HomeMy WebLinkAbout041020 Friday Staff Report
City Manager’s Office
215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 (940) 349-8307
OUR CORE VALUES
Integrity Fiscal Responsibility Transparency Outstanding Customer Service
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 10, 2020
TO: The Honorable Mayor Watts and Council Members
FROM: Todd Hileman, City Manager
SUBJECT: Friday Staff Report
I. Council Schedule
A. Meetings
1. Cancelled - Public Utilities Board Meeting on Monday, April 13, 2020 at
9:00 a.m. in the City Council Work Session Room.
2. Cancelled - Historic Landmark Commission on Monday, April 13, 2020 at
5:30 p.m. in the City Council Work Session Room.
3. Cancelled – Library Board on Monday, April 13, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. at the
North Branch Library.
4. Cancelled - Mobility Committee Meeting on Tuesday, April 14, 2020 at
9:00 a.m. in the City Council Work Session Room.
5. Cancelled - Work Session of the City Council on Tuesday, April 14, 2020 at
2:00 p.m.
6. Cancelled - Agenda Committee Meeting Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at
2:30 p.m. in the City Manager’s Conference Room.
7. Cancelled - Health and Building Standards Commission Meeting on Thursday,
April 16, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
8. Cancelled - Committee on Persons with Disabilities on Thursday, April 16,
2020 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Work Session Room.
II. General Information & Status Update
A. Updated Information from Municipal Courts – During this period of court closure, a
person who has received a citation, including for parking, may request a reset until the
court reopens by emailing the court at dentonmunicipalcourt@cityofdenton.com.
Additionally, if the person does not wish to postpone the case, he or she may contact
the court and work with the court clerk’s office to pay a fine, submit documentation for
proof dismissals, sign up for driver’s safety or deferred adjudication. However, if a
person wishes to plead not guilty or come to court to discuss the case, the person would
need to request a reset because those require in court appearances. The Court is
processing requests received through the mail for paying a violation, requesting
Driving Safety or Deferred Disposition, or submitting any documents for a case.
Payment can also be made online. We are also responding to requests to extend due
dates or request a reset on a case through email. No warrants, penalties, or late fees
attached to cases during this time of closure will be issued. When court reopens, any
undisposed cases which were filed during the time of closure will be sent new notices
to appear. Staff contact: Tony Puente, DME
B. Conversation with Lenders – On Friday morning, City staff met with local banks and
lenders via a virtual meeting to discuss their experience and understand if there could
be an opportunity for bridge financing until resources are received through various
programs available. The conversation was very insightful and the following outlines
main takeaways.
For small business owners or current customers:
Generally, the banks shared that they are overwhelmed with handling and
processing applications for small businesses, but they are seeing some fairly
quick turnaround in some of the programs.
o For example, in the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), the average
turnaround time is generally 2-10 days from the time of the application
to get the PPP loans funded.
o A major challenge the banks had to overcome was that the SBA has
changed the loan application form three times and who qualifies
requirements twice.
There has been a gradual mindset shift in the small business owners as they
understand the PPP program, with many who had initially laid off or eliminated
jobs, bringing employees back on to receive the full reimbursement. If a small
business owner does not rehire all employees, they are eligible for a pro-rated
portion of the PPP loan.
The large majority of the PPP applications (if not all) have been approved by
the SBA; however, the one caveat is that those businesses with their paperwork
in order with the IRS, payroll, etc. have a distinct underwriting advantage in
terms of the time it takes to submit an application.
Most of the banks were not openly accepting non-customers for the PPP, as
they are working around the clock to process their current customers’ loan
requests to the SBA under the PPP and simply do not have the staff to approve
non-customers at this time.
The banks also reported that they are working with their customers for deferrals
and other options in order to provide financial relief for those directly impacted
from COVID-19 as well.
For individuals:
Individuals should not refuse to pay rent, loans, or mortgages; rather, the better
course of action is to proactively contact their landlords and mortgage
underwriters to establish a plan. In COVID-19 related instances, the landlords
2
do have the ability to also workout deals with their lenders. It should also be
noted that it cannot be assumed that all rent and loans were current before
COVID-19 started.
With the significant and unprecedented workload already on the banks and
various regulations regarding individual consumer loans, including
consideration of the ability to repay, it would not be feasible to coordinate
logistics and offer a broad program to individual consumers. Banks do not have
the ability to simply use a forthcoming unemployment benefit notification to
provide a bridge or cash flow. The individual circumstances of each consumer’s
ability to repay still remain.
As also shared in this Friday’s report, City staff has learned that the Texas
Workforce Commission (TWC) reports that unemployment benefits should be
made to approved applicants within two weeks of an approved application and
that payments will be backdated to the effective date of the claim so claimants
are no penalized for any delay in processing or application.
o Getting into the queue is still the main issue, but TWC reports that it
continues to take action to increase their capacity to respond to the
unprecedented volumes as described in the separate Friday report item.
The ability to assist individuals in being prepared to file for unemployment, to provide
guidance and expertise through legal or accounting professionals, or to assist and refer
individuals to other available resources in the community was a focus of the
conversation and supportive of the program that the City is developing with the United
Way (description provided in Friday Report in a separate item). Although extremely
difficult, COVID-19 has had unprecedented impacts to many systems, from banks to
unemployment agencies, that are struggling to respond and handle the sheer volumes.
City staff will continue to seek out ways to improve access for residents and businesses
to available resources.
C. Texas Workforce Commission and Unemployment Claims Filings Updates – The
Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) has seen an exponential rise in calls and
communications regarding unemployment. They have fielded questions regarding the
length of time applicants may expect to wait for payment. They relayed that payments
should be made to approved applicants within two weeks of an approved application.
Those payments will be backdated to the effective date of the claim so claimants are
not penalized for any delay in processing or application.
TWC continues to make improvements pertaining to handling the backlog of claims.
Improvements to their system include the following:
Adding 800 voice recognition phone lines, and planning to add additional
300 lines.
Quadrupling server capacity for online claims.
Moving website to a platform that allows for unlimited simultaneous users.
Adding 3 private call centers; 1 is already operational, 1 will be operational
on April 10, and 1 is currently in contract negotiations.
o This will add an additional 750 people to take calls.
Transferring 700 employees from other divisions to assist with calls.
Using Texas House and Senate staffers to provide additional support.
3
Increasing chat bot assistance capacity and increasing ability to respond to
questions.
Implementing changes to online systems to process claims under the
CARES Act.
There is a new Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims report, as provided by the US
Department of Labor, which was released on April 9. The news release regarding the
report is available here. The report includes preliminary state level data, which showed
that 313,832 individuals filed an unemployment claim in Texas the week of April 4.
TWC provided official and unofficial data related to the number of claims received
over the past few weeks. The attachment provides the claims through the week of
March 28, 2020 for Denton, Dallas, Collin, and Tarrant Counties. In addition, TWC
posted claims filed through different systems (internet, telephone, other) for last 8
weeks (including unofficial data from the current week). That and other data sets are
available here. Additional local data, including data specific to the City of Denton, will
be released later in April. Staff contact: Jessica Rogers, Economic Development
D. Public Comments Instructions – At the April 7 City Council meeting, a resident made
the statement that the City’s website indicated that written comments would be read at
the council meeting. This was not accurate. Instructions on how to comment on agenda
items for virtual meetings is currently shared on two web pages, the form itself, and in
an April 3 press release. In the press release and on the Public Meetings and Comment
area regarding Council Meetings, the language about Virtual White Cards states:
“Similar to when a citizen submits a white card to indicate their position on the item,
these comment forms will be sent directly to City Council members and recorded by
the City Secretary. The Mayor will announce the number of Comment Cards submitted
in support or opposition to an item during the public comment period.” On the comment
form itself, the instructions at the beginning state: “Comments made through this form
will be entered into the record and emailed to each Council member. Comments will
not be read during the meeting.” To ensure there is no confusion at future meetings,
staff updated the aforementioned web pages to explicitly include the statement on the
form that states, “Comments will not be read during the meeting.” Staff contact: Ryan
Adams, Public Affairs
E. Green Tree Estates Update – In anticipation of an April 21 Work Session Discussion
regarding Green Tree Estates, staff would like to provide the Council with a brief
update on the status of the neighborhood, and progress on direction received from the
Council. At the February 4 City Council meeting, the Council extended the declaration
of local disaster for Green Tree Estates through May 22, 2020. This extension also
included the continuation of the authority for up to $100,000 in expenditures toward
temporary water provision for the residents of Green Tree Estates. Staff continues to
deliver non-potable water to the neighborhood three times per week, which is billed to
each residence as of February 13.
During the February 4 and February 18 meetings, staff and Council reiterated that
property owners would be responsible for securing the means to conduct the
construction work to connect to the city water meter, and pay the requisite fees
associated with the connection. Additionally, Council reiterated its request that
4
property owners take advantage of the voluntary courtesy inspections being offered by
the City of Denton and continued its direction. Council also requested that staff provide
an update no later than one month prior to the expiration of the declaration of disaster
(May 23). Subsequent to February 18 Council meeting, staff mailed information
(attached) to all Green Tree Estates residents (in both English and Spanish) that
communicated the status of the emergency declaration, direction from the Council,
frequently asked questions, steps to connect to the City system, and other important
information. This information was also conveyed to LULAC and Movimiento Cosecha.
After the February 18 meeting, City staff met with representatives of Habitat for
Humanity and requested that they assist residents with courtesy inspections for the
residents. Habitat conducted courtesy inspections for owner-occupied properties and,
at this time, the results of those inspections have not been shared with the City.
Additionally, the City issued notices to property owners with dilapidated and
abandoned structures located within the neighborhood. Subsequent to those notices,
permits were secured by property owners to remove thirteen (13) of those structures.
As of this date, all but three (3) structures have been removed.
With the emergency of the COVID-19 pandemic, City Council approved a declaration
of disaster that suspended all utility shutoffs for non-payment. While Green Tree
Estates residents will still be billed for water, all residents will receive regular delivery
of non-potable water regardless of payment status. A March 21 in-person meeting with
residents was scheduled to inquire as to the status of the residents’ desire to connect to
the City’s water system. The meeting was subsequently cancelled at the residents’
request due to COVID-19 concerns. A scheduled April 18 on site visit will also be
cancelled due to the City’s Stay at Home order.
As of April 3, 2020, the City has expended $46,856.37 in personnel costs, equipment,
and supplies. To date, no residents have requested courtesy inspections be performed
by the City. Staff will prepare an update for the Council at their April 21 Work Session.
Staff contact: Ryan Adams, Public Affairs.
F. Personal Protective Equipment Donations – Since the City’s initial plea for PPE and
cleaning supplies donations, Fire Department staff received over 50 emails from
citizens, dozens of social media replies, countless phone calls, and over 20,000 people
reached on social media postings. We have been continually supplied, by citizens, small
donations of masks, gloves, gowns, and cleaning supplies at neighborhood fire stations.
We also received many large corporate donations, including the following:
Sally Beauty Supply – 200 surgical masks
Home Depot – 69 respirator masks
UNT – 200 surgical masks
DFW Care & Ram Union – 800 masks (surgical and N95)
Angel Hospitality – 4000 masks (featured on DTV)
Sam’s Club – large cache of cleaning supplies with promise of more to keep
warehouse supplies stocked
5
The Police Department also received direct donations from businesses and private
citizens.
Solaris Hospice – 50 2-4 oz bottles of hand sanitizer
Allen Pharmacy – 30 2 oz bottles of hand sanitizer
Larry White/Legends Athletic Supply – 150 cloth masks
Private Citizen – 500 cloth masks
Nature’s Mercantile – 8 1 gallon jugs of hand sanitizer
Private Citizen – 2 bottles of Clorox and a case of bottled water
Private Citizen – 100 disposable hospital scrub masks
Police Employee – 50 disposable hospital scrub masks
City staff are grateful to the community for their contributions during the COVID-19
pandemic. Staff contacts: David Boots, Fire / Sarah Keith, Police
G. COVID-19 Information and Referrals Partnership with United Way – Due to the
COVID-19 pandemic, many residents and businesses are facing hardships due to the
physical distancing requirements necessary to slow the spread of the disease. During
this time, numerous state and federal resources have been made available to assist
citizens and business operators, including provisions within the CARES Act of 2020.
Understanding and accessing these resources can be daunting for residents and business
operators and, as a result, the City is building a program with United Way of Denton
County (UWDC) to act as a bridge between those critical resources, such as federal
loans, state unemployment services, housing, legal services, and other assistance
opportunities, for those in our community who need them. Within this program, UWDC
will expand its existing Information and Referrals service, which normally connects
residents to social services providers. This includes services that benefit those residents
and businesses most impacted by the effects of the pandemic. The beneficiaries of the
service would include renters, the recently unemployed, as well as small businesses.
Residents or businesses would simply contact UWDC by phone, an online help portal,
or email, then provide some initial information on their needs. They would then work
with a UWDC representative, receive information on these resources directly, or be
connected with a legal, financial, or other professional who will provide assistance.
UWDC will administer the program and utilize its existing network of financial and
legal professionals and institutions to provide advice and guidance for program
participants. The City of Denton will provide financial resources to fund the UWDC
staff members assigned to this program and other program costs that may arise.
Additionally, City staff can be made available to supplement the UWDC staff if needed.
The City and UWDC will evaluate the program on a regular basis and make
6
modifications to better equip our community members while staying responsive to the
changing COVID-19 environment. City and UWDC staff tentatively expect the
program to launch prior to the end of next week. Staff contact: Ryan Adams, Public
Affairs
H. Response to Engage Denton Comment Regarding Compost Sales – The attached
memo is a response from Water & Wastewater Utilities staff regarding a comment
made on Engage Denton concerning compost sales. Staff contact: Frank Pugsley,
Water & Wastewater Utilities
I. Department of Energy Webinar – On April 6, Council Member Briggs forwarded
information to staff about a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Webinar that was to be
held on April 8 titled “Better Buildings”: Field Tech Validation Partnerships.
Sustainability Staff participated in the webinar that highlighted a potential partnership
with state and local governments to field test three experimental technologies. The
selected organization would be used as a field experimental site by contributing one or
multiple buildings that meet optimal criteria as outlined in the webinar. Staff would
need to analyze city-owned buildings to identify over the next two weeks if any of them
meet the DOE’s specific criteria. Because of the current conditions with COVID-19
precautions and a very short turnaround time for the application deadline, staff does
not believe that there is enough time for building analysis. Staff will continue to look
for other partnership and research opportunities to explore experimental technologies.
Staff contact: Katherine Barnett, Sustainability
J. April Citizen Connection Digital Distribution – Due to the COVID-19 pandemic
affecting the resources and delivery timetables of our Citizen Connection newsletter
printing vendor, staff was notified that the vendor would not be meeting its deadline
for the timely distribution of the April Citizen Connection. In an effort to deliver
information when residents need it, we are forgoing the print distribution and taking a
broad digital delivery approach for the April issue. A digital copy of the Citizen
Connection will be emailed to all utility customers that have an email address on file
with the City (approximately 12,000 in total). Additionally, staff will distribute the
publication through its Facebook, Twitter, and Nextdoor social media accounts. The
City will also continue to communicate individual articles and critical information
contained within the April edition over the next three to four weeks. Staff will continue
to monitor the effect of COVID-19 on our publications and make adjustments where
necessary to ensure residents stay informed in a timely manner. Staff contact: Ryan
Adams, Public Affairs
K. Montecito Crosswalk – On February 22, Council Member Briggs requested that staff
assess the crosswalk on Montecito Dr. near White Dove. Staff looked at this area soon
after and determined that a crosswalk would be appropriate. This crosswalk has now
been reinstalled. Staff contact: Brian Jahn, Capital Projects
L. Good Samaritan Village Stop Sign – On March 3, Council Member Briggs forwarded
a resident concern that requested a stop sign be placed on Ryan Road at the entrance to
the Good Samaritan Village. Staff reviewed the location and determined that an all-
way stop is warranted based on recent crash data and the offset nature of the
7
intersections. This all-way stop is scheduled to be installed by the end of April. Staff
contact: Brian Jahn, Capital Projects
M. Gleenwood Lane School Zone Signage – On March 6, Mayor Pro Tem Hudspeth staff
to assess the current signage that notifies drivers of the school zone area on Glenwood
Ln, near the intersection at Windsor Dr. Staff reviewed the location and determined
that significant sign changes are required, and will attempt to correct these conditions
while school is not in session. Staff contact: Brian Jahn, Capital Projects.
N. Customer Service Accounts Verification – On April 6, Council Member Meltzer
forwarded a question for clarification from Customer Service regarding information
collected for accounts changes. Any activity that either makes a monetary impact to
account charges or is related to account specific information requires Customer Service
staff to validate the caller as authorized to obtain such information. In the case of adding
or removing a yard cart, we only require the caller to verify the last four digits of the
ID on file.
It should be noted, however, that some accounts were started long before identity theft
laws required maintenance of identifying information. In these instances, since there
might not be any ID information on file for the account, Customer Service staff are
unable to verify the caller. In these situations, staff would require the full social security
number in order to validate identity over the phone. They would also ask for a second
ID number that could be used to validate the account. If customers do not want to
provide this information via phone, they would normally be requested to come to the
lobby and provide the information. Since the lobby is closed in response to the COVID-
19 crisis, callers are informed that they may mail a copy of their driver’s license so the
account may be updated.
Identify theft protection laws require Customer Service staff to validate the customer
before making changes to the account. In addition to mail, staff can accept a copy of
the driver’s license in the night drop since the office is closed. Customer Service staff
never recommend emailing personal information since email is not a secure form of
transmission. Staff contact: Christa Foster, Customer Service
O. Virtual Rec Center – Although nothing can take the place of a real recreation center
bustling with programs, people, and employees, the outreach a recreation center
provides is something Parks and Recreation staff felt could be patched with a virtual
recreation center. Staff created a virtual recreation center that can provide Denton
residents with ways to connect to their favorite Parks and Recreation staff through
videos, blogs, and other easy to access opportunities. The virtual center focuses on
health and fitness, virtual events, at-home crafting, and learning opportunities for
children and families. The virtual rec center can be accessed at
www.cityofdenton.com/virtualreccenter. Staff contact: Laura Behrens, Parks and
Recreation
P. Mowing Schedule – Beginning on March 18 through April 5, the Park Maintenance
staff worked on a skeleton crew and focused their attention on high priority items and
keeping parks and playgrounds safe. When the Parks and Recreation Department was
able to bring in more workers on Monday, April 8, safely, staff was able to return their
8
focus to other tasks, which included mowing. Staff began mowing areas with high
visibility, parks, and other public building areas on a regular schedule, but are still
catching up during the two weeks without conventional attendance. During that time,
there were many rainy days, which also impacted the grass and turf. Contractors are
also still mowing. Staff contact: Drew Huffman, Parks and Recreation
Q. Increased Communication Efforts – Parks and Recreation and Keep Denton Beautiful
have been working on increasing communications to residents during the last month to
maintain an open line of dialogue and transparency during the pandemic. Below are
some statistics that show these efforts.
Parks and Recreation Email Distribution
o 248,306 Emails Sent, 67,410 Emails Opened
o 28% Open Rate (likely higher given not all email programs report
opened emails)
Keep Denton Beautiful Email Distribution
o 10,518 Emails Sent
o 3,226 Emails Opened
o 31% Average Open Rate (likely higher given not all email programs
report opened emails)
Facebook Reaches
o 102,495 Impressions, 69,317 Reached
o 8,596 Post Engagements
Staff contact: Maria Denison, Parks and Recreation
R. Virtual Easter Events – Parks and Recreation staff worked quickly to create virtual
Easter events in lieu of the normal Easter Egg’stravaganza and Teen Twilight Egg Hunt
events. This year, staff took pictures of the Easter Bunny in locations around Denton
like South Lakes Park and the Bayless Selby House Museum. A Facebook event was
created on the Denton Parks page, and the pictures were posted daily with a random
winner selected to receive a basket of eggs and other goodies previously gathered for
the Teen Twilight Egg Hunt.
Staff also organized Zoom chats with the Easter Bunny and its handler. The Zoom chats
were on Thursday, April 9, and Friday, April 10. After the initial 28 spots filled up
within 30 minutes of posting, an additional 11 spots were offered. The calls were free,
and staff stated the children enjoyed the calls. Staff contact: Maria Denison, Parks and
Recreation
S. COVID-19 Videos – In addition to launching a videoconferencing platform for the City
Council meetings and a Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, staff collaborated
on and released several videos relating to the City’s and community’s response to the
COVID-19 pandemic. Staff will continue to adapt what we do and how we do it to tell
these impactful Denton stories during this unprecedented time. Staff contact: Billy
Matthews, Public Affairs/DTV
9
Mayor Watts:
First Address
Second Address
We Are:
United
Delivering
Together… Apart
Human Resources
Denton Strong:
Medical Donations
Our Daily Bread
DME Lineman
Inspiring Firefighter
We Are Working for You:
City Staff
United Way of Denton County:
Gary Henderson
III. Upcoming Community Events and Meetings
A. Events
All City-sponsored events and programs are suspended through Monday,
May 4, or until further notice. Certain areas of Parks and Recreation facilities
will also be closed through Monday, May 4, or until further notice, such as
gymnasiums, fitness areas, meeting rooms, and the walking track at the Denton
Civic Center. Signs will be posted at these facilities. As conditions change,
these periods may be extended, and additional announcements may be made.
B. Community Meetings
All City-sponsored meetings are also suspended through Monday, May 4, or
until further notice. As conditions change, these periods may be extended, and
additional announcements may be made.
IV. Attachments
A. Texas Workforce Commission Data ....................................................................12
B. Green Tree Estates Communication .....................................................................13
C. Water & Wastewater Utilities Memo ...................................................................47
V. Informal Staff Reports
A. 2020-031 PPE Status and Mitigation Strategies ...................................................50
B. 2020-032 DEC February 2020 Dashboard ...........................................................55
10
C. 2020-033 Windhaven Transmission Pole .............................................................57
D. 2020-034 Urban Forest Master Plan ....................................................................59
E. 2020-035 Tree Protection During Construction .................................................139
F. 2020-036 Landmark Tree Criteria ......................................................................142
VI. Council Information
A. Council Requests for Information .....................................................................146
B. Council Calendar ...............................................................................................147
C. Draft Agenda for April 21 ..................................................................................150
D. Future Work Session Items ...............................................................................157
E. Street Construction Report ................................................................................158
11
County 3/28/2020 3/7/2020
Denton 9,520 5,657 293
Collin 9,371 6,082 368
Dallas 26,031 17,025 1103
Tarrant 24,694 13,638 829
Texas UI Claims for week ending 3/28/2020
Industry Claims
Accomodation and Food Services 60,621
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 21,976
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 138
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 7,838
Construction 12,956
Educational Services 6,404
Finance and Insurance 1,824
Health Care and Social Assistance 36,901
Information 3,507
Management of Companies and Enterprises 1,448
Manufacturing 16,610
Mining 4,306
Other Services 18,520
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 9,669
Public Administration 669
Real Estate Rental and Leasing 4,757
Retail Trade 27,087
Transportation and Warehousing 5,560
Utilities 109
Wholesale Trade 6,852
#N/A 10,855
Grand Total 258,607
2020, Claims for Week Ending 2019, Claims for Week Ending
3/21/2020 3/14/2020 3/28/2019 3/21/2019 3/14/2019 3/7/2019
659 572 404 760 392
439
1215
920
1,442 1,350 1172 1455
1,286 1,321 1119 1624
543 554 446 686
12
Public Affairs Department
215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 (940) 349-8565
OUR CORE VALUES
Integrity Fiscal Responsibility Transparency Outstanding Customer Service
ADA/EOE/ADEA www.cityofdenton.com TDD (800) 735-2989
March 3, 2020
NOTICE TO GREEN TREE ESTATES
Dear Green Tree Estates Resident or Property Owner:
On Feb. 4 and Feb 18, 2020, the Denton City Council discussed the provision of water to the
residents of Green Tree Estates.
We have provided the enclosed Frequently Asked Questions list (along with attachments) that
we hope provides greater detail regarding the ongoing provision of temporary water service and
permanent connection to the City of Denton water system
The City Council encouraged Green Tree Estates property owners to take advantage of the
voluntary courtesy inspections offered by the City of Denton and to notify City staff if they
intend to connect to the City of Denton water system prior to April 21, 2020.
Neighborhood Outreach
City of Denton staff will be on-site at Green Tree Estates to answer resident and property owner
questions regarding temporary water provision and connection to the City of Denton water
system. A Spanish language translator will accompany City staff.
Saturday, March 21, 2020
Beginning at 10:00 a.m.
Saturday, April 18, 2020
Beginning at 10:00 a.m.
City staff will visit each residence, answer any questions that residents and property owners
have, and ask general questions to better understand the needs of each property.
If you are unavailable on either of these dates, please call or email using the contact information
below and staff will meet you at a time of your conven ience. You may also request a separate
meeting time through LULAC, Movimiento Cosecha, or another group.
Please direct questions via email to Ryan Adams, Deputy Director of Public Affairs, at
Ryan.Adams@cityofdenton.com or call (940) 349-8565. Questions in Spanish may be directed
to Deborah Viera at Deborah.Viera@cityofdenton.com or (940) 349-7162.
13
Departamento de Asuntos Públicos
215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 (940) 349-8565
NUESTROS VALORES FUNDAMENTALES
Integridad Responsabilidad fiscal Transparencia Excelente servicio al cliente
ADA/EOE/ADEA www.cityofdenton.com TDD (800) 735-2989
3 de marzo de 2020
AVISO A GREEN TREE ESTATES
Estimado residente o propietario de Green Tree Estates:
El 4 y el 18 de febrero de 2020, el Consejo Municipal de la Ciudad de Denton discutió el
suministro de agua a los residentes de Green Tree Estates.
Hemos proporcionado la lista adjunta de preguntas frecuentes (junto con los anexos) que
esperamos proporcione mayores detalles sobre la prestación continua del servicio de agua de la
Ciudad de Denton.
El Consejo Municipal invitó a los propietarios de Green Tree Estates a aprovechar las
inspecciones de cortesía voluntarias ofrecidas por la Ciudad de Denton y a notificar al personal
de la Ciudad si tienen la intención de conectarse al sistema de agua de la Ciudad de Denton antes
del 21 de abril de 2020.
Extensión del vecindario
El personal de la Ciudad de Denton estará en Green Tree Estates para responder a las preguntas
de los residentes y propietarios sobre el suministro temporal de agua y la conexión al sistema de
agua de la Ciudad de Denton. Un traductor del idioma español acompañará al personal de la
Ciudad.
sábado, 21 de marzo de 2020
a partir de las 10:00 a.m.
sábado, 18 de abril de 2020
a partir de las 10:00 a.m.
El personal de la Ciudad visitará cada residencia, responderá a cualquier pregunta que tengan los
residentes y los propietarios, y hará preguntas generales para entender mejor las necesidades de
cada propiedad.
Si usted no está disponible en alguna de estas fechas, llame o envíe un correo electrónico
utilizando la información de contacto que aparece a continuación y el personal se reunirá con
usted en el momento que le resulte más conveniente. También puede solicitar una cita separada
a través de LULAC, Movimiento Cosecha, u otro grupo.
Dirija sus preguntas por correo electrónico a Ryan Adams, Subdirector de Asuntos Públicos, a
Ryan.Adams@cityofdenton.com o llame al (940) 349-8565. Las preguntas en español pueden
dirigirse a Deborah Viera a Deborah.Viera@cityofdenton.com o al (940) 349-7162.
14
Green Tree Estates
March 3, 2020
Frequently Asked Questions
Relating to Feb. 3 Small Meeting and Feb 4. Council Meeting
1. How long will the City continue provide temporary water to the residents of Green Tree Estates?
On Feb. 4, 2019, the Denton City Council formally extended the Declaration of Disaster for Green Tree Estates.
This extension allows the City of Denton to continue fill the City-provided water containers, as a billed service, at
Green Tree Estates residences with non-drinkable three times per week through May 22, 2020. The City will
also keep drinkable water available for pick up at the City’s warehouse (see attached flyer).
2. What information does the City request from residents and property owners?
At the Dec. 10, 2019 City Council meeting, the Denton City Council requested the residents and property owners
provide additional information regarding the properties at Green Tree Estates. Going forward City staff requests
resident and property owner assistance in confirming, among other information:
Which Green Tree Estates properties are rented, and which are owner-occupied;
Confirmation of the owner of each occupied Green Tree Estates property; and
Confirmation of which property owners intend to connect to the City of Denton water system (see
attachment for the Steps to Connect to the City Water system).
This information will assist the City in planning for and managing future connections to the City water system.
The City of Denton will reach out to residents directly, through both the mail and onsite visits, to help confirm
this information. Residents are asked to open and carefully read any mail from the City of Denton.
3. What are the costs to connect to the City of Denton water system?
There are three categories of costs to connect to the City water system:
Main Line, Tap, and Valve Charge. The water line that would serve Green Tree Estates residents does
not currently extend to the Green Tree Estates neighborhood boundary. The main line, tap, and valve
costs would cover all work to extend the water line from its current location to the boundary. By
ordinance, these costs must be paid for by the Green Tree Estates residents who connect to the city
system. The specific cost depends on the number of connections to properties (please see attached
chart). For instance, if a few properties connect, the cost per property would be higher than if 14
properties connected. Costs are paid to the City of Denton.
Tap, Meter, and Impact Fee. These fees allow the meter (the device that measures the amount of water
used by a customer) to be placed on the Green Tree Estates neighborhood boundary. Each customer
will receive one meter. The fees are standard City fees that would be paid by any person wishing to
connect to the City of Denton anywhere in the City. Fees are paid to the City of Denton (please see
attached chart).
Private Connection to the Meter. Once a meter is placed at the neighborhood boundary by the City, the
property owner must connect it to the residence. The City does not perform or manage this process;
however, this work will be required to be permitted and inspected. Typically, this work is performed by
a licensed plumber hired by the property owner, though a licensed plumber is not required for all the
work and property owners may find various ways to reduce costs.
15
Cost Estimates:
Main Line, Tap, and Valve Charge: See attached chart.
Tap, meter and Impact Fees: $6,938 per meter
Private Connection: Variable.
In addition to the cost chart, s taff has attached a graphic to help illustrate the different costs to connect to the
City water system.
4. Will the city accept a payment plan for the cost of the meter, impact fee, etc.?
No. The Code of Ordinances requires meter, impact, etc. fees to be paid prior to the installation of the meter.
5. Who can conduct the trenching and make the plumbing connections?
Any plumbing work must be permitted and inspected by the City. A person who owns the property that they
reside on may perform the plumbing work on that property, though any owner-occupied work must be
permitted and inspected prior to concealment or connection. Any work done on rental property, must be
permitted, performed by a licensed plumber, and inspected by the City.
Trench digging is not addressed in the plumbing code and does not have to be performed by a licensed plumber,
so long as it conforms with the City code requirements.
The City requests that residents and property owners consult the City regarding what work may or may not need
to be performed by a licensed plumber.
6. Does the City have a list of licensed plumbers that can be contacted for plumbing work?
The City can provide residents and property owners a list of all licensed plumbers who are registered with the
City.
7. What inspections should property owners or residents expect if they choose to connect to the City of Denton
water system?
In accordance with State law, the City’s Building Safety department will conduct a Customer Service Inspection
(CSI). A CSI is an examination of the private water distribution facility for the purpose of providing or denying
water service. The inspection is limited to the identification and prevention of cross-connections, potential
contaminant hazards, and illegal lead materials. Customer service inspections are com pleted before providing
continuous water service to new construction, on any existing service where there is reason to believe that
cross-connections or other potential contaminant hazards exist, or after any material improvement, correction,
or addition to private water distribution facilities. A CSI inspection is required to be performed by a licensed
inspector. The City of Denton inspection staff is licensed in accordance with State law and is the inspection is
included as portion of the plumbing inspection processes.
As part of the Customer Service Inspection, property owners must also prove that the property has a functioning
sewage disposal system. The City does not perform on -site inspections; this function is performed by an
independent TCEQ licensed On-Site Sewage Facilities (OSSF) Professional.
The City’s Building Safety department will verify if any life safety concerns exist;
a. Exposed electrical connections
b. Propane or natural gas connections
c. Venting of propane or natural gas appliances
d. General overview of potential hazards which may result in serious injury or death
16
8. What happens if a residence does not make a connection to the City of Denton water system?
Residential dwellings are required to have basic elements; water, sewage, electrical and a means to condition
the space being occupied (heat). Residential structures which do not include these basic elements can be
considered unsafe and uninhabitable.
9. Do I need to be concerned with my septic system?
All properties that are connected to the City of Denton water system must have a way to dispose of waste
water. This is required to protect the public from pollutants. While most properties in the City of Denton are
connected to the City’s sewer system, others have on-site sewage facilities – mostly through a septic system.
Conventional septic systems, also called anaerobic systems, are wholly underground and operate by gravity, so
electricity is rarely required. Aerobic systems actively treat and pump the treated wastewater to the drain field,
which requires electricity. Both systems (whether anaerobic or aerobic) should be maintained regularly by a
state-licensed professional. Without appropriate maintenance, a system can malfunction causing possible
exposure of untreated waste water to drinking water sources. It is the owner’s responsibility to keep a septic
effectively operating and to prevent any malfunction.
If a residence is not currently served by a septic system, the City of Denton may issue a permit for a new system,
provided all requirements are met. Permits are also required when a malfunctioning system needs repair,
alteration, or extension. Small lot sizes present challenges that may preclude a planned system from meeting all
state rule requirements. If a permit application for a septic system does not meet all technical requirements, the
City will not be able to issue a permit for construction. Permit fees are only paid for new permits; there are no
ongoing fees. Inspections are also only conducted when a septic system is constructed, altered, repaired, or
extended, or when a complaint is filed. There are no other inspections conducted by City staff on a continuing
basis.
NOTE: All water lines, whether public or private lines, must be set back a certain distance from septic systems.
With the smaller lot sizes within Green Tree Estates, these requirements may present a challenge for property
owners. Owners are encouraged to consult with a licensed plumber or licensed OSSF professional (see question
below) to determine where lines must be placed to meet all septic system setback requirements. Any property
that cannot meet setback requirements cannot connect to the City of Denton water system.
10. What if my septic system is not functioning?
It is important to note both State law and the City’s Municipal Code require residential properties to have an
approved sewage disposal system. An independent TCEQ licensed On-Site Sewage Facilities (OSSF) Professional
can inspect the septic system and work with the property owner to coordinate a repair. Generally, when an
OSSF is found to be malfunctioning, state law requires that the owner has 30 days to return to compliance and
repair the malfunction. Please see attached list of Denton County licensed OSSF Professionals from the TCEQ
website https://www.tceq.texas.gov/permitting/ossf/ossfhomeowners.html.
Temporary Water Service Billing (Feb. 13 – May 22)
1. What is the cost of the water per month?
The City charges $0.0052 per gallon of water. Each customer will be charged for the amount of water to fill each
275-gallon tank and 55-gallon barrel three times per week. This equates to a monthly water charge of $20.59
for customers with one (1) 275-gallon tank and $37.75 for customers with two (2) 275-gallon tanks. Attached is
a chart that shows the cost for each Green Tree Estates residence.
17
2. How and what is the process for establishing payment by GTE residents?
Each property currently receiving temporary water will receive a bill through the mail for each billing period.
Billing will be on a pre-pay basis and will be issued by mail. Payment may be submitted in person, by mail, or
electronically.
If a property does not pay their bill, they will not receive temporary water service. If a property pays their bill
late, they will receive water on the next scheduled delivery day.
3. What community partners might be able to offer financial or other assistance?
The City of Denton provides financial assistance information for water customers experiencing short-term
financial emergencies which might prevent them for paying for utility service. This information is attached.
Additionally, Habitat For Humanity and Serve Denton, two local nonprofit organizations, have expressed an
interest in assisting the residents and property owners of Green Tree Estates. These organizations will contact
Green Tree Estates property owners and residents directly or through LULAC or Movimiento Cosecha.
Other Frequently Asked Questions
11. Will the city allow for the property owners to hire their own inspectors to conduct the inspections at the
homes?
No. While the property owners may request any qualified individual inspect their property at any time,
independent inspectors do not represent the City and may not accurately represent City code requirements and
life safety concerns. The City recommends property owners request voluntary courtesy inspections from the City
of Denton to best understand deficiencies with a property. See attached information on courtesy inspections.
12. Does the City need a written plan to correct any life, safety, and health violations found through the courtesy
inspections?
No. The City does not require a written plan to bring a residence into compliance. The City requests that
residents work with the Development Services Department in setting a plan
13. Does a backflow prevention device prevent the need for a Customer Service Inspection prior to connection to
the City water system?
No. Under state law, even with the presence of a backflow device the City is still required to perform a Customer
Service Inspection prior to connecting to the City system.
14. Will the City waive permit fees for the residents of Green Tree Estates?
No, the City does not waive permit fees without the consent of the City Council.
18
Green Tree Estates
3 de marzo de 2020
Preguntas frecuentes
Relativo a la pequeña reunión del 3 de febrero y a la reunión del consejo del 4 de
febrero
1. ¿Cuánto tiempo continuará la Ciudad proveyendo agua temporal a los residentes de Green Tree Estates?
El 4 de febrero de 2019, el Consejo Municipal de Denton extendió formalmente la Declaración de Desastre para
Green Tree Estates. Esta extensión permite a la Ciudad de Denton continuar llenando los contenedores de agua
suministrados por la Ciudad, como un servicio facturado, en las residencias de Green Tree Estates con agua no
potable tres veces por semana hasta el 22 de mayo de 2020. La Ciudad también mantendrá agua potable
disponible para su entrega en el almacén de la Ciudad (consulte el folleto adjunto).
2. ¿Qué información pide la Ciudad a los residentes y propietarios?
En la reunión del Consejo Municipal del 10 de diciembre de 2019, el Consejo Municipal de Denton pidió a los
residentes y propietarios que proporcionaran información adicional sobre las propiedades de Green Tree
Estates. A partir de ahora, el personal de la Ciudad solicitará ayuda a los residentes y a los propietarios para
confirmar, entre otras cosas:
Qué propiedades de Green Tree Estates se rentan y cuáles están ocupadas por sus propietarios;
Confirmación del propietario de cada propiedad ocupada de Green Tree Estates; y
Confirmación de qué propietarios tienen la intención de conectarse al sistema de agua de la Ciudad de
Denton (consulte el anexo para ver los pasos para conectarse al sistema de agua de la ciudad).
Esta información ayudará a la Ciudad en la planificación y gestión de futuras conexiones al sistema de agua de la
ciudad. La Ciudad de Denton se comunicará directamente con los residentes, tanto por correo postal como por
visitas in situ, para ayudar a confirmar esta información. Se pide a los residentes que abran y lean
cuidadosamente cualquier correo de la Ciudad de Denton.
3. ¿Cuáles son los costos de conectar al sistema de agua de la Ciudad de Denton?
Hay tres categorías de costos para conectarse al sistema de agua de la ciudad:
Cargo de línea principal, grifo y válvula. La línea de agua que serviría a los residentes de Green Tree
Estates no se extiende actualmente hasta el límite del vecindario de Green Tree Estates. Los costos de la
línea principal, el grifo y la válvula cubrirían todo el trabajo para extender la línea de agua desde su
ubicación actual hasta el límite. Por ordenanza, estos costos deben ser pagados por los residentes de
Green Tree Estates que se conectan al sistema de la ciudad. El costo específico depende del número de
conexiones a las propiedades (consulte el cuadro adjunto). Por ejemplo, si solo algunas propiedades se
conectan, el costo por propiedad seria más alto que si 14 propiedades se conectan. Los costos se pagan
a la Ciudad de Denton.
Tarifa de grifo, medidor e impacto. Estas tarifas permiten que el medidor (el dispositivo que mide la
cantidad de agua utilizada por un cliente) se coloque en el límite del vecindario de Green Tree Estates.
Cada cliente recibirá un medidor. Las tarifas son las tarifas estándar de la Ciudad que serían pagadas por
cualquier persona que desee conectarse a la Ciudad de Denton en cualquier lugar de la Ciudad. Las
tarifas se pagan a la Ciudad de Denton (consulte el cuadro adjunto).
19
Conexión privada al medidor. Una vez que la Ciudad coloca un medidor en el límite del vecindario, el
dueño de la propiedad debe conectarlo a la residencia. La Ciudad no realiza ni gestiona este proceso; sin
embargo, se deberá permitir e inspeccionar este trabajo. Por lo general, este trabajo lo realiza un
plomero con licencia contratado por el propietario, aunque no se requiere un plomero con licencia para
todo el trabajo y los propietarios pueden encontrar varias maneras de reducir los costos.
Cálculos de costes:
Cargo de línea principal, grifo y válvula: Consulte el cuadro adjunto.
Tarifas de grifo, medidor e impacto: $6,938 por metro
Conexión privada: Variable.
Además del cuadro de costos, el personal tiene adjunto un cuadro para ayudar a ilustrar los diferentes costos de
conexión al sistema de agua de la ciudad.
4. ¿Aceptará la Ciudad un plan de pago para el costo del medidor, la tarifa de impacto, etc.?
No. El Código de Ordenanzas exige que se paguen las tarifas de medidor, impacto, etc. antes de la instalación del
medidor.
5. ¿Quién puede hacer las zanjas y las conexiones de plomería?
Cualquier trabajo de plomería debe ser permitido e inspeccionado por la Ciudad. Una persona que sea
propietaria de la propiedad en la que también reside puede realizar el trabajo de plomería en esa propiedad,
aunque cualquier trabajo en propiedades ocupadas por el propietario debe ser permitido e inspeccionado antes
de su ocultación o conexión. Cualquier trabajo realizado en una propiedad de renta debe ser permitido,
realizado por un plomero con licencia, e inspeccionado por la Ciudad.
La excavación de zanjas no está contemplada en el código de plomería y no tiene que ser realizada por un
plomero con licencia, siempre y cuando cumpla con los requisitos del código de la Ciudad.
La Ciudad solicita que los residentes y los propietarios consulten a la Ciudad con respecto a qué trabajo puede o
no tener que ser realizado por un plomero con licencia.
6. ¿Tiene la ciudad una lista de plomeros con lice ncia que pueden ser contactados para trabajos de plomería?
La Ciudad puede proporcionar a los residentes y a los propietarios una lista de todos los plomeros con licencia
que están registrados en la Ciudad.
7. ¿Qué inspecciones deben esperar los propietarios o residentes si deciden conectarse al sistema de agua de la
Ciudad de Denton?
De acuerdo con la ley estatal, el departamento de seguridad de edificios de la Ciudad llevará a cabo una
inspección de servicio al cliente (CSI). Una CSI es un examen de la instalación privada de distribución de agua con
el fin de proporcionar o negar el servicio de agua. La inspección se limita a la identificación y prevención de las
conexiones cruzadas, los posibles riesgos de contaminación y los materiales de plomo ilegales. Las inspecciones
de servicio al cliente se realizan antes de proporcionar un servicio continuo de agua a las nuevas construcciones,
en cualquier servicio existente donde haya razones para creer que existen conexiones cruzadas u otros posibles
peligros de contaminación, o después de cualquier mejora, corrección o adición material a las instalaciones
privadas de distribución de agua. La inspección de la CSI la debe realizar un inspector con licencia. El personal de
inspección de la Ciudad de Denton está autorizado de acuerdo con la ley estatal y la inspección se incluye como
parte de los procesos de inspección de la plomería.
