ilmnic chip aloe of lung cancer with active smoking with a the extrapolation model tkmadyer. data and 'u amijot aggravating factor in apprc i• JOWMpanse relationship down to low dos" n7hdI this reifaewn"Y an the r-4i sto. may 10%. (Chepter e), passive imoking is considered likely ry health effect/ of passive smoking, there also b. In Icelition, the epidemioloyc evidence to effect the lung ,inuarly. The widespread may be other health effects of eonearts. Recant is suggenivt but out conclusive that ITS exposure prnsnee of FTC n both home and workplace and Inslyse: of non thin a dawn eeppdemiology and inr"res this cumber of mew cast of astI m . in iu absorption by nonamoluen in the general toxicology studies (eg.Sree grad. 19921Nnioral children who have not previously exhibited population have been well documented by air tnnisute for Occtupatiend Safety VA Health symptoms, band om this evidence Lod the known $wyyling and by body metluremem of bio- (NIOSHI 1991) suggest that ETS a cposun may E1S effect/ on both the immune system Ind tune mukurs such u nicotine and cotinine (Chapter 31. be a risk factor for cudiovucuer disease. In Is g., nopy mid ainsy hypenesponsivendis), thin This exists the question of whether Sty direct addition, a fe a nudes in the iitenvre link ITS repon concludes that ETS iI a risk factor for the evidence elms free the relationshio between EIS aposurt to cousin of other sites , at this tide, induction or Istlma m previowly uymptcmauc espofute and lung cancer in the general po is s, that database appear Inadequate for any condu• children. Date suggest that relatively hi!.h levels time and whem its implications may be for public ties. Thu report dots not develop in analysis of of exposure are required to induce new easy of heslth. This report dddrnw thin quesuom by either the nontupintary cancer or this helm asthma in children. This report ealculates the# reviewing and analysing the evidence from 30 duew data and takes no position on whether previously uympromatieehildMAexposed toETS epidemic is Studio of effects from normally f TS 6 a risk facet for then tliseaau. U a to, the from mothers who smaks is Inn 10 cipreetes oawAAl environmund levsh of ITS (Chapter total public health impact from ETS will be parlor will exhibit an en'unnd 1,000 to 26.000 5). 1Secawe there is widespread exposure and rt it greater Man test disused here, new cuts or asthma Iuua ly, The conr:denee in difficult to construct a truly unexposed subgroup This Is a special have of the ASN Smolself deal Her" det4w ((ISSN 1016-907%0). Copyrighted by Action en S.noktryl W Health (ASH), M 13 N St., NV. Tath DC :::6, t::a W 4310. A]H is I oaneaai aooprouu tax-exempt orµmruton concerned wain the pruoieou of ameaiag sao tie r,gau at ooumosera ASH is t,urely %eeoned by tatdedunlble eomribueent. and rerulu ennimbutom receive the A114 Review Primed nertimne of the AW Rrdprr ww a- -innted w"h eremflt t~ 4 thf 8H SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Pane 12 1-4e general population, these studies anempt to 01 showing a statistically tltnificant exposure nicity of 55 cordesuates hu boon shown in fntn spare individuals with higher ETStxposuse to response trend is Mthly supportive of a causal pulmonary implantation am slurs painting than still lower exposures. Typically, female usocution. experiments, Positive raufu M gemotoccity neversmoken who arc married to a smoker are Combined results by country showed ustaga ~ testing for both MS and ITS provide torroborr compared with female never•smoken who are tally eigmfitant aucciatiou for Greece (7 swdia), live widen for their carcinogenic yotmual, muried to a nonsmoker. Some srudiea also Ht oil Kong (4 studies), Japan (S studies), and the a Consistency of response. AN 4 of he cohort consider ITS expmunof other subjra(i.e,ni United Suta (It stadia), and in that order of studs and 20 of the 26 cuetontrol studin nevensmoktn and longterm former smokers of tnngth of relative ruk Pooled tesults of the observed a higher risk of lung came among the eithersex) and from other sources (e g, workplace (our Teo" European studies (three countries) female never-smoker, cluaifad u ever exposed to and home exposure during ch ldhoo, but these usually showed + slightly stronger uwciauon any level of spousal ETS. Furthermore, every one studies are fewer and represent fewer cues, and than that of the United States, but it war not of the 17 studies with sespos.u atetokw by 6y are generally excluded from the analysis statistically aiglifKat, probably due to the small. expaeun level demonstrated usenased risk for the presented hen. Use of the female neveasmoker it sample site. The combined results of the highert exposure group. When assessment was dudes provides the largest, most homogeneous Chinni studies do not show am usocetion be- restricted to the 19 studies judged to be of hither databum for analysis to damning whether an ETS twan ITS and lung carer, however, two of the utility bued on study design, execution, and e9ett on lung cancer is protons. This teport four Chine studies wort duigntd mainly to malytu (Appendix A), 17 obserred higher sale, usumes that the results for female never-smokers deterooine the lung cancer effew of high levala of and 6 of these increases were statistically signifi• are generalizable to all nommohen. other indoor ter pollutamn indigenous to those cant, despite most having low statistical poser. Given that ITS expasures us it actual envi. area, wh ch would obscure a am alter ITS effect. Evaluation of the total study evidence from ronmental levels and that the comparison groups These two Chime studies do, however, provide several perspectives leads to the conclusion this an both exposed to eppreeiabte background (Le., very strong evidences on the lung cmi agen c ty the observed uiDdauon between ITS exposure nompousal) ITS. any excess risk for lung cancer of there other indoor air pollutants, sfuch con- and increased lung cancer occurrence is not from expoure to spousal smoke would be expect- tma many of she same components is ITS, utnbutable to Chan". ed to be small. Furthermore, the risk of lung when mule are combined only for the other a Bread-based evidence. That 30 stud es pro- carer is relatively low in nonamoken, and most two Chinese studia,theydemonstrate sustaticel• vide data from 1 different countries, employ a studies have + Imall sample eiat, resulting in a ly significut association for ITS and lung eancer wide vinety of study duipm and protocols, and very low statistical power (probability ofdetecting The heterogeneity of observed relative risk are conducted by many dfferut raeuch teams. A sett effect if it exult). Besides small sanpfedre estfestaa anang countries could result from Results from all eountna, with the possible and low incremental exposum, other problems several Canon. For sample. the observed differ- exception of earn areas of Chfaa when high levels inherent in several of the studies may also limit ences ray reflect true diHerenua an lung cancer of other it,door ter lung cueinapce wen present. their ability to detect a possible effect. Therefore, rata fee arvivemokers, in ITS exibsurs levels show small to modem increoea in lung came report examinee the data in several different from notupousal Miln, Of in related lifutyla moauted with spousal ITS exporting. No alter. }.eye. Afar downward adjustment of the relative chrectmirtiet in different countrese, For the time native explanatory variabla for the observed rob for smoker misclusifiution btu, the etudiea perod in which ITS exposure was of intarat for aaociation between ITS and lung camr have an individually assessed for strength of assicia- these studies, spousal smoking is considered to be ban fndiated that would be broadly applicable tion. both fat the overall dais and for the higher a better surrogate for ITS exposure in more across studies. exposure group when expoitimlevel data are 'trditiorial, societies, such u Japan and Greece, a Upward trend Inexposure neopics M. Boththe Available, and for exposurarapoue trend TFeo than fn the United Stres. In the United State, largest of the cohort studies-the Japarsae study of the study r lulu are pooled by country uuug other /aurca of ITS expmun (a I, work and Hiraymna with 240 lung caner causand the nnisualuchniquesfor combining data. including public plus) are pnenltyhigher, which Obscures lamest of the cuetantrolItudiwtheU.S.study both positive and nonpositive results, to menus, the effects of spousal smoking end may explain by Fontham and ass0cietes (11191) with 420 lung the ability to determine whether or not thin is the lower relative risks observed in the United cutter cam and two sear of totnrola~emonstnte in usociatiars between ITS And lung cancer. Stan. Neverthelae, desphe observed digennces a strong exposure-elated st+rirti astou+tioo Finally, in addition to the previous statistical between countries, all showed evidence of in, between passive smoking and. lung aocer. This analyses that weight the nudist only by sirs, crested ruku upward tread is well supported by 16 preponder- re ardleu of design and conduct, the mudies ere Bared on them analyst and following the V.S. a m of epidemiology sttdiea. Of the 14 erudies qualitatively evaluated for potential confounding, EPA's Cxfddine for Co minogen Ruk Aeraement that provide sufficient dace for a trend ten by bill, and likely utility to provide information (U.S. EPA, 1916s), EPA concludes that enviroo- exposure level. 14 wen ssxi+ticay sigraam about any lung earcinogenfrity of ITS. Sued on mental tobacco smoke it a Group A (known despite moot having low ttaietial power. 1 • •'!•rr•e .-rtirer•lons. Cur nudist ire aaman) nrcinoten, Tt,:i conclusion is Irved or a Detectable annciation at envlranmental ategonxea into one of four tiers and then statutes- A total weight of evidence. principally: exposure levela. %'Murs the population of mars eaBy milyoed successively by tier. a Biological platibiSity. ETS istaken up by the ried women who are lideloog isossenta , the Renal" from all of the ma ysa dexnbed hung, and t omponessu an d rtnhuted throughout gloat lung arms risk from nponsn to shelf above strongly support a causal associauon be- the body. The presence of the sane tarcinottns smoking husbands' ITS Is large enough to be twain lung tarme ITS exposure. The overall in ITS and MS, along with the ,vtabluhed ousel observed. seen for all levels of their spousal proportion (9/30) of individual studies found to relationship between lung cu ear and active exposure combined. Csrcutopofc responses its Show an association between lung Carver and smoking with the dose•rexport.• relationships usually detectable only in h gMapoeun einum- awil ET5 etpoture it all levels vrabined it xhibited dawn to law closet. is rblishes the antes, such u occuostionsl settinn.Orin veer • unluely to occur by chance (p a 5011 Wheo the plauibility that ITS u also a lung carcinogen. mental asumals receiving very high darn. In analysis focuses on higher levels of spousal expo- a Supporting evidence from mlasal bfouea;t addition, effects are hurler to observa when there sure, every one of the 17 studies with aposum and genotoaidty experiments. no Carcinogenic- is substantial background exposure in the camper- level data shows increased risk in the higher imy of tobacco smoke his been demonstrated in icon groups, u is the cue here. porure group; 9 of these are sign ficant it the p lifetime inhaluioa sudies in the he miner, uxnpul• t Effects remain after adjunremat for potential -.A fl.~S level, despite Mort having low power, monery fmplsm,rtioru in the rot, and skin paint. upward blu, Currtm ad a-mi olu i only be rather milt hie6ly unl',kely it occur by chance ~nR in the mome. There are sea Idetitne snimal nisteooned u never.smokes, thus 1n0atint the p e 10), Sunlluly, the proportion tl0/14; p tt inhdauon stuelia of ITS; however, one cucsrnoge- opponent emitter nsk for ITS exposure. The Tlu't is s soecfal issue of the AVSinn4isag trd HedakAet4ess (ISSN 10469077(0). Copvnghted by Action on Snsoldnit and Health (ASH), 2011 H St., NV. Tull., DC 11011 09.4)t0. AAH u a oao01191 Oi tuaeospt ogaruemon cunceroeti with the prooinu on smouog and the lights to nonsmokrn. ASH to murals ..'.N...... t L...... U. 011 ems:.. e:...1 .........La. are. a..:...- a..,....l...e .,x;,u ....1.. Agar A {]i A X61 SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Page 13 evidence remains statistically significant ud expected bin from mudusificatioa of smoking US. studies. `Mdutive, however, titer adjustments forestaller status and to account for ETS exposure from While there is nautical variance around all of scluaifiution, For the United Stater, the sours other then spowul smoking. Cho overall the parameters cared in the quantitative ureswent, summary faunae of relative risk from wa cut mauve risk estunate of I It for the the two largent areas of uncertainty are probably control plug two Cohan srtadiea u 1.19 (90% Vt6ed Starts, Already Adjustedfor smoker muclss• associated with the relative risk extimato for confidence interval [C, I.] . 104. 1,35; p < 0.05) nfintion bin, becomes 1,59 after adjusawl for spouts] ETS exposure and the parameter estimste afteradjwtmeat for smokermadanific6an. For SatJepound ETS eources (I,14 for nonspousal for the background ETS exposure adjustment. A Orme, 1.00 (1.42, 2.15), Hoag Kong, 1.61 (1.15, exposures only). Auumpuons ace east needed to sensitivity analysis that indeperdondy venal these l.D6), and Japan, 1.44 (1 13, I15), the estimated relow responses in female neveeemoken to those two estimate yields popuiuiaa rack ntim+tn u relative ruka are higher than stow of the United in male neversmoken and ex amcken of both low as 400 and is high u 7,000. That exuemu, States and Mort highly significant after adjusting sexes, and to estimate the proportion of the however, us considered unlikely; the mom for the potential bus, nonsmoking population imposed to various levels probable range is nsmowi r, and the generally s Strong auocfadons for Wtbmt axpor ea of ETS. Overall, lsowever, the usumptione conservative assumptions employed suggest that Ircups. Explaining the groups with the highest nacnnry for result Arias no Is. add far less uncertain. the snual population risk number may be greater exposure levels increases the ability to detect an ty than other EPA quantitative usesiments. This than 5,000. Overall, considering the multitude, IHoo. if it exisu. Nine of rise almost etudim is bemuse the extrapolation for ETS is based on a consistency, and quality of all ssese studies, the worldwide for which there Lee euHicientexposum lutes database of human studies, all at levels we.ghrofevidence conclusion that ETS 6 a level data are statistically significant for the hth• actually expected to be encountered by much of known human lung carcinogen, and the limited rte exposure group, despite most having low the V.S. population, amount of extrapolation necessary, the Confidence aatutic l power. The overall pooled estimate of The components of the 5,000 lung comer in the estimate of Approximately J,000lung cuscer 1.11 for the highest exposure groups is highly deaths figure include approxisnstely 1,500 (wile deaths is medium to high, statistically significant (90%C.I, . 16012.0; p < never-smokers, 500 mile neversmoke s. and 1,000 In For the United States, the overall pooled forme smokers of both sexes. Mon females are 1.5.1, ETS and Noncancer Respiratory Mar- estimate of 1 51 (seven studio, Cornwell for estimated to be affected because then its more des smoker miedusifca tion btu) u also highly atatu• female than mile nonsmokers. Then component Exposure to ETS from puentil smoking has tical]y Significant (90% C1. - 113, 1.70; estimates have varying degrees of confidence; the been previously linked with increased respiratory p . 0.005), estimate of 1,500 deaths for female neversmAare disorders in children, particularly in infenu. 0ConfoundingeuwotexpWathewociation. has the highest confilonebecause ofthtextensive Several studies have confirmedthe expoeumand The brod-bawdevidenufar in association found doubue. The estimate of $00 for male never. uptake of ETS in children by assaying saliva, by independent inven;ptnn across srvers cites. smoke" is ins certain beaum it is based on the serum, or urine for cotinins. new cotinins trim, u well u the positive exponue•ropome female neversmcker respma and is thought to comantntons wen highly corre4ted with small- u se& observed in most of the audio that an&. M low because maim are ;seemly subject to Leg (especially by the mother) in the child's std for them, malra any single confounder Wgia background ETS exppaurm than females, prwrw. Must to twelve million American ;iWy unl kely ss an explanation for the results. Acl'usrment for this higher background exposure childma under S ye an of age, or ens-half to two. In ddition, this repo" examined powmial coa• would led to Wgher risk otimattt. The estimate thirds of IB children in this age group, troy be founding factors (hu•ory of lung disease, home of [,NO I"g cancer deatfu for former ur oken of exposed to ciguene smoke in the home (Amen, harm sources, diet, oceupatiaa) Lad concluded that bah area is considered to have the lowest see& can Academy of Pt4stria, 1916; Overpack and none of there factors could amount fat the ob dew, and the sawnptiom wed are thought to Mau, 1991). served umocim on betveers lung canter and ETS. male this estimate low u well. With refuel to the noaaoar respiratory Workplace ETS Irvele an generally compusk 4 :Hocu of passive smoking, this repon focuses an I'mi. Emierrims of Jbpleaw Ai with home ETS Ie"li, and orud'wo wing body pdemiol* evidence oppea alt since the two The iud visual risk of lunl caner from expo. cotimint measures u biomuken demonstrate rho major report of 1916 (,hill and U.S. DH515) run to ETS Sou not have to be -ry large to nonspousal exposwa to ETS an chars Ironer thm been on the potential sssociadoa of parental truulate 'v.to a signuS m health hsserd to the mho exposure from spousal wakiat. Thus, this smoking with detriments tapunory effects in U.S. population henuse of the large number of report praento an alternative breakdown of the theschHdren. Thweffects include symptoms of imakem ad the widespred presence of ETS. estimated J,0W ETSiennbutable lung curer rnpirmory irritation (cough, sputum production, Cumin smolssre comprise approeimmdy 26% of deuha between spousal tad norepousal exposes. or wheese)r ecuw diseases of the lower respiratory the U.S. Adult population and tantrums monthan By eateruien of the results from spousal smoking tract (pneumonis, bronchitis, and bronchiolitiol; orne•half tnikiao cigarettes annually (1.5 packs per trollies. coupled with biological meesummenu of acuw middle ear udectione tad kdicmions of day, on average), causing nearly universal expo- expansre, more lung contest dtalhe are estimated chronic middle ear mlectiens (predeeminutdy sure to at lean some ETS. As a blamuker of to be attributable to ETS from combined non- middle ear effusion); reduced lung function Ifrom tobacco IM06A ugtalue, cot-runt a Metabolite of spousal expoaurea-2.200 of both sexes-than fiom forced expiatory volume Asti flow-rate mraurw the tobaccoapecfie compound nicotine, is deten- spowal exposure-100 of both tern. This spouse menta)t irtcdence and p~Yvsltna of aathms and able In the blood, eahvs, and urirx of persons vertwalwraouren panitionint deprnda on exanrbaionefeymptonuinasthmmiu;andante recently exposed to tobacco awake. Catiaia has curette exposure estimates slut may or may not upper resptrssary watt L dectsons (colds and son typically beeadeeected in)0%to7S%ofrsportad be applicable to the exposure period of inure", throw). The men shoe so recently published nonunokan reseed (50% equan to 65 million Thus, this breakdown com tins this element of nu" reviewed here easuitiatly corroborate the V.S. nensmoken she it or older). uncertainty in addition to those discussed above previous conclusions of the 1916 reports of the "s ben e.tunau : i appruxunnely 5,0:: lung : ash souped to the prev,out breakdown. `;RC An,i Surgeon Central regarding repuuory cancer dutF.a per year m V.S, nonsmokers ego SS An alternative analysis, based on the large symptom, respiratory dlaeeue, and pulmonary and aver attnbunble to ETS (Chapter 6) 4 based Fomham at al. (1991) study, which is the only function, tad the y nnngthors support for thou on d-ct posted from all 11 V.S, rpidwioiogic study that provides biomuker estimates of bah conclusions by rho additional weight of evidence audits of never-smoking women married to relauve risk and ETS expoeum.yielda population (Chapter 7). For example, new doll an middle linking spouses. Use of U.S. studies should risk point estimates of 1,700 and 3,600. Them ear efiusioa arengthea previous evidence to ....,Screaso the confidence is them tm man, Some population nik trtimatm are highly comment warrant the stronger conclusion its shit report of ca0emancal modeling is required to adjust for with the of mats of 5,090 based on the combined a ca.tal usociAtion with psremal smoking This to s ipwbal Issue of the A W Sm llisg ertf lfeefd Miles (USN 1046907X01. Gapynghtsd by Aafea an trnokutg ad HWth (ASH), 2015 H St., NW. Wab.. DC 21006. f202t 6194510, A514 is I nstioad nonorofie. uxtttmrst onaaitation ctutmed with the pmblemi of tmoLnc and the rithn of nonsmokers. ASH Is entirely supported k y tndeducuble comnbutiom, tad ftlWu tootnbuwrt recave the Ai7J Aawta printed poruom of she AV Assts may too misstated with credit to ASH, 4SH ~lJ SAECIAL REPORT ON 1WOLUNTARY SMCKING Pa no 14 Furthermore, recent studios establish associations chides it who already have the disease. In addi. nom preclude more definitive conclutic u. "4etw•een parental emaking and mcmued incidence tion, ti e avidness as sullSertive that ETS exposure In reviewing the evadable evidence indicating if childhood asthma. Additional reseuch also incrrue 1 the number of mw saes of uthins in an association (or lack therm() between ETS tuppons the hypotheses that N utero exposure to childnn who have not pr-vinvhy exhibited exposure end the different noocerwr respiratory mother's smoke and postnatal exposure to ETS iympterrs, although the resulu are statistically disorders anilyud in this report, the possible role Ater lung function end nrurntn, irscnase bran. Significant only with children whose mothers of levers, potential confounding faction was chial resporuiveneso, and rnhance the prows of smoke to of more eigaretsu per day. 1t'hile the considered. Thad include other indoor air pollut- Alertic semnsation, changes that tae known to evidence kr new cum of asthma itself u not ants; socioeconomic status; effect of parental prtdspose children to early respiratory i.lneas, conclutive of a causal wocin{on, rho consurundy symptoms; end charuurutia of the exposed Euly Mspintory illness can lead to )onptenn stsuag assoc;aton of ETS both with increased child, such aslpw birthsinght or octive smoking. pdmar•ary effects (reduced lung function and frequency sad seventy of the ssthnnetic symptoms No mines or combined cordoundiag factors can mcrrueci risk of chronic obstructive lung clueue). and with the established ETS effeaa on the im• explus the observed respiratory effect of passive Thu n•pon Also summariaa the evidence for mane synam and airway hyptrresporuiveness lead smoking in children. An associaion between puentel smoking and to the conclusion that ETS is a risk factor for rot diseases for which ETS his been eit}.er SIDS, which wasnot eddrrnedinthe 1916 reports indi nett of asthma in previously uymptomatie causally Associated (LRD) or indicated As A risk of the NRC or Surgeon General. SMS is the chilclresu rotor (asthma ass in previously asympsomesic moil common cause of death in Infants ogee S regarding the effect of pasive smoking on chAdan), estimatetof popalatdomsnnbutthle risk nltih in I Heir. The cause (orcausn) of SIDS is lung function in children, the 1916 NRC and :an be cilaulzted A population risk Assessment unknown.; howrver, it is widely believed that Surgeon General reports both conclude that (Chapter l) provides sprobebleranpofestimua ,omit Form of respiratory puhoprest is Is generally children of revenue who smoke have small declass- thin 1,000 to 16,000 cases of childhood asthma per involved The current evidence strongly mgpsu es in tens of pulmonary output function of both year tae attnbuuble to ETS exposure from moth. that infants whose mothers smoke are u an the lager and smaller air pwitles when compared en who smoke 10 or most citeranes per day. increased risk of dying of SIDS, independent of with the children of nommoken. As noted in the The confidence in this range of estimates it medi. other known risk (anon for SIDS, intruding low NRC repo re if ETS exposure is the cause of the um tads dependent on the su{{ertive evidence of binhweight and low gestational age, which its obeervec decrease in Jung function, the effect the database. While the data show an effect only specificilly associated with active smoking dunrt could be d, a to the direct anion of agents in ETS for children of those heavily emoU g mothers, pregnancy. However, available etudes do not or an indirect eonuqurnuof increasedoreumanta additional cotes due to leaser ETS exposure also ill;v this report to conclude whether that in. of acute respiratory iltreu related to ETS. us a possibility. 