1996-072J \wpdocs\ord\dralnage ord
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
WITH FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
RELATING TO THE PREPARATION OF THE COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION
STUDY AND THE PECAN CREEK TRIBUTARY PEC-4 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT
STUDY; AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS
SECTION I. That the City Manager is authorized to execute an
agreement between the City of Denton and Freese and Nichols, Inc.
for professional engineering services relating to the preparation
of the Cooper Creek Regional Detention Study and the Pecan Creek
Tributary PEC-4 Channel Improvement Study as required in the City
application to the Texas Water Development Board for funding
assistance, under the terms and conditions contained in said
agreement, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof
SECTION II That the City Council hereby authorizes the
expenditure of funds in the manner and amount as specified in the
agreement.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage and approval
PASSED AND APPROVED this the /~day of ~~ , 1996.
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM'
HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY
A C E N T U R Y O F S E R V I C E
Mr Jerry Clark, P E
Director of Engineering/Transportation
City of Denton
215 E McKanney Street
Denton, Texas 76201
Re: Cooper Creek/Pecan Creek Regional
Drainage Improvement Study
Dear Jerry
We are pleased to submit th~s proposal for prowdlng engineering sermces to the C~ty of Denton
for the Cooper Creek and Pecan Creek Tr~bntary PEC-4 Regional Drainage Improvement Study
We understand that the study ~s needed to evaluate possible alternatives for erosion and flood
protection along Cooper Creek and Trtbutary PEC-4 We will use our prewous work along
Tributary PEC-4, particularly near Robertson Street and Bell Avenue, m the evaluation of
possible alternatwes for Tributary PEC-4
SCOPE OF SERVICES.
ENGINEER proposes to promde our serwces as outhned tn your apphcat~on to the Texas Water
Development Board for funding assistance and described m the following detailed Scope of
Servtces
TASK 1: COOPER CREEK REGIONAL DETENTION STUDY
I RECONNAISSANCE & DATA COLLECTION
A A coordination meeting wdl be held wtth OWNER for the purpose of rewew~ng
available data for use dunng the study, rewewlng the scope of the work to be done
and the object~ves of the study, and to remew the project personnel and their
respons~blht~es for both OWNER and ENGINEER
B Perform one s~te ws~t to the Cooper Creek watershed to evaluate possible sites for
regional detentmn ponds The site v~s~t will include the remew of not more than
sm possible s~tes for acceptability as regional detention facilities, including the
following
Freese and N~chols Inc Engineers Enwronmental Scientists Architects
4055 International Plaza Suite 200 Fort Worth Texas 76109 4895
817-735 7300 Metre 817-429 1900 Fax 817 735 7491
Mr Jerry Clark, P E
February 26, 1996
Page 2
1 The area north of Cooper Creek, east of Old North Road, west of Loop
288, and south of Windsor Street
2 The area north of Kings Row, east of Yorkshire, and southwest of Loop
288
3 The area north of Hercules, east of F M 2164, south of Loop 288, and
west of Redstone
4 The area north of Evers Parkway, west of F M 2164, and south of Loop
288
5 Two other additional sites may be selected for evaluation in the study if
condmons observed dunng the s~te wsa suggest a favorable locaUon
C Coordinate w~th the Federal Emergency Management Agency to obtam the latest
hydrologm (HEC-1) and hydraulic (HEC-2) computer models for the Cooper Creek
watershed
D Coordinate w~th local utility compames to determine the presence of existing utility
lines w~thm the posstble regional detention facility site hsted in Item B above
E Coordinate w~th OWNER's staff to obtam available base mapping The base
map(s) will be prepared by OWNER from mformat~on currently available on ~ts
geographic mformat~on system (GIS)
F Obtain field survey data necessary for prehmlnary s~z~ng of the proposed detenuon
facIhties at each location
G Obtain soft boring data at each proposed site One boring will be made at each
location selected as a possible detention site
II. CONCEPTUAL EVALUATION
A Perform hydrologm analys~s on the s~tes idennfled ~n Item I B above, ~ncluding
the following
1 Computation of contributing drainage area to the s~tes being evaluated using
