Loading...
Minutes February 07, 1989402 CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTE~ FEBRUARY 7, 1989 The City Council convened into the Work Session at 5:30 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins: Council Members Alexander, Ayero Boyd, Gorton and McAdams. ABSENT: Mayor Stephens - representing the City in Washington regarding the Green Belt. 1. The Council considered the Human Resources Committee funding criteria. Barbara Ross, Community Development Coordinator, presented the changes in the funding criteria and stated that the Committee would like to make a name change to the Human Services Committee. Council Member Ayer questioned the last sentence in the priority criteria regarding the listing of services in such detail. After discussion, consensus of Council was to delete that particular sentence from the paragraph. Council Member McAdams suggested deleting the listing of target populations from the priority criteria. After discussion, consensus of the Council was to delete number three from the listing of priority criteria. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins questioned the wording of the capacity criteria which would not require an independent audit. Consensus of independent Council. the Council was to change the wording so that an audit would be required unless waived by the 2. The Council considered the Community Development Block Grant Committee funding criteria. Connie Wells, Chair-Community Development Block Grant Committee, reviewed the criteria and stated that she and Ms. Ross were ready to answer any questions the Council had. Council Member McAdams was concerned with the wording of the project priority ranking which used "activities" in connection with several projects. City of Denton City Council Minutes February 7, 1989 Page 2 Wells replied that that was the wording from the federal regulations. McAdams stated that the wanted to be sure and use the funds for tangible projects not for paying salaries, etc. Council Member Alexander suggested including wording such as "see visible results" in the narrative of the criteria. Consensus of the Council was to proceed. 3. The Council considered plans Senior Center. for expansion of the Steve Brinkman, Director of Parks, introduced Norman Hatfield, architect for the expansion of the Senior Center. Mr. Hatfield was involved in the original design of the Senior Center, North Lakes and Denia Recreation Centers. Hatfield reviewed the plans for construction with the Council. He stated that the expansion, when completed, would look as though the entire building had been done at one time. The development plan would not interrupt activities at the Center and would not leave the senior citizens without a place to meet. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that the expansion included a Domino Room which would house 15 tables, an amount larger than current needs unless the Council indicated to the contrary. The Council considered the Park Donation Policy. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented background information concerning the park donation policy. He stated that developers had requested that before the City made a mandatory ~park dedication policy, they be allowed to work for voluntary standards. The developers felt that they would get sufficient park land through donations rather than the necessity of a mandatory policy. The Park and Recreation Board and the Planning and Zoning Commission had been working together to develop the voluntary standards. Those standards would be put in resolution form and developers would be encouraged to follow those standards. Carl Anderson, Chair-Park and Recreation Board, stated that the Board felt that the developers would police themselves and that the standards were worth taking a twelve month look at for compliance. 403 404 City of Denton City Council Minutes February 7, 1989 Page 3 Council Member Alexander stated that he wanted flexibility which allowed developers to wor~ with Planning and Parks for placement of the donated land so that the park land would not be placed somewhere unusable but rather placed where it belonged. Council discussed aspects of the draft including requiring the developers to develop the infrastructure for tne par~s, the substitutions of smaller amounts of land in exchange for development of the park and the necessity to be aware that the land did not revert back to the developer without being developed. 5. The Council considered governing street closings. the proposed regulations Roger Nelson, Administrative Assistant, reviewed the current ordinance which did not have any concrete guidelines regarding street closings. He presented the proposed regulations which included that all closing had to be approved by Council, signatures of all residents/occupants of the block to be closed must be obtained, the event should terminate in enough time for clean up to occur before the street was to be reopened, evaluation of effect of street closing on emergency services from the Police Chief and Fire Chief be required, a deposit of $25 for residential barricades, additional requirements for non-residential closings to include restroom facilities, the need for a traffic control officer, a set up and take down fee for barricades, a clean up deposit and an administrative fee. Council discussion centered on types of administrative fees, barricade fees, the difference between commercial and residential closings, the differences in commercial closings, non-profit versus profit organizations requesting the closings, allowing citizens to put up and take down the barricades and the proper time period for requesting the closing. Consensus of the Council was to include the item on another work session with comparisons of other cities having such an ordinance in place. 