Como parte de la inspección de servicio al cliente, los propietarios también deben comprobar que la propiedad
tiene un sistema de eliminación de aguas residuales en funcionamiento. La Ciudad no realiza inspecciones in
20
situ, esta función la realiza un profesional independiente con licencia de la TCEQ para instalaciones de
alcantarillado in situ (OSSF).
El departamento de seguridad de edificios de la ciudad verificará si existe alguna preocupación por la seguridad
de la vida;
a. Conexiones eléctricas expuestas
b. Conexiones de propano o gas natural
c. Ventilación de los aparatos de propano o gas natural
d. Descripción general de los posibles peligros que pueden provocar lesiones graves o la muerte
8. ¿Qué pasa si una residencia no hace una conexión al sistema de agua de la Ciudad de Denton?
Se requiere que las viviendas residenciales tengan los elementos básicos: agua, alcantarillado, electrici dad y un
medio para acondicionar el espacio que se ocupa (calor). Las estructuras residenciales que no incluyen estos
elementos básicos pueden considerarse como inseguras e inhabitables.
9. ¿Necesito preocuparme por mi sistema séptico?
Todas las propiedades que están conectadas al sistema de agua de la Ciudad de Denton deben tener una forma
de eliminar las aguas residuales. Esto es necesario para proteger al público de los contaminantes. Mientras que
la mayoría de las propiedades en la Ciudad de Denton están conectadas al sistema de alcantarillado de la
Ciudad, otras tienen instalaciones de alcantarillado in situ, en su mayoría a través de un sistema séptico.
Los sistemas sépticos convencionales, también llamados sistemas anaeróbicos, son totalmente subterráneos y
funcionan por gravedad, por lo que rara vez se requiere electricidad. Los sistemas anaeróbicos tratan
activamente y bombean las aguas residuales tratadas al campo de drenaje, lo que requiere electricidad. Ambos
sistemas (ya sea anaeróbico o aeróbico) deben ser mantenidos regularmente por un profesional con licencia del
Estado. Sin el mantenimiento adecuado, un sistema puede funcionar mal causando una posible exposición de
aguas residuales no tratadas a las fuentes de agua potable. Es responsabilidad del propietario mantener un
sistema séptico funcionando eficazmente y prevenir cualquier mal funcionamiento.
Si una residencia no está actualmente abastecida por un sistema séptico, la Ciudad de Denton puede expedir un
permiso para un nuevo sistema, siempre que se cumplan todos los requisitos. También se requieren permisos
cuando un sistema en mal funcionamiento necesita reparación, ajustes o ampliación. Los lotes de tamaño
pequeño presentan desafíos que pueden impedir que un sistema planificado cumpla con todos los requisitos de
las normas estatales. Si una solicitud de permiso para un sistema séptico no cumple todos los requisitos
técnicos, la Ciudad no podrá expedir un permiso para la construcción. Las tasas de los permisos sólo se pagan
para los nuevos permisos; no hay cuotas continuas. Asimismo, las inspecciones se realizan únicamente cuando
se construye, se ajusta, se repara o se amplía un sistema séptico, o cuando se presenta una denuncia. No hay
otras inspecciones realizadas por el personal de la Ciudad de manera continua.
NOTA: Todas las líneas de agua, ya sean públicas o privadas, deben ser separadas por cierta distancia de los
sistemas sépticos. Con los tamaños de lote más pequeños dentro de Green Tree Estates, estos requisitos pueden
presentar una dificultad para los propietarios. Se invita a los propietarios a que consulten con un plomero con
licencia o un profesional del OSSF con licencia (consulte la pregunta que figura más adelante) para determinar
dónde deben colocarse las líneas para cumplir todos los requisitos de posicionamiento de sistemas sépticos.
Cualquier propiedad que no pueda cumplir con los requisitos de posicionamiento no puede conectarse al
sistema de agua de la Ciudad de Denton.
10. ¿Qué pasa si mi sistema séptico no funciona?
21
Es importante señalar que tanto la ley estatal como el código municipal de la Ciudad exigen que las propiedades
residenciales tengan un sistema de eliminación de aguas residuales aprobado. Un profesional independiente con
licencia de la TCEQ para instalaciones de alcantarillado in situ (OSSF) puede inspeccionar el sistema séptico y
trabajar con el dueño de la propiedad para coordinar una reparación. Por lo general, cuando se descubre que
una OSSF funciona mal, la ley estatal requiere que el propietario tenga 30 días para volver a cumplir y reparar el
mal funcionamiento. Consulte la lista adjunta de profesionales con licencia para OSSF del condado de Denton
del sitio web de la TCEQ https://www.tceq.texas.gov/permitting/ossf/ossfhomeowners.html.
Facturación temporal del servicio de agua (13 de febrero al 22 de mayo)
1. ¿Cuál es el costo del agua por mes?
La Ciudad cobra $0.0052 por galón de agua. A cada cliente se le cobrará la cantidad de agua para llenar cada
tanque de 275 galones y cada barril de 55 galones tres veces por semana. Esto equivale a un cargo mensual de
agua de $20.59 para los clientes con un (1) tanque de 275 galones y $3775 para los clientes con dos (2) tanques
de 275 galones. Adjunto se encuentra un cuadro que muestra el costo para cada residencia de Green Tree
Estates.
2. ¿Cómo y cuál es el proceso para establecer el pago de los residentes de GTE?
Cada propiedad que actualmente recibe agua temporal recibirá una factura por correo para cada período de
facturación. La facturación se hará por adelantado y se emitirá por correo. El pago puede efectuarse en persona,
por correo o electrónicamente.
Si una propiedad no paga su factura, no recibirá el servicio de agua temporal. Si una propiedad paga su factura
de manera extemporánea, recibirá el agua el siguiente día de entrega programado.
3. ¿Qué socios de la comunidad podrían ofrecer ayuda financiera o de otro tipo?
La Ciudad de Denton proporciona información de asistencia financiera para los clientes de agua que tienen
emergencias financieras a corto plazo que podrían impedirles pagar el servicio público. Se adjunta esta
información. Además, Habitat For Humanity y Serve Denton, dos organizaciones locales sin fines de lucro, han
expresado su interés en ayudar a los residentes y propietarios de Green Tree Estates. Estas organizaciones se
pondrán en contacto con los propietarios y residentes de Green Tree Estates directamente o a través de LULAC
o Movimiento Cosecha.
Otras preguntas frecuentes
11. ¿Permitirá la Ciudad que los propietarios contraten a sus propios inspectores para llevar a cabo las
inspecciones en las casas?
No. Aunque los propietarios pueden solicitar que cualquier persona calificada inspeccione su propiedad en
cualquier momento, los inspectores independientes no representan a la Ciudad y pueden no representar con
exactitud los requisitos del código de la Ciudad y las preocupaciones de seguridad de la vida. La Ciudad
recomienda a los propietarios que soliciten inspecciones de cortesía voluntarias de la Ciudad de Denton para
entender mejor las deficiencias de una propiedad. Consulte la información adjunta sobre las inspecciones de
cortesía.
12. ¿Necesita la Ciudad un plan escrito para corregir cualquier violación de vida, seguridad y salud encontrada a
través de las inspecciones de cortesía?
No. La Ciudad no requiere un plan escrito para poner una residencia en conformidad. La Ciudad pide que los
residentes trabajen con el Departamento de Servicios de Desarrollo en el establecimiento de un plan.
22
13. ¿Un dispositivo de prevención de reflujo evita la necesidad de una inspección de servicio al cliente antes de la
conexión al sistema de agua de la Ciudad?
No. Según la ley estatal, incluso con la presencia de un dispositivo de reflujo, la Ciudad sigue estando obligada a
realizar una inspección de servicio al cliente antes de conectarse al sistema de la Ciudad.
14. ¿La Ciudad renunciará a las tarifas de permiso para los residentes de Green Tree Estates?
No, la Ciudad no renuncia a las tasas de permiso sin el consentimiento del Consejo Municipal.
23
Public Affairs Department
215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 (940) 349-8565
OUR CORE VALUES
Integrity Fiscal Responsibility Transparency Outstanding Customer Service
ADA/EOE/ADEA www.cityofdenton.com TDD (800) 735-2989
November 18, 2019
NOTICE TO GREEN TREE ESTATES RESIDENTS:
DRINKING WATER
Dear Green Tree Estates Resident:
In addition to the 55-gallon and 275-gallon containers that have been provided for non-drinking water use, the
City of Denton has also secured 1-gallon drinking water containers for the residents of Green Tree Estates.
These containers are located at the City’s warehouse at 901 Texas Street (see reverse side for map). From Mingo
Road:
Turn south on Frame Street
Left on Paisley Street
Left on Rose Street
Right on Texas Street
Continue through the roundabout
Turn left into warehouse parking lot
Signs will direct you to the main entrance once you are on site.
Containers will be distributed from 7 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Residents who are unable to pick
up water during that time or are unable to transport water are asked to call the City of Denton at the
numbers below.
Residents will not be asked to show identification, but they will be asked to provide their name, address, and the
number of people at their residence.
Please direct questions via email to Ryan Adams, Deputy Director of Public Affairs, at
Ryan.Adams@cityofdenton.com or call (940) 349-8565. Questions in Spanish may be directed to Deborah Viera
at Deborah.Viera@cityofdenton.com or (940) 349-7162.
24
25
Public Affairs Department
215 E. McKinney St., Denton, TX 76201 (940) 349-8565
OUR CORE VALUES
Integrity Fiscal Responsibility Transparency Outstanding Customer Service
ADA/EOE/ADEA www.cityofdenton.com TDD (800) 735-2989
18 de noviembre, 2019
NOTIFICACION A RESIDENTES DE GREEN TREE ESTATES:
AGUA PARA BEBER
Estimado Residente de Green Tree Estates:
En adición a los tambores de 55 galones y los tanques de 275 galones que se les a proveído para almacenar agua
no potable, la Ciudad de Denton tiene disponible agua para beber en contenedores de un (1) galón para los
residentes de Green Tree Estates.
Estos galones de agua están localizados en el almacén de la Ciudad que se encuentra en 901 Texas Street (vea el
mapa al reverso de esta página). De Mingo Road:
De vuelta hacia el sur en Frame Street
De vuelta hacia la izquierda en Paisley Street
De vuelta hacia la izquierda en Rose Street
De vuelta hacia la derecha en Texas Street
Continúe a través de la rotonda
De vuelta hacia la izquierda a el estacionamiento del almacén
Habrá señales que los dirigirán a la entrada cuando este en el almacén.
Los contenedores serán distribuidos de 7 a.m. a 4 p.m., lunes a viernes. Residentes que no pueden recoger agua
durante las horas designadas o no tienen transportación favor de llamar a la Ciudad de Denton a los
siguientes números.
Residentes no tendrán que presenter identificación, pero sera necesario que presenten su nombre, domicilio, y
numero de habitantes en su residencia.
Por favor dirija sus preguntas por correo electrónico a Ryan Adams, Director Adjunto de Asuntos Públicos, en
Ryan.Adams@cityofdenton.com o llame al (940) 349-8565. Las preguntas en español pueden ser dirigidas a Deborah Viera
en Deborah.Viera@cityofdenton.com o llame al (940) 349-7162.
26
27
Green Tree Estates
Steps to Connect to City Water
x
•Provide to City of Denton Development Services documentation
from a Texas licensed On-Site Sewage Facilities (OSSF)
professional that the system is function as installed.Step 1:
•Prepare a site plan with the location of the septic system and
proposed water line (from meter location to residence).Step 2:
•Licensed plumber is to apply for a permit to install the water
service line with the connections, including any other licensed
plumbing work needed for installation. Site plan will be
submitted with the permit application.
Step 3:
•Pay to City all permit, service, meter, impact and tap fees to the
City of Denton.Step 4:
•Licensed Plumber to perform all work where a plumbing license
is required. With an additional permit, owner-occupiers may
perofrm work on their own property.Step 5:
•Licensed Plumber to call for plumbing inspections which will
include a Customer Service Inspection.Step 6:
•Apply for water service with the City of Denton Utilities
Customer Service and request meter install. Provide valid
identification to City to facilitate credit check. (Water service is
billed in arrears)
Step 7:
28
Green Tree Estates
Pasos para conectarse al agua de la Ciudad
x
•Proporcionar a los Servicios de Desarrollo de la Ciudad de Denton
la documentación de un profesional de Instalaciones de
Alcantarillado in Situ (OSSF) con licencia de Texas, de que el
sistema funciona tal como está instalado.
Paso 1:
•Proporcionar a los Servicios de Desarrollo de la Ciudad de Denton
la ubicación del sistema séptico y la línea de agua propuesta
(desde la ubicación del medidor hasta la residencia) en un plano
del sitio.
Paso 2:
•El plomero con licencia debe solicitar un permiso para instalar la
línea de servicio de agua con las conexiones, incluyendo
cualquier otro trabajo de plomería con licencia necesario para la
instalación.
Paso 3:
•Pagar a la Ciudad todos los gastos de permisos, servicios,
medidores, impactos y grifos a la Ciudad de Denton.Paso 4:
•Plomero con licencia para realizar todos los trabajos en los que
se requiera una licencia de plomería. Con un permiso adicional,
los propietarios que viven en las propiedades pueden realizar el
trabajar en su propia propiedad.
Paso 5:
•Plomero con licencia para llamar a inspecciones de plomería que
incluirán una inspección de servicio al cliente.Paso 6:
•Solicitar el servicio de agua con el Servicio de Atención al Cliente
de la Ciudad de Denton y solicitar la instalación del medidor.
Proporcionar una identificación válida a la Ciudad para facilitar la
verificación de crédito. (El servicio de agua se factura en mora.)
Paso 7:
29
Green Tree Estates
Fees to City (Est.) Based on Participation
Cobros a la Ciudad (Est.) Basados en Participacion
30
2
1
2
3
Green Tree Estates Connections to Denton Water System Current City Water MainExtended Water Main
3
Water Lines
Rented
Owner Occupied Water Meters on Neighborhood BoundaryFrom the Meter to the Residents
Property owners are responsible for connecting the meter to the residents. Work must be
permitted and inspected by the City. Costs are not paid to City.
Meters
Meters will be set at the neighborhood boundary. Property owners will pay standard
City of Denton tap, meter, and impact fees. Fees totaling $6,938 are paid to the City.
Water Main Extension
To provide water to the neighborhood, an existing water line must be extended to the
neighborhood boundary. Property owners must pay for this cost, with each of the 14 property
owners in green tree paying an equal share. Costs vary depending on the number of connections.
1
On-Site Sewage Facilities
(Septic Systems):
Prior to connection, the City must verify
that a property has an on-site sewer
system (septic system) in sucient
working order to treat the property’s
wastewater. All water lines, whether
public or private lines, must be set back
a certain distance from septic systems.
Any property that cannot meet setback
requirements cannot connect to the
City of Denton water system.
If you own the property and live on
that property, state law allows you to
perform your own plumbing work on
that property. City permits and
inspections will still be required.
31
2
1
2
3
Conexiones de Green Tree Estates con el sistema de agua de Denton Cañería actual de la CiudadCañería de agua extendida
3
Líneas de agua
De renta
Ocupado por el propietario Medidores de agua en los límites del vecindarioDel medidor al residente
Los propietarios son responsables de conectar el medidor a los residentes. El trabajo
debe ser permitido e inspeccionado por la Ciudad. Los costos no se pagan a la Ciudad.
Medidores
Los medidores se jarán en el límite del vecindario. Los propietarios pagarán las tarifas
estándar de la Ciudad de Denton de grifo, medidor e impacto. Las tarifas por un total de
$6,938 se pagan a la Ciudad.
Extensión de la cañería de agua
Para abastecer agua al vecindario, una línea de agua existente debe extenderse hasta
el límite del vecindario. Los propietarios deben pagar por este costo, y cada uno de los
14 propietarios en Green Tree pagará una parte igual. Los costos varían según el número
de conexiones.
1
Instalaciones de alcantarillado in situ
(sistemas sépticos):
Antes de la conexión, la ciudad debe vericar que
la propiedad tiene un sistema de alcantarillado
(sistema séptico) en funcionamiento suciente
para tratar las aguas residuales de la propiedad.
Todas las líneas de agua, ya sean públicas o
privadas, deben ser separadas por cierta distancia
de los sistemas sépticos. Cualquier propiedad que
no pueda cumplir con los requisitos de
posicionamiento no puede conectarse al sistema
de agua de la Ciudad de Denton.
Si usted es propietario y vive en la
propiedad, la ley estatal le permite hacer
su propio trabajo de plomería en esa
propiedad. Los permisos e inspecciones
de la Ciudad seguirán siendo necesarios.
32
On-Site Sewage Facility (OSSF)
Technical Requirements Summary
State rules allow that any system installed prior to Sept. 1, 1989 can continue operation without a
permit as long as it has not been altered and is not creating a nuisance or in need of repair. An OSSF is
creating a nuisance when sewage is discharged in a manner that may allow for the transmission of
disease, or the septic tank is overflowing or otherwise blatantly discharging. In other words, if
wastewater is ponding, pooling, discharging onto adjacent property, or being discharged without proper
treatment, then the OSSF is malfunctioning. When that occurs, the system must be altered, repaired,
extended, or replaced to correct the malfunction.
In order to repair, alter, extend, or replace a system, the property owner must first apply for a permit
with the City. A Professional Engineer or Registered Sanitarian must prepare the OSSF plan that is
submitted for permit. City staff will review the permit application and planning materials for compliance
with State rules and City code. If the application meets all requirements, the City issues a construction
permit, and a licensed installation company can begin the work. After the construction is complete, the
City must inspect the system before it is covered up or in operation. The City will issue an operation
permit to the owner after the system passes inspection. The system can then be put into operation.
Texas allows for many different types of systems to be installed to achieve proper wastewater
treatment based on site conditions. Below are illustrations by the Environmental Protection Agency of
two types of OSSFs.
33
Each type of system has specific design requirements for things like sizing, location, soils, and electricity.
The Professional Engineer or Registered Sanitarian that designs the system will be familiar with these
requirements and what type of system will work best on a specific site. For example, here are excerpts
from the table that outlines when a conventional drain field system is appropriate and when it is not.
Figure: 30 TAC §285.91(5)
Table V. Criteria for Standard Subsurface
Absorption Systems.
FACTORS SUITABLE (S) UNSUITABLE (U)
Topography Slopes 0-30% Slopes greater than 30% Complex slopes
Groundwater No indication of seasonal
groundwater anywhere within 24
inches of the bottom of the
proposed excavation.
Indications of seasonal groundwater or
drainage mottles anywhere within 24 inches of
the bottom of the proposed excavation (Except
for lined ET)
Flood Hazard No flooding potential. Areas located in the floodplain and regulatory
floodway unless system designed according to
§285.31(c)(2)
Depressional areas without adequate drainage
https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/fids/30_0285_0091-15.html
34
Another set of technical requirements that must be met are minimum separation distances, or setbacks.
Setbacks are specific to different types of systems. For example, these are the required setback
distances to private and public water supply lines:
TO
FROM Tanks Soil
Absorption
Systems, &
Unlined ET
Beds
Lined
Evapotranspiration
Beds
Sewer Pipe
With
Watertight
Joints
Surface
Application
(Edge of
Spray Area)
Drip
Irrigation
Public
Water
Supply
Lines 2
10 10 10 10 10 10
Private
Water
Line
10 10 5 105 except at
connection
to structure
No
separation
distances
10
2. For additional information or revisions to these separation distances, see Chapter 290 of this title
(relating to Public Drinking Water).
5. Private water line/wastewater line crossings should be treated as public water line crossings, see
Chapter 290 of this title.
https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/fids/201206290-3.pdf
Each type of disposal system listed in the table above has its own set of design criteria, such as the
amount of area needed for disposal. With the various types of systems each having specific
requirements, it would be impracticable to list them all here. Although not impossible, it is challenging
to design a system to operate on a small lot and meet all the technical requirements. For that reason,
City code stipulates that new lots utilizing an OSSF must be on at least one acre if it is serviced by a
public water system or on two acres if it is serviced by a private water well. If you have specific
questions regarding OSSFs, please contact Heather Goins at (940) 349-8610 or
Heather.Goins@cityofdenton.com.
35
Instalación de alcantarillado in situ (OSSF)
Resumen de los requisitos técnicos
Las normas estatales permiten que cualquier sistema instalado antes del 1 de septiembre de 1989
pueda seguir funcionando sin permiso, siempre que no haya sido ajustado y no esté creando una
molestia o necesite reparaciones. Una OSSF crea una molestia cuando las aguas residuales se descargan
de una manera que puede permitir la transmisión de enfermedades, o el tanque séptico se desborda o
se descarga descaradamente de otra manera. En otras palabras, si las aguas residuales se estancan, se
acumulan, se descargan en una propiedad adyacente o se descargan sin el tratamiento adecuado,
entonces la OSSF está funcionando mal. Cuando eso ocurre, el sistema debe ser ajustado, reparado,
ampliado o reemplazado para corregir el mal funcionamiento.
Para reparar, ajustar, ampliar o reemplazar un sistema, el propietario debe solicitar primero un permiso
a la Ciudad. Un ingeniero profesional o un sanitario registrado debe preparar el plan de OSSF que se
presenta para el permiso. El personal de la Ciudad revisará la solicitud de permiso y los materiales de
planificación para cumplir con las normas estatales y el código de la Ciudad. Si la solicitud cumple con
todos los requisitos, la Ciudad emite un permiso de construcción, y una empresa de instalación con
licencia puede comenzar la obra. Después de la conclusión de la construcción, la Ciudad debe
inspeccionar el sistema antes de que se cubra o se ponga en funcionamiento. La Ciudad emitirá un
permiso de operación al propietario después de que el sistema pase la inspección. El sistema puede
entonces ponerse en funcionamiento.
Texas permite la instalación de muchos tipos diferentes de sistemas para lograr un tratamiento
adecuado de las aguas residuales en función de las condiciones del lugar. A continuación figuran
ilustraciones de la Agencia de Protección del Medio Ambiente de dos tipos de OSSF.
36
Sistema séptico
convencional
Pozo de aguas subterráneas
Agua potable a casa
Grava
Flujo de agua residual
Elevadores de
acceso
Tanque séptico
Caja de
distribución
Campo de drenaje
Aguas
residuales de
la casa
Tratamiento de aguas
residuales en suelo
Aguas subterráneas
Lecho de roca
Sistema séptico con
distribución por goteo
Tratamiento de aguas
residuales en suelo
Aguas subterráneas
Lecho de roca
Flujo de agua residual
Campo de drenaje
Pozo de aguas subterráneas
Agua potable a casa
Aguas
residuales de
la casa
Tanque séptico
Elevadores
de acceso
Nota: los sistemas sépticos varían. El diagrama no es a escala.
Nota: los sistemas sépticos varían. El diagrama no es a escala.
Tubería de
goteo
Válvula de
alivio de aire
Línea de
suministro Línea de
vuelta
Tanque de bombeo
37
Cada tipo de sistema tiene requisitos de diseño específicos para cosas como el tamaño, la ubicación, los
suelos y la electricidad. El ingeniero profesional o sanitario registrado que diseñe el sistema estará
familiarizado con estos requisitos y con el tipo de sistema que funcionará mejor en un sitio específico.
Por ejemplo, a continuación se presentan extractos del cuadro que indica cuándo un sistema de campo
de drenaje convencional es apropiado y cuándo no.
Figura: 30 TAC §285.91(5)
Cuadro V. Criterios para los sistemas de absorción
subterránea estándar.
FACTORES ADECUADO (A) NO ADECUADO (N)
Topografía Pendientes 0 a 30% Pendientes superiores al 30% Pendientes
complejas
Agua
subterránea
No hay indicación de agua
subterránea estacional en ningún
lugar dentro de las 24 pulgadas del
fondo de la excavación propuesta.
Indicaciones de agua subterránea estacional o
manchas de drenaje en cualquier lugar dentro
de las 24 pulgadas del fondo de la excavación
propuesta (excepto para ET con recubrimiento)
Peligro de
inundación
No hay potencial de inundación. Áreas localizadas en la llanura de inundación y
en la vía de inundación reglamentaria a menos
que el sistema diseñado de acuerdo con
§285.31(c)(2)
Áreas de depresión sin drenaje adecuado
https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/fids/30_0285_0091-15.html
Otro conjunto de requisitos técnicos que deben cumplirse son las distancias mínimas de separación, o
retrocesos. Los retrocesos son específicos de los diferentes tipos de sistemas. Por ejemplo, estas son las
distancias de retroceso necesarias para las líneas de suministro de agua privadas y públicas:
HACIA
DESDE Tanques Sistemas de
Absorción del
Suelo y camas
de ET sin
recubrimiento
Camas de
evapotranspiración
con recubrimiento
Tubo de
alcantarilla
con
juntas de
estanqueidad
Aplicación
en
superficie
(borde del
área de
rociado)
Irrigación
por goteo
Líneas de
suministro
de agua
pública 2
10 10 10 10 10 10
Línea de
agua
privada
10 10 5 105 excepto
en la
conexión con
la estructura
Sin
distancias
de
separación
10
2. Para información adicional o revisiones de estas distancias de separación, consulte el capítulo 290 de
este título (relativo al agua potable pública).
5. Los cruces de líneas de agua privadas/líneas de aguas residuales deben ser tratados como cruces de
líneas de agua públicas; consulte el capítulo 290 de este título.
38
https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/fids/201206290-3.pdf
Cada tipo de sistema de eliminación mencionado en el cuadro anterior tiene su propio conjunto de
criterios de diseño, como la cantidad de superficie necesaria para la eliminación. Dado que los diversos
tipos de sistemas tienen requisitos específicos, sería impracticable enumerarlos todos aquí. Aunque no
es imposible, es difícil diseñar un sistema para que funcione en un lote pequeño y cumpla todos los
requisitos técnicos. Por lo tanto, el código de la Ciudad estipula que los nuevos lotes que utilicen una
OSSF deben estar sobre al menos un acre si es abastecida por un sistema público de agua o sobre dos
acres si es abastecida por un pozo de agua privado. Si tiene preguntas específicas sobre las OSSF,
contacte a Heather Goins al (940) 349-8610 o Heather.Goins@cityofdenton.com.
39
Green Tree Estates
40
Sometimes citizens experience short‐term financial emergencies, which prevent them from paying for vital
utility service. The P‐L‐U‐S One program – Prevent Loss of Utility Service – helps families keep cool in the
summer and warm in the winter. Customers donate to the program and funds are provided to Interfaith
Ministries of Denton for distribution to residents.
The link to contact Interfaith Ministries to start the screening process for assistance is:
http://www.ifmdenton.org/i‐need‐help
After consideration of provided information, you will be contacted regarding eligibility of appointment. Please
make sure the phone number you provide is correct as Interfaith will make two (2) phone call attempts. If
unable to reach you, it is your choice to complete another initial screening form.
You MUST bring all required documents to your scheduled appointment. If you do not bring all the required
documents (listed at the bottom of this email), you will not be seen by a caseworker.
An appointment does not guarantee assistance. Assistance is determined by availability of funds, your
circumstances, and proper documentation.
Once the screening form is submitted, your case will be reviewed, and you will be contacted by the phone
number you have provided within 1 to 2 business days. If you have not received notification within 3 business
days, please call Interfaith’s client line: 940‐565‐5479 (Monday‐Friday 8am‐11:30am & 1:00pm‐3:30pm)
In order to qualify for assistance, you will need to provide documentation proving loss of income in your name
that has created this short‐term crisis. Financial Assistance cannot be provided over the telephone. Assistance
will require an office appointment.
Please note: Priority will be given to residential households whose circumstances are as follows:
Gross family income is 65% or less of the Area Median Income (AMI)
Electricity powered life‐support systems are in use
Serious illness exists with a member of the household
Disabled, homebound, or elderly residents age 65 years or above, existing on a fixed income
reside there
Small children of that household reside at the dwelling
Recent emergencies (such as a home fire, layoffs from work, excessive medical expenses, etc.)
have occurred and are beyond the applicant’s control
Families that meet the income guidelines and who have not received utility assistance within
twelve (12) months of the current application
DMU customers are eligible for assistance a maximum of three (3) times in a calendar year
*************************************************************************************
Documents Required by Interfaith Ministries:
Identification
o Head of Household must provide Driver’s License or Texas State Issued Id
o Social Security number for all household members
41
Income
o Example: Pay stubs, Food Stamp award letter, SSI or SSDI Award Letter, Verification of
Housing Assistance, Veteran Benefits, Verification of Retirement Income, child support
summary.
Expenses
o Example: Phone, cable, electric, and water bills, car insurance, car payment, outstanding
loans, rent, mortgage, etc.
Crisis
o Example: Notice of layoff or termination from employer, auto repair bill, medical receipts,
etc.
6 month payment and billing history from the City of Denton’s Municipal Utilities
While Interfaith Ministries is the organization which distributes PLUS One utility assistance donated funds,
they are not the only source for assistance. The following organizations also assist with Denton utilities.
Additional Resources:
TCOG (Texoma Council on Governments): 866‐904‐8647
o Apply at: www.tcog.com/energy/apply
o Denton Office located at Serve Denton: 306 N. Loop 288
o Hours of Operation: Monday – Thursday 7:30am – 5:30pm; Friday 7:30am – 11:30am
o Assists with electric, gas, and propane bills to income qualified households in Denton
County.
Giving Hope, Inc: 940‐382‐0609
o Office located at Serve Denton: 306 N. Loop 288
o Program Details: https://hopeincdenton.com/need‐assistance/
o Monday – Thursday 9:30am ‐11:30am and 1:30pm – 3:30pm (Friday by appointment only)
First Baptist Church: 940‐382‐2577
Cross Timbers Church: 940‐240‐5100
Singing Oaks Church of Christ: 940‐387‐4355
Community Services: 800‐831‐9929
Additional resources can be found by calling 211 or visiting
www.unitedwaydenton.org/FindHelp
42
A veces los ciudadanos sufren emergencias financieras de corto plazo que les impiden pagar por servicios
públicos vitales. El programa P‐L‐U‐S One – Prevent Loss of Utility Service– ayuda a las familias a mantenerse
frescas durante el verano y no pasar frío durante el invierno. Los clientes hacen sus donaciones al programa y
los fondos se entregan a Interfaith Ministries de Denton para ser distribuidos a los residentes.
El enlace para contactar a Interfaith Ministries e comenzar el proceso de selección para obtener ayuda es:
http://www.ifmdenton.org/i‐need‐help
Después de considerar la información provista, alguien se pondrá en contacto con usted para informarle
sobre su elegibilidad para programar una cita. Asegúrese de que el número telefónico que proporciona sea el
correcto ya que Interfaith realizará dos (2) intentos de comunicarse telefónicamente con usted. Si no logra
ponerse en contacto con usted, usted tendrá la opción de llenar otro formulario de selección inicial.
Usted DEBE traer todos los documentos requeridos a su cita programada. Si no lleva todos los documentos
requeridos (enumerados al final de este correo electrónico) usted no será recibido por un trabajador social.
La cita no garantiza asistencia. La asistencia está determinada por la disponibilidad de fondos, sus
circunstancias y la presentación de la documentación adecuada.
Una vez que se envié el formulario de evaluación, se revisará su caso y se pondrán en contacto con usted a
través del número de teléfono que usted ha proporcionado en un período de 1 o 2 días hábiles. Si no ha
recibido notificación dentro de los3 días hábiles, llame a la línea de clientes de Interfaith: 940‐565‐5479 (de
lunes a viernes de 8 am a 11:30 am y 1:00 pm a 3:30 pm).
Para calificar para recibir asistencia, usted necesitará proporcionar documentación que pruebe la pérdida de
ingresos en su nombre que haya provocado esta crisis de corto plazo. La asistencia financiera no se puede
proporcionar por telefónica. La asistencia requerirá una cita en la oficina.
Por favor tenga en cuenta: Se dará prioridad a las familias de residentes cuyas circunstancias son las
siguientes:
El ingreso familiar bruto es 65% o menos de Ingreso Media del Área (AMI).
Se utilizan sistemas de soporte vital accionados por con electricidad.
Existe una enfermedad grave con un miembro del hogar.
Los residentes discapacitados, confinados en el hogar o ancianos de 65 años o más, que tienen un
ingreso fijo residen allí
Los niños pequeños de ese hogar residan en la vivienda.
Se han producido emergencias recientes (tales como incendios en el hogar, despidos del trabajo,
gastos médicos excesivos, etc.) que están fuera del control del solicitante.
Familias que cumplen con las pautas de ingresos y que no han recibido asistencia de servicios
públicos dentro de los doce (12) meses anteriores de la solicitud actual.
Los clientes de Servicios Públicos Municipales de Denton (DMU) pueden recibir asistencia un
máximo de tres (3) veces en un año calendario.
*************************************************************************************
Documentos requeridos por Interfaith Ministries:
43
Identificación
o La persona a cargo del hogar debe presentar su licencia de conducir o documento de
identidad emitido por el estado de Texas.
o Número de seguro social de todos los miembros del hogar.
Ingresos
o Ejemplos: Talones de pagos, nota de otorgamiento de estampillas de alimentos, nota de
otorgamiento de SSI o SSDI, verificación de asistencia para viviendas, beneficios para
veteranos, verificación de ingresos por jubilación, resumen de manutención de niños.
Gastos
o Ejemplos: Facturas de teléfono, cable, electricidad y agua, seguro del automotor, pago de
automotor, préstamos, alquileres e hipotecas adeudadas, etc.
Crisis
o Ejemplos: Notificación de despido o finalización del contrato laboral de parte del
empleador, factura de reparación del automóvil, recibos médicos, etc.
Historial de pagos y facturas de los últimos 6 meses de los Servicios Públicos Municipales de
Denton.
Si bien Interfaith Ministries es la organización que distribuye los fondos donados para asistencia en el pago a
servicios públicos de PLUS One, no son la única fuente de ayuda. Las siguientes organizaciones también
proporcionan asistencia para el pago de servicios públicos de Denton.
Recursos adicionales:
TCOG (Texoma Council on Governments): 866‐904‐8647
o Solicite en: www.tcog.com/energy/apply
o Oficina de Denton ubicada en Serve Denton: 306 N. Loop 288
o Horario de atención: lunes a jueves, de 7:30am a 5:30pm; viernes de 7:30am a 11:30am
o Ayuda con las facturas de electricidad, gas y propano a hogares con ingresos calificados
dentro del condado de Denton.
Giving Hope, Inc.: 940‐382‐0609
o Oficina ubicada en Serve Denton: 306 N. Loop 288
o Detalles del programa: https://hopeincdenton.com/need‐assistance/
o De lunes a jueves, de 9:30am a 11:30am y de 1:30pm a 3:30pm (los viernes, solo concita
previa)
Primera Iglesia Bautista: 940‐382‐2577
Cross Timbers Church: 940‐240‐5100
Singing Oaks Church of Christ: 940‐387‐4355
Servicios Comunitarios (Community Services): 800‐831‐9929
Se pueden encontrar recursos adicionales llamando al 211 o visitando al sitio web
www.unitedwaydenton.org/FindHelp
44
Building Safety- Department of Development Services
215 E. Hickory St., Denton, TX 76201 (940) 349-8360
OUR CORE VALUES
Integrity Fiscal Responsibility Transparency Outstanding Customer Service
The City of Denton Building Safety division provides courtesy inspections as a service to the citizens of Denton.
This type of inspection is not intended for enforcement, rather it is intended to assist homeowners with
understanding safety concerns and helping to offer options to correct.
Courtesy Inspection
To verify if any life safety concerns exist;
o Exposed electrical connections
o Fuel gas connections
o Venting of fuel fired appliances
o General overview of potential hazards which may result in serious injury or death
EXAMPLE: Water heater installation; manufactured housing requires a specific type of water heater, these units
cost two to three times as much as a conventional water heater. Homeowners may not know manufactured
housing requires a specific water heater, coupled with cost factors many times result in an incorrect water
heater being installed. These factors raise concern of whether there are proper water connections, proper
ventilation of gas (fuel fired) appliances, and approved electrical connections. Additionally, there may be
problems associated with size and clearance of the water heater installation, ensuring proper clearances from
combustible materials.
EXAMPLE: If an addition/alteration to add plumbing (bathroom, kitchen, laundry, etc.) water, sewer, gas, electric
and other potential safety concerns.
Customer Service Inspection
Prior to continuous water service being established, Texas law requires an inspection of the private water-
distribution system as a way to ensure that the water is safe to drink. This type of customer service inspection is
required in Title 30 of the Texas Administrative Code (TAC), Subsection 290.46(j). All the rules in 30 TAC 290,
Subchapter D, are administered by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). As a component of
the law, the City of Denton is required to ensure a Customer Service Inspection (CSI) is conducted;
A Customer Service Inspection is an examination of the private water distribution system for the purpose of
providing or denying water service. The inspection is limited to the identification and prevention of cross-
connections, potential contaminant hazards, and illegal lead materials. Customer service inspections are
completed before providing continuous water service on any existing service where there is reason to believe
that cross-connections or other potential contaminant hazards exist, or after any material improvement,
correction, or addition to private water distribution facilities.
Verify no cross-connections exist;
o inspection of water service,
o checking toilet flush valves,
o checking hose bib(s),
o pressure relief valve on water heater.
Offering to provide both a courtesy inspection including a Customer Service Inspection is designed to provide
homeowners a greater understanding of the items which may require corrections prior to any other investment.
45
Departamento de Seguridad de Edificios -
Departamento de Servicios de Desarrollo
215 E. Hickory St., Denton, TX 76201 (940) 349-8360
Página 1 de 1
La División de Seguridad de Edificios de la Ciudad de Denton proporciona inspecciones de cortesía como un servicio a los
ciudadanos de Denton. Este tipo de inspección no es realizado para exigir o implementar regulaciones, sino que está
destinado a ayudar a los propietarios de viviendas a comprender los problemas de seguridad y ayudar a ofrecer opciones
adicionales o requeridas para mejorar las viviendas.
Inspección de cortesía
Los siguientes se verificarán para determinar si existen problemas que afectarían su salud/vida;
o Conexiones eléctricas expuestas
o Conexiones de gas combustible
o Ventilación de los aparatos de combustible
o Visión general de los peligros potenciales que pueden resultar en lesiones graves o la muerte
EJEMPLO: Instalación de calentador de agua; la carcasa fabricada requiere un tipo específico de calentador de agua, estas
unidades cuestan de dos a tres veces más que un calentador de agua convencional. Los propietarios pueden no saber que la
vivienda fabricada requiere un calentador de agua específico, junto con los factores de costo muchas veces resultan en un
calentador de agua que no esté apropiadamente instalado. Estos factores plantean la preocupación, como por ejemlo las
conexiones de agua adecuadas, ventilación adecuada de los aparatos de gas (combustible) y conexiones eléctricas
aprobadas. Además, puede haber problemas asociados con el tamaño y el espacio libre de la instalación del calentador de
agua, asegurando una holgura adecuada de los materiales combustibles.
EJEMPLO: Si se añade/altera plomería (baño, cocina, lavandería, etc.) agua, alcantarillado, gas, electricidad y otros posibles
problemas de seguridad.
Inspección de Servicio al Cliente
Antes de que se establezca el servicio continuo de agua, la ley de Texas requiere una inspección del sistema privado de
distribución de agua como una manera de garantizar que el agua es segura para beber. Este tipo de inspección de servicio al
cliente se requiere en el Título 30 del Código Administrativo de Texas (TAC), Subsección 290.46(j). Todas las reglas en 30
TAC 290, Subcapítulo D, son administradas por la Comisión de Calidad Ambiental de Texas (TCEQ). Como componente de la
ley, la Ciudad de Denton está obligada a garantizar que se lleve a cabo una Inspección de Servicio al Cliente (CSI);
Una Inspección de Servicio al Cliente es un examen del sistema privado de distribución de agua con el propósito de
proporcionar o denegar el servicio de agua. La inspección se limita a la identificación y prevención de conexiones cruzadas,
posibles peligros contaminantes y materiales de plomo ilegales. Las inspecciones de servicio al cliente se completan antes
de proporcionar un servicio continuo de agua en cualquier servicio existente donde haya razones para creer que existen
conexiones cruzadas u otros peligros potenciales de contaminantes, o después de cualquier mejora material, corrección, o
además de instalaciones privadas de distribución de agua.
Verificar que no existan conexiones cruzadas;
o inspección del servicio de agua,
o comprobar las válvulas de descarga del inodoro,
o babero(s) de manguera de control,
o válvula de alivio de presión en el calentador de agua.
La oferta de proporcionar una inspección de cortesía, incluyendo una inspección de servicio al cliente, está diseñada para
proporcionar a los propietarios una mayor comprensión de los artículos que pueden requerir correcciones antes de
cualquier otra inversión.
46
Water & Wastewater Utilities
901-A Texas St., Denton, TX 76209 (940) 349-8200
OUR CORE VALUES
Integrity Fiscal Responsibility Transparency Outstanding Customer Service
ADA/EOE/ADEA www.cityofdenton.com TDD (800) 735-2989
Memo
From: Frank Pugsley, Director of Water and Wastewater Utilities
Date: April 9, 2020
Re: Response to Citizen Comment from Engage Denton RE: Compost Sales
Response to Citizen Comment from Engage Denton
Name: Michael
Phone: 940-898-9000
E-mail: goob30@gmail.com
Business Name: DyNO Dirt
Business Address: City of Denton
Description: Solid Waste Compost selling & staffed - Mayor noted this place as non-essential and is in
direct violation of the governors executive order
The Water Reclamation Department elected to reopen the compost sales office, with an emphasis on
employee safety, due to its role in the biosolids disposal process, to reduce the amount of material
stockpiled on site, to restore a revenue stream for the Department, and high product demand from
essential industries. This decision was made with an effort to balance public safety, health and safety
of our workforce, as well as the continued delivery of essential services and functions on which our
citizens and customers depend. Customers including landscape contractors, residential construction
contractors, who are considered essential service providers, as well as homeowners completing
home maintenance projects utilize our Dynodirt products in the course of their business to add
nutrients to the soil and prevent erosion.
In accordance with CISA guidance, “(1) When continuous remote work is not possible, businesses should
enlist strategies to reduce the likelihood of spreading the disease. This includes, but is not necessarily
limited to, separating staff by off-setting shift hours or days and/or social distancing. These steps can
preserve the workforce and allow operations to continue, and (2) When government and businesses
engage in discussions about essential critical infrastructure workers, they need to consider the
implications of business operations beyond the jurisdiction where the asset or facility is located.
Businesses can have sizeable economic and societal impacts as well as supply chain dependencies that
are geographically distributed.”
