2005-193
.
.
ORDINANCE NO. 2iJ05- /93
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE FIRM OF JAMES R.
KIRKPATRICK, INC. DBA KIRKPATRICK ARCHITECTURE STUDIO TO PROVIDE
PLANNING, DESIGN, AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF DENTON
PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY MASTER PLAN; AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS THEREFOR; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (RFP
3324 - IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $205,500).
WHEREAS, the professional services provider (the "Provider") mentioned in this
ordinance is being selected as the most highly qualified on the basis of its demonstrated
competence and qualifications to perform the proposed professional services; and
WHEREAS, the fees under the proposed contract are fair and reasonable and are
consistent with and not higher than the recommended practices and fees published by the
professional associations applicable to the Provider's profession and such fees do not exceed the
maximum provided by law; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON HEREBY ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The findings set forth in the preamble of this Ordinance are incorporated
by reference into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into a professional services
contract with James R. Kirkpatrick, Inc. dba Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio, to provide
professional planning, design, and related services for the City of Denton Public Safety Training
Facility Master Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION 3. The City Manager is authorized to expend funds as required by the
attached contract.
SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and
approval.
PASSED AND APPROVED this the l.!lf;/t day of 0Jr ,2005.
C-~ ~cL
EULINE BROCK, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPRO ED AS 0 LEGAL FORM:
EDWIN M. SNYDER, INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY
BY: or 1tt~1i!tdj
S:\OUT Documenls\OrdinancesI05\public safety training facility ordinance,doc
Page 2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY MASTER PLAN
STATE OF TEXAS ~
COUNTY OF DENTON ~
IS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the /CJf.t day of
, 2005, by and between the City of Denton, Texas, a Texas municipal
co orati , with its principal office at 215 East McKinney Street, Denton, Denton County,
Texas 76201, hereinafter called "CITY" and James R. Kirkpatrick, Inc. dba Kirkpatrick
Architecture Studio, with its corporate office at 100 West Mulberry, Denton, Denton County,
Texas 76201, hereinafter called "CONSULTANT," acting herein, by and through their duly
authorized representatives.
WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained,
the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
EMPLOYMENT OF CONSULTANT
The CITY hereby contracts with the CONSULT ANT, as an independent contractor, and
the CONSULTANT hereby agrees to perform the services herein in connection with the Project
as stated in the sections to follow, with diligence and in accordance with the professional
standards customarily obtained for such services in the State of Texas. The professional services
set out herein are in connection with the following described project:
The Project shall include, without limitation, all those services necessary to provide a
Master Plan design of the Public Safety Training Facility, including, but not limited to,
land utilization, cost savings analysis, use by public safety agencies, ingress and egress,
security and safety, energy conservation, environmental issues, use of utilities, potential
alternative future uses by CITY, and any other services as may be required by the
documents described below.
ARTICLE 2
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The CONSULTANT shall perform the following services in a professional manner:
A. The CONSULTANT shall perform all those services as necessary and as described in the
CITY's RSFP #3324 for the Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan, which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A" as if written word for word herein.
B. To perform all those services set forth in CONSULTANT's Proposal dated April 12,
2005, which Proposal is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "B" as if
written word for word herein.
C. CONSULTANT shall prepare a 20 copies of a preliminary Master Plan, which
CONSULT ANT shall review with the City Manager or his designee, other designated
members of CITY staff, and with the City Council.
D. CONSULTANT, after receiving comments on the preliminary Master Plan from the City
Manager or his designee, CITY staff, and the City Council, shall prepare 50 copies of a
final Master Plan.
E. CONSULTANT shall make prescntations on the progress of the Project before the City
Council as may be required by the City Manager or his designee.
F. If there is any conflict between the tenns of this Agreement and the exhibits attached to
this Agreement, the tenns and conditions of this Agreement will control over the terms
and conditions of the attached exhibits.
ARTICLE 3
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Additional services to be performed by the CONSULTANT, if authorized by the CITY,
which are not included in the above-described Basic Services, are described in the task orders,
which shall be attached to and made a part of this Agreement for all purposes.
ARTICLE 4
PERJOD OF SERVICE
This Agreement shall become effective upon execution of this Agreement by the CITY
and the CONSULTANT and upon issue of a notice to proceed by the CITY. CONSULTANT
shall complete the program narrative, the preliminary Master Plan, and the final Master Plan
within the time periods shown on the Master Planning Schedule, Exhibit "D", which is attached
to and made a part of this Agreement as if written word for word herein, unless the CITY
extends the time for completion of the Project. This Agreement may be sooner terminated in
accordance with the provisions hereof. The CONSULTANT shall make all reasonable efforts to
complete the services set fOlih herein as expeditiously as possible and to meet the schedule
established by the CITY, acting through its City Manager or his designee.
ARTICLE 5
COMPENSATION
A. COMPENSATION TERMS:
1. "Subcontract Expense" is defined as expenses incurred by the CONSULTANT in
employment of others in outside firms for services in the area of professional
engineering, or related services.
2. "Direct Non-Labor Expense" is defined as that expense for any assignment
incurred by the CONSULTANT for supplies, transportation and equipment,
travel, communications, subsistcnce, and lodging away from home, and similar
incidental expenses in connection with that assignment.
Page 2
B. BILLING AND PAYMENT: For and in consideration of the professional services to bc
performed by the CONSULTANT herein, the CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT,
based upon the satisfactory completion of thc Basic Services tasks set forth in the Scope
of Services as shown in Article 2 above.
1. CONSULTANT shall perform its work on this Project in accordance with the
provisions of Article 1 as defined by the scope of services of Exhibits "A" and "B"
attached hercto and incorporated herewith by reference. CONSULT ANT shall be
paid for these services a total compensation of $205,500.
2. Partial payments to CONSULT ANT will be made on the basis of detailed monthly
statements rendered to and approved by CITY through its City Manager or his
designee, based upon the proportion of the work completed under Exhibit "D".
Under no circumstances shall any monthly statement for services exceed the value of
work performed at the time a statemcnt is rendered.
3. Payments to the CONSULT ANT will be made on the basis of detailed statements
rendered to and approved by the CITY through its City Manager or his designee;
however, under no circumstances shall any statement for services exceed the value of
the work performed at the time a statement is rendered.
4. Nothing contained in this Article shall require the CITY to pay for any work which is
unsatisfactory, as reasonably determined by the City Manager or his designee, or
which is not submitted in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. The CITY
shall not be required to make any payments to the CONSULT ANT when the
CONSULTANT is in default under this Agreement.
5. It is specifically understood and agreed that the CONSULTANT shall not be
authorized to undertake any work pursuant to this Agreement which would require
additional payments by the CITY for any charge, expense, or reimbursement above
the maximum not to exceed fee as stated, without first having obtained written
authorization from the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall not proceed to perform the
services listed in Article 3 "Additional Services," without obtaining prior written
authorization from the CITY.
C. ADDITIONAL SERVICES: For additional serviccs authorized in writing by the CITY
in Article 3, the CONSULTANT shall be paid based on the Schedule of Charges at an
hourly rate shown in Exhibit "c." Payments for additional services shall be due and
payable upon submission by the CONSULTANT, and shall be in accordance with
subsection B hereof. Statements shall not be submitted morc frequently than monthly.
D. PAYMENT: Uthe CITY fails to make payments due the CONSULTANT for services
and expenses within 60 days after receipt of the CONSULTANT's undisputed statement
thereof, the amounts due the CONSULTANT will be increased by the rate of one percent
(1 %) per month from the said 60th day, and, in addition, the CONSULT ANT may, after
giving seven days' written notice to the CITY, suspend scrvices under this Agreement
until the CONSULTANT has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses,
and charges, provided, however, nothing herein shall require the CITY to pay the late
Page 3
charge of one percent (I %) set forth hcrein if the CITY reasonably determines that the
work is unsatisfactory, in accordance with this Article 5, "Compensation."
ARTICLE 6
OBSERVATION AND REVIEW OF THE WORK
The CONSULTANT will exercise reasonable care and due diligence in discovering and
promptly reporting to the CITY any defects or deficicncies in the work of the CONSULTANT or
any subcontractors or subconsultants.
ARTICLE 7
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All documents preparcd or furnished by the CONSULTANT (and CONSULTANT's
subcontractors or subconsultants) pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service, and
shall become the property of the CITY upon the termination of this Agreement. The
CONSULTANT is entitled to retain copies of all such documents. The documents prepared and
furnished by the CONSULTANT are intended only to be applicable to this Project, and CITY's
use of these documents in other projects shall be at CITY's sole risk and expense. In the event
the CITY uses any of the information or materials developed pursuant to this Agreement in
another project or for other purposes than specified herein, CONSULTANT is released from any
and all liability relating to their use in that project.
ARTICLE 8
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT shall provide services to CITY as an independent contractor, not as an
employee of the CITY. CONSULTANT shall not have or claim any right arising from employee
status.
ARTICLE 9
INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and save and hold harmless the CITY and its
officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all liability, claims, demands, damages,
losses, and expenses, including, but not limited to court costs and reasonable attorney fees
incurred by the CITY, and including, without limitation, damages for bodily and personal injury,
death and property damage, resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the
CONSULTANT or its officers, shareholders, agents, or employees in the execution, operation, or
performance ofthis Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create a liability to any person who is not
a party to this Agreement, and nothing herein shall waive any of the parties' defenses, both at
law or equity, to any claim, cause of action, or litigation filed by anyone not a party to this
Agreement, including the defense of governmental immunity, which defenses are hereby
expressly reservcd.
Page 4
ARTICLE 10
INSURANCE
During the performance of the services under this Agreement, CONSULT ANT shall
maintain the following insurance with an insurance company licensed to do business in the State
of Texas by the State Insurance Commission or any successor agency that has a rating with Best
Rate Carriers of at least an A- or above:
A. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance with bodily injury limits of not less than
$500,000 for each occurrence and not less than $500,000 in the aggregate, and with
property damage limits of not less than $100,000 for each occurrence and not less than
$100,000 in the aggregate.
B. Automobile Liability Insurance with bodily injury limits of not less than $50,000 for each
person and not less than $100,000 for each accident, and with property damage limits of
not less than $50,000 for each accident.
C. Worker's Compensation Insurance in accordance with statutory requirements, and
Employers' Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $100,000 for each accident.
D. Professional Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 annual aggregate.
E. The CONSULTANT shall furnish insurance certificates or insurance policies at the
CITY's request to evidence such coverages. The insurance policies shall name the CITY
as an additional insured on all such policies, and shall contain a provision that such
insurance shall not be canceled or modified without 30 days' prior written notice to CITY
and CONSULT ANT. In such event, the CONSULT ANT shall, prior to the effective date
of the change or cancellation, serve substitutc policies furnishing the same coverage.
ARTICLE 11
MEDIATION AND ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
The parties may agree to settle any disputes under this Agreement by submitting the
dispute to mediation or other means of alternate dispute resolution. No mediation or alternate
dispute resolution arising out of or relating to this Agreement, involving one party's
disagreement, may include the other party to the disagreement without the other's approval.
ARTICLE 12
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, either party may terminate by
giving 30 days' advance written notice to the other party.
B. This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in the event of either party
substantially failing to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. No such termination
will be affected unless the other party is givcn (I) written notice (delivered by certified
mail, return' receipt requested) of intent to ternlinate and setting forth the reasons
specifying the non-performance, and not less than 30 calendar days to cure the failure;
and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination.
Page 5
C. If the Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the services to be provided
hereunder, CONSULTANT shall immediately cease all services and shall render a final
bill for services to the CITY within 30 days after the date of termination. The CITY shall
pay CONSULT ANT for all services properly rendered and satisfactorily performed and
for reimbursable expenses to termination incurred prior to the date of termination, in
accordance with Article 5 "Compensation." Should the CITY subsequently contract with
a new consultant for the continuation of services on the Project, CONSULTANT shall
cooperate in providing information. The CONSULT ANT shall turn over all documents
prepared or furnished by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement to the CITY on or
beforc the date oftennination, but may maintain copies of such documents for its use.
ARTICLE 13
RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES
Approval by the CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed a release of the responsibility
and liability of the CONSULTANT, its employees, associates, agents, subcontractors, and
subconsultants for the accuracy and competency of their designs or other work; nor shall such
approval be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the CITY for any defect in the
design or other work prepared by the CONSULT ANT, its employees, subcontractors, agents, and
consultants.
ARTICLE 14
NOTICES
All notices, communications, and reports required or permitted under this Agreement
shall be personally delivered or mailed to the respective parties by depositing same in the United
States mail to the address shown below, certified mail, return receipt requested, unless otherwise
specified herein. Mailed notices shall be deemed communicated as of three days after mailing:
To CONSULTANT:
To CITY:
James R. Kirkpatrick, Inc. dba
Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio
100 West Mulberry
Denton, Texas 76201
City of Denton
Michael A. Conduff, City Manager
215 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76201
All notices shall be deemed effective upon receipt by the party to whom such notice is
given, or within three days after mailing.
ARTICLE 15
ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement, consisting of nine pages and three Exhibits, constitutes the complete and
final expression of the agreement of the parties, and is intended as a complete and exclusive
statement of the terms of their agreements, and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous offers,
promises, representations, ncgotiations, discussions, communications, and agreements which
may have been made in cOlmection with the subject matter hereof.
Page 6
ARTICLE 16
SEVERABILITY
If any provIsIon of this Agreement is found or deemed by a court of competent
juri~diction to be invalid or unenforceable, it shall be considered severable from the remainder of
this Agreement and shall not cause the remainder to be invalid or unenforceable. In such evcnt,
the parties shall reform this Agreement to rcplace such stricken provision with a valid and
enforceable provision which comes as closc as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken
provIsIOn.
ARTICLE 17
COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, rules,
regulations, and ordinances applicablc to thc work covered hcreundcr as they may now read or
hcreinafter be amcnded.
ARTICLE 18
DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED
In performing the services required hereunder, the CONSULTANT shall not discriminate
against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age, or
physical handicap.
ARTICLE 19
PERSONNEL
A. The CONSULTANT represents that it has or will secure, at its own expense, all
personnel required to perform all the services required under this Agreement. Such
personnel shall not be employees or officers of, or have any contractual relations with the
CITY. CONSULTANT shall inform the CITY of any conflict of interest or potential
conflict of interest that may arise during the term of this Agreement.
B. All services required hereunder will bc performed by the CONSULTANT or under its
supervision. All persOlmel engaged in work shall be qualified, and shall be authorized
and permitted under state and local laws to perform such services.
ARTICLE 20
ASSI GNABlLITY
The CONSULT ANT shall not assign any intercst in this Agrcement, and shall not
transfer any interest in this Agreement (whethcr by assignment, novation, or otherwise) without
the prior written consent ofthc CITY.
ARTICLE 21
MODIFICATION
No waiver or modification of this Agrcell1ent or of any covenant, condition, or limitation
herein contained shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by the party to bc charged
therewith, and no evidence of any waiver or modification shall be offered or received in evidence
Page 7
in any proceeding arising between the parties hereto out of or affecting this Agreement, or the
rights or obligations of the parties hereunder, and unless such waiver or modification is in
writing and duly executed; and the parties further agree that the provisions of this section will not
be waived unless as set forth herein.
ARTICLE 22
MISCELLANEOUS
A. The following exhibits are attached to and made a part of this Agreement: Exhibit A,
RSFP #3324 for the Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan; Exhibit B,
CONSULTANT's Proposal; Exhibit C, Schedule of Charges; and Exhibit D, Master
Planning Schedule.
B. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY shall, until the expiration of three years after the final
payment under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly
pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the CONSULT ANT involving
transactions relating to this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees that CITY shall have
access during normal working hours to all necessary CONSULTANT facilities and shall
be provided adequate and appropriate working space in order to conduct audits in
compliance with this section. CITY shall give CONSULTANT reasonable advance
notice of intended audits.
C. Venue of any suit or cause of action under this Agreement shall lie exclusively in Denton
County, Texas. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Texas.
D. For the purpose of this Agreement, the key persons who will perform most of the work
hereunder shall be James R. Kirkpatrick. However, nothing herein shall limit
CONSULTANT from using other qualified and competent members of its firm to
perform the services required herein.
E. CONSULTANT shall commence, carryon, and complete any and all projects with all
applicable dispatch, in a sound, economical, and efficient manner and in accordance with
the provisions hereof. In accomplishing the projects, CONSULTANT shall take such
steps as are appropriate to ensure that the work involved is properly coordinated with
related work being carried on by the CITY.
F. The CITY shall assist the CONSULT ANT by placing at the CONSULTANT's disposal
all available information pertinent to the Project, including previous reports, any other
data relative to the Project, and arranging for the access thereto, and make all provisions
for the CONSULTANT to enter in or upon public and private property as required for the
CONSULT ANT to perform services under this Agreement.
G. The captions of this Agreement are for informational purposes only, and shall not in any
way affect the substantive terms or conditions of this Agreement.
Page 8
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the City of Denton, Texas has caused this Agreement to be
cxecuted by its duly authorized City Manager, and CONSUL/~ has executed this Agreement
through its duly authorized undersigned officer on this thc day of ~ I r '
2005.
MICHAEL A. CONDU
CITY MANAGER
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
By~~J (n~ ~A
APPRO D AS TO LEGAL FORM:
EDWIN M. SNYDER, INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY
BY: /,r4Jd/t4
JAMES R. KIRKPATRICK, INC. DBA
KIRKPATRICK ARCHITECTURE
STUDIO
WITNESS:
BY: (~lfi" '. ~,rt.. .....-
S:\Our Documenls\Comracts\05\public training facility.doc 6
Page 9
Exhibit A
Purchasing Department
901-8 Texas St.
Denton; TX 76209
(940) 349-7100
RFSP #3324
For
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
and Fire Station #7 Desiqn
PROPOSALS DUE: April 12, 2005
2:00 P.M.
Proposal submitted by:
Company Name
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A Project Title:
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
B. Project Location:
South West Comer of Bonnie Brae and Vintage Par\..'Way
City and County of Denton
State of Texas
C. Project Intent:
1. The City of Denton has purchased 88-acres for a combined Public Safety
Training Facility and Fire Station #7 on the south west comer of Bonnie Brae
and Vintage Parkway,
2, The City of Denton ("Owner") is in the process of selecting an
architectural/engineering firm for the development of a Public Safety Training
Facility Master Plan and Fire Station #7 design and construction. This joint
project is unique in that it will develop a Master Plan for a Police Department
and Fire Department Training Facility with training and administrative offices,
firing range, bum building, fire tower, driving track and classrooms and a large
community/training room along with the design and construction of an
operational and fully functioning modem fire station.
3. The selected Proposer will be required to work closely with the Owner
throughout the process as we]] as effectively interacting and communicating
with members of a select Police Department, Fire Department and North Central
Texas College (NCTC) Design Team.
A. Therefore, the selected Proposer must include a combination of experience in
public facility/fire station design and construction as well as complex combined
training facilities for public safety departments, including state of the ali firing
ranges, There is nothing in this Request for Proposal that would limit the
Proposer from forming a team that meets the combination of successful
expenence in fire station design and comprehensive public safety training
facilities.
D. Estimated Project Budget:
Page 2
C.\",,,h\t:ltnc: c:p1=rl.nnn_'".lQQO\<<?;1P"hlir '::::,:,fotll_c::.btinn 7 rlnr.
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
1. The total currently available project budget = $4.35 million
2. Additional budgeted project funds in 2006/2007 = $8,2 million,
3. Forecast additional project funds in 2010 = $8,0 minion.
II. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SCOPE OF SERVICES:
A Provide an services to complete the project including:
1. Master Plan Design of project and phased in approach to the Public Safety
Training Facility based on budget and operational considerations including but
not limited to:
a. Land utilization
b. Cost savings/analysis
c. Shared use by public safety agencies
d. Access and egress
e, Security and safety
f. Energy conservation
g. . Environment issues
h. Use of utilities including water, natural gas, fiber, telephone, etc.
1. Potential a1temative future uses by the City of Denton.
2. Design Development for Fire Station #7: Not limited to but to include
designing the building in relationship to Operations and Maintenance cost and
efficiencies related to the building being a valuable useable facility for future
years (30 years plus).
3. Construction Documents for Fire Station #7: To include written documentation
from the State of Texas concerning the waiver of i'UlA requirements and/or
confirming that all drawings and' documents meet ADA requirements and
guidelines before bidding the project.
4. Specification (Statement of Probable Costs) for Fire Station #7: To include
construction estimates but not limited to exterior landscaping, utilities, electrical,
water and fumiture installation costs. Also the estimat<;s of Operations and
Maintenance annual costs to operate the new building, maintaining the building,
and securing the building in a safe manner, i.e" may include fiber, telephone
utility,
5. Satisfying all City and State planning and building requirem<;nts.
Page 3
.<:':"\nrr.h\Rln~ SPFr:\?nnn_:iCjCjQ\?::\?4Pllh\ir: S;:JfRtv-SI;:!tion 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
6. Examining possibilities of designing facilities based on the principles of
sustainability and energy conservation.
7. Bidding for construction will be sent out and received by the City of Denton
Purchasing Department as per State statute.
The recommended firm will be expected to attend: numerous City of Denton Facilities
Ma.'1agement Department meetings, some Community meetings, some PlatU1ing and
Zoning Committee meetings and some City of Denton City Council meetings.
B, Contents of Proposal:
The architect/engineer's information should be concise and may be supported by any
exhibits that demonstrate the f='s (team's) qualifications and experience in building
fire stations and preserving historical buildings. The information should address the
following:
1. Credentials of the architect/engineer (team) that will be directly involved in the
project for Fire Station #7 and the Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan,
2. A description of the procedure in which the architect/engineer (team) will work
with City staff
3, A description of the procedure in which the architect/engineer (team) will work
with City Departments including the Police Department, Fire Department and
Facilities Management along with any consultants specialized in specific design
elements of the project
4. A list of related projects and clients that may be contacted for additional
information.
5. Demonstrated experience in sustainable design.
6. How thc architect/engineer (team) will accomplish the project specifically
building a modem state of the art fully operational fire station along with a
comprehensive state of the art public safety training facility.
7. Architect may be required to use the City of Denton assigned mechanical
engIneer.
C, Architectural Design Scope of Work for Fire Station #7:
1. A flre station, which includes the following:
Page 4
S"\nrr.h\RIDS SPEC\300Q-3999\3324Public Safety-Station 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
a, FOUT bay apparatus room - 4,800 square feet:
. 1 engine/quint company
. 1 brush apparatus
. 1 ambulance company
. 1 reserve engine
. 1 training engine
. 1 reserve ambulance
b. Living quarters for up to 8 24-hour shift persOlmel- 8,000 square feet.
c, Dormitory quarters for:
. 1 station captain
. 2 drivers
. 5 firefighters
. 4 recruit firefighters
d. Offices for:
. 1 station captain
. 1 for 3 work stations
. Lobby into fire station
.e. 1,000 square foot community/training room,
C. Master Plan Scope of Work for Public Safety Training Facility:
1. Burn building
. 12,000 square feet
. Computer controlled
. Multi-station
. Meets all safety standards
2, Fire Tower/outside training
. 5 stories
. Haz mat area
. Drafting pit
. Gasoline tanker prop
. Fire pit
. Concealed space rescue
. Swift water rescue
3, Public Safely Training Facility of 36,600 square feet.
Page 5
.~'\nrrh\p.lns SPFr.nflon-:\R~R\;J~24Public Safety-Station 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
a, Police Department, Fire Depanment and NCTC Training and
Administration offices:
(1) Offices for approximately 8 administrative and training staff from
the Police Department, Fire Department and NCTC.
(2) A large conference room, small meeting room and break area and
suitable restroom/locker facilities.
b. Classroom facility:
(1) Large community/training stadium seating classroom suitable for
100 occupants in a large college-type atmosphere.
(2) 4 classrooms of 1,100 square feet each suitable for 36 students
each. (Total of 4,400 square feet).
(3) 4 classrooms of 600 square feet each suitable for 20 students
each, (Total of 2,400 square feet).
(3) Locker room suitable for 40 males and 30 females.
(4) Fitness facility of 6,000 square feet
c. "Dirty" room(s) for crews in training.
d, Parking for 100 vehicles.
4. Firing range:
. Training room of 800 square feet.
. Ammunition and Firearms storage of 300 square feet.
. Rest rooms of 300 feet each for total of 600 square feet.
. Office of 100 square feet.
. 20 shooting stations
. Control booth
. Sniper range
. Shoot house
. Sound reduction considerations
. Environmental considerations
5. Driving track:
. Driving track of 117,750 square feet.
"Emergency driving training range extension to shooting range of 97,500
square feet
Page 6
S:\orch\BIDS SPEC\300Q-3999\3324Public Safety~Station 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
. Additional 96,800 square feet future expansion
6. Public Safety Communications and City Emergency Operations Center.
7, Develop a phased in approach to the Public Safety Training Facility based on
possible budget and use scenarios,
D A copy of the City's Standard Agreement for Architects Services is attached,
E Comply with ADA regulations, City ordinances, Planning and Development Code and
all Fire and Bu{lding codes,
, F. Construction administration will be completed by the City of Denton Facilities
Management Department.