11 the effect of this later expo. creased risk is related to in utero vents; pmmual Results from eight studies on ETS and lung sun is considered, the rang of enimuas of new expmure to tobacco smoke products, or to both, huacuor in children that have appeared since cases presorted above uzamrses to 13,000 to The 1916 reports of the NRC and Surgeon those reporu add same additional confirmatory 60,000. Funhermars, this report estimates that Caneral conduda that both the prnslrneo of tvidence su losticI s causalTather span an indis the additioml public health dmplea of ETS on Ael0intory symptoms of rdtkoa and the irici. rest relationship. For the population u a whole, ssthmatie c4&tn includes mars than 700,000 dews of lower respiratory tract infections w the reductions are small Motive to the intedndir• children whole rymptoms are rigoifiaody agga. higher in children of smoking parents. In the 11 idud variability of each lung function parameter. voted and u many as 1.003.000 Children who an srudiaofrespiratory symptoms subsequent to the However, groups of wictduly susceptible or admitted tosome degree. 7 reporu, increased symptoms (cough, phlegm kavily exposed Children have shown larger This report estimates then ETS exposure produnion, and wheeaing) were observed in a dectemrnta The studies reviewed suggest that a Contributes 150,000 to 300,000 cues annually of rang of ages from birth to micittrne, pattinilarly continuum of exposures to tobacco products lover respiratory tract Wraw In infants and in infants and preschool children. U addition to snaring in fetal life may contribute to the decre- children younger than It months of ag and that the studies on symptoms of rosp rectory irriutioM menu in lung function found in older children. 7,500 to I5,000 of them will require hotpitilur 10 new studies hive addressed the topic of puen- Exposure to tobacco annalist products inhtied by tion. The strong evidence l eking ETS exposure tat smoking end acute lower respiratory tract the mother during pregnaary may conti bute to increased incidence of bronchitis, broachiolltu, illness in children. and 9 have reponed atatmialdy signifcusfy to that chuges, but then is strong tad pneumonia in young children Siva these utnificant associations. The cumuluite evidence evidence indicating that postnatal as poeureto ETS estimates a high de" Of confide.", Then is is conclusive that parental smoking, upK illy the u u important pen of the causal pathway, also evidence suggesting a smeller ETS effect on mothers. Causes an increased uxiden s of respsrar With respect to Isng function effects in adults children bewween the ages of It meads and 3 ,cry illnesses from birth up to the first 1t months exposed to ETS, the 1916 NRC and Surgeon years, but no additional estimates have bete to 1 yran of Lk, particularly for bronchus, General reports found the Class at that fume anon. computed for this age group. Whether or not bronclutshtu. And pneumonia. Cianll, the clusive, due to high interindividual variability and theme dlneases result in death his not been ad evidence confirms and strengthens the previous the existence of s larg number of other risk dressed here, consi of the NRC end Surgeon i;eneral, factors, but compatible with subtle deficits in lung In the United States, more this 5,000 infants Rremstudies also solidify the evidetceforthe futtaion. Ream malls eanfirm the association die of SIDS annually. It is the major cause of eonduuoa of & causal association between peter, of paseivs rmoking with smell reductions in lung deerh in infants between the Aga of I month sad tal smoking and increased middle eta effwton in function, Furthermore, new evidence woes has I year, and the liA61t with mrAlrul smoking if young children. Middle ear effusion is de most emerged suggesting a suode association betty+•n well enabiuhed. E v Swpor Genital and the common reason for hospitalization Ci young exposure to ETS and increased respiratory sysnp •Arorld Health Organization estimate that more rhildren for an coeution. toms in adults than 700 US. infant deaths per year from SIDS r,.e wnr.r ce aurieon tisneui a upon on tomen,uenee suggests that the inciunce on are Attneuun.a to nuorrrtsa smox,ng t~DC, passive smokirg (US DIAHS, 1980. data were "I upper resp;rstery tract illnesses and acute 1991e, 1997b) However, this vepon eonducla sufficient to conclude ordy that rest itsel smoking middle ear infections may be more common in chat it proem then is not enough direst evidence may influence the severity of anh,ns in efuldn", children exposed to ETS. However, several supporting the contribution of ETS etpoeure to The scent studies reviewed here n.,engthen and itudirs failed to find any effet, In addition, the declare it a risk factor or to enimse its populr confirm these exacerbation #H"u. The new possible role of confounding lotion, the lock of tits of impact on SIDS. (ASH cWm beaopynght evidence is oho conclusive that ETS exposure studies showing clear dose•resporue relmiorult ifs. to any pall of this government dtwiti It :nrebri rite number of episodes of asthmA in and the absence on a pirutibie bioloticil meeis• may be freely copied or reproduced by tnyone.) This is a apeual issue of the ASH Snss" d Hem7r6 Retires (ISSN 1016.90TX01. Copyrighted bit Action en Smoking and Health (ASH), 7015 H St, NW, Wuh., DC =A. )7;7) 65;4310 ASH is r nataoaA Acaprofit, taxe fmpt organization commned with the probltma of 1moluag tad tot rights or nommakers. ASH is manly supponad by tasdeducuble eemnbutioes, and singular, eoasnbuton receive rue AYH Retires Primed portlafar of the ASH Aniesis mar be rtgriested with eredit to ASH. ~,~qBH 1 SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Page 16 -'Additional Information from the EPA Report ADDENDUM: PFRTI\ENT NEW STUDIES MAfOR EFIDF.MIO OGICAL STUDIES Several pertinent studies on the nespirnory FCarbon NFI7IS OF ITS AAIBA a aJ; U9u)Pwwaah+y sd keg Isrramoy health effects of passive smoking have Ippeared SE JAB OWNSON,RCndLLIN~ RuYtwrt1wdalor since the cutoff date for inclusion in this repon. see d y l so As t). Ipidam A rasss,. The studies are cited hen for the benefit of BUffM FA. m al as 6199) TL errs d nay ester a anyone who may wuh n follow t:p oa rhea T1m k )AAA Ma eO1fUV~ P• i L I=re rasen oum sd . The nudist w brieAY dabe ow, prnadaNa York V«ue C►aa Ieousomm L 9 1119. toPa eluN W e «d.n D+r9) t uoe correi a rsswire is Feat' and the suthon' conclusions are prorated We Toluene Kny. Ise Gmdara 1, ed Caere aaesya 9. e. err do not formally revises these etudkt in this Formald,n ,,de B sp daesq.. kntra Gus, lnlr verus." 1191ffi. report, and the citations do not represent a full Aerolein CORMA, P. n J., (ntl) haw boahiae d lute tsar, literature search. These new erudite us rall 1—. :bn.5r1. SensY Acetone F02RTLU4 [,Tdi in Ja 11991, Na.ahrl Luca raser w consistent with this report's conclusione the eavi• Pyridins easaeYue .oesa a ruluvomr w.an,rl «n,dr. C a are ronmenid tobacco smoke (E'TS) exposure 3•Methylpyridine 2pidrdd Lbomhm, Ins.. Ht1. 51551, increases the rink of lung cancer in nommokera )•Vinyipyndine GLo,Y nd..u71!Itweranesr oaaeCha.r.oms, let. and affects the ropusitory health of infants. Hydrogen 1 raxvraa>t679. Two of the new studies w case-control studies 1.ydra:lwo 0an de car a A~~wed «on oJ4 rM ~I %14 C~" 71A63-460 ~s of ITS and lung cutter in U.S. female norumok• Ammonia GUM. o. a J; (1911) a du rolm.ry bsewsa aaLee ,1nh gamine ad frma6 ky 4=W4 I.'. lmouy d haw, Iw.w kwrre en (Stockwell at a[ , 1992t Browneon et al., 1992). I so 41)416 ,tcckwellctaLccncludethat 'fon •te mt ex asurs y 'rhb.l.BLL 1 P Dunrthyluitne }rLntaLS.C.G. n Ja 11917) Mmrye r a saahr od Iona to (ETS) increases the risk of lung canter in Nitrogen arides rarar nsk, Am I Palk Hahn n 991402. woesr who have never smoked.' Similarly, N•Nitrosodimethylamuw a MOLT. R. « J; (1919) Pad" =0144 W try own, r Brownton at al. coodude. 'Oun mid other recent N•Nitrmodiethylamine a .area k saouse and 1aJri na9w h.1 Iuha w. 11"M studies suggest a small but consistent increased JANMOL, D.T. a J., (1190) Luy car. wd apace N•Nitrosopyrrolidiae a mtarae nails, a,hc li r N. Eed. J. Mod, 113O SL risk of lur,gfewer from pueiwemoking., Fannie acd 1LABAT,Cit in sl;it 9H)Lure terrasaaehsraCancsr in an autopsy study of Greeks who had died of Aortic tllHelaL causes other than respiratory duel as, Trichopou• MaKyl cWa ride RALANDIDL A. a 1.19 il" Pmdw aakiy W din in dw lase at &L (1992) found an increase in 'epithelial, 1,3•Butadierw a na~1 d hry oxen am.y .a.el.ra Liar Gwa ib1 reancerow, lesions' in the loop of ward 1.111 1. Y P PAIlTIC11lATE htATT[R RATADA. H a J, t1191) [cat of Pn«re aeli.er guy 50nsmakingwdlamwho were mamedto smak• Ni UIW rawemlermera.maaW34e .one.Gas NoRara re. The suthon concluded that their reaake AnAtabiae kU"LIt 'provide support to the body of e+idnste Lolling Phenol 1,00. L C. Ha 11L a da 11911) 101 monuments d pews U50lusive 9malnin5to lust, In a fourth e `d suntans of oaf ores rir snag eosaahane Pw 1 1 canoes. Cesechol cAir i.aJa lr.J Ciocrklas lN. study, a aa•eontrol study of ITS eapesun and Ffydnequ cons L AK WL (1199) A emle t ad rPdnr.rewt Puts as luny clutter in dogs. Reif n rl. (1992) found An Andire e a nassd hie w Hoy sane (dxwd 6m14 U. Hoy Rea[. wocisuct" between lung Casper and exposure to 2•Toluidiar tli P)!. 0!IS) Dar brandies alas pall's wbrse books us m smoker in the home far breeds with abort- and e a Iowan L. Mi J. L1h t505 15or 2•Naphthylemins ■ tlV. I . a n d4 (1911) 9aeu.1 W 91111W sir Lnas gar hme medium-length notes. row results are not I•Aminobiphenyl ■ ^rr0Kr 00,.C.".[at1.lpda.Laa.1e.11 tututically significant, anu the suthon chutt• Bmt(I)uttkracene PLLSHACeN, r a u, (!ren Porn anew sad hey teriu their findiap as ' nconrtus w.• i~ara(a ynae a sea. w freer.emaa Aa J. [pdeawL Ua(t}vaa. Finally, Schoetdorf acid Kiel (1992) conducted a Aqua o n Ji Tb nraaral stH 117 arc Y Cholesterol w .a.ally toes, olrr J. [sp. Md lMJ19.HF, I taucontrol ansl,sis of sudden infant death yButylolactone SOBUL T.u9905 Paaiw uscluae"bog sesaokwe wonws syndrome (SIDS) std maternal smoking natty qjinolw sd As ntavaoul ha.«. odor urldMda r wy warn fie., fraternal smoking bah during and after Hannan sonw ovules d, aulticaur es servoad away. Gas Ts combined txure), maternal smak• Rare ASON P9K91L1tY I Pen N•Nkrownornicotins tvlldS.AON, 0. n a. 11919) Lvy carat audyr w woawe 4 only after prtgrunq (psesiw eaposun), and NNX (d:..re.l [mawels names, 4ralda Iw.dsa see maternal mmakine. These fovea Baton coo- N•N trosod nhmolsm nee TaICHOPOVLM D. a JJ 41951 Las sew aid pssa9e . e elude that their data 'rosgen that both intra• Cadmiuma MC OPOVL S, Crnh !dL L w1 L ww Wdee utervia and wive tobacco Callow, W wodat• 2TUCJSOL D. n «i tdll Lp suwl ad pars passive Nickel a raLy. toot n 1. . G Cltr L734. ed %ith to incruaed risk of SIDS.' Zinc VU. Ax a Jl (I9t$) Imouse W sew nr (r9re for ors ADDENDUM RIMINCEI: MOWNSON, ILC. n Isobar w rase. J N«L G rr last 11(ol'4145L d, (1992) Padve Making VA Lune cancer in PolOnium•2J0 1 WLtivilLU NL Alt as J; (1911) [e.uearad ,ohraa nonrm itmg women. Am, J. %blc Hesftk 12.152315)0. genie Icis. aohe 41;,m ,Woos nLbonrlp u rpdeaudre~e PAM B arJP, .S. so el (1992) Pauvd luaokins and canine t RA Acid sot. lung weer risk. Am. J. Epid=ic:. 15S DW9, ■ G lycolic mid 1t?n.M T1 0911) The nl.oeesuy deers moWst as 4rAOENDORF, X r rel. !19921 RrLtiaMhia of W[cinie acid wwr WLJ eacoma sewy 9rwPdOq AJwebr u '.i~urou lywruann 1. l' .f O:Ja bow n to M u,r. I ruddy infant drib rynaaome to miasmal =01401 PCDDs and FCDFs GAAF11NM1L L 119111 Tlms radon loess tarrsawhtr during and !her ptapmur. Pdirtriu 90903901, a amyl eaatln W e am a boons J Nat Orr STOCRint. H.C. it J. (1992) Envinoameatal ■ a known human carcinogm, tall. 4,101611ow tobluso =oke and Iung cmw Park in noosmokins Kronfing to V.S. EPA ar URC HDUTAMA, T. (1914) Cseur aaalier is awosehwe woman. J. Nnl. Csn:r Inn. (s 140-14U. 1 0 . P gs aIsom rObae human nncino n, AjasmIrre.. MraWood. w lusbdshudaelrewls route study ams TUCHOPOVLOS, D. a d. 6"1) Active acid Passive ?raw use WAN, s 1911 ~rlimakinl cad pluhelogial in4ca on of lung cancer rash. is i9d+n1 to V.S. EPA or WIC DJpryM9llhe d W Icrlr {rll or $ lId .n a euopry audy. JAhIA 1h1.IA1r•1901. Lmmmoommmmmommomi e erw+l pgJsea r t s4 wry! k. J. 99411421. This la a special issue of the ASH Sraehing ad Messick Artiste (LSSN 10149MO). Copyrighted br Actions on 6naYdng and Health (ASH, 2012 H SL, NV, Wash., DC 1004. (202) 159.4310. ASH U a nrionsl weprofit, Laraempt opginimas tossed with tie problsaw of attwlsiq Lid the rights of eoosmoken. ASH is entirety supported by utsleduable eontnbutions, std regulac caotnbuton revere the A.flf foetdr9A Menial Portions of the ASH Armhole easy W aftno tad wide credit to ASH. ~O SPECIAL REPORT ON INVOLUNTARY SMOKING Piano 18 Vhat you can do about ETS A4 This document is designed to serve as PERSUADE effective action against ETS. They need a tool and powerful weapon is the This document can help you persuade to know that nonsmokers demand hands of every person concerned about restaurant owners, managers of stores, protection, and that there is a sound bann the enormous health hazards of being and will also be especially persuasive Sendingca c basis py ofrth is doc metro of all to prohibit smokin. exposed ETS. it is particularly intended for those with regard to work places because it of your representatives, together with a who; shows how other business leaden are letter telling them what you want done, s have a condition - including any reacting. It also spells out the possible can be the catalyst for a strong law. factor placing them at increased risk for legal consequences if a business contin• REGULATE hear attacks - which makes them ues to permit smoking after being put especially sensitive to ETS on notice by receiving this document. Regulatory agencies - such is your state occupational Safety and Health Navas :hill grandchild with as Administration (OSHA) or local health ma or some other condition making de artment - may have jurisdiction them especially sensitive to ETS Stop Being a Passive Smoker over smoking specifiraUy or indoor sir ■ see ether public exposed to ETS on the quality egenerally. Towrver, they may job or other public place You would not sit quietly if be reluctant to act unless they receive a ASH attorneys suggest that you use someone coughed in your face e or lsint. Even rhea, they may not be this summary of the facts about ETS to; Vew Asbestos particles into the complaint, vnced that the problem is serious. educate, persuade, legislate, regulate, and air, but most passive smokers' This nced that the pr that it s adjudicate, remain passive when they are cIn 51 forced to inhale a substance which is far more dangerous. As a re. D VOhe a , D people should not 15, EDUCATE sult, owners, managers, and legis• be reluctant seek protection for ~~11se this document to gain support for laton often have little incentive to themselves or their loved ono in court. ,;noking restrictions by educating your ban smoking in public places. This document will help persuade ludg- nonsmoking friends, work mates, etc. Isn't it time you stopped being es of the dangers, and provide invalid. about the dangers of ETS to themselves so passivel able assistance to expert witaesses. it can also be used'to help persuade skeptical smoking friends that your IN ADDITION request that they not smoke near you is LEGISLATE All people concerned about smoking based on solid scientific fact. Finally, if a member of your family Your elected representatives - includ• are encouraged to join and support still smokes, especially around a young ing the three in Congress, those in both ASH. A 120 contribution nrures that child, use the EPA's findings to show houses of your state legislature, and you will be kept up to date on develop. them how dangerous this can be. those on. m y localreluctant to take legislation,a dasteps you com take reports, council For mots information, please mail to ASH, 2013 H St., NW, Wash., DC 20000. This fond may be Copied. ❑ 120 Smokok" Hoskin Cars (111 0 311 Sources of Informsilon 1411 0 001 Add chars to Nleotlns (51{ 0 134 Restaurants and Nonsmoking 1111 f] 400 Tobacco AdveruN^g 1411 O 002 Hess ion and ds Gulling Smokers Smokers 1411 0140 Smoking on Campuses 1411 O 600 Stay Smoking Lava (111 0 003 Cessation 0 150 Smoking in Penitsnbarles 1311 0 601 1966.02 Srnokers' 81% 1411 0 005 Effects of Pushes Smoking ng 1111 0 200 Model Clean indoor Air Act 1111 0 602 State C panne Tax Rates 1411 010 nq aria CniW (111 O 210 Fong for Wot teit' Cornp 1511 0 603 RelaN Taxes on Tobacco 1111 0 020 W Wom orsen and Smoking 11s1 0 211 ADA 6 Senswip Nonsmokers (111 0 Airtniii4moklnq Complaint Kk 1111 7 100 Wo kolas SmoklnO Costs 1111 3 220 llon.emp+osment of Smoke's 1111 .1 More Imformaton About ASH (FREE1 cei 1 tot ok Avixen 811 (511 0 310 US Nonsmokers' Groups (11) 0 Samp* or ASH No"Istier tF111M 0 110 Smoking nq and d Apartments 1411 1 FIRST AND WT NAME J~ OMPLETE ADDRESS er11E ~~p ~,MOVYr E"ICLOSED f N1 it a tpmai it%@ of the ASH Smkint eat HMO Rn'i^ri (ISSN 104007x01. Copyrithted by Adkin an fmokity cad Htdtk (ASH), 2017 H St., Ntr, Volt.. DC the v4h~i '"try ; tH h t amonal nonprofit. tata,empt nryemutwr uncerned 01th the p obleims of imiiiumg A dJileview mtr be tripes o wldtrH is entarH. mommeel be tudedumbte tontnbudou. and reeuiu eontnbutore recove the ASMArtihm Printed po NEWS YOU SHOULD KNOW ' REIREW DAYCAKEt Almost one fifth of 3.9 distaste by about eight times, and dou• owned buildings and 1067 buildings million children in licensed or accredit- bles the risk of contracting Graves' leased from the state, The order will ed day-care centers may be exposed to hyperthyroidism! directly affect 180 000 sate workers, secondhand tobacco smoke.' 76,000 prison inmates, and 4300 hospital KENTUCKY BANS smoking in all inmates,'' BRITON WMS. A British nonsmok• state government buildings except in er won a $23,000 settlement from her designated Areas! STROKES: Women who smoke and employer in compensation for the have migraines are almost 12 times as chronic bronchitis she developed on the WERE ALL SMOKERS, according to likely to have strokes." job., a recent study by the Centers for Dis• ease Control, which found a nicotine GRAVES' DISEASES Smoking byproduct present in the blood of all of BUYING INFLUENCE? increases the risk of gettit.% Graves' eye the people they tested., Here are some of 'the many A FRENCH BAN on all tobacco orgaraaations to which Philip Moms contrib,ted is 1991. It also WE MISS THEM advertising took effect at the beginning gave money to health, youth, gas Mmyprominaatafahridashave diadfrom of the yea, A significant accomplish. and lesbian, religious, cultural, emoting, often after sufferingiuaeat". Hen ment of the ban has been to stop the educational, and other groups, for A an their nasn" utd W w which they died July 4th French Grand Prix auto race total of $17,339,134. Nat T14' Cote 43 Lamcernr b"use of tobacco advertising on the Mum WIN H Threat Ctsnu cans CIvIL UBERTIM Satre McQuaea D Lan Gent a Amer;= Cir7 La'bertles U■bn 819,000 'ion . Red Serkng !s Hear Disease TOBACCO EXPORTS hit a record CONSERN "Anmi Eddie Kendrick 31 Han Disease high of 181 billion ei rettes worth a Cato Foundation . 8 loom 40.000 Michel Iaadon S4- Penawatk fixer newly $4 billion is a Coe ruLadv !0,000 Lw!hamlet He Luo*Zt Crear 8992. Smok• ■ Heoreroatsvrioo en W~fr.... 20000 Dory Greble 57.' Iarg Casecas ing is on the decline worldwide but is WC+2n1FIfi Uerud R Muerow sr ''t..■g'Gnorr increasing in snb•Sahina Africa and a GIs. Powedadee for ovo,ew I= 6 9,00 Humphrey Sow $7 7Lo" Came Ea4ltrn Europe r a National Womm'e [Aw Cashew SAW Jam" Froieircus S7. As Nat t ORuti:ulae roe Voteam 1,000 Dick Powell S9r WYg a NOW W too Ddmae 8c Food ed 5,000 Grry Cooper 60 Luq Come ADOPTING IN ENGLANDS In ■ National Aasedrtion of Wimea , 5,000 Ches Hunoty 62: LAN Cancer England, smokers face a ban on adopt. a Nations! Foundation for Weam 2,300 Dick York o, P6Fhynwa iag babla and small children because a Meson Womm in Cooreraeaw■ 3,000 Sammy Davis Jr. 64. 731eer Gartner they are regarded as too much of a ' 01 Women Vows 2AM 2.000 With Dunay, 65d La"tc., health ri.k. A draft report from the I Wam Woman's Gour Yd Dryaw 49, Lti■g Cmoer .e b N04 1m s,ooo T+Gutah BaeLFrd 6S~ 7am+ medical panel of the British Agencies A@fORal(i Sash Vaughsm 16 t ung Cams for Adoption sad Fostering (BAAF) is a cc apeadonal DLek Chews... 186,108 Cou"a Devhurvt 67 L.ueg Goer advising that smokers not be allowed to a NAACP (nail Ltd chspun) 111,90 !tarry It rover 61' latag Caawr adopt babies under two yeah of age! f Neel Urban L (chapere isd.) . 701,430 Alan J. Ureter 68 L* Came Afro as hnnl Ceeeu . 10,000 Dad Arms 69 Lueg Cameer ■ Aasodsted Th Week Chaeui" 10,000 Nutty Wdlur Nt. LaarCaenr COLONIAL WILIJAMSBURG, the ■.Thuww usgood Gianludl SehalaesAp „ Soom 00 Dtu"r Kaetoe 70 E&Ftysens townaiud museum that recreates this As Wiena stark Expo, Ina 67,300 Churls Cocoon it t, mg Caste country's prerevolutionary origins, has a Nat Minority AIDS Coumil . , 10,000 AA akiry it, D 71 I instituted a smoke-free policy in all of ~ ~ w Thar Pekeed"207 out its more than SO major historic build. ■ ' Jactia Glen on 71 K D'u, & Cutter Afti"a American Asa PweFd . , 20,000 John Waves 72 Lung Canoit trip and numerous smaller structures! a Noioed Couadl of LA Rau 175,000 Fri Sttllivut 72 Lung Came ■ Hispanic Miry Developaur , 50,000 Laenard Basamia 72 Long Cheese KIDS CAN BUY TOBACCO at least VGankis a Dauo N s:= . of ...New Yost 3,930 DukaFlllmgtma 72' GiegCawt half the time they try, according to 0 "ud na`.....""""3)0,000 spaiiil John fie Falk 76 Threat umur is Na oed f- R a Vn vanity , )),000 several recent studies. PSdyI1lOAB~MAL• We& Ddl 77• Hum Disease Mae He" 79 L4hr was a Omar for Ptah Cownsia■ : f 5.000 Arthur God m 61: LAM Cieiu" CAUFORNIA'S GOVERNOR has f a+ Counted ethe Water Peuei■..5 5,000 rciessit John Huston it Emphysema signed an executive order making state up America ee sM Eist.."s , ,92) Beata Devil tt Semite buildinpand hogPitals smoke- Sairm Kel DeaueiO 3,00) sOURCPa An -'Dan Itelyeread,' free ' prisons, 'c"Il tsm".e wed e Hs" sir. SmokiI Educational Services. 