2019-043 Impact Fee Revenue UseDate: March 8, 2019 Report No. 2019-043
INFORMAL STAFF REPORT
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Allowable uses of impact fee revenues.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On January 15, 2019, Council member Hudspeth requested information on the implementation
process for using impact fees to support community-wide improvement projects by district or
other key geographies. Impact fee revenue uses are strictly regulated by chapter 395 of the
Texas Local Government Code (LGC) and use of revenues is specifically tied to a council-
adopted capital improvement plan.
BACKGROUND:
Impact fees are a state-authorized mechanism, among others, to deliver funding for the public
infrastructure components necessitated by new development. These fees are a one-time charge
meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of each new unit of development creating
new infrastructure needs.
While common throughout the United States, the State of Texas allows impact fees to be used
for (LGC 395.001):
1. Water supply, treatment, and distribution facilities;
2. Wastewater collection and treatment facilities;
3. Storm water, drainage, and flood control facilities; and
4. Roadway facilities.
Cities who enact impact fees must first conduct an impact fee study that analyzes land use to
project future growth characteristics within a City’s service area(s) over an ensuing 10-year
period. Using these land use assumptions, a 10-year capital improvements plan is developed and
adopted by the city. Among other contents, the capital improvement plan describes the
infrastructure additions or expansions needed to meet the demands of the projected growth (LGC
395.014) as outlined in the impact fee study. Using the land use assumptions and capital
improvements plan, a fee per service unit of development is determined and adopted by the City.
The land use assumptions and capital improvements plan must be updated no later than every
five years.
The City of Denton collects impact fees for water, wastewater, and street (pavement)
infrastructure costs (see attached capital plans). The City Council recently adopted updated land
use assumptions, a Water and Wastewater capital plan, and service unit fees on January 15,
2019. The roadway impact fee was previously updated and adopted on June 21, 2016.
State law specifically states that an impact fee is “a charge or assessment imposed by a political
subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the
Date: March 8, 2019 Report No. 2019-043
costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new
development.” (LCG 395.001).
State law restricts the use of impact fee revenues to pay the costs of constructing capital
improvements or facility expansions, including and limited to the:
1. Construction contract price;
2. Surveying and engineering fees;
3. Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's fees,
and expert witness fees; and
4. Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or
financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an
employee of the political subdivision (LGC 395.012).
State law states that impact fees may not be adopted or used to pay for:
1. Construction, acquisition, or expansion of public facilities or assets other than capital
improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan;
2. Repair, operation, or maintenance of existing or new capital improvements or facility
expansions;
3. Upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to serve
existing development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or
regulatory standards;
4. Upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to provide
better service to existing development; and
5. Administrative and operating costs of the political subdivision, except the Edwards
Underground Water District or a river authority that is authorized elsewhere by state law
to charge fees that function as impact fees may use impact fees to pay its administrative
and operating costs; and
6. Principal payments and interest or other finance charges on bonds or other indebtedness,