G. Produce budget information and cost estimates for Fire Station #7 prior to bid and as
needed before beginning construction.
IV. SELECTION PROCESS
A. Receipt of Proposals:
One (1) original copy and six (6) copies of the proposal must be submitted on or before
April 12, 2005 at 2:00 p.m to:
City of Denton
Purchasing Department
Attention: Tom D. Shaw, Purchasing Agent
901 B Texas Street
Denton, Texas 76209.
The envelope .:ontaining the proposals shall be sealed and bear the name and address of
the Proposer and shall be plainly marked as follows:
B. Basis of Proposal Comparison/Evaluation:
Proposals will be compared/evaluated on the basis of the following:
Page 7
~'\nr...h\p.lnc: _c:pl=r.\.':I.nnn_,:\QqQ\::\~?.1f::llhlir ~;:dpt\J_~.:a;:o.jinn 7 rlnr.
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
1. Proposer's previous successful history master planning joint use comprehensive
public safety training facilities including but not limited to bum buildings, fire
training towers, classrooms, driving tracks and firing range designs = 25%
2. Proposer's previous successful project history with public facilities and
especially fire station design and construction = 35%
3, Demonstrated ability to work successfully with local-jurisdictions with their
unique development plans and building process = 10%
4. Qualification ofthe Proposer and ability to perform the work = 20%
5. Creative approach = 10%
Interviews will be conducted by an evaluation committee, who will then make the
final recommendation to City Officials for approval.
C. Method of Award:
L Following the deadline for receipt of proposals, ,all proposals submitted will be
analyzed and reviewed by Owner. The Owner reserves the right not to accept
any proposal, or to reject any or all proposals 3l1d to waive defects or
irregularities in any proposal, at its discretion, The Owner will select the
Proposer, who at the sole discretion of the Owner, is the most responsible and
beneficial Proposer to the Owner and will then have the right to negotiate a
contract based on all factors involved in the proposal.
2. After selection, the successful Proposer and the Owner will then negotiate and
complete all necessary documentation and contracts. During contract development
and negotiation, the successful Proposer shall not contact any Owner official except
the individual designated to act on the Owner's behalf during this process. If a
successful agreement cannot be reached with the first selected Proposer, the Owner
will then negotiate with the next Proposer and continue this process until an
acceptable agreement is reached.
Page 8
S'\nrr,h\Rlf)S SPEr:\::!onO-3999\3324Public Safety-Station 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
SA..l\1PLE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of
, 20 , by and between the City of Denton, Texas, a Texas
municipal corporation, with its principal office at 215 East McKinney Street, Denton, Denton
County, Texas 76201, hereinafter called "Owner" and Firm, with
its corporate office at hereinafter called "Design Professional," acting
herein, by and through their duly authorized representatives.
In consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto do
mutually agree as follows:
SECTION 1
EMPLOYMENT OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
The Owner hereby contracts with the Design Professional, a licensed Texas architect or
engineer, as an independent contractor. The Design Professional hereby agrees to perform the services
as described herein and in the Proposal, the General Conditions, and other attachments to this
Agreement that are referenced in Section 3, in connection with the Project. The Project shall include,
without limitation, (describe the Project in the space below or in an attachment)
Page 9
S'\nr~h\Rln~ SPFr;\:1nnn-:1!=l~q\::l:124Publir: S?ofp;\v-Stntion 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
SECTION 2
COMPENSATION
The Owner shall compensate the Design Professional as follows:
2.1 BASIC SERVICES
2.1.1 For Basic Services the total compensation shall be $
2.1.2 Progress payments for Basic Services shall be paid in the following percentages for
of the total compensation for the Basic Services satisfactorily completed at the end of the
following phases of the Project:
Schematic Design Phase %
Design and Development Phase %
Construction Documents Phase _%
Bidding Phase _%
Construction Phase %
2.2 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
2.2.1 Compensation for Additional Services is as follows:
Principals
Associates
Technical Staff
Clerical Staff
$_ per hour
_ per hour
_ per hour
_ per hour
2.2.2 Compensation for Additional Services of consultants, including additional structural,
mechanical and electrical engineering services shall be based on a multiple of _ times the
amounts billed to the Design Professional for such additional services.
2.3 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Reimbursable Expenses shall be a multiple of _ times
the expenses incurred by the Design Professional, the Design Professional's employees and
consultants in the interest of the Project as defined in the General Conditions but not to exceed
a total of $ without the prior written approval of the Owner.
Page 10
~'\nrr:h\RlnS SPF.:D~nnn-::l~g9\3324Public Safety-Station 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
SECTION 3
ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement includes this executed agreement and the following documents all of which are
attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as if fully set forth herein:
1. City of Denton General Conditions to Agreement for Architectural or Engineering
Services.
2, The Design Professional's Proposal
3, Attachments _ through _'
This Agreement is signed by the parties hereto effective as of the date first above written.
CITY OF DENTON
BY:
MICHAEL A. CONDUFF
CITY MANAGER
ATTEST:
JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY
BY:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL 'FORM:
HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY
BY:
DESIGN FIRM
BY:
Firm's Officer/Representative
WITNESS:
BY:
Page 11
S:\orch\BtDS SPEC\3000-3999\3324Public SafetY-Station 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
CITY OF DENTON
GEl>;EI<AL COl>;D1TIONS
TO
AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL OR ENGINEERING SERVICES
ARTICLE 1, ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
1.1 The Architect or Engineer's services consist of those services for the Project (as defined in the agreement (the "Agreement") and
proposal (the "Proposal") 10 which these General Conditions are attached) performed by the Architect or Engineer (hereinafter called the
"Design Professional") or Design Professional's employees and consultants as enumerated in Articles 2 and 3 of these General
Conditions as modified by the Agreement and Proposal (the "Services")
1.2 The Design Professional will penorm all Ser..!ices as an independent contractor to the prevailing professional standards consistent
with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing in the same locality under
similar conditions, including reasonable, informed judgments and prompt timely actions (the "Degree of Care"). The Services shall be
periormed as expeditiously as is consistent with the Degree of Care necessary for the orderly progress of the Project. U~on request of
the Owner, the Design Professional shall submit for the Owner's approval a schedule for the performance of the Services which may be
adjusted as the Projeci proceeds, and shall include allowances for periods of time required for the Owner's review and for approval of
submissions by authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. Time limits established by this schedule and approved by the Owner shall
not, except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Design Professional or Owner, and any adjustments to this schedule shall be
mutually acceptable to both parties.
ARTICLE 2 SCOPE OF BASIC SERVICES
2.1 BASIC SERVICES DEFINED The Design Professional's Basic Services consist of those described in Sections 2.2 through 2.6 of
these General Conditions and include without limi:ation normal structural. civil, mechanical and electrical engineering services and any
other engineering services necessal)' to produce a complete and accurate set of Construction Documents, as described by and required
in Section 2.4. The Basic Services may be modified by the Agreement.
2.2 SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE
2.2.1 The Design Professional, in consultation with the Owner, shall develop a written pro;)ram for the Project to ascertain
Owner's needs and io establish the requirements for the Project.
2.2.2 The Design Professional shall provide a preliminal)' evaluation of the Owner's program, construction schedule and
construction budget requirements, each in te11Tls of the other, subject to the limitations set forth in Subsection 5.2.1.
2.2.3 The Design Professional shall review with the Owner alternative approaches to design and construction of the Project.
2.2.4 Based on the mutually agreed-upon program, schedule and construction budget requirements, the Design Professional
shaH prepare, for approval by the Owner, Schematic Design Documents consisting of drawings and other documents illustrating
the scale and relationship of Project components. The Schematic Design shall contemplate compliance with all applicable lav.'s,
statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations.
2.2.5 The Design Professional shall submit to the Owner a preliminary detailed estimate of Construction Cost based on current
area, volume or other unit CDSts and which indicates the cost of each category of work involved in constructing the Project and
establishes an elapsed time factor for the period of time from the commencement to the completion of construction.
2,3 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE
2.3.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Documents and any adjustments authorized by the Owner in the program,
schedule or construction budget, the Design Professional shall pre;Jare for approval by ttle Owner, Design Development
Documents consisting of drawings and other documents to fix and describe the size and character of the Project as to
architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical systems, materials and such other elements <:IS may be appropriate, which
shall comply with all applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. Notwithstanding Owner's approval of the
documents, Design Professional represents that the Documents and specifications will be sufficient and adequate to fulfill the
purposes of the Project.
2.3.2 The Design Professional shall advise the Owner of any adjustments to the pre liminal)' estimate of Construction Cost in a
further Detailed Statement as described in Section 2.2.5.
2.4 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE
2.4.1 Based on the approved Design Development Documents and any further adjustments in the scope or quality of the Project
or in the construction budget authorized by the Owner, the Design Professional shall prepare, for approval by the Owner,
Page 12
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
Consiruclion Documents consisting of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail requirements for the construction of the
Project, which shall comply with all applicable laws, siatutes, ordinances, codes and regulations.
2.4.2 The Design Professional shall assist the Owner in the preparation of the necessary bidding or procurement information,
bidding or procurement forms, the Conditions of the contract, and the form of Agreement between the Owner and contractor.
2.4.3 The Design Professional shall advise the Owner of any adjustmenis to p,evious preliminary estimaies of Construction Cost
ir,dicaled by changes in requirements or general market condiuons.
2.4.4 The Design Professional shall assist the Owner in connection with the Owner's responsibility for filing documents required
for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project.
2.5 CONSTUCTION CONTRACT PROCUREMENT
2.5.1 The Design Professional, following the Owners approval of the Construction Documents and of the latest preliminary
detailed estimate of Constructioil Cost, shall assist the Owner in procuring a construction contract for the Project through any
procuremen~ method that is legally applicable to the Project including without limitallon, the com;:Jetitive sealed bidding process.
Although the Owner will consider the advice of the Design Professional, the award of the construction contract is in the sole
discreDon of the Owner.
2.5.2 If the consll1Jction contract amount for the Project exceeds the total construction cost of the Project as set forth in the
approved Detailed Statement of Probable Construction Costs of the Project submitted by the Design Professional, then the
Design Professional, at its sole cast and expense, will revise the Construction Oocumenls as may be required by the Owner to
reduce or modify the quantity or quality of the work so that the total construction cost of the Project will not exceed the total
construction cost set forth in the approved Detailed Statement of Probable Construction Costs.
2,6 CONSTRUCTION PHASE. ADMINISTRATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
2.6.1 The Design Professional's responsibility to provide Basic Services for the Construction Phase under this Agreement
commences with the award of the Contract for Construction and terminates at the issuance to the Owner of the final Certificate
for Payment, unless extended under the tenns of Subsection 8.3.2.
2.6.2 The Design Professional shall provide detailed administration of the Contract for Construction as set forth below. For
design professionalss the administration shall also be in accordance with AI?, document A201, General Conditions of the Con-
tract for Construction, current as of the date of the Agreement as may be amended by the City of Denton special conditions,
unless otherwise provided in the Agreement. For engineers the administration shall also be in accordance wah the Standard
Specifications for Public Works Construction by the North Central Texas Council of Governments, current as of the date of the
Agreement, unless otherwise provided .m the Agreement.
2.6.3 Construction Phase duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of the Design Professional shall not be restricted,
modified or extended without written at)reement of the Owner and Design Professional.
2.6.4 The Design Professional shall be a representative of and shall advise and consult with the Owner (1) during construction,
and (2) at the Owne;"'s direction from time to time during the correction, or warranty period described in the Contract for Construc-
tion. The Design Professional shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in the .A.greement and
these General Conditions, unless othervvise modified by written instrument.
2.6.5 The Design Professional shall observe the construction site at least one time a week, while construction is in progress, and
as reasonably necessary while construction is not in progress, to become familiar with the progress and quality of the work
completed and to determine if the work is being perfonned in a manner indicating that the work when completed will be in accord-
ance with the Contract Documents. Design Professional shall provide Owner a written report subsequent to each on-site visit.
On the basis of on-site observations the Design Professional shall keep the Owner informed of the progress 2nd quality of the
work, and shall exercise the Degree of Care and diligence in discovering and promptly reporting to the Owner any observable
defects or deficiencies in the work of Contractor or any subcontractors. The Design Professional represents that he will follow
Degree of Care in performing a\l Services under the Agreement. The Design Professional shall promptly correct any defective
designs or specifications furnished by the Design Professional at no cost to the Owner. The Owner's approval, acceptance, use
of or payment for all or any part of the Design Professional's Services hereunder or of the Project itself shall in no way alter the
Design Professional's obligations or the Owner's rights hereunder.
2.6.6 The Design Professional shall not have control over or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means,
methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work. The Design
Professional stlall not be responsible for the Contractor's schedules or failure to carry out the work in accordance with the
Contract Documents except insofar as such failure may result from Design Professional's negligent acts or omissions. The
Design Profession['J1 shall not have control over or charge of acts or omissions of the Contractor, Subcontractors, or their agents
or employees, or of any other persons perfolTlllng portions of the work.
Page 13
C:'\nrrh\Rln~ .C:;PFr.nnnn_:lQQq\::\~?.1Pllhlir. S;:tfp.tv-Sl;:ttinn 7Jlnr.
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
2.6.7 The Design Proiessional shall at all limes have access to the work wherever it is in preparation or progress_
2.6.8 Except as may otherwise be ;xovided in the Contract Documents or when direct communications have been specially
authorized, the Owner and Conlracior shall communicate through the Design Professional. Communications by and with the
Design Professional's consuli.ants shall be through the Design Professional.
2.6.9 Based on the Design Professional's observations at the sile of the work and evaluatJons oi the Contractor's .b,pplications for
Payment, the Design Professional shall review and certify Ule amounts due the Contracior.
2.6.10 The Design Professional's certification for payment shall constitute a representation to the Owner, based on the Design
Professional's observaiions at the site as provided in Subsection 2.6.5 and on tile data comprising the Cont,actor's ,A.pplication
for Payment, that the work has progressed to the point indicated and that the quality of the Work is in accordance with the
Contract Documents. The foregoing representations are subject to minor deviations from the Contract Documents correctable
prior to compleiion and to specific qualifications expressed by the Design Professional, The issuance of a Certificate for Payment
shall furthe, c::mstitute a representation that the Contractor is enlltled to payment in the amount certified. However, the issuance
of a Certificate for Payment shall not be a representation thal the Design Professional has (AI) reviewed construction means,
methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or (2) ascertahed how or for what pu,pose the Contractor has used money
previously paid on account of the Contract Sum,
2.6.11 The Design Professional shall r,ave the responsibility and authority to reject work which does not conform to the Contract
Documents. Whenever the Design Professional considers it necessary or advisable for implementation of the intent of the
Cont,act Documents, the Design Professional will have authority to require addiiional inspection or testing Df the work in
accordance v..~th the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not such Work is fabricated, installed or completed.
However, neither this authority of tile Design Professional nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not exercise
such autilority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Design Professional to the Contractor, Subcontractors, material and'
equipment suppliers, their agents or employees or other persons performing p:lrlions of the work.
2.6.12 The Design Professional shall review and approve or take other appropriate action upon Contractor's submittals such as
StlOp Drawings, Product Data and Samples for the purpose of (1) determining compliance with applicable laws, statutes,
ordinances and codes; and (2) determining whether 0; not the work, when completed, will be in compliance with the requirements
of the Contract Documents. The Design Professional shall act with such reasonable promptness to cause no delay in the work or
in the construction of the Owner or of separate contractors, while allowing sufficient time in the Design Professional's professional
judgment to permit adequate review. Review of such submittals is not conducted for the pu.pose of ,determining the accuracy
and completeness oi other details such as dimensions and quantities or for substantiating instructions for installation or perfor-
mance of equipment OJ" systems designed by the Contrac1Dr, all of which remain the responsibility of the Cont,actor to the extent
required by the Contract Documents. The Design Professional's review shall not constitute approval of safet';..' precautions or,
unless otherwiSE specifically stated by the Design Professional, of construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or
procedures, The Design Professional's approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is
3 component. When professional certification of petiormance characteristics of materials, systems or equipment is required by
the Contract Documents, the Design Professional shall be entitled to rely upon such certification to establish that the materiats,
systems or equipment will meet the performance criteria required by the Contract Documents.
2.6.13 The Design Professional shall prepare Change Orders and Construction Change Directives, with supporting
documentation and data if deemed necessary by the Design Professional as provided in Subsections 3. i.1 and 3.3.3, for the
Owner's approval and execution in accordance with the Contract Documents, and may authorize minor changes in the work not
involving an 2djustmenl in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time which are not inconsistent with L1e intent of the
Contract Documents.
2.6.14 On behalf of the Owner, the Design Professional shall conduct inspections to determine the dates of Substantial
Completion and Final Completion, and if requested by the Owner shall issue Certificates of Substantial and Final Completion.
The Design Professional will receive and review written guarantees and related documents required by the Contract for
Construction to be assembled by the ContractOl and shall issue a final certificate for Payment upon compliance with the
requirements of the Contract Documents.
2.6.15 The Design Professional shall interpret and provide recommendations on matters concerning performance of the Owner
and Contracior under the requirements of the Contract Documents on written request of either tne Owner or Contractor. The
Design Professional's response to such requests shall be made with reasonable promptness and within any time limits agreed
upon.
2.6.16 Inlerpretations and decisions of the Design Professional shall be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable
from the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of d.awings. When making such interpretations and initial
decisions, the Desi;;)n Professional s\lall endeavor to secure faithful performance by both Owner arld Contractor, and sllall not be
liable for results or interpretations or decisions so rendered in good faith ill accordance witll all the provisions of this Agreement
and in Ihe absence of negligence.
Page 14
~'\nrr.h\RlnS ~PFr:\?,nnn-1!=lqq\:<':1?4Pllhlir, S::1fp.tv-Strltinn 7.o0C
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
2.6.17 Tne Design Professional shall render wrinen decisions within a reasonable time on al! claims, disputes or other matters in
question between the Owner and Contractor relating to the execution or progress of the worK as provided in the Contract
Documents.
2.6.18 The Design Professional (1) shall render services under the Agreement in accordance with the Degree of Care; (2) will
reimburse the Owner for all damages caused by the defective designs the Design Professional prepares; and (3) by
acknowledging payment by the Owner of any fees due, shall not be released from any rights the Owner may have under the
Agreement or diminish any of the Design Professional's obligations thereunder.
2.6.19 The Design Proiessional shall provide the Owner with jour selS of reproducible prinls showing all significant changes to
the Construction Documents during the Construction Phase.
ARTICLE 3 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
3.1 GENERAL
3.1.1 The services described in this Article 3 are not included in Basic Services unless so identified in the Agreement or
Proposal, and they shall be paid for by the Owner as provided in the Agreement, in addition to the compensation for Basic
Services. The services described under Sections 3.2 and 3.4 shall only be provided if authorized or confirmed in writing by the
Owner. If services described under Contingent Additional Services in Section 3.3 are required due to circumstances beyond the
Design Professional's control, the Design ?rofessional shall notify tile Owner in writing and shall not commence such additional
services until it receives written approval from the Owner to proceed. If the Owner indicates in writing tilat all or part of such Con-
tingent Additional Services are not required, the Design Professional shall have no obligation to provide those services. Owner
will be res;JOnsible fo~ compensating the Design Professional for Contingent Additional Services only if they are no! required due
to the negligence or fault of Design Professional.
3.2 PROJECT REPRESENTATION BEYOND BASIC SERVICES
3.2.1 If more extensive representation at the site than is described in Subsection 2.6.5 is required, the Design Professional shall
provide one or more Project Representatives to assist in carrying out such additional on-site responsibilities.
3.2.2 Project Representatives shall be selected, employed and directed by the Design Professional, and the Design Proiessional
shall be compensated therefor as agreed by the Owner and Design Professional.
3.3 CONTINGENT ADDITIONAL SERVICES
3.3.1 Making material revisions in Drawings, Specifications or other documents when such revisions are:
1. inconsistent wilh approvals or instructions previously given by the Owner, including revisions made
necessary by adjustments in the Owner's program or Project budget;
2. required by the enactment or revision of codes, laws or regulations subsequent to the preparation of such
documents, or
3. due to changes required as a result of the Owners failure to render decision in a timely manner.
3.3.2 Providing services required because of significant changes in the Project including, but not limited to, size, quality,
complexity, or the Owner's schedule, except for services required under Subsection 2.5.2.
3.3.3 Preparing Drawings, Specifications and oHler documentation and supporting data, and providing other services in connec-
tion with Change Orders and Construction Change Directives.
3.3.4 Providing consultation concerning replacement of work damaged by fire or other cause during construction, and furnishing
services required in connection with the replacement of such work.
3.3.5 Providing services made necessary by the default of the Contractor, by major defects or deficiencies in the work of the
Contract:Jr, or by failure of periormance of either the Owner or Contractor under the Contract for Construction.
3.3.6 Providing services in evaluating an extensive number 01 claims submitted by the Contractor or others in connection with tile
work.
3.3.7 Providing services in connection with a public hearing, arbitration proceeding or legal proceeding except where the Design
Professional is party thereto.
Page 15
S:\orch\B1DS SPEC\3000-3999\3324Public Safety-Station 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
3.3.8 Providing services in addition 10 those required by Ariicie 2 ior preparing documents br alternate, separate or sequential
bids or providing services in connection with bidding or construction prior to the complelion of the Construction Documents
Phase.
3.3.9 Notwithstanding anything contained in the Agreement, Proposal or these General Conditions to the contrary, all services
described in this Article 3 that are caused or necessitated in whole or in part due to the negligent act or omission of the Design
Professional shall be performed by the Desi;jn Proiessional as a part of the Basic Services under the Agreemen~ with no
additional compensation above and beyond the compensation due the Design Professional for the Basic Services. The
intervening or concurrent negligence of the Owner shall not limit the Design Professional's obligat'ions under this Subsection
3.3.9.
3.4 OPTIONAL ADDiTIONAL SERVICES
3.4.1 Providing financial feasibility or other special studies.
3.4.2 Providing planning surveys, site evaluations or comparative studies of prospective sites.
3.4.3 Providing special surveys, environmental studies and submissions required for approvals of governmental authoriiies or
others having jurisdiction over the Project.
3.4.4 Providing services relative to future facilities, systems and equipment.
3.4.5 Providing services to investigate existing conditions or facilities or to make measured drawings thereof.
3.4.6 Providing services to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information furnished by the Owner.
3.4.7 Providing coordination of construction performed by separate contractors OJ by the Owner's own forces and coordination of
services required in connection with construction performed and equipmeni supplied by t18 Owner.
3.4.8 Providing detailed quantity surveys or inventories of material, equipment and labor.
3.4.9 Providing analyses of operating and maintenance costs.
3.4.10 Making investigations, inventories of materials or equipment, or valuations and detailed appraisals of existing facilities.
3.4.12 Providing assistance in the utilization of equipment or systems such as testing, adjusting and balancing, preparation of
operation and maintenance manuals, training personnel for operation and maintenance and consultation during operation.
3.4.13 Providing interior design and similar services required for or in connection with the selection, procurement or installation of
furniture, furnishings and related equipment
3.4.14 Providing services other than as provided in Section 2.6.4, after issuance to the Owner ofthe final Certincate for Payment
and expiration of the Warranty period of the Contract for Construction.
3.4.15 Providing services of consultants for other ir,an architectural, civil, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering por~
tiolls of the Project provided as a part of Basic Services.
3.4.16 Providing any other services not otherwise included in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in accordance with
generally accepted architectural practice.
3.4.17 Preparing a sel of reproducible record drawings in addition to those required by Subsection 2.6.19, showing significant
.changes in the work made during construction based on marked-up prints, drawings and other data furnished by the Contra::::tor
to the Design Professional.
3.4.18 Notwithstanding anything contained in the Agreement, Proposal or these General Conditions to the contrary, all services
described in this Article 3 thai are caused or necessitated in whole or in part due 10 the negligent act or omission of the Design
Professional shall be pertormed by the Design Professional as a part of the Basic Services under the Agreement with no
additional compensation above and beyond the compensation due the Design Professional for the Basic Services. The
intervening or concurrent negligence of the Owner shall not limit the Design Professional's obligations under this Subsection
3.4.18.
ARTICLE 4 OWNER'S RESPONSiBILITIES
Page 16
S:\prch\BIDS SPEC\300Q.3999\3324Public Safety~Station 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
4.1 The Owner shall consult with the Design Proiessional reg3rding requirements lor the Projecl, including (1) Ine Owner's
objectives, (2) schedule and design constraints and criteria, including space requirements and relationships, flexibility,
expendability, special equipment, systems and site requirements, as more specifically described in Subsection 2.2.1.
4.2 The Ol/mer shall establish and update an overall budget for the Project, including the Construction Cost, the Owner's other
casts and reasonable contingencies related to all of these costs.
