Loading...
1996-017 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DENTON, TE~S AND THE TE~S WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS SECTION I That the City Manager Ks hereby authorzzed to enter znto an agreement between the Czty of Denton, Texas and the Texas Water Development Board for flood protection plannzng SECTION II. That thzs ordinance shall become effectzve mmmed~lately upon zts passage and approval ~ PASSED AND APPROVED this the /~ day of~, 1996 · ATTEST JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY AP ED TO LEGAL FORM HERBERT L PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY STATE OF TEXAS TWDB Contract No 96-483-157 COUNTY OF TRAVIS Research and Planmng Fund Flood Protection Planmng THIS CONTRACT, (hereinafter "CONTRACT"), between the Texas Water Development Board (hereinafter "BOARD") and the C~ty of Denton (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR(S)"), ~s composed of two parts, Section I Specific conditions and excephons to the standard agreement and Section II Standard Agreement The terms and conditions set forth ~n Section I w~ll take precedence over terms and conditions ~n Section II SECTION I SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO STANDARD AGREEMENT ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS For the purposes of th~s Contract, the following terms or phrases shall have the meaning ascnbed therewith A BOARD - The Texas Water Development Board, or ~ts demgnated representative B CONTRACTOR(S) - C~ty of Denton C EXECUTIVE ADMII~IISTRATOR - The Executive Administrator of the Board or h~$ demgnated representative D PARTICIPANT(S) - None E REQUIRED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT(S) - None F BOARD APPROVAL DATE - October 19, 1995 G PLANNING AREA - The C~ty of Denton which contains the Cooper Creek watershed and the Pecan Creek Tnbutary PEC-4 watershed H DEADLINE FOR CONTRACT EXECUTION - January 18, 1996 CONTRACT INITIATION DATE - October 19, 1995 J STUDY COMPLETION DATE - September 30, 1996 K FINAL REPORT DEADLINE - November 30, 1996 L TOTAL STUDY COSTS - $97,980 M BOARD SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS - Not to exceed $48,990 or 50 percent of the total study costs or ~nd~v~dual voucher subm~smon N LOCAL SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS - $48,990'~n cash and $0 ~n ~n- kind services O VOUCHER SUBMISSION SCHEDULE - Monthly P OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO STANDARD AGREEMENT OF THIS CONTRACT - · Coordination w~th Denton County and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) [] Scope of work w~ll not contain Phase III of Task I (prehm~nary design) of the ong~nal apphcaflon w~th the exception of Item F IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parhes have caused th~s Contract to be duly executed ~n multiple ong~nals THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD Deputy Ex~uhve Adm~mstrator of Planmng Date / THE/~CTOR{S) RK~k Svehla C~ty Manager C~ty of Denton Date ARTICLE II CORRESPONDENCE All correspondence between the part~es shall be made to the follow~ng addresses For the BOARD For the CONTRACTOR{S) Mr Craig D Pedersen Mr JerryA Clark Executive Adm~mstrator Director of Englneenng and Transportation Texas Water Development Board 215 McK~nney Street P O Box 13231, Capitol Station Denton, TX 76201 Austin, Texas 78711-3231 Attenhon Regional Planning and ProJects Section 2 SECTION II STANDARDAGREEMENT ARTICLE I RECITALS Whereas, the CONTRACTOR(S) apphed to the BOARD, Ausbn, Texas for a planmng grant to develop a flood protection plan, Whereas, the CONTRACTOR(S) and PARTICIPANT(S) w~ll commit cash and/or ~n-k~nd services to pay for the local share of th~s planning project, Whereas, the CONTRACTOR(S) ~s the entity who w~ll act as administrator of the BOARD's planmng grant and w~ll be responsible for the execution of th~s contract, Whereas, on the BOARD APPROVAL DATE, the BOARD approved the CONTRACTOR(S)'s apphcat~on ,for financial assistance, Now, therefore, the BOARD and the CONTRACTOR(S), agree as follows ARTICLE II PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED 1 Services and act~wt;es prowded under this Contract shall be in stnct accordance w~th requirements of the Texas Water Code, Chapter 15, associated rules of the Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 355, Sect;ons 355 1-355 11, Subchapter A, Exhibit A, the ongmal grant apphcat;on, which is incorporated here~n and made a permanent part of th~s Contract, and th~s Contract 2 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll prepare a flood protection plan for the PLANNING AREA, as delineated and descnbed m Exhib~t A, according to the Scope of Work contained ~n Exhibit B 3 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll establ;sh formal, d~rect, and continuous ha;sons w;th all c~fles, counties, councils of governments, nver authonfles, and all applicable state agencies, d~stncts, federal agencies, including the appropriate project d~rectors of the U S Army Corps of Engineers, and other governmental ent~t~es hawng flood protection responsibility w;th~n the PLANNING AREA, and commumty leaders ~n the PLANNING AREA for the purpose of coordinating the scope of work and flood protection plan w~th all ex~st~ng studies, plans, or acfiwfles for the purpose of prowdmg ~nformat~on and obtaining ava;lable data for the development of the flood protection plan The planmng w~ll be coordinated w~th the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Program and all relevant flooding and drainage protechon studies and acflwt;es, which w~ll, also be rewewed as reformation for the development of th~s flood protection plan It w;ll also be the respons~b~hty of the CONTRACTOR to sohc~t comments from the general public as to the content of th~s flood protection planmng project 4 The CONTRACTOR(S) w;ll coordinate the flood protection plan w~th the ex~st;ng plans and pohc~es of the enflt~es I~sted above, the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC), and any other affected enflbes 5 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll hold coordination meetings w~th the PARTICIPANTS, consultants, local enflbes, the TNRCC, the BOARD, and any ~nterested part~es at the commencement of the project, at 50% completion, and following the STUDY COMPLETION DATE but before the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE and when deemed 3 necessary by e~ther the BOARD or the CONTRACTOR(S) to discuss the status of the flood protection plan The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll solicit ~nput and comments from the affected public on the draft final report and consider such input and comments for ~ncorporat~on m the final report ARTICLE III SCHEDULE, REPORTS, AND OTHER PRODUCTS 1 The CONTRACTOR(S) has unhl the DEADLINE FOR CONTRACT EXECUTION to execute th~s Contract and to prowde acceptable ewdence of REQUIRED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS and the CONTRACTOR(S) ab~hty to provide the LOCAL SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS to the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR or approval of the BOARD'S SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS w~ll be rescinded 2 The term of th~s Contract shall begin and the CONTRACTOR(S) shall begin performing ~ts obhgaflons hereunder on the BOARD APPROVAL DATE and shall expire on the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE Dehvery of an acceptable final report prior to the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE shall const;tute completion of the terms of this Contract 3 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll complete the Scope of Work and w~ll deliver seven (7) double-s~ded cop~es of a draft final report to the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR no later than the STUDY COMPLETION DATE The draft final report will ~nclude the methodology and findings of the study, ~ncludlng alternatives considered, cost estimates, recommended alternatives, an implementation plan and schedule, recommended enflt~es to ~mplement the recommended alternatives, appropriate financing mechamsms, and other pertinent ~nformahon After a 30-day rewew period, rewew comments w~ll be returned by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR to the CONTRACTOR(S) 4 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll consider ~ncorporating comments from the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR and other commentors on the draft final report into a final report The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll include a copy of the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR's comments in the final report The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll submit one (1) unbound camera ready original and nme (9) bound double-sided copies of the final report to the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR no later than the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll submit one (1) electronic copy of any computer programs or models and an operations manual developed under the terms of th~s Contract 5 The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll submit progress reports w~th submittal of vouchers according to the VOUCHER SUBMISSION SCHEDULE Progress reports shall be in written form and shall ~nclude a bnef statement of the overall progress made since the last status report, a bnef descnptlon of any problems that have been encountered dunng the prowous reporting period that w~ll affect the study, delay the timely completion of any port~on of th~s Contract, ~nh~b~t the completion of or cause a change in any of the study's products or obJectives, and a descnpbon of any action the CONTRACTOR(S) plans to take to correct any problems that have been encountered 6 The COMPLETION DATE and the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE can be extended upon wntten approval by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR The CONTRACTOR(S) should not~fy the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR ~n wnflng within ten (10) working days prior to the COMPLETION DATE or thirty (30) days pnor to the FINAL REPORT DEADLINE that the CONTRACTOR(S) ~s requesbng an extension to the respective dates 4 ARTICLE IV COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT 1 The BOARD agrees to compensate and reimburse the CONTRACTOR(S) m a total amount not to exceed the BOARD'S SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS for costs recurred and pa~d by the CONTRACTOR(S) pursuant to performance of th~s Contract The CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll contribute local matching funds m sources and amounts defined as the LOCAL SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS The BOARD shall reimburse the CONTRACTOR(S) for ninety percent (90%) of the BOARD's share of each ~nvo~ce pending the CONTRACTOR(S)'s performance, completion of a Final Report, and whiten acceptance of sa~d Final Report by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR, at which time the BOARD shall pay the retained ten percent (10%) to the CONTRACTOR(S) 2 The CONTRACTOR(S) shall submit vouchers and documentation for reimbursement b~lhng according to the VOUCHER SUBMISSION SCHEDULE and m accordance w~th the approved task and expense budgets contained ~n Exhibit C to th~s Contract At the d~screflon of the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR and upon wntten memorandum to the contract file, the CONTRACTOR(S) has budget flexibility w~thm task and expense budget categones to the extent that the resulting change ~n amount ~n any one category does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the total amount authonzed by th~s Contract Larger dewations shall require a formal contract amendment For all reimbursement billings including any subcontractor's expenses, the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR must have prowded written approval of REQUIRED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT(S) and contracts or agreements between the CONTRACTOR(S) and the subcontractor The CONTRACTOR(S) ~s fully responsible for paying all charges by subcontractors pnor to reimbursement by the BOARD 3 The CONTRACTOR(S) and ~ts subcontractors shall maintain satisfactory financial accounting documents and records, ~ncludmg cop~es of ~nvo~ces and receipts, and shall make them available for examination and audit by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR Accounbng by the CONTRACTOR(S) and ~ts subcontractors shall be ~n a manner consistent w~th generally accepted accounting pnnc~ples 4 A progress report and the following documentation which documents the TOTAL STUDY COSTS for reimbursement by the BOARD to the CONTRACTOR(S) for the BOARD'S SHARE OF THE TOTAL STUDY COSTS shall be submitted by the CONTRACTOR(S) to the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR for reimbursement b~lhng A Summary of total expenses ~ncurred ~ncludmg the following ~nformat~on (1) Contractor's Vendor Ident~ficatmn Number, (2) TVVDB Contract Number, (3) Total expenses for the b~lhng penod, beg~nmng (date) to ending (date), (4) Total In-k~nd serwces, (5) Total Services for th~s period, (6) Less Local Sham of the total study costs for the b~lhng period, (7) Total BOARD's share of the total study costs for the b~llmg period, (8) Amount of reta~nage to be w~thheld for the b~lhng penod, (9) Total costs to be reimbursed by the BOARD for the b~lhng penod, and (10) Certification, s~gned by the CONTRACTOR(S) authorized representabve, that the expenses submitted for the b~lhng penod are a true and correct representation of amounts pa~d for work performed d~rectly related to th~s contract B ,Total payment due for a b~lhng penod shall be separated by State F~scal Year (e g, through August 31, 1995 for State F~scal Year 1995 and beginning September 1, 1995 for 5 State F~scal Year 1996) Supporting ~nformat~on shall also be separated by State F~scal Year If a voucher Is submitted that requests payment on services performed in more than one F~scal Year, a breakdown per F~scal Year shall be included, C For d~rect expenses ~ncurred by the CONTRACTOR(S) for outside consulting services -- cop~es of ~nvo~ces to the CONTRACTOR(S) showing the tasks that were performed, the pement and cost of each task completed, a total cost figure for each d~rect expense category ~ncludmg labor, fnnge, overhead, travel, communication and