The staff operating the sales office currently have no interaction with the public, as we have moved
to a credit/debit card only payment model for this reason. The sales personnel have be en provided
47
2
with necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) including masks, gloves, hand sanitizer, and
disinfection supplies for use during the work day. Operating procedures for interacting with
customers through the window have been implemented to eliminate direct contact.
The compost operation is currently the City’s only means of disposing of its wastewater biosolids
(sludge). 100% of the wastewater biosolids is incorporated into the compost operation, and mixed
with green waste/brush delivered to the landfill. The Department has no contracts in place for
hauling and disposal of wastewater biosolids.
The WW Reclamation management team elected to close the public facing sales office upon closure
of City facilities to the public until other arrangements could be made. During this period of closure,
staff received many calls daily from small lawn/landscape/construction businesses inquiring as to
when the sales office would reopen so they could obtain product to complete their work and remain
gainfully employed.
48
3
The following photos of the compost sales area demonstrate the physical separation of staff and the
public.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please feel free to contact me by telephone at (940)
349-8086 or by email at Frank.Pugsley@cityofdenton.com.
Sincerely,
Frank E. Pugsley, P.E.
Director, Water and Wastewater Utilities
49
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-031
INFORMAL STAFF REPORT
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Personal protective equipment (PPE) status and steps taken to reduce the spread of COVID-19
among City field workers
BACKGROUND:
There have been recent inquiries from members of the public and City Council regarding various
departments’ strategies and precautions for preventing the spread of COVID-19 among city
employees who may work in the field and in the community at large. The safety of City staff
remains the highest priority. A coordinated effort by those departments who have field workers
performing essential functions includes the implementation of new strategies and procedures to
help maintain safety levels among varying crews. The main focus of the PPE Working Group (led
by Battalion Chief Skipper, under the direction of the Fire Department’s medical director) is to
determine each City department’s PPE needs and develop recommendations and minimum
requirements based on CDC guidelines.
DISCUSSION:
The PPE Working Group will educate staff on the CDC guidelines for social distancing, the
appropriate protective gear to wear, how to properly use and dispose of gear, and when it should
be applied in a department’s working environment. Currently, there is a limited supply of PPE
within the City’s centralized warehouse, and the PPE has been prioritized to first responders. As
the additional supply arrives, the PPE will be issued to the departments for wider use. In the
meantime, employees in the field are being educated and required to maintain social distancing
and enhance sanitizing of vehicle cabs and work spaces as recommended by health officials.
The following is a summary of general guidelines provided by the Fire Department on the
recommended type of PPE to be used by our employees:
Knowing when and what Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) must be used is key to the
continued protection of all our City employees. The key to staying healthy is practicing social
distancing, greater than six (6) feet at all times and using the right level of PPE at the right time.
An N95 respirator is not required for every employee to go about their daily responsibilities. Due
to PPE shortages, the overall intent is to prevent contamination of PPE, thereby preserving the life
of each piece.
The main components of a full PPE ensemble are goggles, gloves, respirators, and gowns; there
are various types of each and they are detailed below.
50
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-031
Goggles
Make sure they seal the eyes completely. Vents or glasses are not considered full protection.
However, if nothing else is available, safety glasses are better than nothing.
Who should wear them?
o For a non-healthcare provider, safety glasses and social distancing are
sufficient for daily wear.
Gloves
There are different types of gloves. Some are approved for handling food and some are medical
grade.
Who should wear them?
o If an employee is handling money, food, or coming into close contact with
people (<6ft.), they should wear medical grade gloves. Boxes of gloves
usually read “for medical use” on them. Otherwise, any kind of glove is a
better option than no glove.
Gowns
Mainly used for healthcare providers who are in close proximity to known, or suspected, infectious
patients.
Who should wear them?
o With the current shortage, there should be no reason for someone outside of
the healthcare field to be wearing a disposable gown.
Respirators
The majority of respirators being used right now are N95, or an international equivalent. N95s, in
relation to the current pandemic, are mainly used by healthcare providers who are within six (6)
feet of a person known or suspected to have COVID-19.
Who should wear them?
o Healthcare providers, police, and other employees who cannot practice social
distance around known, or suspected, COVID patients should wear N95
respirators.
o Note: You may see KN95s. These are Chinese equivalents to N95 masks.
There are a wide variety of models and manufacturers. If you see either N95,
or KN95, then the mask provides the same level of protection.
Surgical masks
Surgical masks are not respirators and are used for daily wear by the general population. The main
difference is that N95s protect the wearer. Surgical masks provide minimal protection, but they do
help stop the spread of the virus to others.
Who should wear them?
o Currently, the CDC is recommending everyone wear a cloth or surgical mask
and practice social distancing. This is the best way to fight the current
pandemic. Employees who are not directly treating patients who are known or
suspected COVID-19 positive should wear cloth or surgical masks.
51
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-031
The following is a summary of various departments’ strategies for mitigation and social
distancing as it relates to the City’s COVID-19 response.
Denton Municipal Electric (DME)
Beginning March 18, only essential personnel were allowed to remain onsite in response to the
COVID‐19 pandemic. All non‐essential personnel are working remotely and remain available.
Operational field crews were limited to a single crew to concentrate on maintenance only, but
additional crews may be dispatched directly from home as the need arises. Similar to public safety
protocols, all DME buildings have been locked down with a single point of entry and accessible
only to essential personnel assigned to that building. Additionally, essential personnel coming on
shift must respond to three (3) general health questions and are also required to have a temperature
screening or attest that they have completed a temperature check at home. DME management are
still trying to secure enough thermometers to place at each building. To that end, DME has assigned
a safety specialist to serve on a PPE working group assembled by public safety. That staff member
is tasked with ensuring DME has any recommended PPE and to also advise senior management
on any changes to safety protocols and measures.
In response to increases in service requests and the possibility of a full return to work for essential
operational field crews in the near future, DME has recently implemented additional measures to
be observed by staff. These measures include staggered shifts, limiting number of staff in a single
vehicle, increased cleaning in common areas and restrooms, and ensuring adequate PPE is made
available. The required use of masks has not been implemented at this time, but DME will respond
accordingly as the public safety PPE working group makes those recommendations. It should be
noted that due to the nature of some operations by DME crews, social distancing may be a
challenge, but they are committed to ensuring their staff are protected and provided necessary PPE
to complete their tasks.
Water Utilities
The Water Utilities Departments have implemented social distancing guidelines for staff including
having only one (1) person per vehicle, sanitizing vehicles, equipment and shared workspaces at
the beginning and end of each shift or when the operator changes. Workers are being called in
from “at home” shifts on an as-needed basis. As the departments are unable to procure
thermometers to check employee temperatures at work, those who own personal thermometers are
asked to check and report their temperature to their supervisor upon arriving to work. These
departments do not have frequent interaction with the public.
The public compost (Dyno Dirt) sales office has more interaction with the public, it has moved to
a credit card only payment system where staff have no physical contact with the public, as it is
now separated by a closed window. There is one employee handling transactions at the sales office;
the employee has been provided with gloves, masks, hand sanitizer, and disinfectant as an added
precaution. All employees across the departments have access to a limited supply of gloves, hand
sanitizer (when available) and disinfectant solution.
52
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-031
Parks Maintenance
Parks Maintenance employees are being provided gloves, masks, and safety glasses. They are also
requested to wear long pants and long sleeve shirts as they report for duty. Additionally, staff are
being asked to change clothes before and after each work shift. Staff are requested to take and
report their temperature before arriving for each shift. Each employee has been assigned to their
own vehicle so that there is only one employee per vehicle and social distancing may be
maintained. Employees are also reporting to work in alternate locations to reduce the number of
employees gathered at any given time. Currently, they report to the Service Center, Denia Park,
North Lakes Park, Storage Building, Green House, and Civic Center Pool.
Streets and Drainage
While major construction projects have been put on hold, Streets staff are completing the work to
a passable and safe state before a project is completely suspended. Both Streets and Drainage staff
are currently divided into two groups who alternate weeks working on site. They practice and keep
social distancing guidelines while working and commuting to and from job sites by having only
one employee per vehicle. Staff has been supplied with cleaning wipes and disinfectant spray for
each vehicle and are directed to wipe and spray down vehicles at the beginning and end of each
day. Daily temperature screening of employees is under implementation as of this week.
Community Development and Community Improvement Services
Community Improvement Services staff have been divided into two working groups who report to
the office every other day and/or as needed in order to reduce the number of staff coming in and
out every day. It is understood that staff at home may be deployed from home for field inspection
as needed. A change in procedure was also implemented in their routine to comply with social
distancing guidelines as well. CIS Officers no longer leave notices on doors or knock on doors to
speak with residents directly. Enforcement communication has been routed to email or phone
communication only.
All but two (2) Community Development staff are working remotely. One staff member does field
work and works in the office. The other staff member is on an A/B schedule in the office and other
times, as needed. The Residential Construction Specialist (RCS) completes visual inspections of
projects when workers are not present or from a distance. The RCS does not enter any occupied
home for projects, repair needs assessment, or inspections. Programmatic changes include
Partner agencies/Clients return documents electronically, and only emergency repairs are being
addressed at this time. Health self-assessments and social distancing strategies are being utilized
in attempts to maintain the safety of the teams.
Solid Waste and Recycling
Solid Waste and Recycling is using its equipment to distance and protect its employees in response
to COVID-19 protocols. Drivers and operators are limited to one person per vehicle. Employees
who are assigned routes drive the same vehicle daily while drivers who work shifts and trade out
equipment disinfect the cab at the start and end of their shifts. Staff maintain at least a six-foot
distance between themselves and the general public.
53
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-031
Morning huddles among crews have shifted to an electronic format. Staff are now dismissed upon
completion of their shifts so that they do not gather en masse awaiting scan-out time.
The Landfill Scale House has switched to an account or credit/debit only-based payment to further
separate customers from staff and to maintain social distancing standards.
Building Safety
Building Safety staff’s PPE currently consists of gloves and hand sanitizer. They are utilizing self-
acquired or self-made face masks at this point. Staff found other types for purchase on April 9
along with safety goggles. As with most departments, Building and Health Inspectors are now
working A/B shifts in weekly cycles. The on-duty shift employees are working from their work
vehicles.
One new programmatic adjustment recently implemented is virtual inspections. They are currently
only available on limited types of inspections at this time.
Staff have received PPE training from Captain Skipper in the Fire Department and subsequently
conducted training for all Building Safety staff via Teams Meeting.
CONCLUSION:
Staff will continue to monitor reports and data on the COVID-19 response at federal, state, and
local levels. Information regarding the City’s response changes rapidly, and as changes are made
to policy and procedure, they will be relayed to staff.
STAFF CONTACT:
Rachel Balthrop Mendoza
Assistant to the City Manager
Rachel.Mendoza@cityofdenton.com
(940) 349-8420
54
Date: April 19, 2020 Report No. 2020-032
INFORMAL STAFF REPORT
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
FY 2019-20 Denton Energy Center (DEC) YTD February 2020 Dashboard
BACKGROUND:
Attached is the February 2020 FY 2019-20 Dashboard for the Denton Energy Center. The
dashboard is intended to give a snapshot of relevant DEC metrics. The dashboard highlights the
following:
The Emission Chart (based on calendar year) displays the February engine runtime hours,
starts, stops, monthly and annual emissions totals and limits.
DEC MWh Generation and Gross Revenue for FY 2019-20 through February 2020.
o The DEC ran 21,499 MWh less through February of FY 2019-20 compared to FY
2018-19. This resulted in $1.1 Million less in DEC Revenue.
A DEC financial summary showing February FY 2018-19 Actuals, FY 2019-20 Budget,
Actuals as of February 2020 and the FY2019-20 end of year projections.
o The FY 2019-20 year-end projections have been updated to show a 13% increase
in MWh generation and $/MWh, resulting in a $7 Million increase in DEC
Revenue. Projected fuel cost are $510,000 lower than budgeted.
The Plant Monthly Run Hour Comparison Graph illustrates the monthly plant run times.
The Key Trends section explains variances in revenues and expenses.
o Due to running fewer hours through February, fuel cost was approximately $1.2
Million lower.
o The DEC Net Income was ($5.08) which is expected for the first five months of
the fiscal year.
o The DEC Gross Margin was $3 Million which is $2.1 Million higher than
budgeted due to higher DEC Revenue in October and November. (The Gross
Margin = DEC Revenue – Fuel cost –Variable Operating & Maintenance cost.)
Gross Margin represents the component of revenue available to pay fixed cost
including debt.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Denton Energy Center (DEC) Dashboard
STAFF CONTACTS:
Antonio Puente, Jr.
CFO/DME General Manager
(940) 349-8487
antonio.puente@cityofdenton.com
Nick Vincent
Assistant Director of Finance
(940) 349-8063
nicholas.vincent@cityofdenton.com
55
City of Denton, Texas
FY 2019-20 Denton Energy Center
YTD February 2020 Dashboard
Key Trends
For the first five months of FY 2019-20, the DEC produced 21,499 MWh less than the same period of FY 2018-19. This
resulted in approximately $1.1 Million less in revenues and $2.6 Million more in total expenses for the same time period.
This increase was due to the annual debt service payment increasing from $10 M to $18 M in FY 19-20. As of February 29,
2020, expenditures exceed revenues by $5.1 Million which is expected for this period of the fiscal year.
Through February 2020 the DEC Gross Margin was $3 Million which is $2.1 Million higher than budgeted for the same
period (Gross Margin = DEC Revenue –Fuel Cost –Variable Operating & Maintenance Cost). This is due to higher revenue
in October and November than anticipated.
Updates in the DEC Revenue and Energy Expenses improved the FY 2019-20 year-end projections to show a $(1.4) Million
Net Income compared to the $(8.95) Million Net Income shown in the FY 2019-20 budget..
Note: All dollar figures presented are in million of dollars.
Description
Engine
Runtime
(hours)
Hot
Starts
Warm
Starts
Cold
Starts Stops Description
Nitrogen
Oxides
(NOx)
Carbon
Monoxide
(CO)
Volatile
Organic
Compound
(VOC)
Particulate
Matter<10
microns
(PM10)
Particulate
Matter<2.5
microns
(PM2.5)
Sulphur
Dioxide
(SO2)
Ammonia
(NH3)
Carbon
Dioxide
Equivalents
(CO2e)
DEC Monthly Emissions Total (tons)1.83 1.81 1.36 0.79 0.79 0.02 0.13 4,696.00
DEC Annual Permit Limit Operations (tons)*29.78 93.52 48.16 69.72 69.72 1.45 60.90
Monthly Plant Emissions per DEC Permit Limit 6.15% 1.94% 2.83% 1.14% 1.14% 1.15% 0.21%
Annual to Date Plant Emissions per DEC Permit Limit 10.20% 3.20% 4.30% 1.60% 1.60% 1.70% 0.30%
*Operations Annual Limit accounts for Balance of Plant standard emissions
Emissions
February 2020
Engines (1-12)
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2019-20 FY 2019-20
YTD ACTUALS **BUDGET YTD PROJECTION
DEC REVENUE* 5.36$ 25.07$ 4.24$ 32.09$
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Energy Expense - Fuel 2.32$ 12.48$ 1.14$ 11.97$
Personal Services 0.63 2.22 0.72 2.22
Materials & Supplies 0.10 0.44 0.13 0.44
Maintenance & Repair 0.04 0.56 0.01 0.56
Insurance 0.01 0.50 0.01 0.50
Miscellaneous ----
Operations 0.09 0.48 0.09 0.48
Debt Service - Principal 1.79 7.47 3.08 7.47
Debt Service - Interest 1.68 9.80 4.12 9.80
Interfund Transfers - 0.05 0.02 0.05
Transfer to Capital Projects - 0.02 - 0.02
DEC EXPENDITURES 6.66$ 34.02$ 9.32$ 33.51$
-$ -$ -$ -$
DEC NET INCOME (1.30)$ (8.95)$ (5.08)$ (1.42)$
*Preliminary, Unaudited Figures
** Represents same period (5 months) as FY 2019-20 YTD for comparison purposes.
Total Net Income for FY 2018-19 was $14.22 M.
Month Revenue MWh $/MWh
Oct-19 $2,043,727 16,344 $125.04
Nov-19 $1,152,356 16,168 $71.27
Dec-19 $126,950 2,159 $58.80
Jan-20 $239,366 2,671 $89.62
Feb-20 $676,548 9,466 $71.47
Total FY 2019-20 $4,238,947 46,808 $90.56
Generation & Gross Revenues
56
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-033
INFORMAL STAFF REPORT
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Windhaven (Split Rock Drive) Transmission Pole
BACKGROUND:
A potential violation of the National Electric Safety Code (NESC) for clearance has been
documented along the 138 kV transmission line through the Windhaven subdivision in Southeast
Denton. On February 18, 2020 the Denton City Council received a work session presentation
from Denton Municipal Electric (DME) on the situation and provided staff with direction to
proceed with the installation of a single transmission pole to abate the violation. However,
Council also requested additional clarification on certain survey discrepancies before installing
the new transmission pole. Staff provided the requested survey information to Council on March
3, 2020. Council’s direction was unchanged. Subsequent to the March 3, 2020 work session, the
home owner corresponded with Council suggesting that DME pursue an alternative to
installation
DISCUSSION:
Homeowners of the affected residence on Split Rock Drive provided an email to Council
members suggesting that DME perform more accurate survey data and consider removal of part
of the awning of their home in order to achieve the required NESC clearances. DME did a
preliminary assessment of this potential option and has rejected it for the following reasons:
1. The prior work to determine the distances from the line to home was done by our
surveyors using very accurate measurement techniques that limit error to within two
inches. Thus, no need for further surveying work.
2. The corner of the second floor of the home would need to be modified by at least 3 feet
which is more than the dimension of the eave of the house. This would require structural
engineering of the load bearing walls that would require modification, architectural work,
permitting, contracting, etc. Costs would be a minimum $30,000 and more likely in
the $50,000 range.
3. The reduction in square footage and visual impairment to the home would likely reduce
the homes’ value, despite the investment to make the changes and thus the homeowner
would be trading off perceived reduced value from the new pole (alleged reduction in
home value) with reduced home value due to the modifications necessary.
4. The NESC minimum clearance requirements are just that, MINIMUM. The standards
state that the operator of the transmission system shall “determine any additional required
safety buffer”. If the home were modified to address the minimum clearance standard, it
leaves no safety buffer. Raising the line provides what DME considers an acceptable
safety buffer.
a. The aluminum gutters on the home are seamless and in the event they are ever
removed from the home, it is not unrealistic to be concerned that the 30-foot
57
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-033
aluminum gutter could be caught by the wind or inadvertently moved in contact
with the 138,000 volt line. The single pole option raises the line sufficiently high
enough to mitigate this potential.
b. Even if the home were modified to achieve the clearance requirements, erecting a
ladder to access the roof of the front porch or the second floor would place the
ladder and the person on the ladder inside the minimum clearance requirement
and poses risk of personal injury should the ladder fail or if the individual on the
ladder is carrying anything that is conductive.
The pole construction must be completed and the circuit re-energized prior to May 15th to
comply with ERCOT restriction on transmission outage during high demand periods. The
outage must be pre-scheduled with ERCOT to ensure that other scheduled system outages don’t
impact the reliability of the grid. DME does not have the equipment to erect the new pole and
must contract the work. The work must be scheduled as soon as possible to ensure that the
foundations, pole erection, line transfer and outage can be concluded by May 15, 2020.
Additionally, the recently passed HB 4150 requires owners of transmission and distribution lines
to certify compliance with the NESC clearance standards on May 1, 2020. As the owner of the
line, TMPA will have to report the non-compliance and the mitigation plan to the Public Utility
Commission of Texas (PUCT) by May 1. If the work can be completed by that time, the
certification can be made without contingency or exception.
Discussion with the homeowner indicates that the proposed location of the new transmission
pole will not interfere with the existing gate that opens onto the easement.
DME ACTIONS:
DME will immediately begin scheduling the work with our contractor and once a schedule has
been finalized with both the contractor and ERCOT, we will inform the homeowner of when the
work will begin.
STAFF CONTACT:
Terry Naulty
Assistant General Manager
Denton Municipal Electric
Terry.naulty@cityofdenton.com
(812) 972-1457 mobile
58
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-034
INFORMAL STAFF REPORT
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Urban Forest Master Plan Update.
BACKGROUND:
The Denton Plan 2030, recommends the development of an Urban Forest Master Plan (UFMP)
to identify important tree canopy resources and include specific strategies for protection and
provisions of a more robust tree canopy. The UFMP will build on the broad goals and policies in
the Denton Plan 2030 to use an integrative approach to environmental management to create
local land conservation strategies tailored to protect Denton’s water, air, ecosystems, and natural
character.
The UFMP provides a shared vision for the future of the urban forest to inspire and engage
stakeholders, both internally and externally, in the care, management, and protection of Denton’s
urban forest. The UFMP serves as a guide for managing, enhancing, and growing Denton’s
urban forest and the community tree resource over the next 20 years. While the primary focus of
the UFMP is on the stewardship of the community tree resource, it also considers private trees as
they contribute significantly to Denton’s livability and environmental quality.
While the City has completed urban tree canopy assessments and an i-Tree Eco assessment in the
past, the UFMP is a first for Denton and complements the Denton 2030 Plan, the Parks,
Recreation Master Plan, and the Sustainable Denton Plan. The plan is the second in the DFW
Metroplex behind Plano, although Dallas is currently also developing a plan. Other cities that
have Urban Forrest Master Plans are Austin, TX; Charlotte, NC; Minneapolis, MN; Portland,
OR; Sacramento, CA; Seattle, WA, and Washington DC. American Forest recognizes all of these
cities as one of the ten best U.S. cities for urban forests.
CONCLUSION:
The Urban Forest Master plan lays the groundwork for a more holistic approach to managing
Denton’s urban forest. The Parks, Recreation and Beautification Board approved the plan after
seeing the presentation on February 2, 2020. A draft of the UFMP is provided and will be
presented to City Council for consideration on a date to be determined.
STAFF CONTACT:
Haywood Morgan
Urban Forester, Parks and Recreation
Haywood.Morgan@cityofdenton.com
REQUESTOR:
Staff Initiated
59
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-034
PARTICIPATING DEPARTMENTS:
Parks and Recreation Department
STAFF TIME TO COMPLETE REPORT:
Parks and Recreation Department 3 hours
60
URBAN
FOREST
MASTER
PLAN
THE
CITY
OF
TEXAS
1 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
61
The planting of a tree, especially one of the
long-living hardwood trees, is a gift which you
can make to posterity at almost no cost and
with almost no trouble, and if the tree takes
root it will far outlive the visible effect of any
of your other actions, good or evil.
GEORGE ORWELL
62
Texas Urban Forest Master Plan 3
PREPARED BY:
Davey Resource Group, Inc.
1500 NORTH MANTUA STREET
KENT, OH 44240
DAVEYRESOURCEGROUP.COM
PREPARED FOR:
City of Denton
901-B TEXAS STREET
DENTON, TX 76209
CITYOFDENTON.COM
TEXAS
63
Mayor and City Council
Mayor Chris Watts
Gerard Hudspeth,
Mayor Pro Tem/District 1
Keely G. Briggs,
District 2
Jesse Davis,
District 3
John Ryan, District 4
Deb Armintor,
At Large Place 5
Paul Meltzer,
At Large Place 6
City Administration
Todd Hileman,
City Manager
Mario Canizares,
Deputy City Manager
Sara Hensley,
Assistant City Manager
Acknowledgments
City of Denton City Council
City of Denton City Staff
Photo Credits: City of Denton
Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc.
Special thanks to Community Participants
Davey Resource Group, Inc.
Urban Forest Master Plan
64
Parks, Recreation & Beatification Board
Frances Punch,
Chair – Council Place 7
Denona Lee,
Council Place 1
Kent Boring,
Council Place 2
Alana Presley Taylor,
Council Place 3
David Shuck,
Council Place 4
George Ferrie,
Council Place 5
James Emerich,
Council Place 6
Parks and Recreation
Gary Packan,
Director of Parks & Recreation
Laura Behrens,
Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation
Drew Huffman,
Parks Superintendent
Haywood Morgan, Jr.,
Urban Forester
Russel Koch,
Parks Manager
Craig Arrington,
Parks Manager
Marshall McGee,
Parks Field Supervisor
Teresa Abrams,
formerly Parks Field Supervisor
City Staff
Josh Mullen,
Fire/Community Services
Lancine Bentley,
Fire/Community Services
Pam Alumm,
Engineering-Transportation
Marc Oliphant,
Engineering Transportation
Daniel Kremer,
Public Works-Streets and Drainage
Clark Rosendahl,
Public Works-Streets and Drainage
Keith Gabbard,
formerly Public Works-Streets and Drainage
Tracy Beck,
Engineering-CIP
Doug Breon,
Denton Municipal Electric
Bradley Watts,
Denton Municipal Electric
Daniel Howington,
Denton Municipal Electric
Billy Ewton,
Development Services/Bldg Inspections
Sean Jacobson,
Development Services/Planning
Karina Maldonado,
formerly Development Services/Planning
Carly Weld,
Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc.
Autumn Natalie,
Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc.
Julie Anderson,
formerly Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc.
City Staff (continued)
Sarah Luxton,
Water Utilities
Joetta Dailey,
Water Utilities/Environmental Services
Deborah Viera,
Water Utilities/Environmental Services
Christi Upton,
Water Utilities/Environmental Services
Brian Boerner,
Solid Waste
Sarah Kuechler,
Public Affairs
Ryan Adams,
Public Affairs
Community Stakeholders
Christa Crowe,
Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc. Board
David W. Lehde,
Dallas Home Builders Association
Lee Allison,
Denton Community Developers Alliance
Matt Grubishich,
Texas Trees Foundation
Micah Pace,
Preservation Tree Services
Special Thanks to Community Participants
Acknowledgments 5Texas
65
Scope & Purpose
The Urban Forest Master Plan (UFMP) serves as a
guide for managing, enhancing, and growing Denton’s
urban forest and the community tree resource over the
next 20 years. Whereas the urban forest includes all of
the trees and woody shrubs in Denton, the community
tree resource is comprised of publicly managed trees
along streets, in parks, and at City facilities. While
the Plan is primarily focused on the stewardship of
the community tree resource, the Plan also considers
private trees because they contribute significantly to
Denton’s livability and environmental quality.
In summary, the Plan aims to:
• Recognize best management practices that
promote tree health, maximum benefits, and
community safety
• Promote community outreach, engagement, and
advocacy for the urban forest
• Develop a more cohesive organizational structure
to facilitate collaboration among all departments
and staff who impact or affect the urban forest
• Nurture an ethic of stewardship for the urban
forest among City staff, community organizations,
businesses, and residents
• Increase health and resiliency in the urban forest
by improving species diversity and by managing
pests and invasive species
• Establish baseline metrics and clear goals
for urban forest managers
The Plan includes short-term actions and long-range
planning goals to promote sustainability, species
diversity, and greater canopy cover. The Plan suggests
reasonable time frames for achieving goals, based on
available resources and community support.
Urban Forest Master Plan
66
Table of Contents 7
• SCOPE & PURPOSE
• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
What Do We Have?
What Do We Want?
How Do We Get There?
How Are We Doing?
• INTRODUCTION
Community
History of Denton
Tree and Canopy Benefits
Air Quality
Carbon Dioxide Reduction
Stormwater Management & Water Quality
Energy Savings
Health, Aesthetic, & Socioeconomic Benefits
Wildlife
Calculating Tree Benefits
WHAT DO WE HAVE?
History of Urban Forestry in Denton
Post Oaks and Development
Wildfire
Urban Forest Resource
Tree Canopy
The Urban Forest Program
Services
Program Funding
Summary of Annual Funding
Tree Fund
Regulations and Policies
Federal and State Law
Denton Municipal Code
2012 Simply Sustainable Denton
Denton Plan 2030
Denton Mobility Plan – 2012 Denton Bike Plan
Denton Parks, Recreation and Trails Master Plan
Denton Municipal Electric Brochure
Conclusion
WHAT DO WE WANT?
Managing Partners
Community Partners
Community Meeting
Plan, Goals, and Actions
Focus Area: A safe and healthy urban forest
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
Focus Area: Engage the community to ensure
the future of the urban forest
HOW DO WE GET THERE?
Focus Area: A safe and healthy urban forest
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
Focus Area: Engage the community to ensure
the future of the urban forest
HOW ARE WE DOING?
Monitoring
Annual Plan Review
Resource Analysis
Canopy Analysis
Community Satisfaction
Reporting
State of the Urban Forest Report
APPENDICES
Appendix A: References
Appendix B: Acronyms
Appendix C: Industry Standards
Appendix D: Soil Volume & Tree Stature
Appendix E: Alternative Planter Designs
6 16
31
36
60
61
8
10
Table of Contents
Texas
67
How are
we doing?
What do
we want?
What do
we have?
How do
we get there?
What Do We Have?
The plan development process involved a
comprehensive review and assessment of
the existing urban forest resource, including
composition, value, and environmental benefits
(Table 1). The process explored community values
and vision, including those expressed in guiding
documents, including the Denton Plan 2030,
Denton Mobility Plan, Simply Sustainable Plan,
City Ordinance, state law, and other regulatory
and policy documents.
The process evaluated funding for current service
levels, including programs coordinated by local
nonprofit organization Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc.
(KDB). In addition to Park Staff, there are multiple
stakeholders, internal and external, who play a
role in the planning, design, care, and advocacy
of the urban forest. These stakeholders include
City departments, utility providers, nonprofit
organizations, Denton County, the Texas Trees
Foundation, Denton Community Development
Alliance, the Dallas Builders Association, and
community members. Each of these stakeholders
played a role and provided input for the
development of this Plan.
Denton’s Urban Forester works closely with
other City departments to protect, preserve, and
manage the City’s trees. Trees in parks, around
City facilities, and along some arterial roadways
are maintained by park staff and contracted crews
as needed. Park staff provide clearance, visibility
pruning, and emergency response on a reactive
basis. Contractors are generally used for larger
trees and unique situations. A newly revised and
adopted Denton Development Code, promotes
the inclusion of trees into new development to
encourage the expansion of tree canopy. Tree
canopy cover goals are relative to zoning and
range from 40% to 50% in residential areas and
15% to 20% in industrial areas. Additionally, the
Denton Development Code established the Tree
Fund which has contributed to the purchase of
land to preserve existing stands of trees and new
tree plantings. The partnership with KDB has kept
a long-standing tradition of celebrating Denton as
the “Redbud Capital of Texas” and Arbor Day alive
through community-wide tree planting events and
tree giveaways, which have resulted in the planting
of more than 7,000 trees since 2016.
With the support of City Council, KDB, and a
dedicated Urban Forester, Denton is poised to
develop a comprehensive urban forestry program
that ensures community vision for a healthy,
aesthetically pleasing, and environmentally
beneficial urban forest.
What Do We Want?
The review process identified challenges and
opportunities for Denton’s urban forest. One of
the biggest threats to trees in Denton is ongoing
development and the loss of large, mature trees to
make room for new buildings and infrastructure.
Denton’s urban forest includes an estimated 3.5
million trees that contribute greatly to the aesthetics
of the community. The urban forest also provides
valuable and critical services to the community
including benefits to air quality, carbon dioxide
reductions, water quality, stormwater management,
energy savings, health benefits, and wildlife habitat,
and socioeconomics. The Urban Forest Master Plan
(UFMP) is a road map which provides long-term
management goals and a timeline to effectively
preserve and enhance the environmental and
socioeconomic benefits provided by this critical
component of infrastructure.
The Plan’s structure is based on the understanding
of what we have, what we want, how we get there,
and how we are doing. This structure is known as
adaptive management, which is commonly used
for resource planning and management (Miller,
1988) and provides a good conceptual framework
for the process of improving urban forest
management.
Executive Summary
8 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
68
Executive Summary 9
and increased monitoring and proactive risk
management when they become mature. Deferring
maintenance at any stage can have a significant
effect on the overall health, structure, value, and
lifespan of a tree. In addition, deferred maintenance
often results in higher costs and less beneficial
results, including increased risk potential. As a
result, the Plan identifies goals and actions for
optimizing urban forest programming, existing
funding, staffing, and urban forest policy.
How Do We Get There?
The Plan identifies three focus areas and nine
goals for preserving the health, value, services,
and sustainability of Denton’s urban forest. Each
of these goals is supported by comprehensive
objectives and actions. Recognizing that
community engagement is integral to success,
the Plan includes firm objectives for engaging
the community and encourages partnership and
collaboration.
How Are We Doing?
The long-term success of the Plan will be
measured through the realization of Plan goals
and demonstrated through increased value and
environmental services from the urban forest. The
Plan identifies methods of measurement, priorities,
potential partners, and estimated costs. Since
the Plan is intended to be a dynamic tool, it can
and should be updated in response to available
resources and opportunities. One of the greatest
measures of success for the Plan will be its level
of success in meeting community expectations for
the care and preservation of Denton’s urban forest.
In addition to removal of existing trees, the
construction process can be detrimental to soil,
through compaction and removal or redistribution
of topsoil. The loss of organic matter and soil
structure can precipitate a decline in existing
trees, especially native oak species, and negatively
impact new tree establishment and mortality rates.
Many of the species that have been historically
successful in the region are no longer thriving
in urbanized locations. Currently, Denton has
an average canopy cover of 27.9% (2016 State
of Denton Urban Forest Report). A focus on the
preservation of existing mature trees and canopy
will help to ensure that the community continues
to receive a stable flow of benefits from the urban
forest resource.
In neighborhood areas, the City currently does
not provide maintenance to public trees in the
right-of-way (ROW). The Denton Development
Code mandates that property owners adjacent to
ROW trees are responsible for their maintenance
including pruning for clearance and visibility,
irrigating, and removal. Because most homeowners
are unaware and/or do not have the resources to
employ best management practices for tree care,
the result of this policy is that this vital public
resource is subjected to various levels of tree care
that often lead to poor tree health and structure
as well as risk to people and property. The plan
development process identified an opportunity to
explore the costs and benefits of having the City
assume responsibility and maintenance for all
public trees.
Trees are living organisms, constantly changing
and adapting to their environment and increasing
in size over time. Because of this, trees have
specific needs at various life stages, including
training for proper structure when they are young
$1.3 MILLION
2
Denton’s Urban Forest Benchmark Values
URBAN TREE CANOPY COVER (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, 2016)
URBAN FOREST RESOURCE (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, 2016)
Annual Canopy Benefits (Public and Private, 2016)
Overall Canopy Cover 28%1
Estimated Total Number of Trees 3.5 MILLION TREES
Annual Carbon Sequestration 23,000 TONS $3.1 MILLION
Impervious Surfaces 45%
Replacement Value $344 MILLION
Annual Air Quality 404.9 TONS $759,000
Canopy Benefits (Public and Private, 2016)
Unique Species 46
Annual Stormwater 151.1 MILLION GALLONS
Carbon Stored to Date 458,000 $61 MILLION
Prevalence of Top Ten Species 82%
Number of Species Exceeding 10%2
Annual Energy $1.6 MILLION
1 Adjusted by City Staff from the State of the Denton Urban Forest Report, 2016.
Table 1: Urban Forest Benchmark Values
$1.3 MILLION
Texas
69
Goal 1: Efficiently manage the community tree resource.
Goal 2: Promote tree health and good structure.
Goal 3: Mitigate and reduce risk of wildfire.
A safe and healthy
urban forest
Primary Objectives:
• Improve understanding of the structure and composition of
Denton’s community tree resource.
• Following completion of a tree inventory, develop pruning and
maintenance cycles.
• Continue to use planting funds successfully.
• Explore the feasibility of the City taking responsibility for the
maintenance of community trees in neighborhoods.
• Revise policies and standards for pruning young trees to
promote healthy growth and structure.
• Ensure community trees are maintained according to industry
standards to promote tree health, longevity, and also public safety.
• Contribute to a fire safe community.
Goal 4: Recognize trees as green infrastructure.
Goal 5: Promote tree preservation and protection.
Goal 6: Develop a City-wide planting plan.
Goal 7: Adopt Plant Health Care (PHC) policies.
Sustain
environmental benefits
Primary Objectives:
• Minimize the encroachment of other utilities.
• Develop maintenance and design strategies for mitigating
conflict with otherwise healthy trees.
• Ensure design standards adequately consider trees.
• Revise and amend the Code of Ordinances to promote
the protection of community trees.
• Continue to contribute mitigation fees to the Tree Fund.
• Mitigate the impacts of development on native post oak
stands.
• Educate the community about their role in maintaining
a safe urban forest.
• Achieve 40% canopy cover by 2040.
• Promote species diversity in the urban forest.
• Encourage equitable distribution of tree canopy across the City.
• Set emphasis on planting the right tree in the right place.
• Encourage the expansion of the urban forest through tree
plantings on private property.
• Support stormwater management through the strategic
growth of canopy.
• Monitor invasive species.
Goal 8: Support community engagement and stewardship
of the urban forest.
Goal 9: Celebrate the importance of urban trees.
Engage the community to ensure
the future of the urban forest
Primary Objectives:
• Develop and maintain a web page for the Urban Forestry
Division on the City website.
• Interact with community members through a variety of outlets.
• Maintain Tree City USA.
Urban Forest Master Plan Focus Areas
10 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
70
Introduction
Denton’s humid subtropical climate is characterized
by high temperatures and consistent rainfall
throughout the year (Denton, Texas, 2019). On
average, Denton experiences summer highs of 96°F
and average winter lows of 33°F. The average annual
precipitation is 38.1 inches (U.S. Climate Data, 2019).
Denton is located on the southern edge of “Tornado
Alley” and occasionally experiences tornadoes.
Other extreme weather events such as hail and
flash flooding are more common occurrences.
Community
The Redbud Capital of Texas, Denton is located
on the northern edge of the Dallas-Fort Worth
Metroplex. Standing prominently on Hickory
Street, the Denton County Courthouse reflects the
essence that is Denton; balancing the demands of
urbanization with preservation of the past.
History of Denton
The Wichita, Comanche, Kiowa, and Caddo tribes are
the first known people to call the area that is now
Denton “home”. Archaeologists have determined that
native peoples have been a part of North Texas for
thousands of years prior to the arrival of the Spanish
Conquistadors (Cochran, 2013).
1800 s
Following the Texas’ declaration of Independence
from Mexico in 1836, there were not permanent
settlers. The first settlers of present-day Denton
settled about a mile southeast of the present-day
town center along the Pecan Creek and named the
settlement Pinckneyville in honor of Texas’s first
governor, James Pinckney Henderson (Cochran,
2013; Adopt a Town: Pinckneyville (Denton)).
Historians dispute whether a courthouse was ever
built in Pinckneyville; however, some accounts
suggest that court was held under a large oak tree
(Cochran, 2013).
In 1857, as a result of the donation of 100 acres
of land and requests from county residents for
a more centralized location, Denton became the
county seat for Denton County (Cochran, 2013).
Both the City and the County were named in honor
of John B. Denton (a preacher, lawyer and Texas
militia captain) among the earliest settlers in the
area (Bates, 1918). Additionally, many of the original
street names were based on the trees native to the
county (Denton Landmark Commission).
Before and after the Civil War, Denton remained a
small subsistence agricultural community. In 1881,
Denton experienced some growth with the arrival
of the Texas and Pacific Railway. Without an east-
west connection, there was no further expansion of
the town, which kept Denton a small railroad town
(Odom, 1991).
1900 s
By the beginning of the 20th century, both North
Texas Normal College (now the University of North
Texas) and the Girl’s Industrial College (now Texas
Woman’s University) were established. Both of
these colleges greatly contributed to the character
of Denton that remains to this day (Odom, 2019).
In fact, Denton’s annual Redbud Festival is rooted
in the Texas Woman’s University festival which
celebrated campus beautification and tree
plantings from 1930 to 1984.
Population growth was moderate until the 1960’s.
It then majorly increased with the construction
of I35-E and I-35W connections to the Dallas-
Fort Worth Metroplex. The building of Dallas/
Fort Worth International Airport in 1974 further
contributed to the population expansion of
Denton. Larger manufacturing companies began
establishing themselves through the 1990’s when
the population had reached 80,537 (Odom, 1991).
Like many other cities in the 21st century, a
renewed interest in urban revitalization began
to shape some of the historic downtown by
preserving historic and cultural areas including
the Oak/Hickory Historical District (which was
designated as a historical district in 1985) (History
of Denton).
2000s
By 2000, Denton reached a population of 80,537
people according to the “Texas Almanac: City
Population History from 1850-2000”. In 2010,
Business Insider published an article rating
Denton as the Best Small Town in America due to
its friendliness, endless entertainment options,
food options, and patriotism (Berlinger, 2012). In
2018, the approximate population was 138,541
(an estimated increase of 19% from 2010) (U.S.
Census, 2019). This up-and-coming community
continues to attract development with numerous
economic opportunities, affordable housing, and
a state-of-the-art transportation system; making
it one of the fastest growing communities in the
Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex (Hill, 2015).
Affectionately called the “Lil’ d”, Denton offers easy
accessibility to the amenities of the “Big D” (Dallas).
It is often characterized as a college town with the
charm of a small town and a historic downtown.
Denton has an expansive live music scene with
a world-renowned Arts and Jazz Festival and
numerous small music venues across the City
(Discover Denton).
Denton is a community that values the environment,
which is evident through the Clear Creek Natural
Heritage Center, Denton Community Market, Shiloh
Field Community Garden, as well as involvement in
Bee City USA, Monarch City USA, and Tree City USA
national programs. Clear Creek Natural Heritage
Center is a gateway to more than 2,900 acres of
bottomland hardwood forest, upland prairie, and
diverse aquatic habitats. Located within Lake
Lewisville’s upper floodplain and managed by the
City of Denton, it provides residents and visitors with
unmatched ecological, educational, and recreational
opportunities. The Denton Community Market is
a local farmers market that operates during the
summer. Shiloh Field Community Garden, the largest
community garden in the United States, is operated
by Denton Bible Church. It encompasses 14.5 acres
with 152 plots with fruit trees, berries, chickens,
honeybees, and vineyard. It provides products to
fourteen different organizations and ministries
throughout Denton (Dallas News, 2014; Shiloh Field
Community Garden, 2019). Denton is recognized
as a (1) Bee City USA, an initiative of the Xerces
Society to raise awareness about pollinator decline
and encourage healthy habitat in urban areas (The
Xerces Society, Inc., 2018), (2) Monarch City USA,
a program lead by a non-profit to promote planting
milkweeds and nectar plants that encourage
monarch development (Monarch City USA, 2019),
and (3) Tree City USA, an initiative of the Arbor Day
Foundation to green urban areas through enhanced
tree planting and care (Arbor Day Foundation, 2019).