4.3 If requeste::J by the Design ?rofessional, the Owner shall furnish evidence that flncmcial arrangements have been made to
iulflll the Owner's obligations under this Agreement
4.4 The Owner shall designate a representative authorized to act on the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project. The Owner
or such authorized re;Jresentative shall render decisions in a timely manner pertaining to documents submitied by the Design
Professional in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the orderly and sequential progress of the Design Professional's services.
4.5 V"/here applicable, the O\l'iner shall furnish surveys describing physical characteristics, legal limitations and utility locations for
the site of the Project, and a written legal description of the site. The surveys and legal information shall include, as applicable,
grades and lines of streets, alleys, pavements and adjoining property and structures: adjacent drainage: rights-of-way,
restrictions, easements, encroachments, zoning, deed restrictions, boundaries and contours of the site: locations, dimensions and
necessary data per..aining to existing buildings, other improvements and trees; and information concerning available utility
services and lines, both public and private, above and below grade, including inverts and depths. All the information on the
survey shall be referenced to a project benchmark.
4.6 Where applicable, the Owner shall furnish the services of geotechnical engineers when such services are requested by the
Design Professional. Such services may include but are not limited to test bonngs, test pits, determinations of soil bearing
values, percolation tests, evaluations of hazardous materials, ground corrosion and resistivity tests, including necessary
operations for anticipating sub-soil conditions, with reports and appropriate professional recommendations.
4.6.1 The Owner shall furnish the services of other consultants when such services are reasonably required by the scope of the
Project and are requested by the Design Professional and are not retained by the Design Professional as part of its Basic
Services or Additional Services.
4.7 When not a part 01 the Additional Services, the Owner shall furnish structural, mechani.:al, chemical, air and water pollution
tests, tests of hazardous materials, and other laboratory and environmental tests, inspections and reports required by law or the
Contract Documents,
4.8 The Owner shall furnish all legal, accounting and insurance counseling services as may be necessary at any time for the
Project, including auditing services the Owner may require to verify the Contractor's Applications for Payment or to ascertain how
or for what purposes the Contractor has used the money paid by or on behalf of the Owner.
4.9 The services, information, surveys and reports required by Owner under Sections 4.5 through 4.8 shall be furnished at the
Owner's expense, and the Design Professional shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness thereof in the
absence of any negligence on the part of the Design Professional.
4.10 The Owner shall give prompt written notice to the Design Professional if the Owner becomes aware of any fault or defect in
the Project or nonconformance with the Contract Documents.
4.11 Design Professional shall propose language for certificates or certifications to be requested of the Design Professional or
Design Professional's consultants and shall submit such to the Owner for review and approval at least fourteen (14) days prior to
execution. The Owner agrees not to request certifications that would require knowled;:)e or services beyond the scope of the
Agreement.
ARTICLE 5 CONSTRUCTION COST
5,1 CONSTRUCTION COST DEFINED
5.1.1 The Construction Cost shall be the total cost or estimated cost to the Owner of all elements of the Project designed or
specified by the Design Professional.
5.1.2 The Construction Cost shall include the cost at current market rates of labor and materials furnished by the Owner and
equipment designed, specified, selected or specially provided lor by the Design Professional, plus a reasonable allowance for the
Contractor's overhead and profrt. In addition, a reasonable allowance for contingencies shall be included for market conditions at
the time 01 bidding and for chc1noes in the work during construcliorl.
5.1.3 Construction Cost does not include the compensation of the Design Professional and Design Professional's consultants,
the costs of the land, rights-of-way, financing or other costs which are the responsibility of the Owner as provided in Article 4.
Page 17
<:.I,...,c"hIQlnc: c:p~r.\'".1nnn_ ':l.qQq\T~?4Pllhlir_ ~;;\f",tv_.c;t~tinn 7 rlnr.
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
5.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST
5.2.1 Evaluations of the Owner's Project budget, preliminary estimates of Constructi:m Cost and derailed estimates of Construc~
lion Cost prepared by the Design Professional re;:>resent the Design Professional's besi judgment as a design professional
familiar with the construction industry. it is recognized, however, thai neither the Design Professior'lal nor the Owne, has control
ave, the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the Contractor's methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive
bidding or market condiUons. Accordingly, tne Design Professional cannQ! and does not warrant or represent that bids or cost
proposals will not vary from the Owner's Project budget or from any estimate of Construction Cost or evaluation prepared or
agreed to by the Design Professional.
5.2.2 No fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be established as a condition of the Agreement by the furnishing, proposal or
establishment.of a Project budget, unless such fixed limit has been agreed upon in writing and signed by the parties thereto. if
such a fixed limit has been established, the Design Professional shall be permitted to include contingencies for design, bidding
and price escalation, to determine what materials, equipment, component systems and types of construction are to be included in
the Contract Documents, to make reasonable adjustments in the scope of the Project and to include in the Contract Documents
alternate bids to adjust the Construction Cost to the fixed limit. Fixed limits, if any, shall be increased in the amount of an
increase in the Contract Sum occurring ater execution of the Contract for Construction.
5.2.3 If the Procurement Phase has not commenced within 90 days after the Design Professional submits the Construction
Documents to the Owner, any Project budget or fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be adjusted to reflect changes in the general
level of prices in the construction industry between the date of submission of the Construction Documents to the Owner and the
date on which proposals are sought.
ARTICLE 6 OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS
6.1 The Drawings, Specifications and other documents prepared by the Design Professional for this Project are instruments of the Design
Professional's seNice and shall bec::HTle the property of the Owner upon termination or completion of the Agreement. The Design
Professional is entitled to retain copies 01 all such documents. Such documents are intended only be applicable to this Project. and
Owner's use of such documents in other projects shall be at Owner's sole risk and expense. In the event the Owner uses any of the
infomlati::m or materials developed pursuant to the Agreement in another project or for other purposes than are specified in the
.A.greemenl, the Design Professional is released from any and all liability relating to their use in that project
6.2 Submission or distribution of documents to meet official regulatory requirements or for similar purposes in connection with the Project
is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the Design Professional's reserved rights.
ARTICLE 7 TERMINATION, SUSPENSION OR ABANDONMENT
7.1 The Design Professional may terminate the Agreement upon not less than thirty days written notice should the Owner fail substan~
tially to petiorm in accordance with the terms of the Agreement through no fault of the DeSign Professional. Owner may terminate the
Agreement or any phase thereof with or without cause upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Design Professional. All work and
labor being performed under the Agreement shall cease immediately upon Design Professional's receipt of such notice. Before the end of
the thirty {3D} day period, Design Professional shall invoice t.f-Je Owner for all work it satisfactorily performed prior to the receipt of such
notice. No amount shall be due lor lost or anticipated profits. All plans, fIeld surveys, and other data related to the Proje:::t shall become
property of the Owner upon temlination of the Agreement and shall be promptly delivered to the Owner in a reasonably organized form.
Should Owner subsequently contract with a new Design Professional for continuation of services on the Project, Design Professional shall
cooperate in providing information.
7.2 If Ihe Project is suspended by the Owner for more than 30 consecutive days, the Design Professional shall be compensated for
services satisfactorily performed prior to notice of such suspension. When the Project is resumed, the Design Professional's
compensation shall be equitably adjusted to provide for expenses incurred in the interruption and resumption of the Design Professional's
services.
7.3 The Agreement may be terminaled by the Owner upon not less than seven days written notice to the Design Professional in the event
Ulat the Project is pemlanenUy abandoned. If the Project is abandoned by the Owner for more than 90 consecutive days, the Design
Professional or the Owner may terminate the Agreement by giving written notice.
7.4 Failure of the Owner to make payments to the Design Professional for work satisfacloriiy completed in accordance with the
Ag,eement shall De considered substantial nonperformance and cause for termination.
7.5 lithe Owner fails to make payment to Design Professional within thirty (30) days of receipt of c statemen1 for services properly and
;;alisfactarily performed, the Desigr, ProlessionClI may, upon seven dory'S written notice to the Owner, suspend performance of services
under the Agreement.
7.6 In the event of termination not the fault of the Design Professional, the Design Professional shall be compensated for services
properly and satisfactorily performed prior to termination.
Page 18
('.\,."....hIOlnc: c:pi=r.l,nnn",QQQ\,1?I1Pllhlir. .c:.;otfF>tv-St::1tinn 7Jlnr:
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
ARTICLE B PAYMENTS TO THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
8.1 DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE
8.1.1 Direct Personnel =-xpense is defined as the direct salaries of the Design Professional's personnel engaged on the Project
and the portion of the cost of their mandatory and customary contributions and benef1is related thereto, such as employment
laxes and other- statutory' employee benefits, insurance, sick leave, holidays, vacations, pensions anc similar contributions and
benefits.
8.2 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
8.2.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic and Additional Services and include expenses incurred
by the Design Professional and Design Professional's employees and consuliants in the interest of the Project, as identified in
the following Clauses.
8.2.1.1 Expense of transportation in connection with the Project: expenses in connection with authorized out~of-town
travel: long-distance communications: and fees paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the Pro-
ject.
8.2.1.2 Expense of reproductions (except the reproduction of the sets of documents referenced in Subsection 2.6.19),
postage and handling of Drawings, Specifications and other documents.
8.2.1.3 1f authorized in advance by the Owner, expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates.
8.2.1.4 Expense of renderings, models and mock-ups requested by the Owner.
8.2. "1.5 Expense of computer-aided design and drafting equipment time when used in connection with the Project.
8.2.1.6 Other expenses that are a;:>proved in advance in writing by the Owner.
8,3 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF BASIC SERVICES
8.3.1 Payments for Basic Services shall be made monthly and, where applicable, shall be in proportion to services periormed
within each phase of service, on the basis set forth in Section 2 of the Agreement and the schedule of work.
8.3.2 If and to the extent that the time initially established in the Agreement is exceeded or extended through no fault of the
Design Professional, compensation for any services rendered during the additional period of time shall be computed in the
manner set forth in Section 2 of the Agreement
8.3.3 When compensation is based on a percentage of Construciion Cost and any portions of the Project are deleted or
otherwise not constructed, compensation for thOSE portions of the Project shall be payable to the extent services are periormed
on those portions, in accordance with the schedule set forth in Section 2 of the Agreement based on (1) the lowest bona fide bid
or (2) if no such bid or proposal is received, the most recent preliminary estimate of Construction Cost or detailed estimate of
Construction Cost for such portions of the Project.
8.4 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES
8.4.1 Payments on account of the Design Professional's Additional Services and for Reimbursable Expenses shall be made
monthly within 30 days after the presentation to the Owner of the Design Professional's statement of services rendered or
expenses incurred.
8.5 PAYMENTS WITHHELD No deductions shall be made from the Design Professional's compensation on account of penalty,
liquidated damages or other sums withheld from payments to contractors, or on account of the cost of changes in the work other than
t\lose for which the Design Professional is responsible.
8.6 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS Design Professional shall make available to Owner or Owner's authoriz.ed
representative records of Reimbursable ::.xpenses and expenses pertaining to Additional Services and services performed on the basis of
a multiple of D'lred Personnel Expense for inspection and copying during regular business hours for three years after the date of the final
Certificate of Payment, or until any litigation relaled to the Project is final, whichever date is laler.
ARTICLE 9 INOEMNITY
9.1 The Design Professional sha11 indenmif)' ~lnd save and hold harmless the Owner and its officers, agents, and cmployct:s from and against :l.l1y
and a11 liability, claims, demands, damages, losses, and expenses, including, but not limited to court costs and reasonable 3ttorney fees incurred
by the Owner, and includmg, withoullimitation, d3111ages for bodily and personal injury, death and property damage, resulting from the neg1igent
acts or omissions of the Design Professional or its officers, shareholders, agents, or employees iTl the performance of the Agreement.
Page 19
~'\nrr.h\Rlns SP~(,;\~OOO-~9g9\3324Public Safetv-Station 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
9.2 Nothing herein shall be :::onstrued to c:-eate a liability to any person who is no! a party to the Agreement, and nothing herein
shall waive any of the parties' defenses, both at law or equity, to any claim, cause of action, or litigaiion filed by anyone no;;:; party
to the Agreement, including Ille defense of governmental immunity, which defenses are hereby expressl}' reserved
ARTICLE 10 INSURANCE During the periormance of the Services under the Agreement, Design Professional shall maintain the
following insurance will. an insurance company licensed or authorized to d::J business in the State of Texas by the Stale Insurance
Commission or any successor agency that has a rating with Besi Rate Carriers of at least an A~ or above:
10.1 Comprehensive Gene,al Liability Insurance with bodily injury limits of nolless than $1,000,000 for each occurrence and not
less than $2,000,000 in the aggregale, and with property damage limils of not less than $100,000 for each occurrence and not less
than $250,000 in the aggregate.
10.2 Automobile Liability Insurance with bodily injury limits of not less than $500,000 for each person and not less than SSOO,OOO for
each accident, and with property dama;:)8 limits Df not less than $100,000 for each accident.
10.3 Worker's Compensation Insurance in accordance with statutory requirements, and :.:mployers' Liability Insurance with limits of
not less than $100,000 for each accident including occupational disease.
10.4 Professional Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $"i ,000,000 annual aggregate.
10.5 The Design Professional shall i'Jrnish insurance certificates or insurance policies to the Owner evidencing insurance in
compliance with this Article 10 at the time of the execution of the Agreement. The General Liability and Automobile liability
insurance policies shall name the Owner as an additional insured, the Workers' Compensation policy shall contain a waiver of
subrogation in favor of the Owner, and each policy shall contain a provision that such insurance shall not be canceled or modified
without thirty (30) days' prior written notice to Owner and Design Professional. In such event, the Design Professional shall, prior 10
the effe~tivE date of the change or cancellation, furnish Owner with substitute certificates of insurance meeting the requirements of
this ,l\rticle 10.
ARTICLE 11 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
11.1 Tne Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas. Venue of any suit or cause of action under the Agreement
shall lie exclusively in Denton County, Texas.
11.2 The Owner and Design Professional, respectively, bind themselves, their partners, su:cessors, assigns and legal re~resentatives to
the other party to this Agreement and to the oartners, successors, assig:1s and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all
covenallts of this Agreement. The Design Professional shall not 2ssi9n its interests in the Agreement 1Nithout the written c::msent of the
Owner.
11.3 The term Agreement as used herein includes the executed Agreement, the Proposal, these General Conditions and other
attachments referenced in Section 3 of the Agreement which together represent the entire and integrated agreement between the Owner
and Design Professional and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. The Agreement may
be amended only by written instrument signed by both Ov.'IIer and Design Professional. \Nhen interpreting the Agreement the executed
Agreement, Proposal, these General Conditions and the oHler attachments referenced in Section 3 of the Agreement shall to the extent
thai is reasonably possible be read so as to harmonize the provisions. However, should the provisions of these documents be in conflict
so that they can not be reasonably harmonized, such documents shall be given priority in the following order:
1. The executed Agreement
2. Attachments referenced in Section 3 of the Agreement other than the Proposal
3. These General Provisions
4. The Proposal
11.4 Nothing contained in the Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against
either the Owner or Design Professional.
11.5 Upon receipt of prior written approval of Owner, the Design Professional shall have the right to include representations of the design
of the Project, including photographs of the exterior and interior, among the Design Professional's promotional and professional materials.
The Design Professional's materials shall nol include the Owner's confidential or proprietal)' information if the Owner I13S previously
advised the Design Professional in writing of the specifiC information considered by the Owner to be confidential or proprietary. The
Owner sllall provide professional credit for the Design Professional on the constrJction sign and in the promotional materials for the
Project.
"11.6 ,u.pproval by the Owner shall not constitute, nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability oi the Design
Professional, its employees, associates, agents, subcontractors, and subconsultants for the accuracy and competency of their
Page 20
S'\nrr.h\RlnS SPEC\3000-3999\3324Public Safety-Station 7.doc
REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL 3324
City of Denton
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
Fire Station #7
designs or other work; nor shall such approval be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the Owner for any defect in
the design or other work prepared by the Design Professional, its employees, subcont,aclO~S, agents, and consultants.
11.7 All notices, communications, and reports required or permitted under the Agreement shall be personally delivered or mailed to
the respective parties by depositing same in the United Stales mail to the address shown below signature block on the Agreement,
certified mail, return receipt requesied, unless otherwise specified herein. All notices shall be deemed effective upon receipt by the
party to v,rhom such notice is given, or within three (3) days after mailing.
11.8 If any provision of the Agreement is found or deemed by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, it
sr,all be considered severable from the remainder of the Agreement and shall not cause the remainder to be invalid or
unenforceable. In such event, the parties shall reform the Agreement to replace such stricken provision with a valid and enforceable
provision which comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision.
11.9 The Design Professional shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances applicable io
the work covered hereunder as they may now read or hereinafter be amended during the term of this Agreement.
11.10 In performing the Services required hereunder, the Design Professional shall not discriminate against any person on the
basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, ag8, or physical handicap.
11.11 Tne ca;:Jtions of the Agreement are for informational purposes only, and shall not in any way affect the substantive terms or
conditions of the Agreement.
Page 21
S:\orch\BIDS SPEC\300Q-3999\3324Public Safety-Station 7.doc
"".~ ~,! / '
~i~ij,J
""~'\c"~
;~'~;".'~;':'~-;:.~,.J'"
,\.;(;~.\ >. . ,-.{~~)~
'~./ tJ I.: ~'J \..~. '?N.
~~~~M.b:l,,~~;/."/
:-;,;:,~,..,.- .,.
~~NT04' I
A.
"~illllli'JiY
t~~I'~~
({it,': ~ f
1:J1lf: DE~"\.
Exhibit B
City of
Denton
I~;;';;'o:.'t~..,_.,.s
~>
11
~ ;,,,..;;.ii~{'"~
":~~i
~~~ -,.'---~.
~
,..'.
,~r ~i:t~i'
~ ~'~;:%~ij
:~i
"\~~l~
:~..:.~
'j~
',~:~~~,
:,.;j
-<>:';;l"
j
~:"":'';:'
"*
,,"'
,
',~e.-~."....>-
Af,.-:~.,,!
it!
." '<;"<
'\~
e',~~
"
j
'l~n ~~
~~~
,
1;,
.~
~t~
- ,
-Q)pffil,
o.;..E..li
~~;,:,~
0),# "",
Z\,,#
. t~1<
'-""'\l:;"'jl>
Q)~~
O;;.:';t'~J
O,?l'!!".J.{,'
O.
, ..."""""'"
........, "" ~i4
.~
t~",
ro ,,>it'
':>''''''
~",~lk,~
Q) -,~
....--
en
N'-~'-
~~~~
~NU1lfl
J,g~.~.
~~g,~.
.;o~.L:>!
Ul :5 0. u...
'0
'0
E
,
~
ill
~
t
,
.. !
,
.. ~-;
ex:
ex:
o
.0
E
:J
...
(j)
0:
l/)
Q)~
Es
"'~
.., 0.
.
,
C"
~~~'"
<tro~""
,MO
TI illO
8~ * \2
~.rt!~~
coo
w3r-t-
01"""
. ~..
t:-l9Q...1.J...
,~ 'T:r
N
co
0,
;::
co
o
o
co
E
o
u
liE
g~
.~ t/l
":::"0
" .
ro."::::
5-e
illro
@c
au
Dill,
E'
~J
\U\l
w Cl ~ Cl
~ z
~ z 0 5
~ Z ii'
~ z =>
u :5 w m
w ~ z
~ ~ " 0
'i' 0
u
0
.
.,.;!!'
~.:::<~
!J\~~
~i<$z'''''0''4d:f:t. .
,," ~ ;.~,",".:,,''''.;...~~-',~",',/
-ifr"-~~ .--?
'I>; ,j' ..... X
.:... "'Ii"~- ~.::;i1k ."
'.0 _~51'.t;.:~~."'iitI.<;
,;~1";7~ ~+;
~i~~
"
-~~h
~:'~
;.ti[~
.~
'~~~
i!"""'-:t
..j,
,
~-
i
-
""-'-
~-
<',;Zlf'lti'
~
~"'i.1-. $'
jP'~~lr~ ._~!fAt
.;>~;W~~'\t;
:r.r~~";~li!:';-
rP' '9-'~~fq, J - ~y,;" ':'!;j.;';
~ ~ ~.. ~
\,_n.........&. W,. y~; a"
Response to:
RFSP #3324
,;.
?~~
,,-'-'&'~E,
._t!....,.~
).
. .~,
'," "'-.
,
for
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
and Fire Station #7 Design
J,
Submitted:
April 12, 2005
.,
-~~
.-,_';.']1
.~
" ~~
K
A
s
12 April 2005
City of Denton
Purchasing Department
Attention: Tom Shaw, Purchasing Agent
901-B Texas Street
Denton, Texas 76209
Re: RFSP #3324 Architectural Services for Public Safety
Training Facility Master Plan and Fire Station #7 Design
Dear Mr. Shaw:
It is with great enthusiasm that we submit our proposal to provide services for the Denton Public Safety
Training Facility Master Plan and Fire Station #7. This project holds great importance to the City of Denton's
public safety and to the professionals that serve our community. Understanding its significance, we have
assembled an outstanding team of architectural, engineering and emergency training professionals
experienced in fire station design and comprehensive public safety training facilities.
Our team provides the City of Denton significant advantages, including:
. Preeminent design experience in master planning of public safety training facilities
. Extensive design experience in fire stations
. Experience in the design of tactical training facilities
. Successful record of educational facility design
. Expertise in educational programming and operation of tactical training facilities
. Established rapport between the KAS Team and the City of Denton
These advantages, combined with our passion and your collaboration, will make a superior project to serve
the needs of the growing community. Having worked successfully with both the Police and Fire
Departments, as well as with City Staff, we look forward to the opportunity to continue the professional
relationship with the City of Denton.
Best regards,
100 West Mulberry
Denton,Texas
7 6 201
940/387.8182Iel
940/383.0262fax
www.k-Q-studio.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ONE.
PROJECT TEAM
TEAM MEMBERS AND THEIR ROLE IN THE PROJECT
PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION CtiART
TWO.
ARCHITECTS AND DESIGN CONSULTANTS
KIRKPATRICK ARCHITECTURE STUDIO- DESIGN ARCHITECTS
STEWART COOPER NEWELL - CONSULTING ARCHITECTS
TOMMY A. ABERCROMBIE - EMERGENCY SERVICE TRAINING FACILITY DESIGN CONSULTANT
TH REE.
PROJECT APPROACH
WORKING WJTH CITY DEPARTMENTS
WORKING WITH CITY STAFF
WORKING WITH COMMUNITY GROUPS
SUSTAINABILlTY
FOUR.
CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERING
ISBELL ENGINEERING GROUP - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
DALE W. CAFFEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS - MEP ENGINEERING
SPINNAKER TECHNOLOGY GROUP - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
CES - COST ESTIMATING CONSULTANT
KIRKPATRICK
ARCHITECTURE
STUDIO
For the City of Denton's Public Safety Training Facility
Moster Plan and Fire Station #7 Design, Kirkpatrick
Architecture Studio is presenting the award-winning design
team that was so successful in completing the
Denton Central Fire Station in 2003 (less the historic
preservation consultants). We hove enhanced the team
with the addition of on Emergency Service Training Facility
Consultant, Tommy Abercrombie, to meet the specifiC needs
of this project.
KIRKPATRICK
ARCHITECTURE
STUDIO
TEAM MEMBERS AND THEIR ROLES
JAMES R. KIRKPATRICK
KIRKP A TRICK ARCHITECTURE STUDIO
940.387,8182 tel
jim@k-a-studio.com
SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT
KIRKPATRICK ARCHITECTURE STUDIO
DESIGN ARCHITECTS
MASTER PLANNING
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
STEWART COOPER NEWELL
CONSULTING ARCHITECTS
MASTER PLANNING
TOMMY A. ABERCROMBIE
EMERGENCY SERVICES
TRAINING FACILITY DESIGN CONSULTANT
MASTER PLANNING
KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERING
MASTER PLANNING
ISBELL ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
DALE W. CAFFEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
MEP ENGINEERING
SPINNAKER TECHNOLOGY GROUP
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
COMPUTERIZED ESTIMATION SERVICES ICES)
COST ESTIMATING
KIRKPATRICK
ARCHITECTURE
STUDIO
",",. . '",,' ..' "
StEiwartCooper Newell ,',
. ..,., ~.,s:onsuitj,;g' ,Ak~iteds
.','. .~' -'" .'>'-;-.: ~';/';
.. " . .' ...: ,. ".-,," .~'~-.''''
KIRKPATR
. "CITY.OF DENTON,
'''-' ----,,',.'.
',_'..c.
.. :', ,;.,.. -;, . -~-,"': . . ;
Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan ancJ Fire
'Station #7Project:
KIr~~9i;ic;KArc:hite(;t~r~s.iudib '
" 'DesignAicnite,i:t, .
