Loading...
Minutes July 12, 1994371 CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 12, 1994 The Council convened into the Executive Session on Tuesday, July 12, 1994 at 5:15 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Brock; Council Members Chew, Cott, Perry, Miller and Smith. ABSENT: None 1. The Council considered the following in Executive Session: A. Legal Matters -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE Sec. 551.071 1. Considered a report from the consulting firm of Reed Stowe regarding their audit of GTE's franchise fee payments. B. Real Estate -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE Sec. 551.072 Co Personnel/Board Appointments -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE Sec. 551.074 The Council convened into a Special Call Session of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, July 12, 1994 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Brock; Council Members Chew, Cott, Perry, Miller and Smith. ABSENT: None 1. The Council considered nominations and/or appointments to the City's Boards and Commissions. Mayor Castleberry indicated that nominations had been made at the last meeting and Council was now ready to vote on those nominations. Cott motioned to approve the nominations. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Council made additional nominations as noted in Attachment A. 2. The Council held a briefing on the scope of the city/Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Study and gave staff direction. Lloyd Harrell, City Manager, stated that this was a continuation of the project proposed by the Chamber of Commerce at a previou~ meeting. At that meeting, Council authorized participation in a joint economic development project. Staff had received a draft 372 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 2 contract which the Chamber p~oposed to enter into with a consulting firm. Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development, stated that Council had been presented a scope of study for the proposal. The objective of the study was to perform an overall assessment of how the City was situated with competing cities, in terms of incentives, site availability, and how the City was able to bring a deal to closure. She presented suggestions/changes to the proposed scope of study. Those suggestions/changes included (1) an analysis of the perception of Denton's quality of life as compared to competitors in terms of education, location, business climate, basic services such as health care, housing and a profile of existing manufacturers; (2) an early review session with the consultants to ensure that they read and understood the study's objectives correctly; (3) all of the assessments were to be done on a comparative basis; and (4) expanding the time frame to complete the study as currently it was suggested to begin the project in August and complete in mid- October. Mayor Pro Tem Brock stated that there was an emphasis on competitiveness but it was not clear what that involved. The North Texas Commission had presented information which showed that too much time had been spent competing within the metroplex and overall it was a loss when a company was drawn from another part of the region. The Vision consultant had indicated that there was a need to look at the issue regionally. A prospect needed to be attracted to the region and then within the region there was a need to market the city as unique. She was concerned that the study would be dealing with such issues as how long it took a development proposal to go through the Carrollton City Hall as compared to Denton. Was the study dealing with other cities in the metroplex, nation-wide or internationally. McKean replied that this item was layered and the competitiveness would be addressed on several different levels. The first level would be international and how to gain an international reputation. The second level would be nationally so that with an initial cut, Denton would still be included in the prospects. The third level would be locally which would look at any possible factors which would cause Denton to drop out of the competition. These factors would also include concrete items in terms of the City's development process and permitting process. The consultant had been asked to respond in terms of dollars for each of the tasks so aa to be able to pick and choose if necessary, the items in the project. 373 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 3 Mayor Pro Tem Brock referred to page 2 which dealt with the purposes and goals. It was indicated that the study would identify key economic trends, analyze market and retention programs, etc. She felt that that was very specific very quickly and that a starting point needed to be what companies were looking for when they started looking for an area in which to locate and what factors determined their decisions. She felt that the study also needed to look at companies which had decided to come to Denton and what particular/unique qualities did Denton have which made them decide to choose Denton. Council Member Smith stated that proposed changes were good. On page 6 of the scope of study, she suggested that the City receive 15 copies of the preliminary report as well as the Chamber. She also felt that a final report should be presented to the City as well as the Chamber. Council Member Miller felt that it was extremely important if the study were to be meaningful, that it find out what it was that businesses were looking for in communities. Much of the information in the scope of services was very important but businesses