Loading...
Minutes July 9, 1996 MINUTES CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL July 9, 1996 A Closed Meeting of the City of Denton City Council was held on Tuesday, July 9, 1996 at 5:45 p.m. in the Civil Defense Room of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items were considered: Closed Meeting: A. Legal Matters -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE Sec. 551.071 B. Real Estate -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE Sec. 551.072 Personnel/Board Appointments -- Under TEX. GOV'T CODE Sec. 551.074 Work Session oft he City of Denton City Council onTuesday, July 9, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of City Hall, 215 E. McKinney, Denton, Texas at which the following items were considered: 1. Received and discussed a recommendation and gave staff direction to combine the Juvenile Diversionary Services of Denton and the Juvenile Crime Interagency Coalition. Harlan Jefferson reported that in 1993 Council created the Juvenile Diversionary Task Force. It was designed to study juvenile issues within the city limitsth°fe Denton. In 1994, three (3) recommendations were made by group and approved by the Council. The first was to provide counselling for juveniles and their families. Secondly, they recommended the creation of the Teen Court. Thirdly, they recommended the creation of the Juvenile Interagency Coalition. The Juvenile Interagency Coalition was to provide a comprehensive response to juvenile issues, monitor juvenile issues throughout the year and make annual reports. Jefferson said they not only met the recommendations of the task force but exceeded them. He cited as examples that the Teen Court began in October of 1995, and through May of 1996 they prosecuted 62 defendants. More than 1600 community service hours, valued at more than $7,600 were assigned. The Teen court also accepted the responsibility for providing counselling to the community in the form of a contracts and bonus grants. They began operating a program with the help of the Boys and Girls Club to provide after school educational and recreational activities located at the Fred M6ore Learning Center. The Juvenile Interagency Coalition applled for two grants over the last year. One was a Title V delinquency and intervention grant valued at more than $ 81,000 the first year and $243,000 over a three year period. The contract and bonus grant had a value of approximately $27,000 the first year and a 472 City of Denton city Council Minutes July 9, 1996 Page 2 total of $156,000 over a five year period. He recommended combining the two groups because they create an environment of overlapping responsibility. He thought it would be a much better environment to actually combine the two groups. They ran into problems when applying for grants since the Coalition was not incorporated and did not have a separate 501(c)3. They had to use other organizations as a go between. The chairperson of the Coalition, Margaret Smith, supported the recommendation as well as the Coalition members. Jefferson said the steps to combine the groups would require Council approval of a resolution eliminating or dissolving the Coalition. Secondly, the Juvenile Diversionary Services of Denton would need to amend it's by-laws to incorporate the Council's goals and objectives contained in the resolution. They would expand from an 8 member board to a 23 member board. That was consistent with the current structure of the coalition. They would also make the annual report to the Council consistent with what was required by the current resolution creating the coalition. At least two members would be juveniles. Mayor Pro Tem Brock asked if the proposed structure would make it easier for the group to get grants. Jefferson said that was true. He further explained that one of the hurdles they dealt with was when they applied for grants with the Coalition, which was basically a city organization. Firms would say they had all the tax base needed. Also since they were not incorporated they had a difficult time applying for grants. Council Member Young asked how the Police Chief felt about combining the groups. Jefferson believed he would support the recommendation. He said some of his officers were on the Coalition as well as on the Board. Mayor Miller confirmed the recommendation which was to prepare a resolution to dissolve the Juvenile Interagency Coalition which would be combined into the Juvenile Diversionary Services of Denton. Jefferson said Staff could bring the resolution to Councll at the next meeting. They would invite all of the Coalition members to join as Board Members the Juvenile Diversionary Services. There was consensus among the Council to accept the recommendation. Mayor Miller commented that they had come a long way in the laet couple on years. He appreciated both groups and looked forward to seeing the one group. He hoped it would increase their ability to work with the juveniles and to also increase ability to get additional funding. 