1996-017 ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TE~S AND THE TE~S WATER
DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING, AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS
SECTION I That the City Manager Ks hereby authorzzed to
enter znto an agreement between the Czty of Denton, Texas and the
Texas Water Development Board for flood protection plannzng
SECTION II. That thzs ordinance shall become effectzve
mmmed~lately upon zts passage and approval ~
PASSED AND APPROVED this the /~ day of~, 1996
·
ATTEST
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
AP ED TO LEGAL FORM
HERBERT L PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY
STATE OF TEXAS TWDB Contract No 96-483-157
COUNTY OF TRAVIS Research and Planmng Fund
Flood Protection Planmng
THIS CONTRACT, (hereinafter "CONTRACT"), between the Texas Water Development
Board (hereinafter "BOARD") and the C~ty of Denton (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR(S)"), ~s
composed of two parts, Section I Specific conditions and excephons to the standard agreement
and Section II Standard Agreement The terms and conditions set forth ~n Section I w~ll take
precedence over terms and conditions ~n Section II
SECTION I SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS
TO STANDARD AGREEMENT
ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS For the purposes of th~s Contract, the following terms or phrases
shall have the meaning ascnbed therewith
A BOARD - The Texas Water Development Board, or ~ts demgnated representative
B CONTRACTOR(S) - C~ty of Denton
C EXECUTIVE ADMII~IISTRATOR - The Executive Administrator of the Board or h~$
demgnated representative
D PARTICIPANT(S) - None
E REQUIRED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT(S) - None
F BOARD APPROVAL DATE - October 19, 1995
G PLANNING AREA - The C~ty of Denton which contains the Cooper Creek
watershed and the Pecan Creek Tnbutary PEC-4 watershed
H DEADLINE FOR CONTRACT EXECUTION - January 18, 1996
CONTRACT INITIATION DATE - October 19, 1995
J STUDY COMPLETION DATE - September 30, 1996
K FINAL REPORT DEADLINE - November 30, 1996
L TOTAL STUDY COSTS - $97,980
M BOARD SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS - Not to exceed $48,990 or 50
percent of the total study costs or ~nd~v~dual voucher subm~smon
N LOCAL SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS - $48,990'~n cash and $0 ~n ~n-
kind services
O VOUCHER SUBMISSION SCHEDULE - Monthly
P OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO STANDARD
AGREEMENT OF THIS CONTRACT -
· Coordination w~th Denton County and US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE)
[] Scope of work w~ll not contain Phase III of Task I (prehm~nary design) of
the ong~nal apphcaflon w~th the exception of Item F
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parhes have caused th~s Contract to be duly executed ~n multiple
ong~nals
THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Deputy Ex~uhve Adm~mstrator
of Planmng
Date /
THE/~CTOR{S)
RK~k Svehla
C~ty Manager
C~ty of Denton
Date
ARTICLE II CORRESPONDENCE
All correspondence between the part~es shall be made to the follow~ng addresses
For the BOARD For the CONTRACTOR{S)
Mr Craig D Pedersen Mr JerryA Clark
Executive Adm~mstrator Director of Englneenng and Transportation
Texas Water Development Board 215 McK~nney Street
P O Box 13231, Capitol Station Denton, TX 76201
Austin, Texas 78711-3231
Attenhon Regional Planning
and ProJects Section
2
SECTION II STANDARDAGREEMENT
ARTICLE I RECITALS
Whereas, the CONTRACTOR(S) apphed to the BOARD, Ausbn, Texas for a planmng grant to
develop a flood protection plan,
Whereas, the CONTRACTOR(S) and PARTICIPANT(S) w~ll commit cash and/or ~n-k~nd services
to pay for the local share of th~s planning project,
Whereas, the CONTRACTOR(S) ~s the entity who w~ll act as administrator of the BOARD's
planmng grant and w~ll be responsible for the execution of th~s contract,
Whereas, on the BOARD APPROVAL DATE, the BOARD approved the CONTRACTOR(S)'s
apphcat~on ,for financial assistance,
Now, therefore, the BOARD and the CONTRACTOR(S), agree as follows
ARTICLE II PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
1 Services and act~wt;es prowded under this Contract shall be in stnct accordance w~th
requirements of the Texas Water Code, Chapter 15, associated rules of the Texas
Administrative Code, Chapter 355, Sect;ons 355 1-355 11, Subchapter A, Exhibit A, the
ongmal grant apphcat;on, which is incorporated here~n and made a permanent part of th~s
Contract, and th~s Contract
2 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll prepare a flood protection plan for the PLANNING AREA, as
delineated and descnbed m Exhib~t A, according to the Scope of Work contained ~n
Exhibit B
3 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll establ;sh formal, d~rect, and continuous ha;sons w;th all
c~fles, counties, councils of governments, nver authonfles, and all applicable state
agencies, d~stncts, federal agencies, including the appropriate project d~rectors of the
U S Army Corps of Engineers, and other governmental ent~t~es hawng flood protection
responsibility w;th~n the PLANNING AREA, and commumty leaders ~n the PLANNING
AREA for the purpose of coordinating the scope of work and flood protection plan w~th all
ex~st~ng studies, plans, or acfiwfles for the purpose of prowdmg ~nformat~on and obtaining
ava;lable data for the development of the flood protection plan The planmng w~ll be
coordinated w~th the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance
Program and all relevant flooding and drainage protechon studies and acflwt;es, which
w~ll, also be rewewed as reformation for the development of th~s flood protection plan It
w;ll also be the respons~b~hty of the CONTRACTOR to sohc~t comments from the general
public as to the content of th~s flood protection planmng project
4 The CONTRACTOR(S) w;ll coordinate the flood protection plan w~th the ex~st;ng plans
and pohc~es of the enflt~es I~sted above, the Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission (TNRCC), and any other affected enflbes
5 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll hold coordination meetings w~th the PARTICIPANTS,
consultants, local enflbes, the TNRCC, the BOARD, and any ~nterested part~es at the
commencement of the project, at 50% completion, and following the STUDY
COMPLETION DATE but before the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE and when deemed
3
necessary by e~ther the BOARD or the CONTRACTOR(S) to discuss the status of the
flood protection plan The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll solicit ~nput and comments from the
affected public on the draft final report and consider such input and comments for
~ncorporat~on m the final report
ARTICLE III SCHEDULE, REPORTS, AND OTHER PRODUCTS
1 The CONTRACTOR(S) has unhl the DEADLINE FOR CONTRACT EXECUTION to
execute th~s Contract and to prowde acceptable ewdence of REQUIRED INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENTS and the CONTRACTOR(S) ab~hty to provide the LOCAL SHARE OF THE
TOTAL STUDY COSTS to the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR or approval of the
BOARD'S SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS w~ll be rescinded
2 The term of th~s Contract shall begin and the CONTRACTOR(S) shall begin performing ~ts
obhgaflons hereunder on the BOARD APPROVAL DATE and shall expire on the FINAL
REPORT DEADLINE Dehvery of an acceptable final report prior to the FINAL REPORT
DEADLINE shall const;tute completion of the terms of this Contract
3 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll complete the Scope of Work and w~ll deliver seven (7)
double-s~ded cop~es of a draft final report to the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR no later
than the STUDY COMPLETION DATE The draft final report will ~nclude the methodology
and findings of the study, ~ncludlng alternatives considered, cost estimates,
recommended alternatives, an implementation plan and schedule, recommended enflt~es
to ~mplement the recommended alternatives, appropriate financing mechamsms, and
other pertinent ~nformahon After a 30-day rewew period, rewew comments w~ll be
returned by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR to the CONTRACTOR(S)
4 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll consider ~ncorporating comments from the EXECUTIVE
ADMINISTRATOR and other commentors on the draft final report into a final report The
CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll include a copy of the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR's comments
in the final report The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll submit one (1) unbound camera ready
original and nme (9) bound double-sided copies of the final report to the EXECUTIVE
ADMINISTRATOR no later than the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE The CONTRACTOR(S)
w~ll submit one (1) electronic copy of any computer programs or models and an
operations manual developed under the terms of th~s Contract
5 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll submit progress reports w~th submittal of vouchers according
to the VOUCHER SUBMISSION SCHEDULE Progress reports shall be in written form
and shall ~nclude a bnef statement of the overall progress made since the last status
report, a bnef descnptlon of any problems that have been encountered dunng the
prowous reporting period that w~ll affect the study, delay the timely completion of any
port~on of th~s Contract, ~nh~b~t the completion of or cause a change in any of the study's
products or obJectives, and a descnpbon of any action the CONTRACTOR(S) plans to
take to correct any problems that have been encountered
6 The COMPLETION DATE and the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE can be extended upon
wntten approval by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR The CONTRACTOR(S) should
not~fy the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR ~n wnflng within ten (10) working days prior to
the COMPLETION DATE or thirty (30) days pnor to the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE that
the CONTRACTOR(S) ~s requesbng an extension to the respective dates
4
ARTICLE IV COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT
1 The BOARD agrees to compensate and reimburse the CONTRACTOR(S) m a total
amount not to exceed the BOARD'S SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS for costs
recurred and pa~d by the CONTRACTOR(S) pursuant to performance of th~s Contract
The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll contribute local matching funds m sources and amounts
defined as the LOCAL SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS The BOARD shall
reimburse the CONTRACTOR(S) for ninety percent (90%) of the BOARD's share of each
~nvo~ce pending the CONTRACTOR(S)'s performance, completion of a Final Report, and
whiten acceptance of sa~d Final Report by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR, at which
time the BOARD shall pay the retained ten percent (10%) to the CONTRACTOR(S)
2 The CONTRACTOR(S) shall submit vouchers and documentation for reimbursement
b~lhng according to the VOUCHER SUBMISSION SCHEDULE and m accordance w~th the
approved task and expense budgets contained ~n Exhibit C to th~s Contract At the
d~screflon of the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR and upon wntten memorandum to the
contract file, the CONTRACTOR(S) has budget flexibility w~thm task and expense budget
categones to the extent that the resulting change ~n amount ~n any one category does not
exceed ten percent (10%) of the total amount authonzed by th~s Contract Larger
dewations shall require a formal contract amendment For all reimbursement billings
including any subcontractor's expenses, the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR must have
prowded written approval of REQUIRED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT(S) and contracts or
agreements between the CONTRACTOR(S) and the subcontractor The
CONTRACTOR(S) ~s fully responsible for paying all charges by subcontractors pnor to
reimbursement by the BOARD
3 The CONTRACTOR(S) and ~ts subcontractors shall maintain satisfactory financial
accounting documents and records, ~ncludmg cop~es of ~nvo~ces and receipts, and shall
make them available for examination and audit by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR
Accounbng by the CONTRACTOR(S) and ~ts subcontractors shall be ~n a manner
consistent w~th generally accepted accounting pnnc~ples
4 A progress report and the following documentation which documents the TOTAL STUDY
COSTS for reimbursement by the BOARD to the CONTRACTOR(S) for the BOARD'S
SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS shall be submitted by the CONTRACTOR(S) to
the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR for reimbursement b~lhng
A Summary of total expenses ~ncurred ~ncludmg the following ~nformat~on
(1) Contractor's Vendor Ident~ficatmn Number,
(2) TVVDB Contract Number,
(3) Total expenses for the b~lhng penod, beg~nmng (date) to ending (date),
(4) Total In-k~nd serwces,
(5) Total Services for th~s period,
(6) Less Local Sham of the total study costs for the b~lhng period,
(7) Total BOARD's share of the total study costs for the b~llmg period,
(8) Amount of reta~nage to be w~thheld for the b~lhng penod,
(9) Total costs to be reimbursed by the BOARD for the b~lhng penod, and
(10) Certification, s~gned by the CONTRACTOR(S) authorized representabve, that
the expenses submitted for the b~lhng penod are a true and correct representation
of amounts pa~d for work performed d~rectly related to th~s contract
B ,Total payment due for a b~lhng penod shall be separated by State F~scal Year (e g,
through August 31, 1995 for State F~scal Year 1995 and beginning September 1, 1995 for
5
State F~scal Year 1996) Supporting ~nformat~on shall also be separated by State F~scal
Year If a voucher Is submitted that requests payment on services performed in more
than one F~scal Year, a breakdown per F~scal Year shall be included,
C For d~rect expenses ~ncurred by the CONTRACTOR(S) for outside consulting services
-- cop~es of ~nvo~ces to the CONTRACTOR(S) showing the tasks that were performed, the
pement and cost of each task completed, a total cost figure for each d~rect expense
category ~ncludmg labor, fnnge, overhead, travel, communication and postage, techmcal
and computer services, expendable supphes, pnnt~ng and reproduction, and the total
dollar amount due to the consultant, and
D For travel and subsistence expenses, ~nclud~ng such expenses for subcontractors --
(1) names, dates, work locations, t~me penods at work locations, ~tem~zatlon of
subsistence expenses of each employee, limited, however, to travel expenses authonzed
for state employees by the General Appropnaflons Act, Tex Law Regular Session, 1995,
Art IX, Sec 12 through 18, at IX43 or as amended or superseded,
(2) other transportation costs -- cop~es of ~nvo~ces covenng t~ckets for transportahon or, ~f
not available, names, dates, and points of travel of ~ndiwduals, and
(3) all other reimbursable expenses -- ~nvo~cas or purchase vouchers showing reason for
expense w~th receipts to ewdence the amount recurred
ARTICLE V OWNERSHIP, PUBLICATION, AND SUBCONTRACTING
I The BOARD shall have unlim~ted rights to technical or other data resulting d~rectly from
the performance of serwces under th~s Contract It ~s agreed that all reports, drafts of
