Loading...
Minutes July 06, 1993 CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 6, 1993 The Council convened into the Work Session at 5:15 p.m.in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith; Council Members Brock, Chew, Cott, Perry, and Miller. ABSENT: None 1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss the following: A. Legal Matters -- Under Sec. 2(e), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. B. Real Estate -- Under Sec. 2(f), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. Ce Personnel/Board Appointments -- Under Sec. 2(g), Art. 6252-17 V.A.T.S. The Executive Session was not held during the Work Session. 2. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding proposed changes to the boards/commissions ordinance and gave staff direction. Lloyd Harrell, city Manager, stated that Council had asked that this item be placed on a Work Session agenda for discussion regarding current requirements for board/commission members and possible changes to those requirements. A preliminary discussion had indicated that Council did not want to make any changes but as two members were not present for the last discussion, wanted full council to consider the item. Mike Bucek, Assistant city Attorney, stated that there were some practices which the City had been doing for a number of years which might not be enforceable due to a State law which would supersede Denton's practice or a federal court interpretation which would make enforcement difficult. An example would be the enforcement of not being delinquent in taxes. While the City had a rule of not being delinquent, there were other court decisions which seemed to imply that those requirements might not be constitutional. The conflict of interest section was also a difficult section as not many cities had a charter provision which discussed conflict of interest separate from the state statute. Council Member Chew asked about removing the portion of Section 2- 61 relating to delinquent taxes. If it could not be enforced, why have it in the provision. Bucek replied that if the Texas Supreme Court had ruled directly on a Texas case, it would be decided to take it out. 78 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 2 Mayor Castleberry asked if the section would apply as it had not been challenged yet. Bucek replied that it was not illegal to have the provision but it might not stand if it were challenged. Council Member Miller asked if there had been a case ruling regarding an elected official where it had been determined that a similar provision was not enforceable. The City's Charter had a provision in which an elected official could not be in arrears of payments to the City and that had been declared'non-enforceable. Bucek indicated that he understood Council would like to change Section 2-61 which would eliminate that Section. council Member Miller asked about term limitations for board/commission members. Was it in the ordinance or the Charter. Bucek replied that it was in the ordinance. Council Member Miller stated that Council had decided at previous meetings, that term limitations would be followed. Council Member Chew replied the term "generally" had been used. Council Member Miller asked when the "general practice" would not be followed. Council Member Chew replied that it would be determined by the circumstances and the board involved. He did not want to unilaterally indicate that after three terms, an individual could no longer serve. Council Member Miller stated that if the "general practice" were followed, those Council Members with a nomination in which the member had served three terms had a very difficult situation because a case could be made for an indispensable person on every board. Council Member Chew stated that there were some specific charter requirements for some boards such as the Electrical Code Board and the Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board. That type of situation could cause a problem in filling positions on those boards. Mayor Pro Tem Smith stated that she believed in term limitations and felt it was important to have a large number of citizens serve on City boards. City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 3 Mayor Castleberry stated that new applications had been received for the Electrical Code Board at the recent seminar and he would not be against term limitations. Council Member Perry felt it would be important to leave some room to maneuver and that the exception would be applied only if it were in the strict interest of the city to do so. Council Member Brock stated that she would have appreciated a term rule for guidance this year as one of her nominations had lobbied very hard to remain after his three terms served. If there were three term limits for Council she could justify term limits for boards/commission members. Consensus of the Council was to change the ordinance language to limit terms to three consecutive full terms with Council Members Perry and Chew in opposition. 3. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding the O'Neil Ford ceremony of July 30 and 31, 1993 and gave staff direction. Mike Cochran, Chair of Planning Committee, stated there would be an exhibit on July 30 at the Visual Arts Center honoring O'Neil Ford. A ceremony would be held on July 31 at 10:00 a.m. with an historical marker placed in the Courtyard of City Hall. Following that there would be a symposium on the works of Ford in the Council Chambers. A tour of Ford structures would be available during the day and a reception would be held for the participants of the ceremony. A suggestion had been made to have plaques installed on the buildings noting that they were Ford buildings and a permanent monument sign on the buildings to indicate that the City buildings were designed by Ford. The Ford firm would design and donate the signs for the City. Grants had been received to help with the funding of the project and for the markers. 4. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding the selection of the Diversion Task Force members and gave staff direction. Harlan Jefferson, Director of Treasury Operations, stated that the Council had approved a Diversion Task Force which identified the members of the Task Force. There were four options which the council could consider for member selection~ (1) th~ Council would recommend, select and approve all members of the Task Force, (2) staff would recommend members willing to participate and Council would approve those recommendations, (3) staff would contact the various agencies identified in the resolution and ask them to 8O City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 4 submit names for Council approval such as PTA, DISD, Denton County Probation etc, and (4) Council would recommend names for the at- large seats and the individuals for civic groups and community organizations which would be 5 of the 19 members, staff would contact the agencies named requesting names for the Task Force and the City Manager would recommend names for the four city departments names in resolution. Staff was recommending option 4. If the Council desired, staff could be back in August with names for Council approval. Mayor Castleberry asked if the suggested list was satisfactory with other members. Council Member Cott suggested having more than one representative from the student body as it would affect them the most. Perhaps four representatives from that population and reduce the representation from other areas. Representatives could be from the student body of Ryan High, West High, Strickland and Calhoun. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with option four and to increase the student body representation to four members. The Council convened into the Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith; Council Members Brock, Chew, Cott, Perry, and Miller. ABSENT: None 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. The Council considered approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 18, 1993, the Special Call meeting o~ May 25, 1993 and the Regular Meeting of June 1, 1993. Smith motioned, Cott seconded to approve the minutes as presented. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 3. citizen Report A. The Council received a citizen report from Gene Lewis City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 5 regarding the smoking ordinance in view of recent EPA findings. Mr. Lewis stated that Kroger had recently redesigned the store on University and the designated smoking area was right in the shopping area. New EPA reports indicated that secondary smoke was a Class A carcinogen. Council needed to look at tke smoking ordinance for possible revisions. Cigarettes caused a large number of problems in society and should be curtailed. The present ordinance was not working in some areas such as laundromats. He felt it was worth looking at some revisions to the current ordinance. He had a handout for Council indicating more information on the EPA report. Mayor Castleberry stated that Mr. Lewis would receive a call from staff after Council had a chance to look at the material presented to them by Mr. Lewis. B. The Council received a .citizen report from Willie Hudspeth regarding staff notification to him on a zoning issue and the Council's negative reaction to development in southeast Denton. Mr. Hudspeth stated that he had a concern regarding the process he had had with the building of his new home. He felt that there was an unwritten law or attitude regarding the citizens in southeast Denton. An example was that several organizations had reported that the street area on Prairie Street near the cement plant was being polluted. He had checked on the area before coming to Council and the runoff was still occurring. The main streets in that area were not being taken care of and were in disrepair. There was a creek area behind where he was going to build his home and there were dead animals and trash in that creek. He had worked hard with City staff and was frustrated that his agenda item on the last Council agenda had been postponed and he had not received notification before he came to the meeting. Council had been notified about the Juneteenth celebration and only one Council Member and the Mayor attended the event. He asked Council if southeast Denton mattered to them. Council Member Cott stated that Hudspeth had indicated four problems to Council (1) refuse in roads and streams, (2) non- attendance at the Juneteenth celebration, (3) a difficult time building his home and (4) did southeast Denton matter to Council. On the first problem, Council received a weekly report for assistance from citizens and he requested Hud~pe~h report those items to staff to be included in the next report. Regarding the second problem of the Juneteenth celebration, he had been notified that Council would be receiving specifics regarding events for the day and they had not received that information. He requested more 82 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 6 details regarding the problems involved with building his home. Regarding the fourth problem, southeast Denton meant as much to the Council as the rest of the community. Hudspeth replied that the area was made up of all races and the common factor there was that they were low income residents in that area. Council Member Cott replied that the Martin Luther King, Jr. Recreation Center, the COPS program, and a new school had been initiated in the area. He did not understand what Hudspeth was saying that the area was not important and asked him to give specific areas to be addressed. Council Member Brock stated that she had a prior engagement and could not attend the Juneteenth events. She expressed concern about being judged for attending or not attending only one date. She had attended more events than just that one for the residents of that area. Council Member Miller stated that there was an implication that Council's not attending the events showed a lack of interest in the community. He and his family attended some of the events last year. This year he did not attend as he was in Houston as a member of the State Board of Directors for the Job Training Partnership Act. The purpose of this Act was to provide summer employment and training for the disadvantaged. He felt that attending or not attending an event did not demonstrate interest in that community. Hudspeth indicated that the Juneteenth celebration was very important. Congressman Sarpolis had driven to Denton from Austin to participate in the activities. He was the first elected official other than Council Member Chew and Mayor Castleberry to come to Juneteenth. Council Member Perry indicated that last night spent he had spent 2 1/2 hours visiting all the parks in the City including those in southeast Denton as he had done a number of times. The spirit Hudspeth was after and the concern for that part of the community was there. He had made those visits regularly to the parks. Mayor Pro Tem Smith stated that to correct the record, she helped judge the parade at Juneteenth and was on the Council at the time. Hudspeth asked Council Member Perry if he got out of his vehicle and talked to any of the people when he was touring the parks. city of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 7 Council Member Chew replied yes and that he was with Council Member Perry. They went to all of the parks and checked various areas of the parks. This was the fourth or fifth time they had done this. All of the Council except for Council Member Cott who was new had attended one Juneteenth or another during the past years. He knew that a utility crew had worked in the area of the cement.plant and was constantly addressing the problem. He wanted to know where the dead animals were so that that problem could be corrected. 3.1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance abandoning and vacating that certain street right-of-way easement on approximately 0.185 acres of land lying in the C. Poullalier Survey, Abstract Number 1006, city of Denton, Denton County, Texas, and being part of a tract of land from Robert A. Nichols, et al to Alan Goldfield, et ux, recorded in Volume 2908, Page 534 of the Real Property Records of Denton County, Texas; and reserving a utility easement therein. Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning, stated that this item and the next were related. The next item was consideration of the detailed plan to change the zoning from agricultural to planned development. The Planning and Zoning Commission had reviewed and along with staff recommended approval of the abandonment. If the Council had questions or issues regarding the zoning or abandonment, the Council might want to discuss those now. If the Council wanted to hear the zoning case first, they might want to wait until public hearing for the zoning case was over. Council Member Chew suggested deferring this item until the Council heard the zoning case. Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked where the gate was going to be placed. Robbins replied that once the abandonment and zoning had taken place, the gate would be build across the street. The area would no longer be a City street, it would be a private cul-de-sac. Mayor Pro Tem Smith stated that it would not be straight away to the cul-de-sac. It would meet the fences in the area. Robbins replied correct. Consensus of the Council was to delay consideration of this item until after the public hearing was held for the next item. 84 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 8 4. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance providing for a change from Agricultural (A) to Planned Development (PD) Zoning District classification and Use Designation for 6.427 acres of land located west of the intersection of Pennsylvania Drive and Southmont Drive, and immediately south of St. Mark's Catholic Church. Z-93-016 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5-1.) Frank Robins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this was a zoning change from the agricultural district to planned development and approval of the detailed plan. The detailed plan was what was currently built and there would b~. no more development than what was currently there. There might be some expansion of the house to the southwest. The request was for the building of a private cul-de-sac. The Planning and Zoning Commission had three conditions for the proposal (1) the right-of-way had to be abandoned by the Council, (2) there be an ideminification to the City regarding the passage of public service vehicles through the gate, and (3) the gate had to meet certain standards. Staff reviewed the security gate specifications and had already approved the design of the gate. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Bill Coleman, representing the petitioners, stated that this was the culmination of two years of work dealing with the building of a residence. There was a gate in the original plans and they wished to replace that gate as there was not an adequate way to protect property with a public cul-de-sac. They had complied with all of the staff and public comments regarding the proposal. The request would enhance the neighborhood and benefit all involved. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: 85 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 9 NO. 93-119 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 6.427 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF PENNSYLVANIA DRIVE AND SOUTHMONT DRIVE, AND IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF ST. MARK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Brock motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. The Council returned to Item 3.1. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-118 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, ABANDONING AND VACATING THAT CERTAIN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 0.185 ACRES OF LAND LYING IN THE C. POULLALIER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 1006, CITY OF DENTON, DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING PART OF A TRACT OF LAND FROM ROBERT A. NICHOLS, ET AL TO ALAN GOLDFIELD, ET UX, RECORDED IN VOLUME 2908, PAGE 534 OF THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS; RESERVING A UTILITY EASEMENT THEREIN; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council held a public hearing and considered adoption of an ordinance rezoning the land in Planned Development No. 19 from a mixed use development to the following: - Single Family 16 (SF-16) - 16.2 acres located at the northwest corner of Teasley and Lillian Miller and 136 acres located across Lillian Miller on the east side, both north and south of the Teasley/Lillian Miller intersection - Office, O[c], with conditions - 4.7 acres located City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 10 on the east side of Lillian Miller, both north and south of the "T" intersection with Teasley. Z-93- 010 (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0.) Council Member Cott left the meeting with a potential conflict of interest. Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this was a case with three different districts involved. From the Planned Development No. 19, 16.2 acres would be SF-16, 136 acres from PD to SF16 and 4.7 acres to office with conditions. The Consent Agenda had a preliminary plat for the first phase of development which was the SF16 district. The platting process had started and the staff report reflected a number of issues for dealing with infrastructure. There would be 35' setbacks for all of the property abutting Teasley Lane which was a condition of the zoning. If Council had a problem with the zoning the item from the Consent Agenda would need to be pulled as it would not be in accordance with the planned development approved in the area. This was a very large downzoning. The property was first zoned in 1984 for mixed use development and Council approved a plan in 1986. With the proposed zoning, there would be a decrease of 13,543 intensity trips from what was currently allocated. The proposed zoning was 3,868 intensity trips below the standard for the area. There were some previous agreements between private parties with respect to the wall between the property on the east side of Teasley and Sundown Ranch to the south. In 1986, the Council suggested that when the detail plan for this development was submitted, that the wall be considered. A detailed plan was not being considered at this meeting but rather conditioned office and SF-16 zoning. Since 1990, the wall had been an issue and Council had directed staff to work with potential landowners with some type of City initiated zoning case. In January 1991, the detailed plan was amended which was a strip center with an approved detailed plan. If the wall became an issue during the public hearing, he would give more details. Other buffering issues in the office district included a Planning and Zoning commission recommendation that there be a bufferyard on the northern and western boundaries where the SF16 district was proposed. If property were used for residential purpose a fence would be required if development occurred next to residential areas. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Robert Reeves, representing Nations Bank which owned the property, stated that they supported the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations. PD16 came before Council approximately two years city of Denton city Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 11 ago in a joint cooperative effort with the city of Denton for a land exchange in order for the City to build a fire station and library. There was a question of a wall several years ago since the corner piece of property was in PD19 and was now in PD 16. He wanted to make sure they were not obligated to build a wall across the street. He requested that they not be encumbered.with that obligation. R. Von Beougher, engineer and surveyor on the project, stated that he would answer any questions the Council might have regarding the proposal. Bill Esponiosa asked about the office area proposed. His concern was that there was an area which was not mentioned. That area appeared to be for multi-purpose use. Robbins stated that the zoning request for straight SF-16. The bottom lot was quite large and would probably be a church which was allowed in the SF-16 district as was a school. Espinosa stated that the entire area was SF16. Robbins replied correct. Donna Greeling stated that the term "probably or maybe" bothered her in regards to the building of a church. Her husband spoke to a surveyor that day and heard that a convenience store would be built there. Robbins replied that there was nothing in the district which would allow for a convenience store in the proposal. Only homes or offices could be built in the area. A church might be interested in the area which would be allowed. Council Member Miller asked if the large lot would be zoned SF16. Robbins replied correct and since a neighborhood meeting, the petitioner had done eliminated the neighborhood service proposal. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Council Member Chew asked where and when the wall would be erected. Robbins stated that the condi%ion in the office district stated that a wall would be built at the time the property was developed. On a lot in which an office would be built, a bufferyard would be built within that district along the boundaries. If the property to the south were used for residential purposes then the landscape City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 12 ordinance would require that when that property was built, a 6' fence would be built in the area. Council member Miller asked if the bufferyard met the standards for MXD. If residences were to the south, it would be only the area adjacent to the office which would require the landscaping and not the entire SF16. Robbins stated that there was no provision in the proposed ordinance or an MXD which would require SF16 next to agricultural or SF16 next to a training racetrack to build a buffer. Council Member Brock stated that in Robbins' presentation regarding the original discussions of the wall, he had indicated that the discussions had been between private parties. The earlier discussion regarding a wall on the entire southern boundary was not relevant to this case. Robbins replied that it was not part of the conditions. Council Member Brock stated that it was a part of a planned development which was no longer viable. Robbins replied correct. Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked Robbins to restate what could be in the southern most section of the proposal. Robbins read the list of uses for SF16. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-120 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, REPEALING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) NO. 19 ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE 84-109, BY REZONING 4.706 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF LILLI~%N MILLER PAi~KWAY, NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH TEASLEY LANE, TO OFFICE (O-C) ZONING DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS; AND REZONING 16.205 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TEASLEY LANE AND LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY AND 135.986 ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF LILLIAN MILLER PARKWAY, NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH TEASLEY LANE TO SINGLE FAMILY (SF-16); PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 13 Brock motioned, smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Cott returned to the meeting. C. The Council held a public hearing to consider the final replat of the eastern half of Lot 7 and all of Lot 8, Block 3, Wattam Addition; into Lot SR. The .758 acre tract was located at the northwest corner of Collins and Welch Streets. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that this was the final step before a building permit for the property. The property was zoned planned development which was approved by Council in 1993. The public hearing was required as State law indicated that if property were zoned or deed restricted for one or two units per lot or less in the last five years, there had to be a public hearing. This was for the Sigma Chi fraternity which was in accordance with the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Jay Minton stated that he was in favor of the proposal. available for questions if needed. He was Jack Vaughn stated that he was in opposition to the proposal. He shared a common property line with the proposal. This was a single family neighborhood with some changes over the years and he felt that the single family integrity of the neighborhood should be maintained if possible. There was a significant amount of traffic and congestion in the area and the construction of the meeting hall would only increase the trash and noise in the area. This would not be an addition to a single family neighborhood and felt that there had to be a better place for this in the city rather than in a single family neighborhood. Council Member Cott asked if it were stated that there would be control of trash and noise and stated control of parking, would Mr. Vaughn have a problem with the proposal. Vaughn stated that he would still be against the proposal and wanted to preserve the single £amily neighborhood. Thi~ wa~ a neighborhood which was in transition but was still a single family neighborhood. He was not convinced this organization would make a suitable neighbor. City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 14 Council Member Cott stated that if there was too much traffic, it could be controlled as could too much trash and noise. This was not a dorm, only a meeting hall. Vaughn stated at a meeting could take place at any hour and asked if the hours of a meeting could be controlled. Robbins replied that he did not have all the restrictions with him but that there were restrictions on hours of operation. Zoning had already been approved and Council was really only looking at where the lot lines would be. The use was already approved. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Cott motioned, Chew seconded to approve the final replat. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council held a public hearing to consider the preliminary and final replats of Lot 4, Block A of the Minter Addition, plus approximately 3.36 acres of unplatted land; into Lot 4R, Block A. The 3.589 acre site was located on the northern terminus of Newton Street, approximately 450 feet north of its intersection with Wilson Street. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning, stated that the DISD had withdrawn its opposition to plat consideration and Council could continue with the public hearing if it desired to do so. A deed restriction in the zoning required a public hearing. Council Member Miller stated that the zoning had been approved and Council was considering the plat. Robbins replied that there was no zoning consideration. Only the development. There was a lot created in two separate districts. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Willie Hudspeth stated that he had been trying to get his home started since May with much frustration in trying to do this procedure. He and his family had been saving for this house for 22 years. The location was one where there was a jail, a dog pound, and only recently a school. He hoped that officials would take notice of those who were trying to put back in to the area. He had learned through the process that an individual needed to learn how the system worked. He would ask the EPA for information on what City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 15 was in the creek behind this site. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Chew motioned, Perry seconded to approve the preliminary and final replat. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 5. Public Requests A. The Council considered a request for a noise exemption for the Pro Youth Rodeo Association at the North Texas State Fairgrounds on Saturday July 10, until 12 midnight. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that this was a request from the Sanger Chamber of Commerce for a noise exemption. There had been discussions with the Fair Association and the neighborhood regarding the noise problem. The North Texas Fair would have modifications to the rodeo area sound system in time for the Fair. H. V. Goss was against the exemption to the noise ordinance. Approval had been given to the Fair Association on several occasions for exemptions to the noise ordinance. If this was going to continue, then why have the Fair go through this. Rev. Brent Anderson stated that the church was not opposed to the Youth Rodeo as this was what the Fairground was for. He was concerned about the midnight time frame. He asked Council why there needed to be a noise ordinance if Council was always going to grant exemptions. Great progress had been made with the Fair Association regarding neighborhood problems. He was concerned with midnight exemptions. He asked Council limit the exemptions they granted. Gene Truss stated that the Neighborhood Association would like to stay on the record to being opposed to noise exemptions at the Fairgrounds. Constructive conversations had occurred between the neighborhood and the Fair Association and had identified ways to reduce nuisance factors with events at the Fairgrounds. They were all working on ways to hold events at the Fairgrounds without causing nuisances to the neighborhood. City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 16 Council Member Cott asked Truss for a suggestion of times for the two events. What were the main problems - the time, noise, or traffic. Truss replied that noise was the main problem. The neighborhood was striving to be cooperative with the Fair and they needed their cooperation to make sure nuisances did not happen. For example, the Fair could use the east side of the facility for parking and the west side for events which would put them away from the residences. Council Member Perry felt that it was not unreasonable to ask the event to stay closer to the limits of the noise ordinance. Midnight might be the closing hour but there would still be noise in the area for at least another hour. He suggested moving the time to 10:30 p.m. so that the area would be cleared in a reasonable time frame. Perry motioned, Cott seconded that the extension be granted until 10:30 p.m. in order to keep the request closer to the limits of the ordinance. Mayor Castleberry stated that Sanger had requested this site with an alternate site in Saginaw and would be a family affair. Council Member Miller asked if the event had been held here before. Tuck replied yes. Council Member Miller asked for the reason for the 12:00 p.m. request. Tuck replied that she did not know and that no one was at the meeting from the Sanger Chamber of Commerce. Council Member Miller felt that there was not enough information on the issue. The noise ordinance was written with provisions for variances. There was a Fairground in the community and that had to be dealt with. It was a county fairground and Sanger was in Denton County. He questioned if the exemption were approved to 10:30 p.m., would it defeat the purpose to having the rodeo in Denton. Council Member Cott stated that a vote would be a direct indication that there needed to be a conclusion on the issue. It was time for the families in the area and for the Fair Association to reach a conclusion on the issue. City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 17 Truss replied that there were some events held in the rodeo arena which the neighbors did not even know were going on. Last weekend there was an event without a variance and a prior event did not use the public address system. He anticipated working well with the Fair Association regarding the neighborhood problems. Perhaps the Fair could use smaller equipment for events. Tuck stated that the noise ordinance dealt with disturbing persons of ordinary sensibilities particularly between the hours of 10 p.m.- 7 a.m. and anytime on Sunday. An exemption would be necessary only during the hours mentioned. Generally scheduling was the time factor for the rodeo in order to continue with the loudspeaker. Mayor Castleberry felt that a variance until 10:30 p.m. was not significant. On roll vote of the motion to grant an exemption until 10:30 p.m., Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "nay", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "nay". Motion carried with a 5- 2 vote. B. The Council considered a request for a noise exemption for the North Texas Auto Fair at the North Texas State Fairgrounds on Sunday, July 18, from 12 noon to 6:00 p.m. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that this request was for a noise variance request for the Sunday restrictions. Council Member Perry asked if the event would require a large loudspeaker system. Tuck replied that there would be a band with loudspeakers in addition to the auto event. Council Member Perry asked if this would disturb church services. Tuck stated that Mr. Everitt indicated that they would not want to interfere with church services. Mayor Castleberry indicated that Bryan Everitt had completed a Speaker Card but did not wish to address the Council. His card indicated that amplifiers would be used only for certain areas of the fairgrounds. Perry motioned, Chew seconded to grant the exemption. City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 18 Council Member Cott asked if all events at the Fairground came through the Fair Association. Tuck felt that there would have to be some type of agreement to use the grounds. The Fair Association was requesting individuals to contact the City for an exemption. Council Member Cott suggested that the Association update rules together as it ordinance. neighborhood and Fair related to the City On roll vote to grant the exemption, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered a resolution temporarily closing Crosstimber Street between Mill and Wye Streets and Wye Street · etween Crosstimber and Mill Streets on Friday, July 16, 1993. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that this was a request closing streets for the Fred Moore/Fred Douglas School Reunion. The following resolution was considered: NO. R93-041 A RESOLUTION TEMPORARILY CLOSING CROSSTIMBER STREET BETWEEN MILL AND WYE STREETS AND WYE STREET BETWEEN CROSSTIMBER AND MILL STREETS ON FRIDAY, JULY 16, 1993; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Chew motioned, Smith seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Cott left the meeting with a potential conflict of interest. 6. Consent Agenda Perry motioned, Brock seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 95 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 19 A. Bids and Purchase Orders: Bid #1513 - Softball & Soccer Complex Hydromulch Change Order - P.O. #32209 - Clifford Fogus Be Plats Preliminary plat of Lots 1 through 21, Block A, and Lot 1, Block B, Hunter's Ridge Addition. The 16.205 acre tract was located at the northwest corner of Lillian Miller Parkway and Teasley Lane. (The Planning and zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0.) C. Tax Refunds 1. Jackie R. Norris, M.D. - $1,206.78 Council Member Cott returned to the meeting. competitive bids and providing for the award of public works or improvements. (6.A.1. - Bid #1513) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-121 Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting contracts for AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry '!aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the execution of a change order to a contract between the City of Denton and Clifford Fogus; and providing for an increase in the contras% pri¢~. (6.A.2. - Chan~e O~de~ P.O. 923309) 9¸6 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 20 The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-122 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CHANGE ORDER TO A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND CLIFFORD FOGUS; PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CONTRACT PRICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance establishing fees to be paid in relation to an application for or renewal of a loading zone. (The Citizens Traffic Safety Support Commission recommended approval.) Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that Council had approved the loading zone ordinance at its June 1, 1993 meeting. There were blanks in the ordinance for the cost of the zones. At its June 15 meeting, Council had approved fees, however, the ordinance passed on a 3-2 vote. There was a discussion regarding four votes to approve an ordinance and the City Attorney's office indicated that four affirmative votes would be needed. The June 15 meeting was not binding. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 93-123 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING FEES TO BE PAID IN RELATION TO AN APPLICATION FOR OR RENEWAL OF A LOADING ZONE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Chew seconded to adopt the ordinance. Council Member Cott asked if this ordinance had to be approve at all. Could the Council go back to general loading zones with no parking. Mayor Castleberry indicated that the motion and second was to adopt the ordinance as written. Council Member Miller stated that if the Council voted against the ordinance there would be no charge for the loading zones. The ordinance was only dealing with the fees for the loading zone. 97 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 21 There was an ordinance in place for the loading zones. If Council did not approve this ordinance, there would be loading zones but no fees. On roll vote, Brock "nay", Cott "nay", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried with a 5-2 vote. 8. Resolutions A. The Council considered approving a resolution establishing and creating a special citizens advisory committee to provide recommendations regarding a possible additional sales tax to reduce the property tax. Catherine Tuck, Administrative Assistant, stated that Council had considered this item at its planning session. Council desired to create a citizens committee to provide for the study of a possible sales tax amendment. There were several blanks in resolution for the number of individuals on the committee and the number each Council Member would nominate. There was also a blank when the committee would bring its report back to the Council which was important for when the Council might want to hold the election. Dates for the election would the third Saturday in January, the first Saturday in May, the second Saturday in August, the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked Tuck to review the time frame to implement the tax. Tuck replied that the date was always October 1st. Any election date would be appropriate. She also mentioned that the resolution indicated that the committee would engage an expert in the financial field to review the economic impact on various groups in the community. The following resolution was considered: NO. R93-042 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AND CREATING A SPECIAL CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING A POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL SALES TAX TO REDUCE THE PROPERTY TAX; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 98 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 22 Brock motioned, Smith to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Castleberry asked for a number of committee members. Would the Council want to appoint two members per Council Member plus the entire Council appoint a chair. Consensus of the Council was to have 15 members, two from each council member and the Council would appoint a chair. Mayor Castleberry asked for a possible election date. Mayor Pro Tem Smith felt that the November date would be too soon and suggested either January or May. City Manager Harrell stated that a May election, if this election could be separate from the