Loading...
Minutes January 2, 1996 CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES January 2, 1996 The Council convened into a Closed Meeting on Tuesday, January 2, 1996 at 5:45 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Biles; Council Members Brock, Cott, Krueger, Miller and Young° ABSENT: None 1. The Council considered the following in Closed Meeting: ae Legal Matters -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE Sec. 551.071 Real Estate -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE Sec. 551.072 CJ Personnel/Board Appointments -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE Sec. 551.074 The Council convened into a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, January 2, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Castleberry; Mayor Pro Tem Biles; Council Members Brock, Cott, Krueger, Miller and Young. ABSENT: None 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Castleberry presented the Yard of the Month awards to: Clint Ballard, Jr. and Dan Martin for the Balmar Building G. T. & Mary Lilliard Mrs. Mildred Hodges Troy & Sarah LaGrone Robert & Ann Richardson Denton Medical Plaza 2. Citizen Reports A. The Council received a citizen report from Willie Hudspeth regarding the meeting times for the City's Boards and Commissions. Mr. Hudspeth was not present at the meeting. 3. Public Hearings A. The Council held a public hearing on the proposed CIP recommendations presented by the Blue Ribbon CIP Committee. Joe Mulroy, Chair-Blue Ribbon Committee, stated that he was here to answer any questions which might arise during the public hearing. 123 124 City of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 Page 2 The Mayor opened the public hearing. Johnny Taylor stated that he represented Denton B6ys Baseball in the City of Denton. He urged the Council to approve the CIP Blue Ribbon Committee's recommendations for more ball fields. Fred Gossett stated that a great effort had produced a document which addressed the needs of the entire community. As a business resident of the community, he felt that he was a part of the process and that there was a strong consensus on the recommendations of the committee. He was willing to work in any way possible to help pass the bond election. Richard Hayes stated that the CIP was a significant document for the citizens of Denton. The recommendations addressed many areas in safety, fire, etc. It also addressed areas of the business community which he supported. Chuck Carpenter stated that he was speaking on behalf of the Denton Chamber Board of Directors. Several high priorities were included in the CIP which they supported including transportation into and out of the Denton Municipal Airport. He felt comfortable that all sides had been listened to and all areas of the City were recognized. The Mayor closed the public hearing. B. The Council held a public hearing and considered an ordinance providing for an amendment to the Detailed Plan for PD- 108 zoning district classification and use designation for a 0.371 acre tract located on the north side of Highland Street approximately 62 feet east from Carroll Boulevard. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0). Frank Robbins, Director of Planning and Development, stated that this was a simple amendment to a planned development which would change the footprint of the building that had already been approved. There was a new and corrected detailed plan for the Council to consider. It allowed a larger building footprint than the adopted planned development. The ordinance also allowed for personal services uses to be added to the buildings. The only amendment was a different footprint with the same size but to allow personal services uses in the building. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Dale Irwin stated that he would answer any questions of Council. Council Member Young asked about opposition from the neighbors. Irwin stated that one resident at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting asked about drainage but had no problem with the City of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 ~ ...... ~'~'~ Page 3 proposal. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 96-001 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE DETAILED PLAN FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 108 (PD10$) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR A 0.371 ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND STREET APPROXIMATELY 62 FEET EAST FROM CARROLL BOULEVARD; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Young motioned, Brock seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Miller "aye", Young "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Brock "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. C. The Council held a public hearing and considered an ordinance providing for a change from General Retail (GR) zoning district classification and use designation to the Commercial Conditioned (C(c)) zoning district classification and use designation for 1.031 acres of land located on the north side of US Highway 380, approximately 240 feet west of Cooper Creek Road. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0). Frank Robbins, Director of Planning and Development, stated that this was a change in zoning from general retail to commercial with conditions. The only condition associated with the district was the change in some of the uses. There was no increase in intensity with the proposal. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Dan Pettus stated that as the petitioner he was requesting approval of the proposal. He would answer any Council questions. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 96-002 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM THE GENERAL RETAIL (GR) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO THE COMMERCIAL CONDITIONED (C[c]) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 1.031 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE 125 126 City of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 Page 4 OF US HIGHWAY 380, APPROXIMATELY 240 FEET WEST OF COOPER CREEK ROAD; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,00.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Brock motioned, Biles seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Miller "aye", Young "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Brock "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. D. The Council held a public hearing and considered an ordinance providing for a change from the Agricultural (A) (with SUP 180) zoning district and use designation to the Office Conditioned (O[c]) zoning district classification and use designation for 8.3271 acres of land described as Lot 1, Block 1, of the YMCA Addition, located on the northwest corner of Riney Road and Windsor Drive. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0). Frank Robbins: Director of Planning and Development, stated that the office conditions for this proposal included a maximum size of the office at 3,500 square feet and only office professional administrative uses would be allowed. The existing YMCA specific use permit would be incorporated into the ordinance. The DISD intended to use the building as offices. If the YMCA returned to the site, their specific use permit would be preserved. The Mayor opened the pubic hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 96-003 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM THE AGRICULTURAL (A) (WITH SUP 180) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO THE OFFICE CONDITIONED (O[¢]) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR 8.3271 ACRES OF LAND DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OF THE YMCA ADDITION; LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RINEY ROAD AND WINDSOR DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Young motioned, Krueger seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Miller "aye", Young "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Brock "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. City of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 Page 5 E. The Council held a public hearing and considered an ordinance providing for an amendment to the Detailed Plan of Lots 44R - 51R of the Woodlands of Township II, a portion of Planned Development District Six PD-6 located on the east side of Timberidge Street, south of Wilderness Street. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0). Frank Robbins, Director of Planning and Development, stated that the only change in this existing planned development would be with the setbacks which were now associated with Lots 44R-51R. The existing side setbacks were 5' and 23' to be changed to 6' side setbacks for all the lots. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Hellany Fleedman stated that she was representing the owner of the property who was wanting to amend the side yards for the proposal. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 96-004 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE DETAILED PLAN OF LOTS 44R-51F OF THE WOODLANDS OF TOWNSHIP II, A PORTION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SIX (PD-6) LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF TIMBERIDGE STREET, SOUTH OF WILDERNESS STREET; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FORAN EFFECTIVE DATE. Biles motioned, Brock seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Miller "aye", Young "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Brock "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. F. The Council held a public hearing and considered an ordinance amending Ordinances 83-140 and 87-054 by approving a Detailed Plan for a 1.199 acre tract of land within the Planned Development 65 (PD 65) zoning district classification and use designation, located on the west side of FM2181 at its intersection with Bent Oaks Drive. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 5- 1). Council Member Cott left the meeting with a potential conflict of interest. Frank Robbins, Director for Plannin~ and DeveloDment, ~tated that this proposal was to adopt a detailed plan in a planned development which indicated one story offices. The original planned development was adopted in 1984. The property was significantly 127 128 City of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 Page 6 landscaped in excess of the current standards and the area between the parking lot and the building at Teasley Lane had a substantial green area in which many trees would be planted. The architecture of the building was being adopted as part of the planned development. Initially there was significant neighborhood opposition to the proposal as a number of individuals did not know the area was zoned office. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Marvin Morgan stated that if the proposal was approved two office buildings would be built on the site. He requested approval of the proposal. Ed Bright stated that he was owner of one of the lots. He was excited about the opportunity to have two buildings mirrored in architecture on the sites. He requested support for the proposal. He had met with a number of the neighbors in the area and felt that they were in agreement with the proposal. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Council Member Brock stated that no zoning change was being asked for with this proposal. The zoning had been in place since 1984 and this was only one step in the planned development process. Mayor Castleberry asked about a brick wall behind the properties. Bright stated that there would be a wall along the entire length of the two lots. The usage would be only administrative offices. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 96-005 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCES 83-140 AND 87-054 BY APPROVING A DETAILED PLAN FOR A 1.199 ACRE TRACT OF LAND WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 65 (PD65) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF FM2181 AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH BENT OAKS DRIVE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUMAMOUNT OF $2,000 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Young motioned, Biles seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Miller "aye", Young "aye", Krueger "aye", Brock "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Cott returned to the meeting. G. The Council held a public hearing with regard to the proposed annexation of a 11.34 acre tract located east of Mayhill Road and north of Blagg Road (A-69). (The Planning and Zoning City of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 Page 7 Commission recommended approval 6-0). Harry Persuad, Senior Planner, stated that this was the first of a series of public hearings for this proposed annexation. This annexation was proposed by the City and a service plan on how the City proposed to provide municipal services to the tract had been prepared. Staff had contacted the residents in the area through letters informing them of the public hearings and invited them to the discussions. The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Council Member Young asked about opposition from citizens in the area. Persuad stated that one property owner wrote a letter months before the proposal went to the Planning and Zoning Commission indicating her disagreement with the annexation on the grounds that it would cost her a large sum of money to provide her own water and wastewater services. At the same time he also received a letter from a property owner expressing no objection to the process. He had also spoken to other property owners in the area who did not indicate any opposition. Council Member Young asked if water and sewer services would be provided when the property was annexed. Persuad stated that at this point in time, the residents had exiting water wells and septic tanks. Council Member Young asked if this area would be included on the Public Utilities Board list for infill. Persuad stated that the list was being complied of areas which were now in the City limits and which were in critical need of water and wastewater services. This area was not on that list. Council Member Krueger left meeting. Council Member Young requested that this area be included on the list. Persuad stated that as part of the CIP program, all areas which were annexed into the City limits and which needed water and wastewate~ se~vice~ would be considered as par% of %he tiP. Council Member Krueger returned to the meeting. 129 130 City of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 Page 8 Council Member Young asked about sidewalks and when the street would be fixed. Persuad stated that those would be considered as part of the CIP program. Mayor Pro Tem Biles left the meeting. Council Member Krueger asked who initiated the annexation. Persuad stated that the annexation was initiated by the City. Council Member Krueger asked why this property was needed in the City. Persuad stated that the policies in the City's code required that the staff conduct an annexation study when significant developments were proposed or had occurred in the extraterritorial jurisdiction. Recently a 23,200 square foot office/warehouse development had occurred in the area. An annexation study had recently been completed and it was proposed to Council to proceed with the annexation. Council Member Krueger stated that these eleven acres included the Sally's building. Persuad replied correct. Mayor Castleberry stated that the property was not owned by Sally Beauty Supply but was rather leased by Sally. Miller motioned, Brock proceed with the annexation as scheduled. On roll vote, Miller "aye", Young "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Brock "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. H. The Council held a public hearing with regard to the proposed annexation of a 21.62 acre tract described as the Estates of Forrestridge Section II (A-70). Harry Persuad, Senior Planner, stated that the proposed annexation was petitioned by the land owners for annexation and zoning. The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Persaud stated that the purpose of this public hearing was to receive comments from members of the public and a vote was not necessary by the Council. City of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 Page 11 .... ~.~?~?i~'~ to problems with parking in the area. The current parking interfered with a driveway coming out of an apartment complex and with the left turn lane in the area. He had spoken with the apartment owner who indicated that the complex had adequate on-site parking. ~ ~ "~:~,~. :, · Council Member Young returned to the meeting. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 96-008 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, WHICH PROHIBITS THE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN PORTIONS OF OAK STREET; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00); PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Biles motioned, Brock seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Miller "aye", Young "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Brock "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. B. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for one-way traffic on certain portions of Highland Street and Maple Street. (The Traffic Safety Commission recommended approval 7-o). Council Member Miller left the meeting. Jerry Clark, Director of Engineering and Transportation, stated that this was a request of the University of North Texas. Highland Street currently ran westbound and Maple ran eastbound. The University was interested in changing its entranceways in the area and the change would facilitate traffic movement. There was a small cost associated with signage changes which the university would pay for. Council Member Miller returned to the meeting. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 96-O09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR ONE- WAY TRAFFIC ON CERTAIN PORTIONS OF HIGHLAND STREET AND MAPLE STREET; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS ($200.00); AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Brock motioned, Biles seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Miller "aye", Young "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Brock 133 134 City of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 Page 12 "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 8. The Council considered a motion to adjust the compensation of the City Attorney. Young motioned, Biles seconded to establish a performance rating for the City Attorney of "Exceeding the requirements and standards of the job", and that effective April 15, 1996, in accordance with the Council adopted pay increase program that the City Attorney's salary increase by 7%. On roll vote, Miller "aye", Young "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Brock "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 9. The Council held a discussion and gave staff direction concerning the Development Policy committee. Frank Robbins, Director for Planning and Development, stated that staff was requesting direction regarding membership on the Development Policy Committee which would be reviewing and making recommendations on amendments to the Denton Development Plan. At a meeting with the neighborhood groups, a recommendation was brought forth by the groups to increase the number of neighborhood representatives from 1 to 2 per Council district for a total of $ representatives. Another issue was the method of nominating those representatives. Council's direction was that the neighborhood associations would make the nominations. Those groups were not well represented at the earlier meeting. If Council desired, the method of nomination might be changed to nominations from neighborhoods rather than from neighborhood groups. Council Member Cott felt that another meeting was needed in order to get a feel for the number of representatives. He felt it was premature to do the nominations at this meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Biles stated that the prior suggestion generated by staff was that there be four representatives of the City's geographic areas, one from each Council district, chosen by neighborhood associations. He felt that the neighborhood associations were not well defined and as a result, a group might not be well defined but still have a formal means of communication with all neighbors in the area. The mechanism of representation of four representatives by associations was restricted to single member districts. He felt this should an open process and each Council Member should make an appointment from the neighborhoods. This would increase the representation from four to seven and would not be an artificial representation. Council Member Brock felt that there was a need for ordinary eiti~en~ to be ~eD~e~ented on the Committee. The~e was a need to continue to encourage neighborhood involvement and felt that the associations needed to be included in the process. She felt that city of Denton city Council Minutes January 2, 1996 ~.~ !,~ Page 13 the neighborhood associations should make the recommendations for suggested appointees. Mayor Pro Tem Biles pointed out that there was a number of geographical areas where there were no formal neighborhood organizations. He suggested that the single member Council Members appointment someone in their district and the at-large Council Members chose from the entire City which would allow for formal and informal organizations to have representation. Miller motioned, Biles seconded to change the representation from four citizens to seven. The appointment would be made in early February which would give the Council an opportunity to visit with the upcoming neighborhood meeting in late January. The Council would receive input from the neighborhood associations as to citizens who might like to serve on this committee. Each Council Member would nominate one person from citizens in the community with the understanding of trying to have representation of citizens throughout the community who would be identified with neighborhood issues. Council Member Cott stated that the sole reason for this organization to get together was to do the Denton Development Plan and it had nothing to do with anything other than the Development Plan. He suggested postponing the issue for several months in order to better inform individuals of the proposal. Mayor Castleberry stated that there were only 23 people present at the meeting for all the neighborhood associations throughout the