2/919! . The order coven 19,511 state ~ bh++ +We.+ rates tads.,. sW x..a Grmr reraY tam.. ir.,r, errs, r s ..,.a n. U e,y Assn U40a44a AND HLtl fat UV" M totitt➢iln, 1Q~ A!H is roved wapdk.usama rrpaiamiaa mmyrael with tho I d Of tasm m imra.g mat st.ht (xna CCU tt am en, rd DC feooi p0a isf.gte amsea a ASH ad kith c pMrd l L COW mr6Ln eemn w w11m("L Mar-apt 1912 tai mpix spor*~F"re tY ASH t'm°61") eel }SedtA Revere. 0, Pr~w1 tartar #isci chi Mebti of I « the tY AM ASH xer ACA Of amir air u7 11 tyrueal ►aa aeries to "L om w• NEWS YOU SHOULD KNOW as I ~Rwew BACK PROBLEMS lk LEUKEMIAS DIABETES: Women who smoke 23 or including restaurants, workplaces, and A new study suggests that smoking a more cigarettes each day have 1.3 times public tramportation.4 pack or more of cigarettes a day more the risk of diabetes of those smoking 1 than triples the rick of surgery for a to 14 ciguettes.3 herniated disk. A secoid concluded AMTRAK says it has snned smoking that smoking causes 3,600 of the 26,700 SMOKING on the following services' NEGATES THERAPY, rd- r Metro new leukemia cues each year and that OF ESTROGEN England r d Ex New Haven) smoking increased the risk by 30%.1 ing to a study of almost 000 women. r VirEi"(Nan (New York-RitRich mond) nd) ~ Ocher studies indicate tba. smokin r $ SMOKING AFFECTS THINKING: increases the risk of bone loss' g V Atl tlan tic ntic (Philadelphia- Harrisburg) -Ad Smoking adversely affects both memory New fork- lilay) City) and judgment, particularly with regard ROLL CALL SAYS: 'Health cue r Empire (New YrkAbaa} to difficult talks such a driving a cu or expenditures continue to grow for the operating a plane in challenging weath• illnesses and injuries caused by tobacco cr.r use, alcohol and drug abuse, and urban DMA AND '1 AJ(JF$ and domestic violeace, Their combined FIHIOTMELSS KICKING HABIT cost today is well over $200 billion.' It appears that the Clinton Ad• 'Addreuing issues like tobacco and ministration will recommend a more hotels/mmelt are alcohol abuse, nutrition, and fitness substaatlal increase !a the federal de rooms reserved for holds the strongest hope for teducin excise tax on cigarettes, perhaps u t, Below is a fin of the need for costly health cue servi 6 much asS2/park from ehecurrent e larger chains showing es,'r nu of 241/park. page of rooms set aside in One purpose of the tax is to each hotel, the tow number of PRISON BANS LAWFULa Two deter smoking. Based upo: prior locations in each chain, sad the 800 lawsuits filed by Harris County, Texas, tax hikes, r is estimate this a j telephone number to call for infor• Tamales claiming that a smoking ban g f2/pac million people wtoillu t almost mation and reservations, violated their constitutsonal right, were quit or sot 11 thrown out of U,S..distri t court b sty' and save almost 2 million 21 ISM Legldao! 1.21 Judge Lynn Hughes: y lives- Even with the deerwe in coa• tPmtPeNStV! [06.$90) SMOKING AND DEPRESSION sumption, it is estimated that a IINKEDi A new Study has found that Additional incrtisse f3S $35 billion will bring is an 15% Clicks 260 Ut•u22 smokers are fu more likely to experi• lion each year In ts% Comfort 11031 QW23 ence major depression than non•smok• tax revenue, and save eotsntlas 5,2523 ts% EEmno t.odp 1110 42++ 423 en. 32% of those smoking more than tent of billions an dollars is 50% HooST »6. 416.7166 20 cigarettes a day reported experiene• health cue costs tad t ;me lost lot serious depression,' from work. hunP6ilcen (ua67s1 However, this is only a small soar Holidq Lm 1 son 46S4321 AATNAIIISt Male smoker get arthri• put of the $100 billion in costs 73% HodAveod Suer 24 22S54µ tit almost eight times as okra AS non. that smoking is estimated to cost u% klaSPW lohmron 363 4µ.µs6 smokers, and are four times as likely to the American economy each year e 15% Qua:7 601: 424.6423 et rheumatoid arthritis - the cri lies `eau which are largely borne form of the diseases hit g aoasaoken is the form o UPSCA2.! (l7s6vs1 hgher hei 'h insurance premiums, , Fates 246 4456667 CATARACTS: Smokers are three higher fKeral, state, and local ton Hrw :63 2334234 times more. likely to progress from tetx, and in many ocher forma, 60% Muriatt 246 221-!bpi minor to serous cataract problems, the sh'rt' s Pers tinee will 25% Radwon 2u1 333.333) leading cause of preventable blindness, only force smokers to bear ts A part s 40% sharen 360 a333s g of the cost their habit Im to% hsuffer so seta>, Reducing smoking would help slash posts on S2.4 billion a year naedad for catuact others, Lux1my(SU1141 surgery.' from You will ASH be aboout thut thug material: L Esnportane l0 i ne0°rerSMOOOT fob itia3 0o THE SSA CLUB has adopted a topic in a separate wising. I so% R,n Won 21 241.3333 policy which calls for the prohibition of fully pax and d help the to do your to do your acre. smoking in all indoor public places I , part. ASH MOST AND HIXTH MRtt aso4 Sa4"s Copy e4su6 by Amin n Emily W Hwhh uA ASITY,L,eul rotmra, iaa.mp mrwer;e6,eemW.kh,N Mommi dr~ SH V ASH SOn Ha•Nt, trL Dela"*xtnTMd6"` .oe fdr",omneunen rnon im ASH SmoL" VW HeY,A Rerfl►, rnmld ronwm d ohs ASH ller4 MAIri AS dM a/~rA,irnirinK ~~a~ rMnr"nme@d 4 rekuN,1* u ASH Cammm,ow r,lenme Mar-Apt 1993 1 A 4 TOBACCO . 6mwl NATIONAL NEWS EPA (Contfnued from page 1) While the EPA report had been circulated for a number of years in chronically 111 adults are cared for. Further, local school systepp>,s draft form anditsconclusionswere nosurprise, theIssuance ofthe shouldnow adopt regulations which make theschools totallysmoke- report as an official finding of the EPA marks a major turning point free. in the debate about the dangers of smoking to the public. In addition, the evidence in the EPA report so clearly Indicates that This EPA report was not for the choir, i.e., the tobacco control ETS is a health hazard for children that ill restaurants which cater to advocates whri already knew how dangerous secondhand smoke children and families should now adopt smoke-free policies. Uke- was but, Instead, was for the congregation the general public. wise shopping malls should adopt totalsmoke-f ree policies, Tobacco AnJ, the message resonated with the public in a way that few smoke is now in the same category as asbestos - our response thought waspossible. The EPA report has had asprofound aneffect should be just as firm and prompt, onthepublicasdidthefirstSurgelonGeneral'sreportln1964 which declared that the debate was over about the dangers of smokin61- the resultswereoverwHemingthatsmokingwasahabitthatid d CHUCK-E-CHEESp GOES SMOKE-FREE Prior to the release of this final report, any people had argued that smokingwasa' ersonatchoice' issue andthatindividuals have th tIheChuck- E-Cheeserestaurantchain hasannounced that, effective right to take actions tyhich might be harmful to their own healtH~ june1,1993,itwillln;plementasmoke-freepol'cyinall therestaurarl Tr~uchastheyhavetherighttomakeinformedconsentchbicsabout its chain which It owns, which is abou~ 190 restaurants. 1lnn thts elr own healthcare, addition, theChuck-E-Cheese headquarters will stronglyeacqurage The EPA report has transformed the debate completely. Now, it is smeoking, imately 130 franchises It has to also adopt the tots! bari on absolutely clear that smoking, including the effects of second-] land kfinng smoke on other persons, is a ppublic health issue, not just a personal The Chuck-E-Cheese restaurants cater to children and families and choice issue. This transformation will, undoubtedly, make ibis EPA have adopted this policy to protect the health of their patrons. STAT report one of the milestone documents in eventually producing a congratulates Chuck-15-Cheese's management for taking this im- smoke-free America. pbrtant actiori. Already, the public response to the EPA report has been over- i wheIN. Besides galning widespread media coverage,Xubuc STAT CALLS FOR MASSACHUSETTS TO #AN ALL. officials, fncludingPresidentandMrs.Clinton,havetakenac onsto §MOKING IN CNILtl G 1tE ~~NT~~S further restrict smoking in public places. In addition to the White House being smoke-free, local, state and fed eral officials and private businesses have placed smoke-free areas on the front-burner for STAT, based In Springfield, Massacit usetts, has written io the stAe consideration. (Src. rclated cto:tco in this issue of TFYR,J Office for ChLdren requesting that issc!e nev regulations which will totally ban smokingg in day care facilities for children. STAqT has The EPAreport endorsed theclassificationofenvirownentaltobacco s~ pecificallystatedthatthfsrequestisbasedupontheevidenceInthe smoke (ETS) (also called passive or second-hand smoke] as aGroup EPA report bn the health dangers of ETS. Acarcinogen.OtherGroupAcArcinogensinch;deasbestos, benzene, workin with the local and state ASSISI projects on this and radon, ali of which are tout substances known to cause cancer STAT is g in humans. effort and is exantining the existing state Public Health Department relations concerning smoking in other health care facilities re t - in its report, the EPAgqstattend~ethat It "has concluded that the wide- laced" by the state. Depending on the outcome of this analysts, S a se lour and subslanli al ' pub1~` healf skmokeintheU.$,preser?t~,, ay also request revisions,in tese rulatibri~o~rate~~l~ y ose fdclllHe9. I r ;w Some of the EPA report's most significant findings concern the Similar initiatives in other states will becncauraged and suppported effects of E'TS or second-hand smoke on children. Among these bySTAT. Theanalysis ofcurrent state andlocal laws andregulations findings are the following: o a ma verning smoking in child dayhlcare cer'ers and other health care ' 150,000 to 300,000 cases of pneumonia and bronchitis ASSIST projects 8 S uring the r currents particularly appropriate for annually in infants and young children up to 18 months of Planning phase, age are attributable to exposure to ETS. STUDY SAYS CHILDREN IN " 7,500 to 15,000 cases of respiratory illness in children due to OFTEN E POSFrJ TO SMOKE AY CARE CENTERS ETS will result in hospitalization. ' ETS exposure increase^ the prevalence of Fluid in the middle pebodaayryrybyl5theCen , 1943 t re ersforrts at 2ti Control ublished of the 3.9 m ion c lI dr~en on ear, a sign of chronic middle ear disease. licensedor accredited day care renters may be exposed to second- hand smoke. Of the 2003 licensed day care centers surveyed In the tract and is associated with a small but sigpniificant rreducNon in study, only were completely smoke-free. Manyy the others lung function. restrict smoking g only in certain areas and at certain fima s. " n f exposure increases the fry~.quency of episodes and Based on the findings in the EPA report Qn ETS, this new CUC stu4y severity of syymmptoms iii many of the nation s 2 to 5 million toxic second Viand mokeoint thb ver centers here !heir parent; asthmatic children. The report estimates that 200,000 to have sent them for loving, nurturing care. 1,000,000 asthmatic children annually have tt,eir condition worsened by exposure to ETS. , • ETS exposure is a risk factor for new cases of asthma in FTC & FDA RESTRICT "JAZZ" children who have not previously displayed symptoms. TI TENON-TOBACCO CIGARETTE ' The EPA repport also suggests a possible link between "jazz", the non-tobacco cigarette, which has been marketed as a sa f e exposure tom and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), alternative to ordinary dgarettes and as an effective product ~n which is the most fregderif cause bf death among infants age 1 hel In stops g, hasibeen month to 1 year. nspon that there is k no n claims. basis fob these Fe er t Trade The EPA, in its reppoort, eatiphasizes that it lacks the regulatory Inr hponsetopedthe filed bytheCoalitiononSmokingORHeatth authority for controlling ETS, but states that its report should prc~ 8 "health claims, the FTC has proposed l vide the basis for other government agencies and private agencies consent agreement which would require the "Jazz" marketer to halt and employers topromufgaterules andregtilaHonstorestrict people's obacco cigars tes an It and that It none contains no ta~th risks associated with exposure to ETS. Based on the EPA findings, regulatory actions to 8 protect children and other hlgh risk groups, such as the elderly and In addition, the Food & Drug Administration has determined that chronically ill persons, shoU d be initiated immediately by govern- 6 ment and employers. fazz is a new drug which requires FDA approval before it can distributed. The evidence in the EPA repot t is so compelling that STAT Is calling for action by all Federal, State and local agencies which regulate child and ad tilt daycare facilities to adop i new or revised regulations which completely ban smoking in facilities in which children or • FREE Y~,;~-4TH REPORTER f8 PROTECTING BABIES (Cont. from page 6) cantly increased intensity of neonatal care. In 1983, maternal low gestational age. The finding [of a dose response relationship] smoking accounted for 35,815 low birth weights in the United adds to the evidence that exposure to cigarette smoke products is States, or 14.5% of the total. Of these 14,977 required admission to involved in the sequence of events that result in SIDS,"' neonatal intensive care units at a cost of $272 million, representing 8.5% of total national neonatal care expenditures." Qt_her Types of Child Harm Caused by Smoking Pregnant women who do not smoke, but live with men who do, It has been hypothesized, and there is some evidence to support the may suffer some of the same harm to their unborn children as theory, that maternal smoking during pregnancy can result in in- women whosmokethemselves. Onestudyshowedthatnonsmoking creased risk of childhood cancer or even adult-life cancer among womenwholivedwith smoking men.duAngpregnancyhad66%as offspring. This could happen in one or all of three ways: sperm much reduction In infant birth weight as did women who them- abnormalities which occur in fathers who smoke"; transplacental selves were smokers." Another study suggested that "passive exposure to maternal cigarette smoke", or infantile exposure to smoking during pregnancy doubles a nonsmoker's risk of having parents' tobacco smoke pollution', a growtlrretarded infant. This association was not explained by the effects of ;.ge, parity, or race."'" There is grows ngg evidence of a causal relationship between cigarette smoking and the incidence of leukemia in adults. In addition, The tobacco industry claims that smoking has not been proven tobe pregnant women who smoke increase the risk of leukemlaIn their the cause of low birth weights among smoking women, but that it offspring. 't'here appears lobe a si nificantly increased incidence of could be some other variable such as genetic make-up or low 1) dilldhood leukemia among the children of women who smoked income. A substantial preponderance of the research, However, during pregnancy:" shows that the relationship between smoking and infant harm is independent of all other factors.1-" Studies of twins who give birth There is also evidence linking maternal smoking during pre fancy where one smokes and the other doesn't "strengthen the hypoth- with birth defects in offspring. A recent Swedish study found a esis that smoking has a direct effect on fetal growth rates."' slgnificantassociation between maternal smokinginpregnancyand single umbilical artery, which is one of the most common con enital The tobacco industry has worked to discredit research proving the malformations In infants" Another study showed an assocationn,, d harm of smoking duringpregnancy,includirgthat paidforbyits although not statistically significant, between maternal smokingan own research arm. A 1979 brochure publisFied by the Tobacco neurological handicaps including cerebral palsy, retardation, and Institute Is typical. This brochure, which does not contain the epilepsy In childhood." Surgeon Generals waming, admits that babies of smoking women on averagqe weigh less than those of nonsmokers but disputes that Several studies have shown an association between maternal smok- smokingls the cause. ing and central nervous system and cleft palate malformations. 40,41,42 As the 1980 Surgeon Generals report noted, while firm conclusions More important, the document fails to mention that low birth may not yet be drawn as to whether maternal smoking during weight is a potentially lethal condition, or the other fatal complica- pregnancy can cause birth defects in children, further research is tions that can arise horn maternal smoking. In fact, it deceptively 'urgently needed." cites a government report In such a way as to make it appear that smoking actually protects low, birth weight babies against death. It Children exposed to ETS pollution are also more likely to suf fer I rom falsely iliesthltheonlyevidenceagainstci arettesisstatistical, asthma. According to Dr. Scott Weissof the Harvard MedicalSchool, and concludes that smoking is not theculprit-In nyhealth prob- this hasbccomeaserious problem because ofthesignificant Increase lems for women: in smoking rates among women of childbearing age. He says that maternal smoking more than doubles the risk of childhood asthma, "Science would seem to have answers other than smoking. Despite and that an asthmatic child who lives with a smoker Is far more I!kely claim? to the contrary, no one-in government or industry--can to be hospitalized.," i z~ explain with certainty the reported associations of smoking Ina various health problems. It is a cardinal principle that stativtics The Fetal Tobacco •Sy- rome alone can not establish causality. And no ingredient as foiuid in cigarette smoke has been demonstrated scientifically to cause hu- In a 1985 commentary, criteria were established to define fetal man disease."' tobacco syndrome, including specific parameters regarding mater- nal smoking levels and infant growth retardation indicators. The Smoking and Infant Dea authors concluded: Mothers who smoked uring pregnancyyaremore likely tohave their "The time has come to recognized arettesmoking asthesingle most infants die than are nonsmoug mothers. It was reported as early powerful determinant of poor fetafgrowth in the aeveloped world... as 1%7 that the rate of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) was Use of the term'fetal tobacco syndrome'as a diagnosticlabel for the significantly higher among smoking mothers than among non- fetal growth retardation associated with maternal smoking should smokers." A re}rospective study in 1976 concluded: facilitate professional and lay awareness of the frequency, seven and varied manifestations of tobacco-induced fetal damage-and its "The parents of SIDSvictims were more apt lobe cigarette-smokers, enormous contributions to morbidity and mortality among infanta and to smoke more heavily than parents who did not lose children and young children."" to the disease.`24 Several theories have been advanced as to the physiological mecha- A 1972 study concluded that elevated mortality among the infants idsm by which cigarette smoke harms. the unborn child. Withdozens of smoking mothers was directly caused by smoking, and that the of toxic substances in cigarette smoke, it is probable that more than r able cause of death among stillbirths was anteparturn bleed- one plays a harmful sole, and gtdte likely they work together in evil ,whileamongnewborns itwaspneumonia ,respiratory distress syynnerggyy. InanunpubLWhedpaper tworesearchers eloquendydescribe syndrome, and gross immaturity related to harm caused by toxic? ` theeffectofcarbonmonoxide onthedeveloping fetus, and conclude: substances in tobacco smoke?' "Just twp packs of ciggarettes per day results Ina 10% concentration Prosppective studies in 1976 and 1979 found a dose-response rela- of carboxyTlemoglobin,which is uivalenttoa60%reductionInthe tionshlp in which the babies of heav smokers were nearly twiceas blood flow (from mother to Infant]. As the fetus is In a low oxyy CIA likely to die of SIDS as the babies ofynonsmokers 16," A 1977 study environment, there is little margin for safely with respect to tisgue concluded that women who smoke have 1.8 times the riskof losing oxygertation. Furthermore, the fetus is unable to compensate by their babies through spontaneous abortion as do nonsmokers.2' lncreasingcardiac output as this is already at or near peak. Thus, the fetus is unable to compensate adequately for carbon monoxide front A 1988 study found a dose-response relationshipbetween maternal ciarettesmoke... The fetus can be compared to the canary that used smoking and SIDS, and ;Aso evidence that the newborn's exposure tote taken underground by miners to detect carbon monoxide.015 to environmental tobacco smoke pollution was a contributing factor in sudden Infant death syndrome." It also concluded tha} preventing maternal smoking dudngpregnancycould reduce fetal Harm to the Mother and lnfanf deaths by 10 percent.70 A study published in 1992 re- inforced this finding, concluding that maternal smoking during Smoking-related complications of pregnancy can also harm or kill pregnancy doubledthe risk of SIDS, and when coupled wit Fi thetnother. Womenwhotake birth control pIlls significantlyIncreTse exposure during pregnancy, the risk Increased by threefold" their risk of dyinggof stroke and heart attack.'" Ina sad illustration of the twisted privilege the tobacco Industry has been granted, the The report of the Environmental Protection Agency on Respiratory following warning Is included by the manufacturers of birth control Health Effects of Passive Smoking concluded; pills, who have assumed a duty to warn women that ciga rette makers still avoid: "In summary, there is strong evidence that infants whose mothers., smoke are at increased risk of dying suddenly and unexpectedly "Cigarette smoking increases the risk of serious cardiovascular side during the first year of life. The relationship is independent of all effects from oral-contraceptive use. This risk increases with age and other known risk factors for SIDS, including low birthweight and with heavy smoking (15 or more cigarettes per day) and is quite (Cont. on rage 14) v4 Syr tar (Contd. from page 1) NATIONAL NEWS and Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts. Shalala should emphasize; Now, on both the federal and state levels, the tobacco industry is 1. Funds under this law should be available to use for enforcement attacking the implementation of the Synar Amendment. The attack of the laws prohibiting sales of tobacco to minors. is both contradictory and ingenious on the federal level; the tobacco industry is attemppting to weaken the _regulations as much as pos- 2. States must require iicensure for sale of tobacco products, with sible, especially tE~e enforcement provisions. On the state level, the fines and license revocation for retailers (riot the clerks) who violate tobacco industry is telling le 'stators and health officials that the the tobacco sales laws. S' ar Amendment requires c~anges instate laws so that the states won't lose federal dollars. But, then the industry tries to get their pro- 3. States must conduct random, upciercover compliance checks tobacco legislation through, under the guise of "protecting youth several times a year, using youngsters at least 16 years of age so that from tobacco", es c'ally pushing 'preemption' clauses which retailers must check IDs regularly to determine purchasers ages. prohibit cities and towns Lin enacting stronger laws than the weak skate law. As described below, these attacks are strong and must be 4. HHS should set performance standards in the re ulations which counteredNOWI states must meet orrisk losing federal funds, e.gg.,tha~no morethan 4V16 of retailers should be selling to minors at the end of the first year e key provisions in the Synar Amendment