would not get to that type of information until it had looked at such issues as location, what kind of community it was, what were the educational opportunities, etc. He felt that those items needed to be identified not only in terms of strengths and weaknesses, but also in terms of what they were, relative to what was being, looked for, such as what kind of labor force Denton had. It was necessary to look at how people located. One of the last items which a large business looked at was the zoning laws, as they would spend many dollars looking at those issues before deciding on whether to explore a community further. The study should indicate what the world would look like in terms of economic development whether for domestic companies or international companies. This was what they were looking for and based on that, here was how Denton was analyzed. He felt it was important to have an early assessment with the consultant and that the time frame of 2-2 1/2 months was too short. There was no emergency which dictated that there had to be a short time frame for the study. Too strict a time frame would be to the City's disadvantage. The macro issues needed to be looked at first to find out where Denton fit into the world and then look at the micro issues. Council Member Perry indicated that page 4, #3 dealt with an assessment of Denton's business incentive programs. He felt that that segment should grow out from what was already discovered as being attractive on an international, national, and local scale. The final report should grow out of what was discovered about Denton. 374 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 4 McKean stated that the consultant would be provided the existing package of City incentive programs and they would do a matrix of area cities. This would show areas where other cities could work better with businesses easier and faster than Denton. Council Member Perry stated that Denton would have some unique characteristics. Out of those unique characteristics Denton's particular competitive advantages could emerge. He wanted to make sure those would be included in the study. He wanted it stated specifically that some of the innovative strategies and recommendations would grow out of the unique characteristics identified for Denton. Council Member Cott suggested that with the proposed changes a prioritization might be necessary as to the dollar limit on the study and probably not all of the items could be included. McKean suggested that the consultant advise which of the items were felt to be more important and to place those items in a priority listing. Mayor Castleberry asked about the contract for the study. McKean stated that the contract would be directly with the Chamber and the consultant. The City would review its contract with the Chamber and do an amendment to the contract with the Chamber to include the City's portion of the funding for the study. Council Membe~ Smith stated that she had a problem with page three of the contract which dealt with ownership of the documents. Currently the proposal stated that the documents would become the sole property of the Chamber. As the City was also contributing to the study, she felt that the City should have some ownership in the finished project. Mayor Castleberry suggested equal ownership of the documents. Council Member Smith felt that the City should have similar copies as the Chamber. McKean stated that that was the intent but would make sure that it was written into the contract. Council Member Perry stated that item number 7 dealt with disclosures made by the consultant to the Chamber and felt that any disclosures made to the Chamber should also be made to the City. The City should have equal access to the documents and information as the Chamber. He also suggested the contract be reviewed by the 375 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 5 City's Legal Department. He felt that there might be Open Records Act issues involved which needed to be clarified in advance. McKean stated that this had been discussed at meetings with the Chamber. Council Member Perry stated that he would like that written into the contract to make certain that it would comply with the Open Records Act. Council Member Cott stated that it might not be good to have this information accessible to open records as it was a competitive document. It might be best to keep the document with the Chamber so as to not be available to competitors. Mayor Pro Tem Brock felt any information which was committing public money, needed to be a part of the City's open records. She was concerned about challenges with the fact that Denton had contributed money for the study. Council Member Cott stated that if the City could be a venture capitalist, which the City might be able to be, it would have the ability to keep this as a competitive record. Mayor Castleberry asked the city Attorney to review the issue and return later with a decision. Mayor Pro Tem Brock stated that she would like the City contract with the Chamber to be a part of the document. The City was excluded in various areas of the documents. What kind of contract would the City need with the Chamber to safeguard the public interest. If the City were not included in the contract, then what was the legal relationship between the City and the Chamber. Council Member Chew suggested reviewing the possibility of the three entities entering into a joint contract. He had concerns with everything going to the Chamber and the President of the Chamber only. City Manager Harrell stated that all of the comments made by the Council regarding the