Loading...
Minutes April 5, 1994123 CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 5, 1994 The city Council convened into the Work Session of the City of Denton city Council on T~esday, April 5, 1994 at 5:15 p.m. in the civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith; council Members Brock, Cott, Perry, and Miller. ABSENT: Council Member Chew 1. The Council convened into the Executive Session to discuss the following: A. Legal Matters -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE Sec. 551.071 Considered action in the matter of the appeal of the decision of the TNRC in the application of Bolivar Water Supply Corporation for an amendment to CCN No. 112578; Docket Nos. 9824-C and 9447-C of the Public Utilities Commission. 2. Considered action in Gaffney and Pitts claims. 3. Considered action in Noel Wood claim. B. Real Estate -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE Sec. 551.072 1. Discussion regarding property acquisition on Foster Road and Mayhill Road. Ce Personnel/Board Appointments -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE sec. 551.074 Council Member Chew joined the meeting during the Executive Session discussion. 2. The council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding a City of Denton flag. - Joseph Portugal, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that the logo would be used on all city letterhead, vehicles, signs, anything.in public view. The existing supply of letterhead would be exhausted and then the new logo would be incorporated into the city's business cards, letterhead, and promotional materials. Council Member Cott asked if private citizens would be able to buy the flag. Mayor Castleberry felt that the City would need to copyright the logO· 124 City of Denton city COuncil Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 2 Council Member Brock suggested using a darker blue and changing the colors with the blue and red. Mayor CastleberrY stated that the problem in the past was that there was no consistency throughout the City. This would standardize it throughout the City. Mayor Pro Tem Smith agreed with the suggestion of using a darker color blue. Council Member Cott felt that the red on the outside gave the ability to see the flag a long distance. Mayor Castleberry stated that there was a need to standardize the red color also. Council Member Brock suggested changing the colors for comparison and also expressed a concern about the expense of having colored stationary. Mayor Castleberry stated that there would be a flat charge for two colors and the more copies that were made, the more the cost would go down as long as the colors were standardized. Mayor Pro Tem Smith suggested adopting a policy regarding the use of the city flag. City Attorney Drayovitch stated that the City should apply for a copyright for the logo alsoo Council considered the next item while staff revised the sample flag as suggested. 3. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding the draft Board of Adjustment ordinance. Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development, stated that he would like to review the sections of the ordinance and note. any changes for the Council. Section 34-41 only had a minor rewording from the original ordinance regarding the organization of the Board. There would be five members with two alternates appointed and four votes were required to approve a variance. Section 35-42, dealing with the jurisdiction of the Board, listed the four actions which the Board could take. It ~oul~ hear an appeal of any officer of th~ City; h~ar and ~on~ider nonconforming uses; evaluate and cause termination of a nonconforming use; and could consider the replacement, renovation, remodeling or repair of a nonconforming use. A nonconforming use 125 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 3 was a use of land which did not conform to the zoning district it was in. The Board could hear variances of the standards of the Zoning Ordinance such as setbacksand heights but not variances for the use of the property. The Board could also grant special exceptions which was a specifically determined situation. Council Member Cott asked why a super majority was needed. Robbins replied that. it was a requirement of the state law. Council Member Brock stated that a special exception was a change from one conforming use to another conforming use. Robbins replied that that was one kind of special exception. The Ordinance recognized only one type of special exception. Sections 35-43, 35-44 and 35-45 relating to rules and procedures, notice of public hearings and appeals did not have any changes. Section 35- 46 regarding limitations on an appeal was a new section. The current ordinance had no limit on appeals. Section 35-47 was a new section and dealt with placing the burden of proof for an appeal on the applicant. Council Member Cott asked if limiting an appeal was a process which had happened frequently in Denton and why was the ordinance making it more difficult to come to the City for relief. Robbins replied that this was standard procedure so that an individual did not keep returning for the same appeal. Council Member Brock stated that a great deal of staff work was involved in an appeal and that section would eliminate the tendency for repeated returns to the Council for an item already considered. Council Member Cott felt that that section needed to be more user friendly. Robbins stated that Section 35-48 dealt with the amortization of uses and structures. The section added language regarding the termination of nonconforming uses byadding the variables which the Board must take into consideration before amortizing' away a nonconforming use. Section 35-51 dealt with variances considered by the Board. Mayor Pro Tem Smith asked if the Zoning ordinance Task Force recommended approval of the proposal. Robbins replied that this was the first recommendation to come from that Task Force. 