require the following; of enforcement under this law; no more than 30% by the end of the ' second year; no more than 20 °'o at the end of the third year, and no states must have laws which ban the sale of tobacco to more than 10% at the end of the fourth and subsequent years. persons under 18 years of age; 5. Retailers must have signs at every point of sale and point of statei musk enforce th layys in a maer that coq 4,dd~sp]ay which state that saes tom ors y retailers are illegal, and expected to reduce the avallabAli of tobacco tom1pors; :hying an 800 number which can b~cdUed to report retailer viola- ' 14 ~ flons of the law. states must submit annual reports to the Secretary of HHS describing their efforts to reducetobacco Industry access to minors; 6. States must pass laws outlawing all free distribution of tobacco, products, inciudin by mail, by givfng out samples on the street or at ' states must use "random, unannounced inspections" of events sponsored >By tobacco companies or retailers. retailers selling tobacco products to determine if the laws are being adhered to; IMPORTANCE OF ACTING NQ The Synar Amend- authorizes HttS to withhold up to 4016 of a state's federal ment provides one of the few opportunities the tobacco sulstanceabumfunds ifItisdeferminedthat states irenotenforcing control community has had to put real enforcement teeth thetr tobacco sales to minors laws. Into current state lawsprohibitingg tobacco sales to minors. However, federal regulations which do not require the Sy linking the enforcement of state laws forbidding sales of tobacco above provisions could be so weak that they would ptyducts o minors with the receipt by states of federal drug abuse re uire states to do little more than many currently are to hindtng,theSynarAmendmenthasreal teeth. Further, by requiring q Industry Is working dili- states to produce annual reports on their efforts to reduce tobacco enforce the laws. The tobacco industry access to minors, the Synar Amendment provides tobacco gently to get HHS to issue ve }Neatc fegy#a ons: Your co of activists with a means of monitoring how effectively states letters ngWv ale vital to encdu age"'SSecretary Shalala"to' a roplaenting theSyn4 Amendment. make tobacco control a significant part of her agenda for old . ACI'IO.IyON -ERALLEVEL children and health. u i however, one of the first steps in Oriple{nent}pg h~ j yna} ~melid-'vim iq frppcted tq issue draft regulations tri MaY or l one, with a (0 meat is the promulgation o regt}~titlons by the edera De artment day comment period. Call STA for up-to-date information on the of Health M man Services to guide states in understanding what regulations. they will be required to do. These regulations can either assure that ACTION ON THE STATE LEVEL; the letter and spirit of the Synar Amendment is carried out, or they can undercut this new law. As indicated above, the tobacco industry, in another of its clever Originally, it was expected that the out-going Bush Administration lobbying tactics, is telling state legislators and health officials that would issue the Synar Amendment regulations. However, this did heir tates are threatened with loss of millions of dollars in Federal not ~iappen. Therefore, the new regulations will be issued by the drug abuse funding if they don't act right now to comply with the Clinton Administration, through -Donna Shalala, the new Secretary S a Amend entregulations.THISISABSOLUrELYANDCOM- of health & Human Services S}. ia, The tobacco industry. in a number of states, including Georgia, ix ry . dreds of fetters had been sent to former Secretary of HHS; Alabama, Texas, Washington state and others, sought to "marry" U s SulUvan, urgingg him to include provisions in the relations wMchwould assurethattheSynarAmendment wasproper-lyimple itself The Knave sedliies,dece tionandha elplayledtothefears mented by the states. Now it is time to deliver his same message to of state offlc3als and drug abuse programs that they will lose their Secretary Shalala. Letters should be sent to her as follows: Federal funding if they don't enact new laws. Secretary Ponna Shalala Congressman Mike Synar was so outraged at he tobacco industry Department of Health B Human Services tactics that he issued a statement on April 12, 1993 saying, "I am epend.nce Avenue, S.W. concerned that the tobacco industry is attempting to o r amber of H200 H Independence ubert dependence Building, Room 6]5 F Washington, D.C. 20201 states to misuse the Synar 'Amendment as a vehicle for )dlling Arearingfultobacco control laws atthelocal level. TheSynarAmend- l lbe tlleres onsibility o~thenew HFISSecretary, Donna Shalala; ment was not intended to be used as a "Trojan Horse" for tobacco jjP industr su orted reem tion measures. ,4111e final approval to the regulations. Letters should be sent to her y pp p p dv so that she understands that this is an important issue that needs Congressman S nar was also concerned that states not act to pass Sullivan, , wtr tea gain to Secretary Shalalawmaking many of he same legislation until the HHS regulations are issued, so that theyy will ants about what is needed In the 'regulations. know what they are required to do to comply with the 5ynar P°, Amendment. The tobacco industry is trying create a sense of n a4ditiop; be sure to point out that his is a "children and health" urger e and fear to will h required to to do. C ngres fore they aid, RWO, since 90"/o of smokers start before'age 20 and 60% start before nor sus who t they laws before HHS o. Co es Section 1826 i said, a e 15. Tobacco prevention needs to be an integral part of any menting regulations ons run the risk of losing their federal substance an Itite programs Secretary Shalala advocates, and it needs to be and treatment block rant fundin " an Integr gral part of any national health insurance proggram she is abuse prevention g g. involved in developing. The Synar Amendment regulations will The menage is clear: States should strongly o pone any and all directly complement both other children's and health insurance efforts to change their current tobacco laws Vtp , in any way programs. weaken existing laws. Most importantly, any preemption clause in a "I be (following are ley elements wjdch STAT t lieve4 should be In proposed law should always be opposed and should be a key litmus the Sknai Amendmenf regulationi4 and which' letters to Secretary test for whether to oppose a bill. s c u 10, P""%OTECTING BABIES FROM, HILIP MORRIS & RJR NABI. by Joe Tye Cigarettes ate baby-killers. The executives at Philip Morris and In 1980 the U.S. Surgeon General's report on the health consequences RJR Nabisco know this, yet they continue to use sophisticated of smoking for women concluded that: promotional campaigns to encourage young women to smoke, and their public relations mouthpieces continue to deny the sci- Numerous toxic substances in cigarette smoke, such as nicotine and entific evidence that mothers who smoke risk fatal harm to their hydrogen cyanide, cross the placenta to affect the fetus directly... babies. Studies show that the s nn,, The evidence is not new. For over 50 years, medical journal articles ofneonal ldeathincr asesdiirrectlywithIncreasedleof fetal velsofmat~ernand al have warned that maternal smoking during pregnancy can harm smoking during pregnancy... or kill infants. Philip Morris, RJR, and the other tobacco companies have consistently responded with their usual formula of denying (Smoking-caused complications of preggnnaanncy] carry with them a high the facts, and using decep'Ive advertising to promote smoking risk of fetal and neonatal loss, and are frequentl cited as the cause of among the most vulnerable po ulations. Ills corporate evil has death among the offspring of women who smoke... killed (and will continue to kill) thousands of Wants, and has caused serious illness and permanentdamage to thousands more. Abundant evidence has been presented that a smoking-related increase More than one -quarter of the nation's children are exposed t In preterm delivery plays an Important role In the increased risk of neonatal death for infants of smokers... cigarette smoke, ith 43% of children in low-income families sb ,T, exposed. This riestonearly half when pregnant mothers whoare Increasing levels of maternal smoking result in a highly siQt~iflcant exposed tosidestreamsmokearefactoredin.Children wholive in Increase in therisksofplacental abrup ons,placentaprevia, leedin a home with a smoker are almost twice as likely to be in poor health early or late In pregnancy, premature and prolonged rupture 01 as children in nonsmoking homes, membranes, and preterrn de every, all of which carry high risks of It has been estimated that one of every ten fetal and infant deaths perinatal loss... are caused by maternal smoking during pregnancy. The toxic These findings lead to the conclusion that maternal smoking can be a substancesin cigarette smokeretard the intrauterine development direct cause of fetal or neonatal death In an otherwise normal Infant of the fetus, leading to increased risk of low birth weight and prematurity, which in turn Increases the risk of infant death. Babies of women who) smoke are more likely to die dudn ppreg- Smoking and Low 81rth 1NeTl¢t nancy, and to die of sudden irdant death syndrome (S1lOS~tn the One of the first documented problems caused by matemalsmokin$ is months immediately after birth. Children of women who smoke low birth weight and prematurity. Adequate birth weigqht is of major suffer retarded physical and mental development, and are more importance to the health and survival of the Infant. Infants who are susceptibletochildhoodrespiratory•diseases.Each year, thousanda considered low birth weight (ander2,500gra*ns)have amortality rate of cigarette-caused spontaneous abortions, miscarriages, and that is 30 times higher than those weighing more than 2,500 grams! neonata deaths are caused by ma temal smoking during pregnancy. A 1957 medical journal article reviewed earlier studies and its own retrospective epldemiolocal studyy to conclude that maternal smoking ternal Smokkg and Infant Harm during pregnancy was significantly related with premature birth. It reporfj that smoking mothers were twice as likely as nonsmokers to Evidence of a causal relationship between maternal smoking and have premature babies, and that the probability increased with the infant harm began to appear during the 1930s, shortly after the number of cigarettes smoked (dose-response relationship): tobacco Industry aggressively targeIed women with advertising campalgnsencouraging them to smoke. In 1935, for example, a T-dsstudywasfollowed in1959byanotherretro.ectivestudyw•hlch study on the effect of nicotine on fetal heart rates con-luded: corroborated and reinforced its findings ° A 1961 prospective study also found a dose-response relationship between maternal smoking 1. There is adefiniteandrealeffectofmaternalsmoking ontherate and low birth weight. of the fetal heart. i a In 1965, a largge study of pregnancy outcomes among smokers and 2. Tbis increase appears to be due to the passage of the toxic nonsmokers strowed a dose-response relationship between maternal products of tobacco smoke Into the fetal circulation where they smoking during pregnancy and loin, birth weight, prematurity, and affect the fetal heart rate in thesame way that adult heart rates are cigarette-caused spontaneous abortion. The report reviewed evidence affected. that carbon monoxide, nicotine, or other toxic substances in cigarette smoke were responsible, concludingg that "the true etiology of the 3. Since the tonic effect of tobacco upon young children and of effect that cigarette smoke has onthefetusisprobablyasummationof nicotine contained In mothers' milk have been reported, a careful all these factors, with some playing a more significant role than study of the newborn offspring of mothers who smoke heavily others."10 durin_ g pregnancy is indicated. Evidence of urious effect of smoking during pregnancy may be overlooked. This study was funded by the tobacco industry's Council for Tobacco Research. Likewise, the Council for Tobacco Research provided As more women responded to tobacco ndustry inducements and funding to the American Medical Association for a wide-ranging took up smoking, references to the harm of maternal smoking study of the health hazards of smoking, Including during pregnancy. during prw-gnanc became more frequent in the medical literature. Forty-five studies conce med the effecE of smoking in pregnancy anti A 1941 m cal oumal article reviewed the literature up to that confirmed the relatloWdp between smoking and low bfrth weight, time and warn : , among other problems" There Is ample evidence in the literature that nicotine poisoning By 1966-two years before Philip Morris targeted young women in does have a deleterious effect on pregnancy and reproductive their child-bearingg years with Virginia Slims c7 arettes-thecase was efficiency... Until we can prove that excessive smoking is not virtually closed. Dtirring that year, onemedical oumalarticle wasable harmful in pregnancy, we should caution against it,' to refer to "the well-known negative association between maternal By 1979 a review of 230 scientific articles concluded that the smoking during pregnancy and-the birth weight of the offspring."" relationship between maternal smoking and infant harm was Today, the finding is indisputable that maternal smoking can cause "strongly supported" by the following: low birth weight. According to a 1984 medical journal article, "The relationship between smoking and low birth weight is one of the most 1, the consistency of the findings frcm 16 countries over two consistent findings in the epidemiologgic literature."" When women decades; quit smoking durin pregnancy theirbables will, on average, weigh 2. the dose-responserelationship; more than babies of women who do not quit." The reduction in birth weight appears to result from a direct effect of 3. the prevention or reduction of abnormal outcomes in women smoking on Fetal ggrowth rather than an Indirect effect of smoking on who stop smoking; reducing the moEcr's appetite, since growth retardation is found s mmetrically in all dimensions; in other words, maternal smoking 4. the controlled animal studies; during pregnancy does notcauseprematurebirthsomuchasItretards the znt's growth so that it is less well-developed at each stage of 55dthe biological plausibility of several hypothetical mechanisms; maturation, Low birth weight is the single most important predictor of neonatal 6. the extensive documentation of the harmful effects of cigarette morbidity anddeath, and ]ow birth weight babies require signifl- smoking on other aspects of human health! Kant. on page 18) ProleciiL. dabies (Cont. from pagel8) 19 marked in women over 35 years of age. Women who use oral Center for HealthStarbtics,1991. contraceptives should be strongly advised not to smoke." 2 . Sontag LW and Wallace RE: The effect of cigaret (sic) smoking during pregnancy upon the fetal heart rate Am 1 Obstet and vnecol 1935, 29:77.83. The Role of Addiction 3 • Schoeneck Fl: Cigarette smoking in pregnancy jaw YoL State =njA of 141n~€, October], 1941: 1945-1948. yer S and Emanuel I: Smoking during pregnancy ~ , o Because of the addictive power of nicotine, many young women 1979,19:119-126. who may initially believe that they can stop smoking if they become 5.US,Surgeon General: Jbg11ealthConse q=Us9j5mokin41214ti'omen 1980, pre ,,rant find that they do not have the strength when the time pages 191.249. comes. In one study, only two ercent of unassisted women Lit gages Abel EL: Smoking during.pregna~~n~~tyy: a review of effects on growth and p development of the offspring Human pLot¢v• 1980, 52,593-625. smoking during pregnancy, and only 14`y° of those in an assisted 7. Simpson Wl: A reliminary re it on cigarette smoking and the incidence of group quit. Another study using three different interventions pprematuntyAmiy~,°1957,73:808.815. achieved only a 6% cessation rate. B . Lowe C : E feet of mothers' smoking habits on birth weight of their ;hildren ~h Medical loumai 1959, 2:673-676. Women with lower educational status are more likel to smoke 9 FrazierTM el at: Cigarettesmoking and prematurity: a prospective study Am LQI?,St ~c G~eco1 1961,81:988-996. during pregnancy; heavy smokers are less likely to qult19 In a 39 10. Underwood Pet al: Therelationshi of smoking to the outcome of pregnancy state study conducted b}' the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in Am1~t 1965,91:270-276, 1991, it was determined that about 30% of females in the child- H. American Me ica AssocidtionEducation Research Foundation; IQbaccoand bearing years of 18-to-44 were smokers. About 44% of these had H€dL 1978. madeatlleastoneseriousbutunst ccessful attempt likettoquitwithin the 12 . Mmeri On B, Alpert M and Salter EI Infant weight and parental smoking past year, with younger women having been more to tryS0 habitsA American and buss Suss EpidemtolTine 1966, growth 24261. g 13 . Stein ZA and er M: intrauterine growth retardation: epidemiological Issues and public health significance Se injirs in Perinttoloav 1984,8:7. 14. Sexton M and Hebei R: A clinical trial o change? in maternal smoking and its WARNING TO FEMALE PATIENTS: NICORETTE CONTAINS effect on birth weight le1MA 1984, 251:911-935. NICOTINE WHICH MAY CAUSE FETAL HARM WHEN AD- 15. Miller HC Ffasseinein K and Henslei~h PA: Fetal growth relardatlort in MINISTERED TO A PREGNANT WOMAN. DO NOT TAKE 1976 125 55 60rnalsmokingandweightgainlnpregnancy NICORETTE IF YOU ARE PREGNANT OR NURSING. TAKE 16'. Nter'G,DeleaTE,andColditzGA:Maternalsmoldngduringpregnan and PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID PREGNANCY WHILE USING expenditures on neonatal healthcare American Journal ofFrevent1wMed"Idne. NICORErM BUT IF YOU SUSPECT YOU ARE PREGNANT 1948, 4:216-219. STOP MEDICATION AND TELL YOUR DOCTOR AT ONCE. 17. Rub`nDHetal:Effectofpassive smoking onbirth-weightThel.ancelAugust 21 1996, Fa es, 415-417. KEEPTHIS AND ALL OTHER DRUGS OUTOFTHE REACH OF i8. Marf'ir R and Bracken MB: Association of low birth weight with passive CHILDREN. smoke exposure In pregnancy American loumal of ETtdemiolo w 1986, f24:633- 642. This Is they warning on a pack of Nicorette chewingg gum. The irony 19 . Wainright RL: Charge In observed birth weigh t Associated with change in isthatapr antwamanwhowlshestoquitsmokln beta he irony matemalcl are He smoking Ame canlof1rnaAjtt1,'~rlology1983,117:668-675. q g and chla L:G> o matemalci aiettesmo n durin regnancyonfetal Tough is barred from using nicotine gum or ppatches, even and childhood growth rowth Qbsletdcs and vn •coloQV 1981, 57:~~2t. though they are far less harmful than continued smoking. 21. Magnus PandBerg K: a-win orma onontheeffectofgenes onthevariation In birth weight ititedi;al n k• 19£5, p.:63.272. The Cli01on p scrinti U. The Tc,bacco institute: omen an Smoking, 1979, 23. Steele R Kraus AS and Langworth IT: Sudden, unexpected death in infan What can the Clinton administration do to held, protect the unborn 119658:359 art 1, methodology and findingst~jpIl,l of public Neall~ fromdiseaseand deathcaused by theirmother s nicotine addiction? 24. Bergman AB and Wiesner BA: Relationship of passive cigarette-smoking to sudden infant deathsyndrome Eedlaldss 1976,58; 665 668, First, it should support legislation for more powerful health warn- ~++drews f and Iv airy lM: A community study of smoking In pr an 7 on cigarette packages and advertising. The current warnings °L"'-i =snbsietries and (rynae~oio;X of the British C, w= vjdT197` are now nearly ten years old and have lost what effectiveness they 26. NaeyeRL: Sudden infant deaths yndrome 1976,130 1207-12 10. once may have had. As a result of tobacco industry lobbying, the 27: Lewak N van den Berk BI and Beckwith I : u en in ant deathavndroma r► . „ v F fi 7~r7.1073 uerca„~s unuTvtfII\S{1~u,rv yr r e utn~n ~ . ry~. ~w_a r,p .v, a, legs on cigarette packages and advertisinba'The current warnings are now nearly ten years old and have lost what effectiveness they 26. Naeye RL,Suddeninfant deat'hsyynndromeAsnli?itCh11dt975,t3o,t2n7-1210. once may have had. As a result of tobacco industry lobbying, the 7, tewak N vau den Fier Bf and Beckwith 5uddenTn3ant death syndrome words "spontaneous abortion" and "miscarriage" were removed 29s. Klines et awl: Smoking: a risk7factor 404-411. for pontaneous abortion Nm England from the warming proposed by the medical community to 1953, and l4itmal i ,f 1977,297:793-794. replaced with the more innocuous "complications of pregnancy;' 29 , btalloy MH, Kleinman IC, Land Gil, and Schramm WF: The associal6on of which to a teenage girl might as easily mean cramps as a dead baby. maternal smokin with ade and cause of infant death American I urnal ofTVL demio1~U 1988,128;46.5,. The new Warninggs should explicitly describe the risks of illness and 30 • Klewman IC et al; The effects of matemal smoking on fetal and infant t V_ death to both bab and mother in graphic terms. For exam le, one mortality American fo d 1988,127:274.282, y p 31. Schoendorf KC an Kiely JL: Relationship of suc'den infant death syndrome . warning might read: "Smoking during pregnancy can kill your to maternal smoking duringg and after pregnancy Pediatrics 1992,90,905-908 baby. 32.U.S.Environmental ProlectionAgency: Res iratoryHealth Effects ofPassive Smoking: Lung Cancer and Other Disorders, Washington D.C.,1992 (EPA /600/ Because the problem of nicotine addiction is significantly more 6.90/006F). onglessereducated women, thereshouldalsobe a 33• EvarsH)etat:Sperm abnormalities andcigarette smoking The. Lance March acutearpt pictorial 21 1981 pages 627.629, warning for those unable to read English well. A warning about the 34 . Everson RB: Individuals transplacentall exposed to matemal smo]-InsS may danger of addiction should make dear how difficult most women be at increased cancer risk In adult lifa July 19, 1980 pages i Y3126. find it to quit during pregnancy. 35 . Stjem;Wdt M et al: Maternal smo urin g pre ncY and the risk of childhood cancer Dg.1,fnW June 14,1986, pages 1350.1352. Second, Imagery advertising should be outlawed,l)miting ci arrtte 36•SandlerDPetai:CancerriskInadulthoodfromearlylifeexposuretoparents' smoking American lournal of Public Health 1985, 75:487.492. advertising to generic black-and-white text only. This wood pre- 37. ;Maternal smoking during pregnancy and risk of childhood cancer Lancet vent advertising for "forninine" cigarettes from pushing the notion 1986,1(8494):1350.1352. that smoking is an effective means of weight control and more 38 . Lifja GfNC: Sin le umbilical artery and maternal smoking British Medical generally from associating smoking with good health and attractive JAI 1991, 302:56. hose Rantaand Rfestyles. These types of advertisements have a disPr0lwrtionate mothers sm 39' hers sm ok keed during regna apregnan 1987,16:597-606. Neurological hands' - Influence on young people. 40. Hemminkl K Mutanen P and Sa oniemi l: Smo ing and the occurrence of congenital malformations and spontaneous abortions: multivariate analysis AM Third, ederal funding should be dedicated to a national educational LQ~~ 1983,145:61-b6. f 41.+ou Gomez-Farias M and MulinareJ: Does matemal smoking during cam a! tope] .eventchildren,andnt scull young rls,from ry ) p n Pk p . g pregnancycause cleft lip and palate In offspring? ,!,JJZC 1989,143:333.337. becoming involved in tubacmezperimeatton. sshou d feature }2 cyan Den EedenSK Karagas MR Daling)R anddtivau_ghan TL: Aerie-control counte--advertising of the type pioneered by DOC and now in use stud bfmaternalsmokingandcongenitalmalformationsPediatricandfcrlna~ In California and several other states. 1990,4:147-155. 