1994-103E:\WPDOCS\ORD\THC.CLG
ORDINANCE NO. qj 1d 3
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT WITH THE
TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION FOR A HISTORICAL SURVEY; AUTHORIZING
THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION I. That the City council authorizes the City Manager
to execute any and all documents necessary to obtain a Certified
Local Government Grant from this Texas Historical Commission, a
copy of the Grant Agreement being attached hereto and incorporated
by reference herein.
SECTION II. That the city council authorizes the expenditure
of funds in accordance with the terms of the grant.
SECTION III. That this ordinance shall become effective immed-
iately upon its passage and approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1994.
, MA
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY: 04AAl'irl, Zda~
0 0
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
DEBRA A. DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY
BY :
54 P~ E OF ~c<
lbw : ~ ~ . v
(1411. TI NNELI.
EXH I'TIVE DIRECTOR
T E X A S H I S T O R I C A L C O M M I S S I O N
P.O. BOX 12276 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 15121467-6100
CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT
This agreement is entered into by the Texas Historical
Commission, a State Agency, hereinafter referred to as the
Commission, and the City of Denton, hereinafter referred to as
the Contractor, pursuant to a grant made to the Commission for
Fiscal Year 1994, by the U.S. Department of the Interior,
National Park Service, under the provisions of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, P.L. 89-665 (16 U.S.C. Sec.
470 et seq. This grant is made for the purpose of funding a
project or projects to be undertaken by the Contractor as a
participant in the Certified Local Government program.
The Contractor in consideration of the hereinafter monetary
sum to be paid by the Commission agrees as follows:
SEC. 1. The Contractor shall undertake and complete the
project and/or projects as set out in the Approved Project
Notification (with detailed budget) and attached Environmental
Certification (Attachment A). Products developed under this
agreement must conform to the expectations of the Commission and
the Project Proposal, as stipulated in Attachment B.
SEC. 2. It is agreed that the Contractor shall be an
independent Contractor for the purposes of this Agreement. The
Contractor shall not be considered the agent, the servant, or the
employee of the Commission for any purpose whatsoever. The
liabilities of any kind arising from the performance of the
contracted work covered by this Agreement and all Appendices
thereto are the responsibility of the Contractor.
SEC. 3. The staff employed by the Contractor shall meet the
Standards for professional qualifications as outlined in 36 CFR
61 (Attachment C), and be employed by competitive procurement.
Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly
prohibit unlawful discrimination in federally-assisted programs
on the basis of race, color, and/or national origin. Therefore,
the Contractor must sign DI Form 1350 (Attachment D) and return
signed form to the commission with this contract. In all cases
the person(s) employed by the Contractor to complete the work
specified in sec. 1 must meet with the approval of the
Commission. The professional hired must also attend an
//re C~lale•~~yeirc~/~oz .`7/w/auc %~ze walu~rr
orientation session with the commission's National Register staff
prior to commencing work.
SEC. 4. The contractor shall keep accurate financial
records available for audit by the Commission or by Federal
auditors three years from Project End Date. In addition to the
terms detailed in this Agreement, all Federal requirements
governing grants (office of Management and Budget Circulares A-87
or A-122, A-102 or A-110, and A-128) are applicable.
SEC. 5. All grant funds shall be spent in the manner and
amounts specified in the Approved Project Notification with
detailed Budget, a copy of which is attached to this document as
Attachment A.
SEC. 6. The work covered by this Agreement shall begin
April 15, 1994 and be completed by April 30, 1995. If for any
reason the work is not completed by such date or if the Agreement
is canceled due to Contractor's default, then all amounts paid
under this Agreement shall be immediately due and repayable to
the Commission. It is further agreed that all materials
stipulated in Attachment A and B and all reimbursement requests
be submitted to the Commission by-July 30, 1995.
SEC. 7. All documents referred to herein are hereby
specifically adopted as part :of this Agreement, as is set forth
herein.
The COMMISSION, in consideration of the hereinbefore
described undertaking by the Contractor, agrees as follows:
The Commission shall reimburse the Contractor exclusively
from U.S. Department of the Interior grant-in-aid funds for
historic preservation (Certified Local Government) upon the
receipt and approval of invoices from the Contractor as long as
the Contractor is in compliance with this Agreement, up to the
total grant sum of $11,735 as specified in the Grant Award Letter
(Attachment E). Such payments to be made as requested for
services actually rendered, or if mutually agreed, in one lump
sum up to the total grant sum, upon completion and approval of
all the requirements set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor
shall submit documented reimbursement requests to the commission
and the Commission will in turn reimburse the Contractor up to
one half of the requested figure. It is further agreed that a
sum not to exceed 25% of the total granted sum will be retained
by the commission until all stipulated materials and properly
documented reimbursement requests are submitted by the
contractor.
IT IS FURTHER AGREED and understood by both parties that:
SEC. 1. All materials published, printed, or used for
public distribution funded in whole or in part by the Commission
will note on its materials that the Texas Historical Commission
and the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service,
aided in financially assisting this work. However, the contents
and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of
the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade
names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation by the Department of the Interior.
SEC. 2. This Agreement may not be amended by either party
without the written consent of the other party. In special
cases, adjustment of the contractual requirements may be
necessary pursuant to recommendations by the National Register
Department with the approval of the Texas Historical Commission.
SEC. 3. The Commission reserves the right to terminate this
Agreement when it is determined that the Contractor has failed to
comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement or if it
is determined by both parties that the products being produced
are not beneficial to the project.
5th day of April, 1994.
THE TEXA HISTORICAL COMMISSION
by: /
xecutive Di~rector
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
r+ / r _
by:
Assistant Attorney"General
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
Attachment
A: Approved Project Notification (with detailed
budget) and attached Environmental Certification
B: Expected Products and Project Proposal
C: Standards for Professional Qualifications
D: DI form 1350
E: Grant Award Letter
PROJECT NOTIFICATION
TITLE: City of Denton CLG Grant
AREA AFFECTED BY PROJECT
(counties): Denton
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT:
26
STATE CONTACT PERSON:
Luis A. Arellano (512) 463-5852
GRANT NO.: 48-94-90065.006
TOTAL PROJECT COST: $24,700
FEDERAL SHARE: $11,735
NONFEDERAL SHARE: $12,965
TYPE: NEW K REVISION
PRE-DEVELOPMENT: YES No %
1. SUBGRANTEE: City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
2. NONFEDERAL MATCHING SHARE:
Donor: Subgrantee
Source: City of Denton
Kind: Cash and In-Kind
Amount: $12,965
3. BUDGET:
identification survey of Properties built before 1945
Contractual Services
Supervision (30 hours @ $16.'66)
Subtotal
Certified Local Government Conference
Travel, Per Diem and Lodging
Subtotal
PROJECT TOTAL
$23,000
500
$23,500
$1,200
$1,200
$24,700
4. PURPOSE: Initiate phased survey of historic resources and to
travel to the Certified Local Government Conference.
