Mapping Issues 010902MAPPING ISSUES
Oak Street
to
Comment Oak Street at
Williams
Oak Street
and
Carroll Blvd
has been a
for many years
like to be
a historical
lawyers'
Request change
NRMU-12.
would like to have a
that would allow
like to have a
classification that
Blvd should be
along
gth
of the Although NRMU- 12
within this is consistent with the
are currently
MF-1 or 2F.
was placed
uest of the City
The
~osed NR-3 is a
in
· over
existing zoning and
existing conditions.
change per
Council policy.
Change to NRMU-12
opposed
Council Although NRMU- 12
this is consistent with the
to NR-3 to existing zoning and
existing existing conditions.
The change per
Iosed NR-3 is a Council policy.
in
· over
action
z Council zoned Although NRMU-12
property to NR-3 is consistent with the
.g existing zoning and
The existing conditions.
Iosed NR-3 is a change per
in Council policy.
· over
Change to NRMU
g is 2F. Change per
NR-3 is Council policy
reduction in
z but
change to the map
land use.
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
MAPPING ISSUES
SF-16 area
on Hinkle
2309 Hinkle
request that this
'be rezoned to
like this
match the
South Zoning
Staff recommends Change per
property to Council policy
as NR-4.
is a
in
z over
SF-16.
between two
of NRMU-12.
Staff recommends
to NRMU-12. north and south. No
would be an change per Council
of intensity.
~atible to
change to map
Although NRMU-12 Change to NRMU-12
is compatible to
adjacent zoning to the
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
MAPPING ISSUES
Sherman
north
of Piggly
Wiggly
currently has
zoning would like
· to be
be able to
) it.
consensus
keep the
as NR-3 as it
up to single
to the north.
Change per
Council policy
Change to NRMU
the frontage on
Sherman Drive now
zoning
property owner
that NRMU
more uses
GR.
Staff recommends
limitation on
(10 acres) in
an SLIP be
on multi-
development
NRMU district
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
MAPPING ISSUES
Comment Brae
Comment Brae
North
uests NCR 12 to
zoning
for adjoining
' and to be more
with the
Our
' has been placed
NR3 by error. Does
anyone
purposely singled
our property for
owners. If
change is not made
will have to seek
through a
costly processed
required of
landowners.
for equity.
development Change to NRMU-12
.g that north is
line with developed at
property to the approximately 6 units
(NCR- 12). The acre currently
surrounding mapped as NR-3, but
property would
for it to develop
single family.
z zoned
A) the
was designated
a possible location
neighborhood
densities
towards
north from
z Drive.
is an increase
31,57,71,
71,107, 116&117
opposed tothe
uest.
code, would Staff does not
to have NCMU this
NCR-2 is
should be put to a g
vote.
has been revised to
as a mapping
error. The requested
zoning
existing uses
north and
south. Prior to
combining the NR
and NCR districts,
would have been
a 2-step increase
(Category D), and
recommended by
staff, however, the
request now
constitutes a
significant increase
no change
Council policy.
Change per
Council policy
change
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
MAPPING ISSUES
McKinney
at Glengary
Way
like the frontage
be similar to be NR-3
the subdivision.
opposed to
on these
are
about use
They
have
family. Currem
zoning allows for
use only.
Site design standards
any MF/
be
design.
NRMU
is an
of intensity
MF and
:PI)
Staff
that a
on lot size
(,10 acres) in addition
SUP be placed
Change per
Council Policy
change
38O
east
district (L(4).
is curremly Council
GR and have had
inquiries to it. This
uest that it be is currently
NCMU GR. NCR-2
imensity
Although NRMU is
consistent with the
existing zoning and
existing conditions.
change per
Council policy
Change to NRMU
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
MAPPING ISSUES
38O
east
Comment
Comment 288 ~
Audra
Comment Stuart at
288
are opposed to
zoning.
owner would
to keep the NCR-12.
uest to develop area
low to moderate
families. The
density of
wouldn't allow for
tgh lot sizes
request
be more
with the
like this to be
Would
like to see multi-
' homes in that
Also south of
and would like to
as a
of that area.