JamesR. KirkpatrickJ\IA
"Sif19IePoint:6iC::8m~ai:;t ,.",.'.
I'
~,
'\
/
... IsbeIlErigine~ringGrO~p~ .
,..' ..~:. ::':':':~SjrG2iGri:Wc:/~c<"
, . '.' ~~E0~1~~~ri?~,~~g:y:.I.:.~.~t ~ ~= .
.Da~e 0P~~:Y,~ttt~!!n~. 5.f1}~~:!iers
. . ErgineeringCohsuliOnt '.
;..,;_:~;::::~~:.. '~. c,':/:.' ',' ;;-_::. ;:;,":0>' _~;:';-';;'''':-:'~ '
....,,;,;': .", ".; ,.'.' "'-;"":';";'.":;\,'.;,', <~'..::';';")L':'"
" ^ _:.:,,-'
Spinnal<:er.T~chnology;' G.roup.
'. 'TechnalogY,'Con5~ltarit ".
. ~'--":'cO',~, t... - -. . ..-....-
-,-,".-
.',---_..,,;-,.,;,.,<.
" :..",:.:.,.,'....
Thomas A. Abercro;"bi~ '
";,~.::[)esi9r:1;<;:Q'~sultaht'" ,';
... ," . . '.' ..::': ".- ~t''''~,'-'- ..,.
. -~:--7-"'.~~~:;" ;;- ;;,-..., . .--,
C K
ARCHITECTURE
S T U D
o
Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio
Design Architect
Firm Profile
Resumes:
Jomes R. Kirkpatrick, AlA
Michael D. Howard
David M. Robinson
Related Projects:
Master Planning Experience
Denton Central Fire Station
Denton Police Station Interior Renovation
Denton Jail Renovation
City of Denton Service Center
DISD Administration Building
Universidad de Celaya - Master Planning, Classroom Building
University of North Texas Projects
Texas Woman's University Projects
J FIRM PROFILE
'I
)
)
)
K
RKPATR
KAS is a full service architecture, planning, and interior design firm which has a
long-standing reputation for quality design and leadership. A respected
anchor in the professional community, it has contributed to the design of
numerous landmark structures, locally, regionally, and internationally.
As a firm, we excel in the practice of orchitecture and are fully
commitfed fo provide exceptional service to our clients and maintain
growing professional relationships with them. It is our goal to meet the
needs of our clients by creating 0 functional, cost-effective, aesthetically
pleasing design.
C~i;fIGe. j
G !!()!~
Firm Name:
Type of Firm:
Founded:
Address:
Kirkpatrick Archtecture Studio
Professional Corporation
1978
100 West Mulberry Street
Denton, Texas 76201
(940) 387-8182
(940) 383-0262
info@k-a-sfudio.com
James R. Kirkpatrick
www.k-a-studio.com
Telephone:
Fax:
E-mail:
Confact:
Websife:
"
:,'1:: ces
. Architectural Design
Master Planning
Long Range Development Planning
Facilities Program Development
Space Planning
Interior Design
Construction Administration
Graphic Design
!;;; C ~. ::'':::'~ ;~i t\ i"i" ~
~~ (} rtVi (."\ ~ i:?o
Architects 1
Architectural Interns 3
Project Manager 3
Graphic Design 1
Office Administration 2
DataCAD 11
. Adobe Phatoshop CS
. Adobe Illustrator CS
Adobe InDesign CS
. Adobe GoLive CS
C K
ARC H
o
TECTURE
S T U D
PERSONNEL
'I
K
RKPATR
C K
James R. Kirkpatrick, AlA Lead Architect/CEO
Jim has more than 25 years experience as an Architect. as well as a busi-
ness awner. He will oversee the project in every phase trom beginning
to completion. and in being supported by exceptional technical staff is
capable of meeting mutually established schedules and deadlines.
Michael D. Howard
Praject Manager - Field Operations
Michael has 25 years experience in architecture and construction. He
has led construction administration and construction management for
our firm for more than 15 years.
David M. Robinson
Project Manager - Production
With nearly ten years of experience, David has returned to Kirkpatrick
Architecture Studio to lead the KAS production team from the sche-
matic design through construction and completion.
Thomas R. Wood
Project Manager - Quality Control
Thomas (Ty) has recently joined the KAS team to ensure consistency and
quality in the construction documents. He joins KAS with over five years
experience in construction and architecture.
Jose Gonzalez
Architectural Intern
Jose joined Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio in 1996. Since then he has
been instrumental in the production of contruction documents and the
timely completion of projects.
Evelyn Lopez Corum
Architectural Intern
Evelyn is a recent graduate of the University of Houston. and has been
with KAS nearly two years. As a CAD Technician and Architectural
Intern. Evelyn will be assisting in the Programming. Schematic Design.
Construction Documents Production and Construction Administration.
Timothy Carl Deaton
Architectural Intern
Since Tim joined KAS in May of 2004 he has assisted in the completion of
Construction Documents. He also assists the marketing department by
constructing models for presentation.
ARC H
TECTURE
S T U D
o
Registrations
TX No. 5491
AR No. 1371
NM No. 1203
OK No. 1729
Jam e s R. K irk pat r i c k. A I A
lead Architect/CEO
Jim has more than 30 years experience as a Licensed Architect, as well as 0
business owner. He will oversee the project in every phase from beginning to
completion, and in being supported by exceptional technical stoff is capable
of meeting mutually established schedules and deadlines.
Education
Texas A&M University
Bachelor of Architecture
Master of Architecture
ProFessional Associations
American Institute of Architects (AlA)
National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB)
Texas Society of Architects (TSA)
Fort Worth Chapter AlA
AlA Continental Europe
Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
Professional References
Mr. Jerry Dickson
Su perintendent -Retired
Whitesboro I.S.D.
3907 Roland Rd.
Whitesboro, TX 76273
(903) 564-6317
Mr. Charles Fenoglio
President
Sanger Bank
501 N. Stem mons Freeway
Songer, TX 76266
(940) 458-4602
Mary Helen Martin
Principal
Ginnings Elementary School
2525 North Yellowstone Place
Denton, Texas 76201
(940) 369-2700
Mr. Kent Miller
Trinity Presbyterian Church
2200 Bell Avenue
Denton, Texas 76201
(940) 324-8815
Mr. Robert Sherman
Cumberland Presbyterian
Children's Home / Sherman Building
101 North Elm
Denton, TX 76201
[940) 484-8778
Mr. Glen Martin
Denton I.S.o.
230 North Mayhill Road
Denton, TX 76208
(940) 390-0893
Larry Reynolds
Southmont Baptist Church
2801 Pennsylvania
Denton, Texas 76201
(940) 566-3313
III
M i c h a e I D. How a r d
Project Manager - Field Operations
Michael has 25 years experience in architecture and construction. He has led
construction odministration and construction management tor our firm for
more than fifteen years.
Education
University ofTexas at Arlington
Bachelors in Architecture
Professional Experience
Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio 1991-Present
Denton, Texas
Project Manager
Pearl Incorporated 1990
Dept. of Real Estate and Construction
Dallas, Texas
Manager of Architectural Services
James R. Kirkpatrick, Architect 1986-1989
Denton, Texas
Project Manager
Robert E. Horn Associates, Architects 1981-1986
Denton, Texas
Architect Intern
Pierce General Contractors 1978-1981
Denton, Texas
Project Manager
Project Experience
University of North Texas - Additions & Renovations
Physics Building
General Academics Building
Biology Building
Engineering Tech Building
Matthews Hall
Chemistry Building
Business Administration Building
Universidad de Celaya - Cafeteria & Dining Facility; Guanajuato, Mexico
McNair Elementary; Denton, Texas .
Hodge Elementary; Denton, Texas
Borman Elementary; Denton, Texas
First State Bank of Texas - Main Branch, North Denton Branch, UNT Branch,
Kaufman Branch, The Colony Branch
Cumberland Presbyterian Children's Home - Campus Plan & Additions/Reno-
vations; Denton, Texas
Argyle High School - Additions and Renovations; Argyle, Texas
Hilltop Elementary School; Argyle, Texas '
Calhoun Middle School- Fine Arts Addition; Denton, Texas
II
D a v i d M. Rob ins 0 n, LEED AP
Project Manager - Production
With nearly ten years of experience, David has returned to, Kirkpatrick
Architecture Studio to lead the KAS production team from the schematic design
through construction and completion.
Education
Texas A&M University
Masters of Architecture
Southwestern University
Bachelar of Arts in Political Science
Professional Experience
Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio
Denton, Texas
Project Manager
October 2004 - Present
Gensler
Dallas, Texas
Associate
2001- 2004
3C.i
Dallas, Texas
Associate
1997-2001
James R. Kirkpatrick, Architect
Denton, Texas
Architectural Intern
1993-1994
Project Experience
Bank One Operations Center
Schlumberger, Conveyance and Delivery Center; Sugar Land, Texas
UNT Classroom Ronovations; Denton, Texas
401 Carlson Parkwoy; Minnetonka, Minnesoto
401 Carlson Garage; Minnetonka, Minnesota
A. Nieto Residence; Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico
Carlson Center Conservatory; Minnetonka, Minnesota
Carlson Center Link; Minnetonka, Minnesota
Dallas Cowboys Golf Club Pavilion; Grapevine, Texas
Dallas Cowboys Golf Club; Grapevine, Texas
EDS, Shepherd Mall; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
First State Bank Renovation; Denton, Texas
First State Bank; Colony, Texas
Fossil Creek Tech Center
Granite Plaza Office Building; Irving, Texas
James R. Kirkpatrick, Architect Offices; Denton, Texas
JC Penney Store #1943 Renovation; Hurst, Texas
Lincoln Center Restroom Renovations
One Telecom Office Building; Richardson, Texas
R. Nieto Residence; Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico
Rapp Collins World Headquarters; Irving, Texas
Scalamandre Showroom; Dallas, Texas
Sherman Building; Denton, Texas
Tangle Ridge Golf Clubhouse Renovation Plan; Grand Prarie Texas
Vandergriff Toyota Automobile Dealership; Dallas, Texas
Whitesboro Middle School; Whitesboro, Texas
II
Master Planning
Southmont Baptist Church
Long-Range Development Plan
Design Phase 1: Fellowship Hall
Design Phase 2: Sanctuary and Education Space
Awarded AlA Ft. Worth Design & Construction Award 1981
Client Contact:
Larry Reynolds, Pastor
940/566.3313
Cumberland Presbyterian Children's Home
Long-Range Facilities Development and Master Plan for existing Presbyterian Children's Home
Client Contact:
Robert Sherman
940-368-6915
Argyle Independent School District
2004 Program ($28 million) Included:
New Elementary Facility
Additions + Renovations to Existing High School
Multi-Sport Facility
Support Services Facility
2005 Program (approx, $30 million)
Client Contact:
Carolyn Pierei, Superintendent
940/464.7241
\
J
Denton Independent School District
Program Included:
Additions + Renovations to existing Elementary,
Middle & Senior High Schools
New Elementary School Facilities
New District Administration Facility
Client Contact:
Norm Sisk, Executive Director of Operations
940/369.0220
Whitesboro Independent School District
Progrom Included:
New Middle School Facility
Client Contoct:
Jerry Dickson, Superintendent (Retired)
940/564.6317
Valley View Independent School District
Program Included:
New Multi-Function Facility (Gymnasium/Library/Cafeteria)
Additions + Renovations to Vocational Building
Additions to Valley View High School
KIRKPATRICK
ARCHITECTURE
S T U D
o
K
RKPATR
C~(ARCH
TECTURESTUD
o
\
'I
)
)
) Denton Central Fire Station
) Denton, Texas
nature of service:
Architect ot Record
nature of flrmls control:
Prime Professional
size:
27,000 sq.ft.
project description:
Completed in April 2003, this project was an adaptive re-use of a
1940s diesel-generated power plant for use as Denton's Central
Fire Station. Many of the buildings' original aesthetics were
retained while giving it 0 more contemporary feel.
awards:
AlA Fort Worth Design Award 2004
Preservotion Texas, Best Adaptive Re-use of Historic Structure 2004
Main Street Denton, Excellence in Preservation 2003
Texas Downtown Association, Best ,I,daptive Re-use 2003
Firechiet Magozine, Best Adoptive Re-use Silver Medal 2003
client contact:
Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief
940/349,8840
II
I~
R~~PATR
C K ARC H
TECTURESTUD
o
)
Denton Police Station
Denton. Texas
City of Denton
nature of service:
Interior Renovation
building area:
950 sq,ft,
dote of completion:
May 2004
project description:
The primary reason for the renovations to the interior space of the Police Station on Hickory Street was 0 need
tor on authoritative lobby space which promoted the security of the facility, In addition to the security issues
the lobby areo needed on ease of fiow to increase its functionality and usability. Clearly seperate waiting and
control areas were established along with new security features and updated finishes,
client contact:
Charles Wiley, Chief of Police
940/349.7925
II
K
RKPATR
C K ARC H
TECTURESTUD
o
Hl[ II c:I~lc i: i Ii
E:~u iYA)'ROOkJ f-'1~."_:_~- -----, pAML ::,I~~ __l~-"'-~-!~'~~~-,- -l' ,_ - __ : __l~:-~~_
-/,3_::0:}2~~():Y_11-~' ~
, , " r-----------\,'",'
i "-'1 j! I~I'-r';-C' I " i'
z I --i-,.- , i j : I I I I I I~! I
--J(T~o;;:t~~'9-- :f'C{lll: ~'-rlti"l' ,1+%U r-':::7_1~__~~~c=t
I ,-'- : I ;:01' :,1 I' I ti':'ill.~ ,. I I
-Q, .-1 - -G-- - - ~ _I, -~ :.g;,'~;,- '-'- ',,1_0- I -.i _ \,QLJ~I- -., I _.
I 'I F"'" - I II I,,;: I jll};"'! .;.; I, j-I';':'--';r''-:~ :~.-- '-
- '//..."1 I ""-1 ~ ~ '';''11 ut.,~ 1: iLl: I )'_'J .: I; ~ i'
~ ;,; ~I[:' ',- \ ~.-:)~c,; ~ 11'1',.r. <;'! I~' 'II
'" I 'y~---'- - .:: i i./::::l -- , ~ C'.
~. ~.i@i q_.II:j'" ,,)/'fj',,, ~i "''''---1['''' J '!II
- ! I I " ,I ~ . i,': !:i),:n BOpKING: ..., ~I'I mTl', ~ i'l [ITj il
~~----'--i= ~ I '"----~-_..' I liNT' RR
" i ! ~ (i0~~1: ", <<) i t:-E~_~_ ~'.___._, ~L! =--:4!' ~"', r< I ~ 'j -
i I ! 121$' "'~-.~L I --_._-~._._._.--" PH":',:;=-:
9 I @aJ ~~ JHflr I
"! I :ELL ~, :~ ':;;': I ';< l ( ~1, C"-, ,\ ."
! 5'i ,,'";i-,..- n... :--0'. I i~ . ,J I )
I it' ;.:; i (i~4~:' i1: I I 1" ..~'::' '. ([',./11
I r --, ii! L~.. i~-'-'>'j
~ 2:J . Ii: . c.;:J~Dc)
I I L ill illO.. !,- illJ
i 1 iii ..SEP__::-~~~~ lL.. SEP_
- - --+-~- ~ -r-- . ,.---=:
P"AS~ I /j--'-'-J,~c~~;~G~~1'-'~;~T~.:'L1GNi:
" 'REST,
i
,
'~
II
I'
,I
'I
I.
I!~
II 1112:
I~
CELL i LSEP:
[<,,'1:111'1
t..;~Ilh-_'
~jcJL ' ~
CELL .11
r;---~
I
<u !?[1,@]@l~ ~[1,~m
5CAL~: 112" " r~o"
~
Denton Jail Renovation
Denton, Texas
City ot Denton
nature of service:
Architect of Record
renovation area:
5,476 sq. ft.
project description:
The Denton Jail Project is a Renovation of and an Addition to the existing facility. The design includes the
added cells for increased capacity. The other goal of the client is to elevate the level of security in a few
problem areas, Windows will be added in guard areas to increase visibility. New architectural materials will be
introduced in key areas of the facility that will be more durable and resistant to inmate wear. Enhancements
will also be made to the Interrogation/Arraignment Room.
client contact:
Dean Hartley, Facilities Manager
940/349.7200
III
'I
K
RKPATR
C K ARC H
\
,
Denton Service Center
Denton, Texas
nature of service:
Architect of Record
nature of firm's control:
Prime Professional
size:
45,000 sq.ft.
project description:
A new Service Facility for the City of Denton
client contact:
Bruce Hennington
940/349-7200
TECTURESTUD
o
I~
RKPATR
C K ARC H
TECTURESTUD
o
)
nature of service:
Architect of Record
nature of firm's control:
Prime Professional
Denton Independent School District
Administration Building
Denton, Texas
size:
20,270 sq.ft.
project description:
The Administration Building for Denton ISO was essentially a
new facility, It provided a new Board Room/llssembly Area
with seating for 75- 100 as well as sufficient office space for
the growing district. One wing of the building encorporated
on Adaptive/Re-Use of on existing classroom facility.
client contact:
Glen Martin
940/390,0893
I~
RI~PATR
CKARCH
TECTURESTUD
o
Universidad de Celaya
Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico
nature of ser/ice:
Architect of Record
naturs of firm's control:
Prime Professional
project description:
This project included the University Master Plan and Site
Development along with the design and construction of four new
built spaces for the Universidad de Celaya in Mexico. The four
buildings included a theatre, a computer/technology center, a
student center and cafeteria, and a classroom building,
client contact:
Sr, Mauricio Clark. Secretario, Universidad de Celaya
011-52-461-20861
"When I hired Jim Kirkpatrick in 1988 to lead the planning. design
and construction of the Universidad de Celaya, he exhibited
extroordinary leadership skills through his coordination of locat
engineers, building professionals and artisans...
As Presidente Municipal de 10 Ciudad de Celaya, Acting
Gobernador de el Estado de Guanajuato, and Diputado Federal
por el Estado de Guanajuato, 1 hove hod the opportunity to observe
leadership capabilities that generote lasting results...
The existence and success of the Universiclad de Celaya ore a
direct result of Jim's vision, leadership, and architectuml talent."
-Sr, Mauricio Clark,
II
)
)
I~
RKPATR
C K ARC H
TECTURESTUD
o
University of North Texas Projects
Denton, Texas
. Shrader Pavilion
. New Parking Lots
. Fouts Field Press Boxes
. Fouts Field Training Room
. University Services Building
. Women's Gym Renovation
. Physics Building Renovation
. Biology Building Renovation
. Biology Building Modification
. Chemistry Building Renovation
. Particle Accelerator Laboratory
Owner Contoct:
Julius Zsohar, Construction Directar
940/565.2751
I
. Health Services Building Remodel
. Library Annex Warehouse Phose III
. New Grounds Maintenance Building
. Kerr Hall Expansion and Modifications
. Renovation of Six Large Lecture Rooms
. Matthews Hall Remodel and Renovation
. Business Administration Building Remodel
. Clark Dining Hall Renovation and Remodel
. Engineering Technology Building Renovation
. Kerr Hall Expansion and Modifications Phose II
a Advancement Center Addition and Renovation
K
RKPATR
, -~., -~-".
C K ARC H
Texas Woman's University Projects
Denton, T exos
. Pannell Hall-Remodel
. Restoration of Old Main
. Golf Course Club House
. Student Center-Addition
. Texas Street Parking Area
. Wellness Center-Remodel
. Wellness Center-New Facilities
. Oakland Avenue Parking Area
. Student Life Deportment-Offices
. Hubbard Hall-Barrier Free Entrance
. Administration Building-Renovation
Owner Contact:
Mary Evelyn Huey
Former President, TWU
940/382.9458
TECTURESTUD
o
. Public Information Ofoce-Remodel
. Morga Jones Auditorium-Renovation
. University Site Entrance Development
. H.P,E.R.D. Building-Renovation Phase 1
= H.P.E.R.D, Building-Renovation Phase 2
. Arts and Sciences Building-Renovation
. Library Parking and Area Development
. Student Center Garden Room-Remodel
. H.P.E.R.D. Building-Window Replacement
. Institutional Advancement Office-Remodel
. Southwest Institute of Design Building-Renovation
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
Consulting Architects
Firm Description
Resumes:
Ken Newell, AlA
Phillip Welch
Jomes Stumbo
Related Projects:
Public Safetv Trainina Focilities
Gaston College Regional Emergency Services Training Facility
. Classroom/Administration Building for Fire, EMS, & Criminal Justice Academy
. Physical Training & Shower/Locker Rooms
. Residential Burn Building
. 5-story Fire Tower - 20,459sf - the largest in the United States
. Confined Space Rescue
. Burn Pits
. Driving Track
. "Dirty" Training Props
Guilford Technical Community College
. Master Plan
. 4-story Burn Building
. 4-story + roof Fire Tower
Sandhills Community College
. Master Plan to include
Commercial + Residential Burn Buildings,Training/Drill Tower, Fire Pits,
Pumper Test/Drafting Pits, Vehicle Extraction
City of Greenville, NC
. Master Plan on a Challenging Site
City of Fayetteville/Fayetteville State University
. Fire Station and Training Facility
Fire Station Facilities
Clarendon County Public Safety Facility
Gastonia Fire Department Headquarters Station
York Fire Department Headquarters Station
Old Richmond Fire Headquarters Station
Hilton Head Prototype Fire Station
Kernersville Prototype Fire Substation
Thomasville Prototype Fire Substation
Virginia Beach Coastal Substation
Firm Description
STEWART COOPER NEWELL ARCHITECTS has been providing its clients with quality
architectural design services for the past 34 years. As a firm, our goal is to provide
excellence in planning, design, and construction administration; while keeping in mind our
client's budget and schedule. Since the formation of the firm in 1971, we have enjoyed
steady growth in all our studios and had the opportunity to work with many different project
types and industries.
Today, our multi-disciplined staff specializes in several areas, most notably Public Safety
Facilities, including Fire/Rescue/EMS Stations, Fire Training Facilities, Law Enforcement,
and Correctional Facilities. We also provide design services for Municipal clients, Higher
Education clients, Church clients, Recreation clients, and Commercial clients. In
addition to our architectural expertise, we also offer our clients Interior Design, Master
Planning, Space Needs Studies, Long Range Planning, Feasibility Studies, and Pre-Design
Planning.
)
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects understands the science of designing Fire/EMS ND
Police Stations. Over the past 30 years we have designed over 100 Fire/EMS Stations,
Fire Training Facilities, and Law Enforcement Facilities across North and South Caro-
lina, and the United States. Our specialized expertise has helped many cities and
counties better the moral of their firefighters, decrease insurance rates, and provide'
better protection for their citizens. We are active members of several national
firemen's Associations, which helps us stay abreast of all the regulations and other
changes that effect the fire service and design of these critical facilities.
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects has provided architectural and consulting services for
fire departments and municipalities in North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, Kentucky,
Virginia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Nebraska, and New Jersey.
Several of these designs have won Station Style Design Awards from Fire Chief Magazine.
We serve our clients from two offices: our headquarters in Gastonia, North Carolina and an
office in Columbia, South Carolina.
OFFICE LOCATIONS
Stewart. Cooper. NeweU . Architects, P.A. Stewart. Cooper. Newell. Architects, P.A.
7t9 E. Second Avenue, Gaston;., NC 28054 2016 Sumter SI. Stc 202 Columbia, SC 29201
Phone: 704.865.6311 Fax: 704.865.0046 Phoue: 803.765.9011 Fax: 803.765.2011
W1\'W .scn-architects.com
www.fire-facilities.com
Stewart Cooper N Gwell Architects
I!Si
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
Ken Newell, AlA, Emergency Services Training Facility Designer
Ken Newell, AlA, is a senior
principal with Stewart Cooper
Newell Architects, and has
designed over 100 Fire/EMS
stations and fire training
facilities since joining the firm
in 1988.
He has provided architectural
and consulting services for
fire departments and munici-
palities in North Carolina,
South Carolina, Texas,
Kentucky, Virginia, Michigan,
Wisconsin, Georgia, Ne-
braska, and New Jersey.
Ken has also spoken at
various national and state fire
conferences.
Ken also maintains a general
contractors license as a
means of staying more
closely in touch with the
construction community
EDUCATION:
University Of North Carolina At Charlotte
College Of Architecture
Charlotte, North Carolina
Bachelor Of Art In Architecture
North Carolina State University
SchoolOfDesigo
Raleigh, North Carolina
Bachelor Of Architecture
REGISTRATION:
Virginia
North Carolina
South Carolina
Florida
Georgia
NCARB
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES AND INVOLVEMENT:
American Institute of Architects
North Carolina Fireman's Association
South Carolina Fireman's Association
International Association of Fire Chiefs
PRESENTATiONS andARJ"JCLES:
Ken has written articles 00 Fire Station Design that have been
published in Carolina Fire & Rescue Journal and Fire Chief Magazine
Ken has deliver presentations on Fire Station Design and Training
Facility Design at the following conferences:
- South Carolina Fire Chief'" Conference
- FIERO, National Fire Station De"ign Sympo"ium
- NC Firefighter'" Conference
RECENT PROJECTS:
Ken has served as Principal in Charge or Consultant on the following projects:
Gaston College RESTC: 20,000 SF Burn Building, Residential
Burn Building, Drafting Pits, Burn Pits, classrooms, etc.