126 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 4 Consensus of Council was to bring the item before Council. for consideration at a future meeting. The Council returned to Item #2. 2. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding a City of Denton flag. Joseph Portugal, Assistant to the City Manager, presented t. wo versions of the flag with a blue outline versus a red outline. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with the blue outline and draft the necessary ordinances to adopt such. 4. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding the allocation of hotel occupancy tax funds to match Certified Local Governments Program FY 1994 grant award. (The Historic Landmark Commission recommended approval.) Frank Robbins,. Executive Director for Planning and Development, stated that the Historic Landmark Commission had found a way to move forward with historic preservation in Denton by matching with hotel/motel occupancy tax, the fifty percent grant which the State had already authorized for the City. The State had suggested that a survey be done of the historic structures in the ~City. There - would be no effect on the city property taxpayers for the project. The Historic Landmark Commission recommended that the survey be done and use the funds as indicated. Mayor Castleberry asked if the work would be done by a professional outside source. Robbins replied correct. Council Member Perry asked how each property would be surveyed. Robbins replied that the surveyors would notice those structures. Council Member Perry asked how an individual would have a building looked at by the group. Judith Abbott, Chair-Historic Landmark Commission, stated that the surveyor would drive up and down every street and using set criteria would examine every structure and compare it with the criteria. A report would be prepared on those structures which met the standards. 127 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 5 City Manager Harrell stated that a notice could be prepared so that residents would know what was happening. Mayor Castleberry stated that if a structure was in the survey, it would not obligate the property owner to designate it as a historic landmark. Robbins replied correct. Council M~mber Chew stated that he had a concern regarding the use of the hotel/motel funds. He asked if there would be any more requests for the use of those funds before Council looked at the contracts for the various organizations. City Manager Harrell stated that this was the first request to use the reserve funds and it was not likely that there would be many requests. Council Member Cott stated that every day that passed brought closer the possibility of losing some of these historic buildings. There was a need to bring the project together. Council Member Chew stated that he was not against the project. He felt that the request should have waited until the Council had looked at the contracts. City Manager Harrell stated that this program had acquired a 50% state grant so that it would only cost $11,000. If the City deferred the money, it might lose the funding. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with the project. 5. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding Denton County Judge Jeff MoSeley's request for a response regarding board membership on the Upper Trinity Regional Water District. Due to a time constraint, this item was considered during the Regular Session under Miscellaneous Matters from the City Manager. The Council convened into the Regular Meeting on Tuesday, April 5, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Smith; Council Members Brock, Chew, Cott, Perry, and Miller. ABSENT: None 128 city of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 6 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiancei' 2. The Council considered approval of a resolution appreciation for Billy Jack Johnson. The following resolution was considered: NO. RA94-007 RESOLUTION IN APPRECIATION OF BILLY JACK JOHNSON of Mayor Castleberry presented the following proclamations: Believe It or Not I Can Week Texas Archeology Week Keep America Beautiful National Education Credit Week 3. The Council received a citizen report from Dessie Goodson regarding SPAN. Ms. Goodson stated that SPAN's door to door service had not changed and that they were late picking up callers. The riders depended on this service provided by SPAN. SPAN expected the riders to be ready for pickup but did not provide the same service when called by riders. Riders were concerned with the lack of interest regarding the operation and conditions of SPAN. SPAN needed better personnel in all departments and vehicles needed to be up to standards. The citizens of Denton deserved council members, a manager and mayor who would listen and take an interest in issues regarding the community. The community would be better served if all of them would resign and individuals appointed who would better serve the community. Other riders felt the same way but would not speak as they felt it would not do any good. She would rather walk than ride the SPAN system. Perry motioned, Smith seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 129 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 7 4. Public Hearings ~ A. The council held a public hearing and considered two variances to Chapter 34-114 of the Code of Ordinances (Subdivision and Land Development Regulations) regarding alleys in the proposed Woodrow Addition. The 2.0015 acre site was located on the west side of Woodrow Lane, directly south of Morse Street. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of both variances on March 23, 1994, 5-2). Frank Robbins, Executive Director for Planning and Development, stated that this variancewas associated with a plat on the Consent Agenda. If the variances were not approved, the plat should be pulled from consideration. The two variances dealt with alleys connecting to arterial streets. The unique situation of this property was that there were no other streets other than arterial streets adjoining the property. The only way out from an alley would be onto an arterial street. -.T~e second variance dealt with the separation of a street from an intersection. The standard was 400' and in this case, the distance would be 140' and approximately 310' to the intersection. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the site for problems with traffic and felt that all three variance criteria had been met. The Mayor opened the public hearing.. No one spoke in favor. No one spoke in opposition. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Council Member Chew asked for the proximity of the proposal to Baldwin Street. Robbins indicated on an overhead the location of the proposal to Baldwin Street. Council Member Chew felt it was too close to Baldwin Street. Robbins replied that there was a set of standards for intersection distances. The intersection in question was only on Morse Street and there were no other driveways or.intersections too close. Council Member Perry asked if the alley would be wide enough for emergency equipment. Robbins replied correct. 130 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 8 Council Member Brock stated that if there was enough conflict with the trash pickup and the school traffic, it might be necessary to schedule trash pickup at a different time for an added safety element. Robbins replied that that could be done. Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering, stated that the traffic flow could be right in-right out with no left turn going across the street. There were less trips per day with the residential setting as opposed to a commercial setting. Council Member Brock felt that this would be a good use .of the property. Brock motioned to approve, Chew seconded although he did not like the alley but felt that the proposal was good for development. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 5. Consent Agenda Brock motioned, Smith seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. A. Bids and Purchase Orders: 1. RFSP #1612 - Computer Equipment B. Plats and Replats Preliminary plat of Lots i through 9, Block A, Woodrow Addition. The 2.0015 acre site was located on the west side of Woodrow Lane, directly south of Morse Street. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval at its meeting of March 23, 1994, 7-0.) C. Tax Refunds 1. Numed, Inc. for $901.26. 2. Lomas Mortgage Co. for Frank R. Kemerer for $1,362.33. 131 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 9 3. Verl C. Lybbert et al for $577.98. e Lawyers American Title for Karen C. Pepper for $604.12. 6. Ordinances A. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance accepting a competitive sealed proposal and awarding a contract for the purchase of materials, equipment, supplies or services (5.A.1. - RFSP #1612) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 94-058 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Smith motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending portions of Chapter 18, Article II, Division 2 relating to truck routes; providing for the weight of vehicles used exclusively to transport ready-mix concrete; providing for certain routes for vehicles possessing a state-issued overweight permit; adding a portion of Prairie street to the truck route; providing for a repeal of any ordinance in conflict therewith; providing for a severability provision; and providing for a penalty in the maximum amount.of $200.00 for violations of the provisions hereof. (The Traffic Safety Commission recommended approval.) Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering, stated that staff had based changes of requirements for concrete trucks on the Garland and Mesquite ordinance. Those requirements were too low and were inaccurate. There had been much input from the ready-mix companies. The proposal would adjust the truck route ordinance based on the design of the trucks and adjusted the front axle down to 1600 pounds. It also raised the amount which would be on the rear two axles where most of the load was carried. There were two types of loads-one of which was an overload permit for state highways. There was a State permitting office in Austin which created the permits for that type of load and the intent was to 132 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 10 have that type of load remain on the State highways as much as possible. The adjustment to the 20,000 pound axle load would not hinder concrete trucks from delivering loads. The second kind of load was a standard load in which a truck could go on state highways or city streets. The proposed ordinance also took out the exemption for city vehicles and they would be asked to abide by the truck route ordinance. The exception to that would be for the solid waste trucks which needed to go throughout the neighborhoods. Staff had received clarification on the wording for an overweight vehicle. It was felt that this proposal would be a positive adjustment and made the ordinance user friendly. Council Member Cott asked how the industry felt about the ordinance. Clark replied that they seemed positive about the revisions and had worked with staff on those revisions. Council Member Brock asked if the proposal dealt exclusively with ready-mix concrete trucks. Clark replied correct, as the other heavy loads were already addressed. Council Member Brock stated that she had seen trucks on Bonnie Brae hauling heavy loads of dirt in dump trucks. Did they have an agreement with the City to use the route. Clark stated that the initial routing of the trucks had been done without an agreement. This was a new business in the area which was hauling dirt and they agreed to assist with the repair of the road. City Manager Harrell stated that approximately nine months ago staff had presented a comprehensive rewrite of the truck route ordinance. The.Police Department had purchased equipment to start testing trucks which were off the truck route and might be in violation of the ordinance. As that process proceeded, it was found that ready-mix trucks could not clualify under