2016-085ORDINANCE NO, 2016-085
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS APPROVING THE
LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
UNDER WHICH ROADWAY IMPACT FEES MAY BE IMPOSED FOR
DESIGNATED SERVICE AREAS; SETTING A DATE, TIME, AND PLACE
FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF ROADWAY
IMPACT FEES; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY
TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING; AND PROVIDING
CONSTRUCTION AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES.
WHEREAS, Chapter 395, Tex. Loc. Gov't Code, provides the requirements and
procedures for adoption of land use assumptions, capital improvements plans, and impact fees;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Denton has appointed a Capital Improvements Advisory
Committee (CIAC) to advise the City Council concerning land use assumptions, capital
improvement plans, and roadway impact fees pursuant to Sec. 395.058, Tex. Loc. Gov't Code;
and
WHEREAS, the City retained Kimley-Horn and Associates ("Kimley-Horn") to prepare
a Capital Improvements Plan to identify capital improvements or facility expansions for which
Roadway Impact Fees may be assessed, which said plan is attached as Exhibit A hereto and
incorporated by reference herein ("CIP"); and
WHEREAS, Kimley-Horn, on behalf of the City, likewise prepared Land Use
Assumptions reflecting a description of five service areas and projections of changes in land
uses, densities, intensities, and population in each service area over a 10-year period, which said
assessment is attached as Exhibit B hereto and incorporated by reference herein ("LUA"); and
WHEREAS, the City has made a copy of the proposed land use assumptions, the time
period of the projections, and a description of the capital improvement facilities available to the
public by keeping a copy of the LUA and CIP in the City Secretary's office and posting a copy
on the City Website on February 17, 2016, in conformance with Sec. 395.043, Tex. Loc. Gov't
Code; and
WHEREAS, the CIAC submitted its written comments on the proposed LUA and CIP to
City Council on or about March 14, 2016; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing in front of City Council on the LUA and CIP relating to the
adoption of Roadway Impact Fees was conducted on March 22, 2016 and was published in
accordance with Sec. 395.044 of Tex. Loc. Gov't Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the LUA and CIP for Roadway Impact
Fees; and after public hearing on this matter, the City Council finds that adoption of the LUA
and CIP are in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Denton; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to consider the adoption of Roadway Impact Fees at an
additional public hearing as required by Sec. 395.047, Tex. Loc. Gov't Code, and hereby sets
such public hearing as stated herein; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. The recitals and findings set forth above are true and correct and are
incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2. The City hereby adopts the Kimley-Horn LUA and CIP attached as
Exhibits A and B hereto and approves said LUA and CIP in relation to the possible adoption of
Roadway Impact Fees.
SECTION 3. Chapter 395, Tex. Loc. Gov't Code, supplements this Ordinance to the
extent that its provisions may be applicable hereto and, to such extent, its provisions are
incorporated herein. The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall not be construed in a
manner to conflict with Chapter 395, as amended, and if any term or provisions of this Ordinance
shall appear to conflict with any term, provision or condition of Chapter 395 such Ordinance
term or provisions shall be read, interpreted and construed in a manner consistent with and not in
conflict with Chapter 395.
SECTION 4. On April 26, 2016, at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at City
Hall located at 215 E. McKinney St., Denton, Texas, the City Council of the City of Denton,
Texas will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear, be heard, and
present evidence for or against the adoption of Roadway Impact Fees.
SECTION 5. The City Secretary of the City of Denton, Texas, is hereby authorized and
directed to cause notice of such public hearings to be published once in the Denton Record
Chronicle before the 30th day before the public hearing. Pursuant to Sec. 395.049, Tex. Loc.
Gov't Code, statutory notice must contain time, date, and location, along with a heading that
reads:
"NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON ADOPTION OF IMPACT FEES"
The statutory notice must also contain a statement of purpose as follows:
"THE PURPOSE OF THIS HEARING IS TO CONISDER THE ADOPTION OF
ROADWAY IMPACT FEES. THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPOSED IMPACT
FEE PER SERVICE UNIT IS $ . ANY MEMBER OF THE
PUBLIC HAS THE RIGHT TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING AND PRESENT
EVIDENCE FOR OR AGAINST THE PLAN AND PROPOSED FEE."
SECTION 6. If any provision of this ordinance or the application of any provisions to
any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provisions or
application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 22ND day of March, 2016.
(
� �
W.... . " '� �
� w.. �
..�. � __� ..� ., . � ........:......._����......�eem�.��e........� �
CHRI���"1"':["`�, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
.Fl�M �P ���.
BY: .. � :�"�"1�,��tiM�� -� � �,� ����
,�
�i���I�� i�=;I.� AS "��"C� LEGAL FORM:
JENNIFER W. DECURTIS, DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
�� �
BY: � � `�� V�d�..�'.� �1��, .��'��,�;°a , � � �ra I, � ,� r � wx
�$ /, � :�
�m, .�
Exhibit A
Impact Fee Service Area Map
�w�����
������ �����
�VI �
�
,, �
I `�i'%�% �
�::
Y�Acriv� raub�;x�Uu'a�u� � u�� s
���° �
� �[�e�ar��dP�h�Rrom��sa�
� O��davs;Ilibb�A�rBaau�a4
.,.,...M_.... ��'Nt£.I' Y�'�"iQB�Q�n�§""b
...,,�p..,..._ #���Sdd'P�'76`
�'M I I"��N �ql.'�;i 4%
� �
Exhibit B
�� � �� ������ �°'"��
II. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
kYl ` I
� �° ., .���� �o�,.,i � ... ...: ,.
A. Purpose and Overview
In order to assess an impact fee, Land Use Assumptions must be developed to provide the
basis for population and employment growth projections within a political subdivision. As
defined by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, these assumptions include a
description of changes in land uses, densities, and population in the service area. The land
use assumptions are then used in determining the need and timing of transportation
improvements to serve future development.
Information from the following sources was compiled to complete the land use assumptions:
• Denton Plan 2030 (City of Denton Comprehensive Plan)
• Denton County Appraisal District (DCAD)
• North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG)
• City of Denton staff
The Land Use Assumptions include the following components:
• Land Use Assumptions Methodology — An overview of the general methodology used
to generate the land use assumptions.
� Roadway Impacf Fee Service Areas — Explanation of the division of Denton into service
areas for transportation facilities.
• Residential and Employment— Data on residential and employment growth within the
service area over the next ten years (2015 — 2025).
• Land Use Assumptions Summary — A synopsis of the land use assumptions.
The population and employment estimates and projections were compiled in accordance with
the following categories:
Units: Number of dwelling units, both single and multi-family.
Population: Number of people, based on persons per dwelling unit.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study 3 January 2016
City of Denton, Texas
�,�
� ����i � � �`�"�' �'���' ¢ �; v«
� , ��
��.
. ���, �„��I.��� � ���
Employment: Square feet of building area based on three (3) different classifications. Each
classification has unique trip making characteristics.
Retail: Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods which
primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented toward the
household sector, such as grocery stores and restaurants.
Service: Land use activities which provide personal and professional services,
such as government and other professional offices.
Basic: Lpnd use activities that produce goods and services such as those which
are exported outside of the local economy, such as manufacturing,
construction, transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other
industrial uses.
The above categories in the Land Use Assumptions match those used to develop the travel
demand model for the City of Denton. These broader categories are used in the
development of the assumptions for impact fees; however, expanded classifications used in
the assessment of impact fees are found in the Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table
(Pg. 46).
B. Land Use Assumptions Methodology
The residential and non-residential growth projections formulated in this report were
performed using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles. The following
factors were considered in developing these projections:
• Character, type, density, and quantity of existing development;
• Current zoning plans;
• Future Land Use Plan (based on Denton Plan 2030);
� Growth trends;
• Location of vacant land;
• Physical restrictions (i.e. flood plains, railroads); and
• Physical development capacity of Denton.
2015 Roadway Impacr Fee Svudy 4 January 2016
Ci4y of Den4an, Texas
�a
� ����� ��� ��'� y ����
��� �e�
� �� ` �
�� 1
����
�
Existing residential and employment estimates were obtained using Denton Central Appraisal
District (DCAD) parcel data and an aerial survey of existing development. Building data
from the Texas Higher Education Coordination Board were also obtained to accurately
reflect existing development within The University of North Texas and Texas Women's
University campuses, as these are tax-exempt institutions for which no information was
available in the DCAD parcel data.
For the remaining undeveloped areas, assumptions based upon the City's Future Land Use
Plan were used to estimate the ultimate buildout of residential and employment development.
To project future development in the ten year window, the known developing areas within the
city were assumed to be fully developed by the year 2025.
Research of historical building permits was performed to compare the projected growth of
these known developments with previous growth trends in the City of Denton over the last ten
years. During the last ten years, approximately 9,516 residential units and 1 2 million square
feet of employment were developed. It is projected that the next ten years of development
would be reasonably close to these estimates.
C. Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas
The geographic boundary of the proposed impact fee service areas for transportation
facilities is shown in Exhibit 1. The City of Denton is currently divided into five (5) service
areas, each based upon the six (6) mile limit, as required in Chapter 395 (explained on
Pg. 20). For roadway facilities, the service areas as required by state law are limited to
areas within the current corporate limits. Therefore, areas within the extraterritorial
jurisdiction (ETJ) and non-annexation areas (NAAs) are excluded from this study.
It should be noted that at locations where service area boundaries follow a City thoroughfare
facility, the proposed boundary is intended to follow the centerline of the roadway, unless
otherwise noted. In cases where a service area boundary follows the City Limits, only those
portions of the transportation facility within the City Limits are included in the service area.
�.._. ._�...m....... .� � �w��
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study 5 January 2016
City of Denton, Texas
� �� � ��� ��
% I v
/ � �
,.
�,,
D. Residential and Employment
Residential and Employment estimates for the base year (2015) were performed based upon
a survey of the existing land uses on DCAD parcel data, aerial verification, and college
campus building data. Build-out projections were prepared by combining the existing land
uses within the service area with reasonable density assumptions for undeveloped land based
upon the Denton Plan 2030 - Future Land Use Plan. Ten year growth projections were
prepared based upon historic growth trends, location of recent and known development
within the City, and consultation with City staff. Exhibit 2 presents the existing City limits and
the proposed service areas, combined with the Future Land Use Plan.
E. Land Use Assumptions Summary
Table 1 summarizes the residential and employment 10-year growth projections. The
projected growth over the next ten years is reasonable compared to the historical growth
over the previous ten years, as described in the Land Use Assumptions Methodology
(page 4).
Table 1. Residenfial and Employment 10-Year Projections
Residential Employment
Single
Service Fami�y Multi-Family Basic Service Retail
Area�..�..w w�� �w.. � _..�.ww ....� __ ._ _. �
�������� i.&'���t�..... � ��: �,�,� � _.���,�, �fA ��, ��.
A 3,713 1,890 3,685,975 960,894 681,432
� B 909 21 1 618 915 32 021 .. ...4.1..9�
_�www �.. ._��..... .
, , ,263
...... .. . . w...ww .............. � ww............� .w�.�.._ ...._._. .��� �
C 1,033 832 680,537 1,222,722 2,530,669
�_� ...................�..........����������.��������������������.� ..�. � 8.�................. w����..........8.�.��.8..�.4 ........�...��
193,124 466,617
.�............ E .mm....... _..........._......_....._ ....................._..�....mm__.�.____.�..�..___�_��._ w
390 1,099 732,932 1,014,708 897,984
Sub-Total 6,748 4,219 6,569,173 3,423,469 4,995,965
Total 10,966 14,988,607
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study 7 January 2016
City of DenTOn, Texas
Exhibit 3
� �.�� �� � ��� ��m� ���"�'� � °�°� �
� ���� °"��� :� ��� �� � ����
III. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
Development of a 10-year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan is required per
Chapter 395 of the Texas local Government Code. To accomplish this, the current Denton
Mobility Plan has been updated using a Denton-specific Travel Demand Model. The Travel
Demand Model was developed using the existing roadway network and residential and
employment data to develop a baseline scenario. This scenario was calibrated using existing
vehicle counts. Several build-out scenarios were run using the build-out residential and
employment data to assist in completing the updated mobility plan map. This updated
mobility plan map serves as the basis for this Roadway Impact Fee CIP. The Roadway
Impact Fee CIP includes arterial and collector class roadway facilities that serve the overall
transportation system, as well as major intersection improvements. All of the facilities
identified are included in the proposed mobility plan map.
The proposed Roadway Impact Fee CIP is listed in Tables 2.A — 2.E and mapped in Exhibits
3.A — 3.E. The tables show the length of each project as well as the facility's Mobility Plan
classification. The Roadway Impact Fee CIP was developed in conjunction with input from
City of Denton staff and represents those projects that will be needed to accommodate the
growth projected in the Land Use Assumptions section of this report.
2015 Roadway Impae4 Fee Study C, January 2016
City of Denton, Texas
� II li
i /� �, J'
��'� �� �
r(i(� `���-�
d�P� � a� � ��
i
Table 2.A. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan — Service Area A
, . Pro'. # IF C......� __.. ........� �...�.�
_..... % I n
Se rv ice Le ngth
� lass Raadway Limits Service
Arca '' (m�} Area
A-1 5A. Jim Christal (i) � 490' F nf C Wolfe 4o Thomas J E�an �.2� >0%
.,
A 2� 21 �iA J` e Loop to Masoh Branch 0 75 St}%
� �:...
im Chr�stal (2) 225' E of Futur
A 3 C 22 B?!V Jim Christal (31 iViasch Branch t€� Sun�ature----_ ] 23 50%
., � �
A-4
ff'A Jien S,he�.�Cal (4) 5cri�Yure tcr I 35 S�3C Yt 0 60 n(d�1�",�
A „ ....a ..,,
5 �'A Au�x��qrc _ MaschBeanchtal-35W SBFR 175 ]00%
A-6 `v`!4 . ,� �. . A.mv� .,. C, Wolfe to FM 249. . .,._ __ - _....
q 2.�r0 1d0%
_ A 7 ,. ._ SA _.... Shetby..... ........ ,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,, WestcouNOnderwood Yo Corbin ... �.��.t. , ..100%..�.�.
....._.__. _ - - .. ..., .....N S SA to Future Loo. �i.$7.
_. _ .
A 8 �A t taqr �� suw� wi G"�1 '��, d9 I Cole Ranch 100% �
........_. .. _ .... ,. � _ .. ,
A.••9 StL F'IVI 2�F44 (1} C Wolfe to 345' E of Cofe Ranch-Hunter Ranch Arteri�l ].07 ]00%
A-10 �,A _ .... � __ ...FIvI 2h44 (2j _ 345' E of Cole Ranch-H .............. � ..... ,..._ _ ---- —
�.. ....
unter ftanch Arterial to Underwood 1.27 100%
...A �.. _ _ ...
] SA �� Ca1e:[tinefr F. VJ SA. 9l2 - Cole Ranch N-S SA to Cole Ranch � ^ __...... __ __._......
-Hunter Ranch Arterial 1 06 1 dQ°/a
� ��� .._ .... __ .,.
- --
A-12 4A ff I Lrv�ly (1 � _ 725 E of Seabron to 1,975 W of C Wolfe 0 7�b 100%
. .. �
A-1�3 SA H i �vet� !?1 � I 975 W of C Woffe to C Wolfe 0 37 50"/0
. _ . .e � �m, e , . „_ � � .. _...o _ . ._ . .. . e. e . m, .,.
_'S_l�4 SA. H Li�elY (:�� ,,, .. _ m C Wolfe to John Paine/Underwood.�2) .. 2 4(7 100%
A-i5 �'A Hunter Ranch Arterial Hunter Ranch N-S Col #] to &rush Creek ?..22 I 100%
. ..,.,,m ... „ , z. . ..
.,
A-16 PA Srush Cree., ,�, , m,_..,,.,.. . _,.. �, ..
k(]) H unter Ranch N-S Col #2 to I-35 W 2 71 100%
_ _.. _ __ _
P`'17 .., ,... 9A P�i ll��lnqar�7 .� �, . F M 2.� .
_ - .m �l�d9t�Ftml:nrulY . ,,..... 0.62 1QCi°lo
_ _ .. _,
'°"" ,4-18 � C WolFe Ta�m Cale Co FM 2444 1.58 50°/a
� _.... �. A Fi I cvrky (4� �� � .,. ..,..
rn A 19 LL �. M_ _ 2�699 fo I-I Lrve1V d 63 �0/a
... �..... ... ..� _ .,,. ..w,_�. ___ __._.w.��.