Introduction
Texas 11
71
Air Quality
Trees improve air quality in five (5) fundamental ways:
• Lessening particulate matter (e.g., dust and
smoke)
• Absorbing gaseous pollutants
• Providing shade and transpiring
• Reducing power plant emissions by decreasing
energy demand among buildings
• Increasing oxygen levels through
photosynthesis
Trees protect and improve air quality by
intercepting particulate matter (PM10), including
dust, pollen, and smoke. The particulates
are filtered and held in the tree canopy until
precipitation rinses the particulates harmlessly
to the ground. Trees absorb harmful gaseous
pollutants like ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2),
and sulfur dioxide (SO2). Shade and transpiration
reduce the formation of O3, which is created at
higher temperatures. Scientists are now finding
that some trees may absorb more volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) than previously thought (Karl,
2010; McPherson and Simpson, 2010). VOCs are
carbon-based particles emitted from automobile
exhaust, lawnmowers, and other human activities.
Stormwater Management &
Water Quality
Trees and forests improve and protect the quality
of surface waters, such as creeks and rivers, by
reducing the impacts of stormwater runoff through:
• Interception
• Increased soil capacity and infiltration rate
• Reduction in soil erosion
Trees intercept rainfall in their canopy, which
acts as a mini-reservoir (Xiao et al, 1998). During
storm events, this interception reduces and slows
runoff. In addition to catching stormwater, canopy
interception lessens the impact of raindrops on
barren soils. Root growth and decomposition
increase the capacity and rate of soil infiltration
by rainfall and snowmelt (Xiao et al, 1998). Each
of these processes greatly reduces the flow and
volume of stormwater runoff, avoiding erosion
and preventing sediments and other pollutants
from entering streams, rivers, and lakes. Urban
stormwater runoff is a major source of pollution
for surface waters and riparian areas, threatening
aquatic and other wildlife as well as human
populations. Requirements for stormwater
management are becoming more stringent and
costly. Reducing runoff and incorporating urban
trees in stormwater management planning
have the added benefit of reducing the cost of
stormwater management, including the expense of
constructing new facilities necessary to detain and
control stormwater as well as the cost of treatment
to remove sediment and other pollutants.
Carbon Dioxide Reduction
As environmental awareness increases,
governments are paying more attention to the
effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and
concerns about climate change. As energy from
the sun (sunlight) strikes the Earth’s surface,
it is reflected into space as infrared radiation
(heat). Greenhouse gases absorb some of
this infrared radiation and trap this heat in the
atmosphere, increasing the temperature of the
Earth’s surface. Many chemical compounds in
the Earth’s atmosphere act as GHGs, including
methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon
dioxide (CO2), water vapor, and human-made
gases/aerosols. As GHGs increase, the amount
of energy radiated back into space is reduced
and more heat is trapped in the atmosphere. An
increase in the average temperature of the earth
can result in changes in weather, sea levels, and
land use patterns, as well as localized changes
that impact the suitability of some trees and other
plant species to a specific region. In the last 150
years, since large-scale industrialization began,
the levels of some GHGs, including CO2, have
increased by 25% (Greenhouse Gases’ Effect on
the Climate, 2018).
Trees and forests reduce atmospheric carbon
dioxide CO2 in two ways:
• Directly, by reducing CO2 in the atmosphere
through growth and sequestration of CO2 in
woody and foliar biomass.
• Indirectly, by lowering the demand for
energy and reducing CO2 emissions from the
consumption of natural gas and the generation
of electric power.
Tree and Canopy
Benefits
Trees in the urban forest work continuously
to mitigate the effects of urbanization and
development as well as protect and enhance lives
within the community. Healthy trees are vigorous,
producing more leaf surface and canopy cover
area each year. The amount and distribution of
leaf surface area are the driving forces behind
the urban forest’s ability to produce services for
the community (Clark et al, 1997). Services (i.e.
benefits) include:
• Air quality improvements
• Carbon dioxide reductions
• Water quality improvements
• Energy savings
• Health, aesthetic, and socioeconomic benefits
• Wildlife
• Enhanced soil health
Introduction
If a post oak were planted near a building, in
Denton, and lived for at least 20 years, over
its lifetime it will have sequestered 849 lbs of
CO2(make subscript), intercepted 2,575 gallons of
rainfall, avoided 289 gallons of stormwater runoff,
intercepted 5.9 lbs of air pollutants, conserved
691 kWh of electricity, and reduced heating
consumption by 14 therms. -i-Tree Design
URBAN FOREST FACT
12 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
72
Introduction
Energy Savings
Urban trees and forests modify climate and
conserve energy in three principal ways:
• Producing shade for dwellings and hardscape
reduces the energy needed to cool the building
with air conditioning (Akbari et al, 1997)
• Tree canopies engage in evapotranspiration,
which leads to the release of water vapor from
tree canopies and cools the air (Lyle, 1996)
• Trees in dense arrangements may reduce mean
wind speed and solar radiation below the top
of the tree canopy by up to ~90% compared to
open areas (Heisler and DeWalle, 1988)
An urban heat island is an urban area or
metropolitan area that is significantly warmer than
its surrounding rural areas due to human activities.
Trees reduce energy use in summer by cooling the
surrounding areas. Shade from trees reduces the
amount of radiant energy absorbed and stored
by hardscapes and other impervious surfaces,
thereby reducing the heat island effect, a term that
describes the increase in urban temperatures in
relation to surrounding locations. Transpiration
releases water vapor from tree canopies, which
cools the surrounding area. Evapotranspiration,
alone or in combination with shading, can help
reduce peak summer temperatures by 2 to 9°F
(1 to 5°C) (Huang et al, 1990). The energy saving
potential of trees and other landscape vegetation
can mitigate urban heat islands directly by shading
heat-absorbing surfaces, and indirectly through
evapotranspiration cooling (McPherson, 1994).
Individual trees through transpiration have a
cooling effect equivalent to two average household
central air-conditioning units per day or 70 kWh
for every 200 L of water transpired (Ellison et al,
2017). Studies on the heat island effect show that
temperature differences of more than 9°F (5°C)
have been observed between city centers without
adequate canopy cover and more vegetated
suburban areas (Akbari et al, 1997).
Trees also reduce energy use in winter by
mitigating heat loss, where they can reduce wind
speeds by up to 50% and influence the movement
of warm air and pollutants along streets and out
of urban canyons. Urban canyons are streets
flanked by dense blocks of buildings, affecting
local conditions, such as temperature, wind, and
air quality. By reducing air movement into buildings
and against conductive surfaces (e.g., glass and
metal siding), trees reduce conductive heat loss
from buildings, translating into potential annual
heating savings of 25% (Heisler, 1986).
Three trees properly placed around the home
can save $100–$250 annually in energy costs.
Shade from trees significantly mitigates the
urban heat island effect - tree canopies provide
surface temperature reductions on wall and roof
surfaces of buildings ranging from 20-45°F and
temperatures inside parked cars can be reduced
by 45°F. Reducing energy use has the added bonus
of reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from
fossil fuel power plants.
Texas 13
73
give an additional 77 million people a 1° C (1.8° F)
reduction in maximum temperatures on hot days
(McDonald et al, 2016).
Several studies have examined the relationship
between urban forests and crime rates. Park-like
surroundings increase neighborhood safety by
relieving mental fatigue and feelings of violence
and aggression that can occur as an outcome
of fatigue (Planning the Urban Forest: Ecology,
Economy, and Community Development, 2009).
Research shows that the greener a building’s
surroundings are, the fewer total crimes. This is
true for both property crimes and violent crimes.
Landscape vegetation around buildings can
mitigate irritability, inattentiveness, and decreased
control over impulses, all of which are well
established psychological precursors to violence.
Residents who live near outdoor greenery tend to
be more familiar with nearby neighbors, socialize
more with them, and express greater feelings of
community and safety than residents lacking
nearby green spaces (Planning the Urban Forest:
Ecology, Economy, and Community Development,
2003). Public housing residents reported 25%
fewer domestic crimes when landscapes and trees
were planted near their homes (Kuo, 2001). Two
studies (one in New Haven, CT and the other in
Baltimore City and County, MD) found a correlation
between increased tree coverage and decreased
crime rates, even after adjusting for a number of
other variables, such as median household income,
level of education, and rented versus owner-
occupied housing in the neighborhoods that
were studied (Gilstad-Hayden et al, 2015; Troy
et al, 2012).
A 2010 study investigated the effects of exposure
to green space at school on the academic success
of students at 101 public high schools in southern
Michigan (Matsuoka, 2010). The study found a
positive correlation between exposure to nature
and student success measured by standardized
testing, graduation rate, percentage of student
planning to go to college, and the rate of criminal
behavior. This trend persisted after controlling
for factors such as socioeconomic status and
race or ethnicity. Conversely, views of buildings
and landscapes that lacked natural features were
negatively associated with student performance.
Health, Aesthetic, &
Socioeconomic Benefits
Exposure to nature, including trees, has a positive
impact on human health and wellness through
improvements in mental and physical health,
reductions in crime, and academic success.
A study of individuals living in 28 identical high-
rise apartment units found residents who live near
green spaces had a stronger sense of community
and improved mental health, coped better with
stress and hardship, and managed problems more
effectively than those living away from green space
(Kuo, 2001). In a greener environment, people
report fewer health complaints (including improved
mental health) and more often rate themselves as
being in good health (Sherer, 2003). Other research
has revealed lower incidence of depressive
symptoms in neighborhoods with greater access to
green space (Jennings & Gaither, 2015).
Trees shade impervious surfaces and prevent
the sun’s rays from hitting them, thus reducing
heat storage and later release, which contribute
to the urban heat island effect. Tall trees that
create a large shaded area are more useful than
short vegetation. Trees also contribute to cooler
temperatures through transpiration, increasing
latent heat storage (the sun’s energy goes to
convert water from its liquid to vapor form)
rather than increasing air temperature (sensible
heat). According to a study conducted by the
Nature Conservancy, it is estimated that trees
have the potential to reduce summer maximum
air temperatures by 0.9 to 3.6° F. Trees help to
address public health concerns for both heat and
air quality. Globally, an annual investment of $100
million in planting and maintenance costs would
Introduction
Denton
If a bald cypress were planted near a building
and lived for at least 20 years, it would have
sequestered 544 lbs of CO2(subscript).
- i-Tree Planting
URBAN FOREST FACT
14 Urban Forest Master Plan
74
Wildlife
Trees provide important habitat for birds, insects
(including bees), and other animal species. Their
greatest contributions include:
• Preservation and optimization of wildlife habitat
• Natural corridors for increased movement and
dispersal
Furthermore, trees and forest lands provide critical
habitat (for foraging, nesting, spawning, etc.) for
mammals, birds, fish, and other aquatic species.
Trees can offer pollinators a valuable source of
flowering plants. With an array of flowering trees that
provide pollen and nectar in the urban forest, bees
are provided with additional food sources. Increasing
tree species diversity and richness contributes to
greater numbers of bird species among urban bird
communities (Pena et al, 2017). Wooded streets
potentially function as movement corridors, allowing
certain species—particularly those feeding on the
ground and breeding in trees or tree holes—to fare
well by supporting alternative habitat for feeding
and nesting (Fernandez-Juricic E. 2001). Greater
tree density also contributes to bat activity in urban
environments and improves outcomes for both birds
and bats (Threlfall et al, 2016).
Restoration of urban riparian corridors and
their linkages to surrounding natural areas has
facilitated the movement of wildlife and dispersal
of flora (Dwyer et al, 1992). Usually habitat
creation and enhancement increase biodiversity
and complement other beneficial functions of the
urban forest. These findings indicate an urgent
need for conservation and restoration measures to
improve landscape connectivity, which will reduce
extinction rates and help maintain ecosystem
services (Haddad et al, 2015).
Soil Health
Urban soils are typically altered with man-made
building materials. Although tree establishment
may be difficult in highly compacted, significantly
altered, or poor soils, establishing urban trees
improves soil quality in numerous ways, including:
• Increased available carbon for microorganisms
• Increased soil microbial biomass
• Reduced erosion and greater water holding
capacity
• Enhanced soil nutrients and organic matter
• Decreased soil compaction and soil bulk density
Trees shed leaves, branches, and root materials
that subsequently decompose and incorporate
nutrients and organic matter into the soil (Oldfield et
al, 2014). Furthermore, tree root exudates aid in soil
aggregation. Not only do these processes increase
the available nutrients in the soil, but they also create
habitat for beneficial soil microbes (Grayston et al,
1997). Trees also increase water infiltration rates
of soil through rainfall interception and altering the
physical properties of the soil (Uthappa et al, 2015).
Calculating Tree Benefits
Communities can calculate the benefits of their
urban forest by using a complete inventory
or sample data in conjunction with the USDA
Forest Service i-Tree software tools. This
state-of-the-art, peer-reviewed software suite
considers regional environmental data and costs
to quantify the ecosystem services unique to a
given urban forest resource.
Individuals can calculate the benefits
of trees to their property by using i-Tree
Design. (www.itreetools.org/design)
Introduction 15Texas
75
the Initiative, to engage the community KDB offers
trees and educational programming through the
Denton Redbud Festival, Trees Mean Business,
City of Denton Tree Rebate Program, Children’s
Arbor Day, Tree Your Block, and Citizen Forester (a
volunteer training program).
The Tree Fund, established in 2004, is funded
by developers when trees are removed for
development projects, to mitigate the loss of the
tree through preservation and planting efforts
elsewhere in Denton.
To further support the urban forest, in 2008, the
first urban forester was hired for the City.
In 2015, City Council approved $350,000 for a
series of tree plantings. The plantings were so well
received by the community that the Council then
expanded the funding to allow for an additional 535
trees to be planted along existing trails and City
maintained properties (Newsletter of the ISA Texas
Chapter, 2016). As a result of these plantings the
City has received Community Forestry Awards in
2016 and 2018 from the Texas AM Forest Service
and the Texas Chapter of the International Society
of Arboriculture. In total, approximately 1,510 trees
were planted because of the increase in funding.
In 2016, the City, in partnership with Preservation
Tree, the Texas Tree Foundation and Plan-It Geo,
conducted an i-Tree Eco assessment, which
resulted in the publication of the 2016 State of
Denton Urban Forest Report.
Post Oaks & Development
Sometimes called the “Royal Oak”, this native species is the predominant species of the Dallas
Fort Worth Metropolitan Area. It was noted by early European explorers that the post oak was a
major species in the Post Oak Savannah Region of Texas (The Post Oaks, 2019). Post oak (Quercus
stellata) are a slow-growing oak which produce a dense wood, which historically has been used as
fence posts and railroad ties, hence the name (Turner, 2010).
The clay nutrient deficient soils and high heat of North Texas make the region a challenging place
for many species of trees to grow. Post oak are uniquely well-adapted to the region with heat
tolerance, low water requirements, and resistance to decay (Stransky, n.d.). Post oak trees provide
habitat for nesting birds, as well as, provide acorns, which are a valuable food source for wildlife
including wild turkey, white-tailed deer, squirrels, and other animals (Stransky, n.d.).
In Denton, post oak trees are a valued part of the urban forest. Around the year 2003, the Tree
Preservation Ordinance was established in response to the removal of mature post oak trees after
ground was broken on a new development. Following this ordinance, a tree committee was created
to be an advisory group to review ordinances.
On the University of North Texas campus there are over 3,000 post oak trees. The campus is actively
undergoing tree preservation efforts to preserve the trees (Post Oak Tree Preservation at UNT, 2018).
In recent years, there has been a notable decline of post oak, especially in urban areas, in North
Texas (Texas Agriculture Daily, 2016). Symptoms reported to Texas Extension include: rapid
chlorosis and necrosis throughout the entire crown, dead tree leaf retention, and groups of dead or
dying trees (McBride and Appel, 2019). While, the death of these trees appeared to be rapid decline,
Texas Extension believe that symptoms are likely observable months before the collapse of a tree
and suggest that numerous environmental factors are contributing to the decline, including the 2011
drought and unseasonal flooding which promotes certain outbreaks of diseases and pests, and
problems associated with urban development (McBride, 2019).
Post oak have shallow root systems which make the trees particularly sensitive to soil compaction,
drainage changes, and soil disturbance (Gilman and Watson, 1994). Construction can be especially
impactful on a root system, through excavation, compaction from heavy equipment, soil grade
changes, and drastic changes in soil drainage.
To mitigate the impact of construction activities on post oak, prevention and planning are critical
for protecting this sensitive species. For any type of construction (new sidewalks, driveways,
remodeling, updates to underground utilities, etc.), a certified arborist should be consulted during
the design and planning phases to determine whether the tree may withstand the impacts of the
given project or if alterations to design can be made to avoid impacts.
History of Urban
Forestry in Denton
Trees have always been integral to the people of
Denton. The Native Americans of the region used
the native post oak for medicinal purposes. The
acorns produced by the trees were used as a food
source (Thomas, 2009).
The 73rd Texas State Legislature designated
Denton as the “Redbud Capital of Texas” in 1993
(Texas State Library and Archives Commission,
2019). In continuation of the tradition of annual
celebrations of beautification and tree plantings set
forth by Texas Woman’s University, Keep Denton
Beautiful, Inc (KDB) began the annual Redbud
Festival. This festival is regularly celebrated on
National Arbor Day through events, workshops, and
free tree giveaways.
The City’s first Arbor Day was in 1990. In 1991
the City received the designation as a “Tree City
USA” city. Denton also received eight Tree City
USA Growth Awards for demonstrating progress
in its community forestry program, including
environmental improvements and achieving higher
levels of tree maintenance.
Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc (KDB), a nonprofit
organization that engages Dentonites in projects
which promote a beautiful and clean Denton,
founded in 1987 (State of the Denton Urban Forest
Report, 2016). The Denton Tree Initiative is among
the organization’s many community improvement
campaigns, in partnership with the City, which is
geared towards promoting the planting of trees on
private property. Since the Initiative began in 2015,
KDB has planted 1,743 trees through a partnership
with the City and community members. As part of
What do we have?
16 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
76
Wildfire
Wildfires in Texas may not garner the same media
attention that California or other western states
receive, but wildfires are not an uncommon
occurrence. As recent as 2018, according to the
Texas A&M Forest Service, 894 fires were fought
(Dawson, 2018). Drought in 2011, spurred one of
Texas’s worst years for fire, with 3,312 fires fought
by the Texas A&M Forest Service, and the infamous
Bastrop County Complex fire, the most destructive
wildfire in Texas History (Texas Parks & Wildlife,
n.d.). Denton County had a 200-acre fire flare up
in Flower Mound in 2018 but was quickly brought
under control (Associated Press & Kera News, 2018).
The occurrence of a wildfire is influenced by the
current climatic conditions (temperature, humidity,
wind) other environmental factors such as the
type of surrounding vegetation, fuel structure
and moisture content. Much of the Western
United States experiences hot, dry summers, and
communities are adjacent to forested areas that are
adapted to wildfires. The Wildland Urban Interface
(WUI) describes a transition zone where homes are
located on the edge of fire prone areas. There is an
increased risk of personal injury or property damage
resulting from a wildfire in the WUI.
Texas A&M Forest Service has an online Texas
Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal, which has
interactive mapping, which provides members
of the public to review their communities risk
of wildfire, the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)
present within their community, Wildfire Ignition
Density, and a WUI Response Index. The mapping
features indicate that Denton, like many other parts
of the state, have areas within the City limits with
heightened vulnerabilities to fire.
To have a more fire adapted community, there
must be support to locate WUI areas at risk of
wildfire and engage in risk reduction activities
(Cooke et al, 2016). In 2012, less than 10% of
communities at risk of fire had a Community
Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) in place (Jakes et
al, 2012). Whether preparing by creating a CWPP or
other community planning, the steps outlined need
to be in the context of the community, consider
the resources available, and generate a network of
support for implementation of best management
practices (Jakes et al, 2012).
To better mitigate the risk of wildfire in communities
in Texas, Texas A&M Forest Service has mitigation
and preparedness programs to educate and
assist communities on managing their wildfire risk.
Texas A&M Forest service have WUI specialist that
work with community leaders to develop detailed
Community Wildfire Protection Plans.
Drought
Drought conditions will inevitably occur in Denton.
Therefore, soil moisture should be monitored around
trees in order to ensure adequate moisture. To
support tree health, mature trees should be watered
one to two times per week in the summer depending
on the soil type (sandy soils require more frequent
watering than clay soils). Newly planted trees should
be watered more often (Clatterbuck and Tankersley,
n.d.). Every time a newly planted tree is watered, it
should receive 10-20 gallons of water depending on
the size of the root ball.
What do we have?17Texas
77
Urban Forest Resource
The development of the Plan included a review of
the 2016 State of the Denton Urban Forest Report,
which included an urban tree canopy assessment
and i-Tree Eco analysis. Both assessments included
an assessment of trees on both public and private
property, as there is no inventory of publicly
managed trees.
Tree Canopy
Tree canopy is the layer of leaves, branches, and
stems of trees and other woody plants that cover
the ground when viewed from above. Understanding
the location and extent of tree canopy is critical to
developing and implementing sound management
strategies that will promote the smart growth and
resiliency of Denton’s urban forest and the invaluable
services it provides. A tree canopy assessment
provides a bird’s-eye-view of the entire urban forest
and includes consideration of tree canopy along
with other primary land cover, including impervious
surface, bare soils, and water. This information helps
managers better understand tree canopy in relation
to other geospatial data, including:
What do we have?
Figure 1: Historic Change in Canopy Cover in Denton from 2008 to 2018
0%2008
20.4%
2014
22.6%
2018
27.9%
5%
15%
20%
25%
30%
10%
18 Urban Forest Master Plan
HISTORIC CHANGE
The State of the Denton Urban Forest report (2016)
analyzed canopy cover change between 2008
(20.4%) and 2014 (22.6%). During this time canopy
cover increased from 20% to 23%. It increased
again between 2014 and 2018 from 23% to 28%.
While the change in canopy cover suggests that
trees grew significantly over that period, much
of the changes in canopy cover are more likely
attributed to the annexation of forested land
within the City. Development continues to threaten
existing trees and has reduced the overall canopy
cover in the developed areas of the City. Growth of
tree canopy cover will likely be unable to keep up
with the rate of development and those land use
zones identified as undeveloped land are an area
where canopy cover could be heavily impacted.
• Distribution of tree canopy within the
community
• Geopolitical patterns in canopy distribution
• Identification of potential planting areas
The analysis does not distinguish between trees on
public and private property since the benefits of trees
extend beyond property lines. The information can be
used to explore tree canopy in conjunction with other
available metrics, including geography, land use, and
community demographics. This data also establishes
a baseline for assessing future change.
Denton
78
What do we have?19
LAND COVER SUMMARY
Denton encompasses over 116 square miles
(74,492 acres). According to the 2016 State of the
Denton Urban Forest Report, Denton has 22,540
acres of tree canopy or 28% of the overall land
cover. The following characterizes land cover in
Denton:
• 45% (33,321 acres) low-lying vegetation
• 14% (10,506 acres) impervious surface,
including roads, parking lots, and structures
• 17% (7,394 acres) bare soil
• 1% (730 acres) open water
• 38,028 possible planting acres to achieve a
maximum of 52% canopy cover
• 458,000 tons of stored carbon in woody and
foliar biomass of trees
• $7.2 million in total annual environmental benefits
provided by both public and private trees
Map 1: Aerial Map of Denton
Texas
79
What do we have?
20 Urban Forest Master Plan
TREE CANOPY BY LAND USE
Canopy cover can vary widely across different land
use. In Denton, single-family residential areas have
the highest level of canopy cover among land use
designations with 45% canopy cover. Undeveloped
land has a canopy cover of 38%, followed by a
35% canopy cover for parks and open space. In
contrast, commercial land use designations have
a canopy cover of 12%.
Figure 2: Difference in Canopy Cover by Land Use
2008
20.4%
22.6%
27.9%
<1%
<1%
1%
1%
1%
3%
4%
5%
10%
28%
46%
0%10%20%30%40%50%
Government
Religious
Commercial
Infrastructure
Institutional
Multi-Family Residential
Parks & Open Space
Agriculture
Industrial
Single-Family Residential
Undeveloped
Canopy Cover (%)Land Use ClassCanopy Cover (%)Land Use Class
0%10%20%30%40%50%
Denton
80
Map 2: Planting Priority
in Denton
Texas What do we have?21
PLANTING PRIORITY
The planting priority analysis considered site
design and environmental factors, including
proximity to hardscape, canopy fragmentation,
soil permeability, slope, and soil erosion factors
to prioritize planting sites on both public and
private property for the greatest potential return
on investment. Potential plantable areas can be
determined by excluding pervious areas that are
unsuitable for planting (e.g., agricultural fields
and sports fields) and including impervious areas
where trees could feasibly be added (parking lot
islands, along sidewalks, and near road edges).The
analysis identified an estimated 32,009 acres on
public and private land where additional trees could
be planted in Denton, where 1,796 acres are high
or very high priority planting areas. Site visits are
necessary to determine suitability as well as the
actual number of planting sites.
This analysis provides a snapshot of current
conditions. Current canopy cover in Denton is
approximately 28%. If all available planting sites
were planted, the potential canopy cover could be
as high as 87%. However, it is important to note
that this estimate for a potential canopy cover does
not account for planned development. Therefore,
the actual potential canopy cover is likely much
lower. Furthermore, the current canopy cover,
combined with the estimated potential, can assist
in establishing a realistic canopy cover goal.
While available planting sites may ultimately be
planted over the next several decades, the trees
that are planted should be planned for areas of
greatest need and where they will provide the
most benefits and return on investment. Further
analysis could identify areas where trees and
other vegetation could help reduce the effects
of urban heat islands, reduce stormwater runoff,
and increase equitable distribution of canopy
across the City and provide benefits to currently
underserved areas.
81
Sugarberry 21%
Cedar elm 18%
Post oak 9%
Honey locust 8%
Honey mesquite 7%
American elm 6%
Eastern red cedar 5%
Green ash 4%
Shumard oak 3%
Boxelder 1%
Other species 18%
Although cedar elms exhibit some resistance
to Dutch elm disease (DED) compared with
American elm (Ulmus americana), cedar elm is still
susceptible to this devastating disease (Sallee,
2011). In the event of infestation of DED, Denton
could potentially lose 24% of the urban forest
(cedar elm and American elm).
While the exact species distribution of Denton’s urban
forest is unclear, oak species are well represented
in the community and may be an overrepresented
genus in the overall community, possibly in excess of
20% of the overall population. Oak wilt, an infectious
vascular disease caused by the fungus Ceratocystis
fagacearum, is one of the most destructive tree
diseases in the United States and is considered
an epidemic in central Texas (Texas A&M Forest
Service, 2019a). Both red and white oak species are
susceptible to this disease (Denton has both types)
and could potentially impact a significant portion of
Denton’s community trees.
The i-Tree Eco assessment estimates that of the
46 species observed in the 250 plot samples, only
two species (less than 1% of the overall population)
were noted as being invasive to Texas, including:
chinaberry (Melia azedarach), and Chinese tallow
tree (Sapium sebiferum) (Texas Department of
Agriculture, 2013). In contrast, most of Denton’s
tree species, an estimated 96%, are native to the
State of Texas.
SPECIES DIVERSITY
Maintaining species diversity in an urban forest
is essential. Dominance of any single species or
genus can have detrimental consequences in the
event of storms, drought, disease, pests, or other
stressors that can severely affect a public tree
resource and the flow of benefits and costs over
time. Catastrophic pathogens, such as Dutch elm
disease (Ophiostoma ulmi ), emerald ash borer
(Agrilus planipennis), Asian long-horned beetle
(Anoplophora glabripennis), invasive shot hole
borer (Euwallacea sp.), and sudden oak death
(Phytophthora ramorum) are some examples
of unexpected, devastating, and costly pests
and pathogens that highlight the importance of
diversity and the balanced distribution of species
and genera.
In light of significant pests and diseases, many
cities are opting to increase diversity to improve
resilience. The widely used 10-20-30 rule of thumb
states that an urban tree population should consist
of no more than 10% of any one species, 20% of
any one genus, and 30% of any one family (Clark et
al, 1997). While this rule does ensure a minimum
level of diversity, it may not encourage enough
genetic diversity to adequately support resilience.
Therefore the 10-20-30 rule should be considered
a minimum goal. Managers should always strive
to increase the range of representation among
species and genera within an urban forest.
An i-Tree Eco assessment was conducted as part
of the 2016 study, which estimated that the most
prevalent species in Denton, for both private and
public property, is sugarberry (Celtis laevigata, 21%)
followed by cedar elm (Ulmus crassifolia, 18%). Both
species exceed the general rule that no single species
should represent 10% of the urban forest resource
(Figure 2).
What do we have?
Figure 2: Estimated Species Distribution
22 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
82
% of Population DBH Class
23What do we have?
RELATIVE AGE DISTRIBUTION
Age distribution can be approximated by
considering the DBH range of the overall inventory
and individual species. Trees with smaller
diameters tend to be younger and those with larger
DBH are usually more mature. Age distribution
can be a key indicator of the needs of an urban
forest. If a forest is dominated by more mature
trees, these trees tend to need more maintenance
to preserve and may be at risk from aging out of
the canopy. Though these trees tend to provide the
most benefits in terms of canopy coverage, it is
important to have sufficient trees in younger age
categories to replace aging trees. Having a properly
distributed forest by age is essential to preserving
the future of Denton’s canopy.
The urban forest’s age distribution is a key
indicator and driver of maintenance needs. With
Denton’s public tree resource, the age distribution
reveals that 88% of trees are 12-inches or less DBH
and almost 2% of trees are larger than 24-inches
DBH (Figure 3).
Young trees are an essential component of the
longevity of Denton’s urban forest, as 58% of
sampled trees were measured at less than 6-inches
DBH. Some of these trees young trees may be
medium or large-stature tree species which is a
positive indicator for future benefits from the urban
forest, since large shade trees typically provide more
shade, pollutant uptake, carbon sequestration, and
rainfall interception than small trees.
Additionally, young trees have an opportunity
to benefit from structural training, the selective
pruning of small branches to influence the future
shape and structure of a young tree, which can
prevent costly structural issues and branch failures
as these young trees mature into their final size in
the landscape.
Over 40% of trees in the sample were of
intermediate age with a DBH between six to
24-inches. Similarly, these trees would also benefit
from structural pruning. With proper care, these
trees may turn into mature trees and provide
significant environmental and community benefits
for the City.
The sample indicates that almost 2% of the overall
sampled population is comprised of trees greater
than 24-inches DBH. In other words, there are
fewer large mature trees in Denton when compared
to younger trees. Managers have an opportunity to
regularly inspect and provide routine maintenance
to preserve mature trees as long as possible;
allowing younger trees time to grow, so that when
larger trees begin to decline the benefits provided
by younger trees are optimized.
Figure 3: Age Distribution of Sampled Trees in Denton
0%
0–3 3–6 6–12 12–18 18–24 24–30
Ideal Age Distribution
Denton Sampled Trees
>30
5%
15%
20%
25%
35%
30%
10%
Texas
83
Carbon Sequestered and Avoided $3,511,837 48.90%
Energy Savings $1,561,304 21.74%
Stormwater Management $1,350,000 18.80%
Air Quality $759,000 10.57%
BENEFITS
The benefits provided by the urban forest are
dependent upon the species, age (size), and
condition of the tree population. The urban forest
is the one component of urban infrastructure that
has the potential to increase in value over time
and with proper care.
In Denton, the estimated 3.5 million trees within
the community are providing $7.2 million in annual
benefits (Figure 4). A real potential exists for
urban forest benefits to substantially increase
over time as Denton’s young population of trees
mature. Currently, this resource provides the
following benefits:
Air Quality
Net annual air quality improvements, as a result
of decreased ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2),
sulfur dioxide (SO2), and particulate matter (PM10),
provided by public trees are valued at $759,000.
Energy Savings
Through shading and modification of their
immediate environment, Denton’s public trees
reduce annual electricity needs by 19,117
megawatts and natural gas use by -52,906 therms,
for a total benefit of $1.6 million.
Stormwater Management
Denton’s 3.5 million trees intercept more than 151
million gallons of stormwater annually, protecting
ground and surface water supplies from harmful
pollutants, for a total value of $1.3 million annually.
Carbon Reduction
By converting carbon into woody and foliar
biomass, Denton’s 3.5 million trees currently
sequester 23,000 tons of carbon per year, valued
at $3.1 million annually. An additional 3,400 tons
of CO2 is avoided through decreased energy use,
resulting in a net value of $452,000.
What do we have?
Figure 4: Annual Benefits of Denton’s Estimated
3.5 Million Trees
Denton24Urban Forest Master Plan
84
What do we have?
Services. Per the Denton Development Code,
pruning for clearance and visibility are the
responsibility of the adjacent property owner, but
this work is sometimes contracted out for trees
within the right-of-way that pose safety concerns.
Occasionally the Urban Forester works with the
Water Service Administration to mitigate impacts
from development and non-permitted activities in
Environmental Sensitive Areas.
Public Works is responsible for street, sidewalk,
and stormwater drainage system maintenance and
in instances where trees are a source of conflict
with infrastructure, the Urban Forester is asked for
recommendations on how to fix or mitigate the
issue. The Engineering Department communicates
with the Urban Forester on Capital Improvement
Projects (CIP) if trees may be impacted by the
design and the Urban Forest provides suggestions
on how to preserve existing trees.
The Urban Forestry Division has numerous pieces
of equipment necessary for providing care to City-
maintained trees. The Department has a 17-year-
old bucket truck with a 90-foot boom capacity.
Additionally, the Department has two chippers, both
less than ten years old.
The Urban Forest Program
Within the Parks and Recreation Department,
the Urban Forestry Division is staffed exclusively
by the Urban Forester. The Urban Forester is
responsible for the following maintenance
activities for street trees:
• Maintain clearance and visibility along City
streets and in parks and open space
• Emergency response (clearing tree debris from
parks and public property)
• Response to service requests (parks, trails,
and center medians)
• Dead and hazardous tree removal
• Design review
• Tree planting
• Pest management
• Community engagement
While Denton is fortunate to have a full-time
Urban Forester, who is highly trained and skilled in
arboriculture and urban forest management, due
to lack of internal resources, most tree work is
conducted by contractors on an as-needed basis.
This differs from other cities within the Dallas-Fort
Worth metroplex that have tree crews such as
Carrolton, Dallas, Fort Worth, and Plano.
The Urban Forester regularly consults with other
City Departments to find solutions for preserving
existing trees in the urban landscape and to
address drainage concerns. Requests to maintain
clearance above streets, sidewalks, and alleyways
are addressed by Community Improvement
PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT
PARK MAINTENANCE
DIVISION
URBAN FORESTRY
DIVISION
Texas 25
85
Services
CLEARANCE AND VISIBILITY
Community Improvement Services receives
complaints on a regular basis about tree clearance
issues. Primarily these complaints come from other
City Departments. The standard of clearance that
is required by the Development Code to maintain is
13.5 vertical feet over streets, 7 vertical feet above
sidewalks, and 12 vertical feet above alleyways.
Pruning can affect the growth rate of a tree. When
trees are young, pruning should primarily be
used to promote good structure. Heavy pruning
of young trees can result in structurally weak
waterspouts (upright, sucker-like shoots emerging
on the trunk or branches). While it is important
to maintain clearance and visibility, for young or
newly established trees pruning to maintain these
standards may not be conducive to overall health
or for promoting good structure. In such instances
where a young or newly established tree is violating
these standards, the Urban Forester will primarily
focus on creating vertical clearance in drive lanes
and maintaining clearance to allow for parked cars.
For mature trees, the Urban Forester coordinates
with Community Improvement Services to address
safety-related pruning or requests for tree removals.
With limited funds, minimal proactive maintenance
activities are primarily addressed through
contractors.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Through coordination within the Parks
Maintenance Division, tree debris in parks and
other City facilities following storm events and
response to immediate hazards is completed with
the assistance of Park Maintenance Staff. The
Streets Division addresses tree debris in streets.
TREE PLANTING
Currently, tree plantings occur through Keep
Denton Beautiful, Inc. (KDB) events such as the
Community Tree Giveaway, Tree Your Block events,
and Arbor Day events including the annual Denton
Redbud Festival, Children’s Arbor Day, and the
City’s inaugural Texas Arbor Day in 2019. Planting
incentive programs like Citizen Forester Training
Program, the Tree Rebate Program, and Trees
Mean Business also contribute to community tree
plantings. Additional tree plantings are completed
by contractors. Between 2016 and 2018, Parks and
KDB planted and distributed 9,629 trees.
Through the Denton Tree Initiative, KDB started
an ambitious campaign to mitigate deforestation
by 12,000 trees by 2019. While the programming
associated with the Initiative was successful at
increasing education and engagement, the goal
of planting 12,000 trees proved to be a challenge.
Challenges associated with achieving the goal of
planting 12,000 trees included the cost of irrigation,
the overall cost to plant each tree (average cost for
planting a 3-inch caliper tree was $400), and the
lack of willing participants with adequate planting
space on private land.
Additionally, the Urban Forester collaborates
with the City Landscape Architect and Park
Maintenance Irrigation Technicians to design
new park spaces and ensure proper placement,
planting, and irrigation installation for all newly
planted trees.
What do we have?
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND
OUTREACH
One of Keep Denton Beautiful’s main goals is to provide
educational outreach and resources to teach residents
about proper tree planting and care. Between 2016-
2019, Keep Denton Beautiful (KDB) staff and volunteers
provided outreach at 166 events, workshops, and
presentations and brought educational awareness to
an estimated 22,350 attendees.
During the annual Denton Redbud Festival, Keep
Denton Beautiful, Inc. provides educational seminars
on tree care and free or reduced cost trees for
community members who attend the classes. KDB
coordinates volunteer Citizen Foresters through the
Community Citizen Forester Training Program, a
semester-long training designed by Cross Timbers
Urban Forestry Council.
Citizen Foresters attend seven full-day trainings over
a six-month period and are mandated to complete
a set number of tree-specific volunteer hours every
year to maintain their designation. Citizen Foresters
assist in various volunteer planting events in Denton.
The Urban Forester is looking to expand the Citizen
Forester Program to include conducting corrective
pruning for park trees.
In November 2018, to celebrate Texas Arbor Day
and promote the Denton Tree Initiative, KDB hosted
a mini tree giveaway at the City’s inaugural Heritage
Festival. 100 free trees were given to Denton
residents and free classes about native trees and
tree care were offered.
26 Urban Forest Management Plan Denton
86
Dutch elm disease
In Dutch elm disease (DED), beetle vectors carry a
fungal pathogen (Ophiostoma ulmi and Ophiostoma
novo-ulmi ) that causes the vascular disease. The
pathogen blocks the flow of water and nutrients
throughout the tree, which quickly causes leaf
yellowing and wilting before the tree dies. The
pathogen can also move from infected individuals
to conspecific neighbors through root grafts.
Dutch elm disease has devastated American elm
populations, killing over 40 million elm trees since
its introduction into the United States in the 1930s
(D’Arcy, 2000). This disease is an ongoing threat to
Denton’s elm populations. Prioritizing preventative
measures such as regular inspections, ample
watering to increase tree vigor, and pruning out dead
branch material (D’Arcy, 2000) have helped maintain
elms as street trees in many western communities.
Oak wilt
There are many overlaps between oak wilt and
DED as they are both beetle vectored vascular
diseases that can also be spread through
root grafts. Oak wilt is caused by the fungus
Ceratocystis fagacearum. Oak wilt is one of the
most destructive tree diseases in the United States
and is considered an epidemic in central Texas
(Texas A&M Forest Service, 2019a). All ages and
sizes of oaks can be impacted. Red oaks, including
live oaks, are highly susceptible to this disease and
typically die two to four weeks after infection. In
contrast, white oaks are much less susceptible, and
in many cases survive an infection.
The City of Denton and Keep Denton Beautiful
promote available tree planting programs and
resources by using websites, printed mailings,
electronic newsletters and e-blasts, utility bill
inserts, press releases, postcard mailings, social
media, printed flyers and posters, outreach events,
and TV ads.
To promote the Tree Rebate Program, an incentive
program that provides residents with $50 rebates
for qualifying tree purchases, printed flyers, posters,
and tree tags are printed and distributed to five local
nurseries. In 2017, KDB staff visited these nurseries
during peak sales times to collect surveys and
promote the program to shoppers.
DTV
Denton has a government access channel, where
residents can receive information about local
happenings. Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc. promotes
their annual Community Tree Giveaway and all
other tree planting programs on the channel.
PEST MANAGEMENT
Similar to all urban forests, Denton’s urban forest
experiences pest and disease problems (Integrated
Pest Management (IPM) update, 2018). As Denton is
in close proximity to large urban centers and a highly
mobile population, there is also a risk of future pest
introductions. This, coupled with the current changes
in climate, make the community vulnerable to pests
and diseases. Although some diseases such as Dutch
elm disease (DED) and oak wilt are not new threats to
the area, they are still of significant concern. Potential
pests and diseases that are of most concern to the
community forest include:
Granulate ambrosia beetle
The granulate ambrosia beetle (Xylosandrus
crassiusculus) was first detected in South Carolina
in the 1970s and has since spread to multiple
states, including east Texas. This beetle feeds
on heartwood tissues. Secondary cankers can
also form on the bark where beetle entrance and
exit wounds occur. The ambrosia beetle has the
potential to colonize healthy or stressed trees
(Atkinson et al, 2000), and has a large hardwood
host range. Known hosts in the United States
include: Acer (maple); Albizia (albizia); Carya
(hickory); Cercis (redbud); Cornus (dogwood);
Diospyros (persimmon); Fagus (beech); Gleditsia
or Robinia (locust); Juglans (walnut); Koelreuteria
(goldenrain tree); Lagerstroemia (crape myrtle);
Liquidambar (sweetgum); Liriodendron (tulip
poplar); Magnolia (magnolia); Populus (aspen);
Prunus (cherry); Pyrus (pear); Quercus (oak);
and Ulmus (elm) (Cole, 2008).
Emerald ash borer
To date, the emerald ash borer (EAB; Agrilus
planipennis) has killed hundreds of millions of
ash trees making it the costliest introduced
forest pest in North America (Emerald Ash Borer
Information Network, 2019). EAB was documented
in northeastern Texas in 2016 and was recently
found north of Fort Worth. Counties nearby (Cass,
Harrison, and Marion) and adjacent (Tarrant) to
Denton County are under quarantine regulations
that restrict the movement of infested ash wood.
With the threat of EAB, it is important for Denton to
avoid planting additional ash trees. All species of
Fraxinus (ash) are susceptible to EAB.
What do we have?27Texas
87
Tree Removals Management
Tree Maintenance Tree Planting and Initial Care
Utility Line Clearance
Utility Line Clearance
$569,095
49.5%
Tree Planting and Initial Care
$293,165
25.5%
Tree Maintenance
$141,772
12.3%
Management
$130,819
11.4%
Tree Removals
$13,907
1.2%
Program Funding
Stable and predictable funding is critical to
effective and efficient management of the urban
forest. Trees are living organisms, constantly
growing and changing over time and in response to
their environment. There are a number of factors
that affect tree health and structure, including
nutrition, available water, pests, disease, wind, and
humidity. While it might seem like most changes
to trees take a long time to occur, some specific
maintenance is critical at certain stages of life. For
instance, young trees benefit greatly from early
structural pruning and training. Minor corrections
that are simple can be applied with low costs
when a tree is young. However, if left unattended
they can evolve into very expensive structural
issues and increase liability as trees mature (at
which point it may be impossible to correct the
issue without causing greater harm). Over mature
trees often require more frequent inspection and
removal of dead or dying limbs to reduce the risk of
unexpected failure. A stable budget allows urban
forest managers to program the necessary tree
care at the appropriate life stage when it is most
beneficial and cost effective.