postage, techmcal and computer services, expendable supphes, pnnt~ng and reproduction, and the total dollar amount due to the consultant, and D For travel and subsistence expenses, ~nclud~ng such expenses for subcontractors -- (1) names, dates, work locations, t~me penods at work locations, ~tem~zatlon of subsistence expenses of each employee, limited, however, to travel expenses authonzed for state employees by the General Appropnaflons Act, Tex Law Regular Session, 1995, Art IX, Sec 12 through 18, at IX43 or as amended or superseded, (2) other transportation costs -- cop~es of ~nvo~ces covenng t~ckets for transportahon or, ~f not available, names, dates, and points of travel of ~ndiwduals, and (3) all other reimbursable expenses -- ~nvo~cas or purchase vouchers showing reason for expense w~th receipts to ewdence the amount recurred ARTICLE V OWNERSHIP, PUBLICATION, AND SUBCONTRACTING I The BOARD shall have unlim~ted rights to technical or other data resulting d~rectly from the performance of serwces under th~s Contract It ~s agreed that all reports, drafts of reports, or other matenal, data, drawings, computer programs and codes associated with th~s Contract and developed by the CONTRACTOR(B) or ~ts subcontractors pursuant to this Contract shall become the ,Iomt property of the CONTRACTOR(S) and the BOARD These materials shall not be copynghted or patented by the CONTRACTOR(B) or by any consultants ~nvolved ~n th~s Contract unless the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR approves ~n wntmg the nght to establish copynght or patent, provided, however, that copyrighting or patenting by the CONTRACTOR(S) or ~ts subcontractors w~ll ~n no way I~m~t the BOARD's access to or nght to request and receive or d~stnbute data and ~nformafion obtained or developed pursuant to th~s Contract Any matenal subject to a BOARD copynght and produced by the CONTRACTOR(S) or BOARD pursuant to th~s Contract may be pnnted by the CONTRACTOR(S) or the BOARD at their own cost and dlstnbuted by e~ther at their d~scret~on The CONTRACTOR(S) may otherwise utilize such material prowded under th~s Contract as ~t deems necessary and appropnate, including the right to pubhsh and d~stnbute the materials or any parts thereof under ~ts own name, prowded that any BOARD copyright ~s appropnately noted on the pnnted matenals 2 The CONTRACTOR(S) agrees to acknowledge the BOARD ~n any news releases or other publications relahng to the work performed under th~s Contract 3 No work herein called for by the CONTRACTOR(S) shall be reimbursed for expenses by the BOARD to the CONTRACTOR(S) w~thout pnor wntten approval by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR of the contract or agreement between the CONTRACTOR(S) and ~ts subcontractor Each subcontract or agreement shall ~nclude a detailed budget eshmate w~th specific cost details for each task or specific ~tem of work to be performed by the subcontractor and for each category of reimbursable expenses The subcontracts shall 6 conform to the terms of the Contract and ~nclude prows~ons which require subcontractor compliance w~th BOARD rules ~ The CONTRACTOR(S) must also adhere to all requirements ~n state law pertaining to the procurement of professmnal services ARTICLE ¥1 AMENDMENT, TERMINATION, AND STOP ORDERS 1 Th~s Contract may be altered or amended by mutual wntten consent or terminated by the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR at any time by wntten not~ce to the CONTRACTOR(S) Upon rece,pt of such termination not~ce, the CONTRACTOR(S) shall, unless the notice d~rects otherwise, ~mmed~ately discontinue all work ~n connection w~th the performance of this Contract and shall proceed to cancel promptly all ex~sflng orders insofar as such orders are chargeable to th~s Contract The CONTRACTOR(S) shall submit a statement showing in detail the work performed under th~s Contract to the date of termination The BOARD shall then pay the CONTRACTOR(S) promptly that proportion of the prescnbed fee which apphes to the work actually performed under this Contract, less all payments that have been prewously made Thereupon, cop~es of all work accomphshed under th~s Contract shall be delivered to the BOARD 2 The EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR may issue a Stop Work Order to the CONTRACTOR(S) at any time Upon receipt of such order, the CONTRACTOR(S) shall d~scontlnue all work under th~s Contract and cancel all orders pursuant to th~s Contract, unless the order directs otherwise If the EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR does not ~ssue a Restart Order w~thm 60 days after receipt by the CONTRACTOR(S) of the Stop Work Order, the CONTRACTOR(S) shall regard th~s Contract terminated ~n accordance w~th the foregoing prows~ons ARTICLE VII NO DEBT AGAINST THE STATE 1 Th~s Contract and Agreement shall not be construed as creating any debt by or on behalf of the State of Texas and the BOARD, and all obligations of the State of Texas are subject to the ava~lablhty of funds To the extent the performance of th~s Contract transcends the bmnmum ~n which th~s Contract ~s entered into, th~s Contract is specifically contingent upon the continued authonty of the BOARD and appropnabons therefore ARTICLE VIII LICENSES, PERMIT, AND INSURANCE 1 For the purpose of th~s Contract, the CONTRACTOR(S) w~ll be considered an ~nd~pendent contractor and therefore solely responsible for hab~hty resulting from negligent acts or omissions The CONTRACTOR(S) shall obtain all necessary insurance, ~n the judgement of the CONTRACTOR(S), to protect themselves, the BOARD, and employees and officials of the BOARD from hab~hty ansmg out of th~s Contract The CONTRACTOR(S) shall ~ndemn~fy and hold the BOARD and the State of Texas harmless, to the extent the CONTRACTOR(S) may do so ~n accordance w~th state law, from any and all loses, damages, hab~hty, or claims therefore, on account of personal injury, death, or property damage of any nature whatsoever caused by the CONTRACTOR(S), ans~ng out of the acbwtms under th~s Contract 2 The CONTRACTOR(S) shall be solely and entirely responsible for procunng all appropriate hcenses and permits which may be required by any competent authonty for the CONTRACTOR(S) to perform the subject work ARTICLE IX SEVERANCE PROVISION I Should any one or more prows~ons of th~s Contract be held to be null, void, voidable, or for any reason whatsoever, of no force and effect, such provision(s) shall be construed as severable from the remainder of th~s Contract and shall not affect the validity of all other prows~ons of th~s Contract which shall remain of full force and effect EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK (Page B-1 to B-6 of Original Grant Application) 10 EXHIBIT C I TASK BUDGET Cooper Creek Regional Detention Study TASK DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1 Reconnaissance and data cotle~ion $3 162 {30 2 Conceptual Evaluation $20,070 00 3 t Prepare Information for CLOMR Request $1,706 00 4 Other Expenses S27,966 00 Total $5%904 00 Pecan Creek Flow Diversion Mit~gation Study TASK DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1 Reconnaissance and data celh~'flon $3,242 00 2 Preliminary Design $23,497 {30 3 Other Expenses $18,337 00 Total $45~076 00 EXPENSE BUDGET CATEGORY TOTAL Freese and N~chols, Inc Survey I Geotechmcal AMOUNT SubconsultantI Subconsultant A Salanes & Wages~ $15,199 $8 504 $6,728 B Fnnge2 $7,361 $1,486 $1 316 C Travel $188 $300 $250 D Expendable Suppllss $0 $150 $150 E Subcontract $100,825 $37,363 $0 $0 Services F Tech/Comp Svcs $3,823 $2 500 $3,000 G Commumcatmns $174 $100 $100 H Reproduction $343 $0 $0 Overhead3 $17,345 $3,508 $3,105 J Profit $16,184 $3,270 $2,895 TOTAL $97,980 00 $19,818 00 $17r545 00 11 ~ Salanes and War:les ~s defined as the cost of salaries of engineers, draftsmen, stenographers, surveymen clerks, laborers etc for time d~rectly chargeable to this contract = Fnnoe is defined as the cost of social secunb/contributions, unemployment, exc~se, and payroll taxes, employment compensabon insurance, rebrement benefits, medical and insurance benefits, sick leave, vacation, and hohday pay apphcable thereto ~ Overhead ~s defined as the costs ~ncurred ~n maintaining a place of bus~ness and performing professional serwces s~mllar to those specified In th~s contract These costs shall include the following · Indirect salanes, including that po~on of the salary of pflncipale and executives that ~s allocable to general super~slon, · Indirect salary fnnge benefits, · Accounting and legal services related to normal management and business operations, · Travel costs recurred ~n the normal course of overall administration oflhe business, · Eqmpment rental, · Deprec~abon of furmture, fixtures, equipment, and vehicles, · Dues, subscnpbons, and fees associated with trade, business, technical, and professional organlzabons, · Other Insurance, · Rent and ut~l~Jes, and · Repairs and maintenance of furmture, fixtures, and equipment 12 APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GRANT FOR COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION POND PECAN CREEK REGIONAL CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY Prepared for THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS by FREESE AND NICHOLS, ]NC AUGUST 1995 FREESE - NICHOLS TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION 1 II PLANNING INFORMATION 4 III WRITTEN ASSLrRANCES 10 IV PROOF OF NOTIFICATION 10 EXHIBIT A - Planmng Area Map EXHIBIT B - Detailed Scope of Work EXHIBIT C - Detmled Task and Budget EXHIBIT D - Proposed Time Schedule EXHIBIT E - Staff Quahficauons EXttlBIT' F - Wnttan Assurances EXHIBIT G- Proof of Not~ficaUon EXIqlBIT H - 1996-2000 Capital Improvement Program APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GRANT FOR COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION POND AND i PECAN CREEK REGIONAL CBANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS The following application is presented to the Texas Water Development Board for consideration m response to the request for proposals as adverused m the August 4, 1995 Texas iegtster for the funding of a regional detention study for the Cooper Creek watershed and a regional channel improvement study for the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed wttinn the City of Denton, Texas To, assist m the TWDB revaew process, the format of tins application parallels the guidelines for funding apphcations procedures obtained from the TWDB I. GENERAL INFORMATION The City of Denton is a political subdixasmn of the State &Texas wath the authority to plan for and implement flood protemon meamres and is a member of the National Flood Insurance Program (1) Legal name of apphcant City of Denton (2) Participating pohtical subd~visions City of Denton (3) Authority of law under winch each political subdivaslon was created The City of Denton, Texas was chartered on February 24, 1959 as a General Law City, with the power to levy taxes (4) Name, litle, address, phone number and facsimile number of applicant's official representative Mr Jerry Clark, P E Director of Engineermg and Transportation 215 McKanney Street Denton, TX 76201 Ph (817) 566-8358 Fax (817) 566-8236 (5) CttaUons of apphcant's legal authority to plan for and ~mplement flood protection measures The C~ty of Denton has junsd~ctaon to implement dnunagu design criteria and general sub&wsion regulations as per ns Subd~vismn Ordinances All drainage ~mprovements must comply w~th the drainage design cntena and must be approved by the Director of Enl0neenng and Transportataon prior to unplementaUon The C~ty of Denton has adopted a flood control ordinance in accordance w~th the Natmnal Flood Insurance Program requirements (6) Is tYas apphcataon m response to a pubhshed Request for Proposals hst m the Texas Regls~er? Yes (7) Document number of Request for Proposals and date published TRD #9509442 pubhshed m the Texas Regtster, August 4, 1995 (8) The total anticlpated planmng cost of the regional detention study The total planmng cost is expected to be $120,000 (9) Total mount of grant funds requested fi.om the TWDB The amount of funding requested ts $60,000 (10) Apphcant cash contribution to the study The Ctty of Denton will match the $60,000 proxaded by the TWDB (11) Source of cash cuntnbution, explanation of source of local cash contnbuUon and hst of sources (a) General Revenue (b) Bond Funds (c) (Exact amount from each source cannot be determaned at ttus t~me Funding will be fi.om either or both of these sources based on the availability of funds when the project is undertaken ) (12) Apphcant m-land contnbutlons, including a descnption of in-land services to be provaded None 2 (13) D~tailed description of why proposed planning IS needed Cooper Creek Regional Detention A sigmficant portion of the Cooper Creek watershed is presently undeveloped The current development trend is to proceed from the south to the north Fortunately, the bulk of the undeveloped area m the watershed is m the upper one-tlurd of the watershed (north) There are several segments of Cooper Creek that are currently experiencing erosion due to the increase m development m the watershed and two bridges have been washed out The lower portion of Cooper Creek is fully developed and channel improvements in this area are not economically feasible, since there is essentially no room for cbsnnel expansion Implementation of a regional detenUon system may provide adequate flood protection and allow the development m the watershed to continue as well as prevent further erosion damage downstream Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement The malonty of the Pecan Creek Tnbutary PEC-4 watershed is presently developed There are slgmficant areas along the tributary that are vathin the 100-year floodway, w~eh are presently developed for commeroal and residential use The primary cause of the inundation of these areas is the exlstlng M K T Railroad crossing near the center of the stream length, which causes sufficient backwater that water is diverted from the mare channel rotc Bell Avenue and In three directions, one of which is out of the PEC-4 watershed and into the Pecan Creek watershed The diverted flow diversion Is of sufficient magmtude that the Corps of Engineers has delineated a floodway along the flow diversion path In addition to the backwater caused by the railroad, there is insufficient channel capacity downstream of the railroad crossing to convey the 100-year