A-20 SA Cole Ranch N-S SA T¢7m Cale pc� I i, Liveh! 2 39 100%
A-21� � �� PA ��� � ��� � �Cole Rano��� Hunter Ranch A�terial„ � ���������� ������ �� � Amvx to Hunter Ranch Arterial ����� �������� ��������� �����3 �3�� � 100%������"
n-
.. .. ... _..
A 22 F�/t Future Loop (2) Jim Chr�stal to 4,965 S of Jim Christal mm„ Q y4 �aQ"��
- � � �... _ �.. � . .. . ...� ....,�
A-23 PA F�� �
,, _ .. P.( � ___ 7$ ]ot7°lu
uture Loo 3 ... e. 260 �i ctf T�rm C:�le tcr 1 M 2449 1 _„ m m.
.. . ....... .. ............ . .... .....�. . .._,�..�� ................ ... ....... � ..,......n ........ „,,,,.,,,..� . .,_ _.• .. ...... �
A�2.4 PA Future Loo 4y 1 p40 W o ?(7l0
. ----
f Am x to Underwood 57 m„
-. _ ----. ..�... ... ...�.... .. ........... _ _.. _ .. �. . 100°l0
A-25 PA Future Loo {5} Urcderwcwd Car I-35VJ SBF�R d 73
A.-2G C Jim Christal-Tom Cole Colleetor Jim Christal to Tom Cole 0.76 IOd'%
_ �m
� 17 , . SA 1/2 Westco ,..
( ) urt Air�srct ta� Sprin�, �dc . _ 0.79 100"/, .
-- - -
A 2� SA Westcourt/Underwood Spr�rS�.;sicle tcr 1 7(}d � crfS r�e�n�side 0 32 ]00°!0
� _____,. ,., � �
A 29 SA Underwood (] 1 1s700 S of Sprin�sade to 2r655 N of FM 2449 Q 29 50%
� � � _,. .. .,....
l4-30 SA Underwood (2) 2,655' iV af EI� 24&9 ta FC�r12�b49 C1.SU lOQ'%�
� � .� , , �, ..,..... .. _._ � . ,..
e e, , 0'%
A-31 Sl� John Pame/Onderwood 11 FM 2449 to 10265' N of H Lrvel�„ _, y a 0.72 y
A-32 S/4 John ['a�nu(Underwood (21 1,2FiS P� af FI Livelv ta 97Q' N c�f Firu.sh � reek 0 62 1 UO%
� � � .,, _��, , �..e . . . . ., m... , ,,. �, _ . . .
A-33 5
�'A. Jcrhn Paine(Underw (3} 470' N of Brush Creek to Brush Creek 0.18 l00°/a
.. ,.... _ _ _....._ . ..... , .,..m._ ,..
_. ........ ...... ......
A 34 PA �""1 � y Western Jun Chr�stal to Air c�rrt 1 23 1Q0%
Ar 35 I � _ Precision ( I p __ � � ,lim Chr�ctalITtn 1z775 N af Aupart 0 42 I Od%
_ . _
A-36 �: F'recisiorr (2) 1 775' �d ��f Air trt tc� AAr� rt 0 34 EI�Y���fi�
Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
2015 Roadway Impad Fee Study � � January 2016
City of Denton, Texas
� � � � � ���
1 � ��� �
�yJy� ���J
�f,r I ; ,
Table 2.B. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan — Service Area B
Pro�. # IF Class �.�.... Roadway .........m. �mm ���� ...�
Service WWW m Length % In
Arca Limits � � Service
mi
Area
. ------- -- -- _........._ �. .m.� . --.._ w_ _ 1 100%
B 1 C Parvin Hi ,hland Park to McCormick 0.5
B 2 . `�� .m . , . ....,,.. . Hobson — —�-- _........ Country Club to TeasleY....,., . �----._ ._ 1 14 100%
.,�n , �. �
B-3 k�(# Vmta e 490 W of Bonme Brae to Fort Worth US 377} 0�G 100%
� �
_ _ �... ,�....�ww W.. . . ....� �.� ....�.. � .... __.�,.,m�e. ��,.,r,.� m .....
B-4 C Ef Pasea Country Club to Belmont 0 36 I 100%
..... .. �.. _ �
B 5 �,/� Rvan Country Club to Teasley 7 06 � 100%
B 6 wSA (1/2} Robinson �'� zea5leu to„?2O F af Wheeler Ridye ��� ai 5� � l00% ���
�_m _,_.,____ --- - -- (1} T.�, P .
�-i SA (]/2i y, _ e_ Robmson (2} 175 E of Berklev Yoa315' E of State School Rd t± �C3 � 100%� �
�.. B 8 C ]/3..�..,, �.�. � _ rr � r .. ... ._..... .... �.. _ , � . 100°/u
. .... .... C'�V 911 %% ..:...:.. .... , .,._ ""'
(, ) �.r���iBroBw��� --------. ad,a7dli�,,�rfV� rvAa d13. .. m .,
B-9 4", Creekdale (2) I _ 660 S. of Rvan to Th�stle Way „__ _ __ a.42 100%
-.. __....
B-j �
0 C(1/3} � ��cLkr�aq€, (31 Th�stle Wav to Riverp�ss „p, 0 12 50"/0 �
�, m, . ..,., . ..., �
B-i i Q�" 4 rrc kcfalc, (4) 21A E of Rroerchase Trail to 280 W of Pnnlico 0 60 ]00%
.._ ,6._.,..
(� � 35W NBFR to John Pame (Future� 6) 37 100%
B-12 PA Brush Creek. � . ....... 1'�.... , . . �,. ,, . . . _ �� .
�C 13 _ PA Brush Creek (3 Jahn Pa�r�e Futura to_2 010 E of John Ppia�¢ (Future� C� �� ] 00%
� � e„�,m �
.,--- _. � �.:,..:, . � ... .. W. of Fort Worth to 500� .. ���� � , ,, ,. om ,,,..
B-14 PA Srush Creek 4} 225 _rn n m '_ E of Fort Worth 0 14 100/
B-15 P�. Brush Creek (5} 500' E. of Fort WoRh to 2,] 80' East of FoR Worth d.32 50%0
� 8-16 PA Hickorv Creek (i) . j Count , Club to�
ickory Creek (2) R�verpass to ���f Country Cluh tP .�7 �aomi,
. r1' .
r�i� B 17 PA .... ... H.,,,,, ....�.. ,, m � ...... ... .... ��......,,_, tecRo U.�93 �0'%
�, .
B]8 PA i£ACkarav 4 sG �k (3} Montec,do ta Teasley 0 85 l00%
...., n .� _.
B 19 PAS]/3) Hickory Creek {4) Teaslev to Nautical 0.25 10(}"/0
--- u.. a _ _ ...
.....
" r Hickory Creek (5) Naut�cal to Erm 0 13 100'%
B'�� _ . �' �� � ���� _._ �_.. .... � e. ' ..... .. ........ . „ .. ,_.. .. . .. .__ _ . _, ...�.......�
B-21 __ PA Hickory Creek (6) Erin to State School Road {Future� Q Q� 143Q`%
13-�2 Q", John Paine-Fort Worth Collector #REFf 0.41 10(i'%u
�3 �� Q . _. (]1 _ _ Vmtn�e to Brush Creek � 4 ° � �
.
„ ,.m„ ' ] ]00/u
_ ..m , ,,.,_. _JohnPaine,. � _ _ �... � ,,,� .
��-2�& C" I John Paine (2) Cirush Creek to Johnson 0.50 50%
L3-25 C� . John Paine (3) Johnson�� � � ���
e ., . �. � . . ��,
9 100%
,,,� , m.m ,, ,. .�..._. _ ....... .. .... _. _ to 135 N crf Athens . 0 3..
B 26 �,� Bonnie Brae (4) I 35E SBF[t to Vmta�,e __„ 2 45 ]00%
�' ._., .� �.. ..�. � ...... ......... m.. 6.__... � � . �m % I
B 27 .,� Bonme Brae {5 Vmtd e to Fort WoRh lUS 377} � �
1 07 100
__ _ .
B 28 C Hi�hland Park 130 S of Willowerest to Raselawn d 78 100%0
_ __ _
... �� ._ , �... . ....�....
B 29 N'� Fort WaRh (US 377) I 35E to S C�ty Limits 5 13 100% ''
_._ ___.___�.. >� FM 1830 Fo � �_.m__ ____. __._
�� . ....... ... . .m _ }
B-30 rt WoRh (US 377 to Brush Creek 7 I�& 100%
_.
t; 36 C: Ryan-Creekdale Collec[or Ryan to Creekdale 0 48 100%
S�an�Jown to S�'._ � imits .. i.3 . �
�-3?.... rrPArrr . ....... i'a�¢sBew e ...... �.�... o
, 9 I 100% j
Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study j � January 201 6
City of Denton, 7exas
� � p�u �u���� i � � , ' , �
„i �� � � � � ��
Table 2.C. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan — Service Area C
Pro'. # IF Class � � Roadwa �_..... ... .......
...�
5ervicc Length � Tn
Area ' J Y Lim�ts (mi) Service
Area I
C;-1 SA Milam (1) I�35 SBFR to 175 F� of'I 35 NBFFt m„ ,,__ 0_09 ]00°/v I
. �,� ..._ � _„.. � ,�... .. .. .. _ �....__( � .... :..... 56°/v�
SA Mdam 42 ] 75' E of I 35 N�FR 40 5 M 2164 Locust 2 28 . �
�-3 C. _�........... Bobcat ............ . '�_ ' w , �
-- � ]OS W of Mdam Itrd�e ta HOD N Su.Secandary Arierra! 0 4...
1 100%
------- ��.,... . .. .. ...... ..... __.. ,,, ....... „..... ... , Y - 50°/m..IT..
C'4 __pA _ IT Uan�r 230 4V af dtc,cYor to FuYUre �ind QD �i�. . .. ..
C-5 �'�r Garbzer/Lon�, {,} 625' 4�/ of I 35 SF3FR tcs 35d' E of 1 35 NSFiZ �7 �� lOd%
.... .... _. _ .
.. � 2 1.� . 100%
C 6 SA - Gaawer/LanK (2i ..._„ .._.,..... d�anzer to FM 21fi4 �Locast) ......,,
_„_. ,_� _., ___ _ , _._..
�, 7 C Barthold Cind Collector Barthold to 1,135' W of Cmdy (Future) 0� d 10t�"'�'�
_... ... ,. .. ., __ --- 1'_......_ , ......... , _. .,,,,. ., � _
__.....
C-8 C Masch Branch-I-35 Collector �95 W oPl-35 to I 35 0 25 100%
.., _
J�riw.rinl q -
.�,
� � � m,e.mm., ,,,,?�' _... ,. 6 100%
L9 S � 0 01
p m e F � 9R 19 �@ Gh+' �ru'� �ru�c9 Ma 1� HC}T� N S Sec�ncLx Arterial t 840' � of Hd�i) NmS r __.. ...
„ -----. .. ----�--�, .,,. ,,,, ,,,,, ,,,,, , , ,, , ,. ,,. _ . %
C-]0 SA �HOD E-W Secondarv Arterial (2) 840' E of HOD I�I S Secondary Arterial ta 130' E c�f E�onn�e 0 44 SO eTw„
-- ., � � � , 0%0
C-11 SA HC9D E-W '�� ��arW¢� ruy +�a�1cw r,al (3) 130' E of E3onnre F3raa (Ewstm�} ta FM 2�fi4 (Ls�cust) �'.��r l6
„ ) -._. �,.,, _ _.,. 50%
C-12 PA � HWY 1173 �l 460' E of Rhasch �ranch (Cwstmr�,) to 375 E oi Barthold 0.52 �
C-13 PA HWY 1173 (2) Cindv to I-35 SBFR d.60 i00%
.. _,.. .. ,,.,mm ... , „e,. � ,, — ... ___�_ � � , u _ � .,
C-14 PA � If�� Elm (US 377) I-35 NBFR to Ehn/Locust Couple,t I 3.0] 100%
5 Q: Hercules 115 E; of North intc_t� Locust I 0 4] ]00%
C 16 SA . ._ ..... n �...,.WesY�,atc_��:�,��� � .. .. ....Weat�ate (N Sl�o Bonme Brae.. ....... � �:M56.. � . ��.�%�.m�..
` Rmey (1) Bosmie Brae Yo 990 W a�f Elm 0 34 100%
C-17 �.. . ,... . ,� .., � . . . .......... .. .__ . �__ _ ... , . .. ....... ..... ..,... .. ,w.. . �, . ....', .... ..
.C'�..g . �, �.� m.� ................... Rmey��2a. ...._,.., _ .. ..,..., � .9.90��W ot.E.l�??�.?�'.E.�."�.. ..... 0.19. � !.�.d��6.�....,
C, 19 S/� Masch Branch I 35 Secondary ARenal Masch Branch to T 35 SBFR 1 34 100%
. ...... . � � ... . . .. ..
C 20 SA I Jim �hr�stal 1} 490' � of C Wolfe tq Ih mas J E�;an 0 79 50%
-
� m . �... �
A 2, �"�•24 SA Jim �hristal (2} 225' E of Future Loop fo Masch Branch 0.75 50%
A 3 C 22 P. . O Masch B .
_' A Jim �hrisEa a cripture ] 23 50%
� G23 SA Nad (1) Unrversity to 2240' S o
_
ranc to S __ _
' f UmversiN 0 42 I Sd°r�
.� � �, _
_ . . _ � tal 0 47 100%
C-24 SA _ Nail (2) 2.240 S of Unrversitu to�3un Chr�s _ m
� C 25 G:` "fhomas J E�;an (]) S55 N ��f IJniversil Po 550' S o4'Univ�rs 0 2l 100°/a
_ _ . . � . m , .. ... .. , ._ _ Y ...m ni .. ...... .. . ...... ... --- -
e; C 26 C, Thomas J E�an {2) 550 S oiUniversitv to�Jim C,hrisfal 0 66 50%
� _. � .....m T uture LooE?..� �.�.. . ,_ .' Umversdv tq 745 N of Jim Chr�stal. .,. �. 0 5..... %
� 27 P 6 100
w�._.... �... _, _ _ ] 173 to Miller __ d 79 50% ....
G-2& PA ......... � Mas�h�ranch.��.!_ .� 1,290 SofHWY.meem.......... __ _ .... ... .....
C-29 PPd Masch I3ranch (�� 895' 4V of Future Loop 4a� ] 255' N of Universrey __ 0 59 l00%
C-30 P.4 Ivlasch �ranch (3} 1,255 N of Unroersity to Jim Chr�stal 1 02 100%
--. _ ... . .... .. .. . .... � _ - — �
C-31 SA I.over's Lane ( I} H WY ]] 73 to 325' N of Fruth d.27 50%
C-32 "�A I.over s Lan
� ��� � e(2}���� � 325'NofFruthto340'N�of� ����� �
_. - . _..— --
'Liltfebraok 0 R7 100�",„i� �
... _...... _.� . ................_. mm .______._ _�,.. .
C-33 SA Lcsver s Lane {3) 340' N oCLdUebrook ta� Ho�k „ 0 1Q 50%
m �_ ..... __....__ . _ _ ,. .� � ---- -
C-34 SA La�ver's Lane (4} Hook ka Masch Branch-1-35 3A QJl 100%
.mm.. . . � _ .... ......... .... — _ ,.._,
C-35 SA Ba�ihold
_ �m ,_..., w,,... _ m,,,,P�, C�anzer tm City Limits 0 58 50%
.. �e ,� , _.,
e, (ianzer tq, 1�280 S of Qanzer 0 24 50%
C;-36 S�# Cindy� Q ] �
_
C 37 SA __ Cindv (2) 1,280 S of Ganzer to Mapch Branch I 35 Collee2or 0 41 IQO%
C-38 SA Cincly" �:�?_ FM l 173 {Futurel t<a 190 S nf FuQure La€�P _m � 42 100%
Ca39 SA .� m . Cmdv (4). _ I,O50 hd of Masch Bran�h I.35 PA to 7`ieszen .. 0..82 100%mm m
C-40 SA Cmdv ��j Tiesr�n to Universitv p.3( 1�po��
. .. � . . , , �, _ . _._ ....�.
C-41 PA #� ) [JmversYry to Jim Chr�staC Gd ;",u;� 100°fi,
�__.... _ _ , 2/�) Westem l„ e...w..... „ . ..�.,_ _ ,.... ............. _ _.
......, �, .. — -
..�.42.... _.___.� _.------- Mlam Bobcat Col ...m Ividam Yo �obcat Futurel ..�.-----_
0 57 100%
C 43
SA HOD N S"�ca �srasVau�y Arterwl �
l Y Mdam to 220' S of Bobcat 0 58 l00°r�4�
_. --- _� �._ ,,,. _._,
C-44 SA HOf� N-S Secondary ArteriaC (21 2830 N of Elm to Elm m 0 54 lOd%
�.,, _ ... _...