Council election, would save election costs which otherwise would have to be assumed. The January date would put a distance between the Council election and this election. Typically results in a January were not good and was not a good month to hold a sales tax election. Mayor Castleberry stated that if the election were in May, the effective date of the sales tax would be October 1, 1994. City Manager Harrell replied correct that any election date would have an effective date of October 1, 1994. Council Member Cott recommended a January election. Council Member Perry felt January would not be a good month. Council Member Miller felt that May might be a good month. It would be too great a rush to do the election in November and January was not good time either. Council Member Brock felt that this issue might become a major issue of a election campaign. There were many other issues to look at during an election campaign. She was concerned that it might skew the election. Council Member Chew agreed with Council Member Brock. City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 23 Chew motioned, Cott seconded for a January election. On roll vote, Brock "nay", Cott, "aye", Miller "nay", smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried with a 5- 2 vote. Mayor Castleberry stated that time was needed for the committee to report to Council and suggested October 15, 1993. Cott motioned, Chew seconded that the Committee report to Council on October 15, 1993, that the Committee be composed of 15 individuals two each presented by Council and the chair appointed by the entire Council and that the election be held January 16, 1994. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked when the Council would present names for approval. Mayor Castleberry suggested that the Committee be appointed August 15, 1993. City Manager Harrell suggested that the members be nominated the first meeting in August. 9. The Council received nominations for the City's Boards and Commissions. The Council nominated individuals to the City's Boards and Commission as indicated in Attachment A. 10. The Council received an update on the Vision for Denton-21st Century Project. (Council Members Brock and Miller) Council Member Brock presented minutes of the June 23rd meeting of the project cabinet which indicated some of their considerations of projects and schedules. On July 19-20 Joe Landford would be speaking to the project cabinet regarding the visioning project. Several committees were already in progress. One was to locate a place for a vision room, the publicity committee had started work and there was a committee to work up a data bank for volunteers as well as a community outreach subcommittee which was working on ideas to get the community involved. They were also working on a speaker's bureau and groups to address. There would be an information packet for speakers so that all speakers would have the same information plus a folder for volunteer information. 100 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 24 Council Member Miller stated that the kick-off date had been tentatively set for Sunday, October 24, 1993 at 1:30 p.m. This would involve 3-3 1/2 hours in order to discuss the process and the future of Denton. 11. Staff Direction Council provided staff direction on the following item: A. Major Budget Issues Report Ken Gold presented information to Council regarding budget information. This information addressed the inequity in civil service raises as compared to other city employees as well as the difference in TMRS pensions. Staffing at the fire stations was a continuing problem. City Manager Harrell stated that he had three items for Council: (1) Under separate cover, information had been given to Council which addressed Council's questions from the previous meeting. (2) Recommendation from the Human Services Committee. The Committee had given Council recommendations with priorities and asked if Council were going to reduce the amount funded, that they be given a chance to reprioritize the agencies for allocation. Last year, after the major budget issues had been presented, the new amount of money was sent back to Human Services Committee and they reallocated the money. If Council felt comfortable with the amount proposed in the budget, that could be taken to the Committee. If the Council were not comfortable, a determination could be made later in the process. Staff had recommended an allocation which would approximate an increase that other departments were receiving. Council Member Chew suggested waiting until they were further into the budget before making these types of decisions. Mayor Castleberry stated that he was uncomfortable proceeding at this time. Council Member Cott asked if there was something that needed to be done now. City Manager Harrell stated that he was trying to follow the Council's past practices. At some point, prior to the time the Council formally adopted budget, the Committee had requested an opportunity to reprioritize the allocations to the various agencies 10 1 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 25 rather than the Council doing that. There was time needed to do that process. Consensus of the Council was to delay consideration until further in the budget process. (3) Recommendation regarding ambulance service 2 Harrell suggested increasing the fee now rather than wait until end of the budget process. He asked if there was Council support to prepare an ordinance to put the fee increase in effect. Council Member Chew felt that it would be difficult to increase fees to Denton citizens until after an increase had been made on the fee to smaller cities. The City was subsidizing too much for the smaller cities. city Manager Harrell stated that if the fee were raised, it would be raised for everyone. Denton citizens and small cities alike. Council Member Chew felt that there was a lot of subsidizing and there was a need to make it more equitable between the citizens and the contract cities. Mayor Castleberry asked Council Member Chew if he were suggesting that the outside fees be greater than in the City. Council Member Chew replied correct. city Manager Harrell stated that it was recognized that that was the case and that was the reason for starting dialogues with all of the smaller cities and as well as lobbying the County to continue their subsidy to the City. Mayor Castleberry asked for the actual cost for a run. City Manager Harrell stated that the current charge was $120. The actual cost was over $300 per run which was a conservative estimate for the cost of a run. Council Member Perry asked if runs out of the city were charged less than $120. City Manager Harrell stated that all runs were $120. The amount received in fees plus the County subsidy did not cover the cost for running the ambulance service. The gap between the amount collected and the County subsidy was subsidized either by the smaller cities or the general city tax payer to balance the budget. 