except as otherwise allowed in statute (LGC 395.013)
CONCLUSION:
Due to the restrictions of state law, impact fee revenues may only be used for projects that fall
under the state’s definition of capital improvements or facility expansions and create
infrastructure capacity to service future growth (i.e. a project listed within the 10-year impact fee
capital improvement plan)
As a result of these requirements, the City of Denton does not have the authority to redirect
impact fee revenues towards projects that are not part of a capital improvements plan. To legally
reallocate impact fee revenues from currently planned projects into a separate set of projects,
regardless of location, the city must develop and adopt an updated capital improvement plan(s)
to document that the new projects are necessary to serve anticipated growth.
Date: March 8, 2019 Report No. 2019-043
ATTACHMENT(S):
Water CIP diagram
Wastewater CIP diagram
Roadway (Pavement) CIP diagram
STAFF CONTACT:
Ryan Adams
Assistant to the City Manager
910-349-8565
Ryan.Adams@cityofdenton.com
2018 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study 2.9 September 2018
City of Denton, Texas
Table 2.3. Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements
Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost
Proj. #Description
2018 Required
Capacity
(Percent Utilization)
2028 Required
Capacity
(Percent Utilization)
2018-2028 Required
Capacity
(Percent Utilization)
2028
Projected
Recoverable
Cost
Total Project
Cost
Zone 1A
Utilization
Zone 1A
Recoverable
Cost
Zone 1B
Utilization
Zone 1B
Recoverable
Cost
Zone 2
Utilization
Zone 2
Recoverable
Cost
1 Lake Ray Roberts 90.0%100.0%10%15,330,617$ 153,306,163$ 48%7,358,696$ 47%7,205,390$ 5%766,531$
2 Lake Ray Roberts Water Treatment Plant 60%100%40%22,578,094$ 56,445,235$ 48%10,837,485$ 47%10,611,704$ 5%1,128,905$
3 54" Finished Water Transmission Line 35%60%25%2,397,575$ 9,590,299$ 48%1,150,836$ 47%1,126,860$ 5%119,879$
4 Loop 288 Water Main - Sherman to UNT 35%65%30%1,308,555$ 4,361,849$ 48%628,106$ 47%615,021$ 5%65,428$
5 Loop 288 Water Main - Sherman to Hwy 380 40%65%25%879,588$ 3,518,352$ 48%422,202$ 47%413,406$ 5%43,979$
6 Northwest Elevated Storage Tank 55%75%20%467,998$ 2,339,988$ 0%-$ 100%467,998$ 0%-$
7 Southwest Pump Station 50%75%25%1,478,001$ 5,912,002$ 0%-$ 90%1,330,201$ 10%147,800$
8 Southwest PS Oversize Discharge Line (30" to
36"15%20%5%14,224$ 284,477$ 0%-$ 90%12,802$ 10%1,422$
9 Vintage Oversize Line (12" to 20")50%70%20%50,854$ 254,269$ 0%-$ 80%40,683$ 20%10,171$
10 North-South Water Line Phase I 25%50%25%1,509,651$ 6,038,601$ 48%724,632$ 47%709,536$ 5%75,483$
11 Roselawn Elevated Storage Tank 60%85%25%1,574,860$ 6,299,440$ 48%755,933$ 47%740,184$ 5%78,743$
12 Roselawn Water Line 35%55%20%359,473$ 1,797,363$ 48%172,547$ 47%168,952$ 5%17,974$
13 Masch Branch Road Water Line Extension 15%20%5%32,290$ 645,781$ 0%-$ 100%32,290$ 0%-$
14 US 380 Urban Utility Relocation 25%30%5%68,105$ 1,362,086$ 0%-$ 100%68,105$ 0%-$
15 Rayzor Ranch Oversize Line (16" to 20")20%25%5%6,662$ 133,226$ 0%-$ 100%6,662$ 0%-$
16 Southwest Elevated Storage Tank 55%65%10%541,028$ 5,410,280$ 0%-$ 90%486,925$ 10%54,103$
17 University Water Line and PRV 25%55%30%247,941$ 826,468$ 0%-$ 100%247,941$ 0%-$
1 North-South Water Line 0%30%30%3,261,090$ 10,870,300$ 10%326,109$ 70%2,282,763$ 20%652,218$
2 I-35 Parallel Line Crossing 15%30%15%150,600$ 1,004,000$ 0%-$ 100%150,600$ 0%-$
3 Riney Road Booster Pump Station 15%25%10%786,600$ 7,866,000$ 0%-$ 100%786,600$ 0%-$
4 Elm/Loop 288 Water Lines 0%35%35%1,938,055$ 5,537,300$ 0%-$ 100%1,938,055$ 0%-$
5 Allred Road / John Paine Road Water Lines 0%30%30%1,779,000$ 5,930,000$ 0%-$ 80%1,423,200$ 20%355,800$
6 Ray Roberts WTP Expansion 0%4%4%3,571,200$ 89,280,000$ 48%1,714,176$ 47%1,678,464$ 5%178,560$
7 McKinney Water Line 0%35%35%420,210$ 1,200,600$ 0%-$ 100%420,210$ 0%-$
8 I-35E Frontage Road Water Line Betterment 0%65%65%663,332$ 1,020,510$ 0%-$ 100%663,332$ 0%-$
9 Locust Water Line Upsize 0%90%90%1,153,598$ 1,281,776$ 100%1,153,598$ 0%-$ 0%-$