� 45 W SA m Heei1 s� q°z�ail Unrvera�tv to Scri�ture 0 77 1Qd%
� _ ee� ___�_�__, _� ..�. .�......
' �.�, _- _.-- — }. ..m . _ P, . � ........ _ � „�„�,. � . ....
�� /�
� 46 I A Sonme Brae (1 Mdam °
mm .�
m Loo .288 EBFR 3 17 1d0 w w'
G47 SA I��x�a�e�e f�rswa; (�y L,00� 288 EBFR to �60 N ot Riney 0 43 100%
C,-48��-14 azF� . � Sonnae Eirae ("'} University to I-35 _. � l 41 , 50%
C-49 i: Fallmeadow ]40' S of Meadow id�e„ta� Gardenview 0 19 100%
_. . , . ,
C SO,D-45 PA FM 2164 (Locust) (l) Crtv Lienrts to Loop 288 WBFR 2J0 Sd%
� . �,, „ �. � . .
CS l-46 YA F114 21fi4 (T,nru;�k 2 �. J a� ,2fiR WRF� tn film 1 41� S(1°/�
Notes: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order; HOD: Hills of Denton.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study j 2 January 2016
City of Denton, 7exas
� � � �� �� ��� ,, ,,
��� �.�:� .
Table 2.D. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan — Service Area D
� _�.� .... ...... �
% In
Seav�ca�'' Length
' Proj. # IF Class Roadway Limits Service
Area ' �mi) Area
...,. _. _,_.._,_ _ .�. , ' _ �#_ � . ]Od%
D 1 µ � FM 2164-Brrttanv H�ll Colk.u4or 1} 1.605 E of FM 2164 to 745 W of Mes uite Rid e 0 57 m „��,
iS � � FM 2I64 Srrttan� Hill CaYW.eY��r d A� 745' W of Mesguite Rid�,e to Mesguite Ridge 0.14 5(9mlo
D-3 C FhA 21b4,8aaitany H�A Collector (31 �Mes uite Rid e to BnttanV Hill 0 49 106%
_ m � .. � ��.,..
.` _ ���w� u�) City Limits to 62d' S �f Somerset 2.173 lOd%
D-4� �rotR FM2153�1��s�la�,.. __ ...�,,, � ...., .�...... _
D-5 PA FM 2164-F � - -- to Indian Wells Future) 0,73__ 100%
.
M x9�:� {f�� Ml�r tii� a4 PA FM 2164 (Locack� {�. „ p,
�. , , �
C7-�i PA FM 2i64-FM 2153 �p��°�Pi�r�u�� YA Mesqurte Rid�e (Future) to FM 2i53 („aeali�;ned)� me ,,, 1 i9 100%
L) � SA FM 2164 PM 2]5
... 3 SA (1 }� „p FM ?1.64 (T tt�, Sfs� to Indian lRlells (Fu[ure� El "�3 100%
. a a::II. . SA , FM 2164-FM 2153 SA (21 540' E of Green Vallev (f uture} Yo FM 2153 � 0 40 100°/a ,
Iz-�� u �a -- to FM 2153 d 28 1d0%
...... .x� �.� � � a, She r�� 1,490' W o4' FM 2153�.�, m....... ,,,, �__
D-10 �` Gnbbfe Springs�Chapman Collector 630' N of FM 21G4-Brittany Hill Callector to Grbble Springs ].69 100%
D 11 -� Mesqurte Rid6'. .,,, �_ .,., m
, e�l� FM 2164 Brdtany Hill Collector to ��x t�����
40d N of LM 2164-FM 2i53 (Reali>ned} PA
_ ..,, � ... .... , � .., _ , _ �., ..... . ,
47O' S of F M ���qFM 2i 53 (Reahgned} PA to
L1 tl� �, Mesqurte Rid6e (2) 0 16 50%
No
... e� pp.Ppp .PPe FM 2153,(Redli�medi PA
T)-13 �, M. Mesqurte Rid�e (3} 1? OS' S of[FM,2 64�FM12 53 (Re I� e}dl PA I 0 10.. ]00% .
355' S of Covey to 0
D-14 SA BnttanyHdf(1} 0,78 ]00%
795' S of FM 2164 FM 215�Reali�med� PA
. _,.. � ---___ —....
D-15 SA Brittany Hifl (2} 795' S af PM 2164FM 2153 (Realigned} PA to Q.20 50%
770' N af FM 2] 64-FM 2153 SA
..... _,,_.... _.. .. .... . . m. ,. W ..... ..,.. � . � � � .. _ � .� . �100%.......
D l.6 .� ........ FM 2153 (1) Citv, Limits to Bur �er_ S 1`u1„ ..
........... _w ...... ��� .�, ,� �,, �.,,.� __��._ J�__ � . °�.
D 17 re" FM 2I53 2 Bur er to FM 2153 Redli ed C12A 100%
D 18 ... _ ,,, ,. � �. �.�....i� ...� ,_ ..... .......... , „da , ,) . _ . .._..-- -._ ............. .. 100%
G FM 2153 ��aa�NC ir�t9 'V 1�9 2153 Collector FM 2153 tfteah ned to FM 2153 0 79
D-19 SA, FM 2153 (3} Fi2(1' S af S�mezsek to Shexman ]. ]4 '��� SQ%��
n-ao s��, ............. � � _._ ..
� . � W � f Wa�schu ��, .
� _ � _ . o Sher�nan 0.23 100%
rn D-21 SA Green Valle � arschun to 860 S o n O,16 lOQ/
A Green Valle
e_ � �.� �.�. �. rrr_ _
. ... . e �'. {.�.�p .. .,. _ . ___.___ 860' S af Warschun t . � �_ "
D-22 SA I Milam �3) m. , PM 2164 (Locust) ta 605 E of FM 2164e„� � . oo ..
_;' rLo��t� _... o�t ioai
D-23 SA Bohcat (3} , ., FM 2164 (Loc� Yo 515' E of FM 2164 (La,ust} . � 09 I 100%
D-24 ,"� f`ardr�u^r Creek Q 1� 860' W af Hartlee-Coo�er Colfector tl ] Yo Hartlee Field 2.13 l Od%
� _�.. _ �'_ .��„, w . ,_ . � �...,.. . , . ..w,... . ___.__.....
D-25 ,�;�t _ CooPer Creek (2} Sdver Dame ta Fishtrap p�'� 5�°�a
� — . � „ _.,�
r) 76 '�'� _ Coo r Creek ( „ ��� �t to 1lniversity 0 50 100°/a
pe 3V I FiShtr�
m ..,.., rv.
I) 2'7 C:; Uolden Circle Hartlee Field (F'uiure} to FIartlee Field (Exutin�,} .,, 1 78 � 100%
. D. 28 . �SA . Hartlee Field_(1 ! T'M 71f4..�i cFCi��t�„tcr SOO,F �f FM 2164 (Lcx.ust� _ 0 09 I l00%
," aRlae Field (2) WesY City Limits ta Woodland Hdl l lU 100%
D-29 °�A .. f�... , .. ...........,,,,,.. -.. _ . .
D 30 S" Lon�, (1} FM 2IG4�LocusY} Yo 525��E oFFM 2164 Oel(7 100%
_ ... _
D 31 �` Lon�. (2). � � �__ ,_� � __ City Limds to Stuart _ 0 34 100%
_ . ..... ... _m _.
D-32 �; Hartlee Field (3) Sherman to 515' E. of Sherman Q43 100%
� _.
otlector Kin�s_Row to Windsor 0 09 IOQ%
D 33__ G, Kin�s-Wmdsor..C.. .....r . . ........ .......... . . � _ ...._. .. ......,.. ..
..
T�-.34 �" Windsor 410 E of Saints to Cooper Creek 1.02 100%
_ � . . ---
D 35 S�� Mingo(2A' iIn
iver5rtv tn 455 E af Coaper Creek d7 `d5 100%
A
D-36.w . ., . p... _. . . .�. .u.. . .. n.tY P,,,� P� . _: ) � o.o ,
A Post Oak 1} N C' L`m'ts to Coo r Creek {Future d 86 ] 00 /
LYw:�? PA Post 0ak/Caoper Ce�����. Cooper Creek (Futurel to Hartlee Field i9 �da e 100% �
�➢ �,� a�, �.�PA ., w.. ., ,,,,, . , , _ ,Post Oak (2} _.. . ...... Radroad 4o FishtraP.. — _ C� 3 3 100%,awa,
D-39 PA Post Qak (3} Fushtrap to 940 S af F�shtrap_ � Q.18 a0°l,�
�.
B 40 PA Post Oak (4) 940' S of Fishtrap to Umyersrty 0 07 100%
� a „ � _ �.. . �., .
D 4] C �7a �ti�vc�ard� 2,855 N of Km�s Row to 680 N of Km�s Row 0.41� iQ0%
�_ .,e _ __ .. _
D-A2 Q; — �-X�rklc e G erzr�r�a d�rB 1� ci tdc,c. I Mc.NcP 6�r f:nayp�ei � r� �Nc 0 82 YQaI"!,�
...
D43.�rt PA _...__. _Sherman(l} .. .� . LacusttoLoop288WBFR 2.30 1d0%
.. _ _.
D 44 T A Sherman (2� Loop 288 WBFR to Cdy Limits 4 65 i00%
w.. . ..... .. � , — -__ _.r � � .. e �.�.�. � � W ...�� , , �a ... . .. .�.�� . ..... ... .... ..._�
.
C 50 D 45 �'A FM 2164 (Locust} (1} CRV Limrts to Laop 288 WBFR 2,70 5d%
C` 51.17..�� PA _ .. FM 2164 Loc:ust (�p � ...� ..�^..,� ... ....... ., . .
..
oc� 288 WaFR to Elin 1,41 Sd°/n
Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee 58udy j 3 January 2016
CiBy of Den9on, 7exas
� �� ��������
����� � � �
,� ��:
� ��
Table 2.E. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan — Service Area E
serv°C r�o.._ .. ....................... .....��._... ..__.�.... ........��
are
% In
e j. # TF Class Roadway Limits 1-ength Servlce
a �m�� Area
�' , .. �.. . ._ . .. , .. ,. ... .... . .. . ._ .... ] 00°/a
E-1 SA Min o(1} 43S NE crf Bell to Unrversiry 2 06
E-2 C Lattimore Ruddell to 475' E of Ruddel! 0.09 100%
_ ___ . .,,. — - — -
-- Y
F 3_ � __ Audra Aa field ta 1 oop 288 0 27 ]00%
_ m. , m
E-4 � £Sla��. MayhlltoLakeview l28 ]00°/m
F? SA It�eKmncv (FM �4BEr} Woodrow to East City Limds 3.95 100%
.. � -
� E6 �, Duchess�lJ .,,�..a.__ __ Wtrodrowt�� ll5'WofTradhead �� �75 ]00%
� �� r„ . °
_ . ---- _
E 7 C(i/2} I)uches� 2 115 WpfTrailheadto 1,000' W ofLoo 288 03� 100%
.. ��) e......... ... _ .P � �,„ .. ,, __....,..
- -... ...__.._� . ---- --...._� ..... ..... _...... .......,... . _. .... s l00%
--E-8 �' Morse (] Wo�drpw to Shadv Oaks 0 2" ,,
E 9 SA. t/2 Morse 2) K�mberlv to Mavhdl 0 5] 100%
_ _ __(_ )..,,,_....___ ___.�____. S.._� _.._..--
.... -
I�i0 �if4 S�encer �4RS F oP�,�,� 2�8 to Mavhill � 0 34� 10�%
__ _ _ _ __..
C Lakeview (i) Post Oak (Futurel to 1025 E af Post Oak (Future} (�, l��;y ]00%
�' ' 1 �.... . .._ � _ .. . . _ . . .. � ... .__. _ . _...._ __ ..__ ..... ...... �„ ---__ � ._._
C_ 12 � Lakeview (2) 2 745' E of Post Oak (Future) to Bisho „Pme 0.36 100%
.... ............ m ..... � � ,,, �. ,,.,,,,,,. ._m _ _�____._ . - — -..__. . . P .,,,.:,.. _.__._._.,
&;-13 G Edwards 560' E of Mavhill to Swisher 1.02 100%
W C-48.E-14 SA �,....... A Bonnie Brae . .......................... .____ __-- . r a,.....
a E-15 �" Ruddell M�n�o to Will'NBFR ] 4l �(7°/u
(3} Unroersrtv to I 35E
�.. . ..,. .. �� ,
� ' �s d ] l ] 00% �
e „� � _
E-16 � Mockin�bird McKmney to 850 S of McKinnev 0.16 i00%
..._._. ........_ , ,. ,.. ,,.. .... _ _w .... , , , 6. .....
E]7 �A Brinker �� Shady,0aks to Spencer 0.53 100%
—
E18 S61 Mayhill(1} Unrversd�toColorado 3P�� 100%
� � __ . .._ e,e ,ee ..,
H-V9 PA (1/31 Mayhdl (2) Colorado to 1-35E NBFR 0.45 100%
_ . _.__ ,,.
E-20 PA Post Oak (5) Univer5'rky to 1€}1O i`� rrf t31���, 0 33 1d0%
__, , � �.
E-21 P (6) 1 O10 N of Bla�,�, to 1 650' S of B la� U 50 50% �
P` . Post Oak. .. .. ..... .. .. ......... . _. ,... ........ _ , .... ...
, L 22 F'?` Post Oak (7! . m . m 1m490' N of Mills to 2,400 N of McKinney (179 100%° ...
E:-23 PA F'ersE �Jak (8k 123(3 N ot McKinnev to Pockrus P�e I 2�48 100%
--- _ --- _... _ _ . .. .......... ... . . . . ..... . „ — .. ....
�' __ 100%
E 24 PA k'asp ��k (9) Pockrus Pa e to Ldkevoew � 27
E-25 C Lakeview (3) 130' S of Rodeo to 735' S of MiILs (?.3i 100%
_ _�_ .... _._._ ., ,...
�:-26 � Trmrty McKinney Connector (l ) Tnmty to 1290 N of McKmney 1 27 YtJO`Yo
___�.,�._.. __ �..., m� .,... . ..._ --- _ _.
�-2"1 SA Trinity-McKinne Connector (2) 1290' N oFMcKinnev to McKinne Q.24 IdQ'%
Note: The 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is not in a prioritized order.
2015 Roadway ImpacP Fee Study j 4 January 2016
City af DenPOn, 7exas
0 ����� �� �� ������� �
IV.COMPUTATION METHOD FOR ROADWAY IMPACT FEES
� "�u' . ...7
ulf �
� .��� ,���� � � "..
A. Service Areas
The five (5) service areas used in the 2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study are shown in
Exhibit 1. These service areas cover the entire corporate area of the City of Denton.
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that "the service area is limited
to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed
six (6) miles."
B. Service Units
The "service unit" is a measure of consumption or use of the capital facilities by new
development. In other words, it is the unit of ineasure used in the 2015 Roadway Impact Fee
Study to quantify the supply and demand for roads in the City. For transportation purposes,
the service unit is defined as a vehicle-mile. Below is the definition for vehicle-mile.
Vehicle-Mile: The capacity consumed in a single lane in the PM peak hour by a vehicle
making a trip one mile in length. The PM Peak is used as the basis for transportation
planning and the estimation of trips caused by new development.
Total Vehicle-Miles of Supplv: Based on the total length (miles), number of lanes, and
capacity (vehicles per hour) provided by the Denton Mobility Plan (see Appendix B).
Total Vehicle-Miles of Demand: Based on the 10-year growth projections (Pg. Error!
Bookmark not defined.). The demand is equal to PM Trip Rate (trips) * Trip Length (miles).
The capacity values used in the 2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study are based upon
Thoroughfare Capacity Criteria published by the North Central Texas Council of
Governments (NCTCOG) and applied to City of Denton thoroughfare standards. Tables 3A
and 36 show the service volumes as a function of the facility classification and type.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study 20 January 2016
City of Denton, Texas
� ,�� ��� ��� `�� � �� � . ��
,
� ����� ��;����: �� � �"
Table 3A. Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities
(used in Appendix B— Roadway Impact Fee CIP Service Units of Supply)
_ � ...______ .......................��.._ _... ..._. ___..�
Hourly Vehicle-Mile
Facility Classification Median Configurafion Capacity per Lane-Mile of
Roadway Facility
Primary Arterial (PA) Divided 850
Secondary Arterial (SA) Divided � 750
.� .� ......__ �_.��
Collector (C) Undivided 550
Table 36. Service Volumes for Existing Facilities
(used in Appendix C— Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory)
Roadway Hourly Vehicle-Mile
Description Capacity per Lane-Mile of
Type Roadway Facility
_
2U-R Rural Cross-Section 150
(i.e., gravel, dirt, etc.)