Anticipated products will be an inventory of all properties
constructed prior to 1945 and the attendance to the CLG Conference.
5. BEGINNING/END DATES: April 15, 1994 - April 30, 1995
6. An Environmental Certification is attached.
GRANT NO.: 48-94-90065.006
8. CERTIFICATION: As the duly authorized representative, I
certify that this subgrant will be administered and work will be
performed in accordance with the National Register Programs Manual
and the Secretary of the Interior's "Standards for Guidelines for
Planning, Identification, Evaluation and Registration." All
documentation required by the Manual will be maintained on file for
audit and State Program Approval purposes. All proposed costs for
personal compensation charged to the Federal or nonfederal share of
this subgrant are within the maximum limit imposed by Chapter 13,
Section B. 39.e. of NPS-49. These costs have been assessed by
knowledgeable SHPO staff and found to be within the normal and
customary range of charges for similar work in the local labor
market, and appear to be appropriate charges for the product to be
achieved with grant assistance.
i
3-30 9~
gnature Date
This Project Notification has been reviewed and determination made
that the information contained herein is in conformance with the
programmatic mandates, procedures, and legislation as outlined in
the National Register Programs Guideline (NPS-49).
Approved: l u ~y9t2~c~ 7 y~
IloiraO~rr°~en
ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION
Based upon a review of the application, proposal narrative, and he
supporting documentation contained in the application, it has been
determined that the proposed HPF project
City Of Denton FY 94 CLG Grant
meets the criteria for categorical exclusion under Section A.4-r.,
Plans, Studies and Repores. Chapter 4I,
I
& 5 ~ 2~
State Historic Preservation Officer
I Concur:
Regi at UIrViCUr (or deli re for
grant approval)
National Park ti,•rvi.r
date: 3- -m 9!~
~
dare: yU Z
EXPECTED PRODUCTS OF HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY AND INVENTORY
PROJECTS
Surveys are a process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic
resources. In as comprehensive a manner as possible, surveys document all pre-
1945 historic buildings, objects, structures, sites and districts within a given
geographical boundary. Surveys assign high, medium or low priority rankings to
these resources. Initial identification is followed by a phase that concentrates on
high priority properties, generally those which may be eligible for inclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places. Such resources are of significance in American
history, architecture, archeology and culture, and generally are more than 50 years of
age. The full range of products for a historic resources survey includes the
following, with representative samples appended.
A Texas Historic Sites Inventory Form (typewritten), or its approved equivalent,
must be provided for every (high priority) historic property in the survey area.
Photo documentation (including negatives) for all surveyed sites must be provided.
Either 4" x 5" or 35mm format may be used. For 35mm format, one contact sheet
and one completed Photo Index sheet must accompany each roll of film. Sample
forms are attached. In addition, 35mm slides of all high priority properties and
representative streetscapes are required. Proper identification of each view must be
provided with all photodocumentation.
Detailed Maps must identify the location of all surveyed properties and districts.
Local maps (preferably with building footprints) or USGS 7.5 series maps may be
used to clearly identify surveyed sites and their site numbers. A figure for the total
number of acres surveyed must also be provided.
A Final Report (two copies) must outline the survey's purpose and methodology.
In addition, observations about the background history of the area, patterns of
settlement, development trends and resource distribution shall be included. Results
should discuss analysis, implications and recommendations for local, state and
federal historical designation and other appropriate preservation methods. This
report must be in conformance with the attached U.S. Secretary of the Interior's
Guidelines for Identification.
All of the above-mentioned products become the property of the THC upon
completion of the grant project. Survey and inventory projects may modify the full
range of products, as specified by the attached Project Proposal.
44720 Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 190 / Thursday, September 29, 1983 / Notices
generally stated in terms of properly
types.
The purpose of establishing
preservation goals is to set forth a "best
case" version of how properties in the
historic context should be identified,
evaluated, registered and treated.
Preservation goals should be oriented
toward the greatest possible protection
of properties in the historic context and
should be based on the principle that
properties should be preserved in place
if possible, through affirmative
treatments like rehabilitation,
stabilization or restoration. Generally.
goals will be specific to the historic
context and will often be phrased in
terms of property types. Some of these .
goals will be related to information
needs previously identified for the
historic context. Collectively, the goals
for a historic context should be a
coherent statement of program direction
covering all aspects of the context.
For each goal, a statement should be
prepared identifying:
1. The goal, including the context and
property types to which the goal applies
and the geographical area in which they
are located;
2. The activities required to achieve
the goal;
3. The most appropriate methods or
strategies for carrying out the activities;
4. A schedule within which the
activities should be completed; and
5. The amount of effort required to
accomplish the goal, as well as a way to
evaluate progress toward its
accomplishment.
Setting priorities for goals
Once goals have been developed they
need to be ranked in importance.
Ranking involves examining each goal
in light of a number of factors.
1. General social, economic, political
and environmental conditions and
trends affecting (positively and
negatively) the identification,
evaluation, registration and treatment of
properly types in the historic context.
Some property types in-the historic
context may be more directly threatened
by deterioration, land development
patterns, contemporary use patterns, or
public perceptions of their value, and
such property types should be given
priority consideration;
2. Major cost or technical
considerations affecting the
identification, evaluation and treatment
of property types in the historic context.
The identification or treatment of
some property types may be technically
possible but the cost prohibitive; or
techniques may not currently perfected
(for example, the identification of
submerged sites or objects, or the
evaluation of sites containing material
for which dating techniques are still
being developed).
3. Identification, evaluation,
registration and treatment activities
previously carried out for property types
in the historic context.
if a number of properties representing
one aspect of a historic context have
been recorded or preserved, treatment
of additional members of that property
type may receive lower priority than
treatment of a property type for which
no examples have yet been recorded or
preserved. This approach ensures that
the focus of recording or preserving all.
elements of the historic context is
retained, rather than limiting activities
to preserving properties representing
only some aspects of the context.
The result of considering the goals in
light of these concerns will be a list of
refined goals ranked in order of priority.
Integrating Individual Contexts-
Creating the Preservation Plan
When historic contexts overlap
geographically, competing goals and
priorities must be integrated for
effective preservation planning. The
ranking of goals for each historic
context must be reconciled to ensure
that recommendations for one context
do not contradict those for another. This
important step results in an overall set
of priorities for several historic contexts
and a list of the activities to be
performed to achieve the ranked goals.
When applied to a specific, geographical
area, this is the preservation plan for
that area.
It is expected that in many instances
historic contexts will overlap
geographically. Overlapping contexts
are likely to occur in two
combinations-those that were defined
at the same scale (i.e., textile
development in Smithtown 1850-1910
and Civil War in Smithtown 1855-1870)
and those defined at different scales
(i.e., Civil War in Smithtown and Civil
War in the Shenandoah Valley). The
contexts may share the same property
types, although the shared property
types will probably have different levels
of importance, or they may group the
same properties into different property
types, reflecting either a different scale
of analysis or a different historical
perspective.