scope of service and modifications desired to be included in the contract, would be presented to the Chamber and would assume that they would be incorporated into the contract unless the Chamber had a difficulty with those changes. The Chamber was encouraging a fast time for solicitation of consultants. In order to meet the time schedule desired by the Chamber, the suggestions would have to be incorporated into the contract and be sent out without Council review. In the meantime, 376 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 6 the City Attorney's office would be working on a contract between the City and the Chamber which would obligate the City to 50% of the contract price. That was likely to take several weeks to return for Council consideration. If the document was modified to make a three way contract as opposed to the separate contract with the Chamber, the process would be slowed down. Council Member Miller did not see a need for a three way contract but felt that there was a need to have a contract with the Chamber and the City before it went to the consultant. The two contracts would relate to each other. Council Member Chew asked if a three way contract was quicker than another type of contract. Debra Drayovitch, City Attorney, stated that if the City became party to this contract, which was drafted between the Chamber and the consultant, the City would authorize the expenditure of funds and a separate contract with the Chamber would not be needed. It would take time to look at the issue of confidentiality. There were some provisions which allowed the City to keep some of this information confidential but research must be done as to the types of information which could be confidential. Even if it were not in the contract and the City took possession of the documents, the same issue could arise. Council-Member Perry stated that as the Council was meeting every week, there was a need to take time to make a good consensus with the Chamber to resolve all of the issues. He did not want to hurry through the study. McKean stated that an additional consideration was that if the City had a contract with the Chamber, would the City have to go through the normal bid process which would change the schedule. Council Member Miller stated that if the City had a contract with the Chamber, and the Chamber had a contract with the consultant, the bid process through the City would not be necessary. He felt that a contract with the Chamber was first needed in order to make sure all areas were addressed. Mayor Pro Tem Brock felt that if the Council had the contract between the City and Chamber, it would safeguard the City's interest and the public's interest. The Chamber could then make the direct contract with the consultant. City Manager Harrell stated that the item would be placed on the Council's August 2 meeting. -- 377 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 7 Council considered Item #9. 9. The Council considered a motion to reconsider at the July 19, 1994 Council meeting, an ordinance rezoning a 17.9335 acre tract located on the east side of Ruddell Street south of the extension of East Hickory Street from single-family dwelling (SF-7) zoning district to Light Industrial-conditioned [LI(c)] zoning district. Z-94-013 Cott motioned, Miller seconded to reconsider the item. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "nay", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried with a 6-1 vote. City Manager Harrell stated that the item would be on July 19th agenda for action. Council returned to the regular order. 3. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding median openings and funding for Highway 380 from Elm Street to Loop 288. Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, presented an overview of the proposed plans. The agreement with TxDOT would ask the City for its 10% share of what the right-of-way costs would be for US380 from Loop 288 to Elm Street. TxDOT would acquire the property and do all of the appraisals, contact the owners and perform other items associated with the purchase of the property. The process would take approximately 30 months. There would be areas where the City would have to acquire whole businesses and other areas where the City would be paying damages to businesses as portions of those businesses would be taken. When all of the right-of-way was acquired, a six lane divided thoroughfare would be built. As a median divided facility, there would have,to be some discussions regarding access. In this section of road there was only one short median with the rest of the facility not median divided. The existing development plan and direction from prior Councils were used to help make the intersection flow as much as possible as well as the entire facility. Mayor Pro Tem Brock asked for an overall time frame for the project. Svehla replied that assuming all of the right-of-way property was bought in 30 months, the resident office would then begin the design. The design work would go to the District and then to Austin. That process would take approximately one year. Planning 378 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 8 for the development would take a year and then the contract would be let. It would probably be five years before actual construction. Mayor Pro Tem Brock felt that much communication would be needed with the area businesses. Svehla stated that TxDOT rules indicated that the road would always be operated. A detour might have to be constructed but the road would be open. Council Member Miller asked when the communicating with business owners and homeowners along University would begin. Svehla stated that there had been some meetings already. As the project moved forward, there would be more meetings and more information given to the property owners. Council Member Miller stated that as major changes took place along the route, there would be a need for meetings for good communication regarding the project. Council Member Smith asked about the overpass on Highway 380. Svehla replied that it would be widened as well which would affect some of the businesses which were near the current overpass. The City would have to buy right-of-way and pay some damages in that area. Cott motioned, Perry seconded to move ahead with the project. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously, 4. The Council received a report, held a discussion, and gave staff direction concerning the bidding of the City's Flexible Benefits Program (IRS 125 Plan) and marketing of individual insurance products to City employees. Tom Klin~k, Direc%or of Human Resources, stated that the flexible benefits program allowed employees to set aside before tax money for reimbursement later for eligible expenses. Neither the employer nor the employee paid social security taxes on that money. There was no cost for the program for dependent health insurance premiums, $3.50 per employee per month for Darticipation in the unreimbursed medical accounts, and the dependent child care account cost $3.50 per employee per month. Last year $800,000 was set aside by employees which saved the City $60,000 in taxes. The City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 9 379 program was due for a three year bid. Some companies which marketed individual insurance such as cancer and individual disability, might bid and offer a free administration service in exchange for access to City employees to market their individual insurance products. Free administration might still include some indirect staff time and costs. It was felt that the City's group insurance coverage was adequate and effective and that employees could make choices on individual insurance needs. Staff,s recommendation was to bid the flexible benefits program with the stipulation that no individual insurance products could be marketed to employees. The Employee Insurance Committee endorsed the recommendation. It was also recommended that a related benefit communication program be continued. The program was at no cost to the City and provided a personalized statement of benefits to each employee. The statement explained the City's cost for each benefit and provided an option for employees to increase their individual life insurance coverage. With Council,s direction the bid schedule would proceed with the specifications being finalized in July, and a selection in August in order to begin the program in January. Council Member Cott asked for the number of people or dollars which had to be guaranteed. Klinck replied that the contract did not stipulate a minimum amount of participants or dollars. smith motioned, Perry seconded to proceed with the plan. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye" unanimously. · Motion carried 5. The Council received a briefing on an improvement project for the Denton Municipal Complex. Betty McKean, Executive Director for Municipal Services and Economic Development, presented the background on the project. In the beginning of the Denton Municipal Complex project, the Woman of Justice was incorporated into the project plans. At one meeting, Chief Jez asked the architect where the Woman of Justice would be placed. The architect replied that no actual Woman of Justice would be in the project but that on the plans, there were symbolic lines for the Woman of Justice. McKean talked with an artist who presented a proposal for a Woman of Justice and the architect agreed to do the back drop design work for no charge. It was now necessary to determine a way to fund the sculpture. Acme Brick agreed to donate the brick and sh~ and Chief Sez went to visit with the Mayor regarding his help to solicit public contributors for the project. The Mayor stated that he would like to be the benefactor 380 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 10 for the sculpture and associated costs. Paula Collins was the artist who would be working on the project. She presented a rendering of what the sculpture would look like and how it would be placed in the building. The brick would be made the first week in August and would be carved immediately. The sculpture should be ready for the Open House of the building. The Council took a short recess. Following the recess, Council Members Smith and Cott and Mayor Pro Tem Brock were absent. 6. The Council received a report and held a discussion regarding the feasibility of constructing a convention center in Denton. Rich Dlugas, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that the Civic Center was built in 1967 and was primarily a building for recreational, culture and leisure experiences. The Center was currently used for offices for the Parks and Recreation Department which resulted in few places for outside meetings. Renting the facility had become increasingly difficult over the years. A consultant recommended that a comprehensive feasibility study regarding a convention center be done to include what was the market for the facility and who would use it, what type of facility was required to satisfy demand, who was providing similar facilities that could compete with the proposed facility, what was the best location for the facility, what would be the development cost of the facility, how would the