473 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 9, 1996 Page 3 2. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding a recommendation on bond projects from the Oversight Committee. Rick Svehla said the 91 Committee made their final report less than one year ago and staff was now bringing recommendations from the new Oversight Committee on bond projects. A llst of projects was provided to Council and Svehla said the first ten items, for the most part, used remaining money left over from projects in 1986 or projects where interest money from 1986 bonds was allocated. There were a couple of instances where the Committee recommended using the new bond money. In the last paragraph there were recommendations from the Committee to use flexible funding categories (signals, turn lanes, parks, miscellaneous drainage projects, and street reconstruction). Four members of the Oversight met on June 25, 1996, and unanimously supported the recommendation. Svehla pointed out that a couple of the recommendations had previously been approved by the Council. Those included contract for the drainage consultants to beused for the Robertson and Kerley Street culverts and also the drainage study on the second lake at South Lakes. Chairman Mulroy also visited with Brent Thorton who agreed with the recommendation. Mayor Miller asked how many members there were. Svehla replied seven. Six of the Seven member sere contacted and concurred with the recommendation. Brock referred to the item on Congestion Mitigation. She asked if reappropriating $24,000 from the Shady Oaks/Woodrow signal to the Eagle/Bernard signal would mean there would not be a signal there. Svehla replied the signal was already there. They were able to build it for less so there was money left over. He said the Committee also recommended reprogra~ming a like amount, $22,000 for the replacement of other controllers in the progression system on Carroll and University. Brock referred to the $240,000 of a miscellaneous street rebuilding for Panhandle and Egan Streets. She said the CIP funding was used as a bridging mechanism to fund rehabilitating those streets and asked if that meant they were simply being brought forward on the schedule. Svehla said every year staff sent Council a list of maintenance projects to be completed in the year. Last year staff presented the list for the current fiscal year, which would end in September. Projects were completed faster than staff thought due to the lack of rain in the winter and spring. Staff was able to finish the 474 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 9, 1996 Page 4 street projects, the water and sewer contractors relaying and replacing lines in the area were also able to finish. Svehla thought they would have another two to three months before they completed the projects so when October 1 hit they would use the normal operating fund to do the work. Svehla suggested that staff be able to use the CIP money, not operating money. He refereed to the flexible program of the CIP for street construction. A certain amount of money would be issued and held for the year in case there were economic development projects. He said it was close enough to October and there were no economic projects on the horizon where infrastructure money would be needed for streets. They would not have to use the operating funds because Council would have already allocated the CIP money. The operating money could sit there until the next year's bonds were issued. He said it was just a bridging mechanism to get through to October 1. Council Member Young asked Svehla to explain .the project for Pecan Creek and Robertson and the possibilities. Svehla responded that the contract had already been approved bythe Council. Staff was hiring consultants to design the two bridges that were being replaced on Kerley and on Robertson (east side of the railroad tracks through the underpass and across Bell Avenue. The original project was only around the railroad crossing buy for a small amount of money, $2,000 they were able to get the design all the way across Bell. Utilities also looked at rebuilding a large water line. He said staff may be able to save money by coordinating with the Utility department. Young also asked if it was in the plan to concrete Willow Creek. Svehla replied yes. He said the Kerley Street project was not just a culvert but also some channel work. Cott said it was his belief that if you had excess CIP and excess operating then you over budgeted. Svehla commented that they were not really excess funds. Precedence wise Council had done this since 1986. Based on that information, the oversight committee assumed that was the direction they should go. He said the money could be used to repay bonds but there was already an established schedule to do that. Cott said at some point he would rather come closer to reality when it comes to budgeting. He said Council over budgeted. Biles asked if street repair/maintenance funds to repair utility work. Svehla said the utility department pays for those repairs. 