As previously noted, many of the
goals that the formulated for a historic
context will focus on the property types
defined for that context. Thus it is
critical that the integration of goals
include the explicit consideration of the
potential for shared property type
membership by individual properties.
For example, when the same property
types are used by two contexts,
reconciling the goals will require
weighing the level of importance
assigned to each property type. The
degree to which integration of historic
contexts must involve reconciling
property types may be limited by the
coordinated development of historic
contexts used at various levels.
integration with Management
Frameworks
preservation goals and priorities are
adapted to land units through
integration with other planning
concerns. This integration must involve
the resolution of conflicts that arise
when competing resources occupy the
same land base. Successful resolution of
these conflicts can often be achieved
through judicious combination of
inventory, evaluation and treatment
activities. Since historic properties are
irreplaceable, these activities should be
heavily weighted to discourage the
destruction of significant properties and
to be compatible with the primary land
use.
Recommended Sources of Technical
information
Resource Protection Planning Process.
State and Plans Grants Division, 1980.
Washington, D.C. Available from Survey and
Planning Branch, interagency Resources
Division, National Park Service, Department
of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240.
Outlines a step-by-step approach to
implementing the resource protection
planning process.
Resource Protection Planning Process Case
Studies. Available from Survey and Planning
Branch, Interagency Resources Division.
National Park Service, Department of the
Interior. Washington, D.C. 20240. Reports
prepared by State Historic Preservation
offices and other using the planning process.
Planning Theory. Andreas Faludi, 1980.
Oxford: Pergamon Press. Constructs a model
of planning using concepts borrowed from
general systems theory.
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S
STANDARDS FOR IDENTIFICATION
Identification activities are
undertaken to gather information about
historic properties in an area. The scope
of these activities will depend on:
existing knowledge about properties;
goals for survey activities developed in
the planning process; and current
management needs.
Standard I. Identification of Historic
Properties Is Undertaken to the Degree
Required To Make Decisions
Archival research and survey
activities should be designed to gather
the information necessary to achieve
defined preservation goals. The
Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 190 / Thursday, September 29, 1983 / Notices 44721
objectives, chosen methods and
techniques, and expected results of the
identification activities are specified in
a research design. These activities may
include archival research and other
techniques to develop historic contexts,
sampling an area to gain a broad
understanding of the kinds of properties
it contains, or examining every property
in an area as a basis for property
specific decisions. Where possible, use
of quantitative: methods is important
because it can produce an estimate,
whose reliability may be assessed, of
the kinds of historic properties that may
be present in the studied area.
Identification activities should use a
search procedure consistent with the
management needs for information and
the character of the area to be
investigated. Careful selection of
methods, techniques and level of detail
is necessary so that the gathered
information will provide a sound basis
for making decisions.
Standard 11. Results of Identification
Activities are Integrated Into the
Preservation Planning Process
Results of identification activities are
reviewed for their effects on previous
planning data. Archival research or field
survey may refine the understanding of
one or more historic contexts and may
alter the need for additional survey or
study of particular property types.
Incorporation of the results of these
activities into the planning process is
necessary to ensure that the planning
process is always based on the best
available information.
Standard 111. Identification Activities
include Explicit Procedures for Record-
Keeping and Information Distribution
Information gathered in identification
activities is useful in other preservation
planning activities only when it is
systematically gathered and recorded,
and made available to those responsible
for preservation planning. The results of
identification activities should be
reported in a format that summarizes
the design and methods of the survey,
provides a basis for others to review the
results, and states where information on
identified properties is maintained.
I fowever, sensitive information, like the
location of fragile resources, must be
safeguarded from general public
distribution.
Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for
Identification
Introduction
These Guidelines link the Standards
for Identification with more specific
guidance and technical information. The
Guidelines outline one approach to meet
the Standards for Identification.
Agencies, organizations and individuals
proposing to approach identification
differently may wish to review their
approaches with the National Park _
Service.
The Guidelines are organized as
follows:
Role of Identification in the Planning
Process
Performing Identification
Integrating Identification Results
Reporting Identification Results
Recommended Sources of Technical
Information
Role of Identification in the Planning
Process
Identification is undertaken for the
purpose of locating historic properties
and is composed of a number of
activities which include, but are not
limited to archival research, informant
interviews, field survey and analysis.
Combinations of these activities may be
selected and appropriate levels of effort
assigned to produce a flexible series of
options. Generally identification
activities will have multiple objectives,
reflecting complex management needs.
Within a comprehensive planning
process, identification is normally
undertaken to acquire property-specific
information needed to refine a particular
historic context or to develop any new
historic contexts. (See the Guidelines for
Preservation Planning for discussion of
information gathering to establish plans
and to develop historic contexts.) The
results of.identification activities are
then integrated into the planning
process so that subsequent activities are
based on the most up-to-date
information. Identification activities are
also undertaken in the absence of a
comprehensive planning process, most
frequently as part of a specific land-use
or development project. Even lacking a
formally developed preservation
planning process, the benefits of
efficent, goal-directed research may be
obtained by the development of
localized historic contexts, suitable in
scale for the project area, as part of the
background research which customarily
occurs before field survey efforts.
Performing Identification
Research Design
Identification activities are essentially
research activities for which a statement
of objectives or research design should
be prepared before work is performed.
Within the framework of a
comprehensive planning process, the
research design provides a vehicle for
integrating the various activities
performed during the identification
process and for linking those activities
directly to the goals and the historic
context(s) for which those goals were
defined. The research design stipulates
the logical integration of historic
context(s) and field and laboratory
methodology. Although these tasks may
be performed individually, they will not
contribute to the greatest extent
possible in increasing information on the
historic context unless they relate to the
defined goals and to each other.
Additionally, the research design
provides a focus for the integration of
interdisciplinary information. It ensures
that the linkages between specialized
activities are real, logical and address
the defined research questions.
Identification activities should be guided
by the research design and the results
discussed in those terms. (See Reporting
identification Results)
The research design should include
the following:
1. Objectives of the identification
activities. For example: to characterize
the range of historic properties in a
region: to identify the number of
properties associated with a context; to
gather information to determine which
properties in an area are significant.
The statement of objectives should
refer to current knowledge about the
historic contexts or property types,
based on background research or
assessments of previous research. It
should clearly define the physical extent
of the area to be investigated and the
amount and kinds of information to be
gathered about properties in the area.
2. Methods to be used to obtain the
information. For example: archival
research or field survey. Research
methods should be clearly and
specifically related to research
problems.
Archival research or survey methods
should be carefully explained so that
others using the gathered information
can understand how the information
was obtained and what its possible
limitations or biases are.