Guilford Technical College Emergency Training Center
Sand Hills Community College Fire Training Facility
New Hanover County/Cape Fear Community Emergency Services
Training Facility Master Plan and Design
City ofGreeoville, NC Emergency Services Training Facility
Ken Newell, AlA, NCARB Resume
~
stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
Phillip WeIch
Emergency Services Training Facility Program Specialist
Pbil is tbe Director of the Gaston
College Regional Emergency
Services Training Center
(RESTC), oversceing 130 Fire-
Rescue instructors, and approxi-
mately 4000 firefighters and fire
brigade responders each year.
The 22 Acre RESTC is one of
the busicst centers in the United
States, and includes a 21,000 SF
Commercial Burn Building - the
largest in the nation.
Phil's experience has resulted in
research and reports covering:
. Firefighter Heart Attacks,
Line of Duty Deaths
. Promotional Assessment
Centers
. Municipal Fire Depart-
ment Master Planning
,I
Phil has 24 years of fire service
experience. His daily duties
include the complete manage-
ment of the staff, operations,
maintenance, planning, develop-
ment and equipment acquisitions
for the facility. He is experi-
enced in most all types of emer-
gency training props and simula-
tions, whether they are fueled by
class A combustibles, com-
pressed gas, combustible /
flammable liquids or constructed
, with ordinary materials, con-
crete, or steel. He is also
knowledgeable in environmental
compliancc systems such as oil /
water separation systems.
Phillip B. Welch Jr., Resume
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
EDUCATION:
1986 Fire Science Degree
Gaston College, Dallas, NC
] 999 Business Administration Degree
Gastoo College, Dallas, NC
Current Fire & Safety Engineering Technology
University of Cincinnati
2004 Executive Fire Officer
National Fire Academy
FrRE SERVICE CAREER POS1T10NS:
I 990-Present Gastnn College, Dallas, North Carolina
Director-Regional Emergency Services Training
Centerl Fire & Rescue Training, Fire Protection Technolob')'
Gaston College, Dallas, North Carolina
Instructor - Fire Service Programs
Gastonia Fire Department
Enginecr/FirefighterlHazardous Materials Team
Union Road Volunteer Fire Department, Gastonia, NC
Fire Chief - Union Road Volunteer Fire Department
1989-Present
1981-1990
1 980-Present
1989-1997
COMMITTEE APPOlNTMENTS
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) - Technical Committee Chairman
on Fire Service Training
NationalFire Protection Association (NFPA) - Task Group Chair for NFPA
1402 - Building Fire Service Training Centers
N.C. State Firemen's Association - HALO Co=ittee Chair
N.C. Co=unity College System - Fire Protection Technology Writing
N.C. Fire/Rescue Commission - Fire Control Validation Co=ittee
N.C. Region II Fire Trilluing Advisory Committee
N.C. Society of Fire Service Instructors - Planning Committee
Gaston County, NC Local Emergency Planning Committee
Gaston County American Red Cross - Local Disaster Planning Committee
ORGANIZATION MEMBE~"mpS
International Association of Fire Chiefs
International Society of Fire Service Instructors
National Fire Protection Association
North Carolina Association of Fire Chiefs
PUBLlCATlONS
Nuclear Training - Reactive Approach, Specialized Training Centers
- Fire Chief Magazine, June 2003
Iii
James Stumbo Resume
EDUCATION:
University of Tennessee
Bochelor of Architecture
Knoxville, Tennessee
REGISTRATION:
North Carolina Registration 5728
South Carolina Registration 6396
National Council Of Architectural Registration Boards
I
PROFESSIONAL E~"PERIENCE:
Stewm1- Cooper - Newell- Architects, P.A.,
Principal, Project Architect
1999 to present
Gastonia, North Carolina
CBSAArchitects,
ProjectArchitect
1986 - 1999
HickOlY, North Carolina
RECENT PROJECTS:
Ken has served as Principal in Charge or Consultant on the follov,;ng projects:
City ofGreenville, NC Fire Training Facility Master Pian & Station
Design
Guilford Technical College Fire Training Facility & Training Station
Design ,
Sandhills Community College Fire Training Facility Master Plan
Sandhilis Community College Residential Bum Building
Ircdell County, NC Fire Training Facility
City ofMidJand, NC Fire Training Facility
Cape Fear Community College Fire Training Facility
Western Piedmont Fire Training Facility
James Stumbo, AlA, NCARB Resume
USi
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
80Q..671-0621
Current Fire Projects
)
Ken Newell, AlA, Lead Design Architect, Principal-In-Charge
North Port, Florida Fire - Currently in Design Development
Maumelle, Arkansas Fire - Currently in Schematic Design
Westem Coventry, Rhode tsland - Currently in Programming
Wake County Fire - Indefinite Delivery Contract
Clayton Fire - Currentiy in Construction
Bay Leaf Fire - Currently in Design Devetopment
Bahama Fire - Currently in Construction
Rock Hill Fire - Third Prototype Station Currently in Design
Lincolnton City Hall & Fire Headquarters - Currently in Construction
Virginia Beach Fire - Currently on Hold
Murphy Fire - Currently in Bidding & Negotiation
Hilton Head tsland - Second Prototype Station Currently in Construction
Third Prototype Station Currently in Design
South Point Fire - Currently in Schematics
Greenville Fire, SC - Currently in Construction
Erwin Fire - Currently in Construction
Weaverville Fire - Currently in Programming
Asheville Fire - Currently in Schematic Design
E/on Fire - Currently in Bidding & Negotiation
Pinehurst Fire - Currently in Bidding & Negotiation
Fayeffeville Fire - Currently in Construction
Gary Fire - Currently in Construction Documents
Crowders Mountain Fire - Currently in Bidding & Negotiation
.1
Jim Stumbo, AlA, Design Architect
Guilford Technical Community College Fire Training- Currently in Construction Administration
Kitty Hawk Fire - Currently in Design Development
National Guard Airport Fire - Currently in Construction
Catawba Fire - Currently in Programming
Asheville Fire - Currently in Schematic Design
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
..--
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
~
Emergency Services Training Facility
Contact
Dr, Richard Miller
704-922-6405
I
Proiect
This addition to the Southern portion of the
Campus Master Plan concentrated on the
growth of the Emergency ManagementTraining
Complex. The additions include a classroom
building, breathing apparatus unit, residential
burn building, garage and maintenance unit.
The complex currently includes a burn building,
drill tower, burn pits, confined space rescue,
and driving track.
The Regional Emergency Services Training
Center provides basic, continuing, and ad-
vanced training to all areas of emergency
services: fire, rescue, law enforcement, and
emergency medical services.
Misc
This Complex has housed the North Carolina
Fire College twice since 1990.
Gaston College Regional Emergency Services Training Facility
Dallas, NC
I!i
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
Emeruency Services Training Facility
'1
41
..~
Facilitv
Classroom/Administration Building
15,700 SF
$1,378,000 Base Bid
Contact
Phil Welch
Director
704-922-6258
I
Desian Issues
This facility was designed to accommodate
all administrative and indoor training activi-
ties for the Fire program, EMS program and
Criminal Justice Academy. It includes 13
offices, 9 labs/classrooms, physical training,
conference rooms, workrooms, shower/
locker rooms, and other support spaces.
Also included is a covered pavilion for
training activities assaciated with the
adjacent burn buildings and other "dirty"
training props. While matching the adjacent
campus aesthetics, the building was de-
signed as a pre-engineered structure to
help achieve a limited project budget.
Gaston College Regional Emergency Services Training Facility
Dallas, NC
mi
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0521
Emergency Services Training Facility
)
Contact
Phi! Welch - D!rector
704-922-6258
Desian Issues
This Live Fire Structure is a five story, 21,000 SF
facility with three live burn floors and 14 interior burn
areas. The lower level is constructed to simulate
areas of a nuclear reactor building. This facility also
houses a pitched-roof ventilation training area, a
five-story vertical confinement shaft, and an 1800
SF smoke maze.
)
)
Facilitv
20,459 SF
5 Story Burn Building
Training Tower
Burn Pits (Fuel Oil & LP)
Driving Course
Auto Extraction Pits
$1,400,000 Base Bid
Mise
At 20,459 Square feet, this is the largest Bum
Building in the United States, The structure is large
enough to allow multiple evolutions to be conducted
simultaneously.
Gaston College Regional Emergency Services Training Facility
Dallas, NC
~
Stewart Cooper NewellArchitects
800-671-0621
, . '''';;.:J~~;~t''''.r~':";'1'\7''-.:~. >r ,." ,-~
~., ~ , I ~~!$'1~'J,\\t1!lOM)~~t~ \~'f';..:h:', ~__.. J~lt~~, \ : 'j 1< ~
Emeroeocy Services TI-ainioo Facility
>'> .
Conlact
Phil Welch - Director
704-922-6258
Desion Issues
Prior to the completion ofthls project, all on-site,
residential training simulation had to be performed in
the adjacent commercial bum building. The shear size
and configuration of the large burn building severely
limited the realism of a residential setting, The
residential burn building is unlike most any others
currently in use in that the floor plan mimics a three
bedroom, two bath single family dwelling. It is con-
structed of masonry walls and a concrete roof deck.
Each room has appropriate heat shields in order to
protect the structure from heat associated with limited
live bums. Trench drains are continuous throughout the
building for training and building wash-down. A sloped,
frame roof was set above the concrete roof deck for
more realistic training scenarios that include a continu~
GUS heaUsmoke shaft for roof penetration training.
Many of the beneficial details utilized In the commercial
bum building were incorporated into this structure.
Facilitv
1500 SF
$ 75,000 Estimated Base Bid
Gaston College Regional Emergency Services Training Facility
Dallas, NC
~
Stewart Cooper NewellArchitects
800-671-0621
Emergency Services Training Facility
I
I
"
\
i GUILFORD TECH EMERGENCY TRAINING FACILITY
:>lrT'~_~N----~--~_._-- ._~~-
~ S~:!i=~,::~~~:;~~7well~tChHe;~s
Contact
Lloyd Stanley - Director
336-3344822
Proiect
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects provided
Master Planning services for the new Guilford
Technical Community College Emergency
Services Training Center. Many factors had to
be considered on this challenging 16 acre site.
This facility is situated between the northern
border of the campus, a Southern Railroad
right-of-way, a natural gas distribution site on
the eastem border, and a high power line
traverses the site.
Misc
This site was ultimately master planned for a
four-story burn building, a four-story training
tower, a classroom building. an apparatus
building and multiple exterior training aids such
as vehicle extrication, burn pits, and testJdrafting
pits.
"~"" ,.-: ,,'.'>~:.,~1i::~::'r. ;.~ -.,Jc '~::-~_
Guilford Technical Community College
Jamestown, NC
mi
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
Emergcncy SCI-vices Training Facility
"_:'". "/=!-":i~E:~_~~,_
_I
<__~.,:.;-,,-.~;;;e
Contact
Lloyd Stanley - Director
336-334-4822
Desian Issues
The burn building is designed for Class A
combustible bums with bum shields directly
above the bum pads to protect the concrete
ceiling slabs from spalding due to the heat. The
structural floor is protected at each bum area by
a sloped topping slab and fire brick. The facility
is also designed so a sloped residential style
roof can be added to practice residential roof
venting.
F acilitv
20,459 SF
4 Story Burn Building
Burn Pits
Driving Course
$1,660,000 Base Bid
Misc
Stewart Cooper Newell also provided master
planning services forthis facility. This was
Phase I of a three phase project, phased to
meet the owner's capital outlay schedule,
Guilford Technical Community College
Jamestown, NC
~
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
Emergency Services Training Facility
'T-'.
1---
r~
~ ..
.--.~-- ... "'\\ ,'__ - -I I ~---:
.___ .,... ~ ,~. ~-"'-~-\. ~.. L-~5 i
I - I I '-'1 ~ r-'
1 i ~ I: L..,ii'
~:_~l
, 1
: i
~- . - ,
f ~7l
...
......"""~l~....
.....,oow.."""<l<J'5
!'-i
I '
-'
["1
~-,
\"f;.fT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
.....,.A''''''''....."*''.
~(~._--- ~.,-,,~~,,--l,~
1=! "
--- ----- - -----...~/ ~
................,""""'l
I r...~ .-nnw-.oow......n~~
I I
,
/'C. .......... """" ow- ':"''''''<><>0''''''''''''''' 10"'........
L.,L.'.
- \
"1
L..
'\\.
,,-,.,-""..."""
u
o
l~ 0
U t ,
'-~SI"':Ui'Co/lll'f'fi....D'ArellUeeb ) I
iiiiI___ _ ,
, ,
.... - . .- -
RIGHT El FVATlON
REAR ELEVATION
Contact
Ms. Joyce Rhodes
Dean of Continuing Education
910-695-3767
or
Mr. Ron Peters
Special Project Manager
910-695-3837
F acilitv
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects is sched-
uled to proceed during the summer of 2004
with design services for a new residential
bum facility and Phase I site preperation.
This work will be located at the new Sand hills
Community College Emergency Services
Training Facility. The residential burn building
will be two stories, and includes attic ventila-
tion and attic access, as well as multiple burn
sites located in the entry, bedrooms, living
areas, and the kitchen.
G ~:~i '~J,,---~] _
....-C~"c-T_~;;i
Jt~j, :;j~i.:
ti'--"7'-"~'-~'1!i
,-1, ..;"11- I
--, ....!;.,.,"-!,j-..i!
" ....F-:;<~_<.)
r'=-~ftfjJTt
loC<OU1$,...nF~~
~~~~
........rw.._.............
~-~
8.I.NJHUS C~ COl.UOE
.'::."'~~
Misc
Stewart Cooper Newell also provided Master
Planning and Site Selection services to the
College. Although related, the master plan
and the residential bum building underwent
seperate architectural selection processes.
Sandhills Community College
Pinehurst, NC
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
~
Public Safety Facility
)
-~--
Contact
Robert T. Boland
Kershaw County Administrator
(formerly Clarendon County Administrator)
803-425-1500
Station
22,600 SF - Sheriffs Office
19,600 SF - Fire Department
$2,000,000 - Sheriffs Office
$1,900,000- Fire Department
Completed 2002 - Sheriff's Department
Completed 1999 - Fire Department
The Fire Department has living quarters,
kitchen, lounge, and drive through apparatus
bays. The Sheriffs Office includes a large
evidence room, crime laboratory, training and
briefing area, library, and interview rooms. The
second floor of the Sheriffs Office is available
for future expansion.
Desiqn Issues
This facility houses the Clarendon County Fire
Department Headquarters, the Clarendon
County Sheriffs Office, and the County 911
communications center. The three facilities are
completely independent with separate en-
trances, offices, conference rooms, and locker
rooms.
Clarendon County, SC
~
stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
Headquarters Fire Station
, ;.'i~:l,;' "'<<~"\:L^. 'r ,
T/.. - _ ,.~'";'"Il~!~~\.~.tof!~':"''''''~' ,I' "., '....
~~".w ,.~~,
Deslan Issues
The Gastonia Fire Department headquarters station
was in desperate need of replacement. As part of a
larger bond referendum, the citizens of Gastonia
funded the design and construction of a new head-
quarters station that would serve both the administra-
tive and fire service functions of the department. The
new 24,000 SF station has 4 drive through apparatus
bays, 1 maintenance bay, individual sleep rooms,
fitness areas, large kitchen, and dayroom. The
Administrative suite has offices and conference
rooms for Chief, the Assistant Chiefs, other adminis-
trative personal, along with a large training rooms for
continuing education and use by the citizens. The
Station also includes a museum highlighting the
history of the Fire Service in Gastonia.
"Ot.~fti
"k>:.ow
Contact
Chief Bob Ridgeway
704-866-6806
Station
24,000 SF
$2,400,000 Base Bid
Gastonia, NC
~
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
Headq uarters Station
Contact
Chief Domenic Manera
803-684-1700
or
Trey Eubanks - City Manager
803-684-1700
Station
12,240 SF
$988:000 Base Bid
Desian Issues
With a growing population and a desire to offer its
citizens the best public safety service possible the
City decided to move the Fire Department out of the
Police Department and into its own facility, The new
headquarters station is located next door to their old
shared facility and in the heart of the historic
downtown district. Before we began design we did a
comprehensive study of the departments needs and
designed a station that will serve the department for
the next 20 - 30 years. To meet the design guide-
lines of the historic district we used a split level
design to reduce the buildings height, a hip roof that
blended in with the surrounding buildings,and
include the columned entry. Inside the station has 4
drive through truck bays, sleep rooms, training!
community room which is connected to the kitchen,
a storage mezzanine above the truck bays, and
offices for the administrative staff, storage and bunk
rooms that can sleep up to eight in semiprivate
areas.
City of York, SC Fire Department
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
~
Prototype Fire Substation
Desian Issues
This station serves the fastest growing area of
the town. It is a traditional two drive-through bay
station with sleep rooms, day room, kitchen,
laundry room, and large meeting room/dining
room area in the main entry. The design is to
serve as a prototype for future Kernersville -
substations.
Contact
Chief Jimmy Barrow
336-996-4885
Station
6,895 SF
$820,000 Base Bid
Mise
A unique aspect of this station is the Police
satellite station that is included in the rear of the
station. This 250 square foot area is completely
separate from the fire station and houses a
bathroom, desks, and separate entry, EMS
crews were added to the station after construc-
tion, and also have their own sleep area, which
is separate so that their calls will not interrupt the
firefighters on duty.
Kernersvil1c, NC Fire Department
m!
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
Prototype Fire Substation
Desian Issues
This station serves the fastest growing area of
the town. It is a traditional two drive-through bay
station with sleep rooms, day room, kitchen,
laundry room, and large meeting room/dining
room area in the main entry. The design is to
serve as a prototype for future Kernersville
substations.
Contact
Chief Jimmy Barrow
336-996-4885
Station
6,895 SF
$820,000 Base Bid
Misc
A unique aspect of this station is the Police
satellite station that is included in the rear of the
station. This 250 square foot area is completely
separate from the fire station and houses a
bathroom, desks, and separate entry. EMS
crews were added to the station after construc-
tion, and also have their own sleep area, which
is separate so that their calls will not interrupt the
firefighters on duty,
Kernersvi1le, NC Fire Department
mi
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
Fire Training References
Gaston College, Dallas. NC
1: Master Planning and Site Evaluation for a new Emergency Services Training Facility
IT: Design of Emergency Training Facility, including Burn Billlding, Driving Track, Rescue & Bum Pits
III: Design of a new Residential Burn Building
TV: Design of a new Classroom and Administration Building
Contact:
Mr. Phil Welch, Director: 704-922-6200
Sand Hills Community College. Pinehurst. NC
I: Feasibility Study and Site Selection for a new Emergency Services Training Facility
II: Master Planning and Schematic Design of a new Residential Burn Building. Commercial Burn Building!
Drill Tower, and Bum Pits
Contact:
Ms. Joyce Rhodes, Dean of Continuing Education: 910-695-3767
Mr. Ron Peters, Special Projects Manager. 910-695-3837
Mr. Richard Gough, VPfor Business & AdministTative Services: 910-695-3766
City of Greenville. NC
Feasibility Study and Master Plan for a new Emergency Training Facility and on-site Fire Station
Contact:
Chief Roy Spell: 252-329-4404
Guilford Technical Community College, Tamestown ,NC
I: Design of Emergency Training Facility, including Burn Building. Residential Burn Building. Driving.Traek
II: Design of a new Training Tower
lIT: Design of a new Classroom Building
Contact:
Lloyd Stanley: 336-334-4822
New Hanover County, NC
Feasibility Study and Master Plan for a new Emergency Services Training Facility
Contact:
Mr. Max Maxwell: Engineering Department; 910-798-7139
Cape Fear Community College
Design of a new Emergency Services Training Facility (scheduled for fall 2004)
Contact:
Chief Donnie Hall: 91~-798-7462
/'-
I!i
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
References - Fire
City of Gastonia, NC Fire Department
Chief Robert I<idgeway: 704-866-6740
Prototype design for 3 Substations
New Headquarters Station
Design of 3 (non-prototype) Substations
Clarendon County, SC Fire Department
Mr. Bobby Boland, City Manager: 803-425-1500
New PubLic Safety Complex housing Fire Headquarters Station
911 Center, and Sheriff's Department
Town of Hilton Head Island, SC Fire & Rescue Department
Chief Tom Fieldstead: 843-682-5100
Prototype Design for two new Substations
Design of a new Communications Building
City of Rock Hill, SC Fire Department
Chief Mike Blackmon: 803-329-7220
Prototype Design for two new Substations
Town of Pine Knoll Shores, NC Fire Department
Town Manager Ms. Betty Carr. 252-247-4353
Design of Public Safety Building including Fire and Police Departments
City of Greenville, SC Fire Department
Deputy Fire Chief Delma Lord, Jr.: 864-467-4462
Prototype Design of two ne\",1 Substatlof'.5
City of Clayton, NC Fire Department
Chief Lee Barbee: 919-553-1755
Design of new Fire Headquarters Station
Glassy Mountain Volunteer Fire Department, Landrum, SC
Chief Brian Riebe: 864-895-4036
Renovations and Additions to Headquarters Station
Town of Morehead City, NC Fire Department
Chief Jerry Leonard: 252-247-2611
Design of new Fire & EMS Substation
Simpsonville, SC Fire Department
Chief Jess Major: 864-967-9545
Design of new Fire Substation
City of Cherryvillc, NC Fire Department
Chief Jeff Cash: 704-435-1730
Renovation and Addition Study for a new Fire Headquarters
Design of new Fire Headquarters
Lincoln County, NC EMS Department
Direc'tor Ron Rombs: 704-732-9077
Design of new EMS Headquarters
City of Lincolnton, NC Fire Department
Chief Don Wise: 704-736-8980
Renovation and Additions for a combined Fire Headquarters and City Hall
~
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
References - Fire
CIty of Erwin, NC Fire Department
Asst. Chief Ricky Illackmon: 919-557-3916
Renovations and Additions of Fire Department Headquarters
Town of Kernersville, NC Fired Deparlmcnt
Chief Jimmy Barrow: 336-996-4027
New Fire Substation, EMS & Police Satellite Station
City of Claremont, NC Fire Dcparlment
CiltJ Manager Dean McGinnis: 828-459-7009
Design of new Fire Headquarters
City of IGngs Mountain, NC Fire Deparlmcnt
Jimmy Maney: 704-739-8551
Design of new Fire Substation
City of Hickory, NC Fire Department
DepultJ Chief George Byers: 828-323-7420
Design of new Fire Substation
Village of Pinehurst, NC Fire Department
Chief Jimmy McCaskil~ 910-295-5575
Feasibility Study
Design of new Fire Station
Little River Fire Department, Horry County, SC
Chief Randy Webster: 843-248-1370
Design of new Fire Substation
)
City of York, SC Fire Department
Chief Domenic Manera: 803-684-1700
Design of Fire Department Headquarters
City of Thomasville, NC Fire Department
Chief Marty Dailey: 336-475-5524
Prototype Design for two new Substations
Federal Point Fire & Rescue Department, New Hanover County, NC
Chief Donnie Hall: 910-798-7462
Design of new Fire Substation
Allendale County, SC Fire Department
Feasibility Study for new Fire Headquarters
Town of Bahama, NC Fire & Rescue Department
Chief Len Needham: 919-%2-9699
Design of new Headquarters Station
Design of new Substation
Old Richmond Volunteer Fire Deparlment, Tobaccoville, NC
Chief Alan Farris: 336-924-6867
Design of new Fire Department Headquarters
Town of Liberty, NC Fire Department
Chief J.R. Beard: 336-622-9050
Design of new Fire Headquarters
~
Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
800-671-0621
Tommy A. Abercrombie
Emergency Service Training Facility Design Consultant
Resume
Recent Project Experience:
Tarrant County College Fire Service Troining Center
Responsible for all aspects of the facility including initial concept,
specifications, business pion, ond construction oversight.
9701 ARGYLE COURT' GRANBURY, TEXAS 71i049
PHONE 817-279~010G' E-MAIL TLABERCROMBIE@CHARTER.NET
T01111Y L. ABERCRO-MBIE
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
WORK EXPERIENCE
';. '. '. L "- ~ -< '.,~ ......>-~,
"~,"~ ~ J'" '''~,~c_.~ '-
-7'o.J.;~~~'.f~~:rr6' "',
~l;'.i~~ h --<"
I
.
1992 - Present Tarrant County College Fort Worth, Texas
Administrative Coordinat01j Fire SenJice Training Center
. Director of major fire service training facility responsible for educational
and training programs including A.A.S. degree programs, fircflghtcr
certification programs, continuing education programs, and 1n-senrice
tramJrlg programs.