Summary of Annual Funding
The average annual budget to care for Denton’s
public trees is $1.1 million (based on budgetary
records from 2016-2018). Between 46 to 54%
of funds are dedicated to maintaining utility line
clearance, which is provided by Denton Municipal
Electric (DME). Tree planting and initial care makes
up between 25-30% of annual budgets. Contractors
provide tree trimming services for trees in the public
right-of-way (trees located in center medians or
other areas not directly adjacent to private property),
approximately $50,000 annually. Parks receives 35
to 41% of annual funds. The remainder is divided
between Planning, Community Improvement
Services Capital Improvement Projects, and Keep
Denton Beautiful, Inc (Figure 5).
What do we have?
Tree Fund
The Tree Fund supports programming to increase
and maintain the public tree resource. With
estimated average deposits of $275,000, the funds
are used to purchase, plant, maintain, inventory,
and plan the urban forest. In addition, they allow for
preserving natural forested areas. The Tree Fund
also supports Denton Tree Initiative programs such
as the Tree Rebate Program, Trees Mean Business,
and Tree Your Block, which are programs designed
to provide or plant native and adapted tree species
on private property. It also supports educational
programs to educate the community residents and
developers about the benefits and value of trees.
28 Urban Forest Management Plan
Figure 5: Funding for Denton’s Public Tree Resource, Fiscal Year 2018-2019
Denton
88
SOLAR SHADE - TEXAS
About twenty-four states, including Texas, have solar
access laws that limit Homeowner’s Associations
(HOAs) from banning solar panels. These laws
override the HOA contract that restricts solar
installation. There are two types of solar access
rights that protect a homeowner’s right to install
solar: solar access laws and solar easements. Both
protect property owners’ rights to harness energy
from the sun but address different concerns.
In Texas, an HOA cannot legally prohibit a homeowner
from installing solar on their property. While these
laws protect a homeowner from being denied their
right to install solar, HOAs still have the ability to place
restrictions on where and how it is installed.
Texas Property Code 202.010 states that HOAs are
not allowed to include or enforce provisions within
their regulations, covenants, or by-laws that prohibit
or restrict homeowners from installing a solar energy
device. While this protects a homeowner’s right to
utilize solar energy, there are still several caveats
that allow HOAs to regulate the installation of solar
panels in certain situations. The law also stipulates
that the HOA may designate where the panels should
be located on the roof (a way around that is for the
homeowner to show that the designation hinders the
performance of the solar panels).
Regulations and Policies
Federal and State Law
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
Signed in 1973, the Endangered Species Act provides
for the conservation of species that are endangered
or threatened throughout all or within a significant
portion of their range, as well as the conservation of
the ecosystems on which they depend.
The listing of a species as endangered makes
it illegal to “take” (i.e., harass, harm, pursue,
hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect, or
attempt to do these things) that species. Similar
prohibitions usually extend to threatened species.
MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT (MBTA)
Passed by Congress in 1918, this Act defines that
it is unlawful to pursue, hunt, take, capture, kill,
possess, sell, purchase, barter, import, export, or
transport any migratory bird, or any part, nest, or
egg or any such bird, unless authorized under a
permit issued by the Secretary of the Interior.
The Migratory Bird Treaty Act can impact forestry
operations during times when birds are nesting, which
may delay work in order to avoid violating the MBTA.
Texas is quickly becoming a leader in the nation
at adopting solar technologies and Denton is one
of the early adopters of renewable technologies
and policy within the state (SEIA, 2019). Denton,
after Georgetown, is the second city in Texas to
announce a goal of 100 percent renewable energy
by the year 2020. This new goal updates the
Renewable Denton Plan where the original goal
was to use 70% renewables by the same year.
Denton’s utility company, Denton Municipal Electric
(DME), is a municipally owned utility (MOU)
that serves most of the City’s needs. An MOU
is different from an investor owned utility (IOU)
where customers have decision making power to
decide where they purchase power from (Hoisch,
2019). The flexibility of a MOU combined with
decreasing prices of solar and other renewable
technologies (Mahajan, 2018) allows for Denton
to take ownership of their utilities, diversify their
sources of energy, and utilize cleaner technologies
that allow for them to be a more resilient city.
The University of North Texas is also a leader of
integrating renewable energy credits for parts
of the Denton campus as well as the Discovery
Park campus.
What do we have?29Texas
89
DENTON PLAN 2030
The Denton 2030 Plan provides a vision for the
extended future of Denton. The Plan places a
strong emphasis on the viability of the urban forest
by defining clear goals to protect and enhance
greenspace. Citizens and stakeholders consistently
see Denton’s tree canopy as a critical part of
the future of the community. They identified the
urban forest as a dynamic component that can
improve resident’s quality of life when considered
in future planning. In this Plan, urban forests are
factored into urban design principles that support
sustainability and build community character, and
the community goals to enhance the conservation
and preservation of natural resources in Denton.
DENTON DEVELOPMENT CODE
Denton Development Code (updated April 2019)
has 7 subchapters that provide considerations
for trees or forested areas, including: Subchapter
2, Subchapter 3, Subchapter 4, Subchapter 6,
Subchapter 7, Subchapter 8, and Subchapter 9.
Subchapter 2: Administration and Procedures
Subchapter 2 provides alternative plans for
Environmentally Sensitive Areas when development
plans do not meet the established development
standards provided in Subchapter 7.
Subchapter 3: Zoning Districts
Subchapter 3 considers the preservation of
forested lands in some zoning districts.
Subchapter 4: Overlay and Historic Districts
Subchapter 4 applies height limitations to natural
structures, including trees, within the airport
zones. Denotes the incorporation of trees in front
of buildings as an architectural standard in some
Subareas.
Subchapter 6: Gas Wells
Subchapter 6 designates priority to gas well
ordinances if a conflict between tree preservation
and natural gas drilling arises. Environmentally
Sensitive Areas (ESAs) are considered, and a tree
inventory plan is required for proposed Drilling
and Production sites in ESAs. In situations where
drilling encroachment is allowed in ESAs, tree
mitigation measures apply and tree removal
requests are required.
Subchapter 7: Development Standards
Subchapter 7 provides standards for the
management, protection, and expansion of tree
canopy within all land and development in Denton,
unless otherwise noted. The subchapter also
specifies how the City administers the Tree Fund
for tree related work.
The subchapter prohibits the untimely removal of
trees; promoting the protection of existing trees.
As such, the subchapter requires tree removal
permits and proper mitigation standards if tree
removal is necessary and designates authorities
to enforce code and administer penalties. The
subchapter defines and provides a map of
designated Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs).
Additionally, the subchapter provides development
standards for floodplains, Cross Timbers Upland
Habitat, and riparian ESAs. For such areas, a
percent tree canopy retention level is set for
residential and non-residential developments in
Cross Timbers Upland Habitat.
What do we have?
Subchapter 7 outlines requirements for landscaped
buffers that provide transition between different
land use areas by minimizing noise, light, and other
nuisances. This section designates types of buffers
and their associated canopy cover.
This subchapter requires tree protection during
construction as outlined in the tree protection
detail. Standards for relocating heritage and quality
trees are provided. Additionally, the subchapter
provides pruning guidelines and defines other
activities that could influence tree replacement
standards. Designates when tree removal permits
are needed during land disturbance activities and
requires protection of street trees during land
disturbance activities. The subchapter defines
scenarios which necessitate tree mitigation. Tree
mitigation can include replacement plantings or
payments to the Tree Fund.
The purpose of the Tree Fund is defined and
includes the purchase, planting, maintenance, and
preservation of trees in the City. Tree Preservation
is further supported through preservation
incentives, called preserved credits. Credits are
awarded for when preservation goes beyond the
minimum requirement and can be applied towards
landscape canopy requirements. The subchapter
authorizes enforcement for standards on protected
trees, and allows the Director to approve removals
of protected trees if determined to endanger public
health, welfare, or safety.
The subchapter requires a Tree Survey and
Preservation/Replacement Plan to include details
on all protected trees within the area impacted by
the development. The Tree Survey and Preservation
Plans must meet the minimum preservation
requirements for each classification of protected
tree (e.g. Landmark Tree or Heritage Tree, Quality
Tree, of Secondary Tree).
This subchapter lists circumstances for exceptions
to tree preservation and removal. Alternatives to
tree replacement requirements are also included,
which provide alternatives to the tree replacement
requirements (e.g. preserved credit, replacement
trees, payment to the Tree Fund, tree donation, and
conservation easement). Incentives for preserving
or replacing trees as well as reducing hardscapes
are outlined.
Sets minimum standards for percent tree canopy
coverage throughout the City, including for the
different ecoregions present in Denton. The
subchapter applies minimum requirements for
canopy cover and landscaping elements according
to zoning.
Landscaping elements require a designated
percent of new plantings to be contained within
the Landscape Plant List in the Site Design
Criteria Manual and maintenance guidelines.
The subchapter requires the use of appropriate
planting materials and the landscape area point
system as standards for public areas. Different
buffers are required by zoning and adjacent land
use, and standards for such buffers are also
provided. Parking design standards also include
landscape screening. This subchapter also outlines
enforcement of, and alternatives to the landscape
standards for development sites and buffers that
include payment in lieu of planting.
The subchapter designates street tree planting
standards with specifications on location, spacing
and planting plans that require species diversity,
planting standards for trees, and maintenance.
Outlines protections for street trees. Designates
property owners responsible for maintaining
adjacent street trees.
30 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
90
What do we have?
DENTON MOBILITY PLAN –
2012 DENTON BIKE PLAN
The Denton Mobility Plan is currently being
updated. The 2012 Denton Bike Plan supports the
environmental, access, and safety goals contained
in the Denton Plan 2030, as well as, safety goals
of the US Department of Transportation. For
example, the Denton Plan 2030 envisions creating a
network of green infrastructure throughout the City.
Tree plantings around pedestrian and bike trails
provide barriers that lessen the impact of adjacent
cityscapes (e.g. traffic, noise, and air pollution) and
increase the overall aesthetics of the community.
Tree canopy can also improve the character and
usage of trials by increasing shading and helping
mitigate the effects of the urban heat island.
DENTON PARKS, RECREATION AND
TRAILS MASTER PLAN
The working Parks, Recreation, and Trails Master
Plan was accepted in 2001 and updated in
2009. The development of a new Master Plan
which reflects the changes in the community is
currently underway.
Subchapter 8: Subdivisions
Subchapter 8 recognizes ESAs in the development
of subdivisions and references the landscape
requirements provided in Subchapter 7 to be used
in lands set aside for common open space.
Subchapter 9: Definitions
Subchapter 9 defines tree and forest related terms.
2012 SIMPLY SUSTAINABLE DENTON
Simply Sustainable: A Strategic Plan for Denton’s
Future is a comprehensive report meant to improve
sustainability-related programming throughout
the City. In collaboration with the community,
the City created a vision, “to improve our
environment, create economic value, and support
and strengthen our community”, which guided the
Simply Sustainable document. Although the Plan
identifies eight focus areas (Water; Air Quality and
Greenhouse Gas Management; Energy Efficiency
and Conservation; Land Use and Open/Natural
Space; Transportation; Education, Communication
and Community Involvement; Material Resource
Management; and Local Food Production), the
Land Use and Open/Natural Space focus area
emphasizes the importance of the urban forest.
The Plan recommends preserving and maintaining
the green infrastructure, while aiming to enhance
tree canopy cover over time (from 19% in 2011).
Importantly, the Simply Sustainable Denton Plan
identifies the need to set targets for increased
canopy cover goals and places a high priority on
developing and implementing Tree Code.
DENTON MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC
BROCHURE
If a tree canopy has the potential to grow into
above ground utility lines, then it becomes a safety
hazard and warrants intervention. The Denton
Municipal Electric Brochure outlines ways to
prevent tree and utility line conflicts and explains
Denton Municipal Electric (DME) procedures when
conflicts arise. For prevention, DME encourages
residents to plant small stature trees that would
not interfere with above ground utility lines when
their mature heights are reached. DME resolves
emergency situations typically through contracts
with certified arborists to prune trees and maintain
safe distances from utility lines.
CITY OF DENTON INTEGRATED PEST
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Approved by City Council in May of 2019, the
Integrated Pest Management Program affirms
the City’s intentions to provide a holistic approach
to managing pests that are harmful to the health,
function or aesthetic value of park landscapes and
public health. The Integrated Pest Management
Program applies multi-faceted strategies that
minimize economic, health and environmental risks.
The Program includes goals to increase
connectivity to nature and enhance sustainability
through conservation practices within parks;
create and maintain a safe environment for the
community; provide a natural, healthy, educational,
and social environment; educate and promote
natural areas and cultural practices; and ensure
stewardship of fiscal resources. The Program
provides a definition of “IPM” consistent with U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency publications.
The Program identifies multiple strategies for
the management of pests including prioritization,
tolerance thresholds, design, plant selection,
cultural practices, mechanical and physical control,
biological control, and pesticides. The Program
identifies 19 strategies that outline the City’s
policies on pest management including; licensing
and training, pest management procedures,
pesticide material management, safety measures
and emergency response, and targeted pest
management.
Texas 31
91
CONCLUSION
As a Tree City USA, Denton is well aware of the
importance of trees and urban forests to the
health and sustainability of their community. With
a dedicated, well-trained Urban Forester and an
active non-profit (Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc.)
that provides educational programming on the
importance of trees, the City is well positioned
to sustain the health and environmental benefits
provided by its urban forest.
The local non-profit, Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc.,
has been invaluable for the last 30+ years in
engaging the community through educational
activities, volunteer tree planting events, and the
annual Denton Redbud Festival. Keep Denton
Beautiful continues to be a strong advocate on the
behalf of the urban forest, but also for providing
a robust volunteer base.
Because the urban forest is a dynamic, growing,
and ever-changing resource it will require sound
and proactive management to fully realize its
maximum potential. Trees are an integral part
of the urban landscape and the one component
of urban infrastructure that has the potential to
increase in value over time and with proper care!
Denton is a leader in sustainability, which is reflected
in recent revisions to the Denton Development Code
to expand tree canopy cover in new development
and through the Tree Fund. While this fund has
been greatly beneficial to the enhancement of
Denton’s urban forest, much of the funds have
been unavailable for use as a result of competing
interests in how the fund should be distributed. Clear
direction on the intent of the Tree Fund, whether it
is to purchase land with existing trees to preserve
for future generations or to fund tree plantings
throughout the City, will allow for more opportunities
to use the fund efficiently and cost-effectively.
State of the Denton Urban Forest Report (2016)
determined that the current tree canopy cover is
28%. A planting priority analysis determined that
there are 32,009 acres on public and private land
where additional trees could be planted. While this
significant amount of acreage highlights areas of
opportunity to increase tree canopy cover through
additional trees plantings, there are some other
considerations that should be taken into account.
For instance, some of the acres identified as able
to support tree plantings are actually planned for
development (residential and commercial). These
areas will eventually represent a mixture of land
cover that includes both hardscape (impervious
surface) and tree canopy. It is also important to
recognize that impervious surfaces and canopy
cover can co-exist in many instances especially
with the incorporation of appropriate design
standards. Canopy that extends over hardscape
features (including parking lots, streets, and
structures) can add to the overall amount of
canopy cover and reduce the ratio between canopy
cover and impervious surfaces. In addition, shade
provided by tree canopy can demonstrably extend
the life span of materials used in the construction
of hardscape features (McPherson et al, 2005).
What do we have?
Currently utilities compete for space within the
public right-of-way (water, electric, sewer, etc.).
Utility easements can restrict the amount of space
available for planting a tree, making it challenging
to meet Design Standards intended to promote tree
canopy cover, as well as, provide the necessary soil
volume to support a tree throughout its lifetime.
While the State of the Denton Urban Forest Report
(2016) provided estimates of the species that
comprise Denton’s urban forest, the study did not
include an inventory of all City-planted trees. A tree
inventory is crucial to understanding the health of
the community tree resource and also the necessary
maintenance needs of trees in the public right-of-
way. A complete inventory would provide the Urban
Forestry Division with information to determine the
resources required to address the maintenance
requirements of trees in parks and in the public right-
of-way (all of which would improve public safety).
Adjacent property owners are currently responsible
for all maintenance needs of trees planted in the
public right-of-way. Many property owners are
unaware of their responsibilities or may ignore
maintenance until they are cited by Community
Improvement Services or the tree is dead. Lack
of maintenance poses a risk to the public and
can greatly reduce the environmental benefits
these trees provide to the community. With a
complete inventory of trees, the City could explore
the feasibility of transitioning the maintenance
responsibility of trees from adjacent property
owners to the City.
With a highly mobile population in Denton, pests
and pathogens that threaten the health and
longevity of urban trees is an ever-present threat.
Among the pests that are a concern is the emerald
ash borer (EAB) which effects all species of ash (it
was recently discovered in Fort Worth). This pest
has proven throughout much of the Midwest to be
a highly destructive and expensive pest to manage.
Denton’s urban forest population is estimated to
have approximately 4% green ash (140,000 of the
3.5 million trees in Denton) which could prove to be
costly and result in significant losses to the overall
tree canopy cover. Monitoring for this pest is
critical in ensuring early detection and proactively
manage this highly destructive pest.
If EAB or some other pest arrives in Denton, a
potential challenge will be the City’s inability to
require property owners to remove dead, dying,
or diseased trees on private property. Not only do
these dead, dying, or diseased trees pose a threat
to public safety, but if infested with a damaging
pest, these trees could negatively affect the entire
urban forest if infestation spreads. Without an
amendment to the Code of Ordinances, the City has
no ability to protect the public or the urban forest
from such trees.
Ultimately, protecting and growing the urban forest
requires a commitment from the entire community.
While growth and development are vital to the
economic well-being of Denton, preservation of the
urban forest is equally important for ensuring that
quality of life expectations are maintained. Adopting
and enforcing proactive preservation objectives that
compliment development goals and recognize the
rights of property owners will ensure that Denton
remains a vibrant and attractive community.
32 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
92
What do we want?
What do we want?
To better understand how the community values the
benefits of the urban forest resource and to provide
residents and other stakeholders an opportunity to
express their views about management policy and
priorities, the Plan development process included
two community meetings.
Managing Partners
While awareness may vary, many individuals and
departments within the City share some level of
responsibility for the community urban forest,
including planning for, caring for, and/or affecting
the policy of urban forest assets. City partners were
invited to participate in an interview and discussion
about their role and perspective for the urban
forest as well as their views, concerns, and ideas
for the Plan. These interviews provided important
information about the current function of the Urban
Forestry program and potential for improvement.
Concerns, requests, and suggestions from all
stakeholders were of primary interest and were
provided full consideration in the development of
the Plan.
Key concepts gathered through the stakeholder
interview process include the following:
1. Dead, dying, or diseased trees on private
property pose a threat to public and private
property and public safety, but the City has no
jurisdiction over the removal of these trees.
2. Loss of natural oak stands as a result of rapid
development, climate change, flood control,
and poor species selection are the biggest
challenges looking ahead to the future.
3. Competing utility easements restrict the space
available for planting trees.
4. There is a strong desire to have an active and
engaged community group whose goal is to
preserve and protect the urban forest as well as
the Cross Timbers ecoregion in natural areas
and expanding developments.
5. There is a need for more education, or a
modification to the current code, regarding the
care of trees planted in the public right-of-way
within residential areas. Not all homeowners
realize their responsibility to care for these
trees; as a result, not all trees are receiving
adequate care.
6. Trees are primarily valued for aesthetics;
privacy screening, greening, and property
value improvements, as well as environmental
benefits; shading, and improving air quality.
7. Some view trees as a hindrance to development
and solar energy infrastructure, or a
complication to maintenance activities.
Managing Partners
Denton Municipal Electric
Fire/Community Improvement Services
Water Utilities/Environmental Services/
Watershed Protection
Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc.
Parks, Recreation &
Beautification Board
Planning/Development Services/
Building Inspections
Solid Waste
Engineering
Table 2: Managing Partners
How do they protect the heavily wooded areas, how
do they preserve natural areas, and build an urban
forestry department?
MANAGING PARTNERS
Texas 33
93
Community Partners
Community partners that impact Denton’s
urban forest were engaged in a discussion. Six
community partners were identified for input
including Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc., Texas Trees
Foundation, Denton County, Denton Community
Development Alliance, Dallas Builders Association,
and Preservation Tree, the Consulting Group.
Meetings were held on August 20th and August
21st, 2019 to engage with each partner about a
series of questions and discussion sessions.
Community partners were asked to speak on
their role in the care/advocacy of Denton’s urban
forest. Each partner provides unique services that
directly or indirectly enhance the urban forest.
Keep Denton Beautiful organizes tree education
programs, fundraising, and supports urban forestry
related advocacy programs. Additionally, they act
as a liaison between stakeholder groups. Texas
Trees Foundation helps bring partners together and
provides support to implement planning decisions.
The Denton Community Development Alliance
considers land development and urbanization,
and advocates for a balanced and equitable urban
forest. Dallas Builders Association is an advocate for
residential construction and the development sector.
Overall community partners feel that the City’s
Urban Forestry Division is striving to do what is
right for Denton’s urban forest and community
residents. Partners recognized the Urban Forestry
Division for providing long standing programing
and places for the public to engage.
Several major challenges and opportunities were
identified for the urban forest over the next 5 to 20
years. The primary concerns were (1) determining
the right trees to plant during a period of changing
weather patterns, (2) protecting and growing the
urban forest in the midst of rapid development, and
(3) increasing the canopy cover and level of tree
care in non-residential areas of Denton.
Denton’s current canopy cover is estimated at 28%.
Although some community partners supported
an increase in canopy cover, their consensus is
to consider economic and environmental factors
when deciding upon future plantings. Participants
encouraged enhancing canopy cover for certain
land use space such as commercial and parking lot
plantings, as well as increasing tree diversity.
Community partners advocated for tree planting
efforts on all kinds of City property including parks,
right-of-way, new residential neighborhoods, and
commercial complexes. Additionally, partners
suggested identifying tree canopy goals by land use
type (instead of one canopy goal for the entire City).
Currently, trees planted by the City within the public
right-of-way are the responsibility of the adjacent
property owner. Community partners thought that
property owners should not be obligated to care for
public right-of-way trees. However, funding would
be needed for the City to assume the maintenance
of neighborhood trees. Partners suggested
receiving funding from: 1) the General Fund, 2) the
existing Tree Fund, 3) a tree care fee, 4) or property
taxes in order for the City to maintain these trees.
In regard to natural areas, community partners
encouraged preservation through (1) incentivizing
developers and landowners to preserve existing
natural areas, (2) accepting natural areas as parks,
(3) establishing guiding documents to discourage
the removal of natural areas, (4) expanding upon
current ideas of natural areas that would fit
community goals and preservation challenges (i.e.
add fruit and nut trees, habitat, leave snags and
over growth, increase species diversity), and (5)
forming collaborative networks such as land trusts
or co-ops to advocate for preservation.
According to the Code of Ordinances, the City
has some ability to require property owners to
abate grass and weeds, but there are no specific
provisions for dead, dying, or diseased trees on
private property which pose a threat to public
property and/or safety. Community partners thought
the Code of Ordinances should be amended to
support the City’s ability to protect the public from
such trees but cautioned that the Urban Forestry
Division might not have the means or the funding
to be able to provide this service at no cost or a
reduced cost.
What do we want?
Denton34Urban Forest Master Plan
94
What do we want?
Community Meetings
Two community meetings were held during the
Plan development process. Both meetings were
advertised through social media City emails, City
website, and City newsletters.
The first meeting was held on Thursday, August
1st, 2019, from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m at City Hall
and was attended by 36 community members.
The meeting included a presentation about the
community’s urban forest and current program
status. Following the presentation, attendees
participated in a discussion and planning session
to identify goals and objectives for the Urban
Forest Master Plan.
Attendees were asked to provide their expectations
for public tree maintenance, locations for
additional tree plantings, and potential canopy
goals. Participants were also asked to share their
opinions on types of education and outreach and
the best opportunities for providing educational
materials and outreach activities.
Urban Forestry Staff engaged with community
members to understand their opinions on
amending the Code of Ordinances to allow the
City to require private property owners to remove
dead, dying, or diseased trees that pose a threat to
public property and safety. Additionally, residents
were asked about their stance on the City caring
for trees in the public right-of-way. Finally, residents
were asked their preferences on the use of the Tree
Fund, whether funds should be used to purchase
land to preserve existing trees or to fund additional
tree plantings.
More than 25% of responses to the question about
canopy goals indicated that they were not in favor
of a goal of no net loss of canopy. While over
31% of the responses to the question indicated
goals of a 35 to 52% canopy cover, nearly 43% of
the responses indicated that participants were
interested in additional information on the canopy
goals, most notably goals based on land use type.
Participants were asked to indicate their
preferences on where trees should be planted in
Denton. Nearly 23% of respondents to the question
indicated that they did not support a policy of not
planting more trees. New developments were
favored by 25% of respondents as a focus area for
new tree plantings. Support for other planting areas
was varied, but widely positive with nearly 31% in
favor of tree plantings regardless of location.
Over 38% of respondents did not support a “Keep It
Natural” or no maintenance approach when asked
about the desired level of care for public trees.
Coincidentally, 35% of respondents to the question
indicated that they would prefer proactive or a
plant health care-based approach. Notably, 20%
of respondents indicated that they were not sure
about the level of care that would be appropriate
and would require additional information.
Dead, dying, or diseased trees on private property
are not an uncommon site in Denton. While
Community Improvement Services frequently
receive complaints about such trees where
members of the public are concerned about public
safety, the City has no ability to require private
property owners to remove such trees. Input was
sought on revisions to the Code of Ordinances to
require property owners to remove dead, dying,
or diseased trees that endanger public property
and safety. While over 33% of respondents to the
question indicated support for an amendment (only
one person indicated that they would not support
such an amendment) the majority of respondents
(61%) indicated that they were not sure and would
require additional information.
According to the Denton Development Code,
trees required by the City to be planted in the
public right-of-way are the responsibility of the
adjacent property owner. Urban Forestry staff
were interested in gauging the community’s
support of this policy and asked if the City
(instead of the adjacent property owner) should
care for neighborhood trees in the public right-of-
way. Nearly 47% of respondents to the question
indicated support for this change in policy.
Similarly, nearly 37% of respondents indicated
that they did not support the City not maintaining
neighborhood trees in the public right-of-way. Like
other questions posed to the community, over
16% of respondents were not sure and wanted
additional information.
Questions posed to participants about the best
methods of outreach and topics for education
indicated that community members appreciate
multiple methods of outreach and engagement.
Of the educational topics that most interested
participants, 20% of respondents wanted
educational materials to help them decide which
tree to plant in their yard.
What do we want?
Urban Forestry Staff also wanted to understand
the community member’s opinion on how
the Tree Fund should be used in Denton.
Community members had numerous ideas such
as tree giveaways, street median and sidewalk
improvements, grants for local nurseries to
cultivate appropriate tree species, mapping of
the Cross Timber Region, tree spades for moving
valuable species for preservation, saving big
trees, and funding for tree removal assistance.
There was no clear consensus on how funds
should be allocated as maintenance on
conservation easements had the most support
(only 12% of respondents).
Although participants were not asked directly
about the conservation of the Cross Timbers
Region, numerous community members
verbalized their concerns for this natural resource
and its preservation.
The second meeting was held on Thursday,
January 9th, 2020, from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
at City Hall. The meeting included a presentation
of the proposed goals and objectives that were
recommended in the Plan based on the review
process and feedback from the first meeting, held
on August 9th, 2019. The meeting was attended by
38 community members.
Texas 35
95
Plan, Goals, & Actions
Based upon a review of the current Urban
Forestry program and resources, and input from
the community and other stakeholders, the Plan
identifies nine goals and seven existing policies
that support and represent what Denton residents,
stakeholders, and staff want for the future of
Denton’s urban forest. These goals and existing
policies, and the strategies that support them, are
intended to optimally manage the City’s community
forest in an efficient, cost-effective, sustainable,
and safe manner. Through this collaborative
stakeholder and community input process,
the Plan identifies three major focus areas:
1. A safe and healthy urban forest
2. Sustain environmental benefits
3. Engage the community to ensure the future of
the urban forest
FOCUS AREA: A SAFE AND HEALTHY
URBAN FOREST
This focus area aims for the implementation of more
proactive and quality tree maintenance. In general,
trees pose a minimal risk to the public, but tree care
should be taken into consideration when striving
to make the community safer and the urban forest
more resilient.
Goal 1: Efficiently manage the community tree
resource.
Striving to obtain information on all existing trees
and vacant sites present in the urban forest will
enhance staff’s ability to determine areas with
priority for tree care or planting. As a result,
maintenance can be done in a more efficient
manner.
Goal 2: Promote tree health and good structure.
When trees are well-maintained throughout their
lifetimes, the risks trees pose to the public are
reduced. Promoting tree health and good structure
decreases the chances of having hazardous trees in
the community and helps prevent tree conflicts with
utilities.
Goal 3: Mitigate and reduce risk of wildfire.
Living in areas, which are vulnerable to wildfire,
comes with the responsibility of managing and
reducing the risks that come with that exposure.
Wildfires are a naturally occurring event and
therefore cannot be prevented from occurring.
Denton and its community members have the
ability to mitigate and reduce the risks and potential
impacts of wildfire when it occurs.
What do we want?
Denton loves their trees no matter what condition,
species or location.
PARKS MANAGER,
CITY OF DENTON
36 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
96
Residential
What do we want?
FOCUS AREA: SUSTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL
BENEFITS
This focus area aims to preserve and enhance
the existing tree canopy thereby maintaining
the numerous benefits provided by the urban
forest. It is prudent to grow the urban forest
in a sustainable manner to ensure that trees
are planted and to also plan so that trees are
maintained throughout their lifetimes.
Goal 4: Recognize trees as green infrastructure.
Trees are essential infrastructure that need to be
planned for during design, similar to other utilities.
Considering trees as green infrastructure aims to
ensure their longevity through the planning and
implementation of comprehensive designs.
Goal 5: Promote tree preservation and protection.
As the community grows, it is important to
promote the protection of community trees. In
addition to following the current tree protections,
the Code of Ordinances should be periodically
reviewed and revised to refine and identify
requirements to support the urban forest and
canopy cover goal.
What do we want?
Goal 6: Develop a City-wide planting plan.
Planting plans not only encourage the opportunity
to maintain or enhance future tree canopy they
can also optimize the benefits that are gained
from the urban forest (based on planting priority
and choosing the right tree species for the
space). Furthermore, planting plans can prioritize
the equitable distribution of canopy cover and
support canopy goals set for various land use
designations (Table 3).
Goal 7: Plant Health Care (PHC) policies.
Pests and disease will always be a threat to the
urban forest. Implementing a Plant Heath Care
strategy will make the urban forest more resilient
and able to withstand invasive species. The strategy
should incorporate the use of multiple tools for
preventing pest and disease establishment and
managing current pest problems.
Future Land Use Designation Land Acres Canopy Cover (%)Canopy Acres
Commercial
Industrial
Other
All Land Use Designations
28,412
8,415
9,025
16,423
62,275
55.0%
10.0%
25.0%
40.0%
40.6%
15,627
842
2,256
6,569
25,294
Table 3: Canopy Goals for Future Land Use
FOCUS AREA: ENGAGE THE
COMMUNITY TO ENSURE THE FUTURE
OF THE URBAN FOREST
The urban forest is more likely to be
preserved and maintained by a community
that understands the benefits it provides.
Connecting the community to the urban forest
creates an environment for the community
members to advocate for the urban forest.
Goal 8: Support community engagement and
stewardship of the urban forest.
Although the City is not directly responsible
for the care of trees on private property, all
trees are an important component of the urban
forest. Education and outreach to encourage
best management practices for trees on private
property should be done to support the wellness
and benefits of the overall urban forest.
Goal 9: Celebrate the importance of urban trees.
Community designations and events surrounding
the urban forest build awareness and excitement
that ultimately encourages constituents to help
build upon existing canopy.
Texas 37
97
The estimated cost is categorized in the following
ranges:
• $ (less than $25,000)
• $$ ($25,000-$100,000)
• $$$ ($100,000-$200,000)
• $$$$ (greater than $200,000)
The Plan is intended to be a dynamic tool that
can and should be adjusted in response to
accomplishments, new information and changes in
community expectations, and available resources.
In addition to serving as a day-to-day guide for
planning and policy making, the Plan should be
reviewed regularly for progress to ensure that the
actions and sub actions are integrated into the
annual work plan.
The goals and actions proposed by the Urban
Forest Master Plan are organized by focus areas:
1. A safe and healthy urban forest
2. Sustain environmental benefits
3. Engage the community to ensure the future of
the urban forest
Each focus area is supported by measurable
goals, existing policies, and specific actions
that are intended to guide Denton’s urban forest
programming over the next 20 years, providing
the foundation for annual work plans and budget
forecasts. Many goals and actions support more
than one focus area.
For each action, the Plan identifies a priority, a
suggested timeframe for accomplishing the action,
an estimated cost range, and potential partners.
Priority is identified as:
• High− An action that is critical to protecting
existing community assets, reducing/
managing risk, or requires minimal resources to
accomplish
• Medium− An action that further aligns
programming and resource improvements
that have been identified as desirable by the
community, partners, and/or urban forest
managers, but that may require additional
investment and financial resources over and
above existing levels
• Low− An action that is visionary, represents an
increase in current service levels, or requires
significant investment
How do we get there?
Denton38Urban Forest Master Plan
98
How do we get there?
Focus Area: A safe and healthy urban forest
Goal 1: Efficiently manage the community tree resource.
OBJECTIVE:
Improve understanding of the structure and composition of
Denton’s community tree resource.
ACTIONS:
1. Conduct an inventory of all trees in parks, open space, trails,
City facilities, and public right-of-way.
a. After completion, regularly update inventory data as
maintenance occurs.
b. Compare and contrast the use of contractors versus an
in-house crew.
c. Consider redistributing funds to provide more proactive
maintenance.
d. Include potential tree planting sites to assist in planning for
future plantings.
2. Conduct a Resource Analysis for public trees to understand the
benefits provided by the public tree resource.
3. Consider the use of TreeKeeper® or similar tree inventory
management software.
4. Review Urban Forest Master Plan goals every 5 to 10 years,
and report progress via The State of the Urban Forest Report.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Complete inventory and plans for maintenance cycles for the
community tree resource.
RATIONALE:
A complete inventory of City-planted trees would allow the Urban
Forestry Division to identify maintenance needs and determine the
feasibility of the City caring for City-planted trees in neighborhoods.
Additionally, an inventory can be used to quantify the ecosystem
services provided by public trees.
RISK:
A lack of understanding of the age, structure, benefits, and
maintenance needs of public trees makes the community tree
resource vulnerable to loss of canopy cover. It also creates
challenges in responding to pests and could increase the costs of
managing such threats.
BENEFIT:
A better understanding of the public tree resource enables Urban
Forestry Division staff to prioritize tasks, improve efficiency, and
better plan for and manage pests and pathogens.
COST
$$
PRIORITY
HIGH
TARGET
1 YEARS
Texas 39
99
OBJECTIVE:
Following completion of a tree inventory, develop pruning and
maintenance cycles.
ACTIONS:
1. Identify costs required to maintain trees in parks and within the
public right-of-way.
2. Distribute maintenance needs evenly across grids or
maintenance areas.
a. Aim to provide maintenance according to the industry
standard of 4–5 years.
b. Consider areas that have been slated for development or
areas considered for annexation.
3. Publish maintenance cycles on the Urban Forestry Division
web page.
a. Include maintenance cycle maps.
b. Project timeframes for maintenance.
4. Review the Urban Forest Master Plan, and provide updates
as needed.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Complete inventory and plans for maintenance cycles for the
community tree resource.
RATIONALE:
A complete inventory of City-planted trees would allow the Urban
Forestry Division to identify maintenance needs and determine the
feasibility of the City caring for City-planted trees in neighborhoods.
Additionally, an inventory can be used to quantify the ecosystem
services provided by public trees.
RISK:
A lack of understanding of the age, structure, benefits, and
maintenance needs of public trees makes the community tree
resource vulnerable to loss of canopy cover. It also creates
challenges in responding to pests and could increase the costs of
managing such threats.
BENEFIT:
A better understanding of the public tree resource enables Urban
Forestry Division staff to prioritize tasks, improve efficiency, and
better plan for and manage pests and pathogens.
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
1-5 YEARS
Goal 1: Efficiently manage the community tree resource.
Focus Area: A safe and healthy urban forest
DentonUrban Forest Master Plan40
100
How do we get there?
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
ONGOING
Goal 1: Efficiently manage the community tree resource.
Focus Area: A safe and healthy urban forest
OBJECTIVE:
Continue to use planting funds successfully.
ACTIONS:
1. Determine a planting schedule to guide and prioritize new tree
plantings.
2. Plant the largest species of tree possible in the available space.
OBJECTIVE:
Review the Urban Forest Master Plan, and provide updates as
needed.
ACTIONS:
1. Review Urban Forest Master Plan (UFMP) goals every 2 to 5
years.
2. Adjust targets to continue to align with:
a. Community values and expectations of the urban forest.
b. Funding availability.
c. City goals, policies, and actions.
3. Conduct a State of the Urban Forest Report (at year one),
then every two to five years.
4. Report progress and challenges of the UFMP via
The State of the Urban Forest Report.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Complete inventory and plans for maintenance cycles for the
community tree resource.
RATIONALE:
A complete inventory of City-planted trees would allow the Urban
Forestry Division to identify maintenance needs and determine the
feasibility of the City caring for City-planted trees in neighborhoods.
Additionally, an inventory can be used to quantify the ecosystem
services provided by public trees.
RISK:
A lack of understanding of the age, structure, benefits, and
maintenance needs of public trees makes the community tree
resource vulnerable to loss of canopy cover. It also creates
challenges in responding to pests and could increase the costs of
managing such threats.
BENEFIT:
A better understanding of the public tree resource enables Urban
Forestry Division staff to prioritize tasks, improve efficiency, and
better plan for and manage pests and pathogens.
Texas 41
101
Focus Area: A safe and healthy urban forest
OBJECTIVE:
Explore the feasibility of the City taking responsibility for the
maintenance of community trees in neighborhoods.
ACTIONS:
1. Examine the resources that would be required to maintain
community trees in neighborhoods.
2. Consider current staffing levels.
a. Explore the addition of staff to the Urban Forestry Division.
b. Consider the use of contractors to complete maintenance tasks.
OBJECTIVE:
Revise policies and standards for pruning young trees to promote
healthy growth and structure.
ACTIONS:
1. Allow for flexibility for clearance and visibility requirements
for young trees to promote good structure and health.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Reduction in removals and claims against the City.
RATIONALE:
When the minimum level of care is met for all community trees,
the potential for all the trees to reach maturity increase and the
benefits provided by those trees also increases as trees mature.
RISK:
The community tree resource and the greater urban forest could
suffer significant losses to tree canopy cover as a result of
removals or from pest infestations due to lack of maintenance.
BENEFIT:
Regular maintenance and inspection of the community tree
resource promotes better tree health and structure, which reduces
the number of removals, branch and tree failures as a result of poor
structure, and increases the benefits provided to the community.
Goal 2: Promote tree health and good structure.
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
5 YEARS
COST
$
PRIORITY
HIGH
TARGET
1 YEARS
Denton42Urban Forest Master Plan
102
Focus Area: A safe and healthy urban forest
OBJECTIVE:
Ensure community trees are maintained according to industry
standards to promote tree health, longevity, and also public safety.
ACTIONS:
1. Educate community members about their responsibilities in the
care of public trees.
2. Use current ANSI and BMPs.
3. Consider requiring professional licensing for tree care
companies operating within City limits.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Reduction in removals and claims against the City.
RATIONALE:
When the minimum level of care is met for all community trees,
the potential for all the trees to reach maturity increase and the
benefits provided by those trees also increases as trees mature.
RISK:
The community tree resource and the greater urban forest could
suffer significant losses to tree canopy cover as a result of
removals or from pest infestations due to lack of maintenance.
BENEFIT:
Regular maintenance and inspection of the community tree
resource promotes better tree health and structure, which reduces
the number of removals, branch and tree failures as a result of poor
structure, and increases the benefits provided to the community.
Goal 2: Promote tree health and good structure.
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
5 YEARS
Texas How do we get there?43
103
OBJECTIVE:
Contribute to a fire safe community.
ACTIONS:
1. Initiate contact with the Texas A&M Forest Service Wildland
Urban Interface (WUI) Specialist to assist in developing a
Community wildfire protection plan.
2. Reduce ladder fuels in natural areas.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Reduction in ladder fuels and a Community Wildfire Protection Plan.
RATIONALE:
According to the Texas Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal, Denton
has vulnerabilities to wildfire. Wildfires are a naturally occurring
phenomenon, but Denton and its community members have a role
in mitigating the risks associated with living in the Wildland Urban
Interface.
RISK:
Wildfires result in the burning of forests and pastureland, but also
accumulate in the staggering loss of property and life. Recovery
from wildfires can have negative economic impacts for years
following fire.
BENEFIT:
Mitigating the risk of fire, reduces the likelihood of losses to
property and life.
Goal 3: Mitigate and reduce risk of wildfire.
Focus Area: A safe and healthy urban forest
COST
$
PRIORITY
HIGH
TARGET
ONGOING
Denton44Urban Forest Master Plan
104
OBJECTIVE:
Minimize the encroachment of other utilities.
ACTIONS:
1. Consider amending clearance and visibility standards to avoid
excessive pruning of young or newly established trees.
2. Use root barrier to reduce root and sidewalk conflicts.
3. As the General Plan or other long-term planning documents are
revised, consider impacts on trees.
4. Maintain a Tree Committee to review changes to the Denton
Development Code.
5. Promote Complete Streets in the Denton Parks, Recreation and
Trails Master Plan and the Denton Mobility Plan.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Reduced number of removals and conflicts reported between trees
and other utilities.
RATIONALE:
Designating trees as green infrastructure designates trees as a key
element in cityscapes, as is expected for other infrastructure.
RISK:
Trees and other utility conflicts may result in undesirable pruning
or tree removals that could have been avoided through alternative
design solutions and repairs.
BENEFIT:
Planning for trees limits the need to mitigate conflicts between
trees and other utilities and promotes tree longevity.
Goal 4: Recognize trees as green infrastructure.
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
COST
$
PRIORITY
HIGH
TARGET
5 YEARS
How do we get there?45Texas
105
OBJECTIVE:
Develop maintenance and design strategies for mitigating
conflicts with otherwise healthy trees.
ACTIONS:
1. Detour walkways around trees, ramping over roots, and
grinding down displaced sidewalk panels to reduce tripping
hazards without causing undue harm to critical roots.