City. Robbins stated that 40% of those present were not there because of the formal invitation but were there from word-of-mouth or through the newspaper. Council Member Miller felt that the neighborhood meeting could still be held and inform the citizens that the discussion would be on the Development Guide. That would start the process of letting the neighborhoods know that they would be involved in the process. Mayor Pro Tem Biles stated that the majority of the people at that meeting were there for the wrong reasons. They were not there knowing the reason was for the process of updating the Denton Development Guide. Staff needed to make clear, for the next meeting, that the meeting would be to work on the Denton Development Guide. Mayor Castleberry felt that the Council might not be ready to make appointments in February. Miller changed his motion to delete the February date. The process would be that each Council Member would nominate a person who represented neighborhoods. The makeup of the committee would be 135 136 city of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 Page 14 changed to reflect seven representatives, one from each Council Member. Biles accepted the change to his second. On roll vote, Miller "aye" Young "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye" Brock "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. 10. The Council held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding extending hours for the sale of alcohol on premises from 12:00 midnight until 2:00 a.m. Council Member Cott felt that this was a business strategy for the City of Denton. He felt that the city needed to provide this activity for a growing city or be left behind by people with the dollars. The hours should be extended until 2:00 a.m. for anything which was permitted by State law. Mayor Castleberry stated that Council Member Cott had requested that this item be placed on the agenda to extend on-premise alcohol consumption from midnight until 2:00 a.m. Council Member Young felt that this was a business issue and a safety issue. People left the City of Denton to go to other places where there were extended hours. He was in favor of extending the hours and requested an ordinance for Council consideration at the next meeting. This would also provide extra revenue to the City. The merchants would set up a system to provide rides for those who were unable to drive. Mayor Castleberry asked if on-premise referred to private clubs and restaurants. Council Member Young replied correct. He also felt this would help the entertainment business in Denton. He motioned to extend the hours for on-premise consumption to 2:00 a.m. Council Member Cott seconded Council Member Young's request. He stated that the ordinance would be for beer, wine and mixed drinks at any internal location such as a bar, a restaurant, etc. Council Member Brock stated that based on information given to her by the City Attorney, she would like to have an ordinance dealing with off-premise sales also. As she understood it, the State law might not allow the City to restrict those hours to places of on- premise consumption. city Attorney Prouty stated that it was not known yet as to how the law was interpreted. In the instance of beer or wine for extended hours on-premises, there was a relationship between one section of the Alcoholic Beverage Code which also seemed to indicate that when City of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 Page 15 beer and wine sales was extended to 2:00 a.m., the off-premise hours may also be extended. His office was doing more research on the issue. Council Member Miller asked if a late hour permit would be required in order to have an establishment remain open. City Attorney Prouty stated that there was a second requirement. Denton was currently a standard hour city in ~nich those premises which were permitted to serve alcoholic beverages could do so six days until midnight and on Sunday until 1 a.m. The proposed ordinance would extend the hours in which seven days a week any late hours permittee would be able to sell alcoholic beverages until 2:00 a.m. The establishment would have to have, in addition to an extended hours ordinance, a late hours permit. The late hours permit would be required in the ordinance and the ordinance would extend the hours and the extended hours would be available to anyone with a late hours permit. Council Member Miller stated that if a Council Member voted for the motion, there would still be an ordinance for Council consideration with public input. On roll vote, Miller "aye", Young "aye", Cott "aye", Krueger "aye", Brook "aye", Biles "aye", and Mayor Castleberry "aye". Motion carried unanimously. Council Member Brock suggested that the Legal Department research the various issues and return with alternative ordinances for Council to consider. 11. Vision Update Council Member Brock stated that a formal vote from Council was needed soon regarding the City's commitment to the vision process. 12. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. Rick Svehla, Acting City Manager, did not have any items for Council. 13. There was no official action taken on Closed Meeting Items discussed earlier. 14. New Business The following items of New Business were suggested by Council Members for future agendas: A. Council Member Young asked for background information on a volunteer fire department. 137 138 City of Denton City Council Minutes January 2, 1996 Page 16 15. There was no continuation of the Closed Meeting during the Regular Session. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. ~NNIF~.~ WALTERS - - - ~ITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ACC002DF