4 enig :Asthma kills NewYork TiMgl Magazine IN iarchI' 19'73,pages42- Fourth, funding priority should be given to research into methods 52, total ant women smokillThisshouldincludeinnova 44. Niebu~rAPMarks )S McLaren NM and Remington PL: The fetal tobacco pprcgn quit g ndromeI&MA 1985,253:2998-2999. tive programs to give low income pregnant women and mothers a 95 , Sachs BP an Acker a Sharing the cigar: the effects of smoking in pregnancy. financial incentive to quit smoking. 46. U S. Surgeon General: The HealthCon~;uenrn• of Smoking for Womert 1980, ~+age viii. Finally, Bi11andHillary Clinton should usethe"bully pul it"of the {7. Windsor RA of al: The effectiveness of smoking cessation methods for smokers Presidency to encourage all Americans to refrain from tobacco use, RtQh 1985,75: maternity clinics: a random [zed Trial American loumal of Public and to counter the promotional Impact of decades of glamorous 48 . Vice )III et al: Comparison of three antismoking inlenentions among cigarette advertising with reminders of the reality of addiction, re ant women in an urban setting: a randomized trial Psvehol ant RepQres 991, 68:595-604, dlFease, and death-including the deaths of innocent babies. pregnant 49.FingerhutLA Klelnman)CandKendrickJS:Smoking before, during, and after ppre nanc Ith 1996, 80:341.544, FOOTNO 50 gCentero or Disease ontto : igarette smoking among reproductive-aged 1. Overpeck MD and Moss A): Cbildren'a ex ron ure to environmental cigarette 723men-behavioral risk factor surveitJance system, 1989 p]YB 1991, 40 719• after birth H smoke before and t Advance data from vital And health aia tics, 0.202, ya4bvi a ,Nona Y I i - 1 , St T TOBA('.CO AND ROLL-YOUR-OWN TOBAGO: TOBA(-CO'S CHEAP ATTACK ON YOUTH SPIT TOBACCO: ROLL-YOUR-OWN TOBACCO: A NATIONAL EPIDEMIC THE NEXT CHEAP ATTACK Spit tobacco use is increasing at an astonishing rate, particularly Steep increases in the cost of premium brand cigarettes from money- amongAmerica'syoungpeople. "ihisphenomenon iscausingalarm hungry tobacco companies have resulted in a boom in discount among the country's leading health experts who are predicting an brands of cigarettes, and recently have resulted in Marlboro and oral cancer epidemic of disastrous proportions if current trends Camel prices being ctlt. [see page I article] But, the new kid on the aren't stopped now. Herearea few facisthat have comeout of recent block to hook teens at a cheap and convenient price is "roll-your- studies: own" tobacco. In 1970, most users of snuff were men, aged 50 and over. But Roll-your-own tobacco is the original way to make cigarettes. But, by 1985, boys aged 16 to 19 were using snuff twice as much as now, it is being re-packaged as a coot, sexy, independent way to men! smoke. It's a"march to your own drummer" theme. The old brands of loose tobacco, like Bugler, are still around, but they haven't In 1990-1991, nearly 1 in 5 high school males surveyed used adopted new marketing themes - yet. One brand has - called spit tobacco. "DRUM". And, it's a lot cheaper than regular cigarettes - but, just as addictive. Spit tobacco use increased by 40% among college athletes between 1985 and 1989. A full paM9 d [see below] for Drum appeared in the March, 1993 issue of magazine [see pagge 19 Nall of Shame for article on In states like Tennessee and Montana, up to one-third of high SPIN]. Targeted to youth, Drum fs making a strong pitch that roiling school boys use spit tobacco. your own cigarettes is the way real cool and independent teens smoke. And, as many folks In their 30's and 40's know, rolling your Use of spit tobacco is a special oblem for Native American own isn't hard to learn how to do. youth. In several areas of the cooofrioux , Native American use exceeds 50% Ninety-one percent County's male seventh Roll-your-own tobacco needs to be targeted now by the pro-health graders in North Dakota now use spit tobacco. community. Steep taxes on loose tobacco are the best approach to keep this from being a cheap substitute for ready-made cigarettes. i~ Theaverageageoffirst useamong users recently surveyed was And,asalways,freesampleshavetobeprohibited.Further, v:arning nine years old. labels must be required on ads and the packages. * Spit tobacco has high levels of nilrosamines, a cancer causing ( 1 r ` 1 I ! agent toggally regulated by the federal government in foods - y but not in tobacco products. 1 ' The average snuff user is exposed to nearly 300 times more nitrosamine than a non-smoker. lu lhr %r%lt !'r klh al H 1°rrl Aelee, Underage spit tobacco occurs In every region of the country. o rrl(b ol - This is not a rural problem - it's a national problem. y y 1x wulya,,,r~t,uscul lg%. urwu18 tY41dLLV duu snutt-the tttvoprimary forms of smokeless" - or more accurately described "spit 1. - tobacco,are wagin •waronourch)ldren• Of the estimated 10million American users fl, 'it tobacco, 3 million are under the age of 21, many of them still playing Little League baseball. The 1990 Youth Risk Behavior Sun ey found that 24% of all white male high school students currently use spit tobacco. _ (Cont im page 20) M ~~1( uW Y M d.. Inspector General Warns of Dangers of Spit Tobacco In December 1992, the United States Inspector General released findings from its second study on the use of spit tobacco among e: young people. The study, requested by Surgeon General Anoonla ` ove lo, reinforces earlier findings and confirms that spit tobacco SPIT TOBACCO AND SPORTS: DOORIV { A TEAM EFFORT According to a report released by the Centers for Disease Control A GEAR 1 j and Prevention (CDC) In April, 1993, Americans, particularly 1 younger men, are using more chewing tobdcco every year, party due to the influence of baseball players. The CDC reports that 5.3 million adults used chewing tobaccoor snuff in 1991, the latest year 4 t ppor which data are available. About 4.8 million were men, equaling ' S.6 percent of all men, These numbers suggest a high number of spit tobacco users are starting In their teenage years. productsnastsafegannd athertinnocuoousilull tobaccopromoted dinthe to 4S;V0AZ 6 "The believing that there were no risks associated with its use. terna -.1 1 Is pr%agsed every season es Americans see playeers spew- [ ' t t / t t t r ' Ing tobacco juice," said Dr. Michael Eriksen. "This conveys a strong message that it's safe because young, healthy, wealthy athletes are using persists as a national health problem with serious potential health ft." conseq uences. Government figgures show that 45 eecent of the nation's pre- In re easin the report, Novello stressed her dismay at this health mi ~ e professional athletes and role models use smokeless tobacco. threat. "Thisehreat is oral cancer - an a idemic In the making that c en t aers ndlre you n u g i adul{ males, who are ~umbeh`o spit tobacco cgco prod- will occur if young peo le continue to use'spit' tobacco," she aid, ucts In alarming numbers. Recent estlmates put the number of spit "1 am deeply concemedpby the attempts of the spit tobacco Industry tobacco users under the agge of 21 at 3 million. The 1990 Youth Risk to downplay the health hazards posed by this type of tobacco." Behavior Survey found tat 24% of all white mate high school (Cont. on page 20) (Con 1. on page 2 1) Spit Tobacco: A National Epidemic (Cont. from page 7) Spit tobacco users have two ways of using their drug. Snuff for spit tobacco in sport and youth magazines should be prohibited, dippers place a small amoiant of shredded or finely round tobacco (loose or encased In a paper pouch) between their c eek and Rum. 5. Corporate sponsors should campaign against the use of tobacco Tobacco chewers place a wad of oose leaf tobacco or a plug of by children with the same real they display in fighting the use of compressed tobacco In their cheek. Both dippers and chewers suck illegal drugs. on the tobacco and spit out the tobacco juices and saliva generated. In either case,this sucking and spitting process delivers a potent ppunch to the body, sending a whopping dose of nicotine directly Inspector General Warns of Dangers throughthesofttissuesofthemouthandgumsinto thebloodstream. (Cont. from page 7) Users of spit tobacco are quickly addicted, and 4.. o of young users recently surveyed have tiled -unsuccessfully - to quit. Major Report Findings, Spit Tobacco an Youth Decembei 1992 h11992, 30,300 new cases of oral cancer were diagnosed in this country. About 75 percent of these are attributed to tobacco use. On Under-age spit tobacco use Is high, widespread and begins early. average, half of these -over 15,000-have only a five-year survival Nearly one in five higgh school males used spit tobacco in 1990 and rate. 1991. In some states, UN Tennessee and Montana, up to one third of high school males use spit tobacco. In some areas of the country, "Smokeless" Product Positioning Boosts Deadly Snuff Sales r`' Native American use exceeds 50 percent, and female rates some- The tobacco industry's advertising and marks dng geniuses times equal, or even exceed, the high rate among males. have been hard at work devising ways to convince the public - Age 11 or 12 is typical for starting use. Underage users are often especially our vulnerable children - that spit tobacco Is sale. Hence addicted to spit tobacco, and thus are seriouslyy endanggedn their the term "smokeless" tobacco, which wrongfully implies that if health. While short term use often causes leukopla~Cia white, there's no smoke there's no danger. This is a horrible lie. wrinkled skin patches inside themouth whicheanover timebecome Carefully crafted marketing strategies have caused the con- malignant), long term use greatly increases the risk for oral cancer. sumpption of snuff to increase by 57% in nine short years, between 198ffand 1989. This dramatic Increase Is the result of extensive point- Friends, Family and Other Incentives Strongly Corildbuje to of-purchase displays, wide distribution of free samples, and spon- Under-age Use sorshupp of touring, sports and cultural events, all of which smartly Perceived social support from fathers, other male relatives and side-step existing laws prolubiting advertising to youth. friends is an influential reason youth first try spit tobacco. Parents In countless neighborhood grocery stores, gas stations, and truck and school officials mistakenly think spit tobacco is somehow safer stops across the country, these products are displayed at checkout than smokingg; kids think it's cool; law enforcement officials can't counters alongside the candy and couggh drops. find the timefoenforceregulationsgivenall the otherproblems they A shredded chewing gum called ' ig League Chew" prepares must deal with. in short, everyone seems to be telling kids that spit very yyoung mouths for a future chewing of tobacco. "Tape Twist- tobacco is okay, compared with other vices. ers Alewing gum comes in lots of fruity flavors, served up in its own A major factor in the ins eased use of spit tobacco in recent years little snuff-siuzed container. has been the greatly increased advertising campaign by US Tobacco The introduction of SKOAL Bandits, an easy to use "tea bag" of and other spit tobacco producers. Use of sporE figures such as snuff, makes it extremely convenient for young users to take up the baseuall players Is an effective ploy for enticing young males to use habit. The Bandit is a low-nicotine teaching tool that allows novices spit tobacco. to slowly develop tolerance to tobacco. Once a "taste" Is acquired, Product placement in stores and "look-alike" items further en- new dippers often move to more potent and addictive brands, such hanceacceptabilityof use. It's time that spit toba.caand "look-alike" as the OS Tobacco Company's products, SKOAL and Copenhagen. rockets were moved from the candy shelf (sea photo of Big League Perhaps it's no coincidence that ninety percent of the increase in spit Chewing Gum below). tobacco sales is accounted for by these two brands. But perhaps the most Ingenious and effective means of building Extensive and Successful Promotion of Spit Tobacco Victimizes widespread acceptance for the useof spit tobacco was by associating Susceptible Youtn. it with our national passion, professional sports. Recent govern- Snuff consumption has nearly tripled since 1972, making it a very ment figures show that 45% of major and minor league baseball prof itablebusness. Eventl+oughbroadcastadvertisinewasbanned players use spit tobacco, providinga not-tou-subtle example to loyal and warnings are required in pint advertising, tobacco companies young fans, who want to emulate their heroes in every way. Pitcher have found and now masterfully use a wide variety of means to Nolan Ryan remembers that when he joined the majors 20 years ago, effectively promote their product. Through the sponsorship of nearly one-third of the pplayers srnoked,but no one dipped snuff. popular sports and entertainment events (rodeos, stock car races, I?uringg the 1980s, thingsglaye s change,withplayers now rejecting concerts), and the widespread distribution of free samples tobacco egan to ciggarettes for snuff. Says Ryan,"7heswitch came with free samples companies are keeping their products on the minds andinKhands like of dip coming into the clubhouse." Supplied by kindly and health- Cof vulnerable arnet and Mar]boao, is nawein the p omotionaitem ba sines with conscious tobacco company reps, no doubt. Its "Skoal Outdoor Sportsman Gear Catalog". Improved Efforts Are Needed to Curb Promotion, Access and Use Federal efforts to stem the use and promotion of spit tobacco have Spit Tobacco Laws and Their Enforcement are Weak and been Inadequate and Ineffective. In 1985 Congress voted to restore Ineffective. the federal excise tax on snuff and chewing tobacco -just a penny While many othercountries prohibit spit tobacco, Americanregula- a pack, The following year, Congress passed the Comprehensive tort' policy is inconsistent with other tobacco products. The Com- conActot 1986 has not SmokelessTobaccoHealthEducatlnAct, which mandatedwarningg ppre est an v e Smokeless eobaccoealt Eo useb labels on packs and print advertisementsandwhich, allegedly should b yy gpeople. have banned televisedhdvertising for spit tobacco. Accordtngto the and local tobacco control and access laws have loopholes and lack PTC,in199843%oftheadvertising exppcndituresforspit tobaccdtvas enforcement. Across the countryy an average of three out of four devoted to free ram lingg and evenfs sponsorship, which are not retail stores have been found to sell}obaccoto minors as young as age addressed by the federallaw. Since then, major tobacco companies 12, krnni nn page 211 have increased their sponsorship of sports and cultural events„ many of which are televised. Actions by state governments have been stronger than those at the federal level but have accom fished little. The number of states that tax spit tobacco increased from 19 to 33 between 1983 and 1939, however tax rates vary widely, Maine and Washington are setting$ excellent examples for other states, taxing spit tobacco products at • 50%and65°/>ofwholesale price, respectively. Muchneedednoware bans on free sampling, such as have been enacted in California. While ,gcoincerted actions tare are taking form in needed, such as the somepocets of the co< ntry 1. Existing laws limiting minors' access to spit tobacco must be t enforced. r' 2. Athletes' influence as role models must be reclaimed from f `p exploilatlon by the tobacco industry. As a first ste , players I R Y p; endorsin these roducts, and shout refraln from s should stop owl, using spit tobacco in public and during games. 3. Taxes 'd' ould be raised on all forms of tobacco, including spit i s tobacco, ana portion of the Increase should be d ed icated to counter- advertisingcampalgns• NReeDta uRIutou L*J a Le 1W NU Wl. 2.10 OL 60Q 4. Free sampling, sponsorship of sporting events, and advertising a 8 • • STNI E NEWS MASSACHUSETTS VOTES TOBACCO TAX NEW YORK PASSES 17c TOBACCO TAX INCREASE INCREASE Massachusetts voters in November endorsed a $0.25/ pack increase In his budget message to the New York legislature, Governor Marti in the tobacco tax and directed the legislature to use all the revenues Cuomo proposed a $0.21 /pack Increase in the state tobacco tax for pro-health, anti-tobacco rograms. By a 54`90 to 46% margin, the whId' would make New Yotk's tobacco tax $0.60/pack. Facing r voters passed referendum &estron #I. difficultchallengetobalance thestate budget, theGovernorproposec{ to raise $180 millllion in the next fiscal year through this tax increase The increase in the tobacco tax went into effect on January 1, 1993, Thc Governor proposed that most of the new revenues o toward giving Massachusetts a state tobacco tax of $0.51, then the hl hest in balancing the budget, but that some of the funds o to programs tr tlienation. Since Federal tobacco taxeswentupby$0.04ont esame revert tbacco addiction. In addition, the Governor anticipated date and these taxes are subject to the state sales tax, smokers were that t tobacco by itself ll reduce on, th Governor anersin t faced with a New Year's tax increase of $0.31 /pack. state by 494,. Currentl, about 22.5% of New York adults are smokers The Question #1 referendum was a I iercely fought battle between Willi more case than expected, the New York le islahue ust passed pro-health dby land the tobacco industry. uemeri ppr #1 oper a budget thatincludedapl7¢/ ackIncreaseinthetobaccotax,makin n reledbyy l the A New York's tax 56¢/Fack, noty the highest In the nation. F Society, , headed by D Drr. . Blake e Cady, , a a member ber of the STAT TAT BdAr Board d of of Directors. ACS, STAT and over 240 other groups suppportingg Question #1 were ILLEGAL TOBACCO SALES IN NEW YORK strongly o~posed by the tobacco Indus trywhich spent about $7 'TOTAL $39.5 MILLION million fl rung the tax Increase. The to acco industry hired a number of very respected former legislators and executive branch officials to press their message that this was just one more tax Tobacco sales to minors in New York state In 1991 are estimated to increase onan already over-taxed state. Using very effective TV and have yielded $39.5 million to the tobacco Industry, according to an radio ads, the tobacco Industry was able to cut Initial support for article in the December, 1992 New York State Journal of Medicine. Question 01 from almost 75% of the voters to just 56% on election The authors concluded that approximately 135,700 teens smoked an day. avera ~e of 1.3 million cigarettes a day In the state. They estimated The industry was careful In their ads to virtually ignore the word that 6,100 packs of cigparettes are sold illegally to mtn~ ors eggveryggday, "tobacco" and focus on voter opposition to "taxes" and on distrust a or nb 21.9 veaC1et pick tests $1.80, his means that ille tlal'sales prFoducefn$39.5 of politicians and how they would use the increased tax revenue. As mitlion a year. 8 i In all tobacco Industry advertising, they never mentioned thehealth hazards of tobacco. And, they spent over $7 million dollars to get The authors, using the UiFranza and Tye estimate that 31% of total their message to the voters- that is twicewhat the currentGovernor salesprlceminusrtaxesequalthetobacco Industry's profit, concluded spent In his election campaign two years ngo, that the tobacco industry makes about $83 million a year from sales Question #1 Proponents focused the campaign on tobacco as a of cigarettes to minors In New York state. childrens' and health Issue. The campaign constantly pointed out Based on these find ings,theauthorsrecommend that thestate should that 11,000 Massachusetts residents die every year from tobacco- consfderdoubling thecurrent taxof$0.39/ acktodiscuurageyouth related diseases, and that 90% of smokers start In their teens and 60% from smoking and to fund tobacco preventionprogram3,whicEtthey start before they are 14 years of age. I lie campaign drove home the suggest are currently woefully underfunded. The authors also rec- point that childrens lives were at stake and that over $1.5 billion a ommend enactment of an Illegal drug profit tax on the cigarette year was spent In Massachusetts for health care due to tobacco- industry to recover profits obtained from the Illegal vales to minors. related disease and for lost productivity. This message prevailed on election day, s s It is expected that 80,000 people will not start smoking In the first year FLORIDA GROUPS PROPOSE NEW TOBACCO TAX alone In the state as a result of the tax increase and the public OF $1.00/PACK campaign to prevent addiction to tobacco. A I'M $110 million In revenues is expected to be raised in The Florida Coaltion onSmokin& OR Health has filed legislation for 1r3 from the new tax. While the Massachusetts constitution pre- the 1993 session to raise the Florida tobacco tax by $1.00/pack. The vented Question 111 from requiring the leggislature to appropriate Coalition includes the Florida divisions of the Amercian Cancer theserevenuesforaspecified purpose, thatfs,fortobacco prevention Society, the American Heart Association, and the American Lung programs, ACS, STAT anri other groups in the state are working Association closely with the Govetnor's office and the state Departments of Public Health and Education and the legislature to assure that the The Coalition estimates that smoking-attributable economic costsfor entire amount will go for a massive campaign to reduce tobacco tobacco-related mortality and morbidity in Florida are In excess of addiction. $2,5 billion a year. The proposed tax is intended to alleviate this burden on the state's taxpayers. The tobacco industry is already waging a campai m tooppose.laps to have the funds go for a major media carirpaign o counter tobacco This should also give the tobacco industry another heavy financial advertising, forintensitetobaccoprevention programs, forincreased challenge, especially if it has to fight tobacco tax increases in New t.nforcement efforts to reduce sales of tobacco products to minors, York and possibly other states, as well as Florida, while it has to and for tobacco cessation programs for current smokers. This will be continue its battles in the California and Massachusetts legislatures a major battle In the 1993 legislative session. to divest tobacco tax revenues from going for tobacco prevention programs. As .'"