topographm reformation available from OWNER's GIS data base If
sufficient topographic mformaUon is not available through OWNER's GIS
Mr Jerry Clark, P E
February 26, 1996
Page 3
data base, the drainage area will be delineated using U S G S quadrangle
maps of the watershed area
2 Modify the existing HEC-1 computer model from FEMA to include design
computation points at the potential regional detention facility sites If an
existing HEC-1 computer model is not available from FEMA, a new model
will be created
3 Determination of the 5-, 10-, 25-, 50- and 100-year peak discharges for
existing and ultimate watershed conditions with the detention faclhtles in
place at each potential regional detention facility site The typical SCS
primary spillway will be used to estimate peak discharges with the proposed
detention facihtles in place
4 Determine the maximum storage available at each of the regional detention
facthty sites Future development adjacent to each site will be considered
in the determmaUon of the detention pond layout phase m addition to the
existing development surrounding each s~te In addition, dual purpose uses
for the detention facilities, such as soccer fields, will be considered when
evaluating the proposed detention ponds
5 Evaluate the cumulative effect of the regional detention faclhtles on the
peak discharges along Cooper Creek for the portion of the creek upstream
of Loop 288 Prlormze the regional detention pond construction by
cost/benefit analysis No more than twelve construction sequence scenarios
will be evaluated to determine the effect of construction sequencing on the
Cooper Creek peak discharges
B Perform hydrauhc analysis of impact of detention facilmes on Cooper Creek
floodplain
1 Modify existing HEC-2 hydraulic stream model of Cooper Creek to include
the peak discharges computed in Item II A above
2 Compute expected floodplain profiles corresponding to 10-, 50- 100- and
500-year frequenmes for exisnng and ultimate watershed development with
the proposed detention facilities in place
3 Dehneate the 100-year floodplains on available topographic maps for
existing conditions and ultimate development conditions with the proposed
detention facihtles in place
Mr Jerry Clark, P E
February 26, 1996
Page 4
4 Prepare summary table of results of hydrauhc analysis
C Prepare an estmaate of probable construction costs associated with the proposed
regional detention system
D Review the TNRCC regulations associated with detention faclhty construction and
outline steps needed to obtain TNRCC approval of the proposed regional detention
system Potentml problem areas, if any, will be also identified No environmental
reviews of the proposed detention facihty sites will be performed If such reviews
are required and requested by OWNER, such reviews shall be considered
additional services and ENGINEER shall be entitles to compensation based on
Attachment B, Schedule of Charges
E Summarize the results of the conceptual evaluaUon
I Prepare a report summarizing the findings of the conceptual evaluation
The following ~tems shall be included ~n the conceptual report
a Comparison of d~scharges for existing development, ultimate
watershed development, and ultimate watershed development with
the proposed regional detemIon system In place
b Map showing the entire watershed w~th the locations of the
proposed regional detention facilities and their respective
contributing drainage areas, the horizontal location of the existing
utilities that could pose a potential conflict with the proposed
detention facilities, and the 100-year floodplain limits for existing
conditions and ultimate watershed conditions w~th the detention
facilities m place
c The anticipated construction costs of the regional detention facihtles
on a per-site bas~s as well as for the entire regional detention
system Provide a recommendation concerning the sequencing of
construetmg the regional detention faclhties in accordance with Item
II A above
d Provide a recommendation for alternative dry weather uses for the
regional detention faclhtles, as well as the possibility of retaining
water ~n the ponds for aesthetic purposes, such as in a park
Mr Jerry Clark, P E
February 26, 1996
Page 5
2 Attend a meeting with OWNER to d~scuss the results of the conceptual
evaluation and the ENGINEER's recommendations for proceeding with the
project
III FEMA SUBMITTAL
Prepare the necessary mformat~on needed for a submtttal to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency to obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) for the project areas Work
to be performed m th~s task includes preparation of the necessary paperwork reqmred by FEMA
for a CLOMR request submittal, preparation of the technical data required wtth the CLOMR
submittal, and responding to questions/comments rinsed by FEMA during their review process
TASK 2: PECAN CREEK TRIB. PEC-4 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT STUDY
I. RECONNAISSANCE & DATA COLLECTION
A Attend one coordination meeting w~th OWNER for the purpose of remewmg
avadable data for use during the study, reviewing the scope of the work to be done
and the objectives of the study, and to review the project personnel and their
responsibilities for both OWNER and ENGINEER
B Perform one ms~t to the Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4 watershed to observe the
ex~st~ng condmons of the channel The s~te v~slt will tnclude the preparation of a
photographic record of the conditions that presently ex~st along the channel, w~th
parttcular attention focused on areas where potential design problems area
antmlpated
C Coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to obtain the latest
hydrologic (HEC1) and hydrauhc (HEC-2) computer models for Pecan Creek
Tributary PEC-4
D Obtain field survey data, including the locauon and finished floor elevation of
structures adjacent to the creek, channel cross sections, and bridge/culvert data for
the entire length of the stream
E Coordinate w~th local utthty compames to determine the presence of ex~snng utility
lines along Tributary PEC-4
H. PRELIMINARY DESIGN
A Perform hydrauhc analysis of ~mpact of the proposed channel improvements to
Pecan Creek Tributary PEC-4
Mr Jerry Clark, P E
February 26, 1996
Page 6
1 Evaluate not more than three channel improvement scenarios to determine
the type and extent of channel improvements needed to eliminate the
diversion of stormwater from the PEC-4 watershed to the Pecan Creek
watershed The ~ntent of the channel improvement evaluation will be to
maintain the 100-year floodplain wtthln the channel banks as required by
the City of Denton drainage criteria
2 Evaluate the need for increasing bridge/culvert sizes for the crossings along
Tributary PEC-4
3 Delineate on available topographic maps the 100-year floodplains for
ex~stlng conditions and conditions with the proposed channel ~mprovements
in place
4 Prepare summary table of results of hydraulic analysis
C Prepare an estimate of probable construction costs associated with the proposed
channel improvement scenarios evaluated in the study A cost/benefit analysis will
be made of each channel improvement scenario developed
D Rewew the Corps of Engineers regulations associated with 404 Permits and outline
steps needed to obtain 404 Permat approval of the proposed channel amprovements
Potentml problem areas, If any, will be also identified
E Prepare the necessary information required for a submittal to the Federal
Emergency Management Agency for a Condmonal Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR) reflecting the proposed planning project
F Sununanze the results of the preliminary design
1 Prepare a report summarizing the findings of the preliminary design The
following items shall be included in the design report
a Tabular comparison of floodplain elevations for existing channel
conditions and conditions with the proposed channel improvements
in place
b Map showing the entire watershed with the locations of the
proposed channel improvements, the location and type of
bridge/culvert improvements needed, the horizontal location of the
existing utfl~ues that could pose a potentml conflict with the channel
improvements, and the lO0-year floodplain hm~ts for existing
condmons and conditions with the channel improvements in place
Mr Jerry Clark, P E
February 26, 1996
Page 7
c Cross sections of the channel improvements in sufficient detail to
illustrate the type of ~mprovements proposed
d An estimate of the probable construction costs and total project costs
of the channel ~mprovements
2 Attend one meeting w~th OWNER to d~scuss the results of the preliminary
design and ENGINEER's recommendations for proceeding with the project
COMPENSATION:
ENGINEER proposes to perform the serwces descrtbed m the above Scope of Services for the
lump sum of $97,980 (NINETY SEVEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY
DOLLARS) If work outside or beyond the above scope ~s required and approved by OWNER,
those additional services shall be compensated on the bas~s of Attachment B, SCHEDULE OF
CHARGES, dated September 30, 1995 Payment for the services shall be due and payable upon
submission of a statement for services Statements for services shall not be submitted more
frequently than monthly
INDEMNIFICATION:
Freese and N~chols, Inc (ENGINEER) shall lndemmfy and save harmless the CITY OF
DENTON (OWNER) and ~ts officers, agents and employees from the laabfllty of the OWNER
on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person or persons, or
property, mcludmg court costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred by the OWNER,
proximately caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the ENGINEER or ~ts officers, agents,
or employees m the execution, operation, or performance of this Agreement
OWNER RESPONSIBILITIES:
OWNER shall assist ENGINEER by placing at ENGINEER's disposal all available information
pertinent to the Project, including previous report and any other such data relative to the Project,
~ncludlng
1 Available topographic data of the proposed project sites
2 The location of C~ty-owned utflmes (water and sewer) and privately owned ut~ht~es
(gas, telephone, etc ) xf available
3 Cop~es of studies/reports of prewous analyses associated with the proposed project
sites that were not prewously prepared by Freese and N~chols, ~f any
ENGINEER shall have no habfl~ty for defects m the WORK attributable to ENGINEER's
reliance upon or use of data, design criteria, drawings, specifications or other ~nformat~on
Mr Jerry Clark, P E
February 26, 1996
Page 8
furnished by OWNER which was not previously prepared by Freese and Nichols, and OWNER
agrees to mdemmfy and hold ENGINEER harmless from any and all claims and judgements, and
all losses, costs and expenses arising therefrom ENGINEER shall dasclose to OWNER, prior
to use thereof, defects or omlssaollS m the data, design criteria, drawings, speclflCauons or other
information furmshed by OWNER to ENGINEER that ENGINEER may reasonably discover in
~ts review and inspection thereof
OWNER shall review material submitted for comment in a timely manner so as not to delay the
services of ENGINEER
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
The Scope of Services shall be performed pursuant to Attachment A, STANDARD TERMS
AND CONDITIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, dated April 15, 1991, which is
incorporated ~nto and made part of this proposal
We apprecmte th~s opportunity to provide you with our services and we look forward to
continuing our relationship w~th the City of Denton If additional ~nformat~on or clarification
is needed, please do not hesitate to contact us If you are in agreement with the services
described above and w~sh for us to proceed with this assignment, please sign below and return
one copy of the agreement for our fries
Very truly yours,
FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. CITY OF DENTON
Michael J Delhes, P E Title /~/~?~f / ' ':~'
Project Manager
Date .~[ lq I q ~,
,,
Pnncipal
Attachments
xc M~ke N~chols
Tern W~tcher
{OFF95450}T XDT44\AOREEMT LTR
~I ~ , .,~ --~ 4-15-91
Lr ~ STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS F&N
" _' ~' FQR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DEFINI' 7IONS: The,term OWNER as used~berein refers to Cl t~ of' Denton
term EN GINHER as used hereto refers to F~eese,and Nichols, Inc its employees and agen~ts also its
subcont~ tctors and their employees and agents ~The AGREEMENT consists of these Standard Terms and
Condittc as~,~attachments Hereto ~he proposaliletter by ENGINEER terms/instructions typ, ~ on the face
of the P~ rchase Order or other authorization by,OWNER As used herein, WORK refers to the
professk nal services performed ~by ENGINEER pursuant to tho AGREEMENT
CHANG ~. 'OWNER, wRhout~invahdating'the '~GREEMENT may order changes within the general
scope of the' WOR~K required by theiAGREEMENT by altering adding to and/or deducting from the
WORK :o be performed If any~change under th~s clause causes an increase or decrease in the
ENGIN] i~R'S cost of, or the II,me required fgr, the performance of any part or'the WORK~ under the
AGREE MENT, an~ equitable aflJustment will.lbetmede,by mutual agreement and the AGREEMENT
modlfie~ in writing ~ccoMingly~ ~' ' ~ '
TERMR ATION ,The obligation to provlda~services under this AGREEMENT may be terminated by
either ~ upon ten days written not,ce In the event of termmatmn ENGINEER will be prod for all
services ~ ~ ~red ~nd reimbursable expenses recurred to the date of termination and, m addition, all
expenses dtrectly~attflbutable to'termination
o event shall the ENGINEER ~ts subcontractors ,e'hable in
strict llabllity,,warraoty, or otherwise for any specml, redirect, incidental or c ~nsequentlal
such as loss of product~ loss of use of the eqolpment~or system, loss of anticipate profits or
reve~ue mcr'~sed expense ~f operation or other ~mpment or systems
INFOI~ [ATION ~URN]~8IiED BY OWN~R-'~ OWNER will assist ENGINEER ~by placing
ENGIN] ~ER'8 disposal all available mgormatlon~pertlnent to the Project including previouS reports and
any oth¢ data relative to das~gn'or constrecUon o~ the Project ENGINEER shall have no hab~ltty for
defects i the WO~RK attributable to ENGINEER S rehance upon or use of data, design criteria,
drawingl specifications or other information,furnished by OWNER and OWNER agrees,t indemnify and
hold EN ~INEER harmless from any and all clmms~ and judgments, and all losses, costs and expenses
arising tl ~erefrom ~ENOINEERi~hall disc!o,s~ to'OWNER, prior to use thereo~iIdefects orlomisslons in
the data, d~gn criteria,~ drawings, specufications or other i~formauon furmshed by OWNE~ to
ENGIN] iER that ENGINEER i~ay reusonab!y discover ~n Its rewew and inspection' thereof
INSUI~ ~CE, ENGINEER(shall prowde to OWNER certificates of insurance which shall contain the
followir minimum, coverages (All limits m thousands)
Comme iai General Liability ! ~ ~
, ' I Workers' Compensation
~l,~Aggregate~ i ~q.~ $2,000 Each Accident $ 500
Gene, l~ ~ ~ ~
Autor~ biie*Llability~(Any Au~te~)'' Professional Liability $3,000 Annual Aggregate
- SUBCONTRACTS~ If, for any reason, at any~ time during,the progress of the WORK, OWNER '
· determines that any subcontractor for the ENGINEER is incompetent or undesirablet OWNER~will noti
the ENGINEER accordingly and the ENGINEER shall take~lmmedlate steps for cancellation of such
subcontract. Subletting by subcontractors shall~be subject~lo the same regulations Nothing' ~
contain ~ecl in the AGREEMENT shall creat?lany contractual relation, beiween any sul~col~rgctor and
OWNERSItlP OF DOCUMENTS~ All drawings,~ reports, data and other ~rolect info matio~ develoned in
the execution of the WORK shall be,thc property of the ~OWNBR~-upon payment of E~NOINEER'S fces~
f for services ~ ENGINEER ~ay r, etain copi~ for,recc~rd purposes ~ ENGINEER repre~en~tsttthat it hasta~
policy and procedure designed to protect any~proprtetary information developed durin~ the WORK
including n, qtices to its employees to preven~t unautho~rize~!~publication and disclosure ~Q ,WNER agrees to
indemnify ]ENGINEER from all erxpenses, 10ss, and damages caused by the use of the documents for other
projects without the concurrence of ENGINEER ~ ', ~ ~ ~ - ~ , ~ ~
~POL~,UTANTS AND HAZARDOUS WASTES. ~I,t ts undcrstood and agr~e~d that the ENGINEER has ~
neither creat~ nor contributed to the creation or-existence of any hazardous radioactive, toxic, irritant
pollutant or otherwise dangerous substance'or condition at the site if any and its comper~sation ] ~ /
hereunder is in no way commensurate with the potential risk of injury or loss that may be caused bv ~
exposures to such substances or~conditious The narties agree that in nerformin~, the~WORK reauired by
this AQREEMENT, ENGI,NEER does not,take possession or~ control of the subject site but acts as an
invitee in performing the services and is not therefore responsible for the existenCe of anyi pollutant ~
present onlor migrating from the site Further ENGINEER shall have no responsibility for any pollutant
during clean-up, transportation storage or disposal activities, ~ ~ , ~ , .~ [ i ~ ~ - ~
EST,IMATE~OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS~ ENGINI~ER will furnish an opinion of probable
construction cost of the work, but does not guarantee the accuracy of such estimates ~Ofiinions of,)
probable construction cost flnancial~evaluauons; feasiblbtV,studles, economic analvses~of alternate ~
solutions and utilitarian considerations of operations and maintenance costs prepared by ENGINEER
hereunder will be made on the basis of ENGINEER'S experlepce and qualifications and renresent
ENGIN~EER'S Judgement ~an exper~enced~and~,qualified design professional It i~ r ~ecognized, however,
that ENGINEER does not have control over the~cost o~ labor/material, eouivment or se~ces furmshed
by others or over market conditions or contractdrs' methods of determining their nrices, ~ ] ~ '~ , ~,
GENERAL~REP~RESENTATIONDURINOICONSTRUCTION: ~If'r~ired by thc AGREEMENT, , ~ ?,
-ENQINEER will furni~sh ,G~eneral R,eprescntat~u During Construction according to t~he d~flned scope for
these services ENGINEER,will make the prescribed number of visits each month to,,the'site (as ~
distinguished from the continuqu~s services of a Resident Representative) to observe the pr~ress and the
quality of work and to determine in ~leneral if the work is DroceedlnR in accordance with ,the Contract
Documents In perfor~mmg these services, ENGINEER' will endeavor ~to protect OWNER aaainst defects
-and deficiencies in the work,of ~,o~trhctors,r ENGINEE~ ~w'll r~nort anv observ~ed' d~flcienei~s~to ~ ~,~
OWNER~, howeyer,~it is unde,~tood that ENGINEER does ~o~t ~uarante~ the,Contractor's[~e~rformance,~,
no~r is ENGINEER resDonsible for the~suv~rvision of the Contractor's operation and ~mvlo~tecs ~ ~
ENGINEER shall,not be responsible for the means, methods,.,techmques seOuences or proCedures of
construction selected by the Contractor, or~thc safety precautions and programs incident tolthe work of
tl~e Contractor ENGINEER shall not be respo~sibla for th'e a~ts or om~sious of anv',ners'b~l fexce~t h~s
~own employees or agent) at the Project site for o!herwlse p~rforming ~tny of the work f thq Pr'sj~ct'~If'
O~WNER designates a~ person to'serve m the capacity of Resident Prelect Representative who is not
E~NGINEER or ENGINEER'S ~agent or employee, the duties responsibihties and limitations*of~authority
of such Resident Project Representative(s)will bc set forth in writmff and made a hart of thL~ ~ ~ ,
AORE,BMENT before the Construction Phase of the Project begins ~ -~ ~- ' ~[ - ~ ~ ~ ·
,R~F. SIDENT~REPRESENTATI~ON DURING CONSTRUCTIONist.If required by the AGRBEMENT, ~
ENGI~NEER will furnish resi~dent representation ~$erv~ces with duties [responsibilities a~nd qimitations of ~
~authority of Resident Re resentative as defined'm the~A reement , ~ , , ~ ' ~ ' , q
ATTACHMENT B
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
BILLABLE SALARY RATES
POSITION MIN MAX
PRINICIPAL 144 11 176 87
DEPT MANAGER 10087 16201
ASST DEPT MANAGER 79 94 92 93
PROGRAM MANAGER 75 31 94 14
SENIOR ENGINEER 95 45 119 G0
ENGINEER V 88 78 103 42
ENGINEER IV 66 87 98 27
ENGINEER Ill 62 05 82 20
ENGINEER II 55 43 65 42
ENGINEER I 42 80 53 50
SR ELECTRICALENGINEER 9700 121 24
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER IV 74 52 93 15
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER I1[ 66 10 84 33
MECHANICAL ENGINEER IV 84 06 80 06
MECHANICAL ENGINEER III 51 40 64 25
RESIDENT ENGINEER 92 86 115 82
SENIOR RESIDENT REPRESENTATIVE 70 24 83 03
FIELD REPRESENTATNE II 48 84 83 13
DESIGNER II 74 34 92 93
DESIGNER I 65 63 83 61
SENIOR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 68 82 83 78
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 49 25 61 72
TECHNICIAN II 42 42 65 38
TECHNICIAN I 37 25 47 76
DRAFTER 28 17 35 22
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TECH II 43 88 54 98
PLANNER iV 58 46 73 08
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST VI & ASST DEPT MANAGER 74 88 93 60
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST V 67 42 84 28
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST IV 62 74 78 42
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST Iii 66 76 75 22
ENVIRONMENTAL. SCIENTIST II 49 97 58 56
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST I 45 32 49 06
ARCHITECT V 90 3O 97 29
ARCHITECT IV 71 35 90 78
ARCHITECT Ill 56 91 71 14
ARCHITECT II 50 94 63 68
SENIOR GEOLOGIST 71 45 89 32
HYDROLOGIST II 52 27 54 98
HYDROGEOLOGIST 70 40 88 00
WORD PROCESSING/SECRETARIAL 38 02 43 55
ASSISTANT TO DiVISiON MANAGER 54 88 74 33
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR 52 05 65 06
INFORMATION SERVICES CLERK 29 12 40 46
CO-OP 17 75 37 78
RATES FOR INHOUSE SERVICES
Computer and CAD Cetoomp Plotter
PC CAD Stations $10 00 per hour Bond $2 00 per plot
PC Stations $8 00 per hour Vellum $4 00 per plot
VAX Computer $20 00 per hour Mylar $10 00 per plot
Print 8hop
Bluelines $0 07 per square foot
Offset end Xerox Copies $0 14 per double side copy
GBC Blndlrlg(Reg Cover) $2 00 per book
GBC Binding(Emboss Cover) $4 00 per book
Tape Binding(Rog Cover) $1 75per book
Tape Binding(Emboss Cover) $3 75 per book
Density Meter $350 00 per month
OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES
cpm A 09-30-95