Loading...
Minutes January 19,1999CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES January 19, 1999 After determining that a quorum was present and convening in an open meeting, the City Council convened in a Closed Meeting on Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 5:15 p.m. in the Council Work Session Room at City Hall. PRESENT: Mayor Miller; Mayor Pro Tem Beasley; Council Members Burroughs, Cochran, Durrance, and Kristoferson. ABSENT: Council Member Young 1. Closed Meeting: A. Conference with Employees – Under TEX. GOV’T. CODE Sec. 551.075. The Council received information from employees during a staff conference or briefing, but did not deliberate during the conference. Regular Meeting of the City of Denton City Council on Tuesday, January 19, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. PRESENT: Mayor Miller; Mayor Pro Tem Beasley; Council Members Burroughs, Cochran, Durrance, and Kristoferson. ABSENT: Council Member Young 1. Pledge of Allegiance The Council and members of the audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance to the U. S. and Texas flags. 2. The Council considered approval of the minutes of October 20 and October 21, 1998. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”,Kristoferson “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. CITIZEN REPORTS 3. The Council received a report from Willie Hudspeth regarding the drainage easement at 623 Newton. Mr. Hudspeth was not present at the meeting. CONSENT AGENDA Burroughs motioned, Durrance seconded to approve the Consent Agenda and the accompanying ordinances. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”, Kristoferson “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. City of Denton City Council Minutes January 19, 1999 Page 2 4. NO. 99-017 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF A STEEL PLATFORM TRUCK SCALE; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (BID #2312 – STEEL PLATFORM TRUCK SCALES AWARDED TO FAIRBANKS SCALES IN THE AMOUNT OF $52,974) 5. NO. 99-018 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF FLEET VEHICLES; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (BID #2310 – FLEET VEHICLES AWARDED AS LISTED IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $518,242) 6. NO. 99-019 AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF UTILITY TRACTORS; PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (BID #2328 – UTILITY TRACTORS AWARDED TO LAWN LAND OF DENTON IN THE AMOUNT OF $60,741) PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. The Council held a public hearing and considered approval of a resolution adopting the Denton Plan Growth Management Strategy. Dave Hill, Director of Planning and Development, stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission had reservations regarding this resolution. It did not go as far as the Commission would have liked it to go on several fronts. Hill indicated that this was a stepping stone to the Comprehensive Plan. In that context, the Planning and Zoning Commission was willing to approve the resolution for Council consideration. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Steve Kniatt stated that a survey was conducted that indicated that a balance between new homes and businesses should be achieved. He reviewed the results of the survey regarding growth and businesses. He felt Council should review the results of that survey before considering the resolution. Everything in the plan was already in the City Charter and there really was no need for this proposed document. Ed Soph stated that he had a question regarding the proposal. He was concerned with recycling and felt the City needed to institute a recycling center. City of Denton City Council Minutes January 19, 1999 Page 3 Mayor Miller stated that there was a plan to institute such a center in this budget year. Also there was an environmental task force working on this issue and a city department working on this. Aaron Thomas stated that he supported the plan but had a concern about the figures for new homes being built in the area, as the supply for materials was very limited at this point in time. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Beasley motioned to approve the resolution. She stated that this had been a long process and was the second step in the process for the Comprehensive Plan. The final step would be that the Plan would indicate where areas of different types of development could occur. Cochran seconded the motion. He stated that growth was the major issue in the city at this point in time. There needed to be a logical and methodical manner to manage growth. Council Member Durrance stated that this document had been discussed at public meetings and changes were made to the document due to public comments made at those meetings. This was a management strategy for the future of the City. The following resolution was considered: NO. R99-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ADOPTING THE DENTON PLAN GROWTH MANAGETMENT STRATEGY AS A MAJOR COMPONENT OF THE CITY OF DENTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”,Kristoferson “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. 