facility be financed, and could such a facility be maximized if it were a joint jurisdictional facility. It was estimated that such a study would cost approximately $30-40,000. Council Members Smith and Cott and Mayor Pro Tem Brock returned to the meeting. Council Member Smith felt that the situation in Denton at the present time with a lack of hotel space and a lack of sufficient public transportation indicated a serious shortcoming to looking at a large expensive convention center. She felt that other items needed to be in place either at the same time or ahead of time in order to attract conventions to such a center. council Member Miller felt that such a study would be worthwhile to find out some of the items Council Member Smith mentioned. A study would answer some questions regarding the issue. Mayor Castleberry asked about the feasibility of the Fair being a part of the complex area. The County had done some preliminary discussion on an equestrian center and a relocation of the 381 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 11 Fairgrounds. There would have to be events going on at all times in order to be cost effective. The County might want to be a part of the study. Council Member Cott stated that an equestrian center or amphitheater would be worth a look at the possibility of such a center. Council Member Chew suggested a study in conjunction with UNT. The ideal situation would be to build a center in conjunction with a hotel. A study would help determine those issues. If correlated correctly, it would be a great plus for Denton. Council Member Perry stated that the same complex might have a performance hall located there. Council Member Brock stated that in some ways, the Civic Center had not functioned as was originally planned. When Parks moved out of the office space which was originally intended for meeting rooms, a kitchen might be designed which would enhance the facility for additional rentals. Consensus of the Council was to have staff communicate with the County regarding their plans for possible joint funding and all other possible options for such a center. Council Member Smith suggested speaking with the amphitheater group regarding the project. She agreed with the possibility of making the Civic Center more usable for rentals. Consensus of the Council was to proceed with additional exploration regarding the issue with the County and the universities for possibilities. Council Member Smith asked if a bond election would be needed to build a convention center. City Manager Harrell replied yes. 7. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding amending the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations and development fees. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval.) Frank Robbins, Executive Director of Planning and Development, stated that this was a substantial amendment to the Subdivision and Land Development regulations. One of the most significant changes in the ordinance dealt with streamlining and approval of minor 382 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 12 plats by the staff. The proposed change with minor plats would allow the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve minor plats. Variances would still be considered by the Council as was the current procedure. Major preliminary plats were now considered by the Council and it was proposed that they be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Major final plats were not considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission but would be considered by the Commission per the proposal. A major plat which was less than five acres and with no infrastructure was currently combined into a preliminary and final plat and considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. This procedure would not change. Council Member Cott felt that in order to achieve what the City wanted to in the ETJ, it was necessary to think in terms of fewer restrictions rather than more. He asked what would be gained by speeding up the process. Robbins replied that in some cases, six days of time could be saved for the development and consultant fees. In some cases as much as 30 days might be saved. Most plats involved six days and the cost savings from city review and paperwork would be $30. Mayor Castleberry stated that it would be more user friendly. Council Member Perry stated that minor plats were designed in the proposed ordinance to be done by the staff and the Planning and zoning Commission. Everything in the Denton Development Plan applied to minor plats and that meant if the neighborhood did not want a proposal, the 80% rule would apply. Robbins replied that the 80% rule would only apply in some situations such as variances because of the State law on standards and rules of variances. Council Member Miller asked if variances w~uld come to Council. Robbins replied correct depending on the type of variance as there were two kinds of variances. Variances to the requirements to build public improvements would go to Council. A variance to a design standard such as a slope to a street, would still be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The ordinance added criteria for those types of variances. The amending of plats was currently not addressed in the ordinance and was proposed to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Vacating plats, development of plats and conveyance of plats were also not currently addressed in the ordinance and were proposed to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The development plat was a major change adopted by a State legislature