The methods should be compatible
with the past and present environmental
character of the geographical area under
study and the kinds of properties most
likely to be present in the area.
3. The expected results and the
reasons for those expections.
Expectations about the kind, number,
location, character and condition of
historic properties are generally based
on a combination of background
research, proposed hypotheses, and
analogy to the kinds of properties
known to exist in areas of similar
environment or history.
44722 Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 190 / Thursday, September 29, 1983 / Notices
Archival Research
Archival or background research is
generally undertaken prior to any field
survey. Where identification is
undertaken as part of a comprehensive
planning process, background research
may have taken place as part of the
development of the historic contexts
(see the Guidelines for Preservation
Planning). In the absence of previously
developed historic contexts, archival
research should address specific issues
and topics. It should not duplicate
previous work. Sources should include,
but not be limited to, historical maps,
atlases, tax records, photographs,
ethnographies, folklife documentation,
oral histories and other studies, as well
as standard historical reference works,
as appropriate for the research problem.
(See the Guidelines for Historical
Documentation for additional
discussion.)
Field Survey
The variety of field survey techniques
available, in combination with the
varying levels of effort that may be
assigned, give great flexibility to
implementing field surveys. It is
important that the selection of field
survey techniques and level of effort be
responsive to the management needs
and preservation goals that direct the
survey effort.
Survey techniques may be loosely
grouped into two categories, according
to their results. First are the techniques
that result in the characterization of a
region's historic properties. Such
techniques might include "windshield"
or walk-over surveys, with perhaps a
limited use of sub-surface survey. For
purposes of these Guidelines, this kind
of survey is termed a "reconnaissance."
The second category of survey
techniques is those that permit the
identification and description of specific
historic properties in an area; this kind
of survey effort is termed "intensive."
the terms "reconnaissance" and
"intensive" are sometimes defined to
mean particular survey techniques,
generally with regard to prehistoric
sites. The use of the terms here is
general and is not intended to redefine
the terms as they are used elsewhere..
Reconnaissance survey might be most
profitably employed when gathering
data to refine a developed historic
context-such as checking on the
presence or absence. of expected
property types, to define specific
property types or to estimate the
distribution of historic properties in an
area. The results of regional
characterization activities provide a
general understanding of the historic
properties in a particular area and
permit management decisions that
consider the sensitivity of the area in
terms of historic preservation concerns
and the resulting implications for future
land use planning. The data should
allow the formulation of estimates of the
necessity, type and cost of further
identification work and the setting of
priorities for the individual tasks
involved. In most cases, areas surveyed
in this way will require resurvey if more
complete information is needed about
specific properties.
A reconnaissance survey should
document:
1. The kinds of properties looked for;
2. The boundaries of the area
surveyed;
3. The method of survey, including the
extent of survey coverage;
4. The kinds of historic properties
present in the surveyed area;
5. Specific properties that were
identified, and the categories of
information collected; and
e. Places examined that did not
contain historic properties.
Intensive survey is most useful when
it is necessary to know precisely what
historic properties exist in a given area
or when information sufficient for later
evaluation and treatment decisions is
needed on individual historic properties.
Intensive survey describes the
distribution of properties in an area;
determines the number, location, and
condition of properties; determines the
types of properties actually present
within the area; permits classification of
individual properties; and records the
physical extent of specific properties.
An intensive survey should document:
1. The kinds of properties looked for;
2. The boundaries of the area
surveyed:
3. The method of survey, including an
estimate of the extent of survey
coverage:
4. A record of the precise location of
all properties identified; and
5. Information on the appearance,
significance, integrity and boundaries of
each property sufficient to permit an
evaluation of its significance.
Sampling
Reconnaissance or intensive survey
methods may be employed according to
a sampling procedure to examine less-
than=the-total project or planning area.
Sampling can be effective when
several locations are being considered
for an undertaking or when it is
desirable to estimate the cultural
resources of an area. In many cases,
especially where large land areas are
involved, sampling can be done in
stages. In this approach, the results of
the initial large area survey are used to
structure successively smaller, more
detailed surveys, This "nesting"
approach is an efficient technique since
it enables characterization of both large
and small areas with reduced effort. As
with all investigative techniques, such
procedures should be designed to permit
an independent assessment of results.
Various types of sample surveys can
be conducted, including, but not limited
to: random, stratified and systematic.
Selection of sample type should be
guided by the problem the survey is
expected to solve, the nature of the
expected properties and the nature of
the area to be surveyed.
Sample surveys may provide data to
estimate frequencies of properties and
types of properties within a specified
area at various confidence levels.
Selection of confidence levels should be
based upon the nature of the problem
the sample survey is designed to
address.
Predictive modeling is an application
of basic sampling techniques that
projects or extrapolates the number,
classes and frequencies of properties in
unsurveyed areas based on those found
in surveyed areas. Predictive modeling
can be an effective tool during the early
stages of planning an undertaking, for
targeting field survey and for other
management purposes. However, the
accuracy of the model must be verified:
predictions should be confirmed through
field testing and the model redesigned
and retested if necessary.
Special survey techniques
Special survey techniques may be
needed in certain situations.
Remote sensing techniques may be
the most effective way to gather
background environmental data. plan
more detailed field investigations,
discover certain classes of properties.
map sites, locate and confirm the
presence of predicted sites, and define
features within properties. Remote
sensing techniques include aerial,
subsurface and underwater techniques
Ordinarily the results of remote sensing
should be verified through independent
field inspection before mwAing any
evaluation or statement regarding
frequencies or types of properliea.
Integrating identification Results
The results of identification efforts
must be integrated into the planning
process so that planning decisions are
based on the best available information.
The new informantion is first assessed
against the objectives of the
identification effort to determine
whether the gathered information meets
Federal Register / Vol. 48, No. 190 / Thursday, September 29, 1983 / Notices 44723
the defined identification goals for the
historic context(s): then the goals are
adjusted accordingly. In addition, the
historic context narrative, the definition
of property types and the planning goals
for evaluation and treatment are all
adjusted as necessary to accommodate
the new data.
Reporting Identification Results
Reporting of the results of
identification activities should begin
with the statement of objectives
prepared before undertaking the survey.
The report should respond to each of the
major points documenting:
1. Objectives;
2. Area researched or surveyed;
3. Research design or statement of
objectives;
4. Methods used, including the
intensity of coverage. If the methods
differ from those outlined in the
statement of objectives, the reasons
should be explained.
5. Results: how the results met the
objectives; result analysis, implications
and recommedations; where the
compiled information is located.
A summary of the survey results
should be available for examination and
distribution. Identified properties should
then be evaluated for possible inclusion
in appropriate inventories.
Protection of information about
archeological sites or other properties
that may be threatened by
dissemination of that information is
necessary. These may include fragile
archeological properties or properties
such as religious sites, structures, or
objects, whose cultural value would be
compromised by public knowledge of
the property's location.
