Loading...
Minutes April 13, 1999 CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 13, 1999 After determining that a quorum was present and convening in an open meeting, the City Council convened in a closed meeting on Tuesday, April 13, 1999 at 5:15 p.m. in the Council Work Session Room at City Hall. PRESENT: Mayor Miller; Mayor Pro Tem Beasley; Council Members Burroughs, Cochran, Durrance, Kristoferson and Young. ABSENT: None 1. The Council considered the following in Closed Meeting: A. Consultation with Attorney – Under TEX. GOV’T. CODE Sec. 551.071. Discussed and consulted with the City’s attorney, including outside legal counsel, litigation styled City of Denton v. Denton County Fresh Water Supply District No. 1A and Denton County Fresh Water Supply District No. 5, Cause No. 99-40158- nd 362, filed in the 362 District Court of Denton County, Texas, including strategy and possible settlement negotiations. B. Conference with Employees – Under TEX. GOV’T. CODE Sec. 551.075. The Council received information from employees during a staff conference or briefing, but did not deliberate during the conference. The Council convened into a Work Session on Tuesday, April 13, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. in the Work Session Room at City Hall. PRESENT: Mayor Miller; Mayor Pro Tem Beasley; Council Members Burroughs, Cochran, Durrance, Kristoferson and Young. ABSENT: None 1. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding an Impact Fee Feasibility Study. The study addresses Transportation Impact Fees, Drainage Impact Fees, and Impact Fee Policy Options, and has been prepared by Duncan Associates of Austin, Texas. Jim Duncan stated that the scope of the study included the feasibility of implementing impact fees for roadway and drainage facilities. The report also identified various policy options for the design of “variable rate” fees. In the area of transportation fees, it was found that the needed facilities were ineligible for funding or would be funded by developers through the existing exaction process. A fee system would require nine service areas with wide fees and the fee system would require expensive modeling. Recommendations for a drainage impact fee were to consider a fee in the Hickory Creek watershed and consider a city-wide utility fee. Policy options included growth management policies that dealt with differential fees by service area and density-adjusted fees for water/wastewater lines. Housing affordability, another policy option, dealt with size of housing unit, size of residential lot, number of water fixtures, and number of garages. Regional competitiveness was a third policy option. A recommendation from the study indicated that the City needed to decide whether it was more important to keep fees as low as possible or to recover growth-related costs in order to fund line extensions needed to preserve its service area. The agenda materials included a detailed analysis of the study’s recommendations. City of Denton City Council Minutes April 13, 1999 Page 2 Council Member Cochran stated that he was opposed to a utility fee that required a monthly charge on existing customers as it was a regressive form of taxation. Council Member Burroughs asked if a drainage impact fee were implemented, would it have an effect on an exaction fee. Duncan replied yes as both could not be done if it were an off-site improvement. Mayor Miller felt there was no need to change policies at this point in time. Martin stated that there would be more data available after completion of the comprehensive plan. Council Member Kristoferson felt there would be a need to return to this issue at a later date. Council Member Durrance felt there was a need to proceed with transportation impact fees. He was concerned about assumptions that were unsupported at this point in time. Those already here should not be taxed but rather it should be the responsibility of those newly affecting the systems. Consensus of Council was to revisit the issues at a later date. 2. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding the Parks, Recreation & Open Space; Urban Design, “The Street” and “The Edge” sections of the Draft Comprehensive Plan. Ed Hodney, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that the basis for the recommendations and strategies were an analysis adopted local standards. Goals and strategies included distribution of parks with a goal to ensure the adequate and equitable distribution of parks, open space and recreation facilities. Other goals and objectives included park and open space acquisition, financial effectiveness, and responsiveness. Details on these goals and objectives were included in the agenda materials. Jerry Clark, City Engineer, reviewed the “Street” section of the proposed comprehensive plan. Specific goals and objectives with recommendations were included in the agenda materials. Dave Hill, Director of Planning and Development, reviewed the Urban design section as found in the back-up materials. He also reviewed the “Edge” section of the plan that was detailed in the agenda materials. 3. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding the annexation of 65.174 acres located on the south side of Nowlin Road on the east side of FM 2181 (Teasley Lane) generally opposite Hickory Creek Road in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Denton, Texas. The proposal is to develop the property for commercial (C) zoning district, multi-family residential (MF-2) zoning district and single-family residential (SF-7) zoning district. City of Denton City Council Minutes April 13, 1999 Page 3 Dave Hill, Director of Planning and Development, stated that this was a voluntary annexation. Staff was requesting Council direction on whether or not to proceed with this annexation process. Council Member Kristoferson questioned whether to split the annexation with the zoning request. City Attorney Prouty stated that the annexation was split from the zoning during the first reading of the annexation ordinance. Final action of the zoning would have to take place following the second reading of the annexation. Consensus of the Council was to split the annexation from the zoning request. 4. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave direction to staff with regard to the possible annexation of three tracts of land: A. Trinity Meadows – approximately 80.7 acres south of McKinney Street (FM 426) near its intersection with Trinity Road. A manufactured housing development was proposed. B. Mesquite Meadows – approximately 100.2 acres north of Loop 288, between Stuart and N. Locust Streets. Subdivision into two large lots was proposed. No specific development proposal had been stated. C. Lubbers Addition – approximately 19 acres south of Edwards Road between Mayhill Road and Swisher Road. A manufactured housing development was proposed. Dave Hill, Director of Planning and Development, stated that Council had given permission to begin the annexation of Trinity Meadows and Mesquite Meadows. He was confirming that Council wanted to keep on schedule with the involuntary annexation. The developers were all expressing interest in platting and staff was not certain that involuntary annexation would allow annexation in place prior to subdivision improvements. Staff was recommending annexation at this point in time. Consensus of the Council was to proceed. 5. The Council received an update and gave staff direction concerning the establishment of regulations regarding the installation of surface irrigation systems and drinking water wells within the City of Denton. This item was not considered. 6. The Council received a report, held a discussion and gave staff direction regarding the appointment of a special Citizen’s Advisory Committee to study capital improvement needs and make a recommendation for projects to include in a January 2000 bond election. City of Denton City Council Minutes April 13, 1999 Page 4 Rick Svehla, Deputy City Manager, stated that with the last committee in 1995, each member appointed 7 members to the committee with the entire Council appointing the chair. Staff was recommending that same procedure. The existing 1995 committee also recommended a carry- over committee for future watching of the bond projects. Consensus of Council was to proceed with the schedule and procedure as outlined in the back-up materials. Following the completion of the Work Session the Council convened into a Special Called Session. 1. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 99-057, as amended, ordering an election to be held on May 1, 1999 and the amending ordinances, for the purpose of submitting to the registered voters of Denton, Texas amendments to the Denton City Charter by amending Amendment No. 25 and Proposition No. 16 to clarify that the amendment refers to City officers and employees; to amend Proposition No. 5 to make a minor change in wording; ratifying previous actions of employees; providing a severability clause; providing a savings clause; providing an Open Meetings clause; and providing an effective date. The following ordinance was considered: NO. 99-133 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 99-057, AS AMENDED, ORDERING AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MAY 1, 1999 AND THE AMENDING ORDINANCES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING TO THE REGISTERED VOTERS OF DENTON, TEXAS AMENDMENTS TO THE DENTON CITY CHARTER BY AMENDING AMENDMENT NO. 25 AND PROPOSITION NO. 16 TO CLARIFY THAT THE AMENDMENT REFERS TO CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; TO AMEND PROPOSITION NO. 5 TO MAKE A MINOR CHANGE IN WORDING; RATIFYING PREVIOUS ACTIONS OF EMPLOYEES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN OPEN MEETINGS CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Kristoferson motioned, Beasley seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”, Kristoferson “aye”, Young “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. 2. The Council considered adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas authorizing the City Manager to execute confidentiality agreements between the City and potential bidders or acquirers participating in the divestiture process respecting the City’s electric system assets; and providing an effective date. The following ordinance was considered: City of Denton City Council Minutes April 13, 1999 Page 5 NO. 99-134 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY AND POTENTIAL BIDDERS OR ACQUIRERS PARTICIPATING IN THE DIVESTITURE PROCESS RESPECTING THE CITY’S ELECTRIC SYSTEM ASSETS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Beasley motioned, Burroughs seconded to adopt the ordinance. On roll vote, Beasley “aye”, Burroughs “aye”, Cochran “aye”, Durrance “aye”, Kristoferson “aye”, Young “aye”, and Mayor Miller “aye”. Motion carried unanimously. 3. There was no official action on Closed Meeting items held under Section 551-071–551.085 of the Texas Open Meetings Act. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m. _______________________ JACK MILLER, MAYOR CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS __________________________ JENNIFER WALTERS CITY SECRETARY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS