Loading...
22-1716ORDINANCE NO. 22- 1716 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS AMENDING THE STORMWATERCRITERIA MANUAL; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, A SAVINGS CLAUSEAND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. DCA18-0009q, the City Council of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation (the “City”) adopted the newly revised Denton Development Code, superseding and expressly repealing Chapters 31, 34 and 35 of the 1991 Code of the City of Denton, Texas, as amended, and leaving all other Chapters intact and superseding and expressly repealing the 2002 Denton Development Code, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Denton Development Code established a process whereby the policies, regulations, and procedures relating to zoning and development within the City and its regulatory extraterdtorial jurisdiction are legislatively established by the Council after public hearing in acccordance with State law; and WHEREAS, the creation of specific design standards and methodologies (the “Development Criteria Manual”) are delegated to staff of professionals possessing the necessary and appropriate licensure and expertise who may also consult with their peers in both the public and private sectors, consistent with the policy direction of Council; and WHEREAS, the Development Criteria Manual process was intended to benefit the public and the development community by empowering City professional staff to more quickly implement new and improved materials and methods as they are developed, in accordance with generally accepted design standards of the industry, as appropriate to achieving an equal or greater public benefit for costs expended, for issues not involving policymaking decisions; and WHEREAS, the latest version of the Stormwater Criteria Manual was last prepared in December 2021; and WHEREAS, the Stormwater Criteria Manual update will be adopted by ordinance; and WHEREAS, after providing notice and conducting a public hearing as required by State law. the City Council finds that these changes to the Stormwater Criteria Manual are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and are in the public interest; NOW THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The findings and recitations contained in the preamble of this ordinance are incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. The Stormwater Criteria Manual is hereby amended and shall read ascontained in Exhibit “A.” SECTION 3. It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance was passed was open to the public as required by law, and that public notice of the time, place, and purpose of the meeting was given as required by State law. SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word in this Ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or under any circumstances is held invdid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, and the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas hereby declares it would have enacted such renaming provisions despite any such invalidity. SECTION 5. Save and except as amended hereby, all the provisions, sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of the code of Ordinances shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall become effective January 1, 2023. 1'""HZ”Mdi"”'“””'=”%yordik:,% ,.d ,Pf'by"d=: following vote [L - a]: Aye b/- b/- / L/ Nay Abstain Absent Gerard Hudspeth, Mayor: Vicki Byrd, District 1 : Brian Beck, District 2: Jesse Davis, District 3 : VACANT, District 4: Brandon Chase McGee, At Large Place 5: ( Chris Watts, At Large Place 6:L/- PASSED AND APPROVED this, the X day of Ge(j4yb2/':2022. mETH. MAYOR ATTEST: ROSA RIOS, CITY SECRETARY b\\\111111// APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: MACK REINWAND, CITY ATTORNEY BY: 8vla-9rl-'ph' fS City of Denton Exhibit A Stormwater Design Criteria Manual DENTON October 2022 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Table of Contents Section 1.0 – Introduction 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Design Criteria...............................................................................................................................2 Section 2.0 – Definitions ..........................................................................2 Section 3.0 Design Criteria .................................................................... 11 3.1 Hydrologic Methods .................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 3.1.2 Types of Hydrologic Methods, Rainfall Estimation.. , ,. 11 ,.13 .143.2 Acceptable Downstream Conditions for Open Channels and Floodplains 3.2.1 Streambank Protection .............................................................................................................. 15 3.2.2 Flood Mitigation.......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.2.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.2.2 Flood Mitigation Design Options ......................................................................................... 15 3.3 Stormwater System Design .............................................................................................................. 163.3.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 16 3.3.2 Hydraulic Design Criteria for Streets and Closed Conduits ................................................ 17 3.3.3 Hydraulic Design Criteria for Structures .............................................................................. 34 3.3.4 Channel Drop Structures.....................................................................................................40 3.3.5 Maintenance Access ...........................................................................................................40 3.4 C;ulverts .......................................................................................................................................41 3.5 Bridges ........................................................................................................................................42 Detention Facilities ......................................................................................................................423.6 3.6.1 Outlet Structures for Detention Facilities , . 44 3.7 Energy Dissipation ...................................................................................................................... 47 Floodplain.................................................................................................................................... 48 Floodplain Development Criteria......................................................................................... 48 Procedures for Floodplain Alteration of Drainage Areas with One Square Mile or Less. ...49 Fully Developed Water Surface Elevation Calculations. ..................................................... 50 Floodplain Alteration Guidelines ......................................................................................... 50 Easements and Fences ..............................................................................................................51 3.8 3.8.1 3.8.2 3.8.3 3.8.4 3.9 3.10 Water Quality............................................................................................................................... 52 3.10.1 Water Quality Protection Volume ........................................................................................ 52 3.10.2 Construction Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements ............................................... 52 52 Revision 10/6/22 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Section 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose The purpose of the Stormwater Design Criteria Manual is to implement the policies set forth in the Denton Development Code (DDC) and the City of Denton Code of Ordinances, Subpart B, Chapter 30 (Denton Flood Prevention and Protection Ordinance) by establishing standard principles and practices for the design and construction of storm drainage systems within the City of Denton, Texas, and its extraterritorial jurisdiction. This manual utilizes the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) integrated Stormwater Management (/SWMTM) Technical Manuals as part of the design criteria for stormwater systems. The design factors, formulae, graphs and procedures specified in this document are intended for use as minimum engineering criteria for the design of drainage systems with regards to the quantity, rate of flow, method of collection, storage, conveyance, detention and disposal of storm water. Responsibility for actual design remains with the design engineer. Users of this manual should be knowledgeable and experienced in the theory and application of drainage engineering. DDC Subchapter 7.4 EnvironmentallySensitive Areas City of DentonCode of Ordinances Chapter 30Flood Prevention & Protection Ordinance DDC Subchapter 7.5Drainage Standards Stormwater Design CriteriaManual /SWM TM Hydraulics Technical Manual /SWM TM Planning /SWM TM Landscape Technical Manual /SWMTM Site DesignControls Technical Manual /SWM TM Construction Control Standard Detail Technical Manual /SWM TM Water Quality Technical Manual /SWM TM Construction Controls Technical Manual Revision 10/6/22 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 1.2 Design Criteria A.This manual is not intended to be an all-inclusive design document. The Denton DevelopmentCode and City of Denton Code of Ordinances shall be consulted for possible impacts to theproposed design of stormwater facilities. B.The stormwater design criteria contained in this manual do not supersede the criteria containedin the Denton Development Code or Chapter 30 of the Denton Municipal Code and anyrevisions to those documents shall supersede the criteria in this manual. C.The stormwater criteria contained under Section 3.0 of this manual supersedes any design criteria contained in the /SWMTM Planning, Water Quality, Hydraulics, and Hydrology TechnicalManual Documents. D. Any deviation from the criteria and principles of this manual must be approved by the CityEngineer or designee. Section 2.0 – Definitions The definitions listed below are specific to this Stormwater Design Criteria Manual and may notapply to other City of Denton manuals. Abutment - A wall supporting the end of a bridge or span and sustaining the pressure of the borderingearth Apron - A floor or lining of concrete, timber, or other suitable material at the toe of a dam, entrance ordischarge side of a spillway, a chute, or other discharge structure, to protect the waterway from erosionfrom falling water or turbulent flow. Backwater - The rise of the water level upstream due to an obstruction or constriction in the channel. Backwater Curve - The term applied to the longitudinal profile of the water surface in an open channelwhen flow is steady but non-uniform. Baffles - Deflector varIes, guides, grids, gratings, or similar devices constructed or placed in flowing water,to: (1 ) check or effect a more uniform distribution of velocities; (2) absorb energy; (3) divert, guide, or agitate the stormwater flow; and (4) check eddy currents. Baffle Chute - A drop structure in a channel with baffles for energy dissipation to permit the lowering of the hydraulic energy gradient in a short distance to accommodate topography. Base Flood Elevation (BFE) - The elevation shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and foundin the accompanying Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Zones A, AE, AH, Al-30, AR, Vl-30, or VE that indicates the water surface elevation resulting from the flood that has a one percent (1 %) chance ofequalingor exceeding that level in any given year. Calibration - Process of checking, adjusting, or standardizing operating characteristics of instruments andmodel appurtenances on a physical model or coefficients in a mathematical model. The process of evaluating the scale readings of an instrument in terms of the physical quantity to be measured. Channel - a man-made drainageway or watercourse, generally constructed to straighten a stream or increase its capacity. Revision 10/6/22 2 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Channel Roughness - Irregularities in channel configuration which attenuate the flow of water anddissipate its energy. Chute - An inclined conduit or structure used for conveying water to a lower level Conduit - Any open or closed structure for conveying flowing water. Critical Flow - The state of flow for a given discharge at which the specific energy is a minimum withrespect to the bottom of the conduit. The Froude Number is equal to 1 .0 for critical flow conditions. Crown - The highest point on a transverse section of conduit or the highest point of a roadway cross section . Culvert - Large pipe or other conduit through which a small stream passes under a road or street. Curb - A vertical or sloping structure located along the edge of a roadway, normally constructed integrallywith the gutter, which strengthens and protects the pavement edge and clearly defines the pavement edgeto vehicle operators. Dam - A barrier constructed across a watercourse for the purpose of creating a reservoir or diverting waterfrom a conduit or channel. Degradation - The progressive general lowering of a stream channel by erosion, other than that causedby a constriction. Depression Storage - Collection and storage of rainfall in natural depressions after exceeding infiltrationcapacity of the soil. Design Storm or Flood - The storm or flood which is used as the basis for design . Detention - The storage of storm runoff for a controlled release during or immediately following the designstorm a) Off-site detention -A detention pond located outside the boundary of the area it serves.b) On-site detention -A detention pond which is located within and serves only a specific site orsubdivision. c) Regional detention -Detention facilities provided to control excess runoff based on a watershed- wide hydrologic analysis. Development - Any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to,buildings or other structures, paving, drainage or utilities. Development activities include: subdivision of land; construction or alteration of structures, roads, parking, fences, pools, signs, temporary uses, utilities,and other facilities; installation of septic systems; grading; excavation, mining or drilling operations; depositof refuse, debris, or fill materials; and clearing of natural vegetative cover (with the exception of agriculturalactivities as defined and as permitted). Routine repair and maintenance activities are exempted. Drop Structures - A sloping or vertical section of a channel designed to reduce the elevation of flowingwater without increasing its velocity. Entrance Head - The head required to cause flow into a conduit or other structure; it includes both entrance loss and velocity head. Entrance Loss - Head lost in eddies or friction at the inlet to a conduit, headwall or structure. Flash Flood - A flood of short duration with a relatively high peak rate of flow, usually resulting from a highintensity rainfall over a small area. Revision 10/6/22 3 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Flood Control - The elimination or reduction of flood losses by the construction of flood storage reservoirs,channel improvements, dikes and levees, by-pass channels, or other engineering works. Flood Hazard Area - Area subject to flooding by one percent (1%) chance floods. Flood Management or Flood Hazard Mitigation - Any program or activity designed to reduce damagesfrom flooding, including stream erosion. Floodplain - The area designated as subject to flooding from the base flood (one percent (1%) chanceflood) on the flood insurance rate map. The floodplain includes the regulatory floodway and floodway fringe. Floodway – The channel and adjacent lands of a watercourse that must be reserved in order to dischargethe base flood without increasing the water surface elevation more than the regulatory designated height. Floodway Fringe - The area located within the floodplain and outside the floodway Freeboard - The distance between the normal operating level and the top of the side of an open conduitleft to allow for wave action, floating debris, or any other condition or emergency without overtopping thestructure Frequency (of storms, floods) - Average recurrence interval of events, over long periods of time.Mathematically, frequency is the reciprocal of the exceedance probability. Froude Number - A flow parameter, which is a measure of the extent to which gravitational action affectsthe flow. A Froude number greater than 1 indicates supercritical flow and a value less than 1 subcriticalflow. The simplest form of the Froude number is given by the equation: F = V/(gD)o'5 where: V = Velocityg = the acceleration due to gravity(32.2 ft/sec/sec)D ; depth Fully Developed Conditions - A description of hydrologic conditions in a watershed, if the watershed hasbeen completely built out based on the zoning and future land use maps of the City. This term isinterchangeable with the term “Ultimate Developed Conditions”. This is not to be confused with aDeveloped Floodplain as defined in Subchapter 9.2 of the Denton Development code, which refers to thecharacter of the streambed itself. Gabion - A wire container filled with rock and used in the construction of dams, retaining walls, and protection against erosion. Grade - (1 ) The inclination or slope of a channel, canal, conduit, etc., or natural ground surface, usuallyexpressed in terms of the percentage of number of units of vertical rise (or faII) per unit of horizontaldistance. (2) The elevation of the invert of the bottom of a conduit, canal, culvert, sewer, etc. (3) The finishedsurface of a canal bed, road bed, top of an embankment, or bottom of excavation. Gutter -A generally shallow waterway adjacent to a curb used to convey stormwater Headwater - (1) The upper reaches of a stream near its sources; (2) the region where ground watersemerge to form a surface stream; (3) the water upstream from a structure. Hydraulic Control - The hydraulic characteristic which determines the stage-discharge relationship in aconduit. The control is usually critical depth, tailwater depth, or uniform depth. Revision 10/6/22 4 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) - A line representing the pressure head available at any given point withinthe system. Hydraulic Gradient - A hydraulic profile of the piezometric level of the water, representing the sum of thedepth of flow and the pressure head. In open channel flow it is the water surface. Hydraulic Jump - The hydraulic jump is an abrupt rise in the water surface which occurs in an open channel when water flowing at supercritical velocity is retarded by water flowing at subcritical velocity. The transitionthrough the jump results in a marked loss of energy, evidenced by turbulence of the flow within the area of the jump. The hydraulic jump is sometimes used as a means of energy dissipation. Hydraulics - A branch of science that deals with practical applications of the mechanics of watermovement. Hydrograph - A graph showing stage, flow, velocity or other property of water versus time at a given pointon a stream or conduit. Examples include: a)b)Dimensionless Unit hydrographUnit Hydrograph Hydrology – The science dealing with the properties, distribution, and circulation of water on and belowthe Earth’s surface and in the atmosphere. Hyetograph - A histogram or graph of rainfall intensity versus time of storm. Impervious - A term applied to a material through which water cannot pass, or through which water passes with great difficulty. Infiltration - (1) The entering of water through the interstices or pores of a soil or other porous medium.(2) The entrance of water from the ground into a sewer or drain through breaks, defective joints, or porouswalls. (3) The absorption of water by the soil, either as it falls as precipitation, or from a stream flowing overthe surface. Inlet - Inlets are drainage structures used to collect surface water through grate or curb openings andconvey it to storm drains or direct outlet to culverts. Inlets used for the drainage of roadway surfaces can be divided into four major classes:a. Grate Inlets – These inlets include grate inlets consisting of an opening in the gutter covered by one or more grates, and slotted inlets consisting of a pipe cut along the longitudinal axis with a grate orspacer bars to form slot openings.b. Curb-Opening Inlets – These inlets are vertical openings in the curb covered by a top slab.c. Combination Inlets – These inlets usually consist of both a curb-opening inlet and a grate inlet placed in a side-by-side configuration, but the curb opening may be located upstream of the grate.d. Drop Inlet (Y-Inlet) -A storm drain intake structure typically located in unpaved areas. The inlet mayextend above the ground level with openings on one or more sides of the inlet or it may be flush with theground with a grated cover. Intensity - As applied to rainfall, a rate usually expressed in inches per hour. Interception - As applied to hydrology, refers to the process by which precipitation is caught and held by foliage, twigs, and branches of trees, shrubs and buildings, never reaching the surface of the ground, andthen lost by evaporation. Invert - The floor, Bottom, or lowest portion of the internal cross section of a conduit. Revision 10/6/22 5 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Lag Time - The time difference between two occurrences such as between rainfall and runoff or pumpingof a well and effect on the stream. See Time of Concentration. Lining - Impervious material such as concrete, clay, grass, plastic, puddled earth, etc., placed on the sidesand bottom of a ditch, channel, and reservoir to prevent or reduce seepage of water through the sides andbottom and/or to prevent erosion. Lip - A small wall on the downstream end of an apron to break the flow from the apron. Manning’s Coefficient - The coefficient of roughness used in Manning’s Equation for flow in openchannels. Manning’s Equation - A uniform flow equation used to relate velocity, hydraulic radius and the energygradient slope. Model - Mathematical systems analysis by computer, applied to evaluate rainfall-runoff relationships;simulate watershed characteristics, predict flood and reservoir routings, or use other aspects of planning Nappe - The sheet or curtain of water overflowing a weir or dam. When freely overflowing any givenstructure, it has a well-defined upper and lower surface. 100-year Event - Event (rainfall or flood) that has a one percent (1 %) chance of being equaled or exceeded In any gIven year Open Channel - A conduit in which water flows with a free surface. Orifice - (1 ) An opening with closed perimeter, and of regular form in a plate, wall, or partition through whichwater may flow. (2) The end of a small tube, such as a Pilot tube, piezometer, etc. Peak Flow (Peak Rate of Runoff) - The maximum rate of runoff during a given runoff event. Percolation - To pass through a permeable substance such as ground water flowing through an aquifer. Permeability - The property of a material which permits movement of water through it when saturated andactuated by hydrostatic pressure. Pervious - Applied to a material through which water passes relatively freely. Pilot Channel – A constructed pathway that guides base streamflow or runoff along a specified routethrough a drainage facility or drainage feature. Porosity - (1 ) An index of the void characteristics of a soil or stratum as pertaining to percolation; degreeof pewiousness. (2) The ratio, usually expressed as a percentage, of (a) the volume of the interstices in agiven quantity of material, to (b) the total volume of the material. Positive Overflow - When the inlets do not function properly, or when the design capacity of the conduit isexceeded, the excess flow must be conveyed overland along a paved course. This could mean along astreet or alley but could require a concrete flume and the dedication of special drainage easements onprivate property. Post-development - The condition of the given site and drainage area after the anticipated developmenthas taken place. Precipitation - Any moisture that falls from the atmosphere, including snow, sleet, rain and hail. Pre-development - The condition of the given site and drainage area prior to development. Revision 10/6/22 6 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) - The flood that may be expected from the most severe combination of critical meteorological and hydrologic conditions that are reasonably possible in the region. Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) - The critical depth-duration-area rainfall relationship for a given area during the seasons of the year which would result from a storm containing the most criticalmeteorological conditions considered probable of occurring. Rainfall Duration - The length of time over which a single rainfall event occurs. Rainfall Frequency - The average recurrence interval of rainfall events. Rainfall Intensity - The rate of accumulation of rainfall, usually in inches of millimeters per hours. Rational Formula - A traditional method of computing peak flow using intensity of the storm rainfall. Reach - Any length of river or channel. Usually used to refer to sections which are uniform with respect todischarge, depth, area or slope, or sections between gaging stations. Recurrence Interval - The average interval of time within which a given event will be equaled or exceededonce. For an annual series (as opposed to a partial duration series) the probability of occurrence in anyone year is the inverse of the recurrence interval. Thus a flood having a recurrence interval of 100 years has a1 percent probability of being equaled or exceeded in any one year. Regulatory Floodway - The channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that mustbe reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevationmore than a designated height. Retention – The storage of a portion or all of the storm runoff for purposes of permanent use of the retainedwater. Retention facilities are similar to detention facilities with the main difference being that all of the stormrunoff will not be released to the downstream drainage network. Return Period - See Recurrence Interval Reynold’s Number - A flow parameter which is a measure of the viscous effects on the flow. Typicallydefined as: Re = VD/v Where:V = VelocityD = Depthv ; kinematic viscosity of the fluid Riprap (Revetment) - Forms of bank protection, usually using rock or concrete. Routing - Routing is a technique used to predict the temporal and spatial variations of a flood wave as ittraverses a river reach or reservoir. Generally, routing technique may be classified into two categories - hydrologic routing and hydraulic routing. ROW (Rightof-Way) - A strip of land dedicated for public streets and/or related facilities, including utilitiesand other transportation uses. ROW Width - The shortest horizontal distance between the lines which delineate the right-of-way of astreet Runoff - That part of the precipitation which reaches a stream, drain, sewer, etc., directly or indirectly. Revision 10/6/22 7 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual a) Direct Runoff -The total amount of surface runoff and subsurface storm runoff which reachesstream channels b) Overland Runoff -Water flowing over the land surface before it reaches a definite streamchannel or body of water. Runoff Coefficient - A decimal number used in the Rational Formula which defines the runoff characteristics of the drainage area under consideration. It may be applied to an entire drainage basin asa composite representation or it may be applied to a small individual area such as one residential lot. Runoff Total - The total volume of flow from a drainage area for a definite period of time such as a day, month, or a year, or it may be for the duration of a particular storm . Scour - The erosive action of running water in streams or channels in excavating and carrying awaymaterial from the bed and banks. SCS Runoff Curve Number - Index number used by the National Resource Conservation Service, formerlythe Soil Conservation Service, as a measure of the tendency of rainfall to run off into streams rather than evaporate or infiltrate. Sediment - Material of soil and rock origin transported, carried, or deposited by water. Sedimentation Basin - A sediment control basin required to catch runoff from common drainage areas with ten (10) acres or more disturbed at one time during any phase of development that dewaters from thesurface unless infeasible. Sidewalk - A paved area within the street right-of-way or sidewalk easement specifically designed forpedestrians and/or bicyclists. Slope, Critical - The slope or grade of a channel that is exactly equal to the loss of head per foot resultingfrom flow at a depth that will give uniform flow at critical depth; the minimum slope of a conduit which willproduce critical flow. Slope, Friction - The friction head or loss per unit length of channel or conduit. For uniform flow the friction slope coincides with the energy gradient, but where a distinction is made between energy losses due tobends, expansions, impacts, etc., a distinction must also be made between the friction scope and theenergy gradient. The friction slope is equal to the bed or surface slope only for uniform flow in uniform openchannels Soffit - in a stormwater pipe, the uppermost point of the interior of the pipe wall. The crown is the uppermostpoint on the outside of the pipe wall. Spillway - A waterway in or about a dam or other hydraulic structure, for the overflow of excess water. Steady Flow - Open channel flow is said to be steady if the depth of flow does not change or if it can beassumed to be constant during the time interval of consideration. Stream - a natural drainageway that conveys stormwater, may also be referred to as a creek. Referencesto a stream or creek in this manual refer to the entire stormwater carrying component of the stream to thelimits of the floodplain, not just to the streambed. Stilling Basin - Pool of water conventionally used, as part of a drop structure or other structure, to dissipateenergy Storm Hydrology - The branch of hydrology that concentrates on the calculation of runoff from storm rainfall Revision 10/6/22 8 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Stormwater Management - The control of storm runoff on-site or on small streams, by means of land userestrictions, detention storage, erosion control, and/or drainage measures. Stormwater Model - Mathematical representation of a stormwater network. Subcritical Flow - The Froude Number is less than 1.0 for subcritical flow conditions Supercritical Flow - The Froude Number is greater than 1.0 for supercritical flow conditions, Tailwater - The depth of flow in the stream directly downstream of a drainage facility. Time of Concentration - The estimated time in minutes required for runoff to flow from the most remotesection of the drainage area to the point at which the now is to be determined. Total Head Line (Energy Line) - A line representing the energy in flowing water. The elevation of theenergy line is equal to the elevation of the flow line plus the depth plus the velocity head plus the pressurehead Trash Rack - Racks, gratings, or mesh designed so as to prevent leaves and rubbish from plugging theoutlets from a dam or detention basin . Trunk Line - The main line of a storm drain system extending from manhole to manhole or from manholeto outlet structure. Uniform Channel - A channel with a constant cross section and roughness. Uniform Flow - Open channel flow is said to be uniform if the depth of flow is the same at every section ofthe channel. Unit Hydrograph - The direct runoff hydrograph resulting from one inch of precipitation excess distributeduniformly over a watershed for a specified duration. Valley Storage – Refers to the water storage capacity of a stream and is a volume that is measured belowthe base flood elevation. Restrictions on loss of valley storage refer to compensation for the loss of storagecaused by fill below the base flood elevation. Velocity Head - The energy per unit weight of water due to its velocity (v). The velocity head also representsthe vertical distance water must fall freely under gravity to reach its velocity (v). The velocity head can becomputed from: Vel. Head = V2/2g V = Velocityg = acceleration due to gravity (g = 32.2 feet per second) Water Year - The water year commonly used in the United States is the period from October 1 to September30 of the following calendar year. Watershed - The area contributing storm runoff to a stream or drainage system. Other terms are drainagearea, drainage basin and catchment area. Revision 10/6/22 9 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Revision 10/6/22 10 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Section 3.0 Design Criteria Section 3.0 of this manual includes the criteria for addressing the key adverse impacts of development onstormwater runoff Design Focus Areas The design criteria for stormwater management include the following Focus Areas: • Streambank Protection: Regulate discharge from the site to minimize downstream bank and channelerosion • Flood Mitigation and Conveyance: Control runoff within and from the site to minimize flood risk topeople and properties for the conveyance storm as well as the 1 percent chance storm. Design Storms Design is based on the following four (4) storm events. Table 3.0 Storm Events Storm Event Name “Water Quality” Streambank Protection” “Conveyance' Flood Mitigation' Storm Event Description Criteria based on a volume of 1 .5 inches of rainfall, not a storm frequency 1-year, 24-hour storm event 25-year, 24-hour storm event 100-year, 24-hour storm event Throughout the manual the storms will be referred to by their storm event names. •Drainage facilities shall be designed utilizing the Flood Mitigation storm event. Replacement or modification of existing drainage facilities shall not reduce capacity but may be designed according to the requirements of the specific project and may utilize the Conveyance storm as the design storm event as directed by the City Engineer or designee. 3.1 Hydrologic Methods 3. 7. 7 Types of Hydrologic Methods There are several empirical hydrologic methods available to estimate runoff characteristics for a site or drainage sub basin. However, the following methods have been selected to support hydrologic site analysisfor the design methods and procedures included in this manual: • Rational Method • SCS Unit Hydrograph Method Revision 10/6/22 11 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual • Snyder’s Unit Hydrograph Method • USGS & TXDOT Regression Equations Table 3.1 lists the hydrologic methods and the circumstances for their use in various analysis and designapplications. Table 3.2 provides some limitations on the use of several methods. In general: • • The Rational Method is acceptable for small, highly impervious drainage areas, such as parking lotsand roadways draining into inlets and gutters. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) regressionequations are acceptable for drainage areas with characteristics within the ranges given for theequations shown in Table 3.2. These equations should not be used when there are significant storage areas within the drainage basin or where other drainage characteristics indicate general regressionequations are not appropriate. Table 3.1 Applications of the Recommended Hydrologic Methods Method Rational Method SCSMethod Modified Rational Snyder’sUnit Hydrograph USGS / TXDOT Equations Streambank Protection Volume SPy V V a J J a a ,/ ./ + V V‘ a V Flood MitigationDischarge (Qf)a Storage Facilities ,r Outlet Structures Gutter Flow and Inlets V J V Storm Drain Pipes Cu lverts Bridges Small Ditches ,/ JOpen Channels Energy Dissipation Revision 10/6/22 12 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Table 3.2 Constraints on Using Recommended Hydrologic Methods Method I Size Limitations1 Comments Method can be used for estimating peak flows and the design of small site or subdivision storm sewer systems. Rational 0 – 100 acres Modified Rational2 0 – 200 acres Method can be used for estimating runoff volumesfor storage design. Unit Hydrograph (SCS)3 Any Size Method can be used for estimating peak flows andhydrographs for all design applications. Unit Hydrograph (Snyder’s)4 1 acre and larger Method can be used for estimating peak flows and hydrographs for all design applications. TXDOT Regression Equations 10 to 100 mi2 Method can be used for estimating peak flows for rural design applications. USGS Regression 3 _ 40 mi2 Method can be used for estimating peak no ws forEquations I - ' - "" I urban design applications. 1 Size limitation refers to the drainage basin for the stormwater management facility (e.g., culvert, inlet). 2 Where the Modified Rational Method is used for conceptualizing, the engineer must use the /SWM TM Hydrology Technical Manual Document when using this method. 3 This refers to SCS routing methodology included in many readily available programs (such as HEC-HMS or HEC- 1 ) that utilize this methodology. 4 This refers to the Snyder’s methodology included in many readily available programs (such as HEC-HMS or HEC- 1 ) that utilize this methodology. 3.1.2 Rainfall Estimation Rainfall intensities, provided from NOAA, are based on Atlas 14 and shall be used for an hydrologic analysiswithin Denton County. https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds map cont.html?bkmrk=tx Revision 10/6/22 13 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 3.2 Acceptable Downstream Conditions for Open Channels and Floodplains The downstream impacts of development must be carefully evaluated for the two focus areas ofStreambank Protection and Flood Mitigation. The purpose of the downstream assessment is to protect downstream properties from increased flooding and downstream channels from increased erosion potential due to upstream development. The importance of the downstream assessment is particularly evident forlarger sites or developments that have the potential to dramatically impact downstream areas. Thecumulative effect of smaller sites, however, can be just as dramatic and, as such, following the Focus Areasis just as important for the smaller sites as it is for the larger sites. The assessment shall extend from the outfall of a proposed development to a point downstream where the discharge from a proposed development no longer has a significant impact, in terms of flooding increaseor velocity above allowable, on the receiving stream or storm drainage system. The City shall be consulted to obtain records and maps related to the National Flood Insurance Program and the availability of FloodInsurance Studies and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) which will be helpful in this assessment. Theassessment must include the following properties: • • • • • Hydrologic analysis of the pre- and post-development on-site conditions Drainage path that defines extent of the analysis Capacity analysis of all existing constraint points along the drainage path, such as existing floodplaindevelopments, underground storm drainage systems culverts, bridges, tributary confluences, orchannels Offsite undeveloped areas are considered as “full build-out” for both the pre- and post-developmentanalysesEvaluation of peak discharges and velocities for three 24-hour storm events Streambank protection storm Conveyance stormFlood mitigation storm •• • Separate analysis for each major outfall from the proposed development• Once the analysis is complete, the designer must answer the following questions at each determined junction downstream: • Are the post-development discharges greater than the pre-development discharges? • Are the post-development velocities greater than the pre-development velocities? • Are the post-development velocities greater than the velocities allowed for the receiving system?• Are there any increases in post-development flood heights above the pre-development flood heights? These questions shall be answered for each of the three storm events. The answers to these questions will determine the necessity, type, and size of non-structural and structural controls to be placed on-site or downstream of the proposed development. Section 2.0 of the /SWMTM Hydrology Technical Manual Document gives additional guidance on calculating the discharges and velocities, as well as determining the downstream extent of the assessment. Revision 10/6/22 14 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 3.2.1 Streambank Protection The first focus area is in streambank protection. There are two options by which a developer can provide adequate streambank protection downstream of a proposed development. The first step is to perform the required downstream assessment as described in Section 3.2. If it is determined that the proposed project does not exceed acceptable downstream velocities or the downstream conditions are improved to adequately handle the increased velocity, then no additional streambank protection is required. If on-site or downstream improvements are required for streambank protection, easements or right-of-entry agreementswill need to be obtained in accordance with Section 3.9. If the downstream assessment shows that the velocities are within acceptable limits, then no streambank protection is required. Acceptable limits forvelocity control are contained in Tables 3.10 and 3.11. If existing stream velocities exceed the maximum allowable velocities, then no increase in velocities will be permitted. Option 1: Reinforce/Stabilize Downstream Conditions If the increased velocities are greater than the allowable velocity of the downstream receiving system, then the developer must reinforce/stabilize the downstream conveyance system. The proposed modifications must be designed so that the downstream system is protected from the post-development velocities, The developer must provide supporting calculations and/or documentation that the downstream velocities do not exceed the allowable range once the downstream modifications are installed. Allowable bank protection methods include stone riprap, gabions, and bio-engineered methods. Sections3.2 and 4.0 of the /SWMTM Hydraulics Technical Manual Document give design guidance for designing stone riprap for open channels, culvert outfall protection, riprap aprons for erosion protection at outfalls, and riprap basins for energy dissipation. If the downstream receiving system is designated as an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) this option may not be a viable option. See sections 9.2 and 7.4 of the Denton Development Code. Option 2: Install Stormwater Controls to Maintain Existing Downstream Conditions The developer must use on-site controls to keep downstream post-development discharges at or below allowable velocity limits. The developer must provide supporting calculations and/or documentation that the on-site controls will be designed such that downstream velocities for the three storm events (Streambank Protection, Conveyance, and Flood Mitigation) are within an allowable range once the controls are installed. 3.2.2 Flood Mitigation 3.2.2.1 Introduction Flood analysis is based on the flood mitigation storm event. The intent of the flood mitigation criteria is to provide for public safety; minimize on-site and downstreamflood impacts from the flood mitigation storm event; maintain the boundaries of the mapped 100-year floodplain; and protect the physical integrity of the on-site stormwater controls and the downstreamstormwater and flood mitigation facilities. Flood mitigation must be provided for on-site conveyance systems, as well as downstream outfalls asdescribed in the following sections. 3.2.2.2 Flood Mitigation Design Options Revision 10/6/22 15 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual There are three options by which a developer may address downstream flood mitigation as discussedbelow. When on-site or downstream modifications are required for downstream flood mitigation, easements or right-of-entry agreements will need to be obtained. The developer will provide all supporting calculations and/or documentation to show that the existingdownstream conveyance system has capacity (Qf) to safely pass the full build-out flood mitigation stormdischarge. Option 1: Provide Adequate Downstream Conveyance Systems When the downstream receiving system does not have adequate capacity, then the developer shall providemodifications to the off-site, downstream conveyance system. If this option is chosen, the proposedmodifications must be designed to adequately convey the full build-out stormwater peak discharges for theflood mitigation storm event. The modifications must also extend to the point at which the discharge from the proposed development no longer has an impact on the receiving stream or storm drainage system. The developer must provide supporting calculations and/or documentation that the downstream peak dischargesare safely conveyed by the proposed system, without endangering downstream properties, structures,bridges, roadways, or other facilities, and no increase in water surface elevation. Option 2: Install Stormwater Controls to Maintain Existing Downstream Conditions When the downstream receiving system does not have adequate capacity, then the developer shall providestormwater controls to reduce downstream flood impacts. These controls include on-site controls such asdetention, regional controls, and, as a last resort, local flood protection such as levees, floodwalls, floodproofing, etc. The developer must provide supporting calculations and/or documentation that the controls will be designedand constructed so that there is no increase in downstream peak discharges or water surface elevations due to development. Option 3: in lieu of a Downstream Assessment, Maintain Existing On-Site RunoffConditions Lastly with Option 3, on-site controls shall be used to maintain the pre-development peak discharges from the site. The developer must provide supporting calculations and/or documentation that the on-site controlswill be designed and constructed to maintain on-site existing conditions. It is important to note that Option 3 may not require a downstream assessment. It is a detention-based approach to addressing downstream flood mitigation after the application of the Integrated site designpractices. However, a downstream assessment may be required for sites adjacent to or near streams in which delayed release of flows from detention facilities could potentially increase the peak flow in the streamdue to coincident peaks. This assessment of the impact of coincident peaks is required for all sites with acontributing drainage area greater than or equal to ten percent (10%) of the stream drainage area at the subject discharge point. 3.3 Stormwater System Design3.3.1 Introduction Stormwater system design is an integral component of both site and overall stormwater managementdesign. Good drainage design must strive to maintain compatibility and minimize interference with existingdrainage patterns; control flooding of property, structures, and roadways for design flood events; andminimize potential environmental impacts on stormwater runoff. Stormwater collection systems must be designed to provide adequate surface drainage while at the same time meeting other stormwater management goals such as water quality, streambank protection, habitatprotection, and flood mitigation . Revision 10/6/22 1 6 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Design Fully developed watershed conditions shall be used for determining runoff for the flood mitigation storm . 3.3.2 Hydraulic Design Criteria for Streets and Closed Conduits A. Introduction This section is intended to provide criteria and guidance for the design of on-site flood mitigation system components including: • Street and roadway gutters • Stormwater inlets • Storm drainpipe systems • Parking lot sheet flow B. Streets and ROW 1. Design Criteria a) Flow spread limits for curbed streets are shown in Table 3.4. b) Inverted crown sections are permitted only in alleys. c) Street crowns shall be reduced for approximately one hundred (100) feet on each side of valley gutters. No valley gutters will be permitted across collectors or arterials. d) For non-curbed streets the flood mitigation storm event shall be contained within parallelingroadside ditches, within the public right-of-way (Figure 5-2). e) Roadside ditches shall be designed to carry the Hood-mitigation runoff below the roadwayelevation . O Streets or alleys adjacent to an open channel shall have the edge of the pavement designed with an elevation of minimum of one (1 ) foot above Flood Mitigation elevation or as directed by the City Engineer or designee. g) Where additional hydraulic capacity is required on the street, the proposed street gradient must be increased, or curb inlets and storm sewers installed to remove a portion of the flow. h) The maximum concentrated flow directed into the street (from a driveway or flume, etc.) is 3 cfs Revision 10/6/22 1 7 Stormwater Design Criteria Manua Revision 10/6/22 18 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual FIGURE 5–2 R.O. W. FLOOD MITIGATION SJRFACE ELEVATION =?.O. 'bb' WATER SPREAD LIV ITS :OR NGFl– CURB[D RC)A.DWA"fS 2. Flow Spread Limits Revision 10/6/22 19 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Inlets shaH be spaced so that the spread of flow in the street for the flood mitigation storm shall not exceed the guidelines listed below, as measured from the gutter or face of the curb: Table 3.4 Flow Spread Limits Street Classification Allowable Encroachment one travel lane remains open• one travel lane in each direction remains• open curb depth• Collectors Arterials Residential Streets The allowable drainage flow across street intersections for the flood mitigation storm event shall be asfollows: Table 3.5 Permissible Flow Across StreetIntersections Street Classification Cross Flow Arterial Street (divided and undivided))None Non-Residential Collector Street None Gutter Flow of 2Residential Street and Residential Collector inches or less 3. Minimum Street or Alley Elevations No lowering of the standard height of street crown shall be allowed for the purposes of obtaining additional hydraulic capacity. Street crowns shall be in accordance with the City of Denton Standard Details C. Drainage Related Minimum Elevations 1. Lots shall have a minimum elevation for the buildable area (including parking areas) of the lot of - 18 inches above the one percent chance (IC)0-year) base flood elevation (BFE), or as directed by the City Engineer or designee. 2. Where lots are positioned on a downhill side of a steep lead-in road to a “T” or “L" intersection, or a sharp turn in a steep alley, the portion of the lot facing toward the high-water flooding danger area will be 6" above the top of the curb. 3. For lots in the influence of a sag area and a positive overflow, the lot elevation will be at least one(1) foot above the sag area top of the curb, or one (1) foot above the possible maximum pool elevation when the positive overflow is functioning, whichever elevation is higher. Revision 10/6/22 20 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 4. Where lots do not abut a natural or excavated channel, minimum floor elevations shall be a minimum of one (1 ) foot above the street curb, edge of alley, or rear property line (at the midpoint of the lot), whichever is lower, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer or designee. D. Stormwater Inlet Design 1 Permissible Types of Inlets Drop Inlets (Y-inlet). Drop inlets are sump inlets which are not located along the curb line of aroadway . Grate Inlets. The use of grate inlets is not allowed on public drainage systems without prior consentfrom the City Engineer or designee. If allowed, the inlet opening shall be designed twice as large as the calculated opening to compensate for clogging. Grate inlets may be used on privatesystems . Curb Inlets. Curb inlets may be located at roadway low points (sumps) or on grade at such pointsas to meet the water spread limitations and cross flow depth requirements. Curb inlets may be oneof the following: Recessed curb inlet. Recessed curb inlets are curb inlets constructed such that the front of the inlet is 2.0 feet behind the normal face of curb and the depression does not extend into thetraffic lanes. Standard curb inlet. Standard curb inlets are curb inlets that are in line with the roadway curb. Type 2 curb inlet. Type 2 inlets are standard curb inlets where the inlet box is locatedunderneath the outer roadway lane instead of behind the curb. They are only to be utilized insituations where there is insufficient parkway area or an encumbered parkway area for astandard curb inlet. 2 Design Criteria a)Public curb inlet size shall be 10, 15, or 20 feet. Maximum length of inlet at any one curblocation shall be 20 feet on each side of the street. Inlets will be placed only in straight sectionsof curb, and at least 10 feet from the curb return. Inlets required in cul-de-sacs are the onlyexceptions to the straight curb section requirement. Curb inlets are not allowed in intersectionor curb returns. b) C) Recessed inlets will be required on arterial and non-residential collector streets. The maximum inlet opening shall be six (6") inches. Openings larger than six inches shallrequire approval by the City Engineer or designee and shall contain a bar, or other form ofrestraint d)Inlets shall be located in the following locations: i. At low points, ii. Upstream of pavement crown transitions at intersections (or identify flow patterns anddepths to show these inlets are not needed), 111.Where street flow spread limits or permissible intersection depths are exceeded. e) D Where possible, inlets at intersections shall be located on the street with the lesserclassification, or on alleys. A by-pass of no more than 5% of the inlet capacity will be allowed for the flood mitigation stormevent g) Water flowing in gutters of arterials should be picked up prior to super-elevated sections toprevent water flowing across the street for the flood mitigation storm event. h)In super-elevated sections of divided arterials, inlets placed against the center medians shall Revision 10/6/22 21 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual have no gutter depressions. Interior gutter now (flow along the median) shall be intercepted at the point of superelevation transition to prevent street cross flow. i) i) At bridges with curbed approaches, water should be intercepted before flowing onto the bridgeto prevent icing during cold weather. The use of recessed inlets shall only be allowed where they do not adversely impact the width,location or compliance of sidewalk facilities to Texas Administration Standards and City ofDenton standards. k) The use of recessed inlets shall only be allowed where they do not adversely impact the accessor functionality of existing utility facilities. 1)Design and location of inlets shall take into consideration pedestrian and bicycle traffic. m) The use of slotted drains is discouraged except in instances where there is no alternative andrequires approval by the City Engineer or designee. If used, the manufacturer’s designguidelines should be followed. n) Depressed inlets are recommended on continuous grades that exceed one percent; althoughthe use in traffic lanes should be avoided whenever possible. 0)Redundant Inlets. A redundant, flanking inlet is required wherever a sag point or low point inletis identified. The redundant inlet shall have the same size as the sag or low point inlet but will not be considered in the hydraulic capacity calculations. The redundant inlet shall have an inletelevation of no more than 6“ above the sag or low point inlet elevation to ensure ponding doesnot overtop the curb. . 3. Inlet Computations a) Sump Inlets and Drop Inlets Curb inlets and drop inlets in a sump or low point can be considered to function as a rectangular broad- crested weir with a coefficient of discharge of 3.06. The capacity shall be based on the followingweir equation: Q/L or Q/P = 3.06 H3/2 Q = Capacity in cfs. of curb opening inlet or capacity in cfs. of drop inlet H = Head at the inlet in feet L ; Length of curb opening inlet in feet; or P = Length of portion of perimeter of inlet opening which water enters the drop inlet in feet Inlets should be located such that the inlet openings do not become submerged. In some cases wherethis is not possible, and the inlet operates under completely submerged conditions, the orifice equation should be used to compute the inlet capacity rather than the weir formula. The capacityof a completely submerged inlet shall be based on the following orifice equation: Q = 4.84 A H1/2 A =Area of inlet opening The curves shown in Figures 6-2 and 6-3 provide for direct solution of the above equations. Revision 10/6/22 22 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual In order to facilitate the computations required in determining the various hydraulic properties for curbinlets and drop inlets in sump conditions, Computation Sheet 6-1 has been prepared. Column 1 Inlet number and designation. Column 2 Total flow in cfs to inlet. For inlets other than the first inlet in a system, flow is the sum of runoff from contributing area plus carry-over flow from inlet or inlets upstream. Assumed length of inlet opening or perimeter in feet. Total area of inlet opening based on assumed inlet opening length and opening height. Discharge per unit foot of inlet opening. Column 2 divided by Column 3. Computed head at inlet for weir flow conditions based on Figures 6-2 or 6-3 or the following equation: H = (q/3)"; Computed head at inlet for orifice flow conditions (submerged inlet) based on Figures 6-2 or 6-3 or the following equation: Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 H = [(Q/A)/4.82]2 Column 8 Maximum allowable head at sump inlet. This value is determined from topographic conditions at the sump inlet site Width of spread of water for curb inlets in sump. Use Figure 5-3 or 54, or Appendix B to determine Sp for roadways. Column 9 Revision 10/6/22 23 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual aL = 2(a + b) A = NET AREA F-LLILJLLZ I a <LLII ,n\ U a 3/23.0 HqL 8 100.2 0.3 0.4 0.50.6 0.8 1.0 DISCHARGE IN CFS PER FT OF PERIMETER (qI )DISCHARGE IN CFS PER SF OF AREA (0/A) HEADS UP TO 0.4 USE CURVE (o) HEADS ABOVE 1.4 USE CURVE (b) AT HEADS BETWEEN 0.4 AND 1.4, TRANSITION SECTORAND OPERATION ARE INDEFINITE CAPACiTY OF GRATE INLET N SUMP FIGURE 6–2 Revision 10/6/22 24 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 10.0 DROP INLETS IN SUMPS ,IZ b v \ 11 by\\ hI$2,JPal AREA FOR 1 FT LENGTH OF OPENING CURB INLETS Y = Depth of Flow a = Cutter Drop h = Throat Opening 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 HEAD IN FEET CAPACITY OF DROP INLETS ANDCURB INLETS IN SUMPS FIGURE Revision 10/6/22 25 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual (r)LEI0Z 0 i=–[khz cr)a3 cr)-a CO 10 SH I B0 C)E OC0 Cr)1-LLI ZI Z <a <LL)IaFa2 --) 0C) [-LLILLIIcr)aC)ncaZ0 0C) F-<(F--)a > B~nSEehL=F(E b/n itBlaZ<[ \D cr)1-LLI-JZ Lf) onncT)C) 0F-r n E : ai fU y 1g COMPUTATIONSHEET6-1 Revision 10/6/22 26 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual b) Inlets on Grade The capacity of a curb inlet on grade will be based on the following equation7. Q/Lo = 0.7[1/yo] [(H)5/2-(a)5/2] Where: Q = Discharge into inlet in cfs. L, = Length of inlet opening in feet H = a + y, a = Gutter depression in feet y, = Depth of flow in approach gutter in feet The curve shown in Figure 64 provides for the direct solution of the above equation when the value of y, is known. The curve shown in Figure 6-5 provides for the determination of the ratio ofthe intercepted flow by the inlet to the total flow in the gutter. In order to facilitate the computations required in determining the various hydraulic properties for curbinlets on grade, Computation Sheet 6-2 has been prepared. Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Inlet Type and number Location of inlet by station number. Drainage Area designation of area entering between the previous pick up point and the inlet being designed. Peak Discharge (Qp) from area of Column 3. Carry-over flow (q) which has been passed by the last preceding inlet to the inlet under consideration. Total gutter flow (Q,) in cfs. For inlets other than the first inlet in the system, total gutter flow is the sum of the runoff from the contributing area plus carry-over flow from the inlet or inlets upstream. Column 4 plus Column 5. Reciprocal of the pavement cross slope for pavements with straight crown slopes. Reciprocal of the pavement cross slope (Z) divided by the pavement roughness coefficient (n) Slope of approach gutter (S,) in ft. per ft, Depth of gutter flow " y, " in approach gutter from Figure 5-3. Figure 5-4. or Appendix B solution or direct from Manning’s equation for triangular gutters: y, = 1.245 (Q 3/8)[n3/8/S3/16] [1/Z]3/8 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Column 9 Column 10 Revision 10/6/22 27 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Column 11 Spread of water (Sp) or width of ponding in the gutter measured from the face of curb. Column 7 times Column 10 (Figure 5-3 or Appendix B). Width of street and height of parabolic crown. Slope of approach gutter (So) in ft. per ft. Depth of gutter flow " y, " in approach gutter from Figure 5-4 or Appendix B. Column 15 Spread of water (Sp) or width of ponding in the gutter measured from face of curb from Figure 5-4 or Appendix B. Discharge in cubic feet per second (Q) which will be intercepted by an inlet one foot in length for a given depth of flow in the approach gutter (y,). Determined from Figure 6-4 or from the solution of the following equation: Q/Lo = 0.7[1/y,] [(H)5/2-(a)5/2] Column 17 Length of inlet (L,) in feet which is necessary to intercept a given discharge Q,. Column 6 divided by Column 16. Actual length (L) in feet of inlet which is to be provided. Ratio of the length of inlet provided (L), to the length of the inlet required for 100% interception (L,). Column 18 divided by Column 17. Percentage of discharge intercepted by the inlet in question determined from Figure 6-5 using the values determined in Column 19 and Column 10 or Column 14. Discharge (Q) in cubic feet per second which the inlet in question actually intercepts. Column 6 times Column 20. Carry-over flow (q) is the amount of water which passes any inlet, and is the difference between the total flow (Q,) of Column 6 and the intercepted flow (Q) of Column 21. Column 12 Column 13 Column 14 Column 16 Column 18 Column 19 Column 20 Column 21 Column 22 Revision 10/6/22 28 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual ban.ag E : 1iGo gHiBF fr a=FB=[ Revision 10/6/22 29 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 1.00 q,= O.7(+)(HS/? a5/2) GUTTER DEPRESSION DEPTH OF FLOW CAPACITY FOR !hILETS GRADE 01 05 .06 08 .10 DEPTH OF FLOW (y)FIGURE Revision 10/6/22 30 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 a\ 0.5a 0.4 0.3 L = Length of curb opening (ft.>La = Length of curb opening for 1002interception <ft.)Q ; Flow intercepted by inlet of length'L' (c.f.s.)Qa = Total flow in approach gutter <c.f.s.)a = Gutter depression (ft.)y = Depth of flow in approach gutter <ft.) 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 L / L. 0,7 0.8 0.9 1,0 RATIO OF INTERCEPTED FLOW TO TOTAL FLOW FOR INLET ON GRADE FIGURE 6–5 Revision 10/6/22 31 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual E. Storm Drain Pipe Design 1. Design Frequency Pipe Design: flood mitigation storm event 2 Design Criteria a)Storm drain systems capable of conveying the flood mitigation storm event are required when water spread, intersection cross flow, and lot to lot drainage flow limits are exceeded, or when the minimum time of concentration shown in Table 1.5 of the iSWM TM Hydrology Technical Manual Document are reached. Closed pipe systems are required for discharges up to andincluding 300 cfs in public systems. b) Pipe material in a public storm drain system or in public right-of-way shall be reinforced concrete for all pipe sizes with appropriate bedding and class type depending on cover. c) Proposed storm drains may discharge into existing watercourses. See Section 1.2.10 of theiSWMTM. Hydraulics Technical Manual Document for guidance related to the Tailwaterelevation to be used for hydraulic grade line calculations. d) The maximum hydraulic gradient shall not produce a velocity that exceeds 15 feet per second (fps). Table 3.8 shows the desirable velocities for most storm drainage design. Storm drainsshall be designed to have a minimum mean velocity flowing full at 2.5 fps. Table 3.8 Desirable Velocity in Storm Drains Description Culverts (All types) Inlet laterals Collectors (up to 24”) Mains (Larger than 24”) Maximum Desirable Velocity 15 fps No Limit 15 fps 12 fps e) The minimum desirable physical slope shall be 0.5% or the slope that will produce a velocityof 2.5 feet per second, as required, for the Streambank Protection Storm when the culvert is flowing partially full, whichever is greater. O The potential hydraulic grade line elevation shall not exceed ground elevation or the gutter flow line, whichever is lowest. g) Access junction boxes are required at intermediate points along straight runs of closedconduits. Table 3.9 gives maximum spacing criteria. Table 3.9 Access Junction Box Spacing Criteria Pipe Size (inches) 18-36 42” and Larger Maximum Spacing (feet) 600 1000 Revision 10/6/22 32 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual h)Junction Boxes shall also be located at: • • • • • • • • any point where three or more drainage conduits (laterals or trunk lines) come together; trunk line size changes where either the inlet pipe or outlet pipe is greater than 24 inchesin diameter; pipe junctions involving a pipe with at least 36 inches in diameter; grade changes; the upstream end of the storm drain system; Bends greater than 30 degrees; Pipe junctions greater than 45 degrees; At the connection point between public and private storm sewer pipes or boxes. If thisconnection point is in the public right-of-way, pipe materials on the private system mustmeet public storm drain system materials requirements. If the connection point is on private property, then the public portion of the system must be contained in an easement. i)Inlets will not be allowed to serve as a junction box. Under special circumstances the City Engineer or designee may allow an inlet to serve as a junction box. Where inlets are permitted to serve as a junction box, the width of the inlet, at a minimum, shall be doubled in size. Storm drain systems parallel to the street will not be permitted to run directly through inlets. i)Bends without junction boxes shall be limited to 30 degrees or less. k) Pipe junctions without junction boxes shall be limited to 45 degrees or less. I) The minimum storm drain pipe diameter shall be eighteen (18) inches. m) Pipe diameters shall not decrease downstream. n)Manufactured Pipe inverts at change in sizes should be set at the same elevation. o) A prefabricated eccentric reducer shall be used when pipe size changes are required on trunk lines between 18-inch and 24-inch diameter pipes. Cast-in-place pipe collars are not allowed. p) Laterals shall be connected to collector or main lines using manholes or manufactured wye connections. Special situations may require laterals to be connected to the trunk lines by a cut- in (punch-in), and such cut-ins must be approved by the City Engineer or designee. q) Vertical or horizontal curves in the conduit will not be permitted. F.Parking Lot Design Parking lots shall be designed for the flood mitigation storm not to exceed top of curb with a maximumdepth at low points of one (1) foot. The flood mitigation storm shall be contained on-site or withindedicated easements. The portion of the parking lot below the lowest curb elevation may be considered as part of the detention calculation for the site. G. Driveway Culverts. Driveway culverts are only permitted in non-curbed roadway sections. All driveway culvert constructionshall be inspected by the City during construction. Public Works Inspection Department will notapprove the driveway approach formwork for concrete pours until the driveway culvert, ditch survey, Revision 10/6/22 33 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual and material invoice have been reviewed and accepted by the Drainage Department. All driveway culverts shall meet the following requirements: 1 All new driveway culverts will be designed to convey the flood mitigation storm. Replacementdriveway culverts shall be designed to convey the maximum reasonable discharge based on theexisting ditch dimensions adjacent to the culvert. 2 3. Culverts shall have a minimum pipe diameter of 18 inches Acceptable Culvert Material shall be Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) (Class III minimum) (18” to42” diameter) 4. 5. 6. Box culverts shall have a minimum height of 24”. Culverts under City streets used for entrancesto a subdivision shall be made of approved classes of reinforced concrete pipe or box. The top of pipe elevation must be at or below the adjacent roadway edge of pavement elevation. Pipe culverts shall utilize a safety end treatment conforming to the most current version of TexasDepartment of Transportation (TxDOT) standard detail SETP-PD with the slope of the rip-rap being6:1 7.A driveway approach may utilize a low water crossing in lieu of a driveway culvert if all of the following conditions are met: 1. 2. The lowest elevation of the proposed crossing can be no more than 8 inches below theroad edge elevation . The proposed low water crossing cannot create a ponding effect on the upstream ditch(i.e., ditch flow line must be equal to or higher than the crossing). 3. Minimum cross slope for the crossing of 1 .5%. 4. Low water crossing shall be constructed of concrete adhering to City of Denton drivewayapproach standards. 5. Toe walls on each side of the crossing shall be extended at least 15” below grade to prevent undercutting . 8.Culverts Slope requirements: i. Must provide positive drainage Culvert slope shall be set as shown on the approved subdivision construction plans iii. Minimum slope shall be 0.3% 9.Ditch Slope requirements: 1. 11. 111. The ditch shall be graded upstream and downstream as far as necessary to provide positive drainage with no areas of standing water. Minimum earthen slope is 0.5% Minimum concrete slope is 0.3% for 2-foot concrete pilot channels if 0.5% earthen isunobtainable. 3.3.3 Hydraulic Design Criteria for Structures A. Introduction This section is intended to provide design criteria and guidance on several on-site flood mitigationsystem components, including culverts, bridges, vegetated and lined open channels, storage design,outlet structures, and energy dissipation devices for outlet protection. B. Open Channels Revision 10/6/22 34 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 1. Design Frequency a) Open channels, including all natural or improved channels, swales, and ditches shall be designed for the flood mitigation storm event 2 Design Criteria a) Depending on velocities (See Table 3.11 ), constructed or improved channels shall be designedwith either an earthen channel or a 10-ft minimum concrete pilot channel section and appropriate side slope protection up to the streambank protection elevation, as described inSection 3.2.1. b) All channels with contributing drainage basins larger than one square mile shall remain in theirnatural condition. C)Channels with a contributing drainage area of less than one square mile shall remain in theirnatural condition if they are identified as being within an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) by the current City of Denton ESA map. Channels not identified as being within an ESA maybe channelized, with the channelization method being determined by analysis of the erosivevelocities d)All improved channels shall be designed to carry the flood mitigation flow and shall have onefoot of freeboard as illustrated in Figure 8-1. Freeboard requirements at bends in all improved channels shall be the greater of the following: 1. One (1 ) foot or 2. Ten (10) percent of the flow depth e) D g) h) At a minimum, channels that require concrete lining shall be lined up to an elevation of thewater surface resulting from the flood mitigation storm. Unlined improved channels that contain bends may be required to be armored if maximumpermissible velocities are exceeded. Unlined improved channels shall have side slopes no steeper than 4:1 and concrete linedchannels shall have side slopes no steeper than 2:1. The minimum grade allowed on any channel, outfall channel or ditch shall be three-tenths footper one hundred (100) feet for concrete lined channels and five-tenths foot per one hundred (100) feet for grass lined channels. i) i) k) Geotechnical investigations will be required for open channel designs, except in cases wherethe City Engineer or designee deems it not necessary. For vegetative channels, flow velocities within the channel shall not exceed the maximumpermissible velocities given in Tables 3.10 and 3.11. If relocation of a stream channel is unavoidable, the cross-sectional shape, meander, pattern, roughness, sediment transport, and slope shall conform to the existing conditions insofar aspracticable. Energy dissipation will be necessary when existing conditions cannot beduplicated. I) An evaluation of streambank stabilization shall be included in the design of open channelimprovements for areas upstream and downstream of the proposed improvement. Whereindicated by the analysis, stabilization of the offsite bank areas shall be included in theproposed design. m) HEC-RAS, or similarly capable software approved by the entity with jurisdiction, shall be usedto confirm the water surface profiles in open channels. n) The final design of artificial open channels shall be consistent with the velocity limitations for Revision 10/6/22 35 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual the selected channel lining. Maximum velocity values for selected lining categories arepresented in Table 3.10. 0)If relocation of a stream channel is unavoidable, fill material into Waters of the United States must comply with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Provide either proof of mitigation orletter of permission from the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The design of stable rock riprap lining depends on the intersection of the velocity (local boundary shear)and the size and gradation of the riprap material. More information on calculating acceptable riprap velocitylimits is available in Section 3.2. 7 of the /SWM TM Hydraulics Technical Manual Document, Revision 10/6/22 36 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Table 3.10 Roughness Coefficients (Manning’s n) and Allowable Velocities for NaturalChannels Channel Description Max. Permissible Manning’s n 1 Channel Velocity (ft/s) MINOR NATURAL STREAMS Fairly regular section 1. Some grass and weeds, little or no brush 2. Dense growth of weeds, depth of flow materially greater than weed height 3. Some weeds, light brush on banks 4. Some weeds, heavy brush on banks 5. Some weeds, dense willows on banks For trees within channels with branches submerged at highstage, increase above values byIrregular section with pools, slight channel meander,increase above values by Floodplain – Pasture 0.030 3 to 6 3 to 6 3 to 6 3 to 6 3 to 6 0.035 0.035 0.050 0.060 O.OIO 0.010 1. Short grass 0.030 0.035 3 to 6 3 to 62. Tall grass Floodplain – Cultivated Areas 1. No crop 0.030 0.035 0.040 0.050 0.120 3 to 6 3 to 6 3 to 6 3 to 6 3 to 6 2. Mature row crops 3. Mature field crops Floodplain - Uncleared 1. Heavy weeds scattered brush 2. Wooded MAJOR NATURAL STREAMS Roughness coefficient is usually less than for minor streams of similar description on account of less effective resistanceoffered by irregular banks or vegetation on banks. Values of"n" for larger streams of mostly regular sections, with noboulders or brush UNLINED VEGETATED CHANNELS Range from0.028 to 0.060 3 to 6 Clays (Bermuda Grass) Sandy and Silty Soils (Bermuda Grass) 0.035 0.035 5 to 6 3 to 5 UNLINED NON-VEGETATED CHANNELS Sandy Soils Silts 0.030 0.030 0.030 1.5 to 2.5 0.7 to 1.5 2.5 to 3.0 3.0 to 5.0 5.0 to 6.0 Sandy Silts Clays Coarse Gravels 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.025 Shale Rock 6.0 to 10.0 15 For natural channels with specific vegetation type, refer to Table 3.11 for more detailed velocity control. Revision 10/6/22 37 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Table 3.11 Maximum Velocities for Vegetative Channel Linings Maximum Velocity= (ft/s) Bermuda grass Bahia Tall fescue grass mixtures:3 0-10 0-5 5-10>10 0-515-10 Kentucky bluegrass Buffalo grass Grass mixture Sericea lespedeza, Weeping lovegrass, Alfalfa Lapped sod 1 Do not use on slopes steeper than 10% except for side-slope in combination channel2 Use velocities exceeding 5 ft/s only where good stands can be maintained3 Mixtures of Tall Fescue. Bahia, and/or Bermuda 4 Do not use on slopes steeper than 5% except for side-slope in combination channel5 Annuals - used on mild slopes or as temporary protection until permanent covers are established. Source: Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control in Georgia, 1996. Buffalo Grass and Grass Mixture will be required over other vegetation types where the maximum velocityis not exceeded . Revision 10/6/22 38 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual DRAINAGE EASEMENT [ I'O FOOT FREEBOARDT: (MIN FLOOD MITIGATION FLOW FLAT BOTTOM TYPICAL IMPROVED CHANNEL WITH CONCRETE LINING DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1– 1.0 FOOT FREEBOARD IF EROSIVE TYPICAL IMPROVED CHANNEL WITH PILOT CHANNEL LINING FREEBOARD REQUIREMENTS ANDCHANNEL SECTION ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE 8–1 Revision 10/6/22 39 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 3.3.4 Channel Drop Structures 1. 2 Sloping channel drops are permitted and are required to have a maximum slope of 4:1 . Vertical channeldrops are not permitted. The flow velocities in the channel upstream and downstream of the drop structure need to satisfy thepermissible velocities allowed for channels (Table 3.10). The velocities shall be checked for flowsproduced by the streambank protection and flood mitigation frequency events. 3.An apron shall be constructed immediately upstream of the chute or stilling basin to protect against the increasing velocities and turbulence which result as the water approaches the drop structure. The apronshall extend at least five (5) feet upstream of the point where flow becomes supercritical. In no case shall the length of the upstream apron be less than ten (10) feet. 4.An apron shall be constructed immediately downstream of the chute or stilling basin to protect againsterosion due to the occurrence of the hydraulic jump. The apron shall extend a minimum of ten (10) feet beyond the anticipated location of the jump. 5 6. 7. 8. The design of drop structures is based on the height of the drop, the normal depths upstream and downstream of the drop structure and discharge. When used, channel drop structures shall be located near bridges or culverts, as directed by the City Engineer or designee. The location of the hydraulic jump should be determined based on the upstream and downstream flowdepths and channel slopes. The length of the hydraulic jump should be calculated to determine the length of the downstream apronrequired to prevent erosion. 3.3.5 Maintenance Access 1 Access areas and ramps shall be provided for all publicly maintained channels to allow for maintenanceof the channels. Access areas shall have a width of at least fifteen (15) feet and a cross slope nogreater than 2%. 2.Access easements shall be provided from the Public Right of Way to the Access area if the accessarea is not directly connected to the public right-of-way. Access easements shall remain free ofobstacles that block the use of the easement, including ungated fencing across the easement. 3.Access to all improved channels shall be provided by one (1 ) of the following methods, as approvedby the City Engineer or designee. a) By providing a combination of the bottom access and clear access on one (1 ) side of the channel,if the depth of the channel will allow maintenance from the top of the channel. b) For channels exceeding a depth of four (4) feet or four (4) to one (1) side slopes, clear accessin an easement shall be provided on both sides of the channel where none of the other methods would be sufficient to provide for maintenance of the channel access area. 4 All lined channels, and earthen channels with concrete pilot channels shall have a minimum bottomwidth of ten (10) feet and shall be provided with concrete access ramps located as directed by the City Engineer or designee. Concrete access ramps shall not be less than twelve (12) feet wide,with a maximum slope of six (6) to one (1 ) and maximum cross slope of 5%. All access roadsshall be located within a dedicated easement. Access road pavement cross-section shall conform to the standards of the concrete alley section detail located in the City of Denton Standard Details Revision 10/6/22 40 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 3.4 Culverts Culverts are cross drainage facilities that transport runoff under roadways or other improved areas. A.Design Frequency 1.Culverts shall be designed for the flood mitigation storm. Consideration when designing culvertsincludes: roadway type, tailwater or depth of flow, structures, and property subject to flooding, emergency access, and road replacement costs. 2.The flood mitigation storm shall be routed through all culverts to be sure building structures (e.g.,houses, commercial buildings) are not flooded or increased damage does not occur to the highway or adjacent property for this design event. B.Design Criteria 1. Velocity Limitations a) The maximum velocity shall be consistent with channel stability requirements at the culvertoutlet b) C) The maximum allowable velocity is 15 feet per second, but outlet protection shall be provided where discharge velocities will cause erosion conditions. To ensure self-cleaning during partial depth now, a minimum velocity of 2.5 feet per second isrequired for the streambank protection storm when the culvert is flowing partially full. C.Headwater Limitations 1. The allowable headwater is the depth of water that can be ponded at the upstream end of the culvert during the flood mitigation storm event, which will be limited by one or more of the followingconstraints or conditions: a) Headwater will be non-damaging to upstream property. b) Culvert headwater plus 12 inches of freeboard shall not exceed top of curb or pavement forlow point of road over culvert, whichever is lower. D. Tailwater Considerations 1. If the culvert outlet is operating with a free outfall, the critical depth and equivalent hydraulic gradeline shall be determined. 2.For culverts that discharge to an open channel, the stage-discharge curve for the channel must be determined. See Section 2. 1.4 of the /SWM TM Hydraulics Technical Manual Document on methodsto determine a stage-discharge curve. 3. 4 If an upstream culvert outlet is located near a downstream culvert inlet, the headwater elevation of the downstream culvert will establish the design tailwater depth for the upstream culvert. If the culvert discharges to a lake, pond, or other major water body, the expected flood mitigationstorm event of the water body will establish the culvert tailwater. E.Other Criteria 1. 2. 3. Culvert skews shall not exceed 30 degrees as measured from a line perpendicular to the roadwaycenterline without approval. Reinforced concrete pipe shall be required for culverts. Erosion, sediment control, and velocity dissipation shall be designed in accordance with Section 4,0 of the /SWM TM Hydraulics Technical Manual Document. Revision 10/6/22 41 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 3.5 Bridges A. Design Frequency1. Flood mitigation storm for all bridges B Design Criteria 1. A freeboard of two-foot shall be maintained between the computed design water surface and thelow chord of all bridges. 