floodwaters The proposed planning is intended to ehminate the lnterbasm flow diversion by providing sufficient channel improvements for flood control within the entire Pecan Creek Tnbutary PEC-4 watershed (approximately 1 5 stream miles) Flood control will be achieved by restricting the 100-year stormwater flow to the PEC-4 channel area Implementing the proposed planmng measures will remove a large number of properties from the floodway, including some existing homes Also, there will be an additional benefit to the properues along the ms~n. Pecan Creek stream by ehrn~nating the flow diversions from Tributary PEC-4 (14) Detailed description of'why funding assistance is needed The flood protection planmng process must be approached on a watershed-w~de basis to provide an orderly system ofmiprovements Planning efforts that are watershed-wide are by nature more costly than isolated, or local improvements Unfortunately, the Cluzens of Denton are more willing to prowde funding for the physical improvements associated with the local projects than they are for planmng efforts (local or regional) Funding for the structural ~mprovements to be developed by fins proposed planning effort ts currently available through the City's capnal ~mprovement program (see Item l 1 below) The current capital maprovement program does not include funding for the planmng effort needed to develop the reqmred structrual xmprovements Obtmmng funding assistance for these planmng efforts could lrnt~ate additmnal funchng from other sources (15) IdenuficaUon of potenUal sources and amounts of funding available for nnplementaUon of viable flood protecuon measures resulting from the proposed planmng The proposed Capital Improvement Program for 1996-97 include (a) Cooper Creek Improvements (Phase I) $502,000 (b) Pecan Creek Tnb PEC-4 Imprvmts (Near Robertson St ) $734,000 The proposed Capital Improvement Program for 1998-99 ~nclude (c) Pecan Creek Tnb PEC-4 Imprvmts (Near Bradshaw St ) $734,000 (d) Cooper Creek Improvements (Phases H and III) $1,162,000 and $712,000 H. PLANNING INFORMATION (16) Descnptmn ofgeograpl~cal planmng area Cooper Creek. The City of Denton ~s located in Denton County at the junctaon of Interstate I-hghways 35E and 35W, approxamately 41 males northwest of Dallas, Texas and approramately 36 males northeast of Fort Worth, Texas The Cooper Creek watershed contoans approximately 4,500 acres and generally slopes from the northwest to the southeast toward the Lake Lewisxalle reservmr The Cooper Creek watershed hes almost entirely vafinn the City of Denton proper or 1ts extratemtonal junsdict~on There are also four tributaries to Cooper Creek that will be studied for detentmn posslbfl~Ues m the proposed project Pecan Creek The Pecan Creek Tnbutary PEC-4 watershed contains apprommately 1,100 acres located enurely vofinn the City of Denton and generally slopes from the northwest to the southeast toward the Lake Lew~svflle reservoir The headwaters of the tributary begin at the Umvemty of North Texas campus The majonty of the stream length extends through the older section of the city, including a downtown commemal Oasmct, a low income residentlal neighborhood and an eyastlng cemetery 4 (17) M~p of proposed planmng area I, ,, ,~7 See Extablt A (18) D6scnptlon of cresting or potential flood hazard the planmng is intended to address and the way m which the proposed planning wdl address the problem Cooper Creek Regional Detention Emstmg developments along the lower segments of Cooper Creek are experiencing erosion al6ng the channel banks The culvert crossings at Mayhfll and Mmgo Roads are severely undersized and have washed out m the past Mayhill road is an arterial with a dmly traffic load of 2,000 to 3,000 vehicles per day IVhngo Road is a heaxuly traveled route w~th apprommately 4,000 vpd, which consists largely of people who commute to and from the City of Denton from the east Further development m the upstream portaons of the Cooper Creek w~tershed can cause these problems to mtensify, causing w~despread erosion along the creek through the emstang developments and contanued damage to the Mlngo Road culvert The damage from flooding is likely to vary widely, ranging from simple channel bank erosion, to potential damage to structures along the creek, to potentaal injury resultang from another Mingo Road culvert wash-out Development is such that there is no room for expanchng the ex~stmg channel for flood protectmn The proposed planmng will determine the potantaal for detention sites upstream of the historically flooded areas to help maintain, or possibly reduce, crusting peak discharges along Cooper Creek A system of detentton ponds constructed within the watershed cannot be constructed at random w~thout evaluating the cumulatave effect of several detentton ponds o~ the peak flow v~thin Cooper Creek It is possible that a randomly constructed system of de~entton ponds can make eondtttons worse along Cooper Creek by causing peak flows from one or more tnbutanes to coincide wath peaks on the mare stem of Cooper Creek P0can Creek Regional Channel Improvement Since the majonty of the PEC-4 tributary flows through ex~stmg developments, there is a high potential for property damage as a result of the floodwaters leaving the channel banks Diverted flow that leaves the mare channel flows along Bell Avenue, which has a daffy traffic load of approximately 11,000 vehicles There is also a potenual for cmzen injury and/or death at]some of the stream crossings In several locations, the crusting tnbutary channel is several fe~t deep and is dtrectly adjacent to the roadway or along a shopping center parking lot F~hally, the downstream half of the tributary passes through a low income residential ne~lghborhood, where there is a htgh potential for injury since many of the homes were constructed long ago and are located very close to the channel The proposed planning will determine the extent of channel improvements needed to llrmt the 100-year floodplmn to the channel area, thus remo~nng a slgmficant number of presently developed commercial properties and residences from the floodway (19) Descnptlon ofl~stoncal flooding and flood damage in the proposed planmng area Cooper Creek Regional Detention Flooding problems m the Cooper Creek watershed are relatively new due to the development that took place m the late 1970's and early 1980's Since this development occurred, the City of Denton has had at least two 10-year storms that produced sufficient runoff to overtop most of the bndges/culverts along Cooper Creek Most of the older bndges (20 to 30 years old) will convey runoffon the order of a S-year frequency There have been instances where the bridges at Mayhfll and lVfingo Roads have been completely washed out Temporary culverts have been installed at the Mayhfll and M~ngo Road crossing untat such time as the potential for wash-out is s~;ficantly reduced In adchtaon, many areas along Cooper Creek, especially the older, established residential areas are expenancmg bank eros;on There have been instances where floodwaters have inundated homes in these areas Pecan Creek Remonal Channel Improvement Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 flows through some of the oldest neighborhoods wittun the City of Denton, be~mnmng at the Umversity of North Texas, contmmng through the southern portion of downtown, and then through an older low income residential area Many buddings are located only a few feet from the channel bank In one case, a budding was constructed over the channel The emst~ng channel was constructed m many stages beginning m the late 1920% to the early 1960% There is no documentation offloochng prior to the early 1980's In the 1960's and 1970% the Umvemty of North Texas constructed many new buildings and parking lots Several of the older single farmly residential neighborhoods near the umvemty have been converted to mult~-farmly uses The amount of runoff from these areas has increased dramatically The City of Denton has experienced at least two 10-year storms since 1981 In those instances, there were severe street flooding along Tributary PEC-4, as well as bridge overtopping The worst flooding has bean observed to occur on Bell Avenue just upstream of the lvlKT Rmlroad/Robertson Street crossing Stormwater has been observed as h~gh as five feet, stranding several motorists and inundating nearby homes During the flood events, the residential area east of Bell Avenue, south of I-hckory Street and north of Dallas Drive become maccess~ble to emergency vel~cles Current hydraulic models suggest that much of the downtown area and many of the older neighborhoods would be inundated by the 100-year stormwaters 6 (20) Descnptton of how the planning ~ address pubhc safety and welfare Cooper Creek Regtonal Detention The objecttve of the proposed planp!n$ Is to develop a system of regional detention ponds to reduce the peak &scharges along Cooper Creek such that the erosion along the creek can be reduced or ehmmated The re~onal ponds vall maintain peak discharge at a level consistent w~th file capacity of the existing ~ownstream channel to avoad channel improvements m an alr0ady conflno~l space Also, reducing the peak dascharges along Cooper Creek will reduce the size of a new culvert?ondge at Mayhdl and M~ngo Roads to prevent future wash-outs The reductton m peak chscharges will reduce, or posstbly ehn~nate the potential damage to structures along Cooper Creek, especially at Maylmll and IVhngo Roads, thereby reducing the polenttal comprormse of the pubhc safety and welfare Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement l~.h~rmnntlng the flow dtverslon by confimng the floodwaters to the channel area will remove a s~,tleant number of presently developed propemes from the floodway, thereby reducing the~ potential for injury and/or death related to flooding along the tnbuta~j In addition, there wdl be a sigmflcant reductton m the property damage expected along the creek Implementation of the flood protecuon measures may have a l~gh potential for econonuc b~ettt since the flood prote~on is hkely to proxade oppormmties for the excasmg propemes to ~expand and/or re-develop (21) Current unemployment rate m the proposed planmog area Cooper Creek watershed 3 13% Pecan Creek watershed 6 9% (22) Current per-capita raceme an the proposed planning area C~oper Creek watershed $15,841 Pecan Creek'watershed $10,294 (23) Current population residing in the proposed planmng area Cooper Creek watershed 2100 Pecan Creek watershed 2750 (24) Current population residing m the lO0-year floodplain C~oper Creek watershed 1700 Pecan Creek watershed 2200 (25) Value of property in the 100-year floodplain Cooper Creek watershed $48,809,200 Pecan Creek watershed $58,393,825 (26) Number of National Flood Insurance Program pohcaes m effect m the proposed plann,ng area There are currently 271 NFIP pohcles in effect Cooper and Pecan Creeks Detailed mformataon of the number of poheaes in effect per watershed was not av~ulable from FEMA However, we estamate the estimate there to be 135 current pohc~es an the Cooper Creek watershed and 40 in the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed (27) Method for determanaUon of potential cost effecttveness of proposed flood protection solutions Cooper Creek Regional Detentaon The method for deterrmmng the potential cost effectiveness of the proposed regional detenUon system Is to compare the cost of the proposed detentaon pond system to the value of property removed from the floodplain Addluonal conslderatmn vail be g~ven to the redu~on m the flood hazard potential, whether property damage or injury to the cltazens in the planmng area A level of protection of the proposed regional detentaon system wdl be determined on a recurrence mterval basis 0 e to deterrmne the frequency of flooding vath the regional detention system in place) Pecan Creek Re~,lonal Channel Improvement, The method for detenmmng the potential cost effecttveness of the proposed channel maprovements ~s to compare the cost of the proposed Improvements to the value of property removed from the floodplain Additional consideration will be given to the reduction m the flood hazard potentaal, whether property damage or injury to the cmzens m the planmng area (28) Date(s) and desenptaon(s) of most recem flood protection planmng m the proposed planmng area Cooper Creek Regional Detention None to date Pecan Creek Regional Channel Improvement Dunng the period of June 1993 to February 1994, the Caty of Denton lured a consultant to investigate possible actions to reduce flooding along Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 between 8 Bell Avenue and Lakey Street Several hydrauhc Stream modlficataons were rewewed, such as removing exastmg culverts, expansion of exastmg bridges, etc An abandoned nulroad bridge crossing was removed at a cost of $20,000 m an attempt to xmprove the channel conveyance The result of the bridge removal was to only shghtly reduce the floodplain elevatson Other investigations made suggest that md~wdual aeuons, such as culvert removal, would have httle or no effect when implemented individually, but ffdone m combmaUon the culvert maprovements may have a s~gmficant ~mpact on the floodplain elevatmn Therefore, a regional approach to flood planmug along the Tributary PEC-4 xs thought to provide an econonucal approach (29) ' Desenpt~on of how the proposed planmng will coordinate w~th other flood protection plans or facilities m the planmng area, surrounding regions, and the state Both pomons of the proposed study will be performed using the C~ty of Denton Master Drcanage Plan as a gtude when detenmmng the locatmn of the proposed regmnal detentmn pond rotes and the possible channel ~mprovement scenanos In addmon, the C~ty of Denton Drainage Des~Sn Criteria Manual will be used to evaluate the hydrologic and hydrauhc characten~cs of the regmnal detention ponds and the proposed channel ~mprovements The C~ty's thorough fare master plan, master zomng plan and water and sewer master plans will belconsulted dunng the study (30) Detailed scope of work for the proposed planning See attached Exhibit B (3 l) Task and budget for detailed scope of work by task See attached Exlub~t C (32) T~me schedule for completing the detailed scope of work by task See attached Exhtb~t D (33) Expense budget for total proposed planmng See attached Extub~t C (34) Quahficataons and d~rect experience of proposed project staff S~e