2U-H Two lane undivided — Arterial Type 725
2-1 W Two lane — one way couplet 650
2U Two lane undivided 425
,
3-1 W Three lane - one way couplet 700
3U Three lane undivided (two-way, left-turn lane) 550
4U Four lane undivided 550
_ m......�,���.
4D Four lane divided 750
... _......
6D Six lane divided 850
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study 2 j January 2016
Cify of Denton, Texas
� ��°°�°�� ' �� �� �'��'
C. Cost Per Service Unit
ir"�'�
r, r, '�/
�fl ��;
A fundamental step in the impact fee process is to establish the cost for each service unit. In
the case of the Roadway Impact Fee, this is the cost for each vehicle-mile of travel. Thus, it is
the cost to construct a roadway (lane-mile) needed to accommodate a vehicle-mile of travel.
The cost per service unit is calculated for each service area based on the roadway projects
within that service area.
The second component of the cost per service unit is the determination of the number of
service units in each service area. This number is the measure of the growth in transportation
demand that is projected to occur in the ten-year period.
D. Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costing Methodology
All of the project costs for an arterial or collector facility which serves the overall
transportation system are eligible to be included in the Roadway Impact Fee Capital
Improvements Plan. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that the
allowable costs are "...including and limited to the:
1. Construction contract price;
2. Surveying and engineering fees;
3. Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's
fees, and expert witness fees; and
4. Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer
or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who
is not an employee of the political subdivision."
The engineer's opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP is
based, in part, on the calculation of a unit cost of construction. This means that a cost per
linear foot of roadway is calculated based on an average price for the various components
of roadway construction. This allows the probable cost to be determined by the type of
facility being constructed, the number of lanes, and the length of the project. The cost for
location specific items such as bridges, highway ramps, drainage structures, and any other
2015 Roadway Impaet..Fee StUay .....................��� _m... . .... ._,.,.,...�_ _.�..� _
22 January 2016
City of Denton, Texas
�
� �� � �� ��������� �� A
,�,,,
��
�°� . ���
special components are added to each project, as appropriate. The following is a detailed
description of the costing worksheet/methodology for the Roadway Impact Fee CIP.
1. Overview of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costing Worksheets
For each project a specific costing worksheet was developed (see Appendix A). Each
worksheet contained the following four (4) main components:
• Project Information,
� Construction Pay Items,
• Construction Component Allowances and
• Summary of Costs and Allowances
Project Information
Construction Pay Items
Construction Component
Allowances
.r"'"
�
�.�
City of Denton
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
�J��rrem; Bannie Brae (5)
Limits: Vinlage to Fort Worth (US 377)
Impad Fee Cla�: SA
Ultimate Class: Secondary Arterial
Length (I�: 5,655
Service Area�s�: B
�,��,���a
Kimley-Hom arid AssociaPes, Inc,
uPdaied: tan3izo9si
This proJect conslsts of the reconstructlon of the
existing pavement to a four lane divlded concrete
secondary arterial.
Paving
d TfafflC d�;aaa[e�ul Can�hPn.rc1lon G'N1;z¢¢�'IYa4Pds G;aroVral �i°Yca .�
� PawmentMarkingslSigns/Posts Inc�nd�;vlri�im�.y.;i�ro±zP�srl�k:yta:!krfhm�iikie, 3� �.�
J RoadNey Dfain2g6 ��,`.uu;and�r� Ilrvkrnv�nl �y�Ce.nu �C1���� �i
J Illumination a`��� '�
J Special Drainage Slructures ��r.�r�ima,yea cxr.�Maugr,sr Y�l9„ S
� Wate� '��.IUNirar9hdN.r�AmeroP�. ?°f� �P'
J SeWef ��...'.N4nar94dy�r.::Vmen�OS 9�i �'
d Landscapong and Irrigatian �`��� '�4'
Intereectionlmprovements ''���.d�.�irre:fi,ruuuc��Pawt ��'�'
ME�s���r:eliux�r�uus�:. �ta I�
""k�IWnri�arua� kansaxi r�n'En u'�P V'avlm�y GauwunoeuPNr�si Cm�.su .]oalo4r.N�l � AIIoW ence SUbtot8l.� $
139,669
B3,B01
836,692
139,669
B�, 000
55,867
27,934
167,802
�
9 � m...���a �u: a e,aas,aze
Pavin r?n7Td ,A 9i�arorr�w�u �� n
Mobllsa�Nara�r„ �,�,^ $ 756,BB9
Construdfon Contin enc i �h
�n $ 252,296
Prep #itW�P �� �� ������� .� � S 151,370
Construction CostTOTAL; a 6,207,000
� ,, q ' ,
Item Dascn tion Notes: . Allowance Item Crast
Summary of Costs ��,.� co��ti��o�: - s s,zor,000
and Allowances � � . � a—. ... � ..............__ _. ° � .... ._���za0
En ineenn ISurve /TesNn
Other
n ection � �
�.�,..,.,,,�,. RQW/Fasement Ao_ ulsltlon: E'x��vMr auaamrviwn¢ "tla,'/u „ 1,05
Im actFeePro'ectCostTOTAL: E 8,,348,000
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study 23 January 2016
City of Denton, 7exas
� ��°�"�����' ��� ��'��������
2. Project Information
^!���� .
�9;rt f3��..
In order to correctly estimate the cost of a roadway project, several attributes are first
identified:
• Project Number — Identifies which Service Area the project is in with a corresponding
number. The corresponding number does not represent any prioritizations and is used
only to identify projects. For example, Project A-10 is in Service Area A and is the 10'h
project on the list.
• Name — A unique identifier for each project. In some cases abbreviations are used for
the project name. For example, a roadway within the Hills of Denton may be shown as
HOD. In cases where roadway names are unknown the connecting limits may be used
such as FM 2164 - FM 2153 SA represents a secondary arterial (SA) that connects FM
2164 to FM 2153.
• Limits — Represents the beginning and ending location for each project.
• Impact Fee Class — The costing class to be used in the analysis. The impact fee class
provides the width for the various elements in the roadway. The construction costs are
variable, based on the proposed Mobility Plan classification of the roadway. For
example, PA stands for Primary Arterial. A PA Impact Fee Class means the entire
roadway is to be constructed. Additional classifications are utilized in cases where a
portion of the facility currently exists and the road is only to be widened. The following
notations are used for these projects:
o"(1 �2)" for facilities where half the facility still needs to be constructed;
o"(1 �3)" for future six-lane principal arterials facilities where two additional median
lanes are needed
o"(2/3)" for future six-lane principal arterials facilities where four additional lanes are
needed
• Ultimate Class — The functional classification on Denton's Mobility Plan.
• Len th ft — The distance measured in feet that is used to cost out the project.
• Service Area(s) — Represents the service areas where the project is located. In some
cases the project is located either in the ETJ or NAA.
• Description — Used to describe the project type assumed in the costing such as a widening
or reconstruction.
zo i.....������ � � �� ._.._._._._._�,, � ,,,,,,
5 Roadway Impact Fee Study 24 Jonuary 2016
CITy of Denton, Texas
Ilp
� ���� �� �,��� ��������� ��e�
� �'��4','r�'�NI�
�
3. Construction Pay Items
A typical roadway project consists of a number of costs, including the following: planning,
survey, design engineering, permitting, right-of way acquisition, and construction and
inspection. While the construction cost component of a project may actually consist of
approximately 100 various pay items, a simplified approach was used for developing the
conceptual level project costs. The pay items for both concrete and asphalt roads are shown
in Table 4.
Table 4. Construction Cost Pay Items
����.�.��.���,�,����� w RRR�� � �
Concrete Pay Items As�halt Pay Items
���nnnnnnµ Unclassified street excavation • Unclassified street excavation
• Lime Stabilization • Lime Stabilization
• Concrete pavement and curb • Type C asphalt top layer
� Sidewalk • Type B asphalt base layers
• Turn lanes and median openings • Sidewalk
• Curb and gutter
,
• Turn lanes and median openings
,�� �,�� �MM���,M� m���������n� �
4. Construction Componenf Allowances
A percentage of the paving construction cost is allotted for various major construction
component allowances, as appropriate. These allowances include traffic control, pavement
markings and signage, roadway drainage, illumination, minor water and sewer adjustments,
landscaping and irrigation. These allowance percentages are also based on historical data.
In addition, lump sum dollar allowances are provided for special drainage structures,
railroad crossings, and intersection improvements where needs are anticipated. The paving
and allowance subtotal is given a fifteen percent (15%) contingency, five percent (5%)
mobilizations, and three (3%) preparation of right-of-way to determine the construction cost
tota I.
5. Summary of Cost and Allowances
To determine the total Impact Fee Project Cost, sixteen percent (16%) of the construction cost
total is added for engineering, surveying, and testing. In addition, three and a half percent
(3.5%) of the construction cost total is added for inspection for non-TxDOT projects.
2015 Roadway ImpacT Fee Study 25 January 2016
CiPy of Denton, Texas
�:���.. � �m�nm ��. �nn�k ��� "r�V ,� ..f�..
ll�
�.�,����. . � ���i� .. ' .
Percentages are also allotted ROW/easement acquisition. ROW�easement acquisition was
based on whether the project was an existing alignment or future alignment. For an existing
alignment, the ROW/easement acquisition cost was provided an allotment equal to 15% of
the construction cost total. For a new alignment, the ROW�easement acquisition cost was
equal to 30% of the construction cost total. The value for ROW�easement acquisition is an
estimated contribution allocation and does not represent actual ROW�easement acquisition
needs. This allotment was based on an assumption of $2-$3 per square feet for ROW
acquisition. For TxDOT facilities assumed no ROW/easement acquisition was allotted.
Cash funds allocated from roadway escrow agreements have been subtracted from the
corresponding City projects.
The Impact Fee Project Cost Total is then the Construction Cost Total plus engineering,
surveying, testing, and inspection; plus ROW/easement acquisition; and minus roadway
escrow agreements. Based upon discussions with City of Denton staff, state highway projects
were included with a projected contribution of twenty percent (20%) of the total project.
E. Summary of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costs
Tables 5.A — 5.E are the 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP project lists for each service
area with planning level project costs. Individual project cost worksheets can be seen in
Appendix A, Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections. It should be noted that these tables
reflect only conceptual-level opinions or assumptions regarding the portions of future project
costs that are recoverable through impact fees. Actual project costs are likely to change with
time and are dependent on market and economic conditions that cannot be predicted.
The Roadway Impact Fee CIP establishes the list of projects for which Impact Fees may be
utilized. Projects not included in the Roadway Impact Fee CIP are not eligible to receive
impact fee funding. The cost projections utilized in this study should not be utilized for the
City's construction CIP.
2015 Roadway Impoct Fee Study 2�j January 2016
City of Denfon, Texas
� �i � � ��� � � �"��
Table 5.A — 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP
with Conceptual Level Cost Projections — Service Area A
��'�!
,
�,, �,P
$��'�� Proj. # CI€vss Rondway Limits Cosl in Service
PaCL`Y6 Arca
''� A-i SA 7im (:hratal (Y} 490' E of C, Wol[e 4o'I'hoinas J. Egan ''� 5 ?.,d1�5,GJf!t1
. A 2 C 21 ��� SA —_.---- — Jim Chratal (2) -----.._— ........ ........225' E of Future�.oapYO.... .....�,-__ ._� . ...............
.,. , ____ ..,......._ .. ,
Masch6ranch � �� 3,4t�„.'SQM7
� A.3,�C 22 _........PA _.... . Jim Chrstal.(3} ,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,, ............. ..Masch Hranch to Scripture � ...._._..� �,.... 7 19G.SQ0.,,
A-4 PA Jim Christal (A} Scrip(ure to 1-35 SDC'R '���.. S S,GIT,OW
.....__�...� .._..._.._..�.� .......,..... ......... Air�xf ... ..� ..... . ........�,.......W..�,....... .MaschBranchtol-35WSBi'R�......._.._�.. . ,w.,.. „ .. .,$._. . L.93Q800.,
� w ....... . ................ ....... ,.. ,.. .. . .... .......,........ .,�.....,... ............... . .............,....... �........... ----....— .....--- , .,.....,..... ,,..,...... .......... . ..�_ . , ,.__,.�..,,,,.
fl-6 SA Amvx C. Wolfe lo FM 2494 ��. � 23,125,Ott0
�..�,�.. .. ,.M ...... ...... .�.... _ .....,.....�_� . � �.Y.... � .� ........ ._ .... .....,. �. , .,.._m..�._.__ -- ��----�--- ......�.... .. _ ... .+w __ . _.._..,..,�._._....
-7 �A. �vhclG �(a��tkc�ru���UiJr��'erwdrar:cV ta.r S.'arorbiero , � 5,946,
...�.,kG SA . ................ ....�:nla��d.,zur,CG�.:..WTU'SM,dit ..__.......---- .............._ ... . .._........._.P�alaa�B,anQ.�hPJ � 1eY faaPitili��e.�,..,,..m_..�--- -.�..._.. .. _._—..
- �` q..cxy�u 9° fn,GY29�,Q�MMI
.........._. ..,... ,�.� ............._. _�,...�.��...m_ � ._,__.. , .....__ �___...---- ......._.._.__ _ .... ._ ........,....... .......,....._.„.m„__ , _ ... �.... ..._.. ,.-------..
l4.�-'b 3A FM 24� (1) C. Wolf'e to 345° E of'Cnle Ranch-}iunter Itnnch Arterial I$ 1.357.
.... A 10 �.. _...... S� ..—..... FM 2499 (2} ..».. , , ..3A5 E of C...�.� .�.�. a ,,. ,,. ... . .. __ -------- ..... .....u.0 ... . . ................
._...— .......
nle Ranch-I-lunler Raneh Arterwt tn lJndarwam9 (2) � I,A6T,2Q0
.... ___.._. � w....._.�.__ ..._� __...._ . ...,,�. � . ., .�.e....... .. ........�.... _ �. .. . .,. : �__...... _ w . ..
A-I1 SA �;ar6a^ If�.,umc Nw II; �WN �tk td"l C_nle Ranch N S SA to Cofe itanch-FHunter ILanch tlrter�al $ 7,§.i 7,Ot7(D
A-12 .............SA .......... ...N L'vefy(1}... � , �.,,7, ..,,, _ .e,� ......_._..._ ......... ........ ,�,a.a... ,.,.�,..,.e.�
� mm��M 25 E of'Seabrmn to 1,975° W of C VVoIPe $ 4,AG4„
.A-13 ......Sik .... .H Lrvelv {2y.. , ,�.. � ,... ,�.�. ....... ( 47.9..W�.of C, Wolfe to C Wolf'e ... ...��..., .,,,�,..�5 I 434,60Q
� fl-,➢4 , ... � �,SA4, ,,,, , , ,,,,, ,,,, , ,�,�FI Lrvely (3), �. _..._ . ......... ...0 4Volfe to John Paine(Und�rw�x�d.(J,..,,,,, ,,,, � ........ . .. . . �
2} $ (7,�94,600
qq�..1S �.,�,,,,,�.,�, ....I....��.,... .�Hunterftanch�Artenal�..�.� ____ , ._.._._._ .�__ ....-._Hunter[Lanch�N SCoINI...loBrushCreek ,.�....��.. .. .� ......�_� 17,438,000��
..........�.. ......... ............... ....._.... ......... ......... ......... .......... ,..... ....,...,,,. , .. . .........__......._..----._.. ......... ............._............
h-Vf PA F3ruch Creek (I) Hunter Ranch IV-S CoI Pt2 ta 1-35W 4� 25,�FSS.,d7t1Cl
���.,_.._ ...... ........ ...._ ..-------- . ......... ._....... .....------....... ................_ ................. ......,,,.,� .... ....,.,,,,,,Y,......._,__..,._ _., ..... ............... ...... .................
A-i7 SA Fd RoF�on F�M 2449 ta F[. Livel $� 4,762,W0
�,..g ......� ._..... ..�.�; "�1'r�lfe......... � . ... ... ,,,,,, ,,.�...,,_ _.I`�riri ,crle�LCrll"'PvY2�lN) .............._.. ......... ... ,..� m 3,�811"i.50t7�.
Q"
v�„�i A-.2a ..'.���.� w ..,,.�.. �...,._.Col Kanch`N-S�SA.. ., ._...... �. ........� ...,.....,�.w.......,,�.�.,,..._T mC IelloF{,Lsve� ......._ .,,.....�..._ _.... .$,.. m,17; W,O(Xi...