475 July 9, 1996 Page 5 Young asked where staff was on the Scott Street connection to Newton. Svehla said it was on the list of streets the oversight committee would look at and make a recommendation on. Young asked what needed to be done to get the oversight committee to look at it. He said it was a top priority and thought there was money in the CIP contingency fund to pay for purchase of the right of way. Svehla said that could be included in the cost. He further commented that staff built the signals themselves for less money. Biles said those kinds of measures were appreciated by Council. Miller said Council was spending dollars in 1996 that theoretically were going to be spent by 1991. The reason was that previous Council's said to the voters that they would only pass and sell bonds without increasing the tax to service the debt. Beasley served on the bond committee and oversight committee and commented the staff did an excellent job in finding the money and showing .them how they could use the money to better the city. She suggested that Council take the reco~mendation of the oversight committee and proceed with the projects. Miller asked about the timing on the Flow Hospital area, Panhandle and Egan project. Svehla said they were already on Egan and with Council's approval they would be able to proceed. If not they would have to wait until October. Young agreed but asked that Svehla take back to the committee that the Newton/Scott extension was a top priority. He said he wanted it not only on the list but on the board. 3. Received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction concerning awarding a bid for the City's group health insurance coverage for the plan year beginning January 1, 1997. This item was pulled from the agenda by the city manager to allow staff further time to study and research. He reported that the item would come before the Council in two weeks. 4. Received a report and gave gtaff direction regarding the city's pilot curbside newspaper collection program. Howard Martin said in January of 1996 Council approved a demonstration project for the curbside collection of newspapers. 476 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 9, 1996 Page 6 Collection.began on February 21. They have been collecting newspapers on two routes. Martin recommended discontinuing the pilot program. He said the two routes included about 2,500 homes. Collection of newspapers was implemented on the first and third Wednesdays of each month. Over the last four months about 50 tons of newspapers were collected. The participation was about 15% and the program cost was approximately $28,000. Martin said the overall tonnage for newspapers for the collection program and centralized drop off centers had remained stable. There had been no increase as a result of the curbside program. The drop off centers functioned well and the people who recycled newspapers enjoyed the service. Martin said staff made several conclusions from the research data. They expected a higher participation rate. When staff budgeted for the program for 1996 they looked at recycling their newspaper prices in excess of $100 per ton. The materials market for newspaper had gone to next to nothing. The had budgeted almost $150,000 in revenues based on 1,500 tons of newspapers collected at a price of $100 per ton. He said the newspapers fell way below that. If they continued to collect newspapers curbside they would continue to loose money. Young asked if they discontinued the program would the $1 on the utility bill also be discontinued. Martin said about $.75 of that dollar was identified for the curbside program or about $146,000. To date they had only used $26,000. On the revenue side of the picture they were looking at $152,000 in revenue from the newspapers. What they had received was $18,700 in revenue which equates to a $130,000 shortfall. The $118,000 in unexpended funds would not cover the shortfall in revenues. Young asked if the collection drop off points would stay in place. Martin responded yes. Young said they had been successful and asked if they thought about increasing the number of drop off points. Martin thought the mo=t effective way to collect the materialg for the community was to improve on the convenience of the drop off centers. He said they were looking at establishing 3 centers for multi-materials. Mayor Pro Tem Brock asked if there were containers for people to put materials in. She asked if there were specific instructions. Martin said before starting the program they had neighborhood meetings and also left door hangers with instructions on how to bundle the papers. They were asked to put the papers in paper 477 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 9, 1996 Page 7 grocery bags. Brock made several points as a result of telephones calls she received prior to the meeting. One person felt the effort was effective for people who already recycled. She felt there had not been sufficient communication. Brock felt there were larger issues than the