attached Erdubn E 9 (35) Identafy the watershed(s) for which flood protecUon needs roll be addressed Cooper Creek and Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watersheds (36) Description of how flood protection needs of the entare watershed vol1 be considered Refer to Item 20 above (37) Method of momtonng study progress Penodtc (at least monthly) project coordmatton meetangs between City staffand consultant HI. WRITTEN ASSURANCES (3 8) Proposed planning does not duphcate e~Ung projects with the exceptmn of updating emsUng flood protection plans See attached Exlubit F (39) lmplementatton of viable soluttons ldenUfied through the proposed plann~r~g vail be diligently pursued and local sources of funding for tmplementataon of v~able solutions ~ be provaded See attached Exlubit F (40) Wntten exadence that local matching funds and m-kand services are available for the proposed plamng See attached Exhtblt F (4 l) Applicant is a pamclpant in the Nattonal Flood Insurance Program The City of Denton participates in the National Flood Insurance Program and is hstefl as Commumty Number 480194 See attached Exl~bit F IV, PROOF OF NOTIFICATION Notaficatlon to all political subdivisions in the proposed planning area by cemfled m~ that an apphcaUon for planning grant assistance is being filed with the TWDB has been sent to the following Denton County and the Denton Independent School District (refer to Exhtbits G and It) l0 EXHIBIT B DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK FOR TASK 1: COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION STUDY PHASE I - RECONNAISSANCE & DATA COLLECTION A A coordinatmn meeUng will be held between the City and its consultant for the purpose of reviewing avadable data for use during the study, reviewing the scope of the work to be done and the objec~ves of the study, and to review the project personnel and their responslblhties for both the City and its consultant B Perform visit to the Cooper Creek watershed to evaluate possible sites for regional detention pogds The site wsit ,will include the rewew of not more than s~x possible sites for acceptahihty as regional detention faclhties, including the following 1 The area north of Cooper Creek, east of Old North Road, west of Loop 288, and south of Windsor Street 2 The area north of Kings Row, east of Yorkshire, and southwest of Loop 288 3 The area north of Hercules, east of F M 2164, south of Loop 288, and west of Redstone 4 The area north of Evers Parkway, west ofF M 2164, and south of Loop 288 5 Two other addiuonal sites may be selected for evaluation in the study if conditions observed during the site visit suggest a favorable location C Coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to obtain the latest hydrologic and hydrauhe computer models for the Cooper Creek watershed D Coordinate with local utihty companies to determine the presence of existing utihty lines wlflun the possible regional detention facility site listed in Item B above E Coordinate with the City staff to obtain available base mapping The base map(s) will be prepared by the City from information currently available on its geographic information system (GIS) F Coordinate with survey subconsultant to obtain field data necessary for preliminary sizing of the proposed detention facilities at each location G Coordinate with geotechmcal subconsultant to obtain soil bonng data at each site One B-1 EXHIBIT B bonng will be made at each location selected as a possible detention site PHASE H - CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION A Perform hydrologic analysis on the sites identified m Item I B above, including the followmg 1 Computation of contributing drannage area to the sites being evaluated 2 Modify the existing hydrologic computer model from FEMA Of avlulable) to include design computation points at the potential regmnal detention facility sites If an existing hydrologic computer model is not available, a new model will have to be created 3 Determination of the 5-, 10-, 25-, 50- and 100-year peak discharges for exasting and ultimate watershed conditions with the detention facilities in place at each potential regional detention faeihty site The typical SCS primary spillway will be used to estimate peak discharges w~th the proposed detention facilities in place 4 Determine the maximum storage available at each of the rel0onal detention facility sites Future development adjacent to each site will be considered in the determination of the detention pond layout phase in addition to the existing development surrounding each site 5 Evaluate the cumulative effect of the regional detention facilities on the peak discharges along Cooper Creek for the portion of the creek upstream of Loop 288 Pnontize the regmnal detention pond construction by cost/benefit analysis No more than twelve constmeuon sequence scenarios will be evaluated to determane the effect of construction sequencing on the Cooper Creek peak discharges B Perform hydraulic analysis of ~mpact of detention facflmes on Cooper Creek floodplain 1 Modify existing HEC-2 hydrauhc stream model of Cooper Creek to include the peak discharges computed in Item II A above 2 Compute expected floodplain profiles corresponding to 10-, 50- 100- and 500-year frequencies 3 Delineate the 100-year floodplmns on available topographic maps for existing conditions and ultimate development conditions with the proposed detention facilities in place 4 Prepare summary table of results ofhydrauhc ailalysis B-2 EXHIBIT B C Prepare a conceptual est,mate of ahti61p~,t~d construchon costs associated w~th the proposed regional detention system D Remew the TNRCC regulataons'assoc, ated w~th detention facd~ty construction and outline steps needed to obtain TNRCC approval of the proposed regaonal detenuon system Potential problem areas, If any, will be also identified E Summarize the results of the conceptual evaluation 1 Prepare a report sumrnarlZmg the findings of the conceptual evaluation The following ~tems shall be included m the conceptual report a Comparison of chscharges for cresting development, ultimate watershed development, and ultmate watershed development w~th the proposed regional detention system m place b Map showing the enttre watershed w~th the locations of the proposed regional detention faclhties and their respechve contributing draanage areas, the hormontal location of the exasting utihtles that could pose a potential conflmt w~th the proposed detention facilities, and the 100-year floodplmn hmats for cresting conditions and ult, mate watershed cond~taons with the detention faclhtaes m place c The antmpated constmctton costs of the regional detention facilities on a per- me basis as well as for the entire regional detention system A recommendation will be made concermng the sequencing of construcung the regional detention facilities m accordance with Item II A above d A recommendatton for alternative dry weather uses for the regtonal detention fac~ties, as well as the possibility ofretmmng water ~n the ponds for aesthetm purposes, such as ,n a park 2 Conduct a coordination meeting wnh the consultant to discuss the results of the conceptual evaluation and the consultant's recommendations for proceeding w~th the project PHASE HI - PRELIMINARY DESIGN A One meeting will be held wtth affected property owners near each of the proposed regional detention faaht~es, up to a maximum of six meetings wth the property owners Items to be discussed include the purpose of the proposed regmnal detention system, concerns the property owners may have regarding the detention facdmes, and ideas for incorporating the detention faclhttes into multi-use facilities, such as soccer fields, etc B-3 EXHIBIT B B Develop a prehrmnary desagn of the proposed detention facilities at the sates ~dent~fied ~n Task II 1 Determine a stumble layout of each of the proposed regional detentton facflmes No more than three alternatxve layouts will be investigated at each s~te dunng the prehrmnary design phase The concerns of each neaghborhood will be addressed and incorporated rote the desagn, ff applacable 2 Develop a prehnunary design of the dam structure and primary and emergency spillways for each sate The design of the dam and spillways shall consider the erdstmg condmons and expected future development at each sxte C Refme the hydrologic and hydrauhc models to be consistent with the proposed detention facility layouts and spillways ~dentlfied m Item III B above D Refine the conceptual construction cost estimate to consider ~tems developed dunng the prehminary design phase E Assist the City wath the preparation of the necessary documentatton to be submitted to the TNRCC for approval of the regmnal detention faclhty design and to obtain the necessary pernuts for constructmn of the regional detentton fac~httes F Prepare the necessary mformataon needed for a subnuttal to the Federal Emergency Management Agency to obtain a Cond~taonal Letter of Map Rewsmn (CLOMR) G Prepare a report summanzmg the results of the preliminary design task, including recommendataons and ~dentltlcat~on of potential problem areas The report will be presented by the consultant to the C~ty at a coordmataon meeting B-4 EXHIBIT B DETAIEED SCOPE OF WORK FOR TASK 2: PECAN CREEK TRIB. PEC-4 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY PHASE I - RECONNAISSANCE & DATA COLLECTION A A coordmatton meeting will be held between the City and its consultant for the purpose of reviewing avatlable data for use dunng the study, reviewing the scope of the work to be done and the objecttves of the study, and to rewew the project personnel and their responsibilities for both the City and its consultant B Perform visit to the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed to observe the exastlng condmons of the channel The site wm will also include the preparation ora photograptuc record of the conditions that presently erdst along the channel, w~th particular attention focused on areas where potential design problems area anticipated C Coordinate w~th the Federal Emergency Management Agency to obtain the latest hydrologic and hydraulic computer models for Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 D Coordinate with survey subconsultaut to obtain field data, including the location and fimshed floor elevatton of structures adjacent to the creek, channel cross sectmns, and bridge/culvert data for the entire length of the stream E Coordinate with local utility compames to determine the presence of exastmg utility lines along Tributary PEC-4 PHASE H - PRELIMINARY DESIGN A Perform hydrauhc analysis of impact of the proposed channel ~mprovements to Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 1 Evaluate not more than three channel improvement scenarios to deterrmne the type ~ and extent of channel anprovements needed to ehnmnate the diversion of stormwater fi.om the PEC-4 watershed to the Pecan Creek watershed The intent of the channel nnprovement evaluatton wtll be to maintain the 100-year floodplmn within the channel banks as required by the City of Denton draanage criteria 2 Evaluate the need for increasing bridge/culvert sizes for the crossings along Tributary PEC-4 3 Dehneate on avmlable topograp~c maps the 100-year floodplaans for exastlng conditions and conditions with the proposed channel improvements m place B-5 EXHIBIT B 4 Prepare summary table of results of hydrauhc ailalysIS C Prepare a conceptual estunate of anucipated construction costs associated with the proposed channel improvement scenarios evaluated in the study A cost/benefit analysis will be made of each channel improvement scanano developed D Keview the Corps of Engineers regulatmns associated with 404 Pernuts and outline steps needed to obtain 404 Pernnt approval of the proposed channel improvements Potential problem areas, ifa. ny, will be also ldenttfied E Prepare the necessary mformaUon required for a subrmttal to the Federal Emergency Management Agency for a Conditnonal Letter of Map Revision (CLOIVI~) reflecting the proposed pla.nmng project F Summarize the results of the prehrmna~y design 1 Prepare a report summanzang the findings of the prelmunary design The following 1terns shall be included in the design report a Tabular comparison of floodplain elevations for erasttng channel conditions and condmons with the proposed channel improvements m place b Map showing the enttre watershed vath the locations of the proposed channel nnprovements, the locatton and type of bridge/culvert improvements needed, the horizontal location of the erastmg utilities that could pose a potential confhct with the channel ~mprovemants, and the 100-year floodplain hnuts for erdstmg condmons and condmons with the channel improvements in place c Cross secttons of the channel maprovements m sufficient detail to illustrate the type of improvements proposed d An estimate of the probable construction costs and total project costs of the channel improvements 2 Conduct a coordination meeting to discuss the results of the prehmma_ry desagn and the consultant's recommendations for proceeding with the project B-6 DETAILED TASK AND BUDGET ~lqiBrr c TASK I - COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION STUDY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TOTAL PROJECT $74 886 ExMl~rr c TASK 2 - PECAN CREEK FLOW DIVERSION MITIGATION STUDY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TOTAL PROJECT $46,076 EXHIBIT E John Lee Rutledge, P.E. Principal YEARS EXPERIENCE: With Th~s F~nn 10 W~th Other F~rms 0 EDUCATION: B S E, Clwl Engineenng, Duke University, 1983 M S E, Water Resources, Umvers~ty of Texas at Austin, 1985 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING: "Unsteady Flow Modehng Using DAMBRK and DWOPER," Umverslty of Texas at Austin, 1987 REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer, Texas #65045 Professional Engineer, Oklahoma #16255 Professional Engineer, Arkansas #8262 Professional Engineer, Louisiana #25581 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1985.Present: Freese and N~chols, Inc 1990 - Associate 1994 - Principal Mr Rutledge, a Pnnelpal of Freese and N~chols, serves as department manager m the hrm's Drainage and Flood Management Department Mr Rutledge ~s lexpenenced m hydrauhc and hydrologic studies as well as design of water resource projects He has served as a project manager and design coordinator for a number of dams and drmnage systems In addition, he, has performed numerous hydrauhc and hydrologic studies, including da~m breach analyses on e~ght major dams and Probable Maxamum Flood studies for ex~stmg and proposed projects Representative projects include: Drainage and Flood Studies · UpdateI of the PMF model of the SLX H~ghland Lakes Dams on the Colorado River for the Lower Colorado R~ver Authority using the National Weather Services dynam~c wave computer model, NETWORK. The drainage areas of the reservoirs ranged from 19,350 io 26,340 square miles Over 600 miles of river were modeled using the NETWORK model E-1 EXHIBIT E · ProJect Manager for the Cahbrat~on of the National Weather Serwce's M~ss~ss~ppMlhnms-Mlssoun's DWOPER model utflmng the 1993 flood Included 250 miles of the M~sslss~pp~ Paver, 265 miles of the Ilhnms Paver, and 100 miles of the Mlss~ss~pp~ Paver Purpose of the study was to prepare data descn'b~ng the 1993 flood, including the numerous levee breaches and perform the cahbrat~on of the model Project Manager for design of $14 mflhon of drainage faclht~es assocmted v~th a proposed runway at the Dallas-Fort Worth International An'port and 404 pern~ttmg, ~ncludmg wetland m~tlgat~on development Breach analyses for e~ght major dams, including Morns Sheppard Dam Probable Mammum Flood analyses for Eagle Mountain Lake and Lake Bridgeport for Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District No One, including the development of a flood routing model for Lake Bridgeport and Eagle Mountmn Reservoir using the DWOPER model for Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District Number One Project Manager for the prehmmary design and permitting of a channel dam and development of Johnson Creek for the Texas Rangers, assocmted w~th the Ballpark at Arhngton Permits included water rights, 404, and FEMA CLOMR · Flood routing studies, ~nclud~ng the PMF, associated vath the design of Palo Duro Reservoir for the Palo Duro Paver Authority Flood routing studies, including PMF, for the Alan Henry Project for the Brazos Paver Authority · Flood routing studies, including PMF, for Maehell County Reservmr for the Colorado Paver Munlmpal Water D~stnet · Flood routing studies, lncludmg PMF, for the Durant Raw Water Storage Reservoir for the C~ty of Durant, Oklahoma · Preliminary design of the Belzora Landing Reservmr for the Sabine Paver Authority, including flood studies using the Natmnal Weather Sermce's DWOPER model · Prehmmary design of the spillway system for the Cape G~rardeau/Bolhnger County Recreation Reservmrs, ~ncludmg design flood development · Prehmlnary design of proposed modifications to Lake Arlington Dam for the C~ty of Arhngton, including PMF flood studies using the DWOPER model. · Development of gate operating procedures for the proposed South Bend Reservoir for the Brazos Paver Authority, Lake Bridgeport and Eagle Mountain Reservoir for the Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District Number One, and Lake Conroe for the San E-2 EXHIBIT E Jaclnto River Authority The Lake Conroe project involved the development of a computerized gate operating program tied to an ex~stmg ALERT telemetry system of rainfall and lake level gages · Early warmng system for 17 low water crossing of the C~ty of San Antomo, including automated on-s~te warmng features · Updated PMF Study on the Morns Sheppard Dam for the Brazos R~ver Authority, utlhzmg the DWOPER model The drmnage area of the dam ~s about 13,000 square miles Project Manager for redesign of drainage channel adjacent to Harris Hospital Northwest in Azle, Texas Work included a CLOMR from · Project Manager for permitting and design of a 4 5 mile levee and floodwall for the City of Dberty, Texas along the Tnmty River · Project Manager for the Lower Neches Valley Authority canal hydrauhe study usang the dynamm wave program, DWOPER · Project Manager for the floodplain development perma for the Carter Ranch for a levee m the floodplain of the Trm~ty River Dam and Embankment Design · Project Engineer for Palo Duro Dam for the Palo Duro R~ver Authority · Project Engineer for the Lake Alan Henry ProJect for the Brazos River Authority · Project Engineer for a raw water storage reservoir for the C~ty of Durant, Oklahoma · Project Manager and Project Engineer for the proposed Mitchell County Dam for the Colorado R~ver Mumc~pal Water D~stnct · Design of portions of S W Freese Dam for the Colorado R~ver Mume~pal Water D~stnct · Project Engineer for the feasibility study and prehm~nary design of the proposed Belzora Landing Reservoir for the Sabine R~ver Authority · Project Engineer for the feasibility study and prehm~nary design of recreational dam for Cedars Camps m M~ssoun · Prehmmary design of the spillway system for the proposed Cape G~rardeau/Bolhnger Counties (Missouri) Recreation Reservmrs · ProJect Manger for Sulphur Springs Draw and Red Lake Dams for Colorado River Mumc~pal Water D~strmt · Project Manager for the design of an RCC Channel Dam ~n the Sabine R~ver for the Sabine R~ver Authority · Project Manager for the design of the 114 MG Terminal Storage Reservoir for the C~ty of K~lgore E-3 EXHIBIT E · Project Manager for the design of 100 MG Terminal Storage Reservoir for the Colorado Raver Mumclpal Water District Fm~F.a~: - hm::HC:Xa Dam Inspect]onfRepmr · Twenty dam safety inspections of major dams · Project Engineer for the rehabilitation of Natural Dam for the Colorado River Mumcipal Water District. · Project Engineer for the rehabihtat]on of Little Fhnt Creek Dam for Southwestern Electric Power Company · Design of the emergency spillway and fuse plug as part of the Morns Sheppard Dam Rehabilitation for the Brazos River Authority. Project Manager for the design of the Morns Sheppard Stilling Basin F_~ten$1on · ProJect Manager for the repair of South Prong Dam for the City of Waxahachie, which included a 1300' RCC overflow emergency spillway · Project Manager for the repair of the Hubbard Creek Spillway for the West Central Texas Municipal Water District, wluch included innovative conduit extension walls to prevent recurnng damage The concept was developed through the use of a physical model study Sedimentation Surveys · Sedimentation surveys for Eagle Mountain Reservoir and Lake Bridgeport for Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District No One · Sedimentation surveys for Stryker Creek Lake for TU Electric Water Resource Planning · ProJect Manager on the preliminary design, permit appheatlon and heanng process for Mitchell County Reservoir · Project Manager for two feasibility studies revolving lnterbasm water transfers through emstmg canal systems for the Sabine and San Jacmto Raver Authontles and the Lower Neehes Valley Authority · Project Manager for the long range water supply of a ten-county area in central Texas Construction Administration · Resident Representative for the construction of the Richland- Chambers Dam for the Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement Dlstrmt Number One · Resident Representative for the rehablhtatlon of Lattle Fhnt Creek Dam, a slurry trench installation for Southwestern Electric Power Company E-4 EXHIBIT E · Project'Engineer for the General Representation of Palo Duro and Alan HenD, Dam Projects · Project Manager for the General Representation of Mitchell County Dam, Durant Raw Water Storage Reservoir, and Sulphur Spnngs Draw Dams · ProJect Manager for th~ General Representation of the Moms Sheppard Stilling Basin Extension and Hubbard Creek Spillway Repair · Project Manager for the General Representation of the galgore Tern'anal Storage Facility · Project Manager for the General Representation of the South Prong Dam Rehabilitation Project. PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES: American Society of Clxal Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers Texas Society of Professional Engineers AWARDSfltONORS. Phi Beta Kappa Chi Epsllon Tau Beta Pi Summa Cum Laude, Duke University John A. Foeht Presidential Endowment Graduate Scholarship, University of Texas PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS' "A Methodology for Calibration of Mannmg's Roughness Coefficients for an Unsteady Flow Model," Masters Thesis, 1985 "Correction of Seepage Through an Earthfill Dam in Arkansas," co-authored vath Ronme M Lemons, presented to the Texas Section of ASCE, Spring 1987 E-5 EXHIBIT E "Correct~on of Seepage Through an Earthflll Dam," co-authored vnth Ronme M Lemons and Bill R Elsbury of McClelland Engineers, presented at the 16th Congress of the International Commission on Large Dams, 1988 "Increasing Spillway Capacity to Allow Passage of the PMF at Moms Sheppard Dam," presented at the 6th Annual Conference of the Assoelatmn of State Dam Safety Officials, October 1989 "Natural Dam Emergency Repairs," co-authored wath Ronnle M Lemons, presented at the Texas Seetmn of ASCE, Fall 1989 "Prehm~nary Report of the Feas~blhty of an Interbasln Water Transfer Through Emstmg Canal Systems," co-authored wath Ronme Lemons, presented at ASCE Water Resources Planning and Management D~ws~on, 17th National Conference, April 1990 "Use of a Hydrauhc Routing Model for PMF Development to Reduce Conservatmn of Calibrated Empmcal Routing Methods," presented at ASCE Water Resources Planmng and Management D~ws~on, 17th Natmnal Conference, April 1990 and at the 12th Annual U S Committee on Large Dams, April 1992 "Innovative Spillway Design," co-authored vath Dr J Paul Tulhs of Utah State Umvemty, presented at the ASCE Hydrauhcs D~v~s~on, July 1990 "Rehabilitation of Dams for Planned Overtopping," co-authored w~th Ronme M Lemons, P E and John R Kang, P E., presented at the 7th Annual Conference of the Association of State Dam Safety Offimals, October 1990 "Development of a Real-time Flood Forecasting and Spillway Gate Operations Model," presented at the 4th Annual m~d-year techmeal conference of the Texas Water Conservation Assoc~atmn, July 1991 "Lake Conroe Gate Operating Program," presented at the Texas Section of American Water Resources, December 1992 "Use of NETWORK Flood Routing Model to Reduce PMF's at Lower Colorado R~ver Authority Dams," presented at the ASCE WaterPower '93 Conference m Nashxqlle, TN ~n August 1993 and at the 10th Annual Conference of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials, October 1993 E-6 EXHIBIT E "Use of Physical Hydrauhc Models for Spillway Rehabilitation," presented at the Fourteenth Annual USCOLD Lecture Series, .lune 1994. "Cahbratlon of M~sslss~pp~-Illlnols-M~ssoun River System for 1993 Flood," presented at the Annual Conference of the Assoemt~on of State Dam Safet~ Officials, September 1994 "Determining Des~gu Floods More Accurately wnh State-of-the-Art Computer Models," pubhshed an Hydro Review, Volume XIII, Number 6, August 1994 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES' Umted Way Annual Campmgn for Tarrant County, Secuon Chairman, 1988 to 1994; Division Chmrman 1994 Leadership Fort Worth Board Member, Streams and Valleys E-7 EXHIBIT E Michael J. Dellies, P.E. C:vd Engineer YEARS EXPERIENCE: W~th Th~s Firm 11 W~th Other Firms: 0 EDUCATION: M S, Ovfl Eng~neenng, Umvers~ty of Texas at Arhngton, 1994 B S, Clwl Englneenng, Texas Tech University, 1983 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING: HEC-1 - Floodplain Hydrology, Umvers~ty of Texas, 1985 HEC-2 - Floodplain Hydrauhcs, Umvers~ty of Texas, 1985 International Symposium on Urban Hydrology, Hydrauhc Infrastructures and Water Ouahty Control, Umvers~ty of Kentucky, 1985 Conference on Stormwater Management, Stormwater Modehng, Flood Frequency Analys~s, and Stormwater Detention, Texas A&M Umvers~ty, 1986 Intergraph Inroads Computer Software Seminar, Huntsville, Alabama, 1989 WSPRO Water Surface Profile Computation Seminar, 1993 Underground Detention Designs for Stormwater Management, 1994 NPDES Stormwater Permit Comphanee, 1994 SWMM Model for Stormwater and CSO Management, 1994 REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer, Texas #65938, 1989 Mr Delhes ~s an assocmte engineer and project manager for a number of Freese and N~chols' civil engmeenng projects, meludmg floodwater management studies, street and s~te drainage systems, municipal and lndustrml master drainage plan development, sate grading plans, channel ~mprovement studies and designs, and detention pond designs Mr Dellles has attended special tralmn8 seminars m stormwater management, stormwater modehng, flood frequency analysis and stormwater detention as well as ~n urban hydrology, hydrauhc infrastructures and water quahty control E-8 EXHIBIT E Representat~v~ ~projects include: ProJect Englneer for water Dwerslon study for the City of Grapevane Effects of diverting drainage between adjacent watersheds was evaluated · Project Engineer for the development of a master drainage plan for the City of Denton The project included development of storm drainage criteria, drainage manual and a regional detention study for the H~ekory Creek watershed · ProJect Enl0neer for the development of a master drainage plan for the C~ty of Grapexane The project mcluded estabhshmg GPS monuments throughout the city, preparation of new topographic maps, evaluating over 900 storm dram inlets and 500 storm dram p~pe segments, and f~eld surveys to obtain over 475 cross sections for development of 17 HEC-2 hydrauhc stream models covenng over 30 stream miles · Project Engineer for detention pond and storm dram design to provade flood m~t~gat~on m estabhshed neighborhood of Fort Worth Assisted m development of the Clear Creek West Drainage Plan for the C~ty of Copperas Cove The plan included hydrology and hydrauhcs for the development of ~mproved storm drainage systems throughout the watershed · Project Manager/Engineer for the development of drainage studies and plans and specd~cat~ons for storm dram ~mprovements ~n the Park Place, Parra L~nda Estates and Placid Peninsula subdlwslons m Grapexafie ProJect Englneer for the design of street drainage for plant roadways for Tnmty R~ver Authority Central Treatment Plant and American Aarhnes maintenance faeflmes · ProJect Engineer for the re-evaluation of all HEC-2 hydrauhc stream models w~thm the C~ty of Abflene for the Federal Emergency Management Agency flood insurance re-study · Project Engineer for floodway reahgnment project for the C~ty of Farmers Branch · ProJect Engineer for floodplmn analys~s m connection vath Loyola Lane Bridge ~mprovements for the C~ty of Austin · Floodway/floodplain dehneat~on study for the City of Grapexane · Floodplain reclamation for the City of Fort