2. Explore alternative sidewalk designs to allow space for trees
and compliance with ADA and avoid tree removal.
a. Crushed granite.
b. Gravel sub-base and other structural soils.
c. Other structural cells (Strata Cells or Silva Cells).
d. Interlocking concrete paver products.
e. Flexipave, a system similar to rubber sidewalks.
f. Alternative tree grate structures.
g. Polygrate, a recycled plastic form of tree grate.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Reduced number of removals and conflicts reported between trees
and other utilities.
RATIONALE:
Designating trees as green infrastructure designates trees as a key
element in cityscapes, as is expected for other infrastructure.
RISK:
Trees and other utility conflicts may result in undesirable pruning
or tree removals that could have been avoided through alternative
design solutions and repairs.
BENEFIT:
Planning for trees limits the need to mitigate conflicts between
trees and other utilities and promotes tree longevity.
Goal 4: Recognize trees as green infrastructure.
COST
$-$$$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
10 YEARS
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
Denton46Urban Forest Master Plan
106
OBJECTIVE:
Ensure Design Standards adequately consider trees.
ACTIONS:
1. Continue to require minimum canopy cover goals as identified
in Subchapter 7 of the Denton Development Code.
2. Revise Design Standards to include minimum parkway widths
to allow for tree plantings.
a. Consider expanding the minimum width of planting strips
from 5.5 feet to 8 feet.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Reduced number of removals and conflicts reported between trees
and other utilities.
RATIONALE:
Designating trees as green infrastructure designates trees as a key
element in cityscapes, as is expected for other infrastructure.
RISK:
Trees and other utility conflicts may result in undesirable pruning
or tree removals that could have been avoided through alternative
design solutions and repairs.
BENEFIT:
Planning for trees limits the need to mitigate conflicts between
trees and other utilities and promotes tree longevity.
Goal 4: Recognize trees as green infrastructure.
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
10 YEARS
Texas 47How do we get there?
107
OBJECTIVE:
Revise and amend the Code of Ordinances to promote the
protection of community trees.
ACTIONS:
1. Amend the Code of Ordinances to allow the City to require
private property owners to remove dead, dying, or diseased
trees that pose a risk to public property and safety.
2. Prohibit dumping and storage of deleterious substances
near trees.
OBJECTIVE:
Define the purpose and use of the Tree Fund.
ACTIONS:
1. The Tree Fund shall be allocated as follows:
a. 60% tree planting
b. 35% property purchase (see Property Purchase Criteria,
Appendix G)
c. 5% education/outreach
2. Enforce conservation standards laid out in the Denton
Development Code.
3. Explore ways to expand tree canopy through Open Space.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Reduction in removals and no-net loss in tree canopy cover.
RATIONALE:
Trees take a long time to grow. Preserving and protecting existing
trees ensures that the stream of benefits provided by community
trees is not lost or disrupted and has the opportunity to increase
this stream of benefits over time.
RISK:
Loss of tree canopy cover and associated environmental benefits.
BENEFIT:
Preservation of community trees, including iconic post oak trees,
ensures the environmental benefits are sustained and trees that have
been preserved and protected have the potential to provide even
more benefits to the community over the course of their lifetimes.
Goal 5: Promote tree preservation and protection.
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
1-5 YEARS
COST
$-$$$$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
ONGOING
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
Denton48Urban Forest Master Plan
108
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
OBJECTIVE:
Mitigate the impacts of development on native post oak stands.
ACTIONS:
1. Avoid disturbance to soils as much as possible.
2. Set up Tree Protection Zones around post oak trees deemed
for preservation within development projects.
3. Continue to incentivize the preservation of post oak for
development projects.
OBJECTIVE:
Educate the community about their role in maintaining a safe
urban forest.
ACTIONS:
1. Provide a list of certified arborists and licensed professionals
to perform maintenance on private trees.
2. Provide educational materials on proper pruning techniques.
3. Provide education to property owners about the importance
of not planting trees under overhead utilities and identifying
underground utilities prior to digging a hole to plant a tree.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Reduction in removals and no-net loss in tree canopy cover.
RATIONALE:
Trees take a long time to grow. Preserving and protecting existing
trees ensures that the stream of benefits provided by community
trees is not lost or disrupted and has the opportunity to increase
this stream of benefits over time.
RISK:
Loss of tree canopy cover and associated environmental benefits.
BENEFIT:
Preservation of community trees, including iconic post oak trees,
ensures the environmental benefits are sustained and trees that have
been preserved and protected have the potential to provide even
more benefits to the community over the course of their lifetimes.
Goal 5: Promote tree preservation and protection.
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
ONGOING
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
ONGOING
Texas 49How do we get there?
109
OBJECTIVE:
Achieve 40% canopy cover by 2040.
ACTIONS:
1. Adjust canopy goals per Land Use designation.
a. 55% for Residential
b. 25% for Commercial
c. 10% for Industrial
d. 40% for Other (rural and right-of-way)
2. Set a sustainable annual planting goal.
3. Promote the planting of trees on private property within areas
of high or very high planting priority.
4. Conduct a Land Cover Assessment with revised City
boundaries, including newly annexed areas.
5. Enforce conservation standards laid out in the Denton
Development Code.
6. Explore ways to expand tree canopy through Open Space.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
More equitable distribution of tree canopy cover across the City.
RATIONALE:
A planting plan provides direction and clarity so canopy goals can be
set, tracked, and achieved.
RISK:
Although tree plantings would still occur, efforts may not be targeted
to areas where increased tree canopy would provide the community
with the maximum benefits.
BENEFIT:
Canopy goals are more easily set and reached.
Goal 6: Develop a City-wide planting plan.
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
ONGOING
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
Denton50Urban Forest Master Plan
110
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
OBJECTIVE:
Promote species diversity in the urban forest.
ACTIONS:
1. Continue to choose species that are better suited to the
local climate.
2. Continue to avoid planting species of trees with similar
vulnerabilities to pests and disease as current species.
3. Continue to incorporate native species into planting palettes.
4. Continue to use drought tolerant species.
5. Use pest and disease resistant species when available.
6. At a minimum, pursue species diversity goals that meet the 10-
20-30 rule, but strive for even greater diversity among genera.
7. Cease plantings of ash to mitigate impacts of emerald
ash borer.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
More equitable distribution of tree canopy cover across the City.
RATIONALE:
A planting plan provides direction and clarity so canopy goals can be
set, tracked, and achieved.
RISK:
Although tree plantings would still occur, efforts may not be targeted
to areas where increased tree canopy would provide the community
with the maximum benefits.
BENEFIT:
Canopy goals are more easily set and reached.
Goal 6: Develop a City-wide planting plan.
COST
$
PRIORITY
HIGH
TARGET
ONGOING
Texas 51How do we get there?
111
OBJECTIVE:
Encourage equitable distribution of tree canopy cover across the City.
ACTIONS:
1. Use planting priority mapping to identify planting sites within
higher planting priority areas.
2. Conduct planting priority analysis to identify planting sites
that would have the greatest impact of reducing urban heat
islands and stormwater runoff.
3. Classify and prioritize available planting sites based on:
a. Space and minimum planting setbacks.
b. Soil characteristics.
c. Irrigation infrastructure.
d. Landscape objectives and tree density.
e. Site constraints and existing infrastructure, including
hardscape, utilities (overhead and underground), bridges,
and culverts.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
More equitable distribution of tree canopy cover across the City.
RATIONALE:
A planting plan provides direction and clarity so canopy goals can be
set, tracked, and achieved.
RISK:
Although tree plantings would still occur, efforts may not be targeted
to areas where increased tree canopy would provide the community
with the maximum benefits.
BENEFIT:
Canopy goals are more easily set and reached.
Goal 6: Develop a City-wide planting plan.
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
ONGOING
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
Denton52Urban Forest Master Plan
112
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
OBJECTIVE:
Set emphasis on planting the right tree in the right place.
ACTIONS:
1. Reduce hardscape and utility conflicts.
2. Match tree species to soil and water conditions.
3. Match tree species to planter size and intended use.
4. Consider mature crown spread.
a. Optimize shade and environmental benefits by planting
large stature trees where feasible.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
More equitable distribution of tree canopy cover across the City.
RATIONALE:
A planting plan provides direction and clarity so canopy goals can be
set, tracked, and achieved.
RISK:
Although tree plantings would still occur, efforts may not be targeted
to areas where increased tree canopy would provide the community
with the maximum benefits.
BENEFIT:
Canopy goals are more easily set and reached.
Goal 6: Develop a City-wide planting plan.
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
ONGOING
Texas 53How do we get there?
113
OBJECTIVE:
Encourage the expansion of the urban forest through tree plantings on
private property.
ACTIONS:
1. Expand Arbor Day celebrations to include plantings of trees, in
addition to eastern redbud, to increase diversity.
2. Continue to provide trees to residents through the annual tree
give-away through Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc.
3. Provide educational materials to inform residents about the
dangers of planting trees near overhead utilities.
4. Regularly review and update species list to reflect diversity
goals and include species that are high performers.
5. Publish recommended species list on the Urban Forestry
Division webpage.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
More equitable distribution of tree canopy cover across the City.
RATIONALE:
A planting plan provides direction and clarity so canopy goals can be
set, tracked, and achieved.
RISK:
Although tree plantings would still occur, efforts may not be targeted
to areas where increased tree canopy would provide the community
with the maximum benefits.
BENEFIT:
Canopy goals are more easily set and reached.
Goal 6: Develop a City-wide planting plan.
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
ONGOING
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
Denton54Urban Forest Master Plan
114
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
OBJECTIVE:
Support stormwater management through the strategic growth
of canopy.
ACTIONS:
1. Consider the incorporation of trees in dry retention ponds.
2. Explore the use of bioswales in stormwater management
systems.
3. Consider a planting priority analysis with prioritization for
stormwater management.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
More equitable distribution of tree canopy cover across the City.
RATIONALE:
A planting plan provides direction and clarity so canopy goals can be
set, tracked, and achieved.
RISK:
Although tree plantings would still occur, efforts may not be targeted
to areas where increased tree canopy would provide the community
with the maximum benefits.
BENEFIT:
Canopy goals are more easily set and reached.
Goal 6: Develop a City-wide planting plan.
COST
$
PRIORITY
LOW
TARGET
10 YEARS
Texas 55How do we get there?
115
OBJECTIVE:
Monitor invasive species.
ACTIONS:
1. Continue to follow Denton’s Integrated Pest Management
program.
2. Reduce the impacts of Chinese privet in Environmentally
Sensitive Areas.
3. Inspect ash trees regularly for signs and symptoms of
emerald ash borer.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Reduced impact from invasive species.
RATIONALE:
Being aware of and able to identify potential invasive species
allows managers to approach management and prevention in
a way that fits the community’s resources.
RISK:
Undesirable species may become established and threaten
native species.
BENEFIT:
Using comprehensive information to outline best management
strategies that can be used to prepare for and/or manage invasive
species can lessen the detrimental impacts they have on the
urban forest.
Goal 7: Adopt Plant Health Care (PHC) policies.
COST
$
PRIORITY
MODERATE
TARGET
10 YEARS
Focus Area: Sustain environmental benefits
Denton56Urban Forest Master Plan
116
Focus Area: Engage the community to ensure the future of the urban forest
How do we get there?
OBJECTIVE:
Develop and maintain a web page for the Urban Forestry Division
on the City website.
ACTIONS:
1. Consolidate important tree-related information on the City website.
2. Summarize maintenance responsibilities of adjacent property
owners for City required planted trees.
a. Provide links for proper tree-care resources.
i. How to plant a tree.
ii. How to prune a tree.
iii. How to fertilize and mulch.
iv. How to irrigate.
v. How to hire an arborist or tree care company.
3. Share the Urban Forest Master Plan through the City website.
4. Publish A State of the Urban Forest Report (at year one), then
every two to five years.
a. Update community members on the overall condition of
the community urban forest.
b. Highlight services (number of trees planted, number of
trees inventoried, etc.).
c. Update community members on progress towards canopy
goals and trees planted (public and private).
d. Update the community on achievements of the Urban
Forest Master Plan.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Participation in forestry programming.
RATIONALE:
An educated and engaged community is more likely to support and
advocate for the urban forest.
RISK:
Apathy towards the urban forest may result in loss in benefits
provided by the urban forest to the community.
BENEFIT:
A community that supports the urban forest protects the urban
forest and therefore the benefits that it provides to the City.
Goal 8: Support community engagement and stewardship of the urban forest.
COST
$
PRIORITY
LOW
TARGET
ONGOING
Texas 57
117
Focus Area: Engage the community to ensure the future of the urban forest
OBJECTIVE:
Develop and maintain a web page for the Urban Forestry Division
on the City website.
ACTIONS (CONTINUED):
5. Share and maintain the recommended tree species list through the
City website.
6. Provide a link to Keep Denton Beautiful on the City website.
a. Include information about volunteer opportunities.
7. Provide a link to Denton Municipal Electric Tree Trimming Brochure
on the City website.
8. Provide a link on the City website to the Denton Development Code
Tree Preservation standards for development.
9. Communicate the benefits of trees and tree canopy including
environmental, social, and economic benefits.
10. Communicate importance of post oak and blackjack oak trees.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Participation in forestry programming.
RATIONALE:
An educated and engaged community is more likely to support and
advocate for the urban forest.
RISK:
Apathy towards the urban forest may result in loss in benefits
provided by the urban forest to the community.
BENEFIT:
A community that supports the urban forest protects the urban
forest and therefore the benefits that it provides to the City.
Goal 8: Support community engagement and stewardship of the urban forest.
Denton58Urban Forest Master Plan
118
Focus Area: Engage the community to ensure the future of the urban forest
OBJECTIVE:
Interact with community members through a variety of outlets.
ACTIONS:
1. Continue to partner with Keep Denton Beautiful, Inc (KDB).
a. Continue to use volunteers through the Cross Timbers Urban
Forestry Council Citizen Foresters Training Program.
i. Expand Citizen Foresters’ skills to provide structural
pruning for trees in parks.
b. Continue to provide support for KDB programming.
2. Continue to use DTV to provide community members with
important information about trees.
3. Explore further engagement through social media, including the
existing Denton Trees Facebook Group.
4. Conduct community surveys to gauge public support as objectives
of the Urban Forest Master Plan are implemented.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Participation in forestry programming.
RATIONALE:
An educated and engaged community is more likely to support and
advocate for the urban forest.
RISK:
Apathy towards the urban forest may result in loss in benefits
provided by the urban forest to the community.
BENEFIT:
A community that supports the urban forest protects the urban
forest and therefore the benefits that it provides to the City.
Goal 8: Support community engagement and stewardship of the urban forest.
COST
$
PRIORITY
LOW
TARGET
ONGOING
Texas 59How do we get there?
119
Focus Area: Engage the community to ensure the future of the urban forest
OBJECTIVE:
Maintain Tree City USA.
ACTIONS:
1. Continue to celebrate Arbor Day through the annual Redbud
Festival and Texas Arbor Day Celebration.
a. Promote species diversity.
b. Include education materials about the benefits provided by
trees.
c. Distribute tree care materials.
i. How to plant a tree.
ii. How to prune a tree.
iii. How to fertilize and mulch.
iv. How to irrigate.
v. How to hire an arborist or tree care company.
PERFORMANCE MEASURE:
Continued recognition as a Tree City USA and Arbor Day activities/
celebrations.
RATIONALE:
Observing and recognizing the benefits provided by the urban
forest encourages community engagement and promotes
appreciation for trees.
RISK:
When community members are unaware of the benefits of the
urban forest, people are likely going to be less supportive of
programming and the resources needed to care for it.
BENEFIT:
Community awareness and appreciation of the urban forest
promotes support for the necessary resources to maintain it.
Goal 9: Celebrate the importance of urban trees.
COST
$
PRIORITY
LOW
TARGET
ONGOING
Denton60Urban Forest Master Plan
120
How do we get there?61
Annual Plan Review
The Plan is an active tool that will guide
management and planning decisions over the next
20 years. Its goals and actions will be reviewed
annually for progress and integration into an
internal work plan. The Plan presents a long-range
vision and target dates are intended to be flexible
in response to emerging opportunities, available
resources, and changes in community expectations.
Therefore, each year, specific areas of focus should
be identified, which can inform budget and time
requirements for Urban Forest Managers.
Resource Analysis
With a Resource Analysis, Denton can identify
quantitatively the value of the composition of
public trees, the annual benefit provided to the
community, replacement value, and benefit versus
investment ratios. With this information, Denton
can improve health (condition), species diversity,
annual benefits, and overall resource value of
its tree resource. When a resource analysis is
conducted every five years, the City can illustrate
progress and success towards Plan goals. A five-
year Resource Analysis review is a possible way to
monitor progress on efforts to increase diversity
through a list of tree species appropriate for a
variety of different spaces and landscapes.
With appropriate care and planning, the urban
forest is an asset that has the potential to increase
in value over time. As young trees mature and their
leaf surface and canopy grow, so too will the overall
benefits and value from the community’s urban
forest. The objectives and strategies of the Plan are
intended to support this process in an appropriate
manner that encourages the sustainable
stewardship of community trees with consideration
for safety, cost efficiency, and community values.
The Plan includes strategies for measuring the
success of the Plan over time.
Monitoring
Through talking with community partners and
those within the urban forestry program, a set of
goals were created to meet the strong demand
for protecting and enhancing the urban forest,
as stated in the community vision. The success
of these goals is largely dependent on creating
objectives and strategies to meet the targets
outlined in the Plan as well as monitor the progress
of these action steps.
How are we doing?
Texas
121
Reporting
Completion of this Plan is the first step towards
achieving the vision for Denton’s urban forest.
Continual monitoring, analysis, and revisions
will help forest managers keep stakeholders
informed and engaged. By organizing data into
specific components (for example; Urban Forest
Reports, Community Satisfaction Surveys), it will
be possible to revise specific areas of weakness
and buttress areas of strength. Revisions to the
Plan should occur with major events, such as
newly discovered pests or diseases, or significant
policy and regulation changes. A complete
formal revision should occur in unison with major
municipal projects, such as the Comprehensive
Plan. It is important to remember that the Denton
Urban Forest Master Plan is a living document that
should adapt to new conditions.
State of the Urban
Forest Report
The purpose of the report is to provide structural
and functional information about the urban forest
(including the municipal forest) and recommend
strategies for its proactive management,
protection, and growth.
Canopy Analysis
Due to findings from the State of the Denton
Urban Forest Report, Denton has a baseline tree
canopy for the entire urban forest, which allows
for continued monitoring of trends in the canopy
cover on private property.
Community Satisfaction
Plan results will be measurable through increased
benefits and value in the community tree resource
and the preservation and eventual increase
in canopy cover over time. Attainment of the
objectives and strategies will support better
tree health, greater longevity, and a reduction
in tree failures. However, one of the greatest
measurements of success for the Plan will
be its level of success in meeting community
expectations for the care and preservation of the
community tree resource. Community satisfaction
can be measured through surveys and will be
evidenced by public support for realizing the
objectives of the Plan. Community satisfaction can
also be gauged by the level of engagement and
support for forestry programs.
How are we doing?
62 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
122
Appendices
D’Arcy, C.J. 2000. Dutch elm disease. The Plant Health Instructor. DOI: 10.1094/PHI-I-2000-0721-02
Denton Historic Landmark Commission, Framework for the Future: A Preservation Guidebook for Denton,
Texas (Denton: Denton Historic Landmark Commission, n.d.), n.p
Denton, Texas. 2019. CantyMedia. Retrieved from: https://www.weatherbase.com/weather/weather-
summary.php3?s=404214&cityname=Denton,+Texas,+United+States+of+America
Discover Denton. 2019. Denton Convention & Visitors Bureau: A Division of the Denton Chamber of
Commerce. Retrieved from https://www.discoverdenton.com/groups/why-choose-denton/
Dwyer, et al. Assessing the Benefits and Costs of the Urban Forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18(5):
September 1992.
Ellison, D. et al. 2017. Trees, forests and water: Cool insights for a hot world. Global Environmental Change.
Volume 43. Pages 51-61. ISSN 09593780.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.01.002. Retrieved from:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378017300134
Emerald Ash Borer Information Network. 2019. http://www.emeraldashborer.info/
Fernández-Juricic, Esteban. 2001. Avifaunal use of Wooded Streets in an Urban Landscape. Conservation
Biology. Volume 14, Issue 2, pages 513-521. Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/
abs/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98600.x
Gilstad-Hayden et al. 2015. Greater tree canopy cover is associated with lower rates of both violent and
property crime in New Haven, CT. Landscape and Urban Planning. Volume 143.
Gilman and Watson. 1994. United States Forest Service. Retrieved from: http://hort.ufl.edu/database/
documents/pdf/tree_fact_sheets/questea.pdf
Grayston, S. J., Vaughan, D., and Jones, D. 1997. Rhizosphere carbon flow in trees, in comparison with
annual plants: the importance of root exudation and its impact on microbial activity and nutrient availability.
Applied soil ecology, 5(1), 29-56.
Greenhouse Gases’ Effect on the Climate. 2018. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Retrieved from:
https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=environment_how_ghg_affect_climate
Haddad, et al. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth ecosystems. Science Advances.
1. e1500052. 10.1126/sciadv.1500052.
Heisler GM. 1986. Energy Savings with Trees. J Arbor 12(5):113–125. Heisler GM., and DeWalle, O.R. 1968.
“Effects of windbreak structure on wind flow: Agriculture Ecosystems and Environments, 22123, pp. 41-69.
Appendix A: References
Adopt a Town; Pinckneyville (Denton). Texas State Historical Association. Retrieved on: 30 October 2019.
Retrieved from: https://tshasecurepay.com/land-rush/town/12094/Pinckneyville/
Akbari, H., D. Kurn, et al. 1997. Peak power and cooling energy savings of shade trees. Energy and Buildings
25:139–148.
Arbor Day Foundation, 2019. Tree City USA. Retrieved December 11, 2019 from https://www.arborday.org/
programs/treecityusa/
Associated Press & Kera News. 2018. “Homes Evacuated, Roads Closed Due To North Texas Wildfires.
Retrieved from https://www.keranews.org/post/homes-evacuated-roads-closed-due-north-texas-wildfires
Atkinson, T.H., J.L. Foltz, R.C. Wilkinson, and R.F. Mizell. 2000. Florida Insect Management Guide for insect
borers of trees and shrubs. University of Florida. Entomology Circular 310. http://entnemdept.ufl.edu/
creatures/trees/asian_ambrosia_beetle.htm
Bates, Edward (1918). History and Reminiscences of Denton County. Denton, Texas: McNitzky Printing
Company. LCCN 19004337. OCLC 2133818.
Berlinger, Joshua. 2012. “The 10 Best Small Tows in America”. Business Insider. https://www.
businessinsider.com/the-ten-best-small-towns-in-america-2012-11#1-denton-texas-10
City of Denton, Texas Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2017
Clark JR, Matheny NP, Cross G, Wake V. 1997. A Model of Urban Forest Sustainability. J Arbor 23(1):17-30.
Clatterbuck and Tankersley, n.d. Watering Trees. Texas A & M AgriLIfe Extension. Retrieved November 8, 2019
from https://agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/water/files/2013/04/how-much-to-water-trees.pdf
Cochran, Mike. 2013. Denton History. Retrieved from: http://www.dentonhistory.net/page16/styled/styled-5/
Cole, K.W. 2008. Granulate Ambrosia Beetle. Indiana Department of Natural Resources. http://www.in.gov/
dnr/entomolo/files/ep-GranulateAmbrosiaBeetleFactsheet.pdf
Cooke, B., Williams, D., Paveglio, T., and M. Carroll. 2016. Living with fire: How social scientists are helping
wildland-urban interface communities reduce wildfire risk. Science You Can Use Bulletin, Issue 19. Fort
Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Research Station. 9 p.
Dawson, Bill. 2018. “California’s in the 2018 spotlight for wildfires, but Texas has the most”. Texas Climate
News. Retrieved from http://texasclimatenews.org/?p=15225
Appendices:
Texas 63
123
Leff, Michael. 2016. The Sustainable Urban Forest: A Step-by-Step Approach. Davey Institute and
USDA Forest Service. http://www.itreetools.org/resources/content/Sustainable_Urban_Forest_
Guide_14Nov2016.pdf
Lyle, J.T., 1996. Regenerative design for sustainable development. John Wiley & Sons.
Lovasi et al. 2008
Matsuoka, Rodney. 2010. Student performance and high school landscapes: Examining the links.
Landscape and Urban Planning. 97. 273-282
McBride and Appel. 2019. Rapid Decline of Post Oaks in Texas. Texas A&M Agrilife Extension. Retrieved
from: https://agrilifeextension.tamu.edu/library/landscaping/rapid-decline-of-post-oaks-in-texas/
McDonald et al. 2016. Planting Healthy Air: A global analysis of the role of urban trees in addressing
particulate matter pollution and extreme heat. The Nature Conservancy. Retrieved from https://
thoughtleadershipproduction.s3.amazonaws.com/2016/10/28/17/17/50/0615788b-8eaf-
4b4fa02a8819c68278ef/20160825_PHA_Report_FINAL.pdf
McPherson, E. 1994. Cooling urban heat islands with sustainable landscapes. In R. Platt, r. Rowntree, & P.
Muick (Eds.), The ecological city (pp. 151–171). Amherst; University of Massachusetts Press.
McPherson, E. and J. R. Simpson. 2010. The tree BVOC index. Elsevier. Environmental Pollution. 159. 2088–
2093. Retrieved from https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/mcpherson/psw_2011_mcpherson006.pdf
Miller, R. W. 1988. Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Monarch City USA. 2019. Monarch butterfly recovery, city by city. Retrieved December 11, 2019 from http://
monarchcityusa.com/
Newsletter of the ISA Texas Chapter. 2016. Vol. 40, No. 4. Retrieved from https://isatexas.com/wp-content/
uploads/2015/11/ISAT_Newsltr_Nov_2016.pdf
Odom, E. Dale. “Denton, Texas”. Handbook of Texas Online. Texas State Historical Association.
Retrieved 2009-10-21.
Oldfield, E. E., Felson, A. J., Wood, S. A., Hallett, R. A., Strickland, M. S., and Bradford, M. A. 2014. Positive
effects of afforestation efforts on the health of urban soils. Forest Ecology and Management, 313, 266-273.
Pena JCdC, Martello F, Ribeiro MC, Armitage RA, Young RJ, et al. (2017) Street trees reduce the negative
effects of urbanization on birds. PLOS ONE 12(3): e0174484.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174484
Handbook of Texas Online, E. Dale Odom, “DENTON, TX (DENTON COUNTY),” accessed July 24, 2019,
http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/hed05.
Hoisch, Mathew. 2019. The Parts and the Whole: A Co-Productionist Analysis of Urban Carbon Neutrality
(Bachelor Thesis). Harvard College. Cambridge, MA.
Hill, Laura. 2015. “Why Denton, TX, Is a Best Place to Live”. Livability. Retrieved from: https://livability.com/
tx/denton/real-estate/why-denton-tx-is-a-best-place-to-live
History of Denton. City of Denton. Retrieved from: https://www.cityofdenton.com/en-us/about-denton/
history-of-denton
Huang et al. 1990. The Wind-Shielding and Shading Effects of Trees on Residential Heating and Cooling
Requirements. ASHRAE Winter Meeting, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning
Engineers. Atlanta, Georgia.
i-Tree Design. V7.0. 2019. Retrieved from: design.itreetools.org
i-Tree Planting. v2.0.0. 2019. Retrieved from: planting.itreetools.org
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) update. 2018. Report No. Informal Staff report to Mayor and City
Council. 2018-110. Retrieved December 11, 2019 from https://lfpubweb.cityofdenton.com/PublicWeblink/4/
edoc/14587/2018-110%20Integrated%20Pest%20Management%20Update.pdf
Jakes, P. J., Esposito, C., Burns, S., Cheng, A. S., Nelson, K. C., Sturtevant, V. E., and Williams, D. R. 2012. Best
management practices for creating a Community Wildfire Protection Plan. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-89. Newtown
Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 27 p., 89, 1-27.
Jennings, V., and Gaither, C.J. Approaching Environmental Health Disparities and Green Spaces: An
Ecosystem Services Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 1952-1968.
Karl, Tom, P. Harley, L. Emmons, B. Thornton, A. Guenther, C. Basu, A. Turnipseed, K. Jardine. Efficient
Atmospheric Cleansing of Oxidized Organic Trace Gases by Vegetation. October 2010. Web 11/9/2010.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/330/6005/816>
Keep Denton Beautiful. 2019. Celebrate Arbor Day at Keep Denton Beautiful’s Redbud Festival Press
Release. Retrieved from https://kdb.org/w/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Redbud-Festival-Press-
Release-2019.pdf
Krauss, Clifford (November 5, 2014). Split Decision by Voters on Local Fracking Bans. The New York Times.
Kuo, F.E. and Sullivan, W.C., 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime?
Environment and behavior, 33(3), pp.343-367.
Appendices:
64 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
124
Appendices
Planning the Urban Forest: Ecology, Economy, and Community Development. 2009. American Planning
Association. Edited by Schwab, James. Retrieved from https://planning-orguploadedmedia.s3.amazonaws.
com/legacy_resources/research/forestry/pdf/555.pdf
Post Oak Tree Preservation at UNT. 2018. Facilities. University of North Texas. Retrieved from https://
facilities.unt.edu/news/post-oak-tree-preservation-unt
The Post Oaks. 2019. “Why is the Post oak is so important t the Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex?”. Friends of
the Randol Mill Park Natural Area. Retrieved from http://www.thepostoaks.org/pdf/Importance-of-the-Post-
Oak-in-DFW.pdf
Sallee, Marilyn. 2011. “The many beneficial traits of cedar elm”. Native Plan Society of Texas. Retrieved from
https://npsot.org/wp/story/2011/1687/
Sherer, P.M., 2003. Why America Needs More City Parks and Open Space, San Francisco: The Trust
for Public Land. Available at: http://www.tpl.org/content_documents/parks_for_people_Jan2004.pdf
[Accessed March 8, 2010].
Shiloh Field Community Garden. 2019. About the Garden. Retrieved from http://shilohfield.com/
State of the Denton Urban Forest Report. 2016. Preservation Tree Services. Texas Trees Foundation. Plan-It Geo.
Stransky, J.J. n.d. Post Oak. United States Department of Agriculture Southern Research Station. Retrieved
on 30 October 2019. Retrieved from https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/misc/ag_654/volume_2/quercus/
stellata.htm
Texas A&M Forest Service, 2019a. Forest Health: Oak Wilt. https://tfsweb.tamu.edu/oakwiltfaqs/
Texas A&M Forest Service, 2019b. Forest Health: Emerald Ash Borer. https://tfsweb.tamu.edu/eab/
Texas Agriculture Daily. 2016. “What’s causing widespread, rapid post oak decline?”. Texas Farm Bureau.
Retrieved from https://texasfarmbureau.org/whats-causing-widespread-rapid-post-oak-decline/
Texas Almanac: City Population History from 1850–2000. Retrieved on 4 November 2019. Retrieved from
https://texasalmanac.com/sites/default/files/images/CityPopHist%20web.pdf
Texas Department of Agriculture. 2013. Chapter 19: Quarantines and noxious and invasive plants. Retrieved
December 11, 2019 from https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/fids/201300604-1.html
Texas Parks & Wildlife. N.d. ”Life After Wildfire: The Future of Bastrop State Park”. Retrieved from https://
tpwd.texas.gov/spdest/findadest/parks/bastrop/fire/
Texas State Library and Archives Commission. 2019. Official Capital Designations. Retrieved from https://
www.tsl.texas.gov/ref/abouttx/capitals.html
Thomas, Rusty. 2009. El Camino Real Chapter of the Texas master Naturalist Program Milam County Nature
Resource Book. Retrieved from http://txmn.org/elcamino/files/2010/03/Post-Oak-Tree.pdf
Threlfall, Caragh & Williams, Nicholas & Hahs, Amy & J. Livesley, Stephen. 2016. Approaches to urban
vegetation management and the impacts on urban bird and bat assemblages. Landscape and Urban
Planning. 153. 28-39. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.011.
Troy, Austin; Grove, J. Morgan; O’Neil-Dunne, Jarlath. 2012. The relationship between tree canopy and crime
rates across an urban-rural gradient in the greater Baltimore region. Landscape and Urban Planning. 106:
262-270.
Turner, Matt Warnock. Remarkable Plants of Texas: Uncommon Accounts of Our Common Natives.
University of Texas Press. January 1, 2010. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books
US Census-”Denton (city), Texas”. United States Census Bureau. 2012-01-31. Archived from the original on
2011-01-05. Retrieved 2012-05-16.
Wylie, Melissa (April 4, 2014). “Largest community garden in U.S. feeds the hungry in Denton”. The Dallas
Morning News. James M. Moroney III. Retrieved 2 August 2015. Retrieved from http://www.dallasnews.
com/news/metro/20140404-largest-community-garden-in-u.s.-feeds-needy-in-denton.ece
The Xerces Society, Inc. 2018. Bee City USA. Retrieved December 11, 2019 from https://www.beecityusa.org/
Uthappa, A. R., Chavan, S. B., Dhyani, S. K., Handa, A. K., and Newaj, R. 2015. Trees for soil health and. Indian
Farming, 65(3), 02-05.
Xiao, Q., McPherson, E.G., Simpson, J.R., Ustin, S.L. 1998. Rainfall Interception by Sacramento’s Urban
Forest. Journal of Arboriculture. 24(4): 235-244.
Texas 65
125
Appendix B:
Terms and Definitions
American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
A Federation of United States industry sectors
(e.g. businesses, professional societies and trade
associations, standards developers, government
agencies, institutes, and consumer / labor interest
groups) that coordinates the development of the
voluntary consensus standards system.
American Public Works Association (APWA)
An organization that supports professionals
who operate, improve, or maintain public works
infrastructure by advocating to increase awareness,
and providing education, credentialing, as well as
other professional development opportunities.
Arboriculture
The science, art, technology, and business of tree care.
Best Management Practices (BMP)
Management practices and processes used when
conducting forestry operations, implemented to
promote environmental integrity.
Capital Improvement Projects (CIP)
Infrastructure projects and equipment purchases
identified by a government in order to maintain
or improve public resources. Projects such as (1)
constructing a facility, (2) expanding, renovating,
replacing, or rehabilitating an existing facility, or
(3) purchasing major equipment are identified, and
then purchasing plans and development schedules
are developed.
Climate Action Plan (CAP)
Government lead initiatives to decrease
greenhouse gas emissions and prepare for the
impacts of climate change.
Community Urban Forest
The collection of publicly owned trees within an
urban area, including street trees and trees in parks
and other public facilities.
Drip Line Area
The area measured from the trunk of the tree
outward to a point at the perimeter of the
outermost branch structure of the tree.
Dutch Elm Disease (DED)
A wilt disease of elm trees caused by plant
pathogenic fungi. The disease is either spread by
bark beetles or tree root grafts.
Emerald Ash Borer (EAB)
The common name for Agrilus planipennis, an
emerald green wood boring beetle native to
northeastern Asia and invasive to North America. It
feeds on all species of ash.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
A gas that traps heat in Earth’s atmosphere.
Geographic Information System (GIS)
Computer-based tools designed to increase the
organization and understanding of spatial or
geographic data. Many different kinds of data can
be displayed on one map for visualization and
interpretation.
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Using pest and environmental information to
determine if pest control actions are warranted.
Pest control methods (e.g. biological control,
habitat manipulation, cultural control, plant
resistance, and chemical control) are chosen based
on economic and safety considerations.
i-Tree
A state-of-the-art, peer-reviewed software suite
from the USDA Forest Service that provides
urban and rural forestry analysis and benefits
assessment tools.
International Society of Arboriculture (ISA)
An international nonprofit organization that
supports professionals in the field of arboriculture
by providing professional development
opportunities, disseminating applicable research
findings, and promoting the profession.
Landmark Tree
A healthy tree that is designated by the property
owner on the Texas Big Tree Registry regardless if
the tree is protected or a non-protected tree; or a
tree designated as a historic tree where an event
of historic significance occurred that had local,
regional, or national importance; or at the home
of a citizen who is famous on a local, regional, or
national basis; or that has taken on a legendary
stature in the community, is mentioned in literature
or documents of historic value, or is considered
unusual due to size, age, or other landmark status.
Historic trees shall be designated following the
historic landmark designation.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
A United States federal law adopted to protect
migratory birds.
Natural Area
A defined area where native trees and vegetation
are allowed to grow and reproduce naturally with
little or no management except for control of
undesirable and invasive species.
Oak Wilt
A tree disease caused by the fungus Ceratocystis
fagacearum. It is spread by sap feeding beetles
and tree root grafts.
Open Space
A defined area of undeveloped land that is open
to the public. The land can include native or
naturalized trees and vegetation.
Plant Health Care (PHC)
A program that consists of (1) routinely monitoring
landscape plant health and (2) individualized
plant management recommendations in order to
maintain or improve the vitality, appearance, and
safety of trees and other plants.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Equipment worn to enhance workplace safety
and minimize the risk to physical hazards (e.g.
gloves, hard harts, bodysuits, and foot, eye, or ear
protection).
Private Tree
Any tree located on private property, including
residential and commercial parcels.
Appendices:
66 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
126
Appendices
Protected Tree
Landmark, heritage, quality, or secondary trees.
Quality Tree
Healthy non-secondary tree, except Post Oaks, that
measure between six and 18 inches dbh.
Public Tree
Any tree located in the public ROW, city park, and/
or city facility.
Right Tree, Right Place
Careful planning for the planting of a tree.
Considerations for whether a tree is the right
tree and whether it is planted in the right
place, include: mature height, canopy spread,
deciduous/evergreen, form/shape, growth rate,
soil requirements, light requirements, water
requirements, fruit debris, and hardiness zone.
Secondary Tree
A healthy Ash, Bois D’ Arc, Hackberry, or
Cottonwood tree, with a dbh greater than six inches.
Street Tree
Any tree growing within the tree maintenance strip
whether or not planted by the city.
Structural and Training Pruning
Pruning to develop a sound and desirable scaffold
branch structure in a tree and to reduce the
likelihood of branch failure.
Tree Canopy
The layer of leaves, branches, and stems of trees
that cover the ground when viewed from above.
Tree City USA
A program through the Arbor Day Foundation that
advocates for green urban areas through enhanced
tree planting and care.
Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ)
An International Society of Arboriculture
qualification. Upon completion of this training,
tree care professionals demonstrate proficiency in
assessing tree risk.
Urban Forest
The collection of privately owned and publicly
owned trees and woody shrubs that grow within an
urban area.
Urban Forest Master Plan (PLAN)
A document that provides a comprehensive
information, recommendations, and timelines
to guide for the efficient and safe management
of a city’s tree canopy. The Plan uses adaptive
management model to provide reasoned and
transparent calls to action from an inventory of
existing resources.
Urban Forestry
The cultivation and management of native or
introduced trees and related vegetation in urban
areas for their present and potential contribution
to the economic, physiological, sociological, and
ecological well-being of urban society.
Urban Tree Canopy Assessment (UTC)
A document based off of GIS mapping data that
provides a birds-eye view of the entire urban forest
and establishes a tree canopy baseline of known
accuracy. The UTC helps managers understand the
quantity and distribution of existing tree canopy,
potential impacts of tree planting and removal,
quantified annual benefits trees provide to the
community, and benchmark canopy percent values.
Wildfire Urban Interface (WUI)
A transition zone where homes are located on the
edge of fire prone areas, and are at an increased
risk of personal injury or property damage resulting
from a wildfire.
Appendix C:
Industry Standards
ANSI Z133 SAFETY STANDARD, 2017
Reviews general safety, electrical hazards, use of
vehicles and mobile equipment, portable power
hand tools, hand tools and ladders, climbing, and
work procedures.
ANSI A300
ANSI A300 standards represent the industry
consensus on performing tree care operations.
The standards can be used to prepare tree care
contract specifications.
ANSI A300 Pruning Standard-Part 1, 2017
ANSI A300 Soil Management-Part 2, 2011
ANSI A300 Support Systems Standard-Part 3, 2013
ANSI A300 Construction Management Standard-
Part 5, 2012
ANSI A300 Transplanting Standard-Part 6, 2012
ANSI A300 Integrated Vegetation Management
Standard-Part 7, 2012
ANSI A300 Root Management Standard-Part 8, 2013
ANSI A300 Tree Risk Assessment Standard. Tree
Failure-Part 9, 2017
ANSI A300 Integrated Pest Management-
Part 10, 2016
Includes guidelines for implementing IPM
programs, including standards for Integrated Pest
Management, IPM Practices, tools and equipment,
and definition.
Texas 67
127
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs)
Integrated Pest Management, Second Edition,
P. Eric Wiseman and Michael J. Raupp 2016
Provides a comprehensive overview of the basic
definitions, concepts, and practices that pertain
to landscape Integrated Pest Management (IPM).
The publication provides specific information for
designing, planning, and implementing an IPM
program as part of a comprehensive Plant Health
Care (PHC) management system, including topics
such as:
• IPM Concepts and Definitions
• Action Thresholds
• Monitoring Tools and Techniques
• Preventive Tactics
• Control Tactics
• Documentation and Recordkeeping
Integrated Vegetation Management, Second
Edition, Randall H. Miller, 2014
A guide to the selection and application of methods
and techniques for vegetation control for electric
rights-of-way projects and gas pipeline rights-
of-way. Topics included: safety, site evaluations,
action thresholds, evaluation and selection of
control methods, implementing control methods,
monitoring treatment and quality assurance,
environmental protection, tree pruning and removal,
and a glossary of terms.
Managing Trees During Construction, Second
Edition, Kelby Fite and E. Thomas Smiley, 2016
Describes tree conservation and preservation
practices that help to protect selected trees
throughout the construction planning and
development process so that they will continue to
provide benefits for decades after site disturbance,
including planning phase, design phase, pre-
construction phase, construction phase, and post-
construction phase.
Plant Health Care for Woody Ornamental: A
Professional’s Guide to Preventing and Managing
Environmental Stresses and Pests, Developed in
partnership with the USDA Forest Service, 1997
A comprehensive manual on plant health
maintenance, which includes information on basic
biology of woody plants, understanding stress and
pest complexes, abiotic disorders and diseases,
management of insect and vertebrate pests, weed
management, and working with clients and the public.
Root Management, Larry Costello, Gary Watson,
and Tom Smiley, 2017
Recommended practices for inspecting, pruning, and
directing the roots of trees in urban environments
to promote their longevity, while minimizing
infrastructure conflicts.
Special companion publication to the ANSI A300 Part
8: Tree, Shrub, and Other Woody Plant Management–
Standard Practices (Root Management)
Tree Planting, Second Edition, Gary Watson, 2014
Provides processes for tree planting, including site
and species selection, planting practices, post-
planting pruning, and early tree care. Other topics
included are time of planting, nursery stock (types,
selection, and handling), preparing the planting
hole, planting practices, root loss and new root
growth, redevelopment of root structure, pruning,
palms, after planting, final inspection, and a
glossary of terms.