the load limits which had been established. That caused the rewrite of that portion of the ordinance. The Traffic Safety Commission worked on a refinement to the truck route ordinance. The previous truck route ordinance dealt with other types of loads and the location of those routes. Council Member Cott asked on what basis did the cement trucks pay taxes to the City. 133 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 11 city Manager Harrell stated that there was no tax on trucks other than regular property taxes or sales tax. The City did not receive any of the revenue the trucks had to pay to the State for the permits. Danny Patton, Lake Cities Concrete, stated that he was appreciative of the Traffic Safety Commission in helping with the solution to the problem with the original ordinance. He stated that he was in favor of the ordinance. Tony Strickland, Redi-Mix Concrete, stated that he appreciated the consideration of the truck routes. His trudks used wider tires to help displace the weight of~-the trucks and reduce the damage to the streets. Kathy Devine, Traffic Safety Commission, stated that the City staff had worked well with the citizens on this proposal. The ordinance would allow the ready-mix companies to operate within the City of Denton. City Manager Harrell stated that the City Attorney had recommended that if the Council was in favor of the ordinance to adopt the ordinance as presented in the backup and then would present the clarifying amendment at a later meeting. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 94-059 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING PORTIONS OF CHAPTER 18, ARTICLE II, DIVISION 2 RELATING TO TRUCK ROUTES; PROVIDING FOR THE WEIGHT OF VEHICLES USED EXCLUSIVELY TO TRANSPORT READY-MIX CONCRETE; PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN ROUTES FOR VEHICLES POSSESSING A STATE-ISSUED OVERWEIGHT PERMIT; .ADDING A PORTION OF PRAIRIE STREET TO THE TRUCK ROUTE; PROVIDING FOR A REPEAL OFANY ORDINANCE IN CONFLICT THEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY PROVISION; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUMAMOUNT OF $200.00 FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE PROVISIONS HEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Perry motioned, Smith seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement between the city of Denton and Melvin Hartline to purchase property. 134 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 12 This item was pulled from consideration. D. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance naming the Leathers Playground at South Lakes Parks, "Eureka!" City Manager Harrell stated that Council had discussed this item at the last work session and an ordinance had been drafted per Council direction. Brock motioned, Perry seconded to adopt the ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Smith stated that since the time when Council had discussed this item and gave direction regarding the ordinance, she had talked with many students, parents and interested citizens regarding the naming of the playground and she was convinced that Council's directive to staff to prepare an ordinance was based on, in the best case, incomplete information and, in the worst case, erroneous information. She indicated that she would not vote for the ordinance. Council Member Cott suggested pulling the item for more information. Council Member Miller stated that Council had had considerable discussion at the last meeting regarding the naming of the playground. With the other suggested name for the playground there were some problems remembering the exact name suggested. Eureka! would not be confused with any other name. Mayor Pro Tem Smith stated that many of people who were very interested and very concerned were ready for the issue to be settled. The project was more important than what the name would be. On roll vote of the motion to name the playground Eureka~, Brock "aye", Cott "nay", Miller "aye", Smith "nay", Chew "nay", Perry "nay", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion failed with a 3-4 vote. City Attorney D~&yovitch ~tated that the Council could propose another name if it so desired and could amend the ordinance currently before the Council.. Council Member Miller Stated that at the last meeting this item had been moved ahead on the agenda in order to complete it before the Counoil went into Regular Session. That helped with the confusion regarding the presentation of the item in the Work Session and there was one individual who was late arriving at the meeting who did not get a chance to speak at the Work Session. 135 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 13 Miller motioned, Smith seconded to place the item on the next agenda and receive more input and discussion before determining a name. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 7. Resolutions A. The Council considered approval of a resolution reappointing Lloyd V. Harrell and Rick Svehla, and appointing Kathy DuBose, Acting Executive Director for Finance, to the Board of Directors for the Denton Health Facilities Development Corporation, Inc. Kathy DuBose, Acting Executive Director for Finance, stated that the resolution appointed her to the Board and reappointed the others. This was a non-profit public corporation created to promote and develop new, expanded or improved health facilities. Board members served 6 year terms. The following resolution was considered: NO. R94-013 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DENTON HEALTH FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Cott motioned, Brook seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 8. The Council considered nominations to the Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board and the Keep Denton Beautiful Board. Council Member Brock nominated Lee Caps to the Plumbing and Mechanical Code Board. Council Member Perry 'indicated that he was not ready for his nomination to the Keep Denton Beautiful Board. 