Worth · Project Manager for flood abatement study of North P~ttman Creek for the City of Plano · Verlheat~on of floodway mapping m Sherman, Texas · Master drainage plan for Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth EXHIBIT E S~te grading plan, floodplain reclamation design, and study of various floodplain analyses to determine effects of development on adjacent streams ~r=ss-r~c~:~s · Water and sewer systems relocations related to expansion of S.H 26 in Grapewne, Texas. · Quanmy and cost estimates for several street unprovement projects in Tarrant County PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES: American Society of C~wl Engineers National Society of Professional Engineers Texas Society of Professmnal Engineers HONORS AND AWARDS: Chi Epsdon National C]wl Eng~neenng Honor Socmty TSPE Young Enl0neer of the Year, 1994-95 PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS' "Master Planmng Develops Solutions to Drmnage Problems and Rebmlds Infrastructure Data Base," presented at the Texas Sect]on ASCE Spnng Convent]on, Waco, Texas, April 1995 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: Arhngton Big BrothersfB]g Sisters E-10 EXHIBIT E Ronald G. King Water Resources Engineer YEARS EXI~ERIENCE: With This Firm 4 With Other F~rms 2 EDUCATION: B S Civil Eng~neenng, University of Texas at Arlington, May 1991 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1991.Present: Freese and N~chols, Inc, Eng~neer-~n-Tralnmg for Water Resources Des:gn Department Mr K~ng's experience includes work on several water resource studies and design and construction projects Representative projects include: · Bay C~ty Dam - Project Engineer for preliminary des:eh of modifications · Gibbons Creek Dam - Project Engmeer for breach analys~s using DAMBRK and annual safety mspect~ons · SWEPCO - Project Engineer for annual and b~-annual :nspectlons of power plant reservoir dams :n East Texas and Lou~smna. · Project Engineer for the update of the PMF model of the SLX I-I~ghland Lakes Dams on the Colorado River for the Lower Colorado R:ver Authority using the National Weather Scrwce NETWORK model The drainage areas ranged from 19,350 to 26,340 square miles Over 600 mdes of river were modeled using the NETWORK model Also Project Eng:neer for dam stab:hty analys~s, and physical hydrauhc model of the Buchanan seven-gate sp:llway · Sulphur Springs Draw Dam - Project Engineer for prehm~nary and final design, :nclud~ng all flood routing South Prong Dam (Lake Waxahachle) - Project Engineer for prehmlnary and final design and resident project representative for construction · Hubbard Creek Dam - Project Engineer for hydrauhc model of spillway and final design of spillway rehabd~tat~on General Representative for construction of spdlway rehabflnat~on Project included construction of conduit extension walls and repmr of stllhng basra flood dam for flood d~scharge stabilization Project Engineer for the Cahbrat:on of the National Weather Serv~ce's M~ss~sslpp:-Ilhno~s-M~ssourfs DWOPER model utilizing the E-11 EXHIBIT E 1993 flood Included 250 miles of the Massassippi River, 265 miles of the Ilhnoas River, and 100 miles of the Missouri river. Purpose o£ the study was to prepare data descn"olng the 1993 flood, mcludmg the numerous levee breaches and perform the calibration of the model · Project Engineer for the update of. the Emergency Action Plan for Lattle Flint Creek Dam near Gentry, Arkansas for Southwestern Electric Power Company Included update of the dam breach model usmg HEC-1 and DAMBRK, and compllataon of a plan in ease of emergencies such as a breach · Project engineer for the breach analysis of Longhorn Dam on the Colorado Raver in Austin and Decker Dam on Decker Creek near Austin, Texas DAMBRK was used to create the breach outflow hydrograph and DWOPER was used to route the flood wave downstream to the Caty of Bastrop · Project engineer for the design of the flood control levee around the Caty of Laberty, Texas. The levee vail be approximately $ miles on the bluff between the city and the Tnnlty River floodplain, and roll include a combination of earthf'fll levees and structural floodwalls PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES American Society of C~vll Engineers ~I'ONORS AND AWARDS: Chi Epsflon Nataonal Civil Engmeenng Honor Society President, UTA Chapter, 1990-1991 Joe Rady Dlstmgmshed Senior Award, 1990-1991 Marvin C Nichols Paper Contest Award, 1994 E-12 EXHIBIT E Curtis B. Beitel Water Resources Engineer YEARS EXPERIENCE: With Th~s F~rm 1 W~th Other F~rms 0 EDUCATION: B S C~wl Engmeenng, Texas A&M Umvers~ty, May 1993 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE' 1993.Present Freese and N~chols, Inc, Eng~neer-m-Trmmng for Water Resources Design Department 1991-1993. Freese and N~chols, Inc, Cooperative Education Posmon for Water Resources Design Department Mr Beltel is an engmeer m the Water Resources Department Representative projects include: Project Engineer for the development of a levee algorithm for the NWS operational model The levee model calculates both overtopping and breach flows between the river and the levees · Project Engineer for the Cahbrat~on of the National Weather Senaee's M~ss~ss~pp~-Ilhno~s-M~ssoun DWOPER model uUhzmg the 1993 flood Included 250 miles of the M~ss~ss~pp~ Raver, 265 m~les of the Ilhno~s Raver, and 100 miles of the M~ssoun river Purpose of the study was to prepare data describing the 1993 flood, including the numerous levee breaches and perform the cahbrat~on of the model · City of San Antomo - Project Engineer for design of an Automated Low Water Crossmg Warning System, to be momtored by an ALERT telemetry system · Edwards Underground Water D~strlct - ProJect Engineer for prehmmary design of Indmn Creek Recharge Reservoir, ~ncludmg all flood routing · City of Arhngton - Project Engineer for the development of a flood forecasting model for Lake Arhngton The model was developed for use w~th a spreadsheet · Developed several large hydrologic and hydrauhc computer models of the Colorado Raver near Austm using the National Weather Services' NETWORK The PMF update for the s~x H~ghland Lakes Dams owned by the Lower Colorado Raver Authority utilized HEC-1 to model up to 26,000 square miles of drmnage area and NETWORK to model over 600 miles of river channel E-13 EXHIBIT E · ProJect Engineer for the Cahbration of the National Weather Semce's Mlsslssippl-Ilhnols-M~ssoun's DWOPER model utihzang the 1993 flood Included 250 miles of the Mississippi River, 265 miles of the Ilhnms River, and 1~ miles of the M~ssoun river Pu~ose of the study was to prepare data describing the 1~3 flood, Including the numerous levee breaches and peffom the calibration of the model * Sulphur Draw Dam - Conducted the prellmma~ feas~bfllW study Developed ~o large lo.ran pro.ams for the study. ~so pamc~pated ~n the dcs~ and construction representation ~ ~ke Wo~h Dam - Detemed the uplift forces on a RCC slab overlay * ~ke Ray Robe.s - Developed the ~al cost estimate for the $13 mflhon water treatment plant m Denton, Texas ~s was a detailed cost estimate produced fora scratch on a spreadsheet * ~ke Brazos Dam - ~s~sted in the prehmlna~ desl~ of mod~flcatmns Cl~ of Durant - ~Slsted ~th the quantities for the Durant Raw Water Storage Resc~mr PROFESSION~ SOCIE~ES: ~socmte Member - ~encan Soc~e~ of O~1 En~neers COMPU'I~R EXPERIENCE. Lotus, Symphony, Quattro Pro, Autocad, Harvard Graphics, M~crosoft ProJect 1 0, Windows, WordPerfect 5 1, HEC-1, HEC-2, HMR-52, DWOPER, KYPIPE, Fortran, VAX-VMS, HP 48SX, Applesoft Basic HONORS AND AWARDS: Chi Epsllon National Clwl Engineering Honor Society Pledge Marshall, A&M Chapter, 1992-1993 Tau Beta P1 National Engmeenng Honor Society Phi Eta Sigma National Freshman Honor Society Dean's Honor Roll, Spnng 1992 Ill E-14 CITY OF DENTON August 17, 1995 Michael Delhes, P E ProJect Manager Freese and Nichols, lnc 811 Lamar Street FortWorth, TX 76102 Dear Make The City of Denton would hke to provide the following assurances to the Texas Water Development Board for the 1995 Grant Apphcat~on 1 Tins planning effort is not duplicated m other City programs We have enclosed a copy of our CIP that shows that some major funding is proposed m the two areas for structural nuprovements However, no funds are programmed for an), studaes that master plan these two major drainage basins The only flood study currently programmed Is for a Downtown Drainage Planmng Study for 1997-98 wnh a total of $60,000 programmed Tins does not anver PEC-4 but concentrates on the mare branch and north branch of Pecan Creek as,they flow through the Central Busmess Dasmct 2 The C!ty of Denton is connmtted to pursue wable soluUens that result fi.om these stuches and plsnmng efforts The enclosed CIP shows Denton's eommatment to funding structural maprovemants but not adequately funding master planning stuthes for these two regmnal basins 3 The City of Denton has an excellent lustovy vath the FAA and others of meeting its reqmred level of participation m grants that reqmre City matcbang funds The City of I)enton wall meet its obhgaUon using General Fund Revenues or Bond Funds depending on the amount and t~rmng of the matcbang funds 4 The City of Denton is currently at Level Nme m the Commumty Rating S3 stem of the Nataoual Flood Insurance Program Our flood plato management and subchvislon regulauon ordinances exceed the mmunum requirements slgmficantly Our commumty number is 480194 David Salmon ~s the current flood plato admmastrator Finally, all the land areas to be studied are e:ther m the City of Denton or :ts Extraterntonal Sunsdictlon The PEC-4 basra Is m the central pomon of the incorporated area and 90% plus of the Cooper Creek basra ~s mslde the C:ty Lmuts If you need further lnformat;on, please adws¢ Sincerely, JDlr~to~r o ~and Transportation CITY OF DENTON August 24, 1995 Jack Wagu~- Actmg D~rector of Publm Works Denton County Pubhc Works Department 306 N Loop 288 Denton, TX 76201 Dear Mr Wagner The Cxty of Denton ~s subnuttmg a grant apphcat~on to the Texas Water Development Board for Flood proteeaon plaunmg The grant vnll address two regional areas that are wathm the jurls(hcaon of your poht~cal body They are as follows, 1 Cooper Creek Regmnal Detentmn Tlus project will study and prowde potentml regmnal detentmn ponds on Cooper Creek to address eyastmg and future flooding ~ssues 2 Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 Flow D~verslon M]t]gataon\Channel Improvements This project vail study and prowde structural channel and culvert unprovements recommendaUons along the branch of Peean Creek that runs from the northeast comer of UNT to Ruddell through Southeast Denton Please be adxased that the recommendataons proposed will be prowded to you for your input and mformat~on during flus plaunmg process Any comments or concerns that you have would be forwarded to the C~ty of Denton and Mr Craig Pederson at the Texas Water Development Board I would be happy to discuss the apphcaUon w~th you at any tune ffyou desire Sincerely, J~ Clark,/P E D~reetor of Engineering and Transportation Z 772 284 795 I. your ]~I~L~)]~=~.~ oompleted on the rever~e elde? ~ Recmpt for I ~ ~" ...... ~ Ce~,f,ed Ma,I Sla and ZiP Code ~enton~ TX 76201 ~111~ TWDBF Grant Applscat~ Letter I _ ~ ...... g~ ~_ tnJ~eelpt ~e~e. CITY OF DENTON DENTOI~ 7X 76~0 I August 24,, 1995 Dr Albert Thomas, PHD Superintendent of Schools Denton Independent School District 1307 N Locust Denton, TX 76201 Dear Dr Thomas The City of,Denton ~s subnuttmg a grant apphcatlon to the Texas Water Development Board for Flood protection plamung The grant will address two regional areas that are within thejuns&ctlon of your poht~cal body They are as follows, 1 Cooper Creek Regional Detention Ttus project will study and provide potentml regional detention ponds on Cooper Creek to address eyastmg and future flooding issues 2 Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 Flow D~vers~on M~t~gataon\Channel Improvements Tlus project will study and provldelslXuctural channel and culvert nnprovemcnts recommendauons along the branch of Pecan Creek that runs fi.om the northeast corner of UNT to Ruddell through Southeast Denton Please be adwsed that the recommendations proposed will be provided to you for your input and mfonnatmn during flus planning process Any comments or concerns that you would have would be forwarded to the City of Denton and Mr Crm§ Pedersen at the Texas Water Development Board I would be happy to &scuss the apphcation with you at any tune if you desue Smeerely, ~ D~reetor of Engmeenng and Transportation Z 772 284 793 Receipt for Certified Maml layour RETURN ADDRESS completed on the reveme side ,~{~ ~,~f~ Do not uae for lnternational Mafl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {See Reverse) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dr. Albert Thomas, PH~ ~ ~ '~'lreetandNo 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 1307 N Locust = ~o = ~ Denton, TX 76201 ~ ~ · ~ Return R,Celp~ Showing to Whom O ~ August 24, 1995 ~M~ ~ TWDBF Grant Applmcat~ n ~ ~ m Letter ~ ~ ~ ~ Thank ~u~o~ u~l~ Return Receipt 1996-2000 CAI~ITAL' IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM [ 1995-96 BUDGET CALENDAR January 17 - Tuesday Du~a~oa of Pnontaes Que~onnatre vath C:ty Council ~ C~ty Co~mefl briefing oa Capital Improvement Program . January 20 - Friday Pnonty Quesao~na~re ehslnbuted to C~ty Counal Sanuaty 27 -Fnday C~ty Coeaefl returas Budget Pnonty Que~onaan'e .~ February 7 - Tuesday Re'aew and &seus~non of Budget Priority Quesaonnatre results w~th C~ty Council Pubh¢ Ulihties Board and Plamung and Zoning Comm~.ss~on hold a pubh¢ heanng to February 8 - Wedaesday receive input from the e~amumty regarding Capital Impwvemeat Program ~'] February 22 - Wednesday Staff Capital Improvemeat Prosram Budget kickoff ~i] March 10 -Fnday Captial Improvement Program requests due m Budget Office for rewew and analysas Mar~h 15 - Wednesday Oeneral Goverameat fi/th year Capatal Improvement requests are presented to Execuuve ~ Commatiee for eonadenmoa {-~ March 20 - Monday Exeeuttve ComrmUee r,,,,knngs of capital unpwvement pro~eets due to Budget Office March 23 - Thtu-'~,day Executive Commatlee chscusston of capital unprovement project priority ranlaugs April 5 - Wednesday Pubhe Utlht~es Board reeaves prehnunary draft of Utahtiea Capflal Improvement April 7 - Friday Execuuve Committee re, news General Government requests fonnulatm$ recorameadauon m be forwarded to Plsuamg and Zomng Comnusaou  April 26 - Wednesday Pubhc Utlllt~e~ Boant holds a work se~aon to review UtflRies Capflal Improvement May 3 - Wednesday Pubhe Utilities Board final Utility Capital Improvement Program recommendatiou May l 0 - Wednesday Plannm{~ and Zoom! Cornm~saton discusses the Capital Improvement Program "~ May 24 - Wednesday Plamung and Zomn$ Comnussaon holds a pubh¢ heanng tn a specaal meetm$, and .