10 I-35W Water Line 0%30%30%1,955,190$ 6,517,300$ 0%-$ 80%1,564,152$ 20%391,038$
11 I-35W/Corbin Water Line 0%30%30%816,630$ 2,722,100$ 0%-$ 80%653,304$ 20%163,326$
12 Hickory Water Line Upsize 0%90%90%448,600$ 498,444$ 100%448,600$ 0%-$ 0%-$
13 Jim Christal Oversize Line (16" to 20")0%15%15%19,164$ 127,758$ 0%-$ 100%19,164$ 0%-$
14 Jim Christal Water Line / I-35 Crossing 0%15%15%195,375$ 1,302,500$ 0%-$ 100%195,375$ 0%-$
15 Water Impact Fee Report Preparation 0%100%100%45,700$ 45,700$ 40%18,280$ 54%24,678$ 6%2,742$
66,049,859$ 393,730,167$ 25,711,201$ 36,084,557$ 4,254,101$ Total
EXISTING
PROPOSED
2018 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study 3.8 September 2018
City of Denton, Texas
Table 3.3. Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements
Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost
Proj. #Description
2018 Required
Capacity
(Percent Utilization)
2028 Required
Capacity
(Percent Utilization)
2018-2028 Required
Capacity
(Percent Utilization)
2028
Projected
Recoverable
Cost
Total Project
Cost
1 South Wet Weather Lift Station &
Detention Pond 48.4%62.4%14.0%217,406$ 1,552,898$
2 Cooper Creek Interceptor III 47.6%49.5%1.9%24,282$ 1,277,970$
3 Cooper Creek Outfall (Loop 288)64.7%72.3%7.6%296,310$ 3,898,807$
4 Eagle Drive Sewer 18.1%19.4%1.3%11,731$ 902,329$
5 Krum Sewer Line 10.0%51.3%41.3%164,560$ 398,450$
6 Graveyard Branch Interceptor 6.6%18.1%11.5%575,570$ 5,004,952$
7 Hickory Creek Outfall 34.4%38.5%4.1%45,572$ 1,111,495$
8 Leatherwood Interceptor 32.0%33.5%1.5%2,349$ 156,592$
9 Parvin Sewer Line 59.0%71.9%12.9%42,116$ 326,474$
10 Pecan Creek Interceptor (Ph 1 & 2)96.0%100.0%4.0%134,528$ 3,363,189$
11 Pecan Creek Interceptor I 53.4%66.9%13.5%266,716$ 1,975,672$
12 Pecan Creek Interceptor II 40.6%46.0%5.4%100,558$ 1,862,175$
13 Pecan Creek Interceptor III 36.1%41.0%4.9%150,879$ 3,079,149$
14 Pecan Creek Interceptor IV 26.9%32.5%5.6%54,784$ 978,285$
15 Pecan WRP (15MGD)85.0%100.0%15.0%5,929,227$ 39,528,174$
16 Pecan WRP Expansion (6MGD)0.0%70.0%70.0%21,003,588$ 30,005,125$
17 Roark Branch Interceptor 0.0%60.6%60.6%517,994$ 854,774$
18 State School Interceptor I 82.4%91.6%9.2%152,800$ 1,660,869$
19 State School Interceptor II 35.3%46.2%10.9%362,579$ 3,326,406$
20 US 380 Utility Relocations 26.5%30.6%4.1%115,747$ 2,823,082$
21 Woodhaven Interceptor 41.8%44.5%2.7%26,075$ 965,735$
1 Audra Interceptor 75.9%82.0%6.1%16,990$ 278,530$
2 Ave G Interceptor 92.2%99.3%7.1%30,749$ 433,078$
3 Bonnie Brae Connector 0.0%79.4%79.4%152,247$ 191,746$
4 Bonnie Brae Relocation 30.9%89.3%58.4%1,101,486$ 1,886,106$
5 Carroll Ave Interceptor 70.4%73.6%3.2%14,036$ 438,623$
6 Clear Creek Interceptor 0.0%16.0%16.0%2,400,000$ 15,000,000$
7 Cooper Creek Interceptor I 74.2%83.0%8.8%231,616$ 2,632,000$
8 Cooper Creek Interceptor II 54.6%58.3%3.7%41,736$ 1,128,000$
9 Dry Fork Hickory Creek Tributary 1
Interceptor 80.5%84.1%3.6%41,190$ 1,144,159$
10 Elm Street Sewer Replacements 48.7%52.5%3.8%25,752$ 677,674$
11 Hickory Creek Interceptor I 50.2%72.6%22.4%324,240$ 1,447,500$
12 Hickory Creek Interceptor II 46.7%87.2%40.5%3,281,513$ 8,102,500$
13 Hickory Creek Interceptor III 29.1%70.3%41.2%1,184,678$ 2,875,433$
14 Hickory Creek Interceptor IV 29.8%39.1%9.3%117,892$ 1,267,658$
15 Hickory Creek Lift Station Detention
Facility 0.0%96.3%96.3%9,533,700$ 9,900,000$
16 Mulberry Interceptor 44.4%50.7%6.3%7,927$ 125,820$
17 Ranch View Interceptor (Oversize)0.0%56.5%56.5%90,219$ 159,680$
18 West Peak Flow Detention Lift Station
and Pond 0.0%23.1%23.1%877,800$ 3,800,000$
19 Wastewater Impact Fee Report
Preparation 0.0%100.0%100.0%45,700$ 45,700$
49,714,840$ 156,586,808$
EXISTING
PROPOSED
Total
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study March 2016
City of Denton, Texas 10
Table 2.A. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area A
Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length
(mi)
% In
Service
Area
A-1 SA Jim Christal (1) 490' E of C. Wolfe to Thomas J. Egan 0.28 50%
A-2, C-21 SA Jim Christal (2) 225' E of Future Loop to Masch Branch 0.75 50%
A-3, C-22 PA Jim Christal (3) Masch Branch to Scripture 1.23 50%