reports, or other matenal, data, drawings, computer programs and codes associated with
th~s Contract and developed by the CONTRACTOR(B) or ~ts subcontractors pursuant to
this Contract shall become the ,Iomt property of the CONTRACTOR(S) and the BOARD
These materials shall not be copynghted or patented by the CONTRACTOR(B) or by any
consultants ~nvolved ~n th~s Contract unless the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR approves
~n wntmg the nght to establish copynght or patent, provided, however, that copyrighting or
patenting by the CONTRACTOR(S) or ~ts subcontractors w~ll ~n no way I~m~t the BOARD's
access to or nght to request and receive or d~stnbute data and ~nformafion obtained or
developed pursuant to th~s Contract Any matenal subject to a BOARD copynght and
produced by the CONTRACTOR(S) or BOARD pursuant to th~s Contract may be pnnted
by the CONTRACTOR(S) or the BOARD at their own cost and dlstnbuted by e~ther at
their d~scret~on The CONTRACTOR(S) may otherwise utilize such material prowded
under th~s Contract as ~t deems necessary and appropnate, including the right to pubhsh
and d~stnbute the materials or any parts thereof under ~ts own name, prowded that any
BOARD copyright ~s appropnately noted on the pnnted matenals
2 The CONTRACTOR(S) agrees to acknowledge the BOARD ~n any news releases or other
publications relahng to the work performed under th~s Contract
3 No work herein called for by the CONTRACTOR(S) shall be reimbursed for expenses by
the BOARD to the CONTRACTOR(S) w~thout pnor wntten approval by the EXECUTIVE
ADMINISTRATOR of the contract or agreement between the CONTRACTOR(S) and ~ts
subcontractor Each subcontract or agreement shall ~nclude a detailed budget eshmate
w~th specific cost details for each task or specific ~tem of work to be performed by the
subcontractor and for each category of reimbursable expenses The subcontracts shall
6
conform to the terms of the Contract and ~nclude prows~ons which require subcontractor
compliance w~th BOARD rules ~ The CONTRACTOR(S) must also adhere to all
requirements ~n state law pertaining to the procurement of professmnal services
ARTICLE ¥1 AMENDMENT, TERMINATION, AND STOP ORDERS
1 Th~s Contract may be altered or amended by mutual wntten consent or terminated by the
EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR at any time by wntten not~ce to the CONTRACTOR(S)
Upon rece,pt of such termination not~ce, the CONTRACTOR(S) shall, unless the notice
d~rects otherwise, ~mmed~ately discontinue all work ~n connection w~th the performance of
this Contract and shall proceed to cancel promptly all ex~sflng orders insofar as such
orders are chargeable to th~s Contract The CONTRACTOR(S) shall submit a statement
showing in detail the work performed under th~s Contract to the date of termination The
BOARD shall then pay the CONTRACTOR(S) promptly that proportion of the prescnbed
fee which apphes to the work actually performed under this Contract, less all payments
that have been prewously made Thereupon, cop~es of all work accomphshed under th~s
Contract shall be delivered to the BOARD
2 The EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR may issue a Stop Work Order to the
CONTRACTOR(S) at any time Upon receipt of such order, the CONTRACTOR(S) shall
d~scontlnue all work under th~s Contract and cancel all orders pursuant to th~s Contract,
unless the order directs otherwise If the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR does not ~ssue
a Restart Order w~thm 60 days after receipt by the CONTRACTOR(S) of the Stop Work
Order, the CONTRACTOR(S) shall regard th~s Contract terminated ~n accordance w~th
the foregoing prows~ons
ARTICLE VII NO DEBT AGAINST THE STATE
1 Th~s Contract and Agreement shall not be construed as creating any debt by or on behalf
of the State of Texas and the BOARD, and all obligations of the State of Texas are
subject to the ava~lablhty of funds To the extent the performance of th~s Contract
transcends the bmnmum ~n which th~s Contract ~s entered into, th~s Contract is specifically
contingent upon the continued authonty of the BOARD and appropnabons therefore
ARTICLE VIII LICENSES, PERMIT, AND INSURANCE
1 For the purpose of th~s Contract, the CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll be considered an
~nd~pendent contractor and therefore solely responsible for hab~hty resulting from
negligent acts or omissions The CONTRACTOR(S) shall obtain all necessary insurance,
~n the judgement of the CONTRACTOR(S), to protect themselves, the BOARD, and
employees and officials of the BOARD from hab~hty ansmg out of th~s Contract The
CONTRACTOR(S) shall ~ndemn~fy and hold the BOARD and the State of Texas
harmless, to the extent the CONTRACTOR(S) may do so ~n accordance w~th state law,
from any and all loses, damages, hab~hty, or claims therefore, on account of personal
injury, death, or property damage of any nature whatsoever caused by the
CONTRACTOR(S), ans~ng out of the acbwtms under th~s Contract
2 The CONTRACTOR(S) shall be solely and entirely responsible for procunng all
appropriate hcenses and permits which may be required by any competent authonty for
the CONTRACTOR(S) to perform the subject work
ARTICLE IX SEVERANCE PROVISION
I Should any one or more prows~ons of th~s Contract be held to be null, void, voidable, or
for any reason whatsoever, of no force and effect, such provision(s) shall be construed as
severable from the remainder of th~s Contract and shall not affect the validity of all other
prows~ons of th~s Contract which shall remain of full force and effect
EXHIBIT B
SCOPE OF WORK (Page B-1 to B-6 of Original Grant Application)
10
EXHIBIT C
I TASK BUDGET
Cooper Creek Regional Detention Study
TASK DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 Reconnaissance and data cotle~ion $3 162 {30
2 Conceptual Evaluation $20,070 00
3 t Prepare Information for CLOMR Request $1,706 00
4 Other Expenses S27,966 00
Total $5%904 00
Pecan Creek Flow Diversion Mit~gation Study
TASK DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1 Reconnaissance and data celh~'flon $3,242 00
2 Preliminary Design $23,497 {30
3 Other Expenses $18,337 00
Total $45~076 00
EXPENSE BUDGET
CATEGORY TOTAL Freese and N~chols, Inc Survey I Geotechmcal
AMOUNT SubconsultantI Subconsultant
A Salanes & Wages~ $15,199 $8 504 $6,728
B Fnnge2 $7,361 $1,486 $1 316
C Travel $188 $300 $250
D Expendable Suppllss $0 $150 $150
E Subcontract $100,825 $37,363 $0 $0
Services
F Tech/Comp Svcs $3,823 $2 500 $3,000
G Commumcatmns $174 $100 $100
H Reproduction $343 $0 $0
Overhead3 $17,345 $3,508 $3,105
J Profit $16,184 $3,270 $2,895
TOTAL $97,980 00 $19,818 00 $17r545 00
11
~ Salanes and War:les ~s defined as the cost of salaries of engineers, draftsmen, stenographers,
surveymen clerks, laborers etc for time d~rectly chargeable to this contract
= Fnnoe is defined as the cost of social secunb/contributions, unemployment, exc~se, and payroll taxes,
employment compensabon insurance, rebrement benefits, medical and insurance benefits, sick leave,
vacation, and hohday pay apphcable thereto
~ Overhead ~s defined as the costs ~ncurred ~n maintaining a place of bus~ness and performing professional
serwces s~mllar to those specified In th~s contract These costs shall include the following
· Indirect salanes, including that po~on of the salary of pflncipale and executives that ~s
allocable to general super~slon,
· Indirect salary fnnge benefits,
· Accounting and legal services related to normal management and business operations,
· Travel costs recurred ~n the normal course of overall administration oflhe business,
· Eqmpment rental,
· Deprec~abon of furmture, fixtures, equipment, and vehicles,
· Dues, subscnpbons, and fees associated with trade, business, technical, and professional
organlzabons,
· Other Insurance,
· Rent and ut~l~Jes, and
· Repairs and maintenance of furmture, fixtures, and equipment
12
APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GRANT
FOR
COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION POND
PECAN CREEK REGIONAL CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY
Prepared for
THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
by
FREESE AND NICHOLS, ]NC
AUGUST 1995
FREESE - NICHOLS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I INTRODUCTION 1
II PLANNING INFORMATION 4
III WRITTEN ASSLrRANCES 10
IV PROOF OF NOTIFICATION 10
EXHIBIT A - Planmng Area Map
EXHIBIT B - Detailed Scope of Work
EXHIBIT C - Detmled Task and Budget
EXHIBIT D - Proposed Time Schedule
EXHIBIT E - Staff Quahficauons
EXttlBIT' F - Wnttan Assurances
EXHIBIT G- Proof of Not~ficaUon
EXIqlBIT H - 1996-2000 Capital Improvement Program
APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GRANT
FOR
COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION POND
AND
i PECAN CREEK REGIONAL CBANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
The following application is presented to the Texas Water Development Board for consideration m
response to the request for proposals as adverused m the August 4, 1995 Texas iegtster for the
funding of a regional detention study for the Cooper Creek watershed and a regional channel
improvement study for the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed wttinn the City of Denton,
Texas To, assist m the TWDB revaew process, the format of tins application parallels the guidelines
for funding apphcations procedures obtained from the TWDB
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
The City of Denton is a political subdixasmn of the State &Texas wath the authority to plan for and
implement flood protemon meamres and is a member of the National Flood Insurance Program
(1) Legal name of apphcant
City of Denton
(2) Participating pohtical subd~visions
City of Denton
(3) Authority of law under winch each political subdivaslon was created
The City of Denton, Texas was chartered on February 24, 1959 as a General Law City, with
the power to levy taxes
(4) Name, litle, address, phone number and facsimile number of applicant's official representative
Mr Jerry Clark, P E
Director of Engineermg and Transportation
215 McKanney Street
Denton, TX 76201
Ph (817) 566-8358
Fax (817) 566-8236
(5) CttaUons of apphcant's legal authority to plan for and ~mplement flood protection measures
The C~ty of Denton has junsd~ctaon to implement dnunagu design criteria and general
sub&wsion regulations as per ns Subd~vismn Ordinances All drainage ~mprovements must
comply w~th the drainage design cntena and must be approved by the Director of Enl0neenng
and Transportataon prior to unplementaUon The C~ty of Denton has adopted a flood control
ordinance in accordance w~th the Natmnal Flood Insurance Program requirements
(6) Is tYas apphcataon m response to a pubhshed Request for Proposals hst m the Texas Regls~er?
Yes
(7) Document number of Request for Proposals and date published
TRD #9509442 pubhshed m the Texas Regtster, August 4, 1995
(8) The total anticlpated planmng cost of the regional detention study
The total planmng cost is expected to be $120,000
(9) Total mount of grant funds requested fi.om the TWDB
The amount of funding requested ts $60,000
(10) Apphcant cash contribution to the study
The Ctty of Denton will match the $60,000 proxaded by the TWDB
(11) Source of cash cuntnbution, explanation of source of local cash contnbuUon and hst of
sources
(a) General Revenue
(b) Bond Funds
(c)
(Exact amount from each source cannot be determaned at ttus t~me Funding will be fi.om
either or both of these sources based on the availability of funds when the project is
undertaken )
(12) Apphcant m-land contnbutlons, including a descnption of in-land services to be provaded
None
2
(13) D~tailed description of why proposed planning IS needed
Cooper Creek Regional Detention
A sigmficant portion of the Cooper Creek watershed is presently undeveloped The current
development trend is to proceed from the south to the north Fortunately, the bulk of the
undeveloped area m the watershed is m the upper one-tlurd of the watershed (north) There
are several segments of Cooper Creek that are currently experiencing erosion due to the
increase m development m the watershed and two bridges have been washed out The lower
portion of Cooper Creek is fully developed and channel improvements in this area are not
economically feasible, since there is essentially no room for cbsnnel expansion
Implementation of a regional detenUon system may provide adequate flood protection and
allow the development m the watershed to continue as well as prevent further erosion damage
downstream
Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement
The malonty of the Pecan Creek Tnbutary PEC-4 watershed is presently developed There
are slgmficant areas along the tributary that are vathin the 100-year floodway, w~eh are
presently developed for commeroal and residential use The primary cause of the inundation
of these areas is the exlstlng M K T Railroad crossing near the center of the stream length,
which causes sufficient backwater that water is diverted from the mare channel rotc Bell
Avenue and In three directions, one of which is out of the PEC-4 watershed and into the
Pecan Creek watershed The diverted flow diversion Is of sufficient magmtude that the Corps
of Engineers has delineated a floodway along the flow diversion path In addition to the
backwater caused by the railroad, there is insufficient channel capacity downstream of the
railroad crossing to convey the 100-year floodwaters
The proposed planning is intended to ehminate the lnterbasm flow diversion by providing
sufficient channel improvements for flood control within the entire Pecan Creek Tnbutary
PEC-4 watershed (approximately 1 5 stream miles) Flood control will be achieved by
restricting the 100-year stormwater flow to the PEC-4 channel area Implementing the
proposed planmng measures will remove a large number of properties from the floodway,
including some existing homes Also, there will be an additional benefit to the properues
along the ms~n. Pecan Creek stream by ehrn~nating the flow diversions from Tributary PEC-4
(14) Detailed description of'why funding assistance is needed
The flood protection planmng process must be approached on a watershed-w~de basis to
provide an orderly system ofmiprovements Planning efforts that are watershed-wide are by
nature more costly than isolated, or local improvements Unfortunately, the Cluzens of
Denton are more willing to prowde funding for the physical improvements associated with
the local projects than they are for planmng efforts (local or regional) Funding for the
structural ~mprovements to be developed by fins proposed planning effort ts currently
available through the City's capnal ~mprovement program (see Item l 1 below) The current
capital maprovement program does not include funding for the planmng effort needed to
develop the reqmred structrual xmprovements Obtmmng funding assistance for these
planmng efforts could lrnt~ate additmnal funchng from other sources
(15) IdenuficaUon of potenUal sources and amounts of funding available for nnplementaUon of
viable flood protecuon measures resulting from the proposed planmng
The proposed Capital Improvement Program for 1996-97 include
(a) Cooper Creek Improvements (Phase I) $502,000
(b) Pecan Creek Tnb PEC-4 Imprvmts (Near Robertson St ) $734,000
The proposed Capital Improvement Program for 1998-99 ~nclude
(c) Pecan Creek Tnb PEC-4 Imprvmts (Near Bradshaw St ) $734,000
(d) Cooper Creek Improvements (Phases H and III) $1,162,000 and $712,000
H. PLANNING INFORMATION
(16) Descnptmn ofgeograpl~cal planmng area
Cooper Creek.