~ June 6- Tuesday Recommtmded five-year Cap~tal Improvement Program presented to City Council for cous~derat~on. September 12 - Tuesday City Council adopts Capital Improvement Program budget (first year of Capital Improvement Prosram) 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM prelect Title ~ ~ MISCELLANEOUS STREET RECONSTRUC'rlON ~a cun'ont ClP Pro, Ct? ~ Yes _~X No Prolact Description/Location econstruct~on would include new asphalt pavement by bomagg;ng and Use C t7 forces to reconstruct ex~stmg streetS,, ~R~ r~nmrRd as needed Staff would recommend streets and dec;drag body overlaymg Concrete curbs and dnveways wi u= would choose Pro~ect Purpose/Justification Many streets ~n Denton have secttons that are tn poor repair but not the whole street Also, some streets have poor asphalt condlttons, but curb and gutter are acceptable Enables selection of specific malor street repairs the actual year of the program COAftructlOA FUAAfAff 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Tot~ ~d~e (~1,000'S] ~ ~ 0 Bonds - ,ssue 0 AuthonzedlUmssued Bonds 150 150 UnauthonzedlUmssued Bonds 0 A,d m Const;uctton 0 Other ~ 0 ~ 150 Tot~ 0 0 0 ~ Fu~ 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998 99 1999~ Tot~ ~= 8 8 Se~,ces 142 142 Land (R~ght of~way) 0 Constructton 0 Other ~ 0 150 1 ~0 Tot~ 0 0 0 O~atl~ Budget 1998-99 1999~0 Torn o 0 Supphes 0 Mamtenance 0 Se~iceS 0 Debt Se~Lce 0 insurance 0 F~xed Assets ~ 0 0 Total 0 0 0  me IlK e~M s=ce of opting f~ds. ~ ~ ~ ~No ~ - ~--~ Yes, approx;mate amount annually. 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project TitJe ~ MAYHILL/LOOP 288 CONNECTOR ROAD Project#o, ,, <,, 0010-132 [Montie~ar).~ ~ 'aid COP~ Completed ReqttsStlng Dept. Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Feb-00 Apr-00 Estimated Coct $776,000 End Jan-00 Mar-00 Aug-00 Is this mt update or revision of 8 current CIP Project? Project Description/Location Construct a 45'-w~de road w~th curb and gutter hnk~ng Mayhdl Road wKh Loop 288 just south of Russell-Newman plant Prolect includes traffic signal at Loop 288 for $100,000 Project Purpose/Justification Prowde alternative access to Billy Ryan H~gh School, and potentially, the Denton County Government Center located on Market Street Would also prowde potential access to FEMA Would reduce congestion at McKmney and Loop 288 and could eliminate some dangerous dnveway maneuvers Cons~'u~gon Fun~ng Schedule f~1.000'$) 1996-96 1996-B7 1997-98 !99B.99 19994)0 Total Ex~st~ng Bonds - issue 0 Authonzed/Umssued Bonds 0 Unauthonzed/Unissued Bonds 776 77§ A~d m Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 776 776 Con~uucfon Fund/n~ Costs f~l, O00'$i 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998.99 1999-00 Total Services 131 131 Land (R~ght-of-way) 0 Construction ~45 545 Other 100 100 Total 0 0 0 0 776 776 Operating Costs (~1,000's) 1995-96 1996 97 1997-98 1998-99 19994)0 Total Personal Services 0 Supphes 0 Mmntenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 insurance 0 F~xed Assets 0 Total 0 0 O 0 0 0 Please list expected source of operating funds WIll this project result In eny savings? __ Yes, approximate amount annually X No 30A9 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONCRETE DRAINAGE CHANNELS ~LANEOUS ....... Feb 00 ~ent CIP Project? ? ~X No Vanous locations in Denton Make major repmrs to ex~stmg concrete channels Select,on of specific tocatmns to be made pnor to destgn/b~ddmg process Staff to provtde input and recommendations to selecting body --~ect Purpose/Justification Many ex~sttng concrete channels are broken up or severely cracked Amounts required to make these repatrs ~s above what operating budget will support Plan ~s to make repairs m order to avoid hawng to completely rebutld later Consm~eEdn FU~[rig~ 1995-96 1996.97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total 0 Ex~st~ng Bonds - ~ssue _ .- 0 AuthonzedlUn~ssued Bonds 125 ~ 25 Ur~uthonzedlUmssued Bonds 0 A~d m Constructmn 0 Other' 0 125 ~ 25 Tota{ 0 0 0 Const~uCtlo~ Futtdlng 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 199B-99 1999 O0 Totat Cos~ [~1,000',~}~ 12 2 Services 0 Land (R~ght-of-wa~) 113 113 Construction 0 Other 0 125 125 ~ Total 0 0 0 Operating 81ud~et 1998-99 1999-00 Totat Costs (~?.000~$) 1995-96 1996 97 1997-98 0 Personal Services 0 Supphes 0 Maintenance 0 Sew~ces 0 Debt Se~ice 0 Insurance 0 Rxed Assets 0 0 ~ Total 0 0 0 0 Plon~e fist expe;ted source of operating funds y savings? Yes, approximate amount annually ~996-2000 ~..~, P. rk Parki~ Lot Pavt~ r ,, ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 10/~ 1~/98 0~/~ p~J~t ~rJ~J~L~t Jm This proJ~t w~ll provl~ for the assail Mack, D~I8, o~ North Lakes ~rks P~j~t ~JatJfl~tle ThlS proj~t MILL pro~ . higher ~[ity of ~rk)~ surface for the ~ers as ~i[ 8s ~a~e the .esther{cs of the ~ 1~-~ 1~ 1~ ~, ,1~ 1~ Total Ex~stl~ B~ - ~8s~ 0 AuthorizN~tss~ B~8 0 ~neuthorl zN/UnlSS~ B~s 500 500 A~d Jfl C~cr~tl~ 0 0 Other Total 0 0 0 0 500 500 Serv~c~ 40 Le~ (Right-of-way) ;~tr~t{~ 0 Other Total 0 0 0 0 500 0 Parsul Services o S~L I es Total 0 0 0 0 2 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM l~r_nj~c_-~ Title MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS ~ ~: ~' 0010-B7 ~ ~ ~) ~ ,,D~lgn 8Id Co~ ~m~et~ .... ~g;Dept, ~ Eng~neenng & Trans n ~ / Jan 00 Mar-00 Jun-00 ~t~ C~t ~ 219,000 ~ DescHptlonlLoc~lon ~oject traffic control signals at ~o intersections to be determ~d ~n the prolect year Pr~e~ Purpose/Justlflc~lon ~owde stgnafizatl~n at tntersect;ons on an as-needed bBs~s ~_~ ,[~ ?, 00~) .... 199~6 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999~0 T~ ~st~ng Bonds - ~ssue 0 A~honzed/Umssued Bonds 0 U~uthor~zed/Un~ssued Bonds 219 219 A~d m Construction ~er 0 Total 0 0 0 0 219 219 C~ (~1~O00's) 199~96 1996-97 1997-98 1998 99 1999~0 Tot~ Sew~ces 37 37 ~nd (R~ght of-way) 2 Co~truct~on 180 180 ~ 0 Other ; Tot~ 0 0 0 0 219 219 ~atlnE ~ (~I,000'~) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999~0 To~ Personal Sew~ces; 0 Sup~hes 0 Mamtenance 0  Seduces 0 Debt Sewlce 0 I~urance 0  ~m~ Assets 0 ~ Tot~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~-- ~ ~e list expe~ source of oper~ng funds I 1 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title PACE DRIVE DRAINAGE Projeat #~ ~ 0810-69 tMont/l/'Yemr) '~ ~ ...... ~ C~r~ct, Co~i~d' Requesting Dept. Englneenng & Trans Begin J 0ct-99 Feb-O0 Apr-00 Estimated Co~t: $953,000 End ~ Jan-O0 Mar 00 Sap-00 Is this an update or revision of a currant ClP Project? __ Yes X No Project Description/Location Construct a hned channel from the south end of Pace Drive south to McKinney Street New box culverts under McK;nney Street and grass channel south of McKmney Street Project Purpose/Juatlfication Th~s entire area has exceptionally flat topography and floods during heavy rains Several homes have reported flooding Severe water damage to one home on the south s~de of McKmney Street Construction Fur, ding Schedule f~?,O00'$) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Exmt~ng Bonds - ~ssue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 953 953 A~d ~n Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 953 953 Costs(*l,0OO's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Sarwces 153 153 Land (Right-of-way) 50 50 Construction ~50 750 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 953 953 Operating Budget Costs [~1,000'sJ 1995-96 1996 97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Personal Services 0 Supphes 0 Mamtenance 0 Serwces 0 Debt Serwce 0 Insurance F~xed Assets 0 o Total 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0 Please list expected source of operating funds I Will this project result In any savings? __ Yes, approximate amount annually }{ No 3o78 1~96-2000 ~~k Ba~Lftetd L~gh~t~ .~ Is ~J8 m te ~ ~isim ~ a ~t ClP Pm ~ y~ x Mo Thts pro]~ Mill aL~ for the ~tghC~ o~ ~he 3 C~-~LL f~eL~ L~aC~ a~ Evers Park p~j~t ~/J~tjft~t1~ p~ov3~ a h~he~ ~ttty service for y~th 0 0 Ex~stln9 Bo~:l~ - Is~ 0 0 Author I z~/Unt u~hort z~/UnJSS~ Bo~s 0 A~d in C~tr~ti~l 0 0 other 0 Totm[ 0 0 0 Settees 0 0 L~ (R~ght-of-way)~ 67 Other 0 Tota[ 0 0 0 services o o Se~J ces 0 0 O~t ServJce 0 0 FJx~ Asset~ 0 Toter 0 0 0 CJW of O~t~ G~ra~ F~ ~ratJ~ B~et ~01FSF/Btank 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title PECAN CREEK KERLEY TO MORSE Requesting Dept Englneenng & Trans I Begin I Oct~99 Mar-O0 May-00 Estimated Cost $496,000 [ End I Feb-00 Apr-00 Dec-00 Is thio an update o~ revision of · current ClP Project? ~ Yas _~L No Project Dascrlptlon/Locaflon and the Woodrow Lane bndge w~ll be ~mproved ut~hzmg appropnate channel lining and Pecan Creek between Kerley Street culvert Improvements Project Purpose/Justification The existing channel has severe capacity problems including all crossings and is not mmntamable which restricts flow rates · chedule [ti1,000'$) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 19994)0 Totat Ex~st~ng Bonds - ;ssue Authonzed/Umssued Bonds Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 496 496 A~d ~n Construction Other Total 0 0 0 0 496 496 Constt*uc~fon Funding Costs (~l,000's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997~q8 1998-99 1999-00 Total Services 84 Land (R~ght-of-way) 2 Construction ~-10 41 Other Total 0 0 0 496 496 Operating Budget Cost~ {Jt1,0OO's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Personal Services Supphes Maintenance Services Debt Service insurance Fixed Assets Total 0 0 0 0 0 Please list expected source of operating funds Will this project result In any savings? ,,, Yes, approximate amount annually ~ No 2E73 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM P,.,roject Title KERLEY STREET CULVERT ~ -------------- ~'..';,,-'JVYear) Desl§n Bid Construct Completed - o , Begin Oct 99 Feb 00 Apr-00 -- =jtt~c[ C~t $130,000 I End Jan-00 Mar-00 Jul-00 -'~ect Description/Location Install new multiple box culverts under Kertey Street lust west of Minor Court ~floatlon Ex~stmg multiple 36 tach p~pes are inadequate to carry storm water runoff House at the corner of Kelley and Minor has flooded on several occasions 1995-96 1996-97 1997.98 1998-99 1999-00 Torn 0 Bonds - ~ssue 0 Authonzed/Un~ssued Bonds 130 130 Unauthonzed/Un~ssued Bonds 0 A~d m Construction 0 Other 130 130 ~ Total 0 0 0 0 ~uc~°n ~F,_u~I?,rig< 199~-96 1995.97 1997-9~ 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs (~,000'~) ~ 22 22 Services 2 2 Land (R;ght-of-way) ~ 06 106 Constructton 0 Other 130 130 r Total 0 0 0 0 Budget 1998 99 1999-00 To'cai Costs (~1~OOCl's) 1995.96 1996-97 1997-98 0 Personal Serv;ces 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 FixedAsset~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Total 0 0 0 0 0 0  operatlng funds __ v... a..,ox,mate amoun, annual,¥ __ ______________ AAAO3OTB 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title OPTICOM SYSTEM ProJec~ ~>,~,~,,:,,,, 0010-134 fMolYf;Jrl/YearJ\.~:~ [ltd Requesflng~Dept. Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Jan-O0 Mar-O0 Estimated Co.to $50,000 End Dec-99 Feb-00 May-O0 Is this an update o~ revision of a current ClP Project? Yes X No Project Description/Location Equip up to 10 s~gnahzed intersections w~th an opt~com system Project Purpose/Justification Aliowc emergency vehicles to control traffic s~gnals by remote control Reduce response t~mes and provides safety to other motorists Const~ctton FunCflng Schedule (;t1,000'$) 1995-96 1996 97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Ex~st~ng Bonds ~ssue 0 Authonzed/Umssued Bonds 0 Unauthonzed/Unlssued Bonds 50 50 Aid ~n Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 O 0 50 50 Costs (;tl,000's) 1998-96 1996-97 1997~98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Services 5 5 Land (R~ght-of-way) 0 Construction ~ 45 45 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 50 50 Operatln~ Badger Costs (;1,000's) 1995.96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service ~ 0 Insurance 0 F~xed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 Please list expected source of operating funds Will this project result In any savings? __ Yes, approximate amount annually X No 30B8 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title SHADY OAKS DRAINAGE ~__Comp/e Re~'est~g Dept. Englneenng & Trans Begin Dec-99 Apr-O0 Jun 00 'F.~t~alated Co~t 15939,000 End Mar-00 .L May-00 L.Oct oo isL~.s--;-~-~ updste o-'r~evlrevlalon of a current CIP Project? ~ Yes ~ No Project DescdptlonlLooctlon Construct underground drainage and hned channel from Dallas Dnve to Duncan Street w~th p~pes to Hdl and Sm*th Streets w~th mtets Project PurposelJustlflcstlon Reduce drainage problems and enhance Willow Springs drmnage prolect completed m 1991 and Chambers Street Drainage constructed m 1995 Will also reduce development costs of property between I 35E and Dallas Dnve Consl/uct[on Fundln~ 1999-00 Total .~,_L~.uie (~l, 000?)r,, 1995~96 1996-97 1997-98 199B-99 Existing Bonds - ~esue 0 ~,uthonzed/Un~ssued Bonds 939 939 Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 0 A~d ~n Constructmn 0 Other Total 0 0 0 0 939 939 Co~tructfon FUnd~g 1999-00 Total ~'~ (~l, 000's) 1991~9l~ 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 ~ 159 159 Services 5 5 Land (R~ght of-way) 775 775 Constructmn 0 Other Total 0 0 0 0 939 939 Operating Budget ~ Total r~e~. (;t?,OOO'sj 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 0 Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Serwces 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets ~ ' ctal ---- o WIR this pr~ect result In any savings? ~ Yes, eppri~lmate amount annually. 