+enator Everett Dirksen used to say, "a irilli£on here, Already, at the end of the 1992 legislative session, the tobacco a million there -before long we're talking real money". Industryy vigorously sought to gain passage of legislation that would have setvery weaksiatewide resitictionson sales and advertising of tobacco products and would have pre-erupted local cities/towns CALIFORNIA STARTS NEW AD CAMPAIGN from ppassing stronger laws. The tobacco industry also tried to get a AGAINST TOBACCO INDUSTRY "smo[cers' rights" law passed. Both bills were strongly opposed by STAT, ACS, GASP and others and died In committee. Had the bills shou now be with Q #1 f. ass d, they w uld have u dercuomot ofdthe programs which TheCalifomiaDapartmentofHealth Services islaunching anew $24 p million advertising campaign to combat tobacco use in the state. Following up on their very successful earlier ad campaign, financed One of the key lessons teamed in the fight against the tobacco by revenues from the Proposition 99 tobacco tax, the new ads will industry on Question 01 is that they will pour millions ofdollars Into "tell the truth about smoking and the tobacco Industry", said Dr. a state ust to fight a small lax increase because they are extremely Molly Joel Coye, the Director of the state I lealth Department. fearful that it will reduce sales and, worse yet for them that the tobacco tax Increase option will spread to other states. Ana, they are The earlier $28 million ad cam •aign run In California is estimated to absolutely ri ht on both points -see articles below on other states' have cost the tobacco Industr}, $1,1 billion In lost sales, and It plans toseek ~obaccotaxIncreases in1993. This may become another Increased smoking cessation rates threefold, Alice's Restaurant Massacre - with not just one or two but tens of slates doing it, and maybe the Federal government too! 11tenewadcampairwill bedirect,hard-hitting and1990'sMadison Avenue, not the odd fashioned public service spots. T he ads will (Cunt, on page 9) i u _ 9 r NEWS California (Cont, from page 8) STAT )11..J show smokers as lonely ppeople standing in the rain and cold to MINNESOTA GROUP PROPOSES $1.00 CIG TAX HIKE smoke, as well as highlibb~frting the dangers of secondhand smoke. Another set of ads will be released later targeted at youth, young women, smokers, and the general public. The Association for Nonsmokers-Minnesota has proposed a $1,00 per pack increase in the state cigarette lax. Minn%nota currently has The tobacco industry will be directly indicted in the ads as sellers of a tax of $0.43 per pack. Jeanne Weigum, President of the Aeociation, products which kill innocent men, women and children. The cam- said that the proposed tax hike is 'because we believe it will save paign will use the findings of the recent EPA study to point out the lives". The group estimates that the $1,00 increm,~ would result in dangers of smoke to non-smokers. about a 15% reduction in cigarette consumption. NEW YORK LOBBYIST Aswego topress, Minnesota's State Senate has passed a23c/ ackcig EMPLOYED BY EMPIRE BC/BS AND BY PHILIP MORRIS tax increase. This must still be acted on by the House and then the Governor.This would increase Minnesota s cig tax to Ile/pack. The Associated Press reported recently that New York's largest health insurer, Empire Blue Cross & Blue SWeld, employs the same COLORADO RESTAURANTS SAY NO TO PHILIP MORRIS Albany lobbying firm as Philip Morris. EmplreandPhilipMorrisare reported to both retain the law firm of Hinman, Straub, Pigors & Manning. GASP of Colorado reports that the Colorado Restaurant Association was approached by Philip Morris about helppingg ppromote the Pro-health tobacco control advocates stated that Empire has been company's"accomodation' programwhichusesiheChlnesesymbol notoriously quiet in public policq debates about restricting tobacco for harmony and coexistence and says "smokers and non-smokers use, even though it would be in Empire's financial interest to reduce welcome". Philip Morris tried to convince the Restaurant AssocIa- tobacco-relatedhealthcare costs. Paul Beyer of the American Cancer tiontosupport this campaign and, obviously, tokeep smoking areas Society was quoted by AP assaying "it's going to become more and in their res}aurants, more clear that they I ave been suspiciously absent from our coali- tion," Much to their credit, the Colorado Restaurant Association rejected the Philip Morris campaign, thanks in great measure to Colorado The New York Health Department stated that in 1990 there werean GASP 's informing them ttlhat this was simply a tobacco industry estimated $1.3 billion in health costs attributable to tobacco addic- gimmick to keep smoking areas and that It was strongly opposed by tion. Many of these costs are born by Empire and its premium- health groups concern about second-hand smoke. paying policyholders. GASP gives substantial credit to STAT Bciard member Bill Godshall, The Hinman, Straub law firm is cite of the top three lobbying firms the Executive Director of Smoke-Free Pennsylvania, for setting the In Albany, and Empire Is Its biggest client, pay inglt$126,606in1991. example of how to defeat this tobacco industrytactic, andtoInfor- Its second biggest client in 1991 was Phiip Morris. mation supplied by Stan Glantz of California. And, STATcongratu- Pro•health advocates su >gested at a recent public hearing that tales Colorado GASP and the Colorado Restaurant Association. Empire's silence on amok ng issues mayy be d ue to the Influence of Hinman,Struab. Empire'schairmin,AlbertCardone,respondedby MICHIGAN ACTS TO PROTECT CITIZENS FROM TOBACCO saying, "let me assure you, the fact that one of them fthe law firms Empire retains) also represents the tobacco industry has no impact on bow we feel about tobacco." STAT responds by saying tha, we On December 16, 1992, Governor John Engler of Michigan signed rd, oat statement, but now we'd like to hear Empire take a,, three bills designed to limit the sale and distribution of tobacco n a position on pro•health, antl-smoking issues. Also, doesn't pproducts and simultaneously Vetoed a "smokers' rights" bill backed Empire understand that there is good reason to not employ a law by the tobacco industry. firm whit h represents the tobacco industry? I )o they have smoke m their eyes? taws were enacted which do the :outlaw the sale of single cigarettes from all retail stores except those that exclusively sell tobacco products; restrict the location of to,lacco vending machines; CONNECTICUTGOVERNOR PROPOSESCIG TAX INCREASE and restrict the sale anddistributionoftobEccoproducts illroughthe. mail. Each of these bills is a step in the right direction forte ducing tobacco industry access to yout7i, but ST AT cautions others about In an effort to balance Connecticut's $8.84 billion budget, Governor using these laws as models - they do have some exceptions which Lowell bVelckerhasproposed increasing taxes oncigarettes,alcohol other states will want to avoid. and cable TV. The Governor has proposed to increase the cigarette tax from $0.45 to $0.55 per pack. I fis office stated that this increase is expected to generate $23 million in new revenues. The Governor, muc't to his credit, vetoed a "smokers' rights" bill, stating that "at a time when we must do everything possible to establish a drug-free society, SB 484 would elevate the use of ni cotfne, NEWJERSEYLEGISLATURETOCONSIDERSMOKINGBANS one of the most addictive substances known, to a protected right. IN RESTAURANTS That would trivialize our traditional rights". STAT could not have said it any better! Legislation has been filed in New Jerseywhichwould reatlyrestrict smoking in restaurants in the state. Currently, New Jersey has one ? of the nation's weakest laws in the country, requiringg only that ' restaurants post signs saying whether they have non-smoking areas. New Jersey GASP Executive Director and STAT Board member Regina Carlson stated thateventhis weak law is largelyyignoredand t•~~ that a Hea Ith Department study had found that 2 out or3 restaurants , did not post signs and 80% had failed to create non-smoking areas. r. Two bills have been proposed: one would require restaurants with more than 50 seats to provide non-smoking sections forat least 75% of their seating capacity; the other bill would phase out all smoking in restaurants over a three year period. Both bills are supported byy New jersey GASP, the American I {earl Association and the Amerl- can Cancer Association. For more information, callNJ.GASPat908 273-9368. VIRGINIA KILLS CIG TAX INCREASE The Virginia State Senate killed a proposal to raise the state cigarette .~•..a« Mho lax from just 21 /2 cents lier pack to $0.20 a pack, The tax revenues Jia4Ao~ 1 •r~M a~ww,. eww a.~~.~~r N•+t had been targeted for fund ingstate and municl le services, but the •Nb°M•m•"clerrlnlaCA"Th6moo t c„Y{w rvt•U*414ra"41&dMte!•c••Ar MOW GpMd"GWlal rAMW Gw~ 1r a+Y} wa~Mwa tN aa4 na+ah toba cco in dus try cony lncodtheSenatethatPhilipMorris,RIchmonds „•y~qMy u „N,,,e.~, ,••,,,~,,,Mi~"e biggest employer, might leave the state if the tax went through. u M1 rw°,. A geo M 7•r 1i•• li • " ti•A►w• M• e.~iwptpeheea v"• f ~I I 10 fk,:'*j LOCAL NEWS - :ITIES & TOWNS MARLBORO GRAND PRIX CRASHES trainingsandmetwith allemployeesprior toit machine" even more ludicrous. IN NEW YORK gohIunto effect. One month in advance we fold the public so people would have a chance Philip Morris thought it had the checkered to prepare. We had no problems-.. Teenagers LOCK-OUT DEVICES FAIL flag in its hands aftergettingInitial appproval still come to the mall and hang out in the food IN BROOKLINE from the City of New York to run the Mar- court section. We encourage t. They are our lboro Grand Prix in Manhattan. however, future customers. But now they don't smoke ThelownofBrookline, Massachusetts, home Philipp Morris crashed into tobacco control while here." toformer Governor Michael Dukakis, voted activlstsandhasnowannounced thatithas to ban cigarette vending machines. When cancelled the race. A second mall has also gone smokefree - the threatened with a law suit challenging the 150 store Emerald Square Mall in North law by the vending machine Industry, the Philip Morris pulled out just days before Attleboro. No reports yet of any problems. town agreed to a comppronilse under which having to appear In court to defend itself Both cities ha l regulations limiting smoking in the town would allowlock-outdevices lobe against a lawsuit filed by SmokeFree Edu- shopping malls to designated areas only, but used to see how well they worked to halt cational Services and the New York Public both malts took the initiative to go one step purchases by minors. Interest Research Group to stop the race, further and ban smoking entirely. Joe Cherner, President of SmokeFree and Less than a year into the experiment, the STAT Board member, said "Philip Morris lock-out devices have proven to be no de- sponsors autoraces to get its Marlboro logo DENVER SCHOOLS REACTTO DOCTOR'S terrent whatsoever. In a "sting" operation on TV even though it swore it would never COMPLAINT & D OP RJR "ANTI-SMOK- carried out by the town Health Department do so 20 years ago when Congress banned ING" MATERIAL and Massachusetts GASP, underage teens cigarette ads from television". were able to purchase cigarettes in 4 out of 5 A physlcian and STAT member In Denver no- attempts from vending machines which had Chemer's group had vigorously opposed ticed that a art of a Denver Public School lock boxes. the Marlboro Grand Prix coming tc New curriculum titled "Too Good For Drugs" In- York Cityy,but, with support from Mayor eluded materials called "How to Handle Peer This "sting" demonstrated that lock-boxes David Dinkens, Philip Morris had won the Pressure". The materials looked suspiciously are no more of a deterrent than machines initialbattle. Chemerandothershadargued like RJ. Reynolds materials which neglect to without lock boxes. Clerks who are doing that New York City would be plastered mention the harmful health effects of tobacco other things, such as talong money at the with Marlboro billboards during the race or how tobacco company advertising Is used to cash register or serving food to customers, and that the race would be worth millions of entice youngsters to smoke. arenotCnterestedinwhoisbuyingcigarettes dollarsinfreeTVandnewspaper advertising at their vending machines. Theclerlcscon- when it was run. The doctorcontacted the Denver Public School's sistently just Rook over at the underage manager of their Dru v Free Schools grogram customer and push the button which elec- STAT Board member Dr. John Slade of the and voiced his strong o~jection about theuseof tronically activates the vending niachIne so Coalition foraHealth}yNewJersey provided these materlals. The proggr~am manageragreed that It releases the cigarettes. New York City officials with photos of andcontactedthefirmwfiichhadproducedthe drivers cars, billboards, and even children "Too Good for Drugs" curriculum. dressed In clothIPS with the Marlboro logo SEA7-rLE SHOOTS DOWN which had been taken at the Marlboro Grand Without hesitation, the National Directorof the MARLBORO MAN SIGN Prix autorace at the New Jersey Meadow. "TooGoodforDrugs"program,CynthtaConey lands. When all the activists outcries went agreed that a mistake had been made In hi- Following a tough fight, the Seattle unheeded In the roar of Philip Morris's chiding the RJR materials and said, "we do not Kingdome announced that the Marlboro smoke-screen of how much money the race support the tobacco companies, nor are we Man sign in the Kingdomewill beremoved would bring into the city, Cherner and the supported by the tobacco companies in any next January Ist.ThTsbattle, with Washing- tobaccoconfrolcommunity challenged them way." The RJR materials ate no longer usedf on DOC and mrny other groups fi hHng In court and in the court of public oolnion. for removal. CAMP aftvr tho Kind nnnw againa a lawsuit tiled by StnokcFrce Ldtt- s! o} i in mall to des 60ed atc,:s oid), ut used it) >CC 1_10W 11 they %~ork~d to ]tali catlonal Services anoi the New York PulAIc both ma Is look the initiative to go one step purchases by minor,. Interest Research Group to stop the race. further and ban smoking entirely. Joe Cherner, President of SmokeFree and Less than a year into the experiment, the STAT Board member, said "Philip Morris lock-out devices ha% a proven to be no de- sponsors autoracesto get its Marlboro logo DENVER SCHOOLS REACTTO DOCTOR'S terrent whatsoever. Ina"sting"operation on TV even though it swore it would never COMPLAINT & DROP RJR "ANTI-SMOK- carried out by the town Health Department do so 20 years ago when Congress banne-I ING" MATERIALS and Massachusetts GASP, underage teens cigarette ads from television". were able to purchase cigarettes in 4 out of 5 A physician and STAT member In Denver no- attempts fromvending machines whichhad Cherner's group had vigorously opposed !iced that a part of a Denver Public School lock boxes. the Marlboro Grand Prix coming to New curriculum titled "Too Good For Dru s" in- York City, but, with support from Mayor eluded materials called "How to Handle Peer TFJs "sting" demonstrated that lock-boxes David Dlnkens, Philip orris had won the Pressure". The materials looked suspiciously are no more of a deterrent than machines initial battle. Chemer and others had argued like R.J. Reynolds materials which neglect to without lock boxes. Clerks who are doing that New York City would be plastered mention the harmful health effects of tobacco other things, such as taking money at the with Marlboro billboards during the race or how tobacco company advertising is used to cash register or serving food to customers, and that the racewould be worth millionsof entice youngsters to smoke. arenotinterested inwhoisbuyingclgarettec dollars in free TV and newspaper advertising at their vending machines. The clerks con- when it was run. The doc tor contact ed the Denver Public School's sistently just look over at the underage manager of their Drug Free Schools program customer and push the button which elec- STAT Board member Dr. John Slade of the and voiced his strong objection about the use of tronically activates the vending machine so CmAitionforal-lcalth hiewJersey provided thezemateriAts ThPpro ram manager agreed that itteearnmthoeigaretten. New Ycrk City offilcials with pholos of and contacted thefirmw ichhadproducedthe drivers cars, billboards, and even children "Too Good for Drugs" curriculum. SEATTLE SHOOTS DOWN dressed in clotldng with the Marlboro logo widchhadbcentaken atlheMarlboroGrand Wilhouthesltotion,the National Director of the MARLBORO MAN SIGN Prix autoraCC at the New Jersey Meadow- "Too Good for Drugs"progr"' m,C:ynthiaConey r;ollowtn tough El ht, the Seattle lands. When all the activists outcries went a}}•re , I that mistake had been made In in- R a unheeded in the roar of Philip Niorris's cl'uding the 14JR materials and said, "wc du not si sign in the Kin ~ announced tlint lie Marlboro smoke-screen of how much money vie race support the tobacco companies, nor are we Ma 6 would branpInto thecity,Chernerandthe supported byy the tobacco companies in any nextJanuarylst.Th sbattle,with Washing- tobaccocon r olcommunJtychallenged them way.' 71;e ItJR materials ate no longer used. tun IX3C and many other groups tt_Shting in court and in the court of public opinion. for removal, camr after the Km "ounly Congratulations to the Denver physician for Council approved anordinancew'lchpro- In the end, Philip Morris realized it had hit taking the initiative; to the Denver Public hibited any, tobacco advertising In county- the waill Congratulations to the winners? It Schools for acting promptlyy; and to "Too Good owned facilities. was a heck ofa ravel for Drugs" for saying no to RJR. This shows again what one person can accomplish. However, Philip Morris threatened to fight the ban In court if they were forced to re- HOUSTON BANS SMOKING IN MOST move thesi n,sayingtheyhadacontractto PUBLIC PLACES THREE MASSACHUSETTS TOWNS OUT. have the Marlboro Man in the Kinggdome, LAW CIG VENDING MACHINES andthatcouldn'tbeabrogaled, Finally,after On November 9,1992, the CI ty of Houston's much hea ted deba te, Philipp Morris caved in new ordinance banningpublicsmokingtook Rejecting pleas and then threats from the and agreed toremovetheA4arlboroManat effect, according to Houston GASP. The vending machine industry, three Massachusetts theendcfthe}'ear, They will then putsome new law bans smoking in the Astrodome, towns voted in recent months to outlaw ciga- other, non-tobacco, adIn its place, Bon Summit, all city owned buildings and both rettevending machines completely. The towns appetite, Philip Morris -your Kraft cheese Houston airports, except in certain places of Provincetown, Longmeadow, and West cowboy will look better. such as bars, private and VIP lounges and Springfield all voted to ban the machines after skyboxes at the Astrodome, seeing how easy it was for youngsters to buy cigarettes NEW YORKERS FIGHT MARLBORO . Years of work went into gaining passage of MAN IN SHEA STADIUM this law, and GASP Is encpuragift anyone The vending machine Industry pput up a fight who sees violations of t1le law o repott and pleaded for ordinances which would re- That poor Marlboro cowboy Just can't find them to the City of Houston IJealth De- quire Lock-out devices instead of the complete a safe stadium to smoke In these da~s. In partment. rravellers going through the bans. fn each case the towns selected lock out New York, Joe Cherner and Smo..efree Houston aborts are among those who can devices as being totally ineffective. Educational Services are leadingg a ma or report viol bons--complafnbwill betaken fight with Mayor Dinkin's adml-nistraon over the phone. in West Springfield the vending machine in- to get tho Marlboro Man sign In the Mets dustry sought a prefim[nary injunction to halt Shea Stadium removed, saying that It In- implementa on oftheban, utthecourt rejected fluences yy'oun sters to associate smokin SMOKEFREE SHOPPING MALLS IN their request, and the law Is in effect, as It is In and ath]etics,and that it is a. blatant attempt MASSACHUSETTS Longmeadow and Provincetown. to circumvent the ban on television adver- ti sln of tobacco, since the sigh Is so visible Massachusetts ASSISI' report's that two STATplayedakeyyrole InWest Springfield and next tothescoreboard. shopping malls in the state have gone en- Longmeadow in helpln the Boards of Health tirelysmokefree. The Assembly Square Mall obtain accurate information on how easy it is The Dinkin's administration says it agrees, In SOmerviIlebecame the first mall to adopt for minors to buy d6arettes. STAT conducted but that Its hands are tied by the contract the policy, and its management said that it "compliance checks in each of these commu- betwe :n Shea and Philp Morris. Cherner, has-been a "very, positive thing" with no pities which demonstrated that in 70% to 85% with support from STAT and many health toss of business. The mail has 68 small of the cases underage youngsters were able to groups, argues that the City call void the stores and 2 major stores. ppurchase cigarettes over the counter, and In contract because the sign is not in keeping i00% of the cases they couldbuy from vending with thecharacter and dignity of the public Carolyn Kennedy, the mail qeneralmanager, machines. Some of the vending machines stadium. said, 'we were very afral3 of what might contained both cigarettes and candy, thereby happen to business. The small restaurants making it impossible for clerks to know whata Atth14time thebattlegoes onInthetrenches, were espe-(ally afraid of losing business, customer was actually purchasing, and also, in the media and in the political arena. The We did a lot of planning, held extensive thereby, making the term "supervised ven ding (conLonpageli) x LOCAL NEWS - CI'T'IES & TOWNS New Yorkers (Cont. fn:)m page 10) cowboy will come down, you car. N., sure - but write to Mayor the methods being used to persuade them to buy tobacco products. David Dinkins, Cily flail, New Y.mk, N.Y. 10007, just to help him Since its inception in 1988, the Tar Wars project has spread decide to do the right thing. In the meantime, the battle has raised quickly. 7-he 1992-93 school year saw 22,000 more than half of the consciousness ofmiilionsofpeveleabout theInsidious natur of C.olorado's fifth-graders involved in the project. In addiction, 18 tobacco company advertising practices. Keep up the fight, Joe. other states have been trained in the use of this curriculum, which has received special recogrution and reward from the World Health STAT STRATEGY TIP: Organizatlon, the American Medical Association, and former US VENDING AZAt,F11NE BANS Secretary of Ilealth and Human Services Louis Sullivan. the simple yet effective program features a short warm-up Based on STAT's experience, banning of vending machines is fromia given fatrnily Vhysitacher, ciann to discussh oil tegrm conse• easier than most tobacco control advocates think. The following quences of tobacco use. The interactive lesson encourages students are some "qquick strategy tips" to remember when you consider to enggage in decision makin activities and to analyze tobacco taking on this issue: adve:lisemen ts. Students are then invited to create a poster focusing on the positive effects of not smoking. 1. Vending machines are of real Interest only to vending machine Posters compete In school contests with each winner displayed companies. The tobacco industry is on~lyy marginally interested in and judged a ain at the Hall of Life. An all-expense-paid trip to this Issue, and will sacrifice this rlulckly. Disney tiVorld is awarded to the grand prize winner. 