The City of Denton ~s located in Denton County at the junctaon of Interstate I-hghways 35E
and 35W, approxamately 41 males northwest of Dallas, Texas and approramately 36 males
northeast of Fort Worth, Texas The Cooper Creek watershed contoans approximately 4,500
acres and generally slopes from the northwest to the southeast toward the Lake Lewisxalle
reservmr The Cooper Creek watershed hes almost entirely vafinn the City of Denton proper
or 1ts extratemtonal junsdict~on There are also four tributaries to Cooper Creek that will
be studied for detentmn posslbfl~Ues m the proposed project
Pecan Creek
The Pecan Creek Tnbutary PEC-4 watershed contains apprommately 1,100 acres located
enurely vofinn the City of Denton and generally slopes from the northwest to the southeast
toward the Lake Lew~svflle reservoir The headwaters of the tributary begin at the Umvemty
of North Texas campus The majonty of the stream length extends through the older section
of the city, including a downtown commemal Oasmct, a low income residentlal neighborhood
and an eyastlng cemetery
4
(17) M~p of proposed planmng area I, ,, ,~7
See Extablt A
(18) D6scnptlon of cresting or potential flood hazard the planmng is intended to address and the
way m which the proposed planning wdl address the problem
Cooper Creek Regional Detention
Emstmg developments along the lower segments of Cooper Creek are experiencing erosion
al6ng the channel banks The culvert crossings at Mayhfll and Mmgo Roads are severely
undersized and have washed out m the past Mayhill road is an arterial with a dmly traffic
load of 2,000 to 3,000 vehicles per day IVhngo Road is a heaxuly traveled route w~th
apprommately 4,000 vpd, which consists largely of people who commute to and from the City
of Denton from the east Further development m the upstream portaons of the Cooper Creek
w~tershed can cause these problems to mtensify, causing w~despread erosion along the creek
through the emstang developments and contanued damage to the Mlngo Road culvert The
damage from flooding is likely to vary widely, ranging from simple channel bank erosion, to
potential damage to structures along the creek, to potentaal injury resultang from another
Mingo Road culvert wash-out Development is such that there is no room for expanchng the
ex~stmg channel for flood protectmn
The proposed planmng will determine the potantaal for detention sites upstream of the
historically flooded areas to help maintain, or possibly reduce, crusting peak discharges along
Cooper Creek A system of detentton ponds constructed within the watershed cannot be
constructed at random w~thout evaluating the cumulatave effect of several detentton ponds
o~ the peak flow v~thin Cooper Creek It is possible that a randomly constructed system of
de~entton ponds can make eondtttons worse along Cooper Creek by causing peak flows from
one or more tnbutanes to coincide wath peaks on the mare stem of Cooper Creek
P0can Creek Regional Channel Improvement
Since the majonty of the PEC-4 tributary flows through ex~stmg developments, there is a high
potential for property damage as a result of the floodwaters leaving the channel banks
Diverted flow that leaves the mare channel flows along Bell Avenue, which has a daffy traffic
load of approximately 11,000 vehicles There is also a potenual for cmzen injury and/or death
at]some of the stream crossings In several locations, the crusting tnbutary channel is several
fe~t deep and is dtrectly adjacent to the roadway or along a shopping center parking lot
F~hally, the downstream half of the tributary passes through a low income residential
ne~lghborhood, where there is a htgh potential for injury since many of the homes were
constructed long ago and are located very close to the channel
The proposed planning will determine the extent of channel improvements needed to llrmt the
100-year floodplmn to the channel area, thus remo~nng a slgmficant number of presently
developed commercial properties and residences from the floodway
(19) Descnptlon ofl~stoncal flooding and flood damage in the proposed planmng area
Cooper Creek Regional Detention
Flooding problems m the Cooper Creek watershed are relatively new due to the development
that took place m the late 1970's and early 1980's Since this development occurred, the City
of Denton has had at least two 10-year storms that produced sufficient runoff to overtop most
of the bndges/culverts along Cooper Creek Most of the older bndges (20 to 30 years old)
will convey runoffon the order of a S-year frequency There have been instances where the
bridges at Mayhfll and lVfingo Roads have been completely washed out Temporary culverts
have been installed at the Mayhfll and M~ngo Road crossing untat such time as the potential
for wash-out is s~;ficantly reduced In adchtaon, many areas along Cooper Creek, especially
the older, established residential areas are expenancmg bank eros;on There have been
instances where floodwaters have inundated homes in these areas
Pecan Creek Remonal Channel Improvement
Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 flows through some of the oldest neighborhoods wittun the
City of Denton, be~mnmng at the Umversity of North Texas, contmmng through the southern
portion of downtown, and then through an older low income residential area Many buddings
are located only a few feet from the channel bank In one case, a budding was constructed
over the channel The emst~ng channel was constructed m many stages beginning m the late
1920% to the early 1960% There is no documentation offloochng prior to the early 1980's
In the 1960's and 1970% the Umvemty of North Texas constructed many new buildings and
parking lots Several of the older single farmly residential neighborhoods near the umvemty
have been converted to mult~-farmly uses The amount of runoff from these areas has
increased dramatically
The City of Denton has experienced at least two 10-year storms since 1981 In those
instances, there were severe street flooding along Tributary PEC-4, as well as bridge
overtopping The worst flooding has bean observed to occur on Bell Avenue just upstream
of the lvlKT Rmlroad/Robertson Street crossing Stormwater has been observed as h~gh as
five feet, stranding several motorists and inundating nearby homes During the flood events,
the residential area east of Bell Avenue, south of I-hckory Street and north of Dallas Drive
become maccess~ble to emergency vel~cles Current hydraulic models suggest that much of
the downtown area and many of the older neighborhoods would be inundated by the 100-year
stormwaters
6
(20) Descnptton of how the planning ~ address pubhc safety and welfare
Cooper Creek Regtonal Detention
The objecttve of the proposed planp!n$ Is to develop a system of regional detention ponds to
reduce the peak &scharges along Cooper Creek such that the erosion along the creek can be
reduced or ehmmated The re~onal ponds vall maintain peak discharge at a level consistent
w~th file capacity of the existing ~ownstream channel to avoad channel improvements m an
alr0ady conflno~l space Also, reducing the peak dascharges along Cooper Creek will reduce
the size of a new culvert?ondge at Mayhdl and M~ngo Roads to prevent future wash-outs
The reductton m peak chscharges will reduce, or posstbly ehn~nate the potential damage to
structures along Cooper Creek, especially at Maylmll and IVhngo Roads, thereby reducing the
polenttal comprormse of the pubhc safety and welfare
Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement
l~.h~rmnntlng the flow dtverslon by confimng the floodwaters to the channel area will remove
a s~,tleant number of presently developed propemes from the floodway, thereby reducing
the~ potential for injury and/or death related to flooding along the tnbuta~j In addition, there
wdl be a sigmflcant reductton m the property damage expected along the creek
Implementation of the flood protecuon measures may have a l~gh potential for econonuc
b~ettt since the flood prote~on is hkely to proxade oppormmties for the excasmg propemes
to ~expand and/or re-develop
(21) Current unemployment rate m the proposed planmog area
Cooper Creek watershed 3 13%
Pecan Creek watershed 6 9%
(22) Current per-capita raceme an the proposed planning area
C~oper Creek watershed $15,841
Pecan Creek'watershed $10,294
(23) Current population residing in the proposed planmng area
Cooper Creek watershed 2100
Pecan Creek watershed 2750
(24) Current population residing m the lO0-year floodplain
C~oper Creek watershed 1700
Pecan Creek watershed 2200
(25) Value of property in the 100-year floodplain
Cooper Creek watershed $48,809,200
Pecan Creek watershed $58,393,825
(26) Number of National Flood Insurance Program pohcaes m effect m the proposed plann,ng area
There are currently 271 NFIP pohcles in effect Cooper and Pecan Creeks Detailed
mformataon of the number of poheaes in effect per watershed was not av~ulable from FEMA
However, we estamate the estimate there to be 135 current pohc~es an the Cooper Creek
watershed and 40 in the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed
(27) Method for determanaUon of potential cost effecttveness of proposed flood protection
solutions
Cooper Creek Regional Detentaon
The method for deterrmmng the potential cost effectiveness of the proposed regional
detenUon system Is to compare the cost of the proposed detentaon pond system to the value
of property removed from the floodplain Addluonal conslderatmn vail be g~ven to the
redu~on m the flood hazard potential, whether property damage or injury to the cltazens in
the planmng area A level of protection of the proposed regional detentaon system wdl be
determined on a recurrence mterval basis 0 e to deterrmne the frequency of flooding vath the
regional detention system in place)
Pecan Creek Re~,lonal Channel Improvement,
The method for detenmmng the potential cost effecttveness of the proposed channel
maprovements ~s to compare the cost of the proposed Improvements to the value of property
removed from the floodplain Additional consideration will be given to the reduction m the
flood hazard potentaal, whether property damage or injury to the cmzens m the planmng area
(28) Date(s) and desenptaon(s) of most recem flood protection planmng m the proposed planmng
area
Cooper Creek Regional Detention
None to date
Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement
Dunng the period of June 1993 to February 1994, the Caty of Denton lured a consultant to
investigate possible actions to reduce flooding along Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 between
8
Bell Avenue and Lakey Street Several hydrauhc Stream modlficataons were rewewed, such
as removing exastmg culverts, expansion of exastmg bridges, etc An abandoned nulroad
bridge crossing was removed at a cost of $20,000 m an attempt to xmprove the channel
conveyance The result of the bridge removal was to only shghtly reduce the floodplain
elevatson Other investigations made suggest that md~wdual aeuons, such as culvert removal,
would have httle or no effect when implemented individually, but ffdone m combmaUon the
culvert maprovements may have a s~gmficant ~mpact on the floodplain elevatmn Therefore,
a regional approach to flood planmug along the Tributary PEC-4 xs thought to provide an
econonucal approach
(29) '
Desenpt~on of how the proposed planmng will coordinate w~th other flood protection plans
or facilities m the planmng area, surrounding regions, and the state
Both pomons of the proposed study will be performed using the C~ty of Denton Master
Drcanage Plan as a gtude when detenmmng the locatmn of the proposed regmnal detentmn
pond rotes and the possible channel ~mprovement scenanos In addmon, the C~ty of Denton
Drainage Des~Sn Criteria Manual will be used to evaluate the hydrologic and hydrauhc
characten~cs of the regmnal detention ponds and the proposed channel ~mprovements The
C~ty's thorough fare master plan, master zomng plan and water and sewer master plans will
belconsulted dunng the study
(30) Detailed scope of work for the proposed planning
See attached Exhibit B
(3 l) Task and budget for detailed scope of work by task
See attached Exlub~t C
(32) T~me schedule for completing the detailed scope of work by task
See attached Exhtb~t D
(33) Expense budget for total proposed planmng
See attached Extub~t C
(34) Quahficataons and d~rect experience of proposed project staff
S~e attached Erdubn E
9
(35) Identafy the watershed(s) for which flood protecUon needs roll be addressed
Cooper Creek and Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watersheds
(36) Description of how flood protection needs of the entare watershed vol1 be considered
Refer to Item 20 above
(37) Method of momtonng study progress
Penodtc (at least monthly) project coordmatton meetangs between City staffand consultant
HI. WRITTEN ASSURANCES
(3 8) Proposed planning does not duphcate e~Ung projects with the exceptmn of updating emsUng
flood protection plans
See attached Exlubit F
(39) lmplementatton of viable soluttons ldenUfied through the proposed plann~r~g vail be diligently
pursued and local sources of funding for tmplementataon of v~able solutions ~ be provaded
See attached Exlubit F
(40) Wntten exadence that local matching funds and m-kand services are available for the proposed
plamng
See attached Exhtblt F
(4 l) Applicant is a pamclpant in the Nattonal Flood Insurance Program
The City of Denton participates in the National Flood Insurance Program and is hstefl as
Commumty Number 480194
See attached Exl~bit F
IV, PROOF OF NOTIFICATION
Notaficatlon to all political subdivisions in the proposed planning area by cemfled m~ that an
apphcaUon for planning grant assistance is being filed with the TWDB has been sent to the following
Denton County and the Denton Independent School District (refer to Exhtbits G and It)
l0
EXHIBIT B
DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK
FOR TASK 1:
COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION STUDY
PHASE I - RECONNAISSANCE & DATA COLLECTION
A A coordinatmn meeUng will be held between the City and its consultant for the purpose of
reviewing avadable data for use during the study, reviewing the scope of the work to be done
and the objec~ves of the study, and to review the project personnel and their responslblhties
for both the City and its consultant
B Perform visit to the Cooper Creek watershed to evaluate possible sites for regional detention
pogds The site wsit ,will include the rewew of not more than s~x possible sites for
acceptahihty as regional detention faclhties, including the following
1 The area north of Cooper Creek, east of Old North Road, west of Loop 288, and
south of Windsor Street
2 The area north of Kings Row, east of Yorkshire, and southwest of Loop 288
3 The area north of Hercules, east of F M 2164, south of Loop 288, and west of
Redstone
4 The area north of Evers Parkway, west ofF M 2164, and south of Loop 288
5 Two other addiuonal sites may be selected for evaluation in the study if conditions
observed during the site visit suggest a favorable location
C Coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to obtain the latest hydrologic
and hydrauhe computer models for the Cooper Creek watershed
D Coordinate with local utihty companies to determine the presence of existing utihty lines
wlflun the possible regional detention facility site listed in Item B above
E Coordinate with the City staff to obtain available base mapping The base map(s) will be
prepared by the City from information currently available on its geographic information
system (GIS)
F Coordinate with survey subconsultant to obtain field data necessary for preliminary sizing of
the proposed detention facilities at each location
G Coordinate with geotechmcal subconsultant to obtain soil bonng data at each site One
B-1
EXHIBIT B
bonng will be made at each location selected as a possible detention site
PHASE H - CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION
A Perform hydrologic analysis on the sites identified m Item I B above, including the followmg
1 Computation of contributing drannage area to the sites being evaluated
2 Modify the existing hydrologic computer model from FEMA Of avlulable) to include