dollars and cents. She wanted to know the cost for a year of landfill use. Martin said the landfill budget was right at $1,000,000. The cubic yard price was about $7. Brock said newspapers that were not recycled were going in the landfill and they would be spending an enormous amount to purchase land to expand the landfill. By keeping more newspapers out of the landfill the life would be expended. Martin said when they developed the master plan there goal was a 50% waste diversion rate over a 20 year period. He said if they were able to accomplish that as a community they would save approximately 20 years on the proposed landfill site. Krueger said if his neighborhood had been chosen for the pilot program, he would have used the service. After the program ended he said he would continue to recycle. Brock said there were dollars and cents issues beyond the pilot project. Krueger said the same people who used the curbside program were probably the same people using the drop off centers. Martin said people would continue to save their papers; it just would not be quite as convenient. Biles said he also received calls. He did not feel the door hangers were sufficient to get the message out. He suggested that anytime staff engaged in a prospective endeavor like that they needed to enhance the communication effort. They also needed to do reminders. He wanted to know what further alternatives there were in expanding the drop off sites. It was a prudent decision to discontinue the curbside because the dollars would not be self sufficient even if they factored in the lifetime of the landfill. Biles suggested that staff take a look at enhancing the fall back position. Martin responded that the outcome of collecting 52 tons at $7 per cubic yard would only be about $900 to $1,000 worth of landfill space. He also said they should have done a better job with communicating. He said if you did not collect every week, people 478 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 9, 1996 Page 8 had a hard time remembering. Beasley said in the conclusion of the study staff mentioned an intermediate processing center being moved back to 1998. She asked if that included newspaper. Martin said the intermediate center was geared to be a multi- material separation center. That was an outcome of the Solid Waste Master plan committee recommendations. It was originally scheduled for design the current year with construction next year but that has been delayed. Beasley wondered if a significant amount of recycling could be done without going to mandatory recycling. She was not ready to go to mandatory recycling and asked if the city currently generated enough recyclables to need a processing center. Martin said they looked at that issue as a committee and felt that by the year 1998 if they were to be in the neighborhood of 30 - 50 percent participation they would be able to start an intermediate processing center. There would be approximately 40 tons per day of recycled material at that point. Beasley asked that staff continue to look at the effects on the landfill and at some time in the future mandatory recycling might be necessary. Martin said when they got into the budget discussions on the solid waste side in particular they would come with a budget continuing the recycling efforts. They were looking at the benefits derived from public private partnerships. There was interest from various private entities and the PUB had given staff direction to put together a program that made sense for the Denton community in partnership with the private entities. Young said the study was successful and staff learned a lot. Me said it would be a lot better when private enterprise built a center close. That would make it a lot easier to implement a program like that. The study put recycling on the minds of the citizen~ of Denton by increasing the numhe~ of d~op off point~. Miller said the yard waste program did more for diversion from the landfill. Martin said the separate yard waste collection was the most meaningful program you could do on the residential side. It diverted more waste than any other single program. Miller said that 75% of what went into the landfill came from commercial and 25 % or less came from residential. The work the 479 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 9, 1996 Page 9 city could did with the commercial and industrial customer would have a much greater impact on the landfill. Martin agreed and said in the budget they focused a majority of their efforts on the commercial side. Miller was surprised at the 15% participation rate. He asked if there was any idea of the kind of participation in neighborhoods where there was no curbside pickup. Martin said they spent a lot of time benchmarking the solid waste program against other communities and those with curbside. The average participation rates around 30% - 35%. The Council concurred with staff's recommendation. Biles asked that staff increase the number of sites and communication about drop off sites. 