6. The Council considered a report on the 1989-1994 Capital ImprovemEnts Program. This item was not considered during the work session. 7. The Council did not meet in Executive Session during the Work Session. City of Denton City Council Minutes February 7, 1989 Page 4 The Council convened into the Regular Session at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins; Council Members Alexander, Ayer, Boyd, Gorton and McAdams. ABSENT: Mayor Stephens - representing the City in Washington regarding the Green Belt. 1. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the work sessions of January 3 and 5, and the regular meetings of January 10 and 17, 1989. McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to approve the minutes. Motion carried unanimously. 2. The Council received a citizen's report from Mr. Bob Woodin regarding the concept for a Farmer's Market in Denton. · Mr. John Cooper, County Extension Agent, stated that he would speak for Mr. Woodin, who was unable to attend the meeting. He stated that the area farmers had been surveyed and consensus was favorable for such a market. He had spoken with all but one County Commissioner and they were all in favor of the market. The Chamber of Commerce was taking the lead in facilitating a market. Under the direction of Bob Woodin, Chairman-Convention and Visitors Bureau Advisory Board to the Bureau, it was decided that they would act as a sponsor for applying for grants to fund a market for Denton. It was intended to present at the meeting, a proposal for submission the the Texas Department of Agricultural Diversification Board under the grants program. However, efforts had been stalled in securing a particular piece of property to act as a matching portion to the grant. At this point in time, it was requested that they be allowed to return at a later date when a piece of property had been located. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that with Council's permission, it would be helpful to have a staff person work with Mr. Cooper and Mr. Woodin in developing the concept of the Farmer's Market. 3. The Council considered a report from the '91 Committee and take any appropriate action. Jack Miller, Chair-'91 Committee, stated that the Committee was established after the 1986 bond election which was passed by the voters, to review during the 5 year span of that program, the spending of the money to make sure that it was done for those things that the voters approved. The Committee met quarterly and at the last meeting of January 25, 1989, they 405 4O6 City of Denton City Council Minutes February 7, 1989 Page 5 reviewed the projects and staff recommendations. The Committee's charge was not to determine when projects were done or how they were done, but to make sure %he funds were spent as the voters had approved. There were three items he wanted to review with the Council. (1) Library expansion - Council had requested that the '91 Committee review the proposed expansion of the library as recommended by the Library Board. It was the Committee's opinion after reviewing the material from the bond election, that the courses of action the Board was considering was in keeping with what the voters had approved. The Committee recommended that the Council consider the Board's proposals. (2) The City had some money available as a result of the State changing its requirement for funding from the City for certain state highway projects. The amount was approximately $5 million. There were projects within the bond issue that had been approved by the voters that did not really have funding available and the Committee felt it would be a wise use of the money available to do some of those projects. Those projects would include building sidewalks for those streets that were being improved, rebuilt, repaved within the bond issue projects; buying right-of-way required by the State for state projects; upgrading certain traffic signals within the City including upgrading of the signals and computerization of the signals on the Square including the Locust - Elm - McKinney intersections; and allocating funds for beautification as projects were developed. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance amending Article 17 of Appendix B, Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances relating to signs. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval). The Mayor Pro Tem opened the public hearing. Sam Marino, Beautification Task Force, endorsed the ordinance. He asked the Council to approve the passage. Euline Brock, Chair-Planning and Zoning Commission, stated that the Commission had recommended approval on January 25, 1989 by a vote of 7-0. There had been much cooperation among several different bodies including the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Beautification Task Force, and the Governmental Relations Committee from the Chamber of Commerce. She urged the Council to approve the ordinance. Bill Claiborne, Beautification Task Force, spoke in favor. He stated that the first impression that was given to outsiders coming in on the thoroughfares was one of the most lasting impressions. He felt that there was an overabundance of portable signs. The proposed ordinance would tighten up the loop holes in the current ordinance. City of Denton City Council Minutes Februa£y 7, 1989 Page 6 Bonnie Taylor, Beautification Task Force, expressed her desire for Council for approval of the ordinance. Mable Devereaux, Beautification Task Force, asked the Council to approve