design computation points at the potential regmnal detention facility sites If an
existing hydrologic computer model is not available, a new model will have to be
created
3 Determination of the 5-, 10-, 25-, 50- and 100-year peak discharges for exasting and
ultimate watershed conditions with the detention facilities in place at each potential
regional detention faeihty site The typical SCS primary spillway will be used to
estimate peak discharges w~th the proposed detention facilities in place
4 Determine the maximum storage available at each of the rel0onal detention facility
sites Future development adjacent to each site will be considered in the
determination of the detention pond layout phase in addition to the existing
development surrounding each site
5 Evaluate the cumulative effect of the regional detention facilities on the peak
discharges along Cooper Creek for the portion of the creek upstream of Loop 288
Pnontize the regmnal detention pond construction by cost/benefit analysis No more
than twelve constmeuon sequence scenarios will be evaluated to determane the effect
of construction sequencing on the Cooper Creek peak discharges
B Perform hydraulic analysis of ~mpact of detention facflmes on Cooper Creek floodplain
1 Modify existing HEC-2 hydrauhc stream model of Cooper Creek to include the peak
discharges computed in Item II A above
2 Compute expected floodplain profiles corresponding to 10-, 50- 100- and 500-year
frequencies
3 Delineate the 100-year floodplmns on available topographic maps for existing
conditions and ultimate development conditions with the proposed detention facilities
in place
4 Prepare summary table of results ofhydrauhc ailalysis
B-2
EXHIBIT B
C Prepare a conceptual est,mate of ahti61p~,t~d construchon costs associated w~th the proposed
regional detention system
D Remew the TNRCC regulataons'assoc, ated w~th detention facd~ty construction and outline
steps needed to obtain TNRCC approval of the proposed regaonal detenuon system Potential
problem areas, If any, will be also identified
E Summarize the results of the conceptual evaluation
1 Prepare a report sumrnarlZmg the findings of the conceptual evaluation The
following ~tems shall be included m the conceptual report
a Comparison of chscharges for cresting development, ultimate watershed
development, and ultmate watershed development w~th the proposed regional
detention system m place
b Map showing the enttre watershed w~th the locations of the proposed regional
detention faclhties and their respechve contributing draanage areas, the
hormontal location of the exasting utihtles that could pose a potential conflmt
w~th the proposed detention facilities, and the 100-year floodplmn hmats for
cresting conditions and ult, mate watershed cond~taons with the detention
faclhtaes m place
c The antmpated constmctton costs of the regional detention facilities on a per-
me basis as well as for the entire regional detention system A
recommendation will be made concermng the sequencing of construcung the
regional detention facilities m accordance with Item II A above
d A recommendatton for alternative dry weather uses for the regtonal detention
fac~ties, as well as the possibility ofretmmng water ~n the ponds for aesthetm
purposes, such as ,n a park
2 Conduct a coordination meeting wnh the consultant to discuss the results of the
conceptual evaluation and the consultant's recommendations for proceeding w~th the
project
PHASE HI - PRELIMINARY DESIGN
A One meeting will be held wtth affected property owners near each of the proposed regional
detention faaht~es, up to a maximum of six meetings wth the property owners Items to be
discussed include the purpose of the proposed regmnal detention system, concerns the
property owners may have regarding the detention facdmes, and ideas for incorporating the
detention faclhttes into multi-use facilities, such as soccer fields, etc
B-3
EXHIBIT B
B Develop a prehrmnary desagn of the proposed detention facilities at the sates ~dent~fied ~n
Task II
1 Determine a stumble layout of each of the proposed regional detentton facflmes No
more than three alternatxve layouts will be investigated at each s~te dunng the
prehrmnary design phase The concerns of each neaghborhood will be addressed and
incorporated rote the desagn, ff applacable
2 Develop a prehnunary design of the dam structure and primary and emergency
spillways for each sate The design of the dam and spillways shall consider the
erdstmg condmons and expected future development at each sxte
C Refme the hydrologic and hydrauhc models to be consistent with the proposed detention
facility layouts and spillways ~dentlfied m Item III B above
D Refine the conceptual construction cost estimate to consider ~tems developed dunng the
prehminary design phase
E Assist the City wath the preparation of the necessary documentatton to be submitted to the
TNRCC for approval of the regmnal detention faclhty design and to obtain the necessary
pernuts for constructmn of the regional detentton fac~httes
F Prepare the necessary mformataon needed for a subnuttal to the Federal Emergency
Management Agency to obtain a Cond~taonal Letter of Map Rewsmn (CLOMR)
G Prepare a report summanzmg the results of the preliminary design task, including
recommendataons and ~dentltlcat~on of potential problem areas The report will be presented
by the consultant to the C~ty at a coordmataon meeting
B-4
EXHIBIT B
DETAIEED SCOPE OF WORK
FOR TASK 2:
PECAN CREEK TRIB. PEC-4 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY
PHASE I - RECONNAISSANCE & DATA COLLECTION
A A coordmatton meeting will be held between the City and its consultant for the purpose of
reviewing avatlable data for use dunng the study, reviewing the scope of the work to be done
and the objecttves of the study, and to rewew the project personnel and their responsibilities
for both the City and its consultant
B Perform visit to the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed to observe the exastlng
condmons of the channel The site wm will also include the preparation ora photograptuc
record of the conditions that presently erdst along the channel, w~th particular attention
focused on areas where potential design problems area anticipated
C Coordinate w~th the Federal Emergency Management Agency to obtain the latest hydrologic
and hydraulic computer models for Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4
D Coordinate with survey subconsultaut to obtain field data, including the location and fimshed
floor elevatton of structures adjacent to the creek, channel cross sectmns, and bridge/culvert
data for the entire length of the stream
E Coordinate with local utility compames to determine the presence of exastmg utility lines
along Tributary PEC-4
PHASE H - PRELIMINARY DESIGN
A Perform hydrauhc analysis of impact of the proposed channel ~mprovements to Pecan Creek
Tributary PEC-4
1 Evaluate not more than three channel improvement scenarios to deterrmne the type
~ and extent of channel anprovements needed to ehnmnate the diversion of stormwater
fi.om the PEC-4 watershed to the Pecan Creek watershed The intent of the channel
nnprovement evaluatton wtll be to maintain the 100-year floodplmn within the channel
banks as required by the City of Denton draanage criteria
2 Evaluate the need for increasing bridge/culvert sizes for the crossings along Tributary
PEC-4
3 Dehneate on avmlable topograp~c maps the 100-year floodplaans for exastlng
conditions and conditions with the proposed channel improvements m place
B-5
EXHIBIT B
4 Prepare summary table of results of hydrauhc ailalysIS
C Prepare a conceptual estunate of anucipated construction costs associated with the proposed
channel improvement scenarios evaluated in the study A cost/benefit analysis will be made
of each channel improvement scanano developed
D Keview the Corps of Engineers regulatmns associated with 404 Pernuts and outline steps
needed to obtain 404 Pernnt approval of the proposed channel improvements Potential
problem areas, ifa. ny, will be also ldenttfied
E Prepare the necessary mformaUon required for a subrmttal to the Federal Emergency
Management Agency for a Conditnonal Letter of Map Revision (CLOIVI~) reflecting the
proposed pla.nmng project
F Summarize the results of the prehrmna~y design
1 Prepare a report summanzang the findings of the prelmunary design The following
1terns shall be included in the design report
a Tabular comparison of floodplain elevations for erasttng channel conditions
and condmons with the proposed channel improvements m place
b Map showing the enttre watershed vath the locations of the proposed channel
nnprovements, the locatton and type of bridge/culvert improvements needed,
the horizontal location of the erastmg utilities that could pose a potential
confhct with the channel ~mprovemants, and the 100-year floodplain hnuts for
erdstmg condmons and condmons with the channel improvements in place
c Cross secttons of the channel maprovements m sufficient detail to illustrate the
type of improvements proposed
d An estimate of the probable construction costs and total project costs of the
channel improvements
2 Conduct a coordination meeting to discuss the results of the prehmma_ry desagn and
the consultant's recommendations for proceeding with the project
B-6
DETAILED TASK AND BUDGET
~lqiBrr c
TASK I - COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION STUDY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
TOTAL PROJECT $74 886
ExMl~rr c
TASK 2 - PECAN CREEK FLOW DIVERSION MITIGATION STUDY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
TOTAL PROJECT $46,076
EXHIBIT E
John Lee Rutledge, P.E.
Principal
YEARS EXPERIENCE: With Th~s F~nn 10 W~th Other F~rms 0
EDUCATION: B S E, Clwl Engineenng, Duke University, 1983
M S E, Water Resources, Umvers~ty of Texas at
Austin, 1985
PROFESSIONAL
TRAINING: "Unsteady Flow Modehng Using DAMBRK and
DWOPER," Umverslty of Texas at Austin, 1987
REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer, Texas #65045
Professional Engineer, Oklahoma #16255
Professional Engineer, Arkansas #8262
Professional Engineer, Louisiana #25581
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
1985.Present: Freese and N~chols, Inc
1990 - Associate
1994 - Principal
Mr Rutledge, a Pnnelpal of Freese and N~chols, serves as department
manager m the hrm's Drainage and Flood Management Department Mr
Rutledge ~s lexpenenced m hydrauhc and hydrologic studies as well as
design of water resource projects He has served as a project manager
and design coordinator for a number of dams and drmnage systems In
addition, he, has performed numerous hydrauhc and hydrologic studies,
including da~m breach analyses on e~ght major dams and Probable
Maxamum Flood studies for ex~stmg and proposed projects
Representative projects include:
Drainage and Flood Studies
· UpdateI of the PMF model of the SLX H~ghland Lakes Dams on the
Colorado River for the Lower Colorado R~ver Authority using the
National Weather Services dynam~c wave computer model,
NETWORK. The drainage areas of the reservoirs ranged from
19,350 io 26,340 square miles Over 600 miles of river were modeled
using the NETWORK model
E-1
EXHIBIT E
· ProJect Manager for the Cahbrat~on of the National Weather
Serwce's M~ss~ss~ppMlhnms-Mlssoun's DWOPER model utflmng the
1993 flood Included 250 miles of the M~sslss~pp~ Paver, 265 miles of
the Ilhnms Paver, and 100 miles of the Mlss~ss~pp~ Paver Purpose of
the study was to prepare data descn'b~ng the 1993 flood, including the
numerous levee breaches and perform the cahbrat~on of the model
Project Manager for design of $14 mflhon of drainage faclht~es
assocmted v~th a proposed runway at the Dallas-Fort Worth
International An'port and 404 pern~ttmg, ~ncludmg wetland m~tlgat~on
development
Breach analyses for e~ght major dams, including Morns Sheppard
Dam
Probable Mammum Flood analyses for Eagle Mountain Lake and
Lake Bridgeport for Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement
District No One, including the development of a flood routing model
for Lake Bridgeport and Eagle Mountmn Reservoir using the
DWOPER model for Tarrant County Water Control and
Improvement District Number One
Project Manager for the prehmmary design and permitting of a
channel dam and development of Johnson Creek for the Texas
Rangers, assocmted w~th the Ballpark at Arhngton Permits included
water rights, 404, and FEMA CLOMR
· Flood routing studies, ~nclud~ng the PMF, associated vath the design
of Palo Duro Reservoir for the Palo Duro Paver Authority
Flood routing studies, including PMF, for the Alan Henry Project for
the Brazos Paver Authority
· Flood routing studies, including PMF, for Maehell County Reservmr
for the Colorado Paver Munlmpal Water D~stnet
· Flood routing studies, lncludmg PMF, for the Durant Raw Water
Storage Reservoir for the C~ty of Durant, Oklahoma
· Preliminary design of the Belzora Landing Reservmr for the Sabine
Paver Authority, including flood studies using the Natmnal Weather
Sermce's DWOPER model
· Prehmmary design of the spillway system for the Cape
G~rardeau/Bolhnger County Recreation Reservmrs, ~ncludmg design
flood development
· Prehmlnary design of proposed modifications to Lake Arlington Dam
for the C~ty of Arhngton, including PMF flood studies using the
DWOPER model.
· Development of gate operating procedures for the proposed South
Bend Reservoir for the Brazos Paver Authority, Lake Bridgeport and
Eagle Mountain Reservoir for the Tarrant County Water Control and
Improvement District Number One, and Lake Conroe for the San
E-2
EXHIBIT E
Jaclnto River Authority The Lake Conroe project involved the
development of a computerized gate operating program tied to an
ex~stmg ALERT telemetry system of rainfall and lake level gages
· Early warmng system for 17 low water crossing of the C~ty of San
Antomo, including automated on-s~te warmng features
· Updated PMF Study on the Morns Sheppard Dam for the Brazos
R~ver Authority, utlhzmg the DWOPER model The drmnage area
of the dam ~s about 13,000 square miles
Project Manager for redesign of drainage channel adjacent to Harris
Hospital Northwest in Azle, Texas Work included a CLOMR from
· Project Manager for permitting and design of a 4 5 mile levee and
floodwall for the City of Dberty, Texas along the Tnmty River
· Project Manager for the Lower Neches Valley Authority canal
hydrauhe study usang the dynamm wave program, DWOPER
· Project Manager for the floodplain development perma for the
Carter Ranch for a levee m the floodplain of the Trm~ty River
Dam and Embankment Design
· Project Engineer for Palo Duro Dam for the Palo Duro R~ver
Authority
· Project Engineer for the Lake Alan Henry ProJect for the Brazos
River Authority
· Project Engineer for a raw water storage reservoir for the C~ty of
Durant, Oklahoma
· Project Manager and Project Engineer for the proposed Mitchell
County Dam for the Colorado R~ver Mumc~pal Water D~stnct
· Design of portions of S W Freese Dam for the Colorado R~ver
Mume~pal Water D~stnct
· Project Engineer for the feasibility study and prehm~nary design of
the proposed Belzora Landing Reservoir for the Sabine R~ver
Authority
· Project Engineer for the feasibility study and prehm~nary design of
recreational dam for Cedars Camps m M~ssoun
· Prehmmary design of the spillway system for the proposed Cape
G~rardeau/Bolhnger Counties (Missouri) Recreation Reservmrs
· ProJect Manger for Sulphur Springs Draw and Red Lake Dams for
Colorado River Mumc~pal Water D~strmt
· Project Manager for the design of an RCC Channel Dam ~n the
Sabine R~ver for the Sabine R~ver Authority
· Project Manager for the design of the 114 MG Terminal Storage
Reservoir for the C~ty of K~lgore
E-3
EXHIBIT E
· Project Manager for the design of 100 MG Terminal Storage
Reservoir for the Colorado Raver Mumclpal Water District
Fm~F.a~: - hm::HC:Xa Dam Inspect]onfRepmr
· Twenty dam safety inspections of major dams
· Project Engineer for the rehabilitation of Natural Dam for the
Colorado River Mumcipal Water District.
· Project Engineer for the rehabihtat]on of Little Fhnt Creek Dam for
Southwestern Electric Power Company
· Design of the emergency spillway and fuse plug as part of the Morns
Sheppard Dam Rehabilitation for the Brazos River Authority.