. Led the development of a 20 million dollar state-of-the-art fire service
training facility that is the largest computer controlled gas fired facility in
the United States. Responsible for all aspects of the facility including
initial concept, specifications, business plan, and construction oversight.
The 23-acrc facility consists of a 48,000 square foot high tech classroom
and administration building coupled with a multi hazard disaster city
complete with man made raging river. This highly integrated facility is
one of the most technologically advanced emergency service training
facilities in the world.
. Responsible for massive expansion and upgrade of programs and
curticulum offerings designed to meet the increasing responsibilities
placed on the modern firefighter and emergency responder.
. Led initiative to develop programs to provide emergency training and
awareness programs to federal agencies and private industry. Program
has led to agreements to provide training to agencies such as the'
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Department of
Defense, TXU Energy, and Motoro",- Corporation
1994 - Present Ft. Worth Fire Department
Lieutenant/ Training Officer
. Training Officer of recruit training station responsible for directing the
training of all new recruits for large metropolitan fire department.
. Oversee instructional staff that provides both initial and ongoing
training for department.
. Responsible for creation of and delivery of continuing education and in
service training for department.
. Officer in charge of 24-hour emergency response crew
Fort Worth, Texas
I'
1996 - Present 1'. L. Abercrombie Consulting Granbury, Texas
Architectura/ Design Consultant
. Consultant to architectural and engineering fInns providing content
information in regards to the design and function of emergency set'itice
training facilities,
. Higher Education Design Consultant
. Architectural Programming Research
.Fire Service Consultant
. Provide contract training to f1+e departments and emergency response
organizations.
. Develop curriculum for fIre departments covering a wide range of
emergency service topics.
. Develop testing and assessment programs for fire department
promotional exams.
. Consultant to higher education organizations on topics related to
education for the emergency service responder.
. Fire service educational publishing review services.
1991 -1994 Haltom City Fire Department Haltom City, Texas
.Firefighter
iiI Training Officer for suburban fire departrnent responsible for
development and delivery of both fuc and emergency medical training.
. Developed community 'Wide emergency management p1an..
. Public information offIcer for department responsible for hoth internal
and external communication including community education.
EDUCATION
Current
University of Missow:i
Columbia, Missouri
PhD in progress Human Environmental Design: Architectural Studies
2004 Texas Christian University
Master of Liberal Arts
FortWorth, Texas
2001 University of Oklahoma
Bachelor of Liberal Studies
Norman, Oklahoma
1998 Tarrant County Junior College Fort Worth, Texas
Associate of Applied S cima, Fire Protection Technology
PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLICATIONS
Presentations
NISOD International Conference on Teaching & Leadership Excellence
Texas S tate Fire Chiefs Association
Firehouse World Exposition
Firehouse on the Road
Department ofIntcrior Design Texas Christian University
Steelcase Furniture Companies
Publications
Firehouse Magazine
Fire Instructor Magazine
Popular Mechanics
PROJECT APPROACH
The past decades have seen a marked increase in the responsibilities of Police and Fire Departments. Once
limited to fighting structural fires, Fire Departments are now required to respond to 0 variety of other emergen-
cies ranging from hazard material spills to search and rescue. Police Departments hove evolved from just hav-
ing "cops on the beat" to having Tactical Units. These transformations hove necessitated 0 change in the type
of training, and the type of training facilities required.
Though built for today's threats, Kirkpatrick Architecture Studio (KAS) and Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
[SCN) believe that these training facilities should be ftexible enough to allow for the training of the unforeseen.
The training facility needs to accommodate some shored needs between the Fire and Police Departments,
while meeting their individual training needs. Historically, Fire and Police are interconnected by the common
goal that demands serving the community and its citizens as guardians of public health, safety, and welfare.
KAS and SCN ore excited for the opportunity to continue the relationship with the City of Denton that was
begun with the Central Fire Station. Because of the success of that project, KAS has reunited that team of
consultants. We believe that keeping this team together will facilitate the success of the project by removing
the learning curve involved at the start of most jobs, and by capitalizing on our familiarity with the City, its needs
and its processes.
For the present project we are happy to be able to utilize the team's expertise in law enforcement and training
facilities and to build on our relationship with the Denton Police Deportment. As a means to address the com-
prehensive needs of this project, we hove included Tammy Abercrombie as 0 member of our team, an Emer-
gency Services and Fire Service Consultant.
Our team is uniquely qualified to program and master plan a training facility, having an architect, user/opera-
tor, and engineer who all hove previous experience wifh the process.
Further, combining Mr. Abercrombie's experience os Administrative Coordinator for the Fire Service Training
Center at Tarrant County College with KAS' extensive experience working with higher educafional insfifufians
will enable us to work well with the representative from North Central Texas College.
Besides uniquely suited to design the facilities, we ore uniquely concerned with their success. Its success direct-
ly impacts the safety of our families and our community.
)
)
)
I
K
RKPATR
C K
ARC H
TECTURE
S T U D
o
Working with City Departments to Accomplish the Project
KAS proved with the Central Fire Station that thorough planning and intimate knowledge of the owner's opera-
tions facilitates a smooth project from schematic design through construction, resulting in award-winning facili-
ties.
Kick-Off Meeting
We would request a meeting with representatives of all end-users of the future focility. In addition to the Po-
lice and Fire Departments, we envision this including representatives from Purchasing, Facilities Management,
the City Manager's office, utilities, Planning, and Engineering. This gives everyone the opportunity to meet the
project players. At this meeting the project goals and objectives would be determined. The process would be
described and all players wauld leave with knowledge af the data that will be requested of them
Design Charette
We will begin the design process with a several day in-house design charette with KAS, SCN, our consultants
and representatives fram the City of Denton. With the Central Fire Statian, this madel proved to not anly be an
excellent model far allowing the owner to communicate their needs, but it gave everyone on the team owner-
ship in the building's design, aH \ovhile greatly shortening the typical schematic design phase.
Programming Por/ion
Denton has provided a program for the new training facility and fire station. We would meet with end-users
to confirm all activities are accommodated for and land/space/size requirements for each of those activities.
Any refinement of the program can occur at this meeting. The result of this meeting will be a draft written pro-
gram that identifies:
. Training Scenarios, including confined space, roof venting, etc.
. Training Evolutions, including number af repetitions, number of fire fighters per evolution, activities, etc.
. Burn prop types, specifically Closs A or Class B (combustible or gas) props.
. All other focility activities, interior and exterior.
. The size of space requirement for every activity.
. The estimated cost of construction for the facilities.
. Potentiol phasing oppartunities for constructian
Planning Por/ion
After the pragram has been honed, the next step is to produce a preliminory master plan. The relationships of
the parts of the training facility are critical to the success of the project. After a preliminary master plan is de-
veloped, the second part ot the charette would design the fire station itself.
K
RKPATR
C K
ARC H
TECTURE
S T U D
o
Development of Schematic Design
Following the charette, weekly meetings would be held with the some City representatives until 0 final sche-
matic design is produced.
The Programming meeting outlined above results in the Owner's "wants". By presenting those wants in the
Presentation of Draft Program, we are able to inform the Owner of their associated costs. This allows us oppor-
tunity to recommend to the Owner potential activities that could be reduced, eliminated, or designed for a
future construction phase. By showing the Owner what other clients have done in similar situations, we are able
to provide direction to Owner,
Presentation ot the Final Schematic Design
Based on Owner approval of the preceding phase, the final submission of all data will be provided. This will
include rendered drawings along with the bound, written report that outlines the entire planning process and
the results.
This presentation will also include construction estimates for Fire Station #7 and for the entire master planned
project. Cost estimating will be done through a third party estimator.
Design Development
Weekly meetings between KAS, consultants, and the City representatives will continue through the end of
Design Development. This close working relationship promotes communication and owner awareness of the
project and hopefully, eliminates the source of most change orders. Further, it leads to a building that is not
only beautiful. but serves the owner's needs completely.
While developing the drowingswe will actively pursue pricing input to maintain fiscal control.
Construction Documents
Based on Owner approval of the preceding phase, the Construction Documents will be completed. The 75%
Issue will be priced to ensure the project will conform to the budget before going out to bid.
Bidding / Contract Negotiation'
KAS and SCN will assist the City of Denton with receipt of proposals and negotiating a construction contract.
Construction Administration
Even with our reputation for complete construction drawings, the construction process sometimes provides un-
foreseen issues or necessitates changes. Believing that the client's interests are best served when the Architect
is active in the construction process; KAS' commitment to having Project Manager in the field is unparalleled,
Whenever an issue arises, KAS can be at Facilities Management's office in less than five minutes.
L Throughout the entire process KAS will orchestrate the involvement of consultants, be responsible for schedul-
ing, and maintain primary client contact.
KIRKPATR
C K
ARC H
TECTURE
S T U D
o
)
Working with City Staff
Purchasing Department
Relying on our experience working with the City of Denton. we will assist Purchasing in the preparation of bid
documents. We will then assist them in the soliciting bids from general contractors and the subsequent evalu-
ation of those bids. After the selection of the contractor. KAS would attend the pre award meeting with the
contractor and be available to advise on the drafting of the contractor's contract.
Facitities Management
It is important to get Facilities Management involved in the process early. so that we produce 0 building that
Denton con easily maintain. To achieve this. Facilities needs to be consulted when writing our specifications
and when designing the HV AC, electrical. and plumbing systems. Early consultation con prevent difficult
changes later in the process.
utilities
Due to the size of the site and the uniqueness of its development. we will involve Utilities in the master planning
process and continue to work with them. so that this project is in concert with Denton's long range plans for util-
ity development.
Division of Environmental Quality
We will work with this division to coordinate with the City's environmental management efforts. We are espe-
cially sensitive that every effort is taken to protect the Hickory Creek Watershed. By detaining water runoff on
the site. we could help recharge the ground water. create aesthetically pleasing site features. and diminish the
capitol costs associated with storm sewer.
Environment Committee
While currently Denton does not have green building criteria. we understand that it may produce something
within the next few months. This project is the City's first for this committee to hove input from the start. We
will work with this committee and the user groups to determine \-vhich green strategies are appropriate for this
project.
Planning
Even though this is a City project. it will still hove to meet 011 Development Codes. Hoving Planning involved in
the Kick-off Meeting. or having 0 separate meeting before the Kick-off Meeting. would be essential in 0 smooth
project.
Engineering
For the success of the project. Engineering's knowledge of the growth of Denton and the City's Mobility Plan will
be essential. Their input will help us determine the best placement of the different components of the project.
Our civii engineer will be well versed with Denton's requirements.
Working with Community Groups
The scope of this project and it's proximity to residential areas will necessitate meetings with community groups.
While having general experience in presenting in open community meetings. KAS has specific experience
presenting to. and serving on. Denton's community groups. The feedback and insight gained in these meetings
can be crucial to the project's success.
K
RKPATR
C K
ARCHITECTURE
S T U D
o
Sustainability
That the buildings we build and the places we create should promote the health of it's users, respect the land
and community on which it is dependent, and minimize any environmental impacts is a fundamental tenet
of architecture. KAS is committed to the development of sustainable design in hopes that eventually it may
become known as what it is...good design. Further, we see the green building strategies that emerge in this
development, not as a "ought to do" out of shame or guilt, but as a "should do," because they will provide
quantitative and qualitative benefits to the City of Denton.
With years of experience, and with a LEED Accredited Professional on staff, we will work with you to evaluate
which green building strategies are applicable to this project. These strategies are too numerous to fully discuss
here, but we offer a few for your consideration.
Energy
Buildings use one-third of America's total energy and about two-thirds of its electricity. New efficient HVAC sys-
tems, daylighting controls, high performance building envelopes, and other innovations can reduce traditional
energy costs by over half. These systems, however, are constrained by the architect's siting of the building and
his knowledge of the site's micro-climate.
Dole W, Coffey Consulting Engineers (DWCCE) has designed geo-thermol mechanical systems for several differ-
ent types of c1ientle.
KAS used the thermal mass of thick masonry walls and the insulation of the earth to design a highly energy ef-
ficient for the Texas Employment Commission.
Indoor Environmental Quality
With the mountain of evidence available, there is no debate that when occupants hove thermal comfort,
natural light and 0 view, 0 healthy workplace, and are able to hear themselves think productivity rises. This rise
con be between six and sixteen percent. This Is not to mention higher retention rates and fewer sick days.
KAS understood this when they designed Borman Elementary and Evers Elementary. By designing the windows
_I specific to the elevation they faced, KAS was able to maximize the daylightlng for the classrooms and minimize
solar heat gain.
With overage Americans spending over 80% of their time indoors, "off gassing" from paints, adhesives and con-
struction materials con greatly impact their health. This consideration should be given even to inmates. So for
the additions to the Denton Jail, we specified low-VOC points. Where we had to use epoxy paint on cell doors
and windows, we had those pointed off-site.
Water
Once used without thought, it is now clear water is a commodity to be used with thrift. Low flow toilets, water-
less urinals, gray water systems, rain water harvesting and other strategies would be applicable to this project.
But more importantly, with the amount of water that will be used in the burn props, a water reclamation system
will be needed. Kimley Horn provided just such 0 system for the Tarrant County College Fire Service Training
Center.
Site
The Training Center portion of the project will hove specific challenges to ensure that the site and surrounding
community is treated with sensitivity. Among these challenges is how to abate the heavy metals, mostly lead,
from the firing range which can contaminate the land and the ground water. There are several options we will
review, from altering the traditianal berm design to, to bullet traps, to using lead-free ammunition.
K
RKPATR
C K
ARC H
TECTURE
S T U D
o
Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc.
Civil Engineering Consultant
)
.J
~=~
J
)
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
John 9. Blacker, P.E. - Fire Training Facility Civil Engineering
Significant Past Proiects, cont.
training, The tacility also includes a specialized aircraft fire trainer (SAFT), which consists of wing and tail
engine fires, a wheel/brake fire scenario, galley, lavatory, cockpit, APU, and baggage compartment fires and
an interior cabin fire with flashover.
Blue Grass Airport ARFF Training Facility, Lexington, KY - Project manager overseeing design of the
facility, which includes an 85.foot-diameter fuel-spill burn area with the infrastructure designed to support the
future expansion of the trainer to 125.foot diameter in order to meet the needs of the Index "E" training level.
The facility will also include an SAFT consisting of a wheel/brake fireplace, a wing engine fireplace, and an
interior cabin fireplace, all propane fueled and computer controlled.
Washington Dulles International Airport Live-Fire Training Facility - Project manager for the design of
this facility that includes a computer-controlled, propane-tueled, 125-foot-diameter fuel spill burn area,
vehicle maneuvering area, control tower, propane distribution system, and vehicle extrication pad. The lacility
will be designed to allow for the future expansion to include an administration building, a specialized aircraft
fire trainer (SAFT), and a stiuctuial fires trainer.
Chicago O'Hare International Airport ARFF Training Facility, Symtron Systems, inc., Chicago, IL.-
Project manager for modifications to the design of this facility, which consists of a 125-foot-diameter fuel-spill
burn area with a separate aircraft fire trainer. The project was designed prior to the equipment supplier
selection, and once the supplier was on board, John's team modified site plans to meet their equipment
needs. This included updating the fuel spill burn area drainage, propane bunkers and mockup foundations,
modifying the aircraft fire trainer foundation, coordination with the propane system designer, and revisions to
the electrical power and control system.
Salt Lake City Airport Burn Pit Relocation, Salt Lake City, UT - Project manager for design of this,
fraining facility that has a 125-foot-diameter fuel-spill burn area with an active aircraft fires trainer mockup in
the center. The project was designed by another AlE firm but re-assigned to John's team at 50 percent level
of completion, and they eliminated plan inconsistencies and finished the project as the engineer-ol-record.
Taxiway C Extension at Dallas/Fort Worth international Airport, TX - Project design engineer
responsible for initial layout of the taxiway extension and taxilanes, including both horizontal geometry and
vertical profiles. He was also design civil engineer for the rehabilitation of Runway 13U31 R at Dallas Love
Field. The project included resurfacing of 7,752 feet of runway, associated taxiway intersections, shoulders,
and lighting. He followed the project into construction as the onsite project engineer, supervising the
inspection of the $8 million project.
Runway Rehabilitation, Love Field Airport, Dallas, TX - Project engineer who helped with the rebuilding
of Runway 13U31 R within 140 calendar days, Project coordination required phasing work to complete all
removals, light installation, milling of old surface, asphalt bond breaker, and concrete paving with new
shoulder installation to take place while other runways were operational. Shoulder installation consisted of
~=~
)
J
)
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
John D. Blacker, P.E. - Fire Training Facility Civil Engineering
Significant Past Projects, cant.
old shoulder removal, lime treat sub-grade, new asphalt shoulder and re.working shoulder edge lighting
system, The project involved removing all existing runway and connecting taxiway lighting systems, removing
shoulders in their entirety, removing entire sections of the old runway, milling old runway to a plan profile
grade, replacing removed sections with concrete, installing new runway light systems imbedded in old
runway set to finish grade of new construction, asphalt bond breaker, concrete paving matching plan profile
and lighting system needs, and striping.
Alliance Air Trade Center, Haslet, TX - Project manager for the team that provided survey, platting,
easement preparation, and civil engineering services for the initial phase of a 26-acre industrial
office/warehouse development which included a 99,000 square.foot air cargo facility located adjacent to Fort
Worth's Alliance Airport, Kimley-Horn coordinated with the City of Fort Worth and their consultants on the
adjacent airport taxiway expansion project, worked with the City of Haslet on infrastructure and drainage
matters, and assisted the project design team in navigating through FAA development regulations,
The project was conditionally approved by the City of Hasle!.
Years of Experience
Kimley-Horn: 2
Other Firms: 18
Education and other Professional Qualifications
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Texas Tech University, 1985
Bachelor of Architecture, T exas Tech University, 1985
Professional Engineer in seven states
Member, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Member, American Institute of Architects (AlA)
John has 20 years of civil and structural engineering experience, strong architecture skills, and a broad
technical background in aviation/transportation, industrial, and specialized facility design. He is proficient not
only In managing the design of Fire Training Facilities, but also the management and design of Land
Development and Airport.specific projects including construction management and inspection projects. John
has been responsible for project management, budgeting, scheduling, and all areas of construction
management including construction administration and field resident engineering.
Cu"entProjectAssignmen~
Plana ISO Cox Building Addition - August 2004
Town Center Bank - August 2004
Decatur Industrial Park - September 2004
~=~
.J
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Jeffrey W. Linder, RLA - Landscape Architecture
Significant Past Projects
Master Park and Trail System Master Plan, Keller, TX - Project manager as Kimley-Hom updated the
city's comprehensive land use plan, which includes a park / trail system master plan. The project team,
updated Keller's trail system plan and addressed the need tor a recirculating plan, since the city lost 2,5
miles in its southern sector. Kimley-Horn also coordinated Texas Parks & Wildlite issues, identified trail
alignment /Iocations, provided linkage allematives for location of hike and bike trails, addressed the issue of
equestrian center relocalion, and identified two new-park locations,
Land Use Plan Update, Keller, TX - Project manager as Kimley.Hom updated the city's comprehensive
land use plan. The Phase I project scope included preparing land use standards and guidelines fof major
traffic corridors, developing guidelines for the analysis and review of property for zoning/rezoning, guiding
future residential land use densities; coordinating mutual land use proposals with adjoining communities,
guiding the land use issues for a portion of county property that may eventually be inside City limits,
determining industrial park land use, and developing guidelines for old downtown overlay district.
Woodway Beautification Plan, Woodway, TX - Team member during the development of a beautification
plan for the City of Woodway, which included an inventory of existing landscape enhancement and
identification of opportunities for future enhancement. Through coordinated efforts with TxDOT, City of
Woodway staff, and the Woodway Beautiful Commission, Kimley-Horn prepared a report that will allow for
consistent theming and provide guidance for City leaders as they work toward continued improvements.
Kimley-Horn noted key areas and provided a schematic design for each one that included cost opinions,
priority ranking and potential funding mechanisms.
North Tarrant Parkway Phase I, North Richland Hills, TX - Landscape task leader as Kimley-Horn
provided engineering design for the O,75-mile first phase of this roadway. The existing two-lane asphalt
roadway was extended to a six.lane divided principal arterial. This project is the City's northern gateway and
includes 45-foot parkways and 3D-foot medians with extensive landscaping and streetscaping. The projecl
scope included roadway design, paving, drainage, traffic signalization, construction sequencing, TxDOT and
franchise utility coordination, striping, street lighting, significant streetscaping and landscaping, and monthly
stakeholder newsletters.
North Cities Park Land Planning, Lewisville, TX - Project manager of the Kimley-Horn team that
prepared land use plans for a" 411-acre office, retail, commercial, and industrial development north and
south of SH 121 in the City of Lewisville. This project required coordination with city officials as well as
preliminary opinions of site development costs,
~=~
J
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Jeffrey lo/. Linder, RLA - Landscape Architecture
Significant Past Projects, cont.
Elm Fork Ranch, Carrollton, TX - Task manager during this land planning project for a 485.acre tract at
the northern edge of exisfing development and located on either side of the SH 121 Bypass Corridor. Team
responsibilities included parcelization, land use assignments, writing planned development zoning standards,
presentation of zoning request, and amendment of the city's thoroughfare master plan,
Piano DART Transportation Land Use Study, Piano, TX - Team planner who helped develop Station
Area Plans for two Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) light rail stations, Final station area plans include
design guidelines for implementation, station site plan, and transportation network modification
recommendations, as well as financing strategies for implementation of the land use recommendations.
Ultimately, the plans helped with reducing congestion, increasing accessibility, rnaximizing use of the transit
element, promoting strategic public and private development, and building consensus among DART, Piano,
and land owners,
Las Vegas Boulevard/4th Street Streetscape, Las Vegas, NV - Team planner who helped make
recommendations for functional and aesthetic improvements to the two-mile corridor. Irnprovements include
upgraded, wider sidewalks; new roadway surtacing, curb and gutter; upgraded streetlights, traffic signals,
and regulatory signage; pedestrian amenities including precast benches and waste containers; and
landscaping and irrigation improvements compatible with the arid climate of Las Vegas.
Heritage District Master Plan, Bonham, TX - Team planner for an overall revitalization program,
SelVices included urban planning, landscape architecture, signing and hardscape design (benches, lighting,
etc.), park planning, transportation planning, graphic design, and an extensive public involvement program.
Sun and Swim Children's Pool and Master Plan, Garland, TX - Team designer as Kimley-Horn worked
with the City of Garland on expansion plans for their aquatic facility, Additions included a new front gate,
expanded shaded seating, both a small and large children's play pool, and a slow river. Construction
documents for a Phase I Kid's Pool addition included zero-depth entry, interactive water play features, non-
slip surtacing. shade structures, and site furnishings.
Craig Ranch, McKinney, TX - Project planner for the Kimley-Horn team that worked with the City of ,
McKinney to help define a land use plan for the City's Regional Employment Center (REC). Project
responsibilities included drafting development standards for the overlay district and helping to define the
image of the area, since the properly was the first to deveiop in the new district. Uses in the development
include office, retail, campus commercial, mixed-use, and high, medium, and low-density residential. The
development also includes a hotel/convention center and a high-profile, destination-style PGA golf course
Sandy Lake Road Improvements, Coppelf, TX - Project planner. This project involved the design of the
reconstruction of a 1,g.rnile section between Denton Tap Road and MacArthur Boulevard, The scope
includes alignment and right-of-way determination, drainage evaluations, phased construction 01
approximately 10,500 feet of concrete pavement, curb and gutter, utility adjustments, relocation of a 30'inch
water line, design of a 3D-inch water line, traffic signalization. major landscape improvements, and irrigation.
~=~
I
J
I
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc,
Jeffrey W. Linder, RLA - Landscape Architecture
Significant Past Projects, cont.
This project also includes cross street grade adjustments, retaining walls for tree preservation, coordination
of franchise utilities, grade separation, and the design of an eventual four.lane fhoroughfare,
Spring Creek Parkway East Area Study, Piano, TX - lA task manager as in association with another
firm, Kimley.Horn developed alternative land use and transportation plans for an area in northeast Piano.
The area is bounded by North Central Expressway on the west, Spring Creek Parkway on the north, Rowlett
Creek on the east, and Bowman Branch on the south, Two land use alternatives for future development of
this area incorporating a Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) station, a civic center/auditorium, and a
community college site were prepared. A preferred alternative was developed incorporating each of the three
elements into the general plan.
Downtown Entry Corridor Improvements, las Vegas, NV - Team planner as Kimley-Horn served the City
of las Vegas for this multimillion dollar improvement to the downtown entry corridor. The project objective was
to enhance traffic flow with attention to enhancing capacity through implementation of 4th Street as one-way
northbound (three lanes) and special intersection design at 4th Street/las Vegas Boulevard. Project included
streetscape beautification and planning/design of hardscape and softscape elements to provide an enhanced
visual appeal to drivers and pedestrians. Kimley-Horn provided all preliminary and final plans, traffic signal
design, special lighting design, utility coordination, and an extensive public involvement program. The uniquely
designed corridor required non. standard lighting such as special HPS lighting fixtures, color coordinated poles,
MH up lighting at tree pits, and provisions for future neon lighting.