the'ordinance. Mitchell Turner, Appendix A Task Force, stated that this was a step in the right direction and was in favor of passage. Jack Miller, Governmental Relations Committee-Chamber Commerce, recommended approval of the ordinance. of John Cooper, Beautification Task Force, proposed ordinance would be an improvement the current ordinance. stated that the in all respects of Jeannie Morrison, Chair-Beautification Task Force, urged the Council to pass the ordinance. Mike Cochran, Beautification Task Force, spoke in favor and that in the long run, it would be very good for the city. James Singleton, Pastor-Calvary Baptist Church, spoke in opposition. He felt that the ordinance would infringe on people's rights. Small businesses and small churches would be hurt with this ordinance. Churches should have the right to put out portable signs for a short period of time announcing a special event. The ordinance could limit the number of days, the number of times per year. Council Member Boyd asked if stake signs could not used instead of portable signs for the type of announcement Singleton was suggesting. Singleton replied that often the stake signs looked worse than the portable signs and were not as durable. Lee Donaldson, Pastor of the Vinyard Christian Fellowship, stated that the sign ordinance would hamper advertising for growth of the church and cut businesses from growth until they could afford permanent signs. Ken Willingham, Metro Portable Signs, felt that portable sign advertising was better than advertising in the newspaper. He was opposed to the passage of the ordinance. Slick Smith, 3-D Sign Co. of Denton, stated that he suffered the blunt of the self-owned portable signs because those owners did not take as good of care as he did with his signs. He was opposed to the ordinance. 407 408 City of Denton City Council Minutes February 7, 1989 Page 7 He felt that the City was dictating to small businesses where they could and could not advertise. He felt an amendment for churches should be incorporated. The Mayor Pro Tem closed the public hearing. Council thanked all those who provided input hearing and thanked the members of the various worked on the development of the ordinance. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 89-017 at the public committee who AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ARTICLE 17 OF APPENDIX B - ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO SIGNS: PROHIBITING PORTABLE AND INFLATABLE SIGNS: AMENDING THE SIZE, HEIGHT, AND SPACING REGULATIONS FOR GROUND SIGNS; AMENDING THE REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ILLUMINATED SIGNS: PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSING OF SIGN CONTRACTORS; PROVIDING FOR PERMITS FOR WIND DEVICE SIGNS: PROVIDING FOR THE REMOVAL OF ABANDONED SIGNS: PROVIDING FOR REGULATIONS FOR STAKE SIGNS; PROVIDING FOR THE REGISTRATION OF NONCONFORMING PORTABLE SIGNS: PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motioned, Boyd seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins "aye." Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council held a public hearing on'the proposed annexation by the City of Denton, Texas of certain property located along the Elm Fork of the Trinity River. (A-58). The Mayor Pro Tem opened the public hearing. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor Pro Tem closed the public hearing. Cecile Carson, Urban Planner, stated that this was the ~i:st public hearing dealing with this annexation. Staff was working with Frank Martino and the area residents regarding a 100' voluntary annexation. It was hoped that all the necessary documents would be ready by the time of institution. The next public hearing would be on February 21, 1989. City of Denton City Council Minutes February 7, 1989 Page 8 5. Consent Agenda Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins asked that item 5.A.1. be removed for special consideration. McAdams motioned, Alexander seconded to approve the Consent Agenda with the exception of item 5.A.1. Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 2. Bid ~9927 - Track Loader/Motor 3. Bid ~9929 - Water Meters 4. Bid ~ 9931 - Fiberglass Streetlight Poles 5. Bid ~9932 - Fire Department Uniforms 6. Bid 99934 - Line Puller Tensioner 7. Bid ~9935 - Bunker Pants and Coats 8. Bid ~9938 - Concrete Mixer Truck 9. Bid ~9939 - Streetlights 10. Bid ~9921 - Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project 11. Bid ~9922 - Vertical Turbine Pump and Motor 12. P.O. #88793 - J & S Equipment Service, Inc. - $12,746.89 13. P.O. ~88387 - J & S Equipment Service, Inc. - $12,269.30 B. Tax Refunds 1. Consider approval of a tax refund for Title USA/First Union Mtg. Corp. - $929.00 2. Consider approval of a tax refund for Paul W. Noreen/Ticor Realty Tax Services - $893.61 The Council considered 5.A.1. Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins asked why the low bid was not being accepted. She had spoken with the company who made the low Did, which was not accepted. They had repeatedly bid in Denton 409 410 City of Denton City Council Minutes February 7, 1989 Page 9 or wanted to bid in Denton and had asked Mr. Shaw and/or others they spoke with how to get their foot in the door in Denton. Mr. Shaw had told them to be the low bidder. The owner stated that this time they were the low bidder and still were not getting the bid. She wanted to know why the low bid was not being accepted and what the legal implications were for not accepting the low bid. Tom Shaw, Assistant Purchasing Agent, stated that the items that were indicated in his memorandum SUCh as the warranty, the capacity, the hydraulic system, etc. were areas that dealt with the specifications with the exception of the warranty. The difference between the low bid and the recommended bid was $155.50. Other areas taken into consideration such as the capacity, the hydraulic system, the material that the body was made of, warranty repair center, weight of the unit and the cylinders were some of the major items. Pac Mor had bid in the City of Denton on numerous occasions in which they had not been the low bid and had bid on numerous ocassions where they had been the low bid. The City had purchased a front loader and in the past, a Pac Mor rear loading unit. THey were satisfactory pieces of equipment. In this particular instance, Purchasing chose to recommend the Rand bid based on complete standardization with 7 units currently in the fleet. There was approximately $8,000 worth of repair parts in stock to keep the units dependable and on the street. It was the opinion of Jack Jarvis, Fleet Operations Supervisor and himself that if the other unit, the Pac Mor, were purchased more money would have to be spent for additional spare parts. There would be a possible down time of two-three days if the Pac Mor unit were purchased while parts were obtained The other unit could be put back into operation within two-three hours due to sufficient stock on hand. Shaw stated that he did now want to be argumentative but he did not make such a statement to the Pac Mor individual. He did not ever make such a statement because the low bid was not always the best, responsible bid for the City of Denton. Numerous bids had been brought to Council in the past where the low bid was not the recommended bid. Every attempt was made to do so every time the low bid met specifications and was in the best interest of the City of Denton. He had talked with the Pac Mot representative on numerous ocassions on many different products. At no time did he ever indicate to the Par Mor representative that being the low bid would assure him of the business in the City of Denton. The company had not called on the City of Denton in eight-ten years and had not responded to City bids. They had not notified the City in changes in their industry and had not participated in specification developments. The only contact they had had with th@ Pac Mot corporation was through Davi~ Trucking Equipment. It was not his intention to cast any shadows on Pac Mot, they did an excellent job in the industry. Pac Mor nad supplied him with two cities as references and as City of Denton City Council Minutes February 7, 1989 Page 10 noted in his memorandum, one city was extremely dissatisfied and the other was not very complimentary. Shaw felt that after talking with the using department, with the fleet operations people and reviewing the bids as far as compliance with specifications, that the Rand unit bid by Lone Star Peterbilt was the best unit for the City of Denton at that time. Council Member Boyd asked if Pac Mot met the bid specifications given a certain parameter. Shaw replied yes, given the intent of the specifications but that intent must be qualified. Par Mot had not participated for some time in the specification development. The specifications had changed over the years with refuse trucks. If no one informs them that changes needed to be made in the specifications, they would not be aware of those changes. Boyd asked if a bid was ever done with spare parts included in the bid. Shaw replied that the dollar amount had to be taken into consideration. In this particular instance, the $155.50 was so insignificant that standardization would override that. If the City had been purchasing three trucks, where the dollars could be split for an inventory, then it would have been economically feasible to do that. Since only one truck was being purchased, it was felt that the $155.50 was best spent standardizing the fleet. There was a method to bid a total cost package where the truck, the body and the maintenance parts would be bid for five years. That practice was not really recommended because it gave the bidders the opportunity to increase the price to whatever they would like to make. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated the low bid could do the job but in trying to evaluate bids submitted to the City, it was felt that the Rand bid was the lowest and best bid. Not only because of the interchangeability of parts but also the details of the unit that makes the Rand unit a better unit. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that there was very little case law regarding not taking the low bid. It was basically what a judge and jury would find to be the lowest and best bid. Based on the poor recommendations from the other two cities and not meeting specifications along with a superior warranty, were in favor of the Rand bid. Council Member Alexander stated that it was important to remember that the City had to take the lowest and best bid and not lust the lowest bid. That was the key and in the past, the Council had rejected the lowest bid because the recommendations they had and the references were not the best. 411 412 City of Denton City Council Minutes February 7, 1989 Page 11 Alexander motioned, Gorton seconded to approve Consent Agenda item 5.A.1. Motion carried by a 5-1 vote with Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins casting .a "nay" vote. 6. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting competitive bids and providing for the award of contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 89-018 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES: PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins "aye." Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds for emergency purchases of materials, equipment, supplies or services in accordance with the provisions of state law exempting such purchases from requirements of competitive bids. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 89-019 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASES OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW EXEMPTING SUCH PURCHASES FROM REQUIREMENTS OF COMPETITIVE BIDS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins "aye." Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Denton and the State of Texas for installation of a traffic signal controller at the intersection of Loop 288 and Morse Street. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommended approval). City of Denton City Council Minutes February 7, 1989 Page 12 The following ordinance was considered: NO. 89-020 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER AT THE INTERSECTION OF LOOP 288 AND MORSE STREET; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins "aye." Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas, amending Section 21-9 of the Code of Ordinances relating to the placement or painting of signs on public property. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 89-021 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 21-9 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING TO THE PLACEMENT OR PAINTING OF SIGNS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $500.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Gorton motioned, roll vote, McAdams "aye," Boyd "aye," carried unanimously. McAdams seconded to adopt the ordinance. On "aye," Alexander "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer and Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins "aye." Motion 7. Resolutions A. The Council authorizing the Mayor of an agreement between considered approval of a resolution the City of Denton, Texas to execute the City of Denton and Sammons Communications, Inc. granting a license for the use of certain electrical duct around the proposed Loop 288 and Stuart Road. (The Public Utilities Board recommended approval). The following resolution was considered: 414 city of Denton City Council Minutes February 7. 1989 Page 13 RESOLUTION NO. R89-010 AN RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND SAMMONS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. GRANTING A LICENSE FOR THE USE OF CERTAIN ELECTRICAL DUCT AROUND THE PROPOSED LOOP 288 AND STUART ROAD; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. McAdams motioned, Gorton seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, McAdams "aye," Alexander "aye," Gorton "aye," Ayer "aye," Boyd "aye," and Mayor Pro Tem Hopkins "aye." Motion carried unanimously. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, presented the following items: A. The preliminary sales tax receipts was up from last year and was ahead of budget projections. B. The report from the '91 Committee was in need of Council direction: (1) Was it agreeable with the Council for the Library to move ahead with the next steps for architectural changes in the current library and begin looking for property donations for a future site. Consensus of the Council was to proceed. (2) Was it agreeable with the Council to utilize savings from State change in funding for sidewalks in con]unction with street projects. Consensus of the Council was to proceed. (3) Was it agreeable with the Council to utilize money left over from the 1985 street bond issue for small street projects and turn lanes. Consensus of the Council was to proceed but to also look at Orr Street between Boliver and Locust. C. Consideration of a report on the 1989-1994 Capital Improvements Program. This item was not discussed during the work session and Harrell suggested Council consider the item at that time. Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that the purpose of the discussion was to give the Council an opportunity to give direction on the process and direction on City of Denton City Council Minutes February 7, 1989 Page 14 the forms to be used to make decisions regarding the CIP program. The process was started earlier than last year in order to give input to staff before the ranking went to the Executive Staff. There would be several new items added to this year's CIP which included a bond schedule, information on the final document indicating facility operating costs for those new facilities such as new recreational facilities, new libraries, new fire stations in order to get an idea about the average annual operating costs for those new facilities. 9. There was no Executive Session held during the Work Session. 10. New Business The following items of new business were suggested by Council Members for future agendas: A. Council Member Gorton requested a report on the use of drainage channels for recreational purposes. 11. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss legal matters (discussion of Flow Memorial Hospital Bankruptcy), real estate, personnel and board appointments. The Council reconvened into open session and took the following action: A. Boyd motioned, Alexander seconded to appoint Son)a McDade Wesley to the Community Development Block Grant Committee. Motion carried unanimously. B. McAdams motioned, Boyd seconded to appoint the following to the Housing Task Force: Mark Floyd, Birdell Carstarphen, and Celia Williamson. Motion carried unanimously. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:33 p.m. 415 CI~TY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS JA~E HOPKtNS,VMAYOR PRO TEM CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS 3046C