Project Manager for the design of the Morns Sheppard Stilling Basin
F_~ten$1on
· ProJect Manager for the repair of South Prong Dam for the City of
Waxahachie, which included a 1300' RCC overflow emergency
spillway
· Project Manager for the repair of the Hubbard Creek Spillway for
the West Central Texas Municipal Water District, wluch included
innovative conduit extension walls to prevent recurnng damage The
concept was developed through the use of a physical model study
Sedimentation Surveys
· Sedimentation surveys for Eagle Mountain Reservoir and Lake
Bridgeport for Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement
District No One
· Sedimentation surveys for Stryker Creek Lake for TU Electric
Water Resource Planning
· ProJect Manager on the preliminary design, permit appheatlon and
heanng process for Mitchell County Reservoir
· Project Manager for two feasibility studies revolving lnterbasm water
transfers through emstmg canal systems for the Sabine and San
Jacmto Raver Authontles and the Lower Neehes Valley Authority
· Project Manager for the long range water supply of a ten-county area
in central Texas
Construction Administration
· Resident Representative for the construction of the Richland-
Chambers Dam for the Tarrant County Water Control and
Improvement Dlstrmt Number One
· Resident Representative for the rehablhtatlon of Lattle Fhnt Creek
Dam, a slurry trench installation for Southwestern Electric Power
Company
E-4
EXHIBIT E
· Project'Engineer for the General Representation of Palo Duro and
Alan HenD, Dam Projects
· Project Manager for the General Representation of Mitchell County
Dam, Durant Raw Water Storage Reservoir, and Sulphur Spnngs
Draw Dams
· ProJect Manager for th~ General Representation of the Moms
Sheppard Stilling Basin Extension and Hubbard Creek Spillway
Repair
· Project Manager for the General Representation of the galgore
Tern'anal Storage Facility
· Project Manager for the General Representation of the South Prong
Dam Rehabilitation Project.
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES:
American Society of Clxal Engineers
National Society of Professional Engineers
Texas Society of Professional Engineers
AWARDSfltONORS.
Phi Beta Kappa
Chi Epsllon
Tau Beta Pi
Summa Cum Laude, Duke University
John A. Foeht Presidential Endowment Graduate Scholarship, University
of Texas
PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS'
"A Methodology for Calibration of Mannmg's Roughness Coefficients for
an Unsteady Flow Model," Masters Thesis, 1985
"Correction of Seepage Through an Earthfill Dam in Arkansas,"
co-authored vath Ronme M Lemons, presented to the Texas Section of
ASCE, Spring 1987
E-5
EXHIBIT E
"Correct~on of Seepage Through an Earthflll Dam," co-authored vnth
Ronme M Lemons and Bill R Elsbury of McClelland Engineers,
presented at the 16th Congress of the International Commission on Large
Dams, 1988
"Increasing Spillway Capacity to Allow Passage of the PMF at Moms
Sheppard Dam," presented at the 6th Annual Conference of the
Assoelatmn of State Dam Safety Officials, October 1989
"Natural Dam Emergency Repairs," co-authored wath Ronnle M Lemons,
presented at the Texas Seetmn of ASCE, Fall 1989
"Prehm~nary Report of the Feas~blhty of an Interbasln Water Transfer
Through Emstmg Canal Systems," co-authored wath Ronme Lemons,
presented at ASCE Water Resources Planning and Management D~ws~on,
17th National Conference, April 1990
"Use of a Hydrauhc Routing Model for PMF Development to Reduce
Conservatmn of Calibrated Empmcal Routing Methods," presented at
ASCE Water Resources Planmng and Management D~ws~on, 17th
Natmnal Conference, April 1990 and at the 12th Annual U S Committee
on Large Dams, April 1992
"Innovative Spillway Design," co-authored vath Dr J Paul Tulhs of Utah
State Umvemty, presented at the ASCE Hydrauhcs D~v~s~on, July 1990
"Rehabilitation of Dams for Planned Overtopping," co-authored w~th
Ronme M Lemons, P E and John R Kang, P E., presented at the 7th
Annual Conference of the Association of State Dam Safety Offimals,
October 1990
"Development of a Real-time Flood Forecasting and Spillway Gate
Operations Model," presented at the 4th Annual m~d-year techmeal
conference of the Texas Water Conservation Assoc~atmn, July 1991
"Lake Conroe Gate Operating Program," presented at the Texas Section
of American Water Resources, December 1992
"Use of NETWORK Flood Routing Model to Reduce PMF's at Lower
Colorado R~ver Authority Dams," presented at the ASCE WaterPower '93
Conference m Nashxqlle, TN ~n August 1993 and at the 10th Annual
Conference of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, October
1993
E-6
EXHIBIT E
"Use of Physical Hydrauhc Models for Spillway Rehabilitation," presented
at the Fourteenth Annual USCOLD Lecture Series, .lune 1994.
"Cahbratlon of M~sslss~pp~-Illlnols-M~ssoun River System for 1993 Flood,"
presented at the Annual Conference of the Assoemt~on of State Dam
Safet~ Officials, September 1994
"Determining Des~gu Floods More Accurately wnh State-of-the-Art
Computer Models," pubhshed an Hydro Review, Volume XIII, Number 6,
August 1994
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES'
Umted Way Annual Campmgn for Tarrant County, Secuon Chairman,
1988 to 1994; Division Chmrman 1994
Leadership Fort Worth
Board Member, Streams and Valleys
E-7
EXHIBIT E
Michael J. Dellies, P.E.
C:vd Engineer
YEARS EXPERIENCE: W~th Th~s Firm 11 W~th Other Firms: 0
EDUCATION: M S, Ovfl Eng~neenng, Umvers~ty of Texas at
Arhngton, 1994
B S, Clwl Englneenng, Texas Tech University, 1983
PROFESSIONAL
TRAINING: HEC-1 - Floodplain Hydrology, Umvers~ty of Texas,
1985
HEC-2 - Floodplain Hydrauhcs, Umvers~ty of Texas,
1985
International Symposium on Urban Hydrology,
Hydrauhc
Infrastructures and Water Ouahty Control, Umvers~ty
of Kentucky, 1985
Conference on Stormwater Management, Stormwater
Modehng, Flood Frequency Analys~s, and
Stormwater Detention, Texas A&M Umvers~ty,
1986
Intergraph Inroads Computer Software Seminar,
Huntsville, Alabama, 1989
WSPRO Water Surface Profile Computation
Seminar, 1993
Underground Detention Designs for Stormwater
Management, 1994
NPDES Stormwater Permit Comphanee, 1994
SWMM Model for Stormwater and CSO
Management, 1994
REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer, Texas #65938, 1989
Mr Delhes ~s an assocmte engineer and project manager for a number of
Freese and N~chols' civil engmeenng projects, meludmg floodwater
management studies, street and s~te drainage systems, municipal and
lndustrml master drainage plan development, sate grading plans, channel
~mprovement studies and designs, and detention pond designs Mr
Dellles has attended special tralmn8 seminars m stormwater management,
stormwater modehng, flood frequency analysis and stormwater detention
as well as ~n urban hydrology, hydrauhc infrastructures and water quahty
control
E-8
EXHIBIT E
Representat~v~ ~projects include:
ProJect Englneer for water Dwerslon study for the City of Grapevane
Effects of diverting drainage between adjacent watersheds was
evaluated
· Project Engineer for the development of a master drainage plan for
the City of Denton The project included development of storm
drainage criteria, drainage manual and a regional detention study for
the H~ekory Creek watershed
· ProJect Enl0neer for the development of a master drainage plan for
the C~ty of Grapexane The project mcluded estabhshmg GPS
monuments throughout the city, preparation of new topographic
maps, evaluating over 900 storm dram inlets and 500 storm dram
p~pe segments, and f~eld surveys to obtain over 475 cross sections for
development of 17 HEC-2 hydrauhc stream models covenng over 30
stream miles
· Project Engineer for detention pond and storm dram design to
provade flood m~t~gat~on m estabhshed neighborhood of Fort Worth
Assisted m development of the Clear Creek West Drainage Plan for
the C~ty of Copperas Cove The plan included hydrology and
hydrauhcs for the development of ~mproved storm drainage systems
throughout the watershed
· Project Manager/Engineer for the development of drainage studies
and plans and specd~cat~ons for storm dram ~mprovements ~n the
Park Place, Parra L~nda Estates and Placid Peninsula subdlwslons m
Grapexafie
ProJect Englneer for the design of street drainage for plant roadways
for Tnmty R~ver Authority Central Treatment Plant and American
Aarhnes maintenance faeflmes
· ProJect Engineer for the re-evaluation of all HEC-2 hydrauhc stream
models w~thm the C~ty of Abflene for the Federal Emergency
Management Agency flood insurance re-study
· Project Engineer for floodway reahgnment project for the C~ty of
Farmers Branch
· ProJect Engineer for floodplmn analys~s m connection vath Loyola
Lane Bridge ~mprovements for the C~ty of Austin
· Floodway/floodplain dehneat~on study for the City of Grapexane
· Floodplain reclamation for the City of Fort Worth
· Project Manager for flood abatement study of North P~ttman Creek
for the City of Plano
· Verlheat~on of floodway mapping m Sherman, Texas
· Master drainage plan for Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth
EXHIBIT E
S~te grading plan, floodplain reclamation design, and study of various
floodplain analyses to determine effects of development on adjacent
streams
~r=ss-r~c~:~s · Water and sewer systems relocations related to expansion of S.H 26
in Grapewne, Texas.
· Quanmy and cost estimates for several street unprovement projects
in Tarrant County
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES:
American Society of C~wl Engineers
National Society of Professional Engineers
Texas Society of Professmnal Engineers
HONORS AND AWARDS:
Chi Epsdon National C]wl Eng~neenng Honor Socmty
TSPE Young Enl0neer of the Year, 1994-95
PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS'
"Master Planmng Develops Solutions to Drmnage Problems and Rebmlds
Infrastructure Data Base," presented at the Texas Sect]on ASCE Spnng
Convent]on, Waco, Texas, April 1995
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES:
Arhngton Big BrothersfB]g Sisters
E-10
EXHIBIT E
Ronald G. King
Water Resources Engineer
YEARS EXI~ERIENCE: With This Firm 4 With Other F~rms 2
EDUCATION: B S Civil Eng~neenng, University of Texas at
Arlington, May 1991
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
1991.Present: Freese and N~chols, Inc, Eng~neer-~n-Tralnmg for
Water Resources Des:gn Department
Mr K~ng's experience includes work on several water resource studies and
design and construction projects
Representative projects include:
· Bay C~ty Dam - Project Engineer for preliminary des:eh of
modifications
· Gibbons Creek Dam - Project Engmeer for breach analys~s using
DAMBRK and annual safety mspect~ons
· SWEPCO - Project Engineer for annual and b~-annual :nspectlons of
power plant reservoir dams :n East Texas and Lou~smna.
· Project Engineer for the update of the PMF model of the SLX
I-I~ghland Lakes Dams on the Colorado River for the Lower
Colorado R:ver Authority using the National Weather Scrwce
NETWORK model The drainage areas ranged from 19,350 to
26,340 square miles Over 600 mdes of river were modeled using the
NETWORK model Also Project Eng:neer for dam stab:hty analys~s,
and physical hydrauhc model of the Buchanan seven-gate sp:llway
· Sulphur Springs Draw Dam - Project Engineer for prehm~nary and
final design, :nclud~ng all flood routing
South Prong Dam (Lake Waxahachle) - Project Engineer for
prehmlnary and final design and resident project representative for
construction
· Hubbard Creek Dam - Project Engineer for hydrauhc model of
spillway and final design of spillway rehabd~tat~on General
Representative for construction of spdlway rehabflnat~on Project
included construction of conduit extension walls and repmr of stllhng
basra flood dam for flood d~scharge stabilization
Project Engineer for the Cahbrat:on of the National Weather
Serv~ce's M~ss~sslpp:-Ilhno~s-M~ssourfs DWOPER model utilizing the
E-11
EXHIBIT E
1993 flood Included 250 miles of the Massassippi River, 265 miles of
the Ilhnoas River, and 100 miles of the Missouri river. Purpose o£ the
study was to prepare data descn"olng the 1993 flood, mcludmg the
numerous levee breaches and perform the calibration of the model
· Project Engineer for the update of. the Emergency Action Plan for
Lattle Flint Creek Dam near Gentry, Arkansas for Southwestern
Electric Power Company Included update of the dam breach model
usmg HEC-1 and DAMBRK, and compllataon of a plan in ease of
emergencies such as a breach
· Project engineer for the breach analysis of Longhorn Dam on the
Colorado Raver in Austin and Decker Dam on Decker Creek near
Austin, Texas DAMBRK was used to create the breach outflow
hydrograph and DWOPER was used to route the flood wave
downstream to the Caty of Bastrop
· Project engineer for the design of the flood control levee around the
Caty of Laberty, Texas. The levee vail be approximately $ miles on
the bluff between the city and the Tnnlty River floodplain, and roll
include a combination of earthf'fll levees and structural floodwalls
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES
American Society of C~vll Engineers
~I'ONORS AND AWARDS:
Chi Epsflon Nataonal Civil Engmeenng Honor Society
President, UTA Chapter, 1990-1991
Joe Rady Dlstmgmshed Senior Award, 1990-1991
Marvin C Nichols Paper Contest Award, 1994
E-12
EXHIBIT E
Curtis B. Beitel
Water Resources Engineer
YEARS EXPERIENCE: With Th~s F~rm 1 W~th Other F~rms 0
EDUCATION: B S C~wl Engmeenng, Texas A&M Umvers~ty, May
1993
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE'
1993.Present Freese and N~chols, Inc, Eng~neer-m-Trmmng for
Water Resources Design Department
1991-1993. Freese and N~chols, Inc, Cooperative Education
Posmon for Water Resources Design Department
Mr Beltel is an engmeer m the Water Resources Department
Representative projects include:
Project Engineer for the development of a levee algorithm for the
NWS operational model The levee model calculates both
overtopping and breach flows between the river and the levees
· Project Engineer for the Cahbrat~on of the National Weather
Senaee's M~ss~ss~pp~-Ilhno~s-M~ssoun DWOPER model uUhzmg the
1993 flood Included 250 miles of the M~ss~ss~pp~ Raver, 265 m~les of
the Ilhno~s Raver, and 100 miles of the M~ssoun river Purpose of the
study was to prepare data describing the 1993 flood, including the
numerous levee breaches and perform the cahbrat~on of the model
· City of San Antomo - Project Engineer for design of an Automated
Low Water Crossmg Warning System, to be momtored by an ALERT
telemetry system
· Edwards Underground Water D~strlct - ProJect Engineer for
prehmmary design of Indmn Creek Recharge Reservoir, ~ncludmg all
flood routing
· City of Arhngton - Project Engineer for the development of a flood
forecasting model for Lake Arhngton The model was developed for
use w~th a spreadsheet
· Developed several large hydrologic and hydrauhc computer models
of the Colorado Raver near Austm using the National Weather
Services' NETWORK The PMF update for the s~x H~ghland Lakes
Dams owned by the Lower Colorado Raver Authority utilized HEC-1
to model up to 26,000 square miles of drmnage area and NETWORK
to model over 600 miles of river channel
E-13
EXHIBIT E
· ProJect Engineer for the Cahbration of the National Weather
Semce's Mlsslssippl-Ilhnols-M~ssoun's DWOPER model utihzang the
1993 flood Included 250 miles of the Mississippi River, 265 miles of
the Ilhnms River, and 1~ miles of the M~ssoun river Pu~ose of the
study was to prepare data describing the 1~3 flood, Including the
numerous levee breaches and peffom the calibration of the model
* Sulphur Draw Dam - Conducted the prellmma~ feas~bfllW study
Developed ~o large lo.ran pro.ams for the study. ~so
pamc~pated ~n the dcs~ and construction representation
~ ~ke Wo~h Dam - Detemed the uplift forces on a RCC slab
overlay
* ~ke Ray Robe.s - Developed the ~al cost estimate for the $13
mflhon water treatment plant m Denton, Texas ~s was a detailed
cost estimate produced fora scratch on a spreadsheet
* ~ke Brazos Dam - ~s~sted in the prehmlna~ desl~ of
mod~flcatmns
Cl~ of Durant - ~Slsted ~th the quantities for the Durant Raw
Water Storage Resc~mr
PROFESSION~ SOCIE~ES:
~socmte Member - ~encan Soc~e~ of O~1 En~neers
COMPU'I~R EXPERIENCE.