9. Receive a Vision Update. Council Member Miller stated that the Cabinet had held a meeting that morning with the co-leaders of the impact areas. They heard reports from each group which were meeting regularlY. It was felt that the project was well under way. There would be an open house 136 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 14 at the Vision Room on Sunday from 2-4 p.m. Council Member Brock stated that the Vision Room would be open daily in the near future. Volunteers would keep the room open from 10-2 p.m. for visitors. council Member Miller asked if there were any questions, concerns or comments from other Council Members regarding the project. 10. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that a tentative date of May 4 had been selected for the quarterly meeting with the DISD. The DISD had invited the county judge and commissioners to join the joint luncheon. The Council considered Work Session Item #5. 5. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding Denton County Judge Jeff Moseley's request for a response regarding board membership on the Upper Trinity Regional Water District. Bob Nelson, Executive Director for Utilities, stated that there had been an ongoing difference of opinion regarding an appointee to the. at-large County position on the Upper Trinity Regional Water District Board. The original legislation indicated that that appointee would be appointed from a list that the Board of Directors prepared of individuals within the County. That list would be submitted to the County for a selection. Denton County had a different opinion on the reading..of ~e law. The County had asked for the City's input on the issue. Several other communities had expressed the opinion that the at-large position should be appointed from such a list. This at-large position served as a participating role on the Board and would be able to vote on financial matters. He understood that Carrollton and Lewisville would be responding to the Judge's letter indicatin~ that they preferred that the at-large position be selected from a list supplied .by the District. Several of the smaller communities agreed. Council Member Miller stated that it was the clear intent when the district was established that this participating member would come from a slate recommended by the Board. When the information was retyped, there was a division in ~h~ paragraphs which changed the meaning of the intent. 137 city of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 Page 15 Nelson replied that that was the intent of the original steering committee, There were two levels of memberships developed, contract membership and participating membership. The at-large position was developed so that a water supply corporation could respond with at least one member. The concern then developed of who should appoint that member. It was decided that a list would be developed by the Board and submitted to the County Commissioners for selection. In the process of codifying, the at-large position was confused with a different position. Council Member Perry asked if the position of the member cities was in accord with what Judge Moseley was asking. Nelson stated that it was not the same. Judge Moseley was asking whether the County had to select from a list or be allowed to determine that position. Council Member Cott felt that there needed to be control over the Board and Judge Moseley had presented an opportunity to help exercise that control. He hoped that the City would not take the same position with the City's landfill. He did not want a shared use of the landfill. City Manager Harrell stated that Lewisville and Carrollton had encouraged the County.. that if the County had a legal dispute regarding the way the statute was written that they seek an Attorney General's opinion as opposed to any legal action. Council-Member Brock stated that she agreed with the position Bob Nelson had described that the individuals making direct appointments to the Board were the ones making an investment to the project. They were the entities who were committing to pay for the project. The County was barred by law from creating water supplies. It seemed appropriate that those paying should have a stronger voice over those not paying. She supported the position originally intended that the County make an appointment from a list given by the Board. Council Member Chew indicated that he agreed with Council Member Brock on the procedure. Council Member Miller agreed with the others and also with the suggestion of seeking an Attorney General's opinion. Miller motioned, Chew seconded that the City's position on the issue be that the County Commissions must choose an at-large representative from a list given to them by the Board of Directors and that the County seek an Attorney General's opinion regarding 138 City of Denton City Council Minutes April 5, 1994 ' Page 16 the issue rather than pursuing legal action. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "nay", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", a~d Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried with a vote. il. Official Action on Executive Session Items: The following action was taken on items discussed during the Work Session Executive Session: Perry motioned, Smith seconded to authorize the Mayor to respond to the Bolivar Water Supply Corporation. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott "aye", Miller "aye"v Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 12. New Business The following items of New Business were suggested by Council Members for future agendas: A. Council Member Brock suggested that ,staff prepare for a budget consideration the idea of a 511 number for non-emergency calls to be able to route those calls in appropriate directions. 13. Executive Session: There was no Executive Session held during the Regular Session. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. ciNNIFE~.WALTERS TY S~R~.TARY TY OF DENTON, TEXAS BOB~S~EB~~ CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS/ ACC001BD