102 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 26 Mayor Castleberry suggested that staff bring calculations and the Council could then decide on a possible increase before the final budget process. Council Member Chew asked for figures to make the fees equitable for all. City Manager Harrell stated that Deputy City Manager Svehla and Fire Chief Cook were going to meet with the small cities to discuss the problem and possibly determine a way to make the process more equitable. It might take a couple of year program to get to an equitable ground as the other cities would be in the budget process also. 12. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell, City Manger, presented the following items: A. The staff had prepared a different agenda format per Council's direction. A public requests section had been added for input from citizens plus a "Staff Direction" item which would involve major items needing council direction. 13. There was no Executive Session held during the Work Session. 14. New Business The following items of New Business were suggested by Council Members for future agendas: A. Council Member Chew motioned, Cott seconded for reconsideration of the Bartonville-Argyle ETJ issue. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. Council Member Miller suggested reviewing the city smoking ordinance. 15. There was no Executive Session held during the Regular Session. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:35 p.m. 103 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 6, 1993 Page 27 i~yi!icrD~ee!~i~STexas ACC0012F Bob'Castleberry, Mayor/ City of Denton, Texas/ AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER Terry Garland George Gilkeson Rick Woolfolk BOARD/COMMISSION NOMINATIONS 1993-94 NOMINATION Terry Garland George Gilkeson William (Mike) Stephens ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER 7 Bettye Johnson 1 Nonie Kull 3 Steve Meyerdirk 4 VACANT NOMINATION Nonie Kull Steve Meyerdirk BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SEAT CURRENT MEMBER 6 VACANT 7 Bill Colville 1 E. Ray Griffin 3 Rebecca Blair 4 Rebecca King NOMINATION Rachel Mays Bill Colville L. A. Wilkerson Rebecca Blair Rebecca King BUILDING CODE BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER 1 Ed Owens 2 Cliff Reding NOMINATION Ed Owens Nicholas Eassa TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Chew Smith Brock TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1991-94 COUNCIL Mayor Chew Perry Cott TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Brock Mayor Chew Perry Cott TERM 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Chew Smith 10,5 ~"" CABLE TV ADVISORY BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION 5 Joe Holland Ed Bell 2 Richard Rodean Richard Rodean TERM 1993-96 1993-96 COUNCIL Miller Smith CITIZENS TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPORT COMMISSION SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION Carolyn Bacon Doug Chadwick Betty Duncan Alice Gore Carolyn Bacon Kathleen Singleton Betty Duncan Alice Gore COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE SEAT 1 2 4 6 CURRENT MEMBER Peggy Norton Sarah Parker Dennis Stephens Jack Weir NOMINATION Peggy Norton Lisa Polack James McDade Jack Weir TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Perry Cott Miller Mayor COUNCIL Chew smith cott Brock DATA PROCESSING ADVISORY BOARD SEAT 7 1 CURRENT MEMBER Don Edwards Jim Kuy~endall NOMINATION Don Edwards Eugene (Gene) Luster TERM 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Mayor Chew 106 DOWNTOWN ADVISORY BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION 5 Dean Cochran Robert (Kent) Baxter 6 Don Davis Don Davis 7 Kathleen Gigl Teri Rheault 1 George Highfill Pat Will 2 Don Hill Don Hill la Bill Thomas Bill Thomas TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993~95 1993-95 COUNCIL Miller Brock Mayor Chew Smith Chew ELECTRICAL CODE BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER Stuart Cawthon Terry Schertz Trenton L. Williams Fred G. Reed NOMINATION Stuart Cawthon Terry Schertz Trenton L. Williams Fred G. Reed TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Smith Miller Brock Mayor HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SEAT CURRENT MEMBER Judith Abbott W. A. Barker Liz Bays Elinor Caldwelt Rita Holcomb George Spuller NOMINATION Judith Abbott Bullitt Lowry Suzanne Byron Mark Merki Rita Holcomb Alan Smart TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Smith Cott Miller Brock Chew Perry 107 ~HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE SEAT 4 5 1 3 5a 6 7 CURRENT MEMBER A1 Barstis Catherine Bell Dorothy Damico Linda Holloway Carol Riddlesperger Gary Truitt VACANT NOMINATION Wesley H. Stewart Catherine Bell Ed Smith Linda Holloway Carol Riddlesperger Victor DeSantis Mary Morimoto TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993--95 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Cott Miller Chew Perry Miller Brock Mayor KEEP DENTON BEAUTIFUL BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER 3 4 5 1 2a John Cooper Dick Engle John Enlow Sherrie Etheredge Jeane Morrison Martha Len Nelson NOMINATION Judy smith Dick Engle John Enlow Jean Ross Don Hayes Martha Len Nelson TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Smith Perry Cott Miller Chew Smith LIBRARY BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER Dorothy Adkins Jean Greenlaw Dorothy Minter Mary Jo Pickens NOMINATION Linnie McAdams Jean Greenlaw Dorothy Minter Alex Finlay TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Miller Brock Chew smith 108 PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER Dalton Gregory Burkley Harkless Neta Stallings NOMINATION Doug Chadwick Burkley Harkless Neta Stallings TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Miller Brock Chew PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEAT CURRENT MEMBER Richard Cooper Ivan Glasscock Mary Evelyn Huey Melvin Willis PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL CODE BOARD SEAT CURRENT MEMBER George Becker Bill Burley Ted Lewellen Bob Sullivan NOMINATION Mary Evelyn Huey NOMINATION Ted Lewellen Dave Reynolds TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 COUNCIL Cott Mayor Chew Smith COUNCIL Perry Cott Mayor Smith PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD SEAT 7 CURRENT MEMBER John Thompson NOMINATION John Thompson TERM 1993-97 COUNCIL Mayor ~--.SIGN BOARD OF APPEALS SEAT CURRENT MEMBER 2 Gene Gumfory 4 Frank Massey 5 Tony Soto 6 Jim Tucker CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION SEAT CURRENT MEMBER Frank Davila DENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY SEAT 7 7a 7b CURRENT MEMBER George Hubbard Warren Whitson William Wilson TMPA BOARD OF DIRECTORS SEAT CURRENT MEMBER Ray Stephens ACC00128 NOMINATION Gene Gumfory Cliff Reding Tony Soto Dena Fairfield NOMINATION Frank Davila NOMINATION George Hubbard Warren Whitson NOMINATION TERM 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 1993-95 TERM 1993-96 TERM 1993'95 1993-95 1993-95 TERM 1993-95 109 COUNCIL Smith Cott Miller Brock Harrell Mayor Mayor Mayor Council