2. Restaurants are a primary location for vending machines, but that U eycr je u larlypgget poossi6vefeedba k from the octo s who have restaurant owners also get little money from the machines and participated as TarWars Presenters, see this as a very unimportant part of their business. When Contact the Denver Chapter of confronted with the DOC (713-798-7729 f th Issue of going 100% smoke free and of, information on how to get started with Tar Was. ) or more banning vending machines, restaurant ownerswill quickly agree _ that they believe cigarettes should not be sold to minors and will Fed and State Taxes (Cont. from page 1) voice virtually no opposition to the total vending machine ban. ge that the vast m aj of Restaurant ownesammuch more concerned with theeconomics Statesareno move gragilyto icreasipatetax son tobacco of what it will mean to their business to go 100% smoke-free, not States are now moving rapidly to ncrease stes on tobacco [see In vending machines. articles on pages &9J, with New York recently increasing their tax by $0.17/pack and Minnesota on the verge of passing a $0.231pack tax 3. Vending machine companies will argue that lock-boxes are a which would raise their total state tax to $0.71 /pack, the highest in the 100%effectivealternativetobannin vending machirim,andthat nation. they etans ee!i to minors when ~ock•boxes are installed, and therefore, Calls for a $2,00/pack Federal excise tax increase are resounding why should they be singled out for a ban. The answer acr the d are is very simple: lock-boxes are very different from over-the- nSokinountry,anh, nstronglysupportedbySTAT ,1heCoalitlon counter sales because theclerkwho operates theelectronic device on Smoking 0[C Health, and most health and tobacco control groups. which releases the cigarettes doss not have any direct contact TheCtinton admWstratlonis giving very positive signs that atobacco with the customerbeca use thecustomerisanumberoffeetaway, tax increase will be a central part of its revenue package to support and the clerk can easily be doing other things while he releases health care reform. the locking device, for example, takengg money from another ACTION ALERT: While reports out of ashington esi customer or serving them a sandwich.ThisIsvery different from $2.00 tax Increase bereco~Ymended, sulledahata are over-the-counter We In which tie clerk takes the money to ty tobacco may r, muchs alter as crease 'above, directly (catlroMon, Phile thecustomer and can much more easily ask fox 4e i efilrelcttetsarno rtoin of this. Futttter much ml ter increase mayy ~e identifierd'd'A*IdP'reisidentB111Cl1rilon, House, Washington, D.C., urgingg him to propose the full $2.00 4. There are manv fPwor elparorln vondino rnarhMna to mnct tobacco tax increase and to include all tobacco Products, not tuat VrNI ?IN(; Nf- .11119 A ITIN17 BANS F1 If ttmdn f~erviies Louis Euliir- the situp e yet effective program features a short warm uf, Based on STAT"s experience, banning of vending machines is activity given by the classroom teacher, followed by a guest visit easier than most tobacco control advocates think, The following q orrt a participating family physician l s ediscuss short term dents are some "culck strategy tips" to remember when you consider to engage of In decision n akin tg e acvitiesandto analyze sto acco taking on this issue: advertisements. Students are then invited tocreate a poster focusing 1. Vending machines areofreal Interest onl to vending machine on the positive effects of notsmoking. comma nles. The tobaccoindustry !quickly, marginally intrested in Posters compete in school contests with each winner displayed this issue, and will sacrifice this quickly, ~d f udged aggain at the Hall of Life. all inns paid trip to Disney orldis awarded to the grand prize winner. . ject Dr. effre Cain and Glenna er re 2. Restaurants are a primary location for vending machines, but that hrey regularly pget poositive feedba k from the docto sbwho haove restaurant owners also get little money from the machines and participateas Tar Wars Presenters. see this as a very unimportant part of their business. When confronted with the issue of going 100% smoke-free and of Contact the Denver Chapter of DOC (713-798-7729) for more banning vending machines, restaurantowners wi11quickly agree `t information on how to get started with Tar Wars. that they believe cigarettes should not be sold to minors and will Fed and State Taxes (Cont. from page 1) voice virtually no opposltion to the total vending machine ban. Restaurant owners are much more concerned with the economics messa ge tha t the va st m ajori ty ofci8zensapprove ofthese health taxes. of what It will mean to their business to go 100% smoke-free, not States are now moving rapidly to increase state taxes on tobacco (see In vending machines. articles on pages 8-91, with New York recently increasing their tax by $0.171pack and Minnesota on the verge of passing a $0,23/pack tax 3. Vend ingg machine compantes will argue that lock-boxes are a whichwould raisetheirtotal state tax to$0.71/pack, theNghestin the 100%effectivealternativelobanninR vending machines, and that nation. only humans sell to minors when rock-hoxes are installed, and therefore,whyshouldtheybesingledoutforaban. Theanswer Carts fora $2.00/pact; retiesl excise tax increase are resounding very simple: lock-boxes are very different from over-the- ncrossthecotmtry anth,andrungtysuppor ctto ac co Coco he ntrnCoanuon countersalestxraust'ihecferkwhuoperatestheclcctronlcdevlce on Smoking ORllcalndmosthealthandob is l groups. which releases the cigarettes da s not have anyy dint contact lheClintonadministrationisgivingveryposttivesignsthatatobacca with the customer because thecustomerisa numberoffeetaway, tax l h carer efor be a central part of its revenue package to support and the clerk can easily be doing other things while he releases health care reform. the locking device, for example, takingg Morley from another ACTION ALERT: While reports out of Washing ton su eat that a custornerorservingthemasandwich.7hisisveiydifferentfrom g over-the-counter sale in which the clerk fakes the money t$2.00tax oincrease on cert inty thistobaccomayberecommended,ascratedabove, 1an directly from the customer and can much more easily ask fat agei jtere is d.The fdr . Further a much smaller increase maybe ldenNfication. pptoppose.'Therefdre, I cttels aretile~d n'fiw ldPretrldent8ill Clinton, Whitellouse,Washington,D.C.,ur Ing him to propose thefull $2.00 4. Tticre are many fewer cigarette vending machines In most tobacco tax Increase and to include a!I tobacco products, not just communities than people think. Compliance checks conducted Incldgareted.to -spil tobacco and roll-your-own tobacco should also be bySTAT and others have consistently found that health officials uded. it nowt over-estimate the number of such machines in their cities. The Thesenewand ro std tobacco taxes,comin on to of earsof rice vendin&machlneIndustry promotes this ideabecausetheyclaim p tobacco ° P Y increases the industry e a ban will wreak great economic hardship on them. The truth is to price the a m bo the Increase their reach of of profits, have begun that there are not that many machines, but they are by far the premium brands out s some consumers ry lo se-prl a roue. The so thhe in iindustry easiest access point for minors. Therefore, point out that the quickly ycedth need foraprice-sensitive ell ntroduced economic impact Is overstated by the industr , and try to force 9uicklynotibra s, such fora wernd Cacfgarete, which usually sell the industry to ggiive you or the halth officials a complte list of discount' brands, such as Basic and Cambridge, wich usually s where the machines are in the community - they won't do it, for under to sales. In 1982, discount brands accounted for just I% because they are afraid to do so. of cigarette sales. Taiay, discount brands have 36% share of the e market -cuttingdirectly intopremfumb;andsales. Marlborosawits 5. Conduct a compliance check before seeking a ban on vrnlding market share drop from 24.3% last year to 22.296 this year, machines. Virtually all such checks find that almost 100% of the Fearing further loss of market share, Philip Morris announced that it time, minors can purchase cigarettes from the machines. This is will drits avera a ) rice of Marlboro's b about .40/ ack. RJR very persuasive with health officials. pp 8 I Y P yuicklyfolhwedsuit andsaid itwould match this cut oritscamel and 6. Take the results of your compliance check to the local newspa- Winston brands. This could put the price below $2,00 a pack. per and the health officials- both will be Interested. These price decreasesareclearly intended toenticeyouthtosmokethe 7. Don'1 comprontlsel You don't have to -you are right! premium brands and not toswftch onLO they havestarted, Prior to the pprice cuts 1'hiliP Morris made an average profit of $055 a pack on rice I.boro's, but only $oA.9/pack o:t its discount brands 1 hus, even with a $0.40 price cut,1'hilip Morris still makes three times the profit TVrN CITIES AIRPORT BANS ALL SMOKING S%Xt on Marlboro versus its discount brands. 'Me Metropolitan Al its Commission which operates the Twin Philip Morris and RJR are currently In the midst of massive promo" Cities International A rC port has announced that effective April 19th tional campaigns )see page for PiedPiper Awards) to attract youth to ((coinddentallyy,the 19th Ispatriot's Day, heday thecolonialsfired the Marlboro and Camel by giving coupons wlth every pack of ciggarettes firstshotsforfrecdam inLexingtonandConcord In 1775), an smoking to be used to buy items such as caps, t-shirts, posters and other kids is banned in the airport. All smoking will have to be done outside- items. These multi-million dollar campaigns and now, the price cuts In those wondetful Minnesota winters as well. 'There will be no are directly pitched at attracting and holding chi~dren and teenagers smoking in lounges or special smoking sections, which Is what many as customers, airports use as a "compromise", The Twin Cities Airport is to be commended for taking such a sensible and healthy action. These tactics by the tobacco Industry are deadly serious and a direct threat to the health of youth. Discount brands and massive tobacco UOC'S TAR WARS PROGRAM advertising are the reasons for the halt in the decline in the numberof smokers between 1990 and 1991, according to Dr. Michael Eriksen, ggecoggnlzingg that physician involvement is important to neutralize director of the Office of Smoking & I fealth of the federal Centers for thetobaccnindustry shiggh-cost,high profile advertis'ngcampalgns DiscaseControl. members of the Denverctiappte, 111 C((DuctorsOitghtioCare)and The major way to counter the drop in prices being initiated b the theliallofLife,adivisionoftheDenverMuseumofRatura111istory tobacco com aniesistodrivethe rrcebacku lhro hmorestateand are collaborating on 'far Wars, a protect to prevent adolescent Federal tobacco tax increases. prx riencephas demonstrated that tobacco addiction. The objective is to help fifth graders understand Increases In price definitely cause drops in consumption by youth. TOBAt CO FREE 14 INTERNATIONAL NEWS QUEBEC GETS TOUGH WITH TOBACCO ADS Finally, the Norwegian Tobacco Act contains a total ban on in a surprise ruling, on January 15th the Quebec Court of advertising for tobacco products and rules to the effect that work Apppeals upheld the constitutionality of the Canadian tobacco ad- premises and meeting rooms must be smoke-free and likewise vertisingban. The ruling has great international siggnificance-the premises and means of transport which are used by the general Canadian Charter of Freedom is similar to the Firs iAmendment to ppublic. For this and all of the above reasons, we urge the arrangers the US Consti tution. to declare the 1994 Lillehammer Winter Olympics smoke-free! The ban prohibits tobacco advertising in newspapers and maga- zines and phases out advertising on billboards. The law also bans TOBACCO AD BAN AND NIGHER PRICES IN FRANCE display advertising in stores where cigarettes are sold. The tobacco industry had stopped televLaion and radio advertis The new tobacco and alcohol advertising ban in France, which ing in 1972, and had more recen y eliminated newspaper, maga• tookeffectinJanuary,eliminatesatmostalltradidonal marketing of zinc and billboard advertising, but pending this Tulingg,, it had cigarettes. Of special significance is the cancellation of the July 4th continued its point-of-purchase displays in about 47,000 retail French Grand Prix auto race because of the tobacco advertisingg stores. Dismantling of the displays began Immediately after the which appears on the race cars, costing French racing grou R ruling million in lost tobacco company revenues. The future ofpevent The 1991 lower court ruling stated that the advertising ban sponsorship is questionable due to this major loss. violated tobacco companies' rights to free speech The eartie( Never losing hope, however, the tobacco companies are now decision also ruled that the federal government had exceeded Soil looking for ways around the ban, through s08ecial promotions such authority in g to re as a line of clothes featuring the Marlboro 0- tryingtilatead vertising. The success ul appeal re~ected both of these arguments. Ali three Earlier this year, the French National Assembly approved a 30% Appealcourijudggessaid thelawwaswithin thefederal jurisdiction price increase on all tobacco prodticts. Said a member of the and the Constituilon gave it the right to look after public health. Assembly, "It is essentially for young people that we want to act to Two of the IIudges ruled that the government has the right to make discourage them from starting to smoke and becoming slaves to a It difficult #or Tobacco companies to promote their products if it habit they can never get lid of." believed this would help reduce a serious national health problem. This great victory is expected to encourage more countries to AUSTRALIA ADDS NEW WEAPONSTO WARON SMOKING Impose advertising bans. When the tobaccndustry lodged lodged an- The November 2 1992 issue of stated other appeal, claiming advertising does not t e encourage people to smoke, one of the Appeal judges pointed to the industry 's own that by this summer bold-print admonitionssac asinstsmo dngmust documents for proof that tobacco companies use ads to keep cover more t than several Q the tough cover of c g~tatfons b sot In Australia. no smokers smokingl Before the ban, Canadian cigarette companies This Isjust regal 8 spent an estimated $100 million a year on advertising smoking areas are expanding quickly and pubs are among the few The bruised but not broken tobacco industry continues to pro- places where smokers are welcome. mote Its products through sponsorship of sports and cultural Another proposal under consideration would require generic events. It cleverly sidesteps the Canadian government's ban on the packaging of cigarettes. The brand name, printed in plain type, use of cigarette brand names for sponsorships by setting up special would be the only distinguishing mark. compa es named after theircigarettebrands. Anti-smokinggroups Australia is even breaking new ground In targeting a total are now urging the government to tighten Its advertising restric- phase-out of tobacco industry-s nsored sporting events by De- tions even further to prevent the use of cigarette brands in sponsor- cember, 1995. On December 23, 1992, the Australian House of ships. Representatives passed the Tobacco Advertising Prohibition Bill banning all forms of tobacco advertising except in retAb outlets CANADA IMPLEMENTS BOLD NEW WARNINGS Including sponsorships. In March, Benoit Bouchard, Canadian Minister ofNational Health There is however, a sponsorshlp exemption for international Is the and Welfare, announced lrn fementation of a new requirement for reasoeventsn that which New involve Zealand three or more countries. (Could this a the soon er health warnings on packs of cigarettes. New warning e has ,s labels include, 8 WirilleldCupTNewGuinaorFl~iust been een offered a of[ereda place place, SMOKWG CAN KILL YOU three countries are needed to turn the Winfield Cup Into an inlema- tional event.) CIGARETTES CAUSE CANCER Whi!e the tobacco industry threatens to take the matter to court, CIGARETTES CAUSEST'ROK13 AND HEART DISEASE the government isstandin [lsground,saying that Ithastheright to SMOKING DURING PREGNANCYCAN I ]ARM YOUR BABY CIGARET'T'ES CAUSE FATAL. LUNG DISEASE act In the Interests pubs c health. This view will be supported ~y TOBACCO SMOKE CAN HARM YOUR CHILDREN die recent decision of the Quebec Court of Appeal. (see arHc e, Fx•Inw) sltw!s. Dismantling of the displays legau Intrmdu3tely after the w c nrpenrs en .e rim cars, me mf; French raring Frrnf q "if million to lost tobacco company revenues. The future o evenl rulin Th due to this major loss. he 1991 lower court ruling stated that the advertising ban sponsorship questionable violated tobacco companies' rights to frees h. Tike earlie Never lis sing hope, however, the tobacco companies are now decision also ruled that the federal government had exceeded its looking for ways around theban, though special promotions such authority in trying to regulate advertising. as a tine of clothes featuring the Marlboro logo. The successful appeal rejected both of these arguments. All three Earlier this year, the French National Assembly approved a 30% Appealcourt judges said thelawwaswithin thefederaliurisdictlon price increase on all tobacco products. Said a member of the and the Constitution gave it the right to look after public health. Assembly, "it Is essentially for young people that we want to act to Two of the iiud es ruled that the government has the right to make discourage them from starting to smoke and becoming slaves to a it difficult Cor obacco companies to promote their products if it habit they can never get rid o brlieved this would help reduce a serious national health problem. This great victory is expected to encourage more countries to AUSTRALIA ADDS NEW WEAPONS TO WARON SMOKING impose advertising bans When the tobacco industry lodged an- he November 2, 1992 issue of American Medi al News stated other appeal, claiming advertising does not encourage people to The N er bold-print sue of A n ainsts NeOkin w must smoke, one of the Appeal judges pointed to the industry's own by stimmer 8 documents for proo that tobacco companies use ads to keep rover more than Q the cover of cigarette pa sold in Australia. smokers smokingl Before the ban, Canadian cigarette companies This is Just one of several tough new regulations Ing instituted no spent an estimated $100 million a year on advertisin . smoking areas are expanding quickly and pubs are among the ew The bruised but not broken tobacco Industry continues to pro- places where smokers are welcome. mote its products through sponsorship of sports and cultural Another proposal under consideration would require generic events It cleverly sidesteps the Canadian overnment's ban on the packaging of cigarettes. The brand name, printed to plain type, use ofcIfarette brand names for sponsorships by setting upspecial would be the only distinguishing mark. companesnamedafter their cfgaretlebrands. Anti-smokinggrous Australia is even breaking new ground in targeting a total are now urgingR the government to tighten its advertising restrippc- phase-out of tobacco Industry-sponsored sporting events by De- tionsevenfurthertoprevent theuseofcigarette brands Insponsor- comber, 1995. On December 23, 1992, the Australian House of ships. Representatives passed the Tobacco Advertising Prohibition Bill banning all forms of tobacco advertising except in retail outlets - CANADA IMPLEMENTS BOLD NEW WARNINGS including sponsorship-,. There is In March, Benoit Bouchard, Canadian Minister of National Health however, a sponsorship exemption for International events wl>ich involve three or more countries. (Could this be is the and Welfare, announced Implementation of a new requirement for reason that New Zealand has lust been offered a place in the stronger health warnings on packs of cigarettes. New warning WinfiddCup? New Guinea or Fiji may also be offered a place, since labels include: three countries are needed to tum the Winfield Cup Into an i Mema- SMOKING CAN KILL YOU tional event.) CIGARETTES CAUSE CANCER While the tobacco industry threatens to take the matter to court, CIGARETTES CAUSE STROKE AND HEART DISEASE the government lsstanding itsground, saying that it has the right to SMOKING DURING PREGNANCY CAN HARM YOUR BABY act in the interests of public health. This view will be supported by CIGARETTES CAUSE FATAL LUNG DISEASE the recent decision of the Quebec Court of Appeal. (See article, TOBACCO SMOKE CAN HARM YOUR CHILDREN below) These messages will be printed in bold black and white letters PASSIVE SMOKING TEST CASE WON IN AUSTRALIA covering 25~~ o the two main package ands. Last May, a 65-year old Sydney psychologist won a landmark Said I~ouchard, "This measure Is par of our government's con- case on passive smoking. With the backing of the Non-Smoker's tinued effort to reduce tobacco use b ensuring users are more Movement of Australia,LfeselScholemsued herformer employer, aware of the health risks associated with smoking." ironically, the New South Wales Department of Health, alleging that she had been exposed to environmental tobacco smoke &.g that OLYMPIC GOAL: tween 1974 and 1986 while working as a counselor at a community SMOKE-1-REE WINTER GAMES AT LILLEHAMMER health care center. Calgary, 1988 was the site of the first smoke-free oympic games, Scholem claimed that the smoke had exacerbated her asthma closely followed by AlberMile and Barcelona. The arrangers for once entirely reversible, with the help of bronchodilgtors. Jhe those Olympic events also made an agreement with the World conditiongventuallbecame irreversible, causing considerable is- Health Or antration, European Office, about smoke-free gamest ability and leading to emphysema. We hope Te Lillehammer Olympics will follow this positive Inter- Dr, Brian Learoyd testified that he had notified the Health national trend, for the following reasons. Department in 1973 of the dangers of second-hand smoke, but the Department did not implement Its own smoke-free ppoolacy until Smoke-free games respect the athletes' need for clean air In 1978. At that time, the policy was applied at the main offce, but was order to perform their best and assures plenty of fresh air for Inconsistently applied at other agencies and offices run by the employees a, d spectators. Health Department. Schofem'sworkplace was notsmokefree until 1984. Smoke-free Olympics at LWehammer reinforces the concept Schofem and one other employee were the only workers In their that sport, health and freedom from tobacco go together, and building who did not smoke; most of the patients did. For reasons projects a positive image of Norway. of prlvacy, testified the ppsychologist, she often had both her door and windows dosed. Altltou she allowed smoking in her office We therefore urge that the LWehamm:r Olympic Winter Games In at first, she later became confident enough to ask her visitors not to 1994 be declared smoke-free with the following guidelines: smoke. While Scholem was examined by six different doctors for the Indoor arenas, as well as canteens and offices are totally defense, only one was called to the stand. The defense testified that smoke-free. there were no medical studies on nonsmoking adult asthmatics who had been chronically exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, On-duty Olympics personnel may not smoke at all In any area. hence there was no evidence that repeated exposure to such smoke would make asthma chronic. Outdoor arena spectators must be urged to refrain from However, the plaintiff's lawyyers quickly pointed out that many smoking, substances which precipitate asihnia attacks, including western red cedar dust, can cause irreversible asthma if long-term exposure was Tobacco products must not be sold In Olympic arenas, maintained. The prosecution contended that it was likely that including areas designed for competition, exhibition, cultural environmental tobacco smoke had a similar effect, and it was also activities and services. likely that no prospective study would ever be done, since physi- 0111. On page 15) 1 15 Australia (Conk. from page 14) cians generally agree that asthmatics should not be exposed to 4. Setting up an effective enforcement network tobacco smoke. 5. Banning the sale of "kiddie packs," During fourdays of cross-examh cation the defense tried to prove thatScho-lemwasexaggeratinthe ;izeofhermedicalbillsandthat BRITISH RESEARCH PROVES EFFECTIVENESS OF AD BAN she had anincome apart from herhoaalrtnetssalary.rinally Advertising bans do reduce tobacco consumption, according to thedefense agreed tosettle for . The 60, including Dr. Clive Smee, England s Chief Economic Adviser for the Depart- verrefusedictd d. by by the defendant. The jury took only four hours to react a ment of Health. In his recent research Dr. Smee explored the link In the end, between advertising and tobacco consumption in four European settlement of $64,000 Nis. Scholem was awarded $85,000 and received a net countries - Norway, Finland, Canada and New Zealand. pKey against the D~partmenf of Health. A modest findings include: settlement, perhaps, but one that sets an Important legal precedent. 