5. Received a report, held a discussion, and gave staffdirection regarding the purchase of public officiaIs' liability insurance. Max Blackburn, Risk Manager, said in 1992 Council asked staff to purchase public official's liability insurance. He said for four years the premiums remained constant at $32,240 per year. Unfortunately premiums went up about $13,000. Blackburn noted reasons for the increase. Part of the reason was the 4 claims filed with the insurance company. Also in the recommendation Blackburn suggested that Council buy a choice of counsel. Biles concurred with the recommendation. Young also concurred with the recommendation. Krueger asked when the present policy expired. Blackburn responded July 17. He said if the Council concurred it would be placed on the next consent agenda. Cott asked if the policy covered the Council. Blackburn said it covered employees, the Council, and all of the boards except airport and public utility. It would also cover the economic development committee. Cott said if the city would not carry any insurance at all where would the break even point be for the city. Blackburn responded that over the past four years the city paid in more premiums that we had gotten back because of the $25,000 480 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 9, 1996 Page 10 deductible. He further commented that there had not been any severe cases, only 3 employment litigations and 1 zoning. Cott asked what was staff's recommendation. Blackburn recommended that the city purchase public official's liability insurance with choice of counsel. Miller asked if the airport board and the others were included in other policies. Blackburn responded no but the city was self insured. Biles clarified that the city did have the indemnification ordinance that would address the issue. Council concurred with the recommendation. The Council convened into a Special Called Meeting at which the following items were considered: 1. Consider approval of a resolution appointing David Garcia, Kim Cawley, and Earlean Murphy as Assistant City Judges for the City of Denton Court Municipal of Record; authorizing the Mayor to execute contracts for their terms of office. Council considered approval of the following resolution: R96-154 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPOINTING DAVID GARCIA, KIMCAWLEY, AND EARLEANMURPHY AS ASSISTANT CITY JUDGES FOR THE CITY OF DENTON MUNICIPAL COURT OF RECORD; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE CONTRACTS FOR THEIR TERMS OF OFFICE. Beasley motioned, Brock seconded for approval of the resolution. on roll vote tort, aye; Brook, aye; Beasley, aye; Miller, aye; Biles, aye; Young, aye; Krueger, aye. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Council considered nominations/appointments to the city's Boards and Commissions. Joe Dodd, 1107 Greenlee, addressed the Council. He said he was in the rears on his taxes. The charter said you must not be in a rears to the City. Those rules bound the Council and boards and commissions. Dodd said three Council Members were involved in 481 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 9, 1996 Page 11 changing those rules. At that meeting there was also a discussion about Council Members saying tacky things about nominees in open session. The solution was to go with a lottery and draw names for who would make appointments to which boards. Dodd said it was lovely at the time but council changed and some people inherited loosing positions in the lottery. The new solution appeared to be that every one got one pick if the law allowed it. He felt that was wrong. The idea was to nominate the best person for the committee and it was voted on by the Council. See attachment A for nominations/appointments. 3. Considered and approved an ordinance amending Section 2-62 "Conflict of Interest" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton to provide that no member of a board or commission of the city that exercised any sovereign function of government independent of the control of the city council shall be financially interested in certain transactions with the city; amending Section 2-83 "General Rules" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Denton to define personal interest ~s a financial interest; providing for a definition of financial interest; providing a savings clause; listing hoards which have sovereign municipal functions. Herb Prouty, City Attorney, explained that the ordinance was much broader than the city charter. It had a test for determining whether a board was discretionary and whether it's me~bers were officers which was different than that set down by the supreme court or the state. The ordinance substituted for the test of a . board having final decision making authority. The new test and the Aldene Independent School District Test of a board which exercised any sovereign function of municipal government independent of the control of the City Council. Secondly, the ordinance defined for the first time what was meant by financial interest. The same definition was adopted in the ordinance that was set forth in Section 177.002 of the local government code which defined public officials conflict of interest as the substantial interest in a business entity test. That test was very specific as to what type of financial interest triggered conflict provisions. He said they listed boards and commissions which had traditionally been defined as exercising independent sovereign municipal functions. Prouty briefly discussed changes in the ordinance since Council received their backup material for the meeting. On the last paragraph of the bottom of the last page, independent municipal sovereign functions was substituted for the phrase financial decision making authority. The traditional boards that they felt were discretionary boards were also re-examined. After looking at it again it was decided that the Historic Landmark Commission was not a discretionary board because even though it exercised some quasi judicial powers there was an appeal to the City Council in those 482 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 9, 1996 Page 12 cases. That left seven boards on the list. Joe Dodd addressed the Council. He said the constitution of the United States had nothing to do with him. The constitution had rules about how government reacts, what government could do to him. The city charter was not a set of rules that had very much to do with him but was a set of rules to be used to govern him. He said it was the least offensive weaseling around the charter he had seen in years. He also suggested that Council take the opportunity to go back and revisit other things that were wrong with the charter and simply pass an ordinance saying "in the case of governing Denton these words mean" and then put out a new definition of words when it applied to what the charter could or could not do. He said the charter was old, it put limits on Council that gave them real headaches in running the city efficiently. He said they could not just go around it for their benefit. He advised the Council to come up with rules they thought were good fair, efficient and submit them to the public and see if they would allow Council to operate under those sets of rules. He said not to set the committees up so that everyone got one shot, and do not weasel around the charter. The biggest thing wrong with going around the charter on that or any other issue was that those rules governed council's behavior and if they found ways around it why should he respect the rules of how he should have to behave. Prouty stressed that the charter was not being amended. He said one of the prime reasons for the amendment was that it was worked more broadly than the charter. He said there was not definition of financial interest in the charter and that had been a problem because they had to look at it on a case by case basis. There was one definition of financial interest in state law. It was a very specific definition, the substantial financial interest in a business entity test in Section 171 of the Local Government Code. Prouty said it was questionable whether a court would say that also applied to the city charter. Young motioned, Krueger second to approve the amended ordinance. ORDINANCE 96-028 AN ORDINANCEAMENDING SECTION 2-62 "CONFLICT OF INTEREST" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO PROVIDE THAT NO MEMBER OF A BOARD OR COMMISSION OF THE CITY THAT EXERCISES ANY SOVEREIGN FUNCTION OF GOVERNMENT INDEPENDENT OF THE CONTROL OF THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL BE FINANCIALLY INT~R~$T~D IN CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WITH THE CITY; AMENDING SECTION 2-83 "GENERAL RULES" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DENTON TO DEFINE PERSONAL INTEREST AS A FINANCIAL INTEREST; PROVIDING FOR A DEFINITION OF FINANCIAL INTEREST; PROVIDING A SAVINGS 483 City of Denton City Council Minutes July 9, 1996 Page 13 CLAUSE; LISTING BOARDS WHICH HAVE SOVEREIGN MUNICIPAL FUNCTIONS. On roll vote, Cott, aye; Brock, aye~ Beasley, aye; Miller, aye; Biles, aye~ Young, aye; and Krueger, aye. Motion passed unanimously. With no further business the meeting was adjourned. Veronica S. Rolen Deputy City Secretary 484 ATTACHMENT 1 Agendaltem BOARD/COMMISSION NOMINATIONS Date 1996-97 AZRPORT ~DVZSORY BOA~D Dis~ CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL *7 John Dulemba *3 Don Smith *4 James Jamieson *5 Jim Risser Terry Garland Ann Houston James Jamieson 'Jim Risser 1994-96 Miller 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Cott 1994-96 Beasley ~ BH~T~R ADVZSO~¥ BOARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER *2 Joella Orr Joella Orr TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Krueger BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DIST CURRENT MEMBER *5 3 *4 *2 Rebecca King Bob Hagemann Joe Bendzick Larry Collister NOMINATION Rebecca King Greg Muirhead Joe Bendzick Larry Collister TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Beasley 