Lotus, Symphony, Quattro Pro, Autocad, Harvard Graphics, M~crosoft
ProJect 1 0, Windows, WordPerfect 5 1, HEC-1, HEC-2, HMR-52,
DWOPER, KYPIPE, Fortran, VAX-VMS, HP 48SX, Applesoft Basic
HONORS AND AWARDS:
Chi Epsllon National Clwl Engineering Honor Society
Pledge Marshall, A&M Chapter, 1992-1993
Tau Beta P1 National Engmeenng Honor Society
Phi Eta Sigma National Freshman Honor Society
Dean's Honor Roll, Spnng 1992
Ill
E-14
CITY OF DENTON
August 17, 1995
Michael Delhes, P E
ProJect Manager
Freese and Nichols, lnc
811 Lamar Street
FortWorth, TX 76102
Dear Make
The City of Denton would hke to provide the following assurances to the Texas Water Development Board
for the 1995 Grant Apphcat~on
1 Tins planning effort is not duplicated m other City programs We have enclosed a copy of our CIP that
shows that some major funding is proposed m the two areas for structural nuprovements However, no funds
are programmed for an), studaes that master plan these two major drainage basins The only flood study
currently programmed Is for a Downtown Drainage Planmng Study for 1997-98 wnh a total of $60,000
programmed Tins does not anver PEC-4 but concentrates on the mare branch and north branch of Pecan
Creek as,they flow through the Central Busmess Dasmct
2 The C!ty of Denton is connmtted to pursue wable soluUens that result fi.om these stuches and plsnmng
efforts The enclosed CIP shows Denton's eommatment to funding structural maprovemants but not
adequately funding master planning stuthes for these two regmnal basins
3 The City of Denton has an excellent lustovy vath the FAA and others of meeting its reqmred level of
participation m grants that reqmre City matcbang funds The City of I)enton wall meet its obhgaUon using
General Fund Revenues or Bond Funds depending on the amount and t~rmng of the matcbang funds
4 The City of Denton is currently at Level Nme m the Commumty Rating S3 stem of the Nataoual Flood
Insurance Program Our flood plato management and subchvislon regulauon ordinances exceed the mmunum
requirements slgmficantly Our commumty number is 480194 David Salmon ~s the current flood plato
admmastrator
Finally, all the land areas to be studied are e:ther m the City of Denton or :ts Extraterntonal Sunsdictlon The
PEC-4 basra Is m the central pomon of the incorporated area and 90% plus of the Cooper Creek basra ~s
mslde the C:ty Lmuts
If you need further lnformat;on, please adws¢
Sincerely,
JDlr~to~r o ~and Transportation
CITY OF DENTON
August 24, 1995
Jack Wagu~-
Actmg D~rector of Publm Works
Denton County Pubhc Works Department
306 N Loop 288
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Mr Wagner
The Cxty of Denton ~s subnuttmg a grant apphcat~on to the Texas Water Development Board for Flood
proteeaon plaunmg The grant vnll address two regional areas that are wathm the jurls(hcaon of your poht~cal
body They are as follows,
1 Cooper Creek Regmnal Detentmn Tlus project will study and prowde potentml regmnal detentmn ponds
on Cooper Creek to address eyastmg and future flooding ~ssues
2 Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 Flow D~verslon M]t]gataon\Channel Improvements This project vail study
and prowde structural channel and culvert unprovements recommendaUons along the branch of Peean Creek
that runs from the northeast comer of UNT to Ruddell through Southeast Denton
Please be adxased that the recommendataons proposed will be prowded to you for your input and mformat~on
during flus plaunmg process Any comments or concerns that you have would be forwarded to the C~ty of
Denton and Mr Craig Pederson at the Texas Water Development Board I would be happy to discuss the
apphcaUon w~th you at any tune ffyou desire
Sincerely,
J~ Clark,/P E
D~reetor of Engineering and Transportation
Z 772 284 795
I. your ]~I~L~)]~=~.~ oompleted on the rever~e elde?
~ Recmpt for I ~ ~" ......
~ Ce~,f,ed Ma,I
Sla and ZiP Code
~enton~ TX 76201
~111~
TWDBF Grant Applscat~
Letter
I
_ ~ ...... g~ ~_ tnJ~eelpt ~e~e.
CITY OF DENTON
DENTOI~ 7X 76~0 I
August 24,, 1995
Dr Albert Thomas, PHD
Superintendent of Schools
Denton Independent School District
1307 N Locust
Denton, TX 76201
Dear Dr Thomas
The City of,Denton ~s subnuttmg a grant apphcatlon to the Texas Water Development Board for Flood
protection plamung The grant will address two regional areas that are within thejuns&ctlon of your poht~cal
body They are as follows,
1 Cooper Creek Regional Detention Ttus project will study and provide potentml regional detention ponds
on Cooper Creek to address eyastmg and future flooding issues
2 Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 Flow D~vers~on M~t~gataon\Channel Improvements Tlus project will study
and provldelslXuctural channel and culvert nnprovemcnts recommendauons along the branch of Pecan Creek
that runs fi.om the northeast corner of UNT to Ruddell through Southeast Denton
Please be adwsed that the recommendations proposed will be provided to you for your input and mfonnatmn
during flus planning process Any comments or concerns that you would have would be forwarded to the City
of Denton and Mr Crm§ Pedersen at the Texas Water Development Board I would be happy to &scuss the
apphcation with you at any tune if you desue
Smeerely, ~
D~reetor of Engmeenng and Transportation
Z 772 284 793
Receipt for
Certified Maml layour RETURN ADDRESS completed on the reveme side
,~{~ ~,~f~ Do not uae for lnternational Mafl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
{See Reverse) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Dr. Albert Thomas, PH~ ~ ~
'~'lreetandNo 0 ~ 0 ~ ~
1307 N Locust = ~o = ~
Denton, TX 76201 ~ ~ · ~
Return R,Celp~ Showing to Whom O ~
August 24, 1995 ~M~ ~
TWDBF Grant Applmcat~ n ~ ~ m
Letter ~ ~ ~ ~
Thank ~u~o~ u~l~ Return Receipt
1996-2000 CAI~ITAL' IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
[
1995-96 BUDGET CALENDAR
January 17 - Tuesday Du~a~oa of Pnontaes Que~onnatre vath C:ty Council
~ C~ty Co~mefl briefing oa Capital Improvement Program
. January 20 - Friday Pnonty Quesao~na~re ehslnbuted to C~ty Counal
Sanuaty 27 -Fnday C~ty Coeaefl returas Budget Pnonty Que~onaan'e
.~ February 7 - Tuesday Re'aew and &seus~non of Budget Priority Quesaonnatre results w~th C~ty Council
Pubh¢ Ulihties Board and Plamung and Zoning Comm~.ss~on hold a pubh¢ heanng to
February 8 - Wedaesday receive input from the e~amumty regarding Capital Impwvemeat Program
~'] February 22 - Wednesday Staff Capital Improvemeat Prosram Budget kickoff
~i] March 10 -Fnday Captial Improvement Program requests due m Budget Office for rewew and analysas
Mar~h 15 - Wednesday Oeneral Goverameat fi/th year Capatal Improvement requests are presented to Execuuve
~ Commatiee for eonadenmoa
{-~ March 20 - Monday Exeeuttve ComrmUee r,,,,knngs of capital unpwvement pro~eets due to Budget Office
March 23 - Thtu-'~,day Executive Commatlee chscusston of capital unprovement project priority ranlaugs
April 5 - Wednesday Pubhe Utlht~es Board reeaves prehnunary draft of Utahtiea Capflal Improvement
April 7 - Friday Execuuve Committee re, news General Government requests fonnulatm$ recorameadauon
m be forwarded to Plsuamg and Zomng Comnusaou
April 26 - Wednesday Pubhc Utlllt~e~ Boant holds a work se~aon to review UtflRies Capflal Improvement
May 3 - Wednesday Pubhe Utilities Board final Utility Capital Improvement Program recommendatiou
May l 0 - Wednesday Plannm{~ and Zoom! Cornm~saton discusses the Capital Improvement Program
"~ May 24 - Wednesday Plamung and Zomn$ Comnussaon holds a pubh¢ heanng tn a specaal meetm$, and
.~ June 6- Tuesday Recommtmded five-year Cap~tal Improvement Program presented to City Council for
cous~derat~on.
September 12 - Tuesday City Council adopts Capital Improvement Program budget (first year of Capital
Improvement Prosram)
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
prelect Title ~ ~ MISCELLANEOUS STREET RECONSTRUC'rlON
~a cun'ont ClP Pro, Ct? ~ Yes _~X No
Prolact Description/Location
econstruct~on would include new asphalt pavement by bomagg;ng and
Use C t7 forces to reconstruct ex~stmg streetS,, ~R~ r~nmrRd as needed Staff would recommend streets and dec;drag body
overlaymg Concrete curbs and dnveways wi u=
would choose
Pro~ect Purpose/Justification
Many streets ~n Denton have secttons that are tn poor repair but not the whole street Also, some streets have poor asphalt
condlttons, but curb and gutter are acceptable Enables selection of specific malor street repairs the actual year of the program
COAftructlOA FUAAfAff 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Tot~
~d~e (~1,000'S] ~ ~ 0
Bonds - ,ssue 0
AuthonzedlUmssued Bonds 150 150
UnauthonzedlUmssued Bonds 0
A,d m Const;uctton 0
Other ~ 0 ~ 150
Tot~ 0 0 0
~ Fu~ 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998 99 1999~ Tot~
~= 8 8
Se~,ces 142 142
Land (R~ght of~way) 0
Constructton 0
Other ~ 0 150 1 ~0
Tot~ 0 0 0
O~atl~ Budget 1998-99 1999~0 Torn
o
0
Supphes 0
Mamtenance 0
Se~iceS 0
Debt Se~Lce 0
insurance 0
F~xed Assets ~ 0 0
Total 0 0 0
me IlK e~M s=ce of opting f~ds.
~ ~ ~ ~No
~ - ~--~ Yes, approx;mate amount annually.
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project TitJe ~ MAYHILL/LOOP 288 CONNECTOR ROAD
Project#o, ,, <,, 0010-132 [Montie~ar).~ ~ 'aid COP~ Completed
ReqttsStlng Dept. Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Feb-00 Apr-00
Estimated Coct $776,000 End Jan-00 Mar-00 Aug-00
Is this mt update or revision of 8 current CIP Project?
Project Description/Location
Construct a 45'-w~de road w~th curb and gutter hnk~ng Mayhdl Road wKh Loop 288 just south of Russell-Newman plant
Prolect includes traffic signal at Loop 288 for $100,000
Project Purpose/Justification
Prowde alternative access to Billy Ryan H~gh School, and potentially, the Denton County Government Center located on Market
Street Would also prowde potential access to FEMA Would reduce congestion at McKmney and Loop 288 and could
eliminate some dangerous dnveway maneuvers
Cons~'u~gon Fun~ng
Schedule f~1.000'$) 1996-96 1996-B7 1997-98 !99B.99 19994)0 Total
Ex~st~ng Bonds - issue 0
Authonzed/Umssued Bonds 0
Unauthonzed/Unissued Bonds 776 77§
A~d m Construction 0
Other 0
Total 0 0 0 0 776 776
Con~uucfon Fund/n~
Costs f~l, O00'$i 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998.99 1999-00 Total
Services 131 131
Land (R~ght-of-way) 0
Construction ~45 545
Other 100 100
Total 0 0 0 0 776 776
Operating
Costs (~1,000's) 1995-96 1996 97 1997-98 1998-99 19994)0 Total
Personal Services 0
Supphes 0
Mmntenance 0
Services 0
Debt Service 0
insurance 0
F~xed Assets 0
Total 0 0 O 0 0 0
Please list expected source of operating funds
WIll this project result In eny savings? __ Yes, approximate amount annually X No
30A9
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CONCRETE DRAINAGE CHANNELS
~LANEOUS .......
Feb 00
~ent CIP Project? ? ~X No
Vanous locations in Denton Make major repmrs to ex~stmg concrete channels Select,on of specific tocatmns to be made pnor
to destgn/b~ddmg process Staff to provtde input and recommendations to selecting body
--~ect Purpose/Justification
Many ex~sttng concrete channels are broken up or severely cracked Amounts required to make these repatrs ~s above what
operating budget will support Plan ~s to make repairs m order to avoid hawng to completely rebutld later
Consm~eEdn FU~[rig~ 1995-96 1996.97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total
0
Ex~st~ng Bonds - ~ssue _ .- 0
AuthonzedlUn~ssued Bonds 125 ~ 25
Ur~uthonzedlUmssued Bonds 0
A~d m Constructmn 0
Other' 0 125 ~ 25
Tota{ 0 0 0
Const~uCtlo~ Futtdlng 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 199B-99 1999 O0 Totat
Cos~ [~1,000',~}~ 12 2
Services 0
Land (R~ght-of-wa~) 113 113
Construction 0
Other 0 125 125
~ Total 0 0 0
Operating 81ud~et 1998-99 1999-00 Totat
Costs (~?.000~$) 1995-96 1996 97 1997-98
0
Personal Services 0
Supphes 0
Maintenance 0
Sew~ces 0
Debt Se~ice 0
Insurance 0
Rxed Assets 0 0
~ Total 0 0 0 0
Plon~e fist expe;ted source of operating funds
y savings? Yes, approximate amount annually
~996-2000
~..~, P. rk Parki~ Lot Pavt~ r
,,
' ~ ~ ~ ~ 10/~ 1~/98 0~/~
p~J~t ~rJ~J~L~t Jm
This proJ~t w~ll provl~ for the assail
Mack, D~I8, o~ North Lakes ~rks
P~j~t ~JatJfl~tle
ThlS proj~t MILL pro~ . higher ~[ity of ~rk)~ surface for the ~ers as ~i[ 8s ~a~e
the .esther{cs of the
~ 1~-~ 1~ 1~ ~, ,1~ 1~ Total
Ex~stl~ B~ - ~8s~ 0
AuthorizN~tss~ B~8 0
~neuthorl zN/UnlSS~ B~s 500 500
A~d Jfl C~cr~tl~ 0
0
Other
Total 0 0 0 0 500 500
Serv~c~ 40
Le~ (Right-of-way)
;~tr~t{~ 0
Other
Total 0 0 0 0 500
0
Parsul Services
o
S~L I es
Total 0 0 0 0 2
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
l~r_nj~c_-~ Title MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS
~ ~: ~' 0010-B7 ~ ~ ~) ~ ,,D~lgn 8Id Co~ ~m~et~
....
~g;Dept, ~ Eng~neenng & Trans n
~ / Jan 00 Mar-00 Jun-00
~t~ C~t ~ 219,000
~ DescHptlonlLoc~lon
~oject traffic control signals at ~o intersections to be determ~d ~n the prolect year
Pr~e~ Purpose/Justlflc~lon
~owde stgnafizatl~n at tntersect;ons on an as-needed bBs~s
~_~ ,[~ ?, 00~) .... 199~6 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999~0 T~
~st~ng Bonds - ~ssue 0
A~honzed/Umssued Bonds 0
U~uthor~zed/Un~ssued Bonds 219 219
A~d m Construction
~er 0
Total 0 0 0 0 219 219
C~ (~1~O00's) 199~96 1996-97 1997-98 1998 99 1999~0 Tot~
Sew~ces 37 37
~nd (R~ght of-way) 2
Co~truct~on 180 180
~ 0
Other
; Tot~ 0 0 0 0 219 219
~atlnE
~ (~I,000'~) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999~0 To~
Personal Sew~ces; 0
Sup~hes 0
Mamtenance 0
Seduces 0
Debt Sewlce 0
I~urance 0
~m~ Assets 0
~ Tot~ 0 0 0 0 0 0
'~-- ~ ~e list expe~ source of oper~ng funds
I
1
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project Title PACE DRIVE DRAINAGE
Projeat #~ ~ 0810-69 tMont/l/'Yemr) '~ ~ ...... ~ C~r~ct, Co~i~d'
Requesting Dept. Englneenng & Trans Begin J 0ct-99 Feb-O0 Apr-00
Estimated Co~t: $953,000 End ~ Jan-O0 Mar 00 Sap-00
Is this an update or revision of a currant ClP Project? __ Yes X No
Project Description/Location
Construct a hned channel from the south end of Pace Drive south to McKinney Street New box culverts under McK;nney
Street and grass channel south of McKmney Street
Project Purpose/Juatlfication
Th~s entire area has exceptionally flat topography and floods during heavy rains Several homes have reported flooding Severe
water damage to one home on the south s~de of McKmney Street
Construction Fur, ding
Schedule f~?,O00'$) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total
Exmt~ng Bonds - ~ssue 0
Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0
Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 953 953
A~d ~n Construction 0
Other 0
Total 0 0 0 0 953 953
Costs(*l,0OO's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total
Sarwces 153 153
Land (Right-of-way) 50 50
Construction ~50 750
Other 0
Total 0 0 0 0 953 953
Operating Budget
Costs [~1,000'sJ 1995-96 1996 97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total
Personal Services 0
Supphes 0
Mamtenance 0
Serwces 0
Debt Serwce 0
Insurance
F~xed Assets 0
o
Total 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0
Please list expected source of operating funds I
Will this project result In any savings? __ Yes, approximate amount annually }{ No
3o78
1~96-2000
~~k Ba~Lftetd L~gh~t~ .~
Is ~J8 m te ~ ~isim ~ a ~t ClP Pm ~ y~ x Mo
Thts pro]~ Mill aL~ for the ~tghC~ o~ ~he 3 C~-~LL f~eL~ L~aC~ a~ Evers Park
p~j~t ~/J~tjft~t1~
p~ov3~ a h~he~ ~ttty service for y~th
0 0
Ex~stln9 Bo~:l~ - Is~ 0 0
Author I z~/Unt
u~hort z~/UnJSS~ Bo~s 0
A~d in C~tr~ti~l 0 0
other 0
Totm[ 0 0 0
Settees 0 0
L~ (R~ght-of-way)~ 67
Other 0
Tota[ 0 0 0
services o o
Se~J ces 0 0
O~t ServJce 0 0
FJx~ Asset~ 0
Toter 0 0 0
CJW of O~t~ G~ra~ F~ ~ratJ~ B~et
~01FSF/Btank
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project Title PECAN CREEK KERLEY TO MORSE
Requesting Dept Englneenng & Trans I Begin I Oct~99 Mar-O0 May-00
Estimated Cost $496,000 [ End I Feb-00 Apr-00 Dec-00
Is thio an update o~ revision of · current ClP Project? ~ Yas _~L No
Project Dascrlptlon/Locaflon
and the Woodrow Lane bndge w~ll be ~mproved ut~hzmg appropnate channel lining and
Pecan
Creek
between
Kerley
Street
culvert Improvements
Project Purpose/Justification
The existing channel has severe capacity problems including all crossings and is not mmntamable which restricts flow rates
· chedule [ti1,000'$) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 19994)0 Totat
Ex~st~ng Bonds - ;ssue
Authonzed/Umssued Bonds
Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 496 496
A~d ~n Construction
Other
Total 0 0 0 0 496 496
Constt*uc~fon Funding
Costs (~l,000's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997~q8 1998-99 1999-00 Total
Services 84
Land (R~ght-of-way) 2
Construction ~-10 41
Other
Total 0 0 0 496 496
Operating Budget
Cost~ {Jt1,0OO's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total
Personal Services
Supphes
Maintenance
Services
Debt Service
insurance
Fixed Assets
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Please list expected source of operating funds
Will this project result In any savings? ,,, Yes, approximate amount annually ~ No
2E73
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
P,.,roject Title KERLEY STREET CULVERT ~ --------------
~'..';,,-'JVYear) Desl§n Bid Construct Completed
- o , Begin Oct 99 Feb 00 Apr-00
-- =jtt~c[ C~t $130,000 I End Jan-00 Mar-00 Jul-00
-'~ect Description/Location
Install new multiple box culverts under Kertey Street lust west of Minor Court
~floatlon
Ex~stmg multiple 36 tach p~pes are inadequate to carry storm water runoff House at the corner of Kelley and Minor has flooded
on several occasions
1995-96 1996-97 1997.98 1998-99 1999-00 Torn
0
Bonds - ~ssue 0
Authonzed/Un~ssued Bonds 130 130
Unauthonzed/Un~ssued Bonds 0
A~d m Construction 0
Other 130 130
~ Total 0 0 0 0
~uc~°n ~F,_u~I?,rig< 199~-96 1995.97 1997-9~ 1998-99 1999-00 Total
Costs (~,000'~) ~ 22 22
Services 2 2
Land (R;ght-of-way) ~ 06 106
Constructton 0
Other 130 130
r Total 0 0 0 0
Budget 1998 99 1999-00 To'cai
Costs (~1~OOCl's) 1995.96 1996-97 1997-98
0
Personal Serv;ces 0
Supplies 0
Maintenance 0
Services 0
Debt Service 0
Insurance 0
FixedAsset~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
operatlng funds
__ v... a..,ox,mate amoun, annual,¥ __ ______________
AAAO3OTB
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project Title OPTICOM SYSTEM
ProJec~ ~>,~,~,,:,,,, 0010-134 fMolYf;Jrl/YearJ\.~:~ [ltd
Requesflng~Dept. Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Jan-O0 Mar-O0
Estimated Co.to $50,000 End Dec-99 Feb-00 May-O0
Is this an update o~ revision of a current ClP Project? Yes X No
Project Description/Location
Equip up to 10 s~gnahzed intersections w~th an opt~com system
Project Purpose/Justification
Aliowc emergency vehicles to control traffic s~gnals by remote control Reduce response t~mes and provides safety to other
motorists
Const~ctton FunCflng
Schedule (;t1,000'$) 1995-96 1996 97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total
Ex~st~ng Bonds ~ssue 0
Authonzed/Umssued Bonds 0
Unauthonzed/Unlssued Bonds 50 50
Aid ~n Construction 0
Other 0
Total 0 0 O 0 50 50
Costs (;tl,000's) 1998-96 1996-97 1997~98 1998-99 1999-00 Total
Services 5 5
Land (R~ght-of-way) 0
Construction ~ 45 45
Other 0
Total 0 0 0 0 50 50
Operatln~ Badger
Costs (;1,000's) 1995.96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total
Personal Services 0
Supplies 0
Maintenance 0
Services 0
Debt Service ~ 0
Insurance 0
F~xed Assets 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Please list expected source of operating funds
Will this project result In any savings? __ Yes, approximate amount annually X No
30B8
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project Title SHADY OAKS DRAINAGE ~__Comp/e
Re~'est~g Dept. Englneenng & Trans Begin Dec-99 Apr-O0 Jun 00
'F.~t~alated Co~t 15939,000 End Mar-00 .L May-00 L.Oct oo
isL~.s--;-~-~ updste o-'r~evlrevlalon of a current CIP Project? ~ Yes ~ No
Project DescdptlonlLooctlon
Construct underground drainage and hned channel from Dallas Dnve to Duncan Street w~th p~pes to Hdl and Sm*th Streets w~th
mtets
Project PurposelJustlflcstlon
Reduce drainage problems and enhance Willow Springs drmnage prolect completed m 1991 and Chambers Street Drainage
constructed m 1995 Will also reduce development costs of property between I 35E and Dallas Dnve
Consl/uct[on Fundln~ 1999-00 Total
.~,_L~.uie (~l, 000?)r,, 1995~96 1996-97 1997-98 199B-99
Existing Bonds - ~esue 0
~,uthonzed/Un~ssued Bonds 939 939
Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 0
A~d ~n Constructmn 0
Other
Total 0 0 0 0 939 939
Co~tructfon FUnd~g 1999-00 Total
~'~ (~l, 000's) 1991~9l~ 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99
~ 159 159
Services 5 5
Land (R~ght of-way) 775 775
Constructmn 0
Other
Total 0 0 0 0 939 939
Operating Budget ~ Total
r~e~. (;t?,OOO'sj 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 0
Personal Services 0
Supplies 0
Maintenance 0
Serwces 0
Debt Service 0
Insurance 0
Fixed Assets ~ '
ctal ---- o
WIR this pr~ect result In any savings? ~ Yes, eppri~lmate amount annually.
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project Title WELCH AT HIGHLAND RIGHT-TURN LANE
Requesting Dept Engmeenng & Trans Begin Oct-99 Jan-O0 Mar-O0
Estimated Cost $23,000 End Dec-99 Feb-O0 May-00
Is this an update or revision of · current CIP Project? __ Ye~ X No J
Project DescHptlonlLocaflon
Construct a right turn lane on southbound Welch onto H~ghland Street UNT has committed to dedicate necessary right-of-way
Project Pu~poselJustlflcatlon
H~ghland Street has h~gh bus use due to UNT drop-off Will help get busses off of Welch Street more easily and ~mprove traffic
flow
Consb'~t/on Funding
Schedule (~1,000'$) 1995.96 1996.97 1997.98 1998-99 1999~0 T~
~st~ng Bonds - ~ssue 0
Authonzed/Un~ssued Bonds 0
Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 23 23
A~d ~n Construction 0
Other 0
TotN 0 0 0 0 23 23
~on Fu~ng
~s (~?,O00's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997.98 1998-99 1999~0 Torn
Sew~ces 3 3
Land (R;ght-of-way) 0
Construction ,20 20
Other 0
Total 0 0 0 0 23 23
O~atlng ~et
~st~ (~l,000'sJ 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999~0
Personal Se~ces 0
Supplies 0
Mamntenance 0
Seduces 0
In,ur*nco 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
prbject Title ROSELAWN PAVING ANO DRAINAGE {BERNARD TO EMETERY)
01/00 ~ o3/ou I 06~00 I 08~00
~e ~ re~l.l~ of a cu~t CIP Pr~? ~ y~ ~ No
Reconstruct Roselawn Drive from Bernard Street to cemetery entrances as a 24 foot estate section road Would include proper
croSs drainage and driveway culverts
I~'o~ect Purpose/Justifloatlon
Ex~stmg road ~s very narrow and the pavement ~s ~n poor condition Prowdes main access to Roselawn Cemetery Th~s prolect
is tn response to ctuzen request
~ Fm~lr~~ ~ 1998-99 1999.00 Total
$ct~le (#1,000'$) 1996.96~~ 1996-97 1997-98 ~
ExistJng Bonds - ~ssue, ,. 0
AuthonzedlUn~ssued ' Bonds 664
Unauthonzed/Un~ssued Bonds 0
A~d in Construction 0
Total 0 0 0 0 664 664
Costs (;}%,O00's) ! 99E,96~~ 1996-97 1997-98 199B-99 1999-00 Total
~ -------"-- ~ ~ ~ 112 112
Services ' 20 20
Land (R{ght-of-way) $32 532
~ Total 0 0 0 0 664 664
- ~dget 1998 99 1999-00 Total
Cests ftl, OOO's/ ~ 1996-96 1996-97 1987.98
0
Personal Services 0
Su~hes 0
Mmntenance 0
Services 0
Debt Sew~ce 0
Insurance 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
_ _
---
g funds
-----
~y savings7 Yes, appm)amate amount annually
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project Title WEST WINDSOR DRIVE PAVING (OPTION 2)
ProJe~-'t ~,,, 0010-8S ..... fMeet&~w] ~ vDe~l~ Bid Co~t ~ ~,
R~B O~t, Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Mar~O May 00
~ C~t ~439,000 ~d Feb.0 Apr-00 Sop 00
Is thls ~ u~cte ~ revision of a current ClP Proje~? ~ Yes X No
Pr~e~ D~ptlonlLoc~on
~pand ~st~ng W~ndsor to 4 lanes from Bonnie Brae to the recreation center and w~den the 2-lane section from there to Hmkl
Project PurpoaalJ ustlflcctlon
Provide better and safer access to North Lakes Park and the surrounding neighborhoods
Co~.s~*uctlon Fundin~
Schedule (;t1,000~$) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 TOtM
Existing Bonds * issue 0
Authonzed/Umssued Bonds 0
Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 439 439
A~d m Construction 0
Other 0
Total 0 0 0 0 439 439
Conatruct~o~? Fu~g
Co~t~ (~1.000'$) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total
Services 74 74
Land (R~ght-of-way) 0
Construction ~65 365
Other 0
Total 0 0 0 0 439 439
Operat/r~ Budget
C05t3 (.~I, 000'~) 1995-96 1996 97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total
Personal Services 0
Supplies 0
Maintenance 0
Services 0
Debt Service~ 0
Insurance 0
Fixed Assets 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Please list expected source of operating funds
Will this project result in any savings? Yes, approximate amount annually ~( No
ZEOE
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
ProjeCt Title RANCH ESTATES DRAINAGE
'~ [~* · ~ ' Begin Nov 99 Apr-00 Jun-00
; '¥"%.~:'~ ~ * ' ' J. Mar-00 May-O0 L.Dec oo b_.