Tree Inventories, Second Edition, Jerry Bond, 2013
Provides considerations for managing large
numbers of trees considered as individuals rather
than groups and serves as guide for making
informed decisions that align with inventory goals
with needs and resources, including inventory goals
and objectives, benefits and costs, types, work
specifications, and maintaining inventory quality.
Tree Risk Assessment, Second Edition, E. Thomas
Smiley, Nelda Matheny, and Sharon Lilly, 2017
A guide for assessing tree risk as accurately and
consistently as possible, to evaluate that risk,
and to recommend measures that achieve an
acceptable level of risk, including topics such as:
risk assessment basics, levels and scope of tree risk
assessment, assessing targets, sites, and trees, tree
risk categorization, risk mitigation (preventive and
remedial actions), risk reporting, tree related conflicts
that can be a source of risk, loads on trees, structural
defects and conditions that affect likelihood of failure,
response growth, and description of selected types of
advanced tree risk assessments.
Tree Shrub Fertilization, Third Edition, E. Thomas
Smiley, Sharon Lilly, and Patrick Kelsey, 2013
Aids in the selection and application of fertilizers
for trees and shrubs, including essential elements,
determining goals and objectives of fertilization, soil
testing and plan analysis, fertilizer selection, timing,
application, application area, rates, storage and
handling of fertilizer, sample fertilizer contract for
commercial/municipal clients.
Soil Management, Bryant Scharenbroch, E. Thomas
Smiley, and Wes Kocher, 2014
Focuses on the protection and restoration of soil
quality that support trees and shrubs in the urban
environment, including goals of soil management,
assessment, sampling, and analysis, modifications
and amendments, tillage, conservation, and a
glossary of terms.
Utility Pruning of Trees, Geoffrey P. Kempter, 2004
Describes the current best practices in utility tree
pruning based on scientific research and proven
methodology for the safe and reliable delivery of
utility services, while preventing unnecessary injury
to trees. An overview of safety, tools and equipment,
pruning methods and practices, and emergency
restoration are included.
AMERICAN PUBLIC
WORKS ASSOCIATION
The American Public Works Association (APWA)
produces manuals for agencies of any size and
with a range of responsibilities to use in order
to develop policies and procedures necessary
to perform as full-service public works agency.
In addition to the Public Works Management
Practices Manual (currently in its ninth edition),
APWA publishes a series of pocket guides.
Tree Protection & Preservation: A Pocket Guide of
Best Management Practices
The Tree Protection & Preservation Pocket Guide
provides basic and practical information on how
to manage trees at-risk in construction areas.
These Best Management Practices help to give
trees the best chance of survival before and after
construction.
68 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
128
Appendices
Appendix D: Soil Volume
& Tree Stature
Tree growth is limited by soil volume. Larger stature
trees require larger volumes of uncompacted soil
to reach mature size and canopy spread (Casey
Trees, 2008).
Appendices:
Appendix E: Alternative
Planter Designs
Stormwater tree pits are designed to collect runoff
from streets, parking lots, and other impervious
areas. Stormwater is directed into scuppers that flow
into below-grade planters that then allow stormwater
to infiltrate soils to supplement irrigation.
Texas 69
129
Appendices:
Tree Protection Zone – Example
70 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
130
71
Appendices:
Tree Protection Zone – Example
DefinitionsTexas
131
Appendices:
Appendix F:
Indicators of a
Sustainable
Urban Forest
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XRegional Collaboration
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Condition of Public Trees - Natural Areas
Urban Tree Canopy
Trees on Private Property
Equitable Distribution
Species Diversity
Size/Age Distribution
Suitability
Condition of Public Trees - Streets, Parks
Soil Volume
Indicators of a Sustainable Urban Forest
TotalsTHE TREESTHE PLAYERSTHE MGMT APPROACHTree Inventory
Utility Engagement
Tree Protection Policy
Canopy Assessment
Developer Engagement
City Staffing and Equipment
Management Plan
Public Awareness
Funding
Risk Management Program
Disaster Preparedness & Response
Communications
Maintenance of Publicly-Owned Trees (ROWs)
Planting Program
Neighborhood Action
Large Private & Institutional Landholder Involvement
Green Industry Involvement
Funder Engagement
Number of Species Exceeding 10%
Table 3: A Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators Combined Results
X
X
2
X
X
X
X
X
15
X
X
X
X
13
HighMediumLow
Assessed Performance Level
72 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
132
Urban Tree Canopy Achieve the desired tree canopy cover according to goals set
for the entire city and neighborhoods.
Alternatively, achieve 75% of the total canopy possible for the
entire city and in each neighborhood.”
Canopy is decreasing.
- and/or -
No canopy goals have been set.
Canopy is not dropping, but not on a
trajectory to achieve the established goal.
Canopy goal is achieved, or well on the way
to achievement.
Space and Soil Volume Establish minimum street tree soil volume requirements to
ensure there is adequate space and soil for street trees to
thrive. Minimum soil volumes by mature size: 1000 cubic feet
for large trees; 600 cubic feet for medium trees; 300 cubic feet
for small trees.
Minimum street tree soil volumes have not
been established.
Minimum street tree soil volume has been
established based on mature size of tree.
Minimum street tree soil volumes have been
established and are required to be adhered
to for all new street tree planting projects.
HighMediumLow
Indicators of a Sustainable
Urban Forest
Overall Objective or Industry
Standard
Performance Levels
73Definitions
Age of Trees
(Size and Age Distribution)
Establish a diverse-aged population of public trees across the
entire city and for each neighborhood. Ideal standard:
0-8”” DBH: 40% 9-17”” DBH: 30%
18-24”” DBH: 20% Over 24”” DBH: 10%
No current information is available on size.
- OR -
Age distribution is not proportionally
distributed across size classes at the city
level.
Size classes are evenly distributed at the
city level, though unevenly distributed at the
neighborhood level.
Age distribution is generally aligned with
the ideal standard diameter classes at the
neighborhood level.
Condition of
Publicly-Owned
Natural Areas
(trees managed extensively)
Possess a detailed understanding of the ecological structure
and function of all publicly-owned natural areas (such as
woodlands, ravines, stream corridors, etc.), as well as usage
patterns.
No current information is available on tree
condition or risk.
Publicly-owned natural areas are identified
in a sample-based “natural areas survey” or
similar data.
Information from a current, GIS-based,
100% complete natural areas survey is
utilized to document ecological structure
and function, as well as usage patterns.
Diversity Establish a genetically diverse population of publicly-owned
trees across the entire city and for each neighborhood. Tree
populations should be comprised of no more than 30% of any
family, 20% of any genus, or 10% of any species.
No current information is available on
species.
- OR -
Fewer than five species dominate the entire
tree population citywide.
No species represents more than 20% of
the entire tree population citywide.
No species represents more than 10% of the
entire tree population citywide.
Location of Canopy
(Equitable Distribution)
Achieve low variation between tree canopy and equity factors
citywide by neighborhood. Ensure that the benefits of tree
canopy are available to all, especially for those most affected
by these benefits.
Tree planting and public outreach and
education is not determined by tree canopy
cover or benefits.
Tree planting and public outreach and
education is focused on neighborhoods
with low tree canopy.
Tree planting and public outreach and
education is focused in neighborhoods with
low tree canopy and a high need for tree
benefits.
Condition of
Publicly Owned Trees
(trees managed
intensively)
Possess a detailed understanding of tree condition and
potential risk of all intensively-managed, publicly-owned trees.
This information is used to direct maintenance actions.
No current information is available on tree
condition or risk.
Information from a partial or sample or
inventory is used to assess tree condition
and risk.
Information from a current, GIS-based,
100% complete public tree inventory is used
to indicate tree condition and risk.
Trees on Private Property Possess a solid understanding of the extent, location and
general condition of trees on private lands.
No data is available on private trees.Current tree canopy assessment reflects
basic information (location) of both public
and private canopy combined.
Detailed information available on private
trees. Ex. bottom-up sample-based
assessment of trees.
Climate Resilience/
Suitability
Establish a tree population suited to the urban environment
and adapted to the overall region. Suitable species are gauged
by exposure to imminent threats, considering the “Right Tree
for the Right Place” concept and invasive species.
No current information is available on
species suitability.
- OR -
Less than 50% of trees are considered
suitable for the site.
50% to 75% of trees are considered suitable
for the site.
More than 75% of trees are considered
suitable for the site.
THE TREES
Table 4: A Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators: The Trees
Texas
133
Neighborhood Action Citizens understand, cooperate, and participate in urban forest
management at the neighborhood level. Urban forestry is a
neighborhood-scale issue.
Little or no citizen involvement or
neighborhood action.
Some active groups are engaged in
advancing urban forestry activity, but with no
unified set of goals or priorities.
The majority of all neighborhoods are
organized, connected, and working towards
a unified set of goals and priorities.
Regional Collaboration Neighboring communities and regional groups are actively
cooperating and interacting to advance the region’s stake in the
city’s urban forest.
Little or no interaction between neighboring
communities and regional groups.
Neighboring communities and regional
groups share similar goals and policy
vehicles related to trees and the urban
forest.
Regional urban forestry planning,
coordination, and management is
widespread.
HighMediumLow
Indicators of a Sustainable
Urban Forest
Overall Objective or Industry
Standard
Performance Levels
Green Industry Involvement The green industry works together to advance citywide urban
forest goals and objectives. The city and its partners capitalize
on local green industry expertise and innovation.
Little or no involvement from green industry
leaders to advance local urban forestry
goals.
Some partnerships are in place to advance
local urban forestry goals, but more often for
the short-term.
Long-term committed partnerships are
working to advance local urban forestry
goals.
Funder Engagement Possess a detailed understanding of the ecological structure
and function of all publicly-owned natural areas (such as
woodlands, ravines, stream corridors, etc.), as well as usage
patterns.
Local funders are engaged and invested
in urban forestry initiatives. Funding is
adequate to implement citywide urban forest
management plan.
Little or no funders are engaged in urban
forestry initiatives.
Funders are engaged in urban forestry
initiatives at minimal levels for short-term
projects. Multiple funders are fully engaged
and active in urban forestry initiatives for
short-term projects and long-term goals.
State Engagement State departments/agencies are aware of and vested in the
urban forest and cooperates to advance citywide urban forest
goals and objectives.
State departments/agencies and City
agencies act independently of urban forestry
efforts. No coordination exists.
State department/agencies and City
agencies have engaged in dialogues about
urban forestry efforts with respect to capital
improvement and infrastructure projects.
State departments/agencies, City agencies,
and other stakeholders integrate and
collaborate on all urban forestry efforts,
including planning, site work, and outreach/
education.
Large Private & Institutional
Landholder Involvement
Large, private, and institutional landholders embrace citywide
goals and objectives through targeted resource management
plans.
Large private land holders are unaware of
issues and potential influence in the urban
forest. No large private land management
plans are currently in place.
Education materials and advice is available
to large private landholders. Few large
private landholders or institutions have
management plans in place.
Clear and concise goals are established
for large private land holders through
direct education and assistance programs.
Key landholders and institutions have
management plans in place.
City Department and
Agency Cooperation
All city departments and agencies cooperate to advance
citywide urban forestry goals and objectives.
Conflicting goals and/or actions among city
departments and agencies.
Informal teams among departments
and agencies are communicating and
implementing common goals on a project-
specific basis.
Common goals and collaboration occur
across all departments and agencies. City
policy and actions are implemented by
formal interdepartmental and interagency
working teams on all city projects.
Utility Engagement All utilities are aware of and vested in the urban forest and
cooperates to advance citywide urban forest goals and
objectives.
Utilities and city agencies act independently
of urban forestry efforts. No coordination
exists.
Utilities and city agencies have engaged
in dialogues about urban forestry efforts
with respect to capital improvement and
infrastructure projects.
Utilities, city agencies, and other
stakeholders integrate and collaborate on
all urban forestry efforts, including planning,
site work, and outreach/education.
Public Awareness The general public understands the benefits of trees and
advocates for the role and importance of the urban forest.
Trees are generally seen as a nuisance, and
thus, a drain on city budgets and personal
paychecks.
Trees are generally recognized as important
and beneficial.
Trees are seen as valuable infrastructure
and vital to the community’s well-being.
The urban forest is recognized for the
unique environmental, economic, and social
services its provides to the community.
THE PLAYERS
Table 5: A Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators: The Players
74 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
134
Tree Inventory Comprehensive, GIS-based, current inventory of all intensively-
managed public trees to guide management, with mechanisms in
place to keep data current and available for use. Data allows for
analysis of age distribution, condition, risk, diversity, and suitability.
No inventory or out-of-date inventory of
publicly-owned trees.
Partial or sample-based inventory of publicly-
owned trees, inconsistently updated.
Complete, GIS-based inventory of publicly-owned
trees, updated on a regular, systematic basis.
Management Plan Existence and buy-in of a comprehensive urban forest management
plan to achieve city-wide goals. Re-evaluation is conducted every 5 to
10 years.
No urban forest management plan
exists.
A plan for the publicly-owned forest resource
exists but is limited in scope, acceptance, and
implementation.
A comprehensive plan for the publicly owned
forest resource exists and is accepted and
implemented.
Maintenance Program of
Publicly-Owned Trees
(trees managed intensively)
All intensively-managed, publicly-owned trees are well maintained for
optimal health & condition in order to extend longevity & maximize benefits.
A reasonable cyclical pruning program is in place, generally targeting 5–7
year cycles. Maintenance program is outlined in the management plan.
Request-based, reactive system. No
systematic pruning program is in place
for publicly-owned trees.
All publicly-owned trees are systematically
maintained, but pruning cycle is inadequate.
All publicly-owned trees are proactively and
systematically maintained and adequately
pruned on a cyclical basis.
Planting Program Comprehensive and effective tree planting and establishment program
is driven by canopy cover goals, equity considerations, and other
priorities according to the plan. Tree planting and establishment is
outlined in the management plan.
Tree establishment is ad hoc.Tree establishment is consistently funded and
occurs on an annual basis.
Tree establishment is directed by needs derived
from a tree inventory and other community
plans and is sufficient in meeting canopy cover
objectives.
City Staffing
and Equipment
Adequate staff and access to the equipment and vehicles to implement
the management plan. A high level urban forester or planning
professional, strong operations staff, and solid certified arborist
technicians.
Insufficient staffing levels,
insufficiently-trained staff, and/or
inadequate equipment and vehicle
availability.
Certified arborists and professional urban
foresters on staff have some professional
development, but are lacking adequate staff
levels or adequate equipment.
Multi-disciplinary team within the urban forestry unit,
including an urban forestry professional, operations
manager, and arborist technicians. Vehicles and
equipment are sufficient to complete required work.
Canopy Assessment Accurate, high-resolution, and recent assessment of existing
and potential city-wide tree canopy cover that is regularly updated
and available for use across various departments, agencies,
and/or disciplines.
No tree canopy assessement.Sample-based canopy cover assessment, or
dated (over 10 years old) high resolution canopy
assessment.
High-resolution tree canopy assessment using
aerial photographs or satellite imagery.
Risk Management Program All publicly-owned trees are managed for maximum public safety by
way of maintaining a city-wide inventory, conducting proactive annual
inspections, and eliminating hazards within a set timeframe based on risk
level. Risk management program is outlined in the management plan.
Request-based, reactive system. The
condition of publicly-owned trees is
unknown.
There is some degree of risk abatement thanks
to knowledge of condition of publicly-owned
trees, though generally still managed as a
request-based reactive system.
There is a complete tree inventory with risk
assessment data and a risk abatement program
in effect. Hazards are eliminated within a set
time period depending on the level of risk.
Maintenance Program of
Publicly-Owned Natural Areas
(trees managed extensively)
The ecological structure and function of all publicly-owned natural
areas are protected and enhanced while accommodating public use
where appropriate.
No natural areas management plans
are in effect.
Only reactive management efforts to facilitate
public use (risk abatement).
Management plans are in place for each publicly-
owned natural area focused on managing
ecological structure and function and facilitating
public use.
Tree Protection Policy Comprehensive and regularly updated tree protection ordinance
with enforcement ability is based on community goals. The benefits
derived from trees on public and private property are ensured by the
enforcement of existing policies.
No tree protection policy.Policies are in place to protect trees, but the
policies are not well-enforced or ineffective.
Protections policies ensure the safety of trees on
public and private land. The policies are enforced
and supported by significant deterrents and
shared ownership of city goals.
Funding Appropriate funding in place to fully implement both proactive and
reactive needs based on a comprehensive urban forest management
plan.
Funding comes from the public sector
only, and covers only reactive work.
Funding levels (public and private) generally
cover mostly reactive work. Low levels of risk
management and planting in place.
Dynamic, active funding from engaged private
partners and adequate public funding are used to
proactively manage and expand the urban forest.
Communication Effective avenues of two-way communication exist between the city
departments and between city and its citizens.
No avenues are in place. City departments
and public determine on an ad-hoc basis
the best messages and avenues to
communicate.
Avenues are in place, but used sporadically and
without coordination or only on a one-way basis.
Avenues are in place for two way communication,
are well-used with targeted, coordinated
messages.
Disaster Preparedness
& Response
A disaster management plan is in place related to the city’s urban
forest. The plan includes staff roles, contracts, response priorities,
debris management and a crisis communication plan. Staff are
regularly trained and/or updated.
No disaster response plan is in place.A disaster plan is in place, but pieces are
missing and/or staff are not regularly trained or
updated.
A robust disaster management plan is in place,
regularly updated and staff is fully trained on
roles and processes.
HighMediumLow
Indicators of a Sustainable
Urban Forest
Overall Objective or Industry
Standard
Performance Levels
75Definitions
THE MANAGEMENT APPROACH
Table 6: A Sustainable Urban Forest Indicators: The Management
Texas
135
Appendices:
Appendix
G: Property
Purchase
Decision
Criteria
Combined Score
Category Score
High Value Canopy/Species Trees provide numerous environmental benefits to the community. But not all trees provide the same level of benefits. Native
tree species and other significant species, recognized for their contribution to ecosystem benefits, are especially valuable. In
addition to providing wildlife habitat, native trees are well-adapted to the local climate and may require less maintenance and
less water than introduced species. Significant trees or high-value tree species may or may not be native trees but are significant
contributors to the overall diversity of the urban forest and significantly contribute to the overall environmental benefits. Other
considerations for what make a tree significant include: size, crown density, drought-tolerance, longevity, contributions to air
quality and stormwater capture, reducing energy consumption, and mitigating the effects of urban heat islands.
Canopy Cover Tree canopy provides numerous benefits to the community. Although, the quality of the canopy, i.e. health, and overall expanse
of the canopy impacts the overall environmental benefits.
Stormwater Benefits Higher impervious surfaces, characteristic of urban areas, result in increased surface runoff and nonpoint source pollution.
Stormwater management can add significantly to the cost of infrastructure a community must invest to manage/treat
stormwater. Trees and canopy capture stormwater, reduce runoff, increase soil percolation, and filter pollutants. Therefore,
trees can contribute to stormwater management and reduce the need for additional infrastructure. Additionally, trees along
streams, creeks, rivers, and man-made water management systems can stabilize the soils along the banks to reduce erosion.
Passive Recreation Open space areas and tree canopy promote engagement with nature and the outdoors, especially when they are easily
accessible and/or congruent with existing trails and greenbelts. Passive recreation (e.g., hiking, forest bathing) offer residents
an important respite from urban stress. Creating opportunities for passive recreation generally requires only minimal
development (e.g., signage, trail maintenance) and forestlands can be minimally managed with less impact on the ecosystem.
Brownfield land/Foreclosure Contaminated brownfield sites can sit unused for decades because the cost of cleaning the site is more than the value of the land
would be worth for redevelopment. Similarly, foreclosures may have debt beyond market feasibility. Additionally, sites may have EPA
liens, past taxes, and in severely deteriorated condition.
Forest Connectivity Forest connectivity promotes ecosystem functionality and biodiversity, and creates wildlife habitat and corridors for birds,
insects, and other animals. Strategic purchase of property that connects with and/or bridges existing core canopy, open space,
and/or greenbelts can greatly benefit wildlife and forest ecosystems.
Equitable Distribution Numerous studies have shown that tree canopy is not always equally distributed across communities. Often, in urban areas, these
discrepancies can be observed across socioeconomic and demographic lines. Tree canopy provides numerous environmental and
social benefits to the community, but if tree canopy is not proportionate, benefits provided by public trees are not enjoyed equitably.
Parcel size and shape Some parcels of land are subdivided over time. Sometimes remaining parcels are narrow, irregularly shaped, or are not large
enough to allow for building and development. Irregularly shaped and/or otherwise low-value parcels may be available at a
reduced price.
DESCRIPTIONPROPERTY CHARACTERISTIC
Purchasing property provides an opportunity to preserve trees
and set aside space for future tree plantings. It is important to
consider costs and the existing real-estate market along with
the following criteria when purchasing property.
76 DentonUrban Forest Master Plan
136
77Definitions
A combined score of 13 or less suggests the property will not likely
preserve or expand canopy cover.
A combined score of between 14 and 19 suggests the property may
preserve or expand canopy cover. Additional considerations may be
required before purchase.
A combined score of 20 or more suggests that property will likely preserve
and expand canopy cover.
Areas with a low score are assigned a value of 1. Areas with a moderate score are assigned a value of 2.Areas with a high score are assigned a value of 3.
Property has none or few native or significant trees. Property may include
a prevalence of invasive species or high- maintenance species that are not
well-adapted to the local climate.
Property has native or significant trees. May also include some invasive
or high- maintenance species where control is manageable. Health of the
trees are in fair or worse condition. May include valuable habitat/forage for
wildlife. May be adjacent to, or including, wetlands, rivers, streams, and/or
steep slopes, where canopy provides benefits to water quality, fish habitat,
and soil preservation.
Property is mostly populated by native or significant trees. Trees and canopy
are in overall fair or better condition. May also include high-value habitat/
forage for wildlife and/or threatened and endangered species. Is adjacent to,
or including, wetlands, rivers, streams, and/or steep slopes, where canopy
provides benefits to water quality, fish habitat, and soil preservation.
Tree canopy cover is not well understood; GIS land cover layer is not available/
existing. Canopy cover of property is estimated to be minimal (<20%). Health
of the overall canopy cover on the property is in less than fair condition.
Tree canopy is mapped through GIS land cover layer. Estimates indicate that
the property has at least a moderate level of tree canopy (20-35%) and in
mostly fair or better condition.
Tree canopy is understood through a GIS land cover layer. Tree canopy
coverage is high (>35% canopy cover) and the overall health is in fair or
better condition.
Property has high levels of impervious surface or bare soil, which increases
the effects of stormwater runoff or property is not located adjacent to water
bodies to positively contribute to reducing erosion.
Property has a mixture of both tree canopy and low-lying vegetation (shrubs
and grasses), which positively contribute to reducing stormwater runoff
OR property is adjacent to bodies of water or stormwater management
systems.
Property has a high level of canopy, which may be a mix of trees, shrubs,
and grasses AND is adjacent to bodies of water or stormwater management
systems, with a likelihood to reduce stormwater runoff and erosion.
Property is land-locked or not located in an area that would
easily transition to a state that would provide passive recreation
opportunities.
Property may require some investment to provide passive recreation
activities or has potential for future connections or access based on
adjacent property use.
Property requires minimal investment to provide passive recreation
opportunities for the community and promotes preservation of
environmentally sensitive areas. Property has connections to other
recreation areas, trails, or connectivity to existing open space.
Property is marketable for redevelopment OR the site is not suitable for tree
canopy.
n/a Property is designated as a brownfield site or is in foreclosure with EPA liens,
past taxes, and the cost to clean the property or the debt of the property makes
it undesirable for redevelopment or development. However, property is suitable
for tree canopy and/or includes canopy and may be available at a reduced price.
Property is not adjacent to existing core canopy. Location does not provide
support or connectivity to known wildlife corridors or high-value habitat.
Core canopy is defined as tree canopy that exists within and relatively far
from the forest/non-forest boundary (i.e., forested areas surrounded by
more forested areas).
Property includes edge or perforated canopy and is connected/adjacent to core
canopy. Location may augment and/or support connectivity to known wildlife
corridors and/or high value habitat. Edge canopy is defined as the boundary
between core forests and large core forests and large non-forested land cover
features. Perforated canopy defines the boundary between core forests and
relatively small clearings (perforations) within the forest landscape.
Property includes core canopy and augments existing canopy corridors
known to support wildlife habitat, nesting, foraging and migration. Core
canopy is defined as tree canopy that exists within and relatively far from
the forest/non-forest boundary (i.e., forested areas surrounded by more
forested areas).
Canopy would not positively contribute to the equitable distribution of
canopy across the community OR the distribution of canopy is not well
studied or understood in the community.
n/a Canopy would contribute to a more equitable distribution of canopy across
the community.
Parcel is regular shaped and/or large enough to permit building for
development.
n/a Parcel is irregularly shaped or smaller than the required buildable area for
development.
PROPERTY CHARACTERISTIC PROPERTY CHARACTERISTIC PROPERTY CHARACTERISTIC
Texas
137
“Though the word beautification makes the
concept sound merely cosmetic, it involves much
more: clean water, clean air, clean roadsides, safe
waste disposal and preservation of valued old
landmarks as well as great parks and wilderness
areas. To me…beautification means our total
concern for the physical and human quality we
pass on to our children and the future.
LADY BIRD JOHNSON
Urban Forest Master Plan
138
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-035
INFORMAL STAFF REPORT
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Tree Protection during construction.
BACKGROUND:
In January, staff received a request to develop a comprehensive tree protection protocol for
internal and external development/redevelopment projects as it relates to construction. Parks and
Recreation staff coordinated with Engineering to develop criteria that are consistent with the
industry best management practices (BMPs) produced by Texas A&M Forest Service, and rooted
in the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 Part 5: "Trees, Shrubs, and other
Woody Plant Maintenance – Standard Practices (Management of Trees and Shrubs During Site
Development, and Construction)."
DISCUSSION:
The guide provides BMPs for protecting trees to be preserved during the replacement, repair, and
construction of infrastructure in the City of Denton. The intent is to cover the majority of tree
protection scenarios. However, there may be site-specific circumstances that require a custom
solution to working around the tree to be preserved. The guide covers general tree protection but
focuses on protecting trees while constructing/reconstructing or repairing streets, curbs,
sidewalks, and underground utilities. While developing the process, staff took into consideration
the protection of trees on public right-of-ways as well as private property.
CONCLUSION:
The guide will be distributed to internal and external crews that construct/reconstruct public
infrastructure projects for the City of Denton. Once in use, it will reduce construction-related
damage to trees above and below the ground.
STAFF CONTACT:
Haywood Morgan
Urban Forester, Parks and Recreation
Haywood.Morgan@cityofdenton.com
REQUESTOR:
City Council
PARTICIPATING DEPARTMENTS:
Parks and Recreation
Engineering
STAFF TIME TO COMPLETE REPORT:
Parks and Recreation 12 hours
Engineering 3 hours
Total 15 hours
139
City of Denton Tree Protection During Construction
This guide is to provide Best Management Practices (BMPs) for protecting trees to be preserved during the replacement,
repair, & construction of infrastructure in the City of Denton. The following requirements are based on ANSI A300 Part 5:
Trees, Shrubs, and other Woody Plant Maintenance – Standard Practices (Management of Trees and Shrubs During Site
Development, and Construction). The intent is to cover the majority of tree protection scenarios, however there may be
site specific circumstances that require a custom solution to working around the tree to be preserved.
Definitions
Critical Root Zone (CRZ) is the area of soil extending from the tree trunk where roots required for future tree health and
survival are located. This area can also be defined as a circle with a minimum radius of 1’ for every 1” in trunk diameter
at 4.5” above ground.
Tree protection barrier encloses the Tree Protection Zone and is at least 4’ tall, highly visible, sturdy, permanent and has
warning signs on or near it for the duration of any construction activities.
Trunk protection consist of 2-inch thick wooden planks such as 2x4’s installed around the tree with a closed-cell foam
pad secured with straps or wire to hold the planks in place.
Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) is an area where construction activities are prohibited or restricted to prevent injury to
preserved trees, especially during pre-construction and construction, and includes the Critical Root Zone and/or beyond.
For the City of Denton purposes the TPZ will be equal to the CRZ.
4” tall or greater,
Highly visible,
sturdy, and
permanent
Tree Protection
Barrier
Highly Visible
Warning Sign
140
Streets and Curbs
Existing street and curb reconstruction or repair – When reconstructing or repairing existing streets the CRZ of trees
located within the tree lawn are to be protected with a tree protection barrier in all pervious areas of the R.O.W. For
trees behind the sidewalk including private trees that have CRZ that extend into the right of way (R.O.W.). The CRZ is to
be protected with a tree protection barrier in all pervious areas of the R.O.W. Tree protection is not to extend on private
property.
Construction of new streets and sidewalk – When constructing new streets the CRZ of all trees identified to be preserved
are to be protected with a tree protection barrier. In an effort to preserve more trees, encroachment into the CRZ on the
street side of the tree is allowed up to ½ the distance to the trunk. All expose roots are to be pruned back to the soil
level.
Sidewalks and Curbs
Existing sidewalk reconstruction or repair – When reconstructing or repairing existing sidewalks, the trunks of trees
located within the tree lawns are to have trunk protection. Any private tree within 5 feet of the sidewalk is to have a
tree protection barrier parallel to the sidewalk in the R.O.W for the length of the CRZ. Tree protection is not to extend
on private property. Under no circumstance should heavy equipment be driven on the CRZ before or after the sidewalk
has been removed. Do not pile/store anything in the CRZ of the protected trees including but not limited to soil, gravel,
concrete, tool and equipment.
When replacing sidewalk next to existing trees it may be necessary to allow more space for future growth of the tree by:
1) shifting the sidewalk to the furthest extent of the R.O.W. away from the tree, 2) reducing the width of the sidewalk
adjacent to the tree, 3) acquiring additional R.O.W. to shift the sidewalk away from the tree, 4) pruning or ramping over
the offending root before pouring new sidewalk or 5) a combination of the above.
Construction of new sidewalks in existing neighborhood – When constructing new sidewalks, the trunks of trees located
within the tree lawns are to have trunk protection. Any private tree within 5 feet of the side walk is to have a tree
protection barrier parallel to the sidewalk in the R.O.W for the length of the CRZ. Tree protection is not to extend on
private property. Under no circumstance should heavy equipment be driven on the CRZ before or after the sidewalk has
been removed. Do not pile/store anything in the CRZ of the protected trees including but not limited to soil, gravel,
concrete, tool and equipment. The following methods of excavation is the CRZ are acceptable: 1) air spade, 2) hand
digging or hydro-excavator. The air space is preferable. Expose roots less than 2 inches may be pruned back to edge of
the sidewalk forms as needed.
When constructing new sidewalk next to exiting trees it may be necessary to allow more space for future growth of the
tree by: 1) shifting the sidewalk to the furthest extent of the R.O.W. away from the tree, 2) reducing the width of the
side walk adjacent to the tree, 3) acquiring additional R.O.W. to shift the sidewalk away from the tree or 4) pruning or
ramping over the offending root before pouring new sidewalk or 5) a combination of the above.
Curbs
Existing curb reconstruction or repair – When reconstructing or repairing existing curbs, the CRZ of trees located within
the tree lawn are to be protected with a tree protection barrier in all pervious areas of the R.O.W. For trees behind the
sidewalk including private trees that have CRZ that extend into the R.O.W. the CRZ is to be protected in all pervious
areas of the R.O.W. Tree protection is not to extend on private property. Any excavation next to tree is to be done by 1)
Air spade, 2) hand digging or hydro-excavator.
Underground Utilities
Underground utilities installation or repair – When installing underground utilities within the CRZ install by boring, if
excavation is necessary in the CRZ, the following methods are acceptable: 1) air spade, 2) hand digging or hydro-
excavator. The air space is preferable. The trunks of trees located within the tree lawns are to have trunk protection.
Any private tree within 5 feet of the side walk is to have a tree protection barrier parallel to the R.O.W or easement for
the length of the CRZ. Tree protection is not to extend on private property. Under no circumstance should heavy
equipment be driven on the CRZ before or after the sidewalk has been removed. Do not pile/store anything in the CRZ of
the protected trees including but not limited to soil, gravel, concrete, tool and equipment.
141
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-036
INFORMAL STAFF REPORT
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Landmark Tree Designation Criteria
BACKGROUND:
In mid-December, staff received inquiries from Council Member Meltzer and Council Member
Armintor about the process of having local trees classified as “Legacy,” if it is not on the Texas
A&M Forest Service Big Trees Registry. The Parks and Recreation staff coordinated with
Development Services to develop criteria consistent with the Denton Development Code (DDC).
DISCUSSION:
The DDC defines a Landmark tree as, “A healthy tree that is designated by the property owner
on the Texas Big Tree Registry regardless if the tree is protected or a non-protected tree; or a tree
designated as a historic tree where an event of historic significance occurred that had local,
regional, or national importance; or at the home of a citizen who is famous on a local, regional,
or national basis; or that has taken on a legendary stature in the community, is mentioned in
literature or documents of historic value, or is considered unusual due to size, age, or other
landmark status. Historic trees shall be designated following the historic landmark designation
procedure.”
In drafting the attached criteria, Parks and Recreation staff identified three categories of
eligibility, trees that are:
1. On the Texas A&M Forest Service Big Tree Registry,
2. historic, and
3. Legendary in stature
The criteria expands upon and specifies what qualifies a tree as being “legendary in stature in the
community,” and provides a form to nominate individual trees for Landmark tree consideration.
To qualify as “Legendary in Stature,” a tree must meet one of the following:
1. The tree must measure 60 percent of the circumference or tree index score of the State
Champion of the same species as listed on the Texas A&M Forest Service Big Tree
Registry.
2. The tree must be large for its species in a neighborhood or region of the City. The size of
the tree is based on the diameter at breast height (DBH), the height, and the average
crown spread.
3. Any Post Oak over 30” Diameter.
4. Any Blackjack Oak over 20” Diameter.
5. The tree is rare for this area and is a good specimen of the species.
6. The tree is mentioned in literature or documents of historical value.
142
Date: April 10, 2020 Report No. 2020-036
CONCLUSION:
The Landmark Tree criteria were agreed upon by Parks and Recreation and Development
Service staff for implementation without the need for a DDC amendment. Parks and Recreation
will administer the process with a fillable form available on the city website. Development
Services will let permit applicants know of the availability of the program.
STAFF CONTACT:
Haywood Morgan
Urban Forester, Parks and Recreation
Haywood.Morgan@cityofdenton.com
REQUESTOR:
Council Member Meltzer
Council Member Armintor
PARTICIPATING DEPARTMENTS:
Parks and Recreation
Development Services
STAFF TIME TO COMPLETE REPORT:
Parks and Recreation 16 hours
Development Services 1.5 hour
Total 17.5 hours
143
City of Denton Landmark Tree Criteria
General Description
Tree: Woody perennial usually having one dominant trunk and a mature height greater than 5 meters (16 feet).
(Definition by ISA)
Landmark Trees: A healthy tree that is designated by the property owner on the Texas Big Tree Registry
regardless if the tree is protected or a non‐protected tree; or a tree designated as a Historic Tree where an event
of historic significance occurred that had local, regional, or national importance; or at the home of a citizen who is
famous on a local, regional, or national basis; or that has taken on a legendary stature in the community, is
mentioned in literature or documents of historic value, or is considered unusual due to size, age, or other
landmark status. Historic Trees shall be designated following the Historic Landmark Designation procedure.
Eligibility
To be eligible for Landmark Tree designation the tree must meet one of the following:
Texas A&M Forest Service Texas Big Tree Registry
The tree is listed on the Texas A&M Forest Service Texas Big Tree Registry.
Historic
Tree that is designated as a Historic Tree where an event of historic significance occurred that had local,
regional, or national importance.
The tree is located at the home of a citizen who is famous on a local, regional, or national basis.
Legendary in stature
The tree must measure 60 percent of the circumference or tree index score of the State Champion of the
same species as listed on the Texas A&M Forest Service Big Tree Registry.
The tree be must large for its species in a neighborhood or region of the City. The size of the tree is based
on the diameter at breast height (DBH), the height and the average crown spread.
Any Post Oak over 30” Diameter.
Any Blackjack Oak over 20” Diameter.
The tree is rare for this area and is a good specimen of the species.
The tree is mentioned in literature or documents of historic value.
144
Landmark Tree Nomination Form
Species:
Common Name: _______________________________________________________________________
Scientific Name: _______________________________________________________________________
Nominator:
Name ______________________________________ Phone _________________________________________
Address ____________________________________ Email __________________________________________
Owner:
Name ____________________________________ Phone _________________________________________
Address ____________________________________ Email __________________________________________
____________________________________ Signature _______________________________________
Does the owner agree to the tree being designated a Landmark if it meets the criteria? Yes ___ No ___
Does the owner agree to allow City staff or volunteers to inspect the tree? Yes ___ No ___
Tell us a little about the tree and why it should be designated as a Landmark tree. __________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Where is the tree located on the property? (Give the location for someone who is not familiar with the site).
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Email, Mail or Fax completed forms to the
Parks and Recreation Department
901‐B Texas Street
Denton, TX 76209
parknrec@cityofdenton.com
If you have any question call (940) 349‐8337
145
Policy and Worksession RequestsCompletedCouncil Member Requestor DateSummary of RequestStaff AssignedDepartmentComments1Council Member Meltzer01/13/20Will staff prepare a report detailing the total amounts of PM 10 and PM2.5 emissions currently allowed by permit to entities in the City?BanksRequest will be presented during an upcoming PendingRequest work session2Council Member Briggs02/03/20Would like to request council discuss a citywide public health study.http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Health/Info_to_Post/HealthReport-linked.pdf Like thisMendozaCity Manager's OfficeRequest will be presented during a future PendingRequest work session3Council Member Armintor02/09/20(1) Can staff explore the possibility of a temporary restriction on parkingon the mailbox side of Lattimore until sidewalks can be constructed onthat side of the street? Even with the USPS door delivery option forseniors and people with disabilities, until sidewalks can be constructedthe best option for general neighborhood accessibility for residents withdisabilities and senior residents might be restricting parking on one side(indicated with paint). (2) Can someone please let me know which otherresidential Denton streets besides Lattimore are lacking both sidewalksand USPS door service (i.e. lacking both at the same time, not just oneor the other)?EstesCapital ProjectsRequest will be presented during an upcoming PendingRequest work session4Council Member Briggs02/22/20Will staff look into crosswalk concern at Montecito near White Dove?EstesCapital ProjectsInformation will be provided in future Friday Report5Council Member Briggs03/02/20How many developments do we have left that fall under our old treecodeMcDonaldDevelopment ServicesRequest will be presented during a future PendingRequest work session6Council Member Briggs03/03/20Can staff follow up on the stop sign request on Ryan Road at theentrance to the Good Samaritan Village?JahnCapital ProjectsInformation will be provided in future Friday Report7Council Member Armintor03/03/20Would like a work session on passing an "Engine Braking Prohibited"ordinance in Denton.KuechlerCity Manager's OfficeOn hold at Council Member's Request - Request will bepresented during a future Pending Request work session8Mayor Pro Tem Hudspeth03/06/20Can staff look at the school zone area on Glenwood Lane near Windsor?JahnCapital ProjectsInformation will be provided in future Friday Report9Council Member Briggs03/26/20Does staff need to do anything to follow up on citizen request to TxDOTregarding I-35E service road at US 77?DeshmukhCapital ProjectsInformation will be provided in future Friday Report10Council Member Briggs03/26/20The new turn from northbound Mayhill to Mills Road is too tight for busesso they cannot use that route to access the bus lot. They have to goaround a different way. Can staff look into addressing this?EstesCapital ProjectsInformation will be provided in future Friday Report11Council Member Davis03/27/20Construction Vehicles on Malone/Ector. Can staff please look intoreports that our road construction contractors' vehicles are speedingdown Ector St. Potentially Malone St. as well? Thanks!EstesCapital ProjectsInformation will be provided in future Friday Report12Council Member Briggs03/27/20Can staff give background on the zoning of the Green Belt BusinessPark on US 380?CannoneDevelopment ServicesInformation will be provided in future Friday Report13Council Member Armintor04/07/20Does staff have an update regarding the Westglen flooding issue?EstesCapital ProjectsInformation will be provided in future Friday Report14Council Member Briggs04/07/20Can staff coordinate a response to a resident regarding the NAAextensions?Leal/McDonaldLegal/Development Services Information will be provided in future Friday Report15Council Member Briggs04/06/20What is the new process when you get a ticket? With courts closed, arethere fines and penalties, warrants, etc?PuenteMunicipal CourtInformation will be provided in the April 10 Friday Report16Council Member Meltzer04/06/20Can staff clarify and reach out to a resident regarding identificationrequirements when changing out his solid waste carts?FosterCustomer ServiceInformation will be provided in the April 10 Friday Report17Council Member Briggs04/06/20Is staff able/interested in attending a webinar from the Department ofEnergy?BarnettSustainabilityInformation will be provided in the April 10 Friday Report18Council Member Armintor04/08/20Can we please have a work session on the Credit and Collectionspolicy? This would include a proactive moratorium on the requirement tocreate a new account with a new deposit every time you move.19Council Member Armintor04/08/20Requesting a Council resolution to the Secretary of State in support ofno-excuse universal mail-in ballots for all elections to ensure ourconstituents maximum voting access during the COVID-19 crisis and atall times.Balthrop-MendozaCMORequest will be presented during a future PendingRequest work sessionPage 1 of 1Exported on April 10, 2020 5:44:59 PM CDT146
April 2020 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 Cancelled -2:30pm Agenda Committee 2 Cancelled - 8:30 DEDC Cancelled - 4:00 Public Art Committee 345 6 CANCELLED -11:30 am Council Luncheon CANCELLED -COE 1:30 CANCELLED -Traffic Safety Commission 5:30 pm 7 Council Meeting 3:30pm Closed 4:30pm Work Session 6:30 Regular CANCELLED-Audit/Finance 10:30 CANCELLED- COCE 10:30 8 CANCELLED -11:00 EDPB CANCELLED -2:30pm Agenda Committee 6:30pm P&Z Regular Session 9 Cancelled HOT & S 1:00 101112 13 Cancelled-PUB 9am Cancelled-HLC 5:30pm Cancelled--Library Board 5:30pm 14 Cancelled-2:00 pm 2nd Tuesday Session Cancelled-Mobility Committee Meeting 9:00 am 15 Cancelled-2:30pm Agenda Committee 16 Cancelled-6:00pm Committee on Persons with Disabilities Cancelled‐HABSCO 4pm 171819 20 21 2:00 pm CC Work Session 6:30 pm CC Regular Session 22 2:30pm Agenda Committee 5:00pm P&Z Work Session 6:30pm P&Z Regular Session 23 242526 27 PUB 9am ZBA 5:30pm 28 10am Council Airport Committee 2:00 pm 4th Tuesday Session 29 2:30pm Agenda Committee 30 CANCELLED - 5:30PM Board of Ethics 147
May 2020 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 123 4 PUB 9am 11:30 am Council Luncheon COE 1:30 Traffic Safety Commission 5:30 pm 5 2:00 pm CC Work Session 6:30 pm CC Regular Session 6 2:30pm Agenda Committee 5:00pm P&Z Work Session 6:30pm P&Z Regular Session 7 8:30 DEDC 4:00 Public Art Committee 8910 11 12 4:00 pm CC Election Reception / Meeting Mobility Committee Meeting 9:00 am 13 11:00 EDPB 5:30 Airport Advisory Board 14 HOT Committee 1pm 151617 18 PUB 9am ZBA 5:30pm 19 2:00 pm CC Work Session 6:30 pm CC Regular Session 20 2:30pm Agenda Committee 5:00pm P&Z Work Session 6:30pm P&Z Regular Session 21 6:00pm Committee on Persons with Disabilities HABSCO 4pm 222324 25 Memorial Day Holiday 26 10am Council Airport Committee No Council Meeting 27 12:00 TIF Board (TIRZ) 2:30pm Agenda Committee 28 5:30PM Board of Ethics 293031 148
June 2020 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 11:30 am Council Luncheon COE 1:30 Traffic Safety Commission 5:30 pm 2 2:00 pm CC Work Session 6:30 pm CC Regular Session 3 2:30pm Agenda Committee 5:00pm P&Z Work Session 6:30pm P&Z Regular Session 4 8:30 DEDC 4:00 Public Art Committee 567 8 PUB 9am 9 2:00 pm 2nd Tuesday Session Mobility Committee Meeting 9:00 am 10 11:00 EDPB 2:30pm Agenda Committee 5:30 Airport Advisory Board 11 121314 15 16 2:00 pm CC Work Session 6:30 pm CC Regular Session 17 5:00pm P&Z Work Session 6:30pm P&Z Regular Session 18 HOT & S 9:00 6:00pm Committee on Persons with Disabilities HABSCO 4pm 192021 22 PUB 9am 23 10am Council Airport Committee 2:00 pm 4th Tuesday Session 2425 HOT & S 9:00 5:30PM Board of Ethics 262728 29 ZBA 5:30pm 30 No Council Meeting 149
City Council
City of Denton
Meeting Agenda
City Hall
215 E. McKinney St.
Denton, Texas 76201
www.cityofdenton.com
Work Session Room12:00 PMTuesday, April 21, 2020
WORK SESSION BEGINS AT 12:00 P.M. IN THE WORK SESSION ROOM
REGULAR MEETING BEGINS AT 6:30 P.M. IN THE WORK SESSION ROOM
Note: Mayor Chris Watts, Mayor Pro Tem Gerard Hudspeth, and Council Members Keely Briggs, Jesse
Davis, John Ryan, Deb Armintor and Paul Meltzer will be participating in the closed meeting, work session,
and regular meeting via video/teleconference.