. ...A �� ..�. , ,,. , .,,� �. , ... .n ...�._ .,.n_. . ,_.__. ....... ......_ ...... ------ ---.._.._ ...------........ .............. .......... ......... .. .... ---'------ ---------
2f PA Cale Itanch-}[unter Ranch Arterwl Amyx to 1-iun(er itanch ArPer�a! � 32,915,QW �
,.....�..��,....... ....�.�.. ��..,,w,n...,m.,.....A.,,Fu(ureLoop�2�„ ,.�...,..._.,...__..,._.___.__..__�___.__JimChnstalfo4,96SS�..���,,....w......._.w...,,.. �.._,..�._._..__� -----._.._.._
„nFJim C;hr�stal � 1,345,800
._ _ ......... ...._.______.__ __._....____— .._........ P..(.....} ........... ._....... ......... � ,,,..,,,,,.,. ,,,,.„,.„.... .. ,_ ........ .__ _........... ............... ....
A-23 f'A Fu(ure Lsro 3 2G0' N of'forei Cole to F'M 244=J � 3,151,4Q(i�
...... �.,._. ._ �.. .. , . . _.,,_._. __.�. ..._ . w..
A F
4) 1 04Q W of Ainyx tn iJnderwcaod $ 4G3�1 W
A-24 .�.b� . _ ,,.� r.. ,uLUre I ooP �... , . . ,,.�_ , �.. .�.... M� ...,�._, ..,,,.m .......... ... ........... ....... °.............. .._....�. ... ,. ,,,....,,. m . ......e,m..
. - . _..� � ,� . ..... ,a.,.. a .. .�, ,... „ ., ....,._ „ „ .. 01 35VJ SBFR � I !Q➢,400 ���
A, 25 ...���.� w ............... � .. .PtrPr�ia^ A cr�r � Underwoc�d t�_....�,_.._ ........._. , ......._ _.,-_............�. . .......�,_..�
A-2G C" Jim Christal-'�'om Cale Colleetor Jim Christal to Tom Cole '6 4,Q75,OOU
m, . . . , , . .. .. e,,, . _ me �, �„e,e. _ _
.?V.�-'Y..7 SA�(I(2) Westwurt ........ ......... AnportioSpnngside .... � 2,9tr�E,C7tbt) .....
fi ��.7�4 . , j . � SA �ipJestcourtlUnde �..�� � � , ...m
. „ ,..�,. . e ...... ... . . .. .. _.., .....,,,.. ,.�. . .....,... . . . _ _ .a.......,_. ..._.._..__..._.. ,...,. . .
rwood Sprincside to I,7W' S of Sprmgside $ 2,234,00� �����.
....._._.__._.= ........--- -......_._._._._ .. ..............._ ......} ......... .............. ......... G,.,� .,,,,,,,.,,,, ,,, ....------... ...._.._...... ......_.
A-29 SA UnderwoacJ (1 1,T� S of S rin side to 2,655' P�l of��M 2�49 S4 1,677,W0 �����.
..._._._A-30 ... 9A � ..--CJruQde^ivde�cw.9 2 2.655' N �. .mm,�..�._.
�.._...---..._..._.__.._ �. _..._... _._...._. _._........... ,,.._...� ... . _ _._......._......_ ..
.......... ..... , .M....�
. Q Y of CM 2A49 to FM 2449 .$ �&;3f1:-0.C.b{�(7 ......
...'..... ......... m„�._.., .,,�,,., ....... ,.�,..a._.. .e ,,,,,,,,,_, _,,.. ........._........ ...... . ...,...,.�„�, „ �.,
. . ...__.,, . ���.
A-3l SA JohnPaine(Underwood (() FM 2449�[0 1,265' N oFH.. Livefy.. :E �,:36�,".iQC� '....
., ., ,...__ �.. ..,.... a ,. ......�. �. ,......,. . .. e . ..,... . , ....0 , , ..�, a. .,�,. .. m .� ...,...... _ _ _........_... . .__.._..._..._ .... .... . . _,. ......_
A-32 3A ]af��n iau�cCG7vic9e,���wcrocxi ('il 1,2tr5° N oFF{. Livelv to 470° M of k3rush Creek `G 9,(S�G,VbPX1 i
,e _.�.,. _ „ _,,,_ . ...... ......... ........._......... .... ........ ......, . _ .�,..�... . _......
Pa.-�':13 SA 3ahn Paine(CJnderwoal (3} �97Q° N of �rusli C'reek to Srusti Creek � 1275,W(} �����.
r4,�-:3� �.I'A�(2(3},....._,..._...,_.__,. .. 4Vestern.._.._.._ _..._..._._._ .._......_..._..— ......._.._ Jim�Christal(oA�.. .,._...,...,..m.m.,.,.,.,...........� ..._........_ ......_.._...___°.,,���
... ��..— irport $ T,2Q1, I
._�_A-15.,,.,,..,,.�_.w� _ ..:........... ___._...__ -� ]'rec�swn (t} . ....._�.._._ .._....._.U, Jun C'hristal to � ....,�.. .m..... _..m...a__-___�._,m�. ...—_ ....._.._.
_ _ ..____ . t.�7s�rvora.Rnort � c.rsu�s,u�in
.._....A-�� . ... ..� .._ ._..._._... ._.._ti' ea.i.,imv 12�._. ......_ . ,._..., . ,,,. _..,�..� w 1.775 N of A�r �rt to A' nrt .._...,. . ..,.. _ , , , . � .., l.� 75.A� .,....
_---
QX)t7
Scrvice Area Project Cost Subfotal S 235,473,300
2015 Roadwav lm iact Fee Shidv Cost Per Service Arca .� 55,300
Total Cost in SERVICE AREA A$ 235,528,600
a.
b.
These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and shauld not be used for any future
Capital Improvement Projecis wiThin The City of Denton.
These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Englneer for a
specific project.
2015 Roodway Impact Fee Study 27 January 201 6
City of Denton, Texas
� � �� �
Table 5.B — 10-Year 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP
with Conceptual Level Cost Projections — Service Area B
rf
� �� �����
i i� ' �'!� I
I
���. 3ea-v�ce Proj. N Claa�� 72otadwssy Limifs Cus9 en Serv�ce
p��� Ares
k3��1 C; Parvin F[i�;hland Park tu McCormick �� 2,R'ifa,ddf7
..��, .,,...�,�,.,...�......�,..._ ......---��-------------- ... ,........ .......,......,_..,._..__._ —_--- . , ..... .�.�..�. ... ..� ........�. .—.
H-2 5F4 Hobsan Counlry Club [o Teas6ey � 9.163,OOa
..__ � ...,.- ... ....�.._.. _ .� .. .. .. . . � 490' W of Bonn�e ➢rae to Fort Worth US, . . .. ..__.. __.._._
... ( 377} _ ���. $ h 197,189
k3...3 .,PA.,- _ .._....___ Vant��,c. ..,... ............... m, . _ _� __. —.— ... . .. .__. _ � � __.._ ...........,,
B-4 f' �:I I'�s,en (:ounlry Club io Helmont .:ti L,305,Od0
, ,,.. , , ,� ,.�.� .. ...� ..... �.... mY ..� . .. ,,.m,.. .......,--- ...�� ,,..�,°�` �,....„ .,.%',__..� ...,.,,,._____ �..� ........
.... --- .. 46'�Er9d(Y6
B-5 .._.`�A R arc 4"atanl �"hebto Cc..as�Cc '6.,... ... ,......._..
.......w_._ . ........................ .......... ._. ......�.�..._�.- � --- -----.._ . . ......... ,.., .,. ........ ........ . . �.—..-----_,. � �',........�.. .. µ�
%3-6 SA (1/2} 7iobmson {1) I 7rastep lrr )20 L arf°1Nhc�ler kiad�e S 2,38f,,,,, ,,,,,,
�-7 ,SA. (1t2) Robinson (2} 175' E of Berkfev to 315' E aF State Schcxri Rd '' $ �FS42.(Ml(3
Si
..'g .......0 (1(3} ,�,...... ...e.. .._�'�seC<d�a[e(M� .... ...... ... ....,.�,...... a.ft�aetiY�tf�QDS.ofYtyarx .... . ..... ..... .... ba.. , �,ga:�.
���-9 C: Crecica9aPc: (2j I 660' S.. of Ryan to Thistle Way � 3,452,066
. .,...�,a,,, , , . ..._.. , .........- .... ....... ........... ........... ........ . ..,, �..,e . n....,,_ . . ....... ............. . .. ,. ,,, ,,.� e_., _...... ._
33-10 C(1!3) �recicr.{a!e (.3} Thistle Way to Ttiverpass � N fi7 C1dYJ
B�11 ,...,."_� _.__ ........__._.... C"ra.r,Ccrlute 4,.,,.. ,... .�.,.��,� _ ..._�...k;arfktivcrchase.7radta��0'1X/erfY'....�.... .. ,�......
--.. . ..... ... ......--- ,.._......---._ ......_ .............._.
Q } �B(7° +n�liccv $ i,5.51,a(}0
_ _._._.__..... ..... . _...... .....,: ,_ ,m.m„ „�,,,.,�,� , , ........._ .............. ..... ......... � ,,, , , ...,.,,.. ......_... ..........
B-12 �PA I IIrush Creek (2} C�.'iVd NI�DF°B�.. Yo�2,(710 L: vfJarken &�amc (Fut+arej � '7,336,6CP0�
H3-13 PA , ,,,,,,�, .,,,,,,.,SrushCreek,(3} ���........� �,��� ... 2016'Eof9ohnPaine(Future)POFortWort(US377} �,.,,,.,, ,,,76i7,OQ0�
6-14 PA Drush Creek (4) I ......... ..... Fbrt Wonh (US 377) to C;uun(ry Club ......... � 13.2`.7�.fX.10
6-15 .,...PA...,..�. m. Hickorp(reek(�� .. .._. ,_.. ,,.,, .... „ Csrn�... ....... . ..... . ,_:...,.�...,."..
�
,... ,.._, nPSVGluGfla&t¢vicexres __.... ,a . . ..... ...... .� ((}��14CYtY0
&!i..lEv PA Hickory Lreek (2} Ri� �� � � ��� � � ��� . . ���
_ .. � .._.�,., .. ,,.�,. �_ _
' verpass 4o Montecilo % i 6£GY,006
. ,„, -... . , . . ........ ., .... ........- --..._ .....
� 3 . .. .�.MonlecdoloTeaale ....�... . 6 .....775�&,OW
.... ..93-�18 PA�!/t '�.....__.. .._._Hickory�reek,C ) _,..._ .............. .... .s..,..,.._..�.,,. _��.e.... _ .._ y.._.a._.. ._ __ �...�..,,P...,,..._ ,...,,_ _
� .._.�_
�E i } ry (4} CcasPc�v tcr Nautic,al $........ :439,664 '...
ea+ - -�..19 PA (2(31 ............... Hickory C1ree...�.�. ...m......,, , ._ ......._._....._ ..._..._........_ . ........... ....... ..,,..
. k(5} hdactUcal ta & nn ti 7A6 f100 ���.
..._._5-20 .._._PA ..... . , .w,.._. Flickorv Creek.. ..,..m........._._.,..... _. _ _--- . _.._.._.._..._ _..,_. . _ . m.,,,, _ _� - .._ .
_.._..._._.
(6� � Erm to Sfate Schcx�l Aoad (Future} � 87S 000 �..
,...., �a,� m.,, m.. ...._.: ..........---- .,. �„ ,,......,... ...._.._. ......_ .,.,,..... .,. e;.,....,�,.
F9-21 �C; John ]'aine-Fort Worth Collector lohn Paine to Fort li�orlh (US 377} � `.6 .l.fil5,Od0 I
Fi,.�22. . �..�..0 . ...,..�.�. . ,����.��...�JohnPaine______..._..._..._.._ .._._...__..._ ... .Vintagetol3S'NofAlhens_.._..._.._ _..._.,,, - .$-,,. " 11215�000'�..
.�...1D23 "s.h ........ ....... . ..�3ortrrieHrae(A} ......... „.�e,_,,,.. .,.,... .43SE ....... ......... .,,,...,,,,w.,,.,,,,,,,....
Sf3Fft ta Vinta�e $ 1 f,900,433
,. ._�i �.7�G .. .�� . . ........__� _._.. F3crnnie k�G�ae (.r}, ...... . „w�,,,,. .,..... ..,m....- Vmtage �to Fart W ._,._,_� ) .._... „ , ,.,w.. ._.m.,-.m..,. ... _. .. _.. ........_._..._._..._..,
� � J ,v orth US 377 $ [i,346,(bCYO
8-25 .._.G� ..._ .. H .. .. . ...._�. . ���. ..,_. 130° ".v af'JJrlloeuerc P 4er ltosu9awe.°._.,_ _ _ _.._ �..���.�. , � ,. .....
_ . � �
iuhland Park ±.OHi,G00
..f3-26 1'!4 Fart 4l�orth (US 377} .._ y..�75E tcr S S;ity C,irnits �� 9,Q79,�(X}.�
........... �.,.,. a �. ,.... . .........._ „e , . ......., ..........---- .,.. ,.
} ._, .�y Worth (US 377) lo �rush�Creek (Realigned) � 3 h84 Fi(70
f3-27 �SA FM H836(1 Tort..,,.
.............�.,.,.�.. ,,...,. ....�,.w,,,�......._.........,.,_. w„�...,�... M.. �..__.._.._.,.._._ .. ,,, .., .. ,..........P..
6-25 SA FM 1836 (2} Cowtry, Club to Hickory Hifl ����.. � 2,711,000
..��,;�?,„, �.,�'�` ._._._� ..._.,_.C�unWGluba , e,. ... I m , _ ... .m.,,...FM1830,(Reihhned}toySCiryLunrts._., ,,,.,.._...._. .,___',.� 9964_C�YO...
f3-3CD f.' Ofd Altcrn-Flickory Hdl Collector C31d Alton to Ffickory FCill �.. $ �,➢GQ,000
_._B _31 . � ,.... ..,...4 e ,..,... , .R.�an G°rcel<dalc �'arl]�c,tcr¢ _.. ......._.. � I_.._._..._ _ . .. ..._._ ,�Ryan Ler C ree,kd,.nlc, ._.e._ ....�..,, . �_�....�. � �'.,...._ , ..7 6i(7m000..
E§���T PA '&'ca Ic.v Sundown to S C f irrr�CS .ti i.2a0CYJ0 �
--_._..._. __ �.._..._....- --..... ,�._ _.�.,.,. , ...,_.,..A.,�.._..., ...._,_ ....._.._..._ ._..----....._ _.....,.,. , ..�.,. .......,q..,.__. __ ....... . a. ,......_, ,�_ ,.,... ,...a.
f$-3i SA F3rinker (2} 1-3SE NBFR to Windriv�r $ 5,15G,000
Scrvicc Area Projecf CosYSubtotal S 174,645,222
2015 Roadwe Im c[ Fce Stud Cost PerService Area I$ 55,300
Total Cost in SEIiVIC`� AIiEA 1� S 174,700,522
a. These planning level cost projedions have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should no� be used for any
future Capital Improvement Projects within the City af Denton.
b. These planning level cost pro�ections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for
a specific projecf.
2015 Roadway Impac4 Fee Study 28 January 2d1 6
Ci9y of Denton, Texess
�� � ��� ��
Table 5.0 — 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP
with Conceptual Level Cost Projections — Service Area C
i, �� -
°�
� ��
������
��
'�. Service proj. N �lass Roadway Limifs Cost in Service
Area Area
C-1 SA ��� Milam ( I)��� I-3S SF3CR (0 175' E of 1-35 Nf3FR $ 2,SG1,
�-2 ... ....R3Fh .. :.. ......... .....,Milam (2}..�M....... _ ___� .�..,.._._. ..__I7S E of 1-35 NBFIL (n FM 21G4 (Loc....... .... . .. . .......... .. ... __ _.... _ ....._._...
ust} $ 8,i36,SQQ
.. , . _ . � �..... � . ...ot"Nlilam R:..... e to HCtD..N-S Seeonda".. ."_.°...._.... .. _.._.._...._ ....._........_......
.,. �-1� Q`. �obcat......._ 1,165 W... _ . �
„,..� ,�....,.e... . ._......._. ............_
rclg ry ARer�al � 2.632..CMM)
�.�...........,........_.................... ......... .................. ..........- —��----..... ......_..... ......... . ..... ,,, ...,,,,...........,,..__. ...._
C-4 PA Csaiver ?30 eYJ af �a.r.u¢aP En I��"uCUrc (.rnci�y � 2,724,SQ0
.�G, 5 . . . ��.� 7'A � .,_,��.�.,..,UanzcrlLon � I --�..�.� � . _625' VV oFl3S S6Fft to 3S0' 6 aP 4�3.5;:.���. ,...'�,._,_ _�_ � _.._�
, , ,.m..... .,. .. .. .------ - . .
' � ( ) V NF3FR $ 3 529,(Xl€}
,._-----.r.._.__—._ - �- � �------ _�....... ...� . .........��... . ....e..� .............a,.�, .. ...,,
...,.... .. . �..._...µ..�.,,�. . _ ..m. ._ ..... .. ...
�-6 SA T.,:._^m_ Cmn�r/Lonp; (. ) o FM 2164 (Locust) � 15 614
...___._.�.. .___ . _�.._._� . ........................._ , � a.. . ,,,... � C'raiuzr 1......�..,�m..... _..m.� — . .....�_,..� ,,..,_. . „
C-7 __ 4 �erthold Cindy Cn[lector m m r m n e 6ar4hold to 1,235' W of Cincty (Fumra} q � Y,242�W6
C-8 C Masch Branch-1-35 CoIleclor 1,295' W of [-3S to 1-35 .� 1,603,000
. ... . ...�._ .._,m .....,.. .__ . . .....,.....�.,,..._m_..._.,...,.,.
C�'J SA � HOD�L bU Secandarv Arteru�l (I) HOD M S Se�ondary Arterualto $4(}' E of}�OD N� S Sec�ndary Arter�ai '�. � 1,2�G,(700
..�...., .. �....._. ..... ... ... ..... ...� ...r_.._. _--- --...._ _....._ ............. ..... ......... ......... —
(:-10 SA HGD E-W Secrandary Aeterial (2) &SO' E of NOD N-S Secondary Arterial to 136' C of Donn�e Srae (Exstinp�) ''���.. � 1,44T,
G�l I SA ..... iiOL7 L-W Secondarv Arter�al (3) �_ ,_ _...,,.._._._. 1�d IC tsf�lAas.�nie Clrae (�'x�;tmp�D tsr N I� Il ih (I.,ouia., m.,,,.." ,-_._.--
4l ...... � 20,446,CH}t}
�,.,.,� ,�,..,P.. .._......_ _..... .. ,.......... .._ ................._ ........ . _. .,,�.,.., .. _...,... ........ ......_....... .............................
C-12 PA HWY I 173 ( I) 466' E of'Masch BrancFi (Ex�stmg) Pa �75 l: of f3arthotd (Future} .$ 4Q3,9(10
. . ..��_.,� m....., .�� .,.._,... _._.,._ ,___—FfVJY f (73 (2) --�------ .................. ....,...... Cindy to 1-35 SB['R ...... . .__._ _ .__._ ....$..._ �.�.,�„
_.......... ................ ........... ...... .........._ ......... ,,.. , ,.,....�., . ......__. _.........._ , ..,,., „ ,�,,,,...,.,,�,
C-14 PA ( f(3} �Efm (US 377) [-35 NBCR to Elm/L,ocust Couplet $ (,OT5,000
.. ------ ....... �.. .,�,.... .. .e.�.. _ .,..A � �.., . . ............ ......._.. ..
C-I S ...._—...0 ................yI�P�,rr�ule�g 115' E of Nnrth omte to I.�usl 6.�� �� �m�..�.�•P
. ......_._ P . _. ._ . .
1,'166,660
.e,..� .. ., .>...,,,, .........._ ......---- ---...._.._.. ........... ........ ,...u, ,,,,,,,,.. „ _. .,- __._
GIG �SA West�,ate (E-W) Wes(�ate (N S) to Bonnie Elrae � 4,353,OW
... C.17 .....G ....... . ,a,� .,......R��,�.., µ......_ .,......._... . ..._._.._..---.. ...._.._.__.._._ . . _._._...._ ........._ ........ _ . .....,.......,... .. , __. __ ,. �_._...
- eY (I} CSr�na�iir; �li au I.a q')0' "VJ af l?Irn $ 1.381.IXK1
,.w.�.m.,.....�.,..�..� .e..... ...,I,...��...�..._,_... ,��........,...��..._n,......r-.,.m ..._.......e-...__.._ _ ---... ...---- ...__.._.�_... ...... ....,.... _ ...............�,....,.,...,m .,.,,.,,m�,�_...,..a...,
C-I$ C I Riney {2) �790' "i?U aFl" Ixi7 Pr� I I��A �' 1,2�.:§,CJtlfl
. �.a._..,.....� .� ,..,. _ e. . ,__�__ _ .. _.__....._ . . "------.. ...—_.._. ................._ .... .. ..., ,. , ...,�. , .,, .... _ . ._,. .. _ __ ._.._ .... ----.._ . ........_._......_...
°-�I'3 5!4 Iwasch �ranch H-35 Second�ry Arterial Masch DrarECh to ]-35 SBFR $ fQ,7fr7,IX10
. ..,.,...m .... ............ .... .a._,...... .m.__ .. ._. _ _____ . .. . , __ ........�.._ . . ,._.... . .. . m.�. w ..... ......, .. ._......A.,... . ,. _ . .�.. ,., .....__. . .._... . , ,._.._.........
�°-Zd SA Jim Chr�stal (1} A90 C rf C\7V'ol% ka.� 7"hcn�e�ar., J. E�:uK�a $ 3.75�z500
. A..2�._C 2( SA , _ . ... , , . Jim Chr�stal (ll .. ....m .. ...........W.. . . . _,,,..,.,225 E of f uture_Laap �o Mnsch F3ranch .... ,.........m. . . ,.� .. ...,,..3�4GC�.5(1Ck...
A-3, C'-'L2 PA Jim Christal (3) Masch 6ranch fo Scripture $ �.S9G.500
..�. ,C_23 ... �........ ..� ....... .... ....�,,,,� . .�,.m......,........� .�.---- -- ---- _ ,.., . ,� ..,........._....� ...___. _
SA4 Nad(1) C7iuvcisilvt.arL,�hCP°,5¢af"dJivve,isil:y $ (,S}8,5(M}
..,... _ w ........... . ......... . ..,,.. , ..,�. , ,e .., . _..�.e. .. ... , —, . ......... , ._........._.... , , .......... ............ ..�....� , m .. .,,.,...,.. . P a . ..,.,.. ... ._,..,.-,..,.„,...
G24 SA4. Nail (2} 'L,24G S of'University to Jires f;hristal � 3,506,600
,,,,,,,,,_ _. .__. , .. _._....._. ..........__ ,,,,,,, .,,,.> . ... .........._ ........---- �� ---- ......._._ ............ .....
�; 2i G; Thcxnas J Epan (1} 55S N of Universrty tn S50° S of University $ 1,27�,(XYO��
i .26 �G Th..�,. __ .� ., ..... ..... .. , , ., ....._ _.�.._ ,_„_ .._. . _
., .. ,..... _ . . ,m..,.
� cxnae J Egan ,2) 550 5 of Unrversity ta Jim Christal '.�' d?99 t10ECJ
.. .., . ,,,,,,,_. � e,. _ � ..,,,,..
.� G27 PA Pulure Loop (1} Unrversity ta 745' N of Jim Chr�tal '� ( 31G4Q0
� ......_...._.._ .........._... ..........._ ............ . e ,........:. , . , ...... .�._ . . w �. ..,.... . e _ ..,,.,, e. _ . ......._.._.. .__ . . ...... . �.. _ ,n.m. . . m..,.. ,..�
G28 PA Masch IIranch (li 1,290 S of HWY f 177 to Miller $ 3,4dA,OQO
.. �„ , , ,,,,,,,, , , , _.......... ....._.......--- ................ .. w .�,,. _
C.-i9 .[�A .............. Mdsc�� I'#�xi7ch (7y ......... 895° W of°Puture Loop to i,255 N o£Universrty � 5455,
I w . , ,.. . ....., a. w . ...� . , ..,.�.�.. e, ... m .......... � .�. _ .........a __ _.. __...._..._ . _ ,. ._........_.... _ ._........ w ,.�_ , m, , , . .... _,.. _ _ _ _ .._.. _._ _ . , ..... ,...--
G3U F'A Mascft Qranch {3) 1,2SS' N of University to�Jim Christal '� °:�„226,QCYJ
. G'.,�3( ._ ,....5 .. ,.�..,.n.,._.... ._..�.,,..........._�.�...m„�..:..,.mv___ .w�....,__ ..._. .. ...__......_._ ........ . . .. .... ................, ...,....,,.,. ,�.._..,....�_ ..._.. ..___..__.
A L.oversL•ane(!} ELWY1173ta325'N�ofPruth � ➢,OS9,OQ0
..'...... ..., ...._....__. .. .., . .........m _............_ ......_........_ ........._ ........... ......, ,,, ., ,,,,,,,, ,,, ,,.,,.,,,. ...�...._„....._._ .......... _ ...... , ._........... ,� . ....... ........
�:-3� SA Lovei's I.ane (2} 325 N of Cruth to 340' N of L.dtlebrook � 9,1 I'�,O(H7
.,...__.r...�_.._._ __ .�._.._.......__� _.._.___. ..__(..} , ..,...�..... e ............. �, .�.e,..__... �........,.. _ �...., __�_,.. ,.. .._._---- ...._ ............ ..
C-33 SA Lover s Lane 3 '§4(Y iV oC Ldtlebrook ¢o Flool. .� 333.,C100
.�_�4 ......�a _........._ . .-Lover s L•ane (4i ,e,. ,P ,.,....,,m ...n„_.. w . ..�.......... Floak lo Masch 6ranch 1-35 SA ........... . . . . �...., ... . . „..�,.. 4920,,........
C,'-3S ....SA , " Barchald�_�.. � ....... ...........,� ....,.wm _,_.._. _..__ ---- _.._.,�.. . .......�_.. �.w ,.,,�...._
_ ��._.... . ,.,.�.
Ganzer to City Limrts � 2,C 19,50�
�._,e,.,,. ,,..._,,..., ,.�..,,, �,����.. ,.,,.e,.,,.�, , ............ ........... . _......... _....._.__ .... .� ......... .. ......... _ ,.._...
-:?Ca SA Cu�dy (I) Giaiir�r 40 1„)�0 5 rrEQi;troui $ (AG7.SW .
,�,�37 . .,m....� .,� .�..,..m ....,..._..,.. ..�..,_,.....�.,,....r ........... . ..._.....---. ............_,. .._...... ...... , e.� ,.....,..,_ ......_.._... ....__........._...._.
�`- A Cmdy (2) IJ.��' S r�f G�vKar.�A� t�r M„rsals 1:�%r�rich I-35 C,;°irllwr,e�ra �i 3„i55,CN)(i
. . ........ .......... , ......__.. . . ........... ........... ......... ...._.. . ..,..,., . . , , , . ,.... . ...._.... _.......... ........... ........
C-38 SA Cindy (3} FM 1173 (Fu(ure} to I50' S of Future Le�op � 7,EiC44.,(M7(7 �
�_�, ,., ... _ _ ....,, . .. �, y _. , . . .. , , . . ,.`. . . � 0' N Qf Masch I3ranchd-._ , .szen .... , e ., `G,.. ., G 476�OW ��.
9 SA Cind (4} ➢•OS . . . , ...._ �35 PA to Tie., ,.,, t , .
C-46 rF�. Cindy (5} Tieszen to University � L.�%6X...(70C! '�.
. ............ ......... ........... ........... .. ... .. ,.. . . ._. . ........ .... _ .,,,,....--- . . _ .__._..._.. _. _.._.._ ........... ........ ............,_, ...�............., . ,... ,....,m....�
C-4( PA (7J3) Western (i) University to Jim Christal S 4,65QW0 �����.
�.�� e � . „ ._..� , ._ . , . . . ._.. .._ __ � .. _. e , , , �.m e _ _ _.
'-42 Q' Milam-Habcat C:ot Cv%iLasn Y� ldoP.r„at d�'udi�ccl � 2.,83�1�2,Q70(7 .......
.. ._�-�13 °.�`Pi . ,.., T-3Q�U N-S Secondary Arterial (.�_}_...._..... . ......._..._. .....__..... Milam�4o 226' S of . . , ........_,. . . .. � ......... .. . ........ ......._
.. �.ae, . �.n..
. ...,.... 6obcat � S(ld�,0t)n
m....µ..�.........,.. ,,...._ .__..._____ __ ___.__ ,w .,_ . ,,,,,..�. �..,....,...____ �._.__._ __�.._.
�; ��tA� ;iA HOG N-S Secondarv Arteriel (2) 2836' N of F.'Gn to kilm � 3,8'39,000 ''��.
_...---._..__ ._._...._.._.._ ....._._....._ ........ _ ... ...... ...... . . .., , ,,, , _ ....._.. ,
C-45 SA &-0.piif.ap;eTr�d. .. . . Universi(vtoScriplure „ .,,, � 6.2��90i1(l ...
� ----- �....._......._ .. ............ ..----. _ ,..�.. , , , . ., ......... . . .m .... .. ,.,.,,. ...._.�,...�. ........ ......._ .__ ___, _.._. ..._ , _�, �... e..._, . ... ._.._. , . _, . . . . ,_.. .
G46 1',4 PBr��anie F4�rec (1Y I Mdam (n L,aap 288 EBFR $ 3i,9�O7.P!067 �
C-h7 SA .... Bonnie Arae (2. ..... .... Lcro L87%C�iIDI^N2 Ua L'6f1....i+C Qrl C&.ure.� ,m �.... $..... 3 6(}3,OW ''.
. �... . . ,..,� ,.. ,�.....e,.w..,.....�. .,.,..7.. . _, .� � _ . ._._. ._..._ � � : ... .... .... ........_ . _, _. . . ,_,_._, ...
�.:-�B,A:i I�& �....... SA rionnie Srae (3} Universiry la I-35 '£ 2,97'S,NOFS ..��....
,a ,.� , .,. e , .... .... ..__......... ......... ......... ... ........_.> „ ,,..,,, .,,,,,,,, _ ........ ........._.... ....... ...
G;-49 C: �Fallmeadow I, �C40' S of Meadow Ed};e (o Crardenview '�� fri10,(N10
C SQD-44 � ..F'A, _ ..._...._ .FNY 2164 [,acust.._ 1 . .......... � � ..... Cd Limi4s to L.00 2.,,. _ . ..__........ , _ _.._...._...._._, .......... ..
,....... .mm.,_....... __ .......... ,
i )�) Y P 88 W6C'ft $ ,"„.itl°D:f4U�
G51.D-45 .....PA . _..._....... C�`M�21(r4(Lc�cucl}(2} ........ ....,,e,,,,,,._ .. Loo 288iR(6CR�tc�Elm ........ .. .. A.. �,0'i('s,�FY,M4
Servicc Arca Project Cosf Subtotal � 218 065,408
2015 Roadwav ImiactFee Studv CostPerService Area � ^ 55,300
Total Cost in SERVIC� AREA C� 215,120,708
a. These planning level cost projedions have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any
fu�ure Capital Improvement Pro�ects within the City of Denton.
b. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determinaTion of the City Engineer for
a specific project.
HOD: Hills of Denton
._............ �._ ...................... �......� � _ . .m.m....... �
2015 Roadway Impact Fee S
tudy 2C, January 2016
City of Denton, Texas
�
�� � �
Table 5.D — 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP
with Conceptual Level Cosf Projections — Service Area D
„
�J���i�
� �s
,
�����e Proj.t! Clfass Roadwey Limils ��+s@��e�rvise
'�, ........ ....... ...... ...
D-1 �; FM 2164-f3ritlany Hill Colleclor (I)���� 1,605' E of FM 2CG4 to 745' W of Mesquite Rid�,e � 2,60.3,(700
D,_2 . .........� . ........ FM 2164-Brrtlan Hill...,.. . .,. _... .. a� , m.,...._..._.._ ............. ..._.._.... ........ . _ ..... ,..�,...,._. _, _.._......_.._ __ ._.._..._...._......._.....
y Colkclor (2} 74:r"VJ crC I°�esqttifle IY.�dgc to Mesquite Ctidge $ 395,SW
., ., e„..a . w .m „Y _ ... _ ( � .. _ _-_ __ q�e.,,,b e ...."�' . e._.. .,,. __ --
I3-3 C FM 2164-IIriPtan FIJI �olleclor 3 Mes urte Rid e l0 6rd(a Flil! � 2,115,W0
M,�-4 Sh F'M 2153 (Iteali�ned} �'ce.y L,irnit> ta fr2(}' 4 crf `�osnecsel �$ 2.2f 7.466
��"�.�5 , ..PA ........ FM 2164FM 215'i (Reali ed} PA �..�.., Ff� 2164 (Loc,�� � ..__. .._._ ..._ .._. ..
,. ..�,..,_ ...... �---
t3.. �.p usi} fo Ind�n Wells (Fuwre} � 8426.OQG
D.. � _ _.. ��M 2153 Rea ........ .,...... .��, .. . �.� ...._.n .,.�. .. �-..� � ) ..... .. , . � . .. . ... .. ...........
_ _ ( Lgied} 1'A Mes ude Rid,�e (�u�ure} IoFM 2153 (ftealiµned $ 18496600
G PA I FM 2164-F
D-7 SA. P'RM1 21G4-FM 2153 SA (1} I FM 2164 (Locust} lo Indian Wells (Future} '��.. $ 7,593,(i00
D-8 ...._Sh. _ ...,_ FM 21 Fi4-FN➢ 215�....� _ . .......... . . . . .. �..e . .. . ..........._- � --......._..._ ...._..... ......�,. , ,.m A m .... .,,, ......... _ . _ ........,...........
3 SA (2} 540' E of Cireen Valley (Fu�ure} to FM 2153 $ 7,G17,000
........ ........ ... ....._ .......... �..... .. ,..---
U-9 S"A ......... ........ She rd .... . I .. �.. ....... .. 1 496 W of FM 2153 Po FM 2153 ,� ...... .. $..... 2 265 OW
w. ..._.._. _. ..... . _....�..... .......�...e .... . . ........_........�.� ...�,�... .. . _.._... ...,�....._.m_...___ _._.__ ._._ ._ ._....,,.._,_ __ . _ . . .._.... ..,�. ..�. ,..� _m .._ .._ __,_�..,__.
... .. ,. . . , „ , � , ,� . _.._ . . . , , . , eutai ro G ribbl€s � prvi�r�:; .. . _ �i � 7 0.71,000
.. O1 d) 10 ,m., m � ...m .,Q.rccbbk, S rmre s C ha ,rri,an Q. alluctor ._......._._._ 63Q N or C?M 2154-PriPtarrV Gfdl 6'0l9„ .... .. ...... .... ......- ---- -.._ ...... ......._._..........,
I�M 21fi4-Srittany Hill Colleclor ta
e(1) 5 2,431,000
esqwte fti g
_ PA
Y7-11 � ........ M..... .. , ,., „ 400N oFFfd,.,2164-FM2159...fRealiw'ied� .
, , , , _ _ ....... . . e.,,, _ ._., .. . ...,..... ......, .,_.....
D-12 47 Mesyuite Ridge (2) 400 N' oFFM 2164-FM 2153 (Realigned)1'A lo g 35G,500
.„ 470 S oFFM 21fift FM 2153 (fteali,�ned)_i'A
D
,13 , , , .,.., 4 ._. .......... ^ , .. Mcsqudc kuJk c.,(9) v_._' ' ...�...� 17005 S of MFM 2�164 FM,2153RRe I � e)d) PA ... .__- ...$..W ��_�,.
� T9.S' S of FM 755 S of S ov�y t�r �—
-14 SA �rdtany }iill (1} � 9� S,Er2QOCH} '.
. .,.... . .. _... , ,....�.... . . �....,... ,.. . ... .164 C M 21 i3 (Nt�n6�nud}, �'� . .
, ..e.......m„ ....,.... _,,.,,,._.. ..-° ----..._ ... .. ._._ ... .... .... . .. . _,...__.. , ....._._._ .. _..._..._._
U-15 SA 6rrttany Hill (2} 795' ,S ofF'14�1 2164 F"M 2153 (4�ealrgrred} C'A Yea g 080,506 ...
77Q' IV of"C!U 2Y(r4-1'Rh 2i53 SA,
(.�e� ve ,ee�.� , , , ..e__. .......... .. ,,,,,>.,,, ,�,,, ...... ....... ... _
D.-1G .....�' ......... ...C�M 2153 I ......... C'itv 4,imils to Bur�er (S} ......... $ I,G69,206 .....
�_�17 .,.� . ....... ...FM 2I53 (2}�� . . ..... . ..ra. .. ,_...r ._. . _ .. ...._...- k�ur e..._.._ ......_... .... . .. ....... m,.....�..... ,._�,.. . .__�,_._.__
.. _ g r Ycr k�M 2Y 5:3 (Ite^ali�ned} $ 250,G00 '...
m �,�..., . �..�.� , . _....... . ,... ............... ��-------...._... ......... ........ ..... , , m. ,. ., „ , .., ............ .............. ......_..
D-18 I � F'M 2153 (ReaLhned}-FM 2153 Colleciar w'R�S 21."r3 �(4ie;rli�;rred) tc� F M 21'r3 $ 3,�&16,(700 ..'..
, „ ,,.;.. .,, � ... . . ........... ._.„..,......,..,..,,,.... _Q_j . . __..-....-�--- . ._._._.........._ ............. . .......... ,,,..y„ .,. y _ .,......._.. ... ...... ......._. ........_.._..._ ...................._....,.
�6- 9 SA. FM 2153 3 G20' ;s aiSorr�zrsu4 ta Sk��.rrrwn 4 69^),400 �
.._...._.... ........._ _.......... ......... ............... ......... _,., ,,,,,.e.,.„. .., m,..,.e , .... .-�------- . ... ,,, , ,,.. ,,,.
D-20 SA. Carean ValleY (I} Vdarschun la $GO'�5 oF4l�arschun $ I.Q6'�,000 �''�
� ..� D 21 .,...._.^SA . , ....._ GreenValley(2)_ .,...� .. ... ..,._ . ....,,... ..8G0 SofWarschun�to.Sherman..._._ . .... ..... �..,�...�. m...29r�i�OW,..
d C)�-22 SA .. .IVBiLam (.3} I�:M 21Ci4 (Locust) Yct 605' E; at"k�M 21Cvi (LociasP) .$ E�7,df}CI
� ,...., , ....... m.�.� w..��.. .. ..,.mm,...........,........_ ._ ..... .... ._.....__. . . ._...._... , ..... w . ....�..�., ..a..�. e. , ..._......____
r3-2'§ Sl�. .�....i3c�bs;yt (:3) f°'CVl 21G4 (L,acust) to 51.'i' E: oC{�M 2164 (Lcrcust) $ G2➢,000
�' , .� .r..,_......_..� .._ ..._�__ �__._.�,...�a�,.�,_e... ......... w��,,, ,,, ,,,,,,,�,e,,..w.m.....��,. .,.--.._ .�...�.. ...�._.�..
..2�k µ.. ,. `�Po Coo r Creek (1} 86C} W,afiiartlre f'ar� i C oIl�cPar P� I ta k-iartlue ➢ �eld $ 17427,606„
13��x5 SA Cooper Creek (2) � Fdaitlec F'icld ta Ur�ivnrsity � 15 731 IXi0
.,..��2�._P...e.._,�,�_. ..,._6oldenCircle._ _.._ ._� }iartk,eField(Eu(� , ....m,.m. _ ... ., �...w.. .,�,. �.... . .._._...,w
_, . _...._ �.
ure} to Hlrllee Fiefd (8xistinq} $ 7,476,W6
........... >A k§artlee E�irlcE (I) .,,,,,.., ,,, I^I�9 1164 O,ocu�...__ .......... ....... .. � ...,... , , ,a..�.�,_
......._.... , ........
�-27 2 ......... ,t) to .�',�JO' F_' of FM 21Cx4 (Lacust) � 656,000
..�..�2EE ......_...SPti ...........� FParttze W ieYd..2 . . � ,.�..... � ,. ���.��. � .�.iuest Cit Limits to 575' E�of Wtlodland�Hilf ...,.� . .`C���� '�,279,GCft7,.
� ' i) Y
.`..... ._ , ,....� ,.�.,�me..v.ee,.. .....�.. ........... .......... ,..,..,
D-29 �; Callins ......... C'cwper �.;reek 4o C;atlins (C^:xistin�;}...... , .,.,. � �,�}ru�
.,,........ , , ...... m, a,._. A ,,, .w.,.,. ,. ,. ....... .... ....e.�.,.m.__ ...._.._... �.........._..__, . ........... ......_.... ,,,...e,.m„ ,_. ..._.,,_ ,_., ..._......._ .-,-..............._...__.�
tJ��30 �' Lon�, (1} rM 2!(ul (Locust} to 525' H of F'M 216A :� 431,�60
.., ......... . . ..._,,,,�,�_ .._......... ..._......— --..:._......--- ......._._... ........._ .,., �...,..m, , , . , ..�, ...__.._._...__ ............ ... ....... ...
D-31 Q Long (2) C�ly L,im�ts io Sluart �.... 1,G5B4O00..
... ,D_3�, ......,,� . _ _ .,....._._,.. �_ ..,......_FPartlee (,��._...._ , _......._..._ ........... � _.�..Sherman 40 480' W oP Woa{land�h[ill.... ......... _ ,� ... . .... ...
2.129.000
........_... ................. ,,,.., ..��������.» . _._....... ...�..,.�„ ,,,,a _„_ ......_._..............
U-33 t' �Fiartlee (2} �48(Y W af Wcaaxlland Hill Yo F[artlee Field :fi C�3,OQ0
.....�.. . ....... . _.... ......._ _ , ...... ..,�,,...� ..,.�, ,...., ...._... ........._ . _ ............ � ..�.... . ., ..�..�, .,,...�.�.._... _...........�_
D-34 4:: f ane�r We66lo Pcnt (9nk (Fulure) � 3.4'26,CIW
,,,,... _.._.� „ , e ........ . . ....... __ ... ....... __ ......_... .. .�.,.,,,, ,,, ........ ..._..._ ._.......
D-35 C' Kines-Windsar Colleotor ......... ......... Kin�;s Row io Win�isar � 356,0(}(7
. .��6 .. .,,,..� ..,.��,n..� , . ,._.�_..,Windsor_..., , ....,._._ ...._ ._........._... ............ �tOF:af..... ....�a.e.ww......,,_... _ ,...._........ ..._.___..._...._._
Saisxls la (�cxrGier �reek `.6 Cr.695„60{}
„�.�..,.�._. ,... ..� ... ............... .._,....,m.... aa�,.....,...,m,�m..,....-..�.- ._. -�,..a... ...��.,_�.,, ,.�.,. �. _,_. . . ..........,,�_.,...�.,,.�__ .....___._-._._ �.._.. ._.,...
f) 3T SFs Minao (2) Univer.ity te� I.aney $ 101&� WO
,._D�38..�_.......P.A_ ..,.._._...... _ ......PostOuk�)��....0 _ ._......� .....�......,.,. .�_,. ,.._...�.. .r..�........_.... � , ....... __ . ............„...�
CRy Lunifs fo Universil � 24.TT4,Of14)
.._.—,�... �- ---._.._�_ ..,.._._�_a�.,,�.....�.._� � _ ��_�,.._ ��..._ .....,..,..��___._......_._.__ _._._...._...�, ,,,,,,,,,,,,�...__... ... ...,._..w.m .�........
D-:i9 �' f.leerwqod. Flartlee to fr&G N rsfl6inp,s kaw 9� 3."i�F`J,CI00
_ i�..4�.. .� . , ... . F[artleeC,rao rCb .. ,....._.. ,.�„ ....._.... ,_...._........_ ._...._...._ ...... ,.,,...,_ �,.,�,n .,... m _...�...._... ......._......_....._..
pr.,��lt(i kCartle�;F'teldtoC'oo�>erC.ieek � 2,736,0t)(7
............. ............... .... .. ,,,�.eee.... ,,,,... ....._. , _ ........_._......__...... ....... .... ,,,,,,,,,.,, ,,, .,,,._...... .__ _...---
Ce-41 �; ......... f teertlee C,�wper Cal f!'% �-Cartlee I�celd ta f`aQr�r �:'rer;k ... 9� 3,414,W0
, ..m_ , ,. .. �n., , „ . e.,_u , . .....,. � _.._..... _ . ._..._.._ .......... ......... . ....,. , , Pw . ... . ........... . ........_ ....... . ....... ...._
I)��42 YA Sherman (.C} L,a;u�t to C,aop 268 Wd)f'R 4 i,7G�a,ZQO
...Ct-93 PA..... `9"hc,rman(2} -------- .. ...... I.acrp2R&W13fEd.Yo.,.,. ,,...._ ... . ......-..... ....... ...
. ........... .......,-,-..._.._ _ ........... , Y ---..... � ....
C°ifl C,irnifls � 8,54.5.IX7
C-SO.D-44 �--�f'A ......... FM�'l.IC>4Q,cwust}. ....._...e P.�,�., . , __.. ._, ,,, ... . ...,_. ._. . ...,_. , .�_., , , ..,_�..,,.
(I) �:cty f imits tod.ewp28A WE1F'FL � 2.3t'3,`�Q�
--....._ .._..----- -.....- ---..._.......—.. .......�.. .......... . ,,,.,,,...� ... ........... .......... __. ...---._._ ........� . .., d,,. ..,....e...,....,..�
... C-S I.D 45 FA , E'M9 21G4 (L,ociast7 i2) C.00 2S8 WF3CR la Flm � lol5G,400
ServiceAreaProjectCostSub[ohal S 210,671,900
2015 RoAdwaV Im racf �ce Sfudy Cost Per Service Area :� 55,300
"�'1M4�Y1 ��"�A�Ci�� �B°.�Vv"��L°��, r11��i��� 1.'Y S 210,727,200
a. These planning level cost projedions have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any
future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Denton.
b. These planning level cost projecTions shall not supersede the City's deslgn standards or the determina�ion of the City Engineer for
a specific project.
20] 5 Roadway Impact Fee Ssudy ������.........�3.� .....................���.��� ._.._.._.._.._......�.�-.....J�anuary 207 6
Ci4y af DenPon, T�xas
� � � �� �
Table 5.E — 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP
with Conceptual Level Cost Projections — Service Area E
J � Il��.r,
� lY�
� � 1
Se�°v�ce Proj. H Clsass 4taaeadeva�y Limils C€asfl �n Serv�ce ���.
As°esa A�esa
E-1 SA Min4o (lY .. . . �4'�"r NF: crf &�ell ta ilrsrvrrsatY _........... .......... .. . .. � 1:�.406,(7Ut7
..._ .... ,...... ..... „� > ..w,.m, .. ,.,. --------_....--- �.....a..... ........... .. .�... —_ � ...,.__ __ �._._m__....
&;-2 �; ��Q,attinacrre Ruclde0 to 47S E of Ruddell $ 807,000
�_�.r�� . c e,... Audro �_ ... B:oyfieldtoLoo�., ..., u_..
u ..... �.�..,.. . ,._ � W �..A... __,m �...�., , . m.�._ _ _�......
� .....,,p 288 i.�OS,OQO
N,,4 ,� � �„� ......�. .,�,.....,.��� ...__ ....�... ...„ .,...�...,m _.. MayhilltoLakevicw ..� . . ............. ....._�i.�..... 67f11,bH1Q..
,� � � ,'y ' . 8�.�,4(70
k;-5 S(4 McKinney (FM 42G Woarlrow tv t�'ast t"at i cnxits b �b,
,,.�� .. ... . . ....... . . ......... � ......... ......... ........�. ,.�.m.. ,..,.. _. ......... ......_...... .,w ., , ._.........
pa ��� G` &�uchcss ( I j Woodrow to 115' W of Tratlhead � �b Y7S 000
.F..7, _,C, (t(2} &'.PUCtress��(2}_.. .............. .,.._ � 715' W crf 1'r�aaB4�ear� to I,C1CY6.. ... ........... _. ..._....... ..... . ... ....
.n .�_..-- ---� �.e....__ -- : '
.. � ' trd ak' L.,�ap 2tiR `G I 197 Q(;0
.........._ .._...... .......... ._....... . ..... . . .. ..._.. , � ..__ _ .._......... , ,..... . .,,, m..... ........ . ..�.
E-8 t: �%rnse (& j �Jercwirow to ShaaEy C)xks .�. �.. 1 7(YCe 006
, �'�-�__._SA��(f/21 ..._. .,.. _�.�.Mna e(2) .... . m.m......,,,� .P.�..,.. ..T �.......n . KemberkytoMayhill_ �........ ��w ... �...'�..�. IiR6dd(t..
E-10 �.�aA S¢n.rrc,er 485 E of L�rr 288 4o Mayhil! $ � 4.r.i,000
., . . . _.... ..... . ........,,, _. ,a__.__.. _u�,_ ,.... ..------
......_ .... ...^ .�.. ..,.... uture} � 839,6W
E-11 C� , „ ..... .. . .i...akc,view il} ,.,y.. , __ Post Oak (Future) to 1025 E of Posl O�k (F,.w. .... , .... m ....,.., . ., --------
E-12 C; Lakeview (2) 2,7�65' %� af C'eme. Ckak (F'utur'e} to 4%i hop N i�rr� .. �......_ S 555,000
L�� M � (, w._.... - ------Ldwarrls , ...�_.... ..._...... . .. 56Q' Ei crf N'iaYh�ll to�5urvsh ., ...... ,..... _. ...__ .. . ...........
e m� ,e_ .. _._.._..... .........
° �¢ $ 3 794IXi6
� C E.; I`� . �_(�' ..._,=„_ .... &3onrl8ud ell C.".d! m ....�..,,.,,....... _ .....m.'.. iJrr¢vcM�n oQto�Wi�ll�s fdEid .....�_ ,__........' �...� .. �"424..��..
� „ ,.., ...__ ..... ._ �„aa. . . , m..m. , . .._........ e, ,e ,.Lo9rCt S.o , ., ..... „P, , ....r .. . ._.
...,. _... � . (7(76
E.-�G _ c ........ . Moakm bird ........ ......... A✓f�.Kcu¢rey9.... -... k�iVic.TGcnney ..... .... '6 697,,. ,...
E-17 SlV. k.3r�inlcer{1} ShadyOaks[oSpencer $ 4I38.W0
..........._.._ .._.......... .........w ,,....�.,..,,,__ ,,.,....._ ............... �., ...__.._._..._.._ . , ......,.,. ..,... .,......, ,..,,___...,... ._ ......._ ,..._ ...._.,.. .
E-18 Sl4. Ndayhill(I} Univcrsitytcr�crCarada � �........_ 56G7,507 ......
. .....�. , . , .._ P . _.,.. m ........._ ....... , m...,.,,,,,, . ...... .-------- , . �....,.,. ..,,.. ... ........
E-19 Pt# !1/31 Mavhill (21 ......... .. Calarado to 1-35E�NIIFft ,... '� y 92&3,0€76 .......
.. ,�,..,,, „ - .,,,,�w...,, . ...__._...... .:....._...--- ............... , .....� ...,. ......._...... ....... ,,......,..P,,..........._. .....
,,,,, 1,�2Q PA Posl Oak (2} ,. .. .... . .. ......... Umversity to l Of0 N oF�laE,�; � 3hfsr006 '....
__... ..... ... . , , ..... 1 0I0 N of f3 E� 66.. ...... u.� . ......,� . „�,. �
fa io 1 650 S of B 4� � 2 32.� dIND
. F;2C PA PostOak(31.,. .,,a .,.._ .....,...a..______.. .._..._..... __ �.._... .a.... ,�.,...._._�__ _... .�.. �....�....__..._
.---___ ... .....m _... ,._ ......... .........�e,.,.e,......_..,m._ _._. .._._�.,�.�,_.�,........ . ,.�.�n _..,.a�_� . , m
.,....&,..I7. PA _.. ----.._.._ __I'ost Oak (A} 1.496 N of Rh'dBs to ?,�d(HY N af PwBcYCrnne, . ._..µ..,....n .. µ�. ,.., .7 7�&E C7i....,.
➢:-23 PA Past Oak (5) 1,23G° N of McKinney ta Poc;krus I'a6e $ 37,�:7 t.CM10
..�m?h ..........'..A . ....... . . . . ..n .. ..,. . �.. _.� .._.._ _.._ ........_ , ...�.. . . ..,..........__ t -- .......... .,.. -- -..._..---
� ant C7ak (6 N'ackru�, {'� ;e tet k.a.kc,vsew �..., . .. � � fid0,00Q
. _..._.._ ......� �..m. �...,.�.. ._. _,_.a.� . . ..... .......m.,,.�_.._._ ._._......, edw.e..e....,, ... , ......,,.,.� . .___ . . ..m... ,�.....,..... , ..�. _.,e,_ . � .._.___..
Fi�-2.5 C, Lakeview (3) 136 S crf R�ianieo ta 73.`.r' 8 ok' MilBs 3� I 8�&4,440
.C' �.. . _ . , .. __.„._ . ... ........... _... _..._..... _ _.._......._._ � ..._.... ,..,,. ,„,.,„. .._ ,,.,....._._. ._ ._.. .. . _.._.._ � _ _ ....., . . _._. ..... .._...
26 C� 1 r�nRy-McKsnney Cannecior (1 } I Trinity ia 1290' N of McKinney � '� Cr i12,UQ0
. ...:. .... ... . . . . m. .._ _..,.. _ ... ... .._.... _ _ .�............._ .....a. � . n . .... M. . ,.,__.-�..... _._.�._._.._._ ......... ....... .. �..,�, . .. , ,. e _._...__ .._ .� . .._. _...
��.���f! SA 1'racxrty-McK¢nrrev C'crnncetor (2.} 1296' N of AhcKinney [o McKinney S f,G95.000 �
Scrvice Arce Projcct Cost Subtotal $ 120 601 015
2015Road�wa Im ctFeeStud CostPerServiceArea �� 55,300
Total Cost in SERVICE AREA E$ 120,656,315
a. These planning level cost projedions have been developed for ImpacT Fee calculations only and should not be used for any
future Capital Improvement Projecis within the City of DenTOn.
b. These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards or the determination of ihe City Engineer for
a specific project.
2015 Roadway Impau Fee Study 3 j January 2016
City of Denton, Texas
��� �
���� ��� ����� ,��'���"�
F. Service Unit Calculation
� ���' '"1��
�t �
�
;� �
u� ��'I� u i� M I ��'� ����i �,
The basic service unit for the computation of Denton's Roadway Impact Fees is the vehicle-
mile of travel during the afternoon peak-hour (as explained on Pg. 20). To determine the
cost per service unit, it is necessary to project the growth in vehicle-miles of travel for the
service area for the ten-year period.
The growth in vehicle-miles from 2015 to 2025 is based upon projected changes in
residential units and employment for the period. In order to determine this growth,
estimates of residential units, basic employment, service employment, and retail
employment for 2015 were made, along with growth projections for each of these
demographic statistics through 2025. The Land Use Assumptions section of this report
details the growth estimates used for impact fee determination.
For the purposes of impact fees, all developed and developable land is categorized as
either residential or non-residential. For residential land uses, the existing and projected
number of dwelling units are estimated. The number of dwelling units in each service
area is multiplied by a fransporfation demand facfor (discussed in more detail below) to
compute the vehicle-miles of travel that occur during the afternoon peak hour. This factor
indicates the average amount of demand created by the residential land uses in the
service area.
For non-residential land uses, the process is similar. The Land Use Assumptions section of
this report provides existing and projected number of building square footages for three
(3) categories of employment — basic, service, and retail. These categories correspond to
an aggregation of other specific land use categories based on the North American
Industrial Classification System (NAICS).
Building square footage is the most common independent variable for the estimation of
non-residential trips in the Institufe of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
Manual, 9�h Edition. This characteristic is more appropriate than the number of
employees, because building square footage is tied more closely to trip generation and
is known at the time of application for any development that would require the
assessment of an impact fee.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study 32 January 2016
Clty of Denton, Texas
umm
�I�'���' � � �� � � ° ��C� . � w
,�,
�:��� ��� :
The existing and projected land use assumptions for the dwelling units and the square
footage of basic, service, and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected
increase in vehicle-miles of travel. As noted earlier, a transportation demand factor is
applied to these values and then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle-miles of
demand for each service area.
The transportation demand factors are aggregate rates derived from two sources — the
ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9�h Edifion and the National Household Travel Survey
performed by the FHWA. The ITE Trip Generafion Manual, 9rh Edition provides the
number of trips that are produced or attracted to the land use for each dwelling unit,
square foot of building, or other corresponding unit. For the retail category of land uses,
the rate is adjusted to account for the fact that a percentage of retail trips are made by
people who would otherwise be traveling past that particular establishment anyway, such
as a trip between work and home. For example, a stop at a nearby supermarket on the
way home from work does not create a new trip onto the roadway network. These trips
are called pass-by trips, and since the travel demand is accounted for in the land use
calculations relative to the primary trip, it is necessary to discount the retail trip
generation rates to avoid double counting trips.
The next component of the transporfation demand facfor accounts for the length of each
trip. The average trip length for each category is based on the National Household
Travel Survey conducted by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study 33 January 2016
City of Denton, Texas
� �� � �� ��� ��oiii� ��Nr�, � �
��,���� �,.�,� 7
The computation of the transporfation demand facfor is based on the following equation:
TDF=T*(1—Pb)*Lmax
Whe�e...L,,,aX = min(L * OD or 6)
Variables:
TDF = Transportation Demand Factor,
T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit),
Pb = Pass-By Discount (% of trips),
LmaX = Maximum Trip Length (miles),
L = Average Trip Length (miles), and
OD = Origin-Destination Reduction (50%)
The maximum trip length was limited to six (6) miles based on the maximum trip length within
each service area. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code allows for a service
area of six (b) miles, and the service areas within Denton are closely approximated with a
six (6) mile distance.
The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the maximum
trip length is the origin-destination reduction. This adjustment is made because the Roadway
Impact Fee is charged to both the origin and destination end of the trip. For example,
impact fee methodology will account for a trip from home to work within Denton to both
residential and non-residential land uses. To avoid counting these trips twice as both
residential and non-residential trips, a 50% origin-destination (OD) reduction factor is
applied. Therefore, only half of the trip length is assessed to each land use, and the total
trip is only counted once. This methodology is consistent with that used in the National
Household Travel Survey.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study 34 January 201 6
CiTy of Denfon, Texas
� �������' �������� ���� ���r ���� ��
� � � ����� �����°����iiic:�� ���
Table 6 shows the derivation of the Transportafion Demand Factor for the residential land
uses and the three (3) non-residential land use categories. The values utilized for all
variables shown in the transportafion demand factor equation are also shown in the table.
Table 6. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations
����������._�������_... .�._ ................... �
Variable� Residential Basic Service Retail
......_____ � .......
T 1.00 0.97 1.49 3.71
Pb 0% 0% 0% 34%
L 9.79 14.65 14.65 5.60
L,„ax * 4.90 6.00 6.00 2.80
TDF 4.90 5.82 8.94 6.86
'k L,,,o. is less than b miles for residential and retail land uses; therefore This lower trip length is used for calculating
'the TDF for ihese land uses.
Variables:
TDF = Transportation Demand Factor,
T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips � unit),
Pb = Pass-By Discount (% of trips),
Lmax = Maximum Trip Length (miles),
L = Average Trip Length (miles), and
OD = Origin-Destination Reduction (50%)
The application of the demographic projections and the transportafion demand facfors are
presented in the 10-Year Growth Projections in Table 7. This table shows the total vehicle-
miles by service area for the years 2015 and 2025. These estimates and projections lead to
the Vehicle-Miles of Travel for both 2015 and 2025.
2015 Roadway Impact Fee Study 35 January 201 6
City of Denton, Texas
P!���"�� � ��� ' ����I�
h
.i�i
�
r.%
a�
'o
^i..�
I�
�
O
�.
C7
C�
�
�
O
rl
�
�
�
H
� J y
F- V W
Q � J
H �
W r
J O
� �
W....�.m�
J J
� a
_ �
� �
� ..�..w...�
W �
O W
� N
W
� U
Z m
J
� a
� w
H �,
� ___. .
LL
O W
� �
pW
I ti
ui �
K U
H ',, �
m
� J
W a
W W
LL �
W
� _��
� U
y 5
� �
F W
Z y
W
O
w
� U
2 �
O m
Z
J O1
U W
= J
� �
W
J �
� � IL
W �
N V a �
p = ~ ...
+� � ..��._.
.� �
&U
� Z LL c
0. W j �
�
L ?
y �
W
o � � .�
�
C7 C �
� N
N m
Q LL
N �
� ��W
O !pJ �
N tra
w z,��� �
�,
� ���m� . �� °��:��..��� , ��.
� ,,,�,,,'��. N M N � �
� ,,,,,. N eT °� N Yf
�::: ,,',, <1' N p � O
�,„„ ffl N oD � �
"6 .., f0 M O� m C
f�D m M N� N
�NrM��
N ?
o M P" O
�W �D
N h�
� N o�� o C u�i
M � �
� � C
m...,........��.�....,..... �..���, ......�� C l0
N
� f�0 Q�i O�i N N y �
N t�] M� V M
� �
U a-
d �
� ❑ d
� r N �
E � �
m � �n
,...� .................._..— � c
� � a
V C ti �
� N
a0 Q�1 OI y � � «
� 'e-� � o O � � O l0
� � � � ~ � � �° ,n �
N E W E� a�•°-L' °C
OD � m m C G
� ya J .Q ` g`j � Ql
� J�� E S C� w(JJ
� E� ro� c� o'.n u
a� in �° .� c�° o�•c �c o a�i
v N���m � ,Q a� � �` � j v a m�
[O 01 � (tl C
�LL �
� � M � � � c � � cp � � � � � �
�..�., i,,,.,,, N `S a0 a o U O:7 �_ � 3 N �
E�$� E y� c c aEi a�
,� ti� E r�n ❑� m� n E
� o°�pi ti s� rn � a�� c�
�. P- .�- h- V Q V e Q o = ti o g
ao ° ry ,� ai � � ai � � � � � a'�i
� M.�....��.�,.... i] � o� J p$ �� j� V o>
�'1 °O � U n. � C y N
� d
.-
..., ..,m...
� 0 6L � C � C�n. C C
-i ° o-i L° c a a�
�n �� u� �- ar C�1 s�° �
ti �n ' h- v at '� o v c p a C7 o v5 �`Ui
°' os �'�� � o0 omi ' N w 2 N m° N° z� �
ri.�o'r.�o m h"�-,� � O� �� C n o � w
E � E a
O c O � °
O O .n o 'o `a�� C � .�'i°
o io
�` i�.�''" a�i o" o�i C
� oo a� �� M U°Q ea U aCi � c�i U 16 v
d' a r M N�` a E c c�i E tr' �'� � u�
N lfi Oi V h- yMj 97 O � �p O .0 l6 � tl1 I6 a.
O lL �F iJ 11 N f� (n � m o
2 r Q m� m �
OOi �
� N
.......� . �. � .......... ......m'� N
O
� p� rN..
� N OMD � o N �
r �
�
� o....., V .. .
Z N
w
LL J � N O) M O�i I
� p M p � � � � N(7 N. P�
M� _� m � W 2 IND� N V' �,,, N
� �
�; W . W ...... i
Q��,.�'�,. m U � W � S C 0��' Q m U � W
� N �
2015 Roadway Impac4 Fee Saudy 36 January 2016
Ci4y of Den4on, Texas
Exhibit 4
COMMENTS
OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS
To the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas:
The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) by this document makes its findings and
comments regarding Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan for the possible adoption of
Roadway Impact Fees to the Denton City Council;
Land Use Assumptions
The CIAC received the first presentation from staff and the consultant on the Land Use Assumptions
(LUA) on January 14, 2016. Land Use Assumptions must be developed to provide the basis for
population and employment growth projections within a political subdivision to meet the requirements
of the Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code governing impact fees. The land use
assumptions are then used in determining the need for transportation improvements to serve future
development. The maximum Roadway Impact Fee determination is required to be based on the
projected growth and corresponding capacity needs in a 10-year window.
Based on the presentation and discussions CIAC requested additional information and clarification on
the LUA as listed below:
• Provide a 10 Year Growth Units Map based on the LUA projections
• Provide a 10 Year Growth Percentage Map based on the LUA projections
• Provide a Growth as a Percentage of Build Out Map based on the LUA projections
On February 4, 2016, staff and the consultant provided an update to the CIAC on the LUA that addressed
the CIAC comments and request for additional information from the meeting on January 14. Based on
this update the CIAC agrees that the LUA as prepared by the consultant is acceptable.
Capital Improvements Plan
On February 4, 2016, the staff and consultant presented the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements
Plan (CIP) to the CIAC. Development of a 10-year Roadway Impact Fee CIP is required per Chapter 395 of
the Texas local Government Code. The Roadway Impact Fee CIP is developed to meet the projected
growth of residential and non-residential uses based on the 10-year LUA. The Roadway Impact Fee CIP
includes arterial (Primary and Secondary) facilities, collector facilities, and major intersection
improvements that serve the overall transportation system. All of the roadway facilities identified for
capacity expansion are included in the adopted Denton Mobility Plan.
The CIAC agrees that the roadway capital improvements plan as prepared by the consultant is
acceptable.