provision City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 13 383 and would be necessary for development. No subdivision platting was needed. Council Member Perry stated that amending plats, conveyance of plats, and vacating of plats was not in the ordinance. Robbins replied that they were not addressed in the existing ordinance but were addressed in the proposed ordinance and were enabled by State law. Council Member Perry asked if State law mandated or was permissive in this area. Robbins replied it was permissive. Another issue was the development of a single tract subdivided prior to January 1, 1960. Currently those were required to plat and a decision was made by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Council. The proposal would not require platting. To develop a smaller portion of a larger tract owned by one individual within the ETJ, currently required a final plat on the tract. More details would be required for a general development plan on a larger tract. Standards for residential replat notices were inconsistent with the State law and the proposal would follow State law. Government initiated vacation was currently not addressed in the ordinance but was proposed to be added. Another added provision was that utilities could not serve an unplatted development. The final plat finished floor elevation for buildings in or near the 100 year flood plain would be added. Pubic improvement guarantees, performance bonds and escrows would be changed to be in accordance with State law. Single family residential interior sidewalks would not have to be built interior to a subdivision if the cost was $25,000 or less and that money could be placed in an escrow account. Council Member Cott asked for the action if a proposal was denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Robbins replied that it could go to Council. Council Member Cott stated that if a proposal were denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission, Council had to discuss the proposal. Robbins replied no. If an individual did not agree with a provision before a decision had been made or before it was placed on an agenda, he could discuss that provision with Staff, Council or the City Manager to try and change the provision. During the process at a meeting, those issues could be brought up again. After the process was completed, Council could investigate. Another issue 384 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 14 was intersection spacing on a local street. The current ordinance required a 200' spacing between intersections on a local street. The proposal would allow a spacing of 100'. A chart of current fees versus proposed fees as indicated in Attachment i in the agenda back-up materials was presented. Council Member Cott felt that much of the total cost was labor associated with the fees and that all costs needed to be absorbed. Brock motioned, Miller seconded to direct staff to move ahead with the amendments as proposed at this meeting. Mayor Castleberry asked if the motion included moving ahead with the procedure. Mayor Pro Tem Brock and Council Member Miller indicated yes. Council Member Cott felt that there needed to be a way to discuss the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission might have one set of objectives and the Council have a broader based set on how a project might fit into the development of the City. He felt that there was a need to absorb all costs for fees. He was concerned about a movement into Ray Roberts with no checks and balances. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "nay", Miller "aye", Smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried with a 6-1 vote. 8. The Council reviewed the proposed 1994-95 budget hearing schedule and gave staff direction. City Manager Harrell presented the expanded schedule for budget hearings with the department heads making presentations following the filing of the proposed budget at the eRd of the month. Staff needed direction on where to hold the budget discussions and whether or not to televise them. Consensus of the Council was that the proposed schedule was acceptable. Mayor Pro 'Tem Brock indicated support to move the budget sessions to the Council Chambers in order to make those sessions as accessible as possible and would like those sessions televised. Council Member P~rry asked that an effort be made to have the sessions broadcasted on radio as well if the session were going to be televised. 385 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 12, 1994 Page 15 Consensus of the Council was to televise the sessions. 10. The Council considered approval of a resolution in support of the Denton County Courthouse-on-the-Square Sprinkler System Grant application. City Manager Harrell stated that the County came to the City late on Friday to request support of a County grant application. The County would be applying for ISTEA funding for the federal portion of the grant. The resolution only endorsed the effort of the County to sprinkle the Courthouse. The following resolution was considered: NO. R94-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS IN SUPPORT OF THE DENTON COUNTY COURTHOUSE-ON-THE-SQUARE SPRINKLER SYSTEM GRANT APPLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Miller motioned, Chew seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Brock "aye", Cott, "aye", Miller "aye", smith "aye", Chew "aye", Perry "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 11. There was no Executive Session held during the Regular Session. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. ~TY OF~ENTON, TEXAS ACC001F6