/ like the comers to
NRMU.
~ is currently
zoned
surrounded on
sides by
> Rd and US
380. This is an
Although NRMU- 12
is an increase over
existing zoning,
downzoning at this
be a
significant decrease.
Change per
Council policy.
Change to NR2
uest of NRMU- 12
is an increase in
to the
combination of the
would have been
a small increase that
staff could not
support. No Change
Council policy.
change
zoning
existing PD.
zoning would
a significant
in intensity
existing and
~g.
Change per
Council policy.
90 degrees for
designation
and SE
are currently
GR. Proposed
is a reduction
intensity on the NE
per previous
action.
Although this is a
significant increase,
staff recommends the
to be
in the NRMU
district to be
consistent with
existing zoning. No
Change per Council
Change to NRMU
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
MAPPING ISSUES
New Wilson
Comment Street
Comment The Lakes
of Sundown
property is a
land.
~will be
I protest to
changes.
owner would
to property to be
RCC-D NRMU- 12
NR-2 and NR-4
26 currently
LI uses
Change per
Council policy
change
A
Plan
uired for
is the highest
category
NR-3 is a
of
'from the
request is a Change per
increase of Council policy
over the
PD.
changes as
uested
of
Argyle
1-
35
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
is on US 377 U377 to combining
like zoning of tuested to districts this
allow for retail. Council a
reduce the small increase that
from NCR-12 staff could not
NCR-4 is support. No Change
of Council policy
z over
zoning.
should be zoned SF-7 should Change per
NRMU to allow multi- been classified Council policy
per the existing NR-4. Proximity
existing MF-1
an
NRMU-
12
Change to NRMU-12
change
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
MAPPING ISSUES
South of
and Loop
288
Comment 1-35E at
Rd
Comment 1619
Amherst
Comment 8.98 Acres
West
like some
as to the
of
Community
and
Centers.
like this tract to
RCC-D.
that allows
CM-G
request that this
'be entirely
CM-G.
area is currently
the P&Z for an
to
Comprehensive
Staff
no
Change per
Council Policy
action
is outside Change per
~g area Council policy
Only the
of this parcel
is inside the City
Staff
no
Any change
Plan
action
zoning Change per
duplex Council policy.
would
uire a
Plan
action
split zoned
is within two
districts in the
Plan.
split zoning
platting
which will
development.
Change per
Council policy.
action
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
MAPPING ISSUES
Comment (Elm)
Windsor
Comment
Comment Sherman
288
a
a use on
Request to
CM-G
the zoning
' would like it to
zoned as Employment
Commercial (EC-
Questions why the
would want to be in
of underground
an equitable
of CM-G
the
is the highest
area.
Change per
Council policy.
action
operation
is currently a legal
tuire a
Plan
Change per
Council policy.
action
of CM-G
Plan
Change per
Council policy.
action
Comment
~ Mingo
Comment Geesling ~
38O
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
like to put mini-
on this property
to the railroad.
is an
of
The
uest to change to
Change per
Council policy.
action
1C-E, EC-
on frontage of
380 should also be
IC-E.
allow mini-
require
Comprehensive
Amendment.
Staff recommends This is one of ten
zonin Comprehensive Plan
uniform across the changes currently
of the proposed. Staff
and P&Z recommend
change.
Completed
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
MAPPING ISSUES
Street at
Taliaferro
Comment
~ Mingo
Comment Teasley
South
new zoning only
confuse an area
mixed use
This area
remain
and not
uses.
like to put mini-
on this property
to the railroad.
acent to US Corp of
property and
IC-E property. Propose
IC-E for this area.
Change per
to staff Council policy.
area should
examined at a
date as a small
plan to address
issues
different land
action
is an Change per
Council policy.
of
The
uest to change to
allow mini-
require
Comprehensive
Amendment.
action
is compatible
zoning.
