Loading...
2002-203O INANC NO. AN ORDINANCE APPOINTING MUNICIPAL JUDGE, ROBIN RAMSAY, AS ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE FOR DISCOVERY PURPOSES AND DELEGATING TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE THE AUTHORITY TO PREPARE DISCOVERY GUIDELINES IN THE PROCEEDING ENTITLED "TXU GAS DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT OF INTENT TO INCREASE RATES 1N THE NORTH TEXAS METROPLEX DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM"; PROVIDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE THE POWERS SET FORTH IN THE BODY OF THIS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, TXU Gas Distribution has filed several discovery requests in the form of Requests for Information in the proceeding entitled, "TXU Gas Distribution's Statement of Intent to Increase Rates in the North Texas Metroplex Distribution System"; and WHEREAS, the intervener, Spencer Station Generating Company, L.P. has asked the City to deny TXU's discovery requests to it and there is a need for the appointment of an administrative law judge to handle such discovery disputes and to recommend discovery guidelines in this proceeding; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That Murficipal Judge, Robin Ramsay, is hereby appointed Administrative Law Judge for discovery purposes in the proceeding entitled, "TXU Gas Distribution's Statement of Intent to Increase Rates in the North Texas Metroplex Distribution System." SECTION 2. That the Administrative Law Judge so appointed shall have the power to set hearings, receive evidence, and make final rulings in all discovery matters concerning this proceeding, to prepare and issue discovery guidelines generally consistent with procedural orders issued by the State Office of Administrative Hearings, to set discovery schedules for the parties, and is further delegated any and all other powers necessary to carry out these duties. SECTION 3. That the City Secretary is hereby directed to send copies of this ordinance to Autry Warren, Rates Manager, TXU Gas Distribution, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201- 3402 and G. Gail Watkins of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Field, 818 Congress Ave., Suite 1900, Austin, TX 78701 SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this the 02. MAYOR PRO ~ ATTEST: JENNIFER WALTERS, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: HERBERT L. PROUTY, CITY ATTORNEY Page 2 DISCOVERY GUIDELINES 1. Forms and Scope of Discovery · Scope--Discovery is permitted into any matter relevant to the subject matter of the proceeding, which is not privileged or exempted under the Texas Rules of Evidence, TRCP, or other law or role. · Stipulations--Discovery guidelines may be varied by the written agreement of the parties. o Limits on Discovery and Protective Orders Limits--The ALJ may, upon written notice to all parties, limit or amend the discovery guidelines for good cause. Protective Orders--A party shall seek a Protective Order from the ALJ in the event it intends to claim any information or material subject to discovery is confidential or proprietary. That party shall file a Proposed Protective Order or Agreement with the ALJ within five business days of making the first such claim. Parties have five days from that date to comment on the proposal. The Presiding Officer will issue a Protective Order based on those comments. 3. Requests for Information · Making Requests for Information (RFIs)--Discovery may include, but is not limited to, requests for information, data, electronic files or spreadsheets, materials, documents, tangible things, knowledge, impressions, opinions, admissions, inspections, or the production of documents or things. · Responding to RFIs--A party shall respond to all RFIs within 20 days of receipt of the RFI unless an objection is pending or has been granted. Each response must identify the preparer(s) and a sponsoring witness. Each RFI shall be answered separately. Documents need not be produced in response to an RFI if such documents are publicly available from local records. Responses shall be filed under oath unless the responding party stipulates in writing that RFIs can be treated by all parties as if the responses were filed under oath. · Objections-- Objections are due within 10 days of receipt of the RFI. The responding party shall negotiate in good faith concerning any discovery dispute. All grounds for not responding shall be stated in the objection. If an objection is based on privilege or exemption, the responding party shall, within two working days of the filing of such objection, provide a public index that provides, for each document, a full and complete description of the claimed privilege or exemption. · Motions to Compel--Motions to compel are due no later than 5 working days after the objection is received. Response to Motions to Compel shall be filed within 5 working days after receipt of the motion. · In Camera Inspection--In the event that a party objects to discovery based on a claim of privilege or exemption, that party must request an in camera inspection and provide the documents under seal for review to the ALL Such request along with related documents shall be filed within three working days of the receipt of the motion to compel. · Production of Voluminous Materials--If the response to a particular RFI consists of 100 pages or less, then the response is not volum'mons and shall be filed in full. If the response to a particular RFI exceeds 100 pages, then the response is voluminous and need not be filed. The responding party shall make available all volum'mous materials in response to RFIs at a location in Austin. If the requested voluminous materials exceed eight linear feet, then the party shall make the materials available where the materials are located. The party providing voluminous materials shall file with its RFI responses a detailed index of the voluminous materials responsive to a particular RFI. This index shall provide sufficient information to enable the party seeking discovery to identify the documents in that voluminous response with reasonable particularity. The index shall provide at a minimum the date, title, description, file number, preparer, and length for each document included in the volum'mons materials. · Duty to Supplement--A responding party is under a continuing duty to supplement its RFI responses as soon as that party acquires information that its prior responses are incorrect or incomplete. The responding party shall amend its prior responses within five working days of acquiring such information. 4. Sanctions · Causes for Imposition of Sanctions--Sanctions may be imposed by the ALJ for bad faith, failure to obey a lawful regulatory order, harassment, abuse, delay, or resisting the discovery process. · Types of Sanctions--Sanctions may include, but are not limited to, charging all or any part of the expenses of discovery against the offending party or its representative; holding that designated facts are admitted; striking pleadings; requiring the payment of reasonable expenses including attorney fees, incurred by other parties because of the sanctioned behavior; excluding evidence; or as determined by the ALJ. · Procedure--Motions for sanctions may be flied at any tune or may be initiated sua sponte by the ALJ. A hearing on the motion shall be held. Any sanction imposed by the ALJ shall be stayed to allow the party to appeal the imposition of the sanction to the City Council unless good cause exists for not granting the stay. 2