Loading...
1988-0860923L NO AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING COMPETITIVE BIDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS OR IMPROVEMENTS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City has solicited, received and tabulated competitive bids for the construction of public works or improvements in accordance with the procedures of state law and City ordinances, and WHEREAS, the City Manager or a designated employee has received and recommended that the herein described bids are the lowest responsible bids for the construction of the public works or improvements described in the bid invitation, bid proposals and plans and specifications therefore, NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS SECTION I That the following competitive bids for the construct on o public works or improvements, as described in the "Bid Invitations", "Bid Proposals' or plans and specifications attached hereto are hereby accepted and approved as being the lowest responsible bids BID NUMBER CONTRACTOR AMOUNT 9810 Participation Westgate Hills North $ 4,816 50 Phase I for Water Main SECTION II That the acceptance and approval of the above competitive Ms shall not constitute a contract between the City and the person submitting the bid for construction of such public works or improvements herein accepted and approved, until such person shall comply with all requirements specified in the Notice to Bidders including the timely execution of a written contract and furnishing of performance and payment bonds, after notification of the award of the bid SECTION III That the City Manager is hereby authorized to executed necessary written contracts for the performance of the construction of the public works or improvements in accordance with the bids accepted and approved herein, provided that such contracts are made in accordance with the Notice to Bidders and Bid Proposals, and documents relating thereto specifying the terms, conditions, plans and specifications, standards, quantities and specified sums contained therein SECTION IV That upon acceptance and approval of the above competitive bids and the execution of contracts for the public works and improvements as authorized herein, the City Council hereby authorizes the expenditure of funds in the manner and in the amount as specified in such approved bids and authorized contracts executed pursuant thereto SECTION V That this ordinance shall become effective imme lately upon its passage and approval PASSED AND APPROVED this the 17th day of May, 1988 Y S BENS MAYOR ATTEST J NI L ERS, C TY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM DEBRA ADAMI DRAYOVITCH, CITY ATTORNEY BY t~ vv ~ PAGE TWO DATE May 17, 1988 CITY COUNCIL REPORT TO Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM Lloyd V Harrell, City Manager SUBJECT BID# 9910 - PARTICIPATION WESTGATE HILLS NORTH I WATER MAIN RECOIQIENDATION This bid for participation for oversize water main for this addition The Public Utility Advisory Board has recommended approval for this project We then recommend this be approved by the Council for participating in the construction of a 12" water main in the amount of $4,816 50 SUMMARY This bid was received on December 17, 1987 for participation of projects for this development In March, the Council approved the participation in the construction of oversized street work This is for the oversize water main construction BACKGROUND. Bid summary tabulation Public Utility Advisory Board minutes PROGRAMS, DEPART14ENTS OR GROUPS AFFECTED. Utility Department FISCAL IMPACT There is no additional impact on the General Fund Respectfully submitted oy V Harrell Cit Manager Prepared by i 4i/il ~t+rLCL~L Irme i/ John J Marshall, C P M itle' Purchasing Agent Approved Namq John J Marshall, C 'P M Title, Purchasing Agent ae5'aa+a 11 s 4 SE Ad -.8aar St ;end dataru :a er ur ffarence 1 jatlaa,.od, 7c 122,444 37 F 4,764 4 $5,6d9 a rer P1v no 'a $16,539 :5 'll 183 .2 FS ':n 5 av Cars • F 8 549 :5 f 1 495 A :5: aa. _.,r,c at 6 a 5 ~ 33 a .2 4 .y 903 6a aaae A 111,957 7 tO 431 7 14,456 is I C 'a BRta s2l'a35 as $,5 479 31 14,546 23 a 'a 4 << 999 55 f 5 n2 Sf a ; as ar l1 as a _ 14 -a•h % C tar C: 5 . 2a F 8 975 12 4 ant 33 n 19aaaon a _ F 9,37n i1- 5 Fp 9n '@ a5L rc 4" 1. cHler _ at J2:,:43 75 r t,,25 3 d : L4:, aalanal J`1! ` ea F16,a:n :5 3,452 23 „ . _ ' n ct a•s c , 1 5 134 °a . '..ra a 1+~ 412 22 EXCERPT PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD February 10, 1988 l,U1TG1 VIII VILn n1~V/Vn 11'41 .'vV.v, Bul d ng, Denton, Tx 76 Ol, FOR A NEW WATER LINE to the WESTGATE HILLS NORTH SUBDIVISION, PHASE I Ham covered this item stating that Jesse Coffey is developing a site near Westgate and Payne Drive The development requires an 811 line, and the city is requesting a 1211 line be installed to serve the general area The line will be extended approximately 1,464 feet The cost to Denton is $4,816 50 No pro rata reimbursement is due on this water line since the unserved area is platted with lots extending from streets running perpendicular to this line and, therefore, their service will be from another line Estimated costs for an 811 to 1211 oversize section of water line to be paid for by the city of Denton are as follows Total cost of a 1211 water $20,748 00 line -741 LF x $28/LF Total cost of an 811 water line $15,931 50 741 LF x $21 50/LF Cost of this project to the City of Denton (difference between a 1211 water line and an 811 water line $4,816 50 Laney stated that he has reviewed the oversize policy of the Public Utilities Board The Board can ask the developer to pay for the complete oversize costs However, Laney thought the developer had the option of installing the smaller line if the City refused to participate in the oversize The Charter states that the City may participate in such oversizing Nelson expressed that the staff is administering the subdivision rules and regulations such that the line must be installed to the size specified by the City, in genera accordance with the master water and sewer plans, but that oversizing payments on the part of the City are optional, however, the City has nearly always agreed to pay oversize LaForte asked what has become of the impact fee' Laney reviewed the current situation advising that the City Council has tabled this until a future time Page 2 Thompson stated he wished to speak for approval of the oversizing request and indicated some disagreement with the above staff interpretation, commenting that if this request is voted down, the Board must also vote down all other requests for oversize participation Harrell stated that the development plan which is under review by Council and will most probably be adopted by the Lity Council speaks of using this policy to promote compact growth This follows the idea of City participation inside the Loop, but if the development occurs outside the Loop, the developer must pay all costs Thompson made a motion to approve the overszzing and City participation on this line Second by Frady Four ayes, one nay (Chew) Motion carried 9 CO IDER PROPOSED SEWER LINE PRO RATA AGREEMENT WITH JESSE Co UWiJEH ANU/UK -T MR ASSIGNS O 614 First State Ban Building, Denton, Tx 162U I, FOR A NEW SEWER LINE EXTENSION TO THE WESTGATE HILLS NORTH SUBDIVISION, PHASE I Ham reviewed this item explaining that a developer is entitled to pro rata agreement per City ordinance to recover costs from other developers that tie onto the line over a twenty year period There is no cost to the city other than administrative costs. Jesse Coffey is developing a site near Westgate and Payne Drive and will be extending approximately 1,464 linear feet of off site sewer line eligible for this pro rata and has requested a pro rata agreement for this line Thompson made a motion to approve subject pro rata agreement Second by Frady Laney and the Board agreed, after general discussion, that the Utility needs to study whether or not a fee charge of two to three percent of the cost of the project would be prudent on such applications to cover administrative costs The Board requested staff to study this concept and make a recommendation Laney then called for a vote on the motion All ayes, no nays Motion carried 5494U 12-13 A, 1 I 1 1 rj 1 1 1 EXHIBIT 1 b.~wr L T_ _ ~l