P.ecommended Sources of Technical
Information
The Archeological Survey: Methods and
Uses. Thomas F. King. Interagency
Archeological Services, U.S. Department of
the Interior, 1978. Washington, D.C. Available
through the Superintendent of Documents.
U.S. Government Printing Office.
Washington, D.C. 20402. CPO stock number
024-010-00091. Written primarily for the non-
archeologist, this publication presents
methods and objectives for archeological
surveys.
Cultural Resources Evaluation of the
Northern Gulf of Mexico Continental Shelf.
National Park Service, U.S. Department of the
Interior, 1977.
Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for
Preservation Planning. Anne Derry, H. Ward
Jandl, Carol Shull and Jan Thorman. National
Register Division, U.S. Department of the
Interior, 1978. Washington, D.C. Available
through the Superintendent of Documents.
U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, D.C. 20402. GPO stock number
024-010-0089-7. General guidance about
designing and carrying out community
surveys.
The Process of Field Research: Final
Report on the Blue Ridge Parkway Folklife
Project. American Folklife Center, 1981.
Regional Sampling in Archeology. David
Hurst Thomas. University of California,
Archeological Survey Annual Report, 1988-9,
11:87-100.
Remote Sensing., A Handbook for -
Archeologists and Cultural Resource
Managers. Thomas R. Lyons and Thomas
Eugene Avery. Cultural Resource
Management Division. National Park Service,
U.S. Department of the Interior. 1977.
Remote Sensing and Non-Destructive
Archeology. Thomas R. Lyons and James L
Ebert, editors. Remote Sensing Division,
Southwest Cultural Resources Center,
National Park Service, U.S. Department of the
Interior and University of New Mexico, 1978.
Remote Sensing Experiments in Cultural
Resource Studies: Non-Destructive Methods
of Archeological Exploration, Survey and
Analysis. Thomas R. Lyons, assembler.
reports of the Chaco Center. Number One.
National Park Service. U.S. Department of the
Interior and University of New Mexico, 1978.
Sampling in Archeology James W. Mueller,
editor. University of Arizona Press, 1975.
Tucson, Arizona.
Scholars as Contractors. William J. Mayer-
Oakes and Alice W. Portnoy, editors.
Cultural Resource Management Studies. U.S.
Department of the Interior, 1979.
Sedimentary Studies of Prehistoric
Archeological Sites. Sherwood Gagliano,
Charles Pearson, Richard Weinstein, Diana
Wiseman, and Christopher McClendon.
Division of State Plans and Grants, National
Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior,
19x2. Washington, D.C. Available from
Coastal Environments Inc., 1280 Main Street,
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802. Establishes
and evaluates a method for employing
sedimentological analysis in distinguishing
site areas from non-site areas when
identifying submerged archeological sites on
the continental shelf.
Slate Survey Forms. Available from
Interagency Resource Management Division,
National Park Service, Department of the
Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240.
Characterizes cultural resource survey
documentation methods in State Historic
Preservation Offices.
Truss Bridge Types: A Guide to Dating and
identifying. Donald C. Jackson and T. Allan
Comp. American Association for State and
Local History, 1977. Nashville, Tennessee.
Technical leaflet #95. Available from
AASLH, 708 Berry Road, Nashville,
Tennessee 37204. Information about
performing surveys of historic bridges and
identifying the types of properties
encountered.
Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Evaluation
Evaluation is the process of
determining whether identified
properties meet defined criteria of
significance and therefore should be
included in an inventory of historic
criteria. The criteria employed vary
depending on the inventory's use in
resource management.
Standard L Evaluation of the
Significance of Historic Properties Uses
Established Criteria
The evaluation of historic properties
employs criteria to determine which
properties are significant. Criteria
should therefore focus on historical,
architectural, archeological, engineering
and cultural values, rather than on
treatments. A statement of the minimum
information necessary to evaluate
properties against the criteria should be
provided to direct information gathering
activities.
Because the National Register of
Historic Places is a major focus of
preservation activities on the Federal.
State and local levels, the National
Register criteria have been widely
adopted not only as required for Federal
purposes, but for State and local
inventories as well. The National
Historic Landmark criteria and other
criteria used for inclusion of properties
in State historic site files are other
examples of criteria with different
management purposes.
Standard 17. Evaluation of Significance
Applies the Criteria Within Historic
Contexts
Properties are evaluated using a
historic context that identifies the
significant patterns that properties
represent and defines expected properly
types against which individual
properties may be compared. Within
this comparative framework, the criteria
for evaluation take on particular
meaning with regard to individual
properties.
Standard 111. Evaluation Results in A
List or Inventory of Significant
Properties That Is Consulted In
Assigning Registration and Treatment
Priorities
The evaluation process and the
subsequent development of an inventory
of significant properties is an on-going
activity. Evaluation of the significance
of a property should be completed
before registration to considered and
before preservation treatments are
selected. The inventory entries should
contain sufficient information for
subsequent activities such as
registration or treatment of properties,
including an evaluation statement that
makes clear the significance of the
property within one or more historic
contexts.
properties determined to meet the
1 LAMJ I IIJ 1 UrIIVM- ..vuun.+vw,.
TEXAS HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY FORM
* RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FORM *
County
City/Rural Date: Factual _
Historic Name Architect/Builder
Owner
Contractor-
Historic Use _
Site
Present Use
Legal Desc.
Property Type
Integrity of: D location
History of Property
Subtype
D design D setting
a materials
- Stylistic Influence
D workmanship O association
D feeling
Areas of Significance (include justification)
Bibliography (include oral
Surveyor
Photo Data: Roll/Frame _
Designations: _ NR
through Roll/Frame
RTHL _ HABS
DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING:
Location:
_ original location
moved (specify dale)
building faces (N/S/F_AN)
Stories:
specify # (1,114,2, etc.)
Construction:
_ frame
solid brick (specify color)
_ solid stone (specify color)
specify other
Plan:
L-plan
_ modified L-plan
_ center passage plan
(specify # of rooms deep)
2-room plan
_ T-plan
-bungalow plan
shotgun plan
_ asymmetrical plan
specify other
Foundation Materials:
pier-and-beam
_ stone
brick
specify other
Exterior wall surface:
weatherboard siding
drop siding
_ stucco
stone
_ board-and-batten siding
Date Surveyed
_ fieldstone veneer
_ brick (specify color)
wood shingle
synthetic siding
specify other
Porches:
specify # of bays
specify N/S/ENV elevation
shed roof
_ hipped roof
_ gable roof
_ inset
fumed-wood posts
_ square posts
_ chamlered wood posts
_ brick piers
-box columns
classical columns (specify)
_ tapered box supports:
_ full-height
on piers
fabricated metal
_ squared-wood balusters
fumed-wood balusters
_jig-sawn brackets
-lig-sawn porch frieze
fumed-work frieze
specify other
Windows:
-wood sash
_ aluminum sash
_ double-hung
casement
Slides
Local _ Other (REV. ] 91)
Paper meals minimum standards for Permanent printed materal.
_ fixed
_ decorative screenwork
(specify light configuration)
specify other
Doors/Entries:
_ single-door primary entrance
double-door primary entrance
_ 2 primary entrances
with transom
with sidelights
specify other
Gable End Treatment:
-same as wall surface
_ stucco
_ wood shingle
_ wood siding
_ decorative bargeboards
windows
_ vents
specify other
Roof Type:
-gable
- hipped
flaVwhh parapet
_ gambrel
_ dormers: (Specify
gable
hipped
_ shed
specify other
Roof Materiels:
_ wood shingles
_ composition shingles
tile
_ metal (specify type)
USGSQuad#
Est. Additions:
box eaves
_ exposed ratter ends
lig-sawn brackets
_ stick brackets
specify other
Chimneys:
specify number
interior (specify placement)
exterior (specify placement)
_ brick
_ stone
-with corbelled caps
_ stuccoed
specify other
Other:
Outbuildings:
(specify # and type)
-garage
-bun
_ shed
specify other
Landscape Features: (attach plan)
_ sidewalks
-terracing
_ drives
well or cistern
- gardens
I "AS li I UMIGAL GUMMIDbIUIV
TEXAS HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY FORM
* COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FORM *
County
Site #
City/Rural
Date: Factual _
Historic Name
Architect/Builder
Address
Contractor
Owner
Historic Use
Legal Desc.
Present Use _
Property Type Subtype _
Integrity of: ❑ location ❑ design ❑ setting
History of Property
Areas of Significance (include justification)
Bibliography (include oral
Surveyor
Photo Data: RoIVFrame _
Designations: _ NR
RTHL
Date Su rveyed
through Roll/Frame
HABS Local
Other
Slides
(REV.7 91)
Paper meats minimum standards for permanent printed materials.
I DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING:
Location:
_ original location
_ moved (specify date)
_ building faces (N/S/E/w)
Stories:
-specify # (1 11~ 2, etc.)
Construction:
- frame
solid brick (specify color)
solid stone (specify color)
specify other
Plan:
_ open plan
specify other
Exterlor Walls:
-stone (specify type)
_ stucco
synthetic siding
_ red brick
buff brick
_ polychromatic brick
_ wood siding
terra cotta ornamentation
_ party wall construction
specify other
Ground floor:
_ specify # of bays
_ symmetrically arranged
❑ materials
USGS Quad
Est. Additions:
-Stylistic Influence.
❑ workmanship ❑
association ❑ feeling
asymmetrically arranged
_ cast Iron pilasters
_ fixed sash display windows
_ aluminum sash
_ single-door entry
_ double-door entry
_ recessed central entry (specify # of doors)
_ stairway, door (specify placement)
transom (specify visible or covered)
canopy:
_ wood
_ metal
_ rod supported
_ chain supported
_ wall braced
specify other
Rear Elevation:
_ on alley
_ loading dock
_ loading door
_ windows
specify other
Upper floor:
-specify # of bays
_ symmetrically arranged
- asymmetrically arranged
windows:
_ specify #
_ flat-arched
_ segmetally arched
_ round-arched
_ hood moldings
_ lintels
voussoirs
_ wood sash
_ aluminum sash
F specify casement windows
(specify light configuration)
specify other
Parapet:
_ (specify # of parts)
corbelled brickwork
_ decorative brickwork
_ metal letters
brick letters
pressed-metal cornice
_ painted detailing
date and name (specify)
Roof:
- hipped roof
-gable roof
flat root
(specify materials)
_ chimneys or flues
specify other
Other:
x
x
x
x x
m
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
s
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
r
x
~
~
~
25
~
~
o
w
°
H
yy~~
~5
yy,,
5
yy,~
2'i
n
a
r
w
N
g
0
0
0
co
N
a
m
K
m
m
m
V c
m
n
m
m
}
~
Cn
w
~n
z
z
z
z
y
$
r
g
r
d
G)
G)
G)
o
G)
G)
0
G)
0
m
3
3
3
m
m
m
m
a
(n
m
Q
z
y
<
<
F ,
~
o
o
o
o
O
°
o
o
y
y
N
a,
`
c
A
m
N
r.
x
x
0
m
y
0
9
D
D
00
z
0
C)
o
o
_
n
F
N
y
ymy
CL
n
N
J
z
m
w.
n
N
N
O
O
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
S
S
S
B
g
S
g
S
g
'
S
~
S
S
S
S
S
8
8
S
8
S
S
S
8
8
S
8
8
S
8
S
S
S
S
8
S
S
:
ME
~
N
N
N
N
N
y
N
N
N
n
n
n
n
n'
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
m
n
n
n
n
n
ci
n
n
n
n
n
ii
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
0
n
n
o
p~
m
m
ry
~
-
r
N
m
m
N
m
m
r
N
m
m
m
N
m
m
m
m
m
y
N
m
m
m
m
D
=
D
a cr.
v
8
d
~
>
>
3
.
'
a
$
o
n
n
6
g
$
'o
no
$
~
$
w
$
c
g
g
9
3
m
o
o
s
g
o
S
n
°
s
s
n
3
s
s
s
s
6
3
3
s
s
?o
S
v
°
v
m
c
£
£
m
£
£
£
£
£
£
£
£
y
£
ti
£
£
£
£
N
r
m
N
y
y
N
(D
n
N
~
N
m
y
m
m
m
~
J
(n
m
N
tD
m
3
3
0
0
>
m
>
j
-
D
n
m
D
m
S
m
<
c
m
<
<
m
-
D
m
<
Q~
QQ
~
C)
(n
Q~
Q~
Q~
N
Q
~
N
~
Q~
~
Q~
Q`L
Q~
N
~
Q~Q
Q~Q
~
Q~Q
QrQ{
~
~
QQ~
o
'
$2
52
2i
~
$Z
21
$2
2S
52
2i
°i m
m m
L~
21
~
"
=
2S
~
21
21
"
2i
~
ti
ti
2S
2i
c"i
2i
2i
2S
2i
m
rn
2l
cn
m
cn
2i
rn
m 5
m
Cn
o
o
S
~
S
S
S
:
,
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
n
m
m
o
o
te
m
o
o
m
w
m
w
w
m
u~i
n",
m
m
m
m
m
no,
not
m
m
d
n
t
m
w
t
n
a
+
c
,
w
t
n
t
n
t
n
i
o
n
,
o
i
a
,
i
o
o
,
(O
Q
<p
J tp
cp
N
~O
tD
N
t0
O
~D
W
tp
fD
N
cD
p
~D
O
tp
~D
W
~O
tO
O
tD
tD
W
tD
W
~O
~O
~O
W
[p
W
tp
~
p
O
W
f
W
(l
N
~ O
O
U
~
i O
A
O
~
O
~
O
~~pp
O
ttDD
(OJ
O
(WJ
(1
[
p
O
~ N
O
~
N
O
O
N
c
n (T
0
0
0
(n
O
O
O
to
N
O
(n
O
(n
cT
(l
~ (n
O
O
O
O
O
T
A
A
V
1 V
~ A
A
A
A
A
A A
(T
W
W
W
W
A
A
A
(P
lP
W
N
A
A
N W W L?
O
W
W
"
W
A
j
N
N
J
A
J
O
f
(
J ~
I W
N
W
i
i
i
: O
m
V
O
O
d
O
o
W
N
-
D
' W W m tD
A V
= O
!V
O
> A
. (
(
a
f
m
f
N
I
D
V V
a
s
(
T A
W
N
O D
D
a
a
W
m
O
N
O
a
I
a
@ °
D
a
a
a
>
a
°
m
O
O
N
n
O
j
~ NW
D
~ O
N
v
V C
a
O
a
➢
~
o
m
w
D
m
~
m
N
N
N
W
N N
HISTORIC SITES INVENTORY FORM
COMMERCIAL/INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY
County Hays Site No.: 117 USGS Ouad # 3097-221
CiryrRural Buda Date: Factual 1898 Est. Adtns 1901
Historic Name Buda Mercantile Company Building Architect/Builder Unknown
Address 200 N Main Contractor
Owner Carl R. Chelf Historic Use General Store/Dry Goods
Legal Desc. Pt of Lot 5 & Lot 6 Blk 3 Original town of Buda Present Use Antique Store
Property Type Commercial Subtype 1-Part Commercial Stylistic Inf.
Integrity of location X design X setting X materials X workmanship X association feeling X
History of Property Lots 5 & 6 sold to W W Haupt by C W Daniel in 1882: Later sold to Buda Mercantile Co in 1898
Built in 1898 and expanded in 1901. Lots 3,4,5 &6 sold to W. S. Birdwell by Buda Mercantile Co. in 1914:
Store closed in late 1930s.
Areas of Significance : Architecture This noteworthy 1-part commercial block is an outstanding example of
19th century vernacular masonry construction. It is the oldest extant commercial building in Buda.
It features 6 entry bays highlighted by dressed stone voussoirs and keystone.
Bibliography (include oral histories) HCDR Book R, pp. 319-21. HCDR Vol 59 p. 268: HCDR Vol 85. pp. 252-53.
Onion Creek Free Press, Oct. 3, 1981:
Surveyor Newlan
Photo Data: RolUFrame 1:16A 8:9,10
Designations: NR RTHL
PRIORITY. High X Medium
Location
X original location
moved (specify date)
SE building faces (N/S/EA(V)
Stories
1 specify # (1,2)
Construction
_ frame
solid brick (specify color)
X solid stone (cream)
specify other
Plan
x open plan
specify other
Exterior Walls
x stone (limestone)
_ stucco
_ synthetic siding
_ red brick
_ buff brick
_ polychromatic brick
_ wood siding
terra cotta ornamentation
X party wall construction
specify other
Ground Floor
6 specify # of bays
X symmetrically arranged
asymmetricany arranged
_ cast iron pilasters
_ fixed sash display windows
_ aluminum sash
single-door entry
Date Surveyed 11/21/91
Slides 3
HABS Local Other
Low
double-door entry
X mutiple-door entry
_ recessed central entry of doors)
_ stairway door (specify placement)
transom (specify visible or covered)
canopy
wood
metal
_ rod supported
chain supported
wall braced
specify other
Rear Elevation
_ on alley
loading dock
X loading door
X windows
X single-door entry
specify other
Upper Floor
specify # of bays
symmetrically arranged
asymmetrically arranged
windows
_ specify #
_ flat-arched
_ segmentally arched
round-arched
hood moldings
lintels
_ voussoirs
_ wood sash
aluminum sash
_ metal casement windows
(light configuration)
specify other
Parapet
3 (specify # of parts)
_ corbelled brickwork
decorative brickwork
metal letters
_ brick letters
_ pressed-metal cornice
painted detailing
X date and name (1898 & 1901)
specify other
Roof
_ hipped roof
gable roof
X flat roof
specify materials if known
chimneys or flues
specify other
Other
6 round arch double-door
entrances w/ transoms on SE
elevation
each arch formed by voussoirs
and keystone
3 stepped parapets
loading doors on NE,SW, and
NW elevations
Proiect
ETJ)
Photographer
-
Date
Nov. 1991
Film Type Roll
Plus X 1
No.
Frame
No.
Name/Address
View
Camera
Facing
USGS
Quad
Site
No.
2A
310 S Main
E
Oblique
w
3097-221
103
3A
306 S Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
104
4A
204 S Main
E
Oblique
w
3097-221
105
SA
200 S Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
106
6A
108 S Main
S
Oblique
N
30971221
107
7A
104 S Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
108
8A
100 N Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
109
9A
104 N Main
SE
Elevation
NW
3097-221
110
10A
108 N Main
SE
Elevation
NW
3097-221
i l l
11A
108 N Main
SE
Elevation
NW
3097-221
112
12A
112 N Main
E
Oblique
w
3097-221
113
13A
116 N Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
114
14A
100 blk N Main
E
View
NW
3097-221
115
15A
120 N Main
E
Oblique
w
3097-221
116
16A
200 N Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
117
17A
210 N Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
118
18A
212 N Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
119
19A
214 N Main
SE
Elevation
NW
3097-221
120
20A
216 N Main
SE
Elevation
NW
3097-221
121
21A
218 N Main
SE
Elevation
NW
3097-221
122
22A
222 N Main
E
Oblique
w
3097-221
123
23A
300 N Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
124
24A
306 N Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
125
25A
300 blk N Main
E
Oblique
w
3097-221
126
26A
320 N Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
127
27A
400 blk N Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
128
28A
400 blk N Main
S
Oblique
N
3097-221
129
29A
407 N Austin
W
Oblique
E
3097-221
102
30A
307 N Austin
W
Oblique
E
3097-221
101
31A
101 S San Marcos
W
Oblique
E
3097-221
090
32A
105 S San Marcos
W
Oblique
E
3097-221
089
33A
111 S San Marcos
W
Oblique
E
3097-221
088
34A
301 S Bluff
W
Oblique
E
3097-221
082
35A
317 N Railroad
SW
Oblique
NE
3097-221
139
36
309 N Railroad
Oblique
N
-221
138
- - I
LEGEND
PRESERVATION PRIORITY
® HIGH PRIORITY
® MEDIUM PRIORITY
❑ LOW PRIORITY
xL
I
/ O81 I If
m~
IF
/ O82
p~S
❑4 -
SAN ANTONIO ST. /
/l
011 O 2
/
Q4 ,3r 017 1819 0® 1291
If ^ c87 0 0128
35 86
®
0
8
i 63 0
49 `
l
9s
94 Q
92 / 053/
( R.M.12770 )
O
104
0 ~
r `PG
/
22
0 23 1271
0 Z4111 0 ®12 /
aft 1~5 /
250 ® 12
40 123
119 /
41 w1117
/
116 j
115
114 /
11121 / -j HubL
110 / v
109 z
OS
T NOljSTON
/ I
;pC
CHERRY
A NsG~MWA~_ C
STANDARDS FOR PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
To insure that appropriate historical, architectural, archeological, and cultural
properties are identified for public benefit through grant-in-aid assistance, the
following minimal professional standards for historical, architectural and
archeological documentation have been established by the Preservation Assistance
Division of the National Park Service. Persons supervising grant projects must be
professionally qualified in accordance with 36 CFR 66, as follows:
STANDARDS FOR PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: In the following definition, a year
of full-time professional experience need not consist of a continuous year of full-
time work but may be made up of discontinuous periods of full-time or part-time
work adding up to the equivalent of a year of full-time experience.
(1) HISTORY: The minimum professional qualifications in history are a graduate
degree in history or closely related field; or a bachelor's degree in history or closely
related field plus one of the following:
(a) at least two years of full-time experience in research, writing,
teaching, interpretation or other demonstrable professional activity
with an academic institution, historical organization or agency,
museum, or other professional institution; or
(b) substantial contribution through research and publication to the
body of scholarly knowledge in the field of history.
(2) ARCHEOLOGY: The minimum professional qualifications in archeology are a
graduate degree in archeology, anthropology, or closely related field plus;
(a) at least one year of full-time professional experience or equivalent
specialized training in archeological research, administration or
management;
(b) at least four months of supervised field and analytical experience in
general North American archeology; and,
(c) demonstrated ability to carry research to completion.
In addition to these minimum qualifications, a professional in prehistoric
archeology shall have at least one year of full-time professional experience at a
supervisory level in the study of archeological resources of the prehistoric period. A
professional in historic archeology shall have at least one year of full-time
professional experience at a supervisory level in the study of archeological resources
of the historic period.
(3) ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY: The minimum professional qualifications in
architectural history are a graduate degree in architectural history, art history,
historic preservation, or closely related field, with coursework in American
architectural history; or a bachelor's degree in architectural history, art history,
historic preservation, or closely related field plus one of the following:
(a) at least two years of full-time experience in research, writing, or
teaching in American architectural history or restoration architecture
with an academic institution, historical organization or agency
museum, or other professional institution; or
(b) substantial contribution through research and publication to the
body of scholarly knowledge in the field of American architectural
history.
(4) ARCHITECTURE: The minimum professional qualifications in architecture are a
professional degree in architecture plus at least two years of full-time professional
experience in architecture; or a State license to practice architecture.
(5) HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE: The minimum professional qualifications in historic
architecture are a professional degree in architecture or a State license to practice
architecture, plus one of the following:
(a) at least one year of graduate study in architectural preservation,
American architectural history, preservation planning, or a closely
related field; or
(b) at least one year of full-time professional experience on historic preservation
projects. Such graduate study or experience shall include detailed investigations of
historic structures, and preparation of plans and specifications for preservation
projects.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
CIVIL RIGHTS ASSURANCE
As the authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant agrees that, as a
condition to receiving any Federal financial assistance from the Department of the Interior, it will
comply with all Federal laws relating to nondiscrimination. These laws include but are not limited
to: (a) Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1), which prohibits discrimination on the
basis of race, color, or national origin; (b) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29
U.S.C. 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap; (c) the Age Discrimination Act of
1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq. ),which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; and
applicable regulatory requirements to the end that no person in the United States shall, on the
grounds of race, color, national origin, handicap or age, be excluded from participation'in, be denied
the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by
the applicant. THE APPLICANT HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it will immediately take
any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement.
THIS ASSURANCE shall apply to all aspects of the applicant's operations including those parts that
have not received or benefitted from Federal financial assistance.
If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial
assistance extended to the Applicant by the Department, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant,
or in the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period during which the real
property or structure is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for
another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. If any personal property is so
provided, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant for the period during which it retains ownership
or possession of the property. In all other cases, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant for the
period during which the Federal financial assistance is extended to it by the Department.
THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal
grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other Federal financial assistance extended after the
date hereof to the Applicant by the Department, including installment payments after such date on
account of applicants for Federal financial assistance which were approved before such date.
The Applicant recognizes and agrees that such Federal financial assistance will be extended in
reliance on the representations and agreements made in this assurance, and that the United States
shall have the right to seek judicial enforcement of this assurance. This assurance is binding on the
Applicant, its successors, transferees, assignees, and subrecipients and the person whose signature
appears below who is authorized to sign this as~)arance on behalf of the Applicant.
SIGNATURE
ty o
APPLICANT /oRC~ANIZATION MAILING
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
TITLE
DATE
BUREAU OR OFFICE EXTENDING ASSISTANCE
National Park Service
DE-1750
(RE V."I )
A4
~PCE OF
CUM IS I'UNNIi I"I"
FXIVII'I'l Vli DINT(-IOF
T E X A S HI S T O R I C A L
F.O. ROX 1'176 AUSIIN.'I'FXAS 7X711-"76 IIIiLGI11IONF1 512-40-611111
30 March 1994
Honorable Bob Castleberry
City of Denton
215 E. McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
Dear Mayor Castleberry:
C O M M I S S I O N
WAS) 512-463-609S (N-I.AY TX) 1-NMI-735-2999 (TDD)
The Texas Historical Commission is pleased to announce the allocation of a $11,735 grant to the
City of Denton in conjunction with your participation in the Certified Locs'. Government (CLG)
program. The U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, provided funding for this
grant under the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.
The National Park Service recently approved your Project Proposal to initilte a survey of historic
resources in your community ($11,135) and travel to the CLG workshop in San Angelo ($600).
To remain eligible for this grant allocation, it is necessary for the project coordinator and the
project professional, if applicable, to participate in a grant orientation session. Designed to
familiarize you with the granting process, this session will provide an opportunity to discuss your
project with the Commission staff members responsible for its coordination. Please note that no
work should begin prior to your grant orientation session and finalization of a written contract
(copy enclosed) between you and the Texas Historical Commission.
Failure to participate in this orientation session and to submit a signed contract before
commencement of work on this project will be cause for this grant allocation to revert to the Texas
Historical Commission for reallocation to another project. Upon receipt of this letter, please
contact Bruce Jensen at (512) 463-6046 to arrange the necessary grant orientation session. We
look forward to working with you in this most worthwhile preservation endeavor.
Sincerely,
Karl Komatsu
Chairman
xc: Hon. Phil Gramm
Hon. Kay Bailey Hutchison
Hon. Dick Armey
Curtis Tun ell
)e -
Executive Director
'Ac State Agency for?fistoric Preservation