,5 7,ooo
~ update ~-~evlsinn of a curt'eot C~rojact? ~ Yes ~ No
~"~'~ D *$ crlptlorl/L O( ~--~'-'~
IJnad channel from Hampton Drwe to Hwy 3S0 w~th new cuiverts under Hwy ~80 and grass lined channel south of Hwy
$5,000 for processing a Letter of Map rews;on d~rough FEMA
Project puq3osa/Jusflflcatlon
Will solve a Iocahzed flooding problem end remove several homes from t~e floodptsm There are several i~stsncss of wa~e;
entenng homes
ConstrUct~n F~n~, Teta
$cMffuM~[;tl,000~$)~ ~< ~ 1995-~96~ 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999,00
Ex~stmg Bonds - issue 0
~,uthorlzed/Umssued Bonds 517 517
Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 0
A~d ~n Construction 0
Other
Total 0 0 0 0 517 517
Services 15 15
Land (R~ght-of-way) 409 409
Construction 5 5
Other
Total 0 0 0 0 517 517
Operating Judger 1998-99 1999~00 Total
~*~+~(~1,000,'$J 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98
Personal Serv;ces 0
Supphes 0
Maintenance 0
Services 0
Debt Serv~se 0
insurance 0
Fixed Assets
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
[ Will this ixoject r~ult in any ~avings? ~ Yes, approximate amount annually
AAAO2E71
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Proje"ct~l~ltle~,' NORTH LAKES PARK EXPANSION
Requee~ DeptJ~ ~ Parks & Recreatmn Begin 09~98 02~99 04~99
Estimated:Coat $1,500,000 End 02/99 04/99 01/00 01/00
Is this an update m' revision of a current CIP Project? Yes ~ No I
Project Desc~lptJon/Locctlon
Th~s proJeot wdl allow for the expansmn of approx:matel¥ 20 acres at North Lakes Park Th:s expanston w~ll ~nclude addmonal
soccer fields, parking, restrooms, and support fac:ht~es
Project Purpose/Justification
Th~s prolect w~ll allow the Parks and Recreation Department to keep up w~th the growth ~n youth athletics
ConsU'uc~n Fur, dl~
$cbadule~f;tl,00~*$) 1995.96 1996-97 1997~8 1998.99 ~1999-2000
~st~ng Bonds - ~ssue 0
Authonzed~mssued Bonds 0
Unauthonzed~n~ssued Bonds 1,000 1,000
Aid m Constructron 500 500
Other 0
Torn 0 0 0 0 1,500 1,500
Co~n F~ ~ :
Co~s (tl,000'~) 199~96 1996-97 1997~8 ~998-99 1999-~00 TO~
Saw,cas 150 150
Land (R~ght~f-way) 0
Construction 1 ,~50 1,350
Other 0
TCt~ 0 0 0 0 1,500 1,500
O~raE~
Costs MI,0OO's) 2000~1 1996-97 1997~8 1998.99 1999-2000 To~
Personal Saw,cas 44 44
Supphes 6 6
Maintenance 26 26
Sew~ces 30 30
Debt Se~ce 0
Insurance 0
F~xed Assets 0
Torn 106 0 0 0 0 106
Please Ust expe~ source of operating funds
C~ty of Denton General Fund Operating Budget
~11 this proje~ result In ~y savings? ~ Yes, approximate amount annually X No
2EOA
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
e Facd~W
Project Title Construct Fuel Stora
project # 0019-004 !~_.~t__ ~Yw) Design W ~ ~m~t~
R~g D~t. A~rpo~ ~ 1999 1999 1999 1999
~t~ C~t ~488 1999 1999 1999 1999
~s ~ u~e M re~l~ of a ~t ClP ~ ~ y~ ~ No Rev~smn
~ Descdpfl~lL~ Per Master ~an
Con~ruct Fuel Storage Fac~hW
~t Pur~selJue~
To meet E P A requtrements by removing undergro~ ~orage tanks
1 a9 2000
~..__._ 1996-97 199~8 1998-99
~lst~nO Bonds - ~ssue 0
~uthorlzed~n~ssued Bonds 0
Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 0
A~d in Construction 488
Ot~r 488 488
TotM
~ F~ 1999-20~ To~
~ (~1,000'~i I~E 199~97 1997-98 1998-99
Se~tces
~ (Right~f way)
Construction
Other
TotM
~* f~1,000'~) 1995-9~ 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-20~; To~
Perso~l Sewlces
Supplies
Seduces
Debt Sew~ce
F~xed Assets 488
TotM
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ my s~? ~ y~ ~-ox~ amount annually X,_ No
1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project Title MASCH BRANCH ROAD PHASE I
Task $~liedufe ~
Projeet~' 0010 73 (Month/Year) ~ ,J~, Bid ~ / Completed
Requesl~ng Dept Engmeenng &Trans Begin 0ct-99 Mar-00 May-00
Estimated Co~t $847,000 End Feb-O0 Apr 00 Mar-01
Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? Yes ~ No ]
Project Description/Location
=rov~de 27 foot road between Hwy 380 and J~m Christal Road including drmnage and curb and gutter
- ~roject Purpose/Justification
=rowde ~mproved access to 380 from industrial area around the A~rport
Co~n Funding
Schedule (;tl,000'S) 1999-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999,00 Total
Ex~st~ng Bonds - ~ssue 0
Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0
Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 847 847
A~d in Construction 0
Other 0
Total 0 0 0 0 847 847
ConstrucEon Funding
Costs (,~1,000's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 TotaJ
Serwces 75 75
Land (R~ght-of-way) 64 64
Construct;on 708 708
Other 0
Total 0 0 0 0 847 847
Operating Budget
Costs (;l,000's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999~)0 Total
Personal Serwces 0
Supphes 0
Mmntenance 0
Services ~ 0
Debt Service 0
Insurance 0
F~xed Assets 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Please list expected source of operating funds
Will this project result In any savings? Yes, approx;mate amount annually. X No
30A9
0000000~
0
08-31-95 06 31AM FROM FREESE & NICHOLS TO 915124639893///95195 P001/003
4055 Intem~onal Plaza, Suite 200, FozL Worth, Texas 76109-4895
817/735-7300 FAX 817/7357491
Fnis $=- N~c FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET
~,~l~t,.~u.TO: GORDON THORN
, FAX NO.: (~12~ 483-g893
Co,',.
M~,-- DATE: Auq ust 3 t. t 99~
D~ ~,
, FROM: Mike D~pllle$
~e~cH ~"~S To~ numar of p~, including ~sm;~ s~t' ~..
n~ S~e
' P~E EX~D~ TO ~D~SSEE
F~ ~tc~on
~looa ~ CO~N~:
~wes ~ C~
~cfl ~e~ ~: CI~ OF DKNTON ~OD G~NT APPLICA~ON
~, De~ Attached ~ a ~py of the ~dment to ~e flood piing ~t
Plmb~ ~s~ apphcauon for ~e C1W of Denton The o~d ~ll be sent to you m
· e m~ ~ ~ould ~ve ~ly ne~
~p blA~ Desi~
Please c~ me ~er~ ~s ~ng else that Is ne~ ~ for your
~aau~ help
U~es
Sold W~
W ~er Reso~
Watez ~s~a Syste~
Wa~ ~tewat~ ~ ~e~
I ~ ~ere ~s ~ proble~ r~o~g ~y of ~ese pages, ple~e c~
~ o~ office ~ 817~35-7291
08-31-95 06 31AM FROMFREESE &NICHOLS TO 915124639893///95195 P002/003
APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GI~ANT
FOR THE
C~PER C~K REGION~ DETE~ION P0~
PEC~ C~K ~OION~ C~ ~KO~ S~Y
Au~st 30, 1995
['he follower g ttem~ ~hould be noted regarding ~he apphcatlon for flood protecuon planning grant for
he City of', )enton, Tex~
'a_~e 7. ltet 2! The combined current un~nployment rate for the planning area Cooth Cooper
and Pecan creek water~eds) ~s $ 22%
)a~e 7. Itet 22 The combined current per-capita income tn the plannml~ area (both Cooper
and Pecan eruk xvatersheds) ~s $1:2,317
~.~J3_-3. ~ ~n D The work described m thts item does not include preparaUon of a TNKCC
perrmt Rather, the intent ts to review the current TNACC regulations
assomated with detention facthues and advtse the City of Denton on the
reqmrements to obtmn a penmt and any posstOle problem areas
~ Thc work dcsc~tbcd in flus item should bc madc to read "Azs~st the Ctty w~th
preparaUon of the nccessa~' documentauon to be submitted to the TNRCC
for approval of the regional detem~nn fa~'lw/d~gn" The intent is to compile
the necessary data from the mformat~on generated dunng thc study
~a_ae B-4. I~em F The intent of the work descn~bed m th~s ~tem is to compile the floodplain
~ m.+'ormatton generated dunng the study m a manner that ts acceptable to
FEMA so that it can be included m a subnuttel to FI~MA for a map revlzion
The work described tn th~s ~tcm does not include preperauon of · Corps of
Engineers 404 permtt Rather, the intent ts to review the current Corps of
Engineers regul&tmns associated w~th 404 perrmts and advtse the C~ty of
Denton on the requtrements to obtain e pernut and any possible problem
areas
~ ~ The mten~ of thc work described m ~ ttem is to compde the floodplain
informauon generated dunng the study tn · m~lncr that ~s acceptable to
FEMA so that it can be included tn a subrmttal to FEMA for a map rewston
Items II C end II D were combined into one ~tem any. tied "Perform Cosr/l]enefk
08-31-95 06 31AM FROMFREESE & NICHOLS TO 915124639893///95195 P003/003
TASK 1 - COOPER CREEK REGIONAl. DETENTION STUDY
C:ITY 011 DENTON TEXAS
I
I
TOTAL PROJECT t74,88e
A C E N T U R Y 0 F S E R V I C E
I~REBBB NI~HOI.~
Mr Gordon
Reg~on~ PI~g ~d R~h
T~ Wa~r ~velopment ~d
P.O. ~x 13231
17~ N. Congas Aven~
Ausan, Tex~ 78711-3231
Re: City of Denton Fund Grant Application
Dear Mr Thorn:
Enclosed is a copy of the amendment to the City of Denton's grant appheat~on for Texas Water
Development Board flood protectaon planmng funding The changes we discussed m our
prewous telephone conversation have been made
If there is any addmonal mformaUon needed for your cons~derataon, please feel free to call
Very truly yours,
FREESE' AND NICHOLS, INC.
Michael J Delhes, P E
Enclosure
xc File (DTN95195-2 10)
DTNg5195r1' ~LI~T~THORN 001]
Freese and Nichols, Inc Engineers Enwronmental Scientists Architects
4055 Internahonal Plaza Suite 200 Fort Worth Texas 76109 4895
817 735-7300 Metro 8t7-429 1900 Fax 817-735 7491
APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GRANT
FOR THE
COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION POND
PECAN CREEK REGIONAL CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY
August 30, 1995
The following items should be noted regarding the apphcation for flood protection planning grant for
the City of Denton, Texas
PaKe 7. Item 21 The combined current unemployment rate for the plannmS area (both Cooper
and Pecan creek watersheds) is $ 22%
Page 7. Item 22 The combined current per-capita income m the planmng area (both Cooper
and Pecan creek watersheds) is $12,317
Page B-3. Item D The work descnbed m tins item does not include preparauon of a TNRCC
permit Rather, the intent is to rewew the current TNRCC regulauons
associated w~th detenuon faaht~es and advise the City of Denton on the
reqmrements to obtmn a penmt and any possible problem areas
Pale B-4, Item E The work described m tbs ~tem should be made to read "Assist the Ctty w~th
preparaUon of the necessary documentation to be subnutted to the TNRCC
for approval of the regional detenuon faahty design" The intent is to compile
the necessary data ~om the information generated during the study
Page B-4. Item F The intent of the work described m tlus item is to compile the floodplain
mformataon generated during the study m a manner that is acceptable to
FEMA so that ~t can be included in a subn~ttal to FEMA for a map revision
Page B-6, Item D The work described m tbs ~tem does not include preparation of a Corps of
Engineers 404 penmt Rather, the intent is to review the current Corps of
Engineers regulations associated w~th 404 pernnts and adwse the City of
Denton on the requirements to obtmn a penmt and any possible problem
areas
Page B-6. Item E The intent of the work descnbed m tlas item is to compile the floodplain
reformation generated dunng the study in a manner that is acceptable to
FEMA so that it can be included m a subnuttal to FEMA for a map rewsion
Exhb~t C Items II C and II D were combined into one item entitled *'Perform Cost/Benefit
Analysis"
EXHIBIT C
TASK I - COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION STUDY
CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
TOTAL PROJECT $ 74,886