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title WELCH AT HIGHLAND RIGHT-TURN LANE Requesting Dept Engmeenng & Trans Begin Oct-99 Jan-O0 Mar-O0 Estimated Cost $23,000 End Dec-99 Feb-O0 May-00 Is this an update or revision of · current CIP Project? __ Ye~ X No J Project DescHptlonlLocaflon Construct a right turn lane on southbound Welch onto H~ghland Street UNT has committed to dedicate necessary right-of-way Project Pu~poselJustlflcatlon H~ghland Street has h~gh bus use due to UNT drop-off Will help get busses off of Welch Street more easily and ~mprove traffic flow Consb'~t/on Funding Schedule (~1,000'$) 1995.96 1996.97 1997.98 1998-99 1999~0 T~ ~st~ng Bonds - ~ssue 0 Authonzed/Un~ssued Bonds 0 Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 23 23 A~d ~n Construction 0 Other 0 TotN 0 0 0 0 23 23 ~on Fu~ng ~s (~?,O00's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997.98 1998-99 1999~0 Torn Sew~ces 3 3 Land (R;ght-of-way) 0 Construction ,20 20 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 23 23 O~atlng ~et ~st~ (~l,000'sJ 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999~0 Personal Se~ces 0 Supplies 0 Mamntenance 0 Seduces 0 In,ur*nco 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM prbject Title ROSELAWN PAVING ANO DRAINAGE {BERNARD TO EMETERY)  01/00 ~ o3/ou I 06~00 I 08~00 ~e ~ re~l.l~ of a cu~t CIP Pr~? ~ y~ ~ No Reconstruct Roselawn Drive from Bernard Street to cemetery entrances as a 24 foot estate section road Would include proper croSs drainage and driveway culverts I~'o~ect Purpose/Justifloatlon Ex~stmg road ~s very narrow and the pavement ~s ~n poor condition Prowdes main access to Roselawn Cemetery Th~s prolect is tn response to ctuzen request ~ Fm~lr~~ ~ 1998-99 1999.00 Total $ct~le (#1,000'$) 1996.96~~ 1996-97 1997-98 ~ ExistJng Bonds - ~ssue, ,. 0 AuthonzedlUn~ssued ' Bonds 664 Unauthonzed/Un~ssued Bonds 0 A~d in Construction 0 Total 0 0 0 0 664 664 Costs (;}%,O00's) ! 99E,96~~ 1996-97 1997-98 199B-99 1999-00 Total ~ -------"-- ~ ~ ~ 112 112 Services ' 20 20 Land (R{ght-of-way) $32 532 ~ Total 0 0 0 0 664 664 - ~dget 1998 99 1999-00 Total Cests ftl, OOO's/ ~ 1996-96 1996-97 1987.98 0 Personal Services 0 Su~hes 0 Mmntenance 0 Services 0 Debt Sew~ce 0 Insurance 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ _ --- g funds ----- ~y savings7 Yes, appm)amate amount annually 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title WEST WINDSOR DRIVE PAVING (OPTION 2) ProJe~-'t ~,,, 0010-8S ..... fMeet&~w] ~ vDe~l~ Bid Co~t ~ ~, R~B O~t, Engineering & Trans Begin Oct-99 Mar~O May 00 ~ C~t ~439,000 ~d Feb.0 Apr-00 Sop 00 Is thls ~ u~cte ~ revision of a current ClP Proje~? ~ Yes X No Pr~e~ D~ptlonlLoc~on ~pand ~st~ng W~ndsor to 4 lanes from Bonnie Brae to the recreation center and w~den the 2-lane section from there to Hmkl Project PurpoaalJ ustlflcctlon Provide better and safer access to North Lakes Park and the surrounding neighborhoods Co~.s~*uctlon Fundin~ Schedule (;t1,000~$) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 TOtM Existing Bonds * issue 0 Authonzed/Umssued Bonds 0 Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 439 439 A~d m Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 439 439 Conatruct~o~? Fu~g Co~t~ (~1.000'$) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Services 74 74 Land (R~ght-of-way) 0 Construction ~65 365 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 439 439 Operat/r~ Budget C05t3 (.~I, 000'~) 1995-96 1996 97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Personal Services 0 Supplies 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Service~ 0 Insurance 0 Fixed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 Please list expected source of operating funds Will this project result in any savings? Yes, approximate amount annually ~( No ZEOE 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ProjeCt Title RANCH ESTATES DRAINAGE '~ [~* · ~ ' Begin Nov 99 Apr-00 Jun-00 ; '¥"%.~:'~ ~ * ' ' J. Mar-00 May-O0 L.Dec oo b_. ,5 7,ooo ~ update ~-~evlsinn of a curt'eot C~rojact? ~ Yes ~ No ~"~'~ D *$ crlptlorl/L O( ~--~'-'~ IJnad channel from Hampton Drwe to Hwy 3S0 w~th new cuiverts under Hwy ~80 and grass lined channel south of Hwy $5,000 for processing a Letter of Map rews;on d~rough FEMA Project puq3osa/Jusflflcatlon Will solve a Iocahzed flooding problem end remove several homes from t~e floodptsm There are several i~stsncss of wa~e; entenng homes ConstrUct~n F~n~, Teta $cMffuM~[;tl,000~$)~ ~< ~ 1995-~96~ 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999,00 Ex~stmg Bonds - issue 0 ~,uthorlzed/Umssued Bonds 517 517 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 0 A~d ~n Construction 0 Other Total 0 0 0 0 517 517 Services 15 15 Land (R~ght-of-way) 409 409 Construction 5 5 Other Total 0 0 0 0 517 517 Operating Judger 1998-99 1999~00 Total ~*~+~(~1,000,'$J 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 Personal Serv;ces 0 Supphes 0 Maintenance 0 Services 0 Debt Serv~se 0 insurance 0 Fixed Assets Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 [ Will this ixoject r~ult in any ~avings? ~ Yes, approximate amount annually AAAO2E71 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Proje"ct~l~ltle~,' NORTH LAKES PARK EXPANSION Requee~ DeptJ~ ~ Parks & Recreatmn Begin 09~98 02~99 04~99 Estimated:Coat $1,500,000 End 02/99 04/99 01/00 01/00 Is this an update m' revision of a current CIP Project? Yes ~ No I Project Desc~lptJon/Locctlon Th~s proJeot wdl allow for the expansmn of approx:matel¥ 20 acres at North Lakes Park Th:s expanston w~ll ~nclude addmonal soccer fields, parking, restrooms, and support fac:ht~es Project Purpose/Justification Th~s prolect w~ll allow the Parks and Recreation Department to keep up w~th the growth ~n youth athletics ConsU'uc~n Fur, dl~ $cbadule~f;tl,00~*$) 1995.96 1996-97 1997~8 1998.99 ~1999-2000 ~st~ng Bonds - ~ssue 0 Authonzed~mssued Bonds 0 Unauthonzed~n~ssued Bonds 1,000 1,000 Aid m Constructron 500 500 Other 0 Torn 0 0 0 0 1,500 1,500 Co~n F~ ~ : Co~s (tl,000'~) 199~96 1996-97 1997~8 ~998-99 1999-~00 TO~ Saw,cas 150 150 Land (R~ght~f-way) 0 Construction 1 ,~50 1,350 Other 0 TCt~ 0 0 0 0 1,500 1,500 O~raE~ Costs MI,0OO's) 2000~1 1996-97 1997~8 1998.99 1999-2000 To~ Personal Saw,cas 44 44 Supphes 6 6 Maintenance 26 26 Sew~ces 30 30 Debt Se~ce 0 Insurance 0 F~xed Assets 0 Torn 106 0 0 0 0 106 Please Ust expe~ source of operating funds C~ty of Denton General Fund Operating Budget ~11 this proje~ result In ~y savings? ~ Yes, approximate amount annually X No 2EOA 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM e Facd~W Project Title Construct Fuel Stora project # 0019-004 !~_.~t__ ~Yw) Design W ~ ~m~t~ R~g D~t. A~rpo~ ~ 1999 1999 1999 1999 ~t~ C~t ~488 1999 1999 1999 1999 ~s ~ u~e M re~l~ of a ~t ClP ~ ~ y~ ~ No Rev~smn ~ Descdpfl~lL~ Per Master ~an Con~ruct Fuel Storage Fac~hW ~t Pur~selJue~ To meet E P A requtrements by removing undergro~ ~orage tanks 1 a9 2000 ~..__._ 1996-97 199~8 1998-99 ~lst~nO Bonds - ~ssue 0 ~uthorlzed~n~ssued Bonds 0 Unauthorized/Unissued Bonds 0 A~d in Construction 488 Ot~r 488 488 TotM ~ F~ 1999-20~ To~ ~ (~1,000'~i I~E 199~97 1997-98 1998-99 Se~tces ~ (Right~f way) Construction Other TotM ~* f~1,000'~) 1995-9~ 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-20~; To~ Perso~l Sewlces Supplies Seduces Debt Sew~ce F~xed Assets 488 TotM ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ my s~? ~ y~ ~-ox~ amount annually X,_ No 1996-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Title MASCH BRANCH ROAD PHASE I Task $~liedufe ~ Projeet~' 0010 73 (Month/Year) ~ ,J~, Bid ~ / Completed Requesl~ng Dept Engmeenng &Trans Begin 0ct-99 Mar-00 May-00 Estimated Co~t $847,000 End Feb-O0 Apr 00 Mar-01 Is this an update or revision of a current CIP Project? Yes ~ No ] Project Description/Location =rov~de 27 foot road between Hwy 380 and J~m Christal Road including drmnage and curb and gutter - ~roject Purpose/Justification =rowde ~mproved access to 380 from industrial area around the A~rport Co~n Funding Schedule (;tl,000'S) 1999-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999,00 Total Ex~st~ng Bonds - ~ssue 0 Authorized/Unissued Bonds 0 Unauthonzed/Umssued Bonds 847 847 A~d in Construction 0 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 847 847 ConstrucEon Funding Costs (,~1,000's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 TotaJ Serwces 75 75 Land (R~ght-of-way) 64 64 Construct;on 708 708 Other 0 Total 0 0 0 0 847 847 Operating Budget Costs (;l,000's) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999~)0 Total Personal Serwces 0 Supphes 0 Mmntenance 0 Services ~ 0 Debt Service 0 Insurance 0 F~xed Assets 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 Please list expected source of operating funds Will this project result In any savings? Yes, approx;mate amount annually. X No 30A9 0000000~ 0 08-31-95 06 31AM FROM FREESE & NICHOLS TO 915124639893///95195 P001/003 4055 Intem~onal Plaza, Suite 200, FozL Worth, Texas 76109-4895 817/735-7300 FAX 817/7357491 Fnis $=- N~c FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET ~,~l~t,.~u.TO: GORDON THORN , FAX NO.: (~12~ 483-g893 Co,',. M~,-- DATE: Auq ust 3 t. t 99~ D~ ~, , FROM: Mike D~pllle$ ~e~cH ~"~S To~ numar of p~, including ~sm;~ s~t' ~.. n~ S~e ' P~E EX~D~ TO ~D~SSEE F~ ~tc~on ~looa ~ CO~N~: ~wes ~ C~ ~cfl ~e~ ~: CI~ OF DKNTON ~OD G~NT APPLICA~ON ~, De~ Attached ~ a ~py of the ~dment to ~e flood piing ~t Plmb~ ~s~ apphcauon for ~e C1W of Denton The o~d ~ll be sent to you m · e m~ ~ ~ould ~ve ~ly ne~ ~p blA~ Desi~ Please c~ me ~er~ ~s ~ng else that Is ne~ ~ for your ~aau~ help U~es Sold W~ W ~er Reso~ Watez ~s~a Syste~ Wa~ ~tewat~ ~ ~e~ I ~ ~ere ~s ~ proble~ r~o~g ~y of ~ese pages, ple~e c~ ~ o~ office ~ 817~35-7291 08-31-95 06 31AM FROMFREESE &NICHOLS TO 915124639893///95195 P002/003 APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GI~ANT FOR THE C~PER C~K REGION~ DETE~ION P0~ PEC~ C~K ~OION~ C~ ~KO~ S~Y Au~st 30, 1995 ['he follower g ttem~ ~hould be noted regarding ~he apphcatlon for flood protecuon planning grant for he City of', )enton, Tex~ 'a_~e 7. ltet 2! The combined current un~nployment rate for the planning area Cooth Cooper and Pecan creek water~eds) ~s $ 22% )a~e 7. Itet 22 The combined current per-capita income tn the plannml~ area (both Cooper and Pecan eruk xvatersheds) ~s $1:2,317 ~.~J3_-3. ~ ~n D The work described m thts item does not include preparaUon of a TNKCC perrmt Rather, the intent ts to review the current TNACC regulations assomated with detention facthues and advtse the City of Denton on the reqmrements to obtmn a penmt and any posstOle problem areas ~ Thc work dcsc~tbcd in flus item should bc madc to read "Azs~st the Ctty w~th preparaUon of the nccessa~' documentauon to be submitted to the TNRCC for approval of the regional detem~nn fa~'lw/d~gn" The intent is to compile the necessary data from the mformat~on generated dunng thc study ~a_ae B-4. I~em F The intent of the work descn~bed m th~s ~tem is to compile the floodplain ~ m.+'ormatton generated dunng the study m a manner that ts acceptable to FEMA so that it can be included m a subnuttel to FI~MA for a map revlzion The work described tn th~s ~tcm does not include preperauon of · Corps of Engineers 404 permtt Rather, the intent ts to review the current Corps of Engineers regul&tmns associated w~th 404 perrmts and advtse the C~ty of Denton on the requtrements to obtain e pernut and any possible problem areas ~ ~ The mten~ of thc work described m ~ ttem is to compde the floodplain informauon generated dunng the study tn · m~lncr that ~s acceptable to FEMA so that it can be included tn a subrmttal to FEMA for a map rewston Items II C end II D were combined into one ~tem any. tied "Perform Cosr/l]enefk 08-31-95 06 31AM FROMFREESE & NICHOLS TO 915124639893///95195 P003/003 TASK 1 - COOPER CREEK REGIONAl. DETENTION STUDY C:ITY 011 DENTON TEXAS I I TOTAL PROJECT t74,88e A C E N T U R Y 0 F S E R V I C E I~REBBB NI~HOI.~ Mr Gordon Reg~on~ PI~g ~d R~h T~ Wa~r ~velopment ~d P.O. ~x 13231 17~ N. Congas Aven~ Ausan, Tex~ 78711-3231 Re: City of Denton Fund Grant Application Dear Mr Thorn: Enclosed is a copy of the amendment to the City of Denton's grant appheat~on for Texas Water Development Board flood protectaon planmng funding The changes we discussed m our prewous telephone conversation have been made If there is any addmonal mformaUon needed for your cons~derataon, please feel free to call Very truly yours, FREESE' AND NICHOLS, INC. Michael J Delhes, P E Enclosure xc File (DTN95195-2 10) DTNg5195r1' ~LI~T~THORN 001] Freese and Nichols, Inc Engineers Enwronmental Scientists Architects 4055 Internahonal Plaza Suite 200 Fort Worth Texas 76109 4895 817 735-7300 Metro 8t7-429 1900 Fax 817-735 7491 APPLICATION FOR FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING GRANT FOR THE COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION POND PECAN CREEK REGIONAL CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY August 30, 1995 The following items should be noted regarding the apphcation for flood protection planning grant for the City of Denton, Texas PaKe 7. Item 21 The combined current unemployment rate for the plannmS area (both Cooper and Pecan creek watersheds) is $ 22% Page 7. Item 22 The combined current per-capita income m the planmng area (both Cooper and Pecan creek watersheds) is $12,317 Page B-3. Item D The work descnbed m tins item does not include preparauon of a TNRCC permit Rather, the intent is to rewew the current TNRCC regulauons associated w~th detenuon faaht~es and advise the City of Denton on the reqmrements to obtmn a penmt and any possible problem areas Pale B-4, Item E The work described m tbs ~tem should be made to read "Assist the Ctty w~th preparaUon of the necessary documentation to be subnutted to the TNRCC for approval of the regional detenuon faahty design" The intent is to compile the necessary data ~om the information generated during the study Page B-4. Item F The intent of the work described m tlus item is to compile the floodplain mformataon generated during the study m a manner that is acceptable to FEMA so that ~t can be included in a subn~ttal to FEMA for a map revision Page B-6, Item D The work described m tbs ~tem does not include preparation of a Corps of Engineers 404 penmt Rather, the intent is to review the current Corps of Engineers regulations associated w~th 404 pernnts and adwse the City of Denton on the requirements to obtmn a penmt and any possible problem areas Page B-6. Item E The intent of the work descnbed m tlas item is to compile the floodplain reformation generated dunng the study in a manner that is acceptable to FEMA so that it can be included m a subnuttal to FEMA for a map rewsion Exhb~t C Items II C and II D were combined into one item entitled *'Perform Cost/Benefit Analysis" EXHIBIT C TASK I - COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION STUDY CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS TOTAL PROJECT $ 74,886