2.Design guidance is in Section 3.4 of the /SWM TM Hydraulics Technical Manual Document. 3.6 Detention Facilities A.Design Frequency 1. Detention facilities shall be designed for the four storms (water quality, streambank protection,conveyance, and flood mitigation storms) for the critical storm duration that results in the maximum(or near maximum) peak flow. B.Design Criteria 1. 2. Dry detention basins are sized to temporarily store the volume of runoff required to provide floodprotection up to the flood mitigation storm. Routing calculations must be used to demonstrate that the storage volume and outlet structureconfiguration complies with Section 3.2.2.2 of the Stormwater Design Criteria Manual. Outletstructures shall be designed per Section 2.2 of the Hydraulics Technical Manual . Refer to Section2.2.3 of the Hydraulics Technical Manual for design of extended detention (for Water Quality)outlets 3 4. 5. Private Detention Basins shall be designed with a 10-foot wide unobstructed maintenance accessaround the entire perimeter of the pond. Public Detention Basins shall be designed with a 20-foot wide unobstructed maintenance access around the entire perimeter of the pond. No earthen (grassed) embankment slopes shall exceed 4:1. Concrete lined embankment slopesshall not exceed 2:1 slope. Vertical walls may be allowed but must be structurally designed toaccount for inundation of the base and drawdown upon pond draining and must have a six-footsecurity fence at the top. 6. 7. 8 The side slope for any excavated detention basin, which is not in rock shall not exceed a 4:1 slope. A freeboard of 1-foot will be required between the flood mitigation storm water surface elevationand top of bank. A calculation summary shall be provided on construction plans as found on computation sheet 10-1 or equivalent. Stage-storage-discharge values shall be tabulated and flow calculations fordischarge structures shall be shown on the construction plans. Detention design shall followiSWMTM guidelines. It is the responsibility of the Engineer of Record to use appropriatemethodologies presented in iSWMTM based on specific basin characteristics. Detailed calculations and a design narrative shall be provided for review in a supplemental report that is referenced onthe construction plans. In general, the narrative shall provide basic design information, such ashydrologic method applied, design assumptions, pre- and post-development site conditions,downstream constraints, environmental considerations and design software version used, ifapplicable Revision 10/6/22 42 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 9. An emergency spillway shall be provided at the flood mitigation maximum storage elevation withsufficient capacity to convey the flood mitigation storm inflow rates with six inches of freeboard.Spillway requirements must also meet all appropriate state and Federal criteria. 10. The emergency spillway shall be constructed of concrete, unless the City Engineer or designeeapproves alternative materials. 11. All detention basins shall be designed with plantings that minimize erosion based on expectedinundation frequencies. Design guidance is provided in the iSWM TM Landscape Technical ManualDocument. 12. Design calculations will be provided for all spillways and outlet structures. 13. Storage and dam safety design may be subject to the requirements of the Texas Dam SafetyProgram based on the volume, dam height, and level of hazard. Earthen embankments 6 feet inheight or greater shall be designed per Texas Commission on Environmental Quality guidelines fordam safety (see the Texas Administrative code, Title 30, Part 1 , Chapter 299 Dams and Reservoirs for current dam safety criteria). 14. Armored slopes shall be no steeper than 2:1. 15. The embankment crown width shall be determined based on a geotechnical investigation of thedetention facility site. Minimum width shall be 12 feet. 16. Earthen embankments used to impound detention water must have a non-permeable core andshall be based on a geotechnical investigation of the site. The geotechnical investigation shall be performed by a licensed engineer and shall include at a minimum the type of material on-site (orother material to be used in the embankment), moisture content, liquid limit, plasticity index, andrequired compaction. 17. Where deemed necessary by the City Engineer or designee, security fencing with a minimum height of 6 feet shall encompass the detention storage area if the velocity, depth, or slopes createa potentially dangerous condition. The fence shall be designed to allow access for maintenanceand so as not to restrict stormwater flow into or out of the detention basin. Unless approved by theCity Engineer or designee, a maintenance equipment access ramp shall be provided for alldetention facilities. The slope of the ramp shall not exceed 6:1 and the minimum width shall be 12feet 18. Bottom slopes should not be less than one (1%) percent. 19. Concrete pilot channel at least ten (10) feet wide, and a minimum slope of 0.5 percent shall beconstructed in the bottom of the detention pond. Privately maintained ponds shall have a concretepilot channel with a minimum width of six (6) feet. 20. Limited recreational equipment (such as picnic tables or playground equipment) and trees may be permitted in private detention facilities with the following restrictions: a) b) C) Provide user access at a maximum 10% slope in at least two locations (or one location thatcomprises not less than 20% of the perimeter of the facility); No recreational equipment is permitted in any portion of the facility that lies more than 18”below the flood mitigation level of the facility; Recreational structures such as picnic tables, playground equipment, etc. must be rustresistant, and anchored to the ground; d) e) Mulch, wood chips, gravel or rubberized pellets will not be permitted within the detention facility due to the likelihood of floating into the outlet structure; If recreational equipment is installed in the detention pond, the area designated for recreationaluse must be delineated with a post & cable fence (or other means as approved by the City Revision 10/6/22 43 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Engineer), with signs warning users of the danger of proceeding beyond the allowable limits.No chain link fence will be allowed in the detention pond; D g) Trees, shrubs and other woody vegetation will not be permitted in the embankment of anydetention facility, nor within the maintenance access area around the facility; Isolated trees, a maximum of one per 5,600 square feet, may be permitted in the recreationalarea of the pond as described above. A trash rack will be necessary to prevent clogging ofthe outlet structure. No bark mulch will be permitted around the trees. 21. All private detention basins shall require an Operation and Maintenance Manual submitted at time of building permit submittal or with the publicly reviewed engineering plans. Private detentionbasins shall be inspected by Public Works Inspection to ensure conformity to the design standardsrequired by Section 7.5.3.F of the Denton Development Code (DDC). Current inspection fees will apply 22. Use of parking lot surface area as detention is permitted, but only up to the lowest curb elevationof the parking lot. 3.6. 7 Outlet Structures for Detention Facilities A.Design Frequency 1. 2 3. 4. Water Quality Streambank protection storm Conveyance storm Flood mitigation storm B. Design Criteria 1. Estimate the required storage volumes for water quality, streambank protection, conveyance storm,and flood mitigation. 2. Outlet velocities shall be within the maximum allowable range based on channel material as shownin Tables 3.10 and 3.11. 3. 4. Design necessary outlet protection and energy dissipation facilities to avoid erosion problems downstream from outlet devices and emergency spillway(s). Perform buoyancy calculations for the outlet structure and footing to ensure the outlet structure will not float. Flotation will occur when the weight of the structure is less than or equal to the buoyant force exerted by the water. 5 Any outflow structure, which conveys water through the embankment in a conduit shall be reinforced concrete, designed to support the external loads. The conduit shall withstand the internal hydraulic pressure without leakage under full external load or settlement and must convey water at the design velocity without damage to the interior surface of the conduit. 6.The minimum pipe size and box size shall meet the following requirements (these minimum sizes apply even when used in conjunction with weirs or other flow control devices, and must be accessible for maintenance): Revision 10/6/22 44 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Outlet Pipe and Box SizeMiniMDischarge Pipe Length Size 100 feet or less 18 inches 36 inchesGreater than 100 feet Minimum Box Size 2 feet x 2 feet 3 feet x 3 feet 7. 8 Minimum opening of inlet shall be 6 inches in diameter or 6“ x 6“ square. Smaller inlet openings may be used with junction box and properly sized outlet structure. A concrete headwall and wingwalls shall be constructed at the outlet pipe opening. Orientation ofthe wingwalls will be governed by site specific conditions. Headwalls and wingwalls shall be designed to Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) standards. 9 Design guidance is in Section 2.2 of the /SWM TM Hydraulics Technical Manual Document. Revision 10/6/22 45 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual IB :: gJ k o g 0He = 0 .E a)E A & AON inD ldJ N91s]a COMPUTATIONSHEET 10–1 Revision 46 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 3.7 Energy Dissipation All drainage system outlets, whether for closed conduits, culverts, bridges, open channels, or storage facilities,shall provide energy dissipation when necessary to protect the receiving drainage element from erosion. A. Design Frequency1. Flood mitigation storm B.Design Criteria1. Energy dissipaters are engineered devices such as rip-rap aprons or concrete baffles placed at theoutlet of storm water conveyance systems for the purpose of reducing the velocity, energy andturbulence of the discharged flow. 2. Erosion problems at culvert, pipe and engineered channel outlets are common. Determination ofthe flow conditions, scour potential, and channel erosion resistance shall be standard procedurefor all designs. 3. Energy dissipaters shall be employed whenever the velocity of flows leaving a stormwatermanagement facility exceeds the erosion velocity of the downstream area channel system. 4. Energy dissipater designs will vary based on discharge specifics and tailwater conditions. 5. Outlet structures shall provide uniform redistribution or spreading of the flow without excessiveseparation and turbulence. C. Recommended Energy Dissipaters for outlet protection include the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. Concrete or grouted rock rip-rap apron Riprap outlet basins Baffled outlets Grade Control Structures Design guidance is provided in Section 4.0 of the /SWMTM Hydraulics Technical Manual Document. Revision 10/6/22 47 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 3.8 3.8. 7 Floodplain Floodplain Development Criteria The following decision chart is intended to consolidate the floodplain development criteria in the City of Denton. It references information found in the Denton Development Code (DDC) Subchapters 7.4 and 7.5, Chapter 30 of the Denton Municipal Code, and this Criteria Manual. It is not to be considered an exhaustive list of criteria but is only to be used as guidance to the information provided in the above-referenced documents. Criteria in those documents supersedes this decisionchart Proposed Project Greater Than or Equal To One Square Mile What is the Size of the DrainageArea? Less Than One Square Mile Developed Stream Habitat Condition (DDC 7.4) Undeveloped DeveloDed Stream Habitat Condition (DDC 7.4) Undeveloped Hardship Variance Required for Floodplain Alteration Alternate ESA and Hardship Variance Required for Floodplain Alteration Floodplain AlterationAllowed Alternate ESA Required for Floodplain Alteration • No Rise in Fully Developed WSEL • No FloodwayAlteration • No Valley Storage Loss • No Adverse Impact • Comply with ESA Riparian and/orWater Related Regulations• FEMA CLOMR/LOMR •Set Fully Developed BFE (No Rise) Establish Floodplain Establish FtoodwayMaximum 15% Valley Storage Loss No Adverse Impact Comply with ESA Riparian and/orWater Related Regulations CLOM R/LOMR orFlood Studv Set Fully Developed BFE (No Rise) Establish Floodplain Establish FloodwayMaximum 15% Valley Storage Loss No Adverse Impact Comply with ESA Riparian and/orWater Related Regulations CLOMR/LOMR OR Flood Study • • 8 No Rise in Fully Developed WSEL Minor Fill (50 CY) No FloodwayAlteration No Valley StorageLoss No Adverse Impact Comply with ESA Riparian and/orWater Related Regulations FEIVIA CLOMR/LOM R Revision 10/6/22 48 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 3.8.2 Procedures for Floodplain Alteration of Drainage Areas with One SquareMile or Less. Fill and alteration of floodplains, containing drainage areas one (1) square mile or less, when itis not unreasonably damaging to the environment, is permitted where it will not create other floodproblems. The following are the engineering criteria for such requests. A. FEMA Submittal. Developments which impact designated Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplains in the City (Zones AE, A, X shaded ) will be required to submit the minimum data which shall be sent to FEMA for conditional approval of the proposed project. The ConditionalLetter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be submitted to the City prior to approval of any preliminaryplat. Approval of (CLOMFI) from FEMA will be required prior to acceptance of a final plat. 1. A written description of the scope of the proposed project and the methodology used to analyzethe project’s effects. 