[C-E would be an
intensity
require a
Plan
Change per
Council policy
action
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
10
MAPPING ISSUES
Comment
Comment
Comment Teasley
Comment 1-35 E just
east of
Teasley
intersection
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
reconsider the
to make this area a
District".
oppose this plan
decrease the
of my property.
how
be
loss
value in our
if this
is put into
: from
is a large increase of
This is one of ten
Comprehensive Plan
changes currently
proposed. P&Z
recommends this area
remain as a
Center.
Completed
[g is ,~ from
and should
available to be built
housing.
request moving is a large increase of
Centers
best use of this land uest
be a Community a
Center as the
Center
exclude larger
stores and larger
stores.
expand the
' to the east we
need that small
zoned properly, adjacent site.
consider the
corner to be
CM-G or at
including the
this site.
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
11
This is one of ten
Comprehensive Plan
changes currently
proposed. P&Z
recommends this area
remain as a
Center.
Completed
Plan
Change per
Council policy.
action
allows for a Change per
but not the Council policy.
action
MAPPING ISSUES
Comment Brae
South
Comment Worth
North
at
does not make
for this area. The
has the amenities
services for this
develop at a
has utilities to
This should be a sin
It is not divisible
an RD-5 Zoning.
preclude new
to lease space
the existing
Would request
EC-C type of zoning
this area.
IC-E like the property
be IC-E
is a decrease
intensity of
One of ten areas
currently being
considered for a
Comprehensive Plan
amendment. P&Z
recommends Rural
classification.
Completed
is a decrease Change per
existing Council policy.
in
Commercial
Special
action
uested EC-C
Plan
an increase Change per
existing use, but Council policy.
minimal decrease in
z from LI.
action
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
12
MAPPING ISSUES
Comment
Offices
that this
'is currently
and should be
equal zoning category.
use is LI.
Council Although previous
Council downzoned
Comprehensive Plan,
Ranch proposed request
The proposed is consistent with
i as it stands existing zoning and
would be a Comprehensive
in intensity, designation.
This change has been
made to EC-I on this
action
this site zoned
like to request
this property be is a decrease in
NRMU to z over
allow proposed Requested
of office is compatibk
This change has been
made to NRMU.
action - kept at
Comment South East
1. All churches should be 1. Churches are
same. every
Underlying
Housing on Ruddell should be
not be NRMU-12
designation is a
mapping error.
to NR-4 to
consistent with the
existing SF-7
zoning..
This change has been
2. Proposed NRMU- made to NR-4.
12 is an increase in
z over
SF-7 zoning.
action - kept at
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
13
MAPPING ISSUES
Comment
Crossing
CM-G. In
with
RCC-D would
appropriate.
would be This change has been
made to RCC-D.
LI zoning
allow
- kept at RCC-D
Comment of
Argyle Area
of the north phase
Hills of Argyle
like this to be
lesser zoning
Worried about
of his
should be zoned
NRMU to allow multi-
per the existing
z zoned MF-1 I
phase 3 This change has been
of Argyle made to the new
district of NR- 1.
to match the
Council Although pervious
this Council decreased
from NCR-12 zoning, staff
NRMU to NR-3. recommends a
is a decrease in designation.
z from This change has been
MF-1 zoning, made to NRMU.
action - kept at
of the proposed
of Trinity south side of
through the City's NCMU is
Plan would like in
request the section
proposed for Planned
to be NCMU. 121
concerned that the in
areas would take 1986. Proposed NCR-
' without is a decrease in
action - kept at
Staff recommends
change.
Change to NRMU
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
14
MAPPING ISSUES
Comment
uest that NCR-12 be
on Sites "C" and
and NCR-4 on Site
would be an Staff recommends
intensity, change.
Change per staff
uest
Comment Oakmont
Comment
Comment Avenue A
the the
~g is
in opposition to the to the PD, and
but feels that the majority is built
Developments PD could be
PD 111 and PD to the ones
12 that are not fully preserved.