Education and other Professional Qualifications
Bachelor of landscape Architecture, Texas A&M University, 1995
Registered landscape Architect
Jeff Linder has 11 years of specialized experience in land planning and landscape architecture. His project
experience includes everything from municipal facilities and parks to roadway corridors and residential and
commercial developments. He also has expertise in urban design, site planning, zoning, annexation, and
streetscape design and he is well accustomed to working with the civil engineers on a project in order to
integrate planning and landscape architecture components as smoothly as possible.
Cu~entProjectAssignmen~
Saddle Club SF landscape Architecture. September 2004
Pollard Street Pedestrian Way - August 2004
lake Worth Parks Improvements - November 2004
)
'I
.)
State-of-the-Art Fire Technology Training Facility Opening in
North Texas
by
John D. Blacker, P.E.
America's fIrefighters are being called on today to do far more
than fight fires. Whether it's a hazardous-material spill, floodwater
rescue, underground gas leak, trench cave-in rescue, or chemical fue,
fIrefIghters more than anyone else are being asked to staff the front
lines.
At the same time, however, tax-strapped county and city
goverrunents have continued to reduce funding for fire and police
training - a decade-long trend. The gap between public safety needs
and adequate training for contemporary fuefIghters is growing at a
worrisome rate.
In North Texas, however, a community college system is
blazing a trail away from that trend. On the outskirts of Fort Worth,
the :Northwest CCh-npUS of Tful3.11t County College (Tee) in August
opened a 27-acre, $18 million fire-training complex that insiders only
half-jokingly refer to as the "Disneyland offue training facilities." In
much the same way Disney raised the bar for entertainment parks, the
TCC Fire Service Training Center may change the look and reach of
fue training for all time.
The 'Disneyland of Fire Training Facilities'
TCC's training center includes a six-story building for training
high-rise fIre fighting; a one-story complex simulating a three-store
strip shopping center; a two-story structure reflecting a hotel or
apartment environment; and a separate row of simulated houses that
have alleys, fences, landscaping, and straddle a simulated city street.
The complex also includes a manmade channel used to train
firefIghters and police officers in swift-water rescue, a pad for fuel-
spill training exercises, and a system of trenches where rescue workers
will practice rescues necessitated by broken gas lines or trench
collapses.
Rounding out the complex are a simulated flrc station, two
partially enclosed outdoor classroom buildings, and a three-story
administration/classroom building from which computers control the
intensity of fires and reaction of the flame as the extinguishment agent
is applied. The administration building also includes space for regular
campus classes and meetings.
It's the integration of all these elements into a unified facility,
one greater that the sum of its parts, that is really successful at TCC,
. said Todd Tovani, the design architect with BJSS Duarte Bryant.
Impressively ambitious, TCC's training center actually began
in the late 1990s as a modest 40,000 square foot addition to the
school's police academy. That plan began to grow dramatically,
however, when college officials began to realize how far the nation
had fallen behind in fIre training.
)
I
)
I
"The project went through three stages of growth," said Carl
Pringle, director of facilities for TCC. "Before we were fInished, our
project went to $18 million. But that shows the extent of the need. For
example, fuefighters here who want to practice swift-water rescue
used to have to rent time at the water amusement park in Arlington.
As we discovered how large the needs were, the budget grew
accordingly. Our trustees also became increasingly excited about the
role we could play in fIlling a huge public safety gap."
TCC met the funding challenges by implementing a novel
approach, one that allowed the college to fund the project through
maintenance tax revenue rather than general obligation bonds.
As the design team began to take shape, TCC contracted with
PBS&J, a national engineering and environmental consulting fInn, to '
provide civil engineering, landscaping and surveying services.
Architect of record for the team was PBK Architects of Dallas and the
design architect was BJSS Duarte Bryant of Olympia, Wash. It also
entered into a construction management-at-risk agreement with
Charter Builders, Ltc. of Dallas. As part of the cm-at-risk partnership,
Charter was responsibilities for managing the construction process as
well as cost control.
)
Many Systems, Many Challenges
In terms of scope and use of technology, few if any training
centers come close to matching TCC's. For civil engineers, the project
required acute planning to assure the water, fire and structural systems
would work efficiently. Moreover, TCC's fire training center has the
singular mission of simulating danger at every corner. Although it may
be a controlled environment, the training center's fires, swift-water
and trenches are very real. For engineers, then, there was little room
for error. TCC began construction of its training center in August of
2001. Slightly northeast and contiguous to the main campus, the
training complex is built on terrain that rises from 710 to 758 feet
above sea level. Instead of leveling the land, planners saved the natural
contour so trainees can experience what it's like flghting fires and
parking fire trucks on uneven terrain, Tovani said.
.Excavation was a bit challenging because of the lack of
topsoil. In most areas, rock was found only six inches below the
surface, although the limestone strata were not uniform. However, the
rock could be ripped instead of blasted. By the time the complex
opened, about 60,000 cubic yards of material had been cut and 45,000
cubic yards of material had been filled. Lime stabilization was not
required. 'Where the sub-grade was in rock, crushed limestone or
"chat" was used to fill the voids from the excavation operation.
Site work also included construction of two ponds at the base
of the complex. Because of environmental and economic concerns, the
training center recycles the water it uses. Initially, water was pumped
into the two ponds from nearby Marine Creek Lake, establishing the
ponds as a recyclable source of water for the training complex. Storm
water and extinguishment agent runoff is collected in the storm sewer
system and piped to the upper and lower ponds. Water is pumped
throughout the training area via 8-inch and 1O-inch pipes.
'}
Designed as the premier fire-training center in America, TCe's
complex is expected to rcceive extcnsive usc. By design, it allows
several training activitics to be conducted simultaneously. To extend
the life of the training buildings, the team selected exterior eMU
concrete brick, which is best able to withstand extreme temperatures.
On the inside, Pagenite wall panels further reduce heat forced on the
structural components.
Fuel for the Fire
At the various training sites, propane and natural gas are used
to fuel the fires. Because Dallas-Fort Worth has been designated by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) as a non-attainment area,
gasoline or wood-pallet fires, commonly used at training centers
elsewhere, were not an option for TCe.
Propane is used for the exterior fires and for the fuel spill fires
because of its high expansion ratio going from liquid to vapor. Natural
gas was available at the site and was used for the interior fires. The
computer-controlled systems create a safe, realistic, reliable and
repeatable fire training experience. The live-fue training system was
designed by Symtron Systems Inc. of Fair Lawn, N.J., the 20-year
leader in the field. Although the smoke and flames are truly realistic,
they are environmentally inert, said Terry L. Haymond, director of
facilities development for Symtron Systems. If a firefighter encounters
difficulty, the system is equipped with emergency shut-off switches,
both in the control tower and on the ground, which will immediately
tum off the fue.
Train for any Emergency
Along with fue and swift-water training, the TCC project
offers confined-space training. On the west side of the complex is a
network of concrete trenches eight feet deep. In the trenches, rescue
workers can practice various rescue techniques, including storm-
sewer searches that require fuefighters to navigate their way through
24 and 30-inch ADS pipes. In the trench used to simulate gas-line and
waterline breaks, the sound of hissing gas is evident. By opening a
valve, the trench quickly fills with water. During some exercises,
simulated earth is loaded behind two six-foot tall sluice gates. When
the gates are opened firefighters experience the sensation and hazards
of a collapsing trench.
Near the confined space training area, rescue workers also
have an opportunity to practice fuel-fire response. On a 20 by 20-foot
concrete pad, liquid propane burners can create flames 40 to 50 feet
high. The fuel spill is adjacent to a railroad track complete with rail
cars on their sides. The track and rail cars were donated and installed
by Burlington Northern Sante Fe. In the future, a railroad tunnel will
be added to allow training in the rescue of a subway emergency.
Remote Sensing and Control
The various propane/natural gas systems are controlled by a
dedicated computer in the administration building computer room.
The computer continuously performs checks on the equipment to
ensure correct operation. In the event of an unsafe condition or
emergency, the computer immediately aborts the training scenario.
Flames are automatically extinguished, but smoke is evacuated and
interior temperatures are reduced.
j
)
The Symtron Systems life-fue training network includes
sensors in each building. They can be activated remotely from the
control center, where the intensity of the fue can be regulated. In fact,
sensors allow practically every aspect of the training exercises to be
controlled from the control room, including lights, water, gates, and
thermo-imaging cameras. The sensors even make it possible to print
readouts of how much time was required to extinguish fues.
Fast-Track Construction
Despite its complexity, TCC's training center was designed as
a fast-track project with only a 12-month schedule. Thanks to
reasonably good weather and acute coordination, the project moved
forward quick! y.
Despite an $18 million outlay, TCC should be able to recoup
its initial $18 million investment in about 10 years, college officials
said. The college will market the center not only to Texas fire and
police departments, but public safety departments across the nation.
There's little doubt the need is there.
I
I
"Across the nation we are seeing fewer fires, but because of
petrochemicals and lightweight materials, the fires are hotter and more
dangerous," Abercrombie emphasized. "At the same time that higher
skills are required, training centers have basically disappeared because
of environmental concerns. Consequently, we're going to cover as
many bases as possible here and also allow for future growth by
adding extra conduit. In terms of technology, I'm not aware of any
center coming remotely close to what we offer. Our instructors even
have pocket controllers that allow them to start and stop fues in the
training buildings where they're teaching.
"Because this project involves so many nuances, coordination
was one of our leading challenges. But it has come together very well,
and amazingly fast," Abercrombie added. "We at TCC are
exceedingl y proud of what we can offer the nation's public safety
professionals. There hasn't been anything like this, and therefore
there's been a tremendous void. We think we've gone a long way
toward filling that void. I believe lives are going to be saved because
of this project."
#
(John Blacker is a program manager with PBS&J, one of the
nation's leading engineering and consulting fums. Blacker can be
reached at 972-380-2605. You may view the company's web site at
www.pbsj.com.)
#
Tarrant County College
Fire Service Training Center
RICHARD M. FLYNN FIRE TRAINING FACILITY
"'~'(:Iji
_":~"...,,l,',, ,
. ;;~,;, .
..: l\~
,"-'"
"-"-',,-
,:?~,:]~:~ .
')
The existing Richard M. Flynn Fire Academy
consists of a bum building, an administration
building, dormitory and other outdoor training
props. The only training element that was
missing was the large scale fuel spill bum area,
necessary to allow fire service personnel serving
Index E airports to maintain their certification per
the FAR 139 training requirement. On 10 acres,
adjacent to the existing Fire Academy and a
pristine river, an ARFF Training Facility was
designed to enhance the training experience
and to fit in with nature.
The Richard M. Flynn ARFF Training Facility
consists of a computer-controlled, propane-
fueled, 125-foot-diameter fuel spill bum area,
vehicle maneuvering area, control tower with
safety briefing classroom, propane distribution
system, and a Specialized Aircraft Fires Trainer
(SAFT). The SAFT consists of a mockup
containing the following fireplaces: a cockpit
fireplace, a cabin fireplace with both port and
starboard side fires and a fiashover, a cargo
area fireplace, an APU fire, a baggage
compartment fire, an electronics bay fire, a
wheel brake fire, and tail and wing engine
fireplaces with both running and non-running
scenarios.
Location: Richard M. Flynn Fire Academy,
Concord, New Hampshire
Client: State of New Hampshire, NHDOT
Division of Aeronautics
Status: Operational
Date of Completion: 2/02
Approximate Cost: $7,000,000
Approximate Fee: $500,000
Reference: Rick Mason, Director, 603-271-6099
Tricia Lambert, NHDOT, 603-271-1674
PHILADELPHIA INT'L AIRPORT ARFF TRAINING FACILITY
)
)
)
u
,
In order to meet the training needs of the
Philadelphia International Airport and
\1" surrounding area, the City of Philadelphia
, contracted with the PBS&J Team to design a
state of the art, ARFF Training Facility located
on 10 acres on Airport property. The Training
Facility will consist of a computer-controlled,
propane-fueled, 125-foot-diameter fuel spill burn
area, vehicle maneuvering area, control tower
with safety briefing classroom, propane
distribution system, and a Specialized Aircraft
Fires Trainer. The facility is located in a remote
corner of the Airport, adjacent to an FAA radar
facility and a tidewater drainage ditch. While
being located on Airport property inside the
AOA, the facility is actually located in Tinicum
Township. Permitting and plan review
coordination was critical. Due to City of
" Philadelphia requirements, the project was bid in
four separate contracts: General, Electrical,
Mechanical, and Plumbing.
Location: Phiiadeiphia internationai Airport
Client: City of Philadelphia
Status: Under Construction
Date of Completion: 3/02
Approximate Cost: $7,000,000
Approximate Fee: $500,000
Reference: Mark Coval, Project Manager, 215-
937-6728
Isbell Engineering Group
Structural Engineering Consultant
.I
!
"Integrity in Engineering"
CONSULTANTS IN
ENGINEERING &
PLANNING
fiRM PROFILE
OUR MOTTO
"Integrity in Engineering"
We ore committed to helping
you achieve 011 of your project
goals, including budgets and
deadlines.
This means we will do our best
to be accessible at all times,
undivided in assisting you,
honest, practical. hard working,
and looking out for you.
I.
Isbell Engineering Group, Inc.
1405 W. Chapman Dr. #200
Sanger. Texas 76266
940-458-7503
940.458-7417 fax
isbell@isbellengineering.com
......_~"'..,,..,.a!l
-
COMPANY BACKGROUND:
Isbell Engineering Group, Inc, is a multi-disciplined professional firm
specializing in structurol and Civil Engineering, Geotechnical and
Construction Material Tesfing services established in 1977 by David
K, Isbell. P,E. The office is located in Sanger, Texas and has ex-
panded fo a current staff of over 30 professionals. and currently is
regisfered to practice Engineering in over 37 sfates.
SERVICES PROVIDED:
Structural Engineering
Commercial
Residential
Industrial
Institutional
Forensics
Geotechnical Engineering
Geotechnical Investigations
Civil Engineering
land Deve!opment
Surveying
Plafting
Master Planning
Urban Planning
Landscape Design
Construction Materials Testing
Pier Inspections
Concrete Placement Observation and Testing
Soil Densifies, site work, utility trenches, etc.
Aggregates
Reinforcing Steel
Structural Steel
Masonry
Mortars/Groufs
Concrete Cylinder Testing
Full Service Soils Laboratory
Industrial/Warehouse Building Design
Architectural Engineering
Site Layouf
Design/Build
.-.,.
"""""~" -
-
,~ ~
I
i1f
4
"Integrity in Engineering"
CONSULTANTS IN
ENGINEERING &
PLANNING
PERSONNEL
Isbell Engineering Group, Inc.
1405 W. Chapman Dr. #200
Sanger, Texas 76266
940-458-7503
940-458.7417 Fax
isbell@isbellengineering.com
L. "'~''''-h'......_."......_
DA VID K. ISBELl. P.E.
President, CEO, Structural Division Manager
David Isbell hos a Bachelor's and Master's Degree in Civil Engineering
with a concentration in Structures, In 1977. David began offering
consulting services and the firm Df Isbell Engineering, Inc. wos created.
Since then Dver 2,000 prDjects have been completed by the firm
ranging from residential additlDns tD large industrial plants. SChDDls
and industrial facilities have been especially numerous, but Dovid has
extensive experience in all types of building materiols.
Professional AffiliatiDns
Member, American Society Df Civil Engineers
Member, American Concrete Institute
Member, National Society Df Professional Engineers
Member, PTI
Community Affiliations
Elder, CrDss Timbers Church
Member, Melodrama Actors of Mt. Springs
Professional Licenses
Licensed PrDfessional Engineer
Licensed ProfessiDnal Surveyor in Texas
Education
High School- W.T. White, Dallas, Texas, May 1966
CDllege - BS in Civil Engineering The University of
Texas at Austin 1970
Mosters Df Engineering The University DfTexos at
Austin 1973
STATE REGISTRATIONS
STATE
AIDbama
Arizona
Arka nsas
California
Calorado
Flanda
Georgia
Idaha
IIlinais
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
CERTlFICA TE #
13544
25586
5013
30127
17315
33838
14522
4861
92833
20636
10388
8264
12642
21076
17430
35760
30413
16480
STATE
Mississippi
Missouri
Nebraska
New Mexico
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
.,.."""'........"".=
~~~-~.~,,"'.,
CERTIFICA TE #
9104
21153
5605
8652
11790
3451
48429
10894
12416
PE 042050 R
7651
3922
16582
37838
14655
2204
11341
22753
6169
.""'"',"'-
!
"Integrity in Engineering"
CONSULTANTS IN
ENGINEERING 8.
PLANNING
Related Experience
Isbell Engineering Group, Inc.
1405 W. Chapman Dr. #200
Songer. Texas 76266
940.458-7503
940.458-7417 Fax
isbe.lI@isbellengineering.com
"'.
"".,,~",.-
GOVERNMENT FACII.Il1ES
Comanche County Jan. Lowion. OK
Grayson County Jusice Center. Sherman. 1X
Van Alstyne Jusice of ihe Peace Center. Van Alstyne.1X
Denton County Commmonm Court New Gavemment Center. 1l1e
Cobny. Texas
Denton County Carrdl Courts BUDding. Denton. Texas
Compus ll1eotre RenovaTIon. Denton. Texas
East Gallery Addition and Renovaiion. Greater Denton Arts Counci.
Denton. Texas
City of Denton:
CMC Center Toilet Focllities
CMC Center Pod
Service Center
CityHd
VlSUal Arts Center
Denia Recreation Center
Denton Are StaTIon
Denton Central lire Station
Lewisvile Ffe StaTIon # 1. Lev-.isvlle.1X
Lewisvile lire Station #2. LeMsvile.1X
Bedforc:J.Cdleyvile Ffe Station. Bedford.1X
North Richland H,~ lire Station. North Richland Hi~.1X
Rower Mound lire StaTIon #3. Rower Mound 1X
Harker Heights Fire StaTIon, Harker Heights, 1X
Bedford Fire Station, Bedford, 1X
Sherman Ffe Station, Sherman.1X
Lake Cities lire Staiion, Lake Dallas, 1X
Texarkana lireStaiion North Fire Station, Texarkana, 1X
Piano Ffe StaTIon #3 & #4, PIano, 1X
City of CarroUton Fire StaTIon. Carrdlton. 1X
Cooper Road Ffe Station, Texarkano, AR
Ardmore Ffe Station #3, Ardmore, OK
Ardmore Ffe Station, Ardmore, OK
Ardmore Ffe StaTIon, Ardmore, OK
Carrollton lire StaTIon # 1. Carrollton, 1X
Carrollton Fire Staiion #2 Ca~ollton, 1X
~
~
L
-
Dole W. Coffey Consulting Engineers
MEP Engineering Consultant
,
D alc W. Caffe)' Consulting Engineers, Inc. is a multi-disciplined electrical and mechanical
engincering firm with a vast amount of expcrience in the design of electricaVmcchanical
systems for all types offacilities, buildings, and industrial/manufacturing systcms. DWCCE was
established by its foundet, Dale W. Caffey, more than twenty years ago and currently serves
satisfied clients throughout Texas as well as nationwide.
Mechanical and electrical consulting engineering services include:
. Electrical Distribution & Controls
. Lighting
. Extcrior and Landscape Lighting
. Air Conditioning, Heating, and Ventilation
. Sitc Utility Systems
. Plumbing
. Fire Alarm Systems
. Fire Sprinkler Systems
. Industrial Proccss Design
. Construction Administration
. Energy Management/Sustainable Buildings
. Environmental Issues
. Facility Surveys
. Building Systems Evaluations
. Enginecring Project Management
The broad range ofDWCCE's engineering services are directed toward computer centers, industry,
distribution centers, manufacturing, medical facilities, schools/universities, churches, sports
facilities, restaurants, retail, all levels of government, auditoriums/theaters, and commercial owners.
Firm and personnel project experience includes new construction, additions, and renovations.
DALE W. CAFFEY
is a Registered Professional Enginccr with a Bachelor of Sciencc Deb'1'ee in Electrical Engineering.
Dale Caffey worked as an elcctrician at Tyler Pipe & Foundry Company while attcnding collegc
and held a Masters Electrician License. His engineering career began as a plant cngincer for
Aluminum Company of lunerica in Rockdale, Texas after graduating from Texas A & M
Universiry,
In 1972, Dale Caffey joined the Dallas consulting fInn of Alan H. Smith Consulting Engineers,
Inc. and eventually elevated to the position of Senior Vice-President and second majority
stockholder. In 1982, he created the consuliing fIrm of Caffey Enginccring Company and operatcd
in that capacity until teaming with a partner to form Caffey/Sayers Consulting Engineers, Inc. In
1991, he founded his prcsent fInn, Dale W. Caffey Consulting Engineers, Inc (DWCCE).
He has many years experience in the design of electrical distribution and controls for commercial,
industrial, and institutional buildings. More detailed experience includes electrical distribution,
energy studics and evaluations, lighting design, industrial process systems, emergency power sys-
tems, and high voltage systems.
)
J
Dale Caffey presently functions as the CEO ofDWCCE with involvement in engineerillg dcsign,
design production, and facility evaluations.
EDUCATION: Texas A & M University
B.S. Electrical Engineering
Graduated 1969
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING REGISTRATION (NCEES) :
Arizona Florida Louisiana North Carolina Texas
.I\rkansas illinois Massachusetts Oklahoma Utah
California Iowa Michigan Orcgon Virginia
Colorado Kansas Missouri Pennsylvania Washington
Kentucky New Mexico Tennessee Wisconsin
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
TSPE (Texas Society ofprofessional Engineers)
NSPE (National Society of Professional Engineers)
American Consulting Engineers Council
Consulting Engineers Council of Texas
NCEE (National Counsel Engineering Examiners)
Dale W. Caffey Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Personnel
)
REPRESENTATIVE MUNICIPAL PROJECTS
Denton Main Fire Station
Denton, Texas
Construction Completed: 2002
Architect: Kirkpatrick Architectural Studio - Denton, Texas
Fire Station Nos. 3, 5, and 7
Wichita Falls, Texas
Construction Completed: 2001
Architect: Staley Architects - Wichita Falls, Texas
Fire Station NO.1
Grand Prairie, Texas
Construction Completed: 2000
Architect: McCaslin Cowden Architects
Allen Senior Citizens Recreational Facility
Allen, Texas
Construction in Progress
Architect: Pro$Fonna Architects - Dallas, Texas
Allen Library and Civic Auditorium
Allen, Texas
Construction Completed: 2004
Architect: Pro$Fonna Architects - Dallas, Texas
Thurgood Marshall Recreation Center Renovation
Dallas, Texas
Construction Completed: 2003
Architect: Johnson McKibben Architects - Dallas, Texas
Arlington Police Training Center
Arlington, Texas
Construction Completed: 2004
Architect: ARB Architects - Dallas, Texas
Greenville Recreation Center
Greenville, Texas
Construction Completed: 2003
Architect: Cummings & Associates Architects - Greenville, Texas
Dale W. Caffey Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Related Project Experience
-I
Spinnaker Technology Group
Information Technology Consultant
)
'J
~ R,{~,~0,~fc[
)
)
)
I
At Spinnaker Technology Gronp, we are your computer
networking and infrastructure experts. We understand that
your computer network is the foundation on which you run your
business. That's why we build reliable, rock-solid,
high-performance computer networks that meet your needs
today, while allowing you growth for the future.
Our scrvices and solutions include:
Network Design & Implcmentation
Spinnaker Technology Group's team of experienced and knowl-
edgeable professionals can you help design and implement your
computer network. We tap into our years of practical experience
to put together a network design that meets your requirements, and
then we implement your computer network according to a project
plan based on industry best practices.
Network Maintenance & Support
After your network is up and running, you want to keep it that way.
Spinnaker Technology Group has a wide variety of maintenance
and support progra.'11s that keep your network running srftoothly.
Product Procurement
Buying technology solutions is still tough to do, even in today's
world of on-line and mail-order stores. They have low prices, but
do they really know your needs? Spinnaker technology Group can
help you procure all of your technology products in a manner that
meets your goals and objectives.
Office Information:
Firm Name:
Type of Firm:
Year Founded:
Address:
Spinnaker Technology Group
Limited Partnership
2001
I J 036 South Hunter Hill Lane
Argyle, TX 76226
(940) 368-8171
(940) 464-0366
bruce@spinnakertg.com
Bruce Mitchell
www.spinnakertg.com
Telephone:
Fax:
Email:
Person to Contact:
Website:
~ P,,'{~'~~O~~~
BRUCE M. MITCHELL, LEAD CONSULTANT / OWNER
QUALIFICATIONS
. Planning, Organizing, Directing Activities and Projects.
. Establishing Standards, Setting Priorities and Meeting Deadlines.