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Cott 1994-96 Krueger BUILDING CODE BOARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL *3 James Fykes (ALT) *4 Byron Woods (ALT) *5 Steve Kniatt *6 (Mary McCain) (Architect) *7 Greg Muirhead Bob Hagemann Byron Woods Steve Kniatt Mary McCain Ken Dobias 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Cott 1994-96 Beasley 1994-96 Brock' 1994-96 Miller * No * Individual nominated and approved Individual nominated but not approved No nomination CABLE TV ADVXSORY BOAI~ DIST CURRENT MEMBER *5 2 Mark Burroughs Richard Rodean NOMINATION Mark Burroughs COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVIBORY C~TTT~U DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION *5 *6 *7 3 *5 Dorothy Martinez Peggy Fox Jean Ellen Rogers LarryBailey Ann Hatch Jean Hinojosa Peggy Fox Jean Ellen Rogers Kimberly Franklin Ann Hatch DATA PROCBSBINGADVISORY BOARD DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION 2 3 *4 Rosa Lawton Bruce Mitchell Renae Seely Warren Searls Renae Seely DOWNT0WNADVISORYBOAI~ DIST 3 *4 *5 *6 *7 CURRENT MEMBER Geneva Berg Joanna Deonath Joy Williams Michael Flanagan Rahna Raney George ~oen Joanna Deonath Joy Williams Michael Monticino Bette Sherman A. - .. vefloa NO.,, TERM ~ 1993-96 Beasley 1993-96 Krueger TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Beasley 1994-96 Brock 1994-96 Miller 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Beasley TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Krueger 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Cott TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Cott 1994-96 Beasley 1994-96 Brock 1994-96 Miller * No * Individual nominated and approved Individual nominated but not approved No nomination 486 ELEC~RXCAL CODE BOARD DIST SVjRRENT MEMBER 3 (John Hardinger) (Master Electrician) 4 Don Fox *1 Robert Hicks (ALT) HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DIST CURRENT MEMBER NOMINATION John Hardinger Robert Hicks NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Cott 1994-96 Young TERM COUNCIL 3 (Kenneth Morgan) (Real Property Owner) *7 Judy Cole 2 Jim Kirkpatrick B~MAN 8~RVIC~S COMMZTT~ DIST CURRENT MEMBER *6 *7 2 4 Pat Muro Diana Briggs Kevin Miller Sandy Kristoferson Diane Ricks Peggy Norton Jim Kirkpatrick NOMINATION Fran Miller Carol Brantley Charles Saunders 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Miller 1994-96 Krueger 1994-96 Brock 1994-96 Miller 1994-96 Krueger 1994-96 Cott K~EP D~NTON BEAUTIFUL BOARD D~ST cumam~ MEMBER '1 *6 *7 *3 4 2 Mabel Devereaux Gayla Robles Vera Laney Fjola Jeffries Bill Watson Robert Gentile (resignation) NOMINATION Larry Mullen Gayla Robles Vera Laney Fjola Jeffries Mark Osborne TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Young 1994-96 Brock 1994-96 Miller 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Cott 1995-97 Krueger * No * Individual nominated and approved Individual nominated but not approved No nomination DIST *7 *3 *4 Kjell Johansen Kathy Pole Ema Ruth Russell NOMINATION Kjell Johansen Kathy Pole Ema Ruth Russell 487 Ag~,n~a No, -:'" ~ ~--~" · ("r.~- ~... / ,~genda Item h- -~ ~ ". TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Miller 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Cott PARKS AND RECP~ATION BOAED DIST CURRENT MEMBER *7 Tom Judd *2 Loyce Wilson Annie Burroughs Tom Reece TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Miller 1994-96 Krueger PLANNIN~AND ZONING CO~IBSION DIST CURRENT~E~ *3 *5 *6 Mike Cochran Ellen Schertz Katie Flemming Carol Ann Ganzer Ellen Schertz Mike Cochran TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Beasley 1994-96 Brock PLUMBING AND M~C~NI~AL COD~ BOAED DIST CURRENT MEMBER *5 *6 1 Millard Heath (Mechanical Contractor) Lee Capps (Layman) (Jeff Peploe) (Master plumber) PUBLIC OTILITIEB BOAED DIST CURRENT~ER Millard Heath Lee Capps NOMINATION TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Beasley 1994-96 Brock 1994-96 Young TERM COUNCIL *5 Bill Giese Bill Giese 1992-96 Beasley * No * Individual nominated and approved Individual nominated but not approved No nomination SI~N BOARD OF APPEALS DIST CURRENT MEMBER *1 Spencer Washington 3 Ann Houston (ALT) *7 Mike Wiebe NOMINATION Slick Smith Mike Wiebe Agenda Item ~ ~ Date~- ,' ~_ .... ~ ~ TERM CQUNCIL 1994-96 Young 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Miller TRAFFIC SAPETY COMMISSION 'DIST CURRENT MEMBER *6 1 *2 3 *4 Greg Sawko Kathy Devine Derrick Hartsfield Mark Coomes Larry Luce Greg Sawko Fred Hill Derrick Hartsfield Larry Luce TERM COUNCIL 1994-96 Brock 1994-96 Young 1994-96 Krueger 1994-96 Biles 1994-96 Cott CIVIL S~VICI CO~ISSION *2 Dennis Stephens DENTON HOUSING AI]THORZTY $ AT CURRENT MEMBER Dennis Stephens NOMINATION TERM 1993-96 TERM City Mgr. · 1 Tony Soto Tony Soto · 2 Bob Crouch Bob Crouch 1994-96 Mayor 1994-96 Mayor BOARD OF DIaZCT SEAT CURRENT MEMBER *0 Tom Harpool ACC00128 NOMINATION George Hopkins TERM 1994-96 Council * No * Individual nominated and approved Individual nominated but not approved No nomination