PDs in the
they were
approved with.
to this property 99 was approved
is unacceptable and 1986 with a
with the PD of MF and
The ESA places SF with overall 6.4
on
(6
Der acre) is a
decrease in
Staff recommends as PD 111
lll&PD 12 .PD12
placed into the PD
reserved category.
zoned DR-1 would be an
like to put in intensity,
z units akin to surroundin
area under and zoning
Request DR-2 the increase.
district.
Staff recommends no Consensus was to
change, at NR-6 - no
Staff supports DR-2
in
consideration for DR-
2 for adjacent
to the east to
z the street block.
Change to DR-2
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
15
MAPPING ISSUES
change
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
16
ATTACHMENT 2 MAPPING ISSUES ADDENDUM JANUARY 9, 2002
Comment
up to existing
Request to be NRMU-12 family
1307 NR-3 akin to zoning areas on the west
Haggard Ln Hinkle Dr
Change per change to map
Council Policy
Comment
SE Comer
of Country
Club and
Ryan
Request for a
Neighborhood Center
with NRMU-NRMU- 12/
NCR-4 and NCR-6
uested
would
an increase
intensity
Change per change to map
Council Policy
122-124
Comment
Daughtery
Addressed 3620 N Elm
DC-G
Change to a district
which would allow
warehouses.
zoning category
to allow
a
plan
The
warehouse
will be legally
under the
exception
Change per action
Council Policy.
surrounding
a
uest to move to NR-6 of single
for higher density and duplex
S.
Staff recommends no Change to NR-6
change
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Correclions. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
17
ATTACHMENT 2 MAPPING ISSUES ADDENDUM JANUARY 9, 2002
Eagle Drive
New at Carroll
Blvd
Mulkey
Comment Drive at
Lattamore
DR-1 Change this property to
DC-N
Change this property to
NR-6 to allow duplexes
is a minor
As a major Change to DC-N
intersection staff up to
supports an increase Drive
in intensity and
the entire area
of DR- 1 on the block
area is currently Change was made to Completed
for
NR-4 does
allow duplexes.
is a corrective
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpo/icy)
C = Justified Correclions. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpo/icy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (m,xxirnum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
18
ATTACHMENT 3 MAPPING ISSUES ADDENDUM JANUARY 15, 2002
Previous
addressed as
Comp. Plan
Amendment
Edwards NR-2 and
NR-4 and NR-6
Road NR-4
New Comment
SE comer
University
and
Nottingham
NE comer
New Corbin and
1-35W
A higher density
adjacent to Andrew
Corp. would provide
lower
density residential.
Andrew Corp. has
opposed
residential
development adjacent
their property.
Same comment as
item # 29.
access to site need to
prior to
intense development.
Staff recommends
designation
by Council
)1-09-02.
at this
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Correclions. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (m,xximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
19
ATTACHMENT 3 MAPPING ISSUES ADDENDUM JANUARY 15, 2002
SW corner
Loop 288 NR-6 and
New and
Sherman NR- 12
Drive
North of
Windsor
New
West of
Bonnie Brae
810
New
Anderson
NRMU
The Applicant is
requesting the
rezoning of
approximately 25
acres along Loop 288
commercial
development.
expand the intensity
of the Community
Center
already designated at
intersection.
Although more
intense development
on Bonnie Brea in
likely, the
gnation
may be too intense
given the proximity
North Latkes Park
and SF development
the west.
Applicant wants to
Although the
surrounding zoning is
2F the use is SF.
gtaff recommends
at this
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Correclions. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (m,xxirnum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
20
ATTACHMENT 3 MAPPING ISSUES ADDENDUM JANUARY 15, 2002
A = Significant increase or decrease in zoning. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
C = Justified Corrections. (Change)
B = Zoning change that necessitates Comprehensive Plan amendment. (No Change per Councilpolicy)
D = Small increase or decrease in zoning (maximum of a two district jump)., (Consider Change)
21