A-4 PA Jim Christal (4) Scripture to I-35 SBFR 0.60 100%
A-5 PA Airport Masch Branch to I-35W SBFR 1.75 100%
A-6 SA Amyx C. Wolfe to FM 2499 2.60 100%
A-7 SA Shelby Westcourt/Underwood to Corbin 0.61 100%
A-8 SA Cole Ranch E-W SA #1 Cole Ranch N-S SA to Future Loop 0.87 100%
A-9 SA FM 2499 (1) C. Wolfe to 345' E of Cole Ranch-Hunter Ranch Arterial 1.07 100%
A-10 SA FM 2499 (2) 345' E of Cole Ranch-Hunter Ranch Arterial to Underwood 1.27 100%
A-11 SA Cole Ranch E-W SA #2 Cole Ranch N-S SA to Cole Ranch-Hunter Ranch Arterial 1.06 100%
A-12 SA H. Lively (1) 725' E of Seabron to 1,975' W of C. Wolfe 0.74 100%
A-13 SA H. Lively (2) 1,975' W of C. Wolfe to C. Wolfe 0.37 50%
A-14 SA H. Lively (3) C. Wolfe to John Paine/Underwood (2) 2.40 100%
A-15 SA Hunter Ranch Arterial Hunter Ranch N-S Col #1 to Brush Creek 2.22 100%
A-16 PA Brush Creek (1) Hunter Ranch N-S Col #2 to I-35W 2.71 100%
A-17 SA Ed Robson FM 2449 to H. Lively 0.62 100%
A-18 C C. Wolfe Tom Cole to FM 2449 1.58 50%
A-19 SA H. Lively (4) FM 2499 to H. Lively 0.63 50%
A-20 SA Cole Ranch N-S SA Tom Cole to H. Lively 2.39 100%
A-21 PA Cole Ranch-Hunter Ranch Arterial Amyx to Hunter Ranch Arterial 3.43 100%
A-22 PA Future Loop (2) Jim Christal to 4,965' S of Jim Christal 0.94 100%
A-23 PA Future Loop (3) 260' N of Tom Cole to FM 2449 1.78 100%
A-24 PA Future Loop (4) 1,040' W of Amyx to Underwood 0.57 50%
A-25 PA Future Loop (5) Underwood to I-35W SBFR 0.73 100%
A-26 C Jim Christal-Tom Cole Collector Jim Christal to Tom Cole 0.76 100%
A-27 SA (1/2)Westcourt Airport to Springside 0.79 100%
A-28 SA Westcourt/Underwood Springside to 1,700' S of Springside 0.32 100%
A-29 SA Underwood (1) 1,700' S of Springside to 2,655' N of FM 2449 0.29 50%
A-30 SA Underwood (2) 2,655' N of FM 2449 to FM 2449 0.50 100%
A-31 SA John Paine/Underwood (1) FM 2449 to 1,265' N of H. Lively 0.72 50%
A-32 SA John Paine/Underwood (2) 1,265' N of H. Lively to 970' N of Brush Creek 0.62 100%
A-33 SA John Paine/Underwood (3) 970' N of Brush Creek to Brush Creek 0.18 100%
A-34 PA (2/3)Western Jim Christal to Airport 1.23 100%
A-35 C Precision (1) Jim Christal to 1,775' N of Airport 0.42 100%
A-36 C Precision (2) 1,775' N of Airport to Airport 0.34 100%
Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study March 2016
City of Denton, Texas 11
Table 2.B. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area B
Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length
(mi)
% In
Service
Area
B-1 C Parvin Highland Park to McCormick 0.51 100%
B-2 SA Hobson Country Club to Teasley 1.14 100%
B-3 PA Vintage 490' W of Bonnie Brae to Fort Worth (US 377) 0.96 100%
B-4 C El Paseo Country Club to Belmont 0.36 100%
B-5 SA Ryan Country Club to Teasley 2.06 100%
B-6 SA (1/2)Robinson (1) Teasley to 220' E of Wheeler Ridge 0.52 100%
B-7 SA (1/2)Robinson (2) 175' E of Berkley to 315' E of State School Rd 0.13 100%
B-8 C (1/3)Creekdale (1) Ryan to 660' S. of Ryan 0.13 100%
B-9 C Creekdale (2) 660' S. of Ryan to Thistle Way 0.42 100%
B-10 C (1/3)Creekdale (3) Thistle Way to Riverpass 0.12 50%
B-11 C Creekdale (4) 210' E of Riverchase Trail to 280' W of Pimlico 0.60 100%
B-12 PA Brush Creek (2) I-35W NBFR to John Paine (Future) 0.37 100%
B-13 PA Brush Creek (3) John Paine (Future) to 2,010' E of John Paine (Future) 0.38 100%
B-14 PA Brush Creek (4) 225' W. of Fort Worth to 500' E. of Fort Worth 0.14 100%
B-15 PA Brush Creek (5) 500' E. of Fort Worth to 2,180' East of Fort Worth 0.32 50%
B-16 PA Hickory Creek (1) Country Club to 1,955' E. of Country Club 0.37 100%
B-17 PA Hickory Creek (2) Riverpass to Montecito 0.43 50%
B-18 PA Hickory Creek (3) Montecito to Teasley 0.85 100%
B-19 PA (1/3)Hickory Creek (4) Teasley to Nautical 0.25 100%
B-20 PA (2/3)Hickory Creek (5) Nautical to Erin 0.13 100%
B-21 PA Hickory Creek (6) Erin to State School Road (Future) 0.09 100%
B-22 C John Paine-Fort Worth Collector John Paine to Fort Worth (US 377) 0.41 100%
B-23 C John Paine (1) Vintage to Brush Creek 1.41 100%
B-24 C John Paine (2) Brush Creek to Johnson 0.50 50%
B-25 C John Paine (3) Johnson to 135' N of Athens 0.39 100%
B-26 SA Bonnie Brae (4) I-35E SBFR to Vintage 2.45 100%
B-27 SA Bonnie Brae (5) Vintage to Fort Worth (US 377) 1.07 100%
B-28 C Highland Park 130' S of Willowcrest to Roselawn 0.78 100%
B-29 PA Fort Worth (US 377) I-35E to S City Limits 5.13 100%
B-30 SA FM 1830 Fort Worth (US 377) to Brush Creek 2.14 100%
B-31 C Ryan-Creekdale Collector Ryan to Creekdale 0.48 100%
B-32 PA Teasley Sundown to S City Limits 3.39 100%
Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study March 2016
City of Denton, Texas 12
Table 2.C. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area C
Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length
(mi)
% In
Service
Area
C-1 SA Milam (1) I-35 SBFR to 175' E of I-35 NBFR 0.09 100%
C-2 SA Milam (2) 175' E of I-35 NBFR to FM 2164 (Locust) 2.28 50%
C-3 C Bobcat 1,105' W of Milam Ridge to HOD N-S Secondary Arterial 0.41 100%
C-4 PA Ganzer 230' W. of Rector to Future Cindy 0.63 50%
C-5 PA Ganzer/Long (1) 625' W of I-35 SBFR to 350' E of I-35 NBFR 0.22 100%
C-6 SA Ganzer/Long (2) Ganzer to FM 2164 (Locust) 2.15 100%
C-7 C Barthold-Cindy Collector Barthold to 1,135' W of Cindy (Future) 0.21 100%
C-8 C Masch Branch-I-35 Collector 1,295' W of I-35 to I-35 0.25 100%
C-9 SA HOD E-W Secondary Arterial (1) HOD N-S Secondary Arterial to 840' E of HOD N-S 0.16 100%
C-10 SA HOD E-W Secondary Arterial (2) 840' E of HOD N-S Secondary Arterial to 130' E of Bonnie 0.44 50%
C-11 SA HOD E-W Secondary Arterial (3) 130' E of Bonnie Brae (Existing) to FM 2164 (Locust) 2.86 100%
C-12 PA HWY 1173 (1) 460' E of Masch Branch (Existing) to 375' E of Barthold 0.52 50%
C-13 PA HWY 1173 (2) Cindy to I-35 SBFR 0.60 100%
C-14 PA (1/3)Elm (US 377) I-35 NBFR to Elm/Locust Couplet 3.01 100%
C-15 C Hercules 115' E of Northpointe to Locust 0.41 100%
C-16 SA Westgate (E-W) Westgate (N-S) to Bonnie Brae 0.56 100%
C-17 C Riney (1) Bonnie Brae to 990' W of Elm 0.34 100%
C-18 C Riney (2) 990' W of Elm to Elm 0.19 100%
C-19 SA Masch Branch-I-35 Secondary Arterial Masch Branch to I-35 SBFR 1.34 100%
C-20 SA Jim Christal (1) 490' E of C. Wolfe to Thomas J. Egan 0.79 50%
A-2, C-21 SA Jim Christal (2) 225' E of Future Loop to Masch Branch 0.75 50%
A-3, C-22 PA Jim Christal (3) Masch Branch to Scripture 1.23 50%
C-23 SA Nail (1) University to 2,240' S of University 0.42 50%
C-24 SA Nail (2) 2,240 S of University to Jim Christal 0.47 100%
C-25 C Thomas J Egan (1) 555' N. of University to 550' S of University 0.21 100%
C-26 C Thomas J Egan (2) 550' S of University to Jim Christal 0.66 50%
C-27 PA Future Loop (1) University to 745' N of Jim Christal 0.56 100%
C-28 PA Masch Branch (1) 1,290' S of HWY 1173 to Miller 0.79 50%
C-29 PA Masch Branch (2) 895' W of Future Loop to 1,255' N of University 0.59 100%
C-30 PA Masch Branch (3) 1,255' N of University to Jim Christal 1.02 100%
C-31 SA Lover's Lane (1) HWY 1173 to 325' N of Fruth 0.27 50%
C-32 SA Lover's Lane (2) 325' N of Fruth to 340' N of Littlebrook 0.17 100%
C-33 SA Lover's Lane (3) 340' N of Littlebrook to Hook 0.10 50%
C-34 SA Lover's Lane (4) Hook to Masch Branch-I-35 SA 0.71 100%
C-35 SA Barthold Ganzer to City Limits 0.58 50%
C-36 SA Cindy (1) Ganzer to 1,280' S of Ganzer 0.24 50%
C-37 SA Cindy (2) 1,280' S of Ganzer to Masch Branch-I-35 Collector 0.41 100%
C-38 SA Cindy (3) FM 1173 (Future) to 150' S of Future Loop 0.42 100%
C-39 SA Cindy (4) 1,050' N of Masch Branch-I-35 PA to Tieszen 0.82 100%
C-40 SA Cindy (5) Tieszen to University 0.36 100%
C-41 PA (2/3)Western (1) University to Jim Christal 0.80 100%
C-42 C Milam-Bobcat Col Milam to Bobcat (Future) 0.57 100%
C-43 SA HOD N-S Secondary Arterial (1) Milam to 220' S of Bobcat 0.58 100%
C-44 SA HOD N-S Secondary Arterial (2) 2830' N of Elm to Elm 0.54 100%
C-45 SA Heritage Trail University to Scripture 0.77 100%
C-46 PA Bonnie Brae (1) Milam to Loop 288 EBFR 3.17 100%
C-47 SA Bonnie Brae (2) Loop 288 EBFR to 860' N of Riney 0.43 100%
C-48,E-14 SA Bonnie Brae (3) University to I-35 1.41 50%
C-49 C Fallmeadow 140' S of Meadow Edge to Gardenview 0.19 100%
C-50,D-45 PA FM 2164 (Locust) (1) City Limits to Loop 288 WBFR 2.70 50%
C-51,D-46 PA FM 2164 (Locust) (2) Loop 288 WBFR to Elm 1.41 50%
Notes: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order; HOD: Hills of Denton.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study March 2016
City of Denton, Texas 13
Table 2.D. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area D
Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length
(mi)
% In
Service
Area
D-1 C FM 2164-Brittany Hill Collector (1) 1,605' E of FM 2164 to 745' W of Mesquite Ridge 0.57 100%
D-2 C FM 2164-Brittany Hill Collector (2) 745' W of Mesquite Ridge to Mesquite Ridge 0.14 50%
D-3 C FM 2164-Brittany Hill Collector (3) Mesquite Ridge to Brittany Hill 0.49 100%
D-4 SA FM 2153 (Realigned) City Limits to 620' S of Somerset 2.03 100%
D-5 PA FM 2164-FM 2153 (Realigned) PA FM 2164 (Locust) to Indian Wells (Future) 0.73 100%
D-6 PA FM 2164-FM 2153 (Realigned) PA Mesquite Ridge (Future) to FM 2153 (Realigned) 1.79 100%
D-7 SA FM 2164-FM 2153 SA (1) FM 2164 (Locust) to Indian Wells (Future) 0.93 100%
D-8 SA FM 2164-FM 2153 SA (2) 540' E of Green Valley (Future) to FM 2153 0.90 100%
D-9 SA Shepard 1,490' W of FM 2153 to FM 2153 0.28 100%
D-10 C Gribble Springs-Chapman Collector 630' N of FM 2164-Brittany Hill Collector to Gribble Springs 1.69 100%
D-11 C Mesquite Ridge (1) FM 2164-Brittany Hill Collector to
400 N' of FM 2164-FM 2153 (Realigned) PA 0.52 100%
D-12 C Mesquite Ridge (2) 400' N of FM 2164-FM 2153 (Realigned) PA to
470' S of FM 2164-FM 2153 (Realigned) PA 0.16 50%
D-13 C Mesquite Ridge (3) 470' S of FM 2164-FM 2153 (Realigned) PA to
1,005' S of FM 2164-FM 2153 (Realigned) PA 0.10 100%
D-14 SA Brittany Hill (1) 355' S of Covey to
795' S of FM 2164-FM 2153 (Realigned) PA 0.78 100%
D-15 SA Brittany Hill (2) 795' S of FM 2164-FM 2153 (Realigned) PA to
770' N of FM 2164-FM 2153 SA 0.20 50%
D-16 C FM 2153 (1) City Limits to Burger (S) 1.44 100%
D-17 C FM 2153 (2) Burger to FM 2153 (Realigned) 0.27 100%
D-18 C FM 2153 (Realigned)-FM 2153 Collector FM 2153 (Realigned) to FM 2153 0.79 100%
D-19 SA FM 2153 (3) 620' S of Somerset to Sherman 1.14 50%
D-20 SA Green Valley (1) Warschun to 860' S of Warschun 0.16 100%
D-21 SA Green Valley (2) 860' S of Warschun to Sherman 0.23 100%
D-22 SA Milam (3) FM 2164 (Locust) to 605' E of FM 2164 (Locust) 0.11 100%
D-23 SA Bobcat (3) FM 2164 (Locust) to 515' E of FM 2164 (Locust) 0.09 100%
D-24 SA Cooper Creek (1) 860' W of Hartlee-Cooper Collector #1 to Hartlee Field 2.13 100%
D-25 SA Cooper Creek (2) Silver Dome to Fishtrap 0.66 50%
D-26 SA Cooper Creek (3) Fishtrap to University 0.50 100%
D-27 C Golden Circle Hartlee Field (Future) to Hartlee Field (Existing) 1.78 100%
D-28 SA Hartlee Field (1) FM 2164 (Locust) to 500' E of FM 2164 (Locust) 0.09 100%
D-29 SA Hartlee Field (2) West City Limits to Woodland Hill 1.10 100%
D-30 C Long (1) FM 2164 (Locust) to 525' E of FM 2164 0.10 100%
D-31 C Long (2) City Limits to Stuart 0.34 100%
D-32 C Hartlee Field (3) Sherman to 515' E. of Sherman 0.43 100%
D-33 C Kings-Windsor Collector Kings Row to Windsor 0.09 100%
D-34 C Windsor 410' E of Saints to Cooper Creek 1.02 100%
D-35 SA Mingo (2) University to 455' E. of Cooper Creek 0.95 100%
D-36 PA Post Oak (1) N. City Limits to Cooper Creek (Future) 0.86 100%
D-37 PA Post Oak/Cooper Creek Cooper Creek (Future) to Hartlee Field 0.40 100%
D-38 PA Post Oak (2) Railroad to Fishtrap 0.33 100%
D-39 PA Post Oak (3) Fishtrap to 940' S of Fishtrap 0.18 50%
D-40 PA Post Oak (4) 940' S of Fishtrap to University 0.07 100%
D-41 C Deerwood 2,855' N of Kings Row to 680' N of Kings Row 0.41 100%
D-42 C Hartlee-Cooper Col Hartlee Field to Cooper Creek 0.82 100%
D-43 PA Sherman (1) Locust to Loop 288 WBFR 2.30 100%
D-44 PA Sherman (2) Loop 288 WBFR to City Limits 4.65 100%
C-50,D-45 PA FM 2164 (Locust) (1) City Limits to Loop 288 WBFR 2.70 50%
C-51,D-46 PA FM 2164 (Locust) (2) Loop 288 WBFR to Elm 1.41 50%
Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study March 2016
City of Denton, Texas 14
Table 2.E. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area E
Proj. #IF Class Roadway Limits Length
(mi)
% In
Service
Area
E-1 SA Mingo (1) 435' NE of Bell to University 2.06 100%
E-2 C Lattimore Ruddell to 475' E of Ruddell 0.09 100%
E-3 C Audra Bayfield to Loop 288 0.27 100%
E-4 C Blagg Mayhill to Lakeview 1.28 100%
E-5 SA McKinney (FM 426) Woodrow to East City Limits 3.95 100%
E-6 C Duchess (1) Woodrow to 115' W of Trailhead 0.75 100%
E-7 C (1/2)Duchess (2) 115' W of Trailhead to 1,000' W of Loop 288 0.38 100%
E-8 C Morse (1) Woodrow to Shady Oaks 0.25 100%
E-9 SA (1/2)Morse (2) Kimberly to Mayhill 0.51 100%
E-10 SA Spencer 485' E of Loop 288 to Mayhill 0.34 100%
E-11 C Lakeview (1) Post Oak (Future) to 1025' E of Post Oak (Future) 0.19 100%
E-12 C Lakeview (2) 2,745' E of Post Oak (Future) to Bishop Pine 0.36 100%
E-13 C Edwards 560' E of Mayhill to Swisher 1.02 100%
C-48,E-14 SA Bonnie Brae (3) University to I-35E NBFR 1.41 50%
E-15 C Ruddell Mingo to Willis 0.11 100%
E-16 C Mockingbird McKinney to 850' S of McKinney 0.16 100%
E-17 SA Brinker Shady Oaks to Spencer 0.53 100%
E-18 SA Mayhill (1) University to Colorado 3.81 100%
E-19 PA (1/3)Mayhill (2) Colorado to I-35E NBFR 0.45 100%
E-20 PA Post Oak (5) University to 1,010' N of Blagg 0.33 100%
E-21 PA Post Oak (6) 1,010' N of Blagg to 1,650' S of Blagg 0.50 50%
E-22 PA Post Oak (7) 1,490' N of Mills to 2,400' N of McKinney 0.79 100%
E-23 PA Post Oak (8) 1,230' N of McKinney to Pockrus Page 2.48 100%
E-24 PA Post Oak (9) Pockrus Page to Lakeview 0.27 100%
E-25 C Lakeview (3) 130' S of Rodeo to 735' S of Mills 0.37 100%
E-26 C Trinity-McKinney Connector (1) Trinity to 1290' N of McKinney 1.27 100%
E-27 SA Trinity-McKinney Connector (2) 1290' N of McKinney to McKinney 0.24 100%
Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
A-6
A-9
A-8
A-7
A-6
A-5
A-4A-3A-2A-1
B-1
B-3
B-25
B-15
E-14C-48
B-26
B-28
C-22
C-21C-20
A-32
A-25
A-21
A-21
A-20
A-20
A-15
A-16
A-14
A-10
A-36
A-35A-34
A-33
A-31
A-24
A-30
A-29
A-28
A-27
A-26
A-23
A-22
A-21
A-21
A-20
A-19
A-18
A-17
A-16
A-15
A-14
A-13A-12 A-11
A-10
B-29
B-26
B-23
B-12
B-30
B-29
B-27
B-24
B-22
B-14
B-13
Fort WorthJohn PaineFM 2449
Brush Creek
H. Lively
FM 1830Willowwood
Oak
Parvin
Vintage
Eagle
A irp o rtJim Christal
C WolfeCrawford
H u n te r R a n c hPrecisionRoselawnBonnie BraeAmyx
Robson Ranch CorbinHickory
Cole E-W SA #2 UnderwoodFlorence-Ed Robson
Tom Cole
ShelbyDakotaFlorenceCol
e Hunt
er North TexasHighlandWestern
WestcourtFut
ure LoopHi
ghl
and Par
kCole N-S SASeabronScripture
J Christal-T Cole COLPanhandle
Ed Robson
Country ClubBernardJohn Paine/UnderwoodCole N-S SAH. Lively
Brush CreekFuture LoopFort WorthAirport
FM 2449
H. LivelyJohn PaineFM 2449
Jim Christal
Future Loop
§¨¦I-35W
C
ole - H
u
nterNail Maple
Springside Heritage TrailEctorMcCormickFultonBrush CreekWillowwood
A
Legend
Railroads
Project Limits
CIP Projects
Other Thoroughfares
Streets
Streams
Flood Plain
Non-Annexation Areas
ETJ
I
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study
March 2016
Exhibit 3.A - Service Area A CIP
0 10.5 Miles
See Table 2.A, Page 10
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
A-7
A-6
A-5
E-7 E-9
E-8
E-6
E-5
B-9
B-8
B-1
B-3
B-2
B-4
B-5
B-7B-6
B-25
B-15
E-18
B-26
B-28
A-32
A-25
A-21
A-14
A-10
A-36
A-34
A-33
A-31
A-24
A-30
A-29
A-28
A-27A-23
A-21
A-21
A-16
A-15
A-10
E-24
E-23
E-19
E-17
E-13
E-11
E-10
B-29
B-26
B-23
B-12
B-10
B-20
B-21
B-32
B-16
B-31
B-30
B-29
B-27
B-24
B-22
B-19B-18
B-17
B-14
B-11
B-13
Dallas
Fort WorthJohn PaineWoodrowMontecito
Brush Creek TeasleyHickory Creek LakeviewFM 1830Willowwood
Ryan
Parvin
Vintage
Eagle
SwisherA ir p o rtPost OakCrawford
Hobson
H u n te r R a n chBrinkerEl Paseo
EdwardsPrecisionLOOP 288Robinson
RoselawnBonnie BraeColorado
Hickory Hill
Windriver
Medpark
Pockrus PageCorbinSpencerUnderwoodShelbyDakotaMorse
Highland
WestcourtHi
ghl
and Pa
r
kFM 2449Future LoopCountry ClubBernardFort WorthTeasley
John PaineBrush Creek
FM 1830Airport
MontecitoFuture Loop
§¨¦I-35E
§¨¦I-35W
B
Legend
CIP Projects
Other Thoroughfares
Project Limits
Streets
Railroads
Streams
Flood Plain
Non-Annexation Areas
ETJ
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study
March 2016
Exhibit 3.B - Service Area B CIP
0 10.5 Miles
I
See Table 2.B, Page 11
!(C-6
!(C-9
!(C-8
!(C-7
!(C-4 !(C-5
!(C-3
!(C-6
!(C-2!(C-1
!(A-4!(A-3!(A-2!(A-1
!(E-2
!(E-1
!(E-14!(C-48
!(C-11
!(C-51
!(C-50
!(C-49
!(C-47!(C-14
!(C-14
!(C-46
!(C-46
!(C-46
!(C-45
!(C-44
!(C-43
!(C-11
!(C-42
!(C-37!(C-35
!(C-41
!(C-40
!(C-39
!(C-38
!(C-36
!(C-34
!(C-33
!(C-32
!(C-31
!(C-30
!(C-29
!(C-28
!(C-27!(C-26
!(C-25
!(C-24
!(C-23
!(C-22!(C-21!(C-20
!(C-21
!(C-20
!(C-19 !(C-18!(C-17
!(C-16
!(C-15
!(C-13!(C-12 !(C-10
!(D-45
!(D-30
!(D-28
!(D-23
!(D-22
!(D-46
!(D-43
!(D-31
!(D-29
!(D-27
!(A-35!(A-34!(A-26!(A-22
!(E-15
Elm
W i n d s o rBarthold
CarrollMcKinney
Milam
University
Bobcat
WoodrowGanzer/Long
NailOakCindy
Eagle
Ganzer
FallmeadowShermanJim Christal Mil
am-Bobcat Col
Bo
n
nie
B
r
a
e
HOD E-W SA
LocustLong
Heritage TrailHOD N-S SARiney
M in g oHinkleBellHerculesRector
RuddellHickoryMasch BranchNicosiaEmerson
Morse
Masch Branch-I-35 Col
Lovers LaneHWY 1173
North TexasFultonHighland StuartWesternCoronado
Future LoopGlenwoodT
h
o
ma
s J
E
g
a
n MaloneCrescent
Scripture
J Christal-T Cole COLEctorWindsor Bonnie BraeWindsor
Bobcat
BellRuddell§¨¦288
§¨¦I-35
M a s c h B r a n c h -I-3 5 S A
PrecisionPaisley
Maple
Panhandle
GreenwoodFM 2164Lattimore
Sunset
Kings Row
WoodrowJim Christal C
Legend
Railroads
Project Limits
CIP Projects
Other Thoroughfares
Streams
Flood Plain
Non-Annexation Areas
ETJ
I2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study
March 2016
Exhibit 3.C - Service Area C CIP
0 10.5 Miles
See Table 2.C, Page 12
!(D-3!(D-2
!(D-9
!(D-8!(D-7
!(D-6
!(D-5
!(D-4
!(D-1
!(E-7
!(E-4
!(E-5
!(E-9!(E-6
!(E-5
!(E-3
!(E-2
!(E-1
!(D-40!(D-39
!(D-36
!(C-51
!(C-50
!(C-49
!(C-14
!(C-11
!(C-15
!(D-26
!(D-37
!(D-24
!(D-14
!(D-13!(D-12
!(D-45
!(D-30
!(D-28
!(D-23
!(D-22
!(D-46
!(D-44
!(D-43
!(D-42
!(D-41
!(D-38
!(D-35
!(D-34
!(D-33
!(D-32
!(D-31
!(D-29
!(D-27
!(D-25
!(D-24
!(D-21
!(D-20
!(D-19
!(D-18
!(D-17
!(D-16
!(D-15
!(D-11!(D-10
!(E-25
!(E-26
!(E-22
!(E-21
!(E-20
!(E-18
!(E-16
!(E-15
W i n d s o r
McKinneyCarroll ShermanFM 2153
LOOP 288MockingbirdWoodrowMilam FM 2164CollinsFallmeadowOld NorthMills
Blagg
HOD E-W SA
M ing oShepard
Eagle LocustLong
MayhillLaneyPost OakHercules
Gribble Springs
BellLattimoreRuddellEmerson
Cooper Creek
MorseG Springs-Chapman ColFultonLakeviewStuartHartlee Field
Coronado
GlenwoodGolden Circle
Kings Row
NottinghamWindsor
Hartlee Field
ShermanBellMcKinney FM 2153Cooper Creek§¨¦288 Brittany HillMesquite RidgeM ing oFM 2164-FM 2153 SA
Post OakHinkleBobcat FM 2164-FM 2153 PAFM 2153 (Realigned)Green ValleyPaisley
Deerwood
FM 2164-Brittany Col
S h a d y O a k s
Greenwood Hartley-Cooper ColOak
Sunset
Crescent
Hickory
Panhandle
WoodrowMockingbirdOld NorthRuddellD
Legend
Project Limits
CIP Projects
Railroads
Other Thoroughfares
Streets
Flood Plain
Streams
Non-Annexation Areas
ETJ
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study
March 2016
I
Exhibit 3.D - Service Area D CIP
0 10.5 Miles1 in = 1 miles
See Table 2.D, Page 13
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
E-7
E-4
E-5
E-9
E-8
E-6
E-5
E-3
E-2
E-1
B-9
B-8
B-1
B-3
B-2
B-4
B-5
B-7B-6
D-40
D-39
E-18
E-14C-48
B-26
B-28
C-45
C-21
D-26D-35
E-27
E-25
E-26
E-24
E-23
E-22
E-21
E-20
E-19
E-18
E-17
E-16
E-15
E-13
E-12E-11
E-10
B-26
B-10
B-21
B-32
B-16
B-31
B-30
B-29
B-27
B-19B-18B-14
B-11 WoodrowDallas
McKinneyCarroll
LOOP 288University
MockingbirdTeasleyLakeviewFM 1830Willowwood
Ryan
Oak
Parvin
Vintage
Eagle
SwisherA irp o rtMills
Blagg
Post OakM ingo
Hobson
Fort WorthBrinkerHeritage TrailEl Paseo
EdwardsMayhillOld NorthRobinson
RoselawnBonnie BraeHinkleColorado
Windriver
MedparkBell
Pockrus Page
LattimoreRuddell
Spencer
Hickory
Paisley
MontecitoEmerson
S h a d y O a k sNorth TexasMorse
Highland FultonCoronado
Hi
ghl
and Par
kGlenwoodMaloneCrescent
Scripture EctorBernardPost OakRuddellFort WorthLakeviewM in g oMcKinney
TeasleyBell§¨¦I-35E
E
Legend
CIP Projects
Other Thoroughfares
Project Limits
Streets
Railroad
Streams
Flood Plain
Non-Annexation Areas
ETJ
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study
March 2016
Exhibit 3.E - Service Area E CIP
0 10.5 Miles
I
See Table 2.E, Page 14