1. Countries with stronger controls on advertising have lower NEW ZEALAND STUDIES CIGARETTE PACKAGING consumption of tobacco. New Zealand researchers recently investigated the possible ef- 2. In individual countries, "the balance of evidence" based on fects upon perceptions by youngsters of health warnings when study of the relationship between advertising spending and con are presented in sumption over time shows that "advertising does have a positive cigarettes plainppacka ging, Theplain pack concept, Involves a plain white package fealutxng only the brand name In a effect In on the four mconsumptiontion."s wish bans on advertisin where there was uniform typeface, together with obligatory information such as enou h evidence for ro e stud g p wam labels and contents infornia on. The study, conducted P P y, tae bans were found to reduce with 568 teenagers yielded Interesting results. significant drops in consumption (see chart.} Recall of the health warning was significantly higher for plain Smoking opponents in England hope these findings will con- packs over brand packs. The authors concluded that while most vince the government to finally Institute an advertisinban. The teens are aware that health warning exist oncigarettepacks,limited British government's official position ,on a ban up to this point has attention is directed to them when they compete with the colorfu) p images of the brand packs. Requiring tobacco companies to sell been "wait for more conclusive evidence." The Health Lk~partment cigarettes in plain packs would not only Inhibit the promotion sell has published and released the report for public consultation. They cigarettes, but may actually Increase the effectiveness of health anticipate an z"chouring annge ge of public support, eventually bringing warnings which are placed on ppacks. about the d esired ch, The next opportunity for the ban to be The authors also speculate that over time, other forms of adver- approved is at the May meeting of the Council of Health MWsters. tising and sponsorship would becom a less effective, since the learned associations between the physical product and its brand symbols would be gradually extinguished. Count Date f btlihA 1D In Corun~4on MR MARKETS CIGARETTES IN IRAN An Iranian daily newspaper recently reported that the Iranian FlnlapA ~6, 6.7% government would market Winston cigarettes under the name k BIstoon. The Iranian Tobacco Organization will sell the Bistoon - r r cigarettes in an agreement with RrIteynolds. 0811440 J4, . 489 4%! The newspaper sha ly criticize it the decision, declaring, "The government watches id~y as public funds are squandered and the NeW Zg 1. &'n i lowliest of consumer goods are Imf orted." z elve R nC r 511 "n in nllr iirriroin bettiement of $64,UOU against the Department of I ieallh. A modest findings included eN ay, t inland, Canada and New lraland. Key settlement, perhaps, but one that sets an important legal precedent. 1. Countries with stronger controls on advertising have lower NEW ZEALAND STUDIES CIGARETTE PACKAGING consumption of tobacco. New Zealand researchers recently investigated the possible ef- 2. In individual countries, "the balance of evidence" based on fects u on perceptions by youngsters of health warnings when study of the relationship between advertising spending and con- sumption over time shows that "advertising does have a positive cigaretesarepresented inplain packa$ing.Theplainpack concept, effect on consumption." involves a plain white package ffeaturing only IC brand name in a 3. In the four countries with bans on advertisin where there was uniform typeface, together with obligatory information such as g warn ing labels and contents information. The study, conducted enough evidence for proper study, the bans were found to produce with 568 teenagers yielded interesting results. significant drops in consumption (see chart.) Recall of the health warning was significantly higher for plain Smoking opponents in En land hope these findings will con- packs over brand packs. The authors concluded that while most vince the government to final[ institute an advertisin ban. The teens are aware that health warning exist on cigarette packs, limited y g l British governments official a position on evidenceeAce a ban up to this point has attention Is directed to them when they compete with the colorfu been wait for images of the brand packs. Requiring tobacco companies to sell more conclusive evi." The Health Department cigarettes in plain packs would not onlyy inhibit the promotion of has published and released the report for public consultation. They cigarettes, but may actually Increase the effectiveness of health anticipate an outpouring of public support, eventually bringing warnings which are placed on packs. about the desired change. The next opportunity for the ban to be The authors also speculate that over time, other forms of adver- approved is at the May meeting of the Council of Health Ministers. using and sponsorship would become less effective, since the leamed - associations between the physical product and its brand symbols Coun would be gradually extinguished Date of bah At^ In Const _ _ Jtlion RJR MARKETS CIGARETTES IN IRAN Norway 197 9%# An Iranian daily newspaper recently reported that the Iranian Finland 1977 t ~ - 6.7% government would market Winston cigarettes under the name Bistoon. The Iranian Tobacco Or anizatnon will sell the Bistoon - cigarettes in an agreement with Rgl.e olds. Canada J ' Jan 1989 4% The newspaper sha ly criticizerl the decision, declaring, "The government watches idly as public funds are squandered and the New zea!a"fl ''`C c)qO' lowliest of consumer goods are imf orted." ]Rg , ~r T ,x. BELGIUM FINES TOBACCO COMPANIES CHEWING TOBACCO LINKED TO ORAL CANCER IN INDIA FOR ILLEGAL PROMOTIONS Tobacco is a maior cause of cancer and death in India. The World A Belgian court has fined five tobacco companies a total of more Health Organization estimates that as much as 90% of oral cancers than 41,000 pounds for infringing advertising regulations. Philip in India canbeattributedtotobacco habitsofchewing andsmoking. Morris, RJ Reynolds, BAT Industries and two Belgian companies Estimates for 1992 from theTata Institute of Fundamental Research broke advertising rules by promoting cigarette brands tlirough attribute 151,900 of cancers in men and 66,400 of cancers in women other products not directly associated with smoking. Problem As to tobacco habits. included those for the Came] motorrlike team. Of these tobacco-associated cancers, 74% were found in the The ruling stated that indirect tol,acco advertising was a means mouth, pharynx, larynx and the esophagus. Researchers link this of promoting cigarettes and should Fe regulated in thesame wayas with the popularity of chewing tobacco. Early intervention. and direct advertising. The Tribunal refused to accept the tobacco education programs have been piloted with success, and areplanned companies' plea that the regulations were unclear and that they for expansion. were unaware of the consequences of indirect advertising. SMOKE-FREE NOVA SCOTIA TARGETS LEGISLATORS Let's Take Anion on ~ In its July H1992 ealth check, The Nova Scotia Council on • ~ Smoking and Health found that 64°/, of retailerswere willing tosell to children obviously under 16 the legal age; 18% of those stores S HeWv.. were willing to sell to minors even after the children admitted to wJlrtS iz being under the leggal age; a siggnificant number of retailers sugg- gested that the chi]dren buy "kiddie packs" - of r5 -__Wr AcionmSe"iny,nd lkdiA I A SHIAa 2 packages ,IKreVrun, raahn ce nennno4m VIM. \ewl ciggarettes; females were successful in their purchase attempts 74% 190 whenwe to rree h" ro ami mains ofthe nK timeand males 39%of the time, ,rarer on ndiu v4"I hon aQ.,enluatl, drone c J"k rmawmiar fmm IM air Our Thedata tvasdisturbing to the Council, particularly when viewed ~defut.rnd<.rM,kiembe at%ad«w<f ar when ASH riled a p<Iiibn I° toamio mn. In light of student attitudes revealed in its 1990 survey, where: uy eerlianrw airplanes. ruder we enp, r .n 1 ban an all annex k n.rhhl 36% of students who smoked fel t they aught not have started if a "tom"i' t~ wr "nor rn oms edAS 'Iertalrro cigarettes had been more difficult to buy. a 4M Miro ra or dr..s Caro tot inrlweneIof the 13% said they would quit if cigarettes were more difficult wbarrp ' an Claire W"All" an ycw # to bu l H9, 5y adddin adinj yi yy lr ASH wr soin ro 95% of students who had ever smoked first tried smoking At ni"""a,r►«e r';~i" , before age 16; the average age of initial use was 12. 1"e loapr~eeei1~'k,aha.adherore,~. p 100l(F mIa.mTin Ile<p,pun Declaring theTobacco Restraint A, t of 1980 "universally ignored ACWN ON Imp m A*4 v _ I ppo, h and unenforced," the Council released an attractive flyer expplain ro„w ON j ing the roblem and urging readers to demand action from ] Item- bers of fhe Legislative Assembly. In fact, the flyer includes a pre. r I h„r rn,k,wd al,r drdu, hlepdird _ro ArIp AS14 , printed, self-mailing, tear-off portion with a list of "recommenda- ~nahl,,VlW411h tions" for legislators. I rm end. r l i S r net w c n.urc Ihm l wail near, the A, I,,l Specifically, the Council is seeking support for government nns earnp,ndl1r,i,hRr,re+ action in the following areas: [1Pkw wnd,ddiermal inh..ireev ehml AS 14 1. Raising ilte age of legal purchase to 19 2. Banning cigarette vending machines ' . <w 3. 1.icon.cing retailers to s0l cigarettes and impose heavy fines for selling to minors O i hews Le4xs i ~ ~'~zJ M~ASuRE (7~ 7N~" 0937' c7~ rBACCO S,~aKIN(; , l~ co iII tfu vitkvAbw e 4eee-m Q.1 -QbS W (4e Smo 1: a -~r T. See - ilv a tS 5LH C&J, C&A,31dM Ae We r~ K~ n_S{a~.frs fTc -f~ q3q, leg d. C& ea e,,c~ yeevz l~ ,Syvro Kc~~ edcln a~ ease c ea-6 cz a iz-2 sl~ U dY wit pAe Ja.~j, a,r wvt one weeK, W-e, yn fJ -fit A ,k,(~3T Ili akm I/Sc~ h., f a die jy~?"C#"j U t. ~ f,bJlf CG cCRI ~o V' red m ea nl vt~apl~ IMP~J ~ Syn~Ct~ s~ sh~s , we tnee~ ~a ~,1.~w haw » ~ee~-o YNaGK((~G A~►S(fZ See tf~ a,t~he ¢lcl~ 17 f7 Pr AVA If ) i7 y3 i a ~c CA LCccLArNG yam. C~rr~t, a3t-t~ e~_ .lQ 4 A`~ cue..? _Sa~aee _ t 3 t c?~-a cea'C1. c (d rre~.f ~.rut~V - = w8~~~ dew ~ t 5'~ r ue.t ~yr S CLtit",441, Jim X84 .24 X..~j"0 d, ~d ILLS Ott, m 1+1~R alla. ~Rrfxe ~7~~ ~8~'~► - ~b~n~~'~G~ 5~0 aA^~_ _ ~Q - - - , J v ~rf gis f eale. it 4;o ;L"l? +e w arc la~e+ )-vg~~ ~-,o a rte. - wkse ba , cue _ C«,G.e, MtI~), 6 77, ~u G°*~e~cf ID {~0trn' tL~CL ~ta,U r}-cr ,may: i r. A 9 a+ rq 1`~'~ FOREWORD Reducing the Health Consequences Twenty-five years have elapsed since pubticatioa of the landmark report of the Sur- of Smoking icon General's Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health. By any measure, these 23 years have witnessed dramatic changes in attitudes toward and use of tobacco in the United Slates. The health consequences of tobacco use will be with us for many years to come, but those consequences have been greatly reduced by the social revolution that has occurred during this period with regard to smoking. Since 1964, substantial changes have occurred in scientific knowledge of the health 25 YEARS OF PROGRESS hazards of smoking, in the impact of smoking on mortality, in public knowledge of the dangers of smoking, in the prevalence of smoking and using other forms of tobacco, in the availability of programs to help smokers quit, and in the number of policies that en- courage nonsmoking behavior and protect nonsmokers from exposure to envixonmen- tal tobacco smoke. These changes and other significant developments, as well as the overall impact of the Nations antismoking activities, are reviewed in detail in the in• dividdil chapters of this Report. Based on this review, five major conclusions of the entire Report were reached. The first two conclusions highlight important gains in a report of the preventing smoking and smoking-related disease in the United States. The Iasi three Surgeon General conclusions emphasize sources of continuing concern and remaining challenges. Tle conclusions arc: I. The pre valence of smoking among adults decreased from 40 percent InI%S 1989 to 29 percent in 19b7, Nearly half or all living adults who ever smoked have quit, 2. Belween 1%4 and 1905, approximately three-quarters of a million sawk• Ing-related deaths were avoided or postponed as a result of decislons to quit smoking or not Do siorl. Fach of these avoided er postponed deaths repre• Executive Summary sented an average Bain In lire expectancl of too decades. 3. The prtve el a of sm`arr_t9 itm na na s blither imonQ 6Tncks, blue-collar workers, and less educated persons than to the overall populatIm The decline Insmoklngbasbeensuhstanliallyslower among women than among men. 4. Smoking begins primarily during childhood and adolescence. The age of initiation has fallen over time, particularly among females. Smoking US AENi OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES among high s6ool senlors leveled off from 1980 through 1987 offer prr• . D Puhtk Health Serda vlous years of decline. Centers for Diaeaea Control S. Smoking is responsible for more than one of every six deaths In the United Center for chronic Disease Prevention and Hulth Promotion Stales. Smoking remains the single most Important prevtnlable cause 4 Olltce on Smaklrq and Health death In our solely, Rockville, Maryland 2oesT ` k P rx4 THE LL\Ct I cell } i city 23. 1992 ! Mortality from tobacco in developed countries; indirect estimation from national vital statistics jJ1rjitA" PF ro ALA.\ D. LOPEZ JILLL\.1 BOREW M MICHAEL THtrx CLARK HEATH, IR Prclcna:d cigarette smoking rauses even more killedatolderagesareonaverage alreadyalrWE0 :dates `tent other diseases 111an srom lung cancer. In years old, however, and might have died soon developed countries, the absolute age-sex-specific, anyway, but those killed bytobaccoat3549lose anj lung cancer rates can be used to indicate the I iverage of about 23 years of life, approximate proportions due to totramo of deaths At present just under 20% of all deaths to not only from lung cancer itself but also, indirectly, developed countries are attributed to tobacco, but from vascular disease and from various other this percentage is still rising, suggesting that on categories of disease. Even in the absence of direct current smoking patterns !ustover?Wool those now informaticnon smoking histories, therefore, national living in develooed countries will eventually bekilled mortality from tobacco can be estimated by tobacco (,a, about a quarter Of a billion, out of a aoproximately just from the disease mortality current total population of just under one and a statistics that are available from all major developed quarter billion) tartert 1992; 339. 1269-78 . wuntries for about 1935 (and for 1975 am so, by extrapolation, for 1995). The relation between the Introduction absolute excess of lung cancer aid the proponlonal excess Ci other d Stases can only he aaproxiinale, to counmes %here ciltvtne unoking has htir corMion and so as not to overestimote the effect of tobacco it for many dccadcs, tobaNO now awvuttts for a substantial has been taken 10 be only half that suggested by a rtoporti,in td Premature deaths" Thna,raw provides :ci:::r.:'cr ear:; rniddlc se: if rn:ddic a~: tics,; sga prespcev'restudr Gf smckiny and deart4 among one million Americans. j %-W, an,i old aqe of mortality n xvc.oped cOmUles Application of such methods Indicates ttnal, in mot'bsocti during thelutfewdadtsfofthebNh=niry, f'er one p2ruL%i u country in one partic0a: qtr, in :nam developed countries atone. annual deaths tram merlxtd is to WC the Mixrnd morta!ln• nres from sariota smoking number about 0 9 million in 1965, 1 3 pteaon of d;seze, and to attribute ccui.~ PwIxi tiom of r,ilfion in 1975.1 7 m;pion in 1985 and 11 mill on Je the from atom iscuo c.tlcgonQto t:iac:t. Thcsc n1A95land hence about 21million inthedecade ttnt,unb!cpr:r:r:orsvu~'frnenccacrgn'touwrha' 1990-99: 5E million European Commurity, 64> beitttt larcest for luzzig cutocr, upper xtc-Aspcsd`'e emccr mti con USA, 5 million former USSR. : mditon and chaortic 1bAEMcUvt Ptiumnim disase (COPUI, -~5errn ~n nn,^.r E':ropa. and : rrt'il~on '!;e'AhFre _ (iii, Australia, Canada. Japan, and New Zealand)) ADOM LS imperwl Cadeer gewvch fund Centw Studies More toan half these deaths will bp, at 35-89 years of un't, vl ivanlt. or We'll, INA& fN tnnrmsey, Qererd 0x2 ages: during the 199th tobacco will in developed er*e. UK (1`101 # Ina nhs. J eaeham. met: fe!►tce d, HhAUr Unit, Warid MhentA ON*mwven, Cene.a. ewiLenend to D countries cause about 30% of ail deaths at 3589 LOW, Pnn,; end Cprdemleldgy U,14. Arnsacan rrn~9-S,xiA'. (makirg it the lariest single cause of premature Atiams. la"ia, use (err. Than. MO. l C,+woonr'rnr. I* Rd RRhrd rata. dearth) plus about 14% of all at older ages, Those A4 Sammty. Mar 13. 1999 stsmuncyae yy Male Smokers Seen Losing 18 Years -rise thaw w°do not smake or quit ` m~ be,wt ttir peopis wins seer Effect on Life Expectancy Far Greater Than Estimated, Study Finds ;n V,Atlanta ' act',~ wrote lime ~m o.oer giant with By Michael Spence tea facton such a obesity, high v terriewe with relative d 1,394 G.H. Milkr. directtt of Studies as v.yp.~ two u,a+,.. blood pressuet. high cbdegtem and pmwpk rla diet, ad wiN aioudr Smoking. and Robert 1. Myers, fit- combine who smoke titaretets tL4t combine to lull it g - 1 kaetviews d m ntdody geiectad mer chief notary for the Social So their live wt8 die War. shows a popdaboo4and study soup d 3.914 aduha who lived in curia Admiamitroboo. throughout Qepttie and ttndeesible dif• Etie fens 1972 to 1974, the to- As men get older. the smaken ly It yearn earlier than mm'wbo fseesea to We eapectaow between thous vere able to consom health die in fat peter numbers. Among never start, according to a seer ate tlfatisot smolders sd char who status directly with snreking. The mom ago 60 to 54 in the ottdy, for dy of the smoking habit of all reeves snatch. According to the rtsmarcbers divided the groups into eranple. 38 Wow were detbise adults who lived and died in Eric, report, the averye 30•yareld smokers, nomammolim and former smokers (maulng they started Pa., between 1972 and 1974. mss whet smoked amid empett to anWivers whom they were wermpraX 31 per. The ddertme is In buyer than dim at ate 64. The 3"imr old who They aged population i forwtio i cent at Pei smoked and 20 percent root other estimates of the time hawse etasoed could , to bra to provided by the state bakh depart. had quit. (Tbe rt a smoke pion or smokins cuts oft a n=-& kite, and It be 89. Ad sutstia wen sdjeeud mot as wed u federal beakh sta. cipm) 4 the ate of 85 only 53 is ono of the fuse such attempts to to wooemt tat such aver of early tistim to project average tike ea9ec• petcent of the livius on were life- catalogue the effects of smmkine in death u homiode and car acci• taaaa for the different graupe. wive smokers and 31 percent had m enure m»mommmuy war a spook dada The differenaa 8K amdler Tbey could then compere those av never smoked. Newry 48 percent of time period Eulw prowboss by with batting ate. enter with what they had dwov thaw stir alive were former amok- the Amencan Came Sooety and Throtto . estenwe telephone Bred in their research. en. the Veterans Admwweoom re- paned differ eoca of between se" to and mine years in life expectancy between conmmeng smokers and ncosmokers. 'The data from the ptesmt re, march indicate that a JVIWald man who smokes will reduce big we tsmoctamer. on averW, by about , oee-latesb.' wrote the sathon of the sudy, pobfished in the ct-rtent isms of t.ont ingenoes, the basal of the Amerian Aademy of Actu- aries. The report dirtcty compared psopie who never start &makng with thou who never stop. Most other such studies attempt to bleed in the mullions who have smoked. bud Omt The rel Bois" between amok. ky and disease has loot been be- yew 90eMpmt. Erprta sty smakim his merry 490.000 people in the Utritad Sew ash yeu-e w=. be fur more the one d every act daeda it the am=y. Eabimetr of this so m it of time sdmmldq take off a persa's 16 have normally ranted between five lid It yeas, depending on how mega people ameba and for her INC. Bit k bu ee, t ben am to pie deem entty how much srmaY1 9 redoes an avenge We span, be- aua ago many factors an Contrib. ute to hart dames, cancer and stroke, the W&M causes, of smolt- uyoreu tea oestna. in 94M the difficuity reflects the Not that most studir mmi a any i dente C•stfiou.= Eve wbm someate din of bars dasaa and ,ss a heavy smolder. researchers amok be aboaknely testing the "exh eats c,.sed by eft*mg. Of. E Y i SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT TOBACCO ISSUES U.S. GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS i AGENCIES DEPARTMENT OF AOAICLA.TURE BWgel Coritrd W An*" Dlviaan HorIll on Ia6e00 12th Spset 6 Je6ersen Or, II W. A uNnOM 0 C. 20230 support Dropr.ma. Wa 7206176 OFF CE Of U 9. SURGEON GENEPAL Hue)n H Hun Dlwy Buldkg kwt.rim r.gartkrg madc.l 200 kdepandsrla Ave 6. W. "P$M d smoking ad he.kh Wu"bn D.C. 20205 and Sw9son O.rw.l'1 tkrpas, RM) 2156167 OFFICE Of SMOIGNG AND HEALTH Cener br Chra,o Dowse Oerwrr Hormation w amokkq 1000 Calton Rd., N.E tud heaan Adusa, O"i. X= P,bk ktam itim Brand. (4p01 166.0703 Tsclw" Hamapon &anclc 1404) 4665706 FAX: µ011166y936 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINI TRATION 10SHA1 Cw Perk AlrO NO n Aw., N W. k4wratort on %baxo soak. 200 NTM DC. . 2M 2021p . u a wak*W411,04 harrd. I+ WnNngton r Assist" Sscrel Ofrco 1202'1 3276091 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 'A'Alerside Wet Buadky WomWlcn M Cor.ld of 401 M Stl S.W. DWirion of wow, eta., r wnfin4brt CC . 20460 by W.c uestances Dubk Hormatipn: 12M) 26067751 FEDERAL DECOMMISSION 601 Str)at i PerwVKWU Ave, N.W. kionna:an on unto prisoom Was"fort D.C. 20560 end daep%l adveftirv of "k Main: (202) 7262160 o"umer products. NORTH AMERICAN PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS ADVOCACY INSTrTUTE 1770 Afads aWa Avanrw. N W. "a 600 Polisarche SM Provides kicrmauon wmNrvtat DC 200365116 on a was val co pibk (202) 639-N7S ksaret bpcs kxkrdkp emokktq. AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY 1399 Clifton Rd, N.E. WWRWOn anaa bbaxo-reoeg f Arms p 30n cenurs: emokln66.e.ran /ad.rtko• AME 3RIUCAN= 7HEA bgiow factors few" to Inakkq, 1 AMECAN RT ASSOCATION 7272 Or.arwds Am. Namaran IlbOta IOD)006nWd Delos. Tuns 75261.4596 he.rl doses axle stroke: 1rl44Yg x2111 7736M Costow programs. AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION 1740 Bro.nwmy Honrrebn abod bbepo-l.Yed New York New Yorlr 10019 Cfeortie keg dieaw sva" End 1242) N6 e7o0 pregrurry, emoklrg eeesstbe progrlml AMERICANS FOR NONSMOrfEAS' RIGHTS 2570 >f•. Pabb Av.. 6". J (415)6, Calo(fo 94702 Hxmanon on 6gY66e Nn.6y (415) 641.3= nw+s r.66d b Imc," V4 ?*&M DOCTORS U-12O CAR E 3310 Orerdnar, BW. 275 HornWbn on w.yl to 9r)vat9 tlw.e k I3 79bn r677722 22 77003 of poor hens hckjd" 6r proerm -TO P TEE A bb$CW STO NAG! ADDICTION TO TOBACCO 121 Lyman 91reA 9ulr. 210 HamsbO w prermMN Mr1.q) S~rrlgraa Vallac"ens 01107 ~dditlw m bb atte. 01J1732VAt TOBACCO PAODUCT LiABIIfiY PROJErT Nalheewn Uav. S'." d IJw Moron vd pubYhea moors, 100 Hulangbn Awnw on Ilgat actions bm qlt egarlel Boston Mueachuam 02115 lobsoCO comparlos try Inldtan I 1617) 4377317 and others. I 7.7.7 H SI. N W . WAMtinpncn. DC 20001. Man en bmckiq erd Huth. 1 n.ra aonvoe, t"4'0mp ASH Is n1 "~1.isl11WI)loetenldor"oeoyno$Collbkyl0r4.n1/uW and"oVl1'f 9CANtN amewl 'II'Fob . 1992 :n Dow a ASvt. Ie" I E S O ~w, d +~taCW6 ~Ha~Tk o~ .6 /adKr'o /NAtI~TPy -Q_ M~CNA~~o~ DFJ4?q.s.7KE_ /tMEKiC~/J TQ84cc'v. II~DU