REGISTRATION GUIDELINES FOR ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
Due to COVID-19 precautions, members of the public will not be able to attend the Tuesday, April 21,
City Council meeting in-person. To accommodate and receive input on agenda items, citizens will be able
to participate in one of the following ways (NOTE: Except for public hearings, citizens may only comment
once per agenda item and cannot use both methods to comment on a single item.):
• Virtual “White Card” – On Friday, April 17, the agenda was posted online at
www.cityofdenton.com/publicmeetings. Once the agenda is posted, a link to the Virtual White Card, an
online form, will be made available under the main heading on the webpage. Within this form, citizens may
indicate support or opposition, and submit a brief comment about a specific agenda item. Similar to when a
citizen submits a physical white card to indicate their position on the item, these comment forms will be sent
directly to City Council members and recorded by the City Secretary. The Mayor will announce the
number of Comment Cards submitted in support or opposition to an item during the public comment
period. Comments may be submitted up until the start of the meeting, which begins at 6:30 p.m. Online
comments received after 6:30 p.m. will not be delivered to the City Council nor entered into the public
record.
OR
• BY PHONE – Citizens wishing to speak to the Council on an agenda item over the phone, may call
(940) 349-7800 up to 30 minutes prior to the meeting, which begins at 6:30 p.m. When the call is initially
received, a staff member will receive the caller’s information and either: 1) offer to call the citizen back
when it is time for them to speak on their requested item, or 2) record the caller’s information, support or
opposition, and comment. If the caller chooses to record their support or opposition, rather than speaking
during the meeting, the Mayor will announce the number of comments submitted in support or opposition
to the item. If the caller wishes to receive a call back, the voice of each caller will be broadcast into the
meeting during the public commenting time of their desired agenda item. Individuals will be able to
comment once per agenda item, no matter the method.
• At regular meetings only, citizens can speak on any topic that is not on the agenda (Open Microphone).
Alert the call taker if you wish to speak under the Open Microphone category.
Page 1 Printed on 4/10/2020
150
April 21, 2020City Council Meeting Agenda
After determining that a quorum is present, the City Council of the City of Denton, Texas will convene in a
Work Session on Tuesday, April 21, 2020, at 12:00 p.m. in the Council Work Session Room at City Hall,
215 E. McKinney Street, Denton, Texas at which the following items will be considered:
WORK SESSION
1. Citizen Comments on Consent Agenda Items
This section of the agenda allows citizens to speak on any item listed on the Consent Agenda prior to its
consideration. Each speaker will be given a total of three (3) minutes to address any item(s). Any person
who wishes to address the City Council regarding these items may do so by submitting a Virtual White Card
or by telephonic participation as referenced under the REGISTRATION GUIDELINES FOR
ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL found on the first page of this agenda.
2. Requests for clarification of agenda items listed on this agenda.
3. Work Session Reports
Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding an update to the
City of Denton’s COVID-19 response.
ID 20-771A.
Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding the Budget
Reduction Strategy.
ID 20-830B.
Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction regarding boards,
commissions and Council committees meeting schedules.
ID 20-831C.
Receive reports, hold discussions, and give staff direction on the following with respect to
Green Tree Estates.
ID 20-832D.
Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction for creating a policy for
requests to create Municipal Utility Districts (MUDs) within the City and the
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ).
DCA20-0001E.
Receive a report, hold a discussion, and give staff direction on pending City Council
requests for information.
ID 20-176F.
Following the completion of the Work Session, the City Council will convene in a Closed Meeting to consider
specific items when these items are listed below under the Closed Meeting section of this agenda. The City
Council reserves the right to adjourn into a Closed Meeting on any item on its Open Meeting agenda consistent
with Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, or as otherwise allowed by law.
1. Closed Meeting:
TBD PLACEHOLDER - For any potential closed meeting item
Page 2 Printed on 4/10/2020
151
April 21, 2020City Council Meeting Agenda
Any final action, decision, or vote on a matter deliberated in a Closed Meeting will only be taken in an Open
Meeting that is held in compliance with Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, except to the extent such final
decision, or vote is taken in the Closed Meeting in accordance with the provisions of Section 551.086 of the
Texas Government Code (the ‘Public Power Exception’). The City Council reserves the right to adjourn into a
Closed Meeting or Executive Session as authorized by Texas Government Code, Section 551.001, et seq.
(The Texas Open Meetings Act) on any item on its open meeting agenda or to reconvene in a continuation of
the Closed Meeting on the Closed Meeting items noted above, in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings
Act, including, without limitation Sections 551.071-551.086 of the Texas Open Meetings Act.
NOTE: Any item for which a formal action at the Regular Meeting has been taken by Council may
be subject to a request for a motion for reconsideration at any time during the meeting, at the
Concluding Items Section, or after the meeting. In order to comply with the Texas Open Meetings
Act, a request for a motion for reconsideration made during, at the end of, or after a Council meeting
will be placed on the agenda and considered at the next official meeting of the City Council.
_________________________________________________________________________________
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF DENTON CITY COUNCIL AT 6:30 P.M. IN THE
COUNCIL WORK SESSION ROOM AT CITY HALL, 215 E. MCKINNEY STREET, DENTON,
TEXAS AT WHICH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE CONSIDERED:
1. PRESENTATION FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
A. Review of procedures for addressing the City Council.
B. Reports from members of the public shall be received through the following two (2) methods. A total
of up to seven (7) speakers are permitted to provide public comment and may include any combination of
prior registration and open microphone speakers.
1) Pre-registration. This section of the agenda permits any person who has registered in advance to
make a citizen report regarding a public business item he or she wishes to be considered by the City
Council. Each speaker is allowed a maximum of four (4) minutes to present their report. At the conclusion
of each report, the City Council may pose questions to the speaker or may engage in discussion. If the
City Council believes that a speaker's report requires a more detailed review, the City Council will give the
City Manager or City Staff direction to place the item on a future work session or regular meeting agenda
and advise staff as to the background materials to be desired at such meeting.
2) Open Microphone. This section of the agenda permits any person who has not registered in
advance for a citizen report to make comments about public business items not listed on the agenda. Such
person(s) shall have registered via email or telephone as specified by the City on its website or meeting
notice.
During open microphone reports under this section of the agenda, the Council may listen to citizens speak.
However, because notice of the subject of the open microphone report has not been provided to the public
in advance, the Texas Open Meetings Act limits any deliberation or decision by the Council to: a proposal
to place the item on a future agenda; a statement of factual policy; or a recitation of existing policy. Council
Members may not ask the open microphone speakers questions or discuss the items presented during
open microphone reports.
NOTE: If audio/visual aids during presentations to Council are needed, they must be submitted to the City
Secretary 24 hours prior to the meeting.
2. CONSENT AGENDA
Page 3 Printed on 4/10/2020
152
April 21, 2020City Council Meeting Agenda
Each of these items is recommended by Staff and approval thereof will be strictly on the basis of the Staff
recommendations. Approval of the Consent Agenda authorizes the City Manager or his designee to
implement each item in accordance with the Staff recommendations. The City Council has received
background information and has had an opportunity to raise questions regarding these items prior to
consideration.
Listed below are bids, purchase orders, contracts, and other items to be approved under the Consent
Agenda (Agenda Items A – N). This listing is provided on the Consent Agenda to allow Council Members
to discuss or withdraw an item prior to approval of the Consent Agenda. If no items are pulled, the Consent
Agenda Items will be approved with one motion. If items are pulled for separate discussion, they may be
considered as the first items following approval of the Consent Agenda.
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation, authorizing the City Secretary or her designee to file a Catastrophe Notice
with the Office of the Texas Attorney General, pursuant to Section 552.233(b) of the
Government Code, to suspend the applicability of the requirements of the Public
Information Act (the “PIA”) in accordance with Sections 552.233(c) and 552.233(e) of
the Government Code; and providing an effective date.
ID 20-809A.
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton authorizing the City Manager, or
his designee, to execute a Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Easement No.
DACW63-2-01-0673, between the City and the United States Army Corps of
Engineers, related to the raw water pump station at Lake Ray Roberts, located in the
Martha Langston Survey, Abstract No. 739, part of the United States of America, Tract
210 - Lake Ray Roberts, County of Denton, Texas; and providing for severability and an
effective date.
ID 20-816B.
Consider approval of a resolution approving use of unspent proceeds of Revenue Bonds
issued by New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation on behalf of the
CHF - Collegiate Housing Denton, L.L.C. in an amount not to exceed $2,700,000 for the
costs relating to parking facilities at Texas Women’s University; recognizing that the City
of Denton is not responsible for issuing the Revenue Bonds and has no financial obligation
to pay any principal of or interest on the Revenue Bonds; making certain findings in
connection therewith; and providing an effective date.
ID 20-818C.
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, Texas to declare the intent to
reimburse capital program expenditures of the General Government ($3,423,000) with
Certificates of Obligation with an aggregate maximum principal amount not to exceed
$3,423,000; and providing an effective date.
ID 20-819D.
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation, authorizing the approval of a fifth amendment to a Professional Services
Agreement between the City of Denton and Teague Nall and Perkins, Inc., amending the
contract approved by the City Manager on April 10, 2017, in the not-to-exceed amount
of $93,500; amended by amendments 1 - 4 approved by City Council, City Manager and
Purchasing Staff; said fifth amendment to provide engineering and design services relating
to the hickory creek road west project; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor;
and providing an effective date (File 6427 - providing for an additional fifth amendment
ID 20-822E.
Page 4 Printed on 4/10/2020
153
April 21, 2020City Council Meeting Agenda
expenditure amount not-to-exceed $67,635, with the total contract amount no-to-exceed
$293,185).
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation, rejecting any and all competitive bids under RFP 6945 for Land
Management Software for the City of Denton Development Service Department; and
providing an effective date (RFP 6945).
ID 20-823F.
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation, authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Milsoft Utility
Solutions, Inc., for continued vendor support of the Milsoft Interactive Voice Response
and associated software modules along with new hardware and software upgrades, which
is the sole provider of this software, in accordance with Texas Local Government Code
252.022, which provides that procurement of commodities and services that are available
from one source are exempt from competitive bidding, and if over $50,000 shall be
awarded by the governing body; and providing an effective date (File 7209 - awarded to
Milsoft Utility Solutions, Inc., in the five (5) year not-to-exceed amount of $410,588).
ID 20-824G.
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation, authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Trilliant Networks,
Inc., for continued vendor support services for Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI)
for Denton Municipal Electric Metering Department, in accordance with Texas Local
Government Code 252.022, which provides that procurement of commodities and
services that are available from one source are exempt from competitive bidding, and if
over $50,000 shall be awarded by the governing body; and providing an effective date
(File 7218 - awarded to Trilliant Networks, Inc., in the five (5) year not-to-exceed
amount of $817,304.50).
ID 20-825H.
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation, authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with CRC Lawncare and
Landscape LLC, for Park locations, Cemeteries, Libraries, Public Buildings, Medians,
Fire Stations, Water Reclamation, Beneficial Reuse, and Airport mowing services and
maintenance, Sections A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, and K; providing for the expenditure of
funds therefor; and providing an effective date (RFP 7254 - awarded to CRC Lawncare
and Landscape LLC, for one (1) year, with the option for one (1) additional extensions, in
the total two (2) year not-to-exceed amount of $600,000).
ID 20-826I.
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation, authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Custom
Landscaping Inc. dba Classic Landscapes Maintenance, Inc., for Section I - DME
Offices/Substation locations mowing services and maintenance; providing for the
expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (RFP 7254 - awarded to
Custom Landscaping Inc. dba Classic Landscapes Maintenance, Inc., for one (1) year,
with the option for one (1) additional extensions, in the total two (2) year not-to-exceed
amount of $160,000).
ID 20-827J.
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation, authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Progressive Services
ID 20-829K.
Page 5 Printed on 4/10/2020
154
April 21, 2020City Council Meeting Agenda
Inc. dba Progressive Roofing, through The Interlocal Purchasing System (TIPS)
Cooperative Program Contract # RCSP 190201 for the roof replacement of the
Municipal Lab Building; providing for the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an
effective date (File 7266 - awarded to Progressive Services Inc. dba Progressive
Roofing, in the amount of $172,260).
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation, authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Interfaith Ministries
of Denton, Inc., for a utility assistance program for low-income households; providing for
the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective date (RFP 7244 - awarded
to Interfaith Ministries of Denton, Inc., for one (1) year, with the option for four (4)
additional one (1) year extensions, in the total five (5) year not-to-exceed amount of
$625,000).
ID 20-835L.
Consider adoption of an ordinance authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to
execute a development agreement between the City of Denton and Shercross
Development, LLC for the installment of critical infrastructure related to Hercules Drive;
authorizing the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing for an effective date.
ID 20-838M.
Consider approval of the minutes of March 17, March 20, March 31, and April 6, 2020.ID 20-849N.
3. ITEM(S) FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton authorizing the City Manager, or
his designee, to execute an amendment to an Advance Funding Agreement with the Texas
Department of Transportation for an expansion of Mayhill Road from a two-lane rural
roadway to a four-lane divided urban arterial roadway from IH 35 East to US 380 in the
City of Denton; authorizing the expenditure of funds therefor; and providing an effective
date.
ID 20-617A.
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Denton approving
the execution of an insurance binder by the City Manager for forced outage insurance of
the Denton Energy Center for the summer of 2020, and providing an effective date, in an
amount not to exceed $975,000. The policy will be awarded to the qualified bidder that
provides the lowest price on the date the insurance binder is executed.
ID 20-744B.
Consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton, a Texas home-rule municipal
corporation (“City”), authorizing the execution of a Contract of Sale, and Amendment,
between the City, as Buyer, and Saratan Corporation I, a Texas Corporation (“Saratan”),
as Seller, for the purchase of 909 N. Loop 288, Denton, Denton County, Texas
(“Property”), for the purchase price of $5,200,000.00; authorizing the expenditure of
funds therefor including the cash amount of $3,395,000.00 towards the purchase price;
accepting the donation value of the property from seller of $1,805,000.00; providing for
severability; and providing an effective date.
ID 20-837C.
4. PUBLIC HEARING(S)
Hold a public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance of the City of Denton,
Texas, approving a change in the zoning district and use classification from the Residential
Z20-0001bA.
Page 6 Printed on 4/10/2020
155
April 21, 2020City Council Meeting Agenda
2 (R2) zoning district and use classification to the Mixed-Use Neighborhood (MN) zoning
district and use classification; on approximately 3.46 acres of land located on the
northeast side of I-35, approximately 196-feet northwest of Thunderbird Drive, in the
City of Denton, Denton County, Texas; adopting an amendment to the city’s official
zoning map; providing for a penalty in the maximum amount of $2,000.00 for violations
thereof; providing for severability; and establishing an effective date. The Planning and
Zoning Commission recommends approval with conditions (5-0) (Z20-0001, I-35
Offices, Cindy Jackson)
5. CONCLUDING ITEMS
A. Under Section 551.042 of the Texas Open Meetings Act, respond to inquiries from the City Council
or the public with specific factual information or recitation of policy, or accept a proposal to place the
matter on the agenda for an upcoming meeting AND Under Section 551.0415 of the Texas Open
Meetings Act, provide reports about items of community interest regarding which no action will be taken,
to include: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or condolence; information regarding holiday schedules;
an honorary or salutary recognition of a public official, public employee, or other citizen; a reminder about
an upcoming event organized or sponsored by the governing body; information regarding a social,
ceremonial, or community event organized or sponsored by an entity other than the governing body that
was attended or is scheduled to be attended by a member of the governing body or an official or employee
of the municipality; or an announcement involving an imminent threat to the public health and safety of
people in the municipality that has arisen after the posting of the agenda.
B. Possible Continuation of Closed Meeting topics, above posted.
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of
Denton, Texas, on the 17th day of April, 2020 at ___________________
__________________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
NOTE: THE CITY OF DENTON'S DESIGNATED PUBLIC MEETING FACILITIES ARE
ACCESSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. THE CITY
WILL PROVIDE ACCOMMODATION, SUCH AS SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS FOR THE
HEARING IMPAIRED, IF REQUESTED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE
SCHEDULED MEETING. PLEASE CALL THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 940-349-8309 OR
USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF (TDD) BY CALLING 1-800-RELAY-TX
SO THAT REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION CAN BE ARRANGED.
Page 7 Printed on 4/10/2020
156
Meeting Date
21-Apr
COVID-19 Update
20-771
Green Tree Estates
20-832
Denton MUDDs
DCA20-0001
Budget Reduction
Strategy
20-830
Boards, Commissions &
Committees Meeting
Schedules
20-831
Review of Council
Requests Apr 21
20-176
28-Apr 19-2914
4-May Lunch
@ 11:30 a.m.CIP Update
5-May
EV Charger Upgrade
20-732
Internal Audit/Capital
Proj. Admin. - Planning &
Design
20-729
Internal Audit/Capital
Proj. Admin. - Property
Acquisition
20-730
2019-20 Audit Plan
20-731
SB. 2 Budget
Implications
20-582
2020 Mobility Plan
Update7
20-245
Review of Council
Requests May 05
20-458
12-May
Review of Council
Requests May 19
20-459
19-May
Drop-off Recycling
Center
20-768 DTB Public Meetings
FY 19-20 Budget, CIP, &
5-Year Forecasst
20-806
Denton Development
Code Amendments
Ethics Ordinance
Changes
TBD
Review of Council
Requests May 19
20-460
26-May 19-2914
June 1 Lunch
@ 11:30 a.m.
2-Jun
Review of Council
Requests June 02
20-671
9-Jun
Review of Council
Requests June 09
20-672
16-Jun
Review of Council
Requests June 16
20-673
23-Jun
Review of Council
Requests June 23
20-674
30-Jun 19-2914
Accessory Dwelling
Units, and Screening
DCA19-0011 Delegated Authority
Doorbell Monitoring
Technology
19-2959 Stormwater Master Plan
Construction Code
Review (TBD)
NOTE: No Meetings July
6, 7, and 14
Group Home Code
Amendment Public Art
Purchasing Manual
Update
Right of Way Ordinance
Follow-up
Review of Council
Requests July 21
20-847
Municipal Broadband
20-556
Denton Development
Code Amendments
(Cont'd)
Urban Forest Master
Plan
20-426
Sustainability Plan
20-521 Plugged Gas Wells
Review of Council
Requests July 28
20-848
Library Master Plan
20-526
TIF Grants for
Accessibility
Work Session
Requests Determined
by Council -
Date TBD
Community Public Art
and Community Tree
Grants
Ethics Ordinance
Revision
Small Cell Lawsuit
Participation Tree Ordinance Review
Veteran Source of
Income Housing
Discrimination
Ordinance
CANCELLED
No meeting; 5th Tuesday
Work Sessions Planned - Date TBDFUTURE WORK SESSION ITEMS MATRIX
As of April 10, 2020
Currently Slated Work Session Items
No meeting; Day after Memoral Day Holiday
157
Street/Intersection From To Closure
Start Date
Closure
End Date Description Department Upcoming
Info/Notes
Public
Meeting
Other
Communication
Department
Contact
941 Precision Airport Rd W. Oak St.04/20/20 05/29/20
Concrete Street Repair. The
process starts with Barricading
the failed sections of pavement,
remove the pavement and
subgrade, and install new
concrete pavement.
Streets N/A (940) 349-7146
I35E northbound service
road located
500 ft west
of Bonnie
Brae
TBD TBD Wastewater Improvements
(Temporary Lane Closures)Wastewater (940) 349-8909
Pembrooke Chasewood Long Ridge 04/20/20 05/22/20
Curb and Gutter Repair. The
process starts with Barricading
the failed sections of, Curb and
Gutter remove and install
Curbs.
Also Mill and Overlay section of
Street that was impacted with
the curb repair.
Streets N/A (940) 349-7146
Robson East Side of
RR 35W TBD TBD Wastewater Main Install
(Temporary Lane Closure)Wastewater (940) 349-8909
Rockwood Ln.Royal Mistywood TBD TBD bundle Engineering this will be part of bundle Door Hangers
Roselawn Dr.Bonnie Brae Kansas City
Southern RR TBD TBD
Drainage and Roadway
Construction
Bonnie Brae Phase 1
(One Lane traffic control)
Engineering Part of Bonnie Brae Ph. I
Capital Project (940) 349-8910
Royal Ln.Royal Rockwood TBD TBD bundle Engineering this will be part of bundle
Thomas St.Panhandle Oak TBD TBD Streets Construction Capital Projects Part of 2019 Street
Bundle (940) 349-7104
Total 6
Street Closure Report
Upcoming Closures
Week of April 13, 2020 - April 19, 2020
Upcoming Closures
158
Street/Intersection From To Closure
Start Date
Closure
End Date Description Department Upcoming
Info/Notes
Public
Meeting
Other
Communication
Department
Contact
Bent Creek Kappwood Spring
Creek 01/06/20 04/24/20
Concrete Street panel and
Sidewalk repair. The process
starts with barricading the failed
sections of concrete pavement,
remove the pavement and
subgrade, and install new
concrete pavement.
Streets N/A (940) 349-7146
Broken Arrow Dunes Old
Orchard 03/09/20 03/17/20
Concrete Sidewalk Repair.
The process starts with
Barricading the failed
sections of concrete
sidewalk, remove , and install
new concrete.
Streets Project on hold due to
COVID-19 N/A (940) 349-7146
Brown Dr Roberts St Woodland
St 02/10/20 03/17/20
Wastewater collections will be
installing a new wastewater
main line and services
Wastewater Project on hold due to
COVID-19 N/A (940) 349-8909
Cherrywood Ln Woodland
St
Northwood
Tr 02/10/20 03/17/20
Wastewater collections will be
installing a new wastewater
main line and services
Wastewater Project on hold due to
COVID-19 N/A (940) 349-8909
Colorado Blvd Brinker Rd
3201
Colorado
Blvd
02/17/20 04/13/20
Private Development: Drainage,
Water, Sanitary Sewer, and
Pavement for Fire Station #8
Public Works
Inspections,
Private
Development
NextDoor, Direct
business contact (940) 205-9230
Dunes St Broken
Arrow
Old
Orchard 03/02/20 03/17/20
Concrete Curb and Sidewalk
Repair. The process starts
with Barricading the failed
sections of concrete and,
remove , and install new
concrete.
Streets Project on hold due to
COVID-19 N/A (940) 349-7146
Eagle Elm Locust 03/30/20 05/08/20 PEC 4 1&2 Drainage and
Utility Improvements Engineering NextDoor, N/A (940) 349-8938
Street Closure Report
Week of April 13, 2020 - April 19, 2020
Current Closures
Current Closures
159
Street/Intersection From To Closure
Start Date
Closure
End Date Description Department Upcoming
Info/Notes
Public
Meeting
Other
Communication
Department
Contact
Elm St.Oak Parkway 09/23/19 04/18/20 Sidewalk Improvements Engineering
3/26/20 - Contractor
delayed for 2 weeks.
Part of Downtown TIF
Sidewalk & Lighting CIP -
Temporary lane and
shoulder closures due to
sidewalk reconstruction.
Schedule delayed due to
significant weather
impacts and traffic signal
relocations at McKinney.
(940) 349-8425
FM 2181
City of
Denton/Cori
nth City
limits
Lillian Miller 11/18/19 TBD Street Widening TxDOT
Watch TXDOT message
boards for local street
closure updates.
(940) 349-8425
FM 2499 Pine Hills Hickory
Creek Rd 03/27/20 05/01/20
Ana Site Construction:
Water and Sewer Bore FM2499
Public Works
Inspections,
Private
Development
NextDoor (940) 205-9230
Foxcroft Emerson Emerson 01/30/20 03/17/20
Wastewater main
replacement.
Projects extents, Emerson
from Emerson Circle to
Foxcroft.
Emerson Circle from Emerson
to End
Foxcroft from Emerson to
Northcrest
Foxcroft from Old North to
Emerson
Wastewater Project on hold due to
COVID-19 N/A (940) 349-8909
Foxcroft Cir Emerson Ln Emerson Ln 03/09/20 03/17/20
Water Distribution will be
replacing the water main and
water services.
Water Project on hold due to
COVID-19 N/A (940) 349-7278
Ft. Worth Dr. (US 377)IH 35E Mission St 10/17/19 11/27/20 Infrastructure Safety Upgrades
(temporary closures)TxDOT (940) 349-8938
Ft. Worth Dr. (US 377)IH 35E
0.26 mi
south of FM
1830
12/03/18 12/12/20
Street Widening
(Temporary Lane Closures
during non-peak traffic)
TxDOT 10/08/19 (940) 387-1414
Hidden Meadows Trail
Intersection
with Vintage
Blvd
back of
Vintage blvd
right of way
03/16/20 05/01/20
Intermittent closures of this
intersection for construction
activities
Engineering NextDoor, Email
Notification (940) 349-8938
Hobson Country
Club Forest Ridge 04/06/20 04/20/20
Paving connection at FM1830
as part of the TxDOT 377
project.
Engineering,
TxDOT
NextDoor, Message
Boards (940) 349-8938
Hollyhill Ln Longridge
Dr
Tennyson
Trl 03/06/20 03/17/20
Water Distribution will be
replacing the water main and
water services.
Water Project on hold due to
COVID-19 N/A (940) 349-7278
Current Closures
160
Street/Intersection From To Closure
Start Date
Closure
End Date Description Department Upcoming
Info/Notes
Public
Meeting
Other
Communication
Department
Contact
Jim Christal Westen Blvd
Army
Reserve
Center 3250
Jim Christal
Rd
04/17/20 04/20/20 Warranty repair -Road repair
around a Sewer Man Hole.
Waste Water,
Private
Development
Direct business contact,
contractor will have
direct contact with
affected parties. April 10
2020
(940) 783-6800
John Paine Road
Southwest
Pump
Station
John Paine
Road at
John Paine
Road near
IH 35W
01/06/20 05/31/20
Construction is continuing thru
COVID-19. Please respect
workers efforts in the field and
always maintain social
distancing.
4/8/20 John Pain Closure to be
set up this week due to
construction phasing progress.
4/1/20 John Paine closure to set
up on 04/13/2020 thru 4/17/20.
3/25/20 John Paine closure to
set up on 04/13/2020. Notices
will be released the week before
closure. John Paine Road will
be closed as needed. Project
includes installation of water
main along Old John Paine and
Allred Road between the
Southwest Pump Station on
John Paine Road near
Parkplace Dr. on and South
Bonnie Brae St.
Water NextDoor (940) 349-8925
Johnson Lane John Paine
Road
Just west of
first
driveway
01/06/20 05/31/20
3/25/20 Construction is
continuing thru COVID-19.
Please respect workers efforts
in the field and always maintain
social distancing.
Road closure is for the
installation of new water main
along Old John Paine Rd. and
Allred Rd. between the
Southwest Pump Station on
John Paine Rd. near Parkplace
Dr. and South Bonnie Brae St.
Water NextDoor (940) 349-8925
Johnson Street; Smith Street Dallas Drive
Daughtery
Street, at S
Locust
Street
04/06/20 07/31/20
Atmos Energy is relocating/
replacing existing gas mains
and services for upcoming
reconstruction of Smith Street;
including gas main crossing
Johnson Street at Smith Street.
Atmos
Direct business contact,
Atmos Energy to
distribute door hangers,
place sign boards, and
notify residents in
person
(940) 268-7285
Kerley Street Duncan
Street
Shady Oaks
Drive 02/05/20 03/17/20 Street Reconstruction Streets
Project on hold
temporarily due to
COVID-19 response
(940) 349-7146
Current Closures
161
Street/Intersection From To Closure
Start Date
Closure
End Date Description Department Upcoming
Info/Notes
Public
Meeting
Other
Communication
Department
Contact
Locust St.Warren Ct.Sycamore
St.03/09/20 04/24/20
Storm drain improvements as
part of Pec-4 Ph 1&2
Project. West side lane
closure.
Engineering Direct business contact (940) 349-8938
Locust St.Highland St Eagle Dr 03/09/20 04/27/20
Sewer main improvements, as
part of Pec-4 Ph 1&2
Project. West side lane closure.
Engineering Direct business contact (940) 349-8938
Locust St.Oak McKinney 04/13/20 05/15/20 Sidewalk Improvements Engineering
3/26/20 - Contractor
Delayed for 2 weeks.
Part of Downtown TIF
Sidewalk & Lighting CIP.
Schedule delayed due to
weather
(940) 349-8910
Loop 288 Colorado
225 west of
Colorado
blvd
03/16/20 05/15/20
This project is to install a drive
approach at the Golden Triangle
Mall as part of the Colorado
Blvd and Loop 288 intersection
improvements.
Engineering,
Floyd Smith
Concrete
Floyd Smith concrete will
resume work on this
project April 6th 2020.
Direct business contact (940) 349-7104
Masch Branch U S 380 Jim Crystal 02/17/20 03/17/20
We will be reconstructing
Masch Branch from 380 to
Jim Crystal.
Streets Project on hold due to
COVID-19
Direct business
contact, Door hangers (940) 349-7146
Mayhill Rd.
US 380 (E.
University
Dr.)
Edwards Rd.09/01/17 04/30/20 Street Widening (Temporary
Lane Closures)
Engineering,
Traffic, TxDOT,
CIP
Construction is
continuing thru COVID-
19. Please respect
workers efforts in the
field and always
maintain social
distancing.
4/8/20 - Lanes continue
to open. Expect various
lane closures as work
wraps up without benefit
of full lane closures.
4/1/20 - Ultimate Lanes
are being opened as
roadwork is coming to
end.
3/25/20 - Additional
Lane(s) may open as
early as this week.
3/18/20 - Project
Walkthrus are underway
and lanes will continue
to be closed as needed
to facilitate final work.
Door Hangers (940) 349-8925
Mockernut Rd.
Intersection
with Vintage
Blvd.
back of
Vintage
Blvd. right of
way
03/16/20 05/01/20
Intermittent closures of this
intersection for construction
activities.
Engineering NextDoor, Email
Notification (940) 349-8938
Current Closures
162
Street/Intersection From To Closure
Start Date
Closure
End Date Description Department Upcoming
Info/Notes
Public
Meeting
Other
Communication
Department
Contact
N. Bell Ave Texas College 02/28/20 05/10/20 Building out west side of
building
Public Works
Inspections,
Private
Development
NextDoor (940) 205-9230
Prairie St.Locust St.Elm St.03/23/20 06/26/20
Storm drain improvements, as
part of Pec-4 Ph 1&2
Project. Street closed to thru
traffic.
Engineering Direct business contact (940) 349-8938
Quail Creek Dr.Quail Creek
Dr.
Berry Down
Ln.03/16/20 03/17/20
Concrete Street Panel Repair.
At roundabout Circle. The
process starts with
Barricading the failed
sections of concrete
pavement, remove the
pavement, and install new
concrete.
Streets Project on hold due to
COVID-19 N/A (940) 349-7146
Roberts St Bell Ave Cherrywood
Ln 02/10/20 03/17/20
Wastewater collections will be
installing a new wastewater
main line and services.
Wastewater Project on hold due to
COVID-19 N/A (940) 349-8909
S. Elm St.Prairie St.Eagle 03/16/20 04/27/20
Water main improvements
along Elm St. as part of the Pec-
4 Ph 1&2 Project.
Engineering West side lane closure.Direct business contact,
Door hangers (940) 349-8938
S. Locust St.Warren Ct.Highland St.12/16/19 04/24/20 Drainage Improvements as part
of the Pec-4 Ph 1&2 Project.Engineering West side lane closure Direct business contact,
Door hangers (940) 349-8938
Scripture Street Thomas
Street Malone 03/16/20 06/30/20
The 2019 Street Reconstruction
project consists of the
reconstruction of roadways
listed above. This
reconstruction shall include new
curb and gutter, ADA compliant
ramps in sidewalks, asphalt or
concrete roadways as well as
upgraded drainage, water and
wastewater facilities
Engineering NextDoor, Email
Notification (940) 349-7426
Shagbark Dr
intersection
with Vintage
Blvd
back of
Vintage Blvd
right of way
03/16/20 05/01/20
Intermittent closure of the
intersection for construction
activities.
Engineering NextDoor, Email
Notification (940) 349-8938
Thomas Street W. Oak Panhandle 03/16/20 06/01/20
The 2019 Street Reconstruction
project consists of the
reconstruction of roadways
listed above. This
reconstruction shall include new
curb and gutter, ADA compliant
ramps in sidewalks, asphalt or
concrete roadways as well as
upgraded drainage, water and
wastewater facilities
Engineering
NextDoor, Email
Notification, Direct
business contact
(940) 349-7426
Current Closures
163
Street/Intersection From To Closure
Start Date
Closure
End Date Description Department Upcoming
Info/Notes
Public
Meeting
Other
Communication
Department
Contact
US 380 (E. University Dr.)
1200' East of
N. Mayhill
Rd.
1200' West
of E. Mayhill
Rd.
11/01/19 04/30/20 Signal Upgrade and Installation
Engineering,
Traffic, TxDOT,
CIP
Construction is
continuing thru COVID-
19. Please respect
workers efforts in the
field and always
maintain social
distancing.
4/8/20 - Ongoing
4/1/20 - US 380/Mayhill
Signal Installation is
wrapping up
successfully. Next step
requires pavement
marking installations to
set stop bars and
pedestrian crosswalks.
This work will require
various lanes of travel to
be closed. Typically,
there will be 2 lanes
closed in each direction
(eastbound and
westbound) with a
minimum of one-lane
open at all times.
3/25/20 - US 380/Mayhill
Signal Installation is in
progress. Expected to
last 1 - 2 weeks and will
require various lanes of
travel to close.
Additional outreach not
needed (940) 349-8925
Warren Ct.Wainwright
St.Locust St.12/16/19 06/05/20 Drainage Improvements as part
of Pec-4 Ph 1&2 Project Engineering Closed to thru traffic Direct business contact,
door hangers (940) 349-8938
West Windsor Drive Mesquite
Street
North Elm
Street 03/30/20 05/16/20
Closure of lanes of Windsor
Drive to facilitate paving
operations related to the
Magnolia Phase II drainage
improvement project.
Westbound and center lanes
will be closed and re-paved and
then swapped to a closure of
the Eastbound and center lanes
once the Westbound lanes are
complete.
Engineering Email Notification (940) 349-8425
Woodland St Brown Dr Cherrywood
Ln 02/10/20 03/17/20
Wastewater collections will be
installing a new wastewater
main line and services
Wastewater Project on hold due to
COVID-19 N/A (940) 349-8909
Total 42
Current Closures
164
Street/Intersection From To Closure
Start Date
Closure
End Date Description Department Upcoming
Info/Notes
Public
Meeting
Other
Communication
Department
Contact
3309 Forest Ridge Rolling Hills El Paseo 03/02/20 03/27/20
Concrete Street Panel Repair.
The process starts with
Barricading the failed sections
of concrete pavement, remove
the pavement, and install new
concrete.
Streets Changed per email from
Rogelio San Miguel N/A (940) 349-7146
Bell Ave.Texas College 02/10/20 04/27/20 Building out East side of
building
Public Works
Inspections,
Private
Development
Rescheduling street
closure for later date NextDoor (940) 205-9230
Bent Oaks Teasley Cul V Sac 02/24/20 03/17/20
Concrete Street Panel and
Sidewalk Repair. The process
starts with Barricading the failed
sections of concrete pavement,
remove the pavement, and
install new concrete.
Streets Project on hold due to
COVID-19 N/A (940) 349-7146
Haven Way Brookside Park Place 02/24/20 03/27/20
Concrete Street Panel and
Sidewalk Repair. The process
starts with Barricading the failed
sections of concrete pavement,
remove the pavement, and
install new concrete.
Streets N/A (940) 349-7146
Hickory Creek Rd.Teasley Riverpass TBD TBD Street Widening
(Temporary Lane Closures)Engineering
From 1/13/20 to 3/8/20,
City's Contractor will be
clearing trees and
vegetation along the
south side of Hickory
Creek Rd., from the
west property line of
McNair Elementary
School to the Riverpass
Dr. intersection. This
will not involve any lane
closures, but
construction zone
signage will be put up to
warn motorists. Atmos
still needs to relocate
their facilities east of the
Montecito intersection
before our Contractor
can fully deploy to the
project.
Phone call to McNair
Elementary Principal (940) 349-7112
Street Closure Report
Week of April 13, 2020 - April 19, 2020
Completed Closures
Completed Closures
165
Street/Intersection From To Closure
Start Date
Closure
End Date Description Department Upcoming
Info/Notes
Public
Meeting
Other
Communication
Department
Contact
Hinkle Dr.Headlee Windsor 07/03/19 03/28/20
Street and Drainage
Improvements Magnolia
Drainage Ph. II
(Street Closure)
Engineering
Significant delays in
placing base pavement
due to weather.
Pavement placed 3/11
and 3/12 on Hinkle. Rain
on the afternoon of 3/12
and continuing through
3/19 has delayed
completion of road
surface. New anticipated
finish date of Hinkle and
opening to through
traffic pushed back 1
week to 3/28/20
(940) 349-8910
Industrial Sycamore Bell 03/09/20 03/27/20
Installing Valley Gutter across
Industrial at the intersection of
Sycamore. The process starts
with barricading then remove
pavement and subgrade, and
install new concrete Valley
Gutter.
Streets N/A (940) 349-7146
IOOF Street Eagle Drive Sycamore
Street 01/06/20 03/17/20 Closer no longer needed.
Atmos, Public
Works
Inspections
Atmos Energy to notify
apartment complex's in
area at least three
business days in
advance.
(940) 205-8278
Long Rd Sherman/42
8
Natatorium
Entrance 03/09/20 03/28/20
Closed Long Rd. from
Sherman/428 to entrance of
Natatorium to install a water
connection and sewer
connection in Long Rd.
Water, Waste
Water
NextDoor, Direct
business contact (940) 391-6299
Maple St.Elm St.Myrtle St.02/24/20 03/06/20
Water Line improvements, as
part of Pec-4 Ph 1&2
Project. Alternating lane
closures.
Engineering Direct business contact (940) 349-7112
Montecito Dr.Hickory
Creek Rd.
Buena Vista
Dr.TBD TBD
Installation of new storm
drainage line. Full street
closure.
Engineering
City PM will contact
McNair Elementary
Principal again on
2/7/20.
(940) 349-7112
Oak St. at Fry St. Signal Intersection
of Fry 11/04/19 04/10/20 Signal Construction (Intermittent
Lane Closures)Traffic (940) 349-7486
Prairie St.Elm St.Pierce St.11/04/19 04/10/20
Water and Wastewater Main
improvements, as part of Pec-4
Ph 1&2 Project. Prairie St. will
be closed to thru traffic.
Engineering (940) 349-8938
Rushing Springs Dr.Hickory
Creek Rd.
Marble Cove
Ln.TBD TBD
Installation of new storm
drainage line. Intersection
closure. Traffic will be detoured
to Serenity Way.
Engineering N/A (940) 349-7112
Completed Closures
166
Street/Intersection From To Closure
Start Date
Closure
End Date Description Department Upcoming
Info/Notes
Public
Meeting
Other
Communication
Department
Contact
S. Bonnie Brae St.Willowwood
St.
Highland
Park Rd.01/28/20 04/11/20
Water transmission main
installation. Street will be
closed to thru traffic.
Engineering Changed per email from
Robin Davis
Door hangers delivered
to local residents on
1/29/20.
(940) 349-7112
Union Circle Welch Welch 03/09/20 03/20/20
Curb And Gutter Repair.
Repairing Broken Curbs and
Drive Approaches, barricade
and remove and install new
Concrete Curbs.
Streets N/A (940) 349-7146
W Parkway Street Locust
Street N Elm Street 03/16/20 04/17/20
This project is a sidewalk
installation project on the south
side of W Parkway from Locust
to Elm. It is part of our 2018
Sidewalk Program that will
improve pedestrian access and
upgrade ADA infrastructure.
The local businesses in this are
will be notified by door hanger
and personal visits by staff to
ensure all necessary concerns
are addressed.
Engineering,
Public Works
Inspections,
Floyd Smith
Concrete
Direct business contact,
Door hangers (940) 349-7104
West Windsor Drive Parkside
Drive
Mesquite
Street 11/11/19 04/04/20
Windsor opened from Parkside
to Riney Road. Still local traffic
only from Riney to Mesquite.
Streets,
Drainage, Water,
Waste Water
NextDoor, Email
Notification (940) 349-8425
Total 18
Completed Closures
167