8. The Council held a public hearing regarding the proposed annexation of a 114.76 acre property located on the north side of Hickory Creek Road, northwest of McNair Elementary School in Denton’s extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Dave Hill, Director of Planning and Development, stated that there was an approved annexation schedule in the agenda materials. This was the second public hearing with the Council with no th formal action required at this meeting. A special called meeting of Council would be February 9 for the first reading of the annexation ordinance. Urban services were available for the developer on the site. There would be a slightly higher monthly charge for being outside the city. A service analysis by the DISD was removed from the Council information packet at the request of the DISD. A new service plan was presented with an analysis of potential impact and indicated that the annexation would have a limited impact on the DISD as the property was already in the DISD boundaries. Regardless of the potential density, the property was already in the DISD and had urban services. A concept plan was provided for informational purposes. The developer was proposing 6,000 and 7,000 square foot lots with a collector street to be installed. A bridge would have to be built for crossing in the Hickory Creek Road area. City of Denton City Council Minutes January 19, 1999 Page 4 Council Member Kristoferson stated that services could not be denied. If the property were not annexed, density could not be controlled. It was her assumption that the annexation and zoning would be considered together. She did not realize that they were two separate issues. She questioned what could be done about that. Hill stated that if Council felt that the density was inappropriate, the Council could not vote for the annexation and zoning and ask the applicant what he might do should annexation be denied. There may instances where it would be in the best interest of the City to annex the property as agriculture. City Attorney Prouty stated that if the desire was maximum control on this development, it had to be within the city limits. Part of the growth management strategy was an aggressive annexation policy. If Council did not feel that the zoning was appropriate, the property would not be annexed. Mayor Pro Tem Beasley stated that improvements such as a bridge and road would not have to be done if the property were not annexed. Hill stated that they would have to be done per the subdivision regulations. Under the subdivision regulations, the City could only ask for outright dedication of the floodway. More was being offered by the developer in this case. The average density of the proposal was approximately 2.4- 2.5 units to the acre. After replatting, the Oaks of Montecito was 3.1 units to the acre. Council Member Cochran asked if the Council could only annex the property without the zoning. Hill stated that the petitioner had the option to combine the annexation with a zoning request so that the property would be annexed with straight zoning rather than the default zoning of agriculture. If the case was that it was the petitioner’s discretion whether the two were combined or not, he was not sure that the Council had the authority to break them out and only approve the annexation without the zoning. City Attorney Prouty stated that there was no written policy regarding such a case. In the past the annexation was usually combined with the zoning requested. However, if the zoning were not provided, the land would remain agricultural until another designation was done. He felt the question was if the Council did not provide the type of zoning the developer requested the developer could withdraw the request for annexation. Usually, although it was not an established policy, the developer would be allowed to withdraw the application. Council Member Durrance stated that he understood that zoning and annexation were two separate issues and the vote for annexation required a supermajority vote as would withdrawal. He viewed those as two separate issues. The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the two issues together but took two votes. He asked for a clarification of the options available. City Attorney Prouty stated that it also appeared to him that the Planning and Zoning Commission took two votes on the separate issues of annexation and zoning. Usually both were done in the same ordinance. A supermajority vote would be required for both the annexation and zoning issues. Withdrawal was not a vote on the main issue and was just a vote on a policy issue that City of Denton City Council Minutes January 19, 1999 Page 5 only required a majority vote. Council Member Cochran stated that with his experience on the Planning and Zoning Commission, he had not handled both zoning and annexation with the same vote, as they were different issues. Mayor Miller requested a report from staff relative to the procedure for annexation and zoning as separate issues. The Mayor opened the public hearing. The following individuals spoke during