2. Hydraulic backwater models of the 10, 50, 100, and 500-year flood for the following: a)Duplicate of the effective Flood Insurance Study (FIS) model; 1.Existing conditions (effective FIS model including cross-sections through the project site. All cross-sections should reflect conditions prior to construction of the project); 11.Proposed conditions (existing conditions model reflecting the proposed project); and 3.Floodway hydraulic backwater models of the following: a) Duplicate effective; a ) Existing condition; and b) Proposed conditions. 4. 5. A copy of the Flood Insurance Rate Map with the project area indicated. Topographic mapping of the entire area covered by the proposed condition model, indicating thelocations of all cross-sections used in the hydraulic model and delineating the proposed 100-year flood plain boundary. 6.Topographic mapping of the entire area covered by the proposed conditions model, indicatingthe locations of all cross-sections used in the hydraulic model and delineating: a) The proposed 100-year and 500-year floodplain boundaries; and b) The proposed floodway boundary. 7. 8. Certification that the project meets the requirements of the 44 Code of Federal Regulations 60.3(d) (2) Upon completion of the proposed project, “as-built” and final LOMR plans certified by aregistered professional engineer shall be submitted to the City for review and subsequent transmittal to FEMA. FEMA requires that individual legal notices be sent to all affected propertyowners when developments (cut or fill) occurs in the regulatory floodway that would cause any rise in the 100-year FIS water surface elevation. Public notice in the official communitynewspaper is required for proposed modifications to the regulatory floodway. In all the abovehydraulic models, the following rules will apply: a) The hydraulic parameters, such as bridge loss coefficients, “n” values, etc., used in theeffective FIS models will only be changed where obvious errors or changes have taken Revision 10/6/22 49 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual place and must be documented . b) C) d) The computed water surface elevation profiles must converge with the existing profiles The information should be shown on a map of suitable scale and topographic definition toprovide reasonable accuracy.All items should be labeled for easy cross-referencing to the hydraulic model and summary data. 9.FEMA may have questions regarding the project. The engineer must address all of FEMA’scomments. It is not anticipated, but if revisions to the development are required by FEMA, the developer will be responsible to do so. 3.8.3 Fully Developed Water Surface Elevation Calculations. A.The following hydraulic data should be submitted to the City, preferably using the Corps HEC-RAS program to compute the channel’s water surface elevation. The data should be submittedelectronically as part of the CLOMFt, LOMR or flood study submittal. 1. 2 Duplicate of the effective City fully developed backwater model or as developed by developeror property owner and approved by the City. Modified existing condition backwater model – this model should include pre-developmentcross-sections through the project side obtained from field surveys or updated topographicinformation. 3. 4. 5. 6 7. Proposed condition reflecting the developments impact on the flood plain area. Water surface elevation and velocity summary tables tabulating the results of the above analysis. Topographic map at a suitable scale with cross-sections, existing and proposed one percentchance (100-year) fully developed flood plain delineated, and the area being developed shown. Analysis of the existing and proposed valley storage conditions of the area. Documentation from the Corps of Engineers determining if a 404 permit is required for the project. 3.8.4 Floodplain Alteration Guidelines A.Side Slopes. 1.To ensure maximum accessibility to the floodplain for maintenance and other purposes, and tolessen the probability of slope erosion during periods of high water, maximum slopes of filled area shall usually not exceed 4 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical. Grass cover is required for allcut and fill slopes unless other armoring is required. Concrete rip-rap or an approved equalerosion protection measure is required on slopes steeper than 4:1. Vertical walls, terracing andother slope treatments will be considered only as: a) Part of a landscaping plan submission, and b) if no unbalancing of stream flow results B. Vegetation/Landscaping. - Engineering plan submission shall include plans for: a) Erosion control of cut and fill slopes; b) Restoration of excavated areas; and c) Tree protection in and below fill areas. d) Landscaping should incorporate natural materials (earth, stone, and wood) on cut orfill slopes wherever possible. e) Applicant shall show in the plan the general nature and extent of existing vegetation on the Revision 10/6/22 50 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual tract, the location of trees in accordance with the requirements of the tree survey requiredby Section 7.7.4.E of the Denton Development Code (DDC), the areas which will be preserved, altered, or removed as a result of the proposed alterations. f) 9) Locations and construction details should be provided, showing how trees will be preserved in areas which will be altered by filling or paving within the drip line of those trees. Applicant shall also submit plans showing location, type, and size of new plant materialsand other landscape features planned for altered flood plain areas. 3.9 Easements and Fences A.Drainage and floodplain easements shall be provided for all open natural streams or manmadedrainage facilities. Easements shall encompass all areas lower than a ground elevation defined as being the highest of the following: 1.Fifteen (15) feet outside the calculated water surface elevation and associated flood boundarybased on a design storm whose frequency is 100 years. All contributing watersheds are to betreated as fully developed for purposes of calculating the water surface elevation . 2 3. The top of the high bank plus a minimum of 20 feet, if higher than (1 ) above. Existing natural banks with a slope steeper than 4:1 shall have the easement line no closerthan the intersection of a 4:1 line extending from the toe of the slope to the proposed grade atthe top of the bank plus an additional fifteen (15) feet. 4.Additional access area may be required according to the section below. B.Storm Drain Easements 1.Above Ground Systems. 1. Where an access road is required adjacent to a channel, an additional easement area ofa minimum width of fifteen (15) feet shall be provided. The maximum cross slopeshall be 5 percent. All access roads adjacent to improved channels shall be locatedwithin the drainage easement. 2. No driveways, sidewalks, patios, etc. shall be placed in a drainage easement exceptwhere the easement is a public or private open space or park, pedestrian and vehicleaccess may be provided as determined by the City Engineer or designee. 2.Closed Systems. a. Easements for closed drainage systems shall meet the following minimum standards,unless special circumstances warrant additional or reduced easements; as determined by City Engineer or designee: Easement Requirements for Closed Drainage Systems Minimum EasementPipe or box Size Width 36 inches and under 16 feet 20 feet42 to 54 inches 25 feet60 to 66 inches 30 feet72 inches and above Revision 10/6/22 51 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual b.Utilities such as water and sanitary sewer lines may share a portion of a drainage easement, containing an underground enclosed drainage system where an additionaleasement width for a minimum of ten (10) feet is added to create a public drainageand utility easement. No utilities shall be located in any lined channel, pipe, or box insuch a way as to interfere with flow capacity or maintenance of or access to the channel,pipe or box. C.A drainage easement shall be provided for the area within a required outfall channel orditch to the point where the flowline “day lights” on natural grade or matches existingtopography. d. e. To provide for maintenance, a drainage easement shall be provided at least twenty-five (25) feet beyond any outfall headwall. No driveways, sidewalks, patios, etc. shall be placed in a drainage easement exceptwhere storm sewer system is enclosed and is designed for 100-year storm, unlessthis easement serves a positive emergency overflow route. C Detention Facilities Easements 1. Detention facility easements must encompass the entirety of the detention facility plus anyrequired maintenance access areas adjacent or leading to the facility. D. Fences 1 Fences in drainage easements are prohibited by the Denton Development Code, except asspecifically provided for below. a.Fences in drainage easements that contain an underground stormwater systemmay contain any type of non-masonry fence if the fence is constructed withknock-out panels to facilitate maintenance. b Fences in drainage easements that contain overland flow may cross the easementif the fence is constructed with wrought iron (pickets and rails), pipe, or pipe andcable. Fence height, minimum picket spacing and maximum ground clearancespacing shall be governed by appropriate child safety provisions. c. No fences are allowed across inlet or outlet structures of drainage detention facilities. Fences are permitted around the detention facility which do not block or inhibit the flow conveyance of the detention facility. d. No fencing is allowed across easements which share water or wastewaterfacilities with the drainage facility. 2. Fences in floodplain are prohibited. 3.10 Water Quality 3. 70. 7 Water Quality Protection Volume All new detention ponds must include provisions for detention of the Water Quality Protection Volume (WQ„). See the iSWMTM Water Quality Protection Technical Manual for information regarding the design of this WQ„ and appropriate discharge design. 3.10.2 Construction Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements Revision 10/6/22 52 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual All land disturbing activities must include provisions for erosion and sediment control in accordance with the Denton Development Code, Subchapter 7.3 Land Disturbing Activities, the /SWMTM Water Quality Technical Manual Document, the /SWM TM Construction Controls Technical Manual Document and /SWM TM Site Development Technical Manual Document. A. Phased erosion control plans are required. Plans must include existing and proposed contours. 1. Initial grading phase.2. Individual lot phase with behind curb controls.a. Behind the curb controls shall be installed upon completion of street segments. b. Identify areas of permanent inactivity and provide timeline for vegetative stabilization. B.Drainage area maps and calculations are required for three phases of development. Calculationsshall utilize a 2 year 24-hour storm for the design of any hydraulic component of the erosion controlplan including sediment basins, swales, channels, berm height, weir length or any other outlet or conveyance structure required by the plan. 1. Existing pre-development conditions.2. Mass graded conditions prior to public/private infrastructure installation stage. 3. Proposed post construction conditions.4. See map examples on next page C.A sedimentation basin is required where 10 acres or more drain to a common area during any phase of development, 1. Sediment basin must provide at least 3,600 cubic feet of storage per acre drained until finalstabilization of the contributing drainage area.2. Outlet structures shall be designed to provide a minimum dewatering time of 36 hours andmaximum dewatering time of 72 hours. 3. Decentralized treatment such as sediment traps may be used instead of sediment basins wherethe calculations are provided demonstrating equivalent volume treatment. D Vegetative stabilization is required for all permanent and temporary channels and basins. Plantselection guidance is provided in the iSWMTM Landscape Technical Manual Document. E.Erosion and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) design criteria shall adhere tothe most current version of the iSWM TM Construction Controls Technical Manual Document. 12.Linear projects may instead follow TxDOT standards.Proprietary erosion or sediment control devices may be utilized when:a. Independent performance data is provided to prove a demonstrated capability of meeting stormwater management efficiency equivalent to /SWM TM methods. b. System or device must be appropriate for use in North Central Texas conditions. Revision 10/6/22 53 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual 1. ExistIng pre-development conditions 2. Mass graded conditions prior to public/private infrastructure installation stage 3. Proposed post construction conditions ''''''''''''''a''''''''t ''. \/ / /\ \4.0 ac Revision 10/6/22 Stormwater Design Criteria Manual Section 4.0 /SWMTM Technical Manuals Section 4.0 of this manual identifies the technical manuals documents that govern the design and construction of stormwater drainage systems. The Stormwater Design Criteria Manual utilizes the mostcurrent version of the following eight technical manuals documents produced by the North Central TexasCouncil of Governments (NCTCOG): • • • • • • • • /SWMTM Planning Technical Manual Document /SWMTM Water Quality Technical Manual Document /SWMTM Hydrology Technical Manual Document /SWMTM Hydraulics Technical Manual Document/SWMTM Site Development Controls Technical Manual Document/SWMTM Construction Controls Technical Manual Document /SWMTM Construction Control Standard Details Technical Manual Document /SWMTM Landscape Technical Manual Document These manuals are not reproduced here but can be downloaded free of charge at the following website location: http://iswm.nctcoq.org/technical-manual.html Revision 10/6/22 55