. Handling a Variety of Tasks and Responsibilities Simultaneously
and Efficiently.
WORK EXPERIENCE
SPINNAKER TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LP
Argyle, TX July 2001 - Present
. Built a Tecnology Consulting Firm
. Provide ongoing design, implementation and support to over 30
clients
. Manage day-to-day operations and long-term strategic direction
for many on our clients
NTCS, Inc.
Denton, Texas
President
May 1992 - July 2001
. Oversee sales, accounting, customer service, and strategic
direction of company
. Perform sales functions primarily focused toward independent
banks
Work Experience prior to May 1992 was in Financial Analysis and
Network Data Analysis
EDUCATION
TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY
Spring 1992 - Fall 1999
Completed a Masters in Business Administration.
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS
Spring 1990 - Fall 1991
Completed undergraduate business course work in preparation for
an MEA program
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA
May 1986
BA in Journalism
Concentration in Business & Communications
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF HEALTH CARE EXECUTIVES
STUDENT ASSOCIATE MEMBER January 1992 - Present
AJ R,,{~,~0o~fcf
Client:
DENTON INDEPENDI,NT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Project Budget: $2,000,000
Project Overview: Designed and managed the implementation
of wide area network to service the Denlon Independent School
District's 14,000+ users.
Involved in aspects of this project from design to implementation,
from presenting ideas and plans to the School Board to coordinat-
ing laying of Fiber Optic cable by the City of Denton, from design-
ing data centers to working hand in hand with general Contractors.
Prom a technical standpoint, the nctwork was based on a fiber
optic backbone that was coordinated and installed by the City of
Denton. The backbone was designed using multiple redundant
rings to ensure that tbe network would remain up in the case of
multiple failures in the integrity of the backbone. The electronics
were based on a Cisco switched platform. Tbe server equipment
is all based centrally in a Data Center. Since the initial design and
implementation the District has been able to build on their invest-
ment by adding full motion video and all internal telephony ser-
vices to the network,
-I
Estimating Methodology
Computerized Estimating Scrvices (CES) wilJ meet with Arhitect and their design team
to review the scope of work for each discipline at each of the three major design stages
including Schematic Design, Dcsign Devclopment and 95% Construction Documents.
CES wilJ visit the proposed site after the illitial design meeting and before beginning the
Schematic Design Estimate (taking digital pictures). During this site visit CES will make
notes of any special needs such as power, utilities, grading, storm drainage, traffic flow
and signs of any existing above and below the grade structures that may need to be
removed. These conditions will be researched with the design team and reflected in the
estimate.
The estimates will be in the CSI format at each of the three different design stages of the
project using Microsoft's Excel spreadsheet The estimates include the summary sheet,
exclusions and clarifications, three-page itemized list of general conditions and the
associated pricing sheets. These estimates will be emailed as a draft copy to the Arhitect
for review. Any mutually-agreed changes to the estimate will be made as the final
estimate for each design stage and re-emailed to the Architect's office for distribution.
During the course of the estimating procedures, any questions of the scope of work will
be emailed'to t.he Arcpitecfs office as the single source of responsibility. The responses
to the questions from the design team will be incorporated into the estimate.
The pricing used in the estimate will reflect the local and current market conditions, The
pricing will not carry any hidden contingencies. The estimate will have a separate
exposed line for design contingency on the summary sheet The amount of the design
contingency will reduce as the project progresses to completion. The summary sheets
after the initial Schematic Design Estimate will have two additional separate columns
entitled Previous Estimate and the second column entitled Difference so the changes in
the estimate can be tracked.
CES will work together as a part of the design team to bring the project to a successful
completion.
'i
Gregory D. Blanchard
2823 VZ CR 1222
Grand Saline, Texas 75140
903-962-5643
Email: cescostest@msn.com
1967 - 1970
. 1986 - Present
1984 -1986
1982 - 1984
RESUME
Education
Bachelor of Science in Construction Technology
Associated Degree in Architecture
Purdue University
Dean Distinctive List
Work Exoerience
Computerized Estimating Services (CES)
Grand Saline, Texas
Owner - Vice President
Business developer, manager, estimating, scheduler
for private and public commercial ground-up and
renovation projects from the schematic to the
construction documents throughout the United
States working directly with the architects and
owners.
George A. Fuller Construction of Texas
Dallas, Texas
Chief Estimator
Hard bidding and negotiating commercial private
and public projects ranging from $3.0 to $30.0
million dollars in the Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas.
Kitchell Construction of Texas
Dallas, Texas
Chief Estimator
Hard bidding and negotiated commercial private
projects primarily hospitals ranging from $2.0 to
$20.0 million dollars in the Texas.
Resume - Gregory D. Blanchard
1979 - 1982
Bovis Lend Lease (formerly US Lend Lease)
Dallas, Texas .,
Chief Estimator - Project Manager
Estimating and managing design built and
negotiating commercial private and development
projects ranging from $2.0 to $15.0 million dollars
throughout the United States.
1977 - 1979
CM (Construction Management) affiliated with
CRSS Architectural Firm
Houston, Texas
Chief Structural Civil Estimator
Estimating private, public, military and government
projects throughout the world from the schematic to
the construction documents ranging from $10.0
million to $33.3 billion dollars.
1975 - 1977
Manhattan Construction Company
Houston, Texas
Senior Estimate
J
Estimating hard bidding public and private
commercial projects ranging from $10.0 to $25.0
million dollars throughout Texas.
1973 - 1975
Blount Brothers Construction Company
Houston, Texas
Estimator
Estimating hard bidding public and private
commercial projects ranging from $10.0 to $25.0
million dollars throughout Texas.
1970 - 1973
Beloit Component Inc.
South Beloit, lllinois
Estimator - Draftsman - Engineer
Estimating, draftsman and engineer for
prefabricated modular residential and commercial
wood framing and wood truss projects in
Wisconsin, Illinois and Indiana.
Sample Estimate
Em:lo5t!dArea
F'f':.l F ~CGr
3<!":cnc =:;}-:;:
Bldg Ar~J
3: C52
c6':::'
C"",0126
~,~ ~.- ~ sl
A;ler~,,",:;" .'10 ,
.,'" ~"'(; :;:
hirkp<ltrick Ar~hllectUle Studio
~~C -,.... ,~,.I:""_-!
[en.;;:;" l"lc$ -;2::
CES - Computerized Estirnating Serv.<.:~,;
2,,:3 II:: ::P .::~=
G~,",""~ ::;,jj,f'e, T~j3S 75'':;:
SJ-3-'F-3;e:,
:;'-,0." :'<;i"-il'",-~
SC3-:!<:-::.5C--1;
Gr...... :;:cn;(';JIC
J
)
. .'-~ .. .-
JNO! Des/(~n Development Total I "" ! %ot Site I BUlldln\l Pr~vlou$ DtI"Ierence
I Estimate Cost Tot;]1 Cost Cost Eslirnat~
I , --:,,!"":e':ll'-"~CI:'O::S - 15 mor:tns J5~ ::...j2i "5: JJa'% ,t;,:-GOI j8~ ;6el JSJ-jr;" <lC:
2 I A::1"ie :!cWCI(':" ::l~'''11 i'ee I ..b3..J5 0";-1 035% 7 seO. 3C 3..::: 45,'l45 U
3 I .C:;c.'l::: - e~s 1 3LC.::CC }:;.;j ~ ~(jo,. 3COCCO n;:1\C }CC~CG
, I ~st'r:- 3- 'n~ce::t;:;r:. A.,lc"'2~::=- 3~ :CG :J3€ C '-;-~i. ~5~C01 :'::CGC 35XQ C
I 5 I 5<;lec;"e S,te :;E-~c!;;;~;", , '00 00' o ;:)~~'. , 'ee 0 :,13-:: 0
i , .',:ass"'xcavatlcn I ~-:(") .:30 :..7i , d ,~, ?JC <l:;C 0 2~9 :);:'5 ~G,~35
I Soil St"t::n~a,:c.I1 "" 1'3: ~J 5" 0-.1:% 55 liE 0 :;32-.14 -L.3J.B
, I T erl1''.lle C::.nlrc~ 109<:2 0" aCE'%. 1(, 9~:? 10_7\8 2~d
, Sde ~liILL~;es 15.~ :::35 li54 , ~::~~ 159\]35 0' 15-] 155 5,0:50
10 S~or~, CrClll'ilce 1':<101],1 1GB o 3C'Y. 'GJ '~]<l1 oi Sc.d10 <le_104
" L3nCSC3~lfl(' &. ;1fIQaliCn 16~.3C': I ~ 07 , 24% 151 ")41 01 112567 45337
121 ::'Cl"'Cln(] , ,so 007 O~:.% 7 I:tO 0 614D 910
13 ;;>"'vf'f:'1l'nl ,'t.aT~w"~ :) -:-39 OC5 OG<1'!o 5;39 0 5576 :53
" 'lIe Ccnc~te 90~ 617 928 6:i1% 9:)',61, 0 S7/.3?O 2<1.197
I 15 5wllOln' CDJ,crele 1,028990 1059 7 BS% , .025,390 517.631 45~.35B
16 "';lason:'\! B:J ~ 2991 ~ '7 683% 3.~55 687,8<13 825,56& 6<:.73D
17 51rlJClural Slee! 713 OC-91 : 35 5<1,%1 91 Q?:; 52138.1 1 1<10775 -<:25,387
18 M!5....^ellar.eous Steel 7Cge7 073 054% 7815 63,172 7099.7 0
19 ROll ,l::ar::1er:,ry 135D15 139 , 03% 13.5_015 137 )72 -2.357
'" M:ill.vcr;; .5~975 :2, 388% 505975 332755 171:'10
21 '/"0 CD & Jc,r.t Sealants 16144 G17 0120;" 1O,:'C1 594<1 16,.40a -254
" Pref,r:lsnC'C ;:;'oofln &. $l;ee::.Jet3!S I 4:9_::52 4;3 35a% 479.552 45i' 17a -; 525
231 i;xr:,,::; & Sheel~eta;s <166891 G dEl o ]Eo,. 465891 51 565 -4,B75
24 ROOt.---'3!Cil 3125 GG3 002% 3125 3 ~25 0
25 Met31 COOlS ~ ;::rar."les - Mar,s ...OE 1 :::~:"~::l {J ':~I 0_':.1% 95 955 ::'2410 i3,545
2" WC'.oo Ceors - M.Jr!s FOB , .!O295 02: o 16"i. 2C.295 211.420 -4.\85
27 r-inlsh Hafowaroz - Mans :-C8 4;',3.45 0'9 036% <17345 35325 8.Cl20
2' Crs ~ m1S 3. riaroware - lacor 36,&e.9 0<0 030% 3BS€f< 35293 2575
" Special ~cors 3 ~5C 003 CD?% 3150 2.275 !l7S
'" Glass 8. G:azlI"I(] 2..:0000 247 1 ~% 240G6Q 240. C60 0
OJ 0 i:& ~CCL.-StlC31 442.487 4,55 3.3Eo% 44:'.457 437,483 .5-; 996
02 ~,leW~fks 172755 , 75 1.32% 172.755 idS 4!2 ?7.253
I " QuaTT"1 T.le 439CC ;]':5 034% 439CO :!3 360 2G.Y-C
"" C;:!rpe! &. ReSIlient , 507J521 523 339% 50T 762 159500 339 I",
" . Wee'" .::Iocnnq J9.J~ 1 0:-0 D3e7'o 49,D11 45_220 3791
36 ;:>a'nJlf1 SW.!lI&COltl"Pf1 , :233 '3~:' 240 , 79% eo'5 23:' 722 ;56",5, 77.~SO
J7 Cnalk 3. Tack::lOOros 65.34.<: 057 050% I 55344 43,968 21.376
'" '7ml€t Pann,ons & A.cceSSCrlE'S &';361 068 o 510/' 66.361 52100 4,183
39 l~lN€TS & ',,'ents 3.072 OU3 002% 3.072 3_072 0
40 Fla coles 3.,50 004 0.03% 3.750 0 3.750 0
" ~Cef'ltlllcallOl1 !Jev;ces 11.485 012 009% 11485 9.700 1,;85
42 BUTki\n~ ?Iaque 1.500 OC'2 001% 1.5CO , 500 C
4' LDckers 740 001 001% 740 '<0 0
44 i=lfe -xt1n I.:lshers 8. Catllnels 1_:!20 CO2 002% 2.220 2275 ,55
" Sta"e ::QulOmeni 1.aGO 002 001% , 8CO 15350 -~<I.050
" AudiO & \htJeo :: t:lt'lT'ent 4.200 004 003% 4200 3425 liS
47 ;:-ooc SefV1CE' EqUlomenl 26C.OOC '68 I 99', 260_OCC 260_ OOC 0
" A:r.lel:C E ulP~ent 4.6!2 005 004% 4,010 12,110 -7.500
4' Wincow T:eatmem 101.756 015 0 11% 14.756 15956 -1,200
50 Multi Ie Seall 20.COO 011 0.15% 20.000 2a_ceo 0
" PlumtJln 34 ~.555 '51 252% 341.555 356,~JO -14,875
51 FlfI~ ?rolec:lon 120.545 , " o 9:?''10 120,645 117 732 2.913
5) i-NAC 1 cmooc 1032 769% l.X3.000 93.4.000 69,000
" ::C:.s:tr,cal 9:;':.7D5 ";62 ? ,.,. , ....I,~.j\J a;,'u~ 135C_ ~84 s.: GGi
55 ;:Ire Aiarr"l -,1',375 ? 15 a as"l'. '" 375 115000 -3_6:5
55 Tecr,rQ; ./ S'iste:n ~15COO 221 I eS% 215_OCXJ 215.COO 0
SuclClal - 11 456115 11789 01 B2O~ 2161 "4 919<:.871 10.210.512 1,245603
5~', ::es';.Ir,Ccr.::rger.cy 5i:2.SC-5 539 <139~1o 1 ~3 0€2 458.744 B67,e94 .295,C88
Ge~er<lll:aoll\ty Ir.surarce- 66155 068 0:;1% 13C.s9 531CO 60931 5128
8L;:!cersRlsKIr.su:cmce- 24,190 025 019% <1_775 19415 22279 1.9~2
::: ::% Overl".e.3d & ~~ - 665560 556 , 1 ~ 0,1" 131 568 534992 G13 B69 52,671
SL;.~to\aj . 1"2.78.583Q 131 oa g.a01% 2523 70i 10:'62,1~3 '1.77S5C4 1,J~O.]::'6
Ger-eral Contra~tors Bond - 259552 267 I "" 5'.231 208321 2390<13 20.509
- -
~~$Ion C~IGoment ~stlrnale. 51J_C4:;. 383 513425 1DO OC%
2504.9]9 10.4704<14 12.014.547
S265C S107 75 fsf
1.030,835
C~uct Ajl~rr-<l!~ . No 1 -
IGtc:1 ,f\C~~dlr.g !r.e Ailern<.lles-
-1 5C379:' !)e,e12 C:assrocm EWing
511.24\,59;
Enc!osed 9uilding An:a
First Floor
Second Floor
Page 3 of 26
81,052
16,122
DUfiltion.
15 Months
65 Weeks
J
Description Qty Unit Labor Milrl Sob labor Mat'l Sob Total
Unit Uni1 Unit Price Price Price Price
Field AdministratiClf1
Project Managei' - 1/3 time 22 - 1,300 0 0 28,167 0 0 28,167
General Superintendent 65 wl<s 1.100 0 0 71,500 0 0 71,500
Assistant SU5p(lrintondent - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pro]ec~ Engineer 65 wks 1,000 0 0 65))00 0 0 65,000
Tim~keeper wi<$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Field Clark wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Secrelary wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zen. Full Time labo~ 130 wks 425 0 0 55,250 0 0 55,250
Field Ennineerinn
Field Engineer 26 wks 1,000 0 0 26,000 0 0 26,000
Party Chief wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chainman 26 wk$ 800 0 0 20,800 0 0 20,800
Rodman 26 wks 400 0 0 to,4oo 0 0 10,400
L9yaui & Batterboards 1 Is 200 150 0 200 150 0 350
Partition Layout Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Survey 1 Is 0 0 3.000 0 0 3,000 3,000
Closing Survey 1 Is 0 0 3,000 0 0 3,000 3,000
Subsl5tence
Personnel Faa Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
fl.1ovingCost 1$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Room 2. Board w\c; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Job Staff Travel 65 trips 0 16,00 0 0 1,040 0 1,040
Main OffiCf Travel 33 trips 0 '6.00 0 0 520 0 520
Temporary StructlJres
Fieid I ,dljt:lr 15 me 0 425 0 0 6,375 0 8,375
Arch/ONner Trailer me 0 0 0 0 0 0 O.
Move in & \lut expense 1 Is 300 200 0 300 200 0 5DO
Temporary Toilets {4ea) 15 me 0 320 0 0 4,800 0 4,800
Storage Shed 15 me 0 100 0 0 1.500 0 1,500
Toolroom Shed me 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saw Shed mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Construction Fence 1,000 If 0 1.85 0 0 1,B50 0 1,850
G.C. Job Sign ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Project Sign 1 ea 2DO 300 0 2DO 300 0 500 ,
Temporary Walks! S1e.ps 1 1$ 125 125 0 125 125 0 250
Covered Walks If 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ladders ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barricades 1 Is 300 250 0 300 250 0 550
Temporary Roof 1$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Partitions If 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dust Protection Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Ro,ads/?alking
Temporary Roads s' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Road & Sidawalks Repairs Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emp1o~ Parking s' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lol Rental Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sidewalks Rental Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Street Rental Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Safety
Safety Supervisor Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Watchman wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Security Service wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Flagman wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Police wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
First Aid Equipment 1 Is 0 300 0 0 300 0 300
Fire Safety Equipment 1 Is 0 475 0 0 475 0 475
Protect Floor Openings If 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PClimcter Prolection If 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9717-1 sf
_\
Pngc 4 of 26
DC"...c;iption Qty i Unit Labor Maf'1 Sub labor Mat'I Sub Total
Unit Unit Unit Prico Price Pnco Price
T empor3ry Electrical T
Elcctncal SerJlce Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Construciiofl Power 15 me 0 150 0 0 2,25-J 0 2.250
Drop Chords If 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stan-up Power b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Filters " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Generators " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T f!mp0r3.r'j W3ler
City Connection " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ConstructIOn Water 15 me 0 100 0 0 1,500 0 1.500
Water H05es , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Water Meler " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Gas
City Connection " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Huting Building 2 me 0 100 0 0 200 0 200
Space Heaters 1 oa 0 625 0 0 625 0 625
Operator wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Sarvices
J IInitor SOIVico wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CPM SchadulinQ e. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Documentation Photos Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Progress Photos 15 me 0 80 0 0 1,200 0 1,200
lee & Cups wk> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
lee Machine Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Water Boy wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I/'Jeathor Protection
Winter ProtectIOn Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pumps ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Operator wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Communicatioos
Telephone lines (3ea) 15 me 0 200 0 0 3,000 0 3,000
Install Telephone lines 1 Is 0 300 0 0 300 0 300
Hand Radios 3 "" 0 100 0 0 300 0 300
Fax/Paper me 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FreightITelegrams ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Corporala Computer Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Office Furniture & Supplies
Office Furniture per Trailer 1 '" 0 2,000 0 0 2.000 0 2,000
Office Machine 1 e' 0 1.500 0 0 1,500 0 1.500
Copy Machine & Paper 15 me 0 100 0 0 1,500 0 1,500
Office Supplies 15 me 0 75 0 0 1,125 0 1,125
Postal & Meter Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Petty Cash Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Blue Printing & E:<trn Plans 1 Is 0 2,500 0 0 2,500 0 2.500
General Clean-Up
Daily Cleaning wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Trash Chuto >> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dumpster 15 me 0 150 0 0 2,250 0 2,250
Trash Truck & Driver wks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dump Permits 33 I",d 0 25 0 0 813 0 813
Trash HaUl Service 33 load 0 300 0 0 9,750 0 9,750
Final Clean-Up
BUilding Area 97,174 sf 0.15 0 0 14,576 0 0 14,576
Garage Area sf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Toilet Rooms 25 .. 85 0 0 2,125 0 0 2,125
Erledor Glass 3,500 sf 0 0 0 700 0 0 700
Interior Glass sf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mirrors sf 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site Area 4 wi<> 300 0 0 1,200 0 0 1,200
Janitor Service I, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 5 of 26
OC$criprlon Oty I UM labo< Marl i Sob Laber I Marl Sob TOlal
Unit Unit Unit Pricc Price Price Prlee
Testing & Insoection I
Soil 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Asph,llt 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Concrele Design Mi:t 1 I, 0 500 0 0 500 0 SOO
Conelala " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Structural Steel Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
General Equipment
Pick-up Truck 15 mo 0 300 0 0 4,500 0 4,500
Auto 6 mo 0 475 0 0 2,B5() 0 2.850
Flat Bed Truck mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fork lift ; Cherry Picker mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oom mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade all mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dump Truck mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Front End Loader mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bachoe mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bolr-Cat mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Compactor mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TioIbl~Sa'''''' ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Radial Saw 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Skill Saw e, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Electric Dlill en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MillI.vorl( Equipment I, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Vibrator e' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Concrete Bucket o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Concrete Saw oa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wheel Bartow e. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LevGl - rent to the Job 15 mo 0 80 0 0 1,200 0 1,200
Transit. rent to the Job 15 mo 0 80 0 0 1,200 0 1.2:00
Air Compressor o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'N;;,ldlng Machine & Access., me 0 D D 0 0 0 0
Cutting Torch me 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Finishing Machine oa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scaffolding Is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Misc. SmaU Tools 15 mo 0 75 0 0 1,125 0 1,125
Minor R6p.airs 1 Is 0 500 0 0 500 0 500
Gas&Oi1 15 mn 0 100 0 0 1,500 0 ';500
296,843 62,073 6,000 354,915
30o"f, Fringe Benefits - 89,053 89,053
8,25% Sales Tax ~ exempt~ exempled
385,8.96
16,386
o
453,968
Say 453,968
30,265
permo
Ger:eral Ccnditicns . 15 menths
No. ltemefWork Diy Unit Unit Cost
Cost
Gener3i C()flditions (Reier to breakdown) 1 I, 453,968 453.968
-
453,968
2 ArlJylc Buildinq Permit Fee
1'0 ltemofWorl< Diy Unit Unit Cost
Cost
City 8ui\dinQ Permit- AlJo,^,-ance 1 " 45.845.00 45,845
45,845
3 Impact Fees
No ltemefWori( Diy Unit Unit Cost
Cost
lmoad Fees - Allowance 1 's 300,000 300,000
300,000
4 Tastinc & lr13pection - Allowance
No, !tern of Work Qty Unit Unit Cost
Cost
T estlna &. insoection - Allowance 1 ts 35,000.00 35,000
35,000
5 Soled.ive Site Demolition
J
No. Item of Work Qty Unit Unit Cost
Cost
Saw cut ~cratQ curbs 2 ea 30.00 60
Saw cut concrete pavem9nt 140 If 5,00 700
Remove concrete curbs 140 If 3.00 420
1.180
6 Mass Excavation
No, ltemofWorii: Qty Unit Unit Cost
Cost
Sjltfe!'lC(! 2,970 " 1.65 5,495
Hay bale curb inlet protection 11 ea 100.00 1.100
Construction entrance 1,250 sf 1.20 1.500
Clear & grub site 757,988 sf 0.016 12,128
Strip & stockpile topsoil + 30% swell 9,124 cy 2.25 20,529
Cut & fill site + or - 1/100 + 30% sWan 43,715 cy 2.85 124,586
Cut for pavement + or.l/1Qft+ 30% swell 3,979 cy 3.25 12,930
Retaining pond excavation 8,320 cy 3.25 27,040
l8in select fill under buildina + 30% swell 5,854 cv 6,00 35,123
240,430
Page 6 of 26
Principals
Associates
Technical Staff
Clerical Staff
S:\Our DocumcntslContracts\05\kirkpatrick exhibit codoc
EXHIBIT "c"
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES FOR
JAMES R. KIRKPATRICK, lNe. DBA
KIRKPATRICK ARCHITECTURE STUDIO
S 150 per hour
$110 per hour
$ 75 per hour
$ 65 per hour
~
::l
-0 "-
OJ '0
..r: ~ OJ
'"
U C ...
'"
V1 'E 0..
Q)
en > Iii 'u
c c ";:; OJ c ";:; '"
'" ~ c ;:
c 0 ~ Cl.. i:i: <(
c ";:; ~ '"
'" , , -- ~
'" u Z u u 0 0
0 c: ..'!! ";:; ";:; Q)
.... ~ '0 E ;: '" ;: '" ... "-
:.c OJ u '" E E '" ..r:
.... ~ Q) Q) E ...
:.c Vl '" 0> "S; Q) "S; Q) .C
'" ... 0 ..r: ..r: 'z:; 0
x ~ '" ~ Q) U Q) u La::E
w 0 Cl.. c:: V1 c:: V1