the public hearing: Christine Rowell, 1300 Vista Verde, Denton, 76205 - opposition Steve Rowell, 1300 Vista Verde, Denton, 76205 - opposition Frank Rabold, 1301 Vista Verde, Denton, 76205 - opposition Dave Neal - 1101 Buena Vista, Denton, 76205 - neutral Bill Cheek, Jr. 1200 Vista Verde, Denton, 76205 - opposition Diane Klutz, 1102 Vista Verde, Denton, 76205 - opposition Robert Dee, 1201 Vista Verde, Denton, 76205 - opposition Steve Kniatt, 1003 Hopkins Drive, Denton, 76205 - opposition Steven Klutz 1102 Vista Verde, Denton, 76205 - opposition Jean Stanley, Vista Verde, Denton, 76205 - opposition Tary Arterburn, 3100 McKimmon Ste. 905, Dallas, 75201 - favor Cary Cobb, 1401 Burnham, Plano - favor Mayor Miller stated the following individuals had turned in Speaker Cards: Lance Folse, 1501 Vista Verde, Denton, 76205 - opposition Carolene Folse, 1501 Vista Verde, Denton, 76205 - opposition Kirk Williams, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 5400, Dallas, 75270 - favor The Mayor closed the public hearing. 9. The Council held a public hearing and considered the request to rezone 1.501 acres from a Planned Development (PD-6) zoning district to an Office (O) zoning district. The 1.501 acre property was legally described as all of tract 8 (.344 acres) and part of tract 7 (1.157) in the R. H. Hopkins Survey, Abstract 1694 and was located on the north side of San Jacinto Blvd., approximately 316 feet east of Piney Creek Blvd. The proposal was for future resale and development. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0) with conditions.) (Z-98-046) Dave Hill, Director of Planning and Development, stated that this request was for a straight zoning district of 1.501 acres. There was no specific development proposed at this point in time. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval with the conditions of (1) lighting be designed and maintained to not shine on adjoining property and no night sky diffusion, and (2) a bufferyard of 15' with canopy trees every 20' and 1.5” under-story trees for every canopy tree City of Denton City Council Minutes January 19, 1999 Page 6 along the northern boundary between the single family adjacent subdivision and the site. The parcel was located on San Jacinto Blvd. The property was not platted and would have to be prior to development. Curb cut and sidewalks would be required should development occur. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Ray Cox represented the applicant for the case. They had completed a design for a medical office park. The building would have an all masonry exterior with parking in back of the building. There were immediate plans for construction upon approval of zoning and the detailed plan. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 99-020 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE FROM A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION TO OFFICE CONDITIONED (O[c]) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION FOR A PORTION OF PLANNED DEVLEOPMENT NO. 6 (PD-6) BEING 1.501 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SAN JACINTO BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY 316 FEET EAST OF PINEY CREEK BLVD.; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Kristoferson motioned, Cochran seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”,Kristoferson “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. 19. The Council held a public hearing and considered a rezoning of 3.24 acres to change the maximum square footage allowed in the existing Planned Development (PD-6) zoning district. The 3.24 acre property is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1 of the Golden Triangle/Michael’s Addition in the City of Denton, Denton County, Texas and was located on the east side of Colorado Blvd., approximately 525 feet north of Loop 288. The proposal was to reflect the actual development of the Hastings and Michael’s stores that had occurred on the property and provide for some future expansion. (The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (7-0) with one condition.) (Z-98-057) Dave Hill, Director of Planning and Development, stated that the request was to rezone the property to change the maximum square footage allowed in the existing PD 6 zoning. The developer requested that the actual square footage that had been developed for the Hastings and Michael’s stores be acknowledge and to add additional square footage for future expansion. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval with one condition. He reviewed the history of the development of the area as noted in the agenda materials. The proposal was to reflect the actual development of the Hastings and Michael’s stores that had occurred on the property and to provide for some future expansion. City of Denton City Council Minutes January 19, 1999 Page 7 Council Member Cochran expressed concern with the parking in the area. It appeared that there was not enough parking in the area. Hill stated that there had to be one parking space for every 200 feet of retail space and one space for every 100 feet of restaurant space that was within the requirements of the zoning code. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Kirk Williams, representing the current property owner, stated that the discrepancy was discovered when they had requested refinancing from the bank and discovered that the approved zoning did not match what was built. There were no plans to develop the additional portion of property. They were simply satisfying the requirements for their refinancing. Landscaping would be as currently was provided which did not meet the current requirements. There was no intent to develop the site. They were only doing a refinancing requirement. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 99-021 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS, AMENDING THE DETAIL PLAN FOR A PORTION OF PLANNED DEVLEOPMENT 6 (PD-6) ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND USE DESIGNATION BY INCREASING THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED IN THE EXISTING DETAIL PLAN, BEING 3.24 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLORADO BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY 525 FEET NORTH OF LOOP 288; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Council Member Cochran motioned to approve the request but with the stipulation that the amount of retail space be limited to 38,536 square feet which was the existing square footage. He felt that there were many problems with parking in the location with a number of poor spaces not known about in the back of the building. He asked if the developer would have any objections to such a motion. Williams stated that he would have no objections to such a motion. This was more of a cleanup of the paperwork on the property. Council Member Cochran amended his motion to allow for 39,000 square feet. Kristoferson seconded the motion. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”,Kristoferson “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION City of Denton City Council Minutes January 19, 1999 Page 8 11. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance approving a real estate contract between the City of Denton and John C. Johnson and Doris Bean Johnson, relating to the purchase of 0.029 acre of land for the expansion of U.S. Highway 77 (Parcel 54 & 55); authorizing the expenditure of funds therefore; and providing an effective date. (The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0.) The following ordinance was considered: NO. 99-022 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A REAL ESTATE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON AND JOHN C. JOHNSON AND DORIS BEAN JOHNSON, RELATING TO THE PURCHASE OF 0.029 ACRE OF LAND FOR THE EXPANSION OF U.S. HIGHWAY 77 (PARCEL 54 & 55); AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFORE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Beasley motioned, Cochran seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”,Kristoferson “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. 12. The Council considered approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the City of Corinth to mutually disannex and then proceed to annex certain property along the joint Denton and Corinth city boundary. Dave Hill, Director of Planning and Development, stated that this resolution would approve a Memorandum of Agreement with the City of Corinth to mutually disannex and then annex certain property along the joint Denton and Corinth city boundary. If approved, Denton would have to go through the annexation process by taking the land disannexed by Corinth and going through public hearings, zoning, etc. The following resolution was considered: NO. R99-004 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CORINTH TO MUTUALLY DISANNEX AND THEN PROCEED TO ANNEX CERTAIN PROPERTY ALONG THE JOINT DENTON AND CORINTH CITY BOUNDARY. Cochran motioned, Burroughs seconded to approve the resolution. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”,Kristoferson “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. 13. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance providing for the renaming of Willow Springs Drive to Teasley Lane from Dallas Drive to its northern terminus. (The Planning and City of Denton City Council Minutes January 19, 1999 Page 9 Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-1.) Dave Hill, Director of Planning and Development reviewed the history of the street names in the area as indicated in the agenda materials. Larry Bailey stated that the City had other roads with different street names as the street continued through the city. He felt there was a need for better signage in the area for Shady Oaks. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 99-023 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE RENAMING OF WILLOW SPRINGS DRIVE TO TEASLEY LANE FROM DALLAS DRIVE TO ITS NORTHERN TERMINUS. Burroughs motioned, Beasley seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”,Kristoferson “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. 14. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance on Second Reading whereby the City of Denton, Texas, grants to CoServ Gas a non-exclusive franchise to furnish, transport, sell and distribute gas to customers in Denton, Texas, for a period of ten (10) years for a franchise fee in the amount of 3% of revenues collected and providing definitions; providing a payment schedule and statement of revenues; providing franchise fee not in lieu of other fees and contract obligations; providing dependable gas supply at lowest reasonable costs; providing obligations regarding company facilities, long-range planning for capital improvement projects, City review of construction and design, requests by City for relocation of company facilities and work by others; providing for changing boundaries of City and abandonment; providing City not required to advance funds; providing for technological improvements; providing for compliance with City rules and regulations, Railroad Commission specifications and regulations, and environmental laws; providing office location, reports on company operations and activities and detailed bills; providing City held harmless and indemnification, notice to company, insurance and bonds; providing payment of expenses incurred by City in relation to ordinance; providing right of first purchase, right to purchase or condemn, limitations of company removal of facilities, transportation and procurement of gas by City and curtailment; providing civil penalties, foreclosure, forfeiture and termination and other legal remedies; providing no waiver, rights of successors and assigns, representatives and notices, severability, entire agreement, company approval, annexation to the City and third parties; providing compliance with City Charter and application of terms in competing franchises; and providing an effective date. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 99-024 AN ORDINANCE ON SECOND READING WHEREBY THE CITY OF DENTON, City of Denton City Council Minutes January 19, 1999 Page 10 TEXAS, GRANTS TO COSERV GAS A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO FURNISH, TRANSPORT, SELL AND DISTRIBUTE GAS TO CUSTOMERS IN DENTON, TEXAS, FOR A PERIOD OF TEN (10) YEARS FOR A FRANCHISE FEE IN THE AMOUNT OF 3% OF REVENUES COLLECTED AND PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING A PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND STATEMENT OF REVENUES; PROVIDING FRANCHISE FEE NOT IN LIEU OF OTHER FEES AND CONTRACT OBLIGATIONS; PROVIDING DEPENDABLE GAS SUPPLY AT LOWEST REASONABLE COSTS; PROVIDING OBLIGATIONS REGARDING COMPANY FACILITIES, LONG-RANGE PLANNING FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS, CITY REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN, REQUESTS BY CITY FOR RELOCATION OF COMPANY FACILITIES AND WORK BY OTHERS; PROVIDING FOR CHANGING BOUNDARIES OF CITY AND ABANDONMENT; PROVIDING CITY NOT REQUIRED TO ADVANCE FUNDS; PROVIDING FOR TECHNOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CITY RULES AND REGULATIONS, RAILROAD COMMISSION SPECIFICATIONS AND REGULATIONS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS; PROVIDING OFFICE LOCATION, REPORTS ON COMPANY OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES AND DETAILED BILLS; PROVIDING CITY HELD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION, NOTICE TO COMPANY, INSURANCE AND BONDS; PROVIDING PAYMENT OF EXPENSES INCURRED BY CITY IN RELATION TO ORDINANCE; PROVIDING RIGHT OF FIRST PURCHASE, RIGHT TO PURCHASE OR CONDEMN, LIMITATIONS OF COMPANY REMOVAL OF FACILITIES, TRANSPORTATION AND PROCUREMENT OF GAS BY CITY AND CURTAILMENT; PROVIDING CIVIL PENALTIES, FORECLOSURE, FORFEITURE AND TERMINATION AND OTHER LEGAL REMEDIES; PROVIDING NO WAIVER, RIGHTS OF SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, REPRESENTATIVES AND NOTICES, SEVERABILITY, ENTIRE AGREEMENT, COMPANY APPROVAL, ANNEXATION TO THE CITY AND THIRD PARTIES; PROVIDING COMPLIANCE WITH CITY CHARTER AND APPLICATION OF TERMS IN COMPETING FRANCHISES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Cochran motioned, Beasley seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”,Kristoferson “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. 15. The Council considered a motion to authorize the holding of a City Council meeting outside of City Hall. Cochran motioned, Burroughs seconded to approve holding a council meeting at the Radisson. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”,Kristoferson “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. 16. Miscellaneous matters from the City Manager. City Manager Jez did not have any items for Council. City of Denton City Council Minutes January 19, 1999 Page 11 17. New Business A. Council Member Durrance requested moving consideration of traffic impact fees up on the work session schedule. 18. There was no continuation of Closed Meeting under Sections 551-071–551.085 of the Texas Open Meetings Act. 19. There was no official Action on Closed Meeting items held under Section 551-071– 551.085 of the Texas Open Meetings Act. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. __________________________ JACK MILLER, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS ___________________________ JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS