Loading...
1982-105 ORDINANCE NO 82- /~ ORDINANCE CANVASSING ELECTION RETURNS THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON WHEREAS, the C~ty Councll of sald C~ty ordered an elect~on to be held ~n sa~d C~ty on DECEMBER 11, 1982, on the PROPOSI- TIONS hereinafter stated, and WHEREAS, sa~d C~ty Council has ~nvest~gated all matters pertaining to sa~d e!ect~on, ~nclud~ng the ordering, g~v~ng not~ce, officers, holding, and making returns of sa~d elect~on, and WHEREAS, the elect~on officers who held sa~d elect~on have duly made the returns of the result thereof, and sa~d returns have been duly de!~vered to th~s C~ty Council THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS 1 That the C~ty Councll officially f~nds and determines that sa~d elect~on was duly ordered, that proper not~ce of sa~d electzon was duly g~ven, that proper elect~on officers were duly appointed prior to sa~d elect~on, that sa~d elect~on was duly held, that due returns of the result of sa~d elect~on have been made and delivered, and that the C~ty Council has duly canvassed sa~d returns, all ~n accordance w~th law and the Ordinance calling sa~d elect~on 2 That the C~ty Council officially f~nds and determines that the following votes were cast at sa~d e!ect~on on each submitted PROPOSITION, by the resident, qualified electors of sa~d C~ty who voted at the elect~on PROPOSITION NO 1 825 VOTES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $8,215,000 OF STREET AND SIDEWALK IM- PROVEMENT BONDS 1013 VOTES AGAINST PROPOSITION NO 2 1007 VOTES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $3,282,000 OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT BONDS 811 VOTES AGAINST PROPOSITION NO 3 865 VOTES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $218,000 OF PARK BONDS 97] VOTES AGAINST PROPOSITION NO 4 957 VOTES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $900,000 OF UNIVERSITY DRIVE IM- PROVEMENT BONDS 890 VOTES AGAINST PROPOSITION NO 5 795 VOTES FOR ) THE ISSUAkCE OF $1,100,000 OF MUNICIPAL BUILDING IM- PROVEMENT BONDS 1051 VOTES AGAINST ) PROPOSITION NO 6 1043 VOTES FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $450,000 OF FIRE SUBSTATION BONDS 778 VOTES AGAINST ) PROPOSITION NO 7 1018 VOTES FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $110,000 OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS BONDS 808 VOTES AGAINST ) 3 That the City Council officially finds, determines, and declares the result of said election to be that each of the foregoing PROPOSITIONS NOS 2, 4, 6, and 7 so submitted has received a favorable majority vote in all respects and has carrled, and that the bonds voted thereunder may be issued ~n accordance with law, but that each of the foregoing PROPOSTIONS NOS 1, 3, and 5 failed to carry, and that no bonds shall be issued thereunder ~I'~'IC~E FOR ORDIS~NCE CANVASSING ~I~ ~S ~ s~ OF ~ C~ OF D~ CI~ OF D~ ~. ~e ~ders%~ off~s of ~ld Cl~. he~y ce~ as foll~ 1 ~e Cmty ~cml of ~md Cm~ ~n~ SP~ ~'i'~ ~ ~ 14~ DAY OF D~. 1982. at ~e ~%c~1 ~ll~g (Clty ~11). ~d ~ roll was cal!~ of ~ d~y constm~t~ off%~rs ~d ~rs of ~d C~ ~cml. ~t ~i~te ~1~. C~ ~e~ ~c~d O St~. ~r Dr A ~y St~h~s 5~k Jack ~n J~ ~le~er ~les Ho~s J~ ~ford ~d allied.sons ~ ~re~t. ~ce~ ~e foll~ng ~s~t~s [ ~/~ ~~ , ~US ~nstl~g a ~o~ ~,-~g o~ b~s~ess, ~e foll~g was ~~ at ~d ~g a ~ltt~ 0~ ~S~G ~s ~y ~c~ for ~e ~lderatl~ of sa~d C~ ~c~l ~ d~y r~d It ~s ~ d~y ~ ~d ~ ~t sa~d ~ ~ ~s~, ~d, aft~ ~e ~s~sszon, ~ld ~on, ~g ~ it ~e ~s~ge of ~d ~ce, pre~l~ ~d c=1~ by ~e foll~g ~S ~1 ~s of s~d C~ ~c~! S~ pre~t ~ ~ "Aye" ~S ~ne 2 ~t a ~, ~1, ~d ~ ~ of ~ afores~d ~ ~s~ at ~e ~t~g descr~ ~ ~ ~e ~ for~o~g ~a~aph is at~ to ~d roll. s ~s ~f~ts, ~d Ci~ ~cil's ~u~s of ~ld ~t~g, ~t ~ ~ ~ fo~g p~a~ is a ~e, ~1, ~d ~e~ ~c~t fr~ sa~d CI~ ~cll's ~utes of ~id ~t~g ~g ~sons ~ ~ ~e ~ ~d for~o~g ~a~aph ~e ~ d~y chose, ~llfl~, ~d a~g offl~s ~d ~s of said Cl~ ~cll as ~cat~ ~ere~, ~t each of ~d ~flcl~tly notlfl~ offlci~ly ~d ~n~ly, ~ a~ce, of ~e t~, pla~, ~d ~se of ~c~ ~nd ~l~r~ for ~s~ at sa~d ~t~g, ~d ~t ~d ~g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c, ~d ~c ~tice of ~e t~, place, ~d ~se of ~d ~t~g was g~, all as r~ ~ Ve~on's ~ C~v St ~cle 6252-17 3 ~t ~e ~or of ~d Ci~ ~s a~r~, afore~d ~, ~t ~e ~yor d~y sl~ said ~ce, ~d ~t ~e ~r ~d ~ C~ ~ of ~ld C~ ~r~ d~l~e ~t ~e~ s~g of ~s ~f~ca~ s~ll ~nst~te ~ sl~g of ~e at~ ~s~~ I ~ of ~c~, 1982 (S~)-- . ..... ....... _%__ ..... ~. ~e ~ersl~. ~g really ~e C~ Attorney ~d ~e At~eys of ~ Ci~ of ~n. ~s. her~y ce~ ~t ~ pr~ ~nd a~r~ as to l~all~ ~e at~c~ ~d foll~g ~ prlor ~ lts ~ssage as aforesaid ORDINANCE NO 82-/~kg ORDINANCE CANVASSING ELECT~-~N RETURNS THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON CITY OF DENTON W/4EREAS, the City Council of said City ordered an election to be held in said City on DECEMBER 11, 1982, on the PROPOSI- TIONS hereinafter stated, and W~EREAS, said City Council has lnvest!qated all matters pertaining to said elect~on, ~ncludlng the ordering, giving notice, officers, holding, and making returns of said election, and WBEREAS, the election officers who held said election have duly made the returns of the result thereof, and said returns have been duly delivered to this City Council THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS 1 That the City Council officially finds and determines that said election was duly ordered, that proper notice of said election was duly given, that proper elect~on officers were duly appointed prior to said election, that said elect~on was duly held, that due returns of the result of said election have been made and delivered, and that the C~ty Council has duly canvassed sa~d returns, all ~n accordance w~th law and the Ordinance calling said election 2 That the City Council officially finds and determines that the following votes were cast at sa~d election on each submitted PROPOSITION, by the resident, qualified electors of said C~ty who voted at the election PROPOSITION NO 825 VOTES FOR ) ) THE ISSUANCE OF $8,215,000 ) OF STREET AND SIDEWALK ) PROVEMENT BONDS 1015 VOTES AGAINST ) PROPOSITION NO 2 1007 VOTES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $3,282,000 OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT BONDS 811 VOTES AGAINST pROPOSITION NO 3 865 VOTES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $218,000 OF PARK BONDS 971 VOTES AGAINST PROPOSITION NO 4 937 VOTES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $900,000 OF UNIVERSITY DRIVE PROVEMENT BONDS 890 VOTES AGAINST PROPOSITION NO 5 795 VOTES FOR ) THE ISSUANCE OF $1,100,000 OF MUNICIPAL BUILDING IM- PROVEMENT BONDS 1051 VOTES AGAINST ) PROPOSITION NO 6 1045 VOTES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $450,000 OF FIRE SUBSTATION BONDS 778 VOTES AGAINST pROPOSITION NO 7 10%8 VOTES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $110,000 OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS BONDS 808 VOTES AGAINST 3 That the Clty Councll offlclally f~nds, determlnes, and declares the result of sa~d elect~on to be that each of the foregolng PROPOSITIONS NOS 2, 4, 6, and 7 so submitted has received a favorable majority vote in all respects and has carried, and that the bonds voted thereunder may be lssued an accordance with law, but that each of the foregoing PROPOSTIONS NOS 1, 3, and 5 failed to carry, and that no bonds shall be issued thereunder CERTIFICATE FOR ORDINANCE CANVASSI~K] ~.~CTION ~S STAT OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTf~ CITY OF D~NTON We, the u~rslgned offlcers of said Clty, hereby certlfy as follows 1 The C~ty Council of sa~d City. convened In SPECIAL ~'~'~G CN THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1982, at the Municipal Bul!dlng (City Hall), and the roll was called of the duly constituted offlcers and members of said City Council, to-w!t Charlotte Allen, City Secretary Richard O Stewart, Mayor Dr A Pay Stephens Mark Ch~ Jack Bar~on Jim R~ddlesperger Charles Hopkins Joe Alford and all~sal~ .~. sons T~e~present, e~cept the following absentees ~ -~,u~;~_~ ~ , thus constltutl/lg a quor~r~ Whereu~, ~g other business, the follcw!ng was transacted at sald Meeting a wrltten O~DINANCE CANVASS~G ~.~CTIO~! RETURNS was duly lntrod~lced for the conslderatlon of sald City Council and duly read It was then duly ~ and seconded that said Ordlnance be passed, and, after due discussion, sald motion, carrying with it the passage of said Ordinance, preval!ed and carried by the following vote AYESAil members of said City Councll sbz~n present above voted "Aye" NOES None 2 T~at a true, full, and correct copy of the aforesaid Ordinance passed at the Meetz~g described in the above and foregoing paragraph is attached to and follows this Certlflcat_=, ~mt ~ld Orclnance has been duly recorded in said City Cou~cl!'s minutes of said Meeting, that the above and foregoing paragraph Is a true, f~l, and correct excerpt frcm sald City Council's m!nutes of said Meeting perta!nlng to the passage of sald Ordinance, that the persons named in the above and foregoing paragraph are the duly chosen, quallfled, and acting offlcers and r~rs of sald City Council as indicated therein, that each of th~ officers and members of said City Council was duly and sufficiently notified offlclally and personally, in advance, of the tlme, place, and purpose of the aforesaid Meetang, and that said Ordinance ~ula be introduced a~d considered for passage at said M~t!ng, and that sald ~ting was open to the public, and public notlce of the time, place, and purpose of sald n~eting was given, all as required by Vernon's Ann Clv St Artlcle 6252-17 3 That t. he Mayor of said Clty has approved, and hereby approves, the aforesaid Ordinance, that the Mayor and tb~ City Secretary of said Clty have duly slg~ed said Ordinance, and that the Mayor and the Clty Secretary of sa!d Clty hereby declare that their signing of this Certlflcate shall constitute the signing of the attached and follcwlng copy of sa~d Orcb_nance for all ~cposes S~AND SEA?.~n the 14th of day 1982 .......... .... l- ....... We, the underszgned, being respectively the C~ty Attorney and the Bo~ Attorneys of the City of Denton, Texas, hereby certify that we prepared and approved as to legall~ the attached and following Ordinance prior to its passage as aforesaid Bond Attorneys